Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ALTERA CORPFinancial_Report.xls
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - ALTERA CORPc03030exv31w1.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - ALTERA CORPc03030exv31w2.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - ALTERA CORPc03030exv32w2.htm
EX-10.2 - EXHIBIT 10.2 - ALTERA CORPc03030exv10w2.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - ALTERA CORPc03030exv32w1.htm
EX-10.20 - EXHIBIT 10.20 - ALTERA CORPc03030exv10w20.htm
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
 
(Mark One)
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended July 2, 2010
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission file number 0-16617
ALTERA CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
     
DELAWARE   77-0016691
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
101 INNOVATION DRIVE
SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95134
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
408-544-7000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
             
Large accelerated filer þ   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares of common stock outstanding at July 14, 2010: 307,223,673
 
 

 

 


 

         
    PAGE  
    NUMBER  
 
       
       
 
       
       
 
       
    3  
 
       
    4  
 
       
    5  
 
       
    6  
 
       
    17  
 
       
    25  
 
       
    26  
 
       
       
 
       
    26  
 
       
    27  
 
       
    27  
 
       
    28  
 
       
    29  
 
       
 Exhibit 10.2
 Exhibit 10.20
 Exhibit 31.1
 Exhibit 31.2
 Exhibit 32.1
 Exhibit 32.2
 EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
 EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

 

2


Table of Contents

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1: Financial Statements
ALTERA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
                 
    July 2,     December 31,  
(In thousands, except par value amount)   2010     2009  
Assets
               
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 2,067,215     $ 1,546,672  
Accounts receivable, net
    358,006       218,144  
Inventories
    99,955       69,705  
Deferred income taxes — current
    88,438       79,164  
Deferred compensation plan — marketable securities
    47,050       50,905  
Deferred compensation plan — restricted cash equivalents
    18,053       18,986  
Other current assets
    72,656       58,194  
 
           
Total current assets
    2,751,373       2,041,770  
Property and equipment, net
    165,432       174,516  
Deferred income taxes — non-current
    47,384       59,249  
Other assets, net
    18,801       17,696  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 2,982,990     $ 2,293,231  
 
           
 
               
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
               
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 110,088     $ 50,520  
Accrued liabilities
    19,857       32,256  
Accrued compensation and related liabilities
    63,656       49,862  
Deferred compensation plan obligations
    65,103       69,891  
Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors
    395,429       281,885  
Income taxes payable
    6,569       5,547  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    660,702       489,961  
Income taxes payable — non-current
    220,204       210,967  
Long-term credit facility
    500,000       500,000  
Other non-current liabilities
    7,133       6,967  
 
           
Total liabilities
    1,388,039       1,207,895  
 
           
Commitments and contingencies
(See “Note 10 — Commitments and Contingencies”)
               
Stockholders’ equity:
               
Common stock: $.001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; outstanding — 305,857 at July 2, 2010 and 296,817 shares at December 31, 2009
    306       297  
Capital in excess of par value
    582,348       372,098  
Retained earnings
    1,012,297       712,941  
 
           
Total stockholders’ equity
    1,594,951       1,085,336  
 
           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 2,982,990     $ 2,293,231  
 
           
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

ALTERA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    July 2,     June 26,     July 2,     June 26,  
(In thousands, except per share amounts)   2010     2009     2010     2009  
Net sales
  $ 469,300     $ 279,201     $ 871,595     $ 543,803  
Cost of sales
    132,811       93,588       247,747       187,617  
 
                       
Gross margin
    336,489       185,613       623,848       356,186  
Research and development expense
    65,625       64,981       129,965       123,171  
Selling, general, and administrative expense
    64,767       53,679       126,948       114,338  
Compensation (benefit)/expense — deferred compensation plan
    (3,642 )     3,586       (1,414 )     3,609  
Loss/(gain) on deferred compensation plan securities
    3,642       (3,586 )     1,414       (3,609 )
Interest income and other
    (710 )     (1,717 )     (1,302 )     (5,095 )
Interest expense
    1,103       1,321       2,394       2,659  
 
                       
Income before income taxes
    205,704       67,349       365,843       121,113  
Income tax expense
    25,097       19,926       32,063       29,729  
 
                       
Net income
  $ 180,607     $ 47,423     $ 333,780     $ 91,384  
 
                       
 
                               
Net income per share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.59     $ 0.16     $ 1.11     $ 0.31  
 
                       
Diluted
  $ 0.58     $ 0.16     $ 1.09     $ 0.31  
 
                       
 
                               
Shares used in computing per share amounts:
                               
Basic
    304,531       293,895       301,532       293,511  
 
                       
Diluted
    310,757       295,503       307,526       295,157  
 
                       
 
                               
Cash dividends per common share
  $ 0.05     $ 0.05     $ 0.10     $ 0.10  
 
                       
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

ALTERA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited, in thousands)
                 
    Six Months Ended  
    July 2,     June 26,  
    2010     2009  
 
               
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
               
Net income
  $ 333,780     $ 91,384  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    13,504       14,714  
Stock-based compensation
    29,749       30,435  
Deferred income tax benefit
    (11,296 )     (6,286 )
Tax effect of employee stock plans
    6,996       (1,897 )
Excess tax benefit from employee stock plans
    (6,465 )     (231 )
Gain on substantive termination of retiree medical plan
          (6,488 )
Changes in assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable, net
    (139,862 )     (112,640 )
Inventories
    (30,250 )     18,418  
Other assets
    (15,637 )     30,018  
Accounts payable and other liabilities
    63,756       (21,019 )
Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors
    113,544       27,160  
Income taxes payable
    24,146       26,037  
Deferred compensation plan obligations
    (3,374 )     1,266  
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    378,591       90,871  
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
               
Purchases of property and equipment
    (4,350 )     (6,852 )
Sales (purchases) of deferred compensation plan securities, net
    3,374       (1,266 )
Purchases of intangible assets
          (510 )
 
           
Net cash used in investing activities
    (976 )     (8,628 )
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
               
Proceeds from issuance of common stock through various stock plans
    175,386       11,933  
Shares withheld for employee taxes
    (6,159 )     (4,655 )
Payment of dividends to stockholders
    (30,137 )     (29,370 )
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation
    6,465       231  
Principal payments on capital lease obligations
    (2,627 )     (2,150 )
 
           
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    142,928       (24,011 )
 
           
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
    520,543       58,232  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    1,546,672       1,216,743  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 2,067,215     $ 1,274,975  
 
           
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

ALTERA CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 — Organization and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Altera Corporation and its subsidiaries, collectively referred to herein as “Altera”, “we”, “us”, or “our”, have been prepared by us in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information. This financial information reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of our management, of a normal recurring nature and necessary for a fair statement of the results for the periods presented. The December 31, 2009 consolidated balance sheet data was derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP. The consolidated financial statements include our accounts as well as those of our wholly-owned subsidiaries after elimination of all significant inter-company balances and transactions.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed on February 17, 2010 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The consolidated operating results for the three or six months ended July 2, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period.
Note 2 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Adopted in the Six Months Ended July 2, 2010
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued amended guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures. The new guidance requires additional disclosures regarding fair value measurements, amends disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets, and provides clarification regarding the level of disaggregation of fair value disclosures by investment class. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for certain Level 3 activity disclosure requirements that will be effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. Accordingly, we adopted this amendment in the quarter ended April 2, 2010, except for the additional Level 3 requirements which will be adopted in 2011. See Note 15 — Fair Value of Financial Instruments to our consolidated financial statements.
Subsequent Events
In February 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance on subsequent events. Under this amended guidance, SEC filers are no longer required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in originally issued and revised financial statements. This guidance was effective immediately and we adopted this new guidance in the quarter ended April 2, 2010. See Note 16 — Subsequent Event to our consolidated financial statements.
Note 3 — Accounts Receivable, Net and Significant Customers
Accounts receivable, net was comprised of the following:
                 
    July 2,     December 31,  
(In thousands)   2010     2009  
Gross accounts receivable
  $ 361,325     $ 218,647  
Allowance for doubtful accounts
    (500 )     (500 )
Allowance for sales returns
    (2,819 )     (3 )
 
           
Accounts receivable, net
  $ 358,006     $ 218,144  
 
           

 

6


Table of Contents

We sell our products to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, and to electronic components distributors who resell these products to OEMs, or their subcontract manufacturers. Net sales by customer type and net sales to significant customers were as follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    July 2,     June 26,     July 2,     June 26,  
(Percentage of Net Sales)   2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
                               
