CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL CORP - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-2.3 - AMENDMENT TO - CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL CORP	exhibit2_3.htm
EX-2.1 - STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT - CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL CORP	exhibit2_1.htm
EX-33 - EXHIBIT 32 - CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL CORP	exhibit32_2010q2.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31 - CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL CORP	exhibit31_22010q2.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31 - CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL CORP	exhibit31_12010q2.htm
EX-2.2 - ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT - CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL CORP	exhibit2_2.htm

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


[Ö]		Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
		For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
		OR
[ ]		Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
		For the transition period from__________ to__________

Commission File Number: 2-94863

[cnc10q_20100630002.gif]

CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



New York (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		16-1234823 (IRS Employer Identification Number)

72 South Main Street Canandaigua, New York (Address of principal executive offices)		14424 (Zip code)

(585) 394-4260
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.


Yes [Ö]		No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months.


Yes [ ]		No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [Ö] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [ ] No [Ö]

The registrant had 473,023 shares of common stock, par value $20.00, outstanding at July 24, 2010.

Forward-Looking Statements

This report, including information incorporated by reference, contains, and future filings by Canandaigua National Corporation on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K and future oral and written statements, press releases, and letters to shareholders by Canandaigua National Corporation and its management may contain, certain "forward-looking statements" intended to qualify for the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used or incorporated by reference in the Company's disclosures and documents, the words "anticipate," "believe," "contemplate," "estimate," "expect," "foresee," "project," "target," "goal," "budget" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks discussed within this document and the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. These forward-looking statements are based on currently available financial, economic, and competitive data and management's views and assumptions regarding future events. These forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain, so should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated, expected, projected, targeted, or budgeted. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of the document. We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to publicly release any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained herein. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking statements.

CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
June 30, 2010


PART I -- FINANCIAL INFORMATION		PAGE

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Condensed consolidate d balance sheets at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009		4

Condensed consoli dated statements of income for the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009.		5

Condensed consolidated statements of stockholders' equity for the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009		6

Condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009		7

Notes t o condensed consolidated financial statements		8

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations		18

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		28

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		28

PART II -- OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings		29

Item 1A. Risk Factors		29

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		29

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		29

*Item 4. (Reserved)*		29

Item 5. Other Information		29

Item 6. Exhibits		31

SIGNATURES		32

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)


		June 30,	December 31,
		2010	2009
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	25,029	33,453
Interest-bearing deposits with other financial institutions		4,441	4,376
Federal funds sold		83,982	40,395
Securities:
- Available for sale, at fair value		117,225	118,925
- Held-to-maturity (fair value of $161,835 in 2010 and $165,913 in 2009)		155,383	159,183
Loans:
Commercial and industrial		205,867	214,841
Commercial mortgage		444,317	429,955
Residential mortgage - first lien		232,285	218,731
Residential mortgage - junior lien		86,245	83,236
Consumer-automobile indirect		167,604	171,902
Consumer and other		29,524	28,919
Loans held for sale		16,715	6,657
Total gross loans		1,182,557	1,154,241
Plus: Net deferred loan costs		5,463	5,698
Less: Allowance for loan losses		(14,911)	(14,232)
Loans - net		1,173,109	1,145,707
Premises and equipment - net		13,064	12,041
Accrued interest receivable		6,401	6,692
Federal Home Loan Bank stock and Federal Reserve Bank stock		2,819	2,689
Goodwill		8,818	8,818
Intangible assets		6,222	6,719
Prepaid FDIC Assessment		6,188	7,659
Other assets		21,277	19,343
Total Assets	$	1,623,958	1,566,000

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Deposits:
Demand
Non-interest-bearing	$	190,533	182,124
Interest-bearing		149,224	131,987
Savings and money market		636,031	573,983
Time		456,184	489,603
Total deposits		1,431,972	1,377,697
Borrowings		8,606	9,841
Junior subordinated debentures		51,547	51,547
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		12,657	15,180
Total Liabilities		1,504,782	1,454,265

Stockholders' Equity:
Common stock, $20 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized;
486,624 shares issued in 2010 and 2009		9,732	9,732
Additional paid-in capital		8,823	8,591
Retained earnings		103,679	97,795
Treasury stock, at cost (13,601 shares at June 30, 2010
and 15,788 at December 31, 2009)		(4,407)	(5,143)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net		1,349	760
Total Stockholders' Equity		119,176	111,735
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	1,623,958	1,566,000

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)


		Three months ended June 30,			Six months ended June 30,

		2010	2009		2010	2009
Interest income:
Loans, including fees	$	16,901	16,218	$	33,120	32,559
Securities		2,210	2,206		4,469	4,428
Federal funds sold and other		58	50		113	83
Total interest income		19,169	18,474		37,702	37,070
Interest expense:
Deposits		2,963	4,399		6,187	9,175
Borrowings		96	160		173	319
Junior subordinated debentures		732	751		1,477	1,499
Total interest expense		3,791	5,310		7,837	10,993
Net interest income		15,378	13,164		29,865	26,077
Provision for loan losses		525	1,400		2,950	2,555
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		14,853	11,764		26,915	23,522

Other income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		2,742	2,105		5,297	4,139
Trust and investment services income		2,598	2,327		5,404	4,626
Net gain on sale of mortgage loans		542	1,302		910	2,046
Mortgage servicing income, net		215	113		413	239
Loan-related fees		82	60		151	124
(Loss) on calls of securities and write-down, net		(99)	(165)		(104)	(162)
Other operating income		407	535		830	827
Total other income		6,487	6,277		12,901	11,839

Operating expenses:
Salaries and employee benefits		7,247	7,724		14,520	14,338
Occupancy, net		1,781	1,539		3,439	3,032
Marketing and public relations		595	487		1,150	942
Office supplies, printing and postage		349	370		719	743
Professional and other services		1,093	691		1,864	1,446
Technology and data processing		981	827		1,905	1,733
Intangible amortization		248	266		497	532
Other real estate operations		190	202		414	659
FDIC insurance		535	1,099		1,056	1,283
Other operating expenses		1,068	1,022		2,233	2,100
Total operating expenses		14,087	14,227		27,797	26,808

Income before income taxes		7,253	3,814		12,019	8,553
Income taxes		1,899	853		3,148	2,053
Net income	$	5,354	2,961	$	8,871	6,500

Basic earnings per share	$	11.36	6.28	$	18.83	13.78
Diluted earnings per share	$	11.19	6.18	$	18.53	13.56

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except share data)


						Accumulated
	Number of		Additional			Other
	Shares	Common	Paid-in	Retained	Treasury	Comprehensive
	Outstanding	Stock	Capital	Earnings	Stock	Income (Loss)	Total
Balance at December 31, 2009	470,836	9,732	8,591	97,795	(5,143)	760	111,735
Comprehensive income:
Change in fair value of
Interest rate swap,
net of taxes of $154		-	-	-	-	239	239
Change in unrealized gain on
securities available for sale,
net of taxes of $101		-	-	-	-	240	240
Plus reclassification adjustment
for realized losses included in
net income on called securities,
net of taxes of $58		-	-	-	-	110	110
Net income		-	-	8,871	-	-	8,871
Total comprehensive income							9,460
Shares issued as compensation	145	-	-	-	50	-	50
Purchase of treasury stock	(544)	-	-	-	(186)	-	(186)
Exercise of stock options,
including tax benefit of $232	2,586	-	232	(562)	872	-	542
Cash dividend - $5.15 per share		-	-	(2,425)	-	-	(2,425)
Balance at June 30, 2010	473,023	9,732	8,823	103,679	(4,407)	1,349	119,176


Balance at December 31, 2008	471,859	9,732	8,591	87,273	(4,819)	(339)	100,438
Comprehensive income:
Change in fair value of
Interest rate swap,
net of taxes of $99		-	-	-	-	156	156
Change in unrealized loss on
securities available for sale,
net of taxes of $224		-	-	-	-	375	375
Net income		-	-	6,500	-	-	6,500
Total comprehensive income							7,031
Recognition of stock option
expense
Purchase of treasury stock	(709)	-	-	-	(223)	-	(223)
Sale of treasury stock	106	-	-	(3)	36	-	33
Cash dividend - $4.85 per share		-	-	(2,289)	-	-	(2,289)
Balance at June 30, 2009	471,256	9,732	8,591	91,481	(5,006)	192	104,990

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)


		2010	2009
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net income	$	8,871	6,500
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		2,406	2,431
Provision for loan losses		2,950	2,555
Gain on sale of premises and equipment and other real estate, net		(6)	(19)
Writedown of other real estate		23	-
Deferred income tax benefit		(358)	(578)
(Income) loss from equity-method investments, net		(37)	33
Loss on calls of securities and write-down, net		104	162
Gain on sale of mortgage loans, net		(910)	(2,046)
Originations of loans held for sale		(84,537)	(170,558)
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale		75,389	164,614
Decrease (increase) in other assets		1,463	(1,377)
(Decrease) increase in all other liabilities		(2,130)	1,053
Net cash provided by operating activities		3,228	2,770

Cash flow from investing activities:
Securities available-for-sale:
Proceeds from maturities and calls		32,219	14,512
Purchases		(30,113)	(20,759)
Securities held to maturity:
Proceeds from maturities and calls		17,641	25,785
Purchases		(14,417)	(22,227)
Loan originations and principal collections, net		(21,726)	(23,578)
Purchase of premises and equipment		(2,091)	(1,190)
Purchase of FHLB and FRB stock, net		(130)	(16)
Investment in equity-method investments		(756)	(23)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate		364	225
Net cash used in investing activities		(19,009)	(27,271)

