Attached files

file filename
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - Source Gold Corp.ex31_1.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - Source Gold Corp.ex31_2.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - Source Gold Corp.ex32_1.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K /A

[X]
ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
 
For the fiscal year ended  July 31, 2010
   
[  ]
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
   
 
For the transition period from _________ to ________
   
 
Commission file number:  333-153881

Source Gold Corp.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Nevada
 N/A
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
2 Toronto Street, Suite 234
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
 
M5C 2B5
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
 
Registrant’s telephone number:  289-208-6664
 

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
 
Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
None
not applicable
 
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
 
Title of each class
 
None
 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ]       No [X]

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the proceeding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes [X] No [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Yes [X]       No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. [  ]

Large accelerated filer [  ] Accelerated filer [  ] Non-accelerated filer [  ] Smaller reporting company [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).   Yes [  ]   No [X]

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. Approx. $13,994,400 as of February 28, 2010.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.  49,159,265 as of October 18, 2010.
 
EXPLANATORY NOTE
 
This amendment is to correct disclosures related to involvement in certain legal proceedings to reference the past ten years as required by Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K, to include a properly signed audit report and to make certain corrections to Note 8 of the financial statements.
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
   
Page
 
PART I
 
3
17
21
21
25
25
 
PART II
 
25
30
30
31
32
33
33
33
 
PART III
 
34
37
39
40
41
 
PART IV
 
41
 
 
PART I
 
Item 1.   Business

Business of Company

We are an exploration stage company that intends to engage in the exploration of mineral properties.  We have acquired four mineral claims through our wholly owned subsidiaries Northern Bonanza, Inc., an Ontario corporation, (“Northern Bonanza”) and Source Bonanza, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, (“Source Bonanza”). None of these properties possesses known mineral reserves.  Exploration of these mineral claims is required before a final determination as to their viability can be made.

Northern Bonanza holds or possesses an option to acquire a partial interest in the following claims in Ontario, Canada:

·  
Southern Beardmore Claims
 
o  
A group of 21 mineral claims in Beardmore Area and Mary Jane Lake Area, 3 km south of Beardmore, Ontario, Canada.
 
·  
KRK West Claims
 
o  
Northern Bonanza either possesses, or holds an option to acquire an undivided 50% interest, in 16 mineral claims known as the KRK West Claims, located north of Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
 
Source Bonanza owns a 100% membership interest in Vulture Gold, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company.  Vulture Gold is the owner of the mineral rights to 27 unpatented mineral claims located in Maricopa County Arizona.

Description of Business.

Northern Bonanza, Inc.
 
Southern Beardmore Claims.
On May 4, 2010, we acquired a group of 21 contiguous mineral claims in the Beardmore Area and Mary Jane Lake Area, near Beardmore, Ontario for $51,800 (CDN).
 
Location and Means of Access to Southern Beardmore Claims.
The property consists of nineteen contiguous mineral claims.  The area of the property is 269 hectares. The northern boundary of the property is 3 kilometers south of Beardmore, Ontario on Highway11. Highway 11 transects the property. Old logging roads also cross the property.
Title to Southern Beardmore Claims.
We only hold the mineral rights to the Southern Beardmore Claims.  We do not possess surface rights to the property.  The claims all expire in May of 2012, subject to proper renewal. There are no royalties, back-in rights payments or other agreements and encumbrances to which the property is subject. Additionally, there are no environmental liabilities to which the property is subject or permits that must be acquired to conduct the work proposed.
 
 
Previous Operations on the Southern Beardmore Claims.
There have been no prior operations on these claims.
 
Present Condition of Southern Beardmore Claims.
At the moment there are no established mineralized zones, mineral resources, mineral reserves and mine workings, tailing ponds, waste deposits and important natural features and improvements, relative to the outside property boundaries.
 
Work Completed on the Southern Beardmore Claims.
No work has been completed on the claims with the exception of certain airborne survey work, discussed below.
 
Proposed and Current State of Exploration and Development on the Southern Beardmore Claims.
There is not currently any exploration on the property.  We retained a geologist to conduct a study and produce a report on the exploration potential of the property.  He had the following recommendation:

·  
A fixed-wing airborne survey should be flown over the property. An airborne electromagnetic signal should be sourced by VLF-EM signals. Magnetic and radiometric surveys should he flown on the same platform. The survey should be flown on E-W lines spaced at 50m intervals. The results of the survey would receive professional evaluation, which would guide ground follow-up prospecting, sampling and assaying in an attempt to isolate quartz-gold silver + sulphide veins.
 
The total recommended budget estimate for the foregoing is:
 
·    Fixed wing airborne survey $40,000
·    Evaluation, prospecting, sampling and assaying $20,000
·    Total  $60,000
 
In addition to the purchase price paid, we have incurred $17,436 in staking costs in relation to these claims.  During the year ended July 31, 2010 we advanced exploration totaling $47,086.  As of July 31, 2010, exploration expenditures totaled $20,118 resulting in net exploration advances having been made at July 31, 2010 of $26,968.  Our exploration expenditures during the year ended July 31, 2010 were focused on the recommended airborne survey of the Southern Beardmore property and on the preparation of a geological report on the property.
 
No Known Presence of Reserves on the Southern Beardmore Claims.
The proposed program is exploratory in nature and there are no known reserves on the property.
 
 
Rock Formations and Mineralization of Existing or Potential Economic Significance on the Southern Beardmore Claims.
Regionally a swath of metavolcanic-metasedimentary rocks runs from Geraldton to Beardmore. The metavolcanic rocks are host to numerous showings and former producers of gold and silver. A metasedimentary sequence consists of both clastic and chemical metasediments. These are rocks from two northeast trenching belts and occur to the northwest and southeast of the central volcanic belt. The northern belt is about 3.4 km thick; the southern belt is in excess of 5.4 km. The Northern Bonanza claim group lies entirely within the southern belt. The clastic melasediments are wackes with minor intercalated siltstone and mudstone. The chemical metasediments comprise ironstone units 1-2 m thick bedded in the metavolcanics. The metavolcanies comprise mafic to intermediate flows in a belt 2.0 to 2.5 km wide and trend northeasterly between the two metasedimentary units. The metavolcanic flows are dark green to greenish black in color and typically consist of a massive medium grained basal part, a finer middle portion and a fine-grained to aphanitic upper part, which may be pillowed, amygdaloidal and/or variolitic. Proterozoic rocks comprise diabase sills of medium grain size and massive texture and form topographic highs in outcrop. Precious metals occur (i) in quartz and quartz-carbonate veins almost exclusively in metavolcacanics but also in metasediments and (ii) in quartz veins in chert-hematite-magnelite-grunerite ironstone units interlaycled with the mafic metavolcanies.

The KRK West Claims
 
Location and Means of Access to KRK West Claims.  The property consists of 16 claims covering 15 square miles.  It is located north of Thunder Bay in the Beardmore area of Northwestern Ontario, Canada.  The nearest townships to the property are Pifher, Sandra, and Meade.   The property can be accessed Access via Hwy 11 through the Village of Beardmore to Hwy 801.
 
Title to KRK West Claims.
 
Option Agreement
On October 26, 2009, we entered into an agreement with Thunder Bay Minerals, Inc. (“Thunder Bay”) under which were granted an option to acquire an undivided 50% interest in 16 mineral claims known as the KRK West Claim, located north of Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.  We are currently in a dispute with Thunder Bay regarding the ownership of the claims.  The dispute is discussed more fully in the following section titled “Separate Purchase of KRK West Claims”.
 
Detailed below are the payments we have made to date and the payments we will be obligated to make in the future if the dispute with Thunder Bay is not resolved in our favor.

  
o Pay $110,000 (CDN) to Thunder Bay with $50,000 (CDN) of that amount due upon execution of the Agreement before commencing due diligence of the claims (paid) and the balance of $60,000 (CDN) on or before December 1, 2009 (paid);
 
 
  
o Incur $500,000 (CDN) in expenditures on the claims before December 31, 2010 and $500,000 in expenditures on the claims before December 31, 2011; and

 
o Issue 2,000,000 shares of our common stock to the shareholders of Thunder Bay within 30 days of closing the transaction.
 
On November 26, 2009 and December 7, 2009, we made payments of $31,785 (CDN) and $28,215 (CDN) respectively.
 
Under the agreement, Thunder Bay will act as operator and define the nature of and execute all exploration programs and subsequent phases of development on the claims.
 
If we are able to pay the consideration for the claims (as set forth above), we will be entitled to a 50% interest in the claims, which are currently subject to a 3% Net Smelter Royalty in favor of James Wheeler, President of Thunder Bay. In the event we acquire an interest in the claims, we and Thunder Bay have further agreed to enter into a joint venture agreement for further exploration and development of the claims.
 
Separate Purchase of KRK West Claims.
During the year, we learned that the optionor had allowed the KRK West Claims to lapse, and therefore the option agreement was null and void.  All 19 of the KRK West Claims were re-staked by a third party.  Together with our President, Lauren Notar, we were able to purchase 13 of the 19 KRK West Claims from the third party who re-staked the claims.  Ms. Notar contributed $20,000 toward the purchase and we contributed $7,578 in cash. The 13 claims were initially transferred to Ms. Notar.  Then, on June 30, 2010, Ms. Notar transferred the 13 claims to us in exchange for an unsecured non-interest bearing promissory note for $20,000 which falls due on November 30, 2010.   Our total purchase price for the 13 re-staked claims was therefore $27,578.  We also incurred exploration expenditures of $555 in relation to these claims.  Subsequent to our acquisition of the claims, they were transferred to our subsidiary Northern Bonanza.
 
The original optionor currently maintains that control of the KRK West Claims remains with the optionor and that we have no right to further explore the property.  We disagree with this assertion and accordingly ownership to the claims is in dispute.  On January 7, 2011 the Ministry of Northern Development, Mines and Forestry, Canada, will adjudicate upon the ownership of the claims.
 
Previous Operations on the KRK West Claims.
The KRK West property encompasses many previous prospects and occurrences that, since 1930, have been the subject of many prospecting, geophysics, and diamond drilling as well as high grading conducted by operators dating back between 1930-1950 where copper and gold mineralization was identified.
 
 
Present Condition of KRK West Claims.
At the moment there are no established mineralized zones, mineral resources, mineral reserves and mine workings, tailing ponds, waste deposits and important natural features and improvements, relative to the outside property boundaries.
 
Work Completed on the Claims and Proposed and Current State of Exploration and Development on the Claims.
We have undertaken an initial trenching, sampling, and geological mapping program on the KRK West Claims. The samples are being assayed by Accurassay Laboratories in Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
 
Based upon the initial exploration program of trenching, channel sampling, geological mapping and a TEM survey covering our claim group on over 15 square miles of the KRK West Property, we have identified three main areas of interest.

The first area of interest is the Little Brother Claim Group, where a number of samples were taken from an area along a northern grandiorite with intermediate volcanics, which yielded visible gold occurrences.

The second area of interest is close to the eastern portion of the property east of Peddle Lake. This area is the most active on the property where a number of drill collars belonging to a previous operator were drilled during the 1970's. The ground observations in the trenches and historical assessment have indicated a large disrupted zone carrying the potential for significant gold and silver values.

The third area of interest is the most westerly area of the property near Musca Lake, along a continuous shear zone. The Musca Lake zone consists of a quartz flooded shear which pinches and swells along its strike length.

Although we have no established an overall exploration budget for the KRK West claims at this time, we intend to continue with an exploration program centered on the major fault lines and areas of interest which traverse the KRK West mineral claims. Accurassay Laboratories is currently processing more than 250 trench samples from our three main areas of interest on the KRK West Property.

No Known Presence of Reserves on the KRK West Claims.
The proposed program is exploratory in nature and there are no established reserves on the property.

Rock Formations and Mineralization of Existing or Potential Economic Significance on the KRK West Claims.
The property is located within the Northern Felsic Metavolcanic Belt. Intermediate crystal-lithic tuff is the dominant rock type and underlies most of the property. These tuffs consist of intermixed units of crystal tuffs containing feldspar crystals and lithic tuffs containing fragments of felsic to intermediate composition. Felsic crystal tuffs are easily identified by the presence of quartz-eyes within a light gray crystal tuff. The rock weathers to a very distinctive porcellaneous buff-white color. The felsic crystal tuff forms two prominent east-west trending horizons within the intermediate crystal-lithic tuff in the southern half of the western portion of the property and can be traced to the western boundary. The felsic horizons vary in width from 25 to 120 meters, and can be traced for a length of 2.8 kilometers.
 
