Chaparral Energy, Inc. - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION BY CFO REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(A) AND 15D-14(A) - Chaparral Energy, Inc.	dex312.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION BY CEO REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(A) AND 15D-14(A) - Chaparral Energy, Inc.	dex311.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION BY CEO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 - Chaparral Energy, Inc.	dex321.htm
EX-10.28 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO EIGHTH RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT - Chaparral Energy, Inc.	dex1028.htm
EX-32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 - Chaparral Energy, Inc.	dex322.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 333-134748

Chaparral Energy, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		73-1590941
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

701 Cedar Lake Boulevard Oklahoma City, Oklahoma		73114
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip code)

(405) 478-8770

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¨ No x

(Explanatory Note: The registrant is a voluntary filer and is not subject to the filing requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. However, during the preceding 12 months, the registrant has filed all reports that it would have been required to file by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934 if the registrant was subject to the filing requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer ¨ Accelerated Filer ¨ Non-Accelerated Filer x Smaller Reporting Company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

1,401,376 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding as of August 10, 2010.

CHAPARRAL ENERGY, INC.

Index to Form 10-Q


		Page
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009		6
Consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)		8
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)		9
Notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited)		11
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		34
Overview		34
Liquidity and capital resources		36
Results of operations		41
Non-GAAP financial measure and reconciliation		51
Critical accounting policies and estimates		53
Recent accounting pronouncements		55
Item 3. Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk		55
Item 4. Controls and procedures		57
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION		57
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		57
Item 1A. Risk Factors		57
Item 6. Exhibits		58
Signatures		60
EX-31.1 (Certification by CEO required by rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a))
EX-31.2 (Certification by CFO required by rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a))
EX-32.1 (Certification by CEO pursuant to section 906)
EX-32.2 (Certification by CFO pursuant to section 906)

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The statements contained in this report that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future. In addition, any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “would” and similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Forward-looking statements in this report may include, for example, statements about:

•

fluctuations in demand or the prices received for our oil and natural gas;

•

the amount, nature and timing of capital expenditures;

•

drilling of wells;

•

competition and government regulations;

•

timing and amount of future production of oil and natural gas;

•

costs of exploiting and developing our properties and conducting other operations, in the aggregate and on a per unit equivalent basis;

•

increases in proved reserves;

•

operating costs and other expenses;

•

cash flow and anticipated liquidity;

•

estimates of proved reserves;

•

exploitation of property acquisitions; and

•

marketing of oil and natural gas.

The forward-looking statements contained in this report are based on our current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting us will be those that we have anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond our control) and other assumptions that may cause actual results or performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include those factors described under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 14, 2010. Specifically, some factors that could cause actual results to differ include:

•

the significant amount of our debt;

•

worldwide demand for oil and natural gas;

•

volatility and declines in oil and natural gas prices;

•

drilling plans (including scheduled and budgeted wells);

•

the number, timing or results of any wells;

•

changes in wells operated and in reserve estimates;

•

future growth and expansion;

•

future exploration;

•

integration of existing and new technologies into operations;

•

future capital expenditures (or funding thereof) and working capital;

•

borrowings and capital resources and liquidity;

•

changes in strategy and business discipline;

•

future tax matters;

•

any loss of key personnel;

•

future seismic data (including timing and results);

•

the plans for timing, interpretation and results of new or existing seismic surveys or seismic data;

•

geopolitical events affecting oil and natural gas prices;

•

outcome, effects or timing of legal proceedings;

•

the effect of litigation and contingencies; and

•

the ability to generate additional prospects.

Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of our assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects from those projected in these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws. All forward-looking statements included herein are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section.

GLOSSARY OF OIL AND GAS TERMS

The terms defined in this section are used throughout this Form 10-Q:

•

Bbl. One stock tank barrel, or 42 U.S. gallons liquid volume, used herein in reference to crude oil, condensate, or natural gas liquids.

•

BBtu. One billion British thermal units.

•

Bcf. One billion cubic feet of natural gas.

•

Boe. Barrels of oil equivalent using the ratio of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil.

•

Btu. British thermal unit, which is the heat required to raise the temperature of a one-pound mass of water from 58.5 to 59.5 degrees Fahrenheit.

•

Enhanced oil recovery (EOR). The use of any improved recovery method, including injection of CO₂ or polymer, to remove additional oil after secondary recovery.

•

MBbls. One thousand barrels of crude oil, condensate, or natural gas liquids.

•

MBoe. One thousand barrels of crude oil equivalent.

•

Mcf. One thousand cubic feet of natural gas.

•

MMBbls. One million barrels of crude oil, condensate, or natural gas liquids.

•

MMBoe. One million barrels of crude oil equivalent.

•

MMcf. One million cubic feet of natural gas.

•

NYMEX. The New York Mercantile Exchange.

•

PDP. Proved developed producing.

•

Proved reserves. The quantities of oil and natural gas which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible—from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations—prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain.

•

Proved undeveloped reserves. Reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion.

•

SEC. The Securities and Exchange Commission.

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Chaparral Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries

Consolidated balance sheets


(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	June 30, 2010 (unaudited)			December 31, 2009
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	15,999		$	73,417
Accounts receivable, net		50,771			51,969
Inventories		10,880			10,551
Prepaid expenses		1,050			5,729
Derivative instruments		25,190			18,226
Deferred income taxes		—			1,790

Total current assets		103,890			161,682
Property and equipment—at cost, net		63,300			62,197
Oil and natural gas properties, using the full cost method:
Proved		2,041,095			1,910,583
Unproved (excluded from the amortization base)		20,549			19,728
Work in progress (excluded from the amortization base)		9,539			19,206
Accumulated depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment		(950,033	)		(906,584	)

Total oil and natural gas properties		1,121,150			1,042,933
Funds held in escrow		1,657			1,672
Derivative instruments		1,896			5,794
Deferred income taxes		35,978			62,422
Other assets		26,754			17,220

	$	1,354,625		$	1,353,920

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Chaparral Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries

Consolidated balance sheets—(Continued)


(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	June 30, 2010 (unaudited)			December 31, 2009
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	51,654		$	48,283
Accrued payroll and benefits payable		10,828			10,849
Accrued interest payable		14,637			14,394
Revenue distribution payable		16,639			18,673
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital leases		4,380			4,653
Derivative instruments		2,604			20,677
Deferred income taxes		8,626			—

Total current liabilities		109,368			117,529
Long-term debt and capital leases, less current maturities		188,148			524,477
Senior notes, net		647,985			647,877
Derivative instruments		2,334			30,163
Deferred compensation		947			1,142
Asset retirement obligations		38,561			37,165
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 600,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding		—			—
Class A Common stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized and 49,333 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2010 and none authorized, issued, and outstanding as of December 31, 2009		—			—
Class B Common stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized and 357,882 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2010 and none authorized, issued, and outstanding as of December 31, 2009		4			—
Class C Common stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized and 209,882 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2010 and none authorized, issued, and outstanding as of December 31, 2009		2			—
Class D Common stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized and 279,999 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2010 and none authorized, issued, and outstanding as of December 31, 2009		3			—
Class E Common stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized and 504,276 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2010 and none authorized, issued, and outstanding as of December 31, 2009		5			—
Class F Common stock, $.01 par value, 1 share authorized, issued, and outstanding as of June 30, 2010 and none authorized, issued, and outstanding as of December 31, 2009		—			—
Class G Common stock, $.01 par value, 3 shares authorized, issued, and outstanding as of June 30, 2010 and none authorized, issued, and outstanding as of December 31, 2009		—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value, none authorized, issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2010 and 3,000,000 shares authorized and 877,000 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2009		—			9
Additional paid in capital		415,237			100,918
Accumulated deficit		(72,636	)		(122,978	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes		24,667			17,618

		367,282			(4,433	)

	$	1,354,625		$	1,353,920

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Chaparral Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries

Consolidated statements of operations


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2010 (unaudited)			2009 (unaudited)			2010 (unaudited)			2009 (unaudited)
Revenues:
Oil and natural gas sales	$	96,785		$	69,064		$	197,160		$	122,931
Gain (loss) from oil and natural gas hedging activities		(8,206	)		6,188			(13,191	)		21,691
Other revenues		857			661			1,728			1,329

Total revenues		89,436			75,913			185,697			145,951
Costs and expenses:
Lease operating		27,256			23,660			51,675			51,163
Production tax		6,190			4,941			13,180			8,801
Depreciation, depletion and amortization		25,067			25,278			49,588			55,496
Loss on impairment of oil and natural gas properties		—			—			—			240,790
General and administrative		7,871			5,906			14,311			12,274
Litigation settlement		—			—			—			2,928
Other expenses		768			491			1,472			772

Total costs and expenses		67,152			60,276			130,226			372,224
Operating income (loss)		22,284			15,637			55,471			(226,273	)
Non-operating income (expense):
Interest expense		(19,775	)		(22,720	)		(42,327	)		(45,184	)
Non-hedge derivative gains (losses)		39,860			(33,019	)		70,917			17,308
Financing costs		(1,263	)		—			(1,560	)		—
Other income		112			2,783			250			13,750

Net non-operating income (loss)		18,934			(52,956	)		27,280			(14,126	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		41,218			(37,319	)		82,751			(240,399	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		16,340			(14,168	)		32,409			(92,516	)

Income (loss) from continuing operations		24,878			(23,151	)		50,342			(147,883	)
Income from discontinued operations, net of related taxes		—			5,427			—			5,335

Net income (loss)	$	24,878		$	(17,724	)	$	50,342		$	(142,548	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Chaparral Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries

Consolidated statements of cash flows


	Six months ended June 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2010 (unaudited)			2009 (unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income (loss)	$	50,342		$	(142,548	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation, depletion & amortization		49,588			55,899
Loss on impairment of oil and natural gas properties		—			240,790
Litigation settlement		—			2,928
Deferred income taxes		32,414			(89,178	)
Unrealized (gain) loss on ineffective portion of hedges and reclassification adjustments		7,687			(18,759	)
Non-hedge derivative gains		(70,917	)		(17,308	)
Gain on sale of ESP Division of GCS and other assets		(74	)		(9,005	)
Other		749			1,359
Change in assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable		3,945			26,105
Inventories		(375	)		3,310
Prepaid expenses and other assets		7,169			9,946
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(1,625	)		(6,466	)
Revenue distribution payable		(2,034	)		(2,436	)
Deferred compensation		(490	)		(149	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		76,379			54,488
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of property and equipment and oil and natural gas properties		(123,695	)		(99,605	)
Proceeds from dispositions of property and equipment and oil and natural gas properties		336			437
Proceeds from sale of a business		—			24,650
Return of prepaid production tax asset		—			13,544
Settlement of non-hedge derivative instruments		25,757			132,466
Other		16			389

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(97,586	)		71,881
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from long-term debt		172,886			—
Repayment of long-term debt		(509,359	)		(91,922	)
Proceeds from equity issuance		313,231			—
Principal payments under capital lease obligations		(129	)		(126	)
Fees paid related to financing activities		(12,840	)		(2,157	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(36,211	)		(94,205	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(57,418	)		32,164
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		73,417			52,112

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	15,999		$	84,276

Supplemental cash flow information
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest, net of capitalized interest	$	37,436		$	44,276
Income taxes		(5	)		—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Chaparral Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries

Consolidated statements of cash flows—(Continued)

Supplemental disclosure of investing and financing activities

During the six months ended June 30, 2010, oil and natural gas property additions of $3,196 were recorded as increases to accounts payable and accrued expenses, and will be reflected in cash used in investing activities in the periods that the payables are settled. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, oil and natural gas property additions of $35,089 previously included in accounts payable and accrued expenses were settled and are reflected in cash used in investing activities.

During the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we recorded an asset and related liability of $191 and $300, respectively, associated with the asset retirement obligation on the acquisition and/or development of oil and natural gas properties.

Interest of $757 and $410 was capitalized during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, primarily related to unproved oil and natural gas leaseholds.

Chaparral Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries

Notes to consolidated financial statements

(dollars in thousands, unless otherwise noted)

Note 1: Nature of operations and summary of significant accounting policies

Chaparral Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries, (collectively, “we”, “our”, “us”, or the “Company”) is involved in the acquisition, exploration, development, production and operation of oil and natural gas properties. Properties are located primarily in Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico, Louisiana, Arkansas, Montana, Kansas, and Wyoming.

Interim financial statements

The accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X and do not include all of the financial information and disclosures required by GAAP. The financial information as of June 30, 2010, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, is unaudited. In the opinion of management, such information contains all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim periods. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that will be realized for the year ended December 31, 2010.

The consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, together with management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations contained in our Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 14, 2010.

Principles of consolidation

The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Chaparral Energy, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to current year presentation.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Significant estimates affecting these financial statements include estimates for quantities of proved oil and natural gas reserves, deferred income taxes, asset retirement obligations, fair value of derivative instruments, and others, and are subject to change.

Cash and cash equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. We maintain cash and cash equivalents in bank deposit accounts and money market funds which may not be federally insured. As of June 30, 2010, cash and funds held in escrow with a recorded balance totaling $12,622 was held at JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. We have not experienced any losses in such accounts and believe we are not exposed to any significant credit risk on such accounts.

Accounts receivable

Accounts receivable consisted of the following at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:


	June 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
Joint interests	$	13,145		$	11,986
Accrued oil and natural gas sales		31,566			33,600
Derivative settlements		6,195			5,977
Production tax benefit		—			19
Other		520			1,204
Allowance for doubtful accounts		(655	)		(817	)

	$	50,771		$	51,969

Inventories

Inventories are comprised of equipment used in developing oil and natural gas properties, oil and natural gas product inventories, and equipment for resale. Equipment inventory and inventory for resale are carried at the lower of cost or market using the average cost method. Oil and natural gas product inventories are stated at the lower of production cost or market. We regularly review inventory quantities on hand and record provisions for excess or obsolete inventory, if necessary. Inventories at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of the following:


	June 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
Equipment inventory	$	5,989		$	6,673
Oil and natural gas product		3,166			2,642
Inventory for resale		2,978			2,356
Inventory valuation allowance		(1,253	)		(1,120	)

	$	10,880		$	10,551

Oil and natural gas properties

We use the full cost method of accounting for oil and natural gas properties and activities. Accordingly, we capitalize all costs incurred in connection with the exploration for and development of oil and natural gas reserves. Proceeds from the disposition of oil and natural gas properties are accounted for as a reduction in capitalized costs, with no gain or loss generally recognized unless such dispositions involve a significant alteration in the depletion rate. We capitalize internal costs that can be directly identified with exploration and development activities, but do not include any costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities. Capitalized costs include geological and geophysical work, 3D seismic, delay rentals, drilling and completing and equipping oil and natural gas wells, including salaries, benefits and other internal costs directly attributable to these activities.

