Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
8-K - FORM 8-K - Prologis, Inc. | f57090e8vk.htm |
Exhibit 99.1
Company Profile |
2010 Third Quarter Earnings
Conference Call |
|||
AMB Property Corporation® is a leading owner, operator and developer of industrial
real estate, focused on major hub and gateway distribution markets in the Americas, Europe and
Asia. As of September 30, 2010, AMB owned or had investments in, on a consolidated basis or through
unconsolidated joint ventures, properties and development projects expected to total approximately
158.4 million square feet (14.7 million square meters) in 49 markets within 15 countries.
AMB invests in properties located predominantly in the infill submarkets of its targeted markets.
AMBs portfolio is comprised primarily of High Throughput Distribution® facilities built
for efficiency and located near airports, seaports, ground transportation systems, and population
concentrations.
Through its private capital group, AMB provides real estate investment, portfolio management and
reporting services to co-investment ventures and clients. Private capital revenue consists of asset
management distributions and fees, acquisition and development fees as well as incentive
distributions.
The Americas |
Europe |
Asia |
||||||||
Operating Portfolio(1)
|
123.2 msf | Operating Portfolio(1) | 11.8 msf | Operating Portfolio(1) | 13.5 msf | |||||
Development
Portfolio(2)(3) |
4.4 msf | Development Portfolio(2)(3) | 2.4 msf | Development Portfolio(2)(3) | 3.1 msf | |||||
Land Inventory(3)
|
2,306 acres | Land Inventory(3) | 227 acres | Land Inventory(3) | 130 acres | |||||
1) | The operating portfolio includes the owned and managed portfolio and operating properties held through AMBs investments in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage (excluded from the owned and managed portfolio), value-added acquisitions and the location of AMBs global headquarters. | |
2) | Includes pre-stabilized development properties. | |
3) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated joint ventures. |
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 1
Highlights (dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
For the Quarters Ended September 30, | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 158,696 | $ | 153,567 | 3.3 | % | $ | 468,988 | $ | 460,265 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA(1) |
107,955 | 151,238 | (28.6 | %) | 316,055 | 397,130 | (20.4 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders |
6,635 | 62,790 | (89.4 | %) | 5,090 | (42,513 | ) | 112.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
FFO, as adjusted(1)(2) |
54,998 | 106,531 | (48.4 | %) | 154,193 | 240,685 | (35.9 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Per diluted share and unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
EPS |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.43 | (90.7 | %) | $ | 0.03 | $ | (0.33 | ) | 109.1 | % | |||||||||||
FFO, as adjusted(1)(2) |
0.32 | 0.71 | (54.9 | %) | 0.94 | 1.80 | (47.8 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends per common share |
0.28 | 0.28 | 0.0 | % | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.0 | % |
Financial(3) |
Completed $1.4 billion in capital markets transactions
Approximately $1.7 billion in liquidity; consisting of approximately $1.5 billion of availability on lines of credit and more than $200 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
Operations(3) |
92.6% occupancy at the end of the third quarter; 91.7% average occupancy
Third quarter cash-basis same store NOI(1) decrease of 3.0%
70.2% third quarter tenant retention; 67.1% for the trailing four quarters
Commenced 8.1 msf of leases in the third quarter
|
|
Capital Deployment(3) |
Leased 1.7 msf in the development portfolio; approximately 2.5 msf
remaining to stabilize the static 12/31/09 development portfolio
Completed $39.4 million in dispositions in the third quarter; $97.3 million of contributions and dispositions year-to-date
Acquired five properties(4) totaling approximately $110.9 million in the third quarter, $199.1 million year-to-date
Acquired first 86-acre land parcel in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, the third acquisition with our joint venture partner, CCP |
|
Private Capital |
Formed AMB Mexico Fondo Logistico, the first of its kind industrial venture for Mexican pension plans (AFORES), raised third-party capital of $3.3 billion
pesos (USD $242.7 million) and committed USD $60.7 million for total equity of USD $303.4 million for future investment
$95.1 million in new third-party equity commitments, comprised of $50.5 million in AMB U.S. Logistics Fund and $44.6 million in AMB Europe Fund I
Subsequent to quarter end, $100 million of new equity investments by AMB, comprised of $50 million in AMB U.S. Logistics Fund and $50 million in AMB
Europe Fund I
|
|
(1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(2) | See page 5 for a reconciliation to derive FFO, as adjusted. | |
(3) | Owned and managed portfolio. | |
(4) | Includes value-added acquisitions. |
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 2
Overview of Funds From Operations, as adjusted(1) |
2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
Funds From Operations, as adjusted(1)(2)(4)
(per diluted common share and unit)
(per diluted common share and unit)
Estimated FFO, as adjusted by Business(1)(4)
(per diluted common share and unit)
(per diluted common share and unit)
For the Years Ended December 31, | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||
Real estate operations,
net of unallocated overhead |
$ | 1.53 | $ | 1.19 | $ | 0.79 | ||||||
Overhead reallocation |
0.46 | 0.32 | 0.21 | |||||||||
Real estate operations FFO,
as adjusted |
$ | 1.99 | $ | 1.51 | $ | 1.00 | ||||||
% of reported FFO, as adjusted |
68.6 | % | 72.2 | % | 106.4 | % | ||||||
Development Gains |
0.72 | 0.63 | 0.02 | |||||||||
Overhead allocation |
(0.33 | ) | (0.21 | ) | (0.14 | ) | ||||||
Development FFO, as adjusted |
$ | 0.39 | $ | 0.42 | $ | (0.12 | ) | |||||
% of reported FFO, as adjusted |
13.5 | % | 20.1 | % | (12.8 | %) | ||||||
Private Capital Revenues |
0.65 | 0.27 | 0.13 | |||||||||
Overhead allocation |
(0.13 | ) | (0.11 | ) | (0.07 | ) | ||||||
Private Capital FFO, as adjusted |
$ | 0.52 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.06 | ||||||
% of reported FFO, as adjusted |
17.9 | % | 7.7 | % | 6.4 | % | ||||||
Total FFO, as adjusted |
$ | 2.90 | $ | 2.09 | $ | 0.94 | ||||||
Development Profits(1)(3)
(per diluted common share and unit)
(per diluted common share and unit)
Private Capital Revenue
(per diluted common share and unit)
(per diluted common share and unit)
(1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(2) | For a reconciliation of FFO, as adjusted from net income for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, please refer to AMBs Supplemental Analyst Package for the fourth quarter of 2009. As a reconciliation of FFO, as adjusted from FFO for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 as presented in AMBs Supplemental Analyst Package for the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company has made adjusting increases of $0.3 million for loss on early extinguishment of debt in 2007 and increases of $2.9 million and $1.1 million for preferred unit redemption premiums in 2007 and 2006, respectively. | |
(3) | Excludes co-investment venture partners share of development gains. | |
(4) | See page 5 for a reconciliation to derive FFO, as adjusted. | |
(5) | Management revenues consist of asset management distributions or fees, acquisition fees for third party acquisitions and priority distributions, as well as market compensation for development and other services. |
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 3
Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands, except per share data) |
2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
For the Quarters Ended September 30, | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Rental revenues |
$ | 151,127 | $ | 145,681 | $ | 447,129 | $ | 432,889 | ||||||||
Private capital revenues |
7,569 | 7,886 | 21,859 | 27,376 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
158,696 | 153,567 | 468,988 | 460,265 | ||||||||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Property operating costs |
(46,803 | ) | (45,146 | ) | (142,480 | ) | (135,100 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(50,590 | ) | (45,975 | ) | (145,437 | ) | (124,808 | ) | ||||||||
General and administrative |
(28,715 | ) | (27,169 | ) | (90,758 | ) | (84,123 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring charges |
(1,029 | ) | | (4,874 | ) | (3,824 | ) | |||||||||
Fund costs |
(146 | ) | (240 | ) | (613 | ) | (824 | ) | ||||||||
Real estate impairment losses |
| | | (172,059 | ) | |||||||||||
Other expenses(1) |
(1,330 | ) | (3,049 | ) | (1,251 | ) | (6,593 | ) | ||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
(128,613 | ) | (121,579 | ) | (385,413 | ) | (527,331 | ) | ||||||||
Other income and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Development profits, net of taxes |
717 | 1,220 | 5,719 | 34,506 | ||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures, net |
3,348 | 3,257 | 12,416 | 7,507 | ||||||||||||
Other income(1) |
1,299 | 3,452 | 2,035 | 3,911 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
(32,125 | ) | (27,498 | ) | (97,364 | ) | (88,216 | ) | ||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
(1,967 | ) | | (2,546 | ) | (657 | ) | |||||||||
Total other income and expenses, net |
(28,728 | ) | (19,569 | ) | (79,740 | ) | (42,949 | ) | ||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
1,355 | 12,419 | 3,835 | (110,015 | ) | |||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
||||||||||||||||
Income attributable to discontinued operations |
742 | 2,609 | 2,707 | 2,017 | ||||||||||||
Development profits, net of taxes |
| 53,002 | | 53,002 | ||||||||||||
Gains from sale of real estate interests, net of taxes |
11,495 | 8,434 | 15,743 | 37,138 | ||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
12,237 | 64,045 | 18,450 | 92,157 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
13,592 | 76,464 | 22,285 | (17,858 | ) | |||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests share of net income (loss) |
||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners share of net income |
(2,527 | ) | (6,058 | ) | (4,220 | ) | (8,829 | ) | ||||||||
Joint venture partners and limited partnership unitholders share of development profits |
(6 | ) | (1,388 | ) | (93 | ) | (2,445 | ) | ||||||||
Preferred unitholders |
| (1,431 | ) | | (4,295 | ) | ||||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders |
(132 | ) | (447 | ) | (5 | ) | 3,543 | |||||||||
Total noncontrolling interests share of net income (loss) |
(2,665 | ) | (9,324 | ) | (4,318 | ) | (12,026 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to AMB Property Corporation |
10,927 | 67,140 | 17,967 | (29,884 | ) | |||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(3,952 | ) | (3,952 | ) | (11,856 | ) | (11,856 | ) | ||||||||
Allocation to participating securities(2) |
(340 | ) | (398 | ) | (1,021 | ) | (773 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders |
$ | 6,635 | $ | 62,790 | $ | 5,090 | $ | (42,513 | ) | |||||||
Net income (loss) per common share (diluted) |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.03 | $ | (0.33 | ) | |||||||
Weighted average common shares (diluted) |
166,997 | 145,659 | 160,187 | 129,860 | ||||||||||||
(1) | Includes changes in liabilities and assets associated with AMBs deferred compensation plan for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 of $1,086 and $391, respectively. | |
(2) | Represents net income attributable to AMB Property Corporation, net of preferred stock dividends, allocated to outstanding unvested restricted shares. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, there were 1,216 unvested restricted shares outstanding. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, there were 920 unvested restricted shares outstanding. |
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 4
Consolidated Statements of Funds from Operations, as adjusted(1) (in thousands, except per share data) |
2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
For the Quarters Ended September 30, | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders |
$ | 6,635 | $ | 62,790 | $ | 5,090 | $ | (42,513 | ) | |||||||
Gains from sale or contribution of real estate interests, net of taxes |
(11,495 | ) | (8,434 | ) | (15,743 | ) | (37,138 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
||||||||||||||||
Total depreciation and amortization |
50,590 | 45,975 | 145,437 | 124,808 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations depreciation |
890 | 1,260 | 3,224 | 5,202 | ||||||||||||
Non-real estate depreciation |
(1,969 | ) | (1,927 | ) | (6,526 | ) | (6,017 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustment for depreciation on development profits |
| | (1,546 | ) | | |||||||||||
Adjustments to derive FFO, as adjusted from consolidated joint ventures |
||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners noncontrolling interests (Net income) |
2,527 | 6,058 | 4,220 | 8,829 | ||||||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders noncontrolling interests (Net income (loss)) |
132 | 447 | 5 | (3,543 | ) | |||||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders noncontrolling interests (Development profits) |
11 | 1,388 | 117 | 2,445 | ||||||||||||
FFO, as adjusted attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(7,855 | ) | (8,587 | ) | (20,797 | ) | (24,326 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustments to derive FFO, as adjusted from unconsolidated joint ventures |
||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of net income |
(3,348 | ) | (3,257 | ) | (12,416 | ) | (7,507 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of FFO, as adjusted |
15,936 | 11,079 | 45,833 | 35,000 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments for impairments, restructuring charges and debt extinguishment |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate impairment losses |
| | | 172,059 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations real estate impairment losses |
| | | 9,794 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
1,029 | | 4,874 | 3,824 | ||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
1,967 | | 2,546 | 657 | ||||||||||||
Allocation to participating securities(2) |
(52 | ) | (261 | ) | (125 | ) | (889 | ) | ||||||||
Funds from operations, as adjusted(1) |
$ | 54,998 | $ | 106,531 | $ | 154,193 | $ | 240,685 | ||||||||
FFO, as adjusted per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.32 | $ | 0.71 | $ | 0.94 | $ | 1.80 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares and units (diluted) |
170,985 | 149,088 | 164,277 | 133,351 | ||||||||||||
(1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(2) | Represents amount of FFO allocated to outstanding unvested restricted shares. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, there were 1,216 unvested restricted shares. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, there were 920 unvested restricted shares. |
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 5
Consolidated Balance Sheets (dollars in thousands) |
2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
As of | ||||||||
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Investments in real estate |
||||||||
Total investments in properties |
$ | 6,871,262 | $ | 6,708,660 | ||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(1,219,307 | ) | (1,113,808 | ) | ||||
Net investments in properties |
5,651,955 | 5,594,852 | ||||||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
690,088 | 462,130 | ||||||
Properties held for sale or contribution, net |