Cash flow from financing activities:
Net increase in demand, savings and money market deposits		87,694	84,903
Net increase (decrease) in time deposits		(33,419)	28,477
Overnight borrowings, net		-	(4,400)
Principal repayments on borrowings		(1,247)	(4,071)
Proceeds from sale of treasury stock		50	33
Payments to acquire treasury stock		(186)	(223)
Proceeds from issuance of treasury stock under stock option plan		310	-
Tax benefit from stock option exercise		232	-
Dividends paid		(2,425)	(2,289)
Net cash provided by financing activities		51,009	102,430

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		35,228	77,929
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period		78,224	32,670
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period	$	113,452	110,599

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	7,918	11,388
Income taxes paid		3,386	2,563

Supplemental schedule of noncash investing activities
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans	$	1,432	2,864

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)


(1) Basis of Presentation

	The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information. Such principles are applied on a basis consistent with those reflected in the December 31, 2009 Form 10-K Report of the Company filed with the SEC. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. Management has prepared the financial information included herein without audit by independent certified public accountants. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

	Amounts in prior periods' condensed consolidated financial statements are reclassified whenever necessary to conform to the current year's presentation. Management has evaluated the impact of subsequent events on these financial statements to the date of filing of this Form 10Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

(2) Dividend

On July 14, 2010, the Board of Directors declared a semi-annual $5.70 per share dividend on common stock to shareholders of record on July 24, 2010. The dividend was paid on August 2, 2010. This is in addition to the semi-annual $5.15 per share dividend on common stock declared in January 2010 and paid in February 2010.

(3) Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share includes the maximum dilutive effect of stock issuable upon conversion of stock options. Calculations for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 follow (dollars in thousands, except share data):

Three months

Six months

Ended June 30,

ended June 30,


For the three months ended June 30,		2010	2009	2010	2009
Basic Earnings Per Share:
Net income applicable to common shareholders	$	5,354	2,961	8,871	6,500
Weighted average common shares outstanding		471,256	471,379	471,048	471,558
Basic earnings per share	$	11.36	6.28	18.83	13.78

Diluted Earnings Per Share:
Net income applicable to common shareholders	$	5,354	2,961	8,871	6,500
Weighted average common shares outstanding		471,256	471,379	471,048	471,558
Effect of assumed exercise of stock options		7,392	7,674	7,656	7,825
Total		478,648	479,053	478,704	479,383
Diluted earnings per share	$	11.19	6.18	18.53	13.56

(4) Segment Information

The Company is organized into three reportable segments: the Company and its bank and Florida trust subsidiaries (Bank), CNB Mortgage Company (CNBM), and Genesee Valley Trust Company (GVT). These have been segmented due to differences in their distribution channels, the volatility of their earnings, and internal and external financial reporting requirements. The interim period reportable segment information for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 follows (dollars in thousands).


Three months ended June 30,		2010

		Bank	CNBM	GVT	Intersegment	Total
Net interest income	$	15,383	2	(3)	(4)	15,378
Non-interest income		4,807	1,015	969	(304)	6,487

Total revenues		20,190	1,017	966	(308)	21,865

Provision for loan losses		525	-	-	-	525
Intangible amortization		53	-	195	-	248
Other operating expenses		12,669	466	779	(75)	13,839

Total expenses		13,247	466	974	(75)	14,612

Income (loss) before tax		6,943	551	(8)	(233)	7,253
Income tax		1,899	217	36	(253)	1,899

Net income (loss)	$	5,044	334	(44)	20	5,354

Total identifiable assets	$	1,608,770	15,196	17,401	(17,409)	1,623,958


Three months ended June 30,		2009

		Bank	CNBM	GVT	Intersegment	Total
Net interest income	$	13,140	3	(17)	38	13,164
Non-interest income		5,024	1,982	848	(1,577)	6,277

Total revenues		18,164	1,985	831	(1,539)	19,441

Provision for loan losses		1,400	-	-	-	1,400
Intangible amortization		58	-	208	-	266
Other operating expenses		11,687	413	1,698	163	13,961

Total expenses		13,145	413	1,906	163	15,627

Income (loss) before tax		5,019	1,572	(1,075)	(1,702)	3,814
Income tax		853	622	(287)	(335)	853

Net income (loss)	$	4,166	950	(788)	(1,367)	2,961

Total identifiable assets	$	1,513,665	10,289	19,988	(14,595)	1,529,347

(4) Segment Information (continued)


Six months ended June 30,		2010

		Bank	CNBM	GVT	Intersegment	Total
Net interest income	$	29,875	6	(4)	(12)	29,865
Non-interest income		10,217	1,784	1,973	(1,073)	12,901

Total revenues		40,092	1,790	1,969	(1,085)	42,766

Provision for loan losses		2,950	-	-	-	2,950
Intangible amortization		108	-	389	-	497
Other operating expenses		24,869	927	1,729	(225)	27,300

Total expenses		27,927	927	2,118	(225)	30,747

Income (loss) before tax		12,165	863	(149)	(860)	12,019
Income tax		3,148	339	(5)	(334)	3,148

Net income (loss)	$	9,017	524	(144)	(526)	8,871


Six months ended June 30,		2009

		Bank	CNBM	GVT	Intersegment	Total
Net interest income	$	26,077	6	(31)	25	26,077
Non-interest income		9,388	3,237	1,748	(2,534)	11,839

Total revenues		35,465	3,243	1,717	(2,509)	37,916

Provision for loan losses		2,555	-	-	-	2,555
Intangible amortization		115	-	417	-	532
Other operating expenses		22,780	773	2,654	69	26,276

Total expenses		25,450	773	3,071	69	29,363

Income (loss) before tax		10,015	2,470	(1,354)	(2,578)	8,553
Income tax		2,053	973	(401)	(572)	2,053

Net income (loss)	$	7,962	1,497	(953)	(2,006)	6,500

The operating results of GVT for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 were negatively affected by a decline in revenues caused by the fall in fair value of assets under administration and a retirement expense accrual upon the former president’s early retirement.

The operating results of CNB Mortgage for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 declined significantly due to reduced volume of loan originations, particularly refinance activity, which slowed significantly at year-end 2009.


	(5) Loan Servicing Assets

The Company services first-lien, residential loans for the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company (FHLMC), also known as Freddie Mac, and certain commercial loans as lead participant. The associated servicing rights (assets) entitle the Company to a future stream of cash flows based on the outstanding principal balance of the loans and contractual servicing fees. Failure to service the loans in accordance with contractual requirements may lead to a termination of the servicing rights and the loss of future servicing fees.

The Company services all loans for FHLMC on a non-recourse basis; therefore, its credit risk is limited to temporary advances of funds to FHLMC, while FHLMC retains all credit risk associated with the loans. Commercial loans are serviced on a non- recourse basis, wherein the Company is subject to credit losses only to the extent of the proportionate share of the loan’s principal balance owned.

The Company’s contract to sell loans to FHLMC contains certain representations and warranties that if not met by the Company, would require the repurchase of such loans. The Company has not historically been subject to a material volume of repurchases. Gross servicing fees earned by the Company for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, amounted to $339,000 and $258,000, and for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $668,000 and $489,000, respectively. These fees are included in net mortgage servicing income on the statements of income.

(5) Loan Servicing Assets (continued)



The following table presents the changes in loan servicing assets for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, as well as the estimated fair value of the assets at the beginning and end of the period (in thousands).
		2010				2009
			Book	Estimated Fair		Book	Estimated Fair
			Value	Value		Value	Value
	Balance at January 1,	$	1,797	$ 2,893	$	855	1,597
	Originations		369			922
	Amortization		(255)			(250)
	Balance at June 30,	$	1,911	$ 2,834	$	1,527	$ 2,134

(6) Interest Rate Swap Agreement

The Company is exposed to interest rate risk as a result of both the timing of changes in interest rates of assets and liabilities, and the magnitude of those changes. In order to reduce this risk for the Company’s $30 million floating-rate junior subordinated debenture, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement in 2007, which expires on June 15, 2011. This interest rate swap agreement modifies the repricing characteristics of the debentures from a floating-rate debt (LIBOR +1.40%) to a fixed-rate debt (5.54%). For this swap agreement, amounts receivable or payable are recognized as accrued under the terms of the agreement, and the net differential is recorded as an adjustment to interest expense of the related debentures. The interest rate swap agreement is designated as a cash flow hedge. Therefore, the effective portion of the swap’s unrealized gain or loss was initially recorded as a component of other comprehensive income. The ineffective portion of the unrealized gain or loss, if any, is immediately reported in other operating income. The swap agreement is carried at fair value in Other Liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Condition.

In consideration of the pending expiration of the aforementioned agreement, the Company entered into a forward interest rate swap agreement on July 1, 2010. This swap becomes effective on June 15, 2011 and expires on June 15, 2021. This interest rate swap agreement will modify the repricing characteristics of the Company’s $30 million floating-rate junior subordinated debenture from a floating-rate debt (LIBOR +1.40%) to a fixed-rate debt (4.81%). The accounting for this is the same as the existing swap agreement.

