Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-4.16 - EXHIBIT 4.16 - Tower US Holdings Inc. | exhibit_4-16.htm |
EX-4.15 - EXHIBIT 4.15 - Tower US Holdings Inc. | exhibit_4-15.htm |
EX-10.46 - EXHIBIT 10.46 - Tower US Holdings Inc. | exhibit_10-46.htm |
EX-10.48 - EXHIBIT 10.48 - Tower US Holdings Inc. | exhibit_10-48.htm |
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - Tower US Holdings Inc. | exhibit_31-2.htm |
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - Tower US Holdings Inc. | exhibit_31-1.htm |
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
x
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
|
|
Or
|
|
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Commission file number: 001-32832
Jazz Technologies, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
20-3320580
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
4321 Jamboree Road
Newport Beach, California
|
92660
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
(949) 435-8000
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
(Note: As a voluntary filer not subject to the filing requirements, the Registrant has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer a non-accelerated filer or a “smaller reporting company”. See definitions of “large accelerated filer” and “accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated filer o
|
Non-accelerated filer x
|
Smaller reporting companyo
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
JAZZ TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
1
|
|||
2
|
|||
3
|
|||
4-10
|
|||
11-13
|
|||
13
|
|||
13
|
|||
13
|
|||
14
|
|||
14
|
|||
15
|
|||
15
|
i
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Jazz Technologies, Inc. (A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of
Tower Semiconductor, Ltd.) and Subsidiaries
(in thousands)
June 30, 2010
|
December 31,
2009
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current assets:
|
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 40,061 | $ | 28,622 | ||||
Receivables:
Trade receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $670 and $877 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively
|
30,975 | 23,664 | ||||||
Due from related party
|
888 | 25 | ||||||
Inventories
|
13,262 | 11,828 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset
|
5,219 | 7,177 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
2,416 | 2,918 | ||||||
Total current assets
|
92,821 | 74,234 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
98,033 | 96,194 | ||||||
Investments
|
17,100 | 17,100 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net
|
50,711 | 53,029 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
7,000 | 7,000 | ||||||
Other assets
|
312 | 203 | ||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 265,977 | $ | 247,760 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current liabilities:
|
||||||||
Short-term debt from banks
|
$ | 12,000 | $ | 7,000 | ||||
Accounts payable
|
14,240 | 14,267 | ||||||
Due to related party
|
4,867 | 7,799 | ||||||
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
7,670 | 5,862 | ||||||
Deferred revenues
|
3,171 | 2,506 | ||||||
Accrued interest
|
4,939 | 577 | ||||||
Other current liabilities
|
9,070 | 6,003 | ||||||
Total current liabilities
|
55,957 | 44,014 | ||||||
Long term liabilities:
|
||||||||
Long-term debt from banks
|
10,000 | 20,000 | ||||||
Convertible notes
|
113,722 | 110,971 | ||||||
Deferred tax liability
|
11,195 | 11,195 | ||||||
Accrued pension, retirement medical plan obligations and other long-term liabilities
|
11,991 | 11,734 | ||||||
Total liabilities
|
202,865 | 197,914 | ||||||
Stockholder’s equity:
|
||||||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
50,070 | 50,070 | ||||||
Cumulative stock based compensation
|
732 | 427 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (*)
|
(1,298 | ) | (1,344 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings
|
13,608 | 693 | ||||||
Total stockholders’ equity
|
63,112 | 49,846 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 265,977 | $ | 247,760 |
|
(*)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss includes mainly net changes between pension plan assets and employees benefit obligation, net of taxes. See accompanying notes.
|
1
Jazz Technologies, Inc. (A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of
Tower Semiconductor, Ltd.) and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands)
Three months ended
|
Six months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
June 30, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
|||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
$ | 60,150 | $ | 31,092 | $ | 114,056 | $ | 60,271 | ||||||||
Cost of revenues
|
35,808 | 24,142 | 69,780 | 51,797 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
24,342 | 6,950 | 44,276 | 8,474 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Research and development
|
3,315 | 3,441 | 6,596 | 5,898 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative
|
5,868 | 3,534 | 10,202 | 7,576 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets
|
197 | 196 | 394 | 393 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses
|
9,380 | 7,171 | 17,192 | 13,867 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss)
|
14,962 | (221 | ) | 27,084 | (5,393 | ) | ||||||||||
Financing expense and other income, net
|
(3,984 | ) | (3,279 | ) | (7,976 | ) | (7,225 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) before income taxes
|
10,978 | (3,500 | ) | 19,108 | (12,618 | ) | ||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
(3,534 | ) | 1,633 | (6,193 | ) | 2,910 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 7,444 | $ | (1,867 | ) | $ | 12,915 | $ | (9,708 | ) |
See accompanying notes.
