UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(X) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR ( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from          to         

Commission File Number 0-22491

DIVERSIFIED MULTI-ADVISOR FUTURES FUND L.P. II

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

New York		13-3769020
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

c/o Ceres Managed Futures LLC
55 East 59^th Street — 10th Floor
New York, New York 10022

(Address and Zip Code of principal executive offices)

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:		Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest
		(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  X   No ___

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes ___  No ___

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this form 10-K [X].

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ___		Accelerated filer ___		Non-accelerated filer  X		Smaller reporting company ___
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ___  No  X 

Limited Partnership Redeemable Units with an aggregate value of $28,814,813 were outstanding and held by non-affiliates as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second calendar month.

As of February 28, 2010, 17,948.3664 Limited Partnership Redeemable Units were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

[NONE]

 

 

PART I

Item 1.		Business.

     (a) General Development of Business. Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II (formerly, Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II) (the “Partnership”) is a limited partnership organized on May 10, 1994 under the partnership laws of the State of New York. The Partnership commenced trading operations on January 17, 1996. The Partnership may engage, directly or indirectly, in the speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of commodity interests, including futures contracts, options, swaps and forward contracts. The sectors traded included currencies, energy, grains, indices, metals, softs, livestock, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates. The commodity interests that are traded by the Partnership and the Funds are volatile and involve a high degree of market risk.

     A Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 033-79244) relating to the public offering became effective on August 21, 1995. Beginning August 21, 1995, 100,000 redeemable units of Limited Partnership Interest (“Redeemable Units”) were publicly offered at $1,000 per unit for a period of ninety days, subject to increase for up to an additional sixty days at the sole discretion of the general partner. Between August 21, 1995 (commencement of the offering period) and January 16, 1996, 8,529 Redeemable Units were sold at $1,000 per Redeemable Unit. Proceeds of the offering were held in an escrow account and were transferred, along with the general partner’s contribution of $87,000, to the Partnership’s trading account on January 17, 1996 when the Partnership commenced trading. An additional 100,000 Redeemable Units were registered on a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-03538) effective May 29, 1996 and an additional 150,000 Redeemable Units were registered on a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-25239) effective April 15, 1997. The Partnership no longer offers Redeemable Units for sale. Redemptions of Redeemable Units for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 are reported in the Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital on page F-13 under “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

     Ceres Managed Futures LLC (formerly Citigroup Managed Futures LLC), a Delaware limited liability company, acts as the general partner (the “General Partner”) and commodity pool operator of the Partnership. The General Partner is wholly owned by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Holdings LLC (“MSSB Holdings”), a newly registered non-clearing futures commission merchant and a member of the National Futures Association (“NFA”). Morgan Stanley, indirectly through various subsidiaries, owns 51% of MSSB Holdings. Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“CGM”), the commodity broker and a selling agent for the Partnership, owns 49% of MSSB Holdings. Citigroup Inc. (“Citigroup”), indirectly through various subsidiaries, wholly owns CGM. Prior to July 31, 2009, the date as of which MSSB Holdings became its owner, the General Partner was wholly owned by Citigroup Financial Products Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc., the sole owner of which is Citigroup.

     As of December 31, 2009, all trading decisions are made for the Partnership by Capital Fund Management SA (“CFM”), Willowbridge Associates Inc. (“Willowbridge”), Graham Capital Management L.P. (“Graham”), Eckhardt Trading Company (“Eckhardt”) and SandRidge Capital L.P. (“SandRidge”) (each an “Advisor” and collectively, the “Advisors”). Campbell & Co., Inc. (“Campbell”) was terminated as a trading advisor to the Partnership as of May 31, 2009. SandRidge was added as an Advisor to the Partnership on June 1, 2009. A description of the trading activities and focus of the Advisor is included on page 8 under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The Advisors are not affiliated with one another, are not affiliated with the General Partner or CGM and are not responsible for the organization or operation of the Partnership.

     The General Partner has agreed to make capital contributions, if necessary, so that its General Partnership Interest will be equal to the greater of (i) an amount to entitle it to 1% of each material item of Partnership income, loss, deduction or credit and (ii) the greater of (a) 1% of the partners’ contributions to the Partnership or (b) $25,000. The Partnership will be liquidated upon the first of the following to occur: December 31, 2014; the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit decreases to less than $400 as of the close of any business day; or under certain circumstances as defined in the limited partnership agreement of the Partnership (the “Limited Partnership Agreement”).

     On January 1, 2005, the assets allocated to Campbell for trading were invested in the CMF Campbell Master Fund L.P. (“Campbell Master”), a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York. The Partnership purchased 18,800.3931 units of Campbell Master with cash of $18,587,905 and a contribution of open commodity futures and forward positions

with a fair value of $212,488. Campbell Master was formed in order to permit commodity pools managed now or in the future by Campbell using Campbell’s Financial, Metal and Energy Large Portfolio (“FME”), a proprietary, systematic, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The Partnership fully redeemed its investment in Campbell Master on May 31, 2009 for cash equal to $4,740,726.

     On July 1, 2005, the assets allocated to Willowbridge for trading were invested in the CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P. (“Willowbridge Master”), a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York. The Partnership purchased 10,980.9796 units of Willowbridge Master with cash of $9,895,326 and a contribution of open commodity futures and forward positions with a fair value of $1,085,654. Willowbridge Master was formed in order to permit commodity pools managed now or in the future by Willowbridge using its Argo Trading System, a proprietary, systematic trading system, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the general partner of Willowbridge Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by Willowbridge, including the Partnership are permitted to be limited partners of Willowbridge Master. The General Partner and Willowbridge believe that trading through this structure should promote efficiency and economy in the trading process.

     On April 1, 2006, the assets allocated to Graham for trading were invested in the CMF Graham Capital Master Fund L.P. (“Graham Master”), a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York. The Partnership purchased 11,192.9908 units of Graham Master with cash of $11,192,991. Graham Master was formed in order to permit commodity pools managed now or in the future by Graham using Graham’s K4D-12.5 Program, a proprietary, systematic trading system, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the general partner of Graham Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by Graham, including the Partnership are permitted to be limited partners of Graham Master. The General Partner and Graham believe that trading through this structure should promote efficiency and economy in the trading process.

     On April 1, 2008, the assets allocated to Eckhardt for trading were invested in the CMF Eckhardt Master Fund L.P. (“Eckhardt Master”), a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York. The Partnership purchased 7,000.0000 units of Eckhardt Master with cash of $7,000,000. Eckhardt Master was formed in order to permit commodity pools managed now or in the future by Eckhardt using Eckhardt’s Standard Program, a proprietary, systematic trading system, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the general partner of Eckhardt Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by Eckhardt, including the Partnership, are permitted to be limited partners of Eckhardt Master. The General Partner and Eckhardt believe that trading through this structure should promote efficiency and economy in the trading process.

     On June 1, 2009, the assets allocated to SandRidge for trading were in invested in the CMF SandRidge Master Fund L.P. (“SandRidge Master”), a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York. The Partnership purchased 2,086.0213 units of SandRidge Master with cash of $4,288,986. SandRidge Master was formed in order to permit commodity pools managed now or in the future by using SandRidge’s Energy Program, a proprietary, discretionary trading system, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the general partner of SandRidge Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by SandRidge, including the Partnership, are permitted to be limited partners of SandRidge Master. The General Partner and SandRidge believe that trading through this structure should promote efficiency and economy in the trading process.

     Willowbridge Master’s, Graham Master’s, Eckhardt Master’s and SandRidge Master’s (collectively the “Funds”) and the Partnership’s trading of futures, forwards, swaps and options contracts, if applicable, on commodities is done primarily on United States of America commodity exchanges and foreign commodity exchanges. The Funds and the Partnership engage in such trading through a commodity brokerage account maintained with CGM.

     A Limited Partner may withdraw all or part of their capital contribution and undistributed profits, if any, from the Funds in multiples of the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit of Limited Partnership Interest as of the end of any day (the “Redemption Date”) after a request for redemption has been made to the General Partner at least 3 days in advance of the Redemption Date. The units are classified as a liability when the Limited Partner elects to redeem and informs the Funds.

     Management and incentive fees are charged at the Partnership level. All exchange, clearing, user, give up, floor brokerage and NFA fees (collectively the “clearing fees”) are borne by the Partnership and through its investments in the Funds. All other fees including CGM’s direct brokerage commissions are charged at the Partnership level.

     For the period January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009, the approximate market sector allocation for the Partnership was as follows:

     As of December 31, 2009 the Partnership owned approximately 2.3% 4.6%, 28.5% and 0.6%, of Willowbridge Master, Graham Master, Eckhardt Master and SandRidge Master, respectively. As of December 31, 2008 the Partnership owned approximately 5.9%, 3.4%, 4.7% and 30.7%, of Campbell Master, Willowbridge Master, Graham Master and Eckhardt Master, respectively. The performance of the Partnership is directly affected by the performance of the Funds. Willowbridge, Graham, Eckhardt and SandRidge intend to continue to invest the assets allocated to each by the Partnership in Willowbridge Master, Graham Master, Eckhardt Master and SandRidge Master, respectively. The performance of the Partnership is directly affected by the performance of the Funds. Expenses to investors as a result of the investment in the Funds are approximately the same and redemption rights are not affected.

     The General Partner and each Limited Partner share in the profits and losses of the Partnership in proportion to the amount of partnership interest owned by each except that no Limited Partner shall be liable for obligations of the Partnership in excess of their initial capital contribution and profit, if any, net of distributions.

     Pursuant to the terms of the management agreements (the “Management Agreements”), the Partnership pays each Advisor a monthly management fee equal to 1/6 of 1% (2% per year) of month-end Net Assets allocated to the respective Advisor. Month-end Net Assets for the purpose of calculating management fees are Net Assets, as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement, prior to the reduction of the current month’s incentive fee accruals, the monthly management fees and any redemptions or distributions as of the end of such month. The Management Agreements may be terminated upon notice by either party.

     In addition, the Partnership is obligated to pay each Advisor an incentive fee, payable annually, equal to 20% of the New Trading Profits, as defined in the Management Agreements, earned by each Advisor for the Partnership, except Graham, which will receive an incentive fee of 10% of New Trading Profits on the first $5,000,000 and 20% of New Trading Profits for all such profits in excess of $5,000,000.

