Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - PREMIER EXHIBITIONS, INC. | c10757exv32w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - PREMIER EXHIBITIONS, INC. | c10757exv31w2.htm |
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - PREMIER EXHIBITIONS, INC. | c10757exv31w1.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended November 30, 2010
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 000-24452
PREMIER EXHIBITIONS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Florida | 20-1424922 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
incorporation or organization) | ||
3340 Peachtree Road, NE, Suite 900, Atlanta, GA | 30326 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(404) 842-2600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for at least the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and
posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting Company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company þ | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock on January 7, 2011 was 47,067,652.
PREMIER EXHIBITIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No. | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
13 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.1 |
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
Premier Exhibitions, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
November 30, | February 28, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 6,329 | $ | 10,339 | ||||
Marketable securities |
803 | 3,308 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $664 and $697, respectively |
1,588 | 2,613 | ||||||
Merchandise inventory, net of reserve of $280 and $281, respectively |
1,127 | 845 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable |
521 | 3,161 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
4,030 | 1,666 | ||||||
Other current assets |
167 | 200 | ||||||
Total current assets |
14,565 | 22,132 | ||||||
Artifacts owned, at cost |
3,016 | 3,048 | ||||||
Salvors lien |
1 | 1 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $14,416 and $11,454, respectively |
12,108 | 13,545 | ||||||
Exhibition licenses, net of accumulated amortization of $5,658 and $4,979, respectively |
2,890 | 3,269 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 927 | ||||||
Other long term assets |
829 | 829 | ||||||
Titanic expedition costs incurred |
3,887 | | ||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 37,296 | $ | 43,751 | ||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
$ | 8,428 | $ | 5,518 | ||||
Deferred revenue |
961 | 1,705 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
9,389 | 7,223 | ||||||
Long-term liabilities: |
||||||||
Lease abandonment |
3,163 | 3,666 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
| 1,214 | ||||||
Total long-term liabilities |
3,163 | 4,880 | ||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock; $.0001 par value; authorized 65,000,000 shares; issued 48,069,661 and
47,804,742 shares, respectively; outstanding 47,067,652 and 46,738,293 shares, respectively |
5 | 5 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
58,158 | 57,759 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(25,959 | ) | (18,613 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(503 | ) | (313 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock, at cost; 1,002,009 and 1,002,009 shares, respectively |
(7,190 | ) | (7,190 | ) | ||||
Equity Attributable to Shareholders of Premier Exhibitions, Inc. |
24,511 | 31,648 | ||||||
Equity Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests |
233 | | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholder Equity |
$ | 37,296 | $ | 43,751 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
Premier Exhibitions, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended November 30, | Nine Months Ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Exhibition revenue |
$ | 8,870 | $ | 7,949 | $ | 31,744 | $ | 30,302 | ||||||||
Merchandise and other |
1,352 | 753 | 3,249 | 2,777 | ||||||||||||
Total revenue |
10,222 | 8,702 | 34,993 | 33,079 | ||||||||||||
Cost of revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Exhibition costs |
10,299 | 5,719 | 24,895 | 15,661 | ||||||||||||
Cost of merchandise sold |
370 | 340 | 870 | 805 | ||||||||||||
Total cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation
and amortization shown separately below) |
10,669 | 6,059 | 25,765 | 16,466 | ||||||||||||
Gross (loss) profit |
(447 | ) | 2,643 | 9,228 | 16,613 | |||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
4,627 | 4,660 | 13,521 | 19,433 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,200 | 1,412 | 3,716 | 4,357 | ||||||||||||
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets |
| | | 4,512 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
5,827 | 6,072 | 17,237 | 28,302 | ||||||||||||
Loss from operations |
(6,274 | ) | (3,429 | ) | (8,009 | ) | (11,689 | ) | ||||||||
Other income (expense) |
12 | (46 | ) | 30 | (255 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss before provision for income taxes |
(6,262 | ) | (3,475 | ) | (7,979 | ) | (11,944 | ) | ||||||||
Benefit from income taxes |
529 | 1,305 | 488 | 3,457 | ||||||||||||
Net loss |
(5,733 | ) | (2,170 | ) | (7,491 | ) | (8,487 | ) | ||||||||
Plus: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests |
56 | | 146 | | ||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to the shareholders of Premier |
$ | (5,677 | ) | $ | (2,170 | ) | $ | (7,345 | ) | $ | (8,487 | ) | ||||
Net loss per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic loss per common share |
$ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | $ | (0.25 | ) | ||||
Diluted loss per common share |
$ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | $ | (0.25 | ) | ||||
Shares used in basic per share calculations |
46,913,601 | 41,019,416 | 46,873,879 | 33,617,577 | ||||||||||||
Shares used in diluted per share calculations |
46,913,601 | 41,019,416 | 46,873,879 | 33,617,577 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
Premier Exhibitions, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
November 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (7,491 | ) | $ | (8,487 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
3,716 | 4,357 | ||||||
Stock based compensation |
418 | 468 | ||||||
Stock issued in settlement of lawsuit |
| 50 | ||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
(33 | ) | (588 | ) | ||||
Loss on sale of fixed assets |
31 | | ||||||
Lease abandonment |
(503 | ) | | |||||
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets |
| 4,512 | ||||||
Accrued interest converted into common stock |
| 247 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Decrease in accounts receivable |
1,058 | 2,599 | ||||||
Increase in merchandise inventories |
(282 | ) | (318 | ) | ||||
Decrease in deferred income taxes |
927 | 36 | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses |
(2,364 | ) | 86 | |||||
Decrease in other assets |
33 | 1,440 | ||||||
Decrease (increase) in income tax receivable |
1,426 | (2,904 | ) | |||||
Decrease in deferred revenue |
(744 | ) | (399 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued
liabilities |
2,910 | (7,398 | ) | |||||
Total adjustments |
6,593 | 2,188 | ||||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(898 | ) | (6,299 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(1,640 | ) | (1,486 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
9 | | ||||||
Purchase of exhibition licenses |
(300 | ) | | |||||
Purchase of marketable securities |
(87 | ) | (2,023 | ) | ||||
Sale of marketable securities |
2,582 | | ||||||
Decrease in artifacts |
32 | | ||||||
Titanic expedition costs incurred |
(3,887 | ) | | |||||
Cash provided by non-controlling interest |
379 | | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(2,912 | ) | (3,509 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from convertible notes |
| 12,000 | ||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
(136 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from option and warrant exercises |
117 | 261 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(19 | ) | 12,261 | |||||
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(181 | ) | 22 | |||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(4,010 | ) | 2,475 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
10,339 | 4,452 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 6,329 | $ | 6,927 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for interest |
$ | 3 | $ | 670 | ||||
Cash paid during the period for taxes |
$ | 141 | $ | 967 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||
Cashless exercise of stock options |
$ | | $ | 14 | ||||
Conversion of convertible notes and accrued interest |
$ | | $ | 12,247 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
PREMIER EXHIBITIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
1. Background and Basis of Presentation
Description of Business
Premier Exhibitions, Inc. is in the business of presenting to the public museum-quality
touring exhibitions around the world. Since our establishment in 1991, we have developed, deployed
and operated unique exhibition products that are presented to the public in exhibition centers,
museums and non-traditional venues. Income from exhibitions is generated primarily through ticket
sales, third-party licensing, sponsorships and merchandise sales.
Our exhibitions regularly tour outside the United States. Approximately 13% and 11% of our
revenues for the nine months ended November 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, resulted from
exhibition activities outside the United States. As many of our financial arrangements with our
foreign vendors are based upon foreign currencies, we are exposed to the risk of currency
fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and the currencies of the countries in which our exhibitions
are touring.
Basis of Presentation
When we use the terms Premier, Company, we, us and our, we mean Premier Exhibitions,
Inc., a Florida corporation and its subsidiaries. We have prepared the accompanying unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements and condensed notes pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP) regarding interim financial reporting. Accordingly,
they do not contain all of the information and notes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial
statements and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended February 28, 2010. In
our opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all
adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair
presentation of our financial condition as of November 30, 2010, our results of operations for the
three and nine months ended November 30, 2010 and 2009 and cash flows for the nine months ended
November 30, 2010 and 2009. The data in the consolidated balance sheet as of February 28, 2010 was
derived from our audited consolidated balance sheet as of February 28, 2010, as presented in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended February 28, 2010. The unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Premier, its wholly owned subsidiaries
after the elimination of all significant intercompany accounts and transactions, and its
consolidated joint venture. Our operating results for the three months and nine months ended
November 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that may be expected for
the full fiscal year ending February 28, 2011 (fiscal 2011).
Significant Accounting Policies
For a description of significant accounting policies, see the Significant Accounting Policies
footnote to the Financial Statements included in the Companys 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
There have been no material changes to the Companys significant accounting policies since the
filing of the Companys 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from reported results using those estimates.
