Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - iPayment, Inc. | g24332exv32w1.htm |
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - iPayment, Inc. | g24332exv32w2.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - iPayment, Inc. | g24332exv31w2.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - iPayment, Inc. | g24332exv31w1.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-50280
iPayment, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 62-1847043 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
40 Burton Hills Boulevard, Suite 415 | ||
Nashville, Tennessee | 37215 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (615) 665-1858
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o No
þ (Note: The registrant, as a voluntary filer, is not subject to the filing
requirements under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, but has been filing
all reports required to be filed by those sections for the preceding 12 months.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2
of the Act). Yes o No þ
Title of each class | Shares Outstanding at August 13, 2010 | |
(Common stock, $0.01 par value) | 100 |
Table of Contents
Part 1.
Item 1. Financial Statements
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | (Audited) | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1 | $ | 2 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $792 and $857 at
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
24,617 | 25,077 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
1,107 | 1,463 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
2,352 | 2,353 | ||||||
Total current assets |
28,077 | 28,895 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
668 | 680 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
4,910 | 4,673 | ||||||
Intangible assets and other, net of accumulated amortization of $158,346 and $138,789
at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
148,815 | 163,774 | ||||||
Goodwill |
527,978 | 527,978 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets, net |
5,969 | 8,219 | ||||||
Other assets, net |
11,001 | 11,147 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 727,418 | $ | 745,366 | ||||
LIABILITIES and STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 3,576 | $ | 4,132 | ||||
Income taxes payable |
5,538 | 8,529 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities and other |
18,301 | 22,835 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
27,415 | 35,496 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
633,743 | 651,519 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
8,916 | 15,213 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
670,074 | 702,228 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) |
||||||||
Equity |
||||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000 shares authorized, 100 shares issued and
outstanding at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 |
20,055 | 20,055 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefits of $2,532 and $4,984
at
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
(3,798 | ) | (7,475 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
41,087 | 30,558 | ||||||
Total equity |
57,344 | 43,138 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 727,418 | $ | 745,366 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
Three | Three | Six | Six | |||||||||||||
Months | Months | Months | Months | |||||||||||||
Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | |||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 183,933 | $ | 190,745 | $ | 343,473 | $ | 360,798 | ||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Interchange |
98,544 | 103,575 | 189,541 | 200,485 | ||||||||||||
Other costs of services |
55,902 | 60,774 | 106,728 | 116,317 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
3,006 | 4,940 | 5,863 | 9,757 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
157,452 | 169,289 | 302,132 | 326,559 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
26,481 | 21,456 | 41,341 | 34,239 | ||||||||||||
Other expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
11,449 | 11,694 | 22,820 | 23,350 | ||||||||||||
Other expense, net |
602 | 1,072 | 372 | 1,090 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
14,430 | 8,690 | 18,149 | 9,799 | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
6,121 | 3,709 | 7,619 | 3,594 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
8,309 | 4,981 | 10,530 | 6,205 | ||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
| (758 | ) | | (2,192 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income attributable to iPayment, Inc. |
$ | 8,309 | $ | 4,223 | $ | 10,530 | $ | 4,013 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
Six Months | Six Months | |||||||
Ended | Ended | |||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 10,530 | $ | 6,205 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
20,775 | 24,121 | ||||||
Noncash interest expense |
1,292 | 1,292 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities, excluding
effects of acquisitions: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
460 | 1,237 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
356 | 522 | ||||||
Other assets |
(1,433 | ) | (154 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable and income taxes payable |
(3,547 | ) | (6,002 | ) | ||||
Accrued liabilities and other |
(4,703 | ) | (260 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
23,730 | 26,961 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||
Change in restricted cash |
12 | (37 | ) | |||||
Expenditures for property and equipment |
(1,309 | ) | (628 | ) | ||||
Investment in merchant advances, net |
| 3,780 | ||||||
Payments related to businesses previously acquired |
| (2,456 | ) | |||||
Payments for prepaid residual expenses |
(4,484 | ) | (1,977 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(5,781 | ) | (1,318 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||
Net (repayments) borrowings on line of credit |
(10,450 | ) | | |||||
Repayments of debt |
(7,500 | ) | (27,000 | ) | ||||
Distributions to non controlling interest in
equity of consolidated subsidiary |
| (1,200 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(17,950 | ) | (28,200 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(1 | ) | (2,557 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
2 | 3,589 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 1 | $ | 1,032 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for income taxes |
$ | 10,520 | $ | 10,289 | ||||
Cash paid during the period for interest |
$ | 21,679 | $ | 22,334 | ||||
Supplemental schedule of non-cash activities: |
||||||||
Accrual of deferred payments for acquisitions of
businesses with a corresponding increase in
goodwill |
$ | | $ | 278 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(1) Organization and Business and Basis of Presentation
Organization and Business
iPayment, Inc. (iPayment) was originally incorporated as iPayment Holdings, Inc. in
Tennessee in 2001 and was reincorporated in Delaware under the name iPayment, Inc. in 2002.
iPayment is a provider of card-based payment processing services to small business merchants
located across the United States. We enable merchants to accept credit and debit cards as payment
for their products and services by providing card authorization, data capture, settlement, risk
management, fraud detection and chargeback services. Our services also include data organization
and retrieval, ongoing merchant assistance and resolution support in connection with disputes with
cardholders. We market and sell our services primarily through independent sales groups.
On May 10, 2006, the Company completed its merger transaction with iPayment Holdings, Inc.
(Holdings) pursuant to which iPayment MergerCo, Inc. (MergerCo) was merged with and into the
Company, with the Company remaining as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Holdings (the Transaction). The Transaction has been accounted for as a purchase at the parent
company level (Holdings), with the related purchase accounting adjustments pushed down to the
Company.
We have significant outstanding long-term debt as of June 30, 2010. The terms of our
long-term debt contain various nonfinancial and financial covenants as further described in Note 4.
If we do not comply with these covenants or cannot cure a noncompliance, when the underlying
debt agreement allows for a cure, our debt becomes immediately due and payable. We currently do
not have available cash and similar liquid resources available to repay our debt obligations if
they were to become immediately due and payable. While we believe we will continue to meet our
debt covenants in the foreseeable future and at least for the year ending December 31, 2010, our
debt to EBITDA ratio (described in Note 4) was close to the allowed maximum of 5.25 to 1.00 as of
June 30, 2010 and is currently expected to remain close to the allowed maximums throughout 2010.
There is a risk that our actual financial results during 2010 could be worse than currently
expected, and, accordingly, there is a possibility we could become noncompliant with our debt
covenants.
As used in these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the terms iPayment, the
Company, we, us, our and similar terms refer to iPayment, Inc. and, unless the context
indicates otherwise, its consolidated subsidiaries.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of iPayment have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). All significant
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. We consolidate our
majority-owned subsidiaries and reflect the minority interest of the portion of the entities that
we do not own as Noncontrolling interest on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our equity interest in
Central Payment Co., LLC (CPC) was sold in the fourth quarter of 2009. Accordingly, we have no
noncontrolling interest at June 30, 2010.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Estimates and
assumptions also affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Substantially all of our revenues are generated from fees charged to merchants for card-based
payment processing services. We typically charge these merchants a bundled rate, primarily based
upon the merchants monthly charge volume and risk profile. Our fees principally consist of
discount fees, which are a percentage of the dollar amount of each credit or debit transaction. We
charge all merchants higher discount rates for card-not-present transactions than for card-present
transactions in order to provide compensation for the higher risk of underwriting these
transactions. We derive the balance of our revenues from a variety of fixed transaction or service
fees, including fees for monthly minimum charge volume requirements, statement fees, annual fees,
payment card industry (PCI) compliance fees, and fees for other miscellaneous services, such as
handling chargebacks. We recognize discounts and other fees related to payment transactions at the
time the merchants transactions are processed. Related interchange and assessment costs are also
recognized at that time. We recognize revenues derived from service fees at the time the service
is performed.
6
Table of Contents
Other Costs of Services
Other costs of services include costs directly attributable to our provision of payment
processing and related services to our merchants such as residual payments to independent sales
groups, which are commissions we pay to these groups based upon a percentage of the net revenues we
generate from their merchant referrals, and assessment fees payable to card associations, which are
a percentage of the processing volume we generate from Visa and MasterCard. In addition, other
costs of services includes telecommunications costs, personnel costs, occupancy costs, losses due
to merchant defaults, other miscellaneous merchant supplies and service expenses, sponsorship costs
and other third-party processing costs.
