Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - IASIS Healthcare LLC | c12194exv31w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - IASIS Healthcare LLC | c12194exv31w2.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 333-117362
IASIS HEALTHCARE LLC
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE | 20-1150104 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) | |
DOVER CENTRE | ||
117 SEABOARD LANE, BUILDING E | ||
FRANKLIN, TENNESSEE | 37067 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(615) 844-2747
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES o NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). YES o NO þ
As
of February 14, 2011, 100% of the registrants common interests outstanding (all of which
are privately owned and are not traded on any public market) were owned by IASIS Healthcare
Corporation, its sole member.
Table of Contents
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
IASIS HEALTHCARE LLC
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands)
December 31, | September 30, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 129,246 | $ | 144,511 | ||||
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of
$133,467 and $125,406 at December 31, 2010 and September 30,
2010, respectively |
236,094 | 209,173 | ||||||
Inventories |
59,081 | 53,842 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
24,854 | 15,881 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
71,821 | 65,340 | ||||||
Total current assets |
521,096 | 488,747 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
997,767 | 985,291 | ||||||
Goodwill |
798,394 | 718,243 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net |
33,434 | 27,000 | ||||||
Deposit for acquisition |
| 97,891 | ||||||
Other assets, net |
35,691 | 36,022 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,386,382 | $ | 2,353,194 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 77,989 | $ | 78,931 | ||||
Salaries and benefits payable |
35,580 | 38,110 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable |
2,108 | 12,536 | ||||||
Medical claims payable |
116,457 | 111,373 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
100,261 | 106,614 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
7,693 | 6,691 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
340,088 | 354,255 | ||||||
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
1,049,660 | 1,044,887 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
108,566 | 109,272 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
64,317 | 60,162 | ||||||
Non-controlling interests with redemption rights |
88,433 | 72,112 | ||||||
Equity: |
||||||||
Members equity |
725,056 | 702,135 | ||||||
Non-controlling interests |
10,262 | 10,371 | ||||||
Total equity |
735,318 | 712,506 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 2,386,382 | $ | 2,353,194 | ||||
See accompanying notes.
1
Table of Contents
IASIS HEALTHCARE LLC
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
(In Thousands)
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net revenue: |
||||||||
Acute care revenue |
$ | 471,139 | $ | 424,660 | ||||
Premium revenue |
202,192 | 204,297 | ||||||
Total net revenue |
673,331 | 628,957 | ||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||
Salaries and benefits (includes stock compensation of $496 and $121, respectively) |
189,913 | 170,482 | ||||||
Supplies |
76,436 | 65,409 | ||||||
Medical claims |
171,334 | 178,567 | ||||||
Other operating expenses |
97,126 | 84,592 | ||||||
Provision for bad debts |
59,614 | 47,949 | ||||||
Rentals and leases |
11,166 | 10,275 | ||||||
Interest expense, net |
16,877 | 16,732 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
24,046 | 23,877 | ||||||
Management fees |
1,250 | 1,250 | ||||||
Total costs and expenses |
647,762 | 599,133 | ||||||
Earnings from continuing operations before gain on disposal of assets and income
taxes |
25,569 | 29,824 | ||||||
Gain on disposal of assets, net |
345 | 104 | ||||||
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes |
25,914 | 29,928 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
9,189 | 10,591 | ||||||
Net earnings from continuing operations |
16,725 | 19,337 | ||||||
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
(3,208 | ) | 46 | |||||
Net earnings |
13,517 | 19,383 | ||||||
Net earnings attributable to non-controlling interests |
(1,771 | ) | (2,028 | ) | ||||
Net earnings attributable to IASIS Healthcare LLC |
$ | 11,746 | $ | 17,355 | ||||
See accompanying notes.
2
Table of Contents
IASIS HEALTHCARE LLC
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
(In Thousands)
Non-controlling | |||||||||||||||||
Interests with | Non- | ||||||||||||||||
Redemption | Members | controlling | |||||||||||||||
Rights | Equity | Interests | Total Equity | ||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
$ | 72,112 | $ | 702,135 | $ | 10,371 | $ | 712,506 | |||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
1,847 | 11,746 | (76 | ) | 11,670 | ||||||||||||
Distributions to non-controlling interests |
(3,056 | ) | | (33 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||||||||
Acquisition of Brim Holdings, Inc. |
24,986 | | | | |||||||||||||
Stock compensation |
| 496 | | 496 | |||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
| 983 | | 983 | |||||||||||||
Contribution from parent company related
to tax benefit from Holdings Senior PIK
Loans interest |
| 2,240 | | 2,240 | |||||||||||||
Adjustment to redemption value of
non-controlling interests with redemption
rights |
(7,456 | ) | 7,456 | | 7,456 | ||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
$ | 88,433 | $ | 725,056 | $ | 10,262 | $ | 735,318 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes.
3
Table of Contents
IASIS HEALTHCARE LLC
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(In Thousands)
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 13,517 | $ | 19,383 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Loss (earnings) from discontinued operations |
3,208 | (46 | ) | |||||
Depreciation and amortization |
24,046 | 23,877 | ||||||
Amortization of loan costs |
810 | 775 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
2,539 | 2,652 | ||||||
Income tax benefit from parent company interest |
2,240 | 2,224 | ||||||
Gain on disposal of assets, net |
(345 | ) | (104 | ) | ||||
Stock compensation |
496 | 121 | ||||||
Changes in
operating assets and liabilities, net of the effect of acquisitions
and dispositions: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
(8,334 | ) | (4,332 | ) | ||||
Inventories, prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(5,956 | ) | 4,486 | |||||
Accounts payable, other accrued expenses and other accrued liabilities |
(25,499 | ) | (39,373 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities continuing operations |
6,722 | 9,663 | ||||||
Net cash used in operating activities discontinued operations |
(240 | ) | (125 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
6,482 | 9,538 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment, net |
(15,360 | ) | (12,282 | ) | ||||
Payment for acquisitions |
(1,880 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from sale of assets |
| 31 | ||||||
Change in other assets, net |
515 | 659 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(16,725 | ) | (11,592 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||
Payment of debt and capital lease obligations |
(1,933 | ) | (3,452 | ) | ||||
Distributions to non-controlling interests, |
(3,089 | ) | (3,934 | ) | ||||
Costs paid
for the repurchase of partnership interests, net |
| (13 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(5,022 | ) | (7,399 | ) | ||||
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
(15,265 | ) | (9,453 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
144,511 | 206,528 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 129,246 | $ | 197,075 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 26,514 | $ | 26,393 | ||||
Cash paid for income taxes, net |
$ | 5 | $ | 4,000 | ||||
Supplemental
disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities |
||||||||
Capital lease obligations resulting from acquisition |
$ | 7,708 | $ | | ||||
See accompanying notes.
4
Table of Contents
IASIS HEALTHCARE LLC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the quarters ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009, reflect the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of
IASIS Healthcare LLC (IASIS or the Company). The Companys sole member and parent company is
IASIS Healthcare Corporation (Holdings or IAS).
IASIS owns and operates medium-sized acute care hospitals in high-growth urban and suburban
markets. At December 31, 2010, the Company owned or leased 17 acute care hospital facilities and
one behavioral health hospital facility, with a total of 3,570 licensed beds, located in seven
regions:
| Salt Lake City, Utah; |
| Phoenix, Arizona; |
| Tampa-St. Petersburg, Florida; |
| four cities in Texas, including San Antonio; |
| Las Vegas, Nevada; |
| West Monroe, Louisiana; and |
| Woodland Park, Colorado. |
The Company also owns and operates Health Choice Arizona, Inc. (Health Choice or the
Plan), a Medicaid and Medicare managed health plan in Phoenix, Arizona.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial reporting and in
accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The condensed
consolidated balance sheet of the Company at September 30, 2010, has been derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and
notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements contain all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring items) necessary for a
fair presentation of results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for any
interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.
Principles of Consolidation
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all subsidiaries and
entities under common control of the Company. Control is generally defined by the Company as
ownership of a majority of the voting interest of an entity. In addition, control is demonstrated
in most instances when the Company is the sole general partner in a limited partnership.
Significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the accompanying unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements and notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
These reclassifications have no impact on the Companys total assets or total liabilities and
equity.
5
Table of Contents
IASIS HEALTHCARE LLC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
General and Administrative
The majority of the Companys expenses are cost of revenue items. Costs that could be
classified as general and administrative by the Company would include the IASIS corporate office
costs, which were $10.0 million and $9.0 million for the quarters ended December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Subsequent Events Consideration
The Company has evaluated its financial statements and disclosures for the impact of
subsequent events up to the date of filing its quarterly report on Form 10-Q with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
2. LONG-TERM DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31, | September 30, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
Senior secured credit facilities |
$ | 568,788 | $ | 570,260 | ||||
Senior subordinated notes |
475,000 | 475,000 | ||||||
Capital leases and other obligations |
13,565 | 6,318 | ||||||
1,057,353 | 1,051,578 | |||||||
Less current maturities |
7,693 | 6,691 | ||||||
$ | 1,049,660 | $ | 1,044,887 | |||||
Senior Secured Credit Facilities
The $854.0 million senior secured credit facilities include: (i) a senior secured term loan of
$439.0 million; (ii) a senior secured delayed draw term loan of $150.0 million; (iii) a senior
secured revolving credit facility of $225.0 million, which includes a $100.0 million sub-limit for
letters of credit; and (iv) a senior secured synthetic letter of credit facility of $40.0 million.
All facilities mature on March 15, 2014, except for the revolving credit facility, which matures on
April 27, 2013. The term loans bear interest at an annual rate of LIBOR plus 2.00% or, at the
Companys option, the administrative agents base rate plus 1.00%. The revolving loans bear
interest at an annual rate of LIBOR plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.25% to 1.75% or, at
the Companys option, the administrative agents base rate plus an applicable margin ranging from
0.25% to 0.75%, such rate in each case depending on the Companys senior secured leverage ratio. A
commitment fee ranging from 0.375% to 0.50% per annum is charged on the undrawn portion of the
senior secured revolving credit facility and is payable in arrears.
Principal under the senior secured term loan is due in 24 consecutive equal quarterly
installments in an aggregate annual amount equal to 1.0% of the original principal amount ($439.0
million) during the first six years thereof, with the balance payable in four equal installments in
year seven. Principal under the senior secured delayed draw term loan is due in equal quarterly
installments in an aggregate annual amount equal to 1.0% of the original principal amount ($150.0
million) until March 31, 2013, with the balance payable in four equal installments during the final
year of the loan. The senior secured credit facilities are also subject to mandatory prepayment
under specific circumstances, including a portion of excess cash flow, a portion of the net
proceeds from an initial public offering, asset sales, debt issuances and specified casualty
events, each subject to various exceptions.
The senior secured credit facilities are (i) secured by a first mortgage and lien on the real
property and related personal and intellectual property of the Company and pledges of equity
interests in the entities that own such properties and (ii) guaranteed by certain of the Companys
subsidiaries. In addition, the senior secured credit facilities contain certain covenants which,
among other things, limit the incurrence of additional indebtedness, investments, dividends,
transactions with affiliates, asset sales, acquisitions, mergers and consolidations, liens and
encumbrances and other matters customarily restricted in such agreements.
6
Table of Contents
IASIS HEALTHCARE LLC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
At December 31, 2010, amounts outstanding under the Companys senior secured credit facilities
consisted of a $422.5 million term loan and a $146.3 million delayed draw term loan. In addition,
the Company had $39.9 million
and $41.7 million in letters of credit outstanding under the synthetic letter of credit
facility and the revolving credit facility, respectively. The weighted average interest rate for
outstanding borrowings under the senior secured credit facilities was 3.4% for the
quarters ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
8 3/4% Senior Subordinated Notes
The Company, together with its wholly-owned subsidiary, IASIS Capital Corporation, a holding
company with no assets or operations, as issuers, have outstanding $475.0 million aggregate
principal amount of 8 3/4% senior subordinated notes due 2014 (the 8
3/4% notes). The 8 3/4% notes are general unsecured
senior subordinated obligations and are subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future
senior debt of the Company. The Companys existing domestic subsidiaries, other than certain
non-guarantor subsidiaries, which include Health Choice and the Companys non-wholly owned
subsidiaries, are guarantors of the 8 3/4% notes. The 8
3/4% notes are effectively subordinated to all of the issuers and the
guarantors secured debt to the extent of the value of the assets securing the debt and are
structurally subordinated to all liabilities and commitments (including trade payables and capital
lease obligations) of the Companys subsidiaries that are not guarantors of the 8
3/4% notes.
