Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-23.2 - EX-23.2 - FOSTER WHEELER AG | y85298exv23w2.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - FOSTER WHEELER AG | y85298exv31w2.htm |
EX-10.4 - EX-10.4 - FOSTER WHEELER AG | y85298exv10w4.htm |
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - FOSTER WHEELER AG | y85298exv32w2.htm |
EX-10.5 - EX-10.5 - FOSTER WHEELER AG | y85298exv10w5.htm |
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - FOSTER WHEELER AG | y85298exv32w1.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - FOSTER WHEELER AG | y85298exv31w1.htm |
EX-10.9 - EX-10.9 - FOSTER WHEELER AG | y85298exv10w9.htm |
EX-10.6 - EX-10.6 - FOSTER WHEELER AG | y85298exv10w6.htm |
EX-23.1 - EX-23.1 - FOSTER WHEELER AG | y85298exv23w1.htm |
EX-10.3 - EX-10.3 - FOSTER WHEELER AG | y85298exv10w3.htm |
XML - IDEA: UNKNOWN FILE - FOSTER WHEELER AG | 0000950123-10-073102_errorLog.txt |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ____ to ____
Commission File Number 001-31305
FOSTER WHEELER AG
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Switzerland | 98-0607469 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
80 Rue de Lausanne | ||
CH 1202 Geneva, Switzerland | 1202 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
41 22 741 8000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date: 127,521,939 registered shares (CHF 3.00 par value) were outstanding
as of July 23, 2010.
FOSTER WHEELER AG
INDEX
INDEX
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Fiscal Quarters Ended | Fiscal Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | 1,005,496 | $ | 1,308,801 | $ | 1,951,069 | $ | 2,573,324 | ||||||||
Cost of operating revenues |
857,636 | 1,088,842 | 1,631,127 | 2,190,613 | ||||||||||||
Contract profit |
147,860 | 219,959 | 319,942 | 382,711 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
69,515 | 69,024 | 139,820 | 138,272 | ||||||||||||
Other income, net |
(11,419 | ) | (11,490 | ) | (19,751 | ) | (19,693 | ) | ||||||||
Other deductions, net |
8,049 | 6,898 | 19,737 | 12,985 | ||||||||||||
Interest income |
(2,730 | ) | (2,426 | ) | (5,089 | ) | (5,098 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense |
4,044 | 1,302 | 8,595 | 5,469 | ||||||||||||
Net asbestos-related provision |
2,344 | 1,756 | 1,597 | 3,506 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
78,057 | 154,895 | 175,033 | 247,270 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
15,409 | 27,561 | 37,019 | 45,564 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
62,648 | 127,334 | 138,014 | 201,706 | ||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable
to noncontrolling interests |
3,790 | 5,130 | 7,096 | 6,639 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG |
$ | 58,858 | $ | 122,204 | $ | 130,918 | $ | 195,067 | ||||||||
Earnings per share (see Note 1): |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.46 | $ | 0.97 | $ | 1.03 | $ | 1.54 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.46 | $ | 0.96 | $ | 1.02 | $ | 1.54 | ||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current Assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 973,913 | $ | 997,158 | ||||
Short-term investments |
240 | | ||||||
Accounts and notes receivable, net: |
||||||||
Trade |
478,975 | 526,525 | ||||||
Other |
104,038 | 117,718 | ||||||
Contracts in process |
195,336 | 219,774 | ||||||
Prepaid, deferred and refundable income taxes |
40,214 | 46,478 | ||||||
Other current assets |
37,906 | 33,902 | ||||||
Total current assets |
1,830,622 | 1,941,555 | ||||||
Land, buildings and equipment, net |
357,909 | 398,132 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
28,189 | 34,905 | ||||||
Notes and accounts receivable long-term |
1,268 | 1,571 | ||||||
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates |
200,502 | 228,030 | ||||||
Goodwill |
82,220 | 88,702 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net |
67,945 | 73,029 | ||||||
Asbestos-related insurance recovery receivable |
230,112 | 244,265 | ||||||
Other assets |
81,596 | 87,781 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
67,849 | 89,768 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 2,948,212 | $ | 3,187,738 | ||||
LIABILITIES, TEMPORARY EQUITY AND EQUITY |
||||||||
Current Liabilities: |
||||||||
Current installments on long-term debt |
$ | 34,397 | $ | 36,930 | ||||
Accounts payable |
226,421 | 303,436 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
211,374 | 280,861 | ||||||
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts |
581,464 | 600,725 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
30,585 | 60,052 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
1,084,241 | 1,282,004 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
149,871 | 175,510 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
59,273 | 62,956 | ||||||
Pension, postretirement and other employee benefits |
231,912 | 270,269 | ||||||
Asbestos-related liability |
323,947 | 352,537 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
162,782 | 171,405 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
2,012,026 | 2,314,681 | ||||||
Temporary Equity: |
||||||||
Non-vested share-based compensation awards subject to redemption |
7,339 | 2,570 | ||||||
TOTAL TEMPORARY EQUITY |
7,339 | 2,570 | ||||||
Equity: |
||||||||
Registered shares: |
||||||||
CHF 3.00 par value; authorized: June 30, 2010 - 190,729,896 shares
and December 31, 2009 - 190,649,900 shares;
conditionally authorized: June 30, 2010 - 62,101,932 shares
and December 31, 2009 - 62,181,928 shares;
issued and outstanding: June 30, 2010 - 127,521,939 shares
and December 31, 2009 - 127,441,943 shares |
329,630 | 329,402 | ||||||
Paid-in capital |
624,180 | 617,938 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
453,099 | 322,181 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(516,725 | ) | (438,004 | ) | ||||
TOTAL FOSTER WHEELER AG SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
890,184 | 831,517 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
38,663 | 38,970 | ||||||
TOTAL EQUITY |
928,847 | 870,487 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES, TEMPORARY EQUITY AND EQUITY |
$ | 2,948,212 | $ | 3,187,738 | ||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(in thousands of dollars)
(unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(in thousands of dollars)
(unaudited)
Total Foster | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retained Earnings/ | Wheeler AG | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred | Common | Registered | Paid-in | (Accumulated | Accumulated Other | Shareholders' | Noncontrolling | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Shares | Shares | Capital | Deficit) | Comprehensive Loss | Equity | Interests | Total Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Six Months Ended June 30, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 26, 2008 |
$ | | $ | 1,262 | $ | | $ | 914,063 | $ | (27,975 | ) | $ | (494,788 | ) | $ | 392,562 | $ | 28,718 | $ | 421,280 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | 195,067 | | 195,067 | 6,639 | 201,706 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
| | | | | 18,516 | 18,516 | 391 | 18,907 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedges |
| | | | | (1,376 | ) | (1,376 | ) | | (1,376 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension and other postretirement
benefits |
| | | | | 9,615 | 9,615 | (4 | ) | 9,611 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive Income |
221,822 | 7,026 | 228,848 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares upon
exercise of share purchase warrants |
| | | 9 | | | 9 | | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares upon vesting
of restricted awards |
| 1 | | (1 | ) | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cancellation of common shares and
issuance of registered shares |
| (1,263 | ) | 326,070 | (324,807 | ) | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase and retirement of shares |
| | | (28 | ) | | | (28 | ) | | (28 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of registered shares upon
conversion of preferred shares |
| | 361 | (361 | ) | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of registered shares upon vesting
of restricted awards |
| | 1 | (1 | ) | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of registered shares upon
exercise of share purchase warrants |
| | 57 | 42 | | | 99 | | 99 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | | | (21 | ) | (21 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense
-stock options and restricted awards |
| | | 9,851 | | | 9,851 | | 9,851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
$ | | $ | | $ | 326,489 | $ | 598,767 | $ | 167,092 | $ | (468,033 | ) | $ | 624,315 | $ | 35,723 | $ | 660,038 | |||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Six Months Ended June 30, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
$ | | $ | | $ | 329,402 | $ | 617,938 | $ | 322,181 | $ | (438,004 | ) | $ | 831,517 | $ | 38,970 | $ | 870,487 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | 130,918 | | 130,918 | 7,096 | 138,014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
| | | | | (73,368 | ) | (73,368 | ) | (71 | ) | (73,439 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedges |
| | | | | (2,195 | ) | (2,195 | ) | | (2,195 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension and other postretirement
benefits |
| | | | | (3,158 | ) | (3,158 | ) | (2 | ) | (3,160 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive Income |
52,197 | 7,023 | 59,220 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of registered shares upon
exercise of stock options |
| | 225 | 1,438 | | | 1,663 | | 1,663 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of registered shares upon
vesting of restricted awards |
| | 3 | (3 | ) | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | | | (7,330 | ) | (7,330 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation expense-stock options and restricted awards |
| | | 4,805 | | | 4,805 | | 4,805 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefit related to share-based
compensation |
| | | 2 | | | 2 | | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
$ | | $ | | $ | 329,630 | $ | 624,180 | $ | 453,099 | $ | (516,725 | ) | $ | 890,184 | $ | 38,663 | $ | 928,847 | |||||||||||||||||
See notes
to consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands of dollars)
(unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands of dollars)
(unaudited)
Fiscal Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 138,014 | $ | 201,706 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows
from operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
24,987 | 21,446 | ||||||
Curtailment gain on U.K. defined benefit pension plan |
(20,086 | ) | | |||||
Net asbestos-related provision |
5,622 | 3,506 | ||||||
Share-based compensation expense-stock options and
restricted awards |
9,574 | 10,855 | ||||||
Excess tax benefit related to share-based compensation |
(2 | ) | | |||||
Deferred income tax provision |
20,729 | 1,174 | ||||||
Loss on sale of assets |
79 | 522 | ||||||
Equity in the net earnings of partially-owned affiliates,
net of dividends |
194 | 3,280 | ||||||
Other noncash items |
| (45 | ) | |||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
(Increase)/decrease in receivables |
(2,436 | ) | 87,406 | |||||
Net change in contracts in process and billings in excess of
costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts |
32,035 | (108,869 | ) | |||||
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(96,770 | ) | (121,889 | ) | ||||
Net change in other assets and liabilities |
(60,615 | ) | (5,138 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
51,325 | 93,954 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Payments related to acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired |
(1,221 | ) | (8,883 | ) | ||||
Change in restricted cash |
3,338 | (2,817 | ) | |||||
Capital expenditures |
(9,438 | ) | (26,708 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of assets |
79 | 454 | ||||||
Return of investment from unconsolidated affiliates |
3,232 | | ||||||
Increase in short-term investments |
(238 | ) | (1,261 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(4,248 | ) | (39,215 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Repurchase and retirement of shares |
| (28 | ) | |||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
(7,330 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from share purchase warrants exercised |
| 108 | ||||||
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
2,628 | | ||||||
Excess tax benefit related to share-based compensation |
2 | | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of short-term debt |
2,197 | 2,925 | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
| 1,865 | ||||||
Repayment of debt and capital lease obligations |
(9,880 | ) | (8,682 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(12,383 | ) | (3,833 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(57,939 | ) | 24,916 | |||||
(DECREASE)/INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
(23,245 | ) | 75,822 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
997,158 | 773,163 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
$ | 973,913 | $ | 848,985 | ||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation The fiscal year of Foster Wheeler AG ends on December 31 of each
calendar year. Foster Wheeler AGs fiscal quarters end on the last day of March, June and
September.
Foster Wheeler AGs consolidated financial results for the fiscal quarter represent the period
from April 1 through June 30 for both fiscal years 2010 and 2009; and the fiscal six months
represent the period from January 1, 2010 through June 30, 2010 and December 27, 2008 through June
30, 2009 in fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively. Please refer to Note 1 in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (2009 Form 10-K), filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2010, for further information on our fiscal year
end and related change of country of domicile from Bermuda to Switzerland in February 2009. As
part of our change of country of domicile, we cancelled our common shares and issued registered
shares. In January 2010, we relocated our principal executive offices to Geneva, Switzerland.
The consolidated financial results include our U.S. operations, which have a fiscal year that
is the 52- or 53- week annual accounting period ending the last Friday in December, and our
non-U.S. operations, which have a fiscal year ending December 31.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of such financial statements have
been included. Such adjustments only consisted of normal recurring items. Interim results are not
necessarily indicative of results for a full year.
The financial statements and notes are presented in accordance with the requirements of Form
10-Q and do not contain certain information included in our 2009 Form 10-K. The consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 was derived from the audited financial statements included in
our 2009 Form 10-K, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America for annual consolidated financial statements.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Foster Wheeler AG and all significant U.S. and non-U.S. subsidiaries as well as certain entities in
which we have a controlling interest. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Comprehensive income is comprised of net income, as well as adjustments for foreign currency
translation, derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges and pension and other
postretirement benefits. Comprehensive income for Foster Wheeler AG, noncontrolling interests and
total equity were as follows:
Fiscal Quarters Ended | Fiscal Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Comprehensive Income: |
||||||||||||||||
Foster Wheeler AG |
$ | 24,155 | $ | 158,830 | $ | 52,197 | $ | 221,822 | ||||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
3,167 | 5,688 | 7,023 | 7,026 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 27,322 | $ | 164,518 | $ | 59,220 | $ | 228,848 | ||||||||
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued authoritative
guidance to amend the manner in which entities evaluate whether consolidation is required for
variable interest entities (VIE). The model for determining which enterprise has a controlling
financial interest and is the primary beneficiary of a VIE has changed under the new guidance.
Furthermore, the new guidance requires an ongoing reconsideration of the primary beneficiary and
also amends the events that trigger a reassessment of whether an entity is a VIE. This
revised guidance also requires enhanced disclosures about how a companys involvement with a
VIE affects its
7
Table of Contents
financial statements and exposure to risks. This guidance, which became effective
for us on January 1, 2010, did not result in any change to the entities previously included in our
consolidated financial statements.
Variable Interest Entities We sometimes form separate legal entities such as corporations,
partnerships and limited liability companies in connection with the execution of a single contract
or project. Upon formation of each separate legal entity, we perform an evaluation to determine
whether the new entity is a VIE, and whether we are the primary beneficiary of the new entity,
which would require us to consolidate the new entity in our financial results. We reassess our
initial determination on whether the entity is a VIE and whether we are the primary beneficiary
upon the occurrence of certain events as outlined in current accounting guidelines. If the entity
is not a VIE, we determine the accounting for the entity under the voting interest accounting
guidelines.
An entity is determined to be a VIE if either (a) the total equity investment is not
sufficient for the entity to finance its own activities without additional subordinated financial
support, (b) characteristics of a controlling financial interest are missing (such as the ability
to make decisions through voting or other rights or the obligation to absorb losses or the right to
receive benefits), or (c) the voting rights of the equity holders are not proportional to their
obligations to absorb losses of the entity and/or their rights to receive benefits of the entity,
and substantially all of the entitys activities either involve or are conducted on behalf of an
investor that has disproportionately few voting rights.
As of June 30, 2010, we participated in certain entities determined to be VIEs, including a
gas-fired cogeneration facility in Martinez, California, a waste-to-energy facility in Camden, New
Jersey and a refinery/electric power generation project in Chile. We consolidate the operations of
both the Martinez and Camden projects while we record our participation in the Chile based project
on the equity method of accounting.
Please see Note 3 for further information on our participation in these projects.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and revenues and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could
differ from those estimates. Changes in estimates are reflected in the periods in which they
become known. Significant estimates are used in accounting for long-term contracts including
estimates of total costs, progress toward completion and customer and vendor claims, employee
benefit plan obligations and share-based compensation plans. In addition, we also use estimates
when accounting for uncertain tax positions and deferred taxes, asbestos liabilities and expected
recoveries and when assessing goodwill for impairment, among others.
Revenue Recognition on Long-Term Contracts Revenues and profits on long-term contracts are
recorded under the percentage-of-completion method.
Progress towards completion on fixed-price contracts is measured based on physical completion
of individual tasks for all contracts with a value of $5,000 or greater. For contracts with a
value less than $5,000, progress toward completion is measured based on the ratio of costs incurred
to total estimated contract costs (the cost-to-cost method).
Progress towards completion on cost-reimbursable contracts is measured based on the ratio of
quantities expended to total forecasted quantities, typically man-hours. Incentives are also
recognized on a percentage-of-completion basis when the realization of an incentive is assessed as
probable. We include flow-through costs consisting of materials, equipment or subcontractor
services as both operating revenues and cost of operating revenues on cost-reimbursable contracts
when we have overall responsibility as the contractor for the engineering specifications and
procurement or procurement services for such costs. There is no contract profit impact of
flow-through costs as they are included in both operating revenues and cost of operating revenues.
Contracts in process are stated at cost, increased for profits recorded on the completed
effort or decreased for estimated losses, less billings to the customer and progress payments on
uncompleted contracts.
8
Table of Contents
At any point, we have numerous contracts in progress, all of which are at various stages of
completion. Accounting for revenues and profits on long-term contracts requires estimates of total
estimated contract costs and estimates of progress toward completion to determine the extent of
revenue and profit recognition. These estimates may be revised as additional information becomes
available or as specific project circumstances change. We review all of our material contracts on
a monthly basis and revise our estimates as appropriate for developments such as earning project
incentive bonuses, incurring or expecting to incur contractual liquidated damages for performance
or schedule issues, providing services and purchasing third-party materials and equipment at costs
differing from those previously estimated and testing completed facilities, which, in turn,
eliminates or confirms completion and warranty-related costs. Project incentives are recognized
when it is probable they will be earned. Project incentives are frequently tied to cost, schedule
and/or safety targets and, therefore, tend to be earned late in a projects life cycle.
Changes in estimated final contract revenues and costs can either increase or decrease the
final estimated contract profit. In the period in which a change in estimate is recognized, the
cumulative impact of that change is recorded based on progress achieved through the period of
change. There were 25 and 19 separate projects that had final estimated contract profit revisions
whose impact on contract profit exceeded $1,000 during the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2010
and 2009, respectively. The changes in final estimated contract profit resulted in net increases
of $8,600 and $33,700 to reported contract profit in the fiscal quarter and six months ended June
30, 2010, respectively, relating to the revaluation of work performed on contracts in prior
periods. The changes in final estimated contract profit resulted in net increases of $20,200 and
$26,200 to reported contract profit in the fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009,
respectively, relating to the revaluation of work performed on contracts in prior periods. Please
see Note 11 for further information related to changes in final estimated contract profit.
Claims are amounts in excess of the agreed contract price (or amounts not included in the
original contract price) that we seek to collect from customers or others for delays, errors in
specifications and designs, contract terminations, disputed or unapproved change orders as to both
scope and price or other causes of unanticipated additional costs. We record claims as additional
contract revenue if it is probable that the claims will result in additional contract revenue and
if the amount can be reliably estimated. These two requirements are satisfied by the existence of
all of the following conditions: the contract or other evidence provides a legal basis for the
claim; additional costs are caused by circumstances that were unforeseen at the contract date and
are not the result of deficiencies in our performance; costs associated with the claim are
identifiable or otherwise determinable and are reasonable in view of the work performed; and the
evidence supporting the claim is objective and verifiable. If such requirements are met, revenue
from a claim may be recorded only to the extent that contract costs relating to the claim have been
incurred. Costs attributable to claims are treated as costs of contract performance as incurred
and are recorded in contracts in process. As of June 30, 2010, our consolidated financial
statements assumed recovery of commercial claims of approximately $15,700, of which approximately
$4,000 had yet to be expended. As of December 31, 2009, our consolidated financial statements
assumed recovery of commercial claims of approximately $18,700, of which $1,200 had yet to be
expended.
In certain circumstances, we may defer pre-contract costs when it is probable that these costs
will be recovered under a future contract. Such deferred costs would then be included in contract
costs upon execution of the anticipated contract. We had approximately $200 and $1,200 of deferred
pre-contract costs as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Certain special-purpose subsidiaries in our global power business group are reimbursed by
customers for their costs, including amounts related to repayments of non-recourse project debt,
for building and operating certain facilities over the lives of the corresponding service
contracts.
Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid short-term
investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of acquisition. Cash and
cash equivalents of $775,406 and $772,565 were maintained by our non-U.S. entities as of June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. These entities require a portion of these funds to
support their liquidity and working capital needs, as well as to comply with required minimum
capitalization and contractual restrictions. Accordingly, a portion of these funds may not be
readily available for repatriation to U.S. entities.
Intangible Assets Intangible assets consist principally of goodwill, trademarks and
patents. Goodwill is allocated to our reporting units on a relative fair value basis at the time
of the original purchase price allocation. Patents and trademarks are amortized on a straight-line
basis over periods of 3 to 40 years. Customer relationships, pipeline and backlog are amortized on
a straight-line basis over periods of 1 to 13 years.
9
Table of Contents
We test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is defined as the
components one level below our operating segments, because these components constitute businesses
for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the
operating results of those components. Presently, goodwill exists in
two of our reporting units
one within our Global Power Group business segment and one within our Global Engineering and
Construction Group, which we refer to as our Global E&C Group, business segment.
The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment
test, used to identify potential impairment, compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its
carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value exceeds the carrying amount, goodwill is
not considered impaired. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, the second step must be
performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the
implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. In
the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, we evaluate goodwill at each reporting unit to assess
recoverability, and impairments, if any, are recognized in earnings. An impairment loss would be
recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the carrying amount of the goodwill over the implied
fair value of the goodwill. As of December 31, 2009, the estimated fair value of each of the
reporting units was sufficiently in excess of its carrying values even after conducting various
sensitivity analyses on key assumptions, such that no adjustment to the carrying values of goodwill
was required.
Please see Note 4 for further information related to our goodwill and other identifiable
intangible assets.
Income Taxes Deferred tax assets/liabilities are established for the difference between the
financial reporting and income tax basis of assets and liabilities, as well as for operating loss
and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of
changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management,
it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. In evaluating our ability to realize our deferred tax assets within the various tax
jurisdictions in which they arise, we consider all available positive and negative evidence,
including scheduled reversals of taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income,
tax planning strategies and recent financial performance. Projecting future taxable income
requires significant assumptions about future operating results, as well as the timing and
character of taxable income in numerous jurisdictions.
