HANGER, INC. - FORM 10-Q - November 5, 2010

Attached files

file	filename
EX-32 - EX-32 - HANGER, INC.	a10-17537_1ex32.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - HANGER, INC.	a10-17537_1ex31d2.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - HANGER, INC.	a10-17537_1ex31d1.htm

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 1-10670

HANGER ORTHOPEDIC GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		84-0904275
(State or other jurisdiction of		(IRS Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

10910 Domain Drive, Suite 300, Austin, TX		78758
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (512) 777-3800

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T ( 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one).

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer x

Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes o No x

As of November 1, 2010, 32,481,046 shares of common stock, $.01 par value per share, were outstanding.

Table of Contents

HANGER ORTHOPEDIC GROUP, INC.

INDEX

		Page No.

Part I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Consolidated Balance Sheets — September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009		1

Consolidated Income Statements for the Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009		3

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009		4

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements		5

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	24

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	42

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	44

Part II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	44

Item 6.	Exhibits	46

SIGNATURES		47

Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Table of Contents

HANGER ORTHOPEDIC GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009

ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	95,609	$	84,558
Short-term investments	—		4,976
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $14,537 and $10,526 in 2010 and 2009, respectively	104,610		105,480
Inventories	98,606		91,289
Prepaid expenses, other assets, and income taxes receivable	15,995		8,380
Deferred income taxes	12,743		15,167
Total current assets	327,563		309,850

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Land	864		864
Buildings	4,551		4,599
Furniture and fixtures	15,064		14,007
Machinery and equipment	49,755		45,803
Leasehold improvements	56,499		52,174
Computer and software	65,057		59,980
Total property, plant and equipment, gross	191,790		177,427
Less accumulated depreciation	126,357		115,116
Total property, plant and equipment, net	65,433		62,311

INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill	494,399		484,422
Patents and other intangible assets, net	7,928		7,516
Total intangible assets, net	502,327		491,938

OTHER ASSETS
Debt issuance costs, net	4,294		5,660
Other assets	3,943		5,277
Total other assets	8,237		10,937

TOTAL ASSETS	$	903,560	$	875,036

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

HANGER ORTHOPEDIC GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

	September 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

CURRENT LIABILITIES
Current portion of long-term debt	$	6,238		$	8,835
Accounts payable	22,995			27,552
Accrued expenses	22,991			19,223
Accrued interest payable	6,268			1,776
Accrued compensation related costs	29,960			35,800
Total current liabilities	88,452			93,186

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Long-term debt, less current portion	399,091			401,637
Deferred income taxes	41,115			37,973
Other liabilities	27,149			26,347
Total liabilities	555,807			559,143

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note H)

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock, $.01 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized, 33,643,401 and 32,992,674 shares issued in 2010 and 2009, respectively	336			330
Additional paid-in capital	242,574			233,111
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(1,353		)	(3,056		)
Retained earnings	106,852			86,164
	348,409			316,549
Treasury stock, at cost (141,154 shares)	(656		)	(656		)
Total shareholders’ equity	347,753			315,893

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	903,560		$	875,036

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

HANGER ORTHOPEDIC GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS

For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30,

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009

Net sales	$	206,749	$	192,296	$	590,874	$	554,966
Cost of goods sold - materials	63,373		58,887		179,776		168,784
Personnel costs	70,108		66,976		209,429		196,783
Other operating expenses	42,507		38,669		118,531		114,085
Relocation expenses	7,975		—		14,220		—
Depreciation and amortization	4,471		4,002		13,242		12,265
Income from operations	18,315		23,762		55,676		63,049

Interest expense	7,636		7,692		22,684		22,727
Income before taxes	10,679		16,070		32,992		40,322

Provision for income taxes	3,755		6,428		12,303		16,129
Net income	$	6,924	$	9,642	$	20,689	$	24,193

Basic Per Common Share Data
Net income	$	0.21	$	0.31	$	0.64	$	0.77
Shares used to compute basic per common share amounts	32,377,237		31,578,889		32,097,084		31,263,458

Diluted Per Common Share Data
Net income	$	0.21	$	0.30	$	0.63	$	0.76
Shares used to compute diluted per common share amounts	32,866,487		32,214,321		32,784,479		31,938,613

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

HANGER ORTHOPEDIC GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Nine Months Ended September 30,

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

	2010			2009

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	20,689		24,193

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Gain (loss) on disposal of assets and auction rate securities	704			(123		)
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap	—			(167		)
Provision for bad debts	12,213			12,516
Provision for income taxes	4,052			1,076
Depreciation and amortization	13,242			12,265
Amortization of debt issuance costs	1,366			1,366
Compensation expense on restricted stock	5,920			5,429
Other	(93		)	—
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquired companies:
Accounts receivable	(10,038		)	(8,094		)
Inventories	(7,604		)	(2,391		)
Prepaid expenses, other current assets, and income taxes receivable	(7,873		)	1,722
Other assets	(76		)	36
Accounts payable	(1,154		)	(573		)
Accrued expenses and accrued interest payable	11,010			4,294
Accrued compensation related costs	(5,865		)	(7,983		)
Other liabilities	2,429			2,583
Net cash provided by operating activities	38,922			46,149

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment (net of acquisitions)	(19,743		)	(12,675		)
Acquisitions and contingent purchase price (net of cash acquired)	(9,385		)	(2,512		)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities	6,494			—
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment	72			303
Net cash used in investing activities	(22,562		)	(14,884		)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayment under revolving credit facility	—			(15,253		)
Repayment of term loan	(1,731		)	(539		)
Scheduled repayment of seller’s notes	(1,934		)	(2,045		)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	2,013			2,941
Proceeds from line of credit	—			3,600
Repayment of line of credit	(3,657		)	—
Net cash used in financing activities	(5,309		)	(11,296		)

Increase in cash and cash equivalents	11,051			19,969
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period	84,558			58,413
Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period	$	95,609		$	78,382

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

HANGER ORTHOPEDIC GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE A — BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 have been prepared by Hanger Orthopedic Group, Inc. (the “Company”) pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for interim financial reporting. These consolidated statements are unaudited and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) necessary for a fair statement for the periods presented. The year-end consolidated data was derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year.

These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company and notes thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed by the Company with the SEC.

NOTE B — SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. At various times throughout the year, the Company maintains cash balances in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limits.

Table of Contents

NOTE B - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Inventories

Inventories, which consist principally of raw materials, work in process and finished goods, are stated at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out method. For its patient-care centers segment, the Company calculates cost of goods sold-materials in accordance with the gross profit method for all reporting periods. The Company bases the estimates used in applying the gross profit method on the actual results of the most recently completed fiscal year and other factors, such as a change in the sales mix or changes in the trend of purchases. Cost of goods sold-materials during the interim periods are reconciled and adjusted when the annual physical inventory is taken. The Company treats these adjustments as changes in accounting estimates.

For its distribution segment, a perpetual inventory is maintained. Management adjusts the reserve for inventory obsolescence whenever the facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying cost of certain inventory items is in excess of its market price. Shipping and handling activities are reported as part of cost of goods sold-materials.

Fair Value

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures, which establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements. The authoritative guidance requires disclosure about how fair value is determined for assets and liabilities and establishes a hierarchy by which these assets and liabilities must be grouped, based on significant levels of inputs as follows:

Level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability;

Level 3 unobservable inputs, such as discounted cash flow models and valuations.

The determination of where assets and liabilities fall within this hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the authoritative guidance regarding the option to fair value financial assets and liabilities that permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings.

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures for all non-financial assets and liabilities, except those that are

Table of Contents

NOTE B - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Fair Value (continued)

recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. As of September 30, 2010, there has been no impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements related to the application of fair value measurements and disclosures guidance for non-financial assets and liabilities.

The following is a listing of the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and where they are classified within the hierarchy as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively:

	September 30, 2010 (unaudited)								December 31, 2009 (unaudited)
(in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Marketable Securities
Money market funds	$	77,015	$	—	$	—	$	77,015	$	78,590	$	—	$	—	$	78,590

Trading Securities
Auction rate securities	—		—		—		—		—		—		4,660		4,660
Rights on auction rate securities	—		—		—		—		—		—		315		315

Available-for-sale debt securities
Auction rate securities	—		—		—		—		—		—		1,387		1,387

	$	77,015	$	—	$	—	$	77,015	$	78,590	$	—	$	6,362	$	84,952

(in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Liabilities
Derivatives
Interest rate swaps	$	—	$	2,732	$	—	$	2,732	$	—	$	5,256	$	—	$	5,256

Table of Contents

NOTE B - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Fair Value (continued)

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and, 2009, assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs had the following activity:

	Fair Value Measurements
	Using Significant Unobservable Inputs
	(Level 3)
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010	Auction Rate Securities			Rights			Total
Balance as of December 31, 2009	$	6,047		$	315		$	6,362
Total unrealized gains (losses)
Included in earnings	(160		)	4			(156		)
Included in accumulated other comprehensive loss	313			—			313
Settlements	(6,200		)	(319		)	(6,519		)
Balance as of September 30, 2010 (unaudited)	$	—		$	—		$	—

For the nine months ended September 30, 2009	Auction Rate Securities			Rights			Total
Balance as of December 31, 2008	$	5,465		$	1,006		$	6,471
Total unrealized gains (losses)
Included in earnings	660			(652		)	8
Included in accumulated other comprehensive loss	(289		)	—			(289		)
Balance as of September 30, 2009 (unaudited)	$	5,836		$	354		$	6,190

Investments: Trading securities consist of auction rate securities accounted for in accordance with authoritative guidance for investments in debt and equity securities. Trading securities are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. Securities purchased to be held for indeterminate periods of time and not intended at the time of purchase to be held until maturity are classified as available-for-sale securities with any unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive loss on our consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s management continually evaluates whether any marketable investments have been impaired and, if so, whether such impairment is temporary or other than temporary.

