GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL GROUP INC - FORM 10-K

Attached files

file	filename
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION - GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL GROUP INC	gia_ex312.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION - GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL GROUP INC	gia_ex311.htm
EX-32.2 - CERTIFICATION - GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL GROUP INC	gia_ex322.htm
EX-21.1 - SUBSIDIARIES OF GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. - GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL GROUP INC	gia_ex211.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION - GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL GROUP INC	gia_ex321.htm
EX-11.1 - STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS - GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL GROUP INC	gia_ex111.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission File Number: 001-33884

	GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
	(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		20-3973956
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

3201 Griffin Road, 4th Floor, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33312

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(954) 985-1500

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock of $0.01 par value per share		NYSE Amex Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

________________

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	o	Smaller reporting company	þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $6,244,756 as of June 30, 2009.

As of March 31, 2010, 3,795,061 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, were issued and outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference: None.

GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.

2009 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I

Item 1.	Business.		4
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.		14
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments.		28
Item 2.	Properties.		28
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings.		29
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.		29

PART II

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.		30
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data.		33
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.		36
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.		47
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.		49
Item 9.	Changes and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.		74
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures.		74
Item 9B.	Other Information.		75

PART III

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.		76
Item 11.	Executive Compensation.		79
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.		91
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.		93
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services.		95

PART IV

Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.		97
	Signatures		102

PART I

Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

Our representatives and we may from time to time make written or oral statements that are "forward-looking," including statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, reports to our stockholders and news releases. All statements that express expectations, estimates, forecasts or projections are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Act. In addition, other written or oral statements which constitute forward-looking statements may be made by us or on our behalf. Words such as "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," "projects," "forecasts," "may," "should," variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are difficult to predict. These risks may relate to, without limitation:

·	our business strategy;

●	our value proposition;

●	the market opportunity for our services, including expected demand for our services;

●	information regarding the replacement, deployment, acquisition and financing of certain numbers and types of aircraft, and projected expenses associated therewith;

●	costs of compliance with FAA regulations, Department of Homeland Security regulations and other rules and acts of Congress;

●	the ability to pass taxes, fuel costs, inflation, and various expense to our customers;

●	certain projected financial obligations;

●	our estimates regarding our capital requirements;

●	any of our other plans, objectives, expectations and intentions contained in this report that are not historical facts;

●	changing external competitive, business, budgeting, fuel supply, weather or economic conditions;

●	changes in our relationships with employees or code share partners;

●	availability and cost of funds for financing new aircraft and our ability to profitably manage our existing fleet;

●	adverse reaction and publicity that might result from any accidents;

●	the impact of current or future laws and government investigations and regulations affecting the airline industry and our operations;

●	additional terrorist attacks; and

●	consumer unwillingness to incur greater costs for flights.

Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in or suggested by such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date hereof. Readers should carefully review the factors described herein and in other documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Annual Reports on Form 10-K, and any Current Reports on Form 8-K filed by us.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

Overview of Our Business

Gulfstream International Group, Inc. is a holding company that operates two independent subsidiaries: Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc. (“Gulfstream” or “the Airline”) and Gulfstream Training Academy, Inc. (the “Academy”). References to “Company” “we,” “our,” and “us,” refer to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. and either or both of Gulfstream or the Academy.

Gulfstream is a commercial airline currently operating 147 scheduled flights per day, serving nine destinations in Florida, ten destinations in the Bahamas, and five destinations from Continental Airline’s Cleveland hub under the Department of Transportation’s Essential Air Service Program. Our fleet consists of 23 B1900D, 19-seat, turbo-prop aircraft. Operating from our headquarters in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Gulfstream was the sixteenth largest regional airline group in the U.S. in 2008 in terms of number of passengers flown, according to the Regional Airline Association. We operate under a principal code share and alliance agreement with Continental Airlines. We are also party to code share agreements with United and Copa Airlines of Panama. In addition to the daily scheduled flights, Gulfstream also offers frequent charter flights within our geographic operating region, including licensed flights to Cuba.

The Academy provides flight training services to fully-licensed commercial pilots. The Academy’s principal program is our First Officer Program, which allows participants to obtain a Second-In-Command type rating in approximately four months. Following receipt of this rating, pilots fly between 250 and 400 hours performing first officer duties at Gulfstream. By attending the Academy, pilots are able to enhance their ability to secure a permanent position with a commercial airline. The Academy’s graduates are typically hired by various regional airlines, including Gulfstream. In 2009 and 2008, 42 and 59 pilots, respectively, entered the First Officer Program.

History

Our business was started by Thomas L. Cooper with the formation of Gulfstream in 1988. Gulfstream began as an airline offering on-demand charter service utilizing nine-passenger, piston-powered aircraft. In 1990, we initiated scheduled commercial service by offering flights from Miami to several locations in the Bahamas. In 1994, after introducing turbo-prop aircraft, we signed our first code share agreement with United Airlines and expanded our routes in both Florida and the Bahamas. Since 1994, we have signed a series of code share agreements with our current code share partners.

Gulfstream first entered into a code share and alliance agreement with Continental, our principal alliance partner, in 1997. Gulfstream and Continental have amended the agreement on several occasions, most recently in March of 2006, which amendment included an extension of the term to 2012. Prior to our acquisition of Gulfstream, Continental assisted Gulfstream from time to time with financial transactions and aircraft acquisitions, and today holds a warrant to purchase 10% of Gulfstream’s outstanding shares.

In December 2005, Gulfstream International Group, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware by a group of investors as Gulfstream Acquisition Group, Inc., and changed its name to Gulfstream International Group, Inc. on June 13, 2007. We were formed to acquire Gulfstream and the Academy. In March 2006, we acquired approximately 89% of G-Air Holdings Corp., Inc. (“G-Air”), which owned approximately 95% of Gulfstream at that time, and 100% of the Academy, which held the remaining 5% of Gulfstream. Subsequently, we acquired the remaining 11% of G-Air. Following these transactions, we are the sole owner of Gulfstream and the Academy, subject to Continental’s warrant to purchase 10% of the outstanding shares of Gulfstream’s common stock.

Our Competitive Strengths

· Long-standing code share agreements with multiple major airlines. Gulfstream has code share agreements with Continental and United. We have been a partner with each of these airlines for more than five years. Recently, our code share agreement with Continental was extended through 2012. We believe that utilizing such agreements enhances our ability to generate revenue from both local and connecting traffic. We also believe that through our alliances, we are able to control costs by contracting for reservations, ground handling and other services at lower costs. In addition, these code share relationships allow us to offer our passengers easy booking through reservation systems maintained by our code share partners and the benefits of associated frequent flier programs.

· Well positioned in the Bahamas market. We are a leading carrier to the Bahamas and serve more destinations in the Bahamas than any other U.S. airline. We maintain our own facilities and employees at all ten of our destinations in the Bahamas and we enjoy a close cooperative relationship with Bahamian business and tourism officials. We believe that our focus on the Bahamian market allows us to identify new market opportunities and develop those opportunities more efficiently than new market entrants.

· Diverse route network and utilization of small aircraft. We have connecting hubs in several key Florida cities, daily charter flights to Cuba, and flights from Continental Airline’s Cleveland hub to five smaller cities in Pennsylvania, New York, and West Virginia. This network enables us to establish multiple flight crew and maintenance bases that reduce overall operating costs and enhance operational reliability. The size and scale of this operation create practical barriers to entry for new entrants and increases our ability to shift capacity according to seasonal and business-versus-leisure demand patterns. Additionally, the relatively small size and efficiency of our turboprop aircraft combine to produce trip costs that are substantially lower than operators flying larger and more expensive jet aircraft.

· We offer reliable, quality service. We have been consistently among the highest-ranked regional airlines in the country in terms of reliability. For 2009, our on-time performance was 79.5%, compared to the 79.6% average on-time performance reported by the Department of Transportation for all reporting airlines. Gulfstream has received the FAA Diamond Award, the highest level of recognition for maintenance training, for 13 consecutive years, including 2009.

· The Academy has a unique first officer program. We believe the Academy has established a strong reputation for quality instruction. We offer our students the opportunity to accumulate flight hours with an airline regulated under Part 121 of the FAA regulations, sometimes referred to as Part 121 flight hours. Many airlines require pilot applicants to have a certain number of Part 121 flight hours or equivalent experience and so our students enhance their hiring prospects with regional airlines through our first officer program. In addition, the Academy provides Gulfstream with a reliable and cost-effective source of first officers and pilots.

Our Strategy

Our business strategy is to utilize small-capacity aircraft to target markets that are unserved or underserved by competing airlines. Small capacity aircraft allow for lower costs per flight, and enable us to operate profitably with fewer passengers per flight than airlines operating larger equipment.

· Utilize turboprop aircraft to selectively expand the number of markets we serve. We use 19-passenger turboprop aircraft. Turboprop aircraft offer substantially lower acquisition costs than regional jet aircraft and, in addition, tend to be more fuel efficient than other aircraft. We believe this allows us to provide service on short, lower volume routes and achieve attractive margins, in contrast to airlines that have focused their fleets on larger regional jet aircraft, increasingly in the 70- to 90-seat category. The efficiencies associated with turboprop aircraft are more pronounced on short haul routes such as ours. Additionally, turboprop aircraft have the ability to operate out of airports with runways that are too short for certain regional jets.

We are actively seeking opportunities to grow by adding new routes, aircraft and alliance partners,. We look for unserved or underserved short haul city pairs that have a high degree of potential for long-term profitability. These opportunities will likely include operating in new geographic areas outside our current Florida base. For example, in October 2008 we added flights from Continental Airline’s Cleveland hub to five small cities in Pennsylvania, New York and West Virginia under the Department of Transportation’s Essential Air Service program. We have held discussions with various parties concerning new code share arrangements and additional turboprop aircraft. Any potential transaction involving a new code share partner would require Continental’s prior consent. There is no assurance that we will be able to reach acceptable terms with regard to any potential transaction and if we are able to do so, that Continental would consent to such a transaction.

· Use of alliance and code share agreements. Utilizing our alliance and code share agreements enhances our ability to generate revenue for both local and connecting traffic. By having multiple code share partners, we are able to increase our revenue per flight by accessing several sources of connecting passengers relative to what would be available within a single code share partnership arrangement. This is particularly true given that our main connecting airports are not hubs for any of our code share partners. These agreements also provide the opportunity to contract for services at lower costs, as well as to gain access to airport and other facilities, relative to what we would be able to do independently.

Further, we believe that by providing high quality service under our code share partnerships with multiple airlines in existing markets, our opportunities for expanding the scope of our relationship with those carriers may be greater.

· Increase enrollment at the Academy. We seek to increase enrollment at the Academy through implementation of various marketing initiatives. We believe we can enhance enrollment by increasing cooperation with other regional airlines and primary flight training centers in order to produce higher levels of applicant referrals. We also encourage enrollment by developing closer integration with accredited higher education institutions offering two- and four-year degrees. Additionally, we seek to attract prospective First Officer candidates from different sources by offering training services to other regional air carriers operating similar aircraft types. We also continuously seek to assist prospective candidates in obtaining tuition financing from third party sources.

Gulfstream International Airlines

Markets Served

Gulfstream serves a number of short distance, low volume routes in Florida and the Bahamas, and offers flights from Continental Airline’s Cleveland hub to five small cities in Pennsylvania, New York and West Virginia. We offer more Bahamian destinations with more scheduled daily flights than any other U.S. carrier. Further, Gulfstream is the sole provider of scheduled service on a number of our routes. Gulfstream’s current route maps are depicted below.

As of December 31, 2009, we provided non-stop service in 31 city pairs. We believe that we are the highest-frequency service provider in 26 of these 31 city pairs. We tailor our flight schedules to individual market demands in order to optimize both profitability and the number of connecting passengers to and from our code share partners. In 2009, our average fare was $144 and our average flight length was 216 miles.

All of our flights are marketed as Continental. In addition, certain flights are also marketed through our other code share partners. We estimate that over 65% of our passengers are derived from local “point to point” traffic within Florida and the Bahamas. The balance of our passengers are derived from connecting traffic from our code-share partners and other carriers destined primarily for the Bahamas. Continental is our largest connecting partner, with 24% of our passengers connecting to and from Continental flights.

Gulfstream currently leases an average of one Boeing 737-400 daily round trip under charter agreements associated with our Cuba operations and two to three daily round trip flights to Andros Island under an agreement with a government subcontractor. In addition, Gulfstream operates on-demand charters for various customers throughout the year.

Code Share Agreements

Continental Code Share Agreement

Our primary alliance partner is Continental. Pursuant to an amended and restated alliance agreement with Continental dated March 14, 2006, which we refer to as the Continental code share agreement, Gulfstream displays the Continental “CO” designator code on all of our flights marketed to the public. Our customers may participate in Continental’s One Pass frequent flyer program.

Under this agreement, we pay Continental for various services, including ticketing, reservations, revenue accounting, and various levels of airport services. We also incur fees for computerized reservation system transactions and participation in Continental’s frequent flyer program.

Gulfstream receives all of the revenue generated by “local,” or non-connecting, passengers flown, and a portion of the total revenue from passengers connecting to or from Continental. Continental sets all prices for connecting markets, and Gulfstream sets prices for our local markets. Approximately 24% of our passengers are from connecting Continental flights.

