Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-10.1 - EXHIBIT 10.1 - COLONIAL PROPERTIES TRUST | c00443exv10w1.htm |
EX-12.1 - EXHIBIT 12.1 - COLONIAL PROPERTIES TRUST | c00443exv12w1.htm |
EX-32.4 - EXHIBIT 32.4 - COLONIAL PROPERTIES TRUST | c00443exv32w4.htm |
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - COLONIAL PROPERTIES TRUST | c00443exv32w2.htm |
EX-31.3 - EXHIBIT 31.3 - COLONIAL PROPERTIES TRUST | c00443exv31w3.htm |
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - COLONIAL PROPERTIES TRUST | c00443exv32w1.htm |
EX-32.3 - EXHIBIT 32.3 - COLONIAL PROPERTIES TRUST | c00443exv32w3.htm |
EX-12.2 - EXHIBIT 12.2 - COLONIAL PROPERTIES TRUST | c00443exv12w2.htm |
EX-31.4 - EXHIBIT 31.4 - COLONIAL PROPERTIES TRUST | c00443exv31w4.htm |
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - COLONIAL PROPERTIES TRUST | c00443exv31w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - COLONIAL PROPERTIES TRUST | c00443exv31w2.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the quarterly period ended: March 31, 2010
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number:
1-12358 (Colonial Properties Trust)
0-20707 (Colonial Realty Limited Partnership)
1-12358 (Colonial Properties Trust)
0-20707 (Colonial Realty Limited Partnership)
COLONIAL PROPERTIES TRUST
COLONIAL REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
COLONIAL REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Alabama (Colonial Properties Trust) Delaware (Colonial Realty Limited Partnership) |
59-7007599 63-1098468 |
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
2101 Sixth Avenue North, Suite 750, Birmingham, Alabama 35203
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(205) 250-8700
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Colonial Properties Trust | YES þ | NO o | ||||
Colonial Realty Limited Partnership | YES þ | NO o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Colonial Properties Trust | YES o | NO o | ||||
Colonial Realty Limited Partnership | YES o | NO o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Colonial Properties Trust Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||||
(Do not check if smaller reporting company) |
||||||||
Colonial Realty Limited
Partnership Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ | Smaller reporting company o | |||||
(Do not check if smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Colonial Properties Trust | YES o | NO þ | ||||
Colonial Realty Limited Partnership | YES o | NO þ |
As of May 5, 2010, Colonial Properties Trust had 70,083,087 Common Shares of Beneficial Interest
outstanding.
COLONIAL PROPERTIES TRUST
COLONIAL REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
COLONIAL REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
Page | ||||||||
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
||||||||
Item 1. Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements: |
||||||||
Colonial Properties Trust |
||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
8 | ||||||||
Colonial Realty Limited Partnership |
||||||||
25 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
28 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
46 | ||||||||
61 | ||||||||
62 | ||||||||
62 | ||||||||
63 | ||||||||
63 | ||||||||
64 | ||||||||
65 | ||||||||
Exhibit 10.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 12.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 12.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.3 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.4 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.3 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.4 |
2
Table of Contents
Explanatory Note
This Form 10-Q includes information with respect to both Colonial Properties Trust (the Trust)
and Colonial Realty Limited Partnership (CRLP), of which the Trust is the sole general partner
and in which the Trust owned an 89.5% limited partner interest as of March 31, 2010. The Trust
conducts all of its business and owns all of its properties through CRLP and CRLPs various
subsidiaries. Separate financial statements and accompanying notes are provided for each of the
Trust and CRLP. Except as specifically noted otherwise, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations is presented as a single discussion with respect to
both the Trust and CRLP since the Trust conducts all of its business and owns all of its properties
through CRLP and CRLPs various subsidiaries.
3
Table of Contents
COLONIAL PROPERTIES TRUST
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(audited) | ||||||||
March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Land, buildings & equipment |
$ | 3,211,973 | $ | 3,210,350 | ||||
Undeveloped land and construction in progress |
276,009 | 237,100 | ||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
(549,677 | ) | (519,728 | ) | ||||
Real estate assets held for sale, net |
33,950 | 65,022 | ||||||
Net real estate assets |
2,972,255 | 2,992,744 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
3,762 | 4,590 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
7,752 | 7,952 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
34,397 | 33,934 | ||||||
Notes receivable |
17,366 | 22,208 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
16,916 | 16,503 | ||||||
Deferred debt and lease costs |
21,687 | 22,560 | ||||||
Investment in partially-owned entities |
15,693 | 17,422 | ||||||
Other assets |
52,740 | 54,719 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,142,568 | $ | 3,172,632 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
Notes and mortgages payable |
$ | 1,360,674 | $ | 1,393,797 | ||||
Unsecured credit facility |
312,632 | 310,546 | ||||||
Total debt |
1,673,306 | 1,704,343 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
26,171 | 28,299 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
17,809 | 13,133 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
18,528 | 26,142 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
12,350 | 15,054 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
1,748,164 | 1,786,971 | ||||||
Redeemable Noncontrolling interest: |
||||||||
Common units |
137,695 | 133,537 | ||||||
Equity: |
||||||||
Preferred shares of beneficial interest, $.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares
authorized:
8 1/8% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of
Beneficial Interest, liquidation preference $25 per depositary share,
4,004,735 depositary shares (Liquidation value $100,118,000) issued and
outstanding
at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
4 | 4 | ||||||
Common shares of beneficial interest, $.01 par value, 125,000,000 shares
authorized; 74,932,871 and 71,989,227 shares issued at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively |
749 | 720 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
1,787,289 | 1,760,362 | ||||||
Cumulative earnings |
1,287,706 | 1,296,188 | ||||||
Cumulative distributions |
(1,766,877 | ) | (1,753,015 | ) | ||||
Noncontrolling interest: |
||||||||
Limited partners noncontrolling interest |
844 | 985 | ||||||
7 1/4% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units |
100,000 | 100,000 | ||||||
Treasury shares, at cost; 5,623,150 shares at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 |
(150,163 | ) | (150,163 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(2,843 | ) | (2,957 | ) | ||||
Total equity |
1,256,709 | 1,252,124 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 3,142,568 | $ | 3,172,632 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
COLONIAL PROPERTIES TRUST
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||
Minimum rent |
$ | 73,482 | $ | 70,239 | ||||
Tenant recoveries |
2,789 | 1,066 | ||||||
Other property related revenue |
11,544 | 9,500 | ||||||
Construction revenues |
| 35 | ||||||
Other non-property related revenue |
2,898 | 3,455 | ||||||
Total revenue |
90,713 | 84,295 | ||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||
Property operating expenses |
25,419 | 22,469 | ||||||
Taxes, licenses and insurance |
11,059 | 10,976 | ||||||
Construction expenses |
| 34 | ||||||
Property management expenses |
1,807 | 1,918 | ||||||
General and administrative expenses |
4,807 | 4,382 | ||||||
Management fees and other expenses |
2,673 | 4,217 | ||||||
Restructuring charges |
| 812 | ||||||
Investment and development |
3 | 165 | ||||||
Depreciation |
30,279 | 27,785 | ||||||
Amortization |
2,224 | 873 | ||||||
Impairment and other losses |
783 | 1,054 | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
79,054 | 74,685 | ||||||
Income from operations |
11,659 | 9,610 | ||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||
Interest expense |
(20,901 | ) | (20,432 | ) | ||||
Debt cost amortization |
(1,185 | ) | (1,303 | ) | ||||
Gains on retirement of debt |
28 | 25,319 | ||||||
Interest income |
393 | 301 | ||||||
Income (loss) from partially-owned investments |
270 | (650 | ) | |||||
Loss on hedging activities |
| (1,063 | ) | |||||
(Loss) gain from sales of property, net of income taxes of $0 (1Q10) and $3,177 (1Q09) |
(7 | ) | 5,380 | |||||
Income taxes and other |
(249 | ) | 3,090 | |||||
Total other income (expense) |
(21,651 | ) | 10,642 | |||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
(9,992 | ) | 20,252 | |||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
(32 | ) | 541 | |||||
(Loss) gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes of $0 (1Q10) and $26 (1Q09) |
(35 | ) | 45 | |||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
(67 | ) | 586 | |||||
Net (loss) income |
(10,059 | ) | 20,838 | |||||
Noncontrolling interest |
||||||||
Continuing Operations |
||||||||
Noncontrolling interest in CRLP common unitholders |
1,492 | (2,368 | ) | |||||
Noncontrolling interest in CRLP preferred unitholders |
(1,813 | ) | (1,813 | ) | ||||
Noncontrolling interest of limited partners |
82 | (1,009 | ) | |||||
Discontinued Operations |
||||||||
Noncontrolling interest in CRLP from discontinued operations |
8 | (163 | ) | |||||
Noncontrolling interest of limited partners |
(5 | ) | 468 | |||||
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
(236 | ) | (4,885 | ) | ||||
Net (loss) income attributable to parent company |
(10,295 | ) | 15,953 | |||||
Dividends to preferred shareholders |
(2,034 | ) | (2,073 | ) | ||||
Preferred share issuance costs write-off, net of discount |
| (5 | ) | |||||
Net (loss) income available to common shareholders |
$ | (12,329 | ) | $ | 13,875 | |||
Net (loss) income per common share Basic: |
||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
$ | (0.19 | ) | $ | 0.27 | |||
Income from discontinued operations |
| 0.02 | ||||||
Net (loss) income per common share Basic |
$ | (0.19 | ) | $ | 0.29 | |||
Net (loss) income per common share Diluted: |
||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
$ | (0.19 | ) | $ | 0.27 | |||
Income from discontinued operations |
| 0.02 | ||||||
Net (loss) income per common share Diluted |
$ | (0.19 | ) | $ | 0.29 | |||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
66,426 | 48,202 | ||||||
Diluted |
66,426 | 48,202 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
COLONIAL PROPERTIES TRUST
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (10,059 | ) | $ | 20,838 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
32,632 | 29,296 | ||||||
(Income) loss from unconsolidated entities |
(270 | ) | 650 | |||||
Losses (gains) from sales of property |
42 | (8,537 | ) | |||||
Impairment and other losses |
783 | 1,054 | ||||||
Gain on retirement of debt |
(28 | ) | (25,319 | ) | ||||
Distributions of income from unconsolidated entities |
1,872 | 3,800 | ||||||
Other, net |
1,315 | 1,094 | ||||||
Change in: |
||||||||
Restricted cash |
200 | (1,652 | ) | |||||
Accounts receivable |
(463 | ) | 175 | |||||
Prepaid expenses |
(507 | ) | (7,190 | ) | ||||
Other assets |
248 | 3,832 | ||||||
Change in: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
492 | (13,540 | ) | |||||
Accrued interest |
4,676 | 2,830 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other |
(10,318 | ) | 10,367 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
20,615 | 17,698 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Acquisition of properties |
(225 | ) | | |||||
Development expenditures |
(6,127 | ) | (22,758 | ) | ||||
Tenant improvements and leasing commissions |
(361 | ) | | |||||
Capital expenditures |
(6,088 | ) | (2,759 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of property, net of selling costs |
1,327 | 32,805 | ||||||
Issuance of notes receivable |
| (249 | ) | |||||
Repayments of notes receivable |
4,842 | 55 | ||||||
Distributions from unconsolidated entities |
| | ||||||
Capital contributions to unconsolidated entities |
(7 | ) | (41 | ) | ||||
Sale of securities |
| 467 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
(6,639 | ) | 7,520 | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from additional borrowings |
| 350,000 | ||||||
Proceeds from dividend reinvestment plan and exercise of
stock options |
386 | 109 | ||||||
Proceeds from common share issuance, net of expenses |
32,461 | | ||||||
Principal reductions of debt |
(33,224 | ) | (71,777 | ) | ||||
Payment of debt issuance costs |
| (4,126 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from borrowings on revolving credit lines |
240,000 | 210,000 | ||||||
Payments on revolving credit lines and overdrafts |
(239,342 | ) | (490,788 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid to common and preferred shareholders |
(13,862 | ) | (16,042 | ) | ||||
Distributions to noncontrolling partners in CRLP |
(1,223 | ) | (2,215 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(14,804 | ) | (24,839 | ) | ||||
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(828 | ) | 379 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
4,590 | 9,185 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 3,762 | $ | 9,564 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for interest, including
amounts capitalized |
$ | 16,593 | $ | 19,844 | ||||
Cash (received) paid during the period for income taxes |
$ | (133 | ) | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
COLONIAL PROPERTIES TRUST
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
Series D | Additional | Limited Partners | Series B | Accumulated Other | Total | Redeemable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred | Common | Paid-In | Cumulative | Cumulative | Noncontrolling | Preferred | Treasury | Comprehensive | Shareholders | Common | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 | Shares | Shares | Capital | Earnings | Distributions | Interest | Units | Shares | Loss | Equity | Units | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2008 |
$ | 4 | $ | 542 | $ | 1,619,897 | $ | 1,281,330 | $ | (1,700,739 | ) | $ | 1,943 | $ | 100,000 | $ | (150,163 | ) | $ | (5,205 | ) | $ | 1,147,609 | $ | 124,848 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
17,766 | 541 | 18,307 | $ | 2,531 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment for amounts included in net income |
1,206 | 1,206 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions on common shares ($0.25 per share) |
(12,156 | ) | (12,156 | ) | (2,215 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions on preferred shares |
(2,073 | ) | (2,073 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions on preferred units of CRLP |
(1,813 | ) | (1,813 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Restricted Common Shares of
Beneficial Interest |
(315 | ) | (315 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of stock based compensation |
513 | 513 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cancellation of vested restricted shares to pay
taxes |
(37 | ) | (37 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares of beneficial
interest through the Companys dividend
reinvestment plan and Employee Stock
Purchase Plan |
109 | 109 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares of beneficial
interest through conversion of units from
Colonial Realty Limited Partnership |
31 | 31 | (31 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in interest of limited partners |
(995 | ) | (995 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in redemption value of common units |
7,168 | 7,168 | (7,168 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance March 31, 2009 |
$ | 4 | $ | 542 | $ | 1,627,366 | $ | 1,299,096 | $ | (1,716,781 | ) | $ | 1,489 | $ | 100,000 | $ | (150,163 | ) | $ | (3,999 | ) | $ | 1,157,554 | $ | 117,965 | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2009 |
$ | 4 | $ | 720 | $ | 1,760,362 | $ | 1,296,188 | $ | (1,753,015 | ) | $ | 985 | $ | 100,000 | $ | (150,163 | ) | $ | (2,957 | ) | $ | 1,252,124 | $ | 133,537 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
(8,482 | ) | (77 | ) | (8,559 | ) | $ | (1,500 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment for amounts included in net income |
114 | 114 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions on common shares ($0.15 per share) |
(10,015 | ) | (10,015 | ) | (1,223 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions on preferred shares |
(2,034 | ) | (2,034 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions on preferred units of CRLP |
(1,813 | ) | (1,813 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Restricted Common Shares of
Beneficial Interest |
4 | 825 | 829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of stock based compensation |
165 | 165 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares of beneficial
interest through the Companys dividend
reinvestment plan and Employee Stock
Purchase Plan |
382 | 382 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares of beneficial
interest through conversion of units from
Colonial Realty Limited Partnership |
131 | 131 | (131 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity Offering Programs, net of cost |
25 | 32,436 | 32,461 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in interest of limited partners |
(64 | ) | (64 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in redemption value of common units |
(7,012 | ) | (7,012 | ) | 7,012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance March 31, 2010 |
$ | 4 | $ | 749 | $ | 1,787,289 | $ | 1,287,706 | $ | (1,766,877 | ) | $ | 844 | $ | 100,000 | $ | (150,163 | ) | $ | (2,843 | ) | $ | 1,256,709 | $ | 137,695 | |||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
COLONIAL PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
The consolidated condensed financial statements of Colonial Properties Trust (the
Trust) have been prepared pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules and
regulations. The following notes, which represent interim disclosures as required by the SEC,
highlight significant changes to the notes included in the December 31, 2009 audited consolidated
financial statements of Colonial Properties Trust and should be read together with the consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto included in the Colonial Properties Trust 2009 Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
Note 1 Organization and Business
As used herein, the Company means Colonial Properties Trust, an Alabama real estate
investment trust (REIT) and one or more of its subsidiaries and other affiliates, including
Colonial Realty Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership (CRLP), Colonial Properties
Services, Inc. (CPSI), Colonial Properties Services Limited Partnership (CPSLP) and CLNL
Acquisition Sub, LLC (CLNL). The Company was originally formed as a Maryland REIT on July 9,
1993 and reorganized as an Alabama REIT under a new Alabama REIT statute on August 21, 1995. The
Company is a multifamily-focused self-administered and self-managed equity REIT, which means that
it is engaged in the acquisition, development, ownership, management and leasing of multifamily
apartment communities and other commercial real estate properties. The Companys activities
include full or partial ownership and operation of a portfolio of 156 properties as of March 31,
2010, consisting of multifamily and commercial properties located in Alabama, Arizona, Florida,
Georgia, Nevada, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia. As of March 31,
2010, including properties in lease-up, the Company owns interests in 111 multifamily apartment
communities (including 105 consolidated properties, of which 104 are wholly-owned and one is
partially-owned, and six properties partially-owned through unconsolidated joint venture entities),
and 45 commercial properties, consisting of 30 office properties (including four wholly-owned
consolidated properties and 26 properties partially-owned through unconsolidated joint venture
entities) and 15 retail properties (including five wholly-owned consolidated properties and 10
properties partially-owned through unconsolidated joint venture entities).
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Unaudited Interim Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated condensed financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for
interim financial information, including rules and regulations of the SEC. Accordingly, the interim
financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally
accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation
have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2010, are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.
Except for the impact from the adoption of new accounting pronouncements (see Note 2), the
consolidated condensed balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited
financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes
required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial
statements.
Federal Income Tax Status
The Company, which is considered a corporation for federal income tax purposes, qualifies as a
REIT and generally will not be subject to federal income tax to the extent it distributes its REIT
taxable income to its shareholders. REITs are subject to a number of organizational and
operational requirements. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the
Company will be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate rates.
The Company may also be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on its income and
property and to federal income and excise taxes on its
undistributed income even if it does qualify as a REIT. For example, the Company will
be subject to income tax to the extent it distributes less than 100% of its REIT taxable income
(including capital gains) and the Company has certain gains that, if recognized, will be subject to
corporate tax because it acquired the assets in tax-free acquisitions of non-REIT corporations.
8
Table of Contents
The Companys consolidated financial statements include the operations of a taxable REIT
subsidiary, CPSI, which is not entitled to a dividends paid deduction and is subject to federal,
state and local income taxes. CPSI uses the liability method of accounting for income taxes.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities result from temporary differences. Temporary
differences are differences between tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts
in the financial statements that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future periods.
CPSI provides property development, construction services, leasing and management services for
joint-venture and third-party owned properties and administrative services to the Company and
engages in for-sale development and condominium conversion activity. The Company generally
reimburses CPSI for payroll and other costs incurred in providing services to the Company. All
inter-company transactions are eliminated in the accompanying consolidated condensed financial
statements. CPSI has an income tax receivable of $17.7 million and $17.8 million as of March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, which is included in Accounts receivable, net on the
Companys Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet. CPSIs consolidated provision for income
taxes was zero for each of the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. CPSIs effective income
tax rate was 0% for each of the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
Tax years 2003 through 2009 are subject to examination by the federal taxing authorities.
Generally, tax years 2006 through 2008 are subject to examination by state taxing authorities.
There is one state tax examination currently in process.
On November 6, 2009, the Worker, Homeownership and Business Assistance Act of 2009 was signed
into law, which expands the net operating loss (NOL) carryback rules to allow businesses to
carryback NOLs incurred in either 2008 or 2009 up to five years. As a result of the new
legislation, CPSI is able to carryback tax losses that occurred in the year ending December 31,
2009 against income that was recognized in 2005 and 2006. During the fourth quarter 2009, CPSI
recorded an income tax benefit as a result of the new NOL carryback rules. Refunds are anticipated
to be collected in 2010.
On February 17, 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Act) was
signed into law. Section 1231 of the Act allows some business taxpayers to elect to defer
cancellation of indebtedness income when the taxpayer repurchases applicable debt instruments after
December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2011. Under the Act, the cancellation of indebtedness
income in 2009 could be deferred for five years (until 2014), and the cancellation of indebtedness
income in 2010 could be deferred for four years (until 2014), subject in both cases to acceleration
events. After the deferral period, 20% of the cancellation of indebtedness income would be
included in taxpayers gross income in each of the next five taxable years. The deferral is an
irrevocable election made on the taxpayers income tax return for the taxable year of the
reacquisition. The Company anticipates making this election with regard to a portion of the CRLP
debt repurchased in 2009.
The Company may from time to time be assessed interest or penalties by major tax
jurisdictions, although any such assessments historically have been minimal and immaterial to the
Companys financial results. When the Company has received an assessment for interest and/or
penalties, it has been classified in the financial statements as income tax expense.
Notes Receivable
Notes receivable consists primarily of promissory notes representing loans by the Company to
third parties. The Company records notes receivable at cost. The Company evaluates the
collectability of both interest and principal for each of its notes to determine whether they are
impaired. A note is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is
probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the existing
contractual terms. When a note is considered to be impaired, the amount of the allowance is
calculated by comparing the recorded investment to either the value determined by discounting the
expected future cash flows at the notes effective interest rate or to the value of the collateral
if the note is collateral dependent.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company had notes receivable of $19.2 million, consisting primarily
of a $16.9 million seller-financing note with a five year term at an interest rate of 5.6%
associated with the disposition of Colonial Promenade at Fultondale in February 2009. In November
2009, the Company disposed of a tract of land for $7.3 million, which included a $5.0 million
seller-financing note for a term of six months at an interest rate of 7.5%. The balance on this
note was paid in full in March 2010.
The Company had accrued interest related to its outstanding notes receivable of $0.1 million
as of March 31, 2010 and 2009. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had
recorded a reserve of $1.9 million against its
outstanding notes receivable and accrued interest. The weighted average interest rate on the notes
receivable outstanding at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was approximately 5.6% and 6.0%,
respectively. Interest income is recognized on an accrual basis.
9
Table of Contents
Fair Value Measures
The Company applies
ASC 820-10 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, in relation to the
valuation of real estate assets recorded at fair value, to its impairment valuation analysis of
real estate assets (see Note 4) and to its disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments,
principally indebtedness (see Note 12) and notes receivable (see above). The disclosure of
estimated fair values was determined by management using available market information, considering
market participant assumptions and appropriate valuation methodologies available to management at
March 31, 2010. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated
fair value. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the estimates presented below, using Level
2 and 3 inputs, are indicative of the amounts the Company could realize on disposition of the real
estate assets or financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation
methodologies could have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
The following table presents the Companys real estate assets reported at fair market value
and the related level in the fair value hierarchy as defined by ASC 820 used to measure those
assets, liabilities and disclosures:
(in thousands) | Fair value measurements as of March 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Assets (Liabilities) | Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||
Real estate assets,
including land held for
sale |
$ | 31,451 | $ | | $ | | $ | 31,451 |
Real estate assets, including land held for sale were valued using sales activity for
similar assets, current contracts and other inputs management believes are consistent with those
that market participants would use.
At March 31, 2010, the estimated fair value of fixed rate debt was approximately $1.31 billion
(carrying value of $1.35 billion) and the estimated fair value of the Companys variable rate debt,
including the Companys unsecured credit facility, is consistent with the carrying value of $325.9
million.
The estimated fair value of the Companys notes receivable at March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009 was approximately $17.4 million and $22.2 million, respectively, based on market rates and
similar financing arrangements.
