Attached files

file filename
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER - hhgregg, Inc.dex312.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER - hhgregg, Inc.dex311.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER - hhgregg, Inc.dex321.htm
EX-32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER - hhgregg, Inc.dex322.htm
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
  EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
  EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number 001-33600

 

 

LOGO

hhgregg, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware   20-8819207

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

4151 East 96th Street

Indianapolis, IN

  46240
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

(317) 848-8710

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer   ¨    Accelerated Filer   x
Non-accelerated filer   ¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No

The number of shares of hhgregg, Inc.’s common stock outstanding as of February 3, 2011 was 39,706,237.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

HHGREGG, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Report on Form 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2010

 

     Page  
Part I. Financial Information   
   Item 1.    Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited):   
     

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009

     3   
     

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010

     4   
     

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009

     5   
     

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010

     6   
      Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements      7   
   Item 2.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations      14   
   Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk      22   
   Item 4.    Controls and Procedures      22   
Part II. Other Information   
   Item 1.    Legal Proceedings      23   
   Item 1A.    Risk Factors      23   
   Item 6.    Exhibits      23   

Signatures

     24   

 

2


Table of Contents

Part I. Financial Information

 

ITEM 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

HHGREGG, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

(Unaudited)

 

     Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
     December 31,
2010
    December 31,
2009
    December 31,
2010
    December 31,
2009
 
     (In thousands, except share and per share data)  

Net sales

   $ 653,731      $ 500,392      $ 1,570,632      $ 1,116,960   

Cost of goods sold

     460,190        347,888        1,100,371        777,461   
                                

Gross profit

     193,541        152,504        470,261        339,499   

Selling, general and administrative expenses

     118,110        92,715        325,159        233,326   

Net advertising expense

     22,939        17,189        66,795        42,477   

Depreciation and amortization expense

     6,944        4,345        19,337        12,324   
                                

Income from operations

     45,548        38,255        58,970        51,372   

Other expense (income):

        

Interest expense

     1,288        1,317        3,739        3,972   

Interest income

     (5     (4     (19     (18
                                

Total other expense

     1,283        1,313        3,720        3,954   
                                

Income before income taxes

     44,265        36,942        55,250        47,418   

Income tax expense

     17,352        14,207        21,677        18,267   
                                

Net income

   $ 26,913      $ 22,735      $ 33,573      $ 29,151   
                                

Net income per share

        

Basic

   $ 0.68      $ 0.59      $ 0.85      $ 0.81   

Diluted

   $ 0.66      $ 0.57      $ 0.83      $ 0.78   

Weighted average shares outstanding-Basic

     39,583,521        38,393,715        39,289,391        36,056,798   

Weighted average shares outstanding-Diluted

     40,495,966        39,736,739        40,380,370        37,350,450   

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

HHGREGG, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

 

     December 31,
2010
    March 31,
2010
 
     (In thousands, except share data)  

Assets

    

Current assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 71,536      $ 157,837   

Accounts receivable—trade, less allowances of $193 and $177, respectively

     16,093        7,312   

Accounts receivable—other

     29,649        23,411   

Merchandise inventories, net

     363,515        201,503   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     3,439        7,905   

Income tax receivable

     3,840        624   

Deferred income taxes

     8,173        6,155   
                

Total current assets

     496,245        404,747   
                

Net property and equipment

     154,187        133,013   

Deferred financing costs, net

     2,292        3,196   

Deferred income taxes

     53,499        64,096   

Other assets

     1,015        867   
                

Total long-term assets

     210,993        201,172   
                

Total assets

   $ 707,238      $ 605,919   
                

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

    

Current liabilities:

    

Accounts payable

   $ 176,387      $ 149,414   

Current maturities of long-term debt

     908        908   

Customer deposits

     23,719        20,330   

Accrued liabilities

     56,805        44,846   
                

Total current liabilities

     257,819        215,498   
                

Long-term liabilities:

    

Long-term debt, excluding current maturities

     86,752        87,433   

Other long-term liabilities

     63,320        49,580   
                

Total long-term liabilities

     150,072        137,013   
                

Total liabilities

     407,891        352,511   
                

Stockholders’ equity:

    

Preferred stock, par value $.0001; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, respectively

     —          —     

Common stock, par value $.0001; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 39,702,904 and 38,517,388 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, respectively

     4        4   

Additional paid-in capital

     266,814        254,770   

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

     (703     (982

Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)

     33,273        (300
                
     299,388        253,492   

Note receivable for common stock

     (41     (84
                

Total stockholders’ equity

     299,347        253,408   
                

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 707,238      $ 605,919   
                

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

HHGREGG, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

 

     Nine Months Ended  
     December 31,
2010
    December 31,
2009
 
     (In thousands)  

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net income

   $ 33,573      $ 29,151   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

     19,337        12,324   

Amortization of deferred financing costs

     904        690   

Stock-based compensation

     3,934        2,643   

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation

     (14,484     (2,460

(Gain) loss on sales of property and equipment

     (297     12   

Deferred income taxes

     8,396        9,656   

Tenant allowances received from landlords

     14,421        6,334   

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

    

Accounts receivable—trade

     (8,781     (1,417

Accounts receivable—other

     (6,238     (4,676

Merchandise inventories

     (162,012     (75,766

Income tax receivable

     11,268        —     

Prepaid expenses and other assets

     4,318        (387

Accounts payable

     36,898        5,889   

Customer deposits

     3,389        2,117   

Accrued liabilities

     11,959        18,508   

Other long-term liabilities

     (26     (1,222
                

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

     (43,441     1,396   
                

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Purchases of property and equipment

     (49,006     (34,160

Net proceeds from sale leaseback transactions

     —          4,694   

Deposit on future sale leaseback transactions applied

     —          (1,043

Proceeds from sales of property and equipment

     120        43   
                

Net cash used in investing activities

     (48,886     (30,466
                

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

     —          82,913   

Transaction costs for stock issuance

     —          (4,764

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

     4,748        3,725   

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation

     14,484        2,460   

Net settlement of shares - payment of witholding tax

     (11,122     —     

Net (decrease) increase in bank overdrafts

     (1,446     25,191   

Payments on notes payable

     (681     (682

Transaction costs for amending ABL Facility

     —          (1,640

Other, net

     43        38   
                

Net cash provided by financing activities

     6,026        107,241   
                

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

     (86,301     78,171   

Cash and cash equivalents

    