Holdings Senior Paid-in-Kind Loans
IAS has outstanding unsecured Senior Paid-in-Kind (PIK) Loans, which were used to repurchase
certain preferred equity from its stockholders in fiscal 2007. The Holdings Senior PIK Loans mature
June 15, 2014, and bear interest at an annual rate equal to LIBOR plus 5.25%. At December 31, 2010,
the outstanding balance of the Holdings Senior PIK Loans was $395.4 million, which includes $95.4
million of interest that has accrued to the principal of these loans since the date of issuance. In
June 2012, the Holdings Senior PIK Loans, which rank behind the Companys existing debt, will
convert to cash-pay, at which time all accrued interest becomes
payable. In the event the Holdings Senior
PIK Loans are not refinanced before their maturity, it is anticipated
that principal and interest
will be funded by the cash flows of the Company.
3. INTEREST RATE SWAPS
Effective March 2, 2009, the Company executed interest rate swap transactions with Citibank,
N.A. and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as counterparties, with notional amounts totaling $425.0 million. The
arrangements with each counterparty include two interest rate swap agreements, one with a notional
amount of $112.5 million maturing on February 28, 2011 and one with a notional amount of $100.0
million maturing on February 29, 2012. The Company entered into these interest rate swap
arrangements to mitigate the floating interest rate risk on a portion of its outstanding variable
rate debt. Under these agreements, the Company is required to make monthly fixed rate payments to
the counterparties, as calculated on the applicable notional amounts, at annual fixed rates, which
range from 1.5% to 2.0% depending upon the agreement. The counterparties are obligated to make
monthly floating rate payments to the Company based on the one-month LIBOR rate for the same
referenced notional amount.
Total Notional | ||||
Date Range | Amounts | |||
(in thousands) | ||||
Expiring on February 28, 2011 |
$ | 225,000 | ||
Expiring on February 29, 2012 |
$ | 200,000 |
The Company accounts for its interest rate swaps in accordance with the provisions of FASB
authoritative guidance regarding accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities,
which also includes enhanced disclosure requirements. In accordance with these provisions, the
Company has designated its interest rate swaps as cash flow hedge instruments. The Company assesses
the effectiveness of these cash flow hedges on a quarterly basis, with any ineffectiveness being
measured using the hypothetical derivative method. The Company completed an assessment of its cash
flow hedge instruments during the quarters ended December 31,
2010 and 2009, and determined its hedging
instruments to be highly effective in both periods. Accordingly, no gain or loss resulting from hedging
ineffectiveness is reflected in the Companys accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated
statements of operations.
7
Table of Contents
IASIS HEALTHCARE LLC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The Company applies the provisions of FASB authoritative guidance regarding fair value
measurements, which provides a single definition of fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value, and expands disclosures concerning fair value measurements. The Company
applies these provisions to the valuation and disclosure of its interest rates swaps. This
authoritative guidance establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the
inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: (i) Level 1, which is defined as
quoted prices in active markets that can be accessed at the measurement date; (ii) Level 2, which
is defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are observable, either
directly or indirectly; and (iii) Level 3, which is defined as unobservable inputs resulting from
the existence of little or no market data, therefore potentially requiring an entity to develop its
own assumptions.
The Company determines the fair value of its interest rate swaps in a manner consistent with
that used by market participants in pricing hedging instruments, which includes using a discounted
cash flow analysis based upon the terms of the agreements, the impact of the one-month forward
LIBOR curve and an evaluation of credit risk. Given the use of observable market assumptions and
the consideration of credit risk, the Company has categorized the valuation of its interest rate
swaps as Level 2.
The fair value of the Companys interest rate swaps at December 31, 2010 and September 30,
2010, reflect liability balances of $4.1 million and $5.7 million, respectively, and are included
in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The fair value of the Companys interest rate swaps reflects a liability because the effect of the
forward LIBOR curve on future interest payments results in less interest due to the Company under
the variable rate component included in the interest rate swap agreements, as compared to the
amount due the Companys counterparties under the fixed interest rate component. Any change in the
fair value of the Companys interest rate swaps, net of income taxes, is included in other
comprehensive loss as a component of members equity in the accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated balance sheets.
4. ACQUISITIONS
Effective
October 1, 2010, the Company acquired Brim Holdings, Inc. (Brim) in a
cash-for-stock transaction valued at $95.0 million, subject to changes in net working capital. Brim
operates Wadley Regional Medical Center, a 370-licensed bed acute care hospital facility located in
Texarkana, Texas, and Pikes Peak Regional Hospital, a 15-licensed bed critical access acute care
hospital facility, in Woodland Park, Colorado, through operating lease agreements with separate
parties. The Brim acquisition was accounted for as a business combination, which requires the Company
to allocate the purchase price of these facilities to assets acquired or liabilities assumed based
on their fair values. The excess of the purchase price allocation over those fair values is
recorded as goodwill. The Company is currently working with third-party experts to
finalize the valuation of acquired assets; therefore, the fair values as recorded in the
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet have been estimated based upon the most
accurate information available, and are subject to adjustment upon
completion of the valuation.
5. GOODWILL
The following table presents the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill (in thousands):
Acute | Health | |||||||||||
Care | Choice | Total | ||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
$ | 712,486 | $ | 5,757 | $ | 718,243 | ||||||
Brim acquisition |
78,183 | | 78,183 | |||||||||
Other acquisitions |
1,968 | | 1,968 | |||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
$ | 792,637 | $ | 5,757 | $ | 798,394 | ||||||
For the quarter ended December 31, 2010, goodwill increased by $80.2 million as a result of
the purchase of Brim and other entities. The allocation of goodwill is subject to change as
the Company finalizes its valuation related to the Brim transaction.
See Note 4 for more details regarding
the fair value assessment of acquired assets and liabilities.
8
Table of Contents
IASIS HEALTHCARE LLC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
6. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income consists of two components: net earnings and other comprehensive income.
Other comprehensive income refers to revenues, expenses, gains and losses that under the FASB
authoritative guidance related to accounting for comprehensive income
are recorded as elements of
equity, but are excluded from net earnings. The following table presents the components of
comprehensive income, net of income taxes (in thousands):
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 13,517 | $ | 19,383 | ||||
Change in fair value of interest rate swaps |
1,560 | 289 | ||||||
Change in income tax expense |
(577 | ) | (109 | ) | ||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 14,500 | $ | 19,563 | ||||
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of income taxes, are as follows
(in thousands):
December 31, | September 30, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
Fair value of interest rate swaps |
$ | (4,147 | ) | $ | (5,707 | ) | ||
Income tax benefit |
1,551 | 2,128 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
$ | (2,596 | ) | $ | (3,579 | ) | ||
7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Net Revenue
The calculation of appropriate payments from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, including
supplemental Medicaid reimbursement, as well as terms governing agreements with other third-party
payors are complex and subject to interpretation. Final determination of amounts earned under the
Medicare and Medicaid programs often occurs subsequent to the year in which services are rendered
because of audits by the programs, rights of appeal and the application of numerous technical
provisions. In the opinion of management, adequate provision has been made for adjustments that may
result from such routine audits and appeals.
Professional, General and Workers Compensation Liability Risks
The Company is subject to claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of business,
including but not limited to claims relating to patient treatment and personal injuries. To cover
these types of claims, the Company maintains professional and general liability insurance in excess
of self-insured retentions through a commercial insurance carrier in amounts that the Company
believes to be sufficient for its operations, although, potentially, some claims may exceed the
scope of coverage in effect. Plaintiffs in these matters may request punitive or other damages that
may not be covered by insurance. The Company is currently not a party to any such proceedings that,
in the Companys opinion, would have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, financial
condition or results of operations. The Company expenses an estimate of the costs it expects to
incur under the self-insured retention exposure for professional and general liability claims using
historical claims data, demographic factors, severity factors, current incident logs and other
actuarial analysis. At December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, the Companys professional and
general liability accrual for asserted and unasserted claims totaled
$45.4 million and $41.6
million, respectively.
The Company is subject to claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of business relative
to workers compensation matters. To cover these types of claims, the Company maintains workers
compensation insurance coverage with a self-insured retention. The Company accrues costs of
workers compensation claims based upon estimates derived from its claims experience.
9
Table of Contents
IASIS HEALTHCARE LLC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Health Choice
Health Choice has entered into capitated contracts whereby the Plan provides healthcare
services in exchange for fixed periodic and supplemental payments from the Arizona Health Care Cost
Containment System (AHCCCS) and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These
services are provided regardless of the actual
costs incurred to provide these services. The Company receives reinsurance and other
supplemental payments from AHCCCS to cover certain costs of healthcare services that exceed certain
thresholds. The Company believes the capitated payments, together with reinsurance and other
supplemental payments are sufficient to pay for the services Health Choice is obligated to deliver.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company has provided a performance guaranty in the form of letters of
credit totaling $48.3 million for the benefit of AHCCCS to support Health Choices obligations
under its contract to provide and pay for the healthcare services. The amount of the
performance guaranty is generally based in part upon the membership in the Plan and the related
capitation revenue paid to Health Choice.
Acquisitions
The Company has acquired and in the future may choose to acquire businesses with prior
operating histories. Such businesses may have unknown or contingent liabilities, including
liabilities for failure to comply with healthcare laws and regulations, such as billing and
reimbursement, fraud and abuse and similar anti-referral laws. Although the Company has procedures
designed to conform business practices to its policies following the completion of any acquisition,
there can be no assurance that the Company will not become liable for previous activities of prior
owners that may later be asserted to be improper by private plaintiffs or government agencies.
Although the Company generally seeks to obtain indemnification from prospective sellers covering
such matters, there can be no assurance that any such matter will be covered by indemnification, or
if covered, that such indemnification will be adequate to cover potential losses and fines.
Other
On March 31, 2008, the United States District Court for the District of Arizona (District
Court) dismissed with prejudice the qui tam complaint against IAS, our parent company. The qui tam
action sought monetary damages and civil penalties under the federal
False Claims Act (FCA) and included
allegations that certain business practices related to physician relationships and the medical
necessity of certain procedures resulted in the submission of claims for reimbursement in violation
of the FCA. The case dates back to March 2005 and became the
subject of a subpoena by the Office of Inspector General in
September 2005. In August 2007, the case was unsealed and the U.S. Department of Justice declined
to intervene. The District Court dismissed the case from the bench at the conclusion of oral
arguments on IAS motion to dismiss. On April 21, 2008, the District Court issued a written order
dismissing the case with prejudice and entering formal judgment for IAS and denying as moot IAS
motions related to the relators misappropriation of information subject to a claim of
attorney-client privilege by IAS. Both parties appealed. On August 12, 2010, United States Court of
Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the District Courts dismissal of the qui tam complaint and
the District Courts denial of IAS motions concerning the relators misappropriation of documents and
ordered that the qui tam relator be allowed leave to file a Third Amended Complaint and for the
District Court to consider IAS motions concerning the relators misappropriation of documents. The
District Court ordered the qui tam relator to file his Third Amended Complaint by November 22,
2010, and set a schedule for the filing of motions related to the relators misappropriation of
documents. On October 20, 2010, the qui tam relator filed a motion to transfer this action to the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. That motion remains pending. On
November 22, 2010, the relator filed his Third Amended Complaint. On January 3, 2011, IAS filed its
renewed motion for sanctions concerning the relators misappropriation of documents and, on January
14, 2011, IAS filed its motion to dismiss the relators Third
Amended Complaint. The relators brief in
opposition to IAS motion to dismiss is due February 18, 2011 and IAS reply brief is due March 14,
2011. If the qui tam action were to be resolved in a manner unfavorable to the Company, it could
have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, financial condition and results of
operations, including exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. In addition, the Company
may incur material fees, costs and expenses in connection with defending the qui tam action.
10
Table of Contents
IASIS HEALTHCARE LLC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The Companys facilities obtain clinical and administrative services from a variety of
vendors. One vendor, a medical practice that furnished cardiac catheterization services under
contractual arrangements at Mesa General Hospital and St. Lukes Medical Center through March 31,
2008 and May 31, 2008, respectively, has asserted that, because of deferred fee adjustments that it
claims are due under these arrangements, it is owed additional amounts for services rendered since
April 1, 2006 at both facilities. The Company and the vendor were unable to reach an agreement with
respect to the amount of the fee adjustment, if any, that was contractually required, nor with
respect to an appropriate methodology for determining such amount. On September 30, 2008, the
vendor filed a state court complaint for an aggregate adjustment in excess of the amount accrued by
the Company, in addition to certain tort claims. On March 20, 2009, the
Company filed a Motion to Dismiss and in the alternative to
Compel Arbitration. On July 27, 2009, the court granted the Companys Motion to Compel Arbitration
on the grounds that the issues are to be determined by binding arbitration. On December 24, 2010,
after conducting the arbitration hearing, the arbitration panel issued its decision rejecting the
fees sought by the vendor, but did not adopt the fees proposed by the Company. The arbitration panel
required both parties to agree upon a settlement amount, based on the arbitration panels approved
methodology, by January 21, 2011. The Company has reviewed the methodology required by decision in
binding arbitration and determined it will result in a payment to the vendor of approximately $9.4
million. Of the additional liability resulting from the arbitration
panels decision, $4.8 million
($3.0 million, net of income taxes) is included in discontinued operations related to the closure
of Mesa General Hospital for the quarter ended December 31, 2010. The arbitration panel has not
rendered a decision with respect to the vendors claims for prejudgment interest, the parties
respective claims for fees and costs, nor with respect to any of vendors tort claims, which are
expected to be addressed in separate proceedings. The Company will continue to defend its interests
in connection with this arbitration proceeding, but expresses no opinion as to the outcome of
matters not yet decided by the arbitration panel.