We do not make a provision for incremental income taxes on subsidiary earnings, which have
been retained in the subsidiarys country of domicile, if we expect such earnings to be
indefinitely reinvested in that jurisdiction.
We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not
that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the
technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from
such a position are based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood
of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
We recognize interest accrued on the potential tax liability related to unrecognized tax
benefits in interest expense, and we recognize any potential penalties in other deductions, net on
our consolidated statement of operations.
Foreign Currency The functional currency of our non-U.S. operations is typically the local
currency of their country of domicile. Assets and liabilities of our non-U.S. subsidiaries are
translated into U.S. dollars at period-end exchange rates with the resulting translation adjustment
recorded as a separate component within accumulated other comprehensive loss. Income and expense
accounts and cash flows are translated at weighted-average exchange rates for the period.
Transaction gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated
in a currency other than the functional currency are included in other deductions, net on our
consolidated statement of operations.
Fair Value Measurements Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell
an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at
the measurement date. Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification, or
FASB ASC, 820-10 defines fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs
used to measure fair value and provides guidance on required disclosures about fair value
measurements. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.
10
Table of Contents
Our financial assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis
consist primarily of the assets or liabilities arising from derivative financial instruments and
defined benefit pension plan assets. We value our derivative financial instruments using broker
quotations, or market transactions in either the listed or over-the-counter markets, resulting in
fair value measurements using level 2 inputs as defined under the fair value hierarchy. See Note 8
for further information regarding our derivative financial instruments.
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of
financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate fair value:
Financial instruments valued independent of the fair value hierarchy:
| Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash The carrying value of our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash approximates fair value because of the demand nature of many of our deposits or short-term maturity of these instruments. |
Financial instruments valued within the fair value hierarchy:
| Short-term Investments Short-term investments primarily consist of deposits with maturities in excess of three months but less than one year. Short-term investments are carried at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value. | ||
| Long-term Debt We estimate the fair value of our long-term debt (including current installments) based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered for debt of the same remaining maturities using level 2 inputs. | ||
| Foreign Currency Forward Contracts We estimate the fair value of foreign currency forward contracts by obtaining quotes from financial institutions or market transactions in either the listed or over-the-counter markets, which we further corroborate with observable market data using level 2 inputs. | ||
| Interest Rate Swaps We estimate the fair value of our interest rate swaps based on quotes obtained from financial institutions, which we further corroborate with observable market data using level 2 inputs. | ||
| Defined Benefit Pension Plan Assets We estimate the fair value of our defined benefit pension plan assets at each fiscal year end based on quotes obtained from financial institutions, which we further corroborate with observable market data using level 1 and 2 inputs. |
Retirement of Shares under Share Repurchase Program On September 12, 2008, we announced a
share repurchase program pursuant to which our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up
to $750,000 of our outstanding shares and the designation of the repurchased shares for
cancellation. Based on the aggregate share repurchases under our program through June 30, 2010,
we are authorized to repurchase up to $264,773 of our outstanding shares. Any repurchases will be
made at our discretion in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions in compliance
with applicable securities laws and other legal requirements and will depend on a variety of
factors, including market conditions, share price and other factors. The program does not
obligate us to acquire any particular number of shares. The program has no expiration date and may
be suspended or discontinued at any time.
All shares acquired under our share repurchase program have been retired upon purchase. The
share value, on the consolidated balance sheet, was reduced for the par value of the retired
shares. Paid-in capital, on the consolidated balance sheet, was reduced for the excess of fair
value and related fees paid above par value for the shares acquired.
Shares retired under the share repurchase program reduce the weighted-average number of shares
outstanding during the reporting period when calculating earnings per share, as described below.
Earnings per Share Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable
to Foster Wheeler AG by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the reporting
period, excluding non-vested restricted shares. There were no non-vested restricted shares as of
June 30, 2010 and 82,980 non-vested restricted shares as of June 30, 2009. Restricted shares and
restricted share units (collectively, restricted awards) are included in the weighted-average
number of shares outstanding when such restricted awards vest.
11
Table of Contents
Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to Foster
Wheeler AG by the combination of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the
reporting period and the impact of dilutive securities, if any, such as outstanding stock options,
warrants to purchase shares and the non-vested portion of restricted awards to the extent such
securities are dilutive.
In profitable periods, outstanding stock options and warrants have a dilutive effect under the
treasury stock method when the average share price for the period exceeds the assumed proceeds from
the exercise of the warrant or option. The assumed proceeds include the exercise price,
compensation cost, if any, for future service that has not yet been recognized in the consolidated
statement of operations, and any tax benefits that would be recorded in paid-in capital when the
option or warrant is exercised. Under the treasury stock method, the assumed proceeds are assumed
to be used to repurchase shares in the current period. The dilutive impact of the non-vested
portion of restricted awards is determined using the treasury stock method, but the proceeds
include only the unrecognized compensation cost and tax benefits as assumed proceeds.
The computations of basic and diluted earnings per share were as follows:
Fiscal Quarters Ended | Fiscal Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG |
$ | 58,858 | $ | 122,204 | $ | 130,918 | $ | 195,067 | ||||||||
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding
for basic earnings per share |
127,519,766 | 126,344,093 | 127,497,450 | 126,304,157 | ||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.46 | $ | 0.97 | $ | 1.03 | $ | 1.54 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG |
$ | 58,858 | $ | 122,204 | $ | 130,918 | $ | 195,067 | ||||||||
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding
for basic earnings per share |
127,519,766 | 126,344,093 | 127,497,450 | 126,304,157 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Options to purchase shares |
185,598 | 47,465 | 243,292 | 21,821 | ||||||||||||
Warrants to purchase shares |
| 478,728 | | 474,067 | ||||||||||||
Non-vested portion of restricted awards |
173,912 | 184,892 | 119,136 | 67,237 | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding
for diluted earnings per share |
127,879,276 | 127,055,178 | 127,859,878 | 126,867,282 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.46 | $ | 0.96 | $ | 1.02 | $ | 1.54 | ||||||||
The following table summarizes the share equivalent of potentially dilutive securities
that have been excluded from the denominator used in the calculation of diluted earnings per share
due to their antidilutive effect:
Fiscal Quarters Ended | Fiscal Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Share issuable under outstanding options not
included in the computation of diluted earnings
per share because the assumed proceeds were
greater than the average share price for the period |
1,551,052 | 2,448,119 | 1,551,052 | 3,008,199 | ||||||||||||
Share-Based Compensation Plans We estimate the fair value of each option award on the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. We then recognize the grant date
fair value of each option as compensation expense ratably using the straight-line attribution
method over the service period (generally the vesting period). The Black-Scholes model
incorporates the following assumptions:
| Expected volatility we estimate the volatility of our share price at the date of grant using historical volatility adjusted for periods of unusual stock price activity. |
| Expected term we estimate the expected term using the simplified method, as outlined in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based Payment. |
12
Table of Contents
| Risk-free interest rate we estimate the risk-free interest rate using the U.S. Treasury yield curve for periods equal to the expected term of the options in effect at the time of grant. |
| Dividends we use an expected dividend yield of zero because we have not declared or paid a cash dividend since July 2001 and we do not have any plans to declare or pay any cash dividends. |
We used the following weighted-average assumptions to estimate the fair value of the options
granted for the periods indicated:
Fiscal Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Expected volatility |
69.18 | % | 69.31 | % | ||||
Expected term |
3.78 years | 3.28 years | ||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
1.72 | % | 1.45 | % | ||||
Expected dividend yield |
0 | % | 0 | % |
We estimate the fair value of restricted awards using the market price of our shares on
the date of grant. We then recognize the fair value of each restricted award as compensation cost
ratably using the straight-line attribution method over the service period (generally the vesting
period).
We estimate pre-vesting forfeitures at the time of grant using a combination of historical
data and demographic characteristics, and we revise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual
forfeitures differ from those estimates. We record share-based compensation expense only for those
awards that are expected to vest.
Recent Accounting Developments In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update
(ASU) No. 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the
Allowance for Credit Losses. This ASU requires specific disclosures related to the credit quality
of an entitys financing receivables and its allowance for credit losses. Financing receivable is
defined in the ASU as a contractual right to receive money on demand or on fixed or determinable
dates that is recognized as an asset in the entitys statement of financial position. New
disclosures are required for finance receivables and the related allowance for credit losses on a
disaggregated basis, which the standard defines as portfolio segment and class of financing
receivable. ASU No. 2010-20 is effective for financial statements issued for interim or annual
periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. We will amend our disclosures accordingly beginning
with our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal
year 2010.
2. Business Combinations
In October 2009, we acquired substantially all of the assets of the Houston operations of
Atlas Engineering, Inc., a privately held company, for a purchase price of approximately $21,000.
The purchase price may be increased by an estimated $12,000 for contingent consideration depending
on the acquired companys EBITDA, as defined in the purchase agreement for this transaction, over
the first three years after the closing date. The estimated fair value of the contingent
consideration liability on our consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2010 was $6,932. The
acquired company is active in upstream oil and gas engineering services. The purchase price
allocation and pro forma information for this acquisition were not material to our consolidated
financial statements. This companys financial results are included within our Global E&C Group
business segment.
In April 2009, we acquired substantially all of the assets of the offshore engineering
division of OPE Holdings Ltd., a Canadian company that is listed on the TSX Venture Exchange and
which we refer to as OPE, for a purchase price of approximately $8,900. The acquired company is
active in upstream oil and gas engineering services. The purchase price allocation and pro forma
information for this acquisition were not material to our consolidated financial statements. This
companys financial results are included within our Global E&C Group business segment.
13
Table of Contents
3. Investments
Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates
We own a noncontrolling interest in two electric power generation projects, one
waste-to-energy project and one wind farm project in Italy and in a refinery/electric power
generation project in Chile. We also own a noncontrolling interest in a project based in Italy
which generates earnings from royalty payments linked to the price of natural gas. Based on the
outstanding equity interests of these entities, we own 42% of each of the two electric power
generation projects in Italy, 39% of the waste-to-energy project and 50% of the wind farm project.
We have a notional 85% equity interest in the project in Chile; however, we are not the primary
beneficiary as a result of participating rights held by the minority shareholder. In determining
that we are not the primary beneficiary, we considered the minority shareholders right to approve
activities of the project that most significantly impact the projects economic performance which
include the right to approve or reject the annual financial (capital and operating) budget and the
annual operating plan, the right to approve or reject the appointment of the general manager and
senior management, and approval rights with respect to capital expenditures beyond those included
in the annual budget.
On February 27, 2010, an earthquake occurred off the coast of Chile that caused significant
damage to our unconsolidated affiliates Chile based project. The projects facility suspended
normal operating activities from that date. We do not yet have a complete assessment of the extent
of the damage or an estimate of the required cost of repairs. However, we believe the property
damage insurance coverage in effect will be sufficient to cover the estimated costs of repairing
the facility and to substantially compensate the project for the loss of profits while the facility
has suspended operations until such time as normal operating activities can resume.
14
Table of Contents
We account for these investments in Italy and Chile under the equity method. The following is
summarized financial information for these entities (each as a whole) in which we have an equity
interest:
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Italy Based Projects | Chile Based Project | Italy Based Projects | Chile Based Project | |||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: |
||||||||||||||||
Current assets |
$ | 234,895 | $ | 26,083 | $ | 325,688 | $ | 46,311 | ||||||||
Other assets (primarily buildings and equipment) |
545,414 | 122,586 | 644,344 | 127,393 | ||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
111,486 | 23,112 | 173,593 | 40,444 | ||||||||||||
Other liabilities (primarily long-term debt) |
360,558 | 56,214 | 440,942 | 63,109 | ||||||||||||
Net assets |
308,265 | 69,343 | 355,497 | 70,151 |
Fiscal Quarters Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Italy Based Projects | Chile Based Project | Italy Based Projects | Chile Based Project | |||||||||||||
Income Statement Data: |
||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 98,635 | $ | 6,681 | $ | 95,084 | $ | 15,534 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
21,602 | (1,198 | ) | 26,095 | 9,486 | |||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
17,169 | 223 | 22,616 | 8,053 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings |
10,037 | 185 | 15,833 | 6,684 |
Fiscal Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Italy Based Projects | Chile Based Project | Italy Based Projects | Chile Based Project | |||||||||||||
Income Statement Data: |
||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 198,273 | $ | 17,304 | $ | 199,158 | $ | 33,346 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
40,579 | 3,289 | 39,249 | 19,900 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
31,072 | 4,394 | 32,599 | 16,369 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings |
17,949 | 3,647 | 21,054 | 13,586 |
The summarized financial information presented above for the Chile based project includes
an estimated recovery under a property damage insurance policy sufficient to repair the facility
and an estimated recovery under a business interruption insurance policy for fixed costs until the
facility becomes fully operational. In accordance with authoritative accounting guidance on
business interruption insurance, estimated recovery for lost profits cannot be assumed until
substantially all contingencies related to the insurance claim are resolved. A claim for lost
profits has recently been submitted to the insurance carrier of the project and we expect that the
project will be able to record an estimate for lost profits as the claim is finalized.
Therefore, we have not recorded equity earnings in the Chile based project since the earthquake, as
the operational costs incurred by the project are offset by the same estimated recovery under the
property damage and business interruption insurance policies.
Our equity in the net earnings of the unconsolidated affiliates in the table above totaled
$4,293 and $10,582 for the fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010 and $10,639 and
$16,891 for the fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. Equity in the
net earnings of the unconsolidated affiliates is recorded within other income, net on the
consolidated statement of operations.
Our investment in these unconsolidated affiliates, which is recorded within investments in and
advances to unconsolidated affiliates on the consolidated balance sheet, totaled $187,596 and
$215,280 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Distributions of $14,198 and
$20,686 were received during the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009,
respectively.
15
Table of Contents
We have guaranteed certain performance obligations of the Chile based project. We do not
expect that the earthquake will require us to contribute to this project under our performance
obligations.
We have a contingent obligation, which is measured annually based on the operating results of
the Chile based project for the preceding year and is shared equally with our minority interest
partner. We did not have a current payment obligation under this guarantee as of December 31,
2009.
In addition, we have provided a $10,000 debt service reserve letter of credit to cover debt
service payments in the event that the Chile based project does not generate sufficient cash flows
to make such payments. We are required to maintain the debt service reserve letter of credit
during the term of the Chile based projects debt, which matures in 2014. As of June 30, 2010, no
amounts have been drawn under this letter of credit and, based on our current assessment of the
situation following the earthquake in Chile (described above) we do not anticipate any amounts
being drawn under this letter of credit.
We
also have a wholly-owned subsidiary that provides operations and maintenance services to
the Chile based project. Our fees for the services provided under our operations and maintenance
agreement to the Chile based project were $2,459 and $4,920 for the fiscal quarter and six months
ended June 30, 2010. We continue to provide our services to the project, which since the earthquake
in Chile noted above, have been focused on assessing the damage caused by the earthquake and the
related repair for the facility to resume normal operating activities. Our fees for the services
provided under our operations and maintenance agreement to the Chile based project for the fiscal
quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009 were $2,096 and $4,232, respectively. We record the fees
for operations and maintenance services in operating revenues on our consolidated statement of
operations. We had a receivable from our unconsolidated affiliate in Chile of $1,735 and $4,916
recorded in trade accounts and notes receivable on our consolidated balance sheet as of June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
We also have guaranteed the performance obligations of our wholly-owned subsidiary under the
Chile based projects operations and maintenance agreement. The guarantee is limited to $20,000
over the life of the operations and maintenance agreement, which extends through 2016. No amounts
have ever been paid under the guarantee.
Other Investments
We are the majority equity partner and general partner of a gas-fired cogeneration facility in
Martinez, California, and we own 100% of the equity in a waste-to-energy facility in Camden, New
Jersey. We have determined that these entities are VIEs and that we are the primary beneficiary of
these VIEs since we have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the
VIEs performance. These activities include the operations and maintenance of the facility.
Accordingly, we consolidate these entities. The aggregate net assets of these entities are
presented below.
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Balance Sheet Data: |
||||||||
Current assets |
$ | 13,324 | $ | 14,722 | ||||
Other assets (primarily buildings and equipment) |
101,576 | 104,552 | ||||||
Current liabilities |
30,220 | 31,014 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
786 | 876 | ||||||
Net assets |
83,894 | 87,384 |
Please see Note 12 for further information on the waste-to-energy facility.
16
Table of Contents
4. Intangible Assets
We have tracked accumulated goodwill impairments since December 29, 2001, the first day of
fiscal year 2002 and our date of adoption of the accounting guidelines within FASB ASC 350-20.
There were no accumulated goodwill impairment losses as of that date. The net carrying amount of
goodwill by geographic region for our reporting units in our Global E&C Group and Global Power
Group was as follows:
Global E&C Group | Global Power Group | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | December 31, | June 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
U.S. |
$ | 36,657 | $ | 35,436 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Asia |
1,014 | 1,012 | | | ||||||||||||
Europe |
| | 44,549 | 52,254 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 37,671 | $ | 36,448 | $ | 44,549 | $ | 52,254 | ||||||||
In February 2010, we made a $1,200 contractual payment related to a prior acquisition of
a business that is reflected in our Global E&C Groups U.S. operations.
The following table details amounts relating to our identifiable intangible assets:
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Net | Gross | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | |||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Amount | Amount | Amortization | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
Patents |
$ | 38,611 | $ | (25,953 | ) | $ | 12,658 | $ | 39,304 | $ | (24,983 | ) | $ | 14,321 | ||||||||||
Trademarks |
62,618 | (25,463 | ) | 37,155 | 63,676 | (24,487 | ) | 39,189 | ||||||||||||||||
Customer
relationships,
pipeline and
backlog |
21,938 | (3,806 | ) | 18,132 | 21,934 | (2,415 | ) | 19,519 | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 123,167 | $ | (55,222 | ) | $ | 67,945 | $ | 124,914 | $ | (51,885 | ) | $ | 73,029 | ||||||||||
As of June 30, 2010, the net carrying amounts of our identifiable intangible assets were
$49,641 for our Global Power Group and $18,304 for our Global E&C Group.
Amortization expense related to identifiable intangible assets is recorded within cost of
operating revenues on the consolidated statement of operations and totaled $1,559 and $3,337 for
the fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010,
respectively, and $1,285 and $2,514 for the
fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The following table shows the
approximate full year amortization expense in each of the fiscal years 2010 through 2014.
Approximate | ||||
Amortization | ||||
Fiscal Years: | Expense | |||
2010 |
$ | 6,700 | ||
2011 |
6,500 | |||
2012 |
6,300 | |||
2013 |
5,600 | |||
2014 |
5,300 |
17
Table of Contents
5. Long-term Debt
The following table shows the components of our long-term debt:
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Current | Long-term | Total | Current | Long-term | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Capital Lease Obligations |
$ | 1,753 | $ | 59,244 | $ | 60,997 | $ | 1,492 | $ | 65,327 | $ | 66,819 | ||||||||||||
Special-Purpose Limited Recourse Project Debt: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Camden County Energy Recovery Associates |
21,865 | | 21,865 | 21,865 | | 21,865 | ||||||||||||||||||
FW Power S.r.l. |
6,548 | 78,124 | 84,672 | 7,428 | 95,661 | 103,089 | ||||||||||||||||||
Energia Holdings, LLC |
2,019 | 11,220 | 13,239 | 3,187 | 13,239 | 16,426 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated Robbins Facility Exit Funding Obligations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999C Bonds at 7.25% interest, due October 15, 2024 |
| 1,283 | 1,283 | | 1,283 | 1,283 | ||||||||||||||||||
Term Loan in China at 4.78% interest, due February 25, 2011 |
2,212 | | 2,212 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Term Loan in China at 4.374% interest, due January 8, 2010 |
| | | 2,930 | | 2,930 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| | | 28 | | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 34,397 | $ | 149,871 | $ | 184,268 | $ | 36,930 | $ | 175,510 | $ | 212,440 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Senior Secured Credit Agreement On July 30, 2010, Foster Wheeler AG, Foster
Wheeler Ltd., certain of Foster Wheeler Ltd.s subsidiaries and BNP Paribas, as Administrative
Agent, entered into a four-year amendment and restatement of our U.S. senior secured credit
agreement, which we entered into in October 2006. The amended and restated U.S. senior secured
credit agreement provides for a facility of $450,000, and includes a provision which permits future
incremental increases of up to $225,000 in total availability under the facility. The amended and
restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement permits us to issue up to $450,000 under the letter
of credit facility. Letters of credit issued under the amended and restated U.S. senior secured
credit agreement have performance pricing that is decreased (or increased) as a result of
improvements (or reductions) in our corporate credit rating as reported by Moodys Investors
Service (Moodys) and/or Standard & Poors (S&P). Based on the current ratings, the letter of
credit fees for performance and financial letters of credit issued under the amended and restated
U.S. senior secured credit agreement are 1.125% and 2.25% per annum of the outstanding amount,
respectively, excluding a nominal fronting fee. We also have the option to use up to $100,000 of
the $450,000 for revolving borrowings at a rate equal to adjusted LIBOR, as defined in the
agreement, plus 2.25%, subject also to the performance pricing noted above.
Unamortized fees and expenses in conjunction with the execution of our amended and restated
U.S. senior credit agreement were approximately $4,300 and will be amortized to expense over the
four-year term of the agreement, commencing in the third fiscal quarter of 2010. As a result of
amending and restating our October 2006 U.S. senior secured credit agreement in July 2010 we
incurred an impairment charge in the third fiscal quarter of 2010 of $1,600 related to unamortized
fees and expenses paid in conjunction with the October 2006 agreement.
