Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - BELK INC | g25426exv32w2.htm |
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - BELK INC | g25426exv32w1.htm |
EX-10.1 - EX-10.1 - BELK INC | g25426exv10w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - BELK INC | g25426exv31w2.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - BELK INC | g25426exv31w1.htm |
EX-10.2 - EX-10.2 - BELK INC | g25426exv10w2.htm |
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the quarterly period ended October 30, 2010
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number 000-26207
BELK, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
Delaware | 56-2058574 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2801 West Tyvola Road, Charlotte, NC | 28217-4500 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants Telephone Number, including Area Code (704) 357-1000
N/A
Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
At November 30, 2010, the registrant had issued and outstanding 45,411,168 shares of class A common
stock and 932,766 shares of class B common stock.
BELK, INC.
Index to Form 10-Q
Index to Form 10-Q
Page | ||||
Number | ||||
4 | ||||
4 | ||||
5 | ||||
6 | ||||
7 | ||||
8 | ||||
13 | ||||
18 | ||||
18 | ||||
19 | ||||
19 | ||||
19 | ||||
19 | ||||
19 | ||||
19 | ||||
19 |
2
This Report Contains Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements made in this report, and other written or oral statements made by or on
behalf of the Company, may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
federal securities laws. Statements regarding future events and developments and the Companys
future performance, as well as our expectations, beliefs, plans, estimates or projections relating
to the future, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of these laws. You can identify
these forward-looking statements through our use of words such as may, will, intend,
project, expect, anticipate, believe, estimate, continue or other similar words.
Forward-looking statements include information concerning possible or assumed future results
from merchandising, marketing and advertising in our stores and through the Internet, general
economic conditions, our ability to be competitive in the retail industry, our ability to execute
profitability and efficiency strategies, our ability to execute growth strategies, anticipated
benefits from our strategic initiative to strengthen our merchandising and planning organizations,
anticipated benefits from the redesign of our belk.com website and our eCommerce fulfillment
center, the expected benefit of new systems and technology, anticipated benefits from our
acquisitions, the anticipated benefit under our Program Agreement with GE, and customer response to
our re-branding. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties
that may cause our actual results to differ significantly from the results we discuss in such
forward-looking statements.
We believe that these forward-looking statements are reasonable. However, you should not place
undue reliance on such statements. Any such forward-looking statements are qualified by the
following important risk factors and other risks which may be disclosed from time to time in our
filings that could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted by the
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements relate to the date initially made, and we
undertake no obligation to update them.
Risks and uncertainties that might cause our results to differ from those we project in our
forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
| General economic, political and business conditions, nationally and in our market areas,
including rates of economic growth, interest rates, inflation or deflation, consumer credit
availability, levels of consumer debt and bankruptcies, tax rates and policy, unemployment
trends, potential acts of terrorism and threats of such acts and other matters that influence
consumer confidence and spending; |
| Our ability to comply with debt covenants which could adversely affect our capital
resources, financial condition and liquidity and our ability to re-finance existing debt as
necessary on acceptable terms; |
| Our ability to anticipate the demands of our customers for a wide variety of merchandise
and services, including our predictions about the merchandise mix, quality, style, service,
convenience and credit availability of our customers; |
| Customer response to our re-branding; |
| Unseasonable and extreme weather conditions in our market areas; |
| Seasonal fluctuations in quarterly net income due to the significant portion of our
revenues generated during the holiday season in the fourth fiscal quarter and the significant
amount of inventory we carry during that time; |
| Competition from other department and specialty stores and other retailers, including
luxury goods retailers, general merchandise stores, Internet retailers, mail order retailers
and off-price and discount stores, in the areas of price, merchandise mix, quality, style,
service, convenience, credit availability and advertising; |
| Our ability to effectively use advertising, marketing and promotional campaigns to generate
high customer traffic in our stores; |
| Our ability to find qualified vendors from which to source our merchandise and our ability
to access products in a timely and efficient manner from a wide variety of domestic and
international vendors; |
| The income we receive from, and the timing of receipt of, payments from GE, the operator of
our private label credit card business, which depends upon the amount of purchases made
through the proprietary credit cards, the level of finance charge income generated from the
credit card portfolio, the number of new accounts generated, changes in customers credit card
use, and GEs ability to extend credit to our customers; |
| Our ability to correctly anticipate the appropriate levels of inventories during the year; |
| Our ability to manage our expense structure; |
| Our ability to identify opportunities to open new stores, or to remodel or expand existing
stores, including the availability of existing retail stores or store sites on acceptable
terms and our ability to successfully execute the Companys retailing concept in new markets
and geographic regions; |
| The efficient and effective operation of our distribution network and information systems
to manage sales, distribution, merchandise planning and allocation functions; |
| Our ability to expand our eCommerce business through our updated and redesigned belk.com
website, including our ability to meet the systems challenges of expanding and operating the
website and our ability to efficiently operate our eCommerce fulfillment facility; |
| Our ability to realize the planned efficiencies from our acquisitions and effectively
integrate and operate the acquired stores and businesses; and |
| The effectiveness of third parties in managing our outsourced business processes. |
For a detailed description of the risks and uncertainties that might cause our results to
differ from those we project in our forward-looking statements, we refer you to the section
captioned Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30,
2010 that we filed with the SEC on April 14, 2010 and to Part II, Item 1A of this report. Our other
filings with the SEC may contain additional information concerning the risks and uncertainties
listed above, and other factors you may wish to consider. Upon request, we will provide copies of
these filings to you free of charge.
Our forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and speak only as of the date
of such statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statement, even if future events or new information may impact the validity of such statements.
