Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - COMARCO INC | a56453exv32w1.htm |
EX-10.3 - EX-10.3 - COMARCO INC | a56453exv10w3.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - COMARCO INC | a56453exv31w2.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - COMARCO INC | a56453exv31w1.htm |
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - COMARCO INC | a56453exv32w2.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended APRIL 30, 2010
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _______________ to _______________
Commission file number 0-5449
COMARCO, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California | 95-2088894 | |
(State or other jurisdiction | (I.R.S. Employer | |
of incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
25541 Commercentre Drive, Lake Forest, California 92630
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(949) 599-7400
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
The registrant had 7,326,569 shares of common stock outstanding as of June 3, 2010.
COMARCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
COMARCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share amounts)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share amounts)
April 30, | January 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 (A) | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current Assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 8,984 | $ | 10,127 | ||||
Accounts receivable due from customers and suppliers, net of
reserves of $153 and $136 |
11,372 | 11,489 | ||||||
Inventory, net of reserves of $1,617 and $1,650 |
1,180 | 935 | ||||||
Other current assets |
527 | 280 | ||||||
Total current assets |
22,063 | 22,831 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
950 | 1,072 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 23,013 | $ | 23,903 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current Liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 1,641 | $ | 1,134 | ||||
Accrued liabilities |
11,525 | 12,212 | ||||||
Line of credit |
1,000 | 1,000 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
14,166 | 14,346 | ||||||
Tax liability |
33 | 33 | ||||||
Deferred rent, net of current portion |
32 | 63 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 14,231 | $ | 14,442 | ||||
Commitments and Contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders Equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized;
no shares issued or outstanding at April 30, 2010 and
January 31, 2010, respectively |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $0.10 par value, 50,625,000 shares
authorized; 7,326,569 shares issued and outstanding at
April 30, 2010 and January 31, 2010, respectively |
733 | 733 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
15,022 | 14,967 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(6,973 | ) | (6,239 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
8,782 | 9,461 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 23,013 | $ | 23,903 | ||||
(A) | Derived from the audited consolidated financial statements as of January 31, 2010. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
COMARCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
April 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Revenue |
$ | 7,514 | $ | 2,022 | ||||
Cost of revenue |
5,912 | 2,336 | ||||||
Gross profit (loss) |
1,602 | (314 | ) | |||||
Selling, general, and administrative expenses |
1,407 | 1,686 | ||||||
Engineering and support expenses |
902 | 870 | ||||||
2,309 | 2,556 | |||||||
Operating loss |
(707 | ) | (2,870 | ) | ||||
Other expense, net |
(19 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
(726 | ) | (2,880 | ) | ||||
Income tax benefit |
| | ||||||
Net loss from continuing operations |
(726 | ) | (2,880 | ) | ||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
(8 | ) | 39 | |||||
Net loss |
$ | (734 | ) | $ | (2,841 | ) | ||
Basic and diluted loss per share: |
||||||||
Net loss from continuing operations |
$ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.39 | ) | ||
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations |
| | ||||||
$ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.39 | ) | |||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
7,327 | 7,327 | ||||||
Diluted |
7,327 | 7,327 | ||||||
Common shares outstanding |
7,327 | 7,327 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
COMARCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
April 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net loss from continuing operations |
$ | (726 | ) | $ | (2,880 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss from continuing operations to
net cash used in operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation |
193 | 199 | ||||||
Loss on sale/retirement of property and equipment |
| 6 | ||||||
Stock based compensation expense |
55 | 66 | ||||||
Loan origination fees |
14 | 43 | ||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
17 | | ||||||
Provision for obsolete inventory |
(33 | ) | 16 | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable due from customers and suppliers |
100 | 1,900 | ||||||
Inventory |
(212 | ) | 528 | |||||
Other assets |
(205 | ) | 277 | |||||
Accounts payable |
507 | (455 | ) | |||||
Deferred rent |
(31 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||
Accrued liabilities |
(687 | ) | (1,236 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in continuing operating activities |
(1,008 | ) | (1,565 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operating activities |
(8 | ) | 39 | |||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(1,016 | ) | (1,526 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(71 | ) | (58 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in continuing investing activities |
(71 | ) | (58 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Loan origination fees |
(56 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(56 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(1,143 | ) | (1,627 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
10,127 | 14,144 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 8,984 | $ | 12,517 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 14 | $ | | ||||
Cash paid for income taxes |
$ | 2 | $ | 14 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
COMARCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. Organization
Comarco, Inc., through its subsidiary Comarco Wireless Technologies, Inc. (collectively, we,
Comarco, or the Company), is a leading designer of external mobile power adapters used to power
and charge notebook computers, mobile phones, BlackBerry® smartphones, iPods®, and many other
portable, rechargeable handheld devices. Our operations consist solely of the operations of Comarco
Wireless Technologies, Inc. (CWT), which was incorporated in the State of Delaware in September
1993. Comarco, Inc. is a California corporation.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Future Operations, Liquidity and Capital Resources:
The Company has experienced substantial pre-tax losses from operations for the first fiscal
quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010 totaling $0.7 million and $2.9 million, respectively. Further,
during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company recorded an accrual of $4.6 million related
to a product safety recall (the Recall). In addition, the Company did not generate a positive
gross margin on the sale of its ChargeSource® products until the second quarter of fiscal 2010. The
Companys future is highly dependent on its ability to return to, and sustain, overall
profitability. To accomplish this, the Company must increase the sales volumes of its current and
newly designed ChargeSource® products. The Company believes that it has begun to address this
concern with its Strategic Product Development and Supply Agreement (the Targus Agreement) with
Targus Group International, Inc., (Targus) dated March 16, 2009, pursuant to which the Company
began shipment of ChargeSource® products to Targus during the second quarter of fiscal 2010.
Further, the Company continually negotiates with its contract manufacturers and other suppliers in
its efforts to reduce its unit costs. Although certain cost reductions have been achieved, the
Company continues to vigilantly compare component prices and availability among approved vendors in
its efforts to achieve profitability objectives, as the pricing, availability and sourcing of
components remain challenging as can be the case with many technology products. The inability of
the Company to successfully achieve these objectives will have a material adverse effect on the
Companys operations and financial condition.
The Company had working capital totaling approximately $7.9 million at April 30, 2010.
Management of the Company believes that the Companys available capital resources, including the
Companys existing credit facility, will be sufficient to meet the Companys expected working
capital and capital expenditure requirements as the Companys business is currently conducted for
at least the next 12 months, assuming the Company is successful in obtaining the necessary waivers
or amendments to its existing credit facility. As the Company executes on its current strategy,
however, it may require further debt and/or equity capital to fund its working capital needs. The
current U.S. capital markets remain relatively illiquid and the inability to access these funds
when needed could have a material adverse effect on the Companys operations and financial
condition.
Basis of Presentation:
The interim condensed consolidated financial statements of Comarco included herein have been
prepared without audit in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America for interim information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by
generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. The Company believes
that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading when read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Companys annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2010. The unaudited interim condensed
consolidated financial information presented herein reflects all adjustments, consisting only of
normal recurring accruals, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair
presentation of the consolidated results for the interim periods presented. The consolidated
results for the three months ended April 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to
be expected for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2011.
6
Table of Contents
COMARCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
Cash and Cash Equivalents
All highly liquid investments with remaining maturity dates of three months or less when
acquired are classified as cash and cash equivalents. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents
approximates the amounts shown in the condensed consolidated financial statements. Cash and cash
equivalents are generally maintained in uninsured accounts, typically Eurodollar deposits with
daily liquidity, which are subject to investment risk including possible loss of principal
invested.
Principles of Consolidation:
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company include the
accounts of Comarco, Inc. and CWT. All material intercompany balances, transactions, and profits
and losses have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates:
The preparation of unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the unaudited interim condensed
consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
period reported. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.