In November 2010, the Department of Justice (DOJ) sent a letter to IAS requesting a 12-month
tolling agreement in connection with an investigation into Medicare claims submitted by our
hospitals in connection with the implantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs)
during the period 2003 to the present. At that time, neither the precise number of procedures,
number of claims nor the hospitals involved were identified by the DOJ. The Company understands
that the government is conducting a national initiative with respect to ICD procedures involving a
number of healthcare providers and is seeking information in order to determine if ICD implantation
procedures were performed in accordance with Medicare coverage requirements. On January 11, 2011,
IAS entered into the tolling agreement with the DOJ and, subsequently, the DOJ has provided IAS
with a list of 194 procedures involving ICDs at 14 hospitals which are the subject of further
medical necessity review by the DOJ. The Company is cooperating fully with the government and, to
date, the DOJ has not asserted any claim against the Companys hospitals.
8. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In August 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU) No. 2010-23, Health Care Entities (Topic 954): Measuring Charity Care for Disclosure. Due
to the lack of comparability existing as a result of the use of either revenue or cost as the basis
for disclosure of charity care, this ASU standardizes cost as the basis for charity care
disclosures and specifies the elements of cost to be used in charity care disclosures. ASU 2010-23
is effective for the Companys fiscal year beginning October 1, 2011 and is not expected to
significantly impact the Companys financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.
11
Table of Contents
IASIS HEALTHCARE LLC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
9. SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
The Companys acute care hospitals and related healthcare businesses are similar in their
activities and the economic environments in which they operate (i.e. urban and suburban markets).
Accordingly, the Companys reportable operating segments consist
of: (1) acute care hospitals and
related healthcare businesses, collectively; and (2) Health Choice. The following is a financial
summary by business segment for the periods indicated (in thousands):
For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Acute Care | Health Choice | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||
Acute care revenue |
$ | 471,139 | $ | | $ | | $ | 471,139 | ||||||||
Premium revenue |
| 202,192 | | 202,192 | ||||||||||||
Revenue between segments |
2,660 | | (2,660 | ) | | |||||||||||
Net revenue |
473,799 | 202,192 | (2,660 | ) | 673,331 | |||||||||||
Salaries and benefits (excludes
stock compensation) |
184,394 | 5,023 | | 189,417 | ||||||||||||
Supplies |
76,392 | 44 | | 76,436 | ||||||||||||
Medical claims |
| 173,994 | (2,660 | ) | 171,334 | |||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
90,830 | 6,296 | | 97,126 | ||||||||||||
Provision for bad debts |
59,614 | | | 59,614 | ||||||||||||
Rentals and leases |
10,722 | 444 | | 11,166 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA(1) |
51,847 | 16,391 | | 68,238 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
16,877 | | | 16,877 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
23,151 | 895 | | 24,046 | ||||||||||||
Stock compensation |
496 | | | 496 | ||||||||||||
Management fees |
1,250 | | | 1,250 | ||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing
operations before gain on
disposal of assets and income
taxes |
10,073 | 15,496 | | 25,569 | ||||||||||||
Gain on disposal of assets, net |
345 | | | 345 | ||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing
operations before income
taxes |
$ | 10,418 | $ | 15,496 | $ | | $ | 25,914 | ||||||||
Segment assets |
$ | 2,059,986 | $ | 326,396 | $ | 2,386,382 | ||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 15,360 | $ | | $ | 15,360 | ||||||||||
Goodwill |
$ | 792,637 | $ | 5,757 | $ | 798,394 | ||||||||||
12
Table of Contents
IASIS HEALTHCARE LLC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Acute Care | Health Choice | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||
Acute care revenue |
$ | 424,660 | $ | | $ | | $ | 424,660 | ||||||||
Premium revenue |
| 204,297 | | 204,297 | ||||||||||||
Revenue between segments |
2,676 | | (2,676 | ) | | |||||||||||
Net revenue |
427,336 | 204,297 | (2,676 | ) | 628,957 | |||||||||||
Salaries and benefits (excludes
stock compensation) |
165,769 | 4,592 | | 170,361 | ||||||||||||
Supplies |
65,362 | 47 | | 65,409 | ||||||||||||
Medical claims |
| 181,243 | (2,676 | ) | 178,567 | |||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
78,325 | 6,267 | | 84,592 | ||||||||||||
Provision for bad debts |
47,949 | | | 47,949 | ||||||||||||
Rentals and leases |
9,904 | 371 | | 10,275 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA(1) |
60,027 | 11,777 | | 71,804 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
16,732 | | | 16,732 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
22,988 | 889 | | 23,877 | ||||||||||||
Stock compensation |
121 | | | 121 | ||||||||||||
Management fees |
1,250 | | | 1,250 | ||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing
operations before gain on
disposal of assets and income
taxes |
18,936 | 10,888 | | 29,824 | ||||||||||||
Gain on disposal of assets, net |
104 | | | 104 | ||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing
operations before income
taxes |
$ | 19,040 | $ | 10,888 | $ | | $ | 29,928 | ||||||||
Segment assets |
$ | 2,085,057 | $ | 249,311 | $ | 2,334,368 | ||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 12,272 | $ | 10 | $ | 12,282 | ||||||||||
Goodwill |
$ | 712,163 | $ | 5,757 | $ | 717,920 | ||||||||||
(1) | Adjusted EBITDA represents net earnings from continuing operations before interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization, stock compensation, gain on disposal of assets and management fees. Management fees represent monitoring and advisory fees paid to TPG, the Companys majority financial sponsor, and certain other members of IASIS Investment LLC, majority shareholder of IAS. Management routinely calculates and communicates adjusted EBITDA and believes that it is useful to investors because it is commonly used as an analytical indicator within the healthcare industry to evaluate hospital performance, allocate resources and measure leverage capacity and debt service ability. In addition, the Company uses adjusted EBITDA as a measure of performance for its business segments and for incentive compensation purposes. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as a measure of financial performance under GAAP, and the items excluded from adjusted EBITDA are significant components in understanding and assessing financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to net earnings, cash flows generated by operating, investing, or financing activities or other financial statement data presented in the condensed consolidated financial statements as an indicator of financial performance or liquidity. Adjusted EBITDA, as presented, differs from what is defined under the Companys senior secured credit facilities and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. |
13
Table of Contents
IASIS HEALTHCARE LLC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
10. SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The 8 3/4% notes described in Note 2 are fully and unconditionally
guaranteed on a joint and several basis by all of the Companys existing domestic subsidiaries,
other than non-guarantor subsidiaries which include Health Choice and the Companys non-wholly
owned subsidiaries.
Effective October 1, 2010, the operations and net assets of Wadley Regional Medical Center,
acquired as part of Brim, are included in the subsidiary non-guarantor information in the following
summarized unaudited condensed consolidating financial statements.
Summarized condensed consolidating balance sheets at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010,
condensed consolidating statements of operations for the quarters ended December 31, 2010 and 2009,
and condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the quarters ended December 31, 2010 and
2009, for the Company, segregating the parent company issuer, the subsidiary guarantors, the
subsidiary non-guarantors and eliminations, are found below.
14
Table of Contents
IASIS HEALTHCARE LLC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
IASIS Healthcare LLC
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet (unaudited)
December 31, 2010
(in thousands)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet (unaudited)
December 31, 2010
(in thousands)
Subsidiary | Subsidiary | Condensed | ||||||||||||||||||
Parent Issuer | Guarantors | Non-Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash
equivalents |
$ | | $ | 123,011 | $ | 6,235 | $ | | $ | 129,246 | ||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
| 91,964 | 144,130 | | 236,094 | |||||||||||||||
Inventories |
| 23,575 | 35,506 | | 59,081 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
24,854 | | | | 24,854 | |||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other
current assets |
| 32,202 | 39,619 | | 71,821 | |||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
24,854 | 270,752 | 225,490 | | 521,096 | |||||||||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
| 349,082 | 648,685 | | 997,767 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany |
| (292,257 | ) | 292,257 | | | ||||||||||||||
Net investment in and advances
to subsidiaries |
1,835,755 | | | (1,835,755 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
7,701 | 83,257 | 707,436 | | 798,394 | |||||||||||||||
Other intangible assets, net |
| 7,184 | 26,250 | | 33,434 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets, net |
11,208 | 17,535 | 6,948 | | 35,691 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,879,518 | $ | 435,553 | $ | 1,907,066 | $ | (1,835,755 | ) | $ | 2,386,382 | |||||||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | | $ | 22,520 | $ | 55,469 | $ | | $ | 77,989 | ||||||||||
Salaries and benefits
payable |
| 18,319 | 17,261 | | 35,580 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable |
2,108 | (3,222 | ) | 3,222 | | 2,108 | ||||||||||||||
Medical claims payable |
| | 116,457 | | 116,457 | |||||||||||||||
Other accrued expenses and
other current liabilities |
| 37,966 | 62,295 | | 100,261 | |||||||||||||||
Current portion of
long-term debt and capital
lease obligations |
5,890 | 1,803 | 24,855 | (24,855 | ) | 7,693 | ||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
7,998 | 77,386 | 279,559 | (24,855 | ) | 340,088 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt and capital
lease obligations |
1,037,898 | 11,762 | 545,198 | (545,198 | ) | 1,049,660 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
108,566 | | | | 108,566 | |||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
| 63,684 | 633 | | 64,317 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
1,154,462 | 152,832 | 825,390 | (570,053 | ) | 1,562,631 | ||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interests with
redemption rights |
| 88,433 | | | 88,433 | |||||||||||||||
Equity: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Members equity |
725,056 | 184,026 | 1,081,676 | (1,265,702 | ) | 725,056 | ||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
| 10,262 | | | 10,262 | |||||||||||||||
Total equity |
725,056 | 194,288 | 1,081,676 | (1,265,702 | ) | 735,318 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 1,879,518 | $ | 435,553 | $ | 1,907,066 | $ | (1,835,755 | ) | $ | 2,386,382 | |||||||||
15
Table of Contents
IASIS HEALTHCARE LLC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
IASIS Healthcare LLC
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet (unaudited)
September 30, 2010
(in thousands)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet (unaudited)
September 30, 2010
(in thousands)
Subsidiary | Subsidiary | Condensed | ||||||||||||||||||
Parent Issuer | Guarantors | Non-Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | | $ | 143,599 | $ | 912 | $ | | $ | 144,511 | ||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
| 81,649 | 127,524 | | 209,173 | |||||||||||||||
Inventories |
| 22,793 | 31,049 | | 53,842 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
15,881 | | | | 15,881 | |||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other
current assets |
| 23,577 | 41,763 | | 65,340 | |||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
15,881 | 271,618 | 201,248 | | 488,747 | |||||||||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
| 351,265 | 634,026 | | 985,291 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany |
| (297,257 | ) | 297,257 | | | ||||||||||||||
Net investment in and advances
to subsidiaries |
1,823,973 | | | (1,823,973 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
17,331 | 65,504 | 635,408 | | 718,243 | |||||||||||||||
Other intangible assets, net |
| | 27,000 | | 27,000 | |||||||||||||||
Deposit for acquisition |
| 97,891 | | | 97,891 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets, net |
12,018 | 17,967 | 6,037 | | 36,022 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,869,203 | $ | 506,988 | $ | 1,800,976 | $ | (1,823,973 | ) | $ | 2,353,194 | |||||||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | | $ | 32,400 | $ | 46,531 | $ | | $ | 78,931 | ||||||||||
Salaries and benefits payable |
| 19,916 | 18,194 | | 38,110 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable |
12,536 | (3,237 | ) | 3,237 | | 12,536 | ||||||||||||||
Medical claims payable |
| | 111,373 | | 111,373 | |||||||||||||||
Other accrued expenses and
other current liabilities |