2
Tower Semiconductor, Ltd.) and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
Six months ended June 30, 2010
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009
|
|||||||
Operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 12,915 | $ | (9,708 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income for the period to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of intangible assets
|
15,484 | 9,420 | ||||||
Convertible notes accretion and amortization of deferred financing costs
|
2,810 | 2,529 | ||||||
Other income
|
-- | (650 | ) | |||||
Stock based compensation expense
|
305 | 94 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Receivables
|
(7,311 | ) | 5,755 | |||||
Inventories
|
(1,434 | ) | 2,812 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
902 | 1,325 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets
|
1,958 | -- | ||||||
Accounts payable
|
(240 | ) | (3,040 | ) | ||||
Due to related party, net
|
(3,795 | ) | 459 | |||||
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
1,808 | (414 | ) | |||||
Deferred Revenue
|
665 | 1,200 | ||||||
Accrued interest
|
4,362 | (59 | ) | |||||
Other current liabilities
|
3,067 | 2,021 | ||||||
Deferred tax liability
|
-- | (2,916 | ) | |||||
Accrued pension, retirement medical plan obligations and long-term liabilities
|
257 | (465 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
31,753 | 8,363 | ||||||
Investing activities:
|
||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment
|
(15,560 | ) | (6,114 | ) | ||||
Purchases of intangible assets
|
(400 | ) | (1,000 | ) | ||||
Proceeds related to sale and disposal of property and equipment
|
600 | -- | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(15,360 | ) | (7,114 | ) | ||||
Financing activities:
|
||||||||
Debt repayment
|
(5,000 | ) | (350 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(5,000 | ) | (350 | ) | ||||
Effect of foreign currency on cash
|
46 | (106 | ) | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
11,439 | 793 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
28,622 | 27,574 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 40,061 | $ | 28,367 |
Supplemental disclosure of interest and taxes paid and non-cash investing and financing activities:
Investments in property, plant and equipment
|
$ | 2,381 | $ | -- | ||||
Interest paid
|
$ | 878 | $ | 5,575 | ||||
Tax paid
|
$ | 2,913 | $ | 214 |
See accompanying notes.
3
Jazz Technologies, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2010
Note 1: Organization
Unless specifically noted otherwise, as used throughout these notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, “Jazz”, “Company” refers to the business of Jazz Technologies, Inc., and “Jazz Semiconductor” refers only to the business of Jazz Semiconductor, Inc. References to the “Company” for dates prior to September 19, 2008 mean the Predecessor which on September 19, 2008 was merged with a subsidiary of Tower Semiconductor Ltd., an Israeli company (“Tower”), and references to the “Company” for periods on or after September 19, 2008 are references to the Successor Tower subsidiary.
The Company
Jazz, formerly known as Acquicor Technology Inc., was incorporated in Delaware on August 12, 2005. The Company was formed to serve as a vehicle for the acquisition of one or more domestic and/or foreign operating businesses through a merger, capital stock exchange, stock purchase, asset acquisition or other similar business combination.
The Company is based in Newport Beach, California and following the acquisition of Jazz Semiconductor, became an independent semiconductor foundry focused on specialty process technologies for the manufacture of analog intensive mixed-signal semiconductor devices. The Company’s specialty process technologies include advanced analog, radio frequency, high voltage, bipolar and silicon germanium bipolar complementary metal oxide (“SiGe”) semiconductor processes. The Company’s semiconductor devices are used in cellular phones, wireless local area networking devices, digital TVs, set-top boxes, gaming devices, switches, routers and broadband modems.
Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with SEC and U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) requirements and include all adjustments of a normal recurring nature that are necessary to fairly present our condensed consolidated results of operations, financial position, and cash flows for all periods presented. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Interim period results are not necessarily indicative of full year results. This quarterly report should be read in conjunction with our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein are unaudited; however, they contain all normal recurring adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the Company’s consolidated financial position at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and the consolidated results of its operations and cash flows for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain amounts have been reclassified in order to conform to 2010 presentation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate fair value due to their short maturities.