Sales to distributors
    84 %     77 %     85 %     78 %
Sales to OEMs
    16 %     23 %     15 %     22 %
 
                       
 
    100 %     100 %     100 %     100 %
 
                       
 
                               
Significant Distributors(1):
                               
Arrow Electronics, Inc. ( “Arrow”)
    48 %     42 %     48 %     42 %
Macnica, Inc. (“Macnica”)
    20 %     13 %     19 %     13 %
     
(1)  
Except as presented above, no other distributor accounted for greater than 10% of our net sales for the three or six months ended July 2, 2010 and June 26, 2009.
No individual OEM accounted for more than 10% of our net sales for the three or six months ended July 2, 2010, while Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., an OEM, individually accounted for 12% and 13% of our net sales for the three and six months ended June 26, 2009, respectively. No other individual OEM accounted for more than 10% of our net sales for the three or six months ended June 26, 2009.
As of July 2, 2010, accounts receivable from Arrow, Macnica and Avnet, Inc. including its affiliates (“Avnet”) individually accounted for approximately 37%, 38% and 11%, respectively, of our total accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2009, accounts receivable from Arrow, Macnica and Avnet individually accounted for approximately 36%, 21% and 14%, respectively, of our total accounts receivable. No other distributor or OEM accounted for more than 10% of our accounts receivable as of July 2, 2010 or December 31, 2009.
Note 4 — Inventories
Inventories were comprised of the following:
                 
    July 2,     December 31,  
(In thousands)   2010     2009  
Raw materials
  $ 10,291     $ 7,158  
Work in process
    58,422       39,652  
Finished goods
    31,242       22,895  
 
           
Total inventories
  $ 99,955     $ 69,705  
 
           

 

7


Table of Contents

Note 5 — Property and Equipment
Property and equipment, net was comprised of the following:
                 
    July 2,     December 31,  
(In thousands)   2010     2009  
Land and land rights
  $ 23,108     $ 23,108  
Buildings
    146,909       152,557  
Equipment and software
    210,346       213,187  
Office furniture and fixtures
    24,011       20,798  
Leasehold improvements
    6,819       6,930  
Construction in progress
    1,564       1,464  
 
           
Property and equipment, at cost
    412,757       418,044  
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
    (247,325 )     (243,528 )
 
           
Property and equipment, net
  $ 165,432     $ 174,516  
 
           
Depreciation expense includes the amortization of assets recorded under capital leases. Depreciation expense was $6.4 million and $13.4 million for the three and six months ended July 2, 2010, respectively. Depreciation expense was $7.1 million and $14.6 million for the three and six months ended June 26, 2009, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense as presented in our consolidated statements of cash flows includes the above amounts, together with amortization expense on our intangible assets. Intangible asset amortization expense was not significant for any period presented in our consolidated statements of income.
Assets held under capital leases, included in Equipment and software as presented above, totaled $6.5 million (net of accumulated amortization of $9.0 million) as of July 2, 2010 and $8.6 million (net of accumulated amortization of $6.9 million) as of December 31, 2009.
Note 6 — Deferred Income and Allowances on Sales to Distributors
Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors was comprised of the following:
                 
    July 2,     December 31,  
(In thousands)   2010     2009  
 
               
Deferred revenue on shipment to distributors
  $ 584,777     $ 363,448  
Deferred cost of sales on shipment to distributors
    (39,374 )     (28,971 )
 
           
Deferred income on shipment to distributors
    545,403       334,477  
Advances to distributors
    (157,333 )     (60,877 )
Other deferred revenue (1)
    7,359       8,285  
 
           
Total
  $ 395,429     $ 281,885  
 
           
     
(1)  
Principally represents revenue deferred on our software and intellectual property licenses.

 

8


Table of Contents

The Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors activity for the six months ended July 2, 2010 and June 26, 2009 was as follows:
                 
    Six Months Ended  
    July 2,     June 26,  
(In thousands)   2010     2009  
 
               
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 281,885     $ 205,674  
Deferred revenue recognized upon shipment to distributors
    4,216,374       2,089,836  
Deferred costs of sales recognized upon shipment to distributors
    (246,151 )     (143,795 )
(Increase) decrease in advances to distributors
    (96,456 )     20,937  
Revenue recognized upon sell-through to end customers
    (744,607 )     (412,025 )
Costs of sales recognized upon sell-through to end customers
    217,260       137,145  
Earned distributor price concessions (1)
    (3,188,650 )     (1,547,332 )
Returns
    (43,300 )     (116,918 )
Decrease in other deferred revenue
    (926 )     (688 )
 
           
Balance at end of period
  $ 395,429     $ 232,834  
 
           
     
(1)  
Average aggregate price concessions typically range from 65% to 80% of our list price on an annual basis, depending upon the composition of our sales, volumes, and factors associated with timing of shipments to distributors.
We sell the majority of our products to distributors worldwide at a list price. However, distributors resell our products to end customers at a very broad range of individually negotiated prices based on a variety of factors, including customer, product, quantity, geography and competitive differentiation. The majority of our distributors’ sales to their customers are priced at a discount from our list price. Under these circumstances, we remit back to the distributor a portion of its original purchase price after the resale transaction is completed and we validate the distributor’s resale information, including end customer, device, quantity and price, against the distributor price concession that we have approved in advance. To receive price concessions, distributors must submit the price concession claims to us for approval within 60 days of the resale of the product to an end customer. It is our practice to apply these negotiated price discounts to future purchases, requiring the distributor to settle receivable balances, on a current basis, generally within 30 days, for amounts originally invoiced. This practice has an adverse impact on the working capital of our distributors. As such, we have entered into agreements with certain distributors whereby we advance cash to the distributors to reduce the distributor’s working capital requirements. These advances are settled in cash at least on a quarterly basis and are estimated based on the amount of ending inventory as reported by the distributor multiplied by a negotiated percentage. Such advances have no impact on revenue recognition or our consolidated statements of income and are a component of Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors on our consolidated balance sheets. We continuously process discounts taken by distributors against our Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors. We adjust the recorded amount of the distributor advances based on cash settlements at the end of each quarter. These advances are set forth in binding legal agreements and are unsecured, bear no interest on unsettled balances, and are due upon demand. The agreements governing these advances can be cancelled by us at any time.
We also enter into arrangements that, in substance, finance distributors’ accounts receivable and inventory. The amounts advanced are classified as Other current assets in our consolidated balance sheets and totaled $55.9 million as of July 2, 2010 and$33.0 million as of December 31, 2009. These arrangements are set forth in binding legal agreements and are unsecured, bear no interest on unsettled balances, and are due upon demand.
Note 7 — Comprehensive Income
The components of comprehensive income were as follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    July 2,     June 26,     July 2,     June 26,  
(In thousands)   2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
                               
Net income
  $ 180,607     $ 47,423     $ 333,780     $ 91,384  
Reversal of accumulated unrecognized loss on retiree medical plan, net of tax effect
                      1,118  
 
                       
Comprehensive income
  $ 180,607     $ 47,423     $ 333,780     $ 92,502  
 
                       

 

9


Table of Contents

Note 8 — Income Per Share
A reconciliation of basic and diluted income per share is presented below:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    July 2,     June 26,     July 2,     June 26,  
(In thousands, except per share amounts)   2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
                               
Basic:
                               
 
                               
Net income
  $ 180,607     $ 47,423     $ 333,780     $ 91,384  
 
                       
Basic weighted shares outstanding
    304,531       293,895       301,532       293,511  
 
                       
Net income per share
  $ 0.59     $ 0.16     $ 1.11     $ 0.31  
 
                       
 
                               
Diluted:
                               
 
                               
Net income
  $ 180,607     $ 47,423     $ 333,780     $ 91,384  
 
                       
 
 
Weighted shares outstanding
    304,531       293,895       301,532       293,511  
Effect of dilutive securities:
                               
Stock options, ESPP, and restricted stock unit shares
    6,226       1,608       5,994       1,646  
 
                       
 
                               
Diluted weighted shares outstanding
    310,757       295,503       307,526       295,157  
 
                       
 
