Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-23.1 - EX-23.1 - UniTek Global Services, Inc. | v192266_ex23-1.htm |
EX-23.2 - EX-23.2 - UniTek Global Services, Inc. | v192266_ex23-2.htm |
As
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13,
2010
Registration
No. 333-
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM
S-1
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT UNDER THE
SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
UniTek
Global Services, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
4812
|
75-2233445
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
(Primary
Standard Industrial
Classification
Code Number)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
1777
Sentry Parkway West
Gwynedd
Hall, Suite 302
Blue
Bell, Pennsylvania 19422
267-464-1700
(Address,
including zip code and telephone number,
including area code, of
registrant’s principal executive
offices)
C.
Scott Hisey
Chief
Executive Officer
1777
Sentry Parkway West
Gwynedd
Hall, Suite 302
Blue
Bell, Pennsylvania 19422
267-464-1700
(Name,
address, including zip code and telephone number,
including area code, of agent
for service)
With copies to:
Justin
W. Chairman, Esq.
Morgan,
Lewis & Bockius LLP
1701
Market Street
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103
Telephone:
(215) 963-5000
Facsimile:
(215) 963-5001
|
R.
Scott Shean, Esq.
B.
Shayne Kennedy, Esq.
Latham
& Watkins LLP
650
Town Center Drive, 20th
Floor
Costa
Mesa, California 92626
Telephone:
(714) 540-1235
Facsimile:
(714) 755-8290
|
Approximate date of commencement of
proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this
registration statement becomes effective.
If any of
the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or
continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933,
check the following box. ¨
If this
Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to
Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the
Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering. ¨
If this
Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the
Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. ¨
If this
Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the
Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large
accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated
filer ¨
|
Non-accelerated
filer ¨
(Do
not check if a smaller
reporting
company)
|
Smaller
reporting company x
|
CALCULATION
OF REGISTRATION FEE
Title of Each
Class of Securities
to be Registered
|
Proposed Maximum Aggregate
Offering Price(1)(2)
|
Amount of Registration Fee
|
||||||
Common stock, par value $0.00002 per
share
|
$ | 86,250,000 | $ | 6,150 |
(1) Estimated
solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee pursuant to
Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended.
(2) Includes
shares that the underwriter has the option to purchase to cover over-allotment,
if any.
The Registrant hereby amends this
Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its
effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become
effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or
until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the
Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may
determine.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not
sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell
these securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any
state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
PRELIMINARY
PROSPECTUS
|
SUBJECT
TO COMPLETION, DATED
|
AUGUST
13, 2010
|
UniTek
Global Services, Inc.
Common
Stock
$ per
share
We are
offering shares of our common stock by this
prospectus.
Our
common stock is currently listed on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board under
the symbol “UGLB.OB.” As of August 12, 2010, the last reported sale
price of our common stock was $0.75 per share. We are applying to
list our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “UNTK,”
concurrently with the consummation of this offering.
Investing
in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should read this
entire prospectus carefully, including the section entitled “Risk Factors”
beginning on page 9.
Per Share
|
Total
|
|||||||
Public
offering price
|
$ | $ | ||||||
Underwriting
discount and commissions
|
$ | $ | ||||||
Proceeds,
before expenses, to us
|
$ | $ |
Neither the Securities and Exchange
Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
We have
granted the underwriter an option, exercisable within 30 days after the date of
this prospectus, to purchase up to additional
shares of our common stock upon the same terms and conditions as the shares
offered by this prospectus to cover over-allotments, if any.
The
underwriter expects to deliver the shares of common stock to purchasers on or
about , 2010.
Roth
Capital Partners
The date of this prospectus
is ,
2010.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Page
|
|
Prospectus
Summary
|
1
|
Risk
Factors
|
9
|
Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
|
18
|
Use
of Proceeds
|
19
|
Price
Range of Common Stock
|
20
|
Dividend
Policy
|
20
|
Capitalization
|
21
|
Dilution
|
23
|
Selected
Consolidated Financial Data
|
25
|
Adjusted EBITDA | 28 |
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
29
|
Business
|
39
|
Management
|
48
|
Executive
Compensation
|
53
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
|
63
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions, Director
Independence
|
67
|
Description
of Securities
|
70
|
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for Non-U.S. Holders of Common
Stock
|
73
|
Underwriting
|
75
|
Legal
Matters
|
77
|
Experts
|
77
|
Incorporation
by Reference
|
77
|
Where
You Can Find More Information
|
78
|
Index
to Financial Statements
|
F-i
|
You
should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference in
this prospectus and in any free writing prospectus that we have authorized for
use in connection with this offering. Neither we nor the underwriter has
authorized any other person to provide you with additional or different
information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information,
you should not rely on it. Neither we nor the underwriter is making an offer to
sell these securities in any jurisdiction where an offer or sale is not
permitted. You should assume that the information in this prospectus is accurate
only as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus, regardless of the
time of delivery of this prospectus or any sale of our common stock. Our
business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have
changed since that date.
Some of
the industry and market data contained in this prospectus are based on
independent industry publications or other publicly available information, while
other information is based on our internal sources. Although we believe that
each source is reliable as of its respective date, the information contained in
such sources has not been independently verified, and neither we nor the
underwriter can assure you as to the accuracy or completeness of this
information.
TRADEMARKS, TRADE NAMES AND SERVICE
MARKS
UniTek
and UniTek Global Services are trademarks of UniTek Global Services, Inc. All
other service marks, trademarks and trade names referred to in this prospectus
are the property of their respective owners. Solely for convenience, any
trademarks referred to in this prospectus may appear without the ® symbol, but
such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that the owner of such
trademark will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, its
rights or the right of the applicable licensor to these
trademarks.
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights certain
information described in more detail later in this prospectus. This summary is
not complete and does not contain all the information you should consider before
investing in our common stock. You should carefully read the more detailed
information set out in this prospectus, especially the risks related to our
business and investing in our common stock that we discuss under the headings
“Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations,” as well as the consolidated financial statements and
related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus or incorporated by
reference herein. References in this prospectus to “we,” “us,” “our,” “the
Company,” “our Company,” and “UniTek” refer to UniTek Global Services, Inc. and
its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context requires
otherwise.
UniTek
Global Services
We are a
leading full-service provider of permanently outsourced infrastructure services,
offering an end-to-end suite of technical services to the wireless and wireline
telecommunications, satellite television and broadband cable industries in the
United States and Canada. Our services include network engineering and
design, construction and project management, comprehensive installation and
fulfillment, and wireless telecommunication infrastructure services. Our
primary client base consists of blue-chip, Fortune 200 companies in the media
and telecommunications industry, including such customers as DIRECTV, AT&T,
Clearwire Communications, Ericsson, Sprint, T-Mobile, Comcast, Cox
Communications, Verizon Communications, Charter Communications and Time Warner
Cable. We also serve significant Canadian customers, such as Rogers Cable
and Cogeco Cable. Our clients rely on our services to build and maintain
their infrastructure and networks, and provide residential and commercial
fulfillment services, all of which are critical to our clients’ ability to
deliver voice, video and data services to their end users. The majority of
our services are performed under long-term master agreements.
Our
operating philosophy promotes a culture of visibility and accountability and is
focused on achieving efficiencies and surpassing each customer’s performance
standards. All of our operating subsidiaries utilize our shared services
platform, which consists of accounting, fleet management, insurance, safety,
legal and corporate resources at our corporate headquarters. We have developed a
standardized set of technology enabled, real-time monitoring and reporting
capabilities, which we refer to as our Premium Real-time Operating System, or
PROS. We rely on PROS to provide detailed, real-time reports on various
performance metrics. We believe this enables management to respond rapidly
to optimize operational performance. By maintaining a centralized,
technology-enabled shared services function, we believe we can better manage our
business, control costs, and apply universal financial and operational controls
and procedures. Our shared services platform has been engineered to be
highly scalable and we believe that it can support a large increase in business
without significant modifications.
Our
strategy has enabled us to grow and scale our business units across a
diversified set of customers, geographies and end markets by executing to the
highest performance standards. We intend to leverage our high quality
performance, commitment to technology and shared service platform to grow our
revenue and profitability.
We
deliver a broad range of specialized services to our customers,
including:
|
·
|
Network
Engineering and Design. We are a provider of turn-key
engineering and design services to the wireless and wireline industries
that require underground plant construction, aerial infrastructure and
multi-dwelling content delivery. We have a suite of network permit, design
and engineering operations that facilitate the construction of fiber cable
placement and splicing from the user’s premises through to the service
providers’ distribution center.
|
|
·
|
Construction
and Project Management. We are a full-service provider
to the cable and wireline telecommunications industries of project
management and construction services, including systems engineering,
aerial and underground construction and project
management.
|
|
·
|
Installation
and Fulfillment Services. We are a
full-service provider of residential and commercial installation services
to the satellite television and broadband cable industries. We
provide regional fulfillment services including warehousing and logistics,
call centers, inventory management, customer service compliance, fleet
management and risk and safety compliance
services.
|
- 1
-
·
|
Wireless
Telecommunications Infrastructure Services. We provide
outsourced project management, construction and infrastructure services to
wireless telecommunication companies nationwide. Our core activities
include communications infrastructure equipment construction, engineering
and installation; radio frequency and network design and engineering;
radio transmission base station installation and modification; and
in-building network design, engineering and construction.
Additionally, we provide site acquisition services where we act as an
intermediary between our clients and property owners and facilitate the
wireless site preparation process from selection through
construction.
|
We report
our results in two segments: Fulfillment and Engineering &
Construction. These reportable segments are based on the services we
provide and the industries we serve. Our Fulfillment segment primarily
serves the satellite television and cable industries, where we provide
outsourced installation, upgrade and network management services. Our
Engineering & Construction segment primarily serves the wireless and
wireline telecommunications industries, where we provide engineering, design,
construction and project management services.
For the
fiscal years 2008 and 2009, we had revenues from continuing operations of $215.8
million and $278.1 million, respectively, representing growth of 28.9%. For the
three months ended April 4, 2009 and April 3, 2010, we had revenues of $68.7
million and $89.0 million, respectively, representing growth of 29.5%. On
January 27, 2010, we consummated a merger with UniTek Holdings, Inc., or
Holdings, pursuant to which our subsidiary merged, the Merger, with and into
Holdings and Holdings became our wholly owned subsidiary. For accounting
purposes, Holdings was considered the accounting acquirer, however, the Merger
was structured so that we were the surviving entity. On a pro forma basis
reflecting the combined companies, our fiscal 2009 revenues were $347.5
million.
Industry
Overview and Opportunity
We
believe the following industry trends will increase the size of the permanently
outsourced infrastructure services industry:
|
·
|
Faster
Technology Upgrade Cycles. The evolution of
technology has become more rapid, creating demand for increasingly faster
and more robust voice, video and data services. To support these
next generation services, communication service providers have been
investing a significant amount of capital to increase the capacity and
performance of their networks. In addition, state and local
governments have started to push for technology upgrades and enhanced
services. In February 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act, or ARRA, was passed, and local governments, municipalities and others
have begun receiving funds for construction activities, many of which are
directly related to our areas of expertise, such as the engineering and
construction of communications networks. More than $7.0 billion of
the funds to be issued under the ARRA are earmarked to build broadband
facilities throughout the United States. As of May 2010, $2.3
billion had already been awarded to states to underwrite nearly 200
broadband projects across the country. Providers of these services
have historically outsourced the design, construction and maintenance of
their data networks to third parties in order to minimize their fixed
costs and number of employees. As these providers roll-out new
technologies and capabilities, we believe the demand for permanently
outsourced infrastructure services will
increase.
|
|
·
|
Wireless
Telecommunications Industry Trends. In the United
States, CTIA-The Wireless Association, or CTIA, estimates that as of
December 2009 there were 285.6 million wireless subscribers using 2.3
trillion annualized minutes. We believe that the opportunity for growth is
significant as the telecommunications industry continues to release
upgrades and new products. According to CTIA, the number of cell sites has
increased from approximately 180,000 in 2005 to approximately 250,000 in
2009. Furthermore, CTIA estimated wireless carriers invested more
than $20.0 billion upgrading their operations and expanding their
networks’ coverage in 2009. The Telecommunication Industry
Association forecasts the number of cell sites to increase to 438,000 in
2013.
|
In
addition, the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, has issued, and we
expect it will continue to issue licenses that
grant access to new wireless spectrums to new and existing wireless service
providers. A recent example of this is LightSquared, a company funded by
Harbinger Capital to develop a state-of-the-art 4G open wireless broadband
network. In July 2010, LightSquared announced that it had partnered with
Nokia Siemens Networks for network design, equipment manufacturing and
installation and network operations and maintenance services in an agreement
worth approximately $7.0 billion over eight years.
- 2
-
·
|
Satellite
Industry Trends.
According to the Satellite Broadcasting & Communications
Association, as of December 2009, there were approximately 32.7 million
satellite television subscribers compared to 30.6 million as of December
2007. As digital video providers in the satellite, cable and
telecommunications industries increase their competition for subscribers,
we believe the number of gross subscriber additions and disconnections
will continue to increase, increasing the demand for our services.
Additionally, satellite providers spend a significant portion of their
retention marketing budgets on subscriber upgrade initiatives, which
typically rely on our fulfillment services in the markets we
service.
|
|
·
|
Cable
Industry Trends.
The National Cable & Telecommunications Association, or NCTA,
estimates there were approximately 62.1 million cable subscribers in the
United States in 2009, compared to 66.6 million in 2000. Cable
providers have been able to increase revenues despite a declining
subscriber base by increasing higher-end services, such as high-definition
video, digital video recorders, video-on-demand, high speed data and
telephony. All of these new services require higher capacity
networks, which has driven increased capital expenditures. In fact,
the NCTA estimates that between 2000 and 2009, the cable industry spent
over $131.0 billion on infrastructure
investments.
|
|
·
|
Continued
Convergence of Services. The communications
industry is facing increasing demand for current and future
services. Providers are reporting that data traffic, including Web
access, video messaging and other services, has begun to outpace voice
traffic. In order to support all of these services, there is, and
will continue to be, a need to increase the backhaul capacity. According
to Infonetics Research, mobile backhaul spending rose 21% to $7.2 billion
in 2009 and is expected to rise 44% by 2014 to $10.4 billion. The
demand for backhaul links will continue to increase with the convergence
of services. In addition, we believe that downstream demand from
other communications providers, such as internet service providers,
satellite operators and telecommunication resellers, who utilize backhaul
infrastructure to provide their services, will continue to increase.
As demand for these services increases, communication service providers
will need to invest capital to improve their networks to accommodate the
demand for increased capacity, which we expect should in turn increase the
demand for permanently outsourced infrastructure
services.
|
Our
Business Strengths
We
believe the following business strengths position us well to grow our
business:
|
·
|
Operational
Execution. Our operating philosophy promotes a culture of
visibility and accountability focused on achieving efficiencies and
surpassing each customer’s performance standards. Combined with our
shared services platform, PROS leads to our operational execution by
creating real-time accountability by enabling rapid detection and
correction of operational issues that could potentially impact
performance, productivity and profitability. We believe that our high
quality operational procedures create high customer satisfaction and
comprehensive employee accountability, setting the foundation for
continuous expansion and growth.
|
|
·
|
Single
Source Service Provider. As the communications
market continues to evolve due to high bandwidth driven applications, we
believe the once disparate wireline and wireless industry segments will
continue to converge into a ubiquitous technology landscape. As a
result, these industry segments will need service providers who can bridge
these two merging technologies. We intend to leverage our wireline
and wireless turn-key services to capitalize on our customers’ capital
spend. We believe that our ability to leverage our expertise in many
communications technologies provides us with a competitive advantage as
our customers have build out plans that require this expertise as their
services converge.
|
|
·
|
Large
Footprint and Strong Customer Relationships. As of August 4, 2010,
our network includes 102 locations and a workforce of approximately 5,200
across the United States and Canada. Our customer base primarily
consists of blue-chip, Fortune 200 companies in the media and
telecommunications industries, including such customers as DIRECTV,
AT&T, Clearwire Communications, Ericsson, Sprint, T-Mobile, Comcast,
Cox Communications, Verizon Communications, Charter Communications and
Time Warner Cable. We also serve significant Canadian customers,
such as Rogers Cable and Cogeco
Cable.
|
- 3
-
·
|
Reputation
for Reliable Customer Service and Technical Expertise. We believe the
strength of our customer relationships is a direct result of our leading
customer service and technical expertise. In addition, we further
differentiate ourselves from our competitors through our integration of
various technologies into our business, including GPS devices in our
fleet, handheld equipment to streamline technician work order closure,
inventory consumption and iPhone deployment to document quality and safety
observations. We believe our reputation for excellent quality,
customer service and technical expertise gives us an advantage in
competing for new contracts as well as in maintaining and extending our
current customer relationships.
|
|
·
|
Experienced
Management Team. Our management team,
with an average of approximately 19 years of industry experience, plays a
significant role in establishing and maintaining long-term relationships
with our customers, supporting the growth of our business and managing the
financial aspects of our
operations.
|
Our
Strategy
The key
elements of our business strategy are:
|
·
|
Execute on
Existing Backlog. Our backlog
consists of uncompleted portions of services to be performed under
job-specific contracts and the estimated value of future services that we
expect to provide under master service agreements and other long-term
contracts. Many of our contracts are multi-year agreements. We
include in our backlog the amount of services projected to be performed
over the terms of the contracts, where applicable, or based on our
historical experience with customers and our experience in procurements of
this type. As of July 3, 2010, our current three-year backlog was
approximately $735 million. We intend to work closely with our
customers to ensure we execute on our already signed contracts at a
performance level that exceeds our customers’ services
requirements.
|
|
·
|
Expand and
Diversify our Backlog. We are
focused on growing and diversifying our backlog through strengthening our
relationships with existing customers and building relationships with new
customers. We will continue to utilize our reputation for quality
and service, together with our differentiated technological capabilities,
to win new contracts from our existing and new
customers.
|
|
·
|
Increase
Efficiency through Continued Development of our Technology.
We plan to continue to develop our PROS and other technologies in
an effort to ensure we have the capabilities needed to effectively and
profitably manage our operations.
|
|
·
|
Pursue
Selective Acquisitions. We plan to continue to selectively
pursue strategic acquisitions that complement our existing business by (i)
diversifying our service offerings, customers, end markets and
geographies, (ii) adding experienced managers to the UniTek management
team and (iii) strengthening our financial
profile.
|
Proposed
Changes to Our Capital Structure
Proposed
Reverse Stock Split
On August
4, 2010, we received the consent of the requisite number of beneficial owners of
our common stock to amend our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation,
or Charter, to effect a reverse split of our common stock at a ratio not less
than one-to-eight and not greater than one-to-thirty, with the exact ratio to be
set within such range in the discretion of our board of directors without
further approval or authorization of our stockholders, with our board of
directors having the ultimate discretion as to whether or not to proceed with
the reverse split. Our board of directors has determined that, concurrently with
the closing of this offering, the shares of our common stock then outstanding
will be subject to a reverse split on a
one-for- basis.
- 4
-
Expected
Conversion of Series B Preferred
Each
share of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.00002 per share,
or Series B Preferred, is convertible at any time, at the option of the holder
thereof, into shares of our common stock. According to its terms, each
share of Series B Preferred is (i) convertible into 50 shares of common stock,
subject to standard structural anti-dilution adjustments for stock splits,
dividends and similar events, and (ii) entitled to a two-for-one liquidation
preference in certain circumstances, including the currently contemplated
conversion. See “Description of Securities – Description of Preferred
Stock – Series B Preferred.”
In order
to help facilitate this offering by allowing for a simplified capital structure,
the holders of the Series B Preferred have agreed to convert their stock into
shares of our common stock upon the consummation of this offering. As an
inducement to agree to such conversion, we agreed to modify the conversion
price, while also giving effect to the two-for-one liquidation preference, such
that it will be a price representing a 6.5% discount to the offering price to
the public of the common shares in this offering. Assuming a public
offering price of $ per share, the Series B
Preferred would convert
into shares of our common
stock. The conversion will also be adjusted to give effect to the proposed
reverse split of the shares of our common stock on a
one-for- basis.
Corporate
Information
We were
organized as a corporation under the laws of the State of Delaware in 1987, as
Adina, Inc.
On
January 27, 2010, we entered into a merger agreement with Holdings, pursuant to
which our subsidiary merged with and into Holdings and Holdings became our
wholly owned subsidiary. For accounting purposes, Holdings was considered the
accounting acquirer, however, the Merger was structured so that we were the
surviving entity. On June 4, 2010, we changed our corporate name from
Berliner Communications, Inc. to UniTek Global Services, Inc.
Throughout
this prospectus, we refer to various service marks and trade names that we use
in our business. Other trademarks and service marks appearing in this
prospectus are the property of their respective holders.
In this
prospectus, the terms “UniTek,” “we,” “us,” “our” and “the Company” refer to
UniTek Global Services, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Our
principal executive offices are located at 1777 Sentry Parkway West, Blue Bell,
Pennsylvania, 19422 and our telephone number is (267) 464-1700. Our website
address is www.unitekgs.com. The
information contained therein or connected thereto shall not be deemed to be
incorporated into this prospectus or the registration statement of which it
forms a part.
- 5
-
The
Offering
|
|||||||||||
Common
stock offered by us
|
shares
|
||||||||||
Common
stock outstanding
immediately
after this offering
|
shares
(1)
|
||||||||||
Use
of proceeds
|
The
proceeds from the sale of common stock offered by this prospectus will be
used to retire a portion of our current indebtedness and the remainder for
working capital and other general corporate purposes. See “Use of
Proceeds.”
|
||||||||||
Over-the-Counter
Bulletin Board
trading
symbol
|
“UGLB.OB.”
|
||||||||||
Proposed
NASDAQ Global Market trading symbol
|
“UNTK”
|
||||||||||
Risk
factors
|
See
“Risk Factors” beginning on page 9 for a discussion of factors you should
carefully consider before deciding to invest in our common
stock.
|
||||||||||
(1)
The number of shares of our common stock outstanding immediately after
this offering is based on 136,778,330 shares outstanding as of August 4,
2010 and excludes:
|
|||||||||||
·
|
18,095,434
shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options
at a weighted average exercise price of $2.30 per
share;
|
||||||||||
·
|
18,095,434
shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options
at a weighted average exercise price of $2.30 per
share;
|
||||||||||
·
|
8,703,572
shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants at a
weighted average exercise price of $1.50 per share;
|
||||||||||
·
|
the
shares reserved for issuance under our 2009 Omnibus Equity and Incentive
Compensation Plan, under which we are entitled to grant a number of shares
equal to 10% of the issued and outstanding shares of common
stock;
|
||||||||||
·
|
shares
issuable pursuant to the underwriter’s over-allotment option;
and
|
||||||||||
·
|
the
conversion of all outstanding shares of our Series B Preferred into shares
of common stock, based on an assumed public offering price of $ per
share.
|
||||||||||
·
|
that,
concurrently with the closing of this offering, the shares of our common
stock then outstanding will be subject to a reverse split on a one-for-
basis; and
|
||||||||||
·
|
that
none of the anti-dilution adjustments provided in any of our outstanding
warrants or convertible preferred shares have been triggered by the
issuance of shares of our common stock in this
offering.
|
- 6
-
Reverse
Acquisition Accounting
On
January 27, 2010, Berliner Communications, Inc., or Berliner, BCI East,
Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Berliner, or
BCI East, and Holdings entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, the
Merger Agreement, pursuant to which BCI East merged with and into Holdings
and Holdings became a wholly owned subsidiary of Berliner. The
stockholders of Holdings received 0.012 shares of our Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock, par value $0.00002 per share, or Series A Preferred, and
0.40 shares of our common stock for each share of Holdings common stock
held by them, and each share of outstanding preferred stock of Holdings
was converted into the right to receive 0.02 shares of our Series B
Preferred. For accounting purposes, Holdings was considered the accounting
acquirer, however, the Merger was structured so that we were the surviving
entity. As a result, the Berliner assets and liabilities as of January 27,
2010, the effective time of the Merger, have been incorporated into our
balance sheets based on the fair market value of the assets acquired.
Further, our results of operations reflect the operating results of
Holdings before the Merger and the combined entity after the date of the
Merger. Upon the completion of the Merger, Berliner changed its
fiscal year end from June 30 to December 31. On June 4, 2010,
Berliner changed its name to UniTek Global Services, Inc.
Consolidated
Summary Financial Data
The
following table presents consolidated summary financial information. The
statement of operations and balance sheet data as of April 3, 2010 and for
the three months ended April 4, 2009, and April 3, 2010, have been derived
from Holdings’ unaudited consolidated financial statements and include the
financial results of Berliner from January 27, 2010 to April 3, 2010, and
in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments, necessary to state fairly the data for such
period. The statement of operations and balance sheet data as of and
for the years ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009 had been
derived from Holdings’ audited financial statements.
As
the accounting acquirer, Holdings’ prior year results are presented for
comparative purposes. The actual results for the quarter ending
April 3, 2010 are of Holdings’ for the entire period and include the
results of operations of Berliner from January 27, 2010. The actual
results for the quarter ended April 4, 2009 include only the results of
Holdings. The actual results for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2009 are of Holdings’ for the entire period.
All
amounts presented herein are expressed in thousands, except share and
per-share data, unless otherwise specifically noted.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended
|
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||
December 31,
2008
|
December 31,
2009
|
April 4,
2009
|
April 3,
2010
|
|||||||||||||||
(audited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Statement
of Operations Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$ | 215,752 | $ | 278,098 | $ | 68,665 | $ | 88,968 | ||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
35,433 | 40,748 | 8,721 | 12,689 | ||||||||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(6,701 | ) | (51,421 | ) | (4,283 | ) | (2,915 | ) | ||||||||||
Net
loss
|
(23,191 | ) | (65,605 | ) | (7,569 | ) | (8,440 | ) | ||||||||||
Net
loss allocable to common stockholders per share:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | (0.21 | ) | $ | (0.60 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | ||||||
Diluted
|
$ | (0.21 | ) | $ | (0.60 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | ||||||
Weighted
average number of shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
108,835 | 109,096 | 109,093 | 128,576 | ||||||||||||||
Diluted
|
108,835 | 109,096 | 109,093 | 128,576 | ||||||||||||||
- 7
-
April 3, 2010
|
||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||
Balance
Sheet Data:
|
(amounts in thousands)
|
|||||
Current
assets
|
$ | 72,819 | ||||
Total
assets
|
271,752 | |||||
Current
liabilities
|
94,223 | |||||
Long-term
debt, net of current portion
|
129,577 | |||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
31,883 | |||||
- 8
-
RISK
FACTORS
The
following “risk factors” contain important information about us and our business
and should be read in their entirety. Additional risks and uncertainties
not known to us or that we believe to be immaterial could also impair our
business. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business,
results of operations and financial condition could suffer significantly.
As a result, the market price of our common stock could decline and you could
lose all of your investment.
Risks
Related to Our Business
We
have had a history of losses.
We
experienced net losses of $23.2 million in 2008 and $65.6 million in 2009 and,
giving effect to the Merger, a pro forma loss of $77.1 million from continuing
operations in 2009. We cannot predict if we will ever achieve profitability, and
if we do, be able to sustain such profitability. Further, we may incur
significant losses in the future for a number of reasons, including due to the
other risks described in this prospectus, and we may encounter unforeseen
expenses, difficulties, complications and delays and other unknown events.
Accordingly, we may not be able to achieve profitability.
Our
substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial
health.
As of
August 4, 2010, we and our subsidiaries have total indebtedness of approximately
$169.9 million (not including intercompany indebtedness but including capital
leases).
Our
substantial indebtedness could have important consequences to our
stockholders. For example, it could:
|
·
|
require
us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to
payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of our
cash flow to fund acquisitions, working capital, capital expenditures,
research and development efforts and other general corporate
purposes;
|
|
·
|
increase
our vulnerability to and limit our flexibility in planning for, or
reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we
operate;
|
|
·
|
place
us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have
less debt;
|
|
·
|
limit
our ability to borrow additional funds;
and
|
|
·
|
could
make us more vulnerable to a general economic downturn than a company that
is less leveraged.
|
Additionally, the terms governing our debt
facilities limit our ability, among other things, to:
|
·
|
incur additional
indebtedness;
|
|
·
|
prepay
indebtedness;
|
|
·
|
sell assets, including
capital stock of restricted
subsidiaries;
|
|
·
|
agree to payment
restrictions affecting our restricted
subsidiaries;
|
|
·
|
consolidate, merge,
sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our
assets;
|
|
·
|
enter into transactions
with our affiliates;
|
·
|
incur
liens;
|
·
|
guarantee the
obligations or liabilities of others; and
|
·
|
designate any of our
subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries or form additional
subsidiaries that are unrestricted subsidiaries.
|
These facilities are secured
by a blanket security interest that covers substantially all of our assets. An
event of default with respect to these facilities could result in, among other
things, the acceleration and demand for payment of all the principal and
interest due and the foreclosure on the collateral. As a result of such a default
or action against collateral, we may be forced into bankruptcy, which may result
in a loss of your investment.
- 9
-
Competition
in the industries we serve could reduce our market share and impact operating
results.
We serve
markets that are highly competitive and fragmented and in which a large number
of multinational companies compete for large, national projects, and an even
greater number of small, local businesses compete for smaller, one-time
projects. Many of our competitors are well-established and have larger and
better developed networks and systems, longer-standing relationships with
customers and suppliers, greater name recognition and greater financial,
technical and marketing resources than we have. These competitors can often
subsidize competing services with revenues from other sources and may be able to
offer their services at lower prices. These or other competitors may also reduce
the prices of their services significantly or may offer backhaul connectivity
with other services, which could make their services more attractive to
customers. Competition may place downward pressure on contract prices and
profit margins. Intense competition is expected to continue in these
markets and, if we are unable to meet these competitive challenges, we could
lose market share to our competitors and experience an overall reduction in our
operating performance and financial results.
We
are vulnerable to the cyclical nature of the telecommunications industry and,
specifically, the capital expenditures of the major telecommunications
providers.
The
demand for our outsourced infrastructure services is dependent upon the
existence of projects with engineering, procurement, construction and management
needs. The wireless telecommunications market, which is one of the
industries in which we compete, is particularly cyclical in nature and
vulnerable to downturns in the telecommunications industry. During times
of economic slowdown, some of our customers reduce their capital
expenditures. Further, customers, primarily in our wired and wireless
communications subsidiaries, sometimes defer or cancel pending projects.
As a result, demand for our services may decline during periods of economic
downturns and could adversely affect our operations and financial
performance.
We
generate a substantial portion of our revenue from a limited number of customers
and, if our relationships with such customers were harmed, our business would
suffer.
During
the year ended December 31, 2009, our four largest customers, as a percentage of
total revenue, were DIRECTV (64%), Comcast (13%), Verizon Communications (8%)
and Rogers Cable (5%). During the three months ended April 3, 2010,
our four largest customers, as a percentage of total revenue, were DIRECTV
(47%), Comcast (13%), Verizon Communications (8%) and Clearwire Communications
(6%).
We
believe that a limited number of clients will continue to be the source of a
substantial portion of our revenue for the foreseeable future. A key
factor in maintaining relationships with such customers is performance on
individual contracts and the strength of our professional reputation. To
the extent that our performance does not meet client expectations, or our
reputation or relationships with one or more key customers are impaired due to
another reason, we may lose future business with such clients, and as a result,
our ability to generate income would be adversely impacted. In addition,
key customers could slow or stop spending on initiatives related to projects we
are performing for them, due to increased difficulty in the credit markets as a
result of the recent economic crisis or other reasons. Since many of our
customer contracts allow our customers to terminate the contract without cause,
our customers may terminate their contracts with us at will and materially
impair our operating results.
We
maintain a workforce based upon current and anticipated workloads. If we
do not receive future contract awards or if these awards are delayed, we may
incur significant costs in adjusting our workforce demands.
Our
estimates of future performance depend on, among other matters, whether and when
we will receive certain new contract awards. While our estimates are based
upon good faith judgment, they can be unreliable and may frequently change based
on newly available information. In the case of larger projects, where
timing is often uncertain, it is particularly difficult to project whether and
when we will receive a contract award. The uncertainty of contract award
timing can present difficulties in matching workforce size with contractual
needs. If an expected contract award is delayed or not received, we could
incur significant costs resulting from retaining more staff than is necessary or
redundancy of facilities. Similarly, if we underestimate the workforce
necessary for a contract, we may not perform at the level expected by the client
and harm our reputation with the client. Each of these may negatively
impact our operating performance and financial results.
We
recognize revenue for fixed price construction contracts using the
percentage-of-completion method; therefore, variations of actual results from
our assumptions may reduce our profitability.
We
recognize revenue and profit on our construction contracts as the work
progresses using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. Under
this method of accounting, contracts in progress are valued at cost plus accrued
profits less paid revenue and progress payments made on uncompleted
projects. This method relies on estimates of total expected contract
revenue and costs.
- 10
-
Contract
revenue and total cost estimates are reviewed and revised monthly by management
as the work progresses, such that adjustments to profit resulting from revisions
are made cumulative to the date of revision. Adjustments are reflected for
the fiscal period affected by such revisions. If estimates of costs to
complete long-term projects indicate a loss, we immediately recognize the full
amount of the estimated loss. Such adjustments and accrued losses may
negatively impact our operating
results.
If our customers
perform more tasks themselves, our business will
suffer.
Our success also depends
upon the continued trend by our customers to outsource their network design,
deployment and project management needs. If this trend does not continue or is
reversed and telecommunication service providers and network equipment vendors
elect to perform more of these tasks themselves, our operating results may be
adversely affected due to the decline in the demand for our
services.
We
have a lack of liquidity and will require additional capital to fund our
operations and obligations.
As of
July 30, 2010, we had cash balances and availability under existing credit
facilities of approximately $14.0 million. Because we are only minimally
capitalized, we expect to experience a lack of liquidity for the foreseeable
future in our proposed operations. We will adjust our expenses as necessary to
prevent cash flow or liquidity problems. We may need to raise additional funds
to continue to fund our operations and obligations as well as to fund potential
acquisitions. Our capital requirements will depend on several factors,
including:
|
·
|
our
ability to enter into new agreements with customers or to extend the terms
of our existing agreements with customers, and the terms of such
agreements;
|
|
·
|
the
success rate of our sales efforts;
|
|
·
|
costs
of recruiting and retaining qualified
personnel;
|
|
·
|
expenditures
and investments to implement our business strategy;
and
|
|
·
|
the
identification and successful completion of
acquisitions.
|
We may
seek additional funds through public and private securities offerings and/or
borrowings under lines of credit or other sources. Our inability to raise
adequate funds to support the growth of our business would materially adversely
affect our business. If we cannot raise additional capital, we may have to
implement one or more of the following remedies:
|
·
|
curtail
internal growth initiatives;
|
|
·
|
forgo
the pursuit of acquisitions; and/or
|
|
·
|
reduce
capital expenditures.
|
We do not
know whether additional financing will be available on commercially acceptable
terms when needed, if at all. If adequate funds are not available or are
not available on commercially acceptable terms, our ability to fund our
operations or otherwise respond to competitive pressures could be significantly
delayed or limited.
If we
raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, further dilution to our
stockholders could result, and new investors could have rights superior to those
of our existing stockholders. Any equity securities issued also may provide for
rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of holders of our common
stock. If we raise additional funds by issuing debt securities, these debt
securities would have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of
holders of our common stock, and the terms of the debt securities issued could
impose significant restrictions on our operations.
If
we experience material delays and/or defaults in customer payments, we may be
unable to cover all expenditures related to such customer’s
projects.
Because
of the nature of some of our contracts, we commit resources to projects prior to
receiving payments from our customers in amounts sufficient to cover
expenditures as they are incurred. Delays in customer payments may require
us to make a working capital investment or obtain advances from our line of
credit. If a customer defaults in making its payments on a project or
projects to which we have devoted significant resources, it could have a
material negative effect on our results of operations and negatively impact the
financial covenants with our lenders.
- 11
-
The
nature of our construction businesses exposes us to potential liability claims
and contract disputes that may negatively affect our results of
operations.
We engage
in construction activities, including engineering and oversight of engineering
firms. Design, construction or systems failures can result in substantial
injury or damage to third parties. Any liability in excess of insurance
limits at locations constructed by us could result in significant liability
claims against us, which claims may negatively affect our results of
operations. In addition, if there is a customer dispute regarding
performance of project services, the customer may decide to delay or withhold
payment to us. If we are ultimately unable to collect on these payments,
our results of operations would be negatively impacted.
We
may experience significant fluctuations in our quarterly results relating to our
ability to generate additional revenue and manage expenditures and other
factors, some of which are outside of our control, which could cause rapid
declines in our stock price.
Our
quarterly operating results have varied considerably in the past, and may
continue to do so, due to a number of factors. Many of these factors are
outside of our control and include, without limitation, the
following:
|
·
|
our
ability to attract new customers, retain existing customers and increase
sales to such customers;
|
|
·
|
the
commencement, progress, completion or termination of contracts during any
particular quarter;
|
|
·
|
the
cyclical nature of the telecommunications
industry;
|
|
·
|
the
cost of raw materials we require for our projects;
and
|
|
·
|
satellite,
cable and telecommunications market conditions and economic conditions
generally.
|
Due to
these factors and others, our results for a particular quarter, and therefore,
our combined results for the affected year, may not meet the expectations of
investors, which could cause the price of our common stock to decline
significantly.
Our
backlog is subject to reduction and potential cancellation.
Our
backlog consists of uncompleted portions of services to be performed under
job-specific contracts and the estimated value of future services that we expect
to provide under master service agreements and other long-term contracts.
Many of our contracts are multi-year agreements. We include in our backlog the
amount of services projected to be performed over the terms of the contracts,
where applicable, or based on our historical experience with customers and our
experience in procurements of this type. In many instances, our customers
are not contractually committed to procure specific volumes of services under a
contract. Our estimates of backlog and a customer’s requirements
during a particular future period may not prove to be accurate, particularly in
light of the turbulent current economic conditions. If our estimated
backlog is significantly inaccurate, this could adversely affect our financial
results and the price of our common stock.
The failure to successfully identify
or integrate acquisitions could
result in a reduction of
our
operating results, cash flows and liquidity.
We have made, and in the future may
continue to make, strategic acquisitions. Acquisitions may expose us to
operational challenges and risks, including:
|
·
|
the
ability to profitably manage additional businesses or successfully
integrate acquired business operations and financial reporting and
accounting control systems into our
business;
|
|
·
|
increased
indebtedness and contingent purchase price obligations associated with an
acquisition;
|
|
·
|
the
ability to fund cash flow shortages that may occur if anticipated revenue
is not realized or is delayed, whether by general economic or market
conditions, or unforeseen internal
difficulties;
|
|
·
|
the
availability of funding sufficient to meet increased capital needs;
and
|
|
·
|
diversion
of management’s attention.
|
- 12
-
We may not successfully identify
suitable acquisitions in the future, and in the event we do
commence such a transaction, the failure to successfully
consummate the
acquisition or manage the operational
challenges and risks associated with the acquisition following
the consummation could adversely
affect
our results of
operations, cash flows and liquidity.
If
we do not successfully integrate our business operations with those of Berliner,
our business will be adversely affected.
We will
need to successfully integrate our business operations with those of Berliner in
order to obtain the benefits we expect from the Merger. Integrating these
operations is a complex and time-consuming process. There may be substantial
difficulties, costs and delays involved in any integration of the businesses.
These may include:
|
·
|
distracting
management from day-to-day
operations;
|
|
·
|
potential
incompatibility of corporate
cultures;
|
|
·
|
an
inability to achieve synergies as
planned;
|
|
·
|
costs
and delays in implementing common systems and
procedures;
|
|
·
|
retaining
existing customers and attracting new
customers;
|
|
·
|
retaining
key employees;
|
|
·
|
identifying
and eliminating redundant and underperforming operations and
assets;
|
|
·
|
managing
tax costs or inefficiencies associated with integrating the operations of
the combined company; and
|
|
·
|
making
any necessary modifications to operating control standards to comply with
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder.
|
The
failure to integrate our business operations with those of Berliner successfully
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
We
may incur goodwill and other intangible impairment charges which could reduce
our profitability.
Pursuant
to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we are
required to annually assess our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles
to determine if they are impaired. In addition, interim reviews must be
performed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment
may have occurred. If the testing performed indicates that impairment has
occurred, we are required to record a non-cash impairment charge for the
difference between the carrying value of the goodwill or other intangible assets
and the implied fair value of the goodwill or other intangible assets in the
period the determination is made. Disruptions to our business, end market
conditions, protracted economic weakness and unexpected significant declines in
operating results may result in charges for goodwill and other asset
impairments. We assess the potential impairment of goodwill on an annual
basis, as well as when interim events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying value may not be recoverable. We assess definite-lived
intangible assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value may not be recoverable. We performed our required annual goodwill
impairment test as of October 3, 2009 and determined that the carrying value of
the telecommunications reporting unit exceeded its fair value and was therefore
impaired. We also completed an impairment test of our long-lived assets at
that date for the telecommunications reporting unit. The results of the
impairment testing caused us to recognize a non-cash asset impairment charge of
$38.4 million. Future impairments could further reduce our
profitability.
Legal proceedings and other
claims could reduce our profitability, cash flows
and liquidity.
We are subject to various claims,
lawsuits and proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business.
