Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - NATIONAL BANK OF INDIANAPOLIS CORP | c04453exv31w2.htm |
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - NATIONAL BANK OF INDIANAPOLIS CORP | c04453exv32w1.htm |
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - NATIONAL BANK OF INDIANAPOLIS CORP | c04453exv32w2.htm |
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - NATIONAL BANK OF INDIANAPOLIS CORP | c04453exv31w1.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number: 000-21671
THE NATIONAL BANK OF INDIANAPOLIS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Indiana (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
35-1887991 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
107 North Pennsylvania Street Indianapolis, Indiana (Address of principal executive offices) |
46204 (Zip Code) |
(317) 261-9000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or
such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
Common Stock | Outstanding at August 6, 2010 | |
[Common Stock, no par value per share] | 2,318,367 |
Table of Contents
The National Bank of Indianapolis Corporation
The National Bank of Indianapolis Corporation
Report on Form 10-Q
for Quarter Ended
June 30, 2010
for Quarter Ended
June 30, 2010
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||||||||
Item 1. | ||||||||
1 | ||||||||
2 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
Item 2. | 16 | |||||||
Item 3. | 29 | |||||||
Item 4. | 30 | |||||||
PART II OTHER INFORMATION | ||||||||
Item 1. | 30 | |||||||
Item 1A. | 30 | |||||||
Item 2. | 31 | |||||||
Item 3. | 32 | |||||||
Item 4. | 32 | |||||||
Item 5. | 32 | |||||||
Item 6. | 32 | |||||||
34 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.2 |
Table of Contents
Part I Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
The National Bank of Indianapolis Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited, Dollars in thousands except share data)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited, Dollars in thousands except share data)
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 166,140 | $ | 149,375 | ||||
Reverse repurchase agreements |
1,000 | 1,000 | ||||||
Federal funds sold |
13,631 | 1,242 | ||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
180,771 | 151,617 | ||||||
Investment securities |
||||||||
Available-for-sale securities |
74,758 | 67,296 | ||||||
Held-to-maturity securities (Fair value of $100,031 at
June 30, 2010 and $96,588 at December 31, 2009) |
97,009 | 94,922 | ||||||
Total investment securities |
171,767 | 162,218 | ||||||
Loans held for sale |
10,337 | 884 | ||||||
Loans |
878,583 | 863,838 | ||||||
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
(15,523 | ) | (13,716 | ) | ||||
Net loans |
863,060 | 850,122 | ||||||
Premises and equipment |
24,122 | 24,532 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset |
7,909 | 7,133 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
4,126 | 4,199 | ||||||
Federal Reserve and FHLB stock |
3,150 | 3,150 | ||||||
Other real estate owned |
6,370 | 8,432 | ||||||
Other assets |
21,108 | 21,343 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,292,720 | $ | 1,233,630 | ||||
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits |
$ | 197,208 | $ | 192,705 | ||||
Money market and savings deposits |
704,277 | 650,353 | ||||||
Time deposits over $100,000 |
126,135 | 131,938 | ||||||
Other time deposits |
79,581 | 77,069 | ||||||
Total deposits |
1,107,201 | 1,052,065 | ||||||
Other short term borrowings |
80,258 | 81,314 | ||||||
FHLB advances |
| | ||||||
Short term debt |
4,013 | 4,138 | ||||||
Subordinated debt |
5,000 | 5,000 | ||||||
Junior subordinated debentures owed to unconsolidated subsidiary trust |
13,918 | 13,918 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
6,425 | 4,164 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
1,216,815 | 1,160,599 | ||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value authorized 5,000,000 shares |
| | ||||||
Common stock, no par value authorized 15,000,000 shares
issued 2,858,994 shares at June 30, 2010 and 2,840,382
shares at December 31, 2009 |
35,021 | 34,440 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost; 543,174 shares at June 30, 2010
and 533,204 shares at December 31, 2009 |
(20,726 | ) | (20,346 | ) | ||||
Additional paid in capital |
11,700 | 10,873 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
49,525 | 48,067 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
385 | (3 | ) | |||||
Total shareholders equity |
75,905 | 73,031 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 1,292,720 | $ | 1,233,630 | ||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
The National Bank of Indianapolis Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited, Dollars in thousands except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited, Dollars in thousands except per share data)
Three months ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||
Interest and fees on loans |
$ | 10,529 | $ | 10,431 | ||||
Interest on investment securities taxable |
536 | 789 | ||||||
Interest on investment securities nontaxable |
527 | 521 | ||||||
Interest on federal funds sold |
4 | 1 | ||||||
Interest on due from banks |
90 | 53 | ||||||
Total interest income |
11,686 | 11,795 | ||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||
Interest on deposits |
1,808 | 2,359 | ||||||
Interest on other short term borrowings |
73 | 55 | ||||||
Interest on short term debt |
47 | 21 | ||||||
Interest on long term debt |
388 | 399 | ||||||
Total interest expense |
2,316 | 2,834 | ||||||
Net interest income |
9,370 | 8,961 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
1,234 | 2,650 | ||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
8,136 | 6,311 | ||||||
Other operating income: |
||||||||
Wealth management fees |
1,467 | 1,336 | ||||||
Rental income |
76 | 79 | ||||||
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts |
749 | 756 | ||||||
Mortgage banking income |
268 | 647 | ||||||
Interchange income |
314 | 243 | ||||||
Net loss on sale of securities |
(5 | ) | | |||||
Other |
438 | 508 | ||||||
Total other operating income |
3,307 | 3,569 | ||||||
Other operating expenses: |
||||||||
Salaries, wages and employee benefits |
6,179 | 5,403 | ||||||
Occupancy |
647 | 641 | ||||||
Furniture and equipment |
330 | 355 | ||||||
Professional services |
554 | 427 | ||||||
Data processing |
802 | 689 | ||||||
Business development |
459 | 417 | ||||||
FDIC Insurance |
501 | 942 | ||||||
Non performing assets |
147 | 264 | ||||||
Other |
845 | 922 | ||||||
Total other operating expenses |
10,464 | 10,060 | ||||||
Income before tax |
979 | (180 | ) | |||||
Federal and state income tax (benefit) |
143 | (259 | ) | |||||
Net income |
$ | 836 | $ | 79 | ||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.36 | $ | 0.03 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.03 | ||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
The National Bank of Indianapolis Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited, Dollars in thousands except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited, Dollars in thousands except per share data)
Six months ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||
Interest and fees on loans |
$ | 20,986 | $ | 20,676 | ||||
Interest on investment securities taxable |
1,119 | 1,661 | ||||||
Interest on investment securities nontaxable |
1,015 | 1,044 | ||||||
Interest on federal funds sold |
5 | 3 | ||||||
Interest on due from banks |
176 | 76 | ||||||
Total interest income |
23,301 | 23,460 | ||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||
Interest on deposits |
3,696 | 5,062 | ||||||
Interest on other short term borrowings |
144 | 85 | ||||||
Interest on short term debt |
94 | 42 | ||||||
Interest on long term debt |
776 | 802 | ||||||
Total interest expense |
4,710 | 5,991 | ||||||
Net interest income |
18,591 | 17,469 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
2,469 | 3,900 | ||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
16,122 | 13,569 | ||||||
Other operating income: |
||||||||
Wealth management fees |
2,671 | 2,421 | ||||||
Rental income |
145 | 185 | ||||||
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts |
1,518 | 1,524 | ||||||
Mortgage banking income |
480 | 949 | ||||||
Interchange income |
598 | 453 | ||||||
Net loss on sale of securities |
(5 | ) | | |||||
Other |
833 | 1,040 | ||||||
Total other operating income |
6,240 | 6,572 | ||||||
Other operating expenses: |
||||||||
Salaries, wages and employee benefits |
12,113 | 10,757 | ||||||
Occupancy |
1,288 | 1,232 | ||||||
Furniture and equipment |
659 | 700 | ||||||
Professional services |
1,143 | 932 | ||||||
Data processing |
1,527 | 1,399 | ||||||
Business development |
890 | 826 | ||||||
FDIC Insurance |
1,035 | 1,297 | ||||||
Non performing assets |
304 | 285 | ||||||
Other |
1,727 | 1,842 | ||||||
Total other operating expenses |
20,686 | 19,270 | ||||||
Income before tax |
1,676 | 871 | ||||||
Federal and state income tax (benefit) |
218 | (53 | ) | |||||
Net income |
$ | 1,458 | $ | 924 | ||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.63 | $ | 0.40 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.62 | $ | 0.40 | ||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
The National Bank of Indianapolis Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited, Dollars in thousands)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited, Dollars in thousands)
Six months ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Operating Activities |
||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 1,458 | $ | 924 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided (used) by operating activities: |
||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
2,469 | 3,900 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of loans |
25,325 | 40,107 | ||||||
Origination of loans held for sale |
(17,972 | ) | (39,138 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
757 | 770 | ||||||
Fair value adjustment on mortgage servicing rights |
438 | 141 | ||||||
Loss on sales of investment securities available for sale |
5 | | ||||||
Gain on sale of loans |
(714 | ) | (927 | ) | ||||
Net gain on sales and writedowns of other real estate and
repossessions |
(75 | ) | 74 | |||||
Net increase in deferred income taxes |
(1,031 | ) | (778 | ) | ||||
Net increase in bank owned life insurance |
(194 | ) | (211 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefit from deferred stock compensation |
(50 | ) | (400 | ) | ||||
Net accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on
investments |
568 | 110 | ||||||
Compensation expense related to restricted stock and options |
866 | 705 | ||||||
Changes in: |
||||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
73 | 201 | ||||||
Other assets |
(8 | ) | (1,979 | ) | ||||
Changes in: |
||||||||
Other liabilities |
2,311 | 4,516 | ||||||
Net cash provided provided by operating activities |
14,226 | 8,015 | ||||||
Investing Activities |
||||||||
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities held to maturity |
13,292 | 11,077 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities available for sale |
5,500 | 10,000 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of investment securities held to maturity |
477 | | ||||||
Purchases of investment securities held to maturity |
(16,057 | ) | | |||||
Purchases of investment securities available for sale |
(12,692 | ) | (15,601 | ) | ||||
Net increase in loans |
(32,321 | ) | (5,628 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of other real estate and repossessions |
2,959 | 1,170 | ||||||
Purchases of bank premises and equipment |
(347 | ) | (1,097 | ) | ||||
Net cash used by investing activities |
(39,189 | ) | (79 | ) | ||||
Financing Activities |
||||||||
Net increase in deposits |
55,136 | 61,428 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in short term borrowings |
(1,056 | ) | 19,744 | |||||
Net change in revolving line of credit |
(125 | ) | | |||||
Income tax benefit from deferred stock compensation |
50 | 400 | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of stock |
492 | 1,057 | ||||||
Repurchase of stock |
(380 | ) | (1,713 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
54,117 | 80,916 | ||||||
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
29,154 | 88,852 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
151,617 | 31,420 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
$ | 180,771 | $ | 120,272 | ||||
Interest paid |
$ | 4,835 | $ | 5,851 | ||||
Income taxes paid |
$ | 837 | $ | 26 | ||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
The National Bank of Indianapolis Corporation
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders Equity
(Unaudited, Dollars in thousands except share data)
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders Equity
(Unaudited, Dollars in thousands except share data)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Treasury | Paid In | Retained | Comprehensive | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Stock | Capital | Earnings | Income | TOTAL | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
$ | 33,136 | $ | (18,481 | ) | $ | 8,766 | $ | 47,955 | $ | 836 | $ | 72,212 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 924 | | 924 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized loss
on investments, net
of tax of $355 |
| | | | (551 | ) | (551 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
373 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit from deferred stock compensation |
| | 400 | | | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of stock 54,700 shares of common stock under
stock-based compensation plans |
1,062 | | (5 | ) | | | 1,057 | |||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of stock 45,184 shares of common stock |
| (1,713 | ) | | | | (1,713 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation earned |
| | 705 | | | 705 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
$ | 34,198 | $ | (20,194 | ) | $ | 9,866 | $ | 48,879 | $ | 285 | $ | 73,034 | |||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
$ | 34,440 | $ | (20,346 | ) | $ | 10,873 | $ | 48,067 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 73,031 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 1,458 | | 1,458 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gain
on investments, net
of tax of $255 |
| | | | 388 | 388 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
1,846 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit from deferred stock compensation |
| | 50 | | | 50 | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of 18,611 shares of common stock under
stock-based compensation plans |
