Attached files
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2010
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
Commission file number: 001-32567
Alon USA Energy, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
74-2966572 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
7616 LBJ Freeway, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75251
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(972) 367-3600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the Registrants common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding as of
July 31, 2010, was 54,181,329.
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 7,713 | $ | 40,437 | ||||
Accounts and other receivables, net |
152,511 | 103,094 | ||||||
Income tax receivable |
18,128 | 65,418 | ||||||
Inventories |
239,503 | 214,999 | ||||||
Deferred income tax asset |
60,131 | 7,700 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
10,935 | 4,188 | ||||||
Total current assets |
488,921 | 435,836 | ||||||
Equity method investments |
20,681 | 43,052 | ||||||
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
1,471,379 | 1,477,426 | ||||||
Goodwill |
105,943 | 105,943 | ||||||
Other assets |
95,484 | 70,532 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,182,408 | $ | 2,132,789 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 347,721 | $ | 248,253 | ||||
Accrued liabilities |
78,668 | 92,380 | ||||||
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt |
52,446 | 10,946 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
478,835 | 351,579 | ||||||
Other non-current liabilities |
146,886 | 95,076 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
879,593 | 926,078 | ||||||
Deferred income tax liability |
330,708 | 328,138 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
1,836,022 | 1,700,871 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16) |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, par value $0.01, 10,000,000 shares
authorized; no shares issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, par value $0.01, 100,000,000 shares
authorized; 54,181,329 and 54,170,913 shares issued
and outstanding at June 30, 2010, and December 31,
2009, respectively |
542 | 542 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
290,328 | 289,853 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of income tax |
(28,475 | ) | (32,871 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
78,712 | 165,248 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
341,107 | 422,772 | ||||||
Non-controlling interest in subsidiaries |
5,279 | 9,146 | ||||||
Total equity |
346,386 | 431,918 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 2,182,408 | $ | 2,132,789 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except per share data)
For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net sales (1) |
$ | 840,361 | $ | 1,106,398 | $ | 1,419,674 | $ | 1,828,578 | ||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
751,075 | 988,318 | 1,289,790 | 1,528,048 | ||||||||||||
Direct operating expenses |
62,924 | 71,345 | 124,368 | 140,209 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
29,182 | 31,581 | 60,989 | 63,496 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
25,368 | 23,561 | 51,690 | 45,651 | ||||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses |
868,549 | 1,114,805 | 1,526,837 | 1,777,404 | ||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on disposition of assets |
474 | (1,600 | ) | 474 | (1,600 | ) | ||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(27,714 | ) | (10,007 | ) | (106,689 | ) | 49,574 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
(21,735 | ) | (21,023 | ) | (48,320 | ) | (49,279 | ) | ||||||||
Equity earnings of investees |
1,209 | 8,376 | 1,106 | 8,373 | ||||||||||||
Other income (loss), net |
(365 | ) | 191 | 13,839 | 448 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit),
non-controlling interest in loss of subsidiaries and
accumulated dividends on preferred stock of subsidiary |
(48,605 | ) | (22,463 | ) | (140,064 | ) | 9,116 | |||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
(17,093 | ) | (7,549 | ) | (51,806 | ) | 3,446 | |||||||||
Income (loss) before non-controlling interest in loss of
subsidiaries and accumulated dividends on preferred stock
of subsidiary |
(31,512 | ) | (14,914 | ) | (88,258 | ) | 5,670 | |||||||||
Non-controlling interest in loss of subsidiaries |
(2,253 | ) | (1,724 | ) | (6,057 | ) | (641 | ) | ||||||||
Accumulated dividends on preferred stock of subsidiary |
| 2,150 | | 4,300 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders |
$ | (29,259 | ) | $ | (15,340 | ) | $ | (82,201 | ) | $ | 2,011 | |||||
Earnings (loss) per share, basic |
$ | (0.54 | ) | $ | (0.33 | ) | $ | (1.52 | ) | $ | 0.04 | |||||
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic (in thousands) |
54,164 | 46,809 | 54,162 | 46,807 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per share, diluted |
$ | (0.54 | ) | $ | (0.33 | ) | $ | (1.52 | ) | $ | 0.04 | |||||
Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted (in thousands) |
54,164 | 46,809 | 54,162 | 46,810 | ||||||||||||
Cash dividends per share |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.08 | ||||||||
(1) | Includes excise taxes on sales by the retail segment of $13,531 and $11,770 for the three months and $26,317 and $22,814 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, and 2009, respectively. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)
For the Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders |
$ | (82,201 | ) | $ | 2,011 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) available to
common stockholders to cash provided by (used in) operating
activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
51,690 | 45,651 | ||||||
Stock compensation |
350 | 381 | ||||||
Deferred income tax expense |
(52,486 | ) | (35,977 | ) | ||||
Non-controlling interest in loss of subsidiaries |
(6,057 | ) | (641 | ) | ||||
Equity earnings of investees (net of dividends) |
(775 | ) | (6,879 | ) | ||||
Accumulated dividends on preferred stock of subsidiary |
| 4,300 | ||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
2,880 | 3,567 | ||||||
Amortization of original issuance discount |
812 | | ||||||
Write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs |
6,659 | | ||||||
(Gain) loss on disposition of assets |
(474 | ) | 1,600 | |||||
Changes in
operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition effects: |
||||||||
Accounts and other receivables, net |
(49,417 | ) | (24,001 | ) | ||||
Income tax receivable |
47,290 | 112,952 | ||||||
Inventories |
(7,160 | ) | (85,269 | ) | ||||
Heating oil crack spread hedge |
| 117,485 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(616 | ) | (410 | ) | ||||
Other assets |
(25,032 | ) | 4,751 | |||||
Accounts payable |
51,453 | 172,558 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
(533 | ) | (10,123 | ) | ||||
Other non-current liabilities |
2,057 | (4,992 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
(61,560 | ) | 296,964 | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(12,688 | ) | (29,244 | ) | ||||
Capital expenditures to rebuild the Big Spring refinery |
| (39,281 | ) | |||||
Capital expenditures for turnarounds and catalysts |
(11,531 | ) | (10,314 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from insurance to rebuild Big Spring refinery |
| 34,125 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of securities |
36,852 | | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets |
20,095 | | ||||||
Acquisition of Bakersfield refinery |
(32,409 | ) | | |||||
Earnout payment related to Krotz Springs refinery acquisition |
(4,375 | ) | | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(4,056 | ) | (44,714 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Dividends paid to stockholders |
(4,335 | ) | (3,746 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid to non-controlling interest |
(429 | ) | (288 | ) | ||||
Inventory supply agreement |
45,807 | | ||||||
Deferred debt issuance costs |
(2,354 | ) | (3,979 | ) | ||||
Revolving credit facilities, net |
(41,824 | ) | (126,506 | ) | ||||
Payments on long-term debt |
(5,473 | ) | (92,708 | ) | ||||
Additions to short-term debt |
76,500 | | ||||||
Payments on short-term debt |
(35,000 | ) | | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
32,892 | (227,227 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(32,724 | ) | 25,023 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
40,437 | 18,454 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 7,713 | $ | 43,477 | ||||
Supplemental cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 38,846 | $ | 48,477 | ||||
Cash paid (refunds received) for income tax |
$ | (46,374 | ) | $ | (106,511 | ) | ||
Non-cash activities: |
||||||||
Financing activity payments on
long-term debt from deposit held to secure
heating oil crack spread hedge |
$ | | $ | (50,000 | ) | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
(1) Basis of Presentation and Certain Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Alon USA Energy, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (collectively, Alon). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have
been eliminated. These consolidated financial statements of Alon are unaudited and have been
prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for
interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation
S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and notes required by GAAP for complete consolidated financial statements. In the
opinion of Alons management, the information included in these consolidated financial statements
reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring adjustments, which are necessary for a
fair presentation of Alons consolidated financial position and results of operations for the
interim periods presented. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of the operating results that may be obtained for the year ending December 31, 2010.
The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009, has been derived from the audited
financial statements as of that date. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be
read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included
in Alons Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
(b) Revenue Recognition
Revenues from sales of refined products are earned and realized upon transfer of title to the
customer based on the contractual terms of delivery (including payment terms and prices). Title
primarily transfers at the refinery or terminal when the refined product is loaded into common
carrier pipelines, trucks or railcars (free on board origin). In some situations, title transfers
at the customers destination (free on board destination).
In the ordinary course of business, logistical and refinery production schedules necessitate
the occasional sale of crude oil to third parties. All purchases and sales of crude oil are
recorded net, in cost of sales in the consolidated statements of operations.
(c) New Accounting Standards
In February 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting
Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-09, Subsequent Event (Topic 855) which amends FASB Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 855, Subsequent Events so that SEC filers, as defined in the
ASU, no longer are required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been
evaluated in originally issued and revised financial statements. ASU 2010-09 is effective
immediately. ASU 2010-09 only affects disclosure requirements and will not have any effect on
Alons consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value which
amends FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure, to require entities to make new
disclosure about recurring and non-recurring fair-value measurements. The update requires new
disclosures regarding significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair-value
measurements and information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in
the reconciliation of Level 3 fair-value adjustments. The update provides additional guidance on
other fair value disclosures. This update is effective for interim and annual reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2009. ASU 2010-06 only affects disclosure requirements and will not
have any effect on Alons consolidated financial statements.
(d) Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period balances to conform to the
current presentation.
4
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
(2) Bakersfield Refinery Acquisition
On June 1, 2010, Alon completed the acquisition of the Bakersfield, California refinery
(Bakersfield refinery) from Big West of California, LLC, a subsidiary of Flying J, Inc. The
aggregate purchase price was $58,409 in cash which includes
hydrocarbon inventories. In
connection with the acquisition, an affiliate of Alon purchased certain refinery assets not
installed at the Bakersfield refinery location for $26,000. The remaining assets were purchased by
Alon. Alon incurred $309 of acquisition-related costs that were recognized in selling, general and
administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June
30, 2010.
The Bakersfield refinery is located in Californias Central Valley and has the capacity to
refine up to 70,000 barrels of crude oil per day. The refinery has traditionally been supplied by
local California crude oils produced in the San Joaquin Valley and the Los Angeles Basin.
Historically, this refinery has been a major provider of quality motor fuels in central California
and is also a large supplier of gas oil products to other refiners.
Alon plans to integrate the operations of the Bakersfield refinery with its other California
refineries by processing vacuum gas oil produced at these refineries in the hydrocracker located at
the Bakersfield refinery.
A preliminary independent appraisal of the assets acquired in the Bakersfield refinery
acquisition is in process. The estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are as follows:
Current assets |
$ | 17,033 | ||
Other assets |
17,122 | |||
Property, plant and equipment |
41,403 | |||
Other non-current liabilities |
(43,149 | ) | ||
Total consideration |
$ | 32,409 | ||
Alon anticipates it will finalize the purchase price allocation by December 31, 2010.
In connection with the acquisition of the Bakersfield refinery, Alon recorded a discounted
accrued environmental remediation obligation of $42,122. This amount is included as a non-current
liability in the consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2010.
Also in connection with the acquisition of the Bakersfield refinery, Alon entered into an
indemnification agreement with a prior owner for remediation expenses of conditions that existed at
the refinery on the acquisition date. Alon is required to make indemnification claims to the
prior owner by March 15, 2015. The discounted indemnification amount is $17,122 and is shown as a
non-current receivable in the consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2010.
(3) Segment Data
Alons revenues are derived from three operating segments: (i) refining and unbranded
marketing, (ii) asphalt and (iii) retail and branded marketing. The reportable operating segments
are strategic business units that offer different products and services. The segments are managed
separately as each segment requires unique technology, marketing strategies and distinct
operational emphasis. Each operating segments performance is evaluated primarily based on
operating income.
(a) Refining and Unbranded Marketing Segment
Alons refining and unbranded marketing segment includes sour and heavy crude oil refineries
located in Big Spring, Texas, and Paramount, Bakersfield and Long Beach, California (the
California refineries) and a light sweet crude oil refinery located in Krotz Springs, Louisiana.
At these refineries, Alon refines crude oil into products including gasoline, diesel, jet fuel,
petrochemicals, feedstocks, asphalts and other petroleum products, which are marketed primarily in
the South Central, Southwestern and Western regions of the United States. Finished products and
blendstocks are also marketed through sales and exchanges with other major oil companies, state and
federal governmental entities, unbranded wholesale distributors and various other third parties.
Alon also acquires finished products through exchange agreements and third-party suppliers.
5
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
(b) Asphalt Segment
Alons asphalt segment includes the Willbridge, Oregon refinery and 12 refinery/terminal
locations in Texas (Big Spring), California (Paramount, Long Beach, Elk Grove, Bakersfield and
Mojave), Oregon (Willbridge), Washington (Richmond Beach), Arizona (Phoenix, Flagstaff and
Fredonia), and Nevada (Fernley) (50% interest) as well as a 50% interest in Wright Asphalt Products
Company, LLC (Wright) which specializes in marketing patented tire rubber modified asphalt
products. Alon produces both paving and roofing grades of asphalt and, depending on the terminal,
can manufacture performance-graded asphalts, emulsions and cutbacks. The operations in which Alon
has a 50% interest (Fernley and Wright), are recorded under the equity method of accounting, and
the investments are included as part of total assets in the asphalt segment data.
(c) Retail and Branded Marketing Segment
Alons retail and branded marketing segment operates 306 convenience stores located primarily
in Central and West Texas and New Mexico. These convenience stores typically offer various grades
of gasoline, diesel fuel, general merchandise and food and beverage products to the general public
primarily under the 7-Eleven and FINA brand names. Alons branded marketing business markets
gasoline and diesel under the FINA brand name, primarily in the Southwestern and South Central
United States through a network of approximately 610 locations, including Alons convenience
stores. Historically, substantially all of the motor fuel sold through Alons convenience stores
and the majority of the motor fuels marketed in Alons branded business have been supplied by
Alons Big Spring refinery.
(d) Corporate
Operations that are not included in any of the three segments are included in the corporate
category. These operations consist primarily of corporate headquarters operating and depreciation
expenses.
Segment data as of and for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are
presented below:
Refining and | Retail and Branded | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||
Unbranded Marketing | Asphalt | Marketing | Corporate | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months ended June 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales to external customers |
$ | 481,442 | $ | 104,964 | $ | 253,955 | $ | | $ | 840,361 | ||||||||||
Intersegment sales/purchases |
209,889 | (52,643 | ) | (157,246 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
19,881 | 1,715 | 3,436 | 336 | 25,368 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(35,387 | ) | 463 | 7,734 | (524 | ) | (27,714 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total assets |
1,767,631 | 208,652 | 188,983 | 17,142 | 2,182,408 | |||||||||||||||
Turnaround, chemical catalyst,
capital expenditures and capital
expenditures to rebuild the Big
Spring refinery |
5,737 | 347 | 430 | 393 | 6,907 |
Refining and | Retail and Branded | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||
Unbranded Marketing | Asphalt | Marketing | Corporate | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months ended June 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales to external customers |
$ | 774,457 | $ | 125,480 | $ | 206,461 | $ | | $ | 1,106,398 | ||||||||||
Intersegment sales/purchases |
186,646 | (70,348 | ) | (116,298 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
18,300 | 1,701 | 3,412 | 148 | 23,561 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(17,193 | ) | 5,125 | 2,399 | (338 | ) | (10,007 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total assets |
1,783,680 | 276,316 | 197,556 | 14,987 | 2,272,539 | |||||||||||||||
Turnaround, chemical catalyst,
capital expenditures and capital
expenditures to rebuild the Big
Spring refinery |
27,022 | 414 | 894 | 654 | 28,984 |
6
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
Refining and | Retail and Branded | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||
Unbranded Marketing | Asphalt | Marketing | Corporate | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Six Months ended June 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales to external customers |
$ | 767,586 | $ | 172,105 | $ | 479,983 | $ | | $ | 1,419,674 | ||||||||||
Intersegment sales/purchases |
406,785 | (103,702 | ) | (303,083 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
40,835 | 3,432 | 6,856 | 567 | 51,690 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(93,905 | ) | (17,716 | ) | 5,875 | (943 | ) | (106,689 | ) | |||||||||||
Total assets |
1,767,631 | 208,652 | 188,983 | 17,142 | 2,182,408 | |||||||||||||||
Turnaround, chemical catalyst and
capital expenditures |
22,058 | 526 | 827 | 808 | 24,219 |
Refining and | Retail and Branded | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||
Unbranded Marketing | Asphalt | Marketing | Corporate | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Six Months ended June 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales to external customers |
$ | 1,278,407 | $ | 176,240 | $ | 373,931 | $ | | $ | 1,828,578 | ||||||||||
Intersegment sales/purchases |
315,993 | (114,876 | ) | (201,117 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
35,177 | 3,399 | 6,780 | 295 | 45,651 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
64,166 | (17,693 | ) | 3,776 | (675 | ) | 49,574 | |||||||||||||
Total assets |
1,783,680 | 276,316 | 197,556 | 14,987 | 2,272,539 | |||||||||||||||
Turnaround, chemical catalyst,
capital expenditures and capital
expenditures to rebuild the Big
Spring refinery |
75,918 | 576 | 1,113 | 1,232 | 78,839 |
Operating income (loss) for each segment consists of net sales less cost of sales, direct
operating expenses, selling, general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization,
and gain (loss) on disposition of assets. Intersegment sales are intended to approximate wholesale
market prices. Consolidated totals presented are after intersegment eliminations.
Total assets of each segment consist of net property, plant and equipment, inventories, cash
and cash equivalents, accounts and other receivables and other assets directly associated with the
segments operations. Corporate assets consist primarily of corporate headquarters information
technology and administrative equipment.
(4) Fair Value
The carrying amounts of Alons cash and cash equivalents, receivables, payables and accrued
liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these assets and
liabilities. The reported amounts of short-term and long-term debt approximate fair value.
Derivative financial instruments are carried at fair value, which is based on quoted market prices.
Alon must determine fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
As required, Alon utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs (levels
1 and 2) and minimize the use of unobservable inputs (level 3) within the fair value hierarchy.
Alon generally applies the market approach to determine fair value. This method uses pricing and
other information generated by market transactions for identical or comparable assets and
liabilities. Assets and liabilities are classified within the fair value hierarchy based on the
lowest level (least observable) input that is significant to the measurement in its entirety.
7
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
The following table sets forth the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis, by input level, in the consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2010, and December
31, 2009, respectively:
Quoted Prices in | ||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant | |||||||||||||||
for Identical | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Assets or | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Liabilities | Inputs | Inputs | Consolidated | |||||||||||||
(Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | Total | |||||||||||||
Six Months ended June 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Futures and forwards |
$ | 989 | $ | | $ | | $ | 989 | ||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Commodity swaps |
202 | 404 | | 606 | ||||||||||||
Commodity calls |
| 6,706 | | 6,706 | ||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
| 13,315 | | 13,315 | ||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Futures and forwards |
$ | 322 | $ | | $ | | $ | 322 | ||||||||
Commodity swaps |
| 89 | | 89 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Commodity swaps |
| 9,983 | | 9,983 | ||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
| 16,933 | | 16,933 |
(5) Derivative Financial Instruments
Commodity Derivatives Mark to Market
Alon selectively utilizes commodity derivatives to manage its exposure to commodity price
fluctuations and uses crude oil and refined product commodity derivative contracts to reduce risk
associated with potential price changes on committed obligations. Alon does not speculate using
derivative instruments. There is not a significant credit risk on Alons derivative instruments
which are transacted through counterparties meeting established collateral and credit criteria.
