UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X]

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended   September 30, 2007

[   ]

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from [   ] to [   ]

Commission file number  000-30193

NATION ENERGY INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Wyoming		59-2887569
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Suite 900 609 West Hastings Street Vancouver British Columbia		V6B 4W4
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number  (800) 400-3969

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since the last report:  N/A

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  

Yes [ X  ]     No [  ]

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes  [  ]   No [  ]

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

[  ]

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Accelerated filer

[  ]

Non-accelerated filer

[  ]

Smaller reporting company

[X]

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [ X ]     No [ ]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO REGISTRANTS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12,13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.  Yes [   ]     No [   ]   N/A

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS)

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.  16,020,000 common shares, par value $0.001, issued and outstanding as of August 17, 2010.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

Condensed Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2007 (unaudited) and March 31, 2007

Condensed Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (unaudited)

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (unaudited)

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited)

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Item 4T.

Controls and Procedures

PART II.

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

Item 2.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities and Use of Proceeds

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Item 4.

(Removed and Reserved)

Item 5.

Other Information

Item 6.

Exhibits

Signatures

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Our unaudited interim financial statements for the six month period ended September 30, 2007 form part of this quarterly report.  They are stated in United States Dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

It is the opinion of management that the interim financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 include all adjustments necessary in order to ensure that the interim financial statements are not misleading.

Nation Energy, Inc.
Condensed Balance Sheets
ASSETS
	September 30,		March 31,
	2007		2007
	(Unaudited)
Current assets:
Cash	$       19,222		$   5,131
Accounts receivable	637,644		322,627
Prepaid expenses	5,000		192,088
Total current assets	661,866		529,846
Oil and gas properties, net - full cost method	930,326		964,703
	$  1,592,192		$  1,494,549
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$     792,717		$   876,909
Accounts payable and accrued expenses - related party	190,576		75,288
Loans payable - related party	1,056,994		781,425
Total current liabilities	2,040,287		1,733,622
Asset retirement obligation	3,387		3,040
Stockholders' deficit
Preferred stock, $.001 par value; 5,000,000
shares authorized; none outstanding	-		-
Common stock, $.001 par value; 50,000,000	16,020		16,020
shares authorized; 16,020,000 shares issued
and outstanding
Additional paid-in capital	6,868,380		6,868,380
Accumulated (deficit)	(7,107,501)		(7,054,120)
Accumulated comprehensive loss:
Foreign currency translation	(228,381)		(72,393)
	(451,482)		(242,113)
	$  1,592,192		$  1,494,549

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-1

Nation Energy, Inc.
Condensed Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
	For the Three Month Period Ended				For the Six Month Period Ended
	September 30		September 30		September 30		September 30
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Revenue:	$        56,986		$        32,193		$       113,089		$         71,213
Direct expenses:
Royalties	(16,471)		1,092		(10,392)		(5,285)
Operating	27,698		13,509		41,129		27,592
Depletion, depreciation and amortization	17,670		26,222		34,724		52,444
	28,897		40,823		65,461		74,751
Operating income (loss)	28,089		(8,630)		47,628		(3,538)
General and administrative	21,021		32,859		36,851		67,724
Income (loss) before other income (expense)	7,068		(41,489)		10,777		(71,262)
Other income (expense)
Interest expense	(39,927)		(32,143)		(73,939)		(49,171)
Miscellaneous income	-		-		9,394		-
Interest income	181		488		387		824
	(39,746)		(31,655)		(64,158)		(48,347)
Net (loss)	(32,678)		(73,144)		(53,381)		(119,609)
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)	(72,658)		7,127		(155,988)		(25,167)
Comprehensive (loss)	$       (105,336)		$        (66,017)		$     (209,369)		$     (144,776)
Per share information:
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding - basic and diluted	16,020,000		16,020,000		16,020,000		16,020,000
Net (loss) per common share - basic and diluted	$           (0.01)		$          (0.00)		$           (0.01)		$            (0.01)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-2

Nation Energy, Inc.
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
	For the Six Month Period Ended
	September 30,		September 30,
	2007		2006
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (loss)	$      (53,381)		$    (119,609)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depletion and depreciation	34,724		52,444
Foreign currency translation	(155,988)		(25,167)
Increase in loan payable due to foreign currency translation	124,111		-
Changes in working capital:
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable	(315,017)		62,081
Decrease in prepaid expenses	187,088		11,560
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable	(84,193)		38,751
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses - related party	115,288		65,452
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	(147,367)		85,512
Cash flows from investing activities:
Recovery (additions) to oil and gas properties	-		(15,427)
Net cash (used in) investing activities	-		(15,427)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from loan payable - related party	151,458		-
Payments on loan payable - related party	-		(20,351)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	151,458		(20,351)
Net increase in cash	4,091		49,734
Beginning balance, cash	15,131		58,656
Ending balance, cash	$        19,222		$      108,390
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$               -		$              -
Cash paid for income taxes	$               -		$              -

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-3

Nation Energy Inc.

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

June 30, 2007

Note 1.  Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information.  They do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation, have been included in the accompanying unaudited financial statements.  Operating results for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.  For further information, refer to the financial statements and notes thereto, included in the Company’s Form 10-K as of and for the year ended March 31, 2007.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for comparative purposes.

Note 2.  Recent Accounting Pronouncements

With the exception of those stated below, there have been no recent accounting pronouncements or changes in accounting pronouncements compared to the recent accounting pronouncements described in the Annual Report that are of material significance, or have potential material significance, to the Company.

In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“SFAS No. 162”). SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States (“the GAAP hierarchy). This Statement was effective 60 days following the Security and Exchange Commission’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”. Adoption has not had a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition.

In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active” (“FSP FAS 157-3”), to help constituents measure fair value in markets that are not active. FSP FAS 157-3 is consistent with the joint press release the FASB issued with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on September 30, 2008, which provides general clarification guidance on determining fair value under SFAS No. 157 when markets are inactive. FSP FAS 157-3 was effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements had not been issued. The adoption of FSP 157-3 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In December 2008, the SEC adopted major revisions to its rules governing oil and gas company reporting requirements. These include provisions that permit the use of new technologies to determine proved reserves and that allow companies to disclose their probable and possible reserves to investors. These disclosure requirements also require companies to report the independence and qualifications of the person primarily responsible for the preparation or audit of reserve estimates, and to file reports when a third party is relied upon to prepare or audit reserves estimates. The new rules also require that oil and gas reserves be reported and the full-cost ceiling value calculated using an average price based upon the prior 12-month period. The new oil and gas reporting requirements are effective for annual reports on Form 10-K for fiscal years ending on or after December 31, 2009, with early adoption not permitted. Adoption will not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations and financial disclosures, as we disposed of our oil and gas interests effective June 1, 2008 (see Note 7).

