Attached files

file filename
EX-21 - SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT - AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP LTDdex21.htm
EX-32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF THOMAS MCMAHON PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 - AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP LTDdex322.htm
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002. - AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP LTDdex312.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002. - AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP LTDdex311.htm
EX-10.15 - ADDENDUM TO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT - AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP LTDdex1015.htm
EX-10.16 - EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT - AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP LTDdex1016.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF STUART GRAYSTON PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 - AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP LTDdex321.htm
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

 

x Annual report pursuant to section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

 

or

 

¨ Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the transition period from              to             .

 

000-28249

(Commission file number)

 

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

 

BERMUDA   98-0207447

(State or other jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

c/o Cedar Management Limited

25 Church Street, Continental Building

P.O. Box HM 1601, Hamilton, Bermuda

  HMGX
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)   (Zip Code)

 

(441) 296-3973

(Registrant’s telephone number)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

 

COMMON SHARES, PAR VALUE $1.00 PER SHARE

(Title of class)

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    YES  ¨    NO  x

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15 (d) of the Act.    YES  ¨    NO  x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES  x    NO  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer  ¨

 

Accelerated filer  ¨

Non-accelerated filer  ¨

 

Smaller reporting company  x

(Do not check is a smaller reporting company)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    YES  ¨    NO  x

 

As of March 1, 2010, the registrant had 995,253 common shares, $1.00 par value per share outstanding. The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was $26,632,021 based on book value as of June 30, 2009.

 

Documents Incorporated by Reference

     Incorporated
By Reference
In Part No.

Portions of the Company’s Proxy Statement in connection with the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 10, 2010

   III

 

 

 


Table of Contents

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

 

Annual Report on Form 10-K

For the year ended December 31, 2009

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

               Page

PART I

     
   Item 1.   

Business

   4
   Item 1A.   

Risk Factors

   10
   Item 1B.   

Unresolved Staff Comments

   15
   Item 2.   

Properties

   16
   Item 3.   

Legal Proceedings

   16
   Item 4.   

(Removed and Reserved)

   16

PART II

     
   Item 5.   

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

   16
   Item 6.   

Selected Financial Data

   17
   Item 7.   

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   17
   Item 7A.   

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

   30
   Item 8.   

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

   31
   Item 9.   

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

   52
   Item 9A.   

Controls and Procedures

   52
   Item 9B.   

Other Information

   52

PART III

     
   Item 10.   

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

   53
   Item 11.   

Executive Compensation

   53
   Item 12.   

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters

   53
   Item 13.   

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

   53
   Item 14.   

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

   53

PART IV

     
   Item 15.   

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

   54

Signatures

   55

 

2


Table of Contents

Introductory Note

 

Caution Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

 

Certain statements contained in this Form 10-K, or otherwise made by our officers, including statements related to our future performance, ability to successfully implement a new business plan, and our outlook for our businesses and respective markets, projections, statements of our management’s plans or objectives, forecasts of market trends and other matters, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and contain information relating to us that is based on the beliefs of our management as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, our management. The words “expect,” “believe,” “may” and similar expressions as they relate to us or our management are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect our management’s current views with respect to future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in any forward-looking statements. Our actual future results may differ materially from those set forth in our forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such actual results to differ materially from those reflected in any forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the factors discussed in detail in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this form 10-K, as well as:

 

   

the occurrence of catastrophic events with a frequency or severity exceeding our expectations;

 

   

a decrease in the level of demand for reinsurance or an increase in the supply of reinsurance capacity;

 

   

the successful implementation of the our new business plan;

 

   

a worsening of the current global economic market conditions and global credit crisis and changing rates of inflation and other economic conditions;

 

   

increased competitive pressures, including the consolidation and increased globalization of reinsurance providers;

 

   

actual losses and loss expenses exceeding our loss reserves, which are necessarily based on the actuarial and statistical projections of ultimate losses;

 

   

changes in the legal or regulatory environments in which we operate; and

 

   

other risks, including those risks identified in any of our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

The foregoing review of important factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with other cautionary statements that are included herein. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our management’s analysis only as of the date they are made. We undertake no obligation to release publicly the results of any future revisions we may make to forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

 

3


Table of Contents

PART I

 

Item 1. Business

 

General

 

Unless otherwise indicated by the context, in this annual report we refer to AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. and its subsidiaries as the “Company”, “AmerInst,” “we” or “us.” “AMIC Ltd.” means AmerInst’s wholly-owned subsidiary, AmerInst Insurance Company, Ltd. “APSL” means AmerInst Professional Services, Limited, a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of AmerInst Mezco, Ltd. (“Mezco”) which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AmerInst. “Investco” means AmerInst Investment Company, Ltd., a subsidiary of AMIC Ltd. “AMIG” means our predecessor entity, AmerInst Insurance Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation. Our principal offices are c/o Cedar Management Limited, 25 Church Street, Continental Building, P.O. Box HM 1601, Hamilton, Bermuda, HM GX.

 

AmerInst, a Bermuda holding company, was formed in 1998. Our mission is to be a Company that provides availability of insurance for the Certified Public Accountant (“CPA”) profession, and that engages in investment activities. Our investment portfolio is held and managed by Investco.

 

Entry into Agency Agreement

 

Effective September 25, 2009, APSL entered into an agency agreement (the “Agency Agreement”) with The North River Insurance Company, United States Fire Insurance Company, Crum & Forster Indemnity Company, Crum and Forster Insurance Company, and Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company (collectively, “C&F”) pursuant to which C&F appointed APSL as its exclusive agent for the purposes of soliciting, underwriting, quoting, binding, issuing, cancelling, non-renewing and endorsing accountants’ professional liability and lawyers’ professional liability insurance coverage within the 50 states of the United States and the District of Columbia. The initial term of the Agency Agreement is for four years with automatic one year renewals. No underwriting activity under the Agency Agreement occurred through December 31, 2009.

 

Entry into Reinsurance Agreement

 

We conduct our reinsurance business through AMIC Ltd., our subsidiary, which is a registered insurer in Bermuda. On September 25, 2009, AMIC Ltd. entered into a professional liability quota share agreement with C&F (the “Reinsurance Agreement”) pursuant to which C&F agrees to cede and AMIC Ltd. agrees to accept as reinsurance a fifty percent (50%) quota share of C&F’s liability under insurance written by APSL on behalf of C&F and classified by C&F as accountants’ professional liability and lawyers’ professional liability, subject to AMIC Ltd. surplus limitations. The initial term of the Reinsurance Agreement is for four years with automatic one year renewals. No underwriting activity occurred under the Reinsurance Agreement through December 31, 2009.

 

Historical Relationship with CNA

 

Historically, the primary business activity of our wholly owned insurance subsidiary, AMIC Ltd., had been to act as a reinsurer of professional liability insurance policies that were issued under the Professional Liability Insurance Plan sponsored by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”). The AICPA plan offers professional liability coverage to accounting firms and individual CPAs in all 50 states.

 

Our reinsurance activity depends upon agreements with outside parties. AMIG, our predecessor entity, began our reinsurance relationship with CNA in 1993.

 

On January 5, 2009, AMIC Ltd. received written notice from CNA Financial Corporation (“CNA”) that CNA did not intend to renew the reinsurance program encompassed by the AmerInst Insurance Company

 

4


Table of Contents

Limited Accountants Professional Liability Treaty and the Value Plan Policies Accountants Professional Liability Quota Share Treaty (the “Reinsurance Treaties”). In 2008, the business relationship with CNA accounted for approximately 95% of AmerInst’s net premiums earned.

 

On May 15, 2009, AMIC Ltd. and CNA entered into a Commutation and Release Agreement (the “Commutation Agreement”) whereby:

 

   

Our relationship with CNA terminated effective December 31, 2008;

 

   

AMIC Ltd. paid to CNA $20,550,000 on May 22, 2009;

 

   

CNA released and discharged AMIC Ltd. from any claims or liabilities whatsoever under, arising out of, or in any way related to past Reinsurance Treaties;

 

   

AMIC Ltd. released and discharged CNA from any claims or liabilities whatsoever under, arising out of, or in any way related to the past Reinsurance Treaties;

 

   

All rights, duties, liabilities, and obligations of AMIC Ltd. and CNA under the current Reinsurance Treaties were discharged;

 

   

The 2009 Reinsurance Treaties were rescinded and terminated retroactive to their inception; and

 

   

The 2009 Reinsurance Treaties were void as though they never existed.

 

The Company has reduced its estimated liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses by approximately $5,400,000 to reflect the impact of the Commutation Agreement.

 

Included in net income for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 is earned premium of approximately $2,800,000, losses and loss adjustment expenses and policy acquisition costs of approximately $2,000,000 and $800,000, respectively, relating to the commuted treaties. Since the Commutation Agreement rescinded and terminated the 2009 Reinsurance Treaties retroactive to their inception, such treaties are not recorded in these consolidated financial statements.

 

Historical Relationship with CAMICO

 

From June 1, 2005 through May 31, 2009, we were a party to a reinsurance contract with CAMICO Mutual Insurance Company (“CAMICO”) a California-based writer of accountants’ professionally liability business.

 

Effective June 1, 2009, we decided not to renew the CAMICO contract and permitted the contract to expire pursuant to its terms. In 2008, the business relationship with CAMICO accounted for approximately 5% of AmerInst’s net premiums earned. We remain potentially liable for claims related to coverage through May 31, 2009.

 

VSC Payment

 

On July 22, 2009, the Company received a payment of $500,891 from Virginia Surety Company (“VSC”) in satisfaction of certain recoveries not previously remitted by VSC under retrocession contracts between the Company and VSC for the years 1989-1993. The $500,891 payment was recorded as a decrease in losses and loss adjustment expenses. The Company and VSC are in dispute with respect to over $500,000 in additional recoveries, fees and interest, which the Company currently expects to resolve via arbitration.

 

Attorneys’ Professional Liability Coverage

 

Effective January 1, 2003, we entered into a 15% quota share participation of the attorneys’ professional liability coverage provided by Professionals Direct Insurance Company (“PDIC”). This participation terminated on December 31, 2003. We remain potentially liable for claims related to this period of coverage.

 

5


Table of Contents

Third-party Managers and Service Providers

 

Cedar Management Limited provides the day-to-day services necessary for the administration of our business. Shareholder services are conducted by USA Risk Group of Vermont, Inc., an affiliate of Cedar Management Limited. Our agreement with Cedar Management Limited renewed for one year beginning January 1, 2010 and ending December 31, 2010. Mr. Stuart Grayston, our President, is a director and officer of Cedar Management Limited, and Mr. Thomas R. McMahon, our Vice President and Treasurer, is an officer, director and employee of Cedar Management Limited.

 

Mowery & Schoenfeld, LLC, an accounting firm affiliated with a former director and chairman emeritus, provides accounting functions to APSL pursuant to a letter of understanding dated January 21, 2010. The letter has an effective date of January 1, 2010 and terminates on December 31, 2010.

 

The Country Club Bank of Kansas City, Missouri, provides portfolio management of fixed-income securities and directs our investments pursuant to guidelines approved by us. Harris Associates L.P. and Aurora Investment Management, LLC provide discretionary investment advice with respect to our equity investments. We have retained Milliman USA, an independent casualty actuarial consulting firm, to render advice regarding actuarial matters.

 

Competition

 

Our main competition comes from brokers and agents that service accountants and attorneys; primarily AON Corporation, a large international corporation with 36,000 employees in over 120 countries which has a relationship with CNA Financial Corporation, and CAMICO Mutual Insurance Company, a California-based writer of accountants’ professional liability business.

 

Licensing and Regulation

 

The rates and terms of reinsurance agreements generally are not subject to regulation by any governmental authority. This is in contrast to direct insurance policies, the rates and terms of which are subject to regulation by state insurance departments. As a practical matter, however, the rates charged by primary insurers place a limit upon the rates that can be charged by reinsurers.

 

AmerInst, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, AMIC Ltd., is subject to regulation under the insurance laws of Bermuda, where AMIC Ltd. and AmerInst are domiciled.

 

APSL, a Delaware corporation, subsidiary of Mezco and a managing general underwriter responsible for offering professional liability solutions to professional service firms, continues to work closely with C&F to secure regulatory approval from various state insurance departments. As of March 18, 2010, APSL has received regulatory approval in 42 states and the District of Columbia.

 

Bermuda Regulation

 

AMIC Ltd., as a licensed Bermuda insurance company, is subject to regulation under The Insurance Act of 1978, as amended, and Related Regulations (collectively, the “Insurance Act”), which provide that no person shall conduct insurance business, including reinsurance, in or from Bermuda unless registered as an insurer under the Insurance Act by the Bermuda Monetary Authority (“BMA”). In deciding whether to grant registration, the BMA has discretion to act as it thinks fit in the public interest. The BMA is required by the Insurance Act to determine whether an applicant for registration is a fit and proper body to be engaged in insurance business and, in particular, whether it has, or has available to it, adequate knowledge and expertise. In connection with registration, the BMA may impose conditions relating to the writing of certain types of insurance.

 

6


Table of Contents

The Insurance Act requires, among other things, that Bermuda insurance companies meet and maintain certain standards of liquidity and solvency, file periodic reports in accordance with the Bermuda Statutory Accounting Rules, produce annual audited statutory financial statements and maintain a minimum level of statutory capital and surplus. In general, the regulation of insurers in Bermuda relies heavily upon the directors and managers of a Bermuda insurer, each of which must certify each year that the insurer meets the solvency, liquidity and capital requirements of the Insurance Act. Furthermore, the BMA is granted powers to supervise, investigate and intervene in the affairs of insurance companies. Significant aspects of the Bermuda insurance regulatory framework are described below.

 

An insurer’s registration may be canceled by the BMA on grounds specified in the Insurance Act, including the failure of the insurer to comply with the obligations of the Insurance Act or if, in the opinion of the BMA, the insurer has not been carrying on business in accordance with sound insurance principles.

 

Every registered insurer must appoint an independent auditor approved by the BMA. That auditor must annually audit and report on the statutory financial statements and the statutory financial return of the insurer, both of which are required to be filed annually with the BMA. The approved auditor may be the same person or firm that audits the insurer’s financial statements and reports for presentation to its shareholders.

 

The Insurance Act provides that the statutory assets of an insurer must exceed its statutory liabilities by an amount greater than the prescribed minimum solvency margin. Pursuant to the Insurance Act, AMIC Ltd. is registered as a Class 3A insurer and, as such: (i) is required to maintain a minimum solvency margin equal to the greatest of: (x) $1,000,000, (y) 20% of net premiums written in its current financial year up to $6,000,000 plus 15% of net premiums written in its current financial year over $6,000,000, or (z) 15% of loss reserves; (ii) is required to file annually with the BMA a statutory financial return together with a copy of its statutory financial statements which includes a report of the independent auditor concerning its statutory financial statements, a declaration of the statutory ratios, and the related solvency certificate, and an opinion of a loss reserve specialist in respect of its loss and loss expense provisions, all within four months following the end of the relevant financial year; (iii) is prohibited from declaring or paying any dividends during any financial year if it is in breach of its minimum solvency margin or minimum liquidity ratio or if the declaration or payment of such dividends would cause it to fail to meet such margin or ratio (if it fails to meet its minimum solvency margin or minimum liquidity ratio on the last day of any financial year, it will be prohibited, without the approval of the BMA, from declaring or paying any dividends during the next financial year); (iv) is prohibited, without the approval of the BMA, from reducing by 15% or more its total statutory capital, as set out in its previous year’s financial statements; and (v) if it appears to the BMA that there is a risk of an insurance company becoming insolvent or that it is in breach of the Insurance Act or any conditions imposed upon its registration, the BMA may, in addition to the restrictions specified above, direct it not to declare or pay any dividends or any other distributions or may restrict it from making such payments to such extent as the BMA may think fit.

