UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 28,
2009
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File
No. 000-50052
Cosi, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
06-1393745
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
1751 Lake
Cook Road, Suite 600, Deerfield, Illinois 60015
(Address
and Zip Code of Principal Executive Offices)
(847) 597-8800
(Registrants
telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
Title of class
|
|
Common Stock
($.01 par value)
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by a check mark if the registrant is not required to
file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d)
of Exchange
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such a shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files.) Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $24,151,684
as of June 30, 2009 based upon the closing price of the
registrants common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market
reported for June 30, 2009. Shares of voting stock held by
each executive officer and director and by each person who, as
of such date, may be deemed to have beneficially owned more than
5% of the outstanding voting stock have been excluded. This
determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a
conclusive determination of affiliate status for any other
purpose.
51,316,105 shares of the registrants common stock
were outstanding on March 23, 2010.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III of this
Form 10-K
incorporates certain information from the Registrants
definitive proxy statement for its Annual Meeting of
Stockholders expected to be held on May 18, 2010. The
definitive proxy statement will be filed by the Registrant with
the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than
120 days from the end of the Registrants fiscal year
ended December 28, 2009.
PART I
General
Cosi, Inc., a Delaware corporation incorporated on May 15,
1998, owns, operates and franchises premium convenience
restaurants which sell high-quality hot and cold sandwiches,
freshly-tossed salads, Cosi bagels, flatbread pizzas,
Smores and other desserts, and a variety of coffees along
with other soft drink beverages, teas and alcoholic beverages,
mostly beer and wine. Our restaurants are located in a wide
range of markets and trade areas, including business districts
and residential communities in both urban and suburban
locations. We believe that we have created significant brand
equity in our markets and that we have demonstrated the appeal
of our concept to a wide variety of customers.
As of December 28, 2009, there were 145
Cosi®
owned and franchised restaurants operating in 18 states,
the District of Columbia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
Our internet website is www.getcosi.com. We make
available
free-of-charge
through our website our annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we
electronically file or furnish such materials to the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC). In addition, our
internet website includes, among other things, our corporate
governance principles, charters of various committees of the
Board of Directors, and our code of business conduct and ethics
applicable to all employees, officers and directors. Copies of
these documents may be obtained free of charge from our internet
website. Any stockholder also may obtain copies of these
documents, free of charge, by sending a request in writing to:
Cosi, Inc.,
c/o Investor
Relations, 1751 Lake Cook Road, Suite 600, Deerfield,
Illinois 60015.
Business
Strategy
Our goal is to become the preferred fast-casual dining concept
nationally. We strive to serve delicious food that is always
surprising, with unparalleled customer service, in a unique,
welcoming and sophisticated ambiance. The Cosi restaurant
concept, whose name was inspired by Mozarts famous opera,
Così Fan Tutte, originated in Paris as a
Parisian café. We strive to create a romance between our
famous, made-fresh bread, our barista-crafted coffees and
specialty drinks, and our loyal guests.
We believe that our customers are primarily adults aged 18 to
40, upscale suburbanites and metro elites of all ages. Our
market studies show that there are approximately 40 million
heads of households in this demographic mix. Our strategy is to
make Cosi the restaurant of choice for those who insist
that...LIFE SHOULD BE DELICIOUS.
We plan to become the preferred national fast casual restaurant
by:
Offering an innovative menu appealing to the sophisticated
tastes of our target customer. Our restaurants
offer innovative savory, freshly
made-to-order
products featuring our authentic hearth-baked signature Cosi
bread and distinctive high quality, fresh ingredients. We
maintain a pipeline of new menu offerings that are introduced
seasonally through limited time offerings to keep our products
relevant to our target customers.
Providing customers with an exceptional service and dining
experience. Our restaurants are designed to
provide a memorable dining experience in a warm, welcoming
environment offering free internet access through a managed
Wi-Fi network.
We believe our partners are proud to be part of an organization
that stands for quality, innovation and distinctive flair. We
are passionate about serving excellent food in an atmosphere
that is comfortable and inviting. We seek to train our partners
to provide the highest level of friendly customer service. We
believe that we provide an affordable luxury that
our customers can enjoy everyday.
Expanding marketing initiatives to build brand
awareness. Our marketing strategy is to focus our
marketing efforts on building brand awareness and increasing the
frequency of visits. We do this through the
3
development of a marketing calendar that focuses on five time
periods (Winter, Spring, Summer, Fall, and Holiday), improved
merchandising to better influence the purchasing behavior of our
guests and reduced ordering complexity. Our marketing strategies
include our CosiCard loyalty program, food focused
out-of-restaurant
advertising, print advertising, targeted direct-mail, and our
recently deployed web-based social media marketing campaigns. We
want our message to energize our guests by all that there is to
taste, see, and do. We aim to attract guests who seek to enjoy
lifes full flavor.
Increasing comparable restaurant sales and average unit
volumes. We seek to increase comparable
restaurant sales and average unit volumes by increasing
top-of-mind
awareness of the Cosi brand through the introduction of new menu
items, expansion of our catering sales opportunities, increasing
sales across all dayparts and the promotion of seasonal product
offerings.
Operating our restaurants efficiently. We have
developed operating disciplines that are designed to optimize
the cost structure of our restaurants and to be applied
consistently across all our restaurants, Company-owned and
franchise, and we continually seek to refine and improve upon
those disciplines both domestically and internationally.
Growth
Strategy
We plan to grow in both existing and new markets through the
following:
Build a system of franchised restaurants and develop
Company-owned restaurants. We expect that
Company-owned restaurants (restaurants that we own as opposed to
franchised restaurants) will always be an important part of our
new restaurant growth; however, our franchising and area
developer model will be the primary driver of our growth
strategy. We will continue to pursue Company-owned development
to achieve critical mass in our core markets while focusing on
expanding our franchise system nationally. We launched our
franchising program in fiscal 2004 and seek to expand our
franchise system through an influx of new domestic and
international franchisees. As part of our strategy to expand our
franchise base and attract quality franchisees, we will consider
the potential sale of a restaurant or a group of restaurants to
fuel the overall growth of the system. We prefer that our
franchisees have experience in
multi-unit
restaurant operations and development. We believe that our
concept positioning, national and international growth
opportunity and potential for strong unit-level economics will
enable us to attract experienced and well-capitalized area
developers. We are currently eligible to offer franchises in
47 states and the District of Columbia.
Pursue foodservice strategic alliances. We
will explore strategic alliances with our Cosi Pronto (our
grab-and-go
concept) and full service concepts in educational institutions,
airports, train stations and other venues that meet our
operating and financial criteria. We believe that this is an
attractive opportunity to further Cosis growth through
alternative venues. We currently operate Cosi restaurants at St.
Josephs University in Philadelphia, PA and Georgetown
University in Washington, DC under a franchisee agreement with
Aramark. We also operate our
grab-and-go
concept at New Yorks LaGuardia and Bostons Logan
airports through franchisee agreements.
Cosi
Product Offerings
We offer proprietary food and beverage products for four major
dayparts breakfast, lunch, snacking and dinner. Our
food menu includes Cosi Squagels, sandwiches, salads, soups,
appetizers, melts, flatbread pizzas, Smores and other
desserts. We feature our authentic hearth-baked signature Cosi
bread in two varieties, our original Rustica and our Etruscan
Whole Grain. Our beverage menu features a variety of house
coffees and other espresso-based beverages, seasonal fruit
smoothies and specialty drinks, soft drinks, flavored teas and
bottled beverages, which include premium still and sparkling
waters. For our health-conscious guests, we have a lighter
side menu featuring lower-calorie versions of popular menu
items and other unique salads and sandwiches that are lower in
calorie content than other items in the same menu categories. We
offer beer and wine at most of our locations and an additional
limited selection of alcoholic beverages in some locations. For
our young guests, we offer our Parent Magazine award winning
Kids Menu which includes an activity page and crayons.
4
Most of our restaurants offer catering service for the breakfast
and lunch dayparts. Our catering offerings include breakfast
baskets, lunch buffets, dessert platters, and include most of
our menu offerings. We operate a catering call center in New
York City which coordinates the ordering and fulfillment process
for 16 catering hub locations in four major metropolitan areas.
We offer set up and delivery by Cosi personnel to all our
catering customers.
We periodically introduce new menu platforms and products in
order to keep our product offerings relevant to consumers in
each daypart. Our expanded breakfast menu now includes
hearth-baked quiches, oatmeal, fresh fruit parfaits and a
variety of craveable signature breakfast wraps and sandwiches.
We enhanced our guests dining options by introducing
Cosi Duo to the menu which allows them to create
their own meal by combining two items of proportion from our
offerings of unique sandwiches, fresh salads and soups. New
recipes are developed by our Executive Chef with the support of
the food and beverage team. These recipes are thoroughly
evaluated, both internally and through beta testing in consumer
markets.
People
On December 28, 2009, we had 99 Company-owned restaurants
and 2,409 employees, of whom 76 served in administrative or
executive capacities, 264 served as restaurant management
employees and 2,069 were hourly restaurant employees. None of
our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement
and we have never experienced an organized work stoppage or
strike. We believe that our compensation packages are
competitive and our relations with our employees are good.
Restaurant
Operations
Management Structure. The restaurant
operations team is built around regional districts led by
District Managers, who report to a Vice President of Operations.
The Vice President of Operations and District Managers are
responsible for all operations, training, recruiting and human
resources within their regions. The Vice President of Operations
is also responsible for the financial plan for all Company-owned
locations and for the people development plan to support the
execution of our plans. The Vice President of Operations reports
directly to the Chief Executive Officer. Supporting the field
operations teams is a Vice President of Operations Services and
Platforms who is responsible for developing and implementing
operating standards and best practices across the system for the
benefit of the entire brand. The Vice President of Operations
Services and Platforms reports to the Chief Executive Officer.
During fiscal 2008 we introduced an Operations Excellence
Framework that provides two new business assessment tools,
Operations Excellence Basics (OEB) and Operations
Excellence Review (OER) that our field management
teams use for evaluating our guest services, facility
maintenance, unit-level financial performance, partner
assessments and product quality and assurance. These assessment
tools provide the framework and process for identification of
areas of opportunity as well as the development of actionable
plans to improve operations. During fiscal 2009, we added an
action plan component to the OER that allows the field
operations teams to assess performance and, additionally, to
address the opportunities with a specific action plan to drive
desired results. During fiscal 2010 we expect to measure the
improvements in key restaurant metrics in relation to the
completion of these action plans. The OEB continues to be an
important tool that allows our District Managers to perform an
evaluation of our 10 most critical operations and administrative
standards during every visit.
To ensure consistent performance execution and application of
our policies and procedures, we have a Standard Operations
Manual which is reviewed and updated periodically.
Sales Forecasting. The Vice President of
Operations and District Managers have real-time access to sales
forecasts and actual sales information through our web-based
reporting system. This allows the entire management team to plan
staffing requirements on a weekly, daily and even hourly basis
to effectively serve our customers.
Product Quality. Our food and beverage quality
is managed at four critical stages: sourcing, distribution, line
readiness and product preparation. Products are delivered to the
restaurants several times each week so that all restaurants
maintain fresh quality products. Because our restaurants serve a
different variety of products during different dayparts, a
specific line readiness checklist is completed to ensure that
the products have been rotated,
5
prepared and staged correctly. Finally, our partner training
program includes certification in both product knowledge and
product preparation standards.
Food and Labor Cost Controls. Our information
system allows us to track actual versus theoretical cost of
goods sold. Detailed reports are available at the restaurant
level showing variances on an
item-by-item
basis. The system is interfaced into our accounts payable and
general ledger systems so that restaurant managers have control
of their operations and can be held accountable for their
results.
Our labor management standards help our managers control labor
and ensure that staffing levels are appropriate to meet our
service standards. Our reporting system provides our
multi-unit
managers with performance reports that help them make staffing
adjustments during the course of the week. All labor scheduling
is approved by a District Manager and unit level performance is
reviewed weekly.
For manager and support controllable costs, we use either a
fixed dollar budget standard or a percentage of net sales
approach to plan expenditures effectively. Actual performance
for each of these expense items is compared to budget on a
weekly basis to help ensure accountability and operational
alignment with financial planning efforts. We believe that the
combination of these structured restaurant operating systems and
technologies allows our restaurant managers to focus their time
more effectively on the
day-to-day
drivers of our business.
Management
Information Systems
Our systems are structured for the integration of data from the
point-of-sale
and back-office modules in the restaurants to our financial,
reporting and inventory management systems. Key information
relating to restaurant operations is uploaded onto a secure
website multiple times throughout the day. This operational
restaurant information is available to key internal customers,
along with pre-selected reports that are automatically
distributed to our operations team.
We use a select group of service providers to supplement our
information technology infrastructure and system offerings. This
provides us access to
up-to-date
technology and allows us the flexibility to adjust service
levels and cost as needed. Our application strategy includes
utilizing web-based technology to provide timely information to
operate and manage the business.
We have a disaster recovery plan in place for all critical
hardware, software, data and related processes. The plan
encompasses scheduled
back-ups,
off-site storage, security, and failover configurations with
redundancy built into key processes.
Purchasing
We have agreements with some of the nations largest food,
paper, and beverage manufacturers in the industry. This enables
us to provide our restaurants with high quality proprietary food
products and non-food items at competitive prices. We source and
negotiate prices directly with these suppliers and distribute
these products to our restaurants primarily through a national
network that consists of some of the nations largest
independent distributors. We do not utilize a commissary system.
Our inventory control system allows each restaurant to place
orders electronically with our master distributor and then
transmits the invoices electronically to our accounts payable
system. Our scalable system eliminates duplicate work, and we
believe it gives our management tight control of costs while
ensuring quality and consistency across all restaurants.
We have an agreement with Distribution Market Advantage, Inc.
(Distribution Marketing Advantage) that provides us
access to a national network of independent distributors. Under
this agreement the independent distributors supply us with
approximately 78% of our food and paper products, primarily
under pricing agreements that we negotiate directly with the
suppliers. This agreement expires in November 2010 and we have
issued a request for proposal to Distribution Marketing
Advantage and other distribution organizations. We expect to
complete the review and evaluation of proposals during the
second quarter of fiscal 2010.
We have a long-term beverage marketing agreement with the
Coca-Cola
Company. We received a marketing allowance under this agreement,
which is being recognized as a reduction to expense ratably
based on actual
6
products purchased. Although we are eligible to receive
additional amounts under the agreement if certain purchase
levels are achieved, no additional amounts have been received or
recorded as of December 28, 2009.
We purchase all contracted coffee products through a single
supplier, Coffee Bean International, Inc. (Coffee Bean
International). In the event of a business interruption,
Coffee Bean International is required to utilize the services of
a third-party roaster to fulfill its obligations. If the
services of a third-party roaster are used, Coffee Bean
International will guarantee that the product fulfillment
standards stated in our contract will remain in effect
throughout such business interruption period. This agreement
expires in June 2010 and we have issued a request for a proposal
to Coffee Bean International and other coffee suppliers. We will
conclude the review and evaluation of proposals prior to the
expiration of the current contract.
Our primary suppliers and independent distributors have parallel
facilities and systems to minimize the risk of any disruption of
our supply chain.
Competition
The restaurant industry is intensely competitive and we compete
with many well-established food service companies, including
other sandwich retailers, specialty coffee retailers, bagel
shops, fast food restaurants, delicatessens, cafes, bars,
take-out food service companies, supermarkets and convenience
stores. The principal factors on which we compete are taste,
quality and price of products offered, customer service,
atmosphere, location and overall guest experience. Our
competitors change with each daypart, ranging from coffee bars
and bakery cafes in the morning daypart, to fast food
restaurants and cafes during the lunch daypart, to casual dining
chains during the dinner daypart. Many of our competitors or
potential competitors have substantially greater financial and
other resources than we do which may allow them to react more
quickly to changes in pricing, marketing and the quick-service
restaurant industry. We also compete with other employers in our
markets for hourly workers and may be subject to higher labor
costs. We believe that our concept, attractive price-value
relationship and quality of products and service allow us to
compete favorably with our competitors.
Intellectual
Property
We have the following U.S. Trademark registrations:
COSÌ, (SUN & MOON
DESIGN), COSÌ (& HEARTH DESIGN),
(HEARTH DESIGN), COSÌ BREAK BAR,
COSÌ CARD, COSÌ CORNERS,
COSÌ-DILLAS, COSÌ DOWNTOWN,
COSÌ PRONTO, HEARTH-BAKED DINNERS,
RELAX. CATERING BY COSÌ (& DESIGN),
SIMPLY GOOD TASTE, SQUAGELS, GET
COSI, AND XANDO.
We have U.S. Trademark applications pending for the
following trademarks: GET COSÌ, COSÌ
(& Sun & Moon Design), LIFE SHOULD BE
DELICIOUS, (SUN & MOON SMILEY FACE
DESIGN).
COSÌ SANDWICH BAR, ARCTIC,
SLIM LATTE, COSÌ LIGHTER SIDE,
COSÌ DUO TASTE TWO, and (RECYCLING
DESIGN) are unregistered trademarks.
We have registered the trademark COSÌ in 18
foreign jurisdictions with respect to restaurant services. We
also have the following registered trademarks in one foreign
jurisdiction with respect to restaurant services: COSI
(& HEARTH DESIGN), (HEARTH DESIGN), and
SIMPLY GOOD TASTE. We have the following registered
trademarks in three foreign jurisdictions with respect to
restaurant services: (HEARTH DESIGN).
We have trademark applications pending for registration of the
following trademarks with respect to restaurant services:
COSÌ in the European Community and three other
foreign jurisdictions; COSÌ (& HEARTH
DESIGN) in two foreign jurisdictions;
(SUN & MOON DESIGN) in one foreign
jurisdiction; SIMPLY GOOD TASTE in one foreign
jurisdiction; LIFE SHOULD BE DELICIOUS in one
foreign jurisdiction; and (HEARTH DESIGN) in five
foreign jurisdictions.
Governmental
Regulation
Our restaurants are subject to regulation by federal agencies
and to licensing and regulation by state, local and, where
applicable, foreign health, sanitation, building, zoning,
safety, fire and other departments relating to the
7
development and operation of restaurants. These regulations
include matters relating to environmental, building,
construction and zoning requirements, franchising and the
preparation and sale of food and alcoholic beverages. In
addition, our facilities are licensed and subject to regulation
under state and local fire, health and safety codes.
Our restaurants that sell alcoholic beverages are required to
obtain a license from a state authority and, in certain
locations, county
and/or
municipal authorities. Typically, licenses must be renewed
annually and may be revoked or suspended for cause at any time.
Alcoholic beverage control regulations relate to numerous
aspects of the daily operations of each of our restaurants,
including minimum age of patrons and employees, hours of
operation, advertising, wholesale purchasing, inventory control
and handling, and storage and dispensing of alcoholic beverages.
We have not encountered any material problems relating to
alcoholic beverage licenses to date. The failure to receive or
retain a liquor license in a particular location could adversely
affect that restaurant and may impact our ability to obtain such
a license elsewhere.
We are subject to dram shop statutes in the states
in which our restaurants sell alcoholic beverages. These
statutes generally provide a person injured by an intoxicated
person the right to recover damages from an establishment that
wrongfully served alcoholic beverages to the intoxicated
individual. We carry liquor liability coverage as part of our
existing comprehensive general liability insurance, which we
believe is consistent with coverage carried by other
similarly-situated entities in the restaurant industry. Although
we are covered by insurance, a judgment against us under a
dram-shop statute in excess of our liability coverage could have
a material adverse effect on us.
Our operations are also subject to federal and state laws
governing such matters as wages, working conditions, citizenship
requirements, overtime, insurance matters, workers
compensation, child labor laws, and anti-discrimination laws.
Some states have set minimum wage requirements higher than the
federal level. Some of our hourly personnel at our restaurants
are paid at rates based on the applicable minimum wage, and
increases in the minimum wage will directly affect our labor
costs. We are also subject to the Americans with Disabilities
Act of 1990, which, among other things, prohibits discrimination
on the basis of disability in public accommodations and
employment. We are required to comply with the Americans with
Disabilities Act and regulations relating to accommodating the
needs of the disabled in connection with the construction of new
facilities and with significant renovations of existing
facilities.
In recent years, there has been an increased legislative,
regulatory and consumer focus at the federal, state and
municipal levels on the food industry, including nutrition,
labelling and advertising practices. Casual dining chains have
been a particular focus. For example, New York City has adopted
regulations requiring that chain restaurants include caloric or
other nutritional information on their menu boards and on
printed menus, which must be plainly visible to consumers at the
point of ordering. We may in the future become subject to other
initiatives in the area of nutrition disclosure or advertising,
such as requirements to provide information about the
nutritional content of our food, which could increase our
expenses, particularly given differences among applicable legal
requirements and practices within the restaurant industry with
respect to testing and disclosure, or otherwise adversely affect
us.
Risks
Related to Our Growth Strategy
We may
not be able to achieve our planned expansion. If we or our
franchisees are unable to successfully open new restaurants, our
revenue growth rate and profits may be reduced.