In April 2009, the FASB issued two FASB Staff Positions (“FSP”) intended to provide additional application guidance and enhanced disclosures regarding fair value measurements and impairments of securities.  FSP No. FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume or Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly, as codified in FASB ASC topic Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure”, provides additional guidelines for estimating fair value in accordance with FASB SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”).  Adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations and financial disclosures.

 

In June 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 855 (previously SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events”), which establishes general standards for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued or available to be issued.  It is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009.  There was no material impact on the Company’s financial statements, upon the adoption of this standard.

In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 810 (previously SFAS No. 167) for determining whether to consolidate a variable interest entity.  These amended standards eliminate a mandatory quantitative approach to determine whether a variable interest gives the entity a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity in favour of a qualitatively focused analysis, and require an ongoing reassessment of whether an entity is the primary beneficiary.  This Statement is effective for reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009.  Adoption of this ASC did not impact our financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”, as codified in FASB ASC topic “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162.  This standard establishes only two levels of GAAP, authoritative and non-authoritative.  This ASC was not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, and the Company’s adoption effective September 1, 2009, did not have any impact on its financial statements other than to modify certain existing disclosures

In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as ASC subtopic 105-10, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” as the single source of authoritative accounting principles to be applied by non-government entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, aside from those issued by the SEC. This ASU reflected the issuance of FASB Statement No. 168.   The Codification does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place.  The Codification is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, and as of the effective date, all existing accounting standard documents are superseded.  

 

In June 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-02, “Omnibus Update—Amendments to Various Topics for Technical Corrections”.  This omnibus ASU detailed amendments to various topics for technical corrections.  The adoption of ASU 2009-02 did not have a material impact on our  financial statements.

In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-03, “SEC Update — Amendments to Various Topics Containing SEC Staff Accounting Bulletins”.  This ASU updated cross-references to Codification text.  The adoption of ASU 2009-03 did not have a material impact on our  financial statements.

  In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2009-05, which amends ASC Topic 820, Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value, which provides additional guidance on the measurement of liabilities at fair value.  These amended standards clarify that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liabilities is not available, we are required to use the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, quoted prices for similar liabilities, or quoted prices for similar liabilities when traded as assets.  If these quoted prices are not available, we are required to use another valuation technique, such as income approach or a market approach.  These amended standards are effective from October 1, 2009, and do not have a significant impact on our financial statements.

In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-06, “Income Taxes” (Topic 740), ”Implementation Guidance on Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes and Disclosure Amendments for Non-public Entities”, which provides implementation guidance on accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, as well as eliminates certain disclosure requirements for non-public entities.  This update is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations since it provides only implementation and disclosure amendments.

 In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-07, “Technical Corrections to SEC Paragraphs”.  This corrected various SEC paragraphs in response to comment letters.  The adoption of ASU 2009-07 did not have material impact on our financial statements.

In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-12, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) - Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)”. This ASU amends Subtopic 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall”, to permit a reporting entity to measure the fair value of certain investments on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent). This ASU also requires new disclosures, by major category of investments including the attributes of investments within the scope of this amendment to the Codification. The guidance in this update is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

In October 2009, the FASB issued guidance on revenue recognition that will become effective for the Company beginning April 1, 2010, with earlier adoption permitted.  Under the new guidance on arrangements that include software elements, tangible products that have software components that are essential to the functionality of the tangible product will no longer be within the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance, and software-enabled products will now be subject to other relevant revenue recognition guidance.  In addition, the FASB issued guidance on revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables that are outside the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance.  Under the new guidance, when vendor specific objective evidence or third party evidence for deliverables in an arrangement cannot be determined, a best estimate of the selling price is required to separate deliverables and allocate arrangements consideration using the relative selling price method.  The new guidance includes new disclosure requirements on how the application of the relative selling price method affects the timing and amount of revenue recognition.  Adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 “Fair Market Value Measurements and Disclosures” (Topic 820) “Improving Dislcosures about Fair Value Measurements”.  This ASU requires some new disclosures and clarifies some existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement as set forth in ASC Subtopic 820-10.  The FASB’s objective is to improve these disclosures and, thus, increase the transparency in financial reporting.  The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-03, “Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation and Disclosures” (“ASU 2010-03”), which provides amendments to ASC topic “Extractive Activities-Oil and Gas”. The objective of ASU 2010-03 is to align the oil and gas reserve estimation and disclosure requirements of the ASC with the requirements in the SEC’s “Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting: Final Rule”. Similar to the SEC requirements, the FASB requirements were effective for periods ending on or after December 31, 2009.  The SEC introduced a new definition of oil and gas producing activities which allows companies to include volumes in their reserve base from unconventional resources.  The FASB also addresses the impact of changes in the SEC’s rules and definitions on accounting for oil and gas producing activities.  Initial adoption did not have an impact on our Company’s financial statements as we had sold our oil and gas interests prior to adoption.  

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-04, “Accounting for Various Topics – Technical Corrections to SEC Paragraphs“. ASU 2010-04 makes technical corrections to existing SEC guidance, including the following topics: accounting for subsequent investments, termination of an interest rate swap, issuance of financial statements - subsequent events, use of residential method to value acquired assets other than goodwill, adjustments in assets and liabilities for holding gains and losses, and selections of discount rate used for measuring defined benefit obligation. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-04 to have a material impact on its financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” (“ASU 2010-06”), which provides amendments to ASC topic “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”. This will provide more robust disclosures about (i) the different classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, (ii) the valuation techniques and inputs used, (iii) the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, and (iv) the transfers between Levels 1, 2 and 3.  ASU 2010-06 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2009.  The Company is currently assessing the impact that the adoption will have on its disclosures.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09 (ASU 2010-09), "Subsequent Events (Topic 855)."  The amendments remove the requirements for an SEC filer to disclose a date, in both issued and revised financial statements, through which subsequent events have been reviewed.  Revised financial statements include financial statements revised as a result of either correction of an error or retrospective application of U.S. GAAP.  ASU 2010-09 is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2010.  The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-09 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-12. “Income Taxes” (Topic 740). ASU No.2010-12 amends FASB Accounting Standard Codification subtopic 740-10 “Income Taxes” to include paragraph 740-10-S99-4. On March 30, 2010 The President signed the “Health Care & Education Affordable Care Act” reconciliation bill that amends its previous Act signed on March 23, 2010. FASB ASC topic 740, “Income Taxes”, requires the measurement of current and deferred tax liabilities and assets to be based on provisions of enacted tax law. The effects of future changes in tax laws are not anticipated.” Therefore, the different enactment dates of the Act and reconciliation measure may affect registrants with a period-end that falls between March 23, 2010 (enactment date of the Act), and March 30, 2010 (enactment date of the reconciliation measure). However, the announcement states that the SEC would not object if such registrants were to account for the enactment of both the Act and the reconciliation measure in a period ending on or after March 23, 2010, but notes that the SEC staff “does not believe that it would be appropriate for registrants to analogize to this view in any other fact patterns.” The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-14, "Accounting for Extractive Activities — Oil & Gas."  ASU 2010-14 amends paragraph 932-10-S99-1 due to SEC Release No. 33-8995, "Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting”.  The amendments to the guidance on oil and gas accounting are effective August 31, 2010, and will not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, as effective June 1, 2008, the Company sold its oil and gas properties in the Smoky Hill Area of Alberta, Canada (see Note 7).