 

The Insurance Act also provides a minimum liquidity ratio for general business. An insurer engaged in general business is required to maintain the value of its relevant assets at not less than 75% of the amount of its relevant liabilities. Relevant assets include cash and time deposits, quoted investments, unquoted bonds and debentures, first liens on real estate, investment income due and accrued, accounts and premiums receivable and reinsurance balances receivable. There are certain categories of assets which, unless specifically permitted by the BMA, do not automatically qualify such as advances to affiliates, real estate and collateral loans. The relevant liabilities are total general business insurance reserves and total other liabilities less deferred income tax and sundry liabilities (by interpretation, those not specifically defined). Based upon the foregoing, the investment by AMIC Ltd. in an investment subsidiary, AmerInst Investment Company, Ltd. (“Investco”), requires the specific approval of the BMA for classification as a relevant asset, which we have received up to an amount sufficient to meet the minimum liquidity ratio.

 

The BMA may appoint an inspector with extensive powers to investigate the affairs of an insurer if the BMA believes that an investigation is required in the interest of the insurer’s policyholders or persons who may

 

7


Table of Contents

become policyholders. In order to verify or supplement information otherwise provided to him, the BMA may direct an insurer to produce documents or information in relation to matters connected with the insurer’s business.

 

If it appears to the BMA that there is a risk of an insurer becoming insolvent, or if the insurer is in breach of the Insurance Act or the regulations or of any condition imposed on its registration as an insurer, the BMA may direct the insurer in certain respects, including not to take on any new insurance business; not to vary any insurance contract if the effect would be to increase the insurer’s liabilities; not to make certain investments; to realize certain investments; to maintain in, or transfer to and to keep in the custody of, a specified bank, certain assets; not to declare or pay any dividends or other distributions or to restrict the making of such payments; and/or to limit its premiums.

 

As a Bermuda insurer, we are required to maintain a principal office in Bermuda and to appoint and maintain a Principal Representative in Bermuda. For the purpose of the Insurance Act, our principal office is c/o Cedar Management Limited, 25 Church Street, Continental Building, P.O. Box HM 1601, Hamilton HMGX, Bermuda, which is our Principal Representative in Bermuda. An insurer may only terminate the appointment of its Principal Representative with a reason acceptable to the BMA, and the principal representative may not cease to act as such, unless the BMA is given 21 days’ notice in writing of the intention to do so. It is the duty of the Principal Representative, upon reaching the view that there is a likelihood of the insurer for which he acts becoming insolvent or it coming to his knowledge, or his having reason to believe, that an “event” has occurred, to provide verbal notification immediately, and make a report in writing to the BMA setting out all the particulars of the case that are available to him within 14 days. Examples of such an “event” include failure by the insurer to comply substantially with a condition imposed upon the insurer by the BMA relating to a solvency margin or liquidity or other ratio.

 

Except for business related to APSL, our business is conducted from offices in Hamilton, Bermuda. We manage our investments, directly and through AMIC Ltd., through independent investment advisors in the U.S. or other investment markets as needed and appropriate. We do not operate as an investment manager or as a broker dealer requiring registration under investment advisory or securities broker regulations in the U.S., Bermuda or otherwise. The directors and officers of AMIC Ltd. negotiate reinsurance treaties for acceptance in Bermuda. Among other matters, the following business functions are conducted from our Bermuda offices: (i) communications with our shareholders, including financial reports; (ii) communications with the general public of a nature other than advertising; (iii) solicitation of the sale by us or any of our subsidiaries of shares in any of such entities; (iv) accepting subscriptions of new shareholders of the Company; (v) maintenance of principal corporate records and original books of account; (vi) audit of original books of account; (vii) disbursement of funds in payment of dividends, claims, legal fees, accounting fees, and officers’ and directors’ fees; (viii) arrangement for and conduct of meetings of our shareholders and directors and shareholders and directors of our subsidiaries; and (ix) execution of repurchases of our shares and shares of our subsidiaries. We do not maintain an office or place of business in the United States.

 

8


Table of Contents

AMIC Ltd.’s ability to pay dividends to AmerInst is subject to the provisions of the Bermuda insurance and companies laws. Under the Companies Act, AMIC Ltd. would be prohibited from declaring or paying a dividend at December 31, 2009 if such payment would reduce the realizable value of its assets to an amount less than the aggregate value of its liabilities, issued share capital, and share premium accounts. As at December 31, 2009, approximately $30 million was available for the payment of dividends to shareholders. In addition, AMIC Ltd. must be able to pay its liabilities as they fall due after the payment of a dividend. Our ability to pay dividends to common shareholders and to pay our operating expenses is dependent on cash dividends from our subsidiaries. The payment of such dividends by AMIC Ltd., including its subsidiary Investco, to us is also limited under Bermuda law by the Insurance Act and Related Regulations which require that AMIC Ltd. maintain minimum levels of solvency and liquidity. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 these requirements have been met as follows:

 

     Statutory
Capital & Surplus
   Relevant Assets
     Minimum    Actual    Minimum    Actual

December 31, 2009

   $ 1,000,000    $ 31,177,595    $ 9,445,328    $ 9,445,328

December 31, 2008

   $ 3,662,424    $ 24,632,564    $ 29,227,476    $ 30,251,246

 

The December 31, 2008 Actual Relevant Assets position has been restated from $66,540,279 to $30,251,246 to properly reflect the Actual Relevant Assets position approved by the BMA in that year.

 

AMIC Ltd. writes more than 50% unrelated business and consequently, in accordance with the requirements of the Insurance Amendment Act 2008, was reclassified as a Class 3A reinsurer effective January 1, 2009. The reclassification will not result in any changes in statutory requirements.

 

Customers

 

Our only sources of income, other than our investment portfolio, are our Agency Agreement and Reinsurance Agreement. Without such agreements, we believe current levels of investment income would provide enough revenue to continue operations while the Company evaluated other reinsurance and insurance opportunities.

 

Employees

 

At December 31, 2009, APSL had three employees, all of which were full-time.

 

Mowery & Schoenfeld, LLC, an accounting firm affiliated with a former director and chairman emeritus, provides accounting functions to APSL pursuant to a letter of understanding dated January 21, 2010. The letter has an effective date of January 1, 2010 and terminates on December 31, 2010.

 

Other operating activities, as well as certain management functions, are performed by Cedar Management Limited under the direction of our board of directors pursuant to a contract. This contract may be terminated by either party on not more than 90 and not less than 60 days prior written notice.

 

Loss Reserves

 

Our loss reserves, changes in aggregate reserves for the last two years, and loss reserve development as of the end of each of the last ten years, are discussed in Item 7 of this Report, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Report, and Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Developing Business

 

AmerInst has filed an application for a U.S. patent on a unique financing concept that it has developed to securitize insurance and reinsurance risk, involving property, casualty, life and health. Such securitization would

 

9


Table of Contents

be by equity and debt financing of Bermuda special purpose companies licensed as reinsurers. It is AmerInst’s intention to grant patent licenses to the special purpose companies and investment banking organizations which will market the securities. In addition to the license royalties, AmerInst would manage the special purpose companies for a fee and at its option could invest in them as well. However, AmerInst may not be issued a patent, and, even if so, may not be able to license such patent.

 

AmerInst has entered into confidentiality agreements with several investment banking organizations.

 

In addition to the patent application, AmerInst has obtained a trademark under which the concept will be marketed.

 

AmerInst has three operating segments: 1) reinsurance activity, 2) RINITS™, its insurance financing product, which is in the marketing phase of development, and 3) insurance activity under the Agency Agreement. See Note 12, Segment Information, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained in Item 12 of this annual report on Form 10-K for financial information concerning these segments.

 

Available Information

 

We file annual, quarterly, and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”). You may read any document we file with the Commission at the Commission’s public reference room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Please call the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the public reference room. The Commission maintains an internet site that contains annual, quarterly, and current reports, proxy and information statements and other information that issuers (including AmerInst) file electronically with the Commission. The Commission’s internet site is www.sec.gov.

 

Our internet site is www.amerinst.bm. We make available free of charge through our internet site our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Commission. You will need to have on your computer the Adobe Acrobat Reader® software to view these documents, which are in PDF format. If you do not have Adobe Acrobat Reader, a link to Adobe’s internet site, from which you can download the software, is provided. We also make available, through our internet site, via links to the Commission’s internet site, statements of beneficial ownership of our equity securities filed by our directors, officers, 10% or greater shareholders and others under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act. In addition, we post on www.amerinst.bm our Memorandum of Association, our Bye-Laws, our Statement of Share Ownership Policy, Charters for our Audit Committee and Governance and Nominations Committee, as well as our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. You can request a copy of these documents, excluding exhibits, at no cost, by writing or telephoning us c/o Cedar Management Limited, 25 Church Street, Continental Building, P.O. Box HM 1601 Hamilton, Bermuda HMGX, Attention: Investor Relations (441) 296-3973. The information on our internet site is not incorporated by reference into this report.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 

You should consider carefully the following risk factors before deciding whether to invest in our common stock. Our business, including our operating results and financial condition, could be harmed by any of these risks. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially and adversely affect our business. The value of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks, and you may lose all or part of your investment. In assessing these risks you should also refer to the other information contained in our filings with the SEC, including our financial statements and related notes.

 

10


Table of Contents

We may not be able to generate material revenue or profit under our new agency and reinsurance agreements.

 

On January 5, 2009, AMIC Ltd., our wholly-owned subsidiary, received written notice from CNA that CNA did not intend to renew its reinsurance agreement with us regarding the AICPA Plan. In 2008, our business relationship with CNA accounted for over 95% of our net premiums earned. On May 15, 2009, we completed our commutation negotiations and executed the Commutation and Release Agreement with CNA whereby, effective January 1, 2009, in exchange for a payment of a portion of the reserves which we had previously set aside, CNA assumed responsibility for prior years’ undetermined and unpaid liabilities.

 

Effective September 25, 2009, APSL, a wholly-owned subsidiary of AmerInst Mezco, Ltd. which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AmerInst, entered into the Agency Agreement with C&F pursuant to which C&F appointed APSL as its exclusive agent for the purposes of soliciting, underwriting, quoting, binding, issuing, cancelling, non-renewing and endorsing accountants’ professional liability and lawyers’ professional liability insurance coverage within the 50 states of the United States and the District of Columbia. Also on September 25, 2009, AMIC Ltd. entered into the reinsurance agreement with C&F pursuant to which C&F agrees to cede and AMIC Ltd. agrees to accept as reinsurance a fifty percent (50%) quota share of C&F’s liability under insurance written by APSL on behalf of C&F and classified by C&F as accountants’ professional liability and lawyers’ professional liability. No underwriting activity occurred through December 31, 2009 under either the Agency Agreement or Reinsurance Agreement.

 

Because we have only recently entered into the Agency Agreement and Reinsurance Agreement and our ability to generate revenue under either agreement is unproven, neither agreement may result in material revenue or profit. Even if we are able to generate material revenue and or profit from these agreements, we may not be able to do so for a significant period of time.

 

If our agreements with C&F are terminated or C&F chooses not to renew them, our ability to generate revenue would be adversely affected.

 

We anticipate that the great majority of our revenue in the near future will be derived from (i) the commissions earned by APSL, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mezco which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AmerInst, through the Agency Agreement with C&F and (ii) the reinsurance activity under the Reinsurance Agreement between AMIC Ltd., our wholly-owned subsidiary, and C&F. Therefore if C&F should terminate or choose not to renew one or both of those agreements or should renew them on terms less favorable to us, our ability to generate revenue may be adversely affected.

 

We participate in a potentially unprofitable, unstable market.

 

Accountants’ professional liability insurance is a volatile risk with fluctuations both in the frequency and severity of claims, particularly severity. This is aggravated by the casualty insurance cycle, which over a period of years varies from a hard market with high or increasing premiums charged for risk, to a soft market with low or decreasing premiums being charged. The interaction of volatility and insurance cycle variation results in a high degree of unpredictability of underwriting results from year to year. Because as a reinsurer, we will be directly influenced by the premium competition in the primary market, and as a quota share reinsurer, we will be directly dependent on the underwriting results of our cedants, therefore our revenue could be adversely affected by factors beyond our control.

 

Our industry is highly competitive and we may not be able to compete successfully in the future.

 

Our industry is highly competitive and subject to pricing cycles that can be pronounced. We compete solely in the United States reinsurance and insurance markets. Some of our competitors have greater financial resources than we do and have established long term and continuing business relationships throughout the industry, which can be a significant competitive advantage. If we are unable to successfully compete against these companies our profitability could be adversely affected.

 

11


Table of Contents

Our investment return may not be sufficient to offset underwriting losses.

 

Our investment income is subject to variation due to fluctuations of market interest rates on our fixed income portfolio, and fluctuations of stock prices in our equity portfolio. If such investment income is not sufficient to offset potential underwriting losses or our capital is not sufficient to absorb adverse underwriting and/or investment results, our profitability would be adversely affected.

 

Our inability to retain senior executives and other key personal could adversely affect our business.

 

The successful implementation of our new business plan is dependent upon our ability to retain APSL senior executives and other qualified employees. In November 2009, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Kyle Nieman, President and CEO of APSL. Mr. Nieman has more than 25 years of insurance industry experience. In addition, a number of AmerInst’s operating activities as well as certain management functions are performed by outside parties. If such outside parties and our key employees were not to renew their relationship with us, or only upon terms that were not acceptable to us, then our business could be harmed.

 

Your ownership of our shares does not guarantee insurance coverage.

 

The ownership of our common shares by an accounting firm or individual practitioner will not guarantee that such firm or individual will thereafter be able to obtain professional liability insurance under other policies reinsured by AMIC Ltd., or that such insurance will be competitively priced.

 

There is no market for our shares, which may be subject to restrictions on transfer.

 

There is currently no market for our common shares and it is unlikely that a market will develop. Our common shares are not listed on any stock exchange or automated quotation system. Under our Bye-Laws, our Board of Directors has the authority to prohibit all transfers of shares. Further, because an integral part of the value of our common shares is our commitment to utilize the insurance capacity of AMIC Ltd. for the benefit of our shareholders it is unlikely that any individual or entity other than sole practitioners and accounting firms would be interested in purchasing our common shares.

 

Reinsurance may not be available to us.

 

In order to limit the effect of large and multiple losses upon our financial condition, AMIC Ltd. may, in the future, seek reinsurance for its own account. From time to time, market conditions have limited the availability of reinsurance, and in some cases have prevented insurers and reinsurers from obtaining the types and amounts of reinsurance which they consider adequate for their business needs. If AMIC Ltd. is unable to obtain the desired amounts of reinsurance, or, if it is able to obtain such reinsurance only on terms not sufficiently favorable to operate profitably, we could be adversely affected.

 

Difficult conditions in the economy generally may materially adversely affect our business and results of operations, and these conditions may not improve in the near future.

 

Current market conditions and the instability in the global credit markets present additional risks and uncertainties for our business. Depending on market conditions going forward, we could incur substantial additional realized and unrealized losses in future periods, which could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition. The recent market volatility may also make it more difficult to value certain of our securities if trading becomes less frequent. As such, valuations may include assumptions or estimates that may have significant period-to-period changes that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

 

12


Table of Contents

We may be impacted by claims relating to the recent financial market turmoil.

 

We reinsure professional liability insurance for certified public accountants. The financial institutions and financial services segment has been particularly impacted by the recent financial market turmoil. As a result, accountants that service this industry may be subject to additional claims. This may give rise to increased litigation, including class action suits, which may involve clients of parties for which we provide reinsurance. To the extent we have claims relating to these events, it could cause substantial volatility in our financial results and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Actual claims may exceed our reserves for losses and loss expenses.

 

Our success depends on our ability to accurately assess the risks associated with the businesses that we reinsure. We establish loss reserves to cover our estimated liability for the payment of all losses and loss expenses incurred with respect to the policies we write. Loss reserves do not represent an exact calculation of liability. Rather, loss reserves are estimates of what we expect the ultimate resolution and administration of claims will cost. These estimates are based on actuarial and statistical projections and on our assessment of currently available data, as well as estimates of future trends in claims severity and frequency, judicial theories of liability and other factors. Loss reserve estimates are refined as experience develops and claims are reported and resolved. Establishing an appropriate level of loss reserves is an inherently uncertain process. It is therefore possible that our reserves at any given time will prove to be inadequate.