 
Gold occurs on the property associated with white quartz veins and pyritic horizons within felsic crystal tuffs and quartz-feldspar porphyry. Earlier exploration identified quartz veins and mineralized shear zones within felsic and mafic intrusions. Base and precious metals are found all over the property. The KRK West property encompasses many previous well known prospects and occurrences that since 1930 have been the subject of many prospecting, geophysics, and diamond drilling as well as high grading conducted by operators dating back between 1930-1950 where copper and gold mineralization was identified.

Source Bonanza, LLC.

Vulture Peak Property and Gold Point Claim Group.
On August 7, 2010, we entered into an agreement with Vulture Gold LLC (“Vulture”), to purchase 100% of Vulture’s outstanding membership interests in consideration for 4 million shares of our common stock. Vulture is the owner of the mineral rights to unpatented mineral claims located in Maricopa County Arizona known collectively as the Vulture Claims.  
 
Location and Means of Access to Vulture Claims.
The property is located approximately 15 km to 17 km southwest of Wickenburg in Maricopa County, Arizona. It consists of 27 claims located in Section(s) 23, 24, 25, 26, 35 and 36, T.6N., R.GW., and in Section(s) 3D, T.6N., R.5W., Maricopa County, Arizona. Each claim is approximately 20.7 acres with a total property area of 476.1 acres, configured in three separate blocks.
 
The property can be accessed from Wickenburg through Vulture Mine Road south from State Highway 60. Wickenburg is located 85 km (53 miles) NW of Phoenix; 98 km (61 miles) S of Prescott; and 206 km (128 miles) SE of Kingman. Wickenburg is connected with Phoenix through State Highway 60 south; and to Prescott and Kingman through State Highways 89 and 93 respectively. Wickenburg is one of the railway stations for Prescott- Phoenix branch of Santa Fe Railway. From Vulture Mine Road various gravel roads traverse through different areas of the property providing access to almost all the mineral claims.
 
Title to Vulture Claims.
The Vulture Claims are owned by Vulture Gold, LLC, which is owned 100% by Source Bonanza. The following claim maintenance fees are applicable for the property:
 
o  
Bureau of Land Management Claim Maintenance Fee = $ 125 per claim per year ($3,625 each year, due on or before September 1)
 
o  
Maricopa County Recorder "Notice of Intent to Hold" Fee = $104 per year (due on or before November 1).
 
A "Mineral Exploration Permit" application will be required to get a permit for the proposed exploration work to be carried out on the property. A minimum bond required is $3,000 but the actual bond amount is based upon the type of exploration and the degree of disturbance. The department responsible for issuing this is the Minerals Section of the Arizona State Land Department.  Additionally, the Arizona State Land Commissioner, at his discretion, may also change the amount of the damage and restoration bond when warranted by any changes in the Plan of Operation.
 
 
Previous Operations on the Vulture Claims.
The Vulture Claims were part of the historical Red Cloud Mine, Vulture Mine, Vulture Mine Extension, and Mohawk Mines. The first prospecting party to explore the mountains of north-central Arizona was guided by Pauline Veaver, a pioneer trapper and Indian Scout of the period. Henry Wickenburg, one of the party members, while prospecting south of Wickenburg located the Vulture lode in 1863. He established a camp on the Hassayampa River six miles east of the location, and for the next three years worked the richer parts of the outcrop ore. No records are available for his production.
 
In November 1, 1866, the Vulture Claims and adjoining area was acquired from Wickenburg by the Vulture Company of New York. This company established a camp at the mine, and built a forty stamp amalgamation and concentration mill at Wickenburg. This pioneer company operated steadily from 1867 to July 1872. Chinese Miners were employed. Concentrates were stored, and the production was in gold bullion saved on the plates. The property was closed due to excessive transportation costs and to the apparent pinching of the ore at water level.
 
In 1870 a new corporation was formed to operate the Vulture and Vulture Extension of Taylor and Smith. This company was known as the Arizona Central Mining Company. Vulture Extension property was reportedly located to the north of the Vulture Mine and is believed to be located on claim 1127 and 28, an area staked by Gold Point LLC.  An 80 stamp mill was built at the mine, and water was pumped from Hassayampa at Seymour, through a seven mile pipe line. Power was supplied by wood­burning boilers. Work was continued by this company for nine years on a large scale. A great deal of very low grade ore was treated. No exact figures are available on the production but scattered estimates of the Art one Daily Star and U.S. Mint reports indicate a probable gross of 3,000,000 ounces. The mine was worked down about 300 feet to a fault which cut off the ore body.
 
In 1908 the property was acquired by the Vulture Mines Company. This company at first used 20 stamps of the Arizona Central Company mill. In 1910 a new 20 stamp mill was erected driven by gasoline engine, which treated from 100 to 120 tons a day of ore. This company operated the mine up to 1917. The gross output of this company which worked on the faulted segment of ore was $1,839,375, 30 percent of which was concentrates and 70 percent bullion.
 
In 1927 D.R. Finlayson acquired the property and organized the Vulture Mining and Milling Company. A 5-stamp amalgamation mill was built at the mine using water pumped from the mine, power being supplied by Diesel engine. Old pillars were treated.
 
 
In 1929, a diamond drill campaign was started, after a careful geological study, to prospect for the second faulted segment of the ore. Vein matter carrying free gold was encountered. Financial help was enlisted from the United Verde Extension Mining Company of Jerome. In 1930 and 1931 an 800 foot shaft was sunk to prospect the ground cut by the drill. A large vein was encountered. After six months lateral work and a little drilling, work was abandoned.
 
Present Condition of Vulture Claims.
 
There are several areas of past producing mines and old workings located on the property. Detailed below are some of the old workings on the property.
 
·  
Red Cloud Mine
 
o  
This shaft is located at 0329733 E, 3745506 N at an elevation of 2,222 ft (692 m). The shaft area is fenced. Mine dump material is lying in the immediate surrounding area. Groundwater was observed in the shaft by throwing a piece of rock in the shaft and is estimated to be at a depth of 60 to 80 m below ground surface. Three old trenches were observed; two on the west and one on the east side along strike of this shaft.
 
·  
Red Cloud Mill and Shaft
 
o  
An old shaft, foundations of a stamp mill and an approximately 30 m long trench was observed at this location. A small dump of old milling material was also observed.
 
·  
Vulture Mine Extension
 
o  
This area is marked by the presence of a shaft, an abandoned mill site with remnants of hoist, head frame, ball mills, generator, etc. This area is located on Vulture claim at 0330263 E, 3744219 N with an elevation of 2162 ft (659 m). The shaft is fenced and was observed to be plugged with rock material at 6 to 7 m depth.
 
·  
Mohawk
 
o  
Gold Point claims 27-29 located immediately to the west of Vulture Mine private property were historically called Mohawk group of claims reportedly located 2 miles (3 km) to the west of historical Vulture and Black Hawk mines. Historical work done in this area included a shaft down to about 48 feet which passed through 24 feet of ledge matter.

 
10

 
Work Completed on the Vulture Claims.
We have not performed any work on the claims.
 
Proposed and Current State of Exploration and Development on the Vulture Claims. We have not carried out any exploration work on the property. However, on March 13, 2008 Gold Point LLC, the party that staked the current Vulture Claims, contracted Fred B. Brost, P.E. to carry out rock sampling on Red Cloud, Red Rock, and Vulture claims. A total of six samples were collected during this work at various locations. The samples were analyzed at Jacobs Assay Office in Tucson. Following receipt of the assay results, we retained a geologist to conduct a study and produce a report on the exploration potential of the property.  He recommended the following two stage exploration program:
 
Phase 1- Data Compilation, Geological Mapping, Trenching and Sampling
 
o  
This work should be completed in two stages. The first stage should include compilation of all the historical geological data available for property and putting it into a data base to generate several layers of maps in GIS format for further interpretation. This work will also include geo-referencing historical geological maps, sampling and trenching data, and collecting available historical production records from shafts and mines.
 
o  
In the second stage, the geological fieldwork program should be carried out. This program should include, geological mapping 1:5,000 scale, conducting systematic rock sampling on each claim, and trenching at selected locations. All the accessible old shafts should be studied and sampled in detail to understand the local mineralization trend and to get an insight into the type of ore historically mined. The intent of this work should be to define ground geophysical surveying targets for Phase 2 work Program.
 
The estimated cost of this program is $132,500, which would be expended as follows:

PHASE 1 BUDGET – GEOLOGICAL MAPPING, TRENCHING AND SAMPLING

Item
No. of Units
Rate
Total
Bonds and Permitting
1
$5,000
$5,000
Data Compilation
10
$500
$5,000
Maps production
1
$1,000
$1,000
Geological mapping (2 geologists)
21
$1,100
$23,100
Prospecting (Prospectors 2)
21
$900
$18,900
Assaying rock samples
500
$40
$20,000
Soil Samples
300
$40
$12,000
Excavator
10
$1,500
$15,000
Accommodation and Meals
50 Man days
$200
$10,000
Vehicles: 1
25
$100
$2,500
Supplies, Blasting Equipment and Rentals
Lump Sum
$10,000
$10,000
Reports
Lump Sum
$10,000
$10,000
TOTAL (CANADIAN DOLLARS)
   
$132,500
 
 
Phase 2 - Ground Geophysical Surveying, Diamond Drilling
 
Based on the results of Phase 1 program, the following ground geophysical surveys should be carried out at suitable locations: 3D Induced Polarization (IP), Magnetometer Survey and Electromagnetic (EM) - VLF Survey

o  
The IP technique will help in measuring the amount of disseminated metallic sulphides in the underlying porphyritic rocks and quartz veins.  This technique energizes the ground surface with an alternating square wave pulsar via a pair of current electrodes and the IP effect is measured as a time diminishing voltage at the receiver electrodes.
 
o  
The very-low frequency (VLF) EM method will help to detect any subsurface conducting zone by utilizing radio signals in the 15 to 30 kilohertz (kH) range that are used for military communications.
 
o  
Magnetometer survey measures the earth's magnetic field which can be influenced due to presence of magnetic or relatively non-magnetic rocks in the survey area. This survey will be helpful in identifying gold bearing zones associated with pyrrhotite or magnetite depleted porphyry type copper-gold mineralization. In some property areas with potential for porphyry copper-gold type ore bodies the mineralizing fluids might have destroyed the magnetite associated with the original intrusive or volcanic rocks. Magnetic surveys would outline positive magnetic anomalies over the unaltered rock formations. The exploration target would be the relatively magnetic lows within these formations where magnetite has altered to a non-magnetic mineral, such as pyrite.
 
o  
The geophysical survey is initially recommended to be carried out at 50 m x 50 m grid on selected areas within the following claim blocks: Red Cloud, Vulture Extension Mohawk.
 
o  
The type of geophysical survey on each claim would depend on the style of mineralization. This work will help to define the trends and continuity of the anomalous surface mineralization and locate targets for drilling. A 10 to 15 drill hole program for up to 2,000 m diamond drilling is proposed which will be contingent upon the findings of Phase 1 program and geophysical surveys.
 
Estimated cost of Phase 2 work program is $522,000, which would be expended as follows:

 
PHASE 2 BUDGET – GROUND GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYING, DIAMOND DRILLING

Item
No. of Units
Rate
Total
Bond and permitting
1
$10,000
$10,000
Geologist
10
$600
$6,000
Geophysical Survey Induced Polarization
42
$2,000
$84,000
Magnetometer, EM-VLF Survey Crew
28
$1,200
$33,600
Diamond Core Drilling (m), if warranted
2,000
$150
$300,000
Accommodation and Meals
200
$200
$40,000
Vehicles: 2 – 4x4 truck
20
$200
$4,000
Supplies and Rentals
Lump Sum
$10,000
$10,000
Data Interpretation
Lump Sum
$20,000
$20,000
Reports
Lump Sum
$15,000
$15,000
TOTAL (CANADIAN DOLLARS)
   
$522,600
 
No Known Presence of Reserves on the Vulture Claims.  The proposed program is exploratory in nature and there are no known reserves on the property.

Rock Formations and Mineralization of Existing or Potential Economic Significance on the Vulture Claims. Mineralization on the claims and adjoining areas can be classified into three types: i) mineralized veins, ii) porphyritic masses of rock, iii) mixed deposits In which veins and porphyry are both present.
 
