Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-23.1 - NORTH CENTRAL BANCSHARES INC | v176963_ex23-1.htm |
EX-31.2 - NORTH CENTRAL BANCSHARES INC | v176963_ex31-2.htm |
EX-31.1 - NORTH CENTRAL BANCSHARES INC | v176963_ex31-1.htm |
EX-32.2 - NORTH CENTRAL BANCSHARES INC | v176963_ex32-2.htm |
EX-99.1 - NORTH CENTRAL BANCSHARES INC | v176963_ex99-1.htm |
EX-21.1 - NORTH CENTRAL BANCSHARES INC | v176963_ex21-1.htm |
EX-32.1 - NORTH CENTRAL BANCSHARES INC | v176963_ex32-1.htm |
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
DC 20549
FORM
10-K
(Mark
One)
x
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
|
|
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934: For the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009
|
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
|
|
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934: For the transition period
from _______
to _______
|
Commission
File No. 0-27672
NORTH
CENTRAL BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Iowa
|
42-1449849
|
(State
of incorporation)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
825
Central Avenue
|
|
Fort
Dodge, Iowa
|
50501
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code (515)
576-7531
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
|
Name of each exchange on which
registered
|
|
Common
Stock, par value $0.01 per share
|
|
The
NASDAQ Stock Market,
LLC
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: N/A
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes o No x
Indicated
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one)
Large
Accelerated Filer o
|
Accelerated
Filer o
|
Non-Accelerated
Filer o (Do
not check if smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller
Reporting Company x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 2b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
The
aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant, computed by reference to the average bid and asked prices of the
common stock as of June 30, 2009 was $16,957,000.
As of
March 12, 2010, there were issued and outstanding 1,348,448 shares of the
registrant’s common stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY
REFERENCE
1.
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the registrant’s 2010 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders are incorporated by reference to Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and Item 14
of Part III hereof.
2.
Portions of the 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders are incorporated by reference
to Items 5, 6, 7, 7A and 8 of Part II hereof.
Table
of Contents
|
||
PART
I
|
||
Item
1
|
Business
|
2
|
Item
1A
|
Risk
Factors
|
32
|
Item
1B
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
37
|
Item
2
|
Properties
|
38
|
Item
3
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
39
|
Item
4
|
Reserved
|
39
|
PART
II
|
||
Item
5
|
Market
For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
39
|
Item
6
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
39
|
Item
7
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation
|
39
|
Item
7A
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
39
|
Item
8
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
39
|
Item
9
|
Changes
in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
|
39
|
Item
9A(T)
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
40
|
Item
9B
|
Other
Information
|
40
|
PART
III
|
||
Item
10
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
41
|
Item
11
|
Executive
Compensation
|
41
|
Item
12
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
|
41
|
Item
13
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
41
|
Item
14
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
42
|
PART
IV
|
||
Item
15
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules
|
43
|
PART
I
North
Central Bancshares, Inc. and First Federal Savings Bank of Iowa (the “Bank”) may
from time to time make written or oral “forward-looking statements.” These
forward-looking statements may be contained in this annual filing on Form 10-K
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the Annual Report to
Shareholders, and in other communications by the Company and the Bank, which are
made in good faith pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words “may,” “could,” “should,”
“would,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan” and
similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
As used in this Form 10-K, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “North Central” and
“Company” mean North Central Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including
the Bank, on a consolidated basis (unless the context indicates another
meaning).
Forward-looking
statements include statements with respect to the Company’s beliefs, plans,
objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, estimates and intentions that
are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. The following factors, many
of which are subject to change based on various other factors beyond the
Company’s control, and other factors discussed in this Form 10-K, as well as
other factors identified in the Company’s filings with the SEC and those
presented elsewhere by management from time to time, could cause its financial
performance to differ materially from the plans, objectives, expectations,
estimates and intentions expressed in such forward-looking
statements:
|
·
|
developments
impacting the financial services industry and global credit markets, and
the response of legislators and regulators
thereto;
|
|
·
|
new
laws and regulations aimed at stimulating the economy and mitigating the
effects of the current global economic
crisis;
|
|
·
|
the
impact of special assessments by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(the “FDIC”);
|
|
·
|
developments
at other companies in our industry, including the potential failure of
other financial institutions;
|
|
·
|
the
strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the
local economies in which we conduct
operations;
|
|
·
|
changes
in consumer spending and saving
habits;
|
|
·
|
the
strength of our loan portfolio, including potential defaults by borrowers
and our realization of amounts below the amounts we are due on certain
loans;
|
|
·
|
impairments
to the value of investment securities held by
us;
|
|
·
|
the
effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws,
including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve (the “Federal Reserve”);
|
|
·
|
inflation,
interest rate, market and monetary
fluctuations;
|
|
·
|
our
ability to attract and retain key personnel to implement our strategy and
oversee our operations;
|
|
·
|
the
impact of changes in financial services’ laws and regulations (including
laws concerning taxes, banking, securities and
insurance);
|
|
·
|
our
success in gaining regulatory approval of products and services, when
required;
|
|
·
|
the
timely development of and acceptance of new products and services and the
perceived overall value of these products and services by users, including
the features, pricing and quality compared to competitors’ products and
services;
|
|
·
|
the
willingness of users to substitute competitors’ products and services for
our products and services;
|
|
·
|
our
ability to attract funds and raise capital when needed to support growth
or ongoing operations;
|
|
·
|
our
previous expansion into new market areas and the associated costs may
reduce our profitability;
|
|
·
|
the
availability of desirable avenues to deploy our existing
capital;
|
|
·
|
our
success at managing the risks involved in our business, including our
ability to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial
reporting;
|
|
·
|
limitations
imposed on us by our articles of incorporation and bylaws which could
restrict our ability to pursue growth opportunities;
and
|
|
·
|
limitations
imposed on us by virtue of the agreements we entered into with the United
States Treasury in connection with our participation in the Troubled Asset
Relief Program Capital Purchase Program (including any potential changes
to these agreements required to comply with changes in applicable Federal
laws).
|
This list
of important factors is not exclusive. The Company or the Bank does not
undertake to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that
may be made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company or the
Bank.
- 1
-
ITEM
1.
|
BUSINESS
|
General
North Central Bancshares, Inc., an Iowa
corporation, is the holding company for First Federal Savings Bank of Iowa, a
federally chartered savings bank. The Company owns 100% of the outstanding
stock of the Bank. The Company’s stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global
Market under the symbol “FFFD.”
The Company conducts business as a
unitary savings and loan holding company and the principal business of the
Company consists of the operation of the Bank. The Company’s executive
offices are located at the home office of the Company at 825 Central Avenue,
Fort Dodge, Iowa. The Company’s telephone number is (515)
576-7531.
First
Federal Savings Bank of Iowa
The Bank is a federally-chartered
savings bank that conducts its operations from its main office located in Fort
Dodge, Iowa and ten other branch offices located in Iowa. Eight of the
Bank’s offices are located in north central and central Iowa, in the cities of
Fort Dodge (2), Nevada, Ames, Perry, Ankeny, Clive and West Des Moines.
Three of the Bank’s offices are located in southeast Iowa, in the cities of
Burlington (2) and Mount Pleasant. The Bank is the successor to First Federal
Savings and Loan Association of Fort Dodge, which was originally chartered in
1954, and on May 7, 1987 became a federally chartered savings bank. The
Bank adopted its present name on February 27, 1998. The Bank is a
community-oriented savings institution that is primarily engaged in the business
of attracting deposits from the general public in the Bank’s market areas, and
investing such deposits in one-to-four family residential real estate mortgages,
multifamily and commercial mortgages and consumer loans, with emphasis on second
mortgage loans. The Bank’s deposits are insured by the FDIC. The
Bank has been a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) system since
1954. At December 31, 2009, the Bank had total assets of $455.0 million,
total deposits of $334.8 million, and total shareholders’ equity of $48.3
million.
The Bank’s principal executive office
is located at 825 Central Avenue, Fort Dodge, Iowa and its telephone number at
that address is (515) 576-7531. The Bank’s website address is www.firstfederaliowa.com.
Information on the website shall not be considered a part of this Form
10-K.
Market
Area and Competition
The Company is a savings and loan
holding company serving its primary market area of Webster, Story, Des Moines,
Dallas, Polk, and Henry Counties, which are located in the central, north
central and southeastern parts of the State of Iowa. The Company’s market
area is influenced by agriculture, manufacturing, retail sales, insurance,
financial and other professional services and public education. The
Company is headquartered in Fort Dodge, the Webster County seat, where it also
operates two branch offices.
