LOUISIANA FOOD Co - FORM S-1 - October 13, 2010
Attached files
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 13, 2010
|
Commission File Number: 333-_______
|
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
|
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
|
|
|
LOUISIANA FOOD COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
Nevada
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
2000
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
27-3257760
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
917 Third Street, Norco, Louisiana 70079
Telephone: (877) 732-2143
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code,
of registrant’s principal executive offices)
|
|
|
David Loflin, 917 Third Street, Norco, Louisiana 70079
(877) 732-2143
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)
|
|
|
Copies of communications to:
Eric Newlan, Esq.
Newlan & Newlan
800 Parker Square, Suite 205
Flower Mound, Texas 75028
Telephone: (972) 899-4070
Facsimile: (877) 796-3934
|
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: From time to time after the effective date of this
registration statement.
|
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box. [ ]
|
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering. [ ]
|
If this Form is a post effective amendment filed under Rule 462(c) of the Securities Act, check the following box and
list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. [ ]
|
If this Form is a post effective amendment filed under Rule 462(d) of the Securities Act, check the following box and
list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. [ ]
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer,
or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer’ and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
Large accelerated filer [ ]
|
|
Accelerated filer [ ]
|
Non-accelerated filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company [X]
|
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
Title of Each Class of
Securities to be Registered
|
|
Amount to be
Registered (1)
|
|
Proposed
Maximum
Offering
Price
Per Unit
|
|
Proposed
Maximum
Aggregate
Offering
Price (2)
|
|
Amount of
Registration
Fee (2)
|
Common Stock,
$.001 par value per share
|
|
8,380,000 shares (3)
1,000,000 shares (4)
|
|
$0.30
$0.30
|
|
$2,514,000
300,000
|
|
$179.25
21.39
|
TOTALS
|
|
9,380,000 shares
|
|
|
|
$2,814,000
|
|
$200.64
|
(1)
|
In the event of a stock split, stock dividend or similar transaction involving the common shares of the
registrant, in order to prevent dilution, the number of shares of common stock registered shall be
automatically increased to cover additional shares in accordance with Rule 416(a) under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended.
|
(2)
|
The offering price has been estimated solely for the purpose of computing the amount of the registration fee
in accordance with Rule 457(o). Our common stock is not traded on any national exchange and, in
accordance with Rule 457, the offering price was determined arbitrarily by our Board of Directors. The non-affiliate selling shareholders may sell shares of our common stock at a fixed price of $.30 per share until our
common stock is quoted on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (OTCBB) and thereafter at prevailing
market prices or privately negotiated prices; the affiliate selling shareholders, one officer and a promoter,
who are considered underwriters, must offer their shares at a fixed price of $.30 per share even if our shares
are quoted on the OTCBB. There can be no assurance that a market maker will agree to file the necessary
documents with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), which operates the OTCBB, nor can
there be any assurance that such an application for quotation will be approved.
|
(3)
|
Existing Shareholders.
|
(4)
|
Direct Public Offering.
|
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay
its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this
Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities
and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
|
THE INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE CHANGED. WE MAY NOT SELL THESE
SECURITIES UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
IS EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT SOLICITING AN
OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
|
PROSPECTUS
Subject to completion, dated October 13, 2010
LOUISIANA FOOD COMPANY
1,000,000 Shares By Direct Public Offering
8,380,000 Shares By Existing Shareholders
This is the initial public offering of Louisiana Food Company. All costs associated with the registration statement
of which this Prospectus is a part will be borne by us. Pursuant to this Prospectus, our company and the Selling
Shareholders may sell shares of our common stock as described herein.
|
There has never been a market for our common stock and a public market may never develop, or, if any market does
develop, it may not be sustained. Our common stock is not traded on any exchange or on the over-the-counter market.
We intend to have a market maker file an application with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”)
for our common stock to become eligible for trading on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (the “OTCBB”). We
do not yet have a market maker who has agreed to file such an application. There can be no assurance that our
common stock will ever be quoted on a stock exchange or a quotation service or that any market for our common
stock will develop.
|
1,000,000 of the shares of common stock being offered under this Prospectus are being offered by our company in
a direct public offering without any involvement of underwriters or broker-dealers, at a fixed price of $.30 per share.
Should all shares being offered by our company hereunder be sold, we would receive proceeds in the aggregate
amount of $300,000.
|
In offering the common stock, our officers and directors will rely on the safe harbor from broker-dealer registration
contained in Rule 3a4-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). The shares will be offered
by us for a period of 180 days from the date of this Prospectus, unless extended by our Board of Directors for an
additional 90 days.
|
|
Offering Price Per Share
|
|
Commissions
|
|
Gross Proceeds
|
1,000,000 Shares of Common Stock
|
$.30
|
|
Not Applicable
|
|
$300,000
|
8,380,000 of the shares of common stock being offered hereunder are being offered by the Selling Shareholders.
|
Non-affiliate Selling Shareholders
|
|
Affiliate Selling Shareholders
|
Non-affiliate Selling Shareholders are offering a total of
6,380,000 shares and will sell such shares at a fixed
price of $.30 per share, until our common stock is
quoted on the OTCBB and, thereafter, at prevailing
market prices or privately negotiated prices. Each of the
Non-affiliate Selling Shareholders may be deemed to be
an “underwriter”.
|
|
Affiliate Selling Shareholders (one of our officers and
a promoter) are offering a total of 2,000,000 shares at a
fixed price of $.30 per share. As these Affiliate Selling
Shareholders are considered underwriters, they are
required to offer their shares at the fixed price of $.30
per share, even after our common stock is quoted on the
OTCBB.
|
Our company will not derive any funds from sales of common stock by the Selling Shareholders.
|
INVESTING IN OUR COMMON STOCK INVOLVES VERY HIGH RISKS. SEE "RISK FACTORS"
BEGINNING ON PAGE 5.
|
NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES
COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THESE SECURITIES OR PASSED UPON THE
ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THE PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY
IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
|
WE HAVE NOT AUTHORIZED ANY DEALER, SALESPERSON OR OTHER PERSON TO GIVE ANY
INFORMATION OR REPRESENT ANYTHING NOT CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS. YOU
SHOULD NOT RELY ON ANY UNAUTHORIZED INFORMATION. THIS PROSPECTUS DOES NOT
OFFER TO SELL OR BUY ANY SHARES IN ANY JURISDICTION IN WHICH IT IS UNLAWFUL. THE
INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS CURRENT AS OF THE DATE ON THE COVER.
|
Dealer Prospectus Delivery Obligation
|
Until _________________ (90 days from the date of this Prospectus) all dealers that effect transactions in these
securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a Prospectus. This is in addition
to the dealers' obligation to deliver a Prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold
allotments or subscriptions.
|
Subject to Completion, the date of this Prospectus is October 13, 2010.
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
Prospectus Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Summary Financial Information. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk Factors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Determination of Offering Price. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Use of Proceeds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Plan of Distribution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State Securities (Blue Sky) Laws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dilution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Description of Securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Business. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. . . .
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Executive Compensation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Legal Matters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Experts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commission Position on Indemnification for Securities Act Liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Where You Can Find More Information. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Index to Financial Statements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exhibit “A” – Form of Subscription Agreement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
3
5
5
13
13
14
19
19
21
23
29
33
33
34
35
37
37
37
38
38
38
A-1
|
|
You should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference in this Prospectus in deciding
whether to purchase our common stock. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information different
from that contained or incorporated by reference in this Prospectus. Under no circumstances should the delivery to
you of this Prospectus or any sale made pursuant to this Prospectus create any implication that the information
contained in this Prospectus is correct as of any time after the date of this Prospectus. To the extent that any facts
or events arising after the date of this Prospectus, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change
in the information presented in this Prospectus, this Prospectus will be updated to the extent required by law.
|
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
The following summary highlights material information contained in this Prospectus. This summary does
not contain all of the information you should consider before investing in our common stock. Before making an
investment decision, you should read this Prospectus carefully, including the section entitled “Risk Factors” and the
financial statements and the notes thereto. You should also review the other available information referred to under
“Where You Can Find More Information”, as well as any amendment or supplement hereto. Unless otherwise
indicated, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer and relate to Louisiana Food Company, a Nevada corporation.
The Issuer
Louisiana Food Company was incorporated in the State of Nevada on August 17, 2010. Our focus is on
locating, developing and commercializing food-related business opportunities in the State of Louisiana. To date, we
have developed a line of Louisiana-centric packaged specialty food products, a line of specialty sauces and a line of
specialty coffee products. We sell these specialty food product lines to distributors, directly to retailers and directly
to consumers over the Internet. (See “Business”).
Our continued operations are dependent on our ability to obtain financing and upon our ability to achieve
future profitable operations from our specialty food product sales. Our independent registered public accounting firm
(our auditors) included in its audit report an explanatory paragraph as to an uncertainty with respect to our ability to
continue as a going concern. If we are not able to continue as a going concern, it is likely investors will lose their
investments.
|
Securities Offered
This Prospectus relates to the sale of up to 9,380,000 shares of our common stock. (See “Plan of
Distribution”).
Direct Public Offering. 1,000,000 shares of the common stock being offered hereunder are being offered
by our company in a direct public offering without any involvement of underwriters or broker-dealers, at a fixed price
of $.30 per share.
Selling Shareholders. 8,380,000 of the shares of common stock being offered hereunder are being offered
by the Selling Shareholders.
Non-affiliate Selling Shareholders. Non-affiliate Selling Shareholders are offering a total of 6,380,000
shares and will sell such shares at a fixed price of $.30 per share, until our common stock is quoted on the OTCBB
and, thereafter, at prevailing market prices or privately negotiated prices.
Affiliate Selling Shareholders. Affiliate Selling Shareholders (one of our officers and a promoter) are
offering a total of 2,000,000 shares at a fixed price of $.30 per share. As these Affiliate Selling Shareholders are
considered underwriters, they are required to offer their shares at the fixed price of $.30 per share, even after our
common stock is quoted on the OTCBB.
No Public Market
There is no public market for our common stock. We cannot give any assurance that the shares being offered
will have a market value, or that they can be resold at the offered price if and when an active secondary market might
develop, or that a public market for our securities may be sustained even if developed. The absence of a public market
for our common stock will make it difficult to sell your shares. We intend to have a market maker file an application
with FINRA for our common stock to become eligible for trading on the OTCBB.
Duration of Offering
Direct Public Offering. This Direct Public Offering of common stock by our company will be made for a
period not to exceed 180 days, unless extended by our Board of Directors for an additional 90 days.
Selling Shareholders. This offering by the Selling Shareholders will terminate on the earlier of the date on
which the shares are eligible for resale without restrictions pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act and the date
on which all shares offered by this Prospectus have been sold by the Selling Shareholders.
Shares Outstanding
Before This Offering. There are 25,880,000 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of the
date of this Prospectus.
After This Offering. Following this Direct Public Offering, if our company sells all 1,000,000 shares offered,
there will be 26,880,000 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding.
Offering Proceeds
Direct Public Offering. We are offering a total of 1,000,000 shares of common stock at an offering price
of $.30 per share, for a total of $300,000 in proceeds.
Selling Shareholders. Our company will not derive any funds from sales of common stock by the Selling
Shareholders.
|
Use of Proceeds
Proceeds derived from this Direct Public Offering will be used for equipment purchases, product
development, marketing expenses, general and administrative expenses and working capital. (See “Use of Proceeds”).
No assurance can be given that the proceeds from this Direct Public Offering will be sufficient to accomplish
our goals. If proceeds from this Direct Public Offering are insufficient, we may be required to seek additional
capital. No assurance can be given that we will be able to obtain such additional capital or, if available, that such
additional capital will be available on terms acceptable to us.
Risk Factors
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the
information included in the “Risk Factors” section of this Prospectus, as well as the other information contained in
this Prospectus, prior to making an investment decision regarding our common stock.
SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following summary financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, as well as the financial statements and notes thereto,
beginning on page F-1of this Prospectus. The Balance Sheet Data and the Statement of Operations Data presented
below is derived from our audited financial statements.
|
|
Balance Sheet Data
As at 9/30/10
|
|
Statement of Operations Data
For the Period from Inception (8/17/10) through 9/30/10
|
|
|
Current assets
Total assets
Total liabilities
Stockholders’ equity
|
$27,987
$40,415
$ ---
$40,415
|
|
Revenues
Cost of goods
Gross profit
Operating expenses
Net loss
Net loss per share
|
$ ---
$ ---
$ ---
$35,361
$(35,361)
$(0.00)
|
|
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks
described below and the other information in this Prospectus before investing in our common stock. The occurrence of
any of the following risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Risks Related to Our Business
Our lack of operating history makes it difficult to predict our future operating results.
We were incorporated on August 17, 2010. For the period from our inception through September 30, 2010,
we had no revenues and incurred a net loss of $(35,361). (See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation”).
Because we have a limited operating history, it is difficult to forecast our future operating results. Additionally,
our operations will continue to be subject to risks inherent in the establishment of a new business, including, among other
factors, efficiently deploying our capital, developing new product offerings, developing and implementing our marketing
campaigns and strategies and developing awareness and acceptance of our specialty food products. Our ability to
generate future revenues will be dependent on a number of factors, including overall demand for our specialty food
products and market competition. As with any investment in a company with a limited operating history, ownership of
our common stock involves a high degree of risk and is not recommended if an investor cannot reasonably bear the risk
of a total loss of his investment.
The report of our independent auditors indicates uncertainty concerning our ability to continue as a going concern
and this may impair our ability to raise capital to fund our business plan.
In its opinion on our financial statements for the period ended September 30, 2010, our independent auditors
raised substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We cannot assure you that this will not impair
our ability to raise capital on attractive terms. Additionally, we cannot assure you that we will ever achieve significant
revenues and therefore remain a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result
from the outcome of this uncertainty.
If we do not obtain additional funding for our operations, the value of our common stock could be adversely affected.
As of September 30, 2010, we had $27,987 in working capital and cash of $22,353. Currently, we possess
approximately $37,000 in cash. Given the current structure of our business, we estimate that our cash position is
sufficient to support our operations for at least the next six months. However, in order for us to expand our current
operations and implement our full business plan, we will be required to obtain additional capital, including through our
Direct Public Offering hereunder, or employ other financing alternatives. No assurance can be given that we will be able
to obtain additional funds. In addition, in the absence of the receipt of additional funding, we may be required to scale
back current operations or cease operations completely.
Changes in general economic and political conditions affect consumer spending and may harm our revenues,
operating results and/or liquidity.
The United States is currently in a recession. Our management believes that these weak general economic
conditions will continue through 2010 and well into 2011. The ongoing impacts of rising unemployment and financial
market weakness may further exacerbate current economic conditions. As the economy continues to display weakness,
customers may reduce their level of discretionary spending. A decrease in spending due to lower consumer discretionary
income or consumer confidence in the economy could impact the amount consumers spend on specialty food items, like
those produced by our company. These circumstances would likely decrease our revenues and negatively affect our
operating results. Additionally, we believe there is a risk that, if the current negative economic conditions persist for a
long period of time and become more pervasive, consumers might make long-lasting changes to their spending behavior,
including the purchase of fewer specialty food items, on a more permanent basis.
We may be unable to obtain sufficient capital to pursue our growth strategy.
Currently, we do not have sufficient financial resources to implement our complete business plan. Specifically,
we lack the capital to expand quickly our specialty food product distribution channels and to make acquisitions of
existing food companies. There is no assurance that we will be able to generate revenues that are sufficient to sustain
our operations, nor can we assure you that we will be able to obtain additional sources of financing in order to satisfy
our working capital needs.
If we are unable to retain key personnel, it will have an adverse affect on our business; we do not maintain “key
man” life insurance policies on key personnel.
Our operations have been, and will continue to be, dependent on the efforts of David Loflin, our President, and
Waddell D. Loflin, our Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary. The development of our business is dependent
on retaining the services of Messrs. Loflin and Loflin. As we cannot afford to hire management personnel, the loss of
these persons would adversely affect our products and business and could have a materially adverse effect on our
business, operating results and financial condition.
We have not purchased “key man” life insurance policies. Even if we were to obtain “key man” insurance for
Messrs. Loflin and Loflin, of which there is no assurance, the amount of such policies may not be sufficient to cover
losses experienced by us as a result of the loss of these persons.
Our management serves us on a part-time basis and conflicts may arise.
David Loflin and Waddell D. Loflin perform employee-like services for our company on a part-time basis. Each
of these persons has committed to working up to 30 hours per week for the benefit of our company. These persons have
not been compensated for their services to date and have agreed to work for no cash remuneration, until such time as we
generate sufficient revenues for the payment of salaries to our management. We have not entered into employment
agreements with either of these persons; we expect to enter into employment agreements with these persons at an as-yet
determined time in the future. These individuals have other work-related responsibilities outside of our company. While
each will seek to devote sufficient time to allow us to operate on a basis that is beneficial to our shareholders, this goal
may not be accomplished and our operating results may be negatively impacted by the unavailability of these key
personnel.
Our officers do not have employment agreements with us and could cease working for us at any time, thereby causing
us to cease our operations.
Our officers do not have employment agreements with us. In the absence of employment agreements with a
restrictive covenant on their part, these persons could leave us at any time and commence working for a competing
company. Accordingly, the continued services of our officers cannot be assured. If any of our officers were to cease
working for us, we might be forced to cease operations.
Our business plan is not based on independent market studies, so we cannot assure you that our strategy will be
successful.
We have not commissioned any independent market studies concerning any facet of the specialty food industry.
Rather, our plans for implementing our business strategy and achieving profitability are based on the experience,
judgment and assumptions of our management and upon other available information concerning the specialty food
industry in the U.S. If our management’s assumptions prove to be incorrect, we will not be successful in our efforts.
We will need to attract additional management personnel.
We believe our current officers will be able to satisfy our senior management needs for the initial phase of our
business plan. Thereafter, we will be required to hire additional executive officers and other staff members with
experience in the food industry and in general business matters. Our inability to hire or retain experienced personnel
would severely limit our ability to develop successfully our operations.
If we are unable to manage future expansion effectively, our business may be adversely impacted.
In the future, we may experience rapid growth in operations, which could place a significant strain on our
operations, in general, and our internal controls and other managerial, operating and financial resources, in particular.
If we do not manage future expansion effectively, our business will be harmed. There is, of course, no assurance that we
will experience rapid development in our business.
Potential future acquisitions could be difficult to locate and integrate, divert the attention of key personnel, disrupt
our business, dilute shareholder value and adversely affect our financial results.
As part of our business strategy, we intend to consider acquisitions of existing food-related businesses.