Mineralized Veins.  Fractures filled with quartz and other veining material was observed at places on the claims but no strong or regular veins were located. Most of the veins are at the contact of volcanics and metasediments. Gold, silver and other metals may concentrate in quartz veins and in silicified and altered rocks. Some irregular quartz veins were observed in schistose rocks where vein filling occur mainly along the cleavage of schist.
 
Porphyritic Masses of Rock. At many places quartz monzonite volcanic dykes were observed containing pyrite in disseminated crystalline grains with in porphyritic masses of rocks. The distribution of this sulphide looks like independent of fractures or fracture filling. Moderate to severe alteration of dykes and wall rocks has converted feldspar and mafic minerals to a fine­ grained sericite, hematite, and clay minerals. Altered dyke rocks commonly consist of quartz "eyes" in a fine-grained matrix of alteration minerals. Conceptual restoration of the rocks of the Vulture mine area to their pre-rotations orientation reveals that the mineralization and alteration originally occurred along a north-northeast-trending subvertical dyke that projected upward from the structural top of a Cretaceous granitoid pluton. The association of gold with dyke and gradation of the dyke into the granitic rocks of the pluton indicate that gold mineralization was intimately related to Cretaceous magmatism and dyke emplacement. Later erosion and subsequent burial by lower Miocene volcanic rocks was followed by structural dismemberment and tilting and eventual uncovering by late Cenozoic erosion.
 
 
Mixed Mineralization. Combined veining and porphyritic style of mineralization was observed to be a common feature especially on Gold Point Vulture claim and Gold Point claims 27-29 located in the southwestern part of the property. Granitoid rocks are intersected by porphyritic volcanic rocks in these areas. Hematitic alteration is common and covers large areas at the contact of granite and volcanic dykes.

Competition

The mineral exploration industry, in general, is intensely competitive and even if commercial quantities of reserves are discovered, a ready market may not exist for the sale of the reserves.

Most companies operating in this industry are more established and have greater resources to engage in the production of mineral claims.  We were incorporated on June 4, 2008 and our operations are not well-established.  Our resources at the present time are limited.  We may exhaust all of our resources and be unable to complete full exploration of our various claims.  There is also significant competition to retain qualified personnel to assist in conducting mineral exploration activities.   If a commercially viable deposit is found to exist and we are unable to retain additional qualified personnel, we may be unable to enter into production and achieve profitable operations.  These factors set forth above could inhibit our ability to compete with other companies in the industry and enter into production of the mineral claim if a commercial viable deposit is found to exist.

Numerous factors beyond our control may affect the marketability of any substances discovered.  These factors include market fluctuations, the proximity and capacity of natural resource markets and processing equipment, government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection.  The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.

Compliance with Government Regulation

Canada.
The main agency that governs the exploration of minerals in the Province of Ontario is the Ontario Ministry of Northern Development, Mines and Forestry.

The Ontario Ministry of Northern Development, Mines and Forestry manages the development of Ontario’s mineral resources, and implements policies and programs respecting their development while protecting the environment. In addition, the Ministry regulates and inspects the exploration and mineral production industries in Ontario to protect workers, the public and the environment.
 
The material legislation applicable to us is the Ontario Mining Act. In order to prospect on Crown lands in Ontario or stake out, record or apply to record the staking of a mining claim, a person must be a holder of a prospector's license issued under the Ontario Mining Act. In order to obtain a license an application is made to the nearest Mining Lands office or other offices offering Mining Lands services of the Ministry of Northern Development, Mines and Forestry.  Although a license is required for prospecting, unlicensed parties can perform pre-exploration activities including: geophysical/geochemical surveys, airborne geophysical surveys, limited stripping and trenching, limited bulk sampling and various forms of drilling can be conducted without a license.
 
 
Prospecting or preliminary exploration may require the following permits and approvals:

o  
Provincial permits associated with use of Crown land for road building, water crossings, tree cutting, burning of materials or approach to a Provincial highway. In addition, some of the permits required for activity on Crown land may require a limited Environmental Assessment;
 
o  
Federal approvals for crossing a watercourse designated as navigable; work near or within waters that are fish habitat; exploration on First Nation Reserve land; or purchase and possession of explosives; and
 
o  
Municipal approvals for potential changes in land use, and sometimes for burning of materials.
 
If we progress past the exploration stage then the next three main stages in the development of a mining project are advanced exploration, development, operations and closures. At such point in time as we move closer towards realizing each stage we will provide the major regulatory and permitting requirements to be taken into consideration

In order to hold a claim in good standing or to apply for a lease, exploration work (referred to as assessment work) must be performed and reported to the Crown for approval, within specified time limits.  Qualifying assessment activities fall into two categories, those performed with 12 months prior to the recording of mining claims and those performed after the recording of mining claims.  Activities in the former category are regional surveys such as airborne geophysics and regional or reconnaissance ground exploration and prospecting by a holder of a valid prospector’s license.  Activities in the latter category include prospecting and physical work such as manual, mechanical overburden stripping and bedrock trenching and shaft sinking, driving adits and open cuttings.

We have a total of 19 claims scheduled to expire in April 2012, including the 13 KRK West claims which we have re-purchased and the additional 6 claims which remain in dispute.  We estimate that a total of $104,400 in assessment work must be conducted before that date in order to maintain the claims in good standing.  In addition, we have a total of 19 claims scheduled to expire in May of 2012.  We estimate that a total of $107,600 in assessment work must be conducted before that date in order to maintain the claims in good standing.

United States.
The exploration, drilling and mining industries in the United States operate in a legal environment that requires permits to conduct virtually all operations.   A Mineral Exploration Permit application will be required to get a permit for the proposed exploration work to be carried out on the Vulture Claims. The department responsible for issuing this is the Minerals Section of the Arizona State Land Department (the “ALSD”).
 
An exploration permit is valid for one (1) year, renewable up to five (5) years.  An Exploration Plan of Operation must be submitted annually and approved by the ASLD prior to startup of exploration activities. A minimum bond required is $3,000 but the actual bond amount is based upon the type of exploration and the degree of disturbance. The State Land Commissioner, an Arizona official, at his discretion, may also change the amount of the damage and restoration bond when warranted by any changes in the Plan of Operation.

Once a permit is issued then there are minimum expenditure requirements.  If no work was completed on-site, the applicant can pay the equal amount to the department. An exploration permit does not permit its holder to conduct mining operations.  If discovery of a valuable mineral deposit is made, then the permitee must apply for a mineral lease before actual mining activities can begin.
 

Employees

We have no employees as of the date of this report other than our president and CEO, Ms. Notar. We conduct our business largely through agreements with consultants and other independent third party vendors. We do not anticipate hiring additional employees over the next twelve months.

Research and Development Expenditures

We have not incurred any research or development expenditures since our incorporation.

Environmental Laws

With the exception of the regulations discussed above, we have not incurred and do not anticipate incurring any expenses associated with environmental laws during the currently planned exploratory phases of our operations.

Subsidiaries

We do not have any subsidiaries other than Northern Bonanza, Inc., an Ontario corporation, and Source Bonanza, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company and IRC Exploration, Ltd., an Alberta Corporation.

Patents and Trademarks

We do not own, either legally or beneficially, any patent or trademark.
 

Item 1A.   Risk Factors.

If we do not obtain additional financing, our planned exploration activities will be delayed and we may be unable to implement our business plan.

We currently have cash in the amount of $52,147 and a working capital deficit of $21,938. We will require significant additional cash to complete the proposed exploration programs on our various mining properties. Our business plan calls for ongoing expenses in connection with exploring and developing our mineral properties. Accordingly, we must seek additional financing to fund our planned operations. Such additional funds may be raised through the issuance of equity, debt, convertible debt or similar securities that may have rights or preferences senior to those of our common stock. If financing adequate to fund our planned exploration activities cannot be secured, we will be required to limit our operations and the execution of our business plan will be significantly delayed.  There can be no assurance that such additional financing, when and if necessary, will be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all.

Because our auditor has issued a going concern opinion regarding our company, there is an increased risk associated with an investment in our company

We have earned $0 of revenue since our inception, which makes it difficult to evaluate whether we will operate profitably.  Operating expenses for the period from June 4, 2008 (date of inception) to July 31, 2010, totaled $5,579,313.   We have not attained profitable operations and are dependent upon obtaining financing or generating revenue from operations to continue operations for the next twelve months. As of July 31, 2010, we had $52,147 in cash.

Our future is dependent upon our ability to obtain financing or upon future profitable operations.  We reserve the right to seek additional funds through private placements of our common stock and/or through debt financing. Our ability to raise additional financing is unknown. We do not have any formal commitments or arrangements for the advancement or loan of funds. For these reasons, our auditors stated in their report that they have substantial doubt we will be able to continue as a going concern. As a result, there is an increased risk that you could lose the entire amount of your investment in our company.

Because we have only a limited operating history, we face a high risk of business failure.

We have not completed exploration on any of our mining claims. As a result, we have no way to evaluate the likelihood that we will be able to operate the business successfully.  We were incorporated on June 4, 2008, and to date have been involved primarily in early stage exploration of the aforementioned mining claims.  A significant amount of additional exploration is necessary prior to determining the viability of the claims.  We have not earned any revenues as of the date of this prospectus, and thus face a high risk of business failure.

Because our executive officers do not have any training specific to the technicalities of mineral exploration, there is a higher risk our business will fail.

Ms. Lauren Notar, our president and director, does not have any training as a geologist or an engineer.  As a result, our management may lack certain skills that are advantageous in managing an exploration company. In addition, Ms. Notar’s decisions and choices may not take into account standard engineering or managerial approaches mineral exploration companies commonly use. Consequently, our operations, earnings, and ultimate financial success could suffer irreparable harm due to management’s lack of experience in geology and engineering.
 

Because we conduct our business through verbal agreements with consultants and arms-length third parties, there is a substantial risk that such persons may not be readily available to us and the implementation of our business plan could be impaired.

We have verbal agreements with our consulting geologists on the respective properties that require them to review all of the results from the exploration work performed on such properties and then make recommendations based upon those results. In addition, we have a verbal agreement with our accountants to perform requested financial accounting services and a written agreement with our outside auditors to perform auditing functions.  Each of these functions requires the services of persons in high demand and these persons may not always be available.  The implementation of our business plan may be impaired if these parties do not perform in accordance with our verbal agreement.  In addition, it may be difficult to enforce a verbal agreement in the event that any of these parties fail to perform.

Because of the unique difficulties and uncertainties inherent in the mineral exploration business, we face a high risk of business failure.

Potential investors should be aware of the difficulties normally encountered by new mineral exploration companies and the high rate of failure of such enterprises.  The likelihood of success must be considered in light of the problems, expenses, difficulties, complications and delays encountered in connection with the exploration of the mineral properties that we plan to undertake. These potential problems include, but are not limited to, unanticipated problems relating to exploration, and additional costs and expenses that may exceed current estimates. The search for valuable minerals also involves numerous hazards.  As a result, we may become subject to liability for such hazards, including pollution, cave-ins and other hazards against which we cannot insure or against which we may elect not to insure.  At the present time, we have no coverage to insure against these hazards. The payment of such liabilities may have a material adverse effect on our financial position.  In addition, there is no assurance that the expenditures to be made by us in the exploration of the mineral claims will result in the discovery of mineral deposits.  Problems such as unusual or unexpected formations and other conditions are involved in mineral exploration and often result in unsuccessful exploration efforts.

Because we anticipate our operating expenses will increase prior to our earning revenues, we may never achieve profitability.

Prior to completion of our exploration stage, we anticipate that we will incur increased operating expenses without realizing any revenues.  We expect to incur continuing and significant losses into the foreseeable future.  As a result of continuing losses, we may exhaust all of our resources and be unable to complete the exploration of all the claims that we own.  Our accumulated deficit will continue to increase as we continue to incur losses.  We may not be able to earn profits or continue operations if we are unable to generate significant revenues from the exploration of the mineral claims if we exercise our option.  There is no history upon which to base any assumption as to the likelihood that we will be successful, and we may not be able to generate any operating revenues or ever achieve profitable operations.  If we are unsuccessful in addressing these risks, our business will most likely fail.
 

Because, Ms Lauren Notar holds an option to purchase 40.68% of our outstanding common stock, investors may find that corporate decisions influenced by Ms. Notar are inconsistent with the best interests of other stockholders.

