UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-K/A2

 

(Mark One)

 

 

 

Commission file number 000-52754_______

 

(Name of registrant in its charter)

 

 

 

Issuer’s telephone number (561) 391- 6117_____________

 

Securities registered under Section 12 (b) of the Exchange Act:

 

 

 

Securities registered under Section 12 (g) of the Exchange Act:

 

_____________________________________Common Stock $.001 par value__________________________________________

(Title of Class)

 

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

(Title of Class)

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes [_] No x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No [_]

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Yes x No [_]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated file, an accelerated file, a non-accelerated file, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12-b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No [_]

 

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. Zero (-0-)

 

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date. 16,168,733

 

 

 

MONARCH INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC.

FORM 10-K

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This Amendment to the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 of Monarch Investment Properties, Inc. is being filed in response to that certain comment letter dated March 24, 2010 received by the Registrant from the Securities and Exchange Commission and our response letter dated April __, 2010. Specifically, this amended report revises and enhances disclosure in Item 9A, Controls and Procedures, Item 11, Executive Compensation and Item 13, Certain Relationships, as well as the signature page to this report.

 

MONARCH INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC.

FORM 10-K

PART I

 

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K Statement that do not relate to present or historical conditions or facts are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of that term in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may included, without limitation, statements relating to our plans, strategies, objectives, expectations and intentions and are intended to be made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “believes,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “possible,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” and “plans” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Our ability to predict projected results or the effect of events on our operating results is inherently uncertain. Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times at, or by which, such performance or results will be achieved.

 

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statements are made. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information except to the extent required by applicable securities laws. If we update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that we will make additional updates with respect thereto or with respect to other forward-looking statements.

 

While these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment regarding future events, our actual results will likely vary, sometimes materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future performance suggested herein. Some of the risks and assumptions include:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We advise the reader that these cautionary remarks expressly qualify in their entirety all forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf. Important factors that you should also consider, include, but are not limited to, the factors discussed under “Risk Factors” in this annual report.

 

The forward-looking statement in this annual report are made as of the date of this annual report and we do not intend or undertake to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results, except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States.

 

 

Item 1. Business

 

History

 

We were organized under the laws of the State of Nevada under the name Comstock Tailings Company on May 13, 1988 for the purpose of engaging in the acquisition and development of minerals, metals and other natural resource products and the related operations applicable to such activities. On or about March 31, 1997, we consummated a merger with Iron Holdings Corp. (“Old Iron”), a New York corporation, including its wholly-owned subsidiary company, Iron Eagle Contracting & Mechanical, Inc. (“IECM”) and changed our name to Iron Holdings Corp. (“Iron Holdings”). IECM was a construction contractor engaged in pipe work, including gas and water mains, as well as steel installation, primarily for city and state infrastructure construction. IECM commenced operations in January 1996 and spent most of fiscal year 1996 bidding on potential jobs. IECM ceased operations shortly thereafter due to its incurring significant losses from operations.

 

On June 29, 1998, we changed our name to Monarch Investment Properties, Inc.

 

From 1994 to February 1999, we filed reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. On February 11, 1999, we filed a Form 15 terminating the registration of our securities under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.

 

On August 7, 2007, the Company filed Form 10-SB12G on a voluntary basis to provide current public information to the investment community. Accordingly, the Company again became a reporting company.

 

Change of Control

 

During 1997, we defaulted on payment of a promissory note in the principal amount of $1,100,000 representing a loan that had been made to us by JJFN Holdings, Inc. (“JJFN Holdings”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Strategic Capital Resources, Inc. (“Strategic”), in connection with our acquisition of IECM. As a result of this default, during June 1999, JJFN Holdings filed an action in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Queens against us, and our subsidiaries, IECM, Iron Holdings, and Tahoe Realty Corp., as well as two of our officers and certain other individuals, to recover the monies due to JJFN Holdings under the promissory note. During November 2004, the action was settled by: (i) payment from the former principals of the Company of $155,000 to Strategic; (ii) entry by the Court of a judgment against the Company in the amount of $1,100,000 (representing the principal amount of the loan from JJFN) plus accrued interest, (or $1,522,997.20 in the aggregate at the time of the entry of the judgment) (the “JJFN Judgment”), and (iii) surrender of 420,000 shares of common stock of the Company, par value $.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) to Strategic by the former principals and majority stockholders of the Company. As a result of the transfer of shares of Common Stock from the former principals, Strategic acquired a 62.8% equity ownership interest in the Company. Additionally, in connection with the settlement, the former officers and directors of the Company tendered their resignations, and Mr. David Miller, the Company’s President, was first elected and appointed director and officer of the Company.

 

During December 2005, Strategic agreed to convert $1,500,000 of the then current $1,638,000 balance on the JJFN Judgment into 15,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company, which shares were issued to Strategic during March 2006. The 15,000,000 shares were transferred to the stockholders of Strategic pursuant to Strategic’s declaration of a stock dividend in March 2006 in the following amounts: Lite N Low, Inc. – 1,485,000 shares; Priority Capital Corp. – 2,205,000 shares; Helen Miller Irrevocable Trust – 1,770,000 shares; Scott Miller – 1,875,000 shares; Rita Miller – 1,875,000 shares and David Miller 5,790,000 shares. During July 2007, Ms. Rita Miller transferred 1,875,000 shares to her spouse, Mr. David Miller.

 

On March 14, 2005, the Company issued to Strategic a seven-year warrant to purchase 1,100,000 shares of Common Stock, at an exercise price of $.001 per share (“Strategic Warrant”), in consideration for modification of the promissory note between the Company and JJFN Holdings. The Strategic Warrant contains certain anti-dilution provisions which provide that if at any time the number of shares of Common Stock is reduced through subdivision, recapitalization, reclassification or otherwise, or if the Company declares a dividend on its Common Stock or Preferred Stock payable in shares of Common Stock, or if the Company merges or consolidates with or into another entity or sells all or substantially all of it assets, the number and nature of the Common Stock issuable or issued on the exercise of the Strategic Warrant will be adjusted so that each holder of a Strategic Warrant or the original holder of the exercised shares of Common stock outstanding at the time of such event will have the right to purchase the same kind and amount of securities at the original exercise price which the holder would have received if such event has not taken place. The Strategic Warrant also contains a cashless exercise provision providing that payment of the exercise price may be made by surrendering to the Company that number of shares of Common Stock having a fair market value equal to the exercise price. The Strategic Warrant also provides certain “piggyback” registration rights whereby the Company is required to provide prior written notice to Strategic of its intention to file a registration statement under the Securities Act and upon the request of Strategic to include those registrable shares underlying the Strategic Warrant in such registration statement.

 

Business Strategy

 

We have no current operations and we have only nominal assets. We are a “shell company” as that term is defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (i.e., a company which has (i) no or nominal operations; and (ii) either (x) no or nominal assets; (y) assets consisting solely of cash and cash equivalents; or (z) assets consisting of any amount of cash and cash equivalents and nominal other assets). Our primary business plan is to seek, investigate, and, if we believe warranted, acquire one or more companies with business operations and to pursue other related activities intended to enhance stockholder value. Our activities are currently directed at developing our acquisition plan and

 

 

raising initial capital. We have very limited capital, and it is unlikely that or we will be able to take advantage of more than one such business opportunity even if we are presented with more than one business opportunity.