581 | | (89 | ) | | | 492 | |||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of 9,969 shares of common stock |
| (380 | ) | | | | (380 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation earned |
| | 866 | | | 866 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
$ | 35,021 | $ | (20,726 | ) | $ | 11,700 | $ | 49,525 | $ | 385 | $ | 75,905 | |||||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
The National Bank of Indianapolis Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
($ in thousands, except share and per share data)
($ in thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 1: Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The
National Bank of Indianapolis Corporation (Corporation) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, The
National Bank of Indianapolis (Bank). All intercompany transactions between the Corporation and
its subsidiary have been properly eliminated. The consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for
interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation
S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered
necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the six month period
ended June 30, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the
year ended December 31, 2010. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial
statements and footnotes thereto included in the Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
Note 2: Investment Securities
The following is a summary of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities:
Gross | Gross | Estimated | ||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gain | Loss | Value | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities |
$ | 7,696 | $ | 2 | $ | | $ | 7,698 | ||||||||
U.S. Government agencies |
66,424 | 636 | | 67,060 | ||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale |
$ | 74,120 | $ | 638 | $ | | $ | 74,758 | ||||||||
Held-to-maturity |
||||||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
$ | 60,315 | $ | 2,380 | $ | 86 | $ | 62,609 | ||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations,
residential |
32,764 | 705 | 32 | 33,437 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage backed securities, residential |
3,780 | 55 | | 3,835 | ||||||||||||
Other securities |
150 | | | 150 | ||||||||||||
Total Held-to-maturity |
$ | 97,009 | $ | 3,140 | $ | 118 | $ | 100,031 | ||||||||
Gross | Gross | Estimated | ||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gain | Loss | Value | |||||||||||||
December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities |
$ | 506 | $ | | $ | | $ | 506 | ||||||||
U.S. Government agencies |
66,795 | 97 | 102 | 66,790 | ||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale |
$ | 67,301 | $ | 97 | $ | 102 | $ | 67,296 | ||||||||
Held-to-maturity |
||||||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
$ | 54,913 | $ | 1,805 | $ | 47 | $ | 56,671 | ||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations,
residential |
30,124 | 29 | 232 | 29,921 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage backed securities, residential |
9,735 | 111 | | 9,846 | ||||||||||||
Other securities |
150 | | | 150 | ||||||||||||
Total Held-to-maturity |
$ | 94,922 | $ | 1,945 | $ | 279 | $ | 96,588 | ||||||||
6
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
($ in thousands, except share and per share data)
($ in thousands, except share and per share data)
The fair value of debt securities and carrying amount, if different, at June 30, 2010, by
contractual maturity were as follows. Securities not due at a single maturity date, primarily
mortgage-backed securities, are shown separately. There was one sale of a held-to-maturity
municipal security with a net carrying amount of $483 thousand that was sold for a loss of $5
thousand during the six month period ending June 30, 2010. Since the security had a non-rated
issuer, a credit review of the municipality was conducted. As a result of the review, it was
determined that the investment was no longer considered a pass asset and thus below investment
grade. Per investment policy, the Corporation is prohibited from holding any securities below
investment grade.
June 30, 2010 | ||||||||
Amortized | Fair | |||||||
Cost | Value | |||||||
Available-for-sale |
||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 12,703 | $ | 12,710 | ||||
Due from one to five years |
61,417 | 62,048 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 74,120 | $ | 74,758 | ||||
Held-to-maturity |
||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 8,454 | $ | 8,524 | ||||
Due from one to five years |
6,172 | 6,497 | ||||||
Due from five to ten years |
37,425 | 39,313 | ||||||
Due after ten years |
8,414 | 8,424 | ||||||
CMO/Mortgage-backed, residential |
36,544 | 37,273 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 97,009 | $ | 100,031 | ||||
Investment securities with a carrying value of approximately $89 million and $83 million were
pledged as collateral for Wealth Management accounts and securities sold under agreements to
repurchase at June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Securities with unrealized losses at June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, aggregated by investment
category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position, are as follows:
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or Longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Loss | Value | Loss | Value | Loss | |||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
None |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Held-to-maturity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage
obligations,
residential |
$ | 4,130 | $ | 32 | $ | | $ | | $ | 4,130 | $ | 32 | ||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
6,415 | 86 | | | 6,415 | 86 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Held-to-maturity |
$ | 10,545 | $ | 118 | $ | | $ | | $ | 10,545 | $ | 118 | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government agencies |
$ | 36,515 | $ | 102 | $ | | $ | | $ | 36,515 | $ | 102 | ||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale |
$ | 36,515 | $ | 102 | $ | | $ | | $ | 36,515 | $ | 102 | ||||||||||||
Held-to-maturity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage
obligations,
residential |
$ | 24,851 | $ | 232 | $ | | $ | | $ | 24,851 | $ | 232 | ||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
1,796 | 10 | 1,424 | 37 | 3,220 | 47 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Held-to-maturity |
$ | 26,647 | $ | 242 | $ | 1,424 | $ | 37 | $ | 28,071 | $ | 279 | ||||||||||||
7
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
($ in thousands, except share and per share data)
($ in thousands, except share and per share data)
In determining other-than-temporary-impairment (OTTI) for debt securities, management considers
many factors, including: (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been
less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the
market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions, and (4) whether the Company has the intent
to sell the debt security or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before
its anticipated recovery. The assessment of whether an other-than-temporary-impairment exists
involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to
management at a point in time.
When OTTI occurs, the amount of the OTTI recognized in earnings depends on whether an entity
intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security
before recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any current-period credit loss. If an entity
intends to sell or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security before
recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any current-period credit loss, the OTTI shall be
recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investments amortized cost basis
and its fair value at the balance sheet date. If an entity does not intend to sell the security
and it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before
recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period loss, the OTTI shall be separated into
the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of
the total OTTI related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value of cash flows
expected to be collected and is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total OTTI related to
other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. The previous
amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings becomes the new amortized cost basis of
the investment.
As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation held 19 investments in which the amortized cost was greater
than fair value. The Corporation has no securities in which OTTI has been recorded.
The unrealized losses for investments classified as held-to-maturity are attributable to changes in
interest rates and/or economic environment and individually were 3.42% or less of their respective
amortized costs. The unrealized losses relate primarily to residential collateralized mortgage
obligations and securities issued by various municipalities. The residential collateralized
mortgage obligations were purchased in September 2009. Prepayments have increased due to a
decrease in long-term interest rates from the time of the investment purchase and June 30, 2010,
which affects the fair value of residential collateralized mortgage obligations. All residential
collateralized mortgage obligations are backed by the U.S. Government and its agencies and
represent minimal credit risk at this time. The unrealized losses on securities issued by various
municipalities were mainly purchased during the second quarter of 2010. The largest unrealized
loss relates to one municipal that was purchased February 2006. The credit rating of the
individual municipalities is assessed monthly. As of June 30, 2010, all but four of the municipal
debt securities were rated BBB or better (as a result of insurance of the underlying rating on the
bond). The four municipal debt securities have no underlying rating. Credit reviews of the
municipalities have been conducted. As a result, we have determined that all of our non-rated debt
securities would be rated a pass asset and thus classified as an investment grade security. All
interest payments are current for all municipal securities and management expects all to be
collected in accordance with contractual terms.
Note 3: Loans
Loans, including net unamortized deferred fees and costs, consist of the following:
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
Residential loans secured by real estate |
$ | 266,532 | $ | 254,722 | ||||
Commercial loans secured by real estate |
267,681 | 232,841 | ||||||
Construction loans |
49,887 | 75,615 | ||||||
Other commercial and industrial loans |
273,586 | 273,117 | ||||||
Consumer loans |
31,234 | 28,427 | ||||||
Total loans |
888,920 | 864,722 | ||||||
Less allowance for loan losses |
(15,523 | ) | (13,716 | ) | ||||
Total loans, net |
$ | 873,397 | $ | 851,006 | ||||
8
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
($ in thousands, except share and per share data)
($ in thousands, except share and per share data)
The Corporation periodically sells residential mortgage loans it originates based on the overall
loan demand of the Corporation and outstanding balances of the residential mortgage portfolio.
There were no loans pledged as collateral for FHLB advances as of June 30, 2010, and December 31,
2009.
Activity in the allowance for loan losses was as follows:
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 14,759 | $ | 12,471 | $ | 13,716 | $ | 12,847 | ||||||||
Loan charge offs |
(509 | ) | (1,061 | ) | (717 | ) | (2,732 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries |
39 | 17 | 55 | 62 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
1,234 | 2,650 | 2,469 | 3,900 | ||||||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 15,523 | $ | 14,077 | $ | 15,523 | $ | 14,077 | ||||||||
Note 4: Real Estate Owned
Activity in real estate owned was as follows:
Six months ended | Twelve months ended | |||||||
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 8,432 | $ | 3,418 | ||||
Additions |
822 | 7,614 | ||||||
Write downs |
(46 | ) | (905 | ) | ||||
Sales |
(2,838 | ) | (1,695 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 6,370 | $ | 8,432 | ||||
Expenses related to real estate owned include:
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net gain on sales |
$ | (65 | ) | $ | (6 | ) | $ | (121 | ) | $ | (34 | ) | ||||
Write downs |
27 | 108 | 46 | 108 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses,
net of rental income |
159 | 153 | 295 | 202 | ||||||||||||
$ | 121 | $ | 255 | $ | 220 | $ | 276 | |||||||||
Note 5: Mortgage Banking Activities
The unpaid principal balances of mortgage loans serviced for others were $164.8 million and $154.3
million at June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Custodial escrow balances maintained in connection with serviced loans were $434 thousand and $1.2
million at June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, respectively.
9
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
($ in thousands, except share and per share data)
($ in thousands, except share and per share data)
The following table includes activity for mortgage servicing rights:
Six months ended | Twelve months ended | |||||||
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 1,459 | $ | 1,070 | ||||
Plus additions |
215 | 723 | ||||||
Fair value adjustments |
(438 | ) | (334 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 1,236 | $ | 1,459 | ||||
Mortgage servicing rights are carried at fair value at June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009. Fair
value at June 30, 2010, was determined using discount rates ranging from 10.7% to 16.0%, prepayment
speeds ranging from 8.08% to 24.24%, depending on the stratification of the specific right, and a
weighted average default rate of 0.33%. Fair value at December 31, 2009, was determined using
discount rates ranging from 11.0% to 17.0%, prepayment speeds ranging from 8.68% to 28.92%,
depending on the stratification of the specific right, and a weighted average default rate of
0.41%.
Note 6: Subordinated Term Loan Agreement/Revolving Line of Credit
On June 29, 2007, the Bank entered into a Subordinated Debenture Purchase Agreement with U.S. Bank
in the amount of $5.0 million, which will mature on June 28, 2017. Under the terms of the
Subordinated Debenture Purchase Agreement, the Bank pays 3-month LIBOR plus 1.20% which equated to
1.51% at June 30, 2010. Interest payments are due quarterly.
On June 29, 2007, the Corporation entered into a $5.0 million revolving loan agreement with U.S.