| 32,326 | 74,288 | | 106,614 | |||||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term
debt and capital lease
obligations |
5,890 | 801 | 20,570 | (20,570 | ) | 6,691 | ||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
18,426 | 82,206 | 274,193 | (20,570 | ) | 354,255 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt and capital
lease obligations |
1,039,370 | 5,517 | 547,170 | (547,170 | ) | 1,044,887 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
109,272 | | | | 109,272 | |||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
| 59,527 | 635 | | 60,162 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
1,167,068 | 147,250 | 821,998 | (567,740 | ) | 1,568,576 | ||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interests with
redemption rights |
| 72,112 | | | 72,112 | |||||||||||||||
Equity: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Members equity |
702,135 | 277,255 | 978,978 | (1,256,233 | ) | 702,135 | ||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
| 10,371 | | | 10,371 | |||||||||||||||
Total equity |
702,135 | 287,626 | 978,978 | (1,256,233 | ) | 712,506 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 1,869,203 | $ | 506,988 | $ | 1,800,976 | $ | (1,823,973 | ) | $ | 2,353,194 | |||||||||
16
Table of Contents
IASIS HEALTHCARE LLC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
IASIS Healthcare LLC
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2010 (unaudited)
(in thousands)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2010 (unaudited)
(in thousands)
Subsidiary | Subsidiary | Condensed | ||||||||||||||||||
Parent Issuer | Guarantors | Non-Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Acute care revenue |
$ | | $ | 184,286 | $ | 289,513 | $ | (2,660 | ) | $ | 471,139 | |||||||||
Premium revenue |
| | 202,192 | | 202,192 | |||||||||||||||
Total net revenue |
| 184,286 | 491,705 | (2,660 | ) | 673,331 | ||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
| 93,343 | 96,570 | | 189,913 | |||||||||||||||
Supplies |
| 30,767 | 45,669 | | 76,436 | |||||||||||||||
Medical claims |
| | 173,994 | (2,660 | ) | 171,334 | ||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
| 32,728 | 64,398 | | 97,126 | |||||||||||||||
Provision for bad debts |
| 25,493 | 34,121 | | 59,614 | |||||||||||||||
Rentals and leases |
| 4,590 | 6,576 | | 11,166 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
16,877 | | 10,390 | (10,390 | ) | 16,877 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization |
| 9,996 | 14,050 | | 24,046 | |||||||||||||||
Management fees |
1,250 | (6,181 | ) | 6,181 | | 1,250 | ||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of
affiliates |
(26,789 | ) | | | 26,789 | | ||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
(8,662 | ) | 190,736 | 451,949 | 13,739 | 647,762 | ||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from
continuing operations before
gain (loss) on disposal of assets and
income taxes |
8,662 | (6,450 | ) | 39,756 | (16,399 | ) | 25,569 | |||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on disposal of assets, net |
| 364 | (19 | ) | | 345 | ||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from
continuing operations before
income taxes |
8,662 | (6,086 | ) | 39,737 | (16,399 | ) | 25,914 | |||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
9,189 | | | | 9,189 | |||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) from
continuing operations |
(527 | ) | (6,086 | ) | 39,737 | (16,399 | ) | 16,725 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from
discontinued operations, net
of income taxes |
1,883 | (5,031 | ) | (60 | ) | | (3,208 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
1,356 | (11,117 | ) | 39,677 | (16,399 | ) | 13,517 | |||||||||||||
Net earnings attributable to
non-controlling interests |
| (1,771 | ) | | | (1,771 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss)
attributable to IASIS
Healthcare LLC |
$ | 1,356 | $ | (12,888 | ) | $ | 39,677 | $ | (16,399 | ) | $ | 11,746 | ||||||||
17
Table of Contents
IASIS HEALTHCARE LLC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
IASIS Healthcare LLC
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2009 (unaudited)
(in thousands)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2009 (unaudited)
(in thousands)
Subsidiary | Subsidiary | Condensed | ||||||||||||||||||
Parent Issuer | Guarantors | Non-Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Acute care revenue |
$ | | $ | 171,301 | $ | 256,035 | $ | (2,676 | ) | $ | 424,660 | |||||||||
Premium revenue |
| | 204,297 | | 204,297 | |||||||||||||||
Total net revenue |
| 171,301 | 460,332 | (2,676 | ) | 628,957 | ||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
| 86,609 | 83,873 | | 170,482 | |||||||||||||||
Supplies |
| 27,438 | 37,971 | | 65,409 | |||||||||||||||
Medical claims |
| | 181,243 | (2,676 | ) | 178,567 | ||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
| 29,889 | 54,703 | | 84,592 | |||||||||||||||
Provision for bad debts |
| 22,323 | 25,626 | | 47,949 | |||||||||||||||
Rentals and leases |
| 4,426 | 5,849 | | 10,275 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
16,732 | | 9,744 | (9,744 | ) | 16,732 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization |
| 9,910 | 13,967 | | 23,877 | |||||||||||||||
Management fees |
1,250 | (5,564 | ) | 5,564 | | 1,250 | ||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of
affiliates |
(36,212 | ) | | | 36,212 | | ||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
(18,230 | ) | 175,031 | 418,540 | 23,792 | 599,133 | ||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from
continuing operations before
gain on disposal of assets and
income taxes |
18,230 | (3,730 | ) | 41,792 | (26,468 | ) | 29,824 | |||||||||||||
Gain on disposal of assets, net |
| 76 | 28 | | 104 | |||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from
continuing operations before
income taxes |
18,230 | (3,654 | ) | 41,820 | (26,468 | ) | 29,928 | |||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
10,591 | | | | 10,591 | |||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) from
continuing operations |
7,639 | (3,654 | ) | 41,820 | (26,468 | ) | 19,337 | |||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from
discontinued operations, net
of income taxes |
(28 | ) | 75 | (1 | ) | | 46 | |||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
7,611 | (3,579 | ) | 41,819 | (26,468 | ) | 19,383 | |||||||||||||
Net earnings attributable to
non-controlling interests |
| (2,028 | ) | | | (2,028 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss)
attributable to IASIS
Healthcare LLC |
$ | 7,611 | $ | (5,607 | ) | $ | 41,819 | $ | (26,468 | ) | $ | 17,355 | ||||||||
18
Table of Contents
IASIS HEALTHCARE LLC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
IASIS Healthcare LLC
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2010 (unaudited)
(in thousands)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2010 (unaudited)
(in thousands)
Subsidiary | Subsidiary | Condensed | ||||||||||||||||||
Parent Issuer | Guarantors | Non-Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
$ | 1,356 | $ | (11,117 | ) | $ | 39,677 | $ | (16,399 | ) | $ | 13,517 | ||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings
(loss) to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Loss (earnings) from discontinued
operations |
(1,883 | ) | 5,031 | 60 | | 3,208 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 9,996 | 14,050 | | 24,046 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of loan costs |
810 | | | | 810 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
2,539 | | | | 2,539 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit from parent company
interest |
2,240 | | | | 2,240 | |||||||||||||||
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets, net |
| (364 | ) | 19 | | (345 | ) | |||||||||||||
Stock compensation |
496 | | | | 496 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
(26,789 | ) | | | 26,789 | | ||||||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities, net of the effect of acquisitions and
dispositions: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
| (4,451 | ) | (3,883 | ) | | (8,334 | ) | ||||||||||||
Inventories, prepaid expenses and
other current assets |
| (12,280 | ) | 6,324 | | (5,956 | ) | |||||||||||||
Accounts payable, other accrued
expenses and other accrued
liabilities |
(10,428 | ) | (2,105 | ) | (12,966 | ) | | (25,499 | ) | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities continuing
operations |
(31,659 | ) | (15,290 | ) | 43,281 | 10,390 | 6,722 | |||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities discontinued
operations |
(1,883 | ) | 1,643 | | | (240 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities |
(33,542 | ) | (13,647 | ) | 43,281 | 10,390 | 6,482 | |||||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment, net |
| (6,597 | ) | (8,763 | ) | | (15,360 | ) | ||||||||||||
Payment for acquisitions |
| (574 | ) | (1,306 | ) | | (1,880 | ) | ||||||||||||
Change in other assets, net |
| (3,826 | ) | 4,341 | | 515 | ||||||||||||||
Net cash
used in investing activities |
| (10,997 | ) | (5,728 | ) | | (16,725 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Payment of debt and capital lease
obligations |
(1,474 | ) | | (459 | ) | | (1,933 | ) | ||||||||||||
Distributions to non-controlling interests |
| (33 | ) | (3,056 | ) | | (3,089 | ) | ||||||||||||
Change in intercompany balances with
affiliates, net |
35,016 | 4,089 | (28,715 | ) | (10,390 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities |
33,542 | 4,056 | (32,230 | ) | (10,390 | ) | (5,022 | ) | ||||||||||||
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
| (20,588 | ) | 5,323 | | (15,265 | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
period |
| 143,599 | 912 | | 144,511 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | | $ | 123,011 | $ | 6,235 | $ | | $ | 129,246 | ||||||||||
19
Table of Contents
IASIS HEALTHCARE LLC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
IASIS Healthcare LLC
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2009 (unaudited)
(in thousands)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2009 (unaudited)
(in thousands)
Subsidiary | Subsidiary | Condensed | ||||||||||||||||||
Parent Issuer | Guarantors | Non-Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
$ | 7,611 | $ | (3,579 | ) | $ | 41,819 | $ | (26,468 | ) | $ | 19,383 | ||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings
(loss) to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Loss (earnings) from discontinued
operations |
28 | (75 | ) | 1 | | (46 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 9,910 | 13,967 | | 23,877 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of loan costs |
775 | | | | 775 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
2,652 | | | | 2,652 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit from parent company
interest |
2,224 | | | | 2,224 | |||||||||||||||
Gain on disposal of assets, net |
| (76 | ) | (28 | ) | | (104 | ) | ||||||||||||
Stock compensation |
121 | | | | 121 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
(36,212 | ) | | | 36,212 | | ||||||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities, net of the effect of
dispositions: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
| (659 | ) | (3,673 | ) | | (4,332 | ) | ||||||||||||
Inventories, prepaid expenses and
other current assets |
| (3,409 | ) | 7,895 | | 4,486 | ||||||||||||||
Accounts payable, other accrued
expenses and other accrued
liabilities |
(10,406 | ) | (13,783 | ) | (15,184 | ) | | (39,373 | ) | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities continuing
operations |
(33,207 | ) | (11,671 | ) | 44,797 | 9,744 | 9,663 | |||||||||||||
Net cash used in
operating activities discontinued
operations |
(28 | ) | (97 | ) | | | (125 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities |
(33,235 | ) | (11,768 | ) | 44,797 | 9,744 | 9,538 | |||||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment, net |
| (5,620 | ) | (6,662 | ) | | (12,282 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets |
| 3 | 28 | | 31 | |||||||||||||||
Change in other assets, net |
| 414 | 245 | | 659 | |||||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
| (5,203 | ) | (6,389 | ) | | (11,592 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Payment of debt and capital lease
obligations |
(3,016 | ) | (34 | ) | (402 | ) | | (3,452 | ) | |||||||||||
Distributions to non-controlling interests |
| (66 | ) | (3,868 | ) | | (3,934 | ) | ||||||||||||
Costs paid
for the repurchase of partnership interests, net |
| (13 | ) | | | (13 | ) | |||||||||||||
Change in intercompany balances with
affiliates, net |
36,251 | 7,631 | (34,138 | ) | (9,744 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities |
33,235 | 7,518 | (38,408 | ) | (9,744 | ) | (7,399 | ) | ||||||||||||
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
| (9,453 | ) | | | (9,453 | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
period |
| 206,331 | 197 | | 206,528 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | | $ | 196,878 | $ | 197 | $ | | $ | 197,075 | ||||||||||
20
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should
be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, the notes to
our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the other financial information
appearing elsewhere in this report. Data for the quarters ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, has
been derived from our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. References herein to
we, our and us are to IASIS Healthcare LLC and its subsidiaries.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements we make in this report are forward-looking within the meaning of the
federal securities laws, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created thereby.
