Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-10.21 - EX-10.21 - Symetra Financial CORP | v55851exv10w21.htm |
EX-10.14 - EX-10.14 - Symetra Financial CORP | v55851exv10w14.htm |
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - Symetra Financial CORP | v55851exv32w1.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - Symetra Financial CORP | v55851exv31w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - Symetra Financial CORP | v55851exv31w2.htm |
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - Symetra Financial CORP | v55851exv32w2.htm |
EX-10.23 - EX-10.23 - Symetra Financial CORP | v55851exv10w23.htm |
EX-99.01 - EX-99.01 - Symetra Financial CORP | v55851exv99w01.htm |
EX-10.22 - EX-10.22 - Symetra Financial CORP | v55851exv10w22.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number: 001-33808
SYMETRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 20-0978027 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
777 108th Avenue NE, Suite 1200
Bellevue, Washington 98004
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
Bellevue, Washington 98004
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(425) 256-8000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of May 12, 2010, the Registrant had 118,086,019 common voting shares outstanding, with a par
value of $0.01 per share.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
Table of Contents
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains statements, which constitute
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements, other than statements of
current or historical facts included or referenced in this report that address activities, events
or developments that we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future, are forward-looking
statements. The words will, believe, intend, plan, expect, anticipate, project,
estimate, predict and similar expressions also are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements include, among others, statements with respect to
Symetra Financial Corporations:
| estimates or projections of revenues, net income, net income per share, adjusted operating income, adjusted operating income per share, market share or other financial forecasts; | ||
| trends in operations, financial performance and financial condition; | ||
| financial and operating targets or plans; and | ||
| business and growth strategy. |
These statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by Symetra in light of its
experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future
developments, as well as other factors believed to be appropriate under the circumstances. Whether
actual results and developments will conform to Symetras expectations and predictions is subject
to a number of risks, uncertainties and contingencies that could cause actual results to differ
materially from expectations, including, among others:
| general economic, market or business conditions, including further economic downturns or other adverse conditions in the global and domestic capital and credit markets; | ||
| the availability of capital and financing; | ||
| potential investment losses; | ||
| the effects of fluctuations in interest rates; | ||
| recorded reserves for future policy benefits and claims subsequently proving to be inadequate or inaccurate; | ||
| deviations from assumptions used in setting prices for insurance and annuity products; | ||
| market pricing and competitive trends related to insurance products and services; | ||
| changes in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs; | ||
| financial strength or credit ratings downgrades; | ||
| the continued availability and cost of reinsurance coverage; | ||
| changes in laws or regulations, or their interpretation, including those that could increase Symetras business costs and required capital levels; | ||
| the ability of subsidiaries to pay dividends to Symetra; | ||
| the effects of implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; and | ||
| the risks that are described in Item 1ARisk Factors in this report and Symetras 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in this report are qualified by these
cautionary statements, and there can be no assurance that the actual results or developments
anticipated by Symetra will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the
expected consequences to, or effects on, Symetra or its business or operations. Symetra assumes no
obligation to update publicly any such forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
2
Table of Contents
PART I Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of | As of | |||||||
March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
(In millions, except share and per share data) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Investments: |
||||||||
Available-for-sale securities: |
||||||||
Fixed maturities, at fair value (cost: $18,978.4 and $18,553.7, respectively) |
$ | 19,390.6 | $ | 18,594.3 | ||||
Marketable equity securities, at fair value (cost: $52.6 and $52.6, respectively) |
37.6 | 36.7 | ||||||
Trading securities: |
||||||||
Marketable equity securities, at fair value (cost: $158.3 and $165.9, respectively) |
151.0 | 154.1 | ||||||
Mortgage loans, net |
1,228.0 | 1,201.7 | ||||||
Policy loans |
73.4 | 73.9 | ||||||
Short-term investments |
54.0 | 2.1 | ||||||
Investments in limited partnerships (includes $25.2 and $24.7 measured at fair value,
respectively) |
130.6 | 110.2 | ||||||
Other invested assets |
9.1 | 10.1 | ||||||
Total investments |
21,074.3 | 20,183.1 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
389.3 | 257.8 | ||||||
Accrued investment income |
247.5 | 237.2 | ||||||
Accounts receivable and other receivables |
97.1 | 70.1 | ||||||
Reinsurance recoverables |
277.9 | 276.6 | ||||||
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
227.5 | 250.4 | ||||||
Goodwill |
26.8 | 26.3 | ||||||
Current income taxes recoverable |
19.6 | 20.2 | ||||||
Deferred income tax assets, net |
69.1 | 191.2 | ||||||
Other assets |
80.5 | 84.5 | ||||||
Separate account assets |
854.1 | 840.1 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 23,363.7 | $ | 22,437.5 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Funds held under deposit contracts |
$ | 19,222.9 | $ | 18,816.7 | ||||
Future policy benefits |
395.8 | 394.9 | ||||||
Policy and contract claims |
120.6 | 125.6 | ||||||
Unearned premiums |
14.5 | 12.1 | ||||||
Other policyholders funds |
108.6 | 113.8 | ||||||
Notes payable |
448.9 | 448.9 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
226.6 | 252.1 | ||||||
Separate account liabilities |
854.1 | 840.1 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
21,392.0 | 21,004.2 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 750,000,000 shares authorized; 118,086,019 and
92,729,455 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively |
1.2 | 0.9 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
1,448.3 | 1,165.7 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
362.7 | 316.4 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes |
159.5 | (49.7 | ) | |||||
Total stockholders equity |
1,971.7 | 1,433.3 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 23,363.7 | $ | 22,437.5 | ||||
See accompanying notes.
3
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In millions, except per share data) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||
Premiums |
$ | 119.0 | $ | 119.5 | ||||
Net investment income |
286.9 | 262.7 | ||||||
Policy fees, contract charges, and other |
40.5 | 39.6 | ||||||
Net realized investment gains (losses): |
||||||||
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities |
(17.9 | ) | (51.6 | ) | ||||
Less: portion of losses recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) |
8.2 | 23.8 | ||||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
(9.7 | ) | (27.8 | ) | ||||
Other net realized investment gains (losses) |
16.5 | (15.2 | ) | |||||
Total net realized investment gains (losses) |
6.8 | (43.0 | ) | |||||
Total revenues |
453.2 | 378.8 | ||||||
Benefits and expenses: |
||||||||
Policyholder benefits and claims |
86.2 | 94.4 | ||||||
Interest credited |
218.5 | 195.6 | ||||||
Other underwriting and operating expenses |
59.6 | 63.0 | ||||||
Interest expense |
8.0 | 7.9 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
15.4 | 10.7 | ||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
387.7 | 371.6 | ||||||
Income from operations before income taxes |
65.5 | 7.2 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes: |
||||||||
Current |
9.9 | 1.9 | ||||||
Deferred |
9.3 | 0.2 | ||||||
Total provision for income taxes |
19.2 | 2.1 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 46.3 | $ | 5.1 | ||||
Net income per common share: |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.05 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.05 | ||||
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
131.018 | 111.622 | ||||||
Diluted |
131.038 | 111.622 |
See accompanying notes.
4
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Common | Paid-in | Retained | Comprehensive | Stockholders | ||||||||||||||||
Stock | Capital | Earnings | Income (Loss) | Equity | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balances as of January 1, 2009 |
$ | 0.9 | $ | 1,165.5 | $ | 172.4 | $ | (1,052.6 | ) | $ | 286.2 | |||||||||
Cumulative effect adjustment new accounting
guidance (net of taxes: $(8.4)) |
| | 15.7 | (15.7 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss, net of taxes: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | 5.1 | | 5.1 | |||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss (net of taxes: $(49.9)) |
| | | (92.8 | ) | (92.8 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss, net of taxes |
(87.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Balances as of March 31, 2009 |
$ | 0.9 | $ | 1,165.5 | $ | 193.2 | $ | (1,161.1 | ) | $ | 198.5 | |||||||||
Balances as of January 1, 2010 |
$ | 0.9 | $ | 1,165.7 | $ | 316.4 | $ | (49.7 | ) | $ | 1,433.3 | |||||||||
Common stock issued (net of issuance costs: $20.4) |
0.3 | 282.4 | | | 282.7 | |||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income, net of taxes: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | 46.3 | | 46.3 | |||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (net of taxes: $112.7) |
| | | 209.2 | 209.2 | |||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income, net of taxes |
255.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| 0.2 | | | 0.2 | |||||||||||||||
Balances as of March 31, 2010 |
$ | 1.2 | $ | 1,448.3 | $ | 362.7 | $ | 159.5 | $ | 1,971.7 | ||||||||||
See accompanying notes.
5
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 46.3 | $ | 5.1 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Net realized investment (gains) and losses |
(6.8 | ) | 43.0 | |||||
Accretion and amortization of invested assets, net |
8.8 | 5.4 | ||||||
Accrued interest on bonds |
(11.5 | ) | (8.2 | ) | ||||
Amortization and depreciation |
4.2 | 3.3 | ||||||
Deferred income tax provision |
9.3 | 0.2 | ||||||
Interest credited on deposit contracts |
218.5 | 195.6 | ||||||
Mortality and expense charges and administrative fees |
(25.4 | ) | (25.1 | ) | ||||
Changes in: |
||||||||
Accrued investment income |
(10.3 | ) | (17.7 | ) | ||||
Deferred policy acquisition costs, net |
(14.1 | ) | (48.1 | ) | ||||
Other receivables |
0.2 | 2.0 | ||||||
Future policy benefits |
0.9 | (0.1 | ) | |||||
Policy and contract claims |
(5.0 | ) | (8.6 | ) | ||||
Current income taxes recoverable |
0.6 | 2.2 | ||||||
Other assets and liabilities |
(6.3 | ) | 19.4 | |||||
Other, net |
0.2 | (0.2 | ) | |||||
Total adjustments |
163.3 | 163.1 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
209.6 | 168.2 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||
Purchases of: |
||||||||
Fixed maturities and marketable equity securities |
(1,024.8 | ) | (1,305.3 | ) | ||||
Other invested assets and investments in limited partnerships |
(8.9 | ) | (2.4 | ) | ||||
Issuances of mortgage loans |
(45.8 | ) | (39.0 | ) | ||||
Issuances of policy loans |
(4.7 | ) | (5.2 | ) | ||||
Maturities, calls, paydowns, and other |
387.5 | 308.6 | ||||||
Securities lending collateral returned, net |
| 10.4 | ||||||
Sales of: |
||||||||
Fixed maturities and marketable equity securities |
176.4 | 29.7 | ||||||
Other invested assets and investments in limited partnerships |
4.9 | 0.5 | ||||||
Repayments of mortgage loans |
18.8 | 17.2 | ||||||
Repayments of policy loans |
4.8 | 5.3 | ||||||
Net (increase) decrease in short-term investments |
(51.9 | ) | 2.8 | |||||
Purchases of property, equipment, and leasehold improvements |
(0.4 | ) | (0.3 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(544.1 | ) | (977.7 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||
Policyholder account balances: |
||||||||
Deposits |
$ | 495.3 | $ | 1,016.9 | ||||
Withdrawals |
(295.2 | ) | (301.8 | ) | ||||
Securities lending collateral paid, net |
| (10.4 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
282.7 | | ||||||
Other, net |
(16.8 | ) | (42.6 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
466.0 | 662.1 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
131.5 | (147.4 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
257.8 | 468.0 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 389.3 | $ | 320.6 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information |
||||||||
Non-cash transactions during the period: |
||||||||
Investments in limited partnerships and capital obligations incurred |
18.6 | 1.0 | ||||||
Bond exchanges |
6.0 | 21.7 |
See accompanying notes.
6
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
1. Description of Business
Symetra Financial Corporation is a Delaware corporation that, through its subsidiaries, offers
group and individual insurance products and retirement products, including annuities marketed
through benefits consultants, financial institutions and independent agents and advisors in all
states and the District of Columbia. The Companys principal products include medical stop-loss
insurance, fixed and variable deferred annuities, single premium immediate annuities and individual
life insurance. The accompanying interim financial statements include, on a consolidated basis, the
accounts of Symetra Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries, which are collectively referred to
as Symetra Financial or the Company.
On January 27, 2010, the Company completed an initial public offering (IPO) of its common
stock at an offering price of $12.00 per share. The IPO included 25.260 newly issued shares of
common stock sold by the Company, and 9.700 existing shares of common stock sold by selling
stockholders. The Company received net proceeds from the offering of $282.5. The Company did not
receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates
The interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), including the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), for interim reporting. The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that may
affect the amounts reported in the interim consolidated financial statements and accompanying
notes. These interim consolidated financial statements are unaudited but in managements opinion
include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals, necessary for a
fair presentation.
The interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Symetra Financial
Corporation and its subsidiaries that are wholly owned, directly or indirectly. All significant
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Certain reclassifications have been
made to prior year financial information to conform to the current period presentation. For the
three months ended March 31, 2009, this included a $26.0 reclassification of cost of insurance
charges on universal life-type contracts from premium revenues to policy fees, contract charges and
other revenues on the consolidated statements of income. This reclassification did not change total
revenues or amounts previously reported as other revenues that are now included in policy fees,
contract charges and other.
The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 was derived from audited consolidated
financial statements as of that date but certain information and footnotes required by GAAP for
complete financial statements have been excluded. These interim consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying
notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009,
filed with the SEC. Operating results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the twelve months ended December 31,
2010.
During the first quarter of 2010, the Company revised its estimate for bonus interest reserves
on one of its universal life products. This bonus interest is not earned by the contractholder if
the policys credited rate is equal to the guaranteed minimum. Due to the negative impact the low
interest rate environment has had on investment yields, the credited interest rate is being
adjusted downward to the guaranteed minimum rate over the next year. As a result, for the three
months ended March 31, 2010, income from operations before income taxes increased $7.4. The impact
on net income for the period was $4.8, or $0.03 per share of common stock.
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements
ASC 810-10 (formerly SFAS No. 167), Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167 (ASC 810-10), Amendments to FASB Interpretation No.
46(R), which provides guidance for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity
(VIE); assessing which enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a VIE; and
providing additional disclosures about involvement in such entities. This guidance changed the
basis for determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE from a quantitative analysis to a primarily
qualitative analysis and requires
7
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
reassessment of this determination at each reporting period. The
Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2010, and adoption of
this guidance did not change the Companys previous conclusions regarding its VIEs, which
consist of its investments in limited partnerships.
Based on the analysis of its investments in VIEs, the Company does not meet the definition of
primary beneficiary of any of these VIEs as it lacks the power to direct the activities of its
VIEs, and therefore has not consolidated these entities. The maximum exposure to loss as a result
of the Companys involvement in its VIEs, which includes unfunded commitments, was $170.3 and
$147.3 as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
ASU 2010-6, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurement
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic
820) Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurement. The guidance in this ASU requires
additional disclosures about an entitys fair value measurements, including information about
inputs to Level 2 measurements, gross transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2, and information
about activity for Level 3 measurements on a gross basis. It also clarifies the level of
disaggregation required for existing fair value disclosures. The Company adopted this guidance on
January 1, 2010, except for the provisions regarding activity for Level 3 measurements presented on
a gross basis, which will be adopted on January 1, 2011, as provided for in the guidance. See Note
5 for the Companys disclosures related to fair value measurements.
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
ASU 2010-15, How Investments Held through Separate Accounts Affect an Insurers Consolidation
Analysis of Those Investments
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-15, How Investments Held through Separate Accounts
Affect an Insurers Consolidation Analysis of Those Investments. The guidance in this ASU clarifies
that an insurer should only consider its ownership interests held within its general account when
determining if an entity holds a controlling interest, and thus, excluding interests held in a
separate account. It does not change the guidance for consolidating investments when the general
account holds a controlling interest. The Company will adopt this guidance on January 1, 2011,
which will not change the Companys current practice of excluding ownership interests held in its
separate account from its consolidation analysis.
3. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share represents the amount of earnings for the period available to each
share of common stock outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted earnings per share
represents the amount of earnings for the period available to each share of common stock
outstanding during the reporting period, adjusted for the potential issuance of common stock, if
dilutive.
The outstanding warrants, exercisable for 18.976 common shares, are considered participating
securities or potential common stock securities that are included in weighted-average common shares
outstanding for purposes of computing basic earnings per share using the two-class method. The
warrants are considered participating securities or potential common stock securities because the
terms of the agreements entitle the holders to receive any dividends declared on the common stock
concurrently with the holders of outstanding shares of common stock, on a one-to-one basis.
The Company has issued restricted stock to certain employees, which are subject to service
vesting conditions. These shares are included in the computation of earnings per share, weighted
for the portion of the period the shares were outstanding. Certain of the restricted shares are
considered participating securities because the terms of the agreements entitle the holders to
receive any dividends declared on the common stock concurrently with the holders of outstanding
shares of common stock, on a one-to-one basis. Participating restricted stock is included in basic
and diluted earnings per share based on the application of the two-class method. Non-participating
restricted stock is included in diluted earnings per share based on application of the treasury
stock method.
8
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
The following table presents information relating to the Companys calculations of basic and
diluted earnings per share:
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||
Net income, as reported |
$ | 46.3 | $ | 5.1 | ||||
Denominator: |
||||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding basic |
131.018 | 111.622 | ||||||
Add: Dilutive effect of restricted stock |
0.020 | | ||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding diluted |
131.038 | 111.622 | ||||||
Net income per common share: |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.05 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.05 |
4. Investments
The following tables summarize the Companys available-for-sale fixed maturities and
marketable equity securities. The other-than-temporary impairments (OTTI) in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) represent the amount of cumulative non-credit OTTI losses
transferred to, or recorded in, AOCI for securities that also had a credit-related impairment.
Cost or | Gross | Gross | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | OTTI in | ||||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | AOCI | ||||||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agencies |
$ | 41.6 | $ | 2.5 | $ | | $ | 44.1 | $ | (0.1 | ) | |||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
516.5 | 3.5 | (30.1 | ) | 489.9 | (0.6 | ) | |||||||||||||
Corporate securities |
12,863.4 | 597.8 | (262.4 | ) | 13,198.8 | (26.3 | ) | |||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
3,607.8 | 120.4 | (78.9 | ) | 3,649.3 | (44.5 | ) | |||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
1,711.9 | 79.0 | (16.1 | ) | 1,774.8 | (3.9 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other debt obligations(1) |
237.2 | 13.3 | (16.8 | ) | 233.7 | (3.8 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total fixed maturities |
18,978.4 | 816.5 | (404.3 | ) | 19,390.6 | (79.2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
52.6 | 0.1 | (15.1 | ) | 37.6 | | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 19,031.0 | $ | 816.6 | $ | (419.4 | ) | $ | 19,428.2 | $ | (79.2 | ) | ||||||||
Cost or | Gross | Gross | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | OTTI in | ||||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | AOCI | ||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agencies |
$ | 41.6 | $ | 2.4 | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | 43.9 | $ | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
518.4 | 1.9 | (37.3 | ) | 483.0 | (1.3 | ) | |||||||||||||
Corporate securities |
12,454.8 | 487.5 | (393.7 | ) | 12,548.6 | (32.8 | ) | |||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
3,532.1 | 105.3 | (101.0 | ) | 3,536.4 | (39.9 | ) | |||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
1,805.6 | 44.5 | (60.7 | ) | 1,789.4 | (4.0 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other debt obligations(1) |
201.2 | 9.4 | (17.6 | ) | 193.0 | (3.8 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total fixed maturities |
18,553.7 | 651.0 | (610.4 | ) | 18,594.3 | (81.9 | ) | |||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
52.6 | 0.1 | (16.0 | ) | 36.7 | | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 18,606.3 | $ | 651.1 | $ | (626.4 | ) | $ | 18,631.0 | $ | (81.9 | ) | ||||||||
(1) | As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, this includes foreign government securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, collateralized debt obligations and other asset-backed securities. |
9
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
The following tables summarize gross unrealized losses and fair values of the Companys
available-for-sale investments. For fixed maturities, gross unrealized losses include the portion
of OTTI recorded in AOCI. The tables are aggregated by investment category and present separately
those securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve
months and for twelve months or more.