The term of this agreement will continue through at least May 3, 2012, unless earlier terminated for cause. Cause is defined to include:

·	breach of any material provision of the agreement that is not cured within a 60-day period;

·	suspension or revocation of our authority to operate as an airline, either in whole or with respect to the CO-designated flights;

·	citation by any government authority for significant noncompliance with any material marketing or operation law, rule or regulation with respect to a CO-designated flight;

·	the filing of a petition in bankruptcy by or against us;

·	our failure to maintain required insurance coverage;

·	our failure to maintain any of our aircraft in an airworthy condition;

·	our failure to conduct operations in accordance with standards, rules and regulations promulgated by any government authority; or

except as otherwise agreed by us and Continental, a completion factor by us of less than 95% during any 21 day period or 50% during any three day period with respect to Continental flights operated by us (including in such calculations all flights canceled less than one week prior to the date of its scheduled operation and excluding flights not completed due to weather or ATC).

In addition, Continental may terminate the agreement immediately if there is a change of control, as defined in the agreement, of Gulfstream without Continental’s prior written consent.

Continental has not executed its right to appoint an individual to Gulfstream’s board of directors. It also has the right to observe the Company’s board meetings. Continental may also receive our audited financial statements, inspect our books, accounts and records and audit our operational procedures.

Gulfstream and Continental have agreed to indemnify each other for any damages arising out of either party’s acts or omissions related to the agreement. Specifically, Gulfstream has agreed to indemnify Continental for any losses arising from our possession and use of Continental’s tickets, boarding passes and other materials, including, but not limited, to lost or forged tickets.

With certain exceptions, we are required to obtain Continental’s consent to enter into additional airline code share agreements. We have also agreed to limit utilization of the United Airlines designator code to specific numbers of flights and between specific cities.

In addition to our long-term principal alliance with Continental, we have the following code share agreements:

United Airlines Code Share Agreement

We entered into a code share agreement with United in 1994, which has been amended several times, most recently in October of 2006. We provide code share operations with United to and from Tampa, Orlando, Fort Lauderdale, Miami, Tallahassee, Pensacola, Key West, and Freeport, and Marsh Harbor, and North Eleuthera, and Nassau, in the North Bahamas. Approximately 4% of our passengers are from connecting United flights. The agreement may be cancelled upon 180 days’ written notice, unless either party breaches the agreement, in which case it may be terminated upon shorter notice.

Revenue sharing formulas for proration of revenue are set forth in a separate prorate agreement, which is amended or replaced bi-annually. Our passengers may also participate in the United frequent flyer program.

Northwest Airlines Code Share Agreement

Gulfstream entered into a code share agreement and related prorate agreement, each dated February 11, 2000, with Northwest. On May 15th 2009 Gulfstream and Northwest executed an agreement to terminate its code-share agreement. Approximately 1% of our passengers were from connecting Northwest flights.

Copa Code Share Agreement

We entered into a code share agreement on July 1, 2005 with Copa Airlines, to permit us to use the “CM” designator code on Gulfstream’s flights from Miami to Orlando, Tampa and Key West. The agreement requires us to provide certain minimal operational standards. Copa Airlines, a Continental alliance partner, handles reservation services for passengers of CM-designated flights, as it would for all other Copa Airlines flights, through the Continental reservation system and provides check-in and ticketing services. We receive a standard prorated amount for each passenger we fly on a CM-designated flight. To date, this has not been a material source of our revenue.

Marketing

Under our code share agreement, Continental provides all reservations and related services for sales and marketing for CO-designated flights. United and Copa Airlines are responsible for reservations of connecting passengers marketed under their respective codes.

We are responsible for the scheduling of all of our flights and are also responsible for setting prices and managing revenue for our local passengers. Local passengers are passengers whose itinerary is not constructed using a single fare over multiple flight segments. Our code share partners are responsible for setting prices and managing revenue for our connecting passengers. We retain all of the revenue associated with our local passengers and a portion of the revenue associated with connecting passengers pursuant to revenue sharing agreements with our code share partners.

Flight Equipment

Our fleet currently consists of B1900D aircraft. The average age of our B1900D fleet is 15 years. The B1900D aircraft is a 19-seat, twin engine turbo prop that has a pressurized, stand-up cabin, and cruises at 300 miles per hour. It is ideal for short trips, and its lower operating costs make it much more economical than larger mid-sized aircraft for the frequent, short flights that we operate. We lease 23 B1900Ds under agreements that expire in 2010 and 2011; however, at our option, we can extend 15 of these leases. We also have the option to purchase up to 21 of these aircraft.

In December 2004, we purchased seven EMB-120 aircraft from Atlantic Southeast Airlines. In March of 2007, we purchased an additional EMB-120, which entered into revenue service in December 2007. These aircraft were operated until September and October 2008, when all eight aircraft were sold.

We believe that our B1900D aircraft fleet is well suited for the markets we serve. Our turbo-prop aircraft allow us to operate short distance sectors efficiently and achieve break-even revenues at lower levels than larger jet aircraft. This allows us to operate more flights per day and target smaller markets, which we believe provides us with a key advantage at non-hub airports. In addition, by operating only one aircraft type (since October, 2008), we are able to simplify our maintenance training, documentation, parts inventory and achieve lower overall operating costs. The B1900D aircraft are no longer being manufactured and there is a limited supply of used aircraft of this type.

Training and Aircraft Maintenance

Airframe maintenance performed on our aircraft can be divided into two general categories: line maintenance and heavy maintenance. Line maintenance consists of routine, scheduled maintenance checks, including pre-flight, daily and overnight checks, and any diagnostics and routine repairs. Heavy maintenance consists of more complex inspections and overhauls, and servicing of the aircraft. Most of our line maintenance and heavy maintenance is performed by our own highly experienced technicians at our hangar in Fort Lauderdale. Parts and supply inventories are primarily maintained in Fort Lauderdale and, in smaller amounts, at our locations in Miami, Tampa and West Palm Beach in Florida, and Dubois, Pennsylvania. Some line maintenance is also carried out at other locations in Florida by employees or third-party contractors. Maintenance checks are performed in accordance with the guidelines established by the aircraft manufacturer. These checks are based on the number of hours or calendar months flown by each individual aircraft.

We employ over approximately 140 or 24% of our total employees, as maintenance professionals, including engineers, supervisors, technicians and mechanics and their support staff, who perform airframe maintenance in accordance with maintenance programs that are established by the manufacturer and approved and certified by international aviation authorities. Every mechanic is trained in manufacturer-specified procedures and goes through our rigorous in-house training program. Each of our mechanics is licensed by the Federal Aviation Authority (“FAA”). Our safety and maintenance procedures are reviewed and periodically audited by the FAA. We have received the FAA Diamond Award, the highest level of recognition for maintenance training, for 13 consecutive years, including 2009.

We have agreements for maintaining our engines, propellers, landing gears and avionics with FAA certified third-party contractors. Our engines are maintained under a long-term agreement with a third party provider, which provides for engine maintenance under a fleet management program.

Pricing and Revenue Management

We believe effective revenue management, particularly during peak periods, contributes to our strong operating performance. We are responsible for setting prices in local markets and our code share partners are responsible for setting prices in connecting markets. We try to maximize the overall revenue of our flights by utilizing certain revenue management policies. Our revenue management systems and procedures enable us to understand markets, anticipate customer demand and respond quickly to revenue enhancement opportunities.

The number of seats offered at each fare is established through a continual process of forecasting and analysis. Generally, past booking history and seasonal trends are used to forecast anticipated demand. These historical forecasts are combined with current bookings, upcoming events, competitive pressures and other factors to establish a mix of fares designed to maximize revenue. This allows us to balance loads and capture more revenue from existing capacity.

Seasonality

Our business is subject to substantial seasonality, primarily due to leisure and holiday travel patterns, particularly in the Bahamas. Traditionally, we experience the strongest demand from February to July, and the weakest demand from August to October, during which period we typically suffer operating losses. As a result, our operating results for a quarterly period are not necessarily indicative of operating results for an entire year, and historical operating results are not necessarily indicative of future operating results. Our results of operations generally reflect this seasonality. Our operating results are also impacted by numerous other cycles and factors that are not necessarily seasonal.

Government Regulation

All interstate air carriers, including Gulfstream, are subject to regulation by the Department of Transportation (“DOT”), the FAA and other governmental agencies. Regulations promulgated by the DOT primarily relate to economic aspects of air service. The FAA requires operating, air worthiness and other certificates and certain record-keeping procedures. FAA approval is required for personnel who engage in flight, maintenance or operating activities and flight training and retraining programs. Generally, governmental agencies enforce their regulations through certifications, which are necessary for the continued operations of Gulfstream, and proceedings, which can result in civil or criminal penalties or revocation of operating authority. The FAA can also issue maintenance directives and other mandatory orders relating to, among other things, grounding of aircraft, inspection of aircraft, installation of new safety-related items and the mandatory removal and replacement of aircraft parts.

We believe Gulfstream is operating in compliance with FAA regulations and holds all necessary operating and airworthiness certificates and licenses. We incur substantial costs in maintaining current certifications and otherwise complying with the laws, rules and regulations to which Gulfstream is subject. Our flight operations, maintenance programs, record keeping and training programs are conducted under FAA-approved procedures. We do not operate at any airports where the FAA has restricted landing slots.

All air carriers are required to comply with federal laws and regulations pertaining to noise abatement and engine emissions. All air carriers are also subject to certain provisions of the Federal Communications Act of 1934, as amended, because of their extensive use of radio and other communication facilities. Gulfstream is also subject to certain other federal and state laws relating to protection of the environment, labor relations and equal employment opportunity. We believe that Gulfstream is in compliance in all material respects with these laws and regulations.

Safety and Security

We are committed to the safety and security of our passengers and employees. Since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, Gulfstream has taken many steps, both voluntarily and as mandated by governmental agencies, to increase the safety and security of our operations. Some of the safety and security measures we have taken, along with our code share partners, include: establishing a Safety and Security Committee of the Board of Directors, aircraft security and surveillance, positive bag matching procedures and enhanced passenger and baggage screening and search procedures. We are committed to complying with future safety and security requirements.

Charter Services

Gulfstream Air Charter, Inc. (“GAC”), a related company which is owned by Thomas L. Cooper, operates licensed charter flights between Miami and Havana. GAC is licensed by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury as a carrier and travel service provider for charter air transportation between designated U.S. and Cuban airports.

Pursuant to a services agreement between Gulfstream and GAC, Gulfstream provides use of its aircraft and flight crews at the option of GAC, as well as Gulfstream’s name, insurance, and service personnel, including passenger, ground handling, security, and administrative. Gulfstream also maintains the financial records for GAC. Gulfstream receives 75% of the operating profit generated by GAC’s Cuban charter operation.

In June 2006, Gulfstream began charter services under a long-term subcontract with Computer Sciences Corporation to operate daily flights between West Palm Beach and Andros Town, Bahamas. This contract provides for approximately two to three daily round trips and had an initial period of 21 months from inception, with extensions up to an additional 12 years. The latest 3-year extension was signed on April 1, 2008. The contract is structured as a fixed-fee arrangement, with adjustments for market fuel prices. It further specifies performance standards, as well as bonus payments for exceeding those standards. As part of this agreement, Gulfstream leases two B1900D aircraft from Computer Sciences Corporation to support the contract.

In preparation for this operation, Gulfstream obtained certification from the Commercial Airline Review Board of the U.S. Department of Defense (“DOD”). Having this certification could have the effect of increasing the number of opportunities for Gulfstream to provide additional charter flights to the DOD.

Gulfstream also provides on-demand passenger charter services based on aircraft availability.

The Academy

The Academy offers training programs for pilots holding commercial, multi-engine, and instrument certifications. Pilots with these ratings are qualified to fly commercial aircraft but seek to improve their marketability by accumulating additional training and flying time. The Academy enhances our student’s career prospects by providing them with the training and experience necessary to obtain pilot positions with commercial airlines.

Traditionally, pilots can work as flight instructors for up to two years to gain this additional training and flying time. The Academy offers an alternative to this traditional means of gathering additional flight experience. By enrolling in the Academy, students are able to more quickly accumulate the qualifications demanded by the commercial airlines. A number of U.S. airlines accept Academy graduates with a lower total flight time than these airlines require of other newly hired pilots, reflecting the value they place on the Academy’s training. The Academy graduates have also experienced a high success rate in completing training at airlines, which translates into cost savings for the airlines.

The principal program offered by the Academy is the First Officer Program, which is a comprehensive program designed to prepare pilots for their commercial airline careers. The program entails a “train to proficiency” concept, typically resulting in well over 500 hours of training time, including ground school, simulator time and observation flights. This first portion of the program can be completed in three months. The second portion of the program involves up to 400 hours of FAA Regulation Part 121 commercial airline flight hours as a First Officer at Gulfstream. FAA Regulation Part 121 established operating standards and is the principal operating regulation applicable to all major US airlines. Gulfstream relies on the Academy as its preferred source of pilots, and nearly all of our permanent pilots are graduates of the First Officer Program.

