Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - FIRST UNITED ETHANOL LLC | c05019exv31w2.htm |
EX-10.2 - EXHIBIT 10.2 - FIRST UNITED ETHANOL LLC | c05019exv10w2.htm |
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - FIRST UNITED ETHANOL LLC | c05019exv32w2.htm |
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - FIRST UNITED ETHANOL LLC | c05019exv32w1.htm |
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - FIRST UNITED ETHANOL LLC | c05019exv31w1.htm |
EX-10.1 - EXHIBIT 10.1 - FIRST UNITED ETHANOL LLC | c05019exv10w1.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
o | Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-53039
FIRST UNITED ETHANOL, LLC
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Georgia | 20-2497196 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
4433 Lewis B. Collins Road, Pelham, Georgia | 31779 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(229) 522-2822
(Registrants telephone number)
(Registrants telephone number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. o Yes þ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company þ | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date: As of August 13, 2010 there were 81,984 membership units outstanding.
INDEX
Page | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
15 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
Exhibit 10.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 10.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.2 |
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
FIRST UNITED ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, 2010 | September 30, 2009 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1,734,708 | $ | | ||||
Trade and other accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of approximately $46,000 and $53,500, respectively |
3,322,207 | 4,080,745 | ||||||
Due from broker |
457 | 109,700 | ||||||
Inventory |
7,500,716 | 7,619,273 | ||||||
Other assets |
1,078,582 | 75,714 | ||||||
Total current assets |
13,636,670 | 11,885,432 | ||||||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT |
||||||||
Office building, furniture and equipment |
1,091,395 | 1,080,985 | ||||||
Land and improvements |
2,508,148 | 2,508,148 | ||||||
Plant buildings and equipment |
161,421,785 | 161,289,145 | ||||||
165,021,328 | 164,878,278 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(15,391,607 | ) | (8,840,707 | ) | ||||
149,629,721 | 156,037,571 | |||||||
RESTRICTED CASH AND CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT |
2,779,634 | 4,269,662 | ||||||
FINANCING COSTS, net of amortization of $2,727,379 and $1,876,558 |
3,890,756 | 4,483,577 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 169,936,781 | $ | 176,676,242 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS EQUITY |
||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Excess of outstanding checks over bank balance |
$ | | $ | 81,555 | ||||
Revolving line of credit |
13,784,129 | 13,784,129 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
6,469,366 | 9,204,578 | ||||||
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
1,038,445 | 1,019,029 | ||||||
Current portion of interest rate swap liability |
572,016 | 817,718 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
6,544,103 | 9,243,647 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
547,000 | 615,625 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
1,400,000 | | ||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
| 61,325 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
30,355,059 | 34,827,606 | ||||||
INTEREST RATE SWAP LIABILITY |
286,008 | 954,004 | ||||||
CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS |
2,772,663 | 3,073,996 | ||||||
LONG-TERM DEBT |
100,711,201 | 103,325,017 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
134,124,931 | 142,180,623 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
||||||||
MEMBERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Membership contributions, 81,984 units issued and outstanding |
77,373,609 | 77,226,361 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(41,561,759 | ) | (42,730,742 | ) | ||||
Total members equity |
35,811,850 | 34,495,619 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS EQUITY |
$ | 169,936,781 | $ | 176,676,242 | ||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
FIRST UNITED ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three months | Three months | Nine months | Nine months | |||||||||||||
ending June 30, | ending June 30, | ended June 30, | ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 43,553,273 | $ | 44,061,519 | $ | 152,005,191 | $ | 120,224,231 | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
44,968,975 | 46,262,851 | 142,269,909 | 131,037,251 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit (loss) |
(1,415,702 | ) | (2,201,332 | ) | 9,735,282 | (10,813,020 | ) | |||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
908,950 | 1,192,571 | 3,161,325 | 3,853,031 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(2,324,652 | ) | (3,393,903 | ) | 6,573,957 | (14,666,051 | ) | |||||||||
Other income (expense) |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swap |
321,643 | 356,194 | 913,698 | (1,304,647 | ) | |||||||||||
Gain (loss) on the sale of equipment |
(5,815 | ) | | (5,815 | ) | | ||||||||||
Interest expense |
(2,118,860 | ) | (2,954,655 | ) | (6,320,426 | ) | (7,986,018 | ) | ||||||||
Interest income |
3,141 | 4,197 | 7,569 | 7,982 | ||||||||||||
(1,799,891 | ) | (2,594,264 | ) | (5,404,974 | ) | (9,282,683 | ) | |||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (4,124,543 | ) | $ | (5,988,167 | ) | $ | 1,168,983 | $ | (23,948,734 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) per unit (Basic and Diluted) |
$ | (50.31 | ) | $ | (75.38 | ) | $ | 14.26 | $ | (308.80 | ) | |||||
Weighted average units outstanding |
81,984 | 79,445 | 81,984 | 77,555 | ||||||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
FIRST UNITED ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Nine months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,168,983 | $ | (23,948,734 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation |
6,550,900 | 6,050,252 | ||||||
Amortization |
850,821 | 749,607 | ||||||
Non-cash compensation expense |
147,248 | 82,758 | ||||||
Loss on sale of equipment |
5,815 | | ||||||
Unrealized (gains) losses on interest rate swap |
(913,698 | ) | 1,304,647 | |||||
Recovery of doubtful receivables |
(7,500 | ) | | |||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Trade and other accounts receivable |
766,038 | (4,044,881 | ) | |||||
Due from broker |
109,243 | (10,105 | ) | |||||
Inventory |
118,557 | (754,716 | ) | |||||
Other assets |
(1,002,868 | ) | 1,083,221 | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(2,699,544 | ) | (387,401 | ) | ||||
Accrued interest payable |
670,125 | (342,818 | ) | |||||
Deferred revenue |
1,400,000 | | ||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
(61,325 | ) | | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
7,102,795 | (20,218,170 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Purchase of certificates of deposit |
(50,000 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds received from sale of equipment |
755 | | ||||||
Purchase of property and equipment, net of returns |
(149,620 | ) | (3,469,014 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used in) investing activities |
(198,865 | ) | (3,469,014 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable |
| 18,988,632 | ||||||
Payment of financing costs |
(258,000 | ) | | |||||
Repayment of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
(5,030,945 | ) | (66,885 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from revolving line of credit |
| 2,384,129 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of units |
| 2,037,550 | ||||||
Release (funding) of restricted cash balance |
201,278 | (352,969 | ) | |||||
Excess of outstanding checks over bank balance |
(81,555 | ) | | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(5,169,222 | ) | 22,990,457 | |||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
1,734,708 | (696,727 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
| 7,685,978 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 1,734,708 | $ | 6,989,251 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 5,538,230 | $ | 8,329,229 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities |
||||||||
Repayment of notes and interest payable paid by Bond Trustee |
$ | 1,338,750 | $ | 900,000 | ||||
Assets acquired under capital lease or financing arrangement |
| 4,612,472 | ||||||
Accrued expenses reclassed to subordinated debt |
| 3,977,544 | ||||||
Deferred revenue applied to property & equipment |
| 50,000 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
FIRST UNITED ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Business
First United Ethanol, LLC and subsidiary (the Company) is located near Camilla, Georgia. The
Company operates a 100 million gallon ethanol plant with distribution within the United States. The
Company formally began ethanol operations in October 2008.
The Company was formally organized as a limited liability company on March 9, 2005 under the name
Mitchell County Research Group, LLC. In September 2005, the Company formally changed its name to
First United Ethanol, LLC. In November 2007, the Companys wholly owned subsidiary, Southwest
Georgia Ethanol, LLC (SWGE) was formed in conjunction with the debt financing agreement with West
LB. First United Ethanol, LLC transferred the majority of its assets and liabilities to Southwest
Georgia Ethanol, LLC.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying financial information of the Company is unaudited; however, such information
reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of
management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations.