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | # of | Fair | Unrealized | # of | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Losses | Securities | Value | Losses | Securities | |||||||||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
$ | 38.3 | $ | (0.9 | ) | 10 | $ | 307.0 | $ | (29.2 | ) | 50 | ||||||||||||
Corporate securities |
1,347.3 | (25.7 | ) | 125 | 2,120.4 | (236.7 | ) | 227 | ||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
390.3 | (3.3 | ) | 26 | 376.3 | (75.6 | ) | 60 | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
42.4 | (0.5 | ) | 11 | 269.3 | (15.6 | ) | 33 | ||||||||||||||||
Other debt obligations |
| | | 28.5 | (16.8 | ) | 8 | |||||||||||||||||
Total fixed maturities |
$ | 1,818.3 | $ | (30.4 | ) | 172 | $ | 3,101.5 | $ | (373.9 | ) | 378 | ||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
| | | 37.1 | (15.1 | ) | 5 | |||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,818.3 | $ | (30.4 | ) | 172 | $ | 3,138.6 | $ | (389.0 | ) | 383 | ||||||||||||
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | # of | Fair | Unrealized | # of | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Losses | Securities | Value | Losses | Securities | |||||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agencies |
$ | 2.2 | $ | (0.1 | ) | 1 | $ | | $ | | | |||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
67.7 | (1.9 | ) | 18 | 299.7 | (35.4 | ) | 49 | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate securities |
1,404.0 | (33.4 | ) | 151 | 2,504.0 | (360.3 | ) | 291 | ||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
579.9 | (9.4 | ) | 30 | 404.6 | (91.6 | ) | 65 | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
94.9 | (1.4 | ) | 11 | 622.8 | (59.3 | ) | 44 | ||||||||||||||||
Other debt obligations |
11.4 | (0.2 | ) | 3 | 28.2 | (17.4 | ) | 8 | ||||||||||||||||
Total fixed maturities |
$ | 2,160.1 | $ | (46.4 | ) | 214 | $ | 3,859.3 | $ | (564.0 | ) | 457 | ||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
| | | 36.3 | (16.0 | ) | 5 | |||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,160.1 | $ | (46.4 | ) | 214 | $ | 3,895.6 | $ | (580.0 | ) | 462 | ||||||||||||
Based on National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) ratings, as of March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009, the Company held below-investment-grade fixed maturities with fair values of
$1,080.1 and $1,032.1, respectively, and amortized costs of $1,169.3 and $1,165.1. These holdings
amounted to 5.6% of the Companys investments in fixed maturities at fair value as of both March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturities as of
March 31, 2010, by contractual years to maturity. Expected maturities will differ from contractual
maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without
prepayment penalties.
Cost or | ||||||||
Amortized | Fair | |||||||
Cost | Value | |||||||
One year or less |
$ | 688.7 | $ | 701.1 | ||||
Over one year through five years |
3,010.3 | 3,177.4 | ||||||
Over five years through ten years |
4,563.7 | 4,790.9 | ||||||
Over ten years |
5,225.5 | 5,122.4 | ||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
3,607.8 | 3,649.3 | ||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
1,711.9 | 1,774.8 | ||||||
Other asset-backed securities |
170.5 | 174.7 | ||||||
Total fixed maturities |
$ | 18,978.4 | $ | 19,390.6 | ||||
10
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
The following table summarizes the Companys net investment income:
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Fixed maturities |
$ | 271.0 | $ | 250.8 | ||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
0.6 | 0.4 | ||||||
Marketable equity securities, trading |
0.7 | 0.6 | ||||||
Mortgage loans |
18.8 | 16.0 | ||||||
Policy loans |
1.1 | 1.1 | ||||||
Investments in limited partnerships |
(1.2 | ) | (1.5 | ) | ||||
Other |
1.1 | 0.2 | ||||||
Total investment income |
292.1 | 267.6 | ||||||
Investment expenses |
(5.2 | ) | (4.9 | ) | ||||
Net investment income |
$ | 286.9 | $ | 262.7 | ||||
The following table summarizes the Companys net realized investment gains (losses):
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Fixed maturities: |
||||||||
Gross gains on sales |
$ | 10.4 | $ | 0.5 | ||||
Gross losses on sales |
(1.1 | ) | (0.6 | ) | ||||
Other-than-temporary impairments |
(9.7 | ) | (27.8 | ) | ||||
Other(1) |
2.3 | (4.3 | ) | |||||
Total fixed maturities |
1.9 | (32.2 | ) | |||||
Marketable equity securities, trading(2) |
7.6 | (15.3 | ) | |||||
Other invested assets |
(1.4 | ) | (1.6 | ) | ||||
Deferred policy acquisition costs adjustment |
(1.3 | ) | 6.1 | |||||
Net realized investment gains (losses) |
$ | 6.8 | $ | (43.0 | ) | |||
(1) | This includes gains (losses) on calls and redemptions, as well as changes in fair value of the Companys convertible securities totaling $2.5 and $0.1 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. | |
(2) | This includes $4.8 and $(15.0) of gains (losses) related to changes in fair value of trading securities held as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
The Companys review of investment securities for OTTI includes both quantitative and
qualitative criteria. Quantitative criteria include the length of time and amount that each
security is in an unrealized loss position (i.e., is underwater) and, for fixed maturities, whether
expected future cash flows indicate a credit loss exists.
While all securities are monitored for impairment, the Companys experience indicates that
securities for which the cost or amortized cost exceeds fair value by less than 20% do not
represent a significant risk of impairment and, often, fair values recover over time as the factors
that caused the declines improve. If the estimated fair value has declined and remained below cost
or amortized cost by 20% or more, the Company further analyzes the decrease in fair value to
determine whether it is an other-than-temporary decline in value. To make this determination for
each security, the Company considers, among other factors:
| Extent and duration of the decline in fair value below cost or amortized cost; | ||
| The financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer of the security, including any specific events that may affect its operations, earnings potential or compliance with terms and covenants of the security; | ||
| Changes in the financial condition of the securitys underlying collateral; | ||
| Any downgrades of the security by a rating agency; |
11
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
| Any reduction or elimination of dividends or nonpayment of scheduled interest payments; | ||
| Other indications that a credit loss has occurred; and | ||
| The Companys intent to sell a fixed maturity or whether it is more likely than not the Company will be required to sell the fixed maturity prior to recovery of its amortized cost, considering any regulatory developments and the Companys liquidity needs. |
For fixed maturities, if the Company determines that the present value of the cash flows
expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost of the security (i.e., a credit loss
exists), the Company concludes that an OTTI has occurred. In order to determine the amount of the
credit loss, the Company calculates the recovery value by performing a discounted cash flow
analysis based on the current expectations of future cash flows it expects to recover. The
discount rate is the effective interest rate implicit in the underlying fixed maturity. The
effective interest rate is the original yield for corporate securities, or current yield for
mortgage-backed securities.
Determination of Credit Losses on Corporate Securities
To determine the recovery value, credit loss and intent to sell for a corporate security, the
Company performs an analysis related to the underlying issuer including, but not limited to, the
following:
| Fundamentals of the issuer to determine what the Company would recover if the issuer were to file bankruptcy versus the price at which the market is trading; | ||
| Fundamentals of the industry in which the issuer operates; | ||
| Earnings multiples for the given industry or sector of the industry that the underlying issuer operates within, divided by the outstanding debt to determine an expected recovery value of the security in the case of a liquidation; | ||
| Expected cash flows of the issuer; | ||
| Expectations regarding defaults and recovery rates; | ||
| Changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency; and | ||
| Additional market information. |
Determination of Credit Losses on Mortgage-backed Securities
To determine the recovery value, credit loss and intent to sell for a mortgage-backed
security, including residential, commercial and other asset-backed securities, the Company performs
an analysis related to the underlying issuer including, but not limited to, the following:
| Discounted cash flow analysis based on the current and future cash flows the Company expects to recover; | ||
| Level of creditworthiness; | ||
| Delinquency ratios and loan-to-value ratios; | ||
| Average cumulative collateral loss, vintage year and level of subordination; | ||
| Susceptibility to fair value fluctuations due to changes in the interest rate environment; | ||
| Susceptibility to reinvestment risk in cases where market yields are lower than the book yield earned; | ||
| Susceptibility to reinvestment risk in cases where market yields are higher than the book yields earned and the Companys expectation of the sale of such security; and | ||
| Susceptibility to variability of prepayments. |
12
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
The following table presents the severity and duration of the gross unrealized losses on the
Companys underwater available-for-sale securities:
As of March 31, 2010 | As of December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||
Value | Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||
Fixed maturities |
||||||||||||||||
Underwater by 20% or more: |
||||||||||||||||
Less than 6 consecutive months |
$ | 71.5 | $ | (19.4 | ) | $ | 103.4 | $ | (28.4 | ) | ||||||
6 consecutive months or more |
309.8 | (131.9 | ) | 517.9 | (229.5 | ) | ||||||||||
Total underwater by 20% or more |
381.3 | (151.3 | ) | 621.3 | (257.9 | ) | ||||||||||
All other underwater fixed maturities |
4,538.5 | (253.0 | ) | 5,398.1 | (352.5 | ) | ||||||||||
Total underwater fixed maturities |
$ | 4,919.8 | $ | (404.3 | ) | $ | 6,019.4 | $ | (610.4 | ) | ||||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
||||||||||||||||
Underwater by 20% or more: |
||||||||||||||||
6 consecutive months or more |
$ | 16.3 | $ | (10.2 | ) | $ | 35.6 | $ | (15.9 | ) | ||||||
Total underwater by 20% or more |
16.3 | (10.2 | ) | 35.6 | (15.9 | ) | ||||||||||
All other underwater marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
20.8 | (4.9 | ) | 0.7 | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Total underwater marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
$ | 37.1 | $ | (15.1 | ) | $ | 36.3 | $ | (16.0 | ) | ||||||
As of March 31, 2010, $70.3, or 53.3%, of the gross unrealized losses on fixed maturities in
an unrealized loss position by 20% or more for a period of six months or more were investment-grade
securities. Unrealized losses on investment-grade securities are principally related to changes in
interest rates or changes in the issuer and the sector-related credit spreads since the securities
were acquired.
The Company reviewed its investments in fixed maturities with unrealized losses as of March
31, 2010 in accordance with its impairment policy. The Companys evaluation determined, after the
recognition of other-than-temporary impairments, that the remaining declines in fair value were
temporary, as it did not intend to sell these fixed maturities and it was not more likely than not
that it will be required to sell the fixed maturities before recovery of amortized cost. This
conclusion is supported by the Companys spread analysis, cash flow modeling and expected
continuation of contractually required principal and interest payments.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company did not intend to sell its underwater available-for-sale
marketable equity securities, primarily consisting of non-redeemable preferred stock, and it had
the intent and ability to hold them until recovery. Based on this analysis, including an evaluation
of the near term prospects of the issuer, the Company concluded that the declines in fair value of
these securities were temporary.
Changes in the amount of credit-related OTTI recognized in net income where the portion
related to other factors was recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 69.6 | $ | 73.0 | ||||
Increases recognized in the current period: |
||||||||
For which an OTTI was not previously recognized |
6.0 | 10.2 | ||||||
For which an OTTI was previously recognized |
1.5 | 8.4 | ||||||
Decreases attributable to: |
||||||||
Securities sold or paid down during the period |
(7.6 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||
Previously recognized credit losses on
securities impaired during the period due to a
change in intent to sell(1) |
| (5.4 | ) | |||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 69.5 | $ | 86.1 | ||||
(1) | Represents circumstances where the Company determined in the current period that it intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security prior to recovery of its amortized cost. |
13
Table of Contents
5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
The Company determines the fair value of its financial instruments based on the fair value
hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize its use of observable inputs and minimize the use
of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
The Company has categorized its financial instruments, based on the priority of the inputs to
the valuation technique, into the three-level hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest
priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the
lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The level in the fair value hierarchy within
which the fair value measurement falls is determined based on the lowest-level input that is
significant to the fair value measurement. The Companys financial assets recorded at fair value on
the consolidated balance sheets are categorized as follows:
| Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments. This level primarily consists of exchange-traded marketable equity securities and actively traded mutual fund investments. | ||
| Level 2 Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable. This level includes those financial instruments that are valued using industry-standard pricing methodologies, models or other valuation methodologies. All significant inputs are observable, derived from observable information in the marketplace or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the market place. Financial instruments in this category primarily include certain public and private corporate fixed maturities, government or agency securities and certain mortgage-backed securities. | ||
| Level 3 Instruments whose significant value drivers are unobservable. This comprises financial instruments for which fair value is estimated based on industry-standard pricing methodologies and internally developed models utilizing significant inputs not based on or corroborated by readily available market information. In limited circumstances, this category may also utilize non-binding broker quotes. This category primarily consists of certain less liquid fixed maturities, including corporate private placement securities, investments in private equity and hedge funds and trading securities where the Company cannot corroborate the significant valuation inputs with market observable data. |
The following tables present the financial instruments carried at fair value under the
valuation hierarchy described above for assets accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis.
The Company has no financial liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis:
As of March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 3 Percent | ||||||||||||||||
Types of Investments |
||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agencies |
$ | 44.1 | $ | | $ | 44.1 | $ | | | |||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
489.9 | | 482.5 | 7.4 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Corporate securities |
13,198.8 | | 12,292.0 | 906.8 | 4.4 | |||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
3,649.3 | | 3,388.5 | 260.8 | 1.3 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
1,774.8 | | 1,751.7 | 23.1 | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
Other debt obligations |
233.7 | | 222.9 | 10.8 | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale |
19,390.6 | | 18,181.7 | 1,208.9 | 5.9 | |||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
37.6 | 35.8 | | 1.8 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, trading |
151.0 | 150.5 | | 0.5 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||||
Short-term investments |
54.0 | 2.0 | 52.0 | | | |||||||||||||||
Investments in limited partnerships(1) |
25.2 | | | 25.2 | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
Other invested assets |
3.8 | | | 3.8 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||||
Total investments |
19,662.2 | 188.3 | 18,233.7 | 1,240.2 | 6.0 | |||||||||||||||
Separate account assets |
854.1 | 854.1 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 20,516.3 | $ | 1,042.4 | $ | 18,233.7 | $ | 1,240.2 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||
14
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
As of December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 3 Percent | ||||||||||||||||
Types of Investments |
||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agencies |
$ | 43.9 | $ | | $ | 43.9 | $ | | | |||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
483.0 | | 475.8 | 7.2 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Corporate securities |
12,548.6 | | 11,657.4 | 891.2 | 4.5 | |||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
3,536.4 | | 3,285.9 | 250.5 | 1.3 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
1,789.4 | | 1,765.4 | 24.0 | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
Other debt obligations |
193.0 | | 182.4 | 10.6 | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale |
18,594.3 | | 17,410.8 | 1,183.5 | 6.0 | |||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
36.7 | 34.9 | | 1.8 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, trading |
154.1 | 153.8 | | 0.3 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||||
Short-term investments |
2.1 | 2.1 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Investments in limited partnerships(1) |
24.7 | | | 24.7 | 0.2 | |||||||||||||||
Other invested assets |
4.6 | | | 4.6 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||||
Total investments |
18,816.5 | 190.8 | 17,410.8 | 1,214.9 | 6.2 | |||||||||||||||
Separate account assets |
840.1 | 840.1 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 19,656.6 | $ | 1,030.9 | $ | 17,410.8 | $ | 1,214.9 | 6.2 | % | ||||||||||
(1) | As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, this amount included investments in private equity and hedge funds. |
Fixed Maturities
The vast majority of the Companys fixed maturities have been classified as Level 2
measurements. To make this assessment, the Company determines whether the market for a security is
active and if significant pricing inputs are observable. The Company predominantly utilizes third
party independent pricing services to assist management in determining the fair value of its fixed
maturity securities. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, pricing services provided prices
for 93.8% and 93.6% of the Companys fixed maturities, respectively. Prices received from the
pricing services are not adjusted and multiple prices for these securities are not obtained. The
pricing services provide prices where observable inputs are available. If sufficient objectively
verifiable information about a securitys valuation is not available, the pricing services will not
provide a valuation for the security until they are able to obtain such information.
The Company analyzes the prices received from the pricing services to ensure that they
represent a reasonable estimate of fair value and to gain assurance on the overall reasonableness
and consistent application of input assumptions, valuation methodologies and compliance with
accounting standards for fair value determination. This analysis is performed through various
processes including evaluation of pricing methodologies and inputs, analytical reviews of certain
prices between reporting periods, and back-testing of selected sales activity to determine whether
there are any significant differences between the market price used to value the security prior to
sale and the actual sales prices.
In situations where the Company is unable to obtain sufficient market-observable information
upon which to estimate the fair value of a particular security, fair values are determined using
internal pricing models that typically utilize significant, unobservable market inputs or inputs
that are difficult to corroborate with observable market data. Such measurements are classified as
Level 3, and typically include private placements and other securities that the pricing services
are unable to price. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had $914.1, or 4.7%,
and $901.3, or 4.8%, of its fixed maturities invested in private placement securities,
respectively. The use of significant unobservable inputs in determining the fair value of the
Companys investments in private placement securities resulted in the classification of $825.6, or
90.3%, and $819.8, or 91.0%, of these privately placed securities as Level 3 measurements, as of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
15
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
Corporate Securities
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair value of the Companys corporate
securities classified as Level 2 measurements was $12,292.0 and $11,657.4, respectively. The
following table presents additional information about the composition of the Level 2 corporate
securities:
As of | As of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
% | # of | % | # of | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | of Total | Securities | Amount | of Total | Securities | |||||||||||||||||||
Significant Security Sectors: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrials |
$ | 2,179.8 | 17.7 | % | 209 | $ | 1,974.9 | 16.9 | % | 227 | ||||||||||||||
Utilities |
1,838.5 | 15.0 | 196 | 1,771.6 | 15.2 | 216 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financials |
1,807.8 | 14.7 | 231 | 1,760.2 | 15.1 | 286 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer staples |
1,782.5 | 14.5 | 135 | 1,731.0 | 14.8 | 150 | ||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average coupon rate |
6.5 | % | 6.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average remaining years to contractual maturity |
13.0 | 13.3 |
Corporate securities classified as Level 2 measurements are priced by independent pricing
services, who utilize evaluated pricing models. The significant inputs for security evaluations
include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets,
benchmark securities, bids, offers and other reference data, including market research
publications. Because many corporate securities do not trade on a daily basis, evaluated pricing
applications apply available information through processes such as benchmark curves, benchmarking
of like securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing to prepare evaluations.
As of March 31, 2010, 88.7% of the Level 3 corporate securities were privately placed
securities. These securities were issued by entities primarily in the financials sector, 24.3%, the
industrials sector, 22.1%, and the materials sector, 15.4%.
As of December 31, 2009, 89.6% of the Level 3 corporate securities were privately placed
securities. These securities were issued by entities primarily in the financials sector, 22.4% the
industrials sector, 22.7%, and the materials sector, 15.2%.
The following table presents additional information about the quality of the Level 3 privately
placed corporate securities:
As of March 31, 2010 | As of December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
Fair | % of Total | Fair | % of Total | |||||||||||||||||
NAIC Rating | Comparable Standard & Poors rating | Value | Fair Value | Value | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||
1 |
AAA, AA, A | $ | 153.8 | 19.1 | % | $ | 153.5 | 19.2 | % | |||||||||||
2 |
BBB | 559.7 | 69.6 | 557.4 | 69.8 | |||||||||||||||
3 6 |
BB & below | 90.5 | 11.3 | 87.3 | 11.0 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 804.0 | 100.0 | % | $ | 798.2 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
The valuation of these privately placed Level 3 corporate securities requires significant
judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices, the inherent lack of liquidity and the
duration of such assets. The fair values of these assets were determined using a discounted cash
flow approach. The discount rate was based on the current Treasury curve, adjusted for credit and
liquidity factors. The credit factor adjustment, which is based on credit spreads to the Treasury
curve for similar securities, varies for each security based on its quality and industry or sector.
The appropriate illiquidity adjustment is estimated based on illiquidity spreads observed in
transactions involving similar securities. As of March 31, 2010, the range of illiquidity
adjustments varied from 0 to 50 basis points.
Residential Mortgage-backed Securities
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair value of the Companys residential
mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) classified as Level 2 measurements was $3,388.5 and $3,285.9,
respectively. These securities were primarily fixed-rate, with a weighted-average coupon rate of
5.3% and 5.4% as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
16
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
Agency securities comprised 85.7% and 84.7% of the Companys Level 2 RMBS as of March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively. The following table presents additional information about the
composition of the Level 2 non-agency RMBS securities:
As of | As of | |||||||||||||||
March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Amount | % of Total | Amount | % of Total | |||||||||||||
Standard & Poors equivalent rating: |
||||||||||||||||
AAA |
$ | 177.4 | 36.6 | % | $ | 200.8 | 39.9 | % | ||||||||
AA through BBB |
116.6 | 24.1 | 140.2 | 27.8 | ||||||||||||
BB & below |
190.0 | 39.3 | 162.7 | 32.3 | ||||||||||||
Total Non-agency RMBS |
$ | 484.0 | 100.0 | % | $ | 503.7 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Non-agency RMBS with super senior subordination |
$ | 294.3 | 60.8 | % | $ | 300.3 | 59.6 | % |
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Companys non-agency Level 2 RMBS had a
weighted-average credit enhancement of 9.8%, and $187.0 and $191.3, or 38.6% and 38.0%,
respectively, had an origination or vintage year of 2004 and prior.