To successfully expand our business, we and our franchisees must
open new restaurants on schedule and in a profitable manner. In
the past, we have experienced delays in restaurant openings and
may experience similar delays in the future. Delays or failures
in opening new restaurants could hurt our ability to meet our
growth objectives, which may affect the expectations of
securities analysts and others and thus our stock price. We
cannot guarantee that we or our franchisees will be able to
achieve our expansion goals or that new restaurants will be
operated profitably. Further, any restaurants that we or our
franchisees open may not obtain operating results similar to
those of our existing restaurants. Our ability to expand
successfully will depend on a number of factors, many of which
are beyond our control. These factors include, but are not
limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
locating suitable restaurant sites in new and existing markets;
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
negotiating acceptable lease terms;
|
|
|
|
generating positive cash flow from existing and new restaurants;
|
|
|
|
successful operation and execution in new and existing markets;
|
|
|
|
recruiting, training and retaining qualified corporate and
restaurant personnel and management;
|
|
|
|
attracting and retaining qualified franchisees with sufficient
experience and financial resources to develop and operate our
restaurants successfully;
|
|
|
|
cost effective and timely planning, design and build-out of
restaurants;
|
|
|
|
the reliability of our customer and market studies;
|
|
|
|
the reliability of our site identification studies;
|
|
|
|
consumer trends;
|
|
|
|
obtaining and maintaining required local, state, federal and
where applicable, foreign governmental approvals and permits
related to the construction of the sites and the sale of food
and alcoholic beverages;
|
|
|
|
creating customer awareness of our restaurants in new markets;
|
|
|
|
competition in our markets, both in our business and in locating
suitable restaurant sites;
|
|
|
|
the cost of our principal food products and supply and delivery
shortages or interruptions;
|
|
|
|
weather conditions; and
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions.
|
We
must identify and obtain a sufficient number of suitable new
restaurant sites for us to achieve a sustainable revenue growth
rate.
We require that all proposed restaurant sites, whether
Company-owned or franchised, meet site-selection criteria
established by us. We and our franchisees may not be able to
find sufficient new restaurant sites to support our planned
expansion in future periods. We face significant competition
from other restaurant companies and retailers for sites that
meet our criteria and the supply of sites may be limited in some
markets. As a result of these factors, our costs to obtain and
lease sites may increase, or we may not be able to obtain
certain sites due to unacceptable costs. Our inability to obtain
suitable restaurant sites at reasonable costs may reduce our
growth rate, which may affect the expectations of securities
analysts and others and thus our stock price.
Our
expansion in existing markets can cause sales in some of our
existing restaurants to decline, which could result in
restaurant closures.
As part of our expansion strategy, we and our franchisees intend
to open new restaurants in our existing markets. Since we
typically draw customers from a relatively small radius around
each of our restaurants, the sales performance and customer
counts for restaurants near the area in which a new restaurant
opens may decline due to cannibalization, which could result in
restaurant closures. In addition, new restaurants added in
existing markets may not achieve the same operating performance
as our existing restaurants.
Our
expansion into new markets, both foreign and domestic, may
present increased risks due to our unfamiliarity with the area.
The restaurants we open in new geographic regions may not
achieve market acceptance.
Some of our new franchised restaurants and Company-owned
restaurants are located in areas where we have little or no
meaningful experience. Those markets may have different
demographic characteristics, competitive conditions, consumer
tastes and discretionary spending patterns than our existing
markets that may cause our new restaurants to be less successful
than restaurants in our existing markets. An additional risk in
expansion into new markets is the lack of market awareness of
the
Cosi®
brand. Restaurants opened in new markets may open at lower
9
average weekly sales volumes than restaurants opened in existing
markets and may have higher restaurant-level operating expense
ratios than in existing markets. Sales at restaurants opened in
new markets may take longer to reach mature average annual
Company-owned restaurant sales, if at all, thereby affecting the
profitability of these restaurants.
We have entered into an international license agreement with a
licensee for the development of Cosi restaurants in six
countries in the Persian Gulf. This licensee currently operates
three franchise locations in the United Arab Emirates. As these
franchise locations and future foreign locations open, the
Companys international operations will be subjected to
various factors of uncertainty. The Companys business
outside of the United States is subject to a number of
additional factors, including international economic and
political conditions, local economic conditions, differing
cultures and consumer preferences, currency regulations and
fluctuations, diverse government regulations and tax systems,
uncertain or differing interpretations of rights and obligations
in connection with international license agreements and the
collection of royalties from international licensees, the
availability and cost of land and construction costs, and the
availability of experienced management, appropriate licensees,
and joint venture partners. Although we believe that we have
developed the support structure required for international
growth, there is no assurance that such growth will occur or
that international operations will be profitable.
We may
not be able to successfully incorporate a franchising and area
developer model into our strategy.
We have and will continue to incorporate a franchising and area
developer model into our business strategy in certain selected
markets. We did not use a franchising or area developer model
prior to fiscal 2004, and we may not be as successful as
predicted in attracting franchisees and developers to the Cosi
concept or identifying franchisees and developers that have the
business abilities or access to financial resources necessary to
open our restaurants or to successfully develop or operate our
restaurants in a manner consistent with our standards.
Incorporating a franchising and area developer model into our
strategy also requires us to devote significant management and
financial resources to support the franchise of our restaurants.
Our future performance will depend on our franchisees
ability to execute our concept and capitalize upon our brand
recognition and marketing. We may not be able to recruit
franchisees who have the business abilities or financial
resources necessary to open restaurants on schedule, or who will
conduct operations in a manner consistent with our concept and
standards. Our franchisees may not be able to operate
restaurants in a profitable manner. If we are not successful in
incorporating a franchising or area developer model into our
strategy, we may experience delays in our growth or may not be
able to expand and grow our business.
If our
franchisees cannot develop or finance new restaurants, build
them on suitable sites or open them on schedule, our growth and
success may be impeded.
Our growth depends in large part upon our ability to establish a
successful and effective franchise program and to attract
qualified franchisees. If our franchisees are unable to locate
suitable sites for new restaurants, negotiate acceptable lease
or purchase terms, obtain the necessary financial or management
resources, meet construction schedules or obtain the necessary
permits and government approvals, our growth plans may be
negatively affected. We cannot assure you that any of the
restaurants our franchisees open will be profitable.
Additional
foodservice strategic alliances may not be successful and may
materially adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
We may decide to enter into additional alliances with third
parties to develop foodservice strategic alliances in select
markets or through select channels. Identifying strategic
partners, negotiating agreements and building such alliances may
divert managements attention away from our existing
businesses and growth plans. If we are not successful in forming
additional foodservice strategic alliances, we may experience
delays in our growth and may not be able to expand and grow our
business. If we do form additional strategic alliances, we
cannot assure you that the restaurants opened pursuant to these
strategic alliances will be profitable.
10
Any
inability to manage our growth effectively could materially
adversely affect our operating results.
Failure to manage our growth effectively could harm our
business. We have grown significantly since our inception and
intend to grow substantially in the future both through a
franchising strategy and opening new Company-owned restaurants.
Our existing restaurant management systems, financial and
management controls and information systems may not be adequate
to support our planned expansion. Our ability to manage our
growth effectively will require us to continue to enhance these
systems, procedures and controls. We must attract and retain
talented operating personnel to maintain the quality and service
levels at our existing and future restaurants. We may not be
able to effectively manage these or other aspects of our
expansion. We cannot assure you that we will be able to respond
on a timely basis to all of the changing demands that our
planned expansion will impose on management and on our existing
infrastructure. If we are unable to manage our growth
effectively, our business, results of operations and financial
condition could be materially adversely impacted.
If we
are unable to successfully integrate future acquisitions, our
business could be negatively impacted. Any acquisitions may also
be costly.
We may consider future strategic acquisitions. Acquisitions
involve numerous risks, including difficulties assimilating new
operations and products. In addition, acquisitions may require
significant management time and capital resources. We cannot
assure you that we will have access to the capital required to
finance potential acquisitions on satisfactory terms, that any
acquisition would result in long-term benefits to us, or that
management would be able to manage effectively the resulting
business. Future acquisitions are likely to result in the
incurrence of additional indebtedness, which could contain
restrictive covenants, or the issuance of additional equity
securities, which could dilute our existing stockholders. We may
also pay too much for a concept that we acquire relative to the
actual economic return obtained. If our integration efforts are
unsuccessful, our business and results of operations could
suffer.
Risks
Related to Our Business
If we
are unable to execute our business strategy, we could be
materially adversely affected.
Our ability to successfully execute our business strategy will
depend on a number of factors, some of which are beyond our
control, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to generate positive cash flow from operations;
|
|
|
|
identification and availability of suitable restaurant sites;
|
|
|
|
competition for restaurant sites and customers;
|
|
|
|
negotiation of favorable leases;
|
|
|
|
management of construction and development costs of new and
renovated restaurants;
|
|
|
|
securing required governmental approvals and permits;
|
|
|
|
recruitment and retention of qualified operating personnel;
|
|
|
|
successful operation and execution in new and existing markets;
|
|
|
|
recruiting, training and retaining qualified corporate and
restaurant personnel and management;
|
|
|
|
identification of under-performing restaurants and our ability
to improve or efficiently close under-performing restaurants,
including securing favorable lease termination terms;
|
|
|
|
the rate of our internal growth, and our ability to generate
increased revenue from existing restaurants;
|
|
|
|
our ability to incorporate a franchising and area developer
model into our strategy;
|
|
|
|
competition in new and existing markets;
|
|
|
|
the reliability of our customer and market studies;
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
the impact of the general economic conditions and high
unemployment rates on consumer spending, particularly in
geographic regions that contain a high concentration of our
restaurants;
|
|
|
|
the cost of our principal food products and supply and delivery
shortages or interruptions;
|
|
|
|
changes in commodity costs, labor, supply, fuel, utilities,
distribution and other operating costs;
|
|
|
|
availability of additional capital and financing;
|
|
|
|
weather conditions; and
|
|
|
|
general regional, national and, where applicable, foreign
economic conditions.
|
Each of these factors could delay or prevent us from
successfully executing our business strategy, which could
adversely affect our growth, revenues and our results of
operations.
During
our operating history, we have been unable to achieve
profitability.
In fiscal 2009, we incurred net losses of $11.1 million,
and, since we were formed, we have incurred net losses of
approximately $267.8 million through the end of fiscal 2009
primarily due to funding operating losses which have included
significant impairment charges, the cost of our merger in 1999
and new restaurant opening expenses. We intend to continue to
expend significant financial and management resources on the
development of additional restaurants, both franchised and
Company-owned. We cannot predict whether we will be able to
achieve or sustain revenue growth, profitability or positive
cash flow in the future. See Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of
Operations and the financial statements included in this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for information on the history of our losses.
If
internally generated cash flow from our restaurants does not
meet our expectations, our business, results of operations and
financial condition could be materially adversely
affected.
Our cash resources, and therefore our liquidity, are highly
dependent upon the level of internally generated cash from
operations and upon future financing transactions. Although we
believe that we have sufficient liquidity to fund our working
capital requirements for the next twelve months, if cash flows
from our existing restaurants or cash flows from new restaurants
that we open or franchise fees and royalties do not meet our
expectations or are otherwise insufficient to satisfy our cash
needs, we may have to seek additional financing from external
sources to continue funding our operations or reduce or cease
our plans to open or franchise new restaurants. We cannot
predict whether such financing will be available on terms
acceptable to us, or at all.
We may
need additional capital in the future and it may not be
available on acceptable terms.
Our business has in the past required, and may continue to
require, significant additional capital to, among other things,
fund our operations, increase the number of Company-owned or
franchised restaurants, expand the range of services we offer
and finance future acquisitions and investments. There is no
assurance that financing will be available on terms acceptable
to us, or at all. Our ability to obtain additional financing
will be subject to a number of factors, including market
conditions, our operating performance and investor sentiment.
These factors may make the timing, amount, terms and conditions
of additional financings unattractive to us. If we are unable to
raise additional capital, our business, results of operations
and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
The
current economic recession could adversely affect our business
and financial results and have a material adverse effect on our
liquidity and capital resources.
If the economic recession continues, many sectors of the economy
may continue to be adversely impacted. As a retailer that
depends upon consumer discretionary spending, we could face a
challenging fiscal 2010, because our customers may make fewer
discretionary purchases as a result of job losses, foreclosures,
bankruptcies, reduced access to credit and sharply falling home
prices. Many of the effects and consequences of the financial
crisis and a broader global economic downturn are currently
unknown and any one or all of them could potentially have a
material adverse effect on our liquidity and capital resources,
including our ability to raise additional capital if needed or
to maintain satisfactory credit terms with our suppliers. Cosi,
as an affordable luxury, may be
12
disproportionally affected by a continued slowdown in the United
States economy or an uncertain economic outlook.
Seasonality,
inclement weather and other variable factors may adversely
affect our sales and results of operations and could cause our
quarterly results to fluctuate and fall below expectations of
securities analysts and investors, resulting in a decline in our
stock price.
Our business is subject to significant seasonal fluctuations and
weather influences on consumer spending and dining out patterns.
Inclement weather may result in reduced frequency of dining at
our restaurants. Customer counts (and consequently revenues) are
generally highest in spring and summer months and lowest during
the winter months because of the high proportion of our
restaurants located in the Northern part of the country where
inclement winter weather affects customer visits. As a result,
our quarterly and yearly results have varied in the past, and we
believe that our quarterly operating results will vary in the
future. Other factors such as unanticipated increases in labor,
commodities, energy, insurance or other operating costs may also
cause our quarterly results to fluctuate. For this reason, you
should not rely upon our quarterly operating results as
indications of future performance.
Our
franchisees could take actions that could harm our
business.
Franchisees are independent operators and are not our employees.
Although we have developed criteria to evaluate and screen
prospective franchisees, we are limited in the amount of control
we can exercise over our franchisees, and the quality of
franchised restaurant operations may be diminished by any number
of factors beyond our control. Franchisees may not have the
business acumen or financial resources necessary to successfully
operate restaurants in a manner consistent with our standards
and requirements and may not hire and train qualified managers
and other restaurant personnel. Poor restaurant operations may
affect each restaurants sales. Our image and reputation,
and the image and reputation of other franchisees, may suffer
materially and system-wide sales could significantly decline if
our franchisees do not operate successfully.
We
could face liability from our franchisees.
A franchisee or government agency may bring legal action against
us based on the franchisee/franchisor relationships. Various
state, federal and, where applicable, foreign laws govern our
relationship with our franchisees and potential sales of our
franchised restaurants. If we fail to comply with these laws, we
could be liable for damages to franchisees and fines or other
penalties. Expensive litigation with our franchisees or
government agencies may adversely affect both our profits and
our important relations with our franchisees.
Our
financial results are affected by the financial results of our
franchisees.
We receive royalties from our franchisees. Our financial results
are therefore to an extent contingent upon the operational and
financial success of our franchisees, including implementation
of our strategic plans, as well as their ability to secure
adequate financing. If sales trends or economic conditions
worsen for our franchisees, their financial health may worsen
and our collection rates may decline. Additionally, refusal on
the part of franchisees to renew their franchise agreements may
result in decreased royalties. Entering into restructured
franchise agreements may result in reduced franchise royalty
rates in the future.
Our
restaurants are currently concentrated in the Northeastern and
Mid-Atlantic regions of the United States, particularly in
the New York City and Washington, D.C. areas. Accordingly,
we are highly vulnerable to negative occurrences in these
regions.
We currently operate 68 Company-owned restaurants in
Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic states, of which 30 are located in
the New York City and Washington, D.C. central business
districts. As a result, we are particularly susceptible to
adverse trends and economic conditions in these areas. In
addition, given our geographical concentration, negative
publicity regarding any of our restaurants could have a material
adverse effect on our business and operations, as could other
regional occurrences impacting the local economies in these
markets.
13
You
should not rely on past increases in our average unit volumes as
an indication of our future results of operations because they
may fluctuate significantly.
A number of factors have historically affected, and will
continue to affect, our average unit sales, including, among
other factors:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to execute our business and growth strategy
effectively;
|
|
|
|
success of promotional and marketing initiatives including
advertising and new product and concept development;
|
|
|
|
sales performance by our new and existing restaurants;
|
|
|
|
management turnover in the restaurants;
|
|
|
|
competition;
|
|
|
|
general regional, national and where applicable, foreign
economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
weather conditions; and
|
|
|
|
the impact of the general economic conditions and high
unemployment rates on consumer spending, particularly in
geographic regions that contain a high concentration of our
restaurants .
|
It is not reasonable to expect our average unit volumes to
increase at rates achieved over the past several years. Changes
in our average unit volumes could cause the price of our common
stock to fluctuate substantially.
Our
common stock may be delisted from the Nasdaq Global Market,
which could have an adverse impact on the liquidity and market
price of our common stock.
Our common stock is currently listed on The Nasdaq Global
Market. On September 15, 2009, we received notice from the
Listing Qualifications Department of The Nasdaq Stock Market
(Nasdaq) indicating that, for the previous 30
consecutive business days, the bid price for our common stock
had closed below the minimum $1.00 per share requirement for
continued inclusion on the Nasdaq Global Market under Nasdaq
Listing Rule 5450(a)(1) and that we would be afforded 180
calendar days, or until March 15, 2010, to regain
compliance with the minimum bid price requirement. On
March 16, 2010, we received a letter from the Nasdaq staff
stating that we had failed to comply with the $1.00 minimum bid
price required for continued listing of our common stock on The
Nasdaq Global Market and as a result our common stock is subject
to delisting. We have appealed the staff determination and the
delisting of our common stock has been stayed pending the Nasdaq
Listing Qualifications Panels determination of our appeal.
Although there can be no assurance that the Panel will grant our
request for continued listing, the appeal will stay the
delisting of our stock from The Nasdaq Global Market pending the
Panels decision. We intend to present a plan to the panel
that includes a discussion of the events that we believe will
enable us to regain compliance with Nasdaq Listing
Rule 5450(a)(1), which plan will include a commitment to
effect a reverse stock split, if necessary. Alternatively, we
may be eligible for an additional grace period if we satisfy all
of the requirements, other than the minimum bid price
requirement, for initial listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market
set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5505. To avail ourselves
of this alternative, we would need to submit an application to
transfer our securities to the Nasdaq Capital Market.
The delisting of our common stock would adversely affect the
market liquidity for our common stock, the per share price of
our common stock and impair our ability to raise capital that
may be needed for future operations. Delisting from the Nasdaq
Global Market could also have other negative results, including,
without limitation, the potential loss of confidence by
customers and employees, the loss of institutional investor
interest and fewer business development opportunities. If our
common stock is not eligible for quotation on another market or
exchange, trading of our common stock could be conducted in the
over-the-counter
market or on an electronic bulletin board established for
unlisted securities such as the Pink Sheets or the OTC
Bulletin Board. In such event, it could become more
difficult to dispose of, or obtain accurate quotations for the
price of our common stock, and there would likely also be a
reduction in our coverage by security analysts and the news
media, which could cause the price of our common stock to
decline further.
14
If we
fail to comply with governmental regulations or if these
regulations change, our business could suffer.
We are subject to extensive federal, state, local, and, where
applicable, foreign government regulations, including
regulations relating to alcoholic beverage control, the
preparation and sale of food, public health and safety,
sanitation, building, zoning and fire codes. Our operations are
also subject to federal and state laws governing such matters as
wages, working conditions, citizenship requirements, overtime,
insurance matters, workers compensation, disability laws
such as the Americans with Disabilities Act, child labor laws
and anti-discrimination laws. Although we believe that
compliance with these laws has not had a material effect on our
operations to date, we may experience material difficulties or
failures with respect to compliance in the future. Our failure
to comply with these laws could result in required renovations
to our facilities, litigation, fines, penalties, judgments or
other sanctions, any of which could adversely affect our
business, operations or our reputation.
In recent years, there has been an increased legislative,
regulatory and consumer focus at the federal, state and
municipal levels on the food industry, including nutrition,
labeling and advertising practices. Casual dining chains have
been a particular focus. For example, New York City has adopted
regulations requiring that chain restaurants include caloric or
other nutritional information on their menu boards and on
printed menus, which must be plainly visible to consumers at the
point of ordering. We may in the future become subject to other
initiatives in the area of nutrition disclosure or advertising,
such as requirements to provide information about the
nutritional content of our food, which could increase our
expenses, particularly given differences among applicable legal
requirements and practices within the restaurant industry with
respect to testing and disclosure, or otherwise adversely affect
us. See Business Government Regulation
in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for a discussion of the regulations with which we must comply.
Our
operations depend upon governmental licenses and we may face
liability under dram shop statutes.