Bank, which matured on June 27, 2009, and was renewed and matured on August 31, 2009. The
revolving loan agreement was used to provide additional liquidity support to the Corporation, if
needed. On September 5, 2008, and December 11, 2008, the Corporation drew $1.3 million and $2.9
million, respectively, on the revolving loan agreement with U.S. Bank.
On August 31, 2009, U.S. Bank renewed the revolving loan agreement which will mature on August 31,
2010. As part of the renewal of the revolving loan agreement, U.S. Bank reduced the revolving loan
amount from $5.0 million to $2.0 million. Of the $4.0 million outstanding, $3.0 million was moved
to a separate one-year term facility with principal payments of $62.5 thousand and interest
payments due quarterly. Under the terms of the one-year term facility, the Corporation pays prime
plus 1.25% which equated to 4.50% at June 30, 2010.
Under the terms of the revolving loan agreement, the Corporation paid prime minus 1.25% which
equated to 2.00% through August 31, 2009, and interest payments were due quarterly. Beginning
September 1, 2009, the Corporation pays prime plus 1.25% which equated to 4.50% at June 30, 2010.
In addition, beginning October 1, 2009, U.S. Bank assessed a 0.25% fee on the unused portion of the
revolving line of credit.
The loan agreements contain various financial and non-financial covenants. One of the covenants
requires the Bank to maintain a loan loss reserve to non-performing loans at a minimum of 100%.
The Bank was in violation of this covenant as of June 30, 2010, as the loan loss reserve to
non-performing loans was 98.17%. The Bank was in compliance with all other covenants.
At this time, U.S. Bank has not indicated an intention to exercise any of its remedies available
under the credit facility as a result of the Corporations covenant violation. The remedies
available to U.S. Bank are: make the note immediately due and payable; termination of the
obligation to extend further credit; and/or invoke default interest rate of 3.0% over current
interest rate. Management does not believe the impact of any of these remedies would have a
material impact on the Corporations results of operation or financial position and is currently
discussing a waiver for this covenant violation with U.S. Bank.
10
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
($ in thousands, except share and per share data)
($ in thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 7: Trust Preferred Securities
In September 2000, the Corporation established the Trust, a Connecticut statutory business trust,
which subsequently issued $13.5 million of company obligated mandatorily redeemable capital
securities and $418 thousand of common securities. The proceeds from the issuance of both the
capital and common securities were used by the Trust to purchase from the Corporation $13.9 million
fixed rate junior subordinated debentures. The capital securities and debentures mature September
7, 2030, or upon earlier redemption as provided by the Indenture. The Corporation has the right to
redeem the capital securities, in whole or in part, but in all cases, in a principal amount with
integral multiples of a thousand dollars, on any March 7 or September 7 on or after September 7,
2010, at a premium, declining ratably to par on September 7, 2020. The capital securities and the
debentures have a fixed interest rate of 10.60%, and are guaranteed by the Bank. The subordinated
debentures are the sole assets of the Trust, and the Corporation owns all of the common securities
of the Trust. The net proceeds received by the Corporation from the sale of capital securities
were used for general corporate purposes. The indenture, dated September 7, 2000, requires
compliance with certain non-financial covenants.
The Corporation does not have the power to direct the activities of the trust, therefore, the trust
is not consolidated in the Corporations financial statements. The junior subordinated debt
obligation issued to the Trust of $13.9 million is reflected in the Corporations consolidated
balance sheets at June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009. The junior subordinated debentures owed to
the Trust and held by the Corporation qualify as Tier 1 capital for the Corporation under Federal
Reserve Board guidelines.
Interest payments made on the junior subordinated debentures are reported as a component of
interest expense on long-term debt.
Note 8: Stock Based Compensation
During the first quarter of 2010, four officers of the Corporation exercised options to purchase
5,300 common shares in aggregate. The weighted average exercise price was $24.68 and the weighted
average fair market value of the stock was $37.44.
During the second quarter of 2010, two directors and one officer of the Corporation exercised
options to purchase 5,600 common shares in aggregate. The weighted average exercise price was
$24.00 and the weighted average fair market value of the stock was $38.86.
Due to the exercise of these options and the vesting of restricted stock for the six months ended
June 30, 2010, the Corporation will receive a deduction for tax purposes for the difference between
the fair value of the stock at the date of grant and the date of exercise. The Corporation
recorded an income tax benefit of $50 thousand as additional paid in capital for the six months
ended June 30, 2010, as per guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) on
stock compensation.
Note 9: Earnings per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Basic average shares outstanding |
2,311,055 | 2,298,755 | 2,309,206 | 2,296,914 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 836 | $ | 79 | $ | 1,458 | $ | 924 | ||||||||
Basic net income per common share |
$ | 0.36 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.63 | $ | 0.40 | ||||||||
Diluted |
||||||||||||||||
Average shares outstanding |
2,311,055 | 2,298,755 | 2,309,206 | 2,296,914 | ||||||||||||
Nonvested restricted stock |
44,998 | 12,772 | 40,168 | 8,906 | ||||||||||||
Net effect of the assumed
exercise of stock options |
21,184 | 30,824 | 20,713 | 32,193 | ||||||||||||
Diluted average shares |
2,377,237 | 2,342,351 | 2,370,087 | 2,338,013 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 836 | $ | 79 | $ | 1,458 | $ | 924 | ||||||||
Diluted net income per common share |
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.62 | $ | 0.40 | ||||||||
11
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
($ in thousands, except share and per share data)
($ in thousands, except share and per share data)
For the three month period ending June 30, 2010, options to purchase 183,800 shares and 0
restricted shares were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per
share because they were antidilutive.
For the six month period ending June 30, 2010, options to purchase 183,800 shares and 4,325
restricted shares were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per
share because they were antidilutive.
For the three month period ending June 30, 2009, options to purchase 192,200 and 70,850 restricted
shares were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because
they were antidilutive
For the six month period ending June 30, 2009, options to purchase 192,200 and 70,850 restricted
shares were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because
they were antidilutive
Note 10: Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive
income includes unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale. Following is a
summary of other comprehensive income (loss):
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 836 | $ | 79 | $ | 1,458 | $ | 924 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
||||||||||||||||
Change in securities available for sale: |
||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gains (loss) during the period |
347 | (421 | ) | 643 | (906 | ) | ||||||||||
Tax effect |
(138 | ) | 165 | (255 | ) | 355 | ||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income (loss) |
209 | (256 | ) | 388 | (551 | ) | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 1,045 | $ | (177 | ) | $ | 1,846 | $ | 373 | |||||||
Note 11: Commitments and Contingencies
Some financial instruments, such as loan commitments, credit lines, letters of credit, and
overdraft protection are issued to meet customer financing needs. These are agreements to provide
credit or to support the credit of others, as long as conditions established in the contract are
met, and usually have expiration dates. Commitments may expire without being used. Off-balance
sheet risk to credit loss exists up to the face amount of these instruments, although material
losses are not anticipated.
The contractual amount of financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk was as follows:
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
Unused commercial credit lines |
$ | 204,151 | $ | 198,815 | ||||
Unused revolving home equity and credit card lines |
103,152 | 99,629 | ||||||
Standby letters of credit |
8,033 | 24,338 | ||||||
Demand deposit account lines of credit |
2,565 | 2,499 | ||||||
$ | 317,901 | $ | 325,281 | |||||
The majority of commitments to fund loans are variable rate. The demand deposit account lines of
credit are a fixed rate at 18% with no maturity.
The credit risk associated with loan commitments and standby letters of credit is essentially the
same as that involved in extending loans to customers and is subject to normal credit policies.
Collateral may be obtained based on managements credit assessment of the customer.
The Corporation has been named as a defendant in one lawsuit. Based upon information presently
available, we believe that the total amount, if any, that will ultimately be paid arising from this
lawsuit will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operation or
financial position.
12
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
($ in thousands, except share and per share data)
($ in thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 12: Fair Value
Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a
liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels
of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active
markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are
not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by
observable market data.
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entitys own
assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an
asset or liability.
The Corporation used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate the fair value
of each type of asset or liability carried at fair value:
The fair value of available-for-sale securities are determined by obtaining quoted prices on
nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a
mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying
exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on securities
relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs).
The fair value of mortgage servicing rights is based on a valuation model that calculates the
present value of estimated net servicing income. The valuation model incorporates assumptions that
market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income. The Corporation is able
to compare the valuation model inputs and results to widely available published industry data for
reasonableness.
The fair value of impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses is
generally based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation
approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach.
Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences
between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are usually significant
and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.
Nonrecurring adjustments to certain commercial and residential real estate properties classified as
other real estate owned (OREO) are measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value, less
costs to sell. Fair values are generally based on third party appraisals of the property resulting
in a Level 3 classification. In cases where the carrying amount exceeds the fair value less costs
to sell, an impairment loss is recognized.
13
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
($ in thousands, except share and per share data)
($ in thousands, except share and per share data)
Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
Fair Value Measurements Using: | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices | ||||||||||||||||
in Active Markets | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||||||
for Identical | Other | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Assets | Observable Inputs | Inputs | ||||||||||||||
Carrying Value | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Available for sale
securities |
$ | 74,758 | $ | | $ | 74,758 | $ | | ||||||||
Mortgage servicing
rights |
1,236 | | 1,236 | | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Available for sale
securities |
$ | 67,296 | $ | | $ | 67,296 | $ | | ||||||||
Mortgage servicing
rights |
1,459 | | 1,459 | |
A detailed breakdown of the fair value for the available-for-sale investment securities is provided
in the Investment Securities note.
Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:
Fair Value Measurements Using: | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices | ||||||||||||||||
in Active Markets | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||||||
for Identical | Other | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Assets | Observable Inputs | Inputs | ||||||||||||||
Carrying Value | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Impaired loans |
$ | 5,389 | $ | | $ | | $ | 5,389 | ||||||||
Other real estate |
607 | | | 607 | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Impaired loans |
$ | 6,120 | $ | | $ | | $ | 6,120 | ||||||||
Other real estate |
2,017 | | | 2,017 |
Impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for
collateral dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $8.2 million, with a valuation allowance of
$2.8 million, at June 30, 2010. This resulted in an additional provision for loan losses of $1.1
million and $1.2 million for the three month and six month periods ending June 30, 2010,
respectively.
Other real estate, measured at fair value less costs to sell, had a carrying amount of $607
thousand at June 30, 2010. There was a charge to earnings through non performing asset expense of
$27 thousand and $46 thousand for the
three month and six month periods ending June 30, 2010, respectively.
14
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
($ in thousands, except share and per share data)
($ in thousands, except share and per share data)
The estimated fair value of the Corporations financial instruments is as follows:
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | |||||||||||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | |||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 166,140 | $ | 166,140 | $ | 149,375 | $ | 149,375 | ||||||||
Federal funds sold |
13,631 | 13,631 | 1,242 | 1,242 | ||||||||||||
Reverse repurchase agreements |
1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
74,758 | 74,758 | 67,296 | 67,296 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities held-to-maturity |
97,009 | 100,031 | 94,922 | 96,588 | ||||||||||||
Net loans |
873,397 | 874,251 | 851,006 | 850,877 | ||||||||||||
Federal Reserve and FHLB stock |
3,150 | N/A | 3,150 | N/A | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
4,126 | 4,126 | 4,199 | 4,199 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
1,107,201 | 1,109,154 | 1,052,065 | 1,053,849 | ||||||||||||
Repurchase agreements and other
secured short-term borrowings |
80,258 | 80,313 | 81,314 | 81,415 | ||||||||||||
Short-term debt |
4,013 | 4,013 | 4,138 | 4,138 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated debt |
5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | ||||||||||||
Junior subordinated debt |
13,918 | 10,173 | 13,918 | 10,102 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable |
2,033 | 2,033 | 2,158 | 2,158 |
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Corporation in estimating its fair value
disclosures for financial instruments not recorded at fair value: Carrying amount is the estimated
fair value for cash and short-term investments, interest bearing deposits, accrued interest
receivable and payable, demand deposits, borrowings under repurchase agreements, short-term debt,
variable rate loans or deposits that reprice frequently and fully. For fixed rate loans, deposits,
other secured short-term borrowings, variable rate loans or deposits with infrequent pricing or
repricing limits, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied
to the estimated life and credit risk. It was not practicable to determine the fair value of
Federal Reserve or FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability. The fair value of
the subordinated debt and junior subordinated debentures are based upon discounted cash flows using
rates for similar securities with the same maturities. The fair value of off-balance-sheet items is
not considered material.