                               
Net income per share
  $ 0.58     $ 0.16     $ 1.09     $ 0.31  
 
                       
In applying the treasury stock method, we excluded 2.5 million and 6.6 million stock option shares for the three and six months ended July 2, 2010, respectively, and 32.8 million and 33.3 million stock option shares for the three and six months ended June 26, 2009, respectively, because their effect was anti-dilutive. While these stock option shares are currently anti-dilutive, they could be dilutive in the future. All restricted stock units outstanding as of July 2, 2010 and June 26, 2009 were included in our treasury stock method calculation.
Note 9 — Long-term Credit Facility
Our total borrowings under our $750 million unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Facility”) as of July 2, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were $500 million. Borrowings under the Facility bear interest at either a Eurodollar rate (“LIBOR”) or a Prime rate, at our option, plus an applicable margin based upon certain financial ratios, determined and payable quarterly. The interest rate as of July 2, 2010 was LIBOR plus 0.35%. In addition, we pay a facility fee on the entire Facility. This facility fee varies with certain financial ratios and was 0.10% as of July 2, 2010. The principal amount of borrowings, together with accrued interest, is due on the maturity date in August 2012. As of July 2, 2010, $250 million was available under the Facility.
The terms of the Facility require compliance with certain financial covenants that require us to maintain specified financial ratios related to interest coverage and financial leverage. As of July 2, 2010, we were in compliance with all such covenants.
Note 10 — Commitments and Contingencies
Indemnification and Product Warranty
We indemnify certain customers, distributors, suppliers, and subcontractors for attorney’s fees and damages and costs awarded against these parties in certain circumstances in which our products are alleged to infringe third party intellectual property rights including patents, trade secrets, trademarks, or copyrights. We cannot estimate the amount of potential future payments, if any, that we might be required to make as a result of these agreements. To date, we have not paid any claim or been required to defend any action related to our indemnification obligations, and accordingly, we have not accrued any amounts for such indemnification obligations. However, we may record charges in the future as a result of these indemnification obligations.

 

10


Table of Contents

We generally warrant our devices for one year, against defects in materials, workmanship and material non-conformance to our specifications. We accrue for known warranty issues if a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated, and accrue for estimated but unidentified issues based on historical activity. If there is a material increase in customer claims compared with our historical experience or if the costs of servicing warranty claims are greater than expected, we may record a charge against cost of sales.
Purchase Obligations
We depend entirely upon subcontractors to manufacture our silicon wafers and provide assembly and test services. Due to lengthy subcontractor lead times, we must order these materials and services from these subcontractors well in advance, and we are obligated to pay for the materials and services once they are completed. As of July 2, 2010, we had approximately $235.9 million of outstanding purchase commitments to such subcontractors. We expect to receive and pay for these materials and services over the next six months.
Legal Proceedings
We are named as a party to a lawsuit concerning our historical stock option practices and related accounting and reporting.
In May and July 2006, we were notified that three shareholder derivative lawsuits had been filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara, by persons identifying themselves as Altera shareholders and purporting to act on behalf of Altera, naming Altera Corporation as a nominal defendant and naming some of our current and former officers and directors as defendants. On July 12, 2006, one of these derivative actions was voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff shareholder. The remaining two derivative lawsuits pending in Santa Clara Superior Court were consolidated into a single action on September 5, 2006. Plaintiffs filed a second amended consolidated complaint on December 15, 2006. On January 30, 2007, Altera and the defendants filed a motion to stay this action pending resolution of the federal derivative action (discussed below). On February 11, 2009, one of the remaining derivative plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed his derivative claims and, on March 20, 2009, the other remaining derivative plaintiff filed a third amended complaint. In June 2009, Altera and the defendants demurred to the third amended complaint. After the court issued a tentative ruling in favor of Altera, the parties agreed to stay the action in order to allow plaintiff to serve a demand on Altera’s board of directors. The plaintiff served the demand on November 4, 2009. In the first quarter of 2010, the board of directors completed its review of the demand and decided to reject the plantiff’s demand. On June 1, 2010, the plaintiff filed a fourth amended complaint, alleging that the board of director’s decision to reject plaintiff’s demand was wrongful. On July 15, 2010, Altera demurred to the fourth amended complaint.
Plaintiff asserts claims against the individual defendants for breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, unjust enrichment, violations of California Corporation Code section 25402, breach of fiduciary duty for insider selling and misappropriation of information, and deceit. Plaintiff’s claims concern the granting of stock options by Altera between 1994 and 2001 and the alleged filing of false and misleading financial statements between 1994 and 2006. All of these claims are asserted derivatively on behalf of Altera. Plaintiff seeks, among other relief, an indeterminate amount of damages from the individual defendants and a judgment directing Altera to reform its corporate governance practices.
During the months of May, June, and July 2006, four other derivative lawsuits were filed by purported Altera shareholders, on behalf of Altera, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. On August 8, 2006, these actions were consolidated, and the plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint on November 30, 2006. On September 15, 2008, the plaintiffs voluntarily agreed to dismiss the case. On September 18, 2008, the court entered an order dismissing the case.
Note 11 — Stock-Based Compensation
Our stock-based compensation plans include the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”) and the 1987 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”).

 

11


Table of Contents

2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
Our equity incentive program is a broad-based, long-term retention program intended to attract, motivate, and retain talented employees as well as align stockholder and employee interests. The 2005 Plan provides stock-based incentive compensation (“awards”) to both our eligible employees and non-employee directors. Awards that may be granted under the 2005 Plan include non-qualified and incentive stock options, restricted stock units (“RSU“s), performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSU“s), restricted stock awards, stock appreciation rights, and stock bonus awards. To date, awards granted under the 2005 Plan consist of stock options, RSUs and PRSUs. The majority of stock-based awards granted under the 2005 Plan vest over four years. Stock options, RSUs and PRSUs granted under the 2005 Plan have a maximum contractual term of ten years. On May 6, 2010, our stockholders approved an amendment to the 2005 Plan to increase the shares reserved for future issuance by 5 million. As of July 2, 2010, the 2005 Plan had a total of 32.4 million shares reserved for future issuance, of which 22.4 million shares were available for future grants.
A summary of activity for our RSUs and PRSUs for the six months ended July 2, 2010 and information regarding RSUs and PRSUs outstanding and expected to vest as of July 2, 2010 is as follows:
                                 
            Weighted-Average     Weighted-Average        
            Grant-Date Fair     Remaining     Aggregate  
(In thousands, except per share   Number of     Market Value Per     Contractual     Intrinsic  
amounts and terms)   Shares     Share     Term (in Years)     Value(1)  
Outstanding, December 31, 2009
    6,952     $ 19.36                  
Grants
    782     $ 23.86                  
Vested
    (839 )   $ 19.65                  
Forfeited
    (205 )   $ 19.79                  
 
                             
Outstanding, July 2, 2010
    6,690     $ 19.84       1.4     $ 166,382  
 
                       
Vested and expected to vest, July 2, 2010
    5,986     $ 19.84       1.3     $ 148,876  
 
                       
     
(1)  
Aggregate intrinsic value represents the closing price per share of our stock on July 2, 2010, multiplied by the number of RSUs and PRSUs outstanding or vested and expected to vest as of July 2, 2010.
A summary of stock option activity for the six months ended July 2, 2010 and information regarding stock options outstanding, exercisable, and vested and expected to vest as of July 2, 2010 is as follows:
                                 
                    Weighted-Average        
            Weighted-Average     Remaining     Aggregate  
(In thousands, except per share   Number of     Exercise Price Per     Contractual     Intrinsic  
amounts and terms)   Shares     Share     Term (in Years)     Value(1)  
Outstanding, December 31, 2009
    30,834     $ 21.89                  
Grants
    75     $ 21.88                  
Exercises
    (7,884 )   $ 21.20                  
Forfeited/Cancelled/Expired
    (346 )   $ 28.60                  
 
                             
Outstanding, July 2, 2010
    22,679     $ 22.03       3.1     $ 78,461  
 
                       
Exercisable, July 2, 2010
    22,146     $ 22.06       3.0     $ 76,130  
 
                       
Vested and expected to vest, July 2, 2010
    22,636     $ 22.03       3.1     $ 78,275  
 
                       
     
(1)  
For those stock options with an exercise price below the closing price per share on July 2, 2010, aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the exercise price and the closing price per share of our common stock on July 2, 2010, multiplied by the number of stock options outstanding, exercisable, or vested and expected to vest as of July 2, 2010.
For the three and six months ended July 2, 2010, 4.0 million and 7.9 million non-qualified stock option shares were exercised, respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised for the three and six months ended July 2, 2010 was $14.4 million and $32.3 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the exercise price and the selling price received by option holders upon the exercise of stock options during the period. The total cash received from employees as a result of employee stock option exercises during the three and six months ended July 2, 2010 was $89.7 million and $167.2 million, respectively.