The Academy also provides training services to Gulfstream. While the Academy holds a FAA Part 142 certificate, enabling us to operate a flight training center on behalf of other airlines, we presently do not provide any training services to other airlines.

As of December 31, 2009 the Academy employed five full-time flight and ground instructors. The Academy’s instructors have, on average, been providing training for approximately 12 years each and have cumulatively amassed in excess of 68,000 actual flight hours. The Academy enrolled 59 and 42 students in 2008 and 2009, respectively. The Company estimates that 95% were or will be hired by airlines after graduation, including those hired by Gulfstream.

The Academy’s training facility in Fort Lauderdale has several ground school classrooms, a series of flight training devices used for procedural training and cockpit familiarization, as well as two non-motion flight simulators, one of which is for B1900D aircraft training. The Academy contracts for full-motion flight simulators at facilities in Orlando, Florida

Ground Operations

In the Bahamas, we lease ticket counters, check-in and boarding and other facilities and Gulfstream’s employees provide substantially all of the operations services.

In Key West, Florida, we lease our facilities and Gulfstream’s employees provide operations services. At all other Florida airports, Gulfstream contracts out all or a portion of our ground operations. From time to time, Gulfstream reviews these arrangements and evaluates the most economical operations structure.

In the markets we serve from Continental’s Cleveland hub, we lease ticket counters, check-in and boarding and other facilities, and Gulfstream’s employees provide substantially all of the operations services. We also lease gate and ramp space in Dubois and Franklin, Pennsylvania, as well as a 20,000 square foot hangar in Dubois.

Insurance

We maintain insurance policies that we believe are of types customary in the industry and in amounts we believe are adequate to protect against material loss. These policies principally provide coverage for public liability, passenger liability, baggage and cargo liability, property damage, including coverage for loss or damage to our flight equipment, and workers’ compensation insurance. We cannot assure, however, that the amount of insurance we carry will be sufficient to protect us from a material loss.

Environmental Matters

We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to environmental protection matters. These laws and regulations govern such matters as environmental reporting, storage and disposal of materials and chemicals and aircraft noise. We are, and expect in the future to be, involved in environmental matters and conditions at, or related to, our properties, but we do not expect the resolution of any such matters to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations. We are not currently subject to any material environmental cleanup orders or actions imposed by regulatory authorities. We are not aware of any active material environmental investigations related to our assets or properties.

Raw Materials and Energy

Fuel costs are a major component of our operating expenses. We contract with World Fuel Services to provide approximately half of our fuel, principally for international destinations. Most of our domestic fuel consumption is provided by Continental. The following chart summarizes our fuel consumption and costs:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2008			2009
Gallons consumed, in thousands		8,479			6,182
Total cost, in thousands (1)	$	28,452		$	12,375
Average price per gallon (2)	$	3.36		$	2.00
Percent of airline revenue (3)		29.6	%		16.3	%

(1) Total cost excludes into-plane service fees.

(2) Average price per gallon excludes into-plane service fees.

(3) Includes into-plane service fees.

Fuel costs are extremely volatile, as they are subject to many global economic and geopolitical factors that we can neither control nor accurately predict. Significant increases in fuel costs would have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

We purchase bonded fuel for our international flights on a purchase-order basis from World Fuel Services, which are exempt from federal excise taxes. Therefore, our fuel costs may not be directly comparable to costs incurred by other airlines. Gulfstream has, from time to time, implemented limited fuel cost management programs in the form of pre-ordering of specific quantities of fuel at specific locations at then-market rates. These cost management programs have not had a material impact on our financial results.

In the past, we have not experienced difficulties with fuel availability and we currently expect to be able to obtain fuel at prevailing market prices in quantities sufficient to meet our future needs. Pursuant to our contract flying arrangements with our code share partners, we bear the economic risk of fuel price fluctuations.

Gulfstream was a party to derivative instruments for the purpose of hedging the risks of increases in jet fuel prices through February 2009 covering approximately 20% of its estimated fuel usage. These fuel hedge contracts were established effective September 1, 2008 as a requirement of a financing completed at that time.

Gulfstream recognized a loss on settled hedges of $337,000 for 2009. We are not a party to any derivative or other arrangements designed to hedge against or manage the risk of an increase in fuel prices subsequent to February 2009.

Trademarks and Trade Names

Our flights are operated under the names of our code share partners, including Continental, United Airlines, and Copa Airlines. Because we do not operate scheduled flights under our trade names, we have not registered any Airline trademarks or trade names.

Employee and Labor Relations

As of December 31, 2009, we had 604 full time employees, of which 592 were employed by Gulfstream and 12 were employed by the Academy. Of the 592 employees of Gulfstream, 139 are union employees.

As of December 31, 2009, Gulfstream employed the following:

Classification
Pilots and First Officers			139
Station personnel			220
Maintenance personnel			142
Administrative and sales personnel			37
Management			8
Other flight operations			46
Total employees			592

Gulfstream’s tenured pilots are represented under a collective bargaining agreement with the Teamsters Union. A new agreement was ratified by the members in June 2006 and continued through June 2009. The Company is currently negotiating the collective bargaining agreement renewal with the Teamsters Union. Currently, no other employees are represented by unions. We have never experienced a work stoppage and no labor disputes, strikes or labor disturbances are currently pending or threatened against us. We believe we have good relations with our union employees at each of our facilities. During 2009, we reduced the number of Pilots and First Officers by approximately 30 employees as a result of declining demand and the 2008 sale of our eight Embraer aircraft.

As of December 31, 2009, the Academy employed 7 full-time administrative employees and 4 full-time flight and ground instructors. None of our Academy employees are represented by labor unions.

ITEM 1A. Risk FACTORS.

An investment in our common stock is risky. You should carefully consider the following risks, as well as the other information contained in this Form 10-K, before investing. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, business prospects, financial condition, cash flow and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In this case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you might lose part or all of your investment. We may amend or supplement the risk factors described below from time to time by other reports we file with the SEC in the future.

Risks Related To Our Industry

If the global economic downturn continues or worsens, our revenues and profitability could decline further.

Consumer demand for our products and services is closely linked to the performance of the general economy and is sensitive to business and personal discretionary spending levels. Declines in consumer demand due to adverse general economic conditions, risks affecting or reducing travel patterns, lower consumer confidence or adverse political conditions can lower our revenues and profitability. Our business is also linked to cycles in the general economy and consumer discretionary spending. As a result, changes in consumer demand and general business cycles can subject and have subjected our revenues to significant volatility.

Accordingly, the current global economic downturn has led to a significant decline in demand for our services, which has lowered our revenues and negatively affected our profitability. For the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year ended December 31, 2008, our total revenues decreased by $18.0 million.

We anticipate that recovery of demand for our services will lag an improvement in economic conditions. We cannot predict how severe or prolonged the global economic downturn will be. Furthermore, current global economic conditions have significantly impacted consumer confidence and behavior and, as a result, historical marketing information that we have collected may be less effective as a means of predicting future demand and operating results. We cannot assure you that we will be able to increase our revenues at the same rate at which they have recently declined, even after the current downturn ends. An extended period of economic weakness would likely have a further adverse impact on our revenues, and financial position, and we my be unable to fund continued operations or meet our financial obligations.

The airline industry is unpredictable.

The airline industry has experienced tremendous challenges in recent years and will likely remain volatile for the foreseeable future. Among other factors, the financial challenges faced by major carriers, including Delta Airlines, United Airlines and Northwest Airlines, and increased hostilities in the Middle East and other regions have significantly affected, and are likely to continue to affect, the U.S. airline industry. These conditions have resulted in declines and shifts in passenger demand, increased insurance costs, volatile fuel prices, increased government regulations and tightened credit markets, all of which have affected, and will continue to affect, the operations and financial condition of participants in the industry, including us, major carriers (including our code share partners), competitors and aircraft manufacturers. These industry developments raise substantial risks and uncertainties which will affect us, major carriers (including our code share partners), competitors and aircraft manufacturers in ways that we currently are unable to predict.

The airline industry is subject to the impact of terrorist activities or warnings.

The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and their aftermath negatively impacted the airline industry in general, including our operations. In particular, the primary effects experienced by the airline industry included a substantial loss of passenger traffic and revenue. While airline passenger traffic and revenue have recovered since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, additional terrorist attacks could have a similar or even more pronounced effect. Even if additional terrorist attacks are not launched against the airline industry, there will be lasting consequences of the September 11, 2001 attacks, including increased security and insurance costs, increased concerns about future terrorist attacks, increased government regulation and airport delays due to heightened security. Additional terrorist attacks or warnings of such attacks, and increased hostilities or prolonged military involvement in the Middle East or other regions, could negatively impact the airline industry, and result in decreased passenger traffic and yields, increased flight delays or cancellations associated with new government mandates, as well as increased security, fuel and other costs. There can be no assurance that these events will not harm the airline industry generally or our operations or financial condition in particular.

Our operations may be adversely impacted by increased security measures mandated by regulatory authorities.

Because of significantly higher security and other costs incurred by airports since September 11, 2001, many airports significantly increased their rates and charges to air carriers, including us, and may do so again in the future. On November 19, 2001, the U.S. Congress passed, and the President signed into law, the Aviation and Transportation Security Act, also referred to as the Aviation Security Act. This law federalized substantially all aspects of civil aviation security and created the Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”) to which the security responsibilities previously held by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) were transitioned. The TSA is an agency of the Department of Homeland Security. The Department of Homeland Security and the TSA and other agencies within the Department of Homeland Security have implemented numerous security measures, including the passing of the Aviation Security Act, that affect airline operations and costs, and are likely to implement additional measures in the future. The Department of Homeland Security has announced greater use of passenger data for evaluating security measures to be taken with respect to individual passengers, expanded use of federal air marshals on flights (thus displacing revenue passengers), investigating a requirement to install aircraft security systems (such as active devices on commercial aircraft as countermeasures against portable surface to air missiles) and expanded cargo and baggage screening. Funding for airline and airport security required under the Aviation Security Act is provided in part by a $2.50 per segment passenger security fee for flights departing from the U.S., subject to a $10 per roundtrip cap; however, airlines are responsible for costs incurred to meet security requirements beyond those provided by the TSA. There is no assurance this fee will not be raised in the future as the TSA’s costs exceed the revenue it receives from these fees. We could also be adversely affected by any implementation of stricter security measures by the Bahamian government. Fees paid to the TSA are approximately 9 months in arrears which could adversely impact the airline due to a suspension or revocation of the airlines eligibility for licenses, permits, or privileges. We cannot provide assurance that additional security requirements or security-related fees enacted in the future will not adversely affect us financially.

The airline industry is heavily regulated.

All interstate airlines are subject to regulation by the Department of Transportation (the “DOT”), the FAA and other governmental agencies. Regulations promulgated by the DOT primarily relate to economic aspects of air service. The FAA requires operating, air worthiness and other certificates; approval of personnel who may engage in flight, maintenance or operation activities; record keeping procedures in accordance with FAA requirements; and FAA approval of flight training and retraining programs. We cannot predict whether we will be able to comply with all present and future laws, rules, regulations and certification requirements or that the cost of continued compliance will not have a material adverse effect on our operations. We incur substantial costs in maintaining our certifications and otherwise complying with the laws, rules and regulations to which we are subject. A decision by the FAA to ground, or require time-consuming inspections of, or maintenance on, all or any of our aircraft for any reason may have a material adverse effect on our operations. In addition to state and federal regulation, airports and municipalities enact rules and regulations that affect our operations. From time to time, various airports throughout the country have considered limiting the use of smaller aircraft, such as our aircraft, at such airports. The imposition of any limits on the use of our aircraft at any airport at which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our operations. Because we operate only one type of aircraft and have our operations centered at Fort Lauderdale Airport, we are particularly susceptible to any such limitations.

The FAA may change its method of collecting revenues.

The FAA funds its operations largely through a tax levied on all users of the system based on ticket sales as well as a tax on fuel. As the airline industry changes, the trust fund that provides funding for the FAA’s capital accounts and all or some portion of its operations has experienced an increase in its costs without a corresponding rise in its revenue such that in its fiscal 2004, the FAA’s costs exceeded its revenues by more than $4 billion. Further, the existing authority for the current FAA taxing system expired on September 30, 2007. After almost two years of short-term extensions and continuing resolutions, the Subcommittee on Aviation of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure is presently conducting hearings concerning the FAA. The committee is hoping to have a long-term funding law in place this year. At times during this reauthorization process, eliminating or amending the current tax system and implementing user fees have been discussed that could cause us to incur potentially significant additional expenses. There can be no assurance that the final version of the FAA reauthorization bill would exempt small commercial aircraft such as those operated by Gulfstream from these new charges. If such a user fee or tax rate increase is implemented, we may not be able to pass this increased expense on to our customers. Such an expense could have a material adverse impact on our ability to conduct business.

A Senate draft version of the FAA Reauthorization Bill has proposed a $25 per-flight fee be charged on all flights, regardless of aircraft size. The recently passed House version of the Bill does not include such a fee.

The airline industry is characterized by low profit margins and high fixed costs.

