UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

   X  . QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010

      . TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from ___________ to _____________

HPC POS SYSTEM, CORP.

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

Nevada		333-149188		26-0857573
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(Commission file  number)		(IRS Employer Identification Number)

6409 Lake Meadow Drive, Burke, VA 22015

(Address of principal executive office)

(703) 283-9736

(Issuer’s telephone number)

Check whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and (2)has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes   X  . No      .

*All 10Ks and 10Qs for the periods September 30, 2009 through September 30 2010 have been filed delinquently.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	.	Accelerated filer	.
Non-accelerated filer	. (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	X .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Yes      . No   X  .

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 174,350,000  shares of Common Stock, as of January 31, 2011.

---

HPC POS SYSTEM, CORP.

FORM 10-Q

MARCH 31, 2010

INDEX

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION	Page
Item 1. Financial Statements	3
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	12
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	15
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	15
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	16
Item 1A. Risk Factors	16
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	22
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	22
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)	22
Item 5. Other Information	22
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	22
SIGNATURES	22

2

---

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial statements

HPC POS SYSTEM, CORP.

Balance Sheets

March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009

		March 31, 2010 (unaudited)			September 30, 2009
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash	$	13	$		-
Accounts receivable		-			-
Total		13			-
OTHER ASSETS – net of reserve of $53,600 in 2010 and 2009		-			-
TOTAL ASSETS	$	13	$		-
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Convertible note payable	$	28,600	$		50,000
Bank overdraft		-			4,510
Loan payable to President		18,721			-
Advance payments received		89,250			89,250
Total Current Liabilities		136,571			143,760
STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT):
Preferred stock: $0.001 par value; authorized, 1,000,000 shares; no shares issued or outstanding		-			-
Common stock: $0.001 par value; authorized 250,000,000 shares; 174,350,000 and 152,950,000, respectively, shares issued and outstanding		174,350			152,950
Additional paid-in capital		(118,084)			(118,084)
Accumulated deficit		(192,824)			(178,626)
Total stockholders’ deficit		(136,558)			(143,760)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT	$	13	$		-

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

3

---

HPC POS SYSTEM, CORP.

Statements of Operations

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009

(Unaudited)

		2010		2009
Sales	$	46,101	$	266,673
Cost of sales		27,799		160,804
Gross profit		18,302		105,869
Expenses:
Operating		3,351		-
Compensation		32,938		42,979
Total		36.289		42,979
Net income (loss)	$	(17,987)	$	62,890
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share	$	(0.00)	$	0.00
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding		174,350,000		142,950,000

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

4

---

HPC POS SYSTEM, CORP.

Statements of Operations

For the Six Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009

(Unaudited)

		2010		2009
Sales	$	46,101	$	370,303
Cost of sales		27,799		223,293
Gross profit		18,302		147,010
Expenses:
Operating		94		-
Compensation		32,406		109,391
Total		32,500		109,391
Net income (loss)	$	(14,198)	$	37,619
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share	$	(0.00)	$	0.00
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding		169,422,527		142,950,000

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

5

---

HPC POS SYSTEM, CORP.

Statements of Cash Flows

 For the Six Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009

(Unaudited)

		2010		2009
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	(14,198)	$	37,619
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Change in advance payments received		-		27,750
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities		(14,198)		65,369
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES - Purchase of water filtration equipment		-		(33,600)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Loan from President		18,721		-
Bank overdraft		(4,510)		-
		14,211		-
NET CHANGE IN CASH		13		31,769
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		-		71,432
CASH AT END OF PERIOD	$	13	$	103,201
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for interest	$	-	$	-
Cash paid for income taxes	$	-	$	-
SUPPLEMENTAL NONCASH TRANSACTION:
Issuance of common stock in connection with exercise of Convertible Note	$	21,400	$	-
See accompanying notes to financial statements.

6

---

HPC POS SYSTEM, CORP.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION

HPC POS System, Corp. (“HPC” and the “Company”) was founded as a New Jersey corporation on June 27, 1996 and became a corporation in the State of Nevada on June 15, 2007. On August 7, 2009, HPC entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”) among the Company and certain of its shareholders, House of Mohan Corporation (“Mohan”), a Delaware Corporation, and the shareholders of Mohan (the “Mohan Shareholders”).  Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company agreed to issue to the Mohan Shareholders an aggregate of 142,950,000 restricted shares of its common stock in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Mohan.  The closing of the Agreement was subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions, including, but not limited to the receipt of all requisite consents, waivers and approvals by the Company and Mohan. The transaction closed August 7, 2009.

Effective at the completion of the merger, the Company assigned and transferred to Mordechai Guttman, former President and principal stockholder of HPC, all of HPC’s rights, title and interest in and to HPC’s operating assets in exchange for which Mr. Guttman assumed HPC’s operating liabilities as defined in such Agreement. At that time, all of the Company’s operations consisted entirely of the operations of Mohan.

The merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition and recapitalization of Mohan. Mohan is the acquirer for accounting and financial reporting purposes, and HPC is the issuer. Accordingly, Mohan's historical financial statements for periods prior to the acquisition become those of the acquirer retroactively restated for the equivalent number of shares issued in the merger. Operations reported prior to the merger date are solely those of Mohan. No HPC operating results from prior to the merger date are included. Earnings per share for the periods prior to the merger are retroactively restated to reflect the equivalent number of shares outstanding.

Mohan imports and distributes incense. Its products are acquired from India. All transactions between the Company and vendors in India are denominated in United States dollars.

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared by management in accordance with both accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S.    GAAP”) and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in audited financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading.

In the opinion of management, these unaudited condensed financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments considered necessary to state fairly the results for the periods presented. The results for the period ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year ending September 30, 2010 or for any future period.

These unaudited condensed financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2009 and notes thereto included in the Company’s  annual report on Form 10-K.

NOTE 3 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

a.  Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

b.  Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

7

---

c.   Impairment of Long-lived Assets

The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets.  The Company’s long-lived assets, which include security deposits, goodwill and furniture and fixtures, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.

The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts.  Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets.  Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable.  If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.  The Company determined that its water filtration equipment with a cost of $53,600 was impaired during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 when Management decided to no longer seek being in the water filtration business and established a reserve against the entire balance.

d.  Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments.  Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels.  The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  The three levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. The Company’s note payable approximates the fair value of such instrument based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangement at September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2010.

The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or a non-recurring basis, consequently, the Company did not have any fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value at September 30, 2009, nor gains or losses are reported in the statement of operations that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date for the interim period ended March 31, 2010.

e.   Revenue Recognition

The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned less estimated future doubtful accounts. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

8

---

An allowance for doubtful accounts is applied to accounts receivable based upon historical experience. No allowance was considered necessary or provided as of March 31, 2010 because the Company had no accounts receivable at that date.   

f.  Income Taxes

Mohan had elected to be an S corporation for Federal income tax purposes from inception until following the completion of the merger with HPC. Under the tax rules for S corporations, principals are taxed separately on their distributive share of the corporation’s taxable income whether or not that income is actually distributed.

Mohan ceased being an S corporation following the completion of its merger with HPC. The Company now accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”).  Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements.  Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.  The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.  Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.  The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of Section 740-10-25.

g.  Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) Per Common Share

Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.  Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during each period. Shares issuable under an outstanding convertible note (see Note 4) were not included in the calculation of earnings per share because they would not have been dilutive.

h.  Subsequent Events

The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company evaluates subsequent events from the date of the balance sheet through the date when the financial statements are issued.  Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them with the SEC on the EDGAR system.

i.  Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-09, Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2010-09”), which is included in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “ASC”) Topic 855 Subsequent Events.  ASU 2010-09 clarifies that an SEC filer is required to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued.  ASU 2010-09 is effective upon the issuance of the final update and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

9

---

In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles as the single source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, aside from those issued by the SEC.  ASC 105 does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place.  The adoption of ASC 105 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements, but did eliminate all references to pre-codification standards.

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that may impact its financial statements and does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 4 – GOING CONCERN AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. At March 31, 2010, the Company has limited financial resources, has not established a source of equity financing, has negative working capital and a stockholders’ deficit. These factors, among others, indicate that the Company's continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to achieve profitable operations or obtain adequate financing.

The Company had sales of approximately $46,000 during the nine months ended June 30, 2010 because it could not finance purchases of inventory. However, the Company negotiated distribution agreements with wholesale distributors and, in June 2010, obtained a line of credit to purchase inventory.

Upon executing the Revolving Loan and Security Agreement, the Company started working with its distributors to obtain orders and plan deliveries. It received four purchase orders (for $414,350, $277,500, $276,500 and $277,500) from Price Master Corporation. The Company delivered the $414,350 purchase order in September 2010. The advance payments liability of $89,250 at September 30, 2009 was fully amortized with the delivery of shipments under the $414,350 purchase order.

The Company hopes that these agreements will result in increased revenues and profits. However, it may need a source of capital or additional credit in order to finance the additional inventory levels needed to take advantage of the distribution agreements. However, the Company cannot predict the likelihood of it being successful in its efforts.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence.

NOTE 5 - REVOLVING LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT

The line of credit is set forth in a $1,500,000 Revolving Loan and Security Agreement from Ashford Finance, LLC. The two-year agreement provides financing arrangements solely for the purchase of inventory. Its principal terms include:

·

Interest due on loans under the agreement is equal to three percentage points above the prevailing prime lending rate, as defined, except that interest on loans will never be less than 5.5% per annum.

·

An account management fee is charged equal to 3.25% per month of the face amount of each letter of credit or other financing issued to a Mohan vendor.

·

Loans can be called on demand but, in any event, must be paid immediately upon receipt of proceeds from a customer to which financed inventory was shipped.

·

Mohan has pledged substantially all of its tangible and intangible assets as collateral.

·

Liabilities under the Revolving Loan and Security Agreement are guaranteed by Melvin Coles.

·

The Company cannot issue new shares of common stock except to existing shareholders.

