Attached files

file filename
EX-23 - EX-23 - JO-ANN STORES INCl39367exv23.htm
EX-21 - EX-21 - JO-ANN STORES INCl39367exv21.htm
EX-24 - EX-24 - JO-ANN STORES INCl39367exv24.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - JO-ANN STORES INCl39367exv31w1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - JO-ANN STORES INCl39367exv31w2.htm
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - JO-ANN STORES INCl39367exv32w1.htm
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 
 
 
Form 10-K
 
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the fiscal year-ended January 30, 2010
 
Commission File No. 1-6695
 
 
 
 
JO-ANN STORES, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
 
     
Ohio
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  34-0720629
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
     
5555 Darrow Road, Hudson, Ohio
(Address of principal executive offices)
  44236
(Zip Code)
 
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(330) 656-2600
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
     
Title of Each Class
 
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
 
Common Shares, Without Par Value
Common Share Purchase Rights
  New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
 
 
 
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes  o     No  þ
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes  o     No  þ
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  þ     No  o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes o     No o
 
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
             
Large accelerated filer o
  Accelerated filer þ   Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.):  Yes o     No þ
 
The aggregate market value of the common stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of August 1, 2009 was $570.6 million, based upon the closing sales price of the registrant’s common stock on that date as reported on the New York Stock Exchange. All executive officers and directors of the registrant have been deemed, solely for the purpose of the foregoing calculation, to be “affiliates” of the registrant.
 
The number of the registrant’s Common Shares outstanding, as of April 1, 2010, was 27,311,007.
 
Documents incorporated by reference: Portions of the following documents are incorporated by reference:
 
Proxy Statement for 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders — Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III.
 


 

 
PART I
 
Except as otherwise stated, the information contained in this report is given as of January 30, 2010, the end of our latest fiscal year. The words “Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.,” “Jo-Ann Stores,” “Jo-Ann Fabrics and Crafts,” “Jo-Ann Fabric and Craft Stores,” “Joann.com,” “Registrant,” “company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. and, unless the context requires otherwise, to our subsidiaries. Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. is an Ohio corporation, founded in 1943. Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31 and refers to the year in which the period ends (e.g., fiscal 2010 refers to the period ended January 30, 2010). Fiscal years consist of 52 weeks, unless noted otherwise.
 
Item 1.  Business
 
We are the nation’s largest specialty retailer of fabrics and one of the largest specialty retailers of crafts, serving customers in their pursuit of apparel and craft sewing, crafting, home decorating and other creative endeavors. Our retail stores (operating as Jo-Ann Fabric and Craft stores and Jo-Ann stores) and website (www.Joann.com) feature a variety of competitively priced merchandise used in sewing, crafting and home decorating projects, including fabrics, notions, crafts, frames, paper crafting material, artificial floral, home accents, finished seasonal and home décor merchandise.
 
We consider stores that generally average more than approximately 24,000 square feet of retail space as large-format stores. Our small-format stores generally average less than approximately 24,000 square feet. The size of the store is not the only factor in determining its classification as large-format or small-format. The most important distinction for determining the classification of a large-format store is whether or not stores in the range have been recently built or remodeled and contain a broad assortment of craft categories.
 
As of January 30, 2010, we operated 746 stores in 48 states (518 small-format stores and 228 large-format stores). Our small-format stores offer a complete selection of fabric and a convenience assortment of crafts, artificial floral, finished seasonal and home décor merchandise. They average approximately 14,700 square feet and generated average net sales per store of approximately $1.7 million in fiscal 2010. We opened five small-format stores in fiscal 2010. Our large-format stores offer an expanded and more comprehensive product assortment than our small-format stores. Our large-format stores also generally offer custom framing and educational programs that our small-format stores do not. They average approximately 36,500 square feet and generated average net sales per store of approximately $4.7 million in fiscal 2010. We opened 15 large-format stores in fiscal 2010.
 
We provide a one-stop shopping experience for craft and sewing projects under one roof, with employees who are encouraged to advise customers in creating and completing creative projects. Many of our store level employees are sewing and/or crafting enthusiasts, which we believe enables them to provide exceptional customer service. We believe our focus on service contributes to a high proportion of repeat business from our customers.
 
We believe that our large-format stores are uniquely designed to offer a destination location for our customers. We offer approximately 70,000 stock-keeping units (“SKUs”) across two broad product categories: sewing and non-sewing merchandise. We manage our vast product selection with SAP Retail systems. Through the core SAP application and integration with peripheral processing systems, we continue to drive operational improvements and streamline operations. During fiscal 2010, we completed an implementation of the JDA Demand & Fulfillment system, enhancing our merchandise management portfolio of merchandise planning, space planning and product replenishment.
 
Our industry is highly fragmented and is served by multi-store fabric retailers, arts and crafts retailers, mass merchandisers, small local specialty retailers, mail order and Internet vendors and a variety of other retailers. The Craft & Hobby Association estimates that the craft and hobby industry sales in the United States are approximately $30 billion annually.
 
We believe stability in our sales and our industry is partially a function of recession-resistant characteristics. For example, according to a 2009 study conducted by the Craft & Hobby Association, approximately 56 percent of all U.S. households participated in crafts and hobbies, flat compared to the prior year. While


1


 

expenditures for such projects are generally discretionary in nature, our average sales ticket during fiscal 2010 was $23 in our large-format stores and $19 in our small-format stores.
 
Business Strategy
 
The following core objectives serve as the foundation of our operational and merchandising initiatives:
 
  •  Improve the customer shopping experience.  We are committed to improving the customer shopping experience by removing excess inventory and clutter from our stores, raising expectations for store cleanliness, improving our in-stock availability of basic merchandise and improving our customer service.
 
  •  Enhance our marketing and merchandising offers.  We will drive sales growth by enhancing our marketing and merchandising offers. Marketing enhancements include changes in the appearance, content and distribution of our advertising. We will continue to consider new vendor programs. We will continue to improve our plan-o-gram processes in order to offer compelling and fresh product assortments that inspire customers. We will continue to make tighter buys on fashion and seasonal items for faster turns and improved margins.
 
  •  Refine our store development programs.  We will continue to refine our new store programs in order to generate better performance from new stores. In addition, we will continue to refine our remodel programs in order to generate better performance from our small-format stores and older large-format stores.
 
We have completed the following operational and merchandising initiatives, which were developed from our core objectives:
 
  •  Implementation of technology.
 
  •  During fiscal 2009, we completed the implementation of a new point-of-sale and store systems SAP Retail package, including new human resources and workforce management applications. The new package has provided additional functionality for managing markdowns, the ability to offer new promotional capabilities to enhance margins and payroll efficiencies.
 
  •  During fiscal 2010, we completed an implementation of the JDA Demand & Fulfillment system, enhancing our merchandise management portfolio of merchandise planning, space planning and product replenishment.
 
  •  Continued integration of our Joann.com Internet business.   Fiscal 2009 represented our first full year of operations for Joann.com. During fiscal 2010, we improved and enhanced the integration of our Internet business. We expect that full integration of our Internet business will achieve stronger synergies with our retail stores and provide an additional outlet for marketing opportunities.
 
  •  Store remodel and optimization programs.  During fiscal 2009, we re-merchandised approximately 200 of our small-format stores, over and above those we had scheduled for remodels during that year. Our store remodel and optimization programs continued to generate incremental sales. During fiscal 2010, we re-merchandised approximately 180 additional small-format stores. Our core sewing and craft business delivered positive same-store sales, even as the economy was deteriorating during fiscal 2009 and into fiscal 2010.
 
Our current operating priorities also stem from the above objectives:
 
  •  Accelerate new store growth and remodel projects.  During fiscal 2010, we opened 20 stores and remodeled 30 stores. We will increase our new store openings to at least 30 during fiscal 2011. We then expect to increase the number of new store openings by at least 10 stores per year over each of the following four years, for a compounded annual growth rate for retail square footage of about 2.5 percent over the five-year period between fiscal 2011 and 2015. We also plan to increase remodel activity in a similar fashion. We will complete at least 40 remodels during fiscal 2011, plus an incremental 10 projects per year over the following four years. This new store and remodel program will result in


2


 

  95 percent of our store portfolio as either new or remodeled within the past 10 years by the time we complete fiscal 2015.
 
  •  Drive same-store sales.  We intend to achieve this priority by:
 
  •  Rolling out several dynamic new product assortments and merchandising programs;
 
  •  Enhancing in-store presentations;
 
  •  Providing new branded quilt fabrics;
 
  •  Regionalizing fabric assortments;
 
  •  Performing strategic targeted marketing programs; and
 
  •  Focusing on in-store education and demonstrations.
 
  •  Margin expansion.  We continue to believe margin expansion provides a significant opportunity to improve financial results. During fiscal 2010, we achieved margin expansion primarily due to the following:
 
  •  Increased the percentage of products that we source directly from Asia;
 
  •  Product cost deflation on products sourced from Asia;
 
  •  Decreased freight expense as a result of lower oil prices, reducing our cost of sourcing products both globally and domestically;
 
  •  Purchased significantly less fashion and seasonal merchandise in fiscal 2010, reducing our exposure to promotional and clearance markdowns; and
 
  •  Benefited from a full-year impact of the new store systems that we rolled-out during fiscal 2009.
 
During fiscal 2011, we expect further improvements in margin due to continued expansion of direct sourcing of product from overseas and the realization of benefits from operating for a full year on the JDA Demand & Fulfillment system.
 
  •  Enhance management training.  We have developed a new management training program and will continue to expand the program to enhance the skills of our store management teams. We will implement a new performance management system that provides on-line access to performance reviews, compensation management and succession planning. In addition, we will introduce a mystery shopper program to provide independent feedback on store conditions and service, so we can react quickly to address areas of opportunity.
 
  •  Enhance technology.  Projects for fiscal 2011 will focus on rationalizing hardware infrastructure to reduce information technology operating costs. We will update our distribution center hardware and further enhance our point-of-sale and labor management applications.
 
Product Selection
 
The following table shows our net sales by principal product line as a percentage of total net sales:
 
                         
    Fiscal Year-Ended  
    January 30,
    January 31,
    February 2,
 
    2010     2009     2008  
 
Principal product lines:
                       
Sewing
    52 %     51 %     50 %
Non-sewing
    48 %     49 %     50 %
                         
Total
    100 %     100 %     100 %
                         


3


 

Sewing
 
We offer a broad and comprehensive assortment of fabrics and sewing accessories in both our small-format and large-format stores. These fabrics are merchandised by end use and are sourced from throughout the world to offer our customers a combination of unique design, fashion forward trends and value. Our stores are organized in the following categories for the convenience of the sewer:
 
  •  fashion and sportswear fabrics, used primarily in the construction of garments for the customer seeking a unique, fashion forward look;
 
  •  special occasion fabrics used to construct evening wear, bridal and special occasion outfits;
 
  •  craft fabrics used primarily in the construction of quilts, craft and seasonal projects for the home;
 
  •  juvenile designs for the construction of garments, as well as blankets and décor accessories;
 
  •  fleece fabrics in both prints and solids used for the construction of sportswear, blankets and craft projects for the home;
 
  •  home decorating fabrics and accessories used in home related projects such as window treatments, furniture and bed coverings (in addition to the in-store assortment, we offer a special order capability for additional designs);
 
  •  a wide array of notions, which represent items incidental to sewing-related projects — including cutting implements, threads, zippers, trims, tapes, pins, elastics, buttons and ribbons, as well as the patterns necessary for most sewing projects; and
 
  •  sewing-related accessories including lighting, organizers and sewing machines. Our high volume stores offer a wider selection of sewing machines through leased departments with third parties.
 
Non-sewing
 
We offer a broad assortment of non-sewing merchandise for the creative enthusiast. Our large-format stores offer the complete array of categories while our small-format stores, due to their smaller size, carry edited assortments of the best-selling items. We offer the following non-sewing selections in our large-format stores:
 
  •  yarn and accessories, as well as needlecraft kits and supplies;
 
  •  paper crafting components, such as albums, papers, stickers, stamps and books used in the popular home based activities of scrapbooking and card making;
 
  •  craft materials, including items used for stenciling, jewelry making, decorative painting, wall décor, food crafting and kids crafting;
 
  •  fine art materials, including items such as pastels, water colors, oil paints, acrylics, easels, brushes, paper and canvas;
 
  •  a comprehensive assortment of books and magazines to provide inspiration for our customer;
 
  •  framed art, photo albums and ready-made frames and full service in-store custom framing departments;
 
  •  floral products, including artificial flowers, dried flowers and artificial plants, sold separately or in ready-made floral arrangements and a broad selection of accessories essential for floral arranging and wreath making; and
 
  •  home décor accessories including baskets, candles and accent collections designed to complement our home décor fashions.
 
In addition to the basic categories described above, our stores regularly feature seasonal products, which fit with our core merchandising strategy. Our seasonal offerings span all product lines and include finished decorations, gifts and accessories that focus on holidays, as well as seasonal categories such as patio/garden.


4


 

During the Christmas selling season, a significant portion of floor and shelf space is devoted to seasonal crafts, decorating and gift-making merchandise. Due to the project-oriented nature of these items, our peak selling season starts earlier than that of other retailers and generally runs from September through December. In fiscal 2010, approximately 56 percent of our net sales occurred in the third and fourth quarters, and approximately 30 percent occurred in the fourth quarter alone.
 
During fiscal 2010, sewing and non-sewing net sales represented 44 percent and 56 percent of total net sales for our large-format stores, respectively. Sewing and non-sewing net sales represented 62 percent and 38 percent of total net sales for our small-format stores for the same period, respectively.
 
Marketing
 
Our marketing efforts are key to the ongoing success and growth of our sales. Our primary focus is on acquiring and retaining customers through an integrated direct and mass marketing program.
 
We use our proprietary customer database to provide ongoing communication to our best customers through a robust direct mail and e-mail program. This allows us to efficiently and effectively reach our target market on a regular basis throughout the year. To drive customer acquisition, we supplement our direct mail advertising with weekly newspaper insert advertising, primarily in large-format store markets. Our direct mail and newspaper inserts showcase our sales events, feature numerous products offered at competitive prices, and provide inspiration by showcasing customers interacting with our products.
 
As we market the Jo-Ann Stores concept, we also focus on developing long-term relationships with our customers. These efforts include providing inspiration and building knowledge through in-store classes, demonstrations and projects.
 
Our grand opening program plays an integral role in the successful opening of each new store. We utilize our existing customer base to build awareness and excitement in each market around the opening of each new store. This is paired with newspaper inserts, in-store promotions and public relations efforts during the grand opening weekend to drive customer traffic. We continue to drive customer awareness and traffic following grand openings through ongoing advertising efforts in the market.
 
We also reach our customers through our Joann.com e-commerce business. The website was upgraded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, resulting in significantly improved site stability and performance. As part of the upgrade initiative, the site was redesigned and re-launched with improved navigation, a more visually compelling design, and increased emphasis on inspiration through lifestyle imagery used to promote how products might be used.
 
The Jo-Ann online community was also upgraded and re-launched. The upgrade, which took place in the third quarter of fiscal 2010, addressed capacity issues, updated platform software and brought the look, feel and branding of the community into alignment with the e-commerce site. Like the e-commerce site’s re-launch, this community upgrade improved stability and performance for its community members, which grew from 40,000 members at the end of fiscal 2009 (having expanded from approximately 11,500 at the beginning of fiscal 2009) to just over 66,000 members by the closing of fiscal 2010.
 
Social networking is playing an increasingly significant role in marketing, public relations and customer relations for Jo-Ann. Facebook, which was originally utilized as an engagement tool to share inspiration, promote sales, and introduce new products, demonstrated added value during fiscal 2010 as a vehicle for responding to customers when traditional customer service relation channels were experiencing high volume. Facebook fans grew from just under 800 at the start of fiscal 2010 to nearly 15,000 fans by year-end.
 
Purchasing
 
We have numerous domestic and international sources of supply available for each category of product that we sell. During fiscal 2010, approximately 77 percent of our purchases were sourced domestically and 23 percent were sourced internationally. As a percent of purchases, our international sourcing decreased three percent from 26 percent in fiscal 2009, primarily due to our planned reduction in seasonal and fashion


5


 

purchases during fiscal 2010. However, we continue to increase the amount of products we buy directly from factories in Asia, rather than purchasing through domestic agents and/or trading companies. Our domestic suppliers source internationally some of the products they sell to us. Although we have very few long-term purchase commitments with any of our suppliers, we strive to maintain continuity with them. All purchases are centralized through our store support center, allowing store team leaders and store team members to focus on customer sales and service and enabling us to negotiate volume discounts, control product mix and ensure quality. Currently, our top supplier represents approximately three percent of our annual purchase volume and the top ten suppliers represent approximately 23 percent of our total annual purchase volume. We currently utilize approximately 605 merchandise suppliers, with the top 123 representing more than 80 percent of our purchasing volume.
 
Logistics
 
We operate three distribution centers in Hudson, Ohio, Visalia, California and Opelika, Alabama, all of which ship merchandise to our stores on a weekly basis. Based on purchase dollars, approximately 77 percent of the products in our stores are shipped through our distribution center network, with the remaining 23 percent of our purchases shipped directly from our suppliers to our stores. Approximately 45 percent of our store base is supplied from the Hudson distribution center, 28 percent from our Visalia distribution center and 27 percent from our Opelika distribution center.
 
We transport product from our distribution centers to our stores utilizing contract carriers. Merchandise is shipped directly from our distribution centers to our stores using dedicated core carriers for approximately 95 percent of our store base. For the remainder of our chain, we transport product to the stores using less than truckload carriers or through a regional “hub” where product is cross-docked for local delivery. We do not own either the regional hub or the local delivery vehicles.
 
Store Operations
 
Site Selection.  We believe that our store locations are integral to our success. New sites are selected through a coordinated effort of our real estate, finance and operations management teams. In evaluating the desirability of a potential store site, we consider both market demographics and site-specific criteria. Market criteria that we consider important include, but are not limited to, our existing store sales performance in that immediate market, distance to other Jo-Ann store locations, as well as total population, number of households, median household income, percentage of home ownership versus rental, and historical and projected population growth over a ten-year period. Site-specific criteria that we consider important include, but are not limited to, rental terms, the store location, position and visibility within the shopping center, size of the shopping center, co-tenants, proximity to highway access, traffic patterns, availability of convenient parking and ease of entry from the major roadways framing the location.
 
Costs of Opening Stores.  Standard operating procedures are employed to efficiently open new stores and integrate them into our information management and distribution systems. We have developed a standardized floor plan, inventory layout and marketing program for each store that we open. We typically open stores during the period from February through October to maximize sales and to minimize disruption to store operations during our fourth-quarter peak selling season.
 
Store Management.  Small-format stores generally have five full-time team members and 10 to 15 part-time team members, while large-format stores typically have approximately nine full-time team members and 35 to 40 part-time team members. Store team leaders generally are compensated with a base salary plus a bonus, which is tied to quarterly store sales and annual store controllable profit.
 
Our store team leaders typically are promoted from within our assistant manager ranks as a result of their high performance and completion of our internal management training program. Some of our store team leaders started as our customers. This continuity serves to solidify long-standing relationships between our stores and our customers. When a smaller store is closed due to a new larger store opened in the market, we generally retain its team members to staff the new store. Each store is under the supervision of a district team leader who reports to a regional vice president.


6


 

The following table shows our stores by type and state on January 30, 2010:
 
                                                     
    Small-
    Large-
              Small-
    Large-
       
    format     format     Total         format     format     Total  
 
Alabama
    1       1       2     Nebraska     4             4  
Alaska
    4       2       6     Nevada     2       3       5  
Arizona
    3       10       13     New Hampshire     8             8  
Arkansas
    1             1     New Jersey     11       1       12  
California
    59       22       81     New Mexico     6             6  
Colorado
    8       6       14     New York     27       9       36  
Connecticut
    5       5       10     North Carolina     6       1       7  
Delaware
    2       1       3     North Dakota     4             4  
Florida
    28       21       49     Ohio     34       18       52  
Georgia
    6       6       12     Oklahoma     4             4  
Idaho
    7       1       8     Oregon     20       4       24  
Illinois
    21       12       33     Pennsylvania     30       12       42  
Indiana
    18       8       26     Rhode Island           1       1  
Iowa
    10             10     South Carolina     2             2  
Kansas
    6       2       8     South Dakota     1             1  
Kentucky
    3       1       4     Tennessee           5       5  
Louisiana
    4             4     Texas     22       14       36  
Maine
    4       1       5     Utah     6       4       10  
Maryland
    11       5       16     Vermont     4             4  
Massachusetts
    22       1       23     Virginia     19       4       23  
Michigan
    20       21       41     Washington     17       11       28  
Minnesota
    14       6       20     West Virginia     5             5  
Mississippi
    1             1     Wisconsin     14       5       19  
                                                     
Missouri
    8       3       11     Total     518       228       746  
                                                     
Montana
    6       1       7                              
 
The following table reflects the number of stores opened, expanded or downsized and closed during each of the past five fiscal years (square footage in thousands):
 
Total Stores
 
                                         
                            Total
 
Fiscal
              In Operation at
    Expanded
    Square Footage
 
Year
  Opened     Closed     Year-End     or Downsized     at Year-End  
 
2006
    44       (57 )     838             16,198  
2007
    26       (63 )     801             16,215  
2008
    6       (33 )     774       1       15,932  
2009
    21       (31 )     764       1       16,002  
2010
    20       (38 )     746       1       15,943  
 
Our new store opening costs depend on the building type, store size and general cost levels in the geographical area. During fiscal 2010, we opened 15 large-format stores with an average size of approximately 27,900 square feet. Our average net investment in a large-format store is approximately $1.2 million, which includes leasehold improvements, net of landlord allowances, furniture, fixtures and equipment, inventory (net of payable support) and pre-opening expenses. Five small-format stores were opened in fiscal 2010 with an average size of approximately 19,500 square feet. Our average net investment in a small-format store is


7


 

approximately $0.8 million, which includes leasehold improvements, net of landlord allowances, furniture, fixtures and equipment, inventory (net of payable support) and pre-opening expenses.
 
During fiscal 2011, we expect to open approximately 30 new stores and close approximately 30 stores. We also plan to remodel at least 40 stores. As we accelerate our new store growth, we will focus on a smaller prototype store. The average size of our standard prototype will be approximately 22,000 square feet, with a small market or urban prototype of approximately 15,000 square feet. During fiscal 2011, the 30 new stores we expect to open will average 20,500 square feet, with 13 of the stores under 20,000 square feet.
 
Information Technology
 
Our point-of-sale registers and scanning devices record the sale of product at a SKU level at our stores. Those transactions are collected and transmitted to our host systems throughout the day and interface with both our financial and merchandising systems on a nightly basis. Information obtained from item-level scanning through our point-of-sale system enables us to identify important trends, increase in-stock levels of more popular SKUs, eliminate less profitable SKUs, analyze product margins and generate data for the purpose of evaluating our advertising and promotions.
 
We utilize handheld radio frequency devices for a variety of store tasks including price look-up, perpetual inventory exception counting, merchandise receiving, vendor returns and fabric sales processing. Our retail stores are equipped with broadband communication and central controllers, resulting in an enhanced customer checkout experience and a better platform to further automate internal store communications. Our in-store system allows us to provide better customer service by increasing the speed and accuracy of register checkout, enabling us to more rapidly restock merchandise and efficiently re-price sale items.
 
We operate our core financial, merchandise, human resource and retail processes on SAP Retail, complemented by point software solutions for key business processes. During fiscal 2010, we completed an implementation of the JDA Demand & Fulfillment system, enhancing our merchandise management portfolio of merchandise planning, space planning and product replenishment. We also completed a redesign and upgrade of our e-commerce technologies, improving stability and providing a platform for continued growth of our Joann.com business.
 
Status of Product or Line of Business
 
During fiscal 2010, there was no public announcement nor is there a public announcement anticipated about either a new product line or line of business involving the investment of a material portion of our assets.
 
Trademarks
 
We do business under trademarks for “Jo-Ann®,” “Joann.com®,” “Jo-Ann ETC®,” “Jo-Ann Fabrics®,” “Jo-Ann Fabric and Craft Stores®,” “Jo-Ann Fabrics & Crafts®,” “Jo-Ann Fabrics and Crafts®,” and “GoGreen Jo-Ann Fabric and Craft Stores®,” and we also own numerous trademarks relating to our private label products. We believe that our trademarks provide significant value to our business.
 
Seasonal Business
 
Our business exhibits seasonality that is typical for most retail companies, with much stronger sales in the second half of the year than in the first half of the year. Net earnings are highest during the months of September through December when sales volumes provide significant operating leverage. In fiscal 2010, approximately 56 percent of our net sales occurred in the third and fourth quarters, and approximately 30 percent occurred in the fourth quarter alone.


8


 

Customer Base
 
We are engaged in the retail sale of merchandise to the general public and, accordingly, no part of our business is dependent upon a single customer or a few customers. During fiscal 2010, no single store accounted for more than one percent of total net sales.
 
Backlog of Orders
 
We sell merchandise to the general public on a cash and carry basis and, accordingly, we have no significant backlog of orders.
 
Regulation
 
Various aspects of our operations are subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws, rules and regulations, any of which may change from time to time. We are impacted, in particular, by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008, which includes new limitations on lead and phthalates and imposes product testing and certification requirements with respect to many of the products we sell.
 