In May 2010, the FASB issued ASU  2010-19 (ASU 2010-19), “Foreign Currency (Topic 830): Foreign Currency Issues: Multiple Foreign Currency Exchange Rates”. The amendments in this update are effective as of the announcement date of March 18, 2010. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-19 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

There were various other updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or application to specific industries and are not expected to a have a material impact on the Company's  financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Note 3.  Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern.  The Company has incurred losses since inception of $7,074,823 and has working capital and stockholder (deficits) of ($1,290,754) and ($346,146, respectively) at June 30, 2007, and ($1,203,776) and ($242,113), respectively at March 31, 2007. The Company is reliant on raising capital to initiate its business plan.  The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon being able to secure financing and attain profitable operations.  

The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

Note 4.  Earnings Per Share

The Company calculates net income (loss) per share as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 128, “Earnings per Share.”  Basic earnings (loss) per share are calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.  Diluted earnings (loss) per share are calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding.  During the periods presented, common stock equivalents were not considered, as their effect would be anti-dilutive.  

Note 5.   Oil and Gas Properties

Periodically, but at least annually, the Company will evaluate the economic recoverabilty of its proved oil and gas properties.  For the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company recorded a ceiling test write-down of $555,085.  As of June 30, 2007, management determined that there was no further impairment of their proved oil and gas properties.  Effective June 1, 2008, the Company sold its oil and gas properties in the Smoky Hill Area of Alberta, Canada, and as of such date is considered a shell company (see Note 7).

Note 6.  Related Party Transactions

During March 2002, the Company entered into a verbal agreement with a related party, Caravel Management Corp (“Caravel”) in which Caravel will provide management services on a month-to-month basis.  Total expenses recognized under this agreement for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were $12,720 and $12,840, respectively, for each of the periods.  

Note 7.   Subsequent Events   

All material subsequent events from the date of the balance sheet through the date of issuance of these financial statements, have been disclosed below.

a)

On September 18, 2008 the Company entered into, jointly with Netco Energy, a Sale and Purchase Agreement with EnCana Oil and Gas (“EnCana”) to sell their assets in the Smoky Area of Alberta for a total net price of Cdn $1,600,000.  The transaction was arm’s length and was effective June 1, 2008.  The Company’s net proceeds from the sale amounted to Cdn $1,095,000 (US $941,935).

b)

On October 16, 2008 and November 18, 2008 the Company repaid a portion of the Demand Note in the amounts of Cdn $545,000 (US $505,847) and Cdn $420,000 (US $397,201) respectively.

c)

On January 1, 2009 the Company entered into a written agreement revising the previous verbal agreement with Caravel. The agreement now provides for administrative services, office rent and supplies for $7,865 per month.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward Looking Statements

This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements.  Forward-looking statements are projections of events, revenues, income, future economic performance or management’s plans and objectives for our future operations.    In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may", "should", "expects", "plans", "anticipates", "believes", "estimates", "predicts", "potential" or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology.  These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled "Risk Factors" and the risks set out below, any of which may cause our or our or our industry's actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.  These risks include, by way of example and not in limitation:

·

risks and uncertainties relating to the interpretation of drill results, the geology, range and continuity of mineral deposits;

·

results of initial feasibility, pre-feasibility and feasibility studies, and the possibility that future exploration, development or mining results will not be consistent with our expectations;

·

mining and development risks, including risks related to accidents, equipment breakdowns, labour disputes or other unanticipated difficulties with or interruptions in production;

·

the potential for delays in exploration or development activities or the completion of feasibility studies;

·

risks related to the inherent uncertainty of production and cost estimates and the potential for unexpected costs and expenses;

·

risks related to commodity price fluctuations;

·

the uncertainty of profitability based upon our history of losses;

·

risks related to failure to obtain adequate financing on a timely basis and on acceptable terms for our planned exploration and development projects;

·

risks related to environmental regulation and liability;

·

risks that the amounts reserved or allocated for environmental compliance, reclamation, post-closure control measures, monitoring and on-going maintenance may not be sufficient to cover such costs;

·

risks related to tax assessments;

·

political and regulatory risks associated with mining development and exploration; and

·

other risks and uncertainties related to our prospects, properties and business strategy.

This list is not an exhaustive list of the factors that may affect any of our forward-looking statements.  These and other factors should be considered carefully and readers should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements.

Forward looking statements are made based on management’s beliefs, estimates, and opinions on the date the statements are made and we undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements if these beliefs, estimates and opinions or other circumstances should change.  Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performances or achievements.  Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

Our financial statements are stated in United States Dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”).

As used in this quarterly report, the terms "we", "us", "our", and "Nation Energy" mean Nation Energy Inc., unless otherwise indicated.

In this quarterly report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States dollars and all references to “common shares” refer to the common shares in our capital stock.

Our Current Business

Sale of Bolton Property

On September 18, 2008, Nation Energy, Netco Energy Inc., and EnCana entered into a Petroleum, Natural Gas and Related Rights Conveyance pursuant to which Nation and Netco sold all of their interests in the leases and lands comprising the Bolton Property to EnCana.  As a condition of the agreement, EnCana agreed to terminate the payable owing by Nation to EnCana as successor in interest to Churchill Energy (as successor to Accrete Energy, Olympia Energy’s successor) pursuant to a participation agreement between the parties dated November 21, 2001.  In connection with the sale of the Bolton properties on September 26, 2008 we entered into a termination agreement with EnCana pursuant to which we agreed to terminate the Joint Operating Agreement between Nation, High Point Resources Inc. and Churchill Energy (as Olympia Energy’s successor) effective June 1, 2008 and assigned all of our rights under all operating contracts relating to the Bolton Property to EnCana.  The sale of the oil and gas assets closed on September 30, 2008 with a second closing in April 2009 for total net proceeds to Nation of CDN $1,095,000 (US $941,935).  