Note 13: Adoption of New Accounting Standards
In April 2010, the FASB amended previous guidance on receivables specifically relating to loans and
debt securities acquired with deteriorated credit quality and the effect of a loan modification
when the loan is part of a pool that is accounted for as a single asset. Loans that are accounted
for within a pool under this guidance do not result in the removal of the loans from the pool even
if the modification of the loans would otherwise be considered a troubled debt restructuring. The
Corporation will be required to consider whether the pool of assets in which the loans are included
is impaired if the expected cash flows for the pool changes. The amendments to this guidance do
not affect the accounting for loans under the scope of loan and debt securities acquired with
deteriorated credit quality that is accounted for on individual loans. Loans that are accounted
for individually will continue to be subject to the troubled debt restructuring accounting
provision within the troubled debt restructurings by Creditors within the receivables guidance.
The amended guidance is effective in the first interim or annual period ending July 15, 2010. The
amendments are to be applied prospectively and early application is permitted. The adoption of
this standard is did not have a material effect on the Corporations results of operations or
financial position.
In April 2010, the FASB amended previous guidance relating to stock compensation. This amended
guidance clarifies that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in
the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entitys equity securities trade
should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service
condition and therefore should not classify the award as a liability if the share-based payment
qualifies as an equity. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within
those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this standard is not
expected to have a material effect on the Corporations results of operations or financial
position.
15
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Corporation Overview
The National Bank of Indianapolis Corporation (the Corporation) is a one-bank holding company
formed in 1993 which owns all of the outstanding stock of The National Bank of Indianapolis (the
Bank). The Bank, a national banking association, was formed in 1993 and is headquartered in
Indianapolis, Indiana. The primary business activity of the Corporation is providing financial
services through the Banks twelve banking offices in Marion, Johnson, and Hamilton County,
Indiana.
The primary source of the Corporations revenue is net interest income from loans and deposits and
fees from financial services provided to customers. Overall economic factors including market
interest rates, business spending, and consumer confidence, as well as competitive conditions
within the marketplace tend to influence business volumes.
The Corporation recorded net income of $836 thousand or $0.35 per diluted share for the three month
period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to $79 thousand or $0.03 per diluted share for the three
month period ending June 30, 2009.
The Corporation recorded net income of $1.5 million or $0.62 per diluted share for the six month
period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to $924 thousand or $0.40 per diluted share for the six
month period ending June 30, 2009. Net income increased for the three and six month periods ending
June 30, 2010, as compared to the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2009, primarily due
to a decrease in the provision for loan losses and FDIC insurance assessments. The increase is
partially offset by an increase in salary expense for the three and six month periods ending June
30, 2010, as compared to the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2009.
The risks and challenges that management believes will be important for the remainder of 2010 are
price competition for loans and deposits by competitors, marketplace credit effects, continued
spread compression, a continued slowdown in the local economy that could adversely impact the
ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans or the value of the collateral securing these
loans, and the lingering effects from the financial crisis in the U.S. and foreign markets.
The Corporation has determined that it has one reportable segment, banking services. The Bank
provides a full range of deposit, credit, and money management services to its target markets,
which are small to medium size businesses, affluent executive and professional individuals, and
not-for-profit organizations in the Indianapolis Metropolitan Statistical Area of Indiana.
Forward-Looking Information
This section contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give current
expectations or forecasts of future events and are not guarantees of future performance. The
forward-looking statements are based on managements expectations and are subject to a number of
risks and uncertainties. Although management believes the expectations reflected in such
forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results may differ materially from those
expressed or implied in such statements. Risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to
differ materially include, without limitation, the Corporations ability to execute its business
plans; changes in general economic and financial market conditions; changes in interest rates;
changes in competitive conditions; continuing consolidation in the financial services industry; new
litigation or changes in existing litigation; losses, customer bankruptcy, claims and assessments;
changes in banking regulations or other regulatory or legislative requirements that impact the
Corporations business; and changes in accounting policies and procedures as may be required by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board or other regulatory agencies. Additional information
concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or
implied in the forward-looking statements is available in the Corporations Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Corporations consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States and follow general practices within the
industries in which it operates. Application of these principles requires management to make
estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements
and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions, and judgments are based on information
available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates,
16
Table of Contents
assumptions, and judgments. Certain
policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments and
as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than
originally reported. Estimates, assumptions, and judgments are necessary when assets and
liabilities are required to be recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not
carried on the financial statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation
reserve to be established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon a
future event. Carrying assets and liabilities at fair value inherently results in more financial
statement volatility. The fair values and the information used to record valuation adjustments for
certain assets are based either on quoted market prices or are provided by other third-party
sources, when available. When third-party information is not available, valuation adjustments are
estimated in good faith by management primarily through the use of internal cash flow modeling
techniques.
Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the
methods, assumptions, and estimates underlying those amounts, management has identified the
valuation of the mortgage servicing asset, the valuation of investment securities, and the
determination of the allowance for loan losses to be the accounting areas that require the most
subjective or complex judgments, and as such could be most subject to revision as new information
becomes available.
Mortgage Servicing Assets
Mortgage servicing rights are recognized separately when they are acquired through sales of loans.
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights are reported in other assets. When mortgage loans are sold,
servicing rights are initially recorded at fair value with the income statement effect recorded in
gains on sales of loans. Fair value is based on a valuation model that calculates the present
value of estimated future net servicing income. The valuation model incorporates assumptions that
market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, such as the cost to
service, the discount rate, the custodial earnings rate, an inflation rate, ancillary income,
prepayment speeds and default rates and losses. The Corporation obtains fair value estimates from
an independent third party and compares significant valuation model inputs to published industry
data in order to validate the model assumptions and results.
Under the fair value measurement method, the Corporation measures servicing rights at fair value at
each reporting date and reports changes in fair value of servicing assets in earnings in the period
in which the changes occur, and these changes are included in mortgage banking income on the income
statement. The fair values of servicing rights are subject to significant fluctuations as a result
of changes in estimated and actual prepayment speeds and default rates and losses.
Investment Securities Valuation
When the Corporation classifies debt securities as held-to-maturity, it has the positive intent and
ability to hold the securities to maturity. Held-to-maturity securities are stated at amortized
cost. Debt securities not classified as held-to-maturity are classified as available-for-sale.
Available-for-sale securities are stated at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net
of tax, reported as a component of other comprehensive income. Interest income includes
amortization of purchase premium or discount. Premiums and discounts on securities are amortized
on the level-yield method without anticipating prepayments, except for mortgage backed securities
where prepayments are anticipated. Gains and losses on sales are recorded on the trade date and
determined using the specific identification method.
The Corporation obtains fair values from a third party on a monthly basis in order to adjust
the available-for-sale securities to fair value. Equity securities that do not have readily
determinable fair values are carried at cost. When other-than-temporary-impairment (OTTI) occurs,
the amount of the OTTI recognized in earnings depends on whether an entity intends to sell the
security or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security before recovery of
its amortized cost basis, less any current-period credit loss. If an entity intends to sell or it
is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized
cost basis, less any current-period credit loss, the OTTI shall be recognized in earnings equal to
the entire difference between the investments amortized cost basis and its fair value at the
balance sheet date. If an entity does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely
than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized
cost basis less any current-period loss, the OTTI shall be separated into the amount representing
the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of the total OTTI related
to the credit loss is determined based on the present value of cash flows expected to be collected
and is recognized in
earnings. The amount of the total OTTI related to other factors is recognized in other
comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. The previous amortized cost basis less the OTTI
recognized in earnings becomes the new amortized cost basis of the investment.
17
Table of Contents
In determining whether a market value decline is other-than-temporary, management considers
the reason for the decline, the extent of the decline and the duration of the decline. Management
evaluates securities for OTTI at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or
market conditions warrant such an evaluation.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses. The
allowance for loan losses is established through provisions for loan losses charged against income.
Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses, and subsequent
recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance for loan losses.
Management estimates the allowance balance required using past loan loss experience, the nature and
volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral
values, economic conditions, and other factors. Allocations of the allowance may be made for
specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in managements judgment,
should be charged off.
Within the allowance, there are specific and general loss components. The specific loss component
is assessed for non-homogeneous loans that management believes to be impaired. Loans are
considered to be impaired when it is determined that the obligor will not pay all contractual
principal and interest due. For loans determined to be impaired, the loans carrying value is
compared to its fair value using one of the following fair value measurement techniques: present
value of expected future cash flows, observable market price, or fair value of the associated
collateral less costs to sell. An allowance is established when the fair value is lower than the
carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non-impaired loans and is based on
historical loss experience adjusted for current factors. These loans are segregated by major
product type and/or risk grade with an estimated loss ratio applied against each product type
and/or risk grade. The loss ratio is generally based upon historic loss experience for each loan
type as adjusted for certain environmental factors management believes to be relevant.
It is the policy of the Corporation to promptly charge off any loan, or portion thereof, which is
deemed to be uncollectible. This includes, but is not limited to, any loan rated Loss by the
regulatory authorities. Impaired commercial credits are considered on a case-by-case basis. An
assessment of the adequacy of the allowance is performed on a quarterly basis. Management believes
the allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level that is adequate to absorb probable incurred
losses inherent in the loan portfolio.
Results of Operations
Net Interest Income
The Corporations results of operations depend primarily on the level of its net interest income,
its non-interest income and its operating expenses. Net interest income depends on the volume of
and rates associated with interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities which results in
the net interest spread. The Corporation had net interest income fully taxable equivalent (FTE)
of $19.3 million for the six month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to net interest income
FTE of $18.1 million for the six month period ending June 30, 2009. The increase in net interest
income FTE is due to an increase in total earning assets FTE of $90.3 million for the six month
period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to the six month period ending June 30, 2009.
Additionally, total interest bearing liabilities increased $83.4 million for the six month period
ending June 30, 2010, as compared to the six month period ending June 30, 2009. The net interest
income spread FTE increased 0.02% to 3.12% for the six month period ending June 30, 2010, from
3.10% for the six month period ending June 30, 2009. The contribution of non-interest bearing
funds decreased 0.07% to 0.14% from 0.21% for the six month period ending June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, resulting in an overall decrease to the net interest margin FTE to 3.26% from 3.33%
for the six month period ending June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
18
Table of Contents
The following table details average balances, interest income/expense average rates/yields for the
Corporations earning assets and interest bearing liabilities at the dates indicated.