Level 2 RMBS securities are priced by independent pricing services, who utilize evaluated
pricing models. The significant inputs for security evaluations include benchmark yields, reported
trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers
and other reference data, including market research publications. Because many RMBS do not trade on
a daily basis, evaluated pricing applications apply available information through processes such as
benchmark curves, benchmarking of like securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing to prepare
evaluations. In addition, the pricing services use models and processes to develop prepayment and
interest rate scenarios. The pricing services monitor market indicators, industry and economic
events, and their models take into account market convention.
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Companys Level 3 RMBS consisted of four
agency securities backed by home equity conversion mortgages. The fair value of these securities
was determined using an income approach. The significant inputs for the valuation model included a
prepayment rate and a spread assumption that was based on observable transactions. The Company uses
a standard prepayment speed ramp, in which the conditional prepayment rate, or CPR, is modeled to
increase over the life of the loans. These securities accrete interest at a stated pass-through
rate. Although it is uncertain when an underlying loan will pay off in full, the issuer is required
to purchase the loan out of the pool if it accretes to a contractually specified amount. As of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, these securities had expected maturities ranging from 8 to 10
years.
Commercial Mortgage-backed Securities
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair value of the Companys commercial
mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) classified as Level 2 measurements was $1,751.7 and $1,765.4,
respectively. These were primarily non-agency securities, which comprised 75.2% and 76.8% of Level
2 CMBS as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The non-agency CMBS had an
estimated weighted-average credit enhancement of 28.8% and 27.8% as of March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009, respectively, and 92.2% and 92.4%, respectively, were in the most senior tranche.
The Companys Level 2 CMBS had a weighted-average coupon rate of 5.6% as of both March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2010, 18.5% of the underlying collateral for these
securities was located in New York, 13.9% was located in California, and 7.0% was located in Texas.
The underlying collateral primarily consisted of shopping centers and retail/office buildings,
comprising 34.1% and 31.3%, respectively, as of March 31, 2010.
Level 2 CMBS securities are priced by independent pricing services, who utilize evaluated
pricing models. The significant inputs for security evaluations include benchmark yields, reported
trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids,
offers, new issues, monthly payment information and other reference data, including market research
publications. Because many CMBS do not trade on a daily basis, evaluated pricing applications apply
available information through processes, such as benchmark curves, benchmarking of like securities,
sector groupings and matrix pricing, to prepare evaluations.
17
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
Marketable Equity Securities
Marketable equity securities are primarily investments in common stock and certain
nonredeemable preferred stocks and mutual fund assets, which consist of investments in publicly
traded companies and actively traded mutual fund investments. The fair values of the Companys
marketable equity securities are based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical
assets and are primarily classified as Level 1.
The Company manages a trading portfolio of marketable equity securities, comprised mostly of
investments in common stock. Certain nonredeemable preferred stock are reported as
available-for-sale. Investment gains and losses on trading securities, including changes in fair
value, are reported in the consolidated statements of income as net realized investment gains
(losses). The Company believes this presents its investment results for these securities on a basis
that is consistent with managements operating principles, as the Company considers changes in fair
value on its marketable equity securities when evaluating its performance.
Short-term Investments
Short-term investments consist of highly liquid debt instruments with remaining maturities of
greater than three months and less than twelve months when purchased. The carrying value
approximates fair value.
Investments in Limited Partnerships
Investments in limited partnerships recorded at fair value are investments in private equity
and hedge funds. The Company utilizes the fair value option for these investments, regardless of
ownership percentage, to standardize the related accounting and reporting.
The fair value for the Companys investments in private equity and hedge funds is based upon
the Companys proportionate interest in the underlying partnership or funds net asset value (NAV),
which is deemed to approximate fair value. The Company is generally unable to liquidate these
investments during the term of the partnership or fund, which range from five to twelve years. As
such, the Company classifies these securities as Level 3 measurements.
Other Invested Assets
Other invested assets recorded at fair value primarily consist of life settlement investments
and S&P 500 Index options. The carrying value of these assets approximates fair value.
Separate Accounts
Separate account assets are primarily invested in mutual funds with published NAVs, which are
included in Level 1.
Rollforward of Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis Using Significant
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
The following table presents additional information about assets measured at fair value on a
recurring basis and for which the Company has utilized significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) to
determine fair value between January 1, 2010 and March 31, 2010:
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers In | Included in: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as | and/or | Other | Realized | Balance as of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
of January 1, | (Out) of | Net | Comprehensive | Gains | March 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | Purchases | Sales | Level 3(1) | Other(3) | Income(2) | Income | (Losses)(2) | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Types of Investments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
$ | 7.2 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 0.2 | $ | | $ | 7.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate securities |
891.2 | 16.0 | (17.3 | ) | 8.1 | (2.5 | ) | | 13.0 | (1.7 | ) | 906.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
250.5 | | | | 2.7 | | 7.6 | | 260.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
24.0 | | | | (1.9 | ) | | 1.0 | | 23.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other debt obligations |
10.6 | | | | (0.3 | ) | | 0.5 | | 10.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale |
1,183.5 | 16.0 | (17.3 | ) | 8.1 | (2.0 | ) | | 22.3 | (1.7 | ) | 1,208.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
1.8 | | | | | | | | 1.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, trading |
0.3 | | | | 0.2 | | | | 0.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments in limited partnerships |
24.7 | 0.6 | (1.0 | ) | | | 0.8 | | 0.1 | 25.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other invested assets |
4.6 | | (0.3 | ) | | (0.8 | ) | 0.2 | | 0.1 | 3.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Level 3 |
$ | 1,214.9 | $ | 16.6 | $ | (18.6 | ) | $ | 8.1 | $ | (2.6 | ) | $ | 1.0 | $ | 22.3 | $ | (1.5 | ) | $ | 1,240.2 | |||||||||||||||
18
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(1) | Transfers into and/or out of Level 3 are reported at the value as of the beginning of the period in which the transfer occurs. Gross transfers into and out of Level 3 were $10.3 and $(2.2), respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2010. | |
(2) | Realized and unrealized gains and losses for investments in limited partnerships are included in net investment income. All other realized and unrealized gains and losses are included in net realized investment gains (losses). | |
(3) | Other is comprised of transactions such as pay downs, calls, amortization, and redemptions. |
The following table presents additional information about assets measured at fair value
on a recurring basis and for which the Company has utilized significant unobservable inputs (Level
3) to determine fair value between January 1, 2009 and March 31, 2009:
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers In | Included in: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as | and/or | Other | Realized | Balance as of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
of January 1, | (Out) of | Net | Comprehensive | Gains | March 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | Purchases | Sales | Level 3(1) | Other(3) | Income(2) | Loss | (Losses)(2) | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Types of Investments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
$ | 6.3 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 0.2 | $ | | $ | 6.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate securities |
631.6 | 52.3 | | | (4.8 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (13.3 | ) | (1.0 | ) | 664.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
24.4 | | | (0.7 | ) | (0.9 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | | 22.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other debt obligations |
12.0 | | | | (0.5 | ) | | 1.4 | | 12.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale |
674.3 | 52.3 | | (0.7 | ) | (6.2 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (11.9 | ) | (1.0 | ) | 706.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
| | | 5.3 | | | (3.5 | ) | | 1.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, trading |
0.2 | | | | | (0.1 | ) | | | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments in limited partnerships |
56.3 | 2.5 | (0.6 | ) | | | 0.8 | | | 59.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other invested assets |
2.4 | | | | | (1.5 | ) | | | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Level 3 |
$ | 733.2 | $ | 54.8 | $ | (0.6 | ) | $ | 4.6 | $ | (6.2 | ) | $ | (0.9 | ) | $ | (15.4 | ) | $ | (1.0 | ) | $ | 768.5 | |||||||||||||
(1) | Transfers into and/or out of Level 3 are reported as the value as of the beginning of the period in which the transfer occurs. Gross transfers into and out of Level 3 were $5.3 and $(0.7), respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2009. | |
(2) | Realized and unrealized gains and losses for investments in limited partnerships are included in net investment income. All other realized and unrealized gains and losses are included in net realized investment gains (losses). | |
(3) | Other is comprised of transactions such as pay downs, calls, amortization, and redemptions. |
The following table summarizes the carrying or reported values and corresponding fair
values of financial instruments subject to fair value disclosure requirements:
As of March 31, 2010 | As of December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Carrying | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Fair Value | Amount | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Financial assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturities |
$ | 19,360.6 | $ | 19,360.6 | $ | 18,594.3 | $ | 18,594.3 | ||||||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
37.6 | 37.6 | 36.7 | 36.7 | ||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, trading |
151.0 | 151.0 | 154.1 | 154.1 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage loans |
1,228.0 | 1,218.1 | 1,201.7 | 1,190.1 | ||||||||||||
Short-term investments |
54.0 | 54.0 | 2.1 | 2.1 | ||||||||||||
Investments in limited partnerships: |
||||||||||||||||
Hedge funds and private equity funds |
25.2 | 25.2 | 24.7 | 24.7 | ||||||||||||
Affordable housing |
105.4 | 107.0 | 85.5 | 89.9 | ||||||||||||
Other invested assets |
9.1 | 9.1 | 10.1 | 10.1 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
389.3 | 389.3 | 257.8 | 257.8 | ||||||||||||
Separate account assets |
854.1 | 854.1 | 840.1 | 840.1 | ||||||||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Funds held under deposit contracts: |
||||||||||||||||
Deferred annuities |
7,545.8 | 7,449.4 | 7,212.1 | 7,128.2 | ||||||||||||
Immediate annuities |
6,736.3 | 6,938.8 | 6,724.4 | 6,937.8 | ||||||||||||
Notes payable: |
||||||||||||||||
Capital Efficient Notes (CENts) |
149.8 | 132.5 | 149.8 | 118.5 | ||||||||||||
Senior notes |
299.1 | 299.1 | 299.1 | 276.8 |
19
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
Other Financial Instruments
Cash and cash equivalents were reported at cost, which approximates fair value. Cash
equivalents were $329.6 and $244.4 as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. As of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, $326.1 and $223.8 of total cash equivalents, respectively,
were held at a single highly rated financial institution.
The fair values of the Companys mortgage loans were measured by discounting the projected
future cash flows using the current rate at which the loans would be made to borrowers with similar
credit ratings and for the same maturities.
Investments in limited partnerships associated with affordable housing projects and state tax
credit funds were carried at amortized cost. Fair value was estimated based on the discounted cash
flows over the remaining life of the tax credits.
The Company estimates the fair values of funds held under deposit contracts related to
investment-type contracts using an income approach based on the present value of the discounted
cash flows. Cash flows were projected using best estimates for lapses, mortality and expenses, and
discounted at a risk-free rate plus a nonperformance risk spread. The carrying value of this
balance excludes $4,940.8 and $4,880.2 of liabilities related to insurance contracts as of March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
The fair values of the Companys notes payable were based on quoted prices for similar
instruments. The fair value measurement assumes that liabilities were transferred to a market
participant of equal credit standing and without consideration for any optional redemption feature.
6. Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance for deferred
policy acquisition costs:
For the Three | ||||||||
Months Ended | For the Year Ended | |||||||
March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
Unamortized balance at beginning of period |
$ | 325.7 | $ | 219.5 | ||||
Deferral of acquisition costs |
30.5 | 148.3 | ||||||
Adjustments related to investment (gains) losses |
(1.0 | ) | 9.3 | |||||
Amortization |
(15.4 | ) | (51.4 | ) | ||||
Unamortized balance at end of period |
339.8 | 325.7 | ||||||
Accumulated effect of net unrealized investment gains |
(112.3 | ) | (75.3 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 227.5 | $ | 250.4 | ||||
7. Deferred Sales Inducements
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance for deferred
sales inducements, which are included in other assets:
For the Three | ||||||||
Months Ended | For the Year Ended | |||||||
March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
Unamortized balance at beginning of period |
$ | 67.6 | $ | 33.0 | ||||
Capitalizations |
13.3 | 42.5 | ||||||
Adjustments related to investment (gains) losses |
(0.3 | ) | 2.4 | |||||
Amortization |
(3.9 | ) | (10.3 | ) | ||||
Unamortized balance at end of period |
76.7 | 67.6 | ||||||
Accumulated effect of net unrealized investment gains |
(29.7 | ) | (18.4 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 47.0 | $ | 49.2 | ||||
20
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
8. Stockholders Equity
The components of comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 46.3 | $ | 5.1 | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes: |
||||||||
Changes in unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities(1) |
244.9 | (112.6 | ) | |||||
Reclassification adjustment for net realized investment (gains) losses included in net income(2) |
(6.1 | ) | 30.9 | |||||
Adjustment for deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements valuation allowance(3) |
(31.4 | ) | 4.4 | |||||
Other-than-temporary-impairments on fixed maturities not related to credit losses(4) |
1.8 | (15.5 | ) | |||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
209.2 | (92.8 | ) | |||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 255.5 | $ | (87.7 | ) | |||
(1) | Net of taxes of $131.9 and $(60.6) for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. | |
(2) | Net of taxes of $(3.3) and $16.6 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, $7.1 (net of taxes of $3.9) of the reclassification adjustment is related to losses previously classified as OTTI not related to credit losses. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the reclassification adjustment did not include any OTTI not related to credit losses. | |
(3) | Net of taxes of $(16.9) and $2.5 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. | |
(4) | Net of taxes of $1.0 and $(8.4) for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
The following table provides a reconciliation of changes in outstanding shares of common
stock, in whole shares:
Common Shares | ||||
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
92,646,295 | |||
Restricted shares(2) |
83,160 | |||
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
92,729,455 | |||
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
92,729,455 | |||
Common stock, issued(1) |
25,259,510 | |||
Restricted shares(2) |
97,054 | |||
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
118,086,019 | |||
(1) | In January 2010, the Company issued common stock in an initial public offering. See Note 1 for further discussion. | |
(2) | Represents restricted shares issued pursuant to the Companys Equity Plan. |
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Investments in Limited Partnerships
In March, 2010, the Company invested in a new limited partnership interest related to federal
affordable housing projects. The Company unconditionally committed to provide capital
contributions totaling $25.0. As of March 31, 2010, the Company contributed $3.4 and is expected to
contribute the remaining $21.6 over the next 3 years. The present value of these unfunded
contributions is recorded in other liabilities.
Litigation
Because of the nature of its business, the Company is subject to legal actions filed or
threatened in the ordinary course of its business operations. The Company does not expect that any
such litigation, pending or threatened, as of March 31, 2010, will have a material adverse effect
on its consolidated financial condition, future operating results or liquidity.
21
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
Other Commitments
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, unfunded mortgage loan commitments were $32.7 and
$4.5, respectively. The Company had no other material commitments or contingencies as of March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009.
10. Segment Information
The following tables present selected financial information by segment and reconcile segment
pre-tax adjusted operating income (loss) to amounts reported in the consolidated statements of
income.
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement | Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Group | Services | Annuities | Individual | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Premiums |
$ | 108.8 | $ | | $ | | $ | 10.2 | $ | | $ | 119.0 | ||||||||||||
Net investment income |
4.6 | 107.8 | 104.0 | 66.1 | 4.4 | 286.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Policy fees, contract charges, and other |
2.9 | 4.8 | 0.2 | 29.1 | 3.5 | 40.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net investment gains on FIA options |
| 0.1 | | | | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total operating revenues |
116.3 | 112.7 | 104.2 | 105.4 | 7.9 | 446.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Benefits and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Policyholder benefits and claims |
75.0 | 0.1 | | 11.1 | | 86.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest credited |
| 68.5 | 92.0 | 58.5 | (0.5 | ) | 218.5 | |||||||||||||||||
Other underwriting and operating expenses |
23.7 | 13.6 | 5.3 | 12.7 | 4.3 | 59.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | | 8.0 | 8.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
1.9 | 13.2 | 0.5 | (0.2 | ) | | 15.4 | |||||||||||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
100.6 | 95.4 | 97.8 | 82.1 | 11.8 | 387.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Segment pre-tax adjusted operating income (loss) |
$ | 15.7 | $ | 17.3 | $ | 6.4 | $ | 23.3 | $ | (3.9 | ) | $ | 58.8 | |||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | 116.3 | $ | 112.7 | $ | 104.2 | $ | 105.4 | $ | 7.9 | $ | 446.5 | ||||||||||||
Add: Net realized investment gains (losses), excluding
FIA options |
(0.2 | ) | 3.0 | 4.7 | 0.2 | (1.0 | ) | 6.7 | ||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
116.1 | 115.7 | 108.9 | 105.6 | 6.9 | 453.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
100.6 | 95.4 | 97.8 | 82.1 | 11.8 | 387.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
$ | 15.5 | $ | 20.3 | $ | 11.1 | $ | 23.5 | $ | (4.9 | ) | $ | 65.5 | |||||||||||
As of March 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 258.8 | $ | 8,810.2 | $ | 6,718.3 | $ | 5,226.7 | $ | 2,349.7 | $ | 23,363.7 |
22
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement | Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Group | Services | Annuities | Individual | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Premiums |
$ | 109.7 | $ | | $ | | $ | 9.8 | $ | | $ | 119.5 | ||||||||||||
Net investment income |
4.5 | 83.0 | 106.3 | 64.1 | 4.8 | 262.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Policy fees, contract charges, and other |
4.1 | 3.8 | 0.2 | 29.2 | 2.3 | 39.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net investment losses on FIA options |
| (1.4 | ) | | | | (1.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total operating revenues |
118.3 | 85.4 | 106.5 | 103.1 | 7.1 | 420.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Benefits and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Policyholder benefits and claims |
76.9 | (0.5 | ) | | 18.0 | | 94.4 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest credited |
| 55.6 | 86.7 | 53.9 | (0.6 | ) | 195.6 | |||||||||||||||||
Other underwriting and operating expenses |
27.9 | 13.5 | 5.0 | 13.5 | 3.1 | 63.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | | 7.9 | 7.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
2.0 | 7.8 | 0.4 | 0.5 | | 10.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
106.8 | 76.4 | 92.1 | 85.9 | 10.4 | 371.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Segment pre-tax adjusted operating income (loss) |
$ | 11.5 | $ | 9.0 | $ | 14.4 | $ | 17.2 | $ | (3.3 | ) | $ | 48.8 | |||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | 118.3 | $ | 85.4 | $ | 106.5 | $ | 103.1 | $ | 7.1 | $ | 420.4 | ||||||||||||
Add: Net realized investment losses, excluding
FIA options |
(0.1 | ) | (12.1 | ) | (24.0 | ) | (4.8 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (41.6 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
118.2 | 73.3 | 82.5 | 98.3 | 6.5 | 378.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
106.8 | 76.4 | 92.1 | 85.9 | 10.4 | 371.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
$ | 11.4 | $ | (3.1 | ) | $ | (9.6 | ) | $ | 12.4 | $ | (3.9 | ) | $ | 7.2 | |||||||||
As of March 31, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 275.5 | $ | 6,856.7 | $ | 6,083.5 | $ | 4,786.8 | $ | 1,946.2 | $ | 19,948.7 |
11. Subsequent Events
On May 12, 2010, the Company declared a dividend of $0.05 per common share, or approximately
$6.9 in total, to shareholders and warrant holders of record as of May 26, 2010. The dividend will
be paid on June 9, 2010.
23
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this report on Form 10-Q to Symetra
refer to Symetra Financial Corporation on a stand-alone, non-consolidated basis. References to
we, our, us and the Company are to Symetra Financial Corporation together with its
subsidiaries.
This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our
actual results may differ materially from those discussed in or implied by any of the
forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including but not limited to those
listed under Forward-Looking Statements. You should read the following discussion in conjunction
with the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and accompanying condensed notes
included in Item 1 Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q, as well as our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the SEC on March 8, 2010
(2009 10-K), as well as our current reports on Form 8-K and other publicly available information.
Our fiscal year ends on December 31 of each calendar year.
Management considers certain non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted operating income,
adjusted book value, adjusted book value per common share, adjusted book value per common share, as
converted, and operating ROAE to be useful to investors in evaluating our financial performance and
condition. These measures have been reconciled to their most comparable GAAP financial measures.
For a definition of these non-GAAP measures, see Use of non-GAAP Financial Measures.
All amounts, except per share data, are in millions unless otherwise stated.