Financial Instruments
ASC 820 Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures (formerly known as Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements) establishes a framework for
measuring fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value
measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The valuation
hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of
the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:
| Level 1: Observable quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. | ||
| Level 2: Observable quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market. | ||
| Level 3: Model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash-flow models and similar techniques. |
We believe the carrying amounts of financial instruments at June 30, 2010, including cash,
restricted cash and accounts receivable approximate fair value. Due to the short maturities of the
cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable, carrying amounts approximate the respective fair
values. The carrying value of our senior subordinated notes, net of discount, is $193.2 million at
June 30, 2010. We estimate the fair value to be approximately $174.6 million, considering executed
trades occurring around June 30, 2010. The carrying value of the senior secured credit facility is
$440.1 million at June 30, 2010. We estimate the fair value to be approximately $404.9 million,
considering executed trades occurring around June 30, 2010. The fair value of the Companys senior
subordinated notes and senior secured credit facility are estimated using direct and indirect
observable market information and are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, as
defined by ASC 820. The Company is contractually obligated to repay its borrowings in full and the
Company does not believe the creditors under its borrowing arrangements are willing to settle these
instruments with the Company at their estimated fair values indicated herein.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We use certain variable rate debt instruments to finance our operations. These debt
obligations expose us to variability in interest payments due to changes in interest rates. If
interest rates increase, interest expense increases. Conversely, if interest rates decrease,
interest expense also decreases. Management believes it is prudent to limit the variability of our
interest payments.
To meet this objective and to meet certain requirements of our credit agreements, we enter
into certain derivative instruments to manage fluctuations in cash flows resulting from interest
rate risk. These instruments consist solely of interest rate swaps. Under the interest rate
swaps, we receive variable interest rate payments and make fixed interest rate payments, thereby
effectively creating fixed-rate debt. We enter into derivative instruments solely for cash flow
hedging purposes, and we do not speculate using derivative instruments.
The Company accounts for its derivative financial instruments in accordance with ASC 815
Derivatives and Hedging (formerly known as SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities). Under ASC 815, we recognize all derivatives as either other assets or
other liabilities, measured at fair value. The fair value of these instruments at June 30, 2010
was a liability of $6.3 million, and was included as other liabilities in our Consolidated Balance
Sheets. ASC 815 also requires that any ineffectiveness in the hedging relationship, resulting from
differences in the terms of the hedged item and the related derivative, be recognized in earnings
each period. The underlying terms of our interest rate swaps, including the notional amount,
interest rate index, duration, and reset dates, are identical to those of the associated debt
instruments and therefore the hedging relationship results in no material ineffectiveness.
Accordingly, such derivative instruments are classified as cash flow hedges, and any changes in the
fair market value of the derivative instruments are included in accumulated other comprehensive
loss in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The change in the fair value of the derivatives from
December 31, 2009 to June 30, 2010 was $6.1 million, and is reported net of tax expense of $2.5
million in accumulated other comprehensive loss in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
7
Table of Contents
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Purchased merchant processing portfolios are recorded at cost and are evaluated by
management for impairment at the end of each fiscal quarter through review of actual attrition and
cash flows generated by the portfolios in relation to the expected attrition and cash flows and the
recorded amortization expense. The estimated useful lives of our merchant processing portfolios are
assessed by evaluating each portfolio to ensure that the recognition of the costs of revenues,
represented by amortization of the intangible assets, approximate the distribution of the expected
revenues from each processing portfolio. If, upon review, the actual costs of revenues differ from
the expected costs of revenues, we will adjust amortization expense accordingly. Historically, we
have experienced an average monthly volume attrition of approximately 1.0% to 3.0% of our total
charge volume.
We use an accelerated method of amortization over a 15-year period for purchased merchant
processing portfolios. We believe that this method of amortization approximates the distribution
of actual cash flows generated by our merchant processing portfolios. All other intangible assets
are amortized using the straight-line method over an estimated life of 3 to 7 years. For the three
and six months ended June 30, 2010, amortization expense related to our merchant processing
portfolios and other intangible assets was $9.6 million and $19.7 million, respectively. For the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009, amortization expense related to our merchant processing
portfolios and other intangible assets was $11.6 million and $23.0 million, respectively.
In addition, we have implemented both quarterly and annual procedures to determine
whether a significant change in the trend of the current attrition rates being used has occurred on
a portfolio by portfolio basis. In reviewing the current attrition rate trends, we consider
relevant benchmarks such as merchant processing volume, revenues, gross profit and future
expectations of the aforementioned factors compared to historical amounts and rates. If we
identify any significant changes or trends in the attrition rate of any portfolio, we will adjust
our current and prospective estimated attrition rates so that the amortization expense better
approximates the distribution of actual cash flows generated by the merchant processing portfolios.
Any adjustments made to the amortization schedules would be reported in the current Consolidated
Income Statements and on a prospective basis until further evidence becomes apparent. We
identified an unfavorable trend of the current attrition rates being used for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 on some of our portfolios. Accordingly, we recorded an increase to
amortization expense of approximately $0.6 million and $2.1 million, respectively, to better
approximate the distribution of actual cash flows generated by the merchant processing portfolios.
There were no unfavorable trends of the current attrition rates identified for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010. Consequently, there were no related increases to amortization expense
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
Common Stock
As a result of the Transaction (discussed above), the Company has 100 shares of common stock
outstanding at June 30, 2010. We have elected not to present earnings per share data as management
believes such presentation would not be meaningful.
(2) Acquisitions
In November 2009, we entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with CPC, whereby we acquired
a merchant portfolio consisting of approximately 8,000 merchants from CPC. The transaction was
effective as of November 1, 2009. Consideration at closing was $23.8 million in cash. As a result
of the portfolio purchase, we recorded $23.8 million of intangible assets.
There were no acquisitions of businesses during 2010 or 2009 that were significant enough to
require pro forma disclosure. Although the sale of our equity interest in CPC did not require pro
forma disclosure within our financial statements, the Company did provide supplemental financial
information within Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Form 10-K
filed with the SEC on March 26, 2010. We provided pro forma quarterly financial information for
2009 presenting the sale of our equity interest in CPC as if the sale had occurred on January 1,
2009. Within the pro forma results for 2009, we also accounted for the merchant portfolio
acquisition made during the fourth quarter of 2009 as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1,
2009.
(3) Investments
Payments for Prepaid Residual Expenses
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we made payments totaling $4.5 million to several
independent sales groups in exchange for contract modifications which lower our obligations for
future payments of residuals to them. These payments have been assigned to intangible assets in
the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and are amortized over their expected useful lives.
(4) Long-Term Debt
On May 10, 2006, in conjunction with the Transaction further described in Note 1, we replaced
our existing credit facility with a
8
Table of Contents
senior secured credit facility with Bank of America as lead bank. The senior secured credit
facility consists of $515.0 million of term loans and a $60.0 million revolving credit facility,
further expandable to $100.0 million. The senior secured credit facility contains a $25.0 million
letter of credit sublimit and is secured by all of the Companys assets. Interest on outstanding
borrowings under the term loans is payable at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.00% to 2.25%
(currently 2.00%). Interest on outstanding borrowings
under the revolving credit facility is payable at prime plus a margin of 0.50% to 1.25% (currently
1.25%) or at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 1.50% to 2.25% (currently 2.25%) depending on our
ratio of consolidated debt to EBITDA, as defined in the agreement. Additionally, the senior
secured credit facility requires us to pay unused commitment fees of up to 0.50% (currently 0.50%)
on any undrawn amounts under the revolving credit facility. The senior secured credit facility
contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants requiring
maintenance of a debt-to-EBITDA ratio (as defined therein), which is currently 5.25 to 1.00, but
which decreases periodically over the life of the agreement to a ratio of 4.00 to 1.00 at December
31, 2011. We were in compliance with all such covenants as of June 30, 2010. The senior secured
credit facility also contains an excess cash flow covenant (as defined therein), which requires us
to make additional principal payments after the end of every fiscal year. Principal repayments on
the term loans are due quarterly in the amount of $1.3 million, which began on June 30, 2006, with
any remaining unpaid balance due on March 31, 2013. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the
Company paid its excess cash flow sweep and prepaid its quarterly principal payments required by
the senior secured credit facility through the second quarter of 2010. Throughout the remainder of
2009, the Company prepaid the remainder of its quarterly principal payments required by the senior
secured credit facility. Since that time, the Company has repaid an additional $20.4 million of
debt principal beyond the required quarterly principal payments. Outstanding principal balances
on the revolving credit facility are due when the revolving credit facility matures on May 10,
2012. At June 30, 2010, we had outstanding $440.1 million of term loans at a weighted average
interest rate of 5.33% and $0.5 million outstanding under the revolving credit facility at a
weighted average interest rate of 4.5%.