Our investments consisted of two auction rate securities (“ARS”) totaling $7.5 million of par value, $5.0 million was collateralized by Indiana Secondary Market Municipal Bond — 1998 (“Indiana ARS”) and $2.5 million was collateralized by Primus Financial Products Subordinated Deferrable Interest Notes (“Primus ARS”). ARS are securities that are structured with short-term interest rate reset dates which generally occur every 28 days and are linked to LIBOR. At the reset date, investors can attempt to sell via auction or continue to hold the securities at par. The Company’s ARS are reported at fair value.

Table of Contents

NOTE B - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Fair Value (continued)

The fair values of our ARS were estimated through use of discounted cash flow models. These models consider, among other things, the timing of expected future successful auctions, collateralization of underlying security investments and the credit worthiness of the issuer. Since these inputs are not observable in an active market, they are classified as Level 3 inputs under the fair value accounting rules discussed above under “Fair Value”.

On November 4, 2008, the Company agreed to accept Auction Rate Security Rights (“the Rights”) related to the Indiana ARS from UBS offered through a prospectus filed on October 7, 2008. The Rights permit the Company to sell, or put, the Indiana ARS back to UBS at par value of $5.0 million, at any time during the period from June 30, 2010 through July 2, 2012 and to obtain a credit line from UBS collateralized by the ARS. The Company elected to classify the Rights and our investments in the Indiana ARS as trading securities in accordance with the authoritative guidance for accounting for investments in debt and equity securities.

In May 2010, the Company sold its investment in the Primus ARS for $1.5 million in cash proceeds. The Company recognized a loss on the sale of the auction rate securities of $0.2 million, which is the difference between the amortized cost basis of $1.7 million and the cash proceeds of $1.5 million received from the sale of the Primus ARS. The loss was reported in other expense on the Company’s income statement.

On July 1, 2010, the Company exercised its right to put the ARS back to UBS at par value of $5.0 million. The $5.0 proceeds were received on July 1, 2010. As part of the settlement, the Company closed out a $3.6 million line of credit with UBS that the Company obtained as part of the buyback agreement originally executed in November 2008, with net cash proceeds of approximately $1.4 million. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company determined the fair value of the Rights was $0 and $0.3 million, respectively, and the fair value of the ARS was $0 and $4.7 million, respectively. The change in the fair value of the Rights and the ARS during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 are reflected as components of earnings.

Interest Rate Swaps: The Company utilizes interest rate swaps to manage its exposures to interest rate risk associated with the Company’s variable rate borrowings. The authoritative guidance for derivatives and hedging requires companies to recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. In accordance with the authoritative guidance, the Company designates the interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of variable-rate borrowings. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in earnings.

Table of Contents

NOTE B - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Fair Value (continued)

In May 2008, the Company entered into two interest rate swap agreements under which $150.0 million of the Company’s variable rate term loans were converted to a fixed rate of 5.4%. The fair value of each interest rate swap is an estimate of the present value of the expected future cash flows the Company is to receive under the applicable interest rate swap agreement. The valuation models used to determine the fair value of the interest rate swaps are based upon the forward yield curve of one month LIBOR (Level 2 inputs), the hedged interest rate, and other factors including counterparty credit risk. The agreements, which expire April 2011, qualify as cash flow hedges in accordance with the authoritative guidance for derivatives and hedging for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. The Company’s interest rate swaps qualified for hedge accounting, so any adjustments in fair value related to the effective portion of the interest rate swaps were not required to be recognized through the income statement.

Since their inception, the fair value of the interest rate swaps has declined to $2.7 million. Of the decline, $2.2 million related to the effective portion of the interest rate swaps and was reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss on our consolidated balance sheets. The total liability, $2.7 million, is reported in accrued expenses on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2010. As of December 31, 2009, liabilities from the interest rate swap were $5.3 million, with $4.4 million reported in accrued expenses, with the remainder reported in other liabilities. Of the $5.3 million in liabilities reported as of December 31, 2009, $4.8 million of the decline was related to the effective portion of the interest rate swaps and was reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss on our consolidated balance sheets.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of the Company’s short-term financial instruments, such as receivables and payables, approximate their fair values, based on the short-term maturities of these instruments. The carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt, excluding the Senior Notes, approximates fair value based on rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. The fair value of the Senior Notes, at September 30, 2010, was $183.1 million, as compared to the carrying value of $175.0 million at that date. The fair values of the Senior Notes were based on quoted market prices at September 30, 2010.

Revenue Recognition

Revenues in our patient care centers are derived from the sale of orthotic and prosthetic (“O&P”) devices and the maintenance and repair of existing devices. The sale of O&P devices includes the design, fabrication, assembly, fitting and delivery of a wide range of braces, limbs and other

Table of Contents

NOTE B - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Revenue Recognition (continued)

devices. Revenues from the sale of these devices are recorded when (i) acceptance by and delivery to the patient has occurred; (ii) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and there are no further obligations to the patients; (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured. Revenues from maintenance and repairs are recognized when the service is provided. Revenues from the sale of O&P devices to customers by our distribution segment are recorded upon the shipment of products, in accordance with the terms of the invoice, net of merchandise returns received and the amount established for anticipated returns. Discounted sales are recorded at net realizable value.

Revenue at the patient-care centers segment is recorded net of all contractual adjustments and discounts. The Company employs a systematic process to ensure that sales are recorded at net realizable value and that any required adjustments are recorded on a timely basis. The contracting module of our centralized, computerized billing system is designed to record revenue at net realizable value based on our contract with the patient’s insurance company. Updated billing information is received periodically from payors and is uploaded into our centralized contract module and then disseminated, electronically, to all patient-care centers.

Disallowed sales generally relate to billings to payors with whom the Company does not have a formal contract. In these situations the Company records the sale at usual and customary rates and simultaneously recognizes a disallowed sale to reduce the sale to net value, based on its historical experience with the payor in question. Disallowed sales may also result if the payor rejects or adjusts certain billing codes. Billing codes are frequently updated. As soon as updates are received, the Company reflects the change in its centralized billing system.

As part of the Company’s preauthorization process with payors, it validates its ability to bill the payor, if applicable, for the service provided before the delivery of the device. Subsequent to billing for devices and services, there may be problems with pre-authorization or with other insurance coverage issues with payors. If there has been a lapse in coverage, the patient is financially responsible for the charges related to the devices and services received. If the Company is unable to collect from the patient, a bad debt expense is recognized.

Occasionally, a portion of a bill is rejected by a payor due to a coding error on the Company’s part and the Company is prevented from pursuing payment from the patient due to the terms of its contract with the insurance company. The Company appeals these types of decisions and is generally successful. This activity is factored into the Company’s methodology of determining the estimate for the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company recognizes, as reduction of sales, a disallowed sale for any claims that it believes will not be recovered and adjusts future estimates accordingly.

Certain accounts receivable may be uncollectible, even if properly pre-authorized and billed. Regardless of the balance, accounts receivable amounts are periodically evaluated to assess

Table of Contents

NOTE B - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Revenue Recognition (continued)

collectibility. In addition to the actual bad debt expense recognized during collection activities, the Company estimates the amount of potential bad debt expense that may occur in the future. This estimate is based upon historical experience as well as a review of the receivable balances.

On a quarterly basis, the Company evaluates cash collections, accounts receivable balances and write-off activity to assess the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Additionally, a Company-wide evaluation of collectibility of receivable balances older than 180 days is performed at least semi-annually, the results of which are used in the next allowance analysis. In these detailed reviews, the account’s net realizable value is estimated after considering the customer’s payment history, past efforts to collect on the balance and the outstanding balance, and a specific reserve is recorded if needed. From time to time, the Company may outsource the collection of such accounts to outsourced agencies after internal collection efforts are exhausted. In the cases when valid accounts receivable cannot be collected, the uncollectible account is written off to bad debt expense.

Segment Information

The Company applies a “management” approach to disclosure of segment information. The management approach designates the internal organization that is used by management for making operating decisions and assessing performance as the basis of the Company’s reportable segments. The description of the Company’s reportable segments and the disclosure of segment information are presented in Note L.