4
Comprehensive Loss
Six months ended June 30, 2010
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009
|
|||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 12,915 | $ | (9,708 | ) | |||
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
46 | (106 | ) | |||||
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
$ | 12,961 | $ | (9,814 | ) |
Concentrations
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents and trade accounts receivable. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history, age of the balance and the customer’s current credit worthiness, as determined by a review of the customer’s current credit information. The Company monitors collections and payments from its customers and maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon historical experience and any specific customer collection issues that have been identified. A considerable amount of judgment is required in assessing the ultimate realization of these receivables. Customer receivables are generally unsecured.
Accounts receivable from significant customers representing 10% or more of the net accounts receivable balance as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consists of the following customers:
June 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
|||||||
R F Micro Devices
|
31 | % | 35 | % | ||||
Skyworks
|
15 | % | 14 | % |
Net revenues from significant customers representing 10% or more of net revenues consist of the following:
Three months ended
|
Six months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
June 30, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
|||||||||||||
R F Micro Devices
|
28 | % | 17 | % | 31 | % | 21 | % | ||||||||
Skyworks
|
14 | % | 14 | % | 14 | % | 15 | % |
As a result of the Company’s concentration of its customer base, loss or cancellation of business from, or significant changes in scheduled deliveries of products sold to these customers or a change in their financial position could materially and adversely affect the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company operates a single manufacturing facility located in Newport Beach, California. A major interruption in the manufacturing operations at this facility would have a material adverse affect on the consolidated financial position and results of operations of the Company.
Initial Adoption of New Standards
ASU 2009-5 - Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures of Liabilities
Effective January 1, 2010, the Company adopted FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05 (“ASU”), Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures Topic 820 – Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value, which provides amendments to subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities. This update provides clarification that in circumstances that liabilities are measured at fair value, in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques: (1). A valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical or similar liability or identical or similar liability when traded as an asset (which would be considered Level 1 fair value measurement); or (2) An other valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of topic 820. The amendments in this update also clarify that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include an adjustment to the fair value due to the restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The adoption of this update did not impact the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
5
ASU 2010-6 - Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, that requires reporting entities to make new disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair-value measurements including significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair-value measurements and information on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair-value measurements. The FASB also clarified existing fair-value measurement disclosure guidance about the level of disaggregation, inputs, and valuation techniques. The new and revised disclosures are required to be implemented in interim or annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the gross presentation of the Level 3 rollforward, which is required for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this standard did not have any effect on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.
ASU 2010-17- Revenue Recognition-Milestone Method (Topic 605): Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition (A consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)
In April 2010, the FASB issued Revenue Recognition-Milestone Method (Topic 605): Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition (A consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this update provide guidance on the criteria that should be met for determining whether the milestone method of revenue recognition is appropriate. A vendor can recognize consideration that is contingent upon achievement of a milestone in its entirety as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the milestone meets all criteria to be considered substantive as defined in the ASU.
A vendor’s decision to use the milestone method of revenue recognition for transactions within the scope of the amendments in this update is a policy election. Other proportional revenue recognition methods also may be applied as long as the application of those other methods does not result in the recognition of consideration in its entirety in the period the milestone is achieved.
The update is effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
ASU 2009-13- Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13, “Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements a consensus of EITF” (formerly topic 08-1) an amendment to ASC 605-25. The update provides amendments to the criteria in Subtopic 605-25 for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements. The amendments in this update establish a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. The selling price used for each deliverable will be based on vendor-specific objective evidence if available, third-party evidence if vendor-specific objective evidence is not available, or estimated selling price if neither vendor-specific objective evidence nor third-party evidence is available. The amendments in this update will also replace the term “fair value” in the revenue allocation guidance with the term “selling price” in order to clarify that the allocation of revenue is based on entity-specific assumptions rather than assumptions of a marketplace participant.
The amendments will also eliminate the residual method of allocation and require that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. The relative selling price method allocates any discount in the arrangement proportionally to each deliverable on the basis of each deliverable's selling price.
The update is effective for revenue arrangements entered into or modified in fiscal year beginning on or after June 15, 2010 with earlier adoption permitted. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2010 - 13 - Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades
In April 2010, the FASB issued this ASU to clarify the classification of an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which the underlying equity security trades.