 

12


Table of Contents

1987 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
Our ESPP has two consecutive, overlapping twelve-month offering periods, with a new period commencing on the first trading day on or after May 1 and November 1 of each year and terminating on the last trading day on or before April 30 and October 31. Each twelve-month offering period generally includes two six-month purchase periods. The purchase price at which shares are sold under the ESPP is 85% of the lower of the fair market value of a share of our common stock on (1) the first day of the offering period, or (2) the last trading day of the purchase period. If the fair market value at the end of any purchase period is less than the fair market value at the beginning of the offering period, each participant is automatically withdrawn from the current offering period following the purchase of shares on the purchase date and is automatically re-enrolled in the immediately following offering period.
We sold 595,861 shares of common stock under the ESPP at a price of $13.81 during the six months ended July 2, 2010, and 619,363 shares of common stock under the ESPP at a price of $13.86 during the six months ended June 26, 2009. On May 6, 2010, our stockholders approved an amendment to the ESPP to increase the shares reserved for future issuance by 1 million. As of July 2, 2010, 2.6 million shares were available for future issuance under the ESPP.
VALUATION AND EXPENSE INFORMATION
The assumptions used to estimate the fair value of ESPP, RSUs and PRSUs were as follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    July 2,     June 26,     July 2,     June 26,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
                               
ESPP purchase rights:
                               
Expected term (in years)
    0.7       0.8       0.7       0.8  
Expected stock price volatility
    31.2 %     50.6 %     31.2 %     50.6 %
Risk-free interest rate
    0.3 %     0.4 %     0.3 %     0.4 %
Dividend yield
    0.8 %     1.2 %     0.8 %     1.2 %
Weighted-average estimated fair value
  $ 6.56     $ 5.09     $ 6.56     $ 5.09  
 
                               
RSUs and PRSUs:
                               
Risk-free interest rate
    1.2 %     1.0 %     1.2 %     1.1 %
Dividend yield
    0.8 %     1.3 %     0.8 %     1.4 %
Weighted-average estimated fair value
  $ 25.10     $ 15.10     $ 23.38     $ 14.34  
In addition, we apply an expected forfeiture rate when amortizing stock-based compensation expense. Our stock-based compensation expense included in the consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended July 2, 2010 and June 26, 2009 was as follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    July 2,     June 26,     July 2,     June 26,  
(In thousands)   2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
                               
Cost of sales
  $ 314     $ 438     $ 594     $ 913  
Research and development
    6,902       6,129       13,055       12,783  
Selling, general, and administrative
    8,471       8,026       16,100       16,739  
 
                       
Pre-tax stock-based compensation expense
    15,687       14,593       29,749       30,435  
Less: income tax benefit
    (4,688 )     (4,308 )     (8,715 )     (8,473 )
 
                       
Net stock-based compensation expense
  $ 10,999     $ 10,285     $ 21,034     $ 21,962  
 
                       
No stock-based compensation was capitalized during any period presented above. As of July 2, 2010, unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to outstanding unvested stock options, RSUs, PRSUs and ESPP shares that are expected to vest was approximately $90.0 million. This unrecognized stock-based compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.2 years. To the extent the actual forfeiture rate is different from what we have anticipated, stock-based compensation related to these awards will be different from our expectations.

 

13


Table of Contents

Note 12 — Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate reflects the impact of a significant amount of our earnings being taxed in foreign jurisdictions at rates below the U.S. statutory tax rate.
Our effective tax rate for the three months ended July 2, 2010 was 12.2%, compared with 29.6% for the three months ended June 26, 2009. The significant net decrease in our effective tax rate when comparing these periods was primarily due to two factors. During the quarter ended April 2, 2010, we reversed $11.7 million of liabilities for uncertain tax positions that were originally recorded in the quarter ended June 29, 2009, as a result of a court ruling issued on March 22, 2010, which held that stock based compensation was not required to be included in certain transfer pricing arrangements between a U.S. company and its foreign subsidiary. In addition, the decrease in our effective tax rate in the quarter was also due to the impact of proportionately higher earnings in foreign jurisdictions taxed at rates below the U.S. statutory tax rate, partially offset by the increase in the effective tax rate due to the expiration of the U.S. Federal Research and Development Tax Credit.
Our effective tax rate for the six months ended July 2, 2010 was 8.8%, compared with 24.5% for the six months ended June 26, 2009. The significant net decrease in our effective tax rate when comparing these periods was primarily due to the impact of certain discrete tax adjustments. As discussed above, during the quarter ended April 2, 2010, we reversed $11.7 million of liabilities, that were originally recorded in the quarter ended June 26, 2009, for uncertain tax positions. In addition, we reversed $3.4 million of liabilities for uncertain tax positions due to the expiration of the statute of limitations for certain foreign jurisdictions. The decrease in our effective tax rate during the six month period was also due to the impact of proportionately higher earnings in foreign jurisdictions taxed at rates below the U.S. statutory tax rate, partially offset by the increase in the effective tax rate due to the expiration of the U.S. Federal Research and Development Tax Credit.
We file income tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and in various states and foreign jurisdictions. The IRS has completed field examinations of our tax returns for 2002 through 2004 and has issued a notice of proposed adjustment seeking additional taxes of approximately $34.5 million (excluding interest) for those years. We paid $18.0 million to the IRS in 2008, representing a payment on bond for items associated with the IRS field examinations for 2002 through 2004. We are contesting through the administrative process the IRS claims regarding our 2002 through 2004 tax years. In addition, the IRS has completed field examinations of our tax returns for 2005 through 2007 and has issued a notice of proposed adjustment seeking additional taxes of approximately $34.3 million (excluding interest) for those years. We are contesting through the administrative process the IRS claims regarding our 2005 through 2007 tax years. Other significant jurisdictions in which we may be subject to examination for fiscal years 2002 forward include China (including Hong Kong), Ireland, Japan, and the state of California. As mentioned below, we believe we have made adequate tax payments and/or accrued adequate amounts such that the outcome of these audits will have no material adverse effect on our consolidated operating results. Due to the potential resolution of federal, state and foreign examinations, and the expiration of various statutes of limitations, it is possible that our gross unrecognized tax benefits may change within the next twelve months.
We maintain liabilities for uncertain tax positions. These liabilities involve considerable judgment and estimation and are continuously monitored by management based on the best information available, including changes in tax regulations, the outcome of relevant court cases, and other information. We are currently under examination by various taxing authorities. Although the outcome of any tax audit is uncertain, we believe we have adequately provided in our consolidated financial statements for any additional taxes that we may be required to pay as a result of such examinations. If the payment ultimately proves to be unnecessary, the reversal of these tax liabilities would result in tax benefits being recognized in the period we determine such liabilities are no longer necessary. However, if an ultimate tax assessment exceeds our estimate of tax liabilities, additional tax expense will be recorded. The impact of such adjustments could have a material impact on our results of operations in future periods.
As of July 2, 2010 we had $243.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits. On December 31, 2009, we had $244.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits. We are unable to make a reasonable estimate as to when cash settlements with the relevant taxing authorities will occur.
We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in our income tax provision. We had accrued approximately $44.0 million and $47.1 million for the payment of interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as of July 2, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

 

14


Table of Contents

Note 13 — Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan
We allow our U.S.-based officers and director-level employees to defer a portion of their compensation under the Altera Corporation Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (“NQDC Plan”). Our Retirement Plans Committee administers the NQDC Plan. As of July 2, 2010, there were approximately 114 participants in the NQDC Plan who self-direct their investments, subject to certain limitations. In the event we become insolvent, the NQDC Plan assets are subject to the claims of our general creditors. Since the inception of the NQDC Plan, we have not made any contributions to the NQDC Plan and we have no commitments to do so in the future. There are no NQDC Plan provisions that provide for any guarantees or minimum return on investments. NQDC Plan participants are prohibited from investing NQDC Plan contributions in Altera common stock. The balance of the NQDC Plan assets and related obligations was $65.1 million and $69.9 million as of July 2, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Investment income or loss earned by the NQDC Plan is recorded as Loss/(gain)on deferred compensation plan securities in our consolidated statements of income. The investment (gain) loss also represents an (increase) decrease in the future payout to participants and is recorded as Compensation (benefit)/expense — deferred compensation plan in our consolidated statements of income. Compensation expense (benefit) associated with our NQDC Plan obligations is offset by (gain) loss from related securities. The net effect of investment income or loss and related compensation expense or benefit has no impact on our income before income taxes, net income, or cash balances.
Note 14 — Restructuring Charges
During the six months ended June 26, 2009, we announced a net reduction of approximately 33 positions which represented 1.2% of our workforce. We incurred restructuring-related charges of approximately $5.2 million in the six months ended June 26, 2009. The charges were comprised of employee severance costs of approximately $2.9 million and charges related to the termination of certain external sales representatives of approximately $2.3 million. No significant restructuring activities were initiated in the six months ended July 2, 2010. The remaining restructuring obligations as of July 2, 2010 are not significant.
Note 15 — Fair Value Measurements
We define fair value as the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. This is sometimes referred to as an “exit price”. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability, also taking into consideration the principal or most advantageous market in which market participants would transact and the market based risk measurements or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk and credit risk. We apply the following fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
     
Level 1
  Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets
 
   
Level 2
  Inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly
 
   
Level 3
  Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require us to develop our own assumptions
This hierarchy requires us to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. On a recurring basis, we measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, which consist of our cash equivalents and marketable securities.