(7) Fair Values of Financial Instruments

Current accounting pronouncements require disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments. Fair value is generally defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly, non-distressed sale between market participants at the measurement date. With the exception of certain marketable securities and one-to-four-family residential mortgage loans originated for sale, the Company’s financial instruments are not readily marketable and market prices do not exist. The Company, in attempting to comply with accounting disclosure pronouncements, has not attempted to market its financial instruments to potential buyers, if any exist. Since negotiated prices in illiquid markets depend upon the then present motivations of the buyer and seller, it is reasonable to assume that actual sales prices could vary widely from any estimate of fair value made without the benefit of negotiations. Additionally, changes in market interest rates can dramatically impact the value of financial instruments in a short period of time. Finally, the Company expects to retain substantially all assets and liabilities measured at fair value to their maturity or call date. Accordingly, the fair values disclosed herein are unlikely to represent the instruments’ liquidation values, and do not, with the exception of securities, consider exit costs, since they cannot be reasonably estimated by management.

The estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments are as follows (in thousands):


			June 30, 2010		December 31, 2009

			Carrying	Fair	Carrying	Fair
	Financial Assets:		Amount	Value	Amount	Value
	Cash and equivalents	$	113,452	113,452	78,224	78,224
	Securities, available-for-sale and held-to-maturity	$	275,427	281,879	280,797	287,527
	Loans-net	$	1,173,109	1,213,713	1,145,707	1,207,093
	Loan servicing assets	$	1,911	2,834	1,797	2,893

	Financial Liabilities:
	Deposits:
	Demand, savings and
	money market accounts	$	975,788	975,788	888,094	888,094
	Time deposits	$	456,184	461,000	489,603	482,384
	Borrowings	$	8,606	8,960	9,841	9,993
	Junior subordinated debentures	$	51,547	53,204	51,547	53,527


	Other financial instruments:
	Interest rate swap agreement	$	(1,044)	(1,044)	(1,437)	(1,437)
	Letters of credit	$	(161)	(161)	(120)	(120)
(7) Fair Values of Financial Instruments (continued)

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument:

Cash and Equivalents

For these short-term instruments that generally mature 90 days or less, or carry a market rate of interest, the carrying value approximates fair value.

Securities (Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity)

Fair values for securities are determined using independent pricing services and market-participating brokers, or matrix models using observable inputs. The pricing service and brokers use a variety of techniques to arrive at fair value including market maker bids, quotes and pricing models. Inputs to their pricing models include recent trades, benchmark interest rates, spreads, and actual and projected cash flows. Management obtains a single market quote or price estimate for each security. None of the quotes or estimates is considered a binding quote, as management would only request one if management had the positive intent to sell the securities in the foreseeable future and management believed the price quoted represented one from a market participant with the intent and the ability to purchase. Internal matrix models are used for non-traded municipal securities. Matrix models consider observable inputs, such as benchmark interest rates and spreads.

Certain securities’ fair values are determined using unobservable inputs and include bank debt based CDO’s. There is a very limited market and limited demand for these CDO’s due to imbalances in marketplace liquidity and the uncertainty in evaluating the credit risk in these securities. In determining fair value for these securities, management considered various inputs. Management considered fair values from several brokerage firms which were determined using assumptions as to expected cash flows and approximate risk-adjusted discount rates.

Loans

Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by interest type such as floating, adjustable, and fixed-rate loans, and by portfolios such as commercial, mortgage, and consumer.

The fair value of performing loans is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the loans' estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan category. The estimate of maturity is based on the average maturity for each loan classification.

Delinquent loans (not in foreclosure) are valued using the method noted above, and also consider the fair value of collateral, based on 3^rd party appraisals, for collateral-dependent loans. While credit risk is a component of the discount rate used to value loans, delinquent loans are presumed to possess additional risk. Therefore, the calculated fair value of loans is reduced by the allowance for loan losses.

The fair value of loans held for sale is estimated based on outstanding investor commitments or in the absence of such commitments, is based on current yield requirements or quoted market prices.

Loan Servicing Assets

Fair value is determined through estimates provided by a third party. To estimate the fair value, the third party considers market prices for similar assets and the present value of expected future cash flows associated with the servicing assets calculated using assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future servicing income and expense. Such assumptions include estimates of the cost of servicing loans, loan default rates, an appropriate discount rate, and prepayment speeds. The estimated fair value of mortgage servicing rights may vary significantly in subsequent periods due to changing interest rates and the effect thereof on prepayment speeds. The key economic assumptions used to determine the fair value of mortgage servicing rights at June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the sensitivity of such values to changes in those assumptions are summarized in the 2009 Annual Report and are substantially unchanged.

Deposits

The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts, and money market accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed maturity time deposits is estimated using a discounted cash flow approach that applies current market rates to a schedule of aggregated expected maturities of time deposits.

Borrowings

The fair value of borrowings is based on quoted market prices for the identical debt when traded as an asset in an active market. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the borrowings' estimated maturity using current market rates.


(7) Fair Values of Financial Instruments (continued)

Junior Subordinated Debentures

There is no trading market for the Company’s debentures. Therefore the fair value of junior subordinated debentures is determined using an expected present value technique. The fair value of the adjustable-rate debentures approximates their face amount, while the fair value of fixed-rate debentures is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the borrowings' estimated maturity using current market rates.

Interest Rate Swap Agreement (Swap)

The fair value of the swap was the amount the Company would have expected to pay to terminate the agreement and was based upon the present value of expected future cash flows using the LIBOR swap curve, the basis for the underlying interest rate.

Other Financial Instruments

The fair values of letters of credit and unused lines of credit approximate the fee charged to make the commitments.

(8) Fair Values Measurements

Some of the financial instruments disclosed in the previous note are measured at fair value in the condensed consolidated financial statements. Accounting principles establish a three-level valuation hierarchy for fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are defined as follows.

	•	Level 1 – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
	•	Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
	•	Level 3 – inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

The following table presents for each of the fair-value hierarchy levels the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis at June 30, 2010, by caption on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet (dollars in thousands).


		Internal models	Internal models
	Quoted market	with significant	with significant	Total carrying
	prices in active	observable market	unobservable market	value in the
	markets	parameters	parameters	Consolidated
	(Level 1)	(Level 2)	(Level 3)	Balance Sheet
Measured on a recurring basis:
Assets
Securities available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury	$ 502	-	-	502
U.S. government sponsored
enterprise obligations	-	40,965	-	40,965
State and municipal obligation	-	73,378	-	73,378
All other	-	1,385	995	2,380
Total assets	$ 502	115,728	995	117,225

Liabilities
Interest rate swap agreement	$ -	1,044		1,044
Letters of credit	-	161		161
Total liabilities	$ -	1,205		1,205

Measured on a non-recurring basis:
Assets
Loans
Loans-held-for-sale	$ -	16,715	-	16,715
Collateral dependent impaired loans	-	-	3,370	3,370
Other assets
Other real estate owned	-	-	3,808	3,808
Loan servicing assets	-	-	1,911	1,911
Total assets	$ -	16,715	9,089	25,804

(8) Fair Values Measurements (continued)

The following table shows a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 (in thousands).


		Three months ended	Six months ended
		June 30, 2010	June 30, 2010
Securities available for sale, beginning of period	$	1,004	$	972
Unrealized gain (loss) included in other comprehensive income		(9)		23
Securities available for sale, end of period	$	995	$	995

The following table presents for each of the fair-value hierarchy levels the Company’s assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2009, by caption on the Consolidated Balance Sheet (dollars in thousands).


		Internal models	Internal models
	Quoted market	with significant	with significant	Total carrying
	prices in active	observable market	unobservable market	value in the
	markets	parameters	parameters	Consolidated
	(Level 1)	(Level 2)	(Level 3)	Balance Sheet
Measured on a recurring basis:
Assets
Securities available-for-sale:	$ -	102,269	814	103,083
Total assets	$ -	102,269	814	103,083

Liabilities
Interest rate swap agreement	$ -	1,617	-	1,617
Letters of credit	-	162	-	162
Total liabilities	$ -	1,779	-	1,779

Measured on a non-recurring basis:
Assets
Loans
Loans-held-for-sale	$ -	10,043	-	10,043
Collateral dependent impaired loans	-	-	8,822	8,822
Other assets
Other real estate owned	-	-	3,368	3,368
Loan servicing assets	-	-	2,134	2,134
Total assets	$ -	10,043	14,324	24,367

(9) Securities

Amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities at June 30, 2010 are summarized as follows:


		June 30, 2010

			Gross Unrealized
		Amortized			Fair
		Cost	Gains	Losses	Value

Securities Available for Sale:
U. S. Treasury	$	502	-	-	502
Government sponsored enterprise obligations		40,547	418	-	40,965
State and municipal obligations		70,487	2,911	(20)	73,378
Corporate obligations⁽¹⁾		1,229	-	(234)	995
Equity securities		1,292	93	-	1,385

Total securities Available for Sale	$	114,057	3,422	(254)	117,225

⁽¹⁾ Amortized cost includes a $820,000 write-down for other-than-temporary impairment prior to January 1, 2010.

Securities Held to Maturity:
Government sponsored enterprise obligations	$	10,003	60	(9)	10,054
State and municipal obligations		144,520	6,308	(51)	150,777
Corporate obligations		860	144	-	1,004

Total securities Held to Maturity	$	155,383	6,512	(60)	161,835

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities by years to maturity as of June 30, 2010, follow (in thousands). Maturities of amortizing securities are classified in accordance with the contractual repayment schedules. Expected maturities will differ from contracted maturities since issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations without penalties.