However, we may not find suitable acquisition opportunities. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, any of which could
harm our business, including:
• difficulties in integrating the operations, technologies, products, existing contracts,
accounting processes and personnel of the target company and realizing the anticipated
synergies of the combined businesses;
• difficulties in supporting customers of the target company or assets;
• diversion of financial and management resources from our then-existing operations;
• the price we pay or other resources that we devote to an opportunity may exceed the value
we realize, or the value we could have realized, if we had allocated the purchase price or
other resources to another opportunity;
• potential loss of key employees, customers and strategic alliances from either our current
business or the business of the target company;
• assumption of unanticipated problems or latent liabilities, such as problems with the quality
of the products of the target company; and
• inability to generate sufficient revenue to offset acquisition costs.
Acquisitions also frequently result in the recording of goodwill and other intangible assets which are subject
to potential impairments in the future that could harm our financial results. In addition, if we finance acquisitions by
issuing convertible debt or equity securities, our existing shareholders’ ownership may be diluted. As a result, if we fail
properly to evaluate acquisitions, we may not achieve the anticipated benefits of any such acquisitions, and we may incur
costs in excess of those that we anticipate. The failure to evaluate and execute successfully acquisitions or otherwise
adequately address these risks could materially harm our business and financial results and, in turn, the market price for
our common stock.
We have only a single source for our packaged dry products and a single source for our coffee products.
Currently, we have only a single source for our packaged dry products and a single source for our coffee
products. This circumstance leaves us vulnerable to supply interruptions that are beyond our control. While our
management is attempting to diversify our supply sources, there is no assurance that they will be successful in these
efforts. Prospective investors should understand that any product supply interruption can be expected to have a
materially adverse effect on our operating results and, likely, an adverse effect on the market price for our common stock.
Our company does not own its certified commercial kitchen facility.
For the foreseeable future, we will not own a certified commercial kitchen facility. Rather, we will rent a
certified commercial kitchen facility from a third party. Should this third party fail to maintain the certification of its
commercial kitchen facility, we would be forced to secure the use of another facility. This circumstance could have a
materially adverse effect on our operating results for an indefinite period of time.
We have a small number of customers.
Only one customer delivered a purchase order for our specialty food products during the period from August
17, 2010 (inception), through September 30, 2010. Our failure to increase our customer base would have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our specialty food products are new and do not enjoy name recognition and their regional popularity may not extend
beyond the region.
It will be difficult to generate sales of our specialty food products, because they are new and do not enjoy name
recognition. In addition, our specialty food products are versions of long-standing favorites of the South Louisiana
region and we cannot assure you that this same popularity will extend beyond South Louisiana. Our business will fail,
should we be unable to attract a large number of purchasers of our new products.
Our product liability insurance may not be adequate to pay a damage award against our company.
While our management believes our current product liability insurance coverage is appropriate for our level
of business operations, there can be no assurance that such will be the case. It is possible that our company would be
unable to respond to an award of damages in excess of our policy’s coverage limits. Should a situation arise, it could
result in a materially adverse impact to our then-financial condition.
Competition from other purveyors of food products could adversely affect our revenues and financial condition.
The food business is highly competitive. We expect competition to intensify in the future. Numerous brands
and products compete for retail shelf space and sales, with competition based primarily on price, quality and
convenience. We compete with a significant number of companies of varying sizes, including divisions or subsidiaries
of large, vertically integrated, international companies. A vast majority of our competitors feature broader product lines
and possess substantially greater financial and other resources than does our company. There can be no assurance that
we will be able to compete effectively. A failure to compete effectively will result in diminished revenue and will have
a materially adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
Changes in food costs could negatively impact our results of operations.
The profitability of our specialty food products business is dependent, in part, on our ability to anticipate and
react to changes in the cost of raw products. Any disruption in the supply of needed items due to quality or availability
issues could cause our food costs to fluctuate. Additional factors beyond our control, including adverse weather
conditions and governmental regulation, may affect our cost of raw products. We may not be able to anticipate and react
to these changing costs through our purchasing practices and price adjustments, and the failure to do so could negatively
impact our operating results.
Risks Related to this Offering
As there is no minimum offering hereunder, should only a few persons purchase shares, it is likely that they will lose
their investments.
Our business plan requires us to obtain $300,000 in order for us to implement our full business growth strategy.
Because there is no minimum under this Direct Public Offering, we may not obtain enough capital to implement fully
our business plan. In such an event, it is highly likely that any investment in our company would be lost. In such event,
proceeds from this Direct Public Offering may not be sufficient to meet the objectives we state in this Prospectus, other
corporate objectives that we may set or to avoid a “going concern” modification in future reports of our auditors as to
uncertainty with respect to our ability to continue as a going concern. If we fail to raise sufficient capital, it is expected
that we would be forced to slow the growth of our business.
Investing in our company is a highly speculative investment and could result in the loss of your entire investment.
A purchase of our common stock is highly speculative and involves significant risks. The common stock should
not be purchased by any person who cannot afford the loss of his entire purchase price. The business objectives of our
company are also speculative, and we may be unable to satisfy those objectives. Our shareholders may be unable to
realize a substantial, or any, return on their investments and may lose their entire investments.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Currently, there is no public market for our common stock; there can be no assurance that any public market will
ever develop or that our common stock will be quoted for trading.
Prior to the date of this Prospectus, there has not been any established trading market for our common stock,
and there is currently no public market whatsoever for our securities. We intend to have a market maker file an
application with FINRA on our behalf for the quotation of our common stock on the OTCBB maintained by FINRA
commencing upon the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this Prospectus is a part. There can be no
assurance as to whether a market maker will actually file the application or that, if filed, such application will be accepted
by FINRA. We are not permitted to file such application on our own behalf. If the application is accepted, there can
be no assurances as to whether any market for our shares will develop or the prices at which our common stock will trade.
If the application is accepted, we cannot predict the extent to which investor interest in us will lead to the development
of an active, liquid trading market. Active trading markets generally result in lower price volatility and more efficient
execution of buy and sell orders for investors.
The market price for our common stock may be volatile.
Our common stock is unlikely to be followed by any market analysts and it can be expected that there may be
few institutions that will act as market makers for our common stock. The existence of either of these circumstances
could adversely affect the liquidity and trading price of our common stock. Until our common stock is fully distributed
and an orderly market develops in our common stock, if ever, the price at which it trades is likely to fluctuate
significantly. Prices for our common stock will be determined in the marketplace and may be influenced by many factors,
including the depth and liquidity of the market for shares of our common stock, developments affecting our business,
including the impact of the factors referred to elsewhere in these Risk Factors, investor perception and general economic
and market conditions. No assurances can be given that an orderly or liquid market will ever develop for the shares of
our common stock. Because of the anticipated low price of our common stock, many brokerage firms may not be willing
to effect transactions therein.
In addition, the securities markets have, from time to time, experienced significant price and volume fluctuations
that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also materially
and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Our Board of Directors is authorized to issue shares of preferred stock, which may have rights and preferences
detrimental to the rights of the holders of our common stock.
We are authorized to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.001 par value. As of the date of this
Prospectus, we have not issued any shares of preferred stock. Our preferred stock may bear such rights and preferences,
including dividend and liquidation preferences, as the Board of Directors may fix and determine from time to time. Any
such preferences may operate to the detriment of the rights of the holders of the common stock being offered hereby.
We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock.
We intend to retain earnings, if any, to provide funds for the implementation of our business strategy. We do
not intend to declare or pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. Therefore, there can be no assurance that holders
of our common stock will receive any cash, stock or other dividends on their shares of our common stock, until we have
funds which our Board of Directors determines can be allocated to dividends.
If you purchase shares of our common stock from us in the Direct Public Offering, you will experience substantial
dilution of your investment.
Purchasers of common stock in this Direct Public Offering will suffer substantial and immediate dilution, due
to the lower book value per share of our common stock compared to the purchase price per share of our common stock
in this Direct Public Offering. (See “Dilution”).
Purchasers of common stock hereunder will suffer dilution in their ownership, should our currently outstanding
warrants be exercised by their holders.
Currently, we have outstanding 5,100,000 currently exercisable warrants to purchase a like number of shares
of our common stock. Purchasers of common stock hereunder will suffer dilution in their ownership, to the extent any
of these warrants are exercised by their holders. However, the exact dilution in ownership cannot be predicted by us.
As a public company, we will incur audit fees and legal fees in connection with the preparation of our required
financial reporting under the Exchange Act, which costs could reduce or eliminate our ability to earn a profit.
Following the effective date of our registration statement of which this Prospectus is a part, we will be required
to file periodic reports with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act, including the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder. In order to comply with these requirements, our independent registered public accounting firm will be
required to review our financial statements on a quarterly basis and audit our financial statements on an annual basis.
Moreover, our legal counsel will be required to review and assist in the preparation of such reports. While the fees
charged by these professionals for their services cannot be accurately predicted at this time, it can be expected that these
fees will have a significant impact on our ability to earn a profit. We may be exposed to potential risks resulting from
new requirements under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports
or prevent fraud, our business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported
financial information and the trading price of our common stock, if a market ever develops, could drop significantly.
FINRA sales practice requirements may limit a shareholder’s ability to buy and sell our common stock.
FINRA has adopted rules that relate to the application of the SEC’s “penny stock” rules in trading our securities
and require that a broker-dealer have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer,
prior to recommending the investment. Prior to recommending speculative, low-priced securities to their non-institutional
customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax
status, investment objectives and other information.
Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative, low-priced
securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers
to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may have the effect of reducing the level of trading
activity and liquidity of our common stock. Further, many brokers-dealers charge higher transactional fees for penny
stock transactions. As a result, fewer broker-dealers may be willing to make a market in our common stock, thereby
reducing a shareholder’s ability to resell shares of our common stock.
We anticipate our common stock being quoted on the OTCBB, which may result in limited liquidity and the inability
of our shareholders to maintain accurate price quotations of the common stock.
Until our shares of common stock qualify for inclusion in the NASDAQ system, if ever, the trading of our
common stock, if any, will be in the over-the-counter market which is commonly referred to as the OTCBB, as
maintained by FINRA. As a result, an investor may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations as to,
the price of our common stock.
If a market develops for our common stock, sales of our common stock in reliance upon Rule 144 may depress prices
in that market by a material amount.
All of the outstanding shares of our common stock are “restricted securities” within the meaning of Rule 144
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). As restricted shares, these shares may be resold
only pursuant to an effective registration statement or under the requirements of Rule 144 or other applicable exemptions
from registration under the Securities Act and as required under applicable state securities laws. Rule 144 provides, in
essence, that a person who has held restricted securities for a prescribed period may, under certain conditions, sell every
three months, in brokerage transactions, a number of shares that does not exceed 1% of a company’s outstanding common
stock. The alternative amount of permissible sales, average weekly trading volume during the four calendar weeks prior
to the sale, is not available to our shareholders in that the OTCBB (if and when listed thereon) is not an “automated
quotation system”. Market based volume limitations are not available for securities quoted only over the OTCBB. As
a result of the 2008 revisions to Rule 144, there is no limit on the amount of restricted securities that may be sold by a
non-affiliate (i.e., a shareholder who has not been an officer, director or control person for at least 90 consecutive days)
after the restricted securities have been held by the owner for a period of one year. A sale under Rule 144 or under any
other exemption from the Securities Act, if available, or pursuant to registration of shares of common stock of present
shareholders, may have a depressive effect upon the price of the common stock in any market that may develop.
Any trading market that may develop for our common stock may be restricted by virtue of state securities “Blue Sky”
laws, which prohibit trading absent compliance with individual state laws; these restrictions may make it difficult or
impossible to sell shares of our common stock in those states.
There is no public market for our common stock and there can be no assurance that any public market will
develop in the foreseeable future. Transfer of our common stock may also be restricted under the securities laws or
securities regulations promulgated by various states and foreign jurisdictions (commonly referred to as “Blue Sky” laws).
Absent compliance with such individual state laws, our common stock may not be traded in such jurisdictions. Because
the securities registered hereunder have not been registered for resale under the “Blue Sky” laws of any state, the holders
of such shares and persons who desire to purchase them in any trading market that might develop in the future, should
be aware that there may be significant state “Blue Sky” law restrictions upon the ability of investors to sell the securities
and of purchasers to purchase the securities. These restrictions prohibit the secondary trading of our common stock.
We currently do not intend and may not be able to qualify our common stock for resale in the approximately 17 states
which do not offer “manual exemptions” and require shares to be qualified before they can be resold by our shareholders.
Accordingly, investors should consider the secondary market for our securities to be a limited one.
Any market that develops in shares of our common stock will be subject to the “penny stock” restrictions which will
create a lack of liquidity and make trading difficult or impossible.
SEC Rule 15g-9 establishes the definition of a “penny stock”, for purposes relevant to us, as any equity security
that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to a
limited number of exceptions. It is likely that our common stock will be considered a “penny stock” for the immediately
foreseeable future. This classification severely and adversely affects the market liquidity for our common stock. For any
transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the penny stock rules require that a broker-dealer approve a person’s
account for transactions in penny stocks and the broker-dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the
transaction setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.
In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker-dealer must obtain financial
information and investment experience and objectives of the person and make a reasonable determination that the
transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and that the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in
financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.
The broker-dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared
by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form, sets forth:
• the basis on which the broker-dealer made the suitability determination; and
• that the broker-dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the
transaction.
Disclosure also must be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in
secondary trading and commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current
quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock
transactions. Finally, monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the
account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.
Because of these regulations, broker-dealers may not wish to engage in the above-referenced necessary
paperwork and disclosures and/or may encounter difficulties in their attempt to sell shares of our common stock, which
may affect the ability of selling shareholders or other holders to sell their shares in the secondary market and have the
effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market. These additional sales practice and disclosure
requirements could impede the sale of our common stock, if and when our common stock becomes publicly traded. In
addition, the liquidity for our common stock may decrease, with a corresponding decrease in the price of our common
stock. Our common stock, in all probability, will be subject to such penny stock rules for the foreseeable future and our
shareholders will, in all likelihood, find it difficult to sell their common stock. (See “Penny Stock” under “Plan of
Distribution”).
The elimination of monetary liability against our directors, officers and employees under Nevada law and the
existence of indemnification rights in favor of our directors, officers and employees may result in substantial
expenditures by our company and may discourage lawsuits against our directors, officers and employees.
Our Articles of Incorporation contain a specific provision that eliminates the liability of directors for monetary
damages to our company and our shareholders. Further, we intend to give such indemnification to our directors and
officers to the extent provided by Nevada law. We may also have contractual indemnification obligations under
employment agreements with our executive officers. The foregoing indemnification obligations could result in our
incurring substantial expenditures to cover the cost of settlement or damage awards against directors and officers, which
we may be unable to recoup. These provisions and resultant costs may also discourage our company from bringing a
lawsuit against directors and officers for breaches of their fiduciary duties and may similarly discourage the filing of
derivative litigation by our shareholders against our directors and officers, even though such actions, if successful, might
otherwise benefit our company and our shareholders.
We have been advised that, in the opinion of the SEC, indemnification for liabilities arising under federal
securities laws is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event
that a claim for indemnification against these types of liabilities, other than the payment by us of expenses incurred or
paid by a director, officer or controlling person in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding, is asserted
by a director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, we will (unless, in the
opinion of our counsel, the matter has been settled by controlling precedent) submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction,
the question whether indemnification by us is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be
governed by the final adjudication of such issue. The legal process relating to this matter, if it were to occur, is likely
to be very costly and may result in us receiving negative publicity, either of which factors are likely to materially reduce
the market for, and price of, our common stock, if such a market ever develops.
THE FOREGOING LIST OF RISK FACTORS DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE A COMPLETE EXPLANATION
OF THE RISKS INVOLVED IN THIS OFFERING. PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD READ THE ENTIRE
PROSPECTUS BEFORE DECIDING TO INVEST IN LOUISIANA FOOD COMPANY.
DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE
As a result of there being no established public market for our common stock, the offering price and other terms
and conditions relative to our common stock have been arbitrarily determined by our Board of Directors and do not bear
any relationship to assets, earnings, book value or any other objective criteria of value. In addition, no investment
banker, appraiser or other independent third party has been consulted concerning the offering price for the common stock
or the fairness of the offering price used for the common stock.
USE OF PROCEEDS
Direct Public Offering
This offering is being made as a Direct Public Offering, without the involvement of underwriters or
broker-dealers. The table below sets forth the use of proceeds from this Direct Public Offering, assuming (a) 25%, (b)
50%, (c) 75% and (d) 100% of the common stock offered in this Direct Public Offering is sold.
|
Item of Expenditure
|
|
Assuming
25% Sold
|
|
Assuming
50% Sold
|
|
Assuming
75% Sold
|
|
Assuming
100% Sold
|
|
Equipment purchases
Product development
Marketing expenses
General and administrative expenses
Working capital
|
|
$10,000
5,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
|
|
$ 10,000
10,000
75,000
30,000
25,000
|
|
$ 25,000
15,000
100,000
35,000
50,000
|
|
$ 30,000
25,000
150,000
40,000
55,000
|
|
Total
|
|
$75,000
|
|
$150,000
|
|
$225,000
|
|
$300,000
|
The foregoing statement of anticipated use of proceeds is subject to change by our management, depending on
current market conditions and other factors.
Assuming 100,000 shares (10%) of the common stock offered in this Direct Public Offering are sold, we
anticipate that the proceeds ($30,000) would permit us to sustain our current level of operations for the next 12 months.
Assuming all 1,000,000 shares of common stock offered in this Direct Public Offering are sold, we anticipate
that the proceeds ($300,000) would permit us to pursue our complete business plan and to operate for at least the next
12 months.
There can be no assurance that we will derive any funds through this Direct Public Offering. If only a minimal
amount of funds is derived, our management will utilize any such funds in accordance with their best business judgment.
Selling Shareholders
We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of the common stock offered by the Selling Shareholders.
We are registering 8,380,000 of our 25,880,000 currently outstanding shares for resale to provide the holders thereof
with freely tradable securities, but the registration of such shares does not necessarily mean that any of such shares will
be offered or sold by the holders thereof.
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
Direct Public Offering
The 1,000,000 shares of common stock to be offered by us in this Direct Public Offering will be offered for a
period of 180 days from the date of this Prospectus, unless extended by our Board of Directors for an additional 90 days.
There is no minimum number of shares of common stock that must be sold by us for this Direct Public Offering
to proceed and, consequently, we will retain the proceeds from the sale of any of the offered shares. The offering is being
conducted on a self-underwritten, best-efforts basis, which means our officers and directors will attempt to sell the shares
of common stock. This Prospectus will permit our officers and directors to sell the shares directly to the public; these
persons will receive no commission or other remuneration for sales of any shares of common stock sold by them.
After the effective date of the registration statement of which this Prospectus is a part, we intend to advertise,
through print notices, and hold investment meetings in various states where this Direct Public Offering will be registered.
We will not use the Internet to advertise this Direct Public Offering. We will also distribute this Prospectus to potential
investors at meetings and to the friends, family members and business acquaintances of our officers and directors.