 

15


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the valuation of our financial instruments, which was determined by using the following inputs as of July 2, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
                                 
            Fair Value Measurements as of July 2, 2010  
                            Significant  
            Quoted Prices in Active     Significant Other     Unobservable  
            Markets for Identical     Observable Inputs     Inputs  
(In thousands)   Total     Assets (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
Assets:
                               
Cash and cash equivalents(1)
                               
Money market funds
  $ 2,013,792     $ 2,013,792     $     $  
 
                               
Deferred compensation plan assets(2)
                               
Restricted cash equivalents
    18,053       18,053              
Equity securities
    18,617       18,617              
Fixed income securities
    5,655             5,655        
Mutual funds
    22,778       22,778              
 
                       
Total
  $ 2,078,895     $ 2,073,240     $ 5,655     $  
 
                       
                                 
            Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2009  
                            Significant  
            Quoted Prices in Active     Significant Other     Unobservable  
            Markets for Identical     Observable Inputs     Inputs  
(In thousands)   Total     Assets (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
Assets:
                               
Cash and cash equivalents(1)
                               
Money market funds
  $ 1,450,112     $ 1,450,112     $     $  
 
                               
Deferred compensation plan assets(2)
                               
Restricted cash equivalents
    18,986       18,986              
Equity securities
    22,530       22,530              
Fixed income securities
    5,002             5,002        
Mutual funds
    23,373       22,523       850        
 
                       
Total
  $ 1,520,003     $ 1,514,151     $ 5,852     $  
 
                       
     
(1)  
Included in Cash and cash equivalents in our consolidated balance sheets.
 
(2)  
Included in Deferred compensation plan — marketable securities and Deferred compensation plan — restricted cash equivalents in our consolidated balance sheets.
Our cash equivalents and investment securities are classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. The types of instruments valued based on quoted market prices in active markets include money market securities, exchange traded stocks and open-end mutual funds. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
The types of instruments valued based on other observable inputs include bank commercial deposits, corporate commercial paper and municipal obligations. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Note 16 — Subsequent Event
On July 19, 2010, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.06 per common share, payable on September 1, 2010 to stockholders of record on August 10, 2010.

 

16


Table of Contents

ITEM 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, as well as information contained in the risk factors described in Item 1A of this report and elsewhere in this report, contains forward-looking statements, which are provided under the “safe harbor” protection of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are generally written in the future tense and/or are preceded by words such as “will,” “may,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “suggest,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” or other similar words. Examples of forward-looking statements include statements regarding (1) our gross margins and factors that affect gross margins; (2) trends in our future sales; (3) our research and development expenditures and efforts; (4) our capital expenditures; (5) our provision for tax liabilities and other critical accounting estimates; and (6) our exposure to market risks related to changes in interest rates, equity prices and foreign currency exchange rates.
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements contained in this report are based on information that is currently available to us and expectations and assumptions that we deemed reasonable at the time the statements were made. We do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements in this report or in any of our other communications, except as required by law. All such forward-looking statements should be read as of the time the statements were made and with the recognition that these forward-looking statements may not be complete or accurate at a later date.
Many factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this report. These factors include, but are not limited to, those risks described in Part II Item 1A of this report and those risks described under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires our management to make judgments and estimates that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Our management believes that we consistently apply these judgments and estimates and the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes fairly represent all periods presented. However, any differences between these judgments and estimates and actual results could have a material impact on our consolidated statements of income and financial position. Critical accounting estimates, as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), are those that are most important to the portrayal of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations and require our management’s most difficult and subjective judgments and estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Our critical accounting estimates include those regarding (1) revenue recognition, (2) valuation of inventories, and (3) income taxes. For a discussion of our critical accounting estimates, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Estimates” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Sales Overview
We design, manufacture, and market high-performance, high-density programmable logic devices, or PLDs; HardCopy® ASIC devices; pre-defined software design building blocks known as intellectual property cores, or IP cores; and associated development tools.
Our net sales of $469.3 million for the three months ended July 2, 2010 increased by $190.1 million, or 68%, from our net sales of $279.2 million for the three months ended June 26, 2009. Our net sales of $871.6 million for the six months ended July 2, 2010 increased by $327.8 million, or 60%, from our net sales of $543.8 million for the six months ended June 26, 2009. The significant increase in net sales was broad-based, covering large and small customer categories and all geographies. The increase was primarily due to strong growth in sales of our New Products and Mainstream Products. We continue to see evidence of a “tipping point” with respect to our opportunity to displace ASICs and ASSPs, as our newest products are several process generations ahead of mainstream ASICs and ASSPs, and the resulting FPGA cost advantage is accelerating ASIC and ASSP replacement.

 

17


Table of Contents

Sales by Product Category
We classify our products into three categories: New, Mainstream, and Mature and Other Products. The composition of each product category is as follows:
   
New Products include the Stratix® III, Stratix IV (including E, GX and GT), Arria® II GX, Cyclone® III, Cyclone IV GX, MAX® II, and HardCopy III devices;
   
Mainstream Products include the Stratix II (and GX), Arria GX, Cyclone II, and HardCopy II devices; and
   
Mature and Other Products include the Stratix (and GX), Cyclone, Classic™, MAX 3000A, MAX 7000, MAX 7000A, MAX 7000B, MAX 7000S, MAX 9000, HardCopy, FLEX® series, APEX™ series, Mercury™, Excalibur™, configuration and other devices, intellectual property cores, and software and other tools.
The product categories above have been constructed to approximate the relative life cycle stages of our products. The product categories’ compositions are adjusted approximately every two to three years. During the three months ended April 2, 2010, we adjusted product categories to move certain products from New Products to Mainstream Products and certain products from Mainstream Products to Mature and Other Products. All prior period data has been adjusted to conform to the current classification. New Products are primarily comprised of our most advanced products. Customers typically select these products for their latest generation of electronic systems. Demand is generally driven by prototyping and production needs. Mainstream Products are somewhat older products that are generally no longer design-win vehicles. Demand is driven by customers’ later stage production-based needs. Mature Products are yet older products with demand generated by the oldest customer systems still in production. This category also includes sales of software, intellectual property, and other miscellaneous devices.
Net sales by product category were as follows:
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Year-             Six Months Ended     Year-  
    July 2,     June 26,     April 2,     Over-Year     Sequential     July 2,     June 26,     Over-Year  
    2010     2009     2010     Change     Change     2010     2009     Change  
 
                                                               
New
    40 %     22 %     34 %     199 %     36 %     37 %     20 %     206 %
Mainstream
    29 %     34 %     30 %     46 %     13 %     30 %     34 %     40 %
Mature and Other
    31 %     44 %     36 %     18 %     1 %     33 %     46 %     15 %
 
                                                     
Net Sales
    100 %     100 %     100 %     68 %     17 %     100 %     100 %     60 %
 
                                                     
Sales by Vertical Market
The following vertical market data is derived from data that is provided to us by our distributors and end customers. With a broad base of customers, who in some cases manufacture end products spanning multiple market segments, the assignment of net sales to a vertical market requires the use of estimates, judgment, and extrapolation. As such, actual results may differ from those reported.
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Year-             Six Months Ended     Year-  
    July 2,     June 26,     April 2,     Over-Year     Sequential     July 2,     June 26,     Over-Year  
    2010     2009     2010     Change     Change     2010     2009     Change  
 
                                                               
Telecom & Wireless
    42 %     48 %     40 %     45 %     21 %     41 %     47 %     39 %
Industrial Automation, Military & Auto
    23 %     21 %     24 %     87 %     14 %     23 %     21 %     81 %
Networking, Computer & Storage
    13 %     13 %     13 %     74 %     21 %     13 %     14 %     51 %
Other
    22 %     18 %     23 %     103 %     11 %     23 %     18 %     100 %
 
                                                     
Net Sales
    100 %     100 %     100 %     68 %     17 %     100 %     100 %     60 %
 
                                                     

 