6
Table of Contents
Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated subsequent events for recognition and disclosure through the date
the condensed consolidated financial statements were issued.
2. Income taxes
In October 2010, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) completed its examination of the
Companys U.S. federal tax returns for the year ended February 28, 2007 (fiscal 2007) through the
year ended February 28, 2009 (fiscal 2009) with no adjustments required. Accordingly, during the
quarter ended November 30, 2010 the Company released its $1.2 million tax liability balance for
uncertain tax provisions as prior period tax positions did not require adjustment. The decrease in
unrecognized tax benefits and related interest resulted in an income tax benefit of $0.3 million
after consideration of the impact of deferred taxes for the three and nine months ended November
30, 2010.
3. Loss Per Share Data
Basic per share amounts exclude dilution and are computed using the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted per share amounts reflect the potential reduction
in earnings per share that could occur if equity based awards were exercised or converted into
common stock, unless the effects are anti-dilutive (i.e., the exercise price is greater than the
average market price of the common shares). Potential common shares are determined using the
treasury stock method and include common shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options
and warrants.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share. Since
the three and nine month periods ended November 30, 2010 and 2009 resulted in a net loss, the
impact of dilutive effects of stock options was not added to the weighted average shares.
Three Months Ended November 30, | Nine Months Ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||||||||
Net loss attributable
to the shareholders of Premier |
$ | (5,677 | ) | $ | (2,170 | ) | $ | (7,345 | ) | $ | (8,487 | ) | ||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic weighted-average
shares outstanding |
46,913,601 | 41,019,416 | 46,873,879 | 33,617,577 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive stock
options and warrants |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Diluted weighted-average
shares outstanding |
46,913,601 | 41,019,416 | 46,873,879 | 33,617,577 | ||||||||||||
Net loss per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | $ | (0.25 | ) | ||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | $ | (0.25 | ) | ||||
Equity based awards not included in the per share computation because the option exercise
price was greater than the average market price of the common shares are reflected in the following
table.
Three Months Ended November 30, | Nine Months Ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Stock options |
2,743,115 | 3,001,453 | 2,796,449 | 4,171,453 | ||||||||||||
7
Table of Contents
4. Total Comprehensive Loss
The following table provides a summary of total comprehensive loss for the applicable periods
(in thousands):
Three Months Ended November 30, | Nine Months Ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to the shareholders of Premier |
$ | (5,677 | ) | $ | (2,170 | ) | $ | (7,345 | ) | $ | (8,487 | ) | ||||
Other comprehensive loss: |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on marketable securities |
(10 | ) | | (10 | ) | | ||||||||||
Net foreign currency translation loss |
(103 | ) | (1 | ) | (181 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||||
Total comprehensive loss |
$ | (5,790 | ) | $ | (2,171 | ) | $ | (7,536 | ) | $ | (8,509 | ) | ||||
5. 2010 Expedition to Titanic Wreck Site
During August and September 2010, our wholly owned subsidiary RMS Titanic, Inc. (RMST), as
Salvor-In-Possession of the RMS Titanic (the Titanic) and its wreck site, conducted an expedition
to the Titanic wreck site 25 years after its discovery to develop a comprehensive archaeological
map of the wreck site utilizing state-of-the-art high definition 2D and 3D cameras and sonar scans.
RMST brought together an alliance of the worlds leading archaeologists, oceanographers and
scientists together with U.S. governmental agencies to join RMST in the 2010 expedition to the
wreck site and the post-expedition scientific study. This alliance included the Woods Hole
Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), the Institute of Nautical Archaeology (INA), the National Oceanic
Atmospheric Administrations Office of the National Marine Sanctuaries (NOAA/ONMS), The National
Park Services Submerged Resources Center (NPS) and the Waitt Institute. Never before had all of
these entities partnered to work together on one project.
The general purpose of the expedition was to collect and interpret scientific data for the
long-term protection and management of Titanic. The collected information, including 2D and 3D
moving imagery, sonar imagery and other data, will be used to educate and enlighten future
generations and will be added to the Companys proprietary collection of Titanic artifacts. This
information will provide the basis for an archaeological site plan of the wreck site, and
ultimately a comprehensive long-term site management plan. The work product of the dive also has
commercial value for public consumption through various distribution channels including movie
theatres, our traveling museum exhibitions, straight to home DVD release, and retail merchandise
sales in our stores, online and through wholesale and licensing. We have sole legal ownership of
the footage taken during the entire expedition. Accordingly, the Company has recorded $3.9 million
in long-term assets related to costs incurred to obtain the film footage and still images during
the expedition, as well as the establishment of a web point of presence for the expedition,
www.expeditiontitanic.com, which allowed visitors to the site to participate in the dive as it was
in process.
The
costs incurred and capitalized on the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets as of November 30, 2010 are summarized as follows:
Ship charter
costs, underwater
equipment and filming |
$ | 2,935,211 | ||
General
management |
635,270 | |||
Titanic
Preservation Alliance point of presence |
316,997 | |||
Total
historical costs capitalized |
$ | 3,887,478 | ||
The Company has not completed the assignment and allocation of costs to specific assets as of
November 30, 2010, as it is currently evaluating the quality of the output and consulting with
third parties to determine highest and best uses, budgeted costs, and timelines to completion of
each asset in order to place them in service.
8
Table of Contents
6. Non-controlling Interest
On May 14, 2010, the Company entered into a joint venture arrangement with Michael Cohls
promotional firm, S2BN Entertainment Corporation (S2BN), to develop, design and produce future
exhibitions. The Company and S2BN each own 50 percent of the joint venture and will share equally
in the funding requirements and profits and losses of the joint venture exhibitions. The Company
and S2BN will work together to identify, develop and produce mutually agreed upon new exhibitions
or entertainment properties within the realm of popular culture. Although a 50/50 profit and loss
sharing agreement is in place, other considerations regarding management and advancement of the
joint venture have led management to conclude that it has significant control. Therefore, the
joint ventures results have been consolidated into the Companys financial statements and
reflected as a minority interest.
In addition to costs incurred in prior periods, the Company has incurred $206 thousand in
expenditures in fiscal 2011 for developing, creating and compiling the business and marketing plans
as well as extending the exhibition rights for one such popular culture exhibit. S2BN has agreed
to reimburse 50 percent of the enumerated costs incurred related to this initial exhibit concept.
During the nine months ended November 30, 2010, the Company received $379 thousand in
reimbursements from S2BN for total development costs incurred to date.
7. Stock Repurchase
On July 30, 2010 the Company announced a plan to repurchase up to 1.0 million of the Companys
common stock, and that repurchases may occur on the open market at times and prices considered
appropriate by the Board of Directors and management. Furthermore, the Company disclosed
repurchases may take place through brokers and dealers or in privately negotiated transactions, and
may be made under a Rule 10b5-1 plan. During the second quarter of 2011, the Company repurchased
115,081 shares of common stock pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. The average cost of the
shares repurchased was $1.16 and the Company subsequently retired these shares.
8. Legal Proceedings and Contingencies
The Company is party to an ongoing salvage case titled RMS Titanic, Inc. v. The Wrecked and
Abandoned Vessel, et al., in rem. The Company has maintained its status as sole
Salvor-in-Possession of the Titanic wreck site and is awaiting an interim salvage award, in the
form of title to the recovered Titanic artifacts or a monetary award.
In June 1994, the U. S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia awarded ownership
to our wholly-owned subsidiary RMS Titanic, Inc., or RMST, of all items then salvaged from the
wreck of the Titanic as well as all items to be salvaged in the future so long as RMST remained
Salvor-in-Possession. However, in two orders, dated September 26, 2001 and October 19, 2001,
respectively, the district court restricted the sale of artifacts recovered by RMST from the
Titanic wreck site. On April 12, 2002, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed
the two orders of the district court. In its opinion, the appellate court reviewed and declared
ambiguous the June 1994 order of the district court that had awarded ownership to RMST of the
salvaged items. Having found the June 1994 order ambiguous, the court of appeals reinterpreted the
order to convey only possession of the artifacts with a lien on them, not title, pending
determination of a salvage award. On October 7, 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court denied RMSTs
petition of appeal.
On May 17, 2004, RMST appeared before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Virginia for a pre-trial hearing to address issues in preparation for an interim salvage award
trial. At that hearing, RMST confirmed its intent to retain its Salvor-in-Possession rights in
order to exclusively recover and preserve artifacts from the wreck site of the Titanic. In
addition, RMST stated its intent to conduct another expedition to the wreck site. As a result of
that hearing, on July 2, 2004, the court rendered an opinion and order in which it held that it
would not recognize a 1993 Proces-Verbal, pursuant to which the government of France granted RMST
title to all artifacts recovered from the wreck site during the 1987 expedition. The court also
held that RMST would not be permitted to present evidence at the interim salvage award trial for
the purpose of arguing that RMST should be awarded title to the Titanic artifacts through the law
of finds.