228,349 | 214,426 | ||||||
Net investments in real estate |
6,570,392 | 6,271,408 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
205,591 | 206,077 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
159,093 | 155,958 | ||||||
Other assets |
188,650 | 208,515 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 7,123,726 | $ | 6,841,958 | ||||
Liabilities and equity |
||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Secured debt |
$ | 968,085 | $ | 1,096,554 | ||||
Unsecured senior debt |
1,571,271 | 1,155,529 | ||||||
Unsecured credit facilities |
249,108 | 477,630 | ||||||
Other debt |
278,443 | 482,883 | ||||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
357,800 | 338,042 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
3,424,707 | 3,550,638 | ||||||
Equity |
||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Common equity |
3,107,871 | 2,716,604 | ||||||
Preferred equity |
223,412 | 223,412 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
3,331,283 | 2,940,016 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
||||||||
Joint venture partners |
306,575 | 289,909 | ||||||
Limited partnership unitholders |
61,161 | 61,395 | ||||||
Total noncontrolling interests |
367,736 | 351,304 | ||||||
Total equity |
3,699,019 | 3,291,320 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 7,123,726 | $ | 6,841,958 | ||||
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 6
Supplemental Cash Flow Information (dollars in thousands) |
2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
For the Quarters Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
AMBs Owned and Managed Portfolio:(1)(2) |
||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Information: |
||||||||||||||||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 5,790 | $ | 5,975 | $ | 22,210 | $ | 20,141 | ||||||||
AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of
lease intangibles |
$ | 2,944 | $ | 2,179 | $ | 13,297 | $ | 8,926 | ||||||||
Gross lease termination fees |
$ | 1,731 | $ | 1,759 | $ | 3,330 | $ | 5,486 | ||||||||
Net lease termination fees(3) |
$ | 1,431 | $ | 1,214 | $ | 2,595 | $ | 3,916 | ||||||||
AMBs share of net lease termination fees |
$ | 1,420 | $ | 852 | $ | 2,381 | $ | 1,844 | ||||||||
Recurring capital expenditures: |
||||||||||||||||
Tenant improvements |
$ | 8,206 | $ | 8,651 | $ | 24,236 | $ | 13,697 | ||||||||
Lease commissions and other lease costs |
8,899 | 8,952 | 25,530 | 19,517 | ||||||||||||
Building improvements |
11,301 | 4,262 | 24,112 | 13,619 | ||||||||||||
Sub-total |
28,406 | 21,865 | 73,878 | 46,833 | ||||||||||||
Co-investment venture partners share of capital
expenditures |
(8,076 | ) | (8,642 | ) | (21,693 | ) | (17,492 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures |
$ | 20,330 | $ | 13,223 | $ | 52,185 | $ | 29,341 | ||||||||
AMBs Consolidated Portfolio: |
||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Information: |
||||||||||||||||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 2,245 | $ | 1,969 | $ | 11,052 | $ | 6,903 | ||||||||
AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of
lease intangibles |
$ | 1,916 | $ | 1,965 | $ | 9,902 | $ | 6,872 | ||||||||
Gross lease termination fees |
$ | 1,731 | $ | 1,383 | $ | 2,964 | $ | 2,815 | ||||||||
Net lease termination fees(3) |
$ | 1,431 | $ | 855 | $ | 2,322 | $ | 1,597 | ||||||||
AMBs share of net lease termination fees |
$ | 1,420 | $ | 726 | $ | 2,293 | $ | 1,322 | ||||||||
Recurring capital expenditures: |
||||||||||||||||
Tenant improvements |
$ | 6,370 | $ | 4,860 | $ | 17,519 | $ | 7,938 | ||||||||
Lease commissions and other lease costs |
6,873 | 5,965 | 17,585 | 13,273 | ||||||||||||
Building improvements |
7,136 | 3,214 | 16,560 | 10,113 | ||||||||||||
Sub-total |
20,379 | 14,039 | 51,664 | 31,324 | ||||||||||||
Co-investment venture partners share of capital
expenditures |
(2,460 | ) | (1,928 | ) | (6,271 | ) | (4,668 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures |
$ | 17,919 | $ | 12,111 | $ | 45,393 | $ | 26,656 | ||||||||
(1) | See Reporting Definitions. | |
(2) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosure for a discussion of owned and managed supplemental cash flow information. | |
(3) | Net lease termination fees are defined as gross lease termination fees less the associated straight-line rent balance. |
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 7
Operations Overview(1) (dollars in thousands) |
2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
Square | ||||||||||||||||
Feet | ABR | % of ABR | ||||||||||||||
1 | Deutsche Post World Net (DHL) |
3,127,230 | $ | 28,452 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||
2 | United States Government |
1,355,450 | $ | 20,228 | 2.2 | % | ||||||||||
3 | Sagaw a Express |
1,172,253 | $ | 19,404 | 2.2 | % | ||||||||||
4 | Nippon Express |
1,029,170 | $ | 14,942 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||
5 | FedEx Corporation |
1,400,090 | $ | 14,780 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||
6 | Panalpina |
1,336,351 | $ | 9,030 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||
7 | Kuehne + Nagel Inc. |
1,480,692 | $ | 8,801 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||
8 | Caterpillar Logistics Services |
543,039 | $ | 8,698 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||
9 | La Poste |
903,543 | $ | 8,245 | 0.9 | % | ||||||||||
10 | BAX Global/Schenker/Deutsche Bahn |
843,179 | $ | 8,117 | 0.9 | % | ||||||||||
Subtotal |
13,190,997 | $ | 140,697 | 15.7 | % | |||||||||||
Top 11-20 Customers |
5,955,376 | 50,591 | 5.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Total |
19,146,373 | $ | 191,288 | 21.2 | % | |||||||||||
(1) | Owned and managed portfolio, not including value-added acquisitions. | |
(2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(3) | Represents trailing four quarter data. |
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 8
Operating Statistics(1) |
2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
Owned & Managed Portfolio(2) | Same Store Pool(2) | |||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | |||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | September 30, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||
Square feet |
139,822,998 | 136,703,087 | 127,051,011 | 127,522,980 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of owned & managed square feet |
90.9 | % | 93.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Occupancy |
||||||||||||||||
Occupancy percentage at period end(2) |
92.6 | % | 91.8 | % | 92.1 | % | 91.4 | % | ||||||||
Occupancy percentage at period end (prior year) |
91.0 | % | 90.5 | % | 91.4 | % | 91.1 | % | ||||||||
Average occupancy percentage(2) |
91.7 | % | 90.1 | % | 91.3 | % | 89.7 | % | ||||||||
Average occupancy percentage (prior year) |
90.4 | % | 91.1 | % | 90.3 | % | 91.2 | % | ||||||||
Weighted average lease terms (years) |
||||||||||||||||
Original |
6.2 | 6.3 | 6.2 | 6.3 | ||||||||||||
Remaining |
3.4 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.4 |
Owned & Managed Portfolio(2) | Same Store Pool(2) | |||||||||||||||
Trailing Four Quarters | Trailing Four Quarters | Trailing Four Quarters | Trailing Four Quarters | |||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | September 30, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||
Tenant retention(2) |
67.1 | % | 66.2 | % | 66.0 | % | 65.6 | % | ||||||||
Rent change on renewals and rollovers(2) |
||||||||||||||||
Percentage |
(11.8 | %) | (11.2 | %) | (11.9 | %) | (11.2 | %) | ||||||||
Same space square footage commencing (millions) |
25.1 | 26.2 | 24.7 | 26.1 | ||||||||||||
Second generation TIs and LCs per square foot(2) |
||||||||||||||||
Retained |
$ | 1.43 | $ | 1.20 | ||||||||||||
Re-tenanted |
$ | 2.59 | $ | 2.81 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average |
$ | 2.01 | $ | 1.96 | ||||||||||||
Second generation square footage commencing (millions) |
31.4 | 32.4 | ||||||||||||||
Gross operating margin(2) |
70.6 | % | 70.5 | % | 71.4 | % | 71.4 | % |
Same Store Pool(2) | ||||||||
Quarter Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||
Cash Basis NOI percent change(2) | September 30, 2010 | September 30, 2010 | ||||||
Decrease in revenues excluding lease termination fees(3) |
(2.6 | %) | (3.6 | %) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in expenses(3) |
(1.6 | %) | (0.8 | %) | ||||
Decrease in NOI excluding lease termination fees(2)(3) |
(3.0 | %) | (4.6 | %) | ||||
Decrease in NOI including lease termination fees(2)(3) |
(3.0 | %) | (4.9 | %) |
(1) | Owned and managed portfolio, not including value-added acquisitions. | |
(2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(3) | For the quarter ended September 30, 2010, on a consolidated basis, the percent change was (2.9)%, 1.4%, (4.8)% and (4.3)%, respectively, for decrease in revenues excluding lease termination fees, increase in expenses, decrease in NOI excluding lease termination fees and decrease in NOI including lease termination fees. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, on a consolidated basis, the percent change was (4.3)%, 1.4%, (6.7)% and (6.5)%, respectively, for decrease in revenues excluding lease termination fees, increase in expenses, decrease in NOI excluding lease termination fees and decrease in NOI including lease termination fees. |
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 9
Portfolio Overview |
2010 Third Quarter Earnings
Conference Call |
|||
% of Total | Year-to-Date | Trailing Four | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owned and | AMBs Share | Annualized | Same Store NOI | Quarters Rent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Square Feet | Placed in | Square Feet | Managed Square | of Square | Year-to-Date | Base Rent | Growth Without | Change on | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
as of | Acquired | Operations | Disposed | as of | Feet as of | Feet as of | Average | psf as of | Lease | Renewals and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6/30/2010 | Square Feet | Square Feet(1) | Square Feet | 9/30/2010 | 9/30/2010 | 9/30/2010 | Occupancy | 9/30/2010 | Termination Fees(2) | Rollovers(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
18,959,573 | | | 18,959,573 | 13.6 | % | 59.5 | % | 92.3 | % | $ | 6.34 | (0.9 | %) | (15.5 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago |
13,118,853 | | | (26,065 | ) | 13,092,788 | 9.4 | % | 58.3 | % | 90.8 | % | 5.01 | (5.4 | %) | (16.9 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No. New Jersey/New York |
12,354,345 | | 700,645 | | 13,054,990 | 9.3 | % | 59.8 | % | 86.9 | % | 7.07 | (11.2 | %) | (14.6 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco Bay Area |
10,960,044 | | | 10,960,044 | 7.8 | % | 77.7 | % | 91.8 | % | 6.29 | (5.6 | %) | (3.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle |
7,882,575 | | 786 | | 7,883,361 | 5.6 | % | 57.2 | % | 90.3 | % | 5.41 | (12.8 | %) | (7.3 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
South Florida |
6,363,198 | 882,400 | 189,791 | (401,650 | ) | 7,033,739 | 5.0 | % | 68.8 | % | 96.1 | % | 6.95 | 6.5 | % | (29.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. On-Tarmac |
2,467,838 | | 345 | | 2,468,183 | 1.8 | % | 93.1 | % | 87.7 | % | 19.25 | (4.9 | %) | (9.1 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other U.S. Markets |
28,962,048 | | 3,430 | (40,800 | ) | 28,924,678 | 20.7 | % | 65.4 | % | 87.4 | % | 5.25 | (8.8 | %) | (17.3 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Subtotal / Wtd Avg |
101,068,474 | 882,400 | 894,997 | (468,515 | ) | 102,377,356 | 73.2 | % | 64.3 | % | 90.3 | % | $ | 6.24 | (5.9 | %) | (13.9 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
3,564,450 | | | | 3,564,450 | 2.5 | % | 100.0 | % | 98.6 | % | $ | 5.52 | 35.6 | % | (19.7 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mexico City |
4,572,848 | | 11,625 | | 4,584,473 | 3.3 | % | 42.4 | % | 95.3 | % | 5.60 | (0.1 | %) | (14.3 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guadalajara |
2,890,526 | | 8,056 | | 2,898,582 | 2.1 | % | 21.6 | % | 92.4 | % | 4.36 | (12.8 | %) | (7.6 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Mexico Markets |
893,500 | | 195,847 | | 1,089,347 | 0.8 | % | 71.8 | % | 70.9 | % | 4.01 | (81.1 | %) | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mexico Subtotal / Wtd Avg |
8,356,874 | | 215,528 | | 8,572,402 | 6.2 | % | 39.1 | % | 91.6 | % | $ | 5.02 | (9.9 | %) | (11.9 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total / Wtd Avg |
112,989,798 | 882,400 | 1,110,525 | (468,515 | ) | 114,514,208 | 81.9 | % | 63.5 | % | 90.4 | % | $ | 6.13 | (5.4 | %) | (13.9 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
4,097,774 | 178,326 | 44,778 | | 4,320,878 | 3.1 | % | 41.5 | % | 96.7 | % | $ | 7.85 | (4.1 | %) | (17.7 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
3,208,633 | | (25,252 | ) | | 3,183,381 | 2.3 | % | 38.3 | % | 96.5 | % | 8.50 | (6.2 | %) | (10.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
3,263,379 | | (3,089 | ) | | 3,260,290 | 2.3 | % | 40.2 | % | 85.2 | % | 9.75 | (12.7 | %) | (3.0 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe Markets |
1,065,173 | | | | 1,065,173 | 0.8 | % | 50.4 | % | 100.0 | % | 11.00 | 0.3 | % | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe Subtotal / Wtd Avg |
11,634,959 | 178,326 | 16,437 | | 11,829,722 | 8.5 | % | 41.1 | % | 93.5 | % | $ | 8.81 | (7.0 | %) | (8.3 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tokyo |
6,052,219 | | 333,670 | | 6,385,889 | 4.6 | % | 34.1 | % | 93.0 | % | $ | 16.50 | 4.3 | % | (10.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Osaka |
2,000,037 | | | | 2,000,037 | 1.4 | % | 20.0 | % | 90.8 | % | 13.19 | 4.5 | % | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Japan Markets |
| | | | | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | | 0.0 | % | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan Subtotal / Wtd Avg |
8,052,256 | | 333,670 | | 8,385,926 | 6.0 | % | 30.7 | % | 92.5 | % | $ | 15.68 | 4.3 | % | (6.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
China |
2,496,250 | | 1,067,068 | | 3,563,318 | 2.5 | % | 100.0 | % | 84.6 | % | $ | 4.54 | (27.4 | %) | 14.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Singapore |
935,926 | | | | 935,926 | 0.7 | % | 100.0 | % | 96.1 | % | 10.17 | (3.4 | %) | 10.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia Markets |
593,898 | | | | 593,898 | 0.4 | % | 100.0 | % | 91.7 | % | 7.31 | (12.4 | %) | (20.8 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total / Wtd Avg |
12,078,330 | | 1,400,738 | | 13,479,068 | 9.6 | % | 56.9 | % | 91.2 | % | $ | 12.17 | (12.3 | %) | (2.6 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owned and Managed Total / Wtd Avg(2) |
136,703,087 | 1,060,726 | 2,527,700 | (468,515 | ) | 139,822,998 | 100.0 | % | 61.0 | % | 90.7 | % | $ | 6.94 | (4.6 | %) | (11.8 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Real Estate Investments(3) |
7,495,959 | | | | 7,495,959 | 51.8 | % | 87.2 | % | 5.63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Portfolio |
144,199,046 | 1,060,726 | 2,527,700 | (468,515 | ) | 147,318,957 | 60.5 | % | 90.5 | % | $ | 6.88 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction-in-Progress |
3,154,245 | 920,482 | (4) | (1,067,058 | )(5) | (1,404,045 | )(6) | 1,603,624 | 52.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-Stabilized Developments(2) |
8,323,513 | 1,404,045 | (4) | (1,464,131 | )(5) | (6,615 | )(6) | 8,256,812 | 97.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development Portfolio Subtotal |
11,477,758 | 2,324,527 | (2,531,189 | ) | (1,410,660 | ) | 9,860,436 | 90.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value-added acquisitions(2) |
467,345 | 751,185 | | | 1,218,530 | 95.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Global Portfolio |