Ms. Notar holds an option to purchase 44.29% of the Company’s outstanding stock from our former president and CEO, Mr. Harry Bygdnes.  If Ms. Notar exercises this option and purchases all of the stock thereunder, she will have a significant influence in determining the outcome of all corporate transactions or other matters, including mergers, consolidations and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, and also the power to prevent or cause a change in control. While we have no current plans with regard to any merger, consolidation or sale of substantially all of its assets, the interests of Ms. Notar may still differ from the interests of the other stockholders.

Because our sole officer and director, Ms Lauren Notar, holds an option to purchase 44.29% of our outstanding common stock, the market price of our shares would most likely decline if she exercised the option to purchase 40.68% of the outstanding stock and then were to sell a substantial number of those shares all at once or in large blocks.

Our sole officer and director, Ms Lauren Notar holds an option to purchase 20,000,000 shares of our common stock which equates to approximately 40.68% of our outstanding common stock.  Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”), which is sponsored by FINRA. The OTCBB is a network of security dealers who buy and sell stock. The dealers are connected by a computer network that provides information on current "bids" and "asks", as well as volume information. Our shares are quoted on the OTCBB under the symbol “SRGL.” The offer or sale of a large number of shares at any price may cause the market price to fall.  Sales of substantial amounts of common stock or the perception that such transactions could occur, may materially and adversely affect prevailing markets prices for our common stock.

If we are unable to successfully compete within the mineral exploration business, we will not be able to achieve profitable operations.

The mineral exploration business is highly competitive.  This industry has a multitude of competitors and no small number of competitors dominates this industry with respect to any of the large volume metallic minerals.  Our exploration activities will be focused on attempting to locate commercially viable mineral deposits on our current claims.  Many of our competitors have greater financial resources than us.  As a result, we may experience difficulty competing with other businesses when conducting mineral exploration activities on the claims.  If we are unable to retain qualified personnel to assist us in conducting mineral exploration activities on our claims, even if a commercially viable deposit is found to exist, we may be unable to enter into production and achieve profitable operations.

Because of factors beyond our control which could affect the marketability of any substances found, we may be difficulty selling any substances we discover.

Even if commercial quantities of reserves are discovered, a ready market may not exist for the sale of the reserves. Numerous factors beyond our control may affect the marketability of any substances discovered.  These factors include market fluctuations, the proximity and capacity of natural resource markets and processing equipment, and government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals, and environmental protection.  These factors could inhibit our ability to sell minerals in the event that commercial amounts of minerals are found.

 
Risks Related To Legal Uncertainty

Because we will be subject to compliance with government regulation which may change, the anticipated costs of our exploration program may increase.

There are several governmental regulations that materially restrict mineral exploration or exploitation.  We may be required to obtain work permits, post bonds and perform remediation work for any physical disturbance to the land in order to comply with these regulations.  Currently, we have not experienced any difficulty with compliance of any laws or regulations which affect our business.  While our planned exploration program budgets for regulatory compliance, there is a risk that new regulations could increase our costs of doing business, prevent us from carrying out our exploration program, and make compliance with new regulations unduly burdensome.

If Native land claims affect the title to our mineral claims, our ability to prospect the mineral claims may be lost.

We are unaware of any outstanding native land claims on our Canadian claims.  Notwithstanding, it is possible that a native land claim could be made in the future. The federal and provincial government policy is at this time is to consult with all potentially affected native bands and other stakeholders in the area of any potential commercial production. In the event that we encounter a situation where a native person or group claims an interest in one of our Canadian claims, we may be unable to provide compensation to the affected party in order to continue with our exploration work, or if such an option is not available, we may have to relinquish any interest that we may have in this claim. The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that both the federal and provincial governments in Canada are obliged to negotiate these matters in good faith with native groups and at no cost to us. Notwithstanding, the costs and/or losses could be greater than our financial capacity and our business would fail.

Because legislation, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, increases the cost of compliance with federal securities regulations as well as the risks of liability to officers and directors, we may find it more difficult for us to retain or attract officers and directors.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was enacted in response to public concerns regarding corporate accountability in connection with recent accounting scandals. The stated goals of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act are to increase corporate responsibility, to provide for enhanced penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies, and to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures pursuant to the securities laws. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act generally applies to all companies that file or are required to file periodic reports with the SEC, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Upon becoming a public company, we will be required to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and it is costly to remain in compliance with the federal securities regulations.  Additionally, we may be unable to attract and retain qualified officers, directors and members of board committees required to provide for our effective management as a result of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has resulted in a series of rules and regulations by the SEC that increase responsibilities and liabilities of directors and executive officers. The perceived increased personal risk associated with these recent changes may make it more costly or deter qualified individuals from accepting these roles.  Significant costs incurred as a result of becoming a public company could divert the use of finances from our operations resulting in our inability to achieve profitability.
 

Risks Related To Our Common Stock

Because the market may respond to our business operations and that of our competitors, our stock price will likely be volatile.

Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”), which is sponsored by FINRA. The OTCBB is a network of security dealers who buy and sell stock. The dealers are connected by a computer network that provides information on current "bids" and "asks", as well as volume information. Our shares are quoted on the OTCBB under the symbol “SRGL.” We anticipate that the market price of our Common Stock will be subject to wide fluctuations in response to several factors, including: our ability to develop projects successfully; increased competition from competitors; and our financial condition and results of our operations.

Because we are subject to the “Penny Stock” rules, the level of trading activity in our stock may be reduced.

Broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in "penny stocks" are regulated by penny stock rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 (other than securities registered on some national securities exchanges or quoted on Nasdaq). The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document that provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, and, if the broker-dealer is the sole market maker, the broker-dealer must disclose this fact and the broker-dealer's presumed control over the market, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account. In addition, broker-dealers who sell these securities to persons other than established customers and "accredited investors" must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction. Consequently, these requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity, if any, in the secondary market for a security subject to the penny stock rules, and investors in our common stock may find it difficult to sell their shares.

As our shares are quoted on the over-the-counter bulletin board, we are required to remain current in our filings with the SEC and our securities will not be eligible for quotation if we are not current in our filings with the SEC.

Because our shares are quoted on the over-the-counter bulletin board, we are required to remain current in our filings with the SEC in order for shares of our common stock to be eligible for quotation on the over-the-counter bulletin board.  In the event that we become delinquent in our required filings with the SEC, quotation of our common stock will be terminated following a 30 day grace period if we do not make our required filing during that time.  If our shares are not eligible for quotation on the over-the-counter bulletin board, investors in our common stock may find it difficult to sell their shares.

Item 1B.   Unresolved Staff Comments

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 2.   Properties

We do not lease or own any real property other than our mineral claims. Our executive and head office is located at 2 Toronto Street, Suite 234, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5C 2B5. We believe our current premises are adequate for our current operations and we do not anticipate that we will require any additional premises in the foreseeable future.  When and if we require additional space, we intend to move at that time.
 

Southern Beardmore Claims

The Southern Beardmore property consists of a group of 21 contiguous mineral claims in the Beardmore Area and Mary Jane Lake Area, near Beardmore, Ontario The area of the property is 269 hectares. The northern boundary of the property is 3 kilometers south of Beardmore, Ontario on Highway11.

graphic1

KRK West Claims

The KRK West property consists of 19 claims covering 15 square miles. It is located north of Thunder Bay in the Beardmore area of Northwestern Ontario, Canada.

graphic2

Vulture Peak Claims

The Vulture Peak property is located approximately 15 km to 17 km southwest of Wickenburg in Maricopa County, Arizona. It consists of 23 claims located in Section(s) 23, 24, 25, 26, 35 and 36, T.6N., R.GW., and in Section(s) 3D, T.6N., R.5W., Maricopa County, Arizona. Each claim is approximately 20.7 acres with a total property area of 476.1 acres, configured in three separate blocks.

graphic3

Item 3.   Legal Proceedings

On October 26, 2009, we entered into an agreement with Thunder Bay Minerals, Inc. (“Thunder Bay”) under which we were granted an option to acquire an undivided 50% interest in 19 mineral claims known as the KRK West Claim, located north of Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.  During the year we learned that Thunder Bay had allowed the KRK West Claims to lapse, and therefore the option agreement was null and void.  As discussed above, we were able to re-purchase 13 of the 19 KRK West Claims from persons who re-staked the claims for an aggregate amount of $27,578.  We also incurred exploration expenditures of $555 in relation to these claims.  Subsequent to acquisition of the claims they were transferred to our wholly owned subsidiary, Northern Bonanza, Inc.

Thunder Bay currently maintains that control of the KRK West Claims remains with it and that we have no right to further explore the property.  We disagree with this assertion and accordingly ownership to the claims is in dispute.  On January 7, 2011 the Ministry of Northern Development, Mines and Forestry, Canada, will adjudicate upon the ownership of the claims.

Other than the foregoing, we are not a party to any pending legal proceeding. We are not aware of any pending legal proceeding to which any of our officers, directors, or any beneficial holders of 5% or more of our voting securities are adverse to us or have a material interest adverse to us.

Item 4.   (Removed and Reserved)
PART II

Item 5.    Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”), which is sponsored by FINRA. The OTCBB is a network of security dealers who buy and sell stock. The dealers are connected by a computer network that provides information on current "bids" and "asks", as well as volume information. Our shares are quoted on the OTCBB under the symbol “SRGL.OB.”

The following table sets forth the range of high and low bid quotations for our common stock for each of the periods indicated as reported by the OTCBB. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

Fiscal Year Ending July 31, 2010
Quarter Ended
 
High $
 
Low $
July 31, 2010
 
1.87
 
0.44
April 30, 2010
 
2.0
 
0.60
February 28, 2010
 
1.24
 
0.51
October 31, 2009
 
0.55
 
0.0

Fiscal Year Ending July 31, 2009
Quarter Ended
 
High $
 
Low $
July 31, 2009
 
0.0
 
0.0
April 30, 2009
 
0.0
 
0.0
February 28, 2009
 
0.0
 
0.0
October 31, 2008
 
0.0
 
0.0


Penny Stock

The SEC has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks are generally equity securities with a market price of less than $5.00, other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC, that: (a) contains a description of the nature and level of risk in the market for penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary trading; (b) contains a description of the broker's or dealer's duties to the customer and of the rights and remedies available to the customer with respect to a violation of such duties or other requirements of the securities laws; (c) contains a brief, clear, narrative description of a dealer market, including bid and ask prices for penny stocks and the significance of the spread between the bid and ask price; (d) contains a toll-free telephone number for inquiries on disciplinary actions; (e) defines significant terms in the disclosure document or in the conduct of trading in penny stocks; and (f) contains such other information and is in such form, including language, type size and format, as the SEC shall require by rule or regulation.

The broker-dealer also must provide, prior to effecting any transaction in a penny stock, the customer with (a) bid and offer quotations for the penny stock; (b) the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction; (c) the number of shares to which such bid and ask prices apply, or other comparable information relating to the depth and liquidity of the market for such stock; and (d) a monthly account statement showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account.

In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written acknowledgment of the receipt of a risk disclosure statement, a written agreement as to transactions involving penny stocks, and a signed and dated copy of a written suitability statement.

These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity for our common stock. Therefore, stockholders may have difficulty selling our securities.
 
 
Holders of Our Common Stock

As of October 18, 2010, we had 49,159,265 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding, held by 48 shareholders of record.

Common Stock

Our authorized capital stock consists of 180,000,000 shares of common stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share, and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share. As of October 18, 2010 there were 49,159,265 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding.   We have not issued any shares of preferred stock.

Voting Rights

Holders of common stock have the right to cast one vote for each share of stock in his or her own name on the books of the corporation, whether represented in person or by proxy, on all matters submitted to a vote of holders of common stock, including the election of directors.  There is no right to cumulative voting in the election of directors.  Except where a greater requirement is provided by statute or by the Articles of Incorporation, or by the Bylaws, the presence, in person or by proxy duly authorized, of the holder or holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the our common voting stock shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The vote by the holders of a majority of such outstanding shares is also required to effect certain fundamental corporate changes such as liquidation, merger or amendment of the Company's Articles of Incorporation.
  
Dividends

There are no restrictions in our articles of incorporation or bylaws that prevent us from declaring dividends.  The Nevada Revised Statutes, however, do prohibit us from declaring dividends where after giving effect to the distribution of the dividend:

1. we would not be able to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business, or;

2. our total assets would be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed to satisfy the rights of shareholders who have preferential rights superior to those receiving the distribution.