Accounting Pronouncements
Pronouncements Recently Adopted
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. FIN 46(R),
now known as ASC 810-10-30, Initial Measurement. ASC 810-10-30 amends the manner in which entities
evaluate whether consolidation is required for variable interest entities (VIEs). A company must
first perform a qualitative analysis in determining whether it must consolidate a VIE, and if the
qualitative analysis is not determinative, must perform a quantitative analysis. Further, ASC
810-10-30 requires that companies continually evaluate VIEs for consolidation, rather than
assessing based upon the occurrence of triggering events. ASC 810-10-30 also requires enhanced
disclosures about how a companys involvement with a VIE affects its financial statements and
exposure to risks. ASC 810-10-30 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC 810-10-30 did not have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated condensed financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, an update to Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements
and Disclosures. ASU 2010-06 provides an update specifically to Subtopic 820-10 that requires new
disclosures including, details of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2
measurements and the reasons for the transfers and a gross presentation of activity within the
Level 3 roll forward, presenting separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements. ASU 2010-06 is effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning
after December 15, 2009, except for the gross
presentation of the Level 3 roll forward, which is required for interim and annual reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated condensed financial statements.
10
Table of Contents
Note 3 Restructuring Charges
As a result of the Companys 2009 initiative to improve efficiencies with respect to
management of its existing properties and operation of the Companys portfolio, including reducing
overhead and postponing or phasing future development activities, during the three months ended
March 31, 2009, the Company reduced its workforce by eliminating certain positions resulting in the
incurrence of an aggregate of $0.8 million in termination benefits and severance related charges.
Of the $0.8 million in restructuring charges, approximately $0.4 million was associated with the
Companys multifamily segment, including $0.2 million associated with development personnel, $0.3
million was associated with the Companys commercial segment, including $0.2 million associated
with development personnel, and $0.1 million were non-divisional charges.
The expenses of the Companys reduction in workforce and other termination costs, as described
above, are included in Restructuring charges in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of
Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Note 4 Impairment
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded $0.8 million as a result of
casualty losses at three multifamily apartment communities. The losses at two of these communities
were a result of fire damage and the loss at the other community was a result of carport structural
damage caused by inclement weather.
In February 2009, the Company reached an agreement in principle to transfer its remaining
noncontrolling joint venture interest in Colonial Pinnacle Craft Farms I, a 220,000-square-foot
(excluding anchor-owned square-footage) retail shopping center located in Gulf Shores, Alabama, to
the majority joint venture partner. As a result of this agreement and the resulting asset
valuation, the Company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $0.7 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2009, which represented the Companys remaining equity interest in the joint
venture.
In March 2009, the Company completed the sale of the remaining 17 unsold units at the
Regents Park for-sale residential project located in Atlanta, Georgia for $16.3 million in cash.
Since the carrying value exceeded the sales price of the units, the Company recorded an
impairment charge of $0.3 million.
These charges, as described above, are included in Impairment and other losses in the
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
The Companys determination of fair value is based on inputs management believes are
consistent with those that market participants would use. The Company estimates the fair value of
each property and development project evaluated for impairment based on current market conditions
and assumptions made by management, which may differ materially from actual results if market
conditions continue to deteriorate or improve. Specific facts and circumstances of each project
are evaluated, including local market conditions, traffic, sales velocity, relative pricing and
cost structure. The Company will continue to monitor the specific facts and circumstances at the
Companys for-sale properties and development projects. Existing economic and market uncertainties
may impact the number of projects the Company can sell, the timing of the sales and/or the prices
at which the Company can sell them in future periods, and may result in additional impairment
charges in connection with sales. If the Company is unable to sell projects, the Company may incur
additional impairment charges on projects previously impaired as well as on projects not currently
impaired but for which indicators of impairment may exist, which would decrease the value of the
Companys assets as reflected on the balance sheet and adversely affect net income and equity.
There can be no assurances of the amount or pace of future property sales and closings,
particularly given current economic and market conditions.
11
Table of Contents
Note 5 Disposition Activity
Net income and gain on disposition of real estate for properties sold in which the Company
does not maintain continuing involvement are reflected in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of
Operations as Discontinued Operations for all periods presented. All of the operating properties
sold during 2009 in which the Company did not maintain a continuing
interest were classified as discontinued operations. The following are the properties the
Company disposed of in 2009 that are classified as discontinued operations:
Units/ Square | ||||||||
Property | Location | Date Sold | Feet | |||||
Multifamily |
||||||||
Portofino at Jensen Beach |
Port St. Lucie, FL | September 2009 | 118 | |||||
Murano at Delray Beach |
West Palm Beach, FL | September 2009 | 93 | |||||
Commercial |
||||||||
Colonial Promenade Winter Haven |
Orlando, FL | December 2009 | 286,297 |
Additionally, the Company classifies real estate assets as held for sale only after the
Company has received approval by its internal investment committee, the Company has commenced an
active program to sell the assets, the Company does not intend to retain a continuing interest in
the property, and in the opinion of the Companys management, it is probable the assets will sell
within the next 12 months. As of March 31, 2010, the Company had classified four for-sale
developments as held for sale. These real estate assets are reflected in the accompanying
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet at $33.9 million as of March 31, 2010, which represents the
lower of depreciated cost or fair value less costs to sell. There is no mortgage debt associated
with these properties as of March 31, 2010.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company transferred one commercial
development and two for-sale developments from assets held for sale to assets held for
investment as the Company has decided it will hold this land for a longer term. In addition, the
Company reallocated the commercial portion of two mixed-use development sites from assets held for
sale to assets held for investment.
As of March 31, 2010, there were no operating properties classified as held for sale. The
operating results of properties (excluding condominium conversion properties not previously
operated) designated as held for sale or sold, are included in discontinued operations in the
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations for all periods presented. The reserves, if any,
to write down the carrying value of the real estate assets designated and classified as held for
sale are also included in discontinued operations (excluding condominium conversion properties not
previously operated). Additionally, any impairment losses on assets held for continuing use are
included in continuing operations.
Below is a summary of the operations of the properties classified as discontinued operations
during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(amounts in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Property revenues: |
||||||||
Base rent |
$ | (13 | ) | $ | 1,156 | |||
Tenant recoveries |
(15 | ) | 65 | |||||
Other revenue |
| 104 | ||||||
Total revenues |
(28 | ) | 1,325 | |||||
Property operating and administrative expenses |
4 | 645 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 139 | ||||||
Total expenses |
4 | 784 | ||||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations before net gain
on disposition of discontinued operations |
(32 | ) | 541 | |||||
Net (loss) gain on disposition of discontinued operations,
net of income taxes |
(35 | ) | 45 | |||||
Noncontrolling interest in CRLP from discontinued operations |
8 | (163 | ) | |||||
Noncontrolling interest to limited partners |
(5 | ) | 468 | |||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations attributable to
parent company |
$ | (64 | ) | $ | 891 | |||
12
Table of Contents
Note 6 For-Sale Activities
During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company, through CPSI, sold four
and 33 units, respectively, at its for-sale residential development properties, including six
condominium conversion units in 2009.
The following is a summary of revenues and costs of condominium conversion and for-sale
residential activities (including activities in continuing and discontinued operations) for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(amounts in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Condominium conversion revenues, net |
$ | | $ | 327 | ||||
Condominium conversion costs |
| (259 | ) | |||||
Gains on condominium conversion sales, before income taxes |
| 68 | ||||||
For-sale residential revenues, net |
1,508 | 19,234 | ||||||
For-sale residential costs |
(1,531 | ) | (19,255 | ) | ||||
Losses on for-sale residential sales, before income taxes |
(23 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||
Provision for income taxes |
| (26 | ) | |||||
(Loss) gain on condominium conversions and for-sale
residential sales,
net of income taxes |
$ | (23 | ) | $ | 21 | |||
The net gains on condominium conversion sales are classified in discontinued operations
if the related condominium property was previously operated by the Company as an apartment
community. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, net gains on condominium conversion sales of
approximately $42,000 are included in discontinued operations. As of December 31, 2009, the Company
had sold all remaining condominium conversion properties.
For cash flow statement purposes, the Company classifies capital expenditures for newly
developed for-sale residential communities and for other condominium conversion communities in
investing activities. Likewise, the proceeds from the sales of condominium units and other
residential sales are also included in investing activities.
Note 7 Undeveloped Land and Construction in Progress
The Company currently has two active development projects, as outlined in the table below. In
2009, the Company decided to postpone development activities associated with the projects listed
under Future Developments in the table below until it determines that the current economic
environment has sufficiently improved.
13
Table of Contents
Costs | ||||||||||
Total Units/ | Capitalized | |||||||||
Square Feet (1) | to Date | |||||||||
Location | (unaudited) | (in thousands) | ||||||||
Active Developments: |
||||||||||
Commercial Projects: |
||||||||||
Colonial Promenade Craft Farms |
Gulf Shores, AL | 68 | $ | 8,003 | ||||||
Colonial Promenade Nord du Lac
(Phase I) (2) |
Covington, LA | 174 | 7,282 | |||||||
242 | $ | 15,285 | ||||||||
Future Developments: |
||||||||||
Multifamily Projects: |
||||||||||
Colonial Grand at Sweetwater |
Phoenix, AZ | 195 | 7,246 | |||||||
Colonial Grand at Thunderbird |
Phoenix, AZ | 244 | 8,312 | |||||||
Colonial Grand at Randal Park (3) |
Orlando, FL | 750 | 19,200 | |||||||
Colonial Grand at Hampton Preserve |
Tampa, FL | 486 | 14,998 | |||||||
Colonial Grand at South End |
Charlotte, NC | 353 | 12,044 | |||||||
Colonial Grand at Azure |
Las Vegas, NV | 188 | 7,804 | |||||||
Colonial Grand at Cityway |
Austin, TX | 320 | 4,951 | |||||||
2,536 | $ | 74,555 | ||||||||
Commercial Projects: |
||||||||||
Colonial Promenade Huntsville |
Huntsville, AL | 111 | 9,713 | |||||||
Colonial Promenade Nord du Lac (2) |
Covington, LA | | 33,049 | |||||||
111 | $ | 42,762 | ||||||||
Other Projects and Undeveloped Land |
||||||||||
Multifamily |
3,593 | |||||||||
Commercial |
69,472 | |||||||||
For-Sale Residential Land (4) |
70,342 | |||||||||
$ | 143,407 | |||||||||
Consolidated Construction in Progress |
$ | 276,009 | ||||||||
(1) | Square footage is presented in thousands. Square footage for the retail assets excludes anchor-owned square footage. | |
(2) | Costs capitalized to date for this development, including costs for Phase I, are presented net of an aggregate of $25.8 million of non-cash impairment charges recorded during 2009 and 2008. | |
(3) | This project is part of a mixed-use development. The Company is still evaluating plans for a multifamily apartment community. Therefore, costs attributable to this phase of development are subject to change. | |
(4) | These costs are presented net of a $24.6 million non-cash impairment charge recorded on two of the projects in 2009, 2008 and 2007. |
Interest capitalized on construction in progress during the three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009 was $0.4 million and $2.2 million, respectively.
14
Table of Contents
Note 8 Net (Loss) Income Per Share
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, a reconciliation of the numerator and
denominator used in the basic and diluted income from continuing operations per common share is as
follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||
(amounts in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||
Net (loss) income attributable to parent company |
$ | (10,295 | ) | $ | 15,953 | |||
Less: |
||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(2,034 | ) | (2,073 | ) | ||||
Income from discontinued operations |
64 | (891 | ) | |||||
Income allocated to participating securities |
(98 | ) | (106 | ) | ||||
Preferred share issuance costs write-off, net
of discount |
| (5 | ) | |||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations
available to
common shareholders |
$ | (12,363 | ) | $ | 12,878 | |||
Denominator: |
||||||||
Denominator for basic net income per share -
weighted average common shares |
66,426 | 48,202 | ||||||
Effect of dilutive securities |
| | ||||||
Denominator for diluted net income per share -
adjusted
weighted average common shares |
66,426 | 48,202 | ||||||
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company reported a net loss from
continuing operations, and as such, 17,481 dilutive share equivalents have been excluded from the
computation of diluted net income per share because including such shares would be anti-dilutive.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, 1,373,754 outstanding share options were excluded from
the computation of diluted net income per share because the grant date prices were greater than the
average market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive.
Note 9 Equity
The following table presents the changes in the issued common shares of beneficial interest
since December 31, 2009 (but excluding 8,151,740 and 8,162,845 units of CRLP at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively, which are redeemable for either cash equal to the fair market
value of a common share at the time of redemption or, at the option of the Company, one common
share):
Issued at December 31, 2009 (1) |
71,989,227 | |||
Common shares issued through dividend reinvestments |
22,048 | |||
Restricted shares issued (cancelled), net |
397,281 | |||
Shares issued under at-the-market equity offering program |
2,499,518 | |||
Redemption of CRLP units for common shares |
11,105 | |||
Issuances under other employee and nonemployee share plans |
13,692 | |||
Issued at March 31, 2010 (1) |
74,932,871 | |||
(1) | Includes 5,623,150 treasury shares. |
At-the-Market Equity Offering Program
On February 22, 2010, the Trusts Board of Trustees approved the issuance of up to $50.0
million of the Companys common shares under an at-the-market equity offering program. On
March 4, 2010, the Company and CRLP entered into separate Equity Distribution Agreements with each
of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC (each an
Agent, and together the Agents), respectively, pursuant to which the Company may sell from
time to time, in an at-the-market equity offering program under its Registration Statement
on Form S-3 (File No. 333-158081), up to $50.0 million in aggregate offering price of its common
shares. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company issued 2,499,518 common shares
at a weighted average issue price of $13.25 per share generating net proceeds of approximately
$32.4 million. The Company used these proceeds to repay a portion of the outstanding balance under
its unsecured credit facility and for general corporate purposes.
15
Table of Contents
Repurchases of Series D Preferred Depositary Shares
In October 2008, the Companys Board of Trustees authorized a repurchase program which allowed
the Company to repurchase up to an additional $25.0 million of its outstanding 8 1/8% Series D
preferred depositary shares over a 12 month period. The Board of Trustees of the Company, as
general partner of CRLP, also authorized the repurchase of a corresponding amount of Series D
Preferred Units of CRLP. During 2009, the Company repurchased 6,515 shares of its outstanding 8
1/8% Series D preferred depositary shares (and CRLP repurchased a corresponding amount of Series D
Preferred Units) in open market transactions for a purchase price of $126,761, or $19.46 per
depositary share. The Company received a 22.2% discount on the repurchase to the liquidation
preference price of $25.00 per depositary share and wrote off a nominal amount of issuance costs.
In the aggregate, the Company repurchased $24.1 million of its outstanding 8 1/8% Series D
preferred depositary shares (and CRLP has repurchased a corresponding amount of Series D Preferred
Units) under this program, which expired in late October 2009.
On January 27, 2010, the Trusts Board of Trustees authorized a new preferred securities
repurchase program which allows the Trust to repurchase up to $25 million of outstanding 8 1/8
percent Series D preferred depositary shares. The preferred shares may be repurchased from time to
time over the next 12 months in open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, subject
to applicable legal requirements, market conditions and other factors. This repurchase program does
not obligate the Trust to repurchase any specific amounts of preferred shares, and repurchases
pursuant to the program may be suspended or resumed at any time from time to time without further
notice or announcement. The Trust will continue to monitor the equity markets and repurchase
certain preferred shares that meet the Trusts required criteria, as funds are available. The
Trust did not repurchase any 8 1/8% Series D preferred depositary shares during the first quarter
of 2010.
Note 10 Segment Information
The Company currently manages its business based on the performance of two operating segments:
multifamily and commercial. The multifamily and commercial segments have separate management
teams that are responsible for acquiring, developing, managing and leasing properties within each
respective segment. The multifamily management team is responsible for all aspects of for-sale
developments, including disposition activities. The multifamily segment includes the operations
and assets of the for-sale developments due to the insignificance of these operations in the
periods presented. Commercial management is responsible for all aspects of the Companys
commercial property operations, including the management and leasing services for 45 commercial
properties, as well as third-party management services for commercial properties in which the
Company does not have an ownership interest and for brokerage services in other commercial property
transactions.
The pro-rata portion of the revenues, net operating income (NOI), and assets of the
partially-owned unconsolidated entities in which the Company has an interest are included in the
applicable segment information. Additionally, the revenues and NOI of properties sold that are
classified as discontinued operations are also included in the applicable segment information. In
reconciling the segment information presented below to total revenues, income from continuing
operations, and total assets, investments in partially-owned unconsolidated entities are eliminated
as equity investments and their related activity are reflected in the consolidated financial
statements as investments accounted for under the equity method, and discontinued operations are
reported separately. Management evaluates the performance of its multifamily and commercial
segments and allocates resources to them based on segment NOI. Segment NOI is defined as total
property revenues less total property operating expenses (such items as repairs and maintenance,
payroll, utilities, property taxes, insurance and advertising), and includes revenues/expenses from
unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Management evaluates the performance of its
for-sale residential business based on net gains / losses. Presented below is segment information,
for the multifamily and commercial segments, including the reconciliation of total segment revenues
to total revenues and total segment NOI to income from continuing operations before noncontrolling
interest for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, and total segment assets to total
assets as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
16
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||
Segment Revenues: |
||||||||
Multifamily |
$ | 75,877 | $ | 77,141 | ||||
Commercial |
20,991 | 23,474 | ||||||
Total Segment Revenues |
96,868 | 100,615 | ||||||
Partially-owned unconsolidated entities -
Multifamily |
(943 | ) | (2,001 | ) | ||||
Partially-owned unconsolidated entities -
Commercial |
(8,138 | ) | (16,484 | ) | ||||
Construction revenues |
| 35 | ||||||
Other non-property related revenue |
2,898 | 3,455 | ||||||
Discontinued operations property revenues |
28 | (1,325 | ) | |||||
Total Consolidated Revenues |
90,713 | 84,295 | ||||||
NOI: |
||||||||
Segment NOI: |
||||||||
Multifamily |
42,678 | 44,584 | ||||||
Commercial |
14,649 | 15,059 | ||||||
Total Segment NOI |
57,327 | 59,643 | ||||||
Partially-owned unconsolidated entities -
Multifamily |
(459 | ) | (1,033 | ) | ||||
Partially-owned unconsolidated entities -
Commercial |
(5,563 | ) | (10,569 | ) | ||||
Unallocated corporate revenues |
2,898 | 3,455 | ||||||
Discontinued operations property NOI |
32 | (681 | ) | |||||
Construction NOI |
| 1 | ||||||
Property management expenses |
(1,807 | ) | (1,918 | ) | ||||
General and administrative expenses |
(4,807 | ) | (4,382 | ) | ||||
Management fee and other expenses |
(2,673 | ) | (4,217 | ) | ||||
Restructuring charges |
| (812 | ) | |||||
Investment and development (1) |
(3 | ) | (165 | ) | ||||
Depreciation |
(30,279 | ) | (27,785 | ) | ||||
Amortization |
(2,224 | ) | (873 | ) | ||||
Impairment and other losses (2) |
(783 | ) | (1,054 | ) | ||||
Income from operations |
11,659 | 9,610 | ||||||
Total other income (expense), net (3) |
(21,651 | ) | 10,642 | |||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
$ | (9,992 | ) | $ | 20,252 | |||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
(in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Segment Assets |
||||||||
Multifamily |
$ | 2,482,764 | $ | 2,502,772 | ||||
Commercial |
534,118 | 538,046 | ||||||
Total Segment Assets |
3,016,882 | 3,040,818 | ||||||
Unallocated corporate assets (4) |
125,686 | 131,814 | ||||||
$ | 3,142,568 | $ | 3,172,632 | |||||
(1) | Reflects costs incurred related to potential mergers, acquisitions and abandoned pursuits. These costs are volatile and, therefore, may vary between periods. | |
(2) | For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company incurred casualty losses related to property damage at three of the Companys multifamily apartment communities. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company recorded a $1.0 million non-cash impairment charge. Of the charge, $0.7 million is related to the sale in April 2009 of our noncontrolling interest in the Colonial Pinnacle Craft Farms I joint venture and $0.3 million is related to the sale in March 2009 of the remaining 17 units at the Regents Park for-sale residential project. | |
(3) | For-sale residential activities, including net gain on sales and income tax expense (benefit), are included in the line item Total other income (expense) (see Note 6 related to for-sale activities). | |
(4) | Includes the Companys investment in partially-owned entities of $15,693 as of March 31, 2010 and $17,422 as of December 31, 2009. |
17
Table of Contents
Note 11 Investment in Partially-Owned Entities
Investments in Consolidated Partially-Owned Entities
The Company has one partially-owned investment, the CMS/Colonial Canyon Creek joint
venture, which is consolidated in its financial statements. As a result of a preferred equity
contribution of $11.5 million made by the Company to the joint venture in September 2009 in
connection with a construction loan refinancing, the Company began consolidating the CMS/Colonial
Canyon Creek joint venture in its financial statements beginning with the third quarter of 2009.
Investments in Unconsolidated Partially-Owned Entities
The Company accounts for the following investments in unconsolidated partially-owned
entities using the equity method. The following table summarizes the investments in
partially-owned entities as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Percent | March 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||
Owned | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Multifamily: |
||||||||||||
Belterra, Ft. Worth, TX |
10.00 | % | $ | 500 | $ | 525 | ||||||
Regents Park (Phase II), Atlanta, GA |
40.00 | %(1) | 3,382 | 3,387 | ||||||||
CG at Huntcliff, Atlanta, GA |
20.00 | % | 1,603 | 1,646 | ||||||||
CG at McKinney, Dallas, TX |
25.00 | %(1) | 1,721 | 1,721 | ||||||||
CG at Research Park, Raleigh, NC |
20.00 | % | 891 | 914 | ||||||||
DRA CV at Cary, Raleigh, NC |
20.00 | % | 1,398 | 1,440 | ||||||||
DRA The Grove at Riverchase, Birmingham, AL |
20.00 | % | 1,102 | 1,133 | ||||||||
Total Multifamily |
$ | 10,597 | $ | 10,766 | ||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||
600 Building Partnership, Birmingham, AL |
33.33 | % | 169 | 154 | ||||||||
Colonial
Promenade Alabaster II/Tutwiler II, Birmingham, AL |
5.00 | %(2) | (54 | ) | (190 | ) | ||||||
Colonial Promenade Madison, Huntsville, AL |
25.00 | % | 2,108 | 2,119 | ||||||||
Colonial Promenade Smyrna, Smyrna, TN |
50.00 | % | 2,188 | 2,174 | ||||||||
DRA / CLP JV |
15.00 | %(3) | (16,161 | ) | (15,321 | ) | ||||||
Highway 150, LLC, Birmingham, AL |
10.00 | % | 53 | 59 | ||||||||
Bluerock, Huntsville , AL |
10.00 | %(4) | (4,846 | ) | (4,617 | ) | ||||||
Parkside Drive LLC I, Knoxville, TN |
50.00 | % | 2,777 | 3,073 | ||||||||
Parkside Drive LLC II, Knoxville, TN |
50.00 | % | 7,227 | 7,210 | ||||||||
Parkway Place Limited Partnership, Huntsville, AL |
50.00 | % | 9,852 | 10,168 | ||||||||
Total Commercial |
$ | 3,313 | $ | 4,829 | ||||||||
Other: |
||||||||||||
Colonial /
Polar-BEK Management Company, Birmingham, AL |
50.00 | % | 17 | 35 | ||||||||
Heathrow, Orlando, FL |
50.00 | %(1) | 1,766 | 1,792 | ||||||||
$ | 1,783 | $ | 1,827 | |||||||||
$ | 15,693 | $ | 17,422 | |||||||||
(1) | These joint ventures consist of undeveloped land. | |
(2) | Equity investment includes the Companys investment of approximately $274,000, offset by the excess basis difference on the transaction of approximately $328,000, which is being amortized over the life of the properties. | |
(3) | As of March 31, 2010, this joint venture included 16 office properties and 2 retail properties located in Birmingham, Alabama; Orlando and Tampa, Florida; Atlanta, Georgia; Charlotte, North Carolina and Austin, Texas. Equity investment includes the value of the Companys investment of approximately $16.2 million, offset by the excess basis difference on the June 2007 joint venture transaction of approximately $32.3 million, which is being amortized over the life of the properties. | |
(4) | Equity investment includes the Companys investment of approximately $2.4 million, offset by the excess basis difference on the transaction of approximately $7.2 million, which is being amortized over the life of the properties. |
18
Table of Contents
Combined financial information for the Companys investments in unconsolidated
partially-owned entities since the date of the Companys acquisitions is as follows:
As of March 31, | As of December 31, | |||||||
(in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Balance Sheet |
||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Land, building, & equipment, net |
$ | 1,403,352 | $ | 1,416,526 | ||||
Construction in progress |
19,621 | 19,695 | ||||||
Other assets |
112,028 | 118,095 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,535,001 | $ | 1,554,316 | ||||
Liabilities and Partners Equity |
||||||||
Notes payable (1) |
$ | 1,210,337 | $ | 1,211,927 | ||||
Other liabilities |
104,698 | 108,277 | ||||||
Partners Equity |
219,966 | 234,112 | ||||||
Total liabilities and
partners capital |
$ | 1,535,001 | $ | 1,554,316 | ||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Statement of Operations |
||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 46,305 | $ | 107,195 | ||||
Operating expenses |
(16,263 | ) | (40,679 | ) | ||||
Interest expense |
(17,627 | ) | (38,913 | ) | ||||
Depreciation, amortization and other |
(19,690 | ) | (39,972 | ) | ||||
Net loss (2) |
$ | (7,275 | ) | $ | (12,369 | ) | ||
(1) | The Companys pro-rata share of indebtedness, as calculated based on ownership percentage, at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is $238.4 million and $239.1 million, respectively. | |
(2) | In addition to the Companys pro-rata share of income (loss) from partially-owned unconsolidated entities, Income (loss) from partially-owned investments of $0.3 million and ($0.7) million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, includes gains on the Companys dispositions of joint-venture interests and amortization of basis differences which are not reflected in the table above. |
Investments in Variable Interest Entities
The Company evaluates all transactions and relationships with variable interest entities
(VIEs) to determine whether the Company is the primary beneficiary.