New Accounting Guidance

In January 2010, the FASB issued additional authoritative guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures. This includes the disclosure of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 measurements and describing the reasons for the transfers, reporting of information separately for purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements within Level 3 measurements, level of disaggregation, and input and valuation techniques. The additional authoritative guidance, except for the reporting of information within Level 3 measurements was effective January 1, 2010. The adoption of the additional guidance on January 1, 2010 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The additional authoritative guidance for the reporting of activity for purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements within Level 3 measurements is effective January 1, 2011. The Company believes the impact of the additional authoritative guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures for Level 3 measurements will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

NOTE C - SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The supplemental disclosure requirements for the statements of cash flows are as follows:

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
(In thousands)	2010		2009
	(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	16,835	$	17,641
Income taxes	$	13,282	$	13,199

Non-cash financing and investing activities:
Unrealized loss on auction rate securities	$	—	$	(174	)
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps	$	1,514	$	550
Issuance of notes in connection with acquistions	$	2,700	$	1,641
Issuance of restricted shares of common stock	$	9,462	$	1,541

NOTE D — ACQUISITIONS

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the revised authoritative guidance for business combinations, which provides revised guidance to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a business combination and its effects.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company acquired three entities consisting of five new patient care centers for a purchase price of $11.4 million, consisting of $7.0 million in cash, $2.7 million in promissory notes, and $1.7 million in contingent consideration payable within the next two years. The Company recorded approximately $9.0 million of goodwill and incurred approximately $0.1 million of transaction costs related to these acquisitions. Pro forma results would not be materially different.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 the Company acquired two entities consisting of five patient care centers for an aggregate purchase price of $3.9 million, consisting of $2.2 million in cash, $0.9 million in promissory notes, and $0.8 million in contingent consideration payable within the next two years. The Company recorded approximately $3.5 million of goodwill and incurred approximately $0.1 million of transaction costs related to these acquisitions. The results of operations for these acquisitions are included in the Company’s results of operations from the date of acquisition. Pro forma results would not be materially different.

Table of Contents

NOTE D — ACQUISITIONS (CONTINUED)

In connection with contingent consideration agreements with acquisitions completed prior to adoption of the revised authoritative guidance for business combinations becoming effective, the Company made payments of $1.3 million and $0.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company has accounted for these amounts as additional purchase price, resulting in an increase in goodwill. The Company estimates that it may pay up to a total of $6.7 million related to contingent consideration provisions of acquisitions in future periods. Of the $6.7 million, $4.0 million is related to acquisitions completed after adoption of the revised authoritative guidance.

On October 18, 2010, we announced the definitive agreement to purchase Accelerated Care Plus Corporation (‘‘ACP’’) for $155.0 million in cash. We intend to finance this transaction through cash on hand and a concurrent refinancing of our senior credit facilities. See Note G for further discussion of refinancing. ACP is the nation’s leading provider of integrated clinical programs for sub-acute and long-term care rehabilitation providers and having contracts to serve more than 4,000 out of a total market of approximately 15,000 skilled nursing facilities (SNF) nationwide, including 22 of the 25 largest national providers. ACP’s unique value proposition is to provide its customers with a full-service “total solutions” approach encompassing proven medical technology, evidence-based clinical programs, and continuous onsite therapist education and training. Their services support increasingly-advanced treatment options for a broader patient population and more medically-complex conditions. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions and is expected to close before the end of 2010.

Table of Contents

NOTE E - GOODWILL

The Company determined that it has two reporting units with goodwill, which are the same as its reportable segments: (i) patient-care centers and (ii) distribution. The Company completes its annual goodwill impairment analysis in October. The fair value of the Company’s reporting units are primarily determined based on the income approach and considers the market and cost approach.

The activity related to goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:

	Patient-Care Centers
(In thousands)	Goodwill		Accumulated Impairment Loss			Net		Distribution Goodwill		Total
Balance at December 31, 2009	$	491,842	$	(45,808	)	$	446,034	$	38,388	$	484,422
Additions due to acquisitions	9,007		—			9,007		—		9,007
Additions due to contingent considerations	970		—			970		—		970
Balance at September 30, 2010	$	501,819	$	(45,808	)	$	456,011	$	38,388	$	494,399

	Patient-Care Centers
(In thousands)	Goodwill		Accumulated Impairment Loss			Net		Distribution Goodwill		Total
Balance at December 31, 2008	$	477,831	$	(45,808	)	$	432,023	$	38,388	$	470,411
Additions due to acquisitions	5,434		—			5,434		—		5,434
Additions due to contingent considerations	223		—			223		—		223
Balance at September 30, 2009	$	483,488	$	(45,808	)	$	437,680	$	38,388	$	476,068

NOTE F — INVENTORIES

Inventories, which are recorded at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out method, were as follows:

	September 30,		December 31,
(In thousands)	2010		2009
	(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)

Raw materials	$	34,754	$	34,157
Work-in-process	44,268		38,814
Finished goods	19,584		18,318
	$	98,606	$	91,289

Table of Contents

NOTE G — LONG TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consists of the following:

	September 30,			December 31,
(In thousands)	2010			2009
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Revolving Credit Facility	$	—		$	—
Line of Credit	—			3,628
Term Loan	220,225			221,956
10 1/4% Senior Notes due 2014	175,000			175,000
Subordinated seller notes, non-collateralized, net of unamortized discount with principal and interest payable in either monthly, quarterly or annual installments at effective interest rates ranging from 3.00% to 7.00%, maturing through October 2014	10,104			9,888
	405,329			410,472
Less current portion	(6,238		)	(8,835		)
	$	399,091		$	401,637

Revolving Credit Facility

The $75.0 million Revolving Credit Facility (the “Facility”) matures on May 26, 2011 and bears interest, at the Company’s option, at LIBOR plus 2.75% or a Base Rate (as defined in the credit agreement) plus 1.75%. The obligations under the Facility are guaranteed by the Company’s subsidiaries and are secured by a first priority perfected interest in the Company’s subsidiaries’ shares, all of the Company’s assets and all the assets of the Company’s subsidiaries. The Company was notified by Lehman Commercial Paper, Inc. (“LCPI”), a subsidiary of Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (“Lehman”) that they were unable to continue their commitment under the Facility. LCPI’s total commitment was $17.8 million of our total $75.0 million dollar facility. On October 23, 2009, Barclays Bank PLC replaced $10.0 million of the $17.8 million defaulted Lehman commitment under the Facility. The Facility requires compliance with various covenants including but not limited to a maximum total leverage ratio of 6.5 times EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement) and a maximum annual capital expenditures limit of $50.0 million, plus an unused portion of such amount from the previous fiscal year. As of September 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants and had $63.5 million available under the Facility, net of LCPI’s remaining $7.8 million commitment and $3.7 million of outstanding letters of credit.

Line of Credit

On April 6, 2009, the Company obtained a collateralized line of credit from UBS in conjunction with the Rights agreement. The credit line was collateralized by our Indiana ARS and allowed the Company to borrow up to the fair market value of the ARS not to exceed its $5.0 million par value. The Company had drawn $3.6 million, which was the maximum currently allowed under the agreement. The credit line has no net cost to the Company as it bears interest in the amount equal to the income on the ARS. On July 1, 2010, the Company settled the $3.6 million line of credit with UBS in conjunction with settling the Rights agreement.

Table of Contents

NOTE G — LONG TERM DEBT (CONTINUED)

Term Loan

The $230.0 million Term Loan matures on May 26, 2013 and requires quarterly principal and interest payments that commenced on September 30, 2006. From time to time, mandatory payments may be required as a result of capital stock issuances, additional debt incurrences, asset sales or other events as defined in the credit agreement. The obligations under the Term Loan are guaranteed by the Company’s subsidiaries and are secured by a first priority perfected interest in the Company’s subsidiaries’ shares, all of the Company’s assets and all the assets of the Company’s subsidiaries. The Term Loan is subject to covenants that mirror those of the Revolving Credit Facility. The Company secured, effective March 13, 2007, certain amendments to the Term Loan that included reducing the margin over LIBOR that the Company pays as interest under the existing Term Loan from 2.50% to 2.00%. The Term Loan bears interest, at the Company’s option, at LIBOR plus 2.00% or a Base Rate (as defined in the credit agreement) plus 1.00%. At September 30, 2010, the interest rate on the Term Loan was 2.26%.

10 ¼% Senior Notes

The 10 ¼% Senior Notes, entered into on May 26, 2006, mature June 1, 2014, are senior indebtedness and are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by all of the Company’s current and future domestic subsidiaries. Interest is payable semi-annually on June 1 and December 1, and commenced on December 1, 2006.

The notes were not redeemable at the Company’s option prior to June 1, 2010. On or after June 1, 2010, the Company may redeem all or part of the notes upon not less than 30 days and no more than 60 days’ notice, for the twelve-month period beginning on June 1 of the following years; at (i) 105.125% through May 31, 2011; (ii) 102.563% through May 31, 2012; and (iii) 100.0% beginning June 1, 2013 and thereafter through June 1, 2014.

Debt Covenants

The terms of the Senior Notes, the Revolving Credit Facility, and the Term Loan limit the Company’s ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, create liens, pay dividends on or redeem capital stock, make certain investments, make restricted payments, make certain dispositions of assets, engage in transactions with affiliates, engage in certain business activities and engage in mergers, consolidations and certain sales of assets. At September 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under these debt agreements.

Refinance

On November 2, 2010 we issued $200.0 million of 7 1/8% Senior Notes due 2018 and used a portion of the proceeds to retire the $175.0 million of 10 ¼% Senior Notes due 2014 and to pay approximately $14.3 million in fees related to the transaction, with the remainder to be used for general corporate purposes. The 7 1/8% Senior Notes are senior indebtedness and are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by all of our current and future domestic subsidiaries. Interest is payable May 15th and November 15th of each year. In conjunction with this transaction, the

Table of Contents

NOTE G — LONG TERM DEBT (CONTINUED)

Refinance (Continued)

Company will incur a loss on the extinguishment of the 10 ¼% Senior Notes of approximately $11.5 million.

NOTE H — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Commitments

The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Innovative Neurotronics, Inc. (“IN, Inc.”), is party to a non-binding purchase agreement under which it agreed to purchase assembled WalkAide System kits. As of September 30, 2010, IN, Inc. had outstanding purchase commitments of approximately $1.2 million that the Company expects to be fulfilled over the next three months.