Alon has elected not to designate the following commodity derivatives as cash flow hedges for
financial accounting purposes. Therefore, changes in the fair value of the commodity derivatives
are included in income in the period of the change.
At June 30, 2010, Alon held net forward contracts for the sale of 250,035 barrels of refined
products at an average price of $85.44 per barrel. At June 30, 2009, Alon held net forward
contracts for purchases of 180,000 barrels of crude and sales of 250,000 barrels of refined
products at an average price of $69.07 per barrel. The contracts are recorded at their fair market
values and unrealized gains of $881 and $1,220 have been included in cost of sales in the
consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
At June 30, 2010, Alon also held futures contracts for the sale of 84,000 barrels of crude at
an average price of $76.92 per barrel. At June 30, 2009, Alon held net futures contracts for sales
of 72,000 barrels of refined products and sales of 176,000 barrels of crude at an average price of
$69.40 per barrel. Additionally, at June 30, 2009, Alon had calls at an average purchase price of
$5.04 per barrel for the purchase of 99,000 barrels of crude at an average strike price of $60.00
per barrel. The contracts are recorded at their fair market values and an unrealized gain of $108
and unrealized loss of $143 have been included in cost of sales in the consolidated statements of
operations for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
At June 30, 2009, Alon held futures contracts for 434,000 barrels of crude swaps at an average
price of $74.80 per barrel. The contracts are recorded at their fair market values and an
unrealized loss of $15,157 has been included in cost of sales in the consolidated statements of
operations for the three months ended June 30, 2009.
At June 30, 2010, the Company held futures contracts for sales of 292,400 barrels of heating
oil crack spread swaps at an average of $11.84 per barrel. Accordingly, the contracts are recorded
at their fair market values and an
8
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
unrealized loss of $404 has been included in cost of sales in the statements of operations for the
three months ended June 30, 2010.
At
June 30, 2010, Alon had written call contracts outstanding for the net purchase of 3,514,500 barrels of crude and sale of 3,514,500 barrels of heating oil at an average strike price
of $11.35 for a period of 21 months commencing October 2010. The fair value of the obligation in
excess of the premium received resulted in a loss of $60 included in cost of sales in the
consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
At June 30, 2010, Alon also held futures contracts for 2,846 ounces of platinum swaps and
2,534 ounces of palladium swaps at an average price of $1,542 and $446 per ounce, respectively.
The contracts are recorded at their fair market values and an unrealized loss of $202 has been
included in other income (loss) in the consolidated statements of operations for the three months
ended June 30, 2010.
Cash Flow Hedges
To designate a derivative as a cash flow hedge, Alon documents at the inception of the hedge
the assessment that the derivative will be highly effective in offsetting expected changes in cash
flows from the item hedged. This assessment, which is updated at least quarterly, is generally
based on the most recent relevant historical correlation between the derivative and the item
hedged. If, during the term of the derivative, the hedge is determined to be no longer highly
effective, hedge accounting is prospectively discontinued and any remaining unrealized gains or
losses, based on the effective portion of the derivative at that date, are reclassified to earnings
when the underlying transaction occurs.
Interest Rate Derivatives. Alon selectively utilizes interest rate related derivative
instruments to manage its exposure to floating-rate debt instruments. Alon periodically uses
interest rate swap agreements to manage its floating to fixed rate position by converting certain
floating-rate debt to fixed-rate debt. As of June 30, 2010, Alon had interest rate swap agreements
with a notional amount of $350,000 with remaining periods ranging from three months to 2.5 years
and fixed interest rates ranging from 4.25% to 4.75%. All of these swaps were accounted for as cash
flow hedges.
For cash flow hedges, gains and losses reported in accumulated other comprehensive income in
stockholders equity are reclassified into interest expense when the forecasted transactions affect
income. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, and 2009, Alon recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income unrealized after-tax gains of $2,352 and $3,665, respectively, for the fair
value measurement of the interest rate swap agreements. There were no amounts reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense as a result of the discontinuance of
cash flow hedge accounting.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, there was no hedge ineffectiveness
recognized in income. No component of the derivative instruments gains or losses was excluded from
the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
Commodity Derivatives. In May 2008, as part of financing the acquisition of the Krotz Springs
refinery, Alon entered into futures contracts for the forward purchase of crude oil and the forward
sale of heating oil of 14,849,750 barrels. These futures contracts were designated as cash flow
hedges for accounting purposes. Gains and losses for the futures contracts designated as cash flow
hedges reported in accumulated other comprehensive income in the balance sheet are reclassified
into cost of sales when the forecasted transactions affect income. In the fourth quarter of 2008,
Alon determined during its retrospective assessment of hedge effectiveness that the hedge was no
longer highly effective. Cash flow hedge accounting was discontinued in the fourth quarter of 2008
and all changes in value subsequent to the discontinuance were recognized into earnings. In April
2009, Alon completed an unwind of these futures contracts for $139,290.
Losses of $2,931 and $3,529 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and gains of
$3,068 and $4,014 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 have been reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive income to earnings since the discontinuance of cash flow hedge
accounting, respectively. All remaining adjustments from accumulated comprehensive income to cost
of sales will occur either over the four-month period beginning July 1, 2010, or earlier if it is
determined that the forecasted transactions are not likely to occur. No component of the derivative
instruments gains or losses was excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
9
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
The following table presents the effect of derivative instruments on the consolidated
statements of financial position.
As of June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | |||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet | Balance Sheet | |||||||||||||||
Location | Fair Value | Location | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Commodity contracts (futures, forwards, swaps and calls) |
Accounts receivable | $ | 108 | Accrued liabilities | $ | (1,619 | ) | |||||||||
Commodity contracts (futures, forwards, swaps and calls) |
| Other non-current liabilities |
(4,812 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
$ | 108 | $ | (6,431 | ) | |||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
$ | | Other non-current liabilities |
$ | (13,315 | ) | ||||||||||
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
| (13,315 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total derivatives |
$ | 108 | $ | (19,746 | ) | |||||||||||
As of December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | |||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet | Balance Sheet | |||||||||||||||
Location | Fair Value | Location | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Commodity contracts (futures, forwards and SPR swaps) |
Accounts receivable | $ | 411 | Accrued liabilities | $ | (9,983 | ) | |||||||||
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under FAS 133 |
$ | 411 | $ | (9,983 | ) | |||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
$ | | Other non-current liabilities |
$ | (16,933 | ) | ||||||||||
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under FAS 133 |
| (16,933 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total derivatives |
$ | 411 | $ | (26,916 | ) | |||||||||||
10
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
The following tables present the effect of derivative instruments on Alons consolidated
statements of operations and accumulated other comprehensive income (OCI).
Gain (Loss) Reclassified | ||||||||||||||||||||
from Accumulated OCI into | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income (Ineffective | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gain (Loss) Reclassified from | Portion and Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
Gain (Loss) Recognized | Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective | Excluded from | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash Flow Hedging Relationships | in OCI | Portion) | Effectiveness Testing) | |||||||||||||||||
Location | Amount | Location | Amount | |||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended
June 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity swaps (heating oil
swaps) |
$ | | Cost of sales | $ | (2,931 | ) | $ | | ||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
2,049 | Interest expense | (3,666 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
Total derivatives |
$ | 2,049 | $ | (6,597 | ) | $ | | |||||||||||||
For the Six Months Ended
June 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity swaps (heating oil
swaps) |
$ | | Cost of sales | $ | (3,529 | ) | $ | | ||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
3,618 | Interest expense | (7,224 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
Total derivatives |
$ | 3,618 | $ | (10,753 | ) | $ | | |||||||||||||
Gain (Loss) Reclassified | ||||||||||||||||||||
from Accumulated OCI into | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income (Ineffective | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gain (Loss) Reclassified from | Portion and Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
Gain (Loss) Recognized | Accumulated OCI into Income | Excluded from | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash Flow Hedging Relationships | in OCI | (Effective Portion) | Effectiveness Testing) | |||||||||||||||||
Location | Amount | Location | Amount | |||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended
June 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity swaps (heating oil
swaps) |
$ | | Cost of sales | $ | 3,068 | $ | | |||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
4,602 | Interest expense | (3,557 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
Total derivatives |
$ | 4,602 | $ | (489 | ) | $ | | |||||||||||||
For the Six Months Ended
June 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity swaps (heating oil
swaps) |
$ | | Cost of sales | $ | 4,014 | $ | | |||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
5,639 | Interest expense | (7,003 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
Total derivatives |
$ | 5,639 | $ | (2,989 | ) | $ | | |||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income | ||||||||
Location | Amount | |||||||
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
||||||||
Commodity contracts (futures & forwards) |
Cost of sales | $ | 267 | |||||
Commodity contracts (heating oil swaps) |
Cost of sales | (209 | ) | |||||
Commodity contracts (calls) |
Cost of sales | (60 | ) | |||||
Commodity contracts (commodity swaps) |
Other income (loss), net | (202 | ) | |||||
Total derivatives |
$ | (204 | ) | |||||
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
||||||||
Commodity contracts (futures & forwards) |
Cost of sales | $ | 1,740 | |||||
Commodity contracts (heating oil swaps) |
Cost of sales | (315 | ) | |||||
Commodity contracts (calls) |
Cost of sales | (60 | ) | |||||
Commodity contracts (commodity swaps) |
Other income (loss), net | (202 | ) | |||||
Total derivatives |
$ | 1,163 | ||||||
11
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income | ||||||||
Location | Amount | |||||||
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
||||||||
Commodity contracts (futures & forwards) |
Cost of sales | $ | (13,798 | ) | ||||
Commodity contracts (heating oil swaps) |
Cost of sales | 471 | ||||||
Commodity contracts (SPR swaps) |
Cost of sales | 1,073 | ||||||
Total derivatives |
$ | (12,254 | ) | |||||
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
||||||||
Commodity contracts (futures & forwards) |
Cost of sales | $ | (14,490 | ) | ||||
Commodity contracts (heating oil swaps) |
Cost of sales | 41,184 | ||||||
Commodity contracts (SPR swaps) |
Cost of sales | 174 | ||||||
Total derivatives |
$ | 26,868 | ||||||
(6) Inventories
Alons inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined under the
last-in, first-out (LIFO) method for crude oil, refined products, asphalt, and blendstock
inventories. Materials and supplies are stated at average cost. Cost for convenience store
merchandise inventories is determined under the retail inventory method and cost for convenience
store fuel inventories is determined under the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.
Carrying value of inventories consisted of the following:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Crude oil, refined products, asphalt and blendstocks |
$ | 111,816 | $ | 150,370 | ||||
Inventory consigned to others |
82,412 | 22,558 | ||||||
Materials and supplies |
19,883 | 18,069 | ||||||
Store merchandise |
18,634 | 18,856 | ||||||
Store fuel |
6,758 | 5,146 | ||||||
Total inventories |
$ | 239,503 | $ | 214,999 | ||||
Crude oil, refined products, asphalt and blendstock inventories totaled 2,661 barrels and
3,301 barrels as of June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Market values of crude oil, refined products, asphalt and blendstock inventories exceeded LIFO
costs by $104,434 and $100,496 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
(7) Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
Property, plant and equipment, net consisted of the following:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Refining facilities |
$ | 1,572,610 | $ | 1,535,841 | ||||
Pipelines and terminals |
39,213 | 39,213 | ||||||
Retail |
137,658 | 137,150 | ||||||
Other |
17,069 | 16,747 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, gross |
1,766,550 | 1,728,951 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(295,171 | ) | (251,525 | ) | ||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
$ | 1,471,379 | $ | 1,477,426 | ||||
12
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
(8) Additional Financial Information
The tables that follow provide additional financial information related to the consolidated
financial statements.
(a) Other Assets
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Deferred turnaround and chemical catalyst cost |
$ | 27,737 | $ | 24,387 | ||||
Environmental receivables |
20,857 | 3,448 | ||||||
Deferred debt issuance costs |
18,527 | 25,822 | ||||||
Intangible assets |
8,124 | 8,516 | ||||||
Other |
20,239 | 8,359 | ||||||
Total other assets |
$ | 95,484 | $ | 70,532 | ||||
Unamortized debt issuance costs of $6,659 related to the prepayment of the Alon Refining Krotz
Springs, Inc. revolving credit facility were written off in the first quarter of 2010.
In connection with the acquisition of the Bakersfield refinery on June 1, 2010, Alon entered
into an indemnification agreement with a prior owner for remediation expenses of conditions that
existed at the refinery on the acquisition date. Alon is required to make indemnification claims
to the prior owner by March 15, 2015. The discounted indemnification amount is $17,122 and is
shown in environmental receivables. Alon has also recorded a corresponding environmental
liability (Note 16).
(b) Accrued Liabilities and Other Non-Current Liabilities
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Accrued Liabilities: |
||||||||
Taxes other than income taxes, primarily excise taxes |
$ | 18,074 | $ | 20,205 | ||||
Employee costs |
7,766 | 6,716 | ||||||
Commodity swaps |
1,619 | 9,983 | ||||||
Valero earnout liability |
8,750 | 8,750 | ||||||
Other |
42,459 | 46,726 | ||||||
Total accrued liabilities |
$ | 78,668 | $ | 92,380 | ||||
Other Non-Current Liabilities: |
||||||||
Pension and other postemployment benefit liabilities, net |
$ | 35,851 | $ | 34,902 | ||||
Environmental accrual (Note 16) |
67,926 | 27,350 | ||||||
Asset retirement obligations |
9,977 | 8,789 | ||||||
Interest rate swap valuations |
13,315 | 16,933 | ||||||
Valero earnout liability |
2,188 | 6,562 | ||||||
Commodity swaps |
4,812 | | ||||||
Other |
12,817 | 540 | ||||||
Total other non-current liabilities |
$ | 146,886 | $ | 95,076 | ||||
13
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
(c) Comprehensive Income
The following table displays the computation of total comprehensive income:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) before non-controlling interest
in loss of subsidiaries and accumulated dividends
on preferred stock of subsidiary |
$ | (31,512 | ) | $ | (14,914 | ) | $ | (88,258 | ) | $ | 5,670 | |||||
Other comprehensive gain (loss), net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges, net of tax |
3,178 | 1,408 | 4,575 | 1,136 | ||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax |
3,178 | 1,408 | 4,575 | 1,136 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
(28,334 | ) | (13,506 | ) | (83,683 | ) | 6,806 | |||||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to
non-controlling interest (including
accumulated dividends on preferred shares of
subsidiary) |
(2,117 | ) | 527 | (5,878 | ) | 3,740 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common
stockholders |
$ | (26,217 | ) | $ | (14,033 | ) | $ | (77,805 | ) | $ | 3,066 | |||||
The following table displays the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of
tax.
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax |
$ | (11,499 | ) | $ | (15,895 | ) | ||
Pension and post-employment benefits, net of tax |
(16,976 | ) | (16,976 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
$ | (28,475 | ) | $ | (32,871 | ) | ||
(9) Postretirement Benefits
Alon has three defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all of its refining and
unbranded marketing segment employees, excluding West Coast employees and employees of SCS. The
benefits are based on years of service and the employees final average monthly compensation.
Alons funding policy is to contribute annually not less than the minimum required nor more than
the maximum amount that can be deducted for federal income tax purposes. Contributions are intended
to provide not only for benefits attributed to service to date but also for those benefits expected
to be earned in the future. Alons estimated contributions during 2010 to its pension plans has not
changed significantly from amounts previously disclosed in Alons consolidated financial statements
for the year ended December 31, 2009. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, and 2009, Alon
contributed $1,940 and $1,395, respectively, to its qualified pension plans.
The components of net periodic benefit cost related to Alons benefit plans were as follows
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, and 2009:
For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Components of net periodic benefit cost: |
||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 1,019 | $ | 836 | $ | 2,037 | $ | 1,673 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
946 | 840 | 1,892 | 1,681 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(905 | ) | (839 | ) | (1,810 | ) | (1,679 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of net loss |
385 | 263 | 771 | 526 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 1,445 | $ | 1,100 | $ | 2,890 | $ | 2,201 | ||||||||
14
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
(10) Indebtedness
Debt consisted of the following:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Term loan credit facility |
$ | 432,000 | $ | 434,250 | ||||
Revolving credit facilities |
174,753 | 216,577 | ||||||
Senior secured notes |
206,505 | 205,693 | ||||||
Short-term debt |
41,500 | | ||||||
Retail credit facilities |
77,281 | 80,504 | ||||||
Total debt |
932,039 | 937,024 | ||||||
Less short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt |
(52,446 | ) | (10,946 | ) | ||||
Total long-term debt |
$ | 879,593 | $ | 926,078 | ||||
(a) Alon USA Energy, Inc. Credit Facilities
Term Loan Credit Facility. Alon has a term loan (the Alon Energy Term Loan) that will mature
on August 2, 2013. Principal payments of $4,500 per annum are paid in quarterly installments,
subject to reduction from mandatory events.
Borrowings under the Alon Energy Term Loan bear interest at a rate based on a margin over the
Eurodollar rate from between 1.75% to 2.50% per annum based upon the ratings of the loans by
Standard & Poors Rating Service and Moodys Investors Service, Inc. Currently, the margin is 2.25%
over the Eurodollar rate.
The Alon Energy Term Loan is jointly and severally guaranteed by all of Alons subsidiaries
except for Alons retail subsidiaries, those subsidiaries established in conjunction with the Krotz
Springs refinery acquisition and certain subsidiaries established in conjunction with the
Bakersfield refinery acquisition. The Alon Energy Term Loan is secured by a second lien on cash,
accounts receivable and inventory and a first lien on most of the remaining assets of Alon
excluding those of Alons retail subsidiaries, those subsidiaries established in conjunction with
the Krotz Springs refinery acquisition and certain subsidiaries established in conjunction with the
Bakersfield refinery acquisition.
The Alon Energy Term Loan contains customary restrictive covenants, such as restrictions on
liens, mergers, consolidations, sales of assets, additional indebtedness, different businesses,
certain lease obligations, and certain restricted payments. The Alon Energy Term Loan does not
contain any maintenance financial covenants.
At June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, the Alon Energy Term Loan had an outstanding balance
of $432,000 and $434,250, respectively.
Letters of Credit Facility. On March 9, 2010, Alon entered into an unsecured credit facility
with Israel Discount Bank of New York (the Alon Energy Letters of Credit Facility) for the
issuance of letters of credit in an amount not to exceed $60,000 and with a sub-limit for
borrowings not to exceed $30,000. This facility will terminate on January 31, 2013. On June 30,
2010, Alon had $60,000 of outstanding letters of credit under this facility. Borrowings under this
facility bear interest at the Eurodollar rate plus 3.00% per annum subject to an overall minimum
interest rate of 4.00%.
This facility contains certain customary restrictive covenants including financial covenants.
Certain of these covenants become applicable at September 30, 2010, while others first apply at
December 31, 2010.
(b) Alon USA LP Credit Facility
Revolving Credit Facility. Alon has a $240,000 revolving credit facility (the Alon USA LP
Credit Facility) that will mature on January 1, 2013. The Alon USA LP Credit Facility can be used
both for borrowings and the issuance of letters of credit, subject to a limit of the lesser of the
facility or the amount of the borrowing base under the facility.
15
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
Borrowings under the Alon USA LP Credit Facility bear interest at the Eurodollar rate plus
3.00% per annum subject to an overall minimum interest rate of 4.00%.