RMST appealed the July 2, 2004 court order to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth
Circuit. On January 31, 2006, the court of appeals reversed the lower courts decision to
invalidate the 1993 Proces-Verbal, pursuant to which the government of France granted RMST title to
all artifacts recovered from the wreck site during the 1987 expedition. As a result, the appellate
court tacitly reconfirmed that RMST owns the approximately 2,000 artifacts recovered during the
1987 expedition. The appellate court affirmed the lower courts ruling that RMST will not be
permitted to present evidence at the interim salvage award trial for the purpose of arguing that
RMST should be awarded legal title to the remainder of the Titanic artifacts through the law of
finds.
9
Table of Contents
On November 30, 2007, RMST filed a motion with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, Norfolk Division seeking an interim salvage award. On March 25, 2008, the
court entered an order granting permission to the U.S. to file an amicus curiae (friend of the
court) response regarding
RMSTs motion for an interim salvage award. The U.S. response states that an interim in specie
award (an award of the artifacts instead of a monetary salvage award) with limitations, made by the
court to RMST, could serve as an appropriate mechanism to satisfy RMSTs motion for a salvage award
and to help ensure that the artifacts recovered by RMST from the wreck of the Titanic are conserved
and curated together in an intact collection that is available to the public for historical review,
educational purposes, and scientific research in perpetuity. On April 15, 2008, the District Court
entered an order requesting us to propose suggested covenants that would be included in an in
specie award. The order also outlines a process for further discussion pertaining to such covenants
should the court decide to issue an in specie award.
In September 2008, RMST submitted revised covenants and conditions in connection with our
request for an in specie award for the remaining Titanic artifacts. This submission was made
pursuant to the order issued by the U.S. District Court in April 2008. As part of developing the
revised covenants and restrictions, we engaged in consultative discussions with the U.S.
government. On October 14, 2008, the U.S. filed an amicus response to RMSTs proposed revised
covenants, and by leave of the District Court granted on October 31, 2008, RMST in turn filed a
reply brief on November 12, 2008. On November 18, 2008, we attended a status conference at the
District Court. At the conclusion of that hearing, the District Court asked for certain additional
submissions from RMST and the U.S., which were provided.
On October 23, 2009, the Board of Directors approved a resolution obligating RMST to create a
trust and reserve fund (the Trust Account) if the District Court issues RMST an in-specie award
in response to its motion for a salvage award and such in-specie award is issued subject only to
the covenants and conditions already presented to and filed with the Court in conjunction with the
Companys motion for a salvage award. The Trust Account will be irrevocably pledged to and held
for the exclusive purpose of providing a performance guarantee for the maintenance and preservation
of the Titanic collection for the public interest. If the Trust Account is created, the Company
will make an initial payment of five hundred thousand dollars ($500 thousand) and will subsequently
pay into the Trust Account a minimum of twenty five thousand dollars ($25 thousand) for each future
fiscal quarter until the corpus of such Trust Account equals five million dollars ($5 million).
This resolution was presented to the District Court in connection with the Companys motion for a
salvage award.
The District Court held an evidentiary hearing from October 26, 2009 through November 2, 2009
on our motion for a salvage award. On August 12, 2010, the District Court issued an opinion
granting a salvage award to RMST based upon the Companys work in recovering and conserving over
three thousand artifacts from the wreck of Titanic during its expeditions conducted in 1993, 1994,
1996, 1998, 2000, and 2004. The Company was awarded 100 percent of the fair market value of the
artifacts, which the Court set at approximately $110 million. The Court has reserved the right to
determine the manner in which to pay the award. It will determine by August 15, 2011, whether to
pay the Company a cash award from proceeds derived from a judicial sale, or in the alternative, to
issue the Company an in specie award of title to the artifacts with certain covenants and
conditions which would govern their maintenance and future disposition.
Status of International Treaty Concerning the Titanic Wreck
The U.S. Department of State, or State Department, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration of the U.S. Department of Commerce are working together to implement an
international treaty with the governments of the United Kingdom, France and Canada concerning the
Titanic wreck site. If implemented in this country, this treaty could affect the way the U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division, monitors our
Salvor-in-Possession rights to the Titanic. These rights include the exclusive right to recover
artifacts from the wreck site, claim possession of and perhaps title to artifacts recovered from
the site, and display recovered artifacts. Years ago we raised objections to the State Department
regarding the participation of the U.S. in efforts to reach an agreement governing salvage
activities with respect to the Titanic. The United Kingdom signed the treaty in November 2003, and
the U.S. signed the treaty in June 2004. For the treaty to take effect, the U.S. must enact
implementing legislation. As no implementing legislation has been passed, the treaty currently has
no binding legal effect.
10
Table of Contents
The Company has worked with the United States government regarding several draft revisions to
the governments proposed legislation which would implement the Treaty. For years, the U.S.
Department of State and NOAA have been working together to implement the Treaty. For nearly as long
the Company
has opposed the passage of the implementing legislation out of concerns that it failed to
protect the Companys interests in the wreck site and failed to insure continued scientific and
historic exploration.
In early 2010, the Department of State and NOAA resubmitted the draft legislation to Congress.
RMST worked with the United States government to develop a number of textual modifications to the
governments proposed implementing legislation to address the Companys concerns. RMST intends to
support the passage of the implementing legislation into law. The Company believes that the
passage of the legislation as modified by RMST will recognize the Companys past and future role
with regard to the wreck site.
RMST drafted a new section to the legislation which would establish a Titanic Advisory Council
comprised of a member from RMST, NOAA, Department of State, and other key constituents of the deep
sea community to make recommendations to the Commerce Department of the United States government
regarding the protection and preservation of the wreck site through the creation of a long term
site management plan. If passed, it would mark the first law requiring governmental agencies to
work on an advisory council with specific private entities, including a salvor-in-possession, to
jointly protect and oversee the management and protection of a shipwreck. In this respect, the
advisory council would codify into law a formal relationship between the U.S. government and RMST
as the salvor-in-possession and custodian/owner of a collection, to ensure additional oversight and
protection of the wreck site, and to provide recommendations for future protection, preservation,
maintenance and care of the wreck site and collection. Based on the Companys consultations with
NOAA, it is RMSTs expectation that the government will support these specific modifications to the
legislation.
Other Litigation
On July 30, 2009, Sports Immortals, Inc. and its principals, Joel Platt and Jim Platt, filed
an action against the Company in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial District in Palm Beach
County, Florida for claims arising from their license agreement with the Company under which the
Company obtained rights to present sports memorabilia exhibitions utilizing the Sports Immortals,
Inc. collection. The plaintiffs allege that the Company breached the contract when the Company
purported to terminate it several months ago, and they seek fees and stock warrant agreements
required under the agreement. The Company filed its answer and counterclaims on September 7, 2009.
Answering the complaint, the Company denied plaintiffs allegations and maintained that the Sports
Immortals, Inc. license agreement was properly terminated. The Company counterclaimed against the
plaintiffs for breach of contract, fraudulent inducement and misrepresentation, breach of the
covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and violation of Floridas deceptive and unfair practices
act. The litigation is in its early stages of discovery, and the Company intends to vigorously
defend the case and pursue its counterclaims. From time to time the Company is or may become
involved in other legal proceedings that result from the operation of its exhibitions and business.
The Company believes that adequate provisions for resolution of all contingencies, claims and
pending litigation have been made for probable losses and that the ultimate outcome of these
actions will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition.
11
Table of Contents
Proposed Legislation and Government Inquiries
On May 23, 2008, the Company entered into an Assurance of Discontinuance (the Assurance)
with the Attorney General of the State of New York. The Assurance resolves the inquiry initiated
by the Attorney Generals Office regarding our New York City exhibition, Bodies...The Exhibition.
Subject to the provisions of the Assurance, the Company has continued to operate the exhibition in
New York City. Although most of its requirements under the Assurance have now been concluded, the
Company will continue to post certain disclosures regarding the sourcing of the specimens in the
exhibition as long as that exhibition operates in New York City. The Company has voluntarily
agreed to similar disclosures with the states of Washington, Missouri, and Oklahoma.
Legislatures in a few states have considered legislation or passed bills that would restrict
our ability to present human anatomy exhibitions in their states, such as by banning human anatomy
exhibitions, requiring a permit to present such an exhibition, or imposing restrictions on how or
where such exhibitions could be presented. The Company cannot predict whether any such legislation
will be adopted
or, if adopted, how such legislation might affect its ability to conduct human anatomy
exhibitions. Additional states could introduce similar legislation in the future. Any such
legislation could prevent or impose restrictions on the Companys ability to present our human
anatomy exhibitions in the applicable states.