18


Table of Contents

Sales of FPGAs and CPLDs
Our PLDs consist of field-programmable gate arrays, or FPGAs, and complex programmable logic devices, or CPLDs. FPGAs consist of our Stratix, Cyclone, Arria, APEX, FLEX, and ACEX® series, as well as our Excalibur and Mercury families. CPLDs consist of our MAX, MAX II, and Classic families. Other Products consist of our HardCopy series and other masked programmed logic devices, configuration devices, software and other tools and IP cores (collectively, “Other Products”).
Our net sales of FPGAs and CPLDs, and Other Products were as follows:
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Year-             Six Months Ended     Year-  
    July 2,     June 26,     April 2,     Over-Year     Sequential     July 2,     June 26,     Over-Year  
    2010     2009     2010     Change     Change     2010     2009     Change  
 
                                                               
FPGA
    82 %     76 %     79 %     81 %     20 %     80 %     76 %     69 %
CPLD
    12 %     16 %     14 %     28 %     (1 )%     13 %     15 %     37 %
Other Products
    6 %     8 %     7 %     30 %     11 %     7 %     9 %     26 %
 
                                                     
Net Sales
    100 %     100 %     100 %     68 %     17 %     100 %     100 %     60 %
 
                                                     
Sales by Geography
During the first quarter of 2010, we introduced new geographic terms of Americas (previously reported as North America), and EMEA (including Europe, the Middle East and Africa, previously reported as Europe) to more closely align with the geographic regions we serve.
The following table is based on the geographic location of the original equipment manufacturers or the distributors who purchased our products. The introduction of new geographic terms had no impact on any prior period data, as previously reported. The geographic location of distributors may be different from the geographic location of the ultimate end users.
Net sales by geography were as follows:
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Year-             Six Months Ended     Year-  
    July 2,     June 26,     April 2,     Over-Year     Sequential     July 2,     June 26,     Over-Year  
    2010     2009     2010     Change     Change     2010     2009     Change  
 
                                                               
Americas
    20 %     20 %     19 %     66 %     18 %     19 %     19 %     63 %
Asia Pacific
    41 %     43 %     40 %     61 %     22 %     41 %     41 %     59 %
EMEA
    24 %     21 %     24 %     86 %     14 %     24 %     23 %     69 %
Japan
    15 %     16 %     17 %     65 %     6 %     16 %     17 %     48 %
 
                                                     
Net Sales
    100 %     100 %     100 %     68 %     17 %     100 %     100 %     60 %
 
                                                     
Price Concessions and Product Returns from Distributors
We sell the majority of our products to distributors worldwide at a list price. However, distributors resell our products to end customers at a very broad range of individually negotiated prices based on a variety of factors, including customer, product, quantity, geography and competitive differentiation. The majority of our distributors’ sales to their customers are priced at a discount from our list price. Under these circumstances, we remit back to the distributor a portion of its original purchase price after the resale transaction is completed and we validate the distributor’s resale information, including end customer, device, quantity and price, against the distributor price concession that we have approved in advance. To receive price concessions, distributors must submit the price concession claims to us for approval within 60 days of the resale of the product to an end customer. Primarily because of the uncertainty related to the final price, we defer revenue recognition on sales to distributors until our products are sold from the distributor to the end customer, which is when our price is fixed or determinable. Accordingly, these pricing uncertainties impact our results of operations, liquidity and capital resources. Total price concessions earned by distributors were $3.2 billion and $1.5 billion for the six months ended July 2, 2010 and June 26, 2009, respectively. See Note 6 — Deferred Income and Allowances on Sales to Distributors to our consolidated financial statements. Average aggregate price concessions typically range from 65% to 80% of our list price on an annual basis, depending upon the composition of our sales, volume and factors associated with timing of shipments to distributors.

 

19


Table of Contents

Our distributors have certain rights under our contracts to return defective, overstocked, obsolete or discontinued products. Our stock rotation program generally allows distributors to return unsold product to Altera, subject to certain contract limits, based on a percentage of sales occurring over various periods prior to the stock rotation. Products resold by the distributor to end customers are no longer eligible for return, unless specifically authorized by us. In addition, we generally warrant our products against defects in material, workmanship and non-conformance to our specifications. Returns from distributors totaled $43.3 million and $116.9 million for the six months ended July 2, 2010 and June 26, 2009, respectively. See Note 6 — Deferred Income and Allowances on Sales to Distributors to our consolidated financial statements.
Gross Margin
                                         
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    July 2,     June 26,     April 2,     July 2,     June 26,  
    2010     2009     2010     2010     2009  
 
                                       
Gross Margin Percentage
    71.7 %     66.5 %     71.4 %     71.6 %     65.5 %
Gross margin rates are heavily influenced by both vertical market mix and the timing of material cost improvements. Our gross margin percentage for the three and six months ended July 2, 2010, increased by 5.2 points and 6.1 points, respectively, compared with the three and six months ended June 26, 2009, primarily as a result of manufacturing cost reductions, specifically due to improved yields on certain of our new products and increased efficiency in our processes. While these variables will continue to fluctuate on a quarterly basis, we continue to target a 65% gross margin over the long term. We believe the 65% gross margin target affords us the right mix of growth opportunities across all served markets.
Stock-based compensation expense included in Cost of sales during the three or six months ended July 2, 2010 and June 26, 2009 did not have a significant impact on our gross margin.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development expense includes costs for compensation and benefits (including stock-based compensation), development masks, prototype wafers, and depreciation and amortization. These expenditures are for the design of new PLD and ASIC families, the development of process technologies, new package technology, software to support new products and design environments, and IP cores.
We will continue to make significant investments in the development of new products and focus our efforts on the development of new programmable logic devices that use advanced semiconductor wafer fabrication processes, as well as related development software. We are currently investing in the development of future silicon products, as well as our Quartus® II software, our library of IP cores, and other future products.
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Year-             Six Months Ended     Year-  
    July 2,     June 26,     April 2,     Over-Year     Sequential     July 2,     June 26,     Over-Year  
(In millions)   2010     2009     2010     Change     Change     2010     2009     Change  
 
                                                               
Research and Development Expense
  $ 65.6     $ 65.0     $ 64.3       1 %     2 %   $ 130.0     $ 123.2       6 %
Percentage of Net Sales
    14.0 %     23.3 %     16.0 %                     14.9 %     22.6 %        

 

20


Table of Contents

Research and development expense for the three months ended July 2, 2010 increased by $0.6 million, or 1%, when compared with the three months ended June 26, 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to the following offsetting factors: a $9.1 million increase in variable compensation expense based on higher operating results for the three months ended July 2, 2010 and an $8.3 million decrease in spending on masks and wafers due to the timing of product development activities.
Research and development expense for the six months ended July 2, 2010 increased by $6.8 million, or 6%, when compared with the six months ended June 26, 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to the following offsetting factors: a $16.1 million increase in variable compensation expense based on higher operating results for the six months ended July 2, 2010, the absence of a gain of $3.6 million from the substantive termination of our retiree medical plan during the six months ended June 26, 2009, a $10.1 million decrease in spending on masks and wafers due to the timing of product development activities, and a $3.8 million decrease in labor costs as a result of cost savings from our restructuring activities initiated in 2009.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expense
Selling, general, and administrative expense primarily includes compensation and benefits (including stock-based compensation) related to sales, marketing, and administrative employees, commissions and incentives, depreciation, legal, advertising, facilities, and travel expenses.
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Year-             Six Months Ended     Year-  
    July 2,     June 26,     April 2,     Over-Year     Sequential     July 2,     June 26,     Over-Year  
(In millions)   2010     2009     2010     Change     Change     2010     2009     Change  
 