The results of operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. These statements should be read
in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its 100% owned
subsidiary. All material inter-company accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosures of
contingent assets and liabilities and other items, as well as the reported revenues and expenses.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash and Certificates of Deposit
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or
less to be cash equivalents. The Companys cash balances are maintained in bank depositories and
periodically exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced losses in these
accounts. The Company segregates cash held in escrow, cash restricted and certificates of deposit
restricted for use by debt agreements as non-current.
Trade Accounts Receivable
Trade accounts receivable are recorded at original invoice amounts less an estimate made for
doubtful receivables based on a review of all outstanding amounts on a monthly basis. Management
determines the allowance for doubtful accounts by regularly evaluating individual customer
receivables and considering customers financial condition, credit history and current economic
conditions. Receivables are written off when deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of receivables
written off are recorded when received
6
Table of Contents
FIRST UNITED ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Inventories
Ethanol and related products, raw materials and work-in-process are valued using methods which
approximate the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. In the valuation of inventories and
purchase and sale commitments, market is based on current replacement values except that it does
not exceed net realizable values and is not less than net realizable values reduced by allowances
for approximate normal profit margin.
Financing Costs
Financing costs associated with the construction and revolving loans discussed in Note 5 and are
recorded at cost and include expenditures directly related to securing debt financing. The Company
is amortizing these costs using the effective interest method over the term of the agreement. The
financing costs are included in interest expense in the statement of operations.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method
over the following estimated useful lives:
Buildings |
20 Years | |||
Plant and Process Equipment |
5-20 Years | |||
Office Furniture and Equipment |
3-10 Years |
Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred; major improvements and betterments are
capitalized. The present value of capital lease obligations are classified as long-term debt and
the related assets are included in property and equipment. Amortization of assets under capital
lease is included in depreciation expense.
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be
recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows from operations are less than the carrying
value of the asset group. An impairment loss would be measured by the amount by which the carrying
value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. In accordance with Company policies,
management has evaluated the plant for possible impairment based on projected future cash flows
from operations. Management has determined that its projected future cash flows from operations
exceed the carrying value of the plant and that no impairment exists at June 30, 2010.
Investment in Commodities Contracts, Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company is exposed to certain risks related to its ongoing business operations. The primary
risks that the Company manages by using forward or derivative instruments are price risk on
anticipated purchases of corn and natural gas.
The Company is subject to market risk with respect to the price and availability of corn, the
principal raw material we use to produce ethanol and ethanol by-products. In general, rising corn
prices result in lower profit margins and, therefore, represent unfavorable market conditions. This
is especially true when market conditions do not allow the Company to pass along increased corn
costs to our customers. The availability and price of corn is subject to wide fluctuations due to
unpredictable factors such as weather conditions, farmer planting decisions, governmental policies
with respect to agriculture and international trade and global demand and supply.
Certain contracts that literally meet the definition of a derivative may be exempted from
derivative accounting as normal purchases or normal sales. Normal purchases and normal sales are
contracts that provide for the purchase or sale of something other than a financial instrument or
derivative instrument that will be delivered in quantities expected to be used or sold over a
reasonable period in the normal course of business. Contracts that meet the requirements of normal
purchases or sales are documented as such and exempted from the accounting and reporting
requirements of derivative accounting.
7
Table of Contents
FIRST UNITED ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Company enters into firm-price purchase commitments every month with its natural gas suppliers
under which they agree to buy natural gas at a price set in advance of the actual delivery of that
natural gas to us. Under these arrangements, the Company assumes the risk of a price decrease in
the market price of natural gas between the time this price is fixed and the time the natural gas
is delivered. The Company accounts for these transactions as normal purchases, and accordingly,
does not mark these transactions to market nor does the Company record the commitment on the
balance sheet.
From time to time, the Company enters into short-term cash, options and futures contracts as a
means of securing corn for the ethanol plant and managing exposure to changes in commodity prices.
The Company maintains a risk management strategy that uses derivative instruments to minimize
significant, unanticipated earnings fluctuations caused by market fluctuations. The Companys
specific goal is to protect the Company from large moves in commodity costs. All derivatives will
be designated as non-hedge derivatives for accounting purposes and the contracts will be accounted
for at fair value. Although the contracts will be effective economic hedges of specified risks,
they are not designated as and accounted for as hedging instruments.
As part of its trading activity, the Company uses futures and option contracts offered through
regulated commodity exchanges to reduce risk and is exposed to risk of loss in the market value of
inventories. To reduce that risk, the Company generally takes positions using cash and futures
contracts and options.
To ensure an adequate supply of corn to operate the plant, the Company enters into contracts to
purchase corn from local farmers and its major suppliers. At June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009,
the Company had corn contracts totaling approximately $4,838,000 and $300,000, respectively, based
upon the average per bushel price.
The Company has also managed a portion of its floating interest rate exposure through the use of
interest rate derivative contracts. The Companys forward LIBOR-based contract reduces risk from
interest rate movements as gains and losses on the contract offset portions of the interest rate
variability of our variable-rate debt. The notional amount of the swap at June 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009 was $30,847,228 and $47,508,877, respectively. The effect of the swap is to
limit the interest rate exposure on the LIBOR component to a fixed rate of 4.04% compared to a
variable interest rate. The swaps notional amount will decrease quarterly to $0 by the termination
date of December 31, 2011. The counterparty to the contracts is a large commercial bank, and the
Company does not anticipate their nonperformance. The swap is designated as a non-hedge derivative
and is marked to market. The estimated fair value of this agreement at June 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009, was a liability of approximately $858,000 and $1,772,000.
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments at June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 were as
follows:
Balance Sheet Classification | June 30, 2010 | September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||
Futures and options contracts |
(Current Liabilities) | $ | | $ | (61,325 | ) | ||||||
Interest rate swap |
(Current Liabilities) | 572,016 | 817,718 | |||||||||
Interest rate swap |
(Non-Current Liabilities) | 286,008 | 954,004 |
Nine | Nine | Three | Three | |||||||||||||||||
Statement of | months | months | months | months | ||||||||||||||||
Operations | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
Classification | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses)
on future and option commodity contracts |
Revenues | $ | (13,780 | ) | $ | | $ | 38,492 | $ | | ||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gains on futures and option commodity
contracts |
Cost of Goods Sold | 51,203 | 1,329,000 | 12,507 | 49,000 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) related to the interest
rate swap |
Other non-operating (expense) | 913,698 | (1,304,647 | ) | 321,643 | (356,194 | ) |
8
Table of Contents
FIRST UNITED ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers
revenue realized or realizable and earned when it has persuasive evidence of an arrangement,
delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably
assured.
Revenue from the production of ethanol and related products is recorded at the time title and all
risks of ownership transfer to customers, which is typically upon loading and shipping of the
product shipment from the facility. Commissions are included in cost of goods sold. In addition,
shipping and handling costs incurred by the Company for the sale of ethanol and related products
are included in cost of goods sold.
Deferred revenue is recorded when cash has been received, but the revenue recognition process is
not complete. The revenue will be recorded when persuasive evidence exists.
Interest income is recognized as earned.
Net Income (Loss) per Membership Unit
For purposes of calculating basic and diluted net income (loss) per member unit, units subscribed
and issued by the Company are considered outstanding on the effective date of issue and are
weighted by days outstanding.
Income taxes
The Company is organized as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes and generally
does not incur income taxes. Instead, the Companys earnings and losses are included in the income
tax returns of the members. Therefore, no provision or liability for federal or state income taxes
has been included in these financial statements.