		Available for Sale		Held to Maturity
		Amortized Cost⁽¹⁾	Fair Value	Amortized Cost	Fair Value
Years
Under 1	$	14,544	14,782	27,359	27,775
1 to 5		55,729	58,145	107,529	112,871
5 to 10		39,299	39,906	19,027	19,597
10 and over		3,193	3,007	1,468	1,592

Total	$	112,765	115,840	155,383	161,835

⁽¹⁾ Amortized cost includes a $820,000 write-down for other-than-temporary impairment prior to January 1, 2010.

The following table presents gross unrealized losses and fair value of available-for-sale investments aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2010.


June 30, 2010		Less than 12 months		Over 12 months		Total
		Fair	Unrealized	Fair	Unrealized	Fair	Unrealized
Securities Available for Sale		Value	Losses	Value	Losses	Value	Losses
State and municipal obligations	$	-	-	2,388	20	2,388	20
Corporate obligations		-	-	1,049	234	1,049	234

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	-	-	3,437	254	3,437	254

Securities Held to Maturity
Government sponsored enterprise obligations	$	1,999	8	10	1	2,009	9
State and municipal obligations		-	-	4,269	51	4,269	51

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	1,999	8	4,279	52	6,278	60

(9) Securities (continued)

Substantially all of the unrealized losses on the Company's securities were caused by market interest rate changes from those in effect when the securities were purchased by the Company. With the exception of certain corporate obligations, discussed below, the contractual terms of these securities do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than par value. Except for certain corporate obligations, all securities rated by an independent rating agency carry an investment grade rating. Because the Company does not intend to sell the securities and it believes it is not likely to be required to sell the securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be, and is likely to be, maturity, the Company does not consider these securities to be other than temporarily impaired at June 30, 2010, except as discussed below.

In the available-for-sale portfolio, the Company holds approximately $1.0 million of bank trust-preferred securities with an adjusted cost basis of $1.2 million. These securities are backed by debt obligations of banks, with about $0.7 million of the securities backed by two of the largest U.S. banks and $0.3 million backed by a pool of banks’ debt in the form of a collateralized debt obligation (CDO). As a result of market upheaval, a lack of regular trading market in these securities, and bank failures, the fair value of these securities had fallen sharply in 2008 and continued to fall in the first half of 2009. Until the second quarter of 2009, there had been no reduction in cash receipts (interest) on these securities; that is, they were current as to principal and interest. However, the collateral underlying one CDO had diminished due to debt defaults and interest deferrals of some of the banks, and beginning in the June 2009 quarter, a portion of interest payments due had been deferred. Management analyzed the expected underlying cash flows and the ability of the collateral to produce sufficient cash flows to support future principal and interest payments. Management’s analysis indicated these cash flows would be insufficient, and accordingly, the Company recognized other-than-temporary-impairment (OTTI) and wrote down this CDO by $0.7 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2008. An additional OTTI write-down of $0.1 million was taken in the quarter ended June 30, 2009. Because all of the impairment was deemed to be credit related, the entire write-down had been charged to income with none charged to other comprehensive income. Management intends to sell this security, as such, if the financial condition of the underlying banks continues to deteriorate, further write-downs could occur before a sale. The maximum potential write-down would be its current carrying value of less than $0.2 million.

Amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities at December 31, 2009 are summarized as follows:


		December 31, 2009

			Gross Unrealized
		Amortized			Fair
		Cost	Gains	Losses	Value

Securities Available for Sale:
U.S. Treasury	$	502	-	(2)	500
U.S. government sponsored enterprise obligations		35,473	192	(382)	35,283
State and municipal obligations		77,742	3,126	(52)	80,816
Corporate obligations⁽¹⁾		1,227	-	(255)	972
Equity securities		1,322	32	-	1,354

Total securities Available for Sale	$	116,266	3,350	(691)	118,925

⁽¹⁾Amortized cost includes a $820,000 write-down for other-than-temporary impairment prior to January 1, 2010.

Securities Held to Maturity:
U.S. government sponsored agencies obligations	$	1,015	4	-	1,019
State and municipal obligations		157,414	6,673	(75)	164,012
Corporate obligations		754	128	-	882

Total securities Held to Maturity	$	159,183	6,805	(75)	165,913

(9) Securities (continued)

The following table presents the fair value of securities with gross unrealized losses at December 31, 2009, excluding those for which other-than-temporary-impairment charges have been taken, aggregated by category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position.


		Less than 12 months		Over 12 months		Total
		Fair	Unrealized	Fair	Unrealized	Fair	Unrealized
Securities Available for Sale		Value	Losses	Value	Losses	Value	Losses
U.S. Treasury	$	500	2	-	-	500	2
U.S. government sponsored enterprise obligations		20,592	382	-	-	20,592	382
State and municipal obligations		4,586	52	-	-	4,586	52
Corporate obligations		-	-	792	255	792	255

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	25,678	436	792	255	26,470	691

Securities Held to Maturity
State and municipal obligations	$	5,675	63	1,808	12	7,483	75

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	31,353	499	2,600	267	33,953	766


(10) Accounting Pronouncements Implemented in the Current Year

	We implemented the following Accounting Standards Updates (ASU) as of January 1, 2010 with no impact to our financial condition or results of operations. In some instances, expanded disclosures were implemented:

	ASU 2009-16, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets. ASU 2009-16 amends the guidance in Topic 860-10, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. It eliminates the QSPE concept, creates more stringent conditions for reporting a transfer of a portion of a financial asset as a sale, clarifies the derecognition criteria, revises how retained interests are initially measured, and removes the guaranteed mortgage securitization recharacterization provisions.

	ASU 2009-17, Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities. ASU 2009-17 amends the guidance related to the consolidation of variable interest entities (VIE). It requires reporting entities to evaluate former Qualifying Special Purpose Entities (QSPEs) for consolidation, changes the approach to determining a VIE’s primary beneficiary from a quantitative assessment to a qualitative assessment designed to identify a controlling financial interest, and increases the frequency of required reassessments to determine whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. It also clarifies, but does not significantly change, the characteristics that identify a VIE.
	ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820). ASU 2010-06 was issued in January 2010. Subtopic 820-10 has been amended to require new disclosures: (a) transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 should be disclosed separately including a description of the reasons for the transfers, and (b) activity in Level 3 fair value measurements shall be reported on a gross basis, including information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements. The amendments also clarify existing disclosures relating to disaggregated reporting, model inputs, and valuation techniques. The new disclosures were effective for us in the first quarter of 2010, except for the gross reporting of Level 3 activity which is effective beginning in the first quarter of 2011.

	ASU 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855). This ASU amends FASB ASC Topic 855, Subsequent Events (originally issued as FASB Statement No. 165, Subsequent Events), so that SEC filers, as defined in the ASU, no longer are required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in originally issued and revised financial statements. Entities that are not SEC filers must continue to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated, including situations in which the financial statements are revised for a correction of an error or retrospective application of U.S. GAAP. The Company is an SEC filer.


Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following is our discussion and analysis of certain significant factors which have affected the Company's financial position and operating results during the periods included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. This discussion and analysis supplements our Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Critical Accounting Estimate

We are instructed, pursuant to SEC guidance, to evaluate and disclose those accounting estimates that we judge to be critical - those most important to the portrayal of the Company's financial condition and results, and that require our most difficult, subjective and complex judgments. We consider the Allowance for Loan Losses (allowance) as critical given the inherent uncertainty in evaluating the levels of the allowance required to reflect credit losses in the portfolio. We also consider the valuation of investment securities for Other-Than-Temporary-Impairment (OTTI) as critical in the current market environment given the lack of an active and liquid market for a small number of our holdings. There has been no change in our methodology for estimating the allowance or securities’ valuation, which is fully described within the 2009 Annual Report.

Financial Overview

Diluted earnings per common share for the second quarter of 2010 rose 81% to $11.19 from $6.18 in the same quarter of 2009 and were 52.3% higher than $7.35 in the first quarter of 2010. Net income in the current quarter was $5.4 million, up from $3.0 million and $3.5 million in the second quarter of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010, respectively..

The recent quarter’s earnings as compared with the second quarter of 2009 reflected a significant rise in net interest income, resulting from a widening of the net interest margin and significantly lower provision for credit losses due to improving credit quality. Also contributing to the improved performance as compared with the year-earlier quarter were lower insurance assessments by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the impact of the $0.8 retirement expense accrual and $0.1 million securities write-down in 2009.

The current quarter’s balance sheet growth occurred in the loan portfolio, funded mostly by balances in Federal Funds Sold, and to a lesser extent, deposit growth. All other interest-earning assets—Federal Funds Sold and investments—declined. Off-balance sheet, both the book value and market value of Assets under Administration declined, reflecting a deteriorating stock market and to a lesser extent, customer account attrition.

For the coming quarter we expect modest growth in the loan portfolio as well as in retail and commercial deposits. We expect operating results to remain strong due to continued revenue growth, and our expectation of stable credit conditions should lead to a moderate provision for loan losses.

Impact of Financial Regulation Legislation

On July 21, 2010, the President signed into law The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Financial Reform Act”). The Financial Reform Act significantly alters financial regulation in the United States by creating new regulators, regulating new markets, bringing new firms into the regulatory arena, and providing new rulemaking and enforcement powers to regulators. The Financial Reform Act is intended to address specific issues that contributed to the financial crisis and is heavily remedial in nature. Many of the provisions in the Act are applicable to very large institutions (greater than $10 billion in assets). A summary of the Financial Reform Act’s provisions that may potentially impact or have impact on the Company is presented in the section entitled Legislative and Fiscal Matters below.