Beginning of period

     157,837        21,496   
                

End of period

   $ 71,536      $ 99,667   
                

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

    

Interest paid

   $ 2,710      $ 3,411   

Income taxes paid

   $ 1,653      $ 2,529   

Capital expenditures included in accounts payable

   $ 1,914      $ 7,778   

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

HHGREGG, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income

Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010

(in thousands)

 

     Preferred
Stock
     Common
Stock
     Additional
Paid in
Capital
    Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Loss
    Retained Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)
    Note Receivable
For Common
Stock
    Total
Stockholders’
Equity
 

Balance at March 31, 2010

   $ —         $ 4       $ 254,770      $ (982   $ (300   $ (84   $ 253,408   

Comprehensive income:

                

Net income

               33,573          33,573   

Unrealized gain on hedge arrangement, net of tax expense of $183

             279            279   
                      

Total comprehensive income

                   33,852   

Payments received on notes receivable for issuance of common stock

     —           —           —          —          —          43        43   

Exercise of stock options

     —           —           4,748        —          —          —          4,748   

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation

     —           —           14,484        —          —          —          14,484   

Net settlement of shares - taxes

     —           —           (11,122     —          —          —          (11,122

Stock-based compensation expense

     —           —           3,934        —          —          —          3,934   
                                                          

Balance at December 31, 2010

   $ —         $ 4       $ 266,814      $ (703   $ 33,273      $ (41   $ 299,347   
                                                          

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

6


Table of Contents

HHGREGG, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Description of Business

hhgregg, Inc. (the “Company” or “hhgregg”) is a specialty retailer of consumer electronics, home appliances and related services operating under the name hhgreggTM. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had 173 stores located in Alabama, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia. The Company operates in one reportable segment.

Interim Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In the opinion of the Company’s management, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all necessary adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, for a fair presentation of such data. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such SEC rules and regulations. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of hhgregg, Inc. and the notes thereto for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on May 27, 2010. The consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of those to be expected for a full year. Further, the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the assets and liabilities and the reporting of sales and expenses to prepare these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of hhgregg and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Gregg Appliances, Inc. (“Gregg Appliances”). Gregg Appliances has a wholly-owned subsidiary, HHG Distributing LLC (“HHG Distributing”), which has no assets or operations.

(2) Fair Value Measurements

Fair value measurements are determined based on the exit price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants exclusive of transaction costs. The Company uses a three-tier valuation hierarchy based upon observable and non-observable inputs:

Level 1 – unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access.

Level 2 – inputs other than quoted market prices included in Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

Level 3 – unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, as there is little, if any, market activity at the measurement date.

Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The fair value hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. In instances in which the inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the fair value measurement has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular item to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, including the consideration of inputs specific to the asset or liability.

 

7


Table of Contents

HHGREGG, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Company’s financial liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):

 

            Fair Value as of  
     Level      December 31,
2010
    March 31,
2010
 

Financial instruments classified as liabilities

       

Interest rate swap

     2       $ (1,168   $ (1,630

No transfers between the levels within the fair value hierarchy occurred during the nine months ended December 31, 2010. The fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap was determined based on LIBOR yield curves at the reporting date.

Assets and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

During the three and nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, the Company had no measurements of assets or liabilities at fair value on a non-recurring basis, such as property and equipment, subsequent to their initial recognition.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable—trade, accounts receivable—other, accounts payable and customer deposits approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. The carrying amount of the Company’s senior credit agreement (the “Term B Facility”) approximates fair value as the interest rate is market based.

(3) Derivative Instruments

The Company only enters into derivative contracts that it intends to designate as a hedge of a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (cash flow hedge). For all hedging relationships, the Company formally documents the hedging relationship and its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge, the hedging instrument, the hedged item, the nature of the risk being hedged, how the hedging instrument’s effectiveness in offsetting the hedged risk will be assessed prospectively and retrospectively, and a description of the method of measuring ineffectiveness. The Company also formally assesses, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting cash flows of hedged items.

Cash Flow Hedges

The Company uses variable-rate debt to finance its operations. The debt obligations expose the Company to variability in interest payments due to changes in interest rates. Management believes that it is prudent to limit the variability of a portion of its interest payments. To meet this objective, management enters into interest rate swap agreements to manage fluctuations in cash flows resulting from changes in the benchmark interest rate of LIBOR. These swaps change the variable-rate cash flow exposure on the debt obligations to fixed cash flows. Under the terms of the interest rate swaps, the Company receives LIBOR based variable interest rate payments and makes fixed interest rate payments, thereby creating the equivalent of fixed-rate debt for the notional amount of its debt that is hedged. The Company entered into an interest-rate related derivative instrument to manage its exposure on $50 million of its Term B Facility during fiscal 2008. This derivative instrument expired in October 2009, and upon its expiration the Company entered into another derivative instrument to manage its exposure on $75 million of its Term B Facility. This derivative instrument became effective in October 2009 and expires in October 2011.

Changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps designated as hedging instruments that effectively offset the variability of cash flows associated with variable-rate, long-term debt obligations are reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss. These amounts subsequently are reclassified into interest expense as a yield adjustment of the hedged

 

8


Table of Contents

HHGREGG, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

interest payments in the same period in which the related interest affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of a derivative instrument that qualifies as a cash-flow hedge is reported currently in earnings.

Summary of Derivative Balances

The following table presents the gross fair values of derivative instruments and the corresponding classification in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010 (in thousands):

 

Contract Type

   Balance  Sheet
Classification
   Fair Value as of  
      December 31, 2010     March 31, 2010  

Cash flow hedge

   Accrued liabilities    $ (1,168   $ —     

Cash flow hedge

   Other long-term liabilities      —          (1,630

For the three and nine months ended December 31, 2010, the hedges were considered effective and $0.4 million and $1.1 million, respectively, were recorded into interest expense for recognized losses on the cash flow hedges. Within the next year, the Company expects to reclassify into earnings approximately $1.2 million of losses from the current balance held in accumulated other comprehensive loss. There were no cash flow hedges discontinued prior to their original maturity date in the nine months ended December 31, 2010 or 2009.

As a result of the use of derivative instruments, the Company is exposed to risk that the counterparties will fail to meet their contractual obligations. Recent adverse developments in the global financial and credit markets could negatively impact the creditworthiness of the Company’s counterparties and cause one or more of the Company’s counterparties to fail to perform as expected. To mitigate the counterparty credit risk, the Company only enters into contracts with carefully selected major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors, and continually assesses the creditworthiness of counterparties. To date, all counterparties have performed in accordance with their contractual obligations.

