Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
8-K - FORM 8-K - PROLOGIS | d77080e8vk.htm |
Exhibit 99.1
EARNINGS RELEASE AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION - Unaudited
Third Quarter 2010
Third Quarter 2010
OVERVIEW: |
Section I | |||
Earnings Release |
1.1 | |||
Overview |
1.5 | |||
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: |
Section II | |||
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
2.1 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Operations |
2.2 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Funds From Operations (FFO) |
2.3 | |||
Reconciliations of Net Earnings (Loss) to FFO and EBITDA |
2.4 | |||
Calculation of Per Share Amounts |
2.5 | |||
DIRECT OWNED: |
Section III | |||
Operating Properties |
3.1 | |||
Under Development Portfolio and Land |
3.2 | |||
Development Activity |
3.3 | |||
Investing Activity |
3.4 | |||
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT: |
Section IV | |||
ProLogis Investments in Unconsolidated Investees |
4.1 | |||
Operating Portfolio of Property Funds |
4.2 | |||
Summarized Financial Information of Property Funds |
4.3 | |||
Investing and Financing Activity |
4.5 | |||
OPERATING STATISTICS: |
Section V | |||
Direct Owned Leasing and Capital Expenditures |
5.1 | |||
Investment Management Leasing and Capital Expenditures |
5.2 | |||
Same Store Analysis and Top Customers |
5.3 | |||
Major Logistics Corridors and Total Portfolio |
5.4 | |||
DEBT: |
Section VI | |||
ProLogis Debt Summary |
6.1 | |||
ProLogis Debt and Equity |
6.2 | |||
Property Fund Debt Summary |
6.3 | |||
ProLogis Debt Covenant Ratios |
6.4 | |||
NET ASSET VALUE: |
Section VII | |||
Components of Net Asset Value for ProLogis |
7.1 | |||
NOTES AND DEFINITIONS: |
||||
Notes to Supplemental Information |
Appendix A | |||
Definitions |
Appendix B |
Executive Office Address 4545 Airport Way Denver, CO 80239 +1 (303) 567-5000
Third Quarter 2010
|
PROLOGIS REPORTS THIRD QUARTER RESULTS
New Date and Time for Conference Call
Key Industrial Indicators Showing Improvement
Dispositions Ahead of Plan; Support Enhanced Portfolio Quality and
Concentration in Major Logistics Corridors
Company Provides Dividend and 2011 FFO Outlook
Denver, Colo. October 25, 2010 ProLogis (NYSE: PLD), the leading global provider of
distribution facilities, today reported third quarter 2010 funds from operations as defined by
ProLogis (FFO), excluding significant non-cash items, of $0.22 per diluted share. Of this amount,
approximately $0.07 related to gains from disposition activity and $0.15 per diluted share was from
core operations. FFO, including significant non-cash items of $0.01, was $0.21 per diluted share.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, FFO, excluding significant non-cash items and
year-to-date non-recurring charges, was $0.50 per diluted share, relative to the companys
full-year 2010 guidance of $0.70 to $0.78 per diluted share. Core FFO for the nine months was
$0.38 per diluted share relative to the companys full-year guidance of $0.53 to $0.56 per diluted
share.
The company reported a net loss of $0.03 per diluted share for the third quarter of 2010 and a net
loss of $0.27 per diluted share for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
During the quarter, we made significant progress on our objective of disposing of non-strategic,
direct owned properties in order to reduce debt and create value through accretive development,
said Walter C. Rakowich, chief executive officer. Our third-quarter dispositions and those we plan
to complete in the fourth quarter or in early 2011 support our efforts to shift investment into new
development, increase our direct owned portfolio outside the United States and enhance the quality
and concentration of our properties within major logistics corridors.
Industrial Fundamentals Showing Improvement
Industrial operating performance metrics are turning around, although the pace of improvement is
more moderate than we have experienced in past recoveries, Rakowich said. There is a continued
lack of new development in our global markets, and the availability of large, modern distribution
centers is shrinking. We believe we are nearing a tipping point where even a modest improvement in
demand could facilitate a rapid recovery in the industrial market. Among the favorable signs are:
positive net absorption in the top 31 North American industrial markets for the second consecutive
quarter, stable-to-improving occupancies and rental rate growth in select, supply constrained
markets. Overall, fundamentals are headed in the right direction.
The companys total industrial operating portfolio (including completed development and the
investment management portfolio) was 89.90 percent leased at the end of the quarter, up 24 basis
points from 89.66 percent at June 30, 2010. Leasing in the companys completed development
portfolio increased by 122 basis points, or 217 basis points excluding the contribution and sale of
fully leased properties during the quarter (see page 3.1). Total leasing activity in the third
quarter was 27.0 million square feet, in line with historical average quarterly leasing activity.
Customer retention during the quarter remained strong at 70.5 percent within the companys direct
owned portfolio and 79.1 percent within its investment management business. In the companys total
same-store portfolio, rental rates on turnovers declined 8.5 percent in the third quarter, compared
with a rental rate decline of 15.7 percent in the second quarter of 2010. Occupancy increased by
2.1 percent, and net operating income increased
0.27 percent.
Year-to-date and Planned Dispositions to Significantly Exceed Goal
Section I Overview
Page 1.1
Page 1.1
Third Quarter 2010
|
Through the end of the third quarter, the company had completed over $595 million of property
dispositions and contributions to funds. In addition, the company recently entered into a
definitive agreement with affiliates of Blackstone Real Estate Advisors (Blackstone) to sell a
North American industrial portfolio, its minority interest in a hotel property and ProLogis
interests in three of its property funds for a total purchase price of $1.02 billion. Total gross
proceeds from this transaction, year-to-date dispositions and anticipated fourth quarter sales are
expected to be approximately $1.65 to $1.7 billion above the companys initial 2010 gross
disposition target of $1.3 to $1.5 billion. Net proceeds from the Blackstone transaction are
expected to be approximately $830 million and will be used principally for the repayment of debt
and to fund development activity.
In addition, ProLogis is actively pursuing the disposition of certain retail, mixed-use and ground
lease assets. The company expects to consummate the disposition of all, or a portion of, these
assets in early 2011 and to generate $350 to $550 million in proceeds.
Steady Demand for New Development
In the first three quarters, the company began more than $500 million of new development. Since the
end of the quarter, ProLogis has signed three new build-to-suit agreements totaling $62 million of
total expected investment, including two in the United States and one in the UK. We continue to
have a robust pipeline of development proposals and expect actual starts this year of $600 to $700
million, with another $48 million of signed development agreements that will begin construction in
2011, said Ted R. Antenucci, president and chief investment officer. We plan to expand our
development business to $800 million to $1 billion of annual starts in 2011. While we anticipate
the vast majority will be build-to-suit, we believe improving fundamentals in major logistics
corridors will support speculative development in a handful of space-constrained markets. Expanding
our development program is an important element of our long-term growth plan and is accretive to
net asset value.
Strategic Positioning in Focus for Fourth Quarter
We are highly focused on implementing a number of strategic initiatives in the fourth quarter,
which we believe will position us well for 2011 and beyond, said William E. Sullivan, chief
financial officer. The spectrum of initiatives includes, but is not limited to:
| A strategic decision to more aggressively pursue land sales, wherein we are undertaking a rigorous evaluation of all land positions and may take further impairments of our current book basis, which we expect to be in line with discount ranges presented in our recent investor presentations, which could be material; | ||
| A plan to tender for between $1 billion and $2 billion of our public debt, with the principal intent of further smoothing our annual maturities, as well as deploying the proceeds from our asset sales activity into the most accretive debt reduction opportunities; | ||
| An intent to evaluate the effectiveness of various derivative positions, in light of the current and anticipated interest rate environment, which may result in the recording of one-time charges or adjustments; | ||
| A focus on creating incremental cost savings from structural and platform efficiencies, and | ||
| A review of the companys investment in certain non-industrial assets, which may result in impairments. |
Our 2010 per diluted share guidance for core FFO of $0.53 to $0.56; FFO, excluding significant
non-cash items and non-recurring charges, of $0.70 to $0.78; and net earnings of $0.09 to $0.13,
remains unchanged. However, we anticipate a variety of one-time charges, some cash and some
non-cash, from the fourth quarter strategic positioning activities, which are not included in our
guidance.
While the Blackstone transaction will generate sizeable taxable gains, the company expects these
gains to be partially offset by losses associated with the intended debt repurchase and other
anticipated fourth quarter charges. As a result, the company intends to reduce its fourth quarter
dividend to $0.1125 per share, consistent with anticipated taxable income for 2010. It is our
Boards current intent to maintain this level of cash dividend throughout 2011, more in line with
our taxable income, and position ourselves to grow the dividend over time as our adjusted FFO
grows, said Sullivan.
Section I Overview
Page 1.2
Page 1.2
Third Quarter 2010
|
Expectations for 2011
The company also established an expectation for growth in core FFO per share of 15 percent or more
for 2011 and will provide a specific range and business drivers to support that guidance early in
the year. Our growth rate in 2011 will be affected by the
dilutive impact of the Blackstone transaction and additional anticipated 2010 and 2011 asset sales,
the proceeds of which will initially be used to reduce debt. However, we expect growth from the
impact of continued development portfolio leasing, new build-to-suit developments coming on line
and higher average occupancies, said Sullivan. In addition, while we expect FFO gains from
development in 2011, we will focus our guidance in 2011 primarily on core FFO.
The companys expected net earnings per share of $0.09 to $0.13 for 2010 would have been a net loss
of $0.50 to $0.55 per share prior to anticipated disposition gains. For 2011, the loss per share
is expected to decline by roughly 25 percent, prior to any dispositions, acquisitions or other
transactions. The primary difference between FFO and earnings per share relates to depreciation and
gains or losses on transactions.
Webcast and Conference Call Information
The company will host a webcast/conference call to discuss quarterly results, current market
conditions and future outlook on Tuesday, October 26, 2010, at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time. Interested
parties are encouraged to access the live webcast by clicking the microphone icon located near the
top of the opening page at http://ir.prologis.com. Interested parties also can participate via
conference call by dialing (866) 305-2304 domestically or (660) 422-4873 internationally.
Replay Information
A replay of the conference call will be posted when available. The replay will be available until
midnight Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 9, 2010, and can be accessed by dialing (800) 642-1687
domestically or (706) 645-9291 internationally and entering passcode 20289828. A transcript of the
call and the webcast replay, including a podcast format, will be posted when available in the
Financial Information section of the ProLogis Investor Relations website.
About ProLogis
ProLogis is the leading global provider of distribution facilities, with more than 475
million square feet of industrial space owned and managed (44 million square meters) in markets
across North America, Europe and Asia. The company leases its industrial facilities to more than
4,400 customers, including manufacturers, retailers, transportation companies, third-party
logistics providers and other enterprises with large-scale distribution needs. For additional
information about the company, go to www.prologis.com.
Follow
ProLogis on Twitter: http://twitter.com/ProLogis
The statements above that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements are based on current
expectations, estimates and projections about the industry and markets in which ProLogis operates,
managements beliefs and assumptions made by management, they involve uncertainties that could
significantly impact ProLogis financial results. Words such as expects, anticipates,
intends, plans, believes, seeks, estimates, variations of such words and similar
expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, which generally are not
historical in nature. All statements that address operating performance, events or developments
that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future including statements relating to rent and
occupancy growth, development activity and changes in sales or contribution volume of developed
properties, general conditions in the geographic areas where we operate and the availability of
capital in existing or new property funds are forward-looking statements. These statements are
not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that
are difficult to predict. Although we believe the expectations reflected in any forward-looking
statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will
be attained and therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed
or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. Some of the factors that may affect outcomes and
results include, but are not limited to: (i) national, international, regional and local
Section I Overview
Page 1.3
Page 1.3
Third Quarter 2010
|
economic
climates, (ii) changes in financial markets, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates,
(iii) increased or unanticipated competition for our properties, (iv) risks associated with
acquisitions, (v) maintenance of real estate investment trust (REIT) status, (vi) availability of
financing and capital, (vii) changes in demand for developed properties, and (viii) those
additional factors discussed in reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by
ProLogis under the heading Risk Factors. ProLogis undertakes no duty to update any
forward-looking statements appearing in this press release.
Investor Relations
|
Media | Financial Media | ||
Melissa Marsden
|
Krista Shepard | Suzanne Dawson | ||
303-567-5622
|
303-567-5907 | Linden Alschuler & Kaplan, Inc | ||
mmarsden@prologis.com
|
kshepard@prologis.com | 212-329-1420 | ||
sdawson@lakpr.com |
Section I Overview
Page 1.4
Page 1.4
Third Quarter 2010 |
Overview
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Summary of Results
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Revenues
(page 2.2) |
$ | 270,114 | $ | 269,291 | $ | 790,541 | $ | 960,283 | ||||||||
Net
earnings (loss) (page 2.2)
(a) |
$ | (15,052 | ) | $ | (11,788 | ) | $ | (129,331 | ) | $ | 405,809 | |||||
Net
earnings (loss) per share - Diluted
(page 2.5) (a) |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | 1.06 | |||||
FFO,
including significant non-cash items
(page 2.3) (a) |
$ | 104,050 | $ | 65,187 | $ | 179,011 | $ | 444,646 | ||||||||
Add (deduct) significant non-cash items (page 2.4): |
||||||||||||||||
Impairment of real estate properties and other assets |
2,929 | 46,274 | 3,296 | 130,492 | ||||||||||||
Net gain related to disposed assets - China operations |
- | - | - | (3,315 | ) | |||||||||||
Losses (gains) on early extinguishment of debt |
1,791 | (12,010 | ) | 16,049 | (173,218 | ) | ||||||||||
Write-off deferred extension fees associated with the Global Line |
- | - | 854 | - | ||||||||||||
Our share of certain losses (gains) recognized by the property funds |
- | (4,925 | ) | 3,575 | 6,358 | |||||||||||
Total adjustments for significant non-cash items |
4,720 | 29,339 | 23,774 | (39,683 | ) | |||||||||||
FFO,
excluding significant non-cash items
(page 2.4) (a) |
$ | 108,770 | $ | 94,526 | $ | 202,785 | $ | 404,963 | ||||||||
FFO per
share - Diluted, including significant non-cash items
(page 2.5) (a) |
$ | 0.21 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 1.16 | ||||||||
Add (deduct) - summarized significant non-cash adjustments - per share (page 2.4) |
0.01 | 0.07 | 0.05 | (0.10 | ) | |||||||||||
FFO per
share - Diluted, excluding significant non-cash items
(page 2.5) (a) |
$ | 0.22 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 1.06 | ||||||||
Assets Owned and Under Management |
September 30, | June 30, | March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2010 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Direct owned - investment balance: |
||||||||||||||||
Industrial properties: |
||||||||||||||||
Core (page 3.1) |
$ | 7,580,614 | $ | 7,486,076 | $ | 7,431,138 | $ | 7,436,539 | ||||||||
Core - completed development (page 3.1) |
4,048,846 | 4,061,575 | 4,069,516 | 4,108,962 | ||||||||||||
Properties under development (page 3.2) |
276,397 | 199,434 | 194,226 | 191,127 | ||||||||||||
Land held for development (page 3.2) |
2,380,914 | 2,282,223 | 2,387,984 | 2,569,343 | ||||||||||||
Retail and mixed use properties |
304,358 | 303,428 | 303,191 | 302,838 | ||||||||||||
Land subject to ground leases and other |
372,823 | 371,181 | 372,902 | 373,422 | ||||||||||||
Other investments |
162,285 | 209,932 | 195,677 | 190,352 | ||||||||||||
Total - direct owned |
15,126,237 | 14,913,849 | 14,954,634 | 15,172,583 | ||||||||||||
Investment management - investment balance (b): |
||||||||||||||||
Industrial properties: |
||||||||||||||||
Property funds (page 4.2) |
18,811,641 | 17,958,090 | 18,660,979 | 19,468,889 | ||||||||||||
Other unconsolidated investees |
951,208 | 623,858 | 618,671 | 444,985 | ||||||||||||
Total - investment management |
19,762,849 | 18,581,948 | 19,279,650 | 19,913,874 | ||||||||||||
Total assets owned and under management |
$ | 34,889,086 | $ | 33,495,797 | $ | 34,234,284 | $ | 35,086,457 | ||||||||
(a) | These amounts are attributable to common shares. | |
(b) | Amounts represent the entitys investment balance in the property, not our proportionate share. |
See numbered note references in Appendix A and Appendix B for definitions that are used throughout
this report.