Certain accounting principles require subjective and complex judgments to be used in the
preparation of financial statements. Accordingly, a different financial presentation could result
depending on the judgments, estimates, or assumptions that are used. Such estimates and assumptions
include, but are not specifically limited to, those required in the valuation of long-lived assets,
allowance for doubtful accounts, reserves for inventory obsolescence, reserves for estimated
warranty costs, including product recall costs, valuation allowances for deferred tax assets, and
determination of stock based compensation.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company recorded an accrual of $4.6 million
related the Recall announced during the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The Companys methodology for
estimating the recall costs involved estimating future costs to be incurred to replace the recalled
adapters based on expected returns and the costs to conduct the Recall, particularly communication,
replacement, and transportations costs. The Companys replacement and transportation cost
estimates include costs for component parts and labor; the Company also obtained third party cost
quotes for communication, fulfillment and administration services. The Companys current
assumption is that approximately 10 percent of total units sold which are impacted by the Recall
will be replaced and all of the units in the distribution channel will be replaced. To help
understand the relative impact of the return rate assumption, a 10 percentage point increase in the
return rate would increase the estimated recall costs by approximately $1.2 million. The Company
expects that its cash outlays associated with this product safety recall to be financed from its
existing cash balances and credit facility. However, the Companys estimate for the costs of the
Recall may be less than the actual costs incurred which would have a material adverse effect on the
Companys operations and financial condition.
Reclassifications:
Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments:
The Companys financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable due
from customers and suppliers, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and a line of credit. The
carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable due from customers and suppliers,
accounts payable, and accrued liabilities are considered to be representative of their respective
fair values because of the short-term nature of those instruments. The
7
Table of Contents
COMARCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
carrying amount of the
Companys line of credit approximates fair value since the interest rate approximates the market
rate for debt securities with similar terms and risk characteristics.
3. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company grants stock options for a fixed number of shares to employees with an exercise
price equal to the fair value of the shares at the date of grant.
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation using the modified prospective method, which
requires measurement of compensation cost for all stock awards at fair value on date of grant and
recognition of compensation over the service period for awards expected to vest. The fair value of
stock options is determined using a Lattice Binomial model for options with performance-based
vesting tied to the Companys stock price and the Black-Scholes valuation model for options with
ratable term vesting. Both the Lattice Binomial and Black-Scholes valuation models require the
input of subjective assumptions. These assumptions include estimating the length of time employees
will retain their vested stock options before exercising them (the expected term), the estimated
volatility of our common stock price over the expected term, and the number of awards that will
ultimately not complete their vesting requirements (forfeitures). Changes in these subjective
assumptions can materially affect the estimate of fair value of stock-based compensation and,
consequently, the related amount recognized as an expense on the consolidated statements of
operations. As required under the accounting rules, the Company reviews its valuation assumptions
at each grant date and, as a result, is likely to change its valuation assumptions used to value
employee stock-based awards granted in future periods. The values derived from using either the
Lattice Binomial or the Black-Scholes model are recognized as expense over the vesting period, net
of estimated forfeitures. The estimation of stock awards that will ultimately vest requires
significant judgment. Actual results, and future changes in estimates, may differ from the
Companys current estimates.
The compensation expense recognized is summarized in the table below (in thousands, except per
share amounts):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
April 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense |
$ | 55 | $ | 66 | ||||
Less: Amounts reflected in discontinued operations |
| | ||||||
Compensation expense from continuing operations |
$ | 55 | $ | 66 | ||||
Impact on basic and diluted earnings per share |
0.01 | 0.01 |
The total compensation cost related to nonvested awards not yet recognized is approximately
$506,000, which will be expensed over a weighted average remaining life of 30.6 months.
For the first quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010, no stock options were granted.
Comarco, Inc. has stock-based compensation plans under which outside directors and certain
employees receive stock options. The employee stock option plans and a director stock option plan
provide that officers, key employees, and directors may be granted options to purchase up to
2,562,500 shares of common stock of the Company at not less than 100 percent of the fair market
value at the date of grant, unless the optionee is a 10 percent shareholder of the Company, in
which case the price must not be less than 110 percent of the fair market value.
The Companys Director Stock Option Plan (the Director Plan) expires in December 2010, and
the Companys former employee stock option plan (the Employee Plan) expired during May 2005.
These plans provide for 637,500 and 825,000 shares issuable, respectively. During December 2005,
the Board of Directors approved and adopted the Companys 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2005
Plan) covering 450,000 shares of common stock. The 2005 Plan
8
Table of Contents
COMARCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
was approved by the Companys
shareholders at its annual shareholders meeting in June 2006, and subsequently amended at its
annual shareholders meeting in June 2008 to increase the number of shares issuable under the plan
from 450,000 to 1,100,000 shares.
Under the 2005 Plan, the Company may grant stock options, stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock, restricted stock units, and performance based awards. Under all plans, awards
vest or become exercisable in installments
determined by the compensation committee of the Companys Board of Directors; however, no
employee option may be exercised prior to one year following the grant of the option. The options
granted under the Director Plan and the Employee Plan expire as determined by the compensation
committee, but no later than ten years and one week after the date of grant (five years for 10
percent shareholders). The options granted under the 2005 Plan expire as determined by the
committee, but no later than ten years after the date of grant (five years for 10 percent
shareholders).
Transactions and other information related to these plans for the three months ended April 30,
2010 are summarized below:
Outstanding Awards | ||||||||
Number of | Weighted-Average | |||||||
Shares | Exercise Price | |||||||
Balance, January 31, 2010 |
1,157,704 | $ | 3.85 | |||||
Options granted |
| | ||||||
Options canceled or expired |
(31,500 | ) | 23.67 | |||||
Options exercised |
| | ||||||
Balance, April 30, 2010 |
1,126,204 | $ | 3.29 | |||||
As of April 30, 2010, the stock options outstanding have an intrinsic value of $1,097,000
based on a closing market price of $2.52 per share on April 30, 2010. The following table
summarizes information about the Companys stock awards outstanding at April 30, 2010:
Awards Outstanding | Awards Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-Avg. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Range of | Number | Remaining | Weighted-Avg. | Number | Weighted-Avg. | |||||||||||||||
Exercise Prices | Outstanding | Contractual Life | Exercise Price | Exercisable | Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||
$1.09 to 4.90 |
867,704 | 7.8 | $ | 1.35 | 143,826 | $ | 1.58 | |||||||||||||
6.19 to 9.89 |
166,000 | 4.6 | 7.77 | 158,500 | 7.84 | |||||||||||||||
10.43 to 11.60 |
60,000 | 5.0 | 10.72 | 52,500 | 10.76 | |||||||||||||||
15.07 to 20.04 |
32,500 | 0.5 | 18.51 | 32,500 | 18.51 | |||||||||||||||
1,126,204 | 7.0 years | 3.29 | 387,326 | 6.81 | ||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercisable at April 30, 2010 were 387,326 at a weighted-average exercise price
of $6.81. At April 30, 2010, shares available for future grants under the 2005 Plan were 131,796
and under the director stock option plan were 625.
4. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance on subsequent events. Under this amended
guidance, SEC filers are no longer required to disclose the date through which subsequent events
have been evaluated in originally issued and revised financial statements. This guidance was
effective immediately and we adopted these new requirements upon issuance of this guidance.
9
Table of Contents
COMARCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
5. Discontinued Operations
Call Box
On July 10, 2008, the Company executed an asset purchase agreement to sell the assets of its
Call Box business for $2.7 million in cash. The transaction closed on July 10, 2008. During the
first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company recorded very minor expenses related to the discontinued
operations of the Call Box business and incurred no similar expenses during the first quarter of
fiscal 2011.