Financial Condition (three months ended June 30, 2010)

At June 30, 2010, total assets were $1,624.0 million, up $10.9 million or 0.7% from $1,613.1 million at March 31, 2010.

Cash and cash equivalents (cash, balances with other financial institutions, and federal funds sold) were $113.5 million, falling $21.2 million having been used to fund loan growth.

The securities portfolio fell $4.5 million or 1.6% from March 2010. Much like we saw in the first quarter of 2010, the second quarter of 2010 saw an increase in securities called, in addition to scheduled maturities (i.e., issuers repaid debt obligations before their stated maturities). The continuing low interest rate environment has made it beneficial for issuers to call outstanding higher cost debt and replace with lower cost debt. Conversely, with these investments called, we are finding fewer investments with attractive terms (rate, maturity, credit quality) in which to invest. Accordingly, we purchased fewer investments in the quarter,and the uninvested funds were held in Federal Funds Sold or used to fund loan growth. During the third quarter of 2010 we expect more securities to be called, but we cannot accurately predict the volume. We expect to reinvest some funds into new investments, but the portfolio’s total size could shrink further if attractive opportunities are not available.

The securities portfolio consists principally of New York State municipality obligations (82.2% of total at June 30, 2010) with the remainder mostly in US Treasury and government sponsored enterprise obligations. The total fair value of both the available-for-sale and the held-to-maturity securities portfolios exceeded amortized cost as a result of a decrease in mid- and long-term market rates since the securities’ purchase. In both portfolios we hold some securities with fair values below their amortized cost and concluded there are none considered to be other than temporarily impaired as of June 30, 2010.

Gross loans increased $37.2 million to $1,188.0 from $1,150.8 million. The commercial portfolios increased $13.2 million due to higher originations, principally in commercial mortgages. The residential loan portfolios increased $10.2 million reflecting the continuing mortgage refinances and higher home purchases due to the existing home buyer’s tax credit which expired in this quarter. The consumer loan portfolios increased $4.7 million for the quarter principally due to higher originations of indirect automobile loans. In the coming quarter we expect all portfolios to grow with consumer originations similar to those experienced in this quarter and commercial originations somewhat less than those experienced in this quarter. Also, we expect mortgage originations to decline with the end of the federal housing tax credit. Please see the section entitled “Impaired Loans and Non-Performing Assets” for a discussion of credit quality.

Total deposits at June 30, 2010, were $1,432.0 million and were up $4.3 million from March 31, 2010. Growth occurred in non-interest bearing and lower cost interest bearing accounts, principally driven by retail customers. Similar to last quarter, we experienced a decline in time deposits principally driven by retail customers, who shifted maturing time deposit funds to lower cost interest bearing accounts. Next quarter we expect both retail and commercial customer account growth mostly in demand, savings and money market accounts. We expect municipal deposits, which declined $25.0 million this quarter consistent with seasonal fluctuations, to remain steady or possibly decline further depending upon New York State’s fiscal position.

Total borrowings remained unchanged. They will fall $8.1 million in the coming quarter due to scheduled maturities. We do not expect to incur new long-term borrowings or need to access overnight borrowings for the remainder of the year, because the strength of deposit inflows should be sufficient to fund the increases we expect in earning assets.

Results of Operations (three months ended June 30, 2010)

Net interest income increased $2.2 million or 16.8% for the quarter over the same quarter in 2009, reflecting the positive impact of the balance sheet's year-over-year growth and a widening interest rate margin and spread. With general interest rates remaining low we have seen both asset yields and liability costs fall as maturing products are replaced at lower interest rates. Given the general steepness of the yield curve, this downward pricing is impacting deposit costs more favorably than asset yields, thus widening our interest rate spread and margin.

On a tax-equivalent basis, compared to the same quarter in 2009, the overall growth in interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities had a $1.0 million positive impact on net interest income, and the change in rates had a $1.2 million positive impact. Net interest margin was 4.33% for the second quarter of 2010, up from 3.97% during the same quarter in 2009. As we discussed in our 2009 Annual Report, we expect net interest income to increase for the year due to our balance sheet growth, but we had expected little positive impact from rate changes given the interest rate environment and our anticipation of a higher rate environment towards the second half of the year. In actuality, the interest rate environment has fallen during the first half of the year, including this most recent quarter, resulting in declining interest costs. Summary tax-equivalent net interest income information for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 follows (dollars in thousands).


		2010				2009
			Annualized				Annualized
	Average		Average		Average		Average
	Balance	Interest	Rate		Balance	Interest	Rate


Interest-earning assets	$ 1,506,323	20,103	5.34	%	1,423,423	19,427	5.46	%
Non interest –earning assets	104,729				89,814
Total assets	$ 1,611,052				1,513,237

Total interest-bearing liabilities	1,296,062	3,792	1.17	%	1,227,009	5,310	1.73	%
Non-interest bearing liabilities	200,044				183,548
Equity	114,946				102,680
Total liabilities and equity	$ 1,611,052				1,513,237

Interest rate spread			4.17	%			3.73	%
Net interest margin		$16,311	4.33	%		14,117	3.97	%

The provision for loan losses was $0.5 million for the quarter, about half as much as the same quarter last year. The lower provision in the 2010 quarter was mostly driven by improvements in asset quality indicators (past-due and nonaccrual loans, impaired loans, current and historical net-charge-offs) compared to the same period last year, offset by loan portfolio growth. A summary of the allowance for loan losses and net charge-offs for the year to date is presented in a following section.

Total other income for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 increased 3.3% to $6.5 million from $6.3 million in 2009. Service charges on deposit accounts increased 30.3% reflecting customer usage of our Courtesy Limit product launched in the last quarter of 2009. Account maintenance service charges (included in service charges) were up slightly year-on year reflecting growth in new accounts. Also included in the same line item, debit and ATM card revenues continued to increase with consumers shifting from cash and checks to electronic transactions. As noted in previous reports, service charge revenues in the second half of the year may be substantially lower than the first half due to the impact of recent federal regulations limiting financial institutions’ sales of overdraft protection products. Our cross-functional team of employees has modified our product offering consistent with these new regulations, and they are communicating to affected customers. Additionally, the Financial Reform Act, discussed above, may negatively impact our debit card income depending upon final industry analyses and regulations by the Federal Reserve.

Trust and investment services income increased $0.3 million or 11.6% for the quarter compared to last year. Total assets under administration (see table below) have grown markedly year on year due to both organic growth in underlying accounts and higher market value of assets within the accounts resulting from improved equity and bond markets. However, the stock market’s poor performance in the second quarter of 2010 more than offset the market value gains realized from the strong performance in the first quarter of 2010. We anticipate organic and market value growth to continue into the coming quarters, but year-over-year growth rates should be less than 10%.

Assets Under Administration

as of

(in thousands)


	June 30,	March 31,	December 31,	June 30,
	2010	2010	2009	2009

Cost basis of assets under administration	$ 1,591,411	1,599,944	1,591,943	1,561,425

Fair value of assets under administration	$ 1,607,528	1,706,409	1,651,777	1,470,444

With the rapid fall in mortgage interest rates during 2009 we saw the largest refinance boom in over five years. By the end of 2009, rates had settled and slightly increased into 2010. This increase in rates led to a lower volume of refinance loans in 2010 compared to 2009. On the other hand, the federal government’s The Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009’s extension of the tax credit to April 2010 led to higher demand for purchase money mortgages. Our total closings for the quarter fell nearly 40% compared to the same quarter in 2009 due to a lower volume of refinance loans, offset partially by a higher volume of purchase money mortgages. Corresponding with this decline in volume, the net gain on loans sold fell nearly 60% when compared to 2009. We expect closings in the coming quarter to be less than this quarter’s due to the expiration of the tax credit. However, as the second quarter of 2010 drew to a close, mortgage rates were declining to historically low levels And it is possible there will be another wave of heavy refinance activity.

CNB Mortgage Closed Loans by Type
For the three-month periods ended June 30,
(dollars in thousands)


		2010		2009
Purchase money mortgages	$	53,977		29,543
Refinance mortgages		13,839		81,136
Total mortgage originations	$	67,816		110,679

Percentage of loans retained in portfolio		10.3	%	12.3	%

Operating expenses fell 1.0% or $0.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same three-month period in 2009. Included in 2009’s quarter was approximately, $1.5 million due to two non-standard expense accruals – a one-time FDIC premium charge of $0.7 million and retirement expense accrual of $0.8 million. Excluding these items, operating expenses would have shown a 10.9% increase, reflective of our franchise growth.

Excluding 2009’s retirement expense accrual, salaries and benefits increased about 5.0% reflecting a higher headcount, incumbent salary increases, and higher benefit costs. Occupancy costs have increased with the addition of new offices including our newest banking office at Alexander Park in the City of Rochester, New York, and repair costs for existing offices. Marketing and public relations expenses have increased due to promotional activities in Sarasota, Florida, and a higher level of charitable contributions to not-for-profit agencies in our communities. Professional and other services increased $0.4 million for the quarter directly related to the final payment to consultants for work on profitability enhancement for specific products. FDIC insurance premiums were lower year-on-year as discussed above. For the third quarter of 2010 we expect to see similar growth rates for all categories as in this quarter except FDIC insurance expense which should be comparatively higher due to generally higher assessments in 2010 and a higher amount of assessable deposits.