156,144,149 | 4,136,438 | (3,489 | ) | (1,879,175 | ) | 158,397,923 | 62.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Represents assets placed in operations from development and may include positive/(negative) remeasurements of square footage as operating assets. | |
(2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(3) | Includes operating properties held through AMBs investments in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage and are therefore excluded from the owned and managed portfolio as well as the location of AMBs global headquarters. | |
(4) | For construction-in-progress, represents square footage of development starts. For pre-stabilized developments, represents new projects available. | |
(5) | For construction-in-progress, represents square footage of completed development projects placed in operations. For pre-stabilized developments, represents projects placed in operations. | |
(6) | For construction-in-progress, represents square footage of completed development projects placed in pre-stabilized developments or disposed. For pre-stabilized developments, represents projects disposed. |
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 10
Capital Deployment Overview (dollars in millions) |
2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
Development Portfolio by Region as of September 30, 2010(1)
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
Development Starts(1)
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
Property Acquisitions by Region for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2010(3)
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
Acquisition Volume(3)
(Acquisition Cost(2))
(Acquisition Cost(2))
(1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. Estimated total investment is before the impact of real estate impairment losses. | |
(2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(3) | Owned and managed portfolio and value-added acquisitions, excludes land inventory purchases. |
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 11
Property Acquisitions(1) (dollars in thousands) |
2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2010 | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition | % of Total | Acquisition | % of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Square Feet | Cost(2) | Acquisition Cost | Square Feet | Cost(2) | Acquisition Cost | |||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
1,633,585 | $ | 98,333 | 88.7 | % | 2,788,862 | $ | 157,223 | 79.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
| 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
1,633,585 | $ | 98,333 | 88.7 | % | 2,788,862 | $ | 157,223 | 79.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
178,272 | $ | 12,525 | 11.3 | % | 178,272 | $ | 12,525 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Germany |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
| | 0.0 | % | 140,264 | 29,388 | 14.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
178,272 | $ | 12,525 | 11.3 | % | 318,536 | $ | 41,913 | 21.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
China |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total Acquisitions |
1,811,857 | $ | 110,858 | 100.0 | % | 3,107,398 | $ | 199,136 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
46.0 | % | 42.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cash Cap Rate(3) |
6.6 | % | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition | % of Total | Acquisition | % of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Square Feet | Cost(2) | Acquisition Cost | Square Feet | Cost(2) | Acquisition Cost | |||||||||||||||||||
By Entity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Property Corporation |
676,010 | $ | 23,548 | 21.2 | % | 1,143,355 | $ | 36,886 | 18.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
AMB Europe Fund I |
178,272 | 12,525 | 11.3 | % | 318,536 | 41,913 | 21.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund |
957,575 | 74,785 | 67.5 | % | 1,645,507 | 120,337 | 60.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total Acquisitions |
1,811,857 | $ | 110,858 | 100.0 | % | 3,107,398 | $ | 199,136 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Owned and managed portfolio and value-added acquisitions. | |
(2) | Includes estimated total acquisition capital expenditures of approximately $6.4 million and $6.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. | |
(3) | Weighted average stabilized cap rate is defined as weighted average stabilized cash cap rate excluding the impact of straight line rents and amortization of lease intangibles. See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. |
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 12
Contributions and Dispositions(1) (dollars in thousands) |
2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2010 | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Operating Property | Development Property | Operating Property | Development Property(2) | |||||||||||||
AMBs Ownership Contributed and Disposed |
100.0 | % | 50.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 81.0 | % | ||||||||
Contribution Value and Disposition Price |
$ | 34,891 | $ | 4,505 | $ | 44,909 | $ | 52,363 | ||||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cap Rate(3)(4) |
7.7 | % | N/A | 7.1 | % | 7.3 | % | |||||||||
Development Margin, before real estate
impairment losses(4) |
N/A | 3.8 | % | N/A | (9.0 | %) | ||||||||||
Development Margin, net of real estate
impairment losses(4) |
N/A | 4.6 | % | N/A | 7.5 | % |
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2010 | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Property | Development Property | Operating Property | Development Property(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Square Feet | Square Feet | Land Acreage(5) | Square Feet | Square Feet | Land Acreage(5) | |||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
468,515 | 6,615 | | 602,175 | 337,862 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
468,515 | 6,615 | | 602,175 | 337,862 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
| | | | 37,760 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
| | 5 | | 141,933 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
| | 5 | | 179,693 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
China |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
468,515 | 6,615 | 5 | 602,175 | 517,555 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
(2) | Includes installment sale of 0.2 million square feet and $12.5 million initiated in the fourth quarter of 2009 and completed in the first quarter of 2010. | |
(3) | Excludes value-added conversions, development for sale, and land sales. | |
(4) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(5) | Represents acreage for land sales and value-added conversion projects. |
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 13
Development Starts and
Completions(1) (dollars in thousands) |
2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
Development Starts(2) | Development Completions(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2010 | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 | For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2010 | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated | % of Total | Estimated | % of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated | Total | Estimated | Estimated | Total | Estimated | Total | % of Total | Total | % of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Square Feet | Investment(2) | Investment(2) | Square Feet | Investment(2) | Investment(2) | Square Feet | Investment(3) | Investment(2) | Square Feet | Investment(3) | Investment(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | 389,767 | $ | 36,009 | 9.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
639,264 | 56,522 | 80.8 | % | 639,264 | 56,522 | 80.8 | % | 450,445 | 40,076 | 24.2 | % | 607,202 | 47,854 | 12.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
639,264 | $ | 56,522 | 80.8 | % | 639,264 | $ | 56,522 | 80.8 | % | 450,445 | $ | 40,076 | 24.2 | % | 996,969 | $ | 83,863 | 22.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | 692,754 | $ | 56,767 | 15.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | 427,832 | 47,744 | 28.9 | % | 427,832 | 47,744 | 12.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | 448,123 | 53,772 | 14.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | 427,832 | $ | 47,744 | 28.9 | % | 1,568,709 | $ | 158,283 | 42.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | 420,847 | $ | 54,415 | 14.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
China |
281,218 | 13,454 | 19.2 | % | 281,218 | 13,454 | 19.2 | % | 1,592,826 | 77,565 | 46.9 | % | 1,592,826 | 77,565 | 20.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
281,218 | $ | 13,454 | 19.2 | % | 281,218 | $ | 13,454 | 19.2 | % | 1,592,826 | $ | 77,565 | 46.9 | % | 2,013,673 | $ | 131,980 | 35.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
920,482 | $ | 69,976 | 100.0 | % | 920,482 | $ | 69,976 | 100.0 | % | 2,471,103 | $ | 165,385 | 100.0 | % | 4,579,351 | $ | 374,126 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage | 60 | % | 60 | % | 100.0 | % | 94.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield(2)(4) | 12.4 | % | 12.4 | % | 6.4 | % | 6.3 | % |
(1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
(2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(3) | Includes value-added conversions. | |
(4) | Calculated using estimated total investment before the impact of cumulative real estate impairment losses. |
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 14
Development Portfolio(1) (dollars in thousands) |
2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
2010 Expected Completions(2) | 2011 Expected Completions(2) | Total Construction-in-Progress | Pre-Stabilized Developments(2) | Total Development Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | % of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated | Total | Estimated | Total | Estimated | Total | Estimated | Total | Estimated | Total | Estimated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Square Feet | Investment(2)(3) | Square Feet | Investment(2)(3) | Square Feet | Investment(2)(3) | Square Feet | Investment(2)(3) | Square Feet | Investment(2)(3) | Investment(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
| $ | | 557,915 | $ | 66,209 | 557,915 | $ | 66,209 | 1,460,679 | $ | 167,425 | 2,018,594 | $ | 233,634 | 22.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
| | 639,264 | 56,522 | 639,264 | 56,522 | 1,720,167 | 106,709 | 2,359,431 | 163,231 | 15.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
| $ | | 1,197,179 | $ | 122,731 | 1,197,179 | $ | 122,731 | 3,180,846 | $ | 274,134 | 4,378,025 | $ | 396,865 | 37.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
| $ | | | $ | | | $ | | 647,976 | $ | 50,205 | 647,976 | $ | 50,205 | 4.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
| | | | | | 567,440 | 66,129 | 567,440 | 66,129 | 6.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
125,227 | 23,434 | | | 125,227 | 23,434 | 655,366 | 87,631 | 780,593 | 111,065 | 10.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
| | | | | | 444,043 | 45,612 | 444,043 | 45,612 | 4.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
125,227 | $ | 23,434 | | $ | | 125,227 | $ | 23,434 | 2,314,825 | $ | 249,577 | 2,440,052 | $ | 273,011 | 25.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
| $ | | | $ | | | $ | | 2,235,373 | $ | 354,240 | 2,235,373 | $ | 354,240 | 33.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
China |
| | 281,218 | 13,454 | 281,218 | 13,454 | 525,768 | 21,906 | 806,986 | 35,360 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | | | | | | | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
| $ | | 281,218 | $ | 13,454 | 281,218 | $ | 13,454 | 2,761,141 | $ | 376,146 | 3,042,359 | $ | 389,600 | 36.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
125,227 | $ | 23,434 | 1,478,397 | $ | 136,185 | 1,603,624 | $ | 159,619 | 8,256,812 | $ | 899,857 | 9,860,436 | $ | 1,059,476 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate impairment losses | (624 | ) | (71,419 | ) | (72,043 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated total investment, net of real estate impairment losses | $ | 158,995 | $ | 828,438 | $ | 987,433 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Projects | 1 | 5 | 6 | 29 | 35 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage | 50.0 | % | 46.5 | % | 47.0 | % | 97.3 | % | 89.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Remainder to Invest | $ | 883 | $ | 55,100 | $ | 55,983 | $ | 23,614 | $ | 79,597 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs Share of Remainder to Invest(2)(4)(5) | $ | 441 | $ | 29,235 | $ | 29,676 | $ | 23,534 | $ | 53,210 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield(2)(5) | 6.6 | % | 9.2 | % | 8.8 | % | 6.4 | % | 6.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield, net of real estate impairment losses(2) | 6.8 | % | 9.2 | % | 8.9 | % | 6.9 | % | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percent Pre-Leased(2) | 0.0 | % | 36.4 | % | 33.6 | % | 56.8 | % | 53.1 | % |
(1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
(2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(3) | Includes value-added conversion projects. | |
(4) | Amounts include capitalized interest as applicable. | |
(5) | Calculated using estimated total investment before the impact of cumulative real estate impairment losses |
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 15
Land, Value-Added Conversion, and Redevelopment Inventory(1)(2) (dollars in thousands) |
2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
Land Inventory
The Americas | Europe | Asia | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of June 30, 2010 |
2,228 | 37,490,712 | 232 | 4,725,415 | 141 | 5,144,921 | 2,601 | 47,361,048 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
107 | 1,744,906 | | | | | 107 | 1,744,906 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
| | (5 | ) | (105,411 | ) | | | (5 | ) | (105,411 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Development starts |
(29 | ) | (639,264 | ) | | | (11 | ) | (281,218 | ) | (40 | ) | (920,482 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| | | | | (10,785 | ) | | (10,785 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of September 30, 2010 |
2,306 | 38,596,354 | 227 | 4,620,004 | 130 | 4,852,918 | 2,663 | (3) | 48,069,276 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in Land(4) |
$ | 647,499 | $ | 152,074 | $ | 146,818 | $ | 946,391 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative real estate impairment losses |
$ | (152,657 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in land, net of cumulative real estate impairment losses |
$ | 793,734 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of investment in land, net of cumulative real estate impairment losses | $ | 386,254 | $ | 75,889 | $ | 144,167 | $ | 606,310 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Cost per SF | $ | 4.25 | $ | 13.10 | $ | 25.50 | $ | 5.93 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Cost per Floor Area Ratio SF | $ | 10.34 | $ | 29.08 | $ | 29.71 | $ | 13.71 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Purchase Date (in years) | 4.5 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 4.1 |
Value-Added Conversion Inventory(1)(5)
East Region | West Region | Central Region | The Americas | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Number of | Number of | Number of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion Time Frame | Acres | Projects | Acres | Projects | Acres | Projects | Acres | Projects | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 years or less |
| | 9 | 1 | | | 9 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3+ years |