 

We have estimated our net losses based on actuarial analysis of claims information. Actual losses may vary from those estimated and will be adjusted in the period in which further information becomes available. To the extent we determine that actual losses or loss expenses exceed our expectations and reserves reflected in our financial statements, we will be required to increase our reserves to reflect our changed expectations. This could cause a material increase in our liabilities and a reduction in our profitability, including operating losses and a reduction of capital.

 

Legislative and regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

We and our subsidiaries are required to comply with a wide variety of laws and regulations applicable to insurance or reinsurance companies. The insurance and regulatory environment, in particular for offshore insurance and reinsurance companies, has become subject to increased scrutiny in many jurisdictions, including the United States, and various states within the United States. In the past, there have been Congressional and other initiatives in the United States regarding increased supervision and regulation of the insurance industry. It is not possible to predict the future impact of changes in laws and regulations on our operations. The cost of complying with any new legal requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Our Bermuda insurance subsidiary, AMIC Ltd., is registered as a Class 3A insurer and is subject to regulation and supervision in Bermuda. The applicable Bermuda statutes and regulations generally are designed to protect insureds and ceding insurance companies rather than shareholders or noteholders. Among other things, those statutes and regulations require AMIC Ltd. to:

 

   

meet and maintain certain standards of liquidity and solvency,

 

   

file periodic reports in accordance with the Bermuda Statutory Accounting Rules,

 

   

produce annual audited statutory financial statements,

 

   

maintain a minimum level of statutory capital and surplus, and

 

   

comply with restrictions on payments of dividends and reductions of capital.

 

Our Bermuda entities could become subject to regulation or taxation in the United States.

 

None of our Bermuda entities is licensed or admitted as an insurer, nor accredited as a reinsurer, in any jurisdiction in the United States. However, we anticipate that in the near future the majority of our revenue will

 

13


Table of Contents

be derived from (i) commissions earned by APSL, our Delaware subsidiary, through the Agency Agreement with C&F and (ii) the Reinsurance Agreement by AMIC Ltd. with C&F which represent a group of companies domiciled primarily in the United States. We conduct our insurance business through offices in Bermuda and do not maintain an office, and our personnel do not solicit insurance business, resolve claims or conduct other insurance business, in the United States. While we do not believe we are in violation of insurance laws of any jurisdiction in the United States, we cannot be certain that inquiries or challenges to our insurance and reinsurance activities will not be raised in the future. It is possible that, if we were to become subject to any laws of this type at any time in the future, we would not be in compliance with the requirements of those laws.

 

We believe that our non-U.S. companies have operated and will operate their respective businesses in a manner that will not cause them to be subject to U.S. tax (other than U.S. federal excise tax on insurance and reinsurance premiums and withholding tax on specified investment income from U.S. sources) on the basis that none of them are engaged in a U.S. trade or business. However, there are no definitive standards under current law as to those activities that constitute a U.S. trade or business and the determination of whether a non-U.S. company is engaged in a U.S. trade or business is inherently factual. Therefore, it is possible that the U.S. Internal Revenue Service might contend that one or more of our non-U.S. companies is engaged in a U.S. trade or business. If AMIC, Ltd. or any of our other non-U.S. companies is engaged in a U.S. trade or business and does not qualify for benefits under the applicable income tax treaty, such company may be subject to (i) U.S. federal income taxation at regular corporate rates on its premium income from U.S. sources and investment income that is effectively connected with its U.S. trade or business, and (ii) a U.S. federal branch profits tax at the rate of 30% on the earnings and profits attributable to such income. All of the premium income from U.S. sources and a significant portion of such company’s investment income may be subject to U.S. federal income and branch profits taxes.

 

If AMIC Ltd. or any of our other non-U.S. companies is engaged in a U.S. trade or business and qualifies for benefits under the United States-Bermuda tax treaty, U.S. federal income taxation of such subsidiary will depend on whether (i) it maintains a U.S. permanent establishment and (ii) the relief from taxation under the treaty generally applies to non-premium income. We believe that AMIC, Ltd. has operated and will continue to operate its business in a manner that will not cause it to maintain a U.S. permanent establishment. However, the determination of whether an insurance company maintains a U.S. permanent establishment is inherently factual. Therefore, it is possible that the U.S. Internal Revenue Service might successfully assert that any of our Bermuda entities maintains a U.S. permanent establishment. In such case, such Bermuda entity may be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates and branch profit tax. Furthermore, although the provisions of the treaty clearly apply to premium income, it is uncertain whether they generally apply to other income of a Bermuda insurance company as well.

 

We believe U.S. federal income tax, if imposed, would be based on effectively connected or attributable income of a non-U.S. company computed in a manner generally analogous to that applied to the income of a U.S. corporation, except that all deductions and credits claimed by a non-U.S. company in a taxable year can be disallowed if the company does not file a U.S. federal income tax return for such year. Penalties may be assessed for failure to file such return. If any of our non-U.S. companies is subject to such U.S. federal taxation, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

 

As a shareholder of our company, you may have greater difficulties in protecting your interests than as a shareholder of a U.S. corporation.

 

The Companies Act, which applies to us and our Bermuda subsidiaries, differs in material respects from laws generally applicable to U.S. corporations and their shareholders. These differences may result in your having greater difficulties in protecting your interests as a shareholder of our company than you would have as a shareholder of a U.S. corporation. This affects, among other things, the circumstances under which transactions involving an interested director are voidable, whether an interested director can be held accountable for any benefit realized in a transaction with the Company, what approvals are required for business combinations by the

 

14


Table of Contents

Company with a large shareholder or a wholly-owned subsidiary, what rights you may have as a shareholder to enforce specified provisions of the Companies Act or our Bye-laws, and the circumstances under which we may indemnify our directors and officers.

 

A downgrade in our A.M. Best rating or that of C&F could impair our ability to sell insurance policies or those of C&F.

 

Our new business plan met A. M. Best’s higher capitalization requirements, which mandate a more conservative level of risk based capital. A. M. Best is the most widely recognized insurance company rating agency. In December 2009, A. M. Best affirmed AmerInst’s financial strength rating of A- (Excellent) and issuer credit rating of “a-.” A. M. Best also affirmed that the outlook assigned to both ratings is stable.

 

Some policyholders are required to obtain insurance coverage from insurance companies that have an “A-” (Excellent) rating or higher from A.M. Best. Additionally, many producers are prohibited from placing insurance or reinsurance with companies that are rated below “A-” (Excellent) by A.M. Best. A.M. Best assigns ratings that represent an independent opinion of a company’s ability to meet its obligations to policyholders that is of concern primarily to policyholders, brokers and agents, and its rating and outlook should not be considered an investment recommendation. Because A.M. Best continually monitors companies with regard to their ratings, our ratings could change at any time, and any downgrade of our current rating may impair our ability to sell insurance policies and, ultimately, our financial condition and operating results.

 

If A.M. Best requires us to increase our capital in order to maintain our rating and we are unable to raise the required amount of capital to be contributed to our subsidiaries, A.M. Best may downgrade our rating.

 

Similarly, if C&F’s A. M. Best’s rating should ever be reduced, this could adversely affect our ability to solicit, underwrite, quote, bind, issue or endorse accountants’ professional liability and lawyers’ professional liability insurance coverage under our Agency Agreement with C&F or to reinsure under the Reinsurance Agreement a 50% quota share of C&F’s liability under insurance written by APSL on behalf of C&F and classified by C&F as accountants’ professional liability and lawyers’ professional liability.

 

Anti-takeover provisions could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us.

 

Investco, our subsidiary, currently owns approximately 25.9% of our outstanding shares of common stock and has the ability to purchase additional shares. Shares owned by Investco remain outstanding and can be voted by Investco at our direction, which may hinder or prohibit a change in control transaction not approved by us.

 

In addition, because our Statement of Share Ownership Policy limits each shareholder other than Investco to owning no more than 20,000 shares of our common stock and our Bye-laws permit our board of directors to implement provisions requiring board approval of all transfers of common stock, it may be difficult for any individual or entity to obtain voting control of AmerInst.

 

Finally, our Bye-laws provide for a classified board of directors which could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or management.

 

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

 

None.

 

15


Table of Contents

Item 2. Properties

 

Lease commitments

 

APSL leases office space in Lisle, Illinois under a non cancellable lease agreement. The lease is renewable at the option of the lessee under certain conditions. Minimum lease payments, subsequent to December 31, 2009, are as follows:

 

2010

   $ 39,544

2011

     54,043

2012

     55,801

2013

     57,558

2014

     14,150
      
   $ 221,096
      

 

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

 

The Company is not a party to any material legal proceedings.

 

Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)

 

PART II

 

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

There is no established public trading market for our common shares. Although our Bye-Laws provide that all transfers of our common shares must be approved by our Board of Directors or a committee of the Board, on December 12, 2008, the Board of Directors amended and restated AmerInst’s Statement of Share Ownership Policy and removed all Board-imposed restrictions on the beneficial ownership and transfer of AmerInst’s common shares except that the number of common shares of AmerInst that may be beneficially owned (as defined in Rules 16a-1 and 13d-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) by any shareholder shall be limited to 20,000 shares.

 

Notwithstanding the absence of a public market for our common shares, we have a policy of having Investco, which holds our investment portfolio, purchase shares owned by our shareholders who have retired from the practice of public accounting or have died. We are currently prepared to repurchase those shares at a price equal to the greater of the last year-end net book value per share or $39.99 per share.

 

The Bermuda Monetary Authority has authorized Investco to purchase the Company’s common shares from shareholders who have died or retired from the practice of public accounting and also on a negotiated basis. Through March 1, 2010, Investco had purchased 93,874 common shares from shareholders who had died or retired for a total purchase price of $2,019,194. From time to time, Investco has also purchased common shares in privately negotiated transactions. Through that date, Investco had purchased an additional 66,615 common shares in such privately negotiated transactions for a total purchase price of $875,111.

 

16


Table of Contents

The following table shows information relating to the purchase of shares from shareholders who have died or retired from the practice of accounting as described above during the three month period ended December 31, 2009.

 

     Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
   Average
Price Paid
Per Share
   Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Plans or Program
   Maximum
Number
of Shares
That May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plans or Program

October 2009

   1,209    $ 27.85    1,209    N/A

November 2009

   —        —      —      N/A

December 2009

   —        —      —      N/A

Total

   1,209    $ 27.85    1,209    N/A

 

As of March 1, 2010, there were 1,894 holders of record of our common shares. Our Board of Directors had adopted a dividend policy to pay quarterly dividends subject to legally available funds and Board approval. Beginning in September 2005, our Board of Directors amended the dividend policy to pay semi-annual dividends of $0.47 per share with payments in March and September. During 2009, the dividend amount paid was reduced by $33,862, which represented a write back of uncashed dividends issued prior to 2003 to shareholders that we have been unable to locate. During 2008, the dividend amount paid was reduced by $29,080, which represented a write back of uncashed dividends issued prior to 2001 to shareholders that we have been unable to locate. During 2009 and 2008, we paid ordinary cash dividends of $662,249 and $673,514, respectively, net of the write back, representing two semi-annual payments of $0.47 per share. The declaration of dividends by our Board of Directors is dependent upon our capacity to insure or reinsure business, profitability, financial condition, and other factors which the Board of Directors may deem appropriate. Under Bermuda law, AMIC Ltd. is prohibited from declaring or paying any dividend to AmerInst if such payment would reduce the net realizable value of its assets to an amount less than the aggregate value of its liabilities, issued share capital and share premium accounts. In addition, AMIC Ltd. must be able to pay its liabilities as they fall due after the payment of a dividend.

 

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) provides supplemental information, which sets forth the major factors that have affected our financial condition and results of operation and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this Form 10-K. The MD&A is divided into subsections entitled “Business Overview,” “Critical Accounting Policies,” “Results of Operations,” “Liquidity and Capital Resources” and “Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses.”

 

Certain statements contained in this Form 10-K, including this MD&A section, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and contain information relating to us that is based on the beliefs of our management as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, our management. The words “anticipate,” “expect,” “believe” and similar expressions as they relate to us or our management are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

 

All forward-looking statements, by their nature, are subject to risks and uncertainties. Our actual future results may differ materially from those set forth in our forward-looking statements. Please see the Introductory Note and Item 1A “Risk Factors” of this Form 10-K for a discussion of factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. However, the risk factors listed in Item 1A “Risk Factors” or discussed in this Form 10-K should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in

 

17


Table of Contents

conjunction with other cautionary statements that are included herein. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our management’s analysis only as of the date they are made. We undertake no obligation to release publicly the results of any future revisions we may make to forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

 

The following discussion addresses our financial condition and results of operations for the periods and as of the dates indicated.

 

Business Overview

 

We are an insurance holding company based in Bermuda owned primarily by accounting firms, persons associated with accounting firms, and individual CPA practitioners. We were formed in response to concerns about the pricing and availability of accountants’ professional liability insurance in a difficult or “hard” market. Our mission is to be a Company that provides availability of insurance for the Certified Public Accountant (“CPA”) profession, and that engages in investment activities. Through APSL, a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mezco which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AmerInst, we act as the exclusive agent for C&F for the purposes of soliciting, underwriting, quoting, binding, issuing, cancelling, non-renewing and endorsing accountants’ professional liability and lawyers’ professional liability insurance coverage within the 50 states of the United States and the District of Columbia. We conduct our reinsurance business through AMIC Ltd., our wholly-owned subsidiary, which is a registered insurer in Bermuda. We are prepared, subject to obtaining the required licenses and registrations, to act as a direct issuer of accountants’ professional liability insurance policies. Our investment portfolio is held in and managed by Investco, which is a subsidiary of AMIC Ltd.

 

AmerInst has three operating segments: 1) reinsurance activity, 2) RINITS™, its insurance financing product, which is in the marketing phase of development, and 3) insurance activity under the Agency Agreement. See Note 12, Segment Information, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained in Item 12 of this annual report on Form 10-K for financial information concerning these segments.

 

The reinsurance segment had revenues of $6,439,547 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and $5,292,131 for the year ended December 31, 2008. Total losses and expenses for this segment were $(238,891) for the year ended December 31, 2009 and $5,458,169 for the year ended December 31, 2008. This resulted in segment income of $6,678,438 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and segment loss of $166,038 for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

The RINITS™ segment offers a mechanism to securitize insurance and reinsurance risk, involving property, casualty, life and health lines of insurance. This segment as of December 31, 2009 had generated no revenue. Operating and management expenses in the marketing phase of development were $155,813 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and $467,745 for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

The insurance segment offers accountants’ professional liability and lawyers’ professional liability insurance coverage. This segment as of December 31, 2009 had generated no revenue. Operating and management expenses were $771,088 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and no expenses were incurred for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

AmerInst has filed an application for a U.S. patent on a unique financing concept that it has developed to securitize insurance and reinsurance risk, involving property, casualty, life and health. Such securitization would be by equity and debt financing of Bermuda special purpose companies licensed as reinsurers. It is AmerInst’s intention to grant patent licenses to the special purpose companies and investment banking organizations which will market the securities. In addition to the license royalties, AmerInst would manage the special purpose companies for a fee, and at its option could invest in them as well. However, AmerInst may not be issued a patent, and even if so, may not be able to license such patent.

 

18


Table of Contents

AmerInst has entered into confidentiality agreements with several investment banking organizations.

 

In addition to the patent application, AmerInst has obtained a trademark under which the concept will be marketed.

 

Our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are discussed below.