This update provides amendments to Topic 718 to clarify that also an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity securities trades should also be classified as an equity award. The update is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
6
Note 3: Other Balance Sheet Details
Inventories
Inventories, net of reserves, consist of the following at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
June 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
|||||||
Raw material
|
$ | 1,786 | $ | 1,879 | ||||
Work in process
|
9,999 | 7,739 | ||||||
Finished goods
|
1,477 | 2,210 | ||||||
$ | 13,262 | $ | 11,828 |
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
Useful life (In years)
|
June 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||
Building improvements
|
10-12 | $ | 24,230 | $ | 24,230 | |||||||
Machinery and equipment
|
7 | 102,446 | 91,107 | |||||||||
Furniture and equipment
|
5-7 | 2,203 | 2,203 | |||||||||
Computer software
|
3 | 850 | 850 | |||||||||
129,729 | 118,390 | |||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation
|
(31,696 | ) | (22,196 | ) | ||||||||
|
$ | 98,033 | $ | 96,194 |
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of the following at June 30, 2010 (in thousands):
Weighted Average Life (years)
|
Cost
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Net
|
|||||||||||||
Technology
|
4;9 | $ | 2,300 | $ | 414 | $ | 1,886 | |||||||||
Patents and other core technology rights
|
9 | 15,100 | 2,997 | 12,103 | ||||||||||||
In-process research and development
|
-- | 1,800 | 1,800 | -- | ||||||||||||
Customer relationships
|
15 | 2,600 | 310 | 2,290 | ||||||||||||
Trade name
|
9 | 5,200 | 1,032 | 4,168 | ||||||||||||
Facilities lease
|
19 | 33,500 | 3,236 | 30,264 | ||||||||||||
Total identifiable intangible assets
|
14 | $ | 60,500 | $ | 9,789 | $ | 50,711 |
7
Intangible assets consist of the following at December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
Weighted Average Life (years)
|
Cost
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Net
|
|||||||||||||
Technology
|
4;9 | $ | 2,300 | $ | 217 | $ | 2,083 | |||||||||
Patents and other core technology rights
|
9 | 15,100 | 2,159 | 12,941 | ||||||||||||
In-process research and development
|
-- | 1,800 | 1,800 | -- | ||||||||||||
Customer relationships
|
15 | 2,600 | 222 | 2,378 | ||||||||||||
Trade name
|
9 | 5,200 | 744 | 4,456 | ||||||||||||
Facilities lease
|
19 | 33,500 | 2,329 | 31,171 | ||||||||||||
Total identifiable intangible assets
|
14 | $ | 60,500 | $ | 7,471 | $ | 53,029 |
The Company expects future amortization expense to be as follows (in thousands):
Charge to
cost of revenues
|
Charge to operating expenses
|
Total
|
||||||||||
Fiscal year ends:
|
||||||||||||
Remainder of 2010
|
$ | 1,938 | $ | 394 | $ | 2,332 | ||||||
2011
|
3,846 | 788 | 4,634 | |||||||||
2012
|
3,846 | 788 | 4,634 | |||||||||
2013
|
3,814 | 788 | 4,602 | |||||||||
2014
|
3,596 | 788 | 4,384 | |||||||||
Thereafter
|
26,607 | 3,518 | 30,125 | |||||||||
Total expected future amortization expense
|
$ | 43,647 | $ | 7,064 | $ | 50,711 |
The amortization related to technology, patents, other core technologies, and the facilities’ lease is charged to cost of revenues. The amortization related to customer relationships and trade name is charged to operating expenses.
Note 4: Credit Facility
On June 29, 2010, the Company entered into a Fourth Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of September 19, 2008 (the “Wachovia Loan Agreement”), among Jazz as parent guarantor, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, as lead arranger, bookrunner and syndication agent, and Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation (Western), as administrative agent (“Wachovia”), and Jazz Semiconductor, Inc. and Newport Fab, LLC, as borrowers. Pursuant to the terms of the Fourth Amendment to Wachovia Loan Agreement, the maturity date of the revolving credit facility is extended to September 19, 2014, and available credit under the facility is an amount up to $45 million. The borrowing availability varies according to the levels of the borrowers’ accounts receivable, eligible equipment and other terms and conditions described in the Wachovia Loan Agreement. Loans under the facility will bear interest at a rate equal to, at borrowers’ option, either the lender’s prime rate plus a margin ranging from 0.50% to 1.0% or the LIBOR rate (as defined in the Wachovia Loan Agreement) plus a margin ranging from 2.25% to 2.75% per annum.