Based on the Companys evaluation, as of March 31, 2010, the Company does not have a
controlling interest in, nor is the Company the primary beneficiary of any VIEs for which there is
a significant variable interest except for, as discussed above Investments in Consolidated
Partially-Owned Entities, CMS/Colonial Canyon Creek, which the Company began consolidating in
September 2009, as discussed above in Investments in Consolidated Partially-Owned Entities.
Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities
As of March 31, 2010, the Company has an interest in one VIE with significant variable
interests for which the Company is not the primary beneficiary.
With respect to the Colonial Grand at Traditions joint venture, the Company and its joint
venture partner each committed to a partial loan repayment guarantee of $3.5 million of the
principal amount of a $34.1 million construction loan obtained by the joint venture, for a total
guarantee of $7.0 million of the principal amount. The Company and its joint venture partner each
committed to provide 50% of the guarantee, which is different from the relative voting and economic
interests of the parties in the joint venture. As a result, this investment qualifies as a VIE,
but the Company has determined that it would not absorb a majority of the expected losses for this
joint venture and, therefore, does not consolidate the joint venture. In September 2009, the
Company determined that it was probable that it would have to fund its partial loan repayment
guarantee provided on the original construction loan and recognized a $3.5 million charge to
earnings. In addition, the Company determined that its 35% noncontrolling joint venture interest
was impaired and that this impairment was other than temporary. As a result, the Company wrote-off
its entire investment in the joint venture by recording a non-cash impairment charge of $0.2
million during the quarter ended September 30, 2009. The construction loan matured on April 15,
2010, but has not been repaid by the joint venture (see Note 12 - Unconsolidated Joint Venture
Financing Activity).
19
Table of Contents
Note 12 Financing Activities
During 2009, the Company obtained the following secured financing from Fannie Mae:
| In the first quarter of 2009, the Company closed on a $350.0 million collateralized credit facility (collateralized with 19 of CRLPs multifamily apartment communities totaling 6,565 units). Of the $350.0 million, $259.0 million bears interest at a fixed interest rate equal to 6.07% and $91.0 million bears interest at a fixed interest rate of 5.96%. The weighted average interest rate for this credit facility is 6.04%, and it matures on March 1, 2019; and |
| In the second quarter of 2009, the Company closed on a $156.4 million collateralized credit facility (collateralized by eight of CRLPs multifamily apartment communities totaling 2,816 units). Of the $156.4 million, $145.2 million bears interest at a fixed interest rate equal to 5.27% and $11.2 million bears interest at a fixed interest rate of 5.57%. The weighted average interest rate for this credit facility is 5.31%, and it matures on June 1, 2019. |
Under both facilities, accrued interest is required to be paid monthly with no scheduled principal
payments required prior to the maturity date. The proceeds from these financings were used to
repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings under the Companys unsecured credit facility.
As of March 31, 2010, CRLP, with the Company as guarantor, had a $675.0 million unsecured
credit facility (as amended, the Credit Facility) with Wachovia Bank, National Association
(Wachovia), as Agent for the lenders, Bank of America, N.A. as Syndication Agent, Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association, Citicorp North America, Inc. and Regions Bank, as Co-Documentation
Agents, and U.S. Bank National Association and PNC Bank, National Association, as Co-Senior
Managing Agents and other lenders named therein. The Credit Facility has a maturity date of
June 21, 2012. In
addition to the Credit Facility, the Company has a $35.0 million cash management line
provided by Wachovia that will expire on June 21, 2012. The cash management line had an
outstanding balance of $7.6 million as of March 31, 2010.
Base rate loans and revolving loans are available under the Credit Facility. The Credit
Facility also includes a competitive bid feature that allows the Company to convert up to $337.5
million under the Credit Facility to a fixed rate and for a fixed term not to exceed 90 days.
Generally, base rate loans bear interest at Wachovias designated base rate, plus a base rate
margin ranging up to 0.25% based on the Companys unsecured debt ratings from time to time.
Revolving loans bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 0.325% to 1.05% based on the
Companys unsecured debt ratings. Competitive bid loans bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin,
as specified by the participating lenders. Based on CRLPs current unsecured debt rating, the
revolving loans currently bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 105 basis points.
The Credit Facility and the cash management line, which are primarily used by the Company to
finance property acquisitions and developments and more recently to also fund repurchases of CRLP
senior notes and Series D preferred depositary shares, had an outstanding balance at March 31, 2010
of $312.6 million. The interest rate of the Credit Facility (including the cash management line)
was 1.29% and 1.26% at March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The Credit Facility contains various restrictions, representations, covenants and events of
default that could preclude future borrowings (including future issuances of letters of credit) or
trigger early repayment obligations, including, but not limited to the following: nonpayment;
violation or breach of certain covenants; failure to perform certain covenants beyond a cure
period; failure to satisfy certain financial ratios; a material adverse change in the consolidated
financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects of the Company; and generally not
paying the Companys debts as they become due. At March 31, 2010, the Company was in compliance
with these covenants. However, given the recent downturn in the economy and continued uncertainty
in the stock and credit markets, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to
maintain compliance with these ratios and other debt covenants in the future.
20
Table of Contents
Many of the recent disruptions in the financial markets have been brought about in large part
by failures in the U.S. banking system. If Wachovia or any of the other financial institutions that
have extended credit commitments to the Company under the Credit Facility or otherwise are
adversely affected by the conditions of the financial markets, these financial institutions may
become unable to fund borrowings under credit commitments to the Company under the Credit Facility,
the cash management line or otherwise. If these lenders become unable to fund the Companys
borrowings pursuant to the financial institutions commitments, the Company may need to obtain
replacement financing, and such financing, if available, may not be available on commercially
attractive terms.
Unsecured Senior Notes Repurchases
During 2009, the Company repurchased an aggregate of $181.0 million of outstanding unsecured
senior notes of CRLP in separate transactions. In addition, during 2009, the Company completed two
separate cash tender offers for outstanding unsecured senior notes of CRLP. In April 2009, the
Company completed a cash tender offer for $250 million in aggregate principal amount of outstanding
notes maturing in 2010 and 2011, and in September 2009, the Company completed an additional cash
tender offer for $148.2 million in aggregate principal amount of outstanding notes maturing in
2014, 2015 and 2016. As a result, during 2009, the Company repurchased an aggregate of
$579.2 million of our outstanding unsecured senior notes at an aggregate average of 10.6% discount
to par value, which represents an 8.1% yield to maturity. As a result of the repurchases, during
2009, the Company recognized net gains of approximately $54.7 million, which is included in Gains
on retirement of debt on the Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive
Income (Loss).
Repurchases of the outstanding unsecured senior notes of CRLP during 2009 are as follows:
Yield-to- | ||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | Amount | Discount | Maturity | Net Gain (1) | ||||||||||||
1st Quarter |
$ | 96.9 | 27.1 | % | 12.64 | % | $ | 24.2 | ||||||||
2nd Quarter (2) |
315.5 | 5.9 | % | 6.75 | % | 16.2 | ||||||||||
3rd Quarter (3) |
166.8 | 10.0 | % | 7.87 | % | 14.3 | ||||||||||
4th Quarter |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 579.2 | 10.6 | % | 8.06 | % | $ | 54.7 |
(1) | Gains are presented net of the loss on hedging activities of $1.1 million recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and $0.6 million recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2009 as the result of a reclassification of amounts in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in connection with the conclusion that it is probable that the Company will not make interest payments associated with previously hedged debt as a result of the repurchases under the senior note repurchase program. | |
(2) | Repurchases include $250.0 million repurchased pursuant to the Companys tender offer that closed on May 4, 2009, which was conducted outside of the senior note repurchase program. | |
(3) | Repurchases include $148.2 million repurchased pursuant to the Companys tender offer that closed on August 31, 2009, which was conducted outside of the senior note repurchase program. |
On January 27, 2010, the Trusts Board of Trustees authorized a new unsecured notes
repurchase program which allows the Company to repurchase up to $100 million of outstanding
unsecured senior notes of CRLP. This new repurchase program runs through December 31, 2010. Under
this program, senior notes may be repurchased from time to time in open market transactions or
privately negotiated transactions, subject to applicable legal requirements, market conditions and
other factors. The repurchase program does not obligate the repurchase of any specific amounts of
senior notes, and repurchases pursuant to the program may be suspended or resumed at any time from
time to time without further notice or announcement. The Company will continue to monitor the debt
markets and repurchase certain senior notes that meet the Companys required criteria, as funds are
available. The Company anticipates funding potential repurchases from borrowings under its existing
credit facility, proceeds from property sales and/or other available funds.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company repurchased $8.7 million in
unsecured senior notes, at a 1.0% discount to par value, which represents a 6.51% yield to maturity
and resulted in the recognition of negligible net gains.
21
Table of Contents
Unconsolidated Joint Venture Financing Activity
During April 2007, the Company and its joint venture partner each committed to guarantee up to
$3.5 million, for an aggregate of up to $7.0 million, of a $34.1 million construction loan obtained
by the Colonial Grand at Traditions joint venture.
Construction at this site is complete as the project was placed into service during 2008. On
September 25, 2009, the Company determined it was probable that it would have to fund the partial
loan repayment guarantee provided on the original construction loan. Accordingly, on September 30,
2009, $3.5 million was recorded for the guarantee. As of March 31, 2010, the joint venture had
drawn $33.4 million on the construction loan, which matured by its terms on April 15, 2010. The
estimated fair market value of the property in the joint venture is significantly less than the
principal amount outstanding on this loan. To date, the joint venture has not repaid the
outstanding principal amount due on the construction loan. The joint venture, including the Company
and its joint venture partner, and the lender have engaged in discussions in an attempt to reach a
mutually acceptable arrangement with respect to the outstanding loan. However, the parties have
been unsuccessful in negotiating a mutually acceptable arrangement with respect to the outstanding
loan. The lender has made a demand on the joint venture for the outstanding balance under the
loan. The lender has also made a demand on the Company for the $3.5 million guarantee payment,
together with outstanding interest on the loan (which as of April 16, 2010 was approximately $0.05
million). No assurance can be given that the joint venture or the Company will be able to reach a
mutually satisfactory resolution of this dispute with the lender.
As of March 31, 2010, the Colonial Promenade Smyrna joint venture had $28.2 million
outstanding on the construction loan, which matured by its terms in December 2009. The Company has
guaranteed up to $8.65 million (currently $4.3 million) of this loan (see Note 14). The joint
venture is currently in negotiations with the lender regarding its options (see Note 15).
There can be no assurance that the Companys joint ventures will be successful in refinancing
and/or replacing existing debt at maturity or otherwise. If the joint ventures are unable to
obtain additional financing, payoff the existing loans that are maturing, or renegotiate suitable
terms with the existing lenders, the lenders generally would have the right to foreclose on the
properties in question and, accordingly, the joint ventures will lose their interests in the
assets. The failure to refinance and/or replace such debt and other factors with respect to the
Companys joint venture interests (discussed in the Item 1A: Risk Factors in the Companys 2009
Annual Report on Form 10-K) may materially adversely impact the value of the Companys joint
venture interests, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial
condition and results of operations.
Note 13 Derivatives and Hedging
The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic
conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and
operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic
risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount,
sources, and duration of its debt funding and the use of derivative financial instruments.
Specifically, the Company enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that
arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain
cash amounts, the value of which is determined by interest rates. The Companys derivative
financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the
Companys known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments principally
related to the Companys investments and borrowings.
The Companys objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest
expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the
Company primarily uses interest rate swaps and caps as part of its interest rate risk management
strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate
amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of
the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. Interest rate caps designated
as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty if interest
rates rise above the strike rate on the contract in exchange for an upfront premium.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and that
qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss on the
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period
that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The Company did not have any active cash
flow hedges during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
22
Table of Contents
At March 31, 2010, the Company had $2.8 million in Accumulated other comprehensive loss
related to settled or terminated derivatives. Amounts reported in Accumulated other comprehensive
loss related to derivatives will be reclassified to Interest expense as interest payments are
made on the Companys variable-rate debt or to Loss on hedging activities at such time that the
interest payments on the hedged debt become probable of not occurring as a result of the
Companys senior note repurchase program. The changes in Accumulated other comprehensive
loss for reclassifications to Interest expense tied to interest payments on the hedged debt were
$0.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. The Company did not reclassify
amounts to Loss on hedging activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010. For the three
months ended March 31, 2009, the change in Accumulated other comprehensive loss for
reclassification to Loss on hedging activities related to interest payments on the hedged debt
that have been deemed probable not to occur as a result of the Companys prior senior note
repurchase program was $1.1 million.
Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage the Companys
exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the strict hedge
accounting requirements. As of March 31, 2010, the Company had no derivatives that were not
designated as a hedge in a qualifying hedging relationship.
Note
14 Contingencies and Guarantees
Contingencies
The Company is involved in a contract dispute with a general contractor in connection with
construction costs and cost overruns with respect to certain of its for-sale projects, which were
developed in a joint venture in which the Company is a majority owner. The contractor is affiliated
with the Companys joint venture partner.
| In connection with the dispute, in January 2008, the contractor filed a lawsuit against the Company alleging, among other things, breach of contract, enforcement of a lien against real property, misrepresentation, conversion, declaratory judgment and an accounting of costs, and is seeking $10.3 million in damages, plus consequential and punitive damages. |
| Certain of the subcontractors, vendors and other parties, involved in the projects, including purchasers of units, have also made claims in the form of lien claims, general claims or lawsuits. The Company has been sued by purchasers of certain condominium units alleging breach of contract, fraud, construction deficiencies and misleading sales practices. Both compensatory and punitive damages are sought in these actions. Some of these claims have been resolved by negotiations and mediations, and others may also be similarly resolved. Some of these claims will likely be arbitrated or litigated to conclusion. |
The Company is continuing to evaluate its options and investigate certain of these claims,
including possible claims against the contractor and other parties. The Company intends to
vigorously defend itself against these claims. However, no prediction of the likelihood, or
amount, of any resulting loss or recovery can be made at this time and no assurance can be given
that the matter will be resolved favorably.
In connection with certain retail developments, the Company has received funding from
municipalities for infrastructure costs. In most cases, the municipalities issue bonds that are
repaid primarily from sales tax revenues generated from the tenants at each respective development.
The Company has guaranteed the shortfall, if any, of tax revenues to the debt service requirements
on the bonds. The total amount outstanding on these bonds is approximately $13.5 million at March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, no liability was recorded
for these guarantees.
As a result of transactions executed in 2007, the Company implemented its strategic initiative
to become a multifamily focused REIT, which included two significant joint venture transactions
whereby the majority of the Companys wholly-owned commercial properties were transferred into
separate joint ventures. In December 2009, the Company disposed of its interest in one of these
joint ventures but continues to retain its interest in the other joint venture. In connection with
the 2007 joint venture transactions, the Company assumed certain contingent obligations for a total
of $15.7 million, of which $6.1 million remains outstanding as of March 31, 2010.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company is self insured up to $0.8 million, $1.0 million and $1.8
million for general liability, workers compensation and property insurance, respectively. The
Company is also self insured for health insurance and responsible for amounts up to $135,000 per
claim and up to $2.0 million per person.
The Company is a party to various other legal proceedings incidental to its business. In the
opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, the ultimate liability, if any, with
respect to those proceedings is not presently expected to materially affect the financial position
or results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
23
Table of Contents
Guarantees and Other Arrangements
With respect to the Colonial Grand at Traditions joint venture, the Company and its joint
venture partner each committed to guarantee $3.5 million, for a total of $7.0 million, of a $34.1
million construction loan obtained by the joint venture. As of March 31, 2010, the joint venture
had drawn $33.4 million on the construction loan, which matured by its terms on April 15, 2010 (see
Note 12).
During November 2006, the Company and its joint venture partner each committed to guarantee up
to $8.65 million, for an aggregate of up to $17.3 million, of a $34.6 million construction loan
obtained by the Colonial Promenade Smyrna joint venture. The Company and its joint venture partner
each committed to provide 50% of the $17.3 million guarantee, as each partner has a 50% ownership
interest in the joint venture. Construction at this site was completed in 2008. The guarantee
provided, among other things, for a reduction in the guarantee amount in the event the property
achieves and maintains a 1.15 debt service charge. Accordingly, the guarantee has been reduced to
$4.3 million. As of March 31, 2010, the Colonial Promenade Smyrna joint venture had $28.2 million
outstanding on the construction loan, which matured by its terms in December 2009. The joint
venture is currently in negotiations with the lender with respect to its options. At March 31,
2010, no liability was recorded for the guarantee (see Note 15).
In connection with the formation of Highway 150 LLC in 2002, the Company executed a guarantee,
pursuant to which the Company serves as a guarantor of $1.0 million of the debt related to the
joint venture, which is collateralized by the Colonial Promenade Hoover retail property. The
Companys maximum guarantee of $1.0 million may be requested by the lender only after all of the
rights and remedies available under the associated note and security agreements have been exercised
and exhausted. At March 31, 2010, the total amount of debt of the joint venture was approximately
$16.0 million and the debt matures in December 2012. At March 31, 2010, no liability was recorded
for the guarantee.
In connection with the contribution of certain assets to CRLP, certain partners of CRLP have
guaranteed indebtedness of the Company totaling $21.2 million at March 31, 2010. The guarantees
are held in order for the contributing partners to maintain their tax deferred status on the
contributed assets. These individuals have not been indemnified by the Company.
As discussed above, in connection with certain retail developments, the Company has received
funding from municipalities for infrastructure costs. In most cases, the municipalities issue
bonds that are repaid primarily from sales tax revenues generated from the tenants at each
respective development. The Company has guaranteed the shortfall, if any, of tax revenues to the
debt service requirements on the bonds.
The fair value of the above guarantees could change in the near term if the markets in which
these properties are located deteriorate or if there are other negative indicators.
Note 15 Subsequent Events
Financing Activity
On May 3, 2010, the Company acquired the outstanding Colonial Promenade Smyrna joint venture
construction note from the lender at par (see Note 14). This note, which had an original principal
amount of $34.6 million and matured by its terms in December 2009, had not been repaid and had an
outstanding balance of $28.3 million as of the date of purchase. The Company has agreed with its
joint venture partner to extend the maturity date of the note consistent with the original
extension terms of the note, which provided for an option to extend maturity for two additional
consecutive one year periods. Accordingly, the maturity date of the note has been extended to
December 2010 with an option to extend for one additional year. As a result of this transaction,
the Companys guarantee on this note has terminated, but the joint venture partners guarantee (as
discussed in Note 14) remains in place.
Distribution
On April 28, 2010, a cash distribution was declared to shareholders of the Trust and partners
of CRLP in the amount of $0.15 per common share and per unit, totaling approximately $11.6 million.
The distribution was declared to shareholders and partners of record as of May 10, 2010 and will
be paid on May 17, 2010.
