UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X]  QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010

[   ]  TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission File Number: 001-12974

SANTA FE GOLD CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Small Business Issuer as Specified in its Charter)

1128 Pennsylvania NE, Suite 200, Albuquerque, NM 87110
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Registrant's telephone number including area code: (505) 255-4852

N/A
Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X]   No [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [   ]   No [X]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 92,287,419 shares outstanding as of May 14, 2010.

SANTA FE GOLD CORPORATION
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

2

PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SANTA FE GOLD CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-3

SANTA FE GOLD CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)

F-4

SANTA FE GOLD CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

SANTA FE GOLD CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Continued)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-5

SANTA FE GOLD CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2010
(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

          Santa Fe Gold Corporation (the Company) is a U.S. mining company incorporated in Delaware in August 1991. Its general business strategy is to acquire, explore and develop mineral properties. The Company’s principal assets are the 100% owned Summit silver-gold project in New Mexico, the leased Ortiz gold property in New Mexico, the 100% owned Black Canyon mica project in Arizona, the 100% owned Planet micaceous iron oxide property in Arizona, and formerly the purchase option lease contract on the Pilar gold property in Sonora, Mexico. Based upon the initial results of its sampling program, the Company has decided not to continue any additional work on the Pilar gold property, and in accordance with the provisions of the contract has relinquished its rights in the project.

          The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of the Company included herein have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q under Article 8.03 of Regulation S-X. These statements do not include all of the information and notes to the financial statements required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending June 30, 2010. The unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with Securities and Exchange Commission.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Going Concern

          The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. Should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern, it may be unable to realize the carrying value of its assets and to meet its liabilities as they become due.

          The Company had a net loss of $2,418,382 for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, has a working capital deficit of $6,020,324 which includes a non-cash financial derivative liability of $12,518,832 and has a total accumulated deficit of $56,338,478 at March 31, 2010. In addition, the Company had only nominal revenue generating operations in the nine months ended March 31, 2010. To continue as a going concern, the Company is dependent on continued fund raising for project development and for administrative operating expenses.

          The Company’s consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence.

Principles of Consolidation

          The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Azco Mica, Inc., a Delaware corporation, The Lordsburg Mining Company, a New Mexico corporation, Minera Sandia, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation, and Santa Fe Gold Barbados Corporation, a Barbados corporation. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

6

Estimates

          The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Fair Value Measurements

          U.S. accounting standards require disclosure of a fair-value hierarchy of inputs the Company uses to value an asset or a liability. In September 2006, the FASB issued new accounting guidance, which establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Company previously partially adopted this guidance for all instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. In the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company adopted the remaining provisions of the guidance for all non-financial assets and liabilities that are not re-measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The adoption of these provisions did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

          Fair value standards define fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, the standards establish a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires that the Company maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of the fair-value hierarchy are described as follows:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. For the Company, Level 1 inputs include quoted prices on the Company’s securities that are actively traded.

Level 2: Inputs other than Level 1 that is observable, either directly or indirectly. For the Company, Level 2 inputs include assumptions such as estimated life, risk free rate and volatility estimates used in determining the fair values of the Company’s option and warrant securities issued derivative financial instruments.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little of no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flows methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

          The Company measures financial instruments that it considers to be derivatives at fair value on a recurring basis which consist of certain embedded features contained within its debt instruments and certain warrant contracts. The derivatives are measured on their respective origination dates, at the end of each reporting period and at other points in time when necessary, such as modifications, using Level 3 inputs in accordance with GAAP. The Company does not report any financial assets or liabilities that it measures using Level 1 or Level 2 inputs. The derivatives and their respective derivative values measured using Level 3 inputs as of March 31, 2010 are as follows:

          Idle equipment includes equipment associated with the mica project which the Company ceased operations and are classified as Level 3. The fair value of the idle equipment was determined based upon an independent third party appraisal. The appraised value was established based upon comparable sales of similar assets and certain assumptions regarding market demand for these assets. As this valuation was based upon unobservable inputs, we classified the idle equipment as Level 3. There was no change in the carrying valuation of the idle equipment during the nine-month period ended March 31, 2010 and the reduction of $34,972 during this period resulted from the sale of equipment.

7

Derivative Financial Instruments

          The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks.

          The Company reviews the terms of convertible debt, equity instruments and other financing arrangements to determine whether there are embedded derivative instruments, including embedded conversion options that are required to be bifurcated and accounted for separately as a derivative financial instrument. Also, in connection with the issuance of financing instruments, the Company may issue freestanding options or warrants that may, depending on their terms, be accounted for as derivative instrument liabilities, rather than as equity. The Company may also issue options or warrants to non-employees in connection with consulting or other services.

          Derivative financial instruments are initially measured at their fair value. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instruments are initially recorded at their fair values and are then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair values reported as charges or credits to income. For option-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value the derivative instruments. To the extent that the initial fair values of the freestanding and/or bifurcated derivative instrument liabilities exceed the total proceeds received, an immediate charge to income is recognized, in order to initially record the derivative instrument liabilities at their fair value.

          The discount from the face value of a convertible debt or equity instrument resulting from allocating some or all of the proceeds to the derivative instrument, together with the stated interest on the instrument, is amortized over the life of the instrument through periodic charges to income, usually using the effective interest method.

          The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is reassessed at the end of each reporting period. If reclassification is required, the fair value of the derivative instrument, as of the determination date, is reclassified. Any previous charges or credits to income for changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument are not reversed. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within twelve months of the balance sheet date.

Deferred Revenue

          Deferred revenue represents a cash advance made under a definitive gold sale agreement to sell a portion of the life-of-mine gold production only from our Summit silver-gold mine. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company will receive two upfront cash advances and on going production payments equal to the lesser of $400 per ounce and the prevailing market price, for each ounce of gold delivered pursuant to the agreement. The upfront cash advances will be amortized over the life of the agreement based upon the estimated ounces of gold to be delivered under the life of the agreement. Deferred revenue on the Company’s balance sheet is categorized as current if the Company expects to recognize such revenue within the following twelve months.