Contingencies

The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims which arise from time to time in the ordinary course of its business, including additional payments under business purchase agreements. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability, if any, with respect to these actions will not have a materially adverse effect on the financial position, liquidity or results of operations of the Company.

The Company is also in a highly regulated industry and receives regulatory agency inquiries from time to time in the ordinary course of its business, including inquiries relating to the Company’s billing activities. To date, these inquiries have not resulted in material liabilities, but no assurance can be given that future regulatory agencies’ inquiries will be consistent with the results to date or that any discrepancies identified during a regulatory review will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Guarantees and Indemnifications

In the ordinary course of its business, the Company may enter into service agreements with service providers in which it agrees to indemnify or limit the service provider against certain losses and liabilities arising from the service provider’s performance of the agreement. The

Table of Contents

NOTE H — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (CONTINUED)

Guarantees and Indemnifications (Continued)

Company has reviewed its existing contracts containing indemnification clauses or guarantees and does not believe that its liability under such agreements will result in any material liability.

NOTE I — NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

Basic per common share amounts are computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted per common share amounts are computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period and dilutive potential common shares. Dilutive potential common shares consist of stock options and restricted shares, and are calculated using the treasury stock method.

Net income per share is computed as follows:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
(In thousands, except share and per share data)	2010		2009		2010		2009
	(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)

Net income	$	6,924	$	9,642	$	20,689	$	24,193

Shares of common stock outstanding used to compute basic per common share amounts	32,377,237		31,578,889		32,097,084		31,263,458
Effect of dilutive restricted stock and options (1)	489,250		635,432		687,395		675,155
Shares used to compute dilutive per common share amounts	32,866,487		32,214,321		32,784,479		31,938,613

Basic income per share	$	0.21	$	0.31	$	0.64	$	0.77
Diluted income per share	$	0.21	$	0.30	$	0.63	$	0.76

(1) For both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, options to purchase 605,728 shares of common stock are not included in the computation of diluted income per share as these options are anti-dilutive because the exercise prices of the options were greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock for the period. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, options to purchase 228,023 shares of common stock are not included in the computation of diluted income per share as the options are anti-dilutive. There were no anti-dilutive options for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

NOTE J — SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

The Company’s unfunded noncontributory defined benefit plan (the “Plan”) covers certain senior executives, is administered by the Company and calls for annual payments upon retirement based on years of service and final average salary. Benefit costs and liabilities balances are calculated based on certain assumptions including benefits earned, discount rates, interest costs, mortality rates and other factors. Actual results that differ from the assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods, affecting the recorded obligation and expense in future periods.

Table of Contents

NOTE J — SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN (CONTINUED)

The following assumptions were used in the calculation of the net benefit cost and obligation at September 30, 2010:

Discount rate		5.50	%
Average rate of increase in compensation		3.25	%

The Company believes the assumptions used are appropriate, however, changes in assumptions or differences in actual experience may affect our benefit obligation and future expenses. The change in the Plan’s net benefit obligation is as follows:

	(In thousands)

Net benefit cost accrued at December 31, 2009	$	14,138
Service cost	1,247
Interest cost	602
Net benefit cost accrued at September 30, 2010 (unaudited)	$	15,987

NOTE K - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company utilizes the authoritative guidance using the modified prospective method. Under the modified prospective method, compensation expense related to awards granted prior to and unvested as of the adoption of the authoritative guidance is calculated in accordance with the authoritative guidance and recognized in the consolidated statements of operations over the requisite remaining service period; compensation expense for all awards granted after the adoption of the authoritative guidance is calculated according to the provisions of such guidance.

The Company has issued options and restricted shares of common stock under two share-based compensation plans, one for employees and the other for the Board of Directors. On May 13, 2010, the stockholders of the Company approved the 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”) and terminated the Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Incentive and Bonus Plan (the “2002 Plan”) and 2003 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Incentive Plan (the “2003 Plan”). No new awards will be granted under the 2002 Plan or the 2003 Plan; however, awards granted under either the 2002 Plan or the 2003 Plan that were outstanding will remain outstanding and continue to be subject to all of the terms and conditions of the 2002 Plan or the 2003 Plan.

The 2010 Plan provides that 2.5 million shares of Common Stock are reserved for issuance, subject to adjustment as set forth in the 2010 Plan; provided, however, that only 1.5 million shares may be issued pursuant to the exercise of incentive stock options. Of these 2.5 million shares, 2.0 million are shares that are newly authorized for issuance under the 2010 Plan and 0.5 million are unissued shares not subject to awards that have been carried over from the shares previously authorized for issuance under the terms of the 2002 Plan and the 2003 Plan. Unless earlier terminated by the Board of Directors, the 2010 Plan will remain in effect until the earlier of (i) the date that is ten years from the date the plan is approved by the Company’s stockholders, which is the effective date for the plan, namely May 13, 2020, or (ii) the date all shares reserved for issuance have been issued.

Table of Contents

NOTE K - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)

At September 30, 2010, of the 2.5 million shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the Company’s 2010 Plan, approximately 0.1 million shares have been issued.

Total unrecognized share-based compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards was approximately $11.8 million at September 30, 2010, and is expected to be expensed as compensation expense over approximately three years. The Company had no unrecognized expense related to its stock option grants for the periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company has included approximately $5.9 million and $5.4 million, respectively, for share-based compensation cost in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income for the 2002 and 2003 Plans. Compensation expense primarily relates to restricted share grants, as the amount of expense related to options is immaterial in all periods presented. The Company calculates the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes model. The total value of the stock option awards is expensed ratably over the requisite service period of the employees receiving the awards.

NOTE L — SEGMENT AND RELATED INFORMATION

The Company has identified two reportable segments in which it operates based on the products and services it provides. The Company evaluates segment performance and allocates resources based on the segments’ income from operations.

The reportable segments are: (i) patient-care services and (ii) distribution. The reportable segments are described further below:

Patient-Care Services — This segment consists of the Company’s owned and operated patient-care centers and fabrication centers of O&P components. The patient-care centers provide services to design and fit O&P devices to patients. These centers also instruct patients in the use, care and maintenance of the devices. Fabrication centers are involved in the fabrication of O&P components for both the O&P industry and the Company’s own patient-care centers.

Distribution — This segment distributes O&P products and components to both the O&P industry and the Company’s own patient-care practices.

Other — This consists of Hanger Corporate, Innovative Neurotronics, Inc. (IN, Inc.) and Linkia. IN, Inc. specializes in bringing emerging MyoOrthotics Technologies® to the O&P market.

MyoOrthotics Technologies represents the merging of orthotic technologies with electrical stimulation. Linkia is a national managed-care agent for O&P services and a patient referral clearing house.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of “Significant Accounting Policies” in Note B to the consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

NOTE L — SEGMENT AND RELATED INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments is shown in the following table. Intersegment sales mainly include sales of O&P components from the distribution segment to the patient-care centers segment and were made at prices which approximate market values.

(In thousands)	Patient-Care Centers			Distribution		Other			Consolidating Adjustments			Total
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
Net sales
Customers	$	180,721		$	25,459	$	569		$	—		$	206,749
Intersegments	—			44,016		870			(44,886		)	—
Depreciation and amortization	2,746			248		1,477			—			4,471
Income (loss) from operations	33,676			8,437		(23,840		)	42			18,315
Interest (income) expense	7,096			848		(308		)	—			7,636
Income (loss) before taxes	26,580			7,589		(23,532		)	42			10,679

Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
Net sales
Customers	$	168,951		$	23,049	$	296		$	—		$	192,296
Intersegments	—			40,025		992			(41,017		)	—
Depreciation and amortization	2,528			225		1,249			—			4,002
Income (loss) from operations	31,130			7,066		(14,392		)	(42		)	23,762
Interest (income) expense	(1,621		)	1,761		7,552			—			7,692
Income (loss) before taxes	32,751			5,305		(21,944		)	(42		)	16,070

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
Net sales
Customers	$	517,927		$	71,506	$	1,441		$	—		$	590,874
Intersegments	—			125,452		2,989			(128,441		)	—
Depreciation and amortization	8,364			750		4,128			—			13,242
Income (loss) from operations	93,732			22,299		(60,357		)	2			55,676
Interest (income) expense	21,278			2,554		(1,148		)	—			22,684
Income (loss) before taxes	72,454			19,745		(59,209		)	2			32,992

Capital expenditures	12,182			878		6,683			—			19,743

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
Net sales
Customers	$	487,906		$	65,919	$	1,141		$	—		$	554,966
Intersegments	—			113,436		2,067			(115,503		)	—
Depreciation and amortization	7,704			664		3,897			—			12,265
Income (loss) from operations	87,942			19,567		(44,535		)	75			63,049
Interest (income) expense	(4,842		)	5,300		22,436			—			22,894
Income (loss) before taxes	92,784			14,267		(66,804		)	75			40,322

Capital expenditures	10,675			438		1,562			—			12,675

Total Assets
September 30, 2010	979,078			141,331		(216,849		)	—			903,560
December 31, 2009	821,988			119,989		(66,941		)	—			875,036

Table of Contents

NOTE M — CORPORATE OFFICE RELOCATION

The Company has moved its corporate headquarters from Bethesda, Maryland to Austin, Texas during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. In conjunction with the move, the Company has incurred employee separation costs, other relocation costs, and lease termination costs. Employee separation costs are expensed pro-ratably over the requisite service period. The Company incurred employee separation costs of $0.4 million and $3.7 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 respectively. The Company anticipates these costs will be paid to employees over the next twelve months. Other relocation costs totaled $2.5 million and $5.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. These costs are expensed when incurred and the Company anticipates incurring up to an additional $2.0 million over the next three to six months. As of September 30, 2010 the Company abandoned its lease premises in Bethesda, Maryland and has recorded a lease termination liability of $5.0 million, net of anticipated sub-lease recoveries. The lease termination cost will be paid out over the remaining term of the lease which expires in September 30, 2014.