Section I - Overview
Page 1.5
Page 1.5
Third Quarter 2010 |
Overview
- continued
(in thousands, except percentages)
Summary of Portfolio
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet owned and under management: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct Owned: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial properties: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Core (page 3.1) |
142,803 | 141,019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Core - completed development (page 3.1) |
49,339 | 50,604 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Properties under development (page 3.2) |
4,347 | 2,930 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail and mixed use properties |
1,150 | 1,150 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment management - industrial properties: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property funds (page 4.2) |
269,108 | 274,241 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other unconsolidated investees |
12,975 | 10,021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total square feet owned and under management |
479,722 | 479,965 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
As of September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Core | Core-Completed Development | Under Development | Retail & Mixed Use | Investment Mgmt. | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Square feet by continent: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
140,865 | 20,992 | 937 | 1,150 | 174,265 | 338,209 | ||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
1,727 | 20,896 | 1,681 | - | 104,145 | 128,449 | ||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
211 | 7,451 | 1,729 | - | 3,673 | 13,064 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total square feet owned and under management |
142,803 | 49,339 | 4,347 | 1,150 | 282,083 | 479,722 | ||||||||||||||||||
Leasing Information |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Leased % |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct owned operating portfolio: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Core |
90.43 | % | 89.51 | % | 89.73 | % | 90.06 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Core - completed development |
73.14 | % | 71.92 | % | 67.12 | % | 62.18 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Direct owned operating portfolio (page 3.1) |
85.99 | % | 84.84 | % | 83.74 | % | 82.70 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Investment management- industrial properties: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property funds (page 4.2) |
92.72 | % | 93.08 | % | 93.04 | % | 93.54 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other unconsolidated investees |
89.53 | % | 90.62 | % | 91.58 | % | 94.47 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Investment management portfolio |
92.57 | % | 92.98 | % | 92.98 | % | 93.57 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Portfolio - Industrial |
89.90 | % | 89.66 | % | 89.21 | % | 89.19 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Under Development Portfolio (page 3.2) |
65.64 | % | 65.49 | % | 60.72 | % | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Leasing activity: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct owned - leases signed - quarterly activity (page 5.1) |
11,357 | 14,222 | 12,661 | 15,361 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Property funds - leases signed - quarterly activity (page 5.2) |
15,665 | 14,062 | 16,957 | 15,888 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total leasing activity |
27,022 | 28,284 | 29,618 | 31,249 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Section I - Overview
Page
1.6
Third Quarter 2010 |
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except per share data)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Assets: |
||||||||
Investments in real estate assets: |
||||||||
Industrial properties: |
||||||||
Core (1) |
$ | 7,580,614 | $ | 7,436,539 | ||||
Core - completed development |
4,048,846 | 4,108,962 | ||||||
Properties under development |
276,397 | 191,127 | ||||||
Land held for development |
2,380,914 | 2,569,343 | ||||||
Retail and mixed use properties |
304,358 | 302,838 | ||||||
Land subject to ground leases and other |
372,823 | 373,422 | ||||||
Other investments |
162,285 | 190,352 | ||||||
15,126,237 | 15,172,583 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
1,883,405 | 1,671,100 | ||||||
Net investments in real estate assets |
13,242,832 | 13,501,483 | ||||||
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated investees: |
||||||||
Property funds (1) |
2,024,149 | 1,876,650 | ||||||
Other unconsolidated investees (1) |
328,039 | 275,073 | ||||||
Total investments in and advances to unconsolidated investees |
2,352,188 | 2,151,723 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
17,799 | 34,362 | ||||||
Accounts and notes receivable |
123,186 | 91,547 | ||||||
Other assets |
1,033,914 | 1,017,780 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 16,769,919 | $ | 16,796,895 | ||||
Liabilities and Equity: |
||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||
Debt (2) |
$ | 8,170,032 | $ | 7,977,778 | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
397,281 | 367,399 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
519,524 | 444,432 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
9,086,837 | 8,789,609 | ||||||
Equity: |
||||||||
ProLogis shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Series C preferred shares at stated liquidation preference of $50 per share |
100,000 | 100,000 | ||||||
Series F preferred shares at stated liquidation preference of $25 per share |
125,000 | 125,000 | ||||||
Series G preferred shares at stated liquidation preference of $25 per share |
125,000 | 125,000 | ||||||
Common shares at $.01 par value per share |
4,770 | 4,742 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
8,573,066 | 8,524,867 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
17,392 | 42,298 | ||||||
Distributions in excess of net earnings |
(1,279,837 | ) | (934,583 | ) | ||||
Total ProLogis shareholders equity |
7,665,391 | 7,987,324 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
17,691 | 19,962 | ||||||
Total equity |
7,683,082 | 8,007,286 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 16,769,919 | $ | 16,796,895 | ||||
See Appendix A for note references
Section II - Financial Statements
Page 2.1
Page 2.1
Third Quarter 2010 |
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Rental income (3) |
$ | 236,068 | $ | 220,489 | $ | 695,816 | $ | 661,252 | ||||||||
Property management and other fees and incentives |
29,262 | 45,792 | 86,231 | 111,200 | ||||||||||||
CDFS disposition proceeds (4) |
- | - | - | 180,237 | ||||||||||||
Development management and other income |
4,784 | 3,010 | 8,494 | 7,594 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
270,114 | 269,291 | 790,541 | 960,283 | ||||||||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Rental expenses |
69,095 | 67,862 | 201,732 | 203,325 | ||||||||||||
Investment management expenses |
9,829 | 10,186 | 30,079 | 31,581 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative (5) |
34,959 | 38,632 | 115,886 | 128,325 | ||||||||||||
Reduction in workforce (5) |
- | 415 | - | 11,745 | ||||||||||||
Impairment of real estate properties and other assets |
2,929 | 46,274 | 3,296 | 130,492 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
93,469 | 79,643 | 267,018 | 230,952 | ||||||||||||
Other expenses |
5,409 | 8,405 | 14,325 | 19,408 | ||||||||||||
Total expenses |
215,690 | 251,417 | 632,336 | 755,828 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
54,424 | 17,874 | 158,205 | 204,455 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Earnings from unconsolidated property funds, net |
7,455 | 11,639 | 13,305 | 31,135 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from other unconsolidated investees, net |
1,770 | (693 | ) | 7,197 | 2,850 | |||||||||||
Interest expense (6) |
(120,233 | ) | (89,838 | ) | (349,132 | ) | (265,819 | ) | ||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
7,375 | (10,021 | ) | 5,833 | (5,846 | ) | ||||||||||
Net gains on dispositions of real estate properties (7) |
35,922 | 13,627 | 58,688 | 22,419 | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange gains, net (8) |
6,144 | 13,386 | 2,626 | 34,898 | ||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt, net (2) |
(1,791 | ) | 12,010 | (48,449 | ) | 173,218 | ||||||||||
Total other income (expense) |
(63,358 | ) | (49,890 | ) | (309,932 | ) | (7,145 | ) | ||||||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
(8,934 | ) | (32,016 | ) | (151,727 | ) | 197,310 | |||||||||
Current income tax expense (benefit) (4) |
5,499 | (4,626 | ) | 15,850 | 30,140 | |||||||||||
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
1,956 | (5,088 | ) | (40,442 | ) | (20,687 | ) | |||||||||
Total income taxes |
7,455 | (9,714 | ) | (24,592 | ) | 9,453 | ||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
(16,389 | ) | (22,302 | ) | (127,135 | ) | 187,857 | |||||||||
Discontinued operations (9): |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) attributable to disposed properties |
(130 | ) | 2,775 | 392 | 23,416 | |||||||||||
Net gain related to disposed assets - China operations (4) |
- | - | - | 3,315 | ||||||||||||
Net gains on dispositions: |
||||||||||||||||
Non-development properties |
667 | 14,270 | 9,729 | 199,791 | ||||||||||||
Development properties and land subject to ground leases |
7,359 | - | 7,424 | 11,503 | ||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
7,896 | 17,045 | 17,545 | 238,025 | ||||||||||||
Consolidated net earnings (loss) |
(8,493 | ) | (5,257 | ) | (109,590 | ) | 425,882 | |||||||||
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(190 | ) | (162 | ) | (634 | ) | (966 | ) | ||||||||
Net earnings (loss) attributable to controlling interests |
(8,683 | ) | (5,419 | ) | (110,224 | ) | 424,916 | |||||||||
Less preferred share dividends |
6,369 | 6,369 | 19,107 | 19,107 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) attributable to common shares |
$ | (15,052 | ) | $ | (11,788 | ) | $ | (129,331 | ) | $ | 405,809 | |||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding - Basic |
477,028 | 452,683 | 476,280 | 379,421 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding - Diluted |
477,028 | 452,683 | 476,280 | 382,623 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common shares - Basic: |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.31 | ) | $ | 0.44 | |||||
Discontinued operations |
0.02 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.63 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common shares - Basic |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | 1.07 | |||||
Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common shares - Diluted (page 2.5): |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.31 | ) | $ | 0.44 | |||||
Discontinued operations |
0.02 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.62 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common shares - Diluted |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | 1.06 | |||||
See Appendix A for note references
Section II - Financial Statements
Page 2.2
Page 2.2
Third Quarter 2010 |
Consolidated Statements of Funds From Operations (FFO)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 236,252 | $ | 225,226 | $ | 697,419 | $ | 711,681 | ||||||||
Property management and other fees and incentives |
29,262 | 45,792 | 86,231 | 111,293 | ||||||||||||
CDFS disposition proceeds (4) |
- | - | - | 180,237 | ||||||||||||
Development management and other income |
4,784 | 3,010 | 8,494 | 7,594 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
270,298 | 274,028 | 792,144 | 1,010,805 | ||||||||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Rental expense |
69,326 | 68,874 | 202,607 | 218,228 | ||||||||||||
Investment management expenses |
9,829 | 10,186 | 30,079 | 31,581 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative (5) |
34,959 | 38,632 | 115,886 | 129,630 | ||||||||||||
Reduction in workforce (5) |
- | 415 | - | 11,745 | ||||||||||||
Impairment of real estate properties and other assets |
2,929 | 46,274 | 3,296 | 130,492 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation of corporate assets |
3,269 | 3,982 | 9,770 | 12,069 | ||||||||||||
Other expenses |
5,409 | 8,405 | 14,325 | 19,414 | ||||||||||||
Total expenses |
125,721 | 176,768 | 375,963 | 553,159 | ||||||||||||
Operating FFO |
144,577 | 97,260 | 416,181 | 457,646 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
FFO from unconsolidated property funds |
42,315 | 43,901 | 116,016 | 115,518 | ||||||||||||
FFO from other unconsolidated investees |
3,660 | 947 | 12,135 | 8,926 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(120,233 | ) | (89,838 | ) | (349,132 | ) | (265,649 | ) | ||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
7,375 | (10,021 | ) | 5,833 | (5,774 | ) | ||||||||||
Net gains on dispositions of real estate properties, net of related tax (7)(10) |
38,899 | 12,515 | 59,150 | 30,072 | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange gains (losses), net |
(694 | ) | 318 | 17 | (22,068 | ) | ||||||||||
Gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt, net (2) |
(1,791 | ) | 12,010 | (48,449 | ) | 173,218 | ||||||||||
Current income tax benefit (expense) (4)(10) |
(3,499 | ) | 4,626 | (12,999 | ) | (30,341 | ) | |||||||||
Net gain related to disposed assets - China operations (4) |
- | - | - | 3,315 | ||||||||||||
Total other income (expense) |
(33,968 | ) | (25,542 | ) | (217,429 | ) | 7,217 | |||||||||
FFO |
110,609 | 71,718 | 198,752 | 464,863 | ||||||||||||
Less preferred share dividends |
6,369 | 6,369 | 19,107 | 19,107 | ||||||||||||
Less net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests |
190 | 162 | 634 | 1,110 | ||||||||||||
FFO attributable to common shares, including significant non-cash items |
$ | 104,050 | $ | 65,187 | $ | 179,011 | $ | 444,646 | ||||||||
Adjustments for significant non-cash items (page 2.4) |
4,720 | 29,339 | 23,774 | (39,683 | ) | |||||||||||
FFO attributable to common shares, excluding significant non-cash items |
$ | 108,770 | $ | 94,526 | $ | 202,785 | $ | 404,963 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding - Basic |
477,028 | 452,683 | 476,280 | 379,421 | ||||||||||||
FFO per share attributable to common shares, including significant non-cash items: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.22 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 1.17 | ||||||||
Diluted (page 2.5) |
$ | 0.21 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 1.16 | ||||||||
FFO per share attributable to common shares, excluding significant non-cash items: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.23 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 1.07 | ||||||||
Diluted (page 2.5) |
$ | 0.22 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 1.06 | ||||||||
See Appendix A for note references
Section II - Financial Statements
Page 2.3
Page 2.3
Third Quarter 2010 |
Reconciliations of Net Earnings (Loss) to FFO and EBITDA
(in thousands)
Reconciliation of net earnings (loss) to FFO, including significant non-cash items
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) (a) |
$ | (15,052 | ) | $ | (11,788 | ) | $ | (129,331 | ) | $ | 405,809 | |||||
Add (deduct) NAREIT defined adjustments: |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate related depreciation and amortization |
90,200 | 75,661 | 257,248 | 218,883 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments to gains on dispositions for depreciation |
(2,376 | ) | (1,001 | ) | (4,208 | ) | (2,204 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustments to (gains on) dispositions of non-development properties |
(6 | ) | (111 | ) | 97 | (1,646 | ) | |||||||||
Reconciling items attributable to discontinued operations: (9) |
||||||||||||||||
Gains on dispositions of non-development properties |
(667 | ) | (14,270 | ) | (9,729 | ) | (199,791 | ) | ||||||||
Real estate related depreciation and amortization |
83 | 950 | 336 | 11,534 | ||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
(584 | ) | (13,320 | ) | (9,393 | ) | (188,257 | ) | ||||||||
Our share of reconciling items from unconsolidated investees: |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate related depreciation and amortization |
39,311 | 37,973 | 116,143 | 113,954 | ||||||||||||
Adjustment to gains/losses on dispositions for depreciation |
- | (1,310 | ) | - | (7,888 | ) | ||||||||||
Other amortization items |
(3,324 | ) | (1,659 | ) | (10,313 | ) | (7,821 | ) | ||||||||
Total unconsolidated investees |
35,987 | 35,004 | 105,830 | 98,245 | ||||||||||||
Total NAREIT defined adjustments |
123,221 | 96,233 | 349,574 | 125,021 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal-NAREIT defined FFO |
108,169 | 84,445 | 220,243 | 530,830 | ||||||||||||
Add (deduct) our defined adjustments: |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange gains, net (8) |
(6,838 | ) | (13,068 | ) | (2,609 | ) | (56,897 | ) | ||||||||
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
1,956 | (5,088 | ) | (40,442 | ) | (20,699 | ) | |||||||||
Our share of reconciling items from unconsolidated investees: |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange losses (gains), net (8) |
350 | (556 | ) | 2,294 | (790 | ) | ||||||||||
Unrealized losses (gains) on derivative contracts, net |
1,450 | (208 | ) | (125 | ) | (6,167 | ) | |||||||||
Deferred income tax benefit |
(1,037 | ) | (338 | ) | (350 | ) | (1,631 | ) | ||||||||
Total unconsolidated investees |
763 | (1,102 | ) | 1,819 | (8,588 | ) | ||||||||||
Total our defined adjustments |
(4,119 | ) | (19,258 | ) | (41,232 | ) | (86,184 | ) | ||||||||
FFO, including significant non-cash items (a) |
$ | 104,050 | $ | 65,187 | $ | 179,011 | $ | 444,646 | ||||||||
Reconciliation of FFO, including significant non-cash items to FFO, excluding significant non-cash items
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
FFO, including significant non-cash items (a) |
$ | 104,050 | $ | 65,187 | $ | 179,011 | $ | 444,646 | ||||||||
Add (deduct) significant non-cash items: |
||||||||||||||||
Impairment of real estate properties and other assets |
2,929 | 46,274 | 3,296 | 130,492 | ||||||||||||
Net gain related to disposed assets - China operations (4) |
- | - | - | (3,315 | ) | |||||||||||
Losses (gains) on early extinguishment of debt (2) |
1,791 | (12,010 | ) | 16,049 | (173,218 | ) | ||||||||||
Write-off deferred extension fees associated with Global Line |
- | - | 854 | - | ||||||||||||
Our share of certain net losses (gains) recognized by the property funds (page 4.3) |
- | (4,925 | ) | 3,575 | 6,358 | |||||||||||
Total adjustments for significant non-cash items |
4,720 | 29,339 | 23,774 | (39,683 | ) | |||||||||||
FFO, excluding significant non-cash items (a) |