Net Earnings (Loss) per Common Share

          The Company calculates net income (loss) per share as required by Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 260-10, Earnings per Share (“ASC 260-10”). Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding. During the periods when they are anti-dilutive, common stock equivalents, if any, are not considered in the computation. Therefore the impact of outstanding stock equivalents has not been included as they would be anti-dilutive.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

          Effective July 1, 2009, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 105-10, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – Overall (“ASC 105-10”). ASC 105-10 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of authority. The Codification superseded all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification is non-authoritative. The FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU’s”). The FASB will not consider ASU’s as authoritative in their own right. ASU’s will serve only to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification. References made to FASB guidance throughout this document have been updated for the Codification.

8

          Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the AICPA, and the SEC did not, or are not believed by management to, have a material impact on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3 – ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING POLICY

          In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue 07-5 (EITF 07-5), “Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock”. EITF 07-5, which is now included in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification at ASC 815-40-15-5, requires entities to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock by assessing the instrument’s contingent exercise provisions and settlement provisions. Instruments not indexed to their own stock fail to meet the scope exception of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, paragraph 11(a), now included in the FASB Codification at ASC 815-10-15-74(a), and should be classified as a liability and marked-to-market. ASC 815-40-15-5 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 (effective as of July 1, 2009 for the Company) and is to be applied to outstanding instruments upon adoption with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recognized as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings or other appropriate components of equity.

          The Company has various warrants outstanding which it has previously accounted for as derivative instrument liabilities and the accounting for those warrants is not changed by the adoption of ASC 815-40-15-5. However, prior to July 1, 2009, the conversion option embedded in the Company’s $13,500,000 7% Senior Secured Convertible Debentures was not separately accounted for as a derivative instrument liability. Effective July 1, 2009, the conversion option met the criteria of a derivative instrument liability because the terms of the Senior Secured Convertible Debentures require that the conversion price be adjusted in certain circumstances that do not meet the “fixed-for-fixed’ criteria in ASC 815-40-15-5. As a result, the Company is now required to separately account for the embedded conversion option as a derivative instrument liability, carried at fair value and marked-to-market each period, with changes in the fair value each period charged or credited to income.

          The cumulative effect of this change in accounting principle of $2,381,894 has been recognized as a reduction of the opening balances of retained earnings and of additional paid-in capital as of July 1, 2009 of $942,636 and $1,439,258, respectively, with corresponding adjustments at July 1, 2009 to decrease the carrying value of the Convertible Debentures by $323,137 and the recognition of a derivative liability of $2,705,031. The cumulative effect adjustment is the difference between the amounts previously recognized in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009 and the amounts that would have been recognized if the conversion option in the Convertible Debentures had been accounted for as a derivative instrument liability from the issuance date.

          For the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recognized a loss for the change in fair value of the embedded conversion derivative liability in the amounts of $379,098 and $-0-, respectively.

          For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, the Company recognized a gain for the change in fair value of the derivative liability in the amount of $671,158. For the nine months ended March 31, 2009, the Company recognized a loss of $3,474,893.

          In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) ASU 2009-05, Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value (“ASU 2009-05”). ASU 2009-05 provides guidance on measuring the fair values of liabilities under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”). ASU 2009-05 describes various valuation methods that can be applied to estimating the fair value of liabilities, requires the use of observable inputs, and minimizes the use of unobservable valuation inputs. ASU 2009-05 was effective for the Company’s interim reporting period beginning October 1, 2009.

9

NOTE 4 - DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENT LIABILITIES

          The fair market value of the derivative instruments liability at March 31, 2010, was determined to be $12,518,830 with the following assumptions: (1) risk free interest rate of 0.68% to 2.43%, (2) remaining contractual life of 1.45 to 4.76 years, (3) expected stock price volatility of 86%, and (4) expected dividend yield of zero. Based upon the change in fair value, the Company has recorded a non-cash gain on derivative instruments for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, of $671,158 and a corresponding decrease in the derivative instruments liability.

The derivative liability is comprised of the following as of:

          The entire amount of derivative instrument liabilities are classified as current due to the fact that settlement of the derivative instruments could be required within twelve months of the balance sheet date.

NOTE 5 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE AND DEBENTURES

Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes

          On October 30, 2007, the Company completed the placement of 10% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes of $450,000. The notes were placed with three accredited investors for $150,000 each. The notes have a term of 60 months, and at such time all remaining principal and interest shall be due. The notes bear interest at 10% per annum. Interest will accrue for 18 months from the date of closing. Interest on the outstanding principal balance will then be payable in quarterly installments commencing on the first day of the 19th month following closing. In connection with the transaction, the Company issued a five year warrant for each $2.50 invested, for a total of 180,000 warrants, each warrant giving the note holder the right to purchase one share of common stock at a price of $1.25 per share. At the option of the holders of the convertible notes, the outstanding principal and interest is convertible at any time into shares of the Company’s common stock at conversion price of $1.25 per share. The notes will be automatically converted into common stock if the weighted average closing sales price of the stock exceeds $2.50 per share for ten consecutive trading days. The shares underlying the notes and warrants will be registered on request of the note holders, provided the weighted average closing price of the stock exceeds $1.50 per share for ten consecutive trading days.