24
Table of Contents
COLONIAL REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except unit data)
(audited) | ||||||||
March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Land, buildings, & equipment |
$ | 3,211,959 | $ | 3,210,336 | ||||
Undeveloped land and construction in progress |
276,009 | 237,101 | ||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
(549,664 | ) | (519,715 | ) | ||||
Real estate assets held for sale, net |
33,950 | 65,022 | ||||||
Net real estate assets |
2,972,254 | 2,992,744 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
3,762 | 4,590 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
7,752 | 7,952 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
34,378 | 33,915 | ||||||
Notes receivable |
17,366 | 22,208 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
16,916 | 16,503 | ||||||
Deferred debt and lease costs |
21,687 | 22,560 | ||||||
Investment in partially-owned entities |
15,694 | 17,422 | ||||||
Other assets |
51,596 | 54,066 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,141,405 | $ | 3,171,960 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
Notes and mortgages payable |
$ | 1,360,674 | $ | 1,393,797 | ||||
Unsecured credit facility |
312,632 | 310,546 | ||||||
Total debt |
1,673,306 | 1,704,343 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
25,007 | 27,626 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
17,809 | 13,133 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
18,528 | 26,142 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
6,212 | 8,805 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
1,740,862 | 1,780,049 | ||||||
Redeemable units, at redemption value - 8,151,740 and 8,162,845 units
outstanding at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
137,695 | 133,537 | ||||||
General partner - |
||||||||
Common
equity - 69,309,721 and 66,366,077 units outstanding at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
1,070,891 | 1,066,390 | ||||||
Preferred equity ($125,000 liquidation preference) |
96,550 | 96,550 | ||||||
Limited partners preferred equity ($100,000 liquidation preference) |
97,406 | 97,406 | ||||||
Limited partners nonconrolling interest in consolidated partnership |
844 | 985 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(2,843 | ) | (2,957 | ) | ||||
Total equity |
1,262,848 | 1,258,374 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 3,141,405 | $ | 3,171,960 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
25
Table of Contents
COLONIAL REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per unit data)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||
Minimum rent |
$ | 73,482 | $ | 70,239 | ||||
Tenant recoveries |
2,789 | 1,066 | ||||||
Other property related revenue |
11,544 | 9,500 | ||||||
Construction revenues |
| 35 | ||||||
Other non-property related revenue |
2,898 | 3,455 | ||||||
Total revenue |
90,713 | 84,295 | ||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||
Property operating expenses |
25,419 | 22,469 | ||||||
Taxes, licenses, and insurance |
11,059 | 10,976 | ||||||
Construction expenses |
| 34 | ||||||
Property management expenses |
1,807 | 1,918 | ||||||
General and administrative expenses |
4,807 | 4,382 | ||||||
Management fee and other expense |
2,673 | 4,217 | ||||||
Restructuring charges |
| 812 | ||||||
Investment and development |
3 | 165 | ||||||
Depreciation |
30,279 | 27,785 | ||||||
Amortization |
2,224 | 873 | ||||||
Impairment and other losses |
783 | 1,054 | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
79,054 | 74,685 | ||||||
Income from operations |
11,659 | 9,610 | ||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||
Interest expense |
(20,901 | ) | (20,432 | ) | ||||
Debt cost amortization |
(1,185 | ) | (1,303 | ) | ||||
Gains on retirement of debt |
28 | 25,319 | ||||||
Interest income |
393 | 301 | ||||||
Income (loss) from partially-owned unconsolidated entities |
270 | (650 | ) | |||||
Loss on hedging activities |
| (1,063 | ) | |||||
(Loss) gain from sales of property, net of income taxes of $0 (1Q10) and $3,177 (1Q09) |
(7 | ) | 5,380 | |||||
Income taxes and other |
(249 | ) | 3,090 | |||||
Total other income (expense) |
(21,651 | ) | 10,642 | |||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
(9,992 | ) | 20,252 | |||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
(32 | ) | 541 | |||||
(Loss) gain
on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes (benefit) of of $0 (1Q10) and $26 (1Q09) |
(35 | ) | 45 | |||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
(67 | ) | 586 | |||||
Net (loss) income |
(10,059 | ) | 20,838 | |||||
Noncontrolling interest of limited partners continuing operations |
82 | (1,009 | ) | |||||
Noncontrolling interest of limited partners discontinued operations |
(5 | ) | 468 | |||||
(Income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
77 | (541 | ) | |||||
Net (loss) income attributable to CRLP |
(9,982 | ) | 20,297 | |||||
Distributions to limited partner preferred unitholders |
(1,813 | ) | (1,813 | ) | ||||
Distributions to general partner preferred unitholders |
(2,034 | ) | (2,073 | ) | ||||
Preferred unit issuance costs write-off, net of discount |
| (5 | ) | |||||
Net (loss) income available to common unitholders |
$ | (13,829 | ) | $ | 16,406 | |||
Net (income) loss available to common unitholders allocated to limited partners-continuing operations |
1,492 | (2,368 | ) | |||||
Net (income) loss available to common unitholders allocated to limited partners -discontinued operations |
8 | (163 | ) | |||||
Net (loss) income available to common unitholders allocated to general partner |
$ | (12,329 | ) | $ | 13,875 | |||
Net (loss) income per common unit Basic: |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | (0.19 | ) | $ | 0.27 | |||
Income from discontinued operations |
| 0.02 | ||||||
Net (loss) income per common unit Basic |
$ | (0.19 | ) | $ | 0.29 | |||
Net (loss) income per common unit Diluted: |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | (0.19 | ) | $ | 0.27 | |||
Income from discontinued operations |
| 0.02 | ||||||
Net (loss) income per common unit Diluted |
$ | (0.19 | ) | $ | 0.29 | |||
Average units outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
74,582 | 57,025 | ||||||
Diluted |
74,582 | 57,025 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
26
Table of Contents
COLONIAL REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (10,059 | ) | $ | 20,838 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
32,632 | 29,296 | ||||||
(Income) loss from unconsolidated entities |
(270 | ) | 650 | |||||
(Losses) gains from sales of property |
42 | (8,537 | ) | |||||
Impairment and other losses |
783 | 1,054 | ||||||
Gain on retirement of debt |
(28 | ) | (25,319 | ) | ||||
Distributions of income from unconsolidated entities |
1,872 | 3,800 | ||||||
Other, net |
1,315 | 1,094 | ||||||
Decrease (increase) in: |
||||||||
Restricted cash |
200 | (1,652 | ) | |||||
Accounts receivable |
(463 | ) | 175 | |||||
Prepaid expenses |
(507 | ) | (7,190 | ) | ||||
Other assets |
739 | 3,832 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
1 | (13,540 | ) | |||||
Accrued interest |
4,676 | 2,830 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other |
(10,318 | ) | 10,367 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
20,615 | 17,698 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Acquisition of properties |
(225 | ) | | |||||
Development expenditures |
(6,127 | ) | (22,758 | ) | ||||
Tenant improvements and leasing commissions |
(361 | ) | | |||||
Capital expenditures |
(6,088 | ) | (2,759 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of property, net of selling costs |
1,327 | 32,805 | ||||||
Issuance of notes receivable |
(249 | ) | ||||||
Repayments of notes receivable |
4,842 | 55 | ||||||
Distributions from unconsolidated entities |
| | ||||||
Capital contributions to unconsolidated entities |
(7 | ) | (41 | ) | ||||
Sale of securities |
| 467 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
(6,639 | ) | 7,520 | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from additional borrowings |
| 350,000 | ||||||
Proceeds from dividend reinvestment plan and exercise of stock options |
386 | 109 | ||||||
Proceeds from common share issuance, net of expenses |
32,461 | | ||||||
Principal reductions of debt |
(33,224 | ) | (71,777 | ) | ||||
Payment of debt issuance costs |
| (4,126 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from borrowings on revolving credit lines |
240,000 | 210,000 | ||||||
Payments on revolving credit lines and overdrafts |
(239,342 | ) | (490,788 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid to common and preferred unitholders |
(13,862 | ) | (16,042 | ) | ||||
Distributions to noncontrolling partners in CRLP |
(1,223 | ) | (2,215 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(14,804 | ) | (24,839 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(828 | ) | 379 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
4,590 | 9,185 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 3,762 | $ | 9,564 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for interest, including amounts capitalized |
$ | 16,593 | $ | 19,844 | ||||
Cash (received) paid during the period for income taxes |
$ | (133 | ) | $ | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
27
Table of Contents
COLONIAL REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(amounts in thousands)
Limited | Limited | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Partner | Partners | Partners | Other | Redeemable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Preferred | Preferred | Noncontrolling | Comprehensive | Common | |||||||||||||||||||||||
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 | Equity | Equity | Equity | Interest | Income (Loss) | Total | Units | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
$ | 963,509 | $ | 96,707 | $ | 97,406 | $ | 1,943 | $ | (5,205 | ) | $ | 1,154,360 | $ | 124,848 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
13,880 | 2,073 | 1,813 | 541 | 18,307 | 2,531 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment for amounts included in net income |
1,206 | 1,206 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to common unitholders |
(12,152 | ) | (12,152 | ) | (2,215 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to preferred unitholders |
(2,073 | ) | (1,813 | ) | (3,886 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in interest of limited partners |
(995 | ) | (995 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contributions from partners and the Company related to
employee
employee stock purchase, dividend reinvestment plans |
270 | 270 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Redeemption of partnership units for shares |
31 | 31 | (31 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in redeembable noncontrolling interest |
7,168 | 7,168 | (7,168 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2009 |
$ | 972,706 | $ | 96,707 | $ | 97,406 | $ | 1,489 | $ | (3,999 | ) | $ | 1,164,309 | $ | 117,965 | |||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
$ | 1,066,390 | $ | 96,550 | $ | 97,406 | $ | 985 | $ | (2,957 | ) | $ | 1,258,374 | $ | 133,537 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
(12,329 | ) | 2,034 | 1,813 | (77 | ) | (8,559 | ) | (1,500 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment for amounts included in net income |
114 | 114 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to common unitholders |
(10,015 | ) | (10,015 | ) | (1,223 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to preferred unitholders |
(2,034 | ) | (1,813 | ) | (3,847 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in interest of limited partners |
(64 | ) | (64 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contributions from partners and the Company related to
employee
employee stock purchase, dividend reinvestment plans
and equity offerings |
33,726 | 33,726 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Redeemption of partnership units for shares |
131 | 131 | (131 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in redeembable noncontrolling interest |
(7,012 | ) | (7,012 | ) | 7,012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2010 |
$ | 1,070,891 | $ | 96,550 | $ | 97,406 | $ | 844 | $ | (2,843 | ) | $ | 1,262,848 | $ | 137,695 | |||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
28
Table of Contents
COLONIAL REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
The consolidated condensed financial statements of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership
have been prepared pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules and
regulations. The following notes, which represent interim disclosures as required by the SEC,
highlight significant changes to the notes included in the December 31, 2009 audited consolidated
financial statements of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership and should be read together with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Colonial Realty Limited
Partnerships 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Note 1 Organization and Business
Colonial Realty Limited Partnership (CRLP) is the operating partnership of Colonial
Properties Trust (the Trust), an Alabama real estate investment trust (REIT) whose shares are
traded on the New York Stock Exchange. The Trust was originally formed as a Maryland REIT on July
9, 1993 and reorganized as an Alabama REIT under a new Alabama REIT statute on August 21, 1995.
The Trust is a multifamily-focused self-administered and self-managed equity REIT, which means that
it is engaged in the acquisition, development, ownership, management and leasing of multifamily
apartment communities and other commercial real estate properties. The Trusts activities include
full or partial ownership and operation of a portfolio of 156 properties as of March 31, 2010,
consisting of multifamily and commercial properties located in Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia,
Nevada, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia. As of March 31, 2010,
including properties in lease-up, the Trust owns interests in 111 multifamily apartment communities
(including 105 consolidated properties, of which 104 are wholly-owned and one is partially-owned,
and six properties partially-owned through unconsolidated joint venture entities), and 45
commercial properties, consisting of 30 office properties (including four wholly-owned consolidated
properties and 26 properties partially-owned through unconsolidated joint venture entities) and 15
retail properties (including five wholly-owned consolidated properties and 10 properties
partially-owned through unconsolidated joint venture entities).
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Unaudited Interim Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated condensed financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for
interim financial information, including rules and regulations of the SEC. Accordingly, the interim
financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally
accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation
have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2010, are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.
Except for the impact from the adoption of new accounting pronouncements (see Note 2), the
consolidated condensed balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited
financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes
required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial
statements.
Federal Income Tax Status
CRLP is a partnership for federal income tax purposes. As a partnership CRLP is not subject to
federal income tax on its income. Instead, each of CRLPs partners, including the Trust, is
required to pay tax on such partners allocable share of income. The Trust has elected to be taxed
as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code, commencing with its short taxable year ending
December 31, 1993. A REIT generally is not subject to federal income tax on the income that it
distributes to shareholders provided that the REIT meets the applicable REIT distribution
requirements and other requirements for qualification as a REIT under the Code. The Trust believes
that it is organized and has operated and intends to continue to operate, in a manner to qualify
for taxation as a REIT under the Code. For each taxable year in which the Trust qualifies for
taxation as a REIT, the Trust generally will not be subject to federal corporate tax on its net
income that is distributed currently to its shareholders. While the Trust generally will not be
subject to corporate federal income tax on income that it distributes
currently to shareholders, it will be subject to federal income tax in certain circumstances
including: the Trust will be subject to income tax to the extent it distributes less than 100% of
its REIT taxable income (including capital gains); and, if the Trust acquires any assets from a
non-REIT C corporation in a carry-over basis transaction, the Trust would be liable for corporate
federal income tax, at the highest applicable corporate rate for the built-in gain with respect
to those assets if it disposed of those assets within 10 years after they were acquired. CRLP and
the REIT are subject to certain state and local taxes on income and property, including the
margin-based tax in Texas and franchise taxes in Tennessee and North Carolina.
29
Table of Contents
CRLPs consolidated financial statements include the operations of a taxable REIT subsidiary,
CPSI, which is not entitled to a dividends paid deduction and is subject to federal, state and
local income taxes. CPSI uses the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Deferred
income tax assets and liabilities result from temporary differences. Temporary differences are
differences between tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial
statements that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future periods. All inter-company
transactions are eliminated in the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements. CPSI
has an income tax receivable of $17.7 million and $17.8 million as of March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009, respectively, which is included in Accounts receivable, net on CRLPs Consolidated
Condensed Balance Sheet. CPSIs consolidated provision for income taxes was zero for
each of the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. CPSIs effective income tax rate was 0%
for each of the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
Tax years 2003 through 2009 are subject to examination by the federal taxing authorities.
Generally, tax years 2006 through 2008 are subject to examination by state taxing authorities.
There is one state tax examination currently in process.
On November 6, 2009, the Worker, Homeownership and Business Assistance Act of 2009 was signed
into law, which expands the net operating loss (NOL) carryback rules to allow businesses to
carryback NOLs incurred in either 2008 or 2009 up to five years. As a result of the new
legislation, CPSI is able to carryback tax losses that occurred in the year ending December 31,
2009 against income that was recognized in 2005 and 2006. During the fourth quarter 2009, CPSI
recorded an income tax benefit as a result of the new NOL carryback rules. Refunds are anticipated
to be collected in 2010.
On February 17, 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Act) was
signed into law. Section 1231 of the Act allows some business taxpayers to elect to defer
cancellation of indebtedness income when the taxpayer repurchases applicable debt instruments after
December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2011. Under the Act, the cancellation of indebtedness
income in 2009 could be deferred for five years (until 2014), and the cancellation of indebtedness
income in 2010 could be deferred for four years (until 2014), subject in both cases to acceleration
events. After the deferral period, 20% of the cancellation of indebtedness income would be
included in taxpayers gross income in each of the next five taxable years. The deferral is an
irrevocable election made on the taxpayers income tax return for the taxable year of the
reacquisition. CRLP anticipates making this election with regard to a portion of the debt
repurchased in 2009.
CRLP may from time to time be assessed interest or penalties by major tax jurisdictions,
although any such assessments historically have been minimal and immaterial to CRLPs financial
results. When CRLP has received an assessment for interest and/or penalties, it has been
classified in the financial statements as income tax expense.
Notes Receivable
Notes receivable consists primarily of promissory notes representing loans by CRLP to third
parties. CRLP records notes receivable at cost. CRLP evaluates the collectability of both
interest and principal for each of its notes to determine whether they are impaired. A note is
considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that CRLP
will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the existing contractual terms. When a note
is considered to be impaired, the amount of the allowance is calculated by comparing the recorded
investment to either the value determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at the
notes effective interest rate or to the value of the collateral if the note is collateral
dependent.
As of March 31, 2010, CRLP had notes receivable of $19.2 million, consisting primarily of a
$16.9 million seller-financing note with a five year term at an interest rate of 5.6% associated
with the disposition of Colonial Promenade at Fultondale in February 2009. In November 2009, CRLP
disposed of a tract of land for $7.3 million, which included a $5.0 million seller-financing note
for a term of six months at an interest rate of 7.5%. The balance on this note was paid in full in
March 2010.
30
Table of Contents
CRLP had accrued interest related to its outstanding notes receivable of $0.1 million as of
March 31, 2010 and 2009. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, CRLP had recorded a reserve
of $1.9 million against its outstanding notes receivable and accrued interest. The weighted average
interest rate on the notes receivable outstanding at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was
approximately 5.6% and 6.0%, respectively. Interest income is recognized on an accrual basis.
Fair Value Measures
CRLP applies ASC 820-10 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, in relation to the
valuation of real estate assets recorded at fair value, to its impairment valuation analysis of
real estate assets (see Note 4) and to its disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments,
principally indebtedness (see Note 12) and notes receivable (see above). The disclosure of
estimated fair values was determined by management using available market information, considering
market participant assumptions and appropriate valuation methodologies available to management at
March 31, 2010. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated
fair value. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the estimates presented below, using Level
2 and 3 inputs, are indicative of the amounts CRLP could realize on disposition of the real estate
assets or financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation
methodologies could have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
The following table presents CRLPs real estate assets reported at fair market value and the
related level in the fair value hierarchy as defined by ASC 820 used to measure those assets,
liabilities and disclosures:
(in thousands) | Fair value measurements as of March 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Assets (Liabilities) | Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||
Real estate assets,
including land held for
sale |
$ | 31,451 | $ | | $ | | $ | 31,451 |
Real estate assets, including land held for sale were valued using sales activity for
similar assets, current contracts and other inputs management believes are consistent with those
that market participants would use.
At March 31, 2010, the estimated fair value of fixed rate debt was approximately $1.31 billion
(carrying value of $1.35 billion) and the estimated fair value of CRLPs variable rate debt,
including CRLPs unsecured credit facility, is consistent with the carrying value of $325.9
million.
The estimated fair value of CRLPs notes receivable at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009
was approximately $17.4 million and $22.2 million, respectively, based on market rates and similar
financing arrangements.
Accounting Pronouncements
Pronouncements Recently Adopted
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. FIN 46(R),
now known as ASC 810-10-30, Initial Measurement. ASC 810-10-30 amends the manner in which entities
evaluate whether consolidation is required for variable interest entities (VIEs). A company must
first perform a qualitative analysis in determining whether it must consolidate a VIE, and if the
qualitative analysis is not determinative, must perform a quantitative analysis. Further, ASC
810-10-30 requires that companies continually evaluate VIEs for consolidation, rather than
assessing based upon the occurrence of triggering events. ASC 810-10-30 also requires enhanced
disclosures about how a companys involvement with a VIE affects its financial statements and
exposure to risks. ASC 810-10-30 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC 810-10-30 did not have a material impact on CRLPs
consolidated condensed financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, an update to Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements
and Disclosures. ASU 2010-06 provides an update specifically to Subtopic 820-10 that requires new
disclosures including, details of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2
measurements and the reasons for the transfers and a gross presentation of activity within the
Level 3 roll forward, presenting separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements. ASU 2010-06 is effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning
after December 15, 2009, except for the gross presentation of the Level 3 roll forward, which is
required for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December
15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on CRLPs consolidated
condensed financial statements.
31
Table of Contents
Note 3 Restructuring Charges
As a result of CRLPs 2009 initiative to improve efficiencies with respect to management of
its existing properties and operation of its portfolio, including reducing overhead and postponing
or phasing future development activities, during the three months ended March 31, 2009, CRLP
reduced its workforce by eliminating certain positions resulting in the incurrence of an aggregate
of $0.8 million in termination benefits and severance related charges. Of the $0.8 million in
restructuring charges, approximately $0.4 million was associated with CRLPs multifamily segment,
including $0.2 million associated with development personnel, $0.3 million was associated with
CRLPs commercial segment, including $0.2 million associated with development personnel, and $0.1
million were non-divisional charges.
The expenses of CRLPs reduction in workforce and other termination costs, as described above,
are included in Restructuring charges in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations for
the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Note 4 Impairment
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, CRLP recorded $0.8 million as a result of
casualty losses at three multifamily apartment communities. The losses at two of these communities
were a result of fire damage and the loss at the other community was a result of carport structural
damage caused by inclement weather.
In February 2009, CRLP reached an agreement in principle to transfer its remaining
noncontrolling joint venture interest in Colonial Pinnacle Craft Farms I, a 220,000-square-foot
(excluding anchor-owned square-footage) retail shopping center located in Gulf Shores, Alabama, to
the majority joint venture partner. As a result of this agreement and the resulting asset
valuation, CRLP recorded an impairment charge of approximately $0.7 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2009, which represented CRLPs remaining equity interest in the joint venture.
In March 2009, CRLP completed the sale of the remaining 17 unsold units at the Regents Park
for-sale residential project located in Atlanta, Georgia for $16.3 million in cash. Since the
carrying value exceeded the sales price of the units, CRLP recorded an impairment charge of $0.3
million.
These charges, as described above, are included in Impairment and other losses in the
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
CRLPs determination of fair value is based on inputs management believes are consistent with
those that market participants would use. CRLP estimates the fair value of each property and
development project evaluated for impairment based on current market conditions and assumptions
made by management, which may differ materially from actual results if market conditions continue
to deteriorate or improve. Specific facts and circumstances of each project are evaluated,
including local market conditions, traffic, sales velocity, relative pricing and cost structure.
CRLP will continue to monitor the specific facts and circumstances at CRLPs for-sale properties
and development projects. Existing economic and market uncertainties may impact the number of
projects CRLP can sell, the timing of the sales and/or the prices at which CRLP can sell them in
future periods, and may result in additional impairment charges in connection with sales. If CRLP
is unable to sell projects, CRLP may incur additional impairment charges on projects previously
impaired as well as on projects not currently impaired but for which indicators of impairment may
exist, which would decrease the value of CRLPs assets as reflected on the balance sheet and
adversely affect net income and equity. There can be no assurances of the amount or pace of future
property sales and closings, particularly given current economic and market conditions.
32
Table of Contents
Note 5 Disposition Activity
Net income and gain on disposition of real estate for properties sold in which CRLP does not
maintain continuing involvement are reflected in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of
Operations as Discontinued Operations for all periods presented. All of the operating properties
sold during 2009 in which CRLP did not maintain a continuing interest were classified as
discontinued operations. The following are the properties CRLP disposed of in 2009 that are
classified as discontinued operations:
Units/ Square | ||||||||||||
Property | Location | Date Sold | Feet | |||||||||
Multifamily |
||||||||||||
Portofino at Jensen Beach |
Port St. Lucie, FL | September 2009 | 118 | |||||||||
Murano at Delray Beach |
West Palm Beach, FL | September 2009 | 93 | |||||||||
Commercial |
||||||||||||
Colonial Promenade Winter Haven |
Orlando, FL | December 2009 | 286,297 |
Additionally, CRLP classifies real estate assets as held for sale only after CRLP has
received approval by its internal investment committee, CRLP has commenced an active program to
sell the assets, CRLP does not intend to retain a continuing interest in the property, and in the
opinion of CRLPs management, it is probable the assets will sell within the next 12 months. As of
March 31, 2010, CRLP had classified four for-sale developments as held for sale. These real estate
assets are reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet at $33.9 million as
of March 31, 2010, which represents the lower of depreciated cost or fair value less costs to sell.
There is no mortgage debt associated with these properties as of March 31, 2010.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, CRLP transferred one commercial development and
two for-sale developments from assets held for sale to assets held for investment as CRLP has
decided it will hold this land for a longer term. In addition, CRLP reallocated the commercial
portion of two mixed-use development sites from assets held for sale to assets held for
investment.
As of March 31, 2010, CRLP did not have any operating properties classified as held for sale.
The operating results of properties (excluding condominium conversion properties not previously
operated) designated as held for sale or sold, are included in discontinued operations in the
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations for all periods presented. The reserves, if any,
to write down the carrying value of the real estate assets designated and classified as held for
sale are also included in discontinued operations (excluding condominium conversion properties not
previously operated). Additionally, any impairment losses on assets held for continuing use are
included in continuing operations.
Below is a summary of the operations of the properties classified as discontinued operations
during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(amounts in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Property revenues: |
||||||||
Base rent |
$ | (13 | ) | $ | 1,156 | |||
Tenant recoveries |
(15 | ) | 65 | |||||
Other revenue |
| 104 | ||||||
Total revenues |
(28 | ) | 1,325 | |||||
Property operating and administrative expenses |
4 | 645 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 139 | ||||||
Total expenses |
4 | 784 | ||||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations before net gain
on disposition of discontinued operations |
(32 | ) | 541 | |||||
Net (loss) gain on disposition of discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
(35 | ) | 45 | |||||
Noncontrolling interest in CRLP from discontinued operations |
8 | (163 | ) | |||||
Noncontrolling interest of limited partners |
(5 | ) | 468 | |||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, including noncontrolling interest |
$ | (64 | ) | $ | 891 | |||
33
Table of Contents
Note 6 For-Sale Activities
During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, CRLP, through CPSI, sold four and 33
units, respectively, at its for-sale residential development properties, including six condominium
conversion units in 2009.
The following is a summary of revenues and costs of condominium conversion and for-sale
residential activities (including activities in continuing and discontinued operations) for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(amounts in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Condominium conversion revenues, net |
$ | | $ | 327 | ||||
Condominium conversion costs |
| (259 | ) | |||||
Gains on condominium conversion sales, before income taxes |
| 68 | ||||||
For-sale residential revenues, net |
1,508 | 19,234 | ||||||
For-sale residential costs |
(1,531 | ) | (19,255 | ) | ||||
Losses on for-sale residential sales, before income taxes |
(23 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||
Provision for income taxes |
| (26 | ) | |||||
(Loss) gain on condominium conversions and for-sale
residential sales,
net of income taxes |
$ | (23 | ) | $ | 21 | |||
The net gains on condominium conversion sales are classified in discontinued operations
if the related condominium property was previously operated by CRLP as an apartment community. For
the three months ended March 31, 2009, net gains on condominium conversion sales of approximately
$42,000 are included in discontinued operations. As of December 31, 2009, CRLP had sold all
remaining condominium conversion properties.
For cash flow statement purposes, CRLP classifies capital expenditures for newly developed
for-sale residential communities and for other condominium conversion communities in investing
activities. Likewise, the proceeds from the sales of condominium units and other residential sales
are also included in investing activities.
34
Table of Contents
Note 7 Undeveloped Land and Construction in Progress
CRLP currently has two active development projects, as outlined in the table below. In 2009,
CRLP decided to postpone development activities associated with the projects listed under Future
Developments in the table below until it determines that the current economic environment has
sufficiently improved.