7 | 2 | 213 | 12 | | | 220 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
7 | 2 | 222 | 13 | | | 229 | (6) | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Redevelopment Inventory(1)(5)
East Region | West Region | Central Region | The Americas | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Square | Number of | Square | Number of | Square | Number of | Square | Number of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Redevelopment Time Frame | Feet | Projects | Feet | Projects | Feet | Projects | Feet | Projects | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 years or less |
40,800 | 1 | | | | | 40,800 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3+ years |
| | 998,372 | 3 | | | 998,372 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
40,800 | 1 | 998,372 | 3 | | | 1,039,172 | (7) | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(2) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. Does not include value-added acquisitions. | |
(3) | AMBs share of acres and square feet of estimated build out including amounts held in unconsolidated co-investment ventures is 2,346 acres and 42.3 million square feet, respectively. | |
(4) | Represents actual cost incurred to date including initial acquisition, infrastructure, and associated carry costs. | |
(5) | East, West and Central regions represent AMBs geographic division of the Americas. | |
(6) | AMBs share is 192 acres. | |
(7) | AMBs share is 705,336 square feet. |
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 16
Private Capital Co-investment Ventures Overview (dollars in millions) |
2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
Date | Geographic | Functional | Incentive Distribution | |||||||||
Co-investment Venture | Established | Focus | Principal Venture Investors | Currency | Frequency | Term | ||||||
AMB-SGP
|
March 2001 | United States | Subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd. | USD | 10 years | March 2011; extendable 10 years | ||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II
|
June 2001 | United States | Various | USD | At dissolution | December 2014 (estimated) | ||||||
AMB-AMS
|
June 2004 | United States | Various | USD | At dissolution | December 2012; extendable 4 years | ||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund(1)
|
October 2004 | United States | Various | USD | 3 years (next 2Q11) | Open end | ||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico
|
December 2004 | Mexico | Subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd. | USD | 7 years | December 2011; extendable 7 years | ||||||
AMB Japan Fund I
|
June 2005 | Japan | Various | JPY | At dissolution | June 2013; extendable 2 years | ||||||
AMB DFS Fund I
|
October 2006 | United States | GE Real Estate | USD | Upon project sales | Perpetual(2) | ||||||
AMB Europe Fund I
|
June 2007 | Europe | Various | EUR | 3 years (next 2Q13) | Open end | ||||||
AMB Mexico Fondo Logistico
|
July 2010 | Mexico | Various | USD | At dissolution | July 2020 |
YTD Additions to Private Capital Co-investment Ventures(3)
Gross Carrying Value of Private Capital Co-investment Ventures(4)
(1) | Effective January 1, 2010, the name of AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III was changed to AMB U.S. Logistics Fund. | |
(2) | For AMB DFS Fund I, the investment period ended in June 2009. The fund will terminate upon completion and disposition of assets currently owned and under development by the fund. | |
(3) | Additions to private capital co-investment ventures include both acquisitions from third parties as well as assets contributed to co-investment ventures from AMB. | |
(4) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. |
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 17
Joint Ventures Financial Summary (dollars in thousands) |
2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
AMBs | Gross | AMBs | Estimated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ownership | Square | Book | Property | Other | Net Equity | Investment | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | Percentage | Feet(1) | Value(2) | Debt | Debt | Investment(3) | Capacity | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Co-Investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund(4) |
33% | 37,627,853 | $ | 3,398,015 | $ | 1,615,452 | $ | | $ | 330,353 | $ | 150,000 | ||||||||||||||||
AMB Europe Fund I(4) |
31% | 9,718,555 | 1,266,484 | 661,196 | | 123,428 | 300,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
20% | 7,263,090 | 1,561,793 | 896,669 | 9,579 | 82,535 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
22% | 6,352,092 | 359,813 | 164,640 | 148,438 | (5) | 17,687 | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Co-investment Ventures |
29% | 60,961,590 | 6,586,105 | 3,337,957 | 158,017 | 554,003 | 450,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Development Co-investment Ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB DFS Fund I |
15% | 200,027 | 86,025 | | | 14,507 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund(4) |
33% | 557,915 | 93,798 | | | 30,623 | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Development Co-investment Ventures |
24% | 757,942 | 179,823 | | | 45,130 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated Co-investment Ventures(6) |
29% | 61,719,532 | 6,765,928 | 3,337,957 | 158,017 | 599,133 | 450,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
51% | 7,419,049 | (7) | 286,078 | 154,515 | | 52,939 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Development Joint Ventures |
50% | 639,264 | 43,014 | | | 22,215 | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
30% | 69,777,845 | $ | 7,095,020 | $ | 3,492,472 | $ | 158,017 | $ | 674,287 | $ | 450,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Co-investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP |
50% | 8,289,140 | $ | 478,839 | $ | 331,595 | $ | | ||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
24% | 7,321,372 | 517,533 | 186,781 | 54,300 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
39% | 2,170,337 | 160,660 | 76,049 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Co-investment Ventures |
37% | 17,780,849 | 1,157,032 | 594,425 | 54,300 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Co-investment Ventures |
37% | 17,780,849 | 1,157,032 | 594,425 | 54,300 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
80% | 2,917,634 | 377,320 | 64,259 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Development Joint Ventures |
50% | 249,169 | 172,664 | 83,169 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Joint Ventures |
48% | 20,947,652 | $ | 1,707,016 | $ | 741,853 | $ | 54,300 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Selected Operating Results | FFO, as | FFO, as | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2010 | Cash NOI(8) | Net Income | adjusted(8) | Share of | Cash NOI(8) | Net Income | adjusted(8) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 98,752 | $ | 1,615 | (9) | $ | 42,009 | (9) | AMBs | $ | 29,510 | $ | 3,348 | $ | 15,936 | |||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 24,340 | $ | 4,840 | $ | 15,477 | Partners | $ | 13,098 | $ | 2,993 | $ | 7,855 | |||||||||||||||
Selected Operating Results | FFO, as | FFO, as | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 | Cash NOI(8) | Net Income | adjusted(8) | Share of | Cash NOI(8) | Net Income | adjusted(8) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 289,695 | $ | 10,572 | (9) | $ | 130,477 | (9) | AMBs | $ | 86,988 | $ | 12,416 | $ | 45,833 | |||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 71,758 | $ | 11,100 | $ | 42,761 | Partners | $ | 39,125 | $ | 5,687 | $ | 20,797 |
(1) | For development properties, represents the estimated square feet upon completion for the committed phases of development projects. | |
(2) | Represents the book value of the property (before accumulated depreciation), net of impairments, owned by the joint venture and excludes net other assets. Development book values include uncommitted land. | |
(3) | Through AMB Property Mexico, AMB holds an equity interest in various other non-core unconsolidated ventures for approximately $15.8 million. | |
(4) | The estimated investment capacity and investment capacities of AMB U.S. Logistics Fund and AMB Europe Fund I, as open-end funds, are not limited. The investment capacity represents estimated capacity based on the funds current cash and leverage limitations as of the most recent quarter end. | |
(5) | Includes $89.6 million of shareholder loans. | |
(6) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures for unconsolidated co-investment venture operating results. | |
(7) | Includes investments in 7.3 million square feet of operating properties through AMBs investment in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage which it excludes from its owned and managed portfolio. | |
(8) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(9) | Includes $3.9 and $11.5 million of interest expense on shareholder loans for AMB-SGP Mexico for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. |
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 18
Capitalization Summary (dollars in millions) |
2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
For the Quarter Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||
September 30, 2010 | September 30, 2010 | |||||||
Wholly-owned fixed charge coverage(2) |
2.7 | x | 2.6 | x | ||||
Fixed charge coverage(2) |
2.3 | x | 2.2 | x | ||||
Interest coverage(2) |
2.7 | x | 2.7 | x | ||||
Dividends per share-to-FFO, as adjusted per share(2) |
87.5 | % | 89.4 | % | ||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization(2) |
43.3 | % | 43.3 | % | ||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total assets(2) |
41.0 | % | 41.0 | % |
(1) | Debt amounts represent AMBs share of debt and preferred securities. | |
(2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(3) | Includes $600 million of estimated investment capacity in AMB Mexico Fondo Logistico. |
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 19
Capitalization Detail (dollars in thousands, except shares and share price) |
2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
AMB Wholly-Owned | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unsecured | Total | Consolidated | Total | Unconsolidated | AMBs Share of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior | Credit | Other | Secured | Wholly-Owned | Joint Venture | Consolidated | Joint | Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt | Facilities(1) | Debt | Debt | Debt | Debt | Debt | Venture Debt | Debt | Debt | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 |
$ | 63,000 | $ | | $ | | $ | 280 | $ | 63,280 | $ | 11,719 | $ | 74,999 | $ | 12,743 | $ | 87,742 | $ | 72,743 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 |
69,000 | 249,108 | | 15,487 | 333,595 | 136,940 | 470,535 | 620,338 | 1,090,873 | 567,557 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
| | 224,143 | 29,576 | 253,719 | 468,820 | 722,539 | 462,806 | 1,185,345 | 558,673 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
293,897 | | | 22,775 | 316,672 | 103,817 | 420,489 | 812,825 | 1,233,314 | 569,765 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
| | | 4,765 | 4,765 | 8,944 | 13,709 | 598,760 | 612,469 | 200,872 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
112,491 | | | 7,685 | 120,176 | 16,943 | 137,119 | 462,829 | 599,948 | 278,613 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 |
250,000 | | | 79,620 | 329,620 | 15,499 | 345,119 | 70,053 | 415,172 | 358,508 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 |
300,000 | | | 65,994 | 365,994 | 490 | 366,484 | 10,528 | 377,012 | 369,668 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 |
125,000 | | | | 125,000 | 595 | 125,595 | 92,361 | 217,956 | 155,497 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 |
250,000 | | | | 250,000 | 29,229 | 279,229 | 7,223 | 286,452 | 269,241 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thereafter |
119,732 | | | | 119,732 | 3,095 | 122,827 | 415,692 | 538,519 | 257,233 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
$ | 1,583,120 | $ | 249,108 | $ | 224,143 | $ | 226,182 | $ | 2,282,553 | $ | 796,091 | $ | 3,078,644 | $ | 3,566,158 | $ | 6,644,802 | $ | 3,658,370 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unamortized net (discounts) premiums |
(11,849 | ) | | | 50 | (11,799 | ) | 62 | (11,737 | ) | (5,282 | ) | (17,019 | ) | (15,116 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
$ | 1,571,271 | $ | 249,108 | $ | 224,143 | $ | 226,232 | $ | 2,270,754 | $ | 796,153 | $ | 3,066,907 | $ | 3,560,876 | $ | 6,627,783 | $ | 3,643,254 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners share of debt(2) |
| | | | | (457,061 | ) | (457,061 | ) | (2,527,468 | ) | (2,984,529 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of total debt(2) |
$ | 1,571,271 | $ | 249,108 | $ | 224,143 | $ | 226,232 | $ | 2,270,754 | $ | 339,092 | $ | 2,609,846 | $ | 1,033,408 | $ | 3,643,254 | $ | 3,643,254 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average interest rate |
5.8 | % | 0.9 | % | 3.4 | % | 3.0 | % | 4.8 | % | 4.9 | % | 4.8 | % | 4.6 | % | 4.7 | % | 4.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average remaining maturity (years) |
6.0 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 5.2 | 4.9 | 2.2 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 4.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Market Equity | ||||||||||||
Security | Shares | Price | Value | |||||||||
Common Stock |
168,216,188 | (3) | $ | 26.47 | $ | 4,452,682 | ||||||
LP Units |
3,305,152 | $ | 26.47 | 87,487 | ||||||||
Total |
171,521,340 | $ | 4,540,169 | |||||||||
Total options outstanding |
9,317,539 | |||||||||||
Dilutive effect of
stock options(4) |
|
Preferred Stock | ||||||||||||
Dividend | Liquidation | |||||||||||
Security | Rate | Preference | ||||||||||
Series L preferred stock |
6.50 | % | $ | 50,000 | ||||||||
Series M preferred stock |
6.75 | % | 57,500 | |||||||||
Series O preferred stock |
7.00 | % | 75,000 | |||||||||
Series P preferred stock |
6.85 | % | 50,000 | |||||||||
Weighted Average/Total |
6.80 | % | $ | 232,500 | ||||||||
Capitalization Ratios | ||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization(2)(5) |
43.3 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt plus preferred-to-AMBs
share of total market capitalization(2)(5) |
46.1 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total assets(2) |
41.0 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt plus preferred-to-AMBs share of total assets(2) |
43.6 | % |
(1) | Represents three credit facilities with total capacity of approximately $1.7 billion. Includes $126.6 million, $68.0 million, $29.7 million and $24.8 million in Yen, Canadian dollar, Euro and Singapore dollar-based borrowings outstanding at September 30, 2010, respectively, translated to U.S. dollars using the foreign exchange rates in effect on September 30, 2010. | |
(2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(3) | Includes 1,215,982 shares of unvested restricted stock. | |
(4) | Computed using the treasury stock method and an average share price of $24.73 for the quarter ended September 30, 2010. All stock options were anti-dilutive as of September 30, 2010. | |
(5) | Total Market Capitalization is defined as total debt plus preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market equity. |
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 20
Debt Maturities(1) (dollars in thousands) |
2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
After Extension Options(2) | ||||||||||||||||
AMB Wholly-Owned Debt | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Unsecured Senior Debt |
$ | 63,000 | $ | 69,000 | $ | | $ | 293,897 | ||||||||
Credit Facilities |
| 156,336 | 92,772 | | ||||||||||||
Other Debt |
| | 224,143 | | ||||||||||||