Wireless Test Solutions
The Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement on September 26, 2008 with Ascom Holding
AG (Ascom) and its subsidiary Ascom Inc. to sell the Wireless Test Solutions (WTS) business and
related assets. Comarcos shareholders approved the transaction on November 26, 2008 with
approximately 85 percent of the Companys shareholders voting in favor of the transaction. The
transaction closed on January 6, 2009.
The aggregate purchase price paid to Comarco in connection with the transaction was
$12,750,000 in cash, with $1,275,000 of the proceeds placed in escrow for one year from the closing
date as security for general indemnification rights. The proceeds placed in escrow were released
in January 2010.
Operating results of the WTS discontinued operations are as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended April 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Revenues |
$ | | $ | | ||||
Income from discontinued operations: |
||||||||
Gain on sale, net of taxes of $0 |
$ | | $ | 43 | ||||
Loss from discontinued operations, before taxes |
(8 | ) | | |||||
Income tax expense |
| | ||||||
Total income (loss) from discontinued operations |
$ | (8 | ) | $ | 43 | |||
The $43,000 incurred in fiscal 2010 relates primarily to adjustments to the acquired assets
and liabilities assumed by Ascom.
6. Loss Per Share
The Company calculates basic loss per share by dividing net loss by the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted earnings per share
reflects the effects of potentially dilutive securities. Since the Company incurred a net loss for
the three months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, basic and diluted net loss per share for both such
periods were the same because the inclusion of 290,583 and of 68,717 potentially dilutive
securities related to outstanding stock options, respectively, would have been antidilutive.
10
Table of Contents
COMARCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
7. Customer and Supplier Concentrations
A significant portion of the Companys revenue is derived from a limited number of customers.
The customers providing 10 percent or more of the Companys revenues for either quarter ended April
30, 2010 or 2009 are listed below (in thousands).
Three Months Ended April 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Total revenue |
$ | 7,514 | 100 | % | $ | 2,022 | 100 | % | ||||||||
Customer concentration: |
||||||||||||||||
Lenovo Information Products Co., Ltd. |
$ | 1,805 | 24 | % | $ | 2,006 | 99 | % | ||||||||
Targus Group International, Inc. |
5,638 | 75 | % | | | |||||||||||
$ | 7,443 | 99 | % | $ | 2,006 | 99 | % | |||||||||
The Companys revenues by geographic area, as determined by the ship to address, consisted
of the following (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
April 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
North America |
$ | 5,597 | $ | 41 | ||||
Europe |
55 | 9 | ||||||
Asia |
1,862 | 1,972 | ||||||
$ | 7,514 | $ | 2,022 | |||||
The customers and suppliers comprising 10 percent or more of the Companys gross accounts
receivable due from customers and suppliers at either April 30, 2010 or January 31, 2010 are listed
below (in thousands).
April 30, 2010 | January 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Total gross accounts receivable due
from customers and suppliers |
$ | 11,525 | 100 | % | $ | 11,625 | 100 | % | ||||||||
Customer concentration: |
||||||||||||||||
Eurostyle Corporation |
$ | 1,485 | 13 | % | $ | | | |||||||||
Lenovo Information Products Co., Ltd. |
1,836 | 16 | % | 2,730 | 24 | % | ||||||||||
Targus Group International, Inc. |
7,643 | 66 | % | 7,917 | 68 | % | ||||||||||
$ | 10,964 | 95 | % | $ | 10,647 | 92 | % | |||||||||
On March 16, 2009, the Company entered into the Targus Agreement with Targus. Under the Targus
Agreement, Comarco will sell certain current and future mobile power supply products exclusively to
Targus, and Targus will purchase such products and any products substantially similar to such
products exclusively from Comarco; provided, however, that the Targus Agreement does not prohibit
Comarco from selling any mobile power supply products covered by the Targus Agreement to original
equipment manufacturers that sell such products under their own name as long as
such products do not incorporate any intellectual property of Targus. The Company began
shipments to Targus under this agreement during the second quarter of fiscal 2010.
Eurostyle Corporation is an affiliate of Edac Power Electronics Co. Ltd., and has been both a
supplier and a customer, as oftentimes we are able to source components locally that we later sell
to our contract manufacturers and
11
Table of Contents
COMARCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
other suppliers who build the finished goods. This is especially
the case when new products are initially introduced into production. Sales to our contract
manufacturers are excluded from revenue and are recorded as a reduction to cost of revenue. At
April 30, 2010 and January 31, 2010, approximately $1.8 million and $0.8 million, respectively, of
the Companys accounts receivable due from customers and suppliers were due from various suppliers.
A significant portion of our inventory purchases is derived from a limited number of contract
manufacturers and other suppliers. The loss of one or more of our significant suppliers could
adversely affect our operations. During the three months ended April 30, 2010, Edac Power
Electronics Co. Ltd., Flextronics Electronics and Chicony Power Technology Co. Ltd collectively
provided $4.9 million, or 98 percent, of the total product costs of $5.0 million recorded in cost
of revenue. For the three months ended April 30, 2009, Flextronics Electronics provided $1.1
million or 68 percent of total product costs of $1.6 million recorded in cost of revenue.
At April 30, 2010 and January 31, 2010, approximately $276,000 or 17 percent and $534,000 or
47 percent, respectively, of the Companys accounts payable of $1.6 million and $1.1 million,
respectively, was payable to Flextronics Electronics. Additionally at April 30, 2010 and January
31, 2010, approximately $323,000 or 20 percent and $266,000 or 24 percent, respectively of the
Companys accounts payable was payable to Chicony Power Technology Co. Ltd.
Additionally, at April 30, 2010, approximately $4.4 million or 77 percent of total uninvoiced
materials and services of $5.7 million, included in accrued liabilities were payable to Chicony
Power Technology, Co. Ltd., Flextronics Electronics and Edac Power Electronics Co. Ltd. At January
31, 2010 approximately $5.0 million or 92 percent of total uninvoiced materials and services of
$5.4 million, included in accrued liabilities were payable to Chicony Power Technology, Co. Ltd.,
Flextronics Electronics and Edac Power Electronics Co. Ltd.
8. Inventory
Inventory, net of reserves, consists of the following (in thousands):
April 30, | January 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 202 | $ | 574 | ||||
Finished goods |
978 | 361 | ||||||
$ | 1,180 | $ | 935 | |||||
As of April 30, 2010 and January 31, 2010, approximately $91,000 and $208,000 of total
inventory, respectively, was located at our corporate headquarters. Additionally, as of April 30,
2010, approximately $0.6 million of finished goods relates to recall returns that are currently
being reworked at a local contract manufacturer. The remaining balances as of April 30, 2010 and
January 31, 2010 were located at various contract manufacturer locations in China.
9. Warranty Arrangements
The Company records an accrual for estimated warranty costs as products are sold. These
amounts are recorded in accrued liabilities in the unaudited interim condensed consolidated balance
sheets. Warranty costs are estimated based on periodic analysis of historical experience. Changes
in the estimated warranty accruals are recorded when the change in estimate is identified. During
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company recorded an accrual of $4.6 million related to the
Recall announced on April 30, 2010. Approximately 500,000 Targus branded 90-watt universal AC power
adapters for laptops are affected by the Recall. A summary of the warranty accrual activity is
shown in the table below (in thousands):
12
Table of Contents
COMARCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
April 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 4,759 | $ | 86 | ||||
Accruals for warranties issued during the period |
105 | 20 | ||||||
Utilization |
(433 | ) | (36 | ) | ||||
$ | 4,431 | $ | 70 | |||||
The Company believes that the balance remaining as of April 30, 2010 is adequate to cover
additional product recall costs expected to be incurred as well as standard warranty costs.