The year 2009 was an extremely
challenging one for the financial industry and the entire world economy.
The financial crisis and recession also impacted the local economies in the
Company’s market area. The unemployment rate for the month of December
2009 for Webster County was 7.9%, for Story County 4.6%, for Dallas County 5.6%,
for Polk County 6.5%, for Henry County 8.8% and for Des Moines County
9.0%. These compare to the national rate of 10.0% and the State of Iowa
rate of 6.6%.
Due to the type of loan demand in the
Company’s overall market area, increased competition, and the Company’s decision
to diversify its loan portfolio, the Company has originated and purchased loans
(primarily one-to-four family, multifamily and commercial real estate loans)
from outside the State of Iowa. The Company intends to continue such
originations and purchases pursuant to its underwriting standards for
Company-originated loans.
- 2
-
The Company encounters strong
competition both in attracting deposits and in originating real estate and other
loans. Its most direct competition for deposits has historically come from
commercial and savings banks and credit unions in its market area. Competition
for loans comes from such financial institutions as well as mortgage banking
companies. The Company expects continued strong competition in the foreseeable
future. Many such institutions have greater financial and marketing
resources available to them than does the Company. The Company competes
for savings deposits by offering depositors a high level of personal service and
a wide range of competitively priced financial products. In recent years,
additional strong competition has come from stock and bond dealers and brokers
and, in particular, mutual funds. The Company competes for real estate
loans primarily through the interest rates and loan fees it charges and
advertising, as well as by offering high levels of personal
service.
Lending
Activities
Loan Portfolio
Composition. The principal components of the Company’s loan
portfolio are fixed-rate and adjustable-rate first mortgage loans secured
primarily by one-to-four family owner-occupied residential real estate, fixed-
and adjustable-rate first mortgage loans secured by multifamily residential and
commercial real estate and secured and unsecured consumer loans, with emphasis
on second mortgage real estate loans. At December 31, 2009, the Company’s
total loans receivable was $383.2 million, of which $151.6 million, or 39.6%,
were one-to-four family residential real estate first mortgage loans, $63.5
million, or 16.6%, were multifamily real estate first mortgage loans, primarily
purchased by the Company, $84.6 million, or 22.1%, were commercial real estate
first mortgage loans, primarily purchased by the Company, and $7.8 million, or
2.0%, were construction real estate loans. Consumer loans, consisting
primarily of second mortgage loans and automobile loans, totaled $75.7 million,
or 19.7%, of the Company’s loan portfolio.
Loans to One Borrower.
Savings associations, such as the Bank, are generally subject to
the same limits on loans to one borrower as are imposed on national banks.
Generally, under these limits, a savings association may not make a loan or
extend credit to a single or related group of borrowers in excess of 15% of the
association’s unimpaired capital and surplus. Additional amounts may be
lent, in the aggregate not exceeding 10% of unimpaired capital and surplus, if
any such loan or extension of credit is fully secured by readily-marketable
collateral. Such collateral is defined to include certain debt and equity
securities, but generally does not include real estate. At December 31,
2009, it was the Company’s policy to limit loans to one borrower to $5.0
million, with higher limits subject to board approval. At December 31,
2009, it was the Company’s policy to limit loans to related entities, corporate
groups, or common guarantors to $10.0 million. These limitations are less
than regulatory requirements. At December 31, 2009, the Company’s largest
aggregate outstanding loans to a single borrower or group of related borrowers
totaled $5.5 million. At December 31, 2009, the Company had one other
lending relationship of over $4.0 million.
- 3
-
Analysis of Loan
Portfolio. Set forth below are selected data relating to the
composition of the Company’s loan portfolio by type of loan as of the dates
indicated:
At December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percent
|
Percent
|
Percent
|
Percent
|
Percent
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
of Total
|
Amount
|
of Total
|
Amount
|
of Total
|
Amount
|
of Total
|
Amount
|
of Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
First
mortgage loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One-to-four
family residential
|
$ | 151,550 | 39.55 | % | $ | 170,184 | 41.83 | % | $ | 195,586 | 43.23 | % | $ | 214,499 | 47.31 | % | $ | 201,242 | 45.88 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Multifamily
|
63,470 | 16.57 | 57,968 | 14.25 | 56,587 | 12.51 | 65,807 | 14.52 | 73,946 | 16.86 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
84,595 | 22.08 | 91,978 | 22.61 | 109,186 | 24.13 | 95,508 | 21.07 | 81,255 | 18.52 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction
|
7,853 | 2.05 | 8,447 | 2.08 | 17,385 | 3.84 | 12,091 | 2.67 | 21,192 | 4.83 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
first mortgage loans
|
307,468 | 80.25 | 328,577 | 80.77 | 378,744 | 83.71 | 387,905 | 85.57 | 377,635 | 86.09 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automobiles
|
$ | 14,777 | 3.86 | $ | 14,106 | 3.47 | $ | 12,667 | 2.80 | $ | 10,459 | 2.31 | $ | 9,252 | 2.11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Second
mortgage
|
55,824 | 14.57 | 58,001 | 14.26 | 54,586 | 12.06 | 49,070 | 10.82 | 44,218 | 10.08 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
5,088 | 1.33 | 6,099 | 1.50 | 6,460 | 1.43 | 5,901 | 1.30 | 7,545 | 1.72 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
consumer loans
|
75,689 | 19.75 | 78,206 | 19.23 | 73,713 | 16.29 | 65,430 | 14.43 | 61,015 | 13.91 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
loans receivable
|
$ | 383,157 | 100.00 | % | $ | 406,783 | 100.00 | % | $ | 452,457 | 100.00 | % | $ | 453,335 | 100.00 | % | $ | 438,650 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undisbursed
portion of construction loans
|
$ | 1,005 | 0.26 | % | $ | 840 | 0.21 | % | $ | 2,364 | 0.52 | % | $ | 1,217 | 0.27 | % | $ | 5,666 | 1.29 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unearned
loan (premium) discount
|
(155 | ) | (0.04 | ) | (347 | ) | (0.09 | ) | (370 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (583 | ) | (0.13 | ) | (769 | ) | (0.18 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
deferred loan origination fees (costs)
|
281 | 0.07 | 124 | 0.03 | 119 | 0.03 | 165 | 0.04 | 149 | 0.03 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
7,171 | 1.87 | 5,379 | 1.32 | 3,487 | 0.77 | 3,493 | 0.77 | 3,326 | 0.76 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
loans receivable, net
|
$ | 374,855 | 97.83 | % | $ | 400,787 | 98.53 | % | $ | 446,857 | 98.76 | % | $ | 449,043 | 99.05 | % | $ | 430,278 | 98.10 | % |
- 4
-
Loan Maturity Schedule.
The following table sets forth the contractual maturity of the Company’s loan
portfolio at December 31, 2009. Overdraft lines of credit are reported as
due within one year.
At December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Within
|
1-5
|
Beyond 5
|
||||||||||||||
1 Year
|
Years
|
Years
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
First
mortgage loans:
|
||||||||||||||||
One-to-four
family residential
|
$ | 2,049 | $ | 6,159 | $ | 143,342 | $ | 151,550 | ||||||||
Multifamily
|
1,584 | 8,788 | 53,098 | 63,470 | ||||||||||||
Commercial
|
11,504 | 28,016 | 45,075 | 84,595 | ||||||||||||
Construction
|
7,853 | - | - | 7,853 | ||||||||||||
Consumer
loans
|
5,951 | 41,643 | 28,095 | 75,689 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 28,941 | $ | 84,606 | $ | 269,610 | $ | 383,157 |
The following table sets forth the
dollar amounts of all fixed rate and adjustable rate loans in each loan category
at December 31, 2009 due after December 31, 2010.
Due After December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||
Fixed
|
Adjustable
|
Total
|
||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||
First
mortgage loans:
|
||||||||||||
One-to-four
family residential
|
$ | 33,621 | $ | 115,880 | $ | 149,501 | ||||||
Multifamily
|
7,958 | 53,928 | 61,886 | |||||||||
Commercial
|
27,640 | 45,451 | 73,091 | |||||||||
Consumer
loans
|
58,035 | 11,703 | 69,738 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 127,254 | $ | 226,962 | $ | 354,216 |
One-to-four family Residential Real
Estate Loans. Traditionally, the Company’s primary lending activity
consists of the origination of fixed- and adjustable-rate one-to-four family
owner-occupied residential first mortgage loans, substantially all of which are
collateralized by properties located in the Company’s market area. The
Company also originates one-to-four family, interest-only construction loans
that convert to permanent loans after an initial construction period that
typically runs up to twelve months. At December 31, 2009, 23.2% of the
Company’s residential real estate loans had fixed rates, and 76.8% had
adjustable rates.