IRS Exams
The IRS has completed its examination of the Companys federal
tax returns for the fiscal years ended 2009, 2008, and 2007 with no adjustments required.
From time to time, the Company has or may receive requests and inquiries from governmental
entities which result from the operation of our exhibitions and business. As a matter of policy,
the Company will cooperate with any such inquiries.
The Company believes that adequate provisions for resolution of all contingencies, claims and
pending litigation have been made for probable losses and that the ultimate outcome of these
actions will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition.
9.
Subsequent Events
During
December 2010, the Company evaluated the performance of all its
recently opened touring exhibitions and determined that the weak
performance of several of the Bodies self-operated shows in unbranded
facilities were well below expectations. Consequently, the Company
elected not to renew some of these leases it holds on collections of
specimens used in seven of its touring Bodies exhibitions.
On
January 11, 2011, the Company announced its intentions to exit
the self-operated Bodies exhibitions and focus on touring Bodies with
promoters and museums, as well as the Titanic exhibitions, Dialog in the Dark and new content. These reductions will result in $4.0 million less of annual fixed license
fees paid for the right to display these specimens, which fees are
included in Cost of revenue when the specimens are displayed.
Additionally, the Company announced its intentions to make reductions
in its staff at its headquarters to achieve savings in General and
administrative costs.
12
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
This report contains information that may constitute forward-looking statements. Generally,
the words believe, expect, intend, estimate, anticipate, project, will and similar
expressions identify forward-looking statements, which generally are not historical in nature.
However, the absence of these words or similar expressions does not mean that a statement is not
forward-looking. All statements that address operating performance, events or developments that we
expect or anticipate will occur in the future including statements relating to volume growth,
share of sales and earnings per share growth, and statements expressing general views about future
operating results are forward-looking statements. Management believes that these
forward-looking statements are reasonable as and when made. However, such statements are dependent
upon, and can be influenced by, a number of external variables over which management has little or
no control, including but not limited to, general economic conditions, public tastes and demand,
competition, the availability of venues, the results of certain legal matters described herein,
governmental regulation and the efforts of co-sponsors and joint venture participants. As a
result, caution should be taken not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements.
Our Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
Forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a guarantee of future performance or
results, nor will they necessarily prove to be accurate indications of the performance that is
ultimately achieved. As a result, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from those
expressed in forward-looking statements.
In this report, the terms Premier Exhibitions, Inc., Company, we, us, and our mean
Premier Exhibitions, Inc. and all entities included in our consolidated financial statements.
You are urged to read the risk factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our
fiscal year ended February 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Except
as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statement for
any reason, even if new information becomes available. The following discussion should be read in
conjunction with the unaudited condensed financial statements and notes appearing elsewhere herein
and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended February 28, 2010.
Overview
Premier Exhibitions, Inc. is in the business of presenting to the public museum-quality
touring exhibitions around the world. For over 17 years, we have created, designed, marketed and
presented educational and entertaining exhibitions. Our unique exhibition products are presented
to the public in exhibition centers, museums, retail locations and other venues with high traffic
such as the Luxor Hotel and Casino, Las Vegas, Nevada. Exhibitions revenue is generated primarily
through admission ticket sales from either self-operated exhibitions or partner managed venues and
through co-production agreements, third-party licensing, and sponsorships.
As of November 30, 2010 we were configured to present three different types of exhibitions, as
reflected in the following table:
Stationary | Touring | Total | ||||||||||
Bodies...The Exhibition and Bodies Revealed |
3 | 11 | 14 | |||||||||
Titanic: The Artifact Exhibiton |
1 | 6 | 7 | |||||||||
Dialog in the Dark |
1 | 0 | 1 | |||||||||
Total Exhibitions |
5 | 17 | 22 | |||||||||
13
Table of Contents
Our touring exhibitions usually span four to six months. The stationary exhibitions are
longer-term engagements which are located in New York, New York, Las Vegas, Nevada, and Atlanta,
Georgia.
As well as developing new content for future exhibitions, the Company continually evaluates
its touring capacity and may expand or contract to suit the addressable market for its content.
Formed in 1987, we first became known for our Titanic exhibitions, which we conduct through
our wholly-owned subsidiary RMS Titanic, Inc. (RMST) and which present the story of the ill-fated
ocean liner, the RMS Titanic (the Titanic). The Titanic has captivated the imaginations of
millions of people throughout the world since 1912 when she struck an iceberg and sank in the North
Atlantic on her maiden voyage approximately 400 miles off the coast of Newfoundland. More than
1,500 of the 2,228 lives on board the Titanic were lost.
We have approximately 5,500 Titanic artifacts to present at our exhibitions. We own
approximately 2,000 of the artifacts raised in 1987. We have a Salvors lien on the remainder of
the artifacts in the amount of 100 percent of the fair market value of the artifacts, which has
been determined by the court with jurisdiction over the case to be approximately $110 million.
Until the court satisfies this lien, either through a judicial sale or the grant of title to the
artifacts to the Company, we have the right to exhibit these artifacts. In 1994, a federal
district court declared us Salvor-in-Possession of the Titanic wreck and wreck site, and, as such,
we have the exclusive right to recover objects from the Titanic wreck site. Through our
explorations, we have obtained and are in possession of the largest collection of authentic data,
information, images and cultural materials associated with the Titanic shipwreck. We believe that
our data, archives and expertise, as well as our Salvor-in-Possession status, put us in the best
position to provide for the archaeological survey, scientific and educational interpretation,
public awareness, historical conservation and stewardship of the Titanic shipwreck. As of November
30, 2010, we had the ability to operate seven concurrent Titanic exhibitions.
In 2004, we diversified our exhibitions beyond the Titanic and into human anatomy by acquiring
licenses that give us rights to present exhibitions of human anatomy sets, each of which contains a
collection of whole human body specimens plus single human organs and body parts.
In 2008, we further expanded our exhibition portfolio when we entered into a long-term license
agreement to present an exhibition series entitled Dialog in the Dark. Our Dialog in the Dark
exhibition is intended to provide visitors with an opportunity to experience the paradox of
learning to see without the use of sight. Visitors are escorted through a series of galleries
immersed in total darkness and challenged to perform tasks without the use of vision. We currently
operate one Dialog in the Dark venue and future expansion is under review.
In the year ending February 28, 2009 (fiscal 2009), the Company began to see a decline in
attendance at both the Bodies and Titanic exhibitions, which adversely impacted earnings. Also,
the Company spent significant capital pursuing new exhibition concepts that never materialized. By
the end of fiscal 2009, with senior members of management leaving the Company and the Company under
significant financial distress, shareholders voted to change the composition of the Board of
Directors. In January of 2009, the new Board terminated the Chief Executive Officer, and installed
new senior management.
14
Table of Contents
During the year ending February 28, 2010 (fiscal 2010), the new Board and senior management
began comprehensive efforts to turn around the profitability of the
Company by restructuring the business and raising capital. Management
reduced the size of the headquarters operations and began
to rationalize the number of Bodies shows touring, reducing touring
capacity in June of 2009 from 16
to 13 concurrent shows, and also negotiated the early termination of the Star Trek exhibition, three
touring shows. Dialog in the Dark was scaled back to only one show installed
long-term in Atlanta. These touring capacity adjustments were made to eliminate
unprofitable shows, and bring capacity in line with the Companys ability to keep
shows touring profitably. Then, the Company issued convertible bonds worth $12 million in order to properly
capitalize the business. During the last two years, management has worked to
mend or end relationships with trade partners that had become strained under the prior
management, including advertising agencies, key relationships with
museums and independent promoters, and members of the Maritime community surrounding the
Titanic. Ending some relationships required capital and significant working capital
was also required to return the Company to trading terms with its key vendors.
In
an effort to further stabilize the Company and grow, management implemented a
process designed to
identify, quantify and manage the risk and returns associated with taking existing exhibitions into
a given market and operate those exhibitions without museums of third party
promoters. In certain cases the self-operated production and
operating model offers the best opportunity for the highest return to
the Company for the presentation of our exhibitions in many markets.
If we believe we can drive strong attendance to the exhibition in a
particular market, we would prefer to own 100 percent of the profit
from that market as opposed to sharing that profit with a museum or
promoter. When attendance is strong, this strategy results in higher
gross margins and profits than with a promoter-run model. However,
this significant upside potential comes with a higher risk to gross
margins when in attendance is weak, as the Company bears the full
cost of the exhibit whether or not attendance meets the forecast.
Management also created a process to evaluate and develop new content that can be used to create new touring exhibitions. Other more generic processes were implemented
to support traditional business decisions ranging from human resources management to financial planning and analysis.