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger with All American Home Products, LLC (“All American”)

 

On December 18, 2007, we executed a Merger Agreement with All American, whereby All American would have merged with and into the Company and the Company would be the surviving corporation. The Merger Agreement was amended by the parties on May 24, 2008, in consideration for $100,000.00, paid by All American to us during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, which would have been credited against the amount All American is required to pay pursuant to the Merger Agreement in assuming certain of the Company’s obligations, as well as all fees and expenses of Strategic Capital Resources, Inc., the Company’s principal stockholder, incurred by it in connection with the Merger. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, as amended, we would have been obligated to issue the holders of All American Units one share of our Common Stock for each Unit held at the Effective Time. Any All American Warrants in existence immediately prior to the merger would have been automatically converted into warrants to purchase our Common Stock subject to the same terms and conditions of the warrants as otherwise in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time, provided that the number of shares to be issued to holders of Units and the exercise price would have been adjusted on the same basis as the shares of Common Stock to be issued in the merger.

 

During all times applicable hereto, All American was experiencing significant financial and other difficulties, including liquidity issues. As a result, All American was unable to provide the Company with its financial information to allow the company to timely file its Definitive Information Statement with the Securities Exchange Commission.

 

On February 17, 2009, after receipt of All American’s financial information, the Company filed its Definitive Information Statement with the SEC. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, as amended, All American was then required to close the Merger on or before March 19, 2009. All American was unable to consummate the Merger. The Company’s Board of Directors directed the Company’s management to notify All American that the Company was no longer willing to extend the closing date of the Merger and further, that the Company was exercising its rights under the Merger Agreement, as amended, to recover all costs incurred by the company relating to the proposed merger. On April 14, 2009, the Company provided formal notice to All American, demanding payment of all fees and expenses in the amount of $315,972. The Company served a summary and complaint against All American, which was served on May 20, 2009. As of the date of this report the Company has not received any funds from All American, or any formal response back to its demand for payment.

 

In December of 2008 a major creditor of All American Home Products initiated litigation against All American for the failure to pay on a promissory note. Then, on February 23, 2009 the major creditor entered a default judgment against All American. On April 13, 2009 the major creditor domesticated its default judgment in Florida against All American.

 

On May 26, 2009 All American filed a petition commencing an Assignment for the Benefit of Creditor (“ABC”) proceeding, pursuant to Chapter 727 of the Florida Statutes. As a result of the ABC, our lawsuit was automatically stayed. Furthermore, as a result of the major creditor’s domesticating their judgment in Florida prior to the May 26, 2009, our claim is automatically subordinated to their claim.

 

On June 12, 2009, the Company filed its Proof of Claim with the Trustee of the ABC. On June 26, 2009 a hearing was held concerning a Letter of Intent to purchase certain assets of All American Home Products, dated May 13, 2009. The Letter of Intent provides for a purchase price of all the assets for $10,000, a $10,000 breakup fee if another bid is received, as well as related fees. The major judgment creditor is contesting the proposed sale.

 

The Company believes that based on the filing of the ABC and the perfection of a judgment claim against All American, it is highly unlikely the Company will have any recovery of its claim.

 

Employees

 

As of June 30, 2009 we had no employees other than our executive officers. Each of our executive officers are engaged in outside business activities and will devote very limited time to our business until a promising business combination opportunity is identified. The business of the Company is managed by one of our shareholders and affiliate, Strategic, pursuant to a letter agreement, dated July 9, 2007.

 

Strategic is currently providing day-to-day management services to the Company pursuant to a letter agreement, date July 9, 2007, for a management fee of $500.00 per month. Strategic’s responsibilities under the agreement include the following services: (i) provision of storage space; (ii) maintenance of the books and records of the Company; (iii) administrative assistance in the preparation and filing of quarterly and annual financial statements, as well as Registration Statements; and (iv) other administrative and management services as may be reasonably required, not to exceed five (5) hours per month. Such additional services may include reviewing and analyzing business combination opportunities for the Company, performing due diligence, and recommending potential merger or acquisition opportunities. Strategic is controlled by David Miller, the President and a Director of the Company.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 

You should carefully consider the risk factors discussed below. The risks discussed below, together with all of the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing herein, any of which could materially affect our business, financial conditions or results of operations, are not the only risks we face.

 

 

Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we deem to be immaterial could also materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

We currently have very limited assets, no sources of revenue or business operations, and will need additional financing in order to execute our business plan.

 

We do not currently have any assets other than a cash balance of $5,179 as of June 30, 2009. We have not generated any revenues for at least the past few years, and we do not expect to generate any revenues until such time, if ever, as we complete an acquisition, reorganization, merger or similar transaction with an operating business. We can provide no assurances if we consummate a transaction that any acquired business will generate any material revenues or that any such business will operate on a profitable basis. Furthermore, we are unable to predict the time as to when, and if ever, that we may actually acquire or enter into an acquisition, reorganization, merger or similar transaction with an operating business. Because we do not have a recent operating history, you will have no basis upon which to evaluate our business objective to acquire an operating business.

 

Since we have not had business operations in recent years, we are considered a shell company under the federal securities laws which may have an adverse effect on our business and how we are perceived in the business community.

 

Under the federal securities laws, we are considered a shell company because, at June 30, 2009, we had nominal operations and assets consisting of $5,179, representing cash and cash equivalents. The SEC rules (i) prohibit the use of a Registration Statement on Form S-8 by a shell company and (ii) require a shell company or its successor to file a Current Report on Form 8-K disclosing a transaction that caused the company to lose its shell company status and including information that the shell company or its successor would be required to provide if it were registering a class of securities on Form 10, as applicable, under the Exchange Act. Our future operating results depend on many factors, including, but not limited to our ability to implement our growth strategy, and we anticipate that we will operate as a shell company until such time as we can develop stable and revenue-generating operations. Our status as a shell company may have an adverse effect on our business.

 

We will require additional financing in the near future or our business will fail.

 

Based on our currently proposed plans and assumptions, we will require additional funds to implement our proposed acquisition plan over the next 12 months. Currently, Strategic is providing the working capital for our business and there can be no assurances that Strategic will continue to fund our expenses in the future. We may seek to obtain additional financing from a number of affiliated or unaffiliated sources that could involve, among others possible sales of our equity or debt securities, or borrowings from financial institutions. We do not have any arrangements with respect to, or sources of, additional financing, and we may not be able to sell any such securities or obtain any loans on terms and conditions acceptable to us or at all when we need it. Such funds, even if received, may not be sufficient for our purposes. If we fail to obtain additional financing in the future, it would have a material adverse effect on our operations, possibly requiring postponing the implementation of our business plan. Any equity financing may involve substantial dilution of the interest of our then current stockholders. Any debt financing could subject us to the risks associated with leverage, including the possible risk of an inability to repay the debt as it comes due.

 

Because we have limited capital resources, we will have difficulty attracting and retaining qualified personnel.

 

We will need to attract and retain highly qualified, managerial personnel in order to implement our strategy. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we may be unable to locate and retain highly qualified managerial personnel either currently or in the future. If we are unable to attract and retain the necessary managerial personnel, it would have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

We are dependent on the efforts of management to identify potential business combination opportunities.

 

Our success is substantially dependent on the performance of our management in assisting us in the identification of business combination opportunities. In particular, our success depends substantially on the continued efforts of David Miller, our President.

 

We currently do not have key person life insurance on our officers and even if we seek to obtain this insurance may be unable to obtain such insurance in the near future due to high cost or other reasons. We also do not have written employment agreements with any members of our management. We believe that the loss of the services of Mr. Miller would have a material adverse effect on our efforts to identify merger and acquisition opportunities and ultimately consummate a business combination.

 

We face significant competition for business opportunities and combinations.