3
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
BELK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 30, | October 31, | October 30, | October 31, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 746,556 | $ | 727,988 | $ | 2,338,165 | $ | 2,249,142 | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold (including occupancy,
distribution and buying expenses) |
515,807 | 496,473 | 1,584,425 | 1,550,933 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
227,115 | 215,771 | 670,470 | 642,178 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of property and equipment |
2,687 | 639 | 4,480 | 1,552 | ||||||||||||
Asset impairment and exit costs |
59 | (117 | ) | 1,337 | 973 | |||||||||||
Pension curtailment charge |
| 2,719 | | 2,719 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
6,262 | 13,781 | 86,413 | 53,891 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(12,149 | ) | (12,931 | ) | (37,652 | ) | (38,256 | ) | ||||||||
Gain on investments |
| 14 | | 14 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(5,887 | ) | 864 | 48,761 | 15,649 | |||||||||||
Income tax (benefit) expense |
(1,648 | ) | 418 | 16,208 | 5,249 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (4,239 | ) | $ | 446 | $ | 32,553 | $ | 10,400 | |||||||
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share |
$ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.69 | $ | 0.21 | |||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
46,343,934 | 48,285,713 | 47,114,522 | 48,505,297 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
46,343,934 | 48,285,713 | 47,116,328 | 48,505,297 |
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
BELK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
October 30, | January 30, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 329,264 | $ | 585,930 | ||||
Short-term investments |
| 2,500 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
34,310 | 22,427 | ||||||
Merchandise inventory |
1,078,851 | 775,342 | ||||||
Prepaid income taxes, expenses and other current assets |
39,573 | 24,902 | ||||||
Total current assets |
1,481,998 | 1,411,101 | ||||||
Investment securities |
6,850 | 6,850 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $1,319,233 and $1,245,816 as of
October 30, 2010 and January 30, 2010, respectively |
977,590 | 1,009,250 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
114,711 | 117,827 | ||||||
Other assets |
42,477 | 37,547 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,623,626 | $ | 2,582,575 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 439,320 | $ | 243,995 | ||||
Accrued liabilities |
176,574 | 125,599 | ||||||
Accrued income taxes |
| 35,775 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
18,932 | 16,079 | ||||||
Current installments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
79,235 | 3,419 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
714,061 | 424,867 | ||||||
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, excluding current installments |
535,163 | 685,437 | ||||||
Interest rate swap liability |
6,454 | 7,403 | ||||||
Retirement obligations and other noncurrent liabilities |
320,406 | 370,573 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
1,576,084 | 1,488,280 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock |
| | ||||||
Common stock, 400 million shares authorized and 46.3 and 48.3
million shares issued and outstanding as of October 30, 2010 and
January 30, 2010, respectively |
463 | 483 | ||||||
Paid-in capital |
406,559 | 451,278 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
792,878 | 798,963 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(152,358 | ) | (156,429 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
1,047,542 | 1,094,295 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 2,623,626 | $ | 2,582,575 | ||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
BELK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Paid-in | Retained | Comprehensive | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Earnings | Income (Loss) | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 30, 2010 |
48,286 | $ | 483 | $ | 451,278 | $ | 798,963 | $ | (156,429 | ) | $ | 1,094,295 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 32,553 | | 32,553 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on
interest rate swaps, net
of $354 income taxes |
| | | | 595 | 595 | ||||||||||||||||||
Defined benefit expense,
net of $2,063 income
taxes |
| | | | 3,476 | 3,476 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
36,624 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends |
| | | (38,638 | ) | | (38,638 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Issuance of stock-based compensation |
| | (43 | ) | | | (43 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
| | 6,181 | | | 6,181 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued |
36 | | 539 | | | 539 | ||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase and retirement of common stock |
(1,978 | ) | (20 | ) | (51,396 | ) | | | (51,416 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Balance at October 30, 2010 |
46,344 | $ | 463 | $ | 406,559 | $ | 792,878 | $ | (152,358 | ) | $ | 1,047,542 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
BELK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
October 30, | October 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 32,553 | $ | 10,400 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used) provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Asset impairment and exit costs |
1,337 | 973 | ||||||
Deferred income tax expense |
4,125 | 16,051 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
106,399 | 121,558 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
6,181 | 139 | ||||||
Pension curtailment charge |
| 2,719 | ||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment |
(2,508 | ) | 420 | |||||
Amortization of deferred gain on sale and leaseback |
(1,972 | ) | (1,972 | ) | ||||
Gain on investments |
| (14 | ) | |||||
(Increase) decrease in: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
(7,464 | ) | 10,367 | |||||
Merchandise inventory |
(303,510 | ) | (187,646 | ) | ||||
Prepaid income taxes, expenses and other assets |
(22,712 | ) | (22,305 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in: |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
237,783 | 233,090 | ||||||
Accrued income taxes |
(35,775 | ) | (681 | ) | ||||
Retirement obligations and other liabilities |
(41,731 | ) | (29,050 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used) provided by operating activities |
(27,294 | ) | 154,049 | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(63,705 | ) | (36,587 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment |
434 | 70 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of short-term investments |
2,500 | 900 | ||||||
Net cash used by investing activities |
(60,771 | ) | (35,617 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
(78,504 | ) | (3,481 | ) | ||||
Repurchase and retirement of common stock |
(51,416 | ) | (5,950 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid |
(38,638 | ) | (9,752 | ) | ||||
Stock compensation tax benefit (expense) |
41 | (64 | ) | |||||
Cash paid for withholding taxes in lieu of stock-based compensation shares |
(84 | ) | (51 | ) | ||||
Net cash used by financing activities |
(168,601 | ) | (19,298 | ) | ||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(256,666 | ) | 99,134 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
585,930 | 260,134 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 329,264 | $ | 359,268 | ||||
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing activities: |
||||||||
Increase (decrease) in property and equipment through accrued purchases |
$ | 9,089 | $ | (8,232 | ) | |||
Increase in property and equipment through assumption of capital leases |
4,045 | |
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
BELK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Belk, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q
promulgated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and should be read in
conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010. In the
opinion of management, this information is fairly presented and all adjustments (consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim
periods have been included; however, certain items are included in these statements based on
estimates for the entire year. Also, operating results for the three and nine months ended October
30, 2010 may not be indicative of the operating results that may be expected for the full fiscal
year.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.