Additionally, managements plan included expanding the Titanic model beyond the exhibition business to broaden the
Companys reach and to capitalize on the ships 100 year anniversary in 2012.
15
Table of Contents
As of November
30, 2010, we had the ability to present 14 concurrent human anatomy exhibitions. Based on the
results of operations for the third quarter of year ending February 28, 2011 (fiscal 2011), in
January 2011, the Company announced its intentions to reduce again the number of touring Bodies
exhibitions. As configured for the first nine months of 2011, 11 of our 14 Bodies shows toured in
largely self-operated, non-branded, temporary exhibits. These specimens are leased or licensed and
are made available to the Company for display at significant cost. With several of the licenses
for these specimens expiring, and considering the recent attendance patterns, management has
determined the best option is to return the specimens to their owner and cease operating these
exhibits. Doing so will result in a significant reduction in fixed operating costs related to 7 of
the current 11 touring Bodies shows within six months. The remaining inventory of specimens has a
lower fixed carrying cost and will be toured increasingly in conjunction with museums and
promoters. In connection with the reduction in Bodies touring capacity, the Company will reduce
general and administrative expenses, and focus its human and financial capital on
the profitable parts of its operations in addition to new content.
Due to both the lack of historical investment in the core business as well as the scope and
breadth of our initiatives themselves, we will require between
$6.0 million and $7.0 million of capital
investment during fiscal 2011. Through November 30, 2010,
approximately $5.0 million has been spent
on these initiatives, the majority of which has been capitalized in
the 2010 Expedition Titanic Dive costs of $3.9 million. We estimate cash on hand and cash
flows from operations will be adequate to fund these remaining initiatives.
Our principal executive offices are located at 3340 Peachtree Road, NE, Suite 900, Atlanta,
Georgia 30326 and our telephone number is (404) 842-2600. We are a Florida corporation and
maintain websites located at www.prxi.com, www.rmstitanic.net, www.expeditiontitanic.com
www.bodiestheexhibition.com, www.bodiestickets.com, www.titanictix.com, and www.bodiesrevealed.com.
Information on our websites is not part of this report.
Our Exhibitions
Titanic: The Artifact Exhibition
By featuring the artifacts recovered from the wreck site, our exhibitions tell the Titanics
story from construction through her sinking, discovery and conservation. These objects are placed
in historically correct re-creations of the significant rooms onboard the ship and are illuminated
by moving stories of her passengers and crew. Approximately 20 million visitors have attended our
Titanic exhibitions at venues throughout the world, including in the United States (U.S.),
Canada, Czech Republic, Germany, Norway, France, Greece, Japan, Switzerland, Chile, Argentina,
China, Mexico, Hungary, South Korea, Spain, United Kingdom and Australia.
16
Table of Contents
Titanic Expeditions
Titanic Ventures Limited Partnership (TVLP), a Connecticut limited partnership, was formed
in 1987 for the purposes of exploring the wreck of the Titanic and the surrounding oceanic areas.
In August 1987, TVLP contracted with the Institute of France for the Research and Exploration of
the Sea (IFREMER) to conduct an expedition and dive to the wreck of the Titanic. Approximately
2,000 objects were recovered and 140 hours of video tape footage and an estimated seven thousand
still photographs were taken during the course of the 32 dives in that original expedition. A
French maritime tribunal subsequently conveyed to us title to these artifacts. In 1993, RMST
acquired all of the assets and assumed all of the liabilities of TVLP. In July 2004, the U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia concluded that such conveyance by the French
tribunal was not valid and sought to deprive us of title to these artifacts. We appealed that
decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. On January 31, 2006, the Court of
Appeals reversed and vacated the ruling of the lower court. This decision reaffirmed the validity
of our title to the approximately 2,000 artifacts recovered during the 1987 expedition.
We completed additional expeditions to the wreck of the Titanic in 1994, 1996, 1998, 2000 and
2004 recovering approximately 3,500 additional artifacts and additional video tape footage and
still photographs. With the depth of the Titanic wreck approximately two and one-half miles below
the surface of the North Atlantic Ocean, our ability to conduct expeditions to the Titanic has been
subject to the availability of necessary research and recovery vessels and equipment for chartering
by us from June to September, which is the open weather window for such activities.
2010 Expedition to Titanic Wreck Site
During August and September 2010, our wholly owned subsidiary RMST, as
Salvor-In-Possession of the Titanic and its wreck site, conducted an expedition
to the Titanic wreck site 25 years after its discovery to develop a comprehensive archaeological
map of the wreck site utilizing state-of-the-art high definition 2D and 3D cameras and sonar scans.
RMST brought together an alliance of the worlds leading archaeologists, oceanographers and
scientists together with U.S. governmental agencies to join RMST in the 2010 expedition to the
wreck site and the post-expedition scientific study. This alliance included the Woods Hole
Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), the Institute of Nautical Archaeology (INA), the National Oceanic
Atmospheric Administrations Office of the National Marine Sanctuaries (NOAA/ONMS), The National
Park Services Submerged Resources Center (NPS) and the Waitt Institute. Never before had all of
these entities partnered to work together on one project.
The general purpose of the expedition was to collect and interpret scientific data for the
long-term protection and management of Titanic. The collected information, including 2D and 3D
moving imagery, sonar imagery and other data, will be used to educate and enlighten future
generations and will be added to the Companys proprietary collection of Titanic artifacts. This
information will provide the basis for an archaeological site plan of the wreck site, and
ultimately a comprehensive long-term site management plan. The work product of the dive also has
commercial value for public consumption through various distribution channels including movie
theatres, our traveling museum exhibitions, straight to home DVD release, and retail merchandise
sales in our stores, online and through wholesale and licensing. We have sole legal ownership of
the footage taken during the entire expedition. Accordingly, the Company has recorded $3.9 million
in long-term assets related to costs incurred to obtain the film footage and still images during
the expedition, as well as the establishment of a web point of presence for the expedition,
www.expeditiontitanic.com, which allowed visitors to the site to participate in the dive as it was
in process.
The
costs incurred and capitalized on the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets as of November 30, 2010 are summarized as follows:
Ship charter
costs, underwater
equipment and filming |
$ | 2,935,211 | ||
General
management |
635,270 | |||
Titanic
Preservation Alliance point of presence |
316,997 | |||
Total
historical costs capitalized |
$ | 3,887,478 | ||
The Company has not completed the assignment and allocation of costs to specific assets as of
November 30, 2010, as it is currently evaluating the quality of the output and consulting with
third parties to determine highest and best uses, budgeted costs, and timelines to completion of
each asset in order to place them in service.
In addition to the alliance described above, we have long standing relationships with several
other archaeologists and conservators for services to aid in stewardship of the Titanic wreck site.
Upon recovery from the Titanic wreck site, artifacts are in varying states of deterioration.
Having been submerged in the ocean for almost 100 years, artifacts have been subjected to the
corrosive effects of seawater. The conservation of all artifacts recovered from the wreck site of
the Titanic is an extensive process that employs many techniques in order to stabilize them for
display in our exhibitions. We own and maintain
an extensive database, together with digital and photographic archives, that establish, with
certainty, the origin of the artifacts.
17
Table of Contents
Bodies...The Exhibition and Bodies Revealed
We presently have the right to display multiple human anatomy sets, each of which contains a
collection of whole human body specimens plus single human organs and body parts, which are known
as Bodies Revealed and Bodies...The Exhibition. We secured the rights to produce these
exhibitions through separate exhibition agreements.
These specimens are assembled into anatomy-based exhibitions featuring preserved human bodies,
organs and body parts to offer the public an opportunity to view the intricacies and complexities
of the human body. The exhibitions include displays of dissected human bodies which are
permanently preserved through a process called polymer preservation, also known as plastination. In
essence, the bodies are drained of all fat and fluids, which are replaced with polymers such as
silicone rubber, epoxy and polyester. This preserves the flesh and maintains its natural look.
Skin from the bodies is removed, or partially removed, to reveal musculoskeletal, nervous,
circulatory, and reproductive or digestive systems. The full body specimens are complimented by
presentation cases of related individual organs and body parts, both healthy and diseased, that
provide a detailed look into the elements that comprise each system. Using more than 200
specimens, each exhibition follows a systems-based approach to human anatomy which examines our
skeletal, muscular, nervous, digestive, respiratory, circulatory, urinary, integumentary (skin,
sweat glands, hair, and nails), and reproductive systems.
Our full-body specimens and individual organs were obtained through plastination facilities
mostly in China. The full body specimens are persons who lived in China and died from natural
causes. Most of the bodies were unclaimed at death, and were ultimately delivered to medical
schools for education and research. Where known, information about the identities, medical history
and causes of death is kept strictly confidential. China has a large and highly competent group of
anatomists and dissectors, who are essential to properly preparing these specimens for exhibition
and educational purposes. In a number of cases, our medical director has been able to identify
medical problems that were present in an organ and, where appropriate, those organs were clearly
labeled in the exhibitions. For example, an emphysema-diseased lung is displayed and identified,
giving the visitors a visual understanding of the effects of the disease.