·

The Company must pay the cost of insurance premiums covering balances outstanding to protect the lender against defaults and incurs numerous other fees.

At September 30, 2010, there was $229,026 outstanding under the line of credit, which was paid in full on October 12, 2010 from the proceeds of a sale delivered in September 2010.

10

---

NOTE 6 – CONVERTIBLE NOTE PAYABLE

Mohan incurred $50,000 of legal costs as part of the reverse merger/recapitalization transaction with HPC. HPC owed Gary B. Wolff, its outside counsel, $50,000 under a Convertible Promissory Note which bears interest at the rate of 2% per annum and is convertible at the rate of $.001 per share. Following negotiation between all parties, it was agreed for the note to be assigned to Mohan in satisfaction of its liability for legal services. The $50,000 legal expense is included operating expenses during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.

On November 5, 2009, the holder of the Convertible Note assigned $12,500 of the principal balance to JW Financial LLC which converted that entire amount for 12,500,000 shares. On November 10, 2009, the holder of the Convertible Note converted $8,900 of the principal balance for 8,900,000 shares.

At September 30, 2010, there was a remaining principal balance of $28,600 due under the Convertible Note, which is convertible, at the holder’s option, in up to 28,600,000 shares.

NOTE 7 – LOAN DUE TO THE COMPANY PRESIDENT

Before receiving the Revolving Credit Agreement described in Note 5, much of the Company’s fiscal 2010 operations were financed through noninterest-bearing loans from its President. At March 31, 2010, the amount owed under these loans was $18,721.

NOTE 8 - STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

The Company is authorized to issue 250,000,000 shares of common stock and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock.

Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement described in Note 1, HPC agreed to issue an aggregate of 142,950,000 restricted shares of HPC's common stock to the Mohan Shareholders in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Mohan.

At February 8, 2011, there were 174,350,000 shares of common stock outstanding.

Mohan, the acquirer for financial reporting purposes, had elected to be an S corporation for Federal income tax purposes from its inception until following the completion of its merger with HPC. In accordance with Topic 4B of the Staff Accounting Bulletins issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission all of Mohan’s undistributed earnings and losses that occurred during the period in which it was an S corporation have been reclassified to additional paid-in capital.

Stock Option Plan

Pursuant to a November 30, 2007 Board of Directors approval and subsequent stockholder approval, the Company adopted its 2007 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) whereby it reserved for issuance up to 1,500,000 shares of its common stock to directors, officers, employees, consultants and professionals. The purpose of the Plan is to provide recipients with additional incentives by increasing their ownership interest in the Company.   The Plan provides for the issuance of Non-Statutory Stock Options only, which are not intended to qualify as “incentive stock options” within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. The Plan expires in 2017.

No options have been issued or are outstanding under the Plan.

NOTE 9 – CONCENTRATION OF RISK

The wholesale distribution contract with Price Master Corporation accounted for more than 95% of Mohan's incense sales for the fiscal period ended March 31, 2009 and is likely to account for a significant portion of our sales in the foreseeable future. The Advance Payments of $89,250 as of December 31, 2009 were received from Price Master Corporation.

All purchases of incense are made from a single supplier in India.

NOTE 10 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date of March 31, 2010 through February 8, 2011, the date these financial statements were issued. The Company has disclosed all subsequent events believed to be material in the applicable footnotes above.

11

---

Item 2. NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain matters discussed herein are forward-looking statements.  Such forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q involve risks and uncertainties, including statements as to:

·

our future operating results;

·

our business prospects;

·

any contractual arrangements and relationships with third parties;

·

the dependence of our future success on the general economy;

·

any possible financings; and

·

the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital.

These forward-looking statements can generally be identified as such because the context of the statement will include words such as we “believe," “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate” or words of similar meaning.   Similarly, statements that describe our future plans, objectives or goals are also forward-looking statements.   Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which are described in close proximity to such statements and which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated as of the date of filing of this Form 10-Q.   Shareholders, potential investors and other readers are urged to consider these factors in evaluating the forward-looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.   The forward-looking statements included herein are only made as of the date of filing of this Form 10-Q, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The following discussion and analysis provides information which the Company’s management believes to be relevant to an assessment and understanding of the Company's results of operations and financial condition. This discussion should be read together with the Company's financial statements and the notes to financial statements, which are included in this report.

Operations  

As HPC did not have significant, meaningful revenues prior to the merger, the transaction was treated as a recapitalization of Mohan, and accounted for on a historical cost basis for all periods presented. Moreover, the financial statements set forth in this report for all periods, prior to the recapitalization, are the financial statements of Mohan and the common stock of Mohan has been retroactively restated to give the effect to the exchange for HPC common stock.