Six months ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest | Average | Interest | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Income/ | Rate/ | Average | Income/ | Rate/ | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Expense | Yield | Balance | Expense | Yield | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest bearing due from banks |
$ | 140,487 | $ | 176 | 0.25 | % | $ | 60,356 | $ | 76 | 0.25 | % | ||||||||||||
Reverse repurchase agreements |
1,000 | | 0.01 | % | 1,000 | | 0.01 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Federal funds |
4,447 | 5 | 0.22 | % | 4,310 | 3 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Non taxable investment
securities FTE |
55,314 | 1,568 | 5.67 | % | 56,749 | 1,595 | 5.62 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Taxable investments securities |
107,397 | 1,119 | 2.08 | % | 81,094 | 1,661 | 4.10 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Loans (gross) FTE |
874,008 | 21,122 | 4.83 | % | 888,835 | 20,726 | 4.66 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total earning assets |
$ | 1,182,653 | $ | 23,990 | 4.06 | % | $ | 1,092,344 | $ | 24,061 | 4.41 | % | ||||||||||||
Non-earning assets |
90,131 | 83,028 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,272,784 | $ | 1,175,372 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest bearing DDA |
$ | 196,968 | $ | 261 | 0.27 | % | $ | 147,669 | $ | 320 | 0.43 | % | ||||||||||||
Savings |
485,740 | 1,448 | 0.60 | % | 468,309 | 1,898 | 0.81 | % | ||||||||||||||||
CDs under $100 |
61,602 | 596 | 1.94 | % | 63,653 | 900 | 2.83 | % | ||||||||||||||||
CDs over $100 |
125,280 | 1,147 | 1.83 | % | 130,354 | 1,666 | 2.56 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Individual retirement accounts |
22,668 | 244 | 2.15 | % | 18,838 | 278 | 2.95 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Repurchase agreements and other
secured short term borrowings |
83,674 | 144 | 0.34 | % | 63,583 | 85 | 0.27 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Short-term debt |
4,106 | 94 | 4.58 | % | 4,200 | 42 | 2.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Subordinated debt |
5,000 | 38 | 1.52 | % | 5,000 | 64 | 2.56 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Long term debt |
13,918 | 738 | 10.60 | % | 13,918 | 738 | 10.60 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest bearing liabilities |
$ | 998,956 | $ | 4,710 | 0.94 | % | $ | 915,524 | $ | 5,991 | 1.31 | % | ||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing liabilities |
194,035 | 178,885 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
5,116 | 7,485 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 1,198,107 | $ | 1,101,894 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Equity |
74,677 | 73,478 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities & equity |
$ | 1,272,784 | $ | 1,175,372 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Recap: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income FTE |
$ | 23,990 | 4.06 | % | $ | 24,061 | 4.41 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
4,710 | 0.94 | % | $ | 5,991 | 1.31 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest income/spread FTE |
$ | 19,280 | 3.12 | % | $ | 18,070 | 3.10 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Contribution of non-interest
bearing funds |
0.14 | % | 0.21 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin FTE |
3.26 | % | 3.31 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Notes to the average balance and interest rate tables:
| Average balances are computed using daily actual balances. |
||
| The average loan balance includes non-accrual loans and the interest recognized prior to
becoming non-accrual is reflected in the interest income for loans. |
||
| Interest income on loans includes loan fees net of loan costs, of $(295) thousand and
$(318) thousand, for the six month period ending June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
19
Table of Contents
| Net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis, the most significant component
of the Corporations
earnings, is total interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis less total interest
expense. The level of net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis is determined
by the mix and volume of interest earning assets, interest bearing deposits and borrowed
funds, and changes in interest rates. |
||
| Net interest spread is the difference between the fully taxable equivalent rate earned
on interest earning assets less the rate expensed on interest bearing liabilities. |
||
| Net interest margin represents net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis
as a percentage of average interest earning assets. Net interest margin is affected by
both the interest rate spread and the level of non-interest bearing sources of funds,
primarily consisting of demand deposits and shareholders equity. |
||
| Interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis includes the additional amount of
interest income that would have been earned on tax exempt loans and if investments in
certain tax-exempt interest earning assets had been made in assets subject to federal taxes
yielding the same after-tax income. Interest income on tax exempt loans and municipal
securities has been calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis using a federal and
state income tax blended rate of 40%. The appropriate tax equivalent adjustments to
interest income on loans was $136 thousand and $50 thousand for the six month period ending
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The appropriate tax equivalent adjustments to
interest income on municipal securities was $553 thousand and $551 thousand for the six
month period ending June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
||
| Management believes the disclosure of the fully taxable equivalent net interest income
information improves the clarity of financial analysis, and is particularly useful to
investors in understanding and evaluating the changes and trends in the Corporations
results of operations. This adjustment is considered helpful in the comparison of one
financial institutions net interest income to that of another institution, as each will
have a different proportion of tax-exempt interest from their earning asset portfolios. |
Provision for Loan Losses
The amount charged to the provision for loan losses by the Bank is based on managements evaluation
as to the amounts required to maintain an allowance adequate to provide for probable incurred
losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The level of this allowance is dependent upon the total
amount of past due and non-performing loans, general economic conditions and managements
assessment of probable incurred losses based upon internal credit evaluations of loan portfolios
and particular loans. Loans are principally to borrowers in central Indiana.
The provision for loan losses was $1.2 million and $2.7 million, for the three month period ending
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The provision for loan losses was $2.5 million for the six
month period ending June 30, 2010, compared to a provision for loan losses of $3.9 million for the
six month period ending June 30, 2009. The decrease in the provision for loan losses for the three
and six month period ending June 30, 2010, compared to the three and six month period ending June
30, 2009, is due to an overall decrease in chargeoffs.
Based on managements risk assessment and evaluation of the probable incurred losses of the loan
portfolio, management believes that the current allowance for loan losses is adequate to provide
for probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio.
20
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth activity in the allowance for loan
losses:
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Beginning of Period |
$ | 14,759 | $ | 12,471 | $ | 13,716 | $ | 12,847 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
1,234 | 2,650 | 2,469 | 3,900 | ||||||||||||
Chargeoffs |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
335 | 212 | 425 | 1,816 | ||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate |
73 | | 73 | | ||||||||||||
Residential Mortgage |
60 | 130 | 125 | 189 | ||||||||||||
Consumer |
1 | 1 | 34 | 9 | ||||||||||||
Credit Cards |
40 | 64 | 60 | 64 | ||||||||||||
Construction |
| 654 | | 654 | ||||||||||||
509 | 1,061 | 717 | 2,732 | |||||||||||||
Recoveries |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
30 | 7 | 38 | 18 | ||||||||||||
Residential Mortgage |
6 | 7 | 13 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Consumer |
2 | | 2 | | ||||||||||||
Credit Cards |
1 | 3 | 2 | 33 | ||||||||||||
39 | 17 | 55 | 62 | |||||||||||||
End of Period |
$ | 15,523 | $ | 14,077 | $ | 15,523 | $ | 14,077 | ||||||||
Allowance as a % of Loans |
1.75 | % | 1.56 | % | 1.75 | % | 1.56 | % |
Loans are considered to be impaired when it is determined that the obligor will not pay all
contractual principal and interest when due.
The table below provides information on impaired loans:
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||
Balance of impaired loans |
$ | 16,681 | $ | 15,106 | $ | 11,567 | ||||||
Related allowance on impaired loans |
2,770 | 1,724 | 1,380 | |||||||||
Impaired loans with related allowance |
8,159 | 7,844 | 7,340 | |||||||||
Impaired loans without an allowance |
8,522 | 7,262 | 4,227 | |||||||||
Average balance of impaired loans |
15,199 | 11,961 | 10,767 | |||||||||
Accrued
interest recorded during impairment |
1 | | | |||||||||
Cash basis interest income recognized |
| | |
A loan is considered delinquent when a payment has not been made more than 30 days past its
contractual due date. Loans past due over 30 days, including past due nonaccrual loans, totaled
$11.9 million or 1.34% of total loans at June 30, 2010, compared to $11.3 million or 1.25% of total
loans at June 30, 2009.
Loans greater than 90 days past due and still accruing interest at June 30, 2010 and 2009, totaled
approximately $26 thousand and $13 thousand, respectively. The total amount of nonaccrual loans was
$16.8 million at June 30, 2010, compared to $11.6 million at June 30, 2009. Not all nonaccrual
loans are 90 days past due.
It is the policy of the Corporation to review each prospective credit in order to determine the
appropriateness and, when required, the adequacy of security or collateral necessary when making a
loan. The type of collateral when required will vary from liquid assets to real estate. The
Corporation seeks to assure access to collateral in the event of default through adherence to state
lending laws and the Corporations credit monitoring procedures.
21
Table of Contents
Other Operating Income
The following table details the components of other operating income:
Three months ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, | $ | % | ||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | Change | |||||||||||||
Wealth management fees |
$ | 1,467 | $ | 1,336 | $ | 131 | 9.8 | % | ||||||||
Rental income |
76 | 79 | (3 | ) | -3.8 | % | ||||||||||
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts |
749 | 756 | (7 | ) | -0.9 | % | ||||||||||
Mortgage banking income |
268 | 647 | (379 | ) | -58.6 | % | ||||||||||
Interchange income |
314 | 243 | 71 | 29.2 | % | |||||||||||
Net loss on sale of securities |
(5 | ) | | (5 | ) | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
Other |
438 | 508 | (70 | ) | -13.8 | % | ||||||||||
Total other operating income |
$ | 3,307 | $ | 3,569 | $ | (262 | ) | -7.3 | % | |||||||
Total other operating income for the three month period ending June 30, 2010, decreased as compared
to the three month period ending June 30, 2009.
Wealth management fees increased for the three month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to
the three month period ending June 30, 2009. The increase in wealth management fees is
attributable to an increase in estate fees, tax preparation fees, as well as an increase in the
stock market. The increase is partially offset by a decrease in Dreyfus money market funds.
Rental income decreased for the three month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to the three
month period ending June 30, 2009. This was due to the bank occupying more space at the 107 North
Pennsylvania Street location thus reducing the space available for tenants.
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts decreased for the three month period ending June 30,
2010, as compared to the three month period ending June 30, 2009. The decrease is primarily
attributable to a decrease in service charges collected for DDA business and non-profit accounts
and overdraft and NSF fees.
Mortgage banking income decreased for the three month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to
the three month period ending June 30, 2009. The decrease for the three month period ending June
30, 2010, as compared to the three month period ending June 30, 2009, is due to a write down of the
fair value of mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) of $349 thousand for the three month period
ending June 30, 2010, as compared to a write up of $69 thousand for the three month period ending
June 30, 2009. Offsetting this decrease was an increase in the net gain on the sale of mortgage
loans. A net gain on the sale of mortgage loans of $513 thousand was recorded for the three month
period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to a net gain on the sale of mortgage loans of $495
thousand for the three month period ending June 30, 2009.
When mortgage loans are sold and the MSRs are retained, the MSRs are recorded as an asset on the
balance sheet. The value of the MSRs is sensitive to changes in interest rates. In a declining
interest rate environment, mortgage loan refinancings generally increase, causing actual and
expected loan prepayments to increase, which decreases the value of existing MSRs. Conversely, as
interest rates rise, mortgage loan refinancings generally decline, causing actual and expected loan
prepayments to decrease, which increases the value of the MSRs.
Interchange income increased for the three month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to the
three month period ending June 30, 2009. The increase is attributable to higher transaction
volumes for debit cards and credit cards during the three month period ending June 30, 2010, as
compared to the three month period ending June 30, 2009. Additionally, there was a decrease in
cash back rewards expense for the three months ended June 30, 2010, as compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2009.
Net loss on sale of securities increased for the three month period ending June 30, 2010, as
compared to the three month period ending June 30, 2009. There was one sale of a held-to-maturity
municipal security during the six month period ending June 30, 2010. Since the security had a
non-rated issuer, a credit review of the municipality was conducted. As a result of the review, it
was determined that the investment was no longer considered a pass asset and thus below investment
grade. Per investment policy, the Corporation is prohibited from holding any securities below
investment grade.
22
Table of Contents
Other income decreased for the three month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to the three
month period
ending June 30, 2009. The decrease is primarily due to a decrease in bank owned life insurance
income, application fees, letter of credit fees, late fee income, Dreyfus money market funds sweep
fees, and income collected for a swap fee. The decrease is partially offset by an increase in
prepayment penalties collected and Mastercard/Visa merchant fees.