Borrowing availability under the facility as of June 30, 2010, was $11.3 million. Outstanding borrowings were $22 million and $1.8 million of the facility supporting outstanding letters of credits on that date. The Company considers borrowings of $ 10.0 million to be long-term debt as of June 30, 2010. As of June 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all the covenants under this facility.
Note 5: Notes
On July 9, 2010, the Company, together with its domestic subsidiaries and its parent, Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (“Tower”), entered into an exchange agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with certain note holders (the “Participating Holders”) holding approximately $79.6 million principal amount of the Company’s outstanding 8% convertible notes due December 2011 (the “Old Notes”). Under the Exchange Agreement, the Participating Holders exchanged their Old Notes for newly-issued 8% non-convertible notes of the Company due June 2015 (the “New Notes”) with an exchange ratio of 1.175 New Notes for each 1.000 Old Notes. In addition, the participants received warrants to purchase approximately 25.3 million ordinary shares of Tower (the “Tower Warrants”). On July 15, 2010, the transactions contemplated by the Exchange Agreement were consummated, resulting in the issuance of the New Notes and Tower Warrants in exchange for the Old Notes in accordance with the terms of the Exchange Agreement.
Interest on the unpaid principal amount of the New Notes accrues from the closing date at a rate of 8% per annum.
8
Interest is payable semiannually on June 30 and December 31 of each year commencing on December 31, 2010. The New Notes are scheduled to mature on June 30, 2015, at which time principal and any accrued and unpaid interest will become due and payable.
The New Notes are governed by an indenture (the “Indenture”) among the Company, its domestic subsidiaries as guarantors and U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association, as trustee. The New Notes constitute unsecured obligations of the Company, rank on parity in right of payment with all other indebtedness of the Company including the Old Notes, and are effectively subordinated to all secured indebtedness of the Company to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness. The New Notes shall rank senior to all future indebtedness of the Company to the extent the future indebtedness is expressly subordinated to the New Notes. The New Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by the Company’s domestic subsidiaries. The Company’s obligations under the Old Notes and New Notes are not guaranteed by Tower.
Beginning July 1, 2013, the Company may redeem some or all of the New Notes for cash at a redemption price equal to par plus accrued and unpaid interest plus a redemption premium equal to 4% if redemption occurs prior to July 1, 2014 and 2% if redemption occurs between July 1, 2014 and maturity.
The Indenture contains certain covenants including covenants restricting the Company’s ability and the ability of its subsidiaries to, among other things, incur additional debt, incur additional liens, make specified payments and make certain asset sales.
Holders of the New Notes are entitled, subject to certain conditions and restrictions, to require the Company to repurchase the New Notes at par plus accrued interest and a 1% redemption premium in the event of certain change of control transactions.
If there is an event of default on the New Notes, all of the New Notes may become immediately due and payable, subject to certain conditions set forth in the Indenture. An event of default under the Indenture will occur if the Company (or in some cases certain of its subsidiaries) (i) is delinquent in making certain payments under the New Notes, (ii) engages in a merger, consolidation or sale of substantially all of the Company’s assets, except as permitted by the Indenture, (iii) fails to deliver certain required notices under the New Notes, (iv) fails, following notice, to cure a breach of any other default under the New Notes or Indenture, (v) incurs certain events of default with respect to other indebtedness, (vi) is subject to certain bankruptcy proceedings or orders or (vii) fails to pay certain judgments. An event of default will also occur upon the occurrence of certain events relating to the guarantees of the New Notes.
If certain governmental approvals required for the issuance of shares issuable upon exercise of the Tower Warrants are not obtained within 60 days after closing, the New Notes will accrue additional interest at an annual rate of 2% for the next 120 days and 4.5% thereafter, until such approvals are obtained or an opinion of counsel that such approvals are not required is provided to the trustee. If such approvals or opinion of counsel are not obtained by the one-year anniversary of the issue date, the additional interest will continue to accrue on the New Notes through maturity.