$ | 108,770 | $ | 94,526 | $ | 202,785 | $ | 404,963 | ||||||||
Reconciliation of FFO, excluding significant non-cash items, to EBITDA
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
FFO, excluding significant non-cash items (a) |
$ | 108,770 | $ | 94,526 | $ | 202,785 | $ | 404,963 | ||||||||
Interest expense |
120,233 | 89,838 | 348,278 | 265,649 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation of corporate assets |
3,269 | 3,982 | 9,770 | 12,069 | ||||||||||||
Current income tax expense (benefit) included in FFO (10) |
5,499 | (4,626 | ) | 15,850 | 30,341 | |||||||||||
Adjustments to gains on dispositions for interest capitalized |
1,849 | 4,605 | 3,119 | 11,544 | ||||||||||||
Preferred share dividends |
6,369 | 6,369 | 19,107 | 19,107 | ||||||||||||
Our share of reconciling items from unconsolidated investees |
45,705 | 44,241 | 141,247 | 130,705 | ||||||||||||
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) |
$ | 291,694 | $ | 238,935 | $ | 740,156 | $ | 874,378 | ||||||||
(a) | Attributable to common shares. |
See Consolidated Statements of Operations on page 2.2 and Consolidated Statements of FFO on page 2.3
See Appendix A for note references
Section II - Financial Statements
Page 2.4
Page 2.4
Third Quarter 2010 |
Calculation of Per Share Amounts
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 (a) | 2009 (a) | 2010 (a) | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) - Basic (b) |
$ | (15,052 | ) | $ | (11,788 | ) | $ | (129,331 | ) | $ | 405,809 | |||||
Noncontrolling interest attributable to convertible limited partnership units (c) |
- | - | - | 966 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted net earnings (loss) - Diluted (b) |
$ | (15,052 | ) | $ | (11,788 | ) | $ | (129,331 | ) | $ | 406,775 | |||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding - Basic |
477,028 | 452,683 | 476,280 | 379,421 | ||||||||||||
Incremental weighted average effect of conversion of limited partnership units (c) |
- | - | - | 1,192 | ||||||||||||
Incremental weighted average effect of stock awards |
- | - | - | 2,010 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding - Diluted (d) |
477,028 | 452,683 | 476,280 | 382,623 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) per share - Diluted (b) |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | 1.06 | |||||
FFO Per Share, including significant non-cash items
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
FFO - Basic, including significant non-cash items (b) |
$ | 104,050 | $ | 65,187 | $ | 179,011 | $ | 444,646 | ||||||||
Interest expense for convertible debt to common shares (d) |
4,216 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest attributable to convertible limited partnership units (c) |
157 | - | - | 966 | ||||||||||||
FFO - Diluted, including significant non-cash items (b) |
$ | 108,423 | $ | 65,187 | $ | 179,011 | $ | 445,612 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding - Basic |
477,028 | 452,683 | 476,280 | 379,421 | ||||||||||||
Incremental weighted average effect of conversion of limited partnership units (c) |
760 | - | - | 1,192 | ||||||||||||
Incremental weighted average effect of conversion of certain convertible debt (d) |
26,611 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Incremental weighted average effect of stock awards |
3,275 | 2,388 | 3,355 | 2,010 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding - Diluted |
507,674 | 455,071 | 479,635 | 382,623 | ||||||||||||
FFO per share - Diluted, including significant non-cash items (b) |
$ | 0.21 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 1.16 | ||||||||
FFO Per Share, excluding significant non-cash items
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
FFO - Basic, including significant non-cash items (b) |
$ | 104,050 | $ | 65,187 | $ | 179,011 | $ | 444,646 | ||||||||
Adjustments for significant non-cash items (see page 2.4) |
4,720 | 29,339 | 23,774 | (39,683 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest expense for convertible debt to common shares (d) |
4,216 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest attributable to convertible limited partnership units (c) |
157 | 162 | - | 966 | ||||||||||||
FFO - Diluted, excluding significant non-cash items (b) |
$ | 113,143 | $ | 94,688 | $ | 202,785 | $ | 405,929 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding - Basic |
477,028 | 452,683 | 476,280 | 379,421 | ||||||||||||
Incremental weighted average effect of conversion of limited partnership units (c) |
760 | 1,110 | - | 1,192 | ||||||||||||
Incremental weighted average effect of conversion of certain convertible debt (d) |
26,611 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Incremental weighted average effect of stock awards |
3,275 | 2,388 | 3,355 | 2,010 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding - Diluted |
507,674 | 456,181 | 479,635 | 382,623 | ||||||||||||
FFO per share - Diluted, excluding significant non-cash items (b) |
$ | 0.22 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 1.06 | ||||||||
(a) | In periods with a net loss, the inclusion of any incremental shares is anti-dilutive, and therefore, both basic and diluted shares are the same. | |
(b) | Attributable to common shares. | |
(c) | If the impact of the conversion of limited partnership units is anti-dilutive, the income and shares of the limited partnerships are not included in the diluted per share calculation. | |
(d) | Relates to the convertible debt issued in March 2010. If the impact of the conversion of the convertible debt is anti-dilutive, the expense associated with the debt and the related shares are not included in the diluted per share calculation. |
Section II - Financial Statements
Page 2.5
Page 2.5
Third Quarter 2010 |
Direct Owned - Operating Properties
(in thousands, except for number of buildings and leased/occupied percentage)
Direct Owned Industrial Operating Properties Portfolio (including Core and Completed Development)
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# of | Square | Investment | Leased | Occupied | # of | Square | Investment | Leased | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bldgs | Feet | Balance | Percent | Percent | Bldgs | Feet | Balance | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
2 | 526 | $ | 46,220 | 100.00 | % | 67.49 | % | 2 | 526 | $ | 43,536 | 20.95 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Mexico |
30 | 5,560 | 286,913 | 74.07 | % | 72.91 | % | 30 | 5,560 | 275,528 | 60.21 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
1,049 | 155,771 | 8,226,560 | 89.99 | % | 89.45 | % | 1,054 | 154,352 | 8,096,674 | 89.78 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total North America |
1,081 | 161,857 | 8,559,693 | 89.48 | % | 88.81 | % | 1,086 | 160,438 | 8,415,738 | 88.53 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Central Europe |
40 | 10,241 | 646,994 | 59.27 | % | 50.84 | % | 41 | 10,793 | 706,403 | 50.16 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern Europe |
13 | 2,998 | 212,064 | 82.32 | % | 77.62 | % | 15 | 3,321 | 244,557 | 58.61 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern Europe |
20 | 6,161 | 414,446 | 58.39 | % | 58.39 | % | 19 | 5,275 | 373,585 | 39.62 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom |
14 | 3,223 | 340,456 | 77.75 | % | 77.75 | % | 13 | 3,162 | 325,770 | 23.32 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Europe |
87 | 22,623 | 1,613,960 | 64.72 | % | 60.28 | % | 88 | 22,551 | 1,650,315 | 45.18 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
9 | 7,237 | 1,413,886 | 74.75 | % | 67.97 | % | 10 | 8,209 | 1,434,651 | 71.02 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Korea |
4 | 425 | 41,921 | 80.33 | % | 67.16 | % | 4 | 425 | 44,797 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Asia |
13 | 7,662 | 1,455,807 | 75.06 | % | 67.93 | % | 14 | 8,634 | 1,479,448 | 72.45 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total direct owned industrial operating properties (a) |
1,181 | 192,142 | $ | 11,629,460 | 85.99 | % | 84.62 | % | 1,188 | 191,623 | $ | 11,545,501 | 82.70 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Completed Development Properties Portfolio (included in table above)
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# of | Square | Investment | Leased | Occupied | # of | Square | Investment | Leased | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bldgs | Feet | Balance (b) | Percent | Percent | Bldgs | Feet | Balance (b) | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
2 | 526 | $ | 46,220 | 100.00 | % | 67.49 | % | 2 | 526 | $ | 43,536 | 20.95 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Mexico |
21 | 4,390 | 217,991 | 69.75 | % | 68.27 | % | 21 | 4,390 | 207,515 | 60.75 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
41 | 16,076 | 864,351 | 84.95 | % | 83.61 | % | 44 | 16,381 | 880,133 | 82.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total North America |
64 | 20,992 | 1,128,562 | 82.15 | % | 80.00 | % | 67 | 21,297 | 1,131,184 | 76.11 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Central Europe |
39 | 9,934 | 616,066 | 58.36 | % | 50.30 | % | 40 | 10,486 | 673,570 | 48.70 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern Europe |
13 | 2,998 | 212,064 | 82.32 | % | 77.62 | % | 15 | 3,321 | 244,557 | 58.61 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern Europe |
17 | 4,801 | 325,017 | 53.44 | % | 53.44 | % | 16 | 3,915 | 280,503 | 36.36 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom |
13 | 3,163 | 334,056 | 77.33 | % | 77.33 | % | 13 | 3,162 | 325,770 | 23.32 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Europe |
82 | 20,896 | 1,487,203 | 63.54 | % | 59.03 | % | 84 | 20,884 | 1,524,400 | 44.12 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
9 | 7,237 | 1,413,886 | 74.75 | % | 67.97 | % | 10 | 8,209 | 1,434,651 | 71.02 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Korea |
2 | 214 | 19,195 | 72.05 | % | 45.88 | % | 2 | 214 | 18,727 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Asia |
11 | 7,451 | 1,433,081 | 74.67 | % | 67.34 | % | 12 | 8,423 | 1,453,378 | 71.76 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total completed development properties |
157 | 49,339 | $ | 4,048,846 | 73.14 | % | 69.21 | % | 163 | 50,604 | $ | 4,108,962 | 62.18 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Static Completed Development Portfolio Analysis (c)
# of | Square | Leased | Leased | |||||||||||||
Bldgs | Feet | Square Feet | Percent | |||||||||||||
Roll forward of static completed development portfolio: |
||||||||||||||||
As of June 30, 2010 - completed development portfolio |
163 | 51,153 | 36,792 | 71.92 | % | |||||||||||
Changes during the third quarter: |
||||||||||||||||
Net leasing activity |
1,121 | 2.17 | % | |||||||||||||
Changes to square footage |
18 | |||||||||||||||
As of September 30, 2010 - static June 30 completed development portfolio |
163 | 51,171 | 37,913 | 74.09 | % | |||||||||||
(a) | The leased percentage of the core properties, excluding completed development properties, was 90.43% and 90.06% at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. | |
(b) | As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had approximately $119.3 million and $204.1 million, respectively, of remaining costs to spend to complete and lease these properties. | |
(c) | This is a roll forward of our completed development portfolio as it existed at June 30, 2010. The roll forward does not reflect the contribution or sale of six buildings during the quarter. See the information above for the properties we owned as of September 30, 2010. |
Section III - Direct Owned
Page 3.1
Page 3.1
Third Quarter 2010 |
Direct Owned - Under Development Portfolio and Land
(in thousands, except for number of properties, acres and leased percentage)
Under Development Portfolio
Remaining | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Square | Investment | Costs to | Expected | Leased | |||||||||||||||||||
As of September 30, 2010 | Properties | Feet | Balance (a) | Incur (b) | Investment | Percentage | ||||||||||||||||||
Development - build-to-suit: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America - United States |
1 | 667 | $ | 50,638 | $ | 5,193 | $ | 55,831 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||||
Europe: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern Europe |
4 | 1,097 | 30,726 | 40,969 | 71,695 | 100.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Southern Europe |
2 | 584 | 16,567 | 23,778 | 40,345 | 100.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total Europe |
6 | 1,681 | 47,293 | 64,747 | 112,040 | 100.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Asia - Japan |
1 | 178 | 15,970 | 22,003 | 37,973 | 100.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total build-to-suit |
8 | 2,526 | 113,901 | 91,943 | 205,844 | 100.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Development - not build-to-suit: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America - United States |
1 | 270 | 20,152 | 9,971 | 30,123 | 0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Asia - Japan |
1 | 1,551 | 143,797 | 115,558 | 259,355 | 21.12 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total not build-to-suit |
2 | 1,821 | 163,949 | 125,529 | 289,478 | 17.99 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total properties under development |
10 | 4,347 | $ | 277,850 | $ | 217,472 | $ | 495,322 | 65.64 | % | ||||||||||||||
Land Held for Development
As of September 30, 2010 | As of December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Acres | Investment | Acres | Investment | |||||||||||||
North America |
6,107 | $ | 1,045,739 | 6,275 | $ | 1,061,101 | ||||||||||
Europe |
3,800 | 1,087,975 | 3,959 | 1,183,632 | ||||||||||||
Asia |
94 | 247,200 | 126 | 324,610 | ||||||||||||
Total land held for development |
10,001 | $ | 2,380,914 | 10,360 | $ | 2,569,343 | ||||||||||
Roll forward of land held for development: |
||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2009 |
$ | 2,569,343 | ||||||||||||||
Changes in land held for development during 2010: |
||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
5,009 | |||||||||||||||
Dispositions and development starts |
(206,824 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Infrastructure costs and reclasses |
44,809 | |||||||||||||||
Impairment charges |
(2,347 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates and other |
(29,076 | ) | ||||||||||||||
As of September 30, 2010 |
$ | 2,380,914 | ||||||||||||||
(a) | The investment balance includes land and construction costs, as well as leasing commissions associated with these developments that are classified as Other Assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. | |
(b) | These costs may include construction costs, capitalized interest and administrative costs, tenant improvements and leasing commissions and are translated into dollars at current rates, if applicable. |
Section III - Direct Owned
Page 3.2
Page 3.2
Third Quarter 2010
|
Direct Owned - Development Activity
(in thousands, except per square foot)
Industrial Starts
Three Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | June 30, | March 31, | Year to Date | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2010 | 2010 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
North America: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet |
270 | - | - | 270 | 667 | |||||||||||||||||
Total expected investment ($) |
30,123 | - | - | 30,123 | 57,178 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost per square foot ($) |
111.57 | - | - | 111.57 | 85.72 | |||||||||||||||||
Leased percentage at start |
0 | % | - | - | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Europe (a): |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet |
328 | 2,171 | 365 | 2,864 | 504 | |||||||||||||||||
Total expected investment ($) |
22,592 | 161,366 | 17,745 | 201,703 | 40,738 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost per square foot ($) |
68.88 | 74.33 | 48.62 | 70.43 | 80.83 | |||||||||||||||||
Leased percentage at start |
100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||||
Asia: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet |
- | 170 | 1,551 | 1,721 | - | |||||||||||||||||
Total expected investment ($) |
- | 34,976 | 234,433 | 269,409 | - | |||||||||||||||||
Cost per square foot ($) |
- | 205.74 | 151.15 | 156.54 | - | |||||||||||||||||
Leased percentage at start |
- | 100.00 | % | 0 | % | - | ||||||||||||||||
Total (a): |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet |
598 | 2,341 | 1,916 | 4,855 | 1,171 | |||||||||||||||||
Total expected investment ($) |
52,715 | 196,342 | 252,178 | 501,235 | 97,916 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost per square foot ($) |
88.15 | 83.87 | 131.62 | 103.24 | 83.62 | |||||||||||||||||
Leased percentage at start |
54.85 | % | 100.00 | % | 19.05 | % | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||||
Industrial Completions |
||||||||||||||||||||||
North America: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
None |
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
Europe: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet |
754 | 971 | 554 | 2,279 | 473 | |||||||||||||||||
Total expected investment ($) |
51,749 | 58,794 | 41,051 | 151,594 | 49,115 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost per square foot ($) |
68.63 | 60.55 | 74.10 | 66.52 | 103.84 | |||||||||||||||||
Leased percentage at completion (b) |
100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 59.38 | % | ||||||||||||||
Leased percentage at 9/30/2010 |
100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 72.23 | % | ||||||||||||||
Asia: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet |
- | - | 350 | 350 | 802 | |||||||||||||||||
Total expected investment ($) |
- | - | 90,783 | 90,783 | 177,274 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost per square foot ($) |
- | - | 259.38 | 259.38 | 221.04 | |||||||||||||||||
Leased percentage at completion (b) |
- | - | 100.00 | % | 78.86 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Leased percentage at 9/30/2010 |
- | - | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet |
754 | 971 | 904 | 2,629 | 1,275 | |||||||||||||||||
Total expected investment ($) |
51,749 | 58,794 | 131,834 | 242,377 | 226,389 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost per square foot ($) |
68.63 | 60.55 | 145.83 | 92.19 | 177.56 | |||||||||||||||||
Leased percentage at completion (b) |
100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 71.63 | % | ||||||||||||||
Leased percentage at 9/30/2010 |
100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 89.70 | % |
(a) | Amounts include a development start in the second quarter of 2010 with 0.8 million square feet and a total expected investment of $83.4 million that was 100% leased at the start of development. In June 2010, we sold the underlying land to ProLogis European Properties Fund II, and we are constructing the property on behalf of the property fund for a development fee. | |