Six months ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, | $ | % | ||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | Change | |||||||||||||
Wealth management fees |
$ | 2,671 | $ | 2,421 | $ | 250 | 10.3 | % | ||||||||
Rental income |
145 | 185 | (40 | ) | -21.6 | % | ||||||||||
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts |
1,518 | 1,524 | (6 | ) | -0.4 | % | ||||||||||
Mortgage banking income |
480 | 949 | (469 | ) | -49.4 | % | ||||||||||
Interchange income |
598 | 453 | 145 | 32.0 | % | |||||||||||
Net loss on sale of securities |
(5 | ) | | (5 | ) | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
Other |
833 | 1,040 | (207 | ) | -19.9 | % | ||||||||||
Total other operating income |
$ | 6,240 | $ | 6,572 | $ | (332 | ) | -5.1 | % | |||||||
Total other operating income for the six month period ending June 30, 2010, decreased as compared
to the six month period ending June 30, 2009.
Wealth management fees increased for the six month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to the
six month period ending June 30, 2009. The increase in wealth management fees is attributable to
an increase in estate fees, tax preparation fees, as well as an increase in the stock market. The
increase is partially offset by a decrease in Dreyfus money market funds.
Rental income decreased for the six month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to the six month
period ending June 30, 2009. This was due to the bank occupying more space at the 107 North
Pennsylvania Street location thus reducing the space available for tenants.
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts decreased for the six month period ending June 30,
2010, as compared to the six month period ending June 30, 2009. The decrease is primarily
attributable to a decrease in service charges collected for non-profit accounts and overdraft and
NSF fees. The decrease is partially offset by an increase in service charges collected for DDA
business accounts and wire transfer fees for the six month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared
to the six month period ending June 30, 2009.
Mortgage banking income decreased for the six month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to the
six month period ending June 30, 2009. The decrease for the six month period ending June 30, 2010,
as compared to the six month period ending June 30, 2009, is due to a write down of the fair value
of mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) of $438 thousand for the six month period ending June 30,
2010, as compared to a write down of $141 thousand for the six month period ending June 30, 2009.
Additionally, a net gain on the sale of mortgage loans of $714 thousand was recorded for the six
month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to a net gain on the sale of mortgage loans of $927
thousand for the six month period ending June 30, 2009.
When mortgage loans are sold and the MSRs are retained, the MSRs are recorded as an asset on the
balance sheet. The value of the MSRs is sensitive to changes in interest rates. In a declining
interest rate environment, mortgage loan refinancings generally increase, causing actual and
expected loan prepayments to increase, which decreases the value of existing MSRs. Conversely, as
interest rates rise, mortgage loan refinancings generally decline, causing actual and expected loan
prepayments to decrease, which increases the value of the MSRs.
Interchange income increased for the six month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to the six
month period ending June 30, 2009. The increase is attributable to higher transaction volumes for
debit cards and credit cards during the six month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to the
six month period ending June 30, 2009. Additionally, there was a decrease in cash back rewards
expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009.
23
Table of Contents
Net loss on sale of securities increased for the six month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared
the six month period ending June 30, 2009. There was one sale of a held-to-maturity municipal
security during the six month period ending June 30, 2010. Since the security had a non-rated
issuer, a credit review of the municipality was conducted. As a result of the review, it was
determined that the investment was no longer considered a pass asset and thus below investment
grade. Per investment policy, the Corporation is prohibited from holding any securities below
investment grade.
Other income decreased for the six month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to the six month
period ending June 30, 2009. The decrease is primarily due to a decrease in bank owned life
insurance income, documentation and application fees, letter of credit fees, late fee income,
Dreyfus money market funds sweep fees, and income collected for a swap fee. The decrease is
partially offset by an increase in prepayment penalties collected and Mastercard/Visa merchant
fees.
Other Operating Expenses
The following table details the components of other operating
expense:
Three months ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, | $ | % | ||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | Change | |||||||||||||
Salaries, wages and employee benefits |
$ | 6,179 | $ | 5,403 | $ | 776 | 14.4 | % | ||||||||
Occupancy |
647 | 641 | 6 | 0.9 | % | |||||||||||
Furniture and equipment |
330 | 355 | (25 | ) | -7.0 | % | ||||||||||
Professional services |
554 | 427 | 127 | 29.7 | % | |||||||||||
Data processing |
802 | 689 | 113 | 16.4 | % | |||||||||||
Business development |
459 | 417 | 42 | 10.1 | % | |||||||||||
FDIC Insurance |
501 | 942 | (441 | ) | -46.8 | % | ||||||||||
Non performing assets |
147 | 264 | (117 | ) | -44.3 | % | ||||||||||
Other |
845 | 922 | (77 | ) | -8.4 | % | ||||||||||
Total other operating expenses |
$ | 10,464 | $ | 10,060 | $ | 404 | 4.0 | % | ||||||||
Total other operating expenses for the three month period ending June 30, 2010, increased as
compared to the three month period ending June 30, 2009.
Salaries, wages, and employee benefits increased for the three month period ending June 30, 2010,
as compared to the three month period ending June 30, 2009. The increase is the result of
increased salary expense, employer FICA expense, group medical and dental benefits, performance
bonus, and deferred compensation. Salary expense, employer FICA expense, and group medical and
dental benefits increased due to an increase in full-time equivalent employees of 15 from 252 at
June 30, 2009, compared to 267 at June 30, 2010. Deferred compensation increased due to the
issuance of restricted stock during the second quarter of 2009. The increase is partially offset
by a decrease in 401(k) employer match contributions and direct loan origination costs.
Occupancy expense increased for the three month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to the
three month period ending June 30, 2009. The increase is due to an increase in building and
improvements depreciation expense due to the opening of the banking center located at 11701 Olio
Road in December 2009, building and property repairs and maintenance, cleaning supplies, management
fees, and utilities. The increase is partially offset by a decrease in real estate taxes and
building operating costs.
Furniture and equipment expense decreased for the three month period ending June 30, 2010, as
compared to the three month period ending June 30, 2009. This decrease is due to a decrease in
depreciation for furniture, fixture, and equipment due to older assets being fully depreciated.
Professional services expense increased for the three month period ending June 30, 2010, as
compared to the three month period ending June 30, 2009. The increase is due to an increase in
consulting fees, courier service, design services, and attorney fees.
Data processing expenses increased for the three month period ending June 30, 2010, as
compared to the three month period ending June 30, 2009. The increase is due to an increase in
bill payment services, ATM/debit cards, credit cards, fiduciary income tax preparation for Wealth
Management accounts, computer software, software maintenance, and increased service bureau fees
related to increased activity by the Bank.
24
Table of Contents
Business development expenses increased for the three month period ending June 30, 2010, as
compared to the three period ending June 30, 2009. The increase is due to an increase in public
relations, grand opening expense, direct mail campaign, and sales and product literature. The
increase is partially offset by a decrease in customer entertainment.
FDIC insurance expense decreased for the three month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to
the three month period ending June 30, 2009. The decrease is due to a special assessment of $557
thousand that was expensed during the second quarter of 2009. The decrease is partially offset by
an overall increase in the FDIC assessment.
Nonperforming assets expenses decreased for the three month period ending June 30, 2010, as
compared to the three month period ending June 30, 2009. This is due to a decrease in the write
down of the carrying value of other real estate owned. Also contributing to the decrease was an
increase on the gain from the sale of other real estate. The decrease is partially offset by an
increase in classified loan expense.
Other expenses decreased for the three month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to the three
period ending June 30, 2009. During the three month period ending June 30, 2009, the Corporation
recorded a loss of $40 thousand as a result of the Heartland Payment Systems credit card software
compromise and a charge of $50 thousand related to certain deposit accounts. Also contributing to
the decrease was a decrease in postage expense. The decrease is partially offset by an increase in
telephone service, personal property taxes, and stationery and printing.
Six months ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, | $ | % | ||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | Change | |||||||||||||
Salaries, wages and employee benefits |
$ | 12,113 | $ | 10,757 | $ | 1,356 | 12.6 | % | ||||||||
Occupancy |
1,288 | 1,232 | 56 | 4.5 | % | |||||||||||
Furniture and equipment |
659 | 700 | (41 | ) | -5.9 | % | ||||||||||
Professional services |
1,143 | 932 | 211 | 22.6 | % | |||||||||||
Data processing |
1,527 | 1,399 | 128 | 9.1 | % | |||||||||||
Business development |
890 | 826 | 64 | 7.7 | % | |||||||||||
FDIC Insurance |
1,035 | 1,297 | (262 | ) | -20.2 | % | ||||||||||
Non performing assets |
304 | 285 | 19 | 6.7 | % | |||||||||||
Other |
1,727 | 1,842 | (115 | ) | -6.2 | % | ||||||||||
Total other operating expenses |
$ | 20,686 | $ | 19,270 | $ | 1,416 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||
Total other operating expenses for the six month period ending June 30, 2010, increased as compared
to the six month period ending June 30, 2009.
Salaries, wages, and employee benefits increased for the six month period ending June 30, 2010, as
compared to the six month period ending June 30, 2009. The increase is the result of increased
salary expense, employer FICA expense, group medical and dental benefits, performance bonus,
deferred compensation, and employee relations. Salary expense, employer FICA expense, and group
medical and dental benefits increased due to an increase in full-time equivalent employees of 15
from 252 at June 30, 2009, compared to 267 at June 30, 2010. In addition, many employees receive
their annual merit raises in the first quarter of each year. Deferred compensation increased due
to the issuance of restricted stock during the second quarter of 2009. The increase is partially
offset by a decrease in contract labor and direct loan origination costs.
Occupancy expense increased for the six month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to the six
month period ending June 30, 2009. The increase is due to an increase in building and improvements
depreciation expense due to the opening of the banking center located at 11701 Olio Road in
December 2009, building and property repairs and maintenance, cleaning supplies, management fees,
and utilities. The increase is partially offset by a decrease in real estate taxes, building
operating costs, and leasehold improvements depreciation expense.
Furniture and equipment expense decreased for the six month period ending June 30, 2010, as
compared to the six month period ending June 30, 2009. This decrease is due to a decrease in
depreciation for furniture, fixture, and equipment due to older assets being fully depreciated.
Professional services expense increased for the six month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared
to the six month period ending June 30, 2009. The increase is due to an increase in consulting
fees, advertising agency fees, design services, courier service, and attorney fees.
25
Table of Contents
Data processing expenses increased for the six month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to
the six month period ending June 30, 2009. The increase is due to an increase in bill payment
services, ATM/debit cards, fiduciary income tax preparation for Wealth Management accounts,
computer software, software maintenance, and increased service bureau fees related to increased
activity by the Bank. The increase is partially offset by a decrease in credit cards.
Business development expenses increased for the six month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared
to the six period ending June 30, 2009. The increase is due to an increase in public relations,
direct mail campaign, and sales and product literature. The increase is partially offset by a
decrease in customer entertainment and grand opening expense.
FDIC insurance expense decreased for the six month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to the
six month period ending June 30, 2009. The decrease is due to a special assessment of $557
thousand that was expensed during the second quarter of 2009. The decrease is partially offset by
an overall increase in the FDIC assessment.
Nonperforming assets expenses increased for the six month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared
to the six month period ending June 30, 2009. This increase is due to an increase in expense
related to other real estate owned by the Corporation, such as real estate taxes, lawn maintenance,
and appraisal fees. Also contributing to the increase is an increase in classified loan expense.
The increase is partially offset by gains on the sale of other real estate and a decrease in the
write down of the carrying value of other real estate owned.