Under the senior secured credit facility we were required to hedge at least 50% of the
outstanding balance through May 10, 2008. Accordingly, we entered into interest rate swap
agreements with a total notional amount of $260.0 million that expire on December 31, 2010. The
swap agreements effectively convert an equivalent portion of our outstanding borrowings to a fixed
rate of 5.39% (plus the current applicable margin of 2.00%) over the entire term of the swaps. The
swap instruments qualify for hedge accounting treatment under ASC 815 Derivatives and Hedging
(see Note 1).
Our senior secured credit facility provides that certain change of control events will result
in an event of default, including the following:
| Gregory S. Daily, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Carl A. Grimstad, our President, and certain other investors (collectively, the Permitted Holders) cease to beneficially own equity interests in iPayment Holdings, Inc. (Holdings) representing more than fifty percent of its voting equity interests; | ||
| during any period of twelve consecutive months, a majority of Holdings Board of Directors ceases to be composed of individuals who were members of Holdings Board of Directors at the beginning of such period or who were elected or nominated by such members or appointees of such members who constituted at least a majority of the Board of Directors at the time of such election or nomination; | ||
| Gregory S. Daily and certain trusts controlled by Mr. Daily cease to beneficially own or control at least a majority of the equity interests in Holdings or any parent company beneficially owned by the Permitted Holders; or | ||
| a change of control occurs under the indenture governing our senior subordinated notes (described below). |
A change of control under the indenture governing our senior subordinated notes includes
the following events:
| any person or group other than one or more of the Permitted Holders or a parent company becomes the beneficial owner of (i) 35% or more of the voting power of our voting stock and (ii) more of the voting power of our voting stock than that beneficially owned by the Permitted Holders; or | ||
| a majority of the members of our Board of Directors cease to be continuing directors. |
An event of default resulting from a change of control could result in the acceleration of the
maturity of our borrowings and terminate commitments to lend under the senior secured credit
facility. An acceleration of our senior secured credit facility would constitute an event of
default under the indenture governing our senior subordinated notes and could result in the
acceleration of our senior subordinated notes.
On May 10, 2006, in conjunction with the Transaction further described in Note 1, we also
issued senior subordinated notes in the aggregate principal amount of $205.0 million. These senior
subordinated notes were issued at a discount of 1.36%, with interest payable semi-annually at 9.75%
on May 15 and November 15 of each year. The senior subordinated notes mature on May 15, 2014, but
may be redeemed, in whole or in part, by the Company at any time on or after May 15, 2010, at
redemption prices specified in the indenture governing the senior subordinated notes, plus accrued
and unpaid interest. The senior subordinated notes contain customary restrictive covenants,
including restrictions on incurrence of additional indebtedness if our fixed charge coverage ratio
(as defined therein) is not at least 2.00 to 1.00. We amended our senior secured credit facility
to allow for repurchases of our senior subordinated notes up to $10.0 million, and have completed
note repurchases under that amendment. At June 30, 2010, we had outstanding $194.5 million of
senior subordinated notes with $1.3 million of remaining unamortized discount on the senior
subordinated notes.
9
Table of Contents
We had net capitalized debt issuance costs related to the senior secured credit facility
totaling $3.2 million and net capitalized debt issuance costs related to the senior subordinated
notes totaling $4.2 million as of June 30, 2010. These costs are being amortized to interest
expense on a straight-line basis over the life of the related debt instruments, which is materially
consistent with amounts computed using an effective interest method. Amortization expense related
to the debt issuance costs was $0.6 million for each of the three month periods ended June 30, 2010
and 2009. Amortization expense related to the debt issuance costs was $1.1 million for each of the
six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Accrued interest related to our debt was $2.6
million and $2.7 million at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, and is included in
Accrued liabilities and other on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(5) Segment Information and Geographical Information
We consider our business activities to be in a single reporting segment as we derive greater
than 90% of our revenue and results of operations from processing revenues and other fees from
card-based payments. We have no single customer that represents 3% or more of revenues.
Substantially all revenues are generated in the United States.
(6) Income Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes (formerly known as SFAS
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes). ASC 740 clarifies the accounting and reporting for
uncertainties in income tax law by prescribing a comprehensive model for the financial statement
recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure for uncertain tax positions taken or expected
to be taken in income tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recorded to reflect the future tax consequences attributable to the effects of differences between
the carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities for finanical reporting and for income tax
purposes.
Our effective income tax rate was 42.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to
36.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Our income before income taxes in 2009 included 100%
of earnings of our former joint venture, CPC, but our income tax expense does not include any tax
expense on the noncontrolling interests share of earnings of CPC. Consequently, our effective tax
rate increased as a result of our sale of our equity interest in CPC in the fourth quarter of 2009.
During the first six months of 2010 and 2009, we accrued less than $0.1 million of interest
related to our uncertain tax positions. As of June 30, 2010, our liabilities for unrecognized tax
benefits totaled $1.4 million and are included in other long-term liabilities in our Consolidated
Balance Sheets. Interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities are included in income
tax expense. The balance of accrued interest and penalties recorded in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets at June 30, 2010 was $0.1 million.
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions.
With limited exception, we are no longer subject to federal, state and local income tax audits by
taxing authorities for the years prior to and through 2004.
At June 30, 2010, we had approximately $2.7 million of federal net operating loss
carryforwards that will be available to offset regular taxable income through 2018, subject to
annual limitations of up to $0.9 million per year. We had state net operating loss carryforwards
of approximately $29.7 million as of June 30, 2010.
(7) Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as net income (loss) plus the net-of-tax impact of fair
market value changes in our interest rate swap agreements. The accumulated elements of other
comprehensive loss, net of tax, are included within stockholders equity on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. Comprehensive income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010 was $1.2
million and $2.1 million, respectively. Changes in fair value, net of tax, on our swap agreements
amounted to $1.2 million and $2.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010,
respectively. The deferred tax expense was $0.8 million and $1.4 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
Comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010 was $2.3 million and $3.7
million, respectively. Changes in fair value, net of tax, on our swap agreements amounted to $2.3
million and $3.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively. The
deferred tax expense was $1.5 million and $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2010, respectively.
(8) Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Proceedings
We are subject to certain legal proceedings that have arisen in the ordinary course of our
business and have not been fully adjudicated. Although the ultimate outcome of these other legal
proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, based on information
10
Table of Contents
currently available, advice of counsel, and available insurance coverage, in our opinion, the
outcome of such legal proceedings is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition or results of operations. However, the results of legal proceedings
cannot be predicted with certainty and in the event of unexpected future developments, it is
possible that the ultimate resolution of one or more of these matters could be unfavorable. Should
we fail to prevail in any of these legal matters or should several of these legal matters be
resolved against us in the same reporting period, our consolidated financial position or operating
results could be materially adversely affected. Regardless of the outcome, any litigation may
require us to incur significant litigation expenses and may result in significant diversion of
managements attention. All litigation settlements are recorded within Other expense on our
Consolidated Income Statements.
(9) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Company did not adopt any new accounting pronouncements during the second quarter of 2010.
Please refer to our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed on Form 10-K with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 2010, for all recent accounting pronouncements
adopted.
(10) Related Party Transactions
At June 30, 2010, we had a receivable of $1.2 million due from our parent company, iPayment
Investors, LP, included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets within Accounts receivable. As
described in Note 12 below, in August 2010, iPayment, Inc. paid a $1.0 million dividend to iPayment
Investors, LP. Subsequent to the dividend payment, iPayment Investors, LP settled $1.0 million of
the outstanding intercompany receivable.
(11) Significant Developments
In May 2009, a jury in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los
Angeles handed down a verdict in the amount of $300 million, plus punitive damages in the amount of
$50 million, against Mr. Daily in connection with litigation over Mr. Dailys beneficial ownership
in us. In response to the verdict, Mr. Daily filed for personal bankruptcy protection under
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in Nashville, Tennessee. On April 8, 2010, the
bankruptcy court ordered the appointment of a trustee to administer the estate of Mr. Daily.