 

We are not a significant participant in the business of seeking a business combination partner. A large number of established and well-financed entities, including venture capital firms, are active in mergers and acquisitions of companies which may be merger or acquisition target candidates for us. Nearly all such entities have significantly greater financial resources, technical expertise and managerial capabilities than we do and, consequently, we will be at competitive disadvantage in identifying possible business opportunities and successfully completing a business combination. Moreover, we will also compete with numerous small public companies in seeking merger or acquisition candidates.

 

 

Our officers and directors will allocate their time to other business thereby causing conflicts of interest in their determination as to how much time to devote to our affairs, and this conflict of interest could have a negative impact on our ability to consummate a business combination.

 

Our officers and directors are not required to commit their full time to our affairs, which could create a conflict of interest when allocating their time between our operations and their other commitments. We do not intend to have any full time employees prior to the consummation of an acquisition, reorganization, merger or similar transaction with an operating business. All of our executive officers are engaged in several other business endeavors and are not obligated to devote any specific number of hours to our affairs. If our officers’ and directors’ other business affairs require them to devote more substantial amounts of time to such affairs, it could limit their ability to devote time to our affairs and could have a negative impact on our ability to consummate a business combination. We cannot assure you that these conflicts will be resolved in our favor.

 

We may issue shares or debt securities to complete a business combination, which would reduce the equity interest of our stockholders and likely cause a change in control of our ownership.

 

Although we do not have a current unequivocal commitment, we would likely issue a substantial number of additional shares of our Common Stock or preferred stock, or a combination of Common Stock and preferred stock, to complete a business combination. The issuance of additional shares of Common Stock or any number of shares of our preferred stock:

 

 

 

 

Similarly, if we issue debt securities, it could result in:

 

 

 

 

The resulting change in control of the Company would likely result in removal of the present executive officers and directors of the Company and a corresponding reduction in or elimination of such person’s participation in the future affairs of the Company.

 

Our current members of management are also controlling stockholders.

 

Our affiliate and principal security holder Strategic is currently providing management services to us for a fee accruing at a monthly rate of $500.00. Strategic is controlled by David Miller, the President and a Director of the Company. Strategic, Mr. Miller and their affiliates together beneficially own over 93% of our outstanding Common Stock and are in a position to control all matters requiring approval of our stockholders, including the election of director and proposed acquisitions.

 

We will continue to incur increased costs as a result of becoming a reporting company.

 

With the effectiveness of the Registration Statement-Form 10SB12G, we are an SEC reporting company. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as a variety of related rules implemented by the SEC, have required changes in corporate governance practices and generally increased the disclosure requirements of public companies. For example, as a result of becoming a reporting company, we will be required to file periodic and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC and we must adopt policies regarding disclosure controls and procedures and regularly evaluate those controls and procedures. As a reporting company, we will incur significant additional legal, accounting and other expenses in connection with our public disclosure and other obligations. Management has also been engaged in assisting executive officers, directors and, to a more limited extent, stockholders, with matters related to insider trading and beneficial ownership reporting. Although not presently applicable to us, in the future we will be required to establish, evaluate and report on our internal control over financial reporting and to have our registered independent public accounting firm issue an attestation as to such reports.

 

We have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, increased general and administrative expenses as a reporting company. We also believe that compliance with the myriad rules and regulations applicable to reporting companies and related compliance issues will divert time and attention of management away from operating and growing our business. We do not currently have the financial resources to maintain compliance with the legal requirements of public companies.

 

 

Being a public company also increases the risk of exposure to class action stockholder lawsuits and SEC enforcement actions and increases the expense to obtain appropriate director and officer liability insurance on acceptable or even reduced policy limits and coverage. As a result, we may find it difficult to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our Board of Directors or as executive officers.

 

Our Common Stock is publicly traded in the future and is subject to the SEC’s penny stock rules, broker-dealers may experience difficulty in completing customer transactions and trading activity in our securities may be adversely affected.

 

A penny stock is generally defined under the Exchange Act as any equity security other than a security that: (i) is a national market system stock listed on a “grandfathered” national securities exchange, (ii) is a national market system stock listed on a national securities exchange or an automated quotation system sponsored by a registered national securities association (including NASDAQ) that satisfies certain minimum quantitative listing standards, (iii) has a transaction price of five dollars or more, or (iv) is a security whose issuer has met certain net tangible assets or average revenues, among other exemptions. Our Common Stock is not currently traded on a national securities exchange or quotation system sponsored by a national securities exchange and our transaction price is currently less than five dollars. Therefore, if we have net tangible assets of $5,000,000 or less, transactions in the Common Stock may become subject to the “penny stock” rules promulgated under the Exchange Act. In accordance with these rules, broker-dealers participating in transactions in low-priced securities must first deliver a risk disclosure document that describes the risks associated with such stocks, the broker-dealer’s must make a suitability determination approving the customer for low-priced stock transactions based on the customer’s financial situation, investment experience and objectives. Broker-dealers must also disclose these restrictions in writing to the customer, obtain specific written consent from the customer and provide monthly account statements to the customer. The effect of these restrictions will probably decrease the willingness of broker-dealers to make a market in our Common Stock, decrease liquidity of our Common Stock and increase transaction costs for sales and purchases of our Common Stock as compared to other securities. If our Common Stock becomes subject to these rules, broker-dealers may find it difficult to effectuate customer transactions and trading activity in our securities may be adversely affected. As a result, the market price of our securities may be depressed and stockholders may find it more difficult to sell their shares of Common Stock.

 

If we fail to maintain and effective system of internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, we may be unable to accurately report our financial results and comply with the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act.

 

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 404”), we are required, as a non-accelerated filer, beginning with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2008, to include in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, our management’s report on internal control over financial reporting and, beginning with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010, the registered public accounting firm’s attestation report on our management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. We are required to prepare an internal plan of action for compliance with the requirements of Section 404. As a result, we cannot guarantee that we will not have any “significant deficiencies” or “material weaknesses” within our processes. Compliance with the requirements of Section 404 is expected to be expensive and time-consuming. If we fail to complete this evaluation in a timely manner, we could be subject to regulatory scrutiny and a loss of public confidence in our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, any failure to establish an effective system of disclosure controls and procedures could cause our current and potential stockholders and customers to lose confidence in our financial reporting and disclosure required under the Exchange Act, which could adversely affect our business.

 

Our charter documents limit the liability of our directors and officers.

 

Our Articles of Incorporation include provisions, subject to certain exceptions, to limit, to the fullest extent permitted by Nevada General Corporation Law as in effect from time to time, the personal liability of our directors for monetary damages arising from a breach of their fiduciary duties as directors. Our Articles of Incorporation also include provisions to the effect that we will, to the maximum extent permitted from time to time under the law of the State of Nevada, indemnify any director or officer. In addition, our By-laws require us to indemnify any director, officer, employee or agent for acts which such person reasonably believes are not in violation of our corporate purposes as set forth in our Articles of Incorporation, to the fullest extent permitted by law.

 

Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation authorize us to issue additional shares of capital stock.

 

We are authorized to issue under our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, 525,000,000 shares of capital stock, consisting of 500,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Our Board of Directors has the ability to issue additional shares of Common Stock and preferred stock in the future for such consideration as the Board may consider sufficient without seeking stockholder approval. The issuance of additional Common Stock, preferred stock or other convertible securities in the future will reduce the proportionate ownership and could also reduce the voting power of current stockholders.

 

We do not intend to pay future cash dividends.

 

We currently do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our Common Stock at any time in the near future. Any decision to pay dividends will depend upon our profitability at the time, cash available and other factors. We may never pay cash dividends or distributions on our Common Stock.

 

We likely will complete only one business combination, which will cause us to be dependent solely on a single business and a limited number of products, services or assets.