Management has evaluated their material tax positions and determined there is no income tax effect
with respect to the financial statements at December 31, 2009. The Company is no longer subject to
U.S. federal or state income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before December 31,
2005. The Company has not been notified of any impending examinations by tax authorities, and no
examinations are in process.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, derivative instruments, trade and other
receivables, accounts payable, accrued expenses, notes payable and long-term debt. Management
believes the fair value of each of these financial instruments approximates their carrying value on
the balance sheet as of the balance sheet date. The fair value of current financial instruments is
estimated to approximate carrying value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The fair
value of derivative financial instruments is based on quoted market prices. The fair value of the
long-term debt is estimated based on anticipated interest rates which management believes would
currently be available to the Company for similar issues of debt, taking into account the current
credit risk of the Company and the other market factors.
Reclassification
Certain items in the consolidated statements of operations and balance sheet have been changed to
conform to classification adopted for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 with no effect on net
income or members equity.
9
Table of Contents
FIRST UNITED ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
NOTE 2. INVENTORIES
A summary of inventories at June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 is as follows:
June 30, 2010 | September 30, 2009 | |||||||
Corn |
$ | 3,614,844 | $ | 3,958,543 | ||||
Denaturant and chemical supplies |
427,229 | 287,640 | ||||||
Work in process |
1,269,000 | 1,095,000 | ||||||
Ethanol |
1,298,704 | 1,649,895 | ||||||
Distiller grains |
890,939 | 628,195 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 7,500,716 | $ | 7,619,273 | ||||
NOTE 3. RELATED PARTIES AND SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
An entity which has common ownership with Fagen, Inc., the Companys principal vendor in the
construction of the ethanol facility, is also a Member of the Company and holds approximately 1.2%
of the outstanding units. In addition, the Company has a subordinated promissory note due Fagen,
Inc. in the amount of $3,977,545 as of June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009.
The Company purchased corn at market prices in the amount of $282,957 and $0 for the three months
and $1,786,351 and $946,007 for the nine months ending June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, from
certain directors in the normal course of business.
During the 3rd quarter 2010, the Company entered into a contract with a director for delivery of
approximately 12,000 tons of distiller grains for delivery throughout the remainder of 2010. As of
June 30, 2010 the member had prepaid $1,400,000 for the related distiller grains which is being
shown as deferred revenue. Subsequent to June 30, 2010, the Company and director both agreed to
cancel the contract, as such, the prepayment will be remitted back to the director in the next
quarter.
NOTE 4. LEASES
The Company leases operating machinery under a lease agreement with De Lage Landen which is
accounted for as a capital lease. The lease will expire in 2013. The assets have a capitalized cost
of $157,664 included in property and equipment as of June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009.
Accumulated depreciation totaled $27,589 and $15,766 as of June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009,
respectively.
The Company entered into an Excess Facilities Charge Agreement with Georgia Power Company in which
Georgia Power installed a power substation to augment the Companys power system. The cost of the
substation is charged to the Company over a three year period requiring annual payments of
principal and interest totaling $686,309 beginning June 30, 2009. The Company has accounted for
this agreement as a capital lease. The present value of future payments due under the lease of
$1,834,512 is included in property and equipment as of June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009.
Accumulated depreciation totaled $160,517 and $91,726 as of June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009,
respectively.
The Company also entered into a Natural Gas Facilities Agreement with the City of Camilla for a
high pressure gas main to serve the plant and purchase natural gas from the City of Camilla. The
City of Camilla owns and operates the gas main and leases its usage to the Company. The agreement
calls for a monthly facilities charge, in addition to the normal consumption charges, equal to the
cost of the installation of the gas main over an 80 month period beginning June 2009 and requiring
principal and interest payments of approximately $43,000 each month. The Company has accounted for
the facilities lease charges as a capital lease. The asset present value of future payments
under the lease of $2,777,960 is included in property and equipment as of June 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009. Accumulated depreciation totaled $254,645 and $138,898 as of June 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009.
10
Table of Contents
FIRST UNITED ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
A summary of capital leases as of June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 is as follows:
June 30, 2010 | September 30, 2009 | |||||||
De Lage Landen Financial Services, 60 months, interest rate of 7.5% |
$ | 104,374 | $ | 126,327 | ||||
Georgia Power Substation lease, 36 months, interest rate of 5.85% |
1,299,364 | 1,299,364 | ||||||
Natural Gas Facilities lease, 80 months, interest rate of 6.59% |
2,407,370 | 2,667,334 | ||||||
3,811,108 | 4,093,025 | |||||||
Less current portion |
(1,038,445 | ) | (1,019,029 | ) | ||||
$ | 2,772,663 | $ | 3,073,996 | |||||
The Company also entered into operating leases with Trinity Industries Leasing Company for the use
of tanker cars. The tanker car leases expire November 2017. During the year ended September 30,
2009, the Company determined that a portion of the tanker cars under the non-cancelable leases will
not be utilized and have no future benefit. Accordingly, the Company recorded a liability and a
charge to income in the amount $745,000 for the future lease payments associated with the unused
tanker cars. The remaining accrual as of June 30, 2010 is approximately $260,750. In February and
March of 2010, the Company signed sublease agreements for a portion of the cars through
December 2010 and March 2012 and recorded sublease income for the three and nine months ended June
30, 2010 of approximately $151,000 and $294,000.
NOTE 5. DEBT FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
The Companys long-term debt outstanding as of June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 is summarized
as follows:
June 30, 2010 | September 30, 2009 | |||||||
West LB Term Loan, variable interest rates from 4.00% to 7.81%,
described below: |
$ | 93,800,000 | $ | 98,500,000 | ||||
Subordinated Fagen note, 4% through June 30, 2010 and 8% thereafter |
3,977,545 | 3,977,545 | ||||||
Subordinated debt facility, interest rate of 7.5%, described below |
9,250,000 | 9,850,000 | ||||||
Notes payable John Deere Credit, interest rate of 5.3%, described below |
153,022 | 202,050 | ||||||
107,180,567 | 112,529,595 | |||||||
Less current portion |
(6,469,366 | ) | (9,204,578 | ) | ||||
$ | 100,711,201 | $ | 103,325,017 | |||||
West LB Credit Arrangement Senior Debt
SWGE entered into a senior credit agreement that provided for (1) a construction loan facility in
an aggregate amount of up to $100,000,000, which converted to a term loan on February 20, 2009
(Conversion Date), (2) a term loan facility in an aggregate amount of up to $100,000,000 which
matures on February 20, 2015 (the Final Maturity Date); and (3) a working capital loan in an
aggregate amount of up to $15,000,000 which matures February 20, 2011. The primary purpose of the
credit facility was to finance the construction and operation of the Companys ethanol plant.
11
Table of Contents
FIRST UNITED ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
As of June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, the Company had drawn $13,784,129 on the $15,000,000
working capital loan.
On June 7, 2010 the Company amended its Senior Credit Agreement and its Accounts Agreement with
WestLB. Pursuant to the amended agreements, the Company is required to maintain a certain level of
working capital. Pursuant to the amended loan agreements the Company was required to have a working
capital deficit of $12,000,000 or less as of June 30, 2010. The Company met that requirement by
having a working capital deficit of approximately $11,100,000 at June 30, 2010. The required
working capital threshold tightens for the quarters ending September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2010. The Company is required to have a working capital deficit of $9,000,000 or less as of
September 30, 2010 and $7,000,000 or less as of December 31, 2010. Subsequent to December 31,
2010, the working capital deficit requirement will remain at $7,000,000 for the term of the loan.
In the event the Company is unable to meet the level of working capital required under the amended
loan agreements the Company will be assessed a five percent (5%) fee on the outstanding loans for
any quarter for which it is not in compliance. This fee payment is in addition to the interest the
Company is required to pay on its outstanding debt pursuant to the original loan agreements. This
additional interest fee will be accrued and due February 2015, the final maturity date for the
Companys outstanding loans with West LB. Furthermore, and regardless of whether the Company has
maintained the required level or working capital, the Company will be required to make an
additional quarterly principal payment of $150,000 toward its outstanding working capital loan
balance. This arrangement is distinct from the borrowing base formula and borrowing base
certificates previously utilized to monitor compliance with the Companys working capital loans.