AMB Secured Debt |
| 14,365 | 28,214 | 21,612 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
63,000 | 239,701 | 345,129 | 315,509 | ||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
| | | 39,409 | ||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
1,064 | | 3,888 | 196,828 | ||||||||||||
AMB-SGP |
| 41,297 | 290,297 | | ||||||||||||
Other Industrial Joint Ventures |
| 54,807 | 31,432 | 20,729 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
1,064 | 96,104 | 325,617 | 256,966 | ||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
| 58,825 | 164,640 | | ||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
| 226,650 | 197,845 | 481,672 | ||||||||||||
AMB Europe Fund I |
| | | | ||||||||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund |
| 162,537 | 76,243 | 283,667 | ||||||||||||
Other Industrial Joint Ventures |
| 31,316 | | 57,677 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
| 479,328 | 438,728 | 823,016 | ||||||||||||
Total Consolidated |
64,064 | 335,805 | 670,746 | 572,475 | ||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated |
| 479,328 | 438,728 | 823,016 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 64,064 | $ | 815,133 | $ | 1,109,474 | $ | 1,395,491 | ||||||||
Total AMBs Share |
$ | 63,256 | $ | 418,209 | $ | 610,118 | $ | 606,647 |
(1) | Excludes scheduled principal amortization of debt maturing in years subsequent to 2013 as well as debt premiums and discounts. | |
(2) | Subject to certain conditions. |
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 21
Supplemental Information for Net Asset Value Analysis (NAV) (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
Actual | ||||||||
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
September 30, 2010 | ||||||||
Real Estate: |
||||||||
Wholly-owned property cash NOI from continuing operations(1) |
$ | 77,739 | ||||||
AMBs share of cash NOI from joint ventures: |
||||||||
Total cash NOI from joint ventures from continuing operations(1) |
$ | 123,623 | ||||||
AMBs share of joint ventures(1) |
32.8 | % | ||||||
AMBs share of cash NOI from joint ventures from continuing operations(1) |
40,577 | |||||||
Adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI: |
||||||||
NOI attributed to construction-in-progress |
$ | (154 | ) | |||||
NOI
attributed to pre-stabilized development
projects(1)(2) |
(4,465 | ) | ||||||
NOI attributed to contributed developments |
| |||||||
NOI required
to stabilize properties acquired and moved to operations
|
891 | |||||||
Other adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI:(3) |
4,801 | |||||||
Adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI(4) |
1,073 | |||||||
Total AMBs share of cash NOI from continuing operations
related to operating properties(1)(5) |
$ | 119,389 | ||||||
AMBs
share of average occupancy(5) |
91.3 | % | ||||||
Development platform:(4) |
||||||||
Development starts |
$ | 69,976 | ||||||
Private capital platform: |
||||||||
Total private capital revenue per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.05 |
As of | ||||
AMBs share of:(1) | September 30, 2010 | |||
Development, land, value-added acquisitions and contributed
assets, net of real estate impairment losses:(5) |
||||
Construction-in-progress (invested to date) |
$ | 45,027 | ||
Pre-stabilized development projects (invested to date)(1) |
780,352 | |||
Value-added acquisitions(1) |
33,675 | |||
Land held for future development |
606,310 | |||
Assets contributed to co-investment ventures(6) |
| |||
Total development, land, value-added acquisitions and
contributed assets, net of real estate impairment losses |
$ | 1,465,364 | ||
Debt and preferred securities:(5) |
||||
Total debt |
$ | 3,643,254 | ||
Preferred securities |
232,500 | |||
Total debt and preferred securities |
$ | 3,875,754 | ||
Other balance sheet items:(5) |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
$ | 271,070 | ||
Accounts receivable (net) and other assets |
359,580 | |||
Deferred rents receivable and deferred financing costs (net) |
(104,226 | ) | ||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
(394,935 | ) | ||
Total other balance sheet items |
$ | 131,489 |
(1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(2) | Includes an adjustment to remove any NOI generated from value-added acquisitions. | |
(3) | Other adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI include free rent granted in the quarter and non-property related revenues and expenses. | |
(4) | Transaction activity adjustments remove NOI generated from in-progress developments, contributed developments, and projects held for sale or contribution as the value of this real estate is reflected in AMBs share of development, land, and contributed assets as detailed above. The adjustments also include stabilized NOI for acquisitions. | |
(5) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated joint ventures. | |
(6) | Represents AMBs share of assets contributed to unconsolidated co-investment ventures during the three months ended September 30, 2010. |
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 22
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures | 2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
Acquisition Cost includes estimated acquisition capital expenditures. Estimated acquisition
capital expenditures include immediate building improvements that are taken into consideration when
underwriting the purchase of a building or which are incurred to bring a building up to operating
standard or to stabilization and incremental building improvements and leasing costs that are
incurred in an effort to substantially increase the revenue potential of an existing building.
Adjusted EBITDA, Wholly-owned Adjusted EBITDA and AMBs share of Adjusted EBITDA. AMB uses adjusted
earnings before interest (including the amount of capitalized interest deducted from the
determination of development gains), tax, depreciation and amortization, impairment charges,
restructuring, losses on early extinguishment of debt and other non-cash charges, stock based
compensation amortization, and non-development gains, or adjusted EBITDA, to measure both its
operating performance and liquidity. AMB considers adjusted EBITDA to provide investors relevant
and useful information because it permits investors to view income from its operations on an
unleveraged basis before the effects of tax, non-cash depreciation and amortization expense
(including stock-based compensation amortization) or non-development gains. By excluding interest
expense, adjusted EBITDA allows investors to measure AMBs operating performance independent of its
capital structure and indebtedness and, therefore, allows for a more meaningful comparison of its
operating performance between quarters as well as annual periods and to compare its operating
performance to that of other companies, both in the real estate industry and in other industries.
AMB considers adjusted EBITDA to be a useful supplemental measure for reviewing its comparative
performance with other companies because, by excluding non-cash depreciation and amortization
expense, adjusted EBITDA can help the investing public compare the performance of a real estate
company to that of companies in other industries. The impairment charges were principally a result
of increases in estimated capitalization rates and deterioration in market conditions that
adversely impacted values. The restructuring charges reflected costs associated with AMBs
reduction in global headcount and cost structure. Debt extinguishment losses generally included the
costs of repurchasing debt securities. AMB repurchased certain tranches of senior unsecured debt to
manage its debt maturities in response to the current financing environment, resulting in greater
debt extinguishment costs. Although difficult to predict, these items may be recurring given the
uncertainty of the current economic climate and its adverse effects on the real estate and
financial markets. While not infrequent or unusual in nature, these items result from market
fluctuations that can have inconsistent effects on AMBs results of operation. The economics
underlying these items reflect market and financing conditions in the short-term but can obscure
AMBs performance and the value of AMBs long-term investment decisions and strategies. Management
believes adjusted EBITDA is significant and useful to both it and its investors. Adjusted EBITDA
more appropriately reflects the value and strength of AMBs business model and its potential
performance isolated from the volatility of the current economic environment and unobscured by
costs (or gains) resulting from AMBs management of its financing profile in response to the
tightening of the capital markets. As a liquidity measure, AMB believes that adjusted EBITDA helps
investors to analyze its ability to meet debt service obligations and to make quarterly preferred
share dividends and unit distributions. Management uses adjusted EBITDA when measuring AMBs
operating performance and liquidity; specifically when assessing its operating performance, and
comparing that performance to other companies, both in the real estate industry and in other
industries, and when evaluating its ability to meet debt service obligations and to make quarterly
preferred share dividends and unit distributions. AMB believes investors should consider adjusted
EBITDA, in conjunction with net income (the primary measure of AMBs performance) and the other
required GAAP measures of its performance and liquidity, to improve their understanding
of AMBs
operating results and liquidity, and to make more meaningful comparisons of its performance between
periods and as against other companies. By excluding interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization, impairment charges, restructuring, debt extinguishment losses, stock based
compensation amortization and other non-cash charges and non-development gains when assessing AMBs
financial performance, an investor is assessing the earnings generated by AMBs operations, but not
taking into account the eliminated expenses or non-development gains incurred in connection with
such operations. As a result, adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and should be
used in conjunction with AMBs required GAAP presentations. Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect AMBs
historical cash expenditures or future cash requirements for working capital, capital expenditures
or contractual commitments. Adjusted EBITDA also does not reflect the cash required to make
interest and principal payments on AMBs outstanding debt. While adjusted EBITDA is a relevant and
widely used measure of operating performance and liquidity, it does not represent net income or
cash flow from operations as defined by GAAP and it should not be considered as an alternative to
those indicators in evaluating operating performance or liquidity. Further, AMBs computation of
adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to EBITDA reported by other companies. Management compensates
for the limitations of adjusted EBITDA by providing investors with financial statements prepared
according to U.S. GAAP, along with this detailed discussion of adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation
of adjusted EBITDA to net
income (or loss), a U.S. GAAP measurement. AMB defines AMBs share of
adjusted EBITDA to be AMB Property Corporations pro rata portion of adjusted EBITDA based on its
direct or indirect percentage of equity interests in its joint ventures and other investments. AMB
defines wholly-owned adjusted EBITDA to be that portion of adjusted EBITDA, which is solely
attributable to assets and activities that are 100% directly or indirectly owned by AMB Property
Corporation plus cash distributions from joint venture relationships. AMB includes these
distributions as they are an additional source of cash flow available to service AMBs obligations.
AMB believes these supplemental measures are useful by providing investors with more comprehensive
disclosure regarding AMBs performance and its ability to cover its financial obligations on both a
wholly owned basis and on a total portfolio basis.
The following table reconciles adjusted EBITDA, wholly-owned adjusted EBITDA and AMBs share of
adjusted EBITDA from net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
(dollars in thousands):
For the Quarters Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 13,592 | $ | 76,464 | $ | 22,285 | $ | (17,858 | ) | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
50,590 | 45,975 | 145,437 | 124,808 | ||||||||||||
Impairment charges |
| | | 172,059 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
1,029 | | 4,874 | 3,824 | ||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
1,967 | | 2,546 | 657 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation amortization and other non-cash charges |
5,774 | 4,731 | 18,699 | 17,065 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
32,125 | 27,498 | 97,364 | 88,216 | ||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations, including gains, excluding development profits |
(12,237 | ) | (11,043 | ) | (18,450 | ) | (39,155 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustment for depreciation on development profits |
| | (1,546 | ) | | |||||||||||
Income tax expense |
538 | 177 | 2,937 | 3,060 | ||||||||||||
Capitalized interest attributable to development properties sold or contributed |
566 | 1,226 | 3,548 | 14,085 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations adjusted EBITDA |
1,627 | 3,716 | 5,926 | 17,661 | ||||||||||||
Less: Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures, net |
(3,348 | ) | (3,257 | ) | (12,416 | ) | (7,507 | ) | ||||||||
Less: Adjusted EBITDA attributable to consolidated joint ventures |
(25,227 | ) | (27,036 | ) | (74,607 | ) | (80,973 | ) | ||||||||
Distributions from consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures |
9,631 | 5,405 | 28,115 | 24,220 | ||||||||||||
Wholly-owned adjusted EBITDA |
76,627 | 123,856 | 224,712 | 320,162 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments to derive adjusted EBITDA from consolidated joint ventures: |
||||||||||||||||
Distributions from consolidated joint ventures to AMB |
(3,977 | ) | (4,280 | ) | (12,874 | ) | (15,844 | ) | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to consolidated joint ventures |
25,227 | 27,036 | 74,607 | 80,973 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(13,495 | ) | (14,975 | ) | (40,514 | ) | (44,545 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustments to derive adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated joint ventures: |
||||||||||||||||
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures to AMB |
(5,654 | ) | (1,125 | ) | (15,241 | ) | (8,376 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of FFO, as adjusted |
15,936 | 11,079 | 45,833 | 35,000 | ||||||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense |
13,291 | 9,647 | 39,532 | 29,760 | ||||||||||||
AMBs share of adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 107,955 | $ | 151,238 | $ | 316,055 | $ | 397,130 | ||||||||
AMBs share of calculations for certain financial measures represent the pro-rata portion of
the applicable financial measure based on AMBs percentage of equity interest in each of the
consolidated and unconsolidated co-investment ventures accounted for in the applicable financial
measure. AMB believes that AMBs share of calculations are meaningful and useful supplemental
measures, which enable both management and investors to assess the operations, earnings and growth
of AMB in light of AMBs ownership interest in its joint ventures and to compare the applicable
measure to that of other companies. In addition, it allows for a more meaningful comparison of the
applicable measure to that of other companies that do not consolidate any of their joint ventures.