                                                               
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
  $ 64.8     $ 53.7     $ 62.2       21 %     4 %   $ 126.9     $ 114.3       11 %
Percentage of Net Sales
    13.8 %     19.2 %     15.5 %                     14.6 %     21.0 %        
Selling, general, and administrative expense for the three months ended July 2, 2010 increased by $11.1 million, or 21%, when compared with the three months ended June 26, 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to a $5.3 million increase in variable compensation expense based on higher operating results for the second quarter of 2010, a $1.9 million increase in labor costs due to the hiring activity during the three months ended July 2, 2010, and a $2.5 million increase in commission expenses driven by higher sales volume for the three months ended July 2, 2010.
Selling, general, and administrative expense for the six months ended July 2, 2010 increased by $12.6 million, or 11%, when compared with the six months ended June 26, 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to a $9.2 million increase in variable compensation expense based on higher operating results for the six months ended July 2, 2010, and the absence of a gain of $2.6 million from the substantive termination of our retiree medical plan during the six months ended June 26, 2009.
Deferred Compensation Plan
We allow our U.S.-based officers and director-level employees to defer a portion of their compensation under the Altera Corporation Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (“NQDC Plan”). Since the inception of the NQDC Plan, we have not made any contributions to the NQDC Plan and we have no commitments to do so in the future. There are no NQDC Plan provisions that provide for any guarantees or minimum return on investments. Investment income or loss earned by the NQDC Plan is recorded as Loss/(gain) on deferred compensation plan securities in our consolidated statements of income. We reported net investment losses of $3.6 million and $1.4 million on NQDC Plan assets for the three and six months ended July 2, 2010, respectively. We reported a net investment gain of $3.6 million on NQDC Plan assets for each of the three and six months ended June 26, 2009. These amounts resulted from the overall market performance of the underlying securities. The investment loss (gain) also represents a decrease (increase) in the future payout to employees and is recorded as Compensation (benefit)/expense — deferred compensation plan in our consolidated statements of income. The compensation expense (benefit) associated with our deferred compensation plan obligations is offset by losses (gains) from related securities. The net effect of the investment income or loss and related compensation expense or benefit has no impact on our income before income taxes, net income, or cash balances. See Note 13 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan to our consolidated financial statements for a detailed discussion of our NQDC Plan.

 

21


Table of Contents

Interest Income and Other
Interest income and other decreased by $1.0 million and $3.8 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended July 2, 2010 when compared with the same periods in 2009. Interest income and other consists mainly of interest income generated from investments in high-quality fixed income securities. The decrease in Interest income and other was primarily due to a decrease in interest income as a result of lower returns on our money market funds.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the three and six months ended July 2, 2010 remained relatively flat when compared with the same periods in 2009, as a result of consistency in the amount of outstanding borrowings and the comparability of interest rates in each period. See Note 9 Long-term Credit Facility to our consolidated financial statements.
Income Tax Expense
Our effective tax rate reflects the impact of a significant amount of our earnings being taxed in foreign jurisdictions at rates below the U.S. statutory tax rate.
Our effective tax rate for the three months ended July 2, 2010 was 12.2%, compared with 29.6% for the three months ended June 26, 2009. The significant net decrease in our effective tax rate when comparing these periods was primarily due to two factors. During the quarter ended April 2, 2010, we reversed $11.7 million of liabilities for uncertain tax positions that were originally recorded in the quarter ended June 29, 2009, as a result of a court ruling issued on March 22, 2010, which held that stock based compensation was not required to be included in certain transfer pricing arrangements between a U.S. company and its foreign subsidiary. In addition, the decrease in our effective tax rate in the quarter was also due to the impact of proportionately higher earnings in foreign jurisdictions taxed at rates below the U.S. statutory tax rate, partially offset by the increase in the effective tax rate due to the expiration of the U.S. Federal Research and Development Tax Credit.
Our effective tax rate for the six months ended July 2, 2010 was 8.8%, compared with 24.5% for the six months ended June 26, 2009. The significant net decrease in our effective tax rate when comparing these periods was primarily due to the impact of certain discrete tax adjustments. As discussed above, during the quarter ended April 2, 2010, we reversed $11.7 million of liabilities, that were originally recorded in the quarter ended June 26, 2009, for uncertain tax positions. In addition, we reversed $3.4 million of liabilities for uncertain tax positions due to the expiration of the statute of limitations for certain foreign jurisdictions. The decrease in our effective tax rate during the six month period was also due to the impact of proportionately higher earnings in foreign jurisdictions taxed at rates below the U.S. statutory tax rate, partially offset by the increase in the effective tax rate due to the expiration of the U.S. Federal Research and Development Tax Credit.
As of July 2, 2010 we had $243.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits. On December 31, 2009, we had $244.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits. We are unable to make a reasonable estimate as to when cash settlements with the relevant taxing authorities will occur.
See Note 12 Income Taxes to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
Restructuring Charges
During the six months ended June 26, 2009, we announced a net reduction of approximately 33 positions which represented 1.2% of our workforce. We incurred restructuring-related charges of approximately $5.2 million in the six months ended June 26, 2009. The charges were comprised of employee severance costs of approximately $2.9 million and charges related to the termination of certain external sales representatives of approximately $2.3 million. No significant restructuring activities were initiated in the six months ended July 2, 2010. The remaining restructuring obligations as of July 2, 2010 are not significant.

 

22


Table of Contents

FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We derive our liquidity and capital resources primarily from our cash flows from operations. We have a $750 million unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Facility”), which has been used primarily to fund common stock repurchases and to realign our capital structure. As of July 2, 2010, we had borrowed $500 million under the Facility. The remaining capacity of $250 million available under the Facility also represents a source of liquidity. The terms of the Facility require compliance with certain financial and non-financial covenants. Financial covenants require us to maintain certain financial ratios related to interest coverage and financial leverage. As of July 2, 2010, we were in compliance with all such covenants. See Note 9 — Long-term Credit Facility to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the Facility.
We use cash from operations and available amounts under the Facility for repurchases of our common stock, cash dividends, and capital expenditures. Based on past performance and current expectations, we believe our current available sources of funds including cash, cash equivalents, and the Facility, plus anticipated cash generated from operations, will be adequate to finance our operations, stock repurchases, cash dividends and capital expenditures for at least the next year.
Our cash and cash equivalents balance during the six months ended July 2, 2010 increased by $520.5 million. The change in cash and cash equivalents during the six months ended July 2, 2010 and June 26, 2009 was as follows:
                 
    Six Months Ended  
    July 2,     June 26,  
(In thousands)   2010     2009  
 
               
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 378,591     $ 90,871  
Net cash used in investing activities
    (976 )     (8,628 )
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    142,928       (24,011 )
 
           
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
  $ 520,543     $ 58,232  
 
           
Operating Activities
For the six months ended July 2, 2010, our operating activities provided $378.6 million in cash, primarily attributable to net income of $333.8 million, adjusted for non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $30.3 million (net of related tax effects), depreciation and amortization of $13.5 million, and deferred income tax benefit of $11.3 million. The net increase of $12.3 million in working capital accounts (excluding cash and cash equivalents) was primarily due to a $63.8 million increase in Accounts payable and other liabilities, a $113.5 million increase in Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors and a $24.1 million increase in Income tax payable, partially offset by a $139.9 million increase in Accounts receivable, net, and a $30.3 million increase in Inventories.
Our sales to distributors are primarily made under agreements allowing for subsequent price adjustments and returns, and we defer recognition of revenue until the products are resold by the distributor. At the time of shipment to distributors, we (1) record a trade receivable at the list selling price since there is a legally enforceable obligation from the distributor to pay us currently for product delivered, (2) relieve inventory for the carrying value of goods shipped since legal title has passed to the distributor, and (3) record deferred revenue and deferred cost of sales in Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors in the liability section of our consolidated balance sheets. Accordingly, increases in Accounts receivable, net associated with higher billings are generally offset by corresponding increases in Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors. However, timing differences between gross billings, advances to distributors, discounts earned, collections, revenue recognition and changes in the mix of sales to OEMs and distributors may result in a temporary interruption to the normal relationship between these two accounts.
The $139.9 million increase in Accounts receivable, net, principally related to increased gross billings to distributors and OEMs associated with an upward trend in demand for our products in June 2010 compared with December 2009. The $113.5 million increase in Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors was not as significant an increase as was experienced in Accounts receivable, net, from the increased gross billings, due to the timing factors discussed above. As previously mentioned, gross billings were significantly higher in June 2010 than in December 2009, but were slightly outpaced by sell-through to end customers when comparing the same periods, thus lessening the impact of the increase in gross billings on Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors. In addition, as a result of the increased gross billings, advances to distributors increased by $96.5 million, which also lessened the impact of the higher gross billings. See Note 6 — Deferred Income and Allowances on Sales to Distributors to our consolidated financial statements.
The $30.3 million increase in Inventories was primarily attributable to our plan to get back to a desired inventory level. The $63.8 million increase in Accounts payable and other liabilities was primarily due to the increase in inventory purchased during the six months ended July 2, 2010 and higher accruals associated with increased business volume. The $24.1 million increase in Income tax payable primarily resulted from higher tax liabilities due to increases in earnings.