The airline industry is characterized generally by low profit margins and high fixed costs, primarily for personnel, debt service and rent. The expenses of an aircraft flight do not vary significantly with the number of passengers carried and, as a result, a relatively small change in the number of passengers or in pricing could have a disproportionate effect on an airline’s operating and financial results. Accordingly, a minor shortfall in our expected revenue levels could harm our business.

The airline industry is highly competitive.

In general, the airline industry is highly competitive. Gulfstream not only competes with other regional airlines, some of which are owned by or operated as code share partners of major airlines, but we also face competition from low cost carriers and network airlines on many of our routes. One of our primary competitors in the Bahamas market, Bahamasair, is owned by the government of the Bahamas and receives substantial subsidies to fund operating losses. The receipt of these subsidies may reduce the airline’s requirement to take necessary actions to improve profitability, including raising prices to offset fuel costs. Gulfstream also competes with alternative forms of transportation, such as charter aircraft, automobiles, commercial and private boats and trains.

Barriers to entry in most of Gulfstream’s markets are limited, and some of its competitors are larger and have significantly greater financial and other resources. Moreover, federal deregulation of the industry allows competitors to rapidly enter markets and to quickly discount and restructure fares. The airline industry is particularly susceptible to price discounting because airlines incur only nominal costs to provide service to passengers occupying otherwise unsold seats.

Risks Related To Our Business

We have substantial fixed obligations.

As of December 31, 2009, we had $6.3 million of long-term debt and related warrant liabilities. In addition, we have lease payments of approximately $5.7 million per year on our fleet of 23 B1900D aircraft, as well as restructured creditor obligations of $4.2 million for the return of engines borrowed from the lessor, and other matters, payable over the next several years.

On February 11, 2010, the Company received a notice of default (the “Default Notice”) from Raytheon Aircraft Credit Corporation (“RACC”), the Company’s principal aircraft lessor, pursuant to which RACC notified the Company that the Company is in default of the payment of certain obligations under Airliner Operating Lease Agreements, each dated August 7, 2003, and amended on August 2, 2005, and March 15, 2006 (the “Lease Agreements”), by and between the Company and RACC, pursuant to which the Company currently leases from RACC twenty-one (21) Beech 1900D Airliners. The default resulted as a result of the Company’s failure to make its scheduled lease payments for the month of February. Accordingly, RACC demanded that the Company make such payments on or before February 19, 2010. The failure to make such payment would have given RACC the right to terminate the Lease Agreements, thereby prohibiting the Company from using such airplanes. Also pursuant to the Default Notice, RACC claimed that the Company is in default in make certain other payments under a separate agreement dated as of December 19, 2008 by and the Company and RACC (the “December Agreement”), which defaults are also considered to be defaults under the Lease Agreements. RACC indicated in the Default Notice that if the Company made the required payments under the Lease Agreements by February 19, 2010, it is prepared to discuss the manner in which the Company can cure or otherwise address the December Agreement defaults.

On February 19, 2010, the Company made the required payment to RACC which allowed it to continue operating the airplanes covered by the Lease Agreements. In addition, on February 19, 2010, RACC advised the Company that it would forebear from exercising any of its rights under the December Agreement or the Lease Agreements, provided, that the Company remains current in payment of future lease payments and provides RACC over the next two months with a mutually acceptable debt and financial restructuring plan that provides for a feasible basis to enable the Company to continue to meet its ongoing financial obligations under the Lease Agreement and commence to repay amounts due under the December Agreement. Although the Company believes that it will be able to establish a plan that is acceptable to RACC, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to do so, or will not otherwise default in future payments under the Lease Agreements.

Under the terms of Forbearance Agreement, Shelter Island agreed to forbear from exercising its rights and remedies under the Shelter Island Agreement until the occurrence of (a) the failure by the Company to comply with the terms, covenants and agreements of the Forbearance Agreement; and (b) the occurrence of any event of default under the Debenture or the Shelter Island Purchase Agreement (collectively, a “Termination Event”). One of the covenants to be performed by the Company under the Forbearance Agreement is the obligation of the Company to raise an additional $1.5 million of debt or equity financing by March 26, 2010, subsequently changed to March 31, 2010, or otherwise satisfy Shelter Island that the Company has adequate liquidity and working capital. Shelter Island confirmed on March 31, 2010 that the Company complied with this covenant based primarily on the first closing under a Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.

Pursuant to the Forbearance Agreement the parties amended the Debenture, as follows (i) the Company shall pay interest on the outstanding principal amount monthly in cash, commencing March 31, 2010; (ii) the Company shall pay monthly installments on the outstanding principal amount commencing April 30, 2010 and on the last trading day of each month thereafter until the August 31, 2011 maturity date of the Debenture; and (iii) the Company may prepay all or any portion of the outstanding principal amount of the Debenture together with a premium equal to 5% of outstanding principal amount being prepaid; provided that, if such prepayment is made in 2011, there shall be no premium applicable. The Company, each of its subsidiaries and Shelter Island also entered into an Omnibus Amendment to the Guaranty Agreements pursuant to which, without limitation, the parties agreed to amend the existing guarantees to include the repayment of the Shelter Island Note (see below).

Shelter Island currently holds a first priority lien and security interest on all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries. Under the terms of the Intercreditor Agreement, Shelter Island agreed to subordinate its first priority lien on the accounts receivable of the Company and its subsidiaries and the proceeds thereof, to the lien granted to the Investors under the Security Agreement with TBI to the extent of the deferred principal and accrued interest under the Notes. Shelter Island retained its first priority security interest in all of the other assets and properties of the Company and its subsidiaries.

As consideration for its financial accommodations, the Company paid Shelter Island an additional $250,000 as a forbearance fee, by delivering a $250,000 promissory note (the “Shelter Island Note”) due on the earlier of (i) August 31, 2011, and (ii) the date the Debenture is permitted or required to be paid in accordance with its terms. The Shelter Island Note accrues interest at a rate of 9% per annum and is payable in cash on a monthly basis beginning on February 26, 2011.

The Shelter Island Agreement contains Events of Default, which if not waived by the lender, would entitle the lender to accelerate the due date of the Senior Debenture. See Note 20 “Subsequent Events”. The company anticipates not achieving the “minimum quarterly EBITDA” Events of Default and therefore at December 31, 2009, the Company classified all future debenture payments as a short term balance sheet liability.

Although the Company believes that its revenues and liquidity will improve, the Company is also actively seeking short-term debt financing to meet its near-term liquidity requirements and to allow sufficient time to increase its equity capital base to support long-term growth opportunities. The Company has received non-binding proposals for additional debt financing which it is seeking to consummate. In addition, the Company has engaged an investment banking firm to assist the Company in connection with equity financing efforts.

These near-term financing transactions and payment deferrals are essential due to our current liquidity level and several additional factors, including a seasonal business slowdown that is typical in September and October, the ongoing risk posed by a relatively weak economy, the potential for continued volatility in the price of jet fuel, a negotiated settlement of the civil penalty proposed by the Federal Aviation Administration, and scheduled repayments of debt and restructured creditor obligations over the next two years.

We can make no assurance that our near-term efforts to improve liquidity or to obtain a longer-term growth-oriented equity financing will be completed successfully, or that alternative sources of capital will be available under terms acceptable to us, or at all. If an additional financing is not completed in the near-term, we would experience an immediate and significant liquidity shortfall, and would be unable to fund operations or meet our financial obligations.

Our debentures and warrants create additional risks and obligations.

In September 2008, we consummated a financing in which we issued debentures for $5.1 million (the “Senior Debentures”) and warrants to purchase 578,870 shares of common stock (the “Senior Warrants”) to Shelter Island Opportunity Fund, LLC. As a result of this financing, we face additional risks and uncertainties, including those relating to the floating interest rate on the Senior Debentures, the financial covenants of the Senior Debentures, the repayment of the Senior Debentures and the repurchase of the Senior Warrants.

The Senior Debentures bear interest at the higher of (i) a floating rate of prime plus 4% or (ii) a fixed rate of 11%. A significant increase in the prime rate could cause our interest expense to increase and might impair our ability to service this debt. In addition, the Senior Debentures subject the Company to certain covenants, (See Note 20 Subsequent Events) including covenants that we have (i) consolidated minimum quarterly EBITDA starting in the quarter ending December 31, 2008, (ii) six month EBITDA averages starting in the six months ending June 30, 2011, (iii) minimum monthly accounts receivable balance of $3.5 million, and (iv) minimum monthly cash balance of $750,000. If we are not able to comply with these covenants, we would be in default under the Senior Debentures and the holder could elect to accelerate our repayment obligation. On September 30, 2008, we were in violation of the covenant to maintain a minimum monthly accounts receivable balance of $3.5 million, with an accounts receivable balance on such date of $3.1 million. For the quarters ended December 31, 2008, and 2009, we were in violation of the covenant for consolidated minimum quarterly EBITDA. Shelter Island Opportunity Fund, LLC granted one-time waivers with respect to non-compliance with these financial covenants. The company anticipates not achieving the “minimum quarterly EBITDA” in future periods and therefore at December 31, 2009, the Company classified all future debenture payments as a current liability.

The Senior Debentures require monthly payments in accordance with the Forbearance Agreement of principal ranging from $25,000 to $250,000 beginning on April 30, 2010, with the remaining principal amount of $1,554,000 due upon maturity. In addition, the holder of the Senior Warrants may, at its option, require us to repurchase the common stock issued upon exercise of the warrant for $1,050,000 at any time after the earlier of the repayment in full of the Senior Debentures or September 2011, until August 2014.

Under the terms of Forbearance Agreement, Shelter Island agreed to forbear from exercising its rights and remedies under the Shelter Island Agreement until the occurrence of (a) the failure by the Company to comply with the terms, covenants and agreements of the Forbearance Agreement; and (b) the occurrence of any event of default under the Debenture or the Shelter Island Purchase Agreement (collectively, a “Termination Event”). One of the covenants to be performed by the Company under the Forbearance Agreement is the obligation of the Company to raise an additional $1.5 million of debt or equity financing by March 26, 2010, subsequently changed to March 31, 2010, otherwise satisfy Shelter Island that the Company has adequate liquidity and working capital. Shelter Island confirmated on March 31, 2010 that the Company complied with this convenant based primarily on the first closing under a Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.

As contemplated in the original warrant to purchase Common Stock issued to Shelter Island on August 31, 2008 (the “Original Warrant”), on February 26, 2010 the Company divided the Original Warrant into (a) a warrant in the form of the Original Warrant initially exercisable into 70,000 shares of Common Stock (the “Put Warrant”); and (b) a warrant in the form of the Original Warrant (the “Remaining Warrant”, and together with the Put Warrant, the "Divided Warrants") such that the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock of Company that are initially exercisable under the Divided Warrants (inclusive of the 70,000 Shares of Common Stock initially issuable under the Put Warrant) shall equal, in the aggregate, 15% of the fully-diluted shares of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately following consummation of the transactions contemplated under the Forbearance Agreement and the Purchase Agreements, after giving pro-forma effect to the conversion into Common Stock of all Company convertible securities and the exercise of all Company options and warrants, including the Warrants issued to the Investors. As a result of consummation of the above transactions with Shelter Island and the TBI Investors, the aggregate number of shares issuable upon conversion of the Divided Warrant is 914,189 shares of Company Common Stock.

The Company and Shelter Island also entered into an Amendment to the Put Option Agreement (the “Put Option Amendment”) dated as of August 31, 2008 under which, among other things, the exercise price applicable for all the put shares under the put option was reduced from $3,000,000 to $1,050,000, or $15.00 per share.

The Senior Debentures and the repurchase obligation associated with the Senior Warrants represent significant obligations for us and we may not be able to make all of the required payments. We may not have sufficient liquidity to make such payments or repurchase, or such payments or repurchase may significantly impair our liquidity.

On October 7, 2009, we entered into a Note Purchase Agreement with Gulfstream Funding II, LLC, pursuant to which we borrowed approximately $1.5 million on a subordinated basis. The interest rate on the loans is 12% per annum. The outstanding principal amount and all accrued and unpaid interest thereon are due on or prior to January 15, 2010. On January 15, 2010, the Company and the Lender agreed to enter into one or more definitive agreements to extend the maturity date of the Note and to provide for the conversion of the outstanding principal amount of the Note and all accrued and unpaid interest thereon (collectively, the “Debt”) into preferred stock of the Company at current market prices. These loans represent significant obligations for us and we may not be able to make all of the required payments. We may not have sufficient liquidity to make such payments, or such payments may significantly impair our liquidity.

We would be adversely affected by the loss of key personnel.

Our success is dependent upon the continued services of our management team. Our executives have substantial experience and expertise in our business and have made significant contributions to our growth and success. The loss of one of our executives or any other key employees (including the senior management team of the Airline and the Academy) could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. We do not maintain key-man life insurance on our management team.

Expansion of operations could result in operating losses.

We are actively seeking opportunities to grow by adding new routes, aircraft, alliance partners, or by acquiring other regional airlines. These opportunities will likely include operating in areas away from our current Florida base. For example, we redeployed certain assets to profitable routes by initiating service in September 2008 between Continental’s Cleveland hub and five smaller cities in Pennsylvania, New York and West Virginia in conjunction with Essential Air Service routes awarded by the Department of Transportation. Similar material increases in the scope or scale of our operations could lead to integration difficulties, which could result in short and/or long-term operating losses.