(b) | Represents the leased percentage at the end of the quarter in which the development was completed. |
Section III - Direct Owned
Page 3.3
Page 3.3
Third Quarter 2010
|
Direct Owned - Investing Activity
(in thousands, except acres)
Inflows
Three Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | June 30, | March 31, | Year to Date | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2010 | 2010 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net proceeds from property dispositions: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Contributions to property funds and joint ventures (a): |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Completed development properties |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet |
2,042 | 554 | 773 | 3,369 | 2,965 | |||||||||||||||||
Net sales proceeds ($) |
285,011 | 38,852 | 111,208 | 435,071 | 177,924 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-development properties |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet |
- | - | - | - | 141 | |||||||||||||||||
Net sales proceeds ($) |
- | - | - | - | 11,434 | |||||||||||||||||
Land |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Acres |
- | 41 | - | 41 | - | |||||||||||||||||
Net sales proceeds ($) |
- | 34,645 | - | 34,645 | - | |||||||||||||||||
Total contributions to property funds and joint ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet |
2,042 | 554 | 773 | 3,369 | 3,106 | |||||||||||||||||
Net sales proceeds ($) |
285,011 | 73,497 | 111,208 | 469,716 | 189,358 | |||||||||||||||||
Dispositions to third parties: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Completed development properties |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet |
556 | - | - | 556 | - | |||||||||||||||||
Net sales proceeds ($) |
48,913 | - | - | 48,913 | 94 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-development properties |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet |
145 | 303 | 370 | 818 | 1,044 | |||||||||||||||||
Net sales proceeds ($) |
2,660 | 3,753 | 13,688 | 20,101 | 91,810 | |||||||||||||||||
Land |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Acres |
30 | 2 | 150 | 182 | 138 | |||||||||||||||||
Net sales proceeds ($) |
9,861 | 95 | 46,820 | 56,776 | 56,054 | |||||||||||||||||
Total dispositions to third parties: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet |
701 | 303 | 370 | 1,374 | 1,044 | |||||||||||||||||
Net sales proceeds ($) |
61,434 | 3,848 | 60,508 | 125,790 | 147,958 | |||||||||||||||||
Total property dispositions: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet |
2,743 | 857 | 1,143 | 4,743 | 4,150 | |||||||||||||||||
Net sales proceeds ($) |
346,445 | 77,345 | 171,716 | 595,506 | 337,316 | |||||||||||||||||
Outflows | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | June 30, | March 31, | Year to Date | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2010 | 2010 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
Property acquisitions: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating properties: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet |
1,387 | 1,029 | - | 2,416 | - | |||||||||||||||||
Total purchase price ($) |
67,735 | 60,875 | - | 128,610 | - | |||||||||||||||||
Percentage Leased as of 9/30/10 |
72.04 | % | 80.98 | % | - | 75.84 | % | - | ||||||||||||||
Land: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Acres |
10 | 23 | - | 33 | 76 | |||||||||||||||||
Total purchase price ($) |
3,979 | 1,030 | - | 5,009 | 12,824 | |||||||||||||||||
Investments in property funds: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital contributions ($) (b) |
94,486 | 23,363 | 7,494 | 125,343 | 95,067 | |||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions of investment interest ($) (c) |
- | - | 109,237 | 109,237 | 59,394 |
(a) | Includes contributions to entities in which we have an investment that is accounted for by the equity method. | |
(b) | Amounts include cash contributions we made to the property funds and investment interests we received in exchange for properties contributed. See notes on Page 4.1 for more detail. | |
(c) | In the first quarter of 2010, we purchased 15.8 million common equity units of ProLogis European Properties (PEPR), and in the fourth quarter of 2009, we invested in PEPR preferred stock. |
Section III - Direct Owned
Page 3.4
Page 3.4
Third Quarter 2010 |
Investment
Management - ProLogis Investments in Unconsolidated Investees
(in thousands, except for percentages)
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Investment | Ownership | Investment | Ownership | |||||||||||||
Balance | Percentage | Balance | Percentage | |||||||||||||
Property funds: |
||||||||||||||||
ProLogis California LLC |
$ | 90,996 | 50.0 | % | $ | 94,498 | 50.0 | % | ||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund I |
17,000 | 41.3 | % | 21,295 | 41.3 | % | ||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Funds VI-VIII (a) |
76,821 | 20.0 | % | 78,996 | 20.0 | % | ||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund XI (b) |
30,052 | 20.0 | % | 22,115 | 20.0 | % | ||||||||||
ProLogis North American Industrial Fund |
237,545 | 23.1 | % | 241,988 | 23.0 | % | ||||||||||
ProLogis North American Industrial Fund II (c) |
390,501 | 37.0 | % | 336,511 | 37.0 | % | ||||||||||
ProLogis North American Industrial Fund III |
135,351 | 20.0 | % | 140,047 | 20.0 | % | ||||||||||
ProLogis Mexico Industrial Fund (d) |
52,413 | 20.0 | % | 74,754 | 24.2 | % | ||||||||||
ProLogis
European Properties (PEPR) (e) |
493,056 | 33.1 | % | 383,389 | 24.8 | % | ||||||||||
ProLogis
European Properties Fund II (PEPF II) (f) |
478,853 | 30.9 | % | 461,631 | 32.1 | % | ||||||||||
ProLogis Korea Fund |
21,561 | 20.0 | % | 21,426 | 20.0 | % | ||||||||||
Total property funds |
2,024,149 | 30.9 | % | 1,876,650 | 29.3 | % | ||||||||||
Other unconsolidated investees, by continent: |
||||||||||||||||
North America (g) |
179,598 | 148,137 | ||||||||||||||
Europe |
83,470 | 96,191 | ||||||||||||||
Asia (h) |
64,971 | 30,745 | ||||||||||||||
328,039 | 275,073 | |||||||||||||||
Total investments in and advances to unconsolidated investees |
$ | 2,352,188 | $ | 2,151,723 | ||||||||||||
(a) | See footnote 1 to Section II in Appendix A regarding a definitive sale agreement that includes our investments in these property funds. | |
(b) | On August 2, 2010, the property fund repaid maturing debt with a capital contribution from us ($6.4 million) and our fund partner. | |
(c) | On July 23, 2010, we purchased an $81.0 million loan to ProLogis North American Industrial Fund II from the lender. The loan bears interest at 8%, matures in May 2015 and is secured by 13 buildings in the property fund. | |
(d) | On August 2, 2010, the property fund called capital of $75.0 million to repay $19.5 million in amounts owed to us and $55.5 million of secured mortgage debt. As a result, we contributed $1.1 million of cash and reduced our ownership in the property fund to 20%. | |
(e) | During the first quarter of 2010, we purchased 15.8 million common equity units of PEPR for 80.4 million, which increased our common equity ownership percentage. | |
(f) | During the second quarter of 2010, we contributed 41 acres and one completed development building for $73.5 million to this property fund. We are developing a 0.8 million square foot building on the land on behalf of the property fund in exchange for a development fee. The capital commitments of this property fund expired August 16, 2010. In the final capital call on July 30, 2010, the property fund called capital of 282 million to acquire properties from us (we contributed five development properties with 1.2 million square feet for $78.8 million during the third quarter) and to fund future capital needs. We contributed $87.0 million of cash (21.6% of the capital call), which further reduced our ownership in the property fund. | |
(g) | During the third quarter of 2010, one of the unconsolidated investees paid maturing debt with a capital contribution from us ($33.3 million) and our partner. | |
(h) | We sold 90% of two completed development properties in Japan, one in the first quarter of 2010 and one in the third quarter of 2010, for $88.4 million and $206.2 million, respectively. We will continue to own 10% of the properties, which are accounted for under the equity method of accounting, and we will continue to manage the properties. In a separate unconsolidated investee in Japan, we received $16.0 million of cash during the third quarter of 2010 for the redemption of a portion of our common equity units. |
Section IV
- Investment Management
Page 4.1
Page 4.1
Third Quarter 2010 |
Investment Management Operating Portfolio of Property Funds
(in thousands, except for percentages)
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# of | Square | Current | Leased | Occupied | # of | Square | Current | Leased | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bldgs | Feet | Investment (a) | Percent | Percent | Bldgs | Feet | Investment (a) | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating industrial properties: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis California LLC |
80 | 14,178 | $ | 704,669 | 96.91 | % | 95.06 | % | 80 | 14,178 | $ | 700,588 | 94.19 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund I |
35 | 9,033 | 377,173 | 95.44 | % | 95.44 | % | 35 | 9,033 | 376,176 | 97.04 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund VI-VIII |
74 | 17,653 | 1,101,707 | 89.90 | % | 89.82 | % | 74 | 17,653 | 1,100,865 | 90.80 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund XI |
12 | 3,616 | 183,453 | 96.13 | % | 95.44 | % | 12 | 3,616 | 181,869 | 96.80 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Industrial Fund |
258 | 49,909 | 2,978,156 | 94.09 | % | 93.59 | % | 258 | 49,656 | 2,948,285 | 94.85 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Industrial Fund II |
148 | 36,018 | 2,177,249 | 92.41 | % | 90.89 | % | 148 | 36,018 | 2,170,506 | 89.72 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Industrial Fund III |
120 | 24,693 | 1,757,473 | 85.03 | % | 84.29 | % | 120 | 24,693 | 1,752,896 | 92.10 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis Mexico Industrial Fund |
72 | 9,144 | 579,396 | 91.13 | % | 91.13 | % | 72 | 9,144 | 573,849 | 86.41 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total North America |
799 | 164,244 | 9,859,276 | 92.11 | % | 91.33 | % | 799 | 163,991 | 9,805,034 | 92.51 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe Funds |
435 | 103,130 | 8,799,070 | 93.56 | % | 92.88 | % | 428 | 101,019 | 9,097,816 | 96.27 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia - ProLogis Korea Fund |
12 | 1,734 | 153,295 | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 12 | 1,734 | 150,176 | 97.82 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sub-total |
1,246 | 269,108 | 18,811,641 | 92.72 | % | 91.98 | % | 1,239 | 266,744 | 19,053,026 | 93.97 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund IX-X (b) |
- | - | - | - | 48 | 7,497 | 415,863 | 78.37 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total investment
management operating
portfolio |
1,246 | 269,108 | $ | 18,811,641 | 92.72 | % | 91.98 | % | 1,287 | 274,241 | $ | 19,468,889 | 93.54 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | The current investment represents the property funds investment balance in the real estate; not our proportionate share. | |
(b) | During the fourth quarter of 2009, we recognized an impairment charge that represented the entire carrying value of our investments in ProLogis North American Properties Funds IX and X, due to indications that we may not be able to recover our investment. Therefore, we have not included these funds in the 2010 information in this Supplemental Package. During the second quarter of 2010, ProLogis North American Properties Fund IX conveyed all its properties to the lender with no additional charge or loss to us. |
Section IV
- Investment Management
Page 4.2
Page 4.2
Third Quarter 2010 |
Investment Management - Summarized Financial Information of Property Funds
FFO and Net Earnings (Loss) of the Property Funds, Combined
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
North American | European | Asian | ||||||||||||||
Funds (1) | Funds (2) | Funds (3) | Total | |||||||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 199,456 | $ | 171,409 | $ | 2,785 | $ | 373,650 | ||||||||
Rental expenses |
(49,090 | ) | (36,908 | ) | (371 | ) | (86,369 | ) | ||||||||
Net operating income from properties |
150,366 | 134,501 | 2,414 | 287,281 | ||||||||||||
Other expense, net, including G&A |
(5,873 | ) | (7,560 | ) | (168 | ) | (13,601 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense (4) |
(86,197 | ) | (53,256 | ) | (737 | ) | (140,190 | ) | ||||||||
Current income tax benefit (expense) |
(545 | ) | (5,482 | ) | - | (6,027 | ) | |||||||||
FFO of the property funds |
57,751 | 68,203 | 1,509 | 127,463 | ||||||||||||
Real estate related depreciation and amortization |
(74,971 | ) | (52,466 | ) | (749 | ) | (128,186 | ) | ||||||||
Unrealized losses on derivative contracts (4) |
(3,921 | ) | (2,449 | ) | - | (6,370 | ) | |||||||||
Other income (expense), net, including deferred tax and foreign currency |
4,892 | 1,182 | - | 6,074 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) of the property funds |
$ | (16,249 | ) | $ | 14,470 | $ | 760 | $ | (1,019 | ) | ||||||
ProLogis Share of FFO and Net Earnings (Loss) of the Property Funds, Combined
|
||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
North American | European | Asian | ||||||||||||||
Funds (1) | Funds (2) | Funds (3) | Total | |||||||||||||
ProLogis share of the property funds FFO (5) |
$ | 17,243 | $ | 21,709 | $ | 300 | $ | 39,252 | ||||||||
Interest and preferred dividend income (6) |
1,666 | 1,397 | - | 3,063 | ||||||||||||
Fees paid to ProLogis (7)(8) |
15,498 | 14,495 | 187 | 30,180 | ||||||||||||
FFO recognized by ProLogis |
$ | 34,407 | $ | 37,601 | $ | 487 | $ | 72,495 | ||||||||
ProLogis share of the property funds net earnings (loss) (5) |
$ | (1,692 | ) | $ | 5,933 | $ | 151 | $ | 4,392 | |||||||
Interest and preferred dividend income (6) |
1,666 | 1,397 | - | 3,063 | ||||||||||||
Fees paid to ProLogis (7)(8) |
15,498 | 14,495 | 187 | 30,180 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings recognized by ProLogis |
$ | 15,472 | $ | 21,825 | $ | 338 | $ | 37,635 | ||||||||
See our Consolidated Statements of Operations on Page 2.2, Consolidated Statements of FFO on Page 2.3 and the Reconciliations of Net Earnings (Loss)
to FFO on Page 2.4.
Note references are to Appendix A.
Section IV - Investment Management
Page 4.3
Page 4.3
Third Quarter 2010 |
Investment
Management - Summarized Financial Information of Property Funds
(dollars in thousands)
FFO and Net Earnings (Loss) of the Property Funds, Combined
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
North American | European | Asian | ||||||||||||||
Funds (1) | Funds (2) | Funds (3) | Total | |||||||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 600,593 | $ | 527,605 | $ | 8,447 | $ | 1,136,645 | ||||||||
Rental expenses |
(149,735 | ) | (120,393 | ) | (593 | ) | (270,721 | ) | ||||||||
Net operating income from properties |
450,858 | 407,212 | 7,854 | 865,924 | ||||||||||||
Other expense, net, including G&A |
(18,200 | ) | (20,081 | ) | (690 | ) | (38,971 | ) | ||||||||
Impairment of real estate properties |
(12,368 | ) | - | - | (12,368 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
- | (2,059 | ) | - | (2,059 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest expense and other (4) |
(274,180 | ) | (159,619 | ) | (2,223 | ) | (436,022 | ) | ||||||||
Current income tax expense |
(1,812 | ) | (17,219 | ) | (1 | ) | (19,032 | ) | ||||||||
FFO of the property funds |
144,298 | 208,234 | 4,940 | 357,472 | ||||||||||||
Real estate related depreciation and amortization |
(223,498 | ) | (161,157 | ) | (2,262 | ) | (386,917 | ) | ||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative contracts (4) |
336 | (9,068 | ) | - | (8,732 | ) | ||||||||||
Other income (expense), net, including deferred tax and foreign currency |
5,293 | (330 | ) | 10 | 4,973 | |||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) of the property funds |
$ | (73,571 | ) | $ | 37,679 | $ | 2,688 | $ | (33,204 | ) | ||||||
ProLogis Share of FFO and Net Earnings (Loss) of the Property Funds, Combined
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
North American | European | Asian | ||||||||||||||
Funds (1) | Funds (2) | Funds (3) | Total | |||||||||||||
ProLogis share of the property funds FFO (5) |
$ | 43,126 | $ | 64,827 | $ | 987 | $ | 108,940 | ||||||||
Interest and preferred dividend income (6) |
2,754 | 4,322 | - | 7,076 | ||||||||||||
Fees paid to ProLogis (7)(8) |
44,586 | 39,762 | 563 | 84,911 | ||||||||||||
FFO recognized by ProLogis, including
significant non-cash items |
90,466 | 108,911 | 1,550 | 200,927 | ||||||||||||
Impairment of real estate properties |
3,000 | - | - | 3,000 | ||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
- | 575 | - | 575 | ||||||||||||
FFO recognized by ProLogis, excluding
significant non-cash items |
$ | 93,466 | $ | 109,486 | $ | 1,550 | $ | 204,502 | ||||||||
ProLogis share of the property funds net earnings (loss) (5) |
$ | (10,979 | ) | $ | 16,671 | $ | 537 | $ | 6,229 | |||||||
Interest and preferred dividend income (6) |
2,754 | 4,322 | - | 7,076 | ||||||||||||
Fees paid to ProLogis (7)(8) |
44,586 | 39,762 | 563 | 84,911 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings recognized by ProLogis |
$ | 36,361 | $ | 60,755 | $ | 1,100 | $ | 98,216 | ||||||||
Condensed Balance Sheet of the Property Funds, Combined
As of September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
North American | European | Asian | ||||||||||||||
Funds (1) | Funds (2) | Funds (3) | Total | |||||||||||||
Operating industrial properties, before depreciation |
$ | 9,859,276 | $ | 8,799,070 | $ | 153,295 | $ | 18,811,641 | ||||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(1,086,434 | ) | (917,969 | ) | (7,487 | ) | (2,011,890 | ) | ||||||||
Properties under development and land |
- | 50,756 | - | 50,756 | ||||||||||||
Other assets |
364,252 | 730,631 | 6,365 | 1,101,248 | ||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 9,137,094 | $ | 8,662,488 | $ | 152,173 | $ | 17,951,755 | ||||||||
Third party debt |
$ | 4,894,254 | $ | 3,675,638 | $ | 49,024 | $ | 8,618,916 | ||||||||
Other liabilities |
387,806 | 792,924 | 3,423 | 1,184,153 | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 5,282,060 | $ | 4,468,562 | $ | 52,447 | $ | 9,803,069 | ||||||||
See our Consolidated Statements of Operations on Page 2.2, Consolidated Statements of FFO on Page 2.3 and the Reconciliations of Net Earnings (Loss)
to FFO on Page 2.4.
Note references are to Appendix A.