However, actual amounts incurred as a result of the Recall may differ materially from the amounts
in the reserves the Company established as a result of the Recall. Actual amounts may differ
materially from the Companys current estimates based on many factors, including the number of
qualifying 90-watt universal power adapters returned to Comarco by Targus and their customers,
primarily consumer electronics retailers and end-user consumers in connection with the Recall.
10. Loan Agreement
On February 11, 2009, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the Loan
Agreement) with Silicon Valley Bank (SVB). The credit facility was renewed on February 9, 2010
and matures, on February 10, 2011, at which time, any outstanding principal balance is payable in
full.
Under the Loan Agreement, the Company may borrow up to (a) the lesser of (i) $10,000,000 or
(ii) 80 percent of the Companys eligible accounts receivable minus (b) the amount of any
outstanding principal balance of any advances made by SVB under the Loan Agreement. The Company
must maintain a quick ratio of 1.5 to 1.0 as its primary financial covenant and must also comply
with certain reporting covenants. As of April 30, 2010, the Company has borrowed $1,000,000 under
the Loan Agreement. Additionally, under this Loan Agreement, the Company has one letter of credit
outstanding in the amount of $77,000. The Companys obligations under the Loan Agreement are
secured by a first priority perfected security interest in Borrowers assets, including
intellectual property. Amounts borrowed under the Loan Agreement bear interest at a floating per
annum rate equal to 1.5% above SVBs prime rate or, for any period in which we have failed to
maintain a quick ratio of 2.0 to 1.0 and for a period of three months following the cure thereof,
2.5% above SVBs prime rate; provided that the interest rate in effect on any day shall not be less
than 5.5% per annum. For any period in which we have failed to maintain the quick ratio threshold,
we will be subject to a monthly collateral monitoring fee of $1,000.
As of April 30, 2010, the Companys quick ratio was 1.43 to 1.0, which was below the quick
ratio of 1.5 to 1.0 required by the Loan Agreement. As a result, an event of default has occurred
under the Loan Agreement and on June 11, 2010, the Company and SVB entered into a Forbearance to
Loan and Security Agreement (the Forbearance). Pursuant to the Forbearance, SVB agreed that, so
long as no event of default under the Loan Agreement exists other than the Companys violation of
the quick ratio covenant for the months of April and May 2010, SVB shall not exercise its rights
against the Company until after July 15, 2010, the date at which the May 2010 quick ratio
calculation is due to be reported to SVB.
11. Commitments and Contingencies
Purchase Commitments with Suppliers
The Company generally issues purchase orders to its suppliers with delivery dates from four to
six weeks from the purchase order date. In addition, the Company regularly provides significant
suppliers with rolling six-month forecasts of material and finished goods requirements for planning
and long-lead time parts procurement purposes only. The Company is committed to accepting delivery
of materials pursuant to its purchase orders subject to various contract provisions that allow it
to delay receipt of such order or allow it to cancel orders beyond certain agreed lead times. Such
13
Table of Contents
COMARCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
cancellations may or may not include cancellation costs payable by the Company. In the past, the
Company has been required to take delivery of materials from its suppliers that were in excess of
its requirements and the Company has previously recognized charges and expenses related to such
excess material. If the Company is unable to adequately
manage its suppliers and adjust such commitments for changes in demand, it may incur
additional inventory expenses related to excess and obsolete inventory. Such expenses could have a
material adverse effect on the Companys business, consolidated results of operations, and
financial position.
Executive Severance Commitments
The Company has severance compensation and employment agreements with certain key executives.
These agreements require the Company to pay these executives, in the event of certain terminations
of employment following a change of control of the Company, up to the amount of one and a half
times their then current annual base salary and the amount of any bonus amount the executive would
have achieved for the year in which the termination occurs plus the acceleration of unvested
options. The exact amount of this contingent obligation is not known and accordingly has not been
recorded in the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
Letter of Credit
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company obtained a $77,000 letter of credit from
SVB to allow for continuous and unlapsed compliance with a lease provision for the Companys
corporate offices. The letter of credit from SVB is treated as a reduction in available borrowings
available to the Company under the Loan Agreement.
Legal Contingencies
On July 15, 2009, a former officer and employee of the Company filed a demand for arbitration
against the Company with the American Arbitration Association claiming that he is entitled to a
payment pursuant to the terms of a written Severance Compensation Agreement as well as
reimbursement for his attorneys fees relating to this claim. The Severance Compensation Agreement
provides that in the event the employee is terminated by the Company without Cause (as defined in
such agreement), or ceases to be employed by the Company for reasons other than because of death,
disability, retirement or Cause, or the employee terminates his employment with us for Good
Reason (as defined in such agreement), in each case, within 24 months following a Change of
Control (as defined in such agreement), the employee would be entitled to receive a lump sum cash
payment equal to the sum of his annual base salary plus his annual incentive compensation bonus
that would be payable assuming 100 percent satisfaction of all performance goals. The former
officer and employee claims that the Companys January 2009 sale of its WTS business to Ascom
and/or a change in the composition of the Board of Directors of the Company constituted a Change of
Control and that he is entitled to the specified payment because he ceased to be employed by the
Company as a result of such transaction, although his employment was assumed by Ascom in
essentially the same capacity following the consummation of the transaction. The Company denies
that a Change of Control occurred and contends that the former employee is not entitled to any
payment pursuant to the Severance Compensation Agreement. Arbitration for this matter is
scheduled for September 28, 2010. The outcome of this matter is neither determinable nor estimable
as of the date of filing this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and accordingly no provision has been
recorded on the unaudited interim condensed consolidated balance sheet at April 30, 2010.
In addition to the pending matter described above, the Company is from time to time involved
in various legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of its business. The Company believes that
the outcome of all such legal proceedings will not in the aggregate have a material adverse effect
on its consolidated results of operations and financial position.
14
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited
interim condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other financial
information appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report, including the following discussion and analysis, contains forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Words such as expects, anticipates, intends, plans,
believes, seeks, and estimates, and similar expressions or variations of such words are
intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not deemed to represent an all-inclusive
means of identifying forward-looking statements included in this report. Additionally, statements
concerning future matters are forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements reflect current views about our plans, strategies, and
prospects, but can only be based on facts and factors currently known by us. Consequently,
forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results
and outcomes may differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed in or anticipated by the
forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements in this report include those related to our objectives; our
products and the availability of future products; our sales, revenues, and costs; the timing of
fulfillment of purchase orders and completion of projects; demand for our products; the sufficiency
of our cash and cash equivalent balances; and expected positive cash flow. Many important factors
may cause the Companys actual results to differ materially from those discussed in any such
forward-looking statements, including but not limited to the impact of general economic and retail
uncertainty and perceived or actual weakening of economic conditions on customers and prospective
customers spending on our products; quarterly and seasonal fluctuations in our revenue or other
operating results; fluctuations in the demand for our products and the fact that a significant
portion of our revenue is derived from a limited number of customers; additional costs which might
be incurred related to our previously announced product recall beyond the reserves established for
the recall; unexpected difficulties and delays associated with our efforts to obtain cost
reductions and achieve higher sales volumes for our ChargeSource® products; failure to accurately
forecast customer demand and the risk that our customers may cancel their orders, change production
quantities or delay production; the fact that our products are complex and have short life cycles
and the average selling prices of our products will likely decrease over their sales cycles;
disruptions in our relationships with our suppliers; failure to meet financial expectations of
analysts and investors, including failure from significant reductions in demand from earlier
anticipated levels; risks related to market acceptance of our products and our ability to meet
contractual and technical commitments with our customers; activities by us and others regarding
protection of intellectual property; competitors release of competitive products and other
actions; and costs and potential adverse determinations arising out of adverse proceedings or
litigation. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are
reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate and, therefore, we cannot assure that the
results contemplated in forward-looking statements will be realized in the timeframe anticipated or
at all. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking information
included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us
or any other person that our objectives or plans will be achieved. Accordingly, investors are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation
to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
In addition to the risks, uncertainties, and other factors discussed elsewhere in this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q, the risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause or
contribute to actual results differing materially from those expressed or implied in any
forward-looking statements include, without limitation, those set forth under Part I, Item 1A Risk
Factors in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010
filed with the SEC, as such risk factors are supplemented and amended in this Form 10-Q under Part
II, Item
1.A. below, those contained in the Companys other filings with the SEC, and those set forth
above. For these forward-looking statements,
15
Table of Contents
we claim the protection of the safe harbor for
forward-looking statements in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Basis of Presentation
The financial information presented in this report is not audited and is not necessarily
indicative of our future consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flow. Our
fiscal year ends on January 31 and our fiscal quarters end on April 30, July 31, and October 31.