Overview
We are a financial services company in the life insurance industry focused on profitable
growth in selected group health, retirement, life insurance and employee benefits markets. Our
operations date back to 1957 and many of our agency and distribution relationships have been in
place for decades.
On January 27, 2010, we completed the initial public offering (IPO) of our common stock at an
offering price of $12.00 per share. The IPO included 25.3 newly issued shares of common stock sold
by us, and 9.7 existing shares of common stock sold by selling stockholders. We received net
proceeds from the offering of $282.5. We did not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by
the selling stockholders.
Our Operations
We conduct our business through five segments, four of which are operating: | |||
| Group. We offer medical stop-loss insurance, limited benefit medical plans, group life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment insurance and disability income insurance mainly to employer groups of 50 to 5,000 individuals. In addition to our insurance products, we offer managing general underwriting services. | ||
| Retirement Services. We offer fixed and variable deferred annuities, including tax sheltered annuities, individual retirement accounts, or IRAs, and group annuities to qualified retirement plans, including Section 401(k), 403(b) and 457 plans. | ||
| Income Annuities. We offer single premium immediate annuities, or SPIAs, for customers seeking a reliable source of retirement income and structured settlement annuities to fund third-party personal injury settlements. In addition, we offer funding services options to existing structured settlement clients. | ||
| Individual. We offer a wide array of term and universal life insurance as well as bank-owned life insurance, or BOLI. | ||
| Other. This segment consists of unallocated corporate income, composed primarily of investment income on unallocated surplus, returns from our investments in limited partnerships, unallocated corporate expenses, interest expense on debt, tax credits from our tax preferred affordable housing investments, the results of small, non-insurance businesses that are managed outside of our operating segments, and inter-segment elimination entries. |
24
Table of Contents
Current Outlook
The capital and credit markets continued to improve in the first quarter of 2010 after a
period of extreme volatility and disruption that affected equity market returns, interest rates,
liquidity, access to capital, and the cost of capital. The equity markets also continued to improve
with several successful initial public offerings and overall market appreciation. Bond valuations
improved as credit spreads to treasury continued to shrink.
Despite the general market improvements, we continue to be challenged with fully investing our
excess cash as assets with the necessary yields and quality are difficult to obtain because of
scarce supply and significant demand. The low interest rate environment and tight credit spreads
have been a challenge for our various asset-based businesses. Our Income Annuities and BOLI
investment portfolios were impacted as we reinvested in assets with lower yields than we were
earning previously.
Although there is broad concern regarding commercial real estate loans, we believe our
mortgage loan portfolio and commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) are high quality with
sound underwriting, strong cash flows, and significant credit enhancement. We do not anticipate we
will be immune to commercial real estate losses; however, given the structure of our mortgage loan
and CMBS portfolios, we believe our strategies have minimized our exposure to future losses.
On March 23, 2010, President Obama signed into law The Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act (PPACA), which brings substantial change to insurance coverage for medical costs. While many of
the changes do not take effect until January 1, 2014, some take effect for plan years beginning on
or after September 23, 2010. Based upon our review of the current legislation, we see opportunities
for continued growth in our group medical stop-loss product following its implementation; however,
details of the PPACA are unclear and it is thus difficult to predict its full impact on us.
Accordingly, we will continue to monitor the implementation of the PPACA and will adjust our
business strategies as needed. See Item 1A Risk Factors for further discussion.
During the first quarter of 2010, we continued to concentrate on developing new distribution
partners, especially in our financial institutions channel. In addition, we launched more products
through previously existing distribution partners. Our sales increased from fourth quarter 2009
levels with production from a wide variety of distribution partners. To succeed in this and other
economic environments, we expect to continue focusing on our strategic objectives of: expanding
distribution by adding new partners and adding products with existing partners; developing simple
to understand products that capitalize on favorable demographic trends such as the need for
retirement savings and affordable health care; disciplined balance sheet management; and effective
deployment of our IPO proceeds. However, the success of these and other strategies may be affected
by the factors discussed in Item 1A Risk Factors and other factors as discussed herein.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to adopt
accounting policies and make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the
unaudited interim consolidated financial statements. The following accounting policies are those we
consider to be particularly critical to understanding our financial statements because their
application places the most significant demands on our ability to judge the effect of inherently
uncertain matters on our financial results:
| Valuation of investments at fair value; | ||
| The evaluation of OTTI of investments; | ||
| The balance, recoverability and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs; | ||
| The liabilities for funds held under deposit contracts, future policy benefits, and policy and contract claims; and | ||
| The recoverability of deferred tax assets. |
In applying the Companys accounting policies, management makes subjective and complex
judgments that frequently require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. Many of
these policies, estimates and related judgments are common in the insurance and financial services
industries; others are specific to the Companys businesses and operations. For all of these
policies, we caution that future events rarely develop exactly as forecast, and our best estimates
may require adjustment.
25
Table of Contents
There have been no material changes to the above critical accounting estimates, which are
described in Item 7 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates and Note 2 of the notes to the audited
financial statements included in the 2009 10-K.
New Accounting Standards
For a discussion of recently adopted and not yet adopted accounting pronouncements, see Note 2
in the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.
Sources of Revenues and Expenses
Our primary sources of revenues from our insurance operations are premiums and net investment
income. Our primary sources of expenses from our insurance operations are policyholder benefits and
claims, interest credited to policyholder reserves and account balances and general business and
operating expenses, net of deferred acquisition costs. We also generate net realized investment
gains (losses) on sales or impairment of our investments and changes in fair value of our equity
trading portfolio.
Each of our four operating segments maintains its own portfolio of invested assets, which are
centrally managed. The net investment income and net realized investment gains (losses) are
reported in the segment in which they occur. We also allocate surplus net investment income to each
segment using a risk-based capital formula. The unallocated portion of net investment income is
reported in our Other segment. In addition, we allocate certain corporate expenses to each
operating segment using multiple factors, including employee headcount, allocated investments,
account values and time study results.
Revenues
Premiums
Premiums consists primarily of premiums from our group life and health and individual life
insurance products.
Net investment income
Net investment income represents the income earned on our investments, net of investment
expenses, including gains or losses from changes in the fair value of our investments in limited
partnerships, primarily private equity and hedge funds.
Policy fees, contract charges and other
Policy fees, contract charges and other includes mortality expense, surrender and other
administrative charges to policyholders, revenues from our non-insurance businesses, reinsurance
allowance fees, and cost of insurance (COI) charges on our universal life insurance and BOLI
policies.
Net realized investment gains (losses)
Net realized investment gains (losses) mainly consists of realized gains (losses) from sales
of our investments, realized losses from investment impairments and changes in fair value of our
trading portfolio and fixed income annuity (FIA) options.
Benefits and Expenses
Policyholder benefits and claims
Policyholder benefits and claims consist of benefits paid and reserve activity on group life
and health and individual life products. In addition, in accordance with the purchase method of
accounting (referred to as PGAAP), we record, as a reduction of this expense, PGAAP reserve
amortization related to our BOLI policies. PGAAP reserve amortization related to our fixed deferred
annuities was recorded in this line item until it was fully amortized as of September 30, 2009.
Interest credited
Interest credited represents interest credited to policyholder reserves and contractholder
general account balances.
26
Table of Contents
Other underwriting and operating expenses
Other underwriting and operating expenses represent non-deferrable costs related to the
acquisition and ongoing maintenance of insurance and investment contracts, including certain
non-deferrable commissions, policy issuance expenses and other general operating costs.
Interest expense
Interest expense primarily includes interest on corporate debt, the impact of interest rate
hedging activities and amortization of debt issuance costs.
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs
We defer as assets certain costs, generally commissions, distribution costs and other
underwriting costs, that vary with, and are primarily related to, the production of new and renewal
business. Amortization of previously capitalized DAC is recorded as an expense.
Use of non-GAAP Financial Measures
Certain tables and related disclosures in this report include non-GAAP financial measures. We
believe these measures provide useful information to investors in evaluating our financial
performance or condition. In addition, our management and board of directors use these measures to
gauge the historical performance of our operations and for business planning purposes. In the
tables below, we present these measures and provide reconciliations to the nearest GAAP financial
measure. In the following paragraphs, we provide definitions of these non-GAAP measures and explain
how we believe investors will find them useful, how we use them, what their limitations are, and
how we compensate for such limitations.
As of | As of | |||||||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Total stockholders equity |
$ | 1,971.7 | $ | 1,433.3 | ||||
Less: AOCI |
159.5 | (49.7 | ) | |||||
Adjusted book value* |
1,812.2 | 1,483.0 | ||||||
Add: Assumed proceeds from exercise of warrants |
218.1 | 218.1 | ||||||
Adjusted book value, as converted* |
$ | 2,030.3 | $ | 1,701.1 | ||||
Book value per common share |
$ | 14.39 | $ | 12.83 | ||||
Adjusted book value per common share* |
$ | 15.35 | $ | 15.99 | ||||
Adjusted book value per common share, as converted* |
$ | 14.81 | $ | 15.23 | ||||
For the Twelve Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Return on stockholders equity, ROE |
14.5 | % | 15.4 | % | ||||
Average stockholders equity |
$ | 1,169.5 | $ | 832.4 | ||||
Operating return on average equity, or ROAE* |
10.5 | % | 10.5 | % | ||||
Average adjusted book value* |
$ | 1,502.4 | $ | 1,407.8 |
* | Represents non-GAAP measures |
Adjusted Operating Income
Adjusted operating income is a non-GAAP measure of our performance. Adjusted operating income
consists of net income, less after-tax net realized investment gains (losses), plus after-tax net
investment gains (losses) on our FIA options.
27
Table of Contents
Net income is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to adjusted operating income. Net
income for any period presents the results of our insurance operations, as well as our net realized
investment gains (losses). We consider investment income generated by our invested assets to be
part of the results of our insurance operations because they are acquired and generally held to
maturity to generate income that we use to meet our obligations. Conversely, we do not consider the
activities reported through net realized investment gains (losses), with the exception of our FIA
options, to be reflective of the performance of our insurance operations, as discussed below.
We believe investors find it useful to review a measure of the results of our insurance
operations separate from the net realized gain and loss activity attributable to most of our
investment portfolio because it assists an investor in determining whether our insurance-related
revenues, composed primarily of premiums; net investment income; and policy fees, contract charges
and other, have been sufficient to generate operating earnings after meeting our insurance-related
obligations, composed primarily of claims paid to policyholders, investment returns credited to
policyholder accounts, and other operating costs.
In presenting adjusted operating income, we are excluding after-tax net realized investment
gains (losses). Even though these gains and losses recur in most periods, the timing and amount are
driven by investment decisions and external economic developments unrelated to our management of
the insurance and underwriting aspects of our business. Thus, because our insurance operations are
not dependent on the following, we exclude from adjusted operating income the following items which
are recorded in after-tax net realized investment gains (losses):
| OTTI related to available-for-sale securities, which depend on the timing and severity of market credit cycles and management judgments regarding recoverability; | ||
| Net gains (losses) on changes in fair value of our trading securities, which depend on equity market performance and broader market conditions; and | ||
| Net realized gains (losses) on sales of securities, which are subject to our discretion and influenced by market opportunities. |
The one exception to the exclusion of net realized investment gains (losses) is the gains
(losses) on our FIA options in our Retirement Services segment. Each year, we use the realized
gains from our FIA options, similar to the way we use investment income, to meet our obligations
associated with our FIA product, which credits interest to policyholder accounts based on equity
market performance.
In addition to using adjusted operating income to evaluate our insurance operations, our
management and board of directors have other uses for this measure, including managing our
insurance liabilities and assessing achievement of our financial plan. For instance, we use
adjusted operating income to help determine the renewal interest rates we can afford to credit to
policyholders. We also develop a financial plan that includes our expectation of adjusted operating
income. We review our achievement of our financial plan by understanding variances between actual
and planned adjusted operating income. We use this information to make decisions on how to manage
our consolidated insurance operations, including making decisions regarding expense budgets,
product prices and the purchase of tax-advantaged affordable housing limited partnerships.
Adjusted operating income is not a substitute for net income determined in accordance with
GAAP. The adjustments made to derive adjusted operating income are important to understanding our
overall results from operations and, if evaluated without proper context, adjusted operating income
possesses material limitations. As an example, we could produce a low level of net income in a
given period, despite strong operating performance, if in that period we generate significant net
realized losses from our investment portfolio. We could also produce a high level of net income in
a given period, despite poor operating performance, if in that period we generate significant net
realized gains from our investment portfolio. As an example of another limitation of adjusted
operating income, it does not include the decrease in cash flows expected to be collected as a
result of credit loss OTTI. Further, it includes changes to net investment income as a result of
OTTI, which are not directly related to our insurance operations, and does not adjust for any
negative impact to cash flows that we may experience in future periods as a result of such changes
in net investment income. Therefore, our management and board of directors also separately review
net realized investment gains (losses) and analyses of our net investment income, including impacts
related to OTTI write-downs, in connection with their review of our investment portfolio. In
addition, our management and board of directors examine net income as part of their review of our
overall financial results. For a reconciliation of adjusted operating income to net income, see
Results of Operations below.
28
Table of Contents
Adjusted Book Value, Adjusted Book Value per Common Share and Adjusted Book Value per Common Share, as Converted
Adjusted book value
Adjusted book value is a non-GAAP financial measure of our financial condition. Adjusted book
value consists of stockholders equity, less accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), or
AOCI.
Stockholders equity is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to adjusted book value.
AOCI, which is primarily composed of the net unrealized gains (losses) on our fixed maturities, net
of taxes, is a component of stockholders equity.
We purchase fixed maturities with durations and cash flows that match our estimate of when our
insurance liabilities and other obligations will come due. We typically expect to hold our fixed
maturities to maturity, using the principal and interest cash flows to pay our obligations over
time. Since we expect to collect the contractual cash flows on these fixed maturities, we do not
expect to realize the unrealized gains (losses) that are included in our AOCI balance as of any
particular date. AOCI primarily fluctuates based on changes in the fair value of our fixed
maturities, which is driven by factors outside of our control, including the impact of credit
market conditions and the movement of interest rates and credit spreads. These fluctuations do not
reflect any change in the cash flows we expect to receive. As an example, an increase in the fair
value of our fixed maturities improved AOCI by $209.2, or 421%, from a $49.7 loss as of December
31, 2009 to a $159.5 gain as of March 31, 2010, due to credit market improvements and tightening of
interest spreads. This contributed to a related increase in stockholders equity over the same
period of $538.4, or 38%; however, this increase did not impact our estimates regarding collection
of cash flows on the underlying fixed maturities.
We believe investors find it useful if we present them with a financial measure that removes
from stockholders equity these temporary and unrealized changes in the fair values of our
investments, and the related effects on AOCI. By evaluating our adjusted book value, an investor
can assess our financial condition based on our general practice of holding our fixed investments
to maturity. For example, we believe it is important that an investor not assume that an increase
in stockholders equity driven by unrealized gains means our company has grown in value and
alternatively, it is important that an investor not assume that a decrease in stockholders equity
driven by unrealized losses means our companys value has decreased.
In addition to using adjusted book value to evaluate our financial condition, our management
and board of directors have other uses for this measure, including reviewing debt levels as a
percentage of adjusted book value to monitor compliance with revolving credit facility covenants
and helping to maintain and improve our ratings from rating agencies. Our management also compares
adjusted book value to regulatory capital to assess our ability to maintain regulatory capital
ratios and ratings. Finally, our board of directors uses adjusted book value as a basis to measure
the success of our company over historical periods and reviews managements financial plans with
consideration to adjusted book value.
Adjusted book value is not a substitute for stockholders equity determined in accordance with
GAAP and considering adjusted book value on its own would present material limitations to an
analysis of our financial condition. For example, AOCI may deteriorate due to higher interest
rates, credit spreads and issues specific to particular investments. By not considering the size of
gross unrealized losses within AOCI, an investor may fail to appreciate the size of potential
losses or the amount of potential gains based on the fair value of our fixed maturities. As a
result, when evaluating our financial condition, we compensate for these limitations by also
considering stockholders equity and the unrealized gains (losses) on invested assets, which are
provided in our investment disclosures (see Investments for further information).
Adjusted book value should not be considered a substitute for stockholders equity. For a
reconciliation of adjusted book value to stockholders equity, see above.
Adjusted book value per common share
Adjusted book value per common share is a non-GAAP financial measure of our financial
condition. Adjusted book value per common share is calculated as adjusted book value, divided by
outstanding common shares. This measure does not include the 19.0 shares subject to outstanding
warrants for all periods presented because the warrant holders only participate in dividends and
would not be entitled to proceeds in the event of a liquidation or winding down of our company
should such event precede the exercise of the outstanding warrants.
29
Table of Contents
Book value per common share is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to adjusted book
value per common share. Book value per common share is calculated as stockholders equity divided
by the sum of our common shares outstanding and shares issuable pursuant to outstanding warrants.
We believe investors find it useful if we present them with adjusted book value (discussed
above), a financial measure that removes AOCI from stockholders equity, and then translate it into
another measure, adjusted book value per common share, that allows the investor to understand the
value of its investment on the adjusted book value basis. By evaluating this measure, an investor
will be able to assess its proportionate stake in our adjusted book value as of the dates
presented, and the change in such measure over time, based on our practice of holding our fixed
maturities to maturity. In addition, this measure allows an investor to understand the value of its
investment based on current shares outstanding because it represents our future share count in the
event that the outstanding warrants are not exercised before they expire.
In addition to using adjusted book value to evaluate our financial condition on a per common
share basis, our management and board of directors use this measure to assess the cost of obtaining
new equity capital and to compare the value and the change in value over time of our common shares
to that of our peer companies. For example, our board of directors takes into account the expected
market price of our common shares relative to adjusted book value per common share when considering
raising new equity capital.
Adjusted book value per common share is not a substitute for book value per common share
determined in accordance with GAAP and only considering adjusted book value per common share on its
own would present material limitations similar to those discussed above with respect to adjusted
book value.
Adjusted book value per common share should not be considered a substitute for book value per
common share. For a reconciliation of adjusted book value per common share to book value per common
share, see above.
Adjusted book value per common share, as converted
Adjusted book value per common share, as converted, is a non-GAAP financial measure of our
financial condition and gives effect to the exercise of our outstanding warrants. Adjusted book
value per common share, as converted, is calculated as adjusted book value plus the assumed
proceeds from the warrants, divided by the sum of outstanding common shares and shares subject to
outstanding warrants. Our shares issuable pursuant to outstanding warrants were 19.0 for all
periods presented.
Book value per common share is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to adjusted book
value per share, as converted. Book value per common share is calculated as stockholders equity
divided by the sum of our common shares outstanding and shares issuable pursuant to our outstanding
warrants.
We believe investors find it useful if we present them with adjusted book value (discussed
above), a financial measure that removes AOCI from stockholders equity and then translate it into
another measure, adjusted book value per common share, as converted, which gives effect to the
exercise of our outstanding warrants. By evaluating this measure, an investor will be able to
assess its proportionate stake in our adjusted book value for the periods presented, on a fully
diluted basis. We believe it is most meaningful for investors to compare this measure to adjusted
book value per common share as this will allow the investor to understand the dilutive effect if
the warrant holders exercise our outstanding warrants.
As discussed above, our management and board of directors use adjusted book value per common
share to compare the value of a share of our common stock to that of our peer companies, and also
to measure the cost of new equity capital. To further this analysis, our management and board of
directors also make these comparisons and judgments after taking into account the potential
dilutive effect of the exercise of our outstanding warrants.
Adjusted book value per common share, as converted, is not a substitute for book value per
common share determined in accordance with GAAP and only considering adjusted book value per common
share, as converted, on its own would present material limitations similar to those discussed above
with respect to adjusted book value.
Adjusted book value per common share, as converted, should not be considered a substitute for
book value per common share. For a reconciliation of adjusted book value per common share, as
converted, to book value per common share, see above.
30
Table of Contents
Operating ROAE
Operating return on average equity, or operating ROAE, is a non-GAAP measure of our
performance. Operating ROAE consists of adjusted operating income for the most recent four
quarters, divided by average adjusted book value, both of which are non-GAAP measures as described
above. We measure average adjusted book value by averaging adjusted book value for the most recent
five quarters.
Return on stockholders equity, or ROE, is the most directly comparable GAAP measure. Return
on stockholders equity is calculated as net income for the most recent four quarters, for such
period divided by the average stockholders equity for the most recent five quarters.