The quarterly effective tax rate was 26.2% in 2010 and 22.4% in 2009. The change in the effective rate is attributable to the ratio of tax-exempt income to total income.


	*Financial Condition and Results of Operations (six months ended June 30, 2010)*

At June 30, 2010, total assets of the Company were up $58.0 million or 3.7% from December 31, 2009. Cash and equivalents (cash, balances and federal funds sold) increased as a result of securities’ maturities and net deposit growth exceeding net loan originations. Securities fell $5.5 million as we chose to purchase fewer investments at current low long-term rates so as to better manage for an eventual increasing interest rate environment. Loans grew $28.1 million or 2.4%. Total deposits at June 30, 2010, were up 3.9% with growth mostly in consumer and commercial deposits.

Net interest income improved 14.5% for the six-month period in 2010 from the same period in 2009. The increase in net interest margin was caused by rates on interest-bearing liabilities falling faster than yields on interest-earning assets combined with growth in the average balance of these liabilities and assets. Summary tax-equivalent net interest income information for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 follows:


		2010				2009
			Annualized				Annualized
	Average		Average		Average		Average
	Balance	Interest	Rate		Balance	Interest	Rate


Interest-earning assets	$ 1,494,821	39,599	5.30	%	1,401,762	38,964	5.56	%
Non interest –earning assets	105,215				87,408
Total assets	$ 1,600,036				1,489,170

Total interest-bearing liabilities	1,303,293	7,837	1.20	%	1,206,428	10,993	1.82	%
Non-interest bearing liabilities	183,590				181,345
Equity	113,153				101,397
Total liabilities and equity	$ 1,600,036				1,489,170

Interest rate spread			4.10	%			3.74	%
Net interest margin		$31,762	4.25	%		27,971	3.99	%

Other income for the six months ended June 30, 2010, increased 9.0% to $12.9 million from $11.8 million in 2009. The same factors impacting the three-month period impacted the six month period results.

Mortgage originations fell 68.5% for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 versus the same period in 2009 due to the end of the mortgage refinance boom last year, somewhat offset by increased originations of purchase money mortgages. Along with the overall decrease in volume was the reduction in net gain on the sale of mortgage loans. A summary of originations follows (dollars in thousands):

CNB Mortgage Closed Loans by Type

For the six-month periods ended June 30,

(dollars in thousands).


		2010		2009
Purchase money mortgages	$	77,512		48,093
Refinance mortgages		36,142		136,589
Total mortgage originations	$	113,654		184,682

Percentage of loans retained in portfolio		25.6	%	12.0	%

Operating expenses increased 3.7% or $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, over the same period in 2009. Excluding the one-time items in the second quarter of 2009 totaling $1.5 million, operating expenses increased 9.9% reflecting our franchise growth.

The Company's effective tax rate for the year to date in 2010 increased to 26.2% from 24.0% in 2009. The change in the effective rate is attributable to the ratio of tax-exempt income to total income.

Liquidity

There has been no material change from December 31, 2009 in our available sources of wholesale liquidity from either the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (FHLB) or the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

For the six months ended June 30, 2010, cash flows from all activities provided $35.2 million in net cash and cash equivalents versus $77.9 million for the same period in 2009. In both years the principal source of cash inflows was deposits.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $3.2 million in 2010 versus $2.8 million in 2009. Both the largest source and use of operating cash in 2010 and 2009 were loans held for sale with activity in 2010 less than half that of 2009. Excluding the effect of loans held for sale, operating activities provided $13.3 million cash for the six-month period in 2010 and $10.8 million in 2009.

For the first half of 2010, investing activities used $19.0 million in cash and equivalents and used $27.3 million in 2009. Major investing activities in both periods occurred in the loan portfolio.

Cash provided by financing activities was $51.0 million in 2010 versus $102.4 million in 2009. The main contributor in both years was deposit activity with 2010’s a little more than half of 2009’s.

For the remainder of 2010, cash for growth is expected to come primarily from operating activities and customer deposits. Customer deposit growth is mainly expected to come from Monroe County retail sources and Ontario County municipalities.

Contractual obligations and commitments

Less material, but a part of our ongoing operations, and expected to be funded through normal operations, are liquidity uses such as lease obligations, long-term debt repayments, and other funding commitments. There has been no material change from the information disclosed in our 2009 Annual Report.

Also, as discussed more fully in our 2009 Annual Report, in the normal course of business, various commitments and contingent liabilities are outstanding. Because many commitments and almost all letters of credit expire without being funded in whole or in part, the notional amounts are not estimates of future cash flows. The following table presents the notional amount of the Company's significant commitments. Most of these commitments are not included in the Company's consolidated balance sheet (in thousands).


	June 30, 2010		December 31, 2009

		Notional		Notional
		Amount		Amount
Commitments to extend credit:
Commercial lines of credit	$	106,434		104,423
Commercial real estate and construction	$	20,185		23,069
Residential real estate at fixed rates	$	15,573		5,824
Home equity lines of credit	$	134,015		113,982
Unsecured personal lines of credit	$	15,988		15,937
Standby and commercial letters of credit	$	10,749		8,298
Commitments to sell real estate loans	$	16,715		6,657

Capital Resources

Under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, as of June 30, 2010, the Company and Bank are categorized as "well-capitalized." This is unchanged from December 31, 2009, and management anticipates no change in this classification for the foreseeable future

Credit-Related Information

Allowance for Loan Losses and Net Charge-offs

Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, and 2009 follow (dollars in thousands):


		June 30,
		2010		2009
Balance at beginning of period	$	14,232		11,992
Provision for loan losses		2,950		2,555
Loans charged off		(2,930)		(1,137)
Recoveries on loans previously charged off		659		298
Balance at end of period	$	14,911		13,708

Allowance as a percentage of total period end loans		1.26	%	1.23	%

Allowance as a percentage of non-performing loans		67.6	%	78.1	%

Net charge-offs to average loans (annualized)		0.39	%	0.15	%

The provision for loan losses for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 was higher than the same period in 2009 as discussed in the Results of Operations. The balance in the allowance and the provision for loan losses have increased with growth in the total loan portfolio and negative changes in asset quality compared to 2009. As discussed more fully in the Annual Report, we determine the amount necessary in the allowance for loan losses based upon a number of factors. Based on our current assessment of the loan portfolio, we believe the amount of the allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2010, is adequate at $14.9 million. However, should this year’s trend of generally higher non-performing and non-accrual loans continue, or should we experience further declines in customers’ credit quality measured through loan impairment or internal loan classifications, we may need a higher allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans. This would necessitate an increase to the provision for loan losses.

Net charge-offs to average loans increased in the first half of 2010 to 39 basis points compared to 15 basis points in 2009. This is a historically high net charge-off rate for us and was driven by a large charge-off of one impaired commercial loan with an impaired reserve and a number of smaller consumer loans in the first quarter of 2010. Net charge-offs in the second quarter of 2010 were $0.1 million compared to $2.2 million in the first quarter of 2010. In the coming quarter, we do not expect a continuation of either the very low net charge-off rate of the second quarter nor the very high rate of the first quarter. We anticipate a return to annualized net charge-offs in the 25-35 basis points range.

Non-Performing Assets and Impaired Loans


Non-Performing Assets
Non-Performing Assets
(Dollars in thousands)


		June 30,		March 31,		December 31,		June 30,
		2010		2010		2009		2009
Loans past due 90 days or more and accruing:
Commercial and industrial	$	196		202		422		151
Real estate-commercial		191		369		-		342
Real estate-residential		24		407		290		624
Consumer and other		472		107		375		139
Total past due 90 days or more and accruing		883		1,085		1,087		1,256

Loans in non-accrual status:
Commercial and industrial		9,245		8,850		10,282		12,099
Real estate-commercial		10,651		12,497		5,656		2,999
Real estate-residential		2,146		2,705		2,609		1,197
Consumer and other		-		-		-		-
Total non-accrual loans		22,042		24,052		18,547		16,295
Total non-performing loans		22,925		25,137		19,634		17,551

Other real estate owned
Commercial		529		547		603		639
Residential		3,279		2,069		2,166		2,729
Total other real estate owned		3,808		2,616		2,769		3,368

Total non-performing assets	$	26,733		27,753		22,403		20,919

Restructured commercial real-estate
debt (included non-accrual loans)	$	4,805		None		None		None


Non-performing loans to total period-end loans		1.94	%	2.19	%	1.70	%	1.58	%
Non-performing assets to total period-end
loans and other real estate		2.25	%	2.42	%	1.94	%	1.88	%

Total non-performing loans decreased $2.2 million to $22.9 million at June 30, 2010 from $25.1 million at March 31, 2010 having previously increased $5.5 million from $19.6 million at December 31, 2009. The general increase in non-performing loans during the year has come mainly in real estate secured commercial loans and was principally due to a large commercial relationship discussed in the Annual Report. The loans underlying these relationships are considered impaired, but are sufficiently collateralized such that no impairment reserve is necessary.

Though a comparatively modest amount, other real-estate owned has also increased during the year.Given the current economic climate and fragile recovery, and overall growth in non-performing loans, we can expect additional foreclosures in the coming periods.

The percentage of non-performing loans to total loans has risen substantially over the last twelve months, but showed some decline in this most recent quarter. While this increase is large, it is consistent with the peak percentage reached by the Company in the last recession earlier in the decade of 1.93%.