Dialog in the Dark
In 2008, we expanded our exhibition portfolio when we entered into a long-term license
agreement to present an exhibition series entitled Dialog in the Dark. Our Dialog in the Dark
exhibition is intended to provide insight and experience to the paradox of learning to see
without the use of sight. Small groups of visitors navigate this exhibition, with the help of
their visually impaired guide, through a series of galleries immersed in total darkness and are
challenged to perform tasks without the use of vision. We currently operate one Dialog in the
Dark venue and future expansion is under review.
Other Exhibitions
During our first fiscal quarter of 2011, we advanced approximately $300 thousand to a licensor
for the right to develop, present and promote additional exhibitions, which are currently under
development. This right is being considered by the Company through a joint venture arrangement
with Michael Cohls promotional firm, S2BN Entertainment Corporation (S2BN), in which the Company
and S2BN each own 50 percent of the joint venture and will share equally in the funding
requirements and profits and losses of the joint venture exhibitions. We intend to acquire,
develop and present additional new exhibitions for presentation in the future, including
exhibitions both related and unrelated to our currently ongoing exhibitions.
Merchandising
We earn revenue from the sale of merchandise, such as apparel, posters and Titanic-related
jewelry (some of which utilizes coal we have recovered from the shipwreck). In addition, we also
publish exhibition catalogs and provide ancillary services such as audio tours and photographs,
which are sold at
our exhibition gift shops. We intend to continue to focus on merchandising activities at all
our exhibition locations to increase revenue per attendee and our margins on these sales. During
the second quarter of 2011 we launched an e-commerce website that allows us to sell merchandise
related to our shows over the internet.
18
Table of Contents
Information Regarding Exhibitions Outside the United States
Our exhibitions tour regularly outside the U.S. Approximately 15 percent of our revenues and
52 percent of attendance for the quarter ended November 30, 2010 compared with 14 percent and 31
percent for the quarter ended November 30, 2009 resulted from exhibition activities outside the
U.S. Many of our financial arrangements in locations outside of the U.S. are based upon foreign
currencies, and therefore we are exposed to the risk of currency fluctuations between the U.S.
dollar and the currencies of the countries in which our exhibitions are touring. See Risk Factors
and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk in this report for more
information.
The Quarter Ended November 30, 2010 Compared to the Quarter Ended November 30, 2009
Revenue. During the quarter ended November 30, 2010, total revenue increased by $1.5 million
or 17% to $10.2 million compared to the same quarter last year primarily due to higher admission
revenues.
Exhibition revenue of $8.9 million increased by $1.0 million driven by an increase in
exhibition days, self-run exhibitions, and overall attendance during the quarter ended November 30,
2010 compared to the same quarter of last year. Total exhibition days, which is the total number
of days our exhibitions were open to the public, increased to 1,613 for the three months ended
November 30, 2010 compared to 1,361 for the same period last year. This increase in exhibition
days was largely accomplished by having our touring capacity booked fully to 31 venues in the third
quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to having part of our exhibits in storage in the third quarter
of fiscal 2010. Revenue from self-run exhibitions was 92% and 77% of revenue for the third
quarters of fiscal year 2011 and fiscal year 2010, respectively. Total attendance for the three
months ended November 30, 2010 increased by 152,862 from 819,941 for the same quarter last year
driven by an increase in exhibition days. Average attendance per exhibition day remained stable,
with attendance at many of our touring Bodies exhibitions hovering
below break-even gross margin
levels, while other locations, like our longer-term exhibitions in
Las Vegas and most of the touring Titanic shows, continue to reflect
strong or even increased attendance.
Merchandise and other revenue increased $0.5 million to $1.3 million for the quarter ended
November 30, 2010. This increase is primarily the result of improved sales of photographs, music,
and printed materials in conjunction with the overall increase in exhibition days in the period as
well as higher attendance at our exhibitions during the third quarter of 2011.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
November 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Exhibition revenue |
||||||||
Admissions revenue |
$ | 8.3 | $ | 6.9 | ||||
Non-refundable license fees for current exhibitions |
0.6 | 1.0 | ||||||
Total exhibition revenues |
8.9 | 7.9 | ||||||
Merchandise and other |
1.3 | 0.8 | ||||||
Total revenue |
$ | 10.2 | $ | 8.7 | ||||
Key non-financial measures |
||||||||
Number of venues presented |
31 | 26 | ||||||
Operating days |
1,613 | 1,361 | ||||||
Attendance (in thousands) |
973 | 820 | ||||||
Average attendance per operating day |
603 | 602 |
Cost of revenue. Our total cost of revenue increased by $4.6 million or 76% to $10.7 million
compared to the same quarter of last year, primarily due to the rise in self-run exhibitions where
the Company incurred all costs compared to only minor costs for co-produced or third party licensed
exhibitions operated by partners. Self-run exhibitions increased from 8 to 19 for the quarter
ended November 30, 2010 versus the same quarter last year.
19
Table of Contents
Cost of merchandise sold remained stable at $0.3 million for both of the quarters ended
November 30, 2010 and 2009.
Gross (loss) profit. During the quarter ended November 30, 2010, our gross profit decreased
by $3.0 million, as in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 we generated a gross loss of $0.4 million
compared to a gross profit of $2.6 million for the same quarter of last year. Our gross profit was
down due to generating lower revenue per exhibition day coupled with higher operating costs
associated with additional self-operated exhibitions.
Our merchandise gross profit increased by $0.6 million with gross profit margin increasing to
73% compared to 55%. This increase in gross profit reflects increased merchandise sales over more
exhibition days than the prior quarter of last year and the ability to maintain stable cost of
merchandise sold.
Operating expenses. Our general and administrative expenses of $4.6 million remained stable
for both the quarters ended November 30, 2010 and 2009. However, during the current quarter
operating expenses decreased due to lower stored exhibits expense and lower legal, accounting and
consulting fees of $0.3 and $0.5, respectively. This decline in expense was offset by higher bad
debt expense and higher office and other expenses of $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively
for the quarter ended November 30, 2010.
Our depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $0.2 million to $1.2 million. The
decrease in depreciation expense is primarily attributable to lower amortization expense, on
licenses that are now fully depreciated, partially offset by increased amortization and
depreciation expense on newly acquired licenses and other fixed assets.
Loss from operations. We realized a loss from operations of $6.3 million as compared to $3.4
million for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 as the increase in revenue and the decline in
operating expense was more than offset by higher exhibition costs.
Benefit from income taxes. We recorded an income tax benefit of $0.5 million for the three
months ended November 30, 2010 versus a tax benefit of $1.3 million for the same period in the
prior year. The current period tax benefit reflects the release of the liability for uncertain tax
positions, net of the deferred tax impact, as a result of the conclusion of IRS examinations, as
well as beneficial adjustments for an amended state return. In fiscal 2011, the Company ceased
recording the Federal income tax benefit of net tax losses; therefore there is no provision for
Federal taxes included in the current tax benefit, whereas the prior period tax benefit was
primarily related to Federal taxes.
Net loss. We realized a net loss of $5.7 million as compared to a net loss of $2.2 million for
the same period last year.
Loss per share. Basic and diluted loss per common share for the quarters ended November 30,
2010 and 2009 was $0.12 and $0.05, respectively. The basic and fully diluted weighted average
shares outstanding for the quarters ended November 30, 2010 and 2009 were 46,913,601 and 41,019,416
shares, respectively.
The Nine Months Ended November 30, 2010 Compared to the Nine Months Ended November 30, 2009
Revenue. During the period ended November 30, 2010, total revenue increased by $1.9 million or
6% to $35.0 million as compared to the same period of the prior year primarily due to higher
admission revenues.
20
Table of Contents
Exhibition revenue of $31.7 million increased by $1.4 million driven by an increase in
self-run exhibitions and exhibition days during the nine months ended November 30, 2010 compared to
the same period of last year, partially offset by lower overall attendance. Total exhibition days,
which is the total number of days our exhibitions were open to the public, remained stable at 4,684
for the nine months ended November 30, 2010 compared to 4,624 for the same period last year.
Revenue from self-run exhibitions was 78% and 30% of revenue for the nine months of fiscal year
2011 and fiscal year 2010, respectively. Total attendance for the nine months ended November 30,
2010 decreased by 403,828 from 3,306,979 for the same period last year, reflecting the closing of 3
exhibitions that are no longer presented by the Company, as well as lower attendance at our Bodies
and Titanic exhibits. Average attendance per exhibition day decreased 13 percent, with attendance
at many of our touring Bodies exhibitions hovering below break-even gross margin levels, while other
locations, like our longer-term exhibitions in Las Vegas and most of
the touring Titanic shows, continuing to reflect strong or even
increased attendance.