The proceeds of the sale of the Bolton Property were used to partially repay amounts owed to Caravel Management Corp. under a promissory note dated March 31, 2006 in the amount of CDN $980,905 (US $840,464).  Caravel Management Corp, is a private management services company wholly-owned by our sole director and officer.  As of September 30, 2007, the remaining principal and accrued interest due to Caravel totalled CDN $1,313,622 (US $1,247,570).

We currently have no business and operate as a shell company.  We are in the process of evaluating the merits of joint venture opportunities in the resource sector.  

General

The following is a discussion and analysis of our plan of operation for the six month period ended September 30, 2007, and the factors that could affect our future financial condition.  This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this quarterly report.  Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles.  All references to dollar amounts in this section are in United States dollars unless expressly stated otherwise.

Plan of Operation

For the next twelve months we plan to continue to evaluate joint venture opportunities and oil and gas development and production opportunities.  

Cash Requirements During the Next Twelve Months

Over the next twelve months we intend to use funds to evaluate new business acquisitions, as follows:

General and Administrative			$70,000
Professional Fees		60,000
Total		$130,000

We have suffered recurring losses from operations prior to fiscal 2005.  The continuation of our company as a going concern is dependent upon our company attaining and maintaining profitable operations and raising additional capital as needed.  Management’s plan in this regard is to raise additional capital through a debt or an equity offering.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recovery and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should our company discontinue operations.  

Due to the uncertainty of our ability to meet our current operating expenses noted above, in their report on the annual financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2007, our independent auditors included an explanatory paragraph regarding concerns about our ability to continue as a going concern.  Our financial statements contain additional note disclosure describing the circumstances that lead to this disclosure by our independent auditors.

The continuation of our business is dependent upon obtaining further financing, a successful program of exploration, and, finally achieving a profitable level of operations.  The issuance of additional equity securities by us could result in a significant dilution in the equity interests of our current stockholders.  Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase our liabilities and future cash commitments.  

There are no assurances that we will be able to obtain further funds required for our continued operations.  We are pursuing various financing alternatives to meet our immediate and long-term financial requirements.  There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us when needed or, if available, that it can be obtained on commercially reasonable terms.  If we are not able to obtain the additional financing on a timely basis, we will be unable to conduct our operations as planned and we will not be able to meet our other obligations as they become due.  In such event, we will be forced to scale down or perhaps even cease our operations.

Disclosure of Outstanding Share Data

As at the date of this quarterly report, we had 16,020,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.  We do not have any warrants, options or shares of any other class issued and outstanding as at the date of this quarterly report.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006

The following summary of our results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, which are included herein.

Our operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2007, for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and the changes between those periods for the respective items are summarized as follows:

	Three Months Ended  September 30, 2007	Three Months Ended September 30, 2006	Difference Increase/(Decrease) %
Revenue	$56,986	$32,193	77%
Depletion, depreciation and amortization	$17,670	$26,222	(32.6)%
General and administrative	$21,021	$32,859	(36)%
Interest expense	$39,927	$32,143	24.2%
Oil and gas operating expenses	$27,698	$13,509	105%
Royalties	$(16,471)	$1,092	(1608.3)%
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)	$(72,658)	$7,127	(1119.5)%
Interest income	$181	$488	(62.9)%
Net loss	$(32,678)	$(73,144)	(55.3)%

We generated a net loss of ($32,678) for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to a net loss of ($73,144) for the three months ended September 30, 2006.  Net loss per common share for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was $.01  per common share for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and $Nil per common share September 30, 2006.  

Revenues increased to $56,986 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 from $32,193 for the three months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in revenues paid was partly due to prior period revenue adjustments and an increase in the volumes sold.  Royalty credits totalled ($16,471) for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 compared to royalties expenses of $1,092 for the three months ended September 30, 2006.  Operating expenses increased to $27,698 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 from $13,509 for the same period in 2006.    

Depletion, depreciation and amortization expense totalled $17,670 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $26,222 for the three months ended September 30, 2006.  Depletion expense decreased for the three months ended primarily due to a correction of estimates done previously. Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2007 totalled $39,927 compared to $32,143 for the three months ended September 30, 2006.  The increase reflected higher loan balances in the quarter ended September 30, 2007.

We reported a foreign currency translation loss of ($72,658) for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to translation gains of $7,127 during the same three month period in fiscal 2007.  Our revenues and expenses are incurred in Canadian dollars while the reporting currency is the US dollar.  The continuing rise in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the US dollar resulted in a foreign currency translation loss primarily as a result of our loans payable being due in Canadian dollars.  

The major components of our general and administrative expenses for the three month period are outlined in the table below:

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2007	Three Months Ended September 30, 2006	Difference Increase/(Decrease)  %
Administration fees	$12,720	$12,720	Nil%
Legal fees	$2,459	$3,853	(36.2)%
Office & MIS	$3,642	$4,561	(20.1)%
Transfer Agent & Filing Fees	$Nil	$25	(100)%
Accounting	$2,200	$11,700	(81.2)%
Total Expenses	$21,021	$32,859	(36)%

General and administrative expenses decreased to $21,021 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 from $32,859 in fiscal 2007.  General expenses included administration fees remaining the same, $12,720 for both the three month period ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.  Office and Management Information System fees decreased from $4,561 in the quarter ending September 30, 2006 to $3,642 in the same period ending September 30, 2007.    Legal fees decreased to $2,459 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 from $3,853 in the three months ended September 30, 2006.  Filing fees and transfer agent fees fell to $Nil as a result of fewer filings completed during the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $25 in the same period ended September 30, 2006.  Accounting fees also decreased due in part to fewer completed financial statement filings in the period.  Fees were estimated and accrued for in the period ended September 30, 2007 totalling $2,200 versus estimated accruals and actual payments in the prior period ended September 30, 2006 totalling $11,700.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – Six Months Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006

The following summary of our results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, which are included herein.