If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud and, as a result, our business could be harmed and current and potential stockholders could lose confidence in us, which could cause our stock price to fall.

We are required to perform the system and process evaluation and testing (and any necessary remediation) required to comply with the management certification requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Auditor attestation requirements of management’s assessment will first apply to us for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2010. As a result, we expect to incur substantial additional expenses and diversion of management’s time. We cannot be certain as to the timing of completion of our evaluation, testing and remediation actions or their effect on our operations since there is limited precedent available by which to measure compliance adequacy. If we are not able to implement the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud and might be subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities such as the SEC or the NYSE Amex. Any such action could harm our business or investors’ confidence in us, and could cause our stock price to fall.

Risks Related To Gulfstream

Gulfstream is dependent on our code share relationships.

Gulfstream depends on relationships created by code share agreements with Continental, and United for a significant portion of our revenues. Additionally, virtually all of our “local,” or non-connecting, traffic is booked through Continental’s reservation system. Any material modification to, or termination of, our code share agreements with any of these partners could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and the results of operations. Each of the code share agreements contains a number of grounds for termination by our partners, including failure to meet specified performance levels. Further, these agreements limit our ability to enter into code share agreements with other airlines.

Gulfstream’s code share partners may expand their direct operation of regional jets, thus limiting the expansion of our relationships with them. A decision by any of Gulfstream’s code share partners to phase out Gulfstream’s contract-based code share relationships or enter into similar agreements with one or more of Gulfstream’s competitors could have a material adverse effect on Gulfstream’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

Also, our code share partners may be restricted in increasing the level of business that they conduct with Gulfstream, thereby limiting our growth. Union scope clauses at major airlines may limit or prohibit certain types of code share operations, including those by Gulfstream.

Gulfstream is dependent on the financial strength of our code share partners.

Gulfstream is directly affected by the financial and operating strength of its code share partners. In the event of a decrease in the financial or operational strength of any of the code share partners, such partner may be unable to make the payments due to Gulfstream under the code share agreement. It is possible that if any of the code share partners file for bankruptcy, Gulfstream’s code share agreement with such partner may not be assumed in bankruptcy and could be modified or terminated. United Airlines, has recently emerged from Chapter 11 reorganization. There was no impact to the code share agreement as a result of this reorganization.

We operate our code share relationships as revenue-sharing arrangements.

Under the revenue sharing, or pro rate, arrangements that we have in place with our code share partners, we bear substantially all costs associated with our flights. Because we are responsible for such costs, factors such as rising fuel costs, increases in operating expenses and decreases in ticket prices or passenger loads could cause our profits to decrease and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

The availability of additional and/or replacement code share partners is limited and airline strategic consolidations could have an impact on operations in ways yet to be determined.

The airline industry has undergone substantial consolidation, including the recent merger of Delta Airlines and Northwest, and it may in the future undergo additional consolidation. Other developments include domestic and international code share alliances between major carriers, such as the “SkyTeam Alliance,” that currently includes Delta Airlines, Continental and Northwest, among others, and the “Star Alliance,” that currently includes United Airlines and US Airways, among others, and which Continental joined effective in October 2009. Any additional consolidation or significant alliance activity within the airline industry could limit the number of potential partners with whom Gulfstream could enter into code share relationships and materially adversely affect our relationship with our current code share partners.

There is no assurance that our relationship with our code share partners would survive in the event that any such code share partner merges with another airline.

Similarly, the bankruptcy or reorganization of one or more of our competitors may result in rapid changes to the identity of our competitors in particular markets, a substantial reduction in the operating costs of our competitors or the entry of new competitors into some or all of the markets we serve. We are unable to predict exactly what effect, if any, changes in the strategic landscape might have on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

There are constraints on our ability to establish new operations to provide airline service to major airlines other than our code share partners.

Our code share agreement with Continental requires that we seek their consent prior to establishing new code share agreements, subject to limited exceptions, as well as prior to acquiring another regional carrier. In the absence of such consent, we would have to establish a new operating subsidiary, separate from Gulfstream, which would require a substantial expenditure of management time and Company resources.

Fluctuations in fuel costs could adversely affect our operating expenses and results.

Aircraft fuel consumes a significant portion of our airline revenue (29.6% for 2008 and 16.3% for 2009). The price of aircraft fuel is unpredictable and has increased significantly in recent periods based on events outside of our control, including geopolitical developments, regional production patterns, environmental concerns and financial speculation. Because of the effect of these events on the price and availability of aircraft fuel, the cost and future availability of fuel cannot be predicted with any degree of certainty. We cannot assure you increases in the price of fuel can be offset by higher revenue. We carry limited fuel inventory and we rely heavily on our fuel suppliers. We cannot assure you we will always have access to adequate supplies of fuel in the event of shortages or other disruptions in the fuel supply. Price escalations or reductions in the supply of aircraft fuel will increase our operating expenses and could cause our operating results and net income to decline. Additionally, price escalations or reductions in the supply of aircraft fuel could result in the curtailment of our service. Some of our competitors may be better positioned to obtain fuel in the event of a shortage.

Our business is subject to substantial seasonal and cyclical volatility.

Gulfstream’s business is subject to substantial seasonality, primarily due to leisure and holiday travel patterns, particularly in the Bahamas. Traditionally, we experience the strongest demand from February to July, and the weakest demand from August to October, during which period we typically suffer operating losses. As a result, our operating results for a quarterly period are not necessarily indicative of operating results for an entire year, and historical operating results are not necessarily indicative of future operating results. Our results of operations generally reflect this seasonality. Our operating results are also impacted by numerous other cycles and factors that are not necessarily seasonal. These factors include the extent and nature of fare changes and competition from other airlines, changing levels of operations, national and international events, fuel prices and general economic conditions, including inflation. Because a substantial portion of both personal and business airline travel is discretionary, the industry tends to experience adverse financial results in general economic downturns.

Any inability to acquire and maintain additional compatible aircraft or engines would increase our operating costs and could harm our profitability.

Our fleet currently consists of 23 B1900D turboprop aircraft, each equipped with two engines. Although our management believes there is an adequate supply of such aircraft and engines available at reasonable prices and terms to meet our current needs, we are unable to predict how long these conditions will continue. Any increase in demand for these aircraft or engines could restrict our ability to obtain additional aircraft, engines and spare parts. Because the aircraft we operate are not in active production, we may be unable to obtain additional suitable aircraft, engines or spare parts on satisfactory terms or at the time needed for our operations or for the implementation of our growth plan. Further, as fuel costs increase or remain at elevated levels, the demand for highly fuel-efficient turboprop aircraft may also increase. This increase in demand could cause a shortage in the supply of reasonably priced turboprop aircraft. Such a decrease could adversely affect our ability to expand our fleet or to replace outdated aircraft, which in turn could hinder our growth or reduce our revenues.

Maintenance expenses for Gulfstream’s fleet could increase.

Gulfstream’s fleet consists of aircraft that were delivered from 1994 to 1996. As the age of our aircraft increases, additional resources may be required to sustain their reliability levels. There can be no assurance that such additional resources will not be material.

Any inability to extend the lease terms of our existing aircraft or obtain financing for additional aircraft could adversely affect our operations.

We finance our aircraft through operating lease financing. Most of our existing fleet of B1900Ds is leased from the manufacturer pursuant to lease agreements that expires in 2010. We have the option to extend the leases for up to 15 aircraft from six to 24 months after the expiration period; however, there can be no assurance that this lease agreement can be extended further on reasonable terms. If we are unable to extend these leases, we also have the option to purchase up to 21 of these aircraft; however, we may not be able to secure financing on acceptable terms, if at all. Further, the B1900D is not currently produced by their manufacturers and there is currently a limited supply of these aircraft. If we are unable to obtain replacement aircraft on economically reasonable terms, our business could be materially adversely affected.

The airline industry has been subject to a number of strikes which could adversely affect our business.

The airline industry has been negatively impacted by a number of labor strikes. Any new collective bargaining agreement entered into by other regional carriers may result in higher industry wages and add increased pressure on Gulfstream to increase the wages and benefits of our employees. Furthermore, since each of Gulfstream’s code share partners is a significant source of revenue, any labor disruption or labor strike by the employees of any one of Gulfstream’s code share partners could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Competitors or new market entrants may introduce smaller aircraft or direct hub flights, which could reduce our competitive advantage.

We operate relatively small aircraft on short flight routes, which enables us to maintain a low cost structure, giving us a competitive advantage over other airlines. If new market entrants or existing competitors were to introduce smaller aircraft into the marketplace, their costs may be lower than ours, allowing them to gain a competitive advantage. In addition, competitors could introduce new direct flights from their hubs to our key cities which could reduce the competitiveness of our Florida connecting points.

Gulfstream flies and depends upon only one aircraft type, and would be adversely affected if the FAA were to ground our fleet.

Gulfstream’s fleet consists of 23 B1900D turboprop aircraft. The FAA requires operating, air worthiness and other certificates; approval of personnel who may engage in flight, maintenance or operation activities; record keeping procedures in accordance with FAA requirements; and FAA approval of flight training and retraining programs. We cannot predict whether we will be able to comply with all present and future laws, rules, regulations and certification requirements or that the cost of continued compliance will not have a material adverse effect on our operations. We incur substantial costs in maintaining our current certifications and otherwise complying with the laws, rules and regulations to which we are subject. A decision by the FAA to ground or require additional time-consuming inspections of or maintenance on the B1900D aircraft for any reason may have a material adverse effect on the operations of Gulfstream.

Gulfstream is at risk of losses and adverse publicity stemming from any accident involving our aircraft.

While Gulfstream has never had a fatal crash over our history, it is possible that one or more of our aircraft may crash or be involved in an accident in the future, causing death or injury to individual air travelers and our employees and destroying the aircraft. An accident or incident involving one of Gulfstream’s aircraft could involve significant potential claims of injured passengers and others, as well as repair or replacement of a damaged aircraft and our consequential temporary or permanent loss of service. In the event of an accident, our liability insurance may not be adequate to offset the exposure to potential claims and we may be forced to bear substantial losses from the accident. Substantial claims resulting from an accident in excess of related insurance coverage would harm our operational and financial results. Moreover, any aircraft accident or incident, even if fully insured, could cause a public perception that Gulfstream’s operations are less safe or reliable than other airlines, which could result in a material reduction in passenger revenues.

If Gulfstream is forced to relocate our Fort Lauderdale maintenance base, we may not be able to operate as successfully.

The lease for Gulfstream’s principal maintenance facility, located at Hollywood-Fort Lauderdale International Airport (FLL), expires at the end of May 2010. We are presently in negotiations with Broward County for a lease at a nearby existing site at FLL. Broward County has been considering for some time an improvement to FLL that will eventually result in a teardown of Gulfstream’s maintenance hangar and require Gulfstream to seek an alternate location for a successor maintenance hangar on the airfield. If Gulfstream is forced to relocate its Fort Lauderdale maintenance operations, it may be prohibitively expensive to relocate and/or construct a maintenance hangar. Gulfstream may not be able to operate as efficiently or successfully from any other location. In addition, it is possible that Gulfstream would be unable to secure a suitable alternative location for our maintenance hangar. Were this to occur, we may be forced to outsource our airplane maintenance for a period of time, which would substantially increase our maintenance costs and cause us significant operational disruptions.

Hurricanes and other adverse weather conditions could adversely affect Gulfstream’s business.

Our routes in Florida and the Bahamas are particularly susceptible to the impact of hurricanes. In the event that a hurricane threatened one of our departure locations, we may be forced to cancel flights and/or relocate our fleet, either of which would cause us to lose revenues. Related storm damage could also affect telecommunications capability, causing interruptions to our operations. A hurricane could cause markets such as the Florida Keys and the Bahamas to sustain severe damage to their tourist destinations and thus cause a longer-term decrease in the number of persons traveling on our routes.

Additionally, during periods of fog, ice, low temperatures, hurricanes, storms or other adverse weather conditions, flights may be cancelled or significantly delayed. A significant interruption or disruption in service due to adverse weather or otherwise, could result in the cancellation or delay of a significant portion of Gulfstream’s flights and, as a result, could have a severe impact on our business, operations and financial performance.

Gulfstream may experience labor disruptions or an increase in labor costs.

All of Gulfstream’s permanent pilots are represented by International Brotherhood of Teamsters Airline Division Local 747, commonly known as the Teamsters. Our collective bargaining agreement with our pilots became subject to amendment in July 2009 and negotiations are currently in process. Although we have never had a work interruption or stoppage and we believe our relations with our union and non-union employees are generally good, Gulfstream is subject to risks of work interruption or stoppage and/or may incur additional administrative expenses associated with union representation of our employees. Any sustained work stoppages could adversely affect Gulfstream’s ability to fulfill our obligations under our code share agreements and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Additionally, labor costs constitute a significant percentage of our total operating costs. Our labor costs constitute approximately 27% of our 2009 total operating costs. Any new collective bargaining agreements entered into by other airlines may also result in higher industry wages and increased pressure on us to increase the wages and benefits of our employees. Future agreements with our employees’ unions may be on terms that are not economically as attractive as our current agreements nor comparable to agreements entered into by our competitors. Any future agreements may increase our labor costs or otherwise adversely affect us. Additionally, we cannot assure you that the compensation rates that we have assumed will correctly reflect the market for our non-union employees, or that there will not be future unionization of our currently nonunionized groups, which could adversely affect our costs.