(4) Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following at December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010 (in thousands):

 

     December 31,
2010
    March 31,
2010
 

Machinery and equipment

     18,660        15,100   

Office furniture and equipment

     116,679        96,323   

Vehicles

     3,398        4,715   

Signs

     13,041        9,128   

Leasehold improvements

     99,169        62,848   

Construction in progress

     9,935        34,626   
                
     260,882        222,740   

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

     (106,695     (89,727
                

Net property and equipment

   $ 154,187      $ 133,013   
                

(5) Net Income per Share

Net income per basic share is calculated based on the weighted-average number of outstanding common shares. Net income per diluted share is calculated based on the weighted-average number of outstanding common shares plus the

 

9


Table of Contents

HHGREGG, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

effect of potential dilutive common shares. When the Company reports net income, the calculation of net income per diluted share excludes shares underlying outstanding stock options with exercise prices that exceed the average market price of the Company’s common stock for the period and certain options with unrecognized compensation cost, as the effect would be antidilutive. Potential dilutive common shares are composed of shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options. The following table presents net income per basic and diluted share for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):

 

     Three Months Ended      Nine Months Ended  
     December 31,
2010
     December 31,
2009
     December 31,
2010
     December 31,
2009
 

Net income (A)

   $ 26,913       $ 22,735       $ 33,573       $ 29,151   

Weighted average outstanding shares of common stock (B)

     39,583,521         38,393,715         39,289,391         36,056,798   

Dilutive effect of employee stock options

     912,445         1,343,024         1,090,979         1,293,652   
                                   

Common stock and potential dilutive common shares (C)

     40,495,966         39,736,739         40,380,370         37,350,450   

Net income per share:

           

Basic (A/B)

   $ 0.68       $ 0.59       $ 0.85       $ 0.81   

Diluted (A/C)

   $ 0.66       $ 0.57       $ 0.83       $ 0.78   

Antidilutive shares not included in the net income per diluted share calculation for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were 802,500 and 737,000, respectively. Antidilutive shares not included in the net income per diluted share calculation for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were 802,500 and 737,000, respectively.

(6) Inventories

Net merchandise inventories consisted of the following at December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010 (in thousands):

 

     December 31,
2010
     March 31,
2010
 

Video

   $ 198,105       $ 93,520   

Appliances

     92,458         55,244   

Other

     72,952         52,739   
                 
   $ 363,515       $ 201,503   
                 

(7) Debt

A summary of debt at December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010 is as follows (in thousands):

 

     December 31,
2010
     March 31,
2010
 

Senior secured Term B Facility maturing on July 25, 2013

   $ 87,660       $ 88,341   

Less current maturities of long-term debt

     908         908   
                 

Total long-term debt

   $ 86,752       $ 87,433   
                 

On July 25, 2007, Gregg Appliances entered into the Term B Facility with a bank group obtaining a $100 million senior secured term loan B maturing on July 25, 2013. Interest on the borrowings fluctuates and is payable in defined periods, currently monthly, depending on Gregg Appliances’ election of the bank’s prime rate or LIBOR plus an applicable margin, which is currently 200 basis points. The weighted average interest rate on the term loan as of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010 was 2.3% and 2.5%, respectively. The Company entered into an interest rate related derivative on $75 million of the Term B Facility which adjusts the effective weighted average interest rate on the Term B Facility at December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010 to 3.9%. See discussion at Note 3.

 

10


Table of Contents

HHGREGG, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

The Term B Facility contains customary representations and warranties and customary affirmative and negative covenants, including, among other things, restrictions on incurrence of additional debt, liens, dividends and other restricted payments, asset sales, investments, mergers and acquisitions and affiliate transactions. The only financial covenant included in the Term B Facility is a maximum leverage ratio. Events of default under the Term B Facility include, among others, nonpayment of principal or interest, covenant defaults, material breaches of representations and warranties, bankruptcy and insolvency events, cross defaults and a change of control. Gregg Appliances was in compliance with the restrictions and covenants in the Term B Facility at December 31, 2010.

On July 25, 2007, Gregg Appliances entered into an Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (“Revolving Credit Facility”) with a bank group for up to $100 million. On September 15, 2009, Gregg Appliances entered into Amendment No. 1 and Joinder to the Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (“Amendment No. 1”) with a bank group, which amended the Revolving Credit Facility. Amendment No. 1 increased the maximum amount available under the Revolving Credit Facility from $100 million to $125 million, subject to borrowing base availability. Under the Revolving Credit Facility, as amended by Amendment No. 1, borrowings from time to time shall not exceed a defined borrowing base. Interest on borrowings is payable monthly at a fluctuating rate based on the bank’s prime rate or LIBOR plus an applicable margin. The annual commitment fee is 0.25% on the unused portion of the facility and 1.25% for outstanding letters of credit. The Revolving Credit Facility is guaranteed by Gregg Appliances’ wholly-owned subsidiary, HHG Distributing LLC (“HHG”), which has no assets or operations. The guarantee is full and unconditional and Gregg Appliances has no other subsidiaries. In addition, there are no restrictions on HHG’s ability to pay dividends under the arrangement. Gregg Appliances was in compliance with the restrictions and covenants in the Revolving Credit Facility at December 31, 2010.

Pursuant to Amendment No. 1, the borrowing base was modified to equal the sum of (i) the lesser of (a) 90% of the net orderly liquidation value of all eligible inventory of Gregg Appliances and (b) 75% of the net book value of such eligible inventory and (ii) 90% of all commercial and credit card receivables of Gregg Appliances, in each case subject to customary reserves and eligibility criteria. Prior to Amendment No. 1, the borrowing base equaled the sum of (i) the lesser of (a) 93% (96% during a seasonal period) of the net orderly liquidation value of all eligible inventory of Gregg Appliances and (b) 75% of the net book value of such eligible inventory and (ii) 90% of all commercial and credit card receivables of Gregg Appliances, in each case subject to customary reserves and eligibility criteria. Amendment No. 1 required payment to the incremental lenders of a commitment fee equal to 5.0% of the incremental commitment, or $1,250,000.

Under the Revolving Credit Facility, as amended by Amendment No. 1, Gregg Appliances is not required to comply with any financial maintenance covenant unless it has less than $18.75 million of “excess availability” at any time, during the continuance of which event Gregg Appliances is subject to compliance with a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.10 to 1.0. Amendment No. 1 allows up to $5.0 million of additional availability to be included in the total of “excess availability” for the months of October and November.