Competitive Conditions
 
We are the nation’s largest specialty retailer of fabrics and one of the largest specialty retailers of crafts, serving customers in their pursuit of apparel and craft sewing, crafting, home decorating and other creative endeavors. Our stores compete with other specialty fabric and craft retailers and selected mass merchants, including Wal-Mart, that dedicate a portion of their selling space to a limited selection of fabrics and craft supply items. In addition, alternative methods of selling fabrics and crafts, such as over the Internet, could result in additional competitors in the future and increased price competition since our customers could more readily comparison shop. We compete on the basis of product assortment, price, convenience and customer service. We believe that the combination of our product assortment under one roof, quality sales events and knowledgeable and customer focused team members provides us with a competitive advantage.
 
There are three companies that we primarily compete with nationally in the fabric and craft specialty retail industry, one in the fabric segment (Hancock Fabrics, Inc.), one in the craft segment (Michaels Stores, Inc.) and one in the craft segment that also carries fabrics (Hobby Lobby). There is also a regional operator, A.C. Moore Arts & Crafts, Inc., which competes in the craft segment. The balance of our competition is comprised of smaller regional and local operators. We believe that we have several advantages over most of our smaller competitors, including:
 
  •  purchasing power;
 
  •  brand recognition as the number one resource for fabric-related categories;
 
  •  ability to support efficient nationwide distribution; and
 
  •  the financial resources to execute our strategy going forward.
 
Research and Development
 
During the three fiscal years ended January 30, 2010, we have not incurred any material expense for research activities relating to the development of new products or services or the improvement of existing products or services.
 
Environmental Disclosure
 
We are not engaged in manufacturing. Accordingly, we do not believe that compliance with federal, state and local provisions regulating the discharge of material into the environment or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment will have a material adverse effect upon our capital expenditures, income or competitive position.


9


 

Employees
 
As of January 30, 2010, we had approximately 21,135 full and part-time employees, of whom 19,618 worked in our stores, 371 were employed in our Hudson, Ohio distribution center, 212 were employed in our Visalia, California distribution center, 182 were employed in our Opelika, Alabama distribution center and 752 were employed at our store support center in Hudson, Ohio. The number of part-time employees is substantially higher during our peak selling season. We believe our employee turnover is below average for retailers, primarily because our stores often are staffed with sewing and crafting enthusiasts. In addition, we provide an attractive work environment, employee discounts, flexible hours and competitive compensation packages within the local labor markets. Our ability to offer flexible scheduling is important in attracting and retaining these employees, since approximately 75 percent of our employees work part-time.
 
The United Steelworkers of America, Upholstery and Allied Industries Division currently represents employees who work in our Hudson, Ohio distribution center. Our current contract expires on May 5, 2011. We believe that our relationship with our employees and the union is good. Otherwise, none of our employees are unionized.
 
Foreign Operations and Export Sales
 
In fiscal 2010, we purchased approximately 23 percent of our products directly from manufacturers located in foreign countries. These foreign suppliers are located primarily in China and other Asian countries. In addition, many of our domestic suppliers purchase a portion of their products from foreign suppliers. Because a large percentage of our products are manufactured or sourced abroad, we are required to order these products further in advance than would be the case if the products were manufactured domestically. We do not have material long-term contracts with any manufacturers.
 
Other Available Information
 
We make available, free of charge, on our website at www.Joann.com, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as soon as we file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). We have posted on our website the charters of our Audit, Compensation and Corporate Governance Committees, our Corporate Governance Guidelines and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (which also serves as the Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Financial Officers), and will post any amendments or waivers thereto.
 
As required by Section 303A.12 of the Listed Company Manual of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), our Chief Executive Officer submitted to the NYSE his annual certification on July 6, 2009 stating that he was not aware of any violation by our company of the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE. In addition, we have filed, as exhibits to this annual report on Form 10-K for the year-ended January 30, 2010, the certifications of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer required under Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
Item 1A.  Risk Factors
 
Our business and financial performance is subject to various risks and uncertainties. In addition, we may, from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on our current views and assumptions and, as a result, are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected.
 
There are many factors that affect our business and financial performance, some of which are beyond our control. In addition to the factors discussed elsewhere in this Report, the following risks and uncertainties could materially adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and access to the capital markets. Other factors not presently known to us, or that we presently believe are not material, could also affect our business and financial performance. The risks discussed below could cause


10


 

our actual results to differ materially from our historical experience and from results predicted by forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf related to conditions or events that we anticipate may occur in the future. All forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf are qualified by the risks described below.
 
General economic factors may adversely affect our business, revenue and profitability
 
General economic conditions may adversely affect our financial performance. Consumer demand for the products that we sell could be adversely affected by higher interest rates, higher fuel and other energy costs, weakness in the housing market, inflation, deflation, recession, higher levels of unemployment, unavailability of consumer credit, higher consumer debt levels, consumer confidence in future economic conditions, weather, higher tax rates and other changes in tax laws, overall economic slowdown and other economic factors. Our sales generally represent discretionary spending by our customers and thus we may be more susceptible to factors negatively affecting consumer demand than other retailers selling less discretionary products. Lower consumer demand for our products would cause our revenues, and possibly our profitability, to decline, while a prolonged economic downturn could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
Our cost structure, and thus our operations and operating results, could be negatively impacted by higher interest rates; higher fuel and other energy costs; higher transportation costs; higher costs of labor, insurance and healthcare; inflation in other costs; higher tax rates and other changes in the tax laws; changes in other laws and regulations; increased regulatory enforcement; increased litigation; and other economic factors. These factors affect not only our operations, but also the operations of suppliers from which we purchase goods and services, which may result in cost increases to us and a negative impact on our operations and operating results.
 
Natural disasters and geo-political events could adversely affect our business operations and financial performance
 
The occurrence of one or more natural disasters, such as fires, hurricanes, tornados and earthquakes, and geo-political events, such as civil unrest in a country in which our suppliers are located or terrorist or military activities disrupting transportation, communication or utility systems, could adversely affect our operations and financial performance. Such events could result in physical damage to or destruction or disruption of one or more of our properties (including our headquarters, distribution centers and stores), the lack of an adequate workforce in parts or all of our operations, supply chain disruptions, data and communications disruptions, the inability of our customers to shop in our stores and the inability to operate our e-commerce business. These factors could also cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease or result in increased volatility in the United States and global financial markets and economy. Such occurrences could significantly impact our operating results and financial performance and result in increased volatility of the market price for our common shares.
 
We may not be able to achieve the expected benefits from the implementation of marketing initiatives
 
Our marketing initiatives designed to drive sales growth include marketing enhancements such as changes in the appearance, content and distribution of our advertising, new vendor programs and improved plan-o-gram processes. Our goal is to further enhance our customer shopping experience by modifying our marketing content to deliver a stronger value message, enhancing our industry-leading education and in-store demonstration programs and expanding the product offering and functionality of the Joann.com website.
 
We may not be able to successfully execute our marketing initiatives to realize the intended benefits and growth prospects. Certain risks such as increased competition and economic factors may limit our ability to capitalize on business opportunities and expand our business. Our efforts to drive sales growth may not bring the intended result. Assumptions underlying estimates of expected revenue growth or overall cost savings may not be met or economic conditions may deteriorate. Customer acceptance of our marketing initiatives may not be as anticipated.


11


 

Failure to timely respond to changes in consumer trends could negatively impact our business
 
The success of our business depends in part on our ability to identify and respond to evolving trends in demographics and consumer preferences. The long lead times associated with our foreign-sourced products exacerbate this challenge. Failure to identify and effectively respond to changing consumer tastes, preferences and spending patterns on a timely basis could negatively affect our relationship with our customers and the demand for our products. This, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects.
 
Competition could negatively impact our results
 
Competition is intense in the retail fabric and craft industry, with low entry barriers. We must remain competitive in the areas of quality, price, selection, customer service, convenience and reputation.
 
Our primary competition is comprised of specialty fabric retailers and specialty craft retailers such as Michaels Stores, Inc., a national chain that operates craft and framing stores, Hobby Lobby, a national chain that operates craft stores that also carries fabrics, Hancock Fabrics, Inc., a national chain that operates fabric stores, and A.C. Moore Arts & Crafts, Inc., a regional chain that operates craft stores in the eastern United States. We also compete with mass merchants, including Wal-Mart, that dedicate a portion of their selling space to a limited selection of fabrics, craft supplies and seasonal and holiday merchandise. Some of our competitors have stores nationwide, several operate regional chains and numerous others are local merchants. Some of our competitors, particularly the mass merchants, are larger and have greater financial resources than we do. The performance of competitors as well as changes in their pricing and promotional policies, marketing activities, new store openings, merchandising and operational strategies could impact our sales and profitability. Our sales and profitability could also be impacted by store liquidations of our competitors. In addition, alternative methods of selling fabrics and crafts, such as over the Internet, could result in additional competitors in the future and increased price competition since our customers could more readily comparison shop. Moreover, we ultimately compete against alternative sources of entertainment and leisure activities for our customers that are unrelated to the fabric and craft industry. This competition could negatively affect our sales and profitability.
 
Risks associated with our suppliers could adversely affect our operations and financial performance
 
Our business success is highly dependent on our ability to find qualified suppliers who can deliver products in a timely and efficient manner, and in compliance with our vendor standards and all applicable laws and regulations. Many of our suppliers are small companies with limited resources and lack of financial flexibility. Some of our suppliers are susceptible to cash flow issues, production difficulties, quality control issues and problems in delivering agreed-upon quantities on schedule and in compliance with regulatory requirements. We cannot assure that we would be able, if necessary, to return products to these suppliers and obtain refunds of our purchase price or obtain reimbursement or indemnification from them if their products prove defective, not in compliance with regulatory requirements or in violation of third-party intellectual property rights. In addition, many of these suppliers require extensive advance notice of our requirements in order to supply products in the quantities we desire. This long lead time requires us to place orders far in advance of the time when certain products will be offered for sale, exposing us to shifts in demand. In addition, some of our suppliers may be unable to withstand a downturn in economic conditions. The inability of key suppliers to access financing, or their insolvency, could lead to their failure to deliver merchandise or services. If we are unable to procure products and services when needed, our sales and cash flows could be negatively impacted in future periods. Significant failures on the part of our key suppliers could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
 
The significant product safety requirements arising under the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 and state product safety laws may represent a compliance challenge to some of our suppliers, could negatively impact the ability of such suppliers to deliver compliant products to us and thus negatively impact our business operations and performance. Delivery of non-compliant products could result in liability to our company; while we obtain indemnifications from our suppliers with respect to compliance issues, some suppliers might not have the financial resources to stand behind their indemnifications and we could also suffer damage to our reputation.


12


 

Our dependence on foreign suppliers subjects us to possible delays in receipt of merchandise and to the risks involved in foreign operations
 
We are heavily dependent on foreign suppliers. In fiscal 2010, we purchased approximately 23 percent of our products directly from manufacturers located in foreign countries (in particular, in China and other Asian countries). In addition, many of our domestic suppliers purchase a portion of their products from foreign suppliers.
 
Foreign sourcing subjects us to a number of risks, including long lead times; work stoppages; transportation delays and interruptions; product quality issues; employee rights issues; other social concerns; epidemics; political instability; economic disruptions; the imposition of tariffs, duties, quotas, import and export controls and other trade restrictions; changes in governmental policies; and other events. If any of these events occur, it could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, reductions in the value of the U.S. dollar or revaluation of the Chinese currency, or other foreign currencies, could ultimately increase the prices that we pay for our products. All of our products manufactured overseas and imported into the United States are subject to duties collected by the United States Customs Service. We may be subjected to additional duties, significant monetary penalties, the seizure and forfeiture of the products we are attempting to import or the loss of import privileges, if we or our suppliers are found to be in violation of U.S. laws and regulations applicable to the importation of our products.
 
Our business depends on shopping center traffic
 
Our stores generally are located in strip shopping centers and “big box” shopping centers. Our sales are dependent in part on a high volume of shopping center traffic. Shopping center traffic may be adversely affected by, among other things, economic downturns, rising fuel costs, gasoline shortages, the closing of anchor stores, shopping center occupancy rates and mix, new shopping centers and other retail developments, or changes in customer shopping preferences. A decline in the popularity of shopping center shopping among our target customers could have a material adverse effect on customer traffic and reduce our sales and net earnings.
 
The seasonality of our sales may negatively impact our operating results
 
Our business is seasonal, with a significant amount of sales and earnings occurring in the third, and in particular, the fourth fiscal quarters. Our inventory levels and related short-term financing needs also are seasonal, with the greatest requirements occurring during our third fiscal quarter as we increase our inventory in preparation for our peak selling season. Weak sales during the second half of the year will negatively impact our operating results and cash flow generation.
 
Disruption to the transportation system or increases in transportation costs may negatively impact our operating results
 
We rely upon various means of transportation, including shipments by air, sea, rail and truck, to deliver products to our distribution centers from vendors and from our distribution centers to our stores, as well as for direct shipments from vendors to stores. Labor shortages or capacity constraints in the transportation industry, disruptions to the national and international transportation infrastructure, fuel shortages, or transportation cost increases (such as increases in fuel costs or port fees) could adversely affect our business and operating results.
 
The failure to attract and retain qualified employees could limit our growth and negatively impact our operations
 
Our continued success depends on our ability to attract and retain qualified management, administrative and store personnel. Our inability to do so may have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects. Our success depends to a significant extent both upon the continued services of our current executive and senior management team, as well as our ability to attract, hire, motivate and retain additional qualified management in the future. Competition for key executives in the retail industry is intense, and our operations could be adversely affected if we cannot attract and retain qualified management.


13


 

Many of our employees are in entry level and part-time positions with historically high rates of turnover. Our ability to meet our labor needs while controlling our costs is subject to external factors such as unemployment levels, prevailing wage rates, benefits costs, minimum wage legislation, changes in employment legislation and regulations, workers compensation costs and changing demographics. If we are unable to attract, retain and motivate a sufficient number of quality employees at a reasonable cost, our operating results could be impacted adversely.
 
The United Steelworkers of America, Upholstery and Allied Industries Division currently represents employees who work in our Hudson, Ohio distribution center. Our current contract expires on May 5, 2011. We believe that our relations with our employees and the union are good, but if a strike were to occur it may adversely affect our business, financial conditions and results of operations.
 
Failure to manage inventory effectively could negatively impact our operations
 
Due to the nature of our business, we purchase much of our inventory well in advance of each selling season. If we misjudge consumer preferences or demands, we could have excess inventory that may need to be held for a long period of time, written down, sold at prices lower than expected, or discarded in order to clear excess inventory at the end of a selling season. Conversely, if we underestimate consumer demand, we may not be able to provide products to our customers to meet their demand. Either event could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
In addition, inventory shrink (inventory theft or loss) rates can significantly impact our business performance and financial results. Failure to manage inventory shrink rates could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
The loss of, or disruption in, or our inability to efficiently operate our distribution network could have a negative impact on our business
 
We operate three distribution centers to support our business. If complications arise with any one facility or any facility is severely damaged or destroyed, our other distribution centers may not be able to support the resulting additional distribution demands. This may adversely affect our ability to receive and deliver inventory on a timely basis.
 
The majority of our inventory is shipped directly from suppliers to our distribution centers where the inventory is then processed, sorted, picked and shipped to our stores. We rely in large part on the orderly operation of this receiving and distribution process, which depends on adherence to shipping schedules and effective management of our distribution network. Although we believe that our receiving and distribution process is efficient and well-positioned to support our operating and strategic plans, we cannot assure that we have anticipated all issues or that events beyond our control, such as disruptions in operations due to natural disasters or other catastrophic events, labor disagreements or shipping problems, will not result in delays in the delivery of merchandise to our stores. Such delays could negatively impact our business.
 
Disruptions to our information systems, or our failure to adequately support, maintain and upgrade these systems, could negatively impact our operations and financial results.
 
We depend on a variety of information systems for the efficient functioning of our business. In particular, we rely on our information systems to effectively process transactions, manage inventory, purchase, sell and ship goods on a timely basis and maintain cost-efficient operations. Disruptions to our information systems, or our failure to adequately support, maintain and upgrade these systems could have a material adverse impact on our operations and financial results.
 
While we have implemented a disaster recovery plan intended to minimize the effect of any disruption to our information systems, the failure of our information systems to perform as designed could disrupt our business and harm sales and profitability. Any material disruption or slowdown of our systems could cause information to be lost or delayed, which could have a negative impact on our business. We may experience operational problems with our information systems as a result of power outages, computer and telecommunication failures, other system failures, viruses, security breaches, natural disasters, terrorist and criminal activities, employee usage errors or other causes. If our computer systems are damaged or cease to function


14


 

properly, we may have to make a significant investment to fix or replace them, and we may suffer interruptions in our operations in the interim.
 
In addition, costs and potential problems and interruptions associated with the implementation of new or upgraded systems and technology or with maintenance or adequate support of existing systems could also disrupt or reduce the efficiency of our operations. We also rely heavily on our information technology staff. If we cannot meet our staffing needs in this area, we may not be able to fulfill our technology or business initiatives while continuing to provide maintenance on existing systems. Our inability to fulfill these initiatives and to maintain the existing systems adequately could materially adversely affect our operations and financial results.
 
Financing needs could restrict our operations
 
Our business is dependent on the availability of credit to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate requirements. We currently have in place a secured credit facility, which expires in September 2013. We believe that this financing is adequate to meet our foreseeable needs. If our financing needs were to increase, we might not be able to obtain such financing on acceptable terms, or at all, which could have a material adverse affect on our business.
 
Failure to comply with the restrictions placed on us by our lenders could have a material adverse effect on our business
 
Our secured credit facility agreement contains restrictive and financial covenants, which limit our ability to borrow money, make investments, or make payments on our capital stock, incur liens and take other actions. We currently are in compliance with all of these covenants and do not foresee any issues in continuing to comply with these covenants in the future. However, our ability to remain in compliance with these covenants and tests may be affected by unanticipated events or events beyond our control. If we fail to meet these tests or breach any of the covenants, the lenders under the secured credit facility could declare all amounts outstanding under the facility, including accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable.
 
Failure to adequately maintain the security of our electronic and other confidential information could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations
 
We are dependent upon automated information technology processes. As part of our normal business activities, we collect and store certain confidential information, including personal information with respect to customers and employees. We may share some of this information with vendors who assist us with certain aspects of our business. Moreover, the success of our e-commerce operations depends upon the secure transmission of confidential and personal data over public networks, including the use of cashless payments. Any failure on the part of us or our vendors to maintain the security of our confidential data and our employees’ and customers’ personal information, including via the penetration of our network security and the misappropriation of confidential and personal information, could result in business disruption, damage to our reputation, financial obligations to third parties, fines, penalties, regulatory proceedings and private litigation with potentially large costs, and also result in deterioration in our employees’ and customers’ confidence in us and other competitive disadvantages, and thus have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, a security breach could require that we expend significant additional resources to enhance our information security systems and could result in a disruption to our operations.
 
We currently are certified as being in compliance with the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (“PCI DSS”), but must be recertified on a regular basis with the next recertification scheduled in August 2010 for our stores and Joann.com. A company processing, storing, or transmitting payment card data must be PCI DSS compliant or risk losing its ability to process credit card payments and being audited and/or fined. Failure to maintain our PCI certification could result in our inability to accept credit card payments or subject us to penalties and thus could have a material negative effect on our operations.


15


 

Failure to comply with various regulations, or increased litigation, may result in damage to our business
 
Our policies and procedures are designed to comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including those imposed by the SEC and NYSE. Additional legal and regulatory requirements such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act have increased the complexity of the regulatory environment. Also, various aspects of our operations are subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws, rules and regulations, any of which may change from time to time. We are impacted, in particular, by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008, which includes new limitations on lead and phthalates and imposes product testing and certification requirements with respect to many of the products we sell, and state product safety laws and regulations. Additionally, we are regularly involved in various litigation matters that arise in the ordinary course of our business, including liability claims, employment-related claims, contractual disputes and allegations that we have infringed third-party intellectual property rights.
 
Litigation or regulatory developments could adversely affect our business operations and financial performance. Also, failure to comply with the various regulations may result in damage to our reputation, civil and criminal liability, fines and penalties, increased cost of regulatory compliance and restatements of financial statements.
 
We may not be able to successfully implement our store growth strategy
 
Our store growth strategy includes opening new stores in existing and new markets, replacing some of our small-format stores with large-format stores and remodeling some of our stores. We face significant competition from other retailers for suitable locations. We also may face difficulties in negotiating leases on acceptable terms. New store openings involve certain risks, including constructing, furnishing, supplying and staffing a store in a timely and cost effective manner and accurately assessing the demographic or retail environment for a particular location. Our future sales at new and remodeled stores may not meet our projections, which could adversely impact our return on investment. Our inability to execute our store growth strategy in a manner that generates appropriate returns on investment could have an adverse impact on our future growth and profitability.
 
Changes in accounting standards
 
A change in accounting standards or practices can have a significant effect on our reported results of operations. New accounting pronouncements and interpretations of existing accounting rules and practices have occurred and may occur in the future. Changes to existing rules may adversely affect our reported financial results.
 
Effective tax rate
 
Our effective tax rate is derived from a combination of applicable tax rates in jurisdictions in which we operate. Our effective tax rate may be lower or higher than our tax rates have been in the past due to numerous factors including the sources of our income, any agreements we may have with taxing authorities in various jurisdictions, changes in tax laws and the tax filing positions we take in various jurisdictions. We base our estimate of an effective tax rate at any given point in time upon a calculated mix of the tax rates applicable to our company and to estimates of the amount of business likely to be done in any given jurisdiction. The loss of one or more agreements with taxing jurisdictions, a change in the mix of our business, changes in rules related to accounting for income taxes, changes in tax laws in any of the taxing jurisdictions, or adverse outcomes from tax audits could result in an unfavorable change in our effective tax rate, which could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
 
Inadequacy of our insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our company
 
We maintain third party insurance coverage against various liability risks and risks of property loss, as well directors and officers liability insurance coverage. While we believe these arrangements are an effective way to insure against liability and property damage risks, the potential liabilities associated with those risks or other events could exceed the coverage provided by such arrangements. Significant uninsured liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our company.


16


 

Cash and cash equivalents held at financial institutions exceed federally insured limits
 
We have a significant amount of cash and cash equivalents (money market funds) at financial institutions that are in excess of federally insured limits. With the current financial environment and the instability of financial institutions, we cannot be assured that we will not experience losses on our deposits.
 
Our stock price is subject to significant volatility
 
Our stock price is affected by a number of factors, including quarterly variations in financial results; the competitive landscape; general economic and market conditions; estimates, projections and speculation by the investment community and press; and rating agency upgrades and downgrades. As a result, our stock price is subject to significant volatility.
 
Events harming our company’s reputation could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, financial results and stock price
 
We are dependent on our reputation. Events that can damage our reputation include, but are not limited to, legal violations, actual or perceived ethical problems, product safety issues, actual or perceived poor employee relations, actual or perceived poor customer service, store appearance or operational issues, or events outside of our control which generate negative publicity with respect to our company. Any event that has the potential to negatively impact our reputation with customers, employees, suppliers, communities, governmental officials and others could have a materially adverse effect on our business prospects, financial results and stock price.
 
Other Factors
 
The foregoing list of risk factors is not all inclusive. Other factors and unanticipated events could adversely affect our business. We do not undertake to revise or update these risks to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of this report.
 
Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments
 
None.
 
Item 2.  Properties
 
Our store support center and Hudson distribution center are located in a 1.4 million square foot facility on 105 acres in Hudson, Ohio. We own both the facility and the real estate. The distribution center occupies 1.0 million square feet and the remainder is used as our store support center, a large-format store, and office and retail space we lease to two other tenants. In addition, we own 65 acres of land adjacent to our Hudson, Ohio facility.
 
We lease and operate a 630,000 square foot distribution center located on an 80-acre site in Visalia, California. We also opened our third distribution center in April 2006. We own this 705,000 square foot facility and the 105-acre site that it is located on in Opelika, Alabama.
 
The remaining properties that we occupy are leased retail store facilities, located primarily in high-traffic shopping centers. All store leases are operating leases and generally have initial terms of 5 to 15 years with renewal options for up to 20 years. Certain store leases contain escalation clauses and contingent rents based on a percent of net sales in excess of defined minimums. During fiscal 2010, we incurred $182.2 million of rental expense, including common area maintenance, taxes and insurance for store locations. Despite closing 222 stores over the last five years, as of January 30, 2010, we were only paying rent on eight closed store locations for which we have been unable to reach an early lease termination settlement with the landlord or sublease the property.


17


 

As of January 30, 2010, the current terms of our store leases, assuming we exercise all lease renewal options, were as follows:
 
         
    Number of
 
Fiscal Year Lease Terms Expire
  Store Leases  
 
Month-to-month
    18  
2011
    65  
2012
    57  
2013
    59  
2014
    25  
2015
    28  
Thereafter
    516  
         
Total
    768  
         
 
Item 3.  Legal Proceedings
 
We are involved in various litigation matters in the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently involved in any litigation which we expect, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
 
Item 4.  Reserved
 
Executive Officers of the Registrant
 
The following information is set forth pursuant to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K.
 
Our executive officers are as follows:
 
             
Name
 
Age
 
Position
 
Darrell Webb
    52     Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer; effective as of January 31, 2010, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Travis Smith
    37     Chief Operating Officer; effective as of January 31, 2010, President and Chief Operating Officer
Kenneth Haverkost
    53     Executive Vice President, Store Operations
James Kerr
    47     Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
 
Darrell Webb has been our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer since July 2006. From July 2006 to January 30, 2010, Mr. Webb also served as our President. Previously, he was President of Fred Meyer Stores, a division of The Kroger Company, a large supermarket retailer, from 2002 until July 2006; and President of Kroger’s Quality Food Center Division from 1999 to 2002.
 