The Company originates loans for
portfolio and sells loans in the secondary mortgage market. However, the
Company’s one-to-four family, fixed-rate, residential real estate loans
originated for portfolio are generally originated and underwritten according to
standards that qualify such loans to be included in Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae
purchase and guarantee programs and that otherwise permit resale in the
secondary mortgage market. The Company has sold fixed-rate loans with
maturities of 15 years or greater in the secondary mortgage market. For
the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company sold $69.6 million of one-to-four
family residential mortgage loans, generally to lower the Company’s interest
rate risk. One-to-four family portfolio loans are originated and
underwritten according to policies approved by our board of
directors.
Originations of one-to-four family
fixed-rate first mortgage loans are monitored on an ongoing basis and are
affected significantly by the level of market interest rates, the Company’s
interest rate gap position and loan products offered by the Company’s
competitors. The Company’s one-to-four family fixed-rate first mortgage
loans amortize on a monthly basis with principal and interest due each
month. The Company also offers one-to-four family adjustable-rate first
mortgage loans that convert to adjustable-rate loans that adjust on an annual
basis after the initial fixed rate term. The initial fixed rate term of
these loans are primarily 5 and 7 years and the overall maturity of these loans
may be up to 30 years. The Company determines whether a customer qualifies
for these loans based upon the initial fixed interest rate.
- 5
-
The Company establishes various annual
and life-of-the-loan caps on ARM loan interest rate adjustments. At
December 31, 2009, the Company generally offered ARM loans with annual rate caps
of 2.00% and maximum life-of-loan caps of 6.00% above the initial interest
rate. At present, the interest rate on the Company’s ARM loans are
calculated by using the weekly average yield on United States Treasury
Securities adjusted to a constant maturity of one year. In addition, the
Company establishes floors for each loan originated below which the loan may not
adjust. One-to-four family residential ARM loans totaled $108.5 million, or
28.3%, of the Company’s total loan portfolio at December 31, 2009.
The primary purpose of offering ARM
loans is to make the Company’s loan portfolio more interest rate
sensitive. ARM loans carry increased credit risk associated with
potentially higher monthly payments by borrowers as general market interest
rates increase. It is possible, therefore, that during periods of rising
interest rates, the risk of default on ARM loans may increase due to the upward
adjustment of interest costs to the borrower. Management believes that the
Company’s credit risk associated with its ARM loans is reduced because of the
annual and lifetime interest rate adjustment limitations on such loans, although
such limitations do create an element of interest rate risk. See
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations – Discussion of Market Risk – Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis” in
the 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is included as Exhibit 13.1 to
this Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference.
The Company’s one-to-four family
residential first mortgage loans customarily include due-on-sale clauses, which
are provisions giving the Company the right to declare a loan immediately due
and payable in the event, among other things, that the borrower sells or
otherwise disposes of the underlying real property serving as security for the
loan. Due-on-sale clauses are an important means of adjusting the rates on
the Company’s fixed rate mortgage loan portfolio, and the Company has generally
exercised its rights under these clauses.
Regulations limit the amount that a
savings association may lend relative to the appraised value of the real estate
securing the loan, as determined by an appraisal at the time of loan
origination. The Company originates one-to-four family residential
mortgage loans with terms up to a maximum of 30 years and with loan-to-value
ratios up to 96.5% of the lesser of the appraised value of the security property
or the contract price. The Company generally requires that private
mortgage insurance be obtained in an amount sufficient to reduce the Company’s
exposure to be at or below the 80% loan-to-value level. The Company
requires fire and casualty insurance, flood insurance, where applicable, an
abstract of title, and a title opinion or title insurance on all properties
securing real estate loans originated by the Company.
Multifamily Residential and
Commercial Real Estate Loans. The Company’s loan portfolio contains
loans secured by multifamily residential and commercial real estate. Such loans
constituted approximately $148.1 million, or 38.6%, of the Company’s total loan
portfolio at December 31, 2009. Of such loans, $100.0 million, or 67.5%,
were purchased or originated by the Company and were secured by properties
outside the State of Iowa. The multifamily and commercial real estate
loans are primarily secured by multifamily residences such as apartment
buildings and by commercial facilities such as office buildings and retail
buildings. Multifamily residential and commercial real estate loans are
offered with fixed and adjustable rates and are structured in a number of
different ways depending upon the circumstances of the borrower and the type of
project. See “-Purchased or Out of State Originated Loans.”
All purchased or out of state
originated multifamily or commercial real estate loans in excess of $1.0 million
are approved by the Company’s Senior Management Loan Committee and the board of
directors and are generally subject to the same underwriting standards as for
loans originated by the Company. All out of state originated loans less
than $1.0 million are approved by the Company’s Senior Management Loan Committee
and ratified by the board of directors and are subject to the same underwriting
standards as loans originated by the Company. Before a loan is purchased,
the Company obtains copies of the original loan application, title insurance
policy, appraisal and personal financial statements of any guarantors of the
loan, and certified rent rolls. An executive officer of the Company also makes a
personal inspection of the property securing the loan. Such purchases are made
without recourse to the seller. At December 31, 2009, $19.7 million, or 19.7%,
of out of state multifamily and commercial real estate loans were serviced by
the Bank. At December 31, 2009, $80.3 million, or 80.3%, of the out of
state multifamily and commercial real estate loans were serviced by the
originating financial institution, mortgage company or alternate servicing
financial institution. The Company imposes a $3.0 million limit on the
aggregate size of multifamily and commercial loans to any one borrower for loans
secured by real estate located outside the State of Iowa and a $5.0 million
limit on the aggregate size of multifamily and commercial loans to one borrower
applied to loans secured by real estate located in Iowa. The Company also
imposes a $3.0 million and $4.0 million loan limit per secured property located
outside and inside the State of Iowa, respectively. Any exceptions to
these limits must be specifically approved by the board of directors on a
loan-by-loan basis within the Company’s legal lending limit. See
“Regulation – Regulation of Federal Savings Associations – Loans to One
Borrower.”
- 6
-
Loans secured by multifamily and
commercial real estate generally involve a greater degree of credit risk than
single-family residential mortgage loans and such loans also typically have
larger loan balances. This increased credit risk is a result of several factors,
including the concentration of principal in a limited number of loans and
borrowers, the effects of general economic conditions on income producing
properties, and the increased difficulty of evaluating and monitoring these
types of loans. Furthermore, the repayment of loans secured by multifamily and
commercial real estate is typically dependent upon the successful operation of
the related real estate property. If the cash flow from such real estate
projects is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be
impaired. As a result, these types of loans present greater potential loan
delinquencies and loan losses than single-family residential loans.
Construction Lending.
The Company makes construction loans to individuals for the construction
of their residences as well as to builders for the construction of one-to-four
family residences and commercial and multifamily real estate. At December
31, 2009, the Company’s construction loan portfolio totaled $7.8 million, or
2.0%, of the Company’s total loan portfolio. Construction loans to
individuals for their residences are structured to be converted to permanent
loans at the end of the construction phase, which typically runs up to twelve
months. These construction loans have rates and terms which generally
match the one-to-four family ARM loan rates then offered by the Company, except
that during the construction phase the borrower pays interest only.
Generally, the maximum loan-to-value ratio of owner occupied single family
construction loans is 80% of appraised value. Residential construction
loans are generally underwritten pursuant to the same guidelines used for
originating permanent residential loans.
Generally, construction loans to
builders of one-to-four family residences require the payment of interest only
with terms of up to 12 months. These loans may also provide for the
payment of interest and loan fees from loan proceeds and carry adjustable rates
of interest. At December 31, 2009, the Company had $3.7 million of
one-to-four family construction loans of which $1.3 million was
nonperforming.
Construction loans on commercial and
multifamily real estate projects may be secured by apartments, small office
buildings, strip retail centers, or other property, and are generally structured
to be converted to permanent loans at the end of the construction phase, which
generally runs up to 12 months. During the construction phase the borrower
pays interest only. These loans generally provide for the payment of
interest and loan fees from loan proceeds. At December 31, 2009, the
Company had approximately $4.1 million of loans for the construction of
commercial real estate of which $3.0 million was nonperforming.