 

We operate our business with no long-term debt, no capital lease obligations, no purchase obligations, and no off-balance sheet arrangements required to be disclosed under applicable rules of the SEC. AmerInst’s access to operating cash flows of its subsidiaries is from the payment of dividends.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The major estimates reflected in the Company’s financial statements include but are not limited to the liability for loss and loss adjustment expenses and other than temporary impairment of investments.

 

Unpaid Losses and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves

 

The amount that we record as our liability for loss and loss adjustment expenses is a major determinant of net income each year. As discussed in more detail below under the heading “Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses,” the amount that we reserve is based on actuarial estimates which were prepared as of September 30 and December 31, 2009 and June 30 and December 31, 2008. Based on data received from the ceding companies (the insurance companies whose policies we reinsure) our independent actuary produces a range of estimates with a “low,” “central” and “high” estimate of the loss and loss adjustment expenses. As at December 31, 2009, the range of actuarially determined liability for loss and loss adjustment expense reserves was as follows: the low estimate was $1.2 million, the high estimate was $1.5 million, and the central estimate was $1.3 million. We selected reserves of $1,510,478 as of December 31, 2009, which is at the high end of the range. Due to our concerns about the severity and volatility of the type of business we reinsure and the length of time that it takes for claims to be reported and ultimately settled, our management’s policy has been to reserve conservatively at the higher end of the actuarial estimates.

 

Other than Temporary Impairment of Investments

 

Declines in the fair value of investments below cost are evaluated for other than temporary impairment losses. The evaluation for other than temporary impairment losses is a quantitative and qualitative process which is subject to risks and uncertainties in the determination of whether declines in the fair value of investments are other than temporary. The risks and uncertainties include the Company’s intent and ability to hold the security, changes in general economic conditions, the issuer’s financial condition or near term recovery prospects, and the effects of changes in interest rates. AmerInst’s accounting policy requires that a decline in the value of a security below its cost basis be assessed to determine if the decline is other than temporary. If so, the security is deemed to be impaired and a charge is recorded in net realized losses equal to the difference between the fair value and the cost basis of the security. The fair value of the impaired investment becomes its new cost basis.

 

19


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

 

We recorded a net income of $5,751,537 in 2009, compared to net loss of $633,783 in 2008.

 

The net income recorded for the year ended December 31, 2009 is mainly attributable to the reduction of approximately $5,400,000 in loss and loss adjustment expenses in recognition of the positive development recorded as a result of updating the estimated liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses on the finalization of the Commutation Agreement with CNA, and the recovery from VSC, offset by a reduction in net premiums, as discussed below in further detail.

 

Net realized gain/(loss) on investments includes other than temporary impairment charges of $847,889 in 2009 and $5,271,859 in 2008.

 

Net premiums earned decreased by 61.3% in 2009 to $3,235,446 from $8,367,209 in 2008. This decrease is due to the 2009 Reinsurance Treaties being rescinded and terminated retroactive to their inception and the decision not to renew the CAMICO contract.

 

Net premiums written in 2009 were $(383,926), a decrease of $8,777,631 from $8,393,705 in 2008. The decrease in net premiums written was due to the 2009 Reinsurance Treaties being rescinded and terminated retroactive to their inception and the decision not to renew the CAMICO contract. We continue to look for ways in which it may be advantageous to expand our business to include the reinsurance of lines of coverage other than accountants’ professional liability.

 

Net investment income includes amounts earned on the Company’s investment portfolio and cash equivalents, and dividends on equity investments, net of investment expenses. Net investment income decreased by $716,661, or 48.3%, in 2009 to $766,512 from $1,483,173 in 2008. The decline in net investment income is due to a lower amount available for investment in 2009 compared to 2008.

 

Net realized gain increased by $6,995,840 in 2009 to $2,437,589 from a net realized loss of $4,558,251 in 2008. The significant increase in realized gains recorded in 2009 was primarily related to realized gains on the sale of equity securities and a reduction in the recorded impairment charges in 2009 compared to 2008.

 

Invested assets, including investments, cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents, decreased by $15,883,334 or 33.6%, to $31,355,538 in 2009 compared to $47,238,872 in 2008. The decrease was primarily due to the sale of investments from the Company’s fixed income investment portfolio to fund the payment to CNA of $20,550,000 as required by the Commutation Agreement. Investment yield of net investment income and net realized gains and losses in 2009 as of December 31 was 8.2% as compared to (5.9%) in 2008, due to the realized gains on sales of equity securities and a reduction in the recorded impairment charges in 2009 compared to 2008, and compared to the realized loss on investments in 2008. The investment yield of net investment income was 2.0% in 2009 and 2.9% in 2008.

 

Unrealized gain on investments was $6,611,053 at December 31, 2009 compared to $2,731,362 at December 31, 2008. We consider our entire investment portfolio to be available for sale and accordingly all investments are reported at fair value, with changes in net unrealized gains and losses reflected as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income. The 142.0% increase in unrealized gain on investments was due primarily to an improvement in the value of the Company’s equity portfolio. Declines in the fair value of investments below cost are evaluated for other than temporary impairment losses. The evaluation for other than temporary impairment losses is a quantitative and qualitative process which is subject to risks and uncertainties in the determination of whether declines in the fair value of investments are other than temporary. The risks and uncertainties include changes in general economic conditions, the issuer’s financial condition or near term recovery prospects, and the effects of changes in interest rates. Our accounting policy requires that a decline in the fair value of a security below its cost basis be assessed to determine if the decline is other than temporary. If

 

20


Table of Contents

so, the security is deemed to be impaired, and a charge is recorded in net realized losses equal to the difference between the fair value and the cost basis of the security. The fair value of the impaired investment becomes its new cost basis.

 

The composition of the investment portfolio at December 31, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:

 

     2009     2008  

U.S. government agency securities

   12   17

Corporate bonds

   2      —     

Obligations of state and political subdivisions

   23      46   

Equity securities

   63      37   
            
   100   100
            

 

Loss and loss adjustment recoveries of $2,924,184 were recorded in 2009 compared to loss and loss adjustment expenses of $1,261,347 in 2008. The 2009 recorded recoveries are as a result of, (1) the reduction in loss reserves related to the CNA treaty following the determination of the ultimate settlement amount in view of the finalization of the Commutation Agreement, and (2) the recognition of the payment of $500,891 received from VSC in satisfaction of certain recoveries not previously remitted by VSC under retrocession contracts between AMIC Ltd. and VSC for the years 1989-1993. Our loss ratio, calculated as the ratio of losses and loss adjustment expenses to net premiums earned, was (90.4%) in 2009 and 15.1% in 2008. The reason for the favorable development of prior years’ estimates is discussed in more detail on page 27 under the caption “Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses.”

 

Policy acquisition costs of $868,155 were expensed in 2009 compared to $2,379,800 in 2008, a decrease of 63.5%. Policy acquisition costs, which are primarily ceding commissions paid to the ceding insurer, are established as a percentage of premiums written; therefore, any increase or decrease in premiums written will result in a similar increase or decrease in policy acquisition costs. Such costs as a percentage of premiums earned were 26.8% in 2009 and 28.4% in 2008.

 

Total operating and management expenses were $2,744,039 for 2009 compared to $2,284,767 for 2008, an increase of $459,272, primarily due to an increase in directors fees and expenses, management and professional fees, business development expenses and start-up costs of our new business venture.

 

21


Table of Contents

Fair Value of Investments

 

The following tables show the fair value of the Company’s investments in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standard Codification 820 (“ASC 820”), ”Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” as of December 31, 2009 and 2008.

 

               Fair value measurement using:
     Carrying
amount
   Total fair
value
   Quoted prices
in active
markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
   Significant other
observable inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)

December 31, 2009

              

U.S. government agency securities:

              

Mortgage-backed securities

   $ 3,033,905    $ 3,033,905    $ —      $ 3,033,905    $ —  

Obligations of state and political subdivisions

     5,986,075      5,986,075         5,986,075   

Corporate securities

     528,461      528,461         528,461   
                      

Total fixed maturity investments

     9,548,441      9,548,441         
                      

Equity securities (other than hedge fund)

     16,210,811      16,210,811      16,210,811      

Hedge fund

     1,389,737      1,389,737            1,389,737
                      

Total equity securities

     17,600,548      17,600,548         
                                  

Total investments

   $ 27,148,989    $ 27,148,989    $ 16,210,811    $ 9,548,441    $ 1,389,737
                                  

 

               Fair value measurement using:
   Carrying 
amount
   Total fair 
value
   Quoted prices
in active
markets for
identical assets 
(Level 1)
   Significant other
observable inputs 
(Level 2)
   Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)

December 31, 2008

              

U.S. government agency securities:

              

Mortgage-backed securities

   $ 7,635,489    $ 7,635,489    $      $ 7,635,489    $  

Non-mortgage-backed securities

     7,787,938      7,787,938         7,787,938   

Obligations of state and political subdivisions

     13,707,329      13,707,329         13,707,329   
                      

Total fixed maturity investments

     29,130,756      29,130,756         
                      

Equity securities (other than hedge fund)

     15,751,620      15,751,620      15,751,620      

Hedge fund

     1,152,548      1,152,548            1,152,548
                      

Total equity securities

     16,904,168      16,904,168         
                                  

Total investments

   $ 46,034,924    $ 46,034,924    $ 15,751,620    $ 29,130,756    $ 1,152,548
                                  

 

22


Table of Contents

The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of investments using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

     Fair value
measurement using 
significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
hedge fund

Balance classified as Level 3, January 1, 2009

   $ 1,152,548

Total gains or losses included in earnings:

     —  

Net realized gains

     —  

Change in fair value of hedge fund investments

     237,189

Purchases or sales

     —  

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3

     —  
      

Ending balance, December 31, 2009

   $ 1,389,737
      

 

The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of investments using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

     Fair value
measurement using 
significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
hedge fund
 

Balance classified as Level 3, January 1, 2008

   $ 1,487,266   

Total gains or losses included in earnings:

     —     

Net realized gains

     —     

Change in fair value of hedge fund investments

     (334,718

Purchases or sales

     —     

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3

     —     
        

Ending balance, December 31, 2008

   $ 1,152,548   
        

 

Upon the adoption of ASC 320, Investments—Debt and Equity Securities effective April 1, 2009, the Company changed its process for assessing whether declines in the fair value of its fixed maturity investments represented impairments that are other-than-temporary. The process now includes reviewing each fixed maturity investment that is impaired and determining: (1) if the Company has the intent to sell the fixed maturity investment or (2) if it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the fixed maturity investment before its anticipated recovery; and (3) assessing whether a credit loss exists, that is, where the Company expects that the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected from the fixed maturity investment are less than the amortized cost basis of the investment.

 

The Company had no planned sales of its fixed maturity investments classified as available-for-sale as at December 31, 2009. In assessing whether it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell a fixed maturity investment before its anticipated recovery, the Company considers various factors including its future cash flow requirements, legal and regulatory requirements, the level of its cash, cash equivalents, short term investments and fixed maturity investments available for sale in an unrealized gain position, and other relevant factors. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company did not recognize any other-than-temporary impairments due to required sales.

 

In evaluating credit losses, the Company considers a variety of factors in the assessment of a fixed maturity investment including: (1) the time period during which there has been a significant decline below cost; (2) the

 

23


Table of Contents

extent of the decline below cost and par; (3) the potential for the fixed maturity investment to recover in value; (4) an analysis of the financial condition of the issuer; (5) the rating of the issuer; and (6) failure of the issuer of the fixed maturity investment to make scheduled interest or principal payments.

 

If we conclude a security is other-than-temporarily impaired, we write down the amortized cost of the security to fair value, with a charge to net realized investment gains (losses) in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Gross unrealized losses on the investment portfolio as of December 31, 2009 amounted to $42,142 compared to $33,016 as of December 31, 2008. This increased loss was mainly attributable to fixed income securities which we determined were not other than temporarily impaired. The Company has the intent and ability to hold these securities either to maturity or until the fair value recovers above the adjusted cost. The change in unrealized losses from these securities were not as a result of credit, collateral or structural issues. As a result of the decline in fair value below cost, the Company recorded a total other-than-temporary impairment charge of $847,889 and $5,271,859 on 28 and 47 equity securities during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

Our fixed income, equity and hedge fund portfolios are invested in accordance with a written Investment Policy Statement adopted by our Board of Directors. We engage professional advisors to manage day to day investment matters under the oversight of our Investment Committee.

 

Our fixed income portfolio is managed with the target objectives of achieving an annualized rate of return for the trailing 5-year period of 250 basis points over the Consumer Price Index, and total returns commensurate with Merrill Lynch’s U.S. Domestic Index. Our overall fixed income portfolio is required to have at least an “A” S&P rating, an “A2” Moody’s rating or an equivalent rating from comparable rating agencies.

 

Our equity portfolios are managed with the target objectives of achieving an annualized rate of return over a trailing 3-year to 5-year period of 400 basis points over the Consumer Price Index, total returns at least equal to representative benchmarks such as the various S&P indices, and a ranking in the top half of the universe of other actively managed equity funds with similar objectives and risk profiles.

 

Our hedge fund portfolio is managed to reduce overall portfolio risk. It is required to invest over all major strategies and is limited to 10% of the total equity portfolio.

 

Under existing accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we are required to recognize certain assets at their fair value in our consolidated balance sheets. This includes our fixed maturity investments and equity securities. In accordance with the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB ASC, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the ASC, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon whether the inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability are observable or unobservable in the market at the measurement date, with quoted market prices being the highest level (Level 1) and unobservable inputs being the lowest level (Level 3). A fair value measurement will fall within the level of the hierarchy based on the input that is significant to determining such measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:

 

   

Level 1: Observable inputs to the valuation methodology that are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

 

   

Level 2: Observable inputs to the valuation methodology other than quoted market prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical assets in markets that are not active and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

 

   

Level 3: Inputs to the valuation methodology that are unobservable for the asset or liability.

 

24


Table of Contents

At each measurement date, we estimate the fair value of the financial instruments using various valuation techniques. We utilize, to the extent available, quoted market prices in active markets or observable market inputs in estimating the fair value of our investments. When quoted market prices or observable market inputs are not available, we utilize valuation techniques that rely on unobservable inputs to estimate the fair value of investments. The following describes the valuation techniques we used to determine the fair value of investments held as of December 31, 2009 and what level within the fair value hierarchy the valuation technique resides.

 

   

U.S. government agency securities: Comprised primarily of bonds issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Federal Farm Credit Bank and the Federal National Mortgage Association. The fair values of U.S. government agency securities are priced using the spread above the risk-free U.S. Treasury yield curve. As the yields for the risk-free U.S. Treasury yield curve are observable market inputs, the fair values of U.S. government agency securities are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy. AmerInst considers that there is a liquid market for the types of securities held. Broker quotes are not used for fair value pricing.

 

   

Corporate debt securities: Comprised of bonds issued by corporations. The fair values of these securities are based on quotes and current market spread relationship, and are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy. AmerInst considers that there is a liquid market for the types of securities held. Broker quotes are not used for fair value pricing.

 

   

Obligations of state and political subdivisions: Comprised of fixed income obligations of state and local governmental municipalities. The fair values of these securities are based on quotes and current market spread relationship, and are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy. AmerInst considers that there is a liquid market for the types of securities held. Broker quotes are not used for fair value pricing.

 

   

Equity securities, at fair value: Comprised primarily of investments in the common stock of publicly traded companies. All of the Company’s equities are included in the Level 1 fair value hierarchy. The Company receives prices based on closing exchange prices from independent pricing sources to measure fair values for the equities.

 

   

Hedge fund: Comprised of a hedge fund whose objective is to seek attractive long-term returns with lower volatility by investing in a range of diversified investment strategies. The fund invests in a diversified pool of hedge fund managers, generally across six different strategies: long/short equities, long/short credit, macro, multi-strategy opportunistic, activist, and portfolio hedge. The fair value of the hedge fund is based on the net asset value of the fund as reported by the fund manager. The fair value of our hedge fund is included in the Level 3 fair value hierarchy.