The following is a summary of the relocation liabilities to be paid in future periods:

(in thousands)	Employee Separation			Lease Termination		Total
Balance as of December 31, 2009 (unaudited)	$	—		$	—	$	—
Amounts expensed	3,673			5,028		8,701
Amounts paid	(861		)	—		(861		)
Balance as of September 30, 2010 (unaudited)	$	2,812		$	5,028	$	7,840

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

The following is a discussion of our results of operations and financial condition for the periods described below. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report. Our discussion of our results of operations and financial condition includes various forward-looking statements about our markets, the demand for our products and services and our future results. These statements are based on our current expectations, which are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties. Refer to risk factors disclosed in Part II, Item 1A of this filing as well as the risk factors disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for further discussion of risks and uncertainties. Our actual results and the timing of certain events may differ materially from those indicated in the forward looking statements.

Business Overview

General

Hanger Orthopedic Group, Inc. (the “Company”) is the largest owner and operator of orthotic and prosthetic (“O&P”) patient-care centers, (“patient-care centers”), accounting for approximately 27% of the estimated $2.6 billion O&P patient-care market in the United States. At September 30, 2010, the Company operated in excess of 675 O&P patient-care centers in 45 states and the District of Columbia with over 3,800 employees including over 1,100 revenue-generating O&P practitioners (“practitioners”). In addition, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Southern Prosthetic Supply, Inc. (“SPS”), we are the largest distributor of branded and private label O&P devices and components in the United States, all of which are manufactured by third parties. We also introduce new technologies, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Innovative Neurotronics, Inc. (“IN, Inc.”) for patients who have had a loss of mobility due to strokes, multiple sclerosis or other similar conditions. Another subsidiary, Linkia LLC (“Linkia”), develops programs to manage all aspects of O&P patient care for large private payors.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, our net sales were $206.7 million and $590.9 million, respectively, and the Company recorded net income of $6.9 million and $20.7 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, our net sales were $192.3 million and $555.0 million, respectively, and the Company recorded net income of $9.6 million and $24.2 million, respectively.

The Company conducts its operations primarily in two reportable segments — patient-care services and distribution. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, net sales attributable to our patient-care services segment and distribution segment were $180.7 million and $25.5 million, respectively. See Note L to our consolidated financial statements contained herein for further information related to our segments.

Table of Contents

Industry Overview

The Company estimates that the United States O&P patient care market is approximately $2.6 billion, of which the Company accounts for approximately 27%. The O&P patient care services market is highly fragmented and is characterized by local, independent O&P businesses, with the majority generally having a single facility with annual revenues of less than $1.0 million. We do not believe that any of our patient care competitors account for a market share of more than 2% of the country’s total estimated O&P patient care services revenue.

The care of O&P patients is part of a continuum of rehabilitation services including diagnosis, treatment and prevention of future injury. This continuum involves the integration of several medical disciplines that begins with the attending physician’s diagnosis. A patient’s course of treatment is generally determined by an orthopedic surgeon, vascular surgeon or physiatrist, who writes a prescription and refers the patient to an O&P patient care services provider for treatment. A practitioner then, using the prescription, consults with both the referring physician and the patient to formulate the design of an orthotic or prosthetic device to meet the patient’s needs.

The O&P industry is characterized by stable, recurring revenues, primarily resulting from the need for periodic replacement and modification of O&P devices. Based on our experience, the average replacement time for orthotic devices is one to three years, while the average replacement time for prosthetic devices is three to five years. There is also an attendant need for continuing O&P patient care services. In addition to the inherent need for periodic replacement and modification of O&P devices and continuing care, we expect the demand for O&P services will continue to grow as a result of several key trends, including:

Aging U.S. Population. The growth rate of the over-65 age group is nearly triple that of the under-65 age group. There is a direct correlation between age and the onset of diabetes and vascular disease, which are the leading causes of amputations. With broader medical insurance coverage, increasing disposable income, longer life expectancy, greater mobility expectations and improved technology of O&P devices, we believe the elderly will increasingly seek orthopedic rehabilitation services and products.

Growing Physical Health Consciousness. The emphasis on physical fitness, leisure sports and conditioning, such as running and aerobics, is growing, which has led to increased injuries requiring orthopedic rehabilitative services and products. These trends are evidenced by the increasing demand for new devices that provide support for injuries, prevent further or new injuries or enhance physical performance.

Increased Efforts to Reduce Healthcare Costs. O&P services and devices have enabled patients to become ambulatory more quickly after receiving medical treatment in the hospital. We believe that significant cost savings can be achieved through the early use of O&P services and products. The provision of O&P services and products in many cases reduces the need for more expensive treatments, thus representing a cost savings to third-party payors.

Advancing Technology. The range and effectiveness of treatment options for patients requiring O&P services have increased in connection with the technological sophistication of O&P devices. Advances in design technology and lighter, stronger and more cosmetically acceptable

Table of Contents

materials have enabled patients to replace older O&P devices with new O&P products that provide greater comfort, protection and patient acceptability. As a result, treatment can be more effective or of shorter duration, giving the patient greater mobility and a more active lifestyle. Advancing technology has also increased the prevalence and visibility of O&P devices in many sports, including skiing, running and tennis.

Business Strategy

Our goal is to continue to provide superior patient care and to be the most cost-efficient, full service, national O&P operator. The key elements of our strategy to achieve this goal are to:

· Improve our performance by:

· developing and deploying new processes to improve the productivity of our practitioners;

· continuing periodic patient evaluations to gauge patients’ device and service satisfaction;

· improving the utilization and efficiency of administrative and corporate support services;

· enhancing margins through continued consolidation of vendors and product offering; and

· leveraging our market share to increase sales and enter into more competitive payor contracts;

· Increase our market share and net sales by:

· continued marketing of Linkia to regional and national providers and contracting with national and regional managed care providers who we believe select us as a preferred O&P provider because of our reputation, national reach, density of our patient-care centers in certain markets and our ability to monitor quality and outcomes as well as reducing administrative expenses;

· increasing our volume of business through enhanced comprehensive marketing programs aimed at referring physicians and patients, such as our Patient Evaluation Clinics program, which reminds patients to have their devices serviced or replaced and informs them of technological improvements of which they can take advantage; and our “People in Motion” program which introduces potential patients to the latest O&P technology;

· expanding the breadth of products being offered out of our patient-care centers; and

· developing new distribution channels to sell our existing products;

Table of Contents

· Develop businesses that provide services and products to the broader rehabilitation and post-surgical healthcare areas;

· Continue to create, license or patent and market devices based on new cutting edge technology;

· Selectively acquire small and medium-sized O&P patient care service businesses and open satellite patient-care centers primarily to expand our presence within an existing market and secondarily to enter into new markets; and

· Provide our practitioners with:

· the training necessary to utilize existing technology for different patient service facets, such as the use of our Insignia scanning system for burns and cranial helmets;

· career development and increased compensation opportunities;

· a wide array of O&P products from which to choose;

· administrative and corporate support services that enable them to focus their time on providing superior patient care; and

· selective application of new technology to improve patient care.

Business Description

Patient Care Services

In our orthotics business, we design, fabricate, fit and maintain a wide range of standard and custom-made braces and other devices (such as spinal, knee and sports-medicine braces) that provide external support to patients suffering from musculoskeletal disorders, such as ailments of the back, extremities or joints and injuries from sports or other activities. In our prosthetics business, we design, fabricate, fit and maintain custom-made artificial limbs for patients who are without limbs as a result of traumatic injuries, vascular diseases, diabetes, cancer or congenital disorders. O&P devices are increasingly technologically advanced and are custom-designed to add functionality and comfort to patients’ lives, shorten the rehabilitation process and lower the cost of rehabilitation.

Patients are referred to our local patient-care centers directly by physicians as a result of our reputation with them or through our agreements with managed care providers. Practitioners, technicians and office administrators staff our patient-care centers. Our practitioners generally design and fit patients with, and the technicians fabricate, O&P devices as prescribed by the referring physician. Following the initial design, fabrication and fitting of our O&P devices, our technicians conduct regular, periodic maintenance of O&P devices as needed.

Table of Contents

Our practitioners are also responsible for managing and operating our patient-care centers and are compensated, in part, based on their success in managing costs and collecting accounts receivable. The Company provides centralized administrative, marketing and materials management services to take advantage of economies of scale and to increase the time practitioners have to provide patient care. In areas where we have multiple patient-care centers, we also utilize shared fabrication facilities where technicians fabricate devices for practitioners in that region.

Distribution Services

The Company distributes O&P components to the O&P market as a whole and to our own patient-care centers through our wholly-owned subsidiary, SPS, which is the nation’s largest O&P distributor. SPS maintains an inventory of over 28,000 O&P related items, all of which are manufactured by other companies. SPS maintains distribution facilities in California, Florida, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Texas, which allows us to deliver products via ground shipment anywhere in the United States within two business days.