Merchandise and other revenue increased by $0.5 million or 17% to $3.2 million. This increase
is primarily the result of improved sales of photographs, music, and printed materials in
conjunction with the overall increase in exhibition days during the nine months ended November 30,
2010.
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
November 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Exhibition revenue |
||||||||
Admissions revenue |
$ | 28.4 | $ | 25.6 | ||||
Non-refundable license fees for current exhibitions |
3.3 | 4.7 | ||||||
Total exhibition revenues |
31.7 | 30.3 | ||||||
Merchandise and other |
3.3 | 2.8 | ||||||
Total revenue |
$ | 35.0 | $ | 33.1 | ||||
Key non-financial measures |
||||||||
Number of venues presented |
31 | 36 | ||||||
Operating days |
4,684 | 4,624 | ||||||
Attendance (in thousands) |
2,903 | 3,307 | ||||||
Average attendance per operating day |
620 | 715 |
Cost of revenue. Our total cost of revenue for the nine months ended November 30, 2010
increased by $9.2 million or 59% to $25.8 million compared to the same period of last year,
primarily due to the rise in self-run exhibitions where the Company incurred all costs compared to
only minor costs for co-produced or third party licensed exhibitions operated by partners.
Self-run exhibitions increased from 8 to 21 for the nine months ended November 30, 2010 versus the
same period last year.
Cost of merchandise sold remained stable at $0.8 million for both of the nine months ended
November 30, 2010 and 2009.
Gross profit. During the nine months ended November 30, 2010, our gross profit decreased by
$7.4 million or 44% to $9.2 million as compared to the same period of last year. Our gross profit
was down due to the overall decline in attendance combined with higher operating costs associated
with additional self-operated exhibitions.
Our merchandise gross profit increased by $0.4 million with gross profit margin increasing to
73% compared to 71%. This increase in gross profit reflects increased merchandise sales over more
exhibition days than the prior quarter of last year and the ability to maintain stable costs of
merchandise sold.
Operating expenses. Our total operating expenses of $17.2 million decreased by $11.0 million
as compared to the same period last year primarily due to impairment expense of $4.5 million, a
decline in
amortization and depreciation expense of $0.6 million, and lower general and administrative
expenses of $5.9 million.
Our impairment expense decreased primarily to an impairment of goodwill and intangible assets
in fiscal 2010 of $4.5 million. General and administrative expenses declined primarily due to
lower stored exhibits expense, bad debt expense, and legal, accounting and consulting fees of $1.0
million, $1.4 million, and $3.2 million, respectively.
21
Table of Contents
Our depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $0.6 million to $3.7 million primarily
attributable to lower amortization expense, as certain licenses are now fully depreciated,
partially offset by increased amortization and depreciation expense on newly acquired licenses and
other fixed assets.
Loss from operations. We realized a loss from operations of $8.0 million as compared to $11.7
million for the same period last year as the increase in revenues coupled with the decline in
operating expense, including the reduction due to impairments incurred in the prior period, offset
higher exhibition costs.
Benefit from income taxes. We recorded an income tax benefit of $0.5 million for the nine
months ended November 30, 2010 versus a tax benefit of $3.5 million for the same period in the
prior year. The current period tax benefit reflects the release of the liability for uncertain tax
positions, net of the deferred tax impact, as a result of the conclusion of IRS examinations, as
well as beneficial adjustments for an amended state return, partially offset by taxes paid in
states where we do not have the benefit of net operating loss carryforwards. In fiscal 2011, the
Company ceased recording the Federal income tax benefit of net tax losses; therefore there is no
provision for Federal taxes included in the current tax benefit, whereas the prior period tax
benefit was primarily related to Federal taxes.
Net loss. We realized a net loss of $7.3 million as compared to a net loss of $8.5 million for
the same period last year.
Loss per share. Basic and fully diluted loss per common share for the nine months ended
November 30, 2010 and 2009 was $0.16 and $0.25, respectively. The basic and fully diluted weighted
average shares outstanding for the nine months ended November 30, 2010 and 2009 were 46,873,879 and
33,617,517 shares, respectively.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following tables show selected information about our cash flows during the nine months
ended November 30, 2010 and 2009 and selected balance sheet data as of November, 2010 and February 28,
2010 (in thousands):
Selected cash flow information:
As of | ||||||||
Nine Months Ended November 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
$ | (898 | ) | $ | (6,299 | ) | ||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(2,912 | ) | (3,509 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(19 | ) | 12,261 | |||||
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(181 | ) | 22 | |||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | (4,010 | ) | $ | 2,475 | |||
Selected balance sheet data:
As of | ||||||||
November 30, | February 28, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 6,329 | $ | 10,339 | ||||
Marketable securities |
803 | 3,308 | ||||||
Working capital |
5,176 | 14,909 | ||||||
Total assets |
37,296 | 43,751 | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
24,511 | 31,648 |
22
Table of Contents
Operating Activities.
For the nine months ended November 30, 2010, cash used by operations was $0.9 million,
compared to $6.3 million period ended November, 2009.
The following table sets forth our working capital (current assets less current liabilities)
balances and our current ratio (current assets/current liabilities) at November 30, 2010 and
February 28, 2010.
As of | ||||||||
November 30, | February 28, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
Working Capital (in millions) |
$ | 5.2 | $ | 14.9 | ||||
Current Ratio |
1.55 | 3.06 |
Investing Activities. Cash used in investing activities was $3.0 million for the nine months
ended November 30, 2010 compared to $3.5 million for the nine months ended November 30, 2009. Of
the cash used by investing activities for the nine months ended November 30, 2010 the majority was
used to fund the 2010 Titanic expedition ($3.9 million) and to purchase fixed assets ($1.6
million). These expenditures were partially offset by $2.6 million in cash generated from the sale
of marketable securities.
Financing Activities. Cash used in financing activities was $0.02 million for the nine months
ended November 30, 2010 compared to $12.2 million for the nine months ended November 30, 2009. In
the prior period we issued $12.0 million worth of convertible notes which were convertible into
shares of our common stock.
Capital requirements. We believe that our expected cash flows from operations together with
our existing cash will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for working capital
requirements, debt obligations and capital expenditures for the next 12 months. If cash generated
from operations with our existing cash is insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, we
may seek additional financing, which could include the issuance of equity or debt securities. The
sale of equity or convertible debt securities could result in additional dilution to our
shareholders. Additional indebtedness would result in increased fixed obligations and could result
in operating covenants that would restrict our operations. We cannot assure that financing will be
available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, or at all.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet financial arrangements.
Contractual Obligations
Based on our performance, we do not have access to the Credit Facility we previously had with
Bank of America, as previously disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2010.
Critical Accounting Policies
There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies as disclosed in our
Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended February 28, 2010.
Contractual Obligations
There have been no material changes to our contractual obligations as disclosed in our Annual
Report filed on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended February 28, 2010.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial position due to adverse
changes in financial market prices and rates. Market risk exposure is primarily a result of
fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We do not hold or issue
financial instruments for trading purposes.
23
Table of Contents
Interest Rate Risk
Interest income on our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments is subject to
interest rate fluctuations, but we believe that the impact of these fluctuations does not have a
material effect on our financial position due to the short-term nature of any such investments. We
currently do not have any outstanding borrowings. Our interest income is most sensitive to the
general level of interest rates in the United States Sensitivity analysis which is used to measure
our interest rate risk. For the nine months ended November 30, 2010, a 100 basis-point adverse
change in interest rates would not have had a material effect on our consolidated financial
position, earnings or cash flow.
Foreign Currency Risk
We conduct a portion of our business activities outside of the U.S., and are thereby exposed
to the risk of currency fluctuations between the U.S. dollar (USD) and foreign currencies of the
countries in which we are conducting business. If the value of the USD decreases in relation to
such foreign currencies, our potential revenue from exhibition and merchandising activities, as
well as cash balances held in foreign currencies outside of the U.S. will be adversely affected.