Costs | ||||||||||||
Total Units/ | Capitalized | |||||||||||
Square Feet (1) | to Date | |||||||||||
Location | (unaudited) | (in thousands) | ||||||||||
Active Developments: |
||||||||||||
Commercial Projects: |
||||||||||||
Colonial Promenade Craft Farms |
Gulf Shores, AL | 68 | $ | 8,003 | ||||||||
Colonial
Promenade Nord du Lac (Phase I) (2) |
Covington, LA | 174 | 7,282 | |||||||||
242 | $ | 15,285 | ||||||||||
Future Developments: |
||||||||||||
Multifamily Projects: |
||||||||||||
Colonial Grand at Sweetwater |
Phoenix, AZ | 195 | 7,246 | |||||||||
Colonial Grand at Thunderbird |
Phoenix, AZ | 244 | 8,312 | |||||||||
Colonial Grand at Randal Park (3) |
Orlando, FL | 750 | 19,200 | |||||||||
Colonial Grand at Hampton Preserve |
Tampa, FL | 486 | 14,998 | |||||||||
Colonial Grand at South End |
Charlotte, NC | 353 | 12,044 | |||||||||
Colonial Grand at Azure |
Las Vegas, NV | 188 | 7,804 | |||||||||
Colonial Grand at Cityway |
Austin, TX | 320 | 4,951 | |||||||||
2,536 | $ | 74,555 | ||||||||||
Commercial Projects: |
||||||||||||
Colonial Promenade Huntsville |
Huntsville, AL | 111 | 9,713 | |||||||||
Colonial Promenade Nord du Lac (2) |
Covington, LA | | 33,049 | |||||||||
111 | $ | 42,762 | ||||||||||
Other Projects and Undeveloped Land |
||||||||||||
Multifamily |
3,593 | |||||||||||
Commercial |
69,472 | |||||||||||
For-Sale Residential Land (4) |
70,342 | |||||||||||
$ | 143,407 | |||||||||||
Consolidated Construction in Progress |
$ | 276,009 | ||||||||||
(1) | Square footage is presented in thousands. Square footage for the retail assets excludes anchor-owned square footage. | |
(2) | Costs capitalized to date for this development, including costs for Phase I, are presented net of an aggregate of $25.8 million of non-cash impairment charges recorded during 2009 and 2008. | |
(3) | This project is part of a mixed-use development. CRLP is still evaluating plans for a multifamily apartment community. Therefore, costs attributable to this phase of development are subject to change. | |
(4) | These costs are presented net of a $24.6 million non-cash impairment charge recorded on two of the projects in 2009, 2008 and 2007. |
Interest capitalized on construction in progress during the three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009 was $0.4 million and $2.2 million, respectively.
35
Table of Contents
Note 8 Net (Loss) Income Per Unit
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, a reconciliation of the numerator and
denominator used in the basic and diluted income from continuing operations per common unit is as
follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||
(amounts in table in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
$ | (9,992 | ) | $ | 20,252 | |||
Less: |
||||||||
Income allocated to participating securities |
(98 | ) | (106 | ) | ||||
Noncontrolling interest of limited partners continuing operations |
82 | (1,009 | ) | |||||
Distributions to limited partner preferred unitholders |
(1,813 | ) | (1,813 | ) | ||||
Distributions to general partner preferred unitholders |
(2,034 | ) | (2,073 | ) | ||||
Preferred unit issuance costs, net of discount |
| (5 | ) | |||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations available to common
unitholders |
$ | (13,855 | ) | $ | 15,246 | |||
Denominator: |
||||||||
Denominator for basic net income per unit weighted average units |
74,582 | 57,025 | ||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||
Trustee and employee stock options, treasury method |
| | ||||||
Denominator
for diluted net income per unit
adjusted weighted average units |
74,582 | 57,025 | ||||||
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, CRLP reported a net loss from continuing
operations, and as such, 17,481 dilutive share equivalents have been excluded from the computation
of diluted net income per unit because including such share equivalents would be anti-dilutive.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, 1,373,754 outstanding share options (and a corresponding
number of units) were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per unit because the
grant date prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares/units and,
therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive.
Note 9 Capital Structure
At March 31, 2010, the Trust controlled CRLP as CRLPs sole general partner and as the holder
of approximately 89.5% interest in CRLP. The limited partners of CRLP who hold redeemable common
units are those persons (including certain officers and trustees of the Trust) who, at the time of
the Trusts initial public offering, elected to hold all or a portion of their interest in the form
of units rather than receiving common shares of the Trust, or individuals from whom CRLP acquired
certain properties who elected to receive units in exchange for the properties. Redeemable units
represent the number of outstanding limited partnership units as of the date of the applicable
balance sheet, valued at the greater of the closing market value of the Trusts common shares or
the aggregate value of the individual partners capital balances. Each redeemable unit may be
redeemed by the holder thereof for either cash equal to the fair market value of one common share
of the Trust at the time of such redemption or, at the option of the Trust, one common share of the
Trust. Additionally, CRLP has outstanding $100 million of Series B Preferred Units issued in a
private placement, that are exchangeable for 7.25% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual
Preferred Shares of the Trust in whole or in part at anytime on or after January 1, 2014 at the
option of the holders of the Series B Preferred Units. CRLP also has 400,474 outstanding Series D
Preferred Units, all of which are held by the Trust, as general partner of CRLP.
The Board of Trustees of the Trust manages CRLP by directing the affairs of CRLP. The Trusts
interest in CRLP entitles the Trust to share in cash distributions from, and in the profits and
losses of, CRLP in proportion to the Trusts percentage interest therein and entitle the Trust to
vote on all matters requiring a vote of the limited partners.
At-the-Market Equity Offering Program
On February 22, 2010, the Trusts Board of Trustees approved the issuance of up to $50.0
million of the Trusts common shares under an at-the-market equity offering program. On March 4,
2010, the Trust and CRLP entered into separate Equity Distribution Agreements with each of Merrill
Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC (each an Agent, and
together the Agents), respectively, pursuant to which the Trust may sell from time to time, in an
at-the-market equity offering program under its Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No.
333-158081), up to $50.0 million in aggregate offering price of its common shares. During the
three months ended March 31, 2010, the Trust issued 2,499,518 common shares at a weighted average
issue price of $13.25 per share generating net proceeds of
approximately $32.4 million. CRLP used these proceeds to repay a portion of the outstanding
balance under its unsecured credit facility and for general corporate purposes.
36
Table of Contents
Repurchases of Series D Preferred Depositary Shares
In October 2008, the Trusts Board of Trustees authorized a repurchase program which allowed
the Trust to repurchase up to an additional $25.0 million of its outstanding 8 1/8% Series D
preferred depositary shares over a 12 month period. The Trusts Board of Trustees, as general
partner of CRLP, also authorized the repurchase of a corresponding amount of Series D Preferred
Units of CRLP. During 2009, the Trust repurchased 6,515 shares of its outstanding 8 1/8% Series D
preferred depositary shares (and CRLP repurchased a corresponding amount of Series D Preferred
Units) in open market transactions for a purchase price of $126,761, or $19.46 per depositary
share. The Trust received a 22.2% discount on the repurchase to the liquidation preference price of
$25.00 per depositary share and wrote off a nominal amount of issuance costs. In the aggregate, the
Trust repurchased $24.1 million of its outstanding 8 1/8% Series D preferred depositary shares (and
CRLP has repurchased a corresponding amount of Series D Preferred Units) under this program, which
expired in late October 2009.
On January 27, 2010, the Trusts Board of Trustees authorized a new preferred securities
repurchase program which allows the Trust to repurchase up to $25 million of outstanding 8 1/8
percent Series D preferred depositary shares. The preferred shares may be repurchased from time to
time over the next 12 months in open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, subject
to applicable legal requirements, market conditions and other factors. This repurchase program does
not obligate the Trust to repurchase any specific amounts of preferred shares, and repurchases
pursuant to the program may be suspended or resumed at any time from time to time without further
notice or announcement. The Trust will continue to monitor the equity markets and repurchase
certain preferred shares that meet the Trusts required criteria, as funds are available. The
Trust did not repurchase any 8 1/8% Series D preferred depositary shares during the first quarter
of 2010.
Note 10 Segment Information
The Company currently manages its business based on the performance of two operating segments:
multifamily and commercial. The multifamily and commercial segments have separate management teams
that are responsible for acquiring, developing, managing and leasing properties within each
respective segment. The multifamily management team is responsible for all aspects of for-sale
developments, including disposition activities. The multifamily segment includes the operations
and assets of the for-sale developments due to the insignificance of these operations in the
periods presented. Commercial management is responsible for all aspects of CRLPs commercial
property operations, including the management and leasing services for 45 commercial properties, as
well as third-party management services for commercial properties in which CRLP does not have an
ownership interest and for brokerage services in other commercial property transactions.
The pro-rata portion of the revenues, net operating income (NOI), and assets of the
partially-owned unconsolidated entities in which CRLP has an interest are included in the
applicable segment information. Additionally, the revenues and NOI of properties sold that are
classified as discontinued operations are also included in the applicable segment information. In
reconciling the segment information presented below to total revenues, income from continuing
operations, and total assets, investments in partially-owned unconsolidated entities are eliminated
as equity investments and their related activity are reflected in the consolidated financial
statements as investments accounted for under the equity method, and discontinued operations are
reported separately. Management evaluates the performance of its multifamily and commercial
segments and allocates resources to them based on segment NOI. Segment NOI is defined as total
property revenues less total property operating expenses (such items as repairs and maintenance,
payroll, utilities, property taxes, insurance and advertising), and includes revenues/expenses from
unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Management evaluates the performance of its
for-sale residential business based on net gains / losses. Presented below is segment information,
for the multifamily and commercial segments, including the reconciliation of total segment revenues
to total revenues and total segment NOI to income from continuing operations before noncontrolling
interest for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, and total segment assets to total
assets as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
37
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||
Segment Revenues: |
||||||||
Multifamily |
$ | 75,877 | $ | 77,141 | ||||
Commercial |
20,991 | 23,474 | ||||||
Total Segment Revenues |
96,868 | 100,615 | ||||||
Partially-owned unconsolidated entities -
Multifamily |
(943 | ) | (2,001 | ) | ||||
Partially-owned unconsolidated entities -
Commercial |
(8,138 | ) | (16,484 | ) | ||||
Construction revenues |
| 35 | ||||||
Other non-property related revenue |
2,898 | 3,455 | ||||||
Discontinued operations property revenues |
28 | (1,325 | ) | |||||
Total Consolidated Revenues |
90,713 | 84,295 | ||||||
NOI: |
||||||||
Segment NOI: |
||||||||
Multifamily |
42,678 | 44,584 | ||||||
Commercial |
14,649 | 15,059 | ||||||
Total Segment NOI |
57,327 | 59,643 | ||||||
Partially-owned unconsolidated entities -
Multifamily |
(459 | ) | (1,033 | ) | ||||
Partially-owned unconsolidated entities -
Commercial |
(5,563 | ) | (10,569 | ) | ||||
Unallocated corporate revenues |
2,898 | 3,455 | ||||||
Discontinued operations property NOI |
32 | (681 | ) | |||||
Construction NOI |
| 1 | ||||||
Property management expenses |
(1,807 | ) | (1,918 | ) | ||||
General and administrative expenses |
(4,807 | ) | (4,382 | ) | ||||
Management fee and other expenses |
(2,673 | ) | (4,217 | ) | ||||
Restructuring charges |
| (812 | ) | |||||
Investment and development (1) |
(3 | ) | (165 | ) | ||||
Depreciation |
(30,279 | ) | (27,785 | ) | ||||
Amortization |
(2,224 | ) | (873 | ) | ||||
Impairment and other losses (2) |
(783 | ) | (1,054 | ) | ||||
Income from operations |
11,659 | 9,610 | ||||||
Total other income (expense), net (3) |
(21,651 | ) | 10,642 | |||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
$ | (9,992 | ) | $ | 20,252 | |||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
(in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Segment Assets |
||||||||
Multifamily |
$ | 2,482,764 | $ | 2,502,772 | ||||
Commercial |
534,118 | 538,046 | ||||||
Total Segment Assets |
3,016,882 | 3,040,818 | ||||||
Unallocated corporate assets (4) |
124,523 | 131,142 | ||||||
$ | 3,141,405 | $ | 3,171,960 | |||||
(1) | Reflects costs incurred related to potential mergers, acquisitions and abandoned pursuits. These costs are volatile and, therefore, may vary between periods. | |
(2) | For the three months ended March 31, 2010, CRLP incurred casualty losses related to property damage at three of CRLPs multifamily apartment communities. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, CRLP recorded a $1.0 million non-cash impairment charge. Of the charge, $0.7 million is related to the sale in April 2009 of our noncontrolling interest in the Colonial Pinnacle Craft Farms I joint venture and $0.3 million is related to the sale in March 2009 of the remaining 17 units at the Regents Park for-sale residential project. | |
(3) | For-sale residential activities, including net gain on sales and income tax expense (benefit), are included in the line item Total other income (expense) (see Note 6 related to for-sale activities). | |
(4) | Includes CRLPs investment in partially-owned entities of $15,693 as of March 31, 2010 and $17,422 as of December 31, 2009. |
38
Table of Contents
Note 11 Investment in Partially-Owned Entities
Investments in Consolidated Partially-Owned Entities
CRLP has one partially-owned investment, the CMS/Colonial Canyon Creek joint venture,
which is consolidated in its financial statements. As a result of a preferred equity contribution
of $11.5 million made by CRLP to the joint venture in September 2009 in connection with a
construction loan refinancing, CRLP began consolidating the CMS/Colonial Canyon Creek joint venture
in its financial statements beginning with the third quarter of 2009.
Investments in Unconsolidated Partially-Owned Entities
CRLP accounts for the following investments in unconsolidated partially-owned entities
using the equity method. The following table summarizes the investments in partially-owned
entities as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Percent | March 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||
Owned | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Multifamily: |
||||||||||||
Belterra, Ft. Worth, TX |
10.00 | % | $ | 500 | $ | 525 | ||||||
Regents Park (Phase II), Atlanta, GA |
40.00 | % (1) | 3,382 | 3,387 | ||||||||
CG at Huntcliff, Atlanta, GA |
20.00 | % | 1,603 | 1,646 | ||||||||
CG at McKinney, Dallas, TX |
25.00 | % (1) | 1,721 | 1,721 | ||||||||
CG at Research Park, Raleigh, NC |
20.00 | % | 891 | 914 | ||||||||
DRA CV at Cary, Raleigh, NC |
20.00 | % | 1,398 | 1,440 | ||||||||
DRA The Grove at Riverchase, Birmingham, AL |
20.00 | % | 1,102 | 1,133 | ||||||||
Total Multifamily |
$ | 10,597 | $ | 10,766 | ||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||
600 Building Partnership, Birmingham, AL |
33.33 | % | 169 | 154 | ||||||||
Colonial
Promenade Alabaster II/Tutwiler II, Birmingham, AL |
5.00 | % (2) | (54 | ) | (190 | ) | ||||||
Colonial Promenade Madison, Huntsville, AL |
25.00 | % | 2,108 | 2,119 | ||||||||
Colonial Promenade Smyrna, Smyrna, TN |
50.00 | % | 2,188 | 2,174 | ||||||||
DRA / CLP JV |
15.00 | % (3) | (16,161 | ) | (15,321 | ) | ||||||
Highway 150, LLC, Birmingham, AL |
10.00 | % | 53 | 59 | ||||||||
Bluerock, Huntsville, AL |
10.00 | % (4) | (4,846 | ) | (4,617 | ) | ||||||
Parkside Drive LLC I, Knoxville, TN |
50.00 | % | 2,777 | 3,073 | ||||||||
Parkside Drive LLC II, Knoxville, TN |
50.00 | % | 7,227 | 7,210 | ||||||||
Parkway Place Limited Partnership, Huntsville, AL |
50.00 | % | 9,852 | 10,168 | ||||||||
Total Commercial |
$ | 3,313 | $ | 4,829 | ||||||||
Other: |
||||||||||||
Colonial /
Polar-BEK Management Company, Birmingham, AL |
50.00 | % | 17 | 35 | ||||||||
Heathrow, Orlando, FL |
50.00 | % (1) | 1,766 | 1,792 | ||||||||
$ | 1,783 | $ | 1,827 | |||||||||
$ | 15,693 | $ | 17,422 | |||||||||
(1) | These joint ventures consist of undeveloped land. | |
(2) | Equity investment includes CRLPs investment of approximately $274,000, offset by the excess basis difference on the transaction of approximately $328,000, which is being amortized over the life of the properties. | |
(3) | As of March 31, 2010, this joint venture included 16 office properties and 2 retail properties located in Birmingham, Alabama; Orlando and Tampa, Florida; Atlanta, Georgia; Charlotte, North Carolina and Austin, Texas. Equity investment includes the value of CRLPs investment of approximately $16.2 million, offset by the excess basis difference on the June 2007 joint venture transaction of approximately $32.3 million, which is being amortized over the life of the properties. | |
(4) | Equity investment includes CRLPs investment of approximately $2.4 million, offset by the excess basis difference on the transaction of approximately $7.2 million, which is being amortized over the life of the properties. |
39
Table of Contents
Combined financial information for CRLPs investments in unconsolidated partially-owned
entities since the date of CRLPs acquisitions is as follows:
As of March 31, | As of December 31, | |||||||
(in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Balance Sheet |
||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Land, building, & equipment, net |
$ | 1,403,352 | $ | 1,416,526 | ||||
Construction in progress |
19,621 | 19,695 | ||||||
Other assets |
112,028 | 118,095 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,535,001 | $ | 1,554,316 | ||||
Liabilities and Partners Equity |
||||||||
Notes payable (1) |
$ | 1,210,337 | $ | 1,211,927 | ||||
Other liabilities |
104,698 | 108,277 | ||||||
Partners Equity |
219,966 | 234,112 | ||||||
Total liabilities and partners capital |
$ | 1,535,001 | $ | 1,554,316 | ||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Statement of Operations |
||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 46,305 | $ | 107,195 | ||||
Operating expenses |
(16,263 | ) | (40,679 | ) | ||||
Interest expense |
(17,627 | ) | (38,913 | ) | ||||
Depreciation, amortization and other |
(19,690 | ) | (39,972 | ) | ||||
Net loss (2) |
$ | (7,275 | ) | $ | (12,369 | ) | ||
(1) | CRLPs pro-rata share of indebtedness, as calculated based on ownership percentage, at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is $238.4 million and $239.1 million, respectively. | |
(2) | In addition to CRLPs pro-rata share of income (loss) from partially-owned unconsolidated entities, Income (loss) from partially-owned investments of $0.3 million and ($0.7) million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, includes gains on CRLPs dispositions of joint-venture interests and amortization of basis differences which are not reflected in the table above. |
Investments in Variable Interest Entities
CRLP evaluates all transactions and relationships with variable interest entities (VIEs) to
determine whether CRLP is the primary beneficiary.
Based on CRLPs evaluation, as of March 31, 2010, CRLP does not have a controlling interest
in, nor is CRLP the primary beneficiary of any VIEs for which there is a significant variable
interest except for, as discussed above Investments in Consolidated Partially-Owned Entities,
CMS/Colonial Canyon Creek, which CRLP began consolidating in September 2009, as discussed above in
Investments in Consolidated Partially-Owned Entities.
Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities
As of March 31, 2010, CRLP has an interest in one VIE with significant variable interests for
which CRLP is not the primary beneficiary.
With respect to the Colonial Grand at Traditions joint venture, CRLP and its joint venture
partner each committed to a partial loan repayment guarantee of $3.5 million of the principal
amount of a $34.1 million construction loan obtained by the joint venture, for a total guarantee of
$7.0 million of the principal amount. CRLP and its joint venture partner each committed to provide
50% of the guarantee, which is different from the relative voting and economic interests of the
parties in the joint venture. As a result, this investment qualifies as a VIE, but CRLP has
determined that it would not absorb a majority of the expected losses for this joint venture and,
therefore, does not consolidate the joint venture. In September 2009, CRLP determined that it was
probable that it would have to fund its partial loan repayment guarantee provided on the original
construction loan and recognized a $3.5 million charge to earnings. In addition, CRLP determined
that its 35% noncontrolling joint venture interest was impaired and that this impairment was other
than temporary. As a result, CRLP wrote-off its entire investment in the joint venture by
recording a non-cash impairment charge of $0.2 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2009.
The construction loan matured on April 15, 2010, but has not been repaid by the joint venture (see
Note 12 Unconsolidated Joint Venture Financing Activity).
40
Table of Contents
Note 12 Financing Activities
During 2009, CRLP, together with the Trust, obtained the following secured financing from
Fannie Mae:
| In the first quarter of 2009, CRLP, together with the Trust, closed on a $350.0 million collateralized credit facility (collateralized with 19 of CRLPs multifamily apartment communities totaling 6,565 units). Of the $350.0 million, $259.0 million bears interest at a fixed interest rate equal to 6.07% and $91.0 million bears interest at a fixed interest rate of 5.96%. The weighted average interest rate for this credit facility is 6.04%, and it matures on March 1, 2019; and |
| In the second quarter of 2009, CRLP, together with the Trust, closed on a $156.4 million collateralized credit facility (collateralized by eight of CRLPs multifamily apartment communities totaling 2,816 units). Of the $156.4 million, $145.2 million bears interest at a fixed interest rate equal to 5.27% and $11.2 million bears interest at a fixed interest rate of 5.57%. The weighted average interest rate for this credit facility is 5.31%, and it matures on June 1, 2019. |
Under both facilities, accrued interest is required to be paid monthly with no scheduled principal
payments required prior to the maturity date. The proceeds from these financings were used to
repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings under CRLPs unsecured credit facility.
As of March 31, 2010, CRLP, with the Trust as guarantor, had a $675.0 million unsecured
credit facility (as amended, the Credit Facility) with Wachovia Bank, National Association
(Wachovia), as Agent for the lenders, Bank of America, N.A. as Syndication Agent, Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association, Citicorp North America, Inc. and Regions Bank, as Co-Documentation
Agents, and U.S. Bank National Association and PNC Bank, National Association, as Co-Senior
Managing Agents and other lenders named therein. The Credit Facility has a maturity date of
June 21, 2012. In addition to the Credit Facility, CRLP has a $35.0 million cash management
line provided by Wachovia that will expire on June 21, 2012. The cash management line had an
outstanding balance of $7.6 million as of March 31, 2010.
Base rate loans and revolving loans are available under the Credit Facility. The Credit
Facility also includes a competitive bid feature that allows CRLP to convert up to $337.5
million under the Credit Facility to a fixed rate and for a fixed term not to exceed 90 days.
Generally, base rate loans bear interest at Wachovias designated base rate, plus a base rate
margin ranging up to 0.25% based on CRLPs unsecured debt ratings from time to time. Revolving
loans bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 0.325% to 1.05% based on CRLPs
unsecured debt ratings. Competitive bid loans bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin, as
specified by the participating lenders. Based on CRLPs current unsecured debt rating, the
revolving loans currently bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 105 basis points.
The Credit Facility and the cash management line, which are primarily used by CRLP to finance
property acquisitions and developments and more recently to also fund repurchases of CRLP senior
notes and Series D preferred depositary shares, had an outstanding balance at March 31, 2010 of
$312.6 million. The interest rate of the Credit Facility (including the cash management line) was
1.29% and 1.26% at March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The Credit Facility contains various restrictions, representations, covenants and events of
default that could preclude future borrowings (including future issuances of letters of credit) or
trigger early repayment obligations, including, but not limited to the following: nonpayment;
violation or breach of certain covenants; failure to perform certain covenants beyond a cure
period; failure to satisfy certain financial ratios; a material adverse change in the consolidated
financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects of CRLP; and generally not paying
CRLPs debts as they become due. At March 31, 2010, CRLP was in compliance with these covenants.
However, given the recent downturn in the economy and continued uncertainty in the stock and credit
markets, there can be no assurance that CRLP will be able to maintain compliance with these ratios
and other debt covenants in the future.
41
Table of Contents
Many of the recent disruptions in the financial markets have been brought about in large part
by failures in the U.S. banking system. If Wachovia or any of the other financial institutions that
have extended credit commitments to CRLP under the Credit Facility or otherwise are adversely
affected by the conditions of the financial markets, these financial institutions may become unable
to fund borrowings under credit commitments to CRLP under the Credit Facility, the cash management
line or otherwise. If these lenders become unable to fund CRLPs borrowings pursuant to the
financial institutions commitments, CRLP may need to obtain replacement financing, and such
financing, if available, may not be available on commercially attractive terms.