We have not declared or paid any dividends and we do not plan to declare any dividends in the foreseeable future.

Pre-emptive Rights

Holders of common stock are not entitled to pre-emptive or subscription or conversion rights, and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the Common Stock. All outstanding shares of common stock are, and the shares of common stock offered hereby will be when issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
 

Share Purchase Warrants

We have not issued and do not have outstanding any warrants to purchase shares of our common stock.

Options

We have not issued and do not have outstanding any options to purchase shares of our common stock.

Convertible Securities

We have not issued and do not have outstanding any securities convertible into shares of our common stock or any rights convertible or exchangeable into shares of our common stock.

Transfer Agent

Our transfer agent is Empire Stock Transfer Inc., 1859 Whitney Mesa Drive, Henderson, Nevada  89014.

Nevada Anti-Takeover Laws

Nevada Revised Statutes sections 78.378 to 78.379 provide state regulation over the acquisition of a controlling interest in certain Nevada corporations unless the articles of incorporation or bylaws of the corporation provide that the provisions of these sections do not apply.  Our articles of incorporation and bylaws do not state that these provisions do not apply.  The statute creates a number of restrictions on the ability of a person or entity to acquire control of a Nevada company by setting down certain rules of conduct and voting restrictions in any acquisition attempt, among other things. The statute is limited to corporations that are organized in the state of Nevada and that have 200 or more stockholders, at least 100 of whom are stockholders of record and residents of the State of Nevada; and does business in the State of Nevada directly or through an affiliated corporation. Because of these conditions, the statute currently does not apply to our company.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

During the quarter and year ended July 31, 2010, we had the following sale of unregistered securities:
 
o  
On June 16, 2010, the Company issued 105,932 common shares at $1.18 per share to Greenshoe Investment Ltd. for total proceeds of $125,000 pursuant to a private placement. We completed this offering pursuant Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933.
 
 
Subsequent to the quarter and year ended July 31, 2010, we had the following sale of unregistered securities:
 
o  
On August 7, 2010, we entered into an agreement with Vulture Gold LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (“Vulture”), to purchase One Hundred percent (100%) of Vulture’s outstanding membership interests in consideration for 4,000,000 shares of our common stock. The sellers of the membership interests in Vulture were Aravis Investments, Ltd., and Somerset Management, Ltd.  Each of the selling parties sold a 50% membership interest in Vulture in exchange for 2,000,000 shares of our common stock.  We completed this offering pursuant Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933.
 
In addition to the foregoing sales, since our inception, we have had the following previously reported sale of unregistered securities:
 
o  
On June 16, 2008, the Company issued 24,000,000 common shares to the Company’s former president, Mr. Harry Bygdnes, at $0.002 per share for total proceeds of $48,000. These shares were issued pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and are restricted shares as defined in the Securities Act.  

o  
On July 31, 2008, the Company issued 20,400,000 common shares at $0.0035 per share for total proceeds of $71,400 pursuant to a private placement.  The Company paid commissions of $7,025 for net proceeds of $64,375. We completed this offering pursuant Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933. The identity of the purchasers from this offering was included in the selling shareholder table set forth on Form S-1 filed by us on October 7, 2008.  
 
o  
On October 26, 2009, the Company issued 200,000 common shares to Somerset Management at $0.25 per share for total proceeds of $50,000 pursuant to a private placement.  We completed this offering pursuant Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933.

o  
On October 30, 2009, the Company issued 200,000 common shares to Murrayfield Limited at $0.25 per share for total proceeds of $50,000 pursuant to a private placement.  We completed this offering pursuant Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933.

o  
On November 26, 2009, the Company issued 100,000 common shares at $1.00 per share to Valcorine Capital for total proceeds of $100,000 pursuant to a private placement. We completed this offering pursuant Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933.
 
o  
On March 5, 2010, the Company issued 120,000 common shares at $1.00 per share for total proceeds of $120,000 pursuant to a private placement. We completed this offering pursuant Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933.
 
o  
On April 30, 2010, the Company issued 33,333 common shares at $1.50 per share to Greenshoe Investment Ltd. for total proceeds of $50,000 pursuant to a private placement. We completed this offering pursuant Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933.
 
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

We do not have any equity compensation plans.
 

Item 6.   Selected Financial Data

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives, and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe-harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse affect on our operations and future prospects on a consolidated basis include, but are not limited to: changes in economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, availability of capital, interest rates, competition, and generally accepted accounting principles. These risks and uncertainties should also be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Further information concerning our business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included herein and in our other filings with the SEC.

Results of Operations for the years ended July 31, 2010 and 2009 and period from June 4, 2008 (inception) to July 31, 2010

We generated no revenue for the years ended July 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the period from June 4, 2008 (Date of Inception) until July 31, 2010. We do not anticipate earning revenues until such time that we enter into commercial production of our claims.  We are presently in the exploration stage of our business and we can provide no assurance that we will discover commercially exploitable levels of mineral resources on any of our claims, or if such resources are discovered, that we will enter into commercial production.
 
Our operating expenses for the years ended July 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the period from June 4, 2008 (Date of Inception) until July 31, 2010, were $5,546,420, $102,804 and $5,579,313, respectively.  The primary operating expenses for the year ended July 31, 2010, consisted of mineral property option and acquisition costs of $199,894, legal fees of $120,330, management fees of $54,569, mineral property exploration costs of $52,200 and accounting and audit fees of $47,426. Our largest operating expense for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010, however, was an expense in the amount of $4,950,000 ac cured as a result of options to purchase common stock granted from our former president to our current president.  The primary operating expenses for the year ended July 31, 2009, consisted of accounting and audit fees of $32,397, legal fees of $27,442, mineral property exploration costs of $16,685 and management fees of 12,000.  
 
We recorded a net loss of $5,467,420, $102,804 and $5,579,313, for the years ended July 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the period from June 4, 2008 (Date of Inception) until July 31, 2010, respectively.
 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of July 31, 2010, we had total current assets of $79,115, consisting of $52,147 in cash and $26,968 in exploration advances.  We had $101,053 in current liabilities as of July 31, 2010. Thus, we had a working capital deficit of $21,938 as of July 31, 2010.

Net cash used in operating activities was $421,024, $107,086 and $542,385 for the years ended July 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the period from June 4, 2008 (Date of Inception) to July 31, 2009, respectively. Our main source of cash has been from the sale of our common stocks which generated $607,375 in cash flow to date since the date of our inception.

As of June 30, 2010, we had cash in the amount of $52,147, which will not be sufficient to sustain operations and conduct our planned exploration activities over the next twelve months. We have not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover our operating costs and allow us to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on us obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until we become profitable. If we are unable to obtain adequate capital, we could be forced to cease operations.

We will require significant additional cash to complete the proposed exploration programs on our various mining properties. Our business plan calls for ongoing expenses in connection with exploring and developing our mineral properties, including, but not limited to, an initial exploration budget of $60,000 for the Southern Beardmore claims and $132,500 CDN for Phase I of the exploration plan on the Vulture claims.  Accordingly, we must seek additional financing to fund our planned operations. Such additional funds may be raised through the issuance of equity, debt, convertible debt or similar securities that may have rights or preferences senior to those of our common stock. If financing adequate to fund our planned exploration activities cannot be secured, we will be required to limit our operations and the execution of our business plan will be significantly delayed.  There can be no assurance that such additional financing, when and if necessary, will be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all.

Research and Development

We will not be conducting any product research or development during the next 12 months.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As July 31, 2010, there were no off balance sheet arrangements.

Item 7A.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.
 

Item 8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 
32

 
graphic4
Tel: 604  688 5421
Fax: 604  688 5132
www.bdo.ca
BDO Canada LLP
600 Cathedral Place
925 West Georgia Street
Vancouver BC  V6C 3L2  Canada

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Shareholders
Source Gold Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Source Gold Corp. (the “Company”) (An Exploration Stage Company) and its subsidiaries as of July 31, 2010 and 2009 and the related statements of operations and comprehensive loss, cash flows and stockholders' equity for the years ended July 31, 2010 and 2009, and for the period from June 4, 2008 (Date of Inception) to July 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Source Gold Corp and its subsidiaries as of July 31, 2010 and 2009 and the results of its operations and their cash flows for the years ended July 31, 2010 and 2009, and for the period from June 4, 2008 (Date of Inception) to July 31, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements referred to above have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company is in the exploration stage, has working capital deficiency, has yet to achieve profitable operations, has accumulated losses since its inception and expects to incur further losses in the development of its business These factors, along with other matters as set forth in Note 1, raise substantial doubt that the Company will be able to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties
 
(signed) "BDO Canada LLP"
Chartered Accountants
 
   
Vancouver, Canada
 
November 15, 2010
 

SOURCE GOLD CORP.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
July31, 2010 and 2009
(Stated in US Dollars)

 
ASSETS
2010
 
2009
       
Current
     
Cash
$ 52,147   $ 8,014
Advances to operator – Note 6(c)
  26,968     -
           
  $ 79,115   $ 8,014
 
LIABILITIES          
           
Current
         
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
$ 81,053   $ 4,690
Promissory note payable – Note 7
  -     1,842
Due to related party – Note 4
  20,000     1,000
           
    101,053     7,532
           
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)          
           
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value 20,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding
         
Common stock, $0.001 par value – Note 5
         
180,000,000 shares authorized 45,159,265 (2009: 44,400,000) shares issued   45,159     44,400
Additional paid in capital
  5,512,216     67,975
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage
  (5,579,313)     (111,893)
           
    (21,938)     482
           
  $ 79,115   $ 8,014
 
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES
SOURCE GOLD CORP.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
for the years ended July 31, 2010 and 2009 and the period from
June 4, 2008 (Date of Inception) to July 31, 2010
(Stated in US Dollars)

 
Years Ended July 31
 
Cumulative
June 4,
2008
(Date of
Inception) to
July 31,
 
2010
 
2009
 
2010
           
Expenses
         
Accounting and audit fees
$ 47,426   $ 32,397   $ 80,611
Bank charges
  975     368     1,376
Foreign exchange loss
  2,802     14     6,082
Legal fees
  120,330     27,442     151,574
Management fees – Note 5
  5,004,569     12,000     5,017,569
Mineral property option and acquisition costs
  199,894     3,717     203,611
Mineral property exploration costs
  52,200     16,685     68,885
Office expenses
  16,833     2,400     19,433
Regulatory expenses
  -     4,000     4,000
Shareholder communications
  13,696     -     13,696
Transfer agent and filing fees
  2,265     3,781     6,046
Travel
  6,430     -     6,430
                 
Net loss and comprehensive loss for the period
$ (5,467,420)   $ (102,804)   $ (5,579,313)
                 
Basic and diluted loss per share
$ (0.12)   $ (0.00)      
                 
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
  44,836,640     44,400,000      

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES
SOURCE GOLD CORP.
 (An Exploration Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
for the years ended July 31, 2010 and 2009 and the period from
June 4, 2008 (Date of Inception) to July 31, 2010
(Stated in US Dollars)
 
 
Years Ended July 31
   
Cumulative
June 4, 2008
(Date of
Inception) to
July 31
 
2010
   
2009
   
2010
               
Cash Flows used in Operating Activities
             
Net loss for the period
$ (5,467,420 )   $ (102,804 )   $ (5,579,313)
Items not involving cash:
                   
Mineral property option costs
  -       1,842       1,842
Foreign exchange adjustment
  110       -       110
Mineral property and option acquisition
  20,000       -       20,000
Management fees
  4,950,000       -       4,950,000
Changes in non-cash working capital items:
                   
Prepaid expenses
  -       142       -
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
  76,286       (6,266 )     80,976
                     
Net cash used in operating activities
  (421,024 )     (107,086 )     (526,385)
                     
Cash Flows used in Investing Activity
                   
Exploration advances
  (26,968 )     -       (26,968)
                     
Net cash used in investing activity
  (26,968 )     -       (26,968)
                     
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
                   
Capital stock issued, net cash commission
  495,000       -       607,375
Promissory note paid
  (1,875 )     -       (1,875)
Repayment to related parties
  (1,000 )     (1,200 )     -
                     
Net cash provided by (used in) provided by financing activities
  492,125       (1,200 )     605,500
                     
Increase (decrease) in cash during the period
  44,133       (108,286 )     52,147
                     