Previously, the Company presented amounts due from vendors on a gross basis due to systems
constraints and the lack of available information. In the current year, the Company has presented
amounts due from vendors on a net basis, and revised amounts presented for the nine months ended
October 31, 2009 on the cash flow statement for comparability purposes. The revision had no impact
on net income, working capital, cash flows from operating activities, or stockholders equity for
the nine months ended October 31, 2009.
(2) | Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
The following table sets forth the computation of comprehensive income (loss):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 30, | October 31, | October 30, | October 31, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | (dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (4,239 | ) | $ | 446 | $ | 32,553 | $ | 10,400 | |||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on investments, net of $17 and $222 income taxes for the three and nine months
ended October 31, 2009, respectively. |
| 29 | | 374 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain (loss) on interest rate swaps, net of $198 and $354 income taxes for the three and nine
months ended October 30, 2010, respectively and $83 and $233 income taxes for the three and
nine months ended October 31, 2009, respectively. |
333 | (141 | ) | 595 | 392 | |||||||||||
Defined
benefit expense, net of $688 and $2,063 income taxes for the three and nine months ended
October 30, 2010, respectively and $1,279 and $3,836 income taxes for the three and nine months
ended October 31, 2009, respectively. |
1,159 | 2,154 | 3,476 | 6,462 | ||||||||||||
Pension curtailment charge, net of $1,013 income taxes for the three and nine months ended
October 31, 2009. |
| 1,706 | | 1,706 | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
1,492 | 3,748 | 4,071 | 8,934 | ||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | (2,747 | ) | $ | 4,194 | $ | 36,624 | $ | 19,334 | |||||||
(3) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following table sets forth the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss:
October
30, 2010 |
January 30, 2010 |
|||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Unrealized
loss on interest rate swap, net of $2,435 and
$2,789 income taxes as of October 30, 2010 and January 30,
2010, respectively. |
$ | (4,019 | ) | $ | (4,614 | ) | ||
Defined benefit plans, net of $88,658 and $90,721
income taxes as of October 30, 2010 and January 30,
2010, respectively. |
(148,339 | ) | (151,815 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
$ | (152,358 | ) | $ | (156,429 | ) | ||
8
BELK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(4) Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement
date. The Company uses a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in
measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; Level 2, defined as inputs other
than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level
3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an
entity to develop its own assumptions.
As of October 30, 2010, the Company held an interest rate swap that is required to be measured
at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company enters into interest rate swap agreements with
financial institutions to manage the exposure to changes in interest rates. The fair value of
interest rate swap agreements is the estimated amount that the Company would pay or receive to
terminate the swap agreement, taking into account the current creditworthiness of the swap
counterparties. The fair values of swap contracts are determined based on inputs that are readily
available in public markets or can be derived from information available in publicly quoted
markets. The Company has consistently applied these valuation techniques in all periods presented.
Additionally, the change in the fair value of a swap designated as a cash flow hedge is marked to
market through accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
The Companys interest rate swap measured at fair value on a recurring basis was $6.5 million
and $7.4 million at October 30, 2010 and January 30, 2010, respectively. The Company classifies
these measurements as Level 2.
Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments
are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments only
in certain circumstances (for example, when measuring for impairment). The fair value measurements
related to long-lived assets are determined using expected future cash flow analyses. The Company
classifies these measurements as Level 3.
The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial
instruments not measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets. These included the
Companys auction rate security (ARS) and fixed rate long-term debt.
October 30, 2010 | January 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | |||||||||||||
Value | Value | Value | Value | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Financial assets |
||||||||||||||||
Auction rate security (a) |
$ | 6,850 | $ | 6,850 | $ | 9,350 | $ | 9,350 | ||||||||
Financial liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt
(excluding capitalized
leases) (b) |
$ | 592,780 | $ | 602,916 | $ | 667,780 | $ | 647,287 |
(a) | Amounts represent held-to-maturity ARS backed by student loans, which are 97% guaranteed under
the Federal Family Education Loan Program, and carries the highest credit ratings of AAA. |
|
(b) | Represents the sum of fixed rate and variable rate long-term debt excluding capitalized leases. |
As of October 30, 2010, the par value of the ARS was $6.9 million and the estimated fair value
was $6.9 million. The fair value of the ARS is estimated using Level 3 inputs as a result of the
lack of frequent trading in these securities. The ARS fair value determination used an
income-approach considering factors that reflect assumptions market participants would use in
pricing, including: the collateralization underlying the investment; the creditworthiness of the
counterparty; expected future cash flows, including the next time the security is expected to have
a successful auction; and risks associated with the uncertainties in the current market. The
Company has no reason to believe that the underlying issuer of the ARS is presently at risk or that
the underlying credit quality of the assets backing the ARS investment has been impacted by the
reduced liquidity of this investment.
The fair value of the Companys fixed rate long-term debt is estimated based on the current
rates offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities.
9
BELK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(5) Asset Impairment and Exit Costs
During the three and nine months ended October 30, 2010, the Company recorded a $3.5 million
charge for real estate holding costs, offset by a $3.5 million revision to a previously estimated
lease buyout reserve. In addition, during the nine months ended October 30, 2010, the Company
recorded $0.9 million in impairment charges to adjust two retail locations net book values to fair
value.