Section IV - Investment Management
Page 4.4
Page 4.4
Third Quarter 2010 |
Investment
Management - Investing and Financing Activity
(in thousands, except percentages)
Investing Activities - for the property funds combined
Three Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | June 30, | March 31, | Year to Date | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2010 | 2010 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
Inflows: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Property dispositions: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet |
- | 49 | - | 49 | 601 | |||||||||||||||||
Net sales proceeds ($) |
- | 377 | - | 377 | 45,087 | |||||||||||||||||
Outflows: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Land and operating properties acquired from ProLogis: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet |
1,240 | 554 | 253 | 2,047 | 3,106 | |||||||||||||||||
Purchase price of assets acquired (a) ($) |
78,788 | 73,497 | 22,800 | 175,085 | 189,358 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating properties acquired from third parties: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet |
- | 207 | - | 207 | - | |||||||||||||||||
Purchase price of assets acquired ($) |
- | 15,592 | - | 15,592 | - |
Financing Activities - for each property fund, if applicable (b)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 | September 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Principal | Wtd. Avg. Int. Rate | Principal | Wtd. Avg. Int. Rate | |||||||||||||
Debt issued: |
||||||||||||||||
ProLogis European Properties |
$ | - | $ | 559,937 | 5.06 | % | ||||||||||
ProLogis European Properties Fund II |
156,643 | 4.26 | % | 647,488 | 4.77 | % | ||||||||||
ProLogis North American Industrial Fund II |
- | 152,000 | 7.23 | % | ||||||||||||
Total issued |
$ | 156,643 | $ | 1,359,425 | ||||||||||||
Debt repaid: |
||||||||||||||||
ProLogis European Properties |
$ | (2,466 | ) | 7.63 | % | $ | (571,440 | ) | 3.28 | % | ||||||
ProLogis North American Industrial Fund II |
- | (136,783 | ) | 4.66 | % | |||||||||||
ProLogis North American Industrial Fund II |
- | (20,677 | ) | variable | ||||||||||||
ProLogis Mexico Fund |
(55,000 | ) | 6.00 | % | (55,000 | ) | 6.00 | % | ||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund XI |
(31,976 | ) | 4.15 | % | (42,317 | ) | 4.15 | % | ||||||||
Total amortization payments during period |
(10,149 | ) | (25,802 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total repaid |
$ | (99,591 | ) | $ | (852,019 | ) | ||||||||||
Line of
credit activity, net - advances (payments): |
||||||||||||||||
ProLogis European Properties |
$ | (26,717 | ) | 2.62 | % | $ | (96,768 | ) | 2.54 | % | ||||||
ProLogis European Properties Fund II |
(175,089 | ) | 2.69 | % | (601,026 | ) | 2.28 | % | ||||||||
Line of credit activity, net |
$ | (201,806 | ) | $ | (697,794 | ) | ||||||||||
Grand total net change in debt |
$ | (144,754 | ) | $ | (190,388 | ) | ||||||||||
Debt extended: |
||||||||||||||||
ProLogis Mexico Fund to 2017 |
$ | 214,149 | 6.63 | % | $ | 214,149 | 6.63 | % | ||||||||
(a) | The purchase price reported is based on proceeds ProLogis received for these contributions. | |
(b) | Excludes changes due to foreign currency exchange rates, if applicable. See page 6.3 for debt information as of September 30, 2010. |
Section IV - Investment Management
Page 4.5
Page 4.5
Third Quarter 2010
|
Operating Statistics - Direct Owned Leasing and Capital Expenditures
(in thousands, except percentages and per square foot)
Lease Expirations
Annual Base Rent of | Percentage of | |||||||||||||||
Square | Expiring Leases | Total Annual | ||||||||||||||
Footage | Total | Per sq ft | Base Rents | |||||||||||||
Month to month customers |
4,319 | $ | 10,988 | $ | 2.54 | 1.55 | % | |||||||||
Remainder of 2010 |
2,936 | 13,980 | 4.76 | 1.97 | % | |||||||||||
2011 |
26,528 | 112,541 | 4.24 | 15.84 | % | |||||||||||
2012 |
29,039 | 122,845 | 4.23 | 17.30 | % | |||||||||||
2013 |
25,399 | 113,848 | 4.48 | 16.03 | % | |||||||||||
2014 |
23,170 | 101,686 | 4.39 | 14.32 | % | |||||||||||
2015 |
18,033 | 77,842 | 4.32 | 10.96 | % | |||||||||||
2016 |
8,677 | 38,246 | 4.41 | 5.38 | % | |||||||||||
2017 |
4,395 | 21,709 | 4.94 | 3.06 | % | |||||||||||
2018 |
3,578 | 17,479 | 4.89 | 2.46 | % | |||||||||||
2019 |
5,419 | 26,188 | 4.83 | 3.69 | % | |||||||||||
Thereafter |
11,095 | 52,924 | 4.77 | 7.44 | % | |||||||||||
Totals |
162,588 | $ | 710,276 | $ | 4.37 | 100.00 | % | |||||||||
Leasing Activity (a)
Three Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | June 30, | March 31, | Year to Date | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2010 | 2010 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet of leases signed during the period: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development properties - new leases over one year |
2,166 | 4,569 | 3,778 | 10,513 | 5,244 | |||||||||||||||||||
Development properties - new leases less than one year |
477 | 406 | 234 | 1,117 | 133 | |||||||||||||||||||
Development properties - renewals |
532 | 378 | 256 | 1,166 | 501 | |||||||||||||||||||
Core properties - new leases |
2,934 | 3,293 | 2,801 | 9,028 | 2,741 | |||||||||||||||||||
Core
properties - renewals |
5,248 | 5,576 | 5,592 | 16,416 | 6,742 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total square feet of leases signed |
11,357 | 14,222 | 12,661 | 38,240 | 15,361 | |||||||||||||||||||
# of leases |
251 | 322 | 302 | 875 | 277 | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average customer retention |
70.5 | % | 78.1 | % | 71.7 | % | 73.3 | % | 83.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of development properties leased to repeat customers |
67.3 | % | 76.4 | % | 42.5 | % | 62.8 | % | 78.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
Turnover costs: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet |
9,097 | 9,535 | 9,045 | 27,677 | 9,964 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cost per sq ft ($) |
1.30 | 1.13 | 1.28 | 1.23 | 1.03 | |||||||||||||||||||
Capital Expenditures
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | June 30, | March 31, | Year to Date | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2010 | 2010 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures ($) |
9,452 | 6,485 | 5,351 | 21,288 | 10,500 | |||||||||||||||||||
Tenant improvements ($) |
11,104 | 9,559 | 5,233 | 25,896 | 7,189 | |||||||||||||||||||
Leasing commissions ($) |
4,977 | 4,161 | 3,828 | 12,966 | 5,096 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total |
25,533 | 20,205 | 14,412 | 60,150 | 22,785 | |||||||||||||||||||
(a) | Represents leasing activity for industrial properties. |
Section V - Operating Statistics
Page 5.1
Page 5.1
Third Quarter 2010
|
Operating
Statistics - Investment Management Leasing and Capital Expenditures
(in thousands, except percentages and per square foot)
Lease Expirations
Annual Base Rent of | Percentage of | |||||||||||||||
Square | Expiring Leases | Total Annual | ||||||||||||||
Footage | Total | Per sq ft | Base Rents | |||||||||||||
Month to month customers |
2,507 | $ | 8,587 | $ | 3.43 | 0.69 | % | |||||||||
Remainder of 2010 |
4,994 | 27,492 | 5.51 | 2.20 | % | |||||||||||
2011 |
34,668 | 163,519 | 4.72 | 13.06 | % | |||||||||||
2012 |
39,709 | 192,376 | 4.84 | 15.36 | % | |||||||||||
2013 |
36,680 | 172,935 | 4.71 | 13.81 | % | |||||||||||
2014 |
21,592 | 108,295 | 5.02 | 8.65 | % | |||||||||||
2015 |
28,824 | 138,903 | 4.82 | 11.09 | % | |||||||||||
2016 |
19,143 | 96,841 | 5.06 | 7.73 | % | |||||||||||
2017 |
14,979 | 86,489 | 5.77 | 6.91 | % | |||||||||||
2018 |
15,299 | 81,950 | 5.36 | 6.54 | % | |||||||||||
2019 |
8,508 | 50,119 | 5.89 | 4.00 | % | |||||||||||
Thereafter |
20,617 | 124,893 | 6.06 | 9.96 | % | |||||||||||
Totals |
247,520 | $ | 1,252,399 | $ | 5.06 | 100.00 | % | |||||||||
Leasing Activity
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | June 30, | March 31, | Year to Date | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2010 | 2010 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
Square feet of leases signed during the period: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet |
15,665 | 14,062 | 16,957 | 46,684 | 15,888 | |||||||||||||||||
# of leases |
160 | 188 | 196 | 544 | 187 | |||||||||||||||||
Weighted average customer retention |
79.1 | % | 81.8 | % | 76.3 | % | 78.6 | % | 85.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Turnover costs: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Square feet |
15,358 | 13,981 | 16,946 | 46,285 | 15,830 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost per sq ft ($) |
0.91 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 0.94 | 1.08 | |||||||||||||||||
Capital Expenditures (a)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | June 30, | March 31, | Year to Date | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2010 | 2010 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures ($) |
7,874 | 4,224 | 3,987 | 16,085 | 8,321 | |||||||||||||||||
Tenant improvements ($) |
8,913 | 6,060 | 6,085 | 21,058 | 7,908 | |||||||||||||||||
Leasing commissions ($) |
7,968 | 6,842 | 5,977 | 20,787 | 8,333 | |||||||||||||||||
24,755 | 17,126 | 16,049 | 57,930 | 24,562 | ||||||||||||||||||
(a) | Amounts represent the entitys expenditures, not our proportionate share. |
Section V - Operating Statistics
Page 5.2
Page 5.2
Third Quarter 2010
|
Operating Statistics - Same Store Analysis and Top Customers
(square feet in thousands)
Same Store Analysis - for the three months ended
See definitions in Appendix B.
September 30, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Adjusted | Total | Adjusted | Total | Adjusted | Total | Adjusted | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio | Portfolio (a) | Portfolio | Portfolio (a) | Portfolio | Portfolio (a) | Portfolio | Portfolio (a) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sq Ft of Same Store Population |
455,722 | 405,253 | 447,084 | 401,506 | 439,871 | 399,845 | 436,238 | 395,140 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage Change in [increase/(decrease)]: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rental Income |
(0.13%) | (4.20%) | (0.83%) | (3.50%) | (0.19%) | (3.15%) | (0.10%) | (2.67%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rental Expenses |
(1.29%) | (3.45%) | 6.81% | 6.61% | 8.61% | 7.15% | 6.28% | 2.25% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Operating Income |
0.27% | (4.45%) | (3.36%) | (6.63%) | (3.13%) | (6.39%) | (2.11%) | (4.15%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Leasing |
2.07% | (0.73%) | 1.76% | (1.23%) | 0.73% | (1.89%) | (0.12%) | (2.18%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sq Ft of Leasing Activity (b) |
23,866 | 23,052 | 22,316 | 21,554 | 25,556 | 25,085 | 24,517 | 23,560 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage Change in Rental Rate Growth (b) |
(8.51%) | (8.51%) | (15.74%) | (16.12%) | (12.25%) | (12.34%) | (12.38%) | (11.73%) |
Top Customers - Direct Owned
Percentage of | ||||||||||
Annualized | Number of | |||||||||
Rank | Customer Name | Base Rent | Leases | |||||||
1 | APL (Neptune Orient Lines) |
1.91% | 12 | |||||||
2 | Home Depot, Inc |
1.44% | 4 | |||||||
3 | Ford Motor Company |
1.16% | 6 | |||||||
4 | LG, Inc. |
1.00% | 5 | |||||||
5 | Deutsche Post AG (DHL) |
0.88% | 14 | |||||||
6 | Kellogg Company |
0.86% | 6 | |||||||
7 | Hamakyorex Co., Ltd |
0.86% | 3 | |||||||
8 | Euromarket Designs, Inc. |
0.85% | 3 | |||||||
9 | PepsiCo |
0.82% | 6 | |||||||
10 | Office Depot, Inc. |
0.81% | 3 | |||||||
11-25 | various |
9.36% | 43 | |||||||
Total |
19.95% | 105 | ||||||||
Top Customers - Investment Management
Percentage of | ||||||||||
Annualized Base | Number of | |||||||||
Rank | Customer Name | Rent | Leases | |||||||
1 | Deutsche Post AG (DHL) |
3.25% | 43 | |||||||
2 | CEVA Logistics |
2.41% | 27 | |||||||
3 | Unilever |
1.89% | 8 | |||||||
4 | SNCF Geodis |
1.62% | 13 | |||||||
5 | Kuehne & Nagel |
1.61% | 17 | |||||||
6 | NYK Group |
1.44% | 15 | |||||||
7 | Wincanton Logistics |
1.43% | 22 | |||||||
8 | Home Depot, Inc |
1.37% | 8 | |||||||
9 | Amazon.Com, Inc. |
1.19% | 7 | |||||||
10 | Kraft Foods, Inc. |
0.95% | 6 | |||||||
11-25 | various |
9.68% | 88 | |||||||
Total |
26.84% | 254 | ||||||||
(a) | This portfolio includes all same store properties as defined in Appendix B and included in the Total Portfolio, adjusted to exclude 172, 156, 136 and 156 completed development properties as of July 1, April 1 and January 1, 2009 and October 1, 2008, respectively, that we still own or manage as of the end of the period. | |
(b) | Rental rate growth represents the increase (decrease) in rental rates on new leases signed during the period, as compared with the previous rental rates in that same space, within the same store population, as defined. |
See Definitions in Appendix B.
Section V - Operating Statistics
Page 5.3
Page 5.3
Third Quarter 2010
|
Operating Statistics - Major Logistics Corridors and Total Portfolio (a)
(in thousands, except for percentage)
Investment in Major Logistics Corridors
Prorata Share of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct Owned | Investment | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment | Percentage | Management | Percentage | PLD Investment | Percentage | |||||||||||||||||||
U.S. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles Basin / Inland Empire |
$ | 1,871,019 | $ | 567,645 | $ | 2,438,664 | 26 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Chicago |
998,577 | 82,748 | 1,081,325 | 11 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco Bay Area / Central Valley |
929,668 | 51,937 | 981,605 | 10 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
New Jersey / Eastern Pennsylvania |
529,386 | 275,496 | 804,882 | 8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Dallas |
525,612 | 103,500 | 629,112 | 7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta |
299,679 | 93,625 | 393,304 | 4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Washington DC / Baltimore |
183,889 | 58,519 | 242,408 | 3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Houston |
165,812 | 59,292 | 225,104 | 2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Miami / South Florida |
160,549 | 32,613 | 193,162 | 2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
U.S. investment (percentage of total U.S.) |
$ | 5,664,191 | 77 | % | $ | 1,325,375 | 59 | % | $ | 6,989,566 | 73 | % | ||||||||||||
International |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
London / Midlands - UK |
$ | 306,627 | $ | 566,817 | $ | 873,444 | 13 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tokyo - Japan |
767,426 | - | 767,426 | 12 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Paris / Le Havre - Central France |
89,444 | 301,563 | 391,007 | 6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Warsaw / Poznan - Central Poland |
160,861 | 212,935 | 373,796 | 6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Osaka - Japan |
368,320 | - | 368,320 | 6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Wroclaw / Silesia - Southern Poland |
133,196 | 170,726 | 303,922 | 5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Lyon / Marseille - Southern France |
93,018 | 171,279 | 264,297 | 4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Amsterdam / Rotterdam / Antwerp - Benelux |
14,223 | 198,208 | 212,431 | 3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Cologne / Frankfurt - Western Germany |
27,841 | 160,186 | 188,027 | 3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Munich / Stuggart - Southern Germany |
87,062 | 84,524 | 171,586 | 3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Madrid / Barcelona - Spain |
38,277 | 122,290 | 160,567 | 2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Mexico City - Mexico |
130,424 | 23,931 | 154,355 | 2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Toronto - Canada |
46,220 | 39,034 | 85,254 | 1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Hamburg / Bremen - Northern Germany |
- | 48,108 | 48,108 | 1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
International investment (percentage of total international) |