Cash, beginning of the period
  8,014       116,300       -
                     
Cash, end of the period
$ 52,147     $ 8,014     $ 52,147
                     
Supplemental information
                   
Interest and taxes paid in cash
$ -     $ -     $ -
 
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES
SOURCE GOLD CORP.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
for the period from June 4, 2008 (Date of Inception) to July 31, 2010
(Stated in US Dollars)

 
Common Shares
 
Additional
Paid In
 
Deficit
Accumulated
During the
Exploration
     
 
Number
 
Par
 
Capital
 
Stage
   
Total
                     
Capital stock issued for cash:                          – at $0.002   24,000,000   $ 24,000   $ 24,000   $ -     $ 48,000
$ at 0.0035   20,400,000     20,400     51,000     -       71,400
Less: commission
  -     -     (7,025)     -       (7,025)
Net loss for the period
  -     -     -     (9,089 )     (9,089)
                               
Balance July 31, 2008
  44,400,000     44,400     67,975     (9,089 )     103,286
Net loss for the year
  -     -     -     (102,804 )     (102,804)
                               
Balance July 31, 2009
  44,400,000     44,400     67,975     (111,893 )     482
Capital stock issued for cash: 
 – at $0.25
  400,000     400     99,600     -       100,000
– at $1.00   220,000     220     219,780     -       220,000
– at $1.50   33,333     33     49,967     -       50,000
– at $1.18   105,932     106     124,894     -       125,000
Capital contribution by former president – Note 5
  -     -     4,950,000     -       4,950,000
Net loss for the year
  -     -     -     (5,467,420 )     (5,467,420)
                               
Balance July 31, 2010
  45,159,265   $ 45,159   $ 5,512,216   $ (5,579,313 )   $ (21,938)
 
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES
SOURCE GOLD CORP.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
July 31, 2010 and 2009
(Stated in US Dollars)

Note 1
Nature of Operations and Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The Company was incorporated in the state of Nevada, United States of America on June 4, 2008.  The Company is an exploration stage company and was formed for the purpose of acquiring exploration and development stage mineral properties.  The Company’s year-end is July 31. On August 31, 2009, the Company changed its name to Source Gold Corp. in order to reflect the current focus of the Corporation.

Effective September 10, 2009, the Company increased the number of authorized common shares of the Company from 90,000,000 to 180,000,000 shares and its authorized preferred shares from 10,000,000 to 20,000,000 shares per director’s resolution dated August 31, 2009.  The Company also conducted a four to one forward stock split of the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares per director’s resolution. Following this stock split, the number of outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock increased from 11,100,000 shares to 44,400,000 shares. All share and per share information in these financial statements has been retro-actively restated for all periods presented to give effect of this stock split.

During the prior year, the Company acquired via its subsidiary company IRC Exploration Ltd (“IRC”) a mineral claim located in British Columbia, Canada. During the year ended July 31, 2010, the mineral property option agreement for the claim in British Columbia was abandoned.

During the year ended July 31, 2010, the Company acquired two additional mineral properties located in Ontario, Canada.  The Company also incorporated two new subsidiary companies Northern Bonanza Inc, (“NBI”) to hold its mineral properties located in Ontario, Canada, and Source Bonanza LLC. (“SB”) to hold its mineral properties located in the USA.  During the current year the Company transferred its Ontario mineral properties to NBI.

The Company intends on exploring its mineral properties and has not yet determined the existence of economically recoverable reserves.  The recoverability of amounts incurred on its mineral properties is dependent upon the existence of economically recoverable reserves in the property, confirmation of the Company’s interest in the underlying mineral claims, the ability of the Company to obtain the necessary financing to complete their development, and the attainment and maintenance of future profitable production or disposition thereof.

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which assumes that the Company will be able to meet its obligations and continue its operations for its next fiscal year.  Realization values may be substantially different from carrying values as shown and these financial statements do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary to the carrying values and classification of assets and liabilities should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
 
Source Gold Corp.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
July 31, 2010 and 2009
(Stated in US Dollars)

Note 1
Nature of Operations and Ability to Continue as a Going Concern – (cont’d)
 
The Company has yet to achieve profitable operations, has accumulated losses of $5,579,313 since its inception, has working capital deficiency of $21,938, no source of recurring revenues and expects to incur further losses in the development of its business, all of which casts substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate future profitable operations and/or to obtain the necessary financing from shareholders or other sources to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due.

Management has no formal plan in place to address this concern but considers that the Company will be able to obtain additional funds by equity financing and/or related party advances, however there is no assurance of additional funding being available or on acceptable terms, if at all.
 
Note 2
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
 
The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and are stated in US dollars.  Because a precise determination of many assets and liabilities is dependent upon future events, the preparation of financial statements for a period necessarily involves the use of estimates, which have been made using careful judgment. Actual results may vary from these estimates.

Principles of Consolidation

 
These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary companies IRC Exploration Ltd., a company incorporated in British Columbia, Canada on August 1, 2008; Northern Bonanza Inc, a company incorporated in Ontario, Canada on June 30, 2010 and Source Bonanza LLC. a Limited Liability Company incorporated in Nevada, USA. on June 18, 2010.  All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Exploration Stage Company

The Company is an exploration stage company.  All losses accumulated since inception have been considered as part of the Company’s exploration stage activities.

Cash

 
Cash consists of all highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to cash within 90 days when purchased.
 
 
F-7

Source Gold Corp.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
July 31, 2010 and 2009
(Stated in US Dollars)
 
Note 2
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (cont’d)
 
Mineral Properties

Costs of lease, acquisition, exploration, carrying and retaining unproven mineral lease properties are expensed as incurred.

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company’s functional currency is the Canadian dollar as substantially all of the Company’s operations are in Canada. IRC’s and NBI’s functional currency is the Canadian dollar.  The functional currency of SB is the US dollar as its activities are in the USA. The Company uses the United States dollar as its reporting currency for consistency with registrants of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency are translated into US dollar reporting currency at the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date and capital accounts are translated at historical rates.  Income statement accounts are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing during the period.    Transactions undertaken in currencies other than the functional currency of the entity are translated using the exchange rate in effect as of the transaction date.  Any exchange gains and losses are included in the Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

Income Taxes

The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and loss carry-forwards and their respective tax bases.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a change in tax rules on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in operations in the year of change. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is “more likely-than-not” that a deferred tax asset will not be realized.

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

Basic loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted earnings per share are computed similar to basic income per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of common stock equivalents. Common stock equivalents represent the dilutive effect of the assumed exercise of any outstanding stock equivalents, using the treasury stock method, at either the beginning of the respective period presented or the date of issuance, whichever is later, and only if the common stock equivalents are considered dilutive based upon the Company’s net income (loss) position at the calculation date.  There are no common stock equivalents outstanding and, thus, diluted and basic loss per share are the same.

Source Gold Corp.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
July 31, 2010 and 2009
(Stated in US Dollars)
 
Note 2
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (cont’d)

Comprehensive Income

The Company is required to report comprehensive income, which includes net loss as well as changes in equity from non-owner sources.

Newly Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

  In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued authoritative guidance which established the FASB Standards Accounting Codification ("Codification") as the source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied to nongovernmental entities, and rules and interpretive releases of the SEC as authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.  The Codification supersedes all the existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards upon its effective date and, subsequently, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts.  The guidance is not intended to change or alter existing GAAP. The guidance became effective for the Company on September 15, 2009.  The guidance did not have an impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  All references to previous numbering of FASB Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts have been removed from the financial statements and accompanying footnotes.

In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for subsequent events. The guidance provides authoritative accounting literature related to evaluating subsequent events that was previously addressed only in the auditing literature. The guidance is similar to the current guidance with some exceptions that are not intended to result in significant change to current practice. The guidance defines subsequent events and also requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date. The Company has evaluated subsequent events up to the reporting date, November 12, 2010.  The Company adopted the disclosure provisions of the guidance as of August 1, 2009.  The adoption did not have an impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for non-controlling interests in consolidated financial statements which established new accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary.  Specifically, this requires the recognition of a non-controlling interest (minority interest) as equity in the consolidated financial statements and separate from the parent's equity.  The amount of net income attributable to the non-controlling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement.  The guidance clarifies that changes in a parent's ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial interest. In addition, this statement requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated.  Such gain or loss will be measured using the fair value of the non-controlling equity investment on the deconsolidation date.  The guidance also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the parent and its non-controlling interest.  The adoption of this guidance as at August 1, 2009 had no effect on the Company’s financial statements.
 
Source Gold Corp.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
July 31, 2010 and 2009
(Stated in US Dollars)
 
Note 2
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (cont’d)
 
Newly Adopted Accounting Pronouncements – (cont’d)

 
In June 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for determining whether an instrument (or an embedded feature) is indexed to an entity’s own stock.  This guidance provides that an entity should use a two step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions.  It also clarifies on the impact of foreign currency denominated strike prices and market-based employee stock option valuation instruments on the evaluation. The adoption of this guidance as at August 1, 2009 had no effect on the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

 
In December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which amended the existing guidance for business combinations.  The revised guidance establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree.  The guidance also provides direction for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. This guidance became effective for the Company on August 1, 2009.  The adoption of this revised guidance had no effect on the Company’s financial statements for the years ended July 31, 2010 and 2009.

Newly Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which amended the existing guidance for the consolidation of variable interest entities, to address the elimination of the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity. The guidance also replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity, and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity. Additionally, the guidance requires any enterprise that holds a variable interest in a variable interest entity to provide enhanced disclosures that will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprise's involvement in a variable interest entity. The guidance is effective for the Company commencing August 1, 2010.  The Company believes that the guidance will not have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2009 the FASB issued authoritative guidance which amended existing guidance for the accounting for transfers of financial assets.  The objective of this guidance is to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets.

Source Gold Corp.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
July 31, 2010 and 2009
(Stated in US Dollars)
 
Note 2
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (cont’d)
 
Newly Adopted Accounting Pronouncements – (cont’d)

 
This guidance is effective for the Company commencing August 1, 2010.  Earlier application is prohibited.  This guidance must be applied to transfers occurring on or after the effective date.  The Company is assessing the effect that the implementation of this guidance will have on the financial statements.

 
In June 2008, the FASB ratified authoritative guidance for determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities. The guidance addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment awards are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, must be included in the earnings allocation in calculating earnings per share under the two-class method. The guidance requires that unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend-equivalents be treated as participating securities in calculating earnings per share. The guidance is effective for the Company on August 1, 2010, and shall be applied retrospectively to all prior periods.  The Company believes that the guidance will not have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Note 3
Financial Instruments

 
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid upon transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and in the principal or most advantageous market for that asset or liability. The fair value should be calculated based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, not on assumptions specific to the entity. In addition, the fair value of liabilities should include consideration of non-performance risk including our own credit risk.

 
The fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs prioritizes the inputs into three levels based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market.  Each fair value measurement is reported in one of the three levels which is determined by the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. These levels are:

 
Level 1 – inputs are based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.

 
Level 2 – inputs are based upon significant observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Source Gold Corp.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
July 31, 2010 and 2009
(Stated in US Dollars)

Note 3
Financial Instruments – (cont’d)
 
 
Level 3 – inputs are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The fair values are therefore determined using model-based techniques that include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques.

The carrying value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities which consist of cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, promissory note payable, and due to related parties in management’s opinion approximate their fair value due to the short maturity of such instruments.  These financial assets and liabilities are valued using level 3 inputs, except for cash which is at level 1.  Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, exchange or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.

Note 4
Related Party Transactions

All related party transactions have been measured at the exchange value which was the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties

On June 16, 2008 the Company received and accepted a subscription to purchase 24,000,000 common shares at $0.002 per share for aggregate proceeds of $48,000 from Company’s former president.  The subscription agreement permitted the Company to accept US$48,000 or CDN$48,000 in full settlement of the share subscription.  The share subscription was settled in Canadian dollars.  On June 16, 2008 the shares were issued.

On July 1, 2008, the Company entered into a Corporate Management Services Agreement with the Company’s president at the time for management services.  Pursuant to the agreement the former President receives $1,000 per month plus expenses for services rendered.  The agreement was terminated effective November 1, 2009, and the former President resigned on November 6, 2009.