Unless otherwise stated, all dates refer to our fiscal year and fiscal periods.
Executive Summary
Comarco, Inc., through its subsidiary Comarco Wireless Technologies, Inc. (collectively, we,
Comarco, or the Company), is a leading designer of external mobile power adapters used to power
and charge notebook computers, cellular telephones, BlackBerry® smartphones, iPods®, and other
portable, rechargeable handheld devices. Our operations consist solely of the operations of Comarco
Wireless Technologies, Inc. (CWT).
In addition to the risks, uncertainties and factors discussed elsewhere in this quarterly
report on Form 10-Q and in the Companys other filings with the SEC, management currently considers
the following additional trends, events, and uncertainties to be important to understanding our
results of operations for the quarter ended April 30, 2010:
| On April 30, 2010, the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced a product safety recall (the Recall) concerning approximately 500,000 units of our ChargeSource 90-watt universal AC power adapter sold to our distributer, Targus Group International, Inc. (Targus) from June 2009 through March 2010. We estimate that approximately 400,000 of the affected units are in the hands of consumers and the remaining affected units are currently in the distribution channel. We have established a recall website and hotline to enable consumers to determine if they have a unit subject to the Recall. We have established a process to replace and repair the affected units. Due to the Recall, we accrued a $4.0 million charge to cost of revenue in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 as an estimate of the cost to replace the affected units and $0.6 million related to selling, general and administrative costs expected to be incurred related to the Recall. Actual amounts may differ materially from our current estimates based on many factors, including the number of qualifying 90-watt universal power adapters returned to Comarco by Targus and their customers, primarily consumer electronics retailers and end-user consumers in connection with the Recall. Also, the estimate is based on Comarcos assessment of Targus and Comarcos respective obligations regarding returned product. As of the filing date of this report, Targus and Comarco have not reached full agreement with respect to such matters and adverse developments with respect to such matters could materially increase the costs of the Recall to Comarco. | ||
Comarcos revenue for the three months ended April 30, 2010, from the sale of its legacy or Bronx product significantly declined from prior periods. As Comarco continues to transition from Bronx sales to sales of its new Slim and Light or Manhattan product, Comarco anticipates that future revenue from the Bronx product will be modest. | |||
In an abundance of caution, during the later part of the first quarter of fiscal 2011, Comarco ceased production of its Manhattan product to allow it time to verify that the product did not contain defects similar to the one which caused the Recall. Comarco successfully completed its verification process and resumed manufacturing and volume shipping Manhattan units late in the first quarter. As a result of the temporary cessation of manufacturing of Manhattan products and the significant decline in Bronx sales which occurred during the first quarter of fiscal 2011, Comarcos sales to Targus for the three months ended April 30, 2010 were adversely affected. On a sequential basis, sales to Targus for the three months ended April 30, 2010 decreased $1.0 million to $5.6 million compared to $6.6 million for the three months ended January 31, 2010. |
16
Table of Contents
As a result of the Recall, many important factors, risks and uncertainties may cause us to incur costs in excess of the reserves we established as a result of the Recall, and in addition, may negatively impact our business and results of operations, including, but not limited to: the assumptions underlying our estimates concerning the costs and expenses that we expect to incur as a result of the Recall may turn out to be incorrect and we may incur costs and expenses beyond such estimates; the possibility that costs and expenses may result from litigation, arbitration or other adverse proceedings related to the Recall; the risk that demand or orders for our products may be adversely impacted by the Recall; the risk that our key customers may cancel orders, change order quantities or delay order delivery dates as a result of the Recall or otherwise; reputational harm which may result from the Recall; the fact that we rely on a limited number of contract manufacturers and component suppliers and delays or disruptions in their production of our products or in the components that go into such products would adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition; and other factors, including factors outside of our control. | |||
| On June 30, 2009, we announced that we were selected by Dell Inc. to provide an innovative 90 watt DC adapter for use in automobiles and airplanes. We began shipping this product in the latter part of May 2010. | ||
| Revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 increased to $7.5 million compared to $2.0 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The increase is attributable to shipments to Targus under the Strategic Product Development and Supply Agreement (the Targus Agreement). Approximately 75 percent of our revenue during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was from sales to Targus and we expect that Targus will continue to represent a large percentage of our future revenue. Any adverse change in our relationship with Targus, as a result of the Recall or any other reason, or significant reduction, cancellation or delay in purchases by Targus or our other key customers, would adversely impact our revenues, business and results of operations. | ||
| We have a history of net operating losses and our future is dependent upon our ability to return to, and sustain, overall profitability. To accomplish this, the Company must increase the sales volumes of its current and newly designed ChargeSource® products. Further, the Company continually negotiates with its contract manufacturers and other suppliers in its efforts to reduce its unit costs. Although certain cost reductions have been achieved, the Company continues to vigilantly compare component prices and availability among approved vendors in its efforts to achieve profitability objectives, as the pricing, availability and sourcing of components remain challenging as can be the case with many technology products. If we fail to achieve cost reductions and higher sales volumes for our products, we may not achieve or sustain profitability and our results of operations and prospects would be adversely impacted. | ||
| On February 9, 2010 we entered into an amendment to our Loan and Security Agreement (as amended, the Loan Agreement) with Silicon Valley Bank (SVB). As of April 30, 2010 our quick ratio was 1.43 to 1.0, which was below the quick ratio of 1.5 to 1.0 required by the Loan Agreement for the month ended April 30, 2010. As a result, an event of default has occurred under the Loan Agreement and on June 11, 2010, we and SVB entered into a Forbearance to Loan and Security Agreement (the Forbearance). Pursuant to the Forbearance, SVB agreed that, so long as no event of default under the Loan Agreement exists other than our violation of the quick ratio covenant financial covenant for the months of April and May of 2010, SVB shall not exercise its rights against us until after July 15, 2010, the date at which the May 2010 quick ratio calculation is due to be reported to SVB. Our management is scheduled to meet with representatives of SVB after the date of this filing and prior to the end of June 2010 to discuss the possibility of obtaining a waiver with respect to this covenant default and/or the possibility of amending or otherwise revising the covenant in the Loan Agreement. There are no assurances that this meeting will result in our obtaining the requested waiver or other amendment or revision to the Loan Agreement. See below for further information. |
17
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based
upon our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The
preparation of these unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenue, and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it
believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. The results of these estimates form the basis
for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ materially from our estimates.
An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made
based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and
if different estimates that reasonably could have been used or changes in the accounting estimate
that are reasonably likely to occur could materially change the financial statements. Management
believes there have been no significant changes during the three months ended April 30, 2010 to the
items that we disclosed as our critical accounting policies and estimates in Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our annual report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010.