10

Senior Secured Convertible Debenture

          On December 21, 2007, the Company entered into definitive agreements for the placement with a single investor of a 7% Senior Secured Convertible Debenture in the amount of $13,500,000. Proceeds from the debenture were issued in accordance with a pre-determined funding schedule related to the Summit project’s anticipated construction requirements. The term of the debenture is 60 months, at the end of which time all remaining principal and interest shall be due. The debenture bears interest at the rate of 7% per annum. Interest on the outstanding principal balance is payable in quarterly installments, commencing on July 1, 2009. Interest may be paid in cash or stock at the investor’s election. If paid in stock, the number of shares will be calculated using the average of the daily volume weighted average sales prices of the common stock for the twenty (20) trading days immediately preceding the payment date. The entire amount of principal and any unpaid interest will be due December 31, 2012, subject to the investor’s right to require the Company after 36 and 48 months to apply up to 30% of the Summit project’s positive cash flow toward retirement of the debenture. The debenture is secured by a mortgage on the Summit real property and a security interest in Summit personal property. The investor may at any time convert unpaid principal and interest into shares of our common stock at the rate of $1.00 per share. The debenture will be automatically converted into common stock if the weighted average closing sales price of the stock exceeds $2.50 per share for 10 consecutive trading days. Beginning January 1, 2011, the Company may redeem the entire outstanding amount of the debenture, including principal and outstanding interest, subject to the investor’s right to convert the debenture into shares of common stock. In connection with the transaction, for every $2.00 of the original principal amount of the debenture, the investor will receive a warrant to purchase one share of common stock at a price of $1.00. The warrants are exercisable from July 1, 2010 to December 31, 2014. The Company has received the total advances under the agreement of $13,500,000, and the Company has issued an aggregate of 6,750,000 warrants under the debenture advances.

          On June 30, 2009, the Company entered into Amendment 2 on the Senior Secured Convertible Debenture dated December 21, 2007. Pursuant to the amendment, all the accrued interest on the debentures due June 30, 2009, in the collective aggregate amount of $974,360, was automatically converted into 974,360 shares of the Company’s common stock effective as of June 30, 2009. Additionally, the aggregate accrued interest on the outstanding principal amounts of the debentures for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009 were paid in shares of the Company’s common stock, to be valued at $1.00 per share at the time of payment and issuance. The amendment also provides that on March 31, 2010, the note holder shall have the option to make a six-month election, by providing written notice of its election thirty days prior to March 31, 2010, to have the March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010 quarterly interest payments paid in shares of the Company’s common stock. The note holder has chosen not to make the election, and consequently the accrued interest relating to the debentures, totaling $236,250 for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, was paid in cash during April 2010. Commencing September 30, 2010, the note holder shall have the option to make an annual election, by providing 30 days prior written notice of its election, to have the subsequent four quarterly interest payments paid in shares of the Company’s common stock. Valuation of the common stock shall be based upon the Market Price of the stock for the 30 trading days immediately preceding the payment due date.

          The components of the convertible notes payable and debentures are as follows as of:

11

          Aggregate yearly maturities of long term debt based upon payment terms at March 31, 2010, are as follows:

          As of March 31, 2010, accrued interest payable on the convertible notes payable and debentures was $242,633.

NOTE 6 – NOTES PAYABLE

          On June 5, 2008, the Company agreed to exercise the option to purchase the Planet MIO property, consisting of thirty-one patented mining claims totaling 523 acres in La Paz County, Arizona. The Company originally leased the property in 2000 from New Planet Copper Mining Company under the terms of a Lease with Option to Purchase. The Company agreed to exercise the purchase option in connection with settlement of an action the Company commenced in March 2007 seeking to confirm that the lease remained in good standing. The purchase price was $250,000. The Company signed a promissory note for $200,000 with interest payable at 10% per annum from the date of closing of the transaction. The original provisions of the note called for a $50,000 payment at the signing of the note, which occurred in August 2008, and four subsequent principal payments of $50,000 plus interest due each anniversary date of the agreement. In August 2009, the amortization schedule of the note was amended to reflect four equal annual payments of principal and interest of $63,094. The due date for the first annual payment was extended with the interest rate increased to 20% per annum during the extension period. The Company has also agreed to pay an additional $2,000 in legal and miscellaneous fees to document the amendment. All other provisions of the original agreement remain unchanged including the provision for a 5% royalty to be paid on any future production from the property.

          On July 25, 2008, the Company entered into an installment sales contract for $94,613 to purchase certain equipment. The term of the agreement is for 36 months at an interest rate of 6.75%, with the equipment securing the loan.

          On September 30, 2009, the Company entered into an installment sales contract for $16,825 to purchase certain equipment. The term of the agreement is for 36 months at an interest rate of 9.25%, with the equipment securing the loan.

          On October 1, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement to finance insurance premiums in the amount of $72,906 at an interest rate of 6.99% with equal payments due monthly beginning November 1, 2009 and continuing until September 1, 2010.

          On November 1, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement to finance insurance premiums in the amount of $139,856 at an interest rate of 5.99% with equal payments due monthly beginning December 10, 2009 and continuing until October 10, 2010.

          The following summarizes notes payable at March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009:

12

          The aggregate maturities of notes payable as of March 31, 2010, is as follows:

NOTE 7 – CAPITAL LEASES

          The Company utilizes capital leases for the purchase of equipment. Lease terms and interest rates for the equipment are 60 months at 6.25%, 36 months at 5.34%, and 36 months at 5.78% . The assets and liabilities under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the asset. The assets are amortized or depreciated over the lower of their related lease terms or their estimated productive lives.

          Minimum future lease payments under capital leases, as of March 31, 2010, for each of the following years and in aggregate, are as follows:

13

NOTE 8 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Issuances of Common Stock

          On July 17, 2009, a director exercised options to purchase 1,150,000 shares of common stock as follows: 1,000,000 shares at $0.10 per share, 75,000 shares at $0.55 per share, and 75,000 shares at $0.60 per share. The total purchase price for the exercise of the options was $186,250. The director utilized proceeds from the Agreement to Sell Royalty dated May 19, 2009. At that time the director also utilized the remaining $13,750 from the Agreement to Sell Royalty to purchase an additional 12,500 shares at $1.10 per share, the market closing price on July 17, 2009. Under the Agreement to Sell Royalty, the entire $200,000 has been utilized and no further amounts are due to the director under the agreement.

          On July 20, 2009, an individual exercised an option to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock at $0.60 per share on a cashless basis. Under the cashless basis exercise, 8,991 shares were issued.

          On July 27, 2009, the Company issued 94,339 shares of common stock at $1.06 per share in connection with a private placement. As part of the private placement the Company also issued 47,169 warrants with an exercise price of $1.06 per share and an expiration of 5 years. The warrants were valued as a derivative instrument liability and recorded separately at fair value at the time of issuance, reducing the value of the equity recorded by the same amount. The private placement was subject to a sales commission and an additional 9,433 shares of common stock were issued as a commission on the transaction.