AMBs share of calculations are not intended to reflect actual liability should there be a
default under loans or a liquidation of the joint ventures. AMBs computation of AMBs share of
measures may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies, as they may use different
methodologies for calculating these measures.
AMBs share of Other Balance Sheet Items. AMB believes that balance sheet information based on GAAP
provides the most appropriate information about financial position. However, AMB considers balance
sheet information reported on an owned and managed basis (such as AMBs share of cash and cash
equivalents and restricted cash, AMBs share of accounts receivable (net) and other assets, AMBs
share of deferred rents receivable and deferred financing costs (net), and AMBs share of accounts
payable and other liabilities) to be useful supplemental measures to help the investors better
understand AMBs operating performance. See Reporting Definitions for definitions of owned and
managed and AMBs share of. AMB believes that AMBs share of balance sheet items on an owned and
managed basis helps management and investors make a
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 23
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures | 2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
comprehensive assessment of AMBs total real estate portfolio and provides a better
understanding of AMBs operating activities. While such information is helpful to the investor, it
does not provide balance sheet information as defined by GAAP and is not a true alternative to such
GAAP measurements. Further, AMBs computation of its share of balance sheet items on an owned and
managed basis may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies, as they may use
different methodologies for calculating these measures.
AMBs share of total debt. AMBs share of total debt is the pro rata portion of the total debt
based on its percentage of equity interest in each of the consolidated and unconsolidated joint
ventures holding the debt. AMB believes that its share of total debt is a meaningful supplemental
measure, which enables both management and investors to analyze its leverage and to compare its
leverage to that of other companies. In addition, it allows for a more meaningful comparison of its
debt to that of other companies that do not consolidate their joint ventures. AMBs share of total
debt is not intended to reflect its actual liability should there be a default under any or all of
such loans or a liquidation of the joint ventures. See Capitalization Detail for a reconciliation
of total debt and AMBs share of total debt.
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total assets is calculated using the following
definitions: AMBs share of total debt is the pro rata portion of the total debt based on AMBs
percentage of equity interest in each of the consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures holding
the debt. AMBs share of total assets is the pro rata portion of total gross book value of assets
based on AMBs percentage of equity interest in each of the consolidated and unconsolidated joint
ventures holding the assets.
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization is calculated using the following
definitions: AMBs share of total debt is the pro rata portion of the total debt based on AMBs
percentage of equity interest in each of the consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures holding
the debt. AMBs definition of total market capitalization is AMBs share of total debt plus
preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market equity. AMBs definition of market equity is
the total number of outstanding shares of AMBs common stock and common limited partnership units
multiplied by the closing price per share of its common stock as of the period end.
Annualized base rent (ABR) is calculated as monthly base rent (cash basis) per the lease, as of a
certain date, multiplied by 12. If free rent is granted, then the first positive rent value is
used. Leases denominated in foreign currencies are translated using the currency exchange rate at
period end.
Assets Under Management is AMBs estimate of the value of the real estate it wholly owns or manages
through its consolidated and unconsolidated co-investment ventures or for clients of AMB Capital
Partners. Assets under management is calculated by adding the co-investment venture partners or
clients share of the carrying value of its real estate investment to AMBs share of total market
capitalization.
Average occupancy percentage represents the daily weighted occupancy of the total rentable square
feet leased, including month-to-month leases, divided by total rentable square feet. Space is
considered leased when the tenant has either taken physical or economic occupancy.
Carrying value is the sum of the most recent valuation of real estate investments plus subsequently
incurred capital expenditures. Generally, each real estate investment is valued once a year.
Cash-basis NOI. Cash-basis NOI is defined as NOI less straight line rents and amortization of lease
intangibles. AMB considers cash-basis NOI to be an appropriate and useful supplemental performance
measure because cash basis NOI reflects the operating performance of the real estate portfolio
excluding the effects of non-cash adjustments and provides a better measure of actual cash basis
rental growth for a year-over-year comparison. However, cash-basis NOI should not be viewed as an
alternative measure of financial performance since it does not reflect general and administrative
expenses, interest expenses, depreciation and amortization costs, capital expenditures and leasing
costs, or trends in development and construction activities that could materially impact results
from operations. Further, cash-basis NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate
investment trusts, as they may use different methodologies for calculating cash-basis NOI.
For a reconciliation of NOI from net income for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, refer to the
SS NOI definition. The following table reconciles AMB s share of cash-basis NOI from NOI for the
quarter ended September 30, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
For the Quarter Ended | ||||
September 30, 2010 | ||||
NOI |
$ | 104,324 | ||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
(2,245 | ) | ||
Consolidated joint venture cash NOI from continuing operations |
(24,340 | ) | ||
Wholly-owned property cash NOI |
77,739 | |||
AMBs share of consolidated joint venture cash NOI |
11,242 | |||
AMBs share of unconsolidated joint venture cash NOI |
29,335 | |||
AMBs share of transaction adjustments |
1,073 | |||
AMBs share of cash-basis NOI |
$ | 119,389 | ||
Co-investment Ventures are Joint Ventures with institutional investors,
managed by AMB from which AMB receives acquisition fees for third-party
acquisitions, portfolio and asset management distributions or fees, as well as
incentive distributions or promoted interests.
Co-investment venture operating results.
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs | Property | (Loss) from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ownership | Operating | Continuing | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage(1) | Revenues | Expenses | Operations | Income (Loss) | Cash NOI | FFO | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Co-investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund |
33 | % | $ | 68,867 | $ | (19,066 | ) | $ | 3,691 | $ | (1,569 | ) | $ | 47,121 | $ | 24,479 | ||||||||||||
AMB Europe Fund I |
31 | % | 22,681 | (4,307 | ) | 735 | 735 | 18,474 | 7,895 | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
20 | % | 27,540 | (6,080 | ) | 5,096 | 5,096 | 20,620 | 12,215 | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
22 | % | 8,090 | (804 | ) | (3,383 | ) (1) | (3,383 | ) (1) | 7,284 | (311 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
AMB DFS Fund I |
15 | % | | (431 | ) | (548 | ) | (518 | ) | (431 | ) | (426 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated Co-investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP |
50 | % | 10,617 | (3,410 | ) | (810 | ) | (810 | ) | 6,963 | 2,612 | |||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
24 | % | 13,025 | (3,354 | ) | 2,848 | 2,848 | 9,562 | 6,123 | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
39 | % | 4,069 | (1,094 | ) | 638 | 638 | 3,017 | 1,716 |
(1) | Includes $3.8 million of interest expense on loans from co-investment venture partners. |
Co-investment venture partners share of calculations for certain financial measures represent the
pro-rata portion of the applicable financial measure based on AMBs co-investment venture partners
percentage of equity interest in each of the consolidated or unconsolidated co-investment ventures
accounted for in the applicable financial measure.
Co-investment venture partners (or co-investors) share of debt is the co-investment venture
partners pro-rata portion of total debt.
Co-investment venture partners (or co-investors) share of equity is the pro-rata portion of the
co-investment venture partners share of carrying value less the co-investment venture partners
share of debt.
Completion is generally defined as properties that have reached Stabilization or properties that
have been substantially complete for at least 12 months.
Development activities include ground-up development, redevelopments, land sales and value-added
conversions.
Development margin is calculated as contribution value or disposition price less closing costs,
minus estimated total investment, before the impact of cumulative real estate impairment losses,
and any deferred rents, taxes or third party promotes before any deferrals on contributions,
divided by the estimated total investment, before the impact of cumulative real estate impairment
losses.
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 24
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures | 2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
Estimated FFO, as adjusted, by Business. Estimated FFO, as adjusted, by Business is FFO, as
adjusted generated by AMBs Real Estate Operations, Development and Private Capital business.
Estimated Development and Private Capital FFO, as adjusted, was determined by reducing Development
Profits, net of taxes, and Private Capital revenues by their respective estimated share of general
and administrative expenses, also defined as overhead. Developments and Private Capitals
estimated allocation of total general and administrative expenses was based on their respective
percentage of actual direct general and administrative expenses incurred. Estimated Real Estate
Operations FFO, as adjusted represents total AMB FFO, as adjusted, less estimated FFO, as adjusted,
attributable to Development and Private Capital. Management believes estimated FFO, as adjusted, by
business line is a useful supplemental measure of its operating performance because it helps the
investing public compare the operating performance of AMB s respective businesses to other
companies comparable businesses. Further, AMBs computation of FFO, as adjusted, by business line
may not be comparable to that reported by other real estate investment trusts as they may use
different methodologies in computing such measures.
Estimated investment capacity is AMBs estimate of the gross real estate which could be acquired
through the use of its equity commitments from co-investment venture partners plus AMBs funding
obligations and estimated debt capitalization.
Estimated total investment represents total estimated cost of development, expansion, including
initial acquisition costs, prepaid ground leases, buildings, and associated carry costs. Estimated
total investments are based on current forecasts and are subject to change. Non-U.S. Dollar
investments are translated to U.S. Dollars using the exchange rate at period end.
Estimated yields on development projects are calculated from estimated annual cash NOI following
occupancy stabilization divided by the estimated total investment. Yields exclude value added
conversion projects and are calculated on an after-tax basis for international projects.
Fixed charge coverage. Fixed charge coverage is defined as Adjusted EBITDA divided by fixed
charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense less joint venture partners share of interest
expense and amortization of finance costs and debt premiums, from continuing and discontinued
operations, plus AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated joint venture debt,
capitalized interest, preferred unit distributions and preferred stock dividends. AMB uses fixed
charge coverage to measure its liquidity. AMB believes fixed charge coverage is relevant and useful
to investors because it permits fixed income investors to measure AMBs ability to meet its
interest payments on outstanding debt, make distributions to its preferred unitholders and pay
dividends to its preferred shareholders. AMBs computation of fixed charge coverage may not be
comparable to fixed charge coverage reported by other companies.
The following table details the calculation of fixed charges for three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):
For the Quarters Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
Fixed charge | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization continuing operations |
$ | 32,125 | $ | 27,498 | $ | 97,364 | $ | 88,216 | ||||||||
Amortization of financing costs and debt premiums continuing operations |
(4,461 | ) | (3,048 | ) | (10,977 | ) | (9,300 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization discontinued operations |
5 | 153 | 5 | 818 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of financing costs and debt premiums discontinued operations |
(19 | ) | | (19 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||||||
Capitalized interest |
9,033 | 9,586 | 26,608 | 35,077 | ||||||||||||
Preferred unit distributions |
| 1,431 | | 4,295 | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
3,952 | 3,952 | 11,856 | 11,856 | ||||||||||||
Less: Fixed charge attributable to consolidated joint ventures |
(11,874 | ) | (11,243 | ) | (37,222 | ) | (39,098 | ) | ||||||||
Wholly-owned fixed charge |
28,761 | 28,329 | 87,615 | 91,860 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments to derive fixed charge from consolidated joint ventures: |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed charge attributable to consolidated joint ventures |
11,874 | 11,243 | 37,222 | 39,098 | ||||||||||||
Fixed charge attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(6,344 | ) | (6,407 | ) | (19,984 | ) | (22,196 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustments to derive fixed charge from unconsolidated joint ventures: |
||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of capitalized interest from unconsolidated joint ventures |
344 | 147 | 937 | 547 | ||||||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated joint ventures |
13,291 | 9,647 | 39,532 | 29,760 | ||||||||||||
Total fixed charge |
$ | 47,926 | $ | 42,959 | $ | 145,322 | $ | 139,069 | ||||||||
Funds From Operations, as adjusted (FFO, as adjusted) and Funds From Operations Per Share
and Unit, as adjusted (FFOPS, as adjusted) (together with FFO, as adjusted and FFOPS, as
adjusted, the FFO Measures, as adjusted). AMB believes that net income, as defined by U.S. GAAP,
is the most appropriate earnings measure. However, AMB considers funds from operations, as
adjusted (or FFO, as adjusted) and FFO, as adjusted, per share and unit (or FFOPS, as adjusted) to
be useful supplemental measures of its operating performance. AMB defines FFOPS, as adjusted, as
FFO, as adjusted, per fully diluted weighted average share of AMBs common stock and operating
partnership units. AMB calculates FFO, as adjusted, as net income (or loss) available to common
stockholders, calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, less gains (or losses) from dispositions of
real estate held for investment purposes and real estate-related depreciation, and adjustments to
derive AMBs pro rata share of FFO, as adjusted, of consolidated and unconsolidated joint
ventures. This calculation also includes adjustments for items as described below.