Construction loans are obtained
principally through continued business from builders who have previously
borrowed from the Company and from new or existing customers who are building
new facilities. The application process includes a submission to the
Company of accurate plans, specifications, and costs of the project to be
constructed and projected revenues from the project. These items are also
used as a basis to determine the appraised value of the subject property.
Loans are based on the lesser of the current appraised value of the property or
the cost of construction (land plus building).
Because of the uncertainties inherent
in estimating construction costs and the market for the project upon completion,
it is relatively difficult to evaluate accurately the total loan funds required
to complete a project, the related loan-to-value ratios and the likelihood of
ultimate success of the project. Construction loans to borrowers other
than owner-occupants also involve many of the same risks discussed above
regarding multifamily and commercial real estate loans and tend to be more
sensitive to general economic conditions than many other types of loans.
Also, the funding of loan fees and interest during the construction phase makes
the monitoring of the progress of the project particularly important, as
customary early warning signals of project difficulties may not be
present.
Consumer Loans, Including Second
Mortgage Loans. The Company also originates consumer loans, which
consists primarily of one-to-four family second mortgage loans, including home
equity lines of credit. As of December 31, 2009, consumer loans totaled $75.7
million, of which second mortgage loans totaled $55.8 million, or 14.6%, of the
Company’s total loan portfolio. The Company’s second mortgage loans generally
have fixed interest rates for terms of three to five years. The Company’s home
equity lines of credit are adjustable rate loans with terms up to ten
years. The Company’s second mortgage loans are generally secured by the
borrower’s principal residence with a maximum loan-to-value ratio, including the
principal balances of both the first and second mortgage loans, of generally no
more than 85%. In recent years the Company originated one-to-four family
second mortgage loans with a loan-to-value ratio of up to 100%; however during
2008 that limit was reduced to 95% and in 2009 the limit was further reduced to
85%. Generally, second mortgage loans in excess of 85% loan-to-value are
insured through a pool insurance product, unless the loan has secondary
collateral. These types of loans are subject to stricter underwriting
guidelines. As of December 31, 2009, the average principal amount of the
Company’s second mortgage loans was approximately $24,000.
- 7
-
To a lesser extent, the Company also
originates loans secured by automobiles, with fixed rates generally up to 100%
loan-to-value basis for new cars. All of the Company’s automobile loans were
originated by the Company and generally have terms of up to six years. At
December 31, 2009, automobile loans totaled $14.8 million, or 3.9%, of the
Company’s total loan portfolio.
In addition, the Company also makes
other types of consumer loans, including unsecured signature loans, for various
purposes. At December 31, 2009, other consumer loans totaled $5.1
million, or 1.3%, of the Company’s total loan portfolio. Included in other
consumer loans are unsecured consumer loans which totaled $1.1 million, or 0.3%,
of the Company’s total loan portfolio. The minimum loan amount for
unsecured signature loans is $2,000, the maximum loan amount for such loans is
generally $5,000, and the average balance of such loans is approximately
$2,400.
The Company originates a limited number
of commercial business loans, which the Company includes with its consumer loan
portfolio for reporting purposes. Such loans are generally secured and are
originated for any business purpose, such as for the purchase of business
equipment.
The Company’s business plan calls for
an increase in consumer lending for the foreseeable future, particularly second
mortgage lending. The Company expects consumer loan demand will come from its
existing customer base. Consumer loans generally provide for shorter terms and
higher yields as compared to residential first mortgage loans, but generally
carry higher risks of default. At December 31, 2009, $993,000 or 0.3%, of the
Company’s consumer loan portfolio was on non-accrual status.
Loan Originations, Solicitation,
Processing, and Commitments. Loan originations are derived from a number
of sources such as real estate agent referrals, existing customers, borrowers,
builders, and walk-in customers. Upon receiving a loan application, the Company
obtains a credit report and income information to verify specific information
relating to the applicant’s employment, income, and credit standing. In the case
of a real estate loan, an appraiser approved by the Company appraises the real
estate intended to collateralize the proposed loan. An underwriter in the
Company’s loan department reviews the loan application file for accuracy and
completeness, and verifies the information provided. Pursuant to the Company’s
written loan policies, at least one member of management approves all first
mortgage loans. The loan committee of the board of directors meets
quarterly to review a sampling of all loans originated in the previous three
months.
After a loan is approved, a loan
commitment letter is promptly issued to the borrower. The commitment letter
specifies the terms and conditions of the proposed loan including the amount of
the loan, interest rate, and amortization term, a brief description of the
required collateral, and required insurance coverage. Commitments are typically
issued for 60-day periods in the case of loans to refinance, loans to purchase
existing real estate, and construction loans. The borrower must provide proof of
fire and casualty insurance on the property serving as collateral, which
insurance must be maintained during the full term of the loan. At December 31,
2009, the Company had outstanding commitments to originate $1.4 million of
loans. This amount does not include commitments to purchase loans, undisbursed
overdraft loan privileges, undisbursed home equity lines of credit or the
unfunded portion of loans in process.
Purchased or Out of State Originated
Loans. At December 31, 2009, the Company’s loan portfolio contained
$111.8 million of loans secured by out of state properties. These
loans represented 29.2% of the Company’s total loan portfolio at December 31,
2009. All of the one-to-four family, multifamily residential and
commercial real estate loans in the Company’s loan portfolio which are purchased
out of state by the Company are without recourse to the seller. At
December 31, 2009, the Company’s out of state multifamily residential and
commercial real estate loans had an average balance of $769,000 and the largest
loan had a principal balance of $3.2 million. As of
December 31, 2009, there were two out of state commercial real estate
loans totaling $3.2 million that were more than 90 days past due.
To supplement its origination of
one-to-four family first mortgage loans, the Company also purchases first
mortgage loans secured by out of state one-to-four family residences. Due
to economic conditions during 2009, including the uncertainty surrounding real
estate values in other geographical areas, the Bank did not purchase any out of
market one-to-four residential real estate loans. At December 31, 2009,
$8.0 million, or 2.1%, of the Company’s total loan portfolio consisted of out of
state one-to-four family loans. As of December 31, 2009, there
was one out of state one-to-four family first mortgage loan totaling $1.5
million that was more than 90 days past due.
- 8
-
There are certain risks with loans
purchased by the Company that are not associated with loans the Company
originates. At December 31, 2009, $19.8 million, or 17.7%, of purchased
loans were serviced by the Bank. At December 31, 2009, $92.0 million, or
82.3%, of purchased loans were serviced by the originating financial
institution, mortgage company or alternate servicing financial
institution. Although the Company reviews each purchased loan using the
Company’s underwriting criteria for originations and a Company officer performs
an on-site inspection of each purchased multifamily and commercial real estate
loan, the Company is dependent on the servicer of the loan for ongoing
collection efforts and collateral review. In addition, the Company
purchases loans with a variety of terms, including maturities, interest rate
caps and indices for adjustment of interest rates that may differ from those
offered at the time by the Company in connection with loans the Company
originates. Finally, the market areas in which the properties which secure
the purchased loans are located are subject to economic and real estate market
conditions that may significantly differ from those experienced in the Company’s
market areas. If economic conditions continue to limit the Company’s
opportunities to originate loans in its market areas, the Company may increase
its investment in out of state mortgage loans. There can be no assurance,
however, that economic conditions in these out of state areas will not
deteriorate in the future resulting in increased loan delinquencies and loan
losses among the loans secured by property in these areas.
In an effort to reduce the risk of loss
on out of state purchased loans, the Company generally purchases loans that meet
the underwriting policies for loans originated by the Company although specific
rates and terms may differ from the rates and terms offered by the
Company. The Company requires appropriate documentation, and personal
inspections of the underlying real estate collateral by an executive officer
prior to purchase. The Company limits its out of state loan portfolio
concentration within a single state to 100% of the Bank’s risk based
capital. The Company also limits its loan portfolio concentration to a
single servicer to 100% of the Bank’s risk based capital.
- 9
-
Set forth below is a table of the
Company’s out of state purchased or originated loans by state of origin as of
December 31, 2009.