Our distribution business enables us to:

· lower our material costs by negotiating purchasing discounts from manufacturers;

· reduce our patient-care center inventory levels and improve inventory turns through centralized purchasing control;

· quickly access prefabricated and finished O&P products;

· perform inventory quality control;

· encourage our patient-care centers to use clinically appropriate products that enhance our profit margins; and

· coordinate new product development efforts with key vendor “partners”.

This is accomplished at competitive prices as a result of our direct purchases from manufacturers. Marketing of our distribution services is conducted on a national basis through a dedicated sales force, print and e-commerce catalogues and exhibits at industry and medical meetings and conventions. The Company directs specialized catalogues to segments of the healthcare industry, such as orthopedic surgeons, physical and occupational therapists, and podiatrists.

Product Development

IN, Inc. specializes in product development principally in the field of functional electrical stimulation. IN, Inc. identifies emerging MyoOrthotics Technologies® developed at research centers and universities throughout the world that use neuromuscular stimulation to improve the functionality of an impaired limb. MyoOrthotics Technologies® represents the merging of orthotic technologies with electrical stimulation. Working with the inventors under licensing and consulting agreements, IN, Inc. commercializes the design, obtains regulatory approvals, develops clinical protocols for the technology, and then introduces the devices to the marketplace

Table of Contents

through a variety of distribution channels. IN, Inc’s. first product, the WalkAide System (“WalkAide”), has received FDA approval, achieved ISO 13485:2004 and ISO 9001:2000 certification, as well as the European CE Mark, which are widely accepted quality management standards for medical devices and related services. Additionally, in September 2007, the WalkAide earned the esteemed da Vinci Award for Adaptive Technologies from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society which honors outstanding engineering achievements in adaptive and assistive technology that provide solutions to accessibility issues for people with disabilities. In November 2008, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services overturned a non-coverage decision and assigned a specific E-code to the WalkAide, which is reimbursable for beneficiaries with foot drop due to incomplete spinal cord injuries. The code was effective January 1, 2009. The Company continues to work on clinical trials to qualify the device for reimbursement for stroke patients. The WalkAide is sold in the United States through our patient care centers and SPS. IN, Inc. is also marketing the WalkAide internationally through licensed distributors.

Provider Network Management

Linkia is the first provider network management service company dedicated solely to serving the O&P market. Linkia is dedicated to managing the O&P services of national and regional insurance companies. Linkia partners with healthcare insurance companies by securing a national or regional contract either as a preferred provider or to manage their O&P network of providers. Linkia’s network now totals approximately 1,000 O&P provider locations. As of September 30, 2010, Linkia had 43 contracts with national and regional providers.

Competitive Strengths

We believe the combination of the following competitive strengths will help us in growing our business through an increase in our net sales, net income and market share:

· Leading market position, with an approximate 27% share of total industry revenues and operations in 45 states and the District of Columbia, in an otherwise fragmented industry;

· National scale of operations, which has better enabled us to:

· establish our brand name and generate economies of scale;

· implement best practices throughout the Company;

· utilize shared fabrication facilities;

· contract with national and regional managed care entities;

· identify, test and deploy emerging technology; and

· increase our influence on, and input into, regulatory trends;

Table of Contents

· Distribution of, and purchasing power for, O&P components and finished O&P products, which enables us to:

· negotiate greater purchasing discounts from manufacturers and freight providers;

· reduce patient-care center inventory levels and improve inventory turns through centralized purchasing control;

· quickly access prefabricated and finished O&P products;

· promote the usage by our patient-care centers of clinically appropriate products that also enhance our profit margins;

· engage in co-marketing and O&P product development programs with suppliers; and

· expand the non-Hanger client base of our distribution segment;

· Development of leading-edge technology to be brought to market through our patient practices and licensed distributors worldwide;

· Full O&P product offering, with a balanced mix between orthotics services and products and prosthetics services and products;

· Practitioner compensation plans that financially reward practitioners for their efficient management of accounts receivable collections, labor, materials, and other costs, and encourage cooperation among our practitioners within the same local market area;

· Proven ability to rapidly incorporate technological advances in the fitting and fabrication of O&P devices;

· History of successful integration of small and medium-sized O&P business acquisitions, including 86 O&P businesses since 1997, representing over 200 patient-care centers;

· Highly trained practitioners, whom we provide with the highest level of continuing education and training through programs designed to inform them of the latest technological developments in the O&P industry, and our certification program located at the University of Connecticut;

· Experienced and committed management team; and

· Successful government relations efforts including:

· Supported our patients’ efforts to pass “The Prosthetic Parity Act” in 19 states;

· Increased Medicaid reimbursement levels in several states; and

· Created the Hanger Orthopedic Political Action Committee (The Hanger PAC).

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our analysis and discussion of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements that have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. GAAP provides the framework from which to make these estimates, assumptions and disclosures. The Company has chosen accounting policies within GAAP that management believes are appropriate to accurately and fairly report our operating results and financial position in a consistent manner. Management regularly assesses these policies in light of current and forecasted economic conditions. Our accounting policies are stated in Note B to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report. The Company believes the following accounting policies are critical to understanding our results of operations and the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements.

· Revenue Recognition: Revenues in our patient care centers are derived from the sale of orthotic and prosthetic (“O&P”) devices and the maintenance and repair of existing devices. The sale of O&P devices includes the design, fabrication, assembly, fitting and delivery of a wide range of braces, limbs and other devices. Revenues from the sale of these devices are recorded when (i) acceptance by and delivery to the patient has occurred; (ii) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and there are no further obligations to the patients; (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured. Revenues from maintenance and repairs are recognized when the service is provided. Revenues from the sale of O&P devices to customers by our distribution segment are recorded upon the shipment of products, in accordance with the terms of the invoice, net of merchandise returns received and the amount established for anticipated returns. Discounted sales are recorded at net realizable value.

Table of Contents

The following represents the composition of our accounts receivable balance by payor:

September 30, 2010 (unaudited)
(In thousands)	0-60 days		61-120 days		Over 120 days		Total
Commercial and other	$	48,271	$	9,556	$	9,138	$	66,965
Private pay	4,167		2,417		3,089		9,673
Medicaid	10,211		2,181		2,105		14,497
Medicare	22,015		2,243		1,994		26,252
VA	1,379		266		115		1,760
	$	86,043	$	16,663	$	16,441	$	119,147

December 31, 2009
(In thousands)	0-60 days		61-120 days		Over 120 days		Total
Commercial and other	$	52,768	$	9,862	$	5,587	$	68,217
Private pay	3,543		2,061		1,564		7,168
Medicaid	9,929		2,177		1,382		13,488
Medicare	22,624		1,796		1,316		25,736
VA	1,087		240		71		1,398
	$	89,951	$	16,136	$	9,920	$	116,007

Certain accounts receivable may be uncollectible, even if properly pre-authorized and billed. Regardless of the balance, accounts receivable amounts are periodically evaluated to assess collectibility. In addition to the actual bad debt expense recognized during

Table of Contents

collection activities, the Company estimates the amount of potential bad debt expense that may occur in the future. This estimate is based upon historical experience as well as a review of the receivable balances.

· Inventories: Inventories, which consist principally of raw materials, work in process and finished goods, are stated at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out method. For its patient-care centers segment, the Company calculates cost of goods sold-materials in accordance with the gross profit method for all reporting periods. The Company bases the estimates used in applying the gross profit method on the actual results of the most recently completed fiscal year and other factors, such as a change in the sales mix or changes in the trend of purchases. Cost of goods sold-materials during the interim periods are reconciled and adjusted when the annual physical inventory is taken. The Company treats these adjustments as changes in accounting estimates.

Table of Contents

the expected future cash flows the Company is to receive under the applicable interest rate swap agreement. The valuation models used to determine the fair value of the interest rate swaps are based upon the forward yield curve of one month LIBOR (Level 2 inputs), the hedged interest rate, and other factors including counterparty credit risk. The agreements, which expire April 2011, qualify as cash flow hedges in accordance with the authoritative guidance for derivatives and hedging for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. The Company’s interest rate swaps qualified for hedge accounting, so any adjustments in fair value related to the effective portion of the interest rate swaps were not required to be recognized through the income statement.

Since their inception, the fair value of the interest rate swaps has declined to $2.7 million. Of the decline, $2.2 million related to the effective portion of the interest rate swaps and was reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss on our consolidated balance sheets. The current portion of the liability, $2.7 million, is reported in accrued expenses on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2010. As of December 31, 2009, liabilities from the interest rate swap were $5.3 million, with $4.4 million reported in accrued expenses, while the remainder reported in other liabilities. Of the $5.3 million in liabilities reported as of December 31, 2009, $4.8 million of the decline was related to the effective portion of the interest rate swaps and was reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss on our consolidated balance sheets.

· Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets: Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the value assigned to net identifiable assets of purchased businesses. The Company assesses goodwill for impairment annually on October 1st, or when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the reporting units may not be recoverable. Any impairment would be recognized by a charge to operating results and a reduction in the carrying value of the intangible asset. Our annual impairment test for goodwill primarily utilizes the income approach and considers the market approach and the cost approach in determining the value of our reporting units. Non-compete agreements are recorded based on agreements entered into by us and are amortized, using the straight-line method, over their terms ranging from five to seven years. Other definite-lived intangible assets are recorded at cost and are amortized, using the straight-line method, over their estimated useful lives of up to 17 years. Whenever the facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these intangibles may not be recoverable, management reviews and assesses the future cash flows expected to be generated from the related intangible for possible impairment. Any impairment would be recognized as a charge to operating results and a reduction in the carrying value of the intangible asset. As of September 30, 2010, there were no indicators of impairment.