This amendment also removes the borrowing base default triggers from the terms of the loan, thereby
removing the requirement for waivers.
Prior to signing the amended loan agreements the Company was required to repay the amount that its
working capital loan outstanding exceeded its borrowing base. The Companys borrowing base was 80%
of the value of certain accounts receivable and certain inventory owned by FUEL and was calculated
on a monthly basis. The Company was required to deliver to its lender a borrowing base certificate
setting forth the data necessary to make the borrowing base calculations. As of April 15, 2010 the
Companys working capital loans exceeded its borrowing base by $5,280,368 and the Company was not
able to repay that amount to WestLB. Accordingly, the Company requested and obtained a waiver of
the loan agreement covenants requiring it to repay the difference between its working capital loan
outstanding and its borrowing base. This waiver was part of the amended loan agreements dated
June 7, 2010.
Subordinated Debt Facility
The Company has a subordinated debt financing arrangement pursuant to which the Mitchell County
Development Authority issued $10,000,000 of revenue bonds that were placed with Wachovia Bank. The
Company signed a promissory note, which is collateralized by the Companys assets and the proceeds
were placed in a Bond Trustee account with Regions Bank. The interest rate for this note is 7.5%.
The Company is required to maintain a debt service reserve with the Bond Trustee of at least
$1,180,000. This note is subordinated to the West LB debt agreement, which currently prohibits the
Company from making any debt service payments. As a result, the Bond Trustee made the annual
interest and principal payment to the bond holders of approximately $1,339,000 in December 2009
from the debt service reserve. The funds held in the Bond Trustee account are classified as
non-current restricted cash and cash equivalents in the Companys consolidated balance sheet. The
subordinated debt is a 15 year note (maturity in December 2011) with annual principal payments each
December due to the bond holders in 2010 of $635,000, in 2011 of $530,000, in 2012 of $570,000, in
2013 of $615,000, in 2014 of $660,000 and $6,240,000 thereafter. The $635,000 due in 2010 has been
classified as long-term as any payment will come from the debt service fund due to the
subordination.
Subordinated Fagen Note
On June 30, 2009, SWGE entered into a subordinated promissory note agreement in the amount of
$3,977,545 due Fagen, Inc., a related party, for the remaining design-build contract balance. The
note bears interest at 4% through June 30, 2010 and 8% thereafter through maturity on June 30,
2011. Interest is payable quarterly. The first principal payment of $500,000 was due as of
September 30, 2009 and annual principal payments of $1,738,772 are due June 30, 2010 and June 30,
2011. However, this note is subordinated to the West LB debt agreement, which
currently prohibits the Company from making these principal payments on the schedule described
above, based on the amortization of the West LB debt, the earliest any payment can be made is in
2014, and as such the $3,977,545 is being classified as long-term.
12
Table of Contents
FIRST UNITED ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Other Notes Payable
The Company financed the acquisition of certain equipment through two identical notes payable to
John Deere Credit. The notes amortize over four years (maturity in August 2012) with monthly
principal and interest payments and are secured by the equipment. The interest rate is 5.3%. The
combined outstanding balance on these two notes payable is $153,022 and $202,050 as of June 30,
2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively.
NOTE 6. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Companys balance sheet contains derivative financial instruments and marketable securities
that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company adopted the fair value
measurements and disclosures standard, which defines a single definition of fair value, together
with a framework for measuring it, and requires additional disclosure about the use of fair value
to measure assets and liabilities.
The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used in valuation techniques into three levels as
follows:
| Level 1 Observable inputs unadjusted quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets and liabilities; |
||
| Level 2 Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1
that are observable for the asset or liability through corroboration
with market data; and |
||
| Level 3 Unobservable inputs includes amounts derived from valuation
models where one or more significant inputs are unobservable. |
The Company has classified its investments in marketable securities and derivative instruments into
these levels depending on the inputs used to determine their fair values. The Companys investments
in marketable securities consist of money market funds restricted by the bond holders which are
based on quoted prices and are designated as Level 1. The Companys derivative instruments consist of commodity positions and an interest rate
swap. The fair value of the commodity positions are based on quoted prices on the commodity
exchanges and are designated as Level 1 and the fair value of the interest rate swap is based on
quoted prices on similar assets or liabilities in active markets and discounts to reflect potential
credit risk to lenders and are designated as Level 2.
The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at June 30, 2010 (in thousands):
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Derivative instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap |
$ | | $ | 858 | $ | | $ | 858 | ||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | | $ | 858 | $ | | $ | 858 | ||||||||
13
Table of Contents
FIRST UNITED ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at September 30, 2009 (in
thousands):
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Investments in
marketable securities,
included in restricted
cash |
$ | 1,597 | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,597 | ||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,597 | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,597 | ||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Derivative instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Commodity positions |
$ | 61 | $ | | $ | | $ | 61 | ||||||||
Interest rate swap |
| 1,772 | | 1,772 | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 61 | $ | 1,772 | $ | | $ | 1,833 | ||||||||
Certain financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring
basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject
to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of
impairment). Financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring
basis were not significant at June 30, 2010.
NOTE 7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Liquidity
Our liquidity, results of operations and financial performance will be impacted by many variables,
including the market price for commodities such as, but not limited to, corn, ethanol and other
energy commodities, as well as the market price for any co-products generated by the facility and
the cost of labor and other operating costs. Assuming future relative price levels for corn,
ethanol and distillers grains remain consistent with the relative price levels as of June 30, 2010,
the Company expects operations to generate adequate cash flows to maintain operations. This
assumption requires the Company to be able to sell all the ethanol that is produced at the plant.
The Company expects to be able to satisfy our cash requirements for the next 12 months using only
the revolving line of credit, senior credit facility, and earnings from operations.
14
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
We prepared the following discussion and analysis to help you better understand our financial
condition, changes in our financial condition, and results of operations for the three and nine
month periods ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. This
discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the
Managements Discussion and Analysis section for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, included
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements that involve future events, our future
performance and our future operations and actions. In some cases you can identify forward-looking
statements by the use of words such as may, should, anticipate, believe, expect, plan,
future, intend, could, estimate, predict, hope, potential, continue, or the
negative of these terms or other similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are only
our predictions and involve numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Our actual results or
actions may differ materially from these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the
following factors:
| Changes in our business strategy, capital improvements or development plans; |
| Volatility of corn, natural gas, ethanol, unleaded gasoline, distillers grains and
other commodities prices; |
| Limitations and restrictions contained in the instruments and agreements governing
our indebtedness; |
| Our ability to generate sufficient liquidity to fund our debt service requirements
and capital expenditures; |
| Our ability to comply with our loan covenants and to obtain waivers from our lender
for any non-compliance with those covenants; |
| Our ability to secure the financing we require to maintain liquidity and operate our
business; |
| The results of our hedging transactions and other risk management strategies; |
| Our inelastic demand for corn, as it is the only available feedstock for our plant; |
| Changes in the environmental regulations or in our ability to comply with the
environmental regulations that apply to our plant site and our operations; |
| The effects of mergers or consolidations in the ethanol industry; |
| Changes in general economic conditions or the occurrence of certain events causing
an economic impact in the agriculture, oil or automobile industries; |
| Changes in the availability of credit to support the level of liquidity necessary to
implement our risk management activities; |
| Changes in or elimination of federal and/or state laws (including the elimination of
any federal and/or state ethanol tax incentives); |
| Overcapacity within the ethanol industry; |
| Changes and advances in ethanol production technology that may make it more
difficult for us to compete with other ethanol plants utilizing such technology; |
| Our reliance on key management personnel; |
| The development of infrastructure related to the sale and distribution of ethanol;
and |
| Competition in the ethanol industry and from other alternative fuel additives. |
Our actual results or actions could and likely will differ materially from those anticipated
in the forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the reasons described in this report.