The Company has entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with the Participating Holders pursuant to which the Company agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to file and cause to be declared effective a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 (as amended, the “Securities Act”) covering an offer to the holders of the New Notes to exchange the New Notes for newly-issued notes of the Company on terms identical to the New Notes (except that such newly-issued notes will not be subject to restrictions on transfer). If the offer is not completed within 180 days of the closing date, the annual interest rate applicable to the New Notes will increase by 1% for so long as the failure continues or until such earlier date as the New Notes become freely tradable under the Securities Act.
As of the date of this report, approximately $43.7 million in aggregate principal amount of Old Notes are outstanding. The Old Notes are convertible into Tower ordinary shares at a price of $4.07 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth in the indenture for the Old Notes.
Note 6: Income Taxes
The Company’s effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2010 differs from the statutory rate primarily due to the federal Domestic Production Activities Deduction.
At June 30, 2010, it is reasonably likely that $1.3 million of the unrecognized tax benefits will reverse during the next twelve months. The reversal of uncertain tax benefits is primarily related to net operating losses that will be abandoned if the Company liquidates its Chinese subsidiary in 2010.
9
Note 7: Employee Benefit Plans
The pension and other post retirement benefit plans expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 were $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively. The amounts for the pension and other post retirement benefit plans expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 were $0.3 million and $0.7 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2010 the Company does not have sufficient information to estimate the effect of recent announced health reform, if any.
Note 8: Employee Stock Option Expense
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, Tower awarded 244,500 non-qualified stock options exercisable to Tower ordinary shares to Company employees that vest over a three year period from the date of grant. The weighted average exercise price was $1.30. The Company recorded $141,883 and $305,296 of compensation expenses relating to options granted to employees, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. The Company recorded $41,712 and $94,420 of compensation expenses relating to employees options, during the corresponding periods in 2009.
Note 9: Related Party Transactions
As of June
30, 2010
|
As of December
31, 2009
|
|||||||
Due from related party (included in the accompanying balance sheets)
|
$ | 888 | $ | 25 | ||||
Due to related party (included in the accompanying balance sheets)
|
$ | 4,867 | $ | 7,799 |
Related party balances are with Tower and HHNEC and are mainly for purchases and payments on behalf of the other party, tools sale and service charges.
Note 10: Litigation
During 2008, an International Trade Commission (“ITC”) action was filed by Agere/LSI Corporation (“LSI”), which alleged infringement by 17 corporations of LSI’s patent no. 5,227,335. Following the initial filing, in October 2008, LSI amended the ITC complaint to add the Company, Tower and three other corporations as additional respondents. In September, 2009, the administrative law judge ruled against LSI and in favor of the respondents, determining that the patent claims asserted by LSI are invalid. In November 2009, in response to a Petition for Review filed by LSI, the ITC determined that it would review the Judge’s determination on patent invalidity. In March 2010, the full ITC commission determined that there is no ITC violation, found the LSI patent claims to be invalid, and terminated the ITC investigation. The Company does not know whether any further legal proceedings will be pursued by LSI and cannot predict the outcome thereof.
In connection with the Company’s aerospace and defense business, its facility security clearance and trusted foundry status, the Company and Tower are working with the Defense Security Service of the United States Department of Defense (“DSS”) to develop an appropriate structure to mitigate any concern of foreign ownership, control or influence over the operations of the Company specifically relating to protection of classified information and prevention of potential unauthorized access thereto. In order to safeguard classified information, it is expected that the DSS will require adoption of a Special Security Agreement (“SSA”). The SSA may include certain security related restrictions, including restrictions on the composition of the board of directors, the separation of certain employees and operations, as well as restrictions on disclosure of classified information to Tower. The provisions contained in the SSA may also limit the projected synergies and other benefits to be realized from the merger of Tower and Jazz. There is no assurance when, if at all, an SSA will be reached.
Note 11: Leases
The Company leases the use of its fabrication facilities from Conexant under non-cancellable operating leases that expire March 12, 2017 and has the unilateral option to extend the terms of each of these leases for two consecutive five-year periods ending in 2027. Under the leases, as amended, the Company’s headquarters offices may be relocated once to another building within one mile of its current location, at Conexant’s option and expense, subject to certain conditions. In January 2010, Conexant announced that it had agreed, subject to closing conditions, to sell the Company’s fabrication facilities, land and headquarters to a residential and mixed-use developer of California urban real estate projects. In March 2010, it was announced that the agreement for the proposed sale by Conexant had been terminated.