$ | 2,262,939 | 67 | % | $ | 2,099,601 | 68 | % | $ | 4,362,540 | 67 | % | ||||||||||||
Major logistics corridors (percentage of grand total) |
$ | 7,927,130 | 74 | % | $ | 3,424,976 | 64 | % | $ | 11,352,106 | 71 | % | ||||||||||||
Total Industrial Portfolio
Prorata Share of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct Owned | Investment | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment | Management | PLD Investment | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Major U.S. corridors |
$ | 5,664,191 | 53 | % | $ | 1,325,375 | 25 | % | $ | 6,989,566 | 44 | % | ||||||||||||
Major international corridors |
2,262,939 | 21 | % | 2,099,601 | 39 | % | 4,362,540 | 27 | % | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
7,927,130 | 74 | % | 3,424,976 | 64 | % | 11,352,106 | 71 | % | |||||||||||||||
Other U.S. |
1,655,194 | 15 | % | 906,698 | 17 | % | 2,561,892 | 16 | % | |||||||||||||||
Other international |
1,139,961 | 11 | % | 1,011,261 | 19 | % | 2,151,222 | 13 | % | |||||||||||||||
Grand total industrial portfolio |
$ | 10,722,285 | 100 | % | $ | 5,342,935 | 100 | % | $ | 16,065,220 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
(a) | The portfolio includes only industrial properties and is adjusted on a proforma basis for an announced asset disposition, including direct owned and investment management properties, as discussed in footnote 1 to Section II in Appendix A. Our prorata share of investment management reflects our share of the properties based on our percentage ownership in the property fund. Percentages are based on investment dollars. |
Section V - Operating Statistics
Page 5.4
Page 5.4
Third Quarter 2010
|
Debt - ProLogis Debt Summary
(dollars in thousands)
Principal Outstanding
Interest | Due | Outstanding | Outstanding | |||||||||||
Rate(a) | Date | as of 9/30/2010 | as of 12/31/2009 | |||||||||||
Senior notes |
5.250 | % | Nov-10 | $ | 190,278 | $ | 190,278 | |||||||
Euro notes
(101.3 million) |
4.375 | % | Apr-11 | 136,522 | 145,294 | |||||||||
Senior notes |
5.500 | % | Apr-12 | 58,935 | 280,788 | |||||||||
Senior notes |
5.500 | % | Mar-13 | 61,443 | 262,066 | |||||||||
Senior notes |
7.625 | % | Aug-14 | 350,000 | 350,000 | |||||||||
Senior notes |
7.810 | % | Feb-15 | 80,000 | 100,000 | |||||||||
Senior notes |
9.340 | % | Mar-15 | 27,000 | 30,000 | |||||||||
Senior notes |
5.625 | % | Nov-15 | 387,930 | 400,000 | |||||||||
Senior notes |
5.750 | % | Apr-16 | 378,531 | 400,000 | |||||||||
Senior notes |
8.650 | % | May-16 | 45,000 | 50,000 | |||||||||
Senior notes |
5.625 | % | Nov-16 | 550,000 | 550,000 | |||||||||
Senior notes |
6.250 | % | Mar-17 | 300,000 | - | |||||||||
Senior notes |
7.625 | % | Jul-17 | 100,000 | 100,000 | |||||||||
Senior notes |
6.625 | % | May-18 | 600,000 | 600,000 | |||||||||
Senior notes |
7.375 | % | Oct-19 | 600,000 | 600,000 | |||||||||
Senior notes |
6.875 | % | Mar-20 | 800,000 | - | |||||||||
Less: discount |
(11,294 | ) | (10,521 | ) | ||||||||||
Total senior notes |
6.469 | % | 4,654,345 | 4,047,905 | ||||||||||
Convertible senior notes (2.25% coupon) (b) |
5.390 | % | Apr-12 | 780,980 | 1,103,659 | |||||||||
Convertible senior notes (1.875% coupon) (b) |
5.600 | % | Jan-13 | 236,635 | 709,130 | |||||||||
Convertible senior notes (2.625% coupon) (b) |
5.860 | % | May-13 | 406,250 | 453,718 | |||||||||
Convertible senior notes (c) |
3.250 | % | Mar-15 | 460,000 | - | |||||||||
Less: discount |
(84,590 | ) | (188,066 | ) | ||||||||||
Total convertible senior
notes |
4.995 | % | 1,799,275 | 2,078,441 | ||||||||||
Fixed rate secured mortgage debt (¥10 billion) |
2.740 | % | Dec-12 | 116,911 | 108,190 | |||||||||
Variable rate secured mortgage debt (¥0.3 billion) |
2.172 | % | Jun-13 | 3,602 | - | |||||||||
Fixed rate secured mortgage debt |
6.500 | % | Jul-14 | 101,750 | 101,750 | |||||||||
Variable rate secured mortgage debt (¥14.0 billion) (d) |
1.776 | % | Dec-14 | 168,087 | - | |||||||||
Fixed rate secured mortgage debt (¥3.4 billion) |
3.278 | % | Apr-15 | 40,821 | - | |||||||||
Fixed rate secured mortgage debt |
5.470 | % | Aug-15 | 124,688 | 126,415 | |||||||||
Fixed rate secured mortgage debt |
7.250 | % | Apr-16 | 175,124 | 177,799 | |||||||||
Fixed rate secured mortgage debt |
7.550 | % | Jul-19 | 245,500 | 245,500 | |||||||||
Fixed rate secured mortgage debt |
7.580 | % | Apr-24 | 188,531 | 190,230 | |||||||||
Fixed rate secured mortgage debt |
5.446 | % | various | 64,516 | 74,547 | |||||||||
Debt matured/paid in 2010 |
| 45,628 | ||||||||||||
Add: premium, net |
17,765 | 20,067 | ||||||||||||
Total secured mortgage debt |
5.699 | % | 1,247,295 | 1,090,126 | ||||||||||
Assessment bonds |
6.473 | % | various | 23,805 | 24,715 | |||||||||
Global line credit facility |
2.551 | % | Aug-12 | 445,312 | 736,591 | |||||||||
Weighted average interest rate / total debt outstanding |
5.813 | % | $ | 8,170,032 | $ | 7,977,778 | ||||||||
Principal Maturities - as of September 30, 2010
Summarized by year (in millions) | ||||
2010 |
$ | 196 | ||
2011 |
184 | |||
2012 |
1,437 | |||
2013 |
781 | |||
2014 |
665 | |||
2015 |
1,040 | |||
2016 |
1,113 | |||
2017 |
406 | |||
2018 |
606 | |||
2019 |
852 | |||
Thereafter |
968 | |||
Discount |
(96 | ) | ||
Premium |
18 | |||
Total |
$ | 8,170 | ||
(a) | Interest rate is based on the stated rate and weighted based on borrowings outstanding as of September 30, 2010, except as noted. | |
(b) | The interest rates shown represent the effective interest rate (including non-cash amortization). These convertible notes mature in 2037 and 2038. However, the holders of the notes have the right to require us to repurchase their notes for cash on specific dates approximately every five years beginning in 2012 and 2013, and at any time prior to their maturity upon a change in control or, with respect to some of the notes, a termination of trading (each as defined in the notes). We have reflected the maturities in 2012 and 2013 in the schedule of debt maturities based on the cash put date. The holders of the 1.875% notes we issued in November 2007 have the option to convert their notes beginning in November 2012. | |
(c) | These notes are convertible at any time by holders at an initial conversion rate of 57.8503 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes, equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $17.29 per share, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events. The holders of the notes have the right to require us to repurchase their notes for cash at any time on or prior to the maturity date upon a change in control or a termination of trading (each as defined in the notes). | |
(d) | We issued this debt in the third quarter of 2010. |
Section VI - Debt
Page 6.1
Page 6.1
Third Quarter 2010 |
Debt - ProLogis Debt and Equity
(dollars and shares in thousands)
Global Line of Credit - as of September 30, 2010
Information related to our Global Line (dollars in millions): |
||||
Aggregate lender - commitments (a) |
$ | 2,326.8 | ||
Less: |
||||
Borrowings outstanding |
445.3 | |||
Outstanding letters of credit |
95.7 | |||
Current availability |
$ | 1,785.8 | ||
Financing Activity (b)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 | September 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Principal | Interest Rate | Principal | Interest Rate | |||||||||||||
Debt issued: |
||||||||||||||||
Senior notes: |
||||||||||||||||
Due 2017 |
$ | - | $ | 300,000 | 6.250 | % | ||||||||||
Due 2020 |
- | 800,000 | 6.875 | % | ||||||||||||
Convertible senior notes: |
||||||||||||||||
Due 2015 |
- | 460,000 | 3.250 | % | ||||||||||||
Secured mortgage debt: |
||||||||||||||||
Due 2013 |
- | 86,696 | 2.130 | % | ||||||||||||
Due 2013 |
- | 3,310 | 2.190 | % | ||||||||||||
Due 2014 |
166,745 | 1.776 | % | 166,745 | 1.776 | % | ||||||||||
Due 2015 |
- | 36,727 | 3.278 | % | ||||||||||||
Total debt issued |
$ | 166,745 | $ | 1,853,478 | ||||||||||||
Debt repaid / repurchased: |
||||||||||||||||
Senior notes: |
||||||||||||||||
Due 2012 |
$ | - | $ | (221,853 | ) | 5.500 | % | |||||||||
Due 2013 |
- | (200,623 | ) | 5.500 | % | |||||||||||
Due 2015 |
(12,070 | ) | 5.625 | % | (12,070 | ) | 5.625 | % | ||||||||
Due 2016 |
(21,469 | ) | 5.750 | % | (21,469 | ) | 5.750 | % | ||||||||
Convertible senior notes: |
||||||||||||||||
Due 2012 |
(42,000 | ) | 5.390 | % | (322,679 | ) | 5.390 | % | ||||||||
Due 2013 |
(61,000 | ) | 5.600 | % | (472,495 | ) | 5.600 | % | ||||||||
Due 2013 |
- | (47,468 | ) | 5.860 | % | |||||||||||
Secured mortgage debt: |
||||||||||||||||
Due 2012 |
- | (4,910 | ) | 6.000 | % | |||||||||||
Due 2012 |
- | (45,140 | ) | 4.090 | % | |||||||||||
Due 2013 |
- | (4,583 | ) | 5.560 | % | |||||||||||
Due 2013 |
(89,581 | ) | 2.190 | % | (94,893 | ) | 2.190 | % | ||||||||
Total amortization payments during period |
(3,989 | ) | (39,626 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total debt repaid / repurchased |
$ | (230,109 | ) | $ | (1,487,809 | ) | ||||||||||
Global Line activity, net - advances (payments) |
$ | 11,388 | $ | (291,279 | ) | |||||||||||
Grand total, net activity |
$ | (51,976 | ) | $ | 74,390 | |||||||||||
Market Capitalization
Shares or Equivalents | Market Price - as of | Market Value | ||||||||||
Outstanding | September 30, 2010 | Equivalents | ||||||||||
8.54% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares |
2,000 | $ | 52.75 | $ | 105,500 | |||||||
6.75% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares |
5,000 | $ | 23.57 | 117,850 | ||||||||
6.75% Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares |
5,000 | $ | 23.45 | 117,250 | ||||||||
12,000 | 340,600 | |||||||||||
Common Shares |
477,009 | $ | 11.78 | 5,619,166 | ||||||||
Convertible limited partnership units |
760 | $ | 11.78 | 8,953 | ||||||||
477,769 | 5,628,119 | |||||||||||
Total equity |
5,968,719 | |||||||||||
Total debt |
8,170,032 | |||||||||||
Total market capitalization |
$ | 14,138,751 | ||||||||||
(a) | The aggregate lender commitments under our Global Line are approximately $2.3 billion, subject to currency fluctuations. See Appendix B for details. | |
(b) | Excludes changes due to foreign exchange rates, if applicable. |
Section VI
- Debt
Page 6.2
Page 6.2
Third Quarter 2010 |
Debt - Property Fund Debt Summary
(dollars in thousands)
Principal maturities of third party debt for each property fund - as of September 30, 2010
Wtd. Avg. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Int. Rate | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis California LLC |
7.24 | % | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 137,500 | $ | - | ||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund I (a) |
7.59 | % | 122,740 | 111,750 | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Funds VI-VIII |
5.42 | % | 68 | 281 | 625,798 | 12,422 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund XI |
6.92 | % | 150 | 626 | 670 | 413 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Industrial Fund |
5.76 | % | - | - | 52,000 | 80,000 | - | 108,665 | ||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Industrial Fund II |
6.32 | % | 2,500 | 10,000 | 164,000 | 74,000 | 526,392 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Industrial Fund III |
5.74 | % | 655 | 120,705 | 87,895 | 385,571 | 146,462 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis Mexico Industrial Fund |
6.63 | % | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis European Properties |
5.59 | % | - | - | 342,620 | 530,590 | 1,235,301 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis European Properties Fund II (b) |
4.97 | % | - | - | 149,830 | 638,829 | 477,299 | 253,164 | ||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis Korea Fund |
6.11 | % | - | 16,283 | 32,741 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 126,113 | $ | 259,645 | $ | 1,455,554 | $ | 1,721,825 | $ | 2,522,954 | $ | 361,829 | ||||||||||||||||
Grand | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Discount | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis California LLC |
$ | 52,500 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 120,000 | $ | - | $ | 310,000 | ||||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund I |
- | - | - | - | - | 234,490 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Funds VI-VIII |
- | - | - | - | - | 638,569 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund XI |
- | - | - | - | 42 | 1,901 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Industrial Fund |
444,000 | 394,000 | 165,500 | - | - | 1,244,165 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Industrial Fund II |
136,500 | 221,000 | 104,700 | - | (7,291 | ) | 1,231,801 | |||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Industrial Fund III |
- | - | 280,000 | - | (2,109 | ) | 1,019,179 | |||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis Mexico Industrial Fund |
- | 214,149 | - | - | - | 214,149 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis European Properties |
- | - | - | - | - | 2,108,511 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis European Properties Fund II |
- | - | - | 48,005 | - | 1,567,127 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis Korea Fund |
- | - | - | - | - | 49,024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 633,000 | $ | 829,149 | $ | 550,200 | $ | 168,005 | $ | (9,358 | ) | $ | 8,618,916 | |||||||||||||||
Principal maturities of third party debt for the property funds combined - as of September 30, 2010
Line of credit information for each property fund, as applicable - as of September 30, 2010
Total | Debt | Remaining | ||||||||||||||
Maturity | Commitment | Balance | Capacity | |||||||||||||
ProLogis European Properties (c) |
8/13/2013 | $ | 67,385 | $ | 4,754 | $ | 62,631 | |||||||||
ProLogis European Properties Fund II (d) |
8/2/2013 | 101,078 | - | 101,078 | ||||||||||||
$ | 168,463 | $ | 4,754 | $ | 163,709 | |||||||||||
(a) | The ProLogis North American Properties Fund I expects to refinance the 2010 and 2011 maturities with a new $180 million two-year term loan and capital contributions from the fund partners (our share is $23 million). The new loan has a two-year renewal option and is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2010. | |
(b) | On October 15, 2010, ProLogis European Properties Fund II repaid 57.1 million ($80.4 million) of secured mortgage debt that matures in 2013 and expects to repay another 31.8 million on the same debt in November 2010. | |
(c) | ProLogis European Properties issued a new credit facility with a limit of 50 million, with the ability to increase to 150 million. This line of credit is denominated in euro and British pound. Amount is shown in U.S. dollars using the exchange rate as of September 30, 2010. | |
(d) | The ProLogis European Properties Fund II credit facility was terminated on July 30, 2010. The fund issued a new credit facility on August 2, 2010, with a limit of 75 million and the ability to increase to 150 million. This line of credit is denominated in euro and British pound. Amount is shown in U.S. dollars using the exchange rate as of September 30, 2010. |
Section VI
- Debt
Page 6.3
Page 6.3
Third Quarter 2010 |
Debt - ProLogis Debt Covenant Ratios
Global Line of Credit
Actual | ||||||||
Required | Compliance | |||||||
Financial Covenant |
Compliance | at 9/30/2010 | ||||||
Minimum Net Worth |
> $6.8 billion | $8.6 billion | ||||||
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio |
> 1.50 | 1.76 | ||||||
Unencumbered Debt Service Coverage Ratio |
> 1.50 | 1.99 | ||||||
Maximum Consolidated Leverage to Total Asset Value |
< 60% | 55% | ||||||
Restricted Investment Test Limiting Non-Industrial Investments |
< 25% | 20% | ||||||
Maximum Secured Debt to Total Asset Value |
< 30% | 10% | ||||||
Certain Property NOI to Certain Specified Debt |
> 14% | 50% |
Senior Notes
Eighth and Ninth | ||||||||
Supplemental Indenture | ||||||||
Actual | ||||||||
Required | Compliance | |||||||
Financial Covenant |
Compliance | at 9/30/2010 | ||||||
Outstanding Indebtedness to Adjusted Total Assets |
< 60% | 46% | ||||||
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio |
> 1.5 | 2.0 | ||||||
Unencumbered Assets Ratio to Unsecured Debt |
> 1.5 | 2.1 | ||||||
Maximum Secured Debt to Adjusted Total Assets |
< 40% | 7% |
See
Definitions in Appendix B.