Our operating results for the six months ended September 30, 2007, for the six months ended September 30, 2006 and the changes between those periods for the respective items are summarized as follows:

	Six Months Ended  September 30, 2007	Six Months Ended September 30, 2006	Difference Increase/(Decrease) %
Revenue	$113,089	$71,213	58.8%
Depletion, depreciation and amortization	$34,724	$52,444	(33.8)%
General and administrative	$36,851	$67,724	(45.6)%
Interest expense	$73,939	$49,171	50.4%
Oil and gas operating expenses	$41,129	$27,592	49.1%
Royalty credits	$(10,392)	$(5,285)	96.6%
Foreign currency translation loss	$(155,988)	$(25,167)	519.8%
Interest income	$387	$824	(53)%
Miscellaneous income	$9,394	$Nil	100%
Net loss	$(53,381)	$(119,609)	(55.4)%

We generated a net loss of ($53,381) for the six months ended September 30, 2007 compared to a net loss of ($119,609) for the six months ended September 30, 2006.  Net loss per common share for the six months ended September 30, 2007 was ($.01) compared to ($0.01) per common share for the six months ended September 30, 2006.  Revenues increased to $113,089 for the six months ended September 30, 2007 from $71,213 for the six months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in revenues paid was partly due to prior period sales adjustments and higher volumes sold during the current period.  Royalty credits of $10,392 were reported for the period ending September 30, 2007 increasing from a credit for royalties paid of $5,285 for the six months ended September 30, 2006.  Operating expenses increased to $41,129 for the six months ended September 30, 2007 from $27,592 for the same period in 2006.    

Depletion, depreciation and amortization expense totalled $34,724 for the six months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $52,444 for the six months ended September 30, 2006.  

Interest expense for the six months ended September 30, 2007 totalled $73,989 compared to $49,171 for the six months ended September 30, 2006.  The increase reflected higher loan balances in the quarter ended September 30, 2007.

 We reported a foreign currency translation loss of ($155,988) for the six months ended September 30, 2007 compared to a loss of ($25,167) during the same six month period in fiscal 2007.  Our revenues and expenses are incurred in Canadian dollars while the reporting currency is the US dollar.  The continuing rise in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the US dollar resulted in a foreign currency translation loss primarily as a result of our loans payable being due in Canadian dollars.  

The major components of our general and administrative expenses for the six month periods are outlined in the table below:

  

	Six Months Ended September 30, 2007	Six Months Ended September 30, 2006	Difference Increase/(Decrease)  %
Administration fees	$25,440	$25,560	(0.5)%
Legal fees	$2,577	$7,254	(64.5)%
Office & MIS	$4,697	$14,908	(68.5)%
Transfer Agent & Filing Fees	$37	$6,502	(994)%
Accounting	$4,100	$13,500	(69.6)%
Total Expenses	$36,851	$67,724	(45.6)%

General and administrative expenses decreased to $36,851 for the six months ended September 30, 2007 from $67,724 in fiscal 2007.  General expenses included a slight decrease in administration fees from $25,560 to $25,440 for the six month period ended September 30, 2007.  Office and Management Information System fees fell from $14,908 in the quarter ended September 30, 2006 to $4,697 in the same period ended September 30, 2007 primarily due to the acquisition of an oil and gas management reporting system during the period ended September 30, 2006, that was subsequently abandoned.    Legal fees decreased to $2,577 for the six months ended September 30, 2007 from $7,254 in the six months ended September 30, 2006.  Filing fees and transfer agent fees fell to $37 as a result of fewer filings completed during the six months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $6,502 in the same period ended September 30, 2006.  Accounting fees also decreased due to fewer completed financial filings in the period ended September 30, 2007.  Fees were estimated and accrued for in the period totalling $4,100 compared to estimated accruals and actual costs in the period ended September 30, 2006 totalling $13,500.

Liquidity and Financial Condition

Working Capital

	At September 30, 2007	At March 31, 2007
Current Assets	$661,866	$529,846
Current Liabilities	$2,040,287	$1,733,622
Working Capital Deficiency	($1,378,421)	($1,203,776)

Cash Flows

	Six Months Ended September 30, 2007	Six Months Ended September 30, 2006
Cash flows (used in )provided by Operating Activities	$(147,367)	$85,512
Cash flows (used in) provided by Financing Activities	$151,458	$(20,351)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	$(155,988)	$(25,167)
Net increase in Cash	$4,091	$49,734

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $147,367 in the six months ended September 30, 2007 compared with net cash provided by operating activities of $85,512 in the same period in 2006.  The increase in cash used in operating activities of $232,879 is mainly attributed to an increase in accounts receivable and increased losses on foreign exchange for the period.  Operating losses decreased $66,228 in the six month period ended September 30, 2007 over the six months ended September 30, 2006.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $151,458 in six months ended September 30, 2007 compared to ($20,351) used in financing activities in the same period in 2006.  The difference resulted from a payment made on the loan in 2006 compared to an additional loan of $151,458 during the same period in 2007.  

Oil and gas sales volume comparisons for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006

Revenues increased to $56,986 for the three month period ended September 30, 2007 compared to $32,193 for the three months ended September 30, 2006.  The increase is primarily due to prior period sales adjustments and higher volumes in the second quarter ended September 30, 2007.  Despite lower average gas prices, average prices which fell to $4.96 per Mcf in during the second quarter of fiscal 2008 from $5.10 per Mcf for the same period in fiscal 2006, we produced 9.87 MMcf of natural gas in the quarter ended September 30, 2007 compared to 9.74 MMcf in the second quarter of fiscal 2006.

Loans Payable

On March 31, 2006, we entered into a revised loan agreement with a related party.  The loan bears interest at 15% per annum, calculated and compounded monthly and payable quarterly.  Any principal amount outstanding under the loan is payable upon demand.  The loan payable is in Canadian dollars and is secured by a Promissory Note.  As of September 30, 2007, the balance of the loan and accrued interest payable was $1,216,081 compared to $882,310 at September 30, 2006.  During the quarter ended September 30, 2007, we borrowed an additional CDN $160,000 (US$151,458) and together with interest the balance of the loan and accrued interest was CDN $1,313,622 (US $1,247,570).  During the year ended March 31, 2009 we paid a total of CDN $985,655 (US$782,142) and together with interest the balance at March 31, 2009 of principal and accrued interest totalled CDN $477,175 (US $378,650).  During the year ended March 31, 2010 we paid an additional CDN $20,000 with accrued interest brought the total loan balance to CDN $566,652 (US $534,275) at March 31, 2010.

Going Concern

The audited financial statements accompanying our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007 have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies that our company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business.  Our company has incurred losses since inception in excess of $7 million and has only generated modest profitable operations when we commenced gas production in fiscal 2006.  We have relied solely on the shareholder advances to participate and continue operations.  

Our company’s ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon being able to secure financing and attain profitable operations.  Our company is currently evaluating business opportunities and will require financing for acquisition of any new business venture.    

Net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended September 30, 2007 totalled $147,367 versus net cash provided by operating activities of $85,512 for the six month period ended September 30, 2006.  Cash balances totalled $19,222 at September 30, 2007 compared to $15,131 at March 31, 2007.  