In connection with our company’s selling efforts in this Direct Public Offering, our officers and directors will
not register as broker-dealers pursuant to Section 15 of the Exchange Act, but rather will rely upon the “safe harbor”
provisions of SEC Rule 3a4-1, promulgated under the Exchange Act. Generally speaking, Rule 3a4-1 provides an
exemption from the broker-dealer registration requirements of the Exchange Act for persons associated with an issuer
that participate in an offering of the issuer’s securities. None of our officers, directors or promoters is subject to any
statutory disqualification, as that term is defined in Section 3(a)(39) of the Exchange Act. Our officers and directors will
not be compensated in connection with their participation in this Direct Public Offering by the payment of commissions
or other remuneration based either directly or indirectly on transactions in our common stock. None of our officers and
directors is now, nor has been within the past 12 months, a broker or dealer, and none has been, within the past 12
months, an associated person of a broker or dealer. At the end of this Direct Public Offering, our officers and directors
will continue primarily to perform substantial duties for our company or on its behalf otherwise than in connection with
transactions in securities. Neither of these persons will participate in selling an offering of securities for any issuer more
than once every 12 months, other than in reliance on Exchange Act Rule 3a4-1(a)(4)(i) or (iii).
In order to comply with the applicable securities laws of certain states, our common stock will be offered or sold
in a state only if it has been registered or qualified for sale, in which there is available an exemption from such
registration or in which our company has met the qualification requirements. In addition, and without limiting the
foregoing, our company will be subject to applicable provisions, rules and regulations under the Exchange Act with
regard to securities transactions during the period of time when the registration statement of which this Prospectus is a
part is effective.
As of the date of this Prospectus, Louisiana Food Company has 25,880,000 shares of common stock issued and
outstanding. An additional 1,000,000 shares of our common stock are being offered for sale hereunder by our company
at a fixed price of $.30 per share.
Procedures for Subscribing. If you decide to subscribe for any shares of our common stock in this Direct Public
Offering, you must:
• execute and deliver to us a subscription agreement (included in this Prospectus as Exhibit
“A”) for acceptance or rejection; and
• deliver funds to us, in the manner set forth in the subscription agreement.
The subscription agreement requires you to disclose your name, address, telephone number, the number of
shares you are purchasing and the price you are paying for your shares.
Right to Reject Subscriptions. We have the right to accept or reject subscriptions in whole or in part, for any
reason or for no reason. All monies from rejected subscriptions will be returned immediately by us to the subscriber,
without interest or deductions. Subscriptions for shares of our common stock will be accepted or rejected within 48
hours after we receive them.
Selling Shareholders
In August 2010, we issued a total of 18,600,000 shares pursuant to a pre-incorporation agreement, as follows:
• 13,000,000 shares were issued to our President, David Loflin, for certain items of personal
and intangible property, which property was valued by our Board of Directors at $13,000
($.001 per share);
• 5,000,000 shares were issued to our company’s legal counsel and promoter, Newlan &
Newlan, in payment of $10,000 ($.002 per share) of legal services; and
• 600,000 shares were issued to Paul J. Goldman, M.D., for $10,000 ($.01 per share) in cash.
Also in August 2010, we issued an additional 4,500,000 shares of our common stock, as follows:
• 2,000,000 shares were issued to five persons for a total of $20,000 ($.01 per share), in cash.
These shares were issued under five separate securities purchase agreements;
• 2,000,000 shares were issued to a third party consultant under a consulting agreement, in
payment of $10,000 ($.005 per share) of consulting services; and
• 500,000 shares were issued to one of our officers, Waddell D. Loflin, as a retention bonus,
which shares were valued by our Board of Directors at $2,500 ($.005 per share), in the
aggregate.
In September 2010, we issued an additional 2,600,000 shares of our common stock to four persons for a total
of $26,000 ($.01 per share), in cash. These shares were issued under a four separate securities purchase agreements.
In October 2010, 180,000 shares were issued to 24 persons for a total of $3,600 in cash, or $.02 per share.
These shares were issued in a private offering pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act. Each
investor therein represented in writing that he was acquiring the shares for his own account and for investment.
No underwriter participated in the foregoing transactions, and no underwriting discounts or commissions were
paid, nor was any general solicitation or general advertising conducted. The securities bear a restrictive legend and stop
transfer instructions are noted on our stock transfer records.
The common stock offered under this Prospectus by the Selling Shareholders may be sold from time to time
for the account of the Selling Shareholders named in the following table. The table also contains information regarding
each Selling Shareholder’s beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock as of the date of this Prospectus, and
as adjusted to give effect to the sale of the shares offered hereunder.
Other than the relationships described below, none of the Selling Shareholders had or has any material
relationship with our company. None of the Non-affiliate Selling Shareholders is a family member of the current officers
and directors of our company.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of common stock
by the Selling Shareholders as of the date of this Prospectus, as well as the number of shares of common stock covered
by this Prospectus.
|
Prior to this Offering
|
|
After this Offering
|
Name of Selling Shareholder
|
Position, Office
or Other
Material
Relationship
|
# of Shares
Beneficially
Owned
|
%
Bene-ficially
Owned
(1)
|
# of Shares
to be Offered
for the
Account
of the Selling
Shareholder
|
# of Shares
to be
Beneficially
Owned
|
%
to be
Bene-ficially
Owned
(2)
|
David Loflin
Newlan & Newlan (3)
Paul J. Goldman, M.D.
Brad A. Kinder
Douglas V. Martin
Roy M. Brumbaugh
William Huff
Clarence Farmer
Rage Marketing, Inc.
James D. Luneau
L. E. Arnold
FLL Shamrock, LP
Blayne G. St. James
Marcos Villegas
Lacey M. Luneau
Teresa Guerin
Peggy Ojea
Chris Villnurve
Cheryl Villnurve
Martha Rayburn
Donald Rayburn
Angela Hasty
Stephanie Smith
Rebeca Villnurve
Jenifer Cole
Harrison Cole
Lily Cole
Alyson Huff
Jason Huff
Chris Olson
Shelly Scott
Mary Scott
Billy C. Lawrence
Jodi Lawrence
T.J. Haines
Jackie Haines
Fort Worth Diagnostic
Clinic, LLC (10)
|
Officer/Director
Promoter
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
|
15,000,000(4)
7,000,000(4)
780,000(5)
600,000(6)
600,000(6)
600,000(6)
300,000(7)
300,000(7)
2,000,000
120,000(8)
1,200,000(9)
1,200,000(9)
600,000(6)
15,000
10,000
20,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
25,000
5,000
5,000
10,000
10,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
|
48.42%
22.60%
2.52%
1.94%
1.94%
1.94%
*
*
6.46%
*
3.87%
3.87%
1.94%
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
|
1,000,000
1,000,000
600,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
250,000
250,000
1,000,000
100,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
500,000
15,000
10,000
20,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
25,000
5,000
5,000
10,000
10,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
|
14,000,000(4)
6,000,000(5)
180,000(5)
100,000(6)
100,000(6)
100,000(6)
50,000(7)
50,000(7)
1,000,000
20,000(8)
200,000(9)
200,000(9)
100,000(6)
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
|
43.78%
18.76%
*
*
*
*
*
*
3.13%
*
*
*
*
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
|
* Less than 1%.
(1) Based on 30,980,000 shares outstanding, including a total of 5,100,000 unissued shares that underlie currently
exercisable warrants.
(2) Based on 31,980,000 shares outstanding, assuming the sale by us of 1,000,000 shares hereunder and including
a total of 5,100,000 unissued shares that underlie currently exercisable warrants.
(3) Newlan & Newlan is our corporate counsel and a promoter; Newlan & Newlan, including its partners, Lee
Newlan and Eric Newlan, are deemed to be affiliates.
(4) 2,000,000 of these shares are unissued, but underlie currently exercisable warrants.
(5) 180,000 of these shares are unissued, but underlie currently exercisable warrants.
(6) 100,000 of these shares are unissued, but underlie currently exercisable warrants.
(7) 50,000 of these shares are unissued, but underlie currently exercisable warrants.
(8) 20,000 of these shares are unissued, but underlie currently exercisable warrants.
(9) 200,000 of these shares are unissued, but underlie currently exercisable warrants.
(10) This entity is owned by Paul J. Goldman, M.D., one of the other Selling Shareholders.
None of the Selling Shareholders is a broker-dealer or an affiliate of a broker-dealer.
David Loflin, one of our officers and directors, and Newlan & Newlan, our corporate counsel and a promoter,
are Affiliate Selling Shareholders and will be considered to be underwriters for purposes of this offering; the Non-affiliate Selling Shareholders may be deemed to be underwriters. Mr. Loflin’s and Newlan & Newlan’s intentions are
to remain associated with our company regardless of whether or not they sell all or a substantial portion of their holdings
in our company. Mr. Loflin is, nevertheless, offering 7.70% of his shareholder interest (1,000,000 shares out of his
holdings of 13,000,000 shares) in this offering, and Newlan & Newlan is offering 20% of its shareholder interest
(1,000,000 shares out of its holdings of 5,000,000 shares). In the aggregate, 7.73% of all outstanding shares of common
stock is being offered by the Affiliate Selling Shareholders, since sales by Mr. Loflin and Newlan & Newlan would
otherwise be restricted to 1% (or approximately 258,800 shares) of all outstanding shares every three months in
accordance with Rule 144. As officers, control persons, promoters or affiliates of Louisiana Food Company, Mr. Loflin
and Newlan & Newlan may not avail themselves of the provisions of Rule 144(d) which otherwise would permit a
non-affiliate to sell an unlimited number of restricted shares provided that Rule 144’s one-year holding period
requirement is met.
The Selling Shareholders will sell their shares of common stock at a fixed price of $.30 per share until our
common stock is quoted on the OTCBB or another quotation medium and, thereafter, at prevailing market prices, or
privately negotiated prices, with the exception of Mr. Loflin and Newlan & Newlan, who are underwriters, and, as
affiliates, must offer their shares at a fixed price of $.30 per share even if our shares become quoted on the OTCBB or
another quotation medium.
The Selling Shareholders may offer their shares at various times in one or more of the following transactions:
• in any market that might develop;
• in transactions other than market transactions;
• by pledge to secure debts or other obligations;
• purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account; or
• in a combination of any of the above.
The Selling Shareholders may use broker-dealers to sell shares. Should this occur, a broker-dealer would either
receive discounts or commissions from Selling Shareholders or receive commissions from purchasers of shares for whom
they shall have acted as agents. To date, no discussions have been held or agreements reached with any broker-dealer.
No broker–dealer participating in the distribution of the shares covered by this Prospectus may charge commissions in
excess of 8% on any sales made hereunder.
The Affiliate Selling Shareholders who are offering their shares for resale hereunder and any broker-dealers
who act in connection with the sale of the shares hereunder will be considered underwriters of this offering, within the
meaning of the Securities Act, and any commissions they receive and proceeds of any sale of the shares may be deemed
to be underwriting discounts and commissions under the Securities Act.
The Selling Shareholders and any purchasers of our common stock should be aware that any market that
develops in our common stock will be subject to “penny stock” restrictions.
We will pay all expenses incident to the registration, offering and sale of our common stock, other than
commissions or discounts of underwriters, broker-dealers or agents. We have also agreed to indemnify the Selling
Shareholders against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.
This offering by the Selling Shareholders will terminate on the earlier of the:
• date on which the shares are eligible for resale without restrictions pursuant to Rule 144
under the Securities Act; and
• date on which all shares offered by this Prospectus have been sold by the Selling
Shareholders.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors,
officers and controlling persons, we have been advised that, in the opinion, of the SEC, such indemnification is against
public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.
If any of the Selling Shareholders enter into an agreement after the effectiveness of the registration statement
of which this Prospectus is a part to sell all or a portion of their shares to a broker-dealer as principal and the
broker-dealer is acting as underwriter, we will file a post-effective amendment to our registration statement of which this
Prospectus is a part identifying the broker-dealer, providing the required information on the plan of distribution, revising
disclosures in the registration statement as required and filing the agreement as an exhibit to the registration statement.
Until our shares of common stock qualify for inclusion in the NASDAQ system, if ever, the trading of our
common stock, if any, will be in the over-the-counter markets, including the OTCBB, as maintained by FINRA. As a
result, investors may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations as to the price of, our common stock.
Penny Stock
SEC Rule 15g-9 establishes the definition of a “penny stock”, for purposes relevant to us, as any equity security
that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to a
limited number of exceptions. It is likely that our common stock will be considered to be a “penny stock” for the
immediately foreseeable future. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the penny stock rules
require that a broker-dealer approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks and the broker-dealer receive
from the investor a written agreement to the transaction setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be
purchased.
In order to approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker-dealer must obtain financial
information, investment experience and objectives of the investor and make a reasonable determination that the
transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that investor and that the investor has sufficient knowledge and experience
in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.
The broker-dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared
by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form, sets forth the basis on which the broker-dealer
made the suitability determination, and that the broker-dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior
to the transaction.
Disclosure also must be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in
secondary trading and commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current
quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock
transactions. Finally, monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the
account and information on the limited market in penny stocks. The above-referenced requirements may create a lack
of liquidity, making trading difficult or impossible, and accordingly, shareholders may find it difficult to dispose of our
common stock. (See “Risk Factors”).
STATE SECURITIES (BLUE SKY) LAWS
There is no public market for our common stock, and there can be no assurance that any market will develop
in the foreseeable future. Transfer of our common stock may also be restricted under the securities laws and regulations
of various states, commonly referred to as "Blue Sky" laws. Absent compliance with such individual state laws, our
common stock may not be traded in such jurisdictions. Because the securities registered hereunder have not been
registered for resale under the “Blue Sky” laws of any state, the holders of such shares and persons who desire to
purchase them in any trading market that might develop in the future should be aware that there may be significant state
“Blue Sky” law restrictions upon the ability of investors to sell the common stock and of purchasers to purchase the
common stock. Accordingly, investors may not be able to liquidate their investments and should be prepared to hold
the common stock for an indefinite period of time.
The Selling Shareholders may contact us directly to ascertain procedures necessary for compliance with Blue
Sky laws in the applicable states relating to sellers and/or purchasers of our common stock.
We intend to apply for listing in a nationally recognized securities manual which, once published, would provide
us with "manual" exemptions in 33 states, as indicated in CCH Blue Sky Law Desk Reference at Section 6301 entitled
"Standard Manuals Exemptions".
33 states have what is commonly referred to as a "manual exemption" for secondary trading of securities, such
as those to be resold by the Selling Shareholders pursuant to this Prospectus. In these states, so long as we obtain and
maintain a listing in an acceptable manual, secondary trading of our common stock can occur without any filing, review
or approval by state regulatory authorities in these states. These states are: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado,
Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts,
Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma,
Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, Washington, West Virginia and Wyoming. We cannot secure this
listing, and, thus, this qualification, until after the registration statement of which this Prospectus is a part is declared
effective. Once we secure this listing, secondary trading can occur in these states without further action.
We currently do not intend to and may not be able to qualify securities for resale in other states which require
shares to be qualified before they can be resold by our shareholders.
DILUTION
Direct Public Offering
If you purchase shares of our common stock from us in this Direct Public Offering, your investment will be
diluted to the extent of the difference between the public offering price of $.30 per share and the net tangible book value
of our common stock after this offering. Our net tangible book value as of September 30, 2010, was $29,932, or $.001
per share. Net tangible book value per share is equal to total assets minus the sum of total liabilities and intangible assets
divided by the total number of shares outstanding.
Dilution in net tangible book value per share to new investors represents the difference between the amount per
share paid by purchasers of shares of our common stock in this Direct Public Offering and the net tangible book value
per share immediately after completion of this Direct Public Offering. Dilution arises mainly as a result of our arbitrary
determination of the offering price of the common stock being offered.
The tables below illustrate the dilution to new investors, on a pro forma basis, assuming 100%, 75%, 50% and
25% of the common stock offered in our Direct Public Offering is sold.
|
Assuming the Sale of 1,000,000 Shares of Common Stock (100%)
|
|
|
Direct Public Offering price per share. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $0.30
Net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2010. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$0.001
Increase in net tangible book value per share after giving effect to this Direct Public Offering. . . . . . $0.011
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2010. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $0.012
Dilution in net tangible book value per share to new investors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$0.288
|
|
Assuming the Sale of 750,000 Shares of Common Stock (75%)
|
|
|
Direct Public Offering price per share. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $0.30
Net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2010. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$0.001
Increase in net tangible book value per share after giving effect to this Direct Public Offering. . . . . . $0.009
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2010. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $0.01
Dilution in net tangible book value per share to new investors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$0.29
|
|
Assuming the Sale of 500,000 Shares of Common Stock (50%)
|
|
|
Direct Public Offering price per share. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $0.30
Net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2010. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$0.001
Increase in net tangible book value per share after giving effect to this Direct Public Offering. . . . . . $0.006
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2010. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $0.007
Dilution in net tangible book value per share to new investors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$0.293
|
|
Assuming the Sale of 250,000 Shares of Common Stock (25%)
|
|
|
Direct Public Offering price per share. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $0.30
Net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2010. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$0.001
Increase in net tangible book value per share after giving effect to this Direct Public Offering. . . . . . $0.003
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2010. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $0.004
Dilution in net tangible book value per share to new investors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$0.296
|
The price of the current offering is fixed at $0.30 per share. This price is significantly greater than the price paid
by any of our current shareholders, including one of our officers and a promoter. Our current shareholders have paid
an average of approximately $.003 per share, including the value of shares issued in consideration of personal property,
intellectual property and services, which value is $.297 per share lower than the $.30 per share fixed offering price in
this Direct Public Offering.
Selling Shareholders
Non-affiliate Selling Shareholders. With respect to the common stock offered and sold by the Non-affiliate
Selling Shareholders hereunder, purchasers of common stock will likely incur substantial dilution. However, because
the Non-affiliate Selling Shareholders may sell their common stock from time to time at varying prices, we have not
included specific dilution information with respect to such shares.
Affiliate Selling Shareholders. With respect to the common stock offered and sold by the Affiliate Selling
Shareholders hereunder, purchasers of common stock will incur substantial dilution (reference is made to the preceding
tables included under “Direct Public Offering”). This dilution is due to the Affiliate Selling Shareholders’ being required
to sell their shares of common stock at the fixed price of $.30.
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES
General
Our authorized capital stock consists of 50,000,000 shares of common stock, $.001 par value per share, and
5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.001 par value per share. As of the date of this Prospectus, there were 25,880,000
shares of our common stock issued and outstanding, held by 37 holders of record; a total of 5,100,000 shares are reserved
for issuance upon the exercise of a like number of currently exercisable warrants; and there are no shares of preferred
stock issued and outstanding.