(12) Subsequent Events
In August 2010, the Board of Directors of iPayment, Inc. declared a $1.0 million dividend to
our parent company, iPayment Investors, LP, to cover operating costs. The dividend was required by
iPayment Investors, LP to cover certain operating and legal costs, including reimbursement to the
Company of certain costs previously paid for by the Company on behalf of iPayment Investors, LP.
11
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A)
Forward-Looking Statements May Prove Inaccurate
This report includes various forward-looking statements regarding the Company that are subject
to risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, the factors set forth below and under
the caption Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 26, 2010.
These factors could affect our future financial results and could cause actual results to differ
materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements contained or incorporated by
reference in this document. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to,
discussions regarding our operating strategy, growth strategy, acquisition strategy, cost savings
initiatives, industry, economic conditions, financial condition, liquidity and capital resources
and results of operations. Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements preceded
by, followed by or that otherwise include the words believes, expects, anticipates,
intends, estimates or similar expressions. For those statements, we claim the protection of
the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995.
Executive Overview
We are a provider of credit and debit card-based payment processing services focused on small
merchants across the United States. As of June 30, 2010, we provided our services to approximately
135,000 small merchants located across the United States. Our payment processing services enable
our merchants to accept credit cards as well as other forms of card-based payment, including debit
cards, checks, gift cards and loyalty programs in both traditional card-present, or swipe
transactions, as well as card-not-present transactions. We market and sell our services primarily
through independent sales groups, which gives us a non-employee, external sales force. We
outsource certain processing functions such as card authorization, data capture and merchant
accounting to third party processors such as First Data Merchant Services Corporation (FDMS) and
TSYS Acquiring Solutions, and we rely on banks such as Wells Fargo to sponsor us for membership in
the Visa and MasterCard associations and to settle transactions with merchants. We perform core
functions for small merchants such as processing, risk management, fraud detection, merchant
assistance and support and chargeback services, in our main operating center in Westlake Village,
California.
Our strategy has been to increase profits by increasing our penetration of the expanding small
merchant marketplace for payment services. We find merchants primarily through our relationships
with independent sales groups and have made acquisitions on an opportunistic basis in the
fragmented small merchant segment of the industry. Charge volume decreased to $11,394 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2010 from $11,828 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Revenues decreased to $343.5 million in the first six months of 2010 from $360.8 million in the
same period of the prior year. The decrease in revenues was largely due to the deconsolidation of
CPC after the sale of our equity interest in the fourth quarter of 2009. Revenues for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 were $350.4 million when the revenues of CPC are removed and the
financial impact of the merchant portfolio acquisition made during the fourth quarter of 2009 is
included as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2009. The remaining decrease in revenues
was due to lower charge volume associated with a diminished merchant base following the 2009
recession. Income from operations increased to $41.3 million for the six months ended June 30,
2010 from $34.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Income from operations would have
been $33.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 if the operating results of CPC were
removed and the financial impact of the merchant portfolio acquisition was included as if the
acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2009. Income from operations increased due to lower
depreciation and amortization and reductions in processing costs when the consolidated results of
CPC are removed and we include the merchant portfolio acquisition as if the acquisition had
occurred on January 1, 2009.
Critical Accounting Policies
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require that management make
numerous estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates and
assumptions, impacting our reported results of operations and financial position. The critical
accounting policies described here are those that are most important to the depiction of our
financial condition and results of operations and their application requires managements most
subjective judgment in making estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.
Accounting for Goodwill and Intangible Assets. We follow ASC 350 Intangibles Goodwill and
Other Topics (formerly known as Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets), which addresses financial accounting and reporting for acquired goodwill
and other intangible assets, and requires that goodwill is no longer subject to amortization over
its estimated useful life. Rather, goodwill is subject to at least an annual assessment for
impairment. If facts and circumstances indicate goodwill may be impaired, we perform a
recoverability evaluation. In accordance with ASC 350, the recoverability analysis is based on fair
value. The calculation of fair value includes a number of estimates and assumptions, including
projections of future income and cash flows, the identification of appropriate market multiples and
the choice of an appropriate discount rate.
12
Table of Contents
We completed our most recent annual goodwill impairment review as of July 31, 2009, and
updated our review as of December 31, 2009, using the present value of future cash flows to
determine whether the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying amount of the net
assets, including goodwill. We determined that no impairment charge to goodwill was required. We
are presently in the process of performing our annual impairment review as of July 31, 2010. We
expect the review to be completed before year-end.
We periodically evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets, in relation to the
respective projected future undiscounted cash flows, to assess recoverability. An impairment loss
is recognized if the sum of the expected net cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the
long-lived assets being evaluated. The difference between the carrying amount of the long-lived
assets being evaluated and the fair value, calculated as the sum of the expected cash flows
discounted at a market rate, represents the impairment loss. We evaluated the carrying value of our
intangible assets as of June 30, 2010, and determined no impairment charge was required.
Purchased merchant processing portfolios are recorded at cost and are evaluated by management
for impairment at the end of each fiscal quarter through review of actual attrition and cash flows
generated by the portfolios in relation to the expected attrition and cash flows and the recorded
amortization expense. The estimated useful lives of our merchant processing portfolios are
assessed by evaluating each portfolio to ensure that the recognition of the costs of revenues,
represented by amortization of the intangible assets, approximate the distribution of the expected
revenues from each processing portfolio. If, upon review, actual attrition and cash flows indicate
impairment of the value of the merchant processing portfolios, an impairment loss would be
recognized. Historically, we have experienced monthly volume attrition ranging from 1.0% to 3.0% of
our total charge volume on our various merchant portfolios. We utilize an accelerated method of
amortization over a fifteen-year period, which we believe approximates the distribution of actual
cash flows generated by our merchant processing portfolios. All other intangible assets are
amortized using the straight-line method over an estimated life of three to seven years.
In addition, we have implemented both quarterly and annual procedures to determine whether a
significant change in the trend of the current attrition rates being used exists on a portfolio by
portfolio basis. In reviewing the current attrition rate trends, we consider relevant
benchmarks such as merchant processing volume, revenues, gross profit and future expectations of
the aforementioned factors compared to historical amounts and rates. If we identify any
significant changes or trends in the attrition rate of any portfolio, we will adjust our current
and prospective estimated attrition rates so that the amortization expense would better approximate
the distribution of actual cash flows generated by the merchant processing portfolios. Any
adjustments made to the amortization schedules would be reported in the current Consolidated Income
Statements and on a prospective basis until further evidence becomes apparent. We identified an
unfavorable trend of the current attrition rates being used during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 on some of our portfolios. Accordingly, we recorded an increase to amortization
expense of approximately $0.6 million and $2.1 million, respectively, to better approximate the
distribution of actual cash flows generated by the merchant processing portfolios.
Revenue and Cost Recognition. Substantially all of our revenues are generated from fees
charged to merchants for card-based payment processing services. We typically charge these
merchants a bundled rate, primarily based upon each merchants monthly charge volume and risk
profile. Our fees principally consist of discount fees, which are a percentage of the dollar
amount of each credit or debit transaction. We charge all merchants higher discount rates for
card-not-present transactions than for card-present transactions in order to compensate ourselves
for the higher risk of underwriting these transactions. We derive the balance of our revenues from
a variety of fixed transaction or service fees, including fees for monthly minimum charge volume
requirements, statement fees, annual fees, payment card industry (PCI) compliance fees, discount
income on merchant advances and fees for other miscellaneous services, such as handling
chargebacks. We recognize discounts and other fees related to payment transactions at the time
the merchants transactions are processed. We recognize revenues derived from service fees at the
time the service is performed. Related interchange and assessment costs are also recognized at
that time.
We follow the requirements of EITF 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal Versus Net as
an Agent, now included in the Revenue Recognition Topic of ASC Topic 605. Generally, where we have
merchant portability, credit risk and ultimate responsibility for the merchant, revenues are
reported at the time of sale on a gross basis equal to the full amount of the discount charged to
the merchant. This amount includes interchange paid to card issuing banks and assessments paid to
payment card associations pursuant to which such parties receive payments based primarily on
processing volume for particular groups of merchants. Interchange fees are set by Visa and
MasterCard and are based on transaction processing volume and are recognized at the time
transactions are processed. Revenues generated from certain agent bank portfolios acquired from
FDMS (the FDMS Agent Bank Portfolio) are reported net of interchange, as required by EITF 99-19,
where we may not have credit risk, portability or the ultimate responsibility for the merchant
accounts.
The most significant component of operating expenses is interchange fees, which are amounts we
pay to the card issuing banks. Interchange fees are based on transaction processing volume and are
recognized at the time transactions are processed.