Other expenses decreased for the six month period ending June 30, 2010, as compared to the six
period ending June 30, 2009. During the six month period ending June 30, 2009, the Corporation
recorded a loss of $40 thousand a result of the Heartland Payment Systems credit card software
compromise and a charge of $50 thousand related to certain deposit accounts. Also contributing to
the decrease was a decrease in office supplies, loan collection expense, correspondent bank
charges, employment agency fees, and postage expense. The decrease is partially offset by an
increase in telephone service, stationery and printing, personal property taxes, and corporate
client adjustments.
Federal and State Income Tax
The statutory rate reconciliation is as
follows:
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) before federal and state
income tax |
$ | 979 | $ | (180 | ) | $ | 1,676 | $ | 871 | |||||||
Tax expense at federal statutory rate |
333 | (61 | ) | 570 | 296 | |||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from: |
||||||||||||||||
State income tax |
29 | (27 | ) | 54 | 6 | |||||||||||
Tax exempt interest |
(217 | ) | (173 | ) | (395 | ) | (346 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
(2 | ) | 2 | (11 | ) | (9 | ) | |||||||||
Total income tax (benefit) |
$ | 143 | $ | (259 | ) | $ | 218 | $ | (53 | ) | ||||||
Financial Condition
Total assets increased $59.0 million from $1.234 billion at December 31, 2009, to $1.293 billion at
June 30, 2010. The increase is the result of an increase of $29.2 million in cash and cash
equivalents from $151.6 million at December 31, 2009, to $180.8 million at June 30, 2010, and an
increase of $24.2 million in loans from $864.7 million at December 31, 2009, to $888.9 million at
June 30, 2010. Contributing to the increase in cash and cash equivalents is an increase of $55.0
million in deposits from $1.052 billion at December 31, 2009, to $1.107 billion at June 30, 2010.
The increase in deposits is due to new deposit relationships, funds coming from Dreyfus sweep
accounts, and funds flowing back into the Bank that left last year during the overall financial
crisis in the U.S.
26
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Interest Rate Sensitivity
The Corporation must maintain an adequate liquidity position in order to respond to the short-term
demand for funds caused by withdrawals from deposit accounts, extensions of credit and for the
payment of operating expenses. Maintaining an adequate liquidity position is accomplished through
the management of the liquid assets those which can be converted into cash and access to
additional sources of funds. The Corporation must monitor its liquidity ratios as established in
the Asset/Liability (ALCO) Committee Policy. In addition, the Corporation has established a
contingency funding plan to address liquidity needs in the event of depressed economic conditions.
The liquidity position is continually monitored and reviewed by ALCO.
The Corporation has many sources of funds available, they include: cash and due from Federal
Reserve, overnight federal funds sold, investments available for sale, maturity of investments held
for sale, deposits, Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances, and issuance of debt. Deposits were
the most significant funding source and loans were the most significant use of funds during the six
month period ending June 30, 2010. During the six month period ending June 30, 2009, deposits were
the most significant funding source and purchases of investment securities available for sale were
the most significant use of funds.
On June 29, 2007, the Corporation entered into a $5.0 million revolving loan agreement with U.S.
Bank, which matured on June 27, 2009, and was renewed and matured on August 31, 2009. The
revolving loan agreement was used to provide additional liquidity support to the Corporation, if
needed. On September 5, 2008, and December 11, 2008, the Corporation drew $1.3 million and $2.9
million, respectively, on the revolving loan agreement with U.S. Bank.
On August 31, 2009, U.S. Bank renewed the revolving loan agreement which will mature on August 31,
2010. As part of the renewal of the revolving loan agreement, U.S. Bank reduced the revolving loan
amount from $5.0 million to $2.0 million. Of the $4.0 million outstanding, $3.0 million was moved
to a separate one-year term facility with principal payments of $62.5 thousand and interest
payments due quarterly. Under the terms of the one-year term facility, the Corporation pays prime
plus 1.25% which equated to 4.50% at June 30, 2010.
Under the terms of the revolving loan agreement, the Corporation paid prime minus 1.25% which
equated to 2.00% through August 31, 2009, and interest payments were due quarterly. Beginning
September 1, 2009, the Corporation pays prime plus 1.25% which equated to 4.50% at June 30, 2010.
In addition, beginning October 1, 2009, U.S. Bank assessed a 0.25% fee on the unused portion of the
revolving line of credit.
The loan agreements contain various financial and non-financial covenants. One of the covenants
requires the Bank to maintain a loan loss reserve to non-performing loans at a minimum of 100%.
The Bank was in violation of this covenant as of June 30, 2010, as the loan loss reserve to
non-performing loans was 98.17%.
At this time, U.S. Bank has not indicated an intention to exercise any of its remedies available
under the credit facility as a result of the Corporations covenant violation. The remedies
available to U.S. Bank are: make the note immediately due and payable; termination of the
obligation to extend further credit; and/or invoke default interest rate of 3.0% over current
interest rate. Management does not believe the impact of any of these remedies would have a
material impact on the Corporations results of operation or financial position and is currently
discussing a waiver for these covenant violations with U.S. Bank.
Primary liquid assets of the Corporation are cash and due from banks, federal funds sold,
investments held as available for sale, and maturing loans. Due from the Federal Reserve
represented the Corporations primary source of immediate liquidity and averaged $140 million for
the six month period ending June 30, 2010. During the six month period ending June 30, 2009, Due
from the Federal Reserve was the Corporations primary source of immediate liquidity and averaged
$60 million for the six month period ending June 30, 2009. The Corporation believes these balances
are maintained at a level adequate to meet immediate needs. Reverse repurchase agreements may serve
as a source of liquidity, but are primarily used as collateral for customer balances in overnight
repurchase agreements. Maturities in the Corporations loan and investment portfolios are
monitored regularly to avoid matching short-term deposits with long-term investments. Other assets
and liabilities are also monitored to provide the proper balance between liquidity, safety, and
profitability. This monitoring process must be continuous due to the constant flow of cash which
is inherent in a financial institution.
The Corporations management believes its liquidity sources are adequate to meet its operating
needs and does not know of any trends, events or uncertainties that may result in a significant
adverse effect on the Corporations liquidity position.
27
Table of Contents
The Corporation actively manages its interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities to reduce the
impact of interest rate fluctuations. At June 30, 2010, the Corporations rate sensitive
liabilities exceeded rate sensitive assets due within one year by $110.5 million.
As part of managing liquidity, the Corporation monitors its loan to deposit ratio on a daily basis.
At June 30, 2010, the ratio was 80.3%.
The Corporation experienced an increase in cash and cash equivalents, another primary source of
liquidity, of $29.2 million during the six month period ending June 30, 2010. The increase is
primarily due to a net increase in deposits. Deposit growth provided net cash of $55.0 million and
proceeds from the maturity of investment securities provided cash of $18.8 million. Lending
activities used cash of $31.5 million and purchases of investment securities used cash of $28.7
million.
The purpose of the Banks Investment Committee is to manage and balance interest rate risk of the
investment portfolio, to provide a readily available source of liquidity to cover deposit runoff
and loan growth, and to provide a portfolio of safe, secure assets of high quality that generate a
supplemental source of income in concert with the overall asset/liability policies and strategies
of the Bank.
Capital Resources
The Corporation has a $2.0 million revolving line of credit and a $3.0 million one-year term loan
with U.S. Bank. See Liquidity and Interest Rate Sensitivity section of this report for further
discussion.
On June 29, 2007, the Bank entered into a Subordinated Debenture Purchase Agreement with U.S. Bank
in the amount of $5.0 million, which will mature on June 28, 2017. Under the terms of the
Subordinated Debenture Purchase Agreement, the Bank pays 3-month LIBOR plus 1.20% which equated to
1.51% at June 30, 2010. Interest payments are due quarterly.
In September 2000, the Trust, which is wholly owned by the Corporation, issued $13.5 million of
company obligated mandatorily redeemable capital securities. The proceeds from the issuance of the
capital securities and the proceeds from the issuance of the common securities of $418 thousand
were used by the Trust to purchase from the Corporation $13.9 million Fixed Rate Junior
Subordinated Debentures. The capital securities mature September 7, 2030, or upon earlier
redemption as provided by the Indenture. The Corporation has the right to redeem the capital
securities, in whole or in part, but in all cases in a principal amount with integral multiples of
a thousand dollars on any March 7 or September 7 on or after September 7, 2010, at a premium,
declining ratably to par on September 7, 2020. The capital securities and the debentures have a
fixed interest rate of 10.60% and are guaranteed by the Bank. The net proceeds received by the
Corporation from the sale of capital securities were used for general corporate purposes.
There were no FHLB advances outstanding as of June 30, 2010, or 2009.
The Bank may add indebtedness of this nature in the future if determined to be in the best interest
of the Bank.
Capital for the Bank is at or above the well capitalized regulatory requirements at June 30, 2010.
Pertinent capital ratios for the Bank as of June 30, 2010, are as follows:
Well | Adequately | |||||||||||
Actual | Capitalized | Capitalized | ||||||||||
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio |
9.2 | % | 6.0 | % | 4.0 | % | ||||||
Total risk-based capital ratio |
11.0 | % | 10.0 | % | 8.0 | % | ||||||
Leverage ratio |
6.8 | % | 5.0 | % | 4.0 | % |
Dividends from the Bank to the Corporation may not exceed the net undivided profits of the Bank
(included in consolidated retained earnings) for the current calendar year and the two previous
calendar years without prior approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. In
addition, Federal banking laws limit the amount of loans the Bank may make to the Corporation,
subject to certain collateral requirements. No loans were made by the Bank to the Corporation
during the six month period ending June 30, 2010 or 2009. The Bank declared and made a $743
thousand and $695 thousand dividend to the Corporation during the six month period ending June 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively.
28
Table of Contents
On November 20, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted a new three-year stock repurchase program for
directors and employees. Under the new stock repurchase program, the Corporation may repurchase
shares in individually negotiated transactions from time to time as such shares become available
and spend up to $8 million to repurchase such shares over the three-year term. Subject to the $8
million limitation, the Corporation intends to purchase shares recently acquired by the selling
shareholder pursuant to the exercise of stock options or the vesting of restricted stock, and limit
its acquisition of shares which were not recently acquired by the selling shareholder pursuant to
the exercise of stock options or the vesting of shares of restricted stock to no more than 10,000
shares per year. Under the new repurchase plan, the Corporation purchased 9,969 shares during the
six month period ending June 30, 2010, and $5.5 million is still available under the new repurchase
plan as of June 30, 2010. The stock repurchase program does not require the Corporation to acquire
any specific number of shares and may be modified, suspended, extended or terminated by the
Corporation at any time without prior notice. The repurchase program will terminate on December
31, 2011, unless earlier suspended or discontinued by the Corporation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Developments
Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 discusses new accounting policies
adopted by the Corporation during the second quarter of 2010 and the expected impact of the
adoption of the new accounting policies.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss due to adverse changes in market prices and rates. The
Corporations market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk inherent in its lending and
deposit taking activities. Management actively monitors and manages its interest rate exposure and
makes monthly reports to ALCO. ALCO is responsible for reviewing the interest rate sensitivity
position and establishing policies to monitor and limit exposure to interest rate risk. The
guidelines established by ALCO are reviewed by the ALCO/Investment Committee of the Corporations
Board of Directors.
The Corporations profitability is affected by fluctuations in interest rates. A sudden and
substantial increase in interest rates may adversely impact the Corporations earnings to the
extent that the interest rates earned by assets and paid on liabilities do not change at the same
speed, to the same extent, or on the same basis. The Corporation monitors the impact of changes in
interest rates on its net interest income. The Corporation attempts to maintain a relatively
neutral gap between earning assets and liabilities at various time intervals to minimize the
effects of interest rate risk. One of the primary goals of asset/liability management is to
maximize net interest income and the net value of future cash flows within authorized risk limits.