During the nine months ended November 30, 2010, we did not incur any material losses because of
changes in the exchange rates with respect to foreign currencies, although the impact of changes in
exchange rates was greater for the three months ended November 30, 2010, as our Bodies exhibit in
London opened in November 2010. Although our financial arrangements with foreign parties may be
based upon foreign currencies, we have sought, and will continue to seek where practicable, to make
our financial commitments and understandings based upon the USD in order to minimize the adverse
potential effect of currency fluctuations.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President
and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, our management has evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered
by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our President and Chief Executive
Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the period
covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Information presented in PART I of this FORM 10-Q is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
The Company is party to an ongoing salvage case titled RMS Titanic, Inc. v. The Wrecked and
Abandoned Vessel, et al., in rem. The Company has maintained its status as sole
Salvor-in-Possession of the Titanic wreck site and is awaiting an interim salvage award, in the
form of title to the recovered Titanic artifacts or a monetary award, as discussed in detail in
Note 6 to this Form 10-Q, Legal Proceedings and Contingencies. The District Court held an
evidentiary hearing from October 26, 2009 through November 2, 2009 on our motion for a salvage
award. On August 12, 2010, the District Court issued an opinion granting a salvage award to RMS
Titanic, Inc. based upon the Companys work in recovering and conserving over 3,000 artifacts from
the wreck of Titanic during its expeditions conducted in 1993, 1994, 1996, 1998, 2000, and 2004.
The Company was awarded 100 percent of the fair market value of the artifacts, which the Court set
at approximately $110 million. The Court has reserved the right to determine the manner in which to
pay the award. It will determine by August 15, 2011, whether to pay the Company a cash award from
proceeds derived from a judicial sale, or in the alternative, to issue the Company an award of
title to the artifacts with certain covenants and conditions which would govern their maintenance
and future disposition.
24
Table of Contents
The U.S. Department of State, or State Department, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) of the U.S. Department of Commerce are working together to implement an
international treaty with the governments of the United Kingdom, France and Canada concerning the
Titanic wreck site. As discussed in detail in Note 6 to this Form 10-Q, Legal Proceedings and
Contingencies, for the treaty to take effect, the U.S. must enact implementing legislation. As no
implementing legislation has been passed, the treaty currently has no binding legal effect.
Several months ago the Department of State and NOAA resubmitted the draft legislation to Congress.
RMST worked with the United States government to develop a number of textual modifications to the
governments proposed implementing legislation to address the Companys concerns. RMST intends to
support the passage of the implementing legislation into law. The Company believes that the
passage of the legislation as modified by RMST will recognize the Companys past and future role
with regard to the wreck site.
RMST drafted a new section to the legislation which would establish a Titanic Advisory Council
comprised of a member from RMST, NOAA, Department of State, and other key constituents of the deep
sea community to make recommendations to the Commerce Department of the United States government
regarding the protection and preservation of the wreck site through the creation of a long term
site management plan. If passed, it would mark the first law requiring governmental agencies to
work on an advisory council with specific private entities, including a salvor-in-possession, to
jointly protect and oversee the management and protection of a shipwreck. In this respect, the
advisory council would codify into law a formal relationship between the United States government
and RMST as the salvor-in-possession
and custodian/owner of a collection, to ensure additional oversight and protection of the
wreck site, and to provide recommendations for future protection, preservation, maintenance and
care of the wreck site and collection. Based on the Companys consultations with NOAA, it is
RMSTs expectation that the government will support these specific modifications to the
legislation.
On July 30, 2009, Sports Immortals, Inc. and its principals, Joel Platt and Jim Platt, filed
an action against us in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial District in Palm Beach County,
Florida for claims arising from their license agreement with us under which we obtained rights to
present sports memorabilia exhibitions utilizing the Sports Immortals, Inc. collection. The
plaintiffs allege that we breached the contract when we purported to terminate it several months
ago, and they seek fees and stock warrant agreements required under the agreement. We filed our
answer and counterclaims on September 7, 2009. Answering the complaint, we denied plaintiffs
allegations and maintained that the Sports Immortals, Inc. license agreement was properly
terminated. We counterclaimed against the plaintiffs for breach of contract, fraudulent inducement
and misrepresentation, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and violation of
Floridas deceptive and unfair practices act. The litigation is in its early stages of discovery,
and we intend to vigorously defend the case and pursue our counterclaims.
There have been no other material changes in the legal proceedings discussed in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2010.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
For a complete list of our Risk Factors, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
our fiscal year ended February 28, 2010. During the nine months ended November 30, 2010, there
were no material changes to our Risk Factors other than the changes noted below. You should
consider carefully the Risk Factors. If any of these risks actually occur, our business, financial
condition or results of operations would likely suffer. In that case, the trading price of our
common stock could decline, and you may lose all or a part of the money you paid to buy our common
stock.
25
Table of Contents
The plans of our largest shareholder to sell his block of common stock could have an effect on
our stock price and could result in changes to the strategic direction of the Company.
The Companys largest shareholder, Sellers Capital Master Fund, Ltd. (SCF), informed the
Company that at the request of the funds investors it intended to return all capital to them. When
SCF initially reached this decision in June 2010, it had planned to attempt to locate a single
purchaser for the funds 46 percent equity investment in Premiers common stock over the next 12 to
18 months. On October 7, 2010 Mark Sellers, Chairman of the Board of Premier Exhibitions, Inc. and
Managing General Partner of Sellers Capital, informed the Company that Sellers Capital is no longer
marketing its 46 percent ownership stake in Premier, and further that Sellers Capital no longer
has a specific time frame within which to sell its stake in Premier. Instead, Mr. Sellers
indicated that Sellers Capital would retain its shares in the Company until such time as it could
obtain what he believes to be a better value for the shares.
At the request of the Board and Mr. Sellers, a committee of the Board engaged its investment
banker to attempt to locate an appropriate buyer for the funds equity investment who will commit
to the multi-year plan presented to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia,
Norfolk Division, in November 2009 regarding expanding the Companys role as trustee of the Titanic
wreck site in conjunction with the ongoing litigation described under Legal Proceedings in this Form
10-Q. Management does recognize, however, that if a suitable buyer is not identified, Mr. Sellers
may choose to take another course of action, including potentially selling his shares in the open
market or in a privately negotiated transaction or distributing the SCF shares to his limited
partners.
The plans of our largest shareholder to sell his block of common stock could have an effect on
our stock price and could result in changes to the strategic direction of the Company. The
announcement will not likely result in a change in the Companys ownership in the short term, but
could serve to destabilize the trading price of our common stock in the short term. In addition, a
single purchaser of the 46 percent block of common stock could also acquire effective control of
the Company. Such a shareholder may not agree with the present strategic direction of the board of
directors and management, creating uncertainty that the current strategic focus of the Company will
continue over the longer term.
We may not be granted a salvage award that is commensurate with the efforts we have expended
to recover items from the Titanic wreck site or may be prohibited from exhibiting certain of the
Titanic artifacts already under our control.
In November 2007, we filed a motion with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Virginia, Norfolk Division seeking an interim salvage award to compensate us for our efforts in
recovering certain items from the wreck of the Titanic. The court has recently granted us a salvage
award based on the fair market value of the artifacts recovered, however, the court has until
August 2011 to determine whether to satisfy the award by a payment in cash or by an in specie
award, which would grant us title to the artifacts. As a result, the form of the award is
uncertain. Our future plans for our Titanic exhibitions and for expenditures to develop other
exhibition properties will depend, in part, on the decision of the court. Our ability or inability
to put any cash or in specie award to its best use may affect our results of operations and
financial condition.
26
Table of Contents
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Maximum number | ||||||||||||||||
(or approximate | ||||||||||||||||
Total number of | dollar value) of | |||||||||||||||
shares (or units) | shares (or units) that | |||||||||||||||
Total number of | purchased as part of | may yet be | ||||||||||||||
shares (or units) | Average price paid | publicly announced | purchased under the | |||||||||||||
Period | purchased | per share (or unit) | plans or programs(1) | plans or programs(1) | ||||||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | |||||||||||||
July 1, 2010 through July 31, 2010 |
14,367 | $ | 1.18 | 14,367 | 985,633 | |||||||||||
August 1, 2010 through August 31, 2010 |
100,714 | $ | 1.15 | 100,714 | 884,919 | |||||||||||
Total |
115,081 | 115,081 |
(1) | On July 29, 2010, the Company announced the share repurchase program, pursuant to which up to 1
million shares of common stock can be repurchased through July 28, 2011. |
Item 6. Exhibits.
See Index to Exhibits on page 29 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
27
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PREMIER EXHIBITIONS, INC. |
||||
Dated: January 14, 2011 | By: | /s/ Christopher J. Davino | ||
Christopher J. Davino, | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | ||||
Dated: January 14, 2011 | By: | /s/ John A. Stone | ||
John A. Stone, | ||||
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
28
Table of Contents
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit | Filed | Incorporated by Reference | ||||||||||
No. | Exhibit Description | Herewith | Form | Exhibit | Filing Date | |||||||
10.1 | Premier Exhibitions, Inc. Annual Incentive Plan
|
8-K | 10.1 | 11/23/2010 | ||||||||
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of President and Chief
Executive Officer
|
X | ||||||||||
31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial
|
X | ||||||||||
32.1 | Section 1350 Certifications
|
X |
29