 

 

Given our limited financial resources and other considerations, it is likely that if we complete a business combination it will be with only one target business. Accordingly, the prospects for our success may be solely dependent upon the performance of a single business and dependent upon the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of products, processes or services. In this case, we will not be able to diversify our operations or benefit from the possible spreading of risks or offsetting of losses, unlike other entities which may have the resources to complete business combinations or asset acquisitions in different industries or different areas of a single industry so as to diversify risks and offset losses.

 

Because of losses incurred by us to date and our general financial condition, we received a going concern qualification in the audit report from our independent public accounting firm for the most recent fiscal year that raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue to operate as a going concern.

 

Our independent auditors have issued a going concern paragraph in their opinion on the financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2008 and 2009 that states there is a substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to assess capital through debt and equity funding, to develop profitable operations and resolve our liquidity problems. If we are not able to continue as a going concern, we may cease to operate and our investors will lose some or all of their investment.

 

Lack of Liquidity

 

Our stock has not been traded in a while. Before requiring stock in the Company investors should consider that this lack of liquidity would make it difficult for investors to trade their shares in the given market.

 

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

 

Not applicable

 

Item 2. Properties

 

We do not own or have a lease for any property. Our principal place of business is provided by Strategic at 1801 N. Military Trail, Suite 203, Boca Raton, Florida 33431 on a rent free basis.

 

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

 

Monarch is not a party to any legal proceedings and no such proceedings are known to be contemplated other than the claim against All American. See Item 1 – Business – Plan of Merger.

 

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

None

 

[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]

 

 

PART II

 

Item 5.  Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

 

A. Market Information

 

To the best of our knowledge our Common Stock is not currently quoted or traded on any exchange or inter-dealer electronic quotation service.

 

B. Dividend Policy

 

No dividends have been declared or paid on our common stock. We have incurred recurring losses and do not currently intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

 

C. Holders

 

As of June 30, 2009, we had 42 holders of our Common Stock, not including those persons who hold their shares in “street name”.

 

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

 

We are a small reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this item.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Plan of Operation

 

Overview

 

We were organized under the laws of the State of Nevada under the name Comstock Tailings Company on May 13, 1988 for the purpose of engaging in the acquisition and development of minerals, metals and other natural resources products and the related operations applicable to such activities. On or about March 31, 1997, the Company consummated a merger with Old Iron, including its wholly-owned subsidiary company. IECM changing its name to Iron Holdings. IECM was a construction contractor engaged in pipe work, including gas and water mains, as well as steel installation, primarily for city and state infrastructure construction. On June 29, 1998, our stockholders approved the changes of the company name to its present name, Monarch Investment Properties, Inc. In recent years Monarch has not conducted any business operations.

 

From 1994 to 1999, we filed reports with the SEC pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. On February 11, 1999, we filed a Form 15 terminating the registration of our securities und Section 12 of the Exchange Act. On August 7, 2007, the Company filed a Form 10-SB12G on a voluntary basis to provide current public information to the investment community. Accordingly, the Company again became a reporting company.

 

With virtually no operating history and the uncertain nature of the markets we address or intend to address, it is difficult to predict our future results of operations. Our operations may never generate significant revenues or any revenues whatsoever, and we may never achieve profitable operations.

 

Our Business Strategy

 

Our current business plan is to serve as a vehicle for the acquisition of or merger or consolidation with a target business. We intend to effect a business combination with a target business which we believe has significant growth potential. The business combination may be with a financially stable, mature company or a company that is in its early stages of development or growth.

 

On December 18, 2007, we executed a Merger Agreement with All American, whereby All American would have merged with and into the Company and the Company would be the surviving corporation. The Merger Agreement was amended by the parties on May 24, 2008, in consideration for $100,000.00, paid by All American to us during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, which would have been credited against the amount All American is required to pay pursuant to the Merger Agreement in assuming certain of the Company’s obligations, as well as all fees and expenses of Strategic Capital Resources, Inc., the Company’s principal stockholder, incurred by it in connection with the Merger. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, as amended, we would have been obligated to issue the holders of All American Units one share of our Common Stock for each Unit held at the Effective Time. Any All American Warrants in existence immediately prior to the merger would have been automatically converted into warrants to purchase our Common Stock subject to the same terms and conditions of the warrants as otherwise in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time, provided that the number of shares to be issued to holders of Units and the exercise price would have been adjusted on the same basis as the shares of Common Stock to be issued in the merger.

 

During all times applicable hereto, All American was experiencing significant financial and other difficulties, including liquidity issues. As a result, All American was unable to provide the Company with its financial information to allow the company to timely file its Definitive Information Statement with the Securities Exchange Commission.

 

 

On February 17, 2009, after receipt of All American’s financial information, the Company filed its Definitive Information Statement with the SEC. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, as amended, All American was then required to close the Merger on or before March 19, 2009. All American was unable to consummate the Merger. The Company’s Board of Directors directed the Company’s management to notify All American that the Company was no longer willing to extend the closing date of the Merger and further, that the Company was exercising its rights under the Merger Agreement, as amended, to recover all costs incurred by the company relating to the proposed merger. On April 14, 2009, the Company provided formal notice to All American, demanding payment of all fees and expenses. As of the date of this report the Company has not received any funds from All American, or any formal response back to its demand for payment. The Company intends to enforce its rights to collect the balance of $315,972 against All American. See Item 1 – Business – Plan of Merger.

 

Financial Condition and Changes

 

Cash

 

We have minimal cash and are dependent in the short term on affiliated parties to continue to infuse capital to meet our obligations. There is no assurance that this funding will continue.

 

Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities

 

Accrued expenses at June 30, 2009 and 2008 consisted primarily of professional fees. Listed below is a summary of the transactions related to accrued expenses and other liabilities:

 

 

Convertible Judgment Debt Payable

 

Listed below is a summary of the transactions related to the JJFN Judgment obtained by JJFN Holdings against us in November 2004. Unpaid portions of the JJFN Judgment bear simple interest at the rate of 9% per annum:

 

 

Affiliated Party Debt

 

To date, our operations have been funded by Strategic Capital Resources, Inc. which is controlled by one of our executive officers. Listed below is a summary of the transactions related to the debt we owe to Strategic:

 

 

 

Results of Operations

 

We have generated no revenues since our fiscal year ended 1998 and will not generate revenues until, at the earliest, the completion of a business combination. There can be no assurance that we will be able to consummate a business combination on terms acceptable to us and our stockholders.

 

Year Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to the Year Ended June 30, 2008

 

General and administrative expenses were $70,137 for the year ended June 30, 2009, as compared to $157,471 for the year ended June 30, 2008, a decrease of $87,334. Legal expenses in 2009 and 2008 resulted primarily from our efforts to facilitate a merger as well as the costs of SEC Filings related to the Merger. Filing fees in 2009 comprise of $15,000 to Strategic Capital Resources, Inc. and $2,500 for accounting firm to review public filings related to the proposed Merger. The Company did receive from the potential merger candidate a non-refundable, partial reimbursements of some of the costs of the proposed merger. Listed below is a summary of these expenses:

 

 

Other income and interest expense for the year ended June 30, 2008 netted to income of $62,021. It is comprised of $100,000 which was received from All American as a partial reimbursement payment to be applied towards fees and expenses incurred in the ordinary course of business in connection with the proposed merger. Interest expense was $37,883 for the year ended June 30, 2009, compared to $37,979 for the year ended June 30, 2008.