Travis Smith has been our President and Chief Operating Officer since January 31, 2010. Mr. Smith was our Chief Operating Officer from February 2009 to January 30, 2010. Prior to February 2009, Mr. Smith was our Executive Vice President, Merchandising and Marketing from July 2006 to January 2009. For eight years prior to assuming this role, Mr. Smith held merchandising and marketing positions of increasing responsibility with Fred Meyer Stores, a division of The Kroger Company. Immediately prior to joining us, Mr. Smith was Senior Vice President, General Merchandise of Fred Meyer Stores.
 
Kenneth Haverkost has been our Executive Vice President, Store Operations since October 2007. For the 22 years prior to assuming his current role, Mr. Haverkost held positions of increasing responsibility with Fred Meyer Stores, a division of The Kroger Company. Immediately prior to joining us, Mr. Haverkost was Senior Vice President and Director of Store Operations of Fred Meyer Stores.
 
James Kerr has been our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer since July 2006. For the eight years prior to assuming his current role, Mr. Kerr was our Vice President, Controller and he also served as the Chief Accounting Officer from February through July 2006.


18


 

 
PART II
 
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
Our common shares are traded on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “JAS.” As of April 1, 2010, there were 424 shareholders of record. The closing price of the shares on April 1, 2010 was $42.57.
 
The quarterly high and low closing stock prices for fiscal 2010 and 2009 are presented in the table below:
 
                 
    Common Shares  
    High     Low  
 
Quarter Ended Fiscal 2010:
               
January 30, 2010
  $ 38.14     $ 25.44  
October 31, 2009
    31.32       22.50  
August 1, 2009
    23.97       18.25  
May 2, 2009
    19.07       10.79  
Quarter Ended Fiscal 2009:
               
January 31, 2009
  $ 19.60     $ 10.31  
November 1, 2008
    27.00       14.20  
August 2, 2008
    24.95       18.25  
May 3, 2008
    19.91       12.22  
 
We did not pay cash dividends on our common shares during fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009. Our dividend policy has been to retain earnings for operations and reinvestment into our business. Payments of dividends, if any, in the future will be determined by the Board of Directors in light of business conditions and other considerations. Under our secured credit facility, cash dividends are allowed up to a maximum of $20 million annually as long as we maintain a certain level of excess availability as defined in our secured credit facility.
 
See Part III, Item 12 for information regarding our equity compensation plans.
 
                                 
    Purchases of Equity Securities by Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.  
                Total Number of
    Maximum Number of
 
                Shares Purchased as
    Shares that May Yet
 
          Average
    Part of Publicly
    Be Purchased Under
 
    Total Number of
    Price Paid
    Announced Plans or
    the Plans or
 
    Shares Purchased     per Share     Programs     Programs  
 
November 1 — 28, 2009
    1,466     $ 32.93       1,209,582       940,418  
November 29, 2009 — January 2, 2010
    4,365     $ 32.33       1,213,947       936,053  
January 3 — 30, 2010
                1,213,947       936,053  
                                 
Total
    5,831     $ 32.48       1,213,947       936,053  
                                 
 
In December 1998, our Board of Directors authorized a discretionary program that allowed us to buy back 2,150,000 common shares. That program does not have a stated expiration date. In the table above, the total number of shares purchased represents shares repurchased directly from the market, as well as shares repurchased from employees in connection with the vesting of restricted shares that were provided to us to satisfy minimum statutory tax withholding requirements. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011 through April 9, 2010, we bought back 452,517 shares at an average price paid per share of $41.73.


19


 

STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
 
The following graph compares the yearly changes in total shareholder return on our common shares with the total return of the S&P Composite — 500 Stock Index, the S&P Specialty Stores Index and our peer group for the last five years. In each case, we assumed an initial investment of $100 on the market close on the last trading day before the beginning of the registrant’s fifth preceding fiscal year. Each subsequent date on the chart represents the last day of the indicated fiscal year. We did not pay any dividends during such five-year period. The S&P Specialty Stores Index is the same index that we used last year, which we titled “S&P 600 Specialty Stores Index” in our last Form 10-K. The peer group index consists of the following publicly held companies:
 
         
•   A.C. Moore Arts & Crafts
  •   Men’s Warehouse    
•   Big 5 Sporting Goods
  •   Pep Boys — Manny, Moe & Jack    
•   Borders Group
  •   PetSmart    
•   Brown Shoe
  •   Pier 1 Imports    
•   Cabelas
  •   Stage Stores    
•   Charming Shoppes
  •   Ulta Salon Cosmetics & Fragrances    
•   Collective Brands (formerly Payless Shoesource)
  •   Williams-Sonoma    
•   Dick’s Sporting Goods
  •   Zale    
•   DSW
       
 
(PERFORMANCE GRAPH)


20


 

 
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
 
The following table presents our selected financial data for each of our five fiscal years ending January 30, 2010. The selected financial data for all fiscal years presented was derived from the audited financial statements and should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. We reclassified certain amounts in the financial statements for our four fiscal years ending January 31, 2009 to conform to the current year presentation.
 
                                         
    Fiscal Year-Ended (a)  
    January 30,
    January 31,
    February 2,
    February 3,
    January 28,
 
    2010     2009     2008     2007     2006  
          (Dollars in millions, except per share data)        
 
Operating Results:
                                       
Net sales
  $ 1,990.7     $ 1,901.1     $ 1,878.8     $ 1,850.6     $ 1,882.8  
Total net sales percentage increase (decrease)
    4.7 %     1.2 %     1.5 %     (1.7 )%     3.9 %
Same-store sales percentage increase (decrease) (b)
    3.1 %     0.5 %     3.5 %     (5.9 )%     (0.8 )%
Gross margin
    975.7       882.5       872.4       859.8       859.2  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    793.6       775.3       774.8       790.5       774.0  
Store pre-opening and closing costs
    11.7       12.3       8.4       11.1       23.4  
Depreciation and amortization
    56.3       54.2       51.8       49.2       42.2  
Goodwill impairment
                            27.1  
   
Operating profit (loss)
    114.1       40.7       37.4       9.0       (7.5 )
Operating profit (loss) as a percent of net sales
    5.7 %     2.1 %     2.0 %     0.5 %     (0.4 )%
Gain on purchase of senior subordinated notes (c)
    (1.3 )     (4.2 )                  
Interest expense
    6.3       9.4       12.5       15.6       12.8  
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
    66.6       21.9       15.4       (2.9 )     (23.0 )
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax (d)
                      1.0        
   
Net income (loss)
  $ 66.6     $ 21.9     $ 15.4     $ (1.9 )   $ (23.0 )
Net income (loss) as a percent of net sales
    3.3 %     1.2 %     0.8 %     (0.1 )%     (1.2 )%
Per Share Data:
                                       
Income (loss) per common share — diluted:
                                       
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
  $ 2.51     $ 0.86     $ 0.62     $ (0.12 )   $ (1.01 )
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
                      0.04        
   
Net income (loss) — diluted
  $ 2.51     $ 0.86     $ 0.62     $ (0.08 )   $ (1.01 )
Weighted average shares outstanding — diluted (000’s)
    26,535       25,483       24,950       23,519       22,716  
   
Financial Position:
                                       
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 217.1     $ 80.6     $ 25.4     $ 18.4     $ 17.9  
Inventories
    416.8       429.4       472.2       453.4       514.7  
Inventory turnover
    2.4 x     2.3 x     2.2 x     2.0 x     2.1 x
Current assets
    686.1       563.8       547.8       543.8       605.8  
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net
    293.7       314.8       297.5       311.8       331.7  
Total assets
    1,000.4       899.7       869.4       866.3       946.8  
Current liabilities (e)
    327.2       248.0       228.7       225.5       242.6  
   


21


 

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data (Continued)
 
                                         
    Fiscal Year-Ended (a)  
    January 30,
    January 31,
    February 2,
    February 3,
    January 28,
 
    2010     2009     2008     2007     2006  
          (Dollars in millions, except per share data)        
 
Long-term debt
          66.0       100.0       125.3       203.7  
Shareholders’ equity
    565.6       477.7       440.0       409.8       399.4  
Debt to total capitalization
    7.7 %     12.1 %     18.5 %     23.4 %     33.8 %
Debt to total capitalization, net of cash and cash equivalents
    (42.8 )%     (3.2 )%     14.5 %     20.7 %     31.7 %
Per Share Data:
                                       
Book value (f)
  $ 21.57     $ 18.95     $ 17.97     $ 17.18     $ 17.09  
Shares outstanding, net of treasury shares (000’s)
    26,216       25,204       24,485       23,857       23,375  
Other Financial Information:
                                       
Capital expenditures:
                                       
Cash
  $ 29.2     $ 63.6     $ 28.6     $ 44.6     $ 118.9  
Cash — landlord reimbursement (g)
    10.5       11.1       9.1       13.5       23.9  
   
Total capital expenditures
  $ 39.7     $ 74.7     $ 37.7     $ 58.1     $ 142.8  
   
   
Store Count:
                                       
Small-format stores
    518       554       578       615       676  
Large-format stores
    228       210       196       186       162  
   
Total
    746       764       774       801       838  
   
   
Store Square Footage (000’s) (h)
                                       
Small-format stores
    7,619       8,141       8,477       9,034       9,810  
Large-format stores
    8,324       7,861       7,455       7,181       6,388  
   
Total
    15,943       16,002       15,932       16,215       16,198  
   
   
 
 
(a) All years include 52 weeks except for the fiscal year-ended February 3, 2007, which includes 53 weeks.
 
(b) Same-store sales are defined as net sales from stores that have been open one year or more. Net sales are included in the same-store sales calculation on the first day of the first month following the one-year anniversary of a store’s opening. In conjunction with the expansion or relocation of a store, the net sales results from that store is excluded from the same-store sales calculation until the first day of the first month following the one-year anniversary of that store’s expansion or relocation. Further, in a 53-week year, net sales of the first 52 weeks are compared to the comparable 52 weeks of the prior period.
 
(c) Gain on purchase of senior subordinated notes includes the gain, net of related write-off of applicable deferred financing costs, on the purchase of the company’s senior subordinated notes. See Note 6 — Financing, contained in the notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
(d) Effective January 29, 2006, the company changed its measurement of stock-based compensation using the fair value method of accounting, resulting in a cumulative after-tax adjustment related to estimated forfeitures.
 
(e) On March 1, 2010, the company redeemed all outstanding principal amount of its 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes of approximately $47.5 million at par early, which was announced on January 5, 2010. As such, the company has classified the senior subordinated notes as short-term as of January 30, 2010.
 
(f) Book value is calculated by dividing shareholders’ equity by shares outstanding, net of treasury shares.
 
(g) Capital expenditures reimbursed by the landlord represent the cost of assets acquired through the utilization of landlord lease incentives.
 
(h) Total store square footage includes selling floor space and inventory storage areas.


22


 

 
Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
This discussion provides the reader with information that will assist in an overall understanding of our financial statements, changes in certain key indicators from year to year, the factors that account for those changes and how certain accounting principles have impacted our financial statements. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements presented in this Form 10-K. In addition, the financial information presented for years prior to fiscal 2010 has been reclassified for certain amounts to conform to the current year presentation.
 
Overview
 
We are the nation’s largest specialty retailer of fabrics and one of the largest specialty retailers of crafts, serving customers in their pursuit of apparel and craft sewing, crafting, home decorating and other creative endeavors. Our retail stores and website feature a variety of competitively priced merchandise used in sewing, crafting and home decorating projects, including fabrics, notions, crafts, frames, paper crafting material, artificial floral, home accents, finished seasonal and home décor merchandise.
 
We review and manage to a number of key indicators in evaluating financial performance, the most significant of which are:
 
  •  Net sales.  We closely monitor our net sales, including net sales from stores open one year or more (“same-store sales”), by our two store formats, small-format stores and large-format stores. Net sales in the aggregate and by store type are compared to previous periods to measure our overall sales growth, and same-store sales are compared to previous periods to determine whether existing stores are growing their sales volume. We also closely monitor average ticket value, both in total and by store format. Average ticket represents total sales divided by the total number of customer transactions. Customer transactions are impacted by the number of customers that shop in our stores. These indicators help to measure the effectiveness of our product assortments, promotions and service.
 
  •  Gross margin.  Our management uses gross margin to evaluate merchandising, marketing and operating effectiveness for the company. Merchandise selection and other future decisions such as pricing and promotional activity are, in part, based on gross margin performance.
 
  •  Selling, general and administrative expense as a percent of sales.  We monitor the leveraging of selling, general and administrative expense in relation to our sales in order to measure our effectiveness in managing expenses.
 
  •  Inventory.  We closely monitor our inventory investment, which is our single largest invested asset, and our inventory turnover rate. Due to the large investment in inventory, changes in inventory levels can have a significant impact on our liquidity. Also, inventory turnover is an indicator of how effectively we manage our inventory levels in relation to our sales.
 
  •  Debt to total capitalization and excess credit availability.  We monitor our debt balances and leverage as a percent of total capitalization. We also monitor current and projected excess availability, as defined under our senior bank credit facility, in order to ensure that adequate flexibility is available to execute our operating and strategic plans.
 
An overview of our fiscal 2010 performance compared with fiscal 2009 performance follows:
 
  •  Net sales increased 4.7 percent to $1.991 billion. Same-store sales increased 3.1 percent versus a 0.5 percent same-store sales increase for the prior year. The increase in same-store sales primarily was driven by a 3.8 percent increase in customer transactions, our store remodel and optimization programs, more effective marketing and the benefit of competitive withdrawals in the sewing business.
 
  •  Our gross margin rate, as a percentage of net sales, increased 260 basis points from 46.4 percent to 49.0 percent, primarily due to direct sourcing, product cost deflation on imports and new systems capabilities.


23


 

 
  •  Our selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”), as a percentage of net sales, excluding those expenses separately identified in the statement of operations, decreased 90 basis points from 40.8 percent during fiscal 2009 to 39.9 percent during fiscal 2010. The decrease is primarily due to expense leverage from the increase in sales as well as the result of our continued efforts to control expenses.
 
  •  Inventory decreased by $12.6 million in fiscal 2010. Our inventory turnover improved from 2.3 turns for fiscal 2009 to 2.4 turns for fiscal 2010. The improvement is the result of our inventory initiatives to reduce seasonal and fashion merchandise, which have a higher promotional and clearance risk than our basic inventory categories.
 
  •  Our debt to total capitalization ratio improved 440 basis points from 12.1 percent for fiscal 2009 to 7.7 percent for fiscal 2010. During the year, we purchased $18.5 million of our senior subordinated notes. As of fiscal 2010 year end, we had approximately $242.5 million of excess availability under our senior bank credit facility.
 
Executive Overview of Fiscal 2010
 
                                         
    Qtr 1   Qtr 2   Qtr 3   Qtr 4   Total
    (dollars in millions)
 
Net sales
  $ 460.0     $ 419.4     $ 509.1     $ 602.2     $ 1,990.7  
Same-store sales percent change
    1.0 %     1.8 %     4.3 %     4.4 %     3.1 %
Gross margin
  $ 222.9     $ 206.6     $ 259.8     $ 286.4     $ 975.7  
Gross margin percent
    48.5 %     49.3 %     51.0 %     47.6 %     49.0 %
Gross margin basis point change from prior year
    210       170       200       410       260  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
  $ 190.4     $ 193.3     $ 202.0     $ 207.9     $ 793.6  
SG&A percent to sales
    41.4 %     46.1 %     39.7 %     34.5 %     39.9 %
SG&A basis point decrease from prior year
          140       190       40       90  
Net income (loss)
  $ 8.6     $ (3.2 )   $ 24.1     $ 37.1     $ 66.6  
Net income (loss) percent to sales
    1.9 %     (0.8 )%     4.7 %     6.2 %     3.3 %
Net income (loss) basis point change from prior year
    120       210       260       260       210  
 
During fiscal 2010, we achieved sales, margin, earnings and cash flow improvement and our financial results exceeded our original expectations, primarily due to the execution of the following operating initiatives:
 
  •  Revitalizing our store portfolio;
 
  •  Expanding gross margin rates;
 
  •  Capitalizing on the competitive market changes; and
 
  •  Leveraging our new systems.
 
Our store remodel and optimization programs continued to generate incremental sales. During the year, we opened 20 new stores, completed 30 store remodels and optimized over 180 small-format stores.
 
Gross margin increased 260 basis points during fiscal 2010. The following four key factors that we discussed in previous quarters continued to positively impact gross margin:
 
  •  More direct sourcing of products from Asia;
 
  •  Lower transportation expenses;
 
  •  Product cost deflation on imported merchandise; and
 
  •  Improvements in markdown controls from our new POS system enhancements.


24


 

 
We believe that the competitive environment provided us an opportunity to capture market share during fiscal 2010. In the specialty retail channel, we believe we are capturing market share from weaker competitors, based on our sales trend relative to other craft and fabric retailers. In addition, Wal-Mart continues to remove fabric departments as they remodel stores.
 
While executing the above operating initiatives, we maintained tight controls over expenses, inventory and capital spend. We focused on controlling those variables that were within our control when it appeared that top-line sales growth would be challenging, due to the recession. However, we exceeded our expectation for sales growth. Lowering our expense structure by implementing more efficient work processes in our stores and distribution centers, we were able to achieve the best financial results in the history of our company.
 
We expect the gross margin and expense improvements that we achieved during fiscal 2010 to be sustainable into fiscal 2011. In addition, we expect to increase gross margin and leverage expenses further during fiscal 2011, and to increase our operating margin above six percent. We plan to accomplish this continued improvement by executing our updated strategic plan, which we continue to refine with targeted new initiatives each year. All of these initiatives are designed to help us:
 
  •  Revitalize our store portfolio;
 
  •  Enhance our marketing and merchandising programs; and
 
  •  Improve our customer shopping experience.
 
Some examples of new initiatives for fiscal 2011 include:
 
  •  Accelerate our new store growth and remodel activity;
 
  •  Roll out several dynamic new product assortments and merchandising programs;
 
  •  Expand our management training program to enhance the skills of our store management teams; and
 
  •  Introduce a mystery shopper program to provide independent feedback on store conditions and service, so we can react quickly to address areas of opportunity.
 
Based on the strong performance from our new, smaller prototype stores, we will increase our new store openings to at least 30 during fiscal 2011. We then expect to increase the number of new store openings by at least 10 stores per year over each of the following four years, for a compounded annual growth rate for retail square footage of about 2.5 percent over the five-year period between fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2015.
 
We plan to increase remodel activity in a similar fashion, since these projects continue to deliver favorable returns. We will complete at least 40 remodels during fiscal 2011, plus an incremental 10 projects per year over the following four years. This new store and remodel program will result in 95 percent of our store portfolio being either new or remodeled within the past 10 years, by the time we complete fiscal 2015.
 
As the U.S. census is getting underway, early forecasts suggest that all age groups over 50 will grow by 20 percent or more for the next decade. These age groups are among our most active sewers and crafters, so we believe the demographic trends are favorable for our business in the years to come. At the same time, we continue to cultivate the next generation of sewers and crafters with initiatives like our education program, prom contest and expanded kids craft assortment.
 
Finally, we believe the improving economy will provide a continued favorable environment for our performance during fiscal 2011. We believe that a modest recovery will provide meaningful benefit, as sales in those categories that struggled during the recession exert less pressure on same-store sales trends and promotional and clearance markdowns.
 
Recent Developments and Business Update
 
We are pleased with the progress we have made during fiscal 2010, in one of the most uncertain periods in U.S. retailing, which made our results challenging to forecast. As we move into fiscal 2011, we expect a


25


 

more normalized environment. Based upon our operating assumptions, our key considerations underlying our outlook for fiscal 2011 include:
 
  •  Same-store sales increase of approximately 2.5% to 3.5% for the year;
 
  •  Gross margin rate improvement of 20 to 50 basis points for the year;
 
  •  Selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of net sales, improvement of 20 to 50 basis points for the year;
 
  •  Capital expenditures, net of landlord allowances, for the full year of approximately $50 million;
 
  •  Earnings per diluted share in the range of $2.75 to $2.90 for the year;
 
  •  Free cash flow in the range of $75 to $80 million for the year (free cash flow defined as net income plus depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation expense and changes in working capital, less capital expenditures, net of landlord allowances);
 
  •  Weighted-average diluted share count of approximately 27.7 million shares for the year.
 
We expect fiscal 2011 pre-opening and closing costs of approximately $13.0 million to $14.0 million as we plan to open approximately 30 stores and close approximately 30 stores.
 
We expect fiscal 2011 interest expense to be approximately $2.5 million, due to commitment fees, the amortization of deferred financing costs and one month of interest associated with our senior subordinated notes, all of which were redeemed at 100 percent of par on March 1, 2010. See Note 6 — Financing, for further detail.
 
In order to minimize the earnings per share dilution that results from the issuance of shares under our equity incentive and employee stock purchase plans, we intend to make limited share repurchases during fiscal 2011 pursuant to our existing share repurchase authorization. We have approximately 936,000 shares remaining under this existing authorization. Our guidance does not reflect future share purchases.
 
Results of Operations
 
The following table sets forth our financial information through operating profit, expressed as a percentage of net sales. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes.
 
                         
    Fiscal Year-Ended  
    Jan 30, 2010     Jan 31, 2009     Feb 2, 2008  
 
Net sales
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
Gross margin
    49.0 %     46.4 %     46.4 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    39.9 %     40.8 %     41.2 %
Store pre-opening and closing costs
    0.6 %     0.6 %     0.4 %
Depreciation and amortization
    2.8 %     2.9 %     2.8 %
                         
Operating profit
    5.7 %     2.1 %     2.0 %
                         


26


 

Comparison of the 52 Weeks Ended January 30, 2010, January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008
 
Net sales.  Net sales represent retail sales, net of estimated returns and exclude sales taxes. The following tables summarize the year-over-year comparison of our consolidated net sales and sales by segment for the periods indicated:
 
Consolidated Net Sales:
 
                                         
                      Percentage
    Percentage
 
                      Change
    Change
 
(Dollars in millions)   FY10     FY09     FY08     FY10 vs. FY09     FY09 vs. FY08  
   
 
Consolidated net sales
    $1,990.7       $1,901.1       $1,878.8       4.7 %     1.2 %
Increase from prior year
    $89.6       $22.3                          
Same-store sales percentage change
    3.1 %     0.5 %     3.5 %                
 
 
 
Fiscal 2010:
 
Consolidated net sales increased for fiscal 2010.  With respect to our stores, same-store sales increased 3.1 percent compared with a same-store sales increase of 0.5 percent for fiscal 2009. The increase in fiscal 2010 same-store sales primarily was driven by an approximate 3.8 percent increase in customer transactions, our store remodel and optimization programs, more effective marketing and the benefit of competitive withdrawals in the sewing business. Our total store count at the end of the year of 746 was down 18 stores compared with fiscal 2009 and total store square footage decreased slightly from 16.0 million square feet at the end of fiscal 2009 to 15.9 million square feet at the end of fiscal 2010. In total, we opened 20 new stores and closed 38 stores during fiscal 2010, compared to fiscal 2009 when we opened 21 new stores and closed 31 stores.
 
Our sewing businesses represented 52 percent of our fiscal 2010 sales volume as compared to 51 percent of our fiscal 2009 sales volume. During fiscal 2010, our sewing businesses increased approximately 5.6 percent on a same-store sales basis as compared to an increase of approximately 3.9 percent during fiscal 2009. During fiscal 2010, we experienced positive same-store sales in the majority of our fabric and sewing notions merchandise categories, especially in quilting and sewing notions.
 
Our non-sewing businesses represented 48 percent of our fiscal 2010 sales volume compared to 49 percent of our fiscal 2009 sales volume. During fiscal 2010, our non-sewing businesses increased 0.3 percent on a same-store sales basis primarily due to sales in our core craft categories, particularly paper crafting, yarn and basic crafts. The increase in our non-sewing businesses was partially offset by a decline in seasonal categories.
 
Fiscal 2009:
 
Overall, consolidated net sales increased for fiscal 2009 primarily due to increased sales in our Joann.com entity. Fiscal 2009 represented our first full year of sales since we acquired the entity in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. With respect to our stores, same-store sales increased 0.5 percent compared with a same-store sales increase of 3.5 percent for fiscal 2008. The increase in fiscal 2009 same-store sales primarily was driven by an approximate 0.5 percent increase in average ticket due to a continuation of better in-stocks, more effective marketing and the benefit of competitive withdrawals in the sewing business. Our total store count at the end of the year of 764 was down ten stores compared with fiscal 2008; however, total store square footage increased slightly from 15.9 million square feet at the end of fiscal 2008 to 16.0 million square feet at the end of fiscal 2009. In total, we opened 21 new stores and closed 31 stores during fiscal 2009, compared to fiscal 2008 when we opened six new stores and closed 33 stores.
 
On a category basis, our sewing businesses represented 51 percent of our fiscal 2009 sales volume as compared to 50 percent of our fiscal 2008 sales volume. During fiscal 2009, our sewing businesses increased approximately 3.9 percent on a same-store sales basis as compared to an increase of approximately 5.6 percent during fiscal 2008. During fiscal 2009, we experienced positive same-store sales in the majority of our fabric and sewing notions merchandise categories, especially in quilting and fleece.