In accordance with the full cost method of accounting, the net capitalized costs of oil and natural gas properties are not to exceed their related estimated future net revenues discounted at 10% (“PV-10 value”), as adjusted for our cash flow hedge positions and net of tax considerations, plus the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproved properties. During the first quarter of 2009, natural gas prices declined significantly as compared to the December 31, 2008 spot price of $5.62 per Mcf. Based on March 31, 2009 spot prices of $49.66 per Bbl of oil and $3.63 per Mcf of natural gas, the internally estimated PV-10 value of our reserves declined by 13.5% compared to the PV-10 value at December 31, 2008. As a result, we recorded a ceiling test impairment of oil and natural gas properties of $240,790 during the first quarter of 2009. The effect of derivative contracts accounted for as cash flow hedges, based on the March 31, 2009 spot prices, increased the full cost ceiling by $169,013, thereby reducing the ceiling test write down by the same amount.

Our estimate of oil and natural gas reserves as of June 30, 2010 was prepared using an average price for oil and natural gas based upon the first day of each month for the prior twelve months as required by the SEC’s Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting and the updated guidance of the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) relating to Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation and Disclosures, which we adopted effective December 31, 2009. As of June 30, 2010, the cost center ceiling exceeded the net capitalized cost of our oil and natural gas properties and no additional ceiling test impairment was recorded. The PV-10 value of our reserves was estimated based on average prices of $75.76 per Bbl of oil and $4.10 per Mcf of gas for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010. A decline in oil and natural gas prices subsequent to June 30, 2010 could result in additional ceiling test write downs in future periods. The amount of any future impairment is difficult to predict, and will depend on the average oil and natural gas prices during each period, the incremental proved reserves added during each period, and additional capital spent.

Derivative transactions

We use derivative instruments to reduce the effect of fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas prices, and we recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities measured at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on the use of the derivative and the resulting designation.

Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are not accounted for as hedges are reported immediately in non-hedge derivative gains (losses) in the statement of operations. Cash flows associated with non-hedge derivatives are reported as investing activities in the statement of cash flows unless the derivatives contain a significant financing element, in which case they are reported as financing activities.

If the derivative qualifies and is designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) until the hedged item is recognized in income. The ineffective portion of a derivative’s change in fair value, as measured using the dollar offset method, is immediately recognized in loss from oil and natural gas hedging activities in the statement of operations. Cash flows associated with hedges are reported as operating activities in the statement of cash flows unless the hedges contain a significant financing element, in which case they are reported as financing activities.

If it is probable the oil or natural gas sales which are hedged will not occur, hedge accounting is discontinued and the gain or loss reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is immediately reclassified into income. If a derivative which qualified for cash flow hedge accounting ceases to be highly effective, or is liquidated or sold prior to maturity, hedge accounting is discontinued. The gain or loss associated with the discontinued hedges remains in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and is reclassified into income as the hedged transactions occur. Effective April 1, 2010, we have elected to de-designate all of our commodity derivative contracts that had previously been designated as cash flow hedges and to discontinue hedge accounting prospectively.

We offset assets and liabilities for derivative contracts executed with the same counterparty under a master netting arrangement. See Note 2 for additional information regarding our derivative transactions.

Fair value measurements

Fair value is defined by the FASB as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are applied. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the instruments or market and the instruments’ complexity.

Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the balance sheet are categorized according to the fair value hierarchy defined by the FASB. The hierarchical levels are based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure the fair value of the assets and liabilities. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the asset or liability is categorized based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and may affect the placement of assets and liabilities within the levels of the fair value hierarchy.

Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs include adjusted quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability. Fair value assets and liabilities included in this category are derivatives with fair values based on published forward commodity price curves and other observable inputs. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. Assets carried at fair value and included in this category are certain financial derivatives, additions to our asset retirement obligations, and assets acquired through a non-monetary exchange transaction.

In August 2009, the FASB issued new authoritative guidance regarding “Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value,” which is effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after issuance. The new guidance provides additional clarification regarding how fair value should be measured when a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available. We adopted the new guidance on October 1, 2009, and its adoption did not have an impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Impairment of long-lived assets

Impairment losses are recorded on property and equipment used in operations and other long lived assets when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amount. Impairment is measured based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the asset.

Asset retirement obligations

We record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred and a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of oil and natural gas properties. The accretion of the asset retirement obligations is included in depreciation, depletion and amortization on the consolidated statements of operations. Our asset retirement obligations consist of the estimated present value of future costs to plug and abandon or otherwise dispose of our oil and natural gas properties and related facilities. Significant inputs used in determining such obligations include estimates of plugging and abandonment costs, inflation rates, discount rates, and well life, all of which are Level 3 inputs according to the fair value hierarchy. The estimated future costs to dispose of properties added during the first six months of 2010 were escalated using an annual inflation rate of 2.95%, and discounted using our credit-adjusted risk-free interest rate of 8.8%.These estimates may change based upon future inflation rates and changes in statutory remediation rules. See Note 3 for additional information regarding our asset retirement obligations.

Stock-based compensation

Our stock-based compensation programs consist of phantom stock and restricted stock awards issued to employees. The estimated fair value of the phantom stock awards is remeasured at the end of each reporting period until settlement. The estimated fair market value of these awards is calculated based on our total asset value less total liabilities, with both assets and liabilities being adjusted to fair value, in accordance with the terms of the Phantom Stock Plan. The primary adjustment required is the adjustment of oil and natural gas properties from net book value to the discounted and risk adjusted reserve value based on internal reserve reports priced on NYMEX forward strips. Compensation cost associated with the phantom stock awards is recognized on a straight-line basis over the five-year vesting period.

We measure the fair value of our restricted stock awards that include a service condition based upon the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant, and recognize compensation cost over the requisite service period using the accelerated method for awards with graded vesting.

We use a Monte Carlo model to estimate the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that include a market condition. This model includes various significant assumptions, including the expected volatility of the share awards and the probabilities of certain vesting conditions. These assumptions reflect our best estimates, but they involve inherent uncertainties based on market conditions generally outside of our control. As a result, if other assumptions had been used, stock-based compensation expense could have been significantly impacted. Compensation cost associated with restricted stock awards that include a market condition is recognized over the requisite service period using the straight-line method.

Compensation cost is calculated net of forfeitures, which are estimated based on our historical and expected turnover rates. A portion of stock-based compensation cost associated with our employees involved in our acquisition, exploration, and development activities has been capitalized as part of our oil and natural gas properties. The remaining cost is reflected in lease operating and general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. If our actual forfeiture rate is materially different from our estimate, the stock-based compensation cost could be different from what we have recorded in the current period. We recognized stock-based compensation expense as follows for the periods indicated:


	Three months ending						Six months ending
	June 30, 2010			June 30, 2009			June 30, 2010			June 30, 2009
Stock-based compensation cost	$	1,059		$	706		$	1,312		$	940
Less: stock-based compensation cost capitalized		(358	)		(232	)		(445	)		(309	)

Stock-based compensation expense	$	701		$	474		$	867		$	631

Recognized tax benefit associated with stock-based compensation expense	$	278		$	180		$	340		$	243

Deferred income taxes

Deferred income taxes are provided for significant carryforwards and temporary differences between the tax basis of an asset or liability and its reported amount in the financial statements that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. Deferred income tax assets or liabilities are determined by applying the presently enacted tax rates and laws. We record a valuation allowance for the amount of net deferred tax assets when, in management’s opinion, it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized.

Realization of our deferred tax assets is dependent upon generating sufficient future taxable income. Although realization is not assured, we believe it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will be realized. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near-term if estimates of future taxable income are reduced.

If applicable, we would report a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, and would recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in interest expense. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we have not recorded a liability or accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions.

The tax years 1998 through 2009 remain open to examination for federal income tax purposes and by the other major taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject.

Sale of common stock

On April 12, 2010, we closed the sale of an aggregate of 475,043 shares of our common stock to CCMP Capital Investors II (AV-2), L.P., CCMP Energy I LTD., and CCMP Capital Investors (Cayman) II, L.P. (collectively, “CCMP”). Proceeds from the sale were $313,231, net of fees and other expenses of $11,769, and were used to repay the amounts owing under our Seventh Restated Credit Agreement.

Production tax credits

During 2006, we purchased interests in two venture capital limited liability companies resulting in a total investment of $15,000. Our return on the investment was the receipt of $2 of Oklahoma tax credits for every $1 invested and was recouped from our Oklahoma production taxes. The investments were accounted for as a production tax benefit asset and were netted against tax credits realized in other income using the effective yield method over the expected recovery period. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the carrying value of the production tax benefit asset was $0 and $19, respectively and was included in accounts receivable. Oklahoma production tax credits of $2,684 and $13,544, respectively, were included in other income in the consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. There was no income from these Oklahoma production tax credits during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.

Discontinued operations

Certain amounts have been reclassified to present the operations of the Electric Submersible Pumps (“ESP”) and Chemicals divisions of Green Country Supply, Inc. (“GCS”), a wholly owned subsidiary, as discontinued operations. Unless otherwise indicated, information presented in the notes to the financial statements relates only to our continuing operations. See Note 6 for additional information relating to discontinued operations.

Recently issued accounting standards

In January 2010, the FASB issued new authoritative guidance regarding “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” that requires additional disclosure of transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 measurements and the reasons for the transfers, and a gross presentation of activity within the Level 3 roll forward. The guidance also includes clarifications to existing disclosure requirements on the level of disaggregation and disclosures regarding inputs and valuation techniques. The guidance is effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the gross presentation of the Level 3 roll forward information, which is required for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim reporting periods within those years. We adopted the guidance on January 1, 2010, except for requirements regarding the gross presentation of Level 3 roll forward information, which we will adopt on January 1, 2011. Because this guidance only requires additional disclosures, it did not have an impact on our financial statements, nor is it expected to have an impact in future periods.

Note 2: Derivative activities and financial instruments

Derivative activities

Our results of operations, financial condition and capital resources are highly dependent upon the prevailing market prices of, and demand for, oil and natural gas. These commodity prices are subject to wide fluctuations and market uncertainties. To mitigate a portion of this exposure, we enter into commodity price swaps, costless collars, and basis protection swaps. See Note 1 for additional information regarding our accounting policies for derivatives and fair value measurements.

For commodity price swaps, we receive a fixed price for the hedged commodity and pay a floating market price to the counterparty. The fixed-price payment and the floating-price payment are netted, resulting in a net amount due to or from the counterparty. Collars contain a fixed floor price (put) and ceiling price (call). If the market price exceeds the call strike price or falls below the put strike price, we receive the fixed price and pay the market price. If the market price is between the call and the put strike price, no payments are due from either party.

We use basis protection swaps to reduce basis risk. Basis is the difference between the physical commodity being hedged and the price of the futures contract used for hedging. Basis risk is the risk that an adverse change in the futures market will not be completely offset by an equal and opposite change in the cash price of the commodity being hedged. Basis risk exists in natural gas primarily due to the geographic price differentials between cash market locations and futures contract delivery locations. Natural gas basis protection swaps are arrangements that guarantee a price differential for natural gas from a specified pricing point. We receive a payment from the counterparty if the price differential is greater than the stated terms of the contract and pay the counterparty if the price differential is less than the stated terms of the contract.

Our outstanding oil and natural gas derivative instruments as of June 30, 2010 are summarized below:


	Oil derivatives
	Swaps			Collars
	Volume MBbl	Weighted average fixed price to be received		Volume MBbl	Weighted average range
2010	1,285	$	74.45	120	$	110.00 - $168.55
2011	2,515		72.07	84		110.00 - 153.00

	3,800			204


	Natural gas derivatives						Natural gas basis protection swaps
	Swaps			Collars			Natural gas basis protection swaps
	Volume BBtu	Weighted average fixed price to be received		Volume BBtu	Weighted average range		Volume BBtu	Weighted average fixed price to be paid
2010	7,150	$	7.27	900	$	10.00 - $11.67	8,280	$	0.72
2011	12,150		7.24	—			15,390		0.67
2012	—			—			7,200		0.30

	19,300			900			30,870

Our derivative contracts have been executed with the institutions that are parties to our revolving credit facility, and we believe the credit risks associated with all of these institutions are acceptable. We did not post collateral under any of these contracts as they are secured under our revolving credit facility. Payment on our derivative contracts would be accelerated in the event of a default on our revolving credit facility. The aggregate fair value of our derivative liabilities was $40,814 at June 30, 2010.

Discontinuance of cash flow hedge accounting

Effective April 1, 2010, we elected to de-designate all of our commodity derivative contracts that had previously been designated as cash flow hedges and to discontinue hedge accounting prospectively. As a result, all gains and losses from changes in the fair value of our derivative contracts subsequent to March 31, 2010 are recognized immediately in non-hedge derivative gains (losses) in the consolidated statement of operations. Prior to March 31, 2010, a portion of the change in fair value was deferred through other comprehensive income. As of June 30, 2010, accumulated other comprehensive income consists of deferred net gains of $40,226 ($24,667 net of tax) that will be recognized as gains (losses) from oil and natural gas hedging activities through December 2013 as the hedged production is sold. We expect to reclassify $18,251 of net losses in accumulated other comprehensive income to income during the next 12 months.

Fair value of derivative instruments and derivative activities

The estimated fair values of derivative instruments are provided below. The carrying amounts of these instruments are equal to the estimated fair values.


	As of June 30, 2010								As of December 31, 2009
	Assets		Liabilities			Net value			Assets		Liabilities			Net value
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:
Oil swaps	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	172	$	(54,883	)	$	(54,711	)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Oil swaps		11,270		(32,852	)		(21,582	)		—		(13,840	)		(13,840	)
Natural gas swaps		40,006		—			40,006			30,366		(26	)		30,340
Oil collars		6,592		—			6,592			12,290		—			12,290
Natural gas collars		4,600		—			4,600			14,065		—			14,065
Natural gas basis differential swaps		494		(7,962	)		(7,468	)		—		(14,964	)		(14,964	)

Total non-hedge instruments		62,962		(40,814	)		22,148			56,721		(28,830	)		27,891

Total derivative instruments		62,962		(40,814	)		22,148			56,893		(83,713	)		(26,820	)
Less:
Netting adjustments (1)		35,876		(35,876	)		—			32,873		(32,873	)		—
Current portion asset (liability)		25,190		(2,604	)		22,586			18,226		(20,677	)		(2,451	)

	$	1,896	$	(2,334	)	$	(438	)	$	5,794	$	(30,163	)	$	(24,369	)

(1)	Amounts represent the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow us to net settle positive and negative positions with the same counterparties.

Gains and losses associated with cash flow hedges are summarized below.