Operations for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009

Our operations were as follows:

		2010		2009
Sales	$	46,101	$	370,303
Cost of sales		27,799		223,293
Gross profit		18,302		147,010
Expenses:
Operating		94		-
Compensation		32,406		109,391
Total		32,500		109,391
Net income (loss)	$	(14,198)	$	37,619

Mohan’s revenues were severely impacted throughout the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 because, as a generally discretionary purchase, demand for its products was hurt badly by the recession in the United States. In addition, Mohan was adapting to dealing principally with Price Master Corporation as its principal distributor, and Mohan's tight cash position limited its ability to import inventory products on a timely basis. Its vendors insist on being paid in full upon shipment of product. As a result there were severe inventory shortages in the last quarter of the fiscal year.

12

---

Mohan was unable to obtain financing for the purchase of inventory during the nine months ended June 30, 2010. As a result, total sales for that period were limited to $46,000, including no sales during the three months ended December 31, 2009. Upon signing a Revolving Credit Agreement, Mohan was able to finance the purchase of inventory which permitted it to make a shipment to Price Master Corporation at the end of September 2010. This sale was for $414,000. The cost of the sale was $234,000. Mohan incurred additional freight, insurance, customs and finance fees of $43,776 on the transaction. The sale permitted Mohan to fully amortize an advance payment of $89,250 received from Price Master Corporation during fiscal 2009 and fully repay all amounts due under the

Revolving Credit Agreement.

During the two fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, Mohan devoted time and resources investigating the water filtration industry. It has decided not to pursue that product line or industry further. Everything relating to the investigation has been written off except two large pieces of equipment which management believes can be sold without incurring a loss.

All compensation was received by Mr. Coles, President. Mr. Coles does not receive a fixed salary. His compensation consists principally of the Company paying expenses and obligations on his behalf. These payments include reimbursement for amounts spent or incurred by Mr. Coles on our behalf. The amount and timing of payments are linked to the Company's cash position. No written arrangement exists.

Mohan incurred $50,000 of legal costs as part of the reverse merger/recapitalization transaction with HPC. HPC owed Gary B. Wolff, our outside counsel, $50,000 under a Convertible Promissory Note (the “Note”) which bears interest at the rate of 2% per annum. Following negotiation between all parties, it was agreed for the note to be assigned to Mohan in satisfaction of its liability for legal services. The $50,000 legal expense is included operating expenses during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.

At September 30, 2009, we established a reserve for $53,600 against the full carrying cost of water filtration equipment purchased in 2009 and 2008. We were considering entering the water filtration business but, because of economic factors, decided not to pursue that area.

Other

As a corporate policy, we will not incur any cash obligations that we cannot satisfy with known resources, of which there are currently none except as described in “Liquidity” below.

Liquidity

During most of the two fiscal years ended September 30, 2009 we did not have any credit facilities or other commitments for debt or equity financing. As a result, we began having more and more difficulty purchasing inventory to meet the needs of distribution agreements with Price Master Corporation and Yemjada Corporation. The situation worsened and, as a result, Mohan had limited sales during the first three fiscal quarters of the year ended September 30, 2010.

In June 2010, Mohan obtained a $1,500,000 Revolving Loan and Security Agreement from Ashford Finance, LLC. The two-year agreement provides financing arrangements solely for the purchase of inventory. Its principal terms include:

·

Interest due on loans under the agreement is equal to three percentage points above the prevailing prime lending rate, as defined, except that interest on loans will never be less than 5.5% per annum.

·

An account management fee is charged equal to 3.25% per month of the face amount of each letter of credit or other financing issued to a Mohan vendor.

·

Loans can be called on demand but, in any event, must be paid immediately upon receipt of proceeds from a customer to which financed inventory was shipped.

·

Mohan has pledged substantially all of its tangible and intangible assets as collateral.

·

Liabilities under the Revolving Loan and Security Agreement are guaranteed by Melvin Coles.

·

The Company cannot issue new shares of common stock except to existing shareholders.

·

The Company must pay the cost of insurance premiums covering balances outstanding to protect the lender against defaults and incurs numerous other fees.

At September 30, 2010, there was $229,026 outstanding under the line of credit, which was paid in full on October 12, 2010 from the proceeds of a sale delivered in September 2010.

.

13

---

Upon executing the Revolving Loan and Security Agreement, we started working with our distributors to plan deliveries. During the summer of 2010, we received four purchase orders (for $414,350, $277,500, $276,500 and $277,500) from Price Master Corporation. We delivered the $414,350 purchase order in September 2010.

Before receiving the Revolving Credit Agreement, much of our operations were financed through noninterest-bearing loans from our President. At September 30, 2010, the amount owed under these loans was $49,032.

We are a public company and, by doing so, have incurred and will continue to incur additional significant expenses for legal, accounting and related services. Once we became a public entity, subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act of 1934, we will incur ongoing expenses associated with professional fees for accounting, legal and a host of other expenses for annual reports. We estimate that these costs will range up to $50,000 per year for the next few years and will be higher if our business volume and activity increases. These obligations will reduce our ability and resources to fund other aspects of our business. We hope to be able to use our status as a public company to increase our ability to use noncash means of settling obligations and compensate independent contractors who provide professional services to us, although there can be no assurances that we will be successful in any of those efforts. We will reduce the compensation levels paid to our president if there is insufficient cash generated from operations to satisfy these costs.