One-to-four
|
Multi-
|
Commercial
|
Land
|
Total Balance as of
|
Percentage as of
|
|||||||||||||||||||
State
|
Family
|
Family
|
Real Estate
|
Development
|
December 31, 2009
|
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arizona
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 2,751 | $ | - | $ | 2,751 | 2.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Arkansas
|
160 | - | - | - | 160 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
California
|
5,198 | 11,085 | 11,071 | - | 27,354 | 24.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Colorado
|
- | 6,201 | 1,026 | - | 7,227 | 6.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
District
of Columbia
|
1,500 | - | - | - | 1,500 | 1.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Florida
|
- | - | 276 | 3,000 | 3,276 | 2.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Illinois
|
- | 1,579 | 862 | - | 2,441 | 2.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Indiana
|
- | 1,076 | 397 | - | 1,473 | 1.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Kansas
|
- | - | 348 | - | 348 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Michigan
|
- | 2,093 | - | - | 2,093 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Minnesota
|
- | 2,320 | 806 | - | 3,126 | 2.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Missouri
|
963 | - | 3,574 | - | 4,537 | 4.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Nebraska
|
- | - | 5,338 | - | 5,338 | 4.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Nevada
|
- | - | 1,377 | - | 1,377 | 1.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
North
Carolina
|
52 | - | - | - | 52 | 0.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Ohio
|
- | 1,372 | - | - | 1,372 | 1.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Oregon
|
- | 2,510 | 2,298 | - | 4,808 | 4.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
South
Carolina
|
- | - | 4,521 | - | 4,521 | 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
South
Dakota
|
- | - | 2,455 | - | 2,455 | 2.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Texas
|
155 | - | 1,903 | - | 2,058 | 1.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Utah
|
- | - | 8,432 | - | 8,432 | 7.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Virginia
|
- | - | 1,188 | 744 | 1,932 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Washington
|
- | 11,924 | 1,689 | - | 13,613 | 12.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Wisconsin
|
- | 9,574 | - | - | 9,574 | 8.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 8,028 | $ | 49,734 | $ | 50,312 | $ | 3,744 | $ | 111,818 | 100.0 | % |
- 10
-
Origination, Purchase and Sale of
Loans. The table below shows the Company’s originations, purchases
and sales of loans for the periods indicated.
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Total
loans receivable at beginning of period
|
$ | 406,783 | $ | 452,457 | $ | 453,335 | ||||||
Originations:
|
||||||||||||
First
mortgage loans:
|
||||||||||||
One-to-four
family residential
|
91,783 | 52,200 | 55,106 | |||||||||
Multifamily
|
2,333 | 860 | 2,104 | |||||||||
Commercial
|
8,182 | 4,946 | 21,291 | |||||||||
Consumer
loans:
|
||||||||||||
Automobiles
|
8,801 | 9,849 | 10,518 | |||||||||
Second
mortgage
|
23,605 | 29,540 | 31,559 | |||||||||
Other
|
4,338 | 5,312 | 5,001 | |||||||||
Total
|
139,042 | 102,707 | 125,579 | |||||||||
Loan
Purchases:
|
||||||||||||
First
mortgage one-to-four family
|
- | - | 6,293 | |||||||||
First
mortgage multifamily
|
9,449 | 13,154 | 1,707 | |||||||||
First
mortgage commercial
|
5,313 | 5,430 | 32,591 | |||||||||
Loan
Sales:
|
||||||||||||
First
mortgage one-to-four family
|
(69,601 | ) | (41,823 | ) | (36,072 | ) | ||||||
First
mortgage commercial
|
- | - | (2,000 | ) | ||||||||
Transfer
of mortgage loans to foreclosed real estate
|
(2,647 | ) | (2,678 | ) | (2,360 | ) | ||||||
Repayments
|
(105,182 | ) | (122,464 | ) | (126,616 | ) | ||||||
Net
loan activity
|
(23,626 | ) | (45,674 | ) | (878 | ) | ||||||
Total
loans receivable at end of period
|
$ | 383,157 | $ | 406,783 | $ | 452,457 |
Loan Origination Fees and Other
Income. In addition to interest earned on loans, the Company generally
receives fees in connection with loan originations. Such loan origination fees,
net of costs to originate, are deferred and amortized using an interest method
over the contractual life of the loan. Net deferred fees and costs are
recognized into income immediately upon prepayment of the related loan. At
December 31, 2009, the Company had $281,000 of deferred loan origination fees,
net. Such fees vary with the type of loans and commitments made. The Company
typically charges a document preparation fee on fixed- and adjustable-rate first
mortgage loans.
Investment
Activities
At
December 31, 2009, the Company’s investment portfolio was comprised of state and
local obligations, mortgage-backed securities, U.S. Government agency
securities, interest-bearing deposits and equity securities consisting of mutual
funds, and Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock. During 2009, the Company
sold the remainder of the Freddie Mac preferred stock that it owned. At
December 31, 2009, $354,000 of the Company’s investment portfolio, excluding
mutual funds and FHLB stock, was scheduled to mature in one year or less, $1.6
million was scheduled to mature within one to five years, and $21.0 million was
scheduled to mature in more than five years.
Liquidity
levels may be increased or decreased depending upon the yields on investment
alternatives and upon management’s judgment as to the attractiveness of the
yields then available in relation to other opportunities and its expectation of
the level of yield that will be available in the future, as well as management’s
projections as to the short term demand for funds to be used in the Company’s
loan origination and other activities. In addition, the Company’s
liquidity levels are affected by the level and source of its borrowed
funds.
- 11
-
Investment
Portfolio. The following table sets forth the carrying value
of the Company’s investment portfolio at the dates indicated.
At December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Investment
securities
|
||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
$ | 11,165 | $ | 19,754 | $ | 2,191 | ||||||
State
and local obligations
|
4,326 | 1,772 | 2,770 | |||||||||
U.S.
government agency securities
|
7,476 | - | - | |||||||||
FHLB
stock
|
3,925 | 4,692 | 5,064 | |||||||||
Mutual
funds
|
207 | 1,230 | 1,938 | |||||||||
Equity
securities
|
- | 82 | 4,636 | |||||||||
Total
investment securities
|
27,099 | 27,530 | 16,599 | |||||||||
Interest-earning
deposits
|
12,805 | 6,564 | 3,132 | |||||||||
Total
investments
|
$ | 39,904 | $ | 34,094 | $ | 19,731 |
Investment Portfolio
Maturities. The following table sets forth the scheduled
maturities, market values and weighted average yields for the Company’s
investment portfolio at December 31, 2009.
At December 31,2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One Year or Less
|
One to Five Years
|
Five to Ten Years
|
Over Ten Years
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted
|
Weighted
|
Weighted
|
Weighted
|
Weighted
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair
|
Average
|
Fair
|
Average
|
Fair
|
Average
|
Fair
|
Average
|
Fair
|
Average
|
Life in
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value
|
Yield
|
Value
|
Yield
|
Value
|
Yield
|
Value
|
Yield
|
Value
|
Yield
|
Years
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment
securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
$ | 1 | 6.21 | % | $ | 33 | 5.90 | % | $ | 1,960 | 3.93 | % | $ | 9,171 | 3.67 | % | $ | 11,165 | 3.72 | % | 3.32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
State
and local obligations (1)
|
353 | 4.26 | 1,087 | 2.89 | 2,372 | 4.26 | 514 | 4.15 | 4,326 | 3.90 | 5.74 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S.
government agency securities (1)
|
- | - | 505 | 1.15 | 5,919 | 2.58 | 1,052 | 3.00 | 7,476 | 2.54 | 2.33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLB
stock
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3,925 | 2.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mutual
funds
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 207 | 5.27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
securities available-for-sale
|
$ | 354 | 4.27 | % | $ | 1,625 | 2.41 | % | $ | 10,251 | 3.23 | % | $ | 10,737 | 3.63 | % | $ | 27,099 | 3.19 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
deposits
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 12,805 | 0.08 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
investments
|
$ | 354 | 4.27 | % | $ | 1,625 | 2.41 | % | $ | 10,251 | 3.23 | % | $ | 10,737 | 3.63 | % | $ | 39,904 | 2.19 | % |
(1)
|
Certain
securities have call features which allow the issuer to call the security
prior to maturity date.
|
Sources
of Funds
General. Deposits are the
primary source of the Company’s funds for lending and other investment
purposes. In addition to deposits, the Company derives funds from
FHLB advances, the amortization and prepayment of loans, the maturity and calls
of investment securities and operations. Scheduled loan principal
repayments are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and
outflows and loan prepayments are influenced significantly by general interest
rates and market conditions. The Company uses short-term borrowings
to compensate for reductions in the availability of funds from other sources or
on a longer term basis for general business purposes.