     The Partnership has entered into a customer agreement (the “Customer Agreement”) with CGM, which provides that the Partnership pays CGM a monthly brokerage commission equal to 1/2 of 1% (6% per year) of month-end Net Assets allocated to the Advisors, in lieu of brokerage commissions on a per trade basis. Month-end Net Assets for the purpose of calculating commissions are Net Assets, as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement, prior to the reduction of the current month’s brokerage commissions, incentive fee accruals, the monthly management fees and other expenses and any redemptions or distributions as of the end of such month. CGM will pay a portion of its brokerage commissions to financial advisors who have sold Redeemable Units. The Partnership will pay for the clearing fees directly and through its investment in the Funds. Brokerage commissions will be paid for the life of the Partnership, although the rate at which such fees are paid may be changed. All of the Partnership’s assets, not held in the Funds’ accounts at CGM, are deposited in the Partnership’s account at CGM. The Partnership’s cash is deposited by CGM in segregated bank accounts to the extent required by Commodity Futures Trading Commission regulations. CGM has agreed to pay the Partnership interest on 80% of the average daily equity maintained in cash in the Partnership’s (or the Partnership’s allocable portion of a Fund’s) account during each month at a 30-day U.S. Treasury bill rate determined weekly by CGM based on the average non-competitive yield on 3-month U.S. Treasury bills maturing in 30 days from the date on which such weekly rate is determined. CGM will pay such interest to the Partnership out of its own funds whether or not it is able to earn the interest it has obligated itself to pay. Alternatively, CGM may continue to maintain the Partnership’s assets in cash and/or place all the Partnership’s assets in a 90-day Treasury bills and pay the Partnership 80% of the interest (or the Partnership’s allocable share of) earned on the Treasury bills purchased. Twenty percent of the interest earned on Treasury bills purchased may be retained by CGM and/or credited to the General Partner. The Customer Agreement gives the Partnership the legal right to net unrealized gains and losses. The Customer Agreement may be terminated upon notice by either party.

     (b) Financial Information about Industry Segments. The Partnership’s business consists of only one segment, speculative trading of commodity interests. The Partnership does not engage in the sales of goods or services. The Partnership’s net income (loss) from operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005, is set forth under “Item 6. Selected Financial Data.” The Partnership’s Capital as of December 31, 2009, was $31,924,681.

     (c) Narrative Description of Business.

          See Paragraphs (a) and (b) above.

          (i) through (xii) — Not applicable.

          (xiii) — The Partnership has no employees.

     (d) Financial Information about Geographic Areas. The Partnership does not engage in the sales of goods or services or own any long lived assets, and therefore this item is not applicable.

     (e) Available Information. The Partnership does not have an Internet address. The Partnership will provide paper copies of its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to these reports free of charge upon request.

     (f) Reports to Security Holders. Not applicable.

     (g) Enforceability of Civil Liabilities Against Foreign Persons. Not applicable.

     (h) Smaller Reporting Companies. Not applicable.

Item 1A.		Risk Factors.

     As a result of leverage, small changes in the price of the Partnership’s positions may result in major losses.

     The trading of commodity interests is speculative, volatile and involves a high degree of leverage. A small change in the market price of a commodity interest contract can produce major losses for the Partnership. Market prices can be influenced by, among other things, changing supply and demand relationships, governmental, agricultural, commercial and trade programs and policies, national and international political and economic events, weather and climate conditions, insects and plant disease, purchases and sales by foreign countries and changing interest rates.

     An investor may lose all of its investment.

     Due to the speculative nature of trading commodity interests, an investor could lose all of its investment in the Partnership.

     The Partnership will pay substantial fees and expenses regardless of profitability.

     Regardless of its trading performance, the Partnership will incur fees and expenses, including brokerage commissions and management fees. Substantial incentive fees may be paid to one or more of the Advisors even if the Partnership experiences a net loss for the full year.

     An investor’s ability to redeem or transfer Redeemable Units is limited.

     An investor’s ability to redeem Redeemable Units is limited and no market exists for the Redeemable Units.

     Conflicts of interest exist.

     The Partnership is subject to numerous conflicts of interest including those that arise from the facts that:

	1.		The General Partner and commodity broker are affiliates;
	2.		Each of the Advisors, the commodity broker and their principals and affiliates may trade in commodity interests for their own accounts; and
	3.		An investor’s financial advisor will receive ongoing compensation for providing services to the investor’s account.

     Investing in units might not provide the desired diversification of an investor’s overall portfolio.

     The Partnership will not provide any benefit of diversification of an investor’s overall portfolio unless it is profitable and produces returns that are independent from stock and bond market returns.

     Past performance is no assurance of future results.

     The Advisors’ trading strategies may not perform as they have performed in the past. The Advisors have from time to time incurred substantial losses in trading on behalf of clients.

     An investor’s tax liability may exceed cash distributions.

     Investors are taxed on their share of the Partnership’s income, even though the Partnership does not intend to make any distributions.

     The General Partner may allocate the Partnership’s assets to undisclosed advisors.

     The General Partner at any time may select and allocate the Partnership’s assets to undisclosed advisors. Investors may not be advised of such changes in advance. Investors must rely on the ability of the General Partner to select advisors and allocate assets among them.

     Regulatory changes could restrict the Partnership’s operations.

     Regulatory changes could adversely affect the Partnership by restricting its markets or activities, limiting its trading and/or increasing the taxes to which investors are subject. The General Partner is not aware of any definitive regulatory developments that might adversely affect the Partnership; however, since June 2008, several bills have been proposed in the U.S. Congress in response to record energy and agricultural prices and the financial crisis. Some of the pending legislation, if enacted, could impact the manner in which swap contracts are traded and/or settled and limit trading by speculators (such as the Partnership) in futures and over-the-counter markets. One of the proposals would authorize the CFTC and the Commission to regulate swap transactions. Other potentially adverse regulatory initiatives could develop suddenly and without notice.

     Speculative position and trading limits may reduce profitability

     The CFTC and U.S. exchanges have established speculative position limits on the maximum net long or net short positions which any person may hold or control in particular futures and options on futures. The trading instructions of an advisor may have to be modified, and positions held by the Partnership may have to be liquidated in order to avoid exceeding these limits. Such modification or liquidation could adversely affect the operations and profitability of the Partnership by increasing transaction costs to liquidate positions and foregoing potential profits.

Item 2.		Properties.

     The Partnership does not own or lease any properties. The General Partner operates out of facilities provided by its affiliate, Citigroup.

Item 3.		Legal Proceedings.

     This section describes the major pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, to which CGM or its subsidiaries is a party or to which any of their property is subject. There are no material legal proceedings pending against the Partnership or the General Partner.

     CGM is a New York corporation with its principal place of business at 388 Greenwich St., New York, New York 10013. CGM is registered as a broker-dealer and futures commission merchant (“FCM”), and provides futures brokerage and clearing services for institutional and retail participants in the futures markets. CGM and its affiliates also provide investment banking and other financial services for clients worldwide.

     There have been no material administrative, civil or criminal actions within the past five years against CGM (formerly known as Salomon Smith Barney) or any of its individual principals and no such actions are currently pending, except as follows.

     Mutual Funds

     Several issues in the mutual fund industry have come under the scrutiny of federal and state regulators. Citigroup has received subpoenas and other requests for information from various government regulators regarding market timing, financing, fees, sales practices and other mutual fund issues in connection with various investigations. Citigroup is cooperating with all such reviews. Additionally, Citigroup Global Markets has entered into a settlement agreement with the SEC with respect to revenue sharing and sales of classes of funds.

     On May 31, 2005, Citigroup announced that Smith Barney Fund Management LLC and Citigroup Global Markets completed a settlement with the SEC resolving an investigation by the SEC into matters relating to arrangements between certain Smith Barney mutual funds, an affiliated transfer agent and an unaffiliated sub-transfer agent. Under the terms of the settlement, Citigroup agreed to pay fines totaling $208.1 million. The settlement, in which Citigroup neither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing or liability, includes allegations of willful misconduct by Smith Barney Fund Management LLC and Citigroup Global Markets in failing to disclose aspects of the transfer agent arrangements to certain mutual fund investors.

     In May 2007, Citigroup Global Markets finalized its settlement agreement with the NYSE and the New Jersey Bureau of Securities on the matter related to its market-timing practices prior to September 2003.

     FINRA Settlement

     On October 12, 2009, FINRA announced its acceptance of an Award Waiver and Consent (“AWC”) in which Citigroup Global Markets, without admitting or denying the findings, consented to the entry of the AWC and a fine and censure of $600,000. The AWC includes findings that Citigroup Global Markets failed to adequately supervise the activities of its equities trading desk in connection with swap and related hedge trades in U.S. and Italian equities that were designed to provide certain perceived tax advantages. Citigroup Global Markets was charged with failing to provide for effective written procedures with respect to the implementation of the trades, failing to monitor Bloomberg messages and failing to properly report certain of the trades to the NASDAQ.

     Auction Rate Securities

     On May 31, 2006, the SEC instituted and simultaneously settled proceedings against Citigroup Global Markets and 14 other broker-dealers regarding practices in the Auction Rate Securities market. The SEC alleged that the broker-dealers violated Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. The broker-dealers, without admitting or denying liability, consented to the entry of an SEC cease-and-desist order providing for censures, undertakings and penalties. Citigroup Global Markets paid a penalty of $1.5 million.

     On August 7, 2008, Citigroup reached a settlement with the New York Attorney General, the SEC, and other state regulatory agencies, pursuant to which Citigroup agreed to offer to purchase at par Auction Rate Securities from all Citigroup individual investors, small institutions (as defined by the terms of the settlement), and charities that purchased Auction Rate Securities from Citigroup prior to February 11, 2008. In addition, Citigroup agreed to pay a $50 million fine to the State of New York and a $50 million fine to the other state regulatory agencies.

     Subprime-Mortgage Related Actions

     Citigroup and certain of its affiliates are subject to formal and informal investigations, as well as subpoenas and/or requests for information, from various governmental and self-regulatory agencies relating to subprime mortgage—related activities. Citigroup and its affiliates are cooperating fully and are engaged in discussions on these matters.

     Credit Crisis Related Matters

     Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2007, certain of Citigroup’s, and Citigroup Global Market’s regulators and other state and federal government agencies commenced formal and informal investigations and inquiries, and issued subpoenas and requested information, concerning Citigroup’s subprime mortgage-related conduct and business activities. Citigroup and certain of its affiliates, including Citigroup Global Markets, are involved in discussions with certain of its regulators to resolve certain of these matters.

     Certain of these regulatory matters assert claims for substantial or indeterminate damages. Some of these matters already have been resolved, either through settlements or court proceedings, including the complete dismissal of certain complaints or the rejection of certain claims following hearings.

     In the course of its business, CGM, as a major futures commission merchant and broker-dealer, is a party to various civil actions, claims and routine regulatory investigations and proceedings that the general partner believes do not have a material effect on the business of CGM.

Item 4.		[Removed and Reserved]

PART II

Item 5.		Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

	(a)		Market Information. The Partnership has issued no stock. There is no public market for the Redeemable Units.
	(b)		Holders. The number of holders of Redeemable Units as of December 31, 2009 was 1,244.
	(c)		Dividends. The Partnership did not declare a distribution in 2009 or 2008. The Partnership does not intend to declare distributions in the foreseeable future.
	(d)		Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans. None.
	(e)		Performance Graph. Not applicable.
	(f)		Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities. There were no additional sales of Redeemable Units during the twelve months ended December 31, 2009. There were no additional sales of Redeemable Units during the twelve months ended December 31, 2008. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 there were General Partner contributions representing the sale of 1,008.7668 General Partner Unit equivalents totaling $1,441,407. The Redeemable Units were issued in reliance upon applicable exemptions from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 506 of Regulation D promulgated there under. The Redeemable Units were purchased by accredited investors as described in Regulation D.
			Proceeds from the sale of additional Redeemable Units are used in the trading of commodity interests including, if applicable, futures contracts, options and forward contracts.
	(g)		Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers.

The following chart sets forth the purchases of Redeemable Units by the Partnership.