During the three months ended October 31, 2009, the Company recorded a $0.2 million reduction
to previously estimated severance costs associated with the closing of two stores, partially offset
by $0.1 million in severance costs associated with the outsourcing of certain information
technology and support functions. During the nine months ended October 31, 2009, the Company
recorded $1.0 million in exit costs comprised primarily of severance costs associated with the
outsourcing of certain information technology and support functions as well as the closing of two
stores.
(6) Borrowings
As of October 30, 2010, the credit facility was comprised of an outstanding $250.0 million
term loan and a $350.0 million revolving line of credit that was
to mature in October 2011. This
facility was refinanced on November 23, 2010. Under the new credit facility, the Company has a
$350.0 million revolving line of credit and a $125.0 million term loan maturing November 2015. The
refinanced credit facility allows for up to $250.0 million of outstanding letters of credit.
Amounts outstanding under the credit facility bear interest at a base rate, being the higher of the
prime rate or the federal funds rate plus 0.5% or LIBOR plus 1.0%, or LIBOR plus a LIBOR rate
margin, at the Companys choice. The LIBOR rate margin, currently 1.50%, is based upon the
leverage ratio. The credit facility contains restrictive covenants including leverage and fixed
charge coverage ratios. The Companys calculated leverage ratio dictates the LIBOR spread that will
be charged on outstanding borrowings in the subsequent quarter. The leverage ratio is calculated by
dividing adjusted debt, which is the sum of the Companys outstanding debt and rent expense
multiplied by a factor of eight, by pre-tax income plus net interest expense and non-cash items,
such as depreciation, amortization, and impairment expense. The maximum leverage covenant ratio
decreased from 4.25 under the previous facility to 4.0 under the new facility. The Company was in
compliance with all covenants at the end of third quarter fiscal year 2011 and does not anticipate
non-compliance with any debt covenants during the remainder of fiscal year 2011 or fiscal year
2012.
During the three months ended May 1, 2010, the Company made a $75.0 million discretionary
payment toward the outstanding term loan under the credit facility. An additional discretionary
payment of $125.0 million was made on November 23, 2010, of which cash on hand of $75.0 million was
used and reclassified from long-term to short-term debt as of October 30, 2010. The remaining
$50.0 million was funded by an agreement entered into by the Company on November 23, 2010 where we
issued a $50.0 million, 5.70% fixed rate, 10-year note.
(7) Sale of Properties
During the third quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company increased the carrying value of a
previously impaired store location, which resulted in an adjustment of $1.4 million.
(8) Income Taxes
During the three months ended October 31, 2010, the effective income tax rate was 28.0%
compared to 48.4% for the three months ended October 31, 2009. The decrease in the rate was due
primarily to a prior year $0.1 million adjustment relating to work opportunity tax credits, which
had a large impact on the effective tax rate due to the relatively small amount of pre-tax income
for the period. In addition for the three months ended October 31, 2010, there was an adjustment
of $0.3 million from the Companys January 30, 2010 income tax provision to the income tax returns
filed primarily due to estimates of work opportunity tax credits.
10
BELK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(9) Pension and Postretirement Benefits
The Company has a defined benefit pension plan, the Belk Pension Plan, which prior to fiscal
year 2010 had been partially frozen and closed to new participants. Pension benefits were suspended
for fiscal year 2010, and effective December 31, 2009, the Pension Plan was frozen for those
remaining participants whose benefits were not previously frozen in fiscal year 2006.
The Company has a non-qualified defined benefit Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (Old
SERP), which provides retirement and death benefits to certain qualified executives. Old SERP has
been closed to new executives and has been replaced by the 2004 Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan (2004 SERP), a non-qualified defined contribution plan.
The Company also provides postretirement medical and life insurance benefits to certain
retired full-time employees.
The components of net periodic benefit expense for these plans are as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension Plan | Old SERP Plan | Postretirement Plan | ||||||||||||||||||||||
October 30, | October 31, | October 30, | October 31, | October 30, | October 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | | $ | | $ | 18 | $ | 17 | $ | 37 | $ | 33 | ||||||||||||
Interest cost |
6,517 | 6,649 | 155 | 86 | 340 | 406 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(6,550 | ) | (5,527 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of transition
obligation |
| | | | 66 | 65 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
| 124 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of net loss |
1,753 | 3,234 | 36 | | (8 | ) | 10 | |||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit expense |
$ | 1,720 | $ | 4,480 | $ | 209 | $ | 103 | $ | 435 | $ | 514 | ||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension Plan | Old SERP Plan | Postretirement Plan | ||||||||||||||||||||||
October 30, | October 31, | October 30, | October 31, | October 30, | October 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | | $ | | $ | 55 | $ | 95 | $ | 112 | $ | 99 | ||||||||||||
Interest cost |
19,552 | 19,947 | 463 | 472 | 1,020 | 1,218 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(19,651 | ) | (16,582 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of transition
obligation |
| | | | 196 | 196 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
| 372 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of net loss |
5,257 | 9,701 | 108 | | (23 | ) | 29 | |||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit expense |
$ | 5,158 | $ | 13,438 | $ | 626 | $ | 567 | $ | 1,305 | $ | 1,542 | ||||||||||||
The Company made a $14.3 million discretionary contribution to its Pension Plan on April 22,
2010, June 14, 2010, and September 13, 2010, respectively, and an $8.0 million contribution on
October 13, 2010. The Company expects to make an additional discretionary contribution of
approximately $8.0 million to the Pension Plan before January 29, 2011. In the prior year, the
Company made a $44.0 million discretionary contribution to its Pension Plan on September 15, 2009.