Our business is heavily dependent on the Bahamas markets and a reduction in demand for air travel to this market would harm our business.

Almost half of our scheduled flights have the Bahamas as either their destination or origin and our revenue is linked primarily to the number of tourists and other passengers traveling to and from the Bahamas. Bahamian tourism levels are affected by, among other things, the political and economic climate in the Bahamas’ main tourism markets, the availability of hotel accommodations, promotional spending by competing destinations, the popularity of the Bahamas as a tourist destination relative to other vacation options, and other global factors, including natural disasters or negative publicity due to safety and security. No assurance can be given that the level of passenger traffic to the Bahamas will not decline in the future. A decline in the level of Bahamas passenger traffic could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

The current regulation of travel to Cuba is subject to political conditions and a change in the current restrictions could impair our ability to provide flights or minimize our competitive advantage.

Pursuant to a services agreement that we have entered into with GAC, we may provide the use of our aircraft, flight crews and other services to GAC for its operation of charter flights to Cuba, in exchange for which we receive 75% of the operating profit generated by such charter flights. GAC’s flights to Cuba depend on political conditions prevailing from time to time in Cuba and the United States. Currently, GAC is one of a limited number of operators who provide flights from the United States to Cuba. If relations between the United States and Cuba worsen, these flights may be prohibited entirely and we may lose significant revenues due to GAC’s inability to operate these flights. Conversely, if relations between the United States and Cuba significantly improve, demand for access to Cuba could increase dramatically, causing the market for flights from the United States to Cuba to be flooded with new entrants. In either scenario, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and negatively affected.

Our business operations in Cuba are subject to a number of U.S. federal laws and regulations, including restrictions imposed by the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) as well as trade sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the Commerce Department. The FCPA is intended to prohibit bribery of foreign officials or parties and requires public companies in the United States to keep books and records that accurately and fairly reflect those companies’ transactions. OFAC and the Commerce Department administer and enforce economic and trade sanctions based on U.S. foreign policy and national security goals against targeted foreign states, organizations and individuals, including Cuba.

If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we could be exposed to claims for damages, financial penalties, reputational harm, incarceration of our employees or restrictions on our operation of flights to and from Cuba. These restrictions could increase our costs of operations, reduce our profits or cause us to forgo development opportunities that would otherwise support our growth.

Cuba’s status as a state sponsor of terrorism could impact the sustainability and growth of the Company’s flights to Cuba.

Cuba is listed as a state sponsor of terrorism by the U.S. Department of State, and as such, GAC’s flights to Cuba are subject to any restrictions that may be imposed as a result of such designation. GAC could be subjected to regulations and requirements that could increase its costs of operating flights to Cuba, restrict the number or manner of flights it operates to Cuba or prohibit such flights entirely. The Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and negatively affected by further restrictions, or prohibitions, on doing business in Cuba as a country designated as a state sponsor of terrorism.

We rely on third parties to provide us with facilities and services that are integral to our business and can be withdrawn on short notice.

We have entered into agreements with third-party contractors, including other airlines, to provide certain facilities and services required for our operations, such as certain maintenance, ground handling, baggage services and ticket counter space. We will likely need to enter into similar agreements in any new markets we decide to serve. All of these agreements are subject to termination upon short notice. The loss or expiration of these contracts, the loss of FAA certification by our outside maintenance providers or any inability to renew our contracts or negotiate contracts with other providers at comparable rates could harm our business. Our reliance upon others to provide essential services on our behalf also gives us less control over costs and over the efficiency, timeliness and quality of contract services.

Aviation insurance is a critical safeguard of our financial condition and it might become difficult to obtain adequate insurance at a reasonable rate in the future.

We believe that our insurance policies are of types customary in the industry and in amounts we believe are adequate to protect us against material loss. It is possible, however, that the amount of insurance we carry will not be sufficient to protect us from material loss. Some aviation insurance could become unavailable, available only for reduced amounts of coverage, or available only at substantially higher rates, which could result in our failing to comply with the levels of insurance coverage required by our code share agreements, our other contractual agreements or applicable government regulations. Additionally, war risk coverage or other insurance might cease to be available to our vendors or might only be available for reduced amounts of coverage.

Adverse litigation judgments or settlements resulting from legal proceedings in which we may be involved in the normal course of our business could reduce our profits or limit our ability to operate our business.

In the normal course of our business, we are often involved in various legal proceedings. The outcome of these proceedings cannot be predicted. If any of these proceedings were to be determined adversely to us or a settlement involving a payment of a material sum of money were to occur, there could be a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, we could become the subject of future claims by third parties, our employees, our investors or regulators. Any significant adverse litigation judgments or settlements would reduce our profits and could limit our ability to operate our business.

Risks Related To the Academy

A decrease in demand for regional airline pilots could adversely impact the Academy’s ability to attract and retain students.

We believe that the employment of our graduates is essential to our ability to attract and retain students. In the event that regional airline industry demand for pilots decreases significantly, it would have a detrimental impact on the ability of our graduates to gain employment, which could have an adverse effect on enrollment.

The value of the Academy could be diminished if other airlines lower their required minimum flight hours.

Academy students are pilots who hold commercial, multi-engine and instrument ratings who are qualified to operate commercial flights but who seek to enhance their marketability by logging additional training and flight hours. The Academy offers pilots the opportunity to log flight hours more quickly than the traditional time-building method of flight instructing. If the airlines who hire Academy graduates were to reduce the number of logged hours that they require new pilots to have, the value of the Academy could be diminished and the Academy could suffer decreased enrollment and a loss of revenues.

The inability to finance tuition costs could adversely affect the Academy’s enrollment.

Most of our students depend upon some form of third-party financing to finance part or all of the cost of tuition. This type of financing is only available from limited sources. The inability of prospective students to obtain third-party financing could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain students.

Workplace error by graduates of the Academy could expose us to legal action.

Many of the pilots that graduate from the Academy are ultimately employed by airlines other than Gulfstream. In the event of an accident caused by one of the graduates of the Academy, it is possible that the Academy could be named as a defendant in any lawsuit that may arise. There can be no assurance that our insurance policy will be adequate to cover the potential losses from any such claims.

Risks Related To Our Common Stock

We do not pay cash dividends on our capital stock, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the future.

We have never paid cash dividends on our capital stock and do not have current plans to do so. Instead, we will likely retain our future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will likely be your sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, and Delaware law contain provisions that could discourage a takeover.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions that might enable our management to resist a takeover. As described in “Description of Capital Stock — Anti-Takeover Provisions of Delaware Law and Charter Provisions”, these provisions may:

·	discourage, delay or prevent a change in the control of our company or a change in our management;

·	adversely affect the voting power of holders of common stock; and

·	limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.

Reports published by securities or industry analysts, including projections in those reports that exceed our actual results, could adversely affect our stock price and trading volume.

We currently expect securities research analysts, including those affiliated with our underwriters, will establish and publish their own quarterly projections for our business. These projections may vary widely from one another and may not accurately predict the results we actually achieve. Our stock price may decline if our actual results do not match securities research analysts’ projections. Similarly, if one or more of the analysts who writes reports on us downgrades our stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price could decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to publish reports on us regularly, our stock price or trading volume could decline. While we expect securities research analyst coverage, if no securities or industry analysts commence coverage of our company, the trading price for our stock and the trading volume could decline.

The issuance of a substantial number of shares of our common stock will dilute our current stockholders and may depress the market price of our common stock and make it difficult for us to raise capital.

As a result of issuing the Senior Warrants and the Junior Warrants in September 2008, we may be required to issue an additional 1,999,606 shares of our common stock, representing 31.6% of the outstanding equity as of April 14, 2010. This is in addition to the October 2009 conversion of the Junior Debentures into 578,342 shares of our common stock. Further, both the Senior and Junior Warrants include adjustment provisions that could require us to issue a greater number of shares under certain circumstances.

The shares issued upon exercise of the Senior and Junior Warrants represent a significant percentage of our presently outstanding common stock and the issuance of such shares would result in dilution to our current stockholders and could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

Potential investors could be prohibited from investing, or choose not to invest, in our common stock because we provide services to a company that operates flights to Cuba.

Cuba has been identified as a state sponsor of terrorism by the U.S. Department of State. Some potential investors, including certain pension funds or trust funds, may be prohibited from investing, or may choose not to invest, in companies that do business with or in countries designated as sponsors of terrorism. Additionally, unrestricted potential investors may choose not to invest in our common stock based solely or in part on the fact that we provide services to GAC, a company that operates flights to Cuba. The exclusion of such investors may limit the market for shares of our common stock or negatively impact the further development of an active trading market for our common stock.

Our common stock has only been publicly traded for a short period of time, and the price of our common stock could fluctuate substantially, possibly resulting in class action securities litigation.

Before our initial public offering in December 2007, there had been no public market for shares of our common stock. For the last three months, the average daily trading volume of our common stock has been approximately 11,000 shares. An active public trading market may not develop or, if developed, may not be sustained.

The stock market in general and airlines in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the underlying businesses. In addition, the airline industry recently experienced a period of significant disruption characterized by the bankruptcy, failure, collapse or sale of various financial institutions, which led to increased volatility in securities prices and a significant level of intervention from the U.S. and other governments in securities markets. These broad market and industry factors may seriously harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance.

In addition to the risks described in this section, several factors that could cause the price of our common stock in the public market to fluctuate significantly include, among others, the following:

·	quarterly variations in our operating results compared to market expectations;

·	announcements of new services or products or significant price reductions by us or our competitors;

·	size of the public float;

·	stock price performance of our competitors;

·	fluctuations in stock market prices and volumes;

·	default on our indebtedness or changes to our liquidity;

·	changes in senior management or key personnel;

·	changes in financial estimates by securities analysts;

·	negative earnings or other announcements by us or other airlines;

·	downgrades in our credit ratings or the credit ratings of our competitors;

·	issuances of capital stock; and

·	global economic, legal and regulatory factors unrelated to our performance.

Because of the low trading volume, our stock price is subject to greater volatility. Securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the overall market and in the market price of a company’s securities. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs, reduce our profits, divert our management’s attention and resources and harm our business.

We are not in compliance with NYSE Amex continued listing standards.

Our common stock is listed for trading on the NYSE Amex, which is the successor to the American Stock Exchange (the “Exchange”). The Exchange requires listed companies to meet certain continued listing standards. These standards include specified minimum stockholders equity thresholds when an issuer sustains net losses over a number of years. We have not met the threshold set forth in Section 1003(a) of the Exchange’s Company Guide because, for the 2008 fiscal year, we have stockholder’s equity of less than $2 million and losses from continuing operations and/or net losses in two out of our three most recent fiscal years. As a result, we have received a notice from the Exchange that we have not met this continued listing requirement.

The NYSE Amex staff has accepted the plan that we submitted to achieve and sustain compliance with all of the NYSE Amex’s listing requirements (the “Plan”), including a time frame for regaining compliance with Section 1003(a)(i) of the Company Guide within 18 months or by November 12, 2010 (the “Plan Period”). We will be able to continue our listing during the Plan Period, during which time we will be subject to periodic review to determine if we are making progress consistent with the Plan. If we are not in compliance with all the continued listing standards of the NYSE Amex Company Guide by November 12, 2010, or if we do not make progress consistent with the Plan during the Plan Period, we may be subject to delisting proceedings. We may appeal a Staff determination to initiate delisting proceedings.

As part of our efforts to achieve and sustain compliance with the Plan, we agreed to convert the Junior Debentures to common stock at a reduced conversion price of $1.975 per share. This was approved by our stockholders on October 20, 2009.

In the event our common stock was delisted by the Exchange, we would be in breach of a covenant of our loan and security agreement with Shelter Island Opportunity Fund, LLC, and, in the absence of a waiver, the maturity of our secured original issue discount debenture could be accelerated.

The liability of our officers and directors is limited.

Our certificate of incorporation limits the liability of directors to the maximum extent permitted by Delaware law. Delaware law provides that directors of a corporation will not be personally liable for monetary damages for breach of their fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for:

·	any breach of their duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders;

·	acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;

·	unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions; or

·	any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

This limitation of liability does not apply to liabilities arising under the federal securities laws and does not affect the availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief or rescission.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws also provide that we will indemnify our directors, officers, employees and agents for damages arising in connection with their actions in such capacities, subject to certain limitations as set forth in the bylaws.

There is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors, officers, employees or agents where indemnification will be required or permitted. We are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation or proceeding that might result in a claim for indemnification.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

We currently lease all of our facilities, including our corporate headquarters and largest space (other than hanger and ramp space) near the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport. We lease ticket counter space, gate space and operations space at various airports throughout our system, most of which are not under long-term leases.