27


 

Our non-sewing businesses represented 49 percent of our fiscal 2009 sales volume compared to 50 percent of our fiscal 2008 sales volume. During fiscal 2009, our non-sewing businesses decreased 3.4 percent on a same-store sales basis primarily due to sales declines in seasonal categories. Excluding seasonal categories, craft same-store sales were slightly positive during fiscal 2009, with particular strength in the yarn and basic craft shops.
 
Sales by Segment:
 
                                         
                      Percentage
    Percentage
 
                      Change
    Change
 
(Dollars in millions)   FY10     FY09     FY08     FY10 vs. FY09     FY09 vs. FY08  
   
 
Large-format stores
                                       
Net sales
    $1,072.9       $997.7       $989.4       7.5 %     0.8 %
Increase from prior year
    $75.2       $8.3                          
Same-store sales percentage change
    1.4 %     (1.0 )%     3.9 %                
 
 
Small-format stores
                                       
Net sales
    $879.9       $867.7       $877.5       1.4 %     (1.1 )%
Increase (decrease) from prior year
    $12.2       $(9.8 )                        
Same-store sales percentage change
    5.1 %     2.1 %     3.0 %                
 
 
Other
                                       
Net sales
    $37.9       $35.7       $11.9       6.2 %     200.0 %
Increase from prior year
    $2.2       $23.8                          
 
 
 
Fiscal 2010:
 
Sales for large-format stores increased for fiscal 2010 primarily due to the net increase in the number of new stores and positive same-store sales.
 
Same-store sales for large-format stores increased 1.4 percent for fiscal 2010, versus a same-store sales decrease of 1.0 percent for the same period last year. Our large-format stores performed well; however, they have a greater mix of seasonal product and higher ticket items compared to our small-format stores, which negatively impacted their same-store sales during fiscal 2010. Customer transactions for large-format stores increased by approximately 3.4 percent while average ticket decreased 2.0 percent. Large-format stores accounted for 53.9 percent and 52.5 percent of total net sales during fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively.
 
The number of large-format stores increased to 228 from 210 in fiscal 2009, which is the net result of 15 new stores and six small-format stores that were reclassified as large-format stores due to remodeling efforts during fiscal 2010, less the closing of three large-format stores.
 
Sales for small-format stores increased for fiscal 2010 due to the increase in same-store sales, partially offset by the decrease in store count. We continued to see the ongoing benefits from store remodels and optimizations in our small-format stores during fiscal 2010.
 
The number of small-format stores decreased to 518 in fiscal 2010 from 554 in the prior year, which is the net result of the opening of five new small-format stores, the closing of 35 small-format stores and the previously mentioned reclassification of six small-format stores to large-format stores during the year.
 
Same-store sales performance for small-format stores increased 5.1 percent for fiscal 2010 versus a same-store sales increase of 2.1 percent for fiscal 2009. The fiscal 2010 increase in same-store sales for small-format stores was due to an approximate 4.2 percent increase in customer transactions combined with an approximate 0.9 percent increase in average ticket. Small-format stores accounted for 44.2 percent and 45.6 percent of total net sales during fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively.
 
Sales included in our “other” segment represent sales from Joann.com, which was acquired in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.


28


 

Fiscal 2009:
 
Sales for large-format stores increased for fiscal 2009 primarily due to the net increase in the number of new stores, partially offset by negative same-store sales.
 
Same-store sales for large-format stores decreased 1.0 percent for fiscal 2009, versus a same-store sales increase of 3.9 percent for fiscal 2008. Large-format stores have a greater mix of seasonal product and higher ticket items compared to our small-format stores, which contributed to the weaker performance of the large-format stores during fiscal 2009. Customer transactions and average ticket for large-format stores decreased by approximately 0.6 percent and 0.4 percent, respectively. Large-format stores accounted for 52.5 percent and 52.7 percent of total net sales during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively.
 
The number of large-format stores increased to 210 from 196 in fiscal 2009, which is the net result of eleven new stores and five small-format stores that were reclassified as large-format stores due to remodeling efforts during fiscal 2009, less the closing of two large-format stores.
 
Sales for small-format stores decreased for fiscal 2009 due to the decrease in total store count, partially offset by the increase in same-store sales.
 
The number of small-format stores decreased to 554 in fiscal 2009 from 578 in the prior year, which is the net result of the closing of 29 small-format stores, the opening of ten new small-format stores and the previously mentioned reclassification of five small-format stores to large-format stores during the year.
 
Same-store sales performance for small-format stores increased 2.1 percent for fiscal 2009 versus a same-store sales increase of 3.0 percent for fiscal 2008. The fiscal 2009 increase in same-store sales for small-format stores was due to an approximate 1.8 percent increase in average ticket combined with an approximate 0.3 percent increase in customer transactions. Small-format stores accounted for 45.6 percent and 46.7 percent of total net sales during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively.
 
Sales included in our “other” segment represent sales from Joann.com, which was acquired in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. The increase in sales for fiscal 2009 is attributable to experiencing a full year of sales from Joann.com as compared to one quarter in fiscal 2008.
 
Gross Margin:
 
                                                         
                      Percentage
    Percentage
             
                      Change
    Change
             
(Dollars in millions)   FY10     FY09     FY08     FY10 vs. FY09     FY09 vs. FY08              
   
 
Gross margin
    $975.7       $882.5       $872.4       10.6 %     1.2 %                
Increase from prior year
    $93.2       $10.1                                          
Percentage of consolidated net sales
    49.0 %     46.4 %     46.4 %     260 bps                        
 
 
 
Gross margin increased for fiscal 2010 in relation to the increase in net sales. As a percent of net sales, gross margin increased 260 basis points compared with fiscal 2009. The improvement in the gross margin rate for fiscal 2010 primarily was due to reduced product costs from global sourcing, product cost deflation on imports and new systems capabilities. In addition, our seasonal sell-through for the holiday season during fiscal 2010 was better than the prior year and allowed us to sell through seasonal product earlier in the season, resulting in improved margins.
 
Gross margin increased for fiscal 2009 in relation to the increase in net sales. As a percent of net sales, gross margin was flat compared with fiscal 2008. The margin rate during the first nine months of fiscal 2009 was up as compared to the same time period of fiscal 2008, but markdowns taken during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 resulted in comparable gross margin rates year-over-year. In order to ensure a reasonable sell-through of seasonal merchandise during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we elected to take pricing actions on seasonal products earlier in the fourth quarter as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses.  SG&A expenses include store and administrative payroll, employee benefits, stock-based compensation, certain distribution costs, store occupancy costs, advertising


29


 

expenses and administrative expenses. Some of our competitors and other retailers include distribution costs and store occupancy costs in gross margin. The types of distribution costs that we classify as selling, general and administrative expense include administrative, occupancy, depreciation, labor and other indirect costs that are incurred to support the distribution network. These costs are not directly associated with the value of the merchandise sold in our stores, but rather they relate primarily to the handling of merchandise for delivery to our stores and are expensed as incurred.
 
Distribution costs included within SG&A amounted to $49.0 million, $54.3 million and $59.5 million for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Store occupancy costs included within SG&A amounted to $186.6 million, $180.5 million and $178.2 million for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses:
 
                                                         
                      Percentage
    Percentage
             
                      Change
    Change
             
(Dollars in millions)   FY10     FY09     FY08     FY10 vs. FY09     FY09 vs. FY08              
   
 
SG&A
    $793.6       $775.3       $774.8       2.4 %     0.1 %                
Increase from prior year
    $18.3       $0.5                                          
Percentage of consolidated net sales
    39.9 %     40.8 %     41.2 %     (90 bps )     (40 bps )                
 
 
 
SG&A for fiscal 2010 decreased as a percentage of net sales. Our improved SG&A leverage reflects our continued focus on controlling costs, which have increased by 2.4 percent during fiscal 2010, while, for the same period, net sales increased by 4.7 percent as compared to fiscal 2009.
 
Stock-based compensation expense, which is included within SG&A, was $10.9 million for fiscal 2010, compared with $9.4 million in fiscal 2009. Included within stock-based compensation expense for fiscal 2010 is $1.9 million related to the Stock Value Bonus Plan.
 
SG&A for fiscal 2009 decreased as a percentage of net sales primarily due to our continued efforts to control expenses. The additional full year sales during fiscal 2009 from Joann.com, which has a lower expense structure than the retail stores, also contributed to the improved leverage. Fiscal 2008 only included three months of sales from Joann.com because the acquisition of the Internet business was not finalized until the beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.
 
Stock-based compensation expense, which is included within SG&A, was $9.4 million for fiscal 2009, compared with $8.3 million in fiscal 2008.
 
Store pre-opening and closing costs.  Pre-opening costs are expensed as incurred. These costs include lease costs recognized prior to the store opening, hiring and training costs for new employees and processing of initial merchandise. Store closing costs, which are also expensed as incurred, consist of lease termination costs, lease costs for closed locations, loss on disposal of fixtures and equipment, severance for employees, third-party inventory liquidator costs and other costs incidental to store closings.


30


 

Store pre-opening and closing costs:
 
                                         
                      Percentage
    Percentage
 
                      Change
    Change
 
(Dollars in millions)   FY10     FY09     FY08     FY10 vs. FY09     FY09 vs. FY08  
   
 
Store pre-opening and closing costs
  $ 11.7     $ 12.3     $ 8.4       (4.9 )%     46.4 %
(Decrease) increase from prior year
  $ (0.6 )   $ 3.9                          
Percentage of consolidated net sales
    0.6 %     0.6 %     0.4 %           20 bps  
 
 
Store pre-opening costs
  $ 5.5     $ 7.8     $ 3.1       (29.5 )%     151.6 %
(Decrease) increase from prior year
  $ (2.3 )   $ 4.7                          
Stores opened
    20       21       6                  
 
 
Store closing costs
  $ 6.2     $ 4.5     $ 5.3       37.8 %     (15.1 )%
Increase (decrease) from prior year
  $ 1.7     $ (0.8 )                        
Stores closed
    38       31       33                  
 
 
 
Store pre-opening and closing costs decreased in fiscal 2010. Pre-opening costs decreased during fiscal 2010 due to fewer store openings as well as the timing of the opening of the new stores in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009. Store closing costs increased during fiscal 2010 since we closed seven more stores in fiscal 2010 compared with fiscal 2009.
 
Store pre-opening and closing costs increased in fiscal 2009, due to a net increase in new store activity during fiscal 2009. Pre-opening costs increased during fiscal 2009 since we opened more stores in fiscal 2009 than in fiscal 2008. Store closing costs decreased during fiscal 2009 since we closed fewer stores in fiscal 2009 compared with fiscal 2008.
 
Depreciation and amortization.  Depreciation and amortization expense increased $2.1 million to $56.3 million in fiscal 2010. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense during fiscal 2010 was due to incremental depreciation associated with fiscal 2009 and 2010 expenditures related to technology as well as spending on new stores and remodels.
 
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $2.4 million to $54.2 million in fiscal 2009. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense during fiscal 2009 was due to incremental depreciation associated with our investment in new store systems and store related expenditures, including store remodels and new store openings.
 
Operating profit:
 
                                         
                      Percentage
    Percentage
 
                      Change
    Change
 
 (Dollars in millions)   FY10     FY09     FY08     FY10 vs. FY09     FY09 vs. FY08  
   
 
Operating profit
  $ 114.1     $ 40.7     $ 37.4       180.3 %     8.8 %
Increase from prior year
  $ 73.4     $ 3.3                          
Percentage of consolidated net sales
    5.7 %     2.1 %     2.0 %     360 bps       10 bps  
 
 
 
Operating profit for fiscal 2010 increased primarily due to the increase in same-store sales, improvement in gross margin and our continued efforts to control expenses.
 
Operating profit for fiscal 2009 increased primarily due to the improvement in large-format store operating profit combined with our continued efforts to control expenses.


31


 

Operating profit (loss) by Segment:
 
                                         
                      Percentage
    Percentage
 
                      Change
    Change
 
 (dollars in millions)   FY10     FY09     FY08     FY10 vs. FY09     FY09 vs. FY08  
   
 
Large-format stores
                                       
Operating profit
  $ 119.6     $ 69.1     $ 67.2       73.1 %     2.8 %
Increase from prior year
  $ 50.5     $ 1.9                          
 
 
Small-format stores
                                       
Operating profit
  $ 128.4     $ 95.9     $ 96.4       33.9 %     (0.5 )%
Increase (decrease) from prior year
  $ 32.5     $ (0.5 )                        
 
 
Other
                                       
Operating loss
  $ (133.9 )   $ (124.3 )   $ (126.2 )     (7.7 )%     1.5 %
(Increase) decrease from prior year
  $ (9.6 )   $ 1.9                          
 
 
 
Fiscal 2010:
 
The improvement in large-format store operating profit was driven primarily by the $75.2 million increase in store sales volume, which was primarily due to the net increase in the number of new stores, combined with improvement in gross margin and our continued efforts to control expenses.
 
The improvement in small-format store operating profit was driven primarily by a 5.1 percent increase in same-store sales, which was due partially to the store remodels and optimizations that occurred during fiscal 2010, combined with improvement in gross margin and our continued efforts to control expenses.
 
The increase in operating loss during fiscal 2010 of our other segment is primarily due to an increase in incentive compensation expense based on our current year performance. The other segment includes unallocated corporate overhead in addition to the operating results of our Internet business.
 
Fiscal 2009:
 
The improvement in large-format store operating profit was primarily driven by the $8.3 million increase in store sales volume. The decline in operating profit of the small-format stores was driven by a $9.8 million decrease in sales volume. The sales volume fluctuation between large-format and small-format stores is due to the net overall 14 new large-format stores that were opened during fiscal 2009 as compared to a net 24 small-format store decrease during the year. The improvement in operating loss during fiscal 2009 of our other segment is primarily due to our continued efforts to control expenses. The other segment includes unallocated corporate overhead in addition to the operating results of our Internet business.
 
Gain on purchase of senior subordinated notes.  During fiscal 2010, we recorded a pre-tax gain of $1.3 million as a result of the purchase of $18.5 million of our 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes at an average of 92 percent of par, net of the related write-off of applicable deferred financing costs. During fiscal 2009 we recorded a pre-tax gain of $4.2 million, as a result of the purchase of $34.0 million of our 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes at an average of 87 percent of par, net of the related write-off of applicable deferred financing costs.
 
Interest expense.  Interest expense for fiscal 2010 decreased $3.1 million to $6.3 million. The decrease is attributable to lower average debt levels. Our average debt levels were $50 million in fiscal 2010 versus $101 million in the prior year. Interest expense for fiscal 2009 decreased $3.1 million to $9.4 million. The decrease was attributable to lower average debt levels. Our average debt levels were $101 million in fiscal 2009 versus $145 million in the prior year.
 
Income taxes.  Our effective income tax rate for fiscal 2010 increased to 39.0 percent from 38.3 percent in fiscal 2009. The increase in the effective tax rate is based primarily on the net effect of changes to our state and local tax positions. Our effective rate is subject to change based on the mix of income from different


32


 

state jurisdictions, which tax at different rates, as well as the change in status or outcome of uncertain tax positions.
 
Our effective income tax rate for fiscal 2009 increased to 38.3 percent from 38.1 percent in fiscal 2008. The increase in the effective tax rate was based primarily on the net effect of changes to our deferred tax assets and to our reserves for uncertain tax positions. Our effective rate is subject to change based on the mix of income from different state jurisdictions, which tax at different rates, as well as the change in status or outcome of uncertain tax positions.
 
Store Closing Charges
 
Expenses recorded relating to store closings were $6.2 million, $4.5 million and $5.3 million in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These charges are included in the line item “Store pre-opening and closing costs” in our statements of operations included in our consolidated financial statements.
 
The store closing reserve was $0.7 million and $0.6 million as of January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively. The reserve is comprised of miscellaneous liquidation costs, which are incurred but not paid.
 
Stock-Based Compensation
 
In fiscal 2010, we granted 165,634 performance shares, 489,340 time-based restricted shares and 278,702 non-qualified stock options to team members at the Vice President level and above. Beginning in fiscal 2010, employees below the Vice President level who participate in the Long-Term Incentive (“LTI”) program receive, instead of restricted shares (and in some cases performance shares) that such employees formerly received, a cash settled payment under the Stock Value Bonus Plan.
 
The Stock Value Bonus Plan takes the participant’s LTI value and converts it to units based on the closing stock price at the grant date. At the end of the fiscal year, the closing stock price on the third business day following the year-end earnings release is multiplied times the number of units to determine the actual LTI incentive, which is limited to 150 percent of the fair market value of the underlying common shares on the grant date. The value will be locked in and will be paid in equal installments over a two or three-year vesting period if the grantee remains in the continuous service of the company throughout the vesting period.
 
In fiscal 2009, we granted 105,580 performance shares and 584,853 non-qualified stock options to the Vice President level and above, and 370,877 time-based restricted shares to team members at the manager level and above.
 
In fiscal 2008, we granted 5,633 performance shares to the Vice President level and above, and 172,435 time-based restricted shares and 660,173 non-qualified stock options to team members at the manager level and above. However, we did not grant any time-based restricted shares to our executive officers with the exception of 31,847 shares granted to a new executive officer in connection with his commencement of employment and which are included in the 172,435 shares mentioned above.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Our capital requirements are primarily for capital expenditures in connection with infrastructure investments, new store openings, store remodel activity and working capital requirements for seasonal inventory builds and new store inventory purchases. Working capital requirements needed to finance our operations fluctuate during the year and reach their highest levels during the third fiscal quarter as we increase our inventory in preparation for our peak selling season during the months of September through December. These requirements are funded through a combination of internally generated cash flows from operations, credit extended by suppliers and borrowings under our credit facility.


33


 

The following table provides cash flow related information for the three fiscal years ended January 30, 2010.
 
                         
    2010     2009     2008  
    (In millions)  
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 184.0     $ 157.9     $ 73.6  
Net cash used for investing activities
    (42.8 )     (77.8 )     (49.4 )
Net cash used for financing activities
    (4.7 )     (24.9 )     (17.2 )
                         
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
  $ 136.5     $ 55.2     $ 7.0  
                         
Ending cash and cash equivalents
  $ 217.1     $ 80.6     $ 25.4  
                         
 
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities
 
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $26.1 million in fiscal 2010. The year-over-year increase in cash provided by operations was attributable primarily to a $44.7 million increase in net income for fiscal 2010 as compared to fiscal 2009.
 
Inventories decreased in fiscal 2010 by $12.6 million, primarily due to reductions occurring in our fashion and seasonal inventories. Average store level inventory was down 0.8 percent with the balance of the inventory reduction coming out of our distribution centers. During fiscal 2010, we maintained consistent store in-stocks and had no holiday merchandise carryover at year end. Inventory turns for fiscal 2010 were approximately 2.4 compared with 2.3 in fiscal 2009.
 
Total operating assets and liabilities in fiscal 2010 increased by $48.5 million, which is net of landlord allowances of $10.5 million and is primarily the result of a $28.8 million increase in accrued expenses combined with a $12.6 million decrease in inventories. The increase in accrued expenses is primarily the result of a $14.5 million increase in accrued compensation and $9.8 million increase in accrued taxes, both of which are directly related to our improved performance during fiscal 2010. We negotiate landlord allowances as we build certain new store locations. See the discussion under “Capital Expenditures” below.
 
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $84.3 million in fiscal 2009. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2009 primarily was attributable to the decrease in inventories and increase in accounts payable.
 
Inventories decreased by $42.8 million in fiscal 2009, compared with an increase of $18.8 million in fiscal 2008. The decrease in inventory primarily is due to our inventory initiatives to reduce seasonal and fashion merchandise. Average store level inventory was down 5.0 percent with the balance of the inventory reduction coming out of our distribution centers. During fiscal 2009, we maintained consistent store in-stocks and had no holiday merchandise carryover at year end. Inventory turns for fiscal 2009 were approximately 2.3 compared with 2.2 in fiscal 2008.
 
Total operating assets and liabilities in fiscal 2009 increased by $66.1 million, which is net of landlord allowances of $11.1 million and is primarily the result of a $42.8 million reduction in inventory combined with a $15.7 million increase in accounts payable. We negotiate landlord allowances as we build certain new store locations.
 
Net Cash Used For Investing Activities
 
Net cash used for investing activities in fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009 consisted of capital expenditures and a delayed payment related to the fiscal 2008 acquisition of the remaining equity of Joann.com. Net cash used for investing activities in fiscal 2008 was comprised of capital expenditures of $37.7 million and the initial cash purchase price of the acquisition of the remaining equity of Joann.com of $11.7 million (net of cash acquired).


34


 

Capital Expenditures
 
Capital expenditures estimated for fiscal 2011 and for the last three fiscal years consist of cash expenditures and cash expenditures reimbursed by our landlords. Capital expenditures primarily relate to the operation of the stores, including new store openings and information technology. We also incur capital outlays for distribution center equipment and other non-store capital investments. Landlord reimbursed capital expenditures represent the cost of assets acquired with landlord lease incentives. Capital expenditures are summarized as follows:
 
                                 
    2011
                   
    Outlook     2010     2009     2008  
    (In millions)  
 
Cash
  $ 50.0     $ 29.2     $ 63.6     $ 28.6  
Cash — landlord-reimbursed
    14.0       10.5       11.1       9.1  
                                 
Total
  $ 64.0     $ 39.7     $ 74.7     $ 37.7  
                                 
 
Capital expenditures for fiscal 2010 totaled $39.7 million. Store-related expenditures, including those for our store openings, accounted for approximately 76 percent, or $30.3 million, of total capital spending in fiscal 2010. Expenditures related to technology accounted for approximately 16 percent, or $6.4 million, of total capital spending in fiscal 2010. During fiscal 2010, we opened 15 large-format and five small-format stores and remodeled 30 stores.
 
Capital expenditures for fiscal 2009 totaled $74.7 million. Store-related expenditures, including those for our store openings, accounted for approximately 65 percent, or $48.7 million, of total capital spending in fiscal 2009. Expenditures related to technology accounted for approximately 31 percent, or $23.3 million, of total capital spending in fiscal 2009. During fiscal 2009, we opened 11 large-format and ten small-format stores and remodeled 29 stores.
 
Capital expenditures for fiscal 2008 totaled $37.7 million. Store-related expenditures, including those for store openings, accounted for approximately 70 percent, or $26.4 million, of total capital spending in fiscal 2008. Expenditures related to technology accounted for approximately 23 percent, or $8.7 million, of total capital spending in fiscal 2008. During fiscal 2008, we opened six large-format stores and remodeled 26 stores.
 
We anticipate that capital expenditures in fiscal 2011 will be approximately $64 million, or $50 million net of landlord allowances received. We plan to open approximately 30 new stores. We also plan to remodel at least 40 stores.
 
Net Cash Used For Financing Activities
 
Net cash used for financing activities was $4.7 million in fiscal 2010 compared with $24.9 million in fiscal 2009. Debt at the end of fiscal 2010 was $47.5 million and consisted of our 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes. Debt levels decreased $18.5 million during fiscal 2010, compared with a net decrease of $34.0 million in the prior year. During fiscal 2010, we purchased $18.5 million in face value of the senior subordinated notes at an average of 92 percent of par. We recorded a pre-tax gain of $1.3 million, representing the cash discount received net of the related write-off of applicable deferred financing costs. These charges are reflected in the gain on purchase of senior subordinated notes line item in the statement of operations.
 
On March 1, 2010, the company redeemed all outstanding principal amount of its 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes of approximately $47.5 million at par early, which was announced on January 5, 2010. As such, the company has classified the senior subordinated notes as short-term as of January 30, 2010.
 
Net cash used for financing activities was $24.9 million in fiscal 2009 compared with $17.2 million in fiscal 2008. Long-term debt at the end of fiscal 2009 was $66.0 million and consisted of our 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes. Debt levels decreased $34.0 million during fiscal 2009, compared with a net decrease of $25.3 million in the prior year. During fiscal 2009, we purchased $34.0 million in face value of the notes at an average of 87 percent of par. We recorded a pre-tax gain of $4.2 million, representing the cash discount


35


 

received net of the related write-off of applicable deferred financing costs. These charges are reflected in the gain on purchase of notes line item in the statement of operations.
 
As of January 30, 2010, we had the ability to borrow up to an additional $242.5 million under our Amended Credit Facility.
 
Common Share Repurchases
 
During fiscal 2010, we purchased 106,213 of our common shares at an aggregate price of $1.8 million, which represented shares repurchased from employees to satisfy minimum statutory tax withholding requirements in connection with the vesting of restricted shares. As of January 30, 2010, we were authorized to purchase up to an additional 936,053 common shares under the existing authorization from our Board of Directors.
 
Sources of Liquidity
 
We have three principal sources of liquidity: cash from operations, cash and cash equivalents on hand and our Amended Credit Facility.
 
We believe that our cash and cash equivalents on hand, cash from operations and availability under our Amended Credit Facility will be sufficient to cover our working capital, capital expenditure and debt service requirement needs for the foreseeable future.
 
Our liquidity is based, in part, on our debt ratings. As of the end of fiscal 2010, our long-term unsecured debt was rated “B2” by Moody’s Investor Services and “B−” by Standard & Poor’s. Both Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s rate our outlook as stable. In September 2009, Moody’s raised our rating on our long-term unsecured debt from “B3” to “B2” with a stable outlook. Moody’s attributes the change in ratings to the material improvement in our financial profile, operating performance and our ability to continue to generate positive free cash flow. In May 2009, Standard & Poor’s raised our rating from “CCC+” to “B−” with a stable outlook. The change in ratings by Standard & Poor’s reflects its view that our operating results have improved and the expectation that working capital, free cash flow and debt protection measures will continue to improve. In assessing our credit strength, both Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s consider our capital structure and financial policies, as well as our consolidated balance sheet and other financial information. Downgrades of our credit ratings could adversely impact, among other things, our future borrowing costs, access to capital markets and new store operating lease costs, although we anticipate no short-term effect under our current credit arrangements.
 