Mohan incurred $50,000 of legal costs as part of the reverse merger/recapitalization transaction with HPC. HPC owed Gary B. Wolff, our outside counsel, $50,o00 under a Convertible Promissory Note (the “Note”) which bears interest at the rate of 2% per annum. Following negotiation between all parties, it was agreed for the note to be assigned to Mohan in satisfaction of its liability for legal services. The $50,000 legal expense is included operating expenses during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.

On November 5, 2009, the holder of the Convertible Note assigned $12,500 of the principal balance to JW Financial LLC which converted that entire amount for 12,500,000 shares. On November 10, 2009, the holder of the Convertible Note converted $8,900 of the principal balance for 8,900,000 shares.

At September 30, 2010, there was a remaining principal balance of $28,600 due under the Convertible Note, which is convertible, at the holder’s option, into a maximum of 28,600,000 shares.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-09, Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2010-09”), which is included in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 855 Subsequent Events.  ASU 2010-09 clarifies that an SEC filer is required to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued.  ASU 2010-09 is effective upon the issuance of the final update and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles as the single source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, aside from those issued by the SEC.  ASC 105 does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place.  The adoption of ASC 105 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements, but did eliminate all references to pre-codification standards.

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that may impact its financial statements and does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements and related notes requires us to make judgments, estimates, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.

An accounting policy is considered to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact the financial statements.

14

---

Financial Reporting Release No. 60 requires all companies to include a discussion of critical accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of financial statements.  There are no critical policies or decisions that rely on judgments that are based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made.  Note 3 to the financial statements includes a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our financial statements. 

Seasonality

We have not noted a significant seasonal impact in our business.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K, obligations under any guarantee contracts or contingent obligations. We also have no other commitments, other than the costs of being a public company that will increase our operating costs or cash requirements in the future

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Pursuant to Item 305(e) of Regulation S-K (§ 229.305(e)), the Company is not required to provide the information required by this Item as it is a “smaller reporting company,” as defined by Rule 229.10(f)(1).

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Management’s Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.  The Company's internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

·

Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

·

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and

·

that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the Company's management and directors; and

·

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

As of March 31, 2010, our management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.  In making this assessment, management followed an approach based on the framework set forth in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (known as “COSO”).  Based on this assessment, management has determined that the Company's internal control over financial reporting contained certain significant weaknesses as of March 31, 2010 because of the Company’s lack of resources and the lack of financial and record-keeping experience and knowledge of officers as of that date. Improvements were implemented subsequent to that date, which Management believes result in the Company's internal control over financial reporting becoming effective.

This quarterly report does not include an attestation report of the Company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management's report in this quarterly report.

15

---

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

Currently we are not aware of any litigation pending or threatened by or against the Company.

Item 1A.  RISK FACTORS

You should be aware that there are various risks to an investment in our common stock. You should carefully consider these risk factors, together with all of the other information included in this Report, before you decide to invest in shares of our common stock.

If any of the following risks develop into actual events, then our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or prospects could be materially adversely affected. If that happens, the market price of our common stock, if any, could decline, and investors may lose all or part of their investment.

Risks Related to the Business

The auditors’ report on our fiscal 2009 financial statements contains an explanatory paragraph emphasizing that there is significant uncertainty about our ability to continue as a going concern which may make it more difficult for us to raise capital or other financing.

HPC had negative working capital and a net stockholders’ deficit at March 31, 2010. Our independent registered auditors indicated that there is significant uncertainty about our ability to continue as a going concern in an explanatory paragraph to their report on our financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 which may make it more difficult and expensive for us to raise capital.

If we are unable to generate revenue or obtain financing or if the financing we do obtain is insufficient to cover any operating losses we may incur, we may have to substantially curtail or terminate our operations.

Substantially all of our revenue was derived from sales to one unrelated company.

The wholesale distribution contract with Price Master Corporation will account for a very substantial portion of Mohan's incense sales for the foreseeable future. Price Master Corporation can cancel our agreement with us by giving us notice of 90 days. If Price Master Corporation ceases to buy our products or substantially reduces its purchases of our products, we may be unable to continue operations.

The operations of Mohan are and will continue to be completely dependent on the services of Melvin Coles. The loss of Mr. Coles’ services would cause major deterioration in our business operations.

The operations and business strategy of Mohan are completely dependent upon the knowledge and contacts of Melvin Coles, our President. He is under no contractual obligation to remain employed by us.  If he should choose to leave us for any reason before we have hired additional personnel, our operations would deteriorate or fail.  Even if we are able to find additional personnel, it is uncertain whether we could find someone who could develop our business along the lines described in this annual report.

We intend to acquire key-man life insurance on the life of Mr. Coles naming us as the beneficiary when and if we obtain the resources to do so and Mr. Coles is insurable at that time. We have not yet procured such insurance, and there is no guarantee that we will be able to obtain such insurance in the future.  Accordingly, it is important that we are able to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified and talented personnel and independent contractors.