          On August 6, 2009, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock at $1.06 per share in connection with a private placement. As part of the private placement the Company also issued 50,000 warrants with an exercise price of $1.06 and an expiration of 5 years. The warrants were valued as a derivative instrument liability and recorded separately at fair value at the time of issuance, reducing the value of the equity recorded by the same amount.

          On August 13, 2009, an individual exercised an option to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock at $0.60 per share on a cashless basis. Under the cashless basis exercise, 8,679 shares were issued.

          On August 17, 2009, the Company issued 18,868 shares of common stock at $1.06 per share in connection with a private placement. As part of the private placement the Company also issued 9,434 warrants with an exercise price of $1.06 per share and an expiration of 5 years. The warrants were valued as a derivative instrument liability and recorded separately at fair value at the time of issuance, reducing the value of the equity recorded by the same amount. The private placement was subject to a sales commission and an additional 1,910 shares of common stock were issued as a commission on the transaction. On August 25, 2009, an individual exercised an option to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock at $0.60 per share on a cashless basis. Under the cashless basis exercise, 4,286 shares were issued.

14

          On September 30, 2009, a convertible debenture holder converted $241,500 of accrued interest into 241,500 shares of the Company’s stock. The aggregate amount of accrued interest converted was recorded as capitalized interest expense during the three months ended September 30, 2009.

          On November 10, 2009, a warrant holder exercised 239,989 warrants with an exercise price of $1.00 per share to purchase shares of the Company’s stock on a cashless basis. Under the cashless basis, 67,335 shares were issued.

          On November 18, 2009, 18,219 shares of common stock were issued to a convertible debenture holder for conversion of $18,219 of note principal at $1.00 per share in accordance with the debenture terms.

          On December 7, 2009, the Company issued 20,000 shares of common stock at a market value of $29,400 for investor relations services. These services will be provided through June 2010.

          On December 11, 2009, a warrant holder exercised 651,945 warrants with an exercise price of $1.00 per share to purchase shares of the Company’s stock on a cashless basis. Under the cashless basis, 207,235 shares were issued.

          On December 29, 2009, an option holder exercised 10,000 options with an exercise price of $0.60 per share to purchase shares of the Company’s stock on a cashless basis. Under the cashless basis, 5,522 shares were issued.

          On December 31, 2009, a convertible debenture holder converted $241,500 of accrued interest into 241,500 shares of the Company’s stock. The aggregate amount of accrued interest converted was recorded as capitalized interest expense during the three months ended December 31, 2009.

          On January 15, 2010, a warrant holder exercised 60,000 warrants with an exercise price of $1.25 per share to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock and the Company received cash proceeds of $75,000.

          On January 20, 2010, the Company closed a registered direct offering with 23 institutional investors and issued 7,692,310 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 3,846,155 shares of common stock. The Company received net proceeds of approximately $9,375,000, after deducting placement agent fees and other offering expenses. The securities were issued pursuant to the Company's effective S-3 Registration Statement under which the securities are registered. The units, including the Shares and Warrants (including the Placement Agent warrants) and shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants were issued pursuant to a prospectus supplement dated as of January 20, 2010, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in connection with a takedown from Santa Fe's shelf registration statement on Form S-3, which became effective on December 29, 2009, and the base prospectus contained in such registration statement. From the date of the transaction, the Company has agreed that it will not issue additional common stock or securities convertible into common stock for a period of 90 days. The Company also agreed that in any subsequent financings completed within six months of the closing, except for an underwritten public offering, that the Purchasers shall have the right to participate up to 25% in the subsequent financings. In any registered public offering, the Purchasers shall have the right to participate, but no Purchaser shall have the right to purchase any particular amount of such underwritten public offering.

          On March 22, 2010, an option holder exercised 20,000 options with an exercise price of $0.60 per share to purchase shares of the Company’s stock on a cashless basis. Under the cashless basis, 8,680 shares were issued.

Issuances of Options

          On July 13, 2009, the Company granted a five (5) year option to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock to an employee under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. The option exercise price is $1.00 per share, the closing price on the date of grant, and the options have a vesting period of six months from the date of grant. The fair market value of the options at the time of issuance was determined to be $103,123 with the following assumptions: (1) risk-free rate of interest of 0.92%, (2) an expected life of 2.75 years, (3) expected stock price volatility of 83.13%, and (4) expected dividend yield of zero. Stock-based compensation expense of $103,123 was recognized during the nine months ended March 31, 2010.

          On January 1, 2010, the Company issued 75,000 five year options with an exercise of $1.38, the market price on the date of the grant, to each of the two outside directors. The options have a vesting period of six months from the date of grant. The fair market value of the options at the time of issuance was determined to be $114,600 with the following assumptions: (1) risk-free rate of interest of 1.70%, (2) an expected life of 3.0 years, (3) expected stock price volatility of 85.14%, and (4) expected dividend yield of zero. Stock-based compensation expense of $57,300 was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2010.

15

Issuances of Warrants

          On July 27, 2009, in connection with a private placement for 94,339 shares of the Company’s common stock, the Company issued 47,169 five year warrants giving the holder the right to purchase common stock at $1.06 per share. The fair market value of the warrants under the placement at the time of issuance was determined to be $35,017 with the following assumptions: (1) risk-free rate of interest of 2.63%, (2) an expected life of 5.0 years, (3) expected stock price volatility of 87.31%, and (4) expected dividend yield of zero. The private placement was subject to a sales commission and an additional 4,716 five year warrants were issued as a commission on the transaction. The fair market value of the commission warrants under the placement at the time of issuance was determined to be $3,501 with the following assumptions: (1) risk-free rate of interest of 2.63%, (2) an expected life of 5.0 years, (3) expected stock price volatility of 87.31%, and (4) expected dividend yield of zero.