These actions may seek, among other things, compensation for alleged personal
injury, workers’ compensation, employment
discrimination, wage and hour disputes, breach of contract, property damage,
consequential and punitive damages, civil penalties, or injunctive or
declaratory relief. In addition, we generally
indemnify
our customers
for claims related to the services we provide. Claimants may seek
large damage awards. Defending these claims can involve significant legal
costs. When appropriate, we establish reserves against
litigation and claims that we believe to be adequate in
light of current information, legal advice and professional indemnity insurance
coverage, and we adjust such reserves from time to time according to
developments. If reserves are inadequate, insurance coverage proves to be
inadequate or unavailable, or there is an increase in liabilities for which
we self-insure, we could experience a reduction
in our profitability and liquidity. An adverse determination on any such
claim or lawsuit could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. Separately, claims and lawsuits
alleging wrongdoing or negligence by us may harm its reputation or
divert management resources away from operating our
business.
- 13
-
Government
regulations may adversely affect our business.
Our
customers are subject to various regulations of the FCC and other international
regulations. These regulations require that these networks meet certain radio
frequency emission standards and not cause interference to other services, and
in some cases accept interference from other services. FCC regulations
could cause our customers to slow down or delay development and deployment plans
for network build outs, which could impact our financial results.
We maintain a high-deductible
liability insurance program, which exposes us to a substantial portion of
the costs of claims and lawsuits.
Although we maintain insurance policies
with respect to automobile liability, general liability, workers’ compensation and employee
group health claims, those policies are subject to high deductibles.
Because most claims against us do not exceed the
deductibles under its insurance policies, we are effectively self-insured for
substantially all claims. We determine any liabilities for
unpaid claims and associated expenses, including incurred but not reported
losses, and reflect the present value of those liabilities in our balance sheet as other
current and non-current liabilities. The determination of such claims and
expenses and the appropriateness of the related liability is reviewed and
updated quarterly. However, insurance liabilities are difficult to assess and
estimate due to the many relevant factors, including the severity of an injury
or legitimacy of a claim and the determination of our liability in proportion to
other parties. If our insurance claims increase or
costs exceed our estimates of insurance
liabilities, we may experience a decline in
operating results and liquidity.
Increases in our insurance premiums or
collateral requirements could significantly reduce our profitability, liquidity and
availability under our credit
facilities.
Because of factors such as
increases in claims, projected significant increases in medical costs and wages,
lost compensation and reductions in coverage, insurance carriers may be
unwilling to continue to provide us with our current levels of
coverage without a significant increase in insurance premiums or collateral
requirements to cover our deductible obligations. An increase in premiums or
collateral requirements could significantly reduce our profitability and liquidity
as well as reduce availability under our credit facilities.
Our
operating results can be negatively affected by weather conditions.
We
perform most of our services outdoors. Adverse weather conditions may
affect productivity in performing services or may temporarily prevent us from
performing services for our customers. The affect of weather delays on
projects that are under fixed price arrangements may be greater if we are unable
to adjust the project schedule for such delays. A reduction in
productivity in any given period or our inability to meet guaranteed schedules
may adversely affect the profitability of our projects.
We
bear the risk of cost overruns in some of our contracts.
We
conduct our business under varying contractual arrangements, some of which are
long-term and generate recurring revenue at agreed upon pricing. Certain
of our contracts have prices that are established, in part, on cost and
scheduling estimates which are based on a number of assumptions, including,
without limitation, assumptions about future economic conditions, prices and
availability of labor, prices of equipment and materials and other
variables. These assumptions are made more difficult to ascertain by the
current uncertainty in the capital markets and the wide fluctuation in prices
for equipment, fuel and other costs associated with our services.
Specifically, we are affected by the cost of crude oil used for fuel.
Crude oil prices have historically been volatile. We do not enter into
hedge transactions to reduce our exposure to price risks and cannot assure you
that we will be successful in passing on these attendant costs if these risks
were to materialize. If cost assumptions prove inaccurate or circumstances
change, cost overruns may occur and, as a result, we may experience reduced
profits or, in some cases, a loss for those projects affected.
- 14
-
If
we are unable to recruit and retain key managers and employees, our business may
be adversely affected.
We depend
on the services of our executive officers and the senior management of our
subsidiaries. Our management team has an average of approximately 19 years
of experience in our industry; the loss of any of them could negatively affect
our ability to execute our business strategy. Although we have entered
into employment agreements with our executive officers and certain other key
employees, we cannot guarantee that any key management personnel will remain
employed by us. The loss of key management could adversely affect the management
of our operations.
In
addition, the services we deliver to our clients could be delayed or interrupted
if we are unable to attract, train and retain highly skilled employees,
particularly, installation technicians. Competition for these employees is
intense. Because of the complex and technical nature of some of our services,
any failure to attract and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees
could materially harm our business.
We
have in the past and may in the future experience deficiencies, including
material weaknesses, in internal control over financial reporting. Our business
and our share price may be adversely affected if we do not remediate these
material weaknesses or if we have other weaknesses in our internal
controls.
With
respect to fiscal year 2008, Holdings identified control deficiencies, including
a material weakness, in its internal control over financial reporting in which
unbilled accounts receivable and the related revenue were
misstated. Beginning in early 2009, we have remediated the material
weakness and improved the accounting system and internal processes. While we
have made efforts to improve our accounting policies and procedures, additional
deficiencies and weaknesses may be identified. If material weaknesses or
deficiencies in our internal controls exist and go undetected, our financial
statements could contain material misstatements that, when discovered in the
future, could cause us to fail to meet our future reporting obligations and
cause the price of our common stock to decline.
In
addition, in mid-2010, we identified a mathematical error within cash provided
from operations on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows of Holdings for the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009. As a result of the error, discontinued
operations amounts were inadvertently characterized as loss rather than
income. As a result of the discovery of the error, management has
taken steps to evaluate internal controls and has concluded their design is
appropriate. Management believes that future occurrences of mathematical errors
of this type or a similar type will be prevented as a result of proper execution
of existing controls.
Risks
Related to our Company and our Common Stock
Our
historic stock price has been volatile and purchasers of our common stock could
incur substantial losses.
Historically,
our stock price has been volatile. The stock market in general,
particularly recently, has experienced extreme volatility that has often been
unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. As a
result of this volatility, investors may not be able to sell our common stock at
or above their respective purchase prices. The market price for our common
stock may be influenced by many factors, including, but not limited to,
variations in our financial results or those of companies that are perceived to
be similar to us, investors’ perceptions of us, the number of our shares
available in the market, future sales of our common stock and securities
convertible into our common stock, and general economic, industry and market
conditions. In addition, in the past two years, the stock market has experienced
significant price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a
significant impact on the market price of securities issued by many companies,
including companies in our industry. The changes frequently appear to
occur without regard to the operating performance of the affected
companies. Hence, the price of our common stock could fluctuate based upon
factors that have little or nothing to do with our Company, and these
fluctuations could materially reduce our share price and cause you to lose all
or part of your investment. Further, in the past, market fluctuations and
price declines in a company’s stock have led to securities class action
litigations. If such a suit were to arise, it could have a substantial
cost and divert our resources regardless of the outcome.
There
is a lack of a public market for our shares, which limits our stockholders’
ability to sell their shares.
Our
common stock is currently quoted on the OTCBB, which is a decentralized market
regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority in which securities are
traded via an electronic quotation system that serves more than 3,000
companies. On the OTCBB, securities are traded by a network of brokers or
dealers who carry inventories of securities to facilitate the buy and sell
orders of investors, rather than providing the order matchmaking service seen in
specialist exchanges. Trading of our common stock on such exchange has
been light and sporadic.
- 15
-
Although
we are applying to have our common stock listed on the NASDAQ Global Market upon
the consummation of this offering, we can make no representation nor provide any
assurance that our common stock will be able to meet the initial listing
standards of this or any other stock exchange. If our common stock does
not become listed on the NASDAQ Global Market, the trading market for our common
stock may remain generally illiquid. Even if our common stock becomes listed on
the NASDAQ Global Market, we can provide no assurances that an active market for
our common stock will ever develop or that we will be able to maintain the
listing standards of the exchange.
A small number of existing
stockholders have the ability to
influence major corporate decisions.
Through their ownership of
our common stock
and Series B
Preferred, HM
Capital Partners, LLC, or HM LLC, and its affiliates
beneficially owned approximately 79% of the outstanding shares of
our common
stock as of
August 4,
2010.
Accordingly, they are in a position to influence:
|
·
|
the
vote of most matters submitted to our stockholders, including any
merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our
assets;
|
|
·
|
the
nomination of individuals to our board of directors;
and
|
|
·
|
a
change in our control.
|
The interests of HM LLC and its affiliates
could conflict
with yours. In addition, HM LLC or its affiliates may in the
future own businesses that directly compete with ours. These factors may
also discourage, delay or prevent
a takeover attempt that other stockholders might consider in their
best interest.
Our management will have broad
discretion over the use of the proceeds from this offering and might not apply
the proceeds of this offering in ways that increase the value of your
investment.
Our
management will have broad discretion to use the net proceeds from this
offering. We expect to use the net proceeds from this offering to reduce
indebtedness and fund working capital needs. We may fail to use these funds
effectively to yield a significant return, or any return, on any investment of
these net proceeds and we cannot assure you the proceeds will be used in a
manner which you would approve.
We do not intend to pay dividends for
the foreseeable future.
We have
never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not intend
to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We anticipate that we will
retain all of our future earnings for use in the development of our business and
for general corporate purposes. Any determination to pay dividends in the future
will be at the discretion of our board of directors. Accordingly, investors must
rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never
occur, as the only way to realize any future gains on their
investments.
You
will suffer immediate and substantial dilution.
The
public offering price per share of our common stock is substantially higher than
our net tangible book value per common share immediately after the
offering. As a result, you will pay a price per share that substantially
exceeds the book value of our assets after subtracting our liabilities. At
an assumed offering price of $ per share, you will
incur immediate and substantial dilution in the amount of
$ per share. We also have outstanding stock
options to purchase our common stock at a weighted average exercise price of
$2.30 per share and warrants to purchase our common stock at an average exercise
price of $1.50. To the extent these options and/or warrants are exercised,
there will be further dilution.
In
addition, in connection with our $35.0 million revolving credit facility with
BMO Capital Markets Financing, Inc., or BMO, Sector Performance Fund, LP and SPF
SBS LP, affiliates of HM LLC, have guaranteed our performance under the credit
facility in return for a fee. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions, Director Independence - Credit Support Agreement.” If either of
Sector Performance Fund, LP or SPF SBS LP is required to perform its obligations
under the guaranty, we would be obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts
to repay them the principal amount and related interest within nine months after
they performed under the guarantee. If we failed to do so, the principal
and interest owed to them would automatically convert into shares of Series B
Preferred at a valuation of $1.00 per share, which could result in additional
substantial dilution to you. See “Dilution.”
- 16
-
Provisions
of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law might
discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our Company or changes in
our management and, as a result, depress the trading price of our common
stock.
Our
Charter and our amended and restated bylaws, or Bylaws, contain provisions that
could discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our Company or changes
in our management that the stockholders of our Company may deem advantageous.
These provisions:
·
|
establish
a classified board of directors so that not all members of our board are
elected at one time;
|
·
|
require
prior approval by a special committee of our board of directors, or the
Special Committee, of any action which would amend or in any way modify
our Charter or Bylaws, among other
actions;
|
·
|
authorize
the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock that our board of directors
could issue to increase the number of outstanding shares and to discourage
a takeover attempt;
|
·
|
provide
that the board of directors is expressly authorized to adopt, or to alter
or repeal our bylaws; and
|
·
|
establish
advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our board of
directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders
at stockholder meetings.
|
In
addition, we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law,
or DGCL, which, subject to some exceptions, prohibits “business combinations”
between a Delaware corporation and an “interested stockholder,” which is
generally defined as a stockholder who becomes a beneficial owner of 15% or more
of a Delaware corporation’s voting stock, for a three-year period following the
date that the stockholder became an interested stockholder. Section 203 could
have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control that
our stockholders might consider to be in their best
interests.
These
anti-takeover defenses could discourage, delay or prevent a transaction
involving a change in control of our Company. These provisions could also
discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other
stockholders to elect directors of your choosing and cause us to take corporate
actions other than those you desire.
Future
sales of our common stock in the public market could lower our share price, and
any additional capital raised by us through the sale of equity or convertible
debt securities may dilute your ownership in us and may adversely affect the
market price of our common stock.
We and
substantially all of our stockholders may sell additional shares of common stock
in subsequent public offerings. We may also issue additional shares of common
stock or convertible debt securities to finance future acquisitions. After the
consummation of this offering, we will
have shares of common stock authorized
and shares
of common stock outstanding. The number outstanding
includes shares that we are
selling in this offering, which may be resold immediately in the public market.
Of the remaining
shares outstanding, ,
or % of our total outstanding shares,
are restricted from immediate resale under the lock-up agreements between our
current stockholders, directors and officers and the underwriter described in
“Underwriting,” but may be sold into the market in the near future. These shares
will become available for sale following the expiration of the lock-up
agreements, which, without the prior consent of the representatives of the
underwriter, is 180 days after the date of this prospectus, subject to
compliance with the applicable requirements under Rule 144 of the Securities Act
of 1933, or the Securities Act.
We cannot
predict the size of future issuances of our common stock or the effect, if any,
that future issuances and sales of our common stock will have on the market
price of our common stock. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock
(including shares issued in connection with an acquisition), or the perception
that such sales could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices for
our common stock.
- 17
-
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The
information included in this prospectus or incorporated by reference herein
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, or the Exchange Act, the attainment of which involves various risks
and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical fact
included in this prospectus are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as
“may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “continue” or
similar terms, variations of those terms or the negative of those
terms.
These
forward-looking statements are based on assumptions that we have made in light
of our experience in the industry in which we operate, as well as our
perceptions of historical trends, current conditions, expected future
developments and other factors we believe are appropriate under the
circumstances. As you read and consider this prospectus, you should understand
that these statements are not guarantees of performance or results. They involve
risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond our control) and assumptions.
Although we believe that these forward-looking statements are based on
reasonable assumptions, you should be aware that many factors could affect our
actual financial condition or results of operations and cause actual results to
differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements.
These factors include, among other things:
|
·
|
our
financial condition and strategic
direction;
|
|
·
|
our
future capital requirements and our ability to satisfy our capital
needs;
|
|
·
|
the
potential generation of future revenues and/or
earnings;
|
|
·
|
our
ability to adequately staff our service
offerings;
|
|
·
|
opportunities
for us from new and emerging technologies in our
industries;
|
|
·
|
our
ability to obtain additional
financing;
|
|
·
|
our
growth strategy;
|
|
·
|
trends
in the satellite, cable and telecommunications
industries;
|
|
·
|
key
drivers of change in our business, as identified in this
prospectus;
|
|
·
|
our
competitive position and the competitive landscape;
and
|
|
·
|
other
statements that contain words like “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect” and
similar expressions that are also used to identify forward-looking
statements.
|
It is
important to note that all of our forward-looking statements are subject to a
number of risks, assumptions and uncertainties, such as risks:
|
·
|
related
to a concentration in revenues from a small number of
customers;
|
|
·
|
associated
with the consolidation of our
customers;
|
|
·
|
associated
with competition in the satellite, cable and telecommunications
industries;
|
|
·
|
that
we will not be able to generate positive cash flow;
and
|
|
·
|
that
we may not be able to obtain additional
financing.
|
This list
is only an example of the risks that may affect the forward-looking statements.
If any of these risks or uncertainties materialize or fail to materialize, or if
the underlying assumptions are incorrect, then actual results may differ
materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.
Additional
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
reflected in the forward-looking statements include, without limitation, those
discussed elsewhere in this prospectus. It is important not to place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our analysis,
judgment, belief or expectation only as of the date of this prospectus. We
undertake no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to
reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date of this
prospectus.
- 18
-
USE
OF PROCEEDS
We
estimate that the net proceeds to us from this offering will be approximately
$ million, assuming a public offering price
of $ per share, the last reported sale price
for our common stock on 2010, as
reported by the OTCBB, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. If the underwriter’s
over-allotment option is exercised in full, we estimate that we will receive
additional net proceeds of approximately
$ million.
A $1.00
increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price would increase
(decrease) the net proceeds to us by
$ million, after deducting estimated
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable
by us, assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the
cover page of this prospectus, remains the same. An increase (decrease) of 1.0
million in the number of shares offered by us would increase (decrease) the net
proceeds to us by
$ million.
We intend
to use the net proceeds from the sale of shares by us to repay certain of our
indebtedness and the remainder for working capital and other general corporate
purposes. As of April 3, 2010, we had approximately $170.0 million
aggregate principal amount of debt outstanding, which matures between 2010 and
2013 and bears interest at a weighted average rate of 11%.
- 19
-
PRICE
RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
Our
common stock is currently quoted on the OTCBB. On July 6, 2010, our
trading symbol was changed from “BERL.OB” to “UGLB.OB” as part of our name
change from Berliner Communications, Inc. to UniTek Global Services, Inc. at
that time. Prior to September 16, 2005, our stock was traded under the
symbol “NVNW.OB.” Concurrently with the consummation of this
offering, we expect that our common stock will trade on the NASDAQ Global Market
under the symbol “UNTK.”
The
following table sets forth the high and low bid prices of our common stock on
the applicable market for the quarterly periods indicated. Such prices
reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commission, and
may not necessarily represent actual transactions:
Quarter Ended
|
Low
|
High
|
||||||
October
2, 2010 (through August 12, 2010)
|
$ |
0.55
|
$ |
1.20
|
||||
July
3, 2010
|
1.00
|
1.45
|
||||||
April
3, 2010
|
0.55
|
|
1.25
|
|||||
December
31, 2009
|
0.60
|
|
0.70
|
|||||
September
30, 2009
|
0.51
|
|
0.70
|
|||||
June
30, 2009
|
0.51
|
0.60
|
||||||
March
31, 2009
|
0.51
|
0.85
|
||||||
December
31, 2008
|
0.60
|
1.55
|
||||||
September
30, 2008
|
1.06
|
1.30
|
||||||
June
30, 2008
|
1.06
|
1.41
|
||||||
March
31, 2008
|
1.05
|
2.00
|
||||||
December
31, 2007
|
1.01
|
1.20
|
||||||
September
30, 2007
|
1.01
|
1.10
|
Our stock
has experienced periods, including extended periods, of limited or sporadic
quotations.
As of
August 2, 2010, there were 147 holders of record of our common
stock.
DIVIDEND
POLICY
We have
not declared or paid any dividend since inception on our common stock. We do not
anticipate that we will declare or pay dividends in the foreseeable future on
our common stock.
- 20
-
CAPITALIZATION
The
following table describes our cash and cash equivalents and capitalization as of
April 3, 2010:
·
|
on
an actual basis;
|
·
|
on
a pro forma basis to give to (i)
one-for- reverse split of
our outstanding common stock to be effected prior to the completion of
this offering and (ii) the conversion of all of our outstanding Series B
Preferred into shares
of common stock upon the completion of this offering at an assumed
conversion price of $ per share, which
represents a 6.5% discount to the assumed public offering price of
$ ;
and
|
·
|
on
an pro forma as adjusted basis to reflect (i) our sale
of shares of common stock in this
offering at an assumed offering price of
$ per share, and (ii) the application
of proceeds from this offering to repay $ million of our outstanding
indebtedness.
|
You
should read this capitalization table together with the consolidated financial
statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus, as well as
“Use of Proceeds,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations” and the other financial information included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
As of April 3, 2010
(unaudited)
|
|||||||||
Actual
|
Pro Forma(1)
|
Pro Forma
As Adjusted (2)
|
|||||||
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
|
|||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 414 | |||||||
First
Lien Credit Agreement:
|
|||||||||
Revolving
Credit Facility
|
14,500 | ||||||||
Term
B Credit Facility
|
72,917 | ||||||||
Term
C Credit Facility
|
19,500 | ||||||||
106,917 | |||||||||
Second
Lien Credit Agreement:
|
|||||||||
Term
facility
|
25,000 | ||||||||
Holdings
revolving facility
|
29,485 | ||||||||
Capital lease obligations | 8,533 | ||||||||
Total
debt
|
169,935 | ||||||||
Stockholders’ equity (deficit) | |||||||||
Series
B Convertible Preferred Stock – par value $0.00002 per share, 2,000,000
shares authorized, 250,005 shares issued and outstanding, actual(3);
$0.00002 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and
outstanding, pro forma; $0.00002 par value, 2,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued and outstanding, pro forma as
adjusted;
|
12,500 | ||||||||
Series
A Convertible Preferred Stock – par value $0.00002 per share, 2,000,000
shares authorized, 1,317,602 shares issued and outstanding, actual(4);
$0.00002 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and
outstanding, pro forma; $0.00002 par value, 2,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued and outstanding, pro forma as
adjusted;
|
- |
-
|
-
|
||||||
Common
Stock – par value $0.00002 per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized(5),
70,523,330 shares issued and outstanding, actual;
$0.00002 par value, 200,000,000 shares
authorized,
shares issued and outstanding, pro forma; $0.00002
par value, 200,000,000 shares
authorized, shares
issued and outstanding, pro forma as adjusted;
|
2 | ||||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
134,581 | ||||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
124 | ||||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(102,824 | ) | |||||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
31,883 | ||||||||
Total
capitalization
|
$ | 214,318 |
(1) A
$1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price of
$ per share, would increase (decrease) each of cash
and cash equivalents, common stock, paid in additional capital, total
stockholders’ equity and total capitalization by
$ million, assuming that the number of shares
offered by us, as set forth on the cover cash and cash equivalents of this
prospectus, remains the same. An increase (decrease) of 1.0 million in the
number of shares offered by us would increase (decrease) each of cash and cash
equivalents, common stock, paid in additional capital, total stockholders’
equity and total capitalization by
$ million.
- 21
-
(2) A
$1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price of
$ per share, would increase (decrease) each of cash
and cash equivalents, common stock, total stockholders’ equity and total
capitalization by $ million, assuming that the
number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus, remains the same. An increase (decrease) of 1.0 million in the
number of shares offered by us would increase (decrease) each of cash and cash
equivalents, common stock, total stockholders’ equity and total capitalization
by $ million.
The
number of shares of our common stock outstanding immediately after this offering
is based on 136,778,330 shares outstanding as of August 4, 2010 and
excludes:
|
·
|
18,095,434
shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options
at a weighted average exercise price of $2.30 per
share;
|
|
·
|
8,703,572
shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants at a
weighted average exercise price of $1.50 per share;
and
|
|
·
|
the
shares reserved for issuance under our 2009 Omnibus Equity and Incentive
Compensation Plan, under which we are entitled to grant a number of shares
equal to 10% of the issued and outstanding shares of common
stock.
|
(3)
Series B Preferred Liquidation value of $25.6 million as of April 3, 2010,
includes $0.3 million of accrued credit support fees payable quarterly in either
cash or additional shares of Series B Preferred, which has a two times
liquidation preference, at our option. The credit support fee is
equal to 6% (or the maximum contract rate of interest permitted by law if less
than 6%) on the aggregate of the outstanding principal and accrued interest of
the BMO Revolving Facility. This fee is payable to HM LP pursuant to
the Credit and Support Agreement. The Series B Preferred has an
optional conversion feature to our common stock, such that the actual conversion
ratio would be 50 shares of our common stock for each share of Series B
Preferred, subject to standard anti-dilution adjustments for stock splits,
dividends and similar events.
(4) The
holders of the Series A Preferred have the same rights as holders of our common
stock. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock was automatically
converted into 50 shares of our common stock upon the filing and effectiveness
of an amendment to our Charter on June 4, 2010.
(5) Our
Charter was amended on June 4, 2010 to increase the number of authorized shares
of common stock to 200,000,000.
- 22
-
DILUTION
If you
invest in our common stock, your interest will be diluted to the extent of the
difference between the public offering price per share and the net tangible book
value per share after this offering.
As of
April 3, 2010, our historical net tangible book value was approximately $(125.2)
million, or $(0.92) per share. Net tangible book value per share
represents total tangible assets less total liabilities, divided by the number
of shares of common stock outstanding. After giving effect to (i) the
conversion of all outstanding shares of our Series B Preferred in
to shares of our common stock, our pro
forma net tangible book value was approximately
$ million, or $ per
share, and (ii) the issuance and sale
of shares of common stock in this
offering at an assumed public offering price of
$ per share, and deducting the underwriting
discounts and estimated offering expenses that we will pay, our pro forma as
adjusted net tangible book value as of April 3, 2010 would have been
approximately $ million, or
$ per share. This represents an
immediate increase in net tangible book value of
$ per share to existing stockholders and an
immediate dilution of $ per share to new
investors purchasing common stock in this offering. The following table
illustrates this dilution on a per share basis:
Per Share
|
||||||||
Assumed
public offering price per share
|
$ | |||||||
Historical
net tangible book value per share as of April 3, 2010
|
$ | (0.92 | ) | |||||
Pro
forma increase in net tangible book value per share attributable to
conversion of preferred stock
|
||||||||
Pro
forma net tangible book value per share as of April 3,
2010
|
$ | |||||||
Increase
in pro forma net tangible book value per share attributable to this
offering
|
||||||||
Pro
forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after this
offering
|
||||||||
Dilution
per share to new investors
|
$ |
A $1.00
increase (decrease) in the assumed offering price of
$ per share, would affect our as adjusted net
tangible book value after this offering by
$ million, the net tangible book value per share
after this offering by $ per share, and the
dilution per common share to new investors as adjusted by
$ per share, assuming the number of shares offered
by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and
after deducting the commissions and discounts and estimated offering expenses
payable by us. An increase (decrease) of 1.0 million in the number of shares
offered by us would affect our as adjusted net tangible book value after this
offering by $ million, the net tangible book value
per share after this offering by $ per share,
and the dilution per common share to new investors as adjusted by
$ per share.
The
following table sets forth, on a pro forma, as adjusted basis, as of April 3,
2010, the total number of shares of common stock owned by existing stockholders
and to be owned by new investors, the total consideration paid, and the average
price per share paid by our existing stockholders and to be paid by new
investors purchasing shares of common stock in this offering. The
calculation below is based on an assumed public offering price of
$ per share before deducting the underwriting
discounts and estimated offering expenses that we will pay, and gives effect to
the conversion of all outstanding shares of our Series B Preferred
into shares of our common
stock.
Average
|
|||||||||||||||
Shares
Purchased
|
Total
Consideration
|
Price
Per
|
|||||||||||||
Number
|
Percent
|
Amount
|
Percent
|
Share
|
|||||||||||
Existing
stockholders
|
% | $ | % | $ | |||||||||||
New
investors
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
|
% | $ | % | $ |
- 23
-
A $1.00
increase (decrease) in the assumed offering price of
$ per share would increase (decrease) total
consideration paid by new investors, total consideration paid by all
stockholders and average price per share paid by all stockholders by
$ million, $ million and
$ per share, respectively. An increase (decrease)
of 1.0 million in the number of shares offered by us would increase (decrease)
total consideration paid by new investors, total consideration paid by all
stockholders and average price per share paid by all stockholders by
$ million,
$ million and
$ per share.
If the
underwriter exercises in full its option to purchase additional shares of our
common stock in the offering, the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value
per share would be $ per share and the dilution to
new investors in this offering would be $ per
share.
The table
above excludes, as of April 3, 2010:
|
·
|
18,136,953
shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options
at a weighted average exercise price of $9.15 per
share;
|
|
·
|
5,703,572
shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants at a
weighted average exercise price of $2.28 per share;
and
|
|
·
|
the
shares reserved for issuance under our 2009 Omnibus Equity and Incentive
Compensation Plan, under which we are entitled to grant a number of shares
equal to 10% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock as
determined by us to calculate fully diluted earnings per share for the
fiscal year preceding the date of
determination.
|
If all of
these options and warrants had been exercised on April 3, 2010, our pro forma
net tangible book value would have been approximately
$ million, or
$ per share, and the dilution on a pro forma
as adjusted net tangible book value basis to new investors would have been
$ per share.
In
addition, in connection with our $35.0 million revolving credit facility with
BMO, Sector Performance Fund, LP and SPF SBS LP, affiliates of HM LLC, have
guaranteed our performance under the credit facility in return for a fee. See
“Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions, Director Independence -
Credit Support Agreement.” If either of Sector Performance Fund, LP or SPF SBS
LP is required to perform its obligations under the guaranty, we would be
obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to repay them the principal
amount and related interest within nine months after they performed under the
guarantee. If we failed to do so, the principal and interest owed to
them would automatically convert into shares of Series B Preferred at a
valuation of $1.00 per share, which could result in additional substantial
dilution to you.
- 24
-
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
We have
derived the consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2009 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2008 and 2009 from our audited consolidated financial
statements, which are included elsewhere in this prospectus. We have derived the
summary consolidated statement of operations data for the three months ended
April 4, 2009 and April 3, 2010 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of
April 3, 2010 from our unaudited consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited information was prepared on a basis
consistent with that used in preparing our audited consolidated financial
statements and includes all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
adjustments, which are necessary for a fair presentation of our financial
position, results of operations and cash flows for the unaudited
periods. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected in any future period and should be read in conjunction
with “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations,” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Year Ended December 31,
|
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
2008
|
2009
|
April 4, 2009
|
April 3, 2010
|
|||||||||||||
(audited)
|
(unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
|
(amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
|||||||||||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Operations Data:
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$ | 215,752 | $ | 278,098 | $ | 68,665 | $ | 88,968 | ||||||||
Cost
of revenue
|
180,319 | 237,350 | 59,944 | 76,279 | ||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
35,433 | 40,748 | 8,721 | 12,689 | ||||||||||||
Selling,
general, and administrative expenses
|
20,864 | 26,860 | 6,731 | 9,032 | ||||||||||||
Asset
impairment
|
– | 38,431 | – | – | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
21,270 | 26,878 | 6,273 | 6,572 | ||||||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(6,701 | ) | (51,421 | ) | (4,283 | ) | (2,915 | ) | ||||||||
Interest
income
|
82 | – | – | – | ||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
16,096 | 18,825 | 3,965 | 5,172 | ||||||||||||
Other
expense, net
|
7 | 284 | – | – | ||||||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations before income taxes
|
(22,722 | ) | (70,530 | ) | (8,248 | ) | (8,087 | ) | ||||||||
Benefit
(provision) for income taxes
|
(4,503 | ) | 4,743 | (379 | ) | (69 | ) | |||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(27,225 | ) | (65,787 | ) | (8,627 | ) | (8,156 | ) | ||||||||
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations (net of tax benefit of
$453, $0, $0, and $0, respectively)
|
4,034 | 182 | 1,058 | (284 | ) | |||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (23,191 | ) | $ | (65,606 | ) | $ | (7,569 | ) | $ | (8,440 | ) | ||||
Net
loss per share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | (0.21 | ) | $ | (0.60 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | ||||
Diluted
|
$ | (0.21 | ) | $ | (0.60 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | ||||
Weighted
average number of shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
108,835 | 109,096 | 109,093 | 128,576 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
|
108,835 | 109,096 | 109,093 | 128,576 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA (1) | — | 19,718 | — | 5,496 |
- 25
-
|
December 31,
|
|
||||||||||
|
2008
|
2009
|
April 3, 2010
|
|||||||||
(audited)
|
(unaudited)
|
|||||||||||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets Data:
|
(amounts
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 5,348 | $ | 2,263 | $ | 414 | ||||||
Working
capital
|
(145,177 | ) | (41,715 | ) | (21,404 | ) | ||||||
Total
assets
|
282,015 | 231,841 | 271,752 | |||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
191,201 | 80,921 | 94,223 | |||||||||
Long
term debt, less current portion
|
1,314 | 131,406 | 132,931 | |||||||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
82,999 | 19,513 | 31,883 |
____________
(1) See “Adjusted EBITDA.”
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
The following unaudited
pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the historical consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto of Berliner included in its Transition Report on Form 10-K for the six
months ended December 31, 2009, filed on March 31, 2010, as well as the
historical consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Holdings and
the unaudited pro forma combined financial statements in our Current Report on
Form 8-K/A filed April 12, 2010 and our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
August 13, 2010 incorporated by reference herein. The pro forma financial
information below shows summary unaudited pro forma combined financial
information as if Berliner and Holdings had been combined as of January 1,
2010.
The
unaudited pro forma financial information is for illustrative purposes only and
is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have been
realized if the acquisition had been completed on the dates indicated, nor is it
indicative of our future operating results. The unaudited pro forma adjustments
are based upon available information and certain assumptions that we believe are
reasonable. You should not rely on the unaudited pro forma income statement for
the three months ended April 3, 2010, as being indicative of the results of
operations that would have been achieved had the business combination been
consummated as of January 1, 2009.
- 26
-
Three
Months Ended April 3, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
Historical
|
||||||||||||||||
UniTek
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
|
Berliner
|
|||||||||||||||
Months
|
January
1
|
|||||||||||||||
Ended
April
|
though
27,
|
Pro
Forma
|
Pro
Forma
|
|||||||||||||
3,
2010
|
2010
|
Adjustments
|
Combined
|
|||||||||||||
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 88,968 | $ | 6,401 |
|
$ | - |
|
$ | 95,369 | ||||||
Costs
of revenues
|
76,279 | 5,321 |
|
1,258 | (a) | 82,858 | ||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
12,689 | 1,080 | (1,258 | ) | 12,511 | |||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
9,032 | 3,049 |
|
(1,258 | )(a) | 8,208 | ||||||||||
(2,615 | )(b) | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
6,572 | 109 |
|
125 | (c) | 6,806 | ||||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(2,915 | ) | (2,078 | ) | 2,490 | (2,503 | ) | |||||||||
Interest
expense
|
5,172 | 30 |
|
143 |
(d)
|
5,454 | ||||||||||
|
32 |
(e)
|
||||||||||||||
|
77 |
(f)
|
||||||||||||||
Amortization
of deferred financing costs
|
77 |
|
(77 | )(f) | - | |||||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations before income taxes
|
(8,087 | ) | (2,185 | ) | 2,315 | (7,957 | ) | |||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
(69 | ) | - | (69 | ) | |||||||||||
Income (loss)
from continuing operations
|
$ | (8,156 | ) | $ | (2,185 | ) | $ | 2,315 | $ | (8,026 | ) | |||||
Loss
from continuing operations per common share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | ||||||||||
Diluted
|
$ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | ||||||||||
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
128,576 | 135,616 | ||||||||||||||
Diluted
|
128,576 | 135,616 |
- 27
-
Statement
of Operations Adjustments
(a)
|
Reclassification
of Berliner SG&A costs to conform with our historical accounting
policy
|
(b)
|
Reflects
elimination of transaction costs related to the Merger incurred in Q1
Statement of Operations by both the Company and
Berliner
|
(c)
|
Reflects
preliminary estimated amortization for one month of identifiable
intangible assets from the purchase of Berliner. Customer relationships
are estimated to be amortized over seven years, backlog is estimated to be
amortized over one year and covenants not to compete are estimated to be
amortized over 3.4 years
|
(d)
|
Incremental
interest expense from the credit support fee for one month required under
the Credit Support Agreement entered into with HM Capital as part of the
Merger for the guaranty of the Holdings Revolving Credit
Facility. The fee is estimated at 6% of the balance at December
31, 2009.
|
(e)
|
Amortization
of deferred financing costs for one month related to financing costs
associated with amendment required under UniTek First Lien and Second Lien
Credit Facilities
|
(f)
|
Reclassification
of deferred financing costs as interest expense to conform with our
historical accounting policy
|
ADJUSTED
EBITDA
Earnings
Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization, or EBITDA, as adjusted in
accordance with the table below, is a key indicator used by our management to
evaluate operating performance of our company and to make decisions regarding
compensation and other operational matters. While this adjusted EBITDA is not
intended to replace any presentation included in these consolidated financial
statements under generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, and should
not be considered an alternative to operating performance or an alternative to
cash flow as a measure of liquidity, we believe this measure is useful to
investors in assessing our performance in comparison with other companies in our
industry. This calculation may differ in method of calculation from similarly
titled measures used by other companies. We
compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and
using Adjusted EBITDA only as supplemental information. Adjusted pro
forma EBITDA is our EBITDA adding back transaction costs for the Merger and
including the results of Berliner and other acquisitions as if they had occurred
at the beginning of the period being presented.
A
reconciliation of adjusted pro forma EBITDA to net loss is as follows for the
year ended December 31, 2009 and for the three months ended April 3, 2010
(amounts in thousands):
Year
Ended
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
December
31, 2009
|
April
3, 2010
|
|||||||||||||||
Actual
|
Pro
Forma
|
Actual
|
Pro
Forma
|
|||||||||||||
Adjusted
EBITDA reconciliation:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (65,605 | ) | $ | (76,910 | ) | $ | (8,440 | ) | $ | (10,924 | ) | ||||
(Income)
loss from discontinued operations
|
(181 | ) | (181 | ) | 284 | 284 | ||||||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
(4,743 | ) | (3,046 | ) | 69 | 69 | ||||||||||
Interest,
net
|
18,825 | 21,268 | 5,172 | 5,454 | ||||||||||||
Asset
impairment
|
38,431 | 38,431 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
26,878 | 29,673 | 6,572 | 6,806 | ||||||||||||
Other
expense, non cash
|
284 | 246 | - | - | ||||||||||||
EBITDA
from continuing operations
|
13,889 | 9,481 | 3,657 | 1,689 | ||||||||||||
Stock
compensation expense
|
1,688 | 2,089 | 399 | 424 | ||||||||||||
Legacy
legal reserve (1)
|
1,883 | 1,883 | - | |||||||||||||
Pro
forma EBITDA from market swap (2)
|
1,093 | 1,093 | - | |||||||||||||
Merger
transaction costs
|
1,165 | 1,977 | 1,440 | 2,615 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted
EBITDA
|
$ | 19,718 | $ | 16,523 | $ | 5,496 | $ | 4,728 |
____________
(1) Represents an adjustment to reserves for historical legal claims
existing prior to 2009.
(2) This
adjustment reflects the EBITDA impact for the fulfillment sites received from
DIRECTV as part of the market swap had the transaction been completed on January
1, 2009. For more information see Note 4 to the attached Holdings
Consolidated Financial Statements.
- 28
-
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The
following discussion contains forward-looking statements which are subject to
known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our
actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. We discuss such risks, uncertainties and other
factors throughout this prospectus and specifically under the caption “Risk
Factors.” The following review should be read in connection with our
consolidated financial statements and the related notes that are set forth under
the heading “Prospectus Summary—Consolidated Summary Financial Data,” elsewhere
in this prospectus and our audited consolidated financial statements and related
notes for the year ended December 31, 2009 and our unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements both included in our Current Report on
Form 8-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April
12, 2010 and our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 13, 2010. All financial information and data from
the first quarter of fiscal 2010, ended April 3, 2010, is
unaudited.
Basis
of Presentation
We are a
leading full-service provider of permanently outsourced infrastructure services,
offering an end-to-end suite of technical services to the wireless and wireline
telecommunications, satellite television and broadband cable industries in the
United States and Canada. Our services include network engineering
and design, construction and project management, comprehensive installation and
fulfillment, and wireless telecommunication infrastructure
services. Our primary client base consists of blue-chip, Fortune 200
companies in the media and telecommunications industry, including such customers
as DIRECTV, AT&T, Clearwire Communications, Ericsson, Sprint, T-Mobile,
Comcast, Cox Communications, Verizon Communications, Charter Communications and
Time Warner Cable. We also serve significant Canadian customers, such
as Rogers Cable and Cogeco Cable. Our clients rely on our services to
build and maintain their infrastructure and networks, and provide residential
and commercial fulfillment services, which are critical to our clients’ ability
to deliver voice, video and data services to their end users. The
majority of our services are performed under long-term master
agreements.
On
January 27, 2010, Berliner, BCI East and Holdings entered into the Merger
Agreement, pursuant to which BCI East merged with and into Holdings and Holdings
became a wholly owned subsidiary of Berliner. On June 4, 2010,
Berliner filed a charter amendment and changed its name to UniTek Global
Services, Inc., or UniTek.
As a
result of the Merger, Holdings was the accounting acquirer with Berliner (now
UniTek) as the legal acquirer and registrant. Upon the completion of
the Merger, Berliner changed its fiscal year end from June 30 to December
31. Berliner filed a Transition Report for the six month period ended
December 31, 2009, on Form 10-K with the SEC on March 31, 2010, or the
Transition Report. As the accounting acquirer, Holdings’ prior year
results are presented for comparison purposes. The results for the
quarter ending April 3, 2010 are Holdings for the entire period and the combined
entity after consummation of the Merger on January 27, 2010, referred to herein
as the Effective Time. The results for the quarter ended April 4,
2009 and the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are the results
of Holdings. For the results of Berliner for the six months ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and the years ended June 30, 2009 and
June 30, 2008, please see the Transition Report. We currently operate
in two reportable segments: (1) Fulfillment and (2) Engineering and
Construction.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Major assets and liabilities that are subject to estimates include allowance for
doubtful accounts, goodwill and other acquired intangible assets, deferred tax
assets and certain accrued and contingent liabilities.
Summary
of Operating Results
The
following table presents consolidated selected financial information. The
statement of operations data for the three months ended April 3, 2010, and April
4, 2009, have been derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements
that, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments, necessary to state fairly the data for such
period.