Our debt obligations as of the end of fiscal 2010 represent $47.5 million outstanding under our 7.5 percent Notes.
 
Secured Bank Credit Facility.  On September 5, 2008, we entered into the Amended Credit Facility by amending certain terms and extending the maturity of our Credit Facility, originally entered into as of April 24, 2001. The Amended Credit Facility, which expires on September 5, 2013, is a $300 million revolver with Bank of America, N.A. and seven other lenders and is secured by a first priority security interest in our inventory, accounts receivable, personal property and other assets and is guaranteed by certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. We have the option to request an increase in the size of the Amended Credit Facility up to $100 million (for a total facility of $400 million) in increments of $25 million, provided that no default exists or would arise from the increase. However, the lenders under the Amended Credit Facility are not under any obligation to provide any such additional increments. Interest on borrowings under the Amended Credit Facility is calculated at the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.75 percent to 2.25 percent or the bank’s base rate plus 0.75 percent to 1.25 percent, both of which are dependent on the level of average excess availability during the previous fiscal month. The Amended Credit Facility contains a sub-limit for letters of credit of $200 million. Deferred financing costs of $2.3 million, of which $0.4 million relates to the unamortized portion of the deferred financing costs of the previous Credit Facility, are being amortized over the term of the Amended Credit Facility. As of January 30, 2010, we had $18.4 million in standby letters of credit outstanding under the Amended Credit Facility.


36


 

We did not borrow on the Amended Credit Facility during fiscal 2010. Our weighted average interest rate and weighted average borrowings under the Amended Credit Facility were 6.1 percent and $8.1 million during fiscal 2009.
 
The Amended Credit Facility contains customary covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness or guarantee obligations, engage in mergers or consolidations, dispose of assets, make investments, acquisitions, loans or advances, engage in certain transactions with affiliates, create liens, or change the nature of our business. We are restricted in our ability to prepay or modify the terms of other indebtedness, pay dividends and make other distributions when excess availability, which represents net borrowing capacity, falls below certain levels. Further, we are required to comply with a minimum fixed charge ratio covenant, if excess availability is less than ten percent of the borrowing base at any time. As of January 30, 2010, excess availability was $242.5 million. The Amended Credit Facility also defines various events of default, including cross-default provisions, defaults for any material judgments or a change in control. At January 30, 2010, we were in compliance with all covenants under the Amended Credit Facility. Failure to comply with these restrictions and covenants could result in defaults under our Amended Credit Facility. Any default, if not waived, could result in our debt becoming immediately due and payable.
 
In November 2007, we amended our Credit Facility to allow for the acquisition of the remaining equity of IdeaForest.com, Inc., which was renamed Joann.com, Inc. after acquisition and subsequently converted to a limited liability company named joann.com, LLC.
 
Senior Subordinated Notes.  On February 26, 2004, we issued $100 million 7.5 percent notes due 2012. Interest on the notes was payable on March 1 and September 1 of each year. Deferred financing costs recorded at issuance of $2.6 million are reflected in other long-term assets and are being amortized as interest expense over the term of the notes utilizing the effective interest method. Beginning March 1, 2008, we had the option of redeeming the notes at any time, in accordance with certain call provisions of the related note indenture. The notes represented unsecured obligations that were subordinated to the Amended Credit Facility and were fully and unconditionally guaranteed by certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries.
 
During fiscal 2010, we purchased $18.5 million in face value of the 7.5 percent notes at an average of 92 percent of par. We recorded a pre-tax gain of $1.3 million representing the cash discount received net of the related write-off of applicable deferred financing costs. This pre-tax gain is reflected on the gain on purchase of senior subordinated notes line item in the statement of operations.
 
During fiscal 2009, we purchased $34.0 million in face value of the 7.5 percent notes at an average of 87 percent of par. We recorded a pre-tax gain of $4.2 million representing the cash discount received net of the related write-off of applicable deferred financing costs. This pre-tax gain is reflected on the gain on purchase of senior subordinated notes line item in the statement of operations.
 
The market price of the 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes at January 30, 2010 in the high yield debt market was approximately at par value. Accordingly, the fair value of the notes approximated the carrying value of approximately $47.5 million.
 
Subsequent to fiscal 2010 and as of March 1, 2010, we redeemed all of the outstanding principal amount of our 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes at 100 percent of par and as a result, we have classified the balance of the senior subordinated notes as a current liability at January 30, 2010.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Transactions
 
Our liquidity is not dependent on the use of off-balance sheet transactions other than letters of credit and operating leases, which are typical in a retail environment.


37


 

Contractual Obligation and Commitments
 
The following table summarizes our future cash outflows resulting from contractual obligations and commitments as of January 30, 2010:
 
                                         
    Payments Due by Period (1)  
          Less than
                After
 
    Total     1 year     1-3 years     4-5 years     5 years  
    (In millions)  
 
7.5 percent senior subordinated notes(1)
  $ 47.5     $ 47.5     $     $     $  
7.5 percent senior subordinated notes accrued interest(2)
    1.8       1.8                    
Standby letters of credit
    18.4       18.4                    
Purchase commitments(3)
    16.0       2.9       9.7       3.4        
Royalty commitments(4)
    1.2       1.1       0.1              
Agent fee commitments(5)
    6.8       6.8                    
Operating leases
    827.0       151.9       264.6       196.8       213.7  
Uncertain tax positions(6)
                             
Promissory notes(7)
    2.4       2.4                    
Amended Credit Facility
                             
                                         
Total Contractual Cash Obligations
  $ 921.1     $ 232.8     $ 274.4     $ 200.2     $ 213.7  
                                         
 
 
(1) On March 1, 2010, we elected to redeem all outstanding principal amount of our 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes of approximately $47.5 million at 100 percent of the principal amount early, which was announced on January 5, 2010. As such, we classified the senior subordinated notes as short-term as of January 30, 2010.
 
(2) Interest is included as a contractual obligation on the 7.5 percent Notes only. The calculation of interest on the Amended Credit Facility is dependent on the average borrowings during the year and a variable interest rate. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources — Sources of Liquidity” for further discussion of the Amended Credit Facility.
 
(3) Purchase commitments include legally binding contracts such as firm commitments for significant inventory purchases. Purchase orders that are not binding agreements are excluded from the table.
 
(4) Royalty commitments include guaranteed minimum royalty payments to various designers for use of their name and product line and is based off a guaranteed minimum sales figure per year.
 
(5) Agent fee commissions include minimum commission fees for sourcing import purchases.
 
(6) We have approximately $7.0 million in uncertain tax positions. However, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the period of cash settlement with the respective taxing authorities and, therefore, have not included this amount in the contractual obligations table. See Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.
 
(7) Represents delayed payments in relation to the Joann.com acquisition.
 
Seasonality and Inflation
 
Our business exhibits seasonality, which is typical for most retail companies. Our sales are stronger in the second half of the year than the first half of the year. Net earnings are highest during the months of September through December when sales volumes provide significant operating leverage. Working capital requirements needed to finance our operations fluctuate during the year and reach their highest levels during the second and third fiscal quarters as we increase our inventory in preparation for our peak selling season during the fourth quarter.


38


 

Summarized below are key line items by quarter from our statements of operations and balance sheets:
 
                                                                   
    Fiscal 2010       Fiscal 2009  
    Qtr 1     Qtr 2     Qtr 3     Qtr 4       Qtr 1     Qtr 2     Qtr 3     Qtr 4  
    (In millions)  
Net sales
  $ 460.0     $ 419.4     $ 509.1     $ 602.2       $ 446.1     $ 403.0     $ 480.1     $ 571.9  
Same-store sales percentage change
    1.0 %     1.8 %     4.3 %     4.4 %       4.5 %     3.3 %     (1.5 )%     (2.9 )%
Gross margin
  $ 222.9     $ 206.6     $ 259.8     $ 286.4       $ 206.8     $ 191.8     $ 235.3     $ 248.6  
Gross margin percent to sales
    48.5 %     49.3 %     51.0 %     47.6 %       46.4 %     47.6 %     49.0 %     43.5 %
Operating profit (loss)
  $ 14.9     $ (3.4 )   $ 41.5     $ 61.1       $ 7.4     $ (16.5 )   $ 17.3     $ 32.5  
Operating profit (loss) percent to sales
    3.2 %     (0.8 )%     8.2 %     10.1 %       1.7 %     (4.1 )%     3.6 %     5.7 %
Net income (loss)
  $ 8.6     $ (3.2 )   $ 24.1     $ 37.1       $ 3.0     $ (11.7 )   $ 10.2     $ 20.4  
Inventories
    406.6       460.1       485.4       416.8         426.9       472.6       522.3       429.4  
Debt
    50.5       50.5       47.5       47.5         100.0       100.0       112.7       66.0  
 
We believe that inflation has not had a significant effect on the growth of net sales or on net income (loss) over the past three years. There can be no assurance, however, that our operating results will not be affected by inflation in the future.
 
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
We strive to report our financial results in a clear and understandable manner. We follow generally accepted accounting principles in preparing our consolidated financial statements. These principles require us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on other assumptions that we believe to be relevant under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from these estimates under different assumptions and/or conditions. We continually evaluate the information used to make these estimates as our business and the economic environment changes. The use of estimates is pervasive throughout our financial statements. The accounting policies that involve estimates or assumptions that are material due to levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or are susceptible to change and we consider most critical are as follows:
 
Inventory Valuation
 
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined on a weighted average basis. Inventory valuation methods require certain management estimates and judgments, the most significant of which involves estimates of net realizable value on product designated for clearance, which affects the ending inventory valuation at cost, as well as the gross margin reported for the year.
 
We estimate our reserve for clearance product based on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, quantities of slow moving or carryover seasonal merchandise on hand, historical recovery statistics and future merchandising plans. The accuracy of our estimates can be affected by many factors, some of which are beyond our control, including changes in economic conditions and consumer buying trends. The corresponding reduction to gross margin is recorded in the period the decision is made.
 
We do not believe that the assumptions used in our estimate will change significantly based on prior experience. A one percent increase or decrease in the clearance reserve would have impacted operating profit by approximately $0.2 million for the year ended January 30, 2010.
 
Our accrual for shrink is estimated as a percent of sales. The percent used in the determination of the accrual is based on actual historical shrink results of our stores. This estimated percent is applied to sales of our stores for the periods following the stores’ most recent physical inventory. In addition, we analyze our


39


 

accrual using actual results as physical inventory counts are taken and reconciled to the general ledger. Substantially all of our store physical inventory counts are taken in the first three quarters of each year. All store locations that have been open one year or longer are physically inventoried once a year. A ten basis point increase or decrease in the estimated shrink percent would have impacted operating profit by approximately $1.4 million for the year ended January 30, 2010.
 
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill
 
We evaluate recoverability of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable (for example, when a store’s performance falls below minimum company standards). In the fourth quarter of each fiscal year or earlier if indicators of impairment exist, we review the performance of individual stores. Underperforming stores are selected for further evaluation of the recoverability of the stores’ net asset values. If the evaluation, done on an undiscounted cash flow basis, indicates that a store’s net asset value may not be recoverable, the potential impairment is measured as the excess of carrying value over the fair value of the impaired asset. We estimate fair value based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate that is considered to be commensurate with the risk inherent in our current business model. Additional factors are taken into consideration, such as local market conditions and operating environment.
 
Impairment losses totaling $2.4 million, $2.0 million and $0.6 million in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, were recorded for underperforming stores, underutilized assets and/or other facilities. If different assumptions were made or different market conditions were present, any estimated potential impairment amounts could have varied from recorded amounts.
 
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we conducted the annual impairment testing on our goodwill acquired in the Joann.com acquisition. We consider the Joann.com entity to be a stand alone operating segment and reporting unit as discrete financial information is available at this level. As such, we tested our goodwill for impairment at this level. The impairment evaluation process is an income-based approach that utilizes discounted cash flows for the determination of the enterprise fair value of Joann.com. This process requires significant judgments, including estimation of future cash flows, which is dependent on internal forecasts, estimation of the long-term rate of growth for our business, estimation of the useful life over which cash flows will occur, and determination of our weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”). Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the determination of fair value and goodwill impairment for each reporting unit. As a result of our impairment analysis, we determined that our goodwill was not impaired for fiscal 2010. We used 14.5 percent for WACC for fiscal 2010. A one percent change in the WACC rate represents an approximate $1.5 million change to the enterprise fair value of Joann.com. A one percent change in the terminal growth rate and long-term growth rate represents an approximate combined $1.0 million change to the enterprise fair value. Neither assumption change would have resulted in an impairment for goodwill. Only significant changes in these assumptions would result in an enterprise fair value that would be less than the carrying value of this reporting unit.
 
Income Taxes
 
Income taxes are estimated for each jurisdiction in which we operate. This involves assessing the current tax exposure together with temporary differences, which result from differing treatment of items for tax and book purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are provided for based on these assessments. Deferred tax assets are evaluated for recoverability based on estimated future taxable income. To the extent that recovery is deemed unlikely, a valuation allowance is recorded. During fiscal 2010, we increased our valuation allowance by $0.2 million. The increase was primarily the result of recording state credits and an associated valuation allowance against those credits offset by the reduction of the state net operating loss valuation allowance. Many years of data have been incorporated into the determination of tax reserves, and our estimates have historically proven to be reasonable.


40


 

Stock-Based Compensation
 
We have various stock-based compensation plans that we utilize as compensation for our Board of Directors, executive officers, senior management and other key employees. Our annual stock option and restricted stock award grants have averaged about 3.8 percent, 4.5 percent and 3.4 percent of outstanding shares for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. As of January 30, 2010, options to purchase 1.3 million common shares, representing 5.1 percent of total shares, were outstanding, of which 0.4 million were exercisable. All of the exercisable options had an exercise price below the closing end-of-year stock price of $35.02.
 
Beginning in fiscal 2010, employees below the Vice President level who participate in the LTI program receive, instead of restricted shares (and in some cases performance shares) that such employees formerly received, a cash-settled payment under the Stock Value Bonus Plan. Under the Stock Value Bonus Plan, the participant receives a payment of an amount equal to the fair market value of a common share on the date of vesting of the payout limited to 150% of the grant price of the company’s stock. The value will be locked in and will be paid in equal installments over a two or three-year vesting period if the grantee remains in the continuous service of the company throughout the vesting period.
 
We estimate the fair value of stock option awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model requires the input of assumptions, which we update regularly based on historical trends and current market observations. We do not pay dividends and no dividend rate assumption was used. We estimate expected volatility based on the historical volatility of the price of our common shares over the life of the awards. We believe the historical volatility is a reasonable expectation of future volatility. We also use historical experience to estimate the expected life of stock-based compensation awards and employee terminations. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yields of U.S. Treasury instruments with approximately the same term as the expected life of stock-based awards granted.
 
As of January 30, 2010, there was $1.5 million, $5.8 million and $1.3 million of compensation cost not yet recognized or earned related to stock options, non-vested restricted stock awards and cash-settled Stock Value Bonus Plan payout, respectively, which is expected to be recognized as earned over weighted-average periods of 1.6, 1.5 and 1.3 years, respectively.
 
See Notes 1 and 8 to our consolidated financial statements for more details of our stock-based compensation.
 
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
 
We define free cash flow as net income plus depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation expense and changes in working capital, less capital expenditures, net of landlord allowances. Free cash flow is considered a non-GAAP financial measure under the rules of the SEC. We believe that free cash flow is a relevant financial measure for use in evaluating our financial performance because it measures our ability to generate additional cash from our business operations.
 
Free cash flow should be considered in addition to, rather than as a substitute for, income from continuing operations as a measure of our performance or net cash provided by operating activities as a measure of our liquidity.


41


 

The following table reconciles net cash provided by operating activities, a GAAP measure, to free cash flow, a non-GAAP measure.
 
                         
    Fiscal Year Ended  
    2010     2009     2008  
    Dollars in millions  
 
Net cash provided by operating activities (GAAP measure)
  $ 184.0     $ 157.9     $ 73.6  
Less operating activities not included in our definition of free cash flow:
                       
Deferred income taxes
    0.3       (6.8 )     (0.7 )
Amortization of deferred financing costs
    (0.8 )     (0.8 )     (0.9 )
Loss on disposal and impairment of fixed assets
    (4.4 )     (2.9 )     (1.6 )
Gain on purchase of senior subordinated notes
    1.3       4.2        
Increase/(decrease) in lease obligations, net
    0.5       (9.1 )     3.6  
Increase/(decrease) in other long-term liabilities
    0.3       3.6       (12.8 )
Other, net
    (0.1 )     (3.4 )     0.8  
                         
Adjusted net cash provided by operating activities
    181.1       142.7       62.0  
Less:
                       
Total capital expenditures
    (39.7 )     (74.7 )     (37.7 )
Landlord reimbursed capital expenditures
    10.5       11.1       9.1  
                         
Capital expenditures, net of landlord allowances
    (29.2 )     (63.6 )     (28.6 )
                         
Free cash flow (a non-GAAP measure)
  $ 151.9     $ 79.1     $ 33.4  
                         
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance related to fair value measurements. The guidance is intended to provide additional direction regarding fair value measurements. Included in this new guidance are:
 
  •  a requirement that disclosures regarding fair value of financial instruments be disclosed on an interim as well as on an annual basis; and
 
  •  additional guidance regarding (1) estimating the fair value of an asset or liability when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly declined and (2) identifying transactions that are not orderly, as well as requiring disclosures in interim periods of the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value.
 
This new guidance was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted. The company adopted these pronouncements beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
 
Certain statements contained in this report that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of that term set forth in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements, which reflect our current views of future events and financial performance, involve certain risks and uncertainties. When used herein, the terms “anticipates,” “plans,” “estimates,” “expects,” “believes,” “intends,” and similar expressions as they relate to us or future events or conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,” “would,” “may,” and “could” are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. All statements that address operating performance, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future are forward-looking statements. Our actual results, performance or achievements may differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Risks and uncertainties that could cause or contribute to such material differences include, but are not limited to, the items described in


42


 

“Item 1A. Risk Factors” as well as changes in general economic conditions, risks in implementing new marketing initiatives, natural disasters and geo-political events, changes in customer demand, changes in trends in the fabric and craft industry, changes in the competitive pricing for products, the impact of competitors’ store openings and closings, our dependence on suppliers, seasonality, disruptions to the transportation system or increases in transportation costs, energy costs, our ability to recruit and retain highly qualified personnel, our ability to manage our inventory, our ability to effectively manage our distribution network, disruptions to our information systems, failure to maintain the security of our electronic and other confidential information, failure to comply with various laws and regulations, failure to successfully implement the store growth strategy, changes in accounting standards and effective tax rates, inadequacy of our insurance coverage, cash and cash equivalents held at financial institutions in excess of federally insured limits, volatility of our stock price, damage to our reputation, and other factors. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to update any of the forward-looking statements.
 
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
We are indirectly exposed to foreign currency fluctuations on merchandise that is sourced internationally and the impact of interest rate changes on our outstanding borrowings under our Amended Credit Facility.
 
We believe foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations do not contain significant market risk due to the nature of our relationships with our international vendors. All merchandise contracts are denominated in U.S. dollars and are subject to negotiation prior to our commitment for purchases. As a result, there is not a direct correlation between merchandise prices and fluctuations in the exchange rate. We sourced approximately 23 percent of our purchases internationally in fiscal 2010. Our international purchases are concentrated in China and other Asian countries.
 
In the normal course of business we employ established policies and procedures to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates. Our objective in managing the exposure to interest rate changes is to limit the volatility and impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows. This is accomplished through the debt structure we originally set in place in fiscal 2005, which consists of the fixed rate $100 million senior subordinated notes of which $47.5 million were outstanding at fiscal 2010 year-end but all of which were redeemed subsequent to year-end, and our Amended Credit Facility, which is designed to be a working capital facility. We estimate that a one percent increase or decrease in interest rates, based on fiscal 2010 average debt levels, would not cause an increase or decrease to interest expense.


43


 


 

 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.:
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. (the company) as of January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, and shareholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended January 30, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. at January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 30, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
 
Effective February 4, 2007, the company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (codified in FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes).
 
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 30, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated April 15, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
 
/s/  Ernst & Young LLP
 
Cleveland, Ohio
April 15, 2010


45


 

Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
 
                 
    January 30,
    January 31,
 
    2010     2009  
    (Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)  
 
Assets
               
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 217.1     $ 80.6  
Inventories
    416.8       429.4  
Deferred income taxes
    22.3       22.1  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    29.9       31.7  
                 
Total current assets
    686.1       563.8  
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net
    293.7       314.8  
Goodwill, net
    11.6       11.6  
Other assets
    9.0       9.5  
                 
Total assets
  $ 1,000.4     $ 899.7  
                 
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
               
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 151.1     $ 145.1  
Accrued expenses
    128.6       102.9  
Senior subordinated notes — short term (Note 6)
    47.5        
                 
Total current liabilities
    327.2       248.0  
Long-term debt
          66.0  
Long-term deferred income taxes
    2.2       1.8  
Lease obligations and other long-term liabilities
    105.4       106.2  
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
               
Shareholders’ equity:
               
Preferred stock, no par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
           
Common stock, stated value $0.05 per share; 150,000,000 authorized, issued 29,989,966 and 28,872,085, respectively
    1.5       1.4  
Additional paid-in capital
    234.7       211.7  
Retained earnings
    377.0       310.4  
                 
      613.2       523.5  
Treasury stock, at cost, 3,773,890 shares and 3,667,677 shares, respectively
    (47.6 )     (45.8 )
                 
Total shareholders’ equity
    565.6       477.7  
                 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 1,000.4     $ 899.7  
                 
 
See notes to consolidated financial statements


46


 

Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
 
                         
    Fiscal Year-Ended  
    January 30,
    January 31,
    February 2,
 
    2010     2009     2008  
    (Dollars in millions,
 
    except earnings per share data)  
 
Net sales
  $ 1,990.7     $ 1,901.1     $ 1,878.8  
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)
    1,015.0       1,018.6       1,006.4  
                         
Gross margin
    975.7       882.5       872.4  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    793.6       775.3       774.8  
Store pre-opening and closing costs
    11.7       12.3       8.4  
Depreciation and amortization
    56.3       54.2       51.8  
                         
Operating profit
    114.1       40.7       37.4  
Gain on purchase of senior subordinated notes
    (1.3 )     (4.2 )      
Interest expense, net
    6.3       9.4       12.5  
                         
Income before income taxes
    109.1       35.5       24.9  
Income tax provision
    42.5       13.6       9.5  
                         
Net income
  $ 66.6     $ 21.9     $ 15.4  
                         
Net income per common share — basic
  $ 2.60     $ 0.88     $ 0.63  
                         
Net income per common share — diluted
  $ 2.51     $ 0.86     $ 0.62  
                         
 
See notes to consolidated financial statements


47


 

Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
 
                         
    Fiscal Year-Ended  
    January 30,
    January 31,
    February 2,
 
    2010     2009     2008  
    (Dollars in millions)  
 
Net cash flows from operating activities:
                       
Net income
  $ 66.6     $ 21.9     $ 15.4  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
                       
Depreciation and amortization
    56.3       54.2       51.8  
Deferred income taxes
    (0.3 )     6.8       0.7  
Stock-based compensation expense
    9.0       9.4       8.3  
Amortization of deferred financing costs
    0.8       0.8       0.9  
Loss on disposal and impairment of fixed assets
    4.4       2.9       1.6  
Gain on purchase of senior subordinated notes
    (1.3 )     (4.2 )      
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                       
Decrease (increase) in inventories
    12.6       42.8       (18.8 )
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other current assets
    1.8       (7.9 )     6.6  
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable
    6.0       15.7       (4.2 )
Increase in accrued expenses
    28.8       6.6       2.9  
(Decrease) increase in lease obligations, net
    (0.5 )     9.1       (3.6 )
(Decrease) increase in other long-term liabilities
    (0.3 )     (3.6 )     12.8  
Other, net
    0.1       3.4       (0.8 )
                         
Net cash provided by operating activities
    184.0       157.9       73.6  
Net cash used for investing activities:
                       
Capital expenditures
    (39.7 )     (74.7 )     (37.7 )
Payment for acquisition, net of cash acquired
    (3.1 )     (3.1 )     (11.7 )
                         
Net cash used for investing activities
    (42.8 )     (77.8 )     (49.4 )
Net cash flows used for financing activities:
                       
Purchase of senior subordinated notes
    (17.0 )     (29.5 )      
Net change in revolving credit facility
                (25.3 )
Proceeds from stock-based compensation plans
    13.5       6.0       7.8  
Other, net
    (1.2 )     (1.4 )     0.3  
                         
Net cash used for financing activities
    (4.7 )     (24.9 )     (17.2 )
                         
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
    136.5       55.2       7.0  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
    80.6       25.4       18.4  
                         
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
  $ 217.1     $ 80.6     $ 25.4  
                         
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
                       
Cash paid during the year for:
                       
Interest
  $ 5.9     $ 9.4     $ 11.6  
Income taxes, net of refunds
    30.7       2.3       (7.2 )
 
See notes to consolidated financial statements


48


 

Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
 
                                                           
                  Common
                         
    Net
            Stock
    Additional
                Total
 
    Common
    Treasury
      Stated
    Paid-In
    Treasury
    Retained
    Shareholders’
 
    Shares     Shares       Value     Capital     Stock     Earnings     Equity  
    (Shares in thousands)                   (Dollars in millions)        
Balance, February 3, 2007
    23,857       3,543       $ 1.4     $ 176.9     $ (43.2 )   $ 274.7     $ 409.8  
Change in accounting principle for uncertainty in income taxes
                                    (1.6 )     (1.6 )
                                                           
Adjusted balance, February 3, 2007
    23,857       3,543         1.4       176.9       (43.2 )     273.1       408.2  
Net income
                                    15.4       15.4  
                                                           
Total comprehensive income
                                                      15.4  
Exercise of stock options
    350       (16 )             5.6       0.1             5.7  
Tax benefit on equity compensation
                        1.7                   1.7  
Stock-based compensation
    203                     8.3                   8.3  
Purchase of common stock
    (60 )     60                     (1.4 )           (1.4 )
Issuance of common stock — Associate Stock Ownership Plan
    135                     2.1                   2.1  
                                                           
Balance, February 2, 2008
    24,485       3,587         1.4       194.6       (44.5 )     288.5       440.0  
Net income
                                    21.9       21.9  
                                                           
Total comprehensive income
                                                      21.9  
Exercise of stock options
    406                     4.1                   4.1  
Tax benefit on equity compensation
                        1.7                   1.7  
Stock-based compensation
    248                     9.4                   9.4  
Purchase of common stock
    (81 )     81                     (1.3 )           (1.3 )
Issuance of common stock — Associate Stock Ownership Plan
    146                     1.9                   1.9  
                                                           
Balance, January 31, 2009
    25,204       3,668         1.4       211.7       (45.8 )     310.4       477.7  
Net income
                                    66.6       66.6  
                                                           
Total comprehensive income
                                                      66.6  
Exercise of stock options
    635                     11.8                   11.8  
Tax benefit on equity compensation
                        0.6                   0.6  
Stock-based compensation
    360               0.1       8.9                   9.0  
Purchase of common stock
    (106 )     106                     (1.8 )           (1.8 )
Issuance of common stock — Associate Stock Ownership Plan
    123                     1.7                   1.7  
                                                           
Balance, January 30, 2010
    26,216       3,774       $ 1.5     $ 234.7     $ (47.6 )   $ 377.0     $ 565.6  
                                                           
 
See notes to consolidated financial statements


49


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies
 
Nature of Operations
 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. (the “company”), an Ohio corporation, is a fabric and craft retailer with 746 retail stores in 48 states at January 30, 2010. The 518 small-format, 228 large-format stores and our website feature a variety of competitively priced merchandise used in sewing, crafting and home decorating projects, including fabrics, notions, crafts, frames, paper crafting material, artificial floral, home accents, finished seasonal and home décor merchandise.
 