Our business depends upon obtaining and maintaining required
food service
and/or
liquor licenses for each of our restaurants. If we fail to
obtain or maintain all necessary licenses, we may be forced to
delay or cancel new restaurant openings and close or reduce
operations at existing locations. In addition, our sale of
alcoholic beverages subjects us to dram shop
statutes in some states. These statutes allow an injured person
to recover damages from an establishment that served alcoholic
beverages to an intoxicated person. Although we take significant
precautions to ensure that all employees are trained in the
responsible service of alcohol and maintain insurance policies
in accordance with all state regulations regarding the sale of
alcoholic beverages, the misuse of alcoholic beverages by
customers may create considerable risks for us. If we are the
subject of a judgment substantially in excess of our insurance
coverage, or if we fail to maintain our insurance coverage, our
business, financial condition, operating results or cash flows
could be materially and adversely affected.
Our
failure or inability to enforce our trademarks or other
proprietary rights could adversely affect our competitive
position or the value of our brand.
We own certain common law trademark rights and a number of
federal and international trademark and service mark
registrations, and proprietary rights to certain of our core
menu offerings. We believe that our trademarks and other
proprietary rights are important to our success and our
competitive position. We, therefore, devote appropriate
resources to the protection of our trademarks and proprietary
rights. The protective actions that we take, however, may not be
enough to prevent unauthorized usage or imitation by others,
which might cause us to incur significant litigation costs and
could harm our image or our brand or competitive position.
We also cannot assure you that third parties will not claim that
our trademarks or offerings infringe the proprietary rights of
third parties. Any such claim, whether or not it has merit,
could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, cause
product delays or require us to enter into royalty or licensing
agreements. As a result, any such claim could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
We
hold significant amounts of illiquid assets and may have to
dispose of them on unfavorable terms.
As of the end of fiscal 2009, we had $22.1 million in net
fixed assets that we have defined as illiquid assets, which
includes leasehold improvements, equipment and furniture and
fixtures. These assets cannot be converted
15
into cash quickly and easily. We may be compelled, based on a
significant underperformance of a specific location or market,
to dispose of some illiquid assets on unfavorable terms, which
could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We may
face litigation that could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of
operations.
From time to time, we are a defendant in litigation arising in
the ordinary course of our business. Our customers may file
complaints or lawsuits against us alleging that we are
responsible for an illness or injury they suffered at or after a
visit to a
Cosi®
restaurant, or alleging that there was a problem with food
quality or operations at a
Cosi®
restaurant. We may also be subject to a variety of other claims
arising in the ordinary course of our business, including
personal injury claims, contract claims, claims from franchisees
and claims alleging violations of federal, state and, where
applicable, foreign law regarding workplace and employment
matters, discrimination and similar matters. We could also
become subject to class action lawsuits related to these matters
in the future.
Regardless of whether any future claims against us are valid or
whether we are found to be liable, claims may be expensive to
defend and may divert our managements attention away from
our operations and hurt our performance. The outcome of
litigation, particularly class action lawsuits and regulatory
actions, is difficult to assess or quantify. Plaintiffs in these
types of lawsuits may seek recovery of very large or
indeterminate amounts, and the magnitude of the potential loss
relating to such lawsuits may remain unknown for substantial
periods of time. A judgment significantly in excess of our
insurance coverage for any claims could materially adversely
affect our financial condition or results of operations. There
may also be adverse publicity associated with litigation that
could decrease customer acceptance of our services or those of
our franchisees, regardless of whether the allegations are valid
or whether we are ultimately found liable. As a result,
litigation may have a material adverse affect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations. Moreover,
complaints, litigation or adverse publicity experienced by one
or more of our franchisees could also hurt our business as a
whole.
If we
are unable to protect our customers credit card data, we
could be exposed to data loss, litigation and liability, and our
reputation could be significantly harmed.
In connection with credit card sales, we transmit confidential
credit card information securely over public networks. Third
parties may have the technology or know-how to breach the
security of this customer information, and our security measures
may not effectively prohibit others from obtaining improper
access to this information. If a person is able to circumvent
our security measures, he or she could destroy or steal valuable
information or disrupt our operations. Any security breach could
expose us to risks of data loss, litigation and liability and
could seriously disrupt our operations and any resulting
negative publicity could significantly harm our reputation.
We
rely on computer systems and information technology to run our
business. Any material failure, interruption or security breach
of our computer systems or information technology may adversely
affect the operation of the business and our results of
operations.
Computer viruses or terrorism may disrupt our operations and
harm our operating results. Despite our implementation of
security measures, all of our technology systems are vulnerable
to disability or failures due to hacking, viruses, acts of war
or terrorism, and other causes. If our technology systems were
to fail and we were unable to recover in a timely way, we would
be unable to fulfill critical business functions, which could
have a material adverse effect on our business, operating
results, and financial condition.
Risks
Relating to the Food Service Industry
Our
business is affected by changes in consumer
preferences.
Our success depends, in part, upon the popularity of our food
and beverage products, our ability to develop new menu items
that appeal to consumers and what we believe is an emerging
trend in consumer preferences toward premium convenience
restaurants. We depend on consumers who prefer
made-to-order
food in a sophisticated environment and are willing to pay a
premium price for our products. We also depend on trends toward
consumers eating away from home more often. Shifts in consumer
preferences away from our restaurants or cuisine, our
16
inability to develop new menu items that appeal to consumers or
changes in our menu that eliminate items popular with some
consumers could harm our business and future profitability.
Natural
disasters, war, acts of terrorism or other armed conflict, or
the threat of such actions, on the United States or
international economies may cause a decline in discretionary
consumer spending, which would negatively affect our
business.
Our success depends to a significant extent on discretionary
consumer spending, which is influenced by general economic and
political conditions and the availability of discretionary
income. Discretionary consumer spending may decline in the event
of a natural disaster, war, acts of terrorism or other armed
conflict. Accordingly, we may experience declines in sales
during periods of uncertainty like that which followed the
September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States.
In addition, economic uncertainty due to military action
overseas, such as in Iraq and post-war military, diplomatic or
financial responses, may lead to further declines in sales. Any
decline in consumer spending or economic conditions could reduce
customer traffic or impose practical limits on pricing, either
of which could have a material adverse effect on our sales,
results of operations, business and financial condition. In the
event of a natural disaster or acts of terrorism in the United
States, or the threat of either, we may be required to suspend
operations in some or all of our restaurants, which could have a
material adverse impact on our business, financial condition,
and results of operation.
Our
success depends on our ability to compete with many food service
businesses.
The restaurant industry is intensely competitive and we compete
with many well-established food service companies on the basis
of taste, quality and price of product offered, customer
service, atmosphere, location and overall customer experience.
We compete with other sandwich retailers, specialty coffee
retailers, bagel shops, fast-food restaurants, delicatessens,
cafes, bars, take-out food service companies, supermarkets and
convenience stores. Our competitors change with each daypart
(breakfast, lunch and dinner), ranging from coffee bars and
bakery cafes during the breakfast and lunch dayparts to casual
dining chains during the dinner daypart. Aggressive pricing by
our competitors or the entrance of new competitors into our
markets could reduce our sales and profit margins.
Many of our competitors or potential competitors have
substantially greater financial and other resources than we do,
which may allow them to react to changes in pricing, marketing
and the quick-service restaurant industry better than we can. As
competitors expand their operations, we expect competition to
intensify. We also compete with other employers in our markets
for hourly workers and may be subject to higher labor costs.
Changes
in food and supply costs and availability could adversely affect
our results of operations.
Our restaurants receive frequent deliveries of products. Most of
these deliveries are made by distributors who are part of a
national network of independent distributors with whom we have a
distribution agreement. These independent distributors supply us
with approximately 78% of our food and paper products under an
agreement which expires in November 2010. Although we have
issued a request for proposal to several distribution
organizations, there can be no assurance that any agreement will
be reached prior to expiration of our current agreement. Our
profitability depends in part on our ability to anticipate and
react to changes in food and supply costs, such as the
volatility in certain commodity markets we experienced in recent
years. Certain commodities such as wheat and dairy and
dairy-related products have experienced significant fluctuations
in the recent past. These types of increases could have an
adverse effect on us during fiscal 2010 and in future fiscal
years. Although many of our products are made to our
specifications, we believe that alternative distribution sources
are available for the majority of our ingredients and products.
We believe that we have adequate sources of supply for our
ingredients and products to support our restaurant operations
and if necessary we can make menu modifications to address any
material supply issues. However, there are many factors which
can cause shortages or interruptions in the supply of our
ingredients and products including weather, unanticipated
demand, labor, production or distribution problems, quality
issues and cost, some of which are beyond our control, and any
of which could have an adverse effect on our business and
results of operations.
17
Health
concerns relating to the consumption of beef, poultry, produce
or other food products could adversely affect the price and
availability of beef, poultry, produce, and other food products,
consumer preferences and our results of operations and stock
price.
Since 2004, Asian and European countries have experienced
outbreaks of avian flu, or bird flu. Additional
instances of avian flu or other food-borne illnesses, such as
mad cow disease, E.coli, salmonella, or hepatitis A
could adversely affect the price and availability of beef,
poultry or other food products. As a result, we could experience
a significant increase in cost of food.
In addition, like other restaurant chains, consumer preferences
could be affected by health concerns about the consumption of
poultry, beef, or produce, the key ingredients in many of our
menu items, or by negative publicity concerning food quality,
illness and injury generally, such as negative publicity
concerning, E.coli, salmonella, mad cow disease or
bird flu, publication of government or industry
findings about food products we serve or other health concerns
or operating issues stemming from the food served in our
restaurants. Our operational controls and training may not be
fully effective in preventing all food-borne illnesses. Some
food-borne illness incidents could be caused by food suppliers
and transporters and would be outside of our control. If our
food suppliers and transporters do not comply with governmental
health regulations, they may not be able to deliver food
products or we may be subject to food product recalls. Any
negative publicity, health concerns or specific outbreaks of
food-borne illnesses attributed to one or more of our
restaurants, or the perception of an outbreak, could result in a
decrease in customer traffic to our restaurants and could have a
material adverse effect on our sales, results of operations,
business, financial condition and stock price.
The
food service industry is affected by litigation and publicity
concerning food quality, health and other issues, which can
cause customers to avoid our products and result in
liabilities.
Food service businesses can be adversely affected by litigation
and complaints from customers or government authorities
resulting from food quality, illness, injury or other health
concerns or operating issues stemming from one restaurant or a
limited number of restaurants. Adverse publicity about these
allegations may negatively affect us, regardless of whether the
allegations are true, by discouraging customers from buying our
products. We could also incur significant liabilities if a
lawsuit or claim results in a decision against us or if we incur
litigation costs, regardless of the result.
Our
business could be adversely affected by increased labor costs or
labor shortages.
Labor is a primary component in the cost of operating our
business. We devote significant resources to recruiting and
training our managers and employees. Increased labor costs, due
to competition, increased minimum wage or employee benefits
costs or otherwise, would adversely impact our operating
expenses. In addition, our success depends on our ability to
attract, motivate and retain qualified employees, including
restaurant managers and staff, to keep pace with our needs. If
we are unable to do so, our results of operations may be
adversely affected.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
We have received no written comments regarding our periodic or
current reports from the staff of the Securities and Exchange
Commission that were issued 180 days or more preceding the
end of our 2009 fiscal year and that remain unresolved.
Our principal executive offices are located at 1751 Lake Cook
Road, Suite 600, Deerfield, Illinois 60015. The lease for
our executive offices expires in September 2012. We believe the
offices are adequate to accommodate our needs.
All of our restaurants are located on leased properties. Each
lease typically has a
10-year base
rent period, with various renewal options. In addition to the
base rent, some leases provide for contingent rental payments,
insurance, common area, and other operating costs. At most
locations, we reimburse the landlord for a proportionate share
of the landlords annual real estate taxes.
18
The following table lists existing Company-owned restaurants, by
region, as of December 28, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Street Address
|
|
City
|
|
Date Opened
|
|
Format
|
|
MIDATLANTIC
|
234 South 15th Street
|
|
Philadelphia, PA
|
|
September-96
|
|
Cosi
|
325 Chestnut Street
|
|
Philadelphia, PA
|
|
April-97
|
|
Cosi
|
1350 Connecticut Avenue
|
|
Washington, DC
|
|
September-97
|
|
Cosi
|
1128 Walnut Street
|
|
Philadelphia, PA
|
|
December-97
|
|
Cosi
|
1647 20th Street NW
|
|
Washington, DC
|
|
August-98
|
|
Cosi
|
140 South 36th Street
|
|
Philadelphia, PA
|
|
August-98
|
|
Cosi
|
761 Lancaster Avenue
|
|
Bryn Mawr, PA
|
|
September-98
|
|
Cosi
|
301 Pennsylvania Avenue SE
|
|
Washington, DC
|
|
March-99
|
|
Cosi
|
2050 Wilson Boulevard
|
|
Arlington, VA
|
|
April-99
|
|
Cosi
|
1700 Pennsylvania Avenue
|
|
Washington, DC
|
|
August-99
|
|
Cosi Downtown
|
1700 Market Street
|
|
Philadelphia, PA
|
|
September-99
|
|
Cosi Downtown
|
700 King Street
|
|
Alexandria, VA
|
|
May-00
|
|
Cosi
|
700 11th Street
|
|
Washington, DC
|
|
May-00
|
|
Cosi
|
4250 Fairfax Drive
|
|
Arlington, VA
|
|
June-00
|
|
Cosi
|
1919 M Street
|
|
Washington, DC
|
|
September-00
|
|
Cosi
|
201 South 18th Street
|
|
Philadelphia, PA
|
|
October-00
|
|
Cosi
|
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
|
|
Washington, DC
|
|
October-00
|
|
Cosi Downtown
|
7251 Woodmont Avenue
|
|
Bethesda, MD
|
|
December-00
|
|
Cosi
|
11909 Democracy Drive
|
|
Reston, VA
|
|
May-01
|
|
Cosi
|
4074 The Strand West
|
|
Columbus, OH
|
|
October-01
|
|
Cosi
|
1501 K Street NW
|
|
Washington, DC
|
|
December-01
|
|
Cosi Downtown
|
1875 K Street
|
|
Washington, DC
|
|
July-02
|
|
Cosi Downtown
|
6390 Sawmill Road
|
|
Columbus, OH
|
|
September-02
|
|
Cosi
|
601 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
|
|
Washington, DC
|
|
September-02
|
|
Cosi
|
1275 K Street
|
|
Washington, DC
|
|
September-02
|
|
Cosi
|
2212 East Main Street
|
|
Bexley, OH
|
|
September-02
|
|
Cosi
|
1478 Bethel Road
|
|
Columbus, OH
|
|
November-02
|
|
Cosi
|
295 Main Street
|
|
Exton, PA
|
|
November-02
|
|
Cosi
|
7166 N. High Street
|
|
Worthington, OH
|
|
December-02
|
|
Cosi
|
5252 Wisconsin Ave, NW
|
|
Washington, DC
|
|
December-02
|
|
Cosi
|
177 Kentlands Blvd
|
|
Gaithersburg, MD
|
|
January-03
|
|
Cosi
|
1333 H Street, NW
|
|
Washington DC
|
|
January-03
|
|
Cosi Downtown
|
1310 Polaris Parkway
|
|
Columbus, OH
|
|
February-03
|
|
Cosi
|
1801 N. Lynn Street
|
|
Arlington, VA
|
|
November-05
|
|
Cosi
|
4025 Welsh Road
|
|
Willow Grove, PA
|
|
December-05
|
|
Cosi
|
50 Yorktown Plaza
|
|
Elkins Park, PA
|
|
April-06
|
|
Cosi
|
833 Chestnut
|
|
Philadelphia, PA
|
|
June-06
|
|
Cosi
|
9177 Reisterstown Road
|
|
Owing Mills, MD
|
|
June-06
|
|
Cosi
|
424 West Swedesford Road
|
|
Berwyn, PA
|
|
June-06
|
|
Cosi
|
100 South Charles
|
|
Baltimore, MD
|
|
July-06
|
|
Cosi
|
513 West Broad Street
|
|
Falls Church, VA
|
|
October-06
|
|
Cosi
|
3503 Fairfax Drive, Suite 200
|
|
Arlington, VA
|
|
November-06
|
|
Cosi
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Street Address
|
|
City
|
|
Date Opened
|
|
Format
|
|
201 N. Washington #290
|
|
Rockville, MD
|
|
March-07
|
|
Cosi
|
2955 Market St.
|
|
Philadelphia, PA
|
|
July-07
|
|
Cosi
|
2011 Crystal Drive, ste 100
|
|
Arlington, VA
|
|
May-08
|
|
Cosi
|
MIDWEST
|
116 S. Michigan Avenue
|
|
Chicago, IL
|
|
September-00
|
|
Cosi
|
55 E. Grand Street
|
|
Chicago, IL
|
|
October-00
|
|
Cosi
|
230 W. Washington Street
|
|
Chicago, IL
|
|
November-00
|
|
Cosi Downtown
|
203 North LaSalle Street
|
|
Chicago, IL
|
|
May-01
|
|
Cosi Downtown
|
301 South State Street
|
|
Ann Arbor, MI
|
|
May-01
|
|
Cosi
|
1101 Lake Street
|
|
Oak Park, IL
|
|
June-01
|
|
Cosi
|
101 North Old Woodward Avenue
|
|
Birmingham, MI
|
|
August-01
|
|
Cosi
|
25 E. Hinsdale
|
|
Hinsdale, IL
|
|
December-01
|
|
Cosi
|
8775 N. Port Washington Road
|
|
Fox Point, WI
|
|
December-01
|
|
Cosi
|
230 West Monroe Street
|
|
Chicago, IL
|
|
May-02
|
|
Cosi Downtown
|
301 East Grand River Avenue
|
|
East Lansing, MI
|
|
May-02
|
|
Cosi
|
84 W. Adams Road
|
|
Rochester Hills, MI
|
|
September-02
|
|
Cosi
|
28674 Telegraph Road
|
|
Southfield, MI
|
|
November-02
|
|
Cosi
|
37652 Twelve Mile Road
|
|
Farmington Hills, MI
|
|
December-02
|
|
Cosi
|
15131 LaGrange Road
|
|
Orland Park, IL
|
|
December-02
|
|
Cosi
|
233 North Michigan Avenue
|
|
Chicago, IL
|
|
December-02
|
|
Cosi Downtown
|
33 N Dearborn
|
|
Chicago, IL
|
|
June-05
|
|
Cosi Downtown
|
1740 Sherman Avenue
|
|
Evanston, IL
|
|
September-05
|
|
Cosi
|
18 West 066 22nd Street
|
|
Oak Brook Terrace, IL
|
|
August-06
|
|
Cosi
|
2200 North Clark
|
|
Chicago, IL
|
|
August-06
|
|
Cosi
|
8310 Greenway Boulevard, #106
|
|
Middleton, WI
|
|
September-06
|
|
Cosi
|
250 State Street
|
|
Madison, WI
|
|
September-06
|
|
Cosi
|
910 North Milwaukee Avenue, Suite A
|
|
Lincolnshire, IL
|
|
November-06
|
|
Cosi
|
Crystal Court Ste 150, 710 Marquette Ave
|
|
Minneapolis, MN
|
|
March-09
|
|
Cosi
|
2100 Patriot Blvd
|
|
Glenview, IL
|
|
September-09
|
|
Cosi
|
NORTHEAST
|
257 Park Avenue South
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
February-97
|
|
Cosi
|
38 East 45th Street
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
February-97
|
|
Cosi Downtown
|
11 West 42nd Street
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
June-97
|
|
Cosi Downtown
|
60 East 56th Street
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
September-97
|
|
Cosi Downtown
|
3 World Financial Center
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
January-98
|
|
Cosi Downtown
|
55 Broad Street
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
March-98
|
|
Cosi Downtown
|
1633 Broadway
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
July-98
|
|
Cosi Downtown
|
61 West 48th Street
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
August-98
|
|
Cosi Downtown
|
685 Third Avenue
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
June-99
|
|
Cosi Downtown
|
970 Farmington Avenue
|
|
W. Hartford, CT
|
|
August-99
|
|
Cosi
|
461 Park Avenue South
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
January-00
|
|
Cosi
|
50 Purchase Street
|
|
Rye, NY
|
|
March-00
|
|
Cosi
|
841 Broadway
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
September-00
|
|
Cosi
|
15 S. Moger Avenue
|
|
Mt. Kisco, NY
|
|
December-00
|
|
Cosi
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Street Address
|
|
City
|
|
Date Opened
|
|
Format
|
|
77 Quaker Ridge Road
|
|
New Rochelle, NY
|
|
November-01
|
|
Cosi
|
1298 Boston Post Road
|
|
Larchmont, NY
|
|
December-01
|
|
Cosi
|
471 Mount Pleasant Road
|
|
Livingston, NJ
|
|
September-02
|
|
Cosi
|
29 Washington Street
|
|
Morristown, NJ
|
|
December-02
|
|
Cosi
|
385 West Main Street
|
|
Avon, CT
|
|
December-02
|
|
Cosi
|
498 7th Avenue
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
December-02
|
|
Cosi
|
700 6th Avenue
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
February-03
|
|
Cosi
|
980 Boston Post Road
|
|
Darien, CT
|
|
October-05
|
|
Cosi
|
129 West Putnam Avenue
|
|
Greenwich, CT
|
|
February-06
|
|
Cosi
|
441 South Oyster Bay Road
|
|
Plainview, NY
|
|
June-06
|
|
Cosi
|
1209 High Ridge Road
|
|
Stamford, CT
|
|
July-06
|
|
Cosi
|
44 Great Neck Road
|
|
Great Neck, NY
|
|
July-06
|
|
Cosi
|
53 E. 8th St.
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
April-07
|
|
Cosi
|
2186 Broadway
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
June-07
|
|
Cosi
|
230 Tresser Blvd. Ste 005
|
|
Stamford, CT
|
|
November-07
|
|
Cosi
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
From time to time, we are a defendant in litigation arising in
the ordinary course of our business, including but not limited
to, claims resulting from slip and fall accidents,
claims under federal and state laws governing access to public
accommodations or other federal and state laws applicable to our
business operations, employment-related claims, property
damages, claims from guests alleging illness, injury or other
food quality, health or operational concerns, and enforcement of
intellectual property rights.