- 29
-
All
amounts presented below are expressed in thousands, except per-share data,
unless otherwise noted.
Three Months Ended
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||
April 3, 2010
|
April 4, 2009
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Statement
of Operations Data:
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$ | 88,968 | $ | 68,665 | $ | 278,098 | $ | 215,752 | ||||||||
Gross
profit
|
12,689 | 8,721 | 40,748 | 35,433 | ||||||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(2,915 | ) | (4,283 | ) | (51,421 | ) | (6,701 | ) | ||||||||
Net
loss
|
(8,440 | ) | (7,569 | ) | (65,605 | ) | (23,191 | ) | ||||||||
Net
loss per share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.60 | ) | $ | (0.21 | ) | ||||
Diluted
|
$ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.60 | ) | $ | (0.21 | ) | ||||
Weighted
average number of shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
128,576 | 109,093 | 109,096 | 108,835 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
|
128,576 | 109,093 | 109,096 | 108,835 |
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
April 3, 2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
Balance
Sheet Data:
|
||||||||||||
Current
assets
|
$ | 72,819 | $ | 39,206 | $ | 46,024 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
271,752 | 231,841 | 282,015 | |||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
94,223 | 80,921 | 191,201 | |||||||||
Long
term debt, net of current portion
|
132,931 | 131,406 | 1,314 | |||||||||
Stockholders’
equity
|
31,883 | 19,513 | 82,999 |
THREE
MONTHS ENDED APRIL 3, 2010, COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 4,
2009
Revenue
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
(amounts in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
April 3, 2010
|
April 4, 2009
|
Increase
|
||||||||||
Fulfillment
|
$ | 61,570 | $ | 58,290 | $ | 3,280 | ||||||
Engineering
and Construction
|
27,398 | 10,375 | 17,023 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 88,968 | $ | 68,665 | $ | 20,303 |
We had
revenue of $89.0 million for the three months ended April 3, 2010, compared
to $68.7 million for the three months ended April 4, 2009. This
represents an increase of $20.3 million, or 30%. Of the revenue gain, $17.1
million reflects the operations of Berliner which have been included in our
consolidated results since the Effective Time and is included in the engineering
and construction segment.
Revenue
for the fulfillment segment increased $3.3 million from $58.3 million, or 6% for
the three months ended April 3, 2010 as compared to the three months ended April
4, 2009. Revenue from the broadband cable acquisitions we completed in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 accounted for $4.4 million in additional revenue
and the full quarter impact of the 2009 DIRECTV market swap added $2.8
million. These gains were partially offset by weather issues in the
first quarter of fiscal 2010 in the Northeast and Midwest portions of the United
States and lower customer promotions in the first quarter of 2010 as compared to
2009. We estimate the impact of these items was approximately $4.0
million.
- 30
-
Revenue
for the engineering and construction segment increased $17.0 million from $10.4
million, or 164%, for the three months ended April 3, 2010 as compared to the
three months ended April 4, 2009. The increase is related to the
operations of Berliner which have been included in our consolidated results
since the Effective Time.
Cost
of Revenue
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
(amounts in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
April 3, 2010
|
April 4, 2009
|
Increase
|
||||||||||
Fulfillment
|
$ | 51,427 | $ | 49,828 | $ | 1,599 | ||||||
Engineering
and Construction
|
24,852 | 10,116 | 14,736 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 76,279 | $ | 59,944 | $ | 16,335 |
Our cost
of revenue was $76.3 million and $59.9 million for the three months ended
April 3, 2010 and April 4, 2009, respectively. This represents an
increase of $16.3 million, or 27%. Of the cost of revenue increase, $15.3
million is related to the operations of Berliner which have been included in our
consolidated results since the Effective Time and is included in the cost of
revenue for the engineering and construction segment. Cost of revenue
was 86% and 87% of total revenue for the three months ended April 3, 2010 and
April 4, 2009, respectively.
Cost of
revenue for the fulfillment segment increased $1.6 million from $49.8 million
for the three months ended April 4, 2009 to $51.4 million for the three months
ended April 3, 2010. While cost of revenue increased in dollars, cost of revenue
decreased as a percentage of revenue, which we believe reflects operational
improvements made in the fulfillment segment.
Cost of
revenue for the engineering and construction segment increased $14.7 million
from $10.1 million for the three months ended April 4, 2009 to $24.8 million for
the three months ended April 3, 2010. The increase is primarily
related to the operations of Berliner which have been included in our
consolidated results since the Effective Time.
Gross
Profit
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
(amounts in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
April 3, 2010
|
April 4, 2009
|
Increase
|
||||||||||
Fulfillment
|
$ | 10,143 | $ | 8,462 | $ | 1,681 | ||||||
Engineering
and Construction
|
2,546 | 259 | 2,287 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 12,689 | $ | 8,721 | $ | 3,968 |
Our gross
profit for the three months ended April 3, 2010 was $12.7 million compared to
$8.7 million for the three months ended April 4, 2009. This
represents an increase of $4.0 million, or 46%. Of the gross profit
increase, $1.8 million is from the operations of Berliner which have been
included in our consolidated results since the Effective Time and is included in
the engineering and construction segment. Our gross profit as a
percentage of revenue was approximately 14% for the three months ended April 3,
2010, as compared to 13% for the three months ended April 4, 2009.
For the
fulfillment segment, gross margin increased from 15% for the three months
ended April 4, 2009 to 16% for the three months ended April 3,
2010. The increase is primarily related to the operational
improvements in various fulfillment markets, overall
profitability improvements from use of field technology and dispatch cost
reduction programs.
- 31
-
For the
engineering and construction segment, gross margin increased from 2% to
9%. The increase is primarily attributed to a combination of
operating efficiencies and the introduction of the higher margin wireless
business.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
Selling,
general and administrative expenses, or SG&A, for the three months ended
April 3, 2010 were $9.0 million as compared to $6.7 million for the three months
ended April 4, 2009. This represents an overall increase of $2.3 million.
Approximately $1.7 million of the increase is attributable to the results of
operations of Berliner, which has been included in our consolidated results
since the Effective Time. Approximately $1.4 million in SG&A cost
is primarily integration and transaction expenses related to the Merger incurred
in the period ended April 3, 2010, offset by lower costs in the SG&A of our
core business.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Depreciation
on fixed assets totaled approximately $2.7 million for the three months ended
April 3, 2010 compared to $0.8 million for the three months ended April 4,
2009. The increase in depreciation is attributed to $0.2 million of
depreciation costs related to the Merger and depreciation from the 2009
conversion of a portion of our fleet from operating leases to capital
leases.
Amortization
of intangible assets acquired as a result of acquisitions resulted in
amortization expense of approximately $3.9 million for the three months ended
April 3, 2010 compared to $5.5 million for the three months ended April 4,
2009. The decrease is related to the asset impairment of the wired
telecommunications reporting unit in 2009 that resulted in a write-down of the
customer contracts in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.
Interest
Expense
We
recognized $5.2 million and $4.0 million in interest expense during the three
months ended April 3, 2010 and April 4, 2009, respectively. The
increase of $1.2 million was primarily due to the higher debt levels in the
first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009, an increase in
interest rates from the 2009 amendments to the debt agreements and the guaranty
fee on the BMO Revolving Facility entered into during January 2010.
Income
Taxes
We
recorded income tax expense of $0.1 and $0.4 million for three months ended
April 3, 2010 and April 4, 2009, respectively. The 2010 tax expense
represents the estimated tax expense from our Canadian
operations. The 2009 tax expense is due to differences between book
and tax amortization of intangible assets.
At April
3, 2010, we had net operating loss carry forwards for federal and state income
tax purposes of approximately $33.0 million which begin to expire in 2014
and will fully expire by 2029. Because the Company has not yet
achieved profitable operations, management believes the potential tax benefits
from the deferred tax assets do not satisfy the realization criteria set forth
in Federal Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards
Codification Topic 740, and accordingly, has recorded a valuation allowance of
the entire net deferred tax asset.
YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
Below is
a summary of revenue and gross profit for the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008:
Revenue
Year Ended December 31,
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
||||||||||
(amounts in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Fulfillment
|
$ | 238,656 | $ | 148,464 | $ | 90,192 | ||||||
Engineering
and Construction
|
39,442 | 67,288 | (27,846 | ) | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 278,098 | $ | 215,752 | $ | 62,346 |
- 32
-
We had
revenue of $278.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, versus $215.8 million for the prior year ended December
31, 2008. This represents an increase of $62.3 million, or 29%
year-over-year.
Revenue
for the fulfillment segment increased $90.2 million from $148.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008 to $238.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2009 or 61%. There were three acquisitions of cable television sites
that contributed growth of $4.2 million and the 2008 acquisition/swap of 180
Connect, net of the 2009 market swap with DIRECTV, contributed additional
satellite and broadband fulfillment revenue of approximately $51.3
million. Internal revenue growth in the fulfillment segment was
approximately $34.7 million (23%), which was primarily related to winning
business in new markets from existing satellite and broadband
customers.
Revenue
for the engineering and construction segment decreased $27.8 million from $67.3
million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $39.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The full year impact in 2009 of the 2008
telecommunications acquisitions was approximately $14.4 million in additional
revenue. Offsetting these increases was a reduction in spending by
one of our telecommunications customers, primarily a result of the completion of
our customers’ deployment plan in certain markets. We believe the
impact on our telecommunications revenue from this matter was a reduction of
approximately $43.8 million in 2009 as compared to 2008. The
balance of the revenue change was normal changes in customer
spending.
Cost
of Revenue
Year Ended December 31,
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
||||||||||
(amounts in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Fulfillment
|
$ | 200,326 | $ | 123,423 | $ | 76,903 | ||||||
Engineering
and Construction
|
37,024 | 56,896 | (19,872 | ) | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 237,350 | $ | 180,319 | $ | 57,031 |
Our cost
of revenue was $237.4 million and $180.3
million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Cost of revenue represents an increase of $57.0
million, or 32%. These amounts represent 85% and 84% of total revenue for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Cost of
revenue for the fulfillment segment increased $76.9 million from $123.4 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $200.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009. This represents an increase of 62% during a period
when revenue increased 61%.
Cost of
revenue for the engineering and construction segment decreased $19.9 million
from $56.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $37.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009. This represents a decrease of 35%
during a period when revenue decreased 41%. The difference reflects
the impact of fixed site costs that could not be impacted fast enough in the
period.
Gross
Profit
Year Ended December 31,
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
||||||||||
(amounts in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Fulfillment
|
$ | 38,330 | $ | 25,041 | $ | 13,289 | ||||||
Engineering
and Construction
|
2,418 | 10,392 | (7,974 | ) | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 40,748 | $ | 35,433 | $ | 5,315 |
Our gross
profit for the year ended December 31, 2009 increased 15% to $40.7 million as
compared to $35.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008. Our gross profit as a percentage of revenue
was approximately 15% for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 16%
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
- 33
-
For the
fulfillment segment, gross profit decreased from 17% for the year ended December
31, 2008 to 16% for the year ended December 31, 2009 primarily reflecting the
costs incurred in starting up new cable fulfillment operations.
For the
engineering and construction segment, gross profit decreased from 15% for the
year ended December 31, 2008 to 6% for the year ended December 31, 2009
reflecting the impact of the unexpected revenue decline from one of our
telecommunications customers.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
SG&A
expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 were $26.9 million as compared to
$20.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. This represents an overall
increase of $6.0 million or 29%. SG&A expenses included non-cash charges for
stock compensation expenses of $1.7 million and $1.3 million for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The
increase in SG&A expense primarily reflects the added cost to support the
revenue growth from $215.8 million in 2008 to $278.1 million in 2009, as well as
the full year effect of certain administrative staff additions, transaction and
integration costs associated with the 2008 acquisitions completed by
us. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A expense was constant at 9%
of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 9% in 2009 when excluding
the non-cash stock compensation costs.
Asset
Impairment
We
performed our required annual goodwill impairment test as of October 3, 2009 and
determined that the carrying value of the telecommunications reporting unit
exceeded its fair value and was therefore impaired. We also completed
an impairment test of our long-lived assets at that date. The results
of the impairment testing caused us to recognize a non-cash asset impairment
charge of $38.4 million.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Depreciation
expense, including amortization of assets under capital leases, was
approximately $6.8 million and $4.2 million for the years ended December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively.
Amortization
of intangible assets acquired as a result of acquisitions resulted in
amortization expense of approximately $20.7 million and $19.6 million for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Amortization of
customer contracts and employee non-compete agreements are being amortized over
a useful life of 15 to 60 months on a straight line basis.
Interest
Expense
We
recognized $18.8 million in net interest expense during the year ended December
31, 2009 as compared to $16.0 million for the year ended December 31,
2008. The increase of $2.8 million was primarily due to the higher
debt level from the 2008 and 2009 acquisitions and higher interest rate
resulting from 2009 amendments to the debt agreements.
We
recognized $2.2 million and $1.7 million in amortization of deferred financing
fees for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively for fees
incurred from the original issuance and subsequent amendments to existing debt
agreements.
Income
Taxes
We
recorded an income tax benefit of $4.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2009 and an income tax expense of $4.0 million for the year ended December 31,
2008. The effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2009 was
7%. The tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2009 is created
primarily by the asset impairment. Overall, Holdings had
approximately $33.4 million of deferred tax assets as of December 31,
2009 that were offset by a valuation allowance as the Company has not yet
achieved profitable operations to utilize the deferred tax assets.
- 34
-
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At April
3, 2010, we had consolidated current assets of approximately $72.8 million,
including cash and cash equivalents of approximately $0.4
million. Historically, we have funded our operations primarily
through operating cash flow and borrowings under loan arrangements. The
principal use of cash during the three months ended April 3, 2010 was to pay
costs associated with consummating the Merger.
We
believe that our cash, cash equivalents and net proceeds from this offering will
be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements for at least the next 12
months. If our available cash and cash equivalents are insufficient to satisfy
our liquidity requirements, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt
securities or obtain an additional credit facility. The sale of additional
equity and debt securities may result in additional dilution to our
stockholders. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of debt
securities or preferred stock, these securities could have rights senior to
those of our common stock and could contain covenants that would restrict our
operations. We may require additional capital beyond our currently forecast
amounts. Any such required additional capital may not be available on reasonable
terms, if at all. If we are unable to obtain additional financing, we may be
required to reduce the scope of, delay or eliminate some or all of our planned
development and operations, which could harm our business.
Below is
a summary of our debt agreements that is relevant to an understanding of our
liquidity and capital resources:
First
Lien Credit Agreement and Second Lien Credit Agreement
General
On
September 27, 2007, UniTek Acquisition, Inc., or Acquisition, entered into (1) a
First Lien Credit Agreement, by and among Acquisition, UniTek Midco, Inc., or
Midco, certain subsidiaries of Acquisition as guarantors, the initial lenders,
Royal Bank of Canada, as administrative agent and collateral agent for the
lenders and RBC Capital Markets, as lead arranger and book-runner, or the First
Lien Credit Agreement, and (2) a Second Lien Term Loan Agreement, by and among
Acquisition, Midco, certain subsidiaries of Acquisition as guarantors, the
initial lenders, Royal Bank of Canada, as administrative agent and collateral
agent for the lenders and RBC Capital Markets, as lead arranger and book-runner,
or the Second Lien Credit Facility.
Availability
and Term
The
credit facilities provided for under the First Lien Credit Agreement are
(1) a First Lien Term B Credit Facility, or the Term B Credit Facility,
(2) a First Lien Term C Credit Facility, or the Term C Credit Facility, and
(3) a First Lien Revolving Credit Facility, or the Revolving Credit
Facility, with a portion of such Revolving Credit Facility available as a swing
line facility and a portion available as a letter of credit
facility. The Term B Credit Facility and the Revolving Credit
Facility, including the swing line loan facility and the letter of credit
facility, mature on September 27, 2012. The Term C Credit Facility
matures on the earlier of (1) three months after the maturity date of the
Term B Credit Facility and (2) December 31, 2013. As of April 3,
2010, the Term B Credit Facility and the Term C Credit Facility are fully drawn
at $93.0 million, and approximately $14.5 million of principal is outstanding
under the Revolving Credit Facility.
The
credit facility under the Second Lien Credit Facility is a $25.0
million second lien term loan facility. As of April 3, 2010, the
Second Lien Credit Facility is fully drawn. The Second Lien Credit
Facility matures on the earlier of (1) three months after the maturity date
of the Term B Credit Facility and (2) December 31, 2013.
- 35
-
Interest
Rate and Fees
The Term
B Credit Facility currently bears interest at a rate per annum equal to 5.5% for
base rate advances and 6.5% of Eurodollar advances (subject to 2.50% floor)
provided that the applicable margin shall be increased for each period in which
the leverage ratio is greater than 3.00:1.00 to 6.25% per annum for base rate
advances and 7.25% per annum for Eurodollar rate advances (subject to 2.5%
floor). The Term C Credit Facility currently bears interest at a rate
of 16.50% on $8 million of the debt and 13.08% on the remaining $11.5 million of
the debt. The Second Lien Credit Facility currently bears interest at
a rate per annum equal to the greater of (1) 15.75% and (2) the
Eurodollar rate plus a margin of 7.25%. The Revolving Credit Facility
interest rate margin is 5.0% for base rate advances and 6% of Eurodollar
advances (subject to 2.50% floor) provided that the applicable margin for the
Revolving Credit Facility shall be increased for periods in which the Leverage
Ratio is greater than 3.00:1.00 to 5.75% per annum for base rate advances and
6.75% per annum for Eurodollar rate advances (subject to 2.50%
floor).
Guaranties
and Security
The
obligations under the First Lien Credit Agreement are guaranteed by Midco and
certain subsidiaries of Midco, or the Guarantors, and are secured by a first
priority lien on substantially all of our assets and property and those of the
Guarantors, including a pledge of all equity interests in Acquisition and the
Guarantors, other than Midco.
The
obligations under the Second Lien Credit Facility are guaranteed by the
Guarantors and are secured by a second priority lien on substantially all of our
assets and property and those of the Guarantors, including a pledge of all
equity interests in Acquisition and the Guarantors, other than
Midco.
The First
Lien Credit Agreement and the Second Lien Credit Facility contain
representations and warranties and affirmative and negative covenants that are
customary for debt facilities of this type. In addition, the First
Lien Credit Agreement contains certain financial covenants, including, among
other things, a maximum total leverage ratio, a maximum first lien leverage
ratio, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, a minimum interest coverage ratio
and minimum liquidity requirements. The Second Lien Credit Facility
also contains total leverage ratio, maximum fixed charge coverage ratio and
minimum interest coverage ratio covenants, although in some cases the covenants
contained in the First Lien Credit Agreement are more restrictive.
The First
Lien Credit Agreement and the Second Lien Credit Facility also include events of
default that are customary for debt facilities of this type, subject to
significant threshold amounts and cure periods. These events of
default include, among other things, payment defaults, breaches of
representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults to certain
indebtedness and bankruptcy.
Expansion
of First Lien Credit Agreement
On July
16, 2010, we amended our existing Term B Credit Facility to provide a Third
Incremental Term B Facility of up to $20.0 million. Upon closing of
the amendment, $15.0 million of the facility was made available to us. The
additional $5.0 million of the facility shall be available to us as early as
November upon the achievement of certain EBITDA levels and covenant compliance
as defined in the amendment. The proceeds were used to reduce the
existing balance on the Revolving Credit Facility to support future working
capital needs. The Third Incremental Term B Facility currently bears
interest at the same rate as the prior Term B Credit
Facility. Pursuant to the terms of the amendment, the lenders under
the Third Incremental Term B Facility received warrants to purchase an aggregate
of 3,000,000 shares of our common stock. The warrants have an
exercise price of $0.01 per share, vested 25% upon issuance, and the remaining
warrants vest ratably through September 1, 2012. The warrants contain
a cashless exercise provision and provide for anti-dilution adjustments in the
case of reclassifications, consolidations, mergers or sales that impact our
common stock.
Letter
of Credit Transaction
On March
31, 2010, we entered into a Senior Secured Letter of Credit Facility
arrangement, or the LOC Facility, via an amendment to the First Lien Credit
Agreement, or the Amendment, by and among Acquisition, Midco, certain
subsidiaries of Acquisition as guarantors, the initial lenders under the LOC
Facility, and Royal Bank of Canada, as administrative agent and collateral agent
for the lenders. The Amendment establishes the “Incremental Tranche”
added to the credit facilities established by the First Lien Credit
Agreement. The full amount of the Incremental Tranche is solely
available to Acquisition for the issuance of letters of credit in support of
Acquisition’s obligations under certain insurance policies and other general
corporate purposes. The LOC Facility charges a 1.3333% per month cash
fee payable on issued but unfunded letters of credit and a 1.0% per annum cash
fee on the daily average unfunded amount of the LOC Facility. Funded
letters of credit will carry an interest rate of LIBOR plus 6.75% per annum with
a 2.5% LIBOR floor. As of April 3, 2010, there were $6.0 million in
letters of credit issued under the LOC Facility.
Loan
Authorization Agreement
Availability
and Term
In
September 2007, Holdings entered into the Loan Authorization Agreement with
BMO. The Loan Authorization Agreement established the BMO Revolving
Facility and is evidenced by a demand note. The BMO Revolving
Facility is payable and matures on demand of BMO. As of April 3, 2010,
approximately $25.0 million of principal plus approximately $4.5 million in
interest (calculated at a per annum rate of 7.25%) is outstanding under the BMO
Revolving Facility. The lender under the BMO Revolving Facility has
the right to terminate the BMO Revolving Facility at any time upon
demand.
- 36
-
Guaranties
The
obligations under the Loan Authorization Agreement are guaranteed severally, but
not jointly, by Sector Performance Fund and SPF, who are affiliates of HM
LLC.
The net
cash flows for the Company for the three months ended April 3, 2010 and April 4,
2009 are as follows:
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||
(amounts in thousands)
|
||||||||
April 3, 2010
|
April 4, 2009
|
|||||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
$ | (4,690 | ) | $ | 384 | |||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(527 | ) | (584 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
3,393 | (2,138 | ) |
Cash
(used in) provided by operating activities.
Net cash
used in operating activities in the three months ended April 3, 2010 was
approximately $4.7 million and net cash provided by operating activities was
$0.4 million in the three months ended April 4, 2009. During
the three months ended April 3, 2010, cash flow used in operating activities
primarily resulted from our operating income, net of non-cash charges, of
approximately $0.4 million, which represents an increase of $0.3 million
compared to the three months ended April 4, 2009. Accounts receivable increased
by approximately $5.2 million due to increased revenue during the three
months ended April 3, 2010.
In the
three months ended April 4, 2009, cash provided by operating activities
primarily resulted from the results of discontinued operations. For
the period ended April 4, 2009, working capital increased by approximately $1.2
million which was primarily from an increase in accounts
receivable.
Cash
used in investing activities.
Net cash
used in investing activities was approximately $0.5 million and $0.6 million in
the three months ended April 3, 2010 and April 4, 2009,
respectively. Cash used for the purchase of fixed assets was $0.6
million and $0.5 million for the three months ended April 3, 2010 and April 4,
2009, respectively.
Cash
provided by (used in) financing activities.
Net cash
provided by financing activities was approximately $3.4 million in the three
months ended April 3, 2010 as compared to cash used in financing activities of
$2.1 million in the three months ended April 4, 2009. During the
three months ended April 3, 2010, net cash provided by financing activities
consisted primarily of $12.5 million from issuance of preferred stock
contributions and $0.4 million from issuance of common stock. As part of the
Merger, existing Berliner debt of $7.2 million was paid, net of cash
acquired, and $2.6 million was paid on the Term B Credit
Facility.
- 37
-
During
the three months ended April 4, 2009, net cash used in financing activities
consisted primarily of repayment of revolver and long-term debt of $1.9 million.
In addition, payments on capital leases were $1.5 million and $0.3 million for
the period ended April 3, 2010 and April 4, 2009, respectively.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We
provide letters of credit to secure our obligations primarily related to our
insurance arrangements. Total letters of credit issued as of April 3,
2010 was $6.0 million. All outstanding letters of credit were issued
under the LOC Facility.
Effect
of Inflation
We do not
believe that our businesses are impacted by inflation to a significantly
different extent than the general economy. However, there can be no
assurance that inflation will not have a material effect on the operations in
the future.
Our
ability to satisfy our current obligations is dependent upon our cash on hand,
borrowings under our credit facilities, and the operations of our subsidiaries.
Our current obligations consist primarily of capital expenditures, debt service
and funding working capital. In the event we are not able to generate positive
cash flow in the future, or if we incur unanticipated expenses for operations
and are unable to acquire additional capital or financing, we will likely have
to reassess our strategic direction, make significant changes to our business
operations and substantially reduce our expenses until such time as we achieve
positive cash flow. The cancellation and/or deferral of a number of projects
from our largest customers may have a material impact on our ability to generate
sufficient cash flow in future periods.
- 38
-
BUSINESS
Overview
We are a
leading full-service provider of permanently outsourced infrastructure services,
offering an end-to-end suite of technical services to the wireless and wireline
telecommunications, satellite television and broadband cable industries in the
United States and Canada. Our services include:
|
·
|
network
engineering and design;
|
|
·
|
construction
and project management;
|
|
·
|
comprehensive
installation and fulfillment; and
|
|
·
|
wireless
telecommunication infrastructure
services.
|
Our
clients, which are primarily large telecommunications, satellite television and
cable companies, utilize our services to build and maintain their infrastructure
and networks, and to provide residential and commercial fulfillment
services. These services are critical to our clients’ ability to
deliver voice, video and data services to their end users. The
majority of our services are performed under long-term master
agreements.
Our
operating philosophy promotes a culture of visibility and accountability and is
focused on achieving efficiencies and surpassing each customer’s performance
standards. All of our operating subsidiaries utilize our shared services
platform, which consists of accounting, administrative, fleet management,
insurance, safety, legal and corporate resources at our corporate headquarters.
We have developed a standardized set of technology enabled, real-time monitoring
and reporting capabilities, which we refer to as PROS. We rely on
PROS to provide detailed, real-time reports on various performance
metrics. We believe this enables management to respond rapidly to
optimize operational performance. By maintaining a centralized,
technology-enabled shared services function, we believe we can better manage our
business, control costs, and apply universal financial and operational controls
and procedures. Our shared services platform has been engineered to be
highly scalable, and we believe that it can support a large increase in business
without significant modifications.
Our
strategy has enabled us to grow and scale our business units across a
diversified set of customers, geographies and end markets by executing to the
highest performance standards. We intend to leverage our outstanding
performance, commitment to technology and shared service platform to grow our
revenue and profitability.
As of
August 4, 2010, our operations included approximately 102 field offices and a
workforce of approximately 5,200, of whom approximately 3,100 are full-time
employees.
- 39
-
We report
our results in two segments: Fulfillment and Engineering &
Construction. These reportable segments are based on the services we
provide and the industries we serve. Our Fulfillment segment
primarily serves the satellite television and cable industries, where we provide
outsourced installation, upgrade and network management services. Revenues of
the Fulfillment segment are typically recurring in nature and are primarily
billed based on predetermined rates for each service performed. Our
Engineering & Construction segment primarily serves the wireless and
wireline telecommunications industries, where we provide engineering, design,
construction and project management services. Revenues of our
Engineering & Construction segment are generated under master service
agreements and other contracts which are billed based on a combination of
percent-of-completion, milestone achievement or predetermined rates for each
service performed.
For the
fiscal years 2008 and 2009, we had revenues of $215.8 million and $278.1
million, respectively, representing growth of 28.9%. For the three
months ended April 4, 2009 and April 3, 2010, we had revenues of $68.7 million
and $89.0 million, respectively, representing growth of 29.5%. As of
July 3, 2010, our three-year backlog was approximately $735 million,
approximately 23% of which we expect to realize in the last six months of
2010.
On
January 27, 2010, we consummated the Merger Agreement with Holdings pursuant to
which our subsidiary merged with and into UniTek and UniTek became our wholly
owned subsidiary. On June 4, 2010, we changed our corporate
name from Berliner Communications, Inc. to UniTek Global Services, Inc.
Pro forma for the Merger, our fiscal 2009 revenues were $347.5
million.
Industry
We
operate in the permanently outsourced infrastructure services industry,
assisting national and international customers in the communications sector. Our
customers are generally large corporations in the wireless and wireline
telecommunications, satellite television and broadband cable industries in North
America. The wireless, wireline, cable and satellite television
industries have continually outsourced a significant portion of their
fulfillment, engineering, construction and maintenance requirements in order to
reduce their investment in capital equipment, provide flexibility in workforce
sizing and focus on their core competencies, thereby creating a large market for
permanently outsourced infrastructure service providers.
- 40
-
We
believe the following industry trends will increase the size of the permanently
outsourced infrastructure services industry:
Faster Technology Upgrade
Cycles. The evolution of technology has become more rapid,
creating demand for increasingly faster and more robust voice, video and data
services. To support these next generation services, communication
service providers have been investing a significant amount of capital to
increase the capacity and performance of their data networks. In
addition, new technologies such as Long-Term Evolution and Worldwide
Interoperability for Microwave Access are being developed to support
increasingly data-intensive mobile devices. At the same time, major
regional and rural telecommunication companies are upgrading their networks from
copper line to fiber optic line in order to enhance their ability to provide
customers with bundled services that include video, voice and data. Similarly,
cable and satellite television companies have been introducing new technologies,
such as high-definition television, digital video recorders and video-on-demand,
all of which require enhanced data transfer capabilities. Providers
of these services have historically outsourced the design, construction and
maintenance of their networks to third parties in order to minimize their fixed
costs and number of employees. As these providers roll-out new
technologies and capabilities, we believe the demand for permanently outsourced
infrastructure services will increase.
In
addition, state and local governments have started to push for technology
upgrades and enhanced services. In February 2009, the ARRA was
passed, and local governments, municipalities and others have begun receiving
funds for construction activities, many of which are directly related to our
areas of expertise, such as the engineering and construction of communications
networks. More than $7.0 billion of the funds to be issued under the
ARRA are earmarked to build broadband facilities throughout the United
States. As of May 2010, $2.3 billion had already been awarded to
states to underwrite nearly 200 broadband projects across the
country.
Wireless Telecommunications Industry
Trends. Use of wireless telecommunications has grown rapidly, driven by
the dramatic increase in wireless telephone usage, along with strong demand for
wireless internet and other data services. In the United States, CTIA
estimates that as of December 2009 there were 285.6 million wireless subscriber
connections, using 2.3 trillion annualized minutes. The opportunity
for growth is significant, with the telecommunications industry constantly
releasing upgrades and new products. According to CTIA, the number of cell sites
has increased from approximately 180,000 in 2005 to approximately 250,000 in
2009. Furthermore, CTIA estimated wireless carriers invested more
than $20.0 billion upgrading their operations and expanding their networks’
coverage in 2009. The Telecommunication Industry Association
forecasts the number of cell sites to increase to 438,000 in 2013. These network
upgrades require increased construction, maintenance and repair services, a
substantial portion of which will be provided by permanently outsourced
infrastructure service providers.
In
addition, the FCC has issued and we expect it will continue to issue licenses
that grant access to new wireless spectrums to new and existing wireless service
providers. To support these new licenses, the recipients are often
required to develop and build new wireless networks. A recent example
of this is LightSquared, a company funded by Harbinger Capital to develop a
state-of-the-art 4G open wireless broadband network. In July 2010,
LightSquared announced that it had partnered with Nokia Siemens Networks for
network design, equipment manufacturing and installation and network operations
and maintenance services in an agreement worth approximately $7.0 billion over
eight years. We believe that a significant portion of the services to
be provided under this, and similar agreements, will be outsourced to
permanently outsourced infrastructure service providers.
Satellite Industry Trends.
According to the Satellite Broadcasting & Communications Association, as of
December 2009, there were approximately 32.7 million satellite television
subscribers compared to 30.6 million as of December 2007. In total,
the U.S. satellite television market, comprised of DIRECTV and DISH Network,
spent $2.4 billion in capital expenditures in 2009 determined by the companies’
annual reports. Based on public filings of these two carriers, there were
approximately 14.3 million gross subscriber additions and 12.2 million
subscriber disconnections in the past two years, resulting in a net increase of
2.1 million subscribers. Additionally, satellite providers spend a
significant portion of their retention marketing budgets on subscriber upgrade
initiatives, which rely on our outsourced services. As digital video providers
in the satellite, cable and telecommunications industries increase their
competition for subscribers, we believe the number of gross subscriber additions
and disconnections will continue to increase, increasing the demand for our
services.
- 41
-
Cable Industry
Trends. The NCTA estimates there were approximately 62.1
million cable subscribers in the United States in 2009, compared to 66.6 million
in 2000. Over the same time period, however, residential cable video
revenues have increased from $32.5 billion to $53.0 billion. Cable
providers have been able to increase revenues despite a declining subscriber
base by increasing higher-end services, such as high-definition video, digital
video recorders, video-on-demand, high speed data and telephony. All
of these new services require higher capacity networks, which has driven
increased capital expenditures. In fact, the NCTA estimates that
between 2000 and 2009, the cable industry spent over $131.0 billion on
infrastructure investments. In addition, as a result of these new
technologies evolving more rapidly, cable providers’ infrastructure investments
have been increasing, with $14.4 billion being invested in 2009 compared to
$10.1 billion being invested in 2004. A significant portion of these
investments represent permanently outsourced infrastructure services, such as
design, construction, maintenance and repair services.
Continued Convergence of
Services. Over the past several years, there has been
increased convergence of services driven by the proliferation of 3G networks and
the beginning roll-out of 4G networks. The communications industry is
facing rising demand for current and future services. Providers are
reporting that data traffic, including Web access, video messaging and other
services, has begun to outpace voice traffic. The Cisco Visual
Networking Index: Global Mobile Data Forecast Update notes that the average
smartphone user generates 10 times the amount of traffic generated by the
average non-smartphone user. Furthermore, Cisco estimates that mobile
data traffic will increase 39 times between 2009 and 2014. In order
to support all these data services, there is, and will continue to be, a need to
increase the backhaul capacity. Backhaul refers to the transfer of
voice, video or data from a site, such as a cellular tower, to the network
backbone, which is the primary network supporting the internet and other
communications. As the number of wireless and other remote
communication sites continues to grow rapidly, the need for constructing robust
backhaul capabilities will grow. Backhaul traffic can flow over
microwave, fiber, cable, or other technologies, and our broad expertise in
installing and designing effective backhaul delivery methods in all available
technologies is a significant resource for our customers and a competitive
advantage for us. Based on public filings, AT&T and Verizon spent
approximately $20 billion on wireline capital expenditures in 2009, and
according to Infonetics Research, mobile backhaul spending rose 21% to $7.2
billion in 2009 and is expected to rise 44% by 2014 to $10.4
billion. The demand for backhaul links will continue to increase with
the convergence of services. In addition, we believe that downstream
demand from other communications providers, such as internet service providers,
satellite operators and telecommunication resellers, who utilize backhaul
infrastructure to provide their services, will continue to
increase. As demand for these services increase, communication
companies will need to invest capital to improve their networks to accommodate
the demand for increased capacity, which will in turn increase the demand for
permanently outsourced infrastructure services.
Services
UniTek is
a leading, full service provider of permanently outsourced infrastructure
services. We deliver a broad range of specialized services to our
customers, including network engineering and design, construction and project
management, installation and fulfillment, and wireless
services.
Network Engineering and
Design. We are a provider of engineering and design services
to the industries we serve for underground plant construction, aerial
infrastructure and multi-dwelling content delivery. We have a suite
of network permit, design and engineering operations that facilitate the
construction of fiber cable placement and splicing from the user’s premises
through to the service providers distribution center. We also work
with municipalities to expedite the engineering and permitting processes,
supporting our industry leading delivery of installation and construction
services.
Construction and Project Management.
We are a full-service provider to the cable and wireline
telecommunication industries of project management and construction services,
including systems engineering, aerial and underground construction and project
management. We offer 24-hours-a-day, 7-days-a-week and
365-days-a-year maintenance and upgrade support to our customers. Our
comprehensive service offerings include the regular maintenance of our
customers’ distribution facilities and networks as well as emergency services
for accidents or storm damage. Our upgrade work ranges from routine
replacements and upgrades to major network overhauls.
- 42
-
Installation and Fulfillment
Services. We are a full-service provider of residential and
commercial installation services to the satellite television, and broadband
cable industries. We provide regional fulfillment services including
warehousing/logistics, call centers, inventory management, customer service
compliance, fleet management and risk and safety competencies. UniTek
has developed innovative, leading-edge technologies and processes to help manage
the daily operations and improve upon existing work processes. In
many of our markets, we are the exclusive provider of customer installation,
upgrade and disconnect services. In addition, the majority of our
installation and fulfillment services are performed under long-term master
agreements which are typically highly predictable and recurring in
nature.
Wireless Telecommunications
Infrastructure Services. We provide outsourced project
management, construction and infrastructure services to wireless
telecommunication companies nationwide. Our core activities include
communications infrastructure equipment construction and installation, radio
frequency and network design and engineering, radio transmission base station
installation and modification, and in-building network design, engineering and
construction. Additionally, we provide site acquisition services
where we act as an intermediary between our clients and property owners and
facilitate the wireless site preparation process from selection through
construction. In order to build and expand networks,
telecommunications companies require locations that have direct access to
highways and roads to mount their antennae and equipment. We identify
appropriate properties, negotiate the transactions and handle the administrative
details facilitating the eventual construction or augmentation of a wireless
communication equipment site. Our accumulated knowledge and relationships assist
in the planning and installation of the telecommunication facilities while
expediting the acquisition of necessary permits, entitlements and approvals that
are required by various municipalities.
Competitive
Strengths
Our
competitive strength is based on our focus on operational excellence in the
field, which is driven by our shared services platform and our commitment to
technology.
Operational Execution. Our
operating philosophy promotes a culture of visibility and accountability focused
on achieving efficiencies and surpassing each customer’s performance
standards. In an industry where substantial operational complexity
exists, including thousands of daily service visits, millions of dollars of
equipment procured and installed every month, and over ten thousand calls daily
into call centers, our operational approach, including PROS, has allowed us to
achieve what we believe is superior operating performance. Combined
with our shared services platform, PROS enhances our operational execution by
creating real-time accountability through the rapid detection and correction of
operational issues that could potentially impact performance, productivity and
profitability. Our solution provides management and field personnel
instantaneous operating and financial reports focused on “event management”
parameters and metrics that promulgate prompt, corrective actions. In comparison
to industry standards, in which infrequent and minimally analyzed reviews and
reports are common, we capitalize on our shared services model and PROS
technology to ensure frequent, regular and meticulously reviewed reports which
result in cost minimization, increased worker productivity and efficient
business practices. Our performance-oriented culture is further
enhanced by our management development program at UniTek University and our
adaptation of modern technologies. We believe that together with the scalability
of our shared services platform and our ability to seamlessly integrate
strategic acquisitions, our culture presents a substantial barrier to entry for
competitors in the future. These systems have facilitated our entry into three
new markets and successful integration of nine acquisitions since our inception
in 2004. We believe that our high quality operational procedures create high
customer satisfaction and comprehensive employee accountability, setting the
foundation for continuous expansion and growth.
Single
Source Service Provider. As
the communications market continues to evolve due to high bandwidth driven
applications, the once disparate wireline and wireless industry segments will
continue to converge into a ubiquitous technology landscape. As a
result, these industry segments will need service providers who can bridge these
two merging technologies. We intend to leverage our wireline and
wireless turn-key services to capitalize on our customers’ capital spend. We
believe that our ability to leverage our expertise in many communications
technologies provides us with a competitive advantage as our customers have
build out plans that require this expertise as their services
converge.
Large Footprint and Strong Customer
Relationships. We have been in business for over 20 years and have
achieved significant scale and strong customer relationships in each of the
industries in which we compete. As of August 4, 2010, our network includes 102
locations and a workforce of approximately 5,200 across the United States and
Canada. From 2007 to 2010, we have grown from five customers in two
industries to over 100 customers in four industries. Our primary
customer base consists of blue-chip, Fortune 200 companies in the media and
telecommunications industry, including such customers as DIRECTV, AT&T,
Clearwire Communications, Ericsson, Sprint, T-Mobile, Comcast, Cox
Communications, Verizon Communications, Charter Communications and Time Warner
Cable. We also serve significant Canadian customers, such as Rogers
Cable and Cogeco Cable. We believe our experience, technical
expertise, geographic reach and size are important to our customers and allow us
to effectively bid for large-scale contracts.
- 43
-
Reputation for Reliable Customer
Service and Technical Expertise. We believe that the strength
of our customer relationships is a direct result of our leading customer service
and technical expertise. Central to this is PROS, which creates
real-time visibility and accountability, detects and corrects operational
issues, allows multiple levels of employees to interact, leverages centralized
shared services, and allows efficient monitoring and management of operations.
In addition, we further differentiate ourselves from our competitors through our
integration of various technologies into our business, including GPS in our
fleet, handheld devices to streamline technician work order closure and
inventory consumption, and iPhone deployment to document quality and safety
observations. We believe our reputation for excellent quality,
customer service and technical expertise gives us an advantage in competing for
new contracts as well as in maintaining and extending our current customer
relationships.
Experienced Management Team.