Item 6.		Selected Financial Data.

     Net realized and unrealized trading gains, interest income, net income, increase in Net Asset Value per Unit and Net Asset Value per Unit for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 and total assets at December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:

		2009				2008				2007				2006				2005
Net realized and unrealized trading gains (losses) and investment in partnerships net of brokerage commissions (including clearing fees) of $2,563,903, $3,078,391, $3,463,859, $3,924,799 and $4,178,058, respectively		$	(1,773,665	)		$	6,859,644			$	2,568,991			$	1,287,348			$	1,456,152
Total interest income			27,089				487,555				1,744,958				2,080,286				1,356,172
		$	(1,746,576	)		$	7,347,199			$	4,313,949			$	3,367,634			$	2,812,324
Net income (loss)		$	(2,993,465	)		$	5,721,768			$	2,911,097			$	1,567,049			$	605,508
Increase (decrease) in Net Asset Value per Unit		$	(142.43	)		$	215.30			$	92.67			$	42.26			$	25.88
Net Asset Value per Unit		$	1,724.57			$	1,867.00			$	1,651.70			$	1,559.03			$	1,516.77
Total assets		$	32,598,591			$	45,718,234			$	49,039,808			$	53,906,145			$	59,855,686

Item 7.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Overview

     The Partnership, directly and through its investment in other partnerships, seeks to achieve substantial capital appreciation through speculative trading, directly and indirectly, in U.S. and international markets for currencies, interest rates, stock indices, agricultural and energy products and precious and base metals. The Partnership may employ futures, swaps, options on futures, and forward contracts in those markets.

     The General Partner manages all business of the Partnership. The General Partner has delegated its responsibility for the investment of the Partnership’s assets to the Advisors. The General Partner employs a team of approximately 20 professionals whose primary emphasis is on attempting to maintain quality control among the advisors to the partnerships operated or managed by the General Partner. A full-time staff of due diligence professionals use state-of-the-art technology and on-site evaluations to monitor new and existing futures money managers. The accounting and operations staff provide processing of trading activity and reporting to limited partners and regulatory authorities. In selecting the Advisors for the Partnership, the General Partner considered past performance, trading style, volatility of markets traded and fee requirements.

     Responsibilities of the General Partner include:

	•		due diligence examinations of the Advisors;
	•		selection, appointment and termination of the Advisors;
	•		negotiation of the Management Agreements; and
	•		monitoring the activity of the Advisors.

     In addition, the General Partner prepares the books and records and provides the administrative and compliance services that are required by law or regulation from time to time in connection with operation of the Partnership. These services include the preparation of required books and records and reports to limited partners, government agencies and regulators; computation of net asset value; calculation of fees; effecting subscriptions, redemptions and limited partner communications; and preparation of offering documents and sales literature.

     The General Partner seeks the best prices and services available in its commodity futures brokerage transactions.

     The programs traded by each Advisor on behalf of the Partnership are: CFM — Discus Program (“Discus”), Graham — K4D-12.5 Program, Willowbridge — Argo Trading System, and Eckhardt — Standard Program. As of December 31, 2009, the Partnership’s assets were allocated among the Advisors in the following approximate percentages: SandRidge, 14%, CFM, 31%, Graham, 25%, Willowbridge, 15% and Eckhardt, 15%.

     No assurance is given that an Advisor’s trading program will be profitable or that it will not experience losses.

Campbell & Company, Inc.

     Campbell traded its FME Large Portfolio for the Partnership a systematic, proprietary trading program. Campbell’s trading models are designed to detect and exploit medium-term to long-term price changes, while also applying risk management and portfolio management principles.

     Campbell believes that utilizing multiple trading models provides an important level of diversification, and is most beneficial when multiple contracts of each market are traded. Every trading model may not trade every market. It is possible that one trading model may signal a long position while another trading model signals a short position in the same market. It is Campbell’s intention to offset those signals to reduce unnecessary trading, but if the signals are not simultaneous, both trades will be taken and since it is unlikely that both positions would prove profitable, in retrospect, one or both trades will appear to have been unnecessary. It is Campbell’s policy to follow trades signaled by each trading model independently of the other models.

     Campbell was terminated as a trading advisor to the Partnership as of May 31, 2009.

Capital Fund Management SA

     CFM will trade the Partnership’s assets allocated to it in accordance with its Discus Program, a systematic, proprietary trading program. All of the trading decisions result from proprietary trading and risk management programs developed by CFM. The Discus Program is 100% statistical and systematic in nature. The only information fed into the system are historical price statistics. The system does not use any form of qualitative information and, most importantly, the system is never overridden by human opinion. The program continuously applies proprietary filters to review price data in an attempt to select the most efficient trading strategy with respect to a particular time frame (short, medium or long term), contracts traded, contract and market sector concentration and risk exposure. The Discus Program trades more than 50 types of futures contracts on exchanges around the world.

Graham Capital Management, L.P.

     Graham trades its K4D-12.5 Program on behalf of Graham Master. The K4D-12.5 Program allocates assets equally among four other distinct Graham trading programs.

     Graham trades actively in both U.S. and foreign markets, primarily in futures contracts, forward contracts, spot contracts and associated derivative instruments such as options and swaps. Graham engages in exchange for physical transactions, which involve the exchange of a futures position for the underlying physical commodity without making an open competitive trade on an exchange. Graham at times will trade certain instruments, such as forward foreign currency contracts, as a substitute for futures or options traded on futures exchanges.

     Graham’s trading systems are systematic and rely primarily on technical rather than fundamental information as the basis for their trading decisions. Graham’s systems are based on the expectation that over time they can successfully anticipate market events using quantitative mathematical models to determine their trading activities, as opposed to attempting to properly forecast price trends using subjective analysis of supply and demand.

     Graham trades the Partnership’s assets allocated to it in accordance with the K4D-12.5 Program, which combines four individual Graham investment programs into one program. K4D-12.5 Program initially allocates assets equally among other Graham programs. As market conditions or other circumstances change, Graham may alter the weightings of the individual programs and add (or delete) other programs to K4D-12.5 Program as it deems appropriate.

Willowbridge Associates, Inc.

     Willowbridge trades the Partnership’s assets allocated to it in accordance with its Select Investment Program, whereby the General Partner determined the initial allocation of the Partnership’s assets among one or more of Willowbridge’s strategies and may determine subsequent reallocations (if any). Of the Partnership’s assets allocated to Willowbridge, 0% is currently traded using the Vulcan Trading System (“Vulcan”) and 100% is currently traded using the Argo Trading System (“Argo”), each of which is described below.

     For each of these systems, risk is managed on a market by market level as well as on an overall portfolio level. On the market level, risk is managed primarily by utilizing proprietary volatility filters. When these filters detect a certain excessive level of volatility in the markets traded, they will signal that the systems should no longer be trading in the markets in which the filters have detected excessive volatility. In this way, the systems do not participate in markets in which there are extremes in market action. On the portfolio level, risk is managed by utilizing a proprietary portfolio cutback rule. When cumulative profits have reached a certain level, this rule determines that positions should be halved across the entire portfolio. In this way, risk is reduced while allowing the systems to continue to participate in the markets, albeit at a reduced level. After the portfolio has been traded at half, the portfolio cutback rule will then determine when to increase positions to again trade at the full level.

     The Vulcan Trading System, which commenced trading in 1988, is a computerized technical trading system. It is not a trend-following system, but does ride a trend when the opportunity arises. Vulcan uses the concepts of pattern recognition, support/resistance levels, and counter-trend liquidations (as defined below) in making trading decisions. In effect, Vulcan is more akin to a systematic technical charting system, as opposed to most computer systems which are based on pure trend-following calculations.

     Vulcan is based on general technical trading principles. It applies these principles to a diversified portfolio of commodities and currencies. Given that the system is based on general principles, the system parameters used are the same for all items in the portfolio and are not optimized. In this manner, the Vulcan System minimizes the problem of data-fitting.

     Argo commenced trading in 1988. Argo essentially incorporates Vulcan’s concepts of pattern recognition, support/resistance levels and counter-trend liquidations (as defined below) to trade a portfolio similar to Vulcan. However, Argo has a relatively slower time horizon than Vulcan and attempts to capture longer-term price moves.

     Pattern recognition, support/resistance levels and counter-trend liquidations are defined as follows:

     Pattern recognition is the ability to identify patterns that appear to have acted as precursors of price advances or declines in the past.

     A support level is a previous low — a price level under the current market price at which point buying interest is expected to be sufficiently strong to overcome selling pressure.

     A resistance level is a previous high — a price level over the current market price at which point selling pressure is expected to overcome buying pressure and a price advance is expected to be turned back.

     A counter-trend liquidation is the closing out of a position after a significant price move on the assumption that the market is due for a correction.

Eckhardt Trading Company

     Eckhardt began managing accounts according to the Standard Program — Higher Leveraged in October 1991, a systematic proprietory trading program For this program, Eckhardt primarily engages in trading financial and commodity futures contracts on U.S. and non-U.S. exchanges. Currently the market groups of contracts traded by Eckhardt in the Standard Program-Higher Leveraged include, but are not limited to, U.S. and international interest rates, stock indices, currencies and cross-rates, metals, energy products, grains and soft markets. Eckhardt may add or delete markets and/or exchanges at its discretion. In addition, Eckhardt may trade options on futures, forward contracts on commodities and currencies, cash currencies, and may engage in transactions in physical commodities, including EFPs (in addition to EFPs in currencies).

     Eckhardt’s trading approach is the product of over 28 years of intensive research on futures price action, risk management and trading system development. Diverse systems are melded in accordance with the modern mathematical theory of risk. The systems are technical in origin and trend following in thrust. They are not based on the analysis of fundamental supply and demand factors. Eckhardt’s trading approach is predominantly applied in an algorithmic or mechanical manner. Occasionally, discretion and judgment may be used; such discretion is nonetheless informed by investigations into historical price action and is often employed for risk management purposes. Discretion also may be utilized in connection with the timing of the entry of orders in the markets traded.

SandRidge Capital, L.P.

     SandRidge trades its Energy Program on behalf of the Partnership, through its investment in SandRidge Master. SandRidge primarily attempts to achieve the Fund’s objective through the speculative trading of energy-related commodity interests, including, but not limited to natural gas, crude oil, heating oil and gasoline.

     SandRidge is a discretionary trader that employs primarily fundamental analysis. Fundamental analysis examines factors external to the trading market that affect the supply and demand for a particular group or type of commodity in order to predict future prices. While SandRidge relies heavily on fundamental research to develop its overall point of view, it also employs technical analysis in its trading to help determine entry and exit points.

     Effective risk management is an important aspect of SandRidge’s trading program. An account’s size, volatility of the market traded and the nature of other positions taken are all factors used in deciding whether to initiate a position and in determining the amount of equity committed to that position.

     For the period January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009, the average allocation by commodity market sector for each of the Funds was as follows:

CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund

Currencies			23.4	%
Energy			17.8	%
Grains			8.3	%
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			16.6	%
Interest Rates U.S.			9.5	%
Livestock			0.4	%
Metals			18.1	%
Softs			5.9	%

CMF Graham Master Fund L.P.