As discussed above under Adjusted operating income, we believe investors find it useful
to review the results of our insurance operations separate from the gain and loss activity
attributable to most of our investment portfolio because it highlights trends in the performance of
our insurance operations. In addition, as discussed above under Adjusted Book Value, Adjusted
Book Value per Common Share and Adjusted Book Value per Common Share, as Converted, we believe
investors find it useful if we present them with a financial measure that removes from
stockholders equity the temporary and unrealized changes in the fair values of our investments,
and the related effects on AOCI, because we do not expect to realize the unrealized gains (losses)
that are included in our AOCI balance as of any particular date. By referring to operating ROAE, an
investor can form a judgment as to how effectively our management uses funds invested by our
stockholders to generate adjusted operating income growth. Thus, we present operating ROAE for a
period to measure the rate of return produced by our adjusted operating income in such period based
on our average adjusted book value for such period.
In addition to using operating ROAE to evaluate how effectively our management uses funds
invested in our company, our management and board of directors have additional uses for operating
ROAE. These include comparing our operating ROAE to those of our peer companies, comparing our
operating ROAE against our target return objectives, and determining if our insurance and annuity
products are priced to achieve our long-term targets.
However, because operating ROAE excludes realized and unrealized gains (losses) on our
investment portfolio, it has material limitations as a financial measure of performance and should
not be considered on its own. As an example, we could produce a high operating ROAE in a given
period, despite poor net income, if in that period we generated significant net realized losses
from our investment portfolio. To compensate for such limitations, we also consider ROE to assess
financial performance and return on total equity.
Operating ROAE should not be considered a substitute for ROE. The numerator and denominator of
operating ROAE have been reconciled to net income and stockholders equity, respectively, their
most comparable GAAP financial measures, see above.
31
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Total Company
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited interim consolidated
financial statements and the related condensed notes. Set forth below is a summary of our
consolidated financial results. The variances noted in the total company and segment tables should
be interpreted as increases or (decreases), respectively.
Three Months | ||||||||||||
Ended March 31, | Variance (%) | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 vs. 2009 | ||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||
Premiums |
$ | 119.0 | $ | 119.5 | (0.4 | )% | ||||||
Net investment income |
286.9 | 262.7 | 9.2 | |||||||||
Policy fees, contract charges, and other |
40.5 | 39.6 | 2.3 | |||||||||
Net realized investment gains (losses): |
||||||||||||
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities |
(17.9 | ) | (51.6 | ) | * | |||||||
Less: portion of losses recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) |
8.2 | 23.8 | * | |||||||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
(9.7 | ) | (27.8 | ) | 65.1 | |||||||
Other net realized investment gains (losses) |
16.5 | (15.2 | ) | * | ||||||||
Total net realized investment gains (losses) |
6.8 | (43.0 | ) | * | ||||||||
Total revenues |
453.2 | 378.8 | 19.6 | |||||||||
Benefits and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Policyholder benefits and claims |
86.2 | 94.4 | (8.7 | ) | ||||||||
Interest credited |
218.5 | 195.6 | 11.7 | |||||||||
Other underwriting and operating expenses |
59.6 | 63.0 | (5.4 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense |
8.0 | 7.9 | 1.3 | |||||||||
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
15.4 | 10.7 | 43.9 | |||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
387.7 | 371.6 | 4.3 | |||||||||
Income from operations before income taxes |
65.5 | 7.2 | * | |||||||||
Provision for income taxes: |
||||||||||||
Current |
9.9 | 1.9 | * | |||||||||
Deferred |
9.3 | 0.2 | * | |||||||||
Total provision for income taxes: |
19.2 | 2.1 | * | |||||||||
Net income |
$ | 46.3 | $ | 5.1 | * | |||||||
Net income per common share(1): |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.05 | * | |||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.05 | * | |||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
131.018 | 111.622 | * | |||||||||
Diluted |
131.038 | 111.622 | * | |||||||||
Non-GAAP Financial Measures(2): |
||||||||||||
Adjusted operating income |
$ | 41.9 | $ | 32.2 | 30.1 | % | ||||||
Reconciliation to net income: |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 46.3 | $ | 5.1 | * | |||||||
Less: Net realized investment gains (losses) (net of taxes of $2.3 and $(15.0)) |
4.5 | (28.0 | ) | * | ||||||||
Add: Net investment gains (losses) on FIA options (net of taxes of $0.0 and $(0.5)) |
0.1 | (0.9 | ) | * | ||||||||
Adjusted operating income |
$ | 41.9 | $ | 32.2 | 30.1 | % | ||||||
* | Represents percentage variances that are not meaningful or are explained through the discussion of other variances. | |
(1) | For further information on the calculation of basic and diluted net income per common share, see Note 3 to the accompanying unaudited interim financial statements. | |
(2) | For a definition and discussion of the uses and limitations of this non-GAAP measure and other metrics used in our analysis, see Use of non-GAAP Financial Measures above. |
32
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
Summary of Results
Net income increased $41.2 on an increase in adjusted operating income and net realized
investment gains in the current year versus losses in the prior year period. Adjusted operating
income increased $9.7, which was primarily driven by an increase in the investment margin in our
Retirement Services segment, an increase in our universal life (UL) gross margin in our Individual
segment, and a reduction in other underwriting and operating expenses. These favorable drivers were
partially offset by a decrease in mortality gains, a decrease in the investment margin in our
Income Annuities segment, and a decrease in our BOLI gross margin in our Individual segment.
Net realized investment gains (losses) increased $49.8 to a gain of $6.8, for the three months
ended March 31, 2010. This was due to improved performance of our equity portfolio, which yielded
total returns of 5.4%, as compared to losses of (8.5)% in the first quarter of 2009, and a
reduction in impairment charges. For further discussion of our investment results and portfolio,
including a discussion of our impairment charges, refer to Investments below.
The provision for income taxes increased $17.1 primarily due to higher income from operations
before income taxes during the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the same period in
2009. Our effective tax rate, which was essentially flat, was 29.3% and 29.2%, for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Further discussion of adjusted operating income drivers described above:
Our Retirement Services segments investment margin increased $11.9 as a result of a $1.4
billion increase in our fixed annuity account values and an increase in the interest spread of 23
basis points (bp). Strong sales of fixed deferred annuity products over the past two years drove
the increased account values as we continued to capitalize on our broad distribution network to
satisfy a higher demand for fixed retirement savings products. Our interest spread increased mainly
due to more effective investment of cash in first quarter 2010 compared to first quarter of 2009
when the credit markets were extremely tight.
Our Income Annuities segment was negatively impacted by mortality losses of $0.1 in the
current quarter compared to gains of $4.3 in the first quarter of 2009. Mortality gains in the
first quarter of 2009 were unusually high while current quarter losses are below average historic
levels. In addition, the investment margin decreased $2.4 due to lower yields on invested assets,
which was the result of changes in prepayment speeds on mortgage-backed securities, lower
reinvestment rates, and reduced investment income related to corporate bond defaults.
Our Individual segments UL products gross margin increased $6.5 driven by the release of
bonus interest reserves and decreased amortization of deferred acquisition costs as the credited
interest rate on one of our universal life products is being adjusted downward to the guaranteed
minimum over the next year. This was partially offset by a decrease in the BOLI gross margin of
$1.6 due to a reduced spread as a result of increased claims and lower investment yields.
Segment Operating Results
The results of operations and selected operating metrics for our five segments (Group,
Retirement Services, Income Annuities, Individual and Other) for the three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009 are set forth in the following respective sections.
33
Table of Contents
Group
The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Group segment:
Three Months | ||||||||||||
Ended March 31, | Variance (%) | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 vs. 2009 | ||||||||||
Operating revenues: |
||||||||||||
Premiums |
$ | 108.8 | $ | 109.7 | (0.8 | )% | ||||||
Net investment income |
4.6 | 4.5 | 2.2 | |||||||||
Policy fees, contract charges, and other |
2.9 | 4.1 | (29.3 | ) | ||||||||
Total operating revenues |
116.3 | 118.3 | (1.7 | ) | ||||||||
Benefits and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Policyholder benefits and claims |
75.0 | 76.9 | (2.5 | ) | ||||||||
Other underwriting and operating expenses |
23.7 | 27.9 | (15.1 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
1.9 | 2.0 | (5.0 | ) | ||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
100.6 | 106.8 | (5.8 | ) | ||||||||
Segment pre-tax adjusted operating income |
$ | 15.7 | $ | 11.5 | 36.5 | % | ||||||
The following table sets forth selected historical operating metrics relating to our Group
segment as of, or for the three months ended:
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Group loss ratio(1) |
68.9 | % | 70.1 | % | ||||
Expense ratio(2) |
23.1 | % | 24.6 | % | ||||
Combined ratio(3) |
92.0 | % | 94.7 | % | ||||
Medical stop-loss loss ratio(4) |
70.1 | % | 71.6 | % | ||||
Total sales(5) |
$ | 41.4 | $ | 36.8 |
(1) | Group loss ratio represents policyholder benefits and claims incurred divided by premiums earned. | |
(2) | Expense ratio is equal to other underwriting and operating expenses of our insurance operations and amortization of DAC divided by premiums earned. | |
(3) | Combined ratio is equal to the sum of the loss ratio and the expense ratio. | |
(4) | Medical stop-loss loss ratio represents medical stop-loss policyholder benefits and incurred claims divided by medical stop-loss premiums earned. | |
(5) | Total sales represents annualized first-year premiums. |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
Summary of Results
Segment pre-tax adjusted operating income increased $4.2 primarily due to an improved loss
ratio and a reduction in other underwriting and operating expenses. The improved loss ratio
increased pre-tax adjusted operating income $1.0. Premiums remained relatively flat as a result of
price increases on renewals, offset by higher lapses, and we experienced fewer and less severe
medical stop-loss claims. The reduction in other underwriting and operating expenses was driven by
lower commission-related expenses and a reduction in employee-related costs.
In addition to the drivers discussed above, we consider the following information regarding
operating revenues and benefits and expenses useful in understanding our results.
34
Table of Contents
Operating Revenues
Policy fees, contract charges, and other decreased $1.2 primarily due to a reduction in
revenue from our third party administrator, which was sold in the third quarter of 2009. This
reduction in revenue was fully offset by a corresponding reduction in operating expenses.
Benefits and Expenses
The $4.2 decrease in other underwriting and operating expenses is consistent with the decrease
in our expense ratio. Of this decrease, $1.0 is due to lower commissions from lower average
commission rates, as well as a smaller premium base; and $1.1 due to decreased distribution
expenses driven by lower incentive compensation expense and lower distribution employee headcounts.
In addition, $1.7 of the decrease was attributable to a reduction in expenses as a result of the
sale of our third party administrator described above.
Retirement Services
The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Retirement Services
segment:
Three Months | ||||||||||||
Ended March 31, | Variance (%) | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 vs. 2009 | ||||||||||
Operating revenues: |
||||||||||||
Net investment income |
$ | 107.8 | $ | 83.0 | 29.9 | % | ||||||
Policy fees, contract charges, and other |
4.8 | 3.8 | 26.3 | |||||||||
Net investment gains (losses) on FIA options |
0.1 | (1.4 | ) | * | ||||||||
Total operating revenues |
112.7 | 85.4 | 32.0 | |||||||||
Benefits and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Policyholder benefits and claims |
0.1 | (0.5 | ) | * | ||||||||
Interest credited |
68.5 | 55.6 | 23.2 | |||||||||
Other underwriting and operating expenses |
13.6 | 13.5 | 0.7 | |||||||||
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
13.2 | 7.8 | 69.2 | |||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
95.4 | 76.4 | 24.9 | |||||||||
Segment pre-tax adjusted operating income |
$ | 17.3 | $ | 9.0 | 92.2 | % | ||||||
* | Represents percentage variances that are not meaningful or are explained through the discussion of other variances. |
The following table sets forth selected historical operating metrics relating to our
Retirement Services segment as of, or for the three months ended:
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Account values Fixed annuities |
$ | 8,005.4 | $ | 6,588.5 | ||||
Account values Variable annuities |
768.0 | 583.1 | ||||||
Interest spread on average account values(1) |
1.86 | % | 1.63 | % | ||||
Total sales(2) |
$ | 377.5 | $ | 911.1 |
(1) | Interest spread is the difference between net investment yield earned and the credited interest rate to policyholders. The investment yield is the approximate yield on invested assets in the general account attributed to the segment. The credited interest rate is the approximate rate credited on policyholder fixed account values within the segment. Interest credited is subject to contractual terms, including minimum guarantees. Interest spread tends to move gradually over time to reflect market interest rate movements and may reflect actions by management to respond to competitive pressures and profit targets. | |
2) | Total sales represent deposits for new policies. |
35
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
Summary of Results
Segment pre-tax adjusted operating income increased $8.3 driven by an increase of $11.9 in the
investment margin from a higher interest spread on record high account values driven by strong
sales in 2009 and 2010. This was partially offset by a $5.4 increase in DAC amortization.
In addition to the drivers discussed above, we consider the following information regarding
operating revenues and benefits and expenses useful in understanding our results.
Operating Revenues
Net investment income increased $24.8, which was driven by a $1.9 billion increase in average
invested assets (including cash). Further growth of net investment income was limited as fixed
deferred annuity sales during a tight credit market have resulted in us carrying higher levels of
cash, which earn lower yields.
Net investment gains (losses) on FIA options increased $1.5 with gains of $0.1 in the first
quarter of 2010 compared to losses of $1.4 for the same period in 2009. The S&P 500 index increased
4.9% in 2010, as compared to an 11.7% decrease in 2009.
Benefits and Expenses
Interest credited increased $12.9 primarily due to a 29% increase in average account value
driven by strong sales of fixed deferred annuity products in 2009 and 2010.
Amortization of DAC increased $5.4, which was primarily driven by a growing block of business
and corresponding growth in our DAC asset from strong sales.
Income Annuities
The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Income Annuities
segment:
Three Months | ||||||||||||
Ended March 31, | Variance (%) | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 vs. 2009 | ||||||||||
Operating revenues: |
||||||||||||
Net investment income |
$ | 104.0 | $ | 106.3 | (2.2 | )% | ||||||
Policy fees, contract charges, and other |
0.2 | 0.2 | * | |||||||||
Total operating revenues |
104.2 | 106.5 | (2.2 | ) | ||||||||
Benefits and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Interest credited |
92.0 | 86.7 | 6.1 | |||||||||
Other underwriting and operating expenses |
5.3 | 5.0 | 6.0 | |||||||||
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
0.5 | 0.4 | 25.0 | |||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
97.8 | 92.1 | 6.2 | |||||||||
Segment pre-tax adjusted operating income |
$ | 6.4 | $ | 14.4 | (55.6 | )% | ||||||
* | Represents percentage variances that are not meaningful or are explained through the discussion of other variances. |
36
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth selected historical operating metrics relating to our
Income Annuities segment as of, or for the three months ended:
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Reserves(1) |
$ | 6,726.7 | $ | 6,742.7 | ||||
Interest spread on reserves(2) |
0.41 | % | 0.59 | % | ||||
Mortality gains (losses)(3) |
$ | (0.1 | ) | $ | 4.3 | |||
Prepayment speed adjustment on mortgage-backed securities(4) |
(0.2 | ) | 0.7 | |||||
Total sales(5) |
66.3 | 40.4 |
(1) | Reserves represent the present value of future income annuity benefits and assumed expenses, discounted by the assumed interest rate. This metric represents the amount of our in-force book of business. | |
(2) | Interest spread is the difference between net investment yield earned and the credited interest rate on policyholder reserves. The investment yield is the approximate yield on invested assets, excluding equities, in the general account attributed to the segment. The credited interest rate is the approximate rate credited on policyholder reserves and excludes the gains and losses from funding services and mortality. | |
(3) | Mortality gains (losses) represent the difference between actual and expected reserves released on death of our life contingent annuities. | |
(4) | Prepayment speed adjustment on mortgage-backed securities is the impact to net investment income due to the change in prepayment speeds on the underlying collateral of mortgage-backed securities. | |
(5) | Sales represent deposits for new policies. |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
Summary of Results
Segment pre-tax adjusted operating income decreased $8.0 due to mortality losses of $0.1 in
the current quarter compared to gains of $4.3 in the first quarter of 2009, and a lower interest
spread driven by lower yields on our invested assets. In addition, we had a $1.2 decrease in gains
from funding services activities.
Reserves, representing our in-force book of business, have grown for the third consecutive
quarter. Income Annuity sales are up 64.1% over the first quarter of 2009, driven by an increase in
sales of structured settlements and SPIAs.
In addition to the drivers discussed above, we consider the following information regarding
operating revenues and benefits and expenses useful in understanding our results.
Operating Revenues
Net investment income decreased $2.3 primarily driven by a reduction in our return on invested
assets. Yields decreased to 5.95% from 6.10%, which was primarily due to higher corporate bond
defaults, lower reinvestment rates, and changes in prepayment speeds on the underlying collateral
of certain mortgage-backed fixed maturities.
Benefits and Expenses
Interest credited increased $5.3 primarily driven by a $4.4 fluctuation in our mortality
experience. We experienced mortality gains of $4.3 in the first quarter of 2009 versus mortality
losses of $0.1 in the first quarter of 2010. Mortality gains in the first quarter of 2009 were
unusually high, the highest we have experienced in a single quarter since becoming an independent
company, while current quarter mortality losses were below average historic levels.
37
Table of Contents
Individual
The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Individual segment:
Three Months | ||||||||||||
Ended March 31, | Variance (%) | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 vs. 2009 | ||||||||||
Operating revenues: |
||||||||||||
Premiums |
$ | 10.2 | $ | 9.8 | 4.1 | % | ||||||
Net investment income |
66.1 | 64.1 | 3.1 | |||||||||
Policy fees, contract charges, and other |
29.1 | 29.2 | (0.3 | ) | ||||||||
Total operating revenues |
105.4 | 103.1 | 2.2 | |||||||||
Benefits and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Policyholder benefits and claims |
11.1 | 18.0 | (38.3 | ) | ||||||||
Interest credited |
58.5 | 53.9 | 8.5 | |||||||||
Other underwriting and operating expenses |
12.7 | 13.5 | (5.9 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
(0.2 | ) | 0.5 | * | ||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
82.1 | 85.9 | (4.4 | ) | ||||||||
Segment pre-tax adjusted operating income |
$ | 23.3 | $ | 17.2 | 35.5 | % | ||||||
* | Represents percentage variances that are not meaningful or are explained through the discussion of other variances. |
The following table sets forth selected historical operating metrics relating to our
Individual segment as of, or for the three months ended:
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Insurance in force(1) |
$ | 50,056.5 | $ | 50,884.8 | ||||
Mortality ratio(2) |
83.2 | % | 82.3 | % | ||||
BOLI account value(3) |
$ | 3,853.2 | $ | 3,759.8 | ||||
UL account value(3) |
585.3 | 579.3 | ||||||
BOLI ROA(4) |
1.08 | % | 1.34 | % | ||||
UL interest spread(5) |
1.37 | % | 1.20 | % | ||||
Total sales, excluding BOLI(6) |
$ | 2.8 | $ | 2.5 | ||||
BOLI sales(7) |
2.7 | 2.5 |
(1) | Insurance in force represents dollar face amounts of policies. | |
(2) | Mortality ratio represents actual mortality experience as a percentage of industry mortality ratio benchmark. This benchmark is an expected level of claims that is derived by applying our current in force business to the Society of Actuaries 1990-95 Basic Select and Ultimate Mortality Table. | |
(3) | BOLI account value and UL account value represent our liability to our policyholders. | |
(4) | BOLI ROA is a measure of the gross margin on our BOLI book of business. This metric is calculated as the difference between our BOLI revenue earnings rate and our BOLI policy benefits rate. The revenue earnings rate is calculated as revenues divided by average invested assets. The policy benefits rate is calculated as total policy benefits divided by average account value. The policy benefits used in this metric do not include expenses. | |
(5) | UL interest spread is the difference between net investment yield earned and the credited interest rate to policyholders. The investment yield is the approximate yield on invested assets in the general account attributed to the UL policies. The credited interest rate is the approximate rate credited on UL policyholder fixed account values. Interest credited to UL policyholders account values is subject to contractual terms, including minimum guarantees. Interest credited tends to move gradually over time to reflect actions by management to respond to competitive pressures and profit targets. The 2010 first quarter credited rate to policyholders was adjusted to exclude a bonus interest reserve release. Without this adjustment the UL interest spread would have been 5.40%. | |
(6) | Total sales, excluding BOLI represents annualized first year premiums, and 10% of single premium new deposits. | |
(7) | BOLI sales represent 10% of new BOLI total deposits. |
38
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
Summary of Results
Segment pre-tax adjusted operating income increased $6.1 due to a $6.5 increase in the gross
margin on our UL products, a $0.9 decrease in claims expense, and a decrease in DAC amortization.