Our management team, which includes our chief executive officer, chairman, chief
financial officer and divisional leaders, plays a significant role in
establishing and maintaining long-term relationships with our customers,
supporting the growth of our business and managing the financial aspects of our
operations. Our management team possesses significant industry
experience and contains a deep understanding of our customers and their
performance requirements. Generally, the management and key employees
of our recently acquired companies continue to work for us under
performance-aligned long-term employment or services agreements.
Strategy
The key
elements of our business strategy are:
Execute on Existing Backlog.
July 3, 2010, our current three-year backlog was approximately $735.0 million.
We intend to work closely with our customers to ensure we execute on our already
signed contracts at a performance level that exceeds our customers’ services
requirements. In addition, we are dedicated to utilizing our shared
services platform to ensure that we execute this existing backlog in a highly
profitable manner.
Expand and Diversify our
Backlog. We are
focused on growing and diversifying our backlog through increasing our
relationships with existing customers and building relationships with new
customers. We offer our customers a full range of outsourced
infrastructure services, including specialized engineering and design services,
construction management services, broadband network and wireless infrastructure
construction, repair and maintenance, and comprehensive residential and
commercial installation and fulfillment services. In many cases, our
customers only utilize a portion of the potential services that we can
provide. We will continue to utilize our reputation for quality and
service together with our differentiated technological capabilities to win new
contracts from our existing and new customers. In addition, we will
selectively enter new markets, either internally or through strategic
acquisitions. Potential new industries include power and utilities,
water and sewer infrastructure and government security. According to
IBISWorld estimates for 2010, these industries represent large capital
expenditure market opportunities of $82.2 billion, $33.7 billion, and $6.5
billion respectively.
Increase Efficiency through
Continued Development of our Technology. PROS is a highly customized,
web-based real-time reporting tool that enables us to have rapid insight into
our business. In addition, we capture data generated in the field by
our technicians and analyze trends in performance, safety, training and service
delivery to maximize our operational efficiency across our product and service
offerings. We plan to continue to develop our technology in an effort
to ensure we have the capabilities needed to effectively and profitably manage
our operations.
Pursue Selective
Acquisitions. We
selectively pursue strategic acquisitions that complement our existing business
through (i) diversifying our service offerings, customers, end markets and
geographies, (ii) adding experienced managers to the UniTek’s management team
and (iii) strengthening our financial profile. We believe that
attractive acquisition candidates exist as a result of the highly fragmented
nature of our industry, the inability of many smaller competitors to expand and
modernize due to capital constraints and the desire of owners of acquisitions
candidates for liquidity. We believe that our platform and
experienced management team will be attractive to acquisition
candidates.
- 44
-
Customers
Our
current customers include leading media and telecommunication companies such as
DIRECTV, AT&T, Clearwire Communications, Ericsson, Sprint, T-Mobile,
Comcast, Cox Communications, Verizon Communications, Charter Communications and
Time Warner Cable. We also serve significant Canadian customers, such
as Rogers Cable and Cogeco Cable.
During
the year ended December 31, 2009, our four largest customers as a percentage of
total revenue were DIRECTV (64%), Comcast (13%), Verizon Communications (8%) and
Rogers Cable (5%). During the three months ended April 3, 2010, our
four largest customers as a percentage of total revenue were DIRECTV (47%),
Comcast (13%), Verizon Communications (8%) and Clearwire Communications
(6%).
Backlog
Our
three-year backlog was approximately $735.0 million as of July 3, 2010 and
$709.0 million as of July 4, 2009, on a pro forma basis factoring in the
Merger. We expect to realize 23% in the remainder of fiscal 2010.
Approximately
$658.0 million (90%) of our backlog at July 3, 2010 was composed of services to
be performed under existing master service agreements and long term contracts,
with the remainder based on historical trends regarding the renewal of our
agreements and contracts.
Sales
and Marketing
The
majority of our work is awarded from new and existing customers. This work is
awarded to us directly or we are provided with opportunities to bid on new
projects based upon our competencies and performance. We typically enter into
contracts with these customers that range from one to three years. We market our
services through our individual business unit’s name and service mark. We
do this in order to maximize the branding and name recognition of each business
in their respective industries.
We employ
a sales and marketing team who respond to new opportunities as they are
identified. We internally process customer requests for proposals as
procured by our Business Development Team. Through our
proprietary systems, we track opportunities and respond based upon our
resources, strict financial criteria and overall strategic objectives of the
Company.
Safety
and Risk Management
Our
company culture requires safe work habits from all employees. We require our
employees to participate in internal training and service programs relevant to
their employment and to complete any training programs required by law. We
evaluate employees in part based upon their safety records and the safety
records of the employees they supervise. We have established a company-wide
safety program to share best practices and to monitor and improve compliance
with safety procedures and regulations. The risk management group reviews
accidents and claims for our operations, examine trends and implement changes in
procedures to address safety issues.
Major
Suppliers and Vendors
Under
many of our contracts, our customers supply the necessary equipment for
installation. We provide necessary ancillary materials. Under certain of our
contracts, we acquire materials from third parties and have not experienced any
significant difficulty in obtaining an adequate supply. We are not reliant on
any individual vendor to supply a significant portion of our equipment or
materials.
We
occasionally utilize independent contractors to supplement our in-house
workforce and manage seasonal workflow. Our independent contractors
are typically small business entities that provide their own vehicles, tools and
insurance coverage. We are not reliant on any individual source for a
significant portion of our outsourced labor.
Seasonality
Our
revenues and results of operations can be subject to seasonal and other
variations. These variations are influenced by weather, customer spending
patterns, bidding seasons, project schedules and timing and holidays. Typically,
our revenues are highest during the third quarter due to television viewing
habits and favorable weather patterns. While inclement weather can
negatively impact our results, it also represents an opportunity to perform
emergency restoration services.
- 45
-
Competition
Our
industry is highly competitive and highly fragmented. We often compete with a
number of companies in markets where we operate, ranging from small local
independent companies to large national firms. We also face
competition from the in-house service organizations of our existing and
prospective customers, including telecommunications, cable television and
engineering companies, which employ personnel who perform some of the same types
of services as those provided by us.
We
compete with Dycom Industries, Inc., MasTec, Inc., Quanta Services, Inc., Volt
Telecom and other providers of permanently outsourced infrastructure
services. We compete based upon our industry experience, technical
expertise, financial and operational resources, nationwide presence, industry
reputation and customer service. While we believe our customers consider a
number of factors when selecting a service provider, most of their work is
awarded through a bid process. We believe that we compete favorably
with our competitors on the basis of these factors.
Regulation
Our
operations are subject to various federal, state, local and international laws
and regulations including:
|
·
|
licensing,
permitting and inspection requirements applicable to electricians and
engineers;
|
|
·
|
building
codes;
|
|
·
|
permitting
and inspection requirements applicable to construction
projects;
|
|
·
|
regulations
relating to worker safety and environmental protection;
and
|
|
·
|
telecommunication
regulations affecting our fiber optic licensing
business.
|
We
believe that we have all the licenses required to conduct our operations and
that we are in substantial compliance with applicable regulatory
requirements. Our failure to comply with applicable regulations could
result in substantial fines or revocation of our operating
licenses.
Litigation
We are
subject to various litigation claims that occur in the ordinary course of
business, which we believe, even if decided adversely to us, would not have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Gerald
Farmer, et al. v. DirectSat USA, LLC
On June
11, 2008, three named plaintiffs, who were formerly employed as technicians by
DirectSat USA, LLC, a UniTek subsidiary, filed a claim in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging violations of the
Illinois Wage and Hour Laws and the Fair Labor Standards Act, or FLSA. These
allegations related to the payment of overtime. The plaintiffs have sought and
have been granted class certification for the state law claims. They
are demanding $7.4 million in damages related to these claims. We do
not believe these claims have merit, and we believe the damages claim is grossly
above any potential exposure we may face in this case.
On
February 9, 2010, plaintiffs’ counsel filed a companion case, Lashon
Jacks v. DirectSat et al., in the Cook County, Illinois Circuit
Court, seeking to expand the class in the Farmer case to include all technicians
in Illinois that worked with DirectSat after June 10, 2008. No
additional damages claims have been made, and we intend to defend this case,
along with the Farmer case, vigorously.
- 46
-
Monroe
et al. v. FTS USA, LLC and UniTek USA, LLC
On
February 15, 2008, plaintiffs, former employees of FTS USA, a UniTek
subsidiary, filed a class action in the United States District Court for the
Western District of Tennessee, alleging violations of the FLSA related to
overtime payments. Conditional class certification was granted, and
plaintiffs have made a claim for damages of $3.2 million. We do not
believe these claims have merit, and we believe the damages claim is grossly
above any potential exposure we may face in this case. We intend to
defend the case vigorously.
Employees
As of
August 4, 2010, we had a workforce of approximately 5,200. The number
of our workforce varies according to the level of our work in progress. We
maintain a nucleus of technical and managerial personnel to supervise all
projects and add employees as needed to complete specific projects.
We
attract and retain employees by offering technical training opportunities, bonus
opportunities, equity compensation plan, competitive salaries and a
comprehensive benefits package. We believe that our focus on training
and career development helps us to attract and retain quality
employees. Our employees participate in ongoing educational programs,
many of which are internally developed, to enhance their technical and
management skills through classroom and field training. We provide
opportunities for promotion and mobility within our organization that we also
believe helps us to retain our employees.
Properties
As of
August 4, 2010, we had one material lease agreement for our headquarters at 1777
Sentry Parkway West, Suite 302, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania. This
location has 21,233 square feet of office space. We lease other
locations throughout the United States and Canada. We own 0.9 acres
of property, including office and warehouse space, in Arlington,
Texas. For a map of our locations, see “Business”
above.
- 47
-
MANAGEMENT
The
following table set forth certain information regarding our officers and
directors as of the date of this prospectus.
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
||
Peter
Giacalone
|
50
|
President
and Chairman of the Board
|
||
C.
Scott Hisey
|
45
|
Chief
Executive Officer and Director
|
||
Ronald
J. Lejman
|
42
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
||
Richard
B. Berliner
|
57
|
Chief
Marketing Officer and Chief Executive Officer of BCI Communications, Inc
and Director
|
||
Elizabeth
Downey
|
40
|
Chief
Administrative Officer
|
||
Scott
Lochhead
|
38
|
Chief
Executive Officer, Advanced Communications USA, LLC
|
||
Christopher
Perkins
|
47
|
Chief
Executive Officer, FTS USA
|
||
Daniel
Yannantuono
|
37
|
Chief
Executive Officer, DirectSAT USA
|
||
Nicholas
Day(1)
|
41
|
General
Counsel, Corporate Secretary
|
||
Peter
Brodsky
|
39
|
Director
|
||
Daniel
J. Hopkin
|
32
|
Director
|
||
Richard
Siber
|
48
|
Director
|
||
Joseph
Colonnetta
|
48
|
Director
|
||
Mark
S. Dailey
|
52
|
Director
|
||
Dean
MacDonald
|
|
50
|
|
Director
|
(1) Mr.
Day will be leaving our Company in September 2010.
CURRENT
DIRECTORS
CLASS
II DIRECTORS – TERM TO EXPIRE AT THE 2010 ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
Peter Giacalone, 50, has been
the Chairman of our board of directors and President since January
2010. From July 2008 to January 2010, he served as the President of
UniTek USA, LLC, or UniTek USA. From March 2005 to June 2008, he was
the President and Chief Executive Officer of 180 Connect, Inc., a publicly
traded outsourced infrastructure services provider that was acquired by UniTek
and DIRECTV in 2008. He served as Executive Vice President, Customer
Satisfaction for DIRECTV from February 2004 to March 2005. From 1997
until he joined DIRECTV, Mr. Giacalone served as Vice President, Finance for The
News Corporation Limited, an international media and entertainment company. Mr.
Giacalone has his Masters of Business Administration and Bachelor of Arts
degrees from Adelphi University. Our board of directors has concluded
that Mr. Giacalone should serve on the board of directors due to his
significant experience in finance, business development, acquisitions and
integration to UniTek.
Peter Brodsky, 39, has been a
member of our board of directors since January 2010. Since 1995, Mr. Brodsky has
been with HM LLC, a private equity firm, where he serves as a Managing
Partner. Mr. Brodsky’s primary responsibility is deal sourcing, execution
and monitoring of the HM LLC’s media investments. Mr. Brodsky also serves
as a director of LIN Television (NYSE: TVL), Choice Cable TV, Canpages, and PDC
Pages. Prior to joining HM LLC, Mr. Brodsky worked in the Investment
Banking Division of Credit Suisse First Boston. Mr. Brodsky received his
Bachelor of Arts degree from Yale University. Our board of directors has
concluded that Mr. Brodsky should serve on the board of directors due to
his strong corporate leadership and investment experience.
Daniel J. Hopkin, 32, has
been a member of our board of directors since January 2010. Since
2004, Mr. Hopkin has been with HM LLC, a private equity firm where he served as
an associate from 2004 to 2006 and has served as a Vice President from 2007 to
present. He focuses primarily on the media and food
sectors. Previous to joining HM LCC, Mr. Hopkin worked in the
Investment Banking Division of Morgan Stanley. He received his
Bachelor of Arts degree and Masters degrees from Brigham Young University in
2002. Our board of directors has concluded that Mr. Hopkin should serve on the
board of directors due to his strong financial and corporate leadership
background.
- 48
-
CLASS
III DIRECTORS – TERM TO EXPIRE AT THE 2011 ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
C. Scott Hisey, 45, has been
our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our board of directors since January
2010. Prior to that time, Mr. Hisey was the founder and Chief
Executive Officer of UniTek USA. Since UniTek’s inception in 2004, Mr.
Hisey has led the Company through two private equity transactions, multiple
acquisitions, and has expanded the Company to include a workforce of
approximately 5,200 people across four diverse industries. Prior to
founding UniTek, Mr. Hisey spent over 15 years in positions of increasing
responsibility in both the cable television and satellite communications
industries. Starting as a field technician, he progressively worked his
way into senior management positions with larger companies. His roles
included Chief Operating Officer in a private equity turnaround and President of
a multi-service construction company. Mr. Hisey began his career in
the United States Navy. He served as a Second Class Radioman aboard the USS
Forrestal, and is an honorably discharged, disabled veteran. Mr.
Hisey also serves on the board of directors of the Satellite Broadcasting
Communications Association. Our board of directors has concluded that
that Mr. Hisey should serve on the board of directors due to his extensive
industry knowledge and executive experience gained from founding UniTek USA and
working in cable television and satellite communications.
Richard Siber, 48, has been a
member of our board of directors since January 2010. Mr. Siber has
spent the last 25 years exclusively in the wireless
industry. Currently, Mr. Siber is the President and CEO of
SiberConsulting LLC, which he founded in 2004. SiberConsulting
provides strategic, technical and marketing services to members within the
wireless ecosystem. From January 1994 to June 2004, Mr. Siber was a
partner in the Communications, Electronics, High Tech and Media and
Entertainment practice at Accenture. While there, he founded the
global wireless consulting practice and helped grow it to thousands of employees
and hundreds of millions in revenue. While at Accenture, Mr. Siber
was also deeply involved in a number of Government and Homeland Security
initiatives utilizing a variety of wireless technologies. Mr. Siber
has a Bachelor of Arts from Boston University, a Masters of Business
Administration from the Carroll School of Management from Boston College. He
also holds a certificate of special studies from Harvard University Extension
School. Mr. Siber serves or has served on the boards of directors for
Akos, Digit Wireless, InCode (sold to Verisign), Integrated Mobile,
JumpTap, and SingleTouch Interactive (BB: SITO), as well as a number of
Technology Advisory Boards and is involved with several charitable
organizations. Our board of directors has concluded that Mr. Siber
should serve on the board of directors due to his extensive executive leadership
and industry knowledge.
Joseph Colonnetta, 48, has
been a member of our board of directors since January 2010. Since
1998, Mr. Colonnetta has been with HM LLC, where he serves as a
Partner. Mr. Colonnetta’s primarily responsibilities are deal
sourcing and execution and monitoring of the HM LLC’s energy
investments. Mr. Colonnetta serves as a director of BlackBrush Oil
& Gas, TexStar Midstream Services, UniTek USA and TriDimension Energy. In
November 2008, Mr. Colonnetta was appointed by Texas Governor Rick Perry to
serve as a trustee of the Texas Prepaid Higher Education Tuition
Board. Prior to joining HM LLC, Mr. Colonnetta was a Partner with
Metropoulos and Co. Before Metropoulos, Mr. Colonnetta served in
various executive officer and oversight roles in companies owned by Bass
Investment Partners and Oppenheimer & Co. Mr. Colonnetta received
his Bachelors of Science degree from the University of Houston. Our board of
directors has concluded that Mr. Colonnetta should serve on the board
of directors due to his experience as a member of the board of directors of
numerous companies and broad corporate leadership experience.
CLASS
I DIRECTORS – TERM TO EXPIRE AT THE 2012 ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
Richard B. Berliner, 57, has been a member of our
board of directors since he founded our business in 1995, and now serves as our
Chief Marketing Officer and the Chief Executive Officer of our wireless
division, BCI Communications, Inc. From 1995 to January 2010, Mr. Berliner
served as the Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of
Berliner Communications, Inc., and he held the same positions at BCI
Communications, Inc. since its formation in 2005. Prior to 1995, he
served as Executive Vice President of Communications Development Systems and was
responsible for managing sales, marketing and customer activities for
construction services to wireless carriers. He has also previously
held multiple senior executive positions with AAT Communications, Inc., a
communications-oriented property management firm, and Drive Phone, Inc., a major
distributor of wireless telephones and services. Mr. Berliner
received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Rutgers University. Our board
of directors concluded that Mr. Berliner should serve on the board of directors
due to his comprehensive industry and leadership
experience.
- 49
-
Mark S. Dailey, 52, has been a member of our
board of directors since February 2006. Mr. Daily is a private
investor who from 1999 to 2004 held senior executive management positions
including Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing of Intralinks, Inc., a
venture-funded secure document distribution company, Chief Operating Officer of
LexiQuest, Inc., a technology-based company exploiting linguistics and natural
language processing in developing software tools to manage, access and retrieve
large Intranet document collections and Chief Operating Officer of Medcast
Networks, a venture capital-backed start-up delivering comprehensive medical
information to physicians. From 1986 to 1999, Mr. Dailey held various senior
level positions with Bloomberg Financial Markets, a global leader in the
delivery of international real-time financial information. Prior to
joining Bloomberg, Mr. Dailey worked for several investment banking
firms. Mr. Dailey received a Bachelor of Arts degree from St. John
Fisher College. Our board of directors has concluded that Mr. Daily should serve
on the board of directors due to his significant corporate management experience
in the technology industry.
Dean MacDonald, 50, has been a member of our
board of directors since January 2010. Mr. MacDonald currently serves
as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Newport Partners Income Fund, a
Toronto-based Private Equity Fund. Mr. MacDonald has a long and successful
career as an operating executive and entrepreneur. His operating experience
includes serving as the Chief Operating Officer of Rogers Cable and as the Chief
Executive Officer of Persona Communications, a TSX-listed cable and internet
services company. Mr. MacDonald worked with a syndicate of investment partners
to turn around Persona’s operations and subsequently sold the business at a
significant premium to its purchase price in 2007. Mr. MacDonald has also served
as chairman of the Newfoundland and Labrador Energy Corporation, which manages
the province’s oil and gas assets. In 2007, Mr. MacDonald was selected as
CEO of the Year by Birch Hill Capital Partners. Mr. MacDonald received his
Bachelor of Communications from Memorial University of Newfoundland in 1981. Our
board of directors has determined that Mr. MacDonald should serve on the board
of directors based on his management and investment experience in a number of
industries, including advertising, marketing and communications.
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
Ronald J. Lejman, 42, is our
Chief Financial Officer, a role he assumed in January 2010. From
September 2008 to January 2010, Mr. Lejman was the Chief Financial Officer of
UniTek USA. Prior to joining UniTek, from January 2005 to September
2008 Mr. Lejman was the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of
Freedom Enterprises, Inc., a Mid-Atlantic commercial construction company.
Prior to that time, Mr. Lejman has served as Chief Financial Officer for various
organizations, including The Stanley Works Europe, Middle East and Africa,
Stanley Bostitch and General Fiber Communications, Inc. He has also held
senior finance leadership positions at GE Capital and Amoco. This diverse
experience has provided Mr. Lejman relevant acquisition evaluation/integration
experience on a multinational scale. Mr. Lejman received his undergraduate
degree from the University of Illinois and Masters of Management degree from
Northwestern University’s J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of
Management.
Nicholas Day, 41, is our General Counsel
and Corporate Secretary, a role he assumed in October 2006. Prior to
joining us, Mr. Day served as Senior Corporate Counsel for Net2Phone, Inc., a
then Nasdaq-listed provider of voice over Internet protocol telephony
products and services from August 2002 to March 2006. From August
2000 to August 2002, Mr. Day served as Associate General Counsel for WorldGate
Communications, Inc., a then Nasdaq-listed provider of personal video telephony
products. Mr. Day began his career as a business attorney with the
law firm of Saul Ewing, LLP from September 1995 to August 2000. Mr.
Day has extensive corporate governance and industry-specific experience. Mr. Day
received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Duke University and his Juris
Doctorate degree, with honors, from Villanova University School of
Law. Mr. Day will be leaving our Company in September
2010.
- 50
-
Daniel Yannantuono, 37, is
the Chief Executive Officer of our DirectSat USA subsidiary, a role he assumed
in October 2008. Before becoming CEO, Mr. Yannantuono held the position of
President of DirectSat from January 2007 to October 2008. During
his tenure, DirectSat has become one of the largest contract partners for
DIRECTV with over 2000 technicians nationwide. Prior to DirectSat USA, he served
as Vice President of Operations for DirectSat’s parent company, UniTek USA from
August 2005. Before joining us, Mr. Yannantuono served as Vice President of
Finance for a major telecommunications services provider, where he played
important roles in developing the company and integrating several acquisitions.
Having held several management positions, Mr. Yannantuono brings significant
executive leadership experience to our management team. Mr. Yannantuono received
an undergraduate degree in business management and finance from Florida Atlantic
University and is currently pursuing a Masters of Business Administration from
Villanova University.
Elizabeth Downey, 40, is our
Chief Administrative Officer, a role she assumed in January 2008. Before
becoming Chief Administrative Officer, Ms. Downey held the position of Director
of Human Resources at UniTek from June 2006 to December 2007. Before joining us,
Ms. Downey served as Senior Vice President of Employee Relations for a
competitive local exchange carrier in the telecommunications sector, where she
played important roles in growing and developing that company. Having held
several executive management positions, including her role in another
telecommunications company and an international publishing company, Ms. Downey
brings significant leadership experience and human resources expertise to our
management team. Ms. Downey received a Masters of Business Administration and
holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in communications from the Pennsylvania State
University.
Christopher Perkins, 47, is
the Chief Executive Officer of our FTS USA subsidiary, a role he assumed in July
2006. As the founder and president of FTS (the business UniTek Global
Services acquired in 2006 to facilitate entry into the cable services market),
Mr. Perkins is responsible for the growth, performance and profitability of the
hard line broadband business. Mr. Perkins began his telecommunications career as
an installer. Soon after, he became a manager and then served as a vice
president of LB&L Cable, Inc. from March 1996 to March 2004. As the founder
of FTS, Mr. Perkins has managed every aspect of a multi-million dollar business
with numerous customers. In addition, from April 2004 to July 2005, Mr. Perkins
was the Director of Technical Operations for General Fiber Communications, one
of the largest cable contracting companies in the industry, in charge of
maintaining and growing an over $50 million revenue region. With his
background in cable services and telecommunications, Mr. Perkins has strong
industry knowledge and experience. Mr. Perkins received his Cable TV
Technician certification and his Engineering certification from the State
Technical Institute of Memphis.
Scott Lochhead, 38, is the
Chief Executive Officer of our Advanced Communications USA, LLC division, a role
he assumed in January 2010. Mr. Lochhead has over 18 years experience
in the telecommunications industry which includes over 12 years in executive
management, bringing both industry awareness and leadership experience to our
management team. From 2000 until UniTek’s acquisition of Nexlink
Communications in 2008, Mr. Lochhead served as the President of Nexlink
Communications, a company he founded. Prior to founding Nexlink he
was an executive manager for AT&T in the Florida market and has worked
internationally in Asia providing civil engineering and project management
supporting a major wireless build out in 1998. Mr. Lochhead has
been a Civil Engineering Associate since 1992 and received his Bachelor of Arts
degree from Sheridan College.
PRIOR
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Michael S. Guerriero, 48, was
the Chief Operating Officer of our BCI Communications, Inc. subsidiary, a role
he assumed in February 2006. He previously served as the Executive
Vice President of the Technical Services organization within BCI from February
2004 to January 2005. From July 2001 to December 2003, Mr. Guerriero
held the position of Area Vice President at Sprint responsible for the
PCS/wireless network build-out in the Northeast Region. Prior to that position,
he was the Director of Engineering for the Northeast and was responsible for the
initial design and deployment of the Sprint PCS/wireless network in the NY/NJ/CT
metro area. His professional career spans over 20 years and includes
a number of technical and leadership positions in the defense and
telecommunication industries. Mr. Guerriero received a Bachelor of
Science degree in Electrical Engineering from the New Jersey Institute of
Technology and is a licensed Professional Engineer. Mr. Guerriero
resigned from the Company effective as of the close of business on July 23,
2010.
Raymond A. Cardonne, Jr., 43,
was the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of our BCI Communications, Inc.
division, a role he assumed in November 2007. Prior to joining the
Company, Mr. Cardonne served as the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of
Refac Optical Group, a then AMEX-listed retail optical chain with over 500
locations, from August 2000 until February 2007. From December 1997
until August 2000, he served as a Vice President of Refac responsible for
technology licensing and commercialization. Prior to joining Refac,
Mr. Cardonne was a Vice President of Corporate Development at Technology
Management & Funding, L.P., a limited partnership formed to create and
develop early stage technology-based companies, from December 1994 through
November 1997. Mr. Cardonne also worked for NEPA Venture Funds, an
early-stage venture capital firm. Mr. Cardonne received his Bachelor
of Science degree and Masters of Business Administration from Lehigh
University. Mr. Cardonne left the Company on June 30,
2010.
- 51
-
Code
of Ethics for Senior Officers
Our board
of directors adopted a Code of Ethics for certain identified senior officers and
finance department personnel, or the Ethics Code. The Ethics
Code sets forth the Company’s conflict of interest policy and policies for the
protection of the Company’s property, business opportunities and proprietary
information. The Ethics Code requires prompt disclosure to
stockholders of any waiver of the Ethics Code for senior officers made by the
board of directors or any committee thereof. A copy of the Ethics
Code may be obtained, without charge, by writing to: UniTek Global Services,
Inc., 1777 Sentry Parkway West, Blue Bell, PA 19422, Attention: Corporate
Secretary, and is also available on our web page at www.unitekgs.com.
Compensation of
Directors
During
the year ended June 30, 2009, we implemented a compensation program for all of
our non-employee directors. Our non-employee directors include all of our
directors except for Richard B. Berliner, who is our Chief Marketing Officer and
Chief Executive Officer of BCI Communications, Inc., or BCI. Our non-employee
directors received the following compensation during the six months ended
December 31, 2009:
Change in
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension Value
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fees
|
and
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earned
|
Nonqualified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
or
|
Non-Equity
|
Deferred
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paid in
|
Stock
|
Option
|
Incentive Plan
|
Compensation
|
All Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
|
Awards
|
Awards
|
Compensation
|
Earnings
|
Compensation
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
($)
|
($)(1)(2)
|
($) (2)
|
($)
|
($)
|
($)
|
($)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Mark
S. Dailey
|
15,000 | 17,519 | — | — | — | — | 32,519 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Peter
J. Mixter*
|
34,000 | — | — | — | — | 34,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Mehran
Nazari*
|
16,500 | 17,519 | — | — | — | — | 34,019 | |||||||||||||||||||||
John
Stevens Robling, Jr.*
|
32,500 | — | — | — | — | 32,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Thom
Waye*
|
12,000 | 17,519 | — | — | — | — | 29,519 | |||||||||||||||||||||
110,000 | 52,557 | — | — | — | — | 162,557 |
*Resigned
January 27, 2010, the date the Merger was consummated.
(1) Represents
the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with
respect to the six months ended December 31, 2009, computed in accordance with
FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718.
(2) The
aggregate numbers of shares issuable upon the exercise of options for the
directors outstanding as of December 31, 2009 are as follows: Mr. Dailey
(options to purchase 50,000 shares); Mr. Mixter (options to
purchase 50,167 shares); Mr. Nazari (options to purchase 50,000
shares); and Mr. Robling (options to purchase 50,167
shares).
- 52
-
During
the six months ended December 31, 2009, two non-employee directors each received
a $17,500 annual fee for service on the board of directors during the fiscal
year. We issued 29,166 shares of our common stock to each of the
other non-employee directors, Messrs. Waye, Dailey and Nazari, (pursuant to the
Berliner 2009 Omnibus Equity Plan) as their annual stipend. Each non-employee
director received $2,000 per board of directors meeting attended in person, and
$1,000 for each board of directors meeting attended via telephone. Members of
the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee received $1,500 for attending
committee meetings during this period. In addition, all non-employee directors
are reimbursed for reasonable travel expenses incurred in connection with
attendance at board of directors and committee meetings.
Director
Compensation Policy for the Six Months Ended December 31, 2009
On
September 26, 2008, the board of directors established a new compensation
program for non-employee directors for the year ending June 30, 2009, which was
also applicable for the six months ended December 31, 2009:
|
·
|
Each
non-employee director will receive an annual stipend of
$17,500. For current directors, this will be paid in October of
each year. For new directors, this will be paid upon election
and on each anniversary date of their election to the board of
directors;
|
|
·
|
Each
non-employee director will continue to receive $2,000 for each board of
directors meeting attended in person and $1,000 for each meeting attended
by telephone;
|
|
·
|
Each
non-employee member of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee will
receive $1,500 for each meeting attended in person or by
telephone;
|
|
·
|
Each
non-employee director will be eligible for an annual stock option (or
other equity) award. In December 2009, each non-employee
director received, in his sole discretion, either 29,166 shares of
restricted common stock pursuant to the Berliner 2009 Omnibus Equity Plan
or a cash award of $17,500, which is the cash equivalent of the shares
awarded; and
|
|
·
|
Meeting
fees will be paid for regularly scheduled meetings only. The
Company’s director compensation policy is designed to take into account
the need for occasional special meetings or informational telephone
calls. No additional compensation will be paid for such
occurrences.
|
Directors
will continue to be reimbursed for reasonable travel expenses associated with
attending board or committee meetings.
Messrs.
Dailey, MacDonald and Siber are considered by the Company to be “independent” as
that term is defined by Rule 4200(a)(15) of the National Association of
Securities Dealers Manual (“Rule 4200(a)(15)”). On January 27, 2010,
the board of directors approved a new compensation program for these independent
directors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011. Each will
receive an annual stipend of $15,000, $2,500 for each board of directors meeting
attended in person and $1,500 for each board of directors meeting attended by
telephone, plus related expenses. If any of Messrs. Dailey, MacDonald
and Siber are members of the Audit Committee or the Compensation Committee, they
will receive $500 for each such committee meeting attended in person or by
telephone. The Chairman of the Audit Committee and our “audit
committee financial expert” (as defined by SEC rules adopted pursuant to the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) on the committee is currently Mr. Siber, who will
receive an additional annual stipend of $7,500 as Chairman. Messrs.
Dailey, MacDonald and Siber will be eligible for additional equity awards at the
discretion of the board of directors, subject to attendance at no less than 75%
of all board of directors and committee meetings, as applicable, during the
fiscal year preceding the award.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
The
following table sets forth information regarding the compensation awarded to
those persons (i) who served or acted as the Company’s principal executive
officer through December 31, 2009, (ii) who were the Company’s other two most
highly compensated executive officers through December 31, 2009 and (iii)
persons who would have been one of the most highly compensated executive
officers had they been employed by the Company as of December 31, 2009, or the
Named Executive Officers, for the past two fiscal years. In January
2010, the Company changed its fiscal year from June 30 to December 31, and
therefore, the following table includes the compensation of these executives for
the six month period ended December 31, 2009.
- 53
-
Name and Principal
Position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
Option
Awards
($)(1)
|
All Other
Compensation
($)(2)
|
Total
($)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Richard
B. Berliner
|
6
Months Ended
12/31/09
|
180,000 | - | - | - | 6,000 | 186,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Chairman
and Chief
|
2009
|
360,000 | - | - | 51,551 | 18,300 | 429,851 | |||||||||||||||||||
Executive
Officer(3)
|
2008
|
358,364 | 860,058 | - | 98,416 | 17,500 | 1,334,338 | |||||||||||||||||||
Michael
S. Guerriero
|
6
Months Ended
12/31/09
|
112,500 | - | - | - | 3,600 | 116,100 | |||||||||||||||||||
Chief
Operating Officer (4)
|
2009
|
225,000 | - | - | 220,175 | 14,100 | 459,275 | |||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
224,517 | 407,281 | - | 20,620 | 13,446 | 665,864 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Raymond
A. Cardonne, Jr.
|
6
Months Ended
12/31/09
|
112,500 | - | - | - | 3,600 | 116,100 | |||||||||||||||||||
Chief
Financial Officer (5)
|
2009
|
225,000 | 33,750 | - | 26,591 | 14,100 | 299,441 | |||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
150,000 | 45,000 | - | 21,544 | 4,800 | 221,344 |
(1)
|
Represents
stock options granted under the Berliner 1999 Omnibus Equity
Plan. Option award values are based on the Black-Scholes
valuation method. The below table identifies the assumptions we
used for this calculation. The “Value” column below represents the dollar
amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with respect
to the six months ended December 31, 2009 in accordance with FASB
Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. Additional information on
stock options awarded to our executive officers can be found in the
section below entitled Grants of Plan-Based
Awards.
|
STOCK OPTION VALUATION TABLE
Name
|
Grant
Date
|
Shares
|
Value
($)
|
Dividend
Yield
|
Risk-Free
Interest Rate
|
Volatility
|
Life
(Years)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Michael
S. Guerriero
|
12/21/05
|
75,000 | - | 0 | % | 4.39 | % | 75 | % | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
08/11/06
|
100,000 | - | 0 | % | 4.89 | % | 78 | % | 5 | |||||||||||||||||
03/01/07
|
50,000 | 3,281 | 0 | % | 4.51 | % | 72 | % | 5 | |||||||||||||||||
10/01/08
|
420,000 | 63,959 | 0 | % | 3.02 | % | 64 | % | 6.25 | |||||||||||||||||
Raymond
A. Cardonne, Jr.
|
12/03/07
|
100,000 | 8,864 | 0 | % | 3.39 | % | 68 | % | 5 |
(2)
|
Represents
car allowance compensation and payments made by the Company as part of the
Company’s 401(k) Plan matching program.
|
|
(3)
|
On
September 21, 2009, Mr. Berliner returned to Berliner stock option grants
to purchase 250,000 shares of our common stock.
|
|
(4)
|
Mr.
Guerriero resigned from the Company effective as of the close of business
on July 23, 2010.
|
|
(5)
|
Mr.
Cardonne became Chief Financial Officer on November 2,
2007. The amounts shown above for 2008 are amounts earned from
November 2, 2007 to June 30, 2008. Pursuant to the terms of his
employment agreement, Mr. Cardonne left the employment of the Company
effective June 30, 2010.
|
EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENTS OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The
compensation committee of our board of directors, or Compensation Committee,
recommended, and the board of directors approved, the Employment Agreements for
the Named Executive Officers described below. The compensation and
severance provisions of these agreements are outlined below.
Peter Giacalone. On July 5,
2009, UniTek USA entered into an Employment Agreement with Mr. Giacalone, now
our Chairman and President, as amended by the Amendment to Employment Agreement,
dated December 23, 2009. On April 27, 2010, the agreement was
assigned by UniTek USA to Berliner with Mr. Giacalone’s consent. The employment
agreement was effective as of July 5, 2009 and has a three-year term expiring
July 5, 2012.
- 54
-
Mr. Giacalone
receives an annual base salary of $325,000.
Mr. Giacalone
is entitled to participate in all of our compensation and employee benefit
plans. Mr. Giacalone is eligible to earn a cash bonus at the end of
each fiscal year based on operational and financial criteria set by the
Compensation Committee and UniTek’s board of directors. For the fiscal
year ending December 31, 2010, Mr. Giacalone’s target bonus is
$225,000.
Mr. Giacalone
may be entitled to receive certain payments upon termination of his
employment. If Mr. Giacalone’s employment is terminated without
Cause, if he resigns for Good Reason or upon Mr. Giacalone’s death or
Disability, he will be entitled to receive from UniTek, in addition to his
annual base salary, benefits and other compensation earned through the date of
termination, or the Accrued Obligations, (1) (A) upon death or Disability, his
annual base salary for twelve (12) months following the date of termination or
(B) upon termination without Cause or with Good Reason, his annual base salary
for twenty four (24) months following the date of termination, (2) the pro-rata
portion of his annual incentive bonus for the calendar year in which the
termination occurred and (3) payment of certain medical benefits expenses
sufficient to maintain Mr. Giacalone’s benefits at the level as of the date
of termination for twelve (12) months following the date of termination.
If Mr. Giacalone’s employment is terminated with Cause, he is entitled to
receive the Accrued Obligations. Payments made in connection with
termination of employment are subject to Mr. Giacalone’s execution of a
general release of claims.
Mr. Giacalone’s
employment agreement contains customary confidentiality, non-competition and
non-solicitation provisions. Mr. Giacalone’s non-competition period is two
years following the date of termination.
C. Scott Hisey. On July 5,
2009, UniTek USA entered into an Employment Agreement with Mr. Hisey, our Chief
Executive Officer, as amended by the Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated
December 23, 2009. On April 27, 2010, the agreement was assigned by
UniTek USA to Berliner with Mr. Hisey’s consent. The agreement was effective as
of July 5, 2009 and has a three-year term expiring July 5, 2012.
Mr. Hisey
receives an annual base salary of $325,000.
Mr. Hisey
is entitled to participate in all of our compensation and employee benefit
plans. Mr. Hisey is eligible to earn a cash bonus at the end of each
fiscal year based on operational and financial criteria set by the Compensation
Committee and UniTek’s board of directors. For the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2010, Mr. Hisey’s target bonus is $225,000.
Mr. Hisey
may be entitled to receive certain payments upon termination of his
employment. If Mr. Hisey’s employment is terminated without Cause, if
he resigns for Good Reason or upon Mr. Hisey’s death or Disability, he will
be entitled to receive from UniTek, in addition to the Accrued Obligations, (1)
(A) upon death or Disability, his annual base salary for twelve (12) months
following the date of termination or (B) upon termination without Cause or with
Good Reason, his annual base salary for twenty four (24) months following the
date of termination, (2) the pro-rata portion of his annual incentive bonus for
the calendar year in which the termination occurred and (3) payment of certain
medical benefits expenses sufficient to maintain Mr. Hisey’s benefits at
the level as of the date of termination for twelve (12) months following the
date of termination. If Mr. Hisey’s employment is terminated with
Cause, he is entitled to receive the Accrued Obligations. Payments made in
connection with termination of employment are subject to Mr. Hisey’s
execution of a general release of claims.
Mr. Hisey’s
employment agreement contains customary confidentiality, non-competition and
non-solicitation provisions. Mr. Hisey’s non-competition period is two
years following the date of termination.
Ronald J. Lejman. On July 5,
2009, UniTek USA entered into an Employment Agreement with Mr. Lejman, our Chief
Financial Officer, as amended by the Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated
December 23, 2009. On April 27, 2010, the agreement was assigned by
UniTek USA to Berliner with Mr. Lejman’s consent.
The
agreement was effective as of July 5, 2009 and has a three-year term expiring
July 5, 2012.
- 55
-
Mr. Lejman
receives an annual base salary of $250,000.
Mr. Lejman
is entitled to participate in all of our compensation and employee benefit
plans. Mr. Lejman is eligible to earn a cash bonus at the end of each
fiscal year based on operational and financial criteria set by the Compensation
Committee and UniTek’s board of directors.
For the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2010, Mr. Lejman’s target bonus is
$200,000.
Mr. Lejman
may be entitled to receive certain payments upon termination of his
employment. If Mr. Lejman’s employment is terminated without Cause,
if he resigns for Good Reason or upon Mr. Lejman’s death or Disability, he
will be entitled to receive from UniTek, in addition to the Accrued Obligations,
(1) (A) upon death or Disability, his annual base salary for twelve (12) months
following the date of termination or (B) upon termination without Cause or with
Good Reason, his annual base salary for twenty four (24) months following the
date of termination, (2) the pro-rata portion of his annual incentive bonus for
the calendar year in which the termination occurred and (3) payment of certain
medical benefits expenses sufficient to maintain Mr. Lejman’s benefits at
the level as of the date of termination for twelve (12) months following the
date of termination. If Mr. Lejman’s employment is terminated with
Cause, he is entitled to receive the Accrued Obligations. Payments made in
connection with termination of employment are subject to Mr. Lejman’s
execution of a general release of claims.
Mr. Lejman’s
employment agreement contains customary confidentiality, non-competition and
non-solicitation provisions. Mr. Lejman’s non-competition period is two
years following the date of termination.