As at July 31, 2009, the amount due to related party was due to the Company’s former president for unpaid management fees of $1,000.  This amount was unsecured, non-interest bearing and had no specific terms for repayment.

On June 30, 2010, the Company purchased from the Company president 13 mineral property claims in the Thunder Bay mining division of Ontario, Canada.  As consideration for the purchase the Company issued an unsecured, non-interest bearing promissory note for $20,000 due on November 30, 2010.

During the year ended July 31, 2010, the Company incurred management fees of $3,000 (2009 - $12,000) charged by the Company’s former president and $51,569 (2009 - $Nil) charged by the Company’s president.
 
Source Gold Corp.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
July 31, 2010 and 2009
(Stated in US Dollars)
 
Note 4
Related Party Transactions – (cont’d)

On November 1, 2009, the Company entered into a Corporate Management Services Agreement with the newly appointed President of the Company for management services.  Pursuant to the agreement the President would receive a signing bonus of $7,500 (paid November 1, 2009) and $5,000 per month from December 1, 2009 for services rendered plus reimbursement of company’s expenses.  The agreement may be terminated by either party upon 30 days written notice.

Note 5             Capital Stock – Note 1

Issued:

 
On June 16, 2008, the Company issued 24,000,000 common shares to the Company’s former president at $0.002 per share for total proceeds of $48,000.

 
On July 31, 2008, the Company issued 20,400,000 common shares at $0.0035 per share for total proceeds of $71,400 pursuant to a private placement.  The Company paid commissions of $7,025 for net proceeds of $64,375.

 
On October 26, 2009, the Company issued 200,000 common shares at $0.25 per share for total proceeds of $50,000 pursuant to a private placement.

 
On October 30 2009, the Company issued 200,000 common shares at $0.25 per share for total proceeds of $50,000 pursuant to a private placement.

 
On November 26, 2009, the Company issued 100,000 common shares at $1.00 per share for total proceeds of $100,000 pursuant to a private placement.

 
On March 5, 2010, the Company issued 120,000 common shares at $1.00 per share for total proceeds of $120,000 pursuant to a private placement.

 
On April 30, 2010, the Company issued 33,333 common shares at $1.50 per share for total proceeds of $50,000 pursuant to a private placement.

 
On June 16, 2010, the Company issued 105,932 common shares at $1.18 per share for total proceeds of $125,000 pursuant to a private placement.

 
Capital Contribution

 
During the year ended July 31, 2010, the former president of the Company granted an option to the president of the Company to acquire up to 20,000,000 common shares of the Company,held by the former president, at a price of $0.0025 per share effective December 20, 2010 until May 1, 2011.  The Company has recorded compensation under management fees and a capital contribution of $4,950,000 using the Black-scholes valuation model based on the following inputs; exercise price $0.0025; dividend rate Nil; term 1 year; and volatility 100%.
 
Source Gold Corp.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
July 31, 2010 and 2009
(Stated in US Dollars)

Note 6
Mineral Properties – (cont’d)

 
a)
On August 11, 2008, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, IRC Exploration Ltd. (“IRC”), entered into a property option agreement whereby IRC was granted an option to earn up to an 85% interest in one mineral claim (the “Queen” claim) consisting of 457.7 hectares located in the Omineca Mining Division of British Columbia.  The option agreement is denominated in Canadian dollars.  Consideration for the option is cash payments totalling $52,167 (CDN$54,000) and aggregate exploration expenditures of $232,957 (CDN$241,000) as follows:

i)      Cash payments:

·  
$1,875 (CDN$2,000) upon execution of the Option agreement (paid);
·  
$1,842 (CDN$2,000) on or before July 31, 2009 (paid);
·  
$48,450 (CDN$50,000) on or before July 31. 2010.

 
ii)
Exploration expenditures of $14,157 (CDN$15,000) on or before July 31, 2009 (expenses incurred), $29,467 (CDN$31,000) in aggregate on or before July 31, 2010; $232,957 (CDN$241,000) in aggregate on or before July 31, 2011.

Upon earning its 85% interest in the option, the Company shall enter into a joint venture agreement to develop and operate the property.

The property option agreement was stated in Canadian dollars.  The US dollar equivalent is converted using the foreign exchange rate at July 31, 2010.

On July 31, 2010, the Company abandoned the claims.

 
b)
On October 26, 2009, the Company entered into a property option agreement whereby the Company was granted an option to earn up to a 50% interest in 19 mineral claims (the “KRK West” claims) located in the Thunder Bay Mining Division of Ontario.  The option agreement is denominated in Canadian dollars.  Consideration for the option is the issuance of 2,000,000 common shares of the Company, cash payments totalling $103,718 (CDN$110,000), and aggregate exploration expenditures of $969,268 (CDN$1,000,000) as follows:

i)  
Cash payments:

·  
$46,640 (CDN$50,000) upon execution of the Option agreement (paid);
· $57,078(CDN$60,000) on or before December 1, 2009 (paid)

 
ii)
Exploration expenditures of $484,768 (CDN$500,000) on or before December 31, 2010, and $969,268 (CDN$1,000,000) in aggregate on or before December 31, 2011.
 
Source Gold Corp.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
July 31, 2010 and 2009
(Stated in US Dollars)
 
Note 6
Mineral Properties – (cont’d)
 
b)      – (cont’d)

ii)      – (cont’d)

  During the year ended July 31, 2010, the Company incurred exploration expenditures aggregating $31,526 (CDN$32,258) (See below regarding status of the agreement)

iii) The issuance of 2,000,000 common shares (none issued) to the shareholders of the optionor, as directed by the optionor.

  Upon earning its 50% interest in the option, the Company shall enter into a joint venture agreement to develop and operate the property.

  Pursuant to the agreement, if commercial production has been achieved and the Company sells or otherwise disposes of metals and minerals that has been produced and removed from the KRK West properties, the Company will pay Thunder Bay a 3% Net Smelter Return royalty. In the event the Company sells or causes the sale of products other than to a smelter or refinery or otherwise causes the removal of products from the Property, the Company will pay a 2% Net Smelter Return Royalty. Alternatively, the Company can buy back the royalty right for $1,000,000 for each breccia pipe that reaches commercial production.

The property option agreement is stated in Canadian dollars.  The US dollar equivalent is converted using the foreign exchange rate at July 31, 2010 for all future commitments.

During the year ended July 31, 2010, the Company learned that the optionor had allowed the underlying claims to lapse, and therefore the option agreement was null and void.  The Company, and a director of the Company (The Company subsequently purchased these claims from the director), purchased the claims from persons who re-staked the claims for an aggregate amount of $27,915.  Subsequent to acquisition the claims they were transferred to the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Northern Bonanza Inc. .

The original optionor represents that control of the claims remains with the optionor and that the Company has no right to further explore the property.  The Company disagrees with this assertion and accordingly ownership to the claims is in dispute. On January 7, 2011 the Ministry of Northern Development, Mines and Forestry, Canada, will adjudicate upon the ownership of the claims.
 
Source Gold Corp.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
July 31, 2010 and 2009
(Stated in US Dollars)
 
Note 6
Mineral Properties – (cont’d)

 
c)
During the year ended July 31, 2010, the Company entered into a property purchase agreement, which was formalized on May 4, 2010, to acquire a 100% interest in 21 mining claims located in the Northern Ontario for $50,767 (Cdn$51,800).  During the year ended July 31, 2010, the Company incurred an additional $17,494 in staking costs in relation to these claims.  Subsequent to acquisition the claims and exploration costs were transferred to NBI at cost.

 
During the year ended July 31, 2010 the Company made exploration advances to the operator of $47,086.  As at July 31, 2010 the operator had incurred exploration expenses totalling $20,118 resulting in net advances having been made at July 31, 2009 of $26,968 (2009 - $nil).

Note 7
Promissory note payable

Pursuant to a promissory note dated July 31, 2009, the Company agreed to pay the owner of the “Queen” claim $1,842 (CND$2,000). The note was unsecured, non-interest bearing, and was due on or before January 31, 2010.  On November 6, 2009 the Company paid and settled the note in full.

Note 8
Income Taxes

 
A reconciliation of the income tax provision computed at statutory rates to the reported tax provision is as follows:

 
Year Ended
July 31,
2010
 
Year Ended
July 31,
2009
       
Basic statutory and provincial income tax rate
  34.0%     34.0%
           
Approximate loss before income taxes
$ 5,467,000   $ 103,000
           
Expected approximate tax recovery on net loss,
 before income tax
$ 1,859,000   $ 35,000
Permanent difference
  (1,682,000)     -
Changes in valuation allowance
  (177,000)     (35,000)
           
Deferred income tax recovery
$ -   $ -
 
Source Gold Corp.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
July 31, 2010 and 2009
(Stated in US Dollars)
 
Note 8
Income Taxes – (cont’d)

 
Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

 
Year Ended
July 31,
2010
 
Year Ended
July 31,
2009
       
Deferred income tax assets
     
Non-capital losses carried forward
$ 169,000   $ 30,000
Mineral properties
  43,000     5,000
Less: valuation allowance
  (212,000)     (35,000)
           
Deferred income tax assets
$ -   $ -

 
At July 31, 2010, the Company has incurred accumulated net operating losses in the United States of America totalling approximately $494,000 which are available to reduce taxable income in future taxation years.

These losses expire as follows:

Year of Expiry
Amount
   
2028
$ 9,000
2029
  82,000
2030
  406,000
     
  $ 497,000

 
The amount taken into income as deferred tax assets must reflect that portion of the income tax loss carryforwards that is more-likely-than-not to be realized from future operations.  The Company has chosen to provide an allowance of 100% against all available income tax loss carryforwards, regardless of their time of expiry.

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various state and foreign jurisdictions.  The Company’s tax returns are subject to tax examinations by U.S. federal and state tax authorities, or examinations by foreign tax authorities until respective statute of limitation.  It is subject to tax examinations by tax authorities for all taxation years commencing on or after 2008.

Note 8
Income Taxes – (cont’d)

Uncertain Tax Positions – (cont’d)

Provision has not been made for U.S. or additional foreign taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries. Such earnings have been and will continue to be reinvested but could become subject to additional tax if they were remitted as dividends, or were loaned to the Company affiliate. It is not practicable to determine the amount of additional tax, if any, that might be payable on the undistributed foreign earnings.

Note 9
Commitments

 
The Company has an ongoing agreement with a director of the company to provide management services for $5,000 per month.  Either party many terminate the agreement with one months written notice.

Note 10
Subsequent Event

On August 7, 2010, the Company acquired a 100% interest in Vulture Gold LLC, (“Vulture”) a Nevada limited Liability Company.  Vulture holds 27 mineral claims in Maricopa County, Arizona, known as the Vulture Mine.  As consideration for the acquisition the Company issued 4,000,000 common shares with a fair value of $2,000,000.
 
 
Item 9.   Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A(T).  Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we have carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, being July 31, 2010. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our company’s reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based upon that evaluation, our President and Chief Executive Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2010 based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As a result of this assessment, management concluded that, as of July 31, 2010, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective. Our management identified the following material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, which are indicative of many small companies with small staff: (i) inadequate segregation of duties and effective risk assessment; and (ii) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of both US GAAP and SEC guidelines.
 
We plan to take steps to enhance and improve the design of our internal control over financial reporting. During the period covered by this annual report on Form 10-K, we have not been able to remediate the material weaknesses identified above. To remediate such weaknesses, we hope to implement the following changes during our fiscal year ending July 31, 2011: (i) appoint additional qualified personnel to address inadequate segregation of duties and ineffective risk management; and (ii) adopt sufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting. The remediation efforts set out in (i) is largely dependent upon our securing additional financing to cover the costs of implementing the changes required. If we are unsuccessful in securing such funds, remediation efforts may be adversely affected in a material manner.
 
This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to an exemption for non-accelerated filers set forth in Section 989G  of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
 
Remediation of Material Weakness

We are unable to remedy our internal controls until we receive financing to hire additional employees.  

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting are or will be capable of preventing or detecting all errors or all fraud. Any control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements, due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns may occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk.

Item 9B.   Other Information

None.
 

PART III

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The following information sets forth the names of our current director and executive officer, her age as of July 31, 2010 and her present positions.

Name
Age
Position(s) and Office(s) Held
Lauren Notar
50
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Director

Set forth below is a brief description of the background and business experience of each of our current executive officers and directors.