 

As a result of the foregoing, we incurred a net loss of $108,020 for the year ended June 30, 2009, compared to a net loss of $95,450 for the year ended June 30, 2008. The net expenses in 2008 would have been in comparison substantially higher were it not for the corresponding reimbursement of some of the Merger costs.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

At June 30, 2009, our cash balance was $5,179 and we had a working capital deficit of $521,163.

 

To date, our operations have been funded by Strategic which is controlled by our President. This funding included paying professional fees, interest on the affiliated debt as well as accruing $500 per month for management fees and $17,500 related to the merger filing fees. The $500 per month that is being charged to us by Strategic for the maintenance of our files and records, preparation of work papers for the quarterly reviews, as well as the preparation of work papers for the year-end audit for the outside auditors. The $500 per month also includes the preparation of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q as well as the Annual Report on Form 10-K and the filings of Form 8-K as well as the ongoing efforts to find a suitable merger partner for us.

 

The $15,000 fee that was charged in connection with the AAHP/Monarch Merger represents time and costs associated with the negotiation of the merger with the principals of AAHP and their attorneys, as well as their investment bankers. It further includes the review of AAHP’s financial statements and operations on an on-going basis as well as meetings with their outside auditors. Additionally, it includes assistance in the preparation and review of the proposed Form 8-K12(g)(3)(a) to be filed pursuant to the Merger Agreements.

 

For the year ended June 30, 2009, we had negative cash flows from operating activities of $70,440 compared to negative cash flows of $53,783 for the year ended June 30, 2008, an increase of $16,657. We have been dependent upon proceeds of loans from Strategic to fund continuing activities. For the year ended June 30, 2009 our loans from Strategic increased by $74,235.

 

 

 

We currently do not have sufficient cash reserves to meet all of our anticipated obligations for the next twelve months and there can be no assurance we will ultimately obtain the necessary financing. In addition to any third-party financing that may be obtained, we currently expect that loans from our stockholders may be a continuing source of liquidity to meet our obligations. Accordingly, we will need to seek funding in the near future.

 

Our independent auditors have issued a going concern paragraph in their opinion on the financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2009 that states there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to obtain capital through debt and equity funding.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

The significant accounting policies are summarized as follows:

 

Use of Estimates

 

Our management has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses, convertible judgment debt payable and stockholder payable approximate their fair market value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments.

 

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 107 requires disclosures about the fair value for all financial instruments, whether or not recognized, for financial statement purposes. Disclosures about fair value of financial instruments are based on pertinent information available to management as of June 30, 2009 and 2008. Accordingly, any estimates presented in these statements are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized on disposition of the financial instruments.

 

Management has estimated the fair values of cash, accounts payable, and accrued expenses to be approximately their respective carrying values reported on these statements because of their short maturities. Our accounting policies are described in Note 5 to our financial statements. Also please see Note 5 to our financial statements for Recent Accounting Pronouncements.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, investments in special purpose entities or undisclosed borrowings or debt. Additionally, we are not a party to any derivative contracts or synthetic leases.

 

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures Above Market Risk

 

We are a small reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this item.

 

Item 8. Financial Statements

 

The following financial statements are filed as a part of this Form 10-K immediately following the signature page:

 

 

 

Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

During the two years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 Monarch has not filed a Form 8-K reporting a change of accountants, nor has there been any material disagreement with its accountants on any matter regarding accounting or financial disclosure.

 

 

Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures

 

 

As required by Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period covered in this report, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer,.

 

These controls are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Based on this evaluation our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded, that as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Inherent Limitations -Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdown can occur because of simple error or mistake. In particular, many of our current processes rely upon manual reviews and processes to ensure that neither human error nor system weakness has resulted in erroneous reporting of financial data.

 

(b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

 

Management of the Company is also responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

The Company’s internal controls over financial reporting are intended to be designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s internal controls over financial reporting are expected to include those policies and procedures that management believes are necessary that:

 

(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

 

(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and

 

(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

As required by Rule 13a-15(c) promulgated under the Exchange Act, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009. In evaluating internal controls, management considered the amount our financial activities and resources. We have for the past several years, used the services of Strategic’s accounting department to assist in completing the financial reporting process, but ultimately our principal executive officer and principal financial officer are responsible not only for controls, but also for all other aspects of general ledger, disbursements and receipts, and financial statement preparation. Management’s assessment was based on criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control over Financial Reporting – Guidance for Smaller Public Companies. Management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009. Management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2009.

 

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report on internal control in this Annual Report.

 

 

There were no changes in our internal controls or in other factors that occurred during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect these internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Item 9B. Other Information

 

Not Applicable

 

[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]

 

 

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

The directors of Monarch are elected to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until their respective successors have been elected and qualified. Officers of Monarch are elected by the Board of Directors and hold office until their successors are elected and qualified.

 

As of June 30, 2009 the officer and directors of Monarch are:

 

 

There are no family relationships among our executive officers and directors.

 

David Miller served on our Board of Directors from November 2004 to December 2005 and from June 2007 to the present. From March 2005 to the present, he has also served as our President. From September 1997 to the present, Mr. Miller has served in the positions of chairman, president and chief executive officer of Strategic Capital Resources, Inc., a privately owned specialty financing company. Mr. Miller is the chairman of the privately owned corporations, Lite ‘N Low, Inc. and Priority Capital Corp. Mr. Miller has over 40 years of experience in the finance industry.

 

John H. (Casey) Roach, Jr. has served as our Director since March 2005. Since December 2006, Mr. Roach has served as Senior managing Director and Senior Vice President of TD Wealth Management (Formerly Commerce Bank Private Banking division). Mr. Roach’s appointment at TD Wealth Management marked the launch of a dedicated private banking team to serve high net worth clients in the Westchester and Connecticut markets. Mr. Roach is an experienced financial services executive whose career, which spans more that 40 years, has focused on asset and wealth management, corporate finance, investment banking, credit and insurance. He is on the board of several companies including Priva Technologies, Inc., a firm which specializes in authentication and security and Strategic Capital Resources, Inc., a specialty financing company.

 

Ralph J. Wilson has served as our director since March 2005. Mr. Wilson has served as the director, secretary and treasurer of Comet Electronics Corporation, a privately held electronics manufacturer from November 1966 to present. He also has been a director of Strategic Capital Resources, Inc. since 1995.

 

Philip Bloom was appointed in May 2008 as our principal financial and accounting officer. Mr. Bloom has been in South Florida for the past 17 years in the financial services industry. He has served on the Board of Directors of Strategic Capital Resources, Inc. since May 2007.

 

Mr. David Miller, and the other Board Members, as well as Mr. Bloom, are actively involved in the ownership, management and operation of other business, including the business of Strategic Capital Resources, Inc. As such, they may have conflicts of interest in the allocation of business time which may have an adverse affect on our business and operations.

 

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

 

We are not a party to any pending legal proceeding other than our collection claim against All American. See Item 1 – Business – Plan of Merger. To the knowledge of our management, no federal, state or local governmental agency is presently contemplating any proceeding against us. To the knowledge of our management, no director, executive officer or affiliate of ours or owner of record or beneficially of more than five percent (5%) of our common stock is a party adverse to us or has a material interest adverse to us in any proceeding.

 

Code of Ethics

 

Due to the limited scope of our current operations, the Company has not yet adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. However, upon the completion of a reverse merger transaction or business combination with an operating company, we intend to adopt a formal Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

 

 

Audit Committee

 

The Board of Directors acts as the audit committee. The Company believes that it has inadequate financial resources at this time to hire such an expert.