We are not under any duty to update the forward-looking statements contained in this report. We
cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We caution you
not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of
this report. You should read this report and the documents that we reference in this report and
have filed as exhibits completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be
materially different from what we currently expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking
statements by these cautionary statements.
15
Table of Contents
Available Information
Information about us is also available at our website at http://www.firstunitedethanol.com,
under SEC Compliance, which includes links to reports we have filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The contents of our website are not incorporated by reference in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Overview
First United Ethanol, LLC (we, us, FUEL, First United, or the Company) was formed as
a Georgia limited liability company on March 9, 2005, for the purpose of raising capital to
develop, construct, own and operate a 100 million gallon per year ethanol plant near Camilla,
Georgia. We completed construction of our ethanol plant in October 2008 and plant operations
commenced on October 10, 2008. We are currently in our second year of plant operations. In our
first year of plant operations we processed approximately 29 million bushels of corn producing 81
million gallons of denatured fuel grade ethanol, 214,000 tons of dried distillers grains and 7,000
tons of wet distillers grains.
Our revenues are derived from the sale and distribution of our ethanol and distillers grains
primarily in the southeastern United States. Our ethanol plant currently operates at or near its
nameplate capacity. A significant percentage of our corn is supplied to us by train and is
originated primarily from the eastern Corn Belt; however, we are able to originate an increasing
percentage of our corn from local producers. Currently, approximately 93% of our ethanol is being
shipped out of our facility by truck to local and regional blending terminals. Additionally, as of
the date of this report, approximately 98.5% of our dried distillers grains are being shipped out
of our facility by truck to local livestock and poultry operations.
There have been a number of recent developments in legislation that impacts the ethanol
industry. One such development concerns the federal Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS). The ethanol
industry is benefited by the RFS which requires that a certain amount of renewable fuels must be
used in the United States each year. In February 2010, the EPA issued new regulations governing
the RFS. These new regulations have been called RFS2. RFS2 as adopted by the EPA provides that
corn-based ethanol from modern ethanol production processes does meet the definition of a renewable
fuel under the RFS program.
In addition to RFS2 which included greenhouse gas reduction requirements, in 2009, California
passed a Low Carbon Fuels Standard (LCFS). The California LCFS requires that renewable fuels used
in California must accomplish certain reductions in greenhouse gases which is measured using a
lifecycle analysis, similar to RFS2. Management believes that this lifecycle analysis is based on
unsound scientific principles that unfairly disadvantages corn based ethanol. If our industry is
unable to supply ethanol to California, it could significantly reduce demand for the ethanol we
produce. Several lawsuits have been filed by industry groups challenging the California LCFS.
Ethanol production in the United States is benefited by various tax incentives. The most
significant of these tax incentives is the federal Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit (VEETC).
VEETC provides a volumetric ethanol excise tax credit of 45 cents per gallon of ethanol blended
with gasoline. VEETC is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2010. If this tax credit is not
renewed, it likely would have a negative impact on the price of ethanol and demand for ethanol in
the marketplace. The current debate in the U.S. Congress, about deficit spending and energy policy
indicates that it is possible that VEETC may not be renewed. If the VEETC that benefits the
ethanol industry is allowed to expire, it could negatively impact demand for ethanol and may harm
our financial condition.
16
Table of Contents
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
The following table shows the result of our operations and the percentage of revenues, cost of
goods sold, operating expenses and other items to total revenues in our statement of operations for
the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Statement of Operations Data | Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 43,553,273 | 100.0 | % | $ | 44,061,519 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of Goods Sold |
44,968,975 | 103.3 | % | 46,262,851 | 105.0 | % | ||||||||||
Gross (Loss) |
(1,415,702 | ) | (3.3 | )% | (2,201,332 | ) | (5.0 | )% | ||||||||
General and Administrative Expenses |
908,950 | 2.1 | % | 1,192,571 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||
Operating (Loss) |
(2,324,652 | ) | (5.3 | )% | (3,393,903 | ) | (7.7 | )% | ||||||||
Other Expense |
(1,799,891 | ) | (4.1 | )% | (2,594,264 | ) | (5.9 | )% | ||||||||
Net (Loss) |
$ | (4,124,543 | ) | (9.5 | )% | $ | (5,988,167 | ) | (13.6 | )% |
Revenues
Our revenues from operations come from two primary sources: sales of fuel ethanol and sales of
distillers grains.
The following table shows the sources of our revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2010
and 2009.
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Revenue Source | Amount | % of Revenues | Amount | % of Revenues | ||||||||||||
Ethanol Sales |
$ | 36,244,939 | 83.22 | % | $ | 35,890,603 | 81.50 | % | ||||||||
Dried Distillers Grains
Sales |
7,029,032 | 16.14 | % | 8,058,250 | 18.30 | % | ||||||||||
Wet Distillers Grains Sales |
279,302 | 0.64 | % | 112,666 | 0.20 | % | ||||||||||
Total Revenues |
$ | 43,553,273 | 100.0 | % | $ | 44,061,519 | 100.0 | % |
Our ethanol revenue increased during the three month period ended June 30, 2010 compared to
the three month period ended June 30, 2009 as a result of increased ethanol sales. However, our
increased ethanol sales were mitigated by a lower per gallon sales price. Our ethanol sales
prices for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 decreased approximately 5.5% compared to the three month
period ended June 30, 2009. We sold approximately 21,750,000 gallons of ethanol during the three
month period ended June 30, 2010 compared to approximately 20,300,000 gallons of ethanol sold
during the three month period ended June 30, 2009.
Our distillers grain revenue decreased during the three month period ended June 30, 2010
compared to the same period in 2009. We sold approximately 54,000 tons of dried distillers grains
and approximately 8,000 tons of wet distillers grains during the three month period ended June 30,
2010. During the comparable period in 2009 we sold approximately 2,000 fewer tons of dried
distillers grains and approximately 6,000 more tons of wet distillers grains. Despite the overall
increase in distillers grains production and sales we experienced decrease in the sales price of
both our dried distillers grains and our wet distillers grains. For example, during the quarter
ended June 30, 2010, the market price of dried distillers grains decreased approximately 18.3%
compared to the three month period ended June 30, 2009.
We anticipate receiving higher ethanol prices during the remaining summer months due to a
recent increase in the demand for gasoline and ethanol. However, if the price of ethanol were to
decrease and remain low for an extended period of time it would have significant negative impact on
our liquidity, even if our raw material costs remain steady. We anticipate that the price of
distillers grains will continue to fluctuate in reaction to changes in the price of corn. The
ethanol industry needs to continue to expand the market for distillers grains in order to maintain
current price levels.
Cost of Goods Sold
Our cost of goods sold was approximately $44,969,000 or 103% of our revenues for the three
month period ended June 30, 2010, compared to approximately $46,263,000 or 105% of our revenues for
the three month period ended June 30, 2009. Our two primary costs of producing ethanol and
distillers grains are the cost of corn and
natural gas. Approximately 78% of our cost of goods sold is attributable to corn costs and
approximately 9% is attributable to natural gas costs.
17
Table of Contents
While we believe there is corn available nationally from a supply and demand standpoint, there
is uncertainty over the quantity and quality of local corn for the plant. The cost of corn is the
largest input cost to the plant and these uncertainties could dramatically affect our expected
input costs. During the three month period ended June 30, 2010, corn prices were relatively steady
but increased after the end of the quarter. We expect that corn prices will continue to be
volatile for the rest of our fiscal year, depending on weather conditions and other demand factors.
Our other costs of goods sold include denaturant, process chemicals, electricity,
transportation, and direct labor. Together these costs represent approximately 13% of our cost of
goods sold. We do not anticipate these costs to be as volatile as our corn and natural gas
expenses. However, our transportation, electrical and denaturant costs are directly tied to the
price of energy generally and, therefore, may fluctuate along with the price of petroleum based
energy products.
At June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, the Company had forward corn contracts totaling
approximately $4,838,000 and $300,000, respectively, based upon the average per bushel price.