Section VI - Debt
Page 6.4
Page 6.4
Third Quarter 2010 |
Components of Net Asset Value for ProLogis (1)
(in thousands, except for percentages and per square foot)
Direct Owned
Investment | Inv. Bal. | Annualized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sq. Ft. | Balance | per Sq. Ft. | NOI (2) | NOI (2) | % Leased | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating properties: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Core > 75% leased |
124,443 | $ | 6,703,224 | $ | 54 | $ | 108,735 | $ | 434,940 | 98.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Core < 75% leased |
18,360 | 877,390 | 48 | 5,250 | 21,000 | 33.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail and mixed use |
1,150 | 304,358 | 265 | 3,640 | 14,560 | 90.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Land subject to ground leases and other |
372,823 | 6,143 | 24,572 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total core and other |
143,953 | $ | 8,257,795 | $ | 55 | $ | 123,768 | $ | 495,072 | 90.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Pro Forma | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment | Total | TEI | Pro Forma | Annualized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sq. Ft. | Balance | Expected Inv. | per Sq. Ft. | NOI (2) | NOI | % Leased | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Development properties: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Completed development > 75% leased |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
15,904 | $ | 889,721 | $ | 903,733 | $ | 57 | $ | 14,268 | $ | 57,072 | 97.8 | % | |||||||||||||||
Europe |
10,861 | 792,988 | 816,001 | 75 | 14,939 | 59,756 | 94.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
4,828 | 976,520 | 984,000 | 204 | 15,785 | 63,140 | 95.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Completed development < 75% leased |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
5,088 | 257,887 | 272,474 | 54 | 3,580 | 14,320 | 33.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
10,035 | 697,767 | 749,284 | 75 | 13,046 | 52,184 | 30.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
2,623 | 456,321 | 464,966 | 177 | 6,551 | 26,204 | 35.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total completed development |
49,339 | $ | 4,071,204 | $ | 4,190,458 | $ | 85 | $ | 68,169 | $ | 272,676 | 73.1 | % | |||||||||||||||
Properties under development |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Build-to-suit: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
667 | $ | 50,638 | $ | 55,831 | $ | 84 | $ | 1,307 | $ | 5,228 | |||||||||||||||||
Europe |
1,681 | 47,293 | 112,040 | 67 | 2,196 | 8,784 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
178 | 15,970 | 37,973 | 213 | 549 | 2,196 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total build-to-suit |
2,526 | 113,901 | 205,844 | 81 | 4,052 | 16,208 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Not build-to-suit: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
270 | 20,152 | 30,123 | 112 | 514 | 2,056 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
1,551 | 143,797 | 259,355 | 167 | 4,403 | 17,612 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total not build-to-suit |
1,821 | 163,949 | 289,478 | 159 | 4,917 | 19,668 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total properties under development |
4,347 | $ | 277,850 | $ | 495,322 | $ | 114 | $ | 8,969 | (3) | $ | 35,876 | ||||||||||||||||
Investment | Actual Third | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Quarter 2010 | Year-to-Date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land held for development |
$ | 2,380,914 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development management and other income |
$ | 4,784 | $ | 8,494 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See Page 7.3 for note references
Section VII - Net Asset Value
Page 7.1
Page 7.1
Third Quarter 2010 |
Components of Net Asset Value for ProLogis - Continued (1)
(in thousands, except for percentages and per unit)
Investment Management
ProLogis share | ProLogis share | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment | ProLogis share | Annualized | Debt, Net of | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Sq. Ft. | NOI (4) | NOI | Other Net Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis interest in Funds: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 1,030,679 | 164,244 | $ | 61,918 | $ | 247,672 | $ | (2,142,893 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Asia |
$ | 21,561 | 1,734 | $ | 482 | $ | 1,928 | $ | (9,192 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Investment | # of | Value per | Calculated | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sq. Ft. | Balance | Units | Unit (6) | USD / EUR | Value | |||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis ownership in Europe Funds (5): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
PEPR |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Equity |
63,063 | | 5.99 | 1.36 | $ | 513,736 | ||||||||||||||||||
Preferred Equity |
7,016 | | 6.01 | 1.36 | 57,346 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total investment in PEPR |
52,977 | $ | 493,056 | $ | 571,082 | |||||||||||||||||||
PEPF II |
50,153 | $ | 478,853 | 86,684 | | 5.51 | 1.36 | $ | 649,575 | |||||||||||||||
Actual Third | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter 2010 | Annualized | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment management fees |
$ | 29,262 | $ | 117,048 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Investment management expenses |
(9,829 | ) | (39,316 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
19,433 | 77,732 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Balance Sheet Items
As of | ||||
September 30, 2010 | ||||
Other assets: |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 17,799 | ||
Deposits, prepaid assets and other tangible assets (7) |
527,174 | |||
Accounts and notes receivable |
123,186 | |||
Investments in and advances to other unconsolidated investees |
328,039 | |||
Total other assets |
$ | 996,198 | ||
Liabilities and preferred equity: |
||||
Debt (8) |
$ | 8,170,032 | ||
Discount on debt, net |
78,119 | |||
Total debt |
8,248,151 | |||
Other liabilities, payables, and accrued expenses |
916,805 | |||
Preferred shares |
350,000 | |||
Total liabilities and preferred shares |
$ | 9,514,956 | ||
Total common shares and convertible limited partnership units outstanding (8) |
477,769 | |||
See Page 7.3 for note references
Section VII - Net Asset Value
Page 7.2
Page 7.2
Third Quarter 2010 |
Notes to Net Asset Value
(1) | The components of Net Asset Value do not consider the potential changes in rental and fee income streams or the franchise value associated with our global operating platform. This disclosure has not been adjusted for the pending disposition discussed in footnote 1 to Section II of Appendix A. |
(2) | A reconciliation of our rental income and rental expenses, computed under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), to pro forma net operating income (NOI) for purposes of the Net Asset Value calculation is as follows: |
(in thousands) | Core | Core - Completed | Total | |||||||||
and Other | Development | ProLogis | ||||||||||
Calculation of pro forma NOI: |
||||||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 177,379 | $ | 58,689 | $ | 236,068 | ||||||
Rental expenses |
(52,724 | ) | (16,371 | ) | (69,095 | ) | ||||||
Net termination fees and adjustments (a) |
(1,421 | ) | (79 | ) | (1,500 | ) | ||||||
Adjusted NOI |
123,234 | 42,239 | 165,473 | |||||||||
Less: NOI on contributed properties (b) |
- | (2,829 | ) | (2,829 | ) | |||||||
NOI for properties owned at September 30, 2010 |
123,234 | 39,410 | 162,644 | |||||||||
Add: proforma adjustment (c) |
534 | 28,759 | 29,293 | |||||||||
Pro forma NOI - GAAP |
123,768 | 68,169 | 191,937 | |||||||||
Straight-lined rents and amortization of lease intangibles (d) |
(3,220 | ) | (5,656 | ) | (8,876 | ) | ||||||
Pro forma NOI - CASH |
$ | 120,548 | $ | 62,513 | $ | 183,061 | ||||||
(a) | Net termination fees generally represent the gross fee negotiated at the time a customer is allowed to terminate its lease agreement offset by that customers rent leveling asset or liability, if any, that has been previously recognized under GAAP. Removing the net termination fees from rental income allows for the calculation of pro forma NOI to include only rental income that is indicative of the propertys recurring operating performance. | |
(b) | The actual NOI for properties that were contributed and not part of discontinued operations during the three-month period is removed. | |
(c) | This incremental adjustment is necessary to reflect a full period of NOI for core properties acquired during the quarter and for our Completed Development properties using an estimated stabilized yield. | |
(d) | Straight-lined rents and amortization of above and below market leases are removed from rental income computed under GAAP to allow for the calculation of a cash yield. |
(3) | Pro forma NOI for our properties under development is based on current total expected investment and an estimated stabilized yield. | |
(4) | A reconciliation of rental income and rental expenses, computed under GAAP, to pro forma NOI for purposes of the Net Asset Value calculation for the property funds, excluding PEPR and PEPF II, for the three months ended September 30, 2010 is included below. |
ProLogis | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | Mexico | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | California | Properties | Properties | Properties | Industrial | Industrial | Industrial | Industrial | Korea | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LLC | Fund I | Funds VI-VIII | Fund XI | Fund | Fund II | Fund III | Fund | Fund | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis ownership interest as of 9/30/2010 |
50.0 | % | 41.3 | % | 20.0 | % | 20.0 | % | 23.1 | % | 37.0 | %(a) | 20.0 | % | 20.0 | % | 20.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Calculation of pro forma NOI: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 21,147 | $ | 9,977 | $ | 21,814 | $ | 4,476 | $ | 63,293 | $ | 38,120 | $ | 28,451 | $ | 12,053 | $ | 2,786 | ||||||||||||||||||
Rental expenses |
(4,265 | ) | (2,250 | ) | (5,087 | ) | (1,577 | ) | (17,352 | ) | (9,329 | ) | (6,748 | ) | (2,482 | ) | (374 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Net termination fees and adjustments (b) |
(62 | ) | - | 38 | - | (470 | ) | 29 | 12 | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Certain fees paid to ProLogis (c) |
165 | 96 | 220 | 53 | 637 | 400 | 315 | 79 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted NOI |
16,985 | 7,823 | 16,985 | 2,952 | 46,108 | 29,220 | 22,030 | 9,650 | 2,412 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: actual NOI on certain properties (d) |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Add: stabilized NOI on certain properties (e) |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pro forma NOI - GAAP |
16,985 | 7,823 | 16,985 | 2,952 | 46,108 | 29,220 | 22,030 | 9,650 | 2,412 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straight-lined rents and amortization of lease
intangibles (f) |
(731 | ) | 119 | (124 | ) | (28 | ) | (1,339 | ) | (220 | ) | (477 | ) | - | 95 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pro forma NOI - CASH |
$ | 16,254 | $ | 7,942 | $ | 16,861 | $ | 2,924 | $ | 44,769 | $ | 29,000 | $ | 21,553 | $ | 9,650 | $ | 2,507 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pro forma NOI - GAAP (ProLogis share) |
$ | 8,493 | $ | 3,231 | $ | 3,397 | $ | 590 | $ | 10,651 | $ | 29,220 | $ | 4,406 | $ | 1,930 | $ | 482 | ||||||||||||||||||
(a) | Our aggregate ownership interest in the North American funds has been adjusted to reflect 100% of the NOI of North American Industrial Fund II (NAIF II), versus our GAAP ownership interest of 37.0%, to account for our preferred interest in NAIF II. | |
(b) | Net termination fees generally represent the gross fee negotiated at the time a customer is allowed to terminate its lease agreement offset by that customers rent leveling asset or liability, if any, that has been previously recognized under GAAP. Removing the net termination fees from rental income allows for the calculation of pro forma NOI to include only rental income that is indicative of the propertys recurring operating performance. | |
(c) | These miscellaneous fees are added back as an offset to rental expense because they represent costs that are specific to the ownership structures of the individual property fund and are not necessarily indicative of expenses that would be incurred under other structures. | |
(d) | The NOI for properties that were acquired or disposed of during the three-month period is removed. | |
(e) | NOI is adjusted to reflect a full period of operations for properties that were acquired during the three-month period. | |
(f) | Straight-lined rents and amortization of above and below market leases are removed from rental income computed under GAAP to allow for the calculation of a cash yield. |
Section
VII - Net Asset Value
Page 7.3
Page 7.3
Third Quarter 2010 |
Notes to Net Asset Value
(5) | PEPR and PEPF II are subject to valuations under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). | |
(6) | Value per unit for common equity of PEPR is based on PEPRs estimated IFRS net asset value as of June 30, 2010 and preferred equity is based on the closing price of PEPR preferred units on the Euronext Amsterdam stock exchange as of September 30, 2010. PEPRs closing price of common units on the Euronext Amsterdam stock exchange was 4.425 on September 30, 2010. Value per unit for common equity is based on PEPF IIs estimated IFRS net asset value as of September 30, 2010. | |
(7) | These items are reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as components of Other Assets and Investments in Real Estate Assets Other Investments. This includes $127.3 million of rent leveling assets. | |
(8) | Debt includes $460 million of debt that is convertible by the holders at any time at an initial conversion rate of 57.8503 common shares per $1,000 note outstanding. The potential convertible shares are not included in our total common shares and convertible limited partnership units outstanding at September 30, 2010. |
Section
VII - Net Asset Value
Page 7.4
Page 7.4
Third Quarter 2010 |
Appendix
A Notes to Supplemental Information
Please refer to our annual and quarterly
financial statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Forms 10-K and 10-Q for further information about us and our business.
Certain amounts from previous periods presented in this Supplemental Information
have been reclassified to conform to the 2010 presentation. Please also read the Definitions included in Appendix B.
Notes to Section II- Financial Statements
Our direct owned segment represents the direct, long-term ownership of industrial properties. Our
investment strategy in this segment focuses primarily on the ownership and leasing of industrial
properties in key distribution markets. We consider these properties to be our Core Portfolio. Also
included in this segment are operating properties we developed that we refer to as Completed
Development Properties. Our intent is to hold and use the Core and Development properties, however,
depending on market and other conditions, we may contribute either Core or Development properties
to the property funds or sell to third parties. When we contribute or sell Development properties,
we recognize FFO to the extent the proceeds received exceed our original investment (i.e. prior to
depreciation) and present the results as Net Gains on Dispositions. In addition, we have industrial
properties that are currently under development and land available for development that are part of
this segment as well. We may develop the land or sell to third parties, depending on market and
other conditions. The investment management segment represents the investment management of
unconsolidated property funds and joint ventures and the properties they own.
(1) | On October 18, 2010, we announced that we had entered into a definitive agreement to sell a portfolio of industrial properties and several equity method investments to a single buyer for approximately $1.02 billion. The industrial portfolio includes approximately 180 properties with 23 million square feet that were 95.6% leased at September 30, 2010 and had net operating income of approximately $19.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The equity method investments include our 20% ownership interest in three property funds (ProLogis North American Properties Fund VI-VIII) and an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture that owns a hotel property and adjacent land. We expect the sale, which is subject to customary closing conditions, to close later in the fourth quarter and result in an approximate $200 million net gain for GAAP earnings purposes. We will continue to provide property management services for the industrial properties that were previously owned directly by us and by the property funds. | |
(2) | During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, in connection with our announced initiatives to stagger and extend our debt maturities and reduce debt, we repurchased portions of several series of senior and convertible senior notes outstanding with maturities in 2012, 2013, 2015 and 2016. In addition, in the first and third quarters of 2010, we repaid certain secured mortgage debt in connection with the sale of two properties in Japan. The repurchase activity is summarized as follows (in thousands): |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Convertible Senior Notes (a): |
||||||||||||||||
Original principal amount |
$ | 103,000 | $ | 15,000 | $ | 842,642 | $ | 536,257 | ||||||||
Cash purchase price |
$ | 97,181 | $ | 13,028 | $ | 791,603 | $ | 351,106 | ||||||||
Senior Notes: |
||||||||||||||||
Original principal amount |
$ | 33,539 | $ | 20,000 | $ | 456,015 | $ | 363,192 | ||||||||
Cash purchase price |
$ | 33,102 | $ | 19,925 | $ | 482,484 | $ | 322,015 | ||||||||
Secured Mortgage Debt: |
||||||||||||||||
Original principal amount |
$ | 89,581 | $ | 227,017 | $ | 134,721 | $ | 227,017 | ||||||||
Cash repayment price |
$ | 90,402 | $ | 227,017 | $ | 137,061 | $ | 227,017 | ||||||||
Total: |
||||||||||||||||
Original principal amount |
$ | 226,120 | $ | 262,017 | $ | 1,433,378 | $ | 1,126,466 | ||||||||
Cash purchase / repayment price |
$ | 220,685 | $ | 259,970 | $ | 1,411,148 | $ | 900,138 | ||||||||
Gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt, net (b) |
$ | (1,791 | ) | $ | 12,010 | $ | (48,449 | ) | $ | 173,218 |
(a) | Although the cash purchase price is less than the principal amount outstanding, the repurchase of these notes resulted in a non-cash loss in 2010 due to the non-cash discount. Therefore, we adjusted for this non-cash loss to arrive at FFO, excluding significant non-cash items. | |
(b) | Represents the difference between the recorded debt (including unamortized related debt issuance costs, premiums and discounts) and the consideration we paid to retire the debt. Of the loss referred to above, the non-cash loss of $1.8 million and $16.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, are adjusted back to arrive at FFO, excluding significant non-cash items. |
(3) | In our Consolidated Statements of Operations, rental income includes the following (in thousands): |
Appendix A
Page - 1 -
Page - 1 -
Third Quarter 2010 |
Appendix A
- Notes to Supplemental Information
Notes to Section II- Financial Statements (continued)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 177,012 | $ | 165,385 | $ | 513,023 | $ | 487,443 | ||||||||
Rental expense recoveries |
50,169 | 47,278 | 152,418 | 147,522 | ||||||||||||
Straight-lined rents |
8,887 | 7,826 | 30,375 | 26,287 | ||||||||||||
$ | 236,068 | $ | 220,489 | $ | 695,816 | $ | 661,252 | |||||||||
(4) | On February 9, 2009, we sold our operations in China and our property fund interests in Japan to affiliates of GIC Real Estate, the real estate investment company of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation, for total cash consideration of $1.3 billion ($845 million related to China and $500 million related to the Japan investments). |
In connection with the sale of our investments in the Japan property funds, we recognized a gain of $180.2 million. The gain is reflected as CDFS Proceeds in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and FFO, as it represents previously deferred gains on the contribution of development properties to the property funds based on our ownership interest in the property funds at the time of original contribution. We also recognized $20.5 million in current income tax expense related to the Japan portion of the transaction. We continued to manage the Japan properties until July 2009 at which time we earned a termination fee of $16.3 million that is included in Property Management and Other Fees and Incentives in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and FFO. |
(5) | In the fourth quarter of 2008, in response to the difficult economic climate, we initiated general and administrative expense (G&A) reductions. These initiatives included a Reduction in Workforce (RIF) program and reductions to other expenses through various cost savings measures. Lower gross G&A and less development activity has resulted in lower capitalized G&A. Our G&A included in our Statements of Operations consisted of the following (in thousands): |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Gross G&A expense |
$ | 59,795 | $ | 65,060 | $ | 190,529 | $ | 212,221 | ||||||||
Reported as rental expense |
(4,988 | ) | (4,872 | ) | (14,822 | ) | (14,660 | ) | ||||||||
Reported as investment management expenses |
(9,829 | ) | (10,186 | ) | (30,079 | ) | (31,581 | ) | ||||||||
Capitalized amounts |
(10,019 | ) | (11,370 | ) | (29,742 | ) | (37,655 | ) | ||||||||
Net G&A |
$ | 34,959 | $ | 38,632 | $ | 115,886 | $ | 128,325 | ||||||||
(6) | The following table presents the components of Interest Expense as reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands): |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Gross interest expense |
$ | 114,291 | $ | 91,349 | $ | 332,525 | $ | 281,585 | ||||||||
Amortization of discount, net |
10,880 | 15,706 | 38,412 | 51,049 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred loan costs |
6,110 | 4,941 | 20,027 | 11,191 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense before capitalization |
131,281 | 111,996 | 390,964 | 343,825 | ||||||||||||
Capitalized amounts |
(11,048 | ) | (22,158 | ) | (41,832 | ) | (78,006 | ) | ||||||||
Net interest expense |
$ | 120,233 | $ | 89,838 | $ | 349,132 | $ | 265,819 | ||||||||
Gross interest expense increased in 2010 from 2009 due to increased borrowing rates. The decrease in capitalized amounts in 2010 from 2009 is due to less development activity. |
(7) | Included in Net Gains on Dispositions of Real Estate Properties for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 are gains of $6.5 million and $7.6 million, respectively, from the sale of real estate properties that were previously impaired. |
Appendix A
Page -2-
Page -2-
Third Quarter 2010 |
Appendix A
- Notes to Supplemental Information
Notes to Section II - Financial Statements (continued)
(8) | Included in Foreign Currency Exchange Gains (Losses), Net, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, are net foreign currency exchange gains or losses from the remeasurement of inter-company loans between the U.S. and our consolidated subsidiaries in Japan and Europe due to the fluctuations in the exchange rates of U.S. dollars to the yen, the euro and pound sterling between January 1st and September 30th of the applicable years. We do not include the gains and losses related to inter-company loans in our calculation of FFO. | |
(9) | The operations of the properties held for sale and properties that are disposed of to third parties during a period, including the aggregate net gains recognized upon their disposition, are presented as discontinued operations in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for all periods presented. | |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we disposed of 13 properties to third parties aggregating 1.4 million square feet, 2 of which were development properties. During all of 2009, other than our China operations, we disposed of land subject to ground leases and 140 properties aggregating 14.8 million square feet to third parties, 3 of which were development properties. | ||
The income attributable to these properties and our China operations was as follows (in thousands): |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 184 | $ | 4,737 | $ | 1,603 | $ | 50,429 | ||||||||
Rental expenses |
(231 | ) | (1,012 | ) | (875 | ) | (14,903 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(83 | ) | (950 | ) | (336 | ) | (11,534 | ) | ||||||||
Other expenses, net |
- | - | - | (576 | ) | |||||||||||
Income (loss) attributable to disposed properties |
$ | (130 | ) | $ | 2,775 | $ | 392 | $ | 23,416 | |||||||
For purposes of our Consolidated Statements of FFO, we do not segregate discontinued operations. In addition, we include the gains from disposition of land parcels and Completed Development Properties in the calculation of FFO, including those classified as discontinued operations. | ||
(10) | The net gains on dispositions of real estate properties presented in our Consolidated Statements of FFO are net of related taxes of $2.0 million and $2.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. |
Notes to Section IV - Investment Management
(1) | Included in North American funds are 10 property funds. As of January 1, 2010, we are excluding two North American funds from the Supplemental Package (see page 4.2). We contributed one property to ProLogis North American Industrial Fund during the first quarter of 2010. | |
(2) | The European funds include PEPR and PEPF II. We contributed five completed development properties in the third quarter of 2010 and one completed development property and 41 acres of land to PEPF II during the second quarter of 2010. | |
(3) | Represents the ProLogis Korea Fund. | |
(4) | Certain property funds in North America and Europe have interest rate swap contracts that were designated as cash flow hedges to mitigate the volatility in interest rates that no longer met the requirements for hedge accounting. The changes in the fair value of these contracts are recorded through earnings. When these interest rate swap contracts are settled, the realized gain or loss is recorded in interest expense and included in our calculation of FFO. There was no activity for derivatives included in FFO for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and our share of losses for the three months ended September 30, 2009 were $3.0 million. Our share of realized losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were $6.0 million and $13.9 million, respectively. | |
(5) | Included in our share of the property funds net earnings are items that are necessary to adjust for differences between our investment and the property funds basis in certain items, primarily arising due to deferred gains and fees that were not recognized when earned by us due to our ownership interest in the property fund. In our Consolidated Statements of FFO, deferred gains and fees are only recognized when the underlying property is sold to a third party by the property fund and are reflected as Net Gains on Dispositions of Real Estate Properties. | |
(6) | Represents interest income earned from notes receivables, if any, from the property funds, along with dividend income earned from our investment in PEPRs preferred units. | |
(7) | In addition to the property and asset management fees earned by us and expensed by the property funds, we earn other fees for leasing, construction, development, financing and other activities performed on behalf of the property funds. Certain of these fees are capitalized by the property funds (primarily leasing, construction, development and financing fees). We defer an amount of these types of fees we earn in an amount proportionate to our ownership interest in the property fund. The deferred fees are recognized in income in future periods by reducing depreciation or interest expense (related to the capitalized fees) when we recognize our share of the earnings or losses of the property fund under the equity method see note (5). |
Appendix A
Page -3-
Page -3-
Third Quarter 2010 |
Appendix A
- Notes to Supplemental Information
Notes to Section II - Financial Statements (continued)
In addition, in 2010, we are developing a building for PEPF II for which we will earn fees. We record these fees in Development Management and Other Income in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and FFO. | ||
(8) | Includes only those fees earned from the property funds in which we have ownership interests that are accounted for by the equity method. In addition, we earn fees from the management of properties owned by certain joint ventures. |
Appendix A
Page -4-
Page -4-
Third Quarter 2010 |
Appendix B - Definitions
Core - Completed Development Portfolio Includes industrial operating properties we
developed.