Currencies			26.1	%
Energy			6.8	%
Grains			4.0	%
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			16.9	%
Interest Rates U.S.			6.3	%
Indices			29.8	%
Livestock			0.4	%
Metals			5.2	%
Softs			4.5	%

CMF SandRidge Master L.P.

Energy			100.0	%

CMF Eckhardt Master Fund L.P.

Currencies			13.4	%
Energy			9.5	%
Grains			5.8	%
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			23.6	%
Interest Rates U.S.			14.1	%
Indices			13.6	%
Metals			12.7	%
Softs			7.3	%

CMF Capital Fund Management Master Fund L.P.

Currencies			21.1	%
Energy			8.2	%
Grains			1.8	%
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			14.2	%
Interest Rates U.S.			12.5	%
Indices			38.2	%
Livestock			0.2	%
Metals			1.6	%
Softs			2.2	%

(a) Liquidity.

     The Partnership does not engage in sales of goods or services. The Partnership’s assets are (i) its investments in the Funds, (ii) equity in its trading account, consisting of cash and cash equivalents, net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts, net unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts and (iii) interest receivable. Because of the low margin deposits normally required in commodity futures trading, relatively small price movements may result in substantial losses to the Partnership. While substantial losses could lead to a material decrease in liquidity, no such illiquidity occurred during the year ended December 31, 2009.

     To minimize the risk relating to low margin deposits, the Partnership follows certain trading policies, including:

	(i)		The Partnership/Funds invests their assets only in commodity interests that an Advisor believes are traded in sufficient volume to permit ease of taking and liquidating positions. Sufficient volume, in this context, refers to a level of liquidity that the Advisor believes will permit it to enter and exit trades without noticeably moving the market.
	(ii)		An Advisor will initiate additional positions in any commodity interest if these positions would result in aggregate positions requiring a margin of more than 66 2/3% of the Partnership’s net assets allocated to that Advisor.
	(iii)		The Partnership/Funds may occasionally accept delivery of a commodity. Unless such delivery is disposed of promptly by retendering the warehouse receipt representing the delivery to the appropriate clearinghouse, the physical commodity position is fully hedged.

	(iv)		The Partnership/Funds will not employ the trading technique commonly known as “pyramiding,” in which the speculator uses unrealized profits on existing positions as margin for the purchases or sale of additional positions in the same or related commodities.
	(v)		The Partnership/Funds will not utilize borrowings, other than short-term borrowings, if the Partnership takes delivery of any cash commodities.
	(vi)		The Advisors may, from time to time, employ trading strategies such as spreads or straddles on behalf of the Partnership. Spreads and “straddles” describe a commodity futures trading strategy involving the simultaneous buying and selling of futures contracts on the same commodity but involving different delivery dates or markets and in which the trader expects to earn a profit from a widening or narrowing of the difference between the prices of the two contracts.
	(vii)		The Partnership/Funds will not permit the churning of its commodity trading account. The term “churning” refers to the practice of entering and exiting trades with a frequency unwarranted by legitimate efforts to profit from the trades, driven by the desire to generate commission income.

     From January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009, the Partnership’s average margin to equity ratio (i.e., the percentage of assets on deposit required for margin) was approximately 9.6%. The foregoing margin to equity ratio takes into account cash held in the Partnership’s name, as well as the allocable value of the positions and cash held on behalf of the Partnership in the name of the Funds.

     In the normal course of business, the Partnership and the Funds are parties to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments. These financial instruments include forwards, futures, options and swaps, whose values are based upon an underlying asset, index or reference rate, and generally represent future commitments to exchange currencies or cash balances, or to purchase or sell other financial instruments at specified terms at specified future dates, or, in the case of derivative commodity instruments, to have a reasonable possibility to be settled in cash, through physical delivery or with another financial instrument. These instruments may be traded on an exchange or over-the-counter (“OTC”). Exchange traded instruments are standardized and include futures and certain forwards and option contracts. OTC contracts are negotiated between contracting parties and include swaps and certain forwards and option contracts. Each of these instruments is subject to various risks similar to those relating to the underlying financial instruments including market and credit risk. In general, the risks associated with OTC contracts are greater than those associated with exchange traded instruments because of the greater risk of default by the counterparty to an OTC contract.

     Market risk is the potential for changes in the value of the financial instruments traded by the Partnership/Funds due to market changes, including interest and foreign exchange rate movements and fluctuations in commodity or security prices. Market risk is directly impacted by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the related underlying assets are traded. The Partnership/Funds are exposed to a market risk equal to the value of futures, options and forward contracts purchased and unlimited liability on such contracts sold short.

     Credit risk is the possibility that a loss may occur due to the failure of a counterparty to perform according to the terms of a contract. The Partnership’s/Funds’ risk of loss in the event of a counterparty default is typically limited to the amounts recognized in the Statements of Financial Condition and not represented by the contract or notional amounts of the instruments. The Partnership’s/Funds’ risk of loss is reduced through the use of legally enforceable master netting agreements with counterparties that permit the Partnership/Funds to offset unrealized gains and losses and other assets and liabilities with such counterparties upon the occurrence of certain events. The Partnership/Funds have credit risk and concentration risk as the sole counterparty or broker with respect to the Partnership’s/Funds’ assets is CGM or a CGM affiliate. Credit risk with respect to exchange-traded instruments is reduced to the extent that through CGM, the Partnership’s/Funds’ counterparty is an exchange or clearing organization.

     As both a buyer and seller of options, the Partnership/Funds pay or receive a premium at the outset and then bear the risk of unfavorable changes in the price of the contract underlying the option. Written options expose the Partnership/Funds to potentially unlimited liability; for purchased options the risk of loss is limited to the premiums paid. Certain written put options permit cash settlement and do not require the option holder to own the reference asset. The Partnership/Funds do not consider these contracts to be guarantees as described in ASC 460, Guarantees (formerly, FAS No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees”).

     The General Partner monitors and attempts to control the Partnership’s/Funds’ risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring systems, and accordingly, believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Partnership/Funds may be subject. These monitoring systems generally allow the General Partner to statistically analyze actual trading results with risk adjusted performance indicators and correlation statistics. In addition, on-line monitoring systems provide account analysis of futures, forwards and options positions by sector, margin requirements, gain and loss transactions and collateral positions. (See also “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further information on financial instrument risk included in the Notes to Financial Statements.)

     Other than the risks inherent in commodity trading, the Partnership knows of no trends, demands, commitments, events or uncertainties which will result in or which are reasonably likely to result in the Partnership’s liquidity increasing or decreasing in any material way. The Limited Partnership Agreement provides that the General Partner may, in its discretion, cause the Partnership to cease trading operations and liquidate all open positions upon the first to occur of the following: (i) December 31, 2014; (ii) the vote to dissolve the Partnership by limited partners owning more than 50% of the Redeemable Units; (iii) assignment by the General Partner of all of its interest in the Partnership or withdrawal, removal, bankruptcy or any other event that causes the General Partner to cease to be a General Partner under the New York Revised Limited Partnership Act unless the Partnership is continued as described in the Limited Partnership Agreement; (iv) Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit falls to less than $400 as of the end of any trading day; or (v) the occurrence of any event which shall make it unlawful for the existence of the Partnership to be continued.

(b)

Capital Resources.

     (i) The Partnership has made no material commitments for capital expenditures.

     (ii) The Partnership’s capital consists of the capital contributions of the partners as increased or decreased by gains or losses on trading and by expenses, interest income, redemptions of Redeemable Units and distributions of profits, if any. Gains or losses on trading cannot be predicted. Market movements in commodities are dependent upon fundamental and technical factors which the Advisors may or may not be able to identify, such as changing supply and demand relationships, weather, government, agricultural, commercial and trade programs and policies, national and international political and economic events and changes in interest rates. Partnership expenses consist of, among other things, brokerage, advisory fees. The level of these expenses is dependent upon the trading performance and the level of Net Assets maintained. In addition, the amount of interest income payable by CGM is dependent upon interest rates over which the Partnership has no control.

     No forecast can be made as to the level of redemptions in any given period. A Limited Partner may require the Partnership to redeem their Redeemable Units at their Net Asset Value as of the last day of a month on ten days’ written notice to the General Partner. There is no fee charged to Limited Partners in connection with redemptions. Redemptions generally are funded out of the Partnership’s cash holdings. For the year ended December 31, 2009, 4,791.9817 Redeemable Units were redeemed totaling $8,665,241 and 474.2765 General Partner Unit equivalents totaling $809,941. For the year ended December 31, 2008, 3,781.8183 Redeemable Units were redeemed totaling $6,739,448. For the year ended December 31, 2007, 5,971.8541 Redeemable Units were redeemed totaling $9,429,938.

(c) Results of Operations.

     For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit decreased 7.6% from $1,867.00 to $1,724.57. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit increased 13.0% from $1,651.70 to $1,867.00. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit increased 5.9% from $1,559.03 to $1,651.70.

     The Partnership experienced a net trading gain of $790,238 before brokerage commissions and related expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009. Gains were primarily attributable to the Partnership’s and the Funds’ trading of currencies, indices, metals and softs and were partially offset by the losses in energy, grains, livestock and U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates.

     2009 was a volatile year for the financial markets. The U.S. stock market entered 2009 reeling from the financial turmoil of 2008. The results of the sub-prime fallout, bank bailouts, auto industry bankruptcies, and capitulating economic data overwhelmed not just stock prices, but fueled extraordinarily high levels of risk aversion. The market’s recovery was driven by stability in the banking sector and a rapid recovery in global markets. By mid-year 2009, the market had hit bottom in March, banks were seeking to return TARP bailout money and other leading indicators were recovering. The Partnership realized losses due to volatile trends. The volatility was due to sensitivity to news shocks and contrary economic data.

     High levels of volatility created difficult trading conditions in the energy markets. On one hand, the weakness in the U.S. dollar is supportive of the higher prices in energy. However, the decline in demand and excess inventories periodically push prices lower, resulting in losses for the sector as prices whipsawed. Losses were realized in trading fixed income instruments. With the economic backdrop of 2009, yields started to exhibit asymmetric volatility due to extreme uncertainty prevailing in the longer time horizon. Encouraged by the continuing efforts of the Obama administration to stabilize the U.S. economy, the markets finally began to recover a degree of risk-taking confidence in March, resulting in the reversal of many of the trends that had driven returns in late 2008. In agricultural commodities, losses were realized primarily in corn and wheat. Prices of corn and wheat both unexpectedly rallied in October as cold, wet weather threatened to delay harvest and concerns over the acres likely to be seeded for the new crop.

     The Partnership experienced a net trading gain of $9,938,035 before brokerage commissions and related expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008. Gains were primarily attributable to the Partnership’s and the Funds’ trading of currencies, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates, livestock, energy, grains, metals and indices and were partially offset by the losses in softs.

     In 2008, the liquidity crisis that began in 2007 rapidly spread to all corners of the globe, significantly pushing down global economic growth and presenting the U.S. economy with the hardest challenges since the Great Depression. During the year, the world’s credit markets virtually seized up, commodity prices plunged and most major equity indices declined dramatically, while some of the largest U.S. financial institutions were under pressure. Faced with unprecedented rapid deterioration in economic data and outlook, and fearing a snowball adverse effect of the credit crunch, global central banks reacted with aggressive campaigns of interest rate cuts and coordinated capital injections. As the markets re-priced the cost of risk, several strong trends emerged. The Partnership strongly capitalized on the trends and was profitable in almost every sector.