 

To validate prices, we complete quantitative analyses to compare the performance of the overall investment portfolio to the performance of an appropriate benchmark, with significant differences identified and investigated.

 

There have been no material changes to any of our valuation techniques from what was used as of December 31, 2008. Since the fair value of a financial instrument is an estimate of what a willing buyer would pay for our asset if we sold it, we will not know the ultimate value of our financial instruments until they are sold. We believe the valuation techniques utilized provide us with the best estimate of the price that would be received to sell our assets or transfer our liabilities in an orderly transaction between participants at the measurement date.

 

In late 2008 and into 2009, the capital markets were illiquid, reflecting uncertainties associated with the mortgage crisis, worsening economic conditions, widening of credit spreads, bankruptcies and government intervention in large financial institutions. Though current market conditions appear to have stabilized and even improved recently resulting in realized and unrealized gains in our investment portfolio, there is still the potential for further instability which could present additional risks and uncertainties for our business and make it more difficult to value certain of our securities if trading becomes less frequent. As such, valuations may include assumptions and estimates that may have significant period-to-period changes that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

 

25


Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2009, our total investments were $27,148,989, a decrease of $18,885,935, or 41.0%, from $46,034,924 at December 31, 2008. The decrease was primarily due to the sale of investments from the Company’s fixed income investment portfolio to fund the payment to CNA of $20,550,000 as required by the Commutation Agreement. The cash and cash equivalents balance increased from $887,107 at December 31, 2008 to $3,472,529 at December 31, 2009, an increase of $2,585,422, or 291.4%. The amount of cash and cash equivalents varies depending on the maturities of fixed term investments and on the level of funds invested in money market mutual funds. The restricted cash and cash equivalents balance increased from $316,841 at December 31, 2008 to $734,020 at December 31, 2009, an increase of $417,179. The increase is due to the timing of sales and maturities of investments held as restricted cash at December 31, 2009 that have not yet been reinvested. The ratio of cash and total investments to total liabilities at December 31, 2009 was 13.14:1, compared to a ratio of 1.65:1 at December 31, 2008. The ratio results at December 31, 2009 are due to the reduction in loss reserves arising from the CNA commutation.

 

As noted in “Historical Relationship with CNA” section above, the Company paid to CNA $20,550,000 on May 22, 2009. Subsequent to the payment of this settlement, the Company will continue to meet its cash flow requirements from its investment portfolios and the investment income that it earns on these, and the Company believes it will continue to remain in compliance with the minimum solvency and liquidity requirements of the insurance regulations of Bermuda. Management believes the Company will have sufficient existing resources to meet future operating expenses and implement its new business plan.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Our cash needs consist of settlement of losses and expenses under our reinsurance treaties and funding day-to-day operations. Our management expects to be able to meet these needs from premiums received and cash flows arising from our investment portfolio. Because substantially all of our assets are marketable securities, we expect that we will have sufficient flexibility to provide for unbudgeted cash needs which may arise without resorting to borrowing, subject to regulatory limitations.

 

Assumed reinsurance premiums receivable represent current assumed premiums receivable less commissions payable to the fronting carriers. This balance was nil at December 31, 2009 and $352,085 at December 31, 2008. This balance fluctuates due to the timing of renewal premiums written.

 

Assumed reinsurance payable represents current reinsurance losses payable to the fronting carriers. This balance was $148,850 at December 31, 2009.

 

The funds deposited with a reinsurer represent cash placed with the ceding company as collateral for obligations assumed under the attorneys’ liability program written in 2003.

 

Deferred policy acquisition costs, which represent the deferral of ceding commission expense related to premiums not yet earned, decreased from $1,044,347 at December 31, 2008 to nil due to the 2009 Reinsurance Treaties being rescinded and terminated retroactive to their inception.

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets were $215,098 at December 31, 2009, a decrease of 5.8% from 2008. These expenses relate to prepaid directors and officers’ liability insurance costs, director’s retainer, and management fees.

 

AmerInst paid two semi-annual dividends of $0.47 per share during 2009 and 2008. During 2009, the dividend amount was reduced by $33,862, which represents a write back of uncashed dividends issued prior to 2003 to shareholders that we have been unable to locate. During 2008, the dividend amount was reduced by $29,080, which represents a write back of uncashed dividends issued prior to 2001 to shareholders that we have been unable to locate. Since AmerInst began paying consecutive dividends in 1995, our original shareholders have received approximately $16.96 in cumulative dividends per share, which when measured by a total rate of

 

26


Table of Contents

return calculation has resulted in an effective annual rate of return of approximately 10.83% from the inception of the Company, based on a per share purchase price of $8.33 paid by the original shareholders, and using a book value of $39.99 per share as of December 31, 2009.

 

Total dividends declared were $662,249 and $673,514 in 2009 and 2008, respectively, net of the recorded write backs. Continuation of dividend payments is subject to the Board of Directors’ continuing evaluation of our level of surplus compared to our capacity to accept more business. One of our objectives is to build surplus to retain flexibility for future business expansions.

 

AMIC Ltd.’s ability to pay dividends to AmerInst is subject to the provisions of the Bermuda insurance and companies laws. Under the Companies Act, AMIC Ltd. would be prohibited from declaring or paying a dividend at December 31, 2009 if such payment would reduce the realizable value of its assets to an amount less than the aggregate value of its liabilities, issued share capital, and share premium accounts. As at December 31, 2009, approximately $30 million was available for the payment of dividends to shareholders. In addition, AMIC Ltd. must be able to pay its liabilities as they fall due after the payment of a dividend. Our ability to pay dividends to common shareholders and to pay our operating expenses is dependent on cash dividends from our subsidiaries. The payment of such dividends by AMIC Ltd., including its subsidiary, Investco, to us is also limited under Bermuda law by the Insurance Act and Related Regulations which require that AMIC Ltd. maintain minimum levels of solvency and liquidity. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 these requirements have been met as follows:

 

     Statutory
Capital & Surplus
   Relevant Assets
     Minimum    Actual    Minimum    Actual

December 31, 2009

   $ 1,000,000    $ 31,177,595    $ 9,445,328    $ 9,445,328

December 31, 2008

   $ 3,662,424    $ 24,632,564    $ 29,227,476    $ 30,251,246

 

The December 31, 2008 Actual Relevant Assets position has been restated from $66,540,279 to $30,251,246 to properly reflect the Actual Relevant Assets position approved by the BMA in that year.

 

The Bermuda Monetary Authority has authorized Investco to purchase the Company’s common shares from shareholders who have died or retired from the practice of public accounting and on a negotiated basis. Through March 1, 2010, Investco had purchased 93,874 common shares from shareholders who had died or retired for a total purchase price of $2,019,194. From time to time, Investco has also purchased shares in privately negotiated transactions. Through that date, Investco had purchased an additional 66,615 common shares in such privately negotiated transactions for a total purchase price of $875,111.

 

Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses

 

The consolidated financial statements include our estimated liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) for our insurance operations. LAE is determined utilizing both case-basis evaluations and actuarial projections, which together represent an estimate of the ultimate net cost of all unpaid losses and LAE incurred through December 31 of each year. These estimates are subject to the effect of trends in future claim severity and frequency. The estimates are continually reviewed and, as experience develops and new information becomes known, the liability is adjusted as appropriate, and reflected in current financial reports. The anticipated effect of inflation is implicitly considered when estimating liabilities for losses and LAE. Future average severity is projected based on historical trends adjusted for anticipated changes in underwriting standards, policy provisions and general economic trends. These anticipated trends are monitored based on actual developments and are modified as necessary.

 

An actuarial review and projection was performed for us by our independent actuary as of September 30 and December 31, 2009 and as of June 30 and December 31, 2008. We review the actuarial estimates throughout the year for the possible impact on our financial position. As noted in our discussion of our results of operations, we

 

27


Table of Contents

recorded a reduction of approximately $5,400,000 in recognition of positive development recorded as a result of updating the estimated liability for unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses on the finalization of the Commutation Agreement with CNA, and the recovery from VSC.

 

As a result of the commutation, the Company does not carry any loss reserves relating to the CNA program. Loss reserves relate only to the attorneys’ professional liability coverage (“PDIC”) and CAMICO Mutual Insurance Company (“CAMICO”) programs and were calculated under the methodologies described below.

 

PDIC was a new program for the Company in 2003. The relationship with the carrier of that insurance ended on December 31, 2003. Therefore, policies written during 2003 are the only ones we have reinsured. To calculate the policy year ultimate losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses for PDIC the actuary applied incurred loss development, incurred Bornhuetter-Ferguson (“BF”), and expected loss methods to the actual PDIC experience. In the calculations, the actuary used industry incurred loss and allocated loss adjustment expenses development patterns and an a priori loss and allocated loss adjustment expenses ratio for use in the BF and expected loss and allocated loss adjustment expenses method calculations. The a priori loss and allocated loss adjustment expenses ratio was selected judgmentally based on the Company’s unpaid claim liability review as of December 31, 2008. The actuary judgmentally selected low and high scenario loss ratio estimates around their central loss ratio estimates. The low and high scenario ultimate loss and allocated loss adjustment expenses estimates were calculated by multiplying net earned premium through December 31, 2009 by the low and high scenario loss ratio selections.

 

CAMICO was a new program for the Company in 2005. To calculate the policy year ultimate losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses for CAMICO the actuary applied paid and incurred loss development, paid and incurred BF, and expected loss and allocated loss adjustment expenses ratio methods to the actual CAMICO experience as of December 31, 2009. In the calculations, the actuary used industry benchmark paid and incurred loss and allocated loss adjustment expenses development patterns. The a priori loss and allocated loss adjustment expenses ratios used in the BF and expected loss and allocated loss adjustment expenses method calculations were selected judgmentally based on the Company’s unpaid claim liability review of CAMICO experience as of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009.

 

28


Table of Contents

The following table shows the development of the estimated liability for the previous ten years of the Company’s operations:

 

ANALYSIS OF LOSS AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES DEVELOPMENT

(Thousands of US Dollars)

 

    Year Ended December 31,
    1999   2000   2001   2002   2003   2004   2005   2006   2007   2008   2009

Gross Liability for Loss and LAE Reserves

  $ 25,037   $ 27,703   $ 29,243   $ 30,479   $ 28,724   $ 29,702   $ 28,885   $ 28,161   $ 27,411   $ 24,416   $ 1,510

Reinsurance Recoverable for Unpaid Loss and LAE Reserves

    674     674     674     674     —       —       —       —       —       —       —  
                                                                 

Net Liability for Unpaid Losses and LAE Reserves

  $ 24,363   $ 27,029   $ 28,569   $ 29,805   $ 28,724   $ 29,702   $ 28,885   $ 28,161   $ 27,411   $ 24,416   $ 1,510

 

    Year Ended December 31,
    1999   2000   2001   2002   2003   2004   2005   2006   2007   2008   2009

Losses Re-estimated as of:

                     

One Year Later

  $ 24,368   $ 24,873   $ 27,993   $ 25,193   $ 27,210   $ 27,454   $ 26,323   $ 25,521   $ 22,139   $ 22,139   —  

Two Years Later

    20,602     24,297     23,514     23,676     24,962     24,893     23,493     19,780     18,006    

Three Years Later

    20,026     21,008     21,997     21,429     22,400     22,062     17,752     15,143      

Four Years Later

    17,724     19,491     19,750     18,867     19,570     16,321     13,916        

Five Years Later

    16,207     17,244     17,188     16,037     13,836     14,115          

Six Years Later

    14,437     15,215     14,688     11,783     12,976            

Seven Years Later

    12,966     13,430     11,221     11,120              

Eight Years Later

    11,840     11,639     10,707                

Nine Years Later

    11,102     11,160                  

Ten Years Later

    10,718                    

Cumulative Redundancy (Deficiency)

    13,645     15,869     17,862     18,685     15,748     15,586     14,968     13,017     9,404     3,312   —  

Cumulative Amount Paid Through:

                     

One Year Later

    3,302     4,340     3,851     3,697     3,557     4,678     3,820     3,314     3,970     19,902   —  

Two Years Later

    6,726     7,073     6,600     6,165     6,943     7,729     6,166     6,310     17,208    

Three Years Later

    8,592     8,904     8,145     7,915     8,995     9,049     8,176     14,653      

Four Years Later

    9,747     9,781     8,736     8,954     9,690     10,225     13,675        

Five Years Later

    10,028     9,906     9,174     9,079     10,149     13,957          

Six Years Later

    9,895     10,142     9,240     9,205     12,885            

Seven Years Later

    9,989     10,173     9,299     11,120              

Eight Years Later

    10,001     10,196     10,707                

Nine Years Later

    10,006     11,159                  

Ten Years Later

    10,719                    

 

The above table of losses re-estimated has been prepared on a net basis—i.e., loss and loss adjustment expenses and reinsurance recoveries receivable have not been grossed-up. The table has been prepared on a net basis due to the relative immateriality of reinsurance balances when considered in relation to total loss and loss adjustment expense reserves, and due to the costs of providing such information relative to any benefits of providing it.

 

The above table presents the development of balance sheet liabilities for 1999 through 2009 as of year-end 2009, and includes the CNA program liabilities through 2008. The top line of the table shows the original recorded unpaid liability for losses and LAE recorded at the balance sheet date for each of the indicated years.

 

29


Table of Contents

This liability represents the estimated amount of losses and LAE for claims arising in all prior years, both paid and unpaid at the balance sheet date, including losses that had been incurred, but not yet reported, to the Company. The upper portion of the table shows the experience as of the end of each succeeding year. The estimate is increased or decreased as more information becomes known about the frequency and severity of claims.

 

The “cumulative redundancy (deficiency)” represents the aggregate change in the estimates over all prior years. For example, the 2005 liability has developed a $14,968,000 redundancy which has been reflected in income in subsequent years as the reserves were re-estimated.

 

The lower section of the table shows the cumulative amount paid in respect of the previously recorded liability as of the end of each succeeding year. For example, the 2005 year end liability was originally $28,885,000. As of December 31, 2009, we had paid $13,675,000 of the currently estimated $13,916,000 of losses and LAE that had been incurred for 2005 and prior years through the end of 2009; thus an estimated $241,000 in losses incurred through 2005 remain unpaid as of the current financial statement date.

 

In evaluating this information, it should be understood that each amount includes the effects of all changes in amounts for prior periods. This table does not present accident or policy year development data, which readers may be more accustomed to analyzing. Conditions and trends that have affected development of liabilities in the past may not necessarily occur in the future. Accordingly, it may not be appropriate to extrapolate future redundancies or deficiencies based on this table.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements required to be disclosed under Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

Not applicable.

 

30


Table of Contents

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

The financial statements required by this Item are listed below:

 

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES

 

     Page

Financial Statements:

  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   32

Consolidated Balance Sheets

   33

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

   34

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

   35

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

   36

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

   37

Financial Statement Schedules:

  

Schedule I, Consolidated Summary of Investments

   54

 

Schedules II, III, IV, V, and VI are omitted as they are inapplicable, immaterial, or because the required information may be found in the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.

 

31


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd.