We entered into bridge loan agreements with a related party in 2003 and 2004 to fund operations.  The terms of these bridge loan agreements provided that any principal amount outstanding is payable upon demand and bears interest at 15% per annum, payable quarterly.  On March 31, 2006, we consolidated and restructured our loans with the related party.  As part of the restructuring, we borrowed an additional CDN $250,000 (US$203,932).  The new loan bears interest at 15% per annum, calculated and compounded monthly and is payable quarterly.  Any principal amount outstanding under the loan is payable upon demand.  The loan is payable in Canadian dollars and is secured by a Promissory Note.   

We paid down $46,976 under this facility in fiscal 2007 compared to borrowing proceeds of $296,700 in fiscal 2006.  During fiscal 2006 we also paid down a total of $223,970 resulting in net increase of $72,730.  During the six months ended September 30, 2007 we borrowed an additional $151,458 funds.  The balances outstanding under the loan agreement totalled $1,247,570 at September 30 2007 versus an aggregate of $882,310 at September 30, 2006.  At June 30, 2010 the balance of the principal and accrued interest was CDN $556,652 (US$534,275).

We have limited operating history.  We can only estimate future needs for capital based on the current status of our operations, our current plans and current economic condition.  Due to the uncertainties regarding our future activities, we are unable to predict precisely what amount will be used for any particular purpose.  

Future Financings   

As of July 31, 2010, we had cash of US $14,257.  We currently do not have sufficient funds to acquire and develop any future joint ventures.  We anticipate continuing to rely on shareholder loans or equity sales of our common stock in order to fund our business operations.   Issuances of additional shares will result in dilution to our existing stockholders.  There is no assurance that we will achieve any additional sales of our equity or arrange for more debt or other financing to fund any future activities.  

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no  off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to stockholders.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLSOURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 4 (T).   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As required by Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, our principal executive officer and financial officer evaluated our company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as define in Rules 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and financial officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, these disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by our company in reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities Exchange Commission and to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our company’s management, including our principal executive officer and financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  The conclusion that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective was due to the presence of the following material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting which are indicative of many small companies with small staff:  (i) lack of a sufficient number of independent directors for our board and audit committee.  We currently have no independent director on our board, which is comprised of one director.  As a publicly-traded company, we strive to have a majority of our board of directors be independent; (ii) inadequate segregation of duties and effective risk assessment; and (iii) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of both United States generally accepted accounting principles and Securities and Exchange Commission guidelines.  Management anticipates that such disclosure controls and procedures will not be effective until the material weaknesses are remediated.

We plan to take steps to enhance and improve the design of our internal controls over financial reporting.  During the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10Q, we have not been able to remediate the material weaknesses identified above.  To remediate such weaknesses, we plan to implement the following changes during our fiscal year ending March 31, 2010, subject to obtaining additional financing:  (i) appoint qualified personnel to address inadequate segregation of duties and ineffective risk management; and (ii) adopt sufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting.  The remediation efforts set out above are largely dependent upon our securing additional financing to cover the costs of implementing the changes required.  If we are unsuccessful in securing such funds, remediation efforts may be adversely affected in a material manner.

It should be noted that while our management believes our disclosure controls and procedures provide reasonable level of assurance, they do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud.  A control system, no matter how well conceived or operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.  Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.  Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected.  These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.  Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls.  The design of any system of internal control is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.  Over time controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.   Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three month period ended September 30, 2007 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We know of no material, existing or pending legal proceedings against our company, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation.  There are no proceedings in which any of our director and officer or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial stockholder is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest.

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

Much of the information included in this quarterly report includes or is based upon estimates, projections or other "forward looking statements".  Such forward looking statements include any projections or estimates made by us and our management in connection with our past or future business operations.  While these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect our current judgement regarding the direction of our business, actual results will almost always vary, sometimes materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future performance suggested herein.

Such estimates, projections or other "forward looking statements" involve various risks and uncertainties as outlined below.  We caution the reader that important factors in some cases have affected and, in the future, could materially affect actual results and cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed in any such estimates, projections or other "forward looking statements".

Our shares of common stock are considered speculative while we continue our search for a new business opportunity.  Prospective investors should consider carefully the risk factors set out below.

Because of the early stage of development and the nature of our business, our securities are considered highly speculative.

Our securities must be considered highly speculative, generally because of the nature of our business and the early stage of our development. We were engaged in the business of exploring and, if warranted, developing commercial reserves of oil and gas. Our properties were in the exploration, development and production stage and had proven reserves of oil and gas as of June 30, 2007.  Accordingly, we realized limited revenues and profit from our operations.  Any profitability in the future  will be dependent upon acquiring a new business opportunity.  

A decline in the price of our common stock could affect our ability to raise further working capital and adversely impact our operations.

A prolonged decline in the price of our common stock could result in a reduction in the liquidity of our common stock and a reduction in our ability to raise capital.  Any reduction in our ability to raise equity capital in the future could have a significant negative effect on our business plans and our ability to develop new products.  If our stock price declines, we may not be able to raise additional capital sufficient to acquire new business.

Our accounts are subject to currency fluctuations which may materially affect our financial position and results of operations.

We maintain our accounts in US and Canadian currencies and are therefore subject to currency fluctuations and such fluctuations may materially affect our financial position and results of operations. We do not engage in currency hedging activities.

We may not be able to manage the significant strains that future growth may place on our administration infrastructure, systems and controls.

In the event we are able to acquire a new joint venture and experience any rapid expansion over current levels, we could experience rapid growth in revenues, personnel, complexity of administration and in other areas.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to manage the significant strains that future growth may place on our administrative infrastructure, systems, and controls.  If we are unable to manage future growth effectively, our business, operating results and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.

The loss of John Hislop would have an adverse impact on future development and could impair our ability to succeed.

We are dependent on our ability to hire and retain highly skilled and qualified personnel. We face competition for qualified personnel from numerous industry sources, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to attract and retain qualified personnel on acceptable terms. We do not have key man insurance on our employees. The loss of service of Mr. Hislop could have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial condition.

Our management currently engages in other oil and gas businesses and, as a result, conflicts could arise.

In addition to their interest in our company, our management currently engages, and intends to engage in the future, in the oil and gas business independently of our company. As a result, conflicts of interest between us and management of our company might arise.