The assets and/or stock of certain of our U.S. and non-U.S. subsidiaries collateralize our
obligations under our amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement. Our amended and
restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement contains various customary restrictive covenants that
generally limit our ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness or guarantees,
create liens or other encumbrances on property, sell or transfer certain property and thereafter
rent or lease such property for substantially the same purposes as the property sold or
transferred, enter into a merger or similar transaction, make investments, declare dividends or
make other restricted payments, enter into agreements with affiliates that are not on an arms
length basis, enter into any agreement that limits our ability to create liens or the ability of a
subsidiary to pay dividends, engage in new lines of business, with respect to Foster Wheeler AG,
change Foster Wheeler AGs fiscal year or, with respect to Foster Wheeler AG, Foster Wheeler Ltd.
and one of our holding company subsidiaries, directly acquire ownership of the operating assets
used to conduct any business. In the event that our corporate credit rating as issued by Moodys
is at least Baa3 and as issued by S&P is at least BBB-, all liens securing our obligations under
the amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement will be automatically released and
terminated.
In addition, our amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement contains financial
covenants requiring us not to exceed a total leverage ratio, which compares total indebtedness to
EBITDA, and to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio, which compares EBITDA to interest
expense. All such terms are defined in our amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit
agreement. We must be in compliance with the total leverage ratio at all times, while the interest
coverage ratio is measured quarterly. We have been in compliance with all financial covenants and
other provisions of our U.S. senior secured credit agreement prior and subsequent to our amendment
and restatement of the agreement.
18
Table of Contents
We had approximately $284,700 and $308,000 of letters of credit outstanding under our U.S.
senior secured credit agreement in effect as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
The letter of credit fees under the U.S. senior secured credit agreement in effect as of June 30,
2010 ranged from 1.50% to 1.60% of the outstanding amount, excluding a nominal fronting fee. There
were no funded borrowings under this agreement as of June 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009.
During the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2010, one of our subsidiaries based in China
repaid its outstanding term loan at the scheduled maturity date. Also during the fiscal six months
ended June 30, 2010, the same China based subsidiary entered into a new term loan for 15 million
Chinese Yuan (approximately $2,197 at the exchange rate in effect at the inception of the term
loan) with an interest rate of 4.78% and maturity date of February 25, 2011.
The estimated fair values of our long-term debt were $196,198 and $222,165 as of June 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively. We estimate the fair value of our long-term debt (including
current installments) based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the
current rates offered for debt of the same remaining maturities.
6. Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits
We have defined benefit pension plans in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Canada
and Finland, and we have other postretirement benefit plans for health care and life insurance
benefits in the United States and Canada.
Defined
Benefit Pension Plans Our defined benefit pension plans cover certain
full-time employees. Under the plans, retirement benefits are primarily a function of both years
of service and level of compensation.
The U.S. pension plans, which are frozen to new entrants and additional benefit accruals, and
the Canadian, Finnish and French plans are non-contributory. The U.K. pension plan, which is
closed to new entrants and additional benefit accruals, is contributory.
During the fiscal first six months of 2010, we capped pensionable salary growth in the U.K.
plan to a maximum of 5% and, effective March 31, 2010, we closed the plan for future defined
benefit accrual. As a result of the U.K. plan closure, we recognized a curtailment gain in our
statement of operations for the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2010 of approximately £13,300
(approximately $20,086 at the exchange rate in effect at the time of the plan closure).
Based on the minimum statutory funding requirements for fiscal year 2010, we are not required
to make any mandatory contributions to our U.S. pension plans. We made mandatory and discretionary
contributions totaling approximately $29,200 to our U.S. and non-U.S. pension plans, which included
discretionary contributions totaling approximately $17,800 to our U.S. and U.K. pension plans,
during the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2010. Based on the minimum statutory funding
requirements for fiscal year 2010, we expect to make mandatory and discretionary contributions
totaling approximately $39,000 to our U.S. and non-U.S. pension plans in fiscal year 2010.
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans Certain employees in the United States and Canada may become
eligible for health care and life insurance benefits (other postretirement benefits) if they
qualify for and commence normal or early retirement pension benefits as defined in the U.S. and
Canadian pension plans while working for us. Additionally, one of our subsidiaries in the United
States also has a benefit plan, referred to as the Survivor Income Plan (SIP), which provides
coverage for an employees beneficiary upon the death of the employee. This plan has been closed
to new entrants since 1988.
19
Table of Contents
The components of net periodic benefit cost/(credit) for our defined benefit pension plans and
other postretirement benefit plans were as follows:
Fiscal Quarter Ended June 30, 2010 | Fiscal Quarter Ended June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defined Benefit Pension Plans | Postre- | Defined Benefit Pension Plans | Postre- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United | United | tirement | United | United | tirement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
States | Kingdom | Other | Total | Benefits | States | Kingdom | Other | Total | Benefits | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost/(credit): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | | $ | 174 | $ | 154 | $ | 328 | $ | 21 | $ | | $ | 1,350 | $ | 158 | $ | 1,508 | $ | 32 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest cost |
4,730 | 9,895 | 394 | 15,019 | 619 | 4,972 | 10,199 | 445 | 15,616 | 1,283 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected return
on plan assets |
(5,245 | ) | (9,804 | ) | (340 | ) | (15,389 | ) | | (4,291 | ) | (8,299 | ) | (291 | ) | (12,881 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of transition
(asset)/obligation |
| | 24 | 24 | (8 | ) | | (12 | ) | 21 | 9 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of
prior service cost/(credit) |
| 4 | 5 | 9 | (989 | ) | | 1,924 | 4 | 1,928 | (1,156 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of
net actuarial loss/(gain) |
1,748 | 1,446 | 142 | 3,336 | (23 | ) | 2,041 | 3,346 | 124 | 5,511 | 178 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Curtailment gain)/
settlement charges* |
| | 422 | 422 | | | | 191 | 191 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total net periodic
benefit cost/(credit) |
$ | 1,233 | $ | 1,715 | $ | 801 | $ | 3,749 | $ | (380 | ) | $ | 2,722 | $ | 8,508 | $ | 652 | $ | 11,882 | $ | 337 | |||||||||||||||||||
Changes recognized in
comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial loss |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Prior service credit |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of transition
asset/(obligation) |
| | (24 | ) | (24 | ) | 8 | | 12 | (21 | ) | (9 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of
prior service (cost)/credit |
| (4 | ) | (5 | ) | (9 | ) | 989 | | (1,924 | ) | (4 | ) | (1,928 | ) | 1,156 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of
net actuarial (loss)/gain |
(1,748 | ) | (1,446 | ) | (142 | ) | (3,336 | ) | 23 | (2,041 | ) | (3,346 | ) | (124 | ) | (5,511 | ) | (178 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total recognized
in comprehensive
income |
$ | (1,748 | ) | $ | (1,450 | ) | $ | (171 | ) | $ | (3,369 | ) | $ | 1,020 | $ | (2,041 | ) | $ | (5,258 | ) | $ | (149 | ) | $ | (7,448 | ) | $ | 978 | ||||||||||||
Fiscal Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | Fiscal Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defined Benefit Pension Plans | Postre- | Defined Benefit Pension Plans | Postre- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United | United | tirement | United | United | tirement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
States | Kingdom | Other | Total | Benefits | States | Kingdom | Other | Total | Benefits | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost/(credit): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | | $ | 1,886 | $ | 319 | $ | 2,205 | $ | 55 | $ | | $ | 2,608 | $ | 310 | $ | 2,918 | $ | 67 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest cost |
9,474 | 20,125 | 795 | 30,394 | 1,826 | 9,898 | 19,740 | 869 | 30,507 | 2,437 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected return
on plan assets |
(10,257 | ) | (19,637 | ) | (675 | ) | (30,569 | ) | | (8,559 | ) | (16,059 | ) | (566 | ) | (25,184 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of transition
(asset)/obligation |
| | 48 | 48 | (8 | ) | | (23 | ) | 41 | 18 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of
prior service cost/(credit) |
| (426 | ) | 10 | (416 | ) | (1,985 | ) | | 3,726 | 8 | 3,734 | (2,313 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of
net actuarial loss |
3,483 | 5,501 | 280 | 9,264 | 29 | 3,918 | 6,403 | 239 | 10,560 | 423 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Curtailment gain)/
settlement charges* |
| (20,086 | ) | 422 | (19,664 | ) | | | | 191 | 191 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total net periodic
benefit cost/(credit) |
$ | 2,700 | $ | (12,637 | ) | $ | 1,199 | $ | (8,738 | ) | $ | (83 | ) | $ | 5,257 | $ | 16,395 | $ | 1,092 | $ | 22,744 | $ | 614 | |||||||||||||||||
Changes recognized in
comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial loss |
$ | | $ | 21,130 | $ | | $ | 21,130 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Prior service credit |
| (9,054 | ) | | (9,054 | ) | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of transition
asset/(obligation) |
| | (48 | ) | (48 | ) | 8 | | 23 | (41 | ) | (18 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of
prior service (cost)/credit |
| 426 | (10 | ) | 416 | 1,985 | | (3,726 | ) | (8 | ) | (3,734 | ) | 2,313 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of
net actuarial loss |
(3,483 | ) | (5,501 | ) | (280 | ) | (9,264 | ) | (29 | ) | (3,918 | ) | (6,403 | ) | (239 | ) | (10,560 | ) | (423 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total recognized
in comprehensive
income |
$ | (3,483 | ) | $ | 7,001 | $ | (338 | ) | $ | 3,180 | $ | 1,964 | $ | (3,918 | ) | $ | (10,106 | ) | $ | (288 | ) | $ | (14,312 | ) | $ | 1,890 | ||||||||||||||
* | During the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2010, a curtailment gain resulted from the closure of the U.K. pension plan for future benefit accrual. During the fiscal quarters and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, charges were incurred related to the settlement of pension obligations with former employees of the Canada pension plan. |
20
Table of Contents
7. Guarantees and Warranties
We have agreed to indemnify certain third parties relating to businesses and/or assets that we
previously owned and sold to such third parties. Such indemnifications relate primarily to
potential environmental and tax exposures for activities conducted by us prior to the sale of such
businesses and/or assets. It is not possible to predict the maximum potential amount of future
payments under these or similar indemnifications due to the conditional nature of the obligations
and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular indemnification.
Maximum | Carrying Amount of Liability | |||||||||
Potential | June 30, | December 31, | ||||||||
Payment | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||
Environmental indemnifications |
No limit | $ | 8,900 | $ | 8,800 | |||||
Tax indemnifications |
No limit | $ | | $ | |
We also maintain contingencies for warranty expenses on certain of our long-term
contracts. Generally, warranty contingencies are accrued over the life of the contract so that a
sufficient balance is maintained to cover our aggregate exposure at the conclusion of the project.
Fiscal Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||
Warranty Liability: | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 110,800 | $ | 99,400 | ||||
Accruals |
11,000 | 14,900 | ||||||
Settlements |
(8,400 | ) | (1,300 | ) | ||||
Adjustments to provisions, including foreign currency translation |
(19,200 | ) | (5,100 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 94,200 | $ | 107,900 | ||||
We are contingently liable under standby letters of credit, bank guarantees and surety
bonds, totaling $913,800 and $943,100 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively,
primarily for performance guarantees. These balances include the standby letters of credit issued
under the U.S. senior credit agreement discussed in Note 5 and from other facilities worldwide. No
material claims have been made against these guarantees, and based on our experience and current
expectations, we do not anticipate any material claims.
We have also guaranteed certain performance obligations in a refinery/electric power
generation project based in Chile in which we hold a noncontrolling interest. See Note 3 for
further information.
8. Derivative Financial Instruments
We are exposed to certain risks relating to our ongoing business operations. The risks
managed by using derivative financial instruments relate primarily to foreign currency exchange
rate risk and, to a significantly lesser extent, interest rate risk. Derivative financial
instruments are recognized as assets or liabilities at fair value in our consolidated balance
sheet.
Fair Values of Derivative Financial Instruments | ||||||||||||||||||||
Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | |||||||||||||||||||
Location within | Location within | |||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | June 30, | December 31, | Consolidated | June 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet | 2010 | 2009 | Balance Sheet | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap contracts
|
Other assets | $ | | $ | | Other long-term liabilities | $ | 8,359 | $ | 6,554 | ||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
Contracts in process or billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts | 1,632 | 1,174 | Contracts in process or billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts | 4,838 | 4,934 | ||||||||||||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
Other accounts receivable |
22 | 470 | Accounts payable | 138 | 246 | ||||||||||||||
Total derivatives
|
$ | 1,654 | $ | 1,644 | $ | 13,335 | $ | 11,734 | ||||||||||||
21
Table of Contents
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We operate on a worldwide basis with substantial operations in Europe that subject us to U.S.
dollar translation risk mainly relative to the Euro and British pound. Under our risk management
policies we do not hedge translation risk exposure. All activities of our non-U.S. affiliates are
recorded in their functional currency, which is typically the local currency in the country of
domicile of the affiliate. In the ordinary course of business, our affiliates do enter into
transactions in currencies other than their respective functional currencies. We seek to minimize
the resulting foreign currency transaction risk by contracting for the procurement of goods and
services in the same currency as the sales value of the related long-term contract. We further
mitigate the risk through the use of foreign currency forward contracts.
Currency | Hedged Foreign | Notional Amount of | Notional Amount of | |||||||||||
Hedged | Currency Exposure | Forward Buy Contracts | Forward Sell Contracts | |||||||||||
Functional | (bought or sold | (in equivalent | (in equivalent | (in equivalent | ||||||||||
Currency | forward) | U.S. dollars) | U.S. dollars) | U.S. dollars) | ||||||||||
British pound |
Euro | $ | 3,744 | $ | 1,720 | $ | 2,024 | |||||||
Australian dollar | 6,482 | 1,793 | 4,689 | |||||||||||
U.S. dollar | 63,504 | 3,070 | 60,434 | |||||||||||
South African rand | 1,256 | | 1,256 | |||||||||||
Chilean peso |
Euro | 129 | | 129 | ||||||||||
Chinese yuan |
Euro | 3,337 | | 3,337 | ||||||||||
U.S. dollar | 21,342 | 10,460 | 10,882 | |||||||||||
Euro |
U.S. dollar | 23,392 | 1,672 | 21,720 | ||||||||||
Polish zloty |
Euro | 22,897 | | 22,897 | ||||||||||
South African rand |
British pound | 8,526 | 8,526 | | ||||||||||
Singapore dollar | 10,201 | 10,201 | | |||||||||||
U.S. dollar |
Canadian dollar | 295 | 295 | | ||||||||||
Euro | 273 | 273 | | |||||||||||
British pound | 200 | 200 | | |||||||||||
Singapore dollar | 46 | 46 | | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 165,624 | $ | 38,256 | $ | 127,368 | ||||||||
The notional amount provides one measure of the transaction volume outstanding as of the
balance sheet date. Amounts ultimately realized upon final settlement of these financial
instruments, along with the gains and losses on the underlying exposures within our long-term
contracts, will depend on actual market exchange rates during the remaining life of the
instruments. The contracts mature between fiscal years 2010 and 2013.
We are exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparties. These
counterparties are commercial banks that are primarily rated BBB+ or better by Standard & Poors
(or the equivalent by other recognized credit rating agencies).
22
Table of Contents
Increases in the fair value of the currencies sold forward result in losses while increases in
the fair value of the currencies bought forward result in gains. The gain or loss from the portion
of the mark-to-market adjustment related to the completed portion of the underlying contract is
included in cost of operating revenues at the same time as the underlying foreign currency exposure
occurs. The gain or loss from the remaining portion of the mark-to-market adjustment, specifically
the portion relating to the uncompleted portion of the underlying contract is reflected directly in
cost of operating revenues in the period in which the mark-to-market adjustment occurs. The
incremental gain or loss from the remaining uncompleted portion of our contracts was as follows:
Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives | ||||||||||||||||||||
Location of Gain/(Loss) | Fiscal Quarters Ended | Fiscal Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives Not Designated as | Recognized in Income on | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
Hedging Instruments | Derivative | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
Cost of operating revenues | $ | (556 | ) | $ | 3,119 | $ | (2,007 | ) | $ | 5,338 | |||||||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
Other deductions, net | (187 | ) | (95 | ) | (375 | ) | 277 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | (743 | ) | $ | 3,024 | $ | (2,382 | ) | $ | 5,615 | ||||||||||
The mark-to-market adjustments on foreign currency forward exchange contracts for these
unrealized gains or losses are primarily recorded in either contracts in process or billings in
excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts on the consolidated balance sheet.
During the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we included net cash outflows on
the settlement of derivatives of $5,804 and $7,690, respectively, within the net change in
contracts in process and billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted
contracts, a component of cash flows from operating activities in the consolidated statement of
cash flows.
Interest Rate Risk
We use interest rate swap contracts to manage interest rate risk associated with some of our
variable rate special-purpose limited recourse project debt. The aggregate notional amount of the
receive-variable/pay-fixed interest rate swaps was $70,400 as of June 30, 2010.
Upon entering into the swap contracts, we designate the interest rate swaps as cash flow
hedges. We assess at inception, and on an ongoing basis, whether the interest rate swaps are
highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the project debt. Consequently, we
record the fair value of interest rate swap contracts in our consolidated balance sheet at each
balance sheet date. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap contracts are recorded as
a component of other comprehensive income.
Location of | ||||||||||||
Gain/(Loss) | ||||||||||||
Reclassified from | ||||||||||||
Accumulated | Amount of Gain/(Loss) | |||||||||||
Amount of Gain/(Loss) | Other | Reclassified from | ||||||||||
Recognized in Other | Comprehensive | Accumulated Other | ||||||||||
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships | Comprehensive Income | Loss | Comprehensive Loss | |||||||||
Fiscal Quarter Ended June 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||
Interest rate swap contracts |
$ | 9 | Interest expense | $ | | |||||||
Fiscal Quarter Ended June 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||
Interest rate swap contracts |
$ | 1,122 | Interest expense | $ | | |||||||
Fiscal Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||
Interest rate swap contracts |
$ | (1,805 | ) | Interest expense | $ | | ||||||
Fiscal Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||
Interest rate swap contracts |
$ | (711 | ) | Interest expense | $ | |
23
Table of Contents
9. Share-Based Compensation Plans
Our share-based compensation plans include both restricted awards and stock option awards.
Compensation cost for our share-based plans of $4,972 and $9,574 was charged against income for the
fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $5,501 and $10,855 for the
fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The related income tax benefit
recognized in the consolidated statement of operations was $70 and $169 for the fiscal quarter and
six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $110 and $220 for the fiscal quarter and six
months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. We received $594 and $2,628 in cash from stock option
exercises under our share-based compensation plans for the fiscal quarter and six months ended June
30, 2010. There were no option exercises under our share-based compensation plans during the
fiscal six months ended June 30, 2009.
As of June 30, 2010, we had $18,182 and $20,585 of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to stock options and restricted awards, respectively. Those costs are expected to be
recognized as expense over a weighted-average period of approximately 26 months.
Our share-based compensation plans include a change in control provision, which provides for
cash redemption of equity awards issued thereunder in certain limited circumstances. In accordance
with Securities and Exchange Commission Accounting Series Release No. 268, Presentation in
Financial Statements of Redeemable Preferred Stocks, we present the redemption amount of these
equity awards as temporary equity on the consolidated balance sheet as the equity award is
amortized during the vesting period. The redemption amount represents the intrinsic value of the
equity award on the grant date. In accordance with FASB ASC 480-10-S99-3A (formerly EITF Topic
D-98, Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities), we do not adjust the redemption
amount each reporting period unless and until it becomes probable that the equity awards will
become redeemable (upon a change in control event). Upon vesting of the equity awards, we
reclassify the intrinsic value of the equity awards, as determined on the grant date, to permanent
equity. A reconciliation of temporary equity for the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009 were as follows:
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 2,570 | $ | 7,586 | ||||
Compensation
cost during the period for those equity awards with intrinsic value on the grant date |
4,806 | 5,576 | ||||||
Intrinsic
value of equity awards vested during the period for those equity awards with intrinsic value on the grant date |
(37 | ) | (4,572 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 7,339 | $ | 8,590 | ||||
Our articles of association provide for conditional capital of 63,207,957 registered
shares for the issuance of shares under our share-based compensation plans, outstanding share
purchase warrants and other convertible securities we may issue in the future. Conditional capital
decreases upon issuance of shares in connection with the exercise of outstanding stock options or
vesting of restricted stock units, with an offsetting increase to our issued share capital. As of
June 30, 2010, our remaining available conditional capital was 62,101,932 shares.
10. Income Taxes
The tax provision for each year-to-date period is calculated by multiplying pretax income by
the estimated annual effective tax rate for such period. Our effective tax rate can fluctuate
significantly from period to period and may differ significantly from the U.S. federal statutory
rate as a result of income taxed in various non-U.S. jurisdictions with rates different from the
U.S. statutory rate, as a result of our inability to recognize a tax benefit for losses generated
by certain unprofitable operations and as a result of the varying mix of income earned in the
jurisdictions in which we operate. We have reduced our U.S. and certain non-U.S. tax benefits by a
valuation allowance based on a consideration of all available evidence, which indicates that it is
more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In periods
when operating units subject to a valuation allowance generate pretax earnings, the corresponding
reduction in the valuation allowance favorably impacts our effective tax rate. Conversely, in
periods when operating units subject to a valuation allowance generate pretax losses, the
corresponding increase in the valuation allowance has an unfavorable impact on our effective tax
rate.