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income (loss), changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index and included in Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. and subsidiaries as at December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

 

/s/    Deloitte & Touche

 

Hamilton, Bermuda

March 29, 2010

 

32


Table of Contents

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2009 and 2008

(expressed in U.S. dollars)

 

     2009     2008  

ASSETS

    

Investments (Notes 3 and 4):

    

Fixed maturity investments, at fair value (amortized cost $9,394,968 and $28,471,984)

   $ 9,548,441      $ 29,130,756   

Equity securities, at fair value (cost $11,142,968 and $14,831,578)

     17,600,548        16,904,168   
                

TOTAL INVESTMENTS

     27,148,989        46,034,924   

Cash and cash equivalents

     3,472,529        887,107   

Restricted cash and cash equivalents

     734,020        316,841   

Assumed reinsurance premiums receivable

     —          352,085   

Funds deposited with a reinsurer (Note 3)

     113,382        113,382   

Accrued investment income

     90,851        330,794   

Property and equipment

     100,157        —     

Deferred policy acquisition costs

     —          1,044,347   

Prepaid expenses and other assets

     215,098        228,435   
                

TOTAL ASSETS

   $ 31,875,026      $ 49,307,915   
                

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

    

LIABILITIES

    

Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses (Note 5)

   $ 1,510,478      $ 24,416,157   

Unearned premiums

     —          3,619,371   

Assumed reinsurance payable

     148,850        —     

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

     727,319        516,143   
                

TOTAL LIABILITIES

   $ 2,386,647      $ 28,551,671   
                

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

    

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

    

Common shares, $1 par value, 2009 and 2008: 2,000,000 shares authorized, 995,253 issued and outstanding

     995,253        995,253   

Additional paid-in-capital

     6,287,293        6,287,293   

Retained earnings

     20,846,392        15,757,104   

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     6,611,053        2,731,362   

Shares held by Subsidiary (257,820 and 250,035 shares) at cost

     (5,251,612     (5,014,768
                

TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

     29,488,379        20,756,244   
                

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   $ 31,875,026      $ 49,307,915   
                

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

33


Table of Contents

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008

(expressed in U.S. dollars)

 

     2009     2008  

REVENUES

    

Net premiums earned (Note 1)

   $ 3,235,446      $ 8,367,209   

Net investment income (Note 4)

     766,512        1,483,173   

Net realized gain (loss) on investments (Note 4)

     2,437,589        (4,558,251
                

TOTAL REVENUES

     6,439,547        5,292,131   
                

LOSSES AND EXPENSES

    

Losses and loss adjustment (recoveries) expenses (Note 5)

     (2,924,184     1,261,347   

Policy acquisition costs

     868,155        2,379,800   

Operating and management expenses (Note 8)

     2,744,039        2,284,767   
                

TOTAL LOSSES AND EXPENSES

     688,010        5,925,914   
                

NET INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE TAX

     5,751,537        (633,783
                

Income tax expense (Note 9)

     —          —     

NET INCOME (LOSS) AFTER TAX

     5,751,537        (633,783

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

    

Net unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period

     6,317,280        (9,455,793

Reclassification adjustment for (gain) loss included in net income

     (2,437,589     4,558,251   
                

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

     3,879,691        (4,897,542
                

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

   $ 9,631,228      $ (5,531,325
                

BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

   $ 7.77      $ (0.85
                

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year

     739,932        746,701   
                

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

34


Table of Contents

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008

(expressed in U.S. dollars)

 

    Common
Shares
  Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Retained
Earnings
    Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income, Net of
Tax
    Shares
Held by
Subsidiary
    Total
Shareholders’
Equity
 

BALANCE AT JANUARY 1, 2008

  $ 995,253   $ 6,287,293   $ 17,064,401      $ 7,628,904      $ (4,863,152   $ 27,112,699   

Net (loss)

    —       —       (633,783     —          —          (633,783

Other comprehensive income

           

Unrealized (losses) on securities, net of reclassification adjustment

    —       —       —          (4,897,542     —          (4,897,542

Purchase of shares by subsidiary

    —       —       —          —          (151,616     (151,616

Dividends ($0.94 per share)

    —       —       (673,514     —          —          (673,514
                                           

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2008

  $ 995,253   $ 6,287,293   $ 15,757,104      $ 2,731,362      $ (5,014,768   $ 20,756,244   
                                           

Net income

    —       —       5,751,537        —          —          5,751,537   

Other comprehensive income

           

Unrealized gains on securities, net of reclassification adjustment

    —       —       —          3,879,691        —          3,879,691   

Purchase of shares by subsidiary

    —       —       —          —          (236,844     (236,844

Dividends ($0.94 per share)

    —       —       (662,249     —          —          (662,249
                                           

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2009

  $ 995,253   $ 6,287,293   $ 20,846,392      $ 6,611,053      $ (5,251,612   $ 29,488,379   
                                           

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

35


Table of Contents

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008

(expressed in U.S. dollars)

 

     2009     2008  

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

    

Net income (loss)

   $ 5,751,537      $ (633,783

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Amortization of net discounts (premiums) on investments

     68,510        (126,707

Net realized (gains) losses on sale of investments

     (2,437,589     4,558,251   

Changes in assets and liabilities:

    

Assumed reinsurance premiums receivable

     500,935        253,671   

Accrued investment income

     239,943        (67,611

Deferred policy acquisition costs

     1,044,347        (1,618

Prepaid expenses and other assets

     13,337        6,967   

Liability for losses and loss adjustment expenses

     (22,905,679     (2,993,465

Unearned premiums

     (3,619,371     26,496   

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

     211,176        130,459   
                

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

     (21,132,854     1,152,660   
                

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

    

Movement in restricted cash and cash equivalents

     (417,179     524,761   

Purchases of property and equipment

     (100,157     —     

Purchases of available-for-sale securities

     (12,498,473     (27,175,102

Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities

     34,235,694        20,456,120   

Proceeds from maturities of fixed maturity investments

     3,397,484        4,975,000   
                

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

     24,617,369        (1,219,221
                

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

    

Dividends paid

     (662,249     (673,514

Purchase of shares by subsidiary

     (236,844     (151,616
                

Net cash used in financing activities

     (899,093     (825,130
                

NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

     2,585,422        (891,691

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR

     887,107        1,778,798   
                

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR

   $ 3,472,529      $ 887,107   
                

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

36


Table of Contents

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

 

AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd., (“AmerInst” or the “Company”) was formed under the laws of Bermuda in 1998. The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary AmerInst Insurance Company, Ltd. (“AMIC Ltd.”) and its predecessor AmerInst Insurance Company, Inc. (“AIIC Inc.”), were engaged in the reinsurance of claims-made insurance policies of participants in an American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) sponsored insurance program that provides accountants’ professional liability insurance coverage (“AICPA Plan”) through December 31, 2008.

 

The reinsurance activity of AMIC Ltd. depends upon agreements entered into with outside parties.

 

Entry into Agency Agreement

 

Effective September 25, 2009, AmerInst Professional Services, Limited (“APSL”), a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of AmerInst Mezco, Ltd. (“Mezco”) which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AmerInst, entered into an agency agreement (the “Agency Agreement”) with The North River Insurance Company, United States Fire Insurance Company, Crum & Forster Indemnity Company, Crum and Forster Insurance Company, and Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company (collectively, “C&F”) pursuant to which C&F appointed APSL as its exclusive agent for the purposes of soliciting, underwriting, quoting, binding, issuing, cancelling, non-renewing and endorsing accountants’ professional liability and lawyers’ professional liability insurance coverage within the 50 states of the United States and the District of Columbia. The initial term of the Agency Agreement is for four years with automatic one year renewals. No underwriting activity occurred through December 31, 2009.

 

Entry into Reinsurance Agreement

 

We conduct our reinsurance business through AMIC Ltd., our subsidiary, which is a registered insurer in Bermuda. On September 25, 2009, AMIC Ltd. entered into a professional liability quota share agreement with C&F (the “Reinsurance Agreement”) pursuant to which C&F agrees to cede and AMIC Ltd. agrees to accept as reinsurance a fifty percent (50%) quota share of C&F’s liability under insurance written by APSL on behalf of C&F and classified by C&F as accountants’ professional liability and lawyers’ professional liability, subject to AMIC Ltd. surplus limitations. The initial term of the Reinsurance Agreement is for four years with automatic one year renewals. No underwriting activity occurred under the Reinsurance Agreement through December 31, 2009.

 

Historical Relationship with CNA

 

Historically, the primary business activity of our wholly owned insurance subsidiary, AMIC Ltd., has been to act as a reinsurer of professional liability insurance policies that are issued under the Professional Liability Insurance Plan sponsored by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”). The AICPA plan offers professional liability coverage to accounting firms and individual CPAs in all 50 states.

 

Our reinsurance activity depends upon agreements with outside parties. In August 1993, AMIG, our predecessor entity, began our reinsurance relationship with CNA. On January 5, 2009, AMIC Ltd. received written notice from CNA Financial Corporation (“CNA”) that CNA did not intend to renew the reinsurance program encompassed by the AmerInst Insurance Company Limited Accountants Professional Liability Treaty and the Value Plan Policies Accountants Professional Liability Quota Share Treaty (the “Reinsurance Treaties”). In 2008, the business relationship with CNA accounted for approximately 95% of AmerInst’s net premiums earned.

 

37


Table of Contents

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

On May 15, 2009, AMIC Ltd. and CNA entered into a Commutation and Release Agreement whereby:

 

   

Our relationship with CNA terminated effective December 31, 2008;

 

   

AMIC Ltd. paid to CNA $20,550,000 on May 22, 2009;

 

   

CNA released and discharged AMIC Ltd. from any claims or liabilities whatsoever under, arising out of, or in any way related to past Reinsurance Treaties;

 

   

AMIC Ltd. released and discharged CNA from any claims or liabilities whatsoever under, arising out of, or in any way related to the past Reinsurance Treaties;

 

   

All rights, duties, liabilities, and obligations of AMIC Ltd. and CNA under the current Reinsurance Treaties were discharged;

 

   

The 2009 Reinsurance Treaties were rescinded and terminated retroactive to their inception; and

 

   

The 2009 Reinsurance Treaties were void as though they never existed.

 

The Company has reduced its estimated liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses by approximately $5,400,000 to reflect the impact of the Commutation Agreement.

 

Included in net income for the year ended December 31, 2009 is earned premium of approximately $2,800,000, losses and loss adjustment expenses and policy acquisition costs of approximately $2,000,000 and $800,000, respectively, relating to the commuted treaties. Since the Commutation Agreement rescinded and terminated the 2009 Reinsurance Treaties retroactive to their inception, such treaties are not recorded in these consolidated financial statements.

 

Historical Relationship with CAMICO

 

From June 1, 2005 through May 31, 2009, we were a party to a reinsurance contract with CAMICO Mutual Insurance Company (“CAMICO”), a California-based writer of accountants’ professional liability business. Effective June 1, 2009, we decided not to renew the CAMICO contract and permitted the contract to expire pursuant to its terms. In 2008, the business relationship with CAMICO accounted for approximately 5% of AmerInst’s net premiums earned. We remain potentially liable for claims related to coverage through May 31, 2009.

 

VSC Payment

 

On July 22, 2009, the Company received a payment of $500,891 from Virginia Surety Company (“VSC”) in satisfaction of certain recoveries not previously remitted by VSC under retrocession contracts between the Company and VSC for the years 1989 – 1993. The $500,891 payment was recorded as a decrease in losses and loss adjustment expenses. The Company and VSC are in dispute with respect to over $500,000 in additional recoveries, fees and interest, which the Company currently expects to resolve via arbitration.

 

Attorney’s Professional Liability Coverage

 

Effective January 1, 2003, we entered into a 15% quota share participation of the attorneys’ professional liability coverage provided by Professionals Direct Insurance Company. This participation terminated on December 31, 2003. We remain potentially liable for claims related to this period of coverage.

 

38


Table of Contents

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Basis of presentation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and include the accounts of AmerInst and its operating wholly-owned subsidiaries, AmerInst Mezco, Ltd. (“Mezco”), AMIC Ltd., APSL and AmerInst Investment Company, Ltd. (“Investco”). Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The major estimates reflected in the Company’s financial statements include but are not limited to the liability for loss and loss adjustment expenses.

 

Premiums

 

Premiums assumed are earned on a pro rata basis over the terms of the underlying policies to which they relate. Premiums assumed relating to the unexpired portion of policies in force at the balance sheet date are recorded as unearned premiums.

 

Deferred policy acquisition costs

 

Ceding commissions related to assumed reinsurance agreements are deferred and amortized pro rata over the terms of the underlying policies to which they relate.

 

Liability for losses and loss adjustment expenses

 

The liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses includes case basis estimates of reported losses plus supplemental amounts for projected losses incurred but not reported (IBNR), calculated based upon loss projections utilizing certain actuarial assumptions and AMIC Ltd.’s historical loss experience supplemented with industry data. The aggregate liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses at year end represents management’s best estimate, based upon the available data, of the amount necessary to cover the ultimate cost of loss, based upon an actuarial analysis prepared by independent actuaries. However, because of the volatility inherent in professional liability coverage, actual loss experience may not conform to the assumptions used in determining the estimated amounts for such liability at the balance sheet date. Accordingly, the ultimate liability could be significantly in excess of or less than the amount indicated in the financial statements. As adjustments to these estimates become necessary, such adjustments are reflected in current operations. AMIC Ltd. does not discount its loss reserves for purposes of these financial statements.

 

The anticipated effect of inflation is implicitly considered when estimating liabilities for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses. Future average severities are projected based on historical trends adjusted for anticipated trends, are monitored based on actual developments and are modified if necessary.

 

Investments

 

AmerInst classifies all of its investments as available-for-sale. Accordingly, AmerInst reports these securities at their estimated fair values with unrealized holding gains and losses being reported as other

 

39


Table of Contents

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

comprehensive income. Realized gains and losses on sales of investments are accounted for by specifically identifying the cost and are reflected in the income statement in the period of sale.

 

Declines in the fair value of investments below cost are evaluated for other than temporary impairment losses. The evaluation for other than temporary impairment losses is a quantitative and qualitative process which is subject to risks and uncertainties in the determination of whether declines in the fair value of investments are other than temporary. The risks and uncertainties include the Company’s intent and ability to hold the security, changes in general economic conditions, the issuer’s financial condition or near term recovery prospects, and the effects of changes in interest rates. AmerInst’s accounting policy requires that a decline in the value of a security below its cost basis be assessed to determine if the decline is other than temporary. If so, the security is deemed to be impaired and a charge is recorded in net realized losses equal to the difference between the fair value and the cost basis of the security. The fair value of the impaired investment becomes its new cost basis.

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

For purposes of the statements of cash flows, AmerInst considers all money market funds and highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

 

Income taxes

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the periods in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is provided if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Management evaluates the reliability of the deferred tax assets and assesses the need for additional valuation allowance quarterly.

 

Net income per common share

 

Basic earnings per share is determined as net income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. There are no dilutive securities.

 

New Accounting Pronouncements

 

Accounting Standards Adopted

 

On September 15, 2009, the Company adopted FASB ASC Topic 105, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“ASC 105” or “The Codification”). ASC 105 is a replacement to FASB Statement No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” (“SFAS 162”) which became effective on November 13, 2008, and identified the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in preparing financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP. It also arranged these sources of U.S. GAAP in a hierarchy for users to apply. ASC 105 provides for a single source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied to nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements. The Codification carries the same level of authority and supersedes SFAS 162 and all other accounting and reporting standards. The U.S. GAAP hierarchy has been modified to include two levels of U.S. GAAP: authoritative and non-authoritative.

 

40


Table of Contents

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

In May 2009, the Company adopted the provisions of the FASB ASC Topic 855, “Subsequent Events” (“ASC 855”), which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The new guidance provides guidance on the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

 

On April 1, 2009, the Company adopted the provisions of the FASB ASC 820-10-35, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures—Overall—Subsequent Measurement” (“ASC 820-10-35”), ASC 825-10-50, “Financial Instruments—Overall—Disclosure” (“ASC 825-10-50”), and ASC 320-10-35, “Investments—Debt and Equity Securities—Overall—Subsequent Measurement” (“ASC 320-10-35”) intended to provide additional application guidance and enhance disclosures regarding fair value measurements and impairments of securities.

 

ASC 820-10-35 relates to determining fair values when there is no active market or where the price inputs being used represent distressed sales. It reaffirms what the objective of fair value measurement is to reflect how much an asset would be sold for in an orderly transaction (as opposed to a distressed or forced transaction) at the date of the financial statements under current market conditions. Specifically, it reaffirms the need to use judgment to ascertain if a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when markets have become inactive.