On February 23, 2009, the Company commenced an action in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of
New York to recover, under Section 16(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, short-swing profits realized
by a stockholder of the Company in connection with certain
purchases and sales of the Companys common stock by the
stockholder. On July 7, 2009, the parties entered into an
agreement to settle the claims, which agreement was subject to
court approval. The parties reached a settlement and the Company
received a settlement of $0.4 million.
21
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, STOCK AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES
|
On November 22, 2002, our common stock began trading on the
Nasdaq Global Market System (Nasdaq) under the
symbol COSI. The closing price of our common stock
on Nasdaq was $0.89 on March 25, 2009. On March 16,
2010, we were notified by The Nasdaq Stock Market that our
common stock is subject to delisting from the Nasdaq Global
Market. We have appealed this determination and the delisting
has been stayed pending the outcome of the appeal.
Stock
Price Information
Set forth below are the high and low closing sale prices for
shares of our common stock for each quarter during fiscal 2009
and 2008 as reported by Nasdaq.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
Fiscal Quarter
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
3.14
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
3.15
|
|
|
$
|
2.23
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
2.85
|
|
|
$
|
1.57
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
$
|
1.97
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
Stockholders
The number of our registered common stockholders of record as of
February 26, 2010 was 90. This number excludes stockholders
whose stock is held in nominee or street name by brokers.
Dividend
Policy
We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock, and we do
not currently intend to pay any dividends.
22
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans
The information relating to securities authorized for issuance
under our equity compensation plans is disclosed in Item 11
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Set forth below is a graph comparing the cumulative total
stockholder return on Cosìs common stock with the
NASDAQ Composite Index and the Standard & Poors
Small Cap 600 Index for the period covering our initial public
offering on November 22, 2002, through the end of our 2009
fiscal year on December 28, 2009. The Companys common
stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol
COSI. The graph assumes an investment of $100.00
made at the opening of trading on November 22, 2002, in
(i) Cosìs common stock, (ii) the stocks
comprising the NASDAQ Composite Index, and (iii) stocks
comprising the Standard & Poors Small Cap 600
Index.
Cummulative
Total Return
23
|
|
Item 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
The following table sets forth our summary of selected
consolidated financial data, which should be read in conjunction
with Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our
audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes
included elsewhere in this Report. The selected statement of
operations data for fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007 and selected
balance sheet data for fiscal 2009 and 2008 are derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements that are included in
this Report. The following historical results of consolidated
operations are not necessarily indicative of results to be
expected for any subsequent period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurant net sales
|
|
$
|
116,375
|
|
|
$
|
132,501
|
|
|
$
|
132,414
|
|
|
$
|
122,849
|
|
|
$
|
114,036
|
|
Franchise fees and royalties
|
|
|
2,198
|
|
|
|
3,078
|
|
|
|
2,142
|
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenus
|
|
|
118,573
|
|
|
|
135,579
|
|
|
|
134,556
|
|
|
|
123,698
|
|
|
|
114,137
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of food and beverage
|
|
|
26,429
|
|
|
|
30,235
|
|
|
|
30,972
|
|
|
|
28,170
|
|
|
|
27,104
|
|
Restaurant labor and related benefits
|
|
|
42,742
|
|
|
|
45,375
|
|
|
|
45,995
|
|
|
|
40,782
|
|
|
|
37,264
|
|
Occupancy and other restaurant operating expenses
|
|
|
36,617
|
|
|
|
39,821
|
|
|
|
38,369
|
|
|
|
32,045
|
|
|
|
27,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,788
|
|
|
|
115,431
|
|
|
|
115,336
|
|
|
|
100,997
|
|
|
|
92,094
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
15,044
|
|
|
|
19,966
|
|
|
|
22,973
|
|
|
|
26,887
|
|
|
|
24,265
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,050
|
|
|
|
8,409
|
|
|
|
8,823
|
|
|
|
7,196
|
|
|
|
6,516
|
|
Restaurant pre-opening expenses
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
|
824
|
|
Provision for losses on asset impairments and disposals
|
|
|
1,530
|
|
|
|
7,099
|
|
|
|
3,845
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
Closed store costs
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease termination expense (benefit), net
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(482
|
)
|
|
|
(1,432
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
129,693
|
|
|
|
151,625
|
|
|
|
152,273
|
|
|
|
136,066
|
|
|
|
122,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(11,120
|
)
|
|
|
(16,046
|
)
|
|
|
(17,717
|
)
|
|
|
(12,368
|
)
|
|
|
(8,626
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
1,411
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Allowance for notes receivable from stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
|
|
1,479
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(11,104
|
)
|
|
|
(15,910
|
)
|
|
|
(16,530
|
)
|
|
|
(10,889
|
)
|
|
|
(8,015
|
)
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
(903
|
)
|
|
|
(1,183
|
)
|
|
|
(1,906
|
)
|
Asset impairments of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(3,350
|
)
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
|
(3,205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(312
|
)
|
|
|
(4,253
|
)
|
|
|
(1,439
|
)
|
|
|
(5,111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(11,104
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,222
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,783
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,328
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,126
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share, basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing net loss per
share basic and diluted
|
|
|
40,423
|
|
|
|
40,079
|
|
|
|
39,335
|
|
|
|
38,207
|
|
|
|
34,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Selected Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
4,079
|
|
|
$
|
5,589
|
|
|
$
|
6,309
|
|
|
$
|
938
|
|
|
$
|
1,952
|
|
Investments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,962
|
|
|
$
|
32,918
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
31,570
|
|
|
$
|
42,781
|
|
|
$
|
56,412
|
|
|
$
|
75,757
|
|
|
$
|
76,544
|
|
Total stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
$
|
9,325
|
|
|
$
|
19,026
|
|
|
$
|
33,846
|
|
|
$
|
50,631
|
|
|
$
|
56,208
|
|
Selected Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
(1,190
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,044
|
|
|
$
|
(2,370
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,949
|
|
|
$
|
4,249
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
$
|
(682
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,817
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,727
|
|
|
$
|
(6,674
|
)
|
|
$
|
(31,536
|
)
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
$
|
362
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
2,013
|
|
|
$
|
1,711
|
|
|
$
|
36,648
|
|
Selected Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-owned restaurants open at the end of the fiscal year
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
Item 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The following discussion and analysis of our financial
condition and results of operations for the fiscal years ended
December 28, 2009, December 29, 2008, and
December 31, 2007 should be read in conjunction with
Selected Consolidated Financial Data and our audited
consolidated financial statements and the notes to those
statements that are included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Our discussion contains forward-looking statements based upon
current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such
as our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Actual
results and the timing of events could differ materially from
those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a
result of a number of factors, including those set forth under
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
below and elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Business
Overview
System-wide
Restaurants:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Company-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Franchise
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Franchise
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Franchise
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Restaurants at beginning of period
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
107
|
b
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
110
|
a
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
New restaurants opened
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Restaurants permanently closed
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurants at end of period
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
107
|
b
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a |
|
Includes nine locations that are classified as
discontinued operations. |
|
b |
|
Includes three locations that are classified as
discontinued operations. |
There are currently 99 Company-owned and 44 franchise premium
convenience restaurants operating in 18 states, the
District of Columbia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). One
franchised restaurant in Minnesota and one location in the UAE
closed subsequent to fiscal 2009.
25
Our restaurants offer innovative savory
made-to-order
products featuring our authentic hearth-baked crackly crust
signature Cosi bread and fresh distinctive ingredients. We
maintain a pipeline of new menu offerings that are introduced
seasonally through limited time offerings to keep our products
relevant to our target customers. Our menu features high-quality
sandwiches, freshly-tossed salads, Cosi bagels, hot melts,
flatbread pizzas, Smores and other desserts, and a variety
of coffees along with other soft drink beverages, bottled
beverages including premium still and sparkling water, teas,
alcoholic beverages, and other specialty coffees. Our
restaurants offer lunch and afternoon coffee in a
counter-service format, with most offering breakfast
and/or
dinner and dessert menus as well. We operate our Company-owned
restaurants in two formats: Cosi and Cosi Downtown. Cosi
Downtown restaurants, which are located in nonresidential
central business districts, close for the day in the early
evening, while Cosi restaurants offer dinner and dessert in a
casual dining atmosphere.
We are currently eligible to offer franchises in 47 states
and the District of Columbia. We offer franchises to area
developers and individual franchise operators. Domestically, the
initial franchise fee, payable to us, for both an area developer
and an individual franchise operator, is $40,000 for the first
restaurant and $35,000 for each additional restaurant. The fees
for international agreements vary based on a variety of factors.
We believe that offering
Cosi®
franchised restaurants to area developers and individual
franchisees offers the prospects of strong financial returns. By
franchising, we believe we will be able to increase the presence
of our restaurants in various markets throughout the country and
generate additional revenue without the large upfront capital
commitments and risk associated with opening Company-owned
restaurants.
We believe that incorporating a franchising and area developer
model into our strategy will position us to maximize the market
potential for the
Cosi®
brand and concept consistent with our available capital and we
expect that Company-owned restaurants (restaurants that we own
as opposed to franchised restaurants) will always be an
important part of our new restaurant growth.
During fiscal 2009, we opened one new Company-owned restaurant
in Kohl Childrens Museum in Illinois and we purchased one
franchised restaurant in Minnesota and are now operating it as a
Company-owned location. During 2009, we permanently closed four
underperforming Company-owned restaurants where we were able to
negotiate acceptable lease termination agreements with the
landlords. In addition, during fiscal 2009, we opened six new
and permanently closed ten franchised restaurants.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (GAAP) requires the
appropriate application of certain accounting policies, many of
which require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses
during the reporting period.
We believe the application of our accounting policies, and the
estimates inherently required therein, are reasonable and
generally accepted for companies in the restaurant industry. We
believe that the following addresses the more critical
accounting policies used in the preparation of our consolidated
financial statements and require managements most
difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the
need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are
inherently uncertain.
Long Lived Assets: ASC
360-10-35
Property, Plant, & Equipment requires management
judgments regarding the future operating and disposition plans
for marginally-performing assets, and estimates of expected
realizable values for assets to be sold. The application of this
standard has affected the amount and timing of charges to
operating results that have been significant in recent years. We
evaluate possible impairment at the individual restaurant level
periodically and record an impairment loss whenever we determine
impairment factors are present. We consider a history of poor
financial operating performance to be the primary indicator of
potential impairment for individual restaurant locations. We
determine whether a restaurant location is impaired based on
expected undiscounted cash flows, generally for the remainder of
the lease term, and then determine the impairment charge based
on discounted cash flows for the same period. Restaurants are
not considered for impairment during
26
the
ramp-up
period before they enter the comparable restaurant base, unless
specific circumstances warrant otherwise.
Lease Termination Charges: ASC
820-30
Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations requires companies to
recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when
they are incurred, rather than at the end of a commitment to an
exit or disposal plan. For all exit activities, we estimate our
likely liability under contractual leases for restaurants that
have been closed. Such estimates have affected the amount and
timing of charges to operating results and are impacted by
managements judgments about the time it may take to find a
suitable subtenant or assignee, or the terms under which a
termination of the lease agreement may be negotiated with the
landlord.
Accounting for Lease Obligations: In
accordance with ASC
840-25
Leases, we recognize rent expense on a straight-line
basis over the lease term commencing on the date we take
possession. We include any rent escalations, rent abatements
during the construction period and any other rent holidays in
our straight-line rent expense calculation.
Landlord Allowances: In accordance with ASC
840-25
Leases, we record landlord allowances as deferred rent in
other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets
and amortize them on a straight-line basis over the term of the
related leases.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense: In
accordance with ASC
718-10-25
Compensation Stock Compensation we recognize
stock-based compensation expense according to the fair value
recognition provision, which generally requires, among other
things, that all employee share-based compensation be measured
using a fair value method and that all the resulting
compensation expense be recognized in the financial statements.
We measure the estimated fair value of our granted stock options
using a Black-Scholes pricing model and of our restricted stock
based on the fair market value of a share of registered stock on
the date of grant. The weighted average fair values of the stock
options granted through 2005, the last time we issued stock
options, were determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model.
We estimate forfeitures in calculating the expense relating to
stock-based compensation. Pre-vesting forfeiture rates are
estimated based on historical data. The expected volatility is
based on an average of the historical volatility of the
Companys stock, the implied volatility of market options,
peer company volatility, and other factors. The average expected
life represents the period of time that stock option grants are
expected to be outstanding and is derived from historical terms
and other factors. The risk-free interest rate is based on the
rate of U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with remaining
term equal to the expected life of stock option grants.
Income Taxes: We have recorded a full
valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets that
relate primarily to net operating loss carryforwards. Our
determination of the valuation allowance is based on an
evaluation of whether it is more likely than not that we will be
able to utilize the net operating loss carryforwards based on
the Companys operating results. A positive adjustment to
income will be recorded in future years if we determine that we
could realize these deferred tax assets.
We have adopted the provisions of ASC
740-10
Income Taxes beginning in fiscal 2007. No adjustment was
made to the beginning retained earnings balance, as the ultimate
deductibility of all tax positions is highly certain but there
is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. No
interest or penalties have been accrued relative to tax
positions due to the Company having either a tax loss or net
operating loss carry-forwards to offset any taxable income in
all subject years. As a result, no liability for uncertain tax
positions has been recorded.
Revenue
Restaurant Net Sales. Our Company-owned
restaurant sales are composed almost entirely of food and
beverage sales. We record revenue at the time of the purchase of
our products by our customers.
Franchise Fees and Royalties. Franchise fees
and royalties includes fees earned from franchise agreements
entered into with area developers and franchise operators, as
well as royalties received based on sales generated at
franchised restaurants. We recognize the franchise fee in the
period in which a franchise location opens or when fees are
forfeited as a result of a termination of an area developer
agreement. We recognize franchise royalties in the period in
which sales are made by our franchise operators.
27
Gift Card Sales. We offer our customers the
opportunity to purchase gift cards at our restaurants and
through our website. Customers can purchase these cards at
varying dollar amounts. At the time of purchase by the customer,
we record a gift card liability for the face value of the card
purchased. We recognize the revenue and reduce the gift card
liability when the gift card is redeemed. We do not reduce our
recorded liability for potential non-use of purchased gift cards.
Comparable
Restaurant Sales
In calculating comparable restaurant sales, we include a
restaurant in the comparable restaurant base after it has been
in operation for 15 full months. We remove from the comparable
restaurant base any restaurant that is temporarily shut down for
remodeling for a complete period in the period that it is shut
down. At fiscal years ended December 28, 2009,
December 29, 2008, and December 31, 2007, there were
97, 99, and 95 restaurants in our comparable restaurant base,
respectively.
Costs and
Expenses
Cost of Food and Beverage. Cost of food and
beverage is composed of food and beverage costs. Food and
beverage costs are variable and fluctuate with sales volume.
Restaurant Labor and Related Benefits. The
costs of restaurant labor and related benefits include direct
hourly and management wages, bonuses, payroll taxes, health
insurance and all other fringe benefits.
Occupancy and Other Restaurant Operating
Expenses. Occupancy and other restaurant
operating expenses include direct restaurant-level operating
expenses, including the cost of paper and packaging, supplies,
repairs and maintenance, utilities, rent and related occupancy
costs.
General and Administrative Expenses. General
and administrative expenses include all corporate and
administrative functions that support our restaurants and
provide an infrastructure to operate our business. Components of
these expenses include executive management costs; supervisory
and staff salaries; non-field stock-based compensation expense;
non-field bonuses and related taxes and employee benefits;
travel; information systems; training; support center rent and
related occupancy costs; and professional and consulting fees.
The salaries, bonuses and employee benefits costs included as
general and administrative expenses are generally more fixed in
nature and do not vary directly with the number of restaurants
we operate. Stock-based compensation expense includes the
charges related to recognizing the fair value of stock options
and restricted stock as compensation for awards to certain key
employees and non-employee directors, except the costs related
to stock-based compensation for restaurant employees which are
included in restaurant labor and related benefits.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation
and amortization principally relates to restaurant assets.
Restaurant Pre-opening Expenses. Restaurant
pre-opening expenses are expensed as incurred and include the
costs of recruiting, hiring and training the initial restaurant
work force, travel, the cost of food and labor used during the
period before opening, the cost of initial quantities of
supplies and other direct costs related to the opening or
remodeling of a restaurant. Pre-opening expenses also include
rent expense recognized on a straight-line basis from the date
we take possession through the period of construction,
renovation and fixturing prior to opening the restaurant.
28
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth our operating results as a
percentage of total revenues, except where otherwise noted, for
the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurant net sales
|
|
|
98.1
|
%
|
|
|
97.7
|
%
|
|
|
98.4
|
%
|
Franchise fees and royalties
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of food and beverage(1)
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
|
|
22.8
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
|
Restaurant labor and related benefits(1)
|
|
|
36.7
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
34.7
|
|
Occupancy and other restaurant operating expenses(1)
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
|
|
30.1
|
|
|
|
29.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90.9
|
|
|
|
87.1
|
|
|
|
87.1
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
Restaurant pre-opening expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Provision for losses on asset impairments and disposals
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
Closed store costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Lease termination expense, net
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
109.4
|
|
|
|
111.8
|
|
|
|
113.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
|
|
(13.2
|
)
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
|
|
(12.3
|
)
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
Asset impairments of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(12.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These are expressed as a pecentage of restaurant net sales
versus all other items expressed as a percentage of total
revenues. |
Fiscal
Year 2009 (52 weeks) compared to Fiscal Year 2008
(52 weeks)
Restaurant
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurant Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
$
|
116,375
|
|
|
|
98.1
|
%
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
132,501
|
|
|
|
97.7
|
%
|
29
Restaurant net sales decreased 12.2%, or $16.1 million, in
fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal 2008. This decrease was due
primarily to a decrease of 10.8%, or $13.8 million, in net
sales in our comparable restaurant base and $3.6 million in
net sales related to restaurants closed during and subsequent to
fiscal 2008 partially offset by $1.3 million in net sales
at new restaurants not yet in our comparable restaurant base as
of December 28, 2009. For comparable restaurants in fiscal
2009, our transaction count decreased by 8.9% and our average
check decreased by 1.9%, as compared to fiscal 2008.
Franchise
Fees and Royalties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise Fees and Royalties
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
$
|
2,198
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
3,078
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
Franchise fees and royalties during fiscal 2009 consist of
$2.1 million in royalties from the franchise restaurants
operated during fiscal 2009 and $0.1 million in fees
related to the six franchise restaurants that opened during
fiscal 2009. Franchise fees and royalties during fiscal 2008
consist of $2.1 million in royalties from franchise
restaurants operated during fiscal 2008, $0.5 million in
fees related to the 19 franchise restaurants that opened during
fiscal 2008 and $0.5 million in franchise fees related to
the termination of two area development agreements.
Costs and
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Food and Beverage
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Restaurant
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
$
|
26,429
|
|
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
30,235
|
|
|
|
22.8
|
%
|
Cost of Food and Beverage. During fiscal 2009
food and beverage costs as a percentage of net sales decreased
slightly as compared to fiscal 2008. During fiscal 2009 we had
lower
year-over-year
costs for certain commodities, primarily wheat and dairy
products which were partially offset by higher costs associated
with our limited time lobster promotional offering during the
fiscal 2009 third quarter as well as the introduction in the
latter half of fiscal 2009 of a new premium steak product.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurant Labor and
|
|
|
Related Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Restaurant
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
$
|
42,742
|
|
|
|
36.7
|
%
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
45,375
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
%
|
Restaurant Labor and Related Benefits. The
increase in restaurant labor and related benefits as a
percentage of restaurant net sales during fiscal 2009, as
compared to fiscal 2008, is due to the impact of the decrease in
sales in our comparable restaurant base on our fixed manager
salaries and hourly labor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy and Other Restaurant Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Restaurant
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
$
|
36,617
|
|
|
|
31.5
|
%
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
39,821
|
|
|
|
30.1
|
%
|
Occupancy and Other Restaurant Operating
Expenses. The increase in restaurant occupancy
and other restaurant operating expenses as a percentage of
restaurant net sales during fiscal 2009, as compared to fiscal
2008, is due primarily to the deleveraging of occupancy costs
against decreased sales in our comparable restaurant base
partially offset by slightly lower costs for repairs and
maintenance.