24
Table of Contents
Fiscal Year 2010
Our effective tax rate for the fiscal first six months of 2010 was lower than the U.S.
statutory rate of 35% due principally to the net impact of the following:
| Income earned in tax jurisdictions with tax rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate, which is expected to contribute to an approximate 18-percentage point reduction in the effective tax rate for the full year 2010. | ||
| A valuation allowance increase because we are unable to recognize a tax benefit for losses subject to valuation allowance in certain jurisdictions (primarily the United States), which is expected to contribute an approximate five-percentage point increase in the effective tax rate for the full year 2010. |
Fiscal Year 2009
Our effective tax rate for the fiscal first six months of 2009 was lower than the U.S.
statutory rate of 35% due principally to the impact of the following:
| Income earned in tax jurisdictions with tax rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate, which contributed to an approximate 18-percentage point reduction in the effective tax rate. | ||
| A valuation allowance increase because we were unable to recognize a tax benefit for losses subject to valuation allowance in certain jurisdictions (primarily the United States), which contributed to an approximate three-percentage point increase in the effective tax rate. |
These variances were partially offset by the reduction of valuation allowances in certain
jurisdictions and other permanent differences.
We evaluate, on a quarterly basis, the need for the valuation allowances against deferred tax
assets in those jurisdictions in which we currently maintain a valuation allowance. Such
evaluation includes a review of all available evidence, both positive and negative, in determining
whether a valuation allowance is necessary.
Our subsidiaries file income tax returns in numerous tax jurisdictions, including the United
States, several U.S. states and numerous non-U.S. jurisdictions around the world. Tax returns are
also filed in jurisdictions where our subsidiaries execute project-related work. The statute of
limitations varies by jurisdiction. Because of the number of jurisdictions in which we file tax
returns, in any given year the statute of limitations in a number of jurisdictions may expire
within 12 months from the balance sheet date. As a result, we expect recurring changes in
unrecognized tax benefits due to the expiration of the statute of limitations, none of which are
expected to be individually significant. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S.
(including federal, state and local) or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for
years before fiscal year 2005.
A number of tax years are under audit by the relevant state and non-U.S. tax authorities. We
anticipate that several of these audits may be concluded in the foreseeable future, including in
fiscal year 2010. Based on the status of these audits, it is reasonably possible that the
conclusion of the audits may result in a reduction of unrecognized tax benefits. However, it is
not possible to estimate the magnitude of any such reduction at this time.
We recognize interest accrued on the unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and
penalties on the unrecognized tax benefits in other deductions, net on our consolidated statement
of operations. During the fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded net
interest expense of $292 and $1,234, respectively, which were net of previously accrued interest
expense that were ultimately not assessed of $1,126 and $1,130, respectively. During the fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 2010, there was no net change in penalties on unrecognized tax benefits;
however, during the six months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded a net reduction of penalties on
unrecognized tax benefits of $101, which was net of previously accrued tax penalties that were
ultimately not assessed of $1,382. During the fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009,
we recorded a net reduction of interest expense of $2,176 and $2,238, respectively, which were net
of previously accrued interest expense that were ultimately not assessed of $2,670 and $3,169,
respectively, and net penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $526 and $424, respectively, which
were net of previously accrued tax penalties that were ultimately not assessed of $214 and $791,
respectively.
25
Table of Contents
11. Business Segments
We operate through two business groups: our Global E&C Group and our Global Power Group.
Global E&C Group
Our Global E&C Group, which operates worldwide, designs, engineers and constructs onshore and
offshore upstream oil and gas processing facilities, natural gas liquefaction facilities and
receiving terminals, gas-to-liquids facilities, oil refining, chemical and petrochemical,
pharmaceutical and biotechnology facilities and related infrastructure, including power generation
and distribution facilities, and gasification facilities. Our Global E&C Group is also involved in
the design of facilities in new or developing market sectors, including carbon capture and storage,
solid fuel-fired integrated gasification combined-cycle power plants, coal-to-liquids,
coal-to-chemicals and biofuels. Our Global E&C Group generates revenues from design, engineering,
procurement and construction and project management activities pursuant to contracts spanning up to
approximately four years in duration and from returns on its equity investments in various power
production facilities.
Our Global E&C Group provides the following services:
| Design, engineering, project management, construction and construction management services, including the procurement of equipment, materials and services from third-party suppliers and contractors. | ||
| Environmental remediation services, together with related technical, engineering, design and regulatory services. | ||
| Development, engineering, procurement, construction, ownership and operation of power generation facilities, from conventional and renewable sources, and waste-to-energy facilities in Europe. | ||
| Design and supply of direct-fired furnaces used in a wide range of refining, petrochemical, chemical, oil and gas processes, including fired heaters and waste heat recovery units. In addition, our Global E&C Group also designs and supplies the fired heaters which form an integral part of its proprietary delayed coking and hydrogen production technologies. |
26
Table of Contents
Global Power Group
Our Global Power Group designs, manufactures and erects steam generating and auxiliary
equipment for electric power generating stations, district heating and industrial facilities
worldwide and owns and/or operates several cogeneration, independent power production and
waste-to-energy facilities, as well as power generation facilities for the process and
petrochemical industries. Our Global Power Group generates revenues from engineering activities,
equipment supply, construction contracts, operating and maintenance agreements, royalties from
licensing its technology, and from returns on its investments in several power production
facilities.
Our Global Power Groups steam generating equipment includes a full range of technologies,
offering independent power producers, utilities, municipalities and industrial clients high-value
technology solutions for converting a wide range of fuels, such as coal, lignite, petroleum coke,
oil, gas, solar, biomass and municipal solid waste, into steam, which can be used for power
generation, district heating or for industrial processes.
Our Global Power Group offers several other products and services related to steam generators:
| Designs, manufactures and installs auxiliary and replacement equipment for utility power and industrial facilities, including surface condensers, feed water heaters, coal pulverizers, steam generator coils and panels, biomass gasifiers, and replacement parts for steam generators. | ||
| Nitrogen-oxide (NOx) reduction systems and components for pulverized coal steam generators such as selective catalytic reduction systems, low NOx combustion systems, low NOx burners, primary combustion and overfire air systems and components, fuel and combustion air measuring and control systems and components. | ||
| A broad range of site services including construction and erection services, maintenance engineering, steam generator upgrading and life extension, and plant repowering. | ||
| Research and development in the areas of combustion, fluid and gas dynamics, heat transfer, materials and solid mechanics. | ||
| Technology licenses to other steam generator suppliers in select countries. |
Corporate and Finance Group
In addition to these two business groups, which also represent operating segments for
financial reporting purposes, we report corporate center expenses, our captive insurance operation
and expenses related to certain legacy liabilities, such as asbestos, in the Corporate and Finance
Group (C&F Group), which we also treat as an operating segment for financial reporting purposes.
27
Table of Contents
EBITDA is the primary measure of operating performance used by our chief operating
decision maker. We define EBITDA as net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG before interest
expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization.
A reconciliation of EBITDA to net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG is shown below:
Global | Global | C&F | ||||||||||||||
Total | E&C Group | Power Group | Group(1) | |||||||||||||
Fiscal Quarter Ended June 30, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues (third-party) |
$ | 1,005,496 | $ | 842,461 | $ | 163,035 | $ | | ||||||||
EBITDA (2) |
$ | 90,239 | $ | 85,460 | $ | 26,396 | $ | (21,617 | ) | |||||||
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
3,790 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Interest expense |
4,044 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Depreciation and amortization |
11,928 | |||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
78,057 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Provision for income taxes |
15,409 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
62,648 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
3,790 | |||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG |
$ | 58,858 | ||||||||||||||
Fiscal Quarter Ended June 30, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues (third-party) |
$ | 1,308,801 | $ | 1,030,471 | $ | 278,330 | $ | | ||||||||
EBITDA (3) |
$ | 161,962 | $ | 130,628 | $ | 53,780 | $ | (22,446 | ) | |||||||
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
5,130 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Interest expense |
1,302 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Depreciation and amortization |
10,895 | |||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
154,895 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Provision for income taxes |
27,561 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
127,334 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
5,130 | |||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG |
$ | 122,204 | ||||||||||||||
Fiscal Six Months Ended June 30, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues (third-party) |
$ | 1,951,069 | $ | 1,622,145 | $ | 328,924 | $ | | ||||||||
EBITDA (4) |
$ | 201,519 | $ | 185,393 | $ | 56,279 | $ | (40,153 | ) | |||||||
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
7,096 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Interest expense |
8,595 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Depreciation and amortization |
24,987 | |||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
175,033 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Provision for income taxes |
37,019 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
138,014 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
7,096 | |||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG |
$ | 130,918 | ||||||||||||||
Fiscal Six Months Ended June 30, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues (third-party) |
$ | 2,573,324 | $ | 1,982,883 | $ | 590,441 | $ | | ||||||||
EBITDA (5) |
$ | 267,546 | $ | 211,910 | $ | 102,563 | $ | (46,927 | ) | |||||||
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
6,639 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Interest expense |
5,469 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Depreciation and amortization |
21,446 | |||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
247,270 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Provision for income taxes |
45,564 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
201,706 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
6,639 | |||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG |
$ | 195,067 | ||||||||||||||
28
Table of Contents
(1) | Includes general corporate income and expense, our captive insurance operation and the elimination of transactions and balances related to intercompany interest. | |
(2) | Includes in the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010: increased contract profit of $8,600 from the regular revaluation of final estimated contract profit*: $8,100 in our Global E&C Group and $500 in our Global Power Group; and a net provision of $2,344 in our C&F Group on the revaluation of our asbestos liability and related asset**. | |
(3) | Includes in the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009: increased contract profit of $20,200 from the regular revaluation of the final estimated contract profit*: $18,000 in our Global E&C Group and $2,200 in our Global Power Group; and a net provision of $1,756 in our C&F Group on the revaluation of our asbestos liability and related asset**. | |
(4) | Includes in the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2010: increased contract profit of $33,700 from the regular revaluation of final estimated contract profit*: $25,200 in our Global E&C Group and $8,500 in our Global Power Group; a $20,086 curtailment gain in our Global E&C Group on the closure of the U.K. pension plan for future defined benefit accrual; and a net provision of $1,597 in our C&F Group on the revaluation of our asbestos liability and related asset**. | |
(5) | Includes in the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2009: increased contract profit of $26,200 from the regular revaluation of final estimated contract profit*: $24,500 in our Global E&C Group and $1,700 in our Global Power Group; and a net provision of $3,506 in our C&F Group on the revaluation of our asbestos liability and related asset**. | |
* | Please refer to Revenue Recognition on Long-Term Contracts in Note 1 for further information regarding changes in our final estimated contract profit. | |
** | Please refer to Note 12 for further information regarding the revaluation of our asbestos liability and related asset. |
The accounting policies of our business segments are the same as those described in our
summary of significant accounting policies. The only significant intersegment transactions relate
to interest on intercompany balances. We account for interest on those arrangements as if they
were third party transactionsi.e. at current market rates, and we include the elimination of that
activity in the results of the C&F Group.
Operating revenues by industry were as follows:
Fiscal Quarters Ended | Fiscal Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||
Operating Revenues (Third-Party) by Industry: | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Power generation |
$ | 145,782 | $ | 261,859 | $ | 300,962 | $ | 561,156 | ||||||||
Oil refining |
391,860 | 366,879 | 707,698 | 666,994 | ||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical |
11,894 | 19,234 | 24,491 | 34,604 | ||||||||||||
Oil and gas |
301,574 | 304,541 | 599,196 | 594,407 | ||||||||||||
Chemical/petrochemical |
118,663 | 320,642 | 250,770 | 653,682 | ||||||||||||
Power plant operation and maintenance |
26,857 | 27,816 | 51,179 | 51,909 | ||||||||||||
Environmental |
3,477 | 2,886 | 6,601 | 6,682 | ||||||||||||
Other, net of eliminations |
5,389 | 4,944 | 10,172 | 3,890 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,005,496 | $ | 1,308,801 | $ | 1,951,069 | $ | 2,573,324 | ||||||||
12. Litigation and Uncertainties
Asbestos
Some of our U.S. and U.K. subsidiaries are defendants in numerous asbestos-related lawsuits
and out-of-court informal claims pending in the United States and the United Kingdom. Plaintiffs
claim damages for personal injury alleged to have arisen from exposure to or use of asbestos in
connection with work allegedly performed by our subsidiaries during the 1970s and earlier.
29
Table of Contents
United States
A summary of our U.S. claim activity is as follows:
Number of Claims | ||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Quarters Ended | Fiscal Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Open claims at beginning of year |
125,430 | 131,010 | 125,100 | 130,760 | ||||||||||||
New claims |
1,000 | 1,040 | 2,210 | 2,340 | ||||||||||||
Claims resolved |
(3,940 | ) | (1,550 | ) | (4,820 | ) | (2,600 | ) | ||||||||
Open claims at end of period |
122,490 | 130,500 | 122,490 | 130,500 | ||||||||||||
We had the following U.S. asbestos-related assets and liabilities recorded on our
consolidated balance sheet as of the dates set forth below. Total U.S. asbestos-related
liabilities are estimated through the fiscal second quarter of 2025. Although it is likely that
claims will continue to be filed after that date, the uncertainties inherent in any long-term
forecast prevent us from making reliable estimates of the indemnity and defense costs that might be
incurred after that date.
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Asbestos-related assets recorded within: |
||||||||
Accounts and notes receivable-other |
$ | 53,700 | $ | 65,600 | ||||
Asbestos-related insurance recovery receivable |
200,100 | 208,400 | ||||||
Total asbestos-related assets |
$ | 253,800 | $ | 274,000 | ||||
Asbestos-related liabilities recorded within: |
||||||||
Accrued expenses |
$ | 57,400 | $ | 59,800 | ||||
Asbestos-related liability |
293,900 | 316,700 | ||||||
Total asbestos-related liabilities |
$ | 351,300 | $ | 376,500 | ||||
Since fiscal year-end 2004, we have worked with Analysis, Research & Planning
Corporation, or ARPC, nationally recognized consultants in the United States with respect to
projecting asbestos liabilities, to estimate the amount of asbestos-related indemnity and defense
costs at year-end for the next 15 years. Since that time, we have recorded our estimated asbestos
liability at a level consistent with ARPCs reasonable best estimate. Based on its review of
fiscal year 2009 activity, ARPC recommended that the assumptions used to estimate our future
asbestos liability be updated as of fiscal year end 2009. Accordingly, we developed a revised
estimate of our aggregate indemnity and defense costs through fiscal year end 2024 considering the
advice of ARPC. In fiscal year 2009, we revalued our liability for asbestos indemnity and defense
costs through fiscal year end 2024 to $376,500, which brought our liability to a level consistent
with ARPCs reasonable best estimate. Our estimated asbestos liability decreased during the fiscal
six months ended June 30, 2010 as a result of payments totaling approximately $34,000, partially
offset by an increase of $8,800 related to the rolling 15-year asbestos-related liability estimate.
The amount paid for asbestos litigation, defense and case resolution was $18,500 and $34,000
for the fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $13,400 and $34,000
for the fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. During the fiscal quarter
and six months ended June 30, 2010, we had net cash outflows of approximately $200 and $6,600,
respectively, resulting from asbestos liability indemnity and defense costs payments in excess of
insurance settlement proceeds. During the fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009, we
had net cash outflows of approximately $10,800 and $17,200, respectively, resulting from asbestos
liability indemnity and defense costs payments in excess of insurance settlement proceeds. Through
June 30, 2010, total cumulative indemnity costs paid were approximately $714,200 and total
cumulative defense costs paid were approximately $327,600.
As of June 30, 2010, total asbestos-related liabilities were comprised of an estimated
liability of $129,900 relating to open (outstanding) claims being valued and an estimated liability
of $221,400 relating to future unasserted claims through the fiscal second quarter of 2025.
30
Table of Contents
Our liability estimate is based upon the following information and/or assumptions: number of
open claims, forecasted number of future claims, estimated average cost per claim by disease type
mesothelioma, lung cancer and non-malignancies and the breakdown of known and future claims
into disease type mesothelioma, lung cancer or non-malignancies. The total estimated liability,
which has not been discounted for the time value of money, includes both the estimate of forecasted
indemnity amounts and forecasted defense costs. Total defense costs and indemnity liability
payments are estimated to be incurred through the fiscal second quarter of 2025, during which
period the incidence of new claims is forecasted to decrease each year. We believe that it is
likely that there will be new claims filed after the fiscal second quarter of 2025, but in light of
uncertainties inherent in long-term forecasts, we do not believe that we can reasonably estimate
the indemnity and defense costs that might be incurred after the fiscal second quarter of 2025.
Historically, defense costs have represented approximately 31.4% of total defense and indemnity
costs.
The overall historic average combined indemnity and defense cost per resolved claim through
June 30, 2010 has been approximately $2.9. The average cost per resolved claim is increasing and
we believe it will continue to increase in the future.
The asbestos-related asset recorded within accounts and notes receivable-other as of June 30,
2010 reflects amounts due in the next 12 months under executed settlement agreements with insurers
and does not include any estimate for future settlements. The recorded asbestos-related insurance
recovery receivable includes an estimate of recoveries from insurers in the unsettled insurance
coverage litigation (referred to below) based upon the application of New Jersey law to certain
insurance coverage issues and assumptions relating to cost allocation and other factors as well as
an estimate of the amount of recoveries under existing settlements with other insurers. Such
amounts have not been discounted for the time value of money.
Since fiscal year-end 2005, we have worked with Peterson Risk Consulting LLC, nationally
recognized experts in the United States with respect to the estimation of insurance recoveries, to
review our estimate of the value of the settled insurance asset and assist in the estimation of our
unsettled asbestos insurance asset. Based on insurance policy data, historical claim data, future
liability estimates including the expected timing of payments and allocation methodology
assumptions we provided them, Peterson Risk Consulting LLC provided an analysis of the unsettled
insurance asset as of December 31, 2009. We utilized that analysis to determine our estimate of
the value of the unsettled insurance asset as of June 30, 2010.
As of June 30, 2010, we estimated the value of our unsettled asbestos insurance asset related
to ongoing litigation in New York state court with our subsidiaries insurers at $3,700. The
litigation relates to the amounts of insurance coverage available for asbestos-related claims and
the proper allocation of the coverage among our subsidiaries various insurers and our subsidiaries
as self-insurers. We believe that any amounts that our subsidiaries might be allocated as
self-insurer would be immaterial.
An adverse outcome in the pending insurance litigation described above could limit our
remaining insurance recoveries and result in a reduction in our insurance asset. However, a
favorable outcome in all or part of the litigation could increase remaining insurance recoveries
above our current estimate. If we prevail in whole or in part in the litigation, we will re-value
our asset relating to remaining available insurance recoveries based on the asbestos liability
estimated at that time.
Over the last several years, certain of our subsidiaries have entered into settlement
agreements calling for insurers to make lump-sum payments, as well as payments over time, for use
by our subsidiaries to fund asbestos-related indemnity and defense costs and, in certain cases, for
reimbursement for portions of out-of-pocket costs previously incurred.
During the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2010, our subsidiaries reached agreements to
settle their disputed asbestos-related insurance coverage with two additional insurers. As a
result of these settlements, we increased our asbestos-related insurance asset and recorded gains
of $3,000 and $7,000, respectively in the fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010.
We intend to continue to attempt to negotiate additional settlements with insurers where
achievable on a reasonable basis in order to minimize the amount of future costs that we would be
required to fund out of the cash flows generated from our operations. Unless we settle with the
remaining insurers at recovery amounts significantly in excess of our current estimate, it is
likely that the amount of our insurance settlements will not cover all future asbestos-related
costs and we will be required to fund a portion of such future costs, which will reduce our cash
flows and working capital.
31
Table of Contents
In fiscal year 2006, we were successful in our appeal of a New York state trial court decision
that previously had held that New York, rather than New Jersey, law applies in the above coverage
litigation with our subsidiaries insurers, and as a result, we increased our insurance asset and
recorded a gain of $19,500. On February 13, 2007, our subsidiaries insurers were granted
permission by the appellate court to appeal the decision to the New York Court of Appeals, the
states highest court. On October 11, 2007, the New York Court of Appeals upheld the appellate
court decision in our favor.
Even if the coverage litigation is resolved in a manner favorable to us, our insurance
recoveries (both from the litigation and from settlements) may be limited by insolvencies among our
insurers. We have not assumed recovery in the estimate of our asbestos insurance asset from any of
our currently insolvent insurers. Other insurers may become insolvent in the future and our
insurers may fail to reimburse amounts owed to us on a timely basis. Failure to realize the
expected insurance recoveries, or delays in receiving material amounts from our insurers, could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and our cash flows.
Based on the fiscal year-end 2009 liability estimate, an increase of 25% in the average per
claim indemnity settlement amount would increase the liability by $57,500 and the impact on expense
would be dependent upon available additional insurance recoveries. Assuming no change to the
assumptions currently used to estimate our insurance asset, this increase would result in a charge
in the statement of operations in the range of approximately 70% to 80% of the increase in the
liability. Long-term cash flows would ultimately change by the same amount. Should there be an
increase in the estimated liability in excess of this 25%, the percentage of that increase that
would be expected to be funded by additional insurance recoveries will decline.
During the fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized net provisions of
$2,344 and $1,597, respectively, on the revaluation of our asbestos liability and related asset
resulting from the gain of $3,000 and $7,000, respectively, on the settlement of coverage
litigation with asbestos insurance carriers, as noted above, partially offset by increases in our
provision related to the revaluation of our asbestos liability and related asset resulting from our
rolling 15-year asbestos liability estimate.
During the fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010, we had net cash outflows of
approximately $200 and $6,600, respectively, resulting from asbestos liability indemnity and
defense costs payments in excess of insurance settlement proceeds. We expect to have net cash
inflows of $7,900 as a result of insurance settlement proceeds in excess of the asbestos liability
indemnity and defense costs for the full fiscal year 2010. This estimate assumes no additional
settlements with insurance companies or elections by us to fund additional payments. As we
continue to collect cash from insurance settlements and assuming no increase in our
asbestos-related insurance liability or any future insurance settlements, the asbestos-related
insurance receivable recorded on our consolidated balance sheet will continue to decrease.