Common Stock
The following is a summary of the material rights and restrictions associated with our common stock. This
description does not purport to be a complete description of all of the rights of our shareholders and is subject to, and
is qualified in its entirety by, the provisions of our most current Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, which are included
as exhibits to the registration statement of which this Prospectus is a part.
The holders of our common stock currently have (i) equal ratable rights to dividends from funds legally
available therefore, when, as and if declared by our Board of Directors; (ii) are entitled to share ratably in all of our assets
available for distribution to holders of common stock upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of our
company; (iii) do not have preemptive, subscriptive or conversion rights and there are no redemption or sinking fund
provisions or rights applicable thereto; and (iv) are entitled to one non-cumulative vote per share on all matters on which
shareholders may vote.
Our Bylaws provide that, at all meetings of the shareholders for the election of directors, a plurality of the votes
cast shall be sufficient to elect.
On all other matters, except as otherwise required by Nevada law or our Articles of Incorporation, a majority
of the votes cast at a meeting of the shareholders shall be necessary to authorize any corporate action to be taken by vote
of the shareholders.
A “plurality” means the excess of the votes cast for one candidate over any other. When there are more than
two competitors for the same office, the person who receives the greatest number of votes has a plurality.
Please refer to our Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws and the applicable statutes of the State of Nevada for a
more complete description of the rights and liabilities of holders of our common stock.
Preferred Stock
The following is a summary of the material rights and restrictions associated with our preferred stock. This
description does not purport to be a complete description of all of the rights of our shareholders and is subject to, and
qualified in its entirety by, the provisions of our most current Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, which are included
as exhibits to the registration statement of which this Prospectus is a part.
Our Board of Directors is authorized to determine or alter any or all of the rights, preferences, privileges and
restrictions granted to or imposed upon any wholly unissued series of preferred stock and, within the limitations or
restrictions stated in any resolution or resolutions of our Board of Directors originally fixing the number of shares
constituting any series, to increase or decrease (but not below the number of shares of any such series then outstanding)
the number of shares comprising any such series subsequent to the issue of shares of that series, to set the designation
of any series, and to provide for rights and terms of redemption, conversion, dividends, voting rights, and liquidation
preferences of the shares of any such series.
Anti-Takeover Effects of Our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
Our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws contain certain provisions that may have anti-takeover effects, making
it more difficult for, or preventing, a third party from acquiring control of our company or changing our Board of
Directors and management. According to our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, the holders of our common stock
do not have cumulative voting rights in the election of our directors. The combination of the present ownership by a few
shareholders of a significant portion of our issued and outstanding common stock and lack of cumulative voting makes
it more difficult for other shareholders to replace our Board of Directors or for a third party to obtain control of our
company by replacing our Board of Directors.
Anti-Takeover Effects of Nevada Law
Business Combinations. The “business combination” provisions of Sections 78.411 to 78.444, inclusive, of
the Nevada Revised Statutes, or NRS, prohibit a Nevada corporation with at least 200 stockholders from engaging in
various “combination” transactions with any interested stockholder: for a period of three years after the date of the
transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, unless the transaction is approved by the board of
directors prior to the date the interested stockholder obtained such status; or after the expiration of the three-year period,
unless:
• the transaction is approved by the board of directors or a majority of the voting power held
by disinterested stockholders, or
• if the consideration to be paid by the interested stockholder is at least equal to the highest of:
(a) the highest price per share paid by the interested stockholder within the three years
immediately preceding the date of the announcement of the combination or in the transaction
in which it became an interested stockholder, whichever is higher, (b) the market value per
share of common stock on the date of announcement of the combination and the date the
interested stockholder acquired the shares, whichever is higher, or (c) for holders of preferred
stock, the highest liquidation value of the preferred stock, if it is higher.
A “combination” is defined to include mergers or consolidations or any sale, lease exchange, mortgage, pledge,
transfer or other disposition, in one transaction or a series of transactions, with an "interested stockholder" having: (a)
an aggregate market value equal to 5% or more of the aggregate market value of the assets of the corporation, (b) an
aggregate market value equal to 5% or more of the aggregate market value of all outstanding shares of the corporation,
or (c) 10% or more of the earning power or net income of the corporation.
In general, an “interested stockholder” is a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns (or within
three years, did own) 10% or more of a corporation’s voting stock. The statute could prohibit or delay mergers or other
takeover or change-in-control attempts and, accordingly, may discourage attempts to acquire our company even though
such a transaction may offer our stockholders the opportunity to sell their stock at a price above the prevailing market
price. Our Articles of Incorporation state that we have elected not to be governed by the “business combination”
provisions, therefore such provisions currently do not apply to us. The effect of this business combination law is to
potentially discourage parties interested in taking control of Louisiana Food Company from doing so if our Board of
Directors does not approve.
Control Share Acquisitions
The “control share” provisions of Sections 78.378 to 78.3793, inclusive, of the NRS, which apply only to
Nevada corporations with at least 200 stockholders, including at least 100 stockholders of record who are Nevada
residents, and which conduct business directly or indirectly in Nevada, prohibit an acquirer, under certain circumstances,
from voting its shares of a target corporation’s stock after crossing certain ownership threshold percentages, unless the
acquirer obtains approval of the target corporation’s disinterested stockholders. The statute specifies three thresholds:
one-fifth or more but less than one-third, one-third but less than a majority, and a majority or more, of the outstanding
voting power. Once an acquirer crosses one of the above thresholds, those shares in an offer or acquisition and acquired
within 90 days thereof become “control shares” and such control shares are deprived of the right to vote until
disinterested stockholders restore the right. These provisions also provide that if control shares are accorded full voting
rights and the acquiring person has acquired a majority or more of all voting power, all other stockholders who do not
vote in favor of authorizing voting rights to the control shares are entitled to demand payment for the fair value of their
shares in accordance with statutory procedures established for dissenters’ rights.
Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid any dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain future
earnings, if any, to finance the expansion of our business. As a result, we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends
in the foreseeable future.
Warrants
We currently have outstanding 5,100,000 warrants to purchase a like number of shares our common stock at
an exercise price $.10. These warrants are exercisable for two years from their respective dates of issuance, variously
from August 2012 to September 2012.
BUSINESS
General
We incorporated in the State of Nevada on August 17, 2010, under the name Louisiana Food Company. Our
corporate office is located at 917 Third Street, Norco, Louisiana 70079; our corporate web site is www.lafoodco.com.
It is our company’s objective to focus on developing and commercializing food-related business opportunities
in the State of Louisiana, whether eating establishments or Louisiana-based specialty food products. Our company is
committed to locating and developing these business opportunities throughout Louisiana and, when appropriate,
expanding these business opportunities beyond Louisiana’s borders.
Background
South Louisiana, where our company is based, more than any other part of the United States, holds its cuisine
near and dear to its heart. The region’s cuisine is the embodiment of the cultures and traditions brought by its settlers
from Europe, Africa, the Caribbean and Canada and shared, neighbor to neighbor, over hundreds of years.
It is in this mysterious intertwining of cultures and traditions that our company’s founder, David Loflin, finds
his heritage – he is a Cajun, born and raised in South Louisiana.
It seems most have heard of Cajun and Creole cuisine, though few actually are able to recite their respective
origins. Simply put, Cajun cuisine is rooted in the kitchens of rural Southern Louisiana and Creole cuisine is rooted in
the more sophisticated kitchens of New Orleans. Our company is dedicated to bringing the best foods of Louisiana to
the supermarkets and specialty shops throughout the United States.
Current Status
We have established three lines of “Certified” Louisiana specialty food products: (1) packaged dry products,
(2) sauce products and (3) coffee products. We market our packaged dry products and sauce products under the
“Louisiana Food Company” trade name; we market our coffee products under the “Tchoupitoulas Coffee Company”
trade name.
Shortly following our incorporation in August 2010, our management located a small specialty food company,
Cajun Fry Co., Inc., located in Pierre Part, Louisiana, that produces authentic Louisiana specialty food products. We
have entered into an oral agreement pursuant to which Cajun Fry produces, on our behalf, our packaged dry products
in bulk. We currently produce our own sauce products in our Norco, Louisiana, commercial kitchen facility. We have
entered into an oral agreement with Covington, Louisiana-based New Orleans Roast, LLC, whereby it produces, on our
behalf, our coffee products in bulk.
In September 2010, we received the first purchase order for our specialty food products. In October 2010, we
began to ship our specialty food products.
“Certified” Louisiana
Because each of our products is produced locally in Louisiana, we applied for, and have been granted, a license
by the Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry to affix, as appropriate, the Department’s “Certified” logos to
our products, as follows:
• “A Product of Louisiana: Certified”;
• “A Product of Louisiana: Certified Cajun”; and
• “A Product of Louisiana: Certified Creole”.
Our Products
We offer the following packaged dry products, each of which, when prepared according to package directions,
makes four servings:
Jammin’ Jambalaya (Mild, Cajun Hot, Creole and Vegetarian)
A delicious, authentic taste of South Louisiana.
Acadiana Dirty Rice
A gift from the Heart of Cajun country.
Bayou Moon Jamasta (Mild and Hot)
It reflects the cultural mix that is the French Quarter.
Breaux Bridge Etouffee
Acadian pioneer Firmin Breaux would be so proud.
Fais do-do Gumbo
It’ll have you dancing by the bottom of the bowl!
Bon Temps Cajun Fry
Mardi Gras anytime you feel like it!
We offer the following sauce products:
Très Rouge Pasta Sauce
An Italian marinara sauce with a dash of New Orleans.
Fidèles Creole Sauce
A faithful Creole-style sauce that’s great over rice
We offer the following coffee products:
Dark Roast Coffee (Whole Bean and Ground)
Medium Roast Coffee (Whole Bean and Ground)
Dark Roast Decaffeinated Coffee (Whole Bean and Ground)
Chicory Blend (Whole Bean and Ground)
Our Association with Edible Enterprises
In September 2010, we entered into a lease for our corporate headquarters in Norco, Louisiana. We selected
this location for our headquarters, inasmuch as the facility (the “Edible Facility”) is owned and operated by Edible
Enterprises, a food technology incubator established by the River Parish Community Development Corporation
(“RPCDC”). Our management believes that the Edible Enterprises facility offers our company extremely economical
access to FDA-approved commercial kitchen facilities, as well as food packaging, distribution and marketing
consultation.
The Norco Community Economic Development Foundation, in conjunction with the RPCDC, supports Edible
Enterprises. Edible Enterprises operates in accordance with its Mission Statement: “Our mission is to provide culinary
entrepreneurs with all the tools necessary to develop and successfully market specialty food products, thereby creating
jobs and positively impacting the economic development of the River Parishes [generally, the Parishes from Baton Rouge
and New Orleans] and Greater New Orleans regions.”
The Edible Facility contains approximately 12,000 square feet and includes an FDA-approved commercial
kitchen, a processing kitchen and freezer, cooler and dry storage. The Edible Facility also contains an adequate shipping
and receiving area. We rent the FDA-approved kitchen at the Edible Facility at the rate of $20 per hour, for the
packaging of our dry products and coffee products and the production of our sauce products. We also lease a small office
at the Edible Facility.
Our Competitive Strengths and Weaknesses
We believe our company has the following competitive strengths:
• Our products are high-quality, good-tasting and affordable;
• We have low overhead costs;
• Our product storage costs are included in our office lease;
• We have implemented strong customer service and distributor relations programs; and
• Our online store is easily navigated by our customers and our distributors.
We believe our company has the following competitive weaknesses:
• Our products are new and do not enjoy brand name recognition;
• Our company possesses limited capital; and
• Our company has limited personnel.
Industry Overview
Packaged Dry Goods and Sauces. According to National Association for the Specialty Food Trade’s annual
State of the Specialty Food Industry 2009, the specialty food industry represented more than $60 billion in U.S. sales,
with 80% of these sales being made through retailers, including supermarkets, natural food stores and gourmet shops.
Coffee. We believe that the specialty coffee industry will continue to enjoy strong demand for its products.
Several factors will contribute to this sustained demand for specialty coffee, including: consumer awareness of specialty
coffee, due to its increasing availability; increased quality differentiation over commercial-grade coffees by consumers;
and ease of preparation of specialty coffees resulting from the increased use of automatic drip coffee makers and home
espresso machines.
Product Procurement and Production
Packaged Dry Goods and Sauces. Shortly following our incorporation in August 2010, our management
located a small specialty food company, Cajun Fry Co., Inc., located in Pierre Part, Louisiana, that produces authentic
Louisiana specialty food products. We have entered into an oral agreement pursuant to which Cajun Fry produces, on
our behalf, our packaged dry products in bulk. We, then, package and sell these dry products under our “Louisiana Food
Company” brand name.
We currently produce our own sauce products in the Edible Facility and market them under our “Louisiana Food
Company” brand name.
Coffee. We have entered into an oral agreement with Covington, Louisiana-based New Orleans Roast, LLC,
whereby this company produces, on our behalf, our coffee products in bulk. We, then, package and sell these coffee
products under our “Tchoupitoulas Coffee Company” brand name. “Tchoupitoulas” is pronounced “chop-uh-too-lus”.
Quality Control
We use only first quality ingredients for our specialty food products. Our officers will assure strict adherence
to our production procedures and quality standards for all products manufactured by us. These persons intend also to
monitor production procedures and quality standards at each of the facilities from which we purchase, in bulk, our
specialty food products. However, currently, we do not have a contractual right to inspect or monitor these third-party
production facilities.
Ingredients
Packaged Dry Goods and Sauces. We use, and our suppliers use, only the best available ingredients in
manufacturing our packaged dry products and coffee products. While all necessary ingredients are available from
numerous independent suppliers locally, these ingredients are subject to fluctuations in price attributable to a number
of factors, including weather conditions during the growing and harvesting seasons. At this time, we do not anticipate
any material restrictions on availability or shortages of ingredients that would have a significant impact on the production
of our sauces.
Coffee. The supplier of our bulk coffee products procures only the highest quality arabica beans available from
the world’s coffee-producing regions through wholesale vendors. We believe this supplier and its sources of whole bean
coffee to be reliable, in terms of both availability of supply and consistency of product quality.
Charter Independent Distributor Program
With the backdrop of today’s sluggish economy and with the knowledge that Americans are resourceful, our
management created our Charter Independent Distributor Program. This program is designed to be a low-entry-cost
opportunity for individuals and small businesses to increase their monthly cash flow, by owning and operating a
Louisiana Food Company distributorship on either a full-time or part-time basis.
Under this program, for an initial, up-front investment of $3,000, an individual or small business becomes a
Charter Independent Distributor of our company’s products. For this initial investment, the distributor is shipped enough
product inventory, product displays and signage for the establishment of 10 retail (display) locations. Distributors
reorder our products through our company’s secure online store that is a part of our website (www.lafoodco.com).
We have not yet secured a Charter Independent Distributor. However, due to the strong response from our first
advertising efforts, our management believes we will begin to secure Charter Independent Distributors during October
2010.
Online Store
General. As a part of our website (www.lafoodco.com), we have created an online store, through which
customers are able to purchase all of our specialty food products. In addition, we have created a password-protected
section of our online store, through which our distributors may reorder products.
Convenient Shopping. Our online store is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week to all Internet users. This
online store enables us to market our specialty food products in all areas. Through our planned Internet-based advertising
program, we hope to attract an ever-increasing number of potential customers to our online store. We believe that the
convenience of our online shopping experience and the quality of our products will cause first-time customers to become
repeat customers.
Customer Service. We have established an e-mail based customer service program, by which customers are
able to resolve order and product questions. In addition, it is our company’s policy to make all of our customers satisfied
with their purchases.
Paying for Orders. To pay for orders, a consumer must use a credit card, which is authorized during the
checkout process. Charges are assessed against the card when the order is placed. Our online store uses available
security technologies, including 128-bit encoding encryption technology, to assure our customers of transactional
security.
Distribution and Marketing
Promotion of Products. We intend to distribute our specialty food products throughout the United States. To
achieve this objective, we have begun to implement a multi-faceted distribution and marketing strategy with respect to
our lines of specialty food products. This distribution and marketing strategy includes the methods discussed below.
Internet Advertising. We have begun to expend funds in advertising our products over the Internet via
established Internet advertising systems, including Google AdSense®. Our management anticipates that this Internet
advertising will drive customer traffic to our website, which, we believe, will translate into sales of our specialty food
products directly from our online store. We have also begun to advertise over the Internet for participants in our Charter
Independent Distributor Program. To date, we have only advertised our Charter Independent Distributor Program on
free web sites, including the popular Craig’s List web site. Due to the strong response from potential distributors to this
advertising strategy, our management has determined to delay the use of for-pay advertising options, which include local
newspapers and established Internet advertising systems.
Charter Independent Distributor Program. We expect this program will be the most dynamic of our marketing
strategies. As we attract Charter Independent Distributors through our advertising, we expect our product sales to
increase. Each Charter Independent Distributor pays $3,000 for the first supply of products, retail displays and signage,
then reorders products through our online store. These Charter Independent Distributors then utilize their existing
contacts to place our specialty food products in retail locations. These distributors have non-exclusive rights to sell our
products in their respective territories. We have not yet secured a Charter Independent Distributor, although our
management believes we will begin to do so during October 2010.
National Retail Accounts. We plan also to distribute our products directly to national retail accounts based on
purchase order relationships. These accounts would include grocery stores, convenience stores, retail drug stores and
specialty food stores. We intend to pursue this mode of distribution beginning in January 2011.
Point-of-Purchase (POP) Materials. Initially, all of our specialty food products will be placed in custom
display stands and accompanied by signage intended to attract the attention of shoppers and to promote further our
“Louisiana Food Company” packaged dry products and sauce products, as well as our “Tchoupitoulas Coffee Company”
products. We intend to enhance our current POP materials by developing new promotional items on a periodic basis.
Transportation. To transport our specialty food products, we contract with independent trucking companies
to transport our products from our Edible Facility to distributors. Distributors then re-stock and merchandise our
products at their established retail outlets.
Future Brands
Our management has developed brand concepts that we intend to develop in the future, as funds become
available for such efforts. These brands include Parkson FoodsTM, which has been reserved for locally-produced
Louisiana food products that we develop or discover and that are not a match for the “Louisiana Food Company” brand
name.
Insurance
We have purchased a product liability insurance policy that provides $1,000,000 in coverage. Our management
believes this policy amount to be appropriate for our current level of operations.
Competition
Packaged Dry Goods and Sauces. The food business is highly competitive. We expect competition to intensify
in the future. In our chosen industry segments, numerous brands and products compete for shelf space and sales, with
competition based primarily on price, quality and convenience. We compete with a significant number of companies
of varying sizes, including divisions or subsidiaries of large, vertically integrated, international companies. A vast
majority of our competitors have broader product lines, as well as substantially greater financial and other resources
available to them. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete effectively. A failure to compete
effectively will result in diminished revenue and will have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results
and financial condition.