(10) Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the
weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. The diluted EPS
calculation includes the effect of contingently issuable stock-based compensation awards with
performance vesting conditions as being outstanding at the beginning of the period in which all
vesting conditions are met. If all necessary conditions have not been satisfied by the end of the
period, the contingently issuable shares included in diluted EPS are based on the number of
dilutive shares that would be issuable if the end of the reporting period were the end of the
contingency period. Contingently-issuable non-vested
11
BELK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
share awards are included in the diluted EPS calculation as of the beginning of the period (or as
of the date of the contingent share agreement, if later).
The reconciliation of basic and diluted shares for the three and nine months ended October 30,
2010 and October 31, 2009, are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 30, | October 31, | October 30, | October 31, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Basic Shares |
46,343,934 | 48,285,713 | 47,114,522 | 48,505,297 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive
contingently-issuable
non-vested share
awards |
| | 1,806 | | ||||||||||||
Diluted Shares |
46,343,934 | 48,285,713 | 47,116,328 | 48,505,297 | ||||||||||||
For the three months ended October 30, 2010, the Company had a net loss from operations;
therefore, the inclusion of contingently-issuable non-vested share awards would have an anti-dilutive
effect on the Companys calculation of diluted loss per share. Accordingly, the diluted loss per
share equals basic loss per share for this period.
(11) Repurchase of Common Stock
On April 1, 2010, the Companys Board of Directors approved a self-tender offer to purchase up to
2,880,000 shares of common stock at a price of $26.00 per share. The tender offer was initiated on
April 21, 2010, and on May 19, 2010, the Company accepted for purchase 1,482,822 shares of Class A
and 494,719 shares of Class B common stock for $51.4 million.
12
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Belk, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company or Belk), is the
largest privately owned mainline department store business in the United States. As of October 30,
2010, the Company had 305 stores in 16 states, located primarily in the southern United States.
The Company generated revenues of $3.3 billion for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010, and
together with its predecessors, has been successfully operating department stores since 1888 by
seeking to provide superior service and merchandise that meets customers needs for fashion, value
and quality.
The following discussion, which presents the results of the Company, should be read in
conjunction with the Companys consolidated financial statements as of January 30, 2010, and for
the year then ended, and related Notes and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, all contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended January 30, 2010.
The Companys fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to each January 31. All references to
fiscal year 2011 refer to the fiscal year that will end January 29, 2011 and all references to
fiscal year 2010 refer to the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010.
The Companys revenues increased 2.6% in the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 to $746.6
million due primarily to an increase in overall consumer spending and enhanced merchandising and
marketing programs. Comparable store revenues increased 2.5%. Comparable store revenue includes
stores that have reached the one-year anniversary of their opening as of the beginning of the
fiscal year and eCommerce revenues, but excludes closed stores. Operating income decreased to $6.3
million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 compared to $13.8 million during the same period
in fiscal year 2010. Net income decreased to a net loss of $4.2 million or $0.09 per basic and
diluted share in the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 compared to $0.4 million or $0.01 per basic
and diluted share during the same period in fiscal year 2010. The decrease in net income was due
primarily to higher costs of goods sold and selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses.
For the three and nine months ended October 30, 2010, the Company spent approximately $10 million
on re-branding and other corporate strategic initiatives, including merchandising, information
technology and e-commerce.
The Companys revenues increased 4.0% in the first nine months of fiscal year 2011 to $2,338.2
million. Comparable store sales increased 4.4%. Operating income increased to $86.4 million in the
first nine months of fiscal year 2011 compared to $53.9 million during the same period in fiscal
year 2010. Net income increased to $32.6 million or $0.69 per basic and diluted share compared to
$10.4 million or $0.21 per basic and diluted share during the same period in fiscal year 2010. The
increase in net income was due primarily to continued positive results from initiatives focused on
sales and margin performance.
Belk stores seek to provide customers the convenience of one-stop shopping, with an appealing
merchandise mix and extensive offerings of brands, styles, assortments and sizes. Belk stores sell
top national brands of fashion apparel, shoes and accessories for women, men and children, as well
as cosmetics, home furnishings, housewares, fine jewelry, gifts and other types of quality
merchandise. The Company also sells exclusive private label brands, which offer customers
differentiated merchandise selections. Larger Belk stores may include hair salons, spas,
restaurants, optical centers and other amenities.
The Company seeks to be the leading department store in its markets by selling merchandise to
customers that meets their needs for fashion, selection, value, quality and service. To achieve
this goal, Belks business strategy focuses on quality merchandise assortments, effective marketing
and sales promotional strategies, attracting and retaining talented, well-qualified associates to
deliver superior customer service, and operating efficiently with investments in information
technology and process improvement.
The Company operates department stores in the highly competitive retail industry. Management
believes that the principal competitive factors for retail department store operations include
merchandise selection, quality, value, customer service and convenience. The Company believes its
stores are strong competitors in all of these areas. The Companys primary competitors are
traditional department stores, mass merchandisers, national apparel chains,
13
individual specialty apparel stores and direct merchant firms, including J.C. Penney Company,
Inc., Dillards, Inc., Kohls Corporation, Macys, Inc., Sears Holding Corporation, Target
Corporation and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
In recent years, the Company has taken advantage of prudent opportunities to expand its store
base by opening and expanding stores in new and existing markets in order to increase sales, market
share and customer loyalty. In response to recent economic conditions and the significant decline
in the number of new retail centers being developed, the Company has scaled back its store growth
plans but will continue to explore strategic opportunities to open and expand stores where the Belk
name and reputation are well known and in contiguous markets where Belk can distinguish its stores
from the competition. The Company will also consider closing stores in markets where more
attractive locations become available or where the Company does not believe there is potential for
long term growth and success. In addition, the Company periodically reviews and adjusts its space
requirements to create greater operating efficiencies and convenience for the customer.