Results of Operations
The following tables set forth certain items as a percentage of revenue from our unaudited
interim condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended April 30, 2010
and 2009:
Revenue
Three Months Ended April 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
% of | % of | 2010 over 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | Revenue | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 7,514 | 100 | % | $ | 2,022 | 100 | % | 272 | % | ||||||||||
Operating loss |
$ | (707 | ) | $ | (2,870 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
$ | (726 | ) | $ | (2,880 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Revenue by Geographic Region
Three Months Ended April 30, | 2010 over 2009 | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % Change | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 5,597 | $ | 41 | 13,551 | % | ||||||
Europe |
55 | 9 | 511 | % | ||||||||
Asia |
1,862 | 1,972 | (6 | %) | ||||||||
$ | 7,514 | $ | 2,022 | 272 | % | |||||||
18
Table of Contents
Revenue by Customer
Three Months Ended April 30, | 2010 over 2009 | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % Change | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||
Lenovo |
$ | 1,805 | $ | 2,006 | (10 | %) | ||||||
Targus |
5,638 | | | |||||||||
Other |
71 | 16 | 344 | % | ||||||||
$ | 7,514 | $ | 2,022 | 272 | % | |||||||
Revenue
The increase in revenue of $5.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared with the
first quarter of fiscal 2010 is attributable to shipments to Targus under the Targus Agreement.
Revenue from shipments to Lenovo decreased $0.2 million or 10 percent in the first quarter of
fiscal 2011 compared to the corresponding prior year period.
Cost of Revenue and Gross Margin
Three Months Ended April 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
% of | % of | 2010 over 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total | Total | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Product costs |
$ | 5,002 | 85 | % | $ | 1,619 | 69 | % | 209 | % | ||||||||||
Fixed supply chain overhead |
796 | 13 | % | 605 | 26 | % | 32 | % | ||||||||||||
Inventory reserve and
scrap charges |
| | 112 | 5 | % | (100 | %) | |||||||||||||
Freight, expedite, and
other charges |
114 | 2 | % | | | 100 | % | |||||||||||||
$ | 5,912 | 100 | % | $ | 2,336 | 100 | % | 153 | % | |||||||||||
Three Months Ended April 30, | 2010 over 2009 | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | ppt Change | ||||||||||
Gross margin |
21 | % | (16 | %) | 37 |
The first quarter of fiscal 2011 increase in cost of revenue of $3.6 million compared to the
first quarter of fiscal 2010 was primarily attributable to the 272 percent increase in revenue
compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, our fixed
supply chain overhead increased by $0.2 million or 32 percent. This increase is due to additional
personnel needed to assist with procurement of component inventory that has become increasingly
difficult to source at our desired prices and within our desired lead times. We also have added
staff to assist with the management of our growing number of contract manufacturers. During the
first quarter of fiscal 2010 we incurred scrap charges of $0.1 million relating to engineering
design changes. We did not incur any similar charges during the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
19
Table of Contents
Operating Costs and Expenses
Three Months Ended April 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
% of | % of | 2010 over 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | Revenue | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general, and
administrative expenses,
excluding corporate overhead |
$ | 404 | 5 | % | $ | 815 | 40 | % | (50 | %) | ||||||||||
Corporate overhead |
1,003 | 13 | % | 871 | 43 | % | 15 | % | ||||||||||||
Engineering and support expenses |
902 | 12 | % | 870 | 43 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||||||
$ | 2,309 | 31 | % | $ | 2,556 | 126 | % | (10 | %) | |||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased by $0.4 million during the first
quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to the same period of the prior year, primarily as a result of a
reduction in legal expense of $0.4 million incurred during the first quarter of the prior year
relating to the certain litigation which was dismissed in May 2009.
Corporate overhead consists of salaries and other personnel-related expenses of our accounting
and finance, human resources and benefits, and other administrative personnel, as well as
professional fees, directors fees, and other costs and expenses attributable to being a public
company. The increase in corporate overhead of $0.1 million during the first quarter of fiscal
2011 compared to the same period of the prior year relates primarily to fiscal 2011 bonus accruals
as well as additional staffing costs in the accounting department.
Engineering and support expenses generally consist of salaries, employer paid benefits, and
other personnel related costs of our engineers and testing personnel, as well as facility and IT
costs, professional and consulting fees, lab costs, material usages, and travel and related costs
incurred in the development and support of our products. The engineering costs remained relatively
constant in the first quarter of the current year compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Other expense, net
Other expense, net, consists primarily of interest income earned on invested cash balances
offset by interest expense related to our credit facility. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011,
we earned $8,000 in interest income but incurred $27,000 in interest expense and amortization of
loan origination fees related to our credit facility. In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we had
incurred $43,000 in loan origination fees but earned $33,000 in interest income.
Income Tax Expense
Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our
deferred tax assets and liabilities, and any required valuation allowance. The Company continues to
have a fully valued deferred tax asset. This valuation allowance was previously established based
on managements overall assessment of risks and uncertainties related to our future ability to
realize, and hence, utilize certain deferred tax assets, primarily consisting of net operating
losses and carry forward temporary differences. Due to the losses incurred during the first quarter
of fiscal 2011, the adjusted net deferred tax assets remain fully reserved as of April 30, 2010.
Discontinued Operations, net of income taxes
Income from Discontinued Operations Call Box
The sale of the Call Box business was completed on July 10, 2008, which resulted in a pre-tax
gain of $490,000 during fiscal 2009. During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company recorded
very minor expenses related to the discontinued operations of the Call Box business and incurred no
similar expenses during the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
20
Table of Contents
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations Wireless Test Solutions
(in thousands except change)
(in thousands except change)
Three Months Ended April 30, | Year over Year | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % Change | ||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | | $ | | | |||||||
Income from discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||
Gain on sale, net of income taxes of $0 |
$ | | $ | 43 | (100 | %) | ||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations, before taxes |
(8 | ) | | | ||||||||
Income tax expense |
| | | |||||||||
Total income (loss) from discontinued operations |
$ | (8 | ) | $ | 43 | (119 | %) | |||||
The sale of the wireless test solutions business was completed on January 6, 2009, which
resulted in a pre-tax gain of $5.9 million recorded in fiscal 2009. The $43,000 recorded during the
first quarter of fiscal 2010 relates primarily to adjustments to the acquired assets and
liabilities assumed by Ascom.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and cash equivalents at April 30, 2010 decreased $1.1 million to $9.0 million as compared
to $10.1 million at January 31, 2010. The following table is a summary of our Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Three Months Ended April 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Cash used in: |
||||||||
Operating activities |
$ | (1,016 | ) | $ | (1,526 | ) | ||
Investing activities |
(71 | ) | (58 | ) | ||||
Financing activities |
(56 | ) | (43 | ) |
Operating Activities
Cash used in operating activities of $1.0 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was
primarily attributable to our net loss from continuing operations of $0.7 million and an increase
in other assets of $0.2 million. Additionally, accrued liabilities decreased $0.7 million and
inventory increased by $0.2 million. These uses of cash are offset by an increase in accounts
payable of $0.5 million and non-cash depreciation of $0.2 million.
Cash used in operating activities of $1.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 was
primarily attributable to our net loss from continuing operations of $2.9 million and a decrease in
accrued liabilities of $1.2 million offset by collection of receivables of $1.9 million and a
decrease in inventory balances of $0.5 million. The decrease in accrued liabilities was primarily
related to payments made to Ascom of $0.9 million which represent Comarco collections of accounts
receivable balances sold to Ascom offset by payments made on behalf of Ascom for trade payables
assumed in conjunction with the sale of WTS.
Investing Activities
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010 we purchased $71,000 and $58,000,
respectively, of property and equipment, primarily tooling and other equipment used by our contract
manufacturers and engineers for the manufacture and design of our ChargeSource® products.
Financing Activities
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010, we paid SVB $56,000 and $43,000,
respectively in conjunction with the Loan and Security Agreement described below.