General and Administrative Expenses
Our general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues were 2.1% for the three
month period ended June 30, 2010, and our general and administrative expenses as a percentage of
revenues were 2.7% for the three month period ended June 30, 2009. General and administrative
expenses consist primarily of payroll, employee benefits, and professional fees. Our general and
administrative expenses have been decreasing since beginning operations due to our ability to make
our internal operations more efficient.
Operating Income (Loss)
Our loss from operations for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was 3.3% of our revenues,
our loss for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was 7.7% of our revenues. We had an operating
loss for these periods because we had high input prices relative to our ethanol and distillers
grains revenues. This coincided with a soft demand cycle in the ethanol market thereby limiting
the volume of ethanol that could be sold at favorable price levels. Subsequent to our quarter
ended June 30, 2010, ethanol demand has increased with the summer driving season which has given us
the opportunity to sell available production at favorable price levels.
Other (Expense)
We had total other expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 of approximately $1,800,000
resulting primarily from our interest expense for the period. Interest expense for the period was
approximately $2,119,000 which was offset by an unrealized gain of approximately $322,000 for the
change in fair value of our interest rate swap.
18
Table of Contents
Additional Information
The following table shows additional information regarding production and price levels for our
primary inputs and products for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
Percentage of Increase (Decrease) for | ||||
comparison of Three Months Ended | ||||
June 30, 2010 to June 30, 2009 | ||||
Production: |
||||
Ethanol sold (gallons) |
6.94 | % | ||
Dried distillers grains sold (tons) |
(4.28 | )% | ||
Wet distillers grains sold (tons) |
278.19 | % | ||
Revenues: |
||||
Ethanol average price per gallon |
(5.55 | )% | ||
Dried distillers grains revenue per gallon of ethanol sold |
(18.39 | )% | ||
Wet distillers grains revenue per gallon of ethanol sold |
83.33 | % | ||
Total revenue per gallon of ethanol sold |
(7.29 | )% | ||
Costs: |
||||
Corn cost per gallon of ethanol sold (including freight) |
(13.71 | )% | ||
Overhead and other direct costs per gallon of ethanol sold |
(8.10 | )% | ||
Total cost per gallon of ethanol sold |
(12.52 | )% |
During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, our market price of ethanol decreased approximately
5.5% compared to the three month period ended June 30, 2009. If our average price received per
gallon of ethanol had been $0.10 lower, our gross margin for the quarter would have decreased by
approximately $2,178,650, assuming our other revenues and costs remained unchanged.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, the market price of dried distillers grains decreased
approximately 18.3% compared to the three month period ended June 30, 2009. If our average price
received per ton of dried distillers grains had been $1.00 lower, our gross margin for the quarter
would have decreased by approximately $53,752, assuming our other revenues and costs remained
unchanged.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, the market price of corn on a per gallon basis
decreased by approximately 13.7% compared to the three month period ended June 30, 2009. If our
average price paid per bushel of corn had been $0.25 higher, our gross margin for the quarter would
have decreased by approximately $1,847,455, assuming our other revenues and costs remained
unchanged.
Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
The following table shows the results of our operations and the approximate percentage of
revenues, costs of sales, operating expenses and other items to total revenues in our unaudited
statements of operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
Nine Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Statement of Operations Data | Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 152,005,191 | 100.0 | % | $ | 120,224,231 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of Goods Sold |
142,269,909 | 93.6 | % | 131,037,251 | 109.0 | % | ||||||||||
Gross Profit (Loss) |
9,735,282 | 6.4 | % | (10,813,020 | ) | (9.0 | )% | |||||||||
General and
Administrative |
||||||||||||||||
Expenses |
3,161,325 | 2.1 | % | 3,853,031 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||
Operating Income (Loss) |
6,573,957 | 4.3 | % | (14,666,051 | ) | (12.2 | )% | |||||||||
Other (Expense) |
(5,404,974 | ) | (3.6 | )% | (9,282,683 | ) | (7.7 | )% | ||||||||
Net Income (Loss) |
$ | 1,168,983 | 0.8 | % | (23,948,734 | ) | (19.9 | )% |
19
Table of Contents
Revenues
Our revenues from operations come from two primary sources: sales of fuel ethanol and sales of
distillers grains.
The following table shows additional data regarding production and price levels for our
primary inputs and products for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
Percentage of Increase (Decrease) | ||||
For comparison of Nine Months | ||||
Ended June 30, 2010 to June, 2009 | ||||
Production: |
||||
Ethanol sold (gallons) |
13.16 | % | ||
Dried distillers grains sold (tons) |
17.26 | % | ||
Wet distillers grains sold (tons) |
1307.11 | % | ||
Revenues: |
||||
Ethanol average price per gallon |
7.24 | % | ||
Dried distillers grains revenue per gallon of ethanol sold |
(11.94 | )% | ||
Wet distillers grains revenue per gallon of ethanol sold |
300.0 | % | ||
Total revenue per gallon of ethanol sold |
4.39 | % | ||
Costs: |
||||
Corn cost per gallon of ethanol sold (including freight) |
(10.62 | )% | ||
Overhead and other direct costs per gallon of ethanol sold |
(27.84 | )% | ||
Total cost per gallon of ethanol sold |
(14.92 | )% |
In the nine month period ended June 30, 2010, ethanol sales comprised approximately 83% of our
revenues and distillers grains sales comprised approximately 17% of our revenues. For the nine
month period ended June 30, 2009, ethanol sales comprised approximately 81% of our revenue, without
accounting for ethanol hedging, and distillers grains sales comprised approximately 19% of our
revenue. Our revenues were higher for our first three quarters of fiscal year 2010 compared to the
same period of 2009 primarily as a result of our increase in ethanol production and an increase in
the sales price of our ethanol.
The average ethanol sales price we received for the nine month period ended June 30, 2010 was
approximately 7% higher than our average ethanol sales price for the comparable 2009 period.
Management attributes this increase in ethanol prices with the increase in commodity prices
generally as a result of the gradually improving economic situation in the United States.
Management anticipates the price of ethanol may increase during the last quarter of our 2010 fiscal
year as a result of an increase in fuel demand as we complete the summer driving season which,
historically, has positively affected the market prices of crude oil and gasoline.
The price we received for our dried distillers grains decreased by approximately 11% during
the nine month period ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period of 2009. Management
attributes this decrease in the price of our dried distillers grains to an decrease in the demand
for our distillers grains outside of our local market area. Our local market has also experienced
an increase in the supply of dried distillers grains from other sources which has placed downward
pressure on the price we receive for our distillers grains. Finally, the price of dried distillers
grains changes in proportion to the price of corn, which has decreased in the nine month period
ended June 30, 2010. Accordingly, we anticipate that the market price of distillers grains will
continue to be volatile as a result of changes in the price of corn and competing animal feed
substitutes such as soybean meal.
20
Table of Contents
Cost of Sales
Our costs of goods sold as a percentage of revenues were approximately 94% for the nine month
period ended June 30, 2010 compared to approximately 109% for the same period of 2009. Our two
largest costs of production are corn (78% of cost of goods sold for our nine months ended June 30,
2010) and natural gas (9% of cost of goods sold for our nine months ended June 30, 2010). Our cost
of goods sold decreased by approximately 15% in the nine months
ended June 30, 2010, compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2009, and our revenue for the
same period increased by approximately 4.5%. This decrease in the cost of goods sold is primarily a
result of weaker corn prices combined with an increase in the volume of corn processed at our
facility.
General and Administrative Expenses
Our general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues were lower for the nine
month period ended June 30, 2010 than they were for the same period ended June 30, 2009. These
percentages were approximately 2.1% and approximately 3.2% for the nine months ended June 30, 2010
and 2009, respectively. This decrease in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to a
decrease in legal fees and the costs associated with the initial training of our personnel during
the first few months of plant operations. Our management and staff has also increased operating
efficiencies and made a concerted effort to lower our general and administrative expenses. We
expect that going forward our general and administrative expenses will remain relatively steady.