Coffee. The coffee market, in general, and the specialty coffee market, in particular, is highly competitive. We
believe the specialty coffee market niche is one that depends heavily on brand presence for sustainable success. We
attempt to compete within the industry by promoting our interesting brand name, Tchoupitoulas Coffee Company, as well
as the superior taste and quality of our coffee, rather than the price of our products. In retail outlets, such as
supermarkets, our products compete directly with large purveyors of specialty and non-specialty coffees that have
established brand names and retail shelf presence. On the Internet, at least initially, it will be difficult for us to attract
a significant number of purchasers. We may not be successful in attracting retail customers for our coffee products.
Regulatory Matters
The production and marketing of our specialty food products are subject to the rules and regulations of various
Federal, state and local health agencies, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). Regulations apply
to many aspects of our business, including our products and their ingredients, manufacturing, safety, labeling,
transportation, recycling, advertising and sale. For example, our products, and their manufacturing, labeling, marketing
and sale in the U.S. are subject to various aspects of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Federal Trade
Commission Act, the Lanham Act, state consumer protection laws and state warning and labeling laws. The FDA also
regulates labeling of our products. From time to time, we may receive notification of various technical labeling or
ingredient reviews with respect to our products. Currently, we and, to our knowledge, our suppliers are in compliance
with all applicable laws and regulations as they relate to our products. As our product offerings expand, we intend to
establish a compliance program to ensure compliance with production, marketing and labeling regulations.
We are also subject to the laws and regulations applicable to business operations, such as business licensing
requirements, health department standards, income taxes and payroll taxes. In this regard, there are no regulatory
notifications or actions currently outstanding against us or, to our knowledge, Edible Enterprises.
Intellectual Property
We regard our trademarks, service marks, business know-how and proprietary recipes as having significant
value and as being an important factor in the marketing of our specialty food products. Our policy is to establish, enforce
and protect our intellectual property rights using the intellectual property laws.
We are the owner of the following trademarks: Louisiana Food CompanyTM, Tchoupitoulas Coffee CompanyTM
and Parkson FoodsTM. In the near future, we intend to file for registration of these trademarks with the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office.
We also own an array of proprietary recipes that we use, or intend to use, in our business.
Description of Property
Our approximately 400 square-foot leased offices are located within the Edible Facility at 917 Third Street,
Norco, Louisiana 70079. Our monthly rent is $200, under a one-year lease expiring in October 2011. Should additional
space may be required as we expand our operations, we expect that such space would be available within the Edible
Facility. We currently do not own any real property.
Employees
We currently have no employees other than our President and Vice President. Our business development,
corporate administration and business operations are overseen directly by our President. Our Vice President oversees
record keeping and financial reporting functions. We intend to hire a small number of employees, at such times as our
business conditions warrant. We have used, and, in the future, expect to use, the services of certain outside consultants
and advisors as needed, on a consulting basis.
Company Website
Our company’s corporate website can be found at www.lafoodco.com. As a public company, we will make
available free of charge at this website all of our reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act, including our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and our current reports
on Form 8-K. These reports will be made available on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after their filing
with, or furnishing to, the SEC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Cautionary Statement
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the balance sheet as of September 30,
2010, and the financial statements for the period August 17, 2010 (inception), to September 30, 2010, included elsewhere
in this Prospectus. The results shown herein are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future
periods.
This discussion contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on our
management’s current expectations with respect to future events, financial performance and operating results, which
statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in
this Prospectus. The risks and uncertainties discussed herein could cause our actual results to differ from the results
contemplated by these forward-looking statements. We urge you to consider carefully the information set forth in this
Prospectus under “Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors”.
General
We are a development-stage company incorporated in the State of Nevada on August 17, 2010. We are in the
business of developing and exploiting food-related business opportunities in the State of Louisiana. To date, we have
developed a line of packaged specialty food products, a line of specialty sauces and a line of specialty coffee products.
We sell these specialty food product lines to distributors, directly to retailers and directly to consumers over the Internet.
Please refer to the cautionary statement above, which addresses forward-looking statements made by us.
Overview
While we are a business in the early-stage of development, we have begun to derive revenues from our
operations. Our current focus is on (1) sales to established food distributors, (2) developing our Charter Independent
Distributor Program and (3) sales through our web site, www.lafoodco.com.
In order to accelerate the growth of our business, we will need to obtain additional capital from this Direct
Public Offering or from another source or sources. We intend to apply additional capital, as and if obtained, to the
expansion of our Charter Independent Distributor Program, the pursuit of nation retail accounts and to the expansion of
sales through our web site, primarily through Internet advertising strategies.
Recent Developments
Since our inception (August 17, 2010), we have sold a total of 5,380,000 shares of our common stock for a total
of $55,600 in cash. 5,200,000 of these shares were sold for $.01 per share, for a total of $52,000; 180,000 of these shares
were sold for $.02 per share, for a total of $3,600.
Principal Factors Affecting Our Financial Performance
Our operating results are primarily affected by the following factors:
• our ability to maintain, on commercially reasonable terms, the supply of our packaged dry
products and our coffee products;
• our ability to expand the channels of distribution for our specialty food products;
• our ability to attract new and repeat customers to our online store; and
• our ability to contain our costs of goods sold and maintain our law overheard.
Based on our current business plan, we expect to incur operating losses for at least the first two quarters of
Fiscal 2011. However, because our specialty food products are new, we cannot predict the levels of our sales during
Fiscal 2011.
To date, we have sold our products to only a small number of customers. We do not have a formal relationship
with any of our customers and they may, in their sole discretion and without penalty, cease purchasing our specialty food
products. Our only other channel of distribution is through our website, which has generated only a small level of sales
revenues.
We have a single source for packaged food products and a single source for our coffee products. Each of these
suppliers is located within 60 miles of our production, packaging and distribution location in Norco, Louisiana. We have
not entered into any formal supply agreements with these suppliers. We are required to pay in full for inventory
purchased from these suppliers, upon our receipt of their shipments. If the prices charged by these suppliers increase
and we are not able to pass on the increased prices to our customers, then our margins would be reduced, which would,
in turn, adversely affect our future profitability.
Results of Operations
For the Period from August 17, 2010 (inception) to September 30, 2010. During the Period from August 17,
2010 (inception) to September 30, 2010 (the “Current Period”), we generated no revenues from sales of our specialty
food products. During the Current Period, we received the first purchase order for our specialty food products.
However, due to the fact that the Current Period ended between the date of receipt of this purchase order and the date
on which the order shipped, the purchase order amount, $8,280, does not appear on our September 30, 2010, statement
of operations.
For the Current Period, we incurred a net loss of $35,361. Of the $35,361 in expenses for the Current Period,
$2,500 is attributable to the issuance of 500,000 shares of our common stock to one of our officers as a retention bonus,
$20,000 is attributable to the issuance of shares of our common stock in payment of services to third parties and $3,276
is attributable to the issuance of warrants for services to an officer and a third party. A total of 2,000,000 shares of
common stock, valued at $10,000 for financial reporting purposes, were issued to third-party consultants and 5,000,000
shares of common stock, valued at $10,000 for financial reporting purposes, were issued in payment of legal services.
By issuing common stock in payment of these necessary services, we were able to preserve our available cash. While
we do not expect that we will issue common stock in payment of services during the remainder of 2010, it is possible
that, if we lack the cash needed to obtain necessary services, we would issue shares of common stock in payment thereof.
Our cash expenses during the Current Period related primarily to normal start-up costs and costs associated with the
development of our specialty food products, including label design costs.
Plan of Operations
Our Plan of Operations, which is detailed in the following paragraphs, generally involves the development of
distribution channels for our specialty food products, as well as our locating food-related business opportunities in the
State of Louisiana.
Presently, we offer the following specialty food products (each being described under “Business” herein):
Packaged Dry Products: Jammin’ Jambalaya, Acadiana Dirty Rice, Bayou Moon Jamasta, Breaux
Bridge Etouffee, Fais do-do Gumbo and Bon Temps Cajun Fry.
Sauce Products: Trés Rouge Pasta Sauce and Fidéles Creole Sauce.
Coffee Products: Dark Roast, Medium Roast, Dark Roast (Decaf) and Chicory Blend.
A portion of funds that we obtain in the future, including through this Direct Public Offering, will be applied
to the expansion of our distribution channels. Specifically, we intend to expend funds in advertising for participants in
our Charter Independent Distributor Program. Our advertising will be done in local newspapers around the United States
and over the Internet via one or more of the existing Internet advertising systems, such as Google AdSense®.
Additionally, we intend to use Internet advertising to entice retail consumers to purchase our specialty food products
directly from our online store that is a part of our web site, www.lafoodco.com.
As we increase our sales, we will apply available funds to the expansion of our food manufacturing capabilities.
We currently produce our wet products at a certified commercial kitchen housed in the same building as our corporate
headquarters and we expect that this kitchen will be adequate for at least the next six months.
Our management believes there to be a multitude of small, locally-owned food businesses throughout Louisiana,
the products of which are worthy of national distribution. Our management further believes that we have the opportunity
to bring to these locally produced and sold Louisiana-centric specialty food products to the national market, by way of
distribution agreements, private label arrangements or acquisition.
While our level of future funding will determine the potential rate of growth for our business, our Plan of
Operations will be the same. Without additional funding, we will expand our operations only to the extent that our
operations generate adequate funds. There is, of course, no assurance that our operations will be successful, in this
regard. With additional funding, we believe that we will be able to increase sales of our products through our aggressive
advertising strategy. As with any start-up company that offers unproven products, there is no assurance that our company
will be successful with any level of additional funding.
Liquidity
For the Period from August 17, 2010 (inception), to September 30, 2010.
Working Capital. At September 30, 2010, we had working capital of $27,987, including cash on hand of
$22,353. Since our inception, we have raised a total of $55,600 from private sales of our common stock. Currently, we
possess approximately $37,000 in cash. We have ceased our efforts in raising funds privately, due to our management’s
belief that current market conditions favor our efforts pursuant to this offering to attract capital. There are no assurances
in this regard, however.
Cash Flows. For the Period from August 17, 2010 (inception), to September 30, 2010, we used $12,647 in our
operating activities. Our investing activities used $2,000 for equipment purchases. Our financing activities provided
$37,000 in cash, which we received from private sales of our common stock.
Contractual Obligations
To date, we have not entered into any significant long-term obligations that require us to make monthly cash
payments. Our longest-lived obligation is the lease agreement for our corporate headquarters, which expires in October
2011. Our monthly obligation under this lease is $200.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our critical accounting policies, including the assumptions and judgments underlying them, are disclosed in the
notes to our financial statements included in this Prospectus. We have consistently applied these policies in all material
respects. We do not believe that our operations to date have involved uncertainty of accounting treatment, subjective
judgment or estimates, to any significant degree.
Uncertainties and Trends
Our operations and revenues are dependent, now and in the future, upon the following factors:
• whether we successfully commercialize our new specialty food products;
• whether we compete effectively in the severely competitive food industry; and
• whether the continuing economic recession in the United States will adversely affect our
ability to attract customers to our specialty food products.
There is no assurance that our company will be able to accomplish our objectives. Our failure to do so would
likely cause purchasers of our common stock to lose their entire investments in our company.
Inflation
Inflation can be expected to have an impact on our operating costs. A prolonged period of inflation could cause
interest rates, wages and other costs to increase which would adversely affect our results of operations. In the current
economic and political climate, no predictions can be made with respect to the future effects of inflation on or business.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that would have any current or future effect on our financial
condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or
capital resources.
Capital Expenditures
During the period from August 17, 2010 (inception), to September 30, 2010, our capital expenditures were for
purchases of equipment in the amount of $2,000. Should we obtain at least $30,000, we expect to purchase selected
items of equipment for use in the production of our specialty food products, including product packaging equipment.
However, we cannot predict the exact amount of these potential capital expenditures.
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Prospectus contains forward-looking statements, which relate to future events or our future financial
performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may", "should",
"expects", "plans", "anticipates", "believes", "estimates", "predicts", "potential" or "continue" or the negative of these
terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled "Risk Factors", that may cause our or our
industry's actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results,
levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.
While these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are based, are made in good faith
and reflect our current judgment regarding the direction of our business, actual results will almost always vary, sometimes
materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future performance suggested herein.
Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any
of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth the names and ages of our current directors and executive officers.
|
David Loflin
Waddell D. Loflin
|
|
53
61
|
|
President and Director
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
Director
|
|
Our current officers and directors serve until the next annual meeting of our Board of Directors or until their
respective successors are elected and qualified. All officers serve at the discretion of our Board of Directors. Certain
information regarding the backgrounds of each of the officers and directors is set forth below.
David Loflin, for more than the five years ending in September 2010, served as an officer and director of
Santeon Group, Inc., a publicly-traded company (Symbol: UBCI), with his last position having been as a vice president.
Waddell D. Loflin, has, since January 2009, operated as an independent business consultant. For more than
the five years prior to January 2009, Mr. Loflin served as an officer and director of Santeon Group, Inc.
Promoter
Our legal counsel, Newlan & Newlan, is considered a promoter of our company.
Corporate Governance
Committees; Meetings of the Board. We do not have a separate Compensation Committee, Audit Committee
or Nominating Committee. These functions are to be conducted by our Board of Directors meeting as a whole.
To date, our Board of Directors has been taken by unanimous written consent in lieu of a meeting on 11
occasions; our Board of Directors has not yet held a meeting.
Audit Committee. Our Board of Directors has not established an audit committee. The functions of an audit
committee are currently performed by our entire Board of Directors. We are under no legal obligation to establish an
audit committee and our Board of Directors has elected not to do so. This decision was made so as to avoid the time and
expense of identifying independent directors willing to serve on the audit committee. We may establish an audit
committee in the future, if our Board of Directors determines it to be advisable or we are otherwise required to do so by
applicable law, rule or regulation.
Independence of Board of Directors
Neither of our directors is “independent”, within the meaning of definitions established by the SEC or any
self-regulatory organization. We are not currently subject to any law, rule or regulation requiring that all or any portion
of our Board of Directors include “independent” directors.
Shareholder Communications with Our Board of Directors
Our company welcomes comments and questions from our shareholders. Shareholders should direct all
communications to our President, David Loflin, at our executive offices. However, while we appreciate all comments
from shareholders, we may not be able to respond individually to all communications. We attempt to address shareholder
questions and concerns in our press releases and documents filed with the SEC, so that all shareholders have access to
information about us at the same time. Mr. Loflin collects and evaluates all shareholder communications. All
communications addressed to our directors and executive officers will be reviewed by those parties, unless the
communication is clearly frivolous.
Code of Ethics
As of the date of this Prospectus, our Board of Directors has not adopted a code of ethics with respect to our
directors, officers and employees.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth certain compensation information for our executive officers since the inception
of our company.
Summary Compensation Table
|
Name and
Principal
Position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compen-sation
($)
|
Non-qualified
Deferred
Compen-sation
Earnings
($)
|
All
Other
Compen-sation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
David Loflin
|
2010
|
--- (1)
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
Waddell D. Loflin
|
2010
|
--- (2)
|
---
|
2,500 (3)
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
2,500 (3)
|
Vice President,
Acting Chief
Financial Officer,
Secretary and
Treasurer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Mr. David Loflin, our President, currently has committed to provide up to 30 hours per week providing management services to us. He
has agreed to work for no cash remuneration until such time as we generate sufficient revenues for the payment of salaries to our
management.
(2) Mr. Waddell Loflin, our Vice President, Acting Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, currently has committed to provide up to 30 hours
per week providing management services to us. He has agreed to work for no cash remuneration until such time as we generate sufficient
revenues for the payment of salaries to our management.
(3) We issued 500,000 shares of our common stock to Mr. Loflin as a retention bonus, which shares were valued by our Board of Directors
at $2,500.
Currently, our management is unable to estimate accurately when our company will generate sufficient revenues
for the payment of salaries to our management. Also, our Board of Directors has yet to determine the level of
compensation that is to be paid to any of our management personnel.
As of the date of this Prospectus, there are no annuity, pension or retirement benefits proposed to be paid to
officers, directors or employees of our company, pursuant to any presently existing plan provided or contributed to by
our company.
Outstanding Equity Awards Since Inception
|
Option Awards
|
Stock Awards
|
Name
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unex-ercisable
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)
|
Option
Exercise
Price ($)
|
Option
Expira-tion Date
|
Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
|
Market
Value
of
Shares
or
Units
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)
|
None
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
n/a
|
---
|
n/a
|
---
|
---
|
Long-Term Incentive Plans
We currently have no long-term incentive plans.
Director Compensation
Our directors receive no compensation for their serving as directors.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Ownership of Common Stock
The following table sets forth certain information as of the date of this Prospectus, with respect to the beneficial
ownership of shares of our common stock by (i) each person known to us who owns beneficially more than 5% of the
outstanding shares of common stock, (ii) each of our directors, (iii) each of our executive officers and (iv) all of our
executive officers and directors as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, each shareholder has sole voting and investment
power with respect to the shares shown. As of the date of this Prospectus, we had 25,880,000 shares of common stock
issued and outstanding.
|
|
Prior to This Offering
|
|
After This Offering
|
Name and Address
of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Shares Owned
|
|
% (1)
|
|
Shares Owned
|
|
% (2)
|
David Loflin
|
|
15,000,000 (3)
|
|
48.42%
|
|
14,000,000 (3)
|
|
43.78%
|
Waddell D. Loflin
|
|
500,000
|
|
1.61%
|
|
500,000
|
|
1.56%
|
Newlan & Newlan (4)
|
|
7,000,000 (3)
|
|
22.60%
|
|
6,000,000 (3)
|
|
18.76%
|
Officers and directors as a
group (2 persons)
|
|
15,500,000 (3)
|
|
50.03%
|
|
14,500,000 (3)
|
|
45.34%
|
(1) Based on 30,980,000 shares outstanding, including 5,100,000 share underlying currently exercisable warrants.
(2) Based on 31,980,000 shares outstanding, including 5,100,000 share underlying currently exercisable warrants
and assuming the issuance of 1,000,000 share in the Direct Public Offering.
(3) 2,000,000 of these shares are unissued, but underlie currently exercisable warrants.
(4) The law firm of Newlan & Newlan is our company’s legal counsel; the firm’s address is 800 Parker Square,
Suite 205, Flower Mound, TX 75028.
Voting Agreement
The original terms of a pre-incorporation agreement among three of our shareholders, David Loflin, Paul J.
Goldman, M.D. and Newlan & Newlan, contained an agreement for the parties to vote for David Loflin as a director of
our company. This voting agreement has been terminated by the parties.
Shares Eligible for Future Sale
As of the date of this Prospectus, there were 25,880,000 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding.
Shares Covered by this Prospectus. As of the date of this Prospectus, all 8,380,000 shares being offered
hereunder by the Selling Shareholders may be sold without restriction under the Securities Act.