 

23


Table of Contents

Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities in the six months ended July 2, 2010 primarily consisted of net sales of deferred compensation plan securities of $3.4 million and purchases of property and equipment of $4.4 million.
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities in the six months ended July 2, 2010 primarily consisted of proceeds of $175.4 million from the issuance of common stock to employees through our employee stock plans, partially offset by cash dividend payments of $30.1 million, principal payments on capital lease obligations of $2.6 million and minimum statutory withholding for vested restricted stock units of $6.2 million. Our dividend policy could be impacted in the future by, among other items, future changes in our cash flows from operations and our capital spending needs such as those relating to research and development, investments and acquisitions, common stock repurchases, and other strategic investments.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
We depend entirely upon subcontractors to manufacture our silicon wafers and provide assembly and test services. Due to lengthy subcontractor lead times, we must order these materials and services from these subcontractors well in advance, and we are obligated to pay for the materials and services once they are completed. As of July 2, 2010, we had approximately $235.9 million of outstanding purchase commitments to such subcontractors. We expect to receive and pay for these materials and services over the next six months.
We also lease facilities under non-cancelable lease agreements expiring at various times through 2015. There have been no significant changes to our operating lease obligations since December 31, 2009. The balance of our capital lease obligations included in our consolidated balance sheets was $0.2 million as of July 2, 2010 and $2.9 million as of December 31, 2009.
In addition to these lease and purchase obligations, in the normal course of business, we enter into a variety of agreements and financial commitments. It is not possible to predict the maximum potential amount of future payments under these agreements due to the conditional nature of our obligations and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Historically, payments pursuant to such agreements have not been material. We believe that any future payments required pursuant to such agreements would not be significant to our consolidated financial position or operating results.
As of July 2, 2010, we had $243.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits. Due to the uncertainty with respect to the timing of future cash flows associated with our unrecognized tax benefits as of July 2, 2010, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate as to when cash settlements with the relevant taxing authorities will occur.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
As of July 2, 2010, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.
IMPACT OF FOREIGN CURRENCY AND INFLATION
We have international operations and incur expenditures in currencies other than U.S. dollars. For non-U.S. subsidiaries and branches, foreign currency transaction gains and losses and the impact of the remeasurement of local currency assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars for the three or six months ended July 2, 2010 and June 26, 2009 was not significant. We do not enter into foreign exchange transactions for trading or speculative purposes.

 

24


Table of Contents

SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On July 19, 2010, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.06 per common share, payable on September 1, 2010 to stockholders of record on August 10, 2010.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Accounting Standards Adopted in the Six Months Ended July 2, 2010
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued amended guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures. The new guidance requires additional disclosures regarding fair value measurements, amends disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets, and provides clarification regarding the level of disaggregation of fair value disclosures by investment class. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for certain Level 3 activity disclosure requirements that will be effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. Accordingly, we adopted this amendment in the quarter ended April 2, 2010, except for the additional Level 3 requirements which will be adopted in 2011. See Note 15 — Fair Value of Financial Instruments to our consolidated financial statements.
Subsequent Events
In February 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance on subsequent events. Under this amended guidance, SEC filers are no longer required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in originally issued and revised financial statements. This guidance was effective immediately and we adopted this new guidance in the quarter ended April 2, 2010. See Note 16 — Subsequent Event to our consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
While we are exposed to interest rate fluctuations in many of the world’s leading industrialized countries, our interest income and expense is most sensitive to fluctuations in the general level of U.S. interest rates. Our investment strategy is focused on preservation of capital and supporting our liquidity requirements. Our exposure to market risk as a result of changes in interest rates relates primarily to our cash and cash equivalents, certain interest-rate sensitive assets held under the NQDC Plan and our long-term credit facility. Our NQDC Plan assets include holdings of various issuers, types and maturity dates.
The market value of these investments on any given day during the investment term may vary as a result of market interest rate fluctuations. A hypothetical 10% movement in interest rates during the investment term would not likely have a material impact on the fair value of the portfolio. The actual impact on the fair value of the portfolio in the future may differ materially from this analysis, depending on actual balances and changes in the timing and the amount of interest rate movements.
Our consolidated operating results are affected by, among other factors, interest income on our cash equivalents. If the interest rate declines, our consolidated operating results may be negatively impacted.
In addition to our cash flows from operations, we derive our liquidity from our long-term credit facility (the “Facility”). Our total borrowings under the Facility as of July 2, 2010 were $500 million. Borrowings under this Facility bear a variable interest rate at either a Eurodollar rate (“LIBOR”) or a Prime rate, at our option, plus an applicable margin based upon certain financial ratios, determined and payable quarterly. The interest rate as of July 2, 2010 was LIBOR plus 0.35%. In addition, we pay a facility fee on the entire Facility. This facility fee varies with certain financial ratios and was 0.10% as of July 2, 2010.
Our consolidated operating results and cash flows are exposed to changes in interest rates that could adversely affect the amount of interest expense incurred and paid on the Facility in any given period. Due to the variable interest rate on the Facility, the fair value of the Facility would not likely be materially affected by any future changes in interest rates.

 

25


Table of Contents

Equity Price Risk
We are exposed to equity price risk inherent in the marketable equity securities held in our NQDC Plan. A hypothetical 10% adverse change in the stock prices of these equity securities would not result in a material impact on our consolidated financial position, operating results or cash flows.
Foreign Currency Risk
We have international operations and incur expenditures in currencies other than U.S. dollars. To date, our exposure to exchange rate volatility, resulting from foreign currency transaction gains and losses and remeasurement of local currency assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars, has been insignificant. If foreign currency rates were to fluctuate by 10% from rates in effect at July 2, 2010, the resulting transaction gains or losses and the effects of remeasurement would not materially affect our consolidated financial position, operating results or cash flows.
ITEM 4: Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as amended, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Evaluation Date”).
The purpose of this evaluation was to determine if, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were designed and operating effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information relating to Altera, required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act filings (i) was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) was accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Based on the evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a - 15(f) and 15(d) — 15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this quarterly report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitation on Effectiveness of Controls
It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met. The design of any control system is based, in part, upon the benefits of the control system relative to its costs. Control systems can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. In addition, over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1: Legal Proceedings
This information is included in Note 10 — Commitments and Contingencies to our consolidated financial statements in Item 1 and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

26


Table of Contents

ITEM 1A: Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously described under Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. For additional information regarding risk factors, please refer to the description of the risk factors associated with our business previously disclosed in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Before you decide to buy, hold, or sell our common stock, you should carefully consider the risks described in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the other information contained elsewhere in this report. These risks are not the only risks facing our company. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also affect our business. Our business, consolidated operating results and financial position could be seriously harmed if any of the events underlying any of these risks or uncertainties actually occurs. In that event, the market price for our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
ITEM 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Items 2(a) and 2(b) are inapplicable.
2(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Except for the shares tendered by employees to satisfy minimum statutory withholding requirements on employee stock award transactions, we did not repurchase any of our common stock during the six months ended July 2, 2010. Since the inception of our stock repurchase program in 1996 through July 2, 2010, our board of directors has authorized 193.0 million shares for repurchase and we have repurchased a total of 178.3 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $3.7 billion. All shares were retired upon acquisition. As of July 2, 2010, 14.7 million shares remained authorized for repurchase under our stock repurchase program. No existing repurchase plans or programs expired, nor have we decided to terminate any repurchase plans or programs prior to expiration. There are no existing plans or programs under which we intend to make further purchases.

 

27


Table of Contents

ITEM 6: Exhibits
     
Exhibit No.   Description
   
 
#10.2+  
Altera Corporation 1987 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated May 6, 2010.
   
 
#10.20+  
Altera Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 6, 2010
   
 
#31.1  
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
   
 
#31.2  
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
   
 
#32.1  
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
 
#32.2  
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
 
#101.INS  
XBRL Instance Document.
   
 
#101.SCH  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
   
 
#101.CAL  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
   
 
#101.LAB  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
   
 
#101.PRE  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
   
 
#101.DEF  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
 
     
#  
Filed herewith.
 
+  
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 6 thereof.

 

28


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  ALTERA CORPORATION
 
 
  By:   /s/ RONALD J. PASEK    
    Ronald J. Pasek   
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
 

 

29


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX
     
Exhibit No.   Description
   
 
#10.2+  
Altera Corporation 1987 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated May 6, 2010.
   
 
#10.20+  
Altera Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 6, 2010.
   
 
#31.1  
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
   
 
#31.2  
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
   
 
#32.1  
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
 
#32.2  
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
 
#101.INS  
XBRL Instance Document.
   
 
#101.SCH  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
   
 
#101.CAL  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
   
 
#101.LAB  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
   
 
#101.PRE  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
   
 
#101.DEF  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
 
     
#  
Filed herewith.
 
+  
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 6 thereof.

 

30