10
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes contained elsewhere in this report. See our Annual Report on Form 10-K and subsequent quarterly reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for information regarding certain risk factors known to us that could cause reported financial information not to be necessarily indicative of future results.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report on Form 10-Q may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Report Act of 1995. These statements, which represent our expectations or beliefs concerning various future events, may contain words such as “may,” “will,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” or other words indicating future results. Such statements may include but are not limited to statements concerning the following:
|
●
|
anticipated trends in revenues;
|
|
●
|
growth opportunities in domestic and international markets;
|
|
●
|
new and enhanced channels of distribution;
|
|
●
|
customer acceptance and satisfaction with our products;
|
|
●
|
expected trends in operating and other expenses;
|
|
●
|
purchase of raw materials at levels to meet forecasted demand;
|
|
●
|
anticipated cash and intentions regarding usage of cash;
|
|
●
|
changes in effective tax rates; and
|
|
●
|
anticipated product enhancements or releases.
|
These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including those risks and uncertainties described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and subsequent quarterly reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated as of the date of this report. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances arising after the date of this report.
11
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, we had a net profit $12.9 million compared to a net loss of $9.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
The following table sets forth certain statement of operations data as a percentage of total revenues for the periods indicated.
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||
June 30, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
|||||||
Net revenues
|
100 | % | 100 | % | ||||
Cost of revenues
|
61.2 | 85.9 | ||||||
Gross profit
|
38.8 | 14.1 | ||||||
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||
Research and development
|
5.8 | 9.8 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative
|
8.9 | 12.6 | ||||||
Amortization of intangible assets
|
0.3 | 0.7 | ||||||
Total operating expenses
|
15.1 | 23.0 | ||||||
Operating income (loss)
|
23.7 | (8.9 | ) | |||||
Financing expense and other income, net
|
7.0 | 12.0 | ||||||
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
(5.4 | ) | 4.8 | |||||
Net income (loss)
|
11.3 | % | (16.1 | )% |
Comparison of six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009
Revenues
Our net revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2010 increased by $53.8 million, or 89%, to $114.1 million from $60.3 million in the corresponding period in 2009. This increase is mainly due to higher shipments following the worldwide increase in demand in the semiconductor industry and specialty foundry business in the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 which was influenced by the worldwide economic downturn and due to our focus in specialty products and our specific product offering.
Cost of Revenues
Our cost of revenues increased to $69.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 from $51.8 million for the corresponding period in 2009. The 35% increase in cost of revenues as compared to the 89% increase in revenue is mainly due to the higher utilization of the manufacturing facilities and continuing efforts of cost reduction and due to the fact that a significant portion of our costs of revenue are fixed.
Gross Profit
Gross profit increased to $44.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to $8.5 million in the corresponding period in 2009 reflecting the increased sales and improved margins. Gross profit margin increased to 39% for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to 14% in the corresponding period in 2009
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 increased by $3.3 million to $17.2 million, as compared to $13.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in operating expenses include expenses resulted directly from the increase in revenues. Operating expenses as a percentage of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were 15% as compared to 23% in the six months ended June 30, 2009.
12
Financing Expense and Other Income, net
Financing expense and other income, net for the six months ended June 30, 2010 amounted to $8.0 million, as compared to $7.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Financing expense, net are mainly relating to our convertible notes.
Income Tax Benefit (Expense)
Income tax expense amounted to $6.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010, as compared to income tax benefit of $2.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009, due to the operating income in the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the operating loss in the six months ended June 30, 2009. The Company’s effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2010 differs from the statutory rate primarily due to the federal Domestic Production Activities Deduction.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, our principal executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective at the “reasonable assurance” level. We believe that a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the control system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
During 2008, an International Trade Commission (“ITC”) action was filed by Agere/LSI Corporation (“LSI”), which alleged infringement by 17 corporations of LSI’s patent no. 5,227,335. Following the initial filing, in October 2008, LSI amended the ITC complaint to add the Company, Tower and three other corporations as additional respondents. In September, 2009, the administrative law judge (“Judge”) ruled against LSI and in favor of the respondents, determining that the patent claims asserted by LSI are invalid. In November 2009, in response to a Petition for Review filed by LSI, the ITC determined that it would review the Judge’s determination on patent invalidity. In March 2010, the full ITC commission determined that there is no ITC violation, found the LSI patent claims to be invalid, and terminated the ITC investigation. The Company does not know whether any further legal proceedings will be pursued by LSI and cannot predict the outcome thereof.