In October 2010, the Company launched a branding campaign which included a change in logo and
extensive advertising and promotional activity in connection with the new brand and tagline. The Company is investing approximately $70 million over the next 18 months in advertising, supplies and
capital, and is in the process of changing exterior and interior signing on all stores.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage relationship to
revenues of certain items in the Companys unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income,
as well as a period comparison of changes in comparable store net revenue.
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 30, | October 31, | October 30, | October 31, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold (including occupancy,
distribution and buying expenses) |
69.1 | 68.2 | 67.8 | 69.0 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
30.4 | 29.6 | 28.7 | 28.6 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of property and equipment |
0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Asset impairment and exit costs |
| | 0.1 | | ||||||||||||
Pension Curtailment Charge |
| 0.4 | | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
0.8 | 1.9 | 3.7 | 2.4 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
1.6 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(0.8 | ) | 0.1 | 2.1 | 0.7 | |||||||||||
Income tax (benefit) expense |
(0.2 | ) | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.2 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
(0.6 | ) | 0.1 | 1.4 | 0.5 | |||||||||||
Comparable store net revenue increase (decrease) |
2.5 | (2.1 | ) | 4.4 | (6.5 | ) |
Revenues
The following table gives information regarding the percentage of revenues contributed by each
merchandise area for each of the respective periods. There were no material changes for the
periods as reflected in the table below.
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 30, | October 31, | October 30, | October 31, | |||||||||||||
Merchandise Areas | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Womens |
36 | % | 37 | % | 38 | % | 39 | % | ||||||||
Cosmetics, Shoes and Accessories |
34 | 33 | 32 | 32 | ||||||||||||
Mens |
15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | ||||||||||||
Home |
8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | ||||||||||||
Childrens |
7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||
14
Comparison of the Three and Nine Months Ended October 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009
Revenues. The Companys revenues for the three months ended October 30, 2010 increased 2.6%,
or $18.6 million, to $746.6 million from $728.0 million during the same period in fiscal year 2010.
The increase is primarily attributable to a 2.5% increase in revenues from comparable stores and a
$0.9 million increase in revenues from new stores, partially offset by a decrease in revenues from
closed stores of $1.0 million.
The Companys revenues for the nine months ended October 30, 2010 increased 4.0%, or $89.0
million, to $2,338.2 million from $2,249.1 million during the same period in fiscal year 2010. The
increase is primarily attributable to a 4.4% increase in revenues from comparable stores and a $4.0
million increase in revenues from new stores, partially offset by a decrease in revenues from
closed stores of $9.9 million.
Cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold was $515.8 million, or 69.1% of revenues, for the
three months ended October 30, 2010 compared to $496.5 million, or 68.2% of revenues, for the same
period in fiscal year 2010. The increase in cost of goods sold as a percentage of revenues was
primarily attributable to increased buying expenses related to the Companys merchandising
initiatives, partially offset by reduced markdown activity for the three months ended October 30,
2010.
Cost of goods sold was $1,584.4 million, or 67.8% of revenues, for the nine months ended
October 30, 2010 compared to $1,550.9 million, or 69.0% of revenues, for the same period in fiscal
year 2010. The decrease in cost of goods sold as a percentage of revenues was primarily
attributable to reduced markdown activity, partially offset by the increase in buying expenses
related to the companys merchandising initiatives for the nine months ended October 30, 2010.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
were $227.1 million, or 30.4% of revenues for the three months ended October 30, 2010, compared to
$215.8 million, or 29.6% of revenues for the same period in fiscal year 2010. The increase in SG&A
expenses was primarily due to an increase in re-branding and other corporate strategic initiatives
of approximately $10 million, advertising, and performance based compensation, partially offset by
reductions in depreciation and pension expense for the three months ended October 30, 2010. The
increase in the SG&A expense rate is primarily the result of re-branding and other corporate
strategic initiatives and an increase in advertising expense as a percentage of revenues, partially
offset by a decrease in depreciation expense.
SG&A expenses were $670.5 million, or 28.7% of revenues for the nine months ended October 30,
2010, compared to $642.2 million, or 28.6% of revenues for the same period in fiscal year 2010.
The increase in SG&A expenses was primarily due to an increase in re-branding and other corporate
strategic initiatives of approximately $10 million, advertising, and performance based
compensation, partially offset by reductions in depreciation and pension expense for the nine
months ended October 30, 2010. The increase in the SG&A expense rate is primarily the result of
re-branding and other corporate strategic initiatives and an increase in advertising expense as a
percentage of revenues, partially offset by a decrease in depreciation expense.
Gain on sale of property and equipment. Gain on sale of property and equipment was $2.7
million for the three months ended October 30, 2010, compared to $0.6 million for the same period
in fiscal year 2010. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the carrying value of a
previously impaired store location, which resulted in an adjustment of $1.4 million.
Gain on sale of property and equipment was $4.5 million for the nine months ended October 30,
2010, compared to $1.6 million for the same period in fiscal year 2010. The increase was primarily
due to an increase in the carrying value of a previously impaired store location, which resulted in an adjustment of $1.4 million. In addition, the Company recognized $1.1
million in insurance claims recoveries.
Asset impairment and exit costs. During the three and nine months ended October 30, 2010, the
Company recorded a $3.5 million charge for real estate holding costs, offset by a $3.5 million
revision to a previously estimated lease buyout reserve. In addition, during the nine months ended
October 30, 2010, the Company recorded $0.9 million in impairment charges to adjust two retail
locations net book values to fair value.
15
During the three months ended October 31, 2009, the Company recorded a $0.2 million reduction
to previously estimated severance costs associated with the closing of two stores, partially offset
by $0.1 million in severance costs associated with the outsourcing of certain information
technology and support functions. During the nine months ended October 31, 2009, the Company
recorded $1.0 million in exit costs comprised primarily of severance costs associated with the
outsourcing of certain information technology and support functions, as well as the closing of two
stores.