Our principal facilities and facilities that we lease under long-term leases, and their primary uses and segments are as follows:


Location	Square Feet	Use	Segment
Fort Lauderdale, Florida	12,600	Headquarters, Operations	Gulfstream, Academy
Fort Lauderdale, Florida	3,750	Training Facility	Academy
Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, Florida	249,000	Hanger and Ramp Space	Gulfstream
Fort Lauderdale, Florida	8,000	Warehouse, Storage and Shop	Gulfstream
Miami International Airport	1,050	Cuba Operations	Gulfstream
Tampa International Airport	7,613	Gate and Ramp Space	Gulfstream
Venango Regional Airport	684	Gate and Ramp Space	Gulfstream
Dubois Regional Airport	1,133	Gate and Ramp Space	Gulfstream
Dubois Regional Airport	20,000	Hangar	Gulfstream

We believe that our principal facilities and facilities that we lease are adequate to meet our current needs. Our principal facilities and facilities that we lease are in good condition and are sufficient to conduct our operations. We do not intend to materially renovate, improve, or develop properties. We are not subject to competitive conditions for property and currently have no facility property to insure. We have no policy with respect to investments in real estate or interests in real estate and no policy with respect to investments in real estate mortgages. Further, we have no policy with respect to investments in securities of or interests in persons primarily engaged in real estate activities.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

On May 7, 2009, the Federal Aviation Administration (the “FAA”) notified the Company that it was seeking a proposed civil penalty of $1,310,000 against the Company for alleged non-compliance with respect to certain record keeping requirements, and regulatory requirements relating to the use of certain replacement parts. The Company has begun an informal conference with the FAA, which is a settlement process prescribed by statute that authorizes the FAA to accept and consider relevant information in order to compromise proposed civil penalties. We have submitted information, evidence and supporting documentation for consideration by the FAA demonstrating that certain alleged violations of the regulations did not occur, or demonstrating why the facts and circumstances in this case do not warrant the proposed civil penalty sought by the FAA. We believe that information submitted by us to the FAA through the informal conference process may result in a significant reduction in the civil penalty initially proposed in this matter, and the Company remains in discussions with the FAA over the terms of the settlement. The FAA has since indicated that, unless the mattersare settled, it could propose additional civil penalties based on additional inspections conducted by the agency in 2009 as part of its routine surveillance of air carriers. If a compromised settlement of the matters is not successful, the FAA, through a U.S Attorney, may initiate a civil action for the full amount of the proposed civil penalty as prescribed by law.

In January 2006, a former salesman of the Academy formed a business that the Company believes competes directly with the Academy for student pilots. Thereafter, the former President of the Academy resigned his position at the Academy and the Company believes he became affiliated with the alleged competing business. The Academy has initiated a lawsuit against these former employees, alleging violation of non-competition and fiduciary obligations. The defendants, including the Academy’s former President, subsequently filed a counterclaim against the Academy based upon lost earnings and breach of contract.

The Academy and the sole remaining defendant have agreed to submit to binding arbitration which is to be held no later than May 1st, 2010 pursuant to the Court’s Order Referring Case to Binding Arbitration entered on February 16, 2010.

From time to time, we are a party to litigation or other legal proceedings that we consider to be a part of the ordinary course of our business. We are not involved currently in legal proceedings that could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations. We may become involved in material legal proceedings in the future.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

Our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on October 20, 2009 in Fort Lauderdale, Florida at 11:00 a.m. local time.

There were present in person or by proxy 2,333,152 shares of our common stock, of a total of 2,959,600 shares of common stock entitled to vote as of the record date of September 8, 2009.

The number of shares voted in favor of the election of the following nominees for director is set forth opposite each nominee’s name:

Nominee		Number of Shares
Thomas A. McFall		2,310,952
David F. Hackett		2,314,818
Gary P. Arnold		2,314,743
Gary L. Fishman		2,314,952
Barry S. Lutin		2,314,943
Richard R. Schreiber		2,314,743

The following six additional proposals were presented to our shareholders and adopted:

The proposal to amend the Company's Stock Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the plan from 350,000 to 650,000 received 2,167,483 votes in favor.

The proposal to amend the Company's certificate of incorporation to authorize the issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock received 2,250,503 votes in favor.

The proposal to authorize the potential issuance of up to 1,500,000 shares of preferred stock which may be convertible into shares of common stock at a price per share not less than 75% of the greater of the market price or book value per share received 2,229,358 votes in favor.

The proposal to ratify the issuance of the junior subordinated debenture, which is convertible into common stock at a price of $3.00 per share, received 2,239,578 votes in favor.

The proposal to approve a reduction in the price at which the outstanding junior subordinated debenture is convertible into common stock from $3.00 per share to $1.98 per share received 2,225,433 votes in favor.

The proposal to appoint Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P as the Company's independent auditors for 2009 received 2,307,652 votes in favor.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Market Information

Our common stock has been traded on the NYSE Amex (formerly, the American Stock Exchange) under the symbol “GIA” since December 14, 2007. The below table sets forth the high and low closing prices of our common stock for the periods indicated and reported by the NYSE Amex. The prices set forth below represent inter-dealer quotations, without retail markup, markdown or commission and may not be reflective of actual transactions.

	High		Low
Year Ended December 31, 2009:
Fourth Quarter	$	1.80	$	1.28
Third Quarter	$	2.19	$	1.67
Second Quarter	$	4.60	$	1.66
First Quarter	$	2.66	$	1.40

Year Ended December 31, 2008:
Fourth Quarter	$	3.27	$	1.00
Third Quarter	$	3.75	$	0.75
Second Quarter	$	5.25	$	2.09
First Quarter	$	9.04	$	4.51

As of March 31, 2010, 3,795,061 shares of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, were issued and outstanding. As of March 31, 2010, there were approximately 53 stockholders of record of our common stock, although we believe that there are a significantly larger number of beneficial owners of our common stock. On April 12, 2010, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the NYSE Amex Exchange was $1.25

Dividends

We have not paid cash dividends on our capital stock and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the future. We anticipate that we will retain any earnings to support operations and to finance the growth and development of our business. Additionally, we are party to general agreements that limit our ability to pay dividends. Under our credit facilities, we and our subsidiaries are prohibited from declaring dividends without the consent of our lender. Gulfstream is permitted under its primary aircraft lease agreement to pay dividends only if its average cash position after paying the dividend would equal or exceed $4,000,000 over the prior twelve month period. In addition, in the event that Gulfstream declares a dividend, Gulfstream has an obligation under the warrant held by Continental to pay Continental cash in an amount equal to what Continental would have been entitled to had it exercised its warrant immediately prior to such dividend. Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on a number of factors, including future earnings, capital requirements, financial conditions, future prospects and other factors that the board of directors may deem relevant.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

On November 18, 2009, the Company issued 23,333 shares of common stock to Shelter Island Opportunity Fund, LLC (“Shelter Island”) as consideration for Shelter Island’s agreement to waive the Company’s non-compliance with certain minimum quarterly EBITDA and monthly cash balance covenants for September 30, 2009 as set forth in the Securities Purchase Agreement between Shelter Island and the Company. The shares represent $35,000 divided by the $1.50 closing price of the Company’s common stock on November 18, 2009.

On January 29, 2010, the Company consummated the first closing under a Unit Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with seven accredited investors (the “Investors”) pursuant to which the Company sold to the Investors units of its securities (the “Units”) consisting of (i) one share (the “Shares”) of common stock of the Company, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”); and (ii) warrants to purchase three-quarters of a share of Common Stock (the “Warrants”), at a per Unit purchase price of $1.40 for aggregate gross proceeds of $327,300 (the “Offering”). Upon completion of the first closing of the Offering, the Company sold to the Investors an aggregate of 233,786 Shares and Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 175,339 shares of Common Stock.

The Warrants expire on July 29, 2013 and are exercisable into shares of Common Stock beginning on July 29, 2010 at an exercise price equal to $3.00 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth in the Warrants.

In connection with the first closing of the Offering, the Company paid/issued the placement agent (i) cash commissions in the amount of 9% of the total purchase price received by the Company in the first closing; (ii) a non-accountable expense allowance equal to 2% of the total purchase price received by the Company in the first closing; and (iii) Warrants to purchase 18,703 shares of Common Stock, which represents 8% of the aggregate amount of Shares sold as part of the Units in the first closing.

On February 26, 2010, the Company completed a $1,000,000 debt financing pursuant to purchase agreements for senior secured notes and warrants (the “Purchase Agreements”) with accredited investors and/or qualified institutional purchasers (the “Investors”) pursuant to which the Company sold to the Investors (i) 12% Senior Secured Notes due December 31, 2010 in an aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000 (the “Notes”); and (ii) warrants, exercisable at $1.22 per share (subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments) and expiring February 28, 2015 (the “Warrants”), to purchase an aggregate of 409,827 of shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Common Stock”). The number of Warrants issued to each Investor was determined by dividing (a) 50% of the principal amount of the Notes purchased by the Investors, by (b) the Exercise Price (as defined below) of the Warrants (the “Offering”). However, if the Notes are not prepaid by the Company in full by June 30, 2010, then the shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants (the “Warrant Shares”) would represent 100% of the original $1,000,000 principal amount of the Notes divided by the Exercise Price. Accordingly, if the Notes are not paid in full by June 30, 2010, assuming no anti-dilution adjustments to the Warrant Shares or the Exercise Price, the aggregate of 409,827 Warrant Shares would increase to 819,654 Warrant Shares.

In connection with the closing of the February 26, 2010 Purchase Agreements, the Company issued to the placement agent, (i) a $50,000 Note (identical to the Investors’ Notes) and a Warrant to purchase 20,491 Warrant Shares, which represents 5% of the total principal amount of the Notes and Warrants sold in the Offering; and (ii) a separate Warrant to purchase 40,982 shares of Common Stock, which represents 10% of the number of Warrant Shares issuable to Investors under the Warrants.

Pursuant to the Forbearance Agreement the parties amended the secured original issue discount debenture due August 31, 2011 issued to Shelter Island (the “Debenture”), as follows (i) the Company shall pay interest on the outstanding principal amount monthly in cash, commencing March 31, 2010; (ii) the Company shall pay monthly installments on the outstanding principal amount commencing April 30, 2010 and on the last trading day of each month thereafter until the August 31, 2011 maturity date of the Debenture; and (iii) the Company may prepay all or any portion of the outstanding principal amount of the Debenture together with a premium equal to 5% of outstanding principal amount being prepaid; provided that, if such prepayment is made in 2011, there shall be no premium applicable. The Company, each of its subsidiaries and Shelter Island also entered into an Omnibus Amendment to the Guaranty Agreements pursuant to which, without limitation, the parties agreed to amend the existing guarantees to include the repayment of the Shelter Island Note.

In connection with the Forbearance Agreement and as contemplated in the original warrant to purchase Common Stock issued to Shelter Island on August 31, 2008 (the “Original Warrant”), on February 26, 2010 the Company divided the Original Warrant into (a) a warrant in the form of the Original Warrant initially exercisable into 70,000 shares of Common Stock (the “Put Warrant”); and (b) a warrant in the form of the Original Warrant (the “Remaining Warrant”, and together with the Put Warrant, the "Divided Warrants") such that the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock of Company that are initially exercisable under the Divided Warrants (inclusive of the 70,000 Shares of Common Stock initially issuable under the Put Warrant) shall equal, in the aggregate, 15% of the fully-diluted shares of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately following consummation of the transactions contemplated under the Forbearance Agreement and the Purchase Agreements, after giving pro-forma effect to the conversion into Common Stock of all Company convertible securities and the exercise of all Company options and warrants, including the Warrants issued to the Investors. As a result of consummation of the above transactions with Shelter Island and the TBI Investors, the aggregate number of shares issuable upon conversion of the Divided Warrant is 917,646 shares of Company Common Stock.

On March 31, 2010, the Company consummated the first closing under a Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with 17 accredited investors (the “Investors”) pursuant to which the Company sold to the Investors (i) an aggregate of 118,500 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 and stated value $10.00 per share (the “Preferred Shares”), convertible into 1,185,000 shares of common stock of the Company, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”); and (ii) 5-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 592,500 shares of Common Stock (the “Warrants”), representing 50% of the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Shares, for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,043,000 (the “Offering”). The Warrants expire on March 31, 2013 and are exercisable into shares of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to $1.75 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth in the Warrants.

Pursuant to the Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company which was filed with the State of Delaware on March 31, 2010 (the “Certificate of Designation”), each Preferred Share is convertible into 10 shares of Common Stock. In addition, the Preferred Shares pay an annual dividend at the rate of 12% per annum, payable quarterly, on the last business day of each December, March, June and September (each a “Dividend Payment Date”), payable on each Dividend Payment Date as follows: (i) 60% of each quarterly dividend (based on an annual rate of 7% per annum) shall be payable in cash, and (ii) 40% of each quarterly dividend (based on an annual rate of 5% per annum) shall be payable either in cash, or at the sole option of the Company, in additional shares of Common Stock, calculated for such purposes by dividing the amount of the quarterly dividend then payable by 100% of the market price of the Common Stock on such Dividend Payment Date. Unless previously converted into Common Stock, all Preferred Shares outstanding on the earlier to occur of (a) the date on which the average of the market prices of the Common Stock for any 20 consecutive trading days shall be $2.00 or higher, or (b) 5 years from the Preferred Shares issuance date, shall be automatically converted into Common Stock at the Conversion Price then in effect.