     Profits were primarily realized from trading in energy, fixed income and equity indices. The Partnership realized most of the profits in the energy sector by capturing both the bullish and the bearish trends. In the earlier part of the year, crude oil pushed towards a historic high of $147 per barrel and in the latter part, the trend suddenly reversed and a strong negative trend emerged with crude oil dropping to about $32 per barrel. Natural gas also contributed to profits as prices plunged from $14 to about $5 per mmbtu. The Partnership was also profitable in interest rates as the yield on short term notes dropped significantly. Short term U.S. Treasury bills were in such high demand due to flight-to-quality that the yields had dropped below zero during the year. While the 10Yr T-bill yielded on an average between 3.5%-4% most of the year, the yield dropped to 2% in December. Non-U.S. interest rates also showed tremendous volatility as the rates dropped precipitously due to the actions of the central banks. Global equity indices also contributed to the gains as indices continued to test multi-year lows. As financial institutions continued to write off the assets and as bankruptcies loomed, investors lost confidence in the equity markets. Futures markets offered greater flexibility as the SEC temporarily banned short selling in the equity markets. Slightly offsetting gains were small losses in soft commodities such as coffee and cocoa.

     Interest income on 80% of the average daily equity maintained in cash in the Partnership’s (or the Partnership’s allocable portion of a Fund’s) brokerage account was earned at the 30-day U.S. Treasury bill rate determined weekly by CGM based on the average non-competitive yield on 3-month U.S. Treasury bills maturing in 30 days. CGM may continue to maintain the Partnership’s assets in cash and/or place all of the Partnership’s (or a Fund’s) assets in 90-day Treasury bills and pay the Partnership 80% on the interest (or the Partnership’s allocable Share thereof) earned on the Treasury bills purchased. Twenty percent of the interest earned on Treasury bills purchased may be retained by CGM and/or credited to the General Partner. Interest income for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2009 decreased by $12,683 and $460,466, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2008. This decrease was due to lower daily equity average maintained in cash and lower U.S. Treasury bill rates during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2008. Interest earned by the Partnership will increase the net asset value of the Partnership. The amount of interest income earned by the Partnership depends on the average daily equity in the Partnership’s and the Fund’s accounts and upon interest rates over which neither the Partnership nor CGM has control.

     Brokerage commissions are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership’s net asset value as of the last day of each month and are affected by trading performance and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be compared in relation to the fluctuations in the monthly net asset values. Brokerage commissions and fees for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2009 decreased by $172,540 and 514,488, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2008. The decrease in brokerage commissions and fees is due to lower average net assets during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2008.

     Management fees are calculated on the portion of the Partnership’s net asset value allocated to each Advisor at the end of the month and are affected by trading performance and redemptions. Management fees for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2009 decreased by $59,051 and $176,109, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2008. The decrease in management fees is due to lower average net assets during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2008.

     Incentive fees are based on the new trading profits generated by each Advisor as defined in the advisory agreements between the Partnership, the General Partner and each Advisor. Trading performance for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2009 resulted in incentive fees of $0 and $331,108, respectively. Trading performance for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2008 resulted in incentive fees of $136,374 and $527,587, respectively.

     The Partnership experienced a net trading gain of $6,032,850 before brokerage commissions and related expenses for the year ended December 31, 2007. Gains were primarily attributable to the Partnership’s/Funds’ trading of currencies, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates, livestock, energy, grains and indices and were partially offset by the losses incurred in the trading of metals and softs.

     During 2007, the Partnership profited from macro-economic developments that stimulated volatility and asset price trends of a favorable duration to the underlying advisor’s trading strategies. Negative developments in the U.S. mortgage markets and the increasing probability of recession resonated throughout the capital and commodity markets. A surge in volatility in the global equity markets in February was driven by a tumble in Chinese stock valuations that curbed sentiment for global risk assets and sparked a material sell-off in global stock prices. The year would go on to be highlighted by two additional measurable equity market corrections in the summer and fall. By mid-summer, dislocations in U.S. asset-backed and mortgage-backed credit markets emerged as the central focal point of global capital markets. The ensuing re-pricing of credit risk resulted in a flight-to-quality driven rally in prices of sovereign debt, especially in the U.S. Treasury markets as the Federal Open Market Committee acted rapidly to stem the negative implications for growth. As a result of the series of rate cuts and negative economic data, the U.S. dollar became less attractive and weakened materially against most major currencies during the latter part of the year. Commodity markets continued to signal inflation, further clouding the economic landscape, as global demand for most food and raw materials continued to be robust. Prices moved rather erratically at times.

     In agricultural market trading, gains were earned in wheat and the soybean complex as prices rallied considerably on reductions in supply expectations. Profits were realized in fixed income trading as turbulence in asset backed credit markets became a catalyst for significant directional moves in yields and strong bias towards price rallies across Treasury curves. Gains were also generated by substantially rising oil prices, which reached all-time contract highs due to robust global demand, ongoing geopolitical concerns and increased speculative participation in the commodity.

     Trading gains were offset slightly by losses related to trading in metals, equity indices, and soft commodities. Periodic sporadic rallies in the U.S. dollar negatively impacted positions in certain precious metals, which tend to demonstrate inverse price movements. Prices of industrial metals also moved erratically during most of the year, mainly due to fluctuating estimates of Chinese and emerging market economic growth resulting in unfavorable price action for the advisors. Global equity indices, which had reached multi-year highs during mid-July, experienced sharp reversals as investor sentiment waned and rendered losses for the sector. Losses were also experienced in trading soft commodities such as coffee and cocoa. Excess exports from growers in Africa and Indonesia in the month of August resulted in a surprising fall in process driven by increased supply.

     In the General Partner’s opinion, the Advisors continue to employ trading methods and produce results consistent with the objectives of the Partnership and expectations for the Advisors’ programs. The General Partner continues to monitor the Advisors’ performance on a daily, weekly, monthly and annual basis to assure these objectives are met.

     It should be noted that commodity markets are highly volatile. Broad price fluctuations and rapid inflation increase the risks involved in commodity trading, but also increase the possibility of profit. The profitability of the Partnership depends on the existence of major price trends and the ability of the Advisors to identify those price trends correctly. Price trends are influenced by, among other things, changing supply and demand relationships, weather, governmental, agricultural, commercial and trade programs and policies, national and international political and economic events and changes in interest rates. To the extent that market trends exist and the Advisors are able to identify them, the Partnership expects to increase capital through operations.

     In allocating the assets of the Partnership among the trading advisors, the General Partner considers past performance, trading style, volatility of markets traded and fee requirements. The General Partner may modify or terminate the allocation of assets among the trading advisors and may allocate the assets to additional advisors at any time.

(d)		Off-balance Sheet Arrangements. None
(e)		Contractual Obligations. None
(f)		Operational Risk.

     The Partnership/Funds are directly exposed to market risk and credit risk, which arise in the normal course of its business activities. Slightly less direct, but of critical importance, are risks pertaining to operational and back office support. This is particularly the case in a rapidly changing and increasingly global environment with increasing transaction volumes and an expansion in the number and complexity of products in the marketplace.

     Such risks include:

     Operational/Settlement Risk — the risk of financial and opportunity loss and legal liability attributable to operational problems, such as inaccurate pricing of transactions, untimely trade execution, clearance and/or settlement, or the inability to process large volumes of transactions. The Partnership/Funds are subject to increased risks with respect to their trading activities in emerging markets, where clearance, settlement, and custodial risks are often greater than in more established markets.

     Technological Risk — the risk of loss attributable to technological limitations or hardware failure that constrain the Partnership’s ability to gather, process, and communicate information efficiently and securely, without interruption, to customers and in the markets where the Partnership/Funds participate.

     Legal/Documentation Risk — the risk of loss attributable to deficiencies in the documentation of transactions (such as trade confirmations) and customer relationships (such as master netting agreements) or errors that result in noncompliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements.

     Financial Control Risk — the risk of loss attributable to limitations in financial systems and controls. Strong financial systems and controls ensure that assets are safeguarded, that transactions are executed in accordance with management’s authorization, and that financial information utilized by management and communicated to external parties, including the Partnership’s/Funds’ Redeemable Unit holders, creditors, and regulators, is free of material errors.

(g) Critical Accounting Policies.

     Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements and accompanying notes in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. In making these estimates and assumptions, management has considered the effects, if any, of events occurring after the date of the Partnership’s Statements of Financial Condition through the date the financial statements were issued. As a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.

     Statement of Cash Flows. The Partnership is not required to provide a Statement of Cash Flows as permitted by ASC 230, Statement of Cash Flows (formerly, FAS No. 102, “Statement of Cash Flows Exemption of Certain Enterprises and Classification of Cash Flows from Certain Securities Acquired for Resale”).

     Partnership’s and the Funds Investments. All commodity interests (including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments) are held for trading purposes. The commodity interests are recorded on trade date and open contracts are recorded at fair value (as described below) at the measurement date. Investments in commodity interests denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars

at the exchange rates prevailing at the measurement date. Gains or losses are realized when contracts are liquidated. Unrealized gains or losses on open contracts are included as a component of equity in commodity futures trading account on the Statements of Financial Condition. Realized gains or losses and any change in net unrealized gains or losses from the preceding period are reported in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

     Partnership’s and the Funds Fair Value Measurements. The Partnership and the Funds adopted ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (formerly, FAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”) as of January 1, 2008 which defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Partnership did not apply the deferral allowed by ASC 820 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

     The Partnership and the Funds consider prices for exchange traded commodity futures, forwards and options contracts to be based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1). The values of non exchange traded forwards, swaps and certain options contracts for which market quotations are not readily available are priced by broker-dealers who derive fair values for those assets from observable inputs (Level 2). Investments in partnerships (other commodity pools) where there are no other rights or obligations inherent within the ownership interest held by the Partnership are priced based on the end of the day net asset value (Level 2). The value of the Partnership’s investments in partnerships reflects its proportional interest in the partnerships. As of and for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Partnership and the Funds did not hold any derivative instruments that are priced at fair value using unobservable inputs through the application of management’s assumptions and internal valuation pricing models (Level 3).