The
employment agreements with Messrs. Giacalone, Hisey and Lejman use the same
definitions for each of the terms, “Cause,” “Good Reason” and “Disability,” as
follows:
|
·
|
“Cause”
generally means (i) committing willful misconduct, willfully disregarding
our code of conduct or willfully failing to comply with the reasonable and
lawful directives of our board of directors, where such conduct has a
materially detrimental effect on us, (ii) breaching any material term or
provision of the employment agreement or any other written agreement with
us, which breach is not promptly cured, (iii) the board of directors
determining in good faith that the relevant individual has committed an
act of fraud or theft against us or any wrongful act or omission intended
to result in his personal enrichment or (iv) the relevant individual being
convicted of a felony or other offense involving fraud or moral
turpitude.
|
|
·
|
“Good
Reason” generally means, subject to our right to cure (i) assigning to the
relevant individual any duties inconsistent, in the aggregate, in any
material respect with his employment agreement, (ii) reducing the relevant
individual’s base salary, other than a reduction in base salary of all
UniTek senior management due to poor financial performance of UniTek or
(iii) our material breach of the employment
agreement.
|
|
·
|
“Disability”
generally means the inability of the relevant individual, due to illness
or accident or other mental or physical incapacity, to perform any of his
obligations under the employment agreement for 180 calendar days in the
aggregate over 360 consecutive calendar
days.
|
Richard B.
Berliner. On June 30, 2009, the Company entered into an
Employment Agreement with Mr. Berliner, then our Chief Executive Officer and
President. The agreement was effective as of June 30, 2009 and has a
two-year term expiring June 30, 2011. The agreement provides for an
annual salary of $360,000. The agreement provides for indemnification
of Mr. Berliner by the Company in connection with any action by reason of the
fact that he is or was a director, officer or employee of the
Company.
Mr.
Berliner’s compensation program also includes a cash bonus component based
entirely on the Company’s financial performance during the
year. After considering several financial metrics, such as revenue,
gross margin, and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization, or EBITDA, the Compensation Committee recommended, and the board
of directors approved, a cash bonus for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010
based upon the Company’s EBITDA during the year. The Compensation
Committee established the following targets for Mr. Berliner’s bonus in this
regard:
- 56
-
|
·
|
If
EBITDA is less than $3.5 million for fiscal 2010, Mr. Berliner
will not receive a cash bonus;
|
|
·
|
If
EBITDA is $3.5 million through $4.5 million, Mr. Berliner will receive a
cash bonus equal to 3% of EBITDA; and
|
|
·
|
If
EBITDA is over $4.5 million, Mr. Berliner will receive a cash bonus equal
to 4% of EBITDA.
|
In
addition to base salary and cash bonus, as outlined above, Mr. Berliner’s
Employment Agreement also states that he is eligible for stock option or other
equity awards as part of his annual bonus program and may also received stock
options or other equity awards in the discretion of the board of
directors. The agreement will also provide for a continuation of Mr.
Berliner’s existing annual car allowance of $12,000, and for the Company to pay
all of Mr. Berliner’s health insurance costs.
On
January 27, 2010, we amended the June 30, 2009 Employment Agreement with Mr.
Berliner, now the Chief Marketing Officer of UniTek and the Chief Executive
Officer of BCI. The amendment provides that the performance targets for
Mr. Berliner’s annual bonuses will be based on the revenue, gross margins and
EBITDA of BCI, rather than UniTek as a whole. The amendment revises the
terms and procedures relating to payments by the Company to Mr. Berliner
following the termination of his employment so that any such payments comply
with the provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. In
addition, in order to receive severance payments following termination of his
employment, Mr. Berliner must execute a release of claims against the
Company.
Michael S.
Guerriero. On June 30, 2009, the Company entered into an
Employment Agreement with Mr. Guerriero, then our Chief Operating
Officer. The agreement was effective as of July 1, 2009 and has a
two-year term expiring June 30, 2011. Effective as of the close of
business on July 23, 2010, Mr. Guerriero resigned from the
Company. The agreement provided for a base annual salary of
$225,000. The agreement also provided for indemnification of Mr.
Guerriero by the Company against any expenses, judgments, fines, penalties and
settlement amounts paid which may be reasonably incurred by Mr. Guerriero in
connection with any action by reason of the fact that he is or was a director,
officer or employee of the Company.
Mr.
Guerriero’s compensation program, as set forth in his Employment Agreement, also
includes a cash bonus component based primarily on the Company’s overall
financial performance during the year. After considering several
financial metrics, the Compensation Committee recommended, and the board of
directors approved, a cash bonus based primarily on the Company’s EBITDA and
revenue for the 2010 fiscal year, and also including a component based on branch
office performance, customer satisfaction and executive management and
development. As a result of Mr. Guerriero’s resignation from the
Company, effective July 23, 2010, he is not eligible to receive a cash bonus for
the 2010 fiscal year.
Mr.
Guerriero did not receive a cash bonus for fiscal 2009. In addition
to base salary and cash bonus, as outlined above, Mr. Guerriero’s Employment
Agreement also provided that he was eligible for stock option or other equity
awards as part of his annual bonus program and any stock options or other equity
awards that the board of directors may award in its discretion. The
board of directors did not award stock options to Mr. Guerriero as part of his
fiscal 2009 performance bonus plan. Mr. Guerriero did receive an
award of 420,000 options to acquire shares of common stock on October 1, 2008 at
$1.48 per share, which was the fair market value of BCI’s common stock at that
date, as part of his fiscal 2008 performance bonus plan. Mr.
Guerriero’s agreement also provides for a continuation of Mr. Guerriero’s annual
car allowance of $7,200, and for the Company to pay all of Mr. Guerriero’s
health insurance costs.
On
January 27, 2010, Berliner amended its employment agreement with Mr. Guerriero,
then Chief Operating Officer of BCI, which had substantially the same terms and
conditions as the amendment to Mr. Berliner’s employment agreement, as described
above.
- 57
-
On July
8, 2010, Berliner entered into a second amendment to its employment agreement
with Mr. Guerriero, pursuant to which Mr. Guerriero resigned from all of his
positions of employment with the Company and any of its affiliates, effective as
of the close of business on July 23, 2010. Beginning with the first
applicable payroll date after July 23, 2010 and for twelve months thereafter,
Mr. Guerriero will receive severance payments equal to one year of salary, paid
ratably over the severance period in accordance with the Company’s normal
payroll practices, including applicable withholdings. Under the terms
of Mr. Guerriero’s original employment agreement, he agreed to be subject to
certain non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions for 12 months
following his termination of employment. The second amendment changed
the definition of “Competition” and “Competing Business” such that Mr. Guerriero
is not permitted to perform certain activities for companies in the same line of
business as BCI through July 23, 2011.
Raymond A. Cardonne,
Jr. On November 15, 2007, the Company entered into an
Employment Agreement with Raymond A. Cardonne, Jr., then our Chief Financial
Officer. The agreement’s term expired June 30, 2010, at which time
Mr. Cardonne left the employment of the Company. The agreement
provided for an annual salary of $225,000 and also provided the same
indemnification rights as Mr. Guerriero’s employment agreement, as described
above.
Pursuant
to the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Cardonne’s compensation program
could have also included a cash bonus component based partly on the Company’s
overall financial performance during the year, and partly on a subjective
evaluation of Mr. Cardonne’s personal performance by the Compensation Committee
and the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee did not
believe it was appropriate to base Mr. Cardonne’s incentive bonus entirely on
financial metrics, because the Committee believed Mr. Cardonne should not be
entirely motivated by short term financial metrics but rather on the long-term
best interest of the Company with a focus on appropriate risk
management. Mr. Cardonne received a cash bonus of $33,750 for the
2009 fiscal year.
In
addition to base salary and cash bonus, as outlined above, Mr. Cardonne’s
Employment Agreement provided that he was eligible for stock option or other
equity awards as part of his annual bonus program and any stock options or other
equity awards that the board of directors may award in its
discretion. The agreement also provides for an annual car allowance
for Mr. Cardonne of $7,200.
On
January 27, 2010, Berliner amended its employment agreement with Mr. Cardonne,
then Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of BCI. The amendment
provided for Mr. Cardonne to remain employed by Berliner through
June 30, 2010, or the Resignation Date, after which time he is eligible to
receive certain post-employment payments and benefits. In addition, all unvested
stock options held by Mr. Cardonne vested on the Resignation Date and will be
exercisable for three months thereafter. The amendment revised the terms
and procedures relating to payments by the Company to Mr. Cardonne following the
termination of his employment so that any such payments comply with the
provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Mr. Cardonne
executed a release of claims against the Company in order to receive severance
payments following the Resignation Date.
OUTSTANDING
EQUITY AWARDS AT DECEMBER 31, 2009
The
following table sets forth all outstanding equity awards held by the Named
Executive Officers at December 31, 2009.
Name
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable (1)
|
Option
Exercise Price
($)
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
|||||||||
Michael
S. Guerriero
|
75,000 | - | 0.40 |
12/21/2015
|
|||||||||
100,000 | - | 0.55 |
8/11/2016
|
||||||||||
25,000 | 25,000 | (2) | 1.28 |
3/1/2017
|
|||||||||
210,000 | 210,000 | (3) | 1.48 |
10/1/2018
|
|||||||||
Raymond
A. Cardonne, Jr.
|
50,000 | 50,000 | (4) | 1.20 |
12/3/2017
|
|
(1)
|
On
September 21, 2009, Mr. Berliner cancelled stock option grants to purchase
250,000 shares of our common stock. At December 31, 2009, he did not hold
any outstanding equity awards.
|
- 58
-
|
(2)
|
These
options were originally scheduled to vest as follows: 12,500 on
3/1/2010 and 12,500 on 3/1/2011. Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Guerriero’s
employment agreement, as amended, all unvested options became fully vested
upon the effectiveness of his resignation on July 23, 2010 and exercisable
for up to three months thereafter.
|
|
(3)
|
These
options were originally scheduled to vest as follows: 105,000 on 10/1/2010
and 105,000 on 10/1/2011. See note
(2).
|
|
(4)
|
These
options were originally scheduled to vest as follows: 25,000 on 12/3/2010
and 25,000 on 12/3/2011. Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Cardonne’s
employment agreement, as amended, all unvested options became fully vested
upon the effectiveness of his resignation on June 30, 2010 and exercisable
for up to three months thereafter.
|
OPTION
EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
There
were no exercises of stock options held by the Named Executive Officers during
the six months ended December 31, 2009. For option exercises and stock vested
during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, please refer to our Proxy Statement
on Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on October 27, 2009.
POTENTIAL
PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
Richard B.
Berliner. Mr. Berliner has entered into an Employment
Agreement with the Company, dated June 30, 2009, as amended January 27, 2010,
that provides for potential payments upon termination of his employment or a
change in control of the Company. Pursuant to the agreement, Mr.
Berliner is required to devote all of his business time, attention, skill and
efforts exclusively to Company’s business and affairs. If his
employment is terminated “Without Cause,” if he resigns for “Good Reason” or if
he is terminated immediately prior to or in connection with, or within six
months immediately following, a “Change of Control,” he will be entitled to an
amount equal to his base salary then in effect for the remainder of the
employment term (which ends on June 30, 2011) or for one year, whichever is
longer. Payments made in connection with his termination of employment are
generally subject to his delivery to us of a general release of
claims. Under the agreement, for 12 months following his termination
of employment, he will be subject to certain non-competition and
non-solicitation restrictions. Payments made in connection with his
termination are subject to his delivery to the Company of a general release of
claims.
Under Mr.
Berliner’s Employment Agreement, “Without Cause” generally means a termination
other than due to having (i) materially breached or materially failed to
perform his duties, with the breach constituting self-dealing, willful
misconduct or recklessness, (ii) committed an act of dishonesty in the
performance of his duties or conduct detrimental to our business,
(iii) been convicted of a felony or any crime involving moral turpitude,
(iv) materially breached or materially failed to perform his obligations or
(v) violated in any material respects the confidentiality, non-competition
or non-solicitation provisions of his Employment Agreement. “Good
Reason” generally means (i) a significant change in the nature or scope of
Mr. Berliner’s duties, (ii) a failure by UniTek to pay Mr. Berliner the
amounts he is due under his Employment Agreement, (iii) a relocation of our
headquarters more than 65 miles from Mr. Berliner’s current residence or
(iv) any other material breach by UniTek of the Employment Agreement that
remains uncured after a specified length of time. A “Change of
Control” generally means the consummation of (i) any merger, consolidation
or reorganization unless securities representing 50% or more of the total
combined voting power of the successor corporation is held by the persons who
held such voting power immediately prior to the transaction, (ii) any
transfer, sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets or
(iii) the acquisition, directly or indirectly, by an person or related
group of persons of beneficial ownership of securities having more than 50% of
the total combined voting power of our outstanding securities pursuant to a
tender or exchange offer (excluding a public offering of our common stock to
raise capital).
Michael S.
Guerriero. Please see the description of Mr. Guerriero’s
employment agreement, and amendments thereto, with the Company under the heading
“Employment Agreements of Named Executive Officers.”
Raymond A. Cardonne,
Jr. Please see the description of Mr. Cardonne’s employment
agreement, and amendments thereto, with the Company under the heading
“Employment Agreements of Named Executive Officers.”
Peter
Giacalone. Please see the description of Mr. Giacalone’s
employment agreement, and amendments thereto, with the Company under the heading
“Employment Agreements of Named Executive Officers.”
- 59
-
C. Scott
Hisey. Please see the description of Mr. Giacalone’s
employment agreement, and amendments thereto, with the Company under the heading
“Employment Agreements of Named Executive Officers.”
Ronald J.
Lejman. Please see the description of Mr. Lejman’s employment
agreement, and amendments thereto, with the Company under the heading
“Employment Agreements of Named Executive Officers.”
Audit,
Compensation and Special Committees and Nominations for Board of
Directors
The board
of directors has established an Audit Committee and a Compensation Committee to
devote attention to specific subjects and to assist the board of directors in
the discharge of its responsibilities. The functions of those committees and
their current members are set forth below.
The
Audit Committee
The Audit
Committee recommends to the board of directors the appointment of the firm
selected to serve as the independent registered public accountant for the
Company and its subsidiaries and monitors the performance of any such firm. It
also reviews and approves the scope of the audit and evaluates, with the
independent registered public accountant, the Company’s audit and annual
financial statements, reviews with management the status of internal accounting
controls, evaluates issues having a potential financial impact on the Company
which may be brought to the Audit Committee’s attention by management, the
independent registered public accountant, or the board of directors and
evaluates public financial reporting documents of the Company. The current
members of the Audit Committee are Richard Siber and Mark S. Dailey, and the
board of directors has determined that all of these members are
independent. Mr. Siber currently serves as Chairman of the Audit
Committee and as the Audit Committee’s “financial expert” as defined by the
rules of the Commission. The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a charter
approved and adopted by the board of directors, a copy of which may be found on
the Company’s website at www.unitekgs.com.
The
Compensation Committee
The board
of directors formed a Compensation Committee on February 14, 2007 to assist the
board of directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities
for:
|
·
|
compensation
of executive officers;
|
·
|
compensation
of any other employees that receive severance arrangements outside of the
ordinary course of the Company’s standard practices;
and
|
·
|
administration
of the Company’s compensation and benefit plans with respect to all
eligible participants, including stock option and other equity incentive
plans, profit sharing plans, and any other plans that require or provide
for approval or administration by the board of
directors.
|
Although
the Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the board of directors with
respect to compensation decisions and the Company’s compensation and benefit
plans, ultimate approval authority rests with the board of directors. The
Compensation Committee has the direct authority to hire and fire advisors and
compensation consultants, and to approve their compensation by the Company,
which is obligated to pay these advisors and consultants. These advisors report
directly to the Compensation Committee. We have in the past used compensation
consultants to help give direction to the Compensation Committee regarding
executive pay. We do not currently engage a compensation consultant but may
decide to use one in the future. The current members of the Compensation
Committee are Peter Brodsky, Joseph Colonnetta and Daniel
Hopkin. Mr. Brodsky currently serves as Chairman of the
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee operates pursuant to charter
approved and adopted by the board of directors, a copy of which may be found on
the Company’s website at www.unitekgs.com.
- 60
-
The
Special Committee
In
connection with the Merger, the board of directors established a special
committee, or the Special Committee, composed of two Berliner directors
(initially Richard Berliner and Mark S. Dailey) who were directors prior to the
Merger and one post-Effective Time Berliner independent director appointed by
the board of directors (initially Richard Siber). The Special Committee
will automatically dissolve on January 27, 2013. For so long as the
Special Committee exists, the Company may not take certain actions without the
Special Committee’s consent, including:
|
·
|
amending
or modifying the Charter or the Bylaws in a manner that would amend the
rights of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.00002 per
share, or the Series A Preferred, or the Series B
Preferred;
|
·
|
issuing
additional shares of Series A Preferred or Series B Preferred to an
Affiliated Party (as such term is defined in the Merger
Agreement);
|
·
|
making
certain changes or determinations with respect to the BMO Loan Documents
(as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement);
or
|
·
|
entering
into any transactions or amending certain agreements with affiliated
parties, including HM LLC (except for employment arrangements and benefit
programs approved by the board of directors or the Compensation Committee
of the board of directors).
|
The
Nominating Process
The
Company does not currently have an Executive Committee or a Nominating
Committee. Due to the current size and composition of the board of directors,
the functions customarily attributable to an Executive Committee and a
Nominating Committee are performed by the board of directors as a
whole.
The
Company’s board of directors believes that it is not necessary at present to
have a standing Nominating Committee or a charter with respect to the nomination
process because the size and composition of the board of directors allow it to
adequately identify and evaluate qualified candidates for directors. However,
the Company’s board of directors may consider appointing such a committee in the
future. Currently, each of the directors participates in the consideration of
director nominees, and the evaluation of candidates on the basis of financial
literacy, industry knowledge, relevant experience, stockholder status, moral
character, independence and willingness and ability to serve. Aside from the
foregoing qualities, the board of directors does not have a minimum set of
qualifications that must be met by nominees.
If a
position on the board of directors were to unexpectedly become vacant, it would
be filled by the board of directors and all remaining directors would
participate in the selection of an appropriate individual to fill the vacancy.
The newly appointed director would serve out the remainder of the term of the
director whose position became vacant.
Stockholder
Communications with the Board of Directors
The
Company’s stockholders may communicate directly with members of its board of
directors. For direct communication with any member of the board of directors,
please send your communication in a sealed envelope addressed to the applicable
director inside of another envelope addressed to Ronald J. Lejman, Chief
Financial Officer, UniTek Global Services, Inc., 1777 Sentry Parkway West,
Gwynedd Hall, Suite 302, Blue Bell, PA 19422. Mr. Lejman will
forward such communication to the indicated director.
Compliance
with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act, requires the Company’s directors, executive officers,
and individuals who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s
equity securities to file initial reports of ownership and changes in ownership
of common stock with the SEC. Such persons are required by applicable
regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they
file.
- 61
-
To the
Company’s knowledge, based solely on the review of the copies of such reports
furnished to the Company, all of the Company’s directors, officers and 10%
stockholders have complied with the applicable Section 16(a) reporting
requirements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 and for the six months
ended December 31, 2009.
- 62
-
SECURITY OWNERSHIP
OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The
following table reflects, as of August 4, 2010, the beneficial common stock
ownership of (a) each of our directors, (b) each named executive officer, (c)
each person known by us to be a beneficial holder of five percent (5%) or more
of our common stock and (d) all of our executive officers and directors as a
group.
Except as
otherwise noted in the footnotes below, each of the beneficial owners has, to
our knowledge, sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of
common stock and the business address of such beneficial holders is c/o UniTek
Global Services, Inc., 1777 Sentry Parkway West, Gwynedd Hall, Suite 302, Blue
Bell, PA 19422.
Total Number of
Shares of
|
Shares Beneficially Owned After this Offering
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares Beneficially Owned
Prior to this Offering
|
Common Stock
Post Conversion
|
Excluding Exercise of
Over-allotment
|
Including Exercise of
Over-allotment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Holder
|
Common
Stock
|
Series B
Preferred
|
of Preferred
Stock(1)
|
Percentage
|
Number
|
Percentage
|
Number
|
Percentage
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sector
Performance Fund, LP (a)
|
87,454,886 | 219,144 |
98,412,086
|
(2)
|
66.61 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HM
Unitek Coinvest, LLP (a)
|
13,319,640 | - | 13,319,640 |
(3)
|
9.74 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SPF
SBS LP (a)
|
5,525,574 | 13,847 | 6,217,924 |
(4)
|
4.52 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter
Brodsky, Director
|
106,300,100 | 232,991 | 117,949,650 |
(5)
|
79.47 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joseph
Colonnetta, Director
|
106,300,100 | 232,991 | 117,949,650 |
(6)
|
79.47 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Daniel
Hopkin, Director
|
- | - | - |
(7)
|
N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richard
B. Berliner, Director and Chief Marketing Officer
|
7,522,964 | - | 7,522,964 |
(8)
|
5.50 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Old
Berliner Liquidating Trust
|
13,101,644 | - | 13,101,644 |
(9)
|
9.58 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sigma
Opportunity Fund, LLC
|
7,844,789 | - | 8,019,789 |
(10)
|
5.86 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C.
Scott Hisey, Director and Chief Executive Officer
|
1,200,000 | 1,000 | 4,076,350 |
(11)
|
2.92 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter
Giacalone, Executive Chairman
|
1,100,000 | 2,667 | 2,433,350 |
(12)
|
1.76 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ronald
J. Lejman, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
- | - | 400,000 |
(13)
|
* | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Daniel
Yannantuono, CEO DirectSat
|
75,000 | 172 | 721,825 |
(14)
|
* | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Christopher
Perkins, CEO FTS USA
|
- | - | 172,975 |
(15)
|
* | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas
Day, General Counsel and Secretary
|
30,696 | - | 165,696 |
(16)
|
* | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dean
MacDonald, Director
|
500,000 | 1,146 | 607,300 |
(17)
|
* | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mark
S. Dailey, Director
|
54,166 | - | 104,166 |
(18)
|
* | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richard
Siber, Director
|
- | - | - |
|
* | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raymond
A. Cardonne, Jr., former Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of
BCI
|
- | - | 50,000 |
(19)
|
* | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael
S. Guerriero, former Chief Operating Officer of BCI
|
- | - | 527,500 |
(20)
|
* | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter
Mixter, Former Director
|
25,000 | - |
75,167
|
(21)
|
* | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mehran
Nazari, Former Director
|
54,166 | - | 104,166 |
(18)
|
* | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John
Stevens Robling, Jr., Former Director
|
25,000 | - | 75,167 |
(21)
|
* | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thom
Waye, Former Director
|
7,844,789 | - | 8,019,789 |
(22)
|
5.86 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive
Officers and Directors as a
Group
(nineteen persons) (23)
|
124,731,881 | 237,976 | 143,006,065 |
(24)
|
92.23 | % |
- 63
-
*
|
Less
than 1%.
|
|
(a)
|
Address
is c/o HM Capital, 200 Crescent Ct, Suite 1600, Dallas, Texas
75201.
|
|
(1)
|
For
purposes of this column, a person is deemed to have beneficial ownership
of the number of shares of common stock and preferred stock that such
person has the right to acquire within 60 days of August 4,
2010. Percentages have been based on 136,778,330 shares of
common stock outstanding. For purposes of computing the
percentage of outstanding shares of common stock held by any individual
listed in this table, any shares of common stock that such person has the
right to acquire pursuant to the conversion of the Company’s Series B
Preferred, is deemed to be outstanding, but is not deemed to be
outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any
other person.
|
(2)
|
According
to a Schedule 13D filed on January 27, 2010, Sector Performance Fund is
the direct beneficial owner of 98,412,086 shares of common stock,
consisting of (i) 87,454,866 shares of common stock and
(ii) 10,957,200 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion
of 219,144 shares of Series B Preferred, each share of which is
convertible into 50 shares of common stock, subject to customary
structural anti-dilution adjustments for stock splits, dividends and
similar events, upon the option of the holder. Sector
Performance GP, LP, or Sector Performance GP, is the general partner of
Sector Performance Fund. As a result, Sector Performance GP may
be deemed to share beneficial ownership with respect to these
securities. Sector Performance LLC, or Ultimate GP, is the
general partner of Sector Performance GP and, as a result, Ultimate GP may
be deemed to share beneficial ownership with respect to these
securities. Except to the extent of any pecuniary interests,
each of Sector Performance GP and Ultimate GP disclaims the existence of
such beneficial ownership. A six-person committee (consisting
of Joseph Colonnetta, Peter S. Brodsky, Jason H. Downie, Edward Herring,
John R. Muse and Andrew Rosen) exercise, on behalf of Ultimate GP and
Sector Performance GP, voting and dispositive powers over the securities
held by Sector Performance Fund.
|
(3)
|
HM
Unitek Coinvest, LP, or Coinvest is the direct beneficial owner of
13,319,640 shares of common stock, consisting of 13,319,640 shares of
common stock. Ultimate GP is the general partner of Coinvest
and, as a result, Ultimate GP may be deemed to share beneficial ownership
with respect to these securities. Except to the extent of any
pecuniary interests, Ultimate GP disclaims such beneficial
ownership. A six-person committee (consisting of Joseph
Colonnetta, Peter S. Brodsky, Jason H. Downie, Edward Herring, John R.
Muse and Andrew Rosen) exercise, on behalf of Ultimate GP, voting and
dispositive powers over the securities held by
Coinvest.
|
(4)
|
SPF
is the direct beneficial owner of 6,217,924 shares of common stock,
consisting of (i) 5,525,574 shares of common stock, and (ii) 692,350
shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of 13,847 shares of
Series B Preferred. Ultimate GP is the general partner of SPF
and, as a result, Ultimate GP may be deemed to share beneficial ownership
with respect to these securities. Except for pecuniary
interests, Ultimate GP disclaims such beneficial ownership. A
six-person committee (consisting of Joseph Colonnetta, Peter S. Brodsky,
Jason H. Downie, Edward Herring, John R. Muse and Andrew Rosen) exercises,
on behalf of Ultimate GP, voting and dispositive powers over the
securities held by SPF.
|
(5)
|
No
securities are directly beneficially owned by Mr. Brodsky. Mr.
Brodsky holds a direct or indirect interest in Sector Performance Fund,
Coinvest, and SPF, collectively, the Investment Funds, which beneficially
own an aggregate of 117,949,650 shares of common stock on an as-converted
basis as explained in more detail below. Mr. Brodsky is an
executive officer and member of Ultimate GP. The aggregate
117,949,650 shares of common stock are comprised as follows: (i)
106,300,100 shares of common stock held by the Investment Funds, and (ii)
11,649,550 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of 232,991
shares of the Series B Preferred held by the Investment
Funds. Mr. Brodsky is a member of a six-person committee
(consisting of Mr. Brodsky, Joseph Colonnetta, Jason H. Downie, Edward
Herring, John R. Muse and Andrew Rosen) that exercises, on behalf of
Ultimate GP, voting and dispositive powers over the securities held by the
Investment Funds. No single member of the committee has sole
dispositive and/or voting power over the securities held by the Investment
Funds. Mr. Brodsky may be deemed to beneficially own all or a
portion of the shares of common stock beneficially owned by the Investment
Funds; however, Mr. Brodsky disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares
of common stock, except to the extent of any pecuniary interest
therein.
|
- 64
-
(6)
|
No
securities are directly beneficially owned by Mr.
Colonnetta. Mr. Colonnetta holds a direct or indirect interest
in the Investment Funds, which beneficially own an aggregate of
117,949,650 shares of common stock on an as-converted basis as explained
in more detail below. Mr. Colonnetta is an executive officer
and member of Ultimate GP. The aggregate 117,949,650 shares of
common stock are comprised as follows: (i) 106,300,100 shares of common
stock held by the Investment Funds, and (ii) 11,649,550 shares of common
stock issuable upon the conversion of 232,991 shares of the Series B
Preferred held by the Investment Funds. Mr. Colonnetta is a
member of a six-person committee (consisting of Mr. Colonnetta, Peter S.
Brodsky, Jason H. Downie, Edward Herring, John R. Muse and Andrew Rosen)
that exercises, on behalf of Ultimate GP, voting and dispositive powers
over the securities held by the Investment Funds. No single
member of the committee has sole dispositive and/or voting power over the
securities held by the Investment Funds. Mr. Colonnetta may be
deemed to beneficially own all or a portion of the shares of common stock
beneficially owned by the Investment Funds; however, Mr. Colonnetta
disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of common stock, except to
the extent of any pecuniary interest
therein.
|
(7)
|
No
securities are directly beneficially owned by Mr. Hopkin. Mr.
Hopkin is an officer of Ultimate GP; however, in that role, Mr. Hopkin has
no voting or dispositive power over the securities held by the Investment
Funds.
|
(8)
|
Represents
7,522,964 shares directly held by the Old Berliner Liquidating Trust, or
the Trust. The Trust owns 13,101,644 shares of common stock and
Mr. Berliner beneficially owns 57% of the Trust’s assets as a beneficiary
under the Trust.
|
(9)
|
The
Trust owns 13,101,644 shares of common stock. John X. Adiletta
is sole trustee of the Trust and has sole voting and dispositive power
over the securities held by the
Trust.
|
(10)
|
These
shares include (i) 4,489,795 shares of common stock held by Sigma
Opportunity Fund, LLC, or Sigma; (ii) 2,170,407 shares of common stock
held by Sigma Berliner, LLC, or SBLLC, an affiliate of Sigma; (iii)
1,334,587 shares of common stock, which includes 175,000 shares of common
stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants with an initial exercise
price of $0.55 per share, held by Sigma’s affiliate, Sigma Capital
Advisors, LLC, or Advisors, and (iv) 25,000 shares of common stock held by
Thom Waye. Advisors, Sigma Capital Partners, LLC, or Partners
and Thom Waye may be deemed to be indirect 5% owners of the Company by
virtue of Advisors being the managing member of Sigma, Partners being the
sole member of Advisors and Mr. Waye being the sole member of
Partners. Mr. Waye, Advisors and Partners have disclaimed
beneficial ownership of the shares owned by Sigma and SBLLC except to the
extent of their pecuniary interest therein. The address of
each of Sigma, SBLLC, Advisors, Partners and Mr. Waye is c/o Sigma Capital
Advisors, LLC, 800 Third Avenue, Suite 1701, New York,
NY 10022. Information related to Sigma in this footnote is
based upon the Schedule 13D filed by Sigma on March 2,
2010.
|
(11)
|
Mr.
Hisey is the direct beneficial owner of 1,250,000 shares of common stock
(on an as-converted basis), consisting of (i) 1,200,000 shares of
common stock, and (ii) 50,000 shares of common stock
issuable upon the conversion of 1,000 shares of Series B
Preferred. Also includes vested options to purchase 2,607,600
shares of common stock. 40% of these options become exercisable
only when the closing price per share of the common stock is equal to or
greater than $3.00 for twenty consecutive trading days on which at least
5,000 shares of common stock are traded, as reported on the principal
exchange on which the common stock is then traded. Also
includes warrants to purchase 218,750 shares of common
stock.
|
(12)
|
Mr.
Giacalone is the direct beneficial owner of 1,233,350 shares of common
stock, consisting of (i) 1,100,000 shares of common stock, and
(ii) 133,350 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of
2,667 shares of Series B Preferred. Also includes vested
options to purchase 1,200,000 shares of common stock. 40% of
these options become exercisable only when the closing price per share of
the common stock is equal to or greater than $3.00 for twenty consecutive
trading days on which at least 5,000 shares of common stock are traded, as
reported on the principal exchange on which the common stock is then
traded.
|
(13)
|
Represents
vested options to purchase 400,000 shares of common stock. 40%
of these options become exercisable only when the closing price per share
of the common stock is equal to or greater than $3.00 for twenty
consecutive trading days on which at least 5,000 shares of common stock
are traded, as reported on the principal exchange on which the common
stock is then traded.
|
- 65
-
(14)
|
Includes
(i) 75,000 shares of common stock, and (ii) 8,600 shares of common stock
issuable upon the conversion of 172 shares of Series B
Preferred. Also includes vested options to purchase 597,575
shares of common stock. 40% of these options become exercisable
only when the closing price per share of the common stock is equal to or
greater than $3.00 for twenty consecutive trading days on which at least
5,000 shares of common stock are traded, as reported on the principal
exchange on which the common stock is then traded. Also
includes warrants to purchase 40,650 shares of common
stock.
|
(15)
|
Represents
options to purchase 172,975 shares of common stock. 40% of
these options become exercisable only when the closing price per share of
the common stock is equal to or greater than $3.00 for
twenty consecutive trading days on which at least 5,000 shares of
common stock are traded, as reported on the principal exchange on which
the common stock is then traded. Also includes warrants to
purchase 5,000 shares of common
stock.
|
(16)
|
Includes
vested options to purchase 135,000 shares of common stock. Also
includes 30,696 shares of common stock held by the Trust for which Mr. Day
is the beneficiary. Excludes the remainder of the securities held by the
Trust, in which Mr. Day disclaims all beneficial ownership. Mr.
Day will be leaving our Company in September
2010.
|
(17)
|
Mr.
MacDonald is the direct beneficial owner of 607,300 shares of common
stock, consisting of (i) 500,000 shares of common stock, and
(ii) 57,300 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of
1,146 shares of Series B Preferred. Also includes vested
options to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock. 40% of these
options become exercisable only when the closing price per share of the
common stock is equal to or greater than $3.00 for twenty consecutive
trading days on which at least 5,000 shares of common stock are actually
traded, as reported on the principal exchange on which the common stock is
then traded.
|
(18)
|
Includes
54,166 shares of common stock and vested options to purchase 50,000 shares
of common stock.
|
(19)
|
Represents
options to purchase 50,000 shares of common
stock.
|
(20)
|
Represents
options to purchase 527,500 shares of common
stock.
|
(21)
|
Includes
25,000 shares of common stock and vested options to purchase 50,167 shares
of common stock.
|
(22)
|
Thom
Waye may be deemed to be an indirect owner of the shares held by Sigma by
virtue of Mr. Waye being the manager of Sigma. Mr. Waye has disclaimed
beneficial ownership of the shares owned by Sigma except to the extent of
his pecuniary interest therein. Includes 25,000 shares of common stock
owned directly by Mr. Waye.
|
(23)
|
Includes
Peter Brodsky, Joseph Colonnetta, Daniel Hopkin, Peter Giacalone, C. Scott
Hisey, Richard B. Berliner, Mark S. Dailey, Richard Siber, Dean MacDonald,
Daniel Yannantuono, Christopher Perkins, Ronald
J. Lejman, Raymond A. Cardonne, Jr., Michael S. Guerriero,
Peter Mixter, Mehran Nazari, John Stevens Robling, Jr., Thom Waye and
Nicholas Day.
|
(24)
|
Consists
of (i) 124,731,881 shares of common stock, (ii) 11,898,800 shares of
common stock issuable upon the conversion of 237,976 shares of Series B
Preferred, (iii) warrants to purchase 439,400 shares of common stock, and
(iv) vested options to purchase 5,935,984 shares of common
stock.
|
- 66
-
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS, DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The board
of directors has adopted a written policy regarding review and approval of
related party transactions. This policy calls for the board of
directors to appoint a committee of independent directors to review and approve
any related party transaction, which are defined as any transaction, or a series
of similar transactions, to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is to
be a party, in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any of
the following persons had, or will have, a direct or indirect material
interest:
|
·
|
Any
director or executive officer of the
Company;
|
|
·
|
Any
nominee for election as director;
|
|
·
|
Any
security holder who is known by us to own of record or beneficially more
than five percent of any class of our voting securities;
and
|
|
·
|
Any
member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing
persons.
|
Approval
of the committee reviewing the related party transaction is based on the
business needs of Company, the availability of alternative arrangements and the
costs of the proposed transaction versus these alternatives, if
available.
Pursuant
to the policy, related party transactions shall not include compensation
decisions within the authority of the Compensation Committee, such as officer
and director compensation. The independent committee will have the
authority to hire and consult with independent consultants, appraisers and/or
advisors to assist in their review of related party transactions.
In
addition, in connection with the Merger, on January 27, 2010, the board of
directors established a Special Committee composed of three directors, Richard
Berliner, Mark S. Dailey and Richard Siber. The Special Committee will
automatically dissolve on January 27, 2013. For so long as the Special
Committee exists, the Company may not take certain actions without the Special
Committee’s consent, including:
|
·
|
amending
or modifying the Charter or the Bylaws in a manner that would amend the
rights of the Series A Preferred or the Series B
Preferred;
|
|
·
|
issuing
additional shares of Series A Preferred or Series B Preferred Stock to an
Affiliated Party (as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement) (except
pursuant to the Credit Support Agreement, as defined in the Merger
Agreement);
|
|
·
|
making
certain changes or determinations with respect to the BMO Loan Documents
(as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement);
or
|
|
·
|
entering
into any transactions or amending certain agreements with affiliated
parties, including HM LLC (except for employment arrangements and benefit
programs approved by the board of directors or the compensation committee
of the board of directors).
|
During
the six months ended December 31, 2009, the Company did not engage in any
related party transaction that required review, approval or ratification under
the Company’s related party transaction review policies and
procedures. The Company did not engage in any related party
transaction where such policies and procedures were not followed.
Transaction
Subsequent to December 31, 2009
Amended
and Restated Monitoring and Oversight Agreement
In
connection with the Merger, on January 27, 2010, we, along with several of our
direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, entered into an Amended and
Restated Monitoring and Oversight Agreement, or M&O Agreement, with HM
Capital Partners I LP, or HM LP. HM, LLC, an affiliate of HM LP, and its
affiliates beneficially owned approximately 79% of the outstanding shares of our
common stock as of August 4, 2010. The M&O Agreement has been
modified as described below.
- 67
-
Pursuant
to the M&O Agreement, the Clients will pay HM LP an annual fee of $720,000
for calendar year 2010, $730,000 for calendar year 2011 and $754,000 for
calendar year 2012 and for each calendar year thereafter, in consideration for
HM LP’s provision of financial oversight and monitoring services to the Clients
as they may be requested from time to time. Each annual fee mentioned
above will be payable in equal quarterly installments on March 31, June 30,
September 30 and December 31 of the applicable year; provided, that such payment
will not be paid unless the Total Leverage Ratio (as such term is defined in the
First Lien Credit Agreement) is below 3.50:1.00 at the end of the applicable
quarter, and if not paid, each such payment will accrue until the Total Leverage
Ratio is below 3.50:1.00 at any subsequent quarter at which time all accrued and
unpaid payments will become due and payable. Further, to the extent any
amounts payable under the M&O Agreement are not permitted to be paid under
the First Lien Credit Agreement, such amounts will continue to accrue until the
earlier of the time at which such amounts are permitted to be paid under the
First Lien Credit Agreement or the termination of the First Lien Credit
Agreement in accordance with its terms, at which such time such amounts will
become due and payable.
Each of
the Clients have also agreed to indemnify HM LP, its affiliates, and their
respective directors, partners, officers, controlling persons, agents and
employees, collectively referred to as the Indemnified Persons, from and against
any and all claims, liabilities, losses, damages and expenses incurred by any
Indemnified Person (including those arising out of an Indemnified Person’s
negligence and reasonable fees and disbursements of the Indemnified Person’s
counsel) related to or arising out of (i) actions taken or omitted to be taken
by any of the Clients, (ii) actions taken or omitted to be taken by an
Indemnified Person with any Client’s consent or in conformity with any Client’s
instructions or any Client’s actions or omissions or (iii) HM LP’s engagement
that do not result primarily from the bad faith, gross negligence or willful
misconduct of such Indemnified Persons.
The
M&O Agreement expires upon the earlier of September 27, 2017 or a buyout of
the M&O Agreement. We are obligated to buy out the M&O Agreement
upon the first to occur of (1) any sale or distribution by the Company or our
subsidiaries to the public of our or their capital stock and, in connection
therewith, the capital stock of the Company or our subsidiaries becoming listed
on an established stock exchange or a national market system; (2) any
consolidation or merger of the Company with or into another entity or other
business combination or transfer of securities of the Company by any of its
stockholders or a series of transactions in which the stockholders of the
Company immediately prior to such transaction own less than 50% of the equity of
the Company or HM LLC or any fund or management company affiliated therewith
owns less than 25% of the equity of the Company; (3) any sale, license, transfer
or disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company; or (4)
the Special Committee’s approval of the Company buying out the M&O
Agreement.
Peter
Brodsky and Joseph Colonnetta, two of our directors, are Partners, and Daniel
Hopkin, also one of our directors, is a Vice President of HM LLC, which is an
affiliate of HM LP.
In
connection with the offering contemplated by this prospectus, the parties to the
M&O Agreement have agreed to terminate the M&O Agreement and pay a
termination fee of $4.3 million (payable in cash or stock, as described below)
that would only become payable once the following two conditions are
met:
|
·
|
The
Sector Performance Fund, which is an affiliate of HM LP, sells its entire
ownership stake in the Company, and
|
|
·
|
The
average price per share of common stock realized by the Sector Performance
Fund is above its basis, which basis will be calculated as of the closing
of this offering when the Series B Preferred owned by the Sector
Performance Fund converts into common stock. We and HM LP
expect that, depending on the sale price in this offering, the Sector
Performance Fund’s basis in its stock will be above the sale price in this
offering.
|
If the
two conditions above are met and the termination payment becomes payable, we
will be entitled to satisfy this obligation in either cash or shares of our
common stock, at our sole discretion. If payment is made in shares of
our common stock, the stock price would be calculated using the 20-day trailing
average share price as of the date that the two conditions above are met and the
termination payment becomes payable.