The increase in the UL gross margin is related to a credited rate reduction, discussed in further
detail below. These favorable drivers were partially offset by a $1.6 decrease in the BOLI gross
margin. Our BOLI ROA decreased due to decreased investment yields and increased claims. BOLI
related activity contributed to increases in net investment income, policyholder benefits and
claims and interest credited; the net impact was a reduction in our BOLI gross margin as the
increase in expenses exceeded the increase in income.
In addition to the drivers discussed above, we consider the following information regarding
operating revenues and benefits and expenses useful in understanding our results.
Benefits and Expenses
Due to the continued low interest rate environment, the credited interest rate on a universal
life product is being adjusted downward to the guaranteed minimum rate over the next year. For
these policies, bonus interest is not earned if the credited rate is equal to the guaranteed
minimum. As a result, pre-tax adjusted operating income increased $7.4, of which $6.0 was a release
of bonus interest reserves recorded in policyholder benefits and claims, and reflected in the $6.5
increase in UL gross margin; $1.7 was a reduction in DAC amortization due to the unlocking of
future assumptions; and $(0.3) was an adjustment to policy fees, contract charges and other.
Excluding the impact of the bonus interest reserve release, the UL gross margin increased $0.8 due
to a reduction in claims.
Other
The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Other segment:
Three Months | ||||||||||||
Ended March 31, | Variance (%) | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 vs. 2009 | ||||||||||
Operating revenues: |
||||||||||||
Net investment income |
$ | 4.4 | $ | 4.8 | (8.3 | )% | ||||||
Policy fees, contract charges, and other |
3.5 | 2.3 | 52.2 | |||||||||
Total operating revenues |
7.9 | 7.1 | 11.3 | |||||||||
Benefits and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Interest credited |
(0.5 | ) | (0.6 | ) | 16.7 | |||||||
Other underwriting and operating expenses |
4.3 | 3.1 | 38.7 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
8.0 | 7.9 | 1.3 | |||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
11.8 | 10.4 | 13.5 | |||||||||
Segment pre-tax adjusted operating loss |
$ | (3.9 | ) | $ | (3.3 | ) | (18.2 | )% | ||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
Summary of Results
Our Other segment reported pre-tax adjusted operating losses for the first quarters of 2010
and 2009 primarily due to interest expense on debt, which is not allocated to our operating
segments. In addition, net investment income decreased $0.4 due to a decrease in average invested
assets as we allocated more assets to our business segments to fund growth, primarily our
Retirement Services segment.
39
Table of Contents
Investments
Our investment portfolio is structured with the objective of supporting the expected cash
flows of our liabilities and to produce stable returns over the long term. The composition of our
portfolio reflects our asset management philosophy of protecting principal and receiving
appropriate reward for credit risk. Our investment portfolio mix as of March 31, 2010, consisted in
large part
of high quality fixed maturities and commercial mortgage loans, as well as a smaller
allocation of high yield fixed maturities, marketable equity securities, investments in limited
partnerships (which includes affordable housing, private equity and hedge funds) and other
investments. We believe that prudent levels of investments in marketable equity securities within
our investment portfolio offer enhanced long term, after-tax total returns to support a portion of
our longest duration liabilities.
The following table presents the composition of our investment portfolio:
As of March 31, | As of December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Types of Investments |
||||||||
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale: |
||||||||
Public |
$ | 18,476.5 | $ | 17,693.0 | ||||
Private |
914.1 | 901.3 | ||||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale(1) |
37.6 | 36.7 | ||||||
Marketable equity securities, trading(2) |
151.0 | 154.1 | ||||||
Mortgage loans, net |
1,228.0 | 1,201.7 | ||||||
Policy loans |
73.4 | 73.9 | ||||||
Short-term investments |
54.0 | 2.1 | ||||||
Investments in limited partnerships(3) |
||||||||
Private equity and hedge funds |
25.2 | 24.7 | ||||||
Affordable housing projects |
105.4 | 85.5 | ||||||
Other invested assets |
9.1 | 10.1 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 21,074.3 | $ | 20,183.1 | ||||
(1) | Amount primarily represents non-redeemable preferred stock. | |
(2) | Amount represents investments in common stock. | |
(3) | Investments in private equity and hedge funds are carried at fair value, while our investments in affordable housing projects and state tax credit refunds are carried at amortized cost. In 2009, we submitted liquidation notices to all of our hedge fund partnerships. As of March 31, 2010, our remaining investment in hedge fund partnerships was $4.0. |
The increase in invested assets during the first quarter of 2010 is primarily due to a
net increase in the fair value of our fixed maturities, and portfolio growth generated by sales of
fixed deferred annuities and net proceeds from our IPO. As of March 31, 2010, the fair value of our
fixed maturities increased $371.6 from a $40.6 net unrealized gain as of December 31, 2009 to a
$412.2 net unrealized gain as of March 31, 2010. During the first quarter of 2010, the credit and
equity markets continued to rebound, and the low interest rate environment and tight interest
spreads increased the fair value of our fixed maturities.
Investment Returns
Return on invested assets is an important element of our financial results. The following
table sets forth the income yield and investment income, excluding realized investment gains
(losses) for each major investment category:
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
March 31, 2010 | March 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Yield(1) | Amount | Yield(1) | Amount | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Types of Investments |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale |
5.76 | % | $ | 271.0 | 5.89 | % | $ | 250.8 | ||||||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
4.43 | 0.6 | 2.71 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, trading |
1.68 | 0.7 | 1.55 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage loans, net |
6.17 | 18.8 | 6.34 | 16.0 | ||||||||||||
Policy loans |
5.99 | 1.1 | 5.75 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||
Investments in limited partnerships: |
||||||||||||||||
Private equity and hedge funds |
11.70 | 0.9 | 4.95 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||
Affordable housing(2) |
(6.96 | ) | (2.1 | ) | (9.02 | ) | (2.3 | ) | ||||||||
Other income producing assets(3) |
0.89 | 1.1 | 0.17 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||
Gross investment income before investment expenses |
5.58 | 292.1 | 5.64 | 267.6 | ||||||||||||
Investment expenses |
(0.10 | ) | (5.2 | ) | (0.10 | ) | (4.9 | ) | ||||||||
Net investment income |
5.48 | % | $ | 286.9 | 5.54 | % | $ | 262.7 | ||||||||
40
Table of Contents
(1) | Yields are determined based on monthly averages calculated using beginning and end-of-period balances. Yields are based on carrying values except for fixed maturities and equity securities. Yields for fixed maturities are based on amortized cost. Yields for equity securities are based on cost. | |
(2) | The negative yield from affordable housing investments is offset by U.S. federal income tax benefits. The resulting impact to net income was $1.5 and $0.9 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. | |
(3) | Other income producing assets includes income from other invested assets, short-term investments and cash and cash equivalents. |
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, net investment income increased 9.2% driven by an
increase in invested assets on strong sales of our fixed deferred annuities in 2009 and 2010. This
was partially offset by a decrease in net investment yields, which decreased to 5.48% in 2010 from
5.54% in 2009. The reduction in yields was primarily driven by lower yields on purchases of fixed
maturities as well as a negative impact of $0.4 from defaulted securities.
In addition, the increase in our net investment income was limited as a result of us carrying
higher-levels of cash. Our higher cash balances were the result of cash from sales of our products
and our IPO proceeds during a tight credit market. We estimate that the impact of carrying this
higher level of cash limited our growth in net investment income by $3.5, or 7 bp on our yield, for
first quarter 2010.
The following table sets forth the detail of our net realized investment gains (losses) before
taxes. As the following table indicates, our net gains on trading securities significantly
increased for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. This was
the result of improved equity market conditions during the first quarter of 2010, resulting in
increases in the fair value of our trading portfolio. In addition, impairments decreased $18.1
period over period as the economy recovers.
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Gross realized gains on sales of fixed maturities |
10.4 | 0.5 | ||||||
Gross realized losses on sales of fixed maturities |
(1.1 | ) | (0.6 | ) | ||||
Impairments: |
||||||||
Public fixed maturities(1) |
(2.4 | ) | (17.7 | ) | ||||
Private fixed maturities |
(5.1 | ) | (0.9 | ) | ||||
Total credit-related |
(7.5 | ) | (18.6 | ) | ||||
Other |
(2.2 | ) | (9.2 | ) | ||||
Total impairments |
(9.7 | ) | (27.8 | ) | ||||
Net gains (losses) on trading securities |
7.6 | (15.3 | ) | |||||
Other net investment gains (losses)(2): |
||||||||
Other gross gains |
3.8 | 7.1 | ||||||
Other gross losses |
(4.2 | ) | (6.9 | ) | ||||
Net realized investment gains (losses) before taxes |
$ | 6.8 | $ | (43.0 | ) | |||
(1) | Public fixed maturities includes publicly traded securities and highly marketable private placements for which there is an actively traded market. | |
(2) | This primarily consists of changes in fair value on derivatives instruments, gains (losses) on calls and redemptions, and the impact of net realized investment gains (losses) on DAC and deferred sales inducements. |
We monitor our investments for indicators of possible credit-related impairments, with a
focus on securities that represent a significant risk of impairment, primarily securities for which
the fair value has declined below amortized cost by 20% or more for a period of six months or more,
or for which we have concerns about the creditworthiness of the issuer based on qualitative
information. When evaluating a security for possible impairment, we consider several factors, which
are described in more detail in Note 4 to the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements.
Impairments for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were $9.7, of which 77.3% were related
to credit concerns of the issuer and 22.7% were due to our intent to sell the security.
Credit-related impairments decreased by $11.1 for the three months ended
41
Table of Contents
March 31, 2010, compared to the same period last year, primarily as a result of decreased
credit concerns as the economy continues to recover from the financial crisis. The amount
recognized as credit-related impairments is determined by management as the difference between a
securitys estimated recovery value and the amortized cost of the security.
The following table summarizes our five largest aggregate losses from impairments and our
remaining holdings, if any, by each issuers industry for the three months ended March 31, 2010,
for non-structured and structured securities, which represented 82.5% and 16.5%, respectively, of
the total impairments during this period. Impairments on structured securities are presented
separately and on an individual security basis as the underlying collateral is not directly related
to the issuer.
Three Months Ended | As of March 31, 2010 | |||||||||||
March 31, 2010 | Cost or Amortized | Fair | ||||||||||
Industry | Impairment | Cost(1) | Value | |||||||||
Non-structured securities: |
||||||||||||
Industrial machinery (private) |
$ | (5.1 | ) | $ | 11.9 | $ | 11.9 | |||||
Electrical utilities (public) |
(2.1 | ) | 62.2 | 58.3 | ||||||||
Municipal taxable (public) |
(0.6 | ) | 2.2 | 1.9 | ||||||||
Other diversified financial services (public) |
(0.1 | ) | 0.2 | 0.2 | ||||||||
Building products (public) |
(0.1 | ) | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||||
Total for non-structured securities |
$ | (8.0 | ) | $ | 76.6 | $ | 72.4 | |||||
Structured securities: |
||||||||||||
RMBS Consumer finance (public) |
$ | (0.4 | ) | $ | 14.8 | $ | 11.7 | |||||
RMBS Consumer finance (public) |
(0.4 | ) | 14.3 | 12.0 | ||||||||
RMBS Consumer finance (public) |
(0.3 | ) | 2.5 | 2.7 | ||||||||
RMBS Consumer finance (public) |
(0.3 | ) | 2.7 | 2.8 | ||||||||
RMBS Consumer finance (public) |
(0.2 | ) | 11.7 | 9.0 | ||||||||
Total for structured securities |
$ | (1.6 | ) | $ | 46.0 | $ | 38.2 | |||||
(1) | As of March 31, 2010, the cost or amortized cost represents our estimated recovery value, based on our discounted cash flow analysis, or fair value, if we intend to sell the security. |
Impairments for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were $27.8, of which 66.9% were
related to credit concerns of the issuer and 33.1% were due to our intent to sell the security.
The following table summarizes our five largest aggregate losses from impairments and our
remaining holdings, if any, by each issuers industry for the three months ended March 31, 2009,
for non-structured and structured securities, which represented 56.8% and 7.6%, respectively, of
the total impairments during this period. Impairments on structured securities are presented
separately and on an individual security basis as the underlying collateral is not directly related
to the issuer. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, there were a total of three impaired
structured securities.
Three Months Ended | As of March 31, 2009 | |||||||||||
March 31, 2009 | Cost or Amortized | Fair | ||||||||||
Industry | Impairment | Cost(1) | Value | |||||||||
Non-structured securities: |
||||||||||||
Publishing (public) |
$ | (6.7 | ) | $ | 1.7 | $ | 1.6 | |||||
Specialty chemicals (public) |
(4.1 | ) | 4.5 | 3.8 | ||||||||
Specialized finance (public) |
(2.1 | ) | 4.9 | 4.9 | ||||||||
Commodity chemicals (public) |
(1.8 | ) | 9.5 | 2.4 | ||||||||
Diversified chemicals (public) |
(1.1 | ) | 0.3 | 0.2 | ||||||||
Total for non-structured securities |
$ | (15.8 | ) | $ | 20.9 | $ | 12.9 | |||||
Structured securities: |
||||||||||||
Asset management and customer banks (public) |
$ | (1.1 | ) | $ | 46.6 | $ | 43.1 | |||||
Consumer finance (public) |
(0.8 | ) | 15.4 | 9.2 | ||||||||
Specialized finance (public) |
(0.2 | ) | 21.8 | 18.5 | ||||||||
Total for structured securities |
$ | (2.1 | ) | $ | 83.8 | $ | 70.8 | |||||
(1) | As of March 31, 2009, the cost or amortized cost represents our estimated recovery value, based on our discounted cash flow analysis, or fair value, if we intend to sell the security. |
42
Table of Contents
Fixed Maturity Securities
Fixed maturities represented approximately 92% of invested assets as of both March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2010, publicly traded fixed maturities and privately placed
fixed maturities represented 95.3% and 4.7%, respectively, of our total fixed maturity portfolio at
fair value. We invest in privately placed fixed maturities to enhance the overall value of the
portfolio, increase diversification and obtain higher yields than can ordinarily be obtained with
comparable public market securities.
Fixed Maturity Securities Credit Quality
The Securities Valuation Office, or SVO, of the NAIC, evaluates the investments of insurers
for regulatory reporting purposes and assigns fixed maturities to one of the six categories called
NAIC Designations. NAIC designations of 1 or 2 include fixed maturities considered investment
grade, which generally include securities rated BBB- or higher by Standard & Poors. NAIC
designations of 3 through 6 are referred to as below investment grade, which generally include
securities rated BB+ or lower by Standard & Poors. As a result of time lags between the funding of
investments, the finalization of legal documents and the completion of the SVO filing process, the
fixed maturities portfolio generally includes securities that have not yet been rated by the SVO as
of each balance sheet date. Pending receipt of SVO ratings, the categorization of these securities
by NAIC designation is based on the expected ratings indicated by internal analysis. As of March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, 11 securities with an amortized cost of $83.1 and a fair value of
$87.1, and 14 securities with an amortized cost of $99.1 and a fair value of $101.9, respectively,
were categorized based on expected NAIC designations, pending receipt of SVO ratings.
The following table presents our fixed maturities by NAIC designation and S&P equivalent
credit ratings, as well as the percentage of total fixed maturities, based upon fair value that
each designation comprises:
As of March 31, 2010 | As of December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Fair | % of Total | Amortized | Fair | % of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
NAIC | S&P Equivalent | Cost | Value | Fair Value | Cost | Value | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||
1 | AAA, AA, A |
$ | 11,036.4 | $ | 11,350.3 | 58.5 | % | $ | 10,917.3 | $ | 11,031.3 | 59.3 | % | |||||||||||||||
2 | BBB |
6,772.7 | 6,960.2 | 35.9 | 6,471.3 | 6,530.9 | 35.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total investment grade |
17,809.1 | 18,310.5 | 94.4 | 17,388.6 | 17,562.2 | 94.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | BB |
738.8 | 688.4 | 3.6 | 717.9 | 641.3 | 3.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | B |
272.2 | 250.2 | 1.3 | 251.0 | 219.2 | 1.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 | CCC & lower |
128.4 | 122.7 | 0.6 | 128.0 | 113.5 | 0.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | In or near default |
29.9 | 18.8 | 0.1 | 68.2 | 58.1 | 0.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total below investment grade |
1,169.3 | 1,080.1 | 5.6 | 1,165.1 | 1,032.1 | 5.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 18,978.4 | $ | 19,390.6 | 100.0 | % | $ | 18,553.7 | $ | 18,594.3 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, securities with an amortized cost of $852.4 and
$898.2, and fair value of $896.3 and $925.8, respectively, had no rating from a nationally
recognized securities rating agency. We derived the equivalent S&P credit quality rating for these
securities based on the securities NAIC rating designation.
Below investment grade securities comprised 5.6% of our fixed maturities portfolio as of both
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Most of these securities were corporate securities and most
were purchased while classified as below investment grade, high yield investments.
For securities where we recorded a credit-related OTTI, the amortized cost as of March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009 in the table above represents managements estimated recovery value,
based on our best estimate of discounted cash flows for the security. As of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, we did not have the intent to sell these securities or consider it more likely
than not that we would be required to sell the securities prior to recovery of their amortized
cost. Furthermore, based upon our cash flow modeling and the expected continuation of contractually
required principal and interest payments, we considered these securities to be temporarily impaired
as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
We had securities with an NAIC 5 designation with a fair value of $122.7 as of March 31, 2010.
These securities had gross unrealized losses of $14.4, of which $12.4 were related to three
issuers. The issuers of these securities are current on their contractual payments and our
analyses, including cash flow analyses where appropriate, support the recoverability of amortized
cost.
43
Table of Contents
We had securities with an NAIC 6 designation with a total fair value of $18.8 as of March 31,
2010, with net unrealized losses of $11.1, comprised of gross unrealized losses of $13.4 and gross
unrealized gains of $2.3. Of these gross unrealized losses, $12.9, or 96.3%, was from a single
issuer. This issuer is current on its contractual payments and our analysis of the underlying
credit and managements best estimates of discounted future cash flows support the recoverability
of the amortized cost.
Certain of our fixed maturities are supported by guarantees from monoline bond insurers. As of
March 31, 2010, fixed maturities with monoline guarantees had an amortized cost of $596.4 and a
fair value of $566.9, with gross unrealized losses of $36.7. As of December 31, 2009, fixed
maturities with monoline guarantees had an amortized cost of $599.7 and a fair value of $559.8,
with gross unrealized losses of $45.2. The majority of these securities were municipal bonds.
The credit ratings of our fixed maturities set forth in the table above reflect, where
applicable, the guarantees provided by monoline bond insurers. As of March 31, 2010, $534.8, or
94.3%, of the fair value of fixed maturities supported by guarantees from monoline bond insurers
had investment grade credit ratings. Excluding the effect of the monoline insurance, $532.9, or
94.0%, of the fair value of fixed maturities had investment grade credit ratings.
Fixed Maturity Securities and Unrealized Gains and Losses by Security Sector
The following table sets forth the fair value of our fixed maturities by sector, as well as
the associated gross unrealized gains and losses and the percentage of total fixed maturities that
each sector comprises as of the dates indicated:
As of March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other-than- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost or | Gross | Gross | % of | Temporary | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | Total Fair | Impairments | |||||||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | Value | in AOCI | |||||||||||||||||||
Security Sector |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate Securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer discretionary |
$ | 1,137.8 | $ | 52.9 | $ | (18.7 | ) | $ | 1,172.0 | 6.0 | % | $ | (2.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Consumer staples |
1,762.9 | 106.8 | (13.8 | ) | 1,855.9 | 9.6 | (1.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Energy |
647.9 | 32.5 | (6.3 | ) | 674.1 | 3.5 | | |||||||||||||||||
Financials |
2,103.6 | 50.5 | (120.1 | ) | 2,034.0 | 10.5 | (5.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Health care |
908.5 | 66.8 | (2.8 | ) | 972.5 | 5.0 | (1.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Industrials |
2,257.6 | 114.0 | (14.4 | ) | 2,357.2 | 12.2 | (0.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Information technology |
381.7 | 30.1 | (0.5 | ) | 411.3 | 2.1 | | |||||||||||||||||
Materials |
1,190.6 | 50.5 | (34.4 | ) | 1,206.7 | 6.2 | (12.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Telecommunication services |
586.2 | 23.3 | (15.1 | ) | 594.4 | 3.1 | (1.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Utilities |
1,878.3 | 69.8 | (36.3 | ) | 1,911.8 | 9.9 | (0.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
8.3 | 0.6 | | 8.9 | 0.0 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total corporate securities |
12,863.4 | 597.8 | (262.4 | ) | 13,198.8 | 68.1 | (26.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agencies |
41.6 | 2.5 | | 44.1 | 0.2 | (0.1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
516.5 | 3.5 | (30.1 | ) | 489.9 | 2.5 | (0.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign governments |
25.3 | 0.9 | | 26.2 | 0.1 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agency |
3,052.1 | 115.9 | (2.7 | ) | 3,165.3 | 16.3 | | |||||||||||||||||
Non-agency: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime |
418.2 | 2.8 | (59.3 | ) | 361.7 | 1.9 | (36.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Alt-A |
137.5 | 1.7 | (16.9 | ) | 122.3 | 0.6 | (8.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total residential mortgage-backed securities |
3,607.8 | 120.4 | (78.9 | ) | 3,649.3 | 18.8 | (44.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
1,711.9 | 79.0 | (16.1 | ) | 1,774.8 | 9.2 | (3.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other debt obligations |
211.9 | 12.4 | (16.8 | ) | 207.5 | 1.1 | (3.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 18,978.4 | $ | 816.5 | $ | (404.3 | ) | $ | 19,390.6 | 100.0 | % | $ | (79.2 | ) | ||||||||||
During the three months ended March 31, 2010 we increased our investments in corporate
securities with cash generated from sales, primarily fixed deferred annuities, and the proceeds
from our IPO. We have purchased new issues of investment grade corporate securities with a focus on
obtaining appropriate yields to match our policyholder liabilities while retaining quality.