     Futures Contracts. The Partnership and the Funds trade futures contracts. A futures contract is a firm commitment to buy or sell a specified quantity of investments, currency or a standardized amount of a deliverable grade commodity, at a specified price on a specified future date, unless the contract is closed before the delivery date or if the delivery quantity is something where physical delivery cannot occur (such as the S&P 500 Index), whereby such contract is settled in cash. Payments (“variation margin”) may be made or received by the Partnership each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying contracts, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Partnership. When the contract is closed, the Partnership records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. Because transactions in futures contracts require participants to make both initial margin deposits of cash or other assets and variation margin deposits, through the futures brokers, directly with the exchange on which the contracts are traded, credit exposure is limited. Realized gains (losses) and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on futures contracts are included in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

     London Metals Exchange Forward Contracts. Metal contracts traded on the London Metals Exchange (“LME”) represent a firm commitment to buy or sell a specified quantity of aluminum, copper, lead, nickel, tin or zinc. LME contracts traded by the Partnership and the Funds are cash settled based on prompt dates published by the LME. Payments (“variation margin”) may be made or received by the Partnership and the Funds each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying contracts, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Partnership and the Funds. A contract is considered offset when all long positions have been matched with short positions. When the contract is closed at the prompt date, the Partnership and the Funds record a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. Because transactions in LME contracts require participants to make both initial margin deposits of cash or other assets and variation margin deposits, through the broker, directly with the LME, credit exposure is limited. Realized gains (losses) and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on metal contracts are included in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

     Forward Foreign Currency Contracts. Foreign currency contracts are those contracts where the Funds agrees to receive or deliver a fixed quantity of foreign currency for an agreed-upon price on an agreed future date. Foreign currency contracts are valued daily, and the Funds’ net equity therein, representing unrealized gain or loss on the contracts as measured by the difference between the forward foreign exchange rates at the dates of entry into the contracts and the forward rates at the reporting date, is included in the Statements of Financial Condition. Realized gains (losses) and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on foreign currency contracts are recognized in the period in which the contract is closed or the changes occur, respectively, and are included in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

     The Funds do not isolate that portion of the results of operations arising from the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from fluctuations from changes in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in net gain (loss) on investments in the Statements of Income and Expenses and Change in Partners’ Capital.

     Options. The Funds may purchase and write (sell) both exchange listed and over—the— counter options on commodities or financial instruments. An option is a contract allowing, but not requiring, its holder to buy (call) or sell (put) a specific or standard commodity or financial instrument at a specified price during a specified time period. The option premium is the total price paid or received for the option contract. When the Funds write an option, the premium received is recorded as a liability in the Statements of Financial Condition and marked to market daily. When the Funds purchase an option, the premium paid is recorded as an asset in the

Statements of Financial Condition and marked to market daily.Realized gains (losses) and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on options contracts are included in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

     Income Taxes. Income taxes have not been provided as each partner is individually liable for the taxes, if any, on their share of the Partnership’s income and expenses.

     In 2007, the Partnership adopted ASC 740, Income Taxes (formerly, FAS No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”). ASC 740 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. ASC 740 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Partnership’s financial statements to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the pplicable tax authority. Tax positions with respect to tax at the partnership level not deemed to meet the “more-likely-than-not” threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. The General Partner concluded that no provision for income tax is required in the Partnership’s financial statements.

     The following is the major tax jurisdiction for the Partnership and the earliest tax year subject to examination: United States — 2006.

     Subsequent Events. In 2009, the Partnership adopted ASC 855, Subsequent Events (formerly, FAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events”). The objective of ASC 855 is to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or available to be issued. Management has determined that there were no subsequent events requiring adjustment or disclosure in the financial statements.

     Recent Accounting Pronouncements. In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06 (“ASU 2010-06”), “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements”, which, among other things, amends ASC 820 to require entities to separately present purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in their reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements (i.e. to present such items on a gross basis rather than on a net basis), and which clarifies existing disclosure requirements provided by ASC 820 regarding the level of disaggregation and the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for measurements that fall within either Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements (which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years). Management is currently assessing the impact that the adoption of ASU 2010-06 will have on the Partnership’s financial statements disclosures.

     In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-09 (“ASU 2010-09”), “Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements,” which among other things amended ASC 855 to remove the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This change alleviates potential conflicts between ASC 855 and the SEC’s requirements. All of the amendments in this update are effective upon issuance of this update. Management has included these amendments in the financial statements.

     Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Item 7A.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Introduction

     The Partnership/Funds are speculative commodity pools. The market sensitive instruments held by the Partnership/Funds are acquired for speculative trading purposes, and all or substantially all of the Partnership’s/Funds’ assets are subject to the risk of trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Partnership’s/Funds’ main line of business.

     The risk to the Limited Partners that have purchased interests in the Partnership/Funds is limited to the amount of their capital contributions to the Partnership/Funds and their share of Partnership assets and undistributed profits. This limited liability is a consequence of the organization of the Partnership/Funds as limited partnerships under applicable law.

     Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair market value of the Partnership’s/Funds’ open positions and, consequently, in their earnings and cash balances. The Partnership’s/Funds’ market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, equity price levels, the market value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects among the Partnership’s/Funds’ open positions and the liquidity of the markets in which they trade.

     The Partnership/Funds rapidly acquire and liquidate both long and short positions in a wide range of different markets. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and the Partnership’s/Funds’ past performance is not necessarily indicative of their future results.

     Value at Risk is a measure of the maximum amount which the Partnership/Funds could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector. However, the inherent uncertainty of the Partnerships’/Funds’ speculative trading and the recurrence in the markets traded by the Partnership/Funds of market movements far exceeding expectations could result in actual trading or non-trading losses far beyond the indicated Value at Risk or the Partnership’s/Funds’ experience to date (i.e., “risk of ruin”). In light of the foregoing as well as the risks and uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the inclusion of the quantification in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or representation that the Partnership’s/Funds’ losses in any market sector will be limited to Value at Risk or by the Partnership’s/Funds’ attempts to manage their market risk.

      Materiality as used in this section, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” is based on an assessment of reasonably possible market movements and the potential losses caused by such movements, taking into account the leverage, optionality and multiplier features of the Partnership’s/Funds’ market sensitive instruments.

Quantifying the Partnership’s/Funds’ Trading Value at Risk

     The following quantitative disclosures regarding the Partnership’s/Funds’ market risk exposures contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). All quantitative disclosures in this section are deemed to be forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor except for statements of historical fact (such as the terms of particular contracts and the number of market risk sensitive instruments held during or at the end of the reporting period).

     The Partnership’s/Funds’ risk exposure in the various market sectors traded by the Advisors is quantified below in terms of Value at Risk. Due to the Partnership’s/Funds’ mark-to-market accounting, any loss in the fair value of the Partnership’s/Funds’ open positions is directly reflected in the Partnership’s earnings (realized and unrealized) and cash balances. Exchange maintenance margin requirements have been used by the Partnership/Funds as the measure of its Value at Risk. Maintenance margin requirements are set by exchanges to equal or exceed the maximum losses reasonably expected to be incurred in the fair value of any given contract in 95% — 99% of any one-day interval. The maintenance margin levels are established by dealers and exchanges using historical price studies as well as an assessment of current market volatility (including the implied volatility of the options on a given futures contract) and economic fundamentals to provide a probabilistic estimate of the maximum expected near-term one-day price fluctuation. Maintenance margin has been used rather than the more generally available initial margin, because initial margin includes a credit risk component which is not relevant to Value at Risk.

     In the case of market sensitive instruments which are not exchange traded (almost exclusively currencies in the case of the Partnership/Funds), the margin requirements for the equivalent futures positions have been used as Value at Risk. In those rare cases in which a futures-equivalent margin is not available, dealers’ margins have been used.

     The fair value of the Partnership’s/Funds’ futures and forward positions does not have any optionality component. However, certain of the Advisors trade commodity options. The Value at Risk associated with options is reflected in the following tables as the margin requirement attributable to the instrument underlying each option. Where the instrument is a futures contract, the futures margin has been used, and where the instrument is a physical commodity, the futures-equivalent maintenance margin has been used. This calculation is conservative in that it assumes that the fair value of an option will decline by the same amount as the fair value of the underlying instrument, whereas, in fact, the fair values of the options traded by the Partnership/Funds’ in almost all cases fluctuate to a lesser extent than those of the underlying instruments.

     In quantifying the Partnership’s/Funds’ Value at Risk, 100% positive correlation in the different positions held in each market risk category has been assumed. Consequently, the margin requirements applicable to the open contracts have simply been added to determine each trading category’s aggregate Value at Risk. The diversification effects resulting from the fact that the Partnership’s/Funds’ positions are rarely, if ever, 100% positively correlated have not been reflected.

The Partnership’s Trading Value at Risk in Different Market Sectors

     Value at Risk tables represent a probabilistic assessment of the risk of loss in market risk sensitive instruments. With the exception of CFM, the Partnership’s advisors currently trade the Partnership’s assets indirectly in master fund managed accounts established in the name over which they have been granted limited authority to make trading decisions. CFM directly trades a managed account in the Partnership’s name. The first two trading Value at Risk tables reflect the market sensitive instruments held by the Partnership directly and through its investment in the Funds. The remaining trading Value at Risk tables reflect the market sensitive instruments held by the Partnership directly (i.e., in the managed account in the Partnership’s name traded by CFM) and indirectly by each Fund separately.

     The following tables indicate the trading Value at Risk associated with the Partnership’s open positions by market category as of December 31, 2009 and 2008.

     As of December 31, 2009, Partnership’s total capitalization was $31,924,681.

						% of Total
Market Sector		Value at Risk				Capitalization
Currencies		$	451,206				1.41	%
Energy			291,723				0.92	%
Grains			96,877				0.30	%
Interest Rates U.S.			371,264				1.16	%
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			336,573				1.05	%
Livestock			2,723				0.01	%
Metals			231,949				0.73	%
Softs			159,070				0.50	%
Indices			837,049				2.62	%
Total		$	2,778,434				8.70	%

     As of December 31, 2008, Partnership’s total capitalization was $44,393,328.

						% of Total
Market Sector		Value at Risk				Capitalization
Currencies		$	337,552				0.76	%
Energy			55,481				0.13	%
Grains			50,494				0.11	%
Interest Rates U.S.			499,190				1.12	%
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			406,686				0.92	%
Livestock			74,930				0.17	%
Metals			148,637				0.33	%
Softs			61,119				0.14	%
Indices			27,831				0.06	%
Total		$	1,661,920				3.74	%

     The following tables indicate the trading Value at Risk associated with the Partnership’s investments and investments in the Funds by market category as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the highest, lowest and average value at any point during the years. All open position trading risk exposures of the Partnership/Funds have been included in calculating the figures set forth below. As of December 31, 2009, the Partnership’s total capitalization was $31,924,681. The Partnership’s Value at Risk for the portion of its assets that are traded directly through CFM’s Discus Program was as follows:

December 31, 2009

						% of Total				High				Low				Average
Market Sector		Value at Risk				Capitalization				Value at Risk				Value at Risk				Value at Risk*
Currencies		$	94,350				0.30	%		$	924,240			$	48,092			$	299,825
Energy			19,200				0.06	%			468,290				10,460				128,320
Grains			10,500				0.03	%			67,500				5,500				22,427
Interest Rates U.S.			100,650				0.32	%			2,038,884				8,800				490,455
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			111,381				0.35	%			687,893				3,443				194,858
Metals			3,500				0.01	%			33,249				709				8,795
Softs			1,500				0.00	%**			118,770				1,500				35,313
Indices			434,578				1.36	%			1,192,715				6,456				222,172
Total		$	775,659				2.43	%

     As of December 31, 2008, the Partnership’s total capitalization was $44,393,328. As of December 31, 2008, the Partnership’s Value at Risk for the portion of its assets that are traded directly by CFM was as follows:

December 31, 2008

						% of Total				High				Low				Average
Market Sector		Value at Risk				Capitalization				Value at Risk				Value at Risk				Value at Risk*
Currencies		$	94,857				0.21	%		$	427,193			$	31,435				146,876
Energy			6,750				0.02	%			327,900				395				104,415
Grains			5,500				0.01	%			30,000				1,500				13,805
Indices			329,662				0.74	%			1,058,238				15,137				407,721
Interest Rates U.S.			71,400				0.16	%			348,950				6,787				124,983
Interest Rates Non -U.S.			74,310				0.17	%			693,867				24,501				180,284
Metals			4,302				0.01	%			31,460				3,250				9,615
Softs			12,153				0.03	%			85,468				2,900				40,835
Total		$	598,934				1.35	%

     As of December 31, 2009, Willowbridge Master’s total capitalization was $231,105,317. The Partnership owned approximately 2.3% of Willowbridge Master. The Partnership’s Value at Risk for the portion of its assets that are traded indirectly through its investment in the Willowbridge Master as of December 31, 2009 was as follows:

December 31, 2009

						% of Total				High				Low				Average
Market Sector		Value at Risk				Capitalization				Value at Risk				Value at Risk				Value at Risk*
Currencies		$	5,974,364				2.58	%		$	14,208,480			$	1,008,000			$	7,206,662
Energy			2,116,000				0.92	%			13,037,019				391,000				5,515,268
Grains			1,058,000				0.46	%			5,919,480				259,875				2,320,519
Interest Rates U.S.			1,959,945				0.85	%			9,939,105				280,500				2,836,425
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			3,403,449				1.47	%			14,168,324				455,649				4,852,602
Metals			3,968,558				1.72	%			8,372,754				1,909,575				3,799,612
Softs			2,725,100				1.18	%			3,202,100				237,900				1,531,645
Total		$	21,205,416				9.18	%

     As of December 31, 2008, Willowbridge Master’s total capitalization was $297,420,004. The Partnership owned approximately 3.4% of Willowbridge Master. The Partnership’s Value at Risk for the portion of its assets that are traded indirectly through its investment in the Willowbridge Master as of December 31, 2008 was as follows:

						% of Total				High				Low				Average
Market Sector		Value at Risk				Capitalization				Value at Risk				Value at Risk				Value at Risk*
Currencies		$	1,945,600				0.65	%		$	11,556,229			$	245,220			$	3,464,607
Energy			816,000				0.27	%			15,933,000				448,000				4,885,321
Grains			1,100,800				0.37	%			5,470,800				201,000				2,038,390
Interest Rates U.S.			2,380,800				0.80	%			4,367,200				219,300				1,272,506
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			3,571,688				1.20	%			8,375,150				387,940				3,540,377
Metals			3,110,400				1.05	%			8,742,000				764,750				4,883,083
Softs			819,200				0.28	%			2,989,200				120,600				1,077,150
Total		$	13,744,488				4.62	%

     As of December 31, 2009, Graham Master’s total capitalization was $171,212,260. The Partnership owned approximately 4.6% of Graham Master. The Partnership’s Value at Risk for the portion of its assets that are traded indirectly through its investment in the Graham Master as of December 31, 2009 was as follows:

December 31, 2009

						% of Total				High				Low				Average
Market Sector		Value at Risk				Capitalization				Value at Risk				Value at Risk				Value at Risk*
Currencies		$	2,410,532				1.41	%		$	8,136,447			$	833,881			$	4,612,528
Energy			684,083				0.40	%			3,017,929				273,236				1,214,764
Grains			549,675				0.32	%			1,846,996				96,550				731,407
Interest Rates U.S.			142,150				0.08	%			2,365,808				87,777				859,990
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			1,869,099				1.09	%			8,320,518				471,498				2,867,131
Livestock			59,200				0.04	%			160,380				1,080				58,409
Metals			1,222,254				0.71	%			1,806,942				297,478				1,002,985
Softs			1,131,557				0.66	%			1,479,945				190,202				768,323
Indices			4,809,915				2.81	%			12,019,804				623,680				5,396,991
Total		$	12,878,465				7.52	%

     As of December 31, 2008, Graham Master’s total capitalization was $224,490,942. The Partnership owned approximately 4.7% of Graham Master. The Partnership’s Value at Risk for the portion of its assets that are traded indirectly through its investment in the Graham Master as of December 31, 2008 was as follows:

December 31, 2008

						% of Total				High				Low				Average
Market Sector		Value at Risk				Capitalization				Value at Risk				Value at Risk				Value at Risk*
Currencies		$	1,855,003				0.83	%		$	35,051,712			$	1,110,242			$	17,137,503
Energy			446,536				0.20	%			5,209,200				310,300				1,557,045
Grains			161,000				0.07	%			1,281,500				52,500				498,714
Interest Rates U.S.			719,400				0.32	%			2,381,150				24,412				619,143
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			1,293,650				0.58	%			4,718,751				461,503				1,792,563
Livestock			13,200				0.01	%			27,600				800				15,664
Metals			680,383				0.30	%			2,071,925				31,044				777,494
Softs			201,831				0.09	%			752,387				14,000				395,956
Indices			592,157				0.26	%			5,407,658				235,978				2,482,935
Total		$	5,963,160				2.66	%

     As of December 31, 2009, Eckhardt Master’s total capitalization was $17,320,459. The Partnership owned approximately 28.5% of Eckhardt Master. The Partnership’s Value at Risk for the portion of its assets that are traded indirectly through its investment in the Eckhardt Master as of December 31, 2009 was as follows:

December 31, 2009

						% of Total				High				Low				Average
Market Sector		Value at Risk				Capitalization				Value at Risk				Value at Risk				Value at Risk*
Currencies		$	380,916				2.20	%		$	1,191,210			$	7,200			$	301,705
Energy			270,400				1.56	%			644,500				22,050				211,624
Grains			128,975				0.74	%			362,365				10,800				101,491
Interest Rates U.S.			768,410				4.44	%			768,410				14,550				196,272
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			213,803				1.23	%			696,839				13,213				221,520
Metals			284,030				1.64	%			535,674				16,196				234,566
Softs			150,320				0.87	%			251,705				11,784				115,206
Indices			635,844				3.67	%			879,160				22,367				304,994
Total		$	2,832,698				16.35	%

*

Annual average based on month-end Value at Risk

     As of December 31, 2008, Eckhardt Master’s total capitalization was $20,529,435. The Partnership owned approximately 30.7% of Eckhardt Master. The Partnership’s Value at Risk for the portion of its assets that are traded indirectly through its investment in the Eckhardt Master as of December 31, 2008 was as follows:

December 31, 2008

						% of Total				High				Low				Average*
Market Sector		Value at Risk				Capitalization				Value at Risk				Value at Risk				Value at Risk
Currencies		$	291,072				1.42	%		$	765,238			$	93,645			$	248,175
Interest Rates U.S.			178,400				0.87	%			693,100				3,300				171,494
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			498,525				2.43	%			818,628				26,782				228,987
Metals			21,510				0.10	%			142,500				8,604				34,890
Softs			37,872				0.18	%			146,081				9,238				46,542
Total		$	1,027,379				5.00	%

     As of December 31, 2009, SandRidge Master’s total capitalization was $684,909,493. The Partnership owned approximately 0.6% of SandRidge Master. The Partnership’s Value at Risk for the portion of its assets that are traded indirectly through its investment in the SandRidge Master as of December 31, 2009 was as follows:

December 31, 2009

						% of Total				High				Low				Average
Market Sector		Value at Risk				Capitalization				Value at Risk				Value at Risk				Value at Risk*
Energy		$	19,220,494				2.81	%		$	40,574,022			$	11,157,117			$	24,955,810
Total		$	19,220,494				2.81	%

Material Limitations on Value at Risk as an Assessment of Market Risk

     The face value of the market sector instruments held by the Partnership/Funds is typically many times the applicable maintenance margin requirement (margin requirements generally range between 2% and 15% of contract face value) as well as many times the capitalization of the Partnership/Funds. The magnitude of the Partnership’s/Funds’ open positions creates a “risk of ruin” not typically found in most other investment vehicles. Because of the size of its positions, certain market conditions — unusual, but historically recurring from time to time — could cause the Partnership/Funds to incur severe losses over a short period of time. The foregoing Value at Risk table — as well as the past performance of the Partnership/Funds — give no indication of this “risk of ruin.”

Non-Trading Risk

     The Partnership/Funds have non-trading market risk on its foreign cash balances not needed for margin. However, these balances (as well as any market risk they represent) are immaterial.

     Materiality as used in this section, “Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” is based on an assessment of reasonably possible market movements and the potential losses caused by such movements, taking into account the leverage, optionality and multiplier features of the Partnership’s/Funds’ market sensitive instruments.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Primary Trading Risk Exposures

     The following qualitative disclosures regarding the Partnership’s/Funds’ market risk exposures — except for (i) those disclosures that are statements of historical fact and (ii) the descriptions of how the Partnership manages its primary market risk exposures — constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. The Partnership’s/Funds’ primary market risk exposures as well as the strategies used and to be used by the General Partner and the Advisors for managing such exposures are subject to numerous uncertainties, contingencies and risks, any one of which could cause the actual results of the Partnership’s risk controls to differ materially from the objectives of such strategies. Government interventions, defaults and expropriations, illiquid markets, the emergence of dominant fundamental factors, political upheavals, changes in historical price relationships, an influx of new market participants, increased regulation and many other factors could result in material losses as well as in material changes to the risk exposures and the management strategies of the Partnership/Funds. There can be no assurance that the Partnership’s/Fund’s current market exposure and/or risk management strategies will not change materially or that any such strategies will be effective in either the short- or long- term. Investors must be prepared to lose all or substantially all of their investment in the Partnership.

     The following were the primary trading risk exposures of the Partnership/Funds’ as of December 31, 2009, by market sector.

     Interest Rates. Interest rate movements directly affect the price of the futures and forward positions held by the Partnership/Funds and indirectly affect the value of their stock index and currency positions. Interest rate movements in one country as well as relative interest rate movements between countries materially impact the Partnership’s/Funds’ profitability. The Partnership’s/Funds’ primary interest rate exposure is to interest rate fluctuations in the U.S. and the other G-8 countries. However, the Partnership/Funds also take futures positions on the government debt of smaller nations — e.g., Australia.

     Currencies. The Partnership’s/Funds’ currency exposure is to exchange rate fluctuations, primarily fluctuations which disrupt the historical pricing relationships between different currencies and currency pairs. These fluctuations are influenced by interest rate changes as well as political and general economic conditions. The General Partner does not anticipate that the risk profile of the Partnership’s/Funds’ currency sector will change significantly in the future. The currency trading Value at Risk figure includes foreign margin amounts converted into U.S. dollars with an incremental adjustment to reflect the exchange rate risk inherent to the U.S. dollar-based Partnership/Funds in expressing Value at Risk in a functional currency other than U.S. dollars.

     Stock Indices. The Partnership’s/Funds’ primary equity exposure is to equity price risk in the G-8 countries. The stock index futures traded by the Partnership/Funds are limited to futures on broadly based indices. As of December 31, 2009, the Partnership’s/Funds’ primary exposures were in stock indices on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (U.S.) and the EUREX (Germany). The Partnership/Funds are primarily exposed to the risk of adverse price trends or static markets in the major U.S., European and Japanese indices. (Static markets would not cause major market changes but would make it difficult for the Partnership/Funds to avoid being “whipsawed” into numerous small losses.)