Deposits. During
2009, consumer and commercial deposits were attracted principally from within
the Company’s market area through the offering of a broad selection of deposit
instruments including noninterest-bearing demand accounts, NOW accounts, savings
accounts, money market savings, certificates of deposit and individual
retirement accounts. Deposit account terms vary according to the
minimum balance required, the period of time during which the funds must remain
on deposit, and the interest rate, among other factors. The maximum
rate of interest which the Company may pay is not established by regulatory
authority. The Company regularly evaluates its internal cost of
funds, surveys rates offered by competing institutions, reviews the Company’s
cash flow requirements for lending and liquidity, and executes rate changes when
deemed appropriate. Public fund deposits totaled $13.2 million at
December 31, 2009, an increase of $7.4 million from December 31,
2008. Beginning fiscal year 2005, the Company began utilizing
brokered certificates of deposit as an alternative wholesale funding
source. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had $601,000 in brokered
certificates of deposit, a decrease of $15.0 million from December 31,
2008.
- 12
-
Deposit
Portfolio. Deposits with the Company as of December 31, 2009,
were represented by the various types of deposit programs described
below.
Weighted
|
Percentage
|
|||||||||||||||
Average
|
Minimum
|
of Total
|
||||||||||||||
Interest Rate
|
Original Term
|
Checking and Savings Deposits
|
Balance
|
Balances
|
Deposits
|
|||||||||||
(Dollars in
|
||||||||||||||||
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
0.00%
|
None
|
Noninterest-bearing
demand
|
$ | 50 | $ | 16,185 | 4.8 | % | ||||||||
0.30%
|
None
|
NOW
accounts
|
50 | 77,694 | 23.2 | |||||||||||
0.19%
|
None
|
Savings
accounts
|
25 | 28,866 | 8.6 | |||||||||||
0.62%
|
None
|
Money
market savings
|
2,500 | 36,095 | 10.8 | |||||||||||
Total
non-maturing deposits
|
158,840 | 47.4 | ||||||||||||||
Certificates of Deposit
|
||||||||||||||||
0.67%
|
1-3
months
|
Fixed
term, fixed rate
|
$ | 1,000 | $ | 84 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
0.89%
|
4-6
months
|
Fixed
term, fixed rate
|
1,000 | 1,569 | 0.5 | |||||||||||
1.01%
|
7-9
months
|
Fixed
term, fixed rate
|
1,000 | 5,214 | 1.6 | |||||||||||
1.67%
|
10-12
months
|
Fixed
term, fixed rate
|
1,000 | 58,051 | 17.3 | |||||||||||
2.42%
|
13-24
months
|
Fixed
term, fixed rate
|
1,000 | 45,539 | 13.6 | |||||||||||
3.63%
|
25-36
months
|
Fixed
term, fixed rate
|
1,000 | 6,638 | 2.0 | |||||||||||
3.21%
|
37-48
months
|
Fixed
term, fixed rate
|
1,000 | 11,400 | 3.4 | |||||||||||
4.34%
|
49-60
months
|
Fixed
term, fixed rate
|
1,000 | 47,342 | 14.1 | |||||||||||
3.66%
|
61
months or greater
|
Fixed
term, fixed rate
|
1,000 | 136 | 0.0 | |||||||||||
Total
certificates of deposit
|
175,973 | 52.6 | ||||||||||||||
Total
deposits
|
$ | 334,813 | 100.0 | % |
- 13
-
The
following table sets forth the change in dollar amount of deposits in the
various types of deposit accounts offered by the Company between the dates
indicated.
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Increase
|
Increase
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance
|
(Decrease)
|
(Decrease)
|
Balance
|
|||||||||||||
12/31/09
|
%
|
$
|
12/31/08
|
|||||||||||||
Noninterest
bearing demand
|
$ | 16,185 | 6.47 | % | $ | 984 | $ | 15,201 | ||||||||
NOW
|
77,694 | 34.24 | 19,817 | 57,877 | ||||||||||||
Savings
accounts
|
28,866 | 10.48 | 2,738 | 26,128 | ||||||||||||
Money
market savings
|
36,095 | 5.45 | 1,867 | 34,228 | ||||||||||||
Certificates
of deposit that mature:
|
||||||||||||||||
within
12 months
|
110,154 | (26.77 | ) | (40,272 | ) | 150,426 | ||||||||||
within
12-36 months
|
42,028 | (9.90 | ) | (4,619 | ) | 46,647 | ||||||||||
beyond
36 months
|
23,791 | 20.99 | 4,128 | 19,663 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 334,813 | (4.39 | ) % | $ | (15,357 | ) | $ | 350,170 | |||||||
Increase
|
Increase
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance
|
(Decrease)
|
(Decrease)
|
Balance
|
|||||||||||||
12/31/08
|
%
|
$
|
12/31/07
|
|||||||||||||
Noninterest
bearing demand
|
$ | 15,201 | 11.18 | % | $ | 1,528 | $ | 13,673 | ||||||||
NOW
|
57,877 | 6.82 | 3,697 | 54,180 | ||||||||||||
Savings
accounts
|
26,128 | 6.50 | 1,595 | 24,533 | ||||||||||||
Money
market savings
|
34,228 | 3.56 | 1,177 | 33,051 | ||||||||||||
Certificates
of deposit that mature:
|
||||||||||||||||
within
12 months
|
150,426 | 4.48 | 6,456 | 143,970 | ||||||||||||
within
12-36 months
|
46,647 | (34.07 | ) | (24,102 | ) | 70,749 | ||||||||||
beyond
36 months
|
19,663 | (23.76 | ) | (6,129 | ) | 25,792 | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 350,170 | (4.31 | ) % | $ | (15,778 | ) | $ | 365,948 | |||||||
Increase
|
Increase
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance
|
(Decrease)
|
(Decrease)
|
Balance
|
|||||||||||||
12/31/07
|
%
|
$
|
12/31/06
|
|||||||||||||
Noninterest
bearing demand
|
$ | 13,673 | 6.92 | % | $ | 885 | $ | 12,788 | ||||||||
NOW
|
54,180 | 9.15 | 4,544 | 49,636 | ||||||||||||
Savings
accounts
|
24,533 | (2.49 | ) | (627 | ) | 25,160 | ||||||||||
Money
market savings
|
33,051 | (4.72 | ) | (1,637 | ) | 34,688 | ||||||||||
Certificates
of deposit that mature:
|
||||||||||||||||
within
12 months
|
143,970 | 7.15 | 9,601 | 134,369 | ||||||||||||
within
12-36 months
|
70,749 | (14.54 | ) | (12,035 | ) | 82,784 | ||||||||||
beyond
36 months
|
25,792 | 23.38 | 4,887 | 20,905 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 365,948 | 1.56 | % | $ | 5,618 | $ | 360,330 | ||||||||
Increase
|
Increase
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance
|
(Decrease)
|
(Decrease)
|
Balance
|
|||||||||||||
12/31/06
|
%
|
$
|
12/31/05
|
|||||||||||||
Noninterest
bearing demand
|
$ | 12,788 | 4.94 | % | $ | 602 | $ | 12,186 | ||||||||
NOW
|
49,636 | 0.80 | 394 | 49,242 | ||||||||||||
Savings
accounts
|
25,160 | (6.98 | ) | (1,888 | ) | 27,048 | ||||||||||
Money
market savings
|
34,688 | (22.64 | ) | (10,153 | ) | 44,841 | ||||||||||
Certificates
of deposit that mature:
|
||||||||||||||||
within
12 months
|
134,369 | 25.91 | 27,652 | 106,717 | ||||||||||||
within
12-36 months
|
82,784 | 15.02 | 10,811 | 71,973 | ||||||||||||
beyond
36 months
|
20,905 | (6.39 | ) | (1,426 | ) | 22,331 | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 360,330 | 7.77 | % | $ | 25,992 | $ | 334,338 |
- 14
-
The
following table sets forth the certificates of deposit in the Company classified
by rates as of the dates indicated:
At December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Rate:
|
||||||||||||
1.99%
or less
|
$ | 74,847 | $ | 1,266 | $ | 33 | ||||||
2.00-2.99%
|
27,247 | 45,490 | 1,697 | |||||||||
3.00-3.99%
|
38,226 | 78,812 | 23,788 | |||||||||
4.00-5.99%
|
35,653 | 91,168 | 214,983 | |||||||||
6.00-7.99%
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
8.00%
or greater
|
- | - | 10 | |||||||||
$ | 175,973 | $ | 216,736 | $ | 240,511 |
The
following table sets forth the amount and maturities of certificates of deposit
at December 31, 2009.