 

ASC 825-10-50 enhances consistency in financial reporting by increasing the frequency of fair value disclosures. The guidance relates to fair value disclosures for any financial instruments that are not currently reflected on the balance sheet at fair value. Prior to issuing this standard, fair values for these assets and liabilities were only disclosed annually. ASC 825-10-50 now requires these disclosures at every reporting period, providing qualitative and quantitative information about fair value estimates for all those financial instruments not measured on the balance sheet at fair value.

 

ASC 320-10-35 provides additional guidance designed to create greater clarity and consistency in accounting for and presenting impairment losses on securities. The guidance is intended to bring greater consistency to the timing of impairment recognition, and provide greater clarity to investors about the credit and noncredit components of impaired debt securities that are not expected to be sold. The measure of impairment in comprehensive income remains at fair value. ASC 320-10-35 also requires increased and more timely disclosures sought by investors regarding expected cash flows, credit losses, and an aging of securities with unrealized losses.

 

The adoption of these provisions did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

 

In January 2010, the FASB issued the revised guidance for the disclosures about fair value measurements. The revised guidance requires additional disclosures about transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 and separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3 measurements. The revised guidance also clarifies existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation and about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The revised guidance is effective for the first reporting period

 

41


Table of Contents

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

(including interim periods) beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the requirement to provide the Level 3 activity of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis, which will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this revised guidance on the consolidated financial statements.

 

3. PLEDGED ASSETS

 

Pursuant to the reinsurance agreements, AMIC Ltd. is required to provide the ceding companies with collateral for AMIC Ltd.’s liabilities to them. At December 31, 2009 and 2008 $113,382 was held in deposits pursuant to the 2003 excess reinsurance agreement with PDIC. Also at December 31, 2008, the carrying value of investments in a trust account held by Bank of New York pursuant to reinsurance agreements in effect from 1989 to mid-1993 was $2,256. Additionally, at December 31, 2008, AMIC Ltd. had provided CNA with a Section 114 Trust, held by JPMorgan Chase Bank, with restricted cash and cash equivalents and investments with a carrying value of $24,343,002, respectively. At December 31, 2009 and 2008 AMIC Ltd. provided CAMICO with a Letter of Credit held by National City Bank with supporting investments with a carrying value of $3,631,714 and $4,019,995, respectively.

 

4. INVESTMENTS

 

The cost or amortized cost, gross unrealized holding gains and losses, and estimated fair value of investments in fixed maturity investments, by major security type, and equity securities at December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

 

     Cost or
Amortized
Cost
   Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
    Estimated
Fair
Value

December 31, 2009

Fixed maturity investments:

          

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

   $ 5,862,796    $ 159,640    $ (36,361   $ 5,986,075

Mortgage-backed securities (U.S. agency backed)

     3,025,655      14,031      (5,781 )     3,033,905

Corporate bonds

     506,517      21,944      —          528,461
                            

Total fixed maturity investments

     9,394,968      195,615      (42,142     9,548,441
                            

Equity securities

     10,142,968      6,067,843      —          16,210,811

Hedge fund

     1,000,000      389,737      —          1,389,737
                            

Total equity securities

     11,142,968      6,457,580      —          17,600,548
                            

Total investments

   $ 20,537,936    $ 6,653,195    $ (42,142   $ 27,148,989
                            

 

     Cost or
Amortized
Cost
   Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
    Estimated
Fair
Value

December 31, 2008

Fixed maturity investments:

          

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

   $ 20,940,760    $ 559,499    $ (4,992   $ 21,495,267

Mortgage-backed securities (U.S. agency backed)

     7,531,224      104,265      —          7,635,489
                            

Total fixed maturity investments

     28,471,984      663,764      (4,992     29,130,756
                            

Equity securities

     13,831,578      1,948,066      (28,024     15,751,620

Hedge fund

     1,000,000      152,548      —          1,152,548
                            

Total equity securities

     14,831,578      2,100,614      (28,024     16,904,168
                            

Total investments

   $ 43,303,562    $ 2,764,378    $ (33,016   $ 46,034,924
                            

 

42


Table of Contents

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The gross unrealized loss on investments at December 31, 2009 and 2008 are categorized as follows:

 

     12 months or greater    Less than 12 months     Total  
     Estimated
Fair
Value
   Unrealized
Losses
   Estimated
Fair Value
   Unrealized
Losses
    Estimated
Fair Value
   Unrealized
Losses
 

December 31, 2009

                

Fixed maturity investments:

                

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

   $ —        —      $ 494,219    $ (5,781   $ 494,219    $ (5,781

Corporate debt securities

     —        —        —        —          —        —     

Mortgage-backed securities (U.S. agency backed)

     —        —        2,012,739      (36,361     2,012,739      (36,361
                                            

Total fixed maturity investments

     —        —        2,506,958      (42,142     2,506,958      (42,142
                                            

Equity securities

     —        —        —        —          —        —     

Hedge fund

     —        —        —        —          —        —     
                                            

Total equity securities

     —        —        —        —          —        —     
                                            

Total investments

   $ —      $ —      $ 2,506,958    $ (42,142   $ 2,506,958    $ (42,142
                                            

 

As of December 31, 2009, there were approximately 6 securities in an unrealized loss position with an estimated fair value of $2,506,958. Of these securities, there is no security that has been in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or greater. As of December 31, 2009, none of these securities were considered to be other than temporarily impaired. The unrealized losses from these securities were not a result of credit, collateral or structural issues.

 

     12 months or greater     Less than 12 months     Total  
     Estimated
Fair Value
   Unrealized
Losses
    Estimated
Fair Value
   Unrealized
Losses
    Estimated
Fair Value
   Unrealized
Losses
 

December 31, 2008

               

Fixed maturity investments:

               

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

   $ —        —        $ 1,718,215    $ (4,992   $ 1,718,215    $ (4,992

Corporate debt securities

     —        —          —        —          —        —     

Mortgage-backed securities (U.S. agency backed)

     —        —          —        —          —        —     
                                             

Total fixed maturity investments

     —        —          1,718,215      (4,992     1,718,215      (4,992
                                             

Equity securities

     105,959      (5,635     935,013      (22,389     1,040,972      (28,024

Hedge fund

     —        —          —        —          —        —     
                                             

Total equity securities

     105,959      (5,635     935,013      (22,389     1,040,972      (28,024
                                             

Total investments

   $ 105,959    $ (5,635   $ 2,653,228    $ (27,381   $ 2,759,187    $ (33,016
                                             

 

43


Table of Contents

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

As of December 31, 2008, there were approximately 9 securities in an unrealized loss position with an estimated fair value of $2,759,187. Of these securities, there was 1 security that had been in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or greater with an estimated fair value of $105,959. As of December 31, 2008, none of these securities were considered to be other than temporarily impaired. The unrealized losses from these securities were not a result of credit, collateral or structural issues.

 

The cost or amortized cost and estimated fair value of fixed maturity investments at December 31, 2009 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities as borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations without penalties.

 

     Amortized
Cost
   Estimated
Fair Value

Due in one year or less

   $ 525,000    $ 522,413

Due after one year through five years

     5,181,070      5,352,171

Due after five years through ten years

     663,243      639,952

Due after ten years

     —        —  
             

Subtotal

     6,369,313      6,514,536

Mortgage-backed securities (U.S. agency backed)

     3,025,655      3,033,905
             

Total

   $ 9,394,968    $ 9,548,441
             

 

Information on sales and maturities of investments are as follows:

 

     2009     2008  

Total proceeds on sales of securities

   $ 34,235,694      $ 20,456,120   

Total proceeds from maturities of fixed maturity investments

     3,397,484        4,975,000   

Gross gains on sales

     5,169,129        1,225,335   

Gross losses on sales

     (1,883,651     (1,767,121

Impairment losses

     (847,889     (4,016,465

 

44


Table of Contents

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Fair Value of Investments

 

The following tables show the fair value of the Company’s investments in accordance with FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” as of December 31, 2009 and 2008.

 

               Fair value measurement using:
     Carrying
amount
   Total fair
value
   Quoted prices
in active
markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
   Significant other
observable inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)

December 31, 2009

              

U.S. government agency securities:

              

Mortgage-backed securities

   $ 3,033,905    $ 3,033,905    $ —      $ 3,033,905    $ —  

Obligations of state and political subdivisions

     5,986,075      5,986,075         5,986,075   

Corporate securities

     528,461      528,461         528,461   
                      

Total fixed maturity investments

     9,548,441      9,548,441         
                      

Equity securities (other than hedge fund)

     16,210,811      16,210,811      16,210,811      

Hedge fund

     1,389,737      1,389,737            1,389,737
                      

Total equity securities

     17,600,548      17,600,548         
                                  

Total investments

   $ 27,148,989    $ 27,148,989    $ 16,210,811    $ 9,548,441    $ 1,389,737
                                  

 

     Carrying 
amount
   Total fair 
value
   Fair value measurement using:
           Quoted prices
in active
markets for
identical assets 
(Level 1)
   Significant other
observable inputs 
(Level 2)
   Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)

December 31, 2008

              

U.S. government agency securities:

              

Mortgage-backed securities

   $ 7,635,489    $ 7,635,489    $      $ 7,635,489    $  

Non-mortgage-backed securities

     7,787,938      7,787,938         7,787,938   

Obligations of state and political subdivisions

     13,707,329      13,707,329         13,707,329   
                      

Total fixed maturity investments

     29,130,756      29,130,756         
                      

Equity securities (other than hedge fund)

     15,751,620      15,751,620      15,751,620      

Hedge fund

     1,152,548      1,152,548            1,152,548
                      

Total equity securities

     16,904,168      16,904,168         
                                  

Total investments

   $ 46,034,924    $ 46,034,924    $ 15,751,620    $ 29,130,756    $ 1,152,548
                                  

 

45


Table of Contents

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of investments using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

     Fair value
measurement using 
significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
hedge fund

Balance classified as Level 3, January 1, 2009

   $ 1,152,548

Total gains or losses included in earnings:

     —  

Net realized gains

     —  

Change in fair value of hedge fund investments

     237,189

Purchases or sales

     —  

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3

     —  
      

Ending balance, December 31, 2009

   $ 1,389,737
      

 

The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of investments using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

     Fair value
measurement using 
significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
hedge fund
 

Balance classified as Level 3, January 1, 2008

   $ 1,487,266   

Total gains or losses included in earnings:

     —     

Net realized gains

     —     

Change in fair value of hedge fund investments

     (334,718

Purchases or sales

     —     

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3

     —     
        

Ending balance, December 31, 2008

   $ 1,152,548   
        

 

Under existing accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we are required to recognize certain assets at their fair value in our consolidated balance sheets. This includes our fixed maturity investments and equity securities. In accordance with the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB ASC, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the ASC, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon whether the inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability are observable or unobservable in the market at the measurement date, with quoted market prices being the highest level (Level 1) and unobservable inputs being the lowest level (Level 3). A fair value measurement will fall within the level of the hierarchy based on the input that is significant to determining such measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:

 

   

Level 1: Observable inputs to the valuation methodology that are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

 

46


Table of Contents

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

   

Level 2: Observable inputs to the valuation methodology other than quoted market prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical assets in markets that are not active and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

 

   

Level 3: Inputs to the valuation methodology that are unobservable for the asset or liability.

 

At each measurement date, we estimate the fair value of the financial instruments using various valuation techniques. We utilize, to the extent available, quoted market prices in active markets or observable market inputs in estimating the fair value of our investments. When quoted market prices or observable market inputs are not available, we utilize valuation techniques that rely on unobservable inputs to estimate the fair value of investments. The following describes the valuation techniques we used to determine the fair value of investments held as of December 31, 2009 and what level within the fair value hierarchy the valuation technique resides.

 

   

U.S. government agency securities: Comprised primarily of bonds issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Federal Farm Credit Bank and the Federal National Mortgage Association. The fair values of U.S. government agency securities are priced using the spread above the risk-free U.S. Treasury yield curve. As the yields for the risk-free U.S. Treasury yield curve are observable market inputs, the fair values of U.S. government agency securities are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy. AmerInst considers that there is a liquid market for the types of securities held. Broker quotes are not used for fair value pricing.

 

   

Corporate debt securities: Comprised of bonds issued by corporations. The fair values of these securities are based on quotes and current market spread relationship, and are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy. AmerInst considers that there is a liquid market for the types of securities held. Broker quotes are not used for fair value pricing.

 

   

Obligations of state and political subdivisions: Comprised of fixed income obligations of state and local governmental municipalities. The fair values of these securities are based on quotes and current market spread relationship, and are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy. AmerInst considers that there is a liquid market for the types of securities held. Broker quotes are not used for fair value pricing.

 

   

Equity securities, at fair value: Comprised primarily of investments in the common stock of publicly traded companies. All of the Company’s equities are included in the Level 1 fair value hierarchy. The Company receives prices based on closing exchange prices from independent pricing sources to measure fair values for the equities.

 

   

Hedge fund: Comprised of a hedge fund whose objective is to seek attractive long-term returns with lower volatility by investing in a range of diversified investment strategies. The fund invests in a diversified pool of hedge fund managers, generally across six different strategies: long/short equities, long/short credit, macro, multi-strategy opportunistic, activist, and portfolio hedge. The fair value of the hedge fund is based on the net asset value of the fund as reported by the fund manager. The fair value of our hedge fund is included in the Level 3 fair value hierarchy.

 

To validate prices, we complete quantitative analyses to compare the performance of the overall investment portfolio to the performance of an appropriate benchmark, with significant differences identified and investigated.

 

There have been no material changes to any of our valuation techniques from what was used as of December 31, 2008. Since the fair value of a financial instrument is an estimate of what a willing buyer would

 

47


Table of Contents

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

pay for our asset if we sold it, we will not know the ultimate value of our financial instruments until they are sold. We believe the valuation techniques utilized provide us with the best estimate of the price that would be received to sell our assets or transfer our liabilities in an orderly transaction between participants at the measurement date.

 

In late 2008 and into 2009, the capital markets were illiquid, reflecting uncertainties associated with the mortgage crisis, worsening economic conditions, widening of credit spreads, bankruptcies and government intervention in large financial institutions. Though current market conditions appear to have stabilized and even improved recently resulting in realized and unrealized gains in our investment portfolio, there is still the potential for further instability which could present additional risks and uncertainties for our business and make it more difficult to value certain of our securities if trading becomes less frequent. As such, valuations may include assumptions and estimates that may have significant period-to-period changes that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

 

Major categories of net interest and dividend income are summarized as follows:

 

     2009     2008  

Interest earned:

    

Fixed maturity investments

   $ 628,724      $ 1,340,972   

Short term investments and cash and cash equivalents

     5,795        42,552   

Dividends earned

     300,397        325,970   

Investment expenses

     (168,404     (226,321
                

Net investment income

   $ 766,512      $ 1,483,173   
                

 

5. LIABILITY FOR UNPAID LOSSES AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES

 

Details of the liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses and related reinsurance recoveries receivable at December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

 

     2009    2008

Case basis estimates

   $ 516,478    $ 6,330,571

Incurred But Not Reported

     994,000      18,085,586
             

Totals

   $ 1,510,478    $ 24,416,157
             

 

Liability for losses and loss adjustment expense activity is as follows:

 

     2009     2008  

Liability—beginning of year

   $ 24,416,157      $ 27,409,622   
                

Incurred related to:

    

Current year

     —          5,814,347   

Prior years

     (2,924,184     (4,553,000
                

Total incurred

     (2,924,184     1,261,347   
                

Paid related to:

    

Current year

     —          (60,654

Prior years

     (19,981,495     (4,194,158
                

Total paid

     (19,981,495     (4,254,812
                

Liability—end of year

   $ 1,510,478      $ 24,416,157   
                

 

48


Table of Contents

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

As a result of the change in estimates of insured events in prior years, the provision for losses and loss expenses decreased by $2,924,184 and $4,553,000 in 2009 and 2008, respectively. The 2009 decrease related mainly to the positive development recorded as a result of updating the estimated liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses on the finalization of the Commutation Agreement with CNA, and the recovery from VSC, as discussed in detail in Note 1. The positive loss development in 2008 reflected the recognition of better than expected loss emergence in the prior policy years rather than explicit changes to our actuarial assumptions.