- 68
-
Credit
Support Agreement
Peter
Brodsky and Joseph Colonnetta are Partners and Daniel Hopkin is a Vice President
of HM LLC, which is an affiliate of Sector Performance Fund and SPF, or the
Credit Support Parties. Furthermore, Peter Brodsky and Joseph Colonnetta
are each executive officers of the ultimate general partner of each of the
Credit Support Parties and they each own an interest in such general
partner. Daniel Hopkin is an officer of the ultimate general partner of
each of the Credit Support Parties and owns an interest in the general partner
of Sector Performance Fund, our controlling stockholder.
Modification
to Conversion Terms of our Series B Preferred
Each
share of our Series B Preferred is convertible at any time, at the option of the
holder thereof, into shares of our common stock. According to its
terms, the number of shares of our common stock into which the Series B
Preferred is convertible is equal to the Series B original issue price ($50.00)
divided by $1.00, subject to standard structural anti-dilution adjustments for
stock splits, dividends and similar events. See “Description of
Securities – Description of Preferred Stock – Series B Preferred.”
In order
to help facilitate this offering by allowing for a simplified capital structure,
the holders of the Series B Preferred, which include Sector Performance Fund,
SPF, C. Scott Hisey, our Chief Executive Officer, Peter Giacalone, our Chairman
of the Board and President, Daniel Yannantuono, the Chief Executive Officer of
our DirectSat USA subsidiary, and Dean MacDonald, one of our directors, have
agreed to convert their stock into shares of our common stock upon the
consummation of this offering. As an inducement to agree to such
conversion, we agreed to modify the conversion price, while also giving effect
to the two-for-one liquidation preference, such that it will be a price
representing a 6.5% discount to the offering price to the public of the common
shares in this offering. The conversion will also be adjusted to give
effect to the proposed reverse split of the shares of our common stock on a
one-for- basis.
Nex-Link
USA, LLC
UniTek
USA and C. Scott Hisey, our Chief Executive Officer, jointly own and operate
Nex-Link USA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or
Nex-Link. Nex-Link is a joint venture formed by Mr. Hisey as a
disabled veteran-owned business enterprise for the purpose of supporting
customers requiring work to be completed by a disabled veteran-owned
entity. Mr. Hisey, a registered disabled veteran, owns 51% of the
membership units of Nex-Link. UniTek USA owns the remaining 49% of the
membership units of Nex-Link. Nex-Link’s assets were valued at
approximately $0.1 million as of December 31, 2009. Nex-Link generated
sales of approximately $0.7 million in 2009. Historically, Nex-Link has
distributed 100% of its net income to UniTek USA. Furthermore, UniTek USA
is a lender to Nex-Link pursuant to a revolving credit agreement, dated as of
July 2, 2008, or the Nex-Link Credit Agreement. Nex-Link’s current
principal outstanding under the Nex-Link Credit Agreement is approximately $0.2
million. Under the First Lien Credit Agreement, the maximum amount that
UniTek USA and its subsidiaries may lend to third parties, including Nex-Link,
is $1.0 million in the aggregate. No principal or interest payable under
the Nex-Link Credit Agreement was paid in our last fiscal year. Nex-Link’s
effective interest rate for our last fiscal year was based on the prime rate
published in the Wall Street Journal plus two percent. Mr. Hisey is
indemnified by Nex-Link for actions he takes as an owner, officer or director of
Nex-Link to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law.
- 69
-
DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES
The
following description of the material provisions of our common stock and
restated certificate of incorporation, as amended, and amended and restated
bylaws is only a summary, does not purport to be complete and is qualified by
applicable law and the full provisions of our Charter and
Bylaws.
Authorized
Capitalization
Our
authorized capital stock currently consists of 220,000,000 shares of capital
stock. The authorized capital stock is divided into common stock and preferred
stock. The common stock consists of 200,000,000 shares, par value $0.00002 per
share. The preferred stock consists of 20,000,000 shares, par value $0.00002 per
share, of which 1,317,602 are designated as Series A Preferred and 682,398 are
designated as Series B Preferred. As of August 4, 2010, we had
outstanding 136,778,330 shares of common stock and 265,237 shares of Series B
Preferred.
Description
of Common Stock
Voting. The holders of our
common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be voted on by
stockholders. The holders of our common stock are not entitled to cumulative
voting in the election of directors.
Dividends. Subject to the
rights of our outstanding preferred stock and subject to restrictions imposed by
our various credit agreements, dividends on our common stock may be declared and
paid when and as determined by our board of directors.
Liquidation, Dissolution or Winding
Up. If we liquidate, dissolve or wind up operations, the holders of our
common stock are entitled to share equally on a per share basis in any assets
remaining after all prior claims are satisfied, all our outstanding debt is
repaid and the liquidation preferences on our outstanding preferred stock are
paid in full.
Other Rights. Holders of our
common stock generally do not have any preemptive or similar rights to subscribe
for shares of our capital stock, or for any rights, warrants, options, bonds,
notes, debenture or other securities convertible into or carrying options or
warrants to subscribe, purchase or otherwise acquire shares of our capital
stock. Our Charter does not contain any provisions providing for the redemption
of our common stock or the conversion of our common stock into other
securities.
Effect of Preferred Stock and Credit
Facilities on our Common Stock. The rights, preferences and privileges of
holders of our common stock are subject to, and may be adversely affected by,
the rights of holders of any series of preferred stock that we may issue in the
future, and our credit facilities. Certain provisions of
the preferred stock that may adversely affect the rights of holders of our
common stock are described in the following paragraphs.
Description
of Preferred Stock
Our board
of directors has the authority, without further stockholder approval, to issue
up to 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series, to establish
the number of shares to be included in each such series, and to fix the
designation, powers, preferences and rights, and the qualifications, limitations
or restrictions, of the shares of each series. The issuance of preferred stock
could decrease the amount of earnings and assets available for distribution to
the holders of our common stock. In certain circumstances, such issuances could
have the effect of decreasing the market price of the common
stock. The board of directors has currently established two series of
preferred stock, the Series A Preferred and the Series B Preferred.
Each
share of the Series A Preferred was automatically converted into 50 shares of
common stock upon the filing and effectiveness of the amendment to our Charter
filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on June 4, 2010, or the Charter
Amendment.
- 70
-
Series
A Preferred
On
January 27, 2010, we filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware
a Certificate of Designation of Series A Stock designating 1,317,602 shares of
Series A Preferred with the following rights:
Rank. With respect
to the distribution of assets upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the
Company, the Series A Preferred ranks pari passu with the common
stock.
Dividends. The
holders of the Series A Preferred are entitled to participate in dividends paid
to the common stock on an as-converted basis.
Voting Rights. The
holders of the Series A Preferred are entitled to vote with the holders of the
common stock on an as-converted basis.
Automatic
Conversion. Each share of Series A Preferred was automatically
converted into 50 shares of common stock upon the filing and effectiveness of
the Charter Amendment.
Series
B Preferred
On
January 27, 2010, we filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware
a Certificate of Designation of Series B Stock designating 682,398 shares of
Series B Preferred with the following rights:
Rank. With respect
to the distribution of assets upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the
Company, the Series B Preferred ranks (1) senior to all classes of common stock;
(2) senior to all other series of previously authorized preferred
stock; (3) senior to any class or series of capital stock of the Company created
after the designation of the Series B Preferred, which does not, by its terms,
rank senior to or pari passu with the Series B Preferred, each a Junior
Security.
Dividends. The
holders of the Series B Preferred are entitled to participate in dividends paid
to holder of our common stock on an as-converted basis.
Liquidation
Rights. In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding
up of the Company, before any distribution is made to the holders of any Junior
Security, the holders of the Series B Preferred are entitled to be paid out of
the assets of the Company an amount equal to the greater of (1) $100.00 per
share of Series B Preferred (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends,
combinations or the like) plus any declared but unpaid dividends on the Series B
Preferred, and (2) the amount payable with respect to such shares of Series B
Preferred as if they had been converted into common stock.
Voting Rights. The
holders of the Series B Preferred are entitled to vote with the holders of the
common stock on an as-converted basis.
Optional
Conversion. Each share of Series B Preferred is convertible at
any time following the effectiveness of the Charter Amendment, at the option of
the holder thereof, into shares of common stock. The number of shares
of common stock into which the Series B Preferred is convertible is equal
to the Series B Preferred original issue price divided by $1.00, such that the
actual conversion ratio would currently be 50 shares of common stock for each
share of Series B Preferred, subject to standard structural anti-dilution
adjustments for stock splits, dividends and similar events, and to the
modifications described in the following paragraph. The terms of the
Series B Preferred do not contain any price-based anti-dilution
provisions. In the event of certain corporate changes, including any
consolidation or merger in which the Company is not the surviving entity, sale
or transfer of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, certain share
exchanges and certain distributions of property or assets to the holders of
common stock, the holders of the Series B Preferred have the right to receive
upon conversion, in lieu of shares of common stock otherwise issuable, such
securities and/or other property as would have been issued or payable as a
result of such corporate change with respect to or in exchange for the common
stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Preferred.
- 71
-
In order
to help facilitate this offering by allowing for a simplified capital structure,
the holders of the Series B Preferred have agreed to convert their stock into
shares of our common stock upon the consummation of this offering. As
an inducement to agree to such conversion, we agreed to modify the conversion
price, while also giving effect to the two-for-one liquidation preference, such
that it will be a price representing a 6.5% discount to the offering price to
the public of the common shares in this offering. Assuming a public
offering price of $ per share, the Series B
Preferred would convert into shares of
our common stock. The conversion will also be adjusted to give effect
to the proposed reverse split of the shares of our common stock on a
one-for- basis.
Protective
Provisions. The Company may not, without the prior approval
(by vote or written consent) of the holders of a majority of the then
outstanding shares of the Series B Preferred: (1) amend or waive any provision
of the Charter or Bylaws in a way that would alter the rights, preferences or
privileges of the Series B Preferred; or (2) create any capital stock having
rights, preferences or privileges senior to or on parity with the Series B
Preferred.
Election of
Director. The holders of the Series B Preferred shall be
entitled to elect one (1) member of the board of directors until such time as
the Series B Preferred represents less than five percent (5%) of the
then-outstanding shares of the common stock (including the preferred stock
voting on an as-converted basis), after which time the Series B Preferred shall
at no time thereafter be entitled to separately elect a member of the board of
directors.
Anti-Takeover Effects of Various
Provisions of Delaware Law and Our Charter and Bylaws
Delaware Anti-Takeover
Law. We are subject to Section 203 of the DGCL. Section 203
generally prohibits a public Delaware corporation from engaging in a “business
combination” with an “interested stockholder” for a period of three years after
the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested
stockholder, unless the interested stockholder attained such status with the
approval of our board of directors, the business combination is approved in a
prescribed manner or the interested stockholder acquired at least 85% of our
outstanding voting stock in the transaction in which it became an interested
stockholder. A “business combination” includes, among other things, a merger or
consolidation involving us and the “interested stockholder” and the sale of more
than 10% of our assets. In general, an “interested stockholder” is any entity or
person beneficially owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock and any
entity or person affiliated with or controlling or controlled by such entity or
person.
Restated Certificate of
Incorporation and Bylaws. Provisions of our Charter and our
Bylaws may delay or discourage transactions involving an actual or potential
change of control or change in our management, including transactions in which
stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares, or transactions
that our stockholders might otherwise deem to be in their best interests.
Therefore, these provisions could adversely affect the price of our common
stock. Among other things, our Charter and our Bylaws:
·
|
Authorize
the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock, the terms of which may be
established and shares of which may be issued without stockholder
approval;
|
·
|
Require
prior approval by the Special Committee of our board of directors of any
action which would amend or in any way modify our Charter or Bylaws, among
other actions; and
|
·
|
Establish
advance notice requirements for nominations for election to the board of
directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon at stockholder
meetings.
|
Listing
Our
common stock is listed on the OTCBB under the symbol
“UGLB.OB.” Concurrent with the consummation of this offering, we
expect that our common stock will trade on the NASDAQ Global Market under the
symbol “UNTK.”
Transfer Agent and
Registrar
The
transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is American Stock Transfer
& Trust Company.
- 72
-
MATERIAL
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
FOR
NON-U.S. HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK
The
following is a general discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax
consequences of the ownership and disposition of common stock by a beneficial
owner that is a “non-U.S. holder,” other than a non-U.S. holder that owns, or
has owned, actually or constructively, more than 5% of the our common stock.
This discussion addresses only the U.S. federal income tax considerations of
non-U.S. holders that are initial purchasers of our common stock pursuant to the
offering. For purposes of this discussion, a “non-U.S. holder” is a person or
entity that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is not a U.S.
person. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. person
includes:
|
·
|
an individual who is a citizen or
resident of the United
States;
|
|
·
|
a corporation, or other entity
taxable as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the
United States or of any political subdivision thereof;
or
|
|
·
|
an estate the income of which is
includible in gross income regardless of source;
or
|
|
·
|
a trust that (A) is subject to
the primary supervision of a court within the United States and the
control of one or more U.S. persons, or (B) otherwise has validly elected
to be treated as a U.S. domestic
trust.
|
If an
entity that is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes
holds common stock, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner will
generally depend on the status of the partner and upon the activities of the
partnership. Partnerships owning common stock and partners in such partnerships
should consult their tax advisers as to the particular U.S. federal income tax
consequences of owning and disposing of common stock.
This
discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
administrative pronouncements, judicial decisions and Treasury Regulations, all
as of the date hereof, changes to any of which subsequent to the date of this
prospectus may affect the tax consequences described herein. This discussion
does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be
relevant to non-U.S. holders in light of their particular circumstances and does
not address any tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, local or
foreign jurisdiction. Prospective holders are urged to consult their tax
advisers with respect to the particular tax consequences to them of owning and
disposing of common stock, including the consequences under the laws of any
state, local or foreign jurisdiction.
Dividends
Dividends
paid to a non-U.S. holder of common stock generally will be subject to
withholding tax at a 30% rate or a reduced rate specified by an applicable
income tax treaty. In order to obtain a reduced rate of withholding, a non-U.S.
holder will be required to provide an Internal Revenue Service Form W-8BEN, or
appropriate substitute form, certifying its entitlement to benefits under a
treaty.
Special
certification and other requirements apply to certain non-U.S. holders that are
pass-through entities rather than companies or individuals.
The
withholding tax does not apply to dividends paid to a non-U.S. holder who
provides an Internal Revenue Service Form W-8ECI, or appropriate substitute
form, certifying that the dividends are effectively connected with the non-U.S.
holder’s conduct of a trade or business within the United States. Instead, the
effectively connected dividends will be subject to regular U.S. income tax as if
the non-U.S. holder were a U.S. resident, subject to an applicable income tax
treaty providing otherwise. A non-U.S. corporation receiving effectively
connected dividends may also be subject to an additional “branch profits tax”
imposed at a rate of 30% (or a lower treaty rate).
Gain
on Disposition of Common Stock
A
non-U.S. holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on gain
realized on a sale or other disposition of common stock unless the gain is
effectively connected with a trade or business of the non-U.S. holder in the
United States or we are or have been a “U.S. real property holding company.”
Gain that is effectively connected with a non-U.S. holder’s U.S. trade or
business will be subject to regular U.S. income tax as if the non-U.S. holder
were a U.S. person, subject to an applicable treaty providing otherwise. A
non-U.S. corporation recognizing effectively connected gain may also be subject
to an additional “branch profits tax” imposed at a rate of 30% (or a lower
treaty rate).
- 73
-
Information
Reporting and Backup Withholding Requirements
Information
returns will be filed with the Internal Revenue Service in connection with
payments of dividends. A non-U.S. holder may have to comply with certification
procedures to establish that it is not a U.S. person in order to avoid
information reporting and backup withholding tax requirements with respect to
payments of dividends or a sale or disposition of common stock. The
certification procedures required to claim a reduced rate of withholding under a
treaty will satisfy the certification requirements necessary to avoid the backup
withholding tax as well. The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to
a non-U.S. holder will be allowed as a credit against such holder’s U.S. federal
income tax liability and may entitle such holder to a refund, provided that the
required information is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue
Service.
Recent
Legislation
Recent
legislation will generally impose, effective for payments made after December
31, 2012, withholding at a rate of 30% on dividends and the gross proceeds of a
disposition of common stock paid to certain foreign entities, unless various
information reporting and due diligence requirements are satisfied. The new
withholding regime will apply in conjunction with the existing rules described
in “—Dividends” and “—Information Reporting and Backup Withholding Requirements”
above. Non-U.S. holders should consult their tax advisers regarding the possible
implications of this legislation on their investment in the Company’s common
stock.
- 74
-
UNDERWRITING
Subject
to the terms and conditions in the underwriting agreement,
dated , 2010, by and between us and
Roth Capital Partners, LLC, or Roth, as the underwriter, has agreed to purchase
from us, and we have agreed to sell, on a firm commitment
basis, shares of common stock, at
the public offering price, less the underwriting discount set forth on the cover
page of this prospectus.
The
underwriting agreement provides that the obligation of the underwriter to
purchase all of the shares being offered to the public is subject to certain
conditions and the underwriter is obligated to purchase all of the shares of
common stock offered hereby if any of the shares are purchased.
Pursuant
to the underwriting agreement, we have agreed to indemnify the underwriter
against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, or
to contribute to payments which the underwriter or other indemnified parties may
be required to make in respect of any such liabilities.
Commissions
and Expenses
The
following table provides information regarding the amount of the underwriting
discounts and commissions to be paid to the underwriter by us. These amounts are
shown assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriter’s option to
purchase additional shares to cover over-allotments, if any.
Total
|
||||||||||||
Per Share
|
Without
Over-Allotment
|
With
Over-Allotment
|
||||||||||
Underwriting
discount
|
$ | $ | $ | |||||||||
Proceeds,
before expenses, to us (1)
|
$ | $ | $ |
(1)
|
Includes
payment to Roth of non-accountable expenses incurred in connection with
this offering in an amount equal to 1.5% of the gross proceeds
of the offering.
|
In
addition, we have agreed to reimburse the underwriter for certain out-of-pocket
expenses incurred by it up to an aggregate of $200,000 with respect to this
offering, in the event the offering is not consummated.
We have
agreed to sell the shares at the offering price less the underwriting discount
set forth on the cover page of this prospectus. We cannot be sure that the
offering price will correspond to the price at which our common stock will trade
following this offering.
Over-Allotment
Option
We have
granted the underwriter an over-allotment option. This option, which is
exercisable for up to 30 days after the date of this prospectus, permits the
underwriter to purchase a maximum
of additional shares from us to cover
over-allotments, if any. If the underwriter exercises all or part of this
option, it will purchase shares covered by the option at the public offering
price that appears on the cover page of this prospectus, less the underwriting
discount and non-accountable expense reimbursement of 1.5% of the gross proceeds
from the sale of such additional securities.
Lock-Up
Agreements
Our
executive officers, directors and certain of our significant stockholders have
agreed to a 180-day “lock-up” from the date of this prospectus relating to
shares of our common stock that they beneficially own, including the issuance of
common stock upon the exercise of currently outstanding options and options
which may be issued. This means that, for a period of 180 days following the
date of this prospectus, such persons may not offer, sell, pledge or otherwise
dispose of these securities without the prior written consent of the
underwriter, subject to certain exceptions. The lock-up period described in the
preceding sentence will be extended if (1) during the last 17 days of the
lock-up period, we issue an earnings release or material news or a material
event relating to us occurs, or (2) prior to the expiration of the initial
lock-up period, we announce that we will release earnings results during the
15-day period following the last day of the initial lock-up period, in which
case the lock-up period automatically will be extended until the expiration of
the 18-day period beginning on the date of release of the earnings results or
the public announcement regarding the material news or the occurrence of the
material event, as applicable, unless the underwriter waives, in writing, such
extension.
- 75
-
In
addition, the underwriting agreement provides that we will not, for a period of
180 days following the date of this prospectus, offer, sell or distribute any of
our securities, without the prior written consent of the
underwriter.
Stabilization
Until the
distribution of the securities offered by this prospectus is completed, rules of
the SEC may limit the ability of the underwriter to bid for and to purchase our
common stock. As an exception to these rules, the underwriter may engage in
transactions effected in accordance with Regulation M under the Exchange Act
that are intended to stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the price of our
common stock. The underwriter may engage in over-allotment sales, syndicate
covering transactions, stabilizing transactions and penalty bids in accordance
with Regulation M.
|
·
|
Stabilizing
transactions permit bids or purchases for the purpose of pegging, fixing
or maintaining the price of the common stock, so long as stabilizing bids
do not exceed a specified maximum.
|
|
·
|
Over-allotment
involves sales by the underwriter of securities in excess of the number of
securities the underwriter are obligated to purchase, which creates a
short position. The short position may be either a covered short position
or a naked short position. In a covered short position, the number of
shares of common stock over-allotted by the underwriter is not greater
than the number of shares of common stock that they may purchase in the
over-allotment option. In a naked short position, the number of shares of
common stock involved is greater than the number of shares in the
over-allotment option. The underwriter may close out any covered short
position by either exercising their over-allotment option or purchasing
shares of our common stock in the open
market.
|
|
·
|
Covering
transactions involve the purchase of securities in the open market after
the distribution has been completed in order to cover short positions. In
determining the source of securities to close out the short position, the
underwriter will consider, among other things, the price of securities
available for purchase in the open market as compared to the price at
which they may purchase securities through the over-allotment option. If
the underwriter sells more shares of common stock than could be covered by
the over-allotment option, creating a naked short position, the position
can only be closed out by buying securities in the open market. A naked
short position is more likely to be created if the underwriter is
concerned that there could be downward pressure on the price of the
securities in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect
investors who purchase in this
offering.
|
|
·
|
Penalty
bids permit the underwriter to reclaim a selling concession from a
selected dealer when the securities originally sold by the selected dealer
are purchased in a stabilizing or syndicate covering
transaction.
|
These
stabilizing transactions, covering transactions and penalty bids may have the
effect of raising or maintaining the market price of our securities or
preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of our common stock. As a
result, the price of our securities may be higher than the price that might
otherwise exist in the open market.
Neither
we nor the underwriter make any representation or prediction as to the effect
that the transactions described above may have on the prices of our securities.
These transactions may occur on any trading market. If any of these transactions
are commenced, they may be discontinued without notice at any time.
This
prospectus may be made available in electronic format on Internet sites or
through other online services maintained by the underwriter or its affiliates.
In those cases, prospective investors may view offering terms online and may be
allowed to place orders online. Other than this prospectus in electronic format,
any information on the underwriter’s or its affiliates’ websites and any
information contained in any other website maintained by the underwriter or any
affiliate of the underwriter is not part of this prospectus or the registration
statement of which this prospectus forms a part, has not been approved and/or
endorsed by us or the underwriter and should not be relied upon by
investors.
- 76
-
LEGAL MATTERS
The
validity of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus will be passed
upon for us by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the underwriter by Latham &
Watkins LLP, Costa Mesa, California.
EXPERTS
The
consolidated financial statements of UniTek Holdings, Inc. as of December 31,
2009 and 2008 and for the years then ended included in this prospectus and
registration statement have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in their report
thereon appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon such
report given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and
auditing.
The
consolidated financial statements of Berliner Communications, Inc. as of
December 31, 2009 and for the six month period ended December 31, 2009, and for
years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 incorporated by reference in this Prospectus
and in the Registration Statement have been so incorporated in reliance on the
reports of BDO Seidman, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
incorporated herein by reference, given on the authority of said firm as experts
in auditing and accounting.
INCORPORATION
BY REFERENCE
The SEC
allows us to “incorporate by reference” the information we file with it, which
means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you to
those documents. The information we incorporate by reference is an important
part of this prospectus. This filing incorporates by reference the following
documents, which we have previously filed with the SEC:
·
|
our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, filed
with the SEC on September 28,
2009;
|
·
|
our
Transition Report on Form 10-K for the transition period July 1, 2009 to
December 31, 2009, filed with the SEC on March 31,
2010;
|
·
|
our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 4, 2010,
filed with the SEC on May 18, 2010;
and
|
·
|
our
Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 27, 2010 (as
amended April 12, 2010), February 2, 2010, April 2, 2010, June 4, 2010,
July 12, 2010, July 22, 2010 and August 13,
2010.
|
Any
statement contained in a document that is incorporated by reference in this
prospectus will be modified or superseded for all purposes to the extent that a
statement contained in this prospectus modifies or is contrary to that previous
statement. Any statement so modified or superseded will not be deemed a part of
this prospectus except as so modified or superseded.
We will
provide without charge to each person, including any beneficial owner, to whom
this prospectus is delivered, upon written or oral request, a copy of any or all
of the foregoing documents incorporated herein by reference (other than exhibits
unless such exhibits are specifically incorporated by reference in such
documents). Requests for such documents should be made to us at the following
address or telephone number:
UniTek
Global Services, Inc.
1777
Sentry Parkway West
Gwynedd
Hall, Suite 302
Blue
Bell, Pennsylvania 19422
(267)
464-1700
Attention:
Ronald J. Lejman, Chief Financial Officer
You may
also access these documents through our website at www.unitekgs.com. The
information and other content contained on, or linked from, our website are not
and should not be considered a part of this prospectus.
- 77
-
WHERE
YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We are a
reporting company and file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy
statements and other information with the SEC. You may inspect and copy these
materials at the Public Reference Room maintained by the SEC at Room 100 F
Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for
more information on the Public Reference Room. You can also find our SEC filings
at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. You may also inspect reports and other
information concerning us at the offices of the Nasdaq Stock Market at 1735 K
Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006. We intend to furnish our stockholders with
annual reports containing audited financial statements and such other periodic
reports as we may determine to be appropriate or as may be required by
law.
Our
primary website address is www.unitekgs.com.
Corporate information can be located by clicking on the “Investor Relations”
link on the top of the home page, and then clicking on “SEC Filings” in the
menu. We make our periodic SEC reports (Forms 10-Q and Forms 10-K) and current
reports (Form 8-K) available free of charge through our website as soon as
reasonably practicable after they are filed electronically with the SEC. We may
from time to time provide important disclosures to investors by posting them in
the Investor Relations section of our website, as allowed by SEC’s rules. The
information on the website listed above is not and should not be considered part
of this prospectus and is intended to be an inactive textual reference
only.
- 78
-
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated
Financial Statements
Years
Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
Contents
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-ii
|
Audited
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
F-1
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
F-2
|
Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders' Equity
|
F-3
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
F-4
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-5
|
F-i
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of
Directors
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of UniTek Holdings, Inc. as
of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits
included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis
for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but
not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no
such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial position of UniTek Holdings, Inc.
at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of its
operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles.
As
discussed in Note 1, the Company has restated its statements of cash flows for
2009 and 2008.
/s/ Ernst
& Young LLP
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
April 12,
2010, except Notes 1, 22, 23, and 24, as to which the date is August 13,
2010
F-ii
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
December 31
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
2,263,278
|
$
|
5,348,133
|
||||
Restricted
cash
|
132,881
|
450,000
|
||||||
Accounts
receivable and unbilled revenue, net of allowances
|
24,679,947
|
26,944,879
|
||||||
Inventories
|
8,325,721
|
10,844,229
|
||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
3,803,787
|
2,437,089
|
||||||
Total
current assets
|
39,205,614
|
46,024,330
|
||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
20,665,487
|
13,597,175
|
||||||
Goodwill
|
137,827,554
|
171,703,472
|
||||||
Customer
contracts, net
|
26,563,731
|
42,823,469
|
||||||
Other
intangible assets, net
|
376,799
|
686,458
|
||||||
Deferred
tax asset, net
|
109,000
|
34,000
|
||||||
Other
long-term assets
|
7,092,952
|
7,145,721
|
||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
231,841,137
|
$
|
282,014,625
|
||||
Liabilities
and shareholders' equity
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
19,301,778
|
$
|
17,259,046
|
||||
Accrued
expenses
|
23,329,678
|
20,136,027
|
||||||
Current
income taxes
|
187,000
|
314,000
|
||||||
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
33,005,777
|
152,707,127
|
||||||
Current
portion of capital lease obligations and vehicle loans
|
5,097,245
|
784,836
|
||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
80,921,478
|
191,201,036
|
||||||
Long-term
debt, net of current portion
|
127,162,500
|
–
|
||||||
Capital
lease obligations and vehicle loans, net of current
portion
|
4,243,804
|
1,314,140
|
||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
–
|
4,831,457
|
||||||
Other
long-term liabilities
|
–
|
1,669,076
|
||||||
Total
liabilities
|
212,327,782
|
199,015,709
|
||||||
Shareholders'
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock $.01 par value (1,000 shares authorized, no shares issued
or outstanding)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Common
stock $0.01 par value (150,000,000 shares, authorized, 109,100,000 and
109,050,000 shares issued and outstanding)
|
1,091,000
|
1,090,500
|
||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
112,746,597
|
110,871,208
|
||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
60,642
|
(183,374
|
)
|
|||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(94,384,884
|
)
|
(28,779,418
|
)
|
||||
Total
shareholders' equity
|
19,513,355
|
82,998,916
|
||||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
$
|
231,841,137
|
$
|
282,014,625
|
See
accompanying notes.
F-1
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
Year Ended December 31
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
278,098,344
|
$
|
215,751,912
|
||||
Cost
of revenues
|
237,350,454
|
180,318,723
|
||||||
Gross
profit
|
40,747,890
|
35,433,189
|
||||||
Selling,
general, and administrative expenses
|
26,859,882
|
20,863,530
|
||||||
Asset
impairment
|
38,430,952
|
–
|
||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
26,878,027
|
21,270,188
|
||||||
Operating
loss
|
(51,420,971
|
)
|
(6,700,529
|
)
|
||||
Interest
income
|
–
|
82,271
|
||||||
Interest
expense
|
18,824,916
|
16,096,036
|
||||||
Other
expense, net
|
284,273
|
7,480
|
||||||
Loss
from continuing operations before income taxes
|
(70,530,160
|
)
|
(22,721,774
|
)
|
||||
Benefit
(provision) for income taxes
|
4,743,254
|
(4,503,457
|
)
|
|||||
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(65,786,906
|
)
|
(27,225,231
|
)
|
||||
Income
from discontinued operations (net of tax benefit of $0 and $453,000,
respectively)
|
181,440
|
4,034,275
|
||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(65,605,466
|
)
|
$
|
(23,190,956
|
)
|
||
Net
loss per share:
|
||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
(0.60
|
)
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
||
Diluted
|
$
|
(0.60
|
)
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
||
Weighted
average number of shares outstanding:
|
||||||||
Basic
|
109,096,154
|
108,834,615
|
||||||
Diluted
|
109,096,154
|
108,834,615
|
See
accompanying notes.
F-2
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders' Equity
Common Stock
|
Additional
Paid-in
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
|
Accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Income
|
Deficit
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2007
|
108,650,000
|
$
|
1,086,500
|
$
|
109,184,648
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
(5,588,462
|
)
|
$
|
104,682,686
|
||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
(23,190,956
|
)
|
(23,190,956
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
Currency
translation
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
(183,374
|
)
|
–
|
(183,374
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive loss
|
(183,374
|
)
|
(23,190,956
|
)
|
(23,374,330
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Capital
contributions
|
400,000
|
4,000
|
396,000
|
–
|
–
|
400,000
|
||||||||||||||||||
Stock
compensation expense
|
–
|
–
|
1,290,560
|
–
|
–
|
1,290,560
|
||||||||||||||||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2008
|
109,050,000
|
1,090,500
|
110,871,208
|
(183,374
|
)
|
(28,779,418
|
)
|
82,998,916
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
(65,605,466
|
)
|
(65,605,466
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Currency
translation
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
244,016
|
–
|
244,016
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive loss
|
244,016
|
(65,605,466
|
)
|
(65,361,450
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Warrants
issued in acquisition
|
–
|
–
|
137,500
|
–
|
–
|
137,500
|
||||||||||||||||||
Capital
contributions
|
50,000
|
500
|
49,500
|
–
|
–
|
50,000
|
||||||||||||||||||
Stock
compensation expense
|
–
|
–
|
1,688,389
|
–
|
–
|
1,688,389
|
||||||||||||||||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2009
|
109,100,000
|
$
|
1,091,000
|
$
|
112,746,597
|
$
|
60,642
|
$
|
(94,384,884
|
)
|
$
|
19,513,355
|
See
accompanying notes.
F-3
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(65,605,466
|
)
|
$
|
(23,190,956
|
)
|
||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities from
continuing operations:
|
||||||||
Income
from discontinued operations
|
(181,440)
|
(4,034,275
|
)
|
|||||
Provision
for doubtful accounts
|
602,779
|
2,678,743
|
||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
26,878,027
|
21,270,188
|
||||||
Asset
impairment
|
38,430,952
|
–
|
||||||
Deferred
financing cost amortization
|
2,196,746
|
1,698,295
|
||||||
Change
in fair value of collar
|
(121,413
|
)
|
1,264,143
|
|||||
Stock
compensation expense
|
1,688,389
|
1,290,560
|
||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(4,906,457
|
)
|
4,222,457
|
|||||
Loss
on sale of property and equipment
|
283,407
|
7,480
|
||||||
Interest
added to debt principal
|
2,021,150
|
1,345,938
|
||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable and unbilled revenue
|
979,210
|
(13,590,427
|
)
|
|||||
Inventories
|
2,022,807
|
(4,640,730
|
)
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
(1,253,134
|
)
|
(924,082
|
)
|
||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
2,502,548
|
7,729,324
|
||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities – continuing
operations
|
5,538,105
|
(4,873,342
|
)
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities – discontinued
operations
|
674,399
|
6,291,141
|
||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
6,212,504
|
1,417,799
|
||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities
|
||||||||
Acquisition
of property and equipment
|
(4,604,711
|
)
|
(2,785,901
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from sale of property and equipment
|
461,546
|
30,634
|
||||||
Cash
restricted for acquisition of business
|
317,119
|
(450,000
|
)
|
|||||
Cash
paid for acquisition of businesses
|
(6,625,793
|
)
|
(26,016,445
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(10,451,839
|
)
|
(29,221,712
|
)
|
||||
Cash
flows from financing activities
|
||||||||
Capital
contribution
|
$
|
450,000
|
$
|
400,000
|
||||
Proceeds
from revolving credit facilities, net
|
7,000,000
|
12,400,000
|
||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of long-term debt
|
–
|
19,700,186
|
||||||
Repayment
of principal on capital leases
|
(2,643,916
|
)
|
(881,365
|
)
|
||||
Repayment
of long-term debt
|
(1,560,000
|
)
|
(755,000
|
)
|
||||
Financing
fees
|
(2,209,919
|
)
|
(1,310,533
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
1,036,165
|
29,553,288
|
||||||
Effect
of exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents
|
118,315
|
(57,703
|
)
|
|||||
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(3,084,855
|
)
|
1,691,672
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
5,348,133
|
3,656,461
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$
|
2,263,278
|
$
|
5,348,133
|
||||
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the year for:
|
||||||||
Interest
paid
|
$
|
14,437,059
|
$
|
11,624,744
|
||||
Taxes
paid
|
$
|
259,689
|
$
|
12,066
|
||||
Significant
noncash items
|
||||||||
Fair
value of satellite markets provided
|
$
|
26,000,000
|
$
|
24,600,000
|
||||
Acquisition
of property and equipment financed by capital lease
obligations
|
$
|
579,394
|
$
|
200,186
|
See
accompanying notes.
F-4
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
1.
Background
Headquartered
in Blue Bell, Pennsylvania, UniTek USA, LLC (“UniTek”), is a premier provider of
high-quality, specialized infrastructure services including engineering,
construction management and installation fulfillment services to the
telecommunications, network services, broadband cable and satellite industries.
UniTek has created a scalable platform through which it can rapidly deploy a
highly skilled workforce of over 5,000 throughout 89 field offices across the
United States and Canada, delivering a comprehensive end-to-end suite of
technical labor services. Operations in Canada contributed $12,405,971 and
$6,614,944 in revenue in 2009 and 2008, respectively. As of December 31, 2009
and 2008, our long-lived assets for continuing operations located in Canada were
$2,571,444 and $501,455, respectively.
On
September 27, 2007, UniTek Acquisition, Inc. (“Acquisition”) purchased 100%
of the outstanding membership interests of UniTek USA, LLC. Acquisition is a
wholly owned subsidiary of UniTek Midco, Inc. (“Midco”). Midco has no
substantive operations, assets or liabilities. Midco is a wholly owned
subsidiary of UniTek Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings” or the
“Company”). Holdings is majority owned by an investment fund of HM
Capital Partners, L.P. (“HM Capital”). The acquisition was accounted for as a
business combination and the assets and liabilities of the acquired operations
were stated at fair value as of the acquisition date. The acquisition was
treated as a purchase with Acquisition as the accounting acquirer.
The
Company has adjusted its previously issued statements of cash flows for a
mathematical error within cash provided from operations on the statement of cash
flows. The adjustment has no impact on total cash flows from
operating activities but did impact the reported amounts of cash provided by
continuing operations and cash provided by discontinued operations. The
effect of the adjustment for this error is that cash flows provided by (used in)
operating activities - continuing operations changed from $6,232,268 to
$5,150,164 and from $3,195,208 to ($4,873,342) on the amounts previously
reported for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and
cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities - discontinued operations
changed from ($19,764) to $1,062,340 and from ($1,777,409) to $6,291,141 for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Certain cable operations that began during 2009 were discontinued
during the first quarter of 2010. The Company's 2009 financial
statements have been restated to classify the financial information of
these cable businesses as discontinued operations for financial reporting
purposes (see Note 22). The effect of this adjustment for the year ended
December 31, 2009 is that cash flows provided by operating activities -
continuing operations increased by $387,941 and cash flows provided by operating
activities - discontinued operations decreased by the same amount. These cable
operations did not exist during 2008.
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis
of Presentation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Holdings and the
accounts of its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities, amounts
contained in certain of the notes to the consolidated financial statements, and
the revenues and expenses reported for the periods covered by the financial
statements. Although such assumptions are based on management’s best knowledge
of current events and actions the Company may undertake in the future, actual
results could differ significantly from those estimates and assumptions. The
Company’s more significant estimates relate to revenue recognition, allowances
for bad debts, and valuation of goodwill and intangible assets.
F-5
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
In the
ordinary course of accounting for items discussed above, the Company makes
changes in estimates as appropriate and as the Company becomes aware of
circumstances surrounding those estimates. Such changes and refinements in
estimates are reflected in reported results of operations in the period in which
the changes are made and, if material, their effects are disclosed in the notes
to the consolidated financial statements.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and
cash equivalents include instruments with original maturities of three months or
less.
Accounts
Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Trade
accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear
interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of
the amount of probable credit losses in its existing accounts receivable. A
specific reserve for bad debts is recorded for known or suspected doubtful
accounts receivable. For all other accounts, the Company recognizes a general
reserve for bad debts based on the length of time receivables are past due and
historical write-off experience. Account balances are charged off against the
allowance when the Company believes it is probable that the receivable will not
be recovered.
Inventories
Inventories
consist primarily of materials and supplies purchased from the customer and used
for installation fulfillment services. Inventories are stated at the lower of
cost or market, as determined by the first-in, first-out or the
specific-identification method.
Prepaid
Expenses and Other Current Assets
Prepaid
and other current assets consist primarily of prepaid insurance, taxes and
expenses. These costs are expensed ratably over the related periods of
benefit.
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is generally calculated using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which
principally range from three to seven years for computers, construction
equipment, furniture, vehicles, and equipment. The useful life of leasehold
improvements is based on the shorter of the term of the lease or five years.
Assets under capital leases are amortized over the lesser of the lease term or
the asset’s estimated useful life. When assets are retired or disposed of, the
cost and accumulated depreciation thereon are removed and any resultant gains or
losses are recognized.
F-6
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
is subject to an assessment for impairment using a two-step, fair value-based
test with the first step performed at least annually, or more frequently if
events or circumstances exist that indicate that goodwill may be impaired. The
Company completes an annual analysis of the reporting units at the beginning of
the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. The first step compares the fair value
of a reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying
amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment test is
performed to determine the implied value of goodwill for that reporting unit. If
the implied value is less than the carrying amount of goodwill for that
reporting unit, an impairment loss is recognized for that reporting
unit.
The
Company amortizes intangible assets, consisting of customer contracts and
noncompete agreements from acquired businesses, on a straight-line basis over
the 12- to 60-month lives of those agreements (see Note 9).
Other
Long-Term Assets
Costs
associated with obtaining long-term debt are deferred and amortized to interest
expense on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest
method, over the term of the related debt (see Note 8). At
December 31, 2009 and 2008, $6,579,755 and $6,707,942 (net), respectively,
is included in other long-term assets related to deferred financing
fees.
The
Company reviews impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be
recoverable based on undiscounted estimated cash flows expected from its use and
ultimate disposition. Assets to be disposed of are reclassified to assets held
for sale at the lower of their carrying value amount or fair value net of
selling costs.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
The
Company utilizes derivative financial instruments to reduce interest rate risks.
The Company does not hold derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
All derivatives are accounted for at fair value. Changes in the fair value of
derivatives are recorded in earnings or other comprehensive income, based on
whether the instrument is designated as part of a hedge transaction and, if so,
the type of hedge transaction.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenues
from fulfillment services provided to the satellite and cable television markets
are recognized as the services are rendered. The Company recognizes revenue from
fulfillment services net of the satellite equipment because the Company
has determined that it acts as an agent.