          On August 6, 2009, in connection with a private placement for 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, the Company issued 50,000 five year warrants giving the holder the right to purchase common stock at $1.06 per share. The fair market value of the warrants under the placement at the time of issuance was determined to be $35,579 with the following assumptions: (1) risk-free rate of interest of 2.73%, (2) an expected life of 5.0 years, (3) expected stock price volatility of 86.19%, and (4) expected dividend yield of zero.

          On August 17, 2009, in connection with a private placement for 18,868 shares of the Company’s common stock, the Company issued 9,434 five year warrants giving the holder the right to purchase common stock at $1.06 per share. The fair market value of the warrants under the placement at the time of issuance was determined to be $6,769 with the following assumptions: (1) risk-free rate of interest of 2.43%, (2) an expected life of 5.0 years, (3) expected stock price volatility of 86.19%, and (4) expected dividend yield of zero. The private placement was subject to a sales commission and an additional 944 warrants were issued as a commission on the transaction. The fair market value of the commission warrants under the placement at the time of issuance was determined to be $677 with the following assumptions: (1) risk-free rate of interest of 2.43%, (2) an expected life of 5.0 years, (3) expected stock price volatility of 86.19%, and (4) expected dividend yield of zero.

          On January 20, 2010, in connection with the registered direct offering for 7,692,310 shares of the Company’s common stock, the Company issued 3,846,155 five year warrants giving the holder the right to purchase common stock at $1.70 per share. The warrants are exercisable immediately after issuance and will expire five years from the date of issuance. The fair market value of the warrants under the placement at the time of issuance was determined to be $2,921,877 with the following assumptions: (1) risk-free rate of interest of 2.45%, (2) an expected life of 5.0 years, (3) expected stock price volatility of 85.19%, and (4) expected dividend yield of zero. The private placement was subject to the issuance of 461,539 warrants to placement agents, exercisable at $1.625 per share and has an exercise period of approximately 4.9 years. The warrants vest six months from the date of issuance. The fair market value of the placement agent warrants under the placement at the time of issuance was determined to be $353,190 with the following assumptions: (1) risk-free rate of interest of 2.45%, (2) an expected life of 4.94 years, (3) expected stock price volatility of 85.19%, and (4) expected dividend yield of zero.

          In connection with the private placement of the senior secured convertible notes on March 20, 2006, the Company issued warrants for 75,001 shares of common stock as part of the financial advisory fee associated with the transaction. The warrants had an exercise price of $1.58 and an initial term of term of three years. On September 6, 2006, the warrant expiration date was amended to September 6, 2009. The warrants were not exercised and expired on September 6, 2009.

          Stock option and warrant activity, both within the 1989 Stock Option Plan and 2007 Equity Incentive Plan and outside of these plans, for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, are as follows:

16

          Stock options and warrants exercisable at March 31, 2010, are as follows:

          As of March 31, 2010, the aggregate intrinsic value of all stock options and warrants vested and expected to vest was approximately $4,754,410 and the aggregate intrinsic value of currently exercisable stock options and warrants was approximately $4,416,910. The intrinsic value of each option share is the difference between the fair market value of the common stock and the exercise price of such option or warrant share to the extent it is "in-the-money". Aggregate intrinsic value represents the value that would have been received by the holders of in-the-money options had they exercised their options on the last trading day of the quarter and sold the underlying shares at the closing stock price on such day. The intrinsic value calculation is based on the $1.05 closing stock price of the Common Stock on March 31, 2010. The total number of in-the-money options and warrants vested and exercisable as of March 31, 2010, was 8,683,203.

          The total intrinsic value of options and warrants exercised during the period ended March 31, 2010, was approximately $9,200. Intrinsic value of exercised shares is the total value of such shares on the date of exercise less the cash received from the option or warrant holder to exercise the options. The total cash proceeds received from the exercise of stock options and warrants was $75,000.

          The total fair value of options and warrants granted during the period ended March 31, 2010, was approximately $3,389,707. The total grant-date fair value of option shares vested during the period ended March 31, 2010, was approximately $103,123.

17

          As of March 31, 2010, there was approximately $57,320 of total unrecognized stock-based compensation cost, net of expected forfeitures, related to unvested stock options granted. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.25 years.

NOTE 9 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

          The Company has evaluated events and transactions that occurred subsequent to March 31, 2010 for possible disclosure or recognition in the consolidated financial statements. The Company has determined that there were no such events or transactions that warrant disclosure or recognition in the consolidated financial statements except as noted below.

          On April 6, 2010, the Company issued a purchase order for the purchase of a mining truck for the Summit project for an aggregate purchase price of $220,000. The Company has made a down payment on the truck of $53,750 and anticipated delivery should occur in 4-5 months.

          On April 16, 2010, an individual exercised an option to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock at $0.60 per share on a cashless basis. Under the cashless basis exercise, 3,815 shares were issued.

          On May 1, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement for investor relations services. The agreement covers a period of twelve months with monthly payments of $15,000, for a total payment of $180,000, and a monthly payment of 15,000 restricted shares of the Company’s stock, for a total payment of 180,000 shares. Additionally, the Company has issued a three (3) year option to purchase 500,000 shares of the Company’s stock with an exercise price of $1.30 for 250,000 shares, and an exercise price of $1.70 for the remaining 250,000 shares. The options shall vest in 25% increments after periods of three, six, nine, and twelve months. The fair market value of the options at the time of issuance was determined to be $170,418 and will be expensed over the vesting periods with the following assumptions: (1) risk-free rate of interest of 1.56%, (2) an expected life of 3.0 years, (3) expected stock price volatility of 71.55%, and (4) expected dividend yield of zero.