Those forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical statements of fact
and those regarding our intent, belief or expectations including, but not limited to, the
discussions of our operating and growth strategy (including possible acquisitions and
dispositions), financing needs, projections of revenue, income or loss, capital expenditures and
future operations. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties
that may cause actual results in future periods to differ materially from those anticipated in the
forward-looking statements. Those risks and uncertainties include, among others, our ability to
retain and negotiate reasonable contracts with managed care plans,
the impact of the federal healthcare reform, changes in governmental healthcare programs, our hospitals competition for patients from
other hospitals and healthcare providers, the shift in payor mix from commercial and managed care
payors to medicaid and managed medicaid, our hospitals facing a growth in volume and revenue
related to uncompensated care, our ability to recruit and retain quality physicians, our hospitals
competition for staffing which may increase our labor costs and reduce profitability, our failure
to continually enhance our hospitals with the most recent technological advances in diagnostic and
surgical equipment that may adversely affect our ability to maintain and expand our markets, our
failure to comply with extensive laws and government regulations, the health reform law that
imposes significant restrictions on hospitals that have physician owners, expenses incurred in
connection with an appeal of the court order dismissing with prejudice the qui tam litigation, the
possibility that we may become subject to federal and state investigations in the future, our
ability to satisfy regulatory requirements with respect to our internal controls over financial
reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, a failure of our information systems
that would adversely affect our ability to properly manage our operations, failure to effectively
and timely implement electronic health record systems, an economic downturn or other material
change in any one of the regions in which we operate, potential liabilities because of claims
brought against our facilities, our ability to control costs at Health Choice Arizona, Inc.
(Health Choice or the Plan), the impact of any significant alteration to the Arizona Health
Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS) payment structure of its contracts, the possibility of
Health Choices contract with the AHCCCS being discontinued, significant competition from other
healthcare companies and state efforts to regulate the sale of not-for-profit hospitals that may
affect our ability to acquire hospitals, difficulties with the integration of acquisitions that may
disrupt our ongoing operations, our dependence on key personnel, the loss of one or more of which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, potential responsibilities and costs under
environmental laws that could lead to material expenditures or liability, the possibility of a
decline in the fair value of our reporting units that could result in a material non-cash charge to
earnings, the risks and uncertainties related to our ability to generate sufficient cash to service
our existing indebtedness, our substantial level of indebtedness that could adversely affect our
financial condition, the possibility of an increase in interest rates, which would increase the
cost of servicing our debt and could reduce profitability, risks associated with us being owned by equity sponsors who have the ability to control our financial decisions and those risks, uncertainties and other
matters detailed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010,
and in our subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
21
Table of Contents
Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained
in this report are reasonable, any of these assumptions could prove to be inaccurate and,
therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this report
will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the
forward-looking statements included in this report, you should not regard the inclusion of such
information as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be
achieved. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to any forward-looking
statements contained herein to reflect events and circumstances occurring after the date hereof or
to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
We are a leading owner and operator of medium-sized acute care hospitals in high-growth urban
and suburban markets. We operate our hospitals with a strong community focus by offering and
developing healthcare services targeted to the needs of the markets we serve, promoting strong
relationships with physicians and working with local managed care plans. At December 31, 2010, we
owned or leased 17 acute care hospital facilities and one behavioral health hospital facility, with
a total of 3,570 licensed beds, located in seven regions:
| Salt Lake City, Utah; | ||
| Phoenix, Arizona; | ||
| Tampa-St. Petersburg, Florida; | ||
| four cities in Texas, including San Antonio; | ||
| Las Vegas, Nevada; | ||
| West Monroe, Louisiana; and | ||
| Woodland Park, Colorado. |
Effective October 1, 2010, through a cash-for-stock acquisition of Brim Holdings, Inc.
(Brim), we added to our business two acute care hospital
facilities: one, a 370-bed acute care hospital facility in Texarkana, Texas; and the other a 15-bed
critical access acute care hospital facility in Woodland Park, Colorado.
We also own and operate Health Choice, a Medicaid and Medicare managed health plan in Phoenix,
Arizona, that serves over 197,000 members.
Significant Industry Trends
The following sections discuss recent trends that we believe are significant factors in our
current and/or future operating results and cash flows. Certain of these trends apply to the entire
acute care hospital industry, while others may apply to us more specifically. These trends could be
short-term in nature or could require long-term attention and resources. While these trends may
involve certain factors that are outside of our control, the extent to which these trends affect
our hospitals and our ability to manage the impact of these trends play vital roles in our current
and future success. In many cases, we are unable to predict what impact these trends, if any, will
have on us.
The Impact of Health Reform
The recently enacted Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care
and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the Health Reform Law), will change how
healthcare services are covered, delivered, and reimbursed through expanded coverage of previously
uninsured individuals and reduced government healthcare spending. In addition, as enacted, the law
reforms certain aspects of health insurance, expands existing efforts to tie Medicare and Medicaid
payments to performance and quality, places restrictions on physician owned hospitals, and contains
provisions intended to strengthen fraud and abuse enforcement. Because of the many variables
involved, including the laws complexity, lack of implementing regulations or interpretive
guidance, gradual and potentially delayed implementation, pending
efforts to repeal or amend portions
of the Health Reform Law in the United States Congress and ongoing
federal court cases challenging the constitutionality of the Health
Reform Law, the impact of
the Health Reform Law, including how individuals and businesses will
respond to the new choice afforded them, is not yet fully known.
22
Table of Contents
Payor Mix Shift
Like others in the hospital industry, in recent quarters we have experienced a shift in our
patient volumes and revenue from commercial and managed care payors to Medicaid and managed
Medicaid. This has resulted in margin pressures created from expending the same amount of resources
to provide patient care, but for less reimbursement. This shift is reflective of continued high
unemployment and the resulting increases in states Medicaid rolls. The decline in managed care
volume and revenue mix is not only indicative of the depressed labor market, but also utilization
behavior of the insured population resulting from higher deductible and co-insurance plans
implemented by employers, which, in turn, has resulted in delays or the deferral of elective and
non-emergent procedures. Given the high rate of unemployment and its impact on the economy,
particularly in the markets we serve, we expect the elevated levels in our Medicaid and managed
Medicaid payor mixes to continue until the U.S. economy experiences an economic recovery that
includes job growth and declining unemployment.
Value-Based Reimbursement
There is a trend in the healthcare industry towards value-based purchasing of healthcare
services. These value-based purchasing programs include both public reporting and financial
incentives tied to the quality and efficiency of care provided by facilities. The Health Reform Law
recently enacted by Congress expands the use of value-based purchasing initiatives in federal
healthcare programs. We expect programs of this type to become more common in the healthcare
industry.
Medicare requires providers to report certain quality measures in order to receive full
reimbursement increases for inpatient and outpatient procedures that previously were awarded automatically. The Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS) has expanded, through a series of rulemakings, the number of patient care
indicators that hospitals must report. Additionally, we anticipate that CMS will continue to expand the number of inpatient and outpatient
quality measures. We have invested significant capital and resources in the implementation of our
advanced clinical system that assists us in monitoring and reporting these quality measures. CMS
makes the data submitted by hospitals, including our hospitals, public on its website.
Medicare no longer pays hospitals additional amounts for the treatment of certain preventable
adverse events, also known as hospital acquired conditions (HACs), unless the condition was
present at admission. The Health Reform Law, meanwhile, prohibits the
use of federal funds under the Medicaid program to reimburse
providers for treating HACs. The Health Reform Law also requires the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (the
Department) to implement a value-based purchasing
program for inpatient hospital services. Beginning in federal fiscal year 2013, the Department will
reduce inpatient hospital payments for all discharges by a percentage specified by statute ranging
from 1% to 2% and pool the total amount collected from these reductions to fund payments to reward
hospitals that meet or exceed certain quality
performance standards established by the Department.
Many large commercial payors currently require providers to report quality data. Several
commercial payors have announced that they will stop reimbursing hospitals for certain preventable
adverse events. A number of state hospital associations have also announced policies addressing the
waiver of patient bills for care related to a serious adverse event. In addition, managed care
organizations may begin programs that condition payment on performance against specified measures.
The quality measurement criteria used by commercial payors may be similar to or even more stringent
than Medicare requirements.
We expect these trends towards value-based purchasing of healthcare services by Medicare and
other payors to continue. Because of these trends, if we are unable
to meet or exceed quality of care
standards in our facilities, our operating results could be significantly impacted in the future.
23
Table of Contents
Physician Alignment and Integration
In an effort to meet community needs and address coverage issues, we continue to
seek alignment with physicians through various recruitment and
employment strategies. Our ability to
attract and retain skilled physicians to our hospitals is critical to our success and is affected
by the quality of care at our hospitals. This is one reason we have taken significant steps in
implementing our expanded quality of care initiatives. We believe intense efforts focusing on
quality of care will enhance our ability to recruit and retain the skilled physicians necessary to
make our hospitals successful.
We experience certain risks associated with the integration of medical staffs at our
hospitals. As we continue to focus on our physician employment strategy, we face significant
competition for skilled physicians in certain of our markets as more hospital providers adopt a
physician staffing model approach, coupled with a general shortage of physicians across most
specialties. This increased competition has resulted in efforts by managed care organizations to
align with certain provider networks in the markets in which we operate. While we expect
that employing physicians should provide relief on cost pressures associated with on-call coverage
and other professional fees, we anticipate incurring additional labor and other start-up related
costs as we continue the integration of employed physicians.
We also face risk from competition for outpatient business. We expect to mitigate this risk
through continued focus on our physician employment strategy, our commitment to capital investment
in our hospitals, including updated technology and equipment, and our commitment to our quality of
care initiatives that some competitors, including individual physicians or physician groups, may
not be equipped to implement.
Uncompensated Care
Like others in the hospital industry, we continue to experience high levels of uncompensated
care, including charity care and bad debts. These elevated levels are driven by the number of
uninsured and under-insured patients seeking care at our hospitals, increasing healthcare costs and
other factors beyond our control, such as increases in the amount of co-payments and deductibles as
employers continue to pass more of these costs on to their employees. In addition, as a result of
high unemployment and its impact on the economy, we believe that our hospitals may continue to
experience high levels of or possibly growth in bad debts and charity care. During the quarter
ended December 31, 2010, our uncompensated care as a percentage
of acute care revenue, which includes the impact of charity care, was 14.9%,
compared to 12.9% in the prior year quarter.
We continue to monitor our self-pay admissions on a daily basis and continue to focus on the
efficiency of our emergency rooms, point-of-service cash collections, Medicaid eligibility
automation and process-flow improvements. We have had success in qualifying many uninsured patients
for Medicaid or other third-party coverage, which has helped to alleviate some of the pressure
created from the growth in our uncompensated care.
We anticipate that if we experience further growth in uninsured volume and revenue over the
near-term, along
with continued increases in co-payments and deductibles for insured patients, our
uncompensated care will increase and our results of operations could be adversely affected.
24
Table of Contents
The percentages of insured and uninsured gross hospital receivables (prior to allowances for
contractual adjustments and doubtful accounts) are summarized as follows:
December 31, | September 30, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
Insured receivables |
61.4 | % | 61.8 | % | ||||
Uninsured receivables |
38.6 | % | 38.2 | % | ||||
Total |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
The percentages in the table above are calculated using gross receivable balances. Uninsured
receivables and insured receivables are net of discounts and contractual adjustments recorded at
the time of billing. Included in insured receivables are accounts that are pending approval from
Medicaid. These receivables were 2.3% and 3.0% of gross hospital receivables at
December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, respectively.
The percentages of gross hospital receivables in summarized aging categories are
as follows:
December 31, | September 30, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
0 to 90 days |
69.3 | % | 69.4 | % | ||||
91 to 180 days |
16.7 | % | 18.1 | % | ||||
Over 180 days |
14.0 | % | 12.5 | % | ||||
Total |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
Revenue and Volume Trends
Net revenue for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 increased 7.1% to $673.3 million, compared
to $629.0 million in the prior year quarter. Net revenue is comprised of acute care and premium
revenue. Acute care operations have contributed $46.5 million to the revenue increase, which
includes the impact of the Brim acquisition, while premium revenue at Health Choice declined $2.1
million.
Acute Care Revenue
Acute care revenue is comprised of net patient revenue and other revenue. A large percentage
of our hospitals net patient revenue consists of fixed payment, discounted sources, including
Medicare, Medicaid and managed care organizations. Reimbursement for Medicare and Medicaid services
are often fixed regardless of the cost incurred or the level of services provided. Similarly, a
greater percentage of the managed care companies we contract with reimburse providers on a fixed
payment basis regardless of the costs incurred or the level of services provided. Net patient
revenue is reported net of discounts and contractual adjustments. The contractual adjustments
principally result from differences between the hospitals established charges and payment rates
under Medicare, Medicaid and various managed care plans. Additionally, discounts and contractual
adjustments result from our uninsured discount and charity care programs. Other revenue includes
medical office building rental income and other miscellaneous revenue.
Certain of our acute care hospitals receive supplemental Medicaid reimbursement, including
reimbursement from programs for participating private hospitals that enter into indigent care
affiliation agreements with public hospitals or county governments in the state of Texas. Under the
CMS approved programs, affiliated hospitals, including our Texas hospitals, have expanded the
community healthcare safety net by providing indigent healthcare services. Participation in
indigent care affiliation agreements by our Texas hospitals has resulted in an increase in acute
care revenue by virtue of the hospitals entitlement to supplemental Medicaid inpatient
reimbursement. Revenue recognized under these Texas private supplemental Medicaid reimbursement
programs for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, was $17.0 million, compared to $15.9 million in
the prior year quarter.