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Amount of loss recognized in AOCI (effective portion)
Oil swaps	$	—		$	(57,944	)	$	(1,035	)	$	(59,444	)
Income taxes		—			22,402			400			22,993

	$	—		$	(35,542	)	$	(635	)	$	(36,451	)

Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI in income (effective portion)(1)
Oil swaps	$	(8,551	)	$	6,761		$	(13,395	)	$	19,072
Gas swaps		345			1,758			864			4,645
Income taxes		3,174			(3,190	)		4,847			(9,174	)

	$	(5,032	)	$	5,329		$	(7,684	)	$	14,543


Loss on oil swaps recognized in income (ineffective portion)(1)	$	—		$	(2,331	)	$	(660	)	$	(2,026	)

(1)	Included in gain (loss) from oil and natural gas hedging activities in the consolidated statements of operations.

During the second quarter of 2010, we early settled certain oil swaps and oil and natural gas collars with original settlement dates from April 2010 through December 2012 for net proceeds of $7,097. There were no early settlements during the first quarter of 2010. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, we received proceeds of $102,352 and $111,874, respectively, on the early settlement of certain oil and natural gas swaps and oil collars with original settlement dates from May through October of 2009 and January 2012 through December 2013.

Gain (loss) from oil and natural gas hedging activities, which is a component of total revenues in the consolidated statements of operations, is comprised of the following:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Oil hedges
Reclassification adjustment for hedge gains (losses) included in net income (loss)	$	(8,551	)	$	6,761		$	(13,395	)	$	19,072
Loss on ineffective portion of derivatives qualifying for hedge accounting		—			(2,331	)		(660	)		(2,026	)
Natural gas hedges
Reclassification adjustment for hedge gains included in net income (loss)		345			1,758			864			4,645

Total	$	(8,206	)	$	6,188		$	(13,191	)	$	21,691

Non-hedge derivative gains (losses) in the consolidated statements of operations are comprised of the following:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Change in fair value of commodity price swaps	$	29,063		$	(98,665	)	$	52,828		$	(68,753	)
Change in fair value of costless collars		(12,967	)		(39,331	)		(15,163	)		(36,169	)
Change in fair value of natural gas basis differential contracts		5,743			(5,910	)		7,495			(10,236	)
Receipts from (payments on) settlement of commodity price swaps		6,346			84,499			12,780			99,229
Receipts from (payments on) settlement of costless collars		13,725			27,267			19,466			32,345
Receipts from (payments on) settlement of natural gas basis differential contracts		(2,050	)		(879	)		(6,489	)		892

	$	39,860		$	(33,019	)	$	70,917		$	17,308

Derivative settlements receivable of $6,195 and $5,977 were included in accounts receivable at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Derivative settlements payable of $5 and $1,739 were included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

Fair value of derivative instruments

All derivative financial instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. We estimate the fair value of our derivative instruments using a combined income and market valuation methodology. Future cash flows from the derivatives are estimated based on the difference between the fixed contract price and the underlying published forward market price, and are discounted at the LIBOR swap rate. The fair value of collars is determined using an option pricing model which takes into account market volatility as well as the inputs described above. All derivative instruments are discounted further using a rate that incorporates our nonperformance risk for derivative liabilities, and our counterparties’ nonperformance risk for derivative assets. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the rate reflecting our nonperformance risk was 3.00% and 3.25%, respectively, and the weighted-average rate reflecting our counterparties’ nonperformance risk was approximately 1.78% and 1.49%, respectively.

We have no Level 1 assets or liabilities as of June 30, 2010. Our derivative contracts classified as Level 2 are valued using NYMEX forward commodity price curves and quotations provided by price index developers such as Platts. In certain less liquid markets, forward prices are not as readily available. In these circumstances, commodity swaps are valued using internally developed methodologies that consider historical relationships among various commodities that result in management’s best estimate of fair value. These contracts are classified as Level 3. Due to unavailability of observable volatility data input, the fair value measurement of all our collars has been categorized as Level 3.

The fair value hierarchy for our financial assets and liabilities is shown by the following table:


	As of June 30, 2010								As of December 31, 2009
	Derivative assets			Derivative liabilities			Net assets (liabilities)		Derivative assets			Derivative liabilities			Net assets (liabilities)
Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)	$	51,770		$	(40,814	)	$	10,956	$	30,538		$	(83,713	)	$	(53,175	)
Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)		11,192			—			11,192		26,355			—			26,355
Netting adjustments (1)		(35,876	)		35,876			—		(32,873	)		32,873			—

	$	27,086		$	(4,938	)	$	22,148	$	24,020		$	(50,840	)	$	(26,820	)

(1)	Amounts represent the impact of master netting agreements that allow us to net settle positive and negative positions with the same counterparty.

Changes in the fair value of net commodity derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy at June 30 were:


	For the six months ended June 30,
Net derivative assets	2010			2009
Beginning Balance	$	26,355		$	79,603
Realized and unrealized gains included in non-hedge derivative gains		4,303			(3,739	)
Settlements		(19,466	)		(32,635	)

Ending balance		11,192			43,229

Gains relating to assets still held at the reporting date included in non-hedge derivative gains for the period	$	1,928		$	1,632

Fair value of financial instruments

The carrying values of items comprising current assets and current liabilities approximate fair values due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. The carrying value for long-term debt at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 approximates fair value because substantially all debt carries variable market rates and incorporates a measure of our credit risk. The carrying value and estimated market value of our senior notes at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows:


	June 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
	Carrying value		Estimated fair value		Carrying value		Estimated fair value
8 ¹/2% Senior Notes due 2015	$	325,000	$	316,875	$	325,000	$	281,125
8 ⁷/8% Senior Notes due 2017		322,985		301,844		322,877		281,125

	$	647,985	$	618,719	$	647,877	$	562,250

Fair value amounts have been estimated based on quoted market prices. The use of different market assumptions or valuation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Note 3: Asset retirement obligations

The following table provides a summary of our asset retirement obligations for June 30, 2010.


	Six months ended June 30, 2010
Beginning balance	$	37,465
Liabilities incurred in current period		191
Liabilities settled in current period		(389	)
Accretion expense		1,594

	$	38,861
Less current portion		300

	$	38,561

See Note 1 for additional information regarding our accounting policies for asset retirement obligations and fair value measurements.

Note 4: Long-term debt

Long-term debt at June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, consisted of the following:


	June 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Revolving credit line with banks	$	172,000	$	507,001
Real estate mortgage notes, principal and interest payable monthly, bearing interest at rates ranging from 3.71% to 9.26%, due January 2017 through December 2028; collateralized by real property		13,248		13,465
Installment notes payable, principal and interest payable monthly, bearing interest at rates ranging from 2.00% to 9.25%, due July 2010 through January 2014; collateralized by automobiles, machinery and equipment		7,030		8,285

		192,278		528,751
Less current maturities		4,160		4,405

	$	188,118	$	524,346

As of December 31, 2009, we were party to a Seventh Restated Credit Agreement, which was scheduled to mature on October 31, 2010 and was collateralized by our oil and natural gas properties.

On April 12, 2010, in connection with our sale of common stock to CCMP, we entered into and closed an Eighth Restated Credit Agreement, which has an initial borrowing base of $450,000, is collateralized by our oil and natural gas properties, and is scheduled to mature on April 12, 2014. We used the proceeds from the sale of common stock to CCMP, along with proceeds available under the Eighth Restated Credit Agreement, to repay the amounts owing under our Seventh Restated Credit Agreement, and those amounts are classified as long-term debt as of December 31, 2009. During the second quarter of 2010, we recorded expenses for derivative novation and break fees and the write off of prepaid bank fees associated with our Seventh Restated Credit Agreement of $3,090, and we recorded deferred financing costs associated with the closing of our Eighth Restated Credit Agreement of $10,909.

The terms of the Eighth Restated Credit Agreement are described below. The terms of the Seventh Restated Credit Agreement were substantially similar to those contained in the Eighth Restated Credit Agreement. All discussions of interest rates and ratios as of dates prior to April 12, 2010 relate to the Seventh Restated Credit Agreement.

Availability under our Credit Agreement is subject to a borrowing base which is set by the banks semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year. In addition, the lenders may request a borrowing base redetermination once between each scheduled redetermination and in the event of early termination of our derivative contracts. If we issue Additional Permitted Debt, as defined in the Eighth Restated Credit Agreement, the borrowing base will be automatically reduced by an amount equal to 25% of the aggregate stated principal amount of the debt issued. As of August 10, 2010, we had $190,000 outstanding and $258,080 of availability under our Eighth Restated Credit Agreement.

Borrowings under our Credit Agreement are made, at our option, as either Eurodollar loans or Alternate Base Rate (“ABR”) loans.

Interest on Eurodollar loans is computed at the Adjusted LIBO Rate, defined as the rate applicable to dollar deposits in the London interbank market with a maturity comparable to the interest period (one, two, three or six months, selected by us) times a Statutory Reserve Rate multiplier, as defined in the Credit Agreement, plus a margin where the margin varies from 2.50% to 3.50% depending on the utilization percentage of the conforming borrowing base. From April 12, 2010 until October 12, 2010, the margin is fixed at 3.00%. Interest payments on Eurodollar borrowings are due the last day of the interest period, if shorter than three months or every three months.

Interest on ABR loans is computed as the greater of (1) the Prime Rate, as defined in the Credit Agreement, (2) the Federal Funds Effective Rate, as defined in the Credit Agreement, plus 1/2 of 1%, or (3) the Adjusted LIBO Rate, as defined in the Credit Agreement, plus 1%; plus a margin where the margin varies from 1.625% to 2.625%, depending on the utilization percentage of the borrowing base.

Commitment fees of 0.50% accrue on the unused portion of the borrowing base amount, depending on the utilization percentage, and are included as a component of interest expense. We have the right to make prepayments of the borrowings at any time without penalty or premium.

Interest was paid at least every three months during 2010 and 2009. The effective rate of interest on the entire outstanding balance was 4.727% and 6.081% as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, and was based upon LIBOR.

The Credit Agreement contains restrictive covenants that may limit our ability, among other things, to:

•

incur additional indebtedness;

•

create or incur additional liens on our oil and natural gas properties;

•

pay dividends in cash or other property, redeem our capital stock or prepay certain indebtedness;

•

make investments in or loans to others;

•

change our line of business;

•

enter into operating leases;

•

merge or consolidate with another person, or lease or sell all or substantially all of our assets;

•

sell, farm-out or otherwise transfer property containing proved reserves;

•

enter into transactions with affiliates;

•

issue preferred stock;

•

enter into negative pledge agreements or agreements restricting the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends;

•

enter into or terminate certain swap agreements;

•

amend our organizational documents; and

•

amend, modify or waive under our permitted bond documents (i) any covenants that would make the terms materially more onerous to us or (ii) certain other provisions.

The Credit Agreement also has certain negative and affirmative covenants that require, among other things, maintaining a Current Ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, of not less than 1.0 to 1.0. The Credit Agreement also requires us to maintain a Consolidated Total Debt to Consolidated EBITDAX ratio, as defined in the Eighth Restated Credit Agreement, of not greater than:

•

4.50 to 1.0 for the annualized periods commencing on April 1, 2010 and ending on the last day of the fiscal quarter ending on June 30, 2010, September 30, 2010, and December 31, 2010;

•

4.25 to 1.0 for the four consecutive fiscal quarters ending on March 31, 2011, June 30, 2011, and September 30, 2011; and

•

4.00 to 1.0 for the four consecutive fiscal quarters ending on December 31, 2011 and for each period of four consecutive fiscal quarters ending on the last day of such applicable fiscal quarters thereafter.

The First Amendment to the Eighth Restated Credit Agreement, dated July 26, 2010, modified the definition of Consolidated EBITDAX to (1) permit cash proceeds received from the monetization of derivatives to be included in the calculation of Consolidated EBITDAX, to the extent that such monetizations, in any period between scheduled redeterminations, do not exceed 5% of the borrowing base then in effect, and (2) permit the exclusion from the calculation of Consolidated EBITDAX of up to $4,500 in one-time cash expenses associated with our financing transactions that were incurred and paid during the second quarter of 2010.

We believe we were in compliance with all covenants under the Credit Agreement as of June 30, 2010.

The Credit Agreement also specifies events of default, including non-payment, breach of warranty, non-performance of financial covenants, default on other indebtedness, certain adverse judgments, and change of control, among others. In addition, bankruptcy and insolvency events with respect to us or certain of our subsidiaries will result in an automatic acceleration of the indebtedness under the Credit Agreement. An acceleration of our indebtedness under the Credit Agreement could in turn result in an event of default under the indentures for our Senior Notes, which in turn could result in the acceleration of the Senior Notes.

If the outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement were to exceed the borrowing base as a result of a redetermination, we would be required to eliminate this excess. Within 10 days after receiving notice of the new borrowing base, we would be required to make an election: (1) to repay a portion of our bank borrowings in the amount of the excess either in a lump sum within 30 days or in equal monthly installments over a six-month period, (2) to submit within 30 days additional oil and natural gas properties we own for consideration in connection with the determination of the borrowing base sufficient to eliminate the excess or (3) to eliminate the excess through a combination of repayments and the submission of additional oil and natural gas properties within 30 days.

Note 5: Related party transactions

CHK Holdings L.L.C. (“CHK”) an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Chesapeake Energy Corporation (“Chesapeake”), owns 20% of our outstanding common stock. We participate in ownership of properties operated by Chesapeake, and we received revenues and incurred joint interest billings on these properties as follows:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Revenues	$	1,578		$	972		$	2,929		$	2,636
Joint interest billings		(1,783	)		(750	)		(4,373	)		(2,136	)

	$	(205	)	$	222		$	(1,444	)	$	500

In addition, Chesapeake participates in ownership of properties operated by us, and we paid revenues and recorded joint interest billings to Chesapeake on these properties as follows:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Revenues	$	(489	)	$	(236	)	$	(893	)	$	(620	)
Joint interest billings		273			642			457			1,830

	$	(216	)	$	406		$	(436	)	$	1,210

Amounts receivable from and payable to Chesapeake were $1,965 and $804, respectively, as of June 30, 2010. Amounts receivable from and payable to Chesapeake were $2,506 and $241, respectively, as of December 31, 2009.

Note 6: Discontinued operations

Discontinued operations consist of the third-party revenues and operating expenses of the ESP and Chemicals divisions of GCS. Revenues were generated through the sale of oilfield supplies, chemicals, downhole submersible pumps, and related services to oil and natural gas operators primarily in Oklahoma, Texas, and Wyoming. Operating expenses consisted of costs of sales related to product sales and general and administrative expenses.

In the second quarter of 2009, we committed to a plan to sell the assets of these divisions, and on June 8, 2009, we sold the assets of the ESP division to Global Oilfield Services, Inc. (“Global”) for a cash price of approximately $24,650 after working capital adjustments. We paid off notes payable attributed to certain assets sold to Global in the amount of $1,605.