Amount Due
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Than 1
|
1-2
|
2-3
|
3-4
|
4-5
|
After 5
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Year
|
Years
|
Years
|
Years
|
Years
|
Years
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.99%
or less
|
$ | 69,428 | $ | 5,305 | $ | 114 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 74,847 | ||||||||||||||
2.00-2.99%
|
14,638 | 7,561 | 1,114 | 1,451 | 2,483 | - | 27,247 | |||||||||||||||||||||
3.00-3.99%
|
17,498 | 1,169 | 524 | 13,086 | 5,888 | 61 | 38,226 | |||||||||||||||||||||
4.00-5.99%
|
8,590 | 12,509 | 13,732 | 822 | - | - | 35,653 | |||||||||||||||||||||
6.00-7.99%
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
8.00%
or greater
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 110,154 | $ | 26,544 | $ | 15,484 | $ | 15,359 | $ | 8,371 | $ | 61 | $ | 175,973 |
The following table indicates the
amount of the Company’s certificates of deposit, including brokered certificates
of deposit, greater than $100,000 by time remaining until maturity at December
31, 2009.
Certificates
|
||||
of Deposit over
|
||||
Remaining Maturity
|
$
100,000
|
|||
(In thousands)
|
||||
Three
months or less
|
$ | 3,294 | ||
Three
through six months
|
4,009 | |||
Six
through twelve months
|
7,011 | |||
Over
twelve months
|
12,878 | |||
Total
|
$ | 27,192 |
- 15
-
The
following table sets forth the changes in deposits of the Company for the
periods indicated:
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Net
(decrease) before interest credited
|
$ | (21,310 | ) | $ | (25,311 | ) | $ | (5,199 | ) | |||
Interest
credited
|
5,953 | 9,533 | 10,817 | |||||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in deposits
|
$ | (15,357 | ) | $ | (15,778 | ) | $ | 5,618 |
Borrowings
Deposits are the Company’s primary
source of funds. The Company may also obtain funds from the
FHLB. FHLB advances are collateralized by selected assets of
the Company. Such advances are made pursuant to several different credit
programs, each of which has its own interest rate and range of maturities. The
maximum amount that the FHLB will advance to member institutions, including the
Bank fluctuates from time to time in accordance with the policies of the Office
of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”) and the FHLB.
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Weighted
average rate paid on:
|
||||||||||||
FHLB
advances
|
4.75 | % | 5.03 | % | 4.94 | % | ||||||
FHLB
advances:
|
||||||||||||
Maximum
balance
|
$ | 82,349 | $ | 97,379 | $ | 114,398 | ||||||
Average
balance
|
74,438 | 90,250 | 106,527 | |||||||||
Balance
at year end
|
66,500 | 82,349 | 97,379 | |||||||||
Weighted
average rate paid on:
|
||||||||||||
Other
borrowings
|
- | % | - | % | 7.08 | % | ||||||
Other
borrowings:
|
||||||||||||
Maximum
balance
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 700 | ||||||
Average
balance
|
- | - | 64 |
Title
Abstract Business
A component of the Company’s operating
strategy to increase non-interest income is through the abstract company
business conducted by a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank, First Iowa Title
Services, Inc. (“First Iowa”). First Iowa provides real estate title
abstracting services in Webster and Boone counties of Iowa. These
services include researching recorded documents at the county courthouse and
providing a history of those documents as they pertain to specific parcels of
real estate. This information is used to determine who owns specific
parcels of real estate and what encumbrances are on those specific
parcels. The abstract business performed by First Iowa replaces a
significant portion of the function of a title insurance
company. Iowa law prohibits Iowa insurance companies or companies
authorized to do business in Iowa from issuing title insurance or insurance
against loss or damage by reason of defective title, encumbrance or
otherwise. Institutions can purchase title insurance, for their own
protection or to sell loans on the secondary market. First Iowa had
11 employees as of December 31, 2009.
Insurance
and Annuity Business
Another component of the Company’s
operating strategy to increase non-interest income is through First Federal
Investment Services, Inc. (“First Federal Investments”), a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Bank. First Federal Investments’ activities include
the sale of life insurance on mortgage loans, credit life and accident and
health insurance on consumer loans made by the Company. In addition, First
Federal Investments sells life insurance, annuity products, mutual funds and
other noninsured products. First Federal Investments had four
employees as of December 31, 2009.
- 16
-
Mortgage
Company Business
First Iowa Mortgage, Inc. is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank. First Iowa Mortgage, Inc.
originated first mortgage loans and subsequently sold those loans and the
mortgage servicing rights to investors. First Iowa Mortgage, Inc.
currently is inactive and these services are provided by the Bank.
Multifamily
Apartment Buildings
On July 13, 1995, the Company formed
the Northridge Apartments Limited Partnership (“Northridge Partnership”), a
subsidiary of the Bank, with the Fort Dodge Housing Corporation (“FDHC”), a
non-profit Iowa corporation formed to acquire, develop and manage low- and
moderate-income housing for residents of the Fort Dodge area. The
FDHC is controlled by the Fort Dodge Municipal Housing Agency, an agency
chartered by the City of Fort Dodge. Northridge Partnership is a
low-income housing tax credit project for certain federal tax
purposes. A 44-unit apartment complex was completed on February 1,
1997. The tax credits for the year ended December 31, 2009 were
approximately $12,000. The final federal income tax credits of
approximately $24,000 associated with this project will be recognized over the
next two years.
On October 24, 1996, the Company formed
the Northridge Apartments Limited Partnership II (“Northridge Partnership II”),
a subsidiary of the Bank, to acquire, develop and manage low- and
moderate-income housing for residents of the Fort Dodge
area. Northridge Partnership II was awarded low-income housing tax
credits in 2002 by the Iowa Finance Authority. These credits were
awarded to construct a 23-unit apartment building in Fort Dodge, Iowa, which was
completed on March 31, 2003. The tax credits for the year ended
December 31, 2009 were approximately $127,000. The tax credits will
continue for an additional 3.3 year period.
Personnel
At December 31, 2009, the Company had
114 full-time and 33 part-time employees (including the 11 employees of First
Iowa and the four employees of First Federal Investments). None of
the Company’s employees are represented by a collective bargaining group. The
Company believes that it has good relationships with its employees.
- 17
-
FEDERAL
AND STATE TAXATION
Federal
Taxation
General. The following
discussion of tax matters is intended only as a summary and does not purport to
be a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to the Company. For
federal income tax purposes, the Company, the Bank and the Bank’s subsidiaries
will be eligible to file consolidated income tax returns and report their income
on a calendar year basis using the accrual method of accounting and are subject
to federal income taxation in the same manner as other corporations with some
exceptions, including particularly the Bank’s tax reserve for bad debts,
discussed below. The Company and the Bank are not currently under
audit by the IRS.
Bad Debt
Reserves. The Bank is a “large bank” as of December 31, 2009
(i.e., one with assets having an adjusted tax basis greater than $500 million)
and is no longer permitted to maintain a reserve for bad debts with respect to
loans. The Bank instead utilizes the tax charge-off method for tax
bad debt deductions.
Distributions. To the extent
that the Bank makes “nondividend distributions” to shareholders, such
distributions will be considered to result in distributions from the Bank’s
“base year reserve,” i.e. its reserve as of December 31, 1987, to the extent
thereof and then from its supplemental reserve for losses on loans, and an
amount based on the amount distributed will be included in the Bank’s taxable
income. Nondividend distributions include distributions in excess of
the Bank’s current and accumulated earnings and profits, distributions in
redemption of stock and distributions in partial or complete liquidation.
However, dividends paid out of the Bank’s current or accumulated earnings and
profits, as calculated for federal income tax purposes, will not constitute
nondividend distributions and, therefore, will not be included in the Bank’s
income.
The
amount of additional taxable income created from a nondividend distribution is
an amount that, when reduced by the tax attributable to the income, is equal to
the amount of the distribution. Thus, in some situations, approximately one and
one-half times the nondividend distribution would be includable in gross income
for federal income tax purposes, assuming a 35% federal corporate income tax
rate. We do not intend to pay distributions that would result in the
recapture of any portion of our bad debt reserves.