 

6. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

Notwithstanding the absence of a public market for our common shares, we have a policy of having Investco, which holds our investment portfolio, purchase shares owned by our shareholders who have retired from the practice of accounting or have died. We are currently prepared to repurchase those shares at a price equal to the greater of the last year-end net book value per share or $39.99 per share.

 

7. PREMIUMS WRITTEN

 

Premiums written were $(383,926) and $8,393,705 during 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in net premiums written was due to the 2009 Reinsurance Treaties being rescinded and terminated retroactive to their inception and the decision not to renew the CAMICO contract.

 

8. OPERATING AND MANAGEMENT EXPENSES

 

AmerInst, AMIC Ltd., Mezco and Investco have no employees. Their operating activities, as well as certain management functions, are performed by contracted professional service providers. Cedar Management Limited provides AmerInst and AMIC Ltd. certain management, administrative and operations services under the direction of AmerInst’s Board of Directors pursuant to an agreement. The agreement may be terminated by either party upon not more than 90 days nor less than 60 days prior written notice. Mr. Stuart Grayston, a director and President of the Company, and Mr. Thomas McMahon, Vice President and Treasurer of the Company, are Vice President and President of Cedar Management Limited, respectively. The company paid $340,000 and $300,000 in fees during 2009 and 2008, respectively. Operating and management expenses include compensation paid to members of the Board of Directors and various committees of the Board totaling $533,055 in 2009 and $590,115 in 2008.

 

9. TAXATION

 

Under current Bermuda law, the Company and its subsidiaries are not required to pay taxes in Bermuda on either income or capital gains. The Company has received an undertaking from the Bermuda government that, in the event of income or capital gains taxes being imposed, the Company will be exempted from such taxes until the year 2016. However, APSL is a Delaware corporation domiciled in the State of Illinois, subject to taxation in the United States.

 

Deferred income taxes, arising from APSL, reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Management has reduced deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance as the success of APSL is not certain at December 31, 2009. The components of net deferred income tax assets and liabilities are comprised of the following at December 31, 2009:

 

Deferred tax asset before valuation allowance

   $ 306,000   

Less: valuation allowance

     (306,000
        

Net deferred tax assets

   $ —     
        

 

49


Table of Contents

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

10. DIVIDEND RESTRICTIONS AND STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

 

Under the Bermuda Companies Act, AmerInst is prohibited from declaring or paying a dividend as at December 31, 2009 if such payment would reduce the realizable value of its assets to an amount less than the aggregate value of its liabilities, issued share capital, and share premium accounts. In addition, it must be able to pay its liabilities as they fall due after the payment of a dividend. As at December 31, 2009, approximately $30 million was available to shareholders in accordance with these provisions.

 

AmerInst’s ability to pay common shareholders’ dividends and its operating expenses is dependent on cash dividends from AMIC Ltd. including its subsidiary, Investco (collectively the “reinsurance subsidiaries”). The payment of such dividends by the reinsurance subsidiaries to AmerInst is limited under Bermuda law by the Bermuda Insurance Act 1978 and Related Regulations, as amended, which require that AMIC Ltd. maintain minimum levels of solvency and liquidity. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 these requirements have been met. The minimum required statutory capital and surplus was $1,000,000 and $3,662,424 and actual statutory capital and surplus was $31,177,595 and $24,632,564 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The minimum required level of relevant assets was $9,445,328 and $29,227,476 and actual relevant assets was $9,445,328 and $30,251,246 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Statutory income for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $6,704,829 and $4,668,499.

 

11. UNAUDITED CONDENSED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA

 

2009

   FIRST
QUARTER
    SECOND
QUARTER
    THIRD
QUARTER
    FOURTH
QUARTER
 

Net premiums earned

   $ 1,623,652      $ 1,432,223      $ 171,272      $ 8,299   

Net investment income

     391,236        216,090        64,463        94,723   

Net realized (loss) gain

     (835,531     919,378        1,780,292        573,450   
                                

Total revenues

     1,179,357        2,567,691        2,016,027        676,472   
                                

Net income (loss)

   $ 4,291,582      $ 360,897      $ 1,798,424      $ (699,366

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share

   $ 5.77      $ 0.48      $ 2.43      $ (0.91

2008

   FIRST
QUARTER
    SECOND
QUARTER
    THIRD
QUARTER
    FOURTH
QUARTER
 

Net premiums earned

   $ 2,127,266      $ 2,041,470      $ 2,061,362      $ 2,137,111   

Net investment income

     392,053        374,265        346,360        370,495   

Net realized (loss)

     (380,088     (589,965     (865,735     (2,722,463
                                

Total revenues

     2,139,231        1,825,770        1,541,987        (214,857
                                

Net income (loss)

   $ (466,073   $ (919,173   $ (1,022,165   $ 1,773,628   

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share

   $ (0.62   $ (1.23   $ (1.37   $ 2.37   

 

12. SEGMENT INFORMATION

 

AmerInst has three operating segments: 1) reinsurance activity, 2) RINITS™, its insurance financing product, which is in the marketing phase of development, and 3) insurance activity under the Agency Agreement. The insurance segment was identified as a new segment effective September 25, 2009 following the finalization of the Agency Agreement between APSL and C&F.

 

The results for the reinsurance activity were as follows:

 

             2009                     2008          

Revenues

   $ 6,439,547      $ 5,292,131   

Total losses and expenses

     (238,891     5,458,169   

Segment income (loss)

     6,678,438        (166,038

 

50


Table of Contents

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The RINITS™ segment offers a mechanism to securitize insurance and reinsurance risk, involving property, casualty, life and health lines of insurance. This segment as of December 31, 2009, had generated no revenue. Operating and management expenses are as follows:

 

             2009                    2008        

Operating and management expenses, being segment loss

   $ 155,813    $ 467,745

 

The insurance segment offers accountants’ professional liability and lawyers’ professional liability insurance coverage. This segment as of December 31, 2009, had generated no revenue. Operating and management expenses are as follows:

 

             2009                    2008        

Operating and management expenses, being segment loss

   $ 771,088    $ —  

 

The combined total net income (loss) for all three segments is as follows:

 

             2009                    2008          

Total net income (loss)

   $ 5,751,537    $ (633,783

 

13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

In December 2009, APSL entered into a non-cancellable operating lease for office space in Lisle, Illinois. The lease is renewable at the option of the lessee under certain conditions. Future lease payments for the years ended December 31 are as follows:

 

2010

   $ 39,544

2011

     54,043

2012

     55,801

2013

     57,558

2014

     14,150
      
   $ 221,096
      

 

51


Table of Contents

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

There have been no changes in, or disagreements with, accountants on accounting and financial disclosure. Our retention of Deloitte & Touche has been ratified by our Audit Committee and our shareholders. There have been no disagreements with Deloitte & Touche with respect to any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure.

 

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

 

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

As of December 31, 2009, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and our Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based upon that evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

 

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

Management of the Company (together with its consolidated subsidiaries) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness, as of December 31, 2009, of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, based on the framework established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework Issued by the Committee Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our assessment under that framework, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective at the reasonable level described below as of December 31, 2009.

 

Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by or under the supervision of our principal executive and principal financial officers to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.

 

There has been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting identified in the evaluation that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

 

Item 9B. Other Information

 

None

 

52


Table of Contents

PART III

 

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

The information required by Item 10 of Form 10-K with respect to identification of directors and officers is incorporated by reference from the information contained in the section captioned “Election of Directors” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 10, 2010 (the “Proxy Statement”), a copy of which we intend to file with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The company has two executive officers, one of which is a director of the Company.

 

Code of Ethics

 

We have a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer and our principal accounting officer. You can find our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on our internet site, www.amerinst.bm. We will post any amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and any waivers that are required to be disclosed by the rules of the SEC on our internet site.

 

Section 16 Compliance

 

Information appearing under the caption “Other Matters—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Audit Committee

 

Information appearing under the captions “Election of Directors—Meetings and Committees of the Board” and “—Report of the Audit Committee” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 11. Executive Compensation

 

The information required by Item 11 of the Form 10-K is incorporated by reference from the information contained in the section captioned “Election of Directors—Executive and Director Compensation” in the Proxy Statement.

 

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters

 

The information required by Item 12 of Form 10-K is incorporated by reference from the information contained in the section captioned “Other Matters—Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Proxy Statement.

 

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 

The information required by Item 13 of Form 10-K is incorporated by reference from the information contained in the sections captioned “Other Matters—Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Election of Directors” in the Proxy Statement.

 

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 

The information required by Item 14 of Form 10-K is incorporated by reference from the information in the section captioned “Appointment of Auditors” in the Proxy Statement.

 

53


Table of Contents

PART IV

 

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

(a)(1) See Index to Financial Statements and Schedules on page 31.

 

(a)(2) See Index to Financial Statements and Schedules on page 31.

 

(a)(3) See Index to Exhibits set forth on pages 56 – 57.

 

(b) See Index to Exhibits.

 

(c) See Index to Financial Statements and Schedules on page 31.

 

INVESTMENTS—SCHEDULE I

 

AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd.

 

Consolidated Summary of Investments

as of December 31, 2009

 

Type of investment

   Cost (1)    Fair Value    Amount at which
shown on the
Balance Sheet

Fixed maturity investments:

        

Bonds:

        

United States government and agencies and authorities

   $ 3,025,655    $ 3,033,905    $ 3,033,905

States, municipalities and political subdivisions

     5,862,796      5,986,075      5,986,075

Corporate

     506,517      528,461      528,461
                    

Total fixed maturities

     9,394,968      9,548,441      9,548,441
                    

Equities:

        

Common stocks:

        

Bank, trust and insurance companies

     2,157,160      3,624,195      3,624,195

Hedge fund, industrial, miscellaneous and all other

     8,985,808      13,976,353      13,976,353
                    

Total equity securities

     11,142,968      17,600,548      17,600,548
                    

Total investments

   $ 20,537,936    $ 27,148,989    $ 27,148,989
                    

 

(1) Adjusted cost of equity securities, taking in to account other than temporary impairment charges, and, as to fixed maturities, original cost reduced by repayments and adjusted for amortization of premiums or accrual of discounts.

 

54


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

Dated: March 29, 2010

   

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

   

By:

  /S/    STUART H. GRAYSTON        
     

Stuart H. Grayston,

President (Principal Executive Officer)

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Name

  

Title

 

Date

/S/    STUART H. GRAYSTON        

Stuart H. Grayston

  

President and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

  March 29, 2010

/S/    THOMAS MCMAHON        

Thomas McMahon

  

Vice-President, Treasurer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

  March 29, 2010

/S/    IRVIN F. DIAMOND        

Irvin F. Diamond

  

Director and Chairman of the Board

  March 29, 2010

/S/    JEROME A. HARRIS        

Jerome A. Harris

  

Director and Vice-Chairman of the Board

  March 29, 2010

/S/    JEFFRY I. GILLMAN        

Jeffry I. Gillman

  

Director

  March 29, 2010

/S/    DAVID R. KLUNK        

David R. Klunk

  

Director

  March 29, 2010

/S/    THOMAS P. LILLIE        

Thomas P. Lillie

  

Director

  March 29, 2010

/S/    DAVID N. THOMPSON        

David N. Thompson

  

Director

  March 29, 2010

 

55


Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

 

Year ended December 31, 2009

 

Exhibit

Number

 

Description

3(i)   Memorandum of Association of AmerInst Insurance Group Ltd. (“AmerInst” or the “Company”) (1)
3(ii)   Bye-laws of the Company (1)
4.1   Section 47 of the Company’s Bye-laws—included in Exhibit 3(ii) above
4.2   Statement of Share Ownership Policy, as Amended (2)
10.1   Reinsurance Treaty between AmerInst Insurance Company, Inc. (“AIIC”) and Virginia Surety Company, Inc. (3)
10.2   Agreement between Country Club Bank and AIIC (3)
10.3   Agreement between Country Club Bank and AmerInst Insurance Group, Inc. (“AMIG”) (3)
10.4   Revised Management Agreement between Vermont Insurance Management, Inc. and AIIC dated May 1, 1997(4), Addenda to Management Agreement dated July 1, 1997 (5), Addenda to Management Agreement dated July 1, 1998 (6), Management Agreement between USA Offshore Management, Ltd. and AmerInst Insurance Company Ltd. (“AMIC Ltd.”) dated as of December 2, 1999 (7), and Addenda to Agreement between AmerInst Insurance Company Ltd. and USA Offshore Management, Ltd. dated June 2, 2000 (7).
10.5   Escrow Agreement among AIIC, United States Fire Insurance Company and Harris Trust and Savings Bank dated March 7, 1995 (8)
10.6   Security Trust Agreement among AIIC, Harris Trust and Savings Bank and Virginia Surety Company, Inc. dated March 9, 1995 (9) and Agreement of Resignation, Appointment and Acceptance by and among AMIC Ltd., Harris Trust and Savings Bank and The Bank of New York dated as of May 8, 2000 (13)
10.7   Investment Advisory Agreement For Discretionary Accounts between Amerinst Insurance Company and Harris Associates L.P. dated as of January 22, 1996, as amended by the Amendment to Investment Advisory Agreement for Discretionary Accounts dated as of April 2, 1996 (1)
10.8   Exchange Agreement between the Company and AMIG, dated as of January 20, 1999 (1)
10.9   Investment Counsel Agreement between AMIC Ltd. and Northwest Investment Management, Inc. dated August 1, 2000 (9)
10.10   Registrar and Transfer Agent Agreement between the Company and Butterfield Corporate Services Limited dated as of January 1, 2001 (10)
10.11   Reinsurance Placement Slip between AMIC Ltd. and Professionals Direct Insurance Company (PDIC) effective January 1, 2003 (11)
10.12   Director Compensation Summary (12)
10.13   Management Agreement between USA Risk Group (Bermuda), Ltd., Cedar Management Limited and AMIC Ltd. dated July 1, 2008 (12)
10.14   Addenda to Management Agreement between USA Risk Group (Bermuda), Ltd., Cedar Management Limited and AMIC Ltd. effective July 1, 2008 (12)
10.15   Addendum to Management Agreement between USA Risk Group (Bermuda), Ltd., Cedar Management Limited and AMIC Ltd. effective January 1, 2010

 

56


Table of Contents

Exhibit

Number

  

Description

10.16    Employment Agreement effective November 24, 2009 between AmerInst Professional Services, Limited and F. Kyle Nieman III effective November 24, 2009
10.17    Agency Agreement effective September 25, 2009 between AmerInst Professional Services, Limited, The North River Insurance Company, United States Fire Insurance Company, Crum & Forster Indemnity Company, Crum and Forster Insurance Company, and Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company (13)
10.18    Professional Liability Quota Share Agreement dated September 25, 2009 between AmerInst Insurance Company, Ltd., The North River Insurance Company, United States Fire Insurance Company, Crum & Forster Indemnity Company, Crum and Forster Insurance Company, and Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company (13)(14)
21    Subsidiaries of the Registrant
31.1    Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2    Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1    Certification of Stuart Grayston pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2    Certification of Thomas McMahon pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

(1) Filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration No. 333-64929 and incorporated herein by reference.
(2) Filed with the Company’s Current Annual Report on Form 8 dated December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
(3) Filed with AMIG’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992 and incorporated herein by reference.
(4) Filed with AMIG’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference.
(5) Filed with AMIG’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference.
(6) Filed with AMIG’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference.
(7) Filed with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.
(8) Filed with AMIG’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1995 and incorporated herein by reference.
(9) Filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.
(10) Filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference.
(11) Filed with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.
(12) Filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
(13) Filed with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.
(14) Certain provisions are subject to a Request for Confidential Treatment.

 

57