There was no activity associated with these divisions during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. The operating results of these divisions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 have been reclassified as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations as detailed in the table below.


(dollars in thousands)	Three months ended June 30, 2009			Six months ended June 30, 2009
Revenues	$	2,774		$	7,026
Operating expenses		(2,777	)		(6,954	)
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization		(178	)		(403	)
Gain on sale		9,004			9,004

Income before income taxes		8,823			8,673
Income tax expense		3,396			3,338

Income from discontinued operations	$	5,427		$	5,335

There were no assets held for sale or liabilities associated with discontinued operations as of June 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009.

Note 7: Commitments and contingencies

Standby letters of credit (“Letters”) available under our revolving credit line are used in lieu of surety bonds with various organizations for liabilities relating to the operation of oil and natural gas properties. We had various Letters outstanding totaling $1,920 and $2,855 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Interest on each Letter accrues at the lender’s prime rate (effective rate of 4.727% at June 30, 2010 and 6.081% at December 31, 2009) for all amounts paid by the lenders under the Letters. We paid no interest on the Letters during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.

Various claims and lawsuits, incidental to the ordinary course of business, are pending both for and against us. In the opinion of management, all matters are not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Effective April 15, 2009, we settled a lawsuit against John Milton Graves Trust u/t/a 6/11/2004, et al. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, the Sellers paid us $7,100 and we retained $387 contained in an escrow account, which amounts settled all claims related to the litigation. In addition, the parties issued mutual releases, dismissed with prejudice the pending litigation and the claims made therein, and the Sellers agreed to take action to clear the title to certain properties purchased by us in the Calumet acquisition.

As a result of the settlement, as of June 30, 2009, a $14,406 receivable and a $4,378 payable related to the litigation were eliminated, the escrow cash account was reclassified to operating cash, and we recorded a charge to expense of $2,928.

Note 8: Common stock

Stock Purchase Agreements

On March 23, 2010, we entered into a stock purchase agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) with CCMP, pursuant to which CCMP would purchase and we would sell 475,042 shares of our class E common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and one share of class F common stock, par value $0.01 per share, for a purchase price of $325,000. Fees and other expenses of the transaction were approximately $11,769. The closing date of the Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Closing Date”) was April 12, 2010.

In connection with the execution of the Stock Purchase Agreement, on April 12, 2010, two of the three principal stockholders of the Company, Fischer Investments, L.L.C. (“Fischer”) and Altoma Energy GP (“Altoma”), each executed a stock purchase agreement with CCMP pursuant to which CCMP purchased from such stockholder 14,617 shares of Company common stock for a purchase price of $10,000.

As a result of the closing of the Stock Purchase Agreement and the stock purchase agreements discussed above, CCMP owns approximately 36% of our total outstanding common stock as of August 10, 2010.

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended Bylaws

In connection with the execution of the Stock Purchase Agreement, we filed the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Delaware Secretary of State on April 12, 2010. The Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation creates seven classes of $0.01 par value per share common stock, classes A through G, with the rights and preferences summarized below. The class A common stock carries standard voting, dividend and liquidation rights. The class B, C and D common stock was issued to our existing stockholders, with a separate class issued to each stockholder. The class E and class F common stock was issued to CCMP. One share of class G common stock was issued to each of our existing stockholders. All shares of class B through G common stock will automatically convert to class A common stock upon consummation of an initial public offering of shares of class A common stock resulting in proceeds to us of at least $250,000, which is underwritten on a firm commitment basis by a nationally recognized investment banking firm, and which results in the initial listing or quotation of the class A common stock on any national securities exchange (a “Qualified IPO”).

Holders of class B, C and D common stock have the right, in aggregate, to designate three of our five directors. Holders of class E common stock have the right to designate the remaining two directors. Holders of each of the class B, C, D, and E common stock have designated their respective directors. All of the initial designees of the class B, C, D and E common stock were approved by the existing board of directors prior to being empanelled.

The class B, E, F and G common stock carry the following additional voting and consent rights:

•

So long as the class B holders own 80% or more of the common stock they owned as of the Closing Date, and without such holder’s prior consent, we may neither initiate nor consummate a sale of the Company, whether in the form of a stock sale, asset sale, merger or any other form whatsoever (a “Company Sale”), or a liquidation or dissolution of the Company, on or prior to the sixth anniversary of the Closing Date.

•

In certain circumstances, we are prohibited from incurring debt, consummating sales or acquisitions of assets, taking certain operational actions or engaging in other specified transactions without the prior consent of the holders of the class E common stock.

•

Upon the triggering of a Company Sale or a Demand IPO (each as summarized below) by holders of class E common stock, the voting and other rights related to the class F common stock will permit holders of class E common stock to cause any actions necessary to be taken by our board of directors or stockholders to consummate such Company Sale or Demand IPO.

•

Upon the triggering of a Demand IPO by a majority in interest of our existing stockholders, the voting and other rights related to the class G common stock will permit the majority of the holders of class G common stock to cause any actions necessary to be taken by the Company’s board of directors or stockholders to consummate such Demand IPO.

The rights and preferences of a holder of class B, C, D, E, F and G common stock terminate on the earlier of (x) the closing date of a Qualified IPO or (y) the date that such holder and its permitted transferees cease to beneficially own 5% or more of our fully-diluted common stock.

Our bylaws have been amended to conform to the provisions of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.

Stockholders Agreement

In connection with the closing of the Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company, CCMP and our existing stockholders executed the Stockholders Agreement on April 12, 2010. The Stockholders Agreement provides for certain general rights and restrictions, including board observer rights, informational rights, general restrictions on transfer of common stock, tag-along rights, preemptive rights, registration rights following a Qualified IPO and, subject to certain limited exceptions, prohibitions on the sale or acquisition of our common stock that would result in a change of control, as such term is defined under the indentures for our 8¹/2% senior notes due 2015 and our 8⁷/8% senior notes due 2017.

The Stockholders Agreement also provides for the following stockholder-specific rights or restrictions:

•

Prior to a Qualified IPO, Altoma will not vote for the approval of (i) any merger, consolidation, conversion or a Demand IPO, (ii) certain amendments to our organizational documents, (iii) the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or (iv) a termination of the business of or liquidation or dissolution of the Company, unless Fischer votes for such approval.

•

Other than pursuant to the exercise of preemptive rights, CHK may not acquire more than 25% of our outstanding common stock.

•

CCMP may sell up to 20% of its common stock owned on the Closing Date without restriction. Prior to a Qualified IPO and except in limited circumstances, CCMP is restricted from making further sales before the fourth anniversary of the Closing Date, and any sales thereafter (but before a Qualified IPO) will be subject to certain rights of first offer provisions set forth in the Stockholders Agreement (the “ROFO provisions”).

•

Fischer may sell up to 20% of its common stock owned immediately prior to the Closing Date subject to certain restrictions. Prior to a Qualified IPO and except in limited circumstances, Fischer is restricted from making further sales before the fourth anniversary of the Closing Date, and any sales thereafter (but before a Qualified IPO) will be subject to the ROFO provisions.

•

Prior to a Qualified IPO and except in limited circumstances, CHK is restricted from selling its common stock before the 30 month anniversary of the Closing Date, and any sales thereafter (but before a Qualified IPO) will be subject to the ROFO provisions.

•

If our common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange after August 15, 2011, Altoma may request to transfer its shares pursuant to a demand registration, but only after Altoma first offers such shares to the Company, and then to CHK, Fischer and CCMP in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Stockholders Agreement.

•

At any time after the 18 month anniversary of the Closing Date, either (i) CCMP or (ii ) a majority in interest of our existing stockholders may demand that we engage in a Qualified IPO (a “Demand IPO”), if (a) the price per share to be received by the Company or such party or parties, as the case may be, in such Demand IPO is at least 1.75 times the price per share paid by CCMP for our common stock pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement and (b) certain other conditions are met.

•

At any time after the four year anniversary of the Closing Date, CCMP may demand a Demand IPO.

•

At any time after the sixth anniversary of the Closing Date, and so long as a Qualified IPO has not yet occurred, CCMP may demand a Company Sale, subject to a right of first offer to purchase the Company provided to Fischer.

With the exception of registration rights, the rights and preferences of a stockholder under the Stockholders Agreement will generally terminate on the earlier of (x) the closing date of a Qualified IPO or (y) the date that such holder and its permitted transferees cease to beneficially own 5% or more of our fully-diluted common stock.

Summary of changes in common stock

The following is a summary of the changes in our common shares outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2010:


	Common Stock
	Class A	Class B	Class C	Class D	Class E	Class F	Class G	Shares Outstanding on April 11, 2010		Total
Shares issued at January 1, 2010	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	877,000		877,000
Change in classification	—	357,882	209,882	279,999	29,234	—	3	(877,000	)	—
Common stock issuance for cash	—	—	—	—	475,042	1	—	—		475,043
Restricted stock issuances	49,333	—	—	—	—	—	—	—		49,333

Shares issued at June 30, 2010	49,333	357,882	209,882	279,999	504,276	1	3	—		1,401,376

Note 9: Stock-based compensation

Phantom Stock Plan

Effective January 1, 2004, we implemented a Phantom Unit Plan, which was revised on December 31, 2008 as the Second Amended and Restated Phantom Stock Plan (the “Plan”), to provide deferred compensation to certain key employees (the “Participants”). Phantom stock may be awarded to participants in total up to 2% of the fair market value of the Company. No participant may be granted, in the aggregate, more than 5% of the maximum number of phantom shares available for award. Under the current plan, awards vest on the fifth anniversary of the award date, but may also vest on a pro-rata basis following a participant’s termination of employment with us due to death, disability, retirement or termination by us without cause. Also, phantom stock will vest if a change of control event occurs. Upon vesting, participants are entitled to redeem their phantom stock for cash within 120 days of the vesting date.

As a result of the sale of common stock to CCMP, we issued a total of 28,392 incremental phantom shares to all participants in the Plan as of April 12, 2010 in accordance with the anti-dilution provisions of the Plan. These shares have a weighted-average vesting period of 2.4 years. There was no incremental fair value associated with this modification of the initial awards, and no additional compensation cost was recognized.

A summary of our phantom stock activity during the first six months of 2010 is presented in the following table:


	Weighted average grant date fair value		Phantom shares		Vest date fair value
	($ per share)
Unvested and outstanding at January 1, 2010	$	12.77	175,482
Granted	$	20.73	43,268
Vested	$	8.79	(55,313	)	$	1,354
Forfeited	$	13.30	(2,559	)

Unvested and total outstanding at June 30, 2010	$	16.27	160,878

Payments for phantom shares were $1,357 and $779, respectively, during the second quarters of 2010 and 2009, and were $1,357 and $780, respectively, during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. As of June 30, 2010, there were no vested units outstanding. Based on an estimated fair value of $17.03 per phantom share as of June 30, 2010, the aggregate intrinsic value of the unvested phantom shares outstanding was $2,740, which includes approximately $1,421 of unrecognized compensation cost that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.47 years. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, accrued payroll and benefits payable included $372 and $1,315, respectively, for deferred compensation costs vesting within the next twelve months.

2010 Equity Incentive Plan

We adopted the Chaparral Energy, Inc. 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”) on April 12, 2010. The 2010 Plan reserves a total of 86,301 shares of our class A common stock for awards issued under the 2010 Plan. All of our or our affiliates’ employees, officers, directors, and consultants are eligible to participate in the 2010 Plan.

On April 12, 2010, our Board of Directors approved initial awards of restricted stock under the 2010 Plan totaling 49,333 shares of our class A common stock. These initial awards consisted of a total of 9,463 shares that are subject to service vesting conditions (also defined as “Time Vesting” awards in the restricted stock agreements) and a total of 39,870 shares that are subject to market and performance vesting conditions (also defined as “Performance Vesting” awards in the restricted stock agreements).

The service condition awards vest in equal annual installments over the five year vesting period. In the event of a transaction whereby CCMP receives cash upon the sale of its Class E common stock (a “Transaction” as defined in the restricted stock agreements), vesting of the service condition shares will be accelerated with respect to the fraction obtained by dividing (x) the number of shares of common stock sold pursuant to the Transaction, by (y) the 504,276 shares of class E common stock owned by CCMP on April 12, 2010 (the “Vesting Fraction”). All other shares will remain subject to the normal vesting schedule. Since we believe the occurrence of a Transaction is probable, compensation cost is recognized over the 3.7 year derived service period associated with the accelerated vesting provision.

The market condition awards vest in the event of a Transaction, as defined in the restricted stock agreements, whereby CCMP’s net proceeds from the Transaction yield certain target returns on investment, as shown in the following table:


Return on Investment Target		Shares Vested
200% per share		20% of shares multiplied by the Vesting Fraction
250% per share		40% of shares multiplied by the Vesting Fraction
300% per share		60% of shares multiplied by the Vesting Fraction
350% per share		80% of shares multiplied by the Vesting Fraction
400% per share		100% of shares multiplied by the Vesting Fraction

The price paid by CCMP for our Class E common stock on April 12, 2010, which was also the grant date, was considered to be the fair value of the service condition awards. The Monte Carlo simulation method was used to value the market condition awards. A Monte Carlo simulation allows for the analysis of a complex security through statistical measures applied to a model that is simulated thousands of times to build distributions of potential outcomes. The variables and assumptions used in this calculation were as follows:


	April 12, 2010
Risk free interest rate		0.44% to 3.65	%
Expected volatility		0.55
Expected dividends	$	0.00
Expected life		8 years

Expected volatility is calculated based on the average historical stock price volatility of our peer group, which consisted of the following oil and gas exploration and production companies: Berry Petroleum Co., Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation, Concho Resources, Inc., Comstock Resources, Inc., Continental Resources, Inc., Denbury Resources, Inc., Encore Energy Partners, LP, EXCO Resources, Inc., and Whiting Petroleum Corp. Since we believe the occurrence of a Transaction is probable, compensation cost is recognized over the 5.5 year derived service period.

A summary of our restricted stock activity during the first six months of 2010 is presented in the following table:


	Weighted average grant date fair value		Restricted shares
	($ per share)
Unvested and outstanding at January 1, 2010	$	—	—
Granted	$	369.73	49,333
Vested	$	—	—
Forfeited	$	—	—

Unvested and total outstanding at June 30, 2010	$	369.73	49,333

Unrecognized compensation cost of $16,543 associated with our non-vested restricted stock awards is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 4.94 years.

Note 10: Comprehensive income (loss)

Components of comprehensive income (loss), net of related tax, are as follows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:


	Three months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,
	2010		2009			2010			2009
Net income (loss)	$	24,878	$	(17,724	)	$	50,342		$	(142,548	)
Unrealized loss on hedges		—		(35,542	)		(635	)		(36,451	)
Reclassification adjustment for hedge (gains) losses included in net income (loss)		5,032		(5,329	)		7,684			(14,543	)

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	29,910	$	(58,595	)	$	57,391		$	(193,542	)

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion is intended to assist you in understanding our business and results of operations together with our present financial condition. This section should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this report.