The company manages its business in operating segments that are reportable segments: large-format stores, small-format stores and other. See Note 12 — Segment Reporting for further detail.
 
The significant accounting policies applied in preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements of the company are summarized below.
 
Basis of Presentation
 
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain amounts in the fiscal 2009 and 2008 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Since actual results may differ from those estimates, the company revises its estimates and assumptions, as new information becomes available.
 
Fiscal Year
 
The company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31. Fiscal years consist of 52 weeks, unless noted otherwise. The fiscal year refers to the year in which the period ends (e.g., fiscal 2010 refers to the year-ended January 30, 2010).
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
Cash and cash equivalents include amounts on deposit with financial institutions and investments held in money market accounts, with maturities of less than 90 days. The amount of cash equivalents held in money market accounts at January 30, 2010 was $89.5 million and the related weighted-average interest rate was 0.25 percent. We did not have any cash equivalents held in money market accounts at January 31, 2009.
 
Inventories
 
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined on a weighted average basis. Inventory valuation methods require certain management estimates and judgments, which affect the ending inventory valuation at cost, as well as the gross margin reported for the year. These valuation methods include estimates of net realizable value on product designated for clearance and estimates of shrink between periods when the company conducts distribution center inventory cycle counts and store physical inventories to substantiate inventory balances.
 
The company’s accrual for shrink is based on the actual historical shrink results of recent distribution center inventory cycle counts and store physical inventories. These estimates are compared to actual results as


50


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
 
physical inventory counts are taken and reconciled to the general ledger. Substantially all of the company’s entire store physical inventory counts are taken in the first three quarters of each year and the shrink accrual recorded at January 30, 2010 is based on shrink results of these prior physical inventories. All store locations that have been open one year or longer are physically inventoried once a year. The company continually monitors and adjusts the shrink rate estimates based on the results of store physical inventories and shrink trends.
 
Inventory reserves for clearance product are estimated based on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, quantities of slow moving or carryover seasonal merchandise on hand, historical recovery statistics and future merchandising plans. The accuracy of the company’s estimates can be affected by many factors, some of which are outside of the company’s control, including changes in economic conditions and consumer buying trends.
 
Consignment inventory is not reflected in the company’s consolidated financial statements. Consignment inventory consists of patterns, magazines, books, DVDs and greeting cards. Consignment inventory can be returned to the vendor at any time. At the time consigned inventory is sold, the company records the purchase liability in accounts payable and the related cost of merchandise in cost of sales. The company had approximately $33.0 million of consignment inventory on hand at January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively.
 
Property, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements
 
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are recorded over the estimated useful life of the assets principally by the straight-line method. The major classes of assets and ranges of estimated useful lives are: buildings from ten to 40 years; furniture, fixtures and equipment from two to ten years; and leasehold improvements for the lesser of ten years or over the remaining life of the lease. Maintenance and repair expenditures are charged to expense as incurred and improvements and major renewals are capitalized.
 
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements consist of the following:
 
                 
    Fiscal Year  
    2010     2009  
    (Dollars in millions)  
 
Land and buildings
  $ 71.1     $ 70.3  
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
    523.7       503.6  
Leasehold improvements
    169.8       158.3  
Construction in progress
    11.3       22.5  
                 
      775.9       754.7  
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
    (482.2 )     (439.9 )
                 
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net
  $ 293.7     $ 314.8  
                 
 
Software Development
 
The company capitalized $2.1 million and $9.9 million in fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively, for internal use software acquired from third parties. The capitalized amounts are included in property, equipment and leasehold improvements. The company amortizes internal use software on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from three to five years beginning at the time the software becomes operational. Amortization expense was $4.6 million, $3.6 million and $2.1 million in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.


51


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
 
Goodwill
 
Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of the net assets of acquired entities. The company assesses the carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets annually or whenever circumstances indicate that a decline in value may have occurred, utilizing a fair value approach at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is the operating segment, or a business unit one level below that operating segment, for which discrete financial information is prepared and regularly reviewed by segment management.
 
The goodwill impairment test is a two-step impairment test. In the first step, the company compares the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. The company determines the fair value of its reporting units using valuation techniques including discounted cash flows. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets assigned to that reporting unit, goodwill is not considered impaired. If the carrying value of the net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, then the company must perform the second step in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill and compare it to the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. The activities in the second step include valuing the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities of the impaired reporting unit based on their fair value and determining the fair value of the impaired reporting unit’s goodwill based upon the residual of the summed identified tangible and intangible assets and liabilities.
 
The goodwill carried on the company’s balance sheet at January 30, 2010 represented the excess of purchase price and related costs over the fair value assigned to the net assets of IdeaForest.com, Inc. (“IdeaForest”), which was renamed Joann.com, Inc. upon acquisition and subsequently converted to a limited liability company named joann.com, LLC. The company tests goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter, and more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may exist. The company performed its annual impairment testing as of November 3, 2009 and determined that no impairment charge was necessary.
 
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
 
The company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of those assets may not be recoverable. Factors considered important that could trigger an impairment review include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results and significant changes in the manner of use of the assets or the company’s overall business strategies. Potential impairment exists if the estimated undiscounted cash flow expected to result from the use of the assets is less than the carrying value of the asset. The amount of the impairment loss represents the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its fair value. Management estimates fair value based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate that is considered to be commensurate with the risk inherent in the company’s current business model. Additional factors are taken into consideration, such as local market conditions, operating environment and other trends.
 
Based on management’s ongoing review of the performance of its stores and other facilities, the following impairment losses were recorded and are reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) on the consolidated statement of operations.
 


52


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
 
                         
    Fiscal Year-Ended  
    2010     2009     2008  
    (Dollars in millions)  
 
Segment
                       
Large-format stores
  $ 2.3     $ 1.9     $ 0.4  
Small-format stores
    0.1       0.1       0.2  
                         
Total
  $ 2.4     $ 2.0     $ 0.6  
                         
 
Store Pre-Opening and Closing Costs
 
Store pre-opening costs are expensed as incurred and relate to the costs incurred prior to a new store opening, which includes the hiring and training costs for new employees, processing costs of initial merchandise and rental expense for the period prior to the store opening for business. See Note 4 — Store Closings for further detail.
 
The company recognizes costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. In addition, any liabilities that arise from exit or disposal activities are initially measured and recorded at fair value. See Note 4 — Store Closings.
 
                         
    Fiscal Year-Ended  
    2010     2009     2008  
    (Dollars in millions)  
 
Store pre-opening costs
  $ 5.5     $ 7.8     $ 3.1  
Store closing costs
    6.2       4.5       5.3  
                         
    $ 11.7     $ 12.3     $ 8.4  
                         
 
Accrued Expenses
 
The company estimates certain material expenses in an effort to record those expenses in the period incurred. The company’s most material estimates relate to compensation, taxes and insurance-related expenses, significant portions of which are self-insured. The ultimate cost of the company’s workers’ compensation and general liability insurance accruals are recorded based on actuarial valuations and historical claims experience. The company’s employee medical insurance accruals are recorded based on its medical claims processed as well as historical medical claims experience for claims incurred but not yet reported. The company maintains stop-loss coverage to limit the exposure to certain insurance-related risks. Differences in estimates and assumptions could result in an accrual requirement materially different from the calculated accrual. Historically, such differences have not been significant.

53


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
 
The current portion of accrued expenses consists of the following:
 
                 
    Fiscal Year  
    2010     2009  
    (Dollars in millions)  
 
Accrued taxes
  $ 28.0     $ 18.2  
Accrued compensation
    35.8       21.3  
Workers’ compensation and general liability insurance
    9.3       10.4  
Capital expenditures payable
    6.4       10.2  
Occupancy and rent-related liabilities
    16.7       16.6  
Customer gift cards
    13.2       12.2  
Other
    19.2       14.0  
                 
Total accrued expenses
  $ 128.6     $ 102.9  
                 
 
Lease obligations and other long-term liabilities
 
Lease obligations and other long-term liabilities consist of the following:
 
                 
    Fiscal Year  
    2010     2009  
    (Dollars in millions)  
 
Workers’ compensation and general liability insurance
  $ 15.2     $ 14.7  
Occupancy and rent-related liabilities
    75.7       76.2  
Other
    14.5       15.3  
                 
Total lease obligations and other long-term liabilities
  $ 105.4     $ 106.2  
                 
 
The long-term portion of certain workers’ compensation and general liability accruals are discounted to their net present value based on expected loss payment patterns determined by independent actuaries using actual historical payments. Total discounted insurance liabilities for fiscal years ended 2010 and 2009 were $24.5 million, reflecting a 1.4 percent discount rate, and $25.1 million, reflecting a 1.5 percent discount rate, respectively. The following table represents a five year schedule for estimated future insurance liabilities:
 
         
Fiscal Year-Ended
  Liability  
    (Dollars in millions)  
 
2011
  $ 9.3  
2012
    4.9  
2013
    3.6  
2014
    2.3  
2015
    1.8  
Thereafter
    2.6  
         
Total workers’ compensation and general liability insurance
  $ 24.5  
         
 
Financial Instruments
 
A financial instrument is cash or a contract that imposes an obligation to deliver, or conveys a right to receive cash or another financial instrument. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents and accounts payable are considered to be representative of fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments. The


54


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
 
price of the 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes (the “Notes”) at January 30, 2010 in the high yield debt market was approximately at par value. Accordingly, the fair value of the Notes approximated their carrying value of approximately $47.5 million.
 
In the normal course of business, the company employs established policies and procedures to manage exposure to changes in interest rates. The company’s objective in managing the exposure to interest rate changes is to limit the volatility and impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows. This is accomplished through the debt structure set in place in fiscal 2005, which consisted of the fixed rate Notes and the variable rate senior bank credit facility (the “Credit Facility,” and as amended in September 2008, the “Amended Credit Facility”), which is designed to be a working capital facility.
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
In February 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released new guidance which delayed the effective date to value all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) until the first quarter of fiscal 2009. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.
 
Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset and liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, a fair value hierarchy has been established that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
 
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
 
Level 2 — Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and
 
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
 
The company’s cash and cash equivalents represent the financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of January 30, 2010. As required, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels. The fair value of the company’s cash and cash equivalents was $217.1 million at January 30, 2010. These fair values were determined using Level 1 measurements in the fair value hierarchy.
 
The carrying value of the company’s debt approximates its fair value.
 
Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (e.g., when there is evidence of impairment). The company recorded an impairment charge of $2.4 million in fiscal 2010 to reduce certain store assets to their estimated fair value. The fair values were determined based on the income approach, in which the company utilized internal cash flow projections


55


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
 
over the life of the underlying lease agreements discounted based on a risk-free rate of return. These measures of fair value, and related inputs, are considered a level 3 approach under the fair value hierarchy.
 
Income Taxes
 
The company does business in various jurisdictions that impose income taxes. The aggregate amount of income tax expense to accrue and the amount currently payable are based upon the tax statutes of each jurisdiction, pursuant to the asset and liability method. This process involves adjusting book income for items that are treated differently by the applicable taxing authorities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected on the balance sheet for temporary differences that will reverse in subsequent years. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are estimated to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in the tax rate is recognized in income or expense in the period that the change is effective. The current tax provision can be affected by the mix of income and identification or resolution of uncertain tax positions. Because income from different jurisdictions may be taxed at different rates, the shift in mix during a year or over years can cause the effective tax rate to change. The rate is based on the best estimate of an annual effective rate, and those estimates are updated quarterly. The company also regularly evaluates the status and likely outcome of uncertain tax positions.
 
As a matter of course, the company is regularly audited by federal, state and local tax authorities. Reserves are provided for potential exposures when it is considered more-likely-than-not that a taxing authority may take a sustainable position on a matter contrary to the company’s position. The company evaluates these reserves, including interest thereon, on a quarterly basis to ensure that they have been appropriately adjusted for events, including audit settlements that may impact the ultimate payment for such exposure.
 
Revenue Recognition
 
Retail sales, net of estimated returns, and excluding sales taxes, are recorded at the point of sale when payment is made and customers take possession of the merchandise in stores, at the point of shipment of merchandise ordered through the Internet or, in the case of custom orders, when the product is delivered to the customer and any remaining balance due from the customer is collected. Deposits received for custom orders are deferred as a liability until the related product is delivered to the customer. Shipping and handling fees charged to customers are also recorded as retail sales with related costs recorded as cost of goods sold. Sales taxes are not included in retail sales as the company acts as a conduit for collecting and remitting sales taxes to the appropriate governmental authorities.
 
The company allows for merchandise to be returned under most circumstances. The current policy allows for customers to receive an even exchange or full refund based upon the original method of payment when the returned purchase is accompanied with a receipt and the return is within 90 days of purchase. The reserve for returns was $1.1 million at January 30, 2010 and $0.5 million at January 31, 2009, respectively. Returns historically have not had a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
 
Proceeds from the sale of gift cards are recorded as a liability and recognized as net sales when redeemed by the holder. Gift card breakage represents the remaining balance of our liability for gift cards for which the likelihood of redemption by the customer is remote. Gift card breakage is recognized under the redemption method and is determined based on the historical redemption patterns of gift cards sold since fiscal 2002. In fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, we recognized $0.9 million, $0.7 million and $1.1 million of pre-tax income due to gift card breakage, respectively. The company is not required by law to escheat the value of unredeemed gift cards to the states in which it operates.


56


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
 
Cost of Sales
 
Inbound freight and duties related to import purchases and internal transfer costs are considered to be direct costs of the company’s merchandise and, accordingly, are recognized when the related merchandise is sold as cost of sales. Purchasing and receiving costs, warehousing costs and other costs of the company’s distribution network are considered to be period costs not directly attributable to the value of merchandise and, accordingly, are expensed as incurred as SG&A. Distribution network costs of $49.0 million, $54.3 million and $59.5 million were included in SG&A expenses for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
The company receives vendor support including cash discounts, volume discounts, allowances and co-operative advertising. The company has agreements in place with each vendor setting forth the specific conditions for each allowance or payment. Depending on the arrangement, the company either recognizes the allowance as a reduction of current costs or defers the payment over the period the related merchandise is sold through cost of sales. Historically, vendor consideration has not had a significant impact on cost of sales or gross margin. Payments that are a reimbursement of specific, incremental and identifiable costs incurred to promote vendors’ products are recorded as an offset against advertising expense.
 
Operating Leases
 
Rent expense for operating leases, which may have escalating rentals over the term of the lease, is recorded on a straight-line basis over the initial lease term and those renewal periods that are reasonably assured. The initial lease term for the company’s stores includes the “build-out” period of leases, when no rent payments are typically due under the terms of the lease. The difference between rent expense and rent paid is recorded as a deferred rent liability and is included in the consolidated balance sheets.
 
Construction allowances and other incentives received from landlords are recorded as a deferred rent liability and amortized to rent expense over the initial term of the lease. The company’s statement of cash flows reflects the receipt of incentives as an increase in cash flows from operating activities.
 
Advertising Costs
 
The company expenses production costs of advertising the first time the advertising takes place. Advertising expense, net of co-operative advertising agreements, was $67.5 million, $66.9 million and $67.8 million for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Included in prepaid and other current assets are $1.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively, at the end of fiscal 2010 and 2009 relating to prepayments of production costs for advertising.
 
Earnings Per Share
 
Basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares of common shares plus the effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Dilutive potential common shares include the effect of the


57


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
 
assumed exercise of outstanding stock options and unvested restricted stock awards. Basic and diluted earnings per common share are as follows:
 
                         
    Fiscal Year-Ended  
    2010     2009     2008  
    (Dollars in millions, except per share data)  
 
Net income
  $ 66.6     $ 21.9     $ 15.4  
                         
Weighted average shares outstanding (shares in thousands):
                       
Basic
    25,655       24,886       24,296  
Incremental shares from assumed exercise of stock options
    318       200       324  
Incremental restricted shares
    562       397       330  
                         
Diluted
    26,535       25,483       24,950  
Net income per common share — basic
  $ 2.60     $ 0.88     $ 0.63  
                         
Net income per common share — diluted
  $ 2.51     $ 0.86     $ 0.62  
                         
 
For fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 the above calculations of the diluted net income per common share reflects the impact of stock options that had exercise prices below the average market price of the company’s common shares for the year. An average of 576,423 stock options for fiscal 2010, 820,339 stock options for fiscal 2009 and 707,303 stock options for fiscal 2008 were not included in the computation of diluted net income per common share because the exercise price of the stock options exceeded the average market price and would have been anti-dilutive.
 
Stock-Based Compensation
 
Costs associated with stock-based compensation are measured using the fair value method of accounting. The company estimates expected forfeitures as of the date the awards are granted and records compensation expense only for those awards that are ultimately expected to vest. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period of the awards.
 
Cash flows resulting from the tax benefits of deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for stock-based awards are classified as financing cash flows.
 
The following table shows the expense recognized by the company for stock-based compensation.
 
                         
    Fiscal Year-Ended  
    2010     2009     2008  
    (Dollars in millions)  
 
Stock option compensation expense(a)
  $ 2.5     $ 4.3     $ 2.9  
Restricted stock award amortization
    6.5       5.1       5.4  
Cash-settled Stock Value Bonus Plan
    1.9              
                         
    $ 10.9     $ 9.4     $ 8.3  
                         
 
 
(a) Included within stock option compensation expense is expense related to the employee stock purchase plan (the Associate Stock Ownership Plan or “ASOP”). The associated expense is not significant.
 
The company estimates the fair value of options granted using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model requires several assumptions, which management updates regularly based on historical trends and current market observations. The fair values of the options granted under the stock plans are determined at


58


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
 
the date of grant. The company does not pay dividends, thus, no dividend rate assumption is used. The company estimates expected volatility based on the historical volatility of the price of the common shares over the expected life of the awards. The company believes its historical volatility is a reasonable expectation of future volatility. The company also uses historical experience to estimate the expected life of stock-based compensation awards and employee terminations. The risk-free interest rate is based on applicable U.S. Treasury yields that approximate the expected life of stock-based awards granted.
 
The significant assumptions used to calculate the fair value of option grants were as follows:
 
             
    Fiscal Year-Ended
    2010   2009   2008
 
Weighted average fair value of options granted
  $5.27   $4.87   $7.99
Expected volatility of underlying stock
  .550 to .605   .437 to .459   .388 to .417
Risk-free interest rates
  1.4% to 1.6%   2.1% to 3.2%   3.3% to 4.9%
Expected life
  2.2 to 5.2 years   2.2 to 5.2 years   2.2 to 5.2 years
Expected life — Associate Stock Ownership Plan
  6 months   6 months   6 months
 
See Note 8 — Stock-Based Compensation for further detail.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In February 2008, the FASB issued an accounting standard update which delayed the effective date of fair value measurements accounting for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually). The company adopted the standard for its non-financial assets (goodwill, property and equipment) during the first quarter ended May 2, 2009.
 
The company’s non-financial assets are not required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. However, if certain triggering events occur, or if an annual impairment test is required, it may be necessary for the company to evaluate the fair value of its non-financial assets and record them at the lower of cost or fair value. The company recorded an impairment charge of $2.4 million in fiscal 2010 to reduce certain store assets to their estimated fair value. The fair values were determined based on the income approach, in which the company utilized internal cash flow projections over the life of the underlying lease agreements discounted based on a risk-free rate of return. These measures of fair value, and related inputs, are considered a level 3 approach under the fair value hierarchy.
 
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance related to fair value measurements. The guidance is intended to provide additional direction regarding fair value measurements. Included in this new guidance are:
 
  •  a requirement that disclosures regarding fair value of financial instruments be disclosed on an interim as well as on an annual basis;
 
  •  additional guidance regarding (1) estimating the fair value of an asset or liability when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly declined and (2) identifying transactions that are not orderly, as well as requiring disclosures in interim periods of the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value.
 
This new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted. The company adopted these pronouncements beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2010.


59


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
 
The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
In May 2009, the FASB issued new guidance that defines subsequent events as events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date, but before the financial statements are issued. It defines two types of subsequent events: recognized subsequent events, which provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date; and non-recognized subsequent events, which provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the balance sheet date, but arose before the financial statements were issued. Recognized subsequent events are required to be recognized in the financial statements, and non-recognized subsequent events are required to be disclosed. The statement requires entities to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated, and the basis for that date. However, on February 24, 2010, the FASB amended its guidance on subsequent events. As a result, SEC registrants will not disclose the date through which management evaluated subsequent events in the financial statements — either in originally issued financial statements or reissued financial statements. This FASB guidance is consistent with current practice and did not have any impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance that makes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) the single source of authoritative U.S. accounting and reporting standards, but it does not change U.S. GAAP. The statement is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company adopted this statement as of October 31, 2009. The statement had no impact on the company’s financial position or results of operations.
 
Note 2 — Goodwill
 
Total goodwill carried on the company’s balance sheet for fiscal years 2010 and 2009 represented the excess of purchase price and related costs over the fair value assigned to the net assets of IdeaForest, which was renamed Joann.com, Inc. upon acquisition and subsequently converted to a limited liability company named joann.com, LLC. joann.com, LLC is included as part of the company’s Other segment.
 
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we conducted the annual impairment testing on our goodwill acquired in the Joann.com acquisition. We consider the Joann.com entity to be a stand alone operating segment and reporting unit as discrete financial information is available at this level. As such, we tested our goodwill for impairment at this level. The impairment evaluation process is an income-based approach that utilizes discounted cash flows for the determination of the enterprise fair value of Joann.com. Our material assumptions used in our impairment analysis included the weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) percent, terminal growth rate and forecasted long-term sales growth. As a result of our impairment analysis, we determined that our goodwill was not impaired for fiscal 2010. We used 14.5 percent for WACC for fiscal 2010. A one percent change in the WACC rate represents an approximate $1.5 million change to the enterprise fair value of Joann.com. A one percent change in the terminal growth rate and long-term growth rate represents an approximate combined $1.0 million change to the enterprise fair value. Neither assumption change would have resulted in an impairment for goodwill. Only significant changes in these assumptions would result in an enterprise fair value that would be less than the carrying value of this reporting unit.
 
Note 3 — Acquisition
 
On November 5, 2007, the company completed the acquisition of the 62 percent portion of IdeaForest that the company previously did not own. IdeaForest was the operator of the Joann.com website. IdeaForest, which was renamed Joann.com, Inc. and subsequently converted to a limited liability company named joann.com, LLC. joann.com, LLC is now a wholly- owned subsidiary of the company and is included as part of the Other segment.