 

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

 

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires or directors and officers, and the persons who beneficially own more than ten percent (10%) of our common stock, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Copies of all filed reports are required to be furnished to us pursuant to Rule 16a-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. Based solely on the reports received by us and on the representations of the reporting persons, we believe that these persons have complied with all applicable filing requirements during the year ended Jun 30, 2009.

 

Item 11. Executive Compensation

 

During our fiscal years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, no executive officer received any compensation. It is not anticipated that any of our executive officers will receive material compensation in the foreseeable future. Following is a table containing the aggregate compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer and all other officers who received aggregate compensation exceeding $100,000 during our fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007:

 

 

   

 

Our directors do not receive any compensation for services rendered in such capacities.

 

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

The following table sets forth certain information as of June 30, 2009 with respect to the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock by the following individuals and groups:

 

 

 

 

 

Trail, Suite 203, Boca Raton, Florida 33431. The address of the Helen Miller Irrevocable Trust is 7691 Porto Vecchio Place, Delray Beach, Florida 33446.

 

 

 

 

Each person in the table above is considered the beneficial owner of securities that it can acquire through the exercise or conversion of warrants or other convertible securities that are exercisable or convertible within 60 days from July 31, 2009. In calculating each beneficial owner’s percentage ownership, we have assumed that the warrants held by that person that are exercisable within 60 days from July 31, 2007 have been exercised. Some of our securities may be beneficially owned by more than one person.

 

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Directors Independence

 

To date, our operations have been funded by loans from Strategic, which is controlled by our President, David Miller. These loans included paying professional fees and interest on the affiliated debt. We have been dependent upon proceeds of loans from Strategic to fund continuing activities. We recorded management fees of $500 per month for the use of office space and for administrative and management services provided by Strategic for the period November 3, 2004 through June 30, 2009. At June 30, 2009, the balance due under this obligation was $235,318. For the year ended June 30, 2009 our loans from Strategic increased by $74,235. This loan is due on demand and bears interest at12% per annum. Interest is due and added to the payable amount on the first day of each month. Management believes that the terms of the loan were made on equal or better terms than were available elsewhere.

 

This loan also includes a $15,000 fee related to work performed pertaining to the aborted Merger with All American and the related review of the 14C filing.

 

There are no other related party transactions that are required to be disclosed pursuant to Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

 

Director Independence

 

We believe that Messrs. John H. Roach, Jr. and Ralph Wilson are considered “independent” directors pursuant to the provisions of Item 407(a) of Regulation S-K. We do not have an audit, compensation or nominating committee. These functions are performed by our Board of Directors. David Miller, our principal shareholder and President, is also Chairman of our Board of Directors and is not deemed to be an “independent” director.

 

Item 14. Principal Account Fees and Services

 

(a) Audit Fees

 

Our principal accountant, Sherb & Co., LLP, billed us aggregate fees in the amount of approximately $16,000 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 and $14,500 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. These amounts were billed for professional services that Sherb & Co, LLP provided for the audit of our annual financial statements, review of the financial statements included in our report on Form 10-Q, and other services typically provided by an accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years as well as quarterly 10-Q’s.

 

(b) Audit – Related Fees

 

No other audit related fees were billed to the Company for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.

 

(c) Tax Fees

 

Sherb & Co., LLP billed fees of $1,500 per year for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.

 

 

PART IV

 

Item 15. Exhibits

 

Exhibit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this amended report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

 

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this amended Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on April 9, 2010.

 

s/ David Miller_____________________________

David Miller, Director

 

_________________________________________

John H. Roach, Jr, Director

 

s/ Ralph Wilson_____________________________

Ralph Wilson, Director

 

 

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Monarch Investment Properties, Inc.

          We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Monarch Investment Properties, Inc. as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ deficiency, and cash flows for each of the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

          We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

          In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and cash flows for each of the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.

          The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that Monarch Investment Properties, Inc. will continue as a going concern. As more fully described in Note 3, the Company has incurred recurring operating losses and will have to obtain additional capital to sustain operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Notes 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

New York, New York

August 13, 2009

F-1

 

 

MONARCH INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

See accompanying notes to the financial statements

F-2

 

 

MONARCH INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

See accompanying notes to the financial statements

F-3

 

 

MONARCH INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

See accompanying notes to the financial statements

F-4

 

 

MONARCH INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

See accompanying notes to the financial statements

F-5

 

 

MONARCH INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED

JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

Note 1 - Organization and Business Activity

Monarch Investment Properties, Inc. (the “Company” or “Monarch”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on May 13, 1988, under the name Comstock Tailings Company, Incorporated, for the purpose of engaging in the acquisition and development of minerals, metals and other natural resource products and the related operations applicable to such activities. Until September 1993 and other than issuing shares to its original shareholders, the Company never commenced activities relating to its original business purpose. In September 1993, the Board of Directors of the Company elected to change the Company’s principal business purpose to a “shell” corporation engaged in seeking out and acquiring another business entity or opportunity. Applicable thereto, the Company filed a registration statement on Form 10-SB with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about January 12, 1994, which registration statement became effective in August 1994.

Relevant thereto, on or about March 31, 1997, the Company consummated a merger with Iron Holding Corp. (“Old IHC”), a New York corporation. The terms of the transaction involved the Company issuing an aggregate of 4,500,000 shares of its “restricted” Common Stock (pre reverse split) to the former shareholders of Old IHC in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding stock of Old IHC. Old IHC did not survive the transaction. The Company also changed its name to Iron Holdings Corp. On June 29, 1998, the Company’s shareholders approved the change of the Company’s name to its present name, Monarch Investment Properties, Inc.

Old IHC was incorporated on October 3, 1996 in the State of New York. On January 8, 1997, Old IHC entered into an agreement and acquired all of the shares of Iron Eagle Contracting and Mechanical, Inc., a New York corporation (“IECM”). The effective date of this acquisition was October 3, 1996. It operated all of its business through this subsidiary, which business was construction contracting engaged in pipe work including gas and water mains as well as steel installation, primarily in the New York City metropolitan area. As a result of the reorganization described above herein, Old IHC ceased to exist following the merger.

Subsequent to the closing of the merger, the Company was a holding company for three wholly owned subsidiary companies, including IECM. IECM engaged in two lines of business since its incorporation in December 1995. Its principal business was construction contracting. The other business line was the development and sale of residential real estate. However, due to this company incurring significant losses from operations, it ceased operations in June 1998. The other two subsidiary companies, L.W. Plaza Realty Corp. (“LWP”) and Tahoe Realty Corp. (“Tahoe”), each a New York corporation, were dormant until April 1998. At that time, Tahoe commenced business activities, engaging in real estate acquisition, development and management activities.

On June 29, 1998, the Company’s shareholders and Directors approved a reverse split of its issued and outstanding common stock, effective July 31, 1998, whereby one share of common stock was issued in exchange for every 10 shares then issued and outstanding. This reverse stock split was adopted by a majority of the Company’s voting common stock. All references to the number of issued and outstanding shares of the company’s common Stock included in this report have been adjusted to reflect this reverse stock split, except as stated therein.

On February 11, 1999 the Company filed a Form 15 which is a certification and notice of termination of registration under Section 12 (g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or suspension of duty to file reports under Sections 13 and 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

On August 7, 2007 the Company filed a Form 10-SB on a voluntary basis to provide current public information to the investment community. Accordingly, the Company again became a reporting company.

F-6

 

 

MONARCH INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED

JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

Note 2 - Change of Control

On November 3, 2004 the Company settled its litigation with Strategic Capital Resources, Inc. (“SCRI”) on the following basis.

As a result of the foregoing, Monarch became a majority owned subsidiary of SCRI and was required to be consolidated into the financial statements of SCRI.