Statements in our discussion may be forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. We caution that a number of factors could cause future production, revenues and expenses to differ materially from our expectations

Overview

We are an independent oil and natural gas company engaged in the production, acquisition and exploitation of oil and natural gas properties. Our areas of operation include the Mid-Continent, Permian Basin, Gulf Coast, Ark-La-Tex, North Texas and the Rocky Mountains. We maintain a portfolio of proved and unproved reserves, development and exploratory drilling opportunities, and EOR projects.

Our revenues, profitability and future growth depend substantially on prevailing prices for oil and natural gas and on our ability to find, develop and acquire oil and natural gas reserves that are economically recoverable. The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect our reported results of operations and the amount of our reported assets, liabilities and proved oil and natural gas reserves. We use the full cost method of accounting for our oil and natural gas activities.

Generally our producing properties have declining production rates. Our reserve estimates as of December 31, 2009 reflect that our production rate on current proved developed producing reserve properties will decline at annual rates of approximately 14%, 11% and 9% for the next three years. To grow our production and cash flow we must find, develop and acquire new oil and natural gas reserves to replace those being depleted by production. Substantial capital expenditures are required to find, develop and acquire oil and natural gas reserves.

Oil and natural gas prices fluctuate widely. We generally hedge a substantial portion of our expected future oil and natural gas production to reduce our exposure to commodity price decreases. The prices we receive for our oil and natural gas production affect our:

•

cash flow available for capital expenditures;

•

ability to borrow and raise additional capital;

•

ability to service debt;

•

quantity of oil and natural gas we can produce;

•

quantity of oil and natural gas reserves; and

•

operating results for oil and natural gas activities.

During the second quarter of 2010, quarterly production was 2,049 MBoe, a 5% increase from production levels in the second quarter of 2009, primarily due to our drilling activity in the Mid-Continent area. This increase in production, combined with a 33% increase in our average sales price before hedging, resulted in a 40% increase in revenue from oil and natural gas sales in the second quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. In addition, due primarily to changes in the NYMEX forward commodity price curves, we had a gain on non-hedge derivatives of $39.9 million in the second quarter of 2010 compared to a loss on non-hedge derivatives of $33.0 million during the second quarter of 2009. As a result of these and other factors, we reported net income of $24.9 million during the second quarter of 2010 compared to a net loss of $17.7 million for the comparable period in 2009.

The following are material events that have impacted our liquidity or results of operations, and/or are expected to impact these items future periods:

•

Stock purchase agreement. On April 12, 2010, we closed the sale of an aggregate of 475,043 shares of our common stock to CCMP Capital Investors II (AV-2), L.P., CCMP Energy I LTD., and CCMP Capital Investors (Cayman) II, L.P. (collectively, “CCMP”). Proceeds from the sale were $313.2 million, net of fees and other expenses of $11.8 million, and were used to repay the amounts owing under our Seventh Restated Credit Agreement. See Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding this transaction.

•

Eighth Restated Credit Agreement. In connection with the closing of the sale of our common stock to CCMP, we entered into and closed an Eighth Restated Credit Agreement, which has an initial borrowing base of $450.0 million, is collateralized by our oil and natural gas properties, and is scheduled to mature on April 12, 2014. We used the proceeds from the sale of common stock to CCMP, along with proceeds available under the Eighth Restated Credit Agreement, to repay the amounts owing under our Seventh Restated Credit Agreement. During the second quarter of 2010, we recorded expenses for derivative novation and break fees and the write off of prepaid bank fees associated with our Seventh Restated Credit Agreement of $3.1 million, and we recorded deferred financing costs associated with the closing of our Eighth Restated Credit Agreement of $10.9 million.

•

2010 Equity Incentive Plan. We adopted the Chaparral Energy, Inc. 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”) on April 12, 2010. The 2010 Plan reserves a total of 86,301 shares of our class A common stock for awards issued under the 2010 Plan. All of our or our affiliates’ employees, officers, directors, and consultants are eligible to participate in the 2010 Plan. On April 12, 2010, our Board of Directors approved initial awards of restricted stock under the 2010 Plan totaling 49,333 shares of our class A common stock. These initial awards are subject to performance, service, and market vesting conditions. During the second quarter of 2010, we recorded stock-based compensation expense of $0.7 million associated with these awards. See Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding stock-based compensation.

•

Capital expenditure budget. We have expanded our oil and gas property capital expenditure budget for 2010 from $268.0 million to $310.0 million in order to accelerate our development program. The expanded 2010 capital budget represents an increase in capital expenditures of approximately 105% above our 2009 levels.

Liquidity and capital resources

We pledge our producing oil and natural gas properties to secure our Credit Agreement. The banks establish a borrowing base by making an estimate of the collateral value of our oil and natural gas properties. We utilize the available funds as needed to supplement our operating cash flows as a financing source for our capital expenditures. Our ability to fund our capital expenditures is dependent on the level of product prices and the success of our acquisition and development program in adding to our available borrowing base. If oil and natural gas prices decrease from the amounts used in estimating the collateral value of our oil and natural gas properties, the borrowing base may be reduced, thus reducing funds available for our capital expenditures. We mitigate a potential reduction in our borrowing base caused by a decrease in oil and natural gas prices through the use of commodity derivatives.

Historically, our primary sources of liquidity have been cash generated from our operations and debt. On April 12, 2010, we sold an aggregate of 475,043 shares of our common stock to CCMP for proceeds of $313.2 million, net of fees and other expenses of $11.8 million. In connection with our sale of common stock to CCMP, we entered into and closed an Eighth Restated Credit Agreement, which has an initial borrowing base of $450.0 million, is collateralized by our oil and natural gas properties, and is scheduled to mature on April 12, 2014. We used the proceeds from the sale of common stock to CCMP, along with proceeds available under the Eighth Restated Credit Agreement, to repay the amounts owing under our Seventh Restated Credit Agreement. As of August 10, 2010, we had $190.0 million outstanding and $258.1 million of availability under our Eighth Restated Credit Agreement.

Covenants set forth in the indentures for our 8¹/2% Senior Notes and the 8⁷/8% Senior Notes, including the ACNTA test, limit the amount of secured debt we can incur. Certain thresholds set forth in the ACNTA test are principally reliant upon the levels of commodity prices for crude oil and natural gas at specified dates.

As of June 30, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of $16.0 million and long-term debt obligations of $840.5 million.

Sources and uses of cash. The net increase (decrease) in cash is summarized as follows:


	Six months ended June 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2010			2009
Cash flows provided by operating activities	$	76,379		$	54,488
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities		(97,586	)		71,881
Cash flows used in financing activities		(36,211	)		(94,205	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash during the period	$	(57,418	)	$	32,164

Substantially all of our cash flow from operating activities is from the production and sale of oil and natural gas, reduced or increased by associated hedging activities. During the first half of 2009, operating cash flows also included production tax credits of $13.7 million. No such credits were received during the first half of 2010, and this source of cash will not be available in future periods. Despite the decrease in production tax credits received, cash flows from operating activities increased by 40% from 2009 to 2010, primarily due to the increase in revenue net of hedging activities.

We use the net cash provided by operations to partially fund our acquisition, exploration and development activities. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, cash flows provided by operating activities were approximately 62% and 55%, respectively, of cash used for the purchase of property and equipment and oil and natural gas properties.

Our capital expenditures for oil and gas properties are detailed below:


(dollars in thousands)	Actual capital expenditures six months ended June 30, 2010		Percent of total		2010 budgeted capital expenditures		Percent of total
Development activities:
Developmental drilling	$	65,094	53	%	$	176,000	57	%
Enhancements		14,346	12	%		27,000	9	%
Tertiary recovery		20,991	17	%		53,000	17	%
Acquisitions:
Proved properties		20,463	16	%		41,000	13	%
Unproved properties		2,711	2	%		5,000	2	%
Exploration activities		44	0	%		8,000	2	%

	$	123,649	100	%	$	310,000	100	%

In addition to the capital expenditures for oil and natural gas properties, we spent approximately $6.1 million for property and equipment during the first six months of 2010.

During the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the monetization of derivatives provided investing cash flows of $7.1 million and $111.9 million, respectively. Cash flows provided by investing activities for the first half of 2009 also included inflows of $13.5 million from our prepaid production tax asset and proceeds of $24.7 million from the sale of the Electric Submersible Pumps (“ESP”) division of Green Country Supply, Inc. (“GCS”), a wholly owned subsidiary. No such inflows were received during the first half of 2010. As a result, during the first half of 2010, cash flows used in investing activities were $97.6 million compared to cash flows provided by investing activities of $71.9 million during the first half of 2009.

Net cash used in financing activities was $36.2 million and $94.2 million during the first half of 2010 and 2009, respectively. On April 12, 2010, we sold an aggregate of 475,043 shares of our common stock to CCMP for proceeds of $313.2 million, net of fees and other expenses of $11.8 million, and we entered into and closed an Eighth Restated Credit Agreement. We used the proceeds from the sale of common stock to CCMP, along with proceeds available under the Eighth Restated Credit Agreement, to repay the amounts owing under our Seventh Restated Credit Agreement. As a result of our monetization of derivatives in the second quarter of 2009, the borrowing base under our Seventh Restated Credit Agreement was reduced from $600.0 million to $513.0 million, and proceeds from the monetization of $87.0 million were paid to the banks.

Credit Agreements

As of December 31, 2009, we were party to a Seventh Restated Credit Agreement, which was scheduled to mature on October 31, 2010, and was collateralized by our oil and natural gas properties.

On April 12, 2010, in connection with our sale of common stock to CCMP, we entered into and closed an Eighth Restated Credit Agreement, which has an initial borrowing base of $450.0 million, is collateralized by our oil and natural gas properties, and is scheduled to mature on April 12, 2014. We used the proceeds from the sale of common stock to CCMP, along with proceeds available under the Eighth Restated Credit Agreement, to repay the amounts owing under our Seventh Restated Credit Agreement. During the second quarter of 2010, we recorded expenses for derivative novation and break fees and the write off of prepaid bank fees associated with our Seventh Restated Credit Agreement of $3.1 million, and we recorded deferred financing costs associated with the closing of our Eighth Restated Credit Agreement of $10.9 million.

Availability under our Credit Agreement is subject to a borrowing base which is set by the banks semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year. In addition, the lenders may request a borrowing base redetermination once between each scheduled redetermination and in the event of early termination of our derivative contracts. If we issue Additional Permitted Debt, as defined in the Eighth Restated Credit Agreement, the borrowing base will be automatically reduced by an amount equal to 25% of the aggregate stated principal amount of the debt issued. As of August 10, 2010, we had $190.0 million outstanding and $258.1 million of availability under our Eighth Restated Credit Agreement.

Borrowings under our Credit Agreement are made, at our option, as either Eurodollar loans or Alternate Base Rate (“ABR”) loans.

Interest on ABR loans is computed as the greater of (1) the Prime Rate, as defined in our Credit Agreement, (2) the Federal Funds Effective Rate, as defined in the Credit Agreement, plus 1/2 of 1%, or (3) the Adjusted LIBO Rate, as defined in our Credit Agreement, plus 1%; plus a margin where the margin varies from 1.625% to 2.625%, depending on the utilization percentage of the borrowing base.

Our Credit Agreement has certain negative and affirmative covenants that require, among other things, maintaining a specified current ratio and debt service ratio. We believe we were in compliance with all covenants under our Credit Agreement as of June 30, 2010.

Our Credit Agreement contains restrictive covenants that may limit our ability, among other things, to:

•

incur additional indebtedness;

•

create or incur additional liens on our oil and natural gas properties;

•

pay dividends in cash or other property, redeem our capital stock or prepay certain indebtedness;

•

make investments in or loans to others;

•

change our line of business;

•

enter into operating leases;

•

merge or consolidate with another person, or lease or sell all or substantially all of our assets;

•

sell, farm-out or otherwise transfer property containing proved reserves;

•

enter into transactions with affiliates;

•

issue preferred stock;

•

enter into negative pledge agreements or agreements restricting the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends;

•

enter into or terminate certain swap agreements;

•

amend our organizational documents; and

•

amend, modify or waive under our permitted bond documents (i) any covenants that would make the terms materially more onerous to us or (ii) certain other provisions.

Our Credit Agreement requires us to maintain a current ratio, as defined in our Credit Agreement, of not less than 1.0 to 1.0. The definition of current assets and current liabilities used for determination of the current ratio computed for loan compliance purposes differs from current assets and current liabilities determined in compliance with GAAP. Since compliance with financial covenants is a material requirement under our Credit Agreement, we consider the current ratio calculated under our Credit Agreement to be a useful measure of our liquidity because it includes the funds available to us under our Credit Agreement and is not affected by the volatility in working capital caused by changes in the fair value of derivatives. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, our current ratio as computed using GAAP was 0.95 and 1.38, respectively. After giving effect to the adjustments, our current ratio computed for loan compliance purposes was 3.64 and 1.51, respectively. The following table reconciles our current assets and current liabilities using GAAP to the same items for purposes of calculating the current ratio for our loan compliance:


(dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
Current assets per GAAP	$	103,890		$	161,682
Plus—Availability under Credit Agreement		276,080			3,145
Less—Short-term derivative instruments		(25,190	)		(18,226	)
Less—Deferred tax asset on derivative instruments and asset retirement obligations		—			(1,079	)

Current assets as adjusted	$	354,780		$	145,522

Current liabilities per GAAP	$	109,368		$	117,529
Less—Short term derivative instruments		(2,604	)		(20,677	)
Less—Deferred tax liability on derivative instruments and asset retirement obligations		(9,120	)		—
Less—Short-term asset retirement obligation		(300	)		(300	)

Current liabilities as adjusted	$	97,344		$	96,552

Current ratio for loan compliance		3.64			1.51

The Eighth Restated Credit Agreement requires us to maintain a Consolidated Total Debt to Consolidated EBITDAX ratio, as defined in the Eighth Restated Credit Agreement, of not greater than:

•

4.50 to 1.0 for the annualized periods commencing on April 1, 2010 and ending on the last day of the fiscal quarter ending on June 30, 2010, September 30, 2010, and December 31, 2010;

•

4.25 to 1.0 for the four consecutive fiscal quarters ending on March 31, 2011, June 30, 2011, and September 30, 2011; and

•

The First Amendment to the Eighth Restated Credit Agreement, dated July 26, 2010, modified the definition of Consolidated EBITDAX to (1) permit cash proceeds received from the monetization of derivatives to be included in the calculation of Consolidated EBITDAX, to the extent that such monetizations, in any period between scheduled redeterminations, do not exceed 5% of the borrowing base then in effect, and (2) permit the exclusion from the calculation of Consolidated EBITDAX of up to $4.5 million in one-time cash expenses associated with our financing transactions that were incurred and paid during the second quarter of 2010.