18

ITEM 2 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS AND PLAN OF OPERATION

THIS FORM 10-Q MAY CONTAIN CERTAIN “FORWARD-LOOKING” STATEMENTS AS SUCH TERM IS DEFINED IN THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 AND BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION IN ITS RULES, REGULATIONS AND RELEASES, WHICH REPRESENT THE COMPANY’S EXPECTATIONS OR BELIEFS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, STATEMENTS CONCERNING THE COMPANY’S OPERATIONS, ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE, FINANCIAL CONDITION, GROWTH AND ACQUISITION STRATEGIES, INVESTMENTS, AND FUTURE OPERATIONAL PLANS. FOR THIS PURPOSE, ANY STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN THAT ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF HISTORICAL FACT MAY BE DEEMED TO BE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. WITHOUT LIMITING THE GENERALITY OF THE FOREGOING, WORDS SUCH AS “MAY”, “WILL”, “EXPECT”, “BELIEVE”, “ANTICIPATE”, “INTENT”, “COULD”, “ESTIMATE”, “MIGHT”, “PLAN”, “PREDICT” OR “CONTINUE” OR THE NEGATIVE OR OTHER VARIATIONS THEREOF OR COMPARABLE TERMINOLOGY ARE INTENDED TO IDENTIFY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THESE STATEMENTS BY THEIR NATURE INVOLVE SUBSTANTIAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES, CERTAIN OF WHICH ARE BEYOND THE COMPANY’S CONTROL, AND ACTUAL RESULTS MAY DIFFER MATERIALLY DEPENDING ON A VARIETY OF IMPORTANT FACTORS, INCLUDING UNCERTAINTY RELATED TO ACQUISITIONS, GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION, MANAGING AND MAINTAINING GROWTH, THE OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, VOLATILITY OF STOCK PRICE AND ANY OTHER FACTORS DISCUSSED IN THIS AND OTHER REGISTRANT FILINGS WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. THE COMPANY DOES NOT INTEND TO UNDERTAKE TO UPDATE THE INFORMATION IN THIS FORM 10-Q IF ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT LATER TURNS OUT TO BE INACCURATE. THE FOLLOWING SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THE COMPANY’S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2009.

General

          Santa Fe Gold Corporation (“the Company”, “our” or “we”) is a U.S. mining company, incorporated in August 1991 in the state of Delaware, with a general business strategy to acquire and develop mining properties amenable to low cost production. We currently are focused on: (1) developing our Summit silver-gold property located in New Mexico and placing the property into production, (2) conducting further studies on our Ortiz gold project located in New Mexico, (3) funding the re-opening and enhancement of our Black Canyon mica project located in Arizona or alternatively selling the project, (4) raising working capital for general operating and administrative expenses, and (5) acquiring high quality gold, silver and/or copper properties.

Basis of Presentation and Going Concern

          The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. Should we be unable to continue as a going concern, we may be unable to realize the carrying value of our assets and to meet our liabilities as they become due. We had a net loss of $2,418,382 for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, and have a total accumulated deficit of $56,338,478 at March 31, 2010. To continue as a going concern, we are dependent on continued fund raising for project development, execution of our business strategy and payment of general and administrative operating expenses.

          We will need to continue to raise additional working capital to deploy other segments of our business plan and for corporate general and administrative operating expenses. There is no assurance that such funding will be available when needed, or if available, that its terms will be favorable or acceptable to the Company. As of March 31, 2010, we have cash on hand aggregating $7,544,021. We will be required to raise additional working capital in equity or financing transactions in order to satisfy our expected cash expenditures and continue to deploy our current business strategies.

          On September 11, 2009, we entered into a definitive gold sale agreement to sell a portion of the life-of-mine gold production only from our Summit silver-gold mine. Under the terms of the agreement, we received $4.0 million and on going production payments equal to the lesser of $400 per ounce and the prevailing market, for each ounce of gold delivered pursuant to the agreement. The agreement funded $500,000 in September 2009, and the balance of $3.5 million was received under the terms of the agreement in October 2009 upon satisfaction of the funding conditions of the agreement.

19

          On January 20, 2010, the Company closed a registered direct offering and issued 7,692,310 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 3,846,155 shares of common stock. The Company received net proceeds of approximately $9,375,000, after deducting placement agent fees and other offering expenses. The securities were issued pursuant to the Company's effective S-3 Registration Statement under which the securities are registered. See Liquidity and Capital Resources section below for additional description of the Placement transaction.

          The Company’s consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustment relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue in existence.

Derivative Financial Instruments

          In connection with the issuance of debt or equity instruments, we may issue options or warrants to purchase our common stock. In certain circumstances, these options or warrants may be classified as derivative liabilities, rather than as equity. Additionally, the debt or equity instruments may contain embedded derivative instruments, such as conversion options, which in certain circumstances, may be required to be bifurcated from the associated host instrument and accounted for separately as a derivative instrument liability.

          The identification of, and accounting for, derivative instruments is complex. Our derivative instrument liabilities are revalued at the end of each reporting period, with changes in the fair value of the derivative liability recorded as charges or credits to income, in the period in which the changes occur. For warrants that are accounted for as derivative instrument liability, we determined the fair value of these warrants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. That model requires assumptions related to the remaining term of the instruments and risk-free rates of return, our current common stock price and expected dividend yield, and the expected volatility of our common stock price over the life of the warrants. The identification of, and accounting for, derivative instruments and the assumptions used to value them can significantly affect our consolidated financial statements.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Operating Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009

          Sales

          We had revenues of $261,532 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to $45,049 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The increase of $216,483 is due to revenues of $260,763 from precious metals recovery from our initial trial flux material shipments for smelter feedstock. Walk-in sales for aggregate products decreased to $769 for the current three months ended March 31, 2010, from $45,049 for the comparable period ended March 31, 2009.

          Operating Costs and Expenses

          Costs applicable to sales were incurred aggregating $-0- for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to $11,061 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The decrease of $11,061 is attributable to not incurring any operating costs allocable to the nominal aggregate segment in the current reporting period. Costs attributable to the flux material feedstock was not inventoried as the potential value of precious metals recovery was not determinable and all related costs have been capitalized to the project.

          Exploration and mining costs were $275,425 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to $166,600 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, an increase of $108,825. The increase is mainly attributable to increases in shop supplies of $12,532; repairs and maintenance of $15,923; general operating expenses aggregating $47,971; property and casualty insurance of $9,782, and property taxes of $36,214. These increases were offset mainly by a decrease in fuel expense of $7,551.