     Metals. The Partnership’s/Funds’ primary metal market exposure is to fluctuations in the price of gold.

     Softs. The Partnership’s/Funds’ primary commodities exposure is to agricultural price movements which are often directly affected by severe or unexpected weather conditions. Coffee, sugar and cocoa accounted for the substantial bulk of the Partnership’s/Funds’ commodity exposure as of December 31, 2009.

     Energy. The Partnership’s/Fund’s primary energy market exposure is to natural gas and oil price movements, often resulting from political developments in the Middle East. Oil prices can be volatile and substantial profits and losses have been and are expected to continue to be experienced in this market.

     Grains. The Partnership’s/Fund’s commodities exposure is to agricultural price movements which are often directly affected by severe or unexpected weather conditions.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Non-Trading Risk Exposure

     The following were the only non-trading risk exposures of the Partnership/Funds as of December 31, 2009.

     Foreign Currency Balances. The Partnership’s/Funds’ primary foreign currency balances are in Japanese yen, Euro dollar, British pounds and Swiss francs. The Advisors regularly convert foreign currency balances to U.S. dollars in an attempt to control the Partnership’s/Funds’ non-trading risk.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Means of Managing Risk Exposure.

     The General Partner monitors and controls the Partnership’s/Funds’ risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring systems and accordingly believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Partnership is subject.

     The General Partner monitors the Partnership’s/Funds’ performance and the concentration of their open positions, and consults with the Advisors concerning the Partnership’s/Funds’ overall risk profile. If the General Partner felt it necessary to do so, the General Partner could require certain Advisors of the Partnership/Funds’ to close out individual positions as well as enter into programs on behalf of the Partnership/Funds. However, any such intervention would be a highly unusual event. The General Partner primarily relies on the Advisors’ own risk control policies while maintaining a general supervisory overview of the Partnership’s/Funds’ market risk exposures.

     Each Advisor applies its own risk management policies to its trading. The Advisors often follow diversification guidelines, margin limits and stop loss points to exit a position. The Advisors’ research of risk management often suggests ongoing modifications to their trading programs.

     As part of the General Partner’s risk management, the General Partner periodically meets with the Advisors to discuss their risk management and to look for any material changes to the Advisors’ portfolio balance and trading techniques. The Advisors are required to notify the General Partner of any material changes to their programs.

Item 8.		Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

DIVERSIFIED MULTI-ADVISOR FUTURES FUND L.P. II
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

		Page
		Number
Oath or Affirmation		F-2
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting		F-3
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms		F-4 — F-8
Financial Statements:
Statements of Financial Condition at December 31, 2009 and 2008		F-9
Condensed Schedules of Investments at December 31, 2009 and 2008		F-10 — F-11
Statements of Income and Expenses for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007		F-12
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007		F-13
Notes to Financial Statements		F-14 — F-25
Selected Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data		F-26
Financial Statements of CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P. Oath or Affirmation		F-27
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms		F-28 — F-30
Statements of Financial Condition at December 31, 2009 and 2008		F-31
Condensed Schedules of Investments at December 31, 2009 and 2008		F-32 — F-33
Statements of Income and Expenses for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007		F-34
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007		F-35
Notes to Financial Statements		F-36 — F-43
Selected Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data		F-44
Financial Statements of CMF Graham Capital Master Fund L.P.
Oath or Affirmation		F-45
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms		F-46 — F-48
Statements of Financial Condition at December 31, 2009 and 2008		F-49
Condensed Schedules of Investments at December 31, 2009 and 2008		F-50 — F-51
Statements of Income and Expenses for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007		F-52
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007		F-53
Notes to Financial Statements		F-54 — F-62
Selected Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data		F-63
Financial Statements of CMF Eckhardt Master Fund L.P. Oath or Affirmation		F-64
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms		F-65 — F-66
Statements of Financial Condition at December 31, 2009 and 2008		F-67
Condensed Schedules of Investments at December 31, 2009 and 2008		F-68 — F-69
Statements of Income and Expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the period from April 1, 2008 (commencement of trading operations) to December 31, 2008		F-70
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the period from April 1, 2008 (commencement of trading operations) to December 31, 2008		F-71
Notes to Financial Statements		F-72 — F-80
Selected Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data		F-81
Financial Statements of CMF SandRidge Master Fund L.P. Oath or Affirmation		F-82
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms		F-83 — F-85
Statements of Financial Condition at December 31, 2009 and 2008		F-86
Condensed Schedules of Investments at December 31, 2009 and 2008		F-87 — F-88
Statements of Income and Expenses for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007		F-89
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007		F-90
Notes to Financial Statements		F-91 — F-97
Selected Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data		F-98

 

To the Limited Partners of
Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II

 

To the best of the knowledge and belief of the undersigned, the information contained herein is accurate and complete.

 

Chief Financial Officer and Director

Ceres Managed Futures LLC

General Partner,

Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II

 

Ceres Managed Futures LLC
55 East 59th Street
10th Floor
New York, N.Y. 10022
212-559-2011

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting

 

The management of Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II (formerly Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II) (the Partnership), Ceres Managed Futures LLC (formerly, Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a — 15(f) and 15d — 15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and for our assessment of internal control over financial reporting. The Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

 

(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Partnership;

 

(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Partnership are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Partnership; and

 

(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection and correction of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Partnership’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

The management of Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II has assessed the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our assessment, management concluded that the Partnership maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 based on the criteria referred to above.

 

The Partnership’s independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, has audited the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, as stated in their report dated March 19, 2010 which appears herein.

 

Jennifer Magro

Chief Financial Officer and Director

Ceres Managed Futures LLC

General Partner,

Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Partners of
Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II:

We have audited the accompanying statement of financial condition of Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II (the “Partnership”), including the condensed schedule of investments, as of December 31, 2009, and the related statements of income and expenses, and changes in partners’ capital for the year then ended. We also have audited the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Partnership’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and an opinion on the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. The financial statements of the Partnership for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 were audited by other auditors whose reports, dated March 26, 2009 and March 24, 2008, respectively, expressed unqualified opinions on those statements.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A partnership’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the partnership’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the partnership’s general partner, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A partnership’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the partnership; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the partnership are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and general partner of the partnership; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Partnership’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II as of December 31, 2009, and the results of its operations and its changes in partners’ capital for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the Partnership maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
New York, New York

March 19, 2010

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Partners of
Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II:

In our opinion, the accompanying statement of financial condition, the related statement of income and expenses, and statement of changes in partners’ capital present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II (formerly known as Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund II L.P.) at December 31, 2008 and the results of its operations for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Partnership maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Partnership’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York
March 26, 2009

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Partners
Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II:

We have audited the accompanying statements of income and expenses and changes in partners’ capital of Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II (formerly, Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II) for the year ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results of its operations and changes in partners’ capital of Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II for the year ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 24, 2008

Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II
Statements of Financial Condition
December 31, 2009 and 2008

 

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

 

Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II
Condensed Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

 

Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II
Condensed Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2008

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

 

Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II
Statements of Income and Expenses
for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

 

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

 

Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital
for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

 

 

2007:		$	1,651.70
2008:		$	1,867.00
2009:		$	1,724.57

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

 

 

Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2009

 

 

Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II (formerly, Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II) (the “Partnership”) is a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York on May 10, 1994 to engage, directly or indirectly, in the speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of commodity interests including futures contracts, options, swaps and forward contracts. The sectors traded included currencies, energy, grains, indices, metals, softs, livestock, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates. The commodity interests that are traded by the Partnership and the Funds (as defined in Note 5 “Investment in Partnerships”) are volatile and involve a high degree of market risk. The Partnership was authorized to sell 100,000 redeemable units of Limited Partnership Interest (“Redeemable Units”) during its initial offering period. The Partnership no longer offers Redeemable Units for sale.

 

Ceres Managed Futures LLC (formerly Citigroup Managed Futures LLC), a Delaware limited liability company, acts as the general partner (the “General Partner”) and commodity pool operator of the Partnership. The General Partner is wholly owned by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Holdings LLC (“MSSB Holdings”), a newly registered non-clearing futures commission merchant and a member of the National Futures Association (“NFA”). Morgan Stanley, indirectly through various subsidiaries, owns 51% of MSSB Holdings. Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“CGM”), the commodity broker and a selling agent for the Partnership, owns 49% of MSSB Holdings. Citigroup Inc. (“Citigroup”), indirectly through various subsidiaries, wholly owns CGM. Prior to July 31, 2009, the date as of which MSSB Holdings became its owner, the General Partner was wholly owned by Citigroup Financial Products Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc., the sole owner of which is Citigroup.

 

The General Partner and each Limited Partner share in the profits and losses of the Partnership in proportion to the amount of partnership interest owned by each except that no Limited Partner shall be liable for obligations of the Partnership in excess of their initial capital contribution and profits, if any, net of distributions.

 

The Partnership will be liquidated upon the first to occur of the following: December 31, 2014; the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit decreases to less than $400 per Redeemable Unit as of a close of any business day; or under certain other circumstances as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement of the Partnership (the “Limited Partnership Agreement”).

 

On July 1, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”) No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, also known as FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 105, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“ASC 105”) (the “Codification”). ASC 105 established the exclusive authoritative reference for U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for use in financial statements except for Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and interpretive releases, which are also authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. The Codification is the single source of authoritative accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and applies to all financial statements issued after September 15, 2009.

 

 

 

Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2009

 

 

 

Partnership’s and the Fund’s Fair Value Measurements.  The Partnership and the Funds (as defined in note 5 “Investment in Partnerships”) adopted ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (formerly, FAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”) as of January 1, 2008 which defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures regarding fair value measurements in accordance with GAAP. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to fair values derived from unobservable inputs (Level 3). The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls shall be determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Partnership did not apply the deferral allowed by ASC 820 for non financial assets and non financial liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

 

In 2009, the Partnership adopted amendments to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (formerly, FAS No. 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly”) which reaffirms that fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. These amendments to ASC 820 also reaffirm the need to use judgment in determining if a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when the market has become inactive. These amendments to ASC 820 are required for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. Management has concluded that based on available information in the marketplace, there has not been a decrease in the volume and level of activity in the Partnership’s Level 2 assets and liabilities. The adoption of the amendments to ASC 820 had no effect on the Partnership’s Financial Statements.

 

The Partnership and the Funds consider prices for exchange traded commodity futures, forwards and options contracts to be based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1). The values of non exchange traded forwards, swaps and certain options contracts for which market quotations are not readily available are priced by broker-dealers who derive fair values for those assets from observable inputs (Level 2). Investments in partnerships (other commodity pools) where there are no other rights or obligations inherent within the ownership interest held by the Partnership are priced based on the end of the day net asset value (Level 2). The value of the Partnership’s investments in partnerships reflects its proportional interest in the partnerships. As of and for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Partnership and the Funds did not hold any derivative instruments that are priced at fair value

 

Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2009

 

using unobservable inputs through the application of management’s assumptions and internal valuation pricing models (Level 3).