60


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 3 — Acquisition (Continued)
 
Per the merger agreement, the purchase price was $23.6 million and was comprised of a gross cash payment of $14.6 million ($11.7 million, net of cash acquired) which was due upon closing, severance payments of $0.3 million payable subsequent to closing and delayed payments of $8.6 million, subject to adjustment, as described in the agreement, over the three years following the closing. The delayed payments, before adjustment, are non-interest bearing and are payable in three installments as follows: $3.1 million in November 2008, $3.1 million in November 2009 and $2.4 million in November 2010. Payments of approximately $3.1 million were made in November 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
Note 4 — Store Closings
 
Store closing charges included within the consolidated statement of operations for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008 are summarized below, and represent charges incurred to close stores related to the large-format store growth strategy and store performance. These charges are included in the line item “Store pre-opening and closing costs” in the statements of operations included in the consolidated financial statements.
 
                         
    Fiscal Year-Ended  
    2010     2009     2008  
    (Dollars in millions)  
 
Store Closing Charges:
                       
Non-cancelable lease obligations
  $ 1.5     $ 0.2     $ 1.3  
Asset-related charges
    1.5       0.7       0.9  
Other store closing costs
    3.2       3.6       3.1  
                         
Total
  $ 6.2     $ 4.5     $ 5.3  
                         
 
The store closing reserve was $0.7 million and $0.6 million as of January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively. The reserve is comprised of miscellaneous liquidation costs, which are incurred but not paid.
 
Asset-related charges include write-downs of fixed assets to their estimated fair value for stores closed, or scheduled to be closed. The asset-related charges represent the difference between the asset carrying value and the future net discounted cash flows estimated by the company to be generated by those assets.
 
Other costs represent miscellaneous store closing costs, including, among other things, third-party inventory liquidator costs and costs related to fixtures, signage and register removal.
 
Note 5 — Income Taxes
 
During fiscal 2010, the company made no material changes to tax related reserves. At the end of fiscal 2010, the company’s unrecognized tax benefits are $7.0 million, of which $4.5 million would affect the effective tax rate, if recognized.
 
The company records interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions as a component of the income tax provision. The total amount of interest and penalties accrued as of the end of fiscal 2009 was $3.4 million and as of the end of fiscal 2010 decreased to $3.0 million.
 
The company files income tax returns in the United States and various state and local jurisdictions. For U.S. federal, state and local purposes, the company is no longer subject to income tax examinations by taxing authorities for fiscal years prior to fiscal year 2005, with some exceptions for state and local purposes due to longer statutes of limitations or the extensions of statutes of limitations. The company believes that, due to various factors, including the settlement of ongoing audits and the expiration or extension of underlying statutes of limitation, it is impractical to determine whether the total of uncertain tax positions will significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months.


61


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 5 — Income Taxes (Continued)
 
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the past three fiscal years is as follows:
 
                         
    Fiscal Year  
    2010     2009     2008  
    (Dollars in millions)  
 
Balance at beginning of fiscal year
  $ 8.0     $ 7.8     $ 7.6  
Increases related to prior year tax positions
          0.2        
Decreases related to prior year tax positions
          (0.2 )      
Increases related to current year tax positions
    0.4       1.0       1.0  
Settlements
    (0.9 )            
Lapse of statute of limitations
    (0.5 )     (0.8 )     (0.8 )
                         
Balance at end of fiscal year
  $ 7.0     $ 8.0     $ 7.8  
                         
 
The significant components of the income tax provision are as follows:
 
                         
    Fiscal Year-Ended  
    2010     2009     2008  
    (Dollars in millions)  
 
Current:
                       
Federal
  $ 36.0     $ 5.6     $ 7.3  
State and local
    6.8       1.2       1.5  
                         
      42.8       6.8       8.8  
Deferred
    (0.3 )     6.8       0.7  
                         
Income tax provision
  $ 42.5     $ 13.6     $ 9.5  
                         
 
The reconciliation of income tax at the statutory rate to the income tax provision is as follows:
 
                         
    Fiscal Year-Ended  
    2010     2009     2008  
    (Dollars in millions)  
 
Federal income tax at the statutory rate
  $ 38.2     $ 12.4     $ 8.7  
Effect of:
                       
State and local taxes
    5.1       1.3       1.4  
Other, net
    (0.8 )     (0.1 )     (0.6 )
                         
Income tax provision
  $ 42.5     $ 13.6     $ 9.5  
                         


62


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 5 — Income Taxes (Continued)
 
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The significant components of the company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
 
                 
    Fiscal Year
 
    Asset/(Liability)  
    2010     2009  
    (Dollars in millions)  
 
Current
               
Deferred tax assets:
               
Inventory items
  $ 8.6     $ 10.1  
Lease obligations
    0.5       0.6  
Employee benefits
    7.9       7.8  
Valuation allowances
    (1.6 )     (1.4 )
Other
    6.9       5.0  
                 
Net current deferred tax asset
  $ 22.3     $ 22.1  
                 
Non-current
               
Deferred tax assets:
               
Lease obligations
  $ 33.7     $ 33.6  
Employee benefits
    8.0       8.3  
Federal net operating loss carryforwards
    9.5       10.5  
State net operating loss carryforwards
    1.9       2.9  
State credits
    4.4       3.9  
Other
    3.6       5.0  
Valuation allowances
    (2.5 )     (2.5 )
                 
      58.6       61.7  
Deferred tax liabilities:
               
Depreciation
    (60.2 )     (62.9 )
Other
    (0.6 )     (0.6 )
                 
      (60.8 )     (63.5 )
                 
Net non-current deferred tax liability
  $ (2.2 )   $ (1.8 )
                 
Total Deferred Taxes
  $ 20.1     $ 20.3  
                 
 
The company has approximately $27.2 million of gross federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards, with a net valuation allowance of $0.9 million, and $21.4 million of gross state NOL carryforwards, with a net valuation allowance of $0.2 million, which expire in fiscal year 2020 through fiscal year 2027 and fiscal year 2011 through fiscal year 2029, respectively. The company has net state tax credits of $4.4 million, with a valuation allowance of $3.0 million. The company increased its valuation allowances in fiscal 2010 to $4.1 million from $3.9 million in fiscal 2009. The increase was primarily the result of recording state credits and an associated valuation allowance against those credits offset by the reduction of the state NOL valuation allowance.


63


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
 
Note 6 — Financing
 
Short-term and long-term debt consists of the company’s 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes, the balance of which was $47.5 million and $66.0 million at the end of fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, the company had no borrowings under the Amended Credit Facility.
 
Secured Credit Facility
 
On September 5, 2008, the company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into the Amended Credit Facility by amending certain terms and extending the maturity of its Credit Facility, originally entered into as of April 24, 2001. The Amended Credit Facility, which expires on September 5, 2013, is a $300 million revolver with Bank of America, N.A. and seven other lenders and is secured by a first priority security interest in the company’s inventory, accounts receivable, personal property and other assets and is guaranteed by certain wholly-owned subsidiary of the company. The company has the option to request an increase in the size of the Amended Credit Facility up to $100 million (for a total facility of $400 million) in increments of $25 million, provided that no default exists or would arise from the increase. However, the lenders under the Amended Credit Facility are not under any obligation to provide any such additional increments. Interest on borrowings under the Amended Credit Facility is calculated at either LIBOR plus 1.75 percent to 2.25 percent or the bank’s base rate plus 0.75 percent to 1.25 percent, both of which are dependent on the level of average excess availability during the previous fiscal month. The Amended Credit Facility contains a sub-limit for letters of credit of $200 million. Deferred financing costs of $2.3 million, of which $0.4 million relates to the unamortized portion of the deferred financing costs of the previous Credit Facility, are being amortized over the term of the Amended Credit Facility. As of January 30, 2010, the company had no borrowings outstanding under the Amended Credit Facility. As of January 30, 2010, the company had $18.4 million in standby letters of credit outstanding under the Amended Credit Facility.
 
The company did not borrow on the Amended Credit Facility during fiscal 2010. The company’s weighted average interest rate and weighted average borrowings under the Amended Credit Facility were 6.1 percent and $8.1 million during fiscal 2009.
 
The Amended Credit Facility contains customary covenants that, among other things, restrict the company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness or guarantee obligations, engage in mergers or consolidations, dispose of assets, make investments, acquisitions, loans or advances, engage in certain transactions with affiliates, create liens, or change the nature of its business. The company is restricted in its ability to prepay or modify the terms of other indebtedness, pay dividends and make other distributions when excess availability, which represents net borrowing capacity, falls below certain levels. Further, the company is required to comply with a minimum fixed charge ratio covenant, if excess availability is less than ten percent of the borrowing base at any time. As of January 30, 2010, excess availability was $242.5 million. The Amended Credit Facility also defines various events of default, including cross-default provisions, defaults for any material judgments or a change in control. At January 30, 2010, the company was in compliance with all covenants under the Amended Credit Facility.
 
In November 2007, the company amended the Credit Facility to allow for the acquisition of the remaining equity of IdeaForest.com, Inc., which was renamed Joann.com, Inc. upon acquisition and subsequently converted to a limited liability company named joann.com, LLC.
 
Senior Subordinated Notes
 
On February 26, 2004, the company issued $100 million 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes due on March 1, 2012. Interest on the notes was payable on March 1 and September 1 of each year. Deferred debt costs recorded at issuance of $2.6 million are reflected in other long-term assets and are being amortized as interest expense over the term of the notes utilizing the effective interest method. Beginning March 1, 2008,


64


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 6 — Financing (Continued)
 
the company had the option of redeeming the notes at any time, in accordance with certain call provisions of the related note indenture. The notes represented unsecured obligations that were subordinated to the Amended Credit Facility and were fully and unconditionally guaranteed by certain of the company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries.
 
During fiscal 2010, the company purchased $18.5 million in face value of the 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes at an average of 92 percent of par. The company recorded a pre-tax gain of $1.3 million, representing the cash discount received, net of the related write-off of applicable deferred financing costs.
 
During fiscal 2009, the company purchased $34.0 million in face value of the 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes at an average of 87 percent of par. The company recorded a pre-tax gain of $4.2 million, representing the cash discount received net of the related write-off of applicable deferred financing costs. This pre-tax gain is reflected on the purchase of notes line item in the statement of operations.
 
On March 1, 2010, the company redeemed all outstanding principal amount of the 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes of approximately $47.5 million at par early, which was announced on January 5, 2010. As such, the company has classified the senior subordinated notes as short-term at January 30, 2010.
 
Note 7 — Capital Stock
 
Shareholders’ Rights Plan
 
On February 26, 2007, the company amended and restated its Shareholders’ Rights Plan (the “Rights Plan”). Under the Rights Plan, as amended and restated, one right is issued for each common share outstanding. The rights are exercisable only if a person or group buys or announces a tender offer for 15 percent or more of the outstanding common shares. When exercisable, each right initially entitles a holder of common shares to purchase one common share for $52.17 or under certain circumstances one common share for $0.43. The rights, which do not have voting privileges, expire at the close of business on October 31, 2010, but may be redeemed by the Board of Directors prior to that time, under certain circumstances, for $0.005 per right. Until the rights become exercisable, they have no effect on earnings per share.
 
Right to Acquire Shares
 
The company is a party to an agreement with certain members of the two founding families of the company, whereby under certain circumstances, the company has a right of first refusal to acquire, at market prices, common shares disposed of by either of the families. Approximately 1.0 million shares are subject to this agreement as of January 30, 2010.
 
Note 8 — Stock-Based Compensation
 
The company has various stock-based compensation plans that it utilizes as compensation for its Board of Directors, executive officers, senior management and other key employees. The company issues common shares and stock options under these various stock-based compensation plans. Stock-based compensation expense resulting from the issuance of restricted shares and stock options is recognized over the vesting period of the awards.
 
Summarized below are the various plans used by the company to administer its stock-based compensation award programs.
 


65


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 8 — Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)
 
     
Plan   Overview
 
 
2008 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2008 Plan”)
  Approved by Shareholders on June 11, 2008. Allows for the grant of stock appreciation rights, stock awards, stock options, stock purchase rights and incentive compensation awards (payable in shares or cash) to employees and non-employee directors. It also allows the operation of a deferred stock program for non-employee directors. At January 30, 2010, 272,725 stock options, 714,781 restricted shares and 4,906 deferred stock units were outstanding under the 2008 Plan.
 
 
2008 Associate Stock Ownership Plan
  Approved by Shareholders on June 11, 2008. It allows the operation of an employee stock purchase program.
 
 
1998 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “1998 Plan”)
  Previously used to grant stock appreciation rights, stock awards, stock options, stock purchase rights and incentive compensation awards (payable in shares or cash) to employees and non-employee directors. It also allowed the operation of an employee stock purchase program and a deferred stock program for non-employee directors. At January 30, 2010, 1,063,559 stock options, 406,120 restricted shares and 21,906 deferred stock units were outstanding under the 1998 Plan. This plan terminated on June 3, 2008. The termination of the plan does not affect awards that are currently outstanding under the plan.
 
 
1996 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “Directors Stock Option Plan”)
  Previously used to award stock options to non-employee directors. The plan is no longer used to grant stock options. During fiscal 2010, the remaining 3,225 options were exercised, so there were no options outstanding under the Directors Stock Option Plan at January 30, 2010. The Directors Stock Option Plan was deregistered on September 21, 2009.
 
Stock appreciation rights, stock awards, stock options, stock purchase rights and incentive compensation awards (payable in shares or cash) are available for grant to non-employee directors, executive officers and employees under the 2008 Plan. The Compensation Committee oversees the 2008 Plan, specifically approves all awards to non-employee directors, executive officers and other senior management employees, and approves, on a program basis, grants to other employees. Stock options, time-based restricted shares and performance shares have been issued under this plan.
 
Stock Options
 
The company does not grant stock options with an exercise price below fair market value on the date of issuance. The employee options granted under the 2008 Plan generally become exercisable ratably over a three or four-year span for each full year of continuous employment or service following the date of grant. Any non-employee director stock options granted under the 2008 Plan generally would become exercisable to the extent of one-fourth of the optioned shares for each full year of continuous service following the date of grant and are exercisable at their vesting date or upon termination if the non-employee director terminates service one year or more after the grant date. No options have been granted to non-employee directors under the 2008 Plan. Both the employee and non-employee director stock options expire seven years after the date of the

66


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 8 — Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)
 
grant. Stock options granted under the 2008 Plan may become exercisable or expire under different terms as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
 
The employee and non-employee director stock options granted under the 1998 Plan generally become exercisable to the extent of one-fourth of the optioned shares for each full year of continuous employment or service following the date of grant and as of fiscal 2008, non-employee director stock options are exercisable at their vesting date or upon termination if the non-employee director terminates service one year or more after the grant date. Both the employee and non-employee stock options generally expire seven years after the date of the grant, though some options granted in the past had ten-year expiration dates. Stock options granted under the 1998 Plan may become exercisable or expire under different terms as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
 
The following table summarizes activity, pricing and other information for the company’s stock options for fiscal 2010:
 
                                 
          Weighted-Average
    Weighted-Average
    Aggregate
 
    Number of
    Exercise Price
    Remaining
    Intrinsic
 
    Options     Per Option     Contractual Term     Value(a)  
 
Outstanding at January 31, 2009
    1,744,845     $ 18.57                  
Granted
    278,702       12.76                  
Exercised
    (634,694 )     18.46                  
Cancelled
    (52,569 )     16.99                  
                                 
Outstanding at January 30, 2010
    1,336,284     $ 17.47       4.5 years     $ 23,458,038  
                                 
Expected to vest
    1,284,238     $ 17.59       4.5 years     $ 22,386,858  
                                 
Exercisable at January 30, 2010
    396,975     $ 21.77       3.2 years     $ 5,258,528  
                                 
 
 
(a) The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the fair value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option.
 
Restricted Share Awards — Time-Based Awards
 
The vesting periods for the restricted shares and restricted stock units granted under the 2008 Plan are up to four years for employee restricted shares, and one year for non-employee director restricted shares and restricted stock units. The vesting periods for the restricted shares and restricted stock units granted under the 1998 Plan during fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008 are up to four years for employee restricted shares, and one year for non-employee director restricted shares and restricted stock units. As of fiscal 2008, the restrictions lapse on restricted shares and restricted stock unit awards when a non-employee director terminates service one year or more after the grant date and a pro rata acceleration of the lapse of restrictions occurs when a director terminates service less than one year after such grants. All restrictions on restricted shares and restricted stock units terminate if the grantee remains in the continuous service of the company throughout the vesting period.
 
As of January 30, 2010, 1,120,901 restricted shares were outstanding in which the restrictions lapse upon the achievement of continued employment over a specified period of time (time-based restricted share awards).


67


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 8 — Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)
 
The following table summarizes activity for the 2008 Plan and 1998 Plan for time-based restricted stock awards for fiscal 2010:
 
                 
          Weighted-
 
    Number of
    Average Grant
 
    Shares     Date Fair Value  
 
Outstanding at January 31, 2009
    794,654     $ 16.37  
Granted — time-based
    553,291       14.06  
Granted — performance-based (a)
    165,634       12.68  
Vested
    (365,069 )     17.92  
Cancelled
    (27,609 )     14.70  
                 
Outstanding at January 30, 2010
    1,120,901     $ 14.22  
                 
 
 
a — represents performance-based awards that became time-restricted share awards upon the achievement of the performance criteria as of January 30, 2010.
 
The fair value of restricted shares is determined based on the closing trading price of the company’s shares on the grant date.
 
During fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, the company granted time-based restricted share awards with weighted-average grant-date fair values of $13.74, $14.84 and $24.00, respectively. As of January 30, 2010, there was $5.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted awards expected to vest, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years. During fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, the total fair value of shares fully vested was $6.5 million, $5.6 million and $4.8 million, respectively.
 
Restricted Shares — Performance-Based Awards
 
The performance-based awards approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors during fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 are issued only upon the achievement of specific measurable performance criteria. Performance shares are awarded at plus or minus the target grant depending upon the level of achievement of the specified performance metric at the end of the fiscal year. In fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 the company granted performance shares to its officers. The performance measurement associated with the fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 performance shares was the company’s earnings per share during each fiscal year
 
In fiscal 2010, the threshold for earning any performance shares was set at earnings per share of $0.69 per share. The Maximum payout was 150 percent of Target which was reduced from 200 percent of Target in fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008. Target was set at $0.86 per share and maximum was set at $0.95 per share. The achievement of the Target performance level for earnings per share would have resulted in the issuance of 110,422 shares. Fiscal 2010 earnings per share were $2.51, which exceeded “Maximum” performance. As a result, the executive officers and other employees receiving performance shares earned 150 percent of their target performance shares, which amounted to 165,634 shares. The expense for performance-based awards is recognized over the vesting period when the related criteria are probable of being achieved. The fiscal 2010 performance shares issued will vest in equal installments over either a three or four-year period beginning one year after the original grant date. Expense of $0.9 million was recognized during fiscal 2010 for these performance shares.
 
In fiscal 2009, the threshold for earning any performance shares was set at earnings per share of $0.72 per share. Target was set at $0.90 per share and maximum was set at $1.08 per share. The achievement of the Target performance level for earnings per share would have resulted in the issuance of 135,675 shares. Fiscal


68


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 8 — Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)
 
2009 earnings per share were $0.86, which was between Threshold and Target. As a result, the executive officers and other employees receiving performance shares earned approximately 78 percent of their target performance shares, which amounted to 105,580 shares. The expense for performance-based awards is recognized over the vesting period when the related criteria are probable of being achieved. The fiscal 2009 performance shares issued will vest in equal installments over either a three or four-year period following the date of grant. Expense of $0.7 million was recognized during fiscal 2009 for these performance shares.
 
In fiscal 2008, the threshold for earning any performance shares was set at earnings per share of $0.61 per share. Target was set at $0.75 per share and maximum was set at $0.91 per share. The achievement of the Target performance level for earnings per share would have resulted in the issuance of 97,100 shares. The expense for performance-based awards is recognized over the vesting period when the related criteria are probable of being achieved. Based upon the company’s fiscal 2008 results, 5,633 performance shares were issued, which will vest in equal installments over a four-year period following the date of grant. Expense of $0.1 million was recognized during fiscal 2008 for these performance shares.
 
Stock Value Bonus Plan
 
Effective for fiscal 2010, the Stock Value Bonus Plan takes the participant’s long-term incentive (“LTI”) value and converts it to units based on the closing stock price at the grant date. During fiscal 2010, the company granted cash-settled payouts with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $12.68. At the end of fiscal 2010, the closing stock price on the third business day following the year-end earnings release was multiplied by the number of units to determine the actual LTI incentive, which is limited to 150 percent of the fair market value of the underlying common shares on the grant date. The value was locked in and will be paid in equal installments over a two or three-year vesting period if the grantee remains in the continuous service of the company throughout the vesting period.
 
As of January 30, 2010, the company recognized $1.9 million in compensation expense related to the fiscal year 2010 Stock Value Bonus Plan payout and there was $1.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the Plan expected to vest, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years.
 
Shares Available to Grant
 
The maximum aggregate number of shares that may be issued or delivered under the 2008 Plan is 1,825,000 shares. Any shares that are subject to awards of stock options or stock appreciation rights are counted against this limit as one share for every one share delivered under the award. Any shares that are subject to awards other than stock options or stock appreciation rights are counted against this limit as 1.57 shares for every one share delivered under those awards. The number of shares available for future awards under the 2008 Plan as of January 30, 2010 was 866,344. In addition, shares subject to prior awards made under the 1998 Plan that are forfeited become available for grant under the 2008 Plan.
 
Employee Stock Purchase Program
 
The employee stock purchase program (the 2008 Associate Stock Ownership Plan or “2008 ASOP”) enables all employees, except temporary and seasonal employees, to purchase shares of the company’s common shares on offering dates at six-month intervals, at a purchase price equal to 85 percent of the lesser of the fair market value of the common shares on the first or last day of the offering period. The 2008 ASOP meets the requirements of Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the company is, therefore, not required to file income tax returns or pay income taxes with respect to the plan. The company obtained shareholder approval of the 2008 ASOP at its 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The total number of shares


69


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 8 — Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)
 
authorized for sale over the term of the 2008 ASOP is limited to 600,000 shares. Prior to the 2008 ASOP, the company operated an employee stock purchase plan (“1998 ASOP”) under its 1998 Plan, which expired on June 3, 1998.
 
During fiscal 2010, stock purchase rights of 123,153 shares were granted and exercised under the 2008 ASOP. Stock purchase rights of 146,249 shares and 134,942 shares, respectively, were granted and exercised under the 1998 ASOP during fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively. The 15 percent discount from market value granted to 2008 and 1998 ASOP participants on the purchase of shares at the end of each accumulation period represents the company’s non-cash contribution to the 2008 and 1998 ASOP and is recognized as compensation expense. The stock-based compensation expense was not significant for any of the years presented.
 
Non-Employee Directors Deferred Stock Program
 
The company maintains a deferred stock program for non-employee directors under its 2008 Plan. This program allows non-employee directors to elect to convert their cash compensation into deferred stock units. Under this feature, non-employee directors make an irrevocable election prior to each calendar year whereby they can elect to convert a percentage (0 percent to 100 percent in 25 percent increments) of their cash compensation for the following calendar year to deferred stock units. The conversion of cash compensation to deferred stock units is based on the closing market price of the company’s common shares on the date the cash compensation would have been payable if it were paid in cash. These deferred stock units are credited to an account of each non-employee director, although no stock is issued until the earlier of an elected distribution date, as selected by the non-employee director, or retirement. Prior to the 2008 Plan, the company operated a deferred stock program for non-employee directors under its 1998 Plan, which expired on June 3, 1998.
 
During fiscal 2010, 3,052 deferred stock units were deferred under the 2008 plan. During fiscal 2009, 1,854 deferred stock units were deferred under the 2008 plan, while 1,905 deferred stock units were deferred under the 1998 Plan. During fiscal 2008, 842 deferred stock units were deferred under the deferred stock program under the 1998 Plan.
 
Note 9 — Savings Plan Retirement and Postretirement Benefits
 
The company sponsors the Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Savings Plan”), which is a tax deferred savings plan whereby eligible employees may elect to contribute up to the lesser of 15 percent of annual compensation or the statutory maximum. The company makes a 50 percent matching contribution up to a maximum employee contribution of six percent of the employee’s annual compensation. The company match is made in cash and is participant-directed. The amount of the company’s matching contributions during fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $1.8 million, $1.8 million and $1.7 million, respectively. The company does not provide postretirement health care benefits for its employees.
 
The company participates in a multi-employer pension plan for its union employees located at the Hudson Distribution Center. The Plan is administered by the United Steelworkers Union. The Plan is the “Steelworkers Pension Trust” and the company contributed $0.5 million, $0.6 million and $0.6 million for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
Note 10 — Commitments and Contingencies
 
On July 21, 2008, a purported wage and hour class action was filed against the company in Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles. In the complaint, as amended, six former company employees, individually and on behalf of the purported class members, alleged, among other things, that certain current and former California store team leaders employed by the company since July 21, 2004 were


70


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 10 — Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)
 
classified improperly as exempt employees (and thus not paid for overtime work), and that current and former hourly employees employed by the company’s California stores since July 21, 2004 missed rest and meal breaks for which they were not properly compensated and at times worked off the clock without compensation. In November 2009, the court granted preliminary approval of a negotiated settlement. The negotiated settlement provides for the payment by the company of up to $5.0 million, depending on the number of claims that are filed by the purported class members. The company has fully reserved for the total amount expected to be incurred by the company in connection with this litigation and the negotiated settlement.
 