Pension curtailment charge. A one-time pension curtailment charge of $2.7 million for the
three and nine months ended October 31, 2009 resulted from the decision to freeze the Companys
defined benefit plan, effective December 31, 2009, for those remaining participants whose benefits
were not previously frozen in fiscal year 2006.
Income tax expense (benefit). Income tax benefit for the three months ended October 30, 2010
was $1.6 million compared to an income tax expense of $0.4 million for the same period in fiscal
year 2010. The effective income tax rate for the three months ended October 30, 2010 was 28.0%
compared to 48.4% for the same period in fiscal year 2010. The decrease in the rate was due
primarily to a prior year $0.1 million adjustment relating to work opportunity tax credits, which
had a large impact on the effective tax rate due to the relatively small amount of pre-tax income
for the period. In addition for the three months ended October 31, 2010, there was an adjustment
of $0.3 million from the Companys January 30, 2010 income tax provision to the income tax returns
filed primarily due to estimates of work opportunity tax credits.
Seasonality and Quarterly Fluctuations
The Company has historically experienced and expects to continue to experience seasonal
fluctuations in its revenues, operating income and net income due to the seasonal nature of the
retail business. The highest revenue period for the Company is the fourth quarter, which includes
the holiday selling season. A disproportionate amount of the Companys revenues and a substantial
amount of the Companys operating and net income are realized during the fourth quarter. If for any
reason the Companys revenues were below seasonal norms during the fourth quarter, the Companys
annual results of operations could be adversely affected. The Companys inventory levels generally
reach their highest levels in anticipation of increased revenues during these months. The Companys
quarterly results of operations could also fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of
factors, including the timing of new store openings.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Companys primary sources of liquidity are cash on hand, cash flows from operations, and
borrowings under debt facilities, which, as of October 30, 2010, consisted of a $600.0 million
credit facility that was to mature in October 2011 and $325.0 million in senior notes. As of October 30,
2010, the credit facility was comprised of an outstanding $250.0 million term loan and a $350.0
million revolving line of credit.
The credit facility allowed for up to $200.0 million of outstanding letters of credit. The
credit facility charges interest based upon certain Company financial ratios, and the interest
spread was calculated at October 30, 2010 using LIBOR plus 150 basis points. The credit facility
contains restrictive financial covenants including leverage and fixed charge coverage ratios. The
Companys calculated leverage ratio dictates the LIBOR spread that will be charged on outstanding
borrowings in the subsequent quarter. The leverage ratio is calculated by dividing adjusted debt,
which is the sum of the Companys outstanding debt and rent expense multiplied by a factor of
eight, by pre-tax income plus net interest expense and non-cash charges, such as depreciation,
amortization, and impairment charges. At October 30, 2010, the maximum leverage allowed under the
credit facility was 4.25, and the calculated leverage ratio was 2.73. As of October 30, 2010, the
Company had $35.4 million of standby letters of credit outstanding under the credit facility, and
availability under the credit facility was $314.6 million.
This facility was refinanced on November 23, 2010. Under the new credit facility, the Company
has a $350.0 million revolving line of credit and a $125.0 million term loan maturing November
2015. The refinanced credit facility
16
allows for up to $250.0 million of outstanding letters of credit. Amounts outstanding under the credit facility bear interest at a base rate, being the
higher of the prime rate or the federal funds rate plus 0.5% or LIBOR plus 1.0%, or LIBOR plus a
LIBOR rate margin, at the Companys choice. The LIBOR rate margin, currently 1.50%, is based upon
the leverage ratio. The credit facility contains restrictive covenants including leverage and fixed
charge coverage ratios. The Companys calculated leverage ratio dictates the LIBOR spread that will
be charged on outstanding borrowings in the subsequent quarter. The leverage ratio is calculated by
dividing adjusted debt, which is the sum of the Companys outstanding debt and rent expense
multiplied by a factor of eight, by pre-tax income plus net interest expense and non-cash items,
such as depreciation, amortization, and impairment expense. The maximum leverage covenant ratio
decreased from 4.25 under the previous facility to 4.0 under the new facility. The Company was in
compliance with all covenants as of October 30, 2010 and expects to remain in compliance with all
debt covenants for the next twelve months.
During the three months ended May 1, 2010, the Company made a $75.0 million discretionary
payment toward the outstanding term loan under the credit facility. An additional discretionary
payment of $125.0 million was made on November 23, 2010, of which cash on hand of $75.0 million was
used and reclassified from long-term to short-term debt as of October 30, 2010. The remaining
$50.0 million was funded by an agreement entered into by the Company on November 23, 2010 where we
issued a $50.0 million, 5.70% fixed rate, 10-year note.
The senior notes are comprised of an $80.0 million floating rate senior note that has a stated
variable interest rate based on three-month LIBOR plus 80.0 basis points, or 1.08% at October 30,
2010, that matures in July 2012. This $80.0 million notional amount has an associated interest
rate swap with a fixed interest rate of 5.2%. Additionally, a $20.0 million fixed rate senior note
that bears interest of 5.05% matures in July 2012, a $100.0 million fixed rate senior note that
bears interest of 5.31% matures in July 2015, and a $125.0 million fixed rate senior note that
bears interest of 6.2% matures in August 2017. The senior notes have restrictive covenants that are
similar to the Companys credit facility. Additionally, the Company has a $17.8 million, 20-year
variable rate, 0.28% at October 30, 2010, state bond facility which matures in October 2025.