The Credit Agreement also specifies events of default, including:

•

our failure to pay principal or interest under the Credit Agreement when due and payable;

•

our representations or warranties proving to be incorrect, in any material respect, when made or deemed made;

•

our failure to observe or perform certain covenants, conditions or agreements under the Credit Agreement;

•

our failure to make payments on certain other material indebtedness when due and payable;

•

the occurrence of any event or condition that requires the redemption or repayment of, or an offer to redeem or repay, certain other material indebtedness prior to its scheduled maturity;

•

the commencement of a voluntary or involuntary proceeding seeking liquidation, reorganization or other relief, or the appointment of a receiver, trustee, custodian or other similar official for us or our subsidiaries, and the proceeding or petition continues undismissed for 60 days or an order approving the foregoing is entered;

•

our inability, admission or failure generally to pay our debts as they become due;

•

the entry of a final, non-appealable judgment for the payment of money in excess of $5.0 million that remains undischarged for a period of 60 consecutive days;

•

a Change of Control (as defined in the Credit Agreement); and

•

the occurrence of a default under any permitted bond document, which such default continues unremedied or is not waived prior to the expiration of any applicable grace or cure under any permitted bond document.

If the outstanding borrowings under our Credit Agreement were to exceed the borrowing base as a result of a redetermination, we would be required to eliminate this excess. Within 10 days after receiving notice of the new borrowing base, we would be required to make an election: (1) to repay a portion of our bank borrowings in the amount of the excess either in a lump sum within 30 days or in equal monthly installments over a six-month period, (2) to submit within 30 days additional oil and natural gas properties we own for consideration in connection with the determination of the borrowing base sufficient to eliminate the excess or (3) to eliminate the excess through a combination of repayments and the submission of additional oil and natural gas properties within 30 days.

Alternative capital resources

We have historically used cash flow from operations, debt financing, and private issuances of common stock as our primary sources of capital. In the future we may use additional sources such as asset sales, additional public or private issuances of common or preferred stock, or project financing. While we believe we would be able to obtain funds through one or more of these alternative sources, if needed, we cannot provide assurance that these resources would be available on terms acceptable to us.

Results of operations

Revenues and production.

The following table presents information about our oil and natural gas sales before the effects of commodity derivative settlements:


	Three months ended June 30,				Percent		Six months ended June 30,				Percent
	2010		2009		increase		2010		2009		increase
Oil and natural gas sales (dollars in thousands)
Oil	$	71,373	$	50,783	40.5	%	$	142,813	$	85,896	66.3	%
Natural gas		25,412		18,281	39.0	%		54,347		37,035	46.7	%

Total	$	96,785	$	69,064	40.1	%	$	197,160	$	122,931	60.4	%

Production
Oil (MBbls)		979		941	4.0	%		1,953		1,904	2.6	%
Natural gas (MMcf)		6,420		6,050	6.1	%		11,784		11,687	0.8	%

MBoe		2,049		1,949	5.1	%		3,917		3,852	1.7	%
Average sales prices (excluding derivative settlements)
Oil per Bbl	$	72.90	$	53.97	35.1	%	$	73.12	$	45.11	62.1	%
Gas per Mcf	$	3.96	$	3.02	31.1	%	$	4.61	$	3.17	45.4	%

Boe	$	47.24	$	35.44	33.3	%	$	50.33	$	31.91	57.7	%

Oil and natural gas revenues increased $27.7 million, or 40%, during the second quarter of 2010 compared to the second quarter of 2009 due to a 33% increase in the average price per Boe combined with a 5% increase in sales volumes. Oil and natural gas revenues increased $74.2 million, or 60%, during the first half of 2010 compared to the first half of 2009 due to a 58% increase in the average price per Boe combined with a 2% increase in sales volumes.

The relative impact of changes in commodity prices and sales volumes on our oil and natural gas sales before the effects of hedging is shown in the following table:


	Three months ended June 30, 2010 vs. 2009				Six months ended June 30, 2010 vs. 2009
(dollars in thousands)	Sales increase		Percentage increase in sales		Sales increase		Percentage increase in sales
Change in oil sales due to:
Prices	$	18,539	36.5	%	$	54,706	63.7	%
Production		2,051	4.0	%		2,211	2.6	%

Total increase in oil sales	$	20,590	40.5	%	$	56,917	66.3	%

Change in natural gas sales due to:
Prices	$	6,013	32.9	%	$	17,005	45.9	%
Production		1,118	6.1	%		307	0.8	%

Total increase in natural gas sales	$	7,131	39.0	%	$	17,312	46.7	%

Production volumes by area were as follows (MBoe):


	Three months ended June 30,		Percentage		Six months ended June 30,		Percentage
	2010	2009	change		2010	2009	change
Mid-Continent	1,418	1,241	14.3	%	2,737	2,464	11.1	%
Permian	379	448	(15.4	)%	712	878	(18.9	)%
Gulf Coast	118	116	1.7	%	226	234	(3.4	)%
Ark-La-Tex	63	70	(10.0	)%	101	128	(21.1	)%
North Texas	41	41	0.0	%	80	83	(3.6	)%
Rocky Mountains	30	33	(9.1	)%	61	65	(6.2	)%

Totals	2,049	1,949	5.1	%	3,917	3,852	1.7	%

In 2009 and the first quarter of 2010, we focused our capital expenditures in the Mid-Continent and Permian areas, and as a result, production in our other areas has generally declined. Due to our expanded capital expenditures beginning in the second quarter of 2010, we expect production to increase in all our areas during the last half of 2010. However, we cannot accurately predict the timing or level of future production. The increase in production in the Mid-Continent area is primarily due to our participation in six Atoka Wash wells, which came online during the first quarter of 2010 and accounted for approximately 10% and 8%, respectively, of our production in the Mid-Continent area during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.

The decrease in production in the Permian area is primarily due to the Bowdle 47 No. 2, which began selling natural gas in late November 2008 and accounted for approximately 11% and 10%, respectively, of total production for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, production from this well declined by approximately 56% and 42%, respectively, compared to production levels in the comparable periods of 2009. We have drilled and completed an offset, the Bowdle 47 No. 4, which came online in late April of 2010 and accounted for approximately 18% of our production in the Permian area during the second quarter of 2010.

Derivative activities

Our results of operations, financial condition and capital resources are highly dependent upon the prevailing market prices of, and demand for, oil and natural gas. These commodity prices are subject to wide fluctuations and market uncertainties. To mitigate a portion of this exposure, we enter into commodity price swaps, costless collars, and basis protection swaps. Certain commodity price swaps qualified and were designated as cash flow hedges. All of our derivative instruments are considered to be economic hedges even though they are not designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes.

Our realized prices are impacted by realized gains and losses resulting from commodity derivatives contracts. The following table presents information about the effects of derivative settlements, excluding derivative monetizations, on realized prices:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Oil (per Bbl):
Before derivative settlement	$	72.90		$	53.97		$	73.12		$	45.11
After derivative settlement	$	71.50		$	53.77		$	69.89		$	48.76
Post-settlement to pre-settlement price		98.1	%		99.6	%		95.6	%		108.1	%
Natural gas (per Mcf):
Before derivative settlement	$	3.96		$	3.02		$	4.61		$	3.17
After derivative settlement	$	5.87		$	4.18		$	6.26		$	4.59
Post-settlement to pre-settlement price		148.2	%		138.4	%		135.8	%		144.8	%

The estimated fair values of our oil and natural gas derivative instruments are provided below. The associated carrying values of these instruments are equal to the estimated fair values.


(dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
Derivative assets (liabilities):
Oil swaps	$	(21,582	)	$	(68,551	)
Natural gas swaps		40,006			30,340
Oil collars		6,592			12,290
Natural gas collars		4,600			14,065
Natural gas basis differential swaps		(7,468	)		(14,964	)

Net derivative asset (liability)	$	22,148		$	(26,820	)

Effective April 1, 2010, we elected to de-designate all of our commodity derivative contracts that had previously been designated as cash flow hedges and to discontinue hedge accounting prospectively. As a result, all gains and losses from changes in the fair value of our derivative contracts subsequent to March 31, 2010 are recognized immediately in non-hedge derivative gains (losses) in the consolidated statement of operations. Prior to March 31, 2010, a portion of the change in fair value has been deferred through other comprehensive income. As of June 30, 2010, accumulated other comprehensive income consists of deferred net gains of $40.2 million ($24.7 million net of tax) that will be recognized as gains (losses) from oil and natural gas hedging activities through December 2013 as the hedged production is sold.

The effects of derivative activities on our results of operations and cash flows for the second quarters of 2010 and 2009 were as follows:


	Three months ended June 30,
	2010						2009
(dollars in thousands)	Non-cash fair value adjustment			Cash receipts (payments)			Non-cash fair value adjustment			Cash receipts (payments)
Gain (loss) from oil and natural gas hedging activities:
Oil swaps	$	(8,551	)	$	—		$	6,129		$	(1,699	)
Natural gas swaps		345			—			1,758			—

Gain (loss) from oil and natural gas hedging activities:	$	(8,206	)	$	—		$	7,887		$	(1,699	)

Non-hedge derivative gains (losses):
Oil swaps and collars	$	34,779		$	(1,374	)	$	(17,692	)	$	1,511
Natural gas swaps and collars		(18,876	)		14,348			(9,160	)		7,903
Natural gas basis differential contracts		5,743			(2,050	)		(5,910	)		(879	)
Derivative monetizations		193			7,097			(111,144	)		102,352

Non-hedge derivative gains (losses)	$	21,839		$	18,021		$	(143,906	)	$	110,887

Total gains (losses) from derivative activities:	$	13,633		$	18,021		$	(136,019	)	$	109,188

Due primarily to a decline in average NYMEX forward strip oil prices as of June 30, 2010 compared to March 31, 2010, we recognized a gain on oil derivatives of $24.9 million during the second quarter of 2010. This includes an $8.6 million loss associated with derivatives for which hedge accounting has been discontinued. Due primarily to an increase in average NYMEX forward strip oil prices as of June 30, 2009 compared to March 31, 2009, we recognized a loss on oil derivatives of $11.7 million during the second quarter of 2009. This includes a $6.1 million gain associated with derivatives for which hedge accounting had previously been discontinued.

Due primarily to an increase in average NYMEX forward strip gas prices as of June 30, 2010 and 2009 compared to March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, partially offset by low natural gas prices prevalent during the second quarters of 2010 and 2009, we recognized a non-hedge loss on natural gas derivatives of $4.5 million and $1.3 million during the second quarters of 2010 and 2009, respectively. In addition, during the second quarters of 2010 and 2009, respectively, we reclassified into earnings gains of $0.3 million and $1.8 million that were associated with derivatives for which hedge accounting was discontinued in 2008.

During the second quarter of 2010, gains on natural gas basis differential contracts were $3.7 million primarily due to lower average contractual prices and higher differentials indicated by the forward commodity price curves as of June 30, 2010 compared to March 31, 2010, partially offset by the low basis differentials prevalent during the period. During the second quarter of 2009, losses on natural gas basis differential contracts were $6.8 million, primarily due to lower differentials indicated by the forward commodity price curves as of June 30, 2009 compared to March 31, 2009.

During the second quarter of 2010, we unwound and monetized oil swaps and collars and natural gas collars with original settlement dates from April 2010 through December 2012 for net proceeds of $7.1 million, and we recognized gains of $7.3 million associated with these transactions. During the second quarter of 2009, we monetized oil swaps and collars with original settlement dates from January 2012 through December 2013 for proceeds of $102.4 million. As a result of this monetization, losses of $8.8 million were recognized in earnings during the second quarter of 2009, and gains of $81.9 million were deferred through other comprehensive income.

Primarily as a result of the above transactions, our statement of operations for the second quarter of 2010 included total net gains on derivative activities of $31.7 million compared to total net losses on derivative activities of $26.8 million for the comparable period in 2009.

The effects of derivative activities on our results of operations and cash flows for the first half of 2010 and 2009 were as follows:


	Six months ended June 30,
	2010						2009
(dollars in thousands)	Non-cash fair value adjustment			Cash receipts (payments)			Non-cash fair value adjustment			Cash receipts (payments)
Gain (loss) from oil and natural gas hedging activities:
Oil swaps	$	(8,551	)	$	(5,504	)	$	14,114		$	2,932
Natural gas swaps		864			—			4,645			—

Gain (loss) from oil and natural gas hedging activities:	$	(7,687	)	$	(5,504	)	$	18,759		$	2,932

Non-hedge derivative gains (losses):
Oil swaps and collars	$	33,042		$	(815	)	$	(19,560	)	$	4,016
Natural gas swaps and collars		4,430			25,964			25,826			15,684
Natural gas basis differential contracts		7,495			(6,489	)		(10,236	)		892
Derivative monetizations		193			7,097			(111,188	)		111,874

Non-hedge derivative gains (losses)	$	45,160		$	25,757		$	(115,158	)	$	132,466

Total gains (losses) from derivative activities:	$	37,473		$	20,253		$	(96,399	)	$	135,398

We reclassified into earnings an $8.6 million loss associated with oil derivatives for which hedge accounting has been discontinued, and we made payments on oil hedges of $5.5 million during the first six months of 2010. In addition, due primarily to a decline in average NYMEX forward strip oil prices as of June 30, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009, we recognized a non-hedge gain on oil derivatives of $32.2 million during the first half of 2010. We reclassified into earnings a $14.5 million gain associated with oil derivatives for which hedge accounting had previously been discontinued, and we received payments on oil hedges of $2.9 million during the first six months of 2009. In addition, due primarily to an increase in average NYMEX forward strip oil prices as of June 30, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008, we recognized a non-hedge loss on oil derivatives of $15.5 million during the first half of 2009.

Due primarily to low natural gas prices prevalent during the period, we recognized a non-hedge gain on natural gas derivatives of $30.4 million during the first six months of 2010. Due primarily to a decrease in average NYMEX forward strip gas prices as of June 30, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008, combined with low natural gas prices prevalent during the period, we recognized a non-hedge gain on natural gas derivatives of $41.5 million during the first six months of 2009. In addition, during the first six months of 2010 and 2009, respectively, we reclassified into earnings gains of $0.9 million and $4.6 million that were associated with derivatives for which hedge accounting was discontinued in 2008.

During the first half of 2010, gains on natural gas basis differential contracts were $1.0 million primarily due to lower average contractual prices and higher differentials indicated by the forward commodity price curves as of June 30, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009, partially offset by the low basis differentials prevalent during the period. During the first half of 2009, losses on natural gas basis differential contracts were $9.3 million, primarily due to lower differentials indicated by the forward commodity price curves as of June 30, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008.