21
Table of Contents
Our Loan Agreement with SVB was renewed on February 9, 2010 and matures on February 10, 2011, at
which time, any outstanding principal balance is payable in full. Under the Loan Agreement, the
Company may borrow up to (a) the lesser of (i) $10,000,000 or (ii) 80 percent of the Companys
eligible accounts receivable minus (b) the amount of any outstanding principal balance of any
advances made by SVB under the Loan Agreement. As of April 30, 2010, we have borrowed $1,000,000
under this Loan Agreement, and we have one letter of credit outstanding in the amount of $77,000.
Our obligations under the Loan Agreement are secured by a first priority perfected security
interest in our assets, including intellectual property. Amounts borrowed under the Loan Agreement
bear interest at a floating per annum rate equal to 1.5% above SVBs prime rate or, for any period
in which we have failed to maintain a quick ratio of 2.0 to 1.0 and for a period of three months
following the cure thereof, 2.5% above SVBs prime rate; provided that the interest rate in effect
on any day shall not be less than 5.5% per annum. For any period in which we have failed to
maintain the quick ratio threshold, we will be subject to a monthly collateral monitoring fee of
$1,000.
Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, we must maintain a quick ratio of 1.5 to 1.0 as our primary
financial covenant and we must also comply with certain reporting covenants. As of April 30, 2010
our quick ratio was 1.43 to 1.0, which was below the quick ratio of 1.5 to 1.0 required by the Loan
Agreement for the month ended April 30, 2010. As a result, an event of default occurred under the
Loan Agreement and on June 11, 2010, we and SVB entered into the Forbearance. Pursuant to the
Forbearance, SVB agreed that, so long as no event of default under the Loan Agreement exists other
than our violation of the quick ratio covenant for the months of April and May of 2010, SVB shall
not exercise its right against us until after July 15, 2010, the date at which the May 2010 quick
ratio calculation is due to be reported to SVB. Our management is scheduled to meet with
representatives of SVB after the date of this filing and prior to the end of June 2010 to discuss
the possibility of obtaining a waiver with respect to this covenant default and/or the possibility
of amending or otherwise revising the Loan Agreement. While we believe we have a good working
relationship with SVB, there are no assurances that this meeting will result in our obtaining the
requested waiver or other amendment or revision to the Loan Agreement. In addition, there can be no
assurance that the interest rate charged to us under the Loan Agreement will not increase or that
future terms required by SVB will not further limit our operational or financial flexibility. If we
fail to obtain the necessary waiver or to successfully negotiate the required amendment or revision
to the Loan Agreement with respect to the events of default covered by the Forbearance, or if we do
not comply with the terms and covenants in the Loan Agreement in the future and we are unsuccessful
in obtaining the then necessary forbearance, waiver or amendment, we may be prohibited from
borrowing additional amounts under the Loan Agreement and the interest and principal amounts
outstanding under the Loan Agreement may be declared by SVB to be due and immediately payable. In
this event, we may be required to seek alternative debt financing or sell equity securities. If we
incur debt, our operating and financial flexibility may be further limited and, if we sell equity
securities to a third party, the percentage ownership of our existing shareholders will be diluted,
and any new equity securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our
common stock. There can be no assurances that such alternatives will be available to us on
commercially reasonable terms or otherwise.
We are focused on preserving our cash balances by monitoring expenses, identifying cost
savings, and investing only in those development programs and products that we believe will most
likely contribute to our profitability. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalent
balances, as well as our existing credit facility will provide us sufficient funds to satisfy our
cash requirements as our business is currently conducted for at least the next 12 months assuming
we are successful in obtaining the necessary forbearance or amendment to our primary financial
covenant in the Loan Agreement for future periods as discussed above. In addition to our cash and
cash equivalent balances, we expect to derive a portion of our liquidity from our cash flows from
operations. Certain factors and events could negatively affect our cash flows from operations,
including:
| In the event that any of our significant customers cancel a significant amount of orders or are unable to perform due to their inability to take delivery of the ordered products and/or pay for such products in a timely manner, we would be required to establish alternative distribution channels. Such significant change would negatively impact our revenue, operating results, and cash flows. | ||
| Should the actual Recall costs incurred exceed the amounts that have been accrued in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, our operating results and cash flows would be negatively impacted. |
22
Table of Contents
| Should the contract manufacturers of our ChargeSource® products become unable to manufacture our products at the levels currently anticipated, our operating results and cash flows would be negatively impacted. | ||
| The delay in development or release of our ChargeSource® products could negatively impact our revenue, operating results and cash flows. |
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Currency Risk
We are exposed to the risk of changes in currency exchange rates. As of April 30, 2010, we had
no material accounts receivable denominated in foreign currencies. Our standard terms require
customers to pay for our products and services in U.S. dollars. For those orders denominated in
foreign currencies, we may limit our exposure to losses from foreign currency transactions through
forward foreign exchange contracts. To date, sales denominated in foreign currencies have not been
significant and we have not entered into any foreign exchange contracts.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while at the same
time maximizing the income we receive from our investments without significantly increasing risk.
Some of the securities that we have invested in may be subject to market risk. This means that a
change in prevailing interest rates may cause the principal amount of the investment to fluctuate.
For example, if we hold a security that was issued with a fixed interest rate at the
then-prevailing rate and the prevailing interest rate later rises, the principal amount of our
investment will probably decline in value. To minimize this risk, we maintain a significant portion
of our cash balances in money market funds. In general, money market funds are not subject to
interest rate risk because the interest paid on such funds fluctuates with the prevailing interest
rate.
We do not hold any derivative financial instruments.
Our cash and cash equivalents have maturity dates of three months or less and the fair value
approximates the carrying value in our condensed consolidated financial statements. Our cash and
cash equivalents are generally maintained in uninsured accounts, typically Eurodollar deposits with
daily liquidity, which are subject to investment risk including possible loss of principal
invested.
23
Table of Contents
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are the controls and other procedures of an issuer that
are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports filed
or submitted by it under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), is
recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and
forms of the SEC. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and
procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in its
Exchange Act reports is accumulated and communicated to the issuers management, including its
principal executive and financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
Under the direction and participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of April 30, 2010, the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form
10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision
of, the issuers principal executive and financial officers, and effected by the issuers board of
directors, management, and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies
and procedures that:
(1) | pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer; | ||
(2) | provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the issuer are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the issuer; and | ||
(3) | provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the issuers assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter
ended April 30, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
24
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Mark Chapman (Chapman) vs. Comarco Wireless Technologies, Inc., Case No.
73-166-03168-09 02 FEZA-C, American Arbitration Association. On July 15, 2009, a former officer and
employee of the Company filed a demand for arbitration against the Company with the American
Arbitration Association claiming that he is entitled to a payment pursuant to the terms of a
written Severance Compensation Agreement as well as reimbursement for his attorneys fees relating
to this claim. The Severance Compensation Agreement provides that in the event the employee is
terminated by the Company without Cause (as defined in such agreement), or ceases to be employed
by the Company for reasons other than because of death, disability, retirement or Cause, or the
employee terminates his employment with us for Good Reason (as defined in such agreement), in
each case, within 24 months following a Change of Control (as defined in such agreement), the
employee would be entitled to receive a lump sum cash payment equal to the sum of his annual base
salary plus his annual incentive compensation bonus that would be payable assuming 100 percent
satisfaction of all performance goals. The former officer and employee claims that the January
2009 sale of our WTS business to Ascom and/or a change to the composition of the Companys Board of
Directors constituted a Change of Control such that he is entitled to the specified payment because
he ceased to be employed by the Company as a result of such transaction, although his employment
was assumed by Ascom in essentially the same capacity following the consummation of the
transaction. We have denied that a Change of Control occurred and contend that the former employee
is not entitled to any payment pursuant to the Severance Compensation Agreement. Arbitration for
this matter is scheduled for September 28, 2010. The outcome of this matter is neither determinable
nor estimable as of the date of filing this annual report on Form 10-Q.