Unless stated otherwise, AMB includes the gains from development, including those from value-added
conversion projects, before depreciation recapture, as a component of FFO, as adjusted. AMB
believes gains from development should be included in FFO, as adjusted, to more completely reflect
the performance of one of our lines of business. AMB believes that value-added conversion
dispositions are in substance land sales and as such should be included in FFO, as adjusted,
consistent with the real estate investment trust industrys long standing practice to include
gains on the sale of land in funds from operations. However, AMBs interpretation of FFO, as
adjusted, or FFOPS, as adjusted, may not be consistent with the views of others in the real estate
investment trust industry, who may consider it to be a divergence from the NAREIT definition, and
may not be comparable to funds from operations or funds from operations per share and unit
reported by other real estate investment trusts that interpret the current NAREIT definition
differently than AMB does. In connection with the formation of a joint venture, AMB may warehouse
assets that are acquired with the intent to contribute these assets to the newly formed venture.
Some of the properties held for contribution may, under certain circumstances, be required to be
depreciated under U.S. GAAP. If this circumstance arises, AMB intends to include in its
calculation of FFO, as adjusted, gains or losses related to the contribution of previously
depreciated real estate to joint ventures. Although such a change, if instituted, will be a
departure from the current NAREIT definition, AMB believes such calculation of FFO, as adjusted,
will better reflect the value created as a result of the contributions. To date, AMB has not
included gains or losses from the contribution of previously depreciated warehoused assets in FFO,
as adjusted.
In addition, AMB calculates FFO, as adjusted, to exclude impairment and restructuring charges,
debt extinguishment losses and the Series
D preferred unit redemption discount. The impairment charges were principally a result of
increases in estimated capitalization rates and deterioration in market conditions that adversely
impacted values. The restructuring charges reflected costs associated with AMBs reduction in
global headcount and cost structure. Debt extinguishment losses generally included the costs of
repurchasing debt securities. AMB repurchased certain tranches of senior unsecured debt to manage
its debt maturities in response to the current financing environment, resulting in greater debt
extinguishment costs. The Series D preferred unit redemption discount reflects the gain associated
with the discount to liquidation preference in the Series D preferred unit redemption price less
costs incurred as a result of the redemption. Although difficult to predict, these items may be
recurring given the uncertainty of the current economic climate and its adverse effects on the
real estate and financial markets. While not infrequent or unusual in nature, these items result from market
fluctuations that can have inconsistent effects on AMBs results of operations. The economics
underlying these items reflect market and financing conditions in the short-term but can
obscure AMBs performance and the value of AMBs long-term investment decisions and strategies.
Management believes FFO, as adjusted, is significant and useful to both it and its
investors. FFO, as adjusted, more appropriately reflects the value and strength of AMBs business model and its potential performance isolated from the volatility of the current economic
environment and unobscured by costs (or gains) resulting from AMBs management of its
financing profile in response to the tightening of the capital markets. However, in addition to the
limitations of FFO Measures, as adjusted, generally discussed below, FFO, as adjusted, does not
present a comprehensive measure of AMBs financial condition and operating performance. This
measure is a modification of the NAREIT definition of funds from operations and should not be used
as an alternative to net income or cash as defined by U.S. GAAP.
AMB believes that the FFO Measures, as adjusted, are meaningful supplemental measures
of its operating performance because historical cost accounting for real estate assets in
accordance with U.S. GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes
predictably over time, as reflected through depreciation and amortization expenses. However, since
real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market and
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 25 |
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures | 2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
other conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered presentation of
operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient.
Thus, the FFO Measures, as adjusted, are supplemental measures of operating performance for real
estate investment trusts that exclude historical cost depreciation and amortization, among other
items, from net income available to common stockholders, as defined by U.S. GAAP. AMB believes that
the use of the FFO Measures, as adjusted, combined with the required U.S. GAAP presentations, has
been beneficial in improving the understanding of operating results of real estate investment
trusts among the investing public and making comparisons of operating results among such companies
more meaningful. AMB considers the FFO Measures, as adjusted, to be useful measures for reviewing
comparative operating and financial performance because, by excluding gains or losses related to sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets and real
estate depreciation and amortization, the FFO Measures, as adjusted, can help the investing
public compare the operating performance of a companys real estate between periods or as compared
to other companies. While funds from operations and funds from operations per share are relevant
and widely used measures of operating performance of real estate investment trusts, the FFO
Measures, as adjusted, do not represent cash flow from operations or net income as defined by U.S.
GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to those measures in evaluating AMBs liquidity
or operating performance. The FFO Measures, as adjusted, also do not consider the costs associated
with capital expenditures related to AMBs real estate assets nor are the FFO Measures, as
adjusted, necessarily indicative of cash available to fund AMBs future cash requirements.
Management compensates for the limitations of the FFO Measures, as adjusted, by providing investors
with financial statements prepared according to U.S. GAAP, along with this detailed discussion of
the FFO Measures, as adjusted, and a reconciliation of the FFO Measures, as adjusted, to net income
available to common stockholders, a U.S. GAAP measurement.
See Consolidated Statements of Funds from Operations, as adjusted for a reconciliation of FFO, as
adjusted, from net income available to common stockholders.
The following table reconciles projected FFO, as adjusted excluding AMBs share of development
gains (or Core FFO, as adjusted) from projected net income available to common stockholders for
the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011:
2010 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Low | High | Low | High | |||||||||||||
Projected net (loss) income available to common stockholders |
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.07 | ||||||
AMBs share of projected depreciation and amortization |
1.33 | 1.33 | 1.36 | 1.36 | ||||||||||||
AMBs share of depreciation on development profits recognized to date |
(0.01 | ) | (0.01 | ) | | | ||||||||||
AMBs share of gains on dispositions of operating properties recognized to date |
(0.10 | ) | (0.10 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Loss on
early extinguishment of debt |
0.02 | 0.02 | | | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
0.03 | 0.03 | | | ||||||||||||
Impact of additional dilutive securities, other, rounding |
(0.03 | ) | (0.03 | ) | (0.03 | ) | (0.03 | ) | ||||||||
Projected Funds From Operations, as adjusted (FFO, as adjusted) |
$ | 1.23 | $ | 1.29 | $ | 1.30 | $ | 1.40 | ||||||||
AMBs share of development gains recognized to date |
(0.03 | ) | (0.03 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Projected FFO, as adjusted excluding AMBs share of
development gains (or Core FFO, as adjusted)(1) |
$ | 1.20 | $ | 1.26 | $ | 1.30 | $ | 1.40 | ||||||||
Amounts are expressed per share, except FFO, as adjusted, and Core FFO, as adjusted, which are
expressed per share and unit.
(1) As development gains are difficult to predict in the current economic environment, management
believes Projected Core FFO, as adjusted is the more appropriate and useful measure to reflect its
assessment of AMBs projected operating performance.
Gross operating margin is calculated as NOI divided by gross revenues (excluding straight-line
rents and amortization of lease intangibles, reimbursable capital revenue and lease termination
fees) for properties in the pool at period end.
Impairment charges represent the write down of assets due to estimated fair value being lower than
carry value.
Interest coverage. Interest coverage is defined as adjusted EBITDA divided by AMBs share of
interest expense which consists of consolidated interest expense less joint venture partners share
of interest expense, including amortization, from continuing and discontinued operations and AMBs
share of interest expense from
unconsolidated
joint venture debt. AMB uses interest coverage to measure its liquidity. AMB believes interest coverage is relevant and useful to investors because it permits investors to
measure AMBs ability to meet its interest payments on outstanding debt. AMBs computation of
interest coverage may not be comparable to interest coverage reported by other companies.
The following table details AMBs share of total interest for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):
For the Quarters Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
Interest | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization continuing operations |
$ | 32,125 | $ | 27,498 | $ | 97,364 | $ | 88,216 | ||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization discontinued operations |
5 | 153 | 5 | 818 | ||||||||||||
Joint venture partners share of interest expense |
(5,739 | ) | (5,633 | ) | (18,657 | ) | (19,870 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated joint ventures |
13,291 | 9,647 | 39,532 | 29,760 | ||||||||||||
Total interest |
$ | 39,682 | $ | 31,665 | $ | 118,244 | $ | 98,924 | ||||||||
Joint Ventures are all joint ventures, including Co-Investment Ventures, with real estate
developers, other real estate operators, or institutional investors where AMB may or may not: have
control, act as the manager and/or developer, earn asset management distributions or fees, or earn
incentive distributions or promoted interests. In certain cases, AMB might provide development,
leasing, property management and/or accounting services for which it may receive market
compensation.
Joint venture partners share of calculations for certain financial measures represent the pro-rata
portion of the applicable financial measure based on AMBs joint venture partners percentage of
equity interest in each of the consolidated or unconsolidated joint ventures accounted for in the
applicable financial measure.
Market equity is defined as the total number of outstanding shares of AMBs common stock and common
limited partnership units multiplied by the closing price per share of its common stock at period
end.
Net Asset Value (NAV). AMB believes NAV is a useful supplemental measure of its operating
performance because it enables both management and investors to analyze the fair value of its
business. An assessment of the fair value of a business involves estimates and assumptions and can
be performed using various methods. AMB has presented certain financial measures related to its
business that it believes may be useful to the investing public in calculating its NAV but has not
presented any specific methodology nor provided any guidance on assumptions or estimates that
should be used in the calculation.
Net Operating Income (NOI). See same store net operating income for discussion of NOI and a
reconciliation of NOI from net income.
Occupancy percentage at period end represents the percentage of total rentable square feet leased,
including month-to-month leases, divided by total rentable square feet at period end. Space is
considered leased when the tenant has either taken physical or economic occupancy.
Owned and managed is defined by AMB as assets in which AMB has at least a 10% ownership interest,
is the property or asset manager, and which it intends to hold for the long-term.
Owned and Managed Supplemental Cash Flow Information. AMB believes that cash flow information based
on GAAP provides the most appropriate cash flow information. However, AMB considers cash flow
information reported on an owned and managed basis (such as straight-line rents and amortization of
lease intangibles, AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles, gross
lease termination fees, net lease termination fees, AMBs share of net lease termination fees,
tenant improvements, lease commissions and other lease costs, building improvements, Co-investment
partners share of capital expenditures and AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures) to be
useful supplemental measures to help the investors better understand AMBs operating performance
and cash flow. See Reporting Definitions for definitions of owned and managed, AMBs share of
and Co-investment venture partners share of. AMB believes that owned and managed cash flow
information helps management and investors make a comprehensive
assessment of the cash flow of AMBs total real estate portfolio and provides a better understanding of AMBs operating
performance and activities. While owned and managed supplemental cash flow information is helpful
to the investor, it does not provide cash flow information as defined by GAAP and are
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 26 |
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures | 2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
not true alternatives to such GAAP measurements. Further, AMBs computation of owned and
managed supplemental cash flow information may not be comparable to that of other real estate
companies, as they may use different methodologies for calculating these measures.
Percent pre-leased represents the executed lease percentage of total square feet as of the
reporting date.
Pre-stabilized development represents assets which have reached Completion but have not yet reached
Stabilization.
Preferred, with respect to the capitalization ratios, is defined as preferred equity liquidation
preferences.
Redevelopment projects represent those buildings that require significant capital expenditures
(generally more than 25% of acquired cost or existing basis) to bring the buildings up to operating
standards and stabilization (generally 90% leased).
Recurring capital expenditures represents non-incremental building improvements and leasing costs
required to maintain current revenues. Recurring capital expenditures do not include estimated
acquisition capital expenditures which were taken into consideration when underwriting the purchase
of a building or which are incurred to bring a building up to operating standards.
Rent changes on renewals and rollovers are calculated as the difference, weighted by square feet,
of the net ABR due the first month of a term commencement and the net ABR due the last month of the
former tenants term. If free rent is granted, then the first positive full rent value is used as a
point of comparison. The rental amounts exclude base stop amounts, holdover rent and premium rent
charges. If either the previous or current lease terms are under 12 months, then they are excluded
from this calculation. If the lease is first generation or there is no prior lease for comparison,
then it is excluded from this calculation.
Same Store Net Operating Income, Cash-basis SS NOI (SS NOI) and Net Operating Income (NOI).
AMB defines NOI as rental revenues, including reimbursements, less property operating expenses. NOI
excludes depreciation, amortization, general and administrative expenses, restructuring charges,
real estate impairment losses, development profits (losses), gains (losses) from sale or
contribution of real estate interests, and interest expense. AMB believes that net income, as
defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure. However, NOI is a useful supplemental
measure calculated to help investors understand AMBs operating performance, excluding the effects
of gains (losses), costs and expenses which are not related to the performance of the assets. NOI
is widely used by the real estate industry as a useful supplemental measure, which helps investors
compare AMBs operating performance with that of other companies. Real estate impairment losses
have been excluded in deriving NOI because AMB does not consider its impairment losses to be a
property operating expense. AMB believes that the exclusion of impairment losses from NOI is a
common methodology used in the real estate industry. Real estate impairment losses relate to the
changing values of AMBs assets but do not reflect the current operating performance of the assets
with respect to their revenues or expenses. AMBs real estate impairment losses are non-cash
charges which represent the write down in the value of assets when estimated fair value over the
holding period is lower than current carrying value. The impairment charges were principally a
result of increases in estimated capitalization rates and deterioration in market conditions that
adversely impacted underlying real estate values. Therefore, the impairment charges are not related
to the current performance of AMBs real estate operations and should be excluded from its
calculation of NOI.