Operating Income (Loss)
Our income from operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 was approximately 4.3% of
our revenues compared to loss of approximately 12.2% of our revenues for the nine months ended June
30, 2009. This increase in our profitability is primarily due to the increase in the price we
received for our ethanol for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the nine months ended
June 30, 2009 combined with a decrease in our costs of goods sold during the same timeframe.
Other (Expense)
Other expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, was approximately 3.6% of our revenue
and totaled approximately $5,405,000. Other expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 totaled
approximately $9,280,000 and was approximately 7.7% of our revenues. The decrease is attributable
to less interest expense and favorable unrealized gains on our interest rate swap. Interest expense
for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, was approximately $6,320,000. Interest expense for the
nine months ended June 30, 2009 was approximately $7,990,000. This reduction in interest expense is
due primarily to a reduction in our outstanding debt and fluctuations in interest rates.
Changes in Financial Condition for the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
We experienced an increase in our current assets at June 30, 2010 compared to our fiscal year
ended September 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2010, we had been experiencing positive margins which
enabled us to hold additional cash. We had approximately $1,735,000 more cash on hand at June 30,
2010 compared to September 30, 2009. However, at June 30, 2010 we had accounts receivable of
approximately $3,222,000 compared to approximately $4,081,000 of accounts receivable at September
30, 2009.
Our net property and equipment was slightly lower at June 30, 2010 compared to September 30,
2009 as a result of depreciation expense taken for the nine months ended June 30, 2010. We do not
expect any significant additional capital expenditures as our plant is now complete.
We experienced a decrease in our total current liabilities on June 30, 2010 compared to
September 30, 2009 and also a decrease in our long-term liabilities as of June 30, 2010 compared to
September 30, 2009, primarily as a result of principal payments made on our long-term debt. At
June 30, 2010, we had approximately $100,711,000 outstanding in the form of long-term loans less
current maturities, compared to approximately $103,325,000 at September 30, 2009.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have completed approximately twenty-one months of operations as of the filing of this
report. The relative price levels of corn, ethanol and distillers grains have resulted in tight,
and sometimes negative, operating margins. We had positive earnings for the nine month period
ended June 30, 2010. However, if substantial losses return, or if we are unable to obtain
additional working capital, liquidity concerns may require us to curtail
operations or pursue other actions that could adversely affect future operations.
21
Table of Contents
In June 2010 we amended our Senior Credit Agreement and our Accounts Agreement with WestLB.
Pursuant to the amended loan agreements we were required to have a working capital deficit of
$12,000,000 or less as of June 30, 2010. We met that requirement by having a working capital
deficit at June 30, 2010 of approximately $11,100,000. The required working capital threshold
tightens for the quarters ending September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2010. We are required to have
a working capital deficit of $9,000,000 or less as of September 30, 2010 and $7,000,000 or less as
of December 31, 2010. Subsequent to December 31, 2010 the working capital deficit requirement will
remain at $7,000,000 for the term of the loan.
In the event we are unable to meet the level of working capital required under the amended
loan agreements we will be assessed a five percent (5%) fee on the outstanding loans for any
quarter we are not in compliance. This fee payment is in addition to the interest we are required
to pay on our outstanding debt pursuant to our original loan agreements. This additional interest
fee will be accrued and due February 2015, the final maturity date our outstanding loans with West
LB. Furthermore, and regardless of whether we have maintained the required level or working
capital, we will be required to make an additional quarterly principal payment of $150,000 toward
our outstanding working capital loan balance.
The following table shows cash flows for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
Nine Months Ended June 30 | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net cash provided by (used in ) operating activities |
$ | 7,102,795 | $ | (20,218,170 | ) | |||
Net cash (used in) investing activities |
(198,865 | ) | (3,469,014 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(5,169,222 | ) | 22,990,457 | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
1,734,708 | (696,727 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 1,734,708 | $ | 6,989,251 |
Operating Cash Flows: We experienced a significant increase in net cash provided by
operating activities during the nine months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period of
2009. This increase in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily a result of the
significant increase in net income we experienced during the nine months ended June 30, 2010. Cash
provided by operating activities was $7,102,795 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 compared to
$20,218,170 of cash used in operations for the same period in 2009. Our net income from operations
for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 was $1,168,983 due to slightly favorable market conditions.
Investing Cash Flows: Cash used in investing activities was $198,865 for the nine
months ended June 30, 2010. This amount is small when compared to the $3,469,014 used in investing
activities for nine months ended June 30, 2009, when we finished investing in our property and
equipment to complete the plant.
Financing Cash Flows: Cash used in financing activities was $5,169,222 for the nine
months ended June 30, 2010 and was primarily for the repayment of long-term debt and capital lease
obligations. During our nine months ended June 30, 2009 we received notes and line of credit
proceeds of approximately $22,990,000 to fund our property and equipment as well as our working
capital.
Our liquidity, results of operations and financial performance will be impacted by many
variables, including the market price for commodities such as, but not limited to, corn, ethanol
and other energy commodities, as well as the market price for any co-products generated by the
facility and the cost of labor and other operating costs. Assuming future relative price levels
for corn, ethanol and distillers grains remain consistent with the relative price levels as of June
30, 2010 and assuming we have the liquidity necessary to operate the plant at nameplate capacity,
we expect operations to generate adequate cash flows to maintain operations. This expectation
assumes that we will be able to sell all the ethanol that is produced at the plant. We expect to
be able to satisfy our cash requirements for the next 12 months using only our revolving line of
credit, senior credit facility, and earnings from operations.
22
Table of Contents
Senior Credit Facility
On November 20, 2007, First United and Southwest Georgia Ethanol, LLC (SWGE), our wholly
owned subsidiary, entered into a senior credit agreement with WestLB that provides for (1) a
construction loan facility in an aggregate amount of up to $100,000,000 which converted to a term
loan on February 20, 2009 (the Conversion Date) which matures on February 20, 2015 (the Final
Maturity Date); and (2) a working capital loan in an aggregate amount of up to $15,000,000 which
matures on February 20, 2011. The primary purpose of the senior credit facility was to finance the
construction and operation of our ethanol plant.
The principal amount of the term loan facility is payable in quarterly payments ranging from
$1,500,000 to $1,600,000, and the remaining principal amounts are fully due and payable on the
Final Maturity Date. We made the first three quarterly term loan payments due through June 30,
2010.
Subordinated Debt
On November 30, 2006, we closed a subordinated debt financing arrangement pursuant to which
the Mitchell County Development Authority issued $10,000,000 of revenue bonds that were placed with
Wachovia Bank. We signed a promissory note, which is collateralized by our assets and the proceeds
were placed in a Bond Trustee account with Regions Bank. The interest rate for this note is 7.5%.
We are required to maintain a debt service reserve with the Bond Trustee in the amount of
$1,180,000. The Bond Trustee made the annual interest and principal payment to the bond holders of
approximately $1,339,000 in December 2009. The funds held in the Bond Trustee account are
classified as non-current restricted cash and cash equivalents on our consolidated balance sheet.
The subordinated debt is a 15 year note with principal payments to be made to bond holders each
December. The principal payment due in December 2010 is $635,000.
On June 30, 2009 we agreed on the amount due to Fagen, Inc. for retainage withheld under our
design-build contract. As consideration for Fagen, Inc.s completion of our facility, we executed
a subordinated promissory note dated June 30, 2009 in favor of Fagen, Inc. in the amount of
approximately $4,000,000. The first principal payment of $500,000 was due September 30, 2009 and
annual principal payments of $1,738,772 are due June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2011. The note is
subordinated to the WestLB debt agreement, which currently prohibits the Company from making any
principal payments on the schedule described above.