44
Table of Contents
Our fixed maturities holdings are diversified by industry and issuer. The portfolio does
not have significant exposure to any single issuer. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 the
fair value of our ten largest holdings of corporate securities was $1,211.1 and $1,138.3, or
approximately 9.2% and 9.1%, respectively. The fair value of our largest exposure to a single
issuer of corporate securities was $148.7, or 1.1%, and $141.9, or 1.1%, of our investments in
corporate securities, as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
As of March 31, 2010, we had no direct exposure to the sovereign and local government debt of Portugal, Ireland, Italy,
Greece, and Spain.
As of December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other-than- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost or | Gross | Gross | % of | Temporary | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | Total Fair | Impairments | |||||||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | Value | in AOCI | |||||||||||||||||||
Security Sector |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate Securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer discretionary |
$ | 1,093.3 | $ | 41.9 | $ | (29.6 | ) | $ | 1,105.6 | 5.9 | % | $ | (7.9 | ) | ||||||||||
Consumer staples |
1,736.6 | 84.7 | (17.6 | ) | 1,803.7 | 9.7 | (1.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Energy |
651.4 | 28.3 | (8.8 | ) | 670.9 | 3.6 | | |||||||||||||||||
Financials |
2,122.9 | 39.8 | (193.2 | ) | 1,969.5 | 10.6 | (5.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Health care |
861.1 | 59.1 | (4.1 | ) | 916.1 | 4.9 | (1.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Industrials |
2,091.7 | 92.6 | (28.1 | ) | 2,156.2 | 11.6 | (1.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Information technology |
357.2 | 27.9 | (0.3 | ) | 384.8 | 2.1 | | |||||||||||||||||
Materials |
1,111.7 | 39.1 | (49.0 | ) | 1,101.8 | 5.9 | (12.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Telecommunication services |
583.4 | 21.3 | (16.7 | ) | 588.0 | 3.2 | (1.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Utilities |
1,837.5 | 52.4 | (46.3 | ) | 1,843.6 | 9.9 | (0.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
8.0 | 0.4 | | 8.4 | 0.1 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total corporate securities |
12,454.8 | 487.5 | (393.7 | ) | 12,548.6 | 67.5 | (32.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agencies |
41.6 | 2.4 | (0.1 | ) | 43.9 | 0.2 | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
518.4 | 1.9 | (37.3 | ) | 483.0 | 2.6 | (1.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign governments |
26.7 | 0.8 | (0.1 | ) | 27.4 | 0.1 | | |||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agency |
2,936.8 | 102.6 | (6.7 | ) | 3,032.7 | 16.3 | | |||||||||||||||||
Non-agency: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime |
449.8 | 0.6 | (72.4 | ) | 378.0 | 2.0 | (31.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Alt-A |
145.3 | 2.1 | (21.9 | ) | 125.5 | 0.7 | (8.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Subprime |
0.2 | | | 0.2 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total residential mortgage-backed securities |
3,532.1 | 105.3 | (101.0 | ) | 3,536.4 | 19.0 | (39.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
1,805.6 | 44.5 | (60.7 | ) | 1,789.4 | 9.7 | (4.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other debt obligations |
174.5 | 8.6 | (17.5 | ) | 165.6 | 0.9 | (3.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 18,553.7 | $ | 651.0 | $ | (610.4 | ) | $ | 18,594.3 | 100.0 | % | $ | (81.9 | ) | ||||||||||
Fixed Maturity Securities by Contractual Maturity Date
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, approximately 28% and 29% of the fair value of our
fixed maturity portfolio was held in mortgaged-backed securities, and 26% and 27% of our portfolio
was due after ten years, which we consider to be longer duration assets. Fixed maturities in these
categories primarily back long duration reserves in our Income Annuities segment, which can exceed
a period of 30 years. As of both March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, approximately 82% of the
gross unrealized losses on our investment portfolio related to these longer duration assets, which
are more sensitive to interest rate fluctuations and credit spreads. For more information, see Note
4 to the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (RMBS)
We classify our investments in RMBS as agency, prime, Alt-A, and subprime. Agency RMBS are
guaranteed or otherwise supported by the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home
Loan Mortgage Corporation or the Government National Mortgage Association. Prime RMBS are loans to
the most credit-worthy customers with high quality credit profiles.
45
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the fair value of the Companys investment in agency, prime,
Alt-A and subprime RMBS and the percentage of total invested assets they represent:
As of March 31, 2010 | As of December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
% of Total | % of Total | |||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Invested Assets | Fair Value | Invested Assets | |||||||||||||
Agency |
$ | 3,165.3 | 15.0 | % | $ | 3,032.7 | 15.0 | % | ||||||||
Non-agency: |
||||||||||||||||
Prime |
361.7 | 1.7 | 378.0 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||
Alt-A |
122.3 | 0.6 | 125.5 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
Subprime |
| | 0.2 | | ||||||||||||
Subtotal non-agency |
484.0 | 2.3 | 503.7 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 3,649.3 | 17.3 | % | $ | 3,536.4 | 17.5 | % | ||||||||
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, agency, which were all rated AAA, represented 87%
and 86%, respectively, of our RMBS holdings. Of our non-agency RMBS, 75% were classified as prime
as of both March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Our remaining non-agency RMBS securities were
classified as Alt-A because we viewed each security to have overall collateral credit quality
between prime and subprime, based on a review of the characteristics of their underlying mortgage
loan pools, such as credit scores and financial ratios.
During first quarter 2010, agency RMBS issuers announced purchase programs to acquire
delinquent loans. These programs may result in changes in the underlying prepayment speeds of the
assets, and presenting reinvestment challenges given the low interest rate environment. We do not
foresee this having a material effect on our net investment income or cash flows.
The following table sets forth the amortized cost of our non-agency RMBS by credit quality and
year of origination (vintage). There were eight securities with a total amortized cost of $52.1
that were rated below investment grade by either Moodys, S&P or Fitch, while the others rated them
investment grade.
As of March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Highest Rating Agency Rating | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Total as of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BB and | Amortized | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vintage | AAA | AA | A | BBB | Below | Cost | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 74.7 | $ | 74.7 | $ | 91.0 | ||||||||||||||
2006 |
0.2 | 3.0 | 16.5 | 27.3 | 118.0 | 165.0 | 177.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
2.6 | 9.1 | 31.7 | 38.8 | 28.3 | 110.5 | 113.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2004 & prior |
190.1 | 14.7 | | | 0.7 | 205.5 | 213.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 192.9 | $ | 26.8 | $ | 48.2 | $ | 66.1 | $ | 221.7 | $ | 555.7 | $ | 595.3 | ||||||||||||||
% of amortized cost |
34.7 | % | 4.8 | % | 8.7 | % | 11.9 | % | 39.9 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
The following table sets forth the fair value of our non-agency RMBS by credit quality and
year of origination (vintage):
As of March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Highest Rating Agency Rating | Total as of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BB and | Total Fair | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vintage | AAA | AA | A | BBB | Below | Value | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 69.0 | $ | 69.0 | $ | 83.3 | ||||||||||||||
2006 |
0.2 | 2.9 | 16.6 | 24.4 | 98.6 | 142.7 | 143.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
2.5 | 4.8 | 26.3 | 30.0 | 21.7 | 85.3 | 86.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2004 & prior |
174.7 | 11.6 | | | 0.7 | 187.0 | 191.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 177.4 | $ | 19.3 | $ | 42.9 | $ | 54.4 | $ | 190.0 | $ | 484.0 | $ | 503.7 | ||||||||||||||
% of fair value |
36.6 | % | 4.0 | % | 8.9 | % | 11.2 | % | 39.3 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
On a fair value basis as of March 31, 2010, our Alt-A portfolio was 86.7% fixed rate
collateral and 13.3% hybrid adjustable rate mortgages, or ARM, with no exposure to option ARM
mortgages. Generally, fixed rate mortgages have performed better with lower delinquencies and
defaults on the underlying collateral than both option ARMs and hybrid ARMs in the current economic
environment. Of the total Alt-A portfolio, $56.4, or 46.1%, had an S&P equivalent credit rating of
AAA, as of March 31, 2010.
46
Table of Contents
As of March 31, 2010, our Alt-A, prime and total non-agency RMBS had an estimated
weighted-average credit enhancement of 14.2%, 8.4% and 9.8%, respectively. Credit enhancement
refers to the weighted-average percentage of the outstanding capital structure that is subordinate
in the priority of cash flows and absorbs losses first. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
60.8% and 59.6%, respectively, of the fair value of our RMBS had super senior subordination. The
super senior class has priority over all principal and interest cash flows and will not experience
any loss of principal until lower levels are written down to zero. Therefore, the majority of our
RMBS investments have less exposure to defaults and delinquencies in the underlying collateral than
if we held the more subordinated classes.
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (CMBS)
The following table sets forth the fair value of our investment in CMBS and the percentage of
total invested assets they represent:
As of March 31, 2010 | As of December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
% of Total | % of Total | |||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Invested Assets | Fair Value | Invested Assets | |||||||||||||
Agency |
$ | 450.6 | 2.1 | % | $ | 425.6 | 2.1 | % | ||||||||
Non-agency |
1,324.2 | 6.3 | 1,363.8 | 6.8 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,774.8 | 8.4 | % | $ | 1,789.4 | 8.9 | % | ||||||||
There have been disruptions in the CMBS market that continued in the first quarter 2010 due to
weakness in commercial real estate market fundamentals, and previously reduced underwriting
standards by some originators of commercial mortgage loans within the more recent vintage years
(2006 through 2008). This has reduced market liquidity and availability of capital, increased market
belief that default rates will increase, and increased spreads and the repricing of risk. However,
as discussed below, the quality of our CMBS portfolio, which is predominately in the most senior
tranche of the structure type, has a weighted-average estimated credit enhancement of 28.9% on the
entire portfolio, which is significant in a deep commercial real estate downturn during which
expected losses may increase substantially. As of March 31, 2010, on an amortized cost basis, 98.2%
of our entire CMBS portfolio were rated AAA, 0.4% were rated AA or A, and 1.4% were rated B and
below.
The following table sets forth the amortized cost of our non-agency CMBS by credit quality and
year of origination (vintage). There were twelve securities having a fair value of $285.8 and an
amortized cost of $288.1 that were rated A by S&P, while Moodys and/or Fitch rated them AAA.
As of March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Highest Rating Agency Rating | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | As of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BB and | Amortized | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vintage | AAA | AA | A | BBB | Below | Cost | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2008 |
$ | 66.1 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 66.1 | $ | 66.0 | ||||||||||||||
2007 |
452.1 | | | | 1.3 | 453.4 | 471.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
136.0 | | | | 12.3 | 148.3 | 148.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
300.8 | | | | | 300.8 | 311.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2004 & prior |
286.8 | 0.5 | 6.0 | | 11.2 | 304.5 | 391.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,241.8 | $ | 0.5 | $ | 6.0 | $ | | $ | 24.8 | $ | 1,273.1 | $ | 1,388.3 | ||||||||||||||
The following table set forth the fair value of our non-agency CMBS by credit quality and year
of origination (vintage):
As of March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Highest Rating Agency Rating | As of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BB and | Total Fair | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vintage | AAA | AA | A | BBB | Below | Value | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2008 |
$ | 64.8 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 64.8 | $ | 59.0 | ||||||||||||||
2007 |
474.9 | | | | 1.4 | 476.3 | 458.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
144.9 | | | | 9.8 | 154.7 | 144.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
318.7 | | | | | 318.7 | 311.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2004 & prior |
295.5 | 0.5 | 5.5 | | 8.2 | 309.7 | 389.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,298.8 | $ | 0.5 | $ | 5.5 | $ | | $ | 19.4 | $ | 1,324.2 | $ | 1,363.8 | ||||||||||||||
U.S. CMBS securities have historically utilized a senior/subordinate credit structure to
allocate cash flows and losses, which includes super-senior, mezzanine and junior AAA tranches. The
credit enhancement on the most senior tranche (super-senior) is 30%.
47
Table of Contents
The mezzanine AAAs typically have 20% credit enhancement and the junior AAAs generally have 14%
credit enhancement. Credit enhancement refers to the weighted-average percentage of outstanding
capital structure that is subordinate in the priority of cash flows and absorbs losses first.
Credit enhancement does not include any equity interest or principal in excess of outstanding debt.
The super senior class has priority over the mezzanine and junior classes to all principal and
interest cash flows and will not experience any loss of principal until both the entire mezzanine
and junior tranches are written down to zero. We believe this additional credit enhancement is
significant in a deep real estate downturn during which losses are expected to increase
substantially.
The following tables set forth the amortized cost of our AAA non-agency CMBS by type and year
of origination (vintage):
As of March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total AAA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Structures (2005 and Prior) | Securities at | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Super Senior (Post 2004) | Other | Amortized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vintage | Super Senior | Mezzanine | Junior | Other Senior | Subordinate | Other | Cost | |||||||||||||||||||||
2008 |
$ | 66.1 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 66.1 | ||||||||||||||
2007 |
452.1 | | | | | | 452.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
136.0 | | | | | | 136.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
140.6 | 31.2 | | 129.0 | | | 300.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2004 & prior |
| | | 228.1 | 42.0 | 16.7 | 286.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 794.8 | $ | 31.2 | $ | | $ | 357.1 | $ | 42.0 | $ | 16.7 | $ | 1,241.8 | ||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total AAA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Structures (2005 and Prior) | Securities at | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Super Senior (Post 2004) | Other | Amortized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vintage | Super Senior | Mezzanine | Junior | Other Senior | Subordinate | Other | Cost | |||||||||||||||||||||
2008 |
$ | 66.0 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 66.0 | ||||||||||||||
2007 |
469.7 | | | | | | 469.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
135.7 | | | | | | 135.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
147.4 | 31.1 | | 132.8 | | | 311.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2004 & prior |
| | | 310.6 | 42.1 | 19.4 | 372.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 818.8 | $ | 31.1 | $ | | $ | 443.4 | $ | 42.1 | $ | 19.4 | $ | 1,354.8 | ||||||||||||||
As the tables above indicate, our CMBS holdings are predominately in the most senior tranche
of the structure type. As of March 31, 2010, on an amortized cost basis, 92.8% of our AAA-rated
CMBS were in the most senior tranche. Adjusted to remove defeased loans, which are loans whose cash
flows have been replaced by U.S. Treasury securities, the weighted-average credit enhancement of
our CMBS as of March 31, 2010 was 30.8%.
Asset-Backed Securities
The following table provides the amortized cost and fair value of our asset-backed securities,
by underlying collateral type, as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Our other asset-backed
securities are presented as part of other debt obligations.
As of March 31, 2010 | As of December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Other asset-backed securities | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
Auto |
$ | 63.0 | $ | 63.5 | $ | 24.1 | $ | 24.6 | ||||||||
Credit cards |
72.0 | 78.2 | 73.0 | 78.5 | ||||||||||||
Manufactured homes |
19.1 | 15.7 | 19.2 | 15.6 | ||||||||||||
Utility |
10.8 | 11.9 | 10.9 | 11.7 | ||||||||||||
Other |
5.6 | 5.4 | 5.8 | 5.0 | ||||||||||||
Total other asset-backed securities |
$ | 170.5 | $ | 174.7 | $ | 133.0 | $ | 135.4 | ||||||||
Return on Equity-Like Investments
Prospector manages a portfolio of equity and equity-like investments, including publicly
traded common stock and convertible securities. The following table compares our total return to
the benchmark S&P 500 Total Return Index for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. We
believe that these equity and equity-like investments are suitable for funding certain long
duration liabilities in our Income Annuities segment.
48
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Public equity |
5.4 | % | (8.5 | )% | ||||
S&P 500 Total Return Index |
5.4 | (11.0 | ) | |||||
Difference |
0.0 | % | 2.5 | % | ||||
Mortgage Loans
Our mortgage loan department originates new commercial mortgages and manages our existing
commercial mortgage loan portfolio. The commercial mortgage loan holdings are secured by
first-mortgage liens on income-producing commercial real estate, primarily in the retail,
industrial and office building sectors. All loans are underwritten consistently to our standards
based on loan-to-value ratios and debt service coverage based on income and detailed market,
property and borrower analysis using our long-term experience in commercial mortgage lending. A
substantial majority of our loans have personal guarantees and are inspected and evaluated
annually. We attempt to diversify our mortgage loans by geographic region, loan size and scheduled
maturities. On our consolidated balance sheets, mortgage loans are reported net of an allowance for
losses and include a PGAAP adjustment; however, the tables presented below exclude these items.
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, 77.9% and 77.7% respectively, of our mortgage
loans were under $5.0 and our average loan balance was $1.9 for both periods.
Composition of Mortgage Loans
The stress experienced in the U.S. financial markets and unfavorable credit market conditions
led to a decrease in overall liquidity and availability of capital in the commercial mortgage loan
market, which has led to greater opportunities for more selective loan originations. While we have
begun to observe some weakness in commercial real estate fundamentals, as of March 31, 2010, we had
only one non-performing loan in our commercial mortgage loan portfolio. As noted previously, we
believe a disciplined increase in our mortgage loan portfolio will help maintain the overall
quality of our investment portfolio and obtain appropriate yields to match our policyholder
liabilities.
The following table sets forth the carrying value of our investments in commercial mortgage
loans by geographic region:
As of March 31, 2010 | As of December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Region | Carrying Value | % of Total | Carrying Value | % of Total | ||||||||||||
California |
$ | 358.5 | 29.1 | % | $ | 346.0 | 28.6 | % | ||||||||
Washington |
230.0 | 18.6 | 222.9 | 18.5 | ||||||||||||
Texas |
122.3 | 9.9 | 125.6 | 10.4 | ||||||||||||
Oregon |
84.7 | 6.9 | 88.0 | 7.3 | ||||||||||||
Colorado |
45.0 | 3.6 | 44.5 | 3.7 | ||||||||||||
Arizona |
37.9 | 3.1 | 37.1 | 3.1 | ||||||||||||
Minnesota |
31.9 | 2.6 | 32.3 | 2.7 | ||||||||||||
Other |
323.6 | 26.2 | 310.5 | 25.7 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,233.9 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,206.9 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
The following table sets forth the carrying value of our investments in commercial mortgage
loans by property type:
As of March 31, 2010 | As of December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Property Type | Carrying Value | % of Total | Carrying Value | % of Total | ||||||||||||
Shopping Centers and Retail |
$ | 472.9 | 38.3 | % | $ | 472.9 | 39.2 | % | ||||||||
Industrial |
365.6 | 29.6 | 345.7 | 28.6 | ||||||||||||
Office Buildings |
346.5 | 28.1 | 339.2 | 28.1 | ||||||||||||
Multi-Family |
32.8 | 2.7 | 34.9 | 2.9 | ||||||||||||
Other |
16.1 | 1.3 | 14.2 | 1.2 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,233.9 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,206.9 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
49
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the loan-to-value ratios for our mortgage loan portfolio:
As of | As of | |||||||||||||||
March 31, | % of | December 31, | % of | |||||||||||||
Loan-to-Value Ratio | 2010 | Portfolio | 2009 | Portfolio | ||||||||||||
< or = 50% |
$ | 504.5 | 40.9 | % | $ | 484.2 | 40.1 | % | ||||||||
51% 60% |
359.3 | 29.1 | 348.5 | 28.9 | ||||||||||||
61% 70% |
193.9 | 15.7 | 195.8 | 16.2 | ||||||||||||
71% 75% |
68.4 | 5.5 | 68.2 | 5.6 | ||||||||||||
76% 80% |
20.1 | 1.7 | 17.7 | 1.5 | ||||||||||||
81% 100% |
80.3 | 6.5 | 85.1 | 7.1 | ||||||||||||
> 100% |
7.4 | 0.6 | 7.4 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
$ | 1,233.9 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,206.9 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
We use the loan-to-value ratio as our primary metric to assess the quality of our mortgage
loans. The loan-to-value ratio, which is expressed as a percentage, compares the amount of the loan
to the estimated fair value of the underlying property collateralizing the loan. In the year of
funding, loan-to-value ratios are calculated using independent appraisals performed by Member of
the Appraisal Institute, or MAI, designated appraisers. Subsequent to the year of funding,
loan-to-value ratios are updated annually using internal valuations based on property income and
market capitalization rates. Loan-to-value ratios greater than 100% indicate that the loan amount
is greater than the collateral value. A smaller loan-to-value ratio generally indicates a higher
quality loan. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, our mortgage loan portfolio had
weighted-average loan-to-value ratios of 53.1% and 53.5% respectively.