Melvin Coles, our chief executive and chief financial officer, has no meaningful accounting or financial reporting education or experience and, accordingly, our ability to meet Exchange Act reporting requirements on a timely basis will be dependent to a significant degree upon others.

Melvin Coles has no meaningful financial reporting education or experience. He is and will remain heavily dependent on advisors and consultants. As such, there is risk about our ability to comply with all financial reporting requirements accurately and on a timely basis.

16

---

We are subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which requires us to incur audit fees and legal fees in connection with the preparation of such reports.  These additional costs could reduce or eliminate our ability to earn a profit.

We are required to file periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. In order to comply with these requirements, our independent registered public accounting firm has to review our financial statements on a quarterly basis and audit our financial statements on an annual basis. Moreover, our legal counsel has to review and assist in the preparation of such reports. The costs charged by these professionals for such services cannot be accurately predicted because factors such as the number and type of transactions that we engage in and the complexity of our reports cannot be determined at this time and will have a major effect on the amount of time to be spent by our auditors and attorneys. However, the incurrence of such costs will obviously be an expense to our operations and thus have a negative effect on our ability to meet our overhead requirements and earn a profit.

We currently have only one full-time employee which is not a sufficient number of employees to segregate responsibilities. We may be unable to afford the cost of increasing our staff or engaging outside consultants or professionals to overcome our lack of employees. Moreover, effective internal controls, particularly those related to revenue recognition, are necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important to help prevent financial fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and the trading price of our common stock, if a market ever develops, could drop significantly.

Our internal controls may be inadequate, which could cause our financial reporting to be unreliable and lead to misinformation being disseminated to the public.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.  As defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the principal executive and principal financial officer and effected by the board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

·

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

·

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and

·

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. 

Because of our limited resources and personnel, our internal controls may be inadequate or ineffective, which could cause our financial reporting to be unreliable and lead to misinformation being disseminated to the public.  Investors relying upon this misinformation may make an uninformed investment decision.

Having only one director limits our ability to establish effective independent corporate governance procedures and increases the control of our president.

We have only one director, who is also our president and chairman. Accordingly, we cannot establish board committees comprised of independent members to oversee functions like compensation or audit issues. Our President has virtually total control over all corporate issues.

Until we have a larger board of directors that would include some independent members, if ever, there will be limited oversight of our president’s decisions and activities and little ability for minority shareholders to challenge or reverse those activities and decisions, even if they are not in the best interests of minority shareholders.

17

---

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

Shareholders may be diluted significantly through our efforts to obtain financing and satisfy obligations through issuance of additional shares of our common stock.

We have no committed source of financing. Wherever possible, our board of directors will attempt to use non-cash consideration to satisfy obligations. In many instances, we believe that the non-cash consideration will consist of restricted shares of our common stock. Our board of directors has authority, without action or vote of the shareholders, to issue all or part of the authorized (250,000,000) but unissued (75,650,000) common shares. In addition, if a trading market develops for our common stock, we may attempt to raise capital by selling shares of our common stock, possibly at a discount to market. These actions will result in dilution of the ownership interests of existing shareholders, may further dilute common stock book value, and that dilution may be material.

The interests of shareholders may be hurt because we can issue shares of our common stock to individuals or entities that support existing management with such issuances serving to enhance existing management’s ability to maintain control of our Company.

Our board of directors has authority, without action or vote of the shareholders, to issue all or part of the authorized (200,000,000) but unissued (75,650,000) common shares. Such issuances may be issued to parties or entities committed to supporting existing management and the interests of existing management which may not be the same as the interests of other shareholders. Our ability to issue shares without shareholder approval serves to enhance existing management’s ability to maintain control of our Company.

Our board of directors has the authority, without stockholder approval, to issue preferred stock with terms that may not be beneficial to common stockholders and with the ability to affect adversely stockholder voting power and perpetuate their control over us.

Our articles of incorporation allow us to issue shares of preferred stock without any vote or further action by our stockholders. Our board of directors has the authority to fix and determine the relative rights and preferences of preferred stock. Our board of directors also has the authority to issue preferred stock without further stockholder approval, including large blocks of preferred stock. As a result, our board of directors could authorize the issuance of a series of preferred stock that would grant to holders the preferred right to our assets upon liquidation, the right to receive dividend payments before dividends are distributed to the holders of common stock and the right to the redemption of the shares, together with a premium, prior to the redemption of our common stock.

Our Articles of Incorporation provide for indemnification of officers and directors at our expense and limit their liability. These provisions may result in a major cost to us and hurt the interests of our shareholders because corporate resources may be expended for the benefit of officers and/or directors.  

Our Articles of Incorporation and applicable Nevada law provide for the indemnification of our directors, officers, employees, and agents, under certain circumstances, against attorney's fees and other expenses incurred by them in any litigation to which they become a party arising from their association with or activities on our behalf. We will also bear the expenses of such litigation for any of our directors, officers, employees, or agents, upon such person's written promise to repay us therefor, if it is ultimately determined that any such person shall not have been entitled to indemnification. This indemnification policy could result in substantial expenditures by us that we may be unable to recoup.