Unsecured Senior Notes Repurchases
During 2009, CRLP repurchased an aggregate of $181.0 million of its outstanding unsecured
senior notes in separate transactions. In addition, during 2009, CRLP completed two separate cash
tender offers for its outstanding unsecured senior notes. In April 2009, CRLP completed a cash
tender offer for $250 million in aggregate principal amount of its outstanding notes maturing in
2010 and 2011, and in September 2009, CRLP completed an additional cash tender offer for
$148.2 million in aggregate principal amount of its outstanding notes maturing in 2014, 2015 and
2016. As a result, during 2009, CRLP repurchased an aggregate of $579.2 million of its outstanding
unsecured senior notes at an aggregate average of 10.6% discount to par value, which represents an
8.1% yield to maturity. As a result of the repurchases, during 2009, CRLP recognized net gains of
approximately $54.7 million, which is included in Gains on retirement of debt on CRLPs
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Repurchases of the outstanding unsecured senior notes of CRLP during 2009 are as follows:
Yield-to- | ||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | Amount | Discount | Maturity | Net Gain (1) | ||||||||||||
1st Quarter |
$ | 96.9 | 27.1 | % | 12.64 | % | $ | 24.2 | ||||||||
2nd Quarter (2) |
315.5 | 5.9 | % | 6.75 | % | 16.2 | ||||||||||
3rd Quarter (3) |
166.8 | 10.0 | % | 7.87 | % | 14.3 | ||||||||||
4th Quarter |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 579.2 | 10.6 | % | 8.06 | % | $ | 54.7 |
(1) | Gains are presented net of the loss on hedging activities of $1.1 million recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and $0.6 million recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2009 as the result of a reclassification of amounts in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) in connection with the conclusion that it is probable that CRLP will not make interest payments associated with previously hedged debt as a result of the repurchases under the senior note repurchase program. | |
(2) | Repurchases include $250.0 million repurchased pursuant to CRLPs tender offer that closed on May 4, 2009, which was conducted outside of the senior note repurchase program. | |
(3) | Repurchases include $148.2 million repurchased pursuant to CRLPs tender offer that closed on August 31, 2009, which was conducted outside of the senior note repurchase program. |
On January 27, 2010, the Trusts Board of Trustees authorized a new unsecured notes
repurchase program which allows CRLP to repurchase up to $100 million of its outstanding unsecured
senior notes. This new repurchase program runs through December 31, 2010. Under this program,
senior notes may be repurchased from time to time in open market transactions or privately
negotiated transactions, subject to applicable legal requirements, market conditions and other
factors. The repurchase program does not obligate the repurchase of any specific amounts of senior
notes, and repurchases pursuant to the program may be suspended or resumed at any time from time to
time without further notice or announcement. CRLP will continue to monitor the debt markets and
repurchase certain senior notes that meet CRLPs required criteria, as funds are available. CRLP
anticipates funding potential repurchases from borrowings under its existing credit facility,
proceeds from property sales and/or other available funds.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, CRLP repurchased $8.7 million in unsecured
senior notes, at a 1.0% discount to par value, which represents a 6.51% yield to maturity and
resulted in the recognition of negligible net gains.
42
Table of Contents
Unconsolidated Joint Venture Financing Activity
During April 2007, CRLP and its joint venture partner each committed to guarantee up to $3.5
million, for an aggregate of up to $7.0 million, of a $34.1 million construction loan obtained by
the Colonial Grand at Traditions joint venture. Construction at this site is complete as the
project was placed into service during 2008. On September 25, 2009, CRLP determined it was
probable that it would have to fund the partial loan repayment guarantee provided on the original
construction loan. Accordingly, on September 30, 2009, $3.5 million was recorded for the guarantee.
As of March 31, 2010, the joint venture had drawn $33.4 million on the construction loan, which
matured by its terms on April 15, 2010. The estimated fair market value of the property in the
joint venture is significantly less than the principal amount outstanding on this loan. To date,
the joint venture has not repaid the outstanding principal amount due on the construction loan. The
joint venture, including CRLP and its joint venture partner, and the lender have engaged in
discussions in an attempt to reach a mutually acceptable arrangement with respect to the
outstanding loan. However, the parties have been unsuccessful in negotiating a mutually acceptable
arrangement with respect to the outstanding loan. The lender has made a demand on the joint
venture for the outstanding balance under the loan. The lender has also made a demand on CRLP for
the $3.5 million guarantee payment, together with outstanding interest on the loan (which as of
April 16, 2010 was approximately $0.05 million). No assurance can be given that the joint venture
or CRLP will be able to reach a mutually satisfactory resolution of this dispute with the lender.
As of March 31, 2010, the Colonial Promenade Smyrna joint venture had $28.2 million
outstanding on the construction loan, which matured by its terms in December 2009. CRLP has
guaranteed up to $8.65 million (currently $4.3 million) of this loan (see Note 14). The joint
venture is currently in negotiations with the lender regarding its options (see Note 15).
There can be no assurance that CRLPs joint ventures will be successful in refinancing and/or
replacing existing debt at maturity or otherwise. If the joint ventures are unable to obtain
additional financing, payoff the existing loans that are maturing, or renegotiate suitable terms
with the existing lenders, the lenders generally would have the right to foreclose on the
properties in question and, accordingly, the joint ventures will lose their interests in the
assets. The failure to refinance and/or replace such debt and other factors with respect to CRLPs
joint venture interests (discussed in the Item 1A: Risk Factors in CRLPs 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K) may materially adversely impact the value of CRLPs joint venture interests, which, in
turn, could have a material adverse effect on CRLPs financial condition and results of operations.
Note 13 Derivatives and Hedging
CRLP is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic
conditions. CRLP principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational
risks through management of its core business activities. CRLP manages economic risks, including
interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration
of its debt funding and the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, CRLP enters
into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that
result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which is
determined by interest rates. CRLPs derivative financial instruments are used to manage
differences in the amount, timing, and duration of CRLPs known or expected cash receipts and its
known or expected cash payments principally related to CRLPs investments and borrowings.
CRLPs objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense
and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, CRLP primarily
uses interest rate swaps and caps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest
rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a
counterparty in exchange for CRLP making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements
without exchange of the underlying notional amount. Interest rate caps designated as cash flow
hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rise
above the strike rate on the contract in exchange for an upfront premium.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and that
qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss on the
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period
that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. CRLP did not have any active cash flow
hedges during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
43
Table of Contents
At March 31, 2010, CRLP had $2.8 million in Accumulated other comprehensive loss related to
settled or terminated derivatives. Amounts reported in Accumulated other comprehensive loss
related to derivatives will be reclassified to Interest expense as interest payments are made on
CRLPs variable-rate debt or to Loss on hedging activities at such time that the interest
payments on the hedged debt become probable of not occurring as a result of CRLPs
senior note repurchase program. The changes in Accumulated other comprehensive loss for
reclassifications to Interest expense tied to interest payments on the hedged debt were $0.1
million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. CRLP did not reclassify amounts to
Loss on hedging activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010. For the three months ended
March 31, 2009, the change in Accumulated other comprehensive loss for reclassification to Loss
on hedging activities related to interest payments on the hedged debt that have been deemed
probable not to occur as a result of CRLPs prior senior note repurchase program was $1.1 million.
Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage CRLPs
exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the strict hedge
accounting requirements. As of March 31, 2010, CRLP had no derivatives that were not designated as
a hedge in a qualifying hedging relationship.
Note
14 Contingencies and Guarantees
Contingencies
CRLP is involved in a contract dispute with a general contractor in connection with
construction costs and cost overruns with respect to certain of its for-sale projects, which were
developed in a joint venture in which CRLP is a majority owner. The contractor is affiliated with
CRLPs joint venture partner.
| In connection with the dispute, in January 2008, the contractor filed a lawsuit against CRLP alleging, among other things, breach of contract, enforcement of a lien against real property, misrepresentation, conversion, declaratory judgment and an accounting of costs, and is seeking $10.3 million in damages, plus consequential and punitive damages. |
| Certain of the subcontractors, vendors and other parties, involved in the projects, including purchasers of units, have also made claims in the form of lien claims, general claims or lawsuits. CRLP has been sued by purchasers of certain condominium units alleging breach of contract, fraud, construction deficiencies and misleading sales practices. Both compensatory and punitive damages are sought in these actions. Some of these claims have been resolved by negotiations and mediations, and others may also be similarly resolved. Some of these claims will likely be arbitrated or litigated to conclusion. |
CRLP is continuing to evaluate its options and investigate certain of these claims, including
possible claims against the contractor and other parties. CRLP intends to vigorously defend itself
against these claims. However, no prediction of the likelihood, or amount, of any resulting loss
or recovery can be made at this time and no assurance can be given that the matter will be resolved
favorably.
In connection with certain retail developments, CRLP has received funding from municipalities
for infrastructure costs. In most cases, the municipalities issue bonds that are repaid primarily
from sales tax revenues generated from the tenants at each respective development. CRLP has
guaranteed the shortfall, if any, of tax revenues to the debt service requirements on the bonds.
The total amount outstanding on these bonds is approximately $13.5 million at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, no liability was recorded for these
guarantees.
As a result of transactions executed in 2007, CRLP implemented its strategic initiative to
become a multifamily focused REIT, which included two significant joint venture transactions
whereby the majority of CRLPs wholly-owned commercial properties were transferred into separate
joint ventures. In December 2009, CRLP disposed of its interest in one of these joint ventures but
continues to retain its interest in the other joint venture. In connection with the 2007 joint
venture transactions, CRLP assumed certain contingent obligations for a total of $15.7 million, of
which $6.1 million remains outstanding as of March 31, 2010.
As of March 31, 2010, CRLP is self insured up to $0.8 million, $1.0 million and $1.8 million
for general liability, workers compensation and property insurance, respectively. CRLP is also
self insured for health insurance and responsible for amounts up to $135,000 per claim and up to
$2.0 million per person.
CRLP is a party to various other legal proceedings incidental to its business. In the opinion
of management, after consultation with legal counsel, the ultimate liability, if any, with respect
to those proceedings is not presently expected to materially affect the financial position or
results of operations or cash flows of CRLP.
44
Table of Contents
Guarantees and Other Arrangements
With respect to the Colonial Grand at Traditions joint venture, CRLP and its joint venture
partner each committed to guarantee $3.5 million, for a total of $7.0 million, of a $34.1 million
construction loan obtained by the joint venture. As of March 31, 2010, the joint venture had drawn
$33.4 million on the construction loan, which matured by its terms on April 15, 2010 (see Note 12).
During November 2006, CRLP and its joint venture partner each committed to guarantee up to
$8.65 million, for an aggregate of up to $17.3 million, of a $34.6 million construction loan
obtained by the Colonial Promenade Smyrna joint venture. CRLP and its joint venture partner each
committed to provide 50% of the $17.3 million guarantee, as each partner has a 50% ownership
interest in the joint venture. Construction at this site was completed in 2008. The guarantee
provided, among other things, for a reduction in the guarantee amount in the event the property
achieves and maintains a 1.15 debt service charge. Accordingly, the guarantee has been reduced to
$4.3 million. As of March 31, 2010, the Colonial Promenade Smyrna joint venture had $28.2 million
outstanding on the construction loan, which matured by its terms in December 2009. The joint
venture is currently in negotiations with the lender with respect to its options. At March 31,
2010, no liability was recorded for the guarantee (see Note 15).
In connection with the formation of Highway 150 LLC in 2002, CRLP executed a guarantee,
pursuant to which CRLP serves as a guarantor of $1.0 million of the debt related to the joint
venture, which is collateralized by the Colonial Promenade Hoover retail property. CRLPs maximum
guarantee of $1.0 million may be requested by the lender only after all of the rights and remedies
available under the associated note and security agreements have been exercised and exhausted. At
March 31, 2010, the total amount of debt of the joint venture was approximately $16.0 million and
the debt matures in December 2012. At March 31, 2010, no liability was recorded for the guarantee.
In connection with the contribution of certain assets to CRLP, certain partners of CRLP have
guaranteed indebtedness of CRLP totaling $21.2 million at March 31, 2010. The guarantees are held
in order for the contributing partners to maintain their tax deferred status on the contributed
assets. These individuals have not been indemnified by CRLP.
As discussed above, in connection with certain retail developments, CRLP has received funding
from municipalities for infrastructure costs. In most cases, the municipalities issue bonds that
are repaid primarily from sales tax revenues generated from the tenants at each respective
development. CRLP has guaranteed the shortfall, if any, of tax revenues to the debt service
requirements on the bonds.
The fair value of the above guarantees could change in the near term if the markets in which
these properties are located deteriorate or if there are other negative indicators.
Note 15 Subsequent Events
Financing Activity
On May 3, 2010, CRLP acquired the outstanding Colonial Promenade Smyrna joint venture
construction note from the lender at par (see Note 14). This note, which had an original principal
amount of $34.6 million and matured by its terms in December 2009, had not been repaid and had an
outstanding balance of $28.3 million as of the date of purchase. CRLP has agreed with its joint
venture partner to extend the maturity date of the note consistent with the original extension
terms of the note, which provided for an option to extend maturity for two additional consecutive
one year periods. Accordingly, the maturity date of the note has been extended to December 2010
with an option to extend for one additional year. As a result of this transaction, CRLPs
guarantee on this note has terminated, but the joint venture partners guarantee (as discussed in
Note 14) remains in place.
Distribution
On April 28, 2010, a cash distribution was declared to shareholders of the Trust and partners
of CRLP in the amount of $0.15 per common share and per unit, totaling approximately $11.6 million.
The distribution was declared to shareholders and partners of record as of May 10, 2010 and will
be paid on May 17, 2010.
45
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion analyzes the financial condition and results of operations of both
Colonial Properties Trust, or the Trust, and Colonial Realty Limited Partnership, or CRLP, of
which the Trust is the sole general partner and in which the Trust owned an 89.5% limited partner
interest as of March 31, 2010. The Trust conducts all of its business and owns all of its
properties through CRLP and CRLPs various subsidiaries. Except as otherwise required by the
context, the Company, Colonial, we, us and our refer to the Trust and CRLP together, as
well as CRLPs subsidiaries, including Colonial Properties Services Limited Partnership (CPSLP),
Colonial Properties Services, Inc. (CPSI) and CLNL Acquisition Sub, LLC.
The following discussion and analysis of the consolidated condensed financial condition and
consolidated results of operations should be read together with the consolidated financial
statements of the Trust and CRLP and the notes thereto contained in this Form 10-Q. This Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as may,
will, should, expects, plans, anticipates, estimates, predicts, potential, or the
negative of these terms or comparable terminology. Such forward-looking statements involve known
and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our and our affiliates, or the
industrys actual results, performance, achievements or transactions to be materially different
from any future results, performance, achievements or transactions expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, the risks described under the caption
Risk Factors in the Trusts and CRLPs 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K (the 2009 Form 10-K).
Such factors include, among others, the following:
| the deterioration of the economy and high unemployment in the U.S., together with the downturn in the overall U.S. housing market resulting in weakness in the multifamily market; |
| national and local economic, business and real estate conditions generally, including, but not limited to, the effect on demand for multifamily units and commercial rental space from the creation of new multifamily and commercial developments, the extent, strength and duration of the current recession or recovery, the availability and creditworthiness of tenants, the level of lease rents, and the availability of financing for both tenants and us; |
| adverse changes in real estate markets, including, but not limited to, the extent of tenant bankruptcies, financial difficulties and defaults, the extent of future demand for multifamily units and commercial space in our core markets and barriers of entry into new markets which we may seek to enter in the future, the extent of decreases in rental rates, competition, our ability to identify and consummate attractive acquisitions on favorable terms, our ability to consummate any planned dispositions in a timely manner on acceptable terms, and our ability to reinvest sale proceeds in a manner that generates favorable returns; |
| exposure, as a multifamily focused real estate investment trust (REIT), to risks inherent in investments in a single industry; |
| risks associated with having to perform under various financial guarantees that we have provided with respect to certain of our joint ventures and developments; |
| ability to obtain financing at reasonable rates, if at all; |
| actions, strategies and performance of affiliates that we may not control or companies, including joint ventures, in which we have made investments; |
| changes in operating costs, including real estate taxes, utilities, and insurance; |
| higher than expected construction costs; |
| uncertainties associated with our ability to sell our existing inventory of condominium and for-sale residential assets, including timing, volume and terms of sales; |
| uncertainties associated with the timing and amount of real estate dispositions and the resulting gains/losses associated with such dispositions; |
| legislative or other regulatory decisions, including tax legislation, government approvals, actions and initiatives, including the need for compliance with environmental and safety requirements, and changes in laws and regulations or the interpretation thereof; |
| the Trusts ability to continue to satisfy complex rules in order for it to maintain its status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, the ability of CRLP to satisfy the rules to maintain its status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to maintain their status as taxable REIT subsidiaries for federal income tax purposes, and our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to operate effectively within the limitations imposed by these rules; |
46
Table of Contents
| price volatility, dislocations and liquidity disruptions in the financial markets and the resulting impact on availability of financing; |
| effect of any rating agency actions on the cost and availability of new debt financing; |
| level and volatility of interest or capitalization rates or capital market conditions; |
| effect of any terrorist activity or other heightened geopolitical crisis; and |
| other risks identified in the 2009 Form 10-K and, from time to time, in other reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) or in other documents that we publicly disseminate. |
We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements to
reflect events, circumstances or changes in expectations after the date of this report.
General
We are a multifamily-focused self-administered equity REIT that owns, develops and operates
multifamily apartment communities primarily located in the Sunbelt region of the United States.
Also, we create additional value for our shareholders by managing commercial assets through joint
venture investments and pursuing development opportunities. We are a fully-integrated real estate
company, which means that we are engaged in the acquisition, development, ownership, management and
leasing of multifamily apartment communities and other commercial real estate properties. Our
activities include full or partial ownership and operation of 156 properties as of March 31, 2010,
located in Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Nevada, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee,
Texas and Virginia, development of new properties, acquisition of existing properties,
build-to-suit development and the provision of management, leasing and brokerage services for
commercial real estate.
As of March 31, 2010, we owned or maintained a partial ownership in 111 multifamily apartment
communities containing a total of 33,524 apartment units (including 105 consolidated properties
aggregating 31,250 units, of which 104 are wholly-owned and one is partially-owned, and six
properties partially-owned through unconsolidated joint venture entities aggregating 2,004 units)
(the multifamily apartment communities), 45 commercial properties containing a total of
approximately 12.7 million square feet (consisting of nine wholly-owned consolidated properties and
36 properties partially-owned through unconsolidated joint-venture entities aggregating 3.2 million
and 9.5 million square feet, respectively) (the commercial properties) and certain parcels of
land adjacent to or near certain of these properties (the land). The multifamily apartment
communities, the commercial properties and the land are referred to herein collectively as the
properties. As of March 31, 2010, consolidated multifamily apartment communities and commercial
properties that had achieved stabilized occupancy (which we have defined as having occurred once
the property has attained 93% physical occupancy) were 96.7% and 90.1% leased, respectively.
The Trust is the direct general partner of, and as of March 31, 2010 held approximately 89.5%
of the interests in, CRLP. We conduct all of our business through CRLP, CPSLP, which provides
management services for our properties and CPSI, which provides management services for properties
owned by third parties, including unconsolidated joint venture entities. We perform all of our
for-sale residential and condominium conversion activities through CPSI.
As a lessor, the majority of our revenue is derived from residents and tenants under existing
leases at our properties. Therefore, our operating cash flow is dependent upon the rents that we
are able to charge to our residents and tenants, and the ability of these residents and tenants to
make their rental payments. We also receive third-party management fees generated from third party
management agreements related to management of properties held in joint ventures.
The Trust was formed in Maryland on July 9, 1993. The Trust was reorganized as an Alabama
real estate investment trust in 1995. Our executive offices are located at 2101 Sixth Avenue
North, Suite 750, Birmingham, Alabama, 35203 and our telephone number is (205) 250-8700.
47
Table of Contents
Business Strategy and Outlook
Since mid-2008, we have experienced a global financial and economic crisis, which included,
among other things, significant reductions and disruptions in available capital and liquidity from
banks and other providers of credit, substantial reductions and/or volatility in equity values
worldwide, significant job losses in the U.S., a slowdown in the overall U.S. housing market and
concerns that the weakening U.S. and worldwide economies could enter into a prolonged recessionary
period. In response to the economic crisis, we focused on the following strategic initiatives in
2009:
| Strengthen the balance sheet; |
| Improve liquidity; |
| Address near-term maturities; |
| Reduce overhead; and |
| Postpone/phase future developments. |
During 2009, we made significant progress in implementing each of these strategic initiatives,
including selling $157.7 million of non-core assets, raising $152.4 million of equity capital
through two separate equity offerings and securing a total of $506.4 million in fixed-rate
financings with Fannie Mae. With the proceeds of these activities, we were able to eliminate a
significant portion of our near-term debt maturities by repurchasing $579.2 million of unsecured
senior notes of CRLP and by exiting seven joint ventures, which eliminated $231.1 million of our
pro-rata share of property-specific mortgage debt exposure. In addition, since the fall of 2008,
we have reduced our workforce by more than 10%, which we expect to generate approximately $20.7
million in annualized savings. We believe that the steps that we have taken to achieve our 2009
strategic initiatives have positioned us to be able to continue to work through the challenges
created by the current economic environment.
For 2010, we have established the following strategic initiatives:
| Simplify our business; |
| Improve operating margins; |
| Strengthen the balance sheet; and |
| Grow the company |
Our first strategic initiative for 2010 is to simplify our business. We plan to maintain our
primary focus on multifamily operations with a view toward increasing operating income generated
from our multifamily portfolio to greater than 90% of our total operating income. We also plan to
look for opportunities to exit from existing joint ventures. Additionally, we plan to continue
refining our corporate operations, including streamlining our processes, procedures and
organizational structure to create efficiencies and reduce associated overhead.
Our second strategic initiative for 2010 is to improve our operating margins. While we expect
that property level margins will continue to be under pressure for the majority of 2010, we will
look to improve our overall corporate operating margins through the selective sale of non-income
producing assets and through additional efforts to control expenses. We anticipate that 2010 net
income from our multifamily operations will remain under pressure from lack of job growth in the
economy and the corresponding adverse effect of unemployment on rental revenue. Despite recent
signs of economic improvement in our markets, we feel it is still too early to determine if there
will be sustainable job growth, which is a key driver of income growth in multifamily real estate.
Our third strategic initiative for 2010 is to maintain our focus on strengthening the balance
sheet, primarily by reducing our level of outstanding debt. During the three months ended March 31,
2010, the Trust issued 2,499,518 common shares under its $50.0 million at-the-market equity
offering program at an average issue price of $13.25 per share, raising net proceeds of $32.4
million. We used these proceeds to repay a portion of the outstanding balance under our unsecured
credit facility and for general corporate purposes. In addition, during the first quarter 2010, we
repurchased $8.7 million of unsecured senior notes of CRLP under our existing note repurchase
program. As of March 31, 2010, we have $20.0 million and $56.9 million of consolidated debt
maturing in 2010 and 2011, respectively, with $362.4 million of availability under our unsecured
credit facility. Through these actions we are continuing to build on the progress that we made in
2009 to strengthen the balance sheet.
Our fourth strategic initiative for 2010 is to grow the company. We intend to focus on
achieving earnings growth from our existing multifamily portfolio to restore earnings to at least
pre-recession levels. Additionally, we plan to actively explore new acquisition opportunities,
focusing on newer, attractively priced assets in markets that have been significantly adversely
affected by the economic downturn and are poised for potential economic recovery from which we
believe are well-positioned to benefit. Continued fundamental improvement in our markets could
also lead us to renewing our development efforts on
multifamily land that we already own. We expect to fund any such potential transactions with
availability under our unsecured credit facility and proceeds from our $50.0 million
at-the-market equity offering program.