F-7
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
The
Company also enters into contracts that require the installation or construction
of specified units within an infrastructure system. Under these contracts,
revenue is recognized at the contractually agreed price per unit as the units
are completed. Unbilled revenues represent amounts earned and recognized in the
period for which customer billings are issued in a subsequent period per the
contract terms.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other current
assets, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other current liabilities
approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of those instruments. The
carrying value of the capital lease obligations approximates fair value because
they bear interest at rates currently available to the Company for debt with
similar terms and remaining maturities. The fair values of debt and derivative
instruments are discussed in Notes 11 and 12, respectively.
Income
Taxes
The
Company follows the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes.
Income taxes consist of taxes currently due plus deferred taxes related
primarily to differences between the basis of assets and liabilities for
financial and income tax reporting. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
represent the future tax return consequences of those differences, which will
either be deductible or taxable when the assets and liabilities are recovered or
settled. Deferred taxes are also recognized for operating losses that are
available to offset future taxable income. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are reflected at income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred
tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in
tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted
through the provision for income taxes. A valuation allowance is recorded
against a deferred tax asset when it is determined to be more-likely-than-not
that the asset will not be realized.
The
Company provides an intra-period tax allocation of the income tax expense or
benefit for the year among continuing operations and discontinued
operations.
Leases
The
Company leases vehicles for performing fulfillment services in the satellite and
cable services divisions. Leases are accounted for either as operating or
capital depending on the terms of the lease. Each lease is reviewed as to the
terms and a determination is made whether the vehicle is an operating or capital
lease. Operating lease payments are expensed as incurred while payments on
capital leases are included on the consolidated balance sheet as a liability and
as a fixed asset.
F-8
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Stock-Based
Compensation
The
Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all share-based awards
made to employees and directors including employee stock options based on
estimated fair values.
The
consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31,
2009 and 2008 include stock option expense as compensation expense. Pretax
stock-based compensation expense recognized for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $1,688,389 and $1,290,560, respectively
(refer to Note 16 for additional information). For the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, all stock-based compensation expense was
included in selling, general, and administrative expenses in the consolidated
statements of operations.
Stock-based
compensation expense recognized for the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008 is based on the fair value of awards ultimately expected to vest, net of
estimated forfeitures. The Company estimates the fair value of stock-based
awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The Company values
stock-based awards using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and recognizes
compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service
periods. Stock-based compensation expense recognized during the current period
is based on the value of the portion of stock-based awards that is ultimately
expected to vest. The Company estimates forfeitures at the time of grant in
order to estimate the amount of stock-based awards that will ultimately vest.
Limited historical forfeiture data is available. As such, management has based
the estimated forfeiture rate on expected employee turnover. The Company records
the cash flows resulting from the tax deductions in excess of the compensation
cost recognized for those options (excess tax benefit) as financing cash
flows.
Reclassifications
Certain
reclassifications have been made to the prior-year financial statements to
conform to the current-year presentation.
Net
Loss Attributable to Common Shares
Basic net
loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number
of shares of common stock outstanding during the periods presented. Diluted net
loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number
of shares of common stock outstanding during the periods plus the dilution that
would occur upon the exercise or conversion of any instruments convertible to
common stock, such as stock options or warrants. At December 31, 2009
and 2008, no additional shares were dilutive to the computation because Holdings
reported a net loss for each of those years. Any outstanding stock
options, warrants, or other instruments that are convertible to common stock
could potentially be dilutive should Holdings report net income in a future
period.
F-9
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued
new guidance related to business combinations. This guidance retains the
fundamental requirements of existing guidance that the acquisition method of
accounting be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be
identified for each business combination. This guidance defines the acquirer as
the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business
combination and establishes the acquisition date as the date the acquirer
achieves control.
Additionally,
it requires contingent purchase price to be measured and recorded at its
estimated fair value on the date of acquisition. This guidance was effective for
the Company beginning January 1, 2009 and the impact of the adoption of
this guidance depends upon the nature and terms of business combinations that
the Company consummates on or after January 1, 2009.
On
January 1, 2009, the Company adopted new guidance on accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes. The new guidance provides a financial statement
recognition threshold and measurement attribute for a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company may recognize the tax benefit
from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax
position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based solely on
the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the
financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the
largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood to be sustained upon
ultimate settlement. The new guidance also covers the derecognition of income
tax assets and liabilities, classification of current and deferred income tax
assets and liabilities, accounting for interest and penalties associated with
tax positions, and income tax disclosures. The implementation of this standard
did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position
and results of operations.
In
January 2009, the FASB issued new guidance on disclosures about derivative
instruments and hedging activities. The guidance is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2008 and expands disclosure requirements about
an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities. The Company has
expanded its disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities
(see Note 12).
In
May 2009, the FASB issued new guidance on subsequent events. The standard
provides guidance on management’s assessment of subsequent events and
incorporates this guidance into accounting literature. The standard is effective
prospectively for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009,
and the Company adopted this guidance commencing with the December 31, 2009
consolidated financial statements. The implementation of this standard did not
have a material impact on our consolidated financial position and results of
operations.
F-10
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
In
June 2009, FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) was
issued, effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods
ending after September 15, 2009. The Codification supersedes literature of
the FASB, Emerging Issues Task Force and other sources. The Codification did not
change U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The implementation of this
standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated balance
sheet and results of operations.
3.
DirecTV Enterprises LLC/180 Connect Transaction
On
April 18, 2008, the Company entered into an asset purchase and exchange
agreement with DTV HSP Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of DirecTV
Enterprises, LLC (“DirecTV”), one of the Company’s significant customers. The
acquisition closed on July 8, 2008. The results were included in the
Company’s consolidated results beginning July 9, 2008. The agreement
required the Company to pay cash and transfer three of its satellite television
markets to DirecTV in exchange for 10 satellite television markets and a cable
television installation business formerly owned by 180 Connect, Inc. The
transaction allows the Company to develop additional market share and geographic
diversification in the satellite television services. The associated cable
business acquired in the transaction expanded the existing footprint in the
southwestern U.S. and diversified the scope of work offered. No preexisting
relationships were settled as part of this agreement.
Acquisition
of Business
The
Company has accounted for the asset purchase and exchange as a purchase of a
business. The purchase price was calculated as the sum of the cash paid, the
fair value of the satellite television markets transferred to DirecTV, certain
liabilities assumed in the deal and the related transaction costs. The purchase
price was allocated to the assets acquired from DirecTV based on their
acquisition date fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the fair
value of assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. The allocation of purchase
price has been adjusted for the final valuation of fixed assets, the actual
liabilities assumed in the transaction and the actual transaction
costs.
F-11
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
3.
DirecTV Enterprises LLC/180 Connect Transaction (continued)
The final
purchase price was calculated as follows:
Cash
paid
|
$ | 6,868,252 | ||
Fair
value of satellite markets provided
|
24,600,000 | |||
Transaction
costs
|
1,602,075 | |||
Total
purchase price
|
$ | 33,070,327 |
The final
price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as
follows:
Property,
plant and equipment
|
$ | 1,774,478 | ||
Other
assets
|
143,121 | |||
Site
closure costs and severance
|
(2,526,916 | ) | ||
Capital
leases and vehicle loans
|
(154,090 | ) | ||
Contracts
|
15,000,000 | |||
Goodwill
|
18,833,734 | |||
Net
assets acquired
|
$ | 33,070,327 |
In
connection with the acquisition of the cable business from DirecTV, the Company
developed a plan to close certain facilities and reduce personnel of the
acquired business in areas where the Company was not able to continue a
contractual relationship with the customer. In connection with the plan, the
Company established reserves in purchase accounting totaling approximately
$2.3 million. During 2008, the facilities were abandoned and all positions
were eliminated. The balance of the reserve at December 31, 2009 reflects
lease obligations associated expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet. A summary of the reserve activity related to the restructuring plan as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2009 is as follows:
Initial
Reserves
Recorded in
Purchase
Accounting
|
2008
Payments
|
Balance as of
December 31,
2008
|
2009
Payments and
Adjustments
|
Balance as of
December 31,
2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Severance-related
costs
|
$
|
49,000
|
$
|
49,000
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
–
|
||||||||||
Lease
exit costs
|
2,225,608
|
772,167
|
1,453,441
|
335,387
|
1,118,054
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
2,274,608
|
$
|
821,167
|
$
|
1,453,441
|
$
|
335,387
|
$
|
1,118,054
|
Discontinued
Operations
The
satellite television markets transferred to DirecTV met the definition of a
business and was treated as a disposal of a portion of a reporting unit. The
carrying value of contract assets and goodwill attributable to these markets was
determined by an allocation based on the relative fair values of the satellite
television markets being disposed of and retained by the Company. The difference
between the fair value and carrying value of the satellite television markets
transferred to DirecTV was $(871,417) and was recorded as a loss within
discontinued operations on the consolidated statement of
operations.
F-12
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
3.
DirecTV Enterprises LLC/180 Connect Transaction (continued)
As a
result of the asset purchase and exchange, the operations and cash flows
generated from the satellite television markets provided to DirecTV have ceased
for the Company. Accordingly, the Company has treated the operations of these
markets as discontinued operations on the consolidated statement of operations,
and the revenues, costs and expenses directly associated with these markets have
been classified as discontinued operations on the consolidated statement of
operations.
4.
2009 DirecTV Market Swap
On
February 1, 2009, the Company entered into an asset exchange agreement with
DirecTV, one of the Company’s significant customers. The exchange of satellite
installation sites was completed by April 1. The results of the acquired
business were included in the Company’s consolidated results beginning with the
timing of the transfer of each site. No cash was transferred as part of the
transaction. No preexisting relationships were settled as part of this
agreement.
Acquisition
of Business
The
Company has accounted for the asset exchange as a purchase of a business. The
purchase price was calculated as the fair value of the satellite television
markets transferred to DirecTV. The purchase price was allocated to the assets
acquired from DirecTV based on their acquisition date fair values. The excess of
the purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired was recorded as
goodwill. The allocation of the purchase price has been performed on a
preliminary basis and is subject to adjustment and finalization, which
management expects to complete during 2010.
The
results of the 2009 DirecTV swap are included in the consolidated results of the
Company effective at the date of the swap. During 2009, DirecTV markets received
in the swap contributed revenue of $37,171,299 and operating income of
$3,589,608 including depreciation and amortization.
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
4. 2009
DirecTV Market Swap (continued)
The
preliminary purchase price was calculated as follows:
Fair
value of satellite markets provided
|
$ | 26,000,000 | ||
Total
purchase price
|
$ | 26,000,000 |
The
purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as
follows:
Property
and equipment
|
$ | 192,534 | ||
Customer
contracts
|
9,800,000 | |||
Goodwill
|
16,007,466 | |||
Net
assets acquired
|
$ | 26,000,000 |
Discontinued
Operations
The
satellite television markets transferred to DirecTV met the definition of a
business and were treated as a disposal of a portion of a reporting unit. The
carrying value of contract assets and goodwill attributable to these markets was
determined by an allocation based on the relative fair values of the satellite
television markets being disposed of and retained by the Company. The fair value
of the satellite television markets transferred to DirecTV exceeded their
carrying value by $110,885 and was recorded as a gain within discontinued
operations on the consolidated statement of operations.
As a
result of the asset purchase and exchange, the operations and cash flows
generated from the satellite television markets provided to DirecTV have ceased
for the Company. Accordingly, the Company has treated the operations of these
markets as discontinued operations on the 2009 consolidated statement of
operations, and the revenues, costs and expenses directly associated with these
markets have been classified as loss from discontinued operations on the
consolidated statement of operations.
5.
Other Acquisitions
Acquisition
of Metro Cable Services, Inc.
On
September 30, 2009, the Company acquired substantially all of assets and
assumed certain liabilities of Metro Cable Services, Inc. (“Metro”), a company
that provides cable television installation services in the greater Dallas, TX
area, for a total purchase price of $2,767,917. The combination of the
acquisition and the Company’s existing business substantially expands the
Company’s presence in the greater Dallas and Ft. Worth, TX area. The purchase
agreement provides that the sellers will be paid either 375,000 shares or
$255,417, depending upon certain conditions. The purchase agreement also
contains provisions allowing the sellers to realize contingent purchase price
consideration of up to $250,000 in cash and 375,000 shares of common stock of
Holdings, contingent upon achieving certain sales levels. The fair value of the
contingent consideration of $512,500 has been included in the preliminary
purchase price. The intangible asset valued at $100,000 relates to a noncompete
agreement which is being amortized over 12 months. The amortization of
intangible assets and goodwill is deductible for tax purposes. The allocation of
purchase price has been performed on a preliminary basis and is subject to
adjustment and finalization, which management expects to complete during
2010.
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
5.
Other Acquisitions (continued)
The
preliminary purchase price was calculated as follows:
Cash
|
$ | 2,000,000 | ||
Cash
or shares
|
255,417 | |||
Contingent
purchase price consideration
|
512,500 | |||
Total
purchase price
|
$ | 2,767,917 |
The
preliminary purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed as follows:
Property
and equipment
|
$ | 134,492 | ||
Goodwill
|
403,718 | |||
Customer
contracts
|
2,200,000 | |||
Noncompete
agreement
|
100,000 | |||
Capital
lease obligations and vehicle loans – current
|
(32,826 | ) | ||
Capital
lease obligations and vehicle loans – long term
|
(37,467 | ) | ||
Total
net assets acquired
|
$ | 2,767,917 |
The
results of Metro were included in the consolidated results of the Company
effective September 30, 2009. During 2009, Metro contributed revenue of
$1,196,102 and operating income of $(94,994) including depreciation and
amortization.
Acquisition
of AMBB LLC
On
October 2, 2009, the Company acquired substantially all of assets and
assumed certain liabilities of AMBB LLC (“AMBB”), a company that provides cable
television installation services in the northeastern United States, for a total
purchase price $2,366,413. The acquisition expands the Company’s cable
installation operations into new geographical areas of the northeastern U.S. The
purchase agreement contains provisions allowing the sellers to realize
contingent purchase price consideration consisting of up to 250,000 warrants of
Holdings, contingent upon achieving certain sales levels. The acquisition date
fair value of the warrants of $137,500 has been included in the preliminary
purchase price. The intangible asset valued at $200,000 relates to a noncompete
agreement which is being amortized over 12 months. The amortization of
intangible assets and goodwill is deductible for tax purposes. The allocation of
purchase price has been performed on a preliminary basis and is subject to
adjustment and finalization, which management expects to complete during
2010.
F-15
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
5.
Other Acquisitions (continued)
The
preliminary purchase price was calculated as follows:
Cash
|
$ | 2,228,913 | ||
Contingent
purchase price consideration
|
137,500 | |||
Total
purchase price
|
$ | 2,366,413 |
The
preliminary purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed as follows:
Property
and equipment
|
$ | 1,109,769 | ||
Goodwill
|
455,352 | |||
Customer
contracts
|
1,500,000 | |||
Noncompete
agreement
|
200,000 | |||
Accrued
expenses
|
(22,464 | ) | ||
Capital
lease obligations and vehicle loans – current
|
(101,007 | ) | ||
Capital
lease obligations and vehicle loans – long term
|
(775,237 | ) | ||
Total
net assets acquired
|
$ | 2,366,413 |
The
results of AMBB were included in the consolidated results of the Company
effective October 3, 2009. During 2009, AMBB contributed revenue of
$2,410,549 and operating income of $(154,665) including depreciation and
amortization.
Acquisition
of C&C Communications, Inc.
On
November 16, 2009, Wirecomm Systems Inc. (a wholly owned Canadian
subsidiary of the Company) acquired substantially all of assets and assumed
certain liabilities of C&C Communications, Inc. (“C&C”), a company that
provides cable television installation services in the greater Toronto, Ontario
area for a total purchase price $1,807,897. The combination of the acquisition
and the Company’s existing business substantially expands the Company’s presence
in the greater Toronto area. The purchase agreement contains provisions allowing
the sellers to realize contingent purchase price consideration of up to $189,888
contingent upon achieving certain sales levels. The acquisition date fair value
of the contingent consideration of $186,090 has been included in the preliminary
purchase price. The intangible asset valued at $47,575 relates to a noncompete
agreement which is being amortized over 12 months. The amortization of
intangible assets and goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
5.
Other Acquisitions (continued)
The
allocation of purchase price has been performed on a preliminary basis and is
subject to adjustment and finalization, which management expects to complete
during 2010.
The
preliminary purchase price was calculated as follows:
Cash
paid to sellers
|
$ | 1,621,807 | ||
Contingent
purchase price consideration
|
186,090 | |||
Total
purchase price
|
$ | 1,807,897 |
The
preliminary purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed as follows:
Property
and equipment
|
$ | 120,879 | ||
Prepaid
expenses
|
47,622 | |||
Goodwill
|
830,621 | |||
Customer
contracts
|
761,200 | |||
Noncompete
agreement
|
47,575 | |||
Total
net assets acquired
|
$ | 1,807,897 |
The
results of C&C were included in the consolidated results of the Company
effective November 16, 2009. During 2009, C&C contributed revenue of
$631,098 and operating income of $30,752 including depreciation and
amortization.
Acquisition
of Nexlink Communications
On
June 20, 2008, the Company acquired substantially all of assets and assumed
certain liabilities of Nexlink Communications (“Nexlink”), a company that
provides engineering consulting, and construction management for the
telecommunications industry and cable installations, for a total purchase price
$6,920,316. This transaction enhanced the capabilities of the network services
division by providing complete end-to-end engineering, design and construction
services to its customers. The purchase agreement contains a provision allowing
the sellers to realize additional purchase price consideration of $750,000
contingent upon achieving certain sales levels. This contingency has been
resolved and fully earned as of December 31, 2009. The intangible asset
valued at $100,000 relates to a noncompete agreement which is being amortized
over 15 months. The amortization of intangible assets and goodwill is deductible
for tax purposes. The allocation of purchase price has been adjusted for the
final valuation of fixed assets, the actual achievement of purchase price
adjustment and the actual transaction costs.
F-17
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
5.
Other Acquisitions (continued)
The final
purchase price was calculated as follows:
Cash
paid to sellers
|
$ | 6,639,905 | ||
Transaction
costs
|
280,411 | |||
Total
purchase price
|
$ | 6,920,316 |
The final
purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as
follows:
Prepaid
expenses
|
$ | 128,768 | ||
Property
and equipment
|
727,826 | |||
Goodwill
|
3,936,997 | |||
Customer
contracts
|
2,400,000 | |||
Noncompete
agreement
|
100,000 | |||
Capital
lease obligations and vehicle loans – current
|
(124,425 | ) | ||
Capital
lease obligations and vehicle loans – long term
|
(248,850 | ) | ||
Total
net assets acquired
|
$ | 6,920,316 |
Acquisition
of Advanced Broadband System Services, Inc.
On
December 30, 2008, the Company acquired substantially all of assets and
assumed certain liabilities of Advanced Broadband System Services, Inc.
(“ABSS”), a company that provides cable television and broadband communications
consulting, construction management and cable installation services, for a total
purchase price of $4,622,134. The acquisition of ABSS reinforces the Company’s
infrastructure services division and allows the Company to become a full-service
provider to the telecommunications industry. The purchase agreement contains a
provision allowing the sellers to realize additional purchase price
consideration of $450,000 contingent upon achieving certain sales levels in
fiscal year 2009. The $450,000 amount was placed into escrow and included in
restricted cash in the December 31, 2008 consolidated balance sheet. The
actual sales level achieved in 2009 resulted in payment of $317,119 from the
escrow account. The intangible asset valued at $450,000 relates to noncompete
agreements, which are being amortized over 24 months. The amortization of
intangible assets and goodwill is deductible for tax purposes. The allocation of
purchase price has been adjusted for the final valuation of fixed assets, the
actual achievement of purchase price adjustment and the actual transaction
costs.
F-18
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
5.
Other Acquisitions (continued)
The final
purchase price was calculated as follows:
Cash
paid to sellers
|
$ | 4,367,119 | ||
Transaction
costs
|
255,015 | |||
Total
purchase price
|
$ | 4,622,134 |
The final
purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as
follows:
Property
and equipment
|
$ | 976,510 | ||
Goodwill
|
779,761 | |||
Customer
contracts
|
2,700,000 | |||
Intangibles –
noncompete
|
450,000 | |||
Capital
lease obligations and vehicle loans – current
|
(85,122 | ) | ||
Capital
lease obligations and vehicle loans – long term
|
(199,015 | ) | ||
Total
net assets acquired
|
$ | 4,622,134 |
Unaudited
Pro Forma Information
The
following unaudited pro forma data presents revenue and results of operations as
if the acquisitions of Metro, AMBB, C&C, the 2009 DirecTV swap, Nexlink,
ABSS and the DirecTV/180 Connect transaction had occurred on January 1, 2008 for
the year ended December 31, 2008, and the acquisition of Metro,
AMBB, C&C and the 2009 DirecTV swap had been completed as of January 1,
2009 for the year ended December 31, 2009 is as follows (in
thousands):
Year
Ended December 31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 295,552 | $ | 348,964 | ||||
Loss
from continuing operations before income taxes
|
$ | (69,465 | ) | $ | (22,321 | ) | ||
6.
Accounts Receivable and Unbilled Revenue
Accounts
receivable consists of the following:
December 31
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Trade
accounts receivable
|
$ | 19,583,622 | $ | 17,832,590 | ||||
Unbilled
revenue
|
6,425,484 | 11,224,870 | ||||||
Total
|
26,009,106 | 29,057,460 | ||||||
Less
allowance
|
(1,329,159 | ) | (2,112,581 | ) | ||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
$ | 24,679,947 | $ | 26,944,879 |
F-19
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
6.
Accounts Receivable and Unbilled Revenue (continued)
Activity
for the allowance account is as follows:
Year Ended December 31
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Allowances
at beginning of the year
|
$ | 2,112,581 | $ | 1,177,544 | ||||
Provision
|
602,779 | 2,678,743 | ||||||
Amounts
charged against allowances
|
(1,386,201 | ) | (1,743,706 | ) | ||||
Allowances
at end of the year
|
$ | 1,329,159 | $ | 2,112,581 |
Amounts
charged against the reserve primarily represent the write-off of trade accounts
and unbilled revenue which had been fully reserved previously.
7.
Property and Equipment
Property
and equipment consisted of the following:
December 31
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Vehicles
|
$ | 5,424,789 | $ | 5,617,300 | ||||
Computers
and equipment
|
5,723,963 | 3,201,300 | ||||||
Furniture
and fixtures
|
377,350 | 334,095 | ||||||
Construction
equipment
|
8,675,948 | 6,770,567 | ||||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
1,011,731 | 785,542 | ||||||
Assets
under capital leases
|
10,509,318 | 1,688,707 | ||||||
31,723,099 | 18,397,511 | |||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(11,057,612 | ) | (4,800,336 | ) | ||||
$ | 20,665,487 | $ | 13,597,175 |
Depreciation
expense, including amortization of assets under capital leases, was $6,827,042
and $4,162,361 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Property
and equipment includes gross assets acquired under capital leases of $10,509,318
and $1,688,707 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Amortization of
assets under capital leases is included in depreciation expense.
F-20
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
8.
Other Long-Term Assets
Other
long-term assets, net of accumulated amortization, consisted of the
following:
December 31
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Financing
fees, net
|
$ | 6,579,755 | $ | 6,707,942 | ||||
Refundable
deposits and other
|
513,197 | 437,779 | ||||||
Total
other long-term assets
|
$ | 7,092,952 | $ | 7,145,721 |
Financing
fees represent direct costs associated with the issuance of debt. Such costs are
amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the debt.
9.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The
following table summarizes the changes in the carrying amount of the Company’s
goodwill:
Year Ended December 31
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Beginning
balance
|
$ | 171,703,472 | $ | 174,078,695 | ||||
Goodwill
associated with acquisitions
|
17,697,157 | 21,722,417 | ||||||
Transfer
of satellite markets in DirecTV and 180 Connect
transactions
|
(21,031,502 | ) | (19,799,097 | ) | ||||
Impairment
of Telecom reporting unit
|
(32,369,648 | ) | – | |||||
Revision
of purchase price allocations
|
1,828,075 | (4,298,543 | ) | |||||
Ending
balance
|
$ | 137,827,554 | $ | 171,703,472 |
Accumulated
impairment at December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $32,369,648 and $0,
respectively.
F-21
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
9.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets (continued)
Other
intangible assets consisted of the following:
December 31
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Intangible
assets:
|
||||||||
Customer
contracts
|
$ | 70,467,827 | $ | 66,400,000 | ||||
Noncompete
agreements
|
1,025,047 | 949,722 | ||||||
Total
intangible assets
|
71,492,874 | 67,349,722 | ||||||
Accumulated
amortization:
|
||||||||
Customer
contracts
|
43,904,096 | 23,576,531 | ||||||
Noncompete
agreements
|
648,248 | 263,264 | ||||||
Total
accumulated amortization
|
44,552,344 | 23,839,795 | ||||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
$ | 26,940,530 | $ | 43,509,927 |
The
customer contracts are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the 28- to
60-month lives of those agreements. The noncompete agreements are being
amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 to 24 months. The Company recognized
amortization expense for intangible assets of $20,712,549 and $19,624,943 for
the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Estimated
aggregate amortization expense of intangible assets for each of the succeeding
years is as follows:
Year
ending December 31,
|
||||
$ | 13,221,714 | |||
2011
|
7,367,159 | |||
2012
|
5,739,152 | |||
2013
|
612,505 | |||
Total
|
$ | 26,940,530 |
The
Company performed its required annual goodwill impairment test as of
October 3, 2009 and determined that the carrying value of its telecom
reporting unit exceeded its fair value and was therefore impaired. The reduction
in the fair value of the telecom reporting unit was a result of expected
declines in revenue. The Company calculated the implied value of goodwill for
that reporting unit by performing a hypothetical purchase price allocation, and
determined that an impairment loss of $32,369,648 was
required.
F-22
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
9.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets (continued)
The
Company determined that the impairment of the Telecom reporting unit represented
an indicator of impairment over the other intangible assets and long-lived
assets of the reporting unit. Contracts of the Telecom reporting unit that were
assigned a value on the date they were acquired by the Company are treated as an
asset group for purposes of the long-lived impairment test. As a result, the
Company performed the required tests of recoverability for each asset group over
their lives and determined that the estimated undiscounted cash flows of its
customer contracts and noncompete agreements did not exceed their carrying
value. The Company calculated the fair value of these assets and determined that
an impairment loss of $6,061,304 was required to state the customer contracts
and the noncompete agreements at their fair values.
The
methods of determining the fair value of the Telecom reporting unit, the
customer contracts, and the noncompete agreements are discussed more fully in
Note 21. The impairment losses were recorded as a component of operating
loss in the Company’s 2009 consolidated statement of operations. No such
impairment losses were recorded during the year ended December 31,
2008.
10.
Accrued Expenses
Accrued
expenses consisted of the following:
December 31
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Accrued
compensation and benefits
|
$ | 4,154,829 | $ | 5,404,011 | ||||
Acquisition
liabilities
|
3,099,790 | 1,453,441 | ||||||
Accrued
subcontractor
|
1,473,844 | 2,635,051 | ||||||
Retention
payables
|
2,064,414 | 1,501,885 | ||||||
Accrued
insurance reserves
|
4,514,705 | 1,312,649 | ||||||
Accrued
litigation contingencies
|
2,130,957 | 772,914 | ||||||
Interest
rate collar
|
1,547,663 | – | ||||||
Accrued
expenses – other
|
4,343,476 | 7,056,076 | ||||||
Total
accrued expenses
|
$ | 23,329,678 | $ | 20,136,027 |
F-23
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
11.
Long-Term Debt
Long-term
debt consisted of the following:
December 31
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
First
Lien Credit Agreement:
|
||||||||
Revolving
credit facility
|
$ | 11,500,000 | $ | 4,500,000 | ||||
Term
B credit facility
|
75,502,500 | 77,062,500 | ||||||
Term
C credit facility
|
19,500,000 | 19,500,000 | ||||||
106,502,500 | 101,062,500 | |||||||
Second
Lien Credit Agreement:
|
||||||||
Term
facility
|
25,000,000 | 25,000,000 | ||||||
Holdings
revolving facility
|
28,665,777 | 26,644,627 | ||||||
Total
debt
|
160,168,277 | 152,707,127 | ||||||
Less
current portion
|
33,005,777 | 152,707,127 | ||||||
Long-term
debt, net of current portion
|
$ | 127,162,500 | $ | – |
Maturities
of long-term debt are as follows:
Year
ending December 31,
|
||||
$ | 33,005,777 | |||
2011
|
2,340,000 | |||
2012
|
124,822,500 | |||
Total
|
$ | 160,168,277 |
Term
Loan (First Lien)
The First
Lien Credit Agreement provides for a First Lien Revolving Credit Facility, a
First Lien Term B Credit Facility and a First Lien Term C Credit Facility. The
Company entered into two amendments with the First Lien debt holders in 2009.
The first amendment in June 2009 modified certain covenants in return for a
1% fee and an increase in the interest rate. The second amendment, in
December 2009, provided retroactive covenant relief for certain matters as
of December 31, 2008, modified certain financial covenants through
September 2012 pending meeting the required terms for closing the amendment
and provided forbearance through February 15, 2010 until certain terms were
met. These terms were met with an infusion of equity and the closing of an
acquisition in January 2010 that are discussed in
Note 24.
F-24
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
11.
Long-Term Debt (continued)
The
Revolving Credit Facility provides loans in a maximum amount of $20,000,000 and
matures on September 27, 2012. In connection with the closing of the
amendment in January 2010, the interest rate is, at the Company’s option, either
a rate of one-half of 1% per annum above the Federal Funds Rate plus 5.0% for
base rate advances or the Eurodollar rate plus 6% provided that the rate will
increase 75 basis points if the Company’s Leverage Ratio (as defined in the
Credit Facility) exceeds a certain level. Unused borrowings under the Revolving
Credit Facility are subject to a 1% commitment fee per annum. As of
December 31, 2009, the Company had drawn $11,500,000 on the revolver and
$2,975,000 of letters of credit were outstanding as of that date. Borrowings
under the Revolving Credit Facility are classified as long-term debt based on
the Company’s intent and ability to refinance the borrowing on a long-term
basis. Borrowings on the revolver are secured by the assets of the
Company.
The First
Lien Term B Credit Facility as amended is for $78,000,000. The Company did not
make any additions to the Term B credit facility in 2009. As of
December 31, 2009, $75,502,500 was outstanding under the First Lien Term B
Loan. The term loan provides for interest, depending on the Company’s election,
with interest at a rate of one-half of 1% per annum above the Federal Funds Rate
plus 5.5% or Eurodollar plus 6.5% at the Company’s option. At December 31,
2009 in connection with the closing of the amendment in January 2010, the
interest rate increases by 75 basis points if the Company’s Leverage Ratio (as
defined in the Credit Facility) exceeds a certain level. The First Lien Term B
loan is to be amortized from December 31, 2007 until maturity. The First
Lien Term B Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of the
Company.
Term
Loan (First Lien)
The First
Lien Term C Credit Facility is for $19,500,000 which is the outstanding balance
as of December 31, 2009. There were no additions to the Term C in 2009. The
Term C interest rate was amended to 16.25% on $8,000,000 of the Term C Credit
Facility for the period from April 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009 in
connection with the December 2009 amendment and 13.08% on the remaining
$11,500,000. Effective January 1, 2010, the interest rate on the $8,000,000
increased to 16.5%.
The First
Lien Credit Agreement as amended includes various financial covenants, the most
significant of which requires that the Company maintain certain quarterly
financial ratios and limits annual capital expenditures. The required quarterly
financial ratios become more restrictive to the Company over time. The Company’s
future compliance with quarterly financial ratios is dependent on the Company’s
ability to generate profits in excess of required amounts, which is subject to
the risks and uncertainties surrounding the Company’s business. With the closing
of the December 2009 amendment in January 2010, the Company was in
compliance with all covenants at December 31, 2009. The Company was not in
compliance with the terms of the First Lien Credit Facility at December 31,
2008 on the date of the original issuance of the financial statements;
accordingly, the debt has been reflected as a current liability at
December 31, 2008 in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet.
F-25
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
11.
Long-Term Debt (continued)
Term
Loan (Second Lien)
The
Second Lien Credit provides for a $25,000,000 Term facility that matures on
September 27, 2012 and is repayable in full at that date. The Company
entered into two amendments with the Second Lien debt holders in 2009. The first
in May modified certain covenants in return for a 1% fee and an increase in
the interest rate. The second amendment in December modified certain
financial covenants through September 2012 pending meeting the required
terms for closing the amendment. These terms were met with an infusion of equity
and the closing of an acquisition in January 2010 that are discussed in
Note 24. The interest rate at December 31, 2009 was the greater of
15.0% per annum and the Eurodollar rate plus 7.25%. The Second Lien amendment
included a change in the interest rate to a rate of the greater of 15.75% per
annum and the Eurodollar rate plus 7.25%. Interest is due quarterly beginning on
December 31, 2007 until maturity.
The
agreement includes various covenants, the most significant of which requires the
Company to maintain certain quarterly financial ratios and limits capital
expenditures. The Second Lien Term Loan Agreement is secured by substantially
all of the assets of the Company. With the closing of the December 2009
amendment in January 2010, the Company was in compliance with all covenants
at December 31, 2009.
Pursuant
to the terms of the Second Lien Credit Facility, the Second Lien Credit Facility
has also been reflected as a current liability at December 31, 2008 in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as a result of the First Lien debt not
being in compliance on the date of original issuance.
F-26
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
11.
Long-Term Debt (continued)
Holdings
Revolving Facility
Holdings
entered into a Loan Authorization Agreement dated as of September 25, 2007 with
BMO Capital Markets Financing, Inc. (“BMO”). The Loan Authorization
Agreement established an $18,000,000 revolving credit facility (the “Holdings
Revolving Facility”), and amounts borrowed against the facility are evidenced by
a promissory note. Interest is calculated based on the prime
commercial rate, as defined in the Loan Authorization Agreement. The
average interest rates during 2009 and 2008 were 7.25% and 5.5%,
respectively. Interest on the borrowings are payable quarterly, at
the option of Holdings, in cash or by adding such interest to the unpaid
principal balance of the facility. All interest incurred to date has
been added to the principal balance of the facility. Accrued and
unpaid interest was $3,665,777 and $1,644,627 at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The Holdings Revolving Facility and any unpaid interest
accumulated to date are payable and mature on demand of BMO. On March
24, 2008 and September 15, 2009, Holdings entered into amendments to the Loan
Authorization Agreement that increased the amount of maximum credit under the
facility to $28,000,000 and $35,000,000, respectively. The
obligations under the Loan Authorization Agreement are guaranteed by two funds
of HM Capital. There are no financial covenants included in the
Holdings Revolving Facility. The Holdings Revolving Facility is
not secured or guaranteed by any assets of Holdings' subsidiaries.
12.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The
Company manages interest rate exposure by using derivative instruments to reduce
the variability of interest payments for variable-rate debt. The Company is also
required to maintain interest rate hedge agreements covering a notional amount
of not less than 50% of the debt outstanding under the First Lien Credit
Agreement.
On
November 29, 2007, the Company entered into an interest rate collar
agreement with an aggregate notional principal amount of $65,000,000 and a
maturity date of November 30, 2010. The collar is used to hedge the
required portion of the Company’s First Lien Credit Agreement and consists of a
cap and a floor with a strike of 5.50% and 2.98%, respectively. The strike is
indexed to three-month LIBOR. The change in the fair value of the derivative is
reported as a component of interest expense. The amount of interest expense
recorded for the interest rate collar for the years ended December 31, 2009
and 2008 was $1,272,114 and $1,712,168, respectively, which includes changes in
the fair value of the collar liability. The fair value of the interest rate
collar liability was $1,547,663 and $1,669,076 at December 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively, and is recorded as a component of accrued expenses in the
consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2009 and as other long-term
liability in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31,
2008.
F-27
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
13.
Income Taxes
The
components of (benefit) provision for income taxes were as follows:
Year Ended December 31
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Federal:
|
||||||||
Current
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
–
|
||||
Deferred
|
(4,197,254
|
)
|
3,647,516
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
(4,197,254
|
)
|
$
|
3,647,516
|
|||
Foreign:
|
||||||||
Current
|
$
|
165,000
|
$
|
314,000
|
||||
Deferred
|
(74,000
|
)
|
(34,000
|
)
|
||||
Total
|
$
|
91,000
|
$
|
280,000
|
||||
State:
|
||||||||
Current
|
$
|
22,000
|
$
|
–
|
||||
Deferred
|
(659,000
|
)
|
575,941
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
(637,000
|
)
|
$
|
575,941
|
The
components of net deferred tax assets and liabilities are as
follows:
Year Ended December 31
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Gross
deferred tax assets:
|
||||||||
Net
operating losses
|
$
|
11,934,000
|
$
|
3,866,783
|
||||
Loss
on asset write-down
|
–
|
353,000
|
||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
12,278,000
|
7,410,957
|
||||||
Accrued
interest expense
|
1,158,000
|
823,000
|
||||||
Goodwill
|
6,324,000
|
–
|
||||||
Other
|
1,723,000
|
1,015,000
|
||||||
Total
gross deferred tax assets
|
33,417,000
|
13,468,740
|
||||||
Less
valuation allowance
|
(33,308,000
|
)
|
(13,434,740
|
)
|
||||
Net
deferred tax assets
|
$
|
109,000
|
$
|
34,000
|
||||
Gross
deferred tax liabilities:
|
||||||||
Goodwill
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
4,831,457
|
||||
Total
gross deferred tax liability
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
4,831,457
|
||||
Net
deferred tax liability
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
4,831,457
|
F-28
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
13.
Income Taxes (continued)
At
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had gross deferred income tax
assets of approximately $33,417,000 and $13,468,739, respectively, and gross
deferred income tax liabilities of $0 and $4,831,457, respectively, which result
primarily from federal and state net operating loss carry forwards, foreign tax,
reserve balances, and depreciation and amortization. Because the Company has not
yet achieved profitable operations, management believes the potential tax
benefits from the deferred tax assets do not satisfy the realization criteria
set forth in FASB ASC 740, and accordingly, has recorded a valuation allowance
of the entire gross tax asset.
For tax
purposes, goodwill is being amortized. In periods when the cumulative book basis
of goodwill exceeds the tax basis of goodwill, as the basis difference will not
reverse within the period that the deferred tax assets will reverse, a net tax
deferred liability is recorded in the consolidated financial
statements.
A
reconciliation of U.S. statutory federal income tax rate related to pretax
income (loss) from continuing operations to the effective tax rate for the years
ended December 31 is as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
U.S.
statutory federal rates applied to pretax loss
|
35.0
|
%
|
35.0
|
%
|
||||
Nondeductible
expenses
|
(1.2
|
)
|
(4.0
|
)
|
||||
State
income taxes net of federal benefit
|
3.6
|
5.8
|
||||||
Provision
to return adjustment
|
(1.2
|
)
|
(1.1
|
)
|
||||
Other
|
(1.6
|
)
|
2.0
|
|||||
Valuation
allowance on deferred tax assets
|
(28.0
|
)
|
(59.2
|
)
|
||||
Canada
impact
|
0.2
|
0.4
|
||||||
Effective
income tax rate
|
6.8
|
%
|
(21.1
|
)%
|
The
Company’s effective tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate due to
deferred state tax assets and liabilities and the Company’s valuation
allowance.
At
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had federal and state net operating
loss carry forwards of approximately $30,857,000 and $9,542,000, respectively,
which begin to expire in 2014 and are fully expired in 2029.
The
Company did not have unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2009 and
does not expect this to change significantly over the next 12 months. The
Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued on any unrecognized tax
benefits as a component of income tax expense. As of December 31, 2009, the
Company has not accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax
positions. The Company’s tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2007
through December 31, 2009 are still subject to examination by tax
jurisdictions.
F-29
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
14.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments that may potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit
risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents and contract receivables.
The Company maintains substantially all of its cash investments with what it
believes to be high-credit-quality financial institutions. As a policy, the
Company does not collateralize its receivables; however, if collectability
becomes questionable, appropriate liens may be filed.
The
Company’s three largest customers accounted for approximately 85% and 86% of its
consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The Company’s three largest customers accounted for approximately
64%, 13% and 8% of its consolidated revenues, respectively, for the year ended
December 31, 2009 compared to 53%, 21% and 12% of its consolidated
revenues, respectively, for the year ended December, 31, 2008.
At
December 31, 2009, accounts receivable, including unbilled revenue, due
from the Company’s four largest customers with respect to outstanding
receivables represented 26%, 23%, 17% and 16%, respectively, of the Company’s
total accounts receivable balance. No other customer represented 10% or more of
accounts receivable as of December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2008, the
Company’s two largest customers with respect to outstanding receivables
represented 61% and 20%, respectively, of the Company’s total accounts
receivable balance. No other customer represented 10% or more of accounts
receivable as of December 31, 2008.
15.
Shareholder’s Equity
At the
Company’s inception, the Board of Directors authorized 150,001,000 shares of
capital stock consisting of 1,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per
share and 150,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share. As of
December 31, 2009, the Company had 109,100,000 shares of common stock
issued and outstanding. There were no shares of preferred stock
issued or outstanding at December 31, 2009.