Rule 144. A person who has beneficially owned restricted shares of our common stock or warrants for at least
six months would be entitled to sell their common stock provided that (1) such person is not deemed to have been one
of our affiliates at the time of, or at any time during the three months preceding, a sale, (2) we had been subject to the
Exchange Act reporting requirements for at least 90 days before the sale and, (3) if the sale occurs prior to satisfaction
of a one-year holding period, we provide current information at the time of sale.
Persons who have beneficially owned restricted shares of our common stock or warrants for at least six months,
but who are our affiliates at the time of, or at any time during the three months preceding, a sale, would be subject to
additional restrictions, by which such person would be entitled to sell within any three-month period only a number of
common stock that does not exceed the greater of:
• 1% of the total number of shares of common stock then outstanding, which, as of the date of
this Prospectus, equals approximately 258,800 shares; and
• the average weekly trading volume of such securities during the four calendar weeks
preceding the filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to such sale;
provided, in each case, that we are subject to the Exchange Act periodic reporting requirements for at least three
months before the sale.
However, since we anticipate that our shares will be quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, which is not an
“automated quotation system”, our shareholders will not be able to rely on the market-based volume limitation described
in the second item above. If, in the future, our common stock is listed on an exchange or quoted on NASDAQ, then our
shareholders would be able to rely on the market-based volume limitation. Unless and until our common stock is so
listed or quoted, our shareholders are able to rely only on the percentage-based volume limitation described in the first
item above.
Such sales by affiliates must also comply with the manner of sale, current public information and notice
provisions of Rule 144. The Selling Shareholders will not be governed by the foregoing restrictions when selling their
shares pursuant to this Prospectus.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Pre-incorporation Agreement
In August 2010, three of our shareholders, David Loflin, our President, Paul J. Goldman, M.D. and Newlan &
Newlan, our legal counsel, entered into a pre-incorporation agreement. This agreement contained the following
provisions:
• Securities Issuances. Mr. Loflin, Dr. Goldman and Newlan & Newlan purchased securities
of our company, as follows:
• David Loflin purchased 13,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 2,000,000
warrants to purchase a like number of shares of Common Stock at an exercise price
of $.10 per share, for items of personal property and intellectual property valued by
our Board of Directors at $13,000.
• Paul J. Goldman, M.D. purchased 600,000 shares of Common Stock and 180,000
warrants to purchase a like number of shares of Common Stock at an exercise price
of $.10 per share, for $6,000 in cash.
• Newlan & Newlan, our legal counsel, was issued 5,000,000 shares of Common
Stock and 2,000,000 warrants to purchase a like number of shares of Common
Stock at an exercise price of $.10 per share, in payment of $10,000 in legal services.
• Voting Agreement. The original terms of this agreement required the parties to vote for
David Loflin as a director of our company. This voting agreement has been terminated by
the parties.
Retention Bonus
In August 2010, we issued 500,000 shares of our common stock to one of our officers, Waddell D. Loflin, as
a retention bonus, which shares were valued by our Board of Directors at $2,500, in the aggregate.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the shares to be sold by us under this Prospectus will be passed upon for us by Newlan &
Newlan, Flower Mound, Texas. Newlan & Newlan owns 5,000,000 shares of our common stock and 2,000,000 warrants
to purchase a like number of shares.
EXPERTS
Our financial statements for the period from August 17, 2010 (inception), to September 30, 2010, included in
this Prospectus have been audited by PMB Helin Donovan, LLP, as set forth in its report of independent registered public
accounting firm included in this Prospectus. Its report is given upon its authority as an expert in accounting and auditing.
COMMISSION POSITION ON INDEMNIFICATION
FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES
Our Articles of Incorporation provide that we shall indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent
permitted by Nevada law and that none of our directors will be personally liable to our company or our shareholders for
monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability:
• for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to our company or our shareholders;
• for acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing
violation of the law;
• under Nevada law for the unlawful payment of dividends; or
• for any transaction from which the director derives an improper personal benefit.
These provisions require us to indemnify our directors and officers unless restricted by Nevada law and
eliminate our rights and those of our shareholders to recover monetary damages from a director for breach of his
fiduciary duty of care as a director except in the situations described above. The limitations summarized above, however,
do not affect our ability or that of our shareholders to seek non-monetary remedies, such as an injunction or rescission,
against a director for breach of his fiduciary duty.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors,
officers and controlling persons pursuant to the foregoing provisions, we have been advised that, in the opinion of the
SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1, including this Prospectus, exhibits, schedules
and amendments, under the Securities Act, with respect to the shares of common stock to be offered and sold in this
offering. This Prospectus does not contain all of the information included in the registration statement. For further
information about us and the shares of our common stock to be offered and sold in this offering, please refer to this
registration statement (Commission File No.: 333-____________).
As of the date of this Prospectus, we became subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act.
Accordingly, we will file annual, quarterly and special reports and other information with the SEC. You may read and
copy any document we file at the SEC's public reference room at 100 F Street, N. E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You
should call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms. Our SEC filings will also
be available to the public at the SEC's web site located at http:/www.sec.gov.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2010
Statement of Operations for the Period from Inception (August 17, 2010) to September 30, 2010
Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Period from Inception (August 17, 2010) to
September 30, 2010
Statement of Cash Flows for the Period from Inception (August 17, 2010) to September 30, 2010
Notes to Financial Statements
|
F-1
F-2
F-3
F-4
F-5
F-6
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Louisiana Food Company:
|
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Louisiana Food Company (the Company) (a development stage
company) as of September 30, 2010, and the related statements of operations, shareholders' equity(deficit), and cash
flows for the period from inception (August 17, 2010) through September 30, 2010. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
|
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were
we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of
internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
|
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of Louisiana Food Company as of September 30, 2010, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the
period from inception (August 17, 2010) through September 30, 2010, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States of America.
|
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going
concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements the Company has sustained a net loss from operations and
has an accumulated deficit during the development stage. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in this regard are also described in Note 1. The financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
|
The accumulated equity (deficit) during the development stage for the period from date of inception (August 17,
2010) through September 30, 2010, is $40,415.
|
/s/ PMB HELIN DONOVAN, LLP
|
|
LOUISIANA FOOD COMPANY
(A Development Stage Company)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$22,353
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
27,987
|
|
|
Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $55
|
1,945
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
–
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.001 par value: 5,000,000 shares authorized; zero
shares issued and outstanding
|
$ ---
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.001 par value: 50,000,000 shares authorized;
25,700,000 shares issued and outstanding
|
25,450
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
65,326
|
|
|
|
Subscription receivable
|
(15,000)
|
|
|
|
Deficit accumulated during development stage
|
(35,361)
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
40,415
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$40,415
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
|
|
LOUISIANA FOOD COMPANY
(A Development Stage Company)
|
|
|
For the Period from Inception (August 17, 2010) to September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Legal and professional
|
|
|
|
|
16,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
2,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
35,361
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
(35,361)
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
$(0.00)
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
22,134,883
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
|
|
LOUISIANA FOOD COMPANY
(A Development Stage Company)
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY
|
|
|
For the Period From Inception (August 17, 2010) to September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.001 par value
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Additional
Paid-in Capital
|
|
Subscription
Receivable
|
Deficit
Accumulated
during
Development
Stage
|
Stockholders’
(Deficit)
Equity
|
Balance, August 17, 2010
|
|
|
---
|
$ ---
|
$ ---
|
|
$ ---
|
$ ---
|
$ ---
|
Stock issued for property at $.001 per share
|
|
|
13,000,000
|
13,000
|
---
|
|
---
|
---
|
13,000
|
Stock issued for services at $.002 per share
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
5,000
|
5,000
|
|
---
|
---
|
10,000
|
Stock issued for cash at $.01 per share
|
|
|
3,700,000
|
3,700
|
33,300
|
|
---
|
---
|
37,000
|
Stock issued for cash at $.01 per share
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
1,500
|
13,500
|
|
(15,000)
|
---
|
---
|
Stock issued for bonus at $.01 per share
|
|
|
500,000
|
500
|
2,000
|
|
---
|
---
|
2,500
|
Stock issued for services
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
2,000
|
8,000
|
|
---
|
---
|
10,000
|
Warrants issued for services
|
|
|
---
|
---
|
132,850
|
|
---
|
---
|
3,276
|
Net loss
|
|
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
---
|
(35,361)
|
(35,361)
|
Balance, September 30, 2010
|
|
|
25,700,000
|
$25,700
|
$61,800
|
|
$(15,000)
|
$(35,361)
|
$40,415
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
|
|
LOUISIANA FOOD COMPANY
(A Development Stage Company)
|
|
|
For the Period from Inception (August 17, 2010) to September 30, 2010
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to
cash used for operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
Non-cash operating expenses
|
|
|
25,776
|
|
|
|
(Increase) in deposits
|
|
|
(603)
|
|
|
|
(Increase) in inventory
|
|
|
(2,514)
|
|
|
Net cash used for operating activities
|
|
|
(12,647)
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of equipment
|
|
|
(2,000)
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(2,000)
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of common stock for cash
|
|
|
52,000
|
|
|
|
Subscription receivable
|
|
|
(15,000)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
37,000
|
|
|
NET CHANGE IN CASH
|
|
|
22,353
|
|
|
Cash, beginning of period
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
Cash, end of period
|
|
|
$22,353
|
|
|
|
Non-cash financing and investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued for services
|
|
|
$20,000
|
|
|
|
Stock issued for inventory and intangible asset
|
|
|
$13,000
|
|
|
|
Stock issued for bonus
|
|
|
$2,500
|
|
|
|
Warrants issued for services
|
|
|
$3,276
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
|
|
LOUISIANA FOOD COMPANY
(A Development Stage Company)
|
|
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Louisiana Food Company (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on August 17, 2010 (Inception).
The Company’s focus is on the development and commercial exploitation of food-related business opportunities in
the State of Louisiana. To date, the Company has developed a line of packaged specialty food products, a line of
specialty pasta sauces and a line of specialty coffee products, and sells these specialty food product lines to
distributors, retailers and over the Internet. Because each of the Company’s products is produced locally in Louisiana,
the Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry has granted the Company a license to affix the Department’s
“Certified” logos on the Company’s products. The Company’s leased headquarters and kitchen facilities are located
within a food technology incubator established by the River Parish Community Development Corporation which
offers the Company extremely economic access to FDA-approved commercial kitchen facilities.
|
Liquidity and Management Plans
|
At September 30, 2010, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $22,353, working capital of $27,987 and an
accumulated deficit during the development stage of $35,361. Management has taken several actions to ensure that
the Company will have sufficient cash for its working capital needs through September 30, 2011, including
minimization of discretionary expenditures, maintenance of no debt liabilities, commitment to a minimal office lease
of $200 per month for one year, and use of health code compliant kitchen facilities on an hourly basis to handle its
sales orders on an as needed basis. The Company plans to seek an additional equity infusion to support operations
through a stock offering. Management believes that these actions will enable the Company to meet its working capital
needs through September 30, 2010.
|
The Company has incurred losses totaling $35,361 from its Inception through September 30, 2010, and had limited
working capital at September 30, 2010. Because of these conditions, the Company will require additional working
capital to continue operations and develop its business. The Company intends to raise additional working capital either
through private placements, public offerings and/or bank financing.
|
There are no assurances that the Company will be able to achieve a level of revenues adequate to generate sufficient
cash flow from operations or obtain additional financing through private placements, public offerings and/or bank
financing necessary to support the Company’s working capital requirements. To the extent that funds generated from
any private placements, public offerings and/or bank financing are insufficient, the Company will have to raise
additional working capital. No assurance can be given that additional financing will be available, or if available, will
be on terms acceptable to the Company. If adequate working capital is not available, the Company may not continue
its operations or execute its business plan.
|
These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial
statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts
or the amount and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as
a going concern.
|
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
The Company presents its financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States (“GAAP”). In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) completed its
accounting guidance codification project. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) is the single source
of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by non-governmental entities in the
preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. The Company refers to the ASC Codification as the
sole source of authoritative literature.
|
Development Stage Company
|
The Company has not generated revenue since Inception. The accompanying financial statements have, therefore,
been prepared using the accounting format prescribed for a development stage company in ASC 915.
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reporting of amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported
period. Significant estimates include valuation of receivables, inventory and stock warrants. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
|
The Company elected September 30 as its fiscal year ending date.
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase
to be cash equivalents.
|
The Company derives its revenue from sales of its food and coffee products. The Company recognizes revenue in
accordance with ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. Under the authoritative guidance, revenue is recognized when there
is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery has occurred and services have been rendered, the sales price is
determinable and collectability is reasonable assured. Sales are recorded net of discounts, rebates and returns.
|
Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance
for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s
existing accounts receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on historical write-off experience,
customer specific facts and economic conditions. Outstanding account balances are reviewed individually for
collectability. Bad debt expense is included in general and administrative expenses. To date, the Company has not
charged off any balances, as all of its accounts receivable are currently not of an “aged” nature.
|
The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its customers.
|
Inventory is composed of coffee and food items needed to formulate the Company’s branded products and are stated
at lower of cost (first in, first out) or market through the use of a valuation allowance. In order to assess the ultimate
realization of inventories, the Company makes judgments as to future demand compared to current inventory levels.
No such allowance is currently established at September 30, 2010.
|
Property and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation and amortization is computed on the straight-line method
over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful life of the Company’s equipment is three years.
Depreciation expense for the period from Inception to September 30, 2010, was $55.
|
Intangibles consist of trade names, trademarks, brand names and recipes. Purchased trademarks are initially measured
based on their fair values. Trademarks include purchased trademarks, brand names, logos or other recognizable
symbols associated with the Company's products. Trademarks are not amortized because they have indefinite lives.
Assets determined to have indefinite lives are no longer amortized in accordance with ASC 350, Goodwill and other
Intangibles, but are tested for impairment on an annual basis. The carrying amount of intangibles not subject to
amortization is $10,483 as of September 30, 2010.
|
The Company evaluates the recoverability of identifiable intangible assets annually or whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate that an intangible asset's carrying amount may not be recoverable. Such circumstances could
include, but are not limited to: (1) a significant decrease in the market value of an asset, (2) a significant adverse
change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, or (3) an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the
amount originally expected for the acquisition of an asset. The Company measures the carrying amount of the asset
against the estimated undiscounted future cash flows associated with it. If the sum of the expected future net cash
flows are less than the carrying value of the asset being evaluated, an impairment loss would be recognized. The
impairment loss would be calculated as the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value.
The fair value is measured based on quoted market prices, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, the
estimate of fair value is based on various valuation techniques, including the discounted value of estimated future cash
flows. The evaluation of asset impairment requires the Company to make assumptions about future cash flows over
the life of the asset being evaluated. These assumptions require significant judgment and actual results may differ
from assumed and estimated amounts. During the period from Inception through September 30, 2010, the Company
recorded no impairment losses related to an intangible asset.
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
|
The Company adopted ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820) for nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities measured on a nonrecurring basis in August 2010, and such adoption did not have a material
impact on the Company’s financial statement disclosures. ASC 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that
would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principle or most advantageous
market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC
820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
|
The levels of the fair value hierarchy established by ASC 820 are:
|
Level 1:
|
inputs are quoted prices, unadjusted, in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the
reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
|
Level 2:
|
inputs are other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or
liability, either directly or indirectly. A Level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full
term of the asset or liability.
|
Level 3:
|
inputs are unobservable and reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that
market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
|
At September 30, 2010, the Company does not have any assets or liabilities which are recorded at fair value on a
recurring basis.
|
The Company considers the recorded value of certain of its financial assets and liabilities, which consist primarily
of cash and cash equivalents and other current assets, to approximate the fair value of the respective assets at
September 30, 2010, based upon the short-term nature of the assets. The carrying value of certain of the financial
instruments, of other current assets, approximate fair value due to their short maturities.
|
Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services
|
The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services
under guidance of ASC 505-50-30. Pursuant to ASC 505-50-30, all transactions in which goods or services are the
consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the
consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The
measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which
the performance is complete, the date on which it is probable that performance will occur or the date of issuance of
the equity instrument.
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
Income taxes are calculated based upon the liability method of accounting in accordance with ASC 750-10-60, Income
Taxes. In accordance with ASC 750-10-60, deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences in
future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each
year-end. A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if management does not believe the Company
has met the “more likely than not” standard to allow for recognition of such an asset. In addition, realization of an
uncertain income tax position must be estimated as “more likely than not” (i.e., greater than 50% likelihood of
receiving a benefit) before it can be recognized in the financial statements. Further, the recognition of tax benefits
recorded in the financial statements to be based on the amount most likely to be realized assuming a review by tax
authorities having all relevant information. The Company had minimal impact from adoption of this Interpretation.
|
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share
|
The Company is required to provide basic and dilutive earnings (loss) per common share information. The basic net
loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss applicable to common stockholders by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding.
|
Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss applicable to common stockholders, adjusted
on an “as if converted” basis, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus potential dilutive
securities. At September 30, 2010, there were potentially dilutive securities outstanding consisting of warrants
convertible into 5,100,000 shares of common stock.
|
Basic loss per share has been calculated based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding during the period.
|
The Company evaluates events that occur subsequent to the balance sheet date of periodic reports, but before financial
statements are issued for periods ending on such balance sheet dates, for possible adjustment to such financial
statements or other disclosure. This evaluation generally occurs through the date at which the Company’s financial
statements are electronically prepared for filing.
|
The Company currently has only a single source for its packaged dry products and coffee products. The Company’s
market is currently concentrated in the State of Louisiana and, through the Internet and its distributor program, is
attempting to broaden its market to other states. At September 30, 2010, the Company has a very small established
customer base.
|
The Company does not own any real property. The Company currently leases corporate office space and FDA-approved commercial kitchen facilities in Norco, Louisiana.
|
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
|
Accounting Standards Codification: In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and
the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (“SFAS
168”). The guidance establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) as the source of authoritative
accounting principles recognized by the FASB. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for interim
and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company adopted this guidance for its fiscal year ended
September 30, 2010. There was no change to the Company’s financial statements due to the implementation of this
guidance.
|
Fair Value Measurements: In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-05,
Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value (“ASU 2009-05”). ASU 2009-05 provides clarification that in circumstances in
which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to
measure fair value of such liability using one or more of the techniques prescribed by the update. ASU 2009-05 is
effective for the first reporting period beginning after issuance. The Company adopted ASU 2009-05 for its fiscal year
ended September 30, 2010. There was no change to its financial statements due to the implementation of this
guidance.
|
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820):
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU 2010-06”). Reporting entities will have to provide
information about movements of assets among Levels 1 and 2; and a reconciliation of purchases, sales, issuance, and
settlements of activity valued with a Level 3 method, of the three-tier fair value hierarchy established by SFAS No.