The Alon USA LP Credit Facility is secured by (i) a first lien on Alons cash, accounts
receivables, inventories and related assets and (ii) a second lien on Alons fixed assets and other
specified property, in each case, excluding those of Alon Paramount Holdings, Inc. (Alon
Holdings), and its subsidiaries other than Alon Pipeline Logistics, LLC (Alon Logistics), the
subsidiaries established in conjunction with the Krotz Springs refinery acquisition, the
subsidiaries established in conjunction with the Bakersfield refinery acquisition and Alons
retail subsidiaries.
The Alon USA LP Credit Facility contains certain restrictive covenants including maintenance
financial covenants. As currently amended, the maintenance financial covenants for the leverage
ratio and the interest coverage ratio will not apply until the fiscal quarter ending December 31,
2010. The maintenance financial covenant for the current ratio will continue to be measured for
all fiscal quarters of 2010.
Borrowings of $119,000 and $88,000 were outstanding under the Alon USA LP Credit Facility at
June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, respectively. At June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009,
outstanding letters of credit under the Alon USA LP Credit Facility were $120,022 and $128,963,
respectively.
(c) Paramount Petroleum Corporation Credit Facility
Revolving Credit Facility. Paramount Petroleum Corporation has a $300,000 revolving credit
facility (the Paramount Credit Facility) that will mature on February 28, 2012. The Paramount
Credit Facility can be used both for borrowings and the issuance of letters of credit subject to a
limit of the lesser of the facility or the amount of the borrowing base under the facility.
Borrowings under the Paramount Credit Facility bear interest at the Eurodollar rate plus a
margin based on excess availability. The average excess availability during June 2010 was $62,435
and the margin was 1.75%.
The Paramount Credit Facility is primarily secured by (i) a first lien on accounts
receivables, inventories and related assets and (ii) a second lien on Alon Holdings (excluding
Alon Logistics) fixed assets and other specified property.
The Paramount Credit Facility contains certain restrictive covenants related to working
capital, operations and other matters.
Borrowings of $55,753 and $45,290 were outstanding under the Paramount Credit Facility at June
30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, respectively. At June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, outstanding
letters of credit under the Paramount Credit Facility were $63,039 and $17,999, respectively.
(d) Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc. Credit Facilities
Senior Secured Notes. In October 2009, Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc. (ARKS) issued
$216,500 in aggregate principal amount of 13.50% senior secured notes (the Senior Secured Notes)
in a private offering. The Senior Secured Notes were issued at an offering price of 94.857%. The
Senior Secured Notes will mature on October 15, 2014 and the entire principal amount is due at
maturity. Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15.
ARKS received gross proceeds of $205,365 from the sale of the Senior Secured Notes (before
fees and expenses related to the offering). In connection with the closing, ARKS prepaid in full
all outstanding obligations under its term loan. The remaining proceeds from the offering were used
for general corporate purposes.
The terms of the Senior Secured Notes are governed by an indenture (the Indenture) and the
obligations under the Indenture are secured by a first priority lien on ARKS property, plant and
equipment and a second priority lien on ARKS cash, accounts receivable and inventory.
The Indenture also contains restrictive covenants such as restrictions on loans, mergers,
sales of assets, additional indebtedness and restricted payments. The Indenture does not contain
any maintenance financial covenants.
16
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
On February 17, 2010, ARKS exchanged $216,480 of Senior Secured Notes for an equivalent amount
of Senior Secured Notes (Exchange Notes) registered under the Securities Act of 1933. The
Exchange Notes are
substantially identical to the Senior Secured Notes, except that the Exchange Notes have been
registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not subject to transfer
restrictions.
At June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, the Senior Secured Notes had an outstanding balance
(net of unamortized discount) of $206,505 and $205,693, respectively. Alon is utilizing the
effective interest method to amortize the original issue discount over the life of the Senior
Secured Notes.
Short-Term Credit Facility. On March 15, 2010, ARKS entered into a $65,000 short-term credit
facility with Bank Hapoalim B.M. (the ARKS Term Facility). The ARKS Term Facility as currently
amended and restated matures on August 16, 2010. ARKS has agreed in principal with Bank Hapoalim
B.M. to extend the maturity date to November 15, 2010. ARKS originally borrowed $65,000 and has
repaid $35,000 as of June 30, 2010.
Borrowings under the ARKS Term Facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 3.00% and $30,000 was
outstanding under the ARKS Term Facility at June 30, 2010.
The ARKS Term Facility is secured by a second lien on all assets other than cash, accounts
receivable, and inventory of ARKS.
The ARKS Term Facility contains customary restrictive covenants, such as restrictions on
liens, mergers, consolidation, sales of assets, capital expenditures, additional indebtedness,
investments, hedging transactions, and certain restricted payments.
Revolving Credit Facility. On March 15, 2010, ARKS terminated its revolving credit facility
agreement (the ARKS Facility) and repaid all outstanding amounts thereunder. As a result of the
prepayment of the ARKS Facility, Alon recorded a write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs of
$6,659 as interest expense in the first quarter of 2010.
Borrowings of $83,287 and outstanding letters of credit of $2,765 were outstanding under the
ARKS Facility at December 31, 2009.
(e) Alon Bakersfield Operating, Inc. Credit Facility
Short-Term Credit Facility. On June 1, 2010, Alon Bakersfield Operating, Inc., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Alon, entered into an $11,500 secured credit facility with Bank Leumi USA as lender.
The facility is secured primarily by the hydrocarbon inventories acquired in the Bakersfield
refinery acquisition. The facility will mature on September 1, 2010. The principal is to be
repaid in a single payment on the maturity date, subject to reductions from mandatory prepayment
events. Borrowings under the facility bear interest at the Eurodollar rate plus 3.00% per annum,
subject to an overall minimum interest rate floor of 4.00% per annum.
Borrowings of $11,500 were outstanding under the facility at June 30, 2010.
The facility contains customary covenants, such as restriction on liens, mergers,
consolidations, sales of assets, additional indebtedness and different businesses. This facility
does not contain any maintenance financial covenants.
(f) Retail Credit Facilities
Southwest Convenience Stores, LLC (SCS) is a party to a credit agreement (the SCS Credit
Agreement) that matures on July 1, 2017. Monthly principal payments are based on a 15-year
amortization term.
Borrowings under the SCS Credit Agreement bear interest at a Eurodollar rate plus 1.50% per
annum.
Obligations under the SCS Credit Agreement are jointly and severally guaranteed by Alon, Alon
Brands, Inc., Skinnys, LLC and all of the subsidiaries of SCS. The obligations under the SCS
Credit Agreement are secured by a pledge of substantially all of the assets of SCS and Skinnys,
LLC and each of their subsidiaries, including cash, accounts receivable and inventory.
17
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
The SCS Credit Agreement contains customary restrictive covenants on its activities, such as
restrictions on liens, mergers, consolidations, sales of assets, additional indebtedness,
investments, certain lease obligations and certain restricted payments. The SCS Credit Agreement
also includes one annual financial covenant.
At June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, the SCS Credit Agreement had an outstanding balance
of $76,528 and $79,694, respectively, and there were no further amounts available for borrowing.
(g) Other Retail Related Credit Facilities
In 2003, Alon obtained $1,545 in mortgage loans to finance the acquisition of new retail
locations. The interest rates on these loans ranged between 5.5% and 9.7%, with 5 to 15-year
payment terms. At June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, the outstanding balances were $753 and
$810, respectively.
(11) Stock-Based Compensation
Alon has two employee incentive compensation plans, (i) the Amended and Restated 2005
Incentive Compensation Plan and (ii) the 2000 Incentive Stock Compensation Plan.
(a) Amended and Restated 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan (share value in dollars)
Alons original incentive compensation plan, the Alon USA Energy, Inc. 2005 Incentive
Compensation Plan, was approved by its stockholders in 2006. In May 2010, Alons stockholders
approved an amended and restated incentive compensation plan, the Alon USA Energy, Inc. Amended and
Restated 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan, which is a component of Alons overall executive
incentive compensation program. The Amended and Restated 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan permits
the granting of awards in the form of options to purchase common stock, SARs, restricted shares of
common stock, restricted common stock units, performance shares, performance units and senior
executive plan bonuses to Alons directors, officers and key employees. Other than the restricted
share grants and SARs discussed below, there have been no stock-based awards granted under the
Amended and Restated 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan.
Restricted Stock. Non-employee directors are awarded an annual grant of shares of restricted
stock valued at $25. The restricted shares granted to the non-employee directors under the Amended
and Restated 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan vest over a period of three years, assuming continued
service at vesting.
Compensation expense for the restricted stock grants amounted to $19 and $20 for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $31 and $31 for the six months ended June
30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in
the consolidated statements of operations. There is no material difference between intrinsic value
and fair value under FASB ASC Topic 718-10 for pro forma disclosure purposes.
The following table summarizes the restricted share activity from January 1, 2009:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Grant Date | ||||||||
Nonvested Shares | Shares | Fair Values | ||||||
Nonvested at January 1, 2009 |
7,662 | $ | 19.58 | |||||
Granted |
5,841 | 12.84 | ||||||
Vested |
(3,277) | 22.89 | ||||||
Forfeited |
| | ||||||
Nonvested at December 31, 2009 |
10,226 | $ | 14.67 | |||||
Granted |
10,416 | 7.20 | ||||||
Vested |
(4,473) | 16.77 | ||||||
Forfeited |
| | ||||||
Nonvested at June 30, 2010 |
16,169 | $ | 9.28 | |||||
As of June 30, 2010, there was $107 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Amended and Restated 2005
Incentive Compensation Plan. That
18
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period
of 2.4 years. The fair value of shares vested in 2010 was $31.
Stock Appreciation Rights. In March 2007, Alon granted awards of 361,665 Stock Appreciation
Rights (SARs) to certain officers and key employees at a grant price equal to $28.46. The March
2007 SARs vest as
follows: 50% on March 7, 2009, 25% on March 7, 2010, and 25% on March 7, 2011, and, pursuant
to an amendment to the grant agreements on January 25, 2010, are exercisable during the three-year
period following the date of vesting.
In July 2008, Alon granted awards of 12,000 SARs to certain employees at the close of the
Krotz Springs refinery acquisition at a grant price equal to $14.23. The July 2008 SARs vest as
follows: 50% on July 1, 2010, 25% on July 1, 2011, and 25% on July 1, 2012, and are exercisable
during the 365-day period following the date of vesting.
In December 2008, Alon granted an award of 10,000 SARs at a grant price equal to $14.23. The
December 2008 SARs vest as follows: 25% on December 1, 2010, 25% on December 1, 2011, 25% on
December 1, 2012 and 25% on December 1, 2013 and are exercisable during the 365-day period
following the date of vesting.
In January 2010, Alon granted awards of 177,250 SARs to certain officers and key employees at
a grant price equal to $16.00. The January 2010 SARs vest as follows: 50% on December 10, 2011, 25%
on December 10, 2012 and 25% on December 10, 2013 and are exercisable during the 365-day period
following the date of vesting.
In March 2010, Alon granted awards of 10,000 SARs at a grant price equal to $16.00 and 10,000
SARs at a grant price equal to $10.00 to an executive officer. The March 2010 SARs vest as follows:
50% on March 1, 2012, 25% on March 1, 2013, and 25% on March 1, 2014, and are exercisable during
the 365-day period following the date of vesting.
When exercised, all SARs are convertible into shares of Alon common stock, the number of which
will be determined at the time of exercise by calculating the difference between the closing price
of Alon common stock on the exercise date and the grant price of the SARs (the Spread),
multiplying the Spread by the number of SARs being exercised and then dividing the product by the
closing price of Alon common stock on the exercise date.
Compensation expense for the SARs grants amounted to $97 and ($60) for the three months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $306 and $240 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, and
2009, respectively, and is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the
consolidated statements of operations.
(b) 2000 Incentive Stock Compensation Plan
On August 1, 2000, Alon Assets, Inc. (Alon Assets) and Alon USA Operating, Inc. (Alon
Operating), majority owned, fully consolidated subsidiaries of Alon, adopted the 2000 Incentive
Stock Compensation Plan pursuant to which Alons board of directors may grant stock options to
certain officers and members of executive management. The 2000 Incentive Stock Compensation Plan
authorized grants of options to purchase up to 16,154 shares of common stock of Alon Assets and
6,066 shares of common stock of Alon Operating. All authorized options were granted in 2000 and
there have been no additional options granted under this plan. All stock options have ten-year
terms. The options are subject to accelerated vesting and become fully exercisable if Alon achieves
certain financial performance and debt service criteria. Upon exercise, Alon will reimburse the
option holder for the exercise price of the shares and under certain circumstances the related
federal and state taxes payable as a result of such exercises (gross-up liability). This plan was
closed to new participants subsequent to August 1, 2000, the initial grant date. Total compensation
expense recognized under this plan was $0 and $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, and $13 and $110 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, and 2009, respectively, and
is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of
operations.
19
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
The following table summarizes the stock option activity for Alon Assets and Alon Operating
for the six months ended June 30, 2010, and for the year ended December 31, 2009:
Alon Assets | Alon Operating | |||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||
Number of | Average | Number of | Average | |||||||||||||
Options | Exercise | Options | Exercise | |||||||||||||
Outstanding | Price | Outstanding | Price | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2009 |
2,793 | $ | 100 | 1,049 | $ | 100 | ||||||||||
Granted |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Exercised |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Forfeited and expired |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
2,793 | $ | 100 | 1,049 | $ | 100 | ||||||||||
Granted |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Exercised |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Forfeited and expired |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2010 |
2,793 | $ | 100 | 1,049 | $ | 100 | ||||||||||
The intrinsic value of total options exercised in 2010 was $0.
(12) Stockholders Equity (per share in dollars)
Common Stock Dividends
On June 15, 2010, Alon paid a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.04 per share on Alons
common stock to stockholders of record at the close of business on May 28, 2010.
(13) Earnings (Loss) Per Share (earnings per share in dollars)
Basic earnings (loss) per share are calculated as net income (loss) available to common
stockholders divided by the average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings
per share include the dilutive effect of restricted shares and SARs using the treasury stock method
and the dilutive effect of convertible preferred shares using the if-converted method.
The calculation of earnings (loss) per share, basic and diluted, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, and 2009 is as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders |
$ | (29,259 | ) | $ | (15,340 | ) | $ | (82,201 | ) | $ | 2,011 | |||||
Average number of shares of common stock outstanding |
54,164 | 46,809 | 54,162 | 46,807 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive restricted shares, SARs and conversion of
preferred shares |
| | | 3 | ||||||||||||
Average number of shares of common stock outstanding
assuming dilution |
54,164 | 46,809 | 54,162 | 46,810 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per share basic |
$ | (0.54 | ) | $ | (0.33 | ) | $ | (1.52 | ) | $ | 0.04 | |||||
Earnings (loss) per share diluted * |
$ | (0.54 | ) | $ | (0.33 | ) | $ | (1.52 | ) | $ | 0.04 | |||||
* | For the purpose of adjusting net income (loss) in the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share issued by Alons subsidiaries, the effect for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 is anti-dilutive and therefore excluded from the calculation. |
20
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
(14) Big Spring Refinery Fire
On February 18, 2008, a fire at the Big Spring refinery destroyed the propylene recovery unit
and damaged equipment in the alkylation and gas concentration units. The re-start of the crude unit
in a hydroskimming mode began on April 5, 2008, and the Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU)
resumed operations on September 26, 2008. Substantially all of the repairs to the units damaged in
the fire have been completed.
Alons insurance policies at the time of the fire provided a combined single limit of $385,000
for property damage, with a $2,000 deductible, and business interruption coverage with a 45 day
waiting period. Alon also had third party liability insurance which provided coverage with a limit
of $150,000 and a $5,000 deductible. Alon received insurance proceeds of $330,000 for work
performed through December 31, 2008 and $55,000 for business interruption recovery as a result of
the fire with $350,875 of proceeds received in 2008 and $34,125 of proceeds received in January
2009.
(15) Related-Party Transactions
Sale of Preferred Shares (per share amounts in dollars)
In connection with the acquisition of the Krotz Springs refinery, pursuant to a stock purchase
agreement (the Stock Purchase Agreement) Alon Israel Oil Company, Ltd. (Alon Israel) provided
letters of credit in the amount of $55,000 (the Original L/Cs) to support the borrowing base of
ARKS and purchased 80,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock par value $1,000.00 per share. Alon
Israel issued an additional $25,000 of letters of credit in the first quarter of 2009 for the
benefit of ARKS. In connection with the termination of the ARKS Facility, Alon returned to Alon
Israel $65,000 of letters of credit, leaving $15,000 of letters of credit outstanding at June 30,
2010. Alon Israel provided assurances of $30,000 to support Alon in connection with the Alon
Energy Letters of Credit Facility. In December 2009, Alon Israels shares of Series A Preferred
Stock were exchanged for Alon common stock.
Pursuant to a stockholders agreement (as amended, The Stockholders Agreement) entered into
in connection with the Stock Purchase Agreement, Alon Israel was granted an option (the L/C
Option), exercisable at any time the letters of credit are outstanding, to withdraw all or part of
the letters of credit and acquire shares of Series A Preferred Stock of Alon Refining Louisiana,
Inc. (ARL) at their par value of $1,000.00 per share, in an amount equal to such withdrawn
letters of credit (the L/C Preferred Shares).
Under the terms of the Stockholders Agreement, with respect to the L/C Preferred Shares,
during the period beginning on the date of issuance of any L/C Preferred Shares in connection with
the exercise of the L/C Option and ending on December 31, 2010, each of Alon Louisiana Holdings,
Inc. (Alon Louisiana Holdings) and Alon have the option to purchase from Alon Israel all or a
portion of the then-outstanding L/C Preferred Shares at a price per share equal to the par value
plus accrued but unpaid dividends (the Call Option), subject to the prior release of all of the
letters of credit and conditioned upon approval of the purchase by Alons Audit Committee.
If the Call Option is not exercised by Alon Louisiana Holdings or Alon, the L/C Preferred
Shares are exchangeable for shares of Alon common stock in accordance with the terms of the
Stockholders Agreement. Specifically, (i) the L/C Preferred Shares may be exchanged at the election
of either Alon or Alon Israel, for shares of Alon common stock upon a change of control of either
ARL or Alon; (ii) in the event that the Call Option is not exercised, Alon Israel will have the
option to exchange L/C Preferred Shares it then holds for Alon common stock during a 5-business day
period beginning on the first day on which Alons securities trading window is open after each of
January 3, 2010, July 1, 2010, and January 1, 2011; and (iii) if not so exchanged, all of the L/C
Preferred Shares will be mandatorily exchanged for shares of Alon common stock on July 3, 2011.
Pursuant to the Stockholders Agreement, in the event that any letter of credit is drawn upon
by beneficiaries of a letter of credit, a promissory note will be issued by Alon Louisiana Holdings
in favor of Alon Israel for the amount of any such drawn letters of credit. This promissory note
will provide that Alon may exchange the promissory note for shares of Alon common stock.
Sale of HEP Units
In January 2010, Alon sold 150,200 Holly Energy Partners (HEP) units to each of Dor-Alon
Energy in Israel (1988) Ltd. and Blue Square Israel, Ltd. respectively, both affiliates of Alon
Israel and Alon also exchanged
287,258 HEP units for auction rate securities held by Alon Israel (which were sold in March
2010 and no gain or loss
21
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
was recognized). The HEP units sold and exchanged were based on a price
per unit based on the average closing price of HEPs publically traded Class A limited partnership
units for the 30 trading days preceding the closing of such transaction for a total of $22,760.