25
Table of Contents
Admissions and adjusted admissions increased 3.8% and 7.7%, respectively, for the quarter
ended December 31, 2010, compared to the prior year quarter. On a same-facility basis, admissions
and adjusted admissions declined 4.4% and 1.5%, respectively, for the quarter ended December 31,
2010, compared to the prior year quarter. On a
same-facility basis, our volume has been negatively impacted, in part, by an overall decline
in obstetric related services, resulting from the impact of the current economic environment and
the closure of our obstetrics service line on January 1, 2010, at our North Las Vegas hospital.
Excluding this service line closure, admissions decreased 3.0% and adjusted admissions were flat
for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, while inpatient and
outpatient surgeries increased 1.1% and 3.8%, respectively, each compared to the prior year quarter. We believe that
volumes continue to be negatively impacted, in part, by the effect of the economic climate in our
markets, including the impact of high unemployment and patient decisions to defer or cancel
elective procedures, general primary care and other non-emergent healthcare procedures until their
conditions become more acute. The deferral of non-emergent procedures has also been facilitated by
an increase in the number of high deductible employer sponsored health plans, which ultimately
shift more of the medical cost responsibility onto the patient. As a result, these factors have
contributed to a 3.8% decline in same-facility emergency room visits, compared to the
prior year quarter.
We believe our volumes over the long-term will grow as a result of our business strategies,
including the strategic deployment of capital, the expansion of our physician base and the general
aging of the population.
The
sources of our gross patient revenue by payor are summarized as
follows:
Quarter | ||||||||
Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Medicare |
30.9 | % | 30.4 | % | ||||
Managed Medicare |
12.1 | % | 11.2 | % | ||||
Medicaid |
9.1 | % | 8.9 | % | ||||
Managed Medicaid |
11.1 | % | 11.9 | % | ||||
Managed care and other |
31.2 | % | 32.8 | % | ||||
Self-pay |
5.6 | % | 4.8 | % | ||||
Total |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
Consistent with industry trends, we have experienced a shift in our patient volumes and
revenue out of commercial and managed care payors. This shift has resulted in higher than normal
Medicaid and managed Medicaid utilization. Given the high rate of unemployment and its impact on
the economy, particularly in the markets we serve, we expect the elevated levels in our Medicaid
and managed Medicaid payor mixes to continue until the U.S. economy experiences an economic
recovery that includes job growth and declining unemployment.
Additionally, we have experienced an increase in managed Medicare utilization, which is the result of incentives put in place
by the federal government to move more beneficiaries to managed Medicare plans, as well as the
general aging of the population.
Net patient revenue per adjusted admission increased 3.0% for the quarter ended December 31,
2010, while increasing 4.7% on a same-facility basis, both compared to the prior year quarter. While our net patient revenue per adjusted admission
continues to increase, the impact of continuing high unemployment and other industry pressures,
including elevated levels of Medicaid and managed Medicaid, which typically result in lower
reimbursement on a per adjusted admission basis, have contributed to moderating rates of pricing
growth. Additionally, the impact of state budgetary issues on Medicaid funding, which has resulted
in rate freezes and, in some cases, rate cuts to providers, has caused a decline in pricing related
to Medicaid and managed Medicaid volumes. As states continue working through their budgetary
issues, any additional cuts to Medicaid funding would negatively impact our future pricing and
earnings.
See Item 1 Business Sources of Acute Care Revenue and Item 1 Business
Government Regulation and Other Factors included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on December 21, 2010 for a description of the types of payments we receive for services provided to patients
enrolled in the traditional Medicare plan, managed Medicare plans, Medicaid plans, managed Medicaid
plans and managed care plans. In those sections, we also discussed the unique reimbursement
features of the traditional Medicare plan, including the annual Medicare regulatory updates
published by CMS that impact reimbursement rates for services
provided under the plan. The future potential impact to reimbursement
for certain of these payors
under the Health Reform Law was also addressed in such Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
26
Table of Contents
Premium Revenue
Premium revenue generated under the AHCCCS and CMS contracts with Health Choice represented
30.0% of our consolidated net revenue for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, compared to 32.5% in the prior year quarter. Most premium revenue at Health Choice is derived
through a contract with AHCCCS to provide specified health services to qualified Medicaid enrollees
through contracted providers. AHCCCS is the state agency that administers Arizonas Medicaid
program. The contract requires Health Choice to arrange for healthcare services for enrolled
Medicaid patients in exchange for fixed monthly premiums, based upon negotiated per capita member
rates, and supplemental payments from AHCCCS. Health Choice also contracts with CMS to provide
coverage as a Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MAPD) Special Needs Plan (SNP). This
contract allows Health Choice to offer Medicare and Part D drug benefit coverage to new and
existing dual-eligible members (i.e., those that are eligible for Medicare and Medicaid). Effective
for this 2011 plan year, SNPs are required to meet additional CMS requirements, including
requirements relating to model of care, cost-sharing, disclosure of information and reporting of
quality measures.
Health Choices enrollment through its AHCCCS contract at December 31, 2010, exceeded 193,000
members, compared to over 194,000 members in the prior year quarter.
The Health Reform Law reduces, over a three-year period, premium payments to managed Medicare
plans such that CMS managed care per capita premium payments are, on average, equal to traditional
Medicare. The Health Reform Law implements fee adjustments based on service benchmarks and quality
ratings. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that, as a result of these changes,
payments to plans will be reduced by $138.0 billion between 2010 and 2019, while CMS estimated the
reduction to be $145.0 billion.
Premiums received from AHCCCS and CMS to provide services to our members, which have been
declining on a per member per month basis, will be further affected by the significant budgetary
concerns that continue to face the state of Arizona. As Arizona continues working to eliminate its
budget deficit, its current budget for fiscal year 2011 includes additional reimbursement
cuts, including elimination of Medicaid coverage for some services and a cut of up to 5% for all
Medicaid providers beginning in April 2011. In an effort to relieve some of the budget pressures,
on May 18, 2010, voters passed a sales tax referendum that would temporarily raise money at the
state level to help fund these budgetary shortfalls. The state legislature may have to consider
additional cuts to Medicaid funding beyond the initial 5% that is planned for fiscal 2011, as a
result of the impact of the Health Reform Law and the expiration of the enhanced federal medical
assistance percentage (FMAP), which was originally implemented in 2009 by the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). In an effort to address the states projected fiscal 2012
budget shortfall, the Governor of Arizona has requested a waiver from the maintenance of efforts
requirements of the Health Reform Law in order to eliminate Medicaid coverage for approximately
280,000 childless adults. Elimination of these members from Medicaid eligibility could materially
impact our premium revenue and earnings. Depending upon member mix, we generally believe Health
Choice could continue to experience a decline in rates received on a per member per month basis,
which may negatively impact our premium revenue over the near-term.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
A summary of significant accounting policies is disclosed in Note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30,
2010. Our critical accounting policies are further described under the caption Critical Accounting
Policies and Estimates in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010. There have
been no changes in the nature of our critical accounting policies or the application of those
policies since September 30, 2010.
27
Table of Contents
SELECTED OPERATING DATA
The following table sets forth certain unaudited operating data for each of the periods
presented.
Quarter | ||||||||
Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Acute Care: |
||||||||
Number of acute care hospital facilities at end of period |
17 | 15 | ||||||
Licensed beds at end of period (1) |
3,570 | 3,185 | ||||||
Average length of stay (days) (2) |
4.9 | 4.8 | ||||||
Occupancy rates (average beds in service) |
45.3 | % | 45.4 | % | ||||
Admissions (3) |
26,202 | 25,253 | ||||||
Adjusted admissions (4) |
45,312 | 42,067 | ||||||
Patient days (5) |
127,807 | 120,551 | ||||||
Adjusted patient days (4) |
211,696 | 193,223 | ||||||
Net patient revenue per adjusted admission |
$ | 10,325 | $ | 10,026 | ||||
Same-Facility
Acute Care (6): |
||||||||
Number of acute care hospital facilities at end of period |
15 | 15 | ||||||
Licensed beds at end of period (1) |
3,185 | 3,185 | ||||||
Average length of stay (days) (2) |
4.9 | 4.8 | ||||||
Occupancy rates (average beds in service) |
44.8 | % | 45.4 | % | ||||
Admissions (3) |
24,137 | 25,253 | ||||||
Adjusted admissions (4) |
41,436 | 42,067 | ||||||
Patient days (5) |
119,284 | 120,551 | ||||||
Adjusted patient days (4) |
196,045 | 193,223 | ||||||
Net patient revenue per adjusted admission |
$ | 10,497 | $ | 10,026 | ||||
Health Choice: |
||||||||
Medicaid covered lives |
193,126 | 194,195 | ||||||
Dual-eligible lives (7) |
4,332 | 3,997 | ||||||
Medical loss ratio (8) |
86.1 | % | 88.7 | % |
(1) | Includes St. Lukes Behavioral Hospital. | |
(2) | Represents the average number of days that a patient stayed in our hospitals. | |
(3) | Represents the total number of patients admitted to our hospitals for stays in excess of 23 hours. Management and investors use this number as a general measure of inpatient volume. | |
(4) | Adjusted admissions and adjusted patient days are general measures of combined inpatient and outpatient volume. We compute adjusted admissions/patient days by multiplying admissions/patient days by gross patient revenue and then dividing that number by gross inpatient revenue. | |
(5) | Represents the number of days our beds were occupied by inpatients over the period. | |
(6) | Excludes the impact of the Brim acquisition, which was effective October 1, 2010. | |
(7) | Represents members eligible for Medicare and Medicaid benefits under Health Choices contract with CMS to provide coverage as a MAPD SNP. | |
(8) | Represents medical claims expense as a percentage of premium revenue, including claims paid to our hospitals. |
28
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS SUMMARY
Consolidated
The following table sets forth, for the periods presented, our results of
consolidated operations expressed in dollar terms and as a percentage of net revenue. Such
information has been derived from our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | Amount | Percentage | Amount | Percentage | ||||||||||||
Net revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Acute care revenue |
$ | 471,139 | 70.0 | % | $ | 424,660 | 67.5 | % | ||||||||
Premium revenue |
202,192 | 30.0 | % | 204,297 | 32.5 | % | ||||||||||
Total net revenue |
673,331 | 100.0 | % | 628,957 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
189,913 | 28.2 | % | 170,482 | 27.1 | % | ||||||||||
Supplies |
76,436 | 11.4 | % | 65,409 | 10.4 | % | ||||||||||
Medical claims |
171,334 | 25.4 | % | 178,567 | 28.4 | % | ||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
97,126 | 14.4 | % | 84,592 | 13.4 | % | ||||||||||
Provision for bad debts |
59,614 | 8.9 | % | 47,949 | 7.6 | % | ||||||||||
Rentals and leases |
11,166 | 1.7 | % | 10,275 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
16,877 | 2.5 | % | 16,732 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
24,046 | 3.5 | % | 23,877 | 3.8 | % | ||||||||||
Management fees |
1,250 | 0.2 | % | 1,250 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
647,762 | 96.2 | % | 599,133 | 95.3 | % | ||||||||||
Earnings from continuing
operations before gain on
disposal of assets and income
taxes |
25,569 | 3.8 | % | 29,824 | 4.7 | % | ||||||||||
Gain on disposal of assets, net |
345 | 0.1 | % | 104 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||
Earnings from continuing
operations before income taxes |
25,914 | 3.9 | % | 29,928 | 4.8 | % | ||||||||||
Income tax expense |
9,189 | 1.4 | % | 10,591 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||
Net earnings from continuing
operations |
16,725 | 2.5 | % | 19,337 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from
discontinued operations, net of
income taxes |
(3,208 | ) | (0.5 | )% | 46 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
Net earnings |
13,517 | 2.0 | % | 19,383 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||
Net earnings attributable to
non-controlling interests |
(1,771 | ) | (0.3 | ) | (2,028 | ) | (0.3 | ) | ||||||||
Net earnings attributable to
IASIS Healthcare LLC |
$ | 11,746 | 1.7 | % | $ | 17,355 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||
29
Table of Contents
Acute Care
The following table and discussion sets forth, for the periods presented, the results of our
acute care operations expressed in dollar terms and as a percentage of acute care revenue. Such
information has been derived from our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | Amount | Percentage | Amount | Percentage | ||||||||||||
Net revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Acute care revenue |
$ | 471,139 | 99.4 | % | $ | 424,660 | 99.4 | % | ||||||||
Revenue between segments (1) |
2,660 | 0.6 | % | 2,676 | 0.6 | % | ||||||||||
Total acute care revenue |
473,799 | 100.0 | % | 427,336 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
184,890 | 39.0 | % | 165,890 | 38.8 | % | ||||||||||
Supplies |
76,392 | 16.1 | % | 65,362 | 15.3 | % | ||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
90,830 | 19.2 | % | 78,325 | 18.3 | % | ||||||||||
Provision for bad debts |
59,614 | 12.6 | % | 47,949 | 11.2 | % | ||||||||||
Rentals and leases |
10,722 | 2.3 | % | 9,904 | 2.4 | % | ||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
16,877 | 3.5 | % | 16,732 | 3.9 | % | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
23,151 | 4.9 | % | 22,988 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||
Management fees |
1,250 | 0.3 | % | 1,250 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
463,726 | 97.9 | % | 408,400 | 95.6 | % | ||||||||||
Earnings from continuing
operations before gain on
disposal of assets and income
taxes |
10,073 | 2.1 | % | 18,936 | 4.4 | % | ||||||||||
Gain on disposal of assets, net |
345 | 0.1 | % | 104 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||
Earnings from continuing
operations before income taxes |
$ | 10,418 | 2.2 | % | $ | 19,040 | 4.5 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Revenue between segments is eliminated in our consolidated results. |
Acute care revenue Acute care revenue for the quarter ended
December 31, 2010, was $473.8 million, an increase of $46.5 million or 10.9%, compared to $427.3
million in the prior year quarter. The increase in acute care revenue, which includes the impact of
the Brim acquisition, is comprised of an increase in adjusted admissions of 7.7% and an increase in
net patient revenue per adjusted admission of 3.0%.