The estimate of the liabilities and assets related to asbestos claims and recoveries is
subject to a number of uncertainties that may result in significant changes in the current
estimates. Among these are uncertainties as to the ultimate number and type of claims filed, the
amounts of claim costs, the impact of bankruptcies of other companies with asbestos claims,
uncertainties surrounding the litigation process from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and from case to
case, as well as potential legislative changes. Increases in the number of claims filed or costs
to resolve those claims could cause us to increase further the estimates of the costs associated
with asbestos claims and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows.
32
Table of Contents
United Kingdom
Some of our subsidiaries in the United Kingdom have also received claims alleging personal
injury arising from exposure to asbestos. To date, 950 claims have been brought against our U.K.
subsidiaries of which 289 remained open as of June 30, 2010. None of the settled claims has
resulted in material costs to us.
As of June 30, 2010, we recorded total liabilities of $33,200 comprised of an estimated
liability relating to open (outstanding) claims of $5,500 and an estimated liability relating to
future unasserted claims through the fiscal second quarter of 2025 of $27,700. Of the total, $3,200
was recorded in accrued expenses and $30,000 was recorded in asbestos-related liability on the
consolidated balance sheet. An asset in an equal amount was recorded for the expected U.K.
asbestos-related insurance recoveries, of which $3,200 was recorded in accounts and notes
receivable-other and $30,000 was recorded as asbestos-related insurance recovery receivable on the
consolidated balance sheet. The liability estimates are based on a U.K. House of Lords judgment
that pleural plaque claims do not amount to a compensable injury and accordingly, we have reduced
our liability assessment. If this ruling is reversed by legislation, the total asbestos liability
and related asset recorded in the U.K. would be approximately $50,500.
Project Claims
In the ordinary course of business, we are parties to litigation involving clients and
subcontractors arising out of project contracts. Such litigation includes claims and counterclaims
by and against us for canceled contracts, for additional costs incurred in excess of current
contract provisions, as well as for back charges for alleged breaches of warranty and other
contract commitments. If we were found to be liable for any of the claims/counterclaims against
us, we would incur a charge against earnings to the extent a reserve had not been established for
the matter in our accounts or if the liability exceeds established reserves.
Due to the inherent commercial, legal and technical uncertainties underlying the estimation of
all of the project claims described herein, the amounts ultimately realized or paid by us could
differ materially from the balances, if any, included in our financial statements, which could
result in additional material charges against earnings, and which could also materially adversely
impact our financial condition and cash flows.
Power Plant Dispute Ireland
In 2006, a dispute arose with a client because of material corrosion that occurred at two
power plants we designed and built in Ireland, which began operation in December 2005 and June
2006. There was also corrosion that occurred to subcontractor-provided emissions control equipment
and induction fans at the back-end of the power plants which is due principally to the low set
point temperature design of the emissions control equipment that was set by our subcontractor. We
have identified technical solutions to resolve the boiler tube corrosion and emissions control
equipment corrosion and during the fiscal fourth quarter of 2008 entered into a settlement with the
client under which we are implementing the technical solutions in exchange for a full release of
all claims related to the corrosion (including a release from the clients right under the original
contract to reject the plants under our availability guaranty) and the clients agreement to share
the cost of the ameliorative work related to the boiler tube corrosion. Accordingly, the client
withdrew its notice of arbitration in January 2009, which was originally filed in May 2008.
Between fiscal year 2006 and the end of fiscal year 2008, we recorded charges totaling $61,700
in relation to this project. The implementation of the technical solutions is anticipated to be
completed in 2011.
Power Plant Arbitration North America
In January 2010, we commenced arbitration against our client in connection with a power plant
project in Louisiana seeking, among other relief, a declaration as to our rights under our purchase
order with respect to $17,800 in retention monies and an $82,000 letter of credit held by the
client. The purchase order was for the supply of two boilers and ancillary equipment for the
project. The project was substantially completed and released for commercial operation in February
2010. Our client is the projects engineering, procurement and construction contractor. Under the
terms of the purchase order, significant reductions to the retention and letter of credit monies
are to occur upon the projects achievement of substantial completion, which has been delayed due
to failures on our clients part to properly manage and execute the project. The client has taken
the position that we are responsible for the projects delays and, subsequent to service of our
arbitration demand, has served its own arbitration demand, seeking to assess us with all associated
late substantial completion liquidated damages under our purchase order, together with liquidated
damages for alleged late material and equipment deliveries, and back charges for corrective work
and other damages arising out of allegedly defective materials and equipment delivered by us. The
client contends it is owed in
33
Table of Contents
excess of $69,000 under our purchase order as a result of our alleged failures. There is a
risk that the client will attempt to call all or part of the letter of credit during the pendency
of the proceeding. We are of the opinion that any such call would be wrongful and entitle us to
seek return of the funds and any other damages arising out of the call. We cannot predict the
ultimate outcome of this dispute at this time.
Camden County Waste-to-Energy Project
One of our project subsidiaries, Camden County Energy Recovery Associates, LP (CCERA) owns
and operates a waste-to-energy facility in Camden County, New Jersey (the Project). The
Pollution Control Finance Authority of Camden County (PCFA) issued bonds to finance the
construction of the Project and to acquire a landfill for Camden Countys use. Pursuant to a loan
agreement between the PCFA and CCERA, proceeds from the bonds were loaned by the PCFA to CCERA and
used by CCERA to finance the construction of the facility. Accordingly, the proceeds of this loan
were recorded as debt on CCERAs balance sheet and, therefore, are included in our consolidated
balance sheet. CCERAs obligation to service the debt incurred pursuant to the loan agreement is
limited to depositing all tipping fees and electric revenues received with the trustee of the PCFA
bonds. The trustee is required to pay CCERA its service fees prior to servicing the PCFA bonds.
CCERA has no other debt repayment obligations under the loan agreement with the PCFA.
In 1997, the United States Supreme Court effectively invalidated New Jerseys long-standing
municipal solid waste flow rules and regulations, eliminating the guaranteed supply of municipal
solid waste to the Project with its corresponding tipping fee revenue. As a result, tipping fees
have been reduced to market rate in order to provide a steady supply of fuel to the Project. Since
the ruling, those market-based revenues have not been, and are not expected to be, sufficient to
service the debt on outstanding bonds issued by the PCFA to finance the construction of the
Project.
In 1998, CCERA filed suit against the PCFA and other parties seeking, among other things, to
void the applicable contracts and agreements governing the Project (Camden County Energy Recovery
Assoc. v. N.J. Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Superior Court of New Jersey, Mercer
County, L-268-98). Since 1999, the State of New Jersey has provided subsidies sufficient to ensure
the payment of each of the PCFAs debt service payments as they became due, but the States current
appropriations act includes an appropriation that appears insufficient to make the full debt
service payment due in December 2010. The bonds outstanding in connection with the Project were
issued by the PCFA, not by us or CCERA, and the bonds are not guaranteed by either us or CCERA. In
the litigation, the defendants have asserted, among other things, that an equitable portion of the
outstanding debt on the Project should be allocated to CCERA even though CCERA did not guarantee
the bonds.
At this time, we cannot determine the ultimate outcome of the foregoing and the potential
effects on CCERA and the Project. If the State of New Jersey were to fail to subsidize the debt
service, and there were to be a default on a debt service payment, the bondholders might proceed to
attempt to exercise their remedies, by among other things, seizing the collateral securing the
bonds. We do not believe this collateral includes CCERAs plant.
Environmental Matters
CERCLA and Other Remedial Matters
Under U.S. federal statutes, such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), the Clean Water Act and
the Clean Air Act, and similar state laws, the current owner or operator of real property and the
past owners or operators of real property (if disposal of toxic or hazardous substances took place
during such past ownership or operation) may be jointly and severally liable for the costs of
removal or remediation of toxic or hazardous substances on or under their property, regardless of
whether such materials were released in violation of law or whether the owner or operator knew of,
or was responsible for, the presence of such substances. Moreover, under CERCLA and similar state
laws, persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances may also
be jointly and severally liable for the costs of the removal or remediation of such substances at a
disposal or treatment site, whether or not such site was owned or operated by such person, which we
refer to as an off-site facility. Liability at such off-site facilities is typically allocated
among all of the financially viable responsible parties based on such factors as the relative
amount of waste contributed to a site, toxicity of such waste, relationship of the waste
contributed by a party to the remedy chosen for the site and other factors.
We currently own and operate industrial facilities and we have also transferred our interests
in industrial facilities that we formerly owned or operated. It is likely that as a result of our
current or former operations,
34
Table of Contents
hazardous substances have affected the facilities or the real property on which they are or
were situated. We also have received and may continue to receive claims pursuant to indemnity
obligations from the present owners of facilities we have transferred, which claims may require us
to incur costs for investigation and/or remediation.
We are currently engaged in the investigation and/or remediation under the supervision of the
applicable regulatory authorities at two of our or our subsidiaries former facilities (including
Mountain Top, which is described below). In addition, we sometimes engage in investigation and/or
remediation without the supervision of a regulatory authority. Although we do not expect the
environmental conditions at our present or former facilities to cause us to incur material costs in
excess of those for which reserves have been established, it is possible that various events could
cause us to incur costs materially in excess of our present reserves in order to fully resolve any
issues surrounding those conditions. Further, no assurance can be provided that we will not
discover additional environmental conditions at our currently or formerly owned or operated
properties, or that additional claims will not be made with respect to formerly owned properties,
requiring us to incur material expenditures to investigate and/or remediate such conditions.
We have been notified that we are a potentially responsible party (PRP) under CERCLA or
similar state laws at three off-site facilities. At each of these sites, our liability should be
substantially less than the total site remediation costs because the percentage of waste
attributable to us compared to that attributable to all other PRPs is low. We do not believe that
our share of cleanup obligations at any of the off-site facilities as to which we have received a
notice of potential liability will exceed $500 in the aggregate. We have also received and
responded to a request for information from the United States Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) regarding a fourth off-site facility. We do not know what, if any, further actions USEPA
may take regarding this fourth off-site facility.
Mountain Top
In February 1988, one of our subsidiaries, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation (FWEC), entered
into a Consent Agreement and Order with the USEPA and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Protection (PADEP) regarding its former manufacturing facility in Mountain Top, Pennsylvania.
The order essentially required FWEC to investigate and remediate as necessary contaminants,
including trichloroethylene (TCE), in the soil and groundwater at the facility. Pursuant to the
order, in 1993 FWEC installed a pump and treat system to remove TCE from the groundwater. It is
not possible at the present time to predict how long FWEC will be required to operate and maintain
this system.
In the fall of 2004, FWEC sampled the private domestic water supply wells of certain
residences in Mountain Top and identified approximately 30 residences whose wells contained TCE at
levels in excess of Safe Drinking Water Act standards. The subject residences are located
approximately one mile to the southwest of where the TCE previously was discovered in the soils at
the former FWEC facility. Since that time, FWEC, USEPA, and PADEP have cooperated in responding to
the foregoing. Although FWEC believed the evidence available was not sufficient to support a
determination that FWEC was responsible for the TCE in the residential wells, FWEC immediately
provided the affected residences with bottled water, followed by water filters, and, pursuant to a
settlement agreement with USEPA, it hooked them up to the public water system. Pursuant to an
amendment of the settlement agreement, FWEC subsequently agreed with USEPA to arrange and pay for
the hookup of approximately five additional residences, even though TCE has not been detected in
the wells at those residences. FWEC is incurring costs related to public outreach and
communications in the affected area, and it may be required to pay the agencies costs in
overseeing and responding to the situation. FWEC is also incurring further costs in connection
with a Remedial Investigation / Feasibility Study (RI/FS) that in March 2009 it agreed to
conduct. In April 2009, USEPA proposed for listing on the National Priorities List (NPL) an area
consisting of its former manufacturing facility and the affected residences, but it also stated
that the proposed listing may not be finalized if FWEC complies with its agreement to conduct the
RI/FS. FWEC submitted comments opposing the proposed listing. FWEC has accrued its best estimate
of the cost of the foregoing and it reviews this estimate on a quarterly basis.
Other costs to which FWEC could be exposed could include, among other things, FWECs counsel
and consulting fees, further agency oversight and/or response costs, costs and/or exposure related
to potential litigation, and other costs related to possible further investigation and/or
remediation. At present, it is not possible to determine whether FWEC will be determined to be
liable for some or all of the items described in this paragraph or to reliably estimate the
potential liability associated with the items. If one or more third-parties are determined to be a
source of the TCE, FWEC will evaluate its options regarding the potential recovery of the costs
FWEC has incurred, which options could include seeking to recover those costs from those determined
to be a source.
35
Table of Contents
Other Environmental Matters
Our operations, especially our manufacturing and power plants, are subject to comprehensive
laws adopted for the protection of the environment and to regulate land use. The laws of primary
relevance to our operations regulate the discharge of emissions into the water and air, but can
also include hazardous materials handling and disposal, waste disposal and other types of
environmental regulation. These laws and regulations in many cases require a lengthy and complex
process of obtaining licenses, permits and approvals from the applicable regulatory agencies.
Noncompliance with these laws can result in the imposition of material civil or criminal fines or
penalties. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with existing environmental laws.
However, no assurance can be provided that we will not become the subject of enforcement
proceedings that could cause us to incur material expenditures. Further, no assurance can be
provided that we will not need to incur material expenditures beyond our existing reserves to make
capital improvements or operational changes necessary to allow us to comply with future
environmental laws.
With regard to the foregoing, the waste-to-energy facility operated by our CCERA project
subsidiary is subject to certain revisions to New Jerseys mercury air emission regulations. The
revisions make CCERAs mercury control requirements more stringent, especially when the last phase
of the revisions becomes effective in 2012. CCERAs management believes that the data generated
during recent stack testing tends to indicate that the facility will be able to comply with even
the most stringent of the regulatory revisions without installing additional control equipment.
Even if the equipment had to be installed, CCERA could assert that the projects sponsor would be
responsible to pay for the equipment. However, the sponsor may not have sufficient funds to do so
or may assert that it is not so responsible. Estimates of the cost of installing the additional
control equipment are approximately $30,000 based on our last assessment.
In June 2010, CCERA received an Administrative Order of Revocation and Notice of Civil
Administrative Penalty Assessment from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
(NJDEP). The Administrative Order alleged that CCERA had violated its permit emission limit for
total PM-10, particulate matter 10 micrometers or less, during its March 2010 annual stack testing
(8.08 pounds per hour against a permit limit of 7.02 pounds per hour), and it provided for the
revocation of the permit to operate CCERAs Unit A, one of CCERAs three units. CCERA re-tested
Unit A on June 22, 2010, and the re-test results indicate that the PM-10 emissions were well below
its permit limit. In response to CCERAs request for a hearing and a stay of the revocation order,
NJDEP, on July 8, 2010, agreed to stay the revocation of the above-described permit until October
15, 2010. Management intends to seek rescission of the revocation by NJDEP, but, at present, there
can be no assurance that NJDEP will agree to rescind the revocation, and management cannot predict
what impact the foregoing might have on CCERA.
36
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
The following is managements discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have
affected our financial condition and results of operations for the periods indicated below. This
discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements
and notes thereto included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and our annual report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, which we refer to as our 2009 Form 10-K.
Safe Harbor Statement
This managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations,
other sections of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and other reports and oral statements made by
our representatives from time to time may contain forward-looking statements that are based on our
assumptions, expectations and projections about Foster Wheeler AG and the various industries within
which we operate. These include statements regarding our expectations about revenues (including as
expressed by our backlog), our liquidity, the outcome of litigation and legal proceedings and
recoveries from customers for claims and the costs of current and future asbestos claims and the
amount and timing of related insurance recoveries. Such forward-looking statements by their nature
involve a degree of risk and uncertainty. We caution that a variety of factors, including but not
limited to the factors described in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in our 2009 Form 10-K, which
we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on February 25, 2010, and the
following, could cause business conditions and our results to differ materially from what is
contained in forward-looking statements:
| benefits, effects or results of our redomestication or the relocation of our principal executive offices to Geneva, Switzerland; | ||
| further deterioration in the economic conditions in the United States and other major international economies; | ||
| changes in investment by the oil and gas, oil refining, chemical/petrochemical and power generation industries; | ||
| changes in the financial condition of our customers; | ||
| changes in regulatory environments; | ||
| changes in project design or schedules; | ||
| contract cancellations; | ||
| changes in our estimates of costs to complete projects; | ||
| changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies worldwide; | ||
| compliance with laws and regulations relating to our global operations; | ||
| currency fluctuations; | ||
| war and/or terrorist attacks on facilities either owned by us or where equipment or services are or may be provided by us; | ||
| interruptions to shipping lanes or other methods of transit; | ||
| outcomes of pending and future litigation, including litigation regarding our liability for damages and insurance coverage for asbestos exposure; | ||
| protection and validity of our patents and other intellectual property rights; | ||
| increasing competition by non-U.S. and U.S. companies; | ||
| compliance with our debt covenants; |
37
Table of Contents
| recoverability of claims against our customers and others by us and claims by third parties against us; and | ||
| changes in estimates used in our critical accounting policies. |
Other factors and assumptions not identified above were also involved in the formation of
these forward-looking statements and the failure of such other assumptions to be realized, as well
as other factors, may also cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Most of
these factors are difficult to predict accurately and are generally beyond our control. You should
consider the areas of risk described above in connection with any forward-looking statements that
may be made by us.
In addition, this managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations contains several statements regarding current and future general global economic
conditions. These statements are based on our compilation of economic data and analyses from a
variety of external sources. While we believe these statements to be reasonably accurate, global
economic conditions are difficult to analyze and predict and are subject to significant uncertainty
and as a result, these statements may prove to be wrong. The challenges and drivers for each of
our business segments are discussed in more detail in the section entitled Results of
Operations-Business Segments, within this Item 2.
We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are advised, however, to consult any
additional disclosures we make in proxy statements, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, annual reports
on Form 10-K and current reports on Form 8-K filed with the SEC.
Overview
We operate through two business groups the Global Engineering & Construction Group, which
we refer to as our Global E&C Group, and our Global Power Group. In addition to these two business
groups, we also report corporate center expenses, our captive insurance operation and expenses
related to certain legacy liabilities, such as asbestos, in the Corporate and Finance Group, which
we refer to as the C&F Group.
Since fiscal year 2007, we have been exploring, and intend to continue to explore,
acquisitions within the engineering and construction industry to strategically complement or expand
on our technical capabilities or access to new market segments. We are also exploring acquisitions
within the power generation industry to complement our Global Power Group product offering.
However, there is no assurance that we will consummate any acquisitions in the future.
During fiscal year 2009, we acquired substantially all of the assets of the offshore
engineering division of OPE Holdings Ltd., a Canadian company that is listed on the TSX Venture
Exchange and which we refer to as OPE, and we acquired substantially all of the assets of the
Houston operations of Atlas Engineering, Inc., a privately held company. Both of these
acquisitions expand our Global E&C Groups upstream oil and gas engineering services capabilities.
38
Table of Contents
Results for the Fiscal Second Quarter and Six Months ended June 30, 2010
Our summary financial results for the fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009 are as follows:
Fiscal Quarters Ended | Fiscal Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data: |
||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues (1) |
$ | 1,005,496 | $ | 1,308,801 | $ | 1,951,069 | $ | 2,573,324 | ||||||||
Contract profit (1) |
147,860 | 219,959 | 319,942 | 382,711 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses (1) |
69,515 | 69,024 | 139,820 | 138,272 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG |
58,858 | 122,204 | 130,918 | 195,067 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per share : |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
0.46 | 0.97 | 1.03 | 1.54 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
0.46 | 0.96 | 1.02 | 1.54 | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities (2) |
51,325 | 93,954 |
(1) | Please refer to the section entitled Results of Operations within this Item 2 for further discussion. | |
(2) | Please refer to the section entitled Liquidity and Capital Resources within this Item 2 for further discussion. |
Our cash and cash equivalents were $973,900 and $997,200 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively.
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG decreased in the fiscal second quarter of 2010,
compared to the same period of 2009, primarily as a result of decreased contract profit.
Please refer to the discussion within the section entitled Results of Operations within this
Item 2.
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG decreased in the fiscal six months ended June 30,
2010, compared to the same period of 2009, primarily as a result of decreased contract
profit and an increase in our effective tax rate, partially offset by a curtailment gain related to
our U.K. pension plan that has been closed for future benefit accrual. Please refer to the
discussion within the section entitled Results of Operations within this Item 2.
Challenges and Drivers
Our primary operating focus continues to be booking quality new business and executing our
contracts well. The global markets in which we operate are largely dependent on overall economic
growth and the resultant demand for oil and gas, electric power, petrochemicals and refined
products.
In our Global E&C business, we expect long-term demand to be strong for the end products
produced by our clients, and to continue to stimulate investment by our clients in new and expanded
plants. The global economic downturn experienced in 2008 and 2009 caused many of our E&C clients to
reevaluate the size, timing and scope of their capital spending plans in relation to the kinds of
energy, petrochemical and pharmaceutical projects that we execute, but as the global economic
outlook continues to improve, we have noted signs of market improvement. We are seeing increasing
numbers of our clients implementing their 2010 capital spending plans. A number of these clients
are, however, releasing tranches of work on a piecemeal basis, conducting further analysis before
deciding to proceed with their investments or reevaluating the size, timing or configuration of
specific planned projects. We are also seeing clients re-activating planned projects that were
placed on hold in 2009. The challenges and drivers for our Global E&C Group are discussed in more
detail in the section entitled Results of Operations-Business Segments-Global E&C Group-Overview
of Segment, within this Item 2.
39
Table of Contents
In our Global Power Group business, new order activity has been unfavorably affected by
several trends which began in fiscal year 2008 and have continued through fiscal year 2010. We
believe, however, that demand for new solid-fuel steam generators has begun to improve in fiscal
year 2010, driven primarily by growing electricity demand and industrial production as economies
around the world recover from the recent global economic downturn. The challenges and drivers for
our Global Power Group are discussed in more detail in the section entitled Results of
Operations-Business Segments-Global Power Group-Overview of Segment, within this Item 2.