Net interest income is affected by changes in the absolute level of interest rates. Net interest
income is also subject to changes in the shape of the yield curve. In general, a flattening of the
yield curve would result in a decline in earnings due to the compression of earning asset yields
and funding rates, while a steepening would result in increased earnings as investment margins
widen. Earnings are also affected by changes in spread relationships between certain rate indices,
such as prime rate.
At June 30, 2010, the interest rate risk position of the Corporation was liability sensitive,
meaning net income should decrease as rates rise and increase as rates fall. The Corporation
performs a 200 basis point upward and downward interest rate shock to determine whether there would
be an adverse impact on its annual net income and that it is within the established policy limits.
A downward interest rate shock scenario was not performed due to the low level of current interest
rates. The earnings simulation model as of June 30, 2010, projects an approximate decrease of
35.1% in net income in a 200 basis point upward interest rate shock. The Corporation was in
violation of its policy limits established by the ALCO policy at June 30, 2010. Management
believes there is a 0.00% probability that interest rates would rise 200 basis points immediately.
Management performs additional interest rate scenarios that have higher probabilities of
occurrence. In these rate scenarios, the change to net income is within established limits.
See Liquidity and Interest Rate Sensitivity section of this report for further discussion.
There have been no material changes in the quantitative analysis used by the Corporation since
filing the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, (the
2009 Form 10-K); for further discussion of the quantitative analysis used by the Corporation
refer to page 55 of the 2009 Form 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 12, 2010.
29
Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Corporations management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective disclosure
controls and procedures, as defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. As of June 30, 2010, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the
participation of management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporations disclosure controls
and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial
officer concluded that the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2010,
were effective in ensuring information required to be disclosed in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported on a timely basis.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
quarter ended June 30, 2010, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Corporations internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
The Corporations management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, does not expect that the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures and other
internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of
the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that
there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their
costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the
Corporation have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in
decision making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.
Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of
two or more people, or by management override of the control.
The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can only be reasonable assurance that any design will
succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, control may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies
or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost effective control
system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Part II Other Information.
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Neither the Corporation nor its subsidiaries are involved in any pending material
legal proceedings at this time, other than routine litigation incidental to their
business. |
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The Recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act may
have a material impact on our operations. |
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Reform Act) into law. This new law
broadly affects the financial services industry by establishing a framework for
systemic risk oversight, creating a resolution authority, mandating higher capital
and liquidity requirements, requiring banks to pay increased fees to regulatory
agencies and containing numerous other provisions aimed at strengthening the sound
operation of the financial services sector. The full impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on
our business and operations may not be known for years until regulations
implementing the statute are written and adopted. The Dodd-Frank Act may have a
material impact on our operations, particularly through increased compliance costs. |
30
Table of Contents
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) |
On April 16, 2010,
the Corporation
sold a total of
1,600 shares of
common stock for
proceeds of $44,400
to one officer of
the Corporation pursuant to the exercise of stock options by the officer. |
||
On May 24, 2010,
the Corporation
sold a total of
2,000 shares of
common stock for
proceeds of $45,000
to one director of
the Corporation pursuant to the exercise of stock options by the officer. |
|||
On June 17, 2010, the Corporation sold a total of 2,000 shares of common
stock for proceeds of $45,000 to one director of the Corporation pursuant to
the exercise of stock options by the officer. |
|||
These sales were made pursuant to Section 4(2) and Securities 3(a)(11) of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. |
|||
(b) | Not applicable. |
||
(c) | On November 20, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted a new
three-year stock repurchase program for directors and employees. Under the new
stock repurchase program, the Corporation may repurchase shares in individually
negotiated transactions from time to time as such shares become available and
spend up to $8 million to repurchase such shares over the three-year term.
Subject to the $8 million limitation, the Corporation intends to purchase
shares recently acquired by the selling shareholder pursuant to the exercise of
stock options or the vesting of restricted stock, and limit its acquisition of
shares which were not recently acquired by the selling shareholder pursuant to
the exercise of stock options or the vesting of shares of restricted stock to
no more than 10,000 shares per year. Under the new repurchase plan, the
Corporation purchased 9,969 shares during the six month period ending June 30,
2010, and $5.5 million is still available under the new repurchase plan as of
June 30, 2010. The stock repurchase program does not require the Corporation
to acquire any specific number of shares and may be modified, suspended,
extended or terminated by the Corporation at any time without prior notice.
The repurchase program will terminate on December 31, 2011, unless earlier
suspended or discontinued by the Corporation. |
31
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the issuer repurchases of equity securities
that are registered by the Corporation pursuant to Section 12 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the second quarter of 2010. |
Maximum | ||||||||||||||||
Number (or | ||||||||||||||||
Approximate | ||||||||||||||||
Total | Dollar Value) | |||||||||||||||
Number of | of Shares that | |||||||||||||||
Shares | May Yet Be | |||||||||||||||
Purchased as | Purchased | |||||||||||||||
Part of | Under the | |||||||||||||||
Total | Publicly | Plans or | ||||||||||||||
Number of | Average | Announced | Programs | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price Paid | Plans of | (Dollars in | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased | per Share | Programs** | thousands) | ||||||||||||
April 1 -
April 30, 2010 |
1,834 | $ | 39.19 | 1,834 | $ | 5,657 | ||||||||||
May 1 -
May 31, 2010 |
784 | $ | 39.94 | 784 | $ | 5,625 | ||||||||||
June 1 -
June 30, 2010 |
2,643 | $ | 38.11 | 2,643 | $ | 5,525 | ||||||||||
Total |
5,261 | * | 5,261 | |||||||||||||
* | The weighted average price per share for the period April 2010 through June 2010 was $38.76. |
|
** | All shares repurchased by the Corporation during 2010 were completed pursuant to the new repurchase program. |
Item 3. Defaults on Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits
3.01
|
Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation, filed as Exhibit 3(i) to the Corporations Form 10-QSB as of September 30, 1995, are incorporated by reference and Articles of Amendment filed as Exhibit 3(i) to the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001. | |
3.02
|
Bylaws of the Corporation, filed as Exhibit 3(ii) to the Corporations Form 8-K filed July 30, 2009, are incorporated by reference. | |
10.01*
|
1993 Key Employees Stock Option Plan of the Corporation, as amended, filed as Exhibit 10(a) to the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, is incorporated by reference. | |
10.02*
|
1993 Directors Stock Option Plan of the Corporation, as amended, filed as Exhibit 10(b) to the Corporations Form 10-Q as of June 30, 2001, is incorporated by reference. | |
10.03*
|
1993 Restricted Stock Plan of the Corporation, as amended, filed as Exhibit 10(c) to the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, is incorporated by reference. |
32
Table of Contents
10.04*
|
Form of agreement under the 1993 Key Employees Stock Option Plan, filed as Exhibit 10(d) to the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, is incorporated by reference. | |
10.05*
|
Form of agreement under the 1993 Restricted Stock Plan, filed as Exhibit 10(e) to the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, is incorporated by reference. | |
10.06*
|
Schedule of Directors Compensation Arrangements, filed as part of the Corporations Form 8-K dated March 17, 2010, is incorporated by reference. | |
10.07*
|
Schedule of Named Executive Officers Compensation Arrangements, filed as Exhibit 10.07 to the Corporations Form 8-K dated May 18, 2006, is incorporated by reference, as amended by the Corporations Form 8-K filed March 17, 2010. | |
10.08*
|
The National Bank of Indianapolis Corporation Amended and Restated 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.01 to the Corporations Form 8-K dated June 23, 2010, is incorporated by reference. | |
10.09*
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for The National Bank of Indianapolis Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.02 to the Corporations Form 8-K dated June 22, 2005, is incorporated by reference. | |
10.10*
|
Form of Stock Option Award Agreement for The National Bank of Indianapolis Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.03 to the Corporations Form 8-K dated June 22, 2005, is incorporated by reference. | |
10.11*
|
Employment Agreement dated December 15, 2005, between Morris L. Maurer and the Corporation, filed as Exhibit 10.06 to the Corporations Form 8-K dated December 21, 2005, and as amended by Exhibit 10.06 to the Corporations Form 8-K dated November 26, 2008, is incorporated by reference. | |
10.13*
|
The National Bank of Indianapolis Corporation Executives Deferred Compensation Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.08 to the Corporations Form 8-K dated December 21, 2005, and as amended by Exhibit 10.08 to the Corporations Form 8-K dated November 26, 2008, is incorporated by reference. | |
10.14*
|
The National Bank of Indianapolis Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan (as amended and restated generally effective January 1, 2006), filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the Corporations Form 10-K dated December 31, 2005, is incorporated by reference. | |
31.1
|
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
31.2
|
Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
32.1
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | |
32.2
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
* | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
33
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: August 6, 2010
THE NATIONAL BANK OF INDIANAPOLIS CORPORATION |
||||
/s/ Debra L. Ross | ||||
Debra L. Ross | ||||
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
34
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
3.01
|
Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation, filed as Exhibit 3(i) to the Corporations Form 10-QSB as of September 30, 1995, are incorporated by reference and Articles of Amendment filed as Exhibit 3(i) to the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001. | |
3.02
|
Bylaws of the Corporation, filed as Exhibit 3(ii) to the Corporations Form 8-K filed July 30, 2009, are incorporated by reference. | |
10.01*
|
1993 Key Employees Stock Option Plan of the Corporation, as amended, filed as Exhibit 10(a) to the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, is incorporated by reference. | |
10.02*
|
1993 Directors Stock Option Plan of the Corporation, as amended, filed as Exhibit 10(b) to the Corporations Form 10-Q as of June 30, 2001, is incorporated by reference. | |
10.03*
|
1993 Restricted Stock Plan of the Corporation, as amended, filed as Exhibit 10(c) to the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, is incorporated by reference. | |
10.04*
|
Form of agreement under the 1993 Key Employees Stock Option Plan, filed as Exhibit 10(d) to the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, is incorporated by reference. | |
10.05*
|
Form of agreement under the 1993 Restricted Stock Plan, filed as Exhibit 10(e) to the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, is incorporated by reference. | |
10.06*
|
Schedule of Directors Compensation Arrangements, filed as part of the Corporations Form 8-K dated March 17, 2010, is incorporated by reference. | |
10.07*
|
Schedule of Named Executive Officers Compensation Arrangements, filed as Exhibit 10.07 to the Corporations Form 8-K dated May 18, 2006, is incorporated by reference, as amended by the Corporations Form 8-K filed March 17, 2010. | |
10.08*
|
The National Bank of Indianapolis Corporation Amended and Restated 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.01 to the Corporations Form 8-K dated June 23, 2010, is incorporated by reference. | |
10.09*
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for The National Bank of Indianapolis Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.02 to the Corporations Form 8-K dated June 22, 2005, is incorporated by reference. | |
10.10*
|
Form of Stock Option Award Agreement for The National Bank of Indianapolis Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.03 to the Corporations Form 8-K dated June 22, 2005, is incorporated by reference. | |
10.11*
|
Employment Agreement dated December 15, 2005, between Morris L. Maurer and the Corporation, filed as Exhibit 10.06 to the Corporations Form 8-K dated December 21, 2005, and as amended by Exhibit 10.06 to the Corporations Form 8-K dated November 26, 2008, is incorporated by reference. | |
10.13*
|
The National Bank of Indianapolis Corporation Executives Deferred Compensation Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.08 to the Corporations Form 8-K dated December 21, 2005, and as amended by Exhibit 10.08 to the Corporations Form 8-K dated November 26, 2008, is incorporated by reference. |
35
Table of Contents
10.14*
|
The National Bank of Indianapolis Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan (as amended and restated generally effective January 1, 2006), filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the Corporations Form 10-K dated December 31, 2005, is incorporated by reference. | |
31.1
|
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
31.2
|
Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
32.1
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | |
32.2
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
* | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
36