In the process of resolving nonperforming loans, we may choose to restructure the contractual terms of certain loans and attempt to work out alternative payment schedules with the borrower in order to avoid foreclosure of collateral. Any loans that are modified are evaluated to determine if they are "troubled debt restructurings (TDR)" and if so, are evaluated for impairment. A TDR is defined as a loan restructure where for legal or economic reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, the creditor grants one or more concessions to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. Terms of loan agreements may be modified to fit the ability of the borrower to repay in respect of its current financial status and restructuring of loans may include the transfer of assets from the borrower to satisfy debt, a modification of loan terms, or a combination of the two. If a satisfactory restructure and payment arrangement cannot be reached, the loan may be referred to legal counsel for foreclosure. As of June 30, 2010 there was one lending relationship totaling $4.8 million that is considered a TDR. This is set forth in the Non-Performing Assets table as “restructured commercial real estate debt”

Impaired Loans

Information on impaired loans for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, and 2009 and twelve months ended December 31, 2009, follows (dollars in thousands):


		Six Months		Twelve Months		Six Months
		Ended		Ended		Ended
		June 30,		December 31,		June 30,
		2010		2009		2009

Recorded investment at period end	$	22,231		18,547		16,295
Impaired loans as percent of total loans		1.88	%	1.61	%	1.47	%
Impaired loans with related allowance	$	3,370		7,771		8,822
Related allowance	$	1,267		2,799		3,436
Average investment during period	$	21,610		14,306		11,999
Interest income recognized during period		n/m		n/m		n/m
n/m – not meaningful


As noted in the “Non-Performing Assets” section, we experienced a significant increase in non-performing loans during the period. This increase resulted from a small number of large commercial loans becoming past due on scheduled principal and interest payments. Impaired loans with a related reserve have declined since year end, and reserves for impaired loans declined to $1.3 million at June 30, 2010 versus $2.8 million at December 31, 2009 and $3.4 million at June 30, 2009. The balance of impaired loans with a related reserve declined due to a combination of (1) improved financial position of loans, and (2) charge-offs of loans. These charge-offs also reduced the related allowance. We believe the trend of impaired loans, the level of impaired loans, and the related reserve are consistent with current economic conditions. Typically the longer an economic recession continues the more likely borrowers will experience financial difficulties due to constraints on their income and cash flow. These constraints make it more difficult for them to timely pay their debt obligations, resulting in higher non-accrual and impaired loans for us. We continue to see signs of improving regional economic conditions, but their positive impact will take time to be realized. We can anticipate more loans, though we know of no material ones that will become impaired in the coming quarters. Concurrently, we expect some loans, which are currently impaired, to improve over this same period. Accordingly we do not expect the level of impaired loans to substantially decline during the September 30, 2010 quarter.

At June 30, 2010 we identified a total of 65 loans totaling $22.2 million that were considered impaired. Of these, eight, with a balance outstanding of $3.4 million had specific reserves associated with them amounting to $1.3 million. These reserves are included in the total allowance for loan losses. Accounting for the largest concentration of impaired loans is two relationships (6 loans) totaling $6.3 million associated with two commercial and industrial loans to companies in the food and beverage industry originated between 2005 and 2007 for which we have made specific reserves of $0.7 million. During the first quarter of 2010, we charged-off $1.6 million of these loans, on which we had impairment reserves. These companies market their products throughout the United States. Their businesses have been negatively impacted by the recession, and their operating cash flow has been insufficient to support principal and interest payments on our loans. One relationship (two loans) with no impairment reserves (due to adequate collateralization) totaling $4.9 million is in the recreation business. This is a local company that has been negatively impacted by the recession, experiencing a decline in user revenues.

Our local economy continues to reflect some of the same trends we are seeing in the national and state economies, but our statistics are better than both. As reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics the Rochester region unemployment was about 7.5% in June 2010, down from 8.2% at March 2010, and compared to 8.0% at the end of last year. Since June 2009, the economy has lost roughly 1.3% of non-farm jobs. Overall, employment has retreated from about 541,000 in June 2009 to about 534,000 this year. Business conditions are also comparatively slow in the region, again, reflecting the recession. However, recent reports from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York indicate manufacturing conditions are improving and the six month forward outlook is positive. These unemployment and other economic trends have impacted our allowance calculation by increasing the dollar amount of reserve we’ve allocated for economic condition factors.
	Legislative and Fiscal Matters

	The Financial Reform Act created the Financial Stability Oversight Council with its primary obligation to identify, monitor, and assist in the management of systemic risk that may pose a threat to the country’s financial system. Included in its responsibilities is a requirement to review and at its option submit comments, as appropriate to any standard-setting body (such as FASB) with respect to existing or proposed accounting principles, standards or procedures. Though this responsibility may not directly impact the Company, the Council’s review and commentary on accounting matters may result in more consideration by standard-setters of the volatility created by some of its current and proposed standards. We hope the Council’s activities will bring restraint to standard setters and temper current proposals such as mark-to-market accounting for all financial instruments.

	The Act permanently implemented FDIC insurance coverage for all deposit accounts up to $250,000. Furthermore the insurance premium assessment base is revised from all domestic deposits to the average of total assets less tangible equity. The minimum reserve ratio of the deposit insurance fund is increased from 1.15% to 1.35% with the increase to be covered by assessments on insured institutions with assets over $10 billion until the new reserve ratio is reached. We believe the change in the assessment base calculation may result in a reduced premium charge for the company from its current charge, but may not result in a lower expense amount since the Company continues to grow its asset base and the FDIC is required to grow its reserves which have been depleted during this recession.

	The Act creates The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). It will have an independent budget and be housed in the Federal Reserve Board, but not subject to its jurisdiction. The CFPB has rulemaking authority to promulgate regulations regarding consumer financial products and services offered by all banks and thrifts, their affiliates and many non-bank financial services firms. We cannot determine what the impact the CFPB’s rules and regulations might have on the Company, its product offerings, its customers’ ability to purchase products to meet their specific needs, or the Company’s general business practices, but they are likely to be significant given the CFPB’s broad powers.

	The so-called “Durbin Amendment” requires the Federal Reserve Board to adopt regulations limiting interchange fees that can be charged in an electronic debit card transaction to the “reasonable and proportionate” costs related to the incremental cost of the transaction. Banks under $10 billion in assets are exempt, which would include the Company. However, the Company contracts with large debit card processors with which we have relatively weak bargaining power. It is possible these processors, as a result of the Act will earn lower revenues, leaving less revenue per transaction for the Company. The Federal Reserve Board has until July 2011 to complete its regulations, so the timing and extent of impact to the Company is unknown.

	The Act has changed the prudential regulation of our Company whereby both the Bank and its holding company will be regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), because the Company has less than $50 billion in assets. Formerly the Bank was regulated by the OCC and the holding company was regulated by the Federal Reserve Board.

	The Act significantly changes the regulatory structure of the mortgage lending business, but, in effect, has codified the prudent and customer-focused activities the Company has always pursued. For example, the Act provides that a creditor must make a reasonable and good faith determination of a consumer’s ability to repay before making a residential mortgage loan. The determination must be based on verified and documented information and must take into account all applicable taxes, insurance and assessments.

	On the other hand, the Act does add substantial burdens to the Company by, subject to certain exemptions, requiring the establishment of an escrow account in connection with a closed-end consumer credit transaction secured by a first lien on a consumer’s principal dwelling for the payment of taxes and hazard insurance and, if applicable, flood insurance, mortgage insurance, ground rents and any other required periodic payments or premiums with respect to the property or the loan terms. The Company has not historically escrowed such payments. We provided financial advice and a savings product for customers to self-escrow, believing customers were best stewards and managers of their cash flow sources and uses, and government was ill-suited to dictate how much and when consumers should save to meet their financial obligations.

	The Act also modifies the calculation for a loan to be subject to “high-cost-loan” status under the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA) by requiring the Annual Percentage Rate (APR) to be compared to the average prime offer rate for a comparable transaction and not the rate on U.S. Treasury securities having a comparable maturity. The points and fees trigger is lowered, and a prepayment fee trigger is added. We are analyzing how this modification will impact the pricing of our portfolio first and second mortgages.