Amendment No. 1 also modifies the trigger point for the initiation of cash dominion control. Prior to Amendment No. 1, if Gregg Appliances had less than $8.5 million of “excess availability”, it would, in certain circumstances, become subject to cash dominion control. Pursuant to the Amendment No. 1, if Gregg Appliances has less than $18.75 million of “excess availability,” it may, in certain circumstances more specifically described in the Revolving Credit Facility, as amended by Amendment No. 1, become subject to cash dominion control.

As of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, under the Revolving Credit Facility, the Company had no cash borrowings outstanding and had $4.8 million of letters of credit outstanding, which expire through December 31, 2011. As of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, the total borrowing availability under the Revolving Credit Facility was $120.2 million and $117.5 million, respectively. The interest rate based on the bank’s prime rate as of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010 was 3.0%.

 

11


Table of Contents

HHGREGG, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

(8) Stock-based Compensation

The following table summarizes the activity under the Company’s Stock Option Plans for the nine months ended December 31, 2010:

 

     Number of Options
Outstanding
    Weighted Average
Exercise  Price
per Share
 

Outstanding at March 31, 2010

     4,549,217      $ 9.68   

Granted

     794,500        28.06   

Exercised

     (1,897,652     7.30   

Canceled

     (33,164     19.93   
                

Outstanding at December 31, 2010

     3,412,901      $ 15.19   
                

During the nine months ended December 31, 2010, the Company granted options for 794,500 shares of common stock under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan to certain employees and directors of the Company. The options vest in equal amounts over a three-year period beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant and expire seven years from the date of the grant. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

The weighted-average estimated fair value of options granted to employees and directors under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan was $11.17 during the nine months ended December 31, 2010, using the Black-Scholes model with the following weighted average assumptions:

 

Risk-free interest rate

   1.30% -1.95%

Dividend yield

   —  

Expected volatility

   45.5%

Expected life of the options (years)

   4.5

Forfeitures

   2.00%

Of the 1,897,652 options exercised during the nine months ended December 31, 2010, 712,136 relate to options with an aggregate value of $20.2 million used by certain employees in connection with the net settlement exercise of 1,324,000 stock options held by these employees during the second quarter of fiscal 2011. The 712,136 options were used to satisfy the employees’ exercise price and minimum statutory tax withholding requirements. During the nine months ended December 31, 2010, 1,185,516 shares were issued in connection with the exercise of stock options.

 

12


Table of Contents

HHGREGG, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

(9) Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income is computed as net income plus certain other items that are recorded directly to stockholders’ equity. In addition to net income, comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 includes the changes in fair value of the Company’s interest rate swaps, net of tax. Comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 is calculated as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  

(in thousands)

   December 31,
2010
    December 31,
2009
    December 31,
2010
    December 31,
2009
 

Net income, as reported

   $ 26,913      $ 22,735      $ 33,573      $ 29,151   

Reclassification adjustment for loss reclassified into interest expense, net of tax

     225        231        660        864   

Unrealized gain on hedge arrangements, net of tax

     (9     (123     (381     (927
                                

Comprehensive income

   $ 27,129      $ 22,843      $ 33,852      $ 29,088   
                                

(10) Stockholders’ Equity

The Company filed a universal shelf registration statement which was declared effective on July 14, 2009, registering $200 million principal amount of its securities which may be sold by hhgregg under such registration statement at any time. Each of Gregg Appliances and HHG Distributing were additional registrants to the shelf registration statement because each may guaranty any debt securities that are issued by hhgregg under the shelf registration statement. Gregg Appliances and HHG Distributing are exempt from reporting under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), pursuant to Rule 12h-5 under the Exchange Act as: (i) hhgregg has no independent assets or operations; (ii) any guarantees of the subsidiary guarantors of debt securities issued under the shelf registration statement are full and unconditional and joint and several: and (iii) there are no subsidiaries of hhgregg other than Gregg Appliances and HHG Distributing. Gregg Appliances is the borrower under the Term B Facility. The Term B Facility contains restrictions on the payment of dividends and other transfer of assets to hhgregg.

 

13


Table of Contents
ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is designed to provide a reader of our financial statements with a narrative from the perspective of our management on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and certain other factors that may affect our future results. Our MD&A is presented in five sections:

 

   

Overview

 

   

Critical Accounting Polices

 

   

Results of Operations

 

   

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

   

Contractual Obligations

Our MD&A should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes contained herein and the Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, included in our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on May 27, 2010, and other publicly available information.

Overview

hhgregg, Inc. is a specialty retailer of consumer electronics, home appliances, and related services operating under the name hhgreggTM. As of December 31, 2010, we operated 173 stores in Alabama, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia. Unless otherwise indicated, “hhgregg” refers solely to hhgregg, Inc., “Gregg Appliances” refers solely to Gregg Appliances, Inc. and “we,” “us” and “our” refers to hhgregg, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Gregg Appliances. References to fiscal years in this report relate to the respective twelve month period ended March 31. Our 2011 fiscal year is the twelve month period ending on March 31, 2011.

Throughout our MD&A, we refer to comparable store sales. Comparable store sales is comprised of net sales at stores in operation for at least 14 full months, including remodeled and relocated stores, as well as net sales for our e-commerce site. The method of calculating comparable store sales varies across the retail industry, and our method of calculating comparable store sales may not be the same as other retailers’ methods.

This overview section is divided into four sub-sections discussing our operating strategy and performance, store development strategy, business strategy and core philosophies and seasonality.

Operating Strategy and Performance. We focus the majority of our floor space, advertising expense and distribution infrastructure on the marketing, delivery and installation of a wide selection of premium video and appliance products. We display over 100 models of flat panel televisions and 350 major appliances in our stores with an especially broad assortment of models in the middle- to upper-end of product price ranges. Video and appliance net sales comprised 80% of our net sales mix for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and 82% of our net sales mix for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

We strive to differentiate ourselves through our customer purchase experience starting with a highly-trained, consultative commissioned sales force which educates our customers on the features and benefits of our products, followed by rapid product delivery and installation, and ending with helpful post-sales support services. We carefully monitor our competition to ensure that our prices are competitive in the market place. Our experience has been that informed customers often choose to buy a more heavily-featured product once they understand the applicability and benefits of its features. Heavily-featured products typically carry higher average selling prices and higher margins than less-featured, entry-level price point products.