Trading of our stock may be restricted by the SEC’s “Penny Stock” regulations which may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted regulations which generally define “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions.  Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to person other than established customers and “accredited investors.”  The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse.  The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the SEC which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market.  The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account.  The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and sales person compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation.  In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules; the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction.  These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules.  Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities.  We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of our common stock.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, has adopted sales practice requirements which may also limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer.  Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information.  Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers.  FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

Since our shares are thinly traded, and trading on the OTC Bulletin Board may be limited and sporadic because it is not an exchange, stockholders may have difficulty reselling their shares or liquidating their investments.

Our shares of common stock are currently listed for public trading on the Pink OTC Markets Inc.   The trading price of our shares of common stock has been subject to wide fluctuations.  Trading prices of our shares of common stock may fluctuate in response to a number of factors, many of which will be beyond our control.  The stock market has generally experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of companies with no current business operation.  There can be no assurance that trading prices and price earnings ratios previously experienced by our shares of common stock will be matched or maintained.  These broad market and industry factors may adversely affect the market price of our shares of common stock, regardless of our operating performance.

In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company's securities, securities class-action litigation has often been instituted.  Such litigation, if instituted, could result in substantial costs for us and a diversion of management's attention and resources.

Our By-laws contain provisions indemnifying our officers and directors against all costs, charges and expenses incurred by them.

Our By-laws contain provisions with respect to the indemnification of our officers and directors against all costs, charges and expenses, including an amount paid to settle an action or satisfy a judgment, actually and reasonably incurred by him, including an amount paid to settle an action or satisfy a judgement in a civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding to which he is made a party by reason of his being or having been one of our directors or officers to  the maximum extent permitted by Wyoming law.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of our company under Wyoming law or otherwise, we have been advised that the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission is that such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable.

Investors’ interests in our company will be diluted and investors may suffer dilution in their net book value per share if we issue additional shares or raise funds through the sale of equity securities.

Our constating documents authorize the issuance of 50,000,000 shares of common stock, each with a par value of $0.001.  In the event that we are required to issue any additional shares or enter into private placements to raise financing through the sale of equity securities, investors' interests in our company will be diluted and investors may suffer dilution in their net book value per share depending on the price at which such securities are sold.  If we issue any such additional shares, such issuances also will cause a reduction in the proportionate ownership and voting power of all other shareholders.  Further, any such issuance may result in a change in our control.

Our by-laws do not contain anti-takeover provisions which could result in a change of our management and directors if there is a take-over of our company.

We do not currently have a shareholder rights plan or any anti-takeover provisions in our By-laws.  Without any anti-takeover provisions, there is no deterrent for a take-over of our company, which may result in a change in our management and directors.

Since our director and officer is not a resident of the United States, investors may find it difficult to enforce, within the United States, any judgments obtained against our company or our director and officer.

We do not currently maintain a permanent place of business within the United States. In addition, our director and officer is not a resident of the United States.  As a result, it may be difficult for investors to enforce within the United States any judgments obtained against our company or our officers or directors, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof.

Risks Relating to the Industry

As our properties were primarily in the exploration and, development stage there can be no assurance that we will establish further commercial discoveries.

Exploration for economic reserves of oil and gas is subject to a number of risk factors.  While the rewards to an investor can be substantial if an economically viable discovery is made, few of the properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing oil and/or gas wells.  There can be no assurance that we will establish further commercial discoveries.

A decline in oil and natural gas prices would have an adverse impact on our operations.

Our revenues, cash flows and profitability were substantially dependent upon prevailing prices for oil and natural gas.  In recent years, oil and natural gas prices and, therefore, the level of drilling, exploration, development and production, have been extremely volatile.  Any significant or extended decline in oil or natural gas prices would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could impair access to future sources of capital.  Volatility in the oil and natural gas industry results from numerous factors, over which we have no control, including:

·

the level of oil and natural gas prices, expectations about future oil and natural gas prices and the ability of international cartels to set and maintain production levels and prices;

·

the cost of exploring for, producing and transporting oil and natural gas;

·

the domestic and foreign supply of oil and natural gas;

·

domestic and foreign governmental regulation;

·

the level and price of foreign oil and natural gas transportation;

·

available pipeline and other oil and natural gas transportation capacity;

·

weather conditions;

·

international political, military, regulatory and economic conditions;

·

the level of consumer demand;

·

the price and the availability of alternative fuels;

·

the effect of worldwide energy conservation measures; and

·

the ability of oil and natural gas companies to raise capital.

Significant declines in oil and natural gas prices for an extended period may:

·

impair our financial condition, liquidity, ability to finance future plans;

·

reduce the amount of oil and natural gas that we could produce economically;

·

cause us to delay or postpone some of our capital projects;

·

reduce our revenues, operating income and cash flow; and

·

reduce the carrying value of oil and natural gas properties.

No assurance can be given that current levels of oil and natural gas prices will continue.  We expect oil and natural gas prices, as well as the oil and natural gas industry generally, to continue to be volatile.

Continued financial success depends on our ability to replace our reserves in the future.

Our future success depends upon our ability to find, develop and acquire oil and natural gas reserves that are profitable.  Oil and natural gas are depleting assets, and production from oil and natural gas from properties declines as reserves are depleted with the rate of decline depending on reservoir characteristics.  If we are unable to conduct successful exploration or development activities or acquire properties containing proved reserves our cash flows will be adversely affected.  Acquiring reserves through exploration or development activities or acquisitions will require significant capital which may not be available to us.

Reserve estimates depend on many assumptions that may turn out to be inaccurate.

The process of estimating natural gas and oil reserves is complex.  It requires interpretations of available technical data and various assumptions, including assumptions relating to economic factors.  Any significant inaccuracies in these interpretations or assumptions could materially affect the estimated quantities and present value of reserves shown in this annual report.  In order to prepare these estimates, we must project production rates and timing of development expenditures.  We must also analyze available geological, geophysical, production and engineering data, and the extent, quality and reliability of this data can vary.  The process also requires economic assumptions relating to matters such as oil and natural gas prices, drilling and operating expenses, capital expenditures, taxes and availability of funds.

Actual future production, oil and natural gas prices, revenues, taxes, development expenditures, operating expenses and quantities of recoverable oil and natural gas reserves most likely will vary from our estimates.  Any significant variance could materially affect the estimated quantities and pre-tax net present value of reserves shown in this annual  report.  In addition, we may adjust estimates of proved reserves to reflect production history, results of exploration and development, prevailing oil and natural gas prices and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.

The potential profitability of oil and gas ventures depends upon factors beyond the control of our company.

The potential profitability of oil and gas properties is dependent upon many factors beyond our control.  For instance, world prices and markets for oil and gas are unpredictable, highly volatile, potentially subject to governmental fixing, pegging, controls, or any combination of these and other factors, and respond to changes in domestic, international, political, social, and economic environments.  Additionally, due to worldwide economic uncertainty, the availability and cost of funds for production and other expenses have become increasingly difficult, if not impossible, to project.  These changes and events may materially affect our financial performance.