Richmond Beach Property Sale
On April 22, 2010, Alon entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with BSRE Point Wells, LP
(BSRE), a subsidiary of Blue Square-Israel, Ltd., an affiliated entity, to sell a parcel of land
at Richmond Beach, Washington for $19,500. The sale of the land was completed on June 1, 2010 and
Alon deferred recognition of the gain on the sale of land of $5,539 as the land was sold to an
affiliated entity. The deferred gain will be recognized at such time as the property is sold to a
third party.
In conjunction with the sale, Alon entered into a development agreement with BSRE. The
agreement provides that Alon and BSRE, in order to enhance the value of the land with a view
towards maximizing the proceeds from its sale, intend to cooperate in the development and
construction of a mixed-use residential and planned community real estate project on the land. As
part of this agreement, Alon agreed to pay a development fee of $439 on a quarterly basis beginning
July 1, 2010 in exchange for the right to participate in the potential profits realized by BSRE
from the development of the land.
(16) Commitments and Contingencies
(a) Commitments
In the normal course of business, Alon has long-term commitments to purchase utilities such as
natural gas, electricity and water for use by its refineries, terminals, pipelines and retail
locations. Alon is also party to various refined product and crude oil supply and exchange
agreements. These agreements are short-term in nature or provide terms for cancellation.
Offtake Agreement with Valero
In connection with the Krotz Springs refinery acquisition, in July 2008 Alon and Valero Energy
Corporation (Valero) entered into an offtake agreement for five years that provides for Valero to
purchase, at market prices, light cycle oil and straight run diesel.
Earnout Settlement with Valero
In connection with the Krotz Springs refinery acquisition, in July 2008 Alon and Valero
entered into an earnout agreement which was amended in August 2009. Alon has paid Valero
approximately $19,688 in 2009 and $4,374 in the first six months of 2010. Additionally, Alon has
agreed to pay Valero an additional sum of $10,937 in five installments of approximately $2,188 per
quarter through the third quarter of 2011 which will result in aggregate earnout payments of
$35,000. Of the $10,937 that remains to be paid, $8,750 is included in accrued liabilities and
$2,188 is included in other non-current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet at June 30,
2010.
Supply and Offtake Agreement with J. Aron & Company
On April 21, 2010, ARKS entered into a Supply and Offtake Agreement, which was amended on May
26, 2010 (the Supply and Offtake Agreement), with J. Aron & Company (J. Aron), the proceeds of
which allowed ARKS to retire part of its obligations under the ARKS Term Facility and support the
operation of the refinery at a minimum of 72,000 barrels per day. Pursuant to the Supply and Offtake Agreement,
(i) J. Aron agreed to sell to ARKS, and ARKS agreed to buy from J. Aron, at market price, crude oil
for processing at the Krotz Springs refinery and (ii) ARKS agreed to sell, and J. Aron agreed to
buy, at market price, certain refined products produced at the Krotz Springs refinery.
In connection with the execution of the Supply and Offtake Agreement, ARKS also entered into
agreements that provided for the sale, at market price, of ARKS crude oil and certain refined
product inventories to J. Aron, the lease to J. Aron of crude oil and refined product storage tanks
located at the Krotz Springs refinery, and an agreement to identify prospective purchasers of
refined products on J. Arons behalf. The Supply and Offtake Agreement has an initial term that
expires on May 31, 2012 and automatically renews for up to two additional 12-month terms unless
22
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
either party provides notice of termination at least six months prior to the end of the
then-current term. Following expiration or termination of the Supply and Offtake Agreement, ARKS is
obligated to purchase the crude oil and refined product inventories then owned by J. Aron and
located at the Krotz Springs refinery.
Standby LC Facility
On May 28, 2010, ARKS entered into a secured Credit Agreement (the Standby LC Facility) by
and between ARKS, as Borrower, and Goldman Sachs Bank USA, as Issuing Bank. The Standby LC Facility
provides for up to $200,000 of letters of credit to be issued to J. Aron. Obligations under the
Standby LC Facility are secured by a first priority lien on the existing and future accounts
receivable and inventory of ARKS. At this time there is no further availability under the Standby
LC Facility.
The Standby LC Facility includes customary events of default and restrictions on the
activities of ARKS and its subsidiaries. The Standby LC Facility contains no maintenance financial
covenants.
(b) Contingencies
Alon is involved in various other claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of
business. Alon believes the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material effect
on Alons financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
(c) Environmental
Alon is subject to federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations. These rules
regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may require Alon to incur future
obligations to investigate the effects of the release or disposal of certain petroleum, chemical,
and mineral substances at various sites; to remediate or restore these sites; to compensate others
for damage to property and natural resources and for remediation and restoration costs. These
possible obligations relate to sites owned by Alon and associated with past or present operations.
Alon is currently participating in environmental investigations, assessments and cleanups under
these regulations at service stations, pipelines and terminals. Alon may in the future be involved
in additional environmental investigations, assessments and cleanups. The magnitude of future
costs will depend on factors such as the unknown nature and contamination at many sites, the
timing, extent and method of the remedial actions which may be required, and the determination of
Alons liability in proportion to other responsible parties.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future economic
benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations and that have
no future economic benefit are expensed. Liabilities for expenditures of a non-capital nature are
recorded when environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Substantially all amounts accrued are expected to be paid out over the next
15 years. The level of future expenditures for environmental remediation obligations cannot be
determined with any degree of reliability.
Alon has accrued environmental remediation obligations of $70,395 ($2,469 current payable and
$67,926 non-current liability) at June 30, 2010, and $29,454 ($2,104 current payable and $27,350
non-current liability) at December 31, 2009.
In connection with the acquisition of the Bakersfield refinery on June 1, 2010, Alon recorded
a discounted accrued environmental remediation obligation of $42,122 which is included as part of
the non-current liability at June 30, 2010.
Also in connection with the acquisition of the Bakersfield refinery on June 1, 2010, a
subsidiary of Alon entered into an indemnification agreement with a prior owner for remediation
expenses of conditions that existed at the refinery on the acquisition date. Alon is required to
make indemnification claims to the prior owner by March 15, 2015. The discounted indemnification
amount is $17,122 and has been recorded as a non-current receivable at June 30, 2010.
Paramount Petroleum Corporation has indemnification agreements with a prior owner for part of
the remediation expenses at its refineries and offsite tank farm and, as a result, has recorded a
current receivable of $1,200 and non-current receivable of $3,735 at June 30, 2010.
23
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
In connection with the acquisition of the Big Spring refinery, pipeline and terminal assets
from Atofina Petrochemicals, Inc. (Atofina) in August 2000, Atofina agreed to indemnify Alon for
the costs of environmental investigations, assessments and clean-ups of known conditions that
existed at the acquisition date, and as a result, has recorded a current receivable of $35 at June
30, 2010.
(17) Subsequent Event
Dividend Declared
On August 4, 2010, Alon declared its regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.04 per share on
Alons common stock, payable on September 15, 2010 to stockholders of record at the close of
business on August 31, 2010.
24
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read
in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. In this document, the words
Alon, the Company, we and our refer to Alon USA Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements contained in this report and other materials we file with the SEC, or in
other written or oral statements made by us, other than statements of historical fact, are
forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements relate to matters such as our industry, business strategy, goals and
expectations concerning our market position, future operations, margins, profitability, capital
expenditures, liquidity and capital resources and other financial and operating information. We
have used the words anticipate, assume, believe, budget, continue, could, estimate,
expect, intend, may, plan, potential, predict, project, will, future and similar
terms and phrases to identify forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations regarding future events, results
or outcomes. These expectations may or may not be realized. Some of these expectations may be based
upon assumptions or judgments that prove to be incorrect. In addition, our business and operations
involve numerous risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, which could result
in our expectations not being realized or otherwise materially affect our financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows.
Actual events, results and outcomes may differ materially from our expectations due to a
variety of factors. Although it is not possible to identify all of these factors, they include,
among others, the following:
| changes in general economic conditions and capital markets; | ||
| changes in the underlying demand for our products; | ||
| the availability, costs and price volatility of crude oil, other refinery feedstocks and refined products; | ||
| changes in the sweet/sour spread; | ||
| changes in the light/heavy spread; | ||
| the effects of transactions involving forward contracts and derivative instruments; | ||
| actions of customers and competitors; | ||
| changes in fuel and utility costs incurred by our facilities; | ||
| disruptions due to equipment interruption, pipeline disruptions or failure at our or third-party facilities; | ||
| the execution of planned capital projects; | ||
| adverse changes in the credit ratings assigned to our trade credit and debt instruments; | ||
| the effects of and cost of compliance with current and future state and federal environmental, economic, safety and other laws, policies and regulations; | ||
| operating hazards, natural disasters, casualty losses and other matters beyond our control; | ||
| the global financial crisis impact on our business and financial condition; and | ||
| the other factors discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 under the caption Risk Factors and in this Form 10-Q under Part II, Item 1A. |
25
Table of Contents
Any one of these factors or a combination of these factors could materially affect our future
results of operations and could influence whether any forward-looking statements ultimately prove
to be accurate. Our forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual
results and future performance may differ materially from those suggested in any forward-looking
statements. We do not intend to update these statements unless we are required by the securities
laws to do so.
Company Overview
We are an independent refiner and marketer of petroleum products operating primarily in the
South Central, Southwestern and Western regions of the United States. Our crude oil refineries are
located in Texas, California, Oregon and Louisiana and have a combined throughput capacity of
approximately 250,000 barrels per day (bpd). Our refineries produce petroleum products including
various grades of gasoline, diesel fuel, jet fuel, petrochemicals, petrochemical feedstocks,
asphalt, and other petroleum-based products.
Refining and Unbranded Marketing Segment. Our refining and unbranded marketing segment
includes sour and heavy crude oil refineries that are located in Big Spring, Texas; and Paramount,
Bakersfield and Long Beach, California; and a light sweet crude oil refinery located in Krotz
Springs, Louisiana. Because we operate the Long Beach refinery as an extension of the Paramount
refinery and due to their physical proximity to one another, we refer to the Long Beach,
Bakersfield and Paramount refineries together as our California refineries. The refineries in our
refining and unbranded marketing segment have a combined throughput capacity of approximately
240,000 bpd. At these refineries we refine crude oil into petroleum products, including gasoline,
diesel fuel, jet fuel, petrochemicals, feedstocks and asphalts, which are marketed primarily in the
South Central, Southwestern, and Western United States.
We market transportation fuels produced at our Big Spring refinery in West and Central Texas,
Oklahoma, New Mexico and Arizona. We refer to our operations in these regions as our physically
integrated system because we supply our retail and branded marketing segment convenience stores
and unbranded distributors in this region with motor fuels produced at our Big Spring refinery and
distributed through a network of pipelines and terminals which we either own or have access to
through leases or long-term throughput agreements.
We market refined products produced at our Paramount refinery to wholesale distributors, other
refiners and third parties primarily on the West Coast. Our Long Beach refinery produces asphalt
products. Unfinished fuel products and intermediates produced at our Long Beach refinery are
transferred to our Paramount refinery via pipeline and truck for further processing or sold to
third parties. Refined products produced at our Bakersfield refinery have historically been
marketed in central California. Currently, the refinery is shut-down as we plan to integrate the
operations of the Bakersfield refinery with our other California refineries by processing vacuum
gas oil produced at our California refineries in the hydrocracker located at the Bakersfield
refinery.
Krotz Springs liquid product yield is approximately 101.5% of total feedstock input, meaning
that for each 100 barrels of crude oil and feedstocks input into the refinery, it produces 101.5
barrels of refined products. Of the 101.5%, on average 99.0% is light finished products such as
gasoline and distillates, including diesel and jet fuel, petrochemical feedstocks and liquefied
petroleum gas, and the remaining 2.5% is primarily heavy oils. We market refined products from
Krotz Springs to wholesale distributors, other refiners, and third parties. The refinerys location
provides access to upriver markets on the Mississippi and Ohio Rivers and its docking facilities
along the Atchafalaya River allow barge access. The refinery also uses its direct access to the
Colonial Pipeline to transport products to markets in the Southern and Eastern United States.
Asphalt Segment. Our asphalt segment markets asphalt produced at our Texas and California
refineries included in the refining and marketing segment and at our Willbridge, Oregon refinery.
Asphalt produced by the refineries in our refining and marketing segment is transferred to the
asphalt segment at prices substantially determined by reference to the cost of crude oil, which is
intended to approximate wholesale market prices. Our asphalt segment markets asphalt through 12
refinery/terminal locations in Texas (Big Spring), California (Paramount, Long Beach, Elk Grove,
Bakersfield and Mojave), Oregon (Willbridge), Washington (Richmond Beach), Arizona (Phoenix,
Flagstaff and Fredonia) and Nevada (Fernley) (50% interest) as well as a 50% interest in Wright
Asphalt Products Company, LLC (Wright). We produce both paving and roofing grades of asphalt,
including performance-graded asphalts, emulsions and cutbacks.
Retail and Branded Marketing Segment. Our retail and branded marketing segment operates 306
convenience stores primarily in Central and West Texas and New Mexico. These convenience stores
typically offer
26
Table of Contents
various grades of gasoline, diesel fuel, general merchandise and food and beverage products to
the general public, primarily under the 7-Eleven and FINA brand names. Substantially all of the
motor fuel sold through our retail operations and the majority of the motor fuel marketed in our
branded business is supplied by our Big Spring refinery. In 2010, approximately 91% of the motor
fuel requirements of our branded marketing operations, including retail operations, were supplied
by our Big Spring refinery.
We market gasoline and diesel under the FINA brand name through a network of approximately 610
locations, including our convenience stores. Approximately 67% of the gasoline and 23% of the
diesel motor fuel produced at our Big Spring refinery was transferred to our retail and branded
marketing segment at prices substantially determined by reference to commodity pricing information
published by Platts. Additionally, our retail and branded marketing segment licenses the use of the
FINA brand name and provides credit card processing services to approximately 285 licensed
locations that are not under fuel supply agreements with us. Branded distributors that are not part
of our integrated supply system, primarily in Central Texas, are supplied with motor fuels we
obtain from third-party suppliers.
Second Quarter Operational and Financial Highlights
Operating income (loss) for the second quarter of 2010 was ($27.7) million, compared to
($10.0) million in the same period last year. Operating income decreased principally due to lower
refinery throughput as a result of an extended turnaround at our Krotz Springs refinery, and
reduced rates at the California refineries as a result of our efforts to optimize asphalt
production with demand. Other operational and financial highlights for the second quarter of 2010
include the following:
| The Big Spring refinery and California refineries combined throughput for the second quarter of 2010, averaged 62,218 bpd, consisting of 42,775 bpd at the Big Spring refinery and 19,443 bpd at the California refineries compared to a combined average of 101,398 bpd in the second quarter of 2009, consisting of 61,573 bpd at the Big Spring refinery and 39,825 bpd at the California refineries. Throughput at the Krotz Springs refinery for the second quarter of 2010 was an average of 21,960 bpd compared to an average of 58,458 for the second quarter of 2009. The average throughput at the Krotz Springs refinery reflects only operations since its restart in June 2010. | ||
| Refinery operating margin at the Big Spring refinery was $9.58 per barrel for the second quarter of 2010, compared to $5.37 per barrel for the same period in 2009. This increase was primarily due to higher Gulf Coast 3/2/1 crack spreads and greater light/heavy spreads. | ||
| Refinery operating margin at the California refineries was $2.87 per barrel for the second quarter of 2010, compared to $2.47 per barrel for the same period in 2009. This increase primarily resulted from higher West Coast 3/2/1 crack spreads and greater sweet/sour spreads. | ||
| The average operating margin for the Krotz Springs refinery was ($1.95) per barrel for the second quarter of 2010 compared to $5.85 per barrel for the same period in 2009. The change reflects the refinery being down until June 2010. | ||
| Asphalt margins in the second quarter of 2010 were $67.12 per ton compared to $50.97 per ton in the second quarter of 2009. The average blended asphalt sales price increased 22.1% from $397.35 per ton in the second quarter of 2009 to $485.15 per ton in the second quarter of 2010 and the average non-blended asphalt sales price increased 160.8% from $145.04 per ton in the second quarter of 2009 to $378.25 per ton in the second quarter of 2010. | ||
| On June 15, 2010, Alon paid a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.04 per share on Alons common stock to stockholders of record at the close of business on May 28, 2010. |
Major Influences on Results of Operations
Refining and Unbranded Marketing. Our earnings and cash flow from our refining and unbranded
marketing segment are primarily affected by the difference between refined product prices and the
prices for crude oil and other feedstocks. The cost to acquire crude oil and other feedstocks and
the price of the refined products we ultimately sell depend on numerous factors beyond our control,
including the supply of, and demand for, crude oil, gasoline and
27
Table of Contents
other refined products which, in turn, depend on, among other factors, changes in domestic and
foreign economies, weather conditions, domestic and foreign political affairs, production levels,
the availability of imports, the marketing of competitive fuels and government regulation. While
our sales and operating revenues fluctuate significantly with movements in crude oil and refined
product prices, it is the spread between crude oil and refined product prices, and not necessarily
fluctuations in those prices that affect our earnings.
In order to measure our operating performance, we compare our per barrel refinery operating
margins to certain industry benchmarks. We compare our Big Spring refinerys per barrel operating
margin to the Gulf Coast and Group III, or mid-continent, 3/2/1 crack spreads. A 3/2/1 crack spread
in a given region is calculated assuming that three barrels of a benchmark crude oil are converted,
or cracked, into two barrels of gasoline and one barrel of diesel. We calculate the Gulf Coast
3/2/1 crack spread using the market values of Gulf Coast conventional gasoline and ultra low-sulfur
diesel and the market value of West Texas Intermediate, or WTI, a light, sweet crude oil. We
calculate the Group III 3/2/1 crack spread using the market values of Group III conventional
gasoline and ultra low-sulfur diesel and the market value of WTI crude oil. We calculate the per
barrel operating margin for our Big Spring refinery by dividing the Big Spring refinerys gross
margin by its throughput volumes. Gross margin is the difference between net sales and cost of
sales (exclusive of substantial unrealized hedge positions and inventories adjustments related to
acquisitions).
We compare our California refineries per barrel operating margin to the West Coast 6/1/2/3
crack spread. A 6/1/2/3 crack spread is calculated assuming that six barrels of a benchmark crude
oil are converted into one barrel of gasoline, two barrels of diesel and three barrels of fuel oil.
We calculate the West Coast 6/1/2/3 crack spread using the market values of West Coast LA CARBOB
pipeline gasoline, LA ultra low-sulfur pipeline diesel, LA 380 pipeline CST (fuel oil) and the
market value of WTI crude oil. The per barrel operating margin of the California refineries is
calculated by dividing the California refinerys gross margin by their throughput volumes. Another
comparison to other West Coast refineries that we use is the West Coast 3/2/1 crack spread. This is
calculated using the market values of West Coast LA CARBOB pipeline gasoline, LA ultra low-sulfur
pipeline diesel and the market value of WTI crude oil.
Our Krotz Springs refinerys per barrel margin is compared to the Gulf Coast 2/1/1 crack
spread. The 2/1/1 crack spread is calculated assuming that two barrels of a benchmark crude oil are
converted into one barrel of gasoline and one barrel of diesel. We calculate the Gulf Coast 2/1/1
crack spread using the market values of Gulf Coast conventional gasoline and Gulf Coast high sulfur
diesel and the market value of WTI crude oil.