 

14


Table of Contents

Store Development Strategy. Over the past several years, we have adhered closely to a development strategy of adding stores to metropolitan markets in clusters to achieve rapid market share penetration and more efficiently leverage our distribution network, advertising and regional management costs. Our expansion plans include looking for new markets where we believe there is significant underlying demand for stores, typically in areas that have historically demonstrated above-average economic growth, strong household incomes and growth in new housing starts and/or remodeling activity. Our markets typically include most or all of our major competitors. We plan to continue to follow our approach of building store density in each major market and distribution area, which in the past has helped us to improve our market share and realize operating efficiencies.

During the past twelve months, we opened a net total of 46 new stores, all of which were opened in new markets, including Baltimore, Maryland; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Richmond, Virginia; and Washington, DC. During the past twelve months, we also opened a fourth central distribution center in Brandywine, Maryland to support our growth plans. We opened 42 stores during the first three fiscal quarters of 2011, and we remain on track to open a total of 43 new stores in fiscal 2011.

Our primary capital requirements in the development of new stores are for furniture, fixtures and equipment, along with inventory and pre-opening expenses. This initial investment averages $1.9 million per new store, and our new stores have an average payback period on the investment of less than three years.

Business Strategy and Core Philosophies. Our business strategy is focused around offering our customers a superior customer purchase experience. From the time the customers walk in the door, they experience a well-designed, customer-friendly store. Our stores are brightly lit and have clearly distinguished departments that allow our customers to find what they are looking for. We greet and assist our customers with our highly trained consultative sales force, who educate the customers about the different product features.

Our products are rich in features and innovations and are ever-changing. We believe that customers find it helpful to have someone explain the features and benefits of a product. We believe this assistance allows them the opportunity to buy the product that most closely matches their needs. We follow up on the customer purchase experience by offering same-day delivery on many of our products and a high quality, in-home installation service. We offer all of this at a competitive price, under our philosophy, “Price and Advice, Guaranteed.”

While many of our product offerings are considered essential items by our customers, other products and certain features are viewed as discretionary purchases. As a result, our results of operations are susceptible to a challenging macro-economic environment. Factors such as changes in consumer confidence, unemployment, consumer credit availability and the condition of the housing market have negatively impacted our core product categories and added volatility to our overall business. As consumers show a more cautious approach to purchases of discretionary items, customer traffic and spending patterns continue to be difficult to predict.

The consumer electronics industry depends on new products to drive sales and profitability. Innovative, heavily-featured products are typically introduced at relatively high price points. Over time, price points are gradually reduced to drive consumption. Accordingly, there has been price compression in flat panel televisions for equivalent screen sizes over the past few years. According to the NPD Group, the prices of flat panel televisions in the industry have fallen approximately 40% since January 2008. As with similar product life cycles for console televisions, DVD players and large-screen projection televisions, we have responded to this risk by shifting our sales mix to focus on newer, higher-margin items such as 3-D and IPTV technology, with an increased focus on selection and larger screen sizes. However, lower than expected demand and pricing pressures could result in price points for heavily-featured items declining more quickly, and to a greater extent, than we have historically experienced.

Retail appliance sales are highly correlated to the housing industry and housing turnover. As more people purchase existing homes in the market, appliance sales tend to trend upward. Conversely, when demand in the housing market declines, appliance sales traffic is also negatively impacted. The appliance industry has benefited greatly from increased innovation in energy efficient products. While these energy efficient products typically carry a higher average selling price than traditional products, they save the consumer significant dollars in annual energy savings. Accordingly, average unit selling prices of major appliances are not expected to change dramatically in the foreseeable future.

Seasonality. Our business is seasonal, with a higher portion of net sales and operating profit realized during the quarter that ends December 31 due to the overall demand for consumer electronics during the holiday shopping season.

 

15


Table of Contents

Appliance revenue is impacted by seasonal weather patterns but is less seasonal than our electronics business and helps to offset the seasonality of our overall business.

Critical Accounting Policies

We describe our critical accounting policies and estimates in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 in our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on May 27, 2010. There have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies and estimates since the end of fiscal 2010.

Results of Operations

Operating Performance. The following table presents selected unaudited condensed consolidated financial data (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

     Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  

(unaudited)

   December 31,
2010
    December 31,
2009
    December 31,
2010
    December 31,
2009
 

Net sales

   $ 653,731      $ 500,392      $ 1,570,632      $ 1,116,960   

Net sales % increase

     30.6     20.3     40.6     8.3

Comparable store sales % decrease (1)

     (6.2 )%      (0.2 )%      (1.4 )%      (7.2 )% 

Gross profit as a % of net sales

     29.6     30.5     29.9     30.4

SG&A as a % of net sales

     18.1     18.5     20.7     20.9

Net advertising expense as a % of net sales

     3.5     3.4     4.3     3.8

Depreciation and amortization expense as a % of net sales

     1.1     0.9     1.2     1.1

Income from operations as a % of net sales

     7.0     7.6     3.8     4.6

Net interest expense as a % of net sales

     0.2     0.3     0.2     0.4

Net income

   $ 26,913      $ 22,735      $ 33,573      $ 29,151   

Net income per diluted share

   $ 0.66      $ 0.57      $ 0.83      $ 0.78   

Number of stores open at the end of period

     173        127       

 

(1) Comprised of net sales at stores in operation for at least 14 full months, including remodeled and relocated stores, as well as net sales for our e-commerce site.

Net income was $26.9 million for the three months ended December 31, 2010, or $0.66 of net income per diluted share, compared with net income of $22.7 million, or $0.57 of net income per diluted share, for the three months ended December 31, 2009. For the nine month period ended December 31, 2010, net income was $33.6 million, or $0.83 of net income per diluted share, compared with net income of $29.2 million, or net income per diluted share of $0.78, for the comparable prior year period. The 18.4% and 15.2% increases in net income for the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2010, respectively, as compared to the same periods in the prior year was the result of an increase in net sales due to the net addition of 46 stores during the past 12 months, offset by a decrease in gross margin rate, increased advertising as a percentage of net sales and comparable store sales decreases of 6.2% and 1.4%, respectively.

Net sales for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2010 increased 30.6% and 40.6%, respectively, to $653.7 million and $1.6 billion, respectively, compared to the comparable prior year periods. The increases in net sales for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2010 were primarily attributable to the net addition of 46 stores during the past 12 months, offset by 6.2% and 1.4% decreases in comparable store sales for the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2010, respectively.