New Orders and Backlog of Unfilled Orders
Fiscal Quarters Ended | ||||||||||||
June 30, | March 31, | June 30, | ||||||||||
2010 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
New orders, measured in future revenues |
$ | 935,600 | $ | 938,500 | $ | 933,800 |
As of | ||||||||||||
June 30, | March 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||
2010 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Backlog of unfilled orders, measured in
future revenues |
$ | 3,713,300 | $ | 4,027,800 | $ | 4,112,800 | ||||||
Backlog, measured in Foster Wheeler scope* |
$ | 2,229,800 | $ | 2,306,700 | $ | 2,068,600 | ||||||
E&C man-hours in backlog (in thousands) |
14,100 | 13,500 | 12,700 |
* | As defined in the section entitled Backlog and New Orders within this Item 2. |
Our Global E&C Groups new orders, measured in future revenues, were $770,800 in the
fiscal second quarter of 2010, which increased compared to $476,300 in the fiscal first quarter of
2010 and decreased compared to $847,700 in the fiscal second quarter of 2009. These new orders are
inclusive of flow-through revenues, as defined below, of $283,200, $58,100 and $335,700 for the
fiscal second quarter of 2010, fiscal first quarter of 2010 and fiscal second quarter of 2009,
respectively.
Our Global Power Groups new orders were $164,800 in the fiscal second quarter of 2010, which
decreased compared to $462,200 in the fiscal first quarter of 2010 and increased compared to
$86,100 in the fiscal second quarter of 2009.
The challenges and drivers for our Global E&C Group and our Global Power Group are discussed
in more detail in the section entitled Business Segments, within this Item 2.
Results of Operations:
Operating Revenues:
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
Fiscal Quarters Ended |
$ | 1,005,496 | $ | 1,308,801 | $ | (303,305 | ) | (23.2 | )% | |||||||
Fiscal Six Months Ended |
$ | 1,951,069 | $ | 2,573,324 | $ | (622,255 | ) | (24.2 | )% |
We operate through two business groups: our Global E&C Group and our Global Power Group.
Please refer to the section entitled Business Segments, within this Item 2, for a discussion of
the products and services of our business segments.
The composition of our operating revenues varies from period to period based on the portfolio
of contracts in execution during any given period. Our operating revenues are therefore dependent
on our portfolio of contracts, the strength of the various geographic markets and industries we
serve and our ability to address those markets and industries.
40
Table of Contents
The geographic dispersion of our consolidated operating revenues for the fiscal quarter and
six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 based upon where our projects are being executed,
were as follows:
Fiscal Quarters Ended | Fiscal Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | $ Change | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
$ | 208,584 | $ | 439,102 | $ | (230,518 | ) | (52.5 | )% | $ | 421,215 | $ | 830,882 | $ | (409,667 | ) | (49.3 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Australasia and other* |
308,450 | 266,571 | 41,879 | 15.7 | % | 596,490 | 515,938 | 80,552 | 15.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
223,439 | 286,445 | (63,006 | ) | (22.0 | )% | 423,349 | 577,860 | (154,511 | ) | (26.7 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Middle East |
51,515 | 110,164 | (58,649 | ) | (53.2 | )% | 125,438 | 218,006 | (92,568 | ) | (42.5 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
150,268 | 157,761 | (7,493 | ) | (4.7 | )% | 276,909 | 327,746 | (50,837 | ) | (15.5 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
South America |
63,240 | 48,758 | 14,482 | 29.7 | % | 107,668 | 102,892 | 4,776 | 4.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,005,496 | $ | 1,308,801 | $ | (303,305 | ) | (23.2 | )% | $ | 1,951,069 | $ | 2,573,324 | $ | (622,255 | ) | (24.2 | )% | ||||||||||||||
* | Australasia and other primarily represents Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands. |
Our consolidated operating revenues declined in the fiscal quarter and six months ended
June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2009. The declines in both periods were
primarily the result of decreased flow-through revenues, as described below, and decreased volume
of business in our Global Power Group. Our consolidated operating revenues decreased approximately
16% and 21%, respectively, excluding the impact of the change in flow-through revenues and foreign
currency fluctuations in the fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the
same periods in 2009.
Flow-through revenues and costs result when we purchase materials, equipment or third-party
services on behalf of our customer on a reimbursable basis with no profit on the materials,
equipment or third-party services and where we have the overall responsibility as the contractor
for the engineering specifications and procurement or procurement services for the materials,
equipment or third-party services included in flow-through costs. Flow-through revenues and costs
do not impact contract profit or net earnings.
Our Global E&C Group experienced decreases in operating revenues of 18% in both the fiscal
quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods in 2009, which include the
impact of decreased flow-through revenues in both periods. Excluding flow-through revenues, our
Global E&C Groups operating revenues decreased 6% in both the fiscal quarter and six months ended
June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods in 2009. The decrease in the fiscal second quarter of
2010, compared to the same period in 2009, resulted from foreign currency fluctuations relative to
the U.S. dollar, primarily driven by the British pound and Euro, and a decline in volume of
business. The decrease in the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period
in 2009, resulted from a decline in volume of business, while foreign currency fluctuations had a
relatively minimal impact. Please refer to the section entitled Business Segments, within this
Item 2, for a discussion of our view of the market outlook for our Global E&C Group.
Our Global Power Group experienced decreases in operating revenues of 41% and 44%,
respectively, in the fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same
periods in 2009, which was the result of decreased volume of business. Please refer to the section
entitled Business Segments, within this Item 2, for a discussion of our view of the market
outlook for our Global Power Group.
Contract Profit:
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
Fiscal Quarters Ended |
$ | 147,860 | $ | 219,959 | $ | (72,099 | ) | (32.8 | )% | |||||||
Fiscal Six Months Ended |
$ | 319,942 | $ | 382,711 | $ | (62,769 | ) | (16.4 | )% |
Contract profit is computed as operating revenues less cost of operating revenues.
Flow-through amounts are recorded both as operating revenues and cost of operating revenues with
no contract profit. Contract profit margins are computed as contract profit divided by operating
revenues. Flow-through revenues reduce the contract profit margin as they are included in
operating revenues without any corresponding impact on contract profit. As a result, we analyze
our contract profit margins excluding the impact of flow-through revenues as we believe that this
is a more accurate measure of our operating performance.
The decrease in our contract profit in the fiscal second quarter of 2010, compared to the same
period in 2009, resulted from decreases in both our operating groups. Please refer to the
section entitled Business Segments, within this Item 2, for further information.
41
Table of Contents
Both of our operating groups experienced decreased contract profit in the fiscal six months
ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, which was partially offset by a
curtailment gain of approximately $20,100 related to our U.K. pension plan that has been closed for
future benefit accrual. Please refer to the section entitled Business Segments, within this
Item 2, for further information.
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses:
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
Fiscal Quarters Ended |
$ | 69,515 | $ | 69,024 | $ | 491 | 0.7 | % | ||||||||
Fiscal Six Months Ended |
$ | 139,820 | $ | 138,272 | $ | 1,548 | 1.1 | % |
SG&A expenses include the costs associated with general management, sales pursuit,
including proposal expenses, and research and development costs.
The increase in SG&A expenses in the fiscal second quarter of 2010, compared to the same
period in 2009, resulted primarily from an increase in general overhead costs of $2,300, which was
partially offset by decreases in sales pursuit costs of $1,300 and research and development costs
of $500.
The increase in SG&A expenses in the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the
same period in 2009, resulted primarily from an increase in sales pursuit costs of $1,900, which
was partially offset by a decrease in research and development costs of $700, while general
overhead costs were relatively unchanged.
Other Income, net:
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
Fiscal Quarters Ended |
$ | 11,419 | $ | 11,490 | $ | (71 | ) | (0.6 | )% | |||||||
Fiscal Six Months Ended |
$ | 19,751 | $ | 19,693 | $ | 58 | 0.3 | % |
Other income, net in the fiscal second quarter of 2010 consisted primarily of $4,800 in
equity earnings generated from our investments, primarily from our ownership interests in build,
own and operate projects in Italy and $2,400 of value-added tax refunds and other non-income tax
credits. Other income, net was relatively unchanged in the fiscal second quarter of 2010, compared
to the same period in 2009, which was the net result of decreases in equity earnings in our Global
Power Groups project in Chile of $4,000 and our Global E&C Groups projects in Italy of $2,300,
offset by other activities which included $1,700 of value-added tax refunds and other non-income
tax credits.
Other income, net in the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2010 consisted primarily
of $11,300 in equity earnings generated from our investments, primarily from our ownership
interests in build, own and operate projects in Italy and Chile and $3,200 of value-added tax
refunds and other non-income tax credits. Other income, net was relatively unchanged in the fiscal
six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009. This was the net result of
decreases in equity earnings in our Global Power Groups project in Chile of $5,000 and our Global
E&C Groups projects in Italy of $1,300, offset by other activities including $2,500 of value-added
tax refunds and other non-income tax credits.
Our Global Power Groups project in Chile experienced decreased equity earnings in the fiscal
quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010, as compared to the same periods in 2009, as a result of
the project facilitys suspension of normal operating activities since February 2010 due to
significant damage caused by an earthquake that occurred off the coast of Chile on February 27,
2010. Our Global Power Groups equity earnings assume an estimated recovery under a property
damage insurance policy sufficient to repair the facility and an estimated recovery under a
business interruption insurance policy for fixed costs until the facility becomes fully
operational; however, in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance on business interruption
insurance, there is currently no estimated recovery for lost profits. A claim for lost profits has
recently been submitted to the insurance carrier of the project and we expect that the project will
be able to record an estimate for lost profits as the claim is finalized. We believe the property
damage insurance coverage in effect will be sufficient to cover the estimated costs of repairing
the facility and to substantially compensate the project for the loss of profits while the facility
has suspended operations until such time as normal operating activities can resume.
42
Table of Contents
Other Deductions, net:
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
Fiscal Quarters Ended |
$ | 8,049 | $ | 6,898 | $ | 1,151 | 16.7 | % | ||||||||
Fiscal Six Months Ended |
$ | 19,737 | $ | 12,985 | $ | 6,752 | 52.0 | % |
Other deductions, net in the fiscal second quarter of 2010 consisted primarily of $6,400
of legal fees, $1,000 of bank fees and $700 of consulting fees.
Other deductions, net in the fiscal second quarter of 2009 consisted primarily of $3,300 of
legal fees, $1,400 of consulting fees, $900 of bank fees, a $500 provision for dispute resolution
and environmental remediation costs, a $500 loss on the sale of fixed assets and a net $500 in tax
penalties, which included $200 of previously accrued tax penalties that were ultimately not
assessed, partially offset by $800 of net foreign exchange gains. Net foreign exchange gains
include the net amount of transaction gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations
on transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of our subsidiaries.
Other deductions, net in the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2010 consisted primarily of
$9,900 of legal fees, $4,600 of net foreign exchange transaction losses, $2,200 of consulting fees
and $1,900 of bank fees, partially offset by a net reduction in tax penalties of $100, which
included $1,400 of previously accrued tax penalties that were ultimately not assessed. The net
foreign exchange transaction losses in the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2010 resulted primarily
from exchange rate fluctuations on cash balances held by certain of our subsidiaries that were
denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of those subsidiaries.
Other deductions, net in the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2009 consisted primarily of
$7,400 of legal fees, $2,000 of consulting fees, $1,900 of bank fees, a net $400 in tax penalties,
which included $800 of previously accrued tax penalties that were ultimately not assessed, a $600
provision for dispute resolution and environmental remediation costs and a $500 loss on the sale of
fixed assets, partially offset by $1,500 of net foreign exchange gains.
Interest Income:
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
Fiscal Quarters Ended |
$ | 2,730 | $ | 2,426 | $ | 304 | 12.5 | % | ||||||||
Fiscal Six Months Ended |
$ | 5,089 | $ | 5,098 | $ | (9 | ) | (0.2 | )% |
Interest income in the fiscal second quarter of 2010 increased, compared to the same
period in 2009, which was primarily the result of increased income generated from higher average
cash and cash equivalents balances. Interest income in the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2010
was relatively unchanged, compared to the same period in 2009, which was the net result of
decreased interest income from lower interest rates and investment yields, offset by increased
income generated from higher average cash and cash equivalents balances during fiscal year 2010 and
a slight favorable impact from foreign currency fluctuations.
Interest Expense:
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
Fiscal Quarters Ended |
$ | 4,044 | $ | 1,302 | $ | 2,742 | 210.6 | % | ||||||||
Fiscal Six Months Ended |
$ | 8,595 | $ | 5,469 | $ | 3,126 | 57.2 | % |
The increase in interest expense in the fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30,
2010, compared to the same periods in 2009, primarily resulted from net increases of $2,500 and
$3,500, respectively, in accrued interest expense on unrecognized tax benefits.
During the fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded net accrued interest
expense on unrecognized tax benefits of $300 and $1,300, respectively, which both periods were net
of previously accrued interest expense that was ultimately not assessed of $1,100. During the
fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded a net reduction of accrued interest
expense on unrecognized tax benefits in both periods of $2,200, which were net of previously
accrued interest expense that was ultimately not assessed of $2,700 and $3,200, respectively.
43
Table of Contents
Net Asbestos-Related Provision:
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
Fiscal Quarters Ended |
$ | 2,344 | $ | 1,756 | $ | 588 | 33.5 | % | ||||||||
Fiscal Six Months Ended |
$ | 1,597 | $ | 3,506 | $ | (1,909 | ) | (54.4 | )% |
The increase in the net asbestos-related provision in the fiscal second quarter of 2010,
compared to the same period in 2009, primarily resulted from an increase of $3,600 to our provision
related to the revaluation of our asbestos liability, partially offset by a gain of $3,000 on the
settlement of coverage litigation with an asbestos insurance carrier.
The decrease in the net asbestos-related provision in the fiscal six months ended June 30,
2010, compared to the same period in 2009, primarily resulted from a gain of $7,000 on the
settlement of coverage litigation with two asbestos insurance carriers, partially offset by an
increase of $5,100 to our provision related to the revaluation of our asbestos liability.
Provision for Income Taxes:
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
Fiscal Quarters Ended |
$ | 15,409 | $ | 27,561 | $ | (12,152 | ) | (44.1 | )% | |||||||
Effective Tax Rate |
19.7 | % | 17.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Fiscal Six Months Ended |
$ | 37,019 | $ | 45,564 | $ | (8,545 | ) | (18.8 | )% | |||||||
Effective Tax Rate |
21.1 | % | 18.4 | % |
The tax provision for each year-to-date period is calculated by multiplying pretax income
by the estimated annual effective tax rate for such period. Our effective tax rate can fluctuate
significantly from period to period and may differ significantly from the U.S. federal statutory
rate as a result of income taxed in various non-U.S. jurisdictions with rates different from the
U.S. statutory rate, as a result of our inability to recognize a tax benefit for losses generated
by certain unprofitable operations and as a result of the varying mix of income earned in the
jurisdictions in which we operate. In addition, our deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation
allowance when, based upon available evidence, it is more likely than not that the tax benefit of
loss carryforwards (or other deferred tax assets) will not be realized in the future. In periods
when operating units subject to a valuation allowance generate pretax earnings, the corresponding
reduction in the valuation allowance favorably impacts our effective tax rate. Conversely, in
periods when operating units subject to a valuation allowance generate pretax losses, the
corresponding increase in the valuation allowance has an unfavorable impact on our effective tax
rate.
44
Table of Contents
Fiscal Year 2010
Our effective tax rate for the fiscal first six months of 2010 was lower than the U.S.
statutory rate of 35% due principally to the net impact of the following:
| Income earned in tax jurisdictions with tax rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate, which is expected to contribute to an approximate 18-percentage point reduction in the effective tax rate for the full year 2010. | ||
| A valuation allowance increase because we are unable to recognize a tax benefit for losses subject to valuation allowance in certain jurisdictions (primarily the United States), which is expected to contribute an approximate five-percentage point increase in the effective tax rate for the full year 2010. |
Fiscal Year 2009
Our effective tax rate for the fiscal first six months of 2009 was lower than the U.S.
statutory rate of 35% due principally to the net impact of the following:
| Income earned in tax jurisdictions with tax rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate, which contributed to an approximate 18-percentage point reduction in the effective tax rate. | ||
| A valuation allowance increase because we were unable to recognize a tax benefit for losses subject to valuation allowance in certain jurisdictions (primarily the United States), which contributed to an approximate three-percentage point increase in the effective tax rate. |
These variances were partially offset by the reduction of valuation allowances in certain
jurisdictions and other permanent differences.
We monitor the jurisdictions for which valuation allowances against deferred tax assets were
established in previous years, and we evaluate, on a quarterly basis, the need for the valuation
allowances against deferred tax assets in those jurisdictions. Such evaluation includes a review
of all available evidence, both positive and negative, in determining whether a valuation allowance
is necessary.
For statutory purposes, the majority of the U.S. federal tax benefits, against which valuation
allowances have been established, do not expire until fiscal year 2025 and beyond, based on current
tax laws.
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests:
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
Fiscal Quarters Ended |
$ | 3,790 | $ | 5,130 | $ | (1,340 | ) | (26.1 | )% | |||||||
Fiscal Six Months Ended |
$ | 7,096 | $ | 6,639 | $ | 457 | 6.9 | % |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests represents third-party ownership
interests in the results of our Global Power Groups Martinez, California gas-fired cogeneration
subsidiary and our manufacturing subsidiaries in Poland and the Peoples Republic of China as well
as our Global E&C Groups subsidiaries in Malaysia and South Africa. The change in net income
attributable to noncontrolling interests is based upon changes in the underlying earnings of these
subsidiaries and/or changes in the noncontrolling interests ownership interest in the
subsidiaries.
The decrease in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the fiscal second
quarter of 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, primarily resulted from our operations in
Malaysia and Poland, partially offset by our operations in Martinez, California.
The increase in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the fiscal six months
ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, primarily resulted from our operations in
Martinez, California and South Africa, partially offset by our operations in Malaysia and Poland.
45
Table of Contents
EBITDA:
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
Fiscal Quarters Ended |
$ | 90,239 | $ | 161,962 | $ | (71,723 | ) | (44.3 | )% | |||||||
Fiscal Six Months Ended |
$ | 201,519 | $ | 267,546 | $ | (66,027 | ) | (24.7 | )% |
EBITDA decreased in the fiscal second quarter of 2010, compared to the same period in
2009, primarily driven by decreased contract profit in both of our business groups. Please refer
to the preceding discussion within this Results of Operations section.
EBITDA decreased in the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in
2009, primarily driven by decreased contract profit in both of our business groups, partially
offset by a curtailment gain of $20,100 related to our U.K. pension plan that has been closed for
future benefit accrual. Please refer to the preceding discussion of each of these items within
this Results of Operations section.
See the individual segment explanations below for additional details.
EBITDA is a supplemental financial measure not defined in generally accepted accounting
principles, or GAAP. We define EBITDA as income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG before interest
expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. We have presented EBITDA because we believe
it is an important supplemental measure of operating performance. Certain covenants under our U.S.
senior secured credit agreement, as in effect as of June 30, 2010 and as amended and restated in
July 2010, use an adjusted form of EBITDA such that in the covenant calculations the EBITDA as
presented herein is adjusted for certain unusual and infrequent items specifically excluded in the
terms of our U.S. senior secured credit agreement. We believe that the line item on the
consolidated statement of operations entitled net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG is the
most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to EBITDA. Since EBITDA is not a measure of
performance calculated in accordance with GAAP, it should not be considered in isolation of, or as
a substitute for, net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG as an indicator of operating
performance or any other GAAP financial measure. EBITDA, as calculated by us, may not be
comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies. In addition, this measure
does not necessarily represent funds available for discretionary use and is not necessarily a
measure of our ability to fund our cash needs. As EBITDA excludes certain financial information
that is included in net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG, users of this financial
information should consider the type of events and transactions that are excluded. Our non-GAAP
performance measure, EBITDA, has certain material limitations as follows:
| It does not include interest expense. Because we have borrowed money to finance some of our operations, interest is a necessary and ongoing part of our costs and has assisted us in generating revenue. Therefore, any measure that excludes interest expense has material limitations; | ||
| It does not include taxes. Because the payment of taxes is a necessary and ongoing part of our operations, any measure that excludes taxes has material limitations; and | ||
| It does not include depreciation and amortization. Because we must utilize property, plant and equipment and intangible assets in order to generate revenues in our operations, depreciation and amortization are necessary and ongoing costs of our operations. Therefore, any measure that excludes depreciation and amortization has material limitations. |
46
Table of Contents
A reconciliation of EBITDA to net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG is shown below.