Our Big Spring refinery and California refineries are capable of processing substantial
volumes of sour crude oil, which has historically cost less than intermediate and sweet crude oils.
We measure the cost advantage of refining sour crude oil at our refineries by calculating the
difference between the value of WTI crude oil less the value of West Texas Sour, or WTS, a medium,
sour crude oil. We refer to this differential as the sweet/sour spread. A widening of the
sweet/sour spread can favorably influence the operating margin for our Big Spring and California
refineries. In addition, our California refineries are capable of processing significant volumes of
heavy crude oils which historically have cost less than light crude oils. We measure the cost
advantage of refining heavy crude oils by calculating the difference between the value of WTI crude
oil less the value of MAYA crude, which we refer to as the light/heavy spread. A widening of the
light/heavy spread can favorably influence the refinery operating margins for our California
refineries.
The results of operations from our refining and unbranded marketing segment are also
significantly affected by our refineries operating costs, particularly the cost of natural gas
used for fuel and the cost of electricity. Natural gas prices have historically been volatile. For
example, natural gas prices ranged from $13.58 per million British thermal units, or MMBTU, in July
of 2008 to $2.51 MMBTU in September of 2009. Typically, electricity prices fluctuate with natural
gas prices.
Demand for gasoline products is generally higher during summer months than during winter
months due to seasonal increases in highway traffic. As a result, the operating results for our
refining and unbranded marketing segment for the first and fourth calendar quarters are generally
lower than those for the second and third calendar quarters. The effects of seasonal demand for
gasoline are partially offset by seasonality in demand for diesel, which in our region is generally
higher in winter months as east-west trucking traffic moves south to avoid winter conditions on
northern routes.
Safety, reliability and the environmental performance of our refineries are critical to our
financial performance. The financial impact of planned downtime, such as a turnaround or major
maintenance project, is
28
Table of Contents
mitigated through a diligent planning process that considers product availability, margin
environment and the availability of resources to perform the required maintenance.
The nature of our business requires us to maintain substantial quantities of crude oil and
refined product inventories. Crude oil and refined products are essentially commodities, and we
have no control over the changing market value of these inventories. Because our inventory is
valued at the lower of cost or market value under the LIFO inventory valuation methodology, price
fluctuations generally have little effect on our financial results.
Asphalt. Our earnings from our asphalt segment depend primarily upon the margin between the
price at which we sell our asphalt and the transfer prices for asphalt produced at our refineries
in the refining and unbranded marketing segment. Asphalt is transferred to our asphalt segment at
prices substantially determined by reference to the cost of crude oil, which is intended to
approximate wholesale market prices. The asphalt segment also conducts operations at and markets
asphalt produced by our refinery located in Willbridge, Oregon. In addition to producing asphalt at
our refineries, at times when refining margins are unfavorable we opportunistically purchase
asphalt from other producers for resale. A portion of our asphalt sales are made using fixed price
contracts for delivery of asphalt products at future dates. Because these contracts are priced at
the market prices for asphalt at the time of the contract, a change in the cost of crude oil
between the time we enter into the contract and the time we produce the asphalt can positively or
negatively influence the earnings of our asphalt segment. Demand for paving asphalt products is
higher during warmer months than during colder months due to seasonal increases in road
construction work. As a result, the revenues for our asphalt segment for the first and fourth
calendar quarters are expected to be lower than those for the second and third calendar quarters.
Retail and Branded Marketing. Our earnings and cash flows from our retail and branded
marketing segment are primarily affected by merchandise and motor fuel sales and margins at our
convenience stores and the motor fuel sales volumes and margins from sales to our FINA-branded
distributors, together with licensing and credit card related fees generated from our FINA-branded
distributors and licensees. Retail merchandise gross margin is equal to retail merchandise sales
less the delivered cost of the retail merchandise, net of vendor discounts and rebates, measured as
a percentage of total retail merchandise sales. Retail merchandise sales are driven by convenience,
branding and competitive pricing. Motor fuel margin is equal to motor fuel sales less the delivered
cost of fuel and motor fuel taxes, measured on a cents per gallon (cpg) basis. Our motor fuel
margins are driven by local supply, demand and competitor pricing. Our convenience store sales are
seasonal and peak in the second and third quarters of the year, while the first and fourth quarters
usually experience lower overall sales.
Factors Affecting Comparability
Our financial condition and operating results over the three and six months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009 have been influenced by the following factors which are fundamental to understanding
comparisons of our period-to-period financial performance.
The Krotz Springs refinery was shut down during November of 2009 for a scheduled turnaround
and remained down until the restart in June 2010. Throughput at the Big Spring refinery was lower
in the second quarter of 2010 as we addressed certain operational matters. The California
refineries throughput was lower in the second quarter of 2010 due to continued efforts to optimize
asphalt production with demand.
On June 1, 2010, we purchased the Bakersfield, California refinery from Big West of
California, LLC, a subsidiary of Flying J, Inc. The refinery has no refinery production at this
time and will require major turnaround work and additional capital expenditures before it can be
returned to operations and integrated with the other California refineries.
Results of Operations
Net Sales. Net sales consist primarily of sales of refined petroleum products through our
refining and unbranded marketing segment and asphalt segment and sales of merchandise, including
food products, and motor fuels, through our retail and branded marketing segment.
For the refining and unbranded marketing segment, net sales consist of gross sales, net of
customer rebates, discounts and excise taxes and includes inter-segment sales to our asphalt and
retail and branded marketing segments, which are eliminated through consolidation of our financial
statements. Asphalt sales consist of gross sales, net of any discounts and applicable taxes. Retail
net sales consist of gross merchandise sales, less rebates, commissions and discounts, and gross
fuel sales, including motor fuel taxes. For our petroleum and asphalt products, net sales are
29
Table of Contents
mainly affected by crude oil and refined product prices and volume changes caused by
operations. Our retail merchandise sales are affected primarily by competition and seasonal
influences.
Cost of Sales. Refining and unbranded marketing cost of sales includes crude oil and other raw
materials, inclusive of transportation costs. Asphalt cost of sales includes costs of purchased
asphalt, blending materials and transportation costs. Retail cost of sales includes cost of sales
for motor fuels and for merchandise. Motor fuel cost of sales represents the net cost of purchased
fuel, including transportation costs and associated motor fuel taxes. Merchandise cost of sales
includes the delivered cost of merchandise purchases, net of merchandise rebates and commissions.
Cost of sales excludes depreciation and amortization expense.
Direct Operating Expenses. Direct operating expenses, which relate to our refining and
unbranded marketing and asphalt segments, include costs associated with the actual operations of
our refineries and asphalt terminals, such as energy and utility costs, routine maintenance, labor,
insurance and environmental compliance costs. Environmental compliance costs, including monitoring
and routine maintenance, are expensed as incurred. All operating costs associated with our crude
oil and product pipelines are considered to be transportation costs and are reflected as cost of
sales.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative, or SG&A,
expenses consist primarily of costs relating to the operations of our convenience stores, including
labor, utilities, maintenance and retail corporate overhead costs. Refining and marketing and
asphalt segment corporate overhead and marketing expenses are also included in SG&A expenses.
30
Table of Contents
ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED
Summary Financial Tables. The following tables provide summary financial data and selected
key operating statistics for Alon and our three operating segments for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, and 2009. The summary financial data for our three operating segments does not
include certain SG&A expenses and depreciation and amortization related to our corporate
headquarters. The following data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. All information in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations except for
Balance Sheet data as of December 31, 2009 is unaudited.
For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands, except per | (dollars in thousands, except per | |||||||||||||||
share data) | share data) | |||||||||||||||
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: |
||||||||||||||||
Net sales (1) |
$ | 840,361 | $ | 1,106,398 | $ | 1,419,674 | $ | 1,828,578 | ||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
751,075 | 988,318 | 1,289,790 | 1,528,048 | ||||||||||||
Direct operating expenses |
62,924 | 71,345 | 124,368 | 140,209 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses
(2) |
29,182 | 31,581 | 60,989 | 63,496 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization (3) |
25,368 | 23,561 | 51,690 | 45,651 | ||||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses |
868,549 | 1,114,805 | 1,526,837 | 1,777,404 | ||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on disposition of assets |
474 | (1,600 | ) | 474 | (1,600 | ) | ||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(27,714 | ) | (10,007 | ) | (106,689 | ) | 49,574 | |||||||||
Interest expense (4) |
(21,735 | ) | (21,023 | ) | (48,320 | ) | (49,279 | ) | ||||||||
Equity earnings of investees |
1,209 | 8,376 | 1,106 | 8,373 | ||||||||||||
Other income (loss), net (5) |
(365 | ) | 191 | 13,839 | 448 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) before income tax expense
(benefit), non-controlling interest in loss of
subsidiaries and accumulated dividends on
preferred stock of subsidiary |
(48,605 | ) | (22,463 | ) | (140,064 | ) | 9,116 | |||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
(17,093 | ) | (7,549 | ) | (51,806 | ) | 3,446 | |||||||||
Income (loss) before non-controlling interest
in loss of subsidiaries and accumulated
dividends on preferred stock of subsidiary |
(31,512 | ) | (14,914 | ) | (88,258 | ) | 5,670 | |||||||||
Non-controlling interest in loss of subsidiaries |
(2,253 | ) | (1,724 | ) | (6,057 | ) | (641 | ) | ||||||||
Accumulated dividends on preferred stock of
subsidiary |
| 2,150 | | 4,300 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common
stockholders |
$ | (29,259 | ) | $ | (15,340 | ) | $ | (82,201 | ) | $ | 2,011 | |||||
Earnings (loss) per share, basic |
$ | (0.54 | ) | $ | (0.33 | ) | $ | (1.52 | ) | $ | 0.04 | |||||
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic (in
thousands) |
54,164 | 46,809 | 54,162 | 46,807 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per share, diluted |
$ | (0.54 | ) | $ | (0.33 | ) | $ | (1.52 | ) | $ | 0.04 | |||||
Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted
(in thousands) |
54,164 | 46,809 | 54,162 | 46,810 | ||||||||||||
Cash dividends per share |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.08 | ||||||||
CASH FLOW DATA: |
||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in): |
||||||||||||||||
Operating activities |
$ | (20,581 | ) | $ | 177,437 | $ | (61,560 | ) | $ | 296,964 | ||||||
Investing activities |
2,275 | (29,705 | ) | (4,056 | ) | (44,714 | ) | |||||||||
Financing activities |
18,459 | (122,548 | ) | 32,892 | (227,227 | ) |
31
Table of Contents
For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands, except per | (dollars in thousands, except per | |||||||||||||||
share data) | share data) | |||||||||||||||
OTHER DATA: |
||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA (6) |
$ | (1,976 | ) | $ | 23,721 | $ | (40,528 | ) | $ | 105,646 | ||||||
Capital expenditures (7) |
5,385 | 18,887 | 12,688 | 29,244 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures to rebuild the Big Spring
refinery |
| 7,146 | | 39,281 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures for turnaround and
chemical catalyst |
1,522 | 2,951 | 11,531 | 10,314 |
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
BALANCE SHEET DATA (end of period): |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 7,713 | $ | 40,437 | ||||
Working capital |
10,086 | 84,257 | ||||||
Total assets |
2,182,408 | 2,132,789 | ||||||
Total debt |
932,039 | 937,024 | ||||||
Total equity |
346,386 | 431,918 |
(1) | Includes excise taxes on sales by the retail and branded marketing segment of $13,531 and $11,770 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $26,317 and $22,814 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. | |
(2) | Includes corporate headquarters selling, general and administrative expenses of $188 and $190 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $376 and $380 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, which are not allocated to our three operating segments. | |
(3) | Includes corporate depreciation and amortization of $336 and $148 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $567 and $295 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, which are not allocated to our three operating segments. | |
(4) | Interest expense of $48,320 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, includes a charge of $6,659 for the write-off of debt issuance costs associated with our prepayment of the Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc. revolving credit facility. Interest expense of $49,279 for the three months ended June 30, 2009, includes $5,715 related to the unwind of the heating oil crack spread hedge. | |
(5) | Other income (loss), net for the six months ended June 30, 2010 substantially represents the gain from the sale of our investment in Holly Energy Partners. | |
(6) | Adjusted EBITDA represents earnings before non-controlling interest in income of subsidiaries, income tax expense, interest expense, depreciation and amortization and gain on disposition of assets. Adjusted EBITDA is not a recognized measurement under GAAP; however, the amounts included in Adjusted EBITDA are derived from amounts included in our consolidated financial statements. Our management believes that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA is useful to investors because it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors, and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies in our industry. In addition, our management believes that Adjusted EBITDA is useful in evaluating our operating performance compared to that of other companies in our industry because the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA generally eliminates the effects of non-controlling interest in income of subsidiaries, income tax expense, interest expense, gain on disposition of assets and the accounting effects of capital expenditures and acquisitions, items that may vary for different companies for reasons unrelated to overall operating performance. |
Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in
isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these
limitations are:
| Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; | ||
| Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the interest expense or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments on our debt; |
32
Table of Contents
| Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the prior claim that non-controlling interest have on the income generated by non-wholly-owned subsidiaries; | ||
| Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in or cash requirements for our working capital needs; and | ||
| Our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA may differ from EBITDA calculations of other companies in our industry, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure. |
Because of these limitations, Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered a measure of
discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business. We compensate for
these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using Adjusted EBITDA only
supplementally.
The following table reconciles net income (loss) available to common stockholders to Adjusted
EBITDA for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, and 2009, respectively:
For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders |
$ | (29,259 | ) | $ | (15,340 | ) | $ | (82,201 | ) | $ | 2,011 | |||||
Non-controlling interest in loss of subsidiaries
(including accumulated dividends on preferred stock of
subsidiary) |
(2,253 | ) | 426 | (6,057 | ) | 3,659 | ||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
(17,093 | ) | (7,549 | ) | (51,806 | ) | 3,446 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
21,735 | 21,023 | 48,320 | 49,279 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
25,368 | 23,561 | 51,690 | 45,651 | ||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on disposition of assets |
(474 | ) | 1,600 | (474 | ) | 1,600 | ||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | (1,976 | ) | $ | 23,721 | $ | (40,528 | ) | $ | 105,646 | ||||||
(7) | Includes corporate capital expenditures of $393 and $654 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, and 2009, respectively, and $808 and $1,232 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, which are not allocated to our three operating segments. |
33
Table of Contents
REFINING AND UNBRANDED MARKETING SEGMENT
For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands, except per barrel data and pricing statistics) | ||||||||||||||||
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA: |
||||||||||||||||
Net sales (1) |
$ | 691,331 | $ | 961,103 | $ | 1,174,371 | $ | 1,594,400 | ||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
651,470 | 889,519 | 1,115,334 | 1,358,882 | ||||||||||||
Direct operating expenses |
51,493 | 61,638 | 101,845 | 120,009 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
3,874 | 7,239 | 10,262 | 14,566 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
19,881 | 18,300 | 40,835 | 35,177 | ||||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses |
726,718 | 976,696 | 1,268,276 | 1,528,634 | ||||||||||||
Loss on disposition of assets |
| (1,600 | ) | | (1,600 | ) | ||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | (35,387 | ) | $ | (17,193 | ) | $ | (93,905 | ) | $ | 64,166 | |||||
KEY OPERATING STATISTICS: |
||||||||||||||||
Total sales volume (bpd) |
69,423 | 132,286 | 52,943 | 127,400 | ||||||||||||
Per barrel of throughput: |
||||||||||||||||
Refinery operating margin Big Spring (2) |
$ | 9.58 | $ | 5.37 | $ | 7.26 | $ | 8.83 | ||||||||
Refinery operating margin CA Refineries (2) |
2.87 | 2.47 | 1.29 | 3.99 | ||||||||||||
Refinery operating margin Krotz Springs (2) |
(1.95 | ) | 5.85 | (1.48 | ) | 8.91 | ||||||||||
Refinery direct operating expense Big Spring (3) |
5.78 | 4.70 | 6.18 | 4.14 | ||||||||||||
Refinery direct operating expense CA Refineries (3) |
7.46 | 3.80 | 8.12 | 4.65 | ||||||||||||
Refinery direct operating expense Krotz Springs (3) |
7.69 | 4.04 | 12.96 | 4.32 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
4,215 | 16,925 | 10,527 | 26,323 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures to rebuild the Big Spring refinery |
| 7,146 | | 39,281 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures for turnaround and chemical catalyst |
1,522 | 2,951 | 11,531 | 10,314 | ||||||||||||
PRICING STATISTICS: |
||||||||||||||||
WTI crude oil (per barrel) |
$ | 77.74 | $ | 59.54 | $ | 78.24 | $ | 51.36 | ||||||||
WTS crude oil (per barrel) |
75.92 | 58.15 | 76.39 | 50.20 | ||||||||||||
MAYA crude oil (per barrel) |
68.03 | 53.89 | 68.93 | 46.28 | ||||||||||||
Crack spreads (3/2/1) (per barrel): |
||||||||||||||||
Gulf Coast |
$ | 9.75 | $ | 8.30 | $ | 8.43 | $ | 8.97 | ||||||||
Group III |
11.47 | 9.34 | 9.13 | 9.53 | ||||||||||||
West Coast |
15.47 | 14.48 | 12.81 | 16.19 | ||||||||||||
Crack spreads (6/1/2/3) (per barrel): |
||||||||||||||||
West Coast |
$ | 4.82 | $ | 2.59 | $ | 3.15 | $ | 4.39 | ||||||||
Crack spreads (2/1/1) (per barrel): |
||||||||||||||||
Gulf Coast high sulfur diesel |
$ | 8.92 | $ | 6.63 | $ | 7.59 | $ | 8.04 | ||||||||
Crude oil differentials (per barrel): |
||||||||||||||||
WTI less WTS |
$ | 1.82 | $ | 1.39 | $ | 1.85 | $ | 1.16 | ||||||||
WTI less MAYA |
9.71 | 5.65 | 9.31 | 5.08 | ||||||||||||
Product price (dollars per gallon): |
||||||||||||||||
Gulf Coast unleaded gasoline |
$ | 2.053 | $ | 1.638 | $ | 2.046 | $ | 1.429 | ||||||||
Gulf Coast ultra low-sulfur diesel |
2.143 | 1.569 | 2.098 | 1.451 | ||||||||||||
Group III unleaded gasoline |
2.101 | 1.674 | 2.068 | 1.454 | ||||||||||||
Group III ultra low-sulfur diesel |
2.171 | 1.571 | 2.103 | 1.441 | ||||||||||||
West Coast LA CARBOB (unleaded gasoline) |
2.231 | 1.841 | 2.184 | 1.674 | ||||||||||||
West Coast LA ultra low-sulfur diesel |
2.196 | 1.606 | 2.136 | 1.478 | ||||||||||||
Natural gas (per MMBTU) |
4.35 | 3.81 | 4.66 | 4.13 |
34
Table of Contents
THROUGHPUT AND YIELD DATA:
BIG SPRING
BIG SPRING
For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bpd | % | bpd | % | bpd | % | bpd | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refinery throughput: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sour crude |
31,776 | 74.3 | 50,771 | 82.5 | 33,865 | 79.2 | 53,099 | 84.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sweet crude |
7,839 | 18.3 | 7,768 | 12.6 | 6,556 | 15.3 | 7,815 | 12.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blendstocks |
3,160 | 7.4 | 3,034 | 4.9 | 2,358 | 5.5 | 2,073 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total refinery throughput (4) |
42,775 | 100.0 | 61,573 | 100.0 | 42,779 | 100.0 | 62,987 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refinery production: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gasoline |
22,675 | 53.6 | 26,333 | 43.0 | 21,652 | 51.3 | 27,294 | 43.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diesel/jet |
12,654 | 29.9 | 19,571 | 32.0 | 13,195 | 31.3 | 20,648 | 32.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asphalt |