During the first half of 2010, we unwound and monetized oil swaps and collars and natural gas collars with original settlement dates from April 2010 through December 2012 for net proceeds of $7.1 million, and we recognized gains of $7.3 million associated with these transactions. During the first half of 2009, we monetized natural gas swaps and oil swaps and collars with original settlement dates from May through October of 2009 and from January 2012 through December 2013, respectively, for total net proceeds of $111.9 million. As a result of these transactions, gains of $0.7 million were recognized in earnings during the first six months of 2009, and gains of $81.9 million were deferred through other comprehensive income.

Primarily as a result of the above transactions, our statements of operations for the first half of 2010 and 2009 included total net gains on derivative activities of $57.7 million and $39.0 million, respectively.

Lease operating expenses


	Three months ended June 30,				Percent		Six months ended June 30,				Percent increase
(dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		increase		2010		2009		(decrease)
Lease operating expenses	$	27,256	$	23,660	15.2	%	$	51,675	$	51,163	1.0	%

Lease operating expenses per Boe	$	13.30	$	12.14	9.6	%	$	13.19	$	13.28	(0.7	)%

Lease operating costs are sensitive to changes in demand for field equipment, services, and qualified operational personnel, which is driven by demand for oil and natural gas. However, the timing of changes in operating costs may lag behind changes in commodity prices.

During the second quarter of 2010, lease operating expenses increased $3.6 million, or $1.16 per Boe, compared to the second quarter of 2009, primarily due to our increased activity combined with the upward pressure on operating and service costs associated with the improvement in oil prices during the first half of 2010. Electricity and fuel costs and workover costs increased by $1.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively, for operated properties during the second quarter of 2010 compared to the second quarter of 2009.

Due primarily to lower overall operating and service costs during the first quarter of 2010, lease operating expenses for the first half of 2010 were comparable to lease operating expenses for the first half of 2009. If oil prices remain strong, we expect absolute and per unit operating costs to increase as well.

Production taxes (which include ad valorem taxes)


	Three months ended June 30,				Percent		Six months ended June 30,				Percent
(dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		increase		2010		2009		increase
Production taxes	$	6,190	$	4,941	25.3	%	$	13,180	$	8,801	49.8	%

Production taxes per Boe	$	3.02	$	2.54	18.9	%	$	3.36	$	2.28	47.4	%

Production taxes generally change in proportion to oil and natural gas sales. The increase in production taxes during the second quarter of 2010 compared to the second quarter of 2009 was primarily due to the 33% increase in average realized prices combined with the 5% increase in sales volumes. The increase in production taxes during the first half of 2010 compared to the first half of 2009 was primarily due to the 58% increase in average realized prices combined with the 2% increase in sales volumes.

Depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”)


	Three months ended June 30,				Percent increase		Six months ended June 30				Percent increase
(dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		(decrease)		2010		2009		(decrease)
DD&A:
Oil and natural gas properties	$	21,956	$	22,368	(1.8	)%	$	43,449	$	49,706	(12.6	)%
Property and equipment		2,306		2,184	5.6	%		4,546		4,363	4.2	%
Accretion of asset retirement obligation		805		726	10.9	%		1,593		1,427	11.6	%

Total DD&A	$	25,067	$	25,278	(0.8	)%	$	49,588	$	55,496	(10.6	)%

DD&A per Boe:
Oil and natural gas properties	$	10.72	$	11.48	(6.6	)%	$	11.09	$	12.90	(14.0	)%
Other fixed assets		1.51		1.49	1.3	%		1.57		1.51	4.0	%

Total DD&A per Boe	$	12.23	$	12.97	(5.7	)%	$	12.66	$	14.41	(12.1	)%

We adjust our DD&A rate on oil and natural gas properties each quarter for significant changes in our estimates of oil and natural gas reserves and costs, and thus our DD&A rate could change significantly in the future. DD&A on oil and natural gas properties decreased $0.4 million in the second quarter of 2010 compared to the second quarter of 2009. The lower rate per equivalent unit of production reduced DD&A by $1.5 million, which was partially offset by a $1.1 million increase in DD&A caused by the increase in production. Our DD&A rate per equivalent unit of production decreased $0.76 to $10.72 per Boe primarily due to the increase in reserves resulting from higher commodity prices.

DD&A on oil and natural gas properties decreased $6.3 million in the first half of 2010 compared to the first half of 2009. The lower rate per equivalent unit of production reduced DD&A by $7.1 million, which was partially offset by a $0.8 million increase in DD&A caused by the increase in production. Our DD&A rate per equivalent unit of production decreased $1.81 to $11.09 per Boe primarily due to the increase in reserves resulting from higher commodity prices.

Impairment of oil and gas properties

In accordance with the full-cost method of accounting, the net capitalized costs of oil and natural gas properties are not to exceed their related estimated future net revenues discounted at 10% (“PV-10 value”), as adjusted for our cash flow hedge positions and net of tax considerations, plus the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproved properties. During the first quarter of 2009, natural gas prices declined significantly as compared to the December 31, 2008 spot price of $5.62 per Mcf. Based on March 31, 2009 spot prices of $49.66 per Bbl of oil and $3.63 per Mcf of natural gas, the internally estimated PV-10 value of our reserves declined by 13.5% compared to the PV-10 value at December 31, 2008. As a result, we recorded a ceiling test impairment of oil and natural gas properties of $240.8 million during the first quarter of 2009. The effect of derivative contracts accounted for as cash flow hedges, based on the March 31, 2009 spot prices, increased the full cost ceiling by $169.0 million, thereby reducing the ceiling test write down by the same amount.

Our estimate of oil and natural gas reserves as of June 30, 2010 was prepared using an average price for oil and natural gas based upon the first day of each month for the prior twelve months as required by the SEC’s Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting and the updated guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) relating to Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation and Disclosures, which we adopted effective December 31, 2009. As of June 30, 2010, the cost center ceiling exceeded the net capitalized cost of our oil and natural gas properties and no additional ceiling test impairment was recorded. The PV-10 value of our reserves was estimated based on average prices of $75.76 per Bbl of oil and $4.10 per Mcf of gas for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010. A decline in oil and natural gas prices subsequent to June 30, 2010 could result in additional ceiling test write downs in future periods. The amount of any future impairment is difficult to predict, and will depend on the average oil and natural gas prices during each period, the incremental proved reserves added during each period, and additional capital spent.

General and administrative expenses (“G&A”)


	Three months ended June 30						Percent		Six months ended June 30						Percent
(dollars in thousands)	2010			2009			increase		2010			2009			increase
Gross G&A expenses	$	11,543		$	8,602		34.2	%	$	21,179		$	17,830		18.8	%
Capitalized exploration and development costs		(3,672	)		(2,696	)	36.2	%		(6,868	)		(5,556	)	23.8	%

Net G&A expenses	$	7,871		$	5,906		33.3	%	$	14,311		$	12,274		16.6	%

Average G&A cost per Boe	$	3.84		$	3.03		26.7	%	$	3.65		$	3.19		14.4	%

General and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 increased by $0.81 per Boe and $0.46 per Boe, respectively, compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, primarily due to higher compensation costs caused by our heightened level of activity. G&A expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 include stock-based compensation expense of $0.7 million and $0.8 million, respectively, of which $0.7 million is associated with initial grants of restricted stock under the 2010 Plan that were awarded to certain employees on April 12, 2010. G&A expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 include stock-based compensation expense of $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively, associated with our Phantom Stock Plan.

Litigation settlement

Effective April 15, 2009, we settled a lawsuit against John Milton Graves Trust u/t/a 6/11/2004, et al. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, the Sellers paid us $7.1 million and we retained $0.4 million contained in an escrow account, which amounts settled all claims related to the litigation. In addition, the parties issued mutual releases, dismissed with prejudice the pending litigation and the claims made therein, and the Sellers agreed to take action to clear the title to certain properties purchased by us in the Calumet acquisition.

As a result of the settlement, as of June 30, 2009, a $14.4 million receivable and a $4.4 million payable related to the litigation were eliminated, the escrow cash account was reclassified to operating cash, and we recorded a charge to expense of $2.9 million.

Interest expense

The following table presents interest expense for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		2010		2009
Revolver interest	$	1,749	$	6,920	$	8,016	$	13,772
8 1/2% Senior Notes, due 2015		7,120		7,102		14,235		14,199
8 7/8% Senior Notes, due 2017		7,416		7,397		14,827		14,791
Bank fees and other interest		3,490		1,301		5,249		2,422

Total interest expense	$	19,775	$	22,720	$	42,327	$	45,184

Average long-term borrowings	$	840,585	$	1,239,277	$	1,008,435	$	1,254,881

Total interest expense decreased by nearly $3.0 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, primarily due to decreased levels of borrowings. Bank fees and other interest for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 includes the $2.2 million write off of prepaid bank fees associated with our Seventh Restated Credit Agreement.

Production tax credits

During 2006, we purchased interests in two venture capital limited liability companies resulting in a total investment of $15.0 million. Our return on the investment was the receipt of $2 of Oklahoma tax credits for every $1 invested and was recouped from our Oklahoma production taxes. The investments were accounted for as a production tax benefit asset and were netted against tax credits realized in other income using the effective yield method over the expected recovery period. Other income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 included Oklahoma production tax credits of $2.7 million and $13.5 million, respectively. No such income was received during the first half of 2010, and this source of income will not be available in future periods.

Discontinued Operations

In the second quarter of 2009, we committed to a plan to sell the assets of these divisions, and on June 8, 2009, we sold the assets of the ESP division to Global Oilfield Services, Inc. (“Global”) for a cash price of approximately $24.7 million after working capital adjustments. We paid off notes payable attributed to certain assets sold to Global in the amount of $1.6 million.

There was no activity associated with these divisions in the first or second quarter of 2010. The operating results of these divisions for the first and second quarters of 2009 have been reclassified as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations as detailed in the table below.


(dollars in thousands)	Three months ended June 30, 2009			Six months ended June 30, 2009
Revenues	$	2,774		$	7,026
Operating expenses		(2,777	)		(6,954	)
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization		(178	)		(403	)
Gain on sale		9,004			9,004

Income before income taxes		8,823			8,673
Income tax expense		3,396			3,338

Income from discontinued operations	$	5,427		$	5,335

There were no assets held for sale or liabilities associated with discontinued operations as of June 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009.

Non-GAAP financial measure and reconciliation

Management uses adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental financial measurement to evaluate our operational trends. Items excluded generally represent non-cash adjustments, the timing and amount of which cannot be reasonably estimated and are not considered by management when measuring our overall operating performance. In addition, adjusted EBITDA is generally consistent with the Consolidated EBITDAX ratio that is used in the covenant calculation required under our Credit Agreement described in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section above. We consider compliance with this covenant to be material. Adjusted EBITDA is used as a supplemental financial measurement in the evaluation of our business and should not be considered as an alternative to net income, as an indicator of our operating performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities, or as a measure of liquidity. Adjusted EBITDA is not defined under GAAP and, accordingly, it may not be a comparable measurement to those used by other companies.

We define adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss), adjusted to exclude (1) interest and other financing costs, net of capitalized interest, (2) income taxes, (3) depreciation, depletion and amortization, (4) unrealized (gain) loss on ineffective portion of hedges and reclassification adjustments, (5) non-cash change in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments, (6) interest income, (7) non-cash deferred compensation expense, (8) gain or loss on disposed assets, and (9) impairment charges and other significant, unusual, non-cash charges. Through March 31, 2010, our calculation of adjusted EBITDA excluded any cash proceeds received from the monetization of derivatives with a scheduled maturity date more than 12 months following the date of such monetization, in accordance with the terms of our Seventh Restated Credit Agreement.

The First Amendment to our Eighth Restated Credit Agreement, dated July 26, 2010, modified the definition of Consolidated EBITDAX to (1) permit cash proceeds received from the monetization of derivatives to be included in the calculation of Consolidated EBITDAX, to the extent that such monetizations, in any period between scheduled redeterminations, do not exceed 5% of the borrowing base then in effect, and (2) permit the exclusion from the calculation of Consolidated EBITDAX of up to $4.5 million in one-time cash expenses associated with our financing transactions that were incurred and paid during the second quarter of 2010.

Beginning with the second quarter of 2010, we have changed our calculation of adjusted EBITDA to include cash proceeds received from the monetization of derivatives with a scheduled maturity date more than 12 months following the date of such monetization, to the extent permitted by the First Amendment to our Eighth Restated Credit Agreement. However, we have not changed our calculation of adjusted EBITDA to exclude our one-time cash expenses associated with our financing transactions. As a result of the permitted exclusion of these expenses, our Consolidated EBITDAX as calculated for covenant compliance purposes is approximately $2.3 million higher than our adjusted EBITDA for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.

The following table provides a reconciliation of our net income (loss) to adjusted EBITDA for the specified periods:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net income (loss)	$	24,878		$	(17,724	)	$	50,342		$	(142,548	)
Interest expense		19,775			22,720			42,327			45,184
Income tax expense (benefit)		16,340			(10,772	)		32,409			(89,178	)
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization		25,067			25,456			49,588			55,899
Unrealized (gain) loss on ineffective portion of hedges and reclassification adjustments		8,206			(7,887	)		7,687			(18,759	)
Non-cash change in fair value of non-hedge derivative instruments		(31,257	)		143,906			(54,578	)		115,158
Proceeds from monetization of derivatives with a scheduled maturity date more than 12 months from the monetization date excluded from EBITDA		—			(102,352	)		—			(102,352	)
Proceeds from monetization of derivatives with a scheduled maturity date more than 12 months from the monetization date included in EBITDA		9,418			—			9,418			—
Interest income		(20	)		(71	)		(112	)		(172	)
Stock-based compensation expense		701			474			867			631
Gain on disposed assets		(32	)		(9,004	)		(74	)		(9,005	)
Loss on impairment of oil and gas properties		—			—			—			240,790
Loss on litigation settlement		—			—			—			2,928

Adjusted EBITDA	$	73,076		$	44,746		$	137,874		$	98,576

Critical accounting policies and estimates

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these statements requires us to make assumptions and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience and other sources that we believe are reasonable at the time. Actual results may differ from the estimates and assumptions we used in preparation of our financial statements. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on a regular basis. Described below are the most significant policies and the related estimates and assumptions we apply in the preparation of our financial statements. See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for an additional discussion of accounting policies and estimates made by management.

Revenue recognition. We derive almost all of our revenue from the sale of crude oil and natural gas produced from our oil and natural gas properties. Revenue is recorded in the month the product is delivered to the purchaser. We receive payment on substantially all of these sales from one to three months after delivery. At the end of each month, we estimate the amount of production delivered to purchasers that month and the price we will receive. Variances between our estimated revenue and actual payment received for all prior months are recorded in the month payment is received.