For loans originated in the three months ended March 31, 2010, 53.4% had a loan-to-value ratio
of 50% or less, and no loans had a loan-to-value ratio of more than 70%. For loans originated in
the year ended December 31, 2009, 44.8% had a loan-to-value ratio of 50% or less, and no loans had
a loan-to-value ratio of more than 70%.
Maturity Date of Mortgage Loans
The following table sets forth our mortgage loans by contractual maturity date:
As of March 31, 2010 | As of December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Years to Maturity | Carrying Value | % of Total | Carrying Value | % of Total | ||||||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 5.4 | 0.4 | % | $ | 2.4 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||
Due after one year through five years |
103.7 | 8.4 | 100.0 | 8.3 | ||||||||||||
Due after five years through ten years |
598.8 | 48.5 | 541.8 | 44.9 | ||||||||||||
Due after ten years |
526.0 | 42.7 | 562.7 | 46.6 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,233.9 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,206.9 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Mortgage Loan Quality
Our allowance for losses on mortgage loans provides for the risk of credit loss inherent in
the lending process. The allowance includes a portfolio reserve for probable incurred but not
specifically identified losses and specific reserves for non-performing loans. We define
non-performing loans as loans for which it is probable that amounts due according to the terms of
the loan agreement will not be collected. The portfolio reserve for incurred but not specifically
identified losses considers our past loan experience and the current credit composition of the
portfolio, and takes into consideration market experience. We evaluate the allowance for losses on
mortgage loans as of each reporting period and record adjustments when appropriate.
Our total allowance for losses on mortgage loans was $8.3 and $8.2 as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively, which included a specific reserve of $2.2 related to one
non-performing loan.
Investments in Limited Partnerships Affordable Housing Investments
We invest in tax-advantaged federal affordable housing investments through limited liability
partnerships. These affordable housing investments are typically 15-year investments that provide
tax credits in years one through ten. As of March 31, 2010, we were invested in eight limited
partnership interests related to the federal affordable housing projects and other various state
tax credit
50
Table of Contents
funds. These investments are accounted for under the equity method and are recorded at
amortized cost in investments in limited partnerships, with the present value of unfunded
contributions recorded in other liabilities.
Although these investments decrease our net investment income over time on a pre-tax basis,
they provide us with significant tax benefits, which decrease our effective tax rate. The following
table sets forth the impact the amortization of our investments and the related tax credits had on
net income.
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Amortization related to affordable housing investments, net of tax benefit |
$ | (1.3 | ) | $ | (1.5 | ) | ||
Affordable housing tax credits |
2.8 | 2.4 | ||||||
Impact to net income |
$ | 1.5 | $ | 0.9 | ||||
The following table provides the future estimated impact to net income:
Estimated | ||||
Impact to Net | ||||
Income | ||||
Remainder of 2010 |
$ | 4.0 | ||
2011 |
7.8 | |||
2012 |
8.9 | |||
2013 and beyond |
26.1 | |||
Estimated impact to net income (net of taxes) |
$ | 46.8 | ||
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We conduct all our operations through our operating subsidiaries, and our liquidity
requirements primarily have been and will continue to be met by funds from our subsidiaries.
Dividends and permitted tax sharing payments from our subsidiaries are Symetras principal sources
of cash to pay stockholder dividends and meet its obligations, including payments of principal and
interest on notes payable and tax obligations. On January 27, 2010, we completed an initial public
offering of our common stock and received net proceeds of $282.5, which further enhanced our
liquidity and capital resources. We intend to pay quarterly cash dividends on our common stock and
warrants at a rate of approximately $0.05 per share. The declaration and payment of future
dividends to holders of our common stock will be at the discretion of our board of directors. On
May 12, 2010, our board of directors declared a $0.05 per share dividend to shareholders and
warrant holders of record as of May 26, 2010. See Dividends below for further discussion.
Over the past few years, the global financial markets experienced unprecedented disruption,
adversely affecting the business environment in general, and financial services companies in
particular. During the first quarter of 2010, the credit and equity markets continued to rebound,
and although the credit markets remain tight, we continue to experience a low interest rate
environment. In managing these challenging market conditions over the past couple of years, we
benefited from the strength of our management philosophy, diversification of our business and
strong financial fundamentals. We actively manage our liquidity in light of changing market,
economic and business conditions and we believe that our liquidity levels are more than adequate to
cover our exposures, as evidenced by the following:
| Sales for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were good across all distribution channels. Although below the record levels for the same period in 2009, sales continued to generate strong cash inflows on our deposit contracts (annuities and universal life policies, including BOLI). | ||
| While certain lapses and surrenders occur in the normal course of business, these lapses and surrenders have not deviated materially from management expectations during the financial crisis. | ||
| The amount of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes, on our consolidated balance sheets increased to income of $159.5 as of March 31, 2010, from a loss of $49.7 as of December 31, 2009. The primary driver was an increase in the fair value of our available-for-sale securities, due to the market showing signs of stabilization and credit spreads tightening. We believe we are positioned to hold our investments in an unrealized loss position to maturity because of our mix of insurance products and our disciplined asset/liability matching. We have $7.4 billion of illiquid liabilities consisting of reserves for structured settlements and SPIAs that cannot be surrendered, deferred annuities with five-year payout provisions or market value adjustments (MVA), traditional life insurance, and group life and health policies. |
51
Table of Contents
| As of March 31, 2010, we had the ability to borrow, on an unsecured basis, up to a maximum principal amount of $200.0 under a revolving line of credit arrangement. | ||
| To support the growing sales of our products and maintain financial strength ratings, we target a risk-based capital level of at least 350% in our life insurance company, Symetra Life Insurance Company. As of March 31, 2010, Symetra Life Insurance Company had an estimated risk-based capital ratio of 484%. |
Liquidity Requirements and Sources of Liquidity
The liquidity requirements of our insurance subsidiaries principally relate to the liabilities
associated with their various insurance and investment products, operating costs and expenses, the
payment of dividends to the holding company, and payment of income taxes. Liabilities arising from
insurance and investment products include the payment of benefits, as well as cash payments in
connection with policy and contract surrenders and withdrawals and policy loans. Historically, our
insurance subsidiaries have used cash flows from operations, cash flows from invested assets and
sales of investment securities to fund their liquidity requirements.
In managing the liquidity of our insurance operations, we also consider the risk of
policyholder and contractholder withdrawals of funds earlier than our assumptions when selecting
assets to support these contractual obligations. We use surrender charges and other contract
provisions to mitigate the extent, timing and profitability impact of withdrawals of funds by
customers from annuity contracts and deposit liabilities. The following table sets forth withdrawal
characteristics of our general account annuity reserves and deposit liabilities. This represents
the sum of funds held under deposit contracts and future policy benefits, net of reinsurance
recoverables, on the consolidated balance sheets, excluding other policyholder related liabilities
of $118.2 and $121.6 as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
As of March 31, 2010 | As of December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Amount | % of Total | Amount | % of Total | |||||||||||||
Illiquid Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Structured settlements & other SPIAs(1) |
$ | 6,714.8 | 34.4 | % | $ | 6,703.6 | 35.1 | % | ||||||||
Deferred annuities with 5-year payout provision or MVA(2) |
376.3 | 1.9 | 381.0 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||
Traditional insurance (net of reinsurance)(3) |
186.7 | 1.0 | 185.8 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||
Group health & life (net of reinsurance)(3) |
98.7 | 0.5 | 97.2 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
Total illiquid liabilities |
7,376.5 | 37.8 | 7,367.6 | 38.6 | ||||||||||||
Somewhat Liquid Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Bank-owned life insurance (BOLI)(4) |
3,929.8 | 20.2 | 3,865.1 | 20.2 | ||||||||||||
Deferred annuities with surrender charges of 5% or higher |
5,110.0 | 26.2 | 4,788.2 | 25.1 | ||||||||||||
Universal life with surrender charges of 5% or higher |
159.7 | 0.8 | 152.5 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||
Total somewhat liquid liabilities |
9,199.5 | 47.2 | 8,805.8 | 46.1 | ||||||||||||
Fully Liquid Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Deferred annuities with surrender charges of: |
||||||||||||||||
3% up to 5% |
378.3 | 1.9 | 412.4 | 2.2 | ||||||||||||
Less than 3% |
150.2 | 0.8 | 87.6 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
No surrender charges(5) |
1,936.3 | 9.9 | 1,950.7 | 10.2 | ||||||||||||
Universal life and whole life with surrender charges less than 5% |
439.7 | 2.3 | 441.7 | 2.3 | ||||||||||||
BOLI |
3.6 | 0.0 | 3.7 | 0.0 | ||||||||||||
Traditional insurance (net of reinsurance)(6) |
3.0 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 0.0 | ||||||||||||
Group health & life (net of reinsurance)(6) |
13.4 | 0.1 | 18.4 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Total fully liquid liabilities |
2,924.5 | 15.0 | 2,916.6 | 15.3 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 19,500.5 | 100.0 | % | $ | 19,090.0 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
(1) | These contracts cannot be surrendered. The benefits are specified in the contracts as fixed amounts to be paid over the next several decades. | |
(2) | In a liquidity crisis situation, we could invoke the five-year payout provision so that the contract value with interest is paid out ratably over five years. | |
(3) | The surrender value on these contracts is generally zero. Represents incurred but not reported claim liabilities. |
52
Table of Contents
(4) | The biggest deterrent to surrender is the taxation on the gain within these contracts, which includes a 10% non-deductible penalty tax. Banks can exchange certain of these contracts with other carriers, tax-free. However, a significant portion of this business does not qualify for this tax-free treatment due to the employment status of the original covered employees. | |
(5) | Approximately half of this business has been with the Company for over a decade, contains lifetime minimum interest guarantees of 4.0% to 4.5%, and has been free of surrender charges for many years. This business has experienced high persistency given the high lifetime guarantees that have not been available in the market on new issues for many years. | |
(6) | Represents reported claim liabilities. |
Liquid Assets
Symetras insurance subsidiaries maintain investment strategies intended to provide adequate
funds to pay benefits without forced sales of investments. Products having liabilities with longer
durations, such as certain life insurance policies and structured settlement annuities, are matched
with investments having similar estimated lives such as long-term fixed maturities, mortgage loans
and marketable equity securities. Shorter-term liabilities are matched with fixed maturities that
have short- and medium-term fixed maturities. In addition, our insurance subsidiaries hold highly
liquid, high quality, shorter-term investment securities and other liquid investment-grade fixed
maturities and cash equivalents to fund anticipated operating expenses, surrenders and withdrawals.
We define liquid assets to include cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, publicly
traded fixed maturities and public equity securities. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
our insurance subsidiaries had liquid assets of $19.0 billion and $18.1 billion, respectively, and
Symetra had cash and cash equivalents of $55.5 and $36.6, respectively. The portion of total
company liquid assets comprised of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments was $443.3
and $259.9 as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Our liquid assets increased as
a result of uninvested cash from sales of deferred annuities in the first quarter and our IPO
proceeds, as it continues to be challenging to invest in quality investments with acceptable
yields.
We consider attributes of the various categories of liquid assets (for example, type of asset
and credit quality) in evaluating the adequacy of our insurance operations liquidity under a
variety of stress scenarios. We believe that the liquidity profile of our assets is sufficient to
satisfy current liquidity requirements, including under foreseeable stress scenarios.
Given the size and liquidity profile of our investment portfolio, we believe that claim
experience varying from our projections does not constitute a significant liquidity risk. Our
asset/liability management process takes into account the expected maturity of investments and
expected claim payments as well as the specific nature and risk profile of the liabilities.
Historically, there has been limited variation between the expected maturities of our investments
and the payment of claims.
Capitalization
Our capital structure consists of notes payable and stockholders equity. The following table
summarizes our capital structure as of the dates indicated:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Notes payable |
$ | 448.9 | $ | 448.9 | ||||
Stockholders equity |
1,971.7 | 1,433.3 | ||||||
Total capital |
$ | 2,420.6 | $ | 1,882.2 | ||||
Our capitalization increased as of March 31, 2010, as compared to December 31, 2009 due to an
increase in stockholders equity. This increase was driven by the net proceeds received from our
IPO, an increase in AOCI and the generation of net income of $46.3. AOCI improved primarily due to
an increase in net unrealized gains on available-for-sale corporate securities. We believe our
capital levels position us well to capitalize on organic growth as well as pursue any potentially
favorable acquisition opportunities.
Dividends
On May 12, 2010 we declared a dividend of $0.05 per common share to shareholders and warrant
holders of record as of May 26, 2010, for an approximate total of $6.9, to be payable on June 9,
2010.
53
Table of Contents
Cash Flows
The following table sets forth a summary of our consolidated cash flows for the dates
indicated.
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net cash flows from operating activities |
$ | 209.6 | $ | 168.2 | ||||
Net cash flows from investing activities |
(544.1 | ) | (977.7 | ) | ||||
Net cash flows from financing activities |
466.0 | 662.1 |
Operating Activities
Cash flows from our operating activities are primarily driven by the amounts and timing of
cash received for premiums on our group medical stop-loss, group life and term life insurance
products, income including dividends and interest on our investments, as well as the amounts and
timing of cash disbursed for our payment of policyholder benefits and claims, underwriting and
operating expenses and income taxes. The following discussion highlights key drivers in the level
of cash flows generated from our operating activities:
Net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was
$209.6, a $41.4 increase over the same period in 2009. This increase was primarily the result of
increased net investment income driven by an increase in account values, a decline in paid
commissions related to our deferred annuity products on lower sales, and a decrease in group
medical stop-loss paid claims.
Investing Activities
Cash flows from our investing activities are primarily driven by the amounts and timing of
cash received from our sales of investments and from maturities and calls of fixed maturity
securities, as well as the amounts and timing of cash disbursed for our purchases of investments.
The following discussion highlights key drivers in the level of cash flows generated from our
investing activities:
Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $544.1, a
$433.6 decrease over the same period in 2009. This decrease was primarily the result of lower
purchases driven by lower sales of fixed deferred annuities. In addition we benefitted from
strategic sales of fixed maturities at a gain in the current period.
Financing Activities
Cash flows from our financing activities are primarily driven by the amounts and timing of
cash received from deposits into certain life insurance and annuity policies and proceeds from our
issuances of debt and common stock, as well as the amounts and timing of cash disbursed to fund
withdrawals from certain life insurance and annuity policies, repayments of debt and dividend
distributions to our stockholders. The following discussion highlights key drivers in the level of
cash flows generated from our financing activities:
Net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was
$466.0, a $196.1 decrease over the same period in 2009. This was primarily due to a $521.6 decrease
in deposits primarily related to lower sales of fixed deferred annuities referred to in investing
activities above. This was partially offset by IPO proceeds.
Off-balance Sheet Transactions
We do not have off-balance sheet transactions.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of change in the value of financial instruments as a result of
absolute or relative changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, or equity or
commodity prices. To varying degrees, the investment and trading activities supporting all of our
products and services generate market risks. There have been no material changes in our market risk
exposures from December 31, 2009, a description of which may be found in Part II, Item 7A
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009. See Item 1A Risk Factors for a
54
Table of Contents
discussion of how changes to the operating and investing markets may materially adversely affect
our business and results of operations.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation required by the 1934 Act, under the supervision and with the
participation of our principal executive and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of
the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a 15(e)
of the 1934 Act, as of March 31, 2010. Based on this evaluation our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2010, our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed
by us in the reports that we file or submit under the 1934 Act is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and to provide
reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Limitations on Controls
Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of
achieving their objectives as specified above. Management does not expect, however, that our
disclosure controls and procedures will prevent or detect all errors or fraud. Any control system,
no matter how well designed and operated, is based on certain assumptions and can provide only
reasonable, not absolute, assurance that its objectives will be met. Further, no evaluation of
controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or
that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
55
Table of Contents
PART II Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Disclosure concerning material legal proceedings can be found in Item 1. Financial
Statements, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 9, Commitments and Contingencies
under the caption, Litigation, which is incorporated here by this reference.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, consideration should be given
to the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009. If any of those factors were to occur, they could materially
adversely affect our business, financial condition or future results and could cause actual results
to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements in this report. Other than
as set forth below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in the
above-referenced filing as of March 31, 2010.
The implementation of The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act could have a material
adverse effect on the profitability or marketability of the health insurance products that we
sell.
On March 23, 2010, President Obama signed into law The Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act (PPACA), which brings substantial change to the insurance coverage for medical costs. Some of
these changes apply primarily to fully insured group health plans (which we do not currently
provide), but some provisions apply to self-funded plans, and thus, the medical stop-loss coverage
offered by us. While many of the changes do not take effect until January 1, 2014, some take effect
for benefit plan years beginning on or after September 23, 2010.
We
believe that the most significant impacts of the PPACA to the Companys medical stop-loss
product are the elimination of lifetime benefit maximums, and significant restrictions on annual
benefit maximums. These maximums serve to cap the amounts we could be liable for under our medical
stop-loss product. Currently, our reinsurance agreements have limitations on the amount of medical
benefit costs for which we can be reimbursed by our reinsurance carriers. With the elimination of
lifetime benefit maximums and restrictions on annual benefit maximums from our medical stop-loss
product, we may not be fully reimbursed for medical benefit costs by our reinsurance carriers. We
face significant risk if we are unable to effectively manage and reinsure this risk.
While certain provisions of the PPACA could adversely affect us, because of the recent
enactment of the PPACA, and the remaining uncertainty regarding certain of its provisions it is
difficult to predict the PPACAs effect on the profitability or marketability of the health
insurance products and services we sell. Similarly, it is difficult to predict the effect the PPACA
will have on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. We will continue to
monitor the implementation of the PPACA and reassess our business strategies accordingly.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Use of Proceeds from Initial Public Offering
On January 27, 2010, we completed the sale of 34,960,000 shares of common stock at an initial
public offering price of $12.00 per share. We received net proceeds from the offering of $282.5
million, reflecting the gross proceeds of $303.1 million, net of underwriting fees of $17.4 million
and offering expenses of $3.2 million.
As we reported in our 2009 10-K, we contributed $236.6 million of the IPO proceeds to our
subsidiaries to fund organic growth. Since that date, we used the remaining $45.9 million of IPO
proceeds for investments in mortgage-backed securities. We retained this portion of the IPO
proceeds in the holding company rather than contributing such amount to our insurance subsidiaries
because of the insurance laws and regulations that can restrict the timing and amount of dividends
and other distributions to the holding company from our insurance subsidiaries.
56
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description | |
10.14
|
Annual Incentive Bonus Plan* | |
10.21
|
Form of Restricted Stock Pursuant to the Symetra Financial Corporation Equity Plan* | |
10.22
|
Form of Performance Unit Award Agreement Pursuant to the Symetra Financial Corporation Equity Plan 2010-2012 Grant* | |
10.23
|
Symetra Financial Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (amended and restated on May 11, 2010)* | |
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended* | |
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended* | |
32.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* | |
32.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* | |
99.01
|
Audit Committee Independent Auditor Services Pre-Approval Policy* |
* | Filed herewith |
57
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
SYMETRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
||||
Date: May 14, 2010 | By: | /s/ Randall H. Talbot | ||
Name: | Randall H. Talbot | |||
Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer | |||
Date: May 14, 2010 | By: | /s/ Margaret A. Meister | ||
Name: | Margaret A. Meister | |||
Title: | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |||
58