· Income Taxes: The Company recognizes deferred income tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements or tax returns. We account for income taxes under the liability method, whereby deferred income tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.

Table of Contents

Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce tax assets when we expect the amount of tax benefit to be realized to be less than the carrying value of the deferred tax asset.

· New Accounting Guidance: In January 2010, the FASB issued additional authoritative guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures. This includes the disclosure of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 measurements and describing the reasons for the transfers, reporting of information separately for purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements within Level 3 measurements, level of disaggregation, and input and valuation techniques. The additional authoritative guidance, except for the reporting of information within Level 3 measurements was effective January 1, 2010. The adoption of the additional guidance on January 1, 2010 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The additional authoritative guidance for the reporting of activity for purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements within Level 3 measurements is effective January 1, 2011. The Company believes the impact of the additional authoritative guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures for Level 3 measurements will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain items from our Consolidated Statements of Operations as a percentage of our net sales:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
	(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)

Net sales	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Cost of goods sold - materials	30.7		30.6		30.4		30.4
Personnel costs	33.9		34.8		35.4		35.4
Other operating expenses	20.6		20.1		20.1		20.6
Relocation expenses	3.9		—		2.4		—
Depreciation and amortization	2.2		2.1		2.2		2.2
Income from operations	8.7		12.4		9.5		11.4
Interest expense	3.7		4.0		3.8		4.1
Income before taxes	5.0		8.4		5.7		7.3
Provision for income taxes	1.7		3.3		2.2		2.9
Net income	3.3	%	5.1	%	3.5	%	4.4	%

Table of Contents

Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009

Net Sales. Net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2010 increased by $14.5 million, or 7.5%, to $206.7 million from $192.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The sales increase was principally the result of a $6.9 million, or 4.1% increase in same-center sales in our patient care business, a $2.4 million, or 10.5% increase in external sales of our distribution segment, and a $5.2 million increase principally related to sales from acquired entities.

Cost of Goods Sold - Materials. Cost of goods sold - materials for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $63.4 million, an increase of $4.5 million, or 7.6%, over $58.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The increase was the result of the growth in sales. Cost of goods sold - materials as a percentage of net sales increased to 30.7% in 2010 from 30.6% in 2009 due to a slight change in sales mix.

Personnel Costs. Personnel costs for the three months ended September 30, 2010 increased by $3.1 million to $70.1 million from $67.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The increase of $3.1 million from the prior year is due primarily to $2.2 million from acquired entities, $1.6 million related to merit increases and other compensation, offset by a decrease in employee benefit costs $0.7 million. Personnel costs as a percentage of sales decreased 90 basis points to 33.9% from 34.8% in the prior year due to continued leveraging of existing personnel over greater sales volume.

Other Operating Expenses. Other operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2010 increased by $3.8 million to $42.5 million from $38.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The increase is due primarily to $0.7 million of additional operating costs from acquired entities, $0.6 million of due diligence costs related to the acquisition of Accelerated Care Plus, higher occupancy costs of $1.0 million, increased variable compensation and bad debt expense of $0.4 million each, and an increase in other overhead costs of $0.7 million. As a percentage of net revenue, other operating expenses increased 50 basis points to 20.6% from 20.1% in 2009 due primarily to the recently acquired entities and due diligence costs related to ACP.

Relocation Expenses. The Company has substantially completed the relocation of its corporate office from Bethesda, Maryland to Austin, Texas. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company incurred $3.0 million of employee separation and other costs and $5.0 million in lease termination costs related to the closing of the Bethesda, Maryland office.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $4.5 million compared to $4.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The increase from the prior year was commensurate with the increase in fixed asset purchases over the last 12 months.

Income from Operations. Income from operations decreased $5.5 million to $18.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $23.8 million in the three months ended September 30, 2009. The decrease in the current period over the same period in the prior year is

Table of Contents

due to the Company recording nonrecurring charges for relocation, $8.0 million, and due diligence costs related to the acquisition of ACP, $0.6 million. Both of these nonrecurring charges were offset by increased revenues.

Interest Expense. Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was consistent with expenses in the same quarter in the previous year due to variable interest rates remaining approximately the same.

Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $3.8 million or 35.2% of pre tax income, compared to $6.4 million or 40.0% of pre tax income for the same period in the prior year. The decrease in the income tax provision is primarily due to lower taxable income along with a decrease in the effective tax rate. The Company’s effective tax rate has benefited from the release of income tax reserves.

Net Income. Net income decreased $2.7 million, or 28.2%, to $6.9 million for three months ended September 30, 2010 from $9.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The current period decreased over the same period in the prior year due mainly to corporate office relocation expenses and due diligence costs related to ACP, partially offset by increases in sales.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009

Net Sales. Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased by $35.9 million, or 6.5%, to $590.9 million from $555.0 million for the same period in the prior year. The sales increase was principally the result of a $19.3 million, or 4.0%, increase in same-center sales in our patient care business, a $5.6 million, or 8.5% increase, in external sales of our distribution segment, and an $11.0 million increase associated with acquisitions.

Cost of Goods Sold - Materials. Cost of goods sold - materials for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $179.8 million, an increase of $11.0 million, or 6.5%, over $168.8 million for the same period in the prior year. The increase was the result of growth in sales. Cost of goods sold - materials as a percentage of net sales were 30.4% in both 2010 and 2009.

Personnel Costs. Personnel costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased by $12.6 million to $209.4 million from $196.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increase was principally due to $4.9 million of additional personnel cost from acquired entities, $6.8 million related to merit increases and other compensation, and employee benefit costs of $0.9 million.

Other Operating Expenses. Other operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased by $4.4 million to $118.5 million from $114.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increase is due primarily to $1.7 million of additional operating costs from acquired entities, higher occupancy costs of $2.1 million, and $2.7 million of increases in other overhead costs, offset by a decrease in variable compensation expense of $1.7 million and decrease in bad debt expense of $0.4 million. Continued focus on cost management resulted in

Table of Contents

other operating costs as a percentage of net sales decreasing 50 basis points to 20.1% compared to 20.6% in the same period in the prior year.

Relocation Expenses. The Company has substantially completed the relocation of its corporate office from Bethesda, Maryland to Austin, Texas. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company incurred $9.2 million of employee separation and other costs and $5.0 million in lease termination costs related to the closing of the Bethesda, Maryland office.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $13.2 million versus $12.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increase is commensurate with the increase in fixed asset purchases over the last 12 months.

Income from Operations. Income from operations decreased $7.3 million to $55.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to $63.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009, primarily due to nonrecurring expenses of $14.8 million consisting of corporate relocation and due diligence costs related to ACP.

Interest Expense. Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was consistent with expenses in the same period in the previous year due to variable interest rates remaining approximately the same.

Provision for Income Taxes: The provision for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $12.3 million or 37.3% of pre tax income, compared to $16.1 million or 40.0% of pre tax income for the same period in the prior year. The decrease in the income tax provision is primarily due to lower taxable income along with a decrease in the effective tax rate. The Company’s effective tax rate has benefited from the release of income tax reserves.

Net Income. As a result of the above, the Company recorded net income of $20.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $24.2 million for the same period in the prior year.

Financial Condition, Liquidity, and Capital Resources

Cash Flows

Our working capital at September 30, 2010 was $239.1 million compared to $216.7 million at December 31, 2009. The increase in working capital is primarily due to an increase in inventory and other assets and the reduction in compensation accruals. Cash flow provided by operations was $38.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $46.1 million in the prior year. The reduced cash flow is primarily due to the build in inventory and other working capital. Days sales outstanding (“DSO”), which is the number of days between the billing for our O&P services and the date of our receipt of payment thereof is 47 days, which is consistent with the prior year.

Table of Contents

Net cash used in investing activities was $22.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 versus $14.9 million for the same period in the prior year. Cash used in investing activities in the current period included $19.7 million related to the purchase of computer related assets, machinery and equipment, and leasehold improvements and $9.4 million related to acquisitions of patient-care centers. These amounts were offset by the sale of our auction rate securities, with proceeds totaling $6.5 million.

Net cash used in financing activities was $5.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 versus $11.3 million for the same period in the prior year. The decrease in cash used in financing activities was due to the repayment of the outstanding balance on the Company’s revolving credit facility of $15.3 million, as well as the timing of the repayments and borrowings related to the auction rate securities and line of credit.

Debt

Long-term debt consisted of the following:

	September 30,			December 31,
(In thousands)	2010			2009
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)

Revolving Credit Facility	$	—		$	—
Line of Credit	—			3,628
Term Loan	220,225			221,956
10 1/4% Senior Notes due 2014	175,000			175,000
Subordinated seller notes, non-collateralized, net of unamortized discount with principal and interest payable in either monthly, quarterly or annual installments at effective interest rates ranging from 3.00% to 7.00%, maturing through October 2014	10,104			9,888
	405,329			410,472
Less current portion	(6,238		)	(8,835		)
	$	399,091		$	401,637

Revolving Credit Facility

Table of Contents

Facility, net of LCPI’s remaining $7.8 million commitment and $3.7 million of outstanding letters of credit.