In addition, on March 31, 2010, 4 of the 7 purchasers of the Company’s units consisting of one share of Common Stock (the “Shares”), and warrants to purchase three-quarters of a share of Common Stock (the “Prior Warrants”) which was consummated on January 29, 2010 (the “Prior Offering”), entered into a letter agreement with the Company (the “Exchange Agreement”) pursuant to which such purchasers agreed to exchange their Shares and Prior Warrants for Preferred Shares and Warrants, under the same terms and conditions applicable to Investors in the Offering. Such purchasers also agreed that the Company shall have no further obligations or liabilities in connection with the transaction documents executed and delivered with respect to the Prior Offering, including, without limitation, the Unit Purchase Agreement, the Registration Rights Agreement and the Prior Warrant, each dated as of January 29, 2010, and each of which are terminated in any and all respects.

In connection with the first closing of the Offering, the Company paid/issued the placement agent (i) cash commissions in the amount of 9% of the total purchase price received by the Company in the first closing; (ii) a non-accountable expense allowance equal to 2% of the total purchase price received by the Company in the first closing; and (iii) Warrants to purchase 114,730 shares of Common Stock, which represents 11% of the total purchase price received by the Company in the first closing.

We believe that all of the above offerings and sales were deemed to be exempt under Rule 506 of Regulation D and Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. No advertising or general solicitation was employed in offering the securities. The offerings and sales were made to a limited number of persons, all of whom were accredited investors, business associates of the Company or executive officers of the Company, and transfer was restricted by the Company in accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. In addition to representations by the above-referenced persons, we have made independent determinations that all of the above-referenced persons were accredited or sophisticated investors, and that they were capable of analyzing the merits and risks of their investment, and that they understood the speculative nature of their investment. Furthermore, all of the above-referenced persons were provided with access to our Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

Repurchase of Equity Securities

We do not have any programs to repurchase shares of our common stock and no such repurchases were made during the quarter ended December 31, 2009.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table presents information as of December 31, 2009 with respect to compensation plans under which equity securities were authorized for issuance.

Plan category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options (a)		Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options (b)		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column(a)) (c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (1)		650,000	$	3.81		301,676

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		-0-		-0-		-0-
Total		650,000	$	3.81		301,676

(1) On May 1, 2009 and October 20, 2009, the board of directors and the Company’s shareholders, respectively, authorized the amended and restated stock incentive plan for purposes of increasing the number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the plan from 350,000 to 650,000. Other than as set forth above, we do not have any stock option, bonus, profit sharing, pension or similar plan with the exception of a tax deferred savings plan with a discretionary profit sharing component which qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

The following selected historical and pro forma financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” following this section and our financial statements and related notes included in this annual report.

The following table sets forth selected financial data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009. The selected financial data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 were derived from our audited financial statements. Our audited financial statements as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 are included below under Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The historical results are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected in any future period.

	Twelve Months Ended Dec. 31,
	2008			2009			% Change
	(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Revenue
Airline passenger revenue	$	88,527		$	59,753			-32.5%
Essential air service revenue		2,512			8,302			230.5%
Academy, charter and other revenue		14,217			19,249			35.4%
Total Revenue		105,256			87,304			-17.1%

Operating Expenses
Flight operations		12,859			15,005			16.7%
Aircraft fuel		30,350			13,918			-54.1%
Aircraft rent		5,911			6,093			3.1%
Maintenance		24,478			21,625			-11.7%
Passenger service		21,759			19,352			-11.1%
Promotion & sales		6,623			4,986			-24.7%
General and administrative		7,110			7,351			3.4%
Depreciation and amortization		2,754			1,218			-55.8%
Loss on sale of equipment		4,754			-			-100.0%
Intangible asset impairment		2,703			680			-74.8%
Operating Expenses		119,301			90,228			-24.4%

Income (loss) from operations		(14,045	)		(2,924	)		-79.2%

Non-Operating Income and (Expense)
Interest (expense)		(1,306	)		(2,330	)		78.4%
Other income (expense)		43			(265	)		-716.3%
Non-Operating Income and (Expense)		(1,263	)		(2,595	)		105.5%
Income (loss) before taxes		(15,308	)		(5,519	)		-63.9%
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(509	)		2,032			-499.2%
Net income (loss)	$	(14,799	)	$	(7,551	)		-49.0%

Earnings per Share:
Basic	$	(5.00	)	$	(2.45	)
Diluted	$	(5.00	)	$	(2.45	)

Shares used in computing net income (loss) per share:
Basic		2,957			3,076
Diluted		2,957			3,076

Operating Statistics. The following table sets forth our major operational statistics and the percentage-of-change for the years identified.

	Twelve Months Ended Dec. 31,
		2008			2009		% Change

Annual Operating Statistics :
Available seat miles (000's) (1)		227,386			165,853			-27.1	%
Revenue passenger miles (000's) (2)		127,092			89,757			-29.4	%
Revenue passengers carried		629,563			415,867			-33.9	%
Departures flown		56,598			43,114			-23.8	%
Passenger load factor (3)		55.9	%		54.1	%		-3.2	%
Average yield per revenue passenger mile (4)	$	0.70		$	0.67			-4.3	%
Revenue per available seat miles (5)	$	0.39		$	0.36			-7.5	%
Operating costs per available seat mile (6)	$	0.49		$	0.48			-3.5	%
Fuel cost per available passenger miles (9)	$	0.13		$	0.08			-37.1	%
Average passenger fare (7)	$	140.62		$	143.68			2.2	%
Average passenger trip length (miles) (8)		202			216			6.9	%
Aircraft in service (end of period)		23			23			0.0	%
Fuel cost per gallon (incl taxes)	$	3.36		$	2.00			-40.5	%

1. “Available seat miles” or “ASMs” represent the number of seats available for passengers in scheduled flights multiplied by the number of scheduled miles those seats are flown.

2. “Revenue passenger miles” or “RPMs” represent the number of miles flown by revenue passengers.

3. “Passenger load factor” represents the percentage of seats filled by revenue passengers and is calculated by dividing revenue passenger miles by available seat miles.

4. “Average yield per revenue passenger mile” represents the average passenger revenue received for each mile a revenue passenger is carried.

5. “Revenue per available seat mile” or “RASM” represents the average total operating revenue received for each available seat mile.

6. “Operating cost per available seat mile” represents operating expenses divided by available seat miles.

7. “Average passenger fare” represents passenger revenue divided by the number of revenue passengers carried.

8. “Average passenger trip length” represents revenue passenger miles divided by the number of revenue passengers carried.

9. “Fuel cost per available seat mile” represents fuel cost divided by the number of available seat miles.

The following table sets forth other major financial data:

	As of December 31,
(In thousands)	2008			2009
Working Capital	$	(8,245	)	$	(14,621	)
Property and Equipment, net		2,793			2,697
Total Assets		19,370			14,778
Long-Term Debt, net of current portion		2,850			-
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)	$	(4,665	)	$	(10,939	)

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION OR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

WE URGE YOU TO READ THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION IN CONJUNCTION WITH OUR CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO BEGINNING ON PAGE F-1. THIS DISCUSSION MAY CONTAIN FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE SUBSTANTIAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. OUR ACTUAL RESULTS, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS COULD DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AS A RESULT OF A NUMBER OF FACTORS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES DISCUSSED UNDER THE HEADING “RISK FACTORS” IN THIS FORM 10-K AND IN OUR OTHER FILINGS WITH THE SEC. IN ADDITION, SEE “CAUTIONARYSTATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS” SET FORTH IN THIS REPORT.

Overview

We operate a scheduled airline, scheduled and on-demand charter services, and a flight training academy for commercial pilots.

Our most significant market opportunity relates to the fact that we currently operate in and have targeted future expansion in unserved and underserved short haul markets, which is a growing opportunity for two principal reasons. Many smaller markets are being abandoned by major carriers, as they shift their focus increasingly to international markets and away from domestic markets and hubs. In addition, many smaller markets are also being abandoned by regional airlines, as they continue to gravitate toward larger jet aircraft in the 70-100 seat range, and away from smaller markets that utilize turboprop aircraft. As a result, we continue to seek opportunities to grow in the expanding number of smaller underserved or unserved markets that are suitable for our fleet of small-capacity aircraft.

Our most significant challenges relate to:

·	securing capital to improve liquidity, fund growth opportunities, and acquire our fleet of twenty-one (21) leased aircraft;

·	volatility in the price of aircraft fuel;

·	a weakened economic environment; and

·	securing cost-effective maintenance resources, as the average age of our aircraft fleet increases.

Current Developments

For the year ended December 31, 2009, we generated less cash flow from operations than initially projected at the beginning of the year due to lower revenue and higher fuel costs than forecasted. From October 2008 to December 31, 2009, we also repaid over $4.4 million of debt and restructured creditor obligations.

During the second-half of 2009, Gulfstream experienced significant deterioration in its revenue environment, which, combined with rising fuel costs, resulted in greater than anticipated losses and pressure on its liquidity outlook. While part of the revenue weakness was the result of recessionary economic conditions, the situation was made particularly acute by new low-fare competition in certain of our markets.

With an increasingly weakened balance sheet, Gulfstream found it necessary to attract new capital beginning in the fourth quarter of 2009. With liquidity needs becoming more urgent, in January 2010 the airline found itself in an unsustainable financial situation. As such, the Company retained Berger Singerman and Mesirow Financial Advisors to assist in its restructuring and financing activities. Although the Company believes that its revenue and liquidity will improve in future periods, the Company continued to actively seek short-term financing to meet its near-term liquidity requirements and to allow sufficient time to significantly increase its equity capital base to support long-term growth opportunities, as well as the purchase of its twenty-one (21) aircraft leased from Raytheon Aircraft Credit Corporation.

These near-term financing transactions and restructuring efforts, which are described in detail below in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition or Results of Operations, Liquidity and Capital Resources, are essential due to our current liquidity position, as well as several additional factors, including a highly seasonal business, the ongoing risk posed by a relatively weak economy, the potential for continued volatility in the price of jet fuel, proposed by the Federal Aviation Administration the necessity for funds to satisfy or compromise civil penalties, and scheduled payments of debt and restructured creditor obligations over the next two years.

We can make no assurance that our efforts to improve liquidity or to obtain longer-term growth-oriented equity financing will be completed successfully, that we will have adequate funds to satisfy or compromise the civil penalties proposed by the FAA or that alternative sources of capital will be available to us. If additional equity capital is not available in the next several months, we would likely experience a significant liquidity shortfall before the end of 2010, and would be unable to fund continued operations or meet our financial obligations.

Results of Operations

Comparative Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2009

The following table sets forth our financial results for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009:

	Twelve Months Ended December 31
	2008			2009			% Change

Revenue
Airline passenger revenue	$	88,527		$	59,753			-32.5%
Essential air service revenue		2,512			8,302			230.5%
Academy, charter and other revenue		14,217			19,249			35.4%
Total Revenue		105,256			87,304			-17.1%

Operating Expenses
Flight operations		12,859			15,005			16.7%
Aircraft fuel		30,350			13,918			-54.1%
Aircraft rent		5,911			6,093			3.1%
Maintenance		24,478			21,625			-11.7%
Passenger service		21,759			19,352			-11.1%
Promotion & sales		6,623			4,986			-24.7%
General and administrative		7,110			7,351			3.4%
Depreciation and amortization		2,754			1,218			-55.8%
Impairment charge on assets held for sale		4,754			-			-100.0%
Goodwill impairment		2,703			680
Total Operating Expenses		119,301			90,228			-24.4%

Income (loss) from operations		(14,045	)		(2,924	)		-79.2%

Non-operating Income and (Expense)
Interest expense		(1,306	)		(2,330	)		78.4%
Other income (expense)		43			(265	)		-716.3%
		(1,263	)		(2,595	)		1.05%
Income (loss) before taxes
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(15,308	)		(5,519	)		-63.9%
Net income (loss)		(509	)		2,032			-499.2%
	$	(14,799	)	$	(7,551	)		-49%

Operating Statistics. The following table sets forth our major operational statistics and the percentage-of-change for the years identified below.

	Twelve Months Ended December 31
	2008			2009			% Change
Annual Operating Statistics (unaudited):
Available seat miles (000's) (1)		227,386			165,853			-27	%
Revenue passenger miles (000's) (2)		127,092			89,757			-29	%
Revenue passengers carried		629,563			415,867			-34	%
Departures flown		56,598			43,114			-24	%
Passenger load factor (3)		55.9	%		54.1	%		-3	%
Average yield per revenue passenger mile (4)	$	0.70		$	0.67			-4	%
Revenue per available seat miles (5)	$	0.39		$	0.36			-7	%
Operating costs per available seat mile (6)	$	0.49		$	0.48			-3	%
Fuel cost per available seat mile (9)	$	0.13		$	0.08			-37	%
Average passenger fare (7)	$	140.62		$	143.68			2	%
Average passenger trip length (miles) (8)		202			216			7	%
Aircraft in service (end of period)		23			23			0	%
Fuel cost per gallon (incl taxes & fees)	$	3.36		$	2.00			-40	%