Net adjustments to estimated third-party payor settlements, also known as prior year
contractuals, resulted in an increase in acute care revenue of $1.4 million and $1.9 million for
the quarters ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Salaries and benefits Salaries and benefits expense for the
quarter ended December 31, 2010, was $184.9 million, or 39.0% of acute care revenue, compared to
$165.9 million, or 38.8% of acute care revenue in the prior year quarter. Included in the current
year quarter is $1.3 million in severance related costs
associated with the transition of our executive management.
Supplies Supplies expense for the quarter ended December 31,
2010, was $76.4 million, or 16.1% of acute care revenue, compared to $65.4 million, or 15.3% of
acute care revenue in the prior year quarter. The increase in supplies as a percentage of acute
care revenue is primarily the result of a shift in the mix of our surgical volume to cases with
more costly implant utilization, particularly in the area of
orthopedics.
30
Table of Contents
Other operating expenses Other operating expenses for the
quarter ended December 31, 2010, were $90.8 million, or 19.2% of acute care revenue, compared to
$78.3 million, or 18.3% of acute care revenue in the prior year quarter. Included in the current
year quarter was $1.7 million in settlement costs related to a
terminated vendor contract for services provided from fiscal years 2006 to 2008. Additionally, other operating expenses as a
percentage of acute care revenue in the current year quarter were
impacted by a 0.3% increase in non-income related taxes and a 0.3%
increase in professional fees associated with the need for additional
on-call specialists coverage.
Provision for bad debts Provision for bad debts for the
quarter ended December 31, 2010, was $59.6 million, or 12.6% of acute care revenue, compared to
$47.9 million, or 11.2% of acute care revenue in the prior year
quarter. The increase in our
provision for bad debts as a percentage of acute care revenue is due to an increase in self-pay
revenue. Additionally, the prior year quarter was impacted by a larger than anticipated increase in the number of
individuals that qualified for coverage under Medicaid or other similar programs.
Health Choice
The following table and discussion sets forth, for the periods presented, the results of our
Health Choice operations expressed in dollar terms and as a percentage of premium revenue. Medical
claims expense represents the amounts paid by Health Choice for healthcare services provided to its
members. Such information has been derived from our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of
operations.
Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | Amount | Percentage | Amount | Percentage | ||||||||||||
Premium revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Premium revenue |
$ | 202,192 | 100.0 | % | $ | 204,297 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
5,023 | 2.5 | % | 4,592 | 2.2 | % | ||||||||||
Supplies |
44 | 0.0 | % | 47 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||
Medical claims (1) |
173,994 | 86.1 | % | 181,243 | 88.7 | % | ||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
6,296 | 3.1 | % | 6,267 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||
Rentals and leases |
444 | 0.2 | % | 371 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
895 | 0.4 | % | 889 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
186,696 | 92.3 | % | 193,409 | 94.7 | % | ||||||||||
Earnings before income taxes |
$ | 15,496 | 7.7 | % | $ | 10,888 | 5.3 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Medical claims paid to our hospitals of $2.7 million for both of the quarters ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, are eliminated in our consolidated results. |
Premium revenue Premium revenue from Health Choice was $202.2 million for the quarter ended
December 31, 2010, a decrease of $2.1 million or 1.0%, compared to $204.3 million in the prior year
quarter. The decrease in premium revenue was the result of slight
decline in premium revenue on a per member per month basis.
Medical claims Prior to eliminations, medical claims expense was $174.0 million for the
quarter ended December 31, 2010, compared to $181.2 million in the prior year quarter. Medical
claims expense as a percentage of premium revenue was 86.1% for the quarter ended December 31,
2010, compared to 88.7% in the prior year quarter. The decrease in medical claims as a percentage
of premium revenue is primarily the result of declining medical claims costs, resulting from a
decrease in general medical utilization, improvements in care management and other operational
initiatives.
31
Table of Contents
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview of Cash Flow Activities for the Quarters Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
Our cash flows are summarized as follows (in thousands):
Quarter | ||||||||
Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
$ | 6,482 | $ | 9,538 | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
(16,725 | ) | (11,592 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
(5,022 | ) | (7,399 | ) |
Operating Activities
Operating cash flows decreased $3.1 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, compared
to the prior year quarter.
At December 31, 2010, we had $181.0 million in net working capital, compared to $134.5 million
at September 30, 2010. Net accounts receivable increased $26.9 million to $236.1 million at
December 31, 2010, from $209.2 million at September 30, 2010. The increase in net working capital and net accounts receivable is primarily the result of the
acquisition of Brim. Our days revenue in accounts receivable at December 31, 2010 were 45, compared
to 43 at September 30, 2010, and 49 at December 31, 2009.
Investing Activities
Capital expenditures for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, were $15.4 million, compared to
$12.3 million in the prior year quarter.
Financing Activities
During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, pursuant to the terms of our senior secured credit
facilities, we made principal payments totaling $1.5 million. Additionally, we paid $462,000 in capital leases
and other long-term debt obligations during the quarter ended December 31, 2010.
Capital Resources
As
of December 31, 2010, we had two separate debt arrangements:
| $854.0 million in senior secured credit facilities; and | ||
| $475.0 million in 8 3/4% senior subordinated notes due 2014. |
$854.0 Million Senior Secured Credit Facilities
The $854.0 million senior secured credit facilities include: (i) a senior secured term loan of
$439.0 million; (ii) a senior secured delayed draw term loan of $150.0 million; (iii) a senior
secured revolving credit facility of $225.0 million, with a $100.0 million sub-limit for letters of
credit; and (iv) a senior secured synthetic letter of credit facility of $40.0 million. All
facilities mature on March 15, 2014, except for the revolving credit facility, which matures on
April 27, 2013. The term loans bear interest at an annual rate of LIBOR plus 2.00% or, at our
option, the administrative agents base rate plus 1.00%. The revolving loans bear interest at an
annual rate of LIBOR plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.25% to 1.75% or, at our option, the
administrative agents base rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.25% to 0.75%, such rate
in each case depending on our senior secured leverage ratio. A commitment fee ranging from 0.375%
to 0.50% per annum is charged on the undrawn portion of the senior secured revolving credit
facility and is payable in arrears.
Principal under the senior secured term loan is due in 24 consecutive equal quarterly
installments in an aggregate annual amount equal to 1.0% of the original principal amount ($439.0
million) during the first six years thereof, with the balance payable in four equal installments in
year seven. Principal under the senior secured delayed draw term
loan is due in equal quarterly installments in an aggregate annual amount equal to 1.0% of the
original principal amount ($150.0 million) until March 31, 2013, with the balance payable in four
equal installments during the final year of the loan. Unless terminated earlier, the senior secured
revolving credit facility has a single maturity of six years. The senior secured credit facilities
are also subject to mandatory prepayment under specific circumstances, including a portion of
excess cash flow, a portion of the net proceeds from an initial public offering, asset sales, debt
issuances and specified casualty events, each subject to various exceptions.
32
Table of Contents
The
senior secured credit facilities are: (i) secured by a first mortgage and lien on our real
property and related personal and intellectual property and pledges of equity interests in the
entities that own such properties; and (ii) guaranteed by certain of our subsidiaries.
In addition, the senior secured credit facilities contain certain covenants which, among other
things, limit the incurrence of additional indebtedness, investments, dividends, transactions with
affiliates, asset sales, acquisitions, mergers and consolidations, liens and encumbrances and other
matters customarily restricted in such agreements. The senior secured credit facilities agreement
contains a customary restricted payments covenant, which, among others restrictions, limits the
amount of dividends or other cash payments to IAS. As of December 31, 2010, we have $201.9 million
available to expend free of any such restrictions pursuant to the restricted payment basket
provisions set forth in this covenant.
At December 31, 2010, amounts outstanding under our senior secured credit facilities consisted
of a $422.5 million term loan and a $146.3 million delayed draw term loan. In addition, we had
$39.9 million and $41.7 million in letters of credit outstanding under the synthetic letter of
credit facility and the revolving credit facility, respectively. The weighted average interest rate
for outstanding borrowings under the senior secured credit facilities
was 3.4% for the quarters ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
$475.0 Million 8 3/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes Due 2014
We and our wholly-owned subsidiary, IASIS Capital Corporation, a holding company with no
assets or operations, as issuers, have outstanding $475.0 million aggregate principal amount of 8
3/4% notes. Our 8 3/
4% notes are general unsecured
senior subordinated obligations of the issuers, are subordinated in right of payment to their
existing and future senior debt, are pari passu in right of payment with any of their future senior
subordinated debt and are senior in right of payment to any of their future subordinated debt. Our
existing domestic subsidiaries, other than certain non-guarantor subsidiaries, which include Health
Choice and our non-wholly owned subsidiaries, are guarantors of our 8 3/4%
notes. Our 8 3/4% notes are effectively subordinated to all of the issuers
and the guarantors secured debt to the extent of the value of the assets securing the debt and are
structurally subordinated to all liabilities and commitments (including trade payables and capital
lease obligations) of our subsidiaries that are not guarantors of our 8 3/4%
notes. Our 8 3/4% notes require semi-annual interest payments in June and
December. The indenture related to the 8 3/4% notes contains a customary
restricted payments covenant, which, among others restrictions, limits the amount of dividends or
other cash payments to IAS, including payments to fund the interest on the Holdings Senior
Paid-in-Kind (PIK) Loans, which becomes cash pay in June 2012. As of December 31, 2010, we have
$114.9 million available to expend free of any such restrictions pursuant to the restricted payment
basket provisions set forth in this covenant.
Holdings Senior PIK Loans
IAS has outstanding Senior PIK Loans, which mature June 15, 2014. Proceeds were used
to repurchase certain preferred equity from the stockholders of IAS. The Holdings Senior PIK Loans
bear interest at an annual rate equal to LIBOR plus 5.25%. The Holdings Senior PIK Loans rank
behind our existing debt and will convert to cash-pay in June 2012, at which time all accrued
interest becomes payable. At December 31, 2010, the outstanding balance of the Holdings Senior PIK
Loans was $395.4 million, which includes $95.4 million of interest that has accrued to the
principal of these loans since the date of issuance, and is recorded in the financial statements of
IAS. The credit agreement related to the Holdings Senior PIK Loans includes a restricted payment
covenant, which, among other restrictions, limits the amount of dividends that can be paid to the
stockholders of IAS. As of December 31, 2010, we have $54.9 million available to expend free of any
such restrictions pursuant to the restricted payment basket provisions set forth in this covenant.
33
Table of Contents
Other
We are a party to interest rate swap agreements with Citibank, N.A. (Citibank) and Wachovia
Bank, N.A. (Wachovia), as counterparties, with notional amounts totaling $425.0 million, in an
effort to manage exposure to floating interest rate risk on a portion of our variable rate debt.
The arrangements with each counterparty include two interest rate swap agreements, one with a
notional amount of $112.5 million maturing on February 28, 2011, and one with a notional amount of
$100.0 million maturing on February 29, 2012. Under these agreements, we are required to make
monthly interest payments to our counterparties at fixed annual interest rates ranging from 1.5% to
2.0%, depending upon the agreement. Our counterparties are obligated to make monthly interest
payments to us based upon the one-month LIBOR rate in effect over the term of each agreement.