157. The ASU 2010-06 also clarifies the existing guidance to require fair value measurement disclosures for each
class of assets and liabilities. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2009, for Level 1 and 2 disclosure requirements and after December 15, 2010, for Level 3 disclosure
requirements. The Company will adopt the guidance in its fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2010. The Company does
not anticipate this adoption will have a material impact on its financial statements.
|
Transfers of Financial Assets: In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-16, Transfers and Servicing
(Topic 860)—Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets (“ASU 2009-16”). ASU 2009-16 codifies SFAS No. 166,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (“SFAS 166”), issued in
June 2009. The guidance eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity” and changes the requirements
for derecognizing financial assets. The guidance is effective as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period
that begins after November 15, 2009. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The Company will adopt the guidance in the first
quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company does not anticipate this adoption will have a material impact on its financial
statements.
|
Amendments to Accounting Standards Codification: In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-08,
Technical Corrections to Various Topics (“ASU 2010-08”). ASU 2010-08 makes various non-substantive
amendments to the FASB Codification that does not fundamentally change existing GAAP; however, certain
amendments could alter the application of GAAP relating to embedded derivatives and the income tax aspects of
reorganization. The amended guidance is effective beginning in the first interim or annual period beginning after the
release of the ASU, except for certain amendments. The Company will adopt the guidance in the first quarter of 2011.
The Company does not anticipate this adoption will have a material impact on its financial statements.
|
Subsequent Events: On February 24, 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855) –
Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2010-09”). ASU 2010-09 removes the
requirement that SEC filers disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This amendment
alleviates potential conflicts between Subtopic 855-10 and the SEC’s requirements. The guidance became effective
with the issuance of ASU 2010-09 and the Company has adopted this guidance.
|
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-04, Accounting for Various Topics – Technical
Corrections for SEC Paragraphs (“Update”). Included in the Update is clarification as to the date of issuance of a
financial statement including clarification of subsequent events issues in relation to the issuance of such financial
statements (FASB ASC 855-10-S99). The Company does not believe that this update will have a material impact on
its financial statements.
|
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(“FV Update”), requiring disclosures for transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 fair value measurements and
descriptions for the reasons for the transfers, as well as increased disclosure requirements for activity in Level 3 fair
value measurements. The FV Update was issued to amend current disclosure requirements for such valuations. The
Company does not believe that this update will have a material impact on its financial statements.
|
NOTE 3. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
The Company was formed pursuant to a pre-incorporation agreement. The Company’s President was a party to this
agreement and was, upon formation of the Company and in accordance with the pre-incorporation agreement, issued
13,000,000 shares of Company common stock and 2,000,000 warrants to purchase a like number of shares at an
exercise price of $.10 per share. The Company received items of personal and intellectual property in exchange for
its shares of common stock. The Company’s Board of Directors determined that the aggregate value of the items of
property was $13,000, of which $2,517 has been recorded as inventory and $10,483 has been recorded as an
intangible asset. The value of the warrants of $1,638 has been included in compensation expense.
|
The Company’s legal counsel was also a party to the pre-incorporation agreement and is considered a promoter of
the Company. Upon formation of the Company and in accordance with the pre-incorporation agreement, the
Company’s legal counsel was issued 5,000,000 shares of Company common stock and 2,000,000 warrants to purchase
a like number of shares at an exercise price of $.10 per share, in payment of $10,000 in legal services. The value of
the warrants of $1,638 has been included in professional fees.
|
At September 30, 2010, the Company had deferred tax assets principally arising from net operating loss carry-forwards for income tax purposes. The Company calculates its deferred tax assets using the federal tax rate of 35%
and the following state tax rates: Louisiana (from 4-8%). Due to its net operating loss and the uncertainty of future
profitability and limitations on the utilization of net operating loss carry-forwards under IRC Section 382, a valuation
allowance has been recorded to fully offset the Company’s deferred tax asset.
|
The actual Federal income tax provision differs from the amount computed by applying the Federal corporate income
tax rate of 35% to income before taxes as follows for the years ended September 30, 2010:
|
|
Expected federal tax benefit
|
$12,376
|
|
|
Non-deductible expenses
|
3,276
|
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
(12,376)
|
|
The tax effect of temporary differences that give rise to the deferred tax assets at September 30, 2010, are as follows:
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
$(32,085)
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
(23,597)
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
$ 0
|
|
In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management determines whether it is more likely than not some,
or all, of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon
the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.
Management considers projected future taxable income. Management considers projected taxable income and tax
planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable losses and projected taxable
losses over the periods that the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that
the Company will not realize the benefits of these deductible differences and thus recorded a valuation allowance
against the entire deferred tax asset balance.
|
At September 30, 2010, the Company had net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $32,085 for federal
income tax purposes. The net operating loss carry-forwards are available to be utilized against future taxable income
through fiscal year 2030, subject to the Tax Reform Act of 1986, which imposed substantial restrictions on the
utilization of net operating losses and tax credits in the event of an “ownership change” as defined by the Internal
Revenue Code. Federal and state net operating losses are subject to limitations as a result of these restrictions. Under
such circumstances, the Company’s ability to utilize its net operating losses against future income may be reduced.
|
A reconciliation of the statutory of federal and state tax rates to the Company’s effective tax rates is as follows:
|
|
Statutory regular federal income tax rate
|
35%
|
|
|
Statutory regular state income tax rate
|
4-8%
|
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
(100%)
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
0%
|
|
Reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the Company's effective tax rate is as follows:
|
|
Net loss before taxes
|
$35,361
|
|
|
Increase in deferred tax asset
|
12,376
|
|
|
Change in deferred tax asset valuation account
|
(12,376)
|
|
The valuation allowance has been estimated in an amount equal to the projected future benefit of the loss carryforward
because there is no assumption that the Company will generate sufficient income to utilize the tax benefit. The losses
incurred to date may be limited due to changes in control of the Company and limitations on the deductibility of fees
for services paid through the issuance of common stock. The Company will have unused net operating losses
available for carry-forwards of approximately $32,085 that will start to expire in 2030 in the United States of America.
|
At September 30, 2010, deposits, comprised entirely of a utility security deposit, were $603.
|
NOTE 6. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
The Company’s intangible assets include trademarks, brand names and recipes of its food and coffee products
acquired in exchange for the issuance of common stock.
|
Common Stock Issued for Property
|
During the period from Inception through September 30, 2010, the Company issued 13,000,000 shares of its common
stock for items of personal and intangible property. Specifically, the Company received goods and recipes useful in
its specialty food business. The Company’s Board of Directors determined that the aggregate value of the items of
property was $13,000, of which $2,517 was determined to be inventory and $10,483 was determined to be recipes
and brand names.
|
Common Stock Issued for Services
|
The holders of the Company’s common stock currently have (i) equal ratable rights to dividends from funds legally
available therefore, when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors; (ii) are entitled to share ratably in all of the
Company’s assets available for distribution to holders of common stock upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up
of the affairs of the Company; (iii) do not have preemptive, subscriptive or conversion rights and there are no
redemption or sinking fund provisions or rights applicable thereto; and (iv) are entitled to one non-cumulative vote
per share on all matters on which shareholders may vote.
|
The Company’s Board of Directors is authorized to determine or alter any or all of the rights, preferences, privileges
and restrictions granted to or imposed upon any wholly unissued series of preferred stock and, within the limitations
or restrictions stated in any resolution or resolutions of the Board of Directors originally fixing the number of shares
constituting any series, to increase or decrease (but not below the number of shares of any such series then
outstanding) the number of shares comprising any such series subsequent to the issue of shares of that series, to set
the designation of any series, and to provide for rights and terms of redemption, conversion, dividends, voting rights,
and liquidation preferences of the shares of any such series.
|
During the period from Inception through September 30, 2010, the Company issued a total of 7,000,000 shares of
its common stock for services to third-party consultants for services, resulting in $20,000 in non-cash compensation
expense included in professional and legal expenses and consulting fees in the accompanying statement of operations.
The value of the transactions was determined based on value of shares of common stock issued as determined by the
board of directors. As there are no performance commitments or penalties for non-performance, the Company
recorded the expense at the date of issuance.
|
Common Stock Issued for Cash
|
During the period from Inception through September 30, 2010, the Company issued a total of 5,200,000 shares of
its common stock for cash in the total amount of $52,000.
|
At September 30, 2010, the Company had not received a total of $15,000 in payment of common stock sold. This
is amount appears as a subscription receivable on the accompanying balance sheet and statement of stockholders’
equity (deficit).
|
NOTE 8. WARRANTS TO PURCHASE COMMON STOCK
|
Outstanding Stock Warrants
|
In August and September 2010, the Company issued stock warrants to two related-parties. The President, Mr. David
Loflin, was issued 2,000,000 warrants for services rendered in establishing the Company. The law firm of Newlan
& Newlan, Counsel to the Company, was issued 2,000,000 warrants for professional services rendered for organizing
the Company. Additionally, 1,100,000 warrants were issued to purchasers of common shares during the period from
Inception (August 17, 2010) through September 30, 2010. The warrants allow the warrant holders to purchase, in
aggregate, 5,100,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.10 per share. The two-year warrants expire during
August 2012 and September 2012. All warrants are fully vested and exercisable at September 30, 2010. For the
period from Inception through September 30, 2010, $1,638 and $1,638 of compensation expense and professional
fees, respectively, related to the issuance of the warrants was recognized. A summary of the status and changes of
the warrants issued during the period from Inception through September 30, 2010, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of period
|
|
-0-
|
|
$ -0-
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of period
|
|
5,100,000
|
|
$0.10
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of period
|
|
5,100,000
|
|
$0.10
|
A summary of the status of the warrants outstanding at September 30, 2010, is presented below:
|
|
Warrants Outstanding
|
|
Warrants Exercisable
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
Number
Outstanding
|
|
Weighted Average
Remaining Contractual Life
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Number
Exercisable
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
$0.10
|
|
5,100,000
|
|
2 years
|
|
$0.10
|
|
5,100,000
|
|
$0.10
|
At September 30, 2010, vested warrants of 5,100,000 had an aggregate intrinsic value of $0.
|
The fair value of each of the Company’s stock warrants is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model that uses the assumptions noted in the table below. Expected volatility is based on an average of
historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life
of the stock warrant award is based on the yield curve of a zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond on the date the award is
granted with a maturity equal to the expected term of the award. The Company uses historical data to estimate
forfeitures within its valuation model.
|
The significant weighted average assumptions relating to the valuation of the Company’s options for the period ended
September 30, 2010, were as follows:
|
|
Risk-free interest rate (2 YR U.S. Treasury)
|
0.37% to 0.58%
|
|
NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
The Company’s corporate office is located in Norco, Louisiana, under a one year lease that expires September 30,
2011, and requires monthly rental payments of $200 per month. The Company has no future minimum rental
commitments beyond September 30, 2011. The Company had rental expense under operating leases of $200 for the
period ended September 30, 2010.
|
NOTE 10. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
|
The Company has adopted ASC 260-10-45-60, which provides for calculation of “basic” and “diluted” earnings per
share. The computation of earnings (loss) per share of common stock is based on the weighted average number of
shares outstanding at the date of the financial statements. The computation of diluted earnings per common share is
based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year plus the common stock equivalents that
would arise from the exercise of stock options and warrants outstanding under the treasury method and the average
market price per share during the year. Common stock equivalents at September 30, 2010, consisted of 5,100,000
in warrants. Common stock equivalents at September 30, 2010, were considered but were not included in the
computation of loss per share at September 30, 2010, because they would have been anti-dilutive.
|
|
|
|
Net Loss
(Numerator)
|
|
Shares
(Denominator)
|
|
Per-Share
Amount
|
|
Earnings for the period from Inception (August 17, 2010)
through September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss to common shareholders
|
|
$(35,361)
|
|
22,134,883
|
|
$(0.00)
|
NOTE 11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
|
In October 2010, the Company received $15,000 in cash in payment of the $15,000 subscription receivable that
appears on the accompanying balance sheet.
|
Private Offering of Common Stock
|
In October 2010, the Company completed a private offering of its common stock. In this private offering, the
Company sold 180,000 shares of its common stock for cash in the aggregate amount of $3,600, or $.02 per share.
|
The undersigned (the “Subscriber”) hereby subscribes for that number of shares of common stock (the “Shares”) of
Louisiana Food Company, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), set forth below, upon and subject to the terms and
conditions set forth in the Company’s Prospectus dated __________, 201__, to which this Subscription Agreement
is attached and which the Subscriber acknowledges as having received and read.
|
Total number of shares subscribed at $0.30 per share:
|
|
Amount paid with this Subscription Agreement at a price of $0.30 per Share:
|
|
This Subscription Agreement constitutes a binding agreement between Subscriber and the Company and may be
amended only by a writing executed by all parties.
|
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Subscriber has executed this Subscription Agreement this ___ day of ______, 201__.
|
Individual Subscriber(s)
|
|
Entity Subscriber
|
|
(Signature)
|
|
|
|
(Entity Name)
|
|
|
(Signature of Co-Subscriber)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Printed Name of Co-Subscriber)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriber’s Telephone #:
|
|
|
Subscriber’s E-Mail Address:
|
|
|
Name of Subscriber, as it should appear on the Certificate:
|
|
|
If Joint Ownership, check one (all parties must sign above):
|
[ ]
|
tenants in common
|
[ ]
|
tenants by the entireties
|
[ ]
|
joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common
|
[ ]
|
Uniform Gifts to Minors Act: ___________________ Custodian, ___________________ (Minor)
under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act of _________________________ (State)
|
If Subscriber is an entity, please complete the appropriate item below, naming the person with whom the
Company is authorized to correspond in matters concerning the Shares:
|
[ ]
|
Corporation
|
|
Name of Authorized Person:
|
|
|
[ ]
|
LLC
|
|
Name of Authorized Person:
|
|
|
[ ]
|
Partnership
|
|
Name of Authorized Person:
|
|
|
[ ]
|
Trust
|
|
Name of Authorized Person:
|
|
|
[ ]
|
Estate
|
|
Name of Authorized Person:
|
|
|
|
Name of Authorized Person:
|
|
|
INSTRUCTIONS FOR PAYMENTS BY CHECK OR MONEY ORDER
|
|
Payments of the purchase price of the Shares made by check or money orders shall be made payable to:
“LOUISIANA FOOD COMPANY”, and are to be sent to the attention of David Loflin, President, at the
following address: 917 Third Street, Norco, Louisiana 70079.
|
|
INSTRUCTIONS FOR PAYMENTS BY WIRE TRANSFER
|
|
Payments of the purchase price of the Shares to be made by wire transfer are to be made pursuant to the
following procedure:
|
|
1.
|
This completed Subscription Agreement shall be sent to the Company via either (A) e-mail at
subscriptions@lafoodco.com or (B) fax at (___) ___-____.
|
|
2.
|
If this Subscription Agreement is accepted by the Company, the Company shall, by reply e-mail
or fax, send wire transfer instructions to Subscriber.
|
|
3.
|
Within 48 hours of Subscriber’s receipt of the Company’s wire transfer instructions, Subscriber
shall have delivered to the Company the purchase price amount via wire transfer.
|
|
The foregoing Subscription is hereby accepted for and on behalf of
Louisiana Food Company this _____day of _____________, 201___.
ACCEPTANCE OF SUBSCRIPTION:
LOUISIANA FOOD COMPANY
By: ______________________________
David Loflin
President
|
|
|
PART II – INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
Item 13. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.
The following table sets forth estimated expenses expected to be incurred in connection with the issuance and
distribution of the securities being registered. All such expenses will be paid by us.
|
SEC Registration Fee
|
|
$200.64
|
|
|
Blue Sky Fees and Expenses
|
|
750.00
|
*
|
|
Audit Fees and Expenses
|
|
5,000.00
|
|
|
Legal Fees and Expenses
|
|
7,000.00
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Expenses
|
|
1,000.00
|
*
|
Item 14. Indemnification of Directors and Officers.
The officers and directors of the Company are indemnified as provided by the Nevada Revised Statutes and the
Bylaws of the Company. Unless specifically limited by a corporation’s Articles of Incorporation, Nevada law
automatically provides directors with immunity from monetary liabilities. The Company’s Articles of Incorporation do
not contain any such limiting language. Excepted from that immunity are:
A. willful failure to deal fairly with the corporation or its shareholders in connection with a
matter in which the director has a material conflict of interest;
B. a violation of criminal law unless the director had reasonable cause to believe that his or her
conduct was lawful or no reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful;
C. a transaction from which the director derived an improper personal profit; and
D. willful misconduct.
The Articles of Incorporation provide that the Company will indemnify its officers, directors, legal
representative, and persons serving at the request of the Company as a director or officer of another corporation, or as
its representative in a partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise to the fullest extent legally permissible under
the laws of the State of Nevada against all expenses, liability and loss (including attorney’s fees, judgments, fines and
amounts paid or to be paid in settlement) reasonably incurred or suffered by that person as a result of that connection
to the Company. This right of indemnification under the Articles is a contract right which may be enforced in any manner
by such person and extends for such persons benefit to all actions undertaken on behalf of the Company.
The Bylaws of the Company provide that the Company will indemnify its directors and officers to the fullest
extent not prohibited by Nevada law; provided, however, that the Company may modify the extent of such
indemnification by individual contracts with its directors and officers; and, provided, further, that the Company shall not
be required to indemnify any director or officer in connection with any proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such
person unless (i) such indemnification is expressly required to be made by law, (ii) the proceeding was authorized by
our Board of Directors of the Company, (iii) such indemnification is provided by the Company, in its sole discretion,
pursuant to the powers vested in the Company under Nevada law or (iv) such indemnification is required to be made
pursuant to the Bylaws.
The Bylaws of the Company provide that the Company will advance to any person who was or is a party or is
threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that he is or was a director or officer, of the Company, or is or was
serving at the request of the Company as a director or executive officer of another Company, partnership, joint venture,
trust or other enterprise, prior to the final disposition of the proceeding, promptly following request therefore, all
expenses incurred by any director or officer in connection with such proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or
on behalf of such person to repay said amounts if it should be determined ultimately that such person is not entitled to
be indemnified under the Bylaws of the Company or otherwise.
The Bylaws of the Company provide that no advance shall be made by the Company to an officer of the
Company (except by reason of the fact that such officer is or was a director of the Company in which event this paragraph
shall not apply) in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, if a
determination is reasonably and promptly made (i) by our Board of Directors by a majority vote of a quorum consisting
of directors who were not parties to the proceeding, or (ii) if such quorum is not obtainable, or, even if obtainable, a
quorum of disinterested directors so directs, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion, that the facts known to
the decision-making party at the time such determination is made demonstrate clearly and convincingly that such person
acted in bad faith or in a manner that such person did not believe to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the
Company.
Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.