          General and administrative expenses increased to $655,407 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, from $464,603 for the comparative three months ended March 31, 2009, an increase of $190,804. The increase is attributable primarily to increased expenses in the following areas: labor burden of $80,728; legal services of $30,897 related to financing activities; auditing and accounting expenses of $42,336; corporate filing fees of $13,608, deferred finance costs of $9,290 and investor relations and consulting fees aggregating $147,536. These increases where offset by a decrease in stock compensation related to options of $92,757 and stock exchange fees of $16,682.

20

          Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $127,641 for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as compared to $85,027 for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, and increase of $42,614. The increase is related to on-going equipment purchases for the Summit Project and additional fixed assets put into service.

          Other Income and Expenses

          Other income and (expenses) for the three months ended March 31, 2010, were $3,356,285 as compared to $(6,901,241) for the comparable three months ended March 31, 2009. The net change of $10,257,526 is primarily attributable to an increase in the gain recognized on derivative instruments liability of $9,894,826 and by decreases in accretion of discounts on notes payable of $347,152 and interest expense of $38,506 and were offset by a decrease in interest income of $21,211.

          Loss on Derivative Financial Instruments

          We recognized a gain on derivative financial instruments of $3,634,854 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to a loss of $6,259,972 for the prior year’s comparable period, resulting in a difference of $9,894,826. The non-cash gain arises from adjustments to record the derivative financial instruments at fair values in accordance with current accounting standards. The derivative financial instruments arose in connection with senior secured convertible notes and the issuance of warrants attached to stock subscriptions and warrants issued under our registered direct offering. Otherwise, we generally do not use derivative financial instruments for other purposes, such as hedging cash flow or fair-value risks. The increase in the derivative income in the three months ended March 31, 2010, is attributable mainly to adjustments to record the embedded conversion feature of derivative financial instruments at fair value in accordance with current accounting standards, warrants issued under our registered direct offering, and changes in the market price of our common stock, which is a component of the calculation model and offset by the issuance of additional warrants resulting in derivative treatment.. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of this derivative. Because Black-Scholes uses our stock price, changes in the stock price will result in volatility in the earnings in future periods as we continue to reflect the derivative financial instruments at fair values.

Operating Results for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009

          Sales

          We had revenues of $274,978 for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to $68,192 for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. The increase of $206,786 is due to revenues of $260,763 from precious metals recovery from our initial trial flux material shipments for smelter feedstock. Walk-in sales for aggregate products and miscellaneous decreased to $14,215 for the current nine months ended March 31, 2010, from $68,192 for the comparable period ended March 31, 2009, a decrease of $53,977. The Company does not actively market the aggregate products.

          Operating Costs and Expenses

          Costs applicable to sales were incurred aggregating $264 for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to $34,667 for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. The decrease of $34,403 is attributable to not incurring any operating costs allocable to the nominal aggregate segment in the current reporting period. Costs attributable to the flux material feedstock was not inventoried as the potential value of precious metals recovery was not determinable and all related costs have been capitalized to the project.

          Exploration and mining costs were $449,259 for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to $407,415 for the nine months ended March 31, 2009, an increase of $41,844. The change is mainly attributable to increased costs incurred on a foreign subsidiary aggregating $34,424; repairs and maintenance of $20,934; general operating costs of $38,856; property and casualty liability insurance of $38,069, land lease payments of $7,312, and property taxes of $33,645. These increases were offset by decreases in equipment leases aggregating $43,819; shop supplies of $11,915; fuel costs of $8,031, and relocation costs attributable to the mica division of $78,160.

21

          General and administrative expenses increased to $1,726,510 for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, from $1,615,251 for the comparative nine months ended March 31, 2009, an increase of $111,259. The change is attributable primarily to the following increases: legal services of $119,447 relating to financing activities; auditing and accounting expenses of $63,125; general and administrative expenses related to the recent establishment of two foreign subsidiaries of $28,634; consulting and investor relations costs of $324,441; corporate filing fees of $20,483; commissions and finance fees of $30,678 and labor burden of $102,434. These increases were offset by decreases in the following: stock compensation of $448,000; stock compensation attributable to stock options of $127,231 and stock exchange fees of $16,682.

          Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $342,121 for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to $148,765 for the comparable period ended March 31, 2009, and increase of $193,356. The increase is related to on-going equipment purchases for the Summit Project and additional fixed assets put into service.

          Other Income and Expenses

          Other income and (expenses) for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, were $(175,206) as compared to $(4,596,335) for the comparable nine months ended March 31, 2009. The decrease of $4,424,129 is primarily attributable to decreases of the following: the loss recognized on derivative instruments liability of $4,146,051; accretion of discounts on notes payable of $359,015 and interest expense of $107,886. These expense decreases were offset by income decreases of: interest income of $71,307; miscellaneous income of $56,984 and relief of debt of $48,872.

          Loss on Derivative Financial Instruments

          We recognized a gain on derivative financial instruments of $671,158 for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to a loss of $3,474,893 for the prior year comparable period, resulting in a difference of $4,146,051. The non-cash gain arises from adjustments to record the derivative financial instruments at fair values in accordance with current accounting standards. The derivative financial instruments arose in connection with senior secured convertible notes and the issuance of warrants attached to stock subscriptions and warrants issued under our registered direct offering. Otherwise, we generally do not use derivative financial instruments for other purposes, such as hedging cash flow or fair-value risks. The increase in the derivative gain in the nine months ended March 31, 2010, is attributable mainly to adjustments to record the embedded conversion feature of derivative financial instruments at fair value in accordance with current accounting standards, warrants issued under our registered direct offering, and changes in the market price of our common stock, which is a component of the calculation model and offset by the issuance of additional warrants resulting in derivative treatment. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of this derivative. Because Black-Scholes uses our stock price, changes in the stock price will result in volatility in the earnings in future periods as we continue to reflect the derivative financial instruments at fair values.