As of December 31, 2010, we provided a performance guaranty in the form of letters of credit
totaling $48.3 million for the benefit of AHCCCS to support our obligations under the Health Choice
contract to provide and pay for healthcare services. The amount of the performance guaranty is
based in part upon the membership in the Plan and the related capitation revenue paid to us.
Capital Expenditures
We plan to finance our proposed capital expenditures with cash generated from operations,
borrowings under our senior secured credit facilities and other capital sources that may become
available. We expect our capital expenditures for fiscal 2011 to be $120.0 million to $130.0
million, including the following significant expenditures:
| $50.0 million to $55.0 million for growth and new business projects; | ||
| $40.0 million to $45.0 million in replacement or maintenance related projects at our hospitals; | ||
| $12.0 million related to our newly acquired facilities; and | ||
| $18.0 million in hardware and software costs related to information systems projects, including healthcare IT stimulus initiatives. |
Liquidity
We rely on cash generated from our internal operations as our primary source of liquidity, as
well as available credit facilities, bank financings and the issuance of long-term
debt. From time to time, we have also utilized operating lease transactions that are sometimes
referred to as off-balance sheet arrangements. We expect that our future funding for working
capital needs, capital expenditures, long-term debt repayments and other financing activities will
continue to be provided from some or all of these sources. Each of our existing and projected
sources of cash is impacted by operational and financial risks that influence the overall amount of
cash generated and the capital available to us. For example, cash generated by our business
operations may be impacted by, among other things, economic downturns, weather-related catastrophes
and adverse industry conditions. Our future liquidity will be impacted by our ability to access
capital markets, which may be restricted due to our credit ratings, general market conditions, by
existing or future debt agreements, and by potential transactions determined by our private equity
sponsors that, in their judgment, could enhance their equity investment, even though such
transactions might reduce our cash flows or capital reserves. For a further discussion of risks
that can impact our liquidity, see our risk factors beginning on page 35 of our Annual Report of
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.
Including available cash and our senior secured credit facilities at December 31, 2010, we had
available liquidity as follows (in millions):
Available cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 129.2 | ||
Available capacity under our senior secured revolving credit facility |
183.3 | |||
Net available liquidity at December 31, 2010 |
$ | 312.5 | ||
Net available liquidity assumes 100% participation from all lenders currently participating in
our senior secured revolving credit facility. In addition to our available liquidity, we expect to
generate significant operating cash flows
in fiscal 2011. We will also utilize proceeds from our financing activities as needed.
34
Table of Contents
Based upon our current level of operations and anticipated growth, we believe we have
sufficient liquidity to meet our cash requirements over the short-term (next 12 months) and over
the next three years. In evaluating the sufficiency of our liquidity for both the short-term and
long-term, we considered the expected cash flow to be generated by our operations, cash on hand and
the available borrowings under our senior secured credit facilities, compared to our anticipated
cash requirements for debt service, working capital, capital expenditures and the payment of taxes,
as well as funding requirements for long-term liabilities.
As a result of this evaluation, we believe that we will have sufficient liquidity for the next
three years to fund the cash required for the payment of taxes and the capital expenditures
required to maintain our facilities during this period of time. We are unable at this time to
extend our evaluation of the sufficiency of our liquidity beyond three years. We cannot assure you,
however, that our operating performance will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that
future borrowings will be available under our senior secured credit facilities, or otherwise, to
enable us to grow our business, service our indebtedness, including the senior secured credit
facilities and the
8 3/4% senior subordinated notes, or make anticipated capital
expenditures. For more information, see our risk factors beginning on page 35 of our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.
One element of our business strategy is to selectively pursue acquisitions and strategic
alliances in existing and new markets. Any acquisitions or strategic alliances may result in the
incurrence of, or assumption by us, of additional indebtedness. We continually assess our capital
needs and may seek additional financing, including debt or equity as considered necessary to fund
capital expenditures and potential acquisitions or for other corporate purposes. Our future
operating performance, ability to service or refinance our 8 3/4% senior
subordinated notes and ability to service and extend or refinance our senior secured credit
facilities will be subject to future economic conditions and to financial, business and other
factors, many of which are beyond our control. For more information, see our risk factors beginning
on page 35 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.
SEASONALITY
The patient volumes and acute care revenue of our healthcare operations are subject to
seasonal variations and generally are greater during the quarter ended March 31 than other
quarters. These seasonal variations are caused by a number of factors, including seasonal cycles of
illness, climate and weather conditions in our markets, vacation patterns of both patients and
physicians and other factors relating to the timing of elective procedures.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In August 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU No. 2010-23, Health Care
Entities (Topic 954): Measuring Charity Care for Disclosure. Due to the lack of comparability
existing due to the use of either revenue or cost as the basis for disclosure of charity care, this
ASU standardizes cost as the basis for charity care disclosures and specifies the elements of cost
to be used in charity care disclosures. ASU 2010-23 is effective for our fiscal year beginning
October 1, 2011 and is not expected to significantly impact our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are subject to market risk from exposure to changes in interest rates based on our
financing, investing, and cash management activities. The following components of our senior
secured credit facilities bear interest at variable rates at specified margins above either the
agent banks alternate base rate or the LIBOR rate: (i) a $439.0 million, seven-year term loan;
(ii) a $150.0 million senior secured delayed draw term loan; and (iii) a $225.0 million, six-year
senior secured revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2010, we had outstanding variable rate
debt of $568.8 million. We have managed our market exposure to changes in interest rates by
converting $425.0 million of this variable rate debt to fixed rate debt through the use of interest
rate swap agreements. Our interest rate swaps provide for $425.0 million of fixed rate debt under
our senior secured credit facilities through February 28, 2011 and $200.0 million from March 1,
2011 through February 29, 2012, at rates ranging from 1.5% to 2.0% depending upon the terms of the
specific agreement.
35
Table of Contents
Although changes in the alternate base rate or the LIBOR rate would affect the cost of funds
borrowed in the future, we believe the effect, if any, of reasonably possible near-term changes in
interest rates on our remaining variable rate debt or our consolidated financial position, results
of operations or cash flows would not be material. Holding other variables constant, including
levels of indebtedness and interest rate swaps, a 0.125% increase in interest rates would have an
estimated impact on pre-tax earnings and cash flows for the next
twelve month period of $461,000.
Our interest rate swap agreements expose us to credit risk in the event of non-performance by
our counterparties, Citibank and Wachovia. However, we do not anticipate non-performance by these
counterparties.
We have $475.0 million in senior subordinated notes due December 15, 2014, with interest
payable semi-annually at the rate of 8 3/4%
per annum. At December 31, 2010,
the fair market value of the outstanding 8 3/4% notes was $485.7 million,
based upon quoted market prices as of that date.
We currently believe we have adequate liquidity to fund operations during the near term
through the generation of operating cash flows, cash on hand and access to our revolving credit
facility. Our ability to borrow funds under our revolving credit facility is subject to the
financial viability of the participating financial institutions. While we do not anticipate any of
our current lenders defaulting on their obligations, we are unable to provide assurance that any
particular lender will not default at a future date.
36
Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluations of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management team, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of
December 31, 2010. Based on this
evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal accounting officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information
required to be included in our periodic reports.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the period covered by this report, there has been no change in our internal control
over financial reporting that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect
our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On March 31, 2008, the United States District Court for the District of Arizona (District
Court) dismissed with prejudice the qui tam complaint against IAS, our parent company. The qui tam
action sought monetary damages and civil penalties under the federal False Claims Act (FCA) and
included allegations that certain business practices related to physician relationships and the
medical necessity of certain procedures resulted in the submission of claims for reimbursement in
violation of the FCA. The case dates back to March 2005 and became the subject of a subpoena by the
Office of Inspector General in September 2005. In August 2007, the case was unsealed and
the U.S. Department of Justice declined to intervene. The District Court dismissed the case from
the bench at the conclusion of oral arguments on IAS motion to dismiss. On April 21, 2008, the
District Court issued a written order dismissing the case with prejudice and entering formal
judgment for IAS and denying as moot IAS motions related to the relators misappropriation of
information subject to a claim of attorney-client privilege by IAS. Both parties appealed. On
August 12, 2010, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the District Courts
dismissal of the qui tam complaint and the District Courts denial of IAS motions concerning
the relators misappropriation of documents and ordered that the qui tam relator be allowed leave to
file a Third Amended Complaint and for the District Court to consider IAS motions concerning
the relators misappropriation of documents. The District Court ordered the qui tam relator to file his
Third Amended Complaint by November 22, 2010, and set a schedule for the filing of motions related
to the relators misappropriation of documents. On October 20, 2010, the qui tam relator filed a
motion to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Texas. That motion remains pending. On November 22, 2010, the relator filed his Third Amended
Complaint. On January 3, 2011, IAS filed its renewed motion for sanctions concerning the relators
misappropriation of documents and, on January 14, 2011, IAS
filed its motion to dismiss the relators
Third Amended Complaint. The relators brief in opposition to IAS motion to dismiss is due February
18, 2011 and IAS reply brief is due March 14, 2011. If the qui tam action was to be resolved in a
manner unfavorable to IAS, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations, including exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs.
In addition, we may incur material fees, costs and expenses in connection with defending the qui
tam action.
37
Table of Contents
Our facilities obtain clinical and administrative services from a variety of vendors. One
vendor, a medical practice that furnished cardiac catheterization services under contractual
arrangements at Mesa General Hospital and St. Lukes Medical Center through March 31, 2008 and May
31, 2008, respectively, has asserted that, because of deferred fee adjustments that it claims are
due under these arrangements, it is owed additional amounts for services rendered since April 1,
2006 at both facilities. We were unable to reach an agreement with the vendor with respect to the
amount of the fee adjustment, if any, that was contractually required, nor with respect to an
appropriate methodology for determining such amount. On September 30, 2008, the vendor filed a
state court complaint for an aggregate adjustment in excess of the
amount we had accrued, in addition to certain tort claims. On March 20, 2009, we filed a Motion to
Dismiss and in the alternative to Compel Arbitration. On July 27, 2009, the court granted our
Motion to Compel Arbitration on the grounds that the issues are to be determined by
binding arbitration. On December 24, 2010, after conducting the arbitration hearing, the
arbitration panel issued its decision rejecting the fees sought by the vendor, but did not adopt
the fees proposed by us. The arbitration panel required both parties to agree upon a settlement
amount, based on the arbitration panels approved methodology, by January 21, 2011. We have
reviewed the methodology required by decision in binding arbitration and determined it will result
in a payment to the vendor of approximately $9.4 million. Of the additional liability resulting
from the arbitration panels decision, $4.8 million ($3.0 million, net of income taxes) is included
in discontinued operations related to the closure of Mesa General Hospital for the quarter ended
December 31, 2010. The arbitration panel has not rendered a decision with respect to the vendors
claims for prejudgment interest, the parties respective claims for fees and costs, nor with
respect to any of vendors tort claims, which are expected to be addressed in separate proceedings.
We will continue to defend our interests in connection with this arbitration proceeding but
expresses no opinion as to the outcome of matters not yet decided by the arbitration panel.
In
November 2010, the Department of Justice (DOJ) sent a letter to IAS requesting a 12-month tolling agreement in
connection with an investigation into Medicare claims submitted by our hospitals in connection with
the implantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) during the period 2003 to the
present. At that time, neither the precise number of procedures, number of claims nor the hospitals
involved were identified by the DOJ. We understand that the government is conducting a national
initiative with respect to ICD procedures involving a number of healthcare providers and is seeking
information in order to determine if ICD implantation procedures were performed in accordance with
Medicare coverage requirements. On January 11, 2011, IAS entered into the tolling agreement with
the DOJ and, subsequently, the DOJ has provided IAS with a list of 194 procedures involving ICDs at
14 hospitals which are the subject of further medical necessity review by the DOJ. We are
cooperating fully with the government and, to date, the DOJ has not asserted any claim against our
hospitals.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Reference is made to the factors set forth under the caption Forward-Looking Statements in
Part I, Item 2 of this Form 10-Q and other risk factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2010, which are incorporated herein by reference. There have not
been any material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010.
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) List of Exhibits:
10.1 | Agreement,
dated December 20, 2010 and effective October 31, 2010, by and
between IASIS Healthcare Corporation and David R. White, incorporated
by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
December 23, 2010. |
|||
31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule
15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|||
31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
38
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
IASIS HEALTHCARE LLC |
||||
Date: February 14, 2011 | By: | /s/ John M. Doyle | ||
John M. Doyle | ||||
Chief Financial Officer |
39
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
10.1 | Agreement,
dated December 20, 2010 and effective October 31, 2010, by and
between IASIS Healthcare Corporation and David R. White, incorporated
by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
December 23, 2010. |
|||
31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|||
31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
40