Derivative instruments. Certain of our oil and natural gas derivative contracts are designed to be treated as cash flow hedges under GAAP. This policy significantly impacts the timing of revenue or expense recognized from this activity, as our contracts are adjusted to their fair value at the end of each month. The effective portion of the hedge gain or loss, meaning the portion of the change in the fair value of the contract that offsets the change in the expected future cash flows from our forecasted sales of production, is recognized in income when the hedged production is reported as revenue. We reflect this as an adjustment to our revenue in the “Gain (loss) from oil and natural gas hedging activities” line in our consolidated statements of operations. Until hedged production is reported in earnings and the contract settles, the effective portion of change in the fair value of the contract is reported in the “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” line item in stockholders’ equity. The ineffective portion of the hedge gain or loss is reported in the “Gain (loss) from oil and natural gas hedging activities” line item each period. Our derivative contracts that do not qualify for cash flow hedge treatment, or have not been designated as cash flow hedges, are marked to their period end market values and the change in the fair value of the contracts is included in the “Non-hedge derivative gains (losses)” line in our consolidated statements of operations. Effective April 1, 2010, we elected to de-designate all of our commodity derivative contracts that had previously been designated as cash flow hedges and to discontinue hedge accounting prospectively. As a result, our reported earnings could include large non-cash fluctuations, particularly in volatile pricing environments.

We determine the fair value of our crude oil, natural gas, and basis swaps by reference to forward pricing curves for oil and natural gas futures contracts. The difference between the forward price curve and the contractual fixed price is discounted to the measurement date using a credit risk adjusted discount rate. In certain less liquid markets, forward prices are not as readily available. In these circumstances, swaps are valued using internally developed methodologies that consider historical relationships among various commodities that result in management’s best estimate of fair value. These contracts are classified as Level 3 in accordance with the fair value hierarchy defined by the FASB. We have determined that the fair value methodology described above for the remainder of our swaps is consistent with observable market inputs and have categorized them as Level 2. We determine fair value for our oil and natural gas collars using an option pricing model which takes into account market volatility, market prices, contract parameters, and credit risk. Due to unavailability of observable volatility data input for our collars, we have determined that all of our collars’ fair value measurements are categorized as Level 3. Derivative instruments are discounted using a rate that incorporates our nonperformance risk for derivative liabilities, and our counterparties’ credit risk for derivative assets. Our derivative contracts have been executed with the institutions that are parties to our revolving credit facility. We believe the credit risks associated with all of these institutions are acceptable.

Oil and natural gas properties.

•

Full cost accounting. We use the full cost method of accounting for our oil and natural gas properties. Under this method, all costs incurred in the exploration and development of oil and natural gas properties are capitalized into a cost center. These costs include drilling and equipping productive wells, dry hole costs, seismic costs and delay rentals. Capitalized costs also include salaries, employee benefits, consulting services and other expenses that directly relate to our exploration and development activities.

•

Proved oil and natural gas reserves quantities. Proved oil and natural gas reserves are the quantities of crude oil and natural gas which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible—from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations—prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain. The estimates of proven reserves for a given reservoir may change significantly over time as a result of changing prices, operating cost, additional development activity and the actual operating performance.

•

Depreciation, depletion and amortization. The quantities of proved oil and natural gas reserves are a significant component of our calculation of depreciation, depletion and amortization expense and revisions in such estimates may alter the rate of future expense. The depreciation, depletion and amortization rate is determined using the units-of-production method based on estimates of proved oil and natural gas reserves and production, which are converted to a common unit of measure based on the relative energy content.

•

Full cost ceiling limitation. Under the full cost method, the net capitalized costs of oil and natural gas properties recorded on our balance sheet cannot exceed the estimated future net revenues discounted at 10%, adjusted for the impact of derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges, plus the lower of cost or fair market value of unproved properties. The ceiling calculation requires that prices and costs used to determine the estimated future net revenues exclude escalations based upon future conditions. If oil and natural gas prices decline or if we have downward revisions to our estimated reserve quantities, it is possible that write downs of our oil and natural gas properties could occur in the future.

•

Costs not subject to amortization. Costs of unevaluated properties are excluded from our amortization base until we have evaluated the properties. The costs associated with unevaluated leasehold acreage and seismic data, exploratory wells currently drilling, and capitalized interest are initially excluded from our amortization base. Leasehold costs are either transferred to the amortization base with the costs of drilling a well or are assessed quarterly for possible impairment. Our future depreciation, depletion and amortization rate would increase if costs are transferred to the amortization base without any associated reserves.

•

Future development and abandonment costs. Our future development costs include costs to be incurred to obtain access to proved reserves such as drilling costs and the installation of production equipment. Future abandonment costs include costs to plug and abandon our oil and natural gas properties and related facilities. We develop estimates of these costs for each of our properties based on their location, type of facility, market demand for equipment and currently available procedures. Because these costs typically extend many years into the future, estimating these future costs is difficult and requires management to make numerous judgments. These judgments are subject to future revisions from changing technology and regulatory requirements. We review our assumptions and estimates of future development and future abandonment costs on a quarterly basis.

We record a liability for the estimated fair value of an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred and the corresponding cost is capitalized by increasing the carrying value of the related asset. The liability is accreted to its present value each period and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset.

We use the present value of estimated cash flows related to our asset retirement obligation to determine the fair value. Significant assumptions used in estimating such obligations include estimates of the ultimate costs of dismantling and site restoration, inflation factors, credit adjusted discount rates, timing of settlement, and changes in the legal, regulatory, environmental, and political environments, all of which are Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy. To the extent future revisions to these assumptions impact the present value of the existing asset retirement obligation liability, a corresponding adjustment will be required for the related asset. We believe the estimates and judgments reflected in our financial statements are reasonable but are necessarily subject to the uncertainties we have just described. Accordingly, any significant variance in any of the above assumptions or factors could materially affect our estimated future cash flows.

Income taxes. Deferred income taxes are provided for the difference between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the carrying amount in our financial statements. This difference will result in taxable income or deductions in future years when the reported amount of the asset or liability is settled. Since our tax returns are filed after the financial statements are prepared, estimates are required in valuing tax assets and liabilities. We record adjustments to actual in the period we file our tax returns.

Valuation allowance for NOL carryforwards. In computing our income tax expense, we assess the need for a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, which consist primarily of net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards. For federal income tax purposes these NOL carryforwards expire 15 to 20 years from the year of origination. We generally assess our ability to fully utilize these carryforwards by estimating expected future taxable income based on the assumption that we will produce our existing reserves, as scheduled for production in our reserve report and by analyzing the expected reversal of existing deferred tax liabilities. These computations are imprecise due to the extensive use of estimates and assumptions. Each quarter we assess our ability to utilize NOL carryforwards. We will record a valuation allowance for the amount of net deferred tax assets when, in management’s opinion, it is more likely than not that such asset will not be realized.

Also see the footnote disclosures included in Part 1, Item 1 of this report.

Recent accounting pronouncements

See recently adopted and issued accounting standards in Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements, Note 1: Nature of operations and summary of significant accounting policies.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Oil and natural gas prices. Our financial condition, results of operations and capital resources are highly dependent upon the prevailing market prices of, and demand for, oil and natural gas. These commodity prices are subject to wide fluctuations and market uncertainties due to a variety of factors that are beyond our control. We cannot predict future oil and natural gas prices with any degree of certainty. Sustained declines in oil and natural gas prices may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations, and may also reduce the amount of net oil and natural gas reserves that we can produce economically. Any reduction in reserves, including reductions due to price fluctuations, can reduce our borrowing base under our Credit Agreement and adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to obtain capital for our acquisition, exploration and development activities. Based on our production for the first half of 2010, our gross revenues from oil and gas sales would change approximately $1.2 million for each $0.10 change in natural gas prices and $2.0 million for each $1.00 change in oil prices.

To mitigate a portion of our exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices, we enter into commodity price swaps, costless collars, and basis protection swaps. For commodity price swaps, we receive a fixed price for the hedged commodity and pay a floating market price to the counterparty. The fixed-price payment and the floating-price payment are netted, resulting in a net amount due to or from the counterparty. Effective April 1, 2010, we have elected to de-designate all of our commodity swap contracts that had previously been designated as cash flow hedges and to discontinue hedge accounting prospectively. Therefore, the changes in fair value and settlement of these derivative contracts subsequent to March 31, 2010 are recognized as non-hedge derivative gains (losses). This can have a significant impact on our results of operations due to the volatility of the underlying commodity prices.

Collars contain a fixed floor price (put) and ceiling price (call). If the market price exceeds the call strike price or falls below the put strike price, we receive the fixed price and pay the market price. If the market price is between the call and the put strike price, no payments are due from either party. Our collars have not been designated as hedges. Therefore, the changes in fair value and settlement of these derivative contracts are recognized as non-hedge derivative gains (losses). This can have a significant impact on our results of operations due to the volatility of the underlying commodity prices.

Our outstanding oil and gas derivative instruments as of June 30, 2010, are summarized below:


	Crude oil swaps			Crude oil collars
	Volume MBbl	Weighted average fixed price to be received		Volume MBbl	Weighted average range		Percent of PDP Production(1)
3Q 2010	652	$	74.25	60	$	110.00 -$168.55	83.5	%
4Q 2010	633		74.65	60		110.00 - 168.55	83.3	%
1Q 2011	648		72.38	21		110.00 - 153.00	82.2	%
2Q 2011	639		72.46	21		110.00 - 153.00	82.8	%
3Q 2011	619		71.89	21		110.00 - 153.00	81.8	%
4Q 2011	609		71.52	21		110.00 - 153.00	82.0	%

	3,800			204


	Natural gas swaps			Natural gas collars
	Volume Bbtu	Weighted average fixed price to be received		Volume Bbtu	Weighted average range		Percent of PDP Production(1)
3Q 2010	3,700	$	7.01	450		$ 10.00 - $11.67	74.4	%
4Q 2010	3,450		7.55	450		10.00 - 11.67	74.4	%
1Q 2011	3,150		7.66	—			63.2	%
2Q 2011	3,000		6.86	—			62.8	%
3Q 2011	3,000		7.03	—			65.3	%
4Q 2011	3,000		7.39	—			67.6	%

	19,300			900


	Natural gas basis protection swaps
	Volume Bbtu	Weighted average fixed price to be paid
3Q 2010	3,930	$	0.74
4Q 2010	4,350		0.70
1Q 2011	4,200		0.73
2Q 2011	3,860		0.64
3Q 2011	3,720		0.64
4Q 2011	3,610		0.65
1Q 2012	1,800		0.30
2Q 2012	1,800		0.30
3Q 2012	1,800		0.30
4Q 2012	1,800		0.30

	30,870

(1)	Based on our most recent internally estimated PDP production for such periods.

Interest rates. All of the outstanding borrowings under our Credit Agreement as of June 30, 2010, are subject to market rates of interest as determined from time to time by the banks. We may designate borrowings under our Credit Agreement as either ABR loans or Eurodollar loans. ABR loans bear interest at a fluctuating rate that is linked to the greater of (1) the Prime Rate, as defined in our Credit Agreement, (2) the Federal Funds Effective Rate, as defined in the Credit Agreement, plus ¹/2 of 1%, or (3) the Adjusted LIBO rate, as defined in our Credit Agreement, plus 1%. Eurodollar loans bear interest at a fluctuating rate that is linked to LIBOR. Any increases in these rates can have an adverse impact on our results of operations and cash flow. Assuming a constant debt level of $450.0 million, equal to our borrowing base, the cash flow impact for a 12-month period resulting from a 100 basis point change in interest rates would be $4.5 million.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure controls and procedures

We have established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the officers who certify our financial reports and to other members of senior management and the Board of Directors. Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Internal control over financial reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the opinion of management, there are no material pending legal proceedings to which we or any of our subsidiaries are a party or of which any of our property is the subject. However, due to the nature of our business, certain legal or administrative proceedings may arise from time to time in the ordinary course of business.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

Information with respect to risk factors is included under Item 1A. of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors since the filing of such Form 10-K.

The recent adoption of The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or the Dodd-Frank Act, could have an adverse effect on our ability to use derivative instruments to reduce the effect of commodity price and other risks associated with our business.

We use derivative instruments to manage our commodity price risk. The United States Congress recently adopted comprehensive financial reform legislation that establishes federal oversight and regulation of the over-the-counter derivatives market and entities that participate in that market. The Dodd-Frank Act requires the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) and the SEC to promulgate rules and regulations implementing the new legislation within 360 days from the date of enactment. The CFTC has also proposed regulations to set position limits for certain futures and option contracts in the major energy markets, although it is not possible at this time to predict whether or when the CFTC will adopt those rules or include comparable provisions in its rulemaking under the new legislation. The financial reform legislation may also require us to comply with margin requirements and with certain clearing and trade-execution requirements in connection with our derivative activities, although the application of those provisions to us is uncertain at this time. The financial reform legislation may also require the counterparties to our derivative instruments to spin off some of their derivatives activities to a separate entity, which may not be as creditworthy as the current counterparty. The new legislation and any new regulations could significantly increase the cost of derivative contracts (including through requirements to post collateral which could adversely affect our available liquidity), materially alter the terms of derivative contracts, reduce the availability of derivatives to protect against risks we encounter, reduce our ability to monetize or restructure our existing derivative contracts, and increase our exposure to less creditworthy counterparties. If we reduce our use of derivatives as a result of the legislation and regulations, our results of operations may become more volatile and our cash flows may be less predictable, which could adversely affect our ability to plan for and fund capital expenditures. Finally, the legislation was intended, in part, to reduce the volatility of oil and natural gas prices, which some legislators attributed to speculative trading in derivatives and commodity instruments related to oil and natural gas. Our revenues could therefore be adversely affected if a consequence of the legislation and regulations is to lower commodity prices. Any of these consequences could have a material adverse effect on us, our financial condition and our results of operations.

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS


Exhibit No.		Description

10.28		First Amendment to Eighth Restated Credit Agreement dated as of July 26, 2010.


Exhibit No.		Description

31.1		Certification by Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act

31.2		Certification by Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act

32.1		Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


CHAPARRAL ENERGY, INC.

By:		/s/ Mark A. Fischer
Name:		Mark A. Fischer
Title:		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

By:		/s/ Joseph O. Evans
Name:		Joseph O. Evans
Title:		Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
		(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: August 10, 2010

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit No.		Description

10.28		First Amendment to Eighth Restated Credit Agreement dated as of July 26, 2010.


Exhibit No.		Description

31.1		Certification by Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act

31.2		Certification by Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act

32.1		Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Chaparral Energy, Inc. - FORM 10-Q - August 10, 2010

Attached files

Chaparral Energy, Inc. Reports

Also read