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
$
|
15,044
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
19,966
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
General and Administrative Expenses. The
reduction in general and administrative costs of
$5.0 million, or 2.0% of total revenues, during fiscal
2009, as compared to fiscal 2008, is due primarily to savings in
labor and related benefits resulting from administrative
workforce reductions, lower year over year legal costs largely
resulting from a litigation settlement recorded in fiscal 2008,
and lower third-party professional fees partially offset by
higher marketing costs and costs associated with the process of
reviewing strategic alternatives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
$
|
7,050
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
8,409
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
Depreciation and Amortization. The lower
depreciation and amortization costs in fiscal 2009, as compared
to fiscal 2008, are due primarily to the impact of impairments
recorded during and subsequent to the fourth quarter of fiscal
2008, as well as the continued depreciation and amortization of
our comparable restaurant base assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurant Pre-opening Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Restaurant Pre-Opening Expenses. Restaurant
pre-opening expenses during fiscal 2009 are related to supplies
and training costs for one new Company-owned restaurant that
opened during the third quarter of fiscal 2009. During fiscal
2008 restaurant pre-opening expenses were related primarily to
occupancy, pre-opening payroll, supplies and training costs for
one new restaurant opened during fiscal 2008. During fiscal
2008, 49.5% of restaurant pre-opening expenses were for
occupancy costs incurred prior to the opening of the restaurant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Losses on Asset Impairments and Disposals
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
$
|
1,530
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
7,099
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
Provision for Losses on Asset Impairments and
Disposals. During fiscal 2009, asset impairment
charges relate to seven underperforming locations, of which
three were opened during fiscal 2006 and two are located in the
Detroit, Michigan market which has been significantly impacted
by the economic downturn and where it appears unlikely that the
remaining asset values can be recovered over the remaining life
of the leases. During 2008, the asset impairment charges of
$7.1 million related to 16 underperforming locations, most
of which were built in 2005 and the first half of 2006. Nine are
located in the Midwest region, five in the Mid-Atlantic region
and two in the Northeast region, including four locations closed
during the first quarter of fiscal 2009. In addition, during
fiscal 2008, we recorded asset impairment charges of
approximately $0.1 million related to Seattle locations
that are reported in discontinued operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closed Store Costs
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
31
Closed Store Costs. The closed store costs
during fiscal 2009 relate to three underperforming locations
where we negotiated early exit agreements with the landlords and
closed those locations during the first quarter of fiscal 2009,
and one underperforming location that closed at the expiration
of the operating lease. Closed store costs during fiscal 2008
relate to two underperforming locations that closed at the
expiration of their operating leases during the first quarter of
fiscal 2008, and to two additional underperforming locations
that closed, one each during the second and third quarters of
fiscal 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease Termination Expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
$
|
322
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
551
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Lease Termination Expense, net. Lease
termination expense during fiscal 2009 relates primarily to an
underperforming location in the Midwest where we reached an
early exit agreement with the landlord and to charges associated
with our exercise of a provision allowing for the contraction of
our support center office. Lease termination expense during
fiscal 2008 primarily related to a location where we made the
decision to not build a restaurant subsequent to entering into a
lease and reached an agreement with the landlord to exit the
lease, and to three underperforming locations in the Midwest
region where we reached exit agreements with the landlords. One
of these underperforming locations was closed during the third
quarter of fiscal 2008 and the other two were closed during the
first quarter of fiscal 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on Sale of Assets
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on Sale of Assets. During fiscal 2009 we
recorded a gain related to the sale of four liquor licenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of
|
|
|
|
As a % of
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income and Expense. The decrease in
interest income in fiscal 2009, as compared to fiscal 2008, is
due to lower average rates of interest earned on deposit
accounts. During both fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, interest
expense was insignificant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income. During fiscal 2009, other income
was not significant. During fiscal 2008, we recorded other
income related to a tax refund.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
$
|
(11,104
|
)
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)%
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
(15,910
|
)
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)%
|
Loss from Continuing Operations. The decrease
in our loss from continuing operations in fiscal 2009, as
compared to fiscal 2008, is due primarily to lower non-cash
charges for asset impairments and a decrease in general
32
and administrative expenses, offset by a decrease in our
restaurant operating margins resulting from lower restaurant net
sales and decreased franchise income related to fees.
Discontinued Operations. During the first
quarter of fiscal 2008, we sold the assets of three
underperforming Company-owned locations that operated in the
Seattle market to a local restaurant development company. Under
the terms of the agreement, we transferred rights to the assets
and leasehold improvements for minimal cash consideration and
the new owner assumed the tenant obligations under the real
estate operating leases and operates those locations under a
different brand. We ceased operating these restaurants as of the
end of the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
Fiscal
Year 2008 (52 weeks) compared to Fiscal Year 2007
(52 weeks)
Restaurant
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurant Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
132,501
|
|
|
|
97.7
|
%
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
$
|
132,414
|
|
|
|
98.4
|
%
|
Restaurant net sales increased 0.1%, or $0.1 million, in
fiscal 2008 as compared to fiscal 2007. This increase was due
primarily to $3.0 million in net sales at new restaurants
not yet in the comparable restaurant base as of
December 29, 2008, and $0.9 million in net sales
related to restaurants temporarily closed for remodeling during
fiscal 2007, almost fully offset by a decline of
$2.7 million in net sales related to restaurants closed
during and subsequent to fiscal 2007, and a decrease of 0.9%, or
approximately $1.1 million, in net sales in our comparable
restaurant base. For comparable restaurants in fiscal 2008, our
average check increased 1.7% and our transaction count decreased
by 2.6%, as compared to fiscal 2007.
Franchise
Fees and Royalties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise Fees and Royalties
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
3,078
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
$
|
2,142
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
Franchise fees and royalties during fiscal 2008 consist of
$2.1 million in royalties from franchise restaurants
operated during fiscal 2008 and approximately $0.5 million
in fees related to 19 franchise restaurants that opened during
fiscal 2008, and approximately $0.5 million in franchise
fees related to the termination of two area developer
agreements. Franchise fees and royalties during fiscal 2007
consist of $1.3 million in royalties from franchise
restaurants operated during fiscal 2007 and $0.8 million in
fees related to the 22 franchise restaurants that opened during
fiscal 2007.
Costs and
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Food and Beverage
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Restaurant
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
30,235
|
|
|
|
22.8
|
%
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
$
|
30,972
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
Cost of Food and Beverage. The decrease in
food and beverage costs as a percentage of net sales during
fiscal 2008, as compared to fiscal 2007, is due primarily to
menu price increases taken during fiscal 2008 which averaged
2.1% for the year and lower costs associated with promotional
menu offerings, partially offset by
year-over-year
price increases on commodities such as wheat and dairy and
dairy-related products and higher fuel costs.
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurant Labor and Related Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Restaurant
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
45,375
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
%
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
$
|
45,995
|
|
|
|
34.7
|
%
|
Restaurant Labor and Related Benefits. The
decrease in restaurant labor and related benefits as a
percentage of restaurant net sales during fiscal 2008, as
compared to fiscal 2007, is due primarily to our continued
efforts to drive more effective labor management during both
peak and non-peak hours of operation and lower costs for
workers compensation insurance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy and Other Restaurant Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Restaurant
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
39,821
|
|
|
|
30.1
|
%
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
$
|
38,369
|
|
|
|
29.0
|
%
|
Occupancy and Other Restaurant Operating
Expenses. The increase in restaurant occupancy
and other restaurant operating expenses as a percentage of
restaurant net sales during fiscal 2008, as compared to fiscal
2007, is due primarily to higher utility costs, the deleveraging
of occupancy costs against relatively flat sales in our
comparable restaurant base and slightly higher costs for repairs
and maintenance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
19,966
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
$
|
22,973
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
General and administrative Expenses. The
reduction in general and administrative expenses of
$3.0 million during fiscal 2008, as compared to fiscal
2007, is due to labor savings from administrative workforce
reductions, lower stock-based compensation costs, lower
recruiting costs resulting from our search to select and appoint
a permanent Chief Executive Officer during 2007 and lower
corporate travel costs, offset by severance costs related to the
workforce reductions. In addition, during fiscal 2008, we
recorded approximately $2.0 million in charges related to
legal settlements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
8,409
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
$
|
8,823
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
Depreciation and Amortization. The lower
depreciation and amortization costs in fiscal 2008, as compared
to fiscal 2007, are due primarily to the impact of impairments
recorded during and subsequent to the fourth quarter of fiscal
2007, as well as the continued depreciation and amortization of
our comparable restaurant base, partially offset by higher
depreciation and amortization costs related to one new
restaurant opened during fiscal 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurant Pre-opening Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
$
|
710
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Restaurant Pre-Opening Expenses. Restaurant
pre-opening expenses of $0.1 million during fiscal 2008,
relate primarily to occupancy, pre-opening payroll, supplies and
training costs for one new restaurant opened during fiscal 2008.
During fiscal 2008, 49.5% of restaurant pre-opening expenses
were for occupancy costs incurred prior to the opening of the
restaurant. Restaurant pre-opening expenses of $0.7 million
in fiscal 2007, relate primarily to
34
occupancy, pre-opening payroll, supplies and training costs for
six new restaurants opened during fiscal 2007. During fiscal
2007, 54.8% of restaurant pre-opening expenses were for
occupancy costs incurred prior to the opening of the restaurants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Losses on Asset Impairments and Disposals
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
7,099
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
$
|
3,845
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
Provision for Losses on Asset Impairments and
Disposals. During fiscal 2008, we recorded asset
impairment charges of $7.1 million related to 16
underperforming locations, most of which were built in 2005 and
the first half of 2006. Nine are located in the Midwest region,
five in the Mid-Atlantic region and two in the Northeast region,
including four locations closed during the first quarter of
fiscal 2009. During fiscal 2008, we recorded asset impairment
charges of approximately $0.1 million related to Seattle
locations that are reported in discontinued operations. The
asset impairment charges of $3.8 million recorded in fiscal
2007 are attributable to seven underperforming locations
determined to be impaired, including one location that was
closed during the third quarter of fiscal 2008. In addition,
during fiscal 2007, we recorded impairment charges of
$3.4 million related to six Macys Inc.
(Macys) and three Seattle locations, which are
reported in discontinued operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closed Store Costs
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Closed Store Costs. Closed store costs during
fiscal 2008 relate to two underperforming locations that closed
at the expiration of their operating leases during the first
quarter of fiscal 2008 and to two additional underperforming
locations that closed, one each during the second and third
quarters of fiscal 2008. Closed store costs during fiscal 2007
relate to one restaurant in New York City that closed upon the
lease expiration and was relocated within the immediate area
during the second quarter of fiscal 2007, one underperforming
location where the lease expired and we exited the location, and
one underperforming location where the lease was scheduled to
expire in fiscal 2008 and we negotiated an early exit agreement
with the landlord.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease Termination Expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
551
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
$
|
347
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Lease Termination Expense, net. Lease
termination expense during fiscal 2008 is primarily related to a
location where we made the decision to not build a restaurant
subsequent to entering into a lease and reached an agreement
with the landlord to exit the lease, and to three
underperforming locations in the Midwest region where we reached
early exit agreements with the landlords. One of these
underperforming locations was closed during the third quarter of
fiscal 2008 and the other two were closed during the first
quarter of fiscal 2009. The lease termination expense during
fiscal 2007 relates to a location where, due to the enforcement
of restrictions in a zoning overlay district, Cosi was denied
the necessary permits to build a restaurant and we exercised the
exit provision under the lease, and to an underperforming
restaurant in Chicago where we exercised an early exit provision
of the lease and exited the location in the first quarter of
fiscal 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on Sale of Assets
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
Gain on Sale of Assets. The gain recognized
during fiscal 2007 is related to the sale of a liquor license.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
$
|
524
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income and Expense. The decrease in
interest income in fiscal 2008, as compared to fiscal 2007, is
due primarily to lower average rates of interest earned on
deposit accounts as well as a decline in short-term investments
during fiscal 2008. During both fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007,
interest expense was insignificant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
$
|
705
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Other income. During fiscal 2008, we recorded
other income related to a tax refund. Other income during fiscal
2007 is due primarily to a cash settlement on an insurance claim
related to a location that we operated in The World Trade Center
on September 11, 2001.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
$
|
(15,910
|
)
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)%
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
$
|
(16,530
|
)
|
|
|
(12.3
|
)%
|
Loss from Continuing Operations. The decrease
in our loss from continuing operations in fiscal 2008, as
compared to fiscal 2007, is due primarily to a decrease in
general and administrative expenses and higher income from
franchise fees and royalties, offset by higher non-cash charges
for asset impairments and higher lease termination costs.
Discontinued Operations. During the third
quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company reached an agreement with
Macys relating to six Cosi restaurants operated within
Macys stores. Under the terms of the agreement, we ceased
operations and closed those locations on August 19, 2007.
In addition, we sold the assets of three underperforming
Company-owned locations that operated in the state of Washington
to a local restaurant development company. Under the terms of
the agreement, we transferred rights to the assets and leasehold
improvements for minimal cash consideration and the new owner
assumed the tenant obligations under the real estate operating
leases and is operating those locations under a different brand.
We ceased operating these restaurants as of the end of the first
quarter of fiscal 2008.
In accordance with ASC
360-10-45,
Property, Plant, Equipment, we have reported the results
of operations of this group in discontinued operations in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements for all periods
presented. During fiscals 2008 and 2007, the operating loss from
discontinued operations was $0.2 million and
$0.9 million, respectively.
In addition, we recorded charges of $0.1 million and
$3.4 million during fiscals 2008 and 2007, respectively,
related to the impairment of the assets at the Seattle and
Macys locations, which are also reported in discontinued
operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash and cash equivalents were approximately $4.1 million
on December 28, 2009, compared with $5.6 million on
December 29, 2008. We had negative working capital of
($5.6) million on December 28, 2009, compared with
negative working capital of ($2.9) million as of
December 29, 2008. The decrease in working capital was
primarily a function of funding the operating loss for the year.
Our principal requirements for cash in 2010 will be for working
capital needs and routine maintenance of our existing
restaurants.
36
Net cash used in operating activities during the twelve-month
period ended December 28, 2009, was approximately
$1.2 million compared to $2.0 million of net cash
provided by operating activities in the twelve-month period
ended December 29, 2008. The increase in cash used in
operating activities during fiscal 2009 was primarily the result
of funding our operating loss and the payment of approximately
$1.0 million for certain lease termination and legal
settlement obligations.
Total cash used in investing activities was $0.7 million
during fiscal 2009, compared to $2.8 million during fiscal
2008. The
year-over-year
decrease is due primarily to lower capital expenditures in
fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal 2008. The capital expenditures
during fiscal 2009 were primarily for the capital maintenance of
our existing Company-owned restaurants. During fiscal 2008
capital expenditures included the construction of one new
Company-owned restaurant that opened during the second quarter
of fiscal 2008.
Cash provided by financing activities during fiscal 2009 of
$0.4 million is from the settlement of a claim, in which we
recovered short-swing profits realized by a stockholder of the
Company under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934. During fiscal 2008, cash provided by financing
activities of approximately $0.05 million was from proceeds
associated with the exercise of stock options.
We currently do not expect to open any additional Company-owned
restaurants or incur any significant remodeling capital costs
during fiscal 2010. However, we do expect to incur capital
maintenance costs on existing Company-owned restaurants. As we
currently have no credit facility or available line of credit,
we expect to fund any required capital maintenance costs on
existing Company-owned locations from cash and cash equivalents
on hand, expected cash flows generated by existing Company-owned
restaurants, expected franchise fees and royalties and from the
proceeds of a shareholders rights offering which was
successfully completed subsequent to the end of fiscal 2009. The
rights offering was completed during the first quarter of fiscal
2010 (see Note 9) and yielded net proceeds of
$4.9 million.
We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents, the
proceeds from the completed rights offering and the expected
cash flows from Company-owned restaurant operations and expected
franchise fees and royalties will be sufficient to fund our cash
requirements for working capital needs and maintenance of
existing restaurant locations for the next twelve months. Our
conclusion is based on our expected performance for fiscal 2010
and includes a sensitivity analysis that projects varying levels
of decline in consumer demand. The range of levels selected was
based on our reasonable expectation of demand given the
seasonality of our historical performance and the potential
impact the current economic environment may have on consumer
spending. In analyzing our capital cash outlays during fiscal
2009, 59.1% of our cash outlay was spent on maintenance costs
associated with existing Company-owned locations. We currently
do not expect significant levels of cash outlays for capital
expenditures during fiscal 2010.
If our Company-owned restaurants do not generate the cash flow
levels that we expect, if new franchised restaurants do not open
according to our expectations, if we do not generate the
franchise fees and royalties that we currently expect, if we
incur significant unanticipated cash requirements beyond our
normal liquidity needs, or if we experience other unforeseen
circumstances then, in order to fund our cash requirements, we
may have to effect further labor reductions in general and
administrative support functions, seek to sell certain
Company-owned locations to franchisees
and/or other
third parties, seek other sources of financing or take other
actions necessitated by the impact of such unanticipated
circumstances.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain such
financing, sell Company-owned locations to franchisees or other
third parties or that we will be able to do so in a timely
manner and on acceptable terms to meet our requirements. If the
prevailing instability in the credit and financial markets
continues, it may be more difficult for the Company to obtain
additional financing and for franchisees to obtain financing
necessary to open restaurants or to acquire Company-owned
locations. An inability to access additional sources of
liquidity to fund our cash needs could materially adversely
affect our financial condition and results of operations.
37
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, that have or
are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our
financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or
expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures
or capital resources that are material to investors.
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data
Quarterly results are determined in accordance with the
accounting policies used for annual data and include certain
items based upon estimates for the entire year. All quarters in
fiscal 2009 and 2008 include results for 13 weeks. The
unaudited selected quarterly results for fiscal 2009 and 2008
are shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
28,666
|
|
|
$
|
31,636
|
|
|
$
|
30,033
|
|
|
$
|
28,238
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
$
|
31,995
|
|
|
$
|
32,610
|
|
|
$
|
32,454
|
|
|
$
|
32,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(3,326
|
)
|
|
$
|
(969
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,362
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,447
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share:
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
33,191
|
|
|
$
|
36,723
|
|
|
$
|
34,930
|
|
|
$
|
30,735
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
$
|
35,979
|
|
|
$
|
38,447
|
|
|
$
|
38,078
|
|
|
$
|
39,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(3,028
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,729
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,095
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,370
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share:
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
included in Part II, Item 7 of this report for further
details or new accounting pronouncements not yet adopted.
CAUTIONARY
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
We caution that any forward-looking statements (as such term is
defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995) contained or incorporated by reference in this
Form 10-K
and Annual Report or made by our management involve risks and
uncertainties and are subject to change based on various
important factors, many of which may be beyond our control.
Accordingly, our future performance and financial results may
differ materially from those expressed or implied in any such
forward-looking statements. For these statements, we claim the
protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements
contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. Any such forward-looking statements are subject to risks
and uncertainties, including, without limitation, those
described in Item 1A of this Report. If any of these risks
or uncertainties actually occurs, our business, financial
condition or operating results could be materially and adversely
affected, and the trading price of our common stock could
decline. We do not undertake to publicly update or revise our
forward-looking statements even if our future changes make it
clear that any projected results expressed or implied therein
will not be realized.
Listed below are just some of the factors that would impact our
forward looking statements:
|
|
|
|
|
the cost of our principal food products and supply and delivery
shortages or interruptions;
|
|
|
|
labor shortages or increased labor costs;
|
|
|
|
changes in demographic trends and consumer tastes and
preferences, including changes resulting from concerns over
nutritional or safety aspects of beef, poultry, produce or other
foods or the effects of food-borne illnesses, such as E.coli,
mad cow disease and avian influenza or bird
flu;
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
competition in our markets, both in our existing business and
locating suitable restaurant sites;
|
|
|
|
our operation and execution in new and existing markets;
|
|
|
|
expansion into new markets, including foreign countries;
|
|
|
|
our ability to attract and retain qualified franchisees and our
frachisees ability to open restaurants on a timely basis;
|
|
|
|
our ability to locate suitable restaurant sites in new and
existing markets and negotiate acceptable lease terms;
|
|
|
|
the rate of our internal growth, and our ability to generate
increased revenue from our new and existing restaurants;
|
|
|
|
our ability to generate positive cash flow from existing and new
restaurants;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in our quarterly results due to seasonality;
|
|
|
|
increased government regulation and our ability to secure
required governmental approvals and permits;
|
|
|
|
our ability to create customer awareness of our restaurants in
new markets;
|
|
|
|
the reliability of our customer and market studies;
|
|
|
|
cost effective and timely planning, design and build-out of new
restaurants;
|
|
|
|
our ability to recruit, train and retain qualified corporate and
restaurant personnel and management;
|
|
|
|
market saturation due to new restaurant openings;
|
|
|
|
inadequate protection of our intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain additional capital and financing;
|
|
|
|
adverse weather conditions, which impact customer traffic at our
restaurants; and
|
|
|
|
adverse economic conditions.
|
The words believe, may,
will, should, anticipate,
estimate, expect, intend,
objective, seek, plan,
strive, project or similar words, or the
negatives of these words, identify forward-looking statements.