16.
Stock-Based Compensation
As of
December 31, 2009, a total of 17,881,250 shares of Holdings’ common stock
had been reserved for issuance under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2007
Plan”) including 396,449 shares remaining eligible for the grant of awards under
the plan.
Administration of the 2007
Plan. The 2007 Plan is administered by Holdings’ compensation committee
of the Board of Directors or by one or more committees of the Board of Directors
as designated. The administrator of the 2007 Plan and its authorized delegates
have the authority to select the persons to whom awards may be granted and to
determine: (i) the number, type and value of awards; (ii) the exercise price of
an award and the time when it may be exercised (the plan administrator may not
set the exercise price of an award lower than the fair market value of the stock
on the date of the grant); (iii) the method of payment of the exercise price;
and (iv) the other terms and conditions of awards.
F-30
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
16.
Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
Eligibility. Participation in
the 2007 Plan is limited to employees, directors and consultants. The plan
administrator, in its sole discretion, will determine which participants are
eligible to participate in the 2007 Plan.
Vesting and Performance
Objectives. An award under the 2007 Plan will become vested only if the
vesting conditions set forth in the award agreement (as determined by the plan
administrator) are satisfied. The vesting conditions include performance of
services for a specified period. In granting performance-based awards, which are
regulated by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, the plan administrator
is bound to follow the criteria established under the 2007 Plan. Generally,
options vest over a five-year period.
Reorganization Event. Upon a
change of control as defined under the 2007 Plan, all of the outstanding awards
shall immediately vest.
Term of the Plan. Unless
earlier terminated by the Board of Directors, the 2007 Plan will terminate on
September 25, 2017.
In 2009
and 2008, the Company considered the following methodologies in arriving at its
opinion as to the fair value of our common stock:
|
•
|
an estimate of the value of the
Company based on the values of publicly held companies with similar
businesses;
|
|
•
|
an estimate of the value of the
Company based on a discounted cash flow analysis, utilizing the present
value of anticipated future cash flows, discounted at an appropriate
discount rate reflecting the risk inherent in the investment;
and
|
|
•
|
allocation of our Company’s
equity value, as determined by reference to the above analyses, to our
outstanding classes of equity securities based on the relative risks,
preferences, and privileges of such
securities.
|
The
Company estimated the fair value of its common stock based on the values of
other publicly held companies engaged in similar businesses expressed as a
multiple of earnings.
F-31
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
16.
Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
For the
purpose of calculating the fair value of the Company’s stock options, the
Company estimates expected stock-price volatility based on a value calculated
using the historical volatility of an appropriate industry sector index. The
risk-free interest rate assumption included in the calculation is based upon
observed interest rates appropriate for the expected life of the employee stock
options. The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s intent not to
issue a dividend. The expected holding period is based on management’s best
estimate of the period over which the options will be held.
Stock-based
compensation expense recognized for the year ended December 31, 2009 was
based on awards ultimately expected to vest, net of estimated forfeitures.
Forfeitures were estimated based on management’s expectations as to the length
of time they expect to own the Company.
The
weighted-average fair value per share of stock options granted was $0.41 and
$0.55 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. There
were no stock options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2008.
The weighted-average, grant-date fair value of options granted was $657,194 and
$4,587,288 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
The fair
value of each option grant for the year ended December 31, 2009 was
estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with
the following assumptions:
Year Ended December 31
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Weighted-average
assumptions:
|
||||||||
Expected
volatility
|
63.03
|
%
|
58.08
|
%
|
||||
Dividend
yield
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
||||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
2.19
|
%
|
2.98
|
%
|
||||
Annual
forfeiture rate
|
4.00
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
||||
Expected
holding period (in years)
|
5
|
5
|
F-32
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
16.
Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
The
following tables summarize information for the options outstanding and
exercisable for the year ended December 31, 2009:
Options
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price Per
Share
|
Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2008
|
16,559,026
|
$
|
1.00
|
|||||||||||||
Granted
|
1,610,375
|
1.00
|
||||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(684,600
|
)
|
1.00
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2009
|
17,484,801
|
$
|
1.00
|
|||||||||||||
Options
expected to ultimately vest as of December 31, 2009
|
15,312,362
|
$
|
1.00
|
7.7
|
$
|
–
|
||||||||||
Options
exercisable as of December 31, 2009
|
4,739,445
|
$
|
1.00
|
7.7
|
$
|
–
|
As of
December 31, 2009, there was $5,488,000 of total unrecognized compensation
cost, which includes the impact of expected forfeitures related to unvested
stock-based compensation arrangements. That cost is expected to be recognized
over a weighted-average period of 3.3 years.
17.
Warrants
On
September 27, 2007, concurrently with the purchase of UniTek USA, LLC,
warrants were issued to purchase 5,000,000 shares of Holdings’ common stock with
an exercise price of $2.50. The warrants are immediately exercisable and have a
contractually agreed-upon 10-year term. The fair value of the warrants is
$1,350,000 and was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The
warrants were fully exercisable on the date of grant; accordingly, they have
been reflected as a cost of the transaction.
F-33
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
18.
Commitments and Contingencies
The
Company rents office space and equipment and trucks under noncancelable
operating and capital leases, certain of which contain purchase option terms.
Operating lease payments are expensed as incurred. During 2009, approximately
$8,158,028 of trucks previously treated as operating leases were converted to
capital leases by an amendment with the lessor. The future minimum lease
commitments for all noncancelable operating and capital leases as of
December 31, 2009 are as follows:
Capital
Leases
|
Operating
Leases
|
|||||||
Year
ending December 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
$
|
5,189,235
|
$
|
8,369,933
|
||||
2011
|
2,849,952
|
6,352,202
|
||||||
2012
|
1,161,372
|
4,382,416
|
||||||
2013
|
309,069
|
3,124,059
|
||||||
2014
|
–
|
836,430
|
||||||
Thereafter
|
–
|
107,549
|
||||||
Total
minimum lease payments
|
9,509,628
|
23,172,589
|
||||||
Less:
Amounts representing interest
|
168,579
|
–
|
||||||
Total
capital lease obligation recorded in balance sheet
|
$
|
9,341,049
|
$
|
23,172,589
|
Rent
expense was $3,631,271 and $2,532,150 for the years ended December 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively.
19.
Related-Party Transactions
The
Company maintains certain policies and procedures for the review, approval, and
ratification of related-party transactions to ensure that all transactions with
selected parties are fair, reasonable and in the Company’s best interest. All
significant relationships and transactions are separately identified by
management if they meet the definition of a related party or a related-party
transaction. Related-party transactions include transactions that occurred
during the year, or are currently proposed, in which the Company was or will be
a participant and in which any related person had or will have a direct or
indirect material interest. All related-party transactions are reviewed,
approved and documented by the appropriate level of the Company’s management in
accordance with these policies and procedures.
F-34
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
19.
Related-Party Transactions (continued)
In
conjunction with the September 27, 2007 transaction, the Company and HM
Capital entered into a Financial Advisory Agreement relating to the provision of
certain financial and strategic advisory services and consulting services.
Beginning on October 1, 2007, the Company entered into a Monitoring and
Oversight Agreement with HM Capital that provides for an annual base fee of
either $500,000 or an annual monitoring fee of 2.0% of the budgeted consolidated
annual EBITDA of UniTek Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries, whichever is
higher. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company paid
$696,781 and $686,139, respectively, in monitoring and oversight fees including
expenses.
Additionally,
the Monitoring and Oversight Agreement also provides for a financial advisory
fee equal to 1.5% of the purchase price for all subsequent transactions plus
reimbursable expenses. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the
Company paid $104,133 and $266,856, respectively, in such fees.
20.
Litigation
From time
to time, the Company is a party to various lawsuits, claims, or other legal
proceedings and is subject, due to the nature of its business, to governmental
agency oversight, audits, investigations and review. Such actions may seek,
among other things, compensation for alleged personal injury, breach of
contract, property damage, punitive damages, civil penalties or other losses, or
injunctive or declaratory relief. Under such governmental audits and
investigations, the Company may become subject to fines and penalties or other
monetary damages. With respect to such lawsuits, claims, proceedings and
governmental investigations and audits, the Company accrues reserves when it is
probable a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably
estimated. The Company does not believe any of the pending proceedings,
individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on its
consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial
condition.
F-35
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
21.
Fair Value Measurements
As
defined by ASC 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820), the fair value of an asset or
liability would be based on an “exit price” basis rather than an “entry price”
basis. Additionally, the fair value should be market-based and not an
entity-based measurement. SFAS No. 157 also establishes a fair value
hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. SFAS
No. 157 describes three levels of input that may be used to measure fair
value.
|
•
|
Level 1 – Financial
assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices
for identical assets or liabilities in an active market that the Company
has the ability to access at the measurement
date.
|
|
•
|
Level 2 – Financial
assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets
where trading occurs infrequently or whose values are based on quoted
prices of instruments with similar attributes in active markets. Level 2
inputs include the
following:
|
|
–
|
Quoted prices for similar assets
or liabilities in active
markets;
|
|
–
|
Quoted prices for identical or
similar assets or liabilities in non-active
markets;
|
|
–
|
Inputs other than quoted prices
that are observable for substantially the full term of the asset or
liability; and
|
|
–
|
Inputs that are derived
principally from or corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the asset or
liability.
|
|
•
|
Level 3 – Financial
assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation
techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant
to the overall fair value measurement. These inputs reflect management’s
own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in
pricing the asset or
liability.
|
F-36
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
21.
Fair Value Measurements (continued)
The
following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2009:
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Fair Value at
December 31,
2009
|
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets
(Level 1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
|
|||||||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
|
$
|
2,263,278
|
$
|
2,263,278
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
–
|
||||||||
Total
|
$
|
2,263,278
|
$
|
2,263,278
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
–
|
||||||||
Liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest-rate
collar
|
$
|
1,547,663
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
1,547,663
|
$
|
–
|
||||||||
Total
|
$
|
1,547,663
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
1,547,663
|
$
|
–
|
The
following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2008:
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Fair Value at
December 31,
2008
|
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets
(Level 1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
|
|||||||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
|
$
|
5,348,133
|
$
|
5,348,133
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
–
|
||||||||
Total
|
$
|
5,348,133
|
$
|
5,348,133
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
–
|
||||||||
Liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest-rate
collar
|
$
|
1,669,076
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
1,669,076
|
$
|
–
|
||||||||
Total
|
$
|
1,669,076
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
1,669,076
|
$
|
–
|
F-37
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
21.
Fair Value Measurements (continued)
The
following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a nonrecurring basis as of October 3, 2009, the date on which the
Company determined that certain assets of the Telecom reporting unit were
impaired:
Fair Value
|
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
|
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
|
|||||||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||||||||
Goodwill –
Telecom
|
$
|
32,670,235
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
32,670,235
|
||||||||
Customer
Contracts – Telecom
|
480,000
|
–
|
–
|
480,000
|
||||||||||||
Other
Intangibles – Telecom
|
18,672
|
–
|
–
|
18,672
|
||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
33,168,907
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
33,168,907
|
Derivatives
On
November 29, 2007, the Company entered into an interest-rate collar
agreement with an aggregate notional principal amount of $65,000,000. The collar
is used to hedge the required portion of the Company’s First Lien Credit
Agreement. The fair value of the interest-rate collar liability was $1,547,663
and $1,669,076 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company
utilized a present value technique to fair value each derivative contract. The
Company calculated the present value of future expected cash flows using a
discount rate commensurate with the underlying risk of the debtor.
Asset
Impairment
The
Company performed its required annual goodwill impairment test as of
October 3, 2009 and determined that the goodwill, customer contracts, and
certain other intangibles of its Telecom reporting unit were impaired as of that
date. The fair value of the goodwill was implied by calculating the fair value
of the Telecom reporting unit and subtracting from that the fair values of the
assets attributable to the reporting unit other than goodwill. The fair values
of the reporting unit, the customer contracts, and the other intangible assets
of Telecom were determined by estimating the future discounted cash flows
attributable to each, which was determined using the Company’s internal
operating forecasts, weighted-average cost of capital, and certain other
assumptions (Level 3 measurements). The fair values of the other assets
attributable to the Telecom reporting unit were calculated using observable
inputs (Level 1 or 2 measurements) and used only for purposes of calculating the
implied value of the Telecom reporting unit goodwill.
F-38
UniTek
Holdings, Inc.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2009
22.
Discontinued Operations
Discontinued
operations consist of the satellite markets provided to DirecTV as part of the
market swaps highlighted in Notes 3 and 4 and certain cable markets that
have been exited for various operations reasons. The following table summarizes
the results for our discontinued operations for the year ended December 31,
2009 and 2008:
Year Ended December 31
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
12,266,027
|
$
|
47,035,198
|
||||
Cost
of revenues
|
11,530,252
|
40,065,390
|
||||||
Gross
profit
|
735,775
|
6,969,808
|
||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
665,220
|
2,517,116
|
||||||
Operating
income
|
70,555
|
4,452,692
|
||||||
(Gain)
loss on sale of assets
|
(110,885
|
)
|
871,417
|
|||||
Income
from discontinued operations before income taxes
|
181,440
|
3,581,275
|
||||||
Tax
benefit from discontinued operations
|
–
|
453,000
|
||||||
Income
from discontinued operations
|
$
|
181,440
|
$
|
4,034,275
|
23.
Segment Reporting
We report
our financial results on the basis of two reportable segments: (1) fulfillment
and (2) engineering and construction. The fulfillment segment
consists of installation and other services for the television industry. This
reporting segment includes the satellite and cable operating segments of the
Company. The Company recognizes revenue from fulfillment services net
of satellite equipment as the Company acts solely as an agent. The
engineering and construction segment consists of engineering and construction
services for the wired telecommunications industry on a project
basis. The reporting segment includes the telecom operating segment
of the Company. Revenue is recognized based on the contractually
agreed price per unit as the units are completed.
The
Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on several
factors of which the primary financial measure is segment
EBITDA. Management believes segment operating income represents the
closest GAAP measure to segment EBITDA. Selected segment financial
information for the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 is
presented below:
Year Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2009
|
December 31, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Fulfillment
|
Engineering &
Construction
|
Total
|
Fulfillment
|
Engineering &
Construction
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$ | 238,656,428 | 39,441,916 | $ | 278,098,344 | $ | 148,463,541 | $ | 67,288,371 | $ | 215,751,912 | |||||||||||||
Cost
of revenue
|
200,326,193 | 37,024, 261 | 237,350,454 | 123,422,622 | 56,896,101 | 180,318,723 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
38,330,235 | 2,417,655 | 40,747,890 | 25,040,919 | 10,392,270 | 35,433,189 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
20,761,134 | 6,098,748 | 26,859,882 | 14,756,828 | 6,106,702 | 20,863,530 | ||||||||||||||||||
Asset
impairment
|
— | 38,430,952 | 38,430,952 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
17,144,224 | 9,733,803 | 26,878,027 | 11,305,876 | 9,964,312 | 21,270,188 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
$ | 424,877 | $ | (51,845,848 | ) | $ | (51,420,971 | ) | $ | (1,021,785 | ) | $ | (5,678,744 | ) | $ | (6,700,529 | ) | |||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
18,824,916 | 16,013,765 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
expense, net
|
284,273 | 7,480 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations before income taxes
|
$ | (70,530,160 | ) | $ | (22,721,774 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition
of property and equipment
|
$ | 4,110,563 | $ | 494,148 | $ | 4,604,711 | $ | 2,013,995 | $ | 771,906 | $ | 2,785,901 |
F-39
23.
Segment Reporting (continued)
At
December 31, 2009, the total assets of the fulfillment segment were $182,092,265
and the engineering and construction segment were $49,748,872. This
compares to $171,757,316 and $110,257,309 at December 31, 2008 for the
fulfillment and engineering and construction segment,
respectively. The increase of $10,334,949 in the fulfillment segment
was primarily from higher working capital. The decrease of
$60,508,437 on the engineering and construction segment compared to December 31,
2008 was primarily related to the impairment of long-lived assets in 2009 and
lower working capital.
At
December 31, 2009, goodwill of the fulfillment segment was $104,822,810 and the
engineering and construction segment was $33,004,745. This compares
to $107,808,637 and $63,894,835 at December 31, 2008 for the fulfillment and
engineering and construction segment, respectively. The decrease of
$2,985,827 in the fulfillment segment was primarily related to the 2009 DirecTV
swap. The decrease of $30,890,090 on the engineering and construction
segment compared to December 31, 2008 was primarily related to the impairment of
the telecom goodwill in 2009.
Our two
largest customers contributed accounted for 89% and 84%, respectively, of
revenue to the fulfillment segment in 2009 and 2008. Our largest two
customers contributed 83% and 84%, respectively, of revenue to the engineering
and construction segment in 2009 and 2008. No other customers
contributed more than 10% of segment revenue.
During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, DirecTV
contributed 64% and 44%, respectively, and Comcast contributed 13% and 14%,
respectively, to our total revenue to the fulfillment segment.
24.
Subsequent Events
On
January 26, 2010, HM Capital and certain other shareholders invested
$12.5 million of equity into Holdings for 12,500,000 shares of Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock of Holdings (“Holdings Series A”).
On
January 27, 2010, Holdings and HM Capital entered into an Agreement and
Plan of Merger with Berliner Communications, Inc. (“Berliner”). Berliner is a
public company trading on the OTC Bulletin Boards. Berliner services the
wireless telecommunications industry’s construction and site acquisition
markets. The terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger call for Holdings common
shares to be exchanged at a 1:1 ratio for Berliner common shares. In addition,
Holdings paid in full the $11,581,502 outstanding principal of the Berliner
senior credit facility with PNC Bank and the Company repaid $2.0 million of
the outstanding balance on its Term B Credit Facility. The PNC payoff was funded
by Berliner excess cash and the proceeds received from the issuance of Holdings
Series A shares.
For
accounting purposes, the Merger is treated as a reverse merger with the Company
being the accounting acquirer. Unaudited pro-forma information of the
Company assuming the Merger, and the related amendments to the Company’s debt
facilities, had been completed as of January 1, 2009 is as follows (in
thousands):
Revenues
|
$
|
347,511
|
||
Operating
loss
|
$
|
(58,624
|
)
|
|
Net
loss from continuing operations
|
$
|
(77,091
|
)
|
In
connection with the Berliner transaction, the Company entered into an Amended
and Restated Monitoring and Oversight Agreement (the “M&O Agreement”) with
HM Capital. Pursuant to the M&O Agreement, the Company will pay HM Capital
an annual fee of $720,000 for calendar year 2010, $730,000 for calendar year
2011 and $754,000 for calendar year 2012 and for each calendar year thereafter.
Each annual fee will be payable quarterly; however, no payment is due unless the
Company meets a total leverage ratio defined in the M&O Agreement. In the
event the ratio is not achieved, the annual fee will accrue until any subsequent
quarter in which the covenant level is exceeded at which time all accrued and
unpaid payments will become due and payable.
F-40
24.
Subsequent Events (continued)
In
conjunction with the Berliner transaction, the Company entered into a Credit and
Support Agreement with two funds of HM Capital that are parties to the guaranty
of the Holdings Revolving Facility. The Credit and Support Agreement
provides for the payment of a credit support fee for the continued guaranty of
the Company’s performance under the Holdings Revolving Facility. The
credit support fee is equal to 6% (or the maximum contract rate of interest
permitted by law if less than 6%) on the aggregate of the outstanding principal
and accrued interest added to the principal. The credit support fee
is payable quarterly in cash or, at the Company’s option in shares of Berliner
Series B Preferred stock.
On
March 31, 2010, the Company entered into a Senior Secured Letter of Credit
Facility arrangement (the “LOC Facility”), via an amendment to the First Lien
Credit Agreement, by and among the Company, Midco, certain subsidiaries of the
Company as guarantors, the initial lenders under the LOC Facility, Royal Bank of
Canada, as administrative agent and collateral agent for the lenders and HSBC
Bank Canada, as issuing bank for the letters of credit. The LOC Facility permits
the Company to draw from a $12,000,000 tranche added to the credit facility
established by the First Lien Credit Agreement. This tranche allows the Company
to issue letters of credit in support of the Company’s obligations under certain
insurance policies and other general corporate purposes. The LOC Facility
charges a 1.333% per month cash fee payable on issued but unfunded letters of
credit and a 1.0% per annum cash fee on the daily average unfunded amount of the
LOC Facility. Funded letters of credit will carry an interest rate of LIBOR plus
6.75% per annum with a 2.5% LIBOR floor.
On June
16, 2010, the Company entered into an amendment with the First Lien Debt Holders
to amend certain financial covenants.
On July
16, 2010, the Company amended its existing Term B Credit Facility to provide a
Third Incremental Term B Facility of up to $20,000,000. $15,000,000
of the facility was made available to the Company upon the closing of the
amendment. The additional $5,000,000 of the facility shall be
available to the Company as early as November upon the achievement of certain
EBITDA levels and covenant compliance as defined in the
amendment. The proceeds were used to reduce the existing balance on
the Revolving Credit Facility to support future working capital
needs. The Third Incremental Term B Facility currently bears interest
at the same rate as the prior Term B facility. Pursuant to the terms
of the amendment, the Third Incremental Term B Lenders received warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares of common stock of the
Company. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.01 per share,
vested 25% upon issuance, and the remaining warrants vest ratably through
September 1, 2012. The warrants contain a cashless exercise provision
and provide for anti-dilution adjustments in the case of reclassifications,
consolidations, mergers or sales that impact the Company’s common
stock.
F-41
Until
, 2010, all dealers that effect transactions in our common stock, whether or not
participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is
in addition to the dealers’ obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as
underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or
subscriptions.
Shares
UniTek
Global Services, Inc.
Common
Stock
PROSPECTUS
Roth
Capital Partners
, 2010
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN
PROSPECTUS
Item 13. Other Expenses of Issuance and
Distribution
The
following table sets forth all expenses, other than underwriting discounts and
commissions, payable by us in connection with the sale of the common stock being
registered. All of such expenses are estimates, except the fees payable to the
SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
Securities
and Exchange Commission registration fee
|
$ | 6,150.00 | ||
Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority fee
|
$ | 9,125.00 | ||
Stock
exchange fees
|
* | |||
Printing
and mailing expenses
|
* | |||
Legal
fees and expenses
|
* | |||
Accounting
fees and expenses
|
* | |||
Transfer
agent and registrar fees
|
* | |||
Miscellaneous
fees and expenses
|
* | |||
Total:
|
$ | * |
* To
be provided by amendment.
Item 14. Indemnification of Directors and
Officers
Section
102 of the DGCL allows a corporation to eliminate the personal liability of a
director to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach
of fiduciary duty as a director, except where the director breached his or her
duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, failed to act in good
faith, engaged in intentional misconduct or knowingly violated a law, authorized
the payment of a dividend or approved a stock purchase or redemption in
violation of the DGCL or obtained an improper personal benefit.
Our
Charter specifically limits each director’s personal liability, as permitted by
Section 102 of the DGCL, and provides that if it is hereafter amended to
authorize corporate action further eliminating or limiting the personal
liability of directors, then the liability of a director of the corporation
shall be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL as so
amended.
Section
145 of the DGCL provides, among other things, that a corporation may indemnify
any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any
threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding (other than an
action by or in the right of the corporation) by reason of the fact that the
person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or
is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer,
employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or
other enterprise, against expenses, including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines
and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by the person in
connection with the action, suit or proceeding. The power to indemnify applies
if such person acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be
in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and with respect to
any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his
conduct was unlawful. The power to indemnify applies to actions brought by or in
the right of the corporation as well, but only to the extent of expenses
(including attorneys’ fees, but excluding amounts paid in settlement) actually
and reasonably incurred and not to any satisfaction of judgment or settlement of
the claim itself, and with the further limitation that in such actions no
indemnification will be made in the event of any adjudication of liability on
the part of a person to the corporation, unless a court believes that in view of
all the circumstances indemnification should apply. Our Charter provides for
indemnification of our directors, officers, employees and agents to the fullest
extent permitted by the DGCL.
II-1
Our
Bylaws also provide that we will indemnify our directors, officers, employees
and agents to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL against all expenses,
liability and loss (including attorneys’ fees judgments, fines, special excise
taxes or penalties on amounts paid or to be paid in settlement) reasonably
incurred or suffered by such person in connection therewith, including the right
to require advancement by us of attorneys’ fees and other expenses incurred in
defending any such proceeding in advance of its final disposition, provided that
we receive an undertaking from such person to repay all amounts so advanced if
it is ultimately determined that such person is not entitled to be indemnified.
We have entered into agreements with certain of our directors and executive
officers, which provide for indemnification of such persons in their capacities
of director and/or officer, and we maintain a directors’ and executive officers’
liability insurance policy as permitted by our Charter and Bylaws.
Insofar
as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be
permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling the registrant pursuant
to the foregoing provisions, the registrant has been informed that, in the
opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed
in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
In
addition, following the Merger, the Company entered into indemnification
agreements, or the D&O Indemnification Agreements with our directors and
certain executive officers (Messrs. Berliner, Dailey, Giacalone, Hisey, Brodsky,
MacDonald, Siber, Yannantuono, Perkins, Lejman, Day, Hopkin and Colonnetta),
whereby the Company agreed to indemnify them, to the fullest extent permitted
under Delaware law, against all expenses, judgments, costs, fines and amounts
paid in settlement actually incurred by the directors in connection with any
civil, criminal, administrative or investigative action brought against the
directors by reason of their relationship with the Company. The D&O
Indemnification Agreements provide for indemnification rights regarding
third-party claims and in certain circumstances, proceedings brought by or in
the right of the Company. In addition, the D&O Indemnification Agreements
provide for the advancement of expenses incurred in connection with any
proceeding covered by the D&O Indemnification Agreements, as permitted by
Delaware law.
Also,
following the Merger, the Company and its subsidiaries entered into an
indemnification priority agreement with HM LLC to clarify the priority of
advancement of expenses and indemnification obligations among the Company, our
subsidiaries and any directors appointed by HM LLC and other related
matters.
Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered
Securities
Pursuant
to the Merger Agreement, we issued 1,317,602 shares of Series A Preferred,
250,005 shares of Series B Preferred and 43,920,000 shares of our common stock
to the UniTek stockholders. The offer and sale of these shares in connection
with the Merger Agreement were made in reliance on an exemption from
registration under the Securities Act, pursuant to Section 4(2)
thereof.
On July
16, 2010, we amended our existing Term B Credit Facility to provide a Third
Incremental Term B Facility of up to $20.0 million. Upon closing of
the amendment, $15.0 million of the facility was made available to us. The
additional $5.0 million of the facility shall be available to us as early as
November upon the achievement of certain EBITDA levels and covenant compliance
as defined in the amendment. The proceeds were used to reduce the
existing balance on the Revolving Credit Facility to support future working
capital needs. The Third Incremental Term B Facility currently bears
interest at the same rate as the prior Term B Credit
Facility. Pursuant to the terms of the amendment, the lenders under
the Third Incremental Term B Facility received warrants to purchase an aggregate
of 3,000,000 shares of our common stock. The warrants have an
exercise price of $0.01 per share, vested 25% upon issuance, and the remaining
warrants vest ratably through September 1, 2012. The warrants contain
a cashless exercise provision and provide for anti-dilution adjustments in the
case of reclassifications, consolidations, mergers or sales that impact our
common stock. The offer and sale of these warrants were made in reliance on an
exemption from registration under the Securities Act, pursuant to Section 4(2)
thereof.
Item
16. Exhibits
*1.1
|
Form
of Underwriting Agreement
|
|
2.1
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 27, 2010, by and among Berliner
Communications, Inc., BCI East, Inc., Richard Berliner (as Parent
Representative), HM Capital Partners LLC (as Company Representative) and
Unitek Holdings, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27,
2010)
|
II-2
3.1
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Berliner Communications,
Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2010)
|
|
3.2
|
Certificate
of Designation for the Berliner Series A Preferred Stock of Berliner
Communications, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2010)
|
|
3.3
|
Certificate
of Designation for the Berliner Series B Preferred Stock of Berliner
Communications, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2010)
|
|
3.4
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws of Berliner Communications, Inc. (Incorporated herein
by reference from Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January
27, 2010)
|
|
4.1
|
Registration
Rights Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2010, by and between Berliner
Communications, Inc. and those holders of capital stock of Berliner listed
on Exhibit A thereto (Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2010)
|
|
4.2
|
Voting
Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2010, by and among Berliner
Communications, Inc., HM Capital Partners, LLC, and those holders of
capital stock of Berliner listed on Exhibit A thereto (Incorporated herein
by reference from Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January
27, 2010)
|
|
4.3
|
Form
of Substitute Option (Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2010)
|
|
4.4
|
Form
of Substitute Warrant (Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2010)
|
|
4.5
|
Form
of Warrant (Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on July 22, 2010)
|
|
4.6
|
Amendment
No. 1 to Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 16, 2010
(Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed on July 22, 2010)
|
|
*5.1
|
Opinion
of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
|
|
10.1
|
Credit
Support Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2010, by and among Sector
Performance Fund, LP, SPF SBS LP, Unitek Holdings, Inc. and Berliner
Communications, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2010)
|
|
#10.2.1
|
Employment
Agreement, dated as of July 5, 2009, by and between Unitek USA, LLC and
Peter Giacalone (Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2010)
|
|
#10.2.2
|
Amendment
to Employment Agreement, dated as of December 23, 2009, by and between
Unitek USA, LLC and Peter Giacalone (Incorporated herein by reference from
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27,
2010)
|
|
#10.3.1
|
Employment
Agreement, dated as of July 5, 2009, by and between Unitek USA, LLC and C.
Scott Hisey (Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2010)
|
|
#10.3.2
|
Amendment
to Employment Agreement, dated as of December 23, 2009, by and between
Unitek USA, LLC and C. Scott Hisey (Incorporated herein by reference from
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27,
2010)
|
II-3
#10.4.1
|
Employment
Agreement, dated as of July 5, 2009, by and between Unitek USA, LLC and
Ronald J. Lejman (Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2010)
|
|
#10.4.2
|
Amendment
to Employment Agreement, dated as of December 23, 2009, by and between
Unitek USA, LLC and Ronald J. Lejman (Incorporated herein by reference
from Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27,
2010)
|
|
#10.5
|
Amendment
to Employment Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2010, by and between
Berliner Communications, Inc. and Richard Berliner (Incorporated herein by
reference from Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27,
2010)
|
|
#10.6
|
Amendment
to Employment Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2010, by and between
Berliner Communications, Inc. and Robert Bradley (Incorporated herein by
reference from Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27,
2010)
|
|
#10.7.1
|
Amendment
to Employment Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2010, by and between
Berliner Communications, Inc. and Michael S. Guerriero (Incorporated
herein by reference from Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
January 27, 2010)
|
|
#10.7.2
|
Amendment
No. 2 to Employment Agreement, dated as of July 9, 2010, by and between
Berliner Communications, Inc. and Michael S. Guerriero (Incorporated
herein by reference from Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
July 12, 2010)
|
|
#10.8
|
Amendment
to Employment Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2010, by and between
Berliner Communications, Inc. and Nicholas Day (Incorporated herein by
reference from Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27,
2010)
|
|
#10.9
|
Amendment
to Employment Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2010, by and between
Berliner Communications, Inc. and Raymond A. Cardonne, Jr. (Incorporated
herein by reference from Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
January 27, 2010)
|
|
#10.10
|
Assignment
of Employment Agreement dated as of April 27, 2010, by and
between UniTek USA LLC and Berliner Communications, Inc. and
consented to by Peter Giacalone (Incorporated herein by reference from
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 18,
2010)
|
|
#10.11
|
Assignment
of Employment Agreement dated as of April 27, 2010, by and between
UniTek USA LLC and Berliner Communications, Inc. and consented
to by C. Scott Hisey (Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 18, 2010)
|
|
#10.12
|
Assignment
of Employment Agreement dated as of April 27, 2010, by and between
UniTek USA LLC and Berliner Communications, Inc. and consented to by
Ronald J. Lejman (Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 18, 2010)
|
|
10.13
|
Form
of D&O Indemnification Agreement (Incorporated herein by reference
from Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27,
2010)
|
|
10.14
|
Indemnification
Priority Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2010, by and among HM Capital
Partners LLC, Berliner Communications, Inc., BCI Communications, Inc.,
Unitek USA, LLC, Unitek Holdings, Inc., Unitek Midco, Inc. and Unitek
Acquisition, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2010)
|
|
10.15
|
Amended
and Restated Monitoring and Oversight Agreement, dated as of January 27,
2010, by and among BCI Communications, Inc., Unitek USA, LLC, Unitek
Holdings, Inc., Unitek Midco, Inc., Unitek Acquisition, Inc. and HM
Capital Partners I LP (Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27,
2010)
|
II-4
10.16
|
Unitek
Holdings, Inc. 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by
reference from Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27,
2010)
|
|
10.17
|
First
Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of September 27, 2007 among Unitek
Acquisition, Inc., Unitek Midco, Inc., certain subsidiaries of Unitek
Acquisition, Inc. as guarantors, the initial lenders, Royal Bank of Canada
and RBC Capital Markets. (Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 2, 2010)
|
|
10.18
|
Amendment
No. 1 to the First Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of December 5, 2007,
among Unitek Acquisition, Inc., the other lenders parties to the First
Lien Credit Agreement referred to therein and Royal Bank of Canada
(Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed on February 2, 2010)
|
|
10.19
|
Amendment
No. 2 to the First Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of March 26, 2008,
among Unitek Acquisition, Inc., the other lenders parties to the First
Lien Credit Agreement referred to therein and Royal Bank of Canada
(Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed on February 2, 2010)
|
|
10.20
|
Amendment
No. 3 to the First Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of June 23, 2009, among
Unitek Acquisition, Inc., Unitek Midco, Inc., certain subsidiaries of
Unitek Acquisition, Inc. as guarantors, the other lenders parties to the
First Lien Credit Agreement referred to therein and Royal Bank of Canada
(Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed on February 2, 2010)
|
|
10.21
|
Amendment
No. 4 to the First Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2009,
among Unitek Acquisition, Inc., Unitek Midco, Inc., certain subsidiaries
of Unitek Acquisition, Inc. as guarantors, the other lenders parties to
the First Lien Credit Agreement referred to therein and Royal Bank of
Canada (Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on February 2, 2010)
|
|
10.22
|
Incremental
Term B Facility Amendment, dated as of December 21, 2007, among Unitek
Acquisition, Inc., the Incremental Term B Lender (as defined therein) and
Royal Bank of Canada (Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 2, 2010)
|
|
10.23
|
Second
Incremental Term B Facility Amendment, dated as of July 2, 2008, among
Unitek Acquisition, Inc., the Incremental Term B Lender (as defined
therein) and Royal Bank of Canada (Incorporated herein by reference from
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 2,
2010)
|
|
10.24
|
Incremental
Term C Facility Amendment, dated as of December 21, 2007, among Unitek
Acquisition, Inc., the Incremental Term C Lenders (as defined therein) and
Royal Bank of Canada (Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 2, 2010)
|
|
10.25
|
Second
Incremental Term C Facility Amendment, dated as of September 30, 2008,
among Unitek Acquisition, Inc., the Second Incremental Term C Lenders (as
defined therein) and Royal Bank of Canada (Incorporated herein by
reference from Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 2,
2010)
|
|
10.26
|
Amendment
No. 1 to Second Incremental Term C Facility Amendment, dated as of May 15,
2009, among Unitek Acquisition, Inc., the Second Incremental Term C
Lenders (as defined therein) and Royal Bank of Canada (Incorporated herein
by reference from Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February
2, 2010)
|
|
10.27
|
Amendment
No. 2 to Second Incremental Term C Facility Amendment, dated as of
December 17, 2009, among Unitek Acquisition, Inc., the Second Incremental
Term C Lenders (as defined therein) and Royal Bank of Canada (Incorporated
herein by reference from Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
February 2, 2010)
|
II-5
10.28
|
Second
Lien Term Loan Agreement, dated as of September 27, 2007, among Unitek
Acquisition, Inc., Unitek Midco, Inc., certain subsidiaries of Unitek
Acquisition, Inc. as guarantors, the initial lenders, Royal Bank of Canada
and RBC Capital Markets (Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 2, 2010)
|
|
10.29
|
Amendment
No. 1 to the Second Lien Term Loan Agreement, dated as of May 15, 2009,
among Unitek Acquisition, Inc., Unitek Midco, Inc., certain subsidiaries
of Unitek Acquisition, Inc. as guarantors, the financial institutions and
other lenders parties to the Second Lien Credit Agreement referred to
therein and Royal Bank of Canada (Incorporated herein by reference from
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 2,
2010)
|
|
10.30
|
Amendment
No. 2 to the Second Lien Term Loan Agreement, dated as of December 17,
2009, among Unitek Acquisition, Inc., Unitek Midco, Inc., certain
subsidiaries of Unitek Acquisition, Inc. as guarantors, the financial
institutions and other lenders parties to the Second Lien Credit Agreement
referred to therein and Royal Bank of Canada (Incorporated herein by
reference from Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 2,
2010)
|
|
10.31
|
Loan
Authorization Agreement, dated as of September 25, 2007, among Unitek
Holdings, Inc. and BMO Capital Markets Financing, Inc. (Incorporated
herein by reference from Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
February 2, 2010)
|
|
10.32
|
First
Amendment to Loan Authorization Agreement, dated as of March 24, 2008,
among Unitek Holdings, Inc. and BMO Capital Markets Financing, Inc.
(Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed on February 2, 2010)
|
|
10.33
|
Second
Amendment to Loan Authorization Agreement, dated as of September 15, 2009,
among Unitek Holdings, Inc. and BMO Capital Markets Financing, Inc.
(Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed on February 2, 2010)
|
|
10.34
|
First
Incremental Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of March 30, 2010, by and
among Unitek Acquisition, Inc., Unitek Midco, Inc., certain subsidiaries
as subsidiary guarantors, Maxam Opportunities Fund LP and Maxam
Opportunities Fund (International) LP, and Royal Bank of Canada, as
Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent. (Incorporated herein by
reference from Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 18,
2010)
|
|
10.35
|
Third
Incremental Term B Facility Amendment and Amendment No. 6 to the First
Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of July 16, 2010, by and among Unitek
Acquisition, Inc., Unitek Midco, Inc., certain subsidiaries as
subsidiary guarantors, the Third Incremental Term B Lenders, Royal Bank of
Canada and other lenders parties to the First Lien Credit Agreement
(Incorporated herein by reference from Company’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed on July 22, 2010)
|
|
*21 |
Subsidiaries
of the Registant
|
|
+23.1
|
Consent
of BDO Seidman, LLP, independent registered public accounting
firm
|
|
+23.2
|
Consent
of Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting
firm
|
|
*23.3
|
Consent
of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP (included in Exhibit
5.1)
|
|
24.1
|
Power
of Attorney (included in the signature page to this registration
statement)
|
#
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
* To be
filed by amendment.
+ Filed
herewith.
(a)(1)
|
Financial
Statements
|
UniTek Holdings, Inc. Consolidated Financial Statements for
the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
II-6
(a)(2) Financial Statement
Schedules
(b) Exhibits
See Item
16.
II-7
Item 17. Undertakings
Insofar
as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be
permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant
pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In
the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than
the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director,
officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any
action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling
person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will,
unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling
precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether
such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the
Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such
issue.
The
undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
1.
|
For
purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, the
information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this
registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a
form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)
(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to
be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared
effective.
|
2.
|
For
the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each
post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be
deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities
offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be
deemed to be the initial bona fide offering
thereof.
|
II-8
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the registrant
has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Blue Bell, Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania, on August 13, 2010.
UniTek
Global Services, Inc.
|
|
By:
|
/s/
C. Scott Hisey
|
Name:
C. Scott Hisey
|
|
Title:
Chief Executive Officer
|
Power
of Attorney
We, the
undersigned officers and directors of UniTek Global Services, Inc., hereby
severally constitute and appoint C. Scott Hisey and Nicholas Day, and each of
them, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, each acting alone,
with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or
her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any or all
amendments (including post-effective amendments, exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith) to this registration statement on Form S-1
and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them,
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done to comply with the provisions of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and all requirements of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their, his or her substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, this registration
statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and
on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURE
|
TITLE
|
DATE
|
||
/s/ C. Scott Hisey |
Chief
Executive Officer
|
August
13, 2010
|
||
C.
Scott Hisey
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|||
/s/ Ronald J. Lejman |
Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
August
13, 2010
|
||
Ronald
J. Lejman
|
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|||
/s/ Peter Giacalone |
Director,
Chairman of the Board and President
|
August
13, 2010
|
||
Peter
Giacalone
|
||||
/s/ Richard Berliner |
Director,
Chief Marketing Officer and Chief
|
August
13, 2010
|
||
Richard
Berliner
|
Executive
Officer of BCI Communications, Inc.
|
|||
/s/ Peter Brodsky |
Director
|
August
13, 2010
|
||
Peter
Brodsky
|
/s/ Daniel Hopkin |
Director
|
August
13, 2010
|
||
Daniel
Hopkin
|
||||
/s/ Joseph Colonnetta |
Director
|
August
13, 2010
|
||
Joseph
Colonnetta
|
||||
/s/ Dean MacDonald |
Director
|
August
13, 2010
|
||
Dean
MacDonald
|
||||
/s/ Mark Dailey |
Director
|
August
13, 2010
|
||
Mark
Dailey
|
||||
/s/ Richard Siber |
Director
|
August
13, 2010
|
||
Richard
Siber
|