Line of Credit

Term Loan

10 ¼% Senior Notes

The notes are not redeemable at the Company’s option prior to June 1, 2010. On or after June 1, 2010, the Company may redeem all or part of the notes upon not less than 30 days and no more than 60 days’ notice, for the twelve-month period beginning on June 1 of the following years; at (i) 105.125% through May 31, 2011; (ii) 102.563% through May 31, 2012; and (iii) 100.0% beginning June 1, 2013 and thereafter through June 1, 2014.

Refinance

Table of Contents

general corporate purposes. The 7 1/8% Senior Notes are senior indebtedness and are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by all of our current and future domestic subsidiaries. Interest is payable May 15th and November 15th of each year. In conjunction with this transaction, the Company will incur a loss on the extinguishment of the 10 ¼% Senior Notes of approximately $11.5 million.

During October, we entered into a non-binding commitment letter with a group of financial institutions to refinance and expand our credit facilities to provide the necessary funding to complete the acquisition of ACP. The new credit facilities will consist of up to a $100.0 million revolving credit facility and up to $325.0 million term loans. The Company expects to complete the refinancing during the fourth quarter of 2010, however no assurance can be made as to the Company’s ability to complete the transaction at acceptable terms. However, we believe that based on current levels of operations and anticipated growth, cash generated from operations will be sufficient for the foreseeable future to fund anticipated working capital, capital expenditures and to make required debt service payments. We will continue to evaluate potential acquisitions and expect to fund such acquisitions from our available sources of liquidity, as discussed above.

Debt Covenants

Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following table sets forth our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of September 30, 2010 (unaudited):

Payments Due by Period

(In thousands)	2010		2011		2012		2013		2014		Thereafter		Total

Long-term debt (1)	$	2,203	$	6,252	$	5,728	$	216,039	$	175,107	$	—	$	405,329
Interest payments on long-term debt	11,799		25,984		23,762		20,768		8,972		—		$	91,285
Operating leases	10,389		38,047		31,921		24,511		17,995		33,319		$	156,182
Capital leases and other long-term obligations (2)	2,377		8,077		6,739		4,312		3,451		8,477		$	33,433
Total contractual cash obligations	$	26,768	$	78,360	$	68,150	$	265,630	$	205,525	$	41,796	$	686,229

(1) This does not reflect the effects of the refinancing.

(2) Other long-term obligations consist primarily of amounts related to our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, contingent consideration payments and payments under the restructuring plans.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Innovative Neurotronics, Inc. (“IN, Inc.”), is party to a non-binding purchase agreement under which it purchases assembled WalkAide System kits. As of September 30, 2010, IN, Inc. had outstanding purchase commitments of approximately $1.2 million that we expect to be fulfilled over the next three months.

Table of Contents

Market Risk

The Company is exposed to the market risk that is associated with changes in interest rates. At September 30, 2010, all our outstanding debt, with the exception of $70.2 million of the Term Loan and the Line of Credit, is subject to fixed interest rates (see Item 3 below).

Forward Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements setting forth our beliefs or expectations relating to future revenues, contracts and operations, as well as the results of an internal investigation and certain legal proceedings. Actual results may differ materially from projected or expected results due to changes in the demand for our O&P products and services, uncertainties relating to the results of operations or recently acquired O&P patient-care centers, our ability to enter into and derive benefits from managed-care contracts, our ability to successfully attract and retain qualified O&P practitioners, federal laws governing the health-care industry, uncertainties inherent in incomplete investigations and legal proceedings, governmental policies affecting O&P operations and other risks and uncertainties generally affecting the health-care industry. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Refer to risk factors disclosed in Part II, Item 1A of this filing as well as the risk factors disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for discussion of risks and uncertainties. The Company disclaims any intent or obligation to publicly update these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We have existing obligations relating to our 10 ¼% Senior Notes, Term Loan, Subordinated Seller Notes, and Line of Credit. As of September 30, 2010, we have cash flow exposure to the changing interest rates on $70.2 million of the Term Loan and the entire Line of Credit. The other obligations have fixed interest or dividend rates.

In addition, in the normal course of business, we are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates. From time-to-time, we execute LIBOR contracts to fix interest rate exposure for specific periods of time. At September 30, 2010, we had one contract outstanding which fixed LIBOR at 2.26%, which expired on October 29, 2010.

In May 2008, the Company entered into two interest rate swap agreements under which $150.0 million of the Company’s variable rate Term Loans were converted to a fixed rate of 5.4%. The agreements expire in April 2011.

Table of Contents

Presented below is an analysis of our financial instruments as of September 30, 2010 that is sensitive to changes in interest rates. The table demonstrates the changes in estimated annual cash flow related to the outstanding balance under the Term Loan and the Interest Rate Swap, calculated for an instantaneous parallel shift in interest rates, plus or minus 50 basis points (“BPS”), 100 BPS, and 150 BPS.

Cash Flow Risk	Annual Interest Expense Given an Interest Rate Decrease of X Basis Points						No Change in		Annual Interest Expense Given an Interest Rate Increase of X Basis Points
(In thousands)	(150 BPS)		(100 BPS)		(50 BPS)		Interest Rates		50 BPS		100 BPS		150 BPS
Term Loan	$	1,674	$	2,775	$	3,876	$	4,977	$	6,078	$	7,178	$	8,279
Interest Rate Swap	6,975		6,225		5,475		4,725		3,975		3,225		2,475

	$	8,649	$	9,000	$	9,351	$	9,702	$	10,053	$	10,403	$	10,754

Table of Contents

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by it in its periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Based on an evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures conducted by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, such officers concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of September 30, 2010 to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports filed under the Exchange Act was accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Change in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

In accordance with Rule 13a-15(d) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, determined that there was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2010, that has materially effected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Part II. Other Information

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

Part I, Item 1A (“Risk Factors”) of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 sets forth information relating to important risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition or operating results. Those risk factors continue to be relevant to an understanding of the Company’s business, financial condition and operating results. Certain of those risk factors have been updated in this Form 10-Q to provide updated information, as set forth below. References to “we,” “our” and “us” in these risk factors refer to the Company.

Changes in government reimbursement levels could adversely affect our net sales, cash flows and profitability.

We derived 41.3% and 40.5% of our net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, from reimbursements for O&P services and products from programs administered by Medicare, Medicaid and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we derived 40.9% and 41.0%, respectively, of our net sales from reimbursements for O&P services and products from programs administered by Medicare, Medicaid and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Each of these programs set maximum reimbursement levels for O&P services and products. If these agencies reduce reimbursement levels for O&P services and products in the future, our net sales could substantially decline. In addition, the percentage of our net sales derived from these sources may

Table of Contents

increase as the portion of the U.S. population over age 65 continues to grow, making us more vulnerable to maximum reimbursement level reductions by these organizations. Reduced government reimbursement levels could result in reduced private payor reimbursement levels because fee schedules of certain third-party payors are indexed to Medicare. Furthermore, the healthcare industry is experiencing a trend towards cost containment as government and other thirdparty payors seek to impose lower reimbursement rates and negotiate reduced contract rates with service providers. This trend could adversely affect our net sales. For example, a number of states are in the process of reviewing Medicaid reimbursement policies generally, including for prosthetic and orthotic devices, and Arizona has recently enacted legislation limiting Medicaid orthotic eligibility for those over 21 years of age. This legislation does not become effective until October 1, 2010, and we are evaluating its impact on our business in Arizona. Additionally, Medicare provides for reimbursement for O&P products and services based on prices set forth in fee schedules for ten regional service areas. Medicare prices are adjusted each year based on the Consumer Price Index—Urban (‘‘CPIU’’) unless Congress acts to change or eliminate the adjustment. The Medicare price increases for 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were 0.0%, 5.0%, 2.7% and 4.3%, respectively. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. No. 111-148, March 23, 2010 (‘‘PPACA’’) changed the Medicare inflation factors applicable to O&P (and other) suppliers. The annual updates for 2011 will be based on the CPI-U percentage increase for the 12-month period ending with June 2010. The annual updates for years subsequent to 2011 are based on the percentage increase in the CPI-U for the 12-month period ending with June of the previous year. Section 3401(m) of PPACA required that for 2011 and each subsequent year, the fee schedule update factor based on the CPI-U for the 12-month period ending with June of the previous year is to be adjusted by the annual economy-wide private nonfarm business multifactory productivity (‘‘the MFP Adjustment’’). MFP Adjustment may result in that percentage increase being less than zero for a year, and may result in payment rates for a year being less than such payment rates for the preceding year. CMS has not yet issued a final rule implementing these adjustments for 2011, but has indicated in a proposed rule that it will do so as part of the annual program instructions to the O&P fee schedule updates. See 75 Fed. Reg. 40040, 40122, et seq. (July 13, 2010). If the U.S. Congress were to legislate additional modifications to the Medicare fee schedules, our net sales from Medicare and other payors could be adversely and materially affected. We cannot predict whether any such modifications to the fee schedules will be enacted or what the final form of any modifications might be.

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed herewith:

Exhibit No.		Document

31.1		Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32		Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

HANGER ORTHOPEDIC GROUP, INC.


Dated: November 5, 2010		/s/Thomas F. Kirk
		Thomas F. Kirk
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)


Dated: November 5, 2010		/s/George E. McHenry
		George E. McHenry
		Executive Vice President and
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)


Dated: November 5, 2010		/s/Thomas C. Hofmeister
		Thomas C. Hofmeister
		Vice President of Finance
		(Chief Accounting Officer)

Attached files

Stock widget

Investing forum

HANGER, INC. Reports