Core Portfolio Includes all industrial operating properties that we own directly, excluding the
completed development portfolio.
Debt Covenants
Credit Facility On June 30, 2010, we amended our facility (the Global Line) to reduce the size of the aggregate commitments to $2.25 billion (subject to currency fluctuations), by eliminating the Korea won and Canadian dollar tranches and reducing the Euro and Yen tranches. In addition to reducing the commitments, among other amended items, we eliminated the borrowing base covenant and replaced it with a debt yield covenant that requires us to maintain a ratio of net operating income from certain unencumbered properties to certain specified debt, as of the last day of each fiscal quarter. |
We may draw funds from a syndicate of banks in U.S. dollars, euros, Japanese yen, British pound sterling and Canadian dollars under the U.S. tranche. Based on our public debt ratings and a pricing grid, interest on the borrowings under the Global Line accrues at a variable rate based upon the interbank offered rate in each respective jurisdiction in which the borrowings are outstanding (2.55% per annum at September 30, 2010 based on a weighted average using local currency rates). The facility matures on August 12, 2012. |
The covenants are calculated based on the definitions as defined within the Global Line agreement and may be different than similar terms in our Consolidated Financial Statements as provided in our Forms 10-K and 10-Q or with the covenants under the Indenture for our Senior Notes below. As of September 30, 2010, we were in compliance with all of our covenants under this agreement. |
Senior Notes We have approximately $6.3 billion of senior notes outstanding as of September 30, 2010, that have been issued under the 1995 indenture (Original Indenture) or supplemental indentures. We refer to the Original Indenture, as amended by supplemental indentures, collectively as the Indenture. All senior notes, other than the convertible senior notes, issued under the Indenture are subject to one consistent set of financial covenants, defined terms and thresholds for certain events of default. |
The covenants are calculated based on the definitions as defined within the Indenture and may be different than similar terms in our Consolidated Financial Statements as provided in our Forms 10-K and 10-Q or with the covenants under our Global Line above. As of September 30, 2010, we were in compliance with all applicable covenants. |
FFO, FFO including significant non-cash items, FFO excluding significant non-cash items
(collectively referred to as FFO) FFO is a non-GAAP measure that is commonly used in the
real estate industry. The most directly comparable GAAP measure to FFO is net earnings.
Although National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) has published a definition of FFO, modifications to the NAREIT calculation of
FFO are common among REITs, as companies seek to provide financial measures that meaningfully
reflect their business.
FFO is not meant to represent a comprehensive system of financial reporting and does not present, nor do we intend it to present, a complete picture of our financial condition and operating performance. We believe net earnings computed under GAAP remains the primary measure of performance and that FFO is only meaningful when it is used in conjunction with net earnings computed under GAAP. Further, we believe our consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with GAAP, provide the most meaningful picture of our financial condition and our operating performance. |
NAREITs FFO measure adjusts net earnings computed under GAAP to exclude historical cost depreciation and gains and losses from the sales of previously depreciated properties. We agree that these two NAREIT adjustments are useful to investors for the following reasons: |
(i) | historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP assumes, through depreciation charges, that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. NAREIT stated in its White Paper on FFO since real estate asset values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors have considered presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. Consequently, NAREITs definition of FFO reflects the fact that real estate, as an asset class, generally appreciates over time and depreciation charges required by GAAP do not reflect the underlying economic realities. | ||
(ii) | REITs were created as a legal form of organization in order to encourage public ownership of real estate as an asset class through investment in firms that were in the business of long-term ownership and management of real estate. The exclusion, in NAREITs definition of FFO, of gains and losses from the sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets allows investors and analysts to readily identify the operating results of the long-term assets that form the core of a REITs activity and assists in comparing those operating results between periods. We include the gains and losses from dispositions of land, development properties and properties acquired in our CDFS business segment, as well as our proportionate share of the gains and losses from dispositions recognized by the property funds, in our definition of FFO. |
Our FFO Measures |
At the same time that NAREIT created and defined its FFO measure for the REIT industry, it also recognized that management of each of its member companies has the responsibility and authority to publish financial information that it regards as useful to the financial community. We believe shareholders, potential investors and financial analysts who review our operating results are best served by a defined FFO measure that includes other adjustments to net earnings computed under GAAP in addition to those included in the NAREIT defined measure of FFO. Our FFO measures are used by management in analyzing our business and the performance of our properties and we believe that it is important that shareholders, potential investors and financial analysts understand the measures management uses. |
We use our FFO measures as supplemental financial measures of operating performance. We do not use our FFO measures as, nor should they be considered to be, alternatives to net earnings computed under GAAP, as indicators of our operating performance, as alternatives to cash from operating activities computed under GAAP or as indicators of our ability to fund our cash needs. |
Appendix B
Page - 1 -
Page - 1 -
Third Quarter 2010 |
Appendix B - Definitions
FFO, including significant non-cash items |
To arrive at FFO, including significant non-cash items, we adjust the NAREIT defined FFO measure to exclude: |
(i) | deferred income tax benefits and deferred income tax expenses recognized by our subsidiaries; | ||
(ii) | current income tax expense related to acquired tax liabilities that were recorded as deferred tax liabilities in an acquisition, to the extent the expense is offset with a deferred income tax benefit in GAAP earnings that is excluded from our defined FFO measure; | ||
(iii) | certain foreign currency exchange gains and losses resulting from certain debt transactions between us and our foreign consolidated subsidiaries and our foreign unconsolidated investees; | ||
(iv) | foreign currency exchange gains and losses from the remeasurement (based on current foreign currency exchange rates) of certain third party debt of our foreign consolidated subsidiaries and our foreign unconsolidated investees; and | ||
(v) | mark-to-market adjustments associated with derivative financial instruments utilized to manage foreign currency and interest rate risks. |
We calculate FFO, including significant non-cash items for our unconsolidated investees on the same basis as we calculate our FFO, including significant non-cash items. |
We use this FFO measure, including by segment and region, to: (i) evaluate our performance and the performance of our properties in comparison to expected results and results of previous periods, relative to resource allocation decisions; (ii) evaluate the performance of our management; (iii) budget and forecast future results to assist in the allocation of resources; (iv) assess our performance as compared to similar real estate companies and the industry in general; and (v) evaluate how a specific potential investment will impact our future results. Because we make decisions with regard to our performance with a long-term outlook, we believe it is appropriate to remove the effects of short-term items that we do not expect to affect the underlying long-term performance of the properties. The long-term performance of our properties is principally driven by rental income. While not infrequent or unusual, these additional items we exclude in calculating FFO, including significant non-cash items, are subject to significant fluctuations from period to period that cause both positive and negative short-term effects on our results of operations, in inconsistent and unpredictable directions that are not relevant to our long-term outlook. |
We believe investors are best served if the information that is made available to them allows them to align their analysis and evaluation of our operating results along the same lines that our management uses in planning and executing our business strategy. |
FFO, excluding significant non-cash items |
When we began to experience the effects of the global economic crises in the fourth quarter of 2008, we decided that FFO, including significant non-cash items, did not provide all of the information we needed to evaluate our business in this environment. As a result, we developed FFO, excluding significant non-cash items to provide additional information that allows us to better evaluate our operating performance in this unprecedented economic time. |
To arrive at FFO, excluding significant non-cash items, we adjust FFO, including significant non-cash items, to exclude the following items that we recognized directly or our share recognized by our unconsolidated investees: |
Non-recurring items |
(i) | impairment charges related to the sale of our China operations; | ||
(ii) | impairment charges of goodwill; and | ||
(iii) | our share of the losses recognized by PEPR on the sale of its investment in PEPF II. |
Recurring items |
(i) | impairment charges of completed development properties that we contributed or expect to contribute to a property fund; | ||
(ii) | impairment charges of land or other real estate properties that we sold or expect to sell; | ||
(iii) | impairment charges of other non-real estate assets, including equity investments; | ||
(iv) | our share of impairment charges of real estate that is sold or expected to be sold by an unconsolidated investee; and | ||
(v) | gains or losses from the early extinguishment of debt. |
We believe that these items, both recurring and non-recurring, are driven by factors relating to the fundamental disruption in the global financial and real estate markets, rather than factors specific to the company or the performance of our properties or investments. |
The impairment charges of real estate properties that we have recognized were primarily based on valuations of real estate, which had declined due to market conditions, that we no longer expected to hold for long-term investment. In order to generate liquidity, we decided to sell our China operations in the fourth quarter of 2008 at a loss and, therefore, we recognized an impairment charge. Also, to generate liquidity, we have contributed or intend to contribute certain completed properties to property funds and sold or intend to sell certain land parcels or properties to third parties. To the extent these properties are expected to be sold at a loss, we record an impairment charge when the loss is known. The impairment charges related to goodwill and other assets that we have recognized were similarly caused by the decline in the real estate markets. |
Certain of our unconsolidated investees have recognized and may continue to recognize similar impairment charges of real estate that they expect to sell, which impacts our equity in earnings of such investees. |
In connection with our announced initiatives to reduce debt and extend debt maturities, we have purchased portions of our debt securities. As a result, we recognized net gains or losses on the early extinguishment of certain debt. Certain of our unconsolidated investees have recognized or may recognize similar gains or losses, which impacts our equity in earnings of such investees. |
Appendix B
Page - 2 -
Page - 2 -
Third Quarter 2010 |
Appendix B - Definitions
During this turbulent time, we have recognized certain of these recurring charges and gains over several quarters since the fourth quarter of 2008 and we believe it is reasonably likely that we may recognize similar charges and gains in the near future. As we continue to focus on generating liquidity, we believe it is likely that we may recognize additional impairment charges of assets that we or our unconsolidated investees will sell in the near future. We believe that as the economy stabilizes, our liquidity needs change and the remaining capital available to the existing unconsolidated property funds to acquire our completed development properties expires (existing capital commitments expired in August of 2010), the potential for impairment charges on real estate properties will diminish to an immaterial amount. As we continue to monetize our land bank through development or dispositions, we may dispose of this land at a gain or loss. We may also dispose of other non-strategic assets at a gain or loss. However, we do not expect that we will adjust our FFO measure for these gains or losses after 2010. |
We analyze our operating performance primarily by the rental income of our real estate, net of operating, administrative and financing expenses, which is not directly impacted by short-term fluctuations in the market value of our real estate or debt securities. As a result, although these significant non-cash items have had a material impact on our operations and are reflected in our financial statements, the removal of the effects of these items allows us to better understand the core operating performance of our properties over the long-term. |
As described above, we began using FFO, excluding significant non-cash items, including by segment and region, to: (i) evaluate our performance and the performance of our properties in comparison to expected results and results of previous periods, relative to resource allocation decisions; (ii) evaluate the performance of our management; (iii) budget and forecast future results to assist in the allocation of resources; (iv) assess our performance as compared to similar real estate companies and the industry in general; and (v) evaluate how a specific potential investment will impact our future results. Because we make decisions with regard to our performance with a long-term outlook, we believe it is appropriate to remove the effects of short-term items that we do not expect to affect the underlying long-term performance of the properties we own. As noted above, we believe the long-term performance of our properties is principally driven by rental income. We believe investors are best served if the information that is made available to them allows them to align their analysis and evaluation of our operating results along the same lines that our management uses in planning and executing our business strategy. |
As the impact of these recurring items dissipates, we expect that the usefulness of FFO, excluding significant non-cash items will similarly dissipate and we will go back to using only FFO, including significant non-cash items. |
Limitations on Use of our FFO Measures |
While we believe our defined FFO measures are important supplemental measures, neither NAREITs nor our measures of FFO should be used alone because they exclude significant economic components of net earnings computed under GAAP and are, therefore, limited as an analytical tool. Accordingly they are two of many measures we use when analyzing our business. Some of these limitations are: |
| The current income tax expenses that are excluded from our defined FFO measures represent the taxes that are payable. | ||
| Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets are economic costs that are excluded from FFO. FFO is limited, as it does not reflect the cash requirements that may be necessary for future replacements of the real estate assets. Further, the amortization of capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of industrial properties are not reflected in FFO. | ||
| Gains or losses from property dispositions represent changes in the value of the disposed properties. By excluding these gains and losses, FFO does not capture realized changes in the value of disposed properties arising from changes in market conditions. | ||
| The deferred income tax benefits and expenses that are excluded from our defined FFO measures result from the creation of a deferred income tax asset or liability that may have to be settled at some future point. Our defined FFO measures do not currently reflect any income or expense that may result from such settlement. | ||
| The foreign currency exchange gains and losses that are excluded from our defined FFO measures are generally recognized based on movements in foreign currency exchange rates through a specific point in time. The ultimate settlement of our foreign currency-denominated net assets is indefinite as to timing and amount. Our FFO measures are limited in that they do not reflect the current period changes in these net assets that result from periodic foreign currency exchange rate movements. | ||
| The non-cash impairment charges that we exclude from our FFO, excluding significant non-cash items, have been or may be realized as a loss in the future upon the ultimate disposition of the related real estate properties or other assets through the form of lower cash proceeds. | ||
| The gains on extinguishment of debt that we exclude from our FFO, excluding significant non-cash items, provides a benefit to us as we are settling our debt at less than our future obligation. |
We compensate for these limitations by using our FFO measures only in conjunction with net earnings computed under GAAP when making our decisions. To assist investors in compensating for these limitations, we reconcile our defined FFO measures to our net earnings computed under GAAP. This information should be read with our complete financial statements prepared under GAAP and the rest of the disclosures we file with the SEC to fully understand our FFO measures and the limitations on its use. |
Net Asset Value We consider Net Asset Value to be a useful tool to estimate the fair value of
common shareholder equity. The assessment of the fair value of a particular segment of our
business is subjective in that it involves estimates and can be performed using various
methods. Therefore, in this Supplemental Report, we have presented the financial results and
investments related to our business segments that we believe are important in calculating our
Net Asset Value but have not presented any specific methodology nor provided any guidance on
the assumptions or estimates that should be used in the calculation.
Operating Segments:
Direct Owned Segment represents the direct long-term ownership of industrial properties, including development of properties. |
Investment Management Segment represents the investment management of unconsolidated property funds and joint ventures and the properties they own. |
Same Store We evaluate the operating performance of the operating properties we own and manage
using a same store analysis because the population of properties in this analysis is
consistent from period to period, thereby eliminating the effects of changes in the
composition of the portfolio on performance
Appendix B
Page - 3 -
Page - 3 -
Third Quarter 2010 |
Appendix B - Definitions
measures. We include properties owned by us, and properties owned by the industrial property funds and joint ventures that are managed by us (referred to as unconsolidated investees), in our same store analysis. We have defined the same store portfolio, for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as those operating properties that were in operation at July 1, 2009 and have been in operation throughout the full periods in both 2010 and 2009. We have removed all properties that were disposed of to a third party from the population for both periods. We believe the factors that impact rental income, rental expenses and net operating income in the same store portfolio are generally the same as for the total portfolio. In order to derive an appropriate measure of period-to-period operating performance, we remove the effects of foreign currency exchange rate movements by using the current exchange rate to translate from local currency into U.S. dollars, for both periods, to derive the same store results. |
Same store rental income includes the amount of rental expenses that are recovered from customers under the terms of their respective lease agreements. In computing the percentage change in rental income for the same store analysis, rental income is adjusted to remove the net termination fees recognized for each period. Net termination fees generally represent the gross fee negotiated at the time a customer is allowed to terminate its lease agreement offset by the customers rent leveling asset that was previously recognized. Removing the net termination fees for the same store calculation allows us to evaluate the growth or decline in each propertys rental income without regard to items that are not indicative of the propertys recurring operating performance. Customer terminations are negotiated under specific circumstances and are not subject to specific provisions or rights allowed under the lease agreements. |
Same store rental expense represent gross property operating expenses. In computing the percentage change in rental expenses for the same store analysis, rental expenses include property management expenses for our direct owned properties based on the property management fee that has been computed as provided in the individual agreements under which our wholly owned management company provides property management services to each property (generally the fee is based on a percentage of revenues). |
Same store average leasing represents the change in the average leased percentage for all periods presented. |
Same store rental rate growth represents the change in effective rental rates, on new leases signed during the period, as compared with the previous effective rental rates in that same space. |
Turnover
costs Represents the square feet and associated costs expected to be incurred i) to
prepare a space for a new tenant, except for space that is being leased for the first time
(i.e., in a new development property); ii) for a lease renewal with the same tenant; and iii)
for space in properties acquired, if the space was vacant at the date of acquisition. The
amount provided represents the total turnover costs expected to be incurred on the leases
signed during the period and does not represent actual turnover expenditures for the period.
Appendix B
Page - 4 -
Page - 4 -