Global | Global | C&F | ||||||||||||||
Total | E&C Group | Power Group | Group(1) | |||||||||||||
Fiscal Quarter Ended June 30, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||
EBITDA (2) |
$ | 90,239 | $ | 85,460 | $ | 26,396 | $ | (21,617 | ) | |||||||
Less: Interest expense |
4,044 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Depreciation and amortization |
11,928 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Provision for income taxes |
15,409 | |||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG |
$ | 58,858 | ||||||||||||||
Fiscal Quarter Ended June 30, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||
EBITDA (3) |
$ | 161,962 | $ | 130,628 | $ | 53,780 | $ | (22,446 | ) | |||||||
Less: Interest expense |
1,302 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Depreciation and amortization |
10,895 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Provision for income taxes |
27,561 | |||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG |
$ | 122,204 | ||||||||||||||
Fiscal Six Months Ended June 30, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||
EBITDA (4) |
$ | 201,519 | $ | 185,393 | $ | 56,279 | $ | (40,153 | ) | |||||||
Less: Interest expense |
8,595 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Depreciation and amortization |
24,987 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Provision for income taxes |
37,019 | |||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG |
$ | 130,918 | ||||||||||||||
Fiscal Six Months Ended June 30, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||
EBITDA (5) |
$ | 267,546 | $ | 211,910 | $ | 102,563 | $ | (46,927 | ) | |||||||
Less: Interest expense |
5,469 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Depreciation and amortization |
21,446 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Provision for income taxes |
45,564 | |||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG |
$ | 195,067 | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Includes general corporate income and expense, our captive insurance operation and the elimination of transactions and balances related to intercompany interest. | |
(2) | Includes in the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010: increased contract profit of $8,600 from the regular revaluation of final estimated contract profit*: $8,100 in our Global E&C Group and $500 in our Global Power Group; and a net provision of $2,300 in our C&F Group on the revaluation of our asbestos liability and related asset**. | |
(3) | Includes in the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009: increased contract profit of $20,200 from the regular revaluation of final estimated contract profit*: $18,000 in our Global E&C Group and $2,200 in our Global Power Group; and a provision of $1,800 in our C&F Group on the revaluation of our asbestos liability and related asset**. | |
(4) | Includes in the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2010: increased contract profit of $33,700 from the regular revaluation of final estimated contract profit*: $25,200 in our Global E&C Group and $8,500 in our Global Power Group; a $20,100 curtailment gain in our Global E&C Group on the closure of the U.K. pension plan for future defined benefit accrual; and a net provision of $1,600 in our C&F Group on the revaluation of our asbestos liability and related asset**. | |
(5) | Includes in the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2009: increased contract profit of $26,200 from the regular revaluation of final estimated contract profit*: $24,500 in our Global E&C Group and $1,700 in our Global Power Group; and a provision of $3,500 in our C&F Group on the revaluation of our asbestos liability and related asset**. | |
* | Please refer to Revenue Recognition on Long-Term Contracts in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for further information regarding changes in our final estimated contract profit. | |
** | Please refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for |
47
Table of Contents
further information regarding the revaluation of our asbestos liability and related asset. |
The accounting policies of our business segments are the same as those described in our
summary of significant accounting policies. The only significant intersegment transactions relate
to interest on intercompany balances. We account for interest on those arrangements as if they
were third-party transactionsi.e. at current market rates, and we include the elimination of that
activity in the results of the C&F Group.
Business Segments
EBITDA, as discussed and defined above, is the primary measure of operating performance used
by our chief operating decision maker.
Global E&C Group
Fiscal Quarters Ended | Fiscal Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | $ Change | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | 842,461 | $ | 1,030,471 | $ | (188,010 | ) | (18.2 | )% | $ | 1,622,145 | $ | 1,982,883 | $ | (360,738 | ) | (18.2 | )% | ||||||||||||||
EBITDA |
$ | 85,460 | $ | 130,628 | $ | (45,168 | ) | (34.6 | )% | $ | 185,393 | $ | 211,910 | $ | (26,517 | ) | (12.5 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Results
The geographic dispersion of our Global E&C Groups operating revenues for the fiscal quarters
and six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 based upon where our projects are being
executed, were as follows:
Fiscal Quarters Ended | Fiscal Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | $ Change | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
$ | 172,137 | $ | 413,434 | $ | (241,297 | ) | (58.4 | )% | $ | 359,408 | $ | 780,396 | $ | (420,988 | ) | (53.9 | )% | |||||||||||||||||
Australasia and other* |
307,799 | 264,921 | 42,878 | 16.2 | % | 595,396 | 512,401 | 82,995 | 16.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
164,955 | 153,198 | 11,757 | 7.7 | % | 306,762 | 306,038 | 724 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Middle East |
50,654 | 110,164 | (59,510 | ) | (54.0 | )% | 121,194 | 218,006 | (96,812 | ) | (44.4 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
94,315 | 59,691 | 34,624 | 58.0 | % | 153,861 | 118,349 | 35,512 | 30.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
South America |
52,601 | 29,063 | 23,538 | 81.0 | % | 85,524 | 47,693 | 37,831 | 79.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 842,461 | $ | 1,030,471 | $ | (188,010 | ) | (18.2 | )% | $ | 1,622,145 | $ | 1,982,883 | $ | (360,738 | ) | (18.2 | )% | |||||||||||||||||
* | Australasia and other primarily represents Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands. |
Our Global E&C Group experienced decreases in operating revenues of 18% in both the
fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods in 2009, which
include the impact of decreased flow-through revenues in both periods. Excluding flow-through
revenues, our Global E&C Groups operating revenues decreased 6% in both the fiscal quarter and six
months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods in 2009. The decrease in the fiscal
second quarter of 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, resulted from foreign currency
fluctuations relative to the U.S. dollar, primarily driven by the British pound and Euro, and a
decline in volume of business. The decrease in the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2010, compared
to the same period in 2009, resulted from a decline in volume of business, while foreign currency
fluctuations had a relatively minimal impact. Please refer to the Overview of Segment section
below for a discussion of our Global E&C Groups market outlook.
The decrease in our Global E&C Groups EBITDA in the fiscal second quarter of 2010, compared
to the same period in 2009, resulted primarily from the impact of the following:
| Decreased contract profit of $40,500, primarily as a result of decreased contract profit margins. | ||
| Increased net foreign exchange transaction losses of $2,500, which resulted primarily from the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on cash balances that were denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of our subsidiaries that held these cash balances. | ||
| A decrease in equity earnings in our Global E&C Groups projects in Italy of $2,300. |
48
Table of Contents
The decrease in our Global E&C Groups EBITDA in the fiscal six months ended June 30, 2010,
compared to the same period in 2009, resulted primarily from the net impact of the following:
| Decreased contract profit of $38,600, primarily as a result of decreased contract profit margins and, to a lesser extent, volume decrease in operating revenues. | ||
| Increased net foreign exchange transaction losses of $7,600, which resulted primarily from the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on cash balances that were denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of our subsidiaries that held these cash balances. | ||
| A decrease in equity earnings in our Global E&C Groups projects in Italy of $1,300. |
The decrease in EBITDA was partially offset by a curtailment gain of $20,100 related to our
U.K. pension plan that has been closed for future benefit accrual, which was included in contract
profit.
Overview of Segment
Our Global E&C Group, which operates worldwide, designs, engineers and constructs onshore and
offshore upstream oil and gas processing facilities, natural gas liquefaction facilities and
receiving terminals, gas-to-liquids facilities, oil refining, chemical and petrochemical,
pharmaceutical and biotechnology facilities and related infrastructure, including power generation
and distribution facilities, and gasification facilities. Our Global E&C Group is also involved in
the design of facilities in new or developing market sectors, including carbon capture and storage,
solid fuel-fired integrated gasification combined-cycle power plants, coal-to-liquids,
coal-to-chemicals and biofuels. Our Global E&C Group generates revenues from design, engineering,
procurement, construction and project management activities pursuant to contracts spanning up to
approximately four years in duration and from returns on its equity investments in various power
production facilities.
Our Global E&C Group owns one of the leading technologies (SYDECSM delayed coking)
used in refinery residue upgrading, in addition to other refinery residue upgrading technologies
(solvent deasphalting and visbreaking), and a hydrogen production process used in oil refineries
and petrochemical plants. The Global E&C Group also designs and supplies direct-fired furnaces,
including fired heaters and waste heat recovery generators, used in a range of refinery, chemical,
petrochemical, oil and gas processes, including furnaces used in its proprietary delayed coking and
hydrogen production technologies. Additionally, our Global E&C Group has experience with, and is
able to work with, a wide range of processes owned by others.
Although the global economy is showing signs of recovery, several of our clients are
continuing to reevaluate the size, timing and scope of their capital spending plans in relation to
the kinds of energy, petrochemical and pharmaceuticals projects that we execute. We have seen
instances of postponement or cancellation of prospects; clients releasing us to proceed on projects
in phases; conducting further analysis before deciding to proceed with their investments; resizing,
reconfiguring or relocating of prospective projects to make them more economically viable and
intensified competition among engineering and construction contractors which has resulted in
pricing pressure. These factors may continue in the second half of fiscal year 2010. However, we
continue to see projects moving forward and clients starting to re-examine previously postponed
projects to review the business cases for proceeding with such projects. In addition, we believe
world demand for energy and chemicals will continue to grow over the long term and that clients
will continue to invest in new and upgraded capacity to meet that demand. We have noted signs of
market improvement. Moreover, we have continued to be successful in booking contracts of varying
types and sizes in our key end markets, including the award of a feasibility study and front-end
engineering contract for a new refinery in Iraq, an engineering, procurement and construction
management contract in Cameroon for a refinery upgrade and modernization, and project management
contracts for the development of two oilfields in the United Arab Emirates. Our success in this
regard is a reflection of our technical expertise, our long-term relationships with clients, and
our selective approach in pursuit of new prospects where we believe we have significant
differentiators.
49
Table of Contents
Global Power Group
Fiscal Quarters Ended | Fiscal Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | $ Change | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | 163,035 | $ | 278,330 | $ | (115,295 | ) | (41.4 | )% | $ | 328,924 | $ | 590,441 | $ | (261,517 | ) | (44.3 | )% | ||||||||||||||
EBITDA |
$ | 26,396 | $ | 53,780 | $ | (27,384 | ) | (50.9 | )% | $ | 56,279 | $ | 102,563 | $ | (46,284 | ) | (45.1 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Results
The geographic dispersion of our Global Power Groups operating revenues for the fiscal
quarters and six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 based upon where our projects are
being executed, were as follows:
Fiscal Quarters Ended | Fiscal Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | $ Change | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
$ | 36,447 | $ | 25,668 | $ | 10,779 | 42.0 | % | $ | 61,807 | $ | 50,486 | $ | 11,321 | 22.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Australasia and other* |
651 | 1,650 | (999 | ) | (60.5 | )% | 1,094 | 3,537 | (2,443 | ) | (69.1 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
58,484 | 133,247 | (74,763 | ) | (56.1 | )% | 116,587 | 271,822 | (155,235 | ) | (57.1 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Middle East |
861 | | 861 | N/M | 4,244 | | 4,244 | N/M | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
55,953 | 98,070 | (42,117 | ) | (42.9 | )% | 123,048 | 209,397 | (86,349 | ) | (41.2 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
South America |
10,639 | 19,695 | (9,056 | ) | (46.0 | )% | 22,144 | 55,199 | (33,055 | ) | (59.9 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 163,035 | $ | 278,330 | $ | (115,295 | ) | (41.4 | )% | $ | 328,924 | $ | 590,441 | $ | (261,517 | ) | (44.3 | )% | ||||||||||||||
* | Australasia and other primarily represents Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands. | |
N/M not meaningful. |
Our Global Power Group experienced decreases in operating revenues of 41% and 44%,
respectively, in the fiscal quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same
periods in 2009, which was the result of decreased volume of business. Please refer to the
"Overview of Segment section below for a discussion of our Global Power Groups market outlook.
The decrease in our Global Power Groups EBITDA in the fiscal second quarter of 2010, compared
to the same period in 2009, resulted primarily from the net impact of the following:
| Decreased contract profit of $26,300, primarily as a result of the volume decrease in operating revenues, partially offset by increased contract profit margins. | ||
| A decrease in equity earnings in our Global Power Groups project in Chile of $4,000, which was primarily due to the suspension of normal operating activities by the project as a result of an earthquake which occurred on February 27, 2010 off the coast of Chile. We have not recorded equity earnings in the Chile based project since the earthquake, as the operational costs incurred by the project are offset by the same estimated recovery under the property damage and business interruption insurance policies. Please refer to the Liquidity and Capital Resources-Outlook section within this Item 2 for further discussion of the damage and timing of the recognition of expected insurance recoveries. |
The decrease in our Global Power Groups EBITDA in the fiscal first six months of 2010,
compared to the same period in 2009, resulted primarily from the net impact of the following:
| Decreased contract profit of $43,600, primarily as a result of the volume decrease in operating revenues, partially offset by increased contract profit margins. | ||
| A decrease in equity earnings in our Global Power Groups project in Chile of $5,000, which was primarily due to the suspension of normal operating activities by the project as a result of an earthquake which occurred on February 27, 2010 off the coast of Chile. We have not recorded equity earnings in the Chile based project since the earthquake, as the operational costs incurred by the project are offset by the same estimated recovery under the property damage and business interruption insurance policies. Please refer to the Liquidity and Capital Resources-Outlook section within this Item 2 for further discussion of the damage and timing of the recognition of expected insurance recoveries. |
50
Table of Contents
Overview of Segment
Our Global Power Group designs, manufactures and erects steam generators and auxiliary
equipment for electric power generating stations, district heating and power plants and industrial
facilities worldwide. Our competitive differentiation in serving these markets is the ability of
our products to cleanly and efficiently burn a wide range of fuels, singularly or in combination.
In particular, our CFB steam generators are able to burn coals of varying quality, as well as
petroleum coke, lignite, municipal waste, waste wood, biomass, and numerous other materials. Among
these fuel sources, coal is the most widely used, and thus the market drivers and constraints
associated with coal strongly affect the steam generator market and our Global Power Groups
business. Additionally, our Global Power Group owns and/or operates several cogeneration,
independent power production and waste-to-energy facilities, as well as power generation facilities
for the process and petrochemical industries.
In our Global Power Group business, new order activity has been unfavorably affected by
several trends which began in fiscal year 2008 and which may continue in the future.
Weakness in the global economy has reduced the near-term growth in demand for electricity and
steam for industrial production processes. In addition, political and environmental sensitivity
regarding coal-fired steam generators caused a number of our Global Power Groups prospective
projects to be postponed or cancelled as clients experienced difficulty in obtaining the required
environmental permits or decided to wait for additional clarity regarding state and federal
regulations. This environmental concern has been especially pronounced in the U.S. and Western
Europe, and is linked to the view that solid-fuel-fired steam generators contribute to global
warming through the discharge of greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere. In addition, the
depressed level of natural gas pricing experienced in fiscal years 2009 and 2010, increased the
attractiveness of that fuel, in relation to coal, for the generation of electricity. Finally, the
constraints on the global credit market are impacting and may continue to impact some of our
clients investment plans as these clients are affected by the availability and cost of financing,
as well as their own financial strategies, which could include cash conservation. We believe that
demand for new solid-fuel steam generators will improve in the second half of fiscal year 2010
driven primarily by growing electricity demand and industrial production as economies around the
world recover from the recent global economic downturn. We are now seeing increased demand for our
products in Asia and Eastern Europe as evidenced by increased proposal activity. However, the
significant reduction of new contract awards in fiscal year 2009 has and is likely to continue to
impact our financial performance in fiscal year 2010.
Longer-term, we believe that world demand for electrical energy will continue to grow and that
solid-fuel-fired steam generators will continue to fill a significant portion of the incremental
growth in new generating capacity. In addition, we are seeing a growing need to repower older coal
plants with new clean coal plants driven by the need to improve environmental, economical, and
reliability performance of mature coal plant fleets in the U.S., Europe and Russia. The
fuel-flexibility of our CFB steam generators enables them to burn a variety of fuels other than
coal and to produce carbon-neutral electricity when fired by biomass. In addition, our utility
steam generators can be designed to incorporate supercritical steam technology, which significantly
improves power plant efficiency and reduces power plant emissions.
We have recently received an award to carry out the detailed engineering and supply of a
pilot-scale (approximately 30 MWth) CFB steam generator, which incorporates our carbon-capturing
Flexi-BurnTM technology. Once operational, this pilot facility will be utilized to
validate the design of a full-scale carbon-capturing CFB power plant. Further, we have recently
signed, together with other parties, a grant agreement with the European Commission, or EC, to
support the technology development of a commercial scale (approximately 300 MWe) Carbon Capture and
Storage, or CCS, demonstration plant featuring our Flexi-BurnTM CFB technology. If the
technology development work demonstrates that the project meets its specified technology and
investment goals, construction of the commercial scale demonstration plant could begin in 2012 and
the plant could be operational by 2015. This project is one of the six European based CCS projects
selected for funding by the EC under the European Energy Program for Recovery and it is the only
selected project utilizing CFB technology for CCS application.
51
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Fiscal First Six Months of 2010 Activities
Our cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash balances were:
As of | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 973,913 | $ | 997,158 | $ | (23,245 | ) | (2.3 | )% | |||||||
Short-term investments |
240 | | 240 | N/M | ||||||||||||
Restricted cash |
28,189 | 34,905 | (6,716 | ) | (19.2 | )% | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,002,342 | $ | 1,032,063 | $ | (29,721 | ) | (2.9 | )% | |||||||
N/M not meaningful. |
Total cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash held by our
non-U.S. entities as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were $802,800 and $806,800,
respectively.
During the fiscal first six months of 2010 we experienced a decrease in cash and cash
equivalents of $23,200, primarily as a result of a $57,900 decrease due to exchange rate changes,
$9,400 of capital expenditures, $7,700 net repayment of debt and capital lease obligations and
$7,300 of distributions to noncontrolling interests, partially offset by $51,300 of cash provided
by operating activities, $3,300 change in restricted cash and a $3,200 return of investment from
unconsolidated affiliates.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Fiscal Six Months Ended | ||||||
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | $ Change | % Change | |||
$51,325
|
$93,954 | $(42,629) | (45.4)% |
Net cash provided by operating activities in the fiscal first six months of 2010
primarily resulted from cash provided by net income of $138,000, which includes non-cash charges of
$41,100, partially offset by cash used for working capital of $88,700, mandatory and discretionary
contributions to our pension plans of $29,200, which included discretionary contributions of
$17,800, and net asbestos-related payments of $6,600 (please refer to Note 12 to the consolidated
financial statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for further information on net
asbestos-related payments).
Net cash provided by operating activities in the first fiscal six months of 2009 was primarily
from net income of $201,700, which includes non-cash charges of $40,700, partially offset by cash
used for working capital needs of $125,500, net payments for asbestos liability and defense costs
in excess of proceeds from settlements with asbestos insurance carriers of $17,200, and mandatory
contributions to our non-U.S. pension plans of $12,700.
The decrease in cash provided by operating activities of $42,600 in the fiscal first six
months of 2010, compared to the same period of 2009, resulted primarily from decreased net income
of $63,700, increased contributions to our pension plans of $16,500, primarily from discretionary
contributions in fiscal year 2010 as noted above, partially offset by a decrease in cash used for
working capital of $36,800.
Cash used for working capital was $88,700 and $125,500 in the fiscal first six months of 2010
and 2009, respectively. Working capital varies from period to period depending on the mix, stage
of completion and commercial terms and conditions of our contracts and the timing of the related
cash receipts. We experienced a decrease in cash used for working capital during the fiscal first
six months of 2010, compared to the same period of 2009, as cash receipts from client billings
increased relative to cash used for services rendered and purchases of materials and equipment.
The decrease in cash used for working capital during the fiscal first six months of 2010 was driven
by cash generated by our Global Power Group, partially offset by an increase in cash used by our
Global E&C Group.
52
Table of Contents
As more fully described below in Outlook, we believe our existing cash balances and
forecasted net cash provided from operating activities will be sufficient to fund our operations
throughout the next 12 months. Our ability to increase or maintain our cash flows from operating
activities in future periods will depend in large part on the demand for our products and services
and our operating performance in the future. Please refer to the sections entitled Global E&C
Group-Overview of Segment and Global Power Group-Overview of Segment above for our view of the
outlook for each of our business segments.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Fiscal Six Months Ended | ||||||
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | $ Change | % Change | |||
$(4,248) | $(39,215) | $34,967 | (89.2)% |
The net cash used in investing activities in the fiscal first six months of 2010 was
attributable primarily to capital expenditures of $9,400 and a contractual payment of $1,200
related to a prior acquisition of a business, partially offset by cash provided by a decrease in
restricted cash of $3,300 and return of investment from unconsolidated affiliates of $3,200.
The net cash used in investing activities in the fiscal first six months of 2009 was primarily
from capital expenditures of $26,700, which included $11,300 of expenditures in FW Power S.r.l. as
we continued construction of the electric power generating wind farm projects in Italy, the $8,900
purchase price paid for substantially all of the assets of the offshore engineering division of OPE
and an increase in restricted cash of $2,800 driven by an increase in the balance required for
collateralized standby letters of credit, bank guarantees and surety bonds.
The capital expenditures in the fiscal first six months of 2010 and 2009 related primarily to
project construction (including the fiscal year 2009 wind farm project expenditures in FW Power
S.r.l., noted above), leasehold improvements, information technology equipment and office
equipment. Our capital expenditures decreased $17,300 in the fiscal first six months of 2010,
compared to the same period of 2009, as a result of decreased expenditures in both our Global E&C
Group and Global Power Group.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Fiscal Six Months Ended | ||||||
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | $ Change | % Change | |||
$(12,383) | $(3,833) | $(8,550) | 223.1% |
The net cash used in financing activities in the fiscal first six months of 2010 was
attributable primarily to the repayment of short-term and long-term project debt and capital lease
obligations of $9,900 and distributions to noncontrolling interests of $7,300, partially offset by
cash provided from exercises of stock options of $2,600 and proceeds from the issuance of new
short-term debt of $2,200.
The net cash used in financing activities in the fiscal first six months of 2009 was
attributable primarily to the repayment of debt and capital lease obligations of $8,700, partially
offset by proceeds from the issuance of debt of $4,800.
53
Table of Contents
Outlook
Our liquidity forecasts cover, among other analyses, existing cash balances, cash flows from
operations, cash repatriations from non-U.S. entities, changes in working capital activities,
unused credit line availability and claim recoveries and proceeds from asset sales, if any. These
forecasts extend over a rolling 12-month period. Based on these forecasts, we believe our existing
cash balances and forecasted net cash provided by operating activities will be sufficient to fund
our operations throughout the next 12 months. Based on these forecasts, our primary cash needs
will be working capital, capital expenditures, asbestos liability indemnity and defense costs and
acquisitions. We may also use cash to repurchase shares under our share repurchase program, as
described further below, under which we are authorized to repurchase up to $264,773 of our
outstanding shares. The majority of our cash balances are invested in short-term interest bearing
accounts with maturities of less than three months. We continue to consider investing some of our
cash in longer-term investment opportunities, including the acquisition of other entities or
operations in the engineering and construction industry or power industry and/or the reduction of
certain liabilities such as unfunded pension liabilities. We may elect to make additional
discretionary contributions to our U.S. and/or U.K. pension plans during fiscal year 2010.