Adverse weather conditions can also hinder drilling operations.  A productive well may become uneconomic in the event water or other deleterious substances are encountered which impair or prevent the production of oil and/or gas from the well.  In addition, production from any well may be unmarketable if it is impregnated with water or other deleterious substances.  The marketability of oil and gas which may be acquired or discovered will be affected by numerous factors beyond our control.  These factors include the proximity and capacity of oil and gas pipelines and processing equipment, market fluctuations of prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, allowable production and environmental protection. The extent of these factors cannot be accurately predicted but the combination of these factors may result in our company not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.

Competition in the oil and gas industry is highly competitive and there is no assurance that we will be successful in acquiring desirable oil and gas leases.

The oil and gas industry is intensely competitive. We compete with numerous individuals and companies, including many major oil and gas companies, which have substantially greater technical, financial and operational resources and staffs.  Accordingly, there is a high degree of competition for desirable oil and gas leases, suitable properties for drilling operations and necessary drilling equipment, as well as for access to funds.  We cannot predict if the necessary funds can be raised or that any project work will be completed.  Acreage may not become available or if it is available for leasing we may not be successful in acquiring the leases.

 The marketability of natural resources will be affected by numerous factors beyond our control which may result in us not receiving an adequate return on invested capital to be profitable or viable.

The marketability of natural resources which may be acquired or discovered by us will be affected by numerous factors beyond our control.  These factors include market fluctuations in oil and gas pricing and demand, the proximity and capacity of natural resource markets and processing equipment, governmental regulations, land tenure, land use, regulation concerning the importing and exporting of oil and gas and environmental protection regulations.  The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in us not receiving an adequate return on invested capital to be profitable or viable.

Oil and gas operations are subject to comprehensive regulation which may cause substantial delays or require capital outlays in excess of those anticipated causing an adverse effect on our company.

Oil and gas operations are subject to federal and local laws relating to the protection of the environment, including laws regulating removal of natural resources from the ground and the discharge of materials into the environment.  Oil and gas operations are also subject to federal and local laws and regulations which seek to maintain health and safety standards by regulating the design and use of drilling methods and equipment.  Various permits from government bodies are required for drilling operations to be conducted; no assurance can be given that such permits will be received.  Environmental standards imposed by federal, provincial, or local authorities may be changed and any such changes may have material adverse effects on our activities.  Moreover, compliance with such laws may cause substantial delays or require capital outlays in excess of those anticipated, thus causing an adverse effect on us.

Exploration and production activities are subject to certain environmental regulations which may prevent or delay the commencement of our operations.

In general, our exploration and production activities are subject to certain federal and local laws and regulations relating to environmental quality and pollution control.  Such laws and regulations increase the costs of these activities and may prevent or delay the commencement or continuance of a given operation.  Compliance with these laws and regulations did not had a material effect on our operations or financial condition to date.  Legislation has been enacted which requires well and facility sites to be abandoned and reclaimed to the satisfaction of state authorities.  However, such laws and regulations are frequently changed and we are unable to predict the ultimate cost of compliance.  Generally, environmental requirements have not appeared to affect us any differently or to any greater or lesser extent than other companies in the industry.

We believe that our operations complied, in all material respects, with all applicable environmental regulations.

Our operating partners maintained insurance coverage customary to the industry; however, it is not fully insured against all environmental risks.

Exploratory drilling involves many risks and we may become liable for pollution or other liabilities which may have an adverse effect on our financial position.

Drilling operations generally involve a high degree of risk.  Hazards such as unusual or unexpected geological formations, power outages, labour disruptions, blow-outs, sour gas leakage, fire, inability to obtain suitable or adequate machinery, equipment or labour, and other risks are involved. We may become subject to liability for pollution or hazards against which it cannot adequately insure or which it may elect not to insure.  Incurring any such liability may have a material adverse effect on our financial position and operations.

Any change to government regulation/administrative practices may have a negative impact on our ability to operate and our profitability.

The laws, regulations, policies or current administrative practices of any governmental body, organization or regulatory agency in the United States or any other jurisdiction, may be changed, applied or interpreted in a manner which will fundamentally alter the ability of our company to carry on our business.

The actions, policies or regulations, or changes thereto, of any government body or regulatory agency, or other special interest groups, may have a detrimental effect on our company.  Any or all of these situations may have a negative impact on our ability to operate and/or become profitable.  

ITEM 2.  UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None

ITEM 3.  DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4.  (REMOVED AND RESERVED)

None

ITEM 5.  OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS

PART II

Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K

Exhibit Number and Description

(3)

Articles of Incorporation/Bylaws

3.1

Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference from our Registration Statement on Form 10-SB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2000)

3.2

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference from our Registration Statement on Form 10-SB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2000)

3.3

Bylaws (incorporated by reference from our Registration Statement on Form 10-SB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2000)

3.4

Certificate of Merger (Delaware) effective June 12, 2003 (incorporated by reference from our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2003)

3.5

Certificate of Merger (Wyoming) effective June 13, 2003 (incorporated by reference from our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2003)

(10)

Material Contracts

10.1

1999 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from our Registration Statement on Form 10-SB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2000)

10.2

Farm-in Agreement with Olympia Energy Inc., dated November 21, 2001 (incorporated by reference from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2002).

10.3

Agreement with Netco Energy Inc. dated January 10, 2005 (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 28, 2005).

10.4

Demand Promissory Note issued to Caravel Management Inc., dated March 31, 2006 (incorporated by reference from our Annual Report on Form 10K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2010).

10.5

Petroleum, Natural Gas and Related Rights Conveyance dated September 18, 2008 between Nation Energy Inc., Netco Energy Inc. and EnCana Oil & Gas Partnership (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 24, 2008).

10.6

Termination Agreement dated September 26, 2008 between Nation Energy Inc., and EnCana Oil & Gas Partnership (incorporated by reference from our Annual Report on Form 10K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2010).

10.7

Management Services Agreement dated January 1, 2009 between Nation Energy Inc., and Caravel Management Corp. (incorporated by reference from our Annual Report on Form 10K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2010).

(14)

Code of Ethics

14.1

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (incorporated by reference from our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 15, 2004).

(31)

Section 302 Certifications

31.1*

Section 302 Certification under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(32)

Section 906 Certifications

32.1*

Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

*Filed herewith

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

NATION ENERGY INC.


By:     “John Hislop”
John Hislop, President, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Director
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer)

Date:    August 18, 2010