48
Table of Contents
We expect the remainder of 2010 to continue to be challenging despite recent indications of
improving economic conditions. As long as job growth continues to lag, we expect continued
pressure on revenue. We believe, however, that a sustained increase in employment levels, among
other things, will facilitate the successful execution of our 2010 strategic initiatives, which
should position us for improvement into 2011 and 2012.
Executive Summary of Results of Operations
The following discussion of results of operations should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations of the Trust and CRLP and the Operating Results
Summary included below.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Trust reported a net loss available to
common shareholders of $12.3 million, compared with net income available to common shareholders
of $13.9 million for the comparable prior year period. For the three months ended March 31,
2010, CRLP reported a net loss available to common unitholders of $13.8 million, compared with
net income available to common unitholders of $16.4 million for the comparable prior year
period.
Operating Results Summary
The following operating results summary is provided for reference purposes and is
intended to be read in conjunction with the narrative discussion. This information is presented to
correspond with the manner in which we analyze our operating results.
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
(amounts in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | Variance | |||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||
Minimum rent |
$ | 73,482 | $ | 70,239 | $ | 3,243 | ||||||
Tenant recoveries |
2,789 | 1,066 | 1,723 | |||||||||
Other property related revenue |
11,544 | 9,500 | 2,044 | |||||||||
Construction revenues |
| 35 | (35 | ) | ||||||||
Other non-property related revenues |
2,898 | 3,455 | (557 | ) | ||||||||
Total revenue |
90,713 | 84,295 | 6,418 | |||||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||||||
Property operating expenses |
25,419 | 22,469 | 2,950 | |||||||||
Taxes, licenses and insurance |
11,059 | 10,976 | 83 | |||||||||
Construction expenses |
| 34 | (34 | ) | ||||||||
Property management expenses |
1,807 | 1,918 | (111 | ) | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
4,807 | 4,382 | 425 | |||||||||
Management fee and other expense |
2,673 | 4,217 | (1,544 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring charges |
| 812 | (812 | ) | ||||||||
Investment and development |
3 | 165 | (162 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation & amortization |
32,503 | 28,658 | 3,845 | |||||||||
Impairment |
783 | 1,054 | (271 | ) | ||||||||
Total operating expenses |
79,054 | 74,685 | 4,369 | |||||||||
Income from operations |
11,659 | 9,610 | 2,049 | |||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(20,901 | ) | (20,432 | ) | (469 | ) | ||||||
Debt cost amortization |
(1,185 | ) | (1,303 | ) | 118 | |||||||
Gains on retirement of debt |
28 | 25,319 | (25,291 | ) | ||||||||
Interest income |
393 | 301 | 92 | |||||||||
(Loss) income from partially-owned unconsolidated entities |
270 | (650 | ) | 920 | ||||||||
Loss on hedging activities |
| (1,063 | ) | 1,063 | ||||||||
(Loss) gain from sales of property, net of income taxes |
(7 | ) | 5,380 | (5,387 | ) | |||||||
Income taxes and other |
(249 | ) | 3,090 | (3,339 | ) | |||||||
Total other income (expense) |
(21,651 | ) | 10,642 | (32,293 | ) | |||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
$ | (9,992 | ) | $ | 20,252 | $ | (30,244 | ) | ||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
$ | (67 | ) | $ | 586 | $ | (653 | ) |
49
Table of Contents
Results of Operations Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
Minimum rent
Minimum rent for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $73.5 million, an increase of $3.2
million from the comparable prior year period. Minimum rent increased $4.5 million attributable to
the effect of the consolidation of one multifamily apartment community and the acquisition of two
commercial properties since the first quarter of 2009, partially offset by a decrease in minimum
rent at multifamily apartment communities that were stabilized during both periods We define
stabilized communities as those that have attained 93% physical occupancy.
Tenant recoveries
Tenant recoveries for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were $2.8 million, an increase of
$1.7 million from the comparable prior year period as a result of the acquisition of two commercial
properties during 2009.
Other property related revenue
Other property related revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $11.5 million, an
increase of $2.0 million from the comparable prior year period. Of the increase, $1.3 million is
attributable to our multifamily cable revenue program, which has now been fully implemented, and
the remaining increase is attributable to the consolidation of one multifamily apartment community
and developments placed into service since the first quarter of 2009.
Other non-property related revenues
Other non-property related revenues, which consist primarily of management fees, development
fees, and other miscellaneous fees, were $2.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, a
decrease of $0.6 million as compared to the same period in 2009, due to terminated management
contracts as a result of the disposition in 2009 of our interests in certain joint ventures.
Property operating expenses
Property operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were $25.4 million, an
increase of $3.0 million from the comparable prior year period. Of the increase, $1.6 million is
attributable to the consolidation of one multifamily apartment community and the acquisitions of
two commercial properties since the first quarter of 2009. The remaining increase is primarily due
to repairs and maintenance expenses associated with an increase in occupancy rates, cable
television expenses related to the rollout of our bulk cable program and salaries.
Taxes, licenses and insurance
Taxes, licenses and insurance expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were $11.1
million, an increase of $0.1 million from the comparable prior year period. The increase was
primarily attributable to the consolidation of one multifamily apartment community and the
acquisitions of two commercial properties since the first quarter of 2009, offset by a decline in
related expenses at our stabilized multifamily apartment communities.
Property management expenses
Property management expenses consist of regional supervision and accounting costs related to
consolidated property operations. These expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were
$1.8 million, a decrease of $0.1 million from the comparable prior year period. The decrease was
primarily due to a reduction in overhead.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were $4.8
million, an increase of $0.4 million from the comparable prior year period primarily due to
increases in incentive compensation.
50
Table of Contents
Management fee and other expenses
Management fee and other expenses consist of property management and other services provided
to third parties. These expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were $2.7 million, a
decrease of $1.5 million from the comparable prior year period. The decrease was primarily due to
overhead reductions related to the termination of management contracts in connection with the
disposition of our interests in certain joint ventures in 2009.
Restructuring charges
We incurred no restructuring charges during the three months ended March 31, 2010. During the
three months ended March 31, 2009, we incurred restructuring charges of $0.8 million as a result of
our efforts to reduce overhead. See Note 3 to the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial
Statements of the Trust and CRLP included in this Form 10-Q for additional details.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $32.5
million, an increase of $3.8 million from the comparable prior year period. Of the increase, $3.3
million is attributable to the consolidation of one multifamily apartment community and the
acquisitions of two commercial properties since the first quarter of 2009, with the remaining
increase attributed to developments placed into service during 2009.
Impairment and other losses
Included in impairment and other losses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 are casualty
losses of $0.8 million, which resulted from property damage at three of our multifamily apartment
communities. The three months ended March 31, 2009, included $0.3 million associated with the
closing on the sale of our remaining 17 units at Regents Park, a for-sale residential development,
and $0.7 million related to the sale of our remaining 15% interest in Colonial Pinnacle Craft Farms
I. See Note 4 to the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements of the Trust and CRLP
included in this Form 10-Q for additional details.
Interest expense
Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $20.9 million, an increase of
$0.5 million from the comparable prior year period. The increase is primarily attributable to a
$1.9 million reduction in capitalized interest as a result of no longer capitalizing interest on
assets held for future development, partially offset by a lower weighted average interest rate on
our total consolidated debt when compared to the prior year period.
Debt cost amortization
Debt cost amortization for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $1.2 million, a decrease
of $0.1 million from the comparable prior year period. The decrease is attributable to a change in
our debt mix i.e., a decrease in the outstanding balance of our unsecured bonds and an increase
in the outstanding balance of our credit facility from the prior year period.
Gains on retirement of debt
Gains on retirement of debt for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were minimal as
compared to a $25.3 million gain, excluding write-offs related to hedging activities, for the
comparable prior year period. Gains in the first quarter of 2010 are related to the repurchase
of $8.7 million of outstanding unsecured senior notes at an average 1.0% discount to par value.
Gains in the first quarter of 2009 are related to the repurchase of $96.9 million of outstanding
unsecured senior notes at an average discount to par value of 27.1%.
Interest income
Interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $0.4 million, an increase of
$0.1 million from the comparable prior year period. The increase was primarily due to three
months worth of interest earned on a note issued as a result of the sale of Colonial Promenade
Fultondale during the first quarter of 2009.
51
Table of Contents
Income (loss) from partially-owned unconsolidated entities
Income (loss) from partially-owned unconsolidated entities for the three months ended March
31, 2010 was income of $0.3 million compared to a loss of $0.7 million from the comparable prior
year period. The increase was primarily attributable to the disposition of our interests in
certain joint ventures during 2009.
Loss on hedging activities
We did not engage in any hedging activities during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Loss on hedging activities for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $1.1 million. In 2009, we
recognized a loss on hedging activities as a result of a reclassification of amounts in
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss in connection with the conclusion that it is probable that
we will not make interest payments associated with previously hedged debt as a result of
repurchases under our senior note repurchase program. See Note 12 to the Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements of the Trust and CRLP included in this Form 10-Q for additional
details.
(Loss) gain from sale of property
(Loss) gain from sale of property, net of income taxes, for the three months ended March 31,
2010 was a negligible loss, compared to a gain of $5.4 million from the comparable prior year
period. Gains recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2009 primarily were attributable
to the disposition of Colonial Promenade Fultondale, a retail development, and a land outparcel at
Colonial Promenade Tannehill.
Income taxes and other
Income taxes and other for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was an expense of $0.2
million, compared to an income tax benefit of $3.1 million in the comparable prior year period.
Our provision for income taxes was $0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
and our effective income tax rate was 0% for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. The
income tax benefit of $3.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 is offset by income
tax expense of $3.2 million included in Gain on Sale of Property, net of income taxes.
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
(Loss) income from discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was a
loss of $0.1 million, compared to income of $0.6 million from the comparable prior year period. At
March 31, 2010, there were no operating properties classified as held for sale, nor were there
disposals during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following discussion relates to changes in cash due to operating, investing and financing
activities, which are presented in each of the Trusts and CRLPs Consolidated Condensed Statements
of Cash Flows contained in this Form 10-Q.
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 increased
$3.3 million, to $21.0 million from $17.7 million for the prior year period for each of the Trust
and CRLP. The increase was due primarily to the effect of the completed acquisitions of two
commercial assets and the consolidation of one multifamily asset in 2009, as well as additional
expense savings both in corporate overhead and overhead associated with our property management
activities. For the remainder of 2010, we expect cash flows from operating activities to be
slightly higher than 2009 primarily driven by the acquisitions discussed above and supplemented by
any growth we are able to generate in our multifamily portfolio.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $7.0
million compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $7.5 million for the comparable
prior year period for each of the Trust and CRLP. The change primarily is the result of a
significantly reduced level of disposition activity, resulting in a decrease in proceeds from
property sales when compared to the first quarter of 2009, partially offset by postponement of
developments, as previously discussed. As we explore growth through potential acquisitions and
developments, our cash flow used for investing activities could significantly increase.
52
Table of Contents
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 decreased
$10.0 million, to $14.8 million from $24.8 million for the comparable prior year period for each of
the Trust and CRLP. The change for both the Trust and CRLP was primarily attributable to a $0.10
per share reduction in dividend payments when compared to the prior year and a reduction in debt
payments due to repurchases of unsecured senior notes of CRLP. Given our availability under our
unsecured credit facility, remaining availability under our $50.0 million at-the-market equity
offering program, limited debt maturities in 2010, our large number of unencumbered multifamily
properties and our projected asset sales, we expect to have adequate liquidity to execute our
previously discussed 2010 business strategy.
Credit Ratings
As of March 31, 2010, our current credit ratings are as follows:
Rating Agency | Rating | Last update | ||||||
Fitch |
BB+(1) | May 29, 2009 | ||||||
Moodys |
Ba1(2) | March 30, 2010 | ||||||
Standard & Poors |
BB+(1) | March 18, 2010 |
(1) | Ratings outlook is stable. | |
(2) | Ratings outlook is negative. |
In March 2010, Moodys Investor Service (Moodys) and Standard & Poors reaffirmed our
2009 ratings of Ba1 and BB+, respectively. In March 2009, Moodys and Standard & Poors lowered
their credit ratings on our senior unsecured debt, resulting in an increase in the pricing under
our credit facility to LIBOR plus 105 points from LIBOR plus 75 points. See below for further
discussion on the effects of credit rating downgrades on our ability to access the credit and
capital markets.
Short-Term Liquidity Needs
Our short-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds necessary to pay for
operating expenses directly associated with our portfolio of properties (including regular
maintenance items), capital expenditures incurred to lease our space (e.g., tenant improvements and
leasing commissions), interest expense and scheduled principal payments on our outstanding debt,
and quarterly distributions that we pay to the Trusts common and preferred shareholders and
holders of partnership units in CRLP. In the past, we have primarily satisfied these requirements
through cash generated from operations and borrowings under our unsecured credit facility.
The majority of our revenue is derived from residents and tenants under existing leases,
primarily at our multifamily apartment communities. Therefore, our operating cash flow is
dependent upon the rents that we are able to charge to our residents and tenants, and the ability
of these residents and tenants to make their rental payments. The weak economy and job market in
the U.S. has resulted in increased supply and deterioration in the multifamily market generally,
and has adversely affected our ability to lease our multifamily apartment communities as well as
the rents we are able to charge and thereby adversely affected our revenues.
We believe that cash generated from dispositions of assets, borrowings under our credit
facility, net proceeds of our $50.0 million at-the-market equity offering program and cash
generated from operations, will be sufficient to meet our short-
term liquidity requirements. However, factors described below and elsewhere herein may have a
material adverse effect on our future cash flow.
We have made an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), commencing with our taxable year ending December 31,
1993. If we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to Federal income tax
to the extent we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to the Trusts shareholders.
Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state and local taxes on
our income and property and to federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed income.
53
Table of Contents
Long-Term Liquidity Needs
Our long-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds necessary to pay the principal
amount of our long-term debt as it matures, significant capital expenditures that need to be made
at our properties, development projects that we undertake and costs associated with acquisitions of
properties that we pursue. Historically, we have satisfied these requirements principally through
the most advantageous source of capital at that time, which has included the incurrence of new debt
through borrowings (through public offerings of unsecured debt and private incurrence of
collateralized and unsecured debt), sales of common and preferred shares, capital raised through
the disposition of assets and joint venture capital transactions.
The Trust has filed a registration statement with the SEC allowing us to offer, from time to
time, equity securities of the Trust (including common or preferred shares) for an aggregate
initial public offering price of up to $500 million on an as-needed basis subject to our ability to
affect offerings on satisfactory terms based on prevailing conditions. As described herein, during
the three months ended March 31, 2010, management issued 2,499,518 common shares through our
at-the-market equity offering program generating aggregate net proceeds of $32.4 million. The
proceeds were used to repay a portion of our unsecured credit facility and for general corporate
purposes. Pursuant to the CRLPs Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership,
each time the Trust issues common shares pursuant to the foregoing program, CRLP issues to the
Trust, its general partner, an equal number of units for the same price at which the common shares
were sold.
Our ability to raise funds through sales of common shares and preferred shares in the future
is dependent on, among other things, general market conditions for REITs, market perceptions about
our company and the current trading price of our shares. The financial and economic crisis and
deterioration in the stock and credit markets since mid-2008 have resulted in significant price
volatility, which have caused market prices of many stocks, including the price of the Trusts
common shares, to fluctuate substantially. With respect to both debt and equity, a prolonged
downturn in the financial markets may cause us to seek alternative sources of potentially less
attractive financing, and may require us to adjust our business plan accordingly. These events also
may make it more difficult or costly for us to raise capital through the issuance of the Trusts
common shares, preferred shares or subordinated notes or through private financings. We will
continue to analyze which source of capital is most advantageous to us at any particular point in
time, but the equity and credit markets may not be consistently available on terms that are
attractive.
Our ability to incur additional debt is dependent upon a number of factors, including our
credit ratings, the value of our assets, our degree of leverage and borrowing restrictions imposed
by our current lenders. As discussed above in Credit Ratings, in 2009, we received credit rating
downgrades, reducing the likelihood that we would be able to access the unsecured public debt
market on terms advantageous to us. Notwithstanding the credit downgrades, during 2009, we were
able to obtain secured financing of $506.4 million, for a 10-year term, through Fannie Mae. The
proceeds from those financings were used to repay a portion of our unsecured credit facility. In
2010, we intend to monitor the unsecured and secured debt markets, including Fannie Mae and/or
Freddie Mac, and as market conditions permit, access borrowings that are advantageous to us.
Our ability to generate cash from asset sales is limited by market conditions and certain
rules applicable to REITs. In the current market, our ability to sell properties to raise cash is
challenging. For example, we may not be able to sell a property or properties as quickly as we
have in the past or on terms as favorable as we have previously received. During the three months
ended March 31, 2010, we sold assets for aggregate proceeds of approximately $2.1 million ($1.5
million from the sale of consolidated assets and $0.6 million, which is our pro-rata share, from
the sale of an unconsolidated land parcel). The proceeds from the asset sales were used to repay a
portion of outstanding borrowings under our unsecured credit facility.
At March 31, 2010, our total outstanding debt balance was $1.67 billion. The outstanding
balance includes fixed-rate debt of $1.35 billion, or 80.8% of the total debt balance, and
floating-rate debt of $325.9 million, or 19.2% of the total debt
balance. As further discussed below, at March 31, 2010, we had an unsecured revolving credit
facility providing for total borrowings of up to $675.0 million and a cash management line
providing for borrowings up to $35.0 million.
Distributions
The distribution on the Trusts common shares and CRLPs common units payable on May 17, 2010
to holders of record on May 10, 2010, is $0.15 per share. We also pay regular quarterly
distributions on preferred shares in the Trust and on preferred units in CRLP. The maintenance of
these distributions is subject to various factors, including the discretion of the Trusts Board of
Trustees, the Trusts ability to pay dividends under Alabama law, the availability of cash to make
the necessary dividend payments and the effect of REIT distribution requirements, which require at
least 90% of the Trusts taxable income to be distributed to the Trusts shareholders (excluding
net capital gains).
54
Table of Contents
Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility
As of March 31, 2010, CRLP, with the Trust as guarantor, had a $675.0 million unsecured credit
facility (as amended, the Credit Facility) with Wachovia Bank, National Association (Wachovia),
as Agent for the lenders, Bank of America, N.A. as Syndication Agent, Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, Citicorp North America, Inc. and Regions Bank, as Co-Documentation Agents, and U.S.
Bank National Association and PNC Bank, National Association, as Co-Senior Managing Agents and
other lenders named therein. The Credit Facility has a maturity date of June 21, 2012. In addition
to the Credit Facility, we have a $35.0 million cash management line provided by Wachovia that will
expire on June 21, 2012. The cash management line had an outstanding balance of $7.6 million as of
March 31, 2010.
Base rate loans and revolving loans are available under the Credit Facility. The Credit
Facility also includes a competitive bid feature that allows us to convert up to $337.5 million
under the Credit Facility to a fixed rate and for a fixed term not to exceed 90 days.
Generally, base rate loans bear interest at Wachovias designated base rate, plus a base rate
margin ranging up to 0.25% based on our unsecured debt ratings from time to time. Revolving
loans bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 0.325% to 1.05% based on our unsecured
debt ratings. Competitive bid loans bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin, as specified by the
participating lenders. Based on CRLPs unsecured debt rating downgrade, the revolving loans
currently bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 105 basis points.
The Credit Facility and cash management line, which are primarily used to finance property
acquisitions and developments, and periodically to also fund repurchases of CRLP senior notes and
Series D preferred depositary shares, had an aggregate outstanding balance at March 31, 2010 of
$312.6 million. The interest rate of the Credit Facility, including the cash management line, was
1.29% at March 31, 2010.
The Credit Facility contains various ratios and covenants that are more fully described in
Note 12 to the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements of the Trust and CRLP,
respectively, included in this Form 10-Q. The economic downturn and continued uncertainty in the
stock and credit markets may negatively impact our ability to generate earnings sufficient to
maintain compliance with these ratios and other debt covenants in the future. We expect to be able
to comply with these ratios and covenants in 2010, but no assurance can be given that we will be
able to maintain compliance with these ratios and other debt covenants, particularly if economic
conditions worsen.
As described above, many of the recent disruptions in the financial markets have been brought
about in large part by failures in the U.S. banking system. If Wachovia or any of the other
financial institutions that have extended credit commitments to us under the Credit Facility or
otherwise are adversely affected by the conditions of the financial markets, they may become unable
to fund borrowings under their credit commitments to us under the Credit Facility, the cash
management line or otherwise. If our lenders become unable to fund our borrowings pursuant to
their commitments to us, we may need to obtain replacement financing, and such financing, if
available, may not be available on commercially attractive terms.
Collateralized Credit Facilities
During 2009, we obtained the following secured financing from Fannie Mae:
| In the first quarter of 2009, we closed on a $350 million collateralized credit facility (collateralized with 19 of CRLPs multifamily apartment communities totaling 6,565 units), with a weighted average interest rate of 6.04%, and which matures on March 1, 2019; and |
| In the second quarter of 2009, we closed on a $156.4 million (collateralized credit facility collateralized by eight of CRLPs multifamily apartment communities totaling 2,816 units), with a weighted average interest rate of 5.31%, and which matures on June 1, 2019. |
Under both facilities, accrued interest is required to be paid monthly with no scheduled principal
payments required prior to the maturity date. The proceeds from these financings were used to
repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings under our Credit Facility.
55
Table of Contents
Equity Repurchases
In October 2008, the Trusts Board of Trustees authorized a repurchase program which allowed
the Trust to repurchase up to an additional $25.0 million of its outstanding 8 1/8% Series D
preferred depositary shares over a 12 month period. The Board of Trustees of the Trust, as general
partner of CRLP, also authorized the repurchase of a corresponding amount of Series D Preferred
Units of CRLP. During 2009, the Trust repurchased 6,515 shares of its outstanding 8 1/8% Series D
preferred depositary shares (and CRLP repurchased a corresponding amount of Series D Preferred
Units) in open market transactions for a purchase price of $126,761, or $19.46 per depositary
share. The Trust received a 22.2% discount on the repurchase to the liquidation preference price of
$25.00 per depositary share and wrote off a nominal amount of issuance costs. In the aggregate, the
Trust repurchased $24.1 million of its outstanding 8 1/8% Series D preferred depositary shares (and
CRLP has repurchased a corresponding amount of Series D Preferred Units) under this program, which
expired in late October 2009.
On January 27, 2010, the Trusts Board of Trustees authorized a new preferred securities
repurchase program which allows the Trust to repurchase up to $25 million of its outstanding 8 1/8%
Series D preferred depositary shares. The preferred shares may be repurchased from time to time
over the next 12 months in open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, subject to
applicable legal requirements, market conditions and other factors. This repurchase program does
not obligate the Trust to repurchase any specific amounts of preferred shares, and repurchases
pursuant to the program may be suspended or resumed at any time from time to time without further
notice or announcement. The Trust will continue to monitor the equity markets and repurchase
certain preferred shares that meet the Trusts required criteria, as funds are available. The
Trust did not repurchase any 8 1/8% Series D preferred depositary shares during the three months
ended March 31, 2010.
Unsecured Senior Note Repurchases
During 2009, we repurchased an aggregate of $181.0 million of our outstanding unsecured senior
notes in separate transactions. In addition, during 2009, we completed two separate cash tender
offers for outstanding unsecured senior notes of CRLP. In April 2009, we completed a cash tender
offer for $250 million in aggregate principal amount of outstanding notes maturing in 2010 and
2011, and in September 2009, we completed an additional cash tender offer for $148.2 million in
aggregate principal amount of outstanding notes maturing in 2014, 2015 and 2016. As a result,
during 2009, we repurchased an aggregate of $579.2 million of our outstanding unsecured senior
notes at an aggregate average of 10.6% discount to par value, which represents an 8.1% yield to
maturity. As a result of the repurchases, during 2009, we recognized net gains of approximately
$54.7 million, which is included in Gains on retirement of debt on our Consolidated Statements of
Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
On January 27, 2010, the Trusts Board of Trustees authorized a new unsecured notes repurchase
program which allows for the repurchase of up to $100 million of outstanding unsecured senior notes
of CRLP. This new repurchase program runs through December 31, 2010. Under this program, senior
notes may be repurchased from time to time in open market transactions or privately negotiated
transactions, subject to applicable legal requirements, market conditions and other factors. The
repurchase program does not obligate the repurchase of any specific amounts of senior notes, and
repurchases pursuant to the program may be suspended or resumed at any time from time to time
without further notice or announcement. We will continue to monitor the debt markets and repurchase
certain senior notes that meet our required criteria, as funds are available. We anticipate funding
potential repurchases from borrowings under our existing credit facility, proceeds from property
sales and/or other available funds.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we repurchased $8.7 million in unsecured senior
notes, at a 1% discount to par value, which represents a 6.51% yield to maturity and resulted in
the recognition of negligible net gains.