 

16


Table of Contents

Net sales mix and comparable store sales percentage changes by product category for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:

 

     Net Sales Mix Summary     Comparable Store Sales Summary  
     Three Months Ended
December 31,
    Nine Months Ended
December 31,
    Three Months Ended
December 31,
    Nine Months Ended
December 31,
 
     2010     2009     2010     2009     2010     2009     2010     2009  

Video

     50     50     46     46     (5.9 )%      (7.5 )%      (1.7 )%      (12.4 )% 

Appliances

     30     30     36     36     (5.7 )%      7.5      1.6      (6.3 )% 

Other (1)

     20     20     18     18     (7.9 )%      9.6      (6.7 )%      6.5 
                                                                

Total

     100     100     100     100     (6.2 )%      (0.2 )%      (1.4 )%      (7.2 )% 
                                                                

 

(1) Primarily consists of audio, furniture and accessories, mattresses, notebook computers and personal electronics.

Comparable store sales in the appliance category decreased 5.7% during the three month period ended December 31, 2010 as a result of moderate decreases in unit demand and average selling price. The strong demand in the first fiscal quarter of 2011 associated with the appliance stimulus programs pulled demand in the appliance category into the first fiscal quarter, thus negatively impacting our results and comparable store sales in our second and third fiscal quarters. This resulted in an overall comparable store sales increase in the appliance category of 1.6% for the nine month period ended December 31, 2010. For the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2010, the decreases in comparable store sales for the video category were due primarily to a double digit decrease in average selling prices driven by lower than expected demand for emerging technologies, partially offset by continued strong overall video unit demand. The comparable store sales decreases in the other category for the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2010 were due primarily to double digit comparable store sales decreases in small electronics and camcorders, partially offset by double digit increases in sales of notebook computers.

Three Months Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended December 31, 2009

Gross profit margin, expressed as gross profit as a percentage of net sales, decreased approximately 87 basis points for the three months ended December 31, 2010 versus the comparable prior year period. The decrease in gross profit margin percentage was primarily due to a net sales mix shift within the video category. The video category saw a greater increase in demand for entry level products, including smaller screen sizes which carry lower margins than bigger, more feature rich screen sizes. The other category gross profit margin percentage increased slightly, but carries a gross margin percentage less than our company average.

SG&A, as a percentage of net sales, decreased approximately 46 basis points for the three months ended December 31, 2010, compared with the prior year period. SG&A was $118.1 million for the three months ended December 31, 2010 compared to $92.7 million for the comparable prior year period. The improvement is primarily due to increased leverage of expenses based on our overall increase in sales.

Net advertising expense, as a percentage of net sales, increased approximately 7 basis points during the three months ended December 31, 2010, compared with the prior year period. Net advertising expense was $22.9 million for the three months ended December 31, 2010 compared to $17.2 million for the comparable prior year period. The increase in net advertising expense as a percentage of net sales was the result of increased spend as a percentage of net sales due to decreases in comparable store sales slightly offset by greater advertising support from vendors.

Our effective income tax rate for the three months ended December 31, 2010 increased to 39.2% compared to 38.5% in the comparable prior year period. The increase in our effective income tax rate is primarily the result of changes in the expected annual effective state income tax rate for fiscal 2011.

Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Nine Months Ended December 31, 2009

Gross profit margin, expressed as gross profit as a percentage of net sales, decreased approximately 45 basis points for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 to 29.9% from 30.4%. The decrease in the gross profit margin percentage was primarily due to a net sales mix shift within the video category. The video category saw a greater increase in demand for entry level products, including smaller screen sizes which carry lower margins than bigger, more feature rich screen sizes.

 

17


Table of Contents

The other category gross profit margin increased slightly, but carries a gross margin percentage less than our company average.

SG&A, as a percentage of net sales, decreased approximately 19 basis points for the nine months ended December 31, 2010, compared with the prior year period. SG&A was $325.2 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 compared to $233.3 million for the comparable prior year period. The improvement is primarily due to increased leverage of expenses based on our overall increase in sales, offset by $4.4 million of investments, including training, relocation and travel expenses incurred in connection with launching new stores in the Mid-Atlantic region.

Net advertising expense, as a percentage of net sales, increased approximately 45 basis points during the nine months ended December 31, 2010 when compared with the comparable prior year period. Net advertising expense was $66.8 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 compared to $42.5 million for the comparable prior year period. The increase in advertising expense as a percentage of net sales for the nine month period was primarily driven by increased spend associated with the grand opening of 42 stores during the nine month period ended December 31, 2010, compared to the grand opening of 18 stores in the comparable prior year period and the comparable store sales decrease, slightly offset by greater advertising support from vendors.

Our effective income tax rate for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 increased to 39.2% compared to 38.5% in the comparable prior year period. The increase in our effective income tax rate is primarily the result of changes in the expected annual effective state income tax rate for fiscal 2011.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table presents a summary on a consolidated basis of our net cash (used in) provided by operating, investing and financing activities (dollars are in thousands):

 

     Nine Months Ended  
     December 31, 2010     December 31, 2009  

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

   $ (43,441   $ 1,396   

Net cash used in investing activities

     (48,886     (30,466

Net cash provided by financing activities

     6,026        107,241   

Our liquidity requirements arise primarily from our need to fund working capital requirements and capital expenditures.

Capital Expenditures. We make capital expenditures principally to fund our expansion strategy, which includes, among other things, investments in new stores and new distribution facilities, remodeling and relocation of existing stores, as well as information technology and other infrastructure-related projects that support our expansion. Capital expenditures were $49.0 million and $34.2 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, primarily due to the opening of new stores. We plan on opening 43 new stores during fiscal 2011, of which 42 stores had been opened as of December 31, 2010. During fiscal 2012, we plan to continue to invest in our infrastructure, including management information systems and distribution capabilities, as well as incur capital remodeling and improvement costs. We expect net capital expenditures, after sale and leaseback proceeds and including tenant allowances from landlords, for fiscal 2011 store openings and relocations to range between $42 million and $47 million. Capital expenditures for fiscal 2011 will be funded through cash and cash equivalents, borrowings under our revolving credit facility and tenant allowances from landlords.