We qualify any forward-looking statements entirely by these
cautionary factors.
|
|
Item 7A:
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
Interest
Rate Risk
Our market risk exposures are related to our cash and cash
equivalents and interest that we may pay on debt. We have no
derivative financial commodity instruments. We invest our excess
cash in investment grade, highly liquid, short-term investments.
These investments are not held for trading or other speculative
purposes. Changes in interest rates affect the investment income
we earn on our investments and, therefore, impact our cash flows
and results of operations. During fiscal 2009 we held no
short-term investments and, as a result, a hypothetical one
percentage point interest change from those in effect during
fiscal 2009 would not have resulted in a fluctuation of interest
income. In fiscals 2009 and 2008, interest income was
$0.03 million and $0.1 million, respectively. During
fiscals 2009 and 2008 we did not have any significant debt.
Foreign
Currency Risk
As of fiscal 2009, all of our transactions are conducted, and
our accounts denominated, in U.S. dollars. Accordingly, we
are not exposed to foreign currency risk.
39
Inflation
The primary inflationary factors affecting our business are food
and labor costs. Some of our food costs are subject to
fluctuations in commodity prices. Volatility in the commodity
markets such as the wheat and dairy markets can have an adverse
impact on our results from operations. Some of our hourly
personnel at our restaurants are paid at rates based on the
applicable minimum wage, and increases in the minimum wage will
directly affect our labor costs. Many of our leases require us
to pay taxes, maintenance, repairs, insurance, and utilities,
all of which are generally subject to inflationary increases.
Historically, inflation has not had a material impact on our
results of operation.
|
|
Item 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
The consolidated financial statements required to be filed
hereunder are set forth on pages 58 through 82 of this Report.
|
|
Item 9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures as such term is defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), as of the end of the
fiscal year covered by this report. Based on this evaluation,
our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer
concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this
report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective
(i) to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and
(ii) to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
us in the reports that we submit under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We are responsible for the preparation and integrity of the
consolidated financial statements appearing in this our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States and include amounts based on managements
estimates and judgments. All other financial information in this
report has been presented on a basis consistent with the
information included in the financial statements.
We are also responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). We
maintain a system of internal controls that is designed to
provide reasonable assurance as to the fair and reliable
preparation and presentation of the consolidated financial
statements, as well as to safeguard assets from unauthorized use
or disposition.
Our control environment is the foundation for our system of
internal control over financial reporting and is embodied in our
Corporate Governance Policy. It sets the tone of our
organization and includes factors such as integrity and ethical
values. Our internal control over financial reporting is
supported by formal policies and procedures which are reviewed,
modified and improved as changes occur in business conditions
and operations.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, on behalf of the
stockholders, oversees managements financial reporting
responsibilities. The Audit Committee, which is composed solely
of independent outside directors, meets periodically with the
independent auditors, management and our Director of Internal
Audit to review matters relating to financial reporting,
internal accounting controls and auditing. The independent
registered
40
public accountants, the Director of Internal Audit and our Chief
Compliance Officer advise the Audit Committee of any significant
matters resulting from their audits or reviews and have free
access to the Audit Committee without management being present.
The Chief Compliance Officer, the independent registered public
accountants and the Director of Internal Audit have free and
full access to senior management and the Audit Committee at any
time.
We assessed the effectiveness of the Companys system of
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 28, 2009. In making this assessment, we used the
criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework. We have concluded that, as of
December 28, 2009, the Companys system of internal
control over financial reporting was effective.
This report does not include an attestation report of the
Companys registered public accounting firm regarding
internal control over financial reporting. Managements
report was not subject to attestation by the Companys
registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of
the SEC that permit the Company to provide only
managements report in this annual report.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting (as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended
December 28, 2009, to which this report relates, that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
None.
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
The information required by this Item will be set forth in our
definitive proxy statement for our Annual Meeting of
Stockholders expected to be held on May 18, 2010 (the
Proxy Statement) and is incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
Item 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
The information required by this Item will be set forth in the
Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
The information required by this Item will be set forth in the
Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
The information required by this Item will be set forth in the
Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
The information required by this Item will be set forth in the
Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
41
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this
Report:
1. The Financial Statements required to be filed hereunder
are listed in the Index to Financial Statements on page 56
of this Report
(b) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Merger Agreement by and among Xando, Incorporated, Xando Merger
Corp. and Cosi Sandwich Bar, Inc. dated as of October 4, 1999
(Filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1, file #333-86390).
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cosi, Inc.
(Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 30, 2002).
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of Cosi, Inc. (Filed as Exhibit 3.1
to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended October 1, 2007).
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Form of Certificate of Common Stock (Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, file
#333-86390).
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Rights Agreement between Cosi, Inc. and American Stock Transfer
and Trust Company as Rights Agent dated November 21, 2002 (Filed
as Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 30, 2002).
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Registration Agreement, dated as of March
30, 1999 (Filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-1, file #333-86390).
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Supplemental Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August
5, 2003 by and among the Company and the parties thereto (Filed
as Exhibit 4.4.2 to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
file #333-107689).
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement dated as of November 21,
2002, between Cosi, Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust
Company, as rights agent (Filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2003).
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Amendment dated as of January 6, 2010, to Rights Agreement dated
as of November 21, 2002, between Cosi, Inc. and American Stock
Transfer Company, as rights agent (Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 6, 2010).
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Cosi, Inc. 2005 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (Filed as
Exhibit C to the Companys Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A
filed on March 31, 2005, file #000-50052).
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Cosi Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, file
#333-86390).
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Cosi Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan (Filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1, file #333-86390).
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Cosi Sandwich Bar, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan (Filed as
Exhibit 10.4 to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1, file #333-86390).
|
|
10
|
.5.1
|
|
Terms of Employment between Cosi, Inc. and William E. Koziel,
effective as of August 17, 2005 as described in the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (Filed on August 23,
2005).
|
|
10
|
.5.2
|
|
Employment agreement, dated as of September 15, 2007 by and
between the Company and James F. Hyatt (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to
the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September
18, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.5.3
|
|
General Separation and Release Agreement by and between the
Company and Christopher Ames, dated August 26, 2008 (Filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 29, 2008).
|
|
10
|
.5.4
|
|
General Separation and Release Agreement by and between the
Company and Christopher Carroll, dated August 26, 2008 (Filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 29, 2008).
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
|
10
|
.5.5
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2008
by and between the Directors and Officers of the Company (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form
8-K, dated December 18, 2008).
|
|
10
|
.5.6
|
|
Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated as of December 18,
2008 by and between William Koziel and the Company (filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K,
dated December 18, 2008).
|
|
10
|
.5.7
|
|
Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated as of December 18,
2008 by and between Vicki Baue and the Company (filed as Exhibit
10.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
December 18, 2008).
|
|
10
|
.5.8
|
|
Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated as of December 18,
2008 by and between Paul Bower and the Company (filed as Exhibit
10.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
December 18, 2008).
|
|
10
|
.5.9
|
|
Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated as of December 18,
2008 by and between Becky Iliff and the Company (filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K,
dated December 18, 2008).
|
|
10
|
.5.10
|
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of December
18, 2008 by and between the Company and James Hyatt (filed as
Exhibit 10.5 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K,
dated December 18, 2008).
|
|
10
|
.5.11
|
|
Form of Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2009, for
Jim Hyatt, Bill Koziel, Vicki Baue, Paul Bower, Becky
Iliff, Maggie Martensen, Bob Merritt, Creed Ford, Mark Demilio,
Karl Okamoto and Mike ODonnell (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to
the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-3
(Commission File No. 333-162233)).
|
|
10
|
.6.1
|
|
Foodservice Distribution Agreement between Cosi, Inc. and
Distribution Market Advantage, Inc. dated as of November 1,
2005.(1)
|
|
10
|
.7.1
|
|
Cosi, Inc. Form of Franchise Agreement (Filed as Exhibit 10.5 to
the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended July 4, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.7.2
|
|
Cosi, Inc. Form of Area Developer Franchise Agreement (Filed as
Exhibit 10.6 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended July 4, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Form of Senior Secured Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement
(Filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Companys Registration on
Form S-1, file #333-86390).
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of April 27, 2004 (Filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form
8-K, dated April 28, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Filed as Exhibit 10.1
to the Companys Current Report of Form 8-K, dated June 6,
2005).
|
|
16
|
|
|
Letter from Ernst & Young LLP to the Securities and
Exchange Commission, dated as of August 13, 2004, acknowledging
its agreement with the statements made in Current Report on Form
8-K (Filed as Exhibit 16 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K, dated August 13, 2004).
|
|
21
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Cosi, Inc. (Filed as Exhibit 21.1 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1,
file #333-86390).
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Filed herewith Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP, Registered Public
Accounting Firm.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Filed herewith Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Filed herewith Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Filed herewith Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Portions of Exhibit 10.6.1 have been omitted and filed
separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant
to a request for confidential treatment. |
43
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
50-68
|
|
44
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Cosi, Inc.
Deerfield, Illinois
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Cosi, Inc. as of December 28, 2009 and December 29,
2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for the years ended
December 28, 2009, December 29, 2008 and
December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audits included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the financial statements and schedules. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Cosi, Inc. at December 28, 2009 and
December 29, 2008, and the results of its operations and
its cash flows for the years ended December 28, 2009,
December 29, 2008 and December 31, 2007, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 29, 2010
45
Cosi,
Inc.
As of
December 28, 2009 and December 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
4,079
|
|
|
$
|
5,589
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
916
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
2,136
|
|
|
|
3,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
7,742
|
|
|
|
11,153
|
|
Furniture and fixtures, equipment and leasehold improvements, net
|
|
|
22,100
|
|
|
|
29,779
|
|
Intangibles, security deposits and other assets
|
|
|
1,728
|
|
|
|
1,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
31,570
|
|
|
$
|
42,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
3,079
|
|
|
$
|
3,378
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
9,628
|
|
|
|
9,835
|
|
Deferred franchise revenue
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Current portion of other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
13,339
|
|
|
|
14,034
|
|
Deferred franchise revenue
|
|
|
2,563
|
|
|
|
2,545
|
|
Other long-term liabilities, net of current portion
|
|
|
6,343
|
|
|
|
7,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
22,245
|
|
|
|
23,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $.01 par value;
100,000,000 shares authorized, 40,862,474 and
40,663,189 shares issued, respectively
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
277,994
|
|
|
|
276,593
|
|
Treasury stock, 239,543 shares at cost
|
|
|
(1,198
|
)
|
|
|
(1,198
|
)
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(267,880
|
)
|
|
|
(256,776
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
9,325
|
|
|
|
19,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
31,570
|
|
|
$
|
42,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an intergral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
46
Cosi,
Inc.
For the
Fiscal Years Ended December 28, 2009, December 29,
2008 and December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurant net sales
|
|
$
|
116,375
|
|
|
$
|
132,501
|
|
|
$
|
132,414
|
|
Franchise fees and royalties
|
|
|
2,198
|
|
|
|
3,078
|
|
|
|
2,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
118,573
|
|
|
|
135,579
|
|
|
|
134,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of food and beverage
|
|
|
26,429
|
|
|
|
30,235
|
|
|
|
30,972
|
|
Restaurant labor and related benefits
|
|
|
42,742
|
|
|
|
45,375
|
|
|
|
45,995
|
|
Occupancy and other restaurant operating expenses
|
|
|
36,617
|
|
|
|
39,821
|
|
|
|
38,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,788
|
|
|
|
115,431
|
|
|
|
115,336
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
15,044
|
|
|
|
19,966
|
|
|
|
22,973
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,050
|
|
|
|
8,409
|
|
|
|
8,823
|
|
Restaurant pre-opening expenses
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
Provision for losses on asset impairments and disposals
|
|
|
1,530
|
|
|
|
7,099
|
|
|
|
3,845
|
|
Closed store costs
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Lease termination expense (benefit), net
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
129,693
|
|
|
|
151,625
|
|
|
|
152,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(11,120
|
)
|
|
|
(16,046
|
)
|
|
|
(17,717
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(11,104
|
)
|
|
|
(15,910
|
)
|
|
|
(16,530
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
(903
|
)
|
Asset impairments of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(3,350
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(312
|
)
|
|
|
(4,253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(11,104
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,222
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,783
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share, basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
40,423,424
|
|
|
|
40,078,962
|
|
|
|
39,334,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an intergral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
47
Cosi,
Inc.
For the
Fiscal Years Ended December 28, 2009, December 29,
2008 and December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid In
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2007
|
|
|
39,910,114
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
271,200
|
|
|
|
239,543
|
|
|
|
(1,198
|
)
|
|
|
(219,771
|
)
|
|
|
50,631
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
147,932
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,969
|
|
Exercise of warrants
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
989,240
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,783
|
)
|
|
|
(20,783
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
41,047,985
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
275,187
|
|
|
|
239,543
|
|
|
|
(1,198
|
)
|
|
|
(240,554
|
)
|
|
|
33,846
|
|
Net forfeiture of restricted stock
|
|
|
(420,330
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,349
|
|
Exercise of warrants
|
|
|
11,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
23,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,222
|
)
|
|
|
(16,222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 29, 2008
|
|
|
40,663,164
|
|
|
$
|
407
|
|
|
$
|
276,593
|
|
|
|
239,543
|
|
|
$
|
(1,198
|
)
|
|
$
|
(256,776
|
)
|
|
$
|
19,026
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
199,310
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
Stock claim settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,104
|
)
|
|
|
(11,104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 28, 2009
|
|
|
40,862,474
|
|
|
$
|
409
|
|
|
$
|
277,994
|
|
|
|
239,543
|
|
|
$
|
(1,198
|
)
|
|
$
|
(267,880
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(11,104
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,222
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,783
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided
by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,050
|
|
|
|
8,414
|
|
|
|
9,233
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Non-cash portion of asset impairments and disposals
|
|
|
1,530
|
|
|
|
7,187
|
|
|
|
7,195
|
|
Non-cash portion of store closing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
Provision for bad debts
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
|
|
1,349
|
|
|
|
1,968
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
(281
|
)
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(557
|
)
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
|
Deferred franchise revenue
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(819
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Lease termination reserve
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(746
|
)
|
|
|
(521
|
)
|
|
|
(693
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(1,190
|
)
|
|
|
2,044
|
|
|
|
(2,369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(901
|
)
|
|
|
(2,881
|
)
|
|
|
(14,363
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,777
|
)
|
Redemptions of investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,738
|
|
Return of security deposits, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(682
|
)
|
|
|
(2,817
|
)
|
|
|
5,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceed from stock claim settlement
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
Principal payments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(1,510
|
)
|
|
|
(720
|
)
|
|
|
5,371
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
5,589
|
|
|
|
6,309
|
|
|
|
938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$
|
4,079
|
|
|
$
|
5,589
|
|
|
$
|
6,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate franchise and income taxes
|
|
$
|
202
|
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
49
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Organization
Cosi, Inc., a Delaware corporation, owns, operates, and
franchises premium convenience dining restaurants which sell
high-quality sandwiches, salads and coffees along with a variety
of other soft drink beverages, teas, baked goods and alcoholic
beverages. As of December 28, 2009 there were 99
Company-owned and 46 franchise restaurants operating in
18 states, the District of Columbia, and the United Arab
Emirates (UAE).
Fiscal
Year
Our fiscal year ends on the Monday closest to December 31.
Fiscal years ended December 28, 2009, December 29,
2008, and December 31, 2007 are referred to as fiscal 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively. Fiscal years 2009, 2008, and 2007
each included 52 weeks.
Basis
of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All
inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
The statements are presented in accordance with the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC or the
Codification)
105-10
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (formerly
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification
and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles a replacement of FASB Statement
162), which provides for the Codification to become the
single official source of authoritative, nongovernmental
U.S. GAAP.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
We consider all short-term investments with a maturity of three
months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Concentration
of Credit Risks
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash
deposits. We place our cash deposits in Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insured financial
institutions, US government and government sponsored agency
securities, commercial paper and money market funds. Cash
deposits may exceed FDIC insured levels from time to time.
Our accounts receivable consist principally of trade or
house accounts representing corporate customers and
amounts due from franchisees. We have established credit
procedures and analyses to control the granting of credit to
customers.
Accounts
Receivable
Trade accounts receivable are stated at net realizable value.
The Company maintains a reserve for potential uncollectible
accounts based on historical trends and known current factors
impacting the Companys customers.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined using a
weighted average valuation method that approximates the
first-in,
first-out method, or market, and consist principally of food,
beverage, liquor, packaging and related food supplies.
50
COSI,
INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Furniture
and Fixtures, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements
Furniture and fixtures, equipment and leasehold improvements are
stated at cost. Depreciation of furniture and fixtures and
equipment is computed using the straight-line method over
estimated useful lives that range from two to ten years.
Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line
method over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the
term of the related leases.
Upon retirement or sale, the cost of assets disposed of and
their related accumulated depreciation are removed from the
accounts. Any resulting gain or loss is credited or charged to
operations. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense when
incurred, while betterments are capitalized.
Long-Lived
Assets
Impairment losses are recorded on long-lived assets on a
restaurant-by-restaurant
basis whenever impairment factors are determined to be present.
We consider a consistent history of poor financial operating
performance to be the primary indicator of potential impairment
for individual restaurant locations. We determine whether a
restaurant location is impaired based on expected undiscounted
cash flows, generally for the remainder of the original lease
term, and then determine the impairment charge based on
discounted cash flows for the same period.
During fiscal 2008, we sold the assets of three underperforming
Company-owned locations that operated in the Seattle market to a
local restaurant development company. Under the terms of the
agreement, we transferred rights to the assets and leasehold
improvements for minimal cash consideration and the new owner
assumed the tenant obligations under the real estate operating
leases and is operating those locations under a different brand.
We ceased operating these restaurants as of the end of the first
quarter of fiscal 2008.
In accordance with the provisions of the impairment or disposal
subsections of ASC 360 10, Property,
Plant & Equipment, long-lived assets held and used
with a carrying amount of $2.5 million were written down to
their fair value of $1.0 million, resulting in asset
impairment charges of $1.5 million which was included in
earnings for the period. We considered all relevant valuation
techniques that could be obtained without undue cost and effort,
and concluded that the discounted cash flow approach continued
to provide the most relevant and reliable means by which to
determine fair value of the long-lived assets held and used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in Active
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Long-lived assets held and used
|
|
$
|
956
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
956
|
|
|
$
|
(1,530
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
956
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
956
|
|
|
$
|
(1,530
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal 2009 these impairment charges related to seven
underperforming locations, of which three were opened during
fiscal 2006 and two are located in the Detroit, Michigan market
which has been significantly impacted by the economic downturn
and where it appears unlikely that the remaining asset values
can be recovered over the remaining life of the leases. During
2008, we recorded asset impairment charges of $7.1 million
related to 16 underperforming locations, most of which were
built in 2005 and the first half of 2006. Nine are located in
the Midwest region, five in the Mid-Atlantic region and two in
the Northeast region, including four locations closed during the
first quarter of fiscal 2009. In addition, during fiscal 2008,
we recorded asset impairment charges of approximately
$0.1 million related to Seattle locations that are reported
in discontinued operations. We recorded asset impairment charges
of $3.8 million in fiscal 2007 attributable to seven
underperforming locations determined to be impaired, including
one location that was closed during the third quarter of fiscal
2008. In addition, during fiscal 2007, we recorded impairment
charges of $3.4 million related to six Macys Inc.
(Macys) and three Seattle locations, which are
reported in discontinued operations.
51
COSI,
INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Accounting
for Lease Obligations
We recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis over the
lease term commencing on the date we take possession. We record
landlord allowances as deferred rent in other long-term
liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and amortize them
on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease.
Intangibles,
Security Deposits and Other Assets
Intangibles and other assets consist of costs associated with
obtaining liquor licenses, trademarks and logos. Liquor licenses
are stated at cost which is not in excess of market value.
Security deposits primarily consist of deposits placed on leased
locations.
In accordance with ASC
350-10,
Intangibles Goodwill and Other, we review
indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment on an annual
basis, or more often if events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amounts of those assets may not be
recoverable. Other intangibles with indefinite lives are not
amortized.
Lease
Termination Charges
Future store closings, if any, resulting from our decision to
close underperforming locations prior to their scheduled lease
expiration dates may result in additional lease termination
charges. For all exit activities, we estimate our likely
liability under contractual leases for restaurants that have
been closed. Such estimates have affected the amount and timing
of charges to operating results and are impacted by
managements judgments about the time it may take to find a
suitable subtenant or assignee, or the terms under which a
termination of the lease agreement may be negotiated with the
landlord. The Company recognizes costs associated with exit or
disposal activities when they are incurred, rather than at the
date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan.