In connection with the Company’s aerospace and defense business, its facility security clearance and trusted foundry status, the Company and Tower are working with the Defense Security Service of the United States Department of Defense (“DSS”) to develop an appropriate structure to mitigate any concern of foreign ownership, control or influence over the operations of the Company specifically relating to protection of classified information and prevention of potential unauthorized access thereto. In order to safeguard classified information, it is expected that the DSS will require adoption of a Special Security Agreement (“SSA”). The SSA may include certain security related restrictions, including restrictions on the composition of the board of directors, the separation of certain employees and operations, as well as restrictions on disclosure of classified information to Tower. The provisions contained in the SSA may also limit the projected synergies and other benefits to be realized from the merger of Tower and Jazz. There is no assurance when, if at all, an SSA will be reached.
13
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information contained in this Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the risk factors associated with our business previously disclosed in Item 1A to Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. Our business, financial condition and/or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business and operations.
Number
|
Description
|
|
4.15
|
Indenture dated July 15, 2010 by and among Jazz Technologies, Jazz Semiconductor, Inc., Newport Fab, LLC and U.S. Bank National Association.
|
|
4.16
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated July 15, 2010 by and among Jazz Technologies, Jazz Semiconductor, Inc., Newport Fab, LLC and holders of the Registrant’s 8% Senior Notes due 2015.
|
|
10.46
|
Third Amendment dated April 21, 2010 to Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of September 19, 2008 by and among, the Registrant, Jazz Semiconductor Inc., Newport Fab, LLC. Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation (Western) and the lenders from time to time a party thereto.
|
|
10.47
|
Fourth Amendment dated June 29, 2010 to Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of September 19, 2008 by and among, the Registrant, Jazz Semiconductor Inc., Newport Fab, LLC. Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation (Western) and the lenders from time to time a party thereto. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Jazz Technologies current report on Form 8-K filed on July 1, 2010.
|
|
10.48
|
Exchange Agreement dated July 9, 2010 by and among Jazz Technologies, Inc., Tower Semiconductor, Ltd., Jazz Semiconductor, Inc., Newport Fab, LLC, Zazove Associates, LLC and certain holders of the Registrant’s 8% Senior Notes due 2011.
|
|
31.1
|
Principal Executive Officer Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
|
|
31.2
|
CFO Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
|
|
32
|
Section 1350 Certification. (Not provided as not required of voluntary filers)
|
14
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: August 13, 2010
|
JAZZ TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Rafi Mor
|
|
_____
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
||
By:
|
/s/ SUSANNA H. BENNETT
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
Number
|
Description
|
|
4.15
|
Indenture dated July 15, 2010 by and among Jazz Technologies, Jazz Semiconductor, Inc., Newport Fab, LLC and U.S. Bank National Association.
|
|
4.16
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated July 15, 2010 by and among Jazz Technologies, Jazz Semiconductor, Inc., Newport Fab, LLC and holders of the Registrant’s 8% Senior Notes due 2015.
|
|
10.46
|
Third Amendment dated April 21, 2010 to Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of September 19, 2008 by and among, the Registrant, Jazz Semiconductor Inc., Newport Fab, LLC. Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation (Western) and the lenders from time to time a party thereto.
|
|
10.47
|
Fourth Amendment dated June 29, 2010 to Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of September 19, 2008 by and among, the Registrant, Jazz Semiconductor Inc., Newport Fab, LLC. Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation (Western) and the lenders from time to time a party thereto. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Jazz Technologies current report on Form 8-K filed on July 1, 2010.
|
|
10.48
|
Exchange Agreement dated July 9, 2010 by and among Jazz Technologies, Inc., Tower Semiconductor, Ltd., Jazz Semiconductor, Inc., Newport Fab, LLC, Zazove Associates, LLC and certain holders of the Registrant’s 8% Senior Notes due 2011.
|
|
31.1
|
Principal Executive Officer Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
|
|
31.2
|
CFO Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
|
|
32
|
Section 1350 Certification. (Not provided as not required of voluntary filers)
|