Cash (Used in) Provided by Operating Activities. Cash (used in) provided by operating activities primarily consists of net income as adjusted for increases or decreases in working capital and non-cash depreciation and amortization. Cash (used in) provided by operating activities was ($43.4) million and $1.4 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in cash used in operating activities is primarily due to an increase in our net investment in merchandise inventories (merchandise inventories less accounts payable) and excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation. The change in cash flows relating to merchandise inventories was the result of purchases for stores opened in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 and for existing stores. The change in cash flows related to excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation was the result of stock option exercises. These increases in cash used in operating

 

18


Table of Contents

activities were partially offset by cash provided by tenant allowances received from landlords, the change in income tax receivable, and the net change in our other current operating assets and liabilities, the change in which was primarily a result of differences in timing of customer sales and vendor payments.

Cash Used In Investing Activities. Cash used in investing activities was $48.9 million and $30.5 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in cash used in investing activities is due to increased purchases of property and equipment associated with the opening of 42 new stores in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 compared to 18 new store openings in the first three quarters of fiscal 2010 in addition to a decrease in net proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions, slightly offset by a decrease in deposits on future sale-leaseback transactions.

Cash Provided by Financing Activities. Cash provided by financing activities was $6.0 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 compared to $107.2 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2009. The decrease is primarily due to the stock offering completed during the nine months ended December 31, 2009 that resulted in net proceeds of approximately $78.1 million. The remaining change is primarily due to an increase in excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation as a result of stock option exercises, offset by payments of withholding tax as a result of the net settlement of options and a decrease in cash as a result of a net decrease in bank overdrafts, due to a difference in timing.

Senior Secured Term Loan. On July 25, 2007, Gregg Appliances entered into a senior credit agreement (the “Term B Facility”) with a bank group obtaining a $100 million senior secured term loan B maturing on July 25, 2013. Interest on borrowings is payable in defined periods, currently monthly, depending on our election of the bank’s prime rate or LIBOR plus an applicable margin, currently 200 basis points. The weighted average interest rate on the term loan as of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010 was 2.3% and 2.5%, respectively. We entered into an interest rate related derivative on $75 million of the Term B Facility which adjusts the effective weighted average interest rate on the Term B Facility at December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010 to 3.9%.

The loans under the Term B Facility were originally scheduled to be repaid in consecutive quarterly installments of $250,000 each with a balloon payment at maturity, but as Gregg Appliances made an optional $10 million prepayment during fiscal 2008, the remaining scheduled quarterly principal installments were reduced to $227,099 with a balloon payment at maturity. As provided in the Term B Facility, the prepayment was first applied to the next four scheduled principal installments of the loan occurring in fiscal 2009 and secondly applied on a pro rata basis to reduce the remaining scheduled principal installments of the loan. In accordance with the Term B Facility, the next principal payment is due on March 31, 2011. In addition, Gregg Appliances is also required to prepay the outstanding loan, subject to certain exceptions, with annual excess cash flow and certain other proceeds (as defined in the Term B Facility). As of December 31, 2010, $87.7 million was outstanding on the Term B Facility and no additional prepayment was required to be made for the period ended December 31, 2010.

The Term B Facility contains customary representations and warranties and customary affirmative and negative covenants, including, among other things, restrictions on incurrence of additional debt, liens, dividends and other restricted payments, asset sales, investments, mergers and acquisitions and affiliate transactions. The only financial covenant included in the Term B Facility is a maximum leverage ratio. Events of default under the Term B Facility include, among others, nonpayment of principal or interest, covenant defaults, material breaches of representations and warranties, bankruptcy and insolvency events, cross defaults and a change of control. Gregg Appliances was in compliance with the restrictions and covenants in the Term B Facility at December 31, 2010.

Revolving Credit Facility. On July 25, 2007, Gregg Appliances entered into an Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (“Revolving Credit Facility”) with a bank group for up to $100 million. On September 15, 2009, Gregg Appliances entered into Amendment No. 1 and Joinder to the Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (“Amendment No. 1”) with a bank group, which amended the Revolving Credit Facility. Amendment No. 1 increased the maximum amount available under the Revolving Credit Facility from $100 million to $125 million, subject to borrowing base availability. Under the Revolving Credit Facility, as amended by Amendment No. 1, borrowings from time to time shall not exceed a defined borrowing base. Interest on borrowings is payable monthly at a fluctuating rate based on the bank’s prime rate or LIBOR plus an applicable margin. The annual commitment fee is 0.25% on the unused portion of the facility and 1.25% for outstanding letters of credit. The Revolving Credit Facility is guaranteed by Gregg Appliances’ wholly-owned subsidiary, HHG Distributing LLC (“HHG”), which has no assets or operations. The guarantee is full and unconditional and Gregg Appliances has no other subsidiaries. In addition, there are no restrictions on HHG’s ability to pay dividends under the arrangement. Gregg Appliances was in compliance with the restrictions and covenants in the Revolving Credit Facility at December 31, 2010.

 

19


Table of Contents

Pursuant to Amendment No. 1, the borrowing base was modified to equal the sum of (i) the lesser of (a) 90% of the net orderly liquidation value of all eligible inventory of Gregg Appliances and (b) 75% of the net book value of such eligible inventory and (ii) 90% of all commercial and credit card receivables of Gregg Appliances, in each case subject to customary reserves and eligibility criteria. Prior to Amendment No. 1, the borrowing base equaled the sum of (i) the lesser of (a) 93% (96% during a seasonal period) of the net orderly liquidation value of all eligible inventory of Gregg Appliances and (b) 75% of the net book value of such eligible inventory and (ii) 90% of all commercial and credit card receivables of Gregg Appliances, in each case subject to customary reserves and eligibility criteria. Amendment No. 1 required payment to the incremental lenders of a commitment fee equal to 5.0% of the incremental commitment, or $1,250,000.

Under the Revolving Credit Facility, as amended by Amendment No.1, Gregg Appliances is not required to comply with any financial maintenance covenant unless it has less than $18.75 million of “excess availability” at any time, during the continuance of which event Gregg Appliances is subject to compliance with a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.10 to 1.0. Amendment No. 1 allows up to $5.0 million of additional availability to be included in the total of “excess availability” for the months of October and November.

Amendment No. 1 also modifies the trigger point for the initiation of cash dominion control. Prior to Amendment No. 1, if Gregg Appliances had less than $8.5 million of “excess availability”, it would, in certain circumstances, become subject to cash dominion control. Pursuant to Amendment No. 1, if Gregg Appliances has less than $18.75 million of “excess availability,” it may, in certain circumstances more specifically described in the Revolving Credit Facility, as amended by Amendment No. 1, become subject to cash dominion control.