We have been advised that, in the opinion of the SEC, indemnification for liabilities arising under federal securities laws is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable.  In the event that a claim for indemnification for liabilities arising under federal securities laws, other than the payment by us of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding, is asserted by a director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, we will (unless in the opinion of our counsel, the matter has been settled by controlling precedent) submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction, the question whether indemnification by us is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue. The legal process relating to this matter if it were to occur is likely to be very costly and may result in us receiving negative publicity, either of which factors is likely to materially reduce the market and price for our shares, if such a market ever develops.    

18

---

Currently, there is no established public market for our securities, and there can be no assurances that any established public market will ever develop or that our common stock will be quoted for trading, and even if quoted, it is likely to be subject to significant price fluctuations.

There is currently no established public market whatsoever for our securities. FINRA had assigned us a trading symbol (HPCS) which enabled a market maker to quote the shares of our common stock on the OTCBB maintained by FINRA. However, we were delisted from the OTCBB because of delinquent public filings. We do not know whether we will be successful in having our listing being accepted by FINRA for inclusion on the OTCBB when and if we become current in all public filings.

There can be no assurances as to whether:

·

any market for our shares will develop;

·

the prices at which our common stock will trade; or

·

the extent to which investor in us will lead to the development of an active, liquid trading market. Active trading markets generally result in lower price volatility and more efficient execution of buy and sell orders for investors.

In addition, our common stock is unlikely to be followed by any market analysts, and there may be few institutions acting as market makers for our common stock. Either of these factors could adversely affect the liquidity and trading price of our common stock. Until an orderly market develops in our common stock, if ever, the price at which it trades is likely to fluctuate significantly. Prices for our common stock will be determined in the marketplace and may be influenced by many factors, including the depth and liquidity of the market for shares of our common stock, developments affecting our business, including the impact of the factors referred to elsewhere in these Risk Factors, investor perception of us and general economic and market conditions.  No assurances can be given that an orderly or liquid market will ever develop for the shares of our common stock.

Purchasers of our securities should be aware that any market that develops in our stock will be subject to the penny stock restrictions.

Any market that develops in shares of our common stock will be subject to the penny stock regulations and restrictions pertaining to low priced stocks that will create a lack of liquidity and make trading difficult or impossible.

The trading of our securities, if any, will be in the over-the-counter market which is commonly referred to as the OTCBB as maintained by FINRA if and when we become current with our public filings and FINRA accepts our listing request as submitted by a broker dealer. As a result, an investor may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations as to the price of our securities.

 Rule 3a51-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 establishes the definition of a "penny stock," for purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a minimum bid price of less than $4.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $4.00 per share, subject to a limited number of exceptions which are not available to us. It is likely that our shares will be considered to be penny stocks for the immediately foreseeable future. This classification severely and adversely affects any market liquidity for our common stock.

For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the penny stock rules require that a broker or dealer approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks and the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.  In order to approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must obtain financial information and investment experience and objectives of the person and make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and that that person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form, sets forth:

·

the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination, and

·

that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stock in both public offerings and in secondary trading and commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

19

---

Because of these regulations, broker-dealers may not wish to engage in the above-referenced necessary paperwork and disclosures and/or may encounter difficulties in their attempt to sell shares of our common stock, which may affect the ability of selling shareholders or other holders to sell their shares in any secondary market and have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in any secondary market. These additional sales practice and disclosure requirements could impede the sale of our securities, if and when our securities become publicly traded. In addition, the liquidity for our securities may decrease, with a corresponding decrease in the price of our securities. Our shares, in all probability, if they trade at all, will be subject to such penny stock rules for the foreseeable future, and our shareholders will, in all likelihood, find it difficult to sell their securities.

The market for penny stocks has experienced numerous frauds and abuses that could adversely impact investors in our stock.

Company management believes that the market for penny stocks has suffered from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include:

·

Control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer;

·

Manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases;

·

"Boiler room" practices involving high pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by sales persons;

·

Excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differentials and markups by selling broker-dealers; and

·

Wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the inevitable collapse of those prices with consequent investor losses.

Investors may have difficulty in reselling their shares because of state Blue Sky laws. 

Our common stock is currently not quoted on the OTCBB. No established market has ever developed for our common stock. If a market for our shares develops in the future, there are no assurances that it will be sustained.

The holders of our shares of common stock and persons who desire to purchase them in any trading market that might develop in the future should be aware that there may be significant state law restrictions upon the ability of investors to resell our shares. Accordingly, even if we are successful in having our shares available for trading on the OTCBB, investors should consider any secondary market for our securities to be a limited one. We intend to seek coverage and publication of information regarding the Company in an accepted publication which permits a "manual exemption." This manual exemption permits a security to be distributed in a particular state without being registered if the company issuing the security has a listing for that security in a securities manual recognized by the state. However, it is not enough for the security to be listed in a recognized manual. The listing entry must contain

·

The names of issuers, officers, and directors,

·

An issuer’s balance sheet, and

·

A profit and loss statement for either the fiscal year preceding the balance sheet or for the most recent fiscal year of operations

We may not be able to secure a listing containing all of this information.  Furthermore, the manual exemption is a non-issuer exemption restricted to secondary trading transactions, making it generally unavailable for issuers selling newly issued securities. Most of the accepted manuals are those published in Mergent, Inc., Standard and Poor's, Moody's Investor Service, Fitch's Investment Service, and Best's Insurance Reports, and many states expressly recognize these manuals. A smaller number of states declare that they “recognize securities manuals” but do not specify the recognized manuals. The following states do not have any provisions and therefore do not expressly recognize the manual exemption: Alabama, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Montana, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont and Wisconsin. Accordingly, our shares should be considered totally illiquid, which inhibits investors’ ability to resell their shares.