Other costs of services include costs directly attributable to processing and bank sponsorship
costs. They also include related
13
Table of Contents
costs such as residual payments to independent sales groups, which are commissions we pay to
our independent sales groups based upon a percentage of the net revenues we generate from their
merchant referrals, and assessment fees payable to card associations, which is a percentage of the
charge volume we generate from Visa and MasterCard. In addition, other costs of services include
telecommunications costs, personnel costs, occupancy costs, losses due to merchant defaults, other
miscellaneous merchant supplies and services expenses, bank sponsorship costs and other third-party
processing costs directly attributable to our provision of payment processing and related services
to our merchants.
Other costs of services also include depreciation expense, which is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets, and amortization expense, which
is recognized using an accelerated method over a fifteen-year period. Amortization of intangible
assets results from our acquisitions of portfolios of merchant contracts or acquisitions of a
business where we allocated a portion of the purchase price to the existing merchant processing
portfolios and other intangible assets.
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and wages, as well
as other general administrative expenses such as professional fees.
Reserve for Merchant Losses. Disputes between a cardholder and a merchant periodically arise
as a result of, among other things, cardholder dissatisfaction with merchandise quality or merchant
services. Such disputes may not be resolved in the merchants favor. In these cases, the
transaction is charged back to the merchant, which means the purchase price is refunded to the
customer through the merchants acquiring bank and charged to the merchant. If the merchant has
inadequate funds, we or, under limited circumstances, the acquiring bank and us, must bear the
credit risk for the full amount of the transaction. We evaluate the merchants risk for such
transactions and estimate its potential loss for chargebacks based primarily on historical
experience and other relevant factors and record a loss reserve accordingly. At June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, our reserve for losses on merchant accounts included in accrued liabilities and
other totaled $1.4 million. We believe our reserve for charge-back and other similar
processing-related merchant losses is adequate to cover both the known probable losses but also the
incurred but not yet reported losses at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Noncontrolling Interest. We previously owned a 20% equity interest in a joint venture, Central
Payment Co, LLC (CPC). However, during the fourth quarter of 2009, we sold our 20% equity
interest in CPC for $4.3 million. The sale of our equity interest caused us to deconsolidate CPC
and to record a deferred gain of $2.8 million that will be recognized as income over a three-year
period. As of June 30, 2010, we had $0.9 million of short-term deferred gain within Accrued
liabilities and other and $1.2 million of long-term deferred gain within Other liabilities on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized
$0.2 million and $0.5 million of gain, respectively, within Other income on our Consolidated Income
Statements.
We accounted for our investments pursuant to the provisions of ASC 810 Consolidation
(formerly known as SFAS Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities).
Under this method, if a business enterprise has a controlling financial interest in or is the
primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, the assets, liabilities, and results of the
activities of the variable interest entity should be included in consolidated financial statements
with those of the business enterprise. As a result, we considered CPC a variable interest entity,
and as the primary beneficiary during our time as an equity holder, we consolidated CPC. During
the quarter ended March 31, 2009 and the quarter ended September 30, 2009, CPC made distributions
of profits to the Company and the majority shareholders of CPC. The distributions to the majority
shareholders reduced our noncontrolling interest balance prior to the sale of our equity interest.
Seasonality Trend
Our revenues and earnings are impacted by the volume of consumer usage of credit and debit
cards at the point of sale. For example, we experience increased point of sale activity during the
traditional holiday shopping period in the fourth quarter. Revenues during the first quarter tend
to decrease in comparison to the remaining three quarters of our fiscal year on a same store basis.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have transactions, arrangements and other relationships with unconsolidated entities
that are reasonably likely to affect our liquidity or capital resources. We have no special
purpose or limited purpose entities that provide off-balance sheet financing, liquidity or market
or credit risk support, engage in leasing, hedging, research and development services, or other
relationships that expose us to liability that is not reflected on the face of the financial
statements.
14
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
% of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended | Total | Three months ended | Total | Change | ||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | Revenue | June 30, 2009 | Revenue | Amount | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 183,933 | 100.0 | % | $ | 190,745 | 100.0 | % | $ | (6,812 | ) | (3.6 | ) | |||||||||||
Operating Expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interchange |
98,544 | 53.6 | 103,575 | 54.3 | (5,031 | ) | (4.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other costs of services |
55,902 | 30.4 | 60,774 | 31.9 | (4,872 | ) | (8.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative |
3,006 | 1.6 | 4,940 | 2.6 | (1,934 | ) | (39.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
157,452 | 85.6 | 169,289 | 88.8 | (11,837 | ) | (7.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
26,481 | 14.4 | 21,456 | 11.2 | 5,025 | 23.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
11,449 | 6.2 | 11,694 | 6.1 | (245 | ) | (2.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other expenses, net |
602 | 0.3 | 1,072 | 0.6 | (470 | ) | (43.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total other expense |
12,051 | 6.6 | 12,766 | 6.7 | (715 | ) | (5.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes and earnings
attributable to noncontrolling interests |
14,430 | 7.8 | 8,690 | 4.6 | 5,740 | 66.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
6,121 | 3.3 | 3,709 | 1.9 | 2,412 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
8,309 | 4.5 | 4,981 | 2.6 | 3,328 | 66.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
| | (758 | ) | (0.4 | ) | 758 | (100.00 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net income income attributable to
iPayment, Inc. |
$ | 8,309 | 4.5 | $ | 4,223 | 2.2 | $ | 4,086 | 96.8 | |||||||||||||||
Revenues. Revenues decreased 3.6% to $183.9 million in the second quarter of 2010 from
$190.7 million during the same period in 2009. The decrease in revenues was largely due to the
deconsolidation of CPC after the sale of our equity interest in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Revenues for the second quarter of 2009 were $185.1 million when the revenues of CPC are removed
and the financial impact of the merchant portfolio acquisition made during the fourth quarter of
2009 is included as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2009. The remaining decrease in
revenues was due to continued weakness in charge volume sustained from the 2009 recession. Our
merchant processing volume, which represents the total value of transactions processed by us,
declined 3.9% to $5,853 million during the second quarter of 2010 from $6,091 million during the
same period in 2009, due to a diminished merchant base following the recession.
Interchange Expenses. Interchange expenses decreased 4.9% to $98.5 million in the second
quarter of 2010 from $103.6 million during the same period in 2009. Interchange expenses as a
percentage of total revenues decreased in the second quarter of 2010 from the same period in 2009
due to increases in average fees charged to merchants. Interchange expenses decreased due to
decreased charge volume and due to the deconsolidation of CPC after the sale of our equity interest
in the fourth quarter of 2009. Interchange expenses for the second quarter of 2009 were $100.8
million when the interchange expenses related to CPC are removed and we include the merchant
portfolio acquisition made during the fourth quarter of 2009 as if the acquisition had occurred on
January 1, 2009.
Other Costs of Services. Other costs of services decreased 8.0% to $55.9 million in the second
quarter of 2010 from $60.8 million during the same period in 2009. Other costs of services
represented 30.4% of revenues during the second quarter of 2010 as compared to 31.9% of revenues
during the same period in 2009. The percentage decrease was primarily attributable to lower
depreciation and amortization and reductions in processing costs, partially offset by increased
fees paid to card associations. Other costs of services also decreased due to the deconsolidation
of CPC after the sale of our equity interest in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to
$3.0 million in the second quarter of 2010 as compared to $4.9 million during the same period in
2009. The decrease was due to reduced direct selling expenses resulting from the disposition of
our equity interest in CPC during the fourth quarter of 2009. Selling, general and administrative
expenses for the second quarter of 2009 were $2.9 million without selling, general and
administrative expenses related to CPC.
Other Expense. Other expenses decreased to $12.1 million in the second quarter of 2010 from
$12.8 million during the same period in 2009. Interest expense during the second quarter of 2010
decreased $0.2 million from the same period in 2009, reflecting
15
Table of Contents
lower funded debt and a lower
average interest rate. Other expense during the second quarter of 2010 decreased $0.5 million from
the same period in 2009, primarily due to lower costs associated with legal proceedings.
Income Tax. Income tax expenses were $6.1 million in the second quarter of 2010 compared to a
$3.7 million during the same period in 2009. The increase was due to an increase in taxable income
during the second quarter of 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. Our effective income tax
rate was 42.4% for the second quarter of 2010 compared to 42.7% for the same period in 2009. Due
to our adoption of SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
(SFAS No. 160), now included in ASC 810, our income before income taxes in 2009 included 100% of
earnings of our former joint venture, CPC, but our income tax expense does not include any tax
expense on the noncontrolling interests share of earnings of CPC. Consequently, our effective tax
rate increased as a result of our sale of our equity interest in CPC in the fourth quarter of 2009. Our
effective tax rate in the second quarter of 2009 included additional expenses from tax audits of
prior years. Our effective tax rate in the second quarter of 2010 included expenses related to
certain state tax disputes.