As of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, under the Revolving Credit Facility, we had no cash borrowings outstanding and had $4.8 million of letters of credit outstanding, which expire through December 31, 2011. As of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, the total borrowing availability under the Revolving Credit Facility was $120.2 million and $117.5 million, respectively. The interest rate based on the bank’s prime rate as of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010 was 3.0%.

Long Term Liquidity. Anticipated cash flows from operations and funds available from our credit facilities, together with cash on hand, should provide sufficient funds to finance our operations for at least the next 12 months. As a normal part of our business, we consider opportunities to refinance our existing indebtedness, based on market conditions. Although we may refinance all or part of our existing indebtedness in the future, there can be no assurances that we will do so. Changes in our operating plans, lower than anticipated sales, increased expenses, acquisitions or other events may require us to seek additional debt or equity financing. There can be no guarantee that financing will be available on acceptable terms or at all. Additional debt financing, if available, could impose additional cash payment obligations and additional covenants and operating restrictions.

A downgrade in our credit ratings could adversely impact, among other things, our future borrowing costs, access to capital markets, vendor financing terms and future new-store occupancy costs. Factors that can affect our credit ratings include changes in our operating performance, the general economic environment, conditions in the retail and consumer electronics industries, our financial position, and changes in our business strategy. We are not aware of any existing circumstances which would be reasonably likely to result in a significant downgrade of our credit ratings.

Cash Flow Hedge. During fiscal 2008, we entered into an interest-rate related derivative instrument to manage our exposure on our debt instruments. This derivative instrument expired in October 2009. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 we entered into another derivative instrument that became effective October 2009 and expires in October 2011.

We assess interest rate cash flow risk by continually identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities. We maintain risk management control systems to monitor interest rate cash flow risk attributable to both our outstanding or forecasted debt obligations as well as our offsetting hedge positions. The risk management control systems involve the use of analytical techniques, including cash flow sensitivity analysis, to estimate the expected impact of changes in interest rates on our future cash flows.

We use variable-rate debt to finance our operations. The debt obligations expose us to variability in interest payments due to changes in interest rates. We believe that it is prudent to limit the variability of a portion of our interest payments. To meet this objective, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement to manage fluctuations in cash flows resulting from changes in the benchmark interest rate of LIBOR on $50 million of our Term B Facility in fiscal 2008. Upon the expiration

 

20


Table of Contents

of this interest rate swap agreement in October 2009, we entered into another interest rate swap agreement for $75 million effective October 2009 and expiring October 2011. These swaps change the variable-rate cash flow exposure on the debt obligations to fixed cash flows. Under the terms of the interest rate swaps, we receive LIBOR based variable interest rate payments and make fixed interest rate payments, thereby creating the equivalent of fixed-rate debt for the notional amount of the debt that is hedged.

Changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps designated as hedging instruments that effectively offset the variability of cash flows associated with variable-rate, long-term debt obligations are reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss. These amounts subsequently are reclassified into interest expense as a yield adjustment of the hedged interest payments in the same period in which the related interest affects earnings.

For the three and nine months ended December 31, 2010 the hedges were considered effective and $0.4 million and $1.1 million, respectively, was recorded as interest expense for recognized losses on the cash flow hedges.

Contractual Obligations

We entered into lease commitments totaling approximately $133.4 million over their respective lease terms during the nine months ended December 31, 2010. There have been no other significant changes in our contractual obligations since the end of fiscal 2010. See our “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 in our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on May 27, 2010 for additional information regarding our contractual obligations.

Forward-Looking Statements

Some of the statements in this document constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our business’ or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies, prospects, changes, outlook and trends in our business and the markets in which we operate under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “tends,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of those terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially because of market conditions in our industry or other factors. All of the forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to the factors discussed under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” herein, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on May 27, 2010 and the Risk Factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on May 27, 2010. The forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this document and we assume no obligation to update the forward-looking statements or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements.

 

21


Table of Contents
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

In addition to the risks inherent in our operations, we are exposed to certain market risks, including interest rate risk.

Interest Rate Risk

Our short-term and long-term debt consists of our Revolving Credit Facility and our Term B Facility.

Interest on borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility is payable monthly at a fluctuating rate based on the bank’s prime rate or LIBOR plus an applicable margin. As of December 31, 2010, we had no cash borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility.

As of December 31, 2010, we had $87.7 million outstanding on our Term B Facility. Interest on our Term B Facility is payable in defined periods, currently monthly, depending on our election of the bank’s prime rate or LIBOR plus an applicable margin. We are not subject to material interest rate risk as $75.0 million of the outstanding amount of Term B Facility is subject to an interest rate hedge. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in the bank’s prime rate would decrease our annual pre-tax income by approximately $0.1 million.

 

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We have established a Disclosure Committee, consisting of certain members of management, to assist in this evaluation. Our Disclosure Committee meets on a quarterly basis and more often if necessary.

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act), as of December 31, 2010. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

22


Table of Contents

Part II. Other Information

 

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings

We are engaged in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business and have certain unresolved claims pending. The ultimate liability, if any, for the aggregate amounts claimed cannot be determined at this time. However, management believes, based on the examination of these matters and experiences to date, that the ultimate liability, if any, in excess of amounts already provided for in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements is not likely to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

Except for the new risk factor described below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on May 27, 2010.

We may experience significant price pressures over the life cycle of our consumer electronics products which may negatively impact our ability to maintain historical comparable store sales levels.

The consumer electronics industry depends on new products to drive sales and profitability. Innovative, heavily-featured products are typically introduced at relatively high price points. In response to continuing pressure from consumers and our competitors, price points may be reduced more quickly, and to a greater degree, as compared to our prior practice in order to drive consumption. As a result, unit sales must increase at a greater rate than average selling prices decline in order to maintain or grow comparable store sales. If new product introductions do not drive enough sales volume at higher price points, prices will have to be reduced in order to sell existing inventory, which may negatively impact our ability to maintain our historical comparable store sales levels.

 

ITEM 6. Exhibits

 

31.1    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2    Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2    Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

23


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

HHGREGG, INC.

By:

 

/s/    JEREMY J. AGUILAR          

 

Jeremy J. Aguilar

Principal Financial Officer

Dated: February 8, 2011

 

24