2,346 | 5.5 | 6,444 | 10.5 | 2,353 | 5.6 | 5,840 | 9.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Petrochemicals |
2,576 | 6.1 | 3,281 | 5.4 | 2,300 | 5.4 | 3,154 | 5.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
2,056 | 4.9 | 5,595 | 9.1 | 2,722 | 6.4 | 5,946 | 9.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total refinery production (5) |
42,307 | 100.0 | 61,224 | 100.0 | 42,222 | 100.0 | 62,882 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refinery utilization (6) |
56.6 | % | 83.6 | % | 60.5 | % | 87.0 | % |
THROUGHPUT AND YIELD DATA:
CALIFORNIA REFINERIES
CALIFORNIA REFINERIES
For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bpd | % | bpd | % | bpd | % | bpd | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refinery throughput: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Medium sour crude |
3,448 | 17.7 | 20,150 | 50.6 | 3,775 | 20.0 | 16,209 | 47.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heavy crude |
15,597 | 80.3 | 19,315 | 48.5 | 14,674 | 77.8 | 17,914 | 52.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blendstocks |
398 | 2.0 | 360 | 0.9 | 408 | 2.2 | 202 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total refinery throughput (4) |
19,443 | 100.0 | 39,825 | 100.0 | 18,857 | 100.0 | 34,325 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refinery production: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gasoline |
2,783 | 14.7 | 6,587 | 17.0 | 2,626 | 14.3 | 4,936 | 14.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diesel/jet |
4,060 | 21.4 | 9,086 | 23.4 | 3,717 | 20.3 | 7,658 | 22.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asphalt |
6,516 | 34.3 | 11,450 | 29.5 | 6,341 | 34.6 | 10,100 | 30.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Light unfinished |
| | 99 | 0.3 | | | 999 | 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heavy unfinished |
5,212 | 27.4 | 10,868 | 28.0 | 5,235 | 28.6 | 9,340 | 27.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
423 | 2.2 | 697 | 1.8 | 408 | 2.2 | 534 | 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total refinery production (5) |
18,994 | 100.0 | 38,787 | 100.0 | 18,327 | 100.0 | 33,567 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refinery utilization (6) |
26.3 | % | 54.4 | % | 25.4 | % | 56.1 | % |
THROUGHPUT AND YIELD DATA:
KROTZ SPRINGS (A)
KROTZ SPRINGS (A)
For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bpd | % | bpd | % | bpd | % | bpd | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refinery throughput: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Light sweet crude |
10,358 | 47.2 | 28,065 | 48.0 | 5,208 | 47.2 | 27,746 | 49.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heavy sweet crude |
10,693 | 48.7 | 26,362 | 45.1 | 5,376 | 48.7 | 23,240 | 41.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blendstocks |
909 | 4.1 | 4,031 | 6.9 | 457 | 4.1 | 5,113 | 9.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total refinery throughput (4) |
21,960 | 100.0 | 58,458 | 100.0 | 11,041 | 100.0 | 56,099 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refinery production: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gasoline |
8,427 | 38.6 | 27,962 | 47.1 | 4,237 | 38.6 | 26,215 | 46.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diesel/jet |
9,098 | 41.7 | 24,514 | 41.3 | 4,575 | 41.7 | 24,491 | 42.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heavy Oils |
2,809 | 12.9 | 1,358 | 2.3 | 1,412 | 12.9 | 1,124 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
1,485 | 6.8 | 5,521 | 9.3 | 746 | 6.8 | 5,205 | 9.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total refinery production (5) |
21,819 | 100.0 | 59,355 | 100.0 | 10,970 | 100.0 | 57,035 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refinery utilization (6) |
25.3 | % | 65.5 | % | 12.7 | % | 61.4 | % |
(A) | The throughput data reflects substantially one month of operations in June 2010 due to the restart after major turnaround activity. |
35
Table of Contents
(1) | Net sales include intersegment sales to our asphalt and retail and branded marketing segments at prices which approximate wholesale market price. These intersegment sales are eliminated through consolidation of our financial statements. | |
(2) | Refinery operating margin is a per barrel measurement calculated by dividing the margin between net sales and cost of sales (exclusive of substantial unrealized hedge positions and inventory adjustments related to acquisitions) attributable to each refinery by the refinerys throughput volumes. Industry-wide refining results are driven and measured by the margins between refined product prices and the prices for crude oil, which are referred to as crack spreads. We compare our refinery operating margins to these crack spreads to assess our operating performance relative to other participants in our industry. The refinery operating margin for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, excludes a benefit of $1,400 to cost of sales for inventory adjustments related to the Bakersfield refinery acquisition. There were unrealized hedging gains of $2,373 and $20,399 for the Krotz Springs refinery for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. Additionally, realized gains related to the unwind of the heating oil crack spread hedge of $133,581 were excluded from the Krotz Springs refinery margin for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. | |
(3) | Refinery direct operating expense is a per barrel measurement calculated by dividing direct operating expenses at our Big Spring, California, and Krotz Springs refineries, exclusive of depreciation and amortization, by the applicable refinerys total throughput volumes. Direct operating expenses related to the Bakersfield refinery of $410 have been excluded from the per barrel measurement for the calculation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. | |
(4) | Total refinery throughput represents the total barrels per day of crude oil and blendstock inputs in the refinery production process. | |
(5) | Total refinery production represents the barrels per day of various products produced from processing crude and other refinery feedstocks through the crude units and other conversion units at the refineries. | |
(6) | Refinery utilization represents average daily crude oil throughput divided by crude oil capacity, excluding planned periods of downtime for maintenance and turnarounds. |
36
Table of Contents
ASPHALT SEGMENT
For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands, except per ton data) | ||||||||||||||||
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA: |
||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 104,964 | $ | 125,480 | $ | 172,105 | $ | 176,240 | ||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales (1) |
90,264 | 107,897 | 161,709 | 168,130 | ||||||||||||
Direct operating expenses |
11,431 | 9,707 | 22,523 | 20,200 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
1,091 | 1,050 | 2,157 | 2,204 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,715 | 1,701 | 3,432 | 3,399 | ||||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses |
104,501 | 120,355 | 189,821 | 193,933 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | 463 | $ | 5,125 | $ | (17,716 | ) | $ | (17,693 | ) | ||||||
KEY OPERATING STATISTICS: |
||||||||||||||||
Blended asphalt sales volume (tons in
thousands) (2) |
207 | 299 | 336 | 446 | ||||||||||||
Non-blended asphalt sales volume (tons in
thousands) (3) |
12 | 46 | 34 | 83 | ||||||||||||
Blended asphalt sales price per ton (2) |
$ | 485.15 | $ | 397.35 | $ | 476.85 | $ | 369.93 | ||||||||
Non-blended asphalt sales price per ton (3) |
378.25 | 145.04 | 349.50 | 135.54 | ||||||||||||
Asphalt margin per ton (4) |
67.12 | 50.97 | 28.10 | 15.33 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 347 | $ | 414 | $ | 526 | $ | 576 |
(1) | Cost of sales includes intersegment purchases of asphalt blends from our refining and unbranded marketing segment at prices which approximate wholesale market prices. These intersegment purchases are eliminated through consolidation of our financial statements. | |
(2) | Blended asphalt represents base asphalt that has been blended with other materials necessary to sell the asphalt as a finished product. | |
(3) | Non-blended asphalt represents base material asphalt and other components that require additional blending before being sold as a finished product. | |
4) | Asphalt margin is a per ton measurement calculated by dividing the margin between net sales and cost of sales by the total sales volume. Asphalt margins are used in the asphalt industry to measure operating results related to asphalt sales. |
37
Table of Contents
RETAIL AND BRANDED MARKETING SEGMENT (A)
For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands, except per gallon data) | ||||||||||||||||
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA: |
||||||||||||||||
Net sales (1) |
$ | 253,955 | $ | 206,461 | $ | 479,983 | $ | 373,931 | ||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales (2) |
219,230 | 177,548 | 419,532 | 317,029 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
24,029 | 23,102 | 48,194 | 46,346 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
3,436 | 3,412 | 6,856 | 6,780 | ||||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses |
246,695 | 204,062 | 474,582 | 370,155 | ||||||||||||
Gain on disposition of assets |
474 | | 474 | | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 7,734 | $ | 2,399 | $ | 5,875 | $ | 3,776 | ||||||||
KEY OPERATING STATISTICS: |
||||||||||||||||
Branded fuel sales (thousands of gallons) (3) |
74,852 | 69,858 | 145,321 | 136,650 | ||||||||||||
Branded fuel margin (cents per gallon) (3) |
6.4 | ¢ | 4.7 | ¢ | 5.3 | ¢ | 5.1 | ¢ | ||||||||
Number of stores (end of period) |
306 | 306 | 306 | 306 | ||||||||||||
Retail fuel sales (thousands of gallons) |
35,408 | 30,198 | 68,122 | 58,381 | ||||||||||||
Retail fuel sales (thousands of gallons per
site per month) |
39 | 33 | 37 | 32 | ||||||||||||
Retail fuel margin (cents per gallon) (4) |
14.1 | ¢ | 12.5 | ¢ | 11.7 | ¢ | 14.1 | ¢ | ||||||||
Retail fuel sales price (dollars per gallon) (5) |
$ | 2.74 | $ | 2.26 | $ | 2.69 | $ | 2.08 | ||||||||
Merchandise sales |
$ | 73,247 | $ | 70,650 | $ | 136,728 | $ | 133,262 | ||||||||
Merchandise sales (per site per month) |
$ | 80 | $ | 76 | $ | 74 | $ | 73 | ||||||||
Merchandise margin (6) |
32.6 | % | 30.2 | % | 31.4 | % | 30.7 | % | ||||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 430 | $ | 894 | $ | 827 | $ | 1,113 |
(1) | Includes excise taxes on sales by the retail and branded marketing segment of $13,531 and $11,770 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $26,317 and $22,814 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Net sales also include royalty and related net credit card fees of $1,046 and $559 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $1,819 and $792 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. | |
(2) | Cost of sales includes intersegment purchases of motor fuels from our refining and unbranded marketing segment at prices which approximate wholesale market prices. These intersegment purchases are eliminated through consolidation of our financial statements. | |
(3) | Marketing sales volume represents branded fuel sales to our wholesale marketing customers that are primarily supplied by the Big Spring refinery. The branded fuels that are not supplied by the Big Spring refinery are obtained from third-party suppliers. The marketing margin represents the margin between the net sales and cost of sales attributable to our branded fuel sales volume, expressed on a cents-per-gallon basis. | |
(4) | Retail fuel margin represents the difference between motor fuel sales revenue and the net cost of purchased motor fuel, including transportation costs and associated motor fuel taxes, expressed on a cents-per-gallon basis. Motor fuel margins are frequently used in the retail industry to measure operating results related to motor fuel sales. | |
(5) | Retail fuel sales price per gallon represents the average sales price for motor fuels sold through our retail convenience stores. | |
(6) | Merchandise margin represents the difference between merchandise sales revenues and the delivered cost of merchandise purchases, net of rebates and commissions, expressed as a percentage of merchandise sales revenues. Merchandise margins, also referred to as in-store margins, are commonly used in the retail convenience store industry to measure in-store, or non-fuel, operating results. |
38
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
Net Sales
Consolidated. Net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2010, were $840.4 million,
compared to $1,106.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $266.0 million
or 24.0%. This decrease was primarily due to lower throughput at our refineries, partially offset
by higher refined product prices and higher revenues from increased retail fuel sales volumes.
Refining and Unbranded Marketing Segment. Net sales for our refining and unbranded marketing
segment were $691.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $961.1 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $269.8 million or 28.1%. The decrease in
net sales was primarily due to lower refinery throughput volumes, partially offset by higher
refined product prices.
The Big Spring refinery and California refineries combined throughput for the three months
ended June 30, 2010, averaged 62,218 bpd, consisting of 42,775 bpd at the Big Spring refinery and
19,443 bpd at the California refineries compared to a combined average of 101,398 bpd for the three
months ended June 30, 2009, consisting of 61,573 bpd at the Big Spring refinery and 39,825 bpd at
the California refineries. The Big Spring refinery throughput was lower as a result of efforts to
rectify operational and technical matters and the California refineries throughput was lower due
to our continued efforts to optimize asphalt production with demand. Throughput at the Krotz
Springs refinery for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was an average of 21,960 bpd compared to
an average of 58,458 for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The average throughput at the Krotz
Springs refinery reflects only operations since its restart in June 2010 after being down for major
turnaround activity.
The increase in refined product prices that our refineries experienced resembled the price
increases experienced in each refinerys respective markets. The average price of Gulf Coast
gasoline for the three months ended June 30, 2010 increased 41.5 cpg, or 25.3%, to 205.3 cpg,
compared to 163.8 cpg for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The average Gulf Coast ultra
low-sulfur diesel price for the three months ended June 30, 2010 increased 57.4 cpg, or 36.6%, to
214.3 cpg, compared to 156.9 cpg for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The average price of
West Coast LA CARBOB gasoline for the three months ended June 30, 2010 increased 39.0 cpg, or
21.2%, to 223.1 cpg, compared to 184.1 cpg for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The average
West Coast LA ultra low-sulfur diesel price for the three months ended June 30, 2010 increased 59.1
cpg, or 36.8%, to 207.6 cpg, compared to 160.6 cpg for the three months ended June 30, 2009.
Asphalt Segment. Net sales for our asphalt segment were $105.0 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2010, compared to $125.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, a
decrease of $20.5 million or 16.3%. The decrease was due primarily to a decrease in asphalt sales
volumes and partially offset by higher asphalt sales price for the three months ended June 30,
2010. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, the asphalt sales volume decreased 36.5% from 345
tons for the three months ended June 30, 2009, to 219 tons for the three months ended June 30,
2010. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, the average blended asphalt sales price increased
22.1% from $397.35 per ton for the three months ended June 30, 2009, to $485.15 per ton for the
three months ended June 30, 2010, and the average non-blended asphalt sales price increased 160.8%
from $145.04 per ton for the three months ended June 30, 2009, to $378.25 per ton for the three
months ended June 30, 2010.
Retail and Branded Marketing Segment. Net sales for our retail and branded marketing segment
were $254.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $206.5 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $47.5 million or 23.0%. This increase was
primarily attributable to increases in motor fuel prices, motor fuel volume and merchandise sales.
Cost of Sales
Consolidated. Cost of sales were $751.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010,
compared to $988.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $237.2 million
or 24.0%. This decrease was
39
Table of Contents
primarily due to lower refinery throughput volumes at our refining and unbranding marketing
segment and lower sales volumes at our asphalt segment, partially offset by higher crude oil
prices.
Refining and Unbranded Marketing Segment. Cost of sales for our refining and unbranded
marketing segment were $651.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $889.5
million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $238.0 million or 26.8%. This
decrease was primarily due to lower refinery throughput, partially offset by an increase in the
cost of crude oil. The average price per barrel of WTI for the three months ended June 30, 2010
increased $18.20 per barrel to an average of $77.74 per barrel, compared to an average of $59.54
per barrel for the three months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of 30.6%.
Asphalt Segment. Cost of sales for our asphalt segment were $90.3 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $107.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, a
decrease of $17.6 million or 16.3%. The decrease was due primarily to lower asphalt sales volumes
and partially offset by higher crude oil costs for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Retail and Branded Marketing Segment. Cost of sales for our retail and branded marketing
segment was $219.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $177.5 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $41.7 million or 23.5%. This increase was
primarily attributable to increases in motor fuel prices, motor fuel volume and merchandise costs.
Direct Operating Expenses
Consolidated. Direct operating expenses were $62.9 million for the three months ended June
30, 2010, compared to $71.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $8.4
million or 11.8%. This decrease was primarily due to lower throughput volumes at our refineries
for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, partially offset by
the increased cost of natural gas.
Refining and Unbranded Marketing Segment. Direct operating expenses for our refining and
unbranded marketing segment for the three months ended June 30, 2010, were $51.5 million, compared
to $61.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $10.1 million or 16.4%.
This decrease was primarily due to reduced refinery throughput volumes.
Asphalt Segment. Direct operating expenses for our asphalt segment for the three months ended
June 30, 2010, were $11.4 million, compared to $9.7 million for the three months ended June 30,
2009, an increase of $1.7 million or 17.5%. The increase is primarily due to the increased cost of
natural gas.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Consolidated. SG&A expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010, were $29.2 million,
compared to $31.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $2.4 million or
7.6%.
Refining and Unbranded Marketing Segment. SG&A expenses for our refining and unbranded
marketing segment for the three months ended June 30, 2010, were $3.9 million, compared to $7.2
million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $3.3 million or 45.8%. This
decrease is primarily due to net bad debt recoveries of $1.5 million recorded in the three months
ended June 30, 2010, and higher payroll and related costs in the three months ended June 30, 2009.
Asphalt Segment. SG&A expenses for our asphalt segment for the three months ended June 30,
2010, were $1.1 million, compared to $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009.
Retail and Branded Marketing Segment. SG&A expenses for our retail and branded marketing
segment for the three months ended June 30, 2010 were $24.0 million, compared to $23.1 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $0.9 million or 3.9%. The increase was
primarily attributable to increased payroll and related costs.
40
Table of Contents
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization for the three months ended June 30, 2010, was $25.4 million,
compared to $23.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $1.8 million or
7.6%. This increase was primarily attributable to depreciation on the increase in assets for the
Krotz Springs refinery resulting from the settlement of the earnout agreement with Valero in August
of 2009 and capital expenditures placed in service in the latter parts of 2009 and 2010 and higher
catalyst amortization in 2010.
Operating Income (Loss)
Consolidated. Operating loss for the three months ended June 30, 2010, was $27.7 million,
compared to $10.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, an increase in loss of $17.7
million. This increase was primarily due to lower throughput at our refineries, partially offset
by higher branded and retail motor fuel sales margins.
Refining and Unbranded Marketing Segment. Operating loss for our refining and unbranded
marketing segment was $35.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $17.2
million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, an increase in loss of $18.2 million. This
increase was primarily due to reduced refinery throughput due to turnaround and maintenance
activities.
Refinery operating margin at the Big Spring refinery was $9.58 per barrel for the three months
ended June 30, 2010, compared to $5.37 per barrel for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The
increase was partially due to higher industry crack spreads for the refinerys distillate products.
The Gulf Coast 3/2/1 crack spread increased 17.5% to $9.75 per barrel for the three months ended
June 30, 2010, compared to $8.30 per barrel for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Refinery
operating margin at the California refineries was $2.87 per barrel for the three months ended June
30, 2010, compared to $2.47 per barrel for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The West Coast
3/2/1 average crack spreads increased 6.8% to $15.47 per barrel for the three months ended June 30,
2010 compared to $14.48 per barrel for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The Krotz Springs
refinery operating margin for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was ($1.95) per barrel, compared
to $5.85 per barrel for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease is primarily due the
fact that the Krotz Springs refinery had been down due to a major turnaround and maintenance
activities all of 2010 until its restart in June 2010.