PLAN OF OPERATIONS

Liquidity and Capital Resources

          To continue with the deployment of our business strategies, we will require significant additional working capital. We also will require additional working capital for employment of necessary corporate personnel, and related general and administrative expenses.

          As of March 31, 2010, we had cash on hand of $7,544,021, a working capital deficit of $6,020,324, which included a non-cash financial derivative liability of $12,518,832 in this amount, and an accumulated deficit of $56,338,478.

          We are continuing to pursue a joint venture or sale of the Black Canyon mica project. Management has determined to deploy its resources in the area of precious metals based upon the current and projected market trends in this area.

          We continue to seek funding to advance our business plan and strategies. We will require additional funding to meet our corporate general and administrative commitments, to continue feasibility studies on our mineral properties and to initiate exploration programs. We anticipate going into production in the second calendar quarter of 2010 and that our operations for the remaining fiscal year 2010 will be funded mainly from anticipated sales of precious metals, the sale of our securities and possibly through the exercise of certain options and warrants. We believe we will be able to finance our continuing future activities, although there are no assurances of success in this regard or in our ability to obtain continued financing through capital markets, joint ventures, or other acceptable arrangements. If our plans are not successful, future operations and liquidity may be adversely impacted. In the event that we are unable to obtain required capital, we may be forced to reduce our exploration and operating expenditures or to cease development operations altogether.

22

          On September 11, 2009, we entered into a definitive gold sale agreement to sell a portion of the life-of-mine gold production only from our Summit silver-gold mine. Under the terms of the agreement, we received $4.0 million and on going production payments equal to the lesser of $400 per ounce and the prevailing market, for each ounce of gold delivered pursuant to the agreement. The agreement funded $500,000 in September 2009, and the balance of $3.5 million was received under the terms of the agreement in October 2009 upon satisfaction of the funding conditions of the agreement.

          On January 14, 2010, the Company entered into definitive security purchase agreements with 23 institutional investors (collectively, 'Purchasers") to sell an aggregate of $10.0 million of units, each unit consisting of one Share and one-half of a Warrant to purchase a Share by way of the Placement. Pursuant to the transaction, we agreed to sell to the Purchasers an aggregate of 7,692,310 Shares and Warrants to purchase up to 3,846,155 additional Shares. The Warrants are exercisable at an exercise price of $1.70 per share beginning immediately after issuance and will expire 5 years from the date they are first exercisable. The private placement was subject to the issuance of 461,539 warrants to Placement Agents, exercisable at $1.625 per share and have an exercise period of approximately 4.9 years. These warrants vest six months from the date of issuance.

          On January 20, 2010, we closed the registered direct offering and issued 7,692,310 shares of common stock, warrants to purchase an additional 3,846,155 shares of common stock and 461,539 warrants to the Placement Agents. We received net proceeds from the offering of approximately $9,375,000, after deducting placement agent fees and other offering expenses.

          The securities were issued pursuant to the Company's effective S-3 Registration Statement under which the securities are registered. The units, including the Shares and Warrants (including the Placement Agent warrants) and shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants were issued pursuant to a prospectus supplement dated as of January 20, 2010, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in connection with a takedown from Santa Fe's shelf registration statement on Form S-3, which became effective on December 29, 2009, and the base prospectus contained in such registration statement. From the date of the transaction, the Company has agreed that it will not issue additional common stock or securities convertible into common stock for a period of 90 days. The Company also agreed that in any subsequent financings completed within six months of the closing, except for an underwritten public offering, that the Purchasers shall have the right to participate up to 25% in the subsequent financings. In any registered public offering, the Purchasers shall have the right to participate, but no Purchaser shall have the right to purchase any particular amount of such underwritten public offering.

          We are utilizing the net proceeds for general corporate purposes, including but not limited to, working capital for the Summit silver-gold project; acquisition of additional feed sources for expansion of the Lordsburg mill; advancement of the Ortiz gold project; and pursuit of acquisition opportunities.

Factors Affecting Future Operating Results

          We continue to deploy our plan to place the Company on an improved financial footing. In addition to the significant capital raisings already achieved and the securities placement in January 2010, important elements of the plan include remaining current in the filing of our annual and quarterly financial reports and continuing to raise funding as may be required to provide for operations on our various property sites. If we continue to secure required financing on acceptable terms, we believe we will be in a position to execute our business plan on our property sites.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

          During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we did not engage in any off-balance sheet arrangements defined in Item 303(a) (4) of the SEC’s Regulation S-K.

23

ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

          We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Under the supervision of, and the participation of, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2009. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

          During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, there were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II
OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

          None

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

          Not Applicable

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALE OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

          On January 15, 2010, a warrant holder exercised 60,000 warrants with an exercise price of $1.25 per share to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock and the Company received cash proceeds of $75,000.

          On January 20, 2010, the Company closed a registered direct offering and issued 7,692,310 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 3,846,155 shares of common stock. The Company received net proceeds of approximately $9,375,000, after deducting placement agent fees and other offering expenses. The securities were issued pursuant to the Company's effective S-3 Registration Statement under which the securities are registered. The units, including the Shares and Warrants (including the Placement Agent warrants) and shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants were issued pursuant to a prospectus supplement dated as of January 20, 2010, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in connection with a takedown from Santa Fe's shelf registration statement on Form S-3, which became effective on December 29, 2009, and the base prospectus contained in such registration statement. From the date of the transaction, the Company has agreed that it will not issue additional common stock or securities convertible into common stock for a period of 90 days. The Company also agreed that in any subsequent financings completed within six months of the closing, except for an underwritten public offering, that the Purchasers shall have the right to participate up to 25% in the subsequent financings. In any registered public offering, the Purchasers shall have the right to participate, but no Purchaser shall have the right to purchase any particular amount of such underwritten public offering.

          On March 22, 2010, an option holder exercised 20,000 options with an exercise price of $0.60 per share to purchase shares of the Company’s stock on a cashless basis. Under the cashless basis, 8,680 shares were issued.

24

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

          None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

          None

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

          None

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

          (a) The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:

SIGNATURES:

          In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

25