In addition to the matter described above, we are from time to time involved in various legal
proceedings incidental to the conduct of our business. We believe that the outcome of all such
pending legal proceedings will not in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated results of operations and financial position.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our business, financial condition and operations are subject to a number of factors,
risks and uncertainties, including those previously disclosed under Part I. Item 1A Risk Factors
of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010 as well as any
amendments thereto or additions and changes thereto contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q
and any subsequent filings of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. The disclosures in our annual report
on Form 10-K, this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and our subsequent reports and filings are not
necessarily a definitive list of all factors that may affect our business, financial condition and
future results of operations. There have been no material changes to the risk factors as disclosed
in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010, except as provided in
any amendments thereto and those set forth below.
We do not currently comply with the minimum stockholders equity requirements for continued listing
on the NASDAQ Global Market and there is no assurance that our shares will remain listed on such
market or other active trading market in the future. A delisting of our stock from the NASDAQ
Global Market or any other active trading market could adversely affect the price and liquidity of
our securities in the secondary market.
On May 19, 2010, we received a staff deficiency letter from The Nasdaq Stock Market (NASDAQ)
indicating that we do not comply with the minimum stockholders equity requirement of $10 million
for continued listing on the NASDAQ Global Market. As of April 30, 2010, our stockholders equity
was approximately $8.8 million. NASDAQ has informed us that we have until July 6, 2010 to submit a
plan advising NASDAQ of the action we have- taken, or plan to take, to comply with the listing
requirements of the NASDAQ Global Market. Alternatively, NASDAQ has informed us that we may elect
to apply for a transfer of the listing of our common stock to the NASDAQ Capital Market, which has
less stringent listing standards.
25
Table of Contents
While we currently intend to prepare a plan of compliance to submit to NASDAQ by the required
deadline, there can be no assurance that NASDAQ will accept the compliance plan or that we will be
able to increase our stockholders equity sufficiently to comply with the continued listing
standards of the NASDAQ Global Market. Similarly, if the listing of our shares is transferred to
the NASDAQ Capital Market, there can be no assurances that in the future we will be able to comply
with all of the continued listing requirements of that market. A delisting of our common stock
could adversely affect the market price and market liquidity of our common stock and our ability to
raise capital.
As of April 30, 2010, our quick ratio fell below 1.5 to 1.0, resulting in a breach of the financial
covenants in the Loan Agreement. Our failure to comply with the covenants in the Loan Agreement
could result in a default under this agreement.
As of April 30, 2010, our quick ratio was 1.43 to 1.0 as calculated pursuant to our Loan
Agreement and was below the quick ratio of 1.5 to 1.0 required by the Loan Agreement for the month
ended April 30, 2010. As a result, an event of default has occurred under our Loan Agreement and on
June 11, 2010 we and SVB entered into the Forbearance. Pursuant to the Forbearance, SVB agreed
that, so long as no other event of default under the Loan Agreement exists other than our violation
of the quick ratio covenant for the months of April and May 2010, SVB shall not exercise its rights
against us until July 15, 2010, the date at which the May 2010 quick ratio calculation is due to be
reported to SVB. Our management is scheduled to meet with representatives of SVB after the date of
this filing and prior to the end of June 2010 to discuss the possibility of obtaining a waiver with
respect to this covenant default and/or the possibility of amending or otherwise revising the Loan
Agreement.
There are no assurances that this meeting will result in our obtaining the requested waiver or
other amendment or revision to the Loan Agreement. In addition, there can be no assurance that the
interest rate charged to us under the Loan Agreement will not increase or that future terms
required by the bank will not further limit our operational or financial flexibility. If we fail to
obtain the necessary waiver or to successfully negotiate the required amendment or revision to the
Loan Agreement with respect to the events of default covered by the Forbearance, or if we do not
comply with the terms and covenants in the Loan Agreement in the future and we are unsuccessful in
obtaining the then necessary forbearance, waiver or amendment, we may be prohibited from borrowing
additional amounts under the Loan Agreement and the interest and principal amounts outstanding
under the Loan Agreement may be declared by SVB to be due and immediately payable. In this event,
we may be required to seek alternative debt financing or sell equity securities. If we incur debt,
our operating and financial flexibility may be further limited and, if we sell equity securities to
a third party, the percentage ownership of our existing shareholders will be diluted and any new
equity securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our common shares.
There can be no assurances that such alternatives will be available to us on commercially
reasonable terms or otherwise.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
On June 11, 2010 the Company and SVB entered into the Forbearance. Pursuant to the
Forbearance, SVB agreed that, so long as no event of default under the Loan Agreement exists other
than the Companys violation of
26
Table of Contents
its quick ratio covenant for the months of April and May 2010, SVB
shall not exercise its rights against the Company
until after July 15, 2010, the date at which the May 2010 quick ratio calculation is due to be
reported to SVB. The Forbearance has been filed as Exhibit 10.3 to this Quarterly Report of Form
10-Q and is incorporated herein by reference. This information is provided in this Report in
response to Item 1.01, Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, and Item 9.01, Financial
Statements and Exhibits, of Form 8-K in lieu of filing a Form 8-K.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
3.1
|
Articles of Incorporation of Comarco, Inc., as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on December 15, 2000) | |
3.2
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Comarco, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to our Quartery Report on Form 10-Q, filed on September 14, 2009) | |
3.3
|
Certificate of Determination of Series A Participating Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to our Registration Statement on Form 8-A, filed on February 6, 2003) | |
10.1
|
Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of February 12, 2009, by and among Comarco, Inc., Comarco Wireless Technologies, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 18, 2009) | |
10.2
|
First Amendment to the Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of February 9, 2010, by and among Comarco, Inc., Comarco Wireless Technologies, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 16, 2010) | |
10.3
|
Forbearance to Loan and Security Agreement dated as of June 11, 2010 by and among Comarco, Inc., Comarco Wireless Technologies, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank | |
10.4*
|
Comarco, Inc. Executive Incentive Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 25, 2010) | |
10.5*
|
Executed Employment Agreement dated May 1, 2010 between the Company and Samuel M. Inman, III (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed May 3, 2010) | |
10.6*
|
Executed Employment Agreement dated May 1, 2010 between the Company and Winston E. Hickman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed May 3, 2010) | |
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
* | Management contract or executive compensation plan or arrangement. |
27
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
COMARCO, INC. |
||||
Date: June 14, 2010 | /s/ SAMUEL M. INMAN, III | |||
Samuel M. Inman, III | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), Director |
||||
Date: June 14, 2010 | /s/ WINSTON E. HICKMAN | |||
Winston E. Hickman | ||||
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
28
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | Description | |
3.1
|
Articles of Incorporation of Comarco, Inc., as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on December 15, 2000) | |
3.2
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Comarco, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on September 14, 2009) | |
3.3
|
Certificate of Determination of Series A Participating Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to our Registration Statement on Form 8-A, filed on February 6, 2003) | |
10.1
|
Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of February 12, 2009, by and among Comarco, Inc., Comarco Wireless Technologies, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 18, 2009) | |
10.2
|
First Amendment to the Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of February 9, 2010, by and among Comarco, Inc., Comarco Wireless Technologies, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 16, 2010) | |
10.3
|
Forbearance to Loan and Security Agreement dated as of June 11, 2010 by and among Comarco, Inc., Comarco Wireless Technologies, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank | |
10.4*
|
Comarco, Inc. Executive Incentive Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 25, 2010) | |
10.5*
|
Executed Employment Agreement dated May 1, 2010 between the Company and Samuel M. Inman, III (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed May 3, 2010) | |
10.6*
|
Executed Employment Agreement dated May 1, 2010 between the Company and Winston E. Hickman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed May 3, 2010) | |
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
* | Management contract or executive compensation plan or arrangement. |
29