Lauren Notar.    Ms. Notar is our CEO, CFO, President, and sole director.  She has served in these capacities since November 2009. During 2009, Ms. Notar also operated her own independent sales and marketing company. From 2008 to 2009, she was with Dolphin Enterprises in the sales department.  From 2007-2008, she worked with investor relations at Ryland Oil and Gas.  From 2005 to 2007 she was an investment advisor at Global Securities Corporation.  From 2002 to 2005, she was an investment advisor with Canaccord Capital Corporation.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between or among the directors, executive officers or persons nominated or chosen by us to become directors or executive officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To  the best of our knowledge, during the past ten years, none of the following  occurred  with  respect  to a present or former director, executive officer, or  employee: (1) any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business  of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at  the  time  of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; (2) any conviction in a criminal  proceeding  or  being subject to a pending criminal proceeding  (excluding  traffic  violations and other minor offenses); (3) being subject  to  any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or  vacated,  of  any  court  of  competent  jurisdiction,  permanently  or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his or her involvement in  any  type of business, securities or banking activities; and (4) being found by  a  court  of  competent  jurisdiction  (in  a  civil action), the SEC or the Commodities  Futures  Trading  Commission  to  have  violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated.
 

Audit Committee

We do not have a separately-designated standing audit committee.  The entire board of directors performs the functions of an audit committee, but no written charter governs the actions of the board of directors when performing the functions of that would generally be performed by an audit committee. The board of directors approves the selection of our independent accountants and meets and interacts with the independent accountants to discuss issues related to financial reporting. In addition, the board of directors reviews the scope and results of the audit with the independent accountants, reviews with management and the independent accountants our annual operating results, considers the adequacy of our internal accounting procedures and considers other auditing and accounting matters including fees to be paid to the independent auditor and the performance of the independent auditor.

We do not have an audit committee financial expert because of the size of our company and our board of directors at this time.  We believe that we do not require an audit committee financial expert at this time because we retain outside consultants who possess these attributes.

For the fiscal year ending July 31, 2010, the board of directors:

1.  
Reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management, and

2.  
Reviewed and discussed the written disclosures and the letter from our independent auditors on the matters relating to the auditor's independence.

Based upon the board of directors’ review and discussion of the matters above, the board of directors authorized inclusion of the audited financial statements for the year ended July 31, 2008 to be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Code of Ethics

As of July 31, 2010, we had not adopted a Code of Ethics for Financial Executives, which would include our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions.
 

Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Our officers and directors are indemnified as provided by the Nevada Revised Statutes and our bylaws.

Under the governing Nevada statutes, director immunity from liability to a company or its shareholders for monetary liabilities applies automatically unless it is specifically limited by a company's articles of incorporation.  Our articles of incorporation do not contain any limiting language regarding director immunity from liability.  Excepted from this immunity are:

1.  
a willful failure to deal fairly with the company or its shareholders in connection with a matter in which the director has a material conflict of interest;

2.  
a violation of criminal law (unless the director had reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was lawful or no reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful);

3.  
a transaction from which the director derived an improper personal profit; and
 
4.  
willful misconduct.

Our bylaws provide that we will indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent not prohibited by Nevada law; provided, however, that we may modify the extent of such indemnification by individual contracts with our directors and officers; and, provided, further, that we shall not be required to indemnify any director or officer in connection with any proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such person unless:

1.  
such indemnification is expressly required to be made by law;

2.  
the proceeding was authorized by our Board of Directors;

3.  
such indemnification is provided by us, in our sole discretion, pursuant to the powers  vested in us under Nevada law; or;

4.  
such indemnification is required to be made pursuant to the bylaws.

Our bylaws provide that we will advance to any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that he is or was a director or officer, of the company, or is or was serving at the request of the company as a director or executive officer of another company, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, prior to the final disposition of the proceeding, promptly following request therefore, all expenses incurred by any director or officer in connection with such proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of such person to repay said amounts if it should be determined ultimately that such person is not entitled to be indemnified under our bylaws or otherwise.

Our bylaws provide that no advance shall be made by us to an officer of the company, except by reason of the fact that such officer is or was a director of the company in which event this paragraph shall not apply, in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, if a determination is reasonably and promptly made: (a) by the board of directors by a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the proceeding, or (b) if such quorum is not obtainable, or, even if obtainable, a quorum of disinterested directors so directs, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion, that the facts known to the decision-making party at the time such determination is made demonstrate clearly and convincingly that such person acted in bad faith or in a manner that such person did not believe to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the company.
 

Item 11.  Executive Compensation

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Compensation of our sole officer and director, Lauren Notar, is governed by a Corporate Management Services Agreement dated November 1, 2009.  Under this agreement, Ms Notar provides us with accounting, administrative, management, and corporate record-keeping services.  Ms. Notar received a $7,500 signing bonus per the agreement, and is paid a monthly stipend of $5,000 together with reimbursement of any company expenses incurred. The agreement may be terminated by either party upon 30 days written notice.

The goal of our current compensation arrangement is to provide our sole officer with such compensation for her time and efforts as is feasible and appropriate for a small, exploration stage mineral resource company.  In addition, Ms. Notar holds an option to acquire substantial ownership of our common stock and we believe she is therefore additionally motivated by a strong entrepreneurial interest in developing our operations and potential revenue base to the best of her ability.   As our business and operations expand and mature, we may expand our compensation package designed to attract, retain and motivate talented executives.

Summary Compensation Table

The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to both to our officers and to our directors for all services rendered in all capacities to us for our fiscal years ended July 31, 2010 and 2009.
 
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and
principal position
Year
Management fee
 ($)
Bonus
($)
 
Stock
Awards
($)
Option
Awards
($)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
All Other
Compensation
($)
Total
($)
 
Lauren Notar, CEO, CFO, President, Secretary-Treasure
 
Harry
Bygdnes,
Former CEO, CFO, President, Secretary-Treasurer
 
2010
2009
 
 
 
 
2010
2009
 
 
51,569
n/a
 
 
 
3,000
12,000
 
0
n/a
 
 
 
0
n/a
0
n/a
 
 
 
0
n/a
0
n/a
 
 
 
0
n/a
0
n/a
 
 
 
0
n/a
0
n/a
 
 
 
0
n/a
0
n/a
 
 
 
0
n/a
 
51,569
n/a
 
 
 
3,000
12,000
 

Narrative Disclosure to the Summary Compensation Table

Pursuant to the agreement discussed above, our current sole officer and director, Lauren Notar, received a total of $51,569 during the year ended July 31, 2010.  Our former President, Harry Bygdnes, received total management fees of $3,000 pursuant to his former management services agreement, which provided him with compensation of $1,000 per month plus reimbursement of expenses.
 

Stock Option Grants

We have not granted any stock options to the executive officers or directors since our inception.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The table below summarizes all unexercised options, stock that has not vested, and equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer as of July 31, 2010.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
OPTION AWARDS
STOCK AWARDS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Name
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
 (#)
Unexercisable
 
 
 
 
 
Equity
Incentive
 Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Option
Exercise
 Price
 ($)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Option
Expiration
Date
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number
of
Shares
or Units
of
Stock That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
 
 
 
Market
Value
of
Shares
or
Units
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
 
Equity
Incentive
 Plan
Awards:
 Number
of
Unearned
 Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
 Not
Vested
(#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
 Vested
(#)
Lauren Notar, CEO, CFO, President, Secretary-Treasure
 
Harry Bygdnes,
CEO, CFO, President, Secretary-Treasurer
-
 
 
 
 
-
-
 
 
 
 
-
-
 
 
 
 
-
-
 
 
 
 
-
-
 
 
 
 
-
-
 
 
 
 
-
-
 
 
 
 
-
-
 
 
 
 
-
-
 
 
 
 
-

Compensation of Directors

We do not compensate our directors for their service at this time.

Stock Option Plans

We did not have a stock option plan in place as of July 31, 2010.
 

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth, as of October 18, 2010 certain information as to shares of our common stock owned by (i) each person known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, (ii) each of our officers and directors, and (iii) all of our executive officers and directors as a group:
 
Title of class
Name and address of beneficial owner (1)
Amount of
beneficial ownership
Percent
of class(2)
 
Executive Officers & Directors:
Common
Lauren Notar
2 Toronto Street, Suite 234
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5C 2B5
20,000,000(3)
40.68%
 
Total of All Directors and Executive Officers (one person):
20,000 Shares
40.68%
 
Other More Than 5% Beneficial Owners:
Common
Harry Bygdnes
2 Toronto Street, Suite 234
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5C 2B5
24,000,000(4)
48.82%

(1)  
As used in this table, "beneficial ownership" means the sole or shared power to vote, or to direct the voting of, a security, or the sole or shared investment power with respect to a security (i.e., the power to dispose of, or to direct the disposition of, a security). In addition, for purposes of this table, a person is deemed, as of any date, to have "beneficial ownership" of any security that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days after such date.
(2)  
The percent of class is based on 49,159,265 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of October 18, 2010.

(3)  
Lauren Notar, is party to a Purchase Option Agreement dated November 6, 2009 (the “Agreement”).   Under the Agreement, Ms. Notar acquired the option to purchase up to 20,000,000 shares of our common stock from our former President and CEO, Harry Bygdnes, for a price of $0.0025 per share.  Under the Agreement, Ms. Notar’s options to purchase common stock from Mr. Bygdnes will first become exercisable on December 20, 2010 and will remain exercisable through May 1, 2011.  Aside from the agreed exercise price for any options which will be exercised, there was no separate consideration paid under the Agreement.  

(4)  
As all of Lauren Notar’s shares, if purchased pursuant to the existing option agreement, will be purchased from Harry Bygdnes, the greatest combined number of shares beneficially owned by Ms. Notar and Mr. Bygdnes is the current total of Mr. Bygdnes shares which is 24,000,000 shares or 48.82%.

 
Item 13.   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Except as provided below, none of our directors or executive officers, nor any proposed nominee for election as a director, nor any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to all of our outstanding shares, nor any members of the immediate family (including spouse, parents, children, siblings, and in-laws) of any of the foregoing persons has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction over the last two years or in any presently proposed transaction which, in either case, has or will materially affect us.

On July 1, 2008, we entered into a Corporate Management Services Agreement with our Harry Bygdnes, our then and now former, President for Management Services.  Pursuant to the agreement he received $1,000 per month plus expenses for services rendered.  The agreement was terminated effective November 1, 2009.

On November 1, 2009, we entered into a Corporate Management Services Agreement with Lauren Notar, our newly appointed President, for management services.  Pursuant to the agreement the President she received a signing bonus of $7,500 (paid November 1, 2009) and $5,000 per month from December 1, 2009 plus expenses for services rendered.  The agreement may be terminated by either party upon 30 days written notice.

On June 30, 2010, we purchased from Lauren Notar, our President, 13 mineral property claims in the Thunder Bay mining division of Ontario, Canada.  As consideration for the purchase the Company issued an unsecured non-interest bearing promissory note for $20,000 which falls due on November 30, 2010.

As of the date of this annual report, our common stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board (the “Bulletin Board”).  The Bulletin Board does not impose on us standards relating to director independence or the makeup of committees with independent directors, or provide definitions of independence.

Item 14.   Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Below is the table of Audit Fees (amounts in US$) billed by our auditor in connection with the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the years ended:

Financial Statements for the
Year Ended July 31
Audit Services
Audit Related Fees
Tax Fees
Other Fees
2010
$15,000
$0
$0
$0
2009
$12,950
$0
$0
$0
 
 
PART IV

Item 15.   Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules

(a)
Financial Statements and Schedules
 
The following financial statements and schedules listed below are included in this Form 10-K.
 
Financial Statements (See Item 8)
 
(b)
Exhibits

Exhibit Number
Description
3.1
Articles of Incorporation, as amended (1)
3.2
Bylaws, as amended (1)
10.1
Purchase Agreement re Southern Beardmore Claims (2)
10.2
Mineral Property Option Agreement with Thunder Bay Minerals, Inc. (2)
10.3
Minerals Claims Purchase Agreement with Lauren Notar (2)
10.4
Purchase Agreement re Vulture Claims (2)
10.5
Corporate  Management Services Agreement with Lauren Notar (2)

(1)  
Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 7, 2008.
(2)  
Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2010.


SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SOURCE GOLD CORP.
 
 

By: /s/ Lauren Notar
Lauren Notar
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
February 15, 2011

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
 
By: /s/ Lauren Notar
Lauren Notar
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
February 15, 2011