The company is involved in various litigation matters in the ordinary course of its business. The company is not currently involved in any litigation that it expects, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
 
Note 11 — Leases
 
With the exception of one large-format store, all of the company’s retail stores operate out of leased facilities. Our store leases generally have initial terms of five to 15 years with renewal options for up to 20 years. The company also leases certain computer and store equipment, with lease terms that are generally five years or less. Included in the future minimum rental payments is the operating lease for our distribution center located in Visalia, California. The lease has an initial term of 20 years.
 
The company recognizes lease expense for step rent provisions, escalation clauses, rent holiday, capital improvement funding and other lease concessions using the straight-line method over the minimum lease term. The company does have lease arrangements that have minimum lease payments dependent on an existing index or rate, such as the consumer price index or the prime interest rate. Certain leases contain escalation clauses and provide for contingent rents based on a percent of sales in excess of defined minimums. In certain instances, the company is required to pay its pro rata share of real estate taxes and common area maintenance expenses.
 
The following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases. Future minimum rental payments are reduced by $17.0 million of sublease income.
 
         
    Minimum
 
Fiscal Year-Ended
  Rentals  
(Dollars in millions)      
 
2011
  $ 151.9  
2012
    139.5  
2013
    125.1  
2014
    106.9  
2015
    89.9  
Thereafter
    213.7  
         
    $ 827.0  
         


71


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 11 — Leases (Continued)
 
Rent expense excluding common area maintenance and real estate taxes was as follows:
 
                         
Fiscal Year-Ended
  2010     2009     2008  
(Dollars in millions)                  
 
Minimum rent expense
  $ 149.6     $ 147.9     $ 146.4  
Contingent rent expense
    1.7       1.5       1.6  
Sublease rent expense
    (8.7 )     (9.9 )     (9.6 )
                         
    $ 142.6     $ 139.5     $ 138.4  
                         
 
Note 12 — Segment Reporting
 
At January 30, 2010, the company operated 228 large-format stores and 518 small-format stores. The company considers stores that generally average more than approximately 24,000 square feet of retail space as large-format stores. The company’s small-format stores generally average less than approximately 24,000 square feet. The size of the store is not the only factor in determining its classification as large-format or small-format. The most important distinction for determining the classification of a large-format store is whether or not stores in the range have been recently built or remodeled and contain a broad assortment of craft categories.
 
The company has reportable segments, which include large-format stores, small-format stores and other. The financial results of the company’s Joann.com Internet business are included in the other segment. The small-format stores offer a complete selection of fabric and a convenience assortment of crafts, artificial floral, finished seasonal and home décor merchandise. The large-format stores offer an expanded and more comprehensive product assortment than the small-format stores. The large-format stores also generally offer custom framing and educational programs that the small-format stores do not. The “other” category includes unallocated corporate assets and overhead in addition to the operating results of the Joann.com Internet business. The segments are evaluated based on revenues and operating profit contribution to the total corporation. All income and expense items below operating profit are not allocated to the segments and are not disclosed.
 
Certain information not routinely used in the management of these segments or information that is impractical to report is not shown. The company does not report assets other than property, equipment and leasehold improvements by segment because not all assets are allocated to segments for purposes of measurement by the company’s chief operating decision maker. The accounting policies of the company’s segments are consistent with those described in Note 1.
 


72


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 12 — Segment Reporting (Continued)
 
                                 
    Large-format
    Small-format
             
    Stores     Stores     Other     Consolidated  
    (Dollars in millions)  
 
Fiscal 2010
                               
Net sales
  $ 1,072.9     $ 879.9     $ 37.9     $ 1,990.7  
Store pre-opening and closing costs
    3.7       8.0             11.7  
Depreciation and amortization
    31.5       10.6       14.2       56.3  
Operating profit (loss)
    119.6       128.4       (133.9 )     114.1  
Capital expenditures
    10.9       17.6       11.2       39.7  
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net
    148.1       53.5       92.1       293.7  
                                 
Fiscal 2009
                               
Net sales
  $ 997.7     $ 867.7     $ 35.7     $ 1,901.1  
Store pre-opening and closing costs
    5.9       6.4             12.3  
Depreciation and amortization
    31.6       9.3       13.3       54.2  
Operating profit (loss)
    69.1       95.9       (124.3 )     40.7  
Capital expenditures
    35.5       13.2       26.0       74.7  
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net
    162.7       49.5       102.6       314.8  
                                 
Fiscal 2008
                               
Net sales
  $ 989.4     $ 877.5     $ 11.9     $ 1,878.8  
Store pre-opening and closing costs
    2.7       5.7             8.4  
Depreciation and amortization
    31.6       8.4       11.8       51.8  
Operating profit (loss)
    67.2       96.4       (126.2 )     37.4  
Capital expenditures
    11.5       15.1       11.1       37.7  
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net
    168.6       35.1       93.8       297.5  
                                 
 
Note 13 — Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
 
Summarized below are the unaudited results of operations by quarter for fiscal 2010 and 2009:
 
                                 
    First
    Second
    Third
    Fourth
 
Fiscal 2010
  Quarter     Quarter     Quarter     Quarter  
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)                        
 
Net sales
  $ 460.0     $ 419.4     $ 509.1     $ 602.2  
Gross margin
    222.9       206.6       259.8       286.4  
Net income (loss)
    8.6       (3.2 )     24.1       37.1  
Net income (loss) per common share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.34     $ (0.13 )   $ 0.94     $ 1.42  
Diluted
    0.33       (0.13 )     0.90       1.36  
 

73


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 13 — Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited) (Continued)
 
                                 
    First
    Second
    Third
    Fourth
 
Fiscal 2009
  Quarter     Quarter     Quarter     Quarter  
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)                        
 
Net sales
  $ 446.1     $ 403.0     $ 480.1     $ 571.9  
Gross margin
    206.8       191.8       235.5       248.6  
Net income (loss)
    3.0       (11.7 )     10.2       20.4  
Net income (loss) per common share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.12     $ (0.47 )   $ 0.41     $ 0.81  
Diluted
    0.12       (0.47 )     0.40       0.79  
 
Note 14 — Consolidating Financial Statements
 
The company’s 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes and Amended Credit Facility are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, by the company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Notes are subordinated to the company’s Amended Credit Facility. Effective July 5, 2009, the company restructured its legal entities, resulting in all but one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries becoming consolidated into the parent entity and the transfer of certain assets from the parent to a newly-formed subsidiary which became a guarantor of the Notes and Amended Credit Facility. The guarantor subsidiaries represent the new subsidiary and one remaining subsidiary that were not consolidated into the parent entity. On March 1, 2010, the company redeemed all outstanding principal amount of its 7.5 percent senior subordinated notes of approximately $47.5 million at par early, which was announced on January 5, 2010.

74


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 14 — Consolidating Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Summarized consolidating financial information of the company (excluding its subsidiaries) and the guarantor subsidiaries as of and for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
 
                                                                 
    January 30, 2010     January 31, 2009  
Consolidating
        Guarantor
                      Guarantor
             
Balance Sheets
  Parent     Subsidiaries     Eliminations     Consolidated     Parent     Subsidiaries     Eliminations     Consolidated  
    (Dollars in millions)  
 
Assets
                                                               
Current assets:
                                                               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 217.1     $             $ 217.1     $ 55.0     $ 25.6             $ 80.6  
Inventories
    416.8                     416.8       206.5       222.9               429.4  
Deferred income taxes
    20.1       2.2               22.3       14.8       7.3               22.1  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    27.0       2.9               29.9       25.5       6.2               31.7  
                                                                 
Total current assets
    681.0       5.1             686.1       301.8       262.0             563.8  
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net
    281.8       11.9               293.7       165.5       149.3               314.8  
Goodwill, net
          11.6               11.6       11.6                     11.6  
Other assets
    3.1       5.9               9.0       (3.9 )     13.4               9.5  
Investment in subsidiaries
    41.5             (41.5 )           100.0             (100.0 )      
Intercompany receivable
          30.7       (30.7 )           307.7             (307.7 )      
                                                                 
Total assets
  $ 1,007.4     $ 65.2     $ (72.2 )   $ 1,000.4     $ 882.7     $ 424.7     $ (407.7 )   $ 899.7  
                                                                 
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
                                                               
Current liabilities:
                                                               
Accounts payable
  $ 147.4     $ 3.7             $ 151.1     $ 158.6     $ (13.5 )           $ 145.1  
Accrued expenses
    100.9       27.7               128.6       102.9                     102.9  
Senior subordinated notes — short term
    47.5                     47.5                              
                                                                 
Total current liabilities
    295.8       31.4             327.2       261.5       (13.5 )           248.0  
Long-term debt
                              66.0                     66.0  
Long-term deferred income taxes
    14.7       (12.5 )             2.2       (4.8 )     6.6               1.8  
Lease obligations and other long-term liabilities
    100.6       4.8               105.4       82.3       23.9               106.2  
Intercompany payable
    30.7             (30.7 )                 307.7       (307.7 )      
Shareholders’ equity:
                                                               
Preferred stock
                                                   
Common stock
    1.5                     1.5       1.4                     1.4  
Additional paid-in capital
    234.7                     234.7       211.7                     211.7  
Retained earnings
    377.0       41.5       (41.5 )     377.0       310.4       100.0       (100.0 )     310.4  
                                                                 
      613.2       41.5       (41.5 )     613.2       523.5       100.0       (100.0 )     523.5  
Treasury stock, at cost
    (47.6 )                   (47.6 )     (45.8 )                   (45.8 )
                                                                 
Total shareholders’ equity
    565.6       41.5       (41.5 )     565.6       477.7       100.0       (100.0 )     477.7  
                                                                 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 1,007.4     $ 65.2     $ (72.2 )   $ 1,000.4     $ 882.7     $ 424.7     $ (407.7 )   $ 899.7  
                                                                 
 


75


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 14 — Consolidating Financial Statements (Continued)
 
                                                                 
    Fiscal Year-Ended  
    January 30, 2010     January 31, 2009  
Consolidating Statements
        Guarantor
                      Guarantor
             
of Operations
  Parent     Subsidiaries     Eliminations     Consolidated     Parent     Subsidiaries     Eliminations     Consolidated  
    (Dollars in millions)  
 
Net sales
  $ 1,628.9     $ 580.1     $ (218.3 )   $ 1,990.7     $ 1,029.0     $ 1,447.8     $ (575.7 )   $ 1,901.1  
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)
    846.9       386.4       (218.3 )     1,015.0       613.7       980.6       (575.7 )     1,018.6  
                                                                 
Gross margin
    782.0       193.7             975.7       415.3       467.2             882.5  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    649.7       143.9               793.6       388.9       386.4               775.3  
Store pre-opening and closing costs
    9.7       2.0               11.7       7.2       5.1               12.3  
Depreciation and amortization
    41.3       15.0               56.3       28.3       25.9               54.2  
                                                                 
Operating profit (loss)
    81.3       32.8             114.1       (9.1 )     49.8             40.7  
Gain on purchase of senior subordinated notes
    (1.3 )                   (1.3 )     (4.2 )                   (4.2 )
Interest expense, net
    5.0       1.3               6.3       4.2       5.2               9.4  
                                                                 
Income (loss) before income taxes
    77.6       31.5             109.1       (9.1 )     44.6             35.5  
Income tax provision (benefit)
    31.4       11.1               42.5       (1.9 )     15.5               13.6  
                                                                 
Income (loss) before equity income
    46.2       20.4             66.6       (7.2 )     29.1             21.9  
Equity income from subsidiaries
    20.4             (20.4 )           29.1             (29.1 )      
                                                                 
Net income
  $ 66.6     $ 20.4     $ (20.4 )   $ 66.6     $ 21.9     $ 29.1     $ (29.1 )   $ 21.9  
                                                                 
 
                                 
    Fiscal Year-Ended February 2, 2008  
          Guarantor
             
Consolidating Statements of Operations
  Parent     Subsidiaries     Eliminations     Consolidated  
    (Dollars in millions)  
 
Net sales
  $ 1,024.6     $ 1,405.2     $ (551.0 )   $ 1,878.8  
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)
    612.4       945.0       (551.0 )     1,006.4  
                                 
Gross margin
    412.2       460.2             872.4  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    383.9       390.9               774.8  
Store pre-opening and closing costs
    4.0       4.4               8.4  
Depreciation and amortization
    25.8       26.0               51.8  
                                 
Operating (loss) profit
    (1.5 )     38.9             37.4  
Interest expense, net
    5.5       7.0               12.5  
                                 
(Loss) income before income taxes
    (7.0 )     31.9             24.9  
Income tax (benefit) provision
    (1.8 )     11.3               9.5  
                                 
(Loss) income before equity income
    (5.2 )     20.6             15.4  
Equity income from subsidiaries
    20.6             (20.6 )      
                                 
Net income
  $ 15.4     $ 20.6     $ (20.6 )   $ 15.4  
                                 
 

76


 

 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Note 14 — Consolidating Financial Statements (Continued)
 
                                                                 
    Fiscal Year-Ended  
    January 30, 2010     January 31, 2009  
Consolidating Statements of
        Guarantor
                      Guarantor
             
Cash Flows
  Parent     Subsidiaries     Eliminations     Consolidated     Parent     Subsidiaries     Eliminations     Consolidated  
    (Dollars in millions)  
 
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities
  $ 203.1     $ (19.1 )   $     $ 184.0     $ 135.6     $ 22.3     $     $ 157.9  
Net cash flows used for investing activities:
                                                               
Capital expenditures
    (33.2 )     (6.5 )           (39.7 )     (51.6 )     (23.1 )           (74.7 )
Payment for acquisition, net of cash acquired
    (3.1 )                 (3.1 )     (3.1 )                 (3.1 )
                                                                 
Net cash used for investing activities
    (36.3 )     (6.5 )           (42.8 )     (54.7 )     (23.1 )           (77.8 )
Net cash flows used for financing activities:
                                                               
Purchase of senior subordinated notes
    (17.0 )                 (17.0 )     (29.5 )                 (29.5 )
Proceeds from stock-based compensation plans
    13.5                   13.5       6.0                   6.0  
Other, net
    (1.2 )                 (1.2 )     (1.4 )                 (1.4 )
                                                                 
Net cash used for financing activities
    (4.7 )                 (4.7 )     (24.9 )                 (24.9 )
                                                                 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    162.1       (25.6 )           136.5       56.0       (0.8 )           55.2  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
    55.0       25.6             80.6       (1.0 )     26.4             25.4  
                                                                 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
  $ 217.1     $     $     $ 217.1     $ 55.0     $ 25.6     $     $ 80.6  
                                                                 
 
                                 
    Fiscal Year-Ended February 2, 2008  
          Guarantor
             
Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
  Parent     Subsidiaries     Eliminations     Consolidated  
    (Dollars in millions)  
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 55.7     $ 17.9     $     $ 73.6  
Net cash flows used for investing activities:
                               
Capital expenditures
    (19.0 )     (18.7 )           (37.7 )
Payment for acquisition, net of cash acquired
    (11.7 )                 (11.7 )
                                 
Net cash used for investing activities
    (30.7 )     (18.7 )           (49.4 )
Net cash flows used for financing activities:
                               
Net change in revolving credit facility
    (25.3 )                   (25.3 )
Proceeds from stock-based compensation plans
    7.8                   7.8  
Other, net
    0.3                   0.3  
                                 
Net cash used for financing activities
    (17.2 )                 (17.2 )
                                 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    7.8       (0.8 )           7.0  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
    (8.8 )     27.2             18.4  
                                 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
  $ (1.0 )   $ 26.4     $     $ 25.4  
                                 

77


 

 
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
 
None.
 
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
 
Disclosure Controls and Procedures — We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the management of Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. (the “Management”), including our Principal Executive Officer and our Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, Management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
 
In connection with the preparation of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as of January 30, 2010, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our Management, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and our Principal Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting — Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to our Management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
 
Management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 30, 2010. In making its assessment of internal control over financial reporting, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework.”
 
Based on management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting under the criteria established in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework,” we concluded that, as of January 30, 2010, our internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 30, 2010, and their report appears on the next page.
 
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting — There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


78


 

 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.:
 
We have audited Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 30, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
 
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
In our opinion, Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 30, 2010, based on the COSO criteria.
 
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. as of January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, and shareholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended January 30, 2010 and our report dated April 15, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
 
/s/  Ernst & Young LLP
 
Cleveland, Ohio
April 15, 2010


79


 

 
Item 9B.  Other Information
 
None.
 
PART III
 
Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
 
Information required by this Item 10 as to our directors is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the captions “Election of Directors — Nominees” and “Director Qualifications” in our definitive proxy statement for our 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 10, 2010 (the “Proxy Statement”), which is expected to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year.
 
The information regarding the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors and “audit committee financial experts” is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the caption “Corporate Governance and Board Matters — Committees of the Board — The Audit Committee” in the Proxy Statement.
 
Information required by this Item 10 as to our executive officers is included in Part I of this Form 10-K as permitted by Instruction 3 to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K. Information required by Item 405 of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Proxy Statement.
 
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”) is applicable to our directors, officers (including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer) and employees. The Code is posted on our website at www.Joann.com. We intend to disclose on our website any amendment to, or waiver of, any provision of the Code that would be required to be disclosed under the rules of the SEC and NYSE.
 
Item 11.  Executive Compensation
 
The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the captions “Director Compensation,” “Executive Compensation,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation Risk Monitoring,” “Corporate Governance and Board Matters — Committees of the Board — The Compensation Committee” and “Compensation Committee Report” in the Proxy Statement.
 
Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
 
The information required by this Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the captions “Principal Shareholders” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in the Proxy Statement.
 
Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
 
Betty Rosskamm (a member of one of our original founding families and the mother of Alan Rosskamm, a current member of the Board of Directors), Alma Zimmerman, (a member of one of our original founding families and who is now deceased), and the company are parties to an agreement, dated October 30, 2003, as amended on February 22, 2007, relating to their Jo-Ann Stores common shares. Under this agreement, Betty Rosskamm and her lineal descendants and permitted holders (the “Rosskamms”) and Alma Zimmerman and her lineal descendants and permitted holders (the “Zimmermans”) may each sell up to 400,000 common shares in any calendar year but may not sell more than 200,000 of those shares in any 180-day period. If either the Rosskamms or Zimmermans plan to sell a number of their respective common shares in excess of the number permitted under the agreement, they must first offer to sell those shares to the company. Each of the


80


 

Rosskamms and the Zimmermans are permitted to sell an unlimited number of shares to each other free of our right of first refusal.
 
Additional information required by this Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the captions “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Corporate Governance and Board Matters — Board Independence” in the Proxy Statement.
 
Item 14.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services
 
The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the captions “Principal Accounting Firm Fees” and “Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permitted Non-Audit Services” in the Proxy Statement.


81


 

 
PART IV
 
Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
 
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
 
(1) Financial Statements
 
The consolidated financial statements filed as part of this Form 10-K are located as set forth in the index on page 44 of this report.
 
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
 
All schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
 
(3) Exhibits
 
The exhibits listed in the Index to Exhibits, which appears in this Form 10-K below, are filed as part of this Form 10-K.


82


 

 
Index to Exhibits
 
         
Exhibit
   
Number
 
Exhibit Description
 
  3 .1   Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 17, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)
  3 .2   Amended and Restated Code of Regulations (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 17, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)
  4 .1   Indenture between the company and Jo-Ann Stores Supply Chain Management, Inc., Team Jo-Ann, Inc., FCA of Ohio, Inc., and House of Fabrics, Inc., as guarantors, and National City Bank, as trustee, relating to the 7.50% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012, including the form of note (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 15, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
  4 .2   Third Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of February 26, 2007, by and between Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. and National City Bank, as Rights Agent (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the company’s Form 8-A/A filed with the Commission on March 2, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
  10 .1   Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan, as amended (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on December 13, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .2   Schedule to Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan, effective as of November 13, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on December 13, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .3   Schedule to Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan, effective as of October 15, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 15, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .4   Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. Compensation Clawback Policy (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 6, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .5   Form of Compensation Clawback Policy Acknowledgement and Agreement, dated December 31, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 6, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .6   Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. (formerly Fabri-Centers of America, Inc.) 1998 Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended, dated November 13, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on December 13, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .7   Agreement dated October 30, 2003 among Jo-Ann Stores, Inc., Betty Rosskamm and Alma Zimmerman, a member of one of the company’s original founding families and who is now deceased (Second Amended and Restated) (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 15, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .8   Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Agreement dated February 22, 2007 among and between Jo-Ann Stores, Inc., Betty Rosskamm, and Joan Wittenberg, Sandra Zucker and Larry Zimmerman (the successors to Alma Zimmerman, a member of one of the company’s original founding families and who is now deceased) (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 19, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .9   Credit Agreement dated as of April 24, 2001 among the company, as borrower, Fleet National Bank, as Issuing Bank, Fleet Retail Finance Inc., as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, Congress Financial Corporation, as Documentation Agent, GMAC Commercial Credit, LLC, National City Commercial Finance, Inc. and The CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc., as Co-Agents, and Fleet Securities Inc., as Arranger and Syndication Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 19, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
  10 .10   First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of April 24, 2001 (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 19, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)


83


 

         
Exhibit
   
Number
 
Exhibit Description
 
  10 .11   Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of March 17, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 15, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
  10 .12   Third Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of February 18, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 15, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
  10 .13   Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated April 16, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the company’s Form S-4 filed with the Commission on May 24, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
  10 .14   Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated February 23, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 13, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference)
  10 .15   Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated November 5, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on December 13, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
  10 .16   Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended on January 30, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.16 to the company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 17, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .17   Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement of the company (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 23, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .18   Form of Notice of Grant of Non-Qualified Stock Option (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 23, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .19   Letter Agreement entered into on June 29, 2006 between the company and Darrell Webb regarding Mr. Webb’s employment with the company (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on September 7, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .20   Amended Employment Agreement dated February 19, 2008 between the company and Darrell Webb (filed as Exhibit 10.25 to the company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 17, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .21   Letter Agreement entered into on July 10, 2006 between the company and Travis Smith regarding Mr. Smith’s employment with the company (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on September 7, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .22   Amended Employment Agreement dated February 19, 2008 between the company and Travis Smith (filed as Exhibit 10.27 to the company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 17, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .23   Letter Agreement entered into on July 27, 2006 between the company and James Kerr regarding Mr. Kerr’s employment with the company (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on September 7, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .24   Amended Employment Agreement dated February 19, 2008 between the company and James Kerr (filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 17, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .25   Split Dollar Insurance Agreement dated July 27, 2006 between the company and James Kerr (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on September 7, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .26   Lease Agreement dated October 19, 2006 between BPVisalia LLC, as Landlord, and Jo-Ann Stores Supply Chain Management, Inc., as Tenant (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 25, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference)
  10 .27   Split Dollar Insurance Agreement dated August 14, 2007 between the company and Darrell Webb (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 20, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .28   Split Dollar Insurance Agreement dated August 14, 2007 between the company and Travis Smith (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 20, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)*


84


 

         
Exhibit
   
Number
 
Exhibit Description
 
  10 .29   Employment Agreement dated November 19, 2007 between the company and Kenneth Haverkost (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on December 13, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .30   Form of Director Indemnification Agreements (filed as Exhibit 10.37 to the company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 17, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)
  10 .31   Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 5, 2008, among the company as Lead Borrower, the Lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Issuing Bank, Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, Wells Fargo Retail Finance, LLC, National City Business Credit, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as Co-Documentation Agents, and Banc of America Securities LLC, as Sole Lead Arranger and Book Manager (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on December 11, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)
  10 .32   Split Dollar Insurance Agreement dated October 15, 2008 between the company and Kenneth Haverkost (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 15, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .33   Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Appendix A to the company’s 2008 Proxy Statement filed with the Commission on April 28, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .34   Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. 2008 Associate Stock Ownership Plan (filed as Appendix B to the company’s 2008 Proxy Statement filed with the Commission on April 28, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .35   Employment Agreement dated March 16, 2009 between the company and Darrell Webb (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 18, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  10 .36   Letter Agreement dated April 5, 2010 between the company and Darrell Webb amending Mr. Webb’s employment agreement dated March 16, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 5, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)*
  21     Subsidiaries of Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
  23     Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors
  24     Power of Attorney
  31 .1   Section 302 Certification By Chief Executive Officer
  31 .2   Section 302 Certification By Chief Financial Officer
  32 .1   Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
 
 
* Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement


85


 

 
SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
 
April 15, 2010                                       
By: 
/s/  Darrell Webb

 
Darrell Webb
Chief Executive Officer
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
 
         
Signature
 
Title
 
/s/  Darrell Webb

Darrell Webb
  Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
     
/s/  James Kerr

James Kerr
  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
/s/  Scott Cowen*

Scott Cowen
  Director
/s/  Joseph DePinto*

Joseph DePinto
  Director
/s/  Ira Gumberg*

Ira Gumberg
  Director
/s/  Patricia Morrison*

Patricia Morrison
  Director
/s/  Frank Newman*

Frank Newman
  Director
/s/  David Perdue*

David Perdue
  Director
/s/  Beryl Raff*

Beryl Raff
  Director
/s/  Alan Rosskamm*

Alan Rosskamm
  Director
/s/  Tracey Travis*

Tracey Travis
  Director
 
*The undersigned, by signing his name hereto, does hereby sign this Form 10-K Annual Report on behalf of the above-named directors of Jo-Ann Stores, Inc., pursuant to powers of attorney executed on behalf of each of such directors.
 
April 15, 2010                                       
By: 
/s/  James Kerr

 
James Kerr, Attorney-in-Fact


86