We recorded lease termination charges of approximately
$0.3 million during fiscal 2009 related primarily to an
underperforming location in the Midwest where we reached an
early exit agreement with the landlord and closed the location
during the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and also to charges
associated with our exercise of a provision in the lease for our
support center allowing us to reduce our leased office space.
During fiscal 2008, we recorded lease termination charges of
approximately $0.6 million primarily related to a location
where we made the decision to not build a restaurant subsequent
to entering into a lease, and reached an agreement with the
landlord to exit the lease, and to three underperforming
locations in the Midwest region where we reached exit agreements
with the landlords. One of these underperforming locations was
closed during the third quarter of fiscal 2008 and the other two
were closed during the first quarter of fiscal 2009. In fiscal
2007 we recorded lease termination expense of approximately
$0.3 million related to a location where, due to the
enforcement of restrictions in a zoning overlay district, Cosi
was denied the necessary permits to build a restaurant and we
exercised the exit provision under the lease, and to an
underperforming restaurant in Chicago where we exercised an
early exit provision of the lease and exited the location in the
first quarter of fiscal 2008.
52
COSI,
INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
A summary of lease termination reserve activity is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
Charged to costs and expenses
|
|
|
347
|
|
Deductions and adjustments
|
|
|
(518
|
)(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
260
|
|
Charged to costs and expenses
|
|
|
551
|
|
Deductions and adjustments
|
|
|
57
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2008
|
|
|
868
|
|
Charged to costs and expenses
|
|
|
322
|
|
Deductions and adjustments
|
|
|
(405
|
)(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 28, 2009
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Payments to landlords for lease obligations. Deductions and
adjustments include payments to landlords for lease obligations. |
Other
Liabilities
Other liabilities consist of deferred rent, landlord allowances
and accrued lease termination costs (see Note 12).
Income
Taxes
We have recorded a full valuation allowance to reduce our
deferred tax assets that relate primarily to net operating loss
carryforwards. Our determination of the valuation allowance is
based on an evaluation of whether it is more likely than not
that we will be able to utilize the net operating loss
carryforwards based on the Companys operating results. A
positive adjustment to income will be recorded in future years
if we determine that we could realize these deferred tax assets.
As of December 28, 2009, we had net operating loss
(NOL) carryforwards of approximately $187,534,774
for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Under the Internal
Revenue Code, an ownership change with respect to a
corporation can significantly limit the amount of pre-ownership
change NOLs and certain other tax assets that the corporation
may utilize after the ownership change to offset future taxable
income, possibly reducing the amount of cash available to the
corporation to satisfy its obligations. An ownership change
generally would occur if the aggregate stock ownership of
holders of at least 5% of our stock increases by more than
50 percentage points over the preceding three year period.
We do not believe that the recent rights offering (see
Note 9) has triggered an ownership change. In addition
a limitation would not have an impact on our consolidated
financial statements as we have recorded a valuation allowance
for the entire amount of our deferred tax assets.
In fiscal 2007, we adopted ASC
740-10,
Income Taxes, which prescribes a comprehensive financial
statement model of how a company should recognize, measure,
present and disclose uncertain tax positions that the company
has taken or expects to take in its income tax returns. The
standard requires that only income tax benefits that meet the
more likely than not recognition threshold be
recognized or continue to be recognized on the effective date.
Initial recognition amounts would have been reported as a
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle.
No adjustment was made to the beginning retained earnings
balance in fiscal 2007, as the ultimate deductibility of all tax
positions is highly certain but there is uncertainty about the
timing of such deductibility. No interest or penalties have been
accrued relative to tax positions due to the Company having
either a tax loss or net operating
53
COSI,
INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
loss carryforwards to offset any taxable income in all subject
years. As a result, no liability for uncertain tax positions has
been recorded.
Should the Company need to accrue interest or penalties on
uncertain tax positions, it would recognize the interest as
interest expense and the penalties as a general and
administrative expense.
Due to our unexpired NOLs, Cosi could be subject to IRS income
tax examination for the tax year 1996 and all subsequent years.
We could also be subject to state income tax examinations in
certain states where we have unexpired NOLs.
Revenue
Recognition
Restaurant Net Sales. Our Company-owned
restaurant sales are composed almost entirely of food and
beverage sales. We record revenue at the time of the purchase of
our products by our customers.
Franchise Fees and Royalties. Franchise fees
and royalties includes fees earned from franchise agreements
entered into with area developers and franchise operators, as
well as royalties received based on sales generated at
franchised restaurants. We recognize the franchise fee in the
period in which a franchise location opens or when fees are
forfeited as a result of a termination of an area developer
agreement. We recognize franchise royalties in the period in
which sales are made by our franchise operators.
Gift Card Sales. We offer our customers the
opportunity to purchase gift cards at our restaurants and
through our website. Customers can purchase these cards at
varying dollar amounts. At the time of purchase by the customer,
we record a gift card liability for the face value of the card
purchased. We recognize the revenue and reduce the gift card
liability when the gift card is redeemed. We do not reduce our
recorded liability for potential non-use of purchased gift cards.
Gain
on Sale of Assets
During fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2007, we recognized income of
$0.1 million and $0.02 million, respectively, from the
sale of liquor licenses. We did not recognize any income from
the sale of assets during fiscal 2008.
Restaurant
Pre-opening Expenses
Restaurant pre-opening expenses are expensed as incurred and
include the costs of recruiting, hiring and training the initial
restaurant work force, travel, the cost of food and labor used
during the period before opening, the cost of initial quantities
of supplies and other direct costs related to the opening or
remodeling of a restaurant. Pre-opening expenses also include
rent expense recognized on a straight-line basis from the date
we take possession through the period of construction,
renovation and fixturing prior to opening the restaurant.
Advertising
Costs
Domestic franchise-operated Cosi restaurants contribute 1% of
their sales to a national marketing fund and are also required
to spend 1% of their sales on advertising in their local
markets. Our international franchise-operated restaurants
contribute 0.5% of their sales to an international marketing
fund. The Company also contributes 1% of sales from
Company-owned restaurants to the national marketing fund. The
Companys contributions to the national marketing fund, as
well as its own local market media costs, are recorded as part
of occupancy and other restaurant operating expenses in the
Companys consolidated statements of operations.
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and approximated
$1.9 million, $1.7 million, and $1.9 million for
fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
54
COSI,
INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Net
Loss Per Share
In 2009, we adopted FASB Staff Position (FSP)
No. EITF 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Shared-Based
Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities,
(ASC
260-10).
This adoption of this FSP did not have a material effect on
previously reported basic and diluted net loss per common share.
Basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed by
dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of common
shares and dilutive common share equivalents, if any,
outstanding during the period. There were no outstanding
in-the-money
stock options or warrants to purchase common stock as of
December 28, 2009 or December 29, 2008.
In-the-money
stock options and warrants to purchase an aggregate of
32,744 shares of common stock were outstanding at
December 31, 2007. There were 87,200, 164,050 and 919,800
unvested restricted shares at December 28, 2009,
December 29, 2008 and at December 31, 2007,
respectively. At December 28, 2009 and at December 29,
2008 there were, respectively, 110,000 and 265,000 unvested
restricted stock units. The unvested restricted shares meet the
requirements for participating securities and were included in
the computation of diluted earnings per share. The unvested
stock units do not meet the requirements for participating
securities and were not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share. The
in-the-money
stock options and outstanding warrants, were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share because we incurred a
net loss in all periods presented and, hence, the impact would
be anti-dilutive.
Out-of-the-money
stock options to purchase an aggregate of 662,534 and
1,304,070 shares of common stock were outstanding at
December 28, 2009 and December 29, 2008, respectively.
On December 31, 2007
out-of-the-money
stock options and warrants to purchase an aggregate
1,780,863 shares of common stock were outstanding.
Stock-Based
Compensation
In accordance with ASC
718-10-25
Compensation Stock Compensation we recognize
stock-based compensation expense according to the fair value
recognition provision which generally requires, among other
things, that all employee share-based compensation be measured
using a fair value method and that all the resulting
compensation expense be recognized in the financial statements.
At adoption of the standard the Company selected the modified
prospective method. In accordance with the standard, our
stock-based compensation expense is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the
award, which is the vesting term. As a result, we recognized
stock compensation expense of $1.0 million,
$1.3 million and $2.0 million, during fiscal years
2009, 2008 and 2007 respectively. We measure the estimated fair
value of our granted stock options using a Black-Scholes pricing
model and of our restricted stock based on the fair market value
of a share of registered stock on the date of the grant.
Segment
Information
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise
about which separate financial information is available and is
evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in
deciding how to allocate resources in assessing performance. Our
chief operating decision maker reviews one aggregated set of
financial statements to make decisions about resource
allocations and to assess performance. Consequently, we have one
reportable segment for all sales generated.
Accounting
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ
from those estimates.
55
COSI,
INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB has issued Update
No. 2010-06,
which provides updated guidance on disclosure requirements under
ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (formerly
SFAS 157, Fair Value Measures). We will adopt
this standard during the first quarter of fiscal 2010. We
currently do not expect that the adoption of this update will
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In addition, we have adopted Update
No. 2009-05
(Update
2005-5)
which provides guidance on measuring the fair value of
liabilities under ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (formerly SFAS 157, Fair Value
Measures). We have also adopted all provisions of ASC
820-10
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (formerly
SFAS 157, Fair Value Measures,
SFAS 157-2,Effective
Date of FASB Statement No. 157,
SFAS 157-4
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased
and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly), which
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and enhances
disclosures about fair value measures required under other
accounting pronouncements, provides guidance in determining the
fair value of a financial asset when the market for that
financial asset is inactive, and also provides additional
guidance for estimating fair value when the volume and level of
activity for the asset or liability have significantly
decreased. The application of these standards did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Effective September 28, 2009, we adopted Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC or the
Codification)
105-10
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (formerly
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification
and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles a replacement of FASB Statement
162), which provides for the Codification to become the
single official source of authoritative, nongovernmental
U.S. GAAP. The Codification does not change U.S. GAAP,
but combines all authoritative standards into a comprehensive,
topically organized online database. The adoption of ASC
105-10-05
impacted the Companys financial statements disclosures, as
all references to authoritative accounting literature will be in
accordance with the Codification.
Effective June 30, 2009, we adopted ASC
855-10
Subsequent Events (formerly SFAS 165,
Subsequent Events), which establishes general
standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur
after the balance sheet date, but before financial statements
are issued or are available to be issued.
Effective December 30, 2008, we adopted ASC
805-10
Business Combinations (formerly SFAS 141R,
Business Combinations), which establishes principles
and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes
and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree. The statement also provides guidance
for recognizing and measuring goodwill acquired in the business
combination and determines what information to disclose to
enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature
and financial effects of the business combination. We have
adopted this standard and its impact cannot be determined until
an acquisition is consummated.
Effective December 30, 2008, we adopted ASC
810-10
Consolidation (formerly SFAS 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an amendment of ARB 51), which amends
previously issued guidance to establish accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and
for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary, which is sometimes
referred to as a minority interest, is an ownership interest in
the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the
consolidated financial statements. Among other requirements, ASC
810-10
requires that the consolidated net income attributable to the
parent and the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and
presented on the face of the consolidated income statement. The
adoption of this standard did not have an impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
Effective December 30, 2008, we adopted ASC
815-10
Derivatives and Hedging (formerly SFAS 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities), which amends and expands previously existing
guidance on derivative instruments to require tabular disclosure
of the fair value of derivative instruments
56
COSI,
INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
and their gains and losses. It also requires disclosure
regarding the credit-risk related contingent features in
derivative agreements, counterparty credit risk, and strategies
and objectives for using derivative instruments. The adoption of
this standard did not have an impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
Accounts receivable consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, trade
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
Due from franchisees
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
Other
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
942
|
|
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
560
|
|
|
$
|
916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the reserve for doubtful accounts follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Charged to costs and expenses
|
|
|
12
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
(13
|
)(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
3
|
|
Charged to costs and expenses
|
|
|
18
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
5
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2008
|
|
|
26
|
|
Charged to costs and expenses
|
|
|
120
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
(30
|
)(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 28, 2009
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Recovery (write-off) of uncollectible accounts. |
|
|
3.
|
Prepaid
Expenses and Other Current Assets
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Prepaid insurance
|
|
$
|
1,559
|
|
|
$
|
1,640
|
|
Prepaid rent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
Other
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
$
|
2,136
|
|
|
$
|
3,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
COSI,
INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
4.
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
During the third quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company reached an
agreement with Macys Inc. (Macys)
relating to six Cosi restaurants operated within Macys
stores. Under the terms of the agreement, we ceased operations
and closed those locations on August 19, 2007.
In addition, we sold the assets of three underperforming
Company-owned locations that operated in the state of Washington
to a local restaurant development company. Under the terms of
the agreement, we transferred rights to the assets and leasehold
improvements for minimal cash consideration and the new owner
assumed the tenant obligations under the real estate operating
leases and is operating those locations under a different brand.
We ceased operating these restaurants as of the end of the first
quarter of fiscal 2008.
In accordance with ASC
360-10-45,
Property, Plant, Equipment, we have reported the results
of operations of this group in discontinued operations in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements for all periods
presented. During fiscals 2008 and 2007, the operating loss from
discontinued operations was $0.2 million and
$0.9 million, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurant net sales
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
373
|
|
|
$
|
3,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of food and beverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
949
|
|
Restaurant labor and related expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
1,580
|
|
Occupancy and other restaurant operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
3,697
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
Closed store costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
4,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(224
|
)
|
|
$
|
(903
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, we recorded charges of $0.1 million and
$3.4 million during fiscals 2008 and 2007, respectively,
related to the impairment of the assets at the Seattle and
Macys locations that are reported in discontinued
operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
58
COSI,
INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
Furniture
and Fixtures, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements
|
Furniture and fixtures, equipment and leasehold improvements
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
$
|
41,652
|
|
|
$
|
42,997
|
|
Restaurant equipment
|
|
|
19,826
|
|
|
|
20,174
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
13,571
|
|
|
|
13,922
|
|
Computer and telephone equipment
|
|
|
12,164
|
|
|
|
11,901
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total furniture and fixtures, equipment and leasehold
improvements
|
|
|
87,243
|
|
|
|
89,093
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(65,143
|
)
|
|
|
(59,314
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture and fixtures, equipment and leasehold improvements, net
|
|
$
|
22,100
|
|
|
$
|
29,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense for fiscals 2009, 2008 and
2007 was $7.1 million, $8.4 million, and
$9.2 million, respectively.
|
|
6.
|
Intangibles,
Security Deposits and Other Assets
|
Intangibles, security deposits and other assets consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Security deposits
|
|
$
|
874
|
|
|
$
|
949
|
|
Liquor licenses
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
Other
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
$
|
1,728
|
|
|
$
|
1,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Payroll and related benefits and taxes
|
|
$
|
2,040
|
|
|
$
|
1,873
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
1,652
|
|
|
|
1,596
|
|
Unredeemed gift cards/certificates
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
Utilities
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
Taxes other than income taxes
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
Rent
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
Professional and legal
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
960
|
|
Deferred credits
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
Other
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
COSI,
INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Significant components of our deferred tax assets, net of any
deferred tax liabilities, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforward
|
|
$
|
71,263
|
|
|
$
|
66,867
|
|
Depreciation expense and impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
17,617
|
|
|
|
18,260
|
|
Contractual lease increases
|
|
|
1,675
|
|
|
|
1,744
|
|
Deferred franchise revenue
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
964
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
940
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
Lease termination accrual
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
93,451
|
|
|
|
89,285
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(93,451
|
)
|
|
|
(89,285
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred taxes
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 28, 2009, we have federal net operating tax
loss carryforwards of approximately $187.5 million which,
if not used, will expire from 2015 through 2027. The Company has
recorded a valuation allowance to offset the benefit associated
with the deferred tax assets described above due to the
uncertainty of realizing the related benefits.
Below is a reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax
rate to the effective tax rate as a percentage of income before
income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Statutory federal income tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.0
|
|
|
|
38.0
|
|
|
|
38.0
|
|
Less valuation allowance
|
|
|
(38.0
|
)
|
|
|
(38.0
|
)
|
|
|
(38.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Tax Rate
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the Internal Revenue Code, an ownership change
with respect to a corporation can significantly limit the amount
of pre-ownership change NOLs and certain other tax assets that
the corporation may utilize after the ownership change to offset
future taxable income, possibly reducing the amount of cash
available to the corporation to satisfy its obligations. An
ownership change generally would occur if the aggregate stock
ownership of holders of at least 5% of our stock increases by
more than 50 percentage points over the preceding three
year period. We do not believe that the recent rights offering
(see Note 9) has triggered an ownership change. In
addition a limitation would not have an impact on our
consolidated financial statements as we have recorded a
valuation allowance for the entire amount of our deferred tax
assets.
60
COSI,
INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Common
Stock Purchase Rights
On November 18, 2002, the Board of Directors resolved to
adopt a Shareholders Rights Plan (Rights
Plan). At that time the Board declared a dividend
distribution of one right (Right) for each share of
common stock to shareholders of record on November 25,
2002. Each Right entitles the registered holder to purchase from
us one one-hundredth of a share of our preferred stock
designated as Series D Preferred Stock at a price of $100
per one one-hundredth of a share. The Board of Directors also
resolved to amend its certificate of incorporation, to designate
1,000,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock for such
issuance.
The exercise price and the number of Series D preferred
shares issuable upon exercise are subject to adjustments from
time to time to prevent dilution. The share purchase rights are
not exercisable until the earlier to occur of
(1) 10 days following a public announcement that a
person or group of affiliated or associated persons, referred to
as an acquiring person, have acquired beneficial ownership of
15% or more of our outstanding voting common stock or
(2) 10 business days following the commencement of, or
announcement of an intention to make, a tender offer or exchange
offer which would result in an acquiring person beneficially
owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting shares of common
stock.
If we are acquired in a merger or other business combination, or
if more than 50% of our consolidated assets or earning power is
sold after a person or group has become an acquiring person,
proper provision will be made so that each holder of a share
purchase right other than share purchase rights
beneficially owned by the acquiring person, which will
thereafter be void will have the right to receive,
upon exercise of the share purchase right at the then current
exercise price, the number of shares of common stock of the
acquiring company which at the time of the transaction have a
market value of two times the exercise price. If any person or
group becomes an acquiring person, proper provision shall be
made so that each holder of a share purchase right
other than share purchase rights beneficially owned
by the acquiring person, which will thereafter be
void will have the right to receive upon exercise of
the share purchase right at the then current exercise price, the
number of shares of Series D preferred stock with a market
value at the time of the transaction equal to two times the
exercise price.
Series D preferred shares issuable upon exercise of the
share purchase rights will not be redeemable. Each Series D
preferred share will be entitled to a minimum preferential
dividend payment of $.10 per share and will be entitled to an
aggregate dividend of 100 times the cash dividend declared per
share of common stock. In the event we are liquidated, the
holders of the Series D preferred shares will be entitled
to receive a payment in an amount equal to the greater of $100
per one one-hundredth share or 100 times the payment made per
share of common stock. Each Series D preferred share will
have 100 votes, voting together with the shares of common stock.
Finally, in the event of any merger, consolidation or other
transaction in which shares of common stock are exchanged, each
Series D preferred share will be entitled to receive 100
times the amount received per share of common stock. These
rights are protected by customary antidilution provisions.
Before the date the Rights are exercisable, the Rights may not
be detached or transferred separately from the common stock. The
Rights will expire in 2012, or, if the Rights become exercisable
before 2012, at the close of business on the 90th day
following such date the Rights become exercisable, provided that
the Companys Board of Directors does not extend or
otherwise modify the Rights. At any time on or prior to 10
business days following the time an acquiring person acquires
beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the Companys
outstanding voting common stock, the Companys Board of
Directors may redeem the Rights in whole, but not in part, at a
price of $.01 per Right. Immediately upon any Rights redemption,
the exercised Rights terminate, and the holders will only be
entitled to receive the redemption price.
As of December 28, 2009, none of these stock purchase
rights have been exercised.
61
COSI,
INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Stock
Purchase Warrants
As of December 28, 2009 and December 29, 2008 there
were no stock purchase warrants outstanding. Warrants, issued in
conjunction with previous equity and debt securities, to
purchase 29,189 shares of our common stock were outstanding
as of December 31, 2007. These warrants had an exercise
price of $.01 per share and expired at varying dates through
October 2008.