Other Notes Payable
We have financed the acquisition of certain equipment through two notes payable to John Deere
Credit. The notes amortize over four years with monthly principal and interest payments and are
secured by the equipment. The interest rate is 5.3%. The combined outstanding balance on these
two notes payable is $153,022 and $202,050 as of June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009,
respectively.
Our long-term debt outstanding as of June 30, 2010 is summarized as follows:
West LB Term Loan, variable interest rates from 4.00% to 7.81% |
$ | 93,800,000 | ||
Subordinated Fagen Note, interest rate of 4.0% through June 20, 2010 and 8% thereafter |
3,977,545 | |||
Subordinated debt facility, interest rate of 7.5% |
9,250,000 | |||
Notes payable John Deere Credit, interest rate of 5.3% |
153,022 | |||
107,180,567 | ||||
Less current portion |
(6,469,366 | ) | ||
Long-term debt outstanding as of June 30, 2010 |
$ | 100,711,201 | ||
23
Table of Contents
Debt Covenants
Pursuant to the amended loan agreements we were required to have a working capital deficit of
$12,000,000 or less as of June 30, 2010. We met that requirement by having a working capital
deficit at June 30, 2010 of approximately $11,100,000. The required working capital threshold tightens for the
quarters ending September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2010. We are required to have a working
capital deficit of $9,000,000 or less as of September 30, 2010 and $7,000,000 or less as of
December 31, 2010. Subsequent to December 31, 2010 the working capital deficit requirement will
remain at $7,000,000 for the term of the loan.
In the event we are unable to meet the level of working capital required under the amended
loan agreements we will be assessed a five percent (5%) fee on the outstanding loans for any
quarter we are not in compliance. This fee payment is in addition to the interest we are required
to pay on our outstanding debt pursuant to our original loan agreements. This additional interest
fee will be accrued and due February 2015, the final maturity date our outstanding loans with West
LB. Furthermore, and regardless of whether we have maintained the required level or working
capital, we will be required to make an additional quarterly principal payment of $150,000 toward
our outstanding working capital loan balance.
Summary of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing our financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the
reported revenues and expenses. The fair value of our cash and equivalents approximates their
carrying value.
Derivative Instruments
We occasionally enter into short-term cash grain, option and futures contracts as a means of
securing corn for the ethanol plant and managing exposure to changes in commodity. We may also
enter into short-term forward, option and futures contracts for sales of ethanol to manage exposure
to changes in energy prices. All of our derivatives are designated as non-hedge derivatives, and
accordingly are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income.
Although the contracts are considered economic hedges of specified risks, they are not designated
as and accounted for as hedging instruments.
As part of our trading activity, we use futures and option contracts offered through regulated
commodity exchanges to reduce our risk and we are exposed to risk of loss in the market value of
inventories. To reduce that risk, we generally take positions using cash and futures contracts and
options.
Unrealized gains and losses related to derivative contracts for corn purchases are included as
a component of cost of goods sold and derivative contracts related to ethanol sales are included as
a component of revenues in the accompanying financial statements. The fair values of derivative
contracts are presented on the accompanying balance sheet as derivative financial instruments.
Lower of cost or market accounting for inventory and forward purchase contracts
With the significant change in the prices of our main inputs and outputs, the lower of cost or
market analysis of inventories and purchase commitments can have a significant impact on our
financial performance. The impact of market activity related to pricing of corn and ethanol will
require us to continuously evaluate the pricing of our inventory and purchase commitments under a
lower of cost or market analysis.
Impairment Analysis
Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred; major improvements and betterments
are capitalized. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. An impairment
loss would be recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows from operations are less
than the carrying value of the asset group. An impairment loss would be measured by the amount by
which the carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. In accordance with our
policies, management has evaluated the plant for possible impairment based on projected future cash
flows from operations. Management has determined that its projected future cash flows from
operations exceed the carrying value of the plant and that no impairment exists at June 30, 2010.
24
Table of Contents
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, derivative instruments, other
receivables, accounts payable, accrued expenses and long-term debt. Management believes the fair
value of each of these financial instruments approximates their carrying value in the balance sheet
as of the balance sheet date. The fair value of current financial instruments is estimated to
approximate carrying value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The fair value of
derivative financial instruments is based on quoted market prices. The fair value of the long-term
debt is estimated based on anticipated interest rates which management believes would currently be
available to the Company for similar issues of debt, taking into account the current credit risk of
the Company and the other market factors.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks
We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and are not required to provide information under this item.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Management of FUEL is responsible for maintaining disclosure controls and procedures that are
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files
or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms. In addition, the disclosure controls and procedures must ensure that
such information is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including its Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
required financial and other required disclosures.
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Murray Campbell, along with our Chief
Financial Officer, Larry Kamp, have reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a 15(e) under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended)
as of June 30, 2010. Based upon this review and evaluation, these officers have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods required by the forms and rules of the Securities
and Exchange Commission; and to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by an issuer
in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to
our management including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or person
performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by this quarterly report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
As of the date of this quarterly report, we are not aware of any material pending legal
proceeding to which we are a party or of which any of our property is subject, other than ordinary
routine litigation, if any, that is incidental to our business.
25
Table of Contents
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
You should carefully read and consider the risks and uncertainties below and the other
information contained in this report. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only
ones we may face. The following risks, together with additional risks and uncertainties not
currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial could impair our financial condition and
results of operation.
Risks Relating to Our Business
The California Low Carbon Fuel Standard may decrease demand for corn based ethanol which could
negatively impact our profitability. Recently, California passed a Low Carbon Fuels Standard
(LCFS). The California LCFS requires that renewable fuels used in California must accomplish
certain reductions in greenhouse gases which are measured using a lifecycle analysis. Management
believes that these new regulations could preclude corn based ethanol produced in the Midwest from
being used in California. California represents a significant ethanol demand market. If we are
unable to supply ethanol to California, it could significantly reduce demand for the ethanol we
produce. Any decrease in ethanol demand could negatively impact ethanol prices which could reduce
our revenues and negatively impact our ability to profitably operate the ethanol plant.
If the Federal Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit (VEETC) expires on December 31, 2010, it
could negatively impact our profitability. The ethanol industry is benefited by VEETC which is a
federal excise tax credit of 45 cents per gallon of ethanol blended with gasoline. This excise tax
credit is referred to as the blenders credit and is set to expire on December 31, 2010. Although
the blenders credit is not paid to the ethanol producer, we believe that VEETC positively impacts
the price of ethanol. If the portion of VEETC that benefits ethanol is allowed to expire, it could
negatively impact the price we receive for our ethanol and could negatively impact our
profitability.
If the secondary tariff on imported ethanol is allowed to expire in January 2011, we could see
an increase in ethanol produced in foreign countries being marked in the Untied States which could
negatively impact our profitability. The secondary tariff on imported ethanol is a 54 cent per
gallon tariff on ethanol imports from certain foreign countries. The secondary tariff on imported
ethanol is scheduled to expire in January 2011. If this tariff is allowed to expire, an influx of
imported ethanol on the domestic ethanol market could have a significant negative impact on ethanol
prices and our profitability.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
26
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits. The following exhibits are included herein:
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
10.1 | Fourth Amendment to Accounts Agreement between Southwest
Georgia Ethanol, LLC and WestLB Ag dated June 7, 2010. |
|||
10.2 | Sixth Amendment to Senior Credit Agreement between Southwest
Georgia Ethanol, LLC and WestLB Ag dated June 7, 2010. |
|||
31.1 | Certificate Pursuant to 17 CFR 240.15d-14(a). |
|||
31.2 | Certificate Pursuant to 17 CFR 240.15d-14(a). |
|||
32.1 | Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. |
|||
32.2 | Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
FIRST UNITED ETHANOL, LLC |
||||
Date: August 16, 2010 | /s/ Murray Campbell | |||
Murray Campbell | ||||
Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Date: August 16, 2010 | /s/ Lawrence Kamp | |||
Lawrence Kamp | ||||
Chief Financial Officer |
27