Noncontrolling Interests. There was no net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in
the second quarter of 2010, following the sale of our interest in CPC during the fourth quarter of
2009. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests during the second quarter of 2009 was
$0.8 million.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
% of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Six months ended | Total | Six months ended | Total | Change | ||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | Revenue | June 30, 2009 | Revenue | Amount | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 343,473 | 100.0 | % | $ | 360,798 | 100.0 | % | $ | (17,325 | ) | (4.8 | ) | |||||||||||
Operating Expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interchange |
189,541 | 55.2 | 200,485 | 55.6 | (10,944 | ) | (5.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other costs of services |
106,728 | 31.1 | 116,317 | 32.2 | (9,589 | ) | (8.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative |
5,863 | 1.7 | 9,757 | 2.7 | (3,894 | ) | (39.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
302,132 | 88.0 | 326,559 | 90.5 | (24,427 | ) | (7.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
41,341 | 12.0 | 34,239 | 9.5 | 7,102 | 20.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expenses, net |
22,820 | 6.6 | 23,350 | 6.5 | (530 | ) | (2.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other expenses, net |
372 | 0.2 | 1,090 | 0.3 | (718 | ) | (65.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total other expenses |
23,192 | 6.8 | 24,440 | 6.8 | (1,248 | ) | (5.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
18,149 | 5.3 | 9,799 | 2.7 | 8,350 | 85.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
7,619 | 2.2 | 3,594 | 1.0 | 4,025 | 112.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
10,530 | 3.1 | 6,205 | 1.7 | 4,325 | 69.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
| | (2,192 | ) | (0.6 | ) | 2,192 | (100.00 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to iPayment, Inc. |
$ | 10,530 | 3.1 | $ | 4,013 | 1.1 | $ | 6,517 | 162.4 | |||||||||||||||
Revenues. Revenues decreased 4.8% to $343.5 million in the first six months of 2010 from
$360.8 million during the same period in 2009. Revenues for the first six months of 2009 were
$350.4 million when the revenues of CPC are removed and the financial impact of the merchant
portfolio acquisition made during the fourth quarter of 2009 is included as if the acquisition had
occurred on
January 1, 2009. The remaining decrease in revenues was due to continued weakness in charge
volume sustained from the 2009 recession. Our merchant processing volume, which represents the
total value of transactions processed by us, declined 3.7% to $11,394 million during the first six
months of 2010 from $11,828 million during the same period in 2009, due to a diminished merchant
base following the recession.
Interchange Expenses. Interchange expenses decreased 5.5% to $189.5 million in the first six
months of 2010 from $200.5 million during the same period in 2009. Interchange expenses decreased
due to decreased charge volume and due to the deconsolidation of CPC after the sale of our equity
interest in the fourth quarter of 2009. Interchange expenses for the first six months of 2009 were
$196.1 million when the interchange expenses related to CPC are removed and we include the merchant
portfolio acquisition made during the fourth quarter of 2009 as if the acquisition had occurred on
January 1, 2009. Interchange expenses as a percentage of total revenues decreased slightly to
55.2% during the first six months of 2010 as compared to 55.6% during the same period in 2009 due
to increases in average fees charged to merchants.
16
Table of Contents
Other Costs of Services. Other costs of services decreased 8.2% to $106.7 million in the first
six months of 2010 from $116.3 million during the same period in 2009, corresponding with lower
revenues. Other costs of services represented 31.1% of revenues during the first six months of
2010 as compared to 32.2% of revenues during the same period in 2009. The percentage decrease was
primarily attributable to lower depreciation and amortization and reductions in processing costs,
partially offset by increased fees paid to card associations. Other costs of services also
decreased due to the deconsolidation of CPC after the sale of our equity interest in the fourth
quarter of 2009.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to
$5.9 million in the first six months of 2010 compared to $9.8 million during the same period in
2009. The decrease was due to reduced direct selling expenses resulting from the disposition of
our equity interest in CPC during the fourth quarter of 2009. Selling, general and administrative
expenses for the first six months of 2009 were $5.8 million without selling, general and
administrative expenses related to CPC.
Other Expenses. Other expenses decreased to $23.2 million in the first six months of 2009 from
$24.4 million during the same period in 2008. Interest expenses during the six months ended June
30, 2010 decreased $0.5 million from the same period in 2009, reflecting lower funded debt and a
lower average interest rate. Other expense during the six months ended June 30, 2010 decreased
$0.7 million from the same period in 2009, due to $0.5 million of other income recognized related
to the deferred gain from the sale of CPC and lower costs associated with legal proceedings.
Income Tax. Income tax expenses increased to $7.6 million in the first six months of 2010 from
$3.6 million during the same period in 2009. The change was primarily due to an increase in
taxable income. Income tax expenses as a percentage of income before taxes was 42.0% during the
first six months of 2010 as compared to 36.7% during the same period in 2009. Due to our adoption
of SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (SFAS No. 160),
now included in ASC 810, our income before income taxes in 2009 included 100% of earnings of our
former joint venture, CPC, but our income tax expense does not include any tax expense on the
noncontrolling interests share of earnings of CPC. Consequently, our effective tax rate increased
as a result of our sale of our equity interest in CPC in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Noncontrolling Interests. There was no net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in
the first six months of 2010, following the sale of our interest in CPC during the fourth quarter
of 2009. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests during the first six months of 2009
was $2.2 million.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents of less than
$0.1 million. We usually minimize cash balances in order to minimize borrowings and, therefore,
interest expense. We had net working capital (current assets in excess of current liabilities) of
$0.7 million as of June 30, 2010, compared to a net working capital deficit (current liabilities in
excess of current assets) of $6.6 million as of December 31, 2009. The working capital increase
consisted primarily of a reduction in accrued liabilities and other of $4.5 million, primarily
composed of payments of accrued bonuses of $3.8 million, a reduction in income taxes payable of
$3.0 million, and a reduction of accounts payable of $0.6 million, partially offset by a reduction
in accounts receivable of $0.5 million.
We consistently have positive cash flow provided by operations and expect that our cash flow
from operations and proceeds from borrowings under our revolving credit facility will be our
primary sources of liquidity and will be sufficient to cover our current obligations. See
Contractual Obligations below for a description of future required uses of cash.
We have significant outstanding long-term debt as of June 30, 2010. The terms of our
long-term debt contain various nonfinancial and financial covenants as further described in the
following paragraphs. If we do not comply with these covenants or
cannot cure a noncompliance, when the underlying debt agreement allows for a cure, our
debt becomes immediately due and payable. We currently do not have available cash and similar
liquid resources available to repay our debt obligations if they were to become immediately due and
payable. Our debt to EBITDA covenant was close to the allowed maximum of 5.25 to 1.00 as of June
30, 2010 and is currently expected to remain close to the allowed maximums throughout 2010. We
believe we will continue to meet our debt covenants in the foreseeable future and at least for the
year ending December 31, 2010. The recessionary environment and credit contraction in 2009
affected cardholder spending behavior. Industry charge volume and our charge volume weakened in
2009. During 2009, we also noted decreases in average transaction values and increases in the
attrition of our various merchant portfolios. We expect these trends to moderate in 2010. There
is, however, a risk that these negative trends will continue, which would lead to deterioration in
our operating performance and cash flow, and that our actual financial results during 2010 could be
worse than currently expected. If such deterioration were to occur, there is a possibility we may
experience noncompliance with our debt covenants. Any amendment to or waiver of our debt covenants
would likely involve substantial upfront fees, significantly higher annual interest costs and other
terms significantly less favorable to us than those contained in our current credit facilities.
17
Table of Contents
Operating activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $23.7 million during the first six months of
2010, consisting of net income of $10.5 million adjusted by depreciation and amortization of $20.8
million, non-cash interest expense of $1.3 million, and a net unfavorable change in operating
assets and liabilities of $8.9 million. The net unfavorable change in operating assets and
liabilities was primarily caused by decreases in accrued liabilities and other composed primarily
of payments of accrued bonuses, decreases in accounts payable due to the seasonality of the timing
of payments and decreases in income taxes payable due to tax payments made in the first six months
of 2010.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $27.0 million during the first six months of
2009, consisting of net income of $6.2 million adjusted by depreciation and amortization of $24.1
million, non-cash interest expense of $1.3 million and a net unfavorable change in working capital
of $4.7 million due primarily to the reduction of the tax liability of $7.0 million.
Investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $5.8 million during the first six months of 2010.
Net cash used in investing activities consisted of $4.5 million of payments for contract
modifications for prepaid residual expenses and $1.3 million of capital expenditures. Other than
contingent earnout payments described under Contractual Obligations, we currently have no
material capital spending or purchase commitments, but expect to continue to engage in capital
spending in the ordinary course of business.
Net cash used in investing activities was $1.3 million during the first six months of 2009.
Net cash used in investing activities consisted of $2.5 million paid for earnout payments
associated with acquisitions from a prior period, $2.0 million of payments for contract
modifications for prepaid residual expenses, and $0.6 million of capital expenditures, partially
offset by a $3.8 million reduction in investments in merchant advances. The reduction in
investments in merchant advances is due to the Companys decision to discontinue making new
advances under the program in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Financing activities
Net cash used in financing activities was $18.0 million during the first six months of 2010,
consisting $18.0 million of net repayments on our long-term debt.
Net cash used in financing activities was $28.2 million during the first six months of 2009,
primarily consisting of $27.0 million of net repayments on our long-term debt and a $1.2 million
distribution paid to the majority shareholders of our former joint venture, CPC.
See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail on the Companys
long-term debt.
Contractual Obligations
The following table of our material contractual obligations as of June 30, 2010, summarizes
the aggregate effect that these obligations are expected to have on our cash flows in the periods
indicated. The table excludes contingent payments in connection with earnouts related to completed
acquisitions. We cannot quantify the exact amounts to be paid because they are based on future
results. We currently estimate that the maximum we will pay in earnout payments will be an
aggregate of less than $3.0 million in 2010 and 2011 combined.
Payments due by period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Credit Facility |
$ | 440,588 | $ | | $ | 440,588 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Senior Subordinated Notes |
194,500 | | | 194,500 | | |||||||||||||||
Interest (1) |
111,732 | 36,711 | 58,428 | 16,593 | | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations |
9,205 | 1,375 | 2,125 | 1,832 | 3,873 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations (2)(3)(4) |
7,829 | 4,456 | 3,373 | | | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations |
$ | 763,854 | $ | 42,542 | $ | 504,514 | $ | 212,925 | $ | 3,873 | ||||||||||
18
Table of Contents
(1) | Future interest obligations are calculated using current interest rates on existing debt balances as of June 30, 2010, and assume no principal reduction other than mandatory principal repayments in accordance with the terms of the debt instruments as described in Note 4 in our consolidated financial statements. | |
(2) | Purchase obligations represent costs of contractually guaranteed minimum processing volumes with certain of our third-party transactions processors. | |
(3) | We are required to pay FDMS an annual processing fee through 2011 related to an FDMS Merchant Portfolio and the FDMS Agent Bank Portfolio which fee will be at least $4.3 million in fiscal year 2010, and at least 70% of the amount of such fee paid to FDMS in 2010 in fiscal 2011. The minimum commitment for years after 2010, included in the table above, is based on the preceding year minimum amounts. The actual minimum commitments for such years may vary based on actual results in preceding years. | |
(4) | We have agreed to utilize First Data to process at least 75% of our consolidated transaction sales volume in any calendar year through 2011. The minimum commitments for such years are not calculable as of June 30, 2010, and are excluded from this table. |
We expect to be able to fund our operations, capital expenditures and the contractual
obligations above (other than repayment of our senior secured credit facility and revolving credit
facility) using our cash from operations. We intend to use our revolving credit facility primarily
to fund additional acquisition opportunities as they arise. To the extent we are unable to fund our
operations, capital expenditures and the contractual obligations above using cash from operations,
we intend to use borrowings under our revolving credit facility or future debt or equity
financings. In addition, we may seek to sell additional equity or arrange debt financing to give us
financial flexibility to pursue attractive funding opportunities that may arise in the future. If
we raise additional funds through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, these
transactions may dilute the value of our outstanding common stock. We may also decide to issue
securities, including debt securities, which have rights, preferences and privileges senior to our
common stock. If future financing is not available or is not available on acceptable terms, we may
not be able to fund our future needs, which may prevent us from increasing our market share,
capitalizing on new business opportunities or remaining competitive in our industry.
Effects of Inflation
Our monetary assets, consisting primarily of cash and receivables, are not significantly
affected by inflation. Our non-monetary assets, consisting primarily of intangible assets and
goodwill, are not affected by inflation. We believe that replacement costs of equipment, furniture
and leasehold improvements will not materially affect our operations. However, the rate of
inflation affects our expenses, such as those for employee compensation and telecommunications,
which may not be readily recoverable in the price of services offered by us.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
Our monetary assets, consisting primarily of cash and receivables, are not significantly
affected by inflation. Our non-monetary assets, consisting primarily of intangible assets and
goodwill, are not affected by inflation. We believe that replacement costs of equipment, furniture
and leasehold improvements will not materially affect our operations. However, the rate of
inflation affects our expenses, such as those for employee compensation and telecommunications,
which may not be readily recoverable in the price of services offered by us.
We transact business with merchants exclusively in the United States and receive payment for
our services exclusively in United States dollars. As a result, our financial results are unlikely
to be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic
conditions in foreign markets.
Our interest expense is sensitive to changes in the general level of interest rates in the
United States, because a majority of our indebtedness is at variable rates. As of June 30, 2010,
$440.1 million of our outstanding indebtedness was at variable interest rates based on LIBOR. Of
this amount, $260.0 million was effectively fixed through the use of interest rate swaps that
expire on December 31, 2010. A rise in LIBOR rates of one percentage point would result in net
additional annual interest expense of $3.1 million.
We hold certain derivative financial instruments for the sole purpose of hedging our exposure
to interest rate risk. We do not hold any other derivative financial or commodity instruments, nor
engage in any foreign currency denominated transactions, and all of our cash and cash equivalents
are held in money market and checking funds.
19
Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. An evaluation was conducted under
the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of June 30, 2010. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
(the Exchange Act)) were effective as of such date to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission
rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including
our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosures.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There was no change in our
internal control over financial reporting during the first two fiscal quarters of 2010 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
20
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
L. Green d/b/a Tisas Cakes v. Northern Leasing Systems, Inc., Online Data Corporation, and
iPayment, Inc.,, United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, Case
No. 09CV05679-RJD-SMG.
This matter was initially reported in our Quarterly Report for the first quarter ended March
31, 2010, filed on Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 12, 2010. As
previously reported, this matter relates to a purported class action lawsuit filed by plaintiff L.
Green d/b/a Tisas Cakes in December 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
New York, naming us, Online Data Corporation (ODC), one of our subsidiaries, and Northern Leasing
Systems, Inc. (NLS) as defendants. Since we last reported on this matter, on June 16, 2010, we
filed a motion to dismiss Counts One (violation of New York Consumer Protection Law Gen. Bus. Law §
349) and Two (unjust enrichment) of plaintiffs class action complaint (the Complaint) and, on
June 21, 2010, a conference with the Court was held at which time the Court ordered a stay of
discovery until the court decides the motion to dismiss. The Court has scheduled a conference for
August 27, 2010, but has not yet ruled on our motion to dismiss nor has it set a hearing date, if
any, for the motion to dismiss. Although we currently intend to vigorously defend ourselves and
currently believe that we have meritorious defenses to the claims asserted, at this time the
ultimate outcome of the lawsuit and our potential liability associated with the claims asserted
against us cannot be predicted with certainty, and there can be no assurance that we will be
successful in our defense or that a failure to prevail will not have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Sharyns Jewelers, LLC v. iPayment, Inc., iPayment of Valencia, Vericomm and JP Morgan Chase
Bank, General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, County of Carteret, State of North
Carolina, File No.: 05-CVS-92 / and related cases; Judgment Recovery Group, LLC, as assignee of
Sharyns Jewelers, LLC, v. iPayment, Inc., iPayment of Valencia, Vericomm, and JP Morgan Chase
Bank, Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No.: PS 009919 and
Judgment Recovery Group, LLC, as assignee of Sharyns Jewelers, LLC, v. iPayment, Inc.,
iPayment of Valencia, Vericomm, and JP Morgan Chase Bank, Superior Court of the State of
California, County of Los Angeles, Case No.: PS 012624.