We do not expect to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future

We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock. We do not expect to pay cash dividends on our common stock at any time in the foreseeable future. The future payment of dividends directly depends upon our future earnings, capital requirements, financial requirements and other factors that our board of directors will consider. Since we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock, return on your investment, if any, will depend solely on an increase, if any, in the market value of our common stock.

20

---

Because we are not subject to compliance with rules requiring the adoption of certain corporate governance measures, our stockholders have limited protections against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest and similar matters.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rule changes proposed and enacted by the SEC, the New York and American Stock Exchanges and the Nasdaq Stock Market, as a result of Sarbanes-Oxley, require the implementation of various measures relating to corporate governance. These measures are designed to enhance the integrity of corporate management and the securities markets and apply to securities that are listed on those exchanges or the Nasdaq Stock Market. Because we are not presently required to comply with many of the corporate governance provisions and because we chose to avoid incurring the substantial additional costs associated with such compliance any sooner than legally required, we have not yet adopted these measures.

Because our director (one person – our president) is not an independent director, we do not currently have independent audit or compensation committees. As a result, our director has the ability, among other things, to determine his own level of compensation. Until we comply with such corporate governance measures, regardless of whether such compliance is required, the absence of such standards of corporate governance may leave our stockholders without protections against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest, if any, and similar matters and any potential investors may be reluctant to provide us with funds necessary to expand our operations.

We intend to comply with all corporate governance measures relating to director independence as and when required. However, we may find it very difficult or be unable to attract and retain qualified officers, directors and members of board committees required to provide for our effective management as a result of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has resulted in a series of rules and regulations by the SEC that increase responsibilities and liabilities of directors and executive officers. The perceived increased personal risk associated with these recent changes may make it more costly or deter qualified individuals from accepting these roles.

Legislation, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, may make it more difficult for us to retain or attract officers and directors.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was enacted in response to public concerns regarding corporate accountability in connection with recent accounting scandals. The stated goals of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act are to increase corporate responsibility, to provide for enhanced penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies, and to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures pursuant to the securities laws. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act generally applies to all companies that file or are required to file periodic reports with the SEC, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We are required to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has resulted in a series of rules and regulations by the SEC that increase responsibilities and liabilities of directors and executive officers. The perceived increased personal risk associated with these recent changes may deter qualified individuals from accepting these roles. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as executive officers. We continue to evaluate and monitor developments with respect to these rules, and we cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.

Provisions of our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws may delay or prevent a take-over that may not be in the best interests of our stockholders.

Provisions of our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws may be deemed to have anti-takeover effects, which include when and by whom special meetings of our stockholders may be called, and may delay, defer or prevent a takeover attempt.

You may have limited access to information regarding our business because our obligations to file periodic reports with the SEC could be automatically suspended under certain circumstances.

Because it has been more than one year since our initial Registration Statement was declared effective, our reporting obligations under the Securities Laws may (in our discretion) be automatically suspended by operation of statute under Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 if we have less than 300 shareholders and do not file a registration statement on Form 8A (of which we have no specific current plans to file). We currently have less than 300 shareholders, which means that we may file periodic reports voluntarily with the SEC but are no longer obligated to file those periodic reports with the SEC. Therefore, your access to our business information could be even more restricted.

We are not be required to furnish proxy statements to security holders, and our directors, officers and principal beneficial owners are not required to report their beneficial ownership of securities to the SEC pursuant to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 until we have both 500 or more security holders and greater than $10 million in assets and are required to register our shares under Section 12 of the Exchange Act. This means that your access to information regarding our business is and will likely continue to be limited.

21

---

 For all of the foregoing reasons and others set forth herein, an investment in the Company’s securities in any market which may develop in the future involves a high degree of risk. Any person considering an investment in such securities should be aware of these and other risk factors set forth in this Form 10-K.

For all of the foregoing reasons and others set forth herein, an investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk.

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

No shares were sold. 21,400,000 shares were issued upon the conversion of a portion of a Convertible Note Payable.

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4.  (Removed and Reserved)

Item 5.  Other Information

None

Item 6.  Exhibits and Reports of Form 8-K

(a)

Exhibits

31.1  Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

32.1  Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

HPC POS System. Corp.

(Registrant)

/s/ Melvin W. Coles

Melvin W. Coles

Title: President and Chief Financial Officer

February 17, 2011

22