The debt facilities place certain restrictions on mergers, consolidations, acquisitions, sales
of assets, indebtedness, transactions with affiliates, leases, liens, investments, dividends and
distributions, exchange and issuance of capital stock and guarantees, and require maintenance of
minimum financial ratios, which include a leverage ratio, consolidated debt to consolidated
capitalization ratio and a fixed charge coverage ratio. These ratios are calculated exclusive of
non-cash charges, such as fixed asset, goodwill and other intangible asset impairments.
The Company utilizes a derivative financial instrument (interest rate swap agreement) to
manage the interest rate risk associated with its borrowings. The Company has not historically
traded, and does not anticipate prospectively trading, in derivatives. The swap agreement is used
to reduce the potential impact of increases in interest rates on variable rate debt. The difference
between the fixed rate leg and the variable rate leg of the swap, to be paid or received, is
accrued and recognized as an adjustment to interest expense. Additionally, the change in the fair value of
a swap designated as a cash flow hedge is marked to market through accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss).
The Companys exposure to derivative instruments was limited to one interest rate swap as of
October 30, 2010, an $80.0 million notional amount swap, which has a fixed interest rate of 5.2%
and expires in fiscal year 2013. It has been designated as a cash flow hedge against variability in
future interest rate payments on the $80.0 million floating rate senior note.
Management believes that cash flows from operations and existing credit facilities will be
sufficient to cover working capital needs, stock repurchases, dividends, capital expenditures,
pension funding and debt service requirements for the next twelve months and foreseeable future.
Net cash used by operating activities was $27.3 million for the nine months ended October 30,
2010 compared to net cash provided of $154.0 million for the same period in fiscal year 2010. The
decrease in cash flows from operating activities for the nine months ended October 30, 2010 was
principally due to the increase in inventory to support current sales trends, a $40.3 million
increase in income taxes paid in fiscal year 2011, and $51.0 million discretionary defined benefit
plan contributions in fiscal year 2011, partially offset by a $22.2 million increase in net income
for the current year period.
17
Net cash used by investing activities was $60.8 million for the nine months ended October 30,
2010 compared to $35.6 million for the same period in fiscal year 2010. The increase in cash used
by investing activities primarily resulted from increased purchases of property and equipment of
$27.1 million, partially offset from the $2.5 million partial redemption of a short-term investment
in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011.
Net cash used by financing activities was $168.6 million for the nine months ended October 30,
2010 compared to $19.3 million for the same period in fiscal year 2010. The increase in cash used
by financing activities was primarily due to the $75.0 million discretionary payment on the credit
facility term loan, a $45.5 million increase in the repurchase and retirement of common stock, and
a $28.9 million increase in dividends paid for fiscal year 2011 compared to the same period in
fiscal year 2010.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
A table representing the scheduled maturities of the Companys contractual obligations and
commercial commitments as of January 30, 2010 was included under the heading Contractual
Obligations and Commercial Commitments of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended January 30, 2010. The credit facility was refinanced on November 23, 2010. Under the
new credit facility, the Company has a $350.0 million revolving line of credit and a $125.0 million
term loan maturing November 2015. During the three months ended May 1, 2010, the Company made a
$75.0 million discretionary payment toward the outstanding term loan under the credit facility. An
additional discretionary payment of $125.0 million was made on November 23, 2010, of which cash on
hand of $75.0 million was used and reclassified from long-term to short-term debt as of October 30,
2010. The remaining $50.0 million was funded by an agreement entered into by the Company on
November 23, 2010 where we issued a $50.0 million, 5.70% fixed rate, 10-year note.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has not created, and is not party to, any special-purpose or off-balance sheet
entities for the purpose of raising capital, incurring debt or operating the Companys business.
The Company does not have any arrangements or relationships with entities that are not consolidated
into the financial statements that are reasonably likely to materially affect the Companys
liquidity or the availability of capital resources.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no material changes to the Companys quantitative and qualitative market risk
disclosures during the three and nine months ended October 30, 2010 from the disclosures contained
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Companys management conducted an evaluation pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, under the supervision and with the participation of its
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered
by this report. The Companys disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under
the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including its Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that
the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
During the period covered by this report, there were no changes in the Companys internal
control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
18
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to various legal proceedings and
claims. The Company believes that the ultimate outcome of these matters will not have a material
adverse effect on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed on April 14, 2010 other than the updated risk factor below.
Belk Re-Branding
In October 2010, we launched a branding campaign which included a change in our logo and
extensive advertising and promotional activity in connection with our new brand and tagline. We
are investing approximately $70 million over the next 18 months in advertising, supplies and
capital, and we are in the process of changing exterior and interior signing on all of our stores.
If customers do not accept our new brand, our sales, performance and customer relationships could
be adversely affected.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Reserved
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
3.1 | Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company
(incorporated by reference to pages B-24 to B-33 of the Companys Registration Statement
on Form S-4/A, filed on March 5, 1998 (File No. 333-42935)). |
||
3.2 | Form of Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.2 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
January 31, 2004). |
||
4.1 | Articles Fourth, Fifth and Seventh of the Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to pages B-24 to B-33 of the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-4/A, filed on March 5, 1998 (File No.
333-42935)). |
||
4.2 | Articles I and IV of the Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004). |
19
10.1 | Form of Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated November 23, 2010, by and
among Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Bank of America, N.A. and the other lenders
referred to therein. |
||
10.2 | Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2010, by and among Belk, Inc. and
certain subsidiaries of Belk, Inc., as obligors, and the purchasers referred to therein. |
||
31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule
15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted under Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule
15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted under Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
32.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
32.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
20
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
BELK, INC. |
||||
Dated: December 8, 2010 | By: | /s/ Ralph A. Pitts | ||
Ralph A. Pitts | ||||
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary (Authorized Officer of the Registrant) |
||||
By: | /s/ Brian T. Marley | |||
Brian T. Marley | ||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
||||
21