These related matters were initially reported in our Quarterly Report for the third quarter
ended September 30, 2007, filed on Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
November 13, 2007, and were last updated in our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2009,
filed on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 2010. As previously
reported, these matters relate to a lawsuit filed in January 2005 in North Carolina by plaintiff
Sharyns Jewelers, LLC, a merchant, naming as defendants, iPayment, Inc. and iPayment of Valencia
(the iPayment Defendants) and third parties Vericomm, an independent outside sales organization,
and JPMorgan Chase Bank (Chase) and a subsequent default judgment entered against us (and
Vericomm), imposing joint and several liability, for a total judgment amount of $359,700 (the
North Carolina Judgment). Plaintiff then assigned its judgment to Judgment Recovery Group, LLC
(JRG) and, on or about August 9, 2007, JRG commenced an action in California state court (the
California Action) for entry of sister state judgment (the Sister State Judgment) in the amount
of $404,200. We timely filed a motion to vacate the California-issued Sister State Judgment and
filed an application to stay enforcement of the judgment, which was granted. On June 12, 2009,
JRG filed in the California Action a proposed Amended Judgment against Vericomm in the amount of
$93,500 and against the iPayment Defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of $452,800,
which the Court signed and entered on June 12, 2009 (the California Amended Judgment). We and
Vericomm then each filed a Motion to Vacate the California Amended Judgment and at a March 15,
2010, hearing on the motions to vacate the California Amended Judgment, the Court ruled that JRG
had to domesticate the latest amended judgment issued by the trial court in North Carolina and that
it would have to file a new application for entry of sister state judgment. Since we last reported
on these related matters, JRG commenced a related action in California state court (the Related
California Action) for entry of sister state judgment, as amended, against Vericomm in the amount
of $98,744 and against the iPayment Defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of $478,010,
which the Court signed and entered on May 13, 2010 (the May 2010 California Judgment). We were
served with the May 2010 California Judgment on July 27, 2010 and we currently intend to timely
file a motion to vacate the May 2010 California Judgment. The Related California Action
Application for Entry of Sister State Judgment was assigned a new case number, but it will
nonetheless be deemed related to the earlier case and be heard and handled by the judge assigned
to the earlier case. There is a Status Conference scheduled for August 17, 2010, and the parties
have agreed that the time to file Motions to Vacate the May 2010 California Judgment will not begin
to be calculated until the parties discuss a briefing schedule and hearing date with the Court at
the Status Conference on August 17, 2010. We continue to believe that we have grounds to have the
May 2010 California Judgment vacated or modified and/or to obtain substantial relief from any
execution for enforcement of the May 2010 California Judgment
should it become final. There can be no assurance that we will be
successful or prevail in our defense, or that a failure to prevail
will not have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition or results of operations.
We are also subject to certain other legal proceedings that have arisen in the ordinary course
of our business and have not been
21
Table of Contents
fully adjudicated. Although the ultimate outcome of these other legal proceedings cannot be
predicted with certainty, based on information currently available, advice of counsel, and
available insurance coverage, in our opinion, the outcome of such legal proceedings is not expected
to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
However, the results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty and in the event of
unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of one or more of these
matters could be unfavorable. Should we fail to prevail in any of these legal matters or should
several of these legal matters be resolved against us in the same reporting period, our
consolidated financial position or operating results could be materially adversely affected.
Regardless of the outcome, any litigation may require us to incur significant litigation expenses
and may result in significant diversion of managements attention. All litigation settlements are
recorded within Other expense on our Consolidated Income Statements.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
As further described in Note 11to the Consolidated Financial Statements, a trustee has been
appointed to administer the estate of Mr. Daily, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, in
connection with his filing for personal bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code. As was stated in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009, the appointment of a trustee by the bankruptcy court could result in one
or more of the change of control events under our senior secured credit facility, which would
constitute an event of default under our senior secured credit facility. An event of default
resulting from a change of control permits the required lenders to accelerate the maturity of our
borrowings and terminate commitments to lend. An acceleration of our senior secured credit
facility would constitute an event of default under the indenture governing our senior subordinated
notes and could result in the acceleration of the senior subordinated notes. If an event of
default under our senior secured credit facility were to occur, we could seek the consent of the
required lenders to waive the event of default or attempt to refinance such facility, but there can
be no assurance that we would be able to do so. The credit crisis may make it particularly
difficult and expensive to obtain any such waiver or to refinance our existing debt and, if we were
able to do so, our indebtedness may subject us to more onerous terms. These consequences of a
change of control could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition or
results of operations.
Any new or changes made to laws, regulations, card network rules or other industry standards
affecting our business may have an unfavorable impact on our financial results.
We are subject to regulations that affect the electronic payments industry. Regulation
and proposed regulation of the payments industry has increased significantly in recent years.
Failure to comply with regulations may result in the suspension or revocation of a license or
registration, the limitation, suspension or termination of service, and the imposition of civil and
criminal penalties, including fines which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition.
We are subject to the card network rules of Visa, MasterCard, and of various other credit and debit
networks. We are also subject to the Housing Assistance Tax Act of 2008, which requires
information returns to be made for each calendar year by merchant acquiring entities starting in
2011.
Interchange fees (which are typically paid by the acquirer to the issuer in connection
with transactions) are subject to increasingly intense legal, regulatory, and legislative scrutiny.
For instance, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act has recently been
signed into law to regulate the fees charged or received by issuers for processing debit
transactions. Regulatory actions such as these, even if not directed at us, may require us to make
significant efforts to change our products and may require that we change how we price our
services to customers. We cannot predict the impact of any of these changes on our operations and
financial condition.
Please see the additional risk factors set forth in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 for the various risks that could have a negative effect
on our business, financial position, cash flows and results of operations.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
22
Table of Contents
Item 5. | Other Information |
Executive Compensation
The Board of Directors determined to increase the annual base salaries of Messrs. Daily and
Grimstad, to $1.0 million each as of June 1, 2010. During 2009, Mr. Daily received an annualized
salary of $300,000 and Mr. Grimstad received an annual salary of $300,000.
On November 10, 2008, Gregory S. Daily, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Carl A.
Grimstad, our President, each provided us with notice of their intention to not renew their
respective employment agreements with us. Accordingly, Messrs. Dailys and Grimstads respective
employment agreements terminated on February 25, 2009 pursuant to their terms. Following the
termination of their employment agreements, Messrs. Daily and Grimstad have continued to serve as
our Chief Executive Officer and President, respectively, pursuant to at-will employment
arrangements.
Included below is background information on Mr. Daily and Mr. Grimstad.
Name and Age | Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships | |
Gregory S. Daily Chairman and CEO Age 51 |
Greg Daily has served as Chairman of the board of directors and Chief Executive Officer since February 2001. In 1984, Mr. Daily co-founded PMT Services, Inc., a credit card processing company, and served as President of PMT Services, Inc. Mr. Daily served as the Vice-Chairman of the board of directors of NOVA Corporation from September 1998 until May 2001. Mr. Daily has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Hardsworth, LLC, a private investment company, since May 1997. | |
Carl A. Grimstad Director and President Age 42 |
Carl Grimstad co-founded iPayment and has served as the Companys President since inception. In 2003, Mr. Grimstad led iPayment in a successful IPO (NASDAQ: IPMT). Mr. Grimstad was instrumental in taking iPayment private in 2006. Mr. Grimstad has served since 1995 as the managing partner of GS Capital, LLC, a private investment company. Mr. Grimstad and his family are active supporters of various charities including the Nashville Zoo and the Sexual Assault Center. Mr. Grimstad currently serves as a trustee of the Cheekwood Botanical Gardens, as a board member of the Nashville Symphony and as a board member of the Oasis Center, a safe haven for children in trouble. Mr. Grimstad graduated with a B.A. in Economics from Boston University in 1989. |
Item 6. | Exhibits |
The exhibits to this report are listed in the Exhibit Index.
23
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
iPayment, Inc. |
||||
Date: August 13, 2010 | By: | /s/ Gregory S. Daily | ||
Gregory S. Daily | ||||
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
||||
Date: August 13, 2010 | By: | /s/ Clay M. Whitson | ||
Clay M. Whitson | ||||
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
24
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | Description | |
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a 14(a) (as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), filed herewith. | |
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a 14(a) (as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), filed herewith. | |
32.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a 14(b) and 18 U.S.C. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), filed herewith. | |
32.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a 14(b) and 18 U.S.C. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), filed herewith. |
25