As a result of the litigation settlement (see Note 11 – Litigation) SCRI acquired majority control (62.8%) of Monarch. SCRI consolidated Monarch into its financial statements as a result of their percentage of ownership and control through December 31, 2005. In the quarter ended March 31, 2006, SCRI’s ownership interest in Monarch was eliminated and was no longer a controlling shareholder. Accordingly, SCRI deconsolidated Monarch from its financial statements.

During December, 2005, SCRI agreed to convert $1,500,000 of the $1,638,000 judgment it had against Monarch into 15,000,000 shares of the common stock of Monarch. The purpose of the conversion was to make Monarch a “Public Shell” marketable to a potential merger candidate or purchaser. SCRI declared a dividend on December 2, 2005 of 15,000,000 shares of Monarch common stock payable pro rata to SCRI’s shareholders of record as of December 15, 2005 with a distribution date of December 22, 2005. Monarch and SCRI implemented the conversations and SCRI distributed the shares to its shareholders in March 2006. (See Note 8 – Income Taxes and Note 11 – Litigation).

As a result of the cessation of operations and liquidation of all assets the Company became a “Shell Company”.

Securities Act Rule 405 and Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 defines a “Shell Company” as a company, other than an asset-backed issuer, with:

 

As a result of the change of control Monarch utilization of the loss carryforward for federal and state income tax purposes may be limited.

F-7

 

 

MONARCH INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED

JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

Note 3 - Going Concern

As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company incurred a net loss of $108,020 negative cash flow from operations of $70,440 for the year ended June 30, 2009, has an accumulated deficit of $3,370,573 and a stockholders’ deficiency of $521,163 at June 30, 2009. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain financing and achieve profitable operations. Management intends to continue to seek additional debt or equity financing to fund its anticipated losses until a worthy merger candidate is located. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. These matters raise substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Note 4 – Agreement and Plan of Merger

On December 18, 2007 the Company and All American Home Products, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“All American”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which All American agreed to merge with, and into, the Company (the “Merger”). Certain provisions of the Merger Agreement were amended effective February 29, 2008. The Board of Directors of the Company unanimously approved the Merger Agreement and amendment. The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for both parties. Consummation of the Merger was also subject to customary closing conditions, and representations, warranties and covenants from each of the Company and All American.

Details of the Merger Agreement, as amended, and information related to the business of All American and its unaudited financial statements for the interim period ended September 30, 2007 and its audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006 and accompanying notes were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2008 in a Preliminary Information Statement (the “Information Statement”) pursuant to Section 14(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and on December 27, 2007 and May 30, 2008 in current reports on Form 8-K. In accordance with SEC regulations, All American’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007, as well as reviewed unaudited interim financial statements through September 30, 2008, were required to be filed with the SEC in an amended Preliminary Information Statement.

During all times applicable hereto, All American was experiencing significant financial and other difficulties, including liquidity issues. As a result, All American was unable to provide the Company with its financial information to allow the Company to timely file its Definitive Information Statement with the Securities Exchange Commission.

On February 17, 2009, after receipt of All American’s financial information, the Company filed its Definitive Information Statement with the SEC. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, as amended, All American was then required to close the Merger on or before March 19, 2009. All American was unable to consummate the Merger. The Company’s Board of Directors directed the Company’s management to notify All American that the Company was no longer willing to extend the closing date of the Merger and further, that the Company was exercising its rights under the Merger Agreement, as amended, to recover all costs incurred by the company relating to the proposed merger. On April 14, 2009, the Company provided formal notice to All American, demanding payment of all fees and expenses in the amount of $315,972. The Company served a summary and complaint against All American, which was served on May 20, 2009. As of the date of this report the Company has not received any funds from All American, or any formal response back to its demand for payment.

F-8

 

 

MONARCH INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED

JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

In December of 2008 a major creditor of All American Home Products initiated litigation against All American for the failure to pay on a promissory note. Then, on February 23, 2009 the major creditor entered a default judgment against All American. On April 13, 2009 the major creditor domesticated its default judgment in Florida against All American.

On May 26, 2009 All American filed a petition commencing an Assignment for the Benefit of Creditor (“ABC”) proceeding, pursuant to Chapter 727 of the Florida Statutes. As a result of the ABC, our lawsuit was automatically stayed. Furthermore, as a result of the major creditor’s domesticating their judgment in Florida prior to the May 26, 2009, our claim is automatically subordinated to their claim.

On June 12, 2009, the Company filed its Proof of Claim with the Trustee of the ABC. On June 26, 2009 a hearing was held concerning a Letter of Intent to purchase certain assets of All American Home Products, dated May 13, 2009. The Letter of Intent provides for a purchase price of all the assets for $10,000, a $10,000 breakup fee if another bid is received, as well as related fees. The major judgment creditor is contesting the proposed sale.

The Company believes that based on the filing of the ABC and the perfection of a judgment claim against All American, it is highly unlikely the Company will have any recovery of its claim.

Note 5 –Significant Accounting Policies

The significant accounting policies are summarized as follows:

Use of Estimates

Management of Monarch has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses, convertible judgment debt payable and shareholder payable approximate their fair market value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments.

SFAS No. 107 requires disclosures about the fair value for all financial instruments, whether or not recognized, for financial statement purposes. Disclosures about fair value of financial instruments are based on pertinent information available to management as of June 30, 2009 and 2008. Accordingly, the estimates presented in these statements are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized on disposition of the financial instruments.

Management has estimated the fair values of cash, accounts payable, and accrued expenses to be approximately their respective carrying values reported on these statements because of their short maturities.

F-9

 

 

MONARCH INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED

JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

Statements of Cash Flows

For the purposes of the statements of cash flows we consider all highly liquid investments purchased with a remaining maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2009, FASB issued FASB Statement No. 165 “Subsequent events” (SFAS No. 165”) to be effective for the interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The objective of this Statement is to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular, this Statement sets forth: 1. The period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements. 2. The circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in it financial statements. 3. The disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The effect of adoption of SFAS No. 165 on the Company’s financial position and results of operations is not expected to be material.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly” (“FSP FAS 157-4”). FSP FAS 157-4 provides guidance on estimating fair value when market activity has decreased and on identifying transactions that are not orderly. Additionally, entities are required to disclose in interim and annual periods the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This FSP is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of FSP FAS 157-4 will have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operation.

In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active,” (“FSP FAS 157-3”), which clarifies application of SFAS 157 in a market that is not active. FSP FAS 157-3 was effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. The adoption of FSP FAS 157-3 had no impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States. SFAS 162 is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Our Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 162 on its financial statements but does not expect it to have a material effect.

Management does not anticipate that the adoption of these standards will have a material impact on the financial statements.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

F-10

 

 

MONARCH INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED

JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

Note 6 – Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

Note 7 - Affiliated Party Debt Transactions

A related party is generally defined as (i) any person that holds 10% or more of the Company’s securities and their immediate families, (ii) the Company’s management, (iii) someone that directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the Company, or (iv) anyone who can significantly influence the financial and operating decisions of the Company. A transaction is considered to be a related party transaction when there is a transfer of resources or obligations between related parties. In the quarter ended March 31, 2006, Strategic Capital Resources, Inc deconsolidated Monarch. See Note 2 - Change of Control.

The Company recorded management fees of $500 per month for the use of office space and for administrative and management services provided by Strategic Capital Resources, Inc. for the period November 3, 2004 through June 30, 2009. In addition a $15,000 fee was recognized to Strategic related to work performed pertaining to the Merger and the related review of the 14C filing.