The increases in refining margins at our Big Spring and California refineries were in part due
to improvements in the sweet/sour and light/heavy differentials. The sweet/sour differential
increased 30.9% to $1.82 per barrel for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $1.39 per
barrel for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The light/heavy differential increased 71.9% to
$9.71 per barrel for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $5.65 per barrel for the
three months ended June 30, 2009.
Asphalt Segment. Operating income for our asphalt segment was $0.5 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2010, compared to income of $5.1 million for the three months ended June 30,
2009, a decrease of $4.6 million or 90.2%. The decrease was primarily due to lower sales volumes
for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Retail and Branded Marketing Segment. Operating income for our retail and branded marketing
segment was $7.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $2.4 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $5.3 million. This increase was primarily due to
higher branded and retail motor fuel sales margins, increased motor fuel volume and higher
merchandise sales combined with a higher profit margin.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $21.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $21.0
million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $0.7 million, or 3.3%.
41
Table of Contents
Income Tax Benefit
Income tax benefit was $17.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to
$7.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in our income tax benefit
resulted from our higher pre-tax loss in the second quarter of 2010, compared to the second quarter
of 2009 and an increase in the effective tax rate. Our effective tax rate was 35.2% for the second
quarter of 2010, compared to an effective tax rate of 33.6% for the second quarter of 2009.
Non-Controlling Interest In Loss Of Subsidiaries
Non-controlling interest in loss of subsidiaries represents the proportional share of net loss
related to non-voting common stock owned by non-controlling interests in two of our subsidiaries,
Alon Assets, Inc. and Alon USA Operating, Inc. Non-controlling interest in loss of subsidiaries
was $2.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $1.7 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $0.6 million. This increase resulted from higher net
loss for the second quarter of 2010 compared to the second quarter of 2009.
Net Loss Available to Common Stockholders
Net loss available to common stockholders was $29.3 million for the three months ended June
30, 2010, compared to $15.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $14.0
million. This increase was attributable to the factors discussed above.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Net Sales
Consolidated. Net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were $1,419.7 million,
compared to $1,828.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $408.9 million
or 22.4%. This decrease was primarily due to lower throughput at our refineries, partially offset
by higher refined product prices and higher revenues from increased retail fuel sales volumes.
Refining and Unbranded Marketing Segment. Net sales for our refining and unbranded marketing
segment were $1,174.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $1,594.4 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $420.0 million or 26.3%. The decrease in net
sales was primarily due to lower refinery throughput volumes, partially offset by higher refined
product prices.
The Big Spring and California refineries combined throughput for the six months ended June
30, 2010 averaged 61,636 bpd, consisting of an average of 42,779 bpd at the Big Spring refinery and
an average of 18,857 bpd at the California refineries compared to a combined average of 97,312 bpd
for the six months ended June 30, 2009, consisting of an average of 62,987 bpd at the Big Spring
refinery and an average of 34,325 bpd at the California refineries. The Big Spring refinery
throughput was lower as a result of efforts to rectify operational and technical matters and the
California refineries throughput was lower due to our continued efforts to optimize asphalt
production with demand. Throughput at the Krotz Springs refinery for the six months ended June 30,
2010 was an average of 11,041 bpd compared to an average of 56,099 for the six months ended June
30, 2009. The average throughput at the Krotz Springs refinery reflects only operations since its
restart in June 2010 after being down for major turnaround activity.
The increase in refined product prices that our refineries experienced resembled the price
increases experienced in each refinerys respective markets. The average price of Gulf Coast
gasoline for the six months ended June 30, 2010 increased 61.7 cpg, or 43.2%, to 204.6 cpg,
compared to 142.9 cpg for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The average Gulf Coast ultra
low-sulfur diesel price for the six months ended June 30, 2010 increased 64.7 cpg, or 44.6%, to
209.8 cpg, compared to 145.1 cpg for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The average price of West
Coast LA CARBOB gasoline for the six months ended June 30, 2010 increased 51.0 cpg, or
42
Table of Contents
30.5%, to 218.4 cpg, compared to 167.4 cpg for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The average
West Coast LA ultra low-sulfur diesel price for the six months ended June 30, 2010 increased 65.8
cpg, or 44.5%, to 213.6 cpg, compared to 147.8 cpg for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Asphalt Segment. Net sales for our asphalt segment were $172.1 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2010, compared to $176.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease
of $4.1 million or 2.3%. The decrease was due primarily to a decrease in asphalt sales volumes and
partially offset by higher asphalt sales price for the six months ended June 30, 2010. For the six
months ended June 30, 2010, the asphalt volume decreased 30.1% from 529 tons for the six months
ended June 30, 2009, to 370 tons for the six months ended June 30, 2010. For the six months ended
June 30, 2010, the average blended asphalt sales price increased 28.9% from $369.93 per ton for the
six months ended June 30, 2009, to $476.85 per ton for the six months ended June 30, 2010, and the
average non-blended asphalt sales price increased 157.9% from $135.54 per ton for the six months
ended June 30, 2009, to $349.50 per ton for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Retail and Branded Marketing Segment. Net sales for our retail and branded marketing segment
were $480.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $373.9 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009, a increase of $106.1 million or 28.4%. This increase was primarily
attributable to increases in motor fuel prices, motor fuel volume and merchandise sales.
Cost of Sales
Consolidated. Cost of sales was $1,289.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010,
compared to $1,528.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $238.2 million
or 15.6%. This decrease was primarily due to lower refinery throughput volumes at our refining and
unbranding marketing segment and lower sales volumes at our asphalt segment, partially offset by
higher crude oil prices.
Refining and Unbranded Marketing Segment. Cost of sales for our refining and unbranded
marketing segment was $1,115.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $1,358.9
million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $243.6 million or 17.9%. This
decrease was primarily due to lower refinery throughput, partially offset by an increase in the
cost of crude oil. The average price per barrel of WTI for the six months ended June 30, 2010,
increased $26.88 per barrel to an average of $78.24 per barrel, compared to an average of $51.36
per barrel for the six months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of 52.3%.
Asphalt Segment. Cost of sales for our asphalt segment were $161.7 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2010, compared to $168.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease
of $6.4 million or 3.8%. The decrease was due primarily to lower asphalt sales volumes, partially
offset by higher crude oil costs for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the six months
ended June 30, 2009.
Retail and Branded Marketing Segment. Cost of sales for our retail and branded marketing
segment was $419.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $317.0 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $102.5 million or 32.3%. This increase was
primarily attributable to increases in motor fuel prices, motor fuel volume and merchandise costs.
Direct Operating Expenses
Consolidated. Direct operating expenses were $124.4 million for the six months ended June 30,
2010, compared to $140.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $15.8
million or 11.3%. This decrease was primarily due to lower throughput volumes at our refineries
for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, partially offset by
the increased cost of natural gas.
Refining and Unbranded Marketing Segment. Direct operating expenses for our refining and
unbranded marketing segment for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were $101.8 million, compared to
$120.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $18.2 million or 15.2%. This
decrease was primarily due lower throughput volumes for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared
to the six months ended June 30, 2009.
43
Table of Contents
Asphalt Segment. Direct operating expenses for our asphalt segment for the six months ended
June 30, 2010, were $22.5 million, compared to $20.2 million for the six months ended June 30,
2009, an increase of $2.3 million or 11.4%. The increase is primarily due to the increase cost of
natural gas.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Consolidated. SG&A expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were $61.0 million,
compared to $63.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $2.5 million or 3.9
%.
Refining and Unbranded Marketing Segment. SG&A expenses for our refining and unbranded
marketing segment for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were $10.3 million, compared to $14.6
million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $4.3 million or 29.5%. The decrease
is primarily due to net bad debt recoveries of $1.5 million recorded in the six months ended June
30, 2010, and higher payroll and related costs in the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Asphalt Segment. SG&A expenses for our asphalt segment for the six months ended June 30,
2010, were $2.2 million, compared to $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Retail and Branded Marketing Segment. SG&A expenses for our retail and branded marketing
segment for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were $48.2 million, compared to $46.3 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $1.9 million or 4.1%. The increase was
primarily attributable to increased payroll and related costs.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $51.7 million,
compared to $45.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $6.0 million or
13.1%. This increase was primarily attributable to depreciation on the increase in assets for the
Krotz Springs refinery resulting from the settlement of the earnout agreement with Valero in August
of 2009 and capital expenditures placed in service in the latter parts of 2009 and the first half
of 2010 and higher catalyst amortization in 2010.
Operating Income (Loss)
Consolidated. Operating income (loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was ($106.7)
million, compared to $49.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $156.3
million. This decrease was primarily due to lower refining margins and lower refinery throughput
volumes, partially offset by higher branded motor fuel sales margins.
Refining and Unbranded Marketing Segment. Operating income (loss) for our refining and
unbranded marketing segment was ($93.9) million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to
$64.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $158.1 million. This decrease
was primarily due to lower refining margins and reduced refinery throughput due to turnaround and
maintenance activities.
Refinery operating margin at the Big Spring refinery was $7.26 per barrel for the six months
ended June 30, 2010, compared to $8.83 per barrel for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The
decrease was partially due to lower industry crack spreads for the refinerys distillate products.
The Gulf Coast 3/2/1 crack spread decreased 6.0% to $8.43 per barrel for the six months ended June
30, 2010, compared to $8.97 per barrel for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Refinery operating
margin at the California refineries was $1.29 per barrel for the six months ended June 30, 2010,
compared to $3.99 per barrel for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The West Coast 3/2/1 average
crack spreads decreased 20.9% to $12.81 per barrel for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared
to $16.19 per barrel for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The Krotz Springs refinery operating
margin for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was ($1.48) per barrel, compared to $8.91 per barrel
for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease is primarily due the fact that the Krotz
Springs refinery had been down due to a major turnaround and maintenance activities all of 2010
until its restart in June 2010.
44
Table of Contents
The decreases in refining margins at our Big Spring and California refineries were in part
offset by improvements in the sweet/sour and light/heavy differentials. The sweet/sour
differential increased 59.5% to $1.85 per barrel for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared
to $1.16 per barrel for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The light/heavy differential increased
83.3% to $9.31 per barrel for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $5.08 per barrel for
the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Asphalt Segment. Operating income (loss) for our asphalt segment was ($17.7) million for the
six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to ($17.7) million for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Retail and Branded Marketing Segment. Operating income for our retail and branded marketing
segment was $5.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $3.8 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $2.1 million. This increase was primarily due to
higher branded motor fuel sales margins, increased motor fuel volume and higher merchandise sales
combined with a higher profit margin.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $48.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $49.3
million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $1.0 million, or 2.0%. Included in
interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010 includes a charge of $6.7 million for the
write-off of debt issuance costs associated with our prepayment of the Alon Refining Krotz Springs,
Inc. revolving credit facility and the six months ended June 30, 2009 includes a charge of $5.7
million recorded related to liquidation of our heating oil hedge.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
Income tax expense (benefit) was ($51.8) million for the six months ended June 30, 2010,
compared to $3.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. This decrease resulted from our
pre-tax loss in the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to pre-tax income in the six months
ended June 30, 2009. Our effective tax rate was 37.0% for the first half of 2010, compared to an
effective tax rate of 37.8% for the first half of 2009.
Non-Controlling Interest In Loss Of Subsidiaries
Non-controlling interest in loss of subsidiaries was $6.1 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2010, compared to $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $5.5
million.
Net Income (Loss)
Net income (loss) was ($82.2) million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $2.0
million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $84.2 million. This decrease was
attributable to the factors discussed above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash on hand, cash generated from our operating
activities and borrowings under our revolving credit facilities and other credit lines. We believe
that the aforementioned sources of funds and other sources of capital available to us will be
sufficient to satisfy the anticipated cash requirements associated with our business during the
next 12 months.
On March 15, 2010, Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc. (ARKS) entered into a $65,000
short-term credit facility with Bank Hapoalim B.M. (the ARKS Term Facility). The ARKS Term
Facility as currently amended and restated matures on August 16, 2010. ARKS has agreed in principal
with Bank Hapoalim B.M. to extend the maturity date to November 15, 2010. ARKS originally borrowed
$65,000 and has repaid $35,000 as of June 30, 2010. Borrowings under the ARKS Term Facility bear
interest at LIBOR plus 3.00%
45
Table of Contents
On April 21, 2010, ARKS entered into a Supply and Offtake Agreement, which was amended on May
26, 2010 (the Supply and Offtake Agreement), with J. Aron & Company (J. Aron), the proceeds of
which allowed ARKS to retire part of its obligations under the ARKS Term Facility and support the
operation of the refinery at a minimum of 72,000 barrels per day. Pursuant to the Supply and Offtake Agreement,
(i) J. Aron agreed to sell to ARKS, and ARKS agreed to buy from J. Aron, at market price, crude oil
for processing at the Krotz Springs refinery and (ii) ARKS agreed to sell, and J. Aron agreed to
buy, at market price, certain refined products produced at the Krotz Springs refinery.
In addition, our board of directors has instructed us to pursue a rights offering of
convertible preferred shares from which we are expecting net proceeds of $40 million or more. We
have received an indication of interest from our shareholder, Alon Israel, to exercise its rights
and to invest in the rights offering up to $30 million.
Our ability to generate sufficient cash from our operating activities depends on our future
performance, which is subject to general economic, political, financial, competitive and other
factors beyond our control. In addition, our future capital expenditures and other cash
requirements could be higher than we currently expect as a result of various factors, including the
costs of such future capital expenditures related to the expansion of our business. Certain of our
credit facilities contain financial covenants for which we must maintain compliance; the most
restrictive of these covenants is contained in the Alon USA LP Credit Facility agreement which
requires a subsidiary of ours, Alon USA, Inc., to maintain a net debt to EBITDA ratio, as defined,
of no more than 4 to 1. However, this covenant is not effective until December 31, 2010.
Depending upon conditions in the capital markets and other factors, we will from time to time
consider the issuance of debt or equity securities, or other possible capital markets transactions,
the proceeds of which could be used to refinance current indebtedness, extend or replace existing
revolving credit facilities or for other corporate purposes. Pursuant to our growth strategy, we
will also consider from time to time acquisitions of, and investments in, assets or businesses that
complement our existing assets and businesses. Acquisition transactions, if any, are expected to be
financed through cash on hand and from operations, bank borrowings, the issuance of debt or equity
securities or a combination of two or more of those sources.
Cash Flows
The following table sets forth our consolidated cash flows for the six months ended June 30,
2010, and 2009:
For the Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Cash provided by (used in): |
||||||||
Operating activities |
$ | (61,560 | ) | $ | 296,964 | |||
Investing activities |
(4,056 | ) | (44,714 | ) | ||||
Financing activities |
32,892 | (227,227 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | (32,724 | ) | $ | 25,023 | |||
Cash Flows Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2010
was ($61.6) million, compared to $297.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009. The
total change in cash used in operating activities of $358.6 million is primarily attributable to
the difference of approximately $92.4 million in net income, adjusted for non-cash adjustments, and
the difference in working capital from income taxes received of approximately $47.3 million in 2010
compared to approximately $113.0 million in 2009. In addition, we received proceeds of $133.6
million from the liquidation of our heating oil crack spread hedge in 2009.
46
Table of Contents
Cash Flows Used In Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $4.1 million during the six months ended June 30,
2010, compared to $44.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009. The change in net cash
used in investing activities of $40.6 million was primarily attributable to lower 2010 capital
expenditures of $54.6 million compared to 2009, proceeds received from the sale of securities and
disposal of assets of $56.9 million in 2010, offset by $32.4 million for the Bakersfield refinery
acquisition in 2010. Cash used in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2009
included proceeds received from insurance of $34.1
million to rebuild the Big Spring refinery.
Cash Flows Provided by (Used In) Financing Activities
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities was $32.9 million during the six months
ended June 30, 2010, compared to ($227.2) million during the six months ended June 30, 2009. The
net change in cash provided by (used in) financing activities is primarily attributable to
additions to short-term financing of $41.5 million through the Term Loan Credit Facility and proceeds received of $45.8 million from the Supply and Offtake
Agreement, as well as lower payments of $47.3 million on our long-term debt and revolving credit
facilities in 2010 compared to repayments of $219.2 million in 2009.
Indebtedness
Alon USA Energy, Inc. Credit Facilities
Term Loan Credit Facility. We have a term loan (the Alon Energy Term Loan) that will mature
on August 2, 2013. Principal payments of $4.5 million per annum are paid in quarterly installments,
subject to reduction from mandatory events.
Borrowings under the Alon Energy Term Loan bear interest at a rate based on a margin over the
Eurodollar rate from between 1.75% to 2.50% per annum based upon the ratings of the loans by
Standard & Poors Rating Service and Moodys Investors Service, Inc. Currently, the margin is 2.25%
over the Eurodollar rate.
The Alon Energy Term Loan is jointly and severally guaranteed by all of our subsidiaries
except for our retail subsidiaries, those subsidiaries established in conjunction with the Krotz
Springs refinery acquisition and certain subsidiaries established in conjunction with the
Bakersfield refinery acquisition. The Alon Energy Term Loan is secured by a second lien on cash,
accounts receivable and inventory and a first lien on most of our remaining assets excluding those
of our retail subsidiaries, those subsidiaries established in conjunction with the Krotz Springs
refinery acquisition and certain subsidiaries established in conjunction with the Bakersfield
refinery acquisition.
The Alon Energy Term Loan contains customary restrictive covenants, such as restrictions on
liens, mergers, consolidations, sales of assets, additional indebtedness, different businesses,
certain lease obligations, and certain restricted payments. The Alon Energy Term Loan does not
contain any maintenance financial covenants.
At June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, the Alon Energy Term Loan had an outstanding balance
of $432.0 million and $434.3 million, respectively.
47
Table of Contents
Letters of Credit Facility. On March 9, 2010, we entered into an unsecured credit facility
with Israel Discount Bank of New York (the Alon Energy Letters of Credit Facility) for the
issuance of letters of credit in an amount not to exceed $60.0 million and with a sub-limit for
borrowings not to exceed $30.0 million. This facility will terminate on January 31, 2013. On June
30, 2010, we had $60.0 million of outstanding letters of credit under this facility. Borrowings
under this facility bear interest at the Eurodollar rate plus 3.00% per annum subject to an overall
minimum interest rate of 4.00%.
This facility contains certain customary restrictive covenants including financial covenants.
Certain of these covenants become applicable at September 30, 2010, while others first apply at
December 31, 2010.
Alon USA LP Credit Facility
Revolving Credit Facility. We have a $240.0 million revolving credit facility (the Alon USA
LP Credit Facility) that will mature on January 1, 2013. The Alon USA LP Credit Facility can be
used both for borrowings and the issuance of letters of credit, subject to a limit of the lesser of
the facility or the amount of the borrowing base under the facility.
Borrowings under the Alon USA LP Credit Facility bear interest at the Eurodollar rate plus
3.00% per annum subject to an overall minimum interest rate of 4.00%.
The Alon USA LP Credit Facility is secured by (i) a first lien on our cash, accounts
receivables, inventories and related assets and (ii) a second lien on our fixed assets and other
specified property, in each case, excluding those of Alon Paramount Holdings, Inc. (Alon
Holdings), and its subsidiaries other than Alon Pipeline Logistics, LLC (Alon Logistics), the
subsidiaries established in conjunction with the Krotz Springs refinery acquisition, the
subsidiaries established in conjunction with the Bakersfield refinery acquisition and our retail
subsidiaries.
The Alon USA LP Credit Facility contains certain restrictive covenants including maintenance
financial covenants. As currently amended, the maintenance financial covenants for the leverage
ratio and the interest coverage ratio will not apply until the fiscal quarter ending December 31,
2010. The maintenance financial covenant for the current ratio will continue to be measured for
all fiscal quarters of 2010.