Contingencies
We are involved in a contract dispute with a general contractor in connection with
construction costs and cost overruns with respect to certain of our for-sale projects, which are
being developed in a joint venture in which we are a majority owner. The contractor is affiliated
with our joint venture partner.
| In connection with the dispute, in January 2008, the contractor filed a lawsuit against us alleging, among other things, breach of contract, enforcement of a lien against real property, misrepresentation, conversion, declaratory judgment and an accounting of costs, and is seeking $10.3 million in damages, plus consequential and punitive damages. |
| Certain of the subcontractors, vendors and other parties, involved in the projects, including purchasers of units, have also made claims in the form of lien claims, general claims or lawsuits. We have been sued by purchasers of certain condominium units alleging breach of contract, fraud, construction deficiencies and misleading sales practices. Both compensatory and punitive damages are sought in these actions. Some of these claims have been resolved by negotiations and mediations, and others may also be similarly resolved. Some of these claims will likely be arbitrated or litigated to conclusion. |
56
Table of Contents
We are continuing to evaluate our options and investigate certain of these claims, including
possible claims against the contractor and other parties. We intend to vigorously defend ourselves
against these claims. However, no prediction of the likelihood, or amount, of any resulting loss
or recovery can be made at this time and no assurance can be given that the matter will be resolved
favorably.
In connection with certain retail developments, we have received funding from municipalities
for infrastructure costs. In most cases, the municipalities issue bonds that are repaid primarily
from sales tax revenues generated from the tenants at each respective development. We have
guaranteed the shortfall, if any, of tax revenues to the debt service requirements on the bonds.
The total amount outstanding on these bonds is approximately $13.5 million at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, no liability was recorded for these
guarantees.
As a result of transactions executed in 2007, we implemented our strategic initiative to
become a multifamily focused REIT, which included two significant joint venture transactions
whereby the majority of our wholly-owned commercial properties were transferred into separate joint
ventures. In December 2009, we disposed of our interest in one of these joint ventures but continue
to retain its interest in the other joint venture. In connection with the 2007 joint venture
transactions, we assumed certain contingent obligations for a total of $15.7 million, of which $6.1
million remains outstanding as of March 31, 2010.
As of March 31, 2010, we are self-insured up to $0.8 million, $1.0 million and $1.8 million
for general liability, workers compensation and property insurance, respectively. We are also
self insured for health insurance and responsible for amounts up to $135,000 per claim and up to
$2.0 million per person.
We are a party to various other legal proceedings incidental to its business. In the opinion
of management, after consultation with legal counsel, the ultimate liability, if any, with respect
to those proceedings is not presently expected to materially affect our financial position or
results of operations or cash flows.
Guarantees and Other Arrangements
With respect to the Colonial Grand at Traditions joint venture, we and our joint venture
partner each committed to a partial loan repayment guarantee of $3.5 million of the principal
amount of a $34.1 million construction loan obtained by the joint venture, for a total guarantee of
$7.0 million of the principal amount. As further described below under Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements, the loan matured on April 15, 2010, but has not been repaid by the joint venture.
With respect to the Colonial Promenade Smyrna joint venture, we and our joint venture partner
each committed to guarantee up to $8.65 million, for an aggregate of up to $17.3 million, of a
$34.6 million construction loan obtained by the Colonial Promenade Smyrna joint venture. As
further described below under Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, the loan matured in December 2009,
but has not been repaid by the joint venture.
In connection with the formation of Highway 150 LLC in 2002, we executed a guarantee, pursuant
to which we serve as a guarantor of $1.0 million of the debt related to the joint venture, which is
collateralized by the Colonial Promenade Hoover retail property. Our maximum guarantee of $1.0
million may be requested by the lender only after all of the rights and
remedies available under the associated note and security agreements have been exercised and
exhausted. At March 31, 2010, the total amount of debt of the joint venture was approximately
$16.0 million and the debt matures in December 2012. At March 31, 2010, no liability was recorded
for the guarantee.
In connection with the contribution of certain assets to CRLP, certain partners of CRLP have
guaranteed indebtedness totaling $21.2 million at March 31, 2010. The guarantees are held in order
for the contributing partners to maintain their tax deferred status on the contributed assets.
These individuals have not been indemnified by us.
As discussed above, in connection with certain retail developments, we have received funding
from municipalities for infrastructure costs. In most cases, the municipalities issue bonds that
are repaid primarily from sales tax revenues generated from the tenants at each respective
development. We have guaranteed the shortfall, if any, of tax revenues to the debt service
requirements on the bonds.
57
Table of Contents
The fair value of the above guarantees could change in the near term if the markets in which
these properties are located deteriorate or if there are other negative indicators.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At March 31, 2010, our pro-rata share of mortgage debt of unconsolidated joint ventures is
$238.4 million.
The aggregate maturities of this mortgage debt are as follows:
(in millions) | ||||
2010 |
$ | 68.3 | ||
2011 |
0.1 | |||
2012 |
2.0 | |||
2013 |
6.1 | |||
Thereafter |
161.9 | |||
$ | 238.4 | |||
Of this debt, $6.3 million and $2.0 million for years 2010 and 2012, respectively, includes an
option for at least a one-year extension. We intend to cooperate with our joint venture partners
in connection with their efforts to refinance and/or replace debt, which cooperation may include
additional capital contributions from time to time in connection therewith.
During April 2007, we and our joint venture partner each committed to a partial loan repayment
guarantee of $3.5 million of the principal amount of a $34.1 million construction loan obtained by
the Colonial Grand at Traditions joint venture, for a total guarantee of $7.0 million of the
principal amount. Construction at this site has been completed and the project was placed into
service during 2008. In late September 2009, we determined it was probable that we would have to
fund the partial loan repayment guarantee provided on the original construction loan. Accordingly,
on September 30, 2009, $3.5 million was recorded for the guarantee. As of March 31, 2010, the
joint venture had drawn $33.4 million on the construction loan, which matured by its terms on April
15, 2010. The estimated fair market value of the property in the joint venture is significantly
less than the principal amount outstanding on this loan. To date, the joint venture has not repaid
the outstanding principal amount due on the construction loan. The joint venture, including us and
our joint venture partner, and the lender have engaged in discussions in an attempt to reach a
mutually acceptable arrangement with respect to the outstanding loan. However, the parties have
been unsuccessful in negotiating a mutually acceptable arrangement with respect to the outstanding
loan. The lender has made a demand on the joint venture for the outstanding balance under the
loan. The lender has also made a demand on us for the $3.5 million guarantee payment, together
with outstanding interest on the loan (which as of April 16, 2010 was approximately $0.05 million).
No assurance can be given that we or the joint venture will be able to reach a mutually
satisfactory resolution of this dispute with the lender.
During November 2006, we and our joint venture partner each committed to guarantee up to $8.65
million, for an aggregate of up to $17.3 million, of a $34.6 million construction loan obtained by
the Colonial Promenade Smyrna joint venture. We and our joint venture partner each committed to
provide 50% of the $17.3 million guarantee, as each partner has a 50% ownership interest in the
joint venture. Construction at this site was completed in 2008. The guarantee provided, among
other things, for a reduction in the guarantee amount in the event the property achieves and
maintains a 1.15 debt service charge. Accordingly, the guarantee has been reduced to $4.3 million.
As of March 31, 2010, the Colonial Promenade Smyrna
joint venture had $28.2 million outstanding on the construction loan, which matured by its
terms in December 2009. The joint venture is currently in negotiations with the lender with
respect to its options. At March 31, 2010, no liability was recorded for the guarantee. See Note
15 to the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements of the Trust and CRLP included in
this Form 10-Q, for additional details.
There can be no assurance that our joint ventures will be successful in refinancing and/or
replacing existing debt at maturity or otherwise. If the joint ventures are unable to obtain
additional financing, payoff the existing loans that are maturing, or renegotiate suitable terms
with the existing lenders, the lenders generally would have the right to foreclose on the
properties in question and, accordingly, the joint ventures will lose their interests in the
assets. The failure to refinance and/or replace such debt and other factors with respect to our
joint venture interests discussed in Item 1A: Risk Factors of the 2009 Form 10-K may materially
adversely impact the value of our joint venture interests, which, in turn, could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
58
Table of Contents
Under these unconsolidated joint venture non-recourse mortgage loans, we could, under certain
circumstances, be responsible for portions of the mortgage indebtedness in connection with certain
customary non-recourse carve-out provisions, such as environmental conditions, misuse of funds, and
material misrepresentations. In addition, as more fully described above, we have made certain
guarantees in connection with our investment in unconsolidated joint ventures. We do not have any
other off-balance sheet arrangements with any unconsolidated investments or joint ventures that we
believe have or are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, results
of operations, liquidity or capital resources.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Please refer to the 2009 Form 10-K for discussions of our critical accounting policies, which
include principles of consolidation; land, buildings and equipment (including impairment);
acquisition of real estate assets; undeveloped land and construction in progress; valuation of
receivables; notes receivable; deferred debt and lease costs; derivative instruments; share-based
compensation; revenue recognition; segment reporting; investments in joint ventures; investment and
development expenses; assets and liabilities at fair value; and recent accounting pronouncements.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, there were no material changes to these policies.
The adoption of ASC 810-10-30, Initial Measurement, which amends the manner in which entities
evaluate whether consolidation is required for variable interest entities (VIEs), did not have a
material impact on our consolidated condensed financial statements. See Note 2 to the Notes to
Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements of the Trust and CRLP included in this Form 10-Q for
additional details.
Derivatives and Hedging
Our objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and
to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, we primarily use
interest rate swaps and caps as part of our interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate
swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a
counterparty in exchange for us making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without
exchange of the underlying notional amount. Interest rate caps designated as cash flow hedges
involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rise above the
strike rate on the contract in exchange for an upfront premium.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and that
qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss on the
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period
that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. We did not have any active cash flow
hedges during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
At March 31, 2010, we had $2.8 million in Accumulated other comprehensive loss related to
settled or terminated derivatives. Amounts reported in Accumulated other comprehensive loss
related to derivatives will be reclassified to Interest expense as interest payments are made on
our variable-rate debt or to Loss on hedging activities at such time that the interest payments
on the hedged debt become probable of not occurring as a result of our senior note repurchase
program. The changes in Accumulated other comprehensive loss for reclassifications to Interest
expense tied to interest payments on the hedged debt was $0.1 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. The changes in Accumulated other comprehensive loss for
reclassification to Loss on hedging activities related to interest payments on the hedged debt
that have been deemed probable not to occur as a result of our senior note repurchase program was
$1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage our exposure
to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the strict hedge accounting
requirements. As of March 31, 2010, we had no derivatives that were not designated as a hedge in a
qualifying hedging relationship.
Inflation
Leases at the multifamily properties generally provide for an initial term of six months to
one year and allow for rent adjustments at the time of renewal. Leases at the office properties
typically provide for rent adjustments and the pass-through of certain operating expenses during
the term of the lease. Substantially all of the leases at the retail properties provide for the
pass-through to tenants of certain operating costs, including real estate taxes, common area
maintenance expenses, and insurance. All of these provisions permit us to increase rental rates or
other charges to tenants in response to rising prices and, therefore, serve to minimize our
exposure to the adverse effects of inflation.
59
Table of Contents
An increase in general price levels may immediately precede, or accompany, an increase in
interest rates. At March 31, 2010, our exposure to rising interest rates was mitigated by our
high percentage of consolidated fixed rate debt of 80.8%, which is consistent with our
percentage as of December 31, 2009. As it relates to the short-term, an increase in interest
expense resulting from increasing inflation is anticipated to be less than future increases in
income before interest.
Funds From Operations
Funds from Operations (FFO), as defined by the National Association of Real Estate
Investment Trusts (NAREIT), means income (loss) before noncontrolling interest (determined in
accordance with GAAP), excluding sales of depreciated property, plus real estate depreciation and
after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. FFO is presented to assist
investors in analyzing our performance. We believe that FFO is useful to investors because it
provides an additional indicator of our financial and operating performance. This is because, by
excluding the effect of real estate depreciation and gains (or losses) from sales of properties
(all of which are based on historical costs which may be of limited relevance in evaluating current
performance), FFO can facilitate comparison of operating performance among equity REITs. FFO is a
widely recognized measure in our industry. We believe that the line on our consolidated statement
of operations entitled net income available to common shareholders is the most directly
comparable GAAP measure to FFO. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly
assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate
values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors
and analysts have considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use
historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. Thus, NAREIT created FFO as a
supplemental measure of REIT operating performance that excludes historical cost depreciation,
among other items, from GAAP net income. Management believes that the use of FFO, combined with the
required primary GAAP presentations, has been fundamentally beneficial, improving the understanding
of operating results of REITs among the investing public and making comparisons of REIT operating
results more meaningful. In addition to company management evaluating the operating performance of
our reportable segments based on FFO results, management uses FFO and FFO per share, along with
other measures, to assess performance in connection with evaluating and granting incentive
compensation to key employees. Our method of calculating FFO may be different from methods used by
other REITs and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other REITs. FFO should not be
considered (1) as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP), (2) as an
indicator of financial performance, (3) as cash flow from operating activities (determined in
accordance with GAAP) or (4) as a measure of liquidity nor is it indicative of sufficient cash flow
to fund all of our needs, including our ability to make distributions.
60
Table of Contents
The following information is provided to reconcile net income available to common shareholders
of the Trust, the most comparable GAAP measure, to FFO, and to show the items included in our FFO
for the periods indicated.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands, except per share and unit data) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Net (loss) income available to common shareholders |
$ | (12,329 | ) | $ | 13,875 | |||
Noncontrolling interest in CRLP |
(1,500 | ) | 2,531 | |||||
Noncontrolling interest in gain on sale of undepreciated property |
| 992 | ||||||
Total |
$ | (13,829 | ) | $ | 17,398 | |||
Adjustments (consolidated): |
||||||||
Real estate depreciation |
29,821 | 27,408 | ||||||
Real estate amortization |
1,741 | 342 | ||||||
Consolidated gains from sales of property, net of income tax
and noncontrolling interest |
42 | (5,425 | ) | |||||
Gains from sales of undepreciated property, net of income tax
and noncontrolling interest (1) |
(10 | ) | 3,731 | |||||
Adjustments (unconsolidated subsidiaries): |
||||||||
Real estate depreciation |
2,408 | 4,785 | ||||||
Real estate amortization |
702 | 1,814 | ||||||
Gains from sales of property |
(78 | ) | 19 | |||||
Funds from operations (2) |
$ | 20,797 | $ | 50,072 | ||||
Income allocated to participating securities |
(182 | ) | (324 | ) | ||||
Funds from Operations available to common shareholders and unitholders |
$ | 20,615 | $ | 49,748 | ||||
FFO per Share (2) |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.28 | $ | 0.87 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.28 | $ | 0.87 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
66,426 | 48,202 | ||||||
Weighted average partnership units outstanding basic (3) |
8,157 | 8,823 | ||||||
Weighted average shares and units outstanding basic |
74,583 | 57,025 | ||||||
Effect of diluted securities |
| | ||||||
Weighted average shares and units outstanding diluted |
74,583 | 57,025 | ||||||
(1) | We recognize incremental gains on condominium sales in FFO, net of provision for income taxes, to the extent that net sales proceeds, less costs of sales, from the sale of condominium units exceeds the greater of their fair value or net book value as of the date the property is acquired by our taxable REIT subsidiary. | |
(2) | FFO for the three months ended March 31, 2009 includes $1.0 million non-cash impairment charges, which is equivalent to $0.02 per basic and diluted share, respectively. | |
(3) | Represents the weighted average of outstanding units of noncontrolling interest in Colonial Realty Limited Partnership. |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
As of March 31, 2010, we had approximately $325.9 million of outstanding variable rate debt.
We do not believe that the interest rate risk represented by our variable rate debt is material in
relation to our $1.7 billion of outstanding total debt and our $3.1 billion of total assets as of
March 31, 2010.
If market rates of interest on our variable rate debt increase by 1%, the increase in annual
interest expense on our variable rate debt would decrease annual future earnings and cash flows by
approximately $3.3 million. If market rates of interest on our variable rate debt decrease by 1%,
the decrease in interest expense on our variable rate debt would increase future earnings and cash
flows by approximately $3.3 million. This assumes that the amount outstanding under our variable
rate debt remains approximately $325.9 million, the balance as of March 31, 2010.
As of March 31, 2010, we had no material exposure to market risk (including foreign currency
exchange risk, commodity price risk or equity price risk).
61
Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) | Disclosure controls and procedures. |
The Company has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form
10-Q. An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of
management, including the Companys chief executive officer and chief financial officer, on
behalf of both the Trust and CRLP, of the effectiveness as of March 31, 2010 of the design and
operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-15. Based on that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer
concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
(b) | Changes in internal control over financial reporting. |
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15) that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal
control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the risk factors contained in the 2009 Form 10-K and the
descriptions included in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes before making
an investment decision regarding our Company. The risks and uncertainties described herein and in
the 2009 Form 10-K are not the only ones facing us and there may be additional risks that we do not
presently know of or that we currently consider not likely to have a significant impact. All of
these risks could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows. In addition to the risks identified in the 2009 Form 10-K, we are also subject to the
following additional risk:
A large number of shares available for future sale could adversely affect the market price of
our common shares and may be dilutive to current shareholders.
The sales of a substantial number of our common shares, or the perception that such sales
could occur, could adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common shares. As of March 31,
2010 there were 125,000,000 common shares authorized under our Declaration of Trust, as amended, of
which 69,306,734 were outstanding. Our Board of Trustees may authorize the issuance of additional
authorized but unissued common shares or other authorized but unissued securities at any time,
including pursuant to share option and share purchase plans. In addition to issuances of shares
pursuant to share option and share purchase plans, as of March 31, 2010, we may issue up to
8,151,740 common shares upon redemption of currently outstanding units of our operating
partnership. We also have filed a registration statement with the SEC allowing us to offer, from
time to time, equity securities (including common or preferred shares) for an aggregate initial
public offering price of up to $500 million on an as-needed basis and subject to our ability to
affect offerings on satisfactory terms based on prevailing conditions. As of March 31, 2010, we had
issued an aggregate of $191.7 million in common shares under this registration statement, including
$33.1 million under our $50.0 million at-the-market equity offering program. Our ability to
execute our business strategy depends on our access to an appropriate blend of debt financing,
including unsecured lines of credit and other forms of secured and unsecured debt, and equity
financing, including issuances of common and preferred equity. No prediction can be made about the
effect that future distribution or sales of our common shares will have on the market price of our
common shares.
62
Table of Contents
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
A summary of repurchases by the Trust of common shares of the Trust for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 is as follows:
Shares Purchased as | Maximum Number of | |||||||||||||||
Part of Publicly | Shares that may yet be | |||||||||||||||
Total Number of Shares | Average Price Paid | Announced Plans or | Purchased Under the | |||||||||||||
Purchased (1) | per Share | Programs | Plans | |||||||||||||
January 1 -
January 31, 2010 |
1,085 | $ | 12.16 | | | |||||||||||
February 1 -
February 28, 2010 |
16 | $ | 11.80 | | | |||||||||||
March 1 -
March 31, 2010 |
177 | $ | 13.30 | | | |||||||||||
Total |
1,278 | $ | 12.31 | | | |||||||||||
(1) | Represents the number of shares acquired by us from employees as payment of applicable statutory minimum withholding taxes owed upon vesting of restricted stock granted under our Third Amended and Restated Share Option and Restricted Share Plan or our 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Whenever the Trust purchases or redeems its preferred and common shares, CRLP purchases, redeems or cancels an equivalent number of preferred or common units. Accordingly, during the three months ended March 31, 2010, CRLP acquired an equal number of common units corresponding to the number of common shares listed in the Table above. |
The Trust from time to time issues common shares pursuant to its Direct Investment Program,
its Non-Employee Trustee Share Option Plan, its Non-Employee Trustee Share Plan, its Employee Share
Option and Restricted Share Plan, and its 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan in transactions that are
registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Act). Pursuant to CRLPs Third
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership, as amended (the Partnership Agreement),
each time the Trust issues common shares pursuant to the foregoing plans, CRLP issues to the Trust,
its general partner, an equal number of units for the same price at which the common shares were
sold, in transactions that are not registered under the Act in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Act
due to the fact that units were issued only to the Trust and therefore, did not involve a public
offering. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, CRLP issued 428,440 common units to the
Trust for direct investments and other issuances under employee and nonemployee plans for an
aggregate of approximately $4.3 million.
The Trust has also issued common shares under its $50.0 million at-the-market equity
offering program that are registered under the Act. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, each
time the Trust issues common shares pursuant to this program, CRLP issues to the Trust an equal
number of units for the same price at which the common shares were sold, in transactions that are
not registered under the Act in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Act due to the fact that units were
issued only to the Trust and therefore, did not involve a public offering. During the three months
ended March 31, 2010, CRLP issued 2,499,518 common units to the Trust for shares issued under the
Trusts at-the-market equity offering program for an aggregate of approximately $32.4 million of
net proceeds.
Item 6. Exhibits
The exhibits required by this Item are set forth on the Index of Exhibits attached hereto.
63
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each of the registrants
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
COLONIAL PROPERTIES TRUST | ||||||||
Date: May 7, 2010 | By: | /s/ C. Reynolds Thompson, III | ||||||
C. Reynolds Thompson, III | ||||||||
President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||||||
Date: May 7, 2010 | By: | /s/ Bradley P. Sandidge | ||||||
Bradley P. Sandidge | ||||||||
Executive Vice President, Accounting | ||||||||
COLONIAL REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, | ||||||||
A Delaware limited partnership | ||||||||
By: | Colonial Properties Trust Its General Partner |
|||||||
Date: May 7, 2010 | By: | /s/ C. Reynolds Thompson, III | ||||||
C. Reynolds Thompson, III | ||||||||
President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||||||
Date: May 7, 2010 | By: | /s/ Bradley P. Sandidge | ||||||
Bradley P. Sandidge | ||||||||
Executive Vice President, Accounting |
64
Table of Contents
Index of Exhibits
Page | ||||||||
10.1 | Summary of the 2010 Annual Incentive Plan of the Trust
|
Filed herewith | Page 66 | |||||
10.2 | Equity Distribution Agreement, dated March 4, 2010,
by and among the Company, the Operating Partnership
and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated, as Agent
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 5, 2010 | | |||||
10.3 | Equity Distribution Agreement, dated March 4, 2010,
by and among the Company, the Operating Partnership
and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as Agent
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 5, 2010 | | |||||
12.1 | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and
to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Share
Distributions for the Trust
|
Filed herewith | Page 68 | |||||
12.2 | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges for
CRLP
|
Filed herewith | Page 69 | |||||
31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the
Trust required by Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
|
Filed herewith | Page 70 | |||||
31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the
Trust required by Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
|
Filed herewith | Page 71 | |||||
31.3 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the
Trust, in its capacity as general partner of CRLP,
required by Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
|
Filed herewith | Page 72 | |||||
31.4 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the
Trust, in its capacity as general partner of CRLP,
required by Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
|
Filed herewith | Page 73 | |||||
32.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the
Trust required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
|
Filed herewith | Page 74 | |||||
32.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the
Trust required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
|
Filed herewith | Page 75 | |||||
32.3 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the
Trust, in its capacity as general partner of CRLP,
required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
|
Filed herewith | Page 76 | |||||
32.4 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the
Trust, in its capacity as general partner of CRLP,
required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
|
Filed herewith | Page 77 |
65