It is customary in the industries in which we operate to provide standby letters of credit,
bank guarantees or performance bonds in favor of clients to secure obligations under contracts. We
believe that we will have sufficient letter of credit capacity from existing facilities throughout
the next 12 months.
Our U.S. operating entities do not generate sufficient cash flows to fund our obligations
related to corporate overhead expenses and asbestos-related liabilities incurred in the U.S.
Additionally, we are dependent on cash repatriations to cover essentially all payments and expenses
of our Switzerland based corporate overhead expenses and to fund the acquisition of our shares
under our share repurchase program described below. Consequently, we require cash repatriations to
the U.S. and Switzerland from our entities located in other countries in the normal course of our
operations to meet our Swiss and U.S. cash needs and have successfully repatriated cash for many
years. We believe that we can repatriate the required amount of cash to the U.S. and Switzerland.
Additionally, we continue to have access to the revolving credit portion of our U.S. senior secured
credit facility, if needed.
During the fiscal first six months of 2010, we had net cash outflows of approximately $6,600,
resulting from asbestos liability indemnity and defense costs payments in excess of insurance
settlement proceeds. We expect to have net cash inflows of $7,900 as a result of insurance
settlement proceeds in excess of the asbestos liability indemnity and defense costs for the full
fiscal year 2010. This estimate assumes no additional settlements with insurance companies or
elections by us to fund additional payments. As we continue to collect cash from insurance
settlements and assuming no increase in our asbestos-related insurance liability or any future
insurance settlements, the asbestos-related insurance receivable recorded on our balance sheet will
continue to decrease.
On July 30, 2010, Foster Wheeler AG, Foster Wheeler Ltd., certain of Foster Wheeler Ltd.s
subsidiaries and BNP Paribas, as Administrative Agent, entered into a four-year amendment and
restatement of our U.S. senior secured credit agreement, which we entered into in October 2006.
The amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement provides for a facility of $450,000,
and includes a provision which permits future incremental increases of up to $225,000 in total
availability under the facility. The amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement
permits us to issue up to $450,000 under the letter of credit facility. Letters of credit issued
under the amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement have performance pricing that
is decreased (or increased) as a result of improvements (or reductions) in our corporate credit
rating as reported by Moodys Investors Service (Moodys) and/or Standard & Poors (S&P). Based
on the current ratings, the letter of credit fees for performance and financial letters of credit
issued under the amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement are 1.125% and 2.25% per
annum of the outstanding amount, respectively, excluding a nominal fronting fee. This performance
pricing is not expected to materially impact our liquidity or capital resources in fiscal year
2010. We also have the option to use up to $100,000 of the $450,000 for revolving borrowings at a
rate equal to adjusted LIBOR, as defined in the agreement, plus 2.25%, subject also to the
performance pricing noted above.
The assets and/or stock of certain of our U.S. and non-U.S. subsidiaries collateralize our
obligations under our amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement. In the event that
our corporate credit rating as issued by Moodys is at least Baa3 and as issued by S&P is at least
BBB-, all liens securing our obligations under the amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit
agreement will be automatically released and terminated.
We had approximately $284,700 and $308,000 of letters of credit outstanding under our U.S.
senior secured credit agreement in effect as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
There were no funded
54
Table of Contents
borrowings under our U.S. senior secured credit agreement in effect as of June 30, 2010 or
December 31, 2009. We do not intend to borrow under our U.S. senior secured credit facility during
fiscal year 2010. Please refer to Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements in this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for further information regarding our debt obligations.
On February 27, 2010, an earthquake occurred off the coast of Chile that caused significant
damage to the refinery/electric power generation project in which we hold an 85% noncontrolling
interest. The projects facility suspended normal operating activities from that date. We do not
yet have a complete assessment of the extent of the damage or an estimate of the required cost of
repairs. However, we believe the property damage insurance coverage in effect will be sufficient
to cover the estimated costs of repairing the facility and to substantially compensate the project
for the loss of profits while the facility has suspended operations until such time as normal
operating activities can resume. Please refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for further information on our equity interest in this project.
We are not required to make any mandatory contributions to our U.S. pension plans in fiscal
year 2010 based on the minimum statutory funding requirements. We made mandatory and discretionary
contributions totaling approximately $29,200 to our pension plans, which included discretionary
contributions totaling approximately $17,800 to our U.S. and U.K. pension plans, during the fiscal
six months ended June 30, 2010. Based on the minimum statutory funding requirements for fiscal
year 2010, we expect to make mandatory and discretionary contributions totaling approximately
$39,000 to our U.S. and non-U.S. pension plans. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and
the Health Care and Education and Reconciliation Act were signed into law in the U.S. in March
2010. The law includes a significant number of health-related provisions, most of which will take
effect beginning in 2011 or later. At this time we do not expect that the law will have a
significant impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
On September 12, 2008, we announced a share repurchase program pursuant to which our Board of
Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $750,000 of our outstanding shares and the designation
of the repurchased shares for cancellation. Based on the aggregate share repurchases under our
program through June 30, 2010, we are authorized to repurchase up to $264,773 of our outstanding
shares. Any repurchases will be made at our discretion in the open market or in privately
negotiated transactions in compliance with applicable securities laws and other legal requirements
and will depend on a variety of factors, including market conditions, share price and other
factors. The program does not obligate us to acquire any particular number of shares. The
program has no expiration date and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. Any repurchases
made pursuant to the share repurchase program will be funded using our cash on hand. Cumulatively
through August 5, 2010, we have repurchased 18,098,519 shares for an aggregate cost of
approximately $485,600 (which includes commissions of $400). We have executed the repurchases in
accordance with 10b5-1 repurchase plans as well as other open market purchases. The 10b5-1
repurchase plans allow us to purchase shares at times when we may not otherwise do so due to
regulatory or internal restrictions. Purchases under the 10b5-1 repurchase plans are based on
parameters set forth in the plans.
We have not declared or paid a cash dividend since July 2001 and we do not have any plans to
declare or pay any cash dividends. Our U.S. senior secured credit agreement, as in effect as of
June 30, 2010 and as amended and restated in July 2010, contains limitations on cash dividend
payments as well as other restricted payments.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We own several noncontrolling interests in power projects in Chile and Italy. Certain of the
projects have third-party debt that is not consolidated in our balance sheet. We have also issued
certain guarantees for the Chile based project. Please refer to Note 3 to the consolidated
financial statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for further information related to these
projects.
Backlog and New Orders
New orders are recorded and added to the backlog of unfilled orders based on signed
contracts as well as agreed letters of intent, which we have determined are legally binding and
likely to proceed. Although backlog represents only business that is considered likely to be
performed, cancellations or scope adjustments may and do occur. The elapsed time from the award of
a contract to completion of performance may be up to approximately four years. The
dollar amount of backlog is not necessarily indicative of our future earnings related to the
performance of such work due to factors outside our control, such as changes in project schedules,
scope adjustments or project cancellations. We cannot predict with certainty the portion of
backlog to be performed in a
55
Table of Contents
given year. Backlog is adjusted quarterly to reflect new orders, project cancellations,
deferrals, revised project scope and cost and sales of subsidiaries, if any.
Backlog measured in Foster Wheeler scope reflects the dollar value of backlog excluding
third-party costs incurred by us on a reimbursable basis as agent or principal, which we refer to
as flow-through costs. Foster Wheeler scope measures the component of backlog with profit
potential and corresponds to our services plus fees for reimbursable contracts and total selling
price for fixed-price or lump-sum contracts.
New Orders, Measured in Terms of Future Revenues
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Global | Global | Global | Global | |||||||||||||||||||||
E&C Group | Power Group | Total | E&C Group | Power Group | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
By Project Location: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Quarters Ended |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 229,600 | $ | 33,500 | $ | 263,100 | $ | 367,000 | $ | 43,400 | $ | 410,400 | ||||||||||||
South America |
26,700 | 5,000 | 31,700 | 40,700 | 5,200 | 45,900 | ||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
139,900 | 79,400 | 219,300 | 165,900 | 29,800 | 195,700 | ||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
159,500 | 46,000 | 205,500 | 174,700 | 7,600 | 182,300 | ||||||||||||||||||
Middle East |
106,200 | 300 | 106,500 | 40,400 | | 40,400 | ||||||||||||||||||
Australasia and other* |
108,900 | 600 | 109,500 | 59,000 | 100 | 59,100 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 770,800 | $ | 164,800 | $ | 935,600 | $ | 847,700 | $ | 86,100 | $ | 933,800 | ||||||||||||
Fiscal Six Months Ended |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 290,500 | $ | 104,200 | $ | 394,700 | $ | 449,400 | $ | 83,300 | $ | 532,700 | ||||||||||||
South America |
52,800 | 8,000 | 60,800 | 50,300 | 7,500 | 57,800 | ||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
227,300 | 416,200 | 643,500 | 249,700 | 71,900 | 321,600 | ||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
249,900 | 96,600 | 346,500 | 689,100 | 19,600 | 708,700 | ||||||||||||||||||
Middle East |
161,500 | 300 | 161,800 | 89,500 | | 89,500 | ||||||||||||||||||
Australasia and other* |
265,100 | 1,700 | 266,800 | 129,200 | 300 | 129,500 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,247,100 | $ | 627,000 | $ | 1,874,100 | $ | 1,657,200 | $ | 182,600 | $ | 1,839,800 | ||||||||||||
By Industry: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Quarters Ended |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power generation |
$ | 16,700 | $ | 138,000 | $ | 154,700 | $ | 3,000 | $ | 58,300 | $ | 61,300 | ||||||||||||
Oil refining |
499,600 | | 499,600 | 505,000 | | 505,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical |
21,900 | | 21,900 | 16,400 | | 16,400 | ||||||||||||||||||
Oil and gas |
90,300 | | 90,300 | 100,700 | | 100,700 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chemical/petrochemical |
128,000 | | 128,000 | 213,100 | | 213,100 | ||||||||||||||||||
Power plant operation
and maintenance |
| 26,800 | 26,800 | | 27,800 | 27,800 | ||||||||||||||||||
Environmental |
3,200 | | 3,200 | 800 | | 800 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other, net of eliminations |
11,100 | | 11,100 | 8,700 | | 8,700 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 770,800 | $ | 164,800 | $ | 935,600 | $ | 847,700 | $ | 86,100 | $ | 933,800 | ||||||||||||
Fiscal Six Months Ended |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power generation |
$ | 24,000 | $ | 575,800 | $ | 599,800 | $ | 17,500 | $ | 140,900 | $ | 158,400 | ||||||||||||
Oil refining |
708,300 | | 708,300 | 1,048,100 | | 1,048,100 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical |
31,900 | | 31,900 | 34,200 | | 34,200 | ||||||||||||||||||
Oil and gas |
176,300 | | 176,300 | 241,900 | | 241,900 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chemical/petrochemical |
281,000 | | 281,000 | 313,600 | | 313,600 | ||||||||||||||||||
Power plant operation
and maintenance |
| 51,200 | 51,200 | | 41,700 | 41,700 | ||||||||||||||||||
Environmental |
9,500 | | 9,500 | 4,700 | | 4,700 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other, net of eliminations |
16,100 | | 16,100 | (2,800 | ) | | (2,800 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,247,100 | $ | 627,000 | $ | 1,874,100 | $ | 1,657,200 | $ | 182,600 | $ | 1,839,800 | ||||||||||||
* | Australasia and other primarily represents Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands. |
56
Table of Contents
Backlog, Measured in Terms of Future Revenues
As of June 30, 2010 | As of December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Global | Global | Global | Global | |||||||||||||||||||||
E&C Group | Power Group | Total | E&C Group | Power Group | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
By Contract Type: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lump-sum turnkey |
$ | | $ | 382,400 | $ | 382,400 | $ | 100 | $ | 169,300 | $ | 169,400 | ||||||||||||
Other fixed-price |
346,800 | 380,300 | 727,100 | 215,800 | 306,300 | 522,100 | ||||||||||||||||||
Reimbursable |
2,558,900 | 47,400 | 2,606,300 | 3,297,700 | 128,700 | 3,426,400 | ||||||||||||||||||
Eliminations |
900 | (3,400 | ) | (2,500 | ) | (900 | ) | (4,200 | ) | (5,100 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,906,600 | $ | 806,700 | $ | 3,713,300 | $ | 3,512,700 | $ | 600,100 | $ | 4,112,800 | ||||||||||||
By Project Location: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 606,500 | $ | 179,500 | $ | 786,000 | $ | 472,700 | $ | 198,900 | $ | 671,600 | ||||||||||||
South America |
148,200 | 35,100 | 183,300 | 185,300 | 52,700 | 238,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
292,200 | 452,800 | 745,000 | 432,800 | 228,500 | 661,300 | ||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
580,200 | 120,200 | 700,400 | 728,400 | 93,200 | 821,600 | ||||||||||||||||||
Middle East |
193,100 | 19,200 | 212,300 | 226,000 | 27,800 | 253,800 | ||||||||||||||||||
Australasia and other* |
1,086,400 | (100 | ) | 1,086,300 | 1,467,500 | (1,000 | ) | 1,466,500 | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,906,600 | $ | 806,700 | $ | 3,713,300 | $ | 3,512,700 | $ | 600,100 | $ | 4,112,800 | ||||||||||||
By Industry: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power generation |
$ | 17,700 | $ | 688,700 | $ | 706,400 | $ | 18,900 | $ | 482,100 | $ | 501,000 | ||||||||||||
Oil refining |
1,521,400 | | 1,521,400 | 1,597,900 | | 1,597,900 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical |
24,300 | | 24,300 | 21,300 | | 21,300 | ||||||||||||||||||
Oil and gas |
1,008,900 | | 1,008,900 | 1,559,400 | | 1,559,400 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chemical/petrochemical |
311,500 | | 311,500 | 299,800 | | 299,800 | ||||||||||||||||||
Power plant operation
and maintenance |
| 118,000 | 118,000 | | 118,000 | 118,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Environmental |
9,900 | | 9,900 | 8,200 | | 8,200 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other, net of eliminations |
12,900 | | 12,900 | 7,200 | | 7,200 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,906,600 | $ | 806,700 | $ | 3,713,300 | $ | 3,512,700 | $ | 600,100 | $ | 4,112,800 | ||||||||||||
Backlog, measured in terms
of Foster Wheeler Scope |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,434,800 | $ | 795,000 | $ | 2,229,800 | $ | 1,480,100 | $ | 588,500 | $ | 2,068,600 | ||||||||||||
E & C Man-hours in Backlog
(in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
14,100 | 14,100 | 12,700 | 12,700 | ||||||||||||||||||||
* | Australasia and other primarily represents Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands. |
The foreign currency translation impact on backlog and Foster Wheeler scope backlog resulted
in decreases of $299,700 and $218,700, respectively, as of June 30, 2010 compared to December 31,
2009.
Inflation
The effect of inflation on our financial results is minimal. Although a majority of our
revenues are realized under long-term contracts, the selling prices of such contracts, established
for deliveries in the future, generally reflect estimated costs to complete the projects in these
future periods. In addition, many of our projects are reimbursable at actual cost plus a fee,
while some of the fixed-price contracts provide for price adjustments through escalation clauses.
Application of Critical Accounting Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Management and the Audit Committee of our
Board of Directors approve the critical accounting policies.
A full discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates is included in our 2009
Form 10-K. We did not have a significant change to the application of our critical accounting
policies and estimates during the fiscal first six months of 2010.
57
Table of Contents
Accounting Developments
In July 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard
Update (ASU) No. 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the
Allowance for Credit Losses. This ASU requires specific disclosures related to the credit quality
of an entitys financing receivables and its allowance for credit losses. Financing receivable is
defined in the ASU as a contractual right to receive money on demand or on fixed or determinable
dates that is recognized as an asset in the entitys statement of financial position. New
disclosures are required for finance receivables and the related allowance for credit losses on a
disaggregated basis, which the standard defines as portfolio segment and class of financing
receivable. ASU No. 2010-20 is effective for financial statements issued for interim or annual
periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. We will amend our disclosures accordingly beginning
with our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal
year 2010.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
During the fiscal first six months of 2010, there were no material changes in the market risks
as described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to
be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the Exchange Act), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include,
without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that the information required to be
disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers,
or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we
recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide
only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and we necessarily are
required to apply our judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and
procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, our chief executive officer and our chief
financial officer carried out an evaluation, with the participation of our Disclosure Committee and
management, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and our chief
financial officer concluded, at the reasonable assurance level, that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting in the fiscal three
months ended June 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
58
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Please refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements in this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for a discussion of legal proceedings, which is incorporated by reference in this Part
II.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Information regarding our risk factors appears in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in our
annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, which we filed with the SEC
on February 25, 2010. There have been no material changes in those risk factors.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(c) Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers (amounts in
thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts).
On September 12, 2008, we announced a share repurchase program pursuant to which our Board of
Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $750,000 of our outstanding shares and the designation
of the repurchased shares for cancellation. Based on the aggregate share repurchases under our
program through June 30, 2010, we are authorized to repurchase up to $264,773 of our outstanding
shares. As noted in the table below, there were no purchases under our share repurchase program
during the fiscal second quarter of 2010.
Total Number | Approximate | |||||||||||||||
of Shares | Dollar Value | |||||||||||||||
Purchased as | of Shares that | |||||||||||||||
Part of | May Yet Be | |||||||||||||||
Average | Publicly | Purchased | ||||||||||||||
Total Number | Price | Announced | Under the | |||||||||||||
of Shares | Paid per | Plans | Plans or | |||||||||||||
Fiscal Month | Purchased(1) | Share | or Programs | Programs | ||||||||||||
April 1, 2010 through April 30, 2010 |
| $ | | | ||||||||||||
May 1, 2010 through May 31, 2010 |
| | | |||||||||||||
June 1, 2010 through June 30, 2010 |
| | | |||||||||||||
Total |
| $ | | - | (2) | $ | 264,773 | |||||||||
(1) | During the fiscal second quarter of 2010, we did not repurchase any shares in open market transactions pursuant to our share repurchase program. We are authorized to repurchase up to $264,773 of our outstanding shares. The repurchase program has no expiration date and may be suspended for periods or discontinued at any time. We did not repurchase any shares other than through our publicly announced repurchase programs. | |
(2) | As of June 30, 2010, an aggregate of 18,098,519 shares were purchased for a total of $485,227 since the inception of the repurchase program announced on September 12, 2008. |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
59
Table of Contents
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
On July 30, 2010, we and certain of our
subsidiaries entered into an amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement with BNP Paribas, as Administrative Agent,
BNP Paribas Securities Corp.,
as Sole Bookrunner and Sole Lead Arranger, and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank and
Natixis, as Syndication Agents.
The amended and restated credit agreement constitutes a material definitive agreement for purposes of Item 1.01 of Form 8-K. The
amended and restated credit agreement is attached to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as Exhibit 10.9.
A summary of the terms and conditions of the amended and restated credit agreement is set forth in Note 5 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The
summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the attached amended and restated credit agreement.
60
Table of Contents
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS |
Exhibit No. | Exhibits | |
3.1
|
Articles of Association of Foster Wheeler AG. (Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Foster Wheeler AGs Form 8-K, dated February 6, 2009 and filed on February 9, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) | |
3.2
|
Organizational Regulations of Foster Wheeler AG. (Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Foster Wheeler AGs Form 8-K, dated February 6, 2009 and filed on February 9, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) | |
4.0
|
Foster Wheeler AG hereby agrees to furnish copies of instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of Foster Wheeler AG and its consolidated subsidiaries to the Commission upon request. | |
10.1*
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Robert C. Flexon. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler AGs Form 8-K, dated May 10, 2010 and filed on May 12, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.) | |
10.2*
|
Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Franco Baseotto. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler AGs Form 8-K, dated May 4, 2010 and filed on May 10, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.) | |
10.3*
|
Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Beth Sexton. | |
10.4*
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of May 28, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc., Michael Liebelson and Foster Wheeler International Corp. | |
10.5*
|
Third Amendment to the Employment Agreement, dated as of May 25, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Rakesh K. Jindal. | |
10.6*
|
Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement, dated as of July 16, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Lisa Z. Wood. | |
10.7*
|
Form of Employee Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement effective May 2010 with respect to certain employees and executive officers. (Filed as Exhibit 10.16 to Foster Wheeler AGs Form 10-Q, for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.) | |
10.8*
|
Form of Employee Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement effective May 2010 with respect to certain employees and executive officers. (Filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Foster Wheeler AGs Form 10-Q, for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.) | |
10.9
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated July 30, 2010, among Foster Wheeler AG, Foster Wheeler Ltd., Foster Wheeler LLC, Foster Wheeler USA Corporation, Foster Wheeler North America Corp., Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler International Corporation, and Foster Wheeler Inc., as Borrowers, the guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto, BNP Paribas as Administrative Agent, BNP Paribas Securities Corp. as Sole Bookrunner and Sole Lead Arranger, and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, and Natixis, as Syndication Agents. | |
23.1
|
Consent of Analysis, Research & Planning Corporation. | |
23.2
|
Consent of Peterson Risk Consulting LLC. | |
31.1
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Robert C. Flexon. | |
31.2
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Franco Baseotto. | |
32.1
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Robert C. Flexon. | |
32.2
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Franco Baseotto. | |
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema | |
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase | |
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase | |
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase | |
101.PRE
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
* | Management contract or compensation plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this form pursuant to Item 15(b) of this report. |
61
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
FOSTER WHEELER AG (Registrant) |
||||
Date: August 5, 2010 | /s/ Robert C. Flexon | |||
Robert C. Flexon | ||||
Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Date: August 5, 2010 | /s/ Franco Baseotto | |||
Franco Baseotto | ||||
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer And Treasurer |
62