Recent Accounting Standards to be implemented in Future Periods

ASU No. 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815).This ASU clarifies that embedded credit-derivative features related only to the transfer of credit risk in the form of subordination of one financial instrument to another are not subject to potential bifurcation and separate accounting. Other embedded credit-derivative features are required to be analyzed to determine whether they must be accounted for separately. The ASU provides guidance about whether embedded credit-derivative features in financial instruments issued by structures such as collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and synthetic CDOs are subject to bifurcation and separate accounting. This ASU is effective for the Company on July 1, 2010. Considering the Company’s financial instruments, the implementation of this standard had no impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

ASU No. 2010-18, Effect of a Loan Modification When The Loan Is Part of a Pool That Is Accounted for as a Single Asset, a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (Issue No. 09-I) (Topic 310). This ASU amends FASB ASC Subtopic 310-30, Receivables – Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality, so that modifications of loans that are accounted for within a pool under that Subtopic do not result in the removal of the loans from the pool even if the modifications of the loans would otherwise be considered a troubled debt restructuring. A one-time election to terminate accounting for loans in a pool, which may be made on a pool-by-pool basis, is provided upon adoption of the new guidance. An entity will continue to be required to consider whether the pool of assets in which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change. The amendments in this ASU are effective prospectively for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010. Early adoption was permitted. The Company adopted this amendment in July 2010. However, since it has no relevant circumstances, the implementation of this standard had no impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

ASU 2010-20, Disclosures about Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses, which amends FASB ASC 310 Receivables. In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20 which requires an entity to provide a greater level of disaggregated information about the credit quality of its financing receivables and its allowance for credit losses. The requirements are intended to enhance transparency regarding credit losses and the credit quality of loan and lease receivables. Under this standard, allowance for credit losses and fair value are to be disclosed by portfolio segment, while credit quality information, impaired financing receivables and nonaccrual status are to be presented by class of financing receivable. Disclosure of the nature and extent, the financial impact and segment information of troubled debt restructurings will also be required. These new disclosure requirements are effective for the Company in its December 31, 2010 financial statements. We do not believe the adoption of the standard will not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


	Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

	Interest Rate Sensitivity and Asset / Liability Management Review

As set forth in our 2009 Annual Report, we predicted market interest rates for 2010 would remain fairly steady for most of the year at current historic lows with an increase in the second half of the year. Given recent economic, fiscal, and monetary reports, including a review of the Federal Open Market Committee’s minutes, we now believe there will be little change in interest rates for the remainder of the year.

	We measure net interest income at-risk by estimating the changes in net interest income resulting from instantaneous and sustained parallel shifts in interest rates of plus- or minus- 200 basis points over a twelve-month period. This provides a basis or benchmark for our Asset/Liability Committee to manage our interest rate risk profile. Presented below is a table showing our interest rate risk profile at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.


	Estimated
Changes in Interest	Percentage Change in
Rates	Future Net Interest Income
(basis points)
	2010		2009
+200	(1)	%	(1)
+100	(4)		(3)	%
No change	-		-
-100	-		(1)
-200	(1)		(3)

Our model suggests our interest rate risk has increased slightly from year end for an upward change in rates, and improved slightly for a downward change in rates. Our exposure to increasing rates has increased, because, if interest rates move upward our liability costs (deposits and borrowings) will rise faster than our asset yields. Our decreased exposure in a downward rate scenario is due mostly to loans which have reached floor interest rates.


		Item 4. Controls and Procedures

	The Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded, based on their evaluation as of June 30, 2010, that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c)) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms.

	Also, there have been no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second quarter of 2010, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.


	PART II -- OTHER INFORMATION
	CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

	Item 1. Legal proceedings

		In October 2009, the Bank was served with a Summons and Complaint filed in United States District Court for the Western District of New York in an action seeking class action status alleging that the Bank violated the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C. §1693 et seq. and its implementing regulations 12 C.F.R §205 et seq. by failing to post a notice on or at two of its automatic teller machines advising consumers who transact an electronic funds transfer of the fact that a fee may be imposed for the transaction and the amount of the fee. The plaintiff is seeking statutory damages on behalf of the class and attorney’s fees. Damages are capped by statute at $500,000, exclusive of costs and fees. On May 7, 2010, the Bank reached a settlement agreement with plaintiff’s counsel resolving all claims against the Bank. Approval of the settlement by the District Court is pending. All or a portion of the settlement may be covered by insurance.

	Item 1A. Risk Factors

	There has been no material change to the risk factors disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

	Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

	The following table sets forth, for the monthly periods indicated in 2010, the total number of shares purchased and the price paid per share by The Canandaigua National Corporation for treasury and by subsidiaries of the Company for compensation, including the Arthur S. Hamlin award. Each of these entities is considered an affiliated purchaser of the Company under Item 703 of Regulation S-K. The Company and subsidiaries purchase were determined based on the most recent price established in the sealed-bid auction immediately preceding the purchase. Purchases occur on an ad-hoc basis when shares become available in the marketplace and the Company is interested in purchasing these shares for the corporate purposes discussed above. Sales occur when corporate needs require the use of shares and there are none available in the market at the time.

Purchases and Sales of Equity Securities for the year to date through June 30, 2010


	Total	Average
	Shares	Price Per
Date	Purchased (#)	Share ($)	Purpose

March 2010	110	$ 341.46	Compensation
April 2010	35	$ 341.46	Compensation
June 2010	544	$ 341.46	Treasury


	Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

	None

	Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None

Item 5. Other information - Common Stock Trade

Unresolved Staff Comments

On February 1, 2010, the Company responded to a series of staff comments issued by the Commission in December 2009. Management believes its response has resolved all accounting-related staff comments. On July 2, 2010 the staff issued a response regarding our confidential filing of certain exhibits related to our acquisition of Genesee Valley Trust Company. We have responded within this document by filing additional exhibits.

Common Stock Trades

While the Company's stock is not listed on a national securities exchange and not actively traded, it trades periodically in sealed-bid public auctions administered by the Bank’s Trust Department for selling shareholders at their request. Due to the limited number of transactions, the quarterly high, low and weighted average sale prices may not be indicative of the actual market value of the Company's stock. The following table sets forth a summary of information about the Company's common stock during each period for transactions that were administered by the Bank’s Trust Department:


Date of Transaction	Number of Shares Sold	Average Price Per Share	Highest Accepted Bid	Lowest Accepted Bid

March 18, 2010	760	$ 341.46	$ 367.00	$ 335.00
June 17, 2010	800	$ 353.77	$ 370.00	$ 350.10

Although the Company’s common stock is not listed with a national securities exchange, it trades sporadically on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board System. The following table sets forth a summary of information about these trades. Due to the limited number of transactions, the quarterly high, low and weighted average sale prices may not be indicative of the actual market value of the Company's stock.

The OTC Bulletin Board^® (OTCBB) is a regulated quotation service that displays real-time quotes, last-sale prices, and volume information in over-the-counter (OTC) equity securities. An OTC equity security generally is any equity that is not listed or traded on NASDAQ^® or a national securities exchange. The OTCBB is a quotation medium for subscribing members, not an issuer listing service, and should not be confused with The NASDAQ Stock Market^SM. Investors must contact a broker/dealer to trade OTCBB securities. Investors do not have direct access to the OTCBB service. The Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC's) Order-Handling Rules which apply to NASDAQ-listed securities do not apply to OTCBB securities. The OTCBB market quotations set forth below reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.


Period	Number of Shares Transacted	Quarterly Average Sales Price	Quarterly High Sales Price	Quarterly Low Sales Price

1^st Quarter, 2010	452	$ 309.68	$ 330.00	$ 280.00
2^nd Quarter, 2010	187	$ 312.05	$ 320.00	$ 301.00

Item 6. Exhibits


	Exhibit	Where exhibit may be found:

(2.1)	Stock purchase Agreement, dated September 6, 2007, by and among Canandaigua National Corporation, Genesee Valley Trust Company	Filed Herewith*

(2.2)	Asset Purchase Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, by and among The Canandaigua National Bank and Trust Company, Greentree Capital Management, LLC, Peter J Gaess, and T.C. Lewis	Filed Herewith*

(2.3)	Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement, dated December 31, 2008, by and among The Canandaigua National Bank and Trust Company, Greentree Capital Management, LLC, Peter J. Gaess, and T.C. Lewis	Filed Herewith*

(3.i)	Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended	Filed as an Exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008

(3.ii.)	By-laws of the Registrant, as amended	Filed as an Exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008

(10.1)	Canandaigua National Corporation Stock Option Plan, as amended	Filed as an Exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008

(10.2)	Canandaigua National Corporation Incentive Stock Plan, as amended	Filed as an Exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008

(10.3)	The Canandaigua National Bank and Trust Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan #1	Filed as an Exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008

(10.4)	The Canandaigua National Bank and Trust Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan #2	Filed as an Exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008

(10.5)	Canandaigua National Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan	Filed as an Exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009

(10.6)	Employment Agreement of Joseph L. Dugan dated November 20, 2000	Filed as an Exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009

(10.7)	Stock Purchase Agreement, dated September 6, 2007, by and among Canandaigua National Corporation, Genesee Valley Trust Company, and the Shareholders of Genesee Valley Trust Company	Filed as an Exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009*

(10.8)	Asset purchase Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, by and among The Canandaigua National Bank and Trust Company, Greentree Capital Management, LLC, Peter J. Gaess, and T.C. Lewis	Filed as an Exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009*

(10.9)	Amendment to Asset purchase Agreement, dated December 31, 2008, by and among The Canandaigua National Bank and Trust Company, Greentree Capital Management, LLC, Peter J. Gaess, and T.C. Lewis	Filed as an Exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009*

(11)	Calculations of Basic Earnings Per Share and Diluted Earnings Per Share	Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(24)	Form of Power of Attorney for filing Forms 3, 4, 5 and 13 under 1934 Act	Filed as an Exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009


(31.1)	Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed Herewith

(31.2)	Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed Herewith

(32)	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed Herewith

	*The Company has requested the Securities and Exchange Commission to grant confidential treatment for certain portions of these agreements. Confidential information is omitted from these agreements and filed separately with the Commission

SIGNATURES

CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


		CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL CORPORATION
		(Registrant)



August 9, 2010		/s/ George W. Hamlin, IV
Date		George W. Hamlin, IV
		President and Chief Executive Officer


August 9, 2010		/s/ Lawrence A. Heilbronner
Date		Lawrence A. Heilbronner
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Attached files

Stock widget

Investing forum

CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL CORP Reports