Rights
Offering
On January 6, 2010, we completed a shareholders rights
offering to our shareholders of record as of November 9,
2009. We issued a total of 10,000,000 shares of our
$0.01 par value common stock at a subscription price of
$0.50 per share. In conjunction with the rights offering, all of
our executive officers and outside directors purchased an
aggregate 451,677 shares of our $0.01 par value common
stock, at a subscription price of $0.50 per share, through a
private placement. We received net proceeds of $4.9 million
from the offering and the private placement.
|
|
10.
|
Stock-Based
Employee Compensation
|
We have had several long-term incentive compensation plans,
including the Amended and Restated Cosi, Inc. Long-Term
Incentive Plan, that provided for the granting of incentive and
nonqualified stock options to employees. On May 2, 2005,
the Cosi, Inc. 2005 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (the
Omnibus Plan) went into effect, superseding all
prior long-term incentive plans. The Omnibus Plan provides for
the issuance of restricted stock, restricted stock units,
incentive and nonqualified stock options, and any other stock
awards that may be payable in shares, cash, other securities,
and any other form of property as may be determined by the
Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. The purpose of
this plan is to attract and retain qualified individuals and to
align their interest with those of stockholders by providing
certain employees of Cosi, Inc. and its affiliates with the
opportunity to receive stock-based and other long-term incentive
grants. The terms and conditions of stock-based awards under the
plans are determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors. The grants are issued at fair market value and
generally vest over a period of four years. We currently account
for stock option grants in accordance with ASC
718-10-25
Compensation Stock Compensation.
When the Omnibus Plan went into effect, 3.7 million
authorized but unissued common shares that were reserved under
the Amended and Restated Cosi, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan
continued to be reserved for issuance under the Omnibus Plan. No
additional awards will be granted under any of the prior
long-term incentive plans including the Amended and Restated
Cosi, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan.
As of December 28, 2009, approximately 2.7 million
shares of common stock, in the aggregate, were reserved for
issuance under the Omnibus Plan and for outstanding grants under
the prior long-term incentive plans.
A summary of stock-based compensation follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Stock option compensation expense
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
363
|
|
Restricted stock compensation expense, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
962
|
|
|
|
1,245
|
|
|
|
1,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-cash, stock-based compensation expense, net of
forfeitures
|
|
$
|
1,003
|
|
|
$
|
1,349
|
|
|
$
|
1,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 28, 2009, there was approximately
$0.001 million of total unrecognized compensation expense
related to stock options granted under the Companys
various incentive plans which will be recognized over the
remaining vesting period of the options through fiscal 2010. In
addition, as of December 28, 2009, there was approximately
$0.5 million of total unrecognized compensation expense
related to restricted stock shares and units
62
COSI,
INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
granted under the Omnibus Plan. The expense related to
restricted stock grants will be recognized on a straight-line
basis from the date of each grant through fiscal 2013 and is
recorded in general and administrative expenses in our
consolidated statements of operations.
We measure the estimated fair value of our granted stock options
using a Black-Scholes pricing model and of our restricted stock
based on the fair market value of a share of registered stock on
the date of the grant. Fiscal 2005 was the last year in which we
issued stock option grants. The weighted average fair values of
the options calculated in accordance with ASC
718-10-25
Compensation Stock Compensation were
determined using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the
following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
0%
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
68%
|
Average risk-free interest rate
|
|
3.79%
|
Average expected life of options
|
|
5 years
|
Weighted average grant date fair value
|
|
$3.89
|
ASC
718-10-25
Compensation Stock Compensation also requires
the Company to estimate forfeitures in calculating the expense
relating to stock-based compensation as opposed to recognizing
forfeitures as an expense reduction as they occur. Furthermore,
in accordance with the provisions of ASC
718-10-25
Compensation Stock Compensation, we
reclassified to additional
paid-in-capital
the balance that was in unearned compensation in our
consolidated balance sheet as of January 3, 2006.
The expected volatility is based on an average of the historical
volatility of the Companys stock, the implied volatility
of market options, peer company volatility, and other factors.
The average expected life represents the period of time that
option grants are expected to be outstanding and is derived from
historical terms and other factors. The risk-free interest rate
is based on the rate of U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues
with remaining term equal to the expected life of option grants.
Pre-vesting forfeiture rates are estimated based on historical
data.
A summary of option activity for fiscals 2009, 2008 and 2007
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average Exercise
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Outstanding as of January 1, 2007
|
|
|
3,279,008
|
|
|
$
|
6.32
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
$
|
4,339
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(989,240
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/Expired
|
|
|
(505,075
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,784,693
|
|
|
$
|
7.76
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(23,971
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/Expired
|
|
|
(456,652
|
)
|
|
$
|
8.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of December 29, 2008
|
|
|
1,304,070
|
|
|
$
|
7.60
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/Expired
|
|
|
(641,536
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of December 28, 2009
|
|
|
662,534
|
|
|
$
|
9.96
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Exercisable as of December 28, 2009
|
|
|
656,973
|
|
|
$
|
9.99
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
COSI,
INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
There were no stock options exercised during the fiscal year
ended December 28, 2009. The total intrinsic value of
options exercised during the fiscal years ended
December 29, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was
$0.01 million and $2.9 million, respectively. The
total fair value of the options that vested during fiscal 2009
was $0.1 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Total Exercisable at the end of the Year:
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
As of December 28, 2009
|
|
|
656,973
|
|
|
$
|
9.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 29, 2008
|
|
|
1,274,705
|
|
|
$
|
7.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,638,067
|
|
|
$
|
7.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding at December 28, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Average
|
|
Number of
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Options
|
|
Exercise
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Life in Years
|
|
Price
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Price
|
|
$1.36 - $ 2.04
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
$2.09 - $ 3.14
|
|
|
33,701
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
33,701
|
|
|
|
2.28
|
|
$4.33 - $ 6.50
|
|
|
163,409
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
5.13
|
|
|
|
158,018
|
|
|
|
5.10
|
|
$6.52 - $ 9.78
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
6.68
|
|
|
|
2,080
|
|
|
|
6.66
|
|
$9.84 - $12.25
|
|
|
462,789
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
12.25
|
|
|
|
462,789
|
|
|
|
12.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
662,534
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
9.96
|
|
|
|
656,973
|
|
|
$
|
9.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal 2009, pursuant to the Omnibus Plan and in
accordance with the terms and conditions prescribed by the
Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors, we granted and
issued 10,000 shares of our authorized but unissued common
stock to a key employee. The vesting of these restricted shares
will occur as follows: (i) 20% of the shares vested on the
grant date: and (ii) an additional 20% of the shares will
vest on each anniversary of the grant date provided that at each
such date the employee continues to be employed by the Company.
The value of the shares for this grant, based on the closing
price of our common stock on the date of the grant, was
approximately $0.01 million. Approximately
$0.002 million related to this grant is included in
stock-based compensation expense in the accompanying
consolidated statement of operations for fiscal 2009. During
fiscal 2009, 6,000 previously issued shares of restricted common
stock were forfeited. The value of the forfeited shares, based
on the closing price of our common stock on the dates of the
grants, was approximately $0.04 million.
64
COSI,
INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following tables summarize the Companys restricted
stock activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Non-vested at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
1,149,700
|
|
|
$
|
7.48
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
698,250
|
|
|
|
3.73
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
353,700
|
|
|
|
6.44
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(574,450
|
)
|
|
|
7.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
919,800
|
|
|
$
|
5.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
2.87
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
288,600
|
|
|
|
4.95
|
|
Forfeited/Canceled
|
|
|
(517,150
|
)
|
|
|
4.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 29, 2008
|
|
|
164,050
|
|
|
$
|
5.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
80,850
|
|
|
|
6.47
|
|
Forfeited/Canceled
|
|
|
(6,000
|
)
|
|
|
7.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 28,2009
|
|
|
87,200
|
|
|
$
|
5.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
265,000
|
|
|
|
3.24
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 29, 2008
|
|
|
265,000
|
|
|
|
3.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
|
|
3.24
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 28, 2009
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
$
|
3.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, on May 27, 2009, we issued 195,310 shares
of restricted common stock to certain members of the Board of
Directors pursuant to the Cosi Non-Employee Director Stock
Incentive Plan and the Omnibus Plan that are not included in the
table above. These shares had an aggregate value of
approximately $0.1 million and vested upon issuance.
|
|
11.
|
Defined
Contribution Plan
|
We have a 401(k) Plan (the Plan) for all qualified
employees. The Plan provides for a matching employer
contribution of 50% up to the first 4% of the employees
deferred savings. The employer contributions made during the
employees first year of employment vest upon the
completion of one year of employment. Employer contributions
made subsequent to the first year of employment vest
immediately. The deferred amount cannot exceed 20% of an
individual participants compensation in any calendar year.
Our contributions to the Plan were
65
COSI,
INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
approximately $0.04 million for fiscal year 2009 and
$0.1 million for both fiscal years 2008 and 2007. During
fiscal 2009, as part of various cost containment initiatives, we
suspended the employer matching contribution to the Plan.
|
|
12.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Commitments
As of December 28, 2009, we are committed under lease
agreements expiring through 2019 for occupancy of our retail
restaurants and for office space at the following minimum annual
rentals:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
15,598
|
|
2011
|
|
|
14,371
|
|
2012
|
|
|
12,650
|
|
2013
|
|
|
9,682
|
|
2014
|
|
|
7,456
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
10,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
70,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts shown are net of approximately $0.1 million of
sublease rental income under non-cancelable subleases. Rental
expense for fiscals 2009, 2008 and 2007 totaled $15.0, $16.0 and
$15.8 million, respectively. Certain lease agreements have
renewal options ranging from 3 years to 15 years. In
addition, certain leases obligate us to pay additional rent if
restaurant sales reach certain minimum levels (percentage rent).
Amounts incurred under these additional rent provisions and
agreements were approximately $0.2 million,
$0.3 million, and $0.5 million, for fiscal years 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
Certain of our lease agreements provide for scheduled rent
increases during the lease term or for rental payments to
commence at a date other than the date of initial occupancy.
Rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
term of the respective leases from the date we take possession.
Our obligation with respect to these scheduled rent increases
has been presented as a long-term liability in other liabilities
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and totaled
$4.4 million and $4.6 million as of the end of fiscal
2009 and 2008, respectively.
Certain of our leases also provide for landlord contributions to
offset a portion of the cost of our leasehold improvements.
These allowances are recorded as deferred liabilities and
amortized on a straight-line basis as a reduction to rent
expense over the term of the related leases. Included in other
long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets for fiscals 2009 and 2008 were landlord allowances of
$1.2 million and $1.5 million, respectively.
As of December 28, 2009, the Company had outstanding
approximately $0.2 million in standby letters of credit,
which were provided as security deposits for certain of the
lease obligations. The letters of credit are fully secured by
cash deposits or marketable securities held in accounts at the
issuing banks and are not available for withdrawal by the
Company. These amounts are included as a component of
Intangibles, Security Deposits and Other Assets in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
We recorded lease termination charges of approximately
$0.3 million during fiscal 2009 related primarily to an
underperforming location in the Midwest where we reached an
early exit agreement with the landlord and to charges associated
with our exercise of a provision allowing for the contraction of
our support center office. During fiscal 2008, we recorded lease
termination charges of approximately $0.6 million primarily
related to a location where we made the decision to not build a
restaurant subsequent to entering into a lease and reached an
agreement with the landlord to exit the lease, and to three
underperforming locations in the Midwest region where we reached
66
COSI,
INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
exit agreements with the landlords. One of these underperforming
locations was closed during the third quarter of fiscal 2008 and
the other two were closed during the first quarter of fiscal
2009.
As of December 28, 2009, future minimum lease payments
related to restaurants that have been closed is approximately
$5.3 million, net of expected sublease payments, with
remaining lease terms ranging from two to eight years. For each
of these locations, a lease termination reserve has been
established based upon managements estimate of the cost to
exit the lease. Other liabilities in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as of December 28, 2009 includes
$0.8 million in accrued lease termination costs (including
a current portion of $0.3 million), $4.4 million in
accrued contractual lease increases and $1.2 million in
landlord allowances (including a current portion of
$0.3 million). Other liabilities in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as of December 29, 2008 includes
$0.9 million in accrued lease termination costs (including
a current portion of $0.3 million), $4.6 million in
accrued contractual lease increases and $1.5 million in
landlord allowances (including a current portion of
$0.3 million).
In fiscal 2001, we entered into a settlement agreement involving
a trademark dispute. The settlement agreement requires us to
make annual payments of $25,000 through 2011. The estimated
present value of those future payments is included in other
liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
During fiscal 2008, we entered into a settlement agreement
involving a claim from a former employee. The settlement
agreement requires us to pay $0.3 million in an initial
payment during the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and another
$1.0 million in the aggregate in non-interest bearing
monthly installments thereafter through 2012. The amount of this
settlement is included in other liabilities in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
During fiscal 2009, we entered into a settlement agreement
involving a customer claim alleging damages under the American
with Disabilities Act with regard to access at our restaurants.
The settlement requires us to pay $0.08 million in the
aggregate in non-interest bearing quarterly installments
commencing in fiscal 2010 through fiscal 2012. The amount of
this settlement is included in other liabilities in the
accompanying consolidated 2009 balance sheet.
Purchase
Commitments
We have an agreement with Distribution Market Advantage, Inc.
(Distribution Marketing Advantage) that provides us
access to a national network of independent distributors. Under
this agreement the independent distributors supply us with
approximately 78% of our food and paper products, primarily
under pricing agreements that we negotiate directly with the
suppliers. This agreement expires in November 2010 and we have
issued a request for proposal to Distribution Marketing
Advantage and other distribution organizations. We expect to
complete the review and evaluation of proposals during the
second quarter of fiscal 2010.
We have a long-term beverage marketing agreement with the
Coca-Cola
Company. We received a marketing allowance under this agreement,
which is being recognized as a reduction to expense ratably
based on actual products purchased. Although we are eligible to
receive additional amounts under the agreement if certain
purchase levels are achieved, no additional amounts have been
received or recorded as of December 28, 2009.
We purchase all contracted coffee products through a single
supplier, Coffee Bean International, Inc. (Coffee Bean
International). In the event of a business interruption,
Coffee Bean International is required to utilize the services of
a third-party roaster to fulfill its obligations. If the
services of a third-party roaster are used, Coffee Bean
International will guarantee that the product fulfillment
standards stated in our contract will remain in effect
throughout such business interruption period. This agreement
expires in June 2010 and we have issued a request for a proposal
to Coffee Bean International and other coffee suppliers. We will
conclude the review and evaluation of proposals prior to the
expiration of the current contract.
67
COSI,
INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Self-Insurance
We have a self-insured group health insurance plan. We are
responsible for all covered claims to a maximum liability of
$100,000 per participant during a plan year. Benefits paid in
excess of $100,000 are reimbursed to the plan under our
stop-loss policy. In addition, we have an aggregate stop-loss
policy whereby our liability for total claims submitted cannot
exceed a pre-determined dollar factor based upon, among other
things, past years claims experience, actual claims paid,
the number of plan participants and monthly accumulated
aggregate deductibles. During fiscals 2009, 2008, and 2007, we
did not exceed this pre-determined maximum. For our 2010 plan
year, this pre-determined dollar amount is $2.5 million.
Health insurance expense for fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007
was $1.8 million, $1.9 million and $2.2 million,
respectively. The balance in the self-insurance reserve account
was $0.5 million at December 28, 2009 and
$0.4 million at December 29, 2008.
Litigation
From time to time, we are a defendant in litigation arising in
the ordinary course of our business, including, but not limited
to, claims resulting from slip and fall accidents,
claims under federal and state laws governing access to public
accommodations or other federal and state laws applicable to our
business operations, employment-related claims, property
damages, claims from guests alleging illness, injury or other
food quality, health or operational concerns, and enforcement of
intellectual property rights.
On February 23, 2009, the Company commenced an action in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of
New York to recover, under Section 16(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, short-swing profits realized
by a stockholder of the Company in connection with certain
purchases and sales of the Companys common stock by the
stockholder. On July 7, 2009, the parties entered into an
agreement to settle the claims, which agreement was subject to
court approval. The parties reached a settlement and the Company
received a settlement of $0.4 million.
68
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
COSI, INC.
William Koziel
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: March 29, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, this Report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MARK
DEMILIO
Mark
Demilio
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
March 29, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JAMES
F. HYATT
James
F. Hyatt
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
March 29, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ WILLIAM
E. KOZIEL
William
E. Koziel
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
March 29, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ CREED
L. FORD III
Creed
L. Ford III
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ROBERT
MERRITT
Robert
Merritt
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MICHAEL
ODONNELL
Michael
ODonnell
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ KARL
S. OKAMOTO
Karl
S. Okamoto
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29, 2010
|
69
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Merger Agreement by and among Xando, Incorporated, Xando Merger
Corp. and Cosi Sandwich Bar, Inc. dated as of October 4,
1999 (Filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
file #333-86390).
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cosi, Inc.
(Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the period ended December 30, 2002).
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of Cosi, Inc. (Filed as
Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended October 1, 2007).
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Form of Certificate of Common Stock (Filed as Exhibit 4.1
to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
file #333-86390).
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Rights Agreement between Cosi, Inc. and American Stock Transfer
and Trust Company as Rights Agent dated November 21,
2002 (Filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the period ended December 30, 2002).
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Registration Agreement, dated as of
March 30, 1999 (Filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the
Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
file #333-86390).
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Supplemental Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of
August 5, 2003 by and among the Company and the parties
thereto (Filed as Exhibit 4.4.2 to the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
file #333-107689).
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement dated as of
November 21, 2002, between Cosi, Inc. and American Stock
Transfer and Trust Company, as rights agent (Filed as
Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003).
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Amendment dated as of January 6, 2010, to Rights Agreement
dated as of November 21, 2002, between Cosi, Inc. and
American Stock Transfer Company, as rights agent (Filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated January 6, 2010).
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Cosi, Inc. 2005 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (Filed as
Exhibit C to the Companys Proxy Statement on
Schedule 14A filed on March 31, 2005, file #000-50052.
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Cosi Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to
the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
file #333-86390).
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Cosi Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan (Filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Registration Statement
on
Form S-1,
file #333-86390).
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Cosi Sandwich Bar, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan (Filed as
Exhibit 10.4 to the Companys Registration Statement
on
Form S-1,
file #333-86390).
|
|
10
|
.5.1
|
|
Terms of Employment between Cosi, Inc. and William E. Koziel,
effective as of August 17, 2005 as described in the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
(Filed on August 23, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.5.2
|
|
Employment agreement, dated as of September 15, 2007 by and
between the Company and James F. Hyatt (Filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated September 18, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.5.3
|
|
General Separation and Release Agreement by and between the
Company and Christopher Ames, dated August 26, 2008 (Filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 29, 2008).
|
|
10
|
.5.4
|
|
General Separation and Release Agreement by and between the
Company and Christopher Carroll, dated August 26, 2008
(Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 29, 2008).
|
|
10
|
.5.5
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement, dated as of December 19,
2008 by and between the Directors and Officers of the Company
(filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report
on
Form 8-K,
dated December 18, 2008).
|
|
10
|
.5.6
|
|
Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated as of
December 18, 2008 by and between William Koziel and the
Company (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated December 18, 2008).
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
|
10
|
.5.7
|
|
Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated as of
December 18, 2008 by and between Vicki Baue and the Company
(filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current Report
on
Form 8-K,
dated December 18, 2008).
|
|
10
|
.5.8
|
|
Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated as of
December 18, 2008 by and between Paul Bower and the Company
(filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current Report
on
Form 8-K,
dated December 18, 2008).
|
|
10
|
.5.9
|
|
Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated as of
December 18, 2008 by and between Becky Iliff and the
Company (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated December 18, 2008).
|
|
10
|
.5.10
|
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of
December 18, 2008 by and between the Company and James
Hyatt (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
dated December 18, 2008).
|
|
10
|
.5.11
|
|
Form of Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2009,
for Jim Hyatt, Bill Koziel, Vicki Baue, Paul Bower, Becky Iliff,
Maggie Martensen, Bob Merritt, Creed Ford, Mark Demilio, Karl
Okamoto and Mike ODonnell (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to
the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-3
(Commission File
No. 333-162233)).
|
|
10
|
.6.1
|
|
Foodservice Distribution Agreement between Cosi, Inc. and
Distribution Market Advantage, Inc. dated as of November 1,
2005.(1)
|
|
10
|
.7.1
|
|
Cosi, Inc. Form of Area Developer Franchise Agreement (Filed as
Exhibit 10.6 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended July 4, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.7.2
|
|
Cosi, Inc. Form of Area Developer Franchise Agreement (Filed as
Exhibit 10.6 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended July 4, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Form of Senior Secured Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement
(Filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Companys Registration
on
Form S-1,
file #333-86390).
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of April 27, 2004
(Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report
on
Form 8-K,
dated April 28, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated June 6, 2005).
|
|
16
|
|
|
Letter from Ernst & Young LLP to the Securities and
Exchange Commission, dated as of August 13, 2004,
acknowledging its agreement with the statements made in Current
Report on
Form 8-K
(Filed as Exhibit 16 to the Companys Current Report
on
Form 8-K,
dated August 13, 2004.
|
|
21
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Cosi, Inc. (Filed as Exhibit 21.1 to the
Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
file #333-86390)
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Filed herewith Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP, Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Filed herewith Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Filed herewith Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Portions of Exhibit 10.6.1 have been omitted and filed
separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant
to a request for confidential treatment. |
71