1. (a) Securities Sold. On August 17, 2010, 13,000,000 shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter
or Other Purchasers. Such shares of common stock were issued to David Loflin; (c) Consideration. Such shares of
common stock were issued for items of personal and intangible property valued at $13,000; and (d) Exemption from
Registration Claimed. These securities are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) thereof and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public
offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated investor capable of evaluating an investment in our company.
2. (a) Securities Sold. On August 17, 2010, 2,000,000 common stock purchase warrants to purchase a like
number of shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter or Other Purchasers. Such common stock purchase
warrants were issued to David Loflin; (c) Consideration. Such common stock purchase warrants were issued as part of
a securities unit, there being no consideration assigned to such common stock purchase warrants; and (d) Exemption from
Registration Claimed. These securities are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) thereof and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public
offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated investor capable of evaluating an investment in our company; (e) Terms of
Conversion or Exercise. The exercise price of the common stock purchase warrants is $.10 per share. All of the common
stock purchase warrants are exercisable until August 16, 2012.
3. (a) Securities Sold. On August 17, 2010, 5,000,000 shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter
or Other Purchasers. Such shares of common stock were issued to Newlan & Newlan, Attorneys at Law; (c)
Consideration. Such shares of common stock were issued in payment of $10,000 in legal services; and (d) Exemption
from Registration Claimed. These securities are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) thereof and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public
offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated investor capable of evaluating an investment in our company.
4. (a) Securities Sold. On August 17, 2010, 2,000,000 common stock purchase warrants to purchase a like
number of shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter or Other Purchasers. Such common stock purchase
warrants were issued to Newlan & Newlan, Attorneys at Law; (c) Consideration. Such common stock purchase warrants
were issued as part of a securities unit, there being no consideration assigned to such common stock purchase warrants;
and (d) Exemption from Registration Claimed. These securities are exempt from registration under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) thereof and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not
involving a public offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated investor capable of evaluating an investment in our
company; (e) Terms of Conversion or Exercise. The exercise price of the common stock purchase warrants is $.10 per
share. All of the common stock purchase warrants are exercisable until August 16, 2012.
5. (a) Securities Sold. On August 19, 2010, 500,000 shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter or
Other Purchasers. Such shares of common stock were issued to Roy Brumbaugh; (c) Consideration. Such shares of
common stock were issued for $5,000 in cash; and (d) Exemption from Registration Claimed. These securities are
exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) thereof
and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated investor
capable of evaluating an investment in our company.
6. (a) Securities Sold. On August 19, 2010, 100,000 common stock purchase warrants to purchase a like
number of shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter or Other Purchasers. Such common stock purchase
warrants were issued to Roy Brumbaugh; (c) Consideration. Such common stock purchase warrants were issued as part
of units of securities, there being no consideration assigned to such common stock purchase warrants; and (d) Exemption
from Registration Claimed. These securities are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) thereof and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public
offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated investor capable of evaluating an investment in our company; (e) Terms of
Conversion or Exercise. The exercise price of the common stock purchase warrants is $.10 per share. All of the common
stock purchase warrants are exercisable until August 18, 2012.
7. (a) Securities Sold. On August 19, 2010, 500,000 shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter or
Other Purchasers. Such shares of common stock were issued to Brad A. Kinder; (c) Consideration. Such shares of
common stock were issued for $5,000 in cash; and (d) Exemption from Registration Claimed. These securities are
exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) thereof
and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated investor
capable of evaluating an investment in our company.
8. (a) Securities Sold. On August 19, 2010, 100,000 common stock purchase warrants to purchase a like
number of shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter or Other Purchasers. Such common stock purchase
warrants were issued to Brad A. Kinder; (c) Consideration. Such common stock purchase warrants were issued as part
of units of securities, there being no consideration assigned to such common stock purchase warrants; and (d) Exemption
from Registration Claimed. These securities are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) thereof and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public
offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated investor capable of evaluating an investment in our company; (e) Terms of
Conversion or Exercise. The exercise price of the common stock purchase warrants is $.10 per share. All of the common
stock purchase warrants are exercisable until August 18, 2012.
9. (a) Securities Sold. On August 19, 2010, 500,000 shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter or
Other Purchasers. Such shares of common stock were issued to Douglas V. Martin; (c) Consideration. Such shares of
common stock were issued for $5,000 in cash; and (d) Exemption from Registration Claimed. These securities are
exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) thereof
and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated investor
capable of evaluating an investment in our company.
10. (a) Securities Sold. On August 19, 2010, 100,000 common stock purchase warrants to purchase a like
number of shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter or Other Purchasers. Such common stock purchase
warrants were issued to Douglas V. Martin; (c) Consideration. Such common stock purchase warrants were issued as
part of units of securities, there being no consideration assigned to such common stock purchase warrants; and (d)
Exemption from Registration Claimed. These securities are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) thereof and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving
a public offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated investor capable of evaluating an investment in our company; (e)
Terms of Conversion or Exercise. The exercise price of the common stock purchase warrants is $.10 per share. All of
the common stock purchase warrants are exercisable until August 18, 2012.
11. (a) Securities Sold. On August 31, 2010, 250,000 shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter
or Other Purchasers. Such shares of common stock were issued to William Huff; (c) Consideration. Such shares of
common stock were issued for $2,500 in cash; and (d) Exemption from Registration Claimed. These securities are
exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) thereof
and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated investor
capable of evaluating an investment in our company.
12. (a) Securities Sold. On August 19, 2010, 50,000 common stock purchase warrants to purchase a like
number of shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter or Other Purchasers. Such common stock purchase
warrants were issued to William Huff; (c) Consideration. Such common stock purchase warrants were issued as part of
units of securities, there being no consideration assigned to such common stock purchase warrants; and (d) Exemption
from Registration Claimed. These securities are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) thereof and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public
offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated investor capable of evaluating an investment in our company; (e) Terms of
Conversion or Exercise. The exercise price of the common stock purchase warrants is $.10 per share. All of the common
stock purchase warrants are exercisable until August 30, 2012.
13. (a) Securities Sold. On August 31, 2010, 250,000 shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter
or Other Purchasers. Such shares of common stock were issued to Clarence Farmer; (c) Consideration. Such shares of
common stock were issued for $2,500 in cash; and (d) Exemption from Registration Claimed. These securities are
exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) thereof
and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated investor
capable of evaluating an investment in our company.
14. (a) Securities Sold. On August 19, 2010, 50,000 common stock purchase warrants to purchase a like
number of shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter or Other Purchasers. Such common stock purchase
warrants were issued to Clarence Huff; (c) Consideration. Such common stock purchase warrants were issued as part of
units of securities, there being no consideration assigned to such common stock purchase warrants; and (d) Exemption
from Registration Claimed. These securities are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) thereof and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public
offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated investor capable of evaluating an investment in our company; (e) Terms of
Conversion or Exercise. The exercise price of the common stock purchase warrants is $.10 per share. All of the common
stock purchase warrants are exercisable until August 30, 2012.
15. (a) Securities Sold. On August 26, 2010, 2,000,000 shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter
or Other Purchasers. Such shares of common stock were issued to Rage Marketing, Inc.; (c) Consideration. Such shares
of common stock were issued in payment of $10,000 in consulting services; and (d) Exemption from Registration
Claimed. These securities are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to the
provisions of Section 4(2) thereof and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public offering. This
purchaser was a sophisticated investor capable of evaluating an investment in our company.
16. (a) Securities Sold. On August 27, 2010, 500,000 shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter
or Other Purchasers. Such shares of common stock were issued to Waddell D. Loflin; (c) Consideration. Such shares
of common stock were issued as a retention bonus and were valued at $2,500; and (d) Exemption from Registration
Claimed. These securities are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to the
provisions of Section 4(2) thereof and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public offering. This
purchaser was a sophisticated investor capable of evaluating an investment in our company.
17. (a) Securities Sold. On September 10, 2010, 600,000 shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter
or Other Purchasers. Such shares of common stock were issued to Paul J. Goldman, M.D.; (c) Consideration. Such
shares of common stock were issued for $6,000 in cash; and (d) Exemption from Registration Claimed. These securities
are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2)
thereof and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated
investor capable of evaluating an investment in our company.
18. (a) Securities Sold. On September 10, 2010, 180,000 common stock purchase warrants to purchase a like
number of shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter or Other Purchasers. Such common stock purchase
warrants were issued to Paul J. Goldman, M.D.; (c) Consideration. Such common stock purchase warrants were issued
as part of a securities unit, there being no consideration assigned to such common stock purchase warrants; and (d)
Exemption from Registration Claimed. These securities are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) thereof and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving
a public offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated investor capable of evaluating an investment in our company; (e)
Terms of Conversion or Exercise. The exercise price of the common stock purchase warrants is $.10 per share. All of
the common stock purchase warrants are exercisable until September 9, 2012.
19. (a) Securities Sold. On September 27, 2010, 100,000 shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter
or Other Purchasers. Such shares of common stock were issued to James D. Luneau; (c) Consideration. Such shares of
common stock were issued for $1,000 in cash; and (d) Exemption from Registration Claimed. These securities are
exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) thereof
and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated investor
capable of evaluating an investment in our company.
20. (a) Securities Sold. On September 27, 2010, 20,000 common stock purchase warrants to purchase a like
number of shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter or Other Purchasers. Such common stock purchase
warrants were issued to James D. Luneau; (c) Consideration. Such common stock purchase warrants were issued as part
of a securities unit, there being no consideration assigned to such common stock purchase warrants; and (d) Exemption
from Registration Claimed. These securities are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) thereof and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public
offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated investor capable of evaluating an investment in our company; (e) Terms of
Conversion or Exercise. The exercise price of the common stock purchase warrants is $.10 per share. All of the common
stock purchase warrants are exercisable until September 26, 2012.
21. (a) Securities Sold. On September 28, 2010, 1,000,000 shares of common stock were issued; (b)
Underwriter or Other Purchasers. Such shares of common stock were issued to L. E. Arnold; (c) Consideration. Such
shares of common stock were issued for $10,000 in cash; and (d) Exemption from Registration Claimed. These securities
are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2)
thereof and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated
investor capable of evaluating an investment in our company.
22. (a) Securities Sold. On September 28, 2010, 200,000 common stock purchase warrants to purchase a like
number of shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter or Other Purchasers. Such common stock purchase
warrants were issued to L. E. Arnold; (c) Consideration. Such common stock purchase warrants were issued as part of
a securities unit, there being no consideration assigned to such common stock purchase warrants; and (d) Exemption from
Registration Claimed. These securities are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) thereof and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public
offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated investor capable of evaluating an investment in our company; (e) Terms of
Conversion or Exercise. The exercise price of the common stock purchase warrants is $.10 per share. All of the common
stock purchase warrants are exercisable until September 27, 2012.
23. (a) Securities Sold. On September 28, 2010, 1,000,000 shares of common stock were issued; (b)
Underwriter or Other Purchasers. Such shares of common stock were issued to FLL Shamrock, LP; (c) Consideration.
Such shares of common stock were issued for $10,000 in cash; and (d) Exemption from Registration Claimed. These
securities are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of
Section 4(2) thereof and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public offering. This purchaser was a
sophisticated investor capable of evaluating an investment in our company.
24. (a) Securities Sold. On September 28, 2010, 200,000 common stock purchase warrants to purchase a like
number of shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter or Other Purchasers. Such common stock purchase
warrants were issued to FLL Shamrock, LP; (c) Consideration. Such common stock purchase warrants were issued as
part of a securities unit, there being no consideration assigned to such common stock purchase warrants; and (d)
Exemption from Registration Claimed. These securities are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) thereof and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving
a public offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated investor capable of evaluating an investment in our company; (e)
Terms of Conversion or Exercise. The exercise price of the common stock purchase warrants is $.10 per share. All of
the common stock purchase warrants are exercisable until September 27, 2012.
25. (a) Securities Sold. On September 28, 2010, 500,000 shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter
or Other Purchasers. Such shares of common stock were issued to Blayne G. St. James; (c) Consideration. Such shares
of common stock were issued for $5,000 in cash; and (d) Exemption from Registration Claimed. These securities are
exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) thereof
and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated investor
capable of evaluating an investment in our company.
26. (a) Securities Sold. On September 28, 2010, 100,000 common stock purchase warrants to purchase a like
number of shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter or Other Purchasers. Such common stock purchase
warrants were issued to Blayne G. St. James; (c) Consideration. Such common stock purchase warrants were issued as
part of a securities unit, there being no consideration assigned to such common stock purchase warrants; and (d)
Exemption from Registration Claimed. These securities are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) thereof and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving
a public offering. This purchaser was a sophisticated investor capable of evaluating an investment in our company; (e)
Terms of Conversion or Exercise. The exercise price of the common stock purchase warrants is $.10 per share. All of
the common stock purchase warrants are exercisable until September 27, 2012.
27. (a) Securities Sold. During October, 2010, 180,000 shares of common stock were issued; (b) Underwriter
or Other Purchasers. Such shares of common stock were issued to 24 persons; (c) Consideration. Such shares of common
stock were issued for a total of $3,600 in cash, or $.02 per share; and (d) Exemption from Registration Claimed. These
securities are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of
Section 4(2) thereof and Rule 506 thereunder, as a transaction not involving a public offering. These purchasers were
investors capable of evaluating an investment in our company.
Item 16. Exhibits.
The following is a list of exhibits filed as part of this registration statement. Where so indicated by footnote,
exhibits which were previously filed are incorporated herein by reference. Any statement contained in an Incorporated
Document shall be deemed to be modified or superseded for purposes of this Registration Statement to the extent that
a statement contained herein or in any other subsequently filed Incorporated Document modifies or supersedes such
statement. Any such statement so modified or superseded shall not be deemed, except as so modified or superseded, to
constitute a part of this Registration Statement.
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Description
|
|
3.1 *
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of Louisiana Food Company.
|
|
3.2 *
|
|
Bylaws of Louisiana Food Company.
|
|
4.1 *
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate.
|
|
4.2 *
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Roy Brumbaugh.
|
|
4.3 *
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Brad A. Kinder.
|
|
4.4 *
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Douglas V. Martin.
|
|
4.5 *
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to William Huff.
|
|
4.6 *
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Clarence Farmer.
|
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Description
|
|
4.7 *
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to David Loflin.
|
|
4.8 *
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Paul J. Goldman, M.D.
|
|
4.9 *
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Newlan & Newlan.
|
|
4.10 *
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to James D. Luneau.
|
|
4.11 *
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to L. E. Arnold.
|
|
4.12 *
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to FLL Shamrock, LP.
|
|
4.13 *
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Blayne G. St. James.
|
|
5.1 *
|
|
Opinion of Newlan & Newlan, re: legality of the securities being registered.
|
|
10.1 *
|
|
Pre-incorporation Agreement and Subscription among between David Loflin,
Paul J. Goldman, M.D. and Newlan & Newlan.
|
|
10.2 *
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement between Louisiana Food Company and Roy
Brumbaugh.
|
|
10.3 *
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement between Louisiana Food Company and Brad
A. Kinder.
|
|
10.4 *
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement between Louisiana Food Company and
Douglas V. Martin.
|
|
10.5 *
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement between Louisiana Food Company and
William Huff.
|
|
10.6 *
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement between Louisiana Food Company and
Clarence Farmer.
|
|
10.7 *
|
|
Consulting Agreement between Louisiana Food Company and Rage
Marketing, Inc.
|
|
10.8 *
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement between Louisiana Food Company and James
D. Luneau.
|
|
10.9 *
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement between Louisiana Food Company and L. E.
Arnold.
|
|
10.10 *
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement between Louisiana Food Company and FLL
Shamrock, LP.
|
|
10.11 *
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement between Louisiana Food Company and
Blayne G. St. James.
|
|
10.12 *
|
|
Lease Agreement between Louisiana Food Company and Edible Enterprises.
|
|
23.2 *
|
|
Consent of Newlan & Newlan (included in Exhibit 5.1).
|
|
99.1 *
|
|
Form of Subscription Agreement.
|
Item 17. Undertakings.
(a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to:
(1) File, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment
to this registration statement to:
(i) Include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended (the “Securities Act”);
(ii) Reflect in the prospectus any facts or events which, individually or in the aggregate,
represent a fundamental change in the information in the registration statement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities
offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which
was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated
maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the
Securities and Commission (the “Commission”) pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the
aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than 20 percent
change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of
Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement.
(iii) Include any additional or changed material information on the plan of distribution.
(2) For determining liability under the Securities Act, treat each such post-effective amendment
as a new registration statement relating to the securities offered, and the offering of such
securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering.
(3) File a post-effective amendment to remove from registration by means of a post-effective
amendment any of the securities that remain unsold at the end of the offering.
(4) For determining liability of the undersigned small business issuer under the Securities Act
to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities, the undersigned small business
issuer undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned small business
issuer pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to
sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by
means of any of the following communications, the undersigned small business issuer will
be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such
purchaser:
(i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned small business issuer
relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424;
(ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the
undersigned small business issuer or used or referred to by the undersigned small
business issuer;
(iii) The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing
material information about the undersigned small business issuer or its securities
provided by or on behalf of the undersigned small business issuer; and
(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned
small business issuer to the purchaser.
(b) Provide to the underwriters at the closing specified in the underwriting agreements, certificates in such
denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt delivery
to each purchaser.
(c) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors,
officers and controlling persons of the small business issuer pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or
otherwise, the small business issuer has been advised that in the opinion of the Commission such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the
payment by the small business issuer of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling
person of the small business issuer in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is
asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered, the small business issuer will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled
by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed
by the final adjudication of such issue.
(d) (1) For determining any liability under the Securities Act, treat the information omitted from the
form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and
contained in a form of prospectus filed by the small business issuer under Rule 424(b)(1), or
(4), or 497(h) under the Securities Act as part of this registration statement as of the time the
Commission declared it effective.
(2) For determining any liability under the Securities Act, treat each post-effective amendment
that contains a form of prospectus as a new registration statement for the securities offered
in the registration statement, and that offering of the securities at that time as the initial bona
fide offering of those securities.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the registrant certifies that it has
reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form S-1 and has duly caused this
registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Norco, State
of Louisiana, on the 13th day of October, 2010.
|
|
David Loflin, President
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement has been signed
below by or on behalf of the following persons in the capacities and on the dates stated.
|
/s/ DAVID LOFLIN
|
|
|
|
October 13, 2010
|
|
David Loflin
|
|
President (Principal Executive Officer)
and Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ WADDELL D. LOFLIN
|
|
|
|
October 13, 2010
|
|
Waddell D. Loflin
|
|
Vice President, Acting Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer), Secretary, Treasurer
and Director
|
|
|