AMB considers SS NOI to be a useful supplemental measure of our operating performance for
properties that are considered part of the same store pool. AMB defines Cash-basis SS NOI as NOI on
a same store basis excluding straight line rents and amortization of lease intangibles. See
definition of same store pool. AMB considers SS NOI to be an appropriate and useful supplemental
performance measure because it reflects the operating performance of the real estate portfolio
excluding effects of non-cash adjustments and provides a better measure of actual cash basis rental
growth for a year-over-year comparison. In addition, AMB believes that SS NOI helps investors
compare the operating performance of AMBs real estate as compared to other companies. While SS NOI
is a relevant and widely used measure of operating performance of real estate investment trusts, it
does not represent cash flow from operations or net income as defined by GAAP and should not be
considered as an alternative to those measures in evaluating our liquidity or operating
performance. SS NOI also does not reflect general and administrative expenses, interest expenses,
real estate impairment losses,
depreciation and amortization costs, capital expenditures and leasing costs, or trends in
development and construction activities that could materially impact our results from operations.
Further, AMBs computation of SS NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies,
as they may use different methodologies for calculating SS NOI.
The following table reconciles consolidated cash-basis SS NOI and NOI from net loss for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):
For the Quarters Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 13,592 | $ | 76,464 | $ | 22,285 | $ | (17,858 | ) | |||||||
Private capital income |
(7,569 | ) | (7,886 | ) | (21,859 | ) | (27,376 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
50,590 | 45,975 | 145,437 | 124,808 | ||||||||||||
Real estate impairment losses |
| | | 172,059 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative and fund costs |
28,861 | 27,409 | 91,371 | 84,947 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
1,029 | | 4,874 | 3,824 | ||||||||||||
Total other income and expenses |
30,058 | 22,618 | 80,991 | 49,542 | ||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
(12,237 | ) | (64,045 | ) | (18,450 | ) | (92,157 | ) | ||||||||
NOI |
104,324 | 100,535 | 304,649 | 297,789 | ||||||||||||
Less non same-store NOI |
(19,450 | ) | (12,719 | ) | (50,770 | ) | (32,506 | ) | ||||||||
Less non cash adjustments(1) |
(1,652 | ) | (835 | ) | (6,895 | ) | (1,179 | ) | ||||||||
Cash-basis same-store NOI |
$ | 83,222 | $ | 86,981 | $ | 246,984 | $ | 264,104 | ||||||||
Less lease termination fees |
$ | (1,649 | ) | $ | (1,297 | ) | $ | (2,882 | ) | $ | (2,446 | ) | ||||
Cash-basis same-store NOI, excluding lease termination fees |
$ | 81,573 | $ | 85,684 | $ | 244,102 | $ | 261,658 | ||||||||
(1) Non-cash adjustments include straight line rents and amortization of lease intangibles for
the same store pool only.
Same store NOI growth is the change in the NOI (excluding straight-line rents and amortization of
lease intangibles) of the same store pool from the prior year reporting period to the current year
reporting period.
Same store pool includes all properties that are owned as of the end of both the current and prior
year reporting periods and excludes development properties for both the current and prior reporting
periods. The same store pool is set annually and excludes properties purchased and developments
stabilized after December 31, 2008.
Second generation TIs and LCs per square foot are total tenant improvements, lease commissions and
other leasing costs incurred during leasing of second generation space divided by the total square
feet leased. Costs incurred prior to leasing available space are not included until such space is
leased. Second generation space excludes newly developed square footage or square footage vacant at
acquisition.
Stabilization is generally defined as properties that are 90% occupied.
Stabilized cap rates are calculated as cash NOI or NOI, as applicable, stabilized to market
occupancy (generally 95%) divided by total acquisition cost. The total acquisition cost basis
includes the initial purchase price, the effects of marking assumed debt to market, buyers due
diligence, lease intangible adjustments, estimated acquisition capital expenditures, and leasing
costs necessary to achieve stabilization. AMB defines cash NOI as NOI excluding straight line rents
and amortization of lease intangibles.
Tenant retention is the square footage of all leases rented by existing tenants divided by the
square footage of all expiring and rented leases during the reporting period, excluding the square
footage of tenants that default or buy-out prior to expiration of their lease, short-term tenants
and the square footage of month-to-month leases.
Total market capitalization is defined by AMB as AMBs share of total debt plus preferred equity
liquidation preferences plus market equity (unless otherwise noted).
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 27
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures | 2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
Value-added acquisitions represent unstabilized properties which AMB acquires
as a part of managements current belief that the discount in pricing attributed
to the operating challenges of the property could provide greater returns, once
stabilized, than the returns of stabilized properties, which are not value added
acquisitions. Value added acquisitions generally have one or more of the following
characteristics: (i) existing vacancy, typically in excess of 20%, (ii) short-term
lease rollover, typically during the first two years of ownership, or (iii)
significant capital improvement requirements, typically in excess of 20% of the
purchase price. AMB excludes value-added acquisitions from its owned and managed
and consolidated operating statistics prior to stabilization (generally 90%
leased) in order to provide investors with data which it feels better reflects the
performance of its core portfolio.
Value-added conversion projects represent the repurposing of industrial properties
to a higher and better use, including office, residential, retail, research &
development or manufacturing. Activities required to prepare the property for
conversion to a higher and better use may include such activities as rezoning,
redesigning, reconstructing and retenanting. The sales price of the value-added
conversion project is generally based on the underlying land value based on its
ultimate use and as such, little to no residual value is ascribed to the
industrial building(s).
Wholly-owned fixed charge coverage is defined as wholly-owned adjusted EBITDA
divided by wholly-owned fixed charges. AMB believes that wholly-owned fixed charge
coverage is useful to certain investors whose focus is to understand AMBs ability
to cover those fixed charges which arise only from obligations which are solely
AMBs with adjusted EBITDA which is solely attributed to 100% owned assets and
activities plus cash distributions from joint ventures. See Fixed Charge Coverage.
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 28
Contacts | 2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
Contact Name | Title | Phone | E-mail Address | |||
Hamid R. Moghadam
|
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer | (415) 733-9401 | hmoghadam@amb.com | |||
Thomas S. Olinger
|
Chief Financial Officer | (415) 733-9405 | tolinger@amb.com | |||
Guy F. Jaquier
|
President, Europe and Asia; President, Private Capital | (415) 733-9406 | gjaquier@amb.com | |||
Eugene F. Reilly
|
President, The Americas | (617) 619-9333 | ereilly@amb.com | |||
Tracy A. Ward
|
Vice President, IR & Corporate Communications | (415) 733-9565 | tward@amb.com |
Corporate Headquarters | Investor Relations | Other Primary Office Locations | ||||||||
AMB Property Corporation
|
Tel: (415) 394-9000 | Amsterdam | Boston | Chicago | Los Angeles | |||||
Pier 1, Bay 1
|
Fax: (415) 394-9001 | México City | Shanghai | Singapore | Tokyo | |||||
San Francisco, CA 94111
|
E-mail: ir@amb.com | |||||||||
Tel: (415) 394-9000
|
Website: www.amb.com | |||||||||
Fax: (415) 394-9001 |
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 29
Forward-Looking Statements | 2010 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call | |||
Some of the information included in this report and the presentations to be held in
connection therewith contains forward-looking statements, such as those related to factors
regarding
positive net absorption, renewal of our lines of credit, future
financing activity, ability to access attractive financing globally,
our growth opportunities, long term prospects for AMB and industrial
real estate, scaled overhead structure, capital required for growth
and funding sources, our future debt and JV debt structure and
strategies regarding average remaining terms, average rates, floating
rates, bond issuances, credit facilities and secured debt,
consolidated vs. unconsolidated debt, share of JV debt vs. wholly
owned debt, NAV, compound annual growth rate, teams fully engaged in
best markets,
our buying advantage and investment opportunities available to us (including distressed or
strategic transactions), utilization of low yielding assets and acquiring assets in excess of cost
of capital,
recovery in leading business indicators and fundamentals, including rental rates, occupancy, real estate values, and
investor/customer interest, FFO, as adjusted, NOI and earnings generated by increased occupancy, rental rate
recovery, lease up of the development portfolio, monetization of land bank and development
capability, and the formation of new ventures,
capital deployment and other value creating activities, the
consummation of asset sales marketed, under contract or LOI, our opportunities and plans (including
those regarding our global positioning and future capital deployment), estimated financial and
performance results, our projected funds from operations, future assets under management, same
store and/or cash net operating income, development portfolio
lease-up, revenue, G&A, overhead expenses, deployed equity,
occupancy and other financial and operational guidance, our
future performance compared to peers and other market indices, rent growth, industrial and other
market, GDP and trade growth, market drivers, trends and forecasts, port opportunities, on-tarmac
opportunities, hiring, performance and retention of key personnel, leveraging of relationships,
continuation and effectiveness of strategic drivers, information regarding our development,
value-added conversion, redevelopment and value-added acquisition projects (including stabilization
or completion dates, square feet at stabilization or completion, sale or contribution dates, yields
from such projects, our share of remaining funding, costs and total investment amounts, scope,
location and timing of development starts and other projects, margins, projected gains and returns,
sustainability, profitability, demand for projects, targeted value-added conversion and acquisition
projects, intent of property use, redevelopment and conversion timelines, entitlement and
repositioning potential of land), ability to deliver customer solutions, strength of lender and
customer relationships, lease expirations, performance and value-creation of investments and market
entry opportunities, real estate valuations, capitalization rates, acquisition capital and volume,
scope and build out and monetization potential of land inventory, co-investment venture and other
estimated investment capacity, terms of the co-investment ventures, performance, revenues and
returns on investment, target leverage, timing and amounts of incentive, asset management,
acquisition and other private capital distributions, promotes and
fees, private capital demand, amounts of new investment, launching of
additional joint ventures, termination of funds, planned gross capitalization, future balance sheet
capacity to cover capital requirements, our plans and ability to retire, refinance and issue
secured and unsecured debt and maintain fixed charge coverage at certain levels, ability to
exercise or maintain credit extensions, our position to maintain a solid financial position,
maintain leverage targets and address debt maturities and interest rate changes, which are made
pursuant to the safe-harbor provisions of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Because these forward-looking
statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties, there are important factors that could cause
our actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, and you
should not rely on the forward-looking statements
as predictions of future events. The events or
circumstances reflected in forward-looking statements might not occur. You can identify
forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as believes, expects,
may, will, should, seeks, approximately, intends, plans, forecasting, pro forma,
estimates or anticipates or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words or
phrases. You can also identify forward-looking statements by discussions of strategy, plans or
intentions. Forward-looking statements should not be read as guarantees of future performance or
results, and will not necessarily be accurate indicators of whether, or the time at which, such
performance or results will be achieved. There is no assurance that the events or circumstances
reflected in forward-looking statements will occur or be achieved. Forward-looking statements are
necessarily dependent on assumptions, data or methods that may be incorrect or imprecise and we may
not be able to realize them. We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements, which reflect our analysis only and speak only as of the date of this report or the
dates indicated in the statements. We assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking
statements. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results and future events to
differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements: changes
in general economic conditions in California, the U.S. or globally (including financial market
fluctuations), global trade or in the real estate sector (including risks relating to decreasing
real estate valuations and impairment charges); risks associated with using debt to fund the
companys business activities, including refinancing and interest rate risks (including inflation
risks); the companys failure to obtain, renew, or extend necessary financing or access the debt or
equity markets; the companys failure to maintain its current credit agency ratings or comply with
its debt covenants; risks related to the companys obligations in the event of certain defaults
under co-investment venture and other debt; risks associated with equity and debt securities
financings and issuances (including the risk of dilution); defaults on or non-renewal of leases by
customers or renewal at lower than expected rent or failure to lease at all or on expected terms;
difficulties in identifying properties, portfolios of properties, or interests in real-estate
related entities or platforms to acquire and in effecting acquisitions on advantageous terms and
the failure of acquisitions to perform as the company expects; unknown liabilities acquired in
connection with the acquired properties, portfolios of properties, or interests in real-estate
related entities; the companys failure to successfully integrate acquired properties and
operations; risks and uncertainties affecting property development, redevelopment and value-added
conversion (including construction delays, cost overruns, the companys inability to obtain
necessary permits and financing, the companys inability to lease properties at all or at favorable
rents and terms, and public opposition to these activities); the companys failure to set up
additional funds, attract additional investment in existing funds or to contribute properties to
its co-investment ventures due to such factors as its inability to acquire, develop, or lease
properties that meet the investment criteria of such ventures, or the co-investment ventures
inability to access debt and equity capital to pay for property contributions or their allocation
of available capital to cover other capital requirements; risks and uncertainties relating to the
disposition of properties to third parties and the companys ability to effect such
transactions on
advantageous terms and to timely reinvest proceeds from any such dispositions; risks of doing
business internationally and global expansion, including unfamiliarity with the new markets and
currency and hedging risks; risks of changing personnel and roles; risks related to suspending,
reducing or changing the companys dividends; losses in excess of the companys insurance coverage;
changes in local, state and federal laws and regulatory requirements, including changes in real
estate, tax and zoning laws; increases in real property tax rates; risks associated with the
companys tax structuring; increases in interest rates and operating costs or greater than expected
capital expenditures; environmental uncertainties; risks related to natural disasters; and our
failure to qualify and maintain our status as a real estate investment trust. Our success also
depends upon economic trends generally, various market conditions and fluctuations and those other
risk factors discussed under the heading Risk Factors and elsewhere in our most recent annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
© 2010 AMB Property Corporation | 30