Borrowings of $119.0 million and $88.0 million were outstanding under the Alon USA LP Credit
Facility at June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, respectively. At June 30, 2010, and December 31,
2009, outstanding letters of credit under the Alon USA LP Credit Facility were $120.0 million and
$129.0 million, respectively.
Paramount Petroleum Corporation Credit Facility
Revolving Credit Facility. Paramount Petroleum Corporation has a $300.0 million revolving
credit facility (the Paramount Credit Facility) that will mature on February 28, 2012. The
Paramount Credit Facility can be used both for borrowings and the issuance of letters of credit
subject to a limit of the lesser of the facility or the amount of the borrowing base under the
facility.
Borrowings under the Paramount Credit Facility bear interest at the Eurodollar rate plus a
margin based on excess availability. The average excess availability during June 2010 was $62.4
million and the margin was 1.75%.
The Paramount Credit Facility is primarily secured by (i) a first lien on accounts
receivables, inventories and related assets and (ii) a second lien on Alon Holdings (excluding
Alon Logistics) fixed assets and other specified property.
The Paramount Credit Facility contains certain restrictive covenants related to working
capital, operations and other matters.
48
Table of Contents
Borrowings of $55.8 million and $45.3 million were outstanding under the Paramount Credit
Facility at June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, respectively. At June 30, 2010, and December 31,
2009, outstanding letters of credit under the Paramount Credit Facility were $63.0 million and
$18.0 million, respectively.
Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc. Credit Facilities
Senior Secured Notes. In October 2009, Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc. (ARKS) issued
$216.5 million in aggregate principal amount of 13.50% senior secured notes (the Senior Secured
Notes) in a private offering. The Senior Secured Notes were issued at an offering price of
94.857%. The Senior Secured Notes will mature on October 15, 2014 and the entire principal amount
is due at maturity. Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15.
ARKS received gross proceeds of $205,365 from the sale of the Senior Secured Notes (before
fees and expenses related to the offering). In connection with the closing, ARKS prepaid in full
all outstanding obligations under its term loan. The remaining proceeds from the offering were used
for general corporate purposes.
The terms of the Senior Secured Notes are governed by an indenture (the Indenture) and the
obligations under the Indenture are secured by a first priority lien on ARKS property, plant and
equipment and a second priority lien on ARKS cash, accounts receivable and inventory.
The Indenture also contains restrictive covenants such as restrictions on loans, mergers,
sales of assets, additional indebtedness and restricted payments. The Indenture does not contain any maintenance financial covenants.
On February 17, 2010, ARKS exchanged $216.5 million of Senior Secured Notes for an equivalent
amount of Senior Secured Notes (Exchange Notes) registered under the Securities Act of 1933. The
Exchange Notes are substantially identical to the Senior Secured Notes, except that the Exchange
Notes have been registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not subject to
transfer restrictions.
At June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, the Senior Secured Notes had an outstanding balance
(net of unamortized discount) of $206.5 million and $205.7 million, respectively. Alon is utilizing
the effective interest method to amortize the original issue discount over the life of the Senior
Secured Notes.
Short-Term Credit Facility. On March 15, 2010, ARKS entered into a $65.0 million short-term
credit facility with Bank Hapoalim B.M. (the ARKS Term Facility). The ARKS Term Facility as
currently amended and restated matures on August 16, 2010. ARKS has agreed in principal with Bank
Hapoalim B.M. to extend the maturity date to November 15, 2010. ARKS originally borrowed $65.0
million and has repaid $35.0 million as of June 30, 2010.
Borrowings under the ARKS Term Facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 3.00% and $30.0 million
was outstanding under the ARKS Term Facility at June 30, 2010.
The ARKS Term Facility is secured by a second lien on all assets other than cash, accounts
receivable, and inventory of ARKS.
The ARKS Term Facility contains customary restrictive covenants, such as restrictions on
liens, mergers, consolidation, sales of assets, capital expenditures, additional indebtedness,
investments, hedging transactions, and certain restricted payments.
Revolving Credit Facility. On March 15, 2010, ARKS terminated its revolving credit facility
agreement (the ARKS Facility) and repaid all outstanding amounts thereunder. As a result of the
prepayment of the ARKS Facility, we recorded a write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs of $6.7
million as interest expense in the first quarter of 2010.
Borrowings of $83.3 million and outstanding letters of credit of $2.8 million were outstanding
under the ARKS Facility at December 31, 2009.
49
Table of Contents
Alon Bakersfield Operating, Inc. Credit Facility
Short-Term Credit Facility. On June 1, 2010, Alon Bakersfield Operating, Inc., our
wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into an $11.5 million secured credit facility with Bank Leumi USA
as lender. The facility is secured primarily by the hydrocarbon inventories acquired in the
Bakersfield refinery acquisition. The facility will mature on September 1, 2010. The principal is
to be repaid in a single payment on the maturity date, subject to reductions from mandatory
prepayment events. Borrowings under the facility bear interest at the Eurodollar rate plus 3.00%
per annum, subject to an overall minimum interest rate floor of 4.00% per annum.
Borrowings of $11.5 million were outstanding under the facility at June 30, 2010.
The facility contains customary covenants, such as restriction on liens, mergers,
consolidations, sales of assets, additional indebtedness and different businesses. This facility
does not contain any maintenance financial covenants.
Retail Credit Facilities
Southwest Convenience Stores, LLC (SCS) is a party to a credit agreement (the SCS Credit
Agreement) that matures on July 1, 2017. Monthly principal payments are based on a 15-year
amortization term.
Borrowings under the SCS Credit Agreement bear interest at a Eurodollar rate plus 1.50% per
annum.
Obligations under the SCS Credit Agreement are jointly and severally guaranteed by us, Alon
Brands, Inc., Skinnys, LLC and all of the subsidiaries of SCS. The obligations under the SCS
Credit Agreement are secured by a pledge of substantially all of the assets of SCS and Skinnys,
LLC and each of their subsidiaries, including cash, accounts receivable and inventory.
The SCS Credit Agreement contains customary restrictive covenants on its activities, such as
restrictions on liens, mergers, consolidations, sales of assets, additional indebtedness,
investments, certain lease obligations and certain restricted payments. The SCS Credit Agreement
also includes one annual financial covenant.
At June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, the SCS Credit Agreement had an outstanding balance
of $76.5 million and $79.7 million, respectively, and there were no further amounts available for
borrowing.
Other Retail Related Credit Facilities
In 2003, Alon obtained $1.5 million in mortgage loans to finance the acquisition of new retail
locations. The interest rates on these loans ranged between 5.5% and 9.7%, with 5 to 15-year
payment terms. At June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, the outstanding balances were $0.8 million
and $0.8 million, respectively.
Capital Spending
Each year our Board of Directors approves capital projects, including regulatory and planned
turnaround projects that our management is authorized to undertake in our annual capital budget.
Additionally, at times when conditions warrant or as new opportunities arise, other projects or the
expansion of existing projects may be approved. Our updated total capital expenditure and
turnaround/chemical catalyst budget for 2010 is $45.3 million, of which $20.1 million is related to
regulatory and compliance projects, $22.7 million is related to turnaround and chemical catalyst,
and $2.5 million is related to various improvement and sustaining projects. Approximately $24.2
million has been spent as of June 30, 2010.
Turnaround and Chemical Catalyst Costs. We expect to spend approximately $22.7 million during
2010 relating to turnaround and chemical catalyst. Approximately $11.5 million has been spent as
of June 30, 2010 compared to $10.3 million for the same period in 2009.
50
Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
There have been no material changes outside the ordinary course of business from our
contractual obligations and commercial commitments detailed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements.
Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP. In order to apply
these principles, we must make judgments, assumptions and estimates based on the best available
information at the time. Actual results may differ based on the accuracy of the information
utilized and subsequent events, some of which we may have little or no control over.
Our critical accounting policies are described under the caption Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsCritical Accounting Policies in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Certain critical accounting
policies that materially affect the amounts recorded in our consolidated financial statements are
the use of the LIFO method for valuing certain inventories and the deferral and subsequent
amortization of costs associated with major turnarounds and chemical catalysts replacements. No
significant changes to these accounting policies have occurred subsequent to December 31, 2009.
New Accounting Standards and Disclosures
New accounting standards are disclosed in Note 1(c) Basis of Presentation and Certain
Significant Accounting PoliciesNew Accounting Standards included in the consolidated financial
statements included in Item 1 of this report.
51
Table of Contents
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Changes in commodity prices, purchased fuel prices and interest rates are our primary sources
of market risk. Our risk management committee oversees all activities associated with the
identification, assessment and management of our market risk exposure.
Commodity Price Risk
We are exposed to market risks related to the volatility of crude oil and refined product
prices, as well as volatility in the price of natural gas used in our refinery operations. Our
financial results can be affected significantly by fluctuations in these prices, which depend on
many factors, including demand for crude oil, gasoline and other refined products, changes in the
economy, worldwide production levels, worldwide inventory levels and governmental regulatory
initiatives. Our risk management strategy identifies circumstances in which we may utilize the
commodity futures market to manage risk associated with these price fluctuations.
In order to manage the uncertainty relating to inventory price volatility, we have
consistently applied a policy of maintaining inventories at or below a targeted operating level.
In the past, circumstances have occurred, such as timing of crude oil cargo deliveries, turnaround
schedules or shifts in market demand that have resulted in variances between our actual inventory
level and our desired target level. Upon the review and approval of our risk management committee,
we may utilize the commodity futures market to manage these anticipated inventory variances.
We maintain inventories of crude oil, refined products, asphalt and blendstocks, the values of
which are subject to wide fluctuations in market prices driven by world economic conditions,
regional and global inventory levels and seasonal conditions. As of June 30, 2010, we held
approximately 2.7 million barrels of crude oil, refined product and asphalt inventories valued
under the LIFO valuation method with an average cost of $39.01 per barrel. Market value exceeded
carrying value of LIFO costs by $104.4 million. We refer to this excess as our LIFO reserve. If
the market value of these inventories had been $1.00 per barrel lower, our LIFO reserve would have
been reduced by $2.7 million.
In accordance with fair value provisions of ASC 825-10, all commodity futures contracts are
recorded at fair value and any changes in fair value between periods is recorded in the profit and
loss section of our consolidated financial statements. Forwards represent physical trades for
which pricing and quantities have been set, but the physical product delivery has not occurred by
the end of the reporting period. Futures represent trades which have been executed on the New
York Mercantile Exchange which have not been closed or settled at the end of the reporting period.
A long represents an obligation to purchase product and a short represents an obligation to
sell product.
52
Table of Contents
The following table provides information about our derivative commodity instruments as of
June 30, 2010:
Description | Wtd Avg Purchase | Wtd Avg Sales | Market | Gain | ||||||||||||||||||||
of Activity | Contract Volume | Price/BBL | Price/BBL | Contract Value | Value | (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forwards-long (Diesel) |
10,908 | $ | 85.58 | $ | | $ | 934 | $ | 880 | $ | (54 | ) | ||||||||||||
Forwards-short (Diesel) |
(260,943 | ) | | 85.45 | (22,297 | ) | (21,362 | ) | 935 | |||||||||||||||
Forwards-short (Crude) |
(84,000 | ) | | 76.92 | (6,461 | ) | (6,353 | ) | 108 | |||||||||||||||
Description | Wtd Avg Contract | Wtd Avg Market | Market | Gain | ||||||||||||||||||||
of Activity | Contract Volume | Price/Oz | Price/Oz | Contract Value | Value | (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Futures-short (Platinum) |
(2,846 | ) | $ | 1,480.00 | $ | 1,542.30 | $ | (4,212 | ) | $ | (4,389 | ) | $ | (177 | ) | |||||||||
Futures-short (Palladium) |
(2,534 | ) | 436.00 | 445.85 | (1,105 | ) | (1,130 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Description | Wtd Avg Contract | Wtd Avg Market | Market | Gain | ||||||||||||||||||||
of Activity | Contract Volume | Spread | Spread | Contract Value | Value | (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Futures-crack spread
(Heating oil) |
292,400 | $ | 11.84 | $ | 10.46 | $ | 3,463 | $ | 3,059 | $ | (404 | ) | ||||||||||||
Futures-call options (Heating oil) |
(3,514,500 | ) | 13.24 | 13.26 | (46,535 | ) | (46,595 | ) | (60 | ) |
Interest Rate Risk
As of June 30, 2010, $529.0 million of our outstanding debt was at floating interest rates out
of which approximately $119.0 million was at the Eurodollar rate plus 3.00%, subject to a minimum
interest rate of 4.00%. As of June 30, 2010, we had interest rate swap agreements with a notional
amount of $350.0 million with remaining periods ranging from less than a year to three years and
fixed interest rates ranging from 4.25% to 4.75%. An increase of 1% in the Eurodollar rate on
indebtedness, net of the weighted average notional amount of the interest rate swap agreements
outstanding in 2010 and the instrument subject to the minimum interest rate, would result in an
increase in our interest expense of approximately $4.5 million per year.
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
(1) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
Our management has evaluated, with the participation of our principal executive and principal
financial officers, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule
13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end
of the period covered by this report, and has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in
the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and
forms including, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal
financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
53
Table of Contents
(2) Changes in internal control over financial reporting.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as described in
Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
54
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
WE MAY INCUR SIGNIFICANT COSTS TO COMPLY WITH NEW OR CHANGING ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND
REGULATIONS.
Our operations are subject to extensive regulatory controls on air emissions, water
discharges, waste management and the clean-up of contamination that can require costly compliance
measures. If we fail to meet environmental requirements, we may be subject to administrative, civil
and criminal proceedings by state and federal authorities, as well as civil proceedings by
environmental groups and other individuals, which could result in substantial fines and penalties
against us as well as governmental or court orders that could alter, limit or stop our operations.
For example, on February 2, 2007, we committed in writing to enter into discussions with the
EPA under the National Petroleum Refinery Initiative. To date, the EPA has not made any specific
findings against us or any of our refineries and we have not determined whether we will ultimately
enter into a settlement agreement with the EPA. Based on prior settlements that the EPA has reached
with other petroleum refiners under the Petroleum Refinery Initiative, we anticipate that the EPA
will seek relief in the form of the payment of civil penalties, the installation of air pollution
controls and the implementation of environmentally beneficial projects. At this time, we cannot
estimate the amount of any such civil penalties or the costs of any required controls or
environmentally beneficial projects.
Additionally, in 2010 our Big Spring refinery was one of more than 100 facilities in Texas to
receive a Clean Air Act request for information from the EPA relating to the EPAs disapproval of
Texas flexible permitting rule. According to the EPA, the Texas flexible permit rule was
never approved by the EPA for inclusion in the Texas state clean-air implementation plan and,
therefore, emission limitations in Texas flexible permits are not federally enforceable. The EPA
indicated that it would consider enforcement against holders of flexible permits that failed to
comply with applicable federal requirements on a case-by-case basis. At this time, it is unclear
whether we will become the target of EPA enforcement, whether we will have any obligation to
install new controls or whether or how we will be required to revise our current permit for the Big
Spring refinery or obtain new permit limits to address any alleged permitting deficiencies.
New laws and regulations, new interpretations of existing laws and regulations, increased
governmental enforcement or other developments could require us to make additional unforeseen
expenditures. Many of these laws and regulations are becoming increasingly stringent, and the cost
of compliance with these requirements can be expected to increase over time. We are not able to
predict the impact of new or changed laws or regulations or changes in the ways that such laws or
regulations are administered, interpreted or enforced. The requirements to be met, as well as the
technology and length of time available to meet those requirements, continue to develop and change.
To the extent that the costs associated with meeting any of these requirements are substantial and
not adequately provided for, our results of operations and cash flows could suffer.
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS |
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description of Exhibit | |
3.1
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Alon USA Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form S-1, filed by the Company on July 7, 2005, SEC File No. 333-124797). | |
3.2
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Alon USA Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form S-1, filed by the Company on July 14, 2005, SEC File No. 333-124797). | |
4.1
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form S-1, filed by the Company on June 17, 2005, SEC File No. 333-124797). |
55
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description of Exhibit | |
4.2
|
Indenture, dated as of October 22, 2009, by and among Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc. and Wilmington Trust FSB, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K, filed by the Company on October 23, 2009, SEC File No. 001-32567). | |
10.1
|
Seventh Amendment to Amended Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2010, by and among Alon USA, LP, Israel Discount Bank of New York, Bank Leumi USA and certain other guarantor companies and financial institutions from time to time named therein. | |
10.2
|
Eighth Amendment to Amended Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2010, by and among Alon USA, LP, Israel Discount Bank of New York, Bank Leumi USA and certain other guarantor companies and financial institutions from time to time named therein. | |
10.3
|
Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement, dated May 28, 2010, among Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc., each other party joined as a borrower thereunder from time to time, the Lenders party thereto, and Bank Hapoalim B.M., as Administrative Agent. | |
10.4
|
Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement, dated June 15, 2010, among Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc., each other party joined as a borrower thereunder from time to time, the Lenders party thereto, and Bank Hapoalim B.M., as Administrative Agent. | |
10.5
|
Credit Agreement, dated May 28, 2010, by and between Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc. and Goldman Sachs Bank USA, as Issuing Bank. | |
10.6
|
Amended and Restated Supply and Offtake Agreement, dated May 26, 2010 by and between Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc. and J. Aron & Company. | |
31.1
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
56
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Alon USA Energy, Inc. |
||||
Date: August 6, 2010 | By: | /s/ David Wiessman | ||
David Wiessman | ||||
Executive Chairman | ||||
Date: August 6, 2010 | By: | /s/ Jeff D. Morris | ||
Jeff D. Morris | ||||
Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Date: August 6, 2010 | By: | /s/ Shai Even | ||
Shai Even | ||||
Chief Financial Officer |
57
Table of Contents
EXHIBITS
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description of Exhibit | |
3.1
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Alon USA Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form S-1, filed by the Company on July 7, 2005, SEC File No. 333-124797). | |
3.2
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Alon USA Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form S-1, filed by the Company on July 14, 2005, SEC File No. 333-124797). | |
4.1
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form S-1, filed by the Company on June 17, 2005, SEC File No. 333-124797). | |
4.2
|
Indenture, dated as of October 22, 2009, by and among Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc. and Wilmington Trust FSB, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K, filed by the Company on October 23, 2009, SEC File No. 001-32567). | |
10.1
|
Seventh Amendment to Amended Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2010, by and among Alon USA, LP, Israel Discount Bank of New York, Bank Leumi USA and certain other guarantor companies and financial institutions from time to time named therein. | |
10.2
|
Eighth Amendment to Amended Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2010, by and among Alon USA, LP, Israel Discount Bank of New York, Bank Leumi USA and certain other guarantor companies and financial institutions from time to time named therein. | |
10.3
|
Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement, dated May 28, 2010, among Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc., each other party joined as a borrower thereunder from time to time, the Lenders party thereto, and Bank Hapoalim B.M., as Administrative Agent. | |
10.4
|
Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement, dated June 15, 2010, among Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc., each other party joined as a borrower thereunder from time to time, the Lenders party thereto, and Bank Hapoalim B.M., as Administrative Agent. | |
10.5
|
Credit Agreement, dated May 28, 2010, by and between Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc. and Goldman Sachs Bank USA, as Issuing Bank. | |
10.6
|
Amended and Restated Supply and Offtake Agreement, dated May 26, 2010 by and between Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc. and J. Aron & Company. | |
31.1
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
58