The loan amount due is payable on demand and bears interest at 12% per annum. Interest is due and added to the payable amount on the first day of each month. Interest was expensed in the amount of $23,235. Management believes that the terms of the loan were made on equal or better terms than were available elsewhere.

Note 8 - Income Taxes

The net operating loss carry forward “NOL” through June 30, 2009 approximates $160,000. In addition there is another $100,235 of interest expense to deduct to due to shareholders once paid as of June 30, 2009. The Company applied the $1,653,462 of debt converted as forgiveness of income for tax purposes, which requires such amount to be applied against the NOL carry over of the prior year pursuant to an insolvency exemption by the internal revenue code. The NOL’s prior to June 30, 2003 are not determinable as it appears the tax returns had not been filed by the prior management for several years. In addition due to the ownership changes over the years under Section 382, we believe the utilization of such NOL’s have been limited. Once we are able to definitively locate or file the missing years of tax returns, we will properly state the NOL’s available for future use.

F-11

 

 

MONARCH INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED

JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, provides for the recognition and measurement of deferred income tax benefits based on the likelihood of their realization in future years. A valuation allowance must be established to reduce deferred income tax benefits if it is more likely than not that, a portion of the deferred income tax benefits will not be realized. Therefore, a valuation allowance equal to the potential deferred tax benefit has been established in full, resulting in no deferred tax benefit as of the balance sheet dates.

The reconciliation of the Company’s effective tax rate differs from the Federal income tax rate of 34% for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, as a result of the following:

The net operating loss carryforward was utilized in full through June 30, 2006 due to the application of the $1,653,462 debt converted to equity in 2006 as debt forgiveness for tax purposes. The Internal Revenue Code insolvency exemption provides for such debt forgiveness income to be applied to the net operating losses carry forward to the extent such net operating losses are available.

Note 9 – Stockholders’ Deficiency

Preferred Stock and Common Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 500,000,000 shares of common stock, $.001 par value, and 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, .01 par value.

Preferred Stock

The preferred stock may be issued in one or more series, with the rights of each series, including voting rights, to be determined by the Board of Directors prior to each issuance to the full extent permitted by Nevada law. No shares of preferred stock have been issued.

F-12

 

 

MONARCH INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED

JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

Common Stock

The common stock may be issued at any time, without stockholder approval and the Board of Directors is able to determine all of the terms of those shares, including but not limited to the following:

The holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on matters on which they are entitled to vote.

At June 30, 2009 there were 16,168,733 shares of common stock outstanding.

Common Stock Purchase Warrant

During the quarter ended September 30, 1997 pursuant to an offshore securities subscription agreement the Company received proceeds of $1,030,500. The Company was obligated to pay Strategic Capital Resources, Inc. a principal payment of $500,000 in accordance with its loan agreement out of the proceeds of the offshore placement. The Company paid Strategic Capital Resources, Inc. $212,500 instead of the $500,000 principal payment due under the loan agreements. In addition, $53,609 of accrued interest was paid. The outstanding loan balance after the $212,500 principal payment was $1,100,000. The Company subsequently defaulted on its loan to SCRI. See Note 11 – Litigation and Note 2 – Change of Control.

During March 2006, the Company issued to Strategic Capital Resources, Inc. a warrant to purchase 1,100,000 shares of common stock at a $.001 per share exercise price as part of the litigation settlement. The warrant term is for seven (7) years, contains anti-dilution provisions, provision that the warrant terms and provisions would not be affected by a reverse stock split as well as registration rights.

Management has valued the common stock warrants at the date of grant utilizing the Black Scholes pricing model. In arriving at their fair value at the date of grant, the Company considered, among other things, historic equity transactions for all classes of its stock, the liquidity of the common stock. The specific assumptions utilized in the Black-Scholes pricing model to calculate the value of the warrants are as follows: stock price of $0.005, exercise price of $0.001, term of 7 years, volatility of 278%, expected dividend yield of 0.00% and a discount rate of 3.8%, As a result of this analysis, the assumed value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant was a valuation of $5,500 being assigned to the common stock warrants which was charged to interest expense and credited to paid-in capital.

There were 1,100,000 common stock warrants available for issuance as of June 30, 2009 and 2008. A summary of the status of the warrants as of June 30, 2009 and 2008 and changes during the years then ended is presented below:

F-13

 

 

MONARCH INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED

JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

The following additional information relates to warrants outstanding as of June 30, 2009:

Note 10 – Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed assuming the exercise or conversion of common stock equivalent shares, if dilutive, consisting of unissued shares under options and warrants. Since the 1,100,000 shares under outstanding warrants and the potential conversion of the $210,354 convertible debt into 2,103,540 shares are both anti-dilutive due to the Company’s net loss, no diluted per share amounts are presented.

Note 11 - Litigation, Claims and Assessments

From time to time in the normal course of business the Company will be involved in litigation. The Company’s management has determined any asserted or unasserted claims to be immaterial to the financial statements.

Iron Eagle Contracting and Mechanical, Inc., etal

During the year ended June 30, 1997, Iron Holding acquired its construction subsidiary, Iron Eagle Contracting and Mechanical, Inc. (“IECM”). Under the terms of the agreement, Iron Holdings purchased the net assets of IECM for a note in the amount of $1,312,500. The note bears interest at the prime rate plus 1%. Interest was payable in monthly installments. The note was secured by all assets of IECM’s parent company, Monarch Investment Properties, Inc. (“Monarch”), which was formerly known as Iron Holdings Corp., and by all of the issued and outstanding shares of IECM.

During June 1999, Strategic Capital Resources, Inc. filed a lawsuit against Monarch, and its subsidiaries, IECM and Tahoe Realty Corp., as well as two of its officers and other individuals, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Queens. The action asserts seven separate causes of action arising out of a default in payment of the remaining $1,100,000 balance due under the promissory note evidencing monies due to Strategic Capital Resources, Inc. from Monarch as a result of its purchase of IECM from the Company.

The Court granted Strategic Capital Resources, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment during March 2000 against Monarch in the sum of $1,100,000 plus interest from January 1, 1999, a judgment of possession of all collateral pledged by Monarch and judgment that the Company is the rightful owner and entitled to immediate possession of the collateral, impressing a trust on said collateral, declaring defendants to be trustees of said collateral and directing said trustees to deliver such collateral to the Company. A decision of the Appellate Division limited the extent of the corporate defendant’s liability and the thrust of the action is against the guarantors.

During fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, the former principals settled the action by payment of $155,000, the entry of a judgment against Monarch in the amount of $1,100,000 plus accrued interest and the surrender of their shares in Monarch to Strategic Capital Resources, Inc. Please see Note 2, Change in Control.

F-14

 

 

MONARCH INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED

JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

During December, 2005, SCRI agreed to convert $1,500,000 of the $1,638,000 judgment it had against Monarch into 15,000,000 shares of the common stock of Monarch. The purpose of the conversion was to make the Monarch “Public Shell” marketable to a potential merger candidate or purchaser. SCRI declared a stock dividend on December 2, 2005 of 15,000,000 shares of Monarch Investment Properties, Inc. common stock payable pro rata to SCRI’s shareholders of record as of December 15, 2005 with a distribution date of December 22, 2005. Monarch and SCRI implemented the conversion and SCRI distributed the shares to its shareholders in March 2006.

At June 30, 2009 and 2008, the judgment payable with accrued interest is $210,354 and $195,707, respectively. The remaining $210,354 of convertible debt and interest is convertible at $0.10 per share. There is no beneficial conversion feature pursuant to EITF 98-5 as the conversion price of such debt was deemed to be at market.

F-15