Corporate Alternative Minimum
Tax. The Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) imposes a tax on
alternative minimum taxable income (“AMTI”) at a rate of 20%. Only 90% of AMTI
can be offset by AMTI minimum tax net operating loss carryovers, of which there
is none. AMTI is also adjusted by determining the tax treatment of certain items
in a manner that negates the deferral of income resulting from the regular tax
treatment of those items. The Company does not expect to be subject
to the alternative minimum tax.
Dividends-Received
Deduction. The Company may exclude from its income 100% of
dividends received from the Bank as a member of the same affiliated group of
corporations.
State
and Local Taxation
Iowa and Colorado
Taxation. The Company and the Bank’s subsidiaries file Iowa
corporation tax returns and the Bank files an Iowa franchise and Colorado income
tax return.
The Iowa
corporate income tax rate ranges from 6% to 12% depending upon Iowa taxable
income. Interest from federal securities is not taxable for purposes
of the Iowa corporate income tax.
Iowa
imposes a financial institution franchise tax, in lieu of the corporate income
tax, on the Iowa franchise taxable income of thrift institutions at the rate of
5%. Iowa franchise taxable income is generally similar to federal
taxable income except that interest from state and municipal obligations is
taxable, and no deduction is allowed for state franchise taxes. The
net operating loss carryforward rules are similar to the federal
rules. However, Iowa no longer allows carrybacks of net operating
losses for tax years beginning on or after January 2009.
Colorado’s corporate income tax is
imposed on domestic and foreign corporations at a flat rate of 4.63% on net
income derived from Colorado sources.
- 18
-
REGULATION
General
North Central Bancshares, Inc. is
regulated as a savings and loan holding company by the OTS. The
Company is required to file reports with, and otherwise comply with, the rules
and regulations of the OTS and of the SEC under federal securities
laws.
First Federal Savings Bank of Iowa, a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, is a federally chartered savings
bank. The Bank is subject to regulation, examination and supervision
by the OTS, as its primary regulator, and the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (the “FDIC”), as its deposit insurer. The Bank files
reports with the OTS concerning its activities and financial
condition. The OTS and the FDIC have significant discretion in
connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination
policies, including policies with respect to the Bank’s capital levels,
classification of assets and establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for
regulatory purposes.
The following discussion is intended to
provide a summary of the material statutes and regulations applicable to savings
and loan holding companies and federal savings associations, and does not
purport to be a comprehensive description of all such statutes and
regulations.
Regulation
of Savings and Loan Holding Companies
The Company is registered as a unitary
savings and loan holding company and is subject to OTS regulations,
examinations, supervision and reporting requirements. In addition,
the OTS has enforcement authority over the Company and any of its non-savings
association subsidiaries. Among other things, this authority permits
the OTS to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a serious
risk to the financial safety, soundness or stability of a subsidiary savings
association. Unlike bank holding companies, savings and loan holding
companies are not subject to formal regulatory capital
requirements.
As a grandfathered unitary savings and
loan holding company, the Company generally is not restricted under existing
laws as to the types of business activities in which it may engage, provided
that the Bank continues to satisfy the QTL test. See “-Regulation of
Federal Savings Associations - Qualified Thrift Lender Test” for a discussion of
the QTL requirements. In addition, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act prohibits the sale
of grandfathered savings and loan holding companies to nonfinancial
companies. This prohibition is intended to restrict the transfer of
grandfathered rights to other entities, and thereby prevent evasion of the
limitation on the creation of new unitary savings and loan holding
companies.
The Home Owners’ Loan Act, as amended
(the “HOLA”), prohibits a savings and loan holding company, directly or
indirectly, or through one or more subsidiaries, from acquiring control (as
defined under OTS Regulations) of a savings association without obtaining prior
OTS approval. In addition, a savings and loan holding company is
prohibited from directly or indirectly acquiring (i) through mergers,
consolidation or purchase of assets, another savings association or a holding
company thereof, or acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of such
association or company without prior OTS approval; and (ii) control of any
depository institution not insured by the FDIC (except through a merger with and
into the holding company’s savings association subsidiary that is approved by
the OTS).
A savings and loan holding company also
may not acquire as a separate subsidiary a savings association that has a
principal office outside of the state where the principal office of its
subsidiary savings association in located, except, (i) in the case of certain
emergency acquisitions approved by the FDIC; (ii) if such holding company
controls a savings association subsidiary that operated a home or branch office
in such additional state as of March 5, 1987; or (iii) if the laws of the state,
in which the savings institution to be acquired is located, specifically
authorize a state chartered savings institution to be acquired by a savings
institution chartered by the state where the acquiring savings association or
savings and loan holding company is located or by a holding company that
controls such a state chartered association.
OTS regulations prohibit service at a
savings and loan holding company by any person convicted of certain criminal
offenses or who agreed to enter into a pre-trial diversion (or similar program)
in connection with a prosecution for such criminal offenses. The
regulation implements a provision of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act that
prevents persons who are currently prohibited from serving at an insured
institution from serving at a holding company that controls such
institution. In general, persons convicted of criminal offenses
involving dishonesty, breach of trust or money laundering are prohibited from
serving at a bank or its holding company. OTS has the authority to
review proposed appointments on a case-by-case basis, and by regulation has
exempted categories of employees of certain savings and loan holding companies
engaged in activities that the holding company is not permitted to engage
in.
- 19
-
Transactions between the Company or its
subsidiaries and the Bank are subject to various conditions and
limitations. See “-Regulation of Federal Savings Associations -
Transactions with Affiliates” and “-Regulation of Federal Savings Associations -
Limitation on Capital Distributions.”
Change of
Control. Federal law requires, with few exceptions, OTS
approval (or, in some cases, notice and effective clearance) prior to any
acquisition of control of the Company. Among other criteria, under the HOLA,
Change in Bank Control Act and OTS regulations, “control” is conclusively
presumed to exist if a person or company acquires, directly or indirectly, more
than 25% of any class of voting stock of the savings association or holding
company. Under OTS regulations, control is also presumed to exist,
subject to rebuttal, if an acquiror acquires more than 10% of any class of
voting stock (or more than 25% of any class of stock) and is subject to any of
several “control factors,” including but not limited to, the relative ownership
position of a person, the existence of control agreements and board
composition.
Regulation
of Federal Savings Associations
Business
Activities. The Bank derives its lending and investment powers
from the HOLA and OTS regulations promulgated thereunder. Under these
laws and regulations, the Bank may invest in mortgage loans secured by
residential and commercial real estate, commercial and consumer loans, certain
types of debt securities, and certain other assets. The Bank may also
establish service corporations that may engage in activities not otherwise
permissible for the Bank, including certain real estate equity investments and
securities and insurance brokerage. The Bank’s authority to invest in
certain types of loans or other investments is limited by federal law and
regulation.
Capital
Requirements. OTS regulations require the Bank to meet three
minimum capital standards:
|
(1)
|
a
tangible capital ratio requirement of 1.5% of total assets, as adjusted
under the OTS regulations;
|
|
(2)
|
a
leverage ratio requirement of 3.0% of core capital to such adjusted total
assets, if a savings association has been assigned the highest composite
rating of 1 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System;
and
|
|
(3)
|
a
risk-based capital ratio requirement of 8.0% of core and supplementary
capital to total risk-based assets, provided that the amount of
supplementary capital used to satisfy this requirement shall not exceed
the amount of core capital.
|
The minimum leverage capital ratio for
any other depository institution that does not have a composite rating of 1 will
be 4%, unless a higher leverage capital ratio is warranted by the particular
circumstances or risk profile of the depository institution. In
determining the amount of risk-weighted assets for purposes of the risk-based
capital requirement, a savings association must compute its risk-based assets by
multiplying its assets and certain off-balance sheet items by
risk-weights. Risk-weights are assigned by the OTS under its capital
regulations, and are based on the risks found by the OTS to be inherent in the
type of asset. Risk-weights range from 0% for cash and obligations
issued by the United States Government or its agencies and certain other assets
to 100%, for consumer, commercial, home equity and construction loans and
certain other assets.
Tangible capital is defined, generally,
as common stockholders’ equity (including retained earnings), certain
noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related earnings, minority interests
in equity accounts of fully consolidated subsidiaries, less intangibles assets
(other than certain servicing rights and nonsecurity financial instruments) and
investments in and loans to subsidiaries engaged in activities not permissible
for a national bank. The definition of core capital (or Tier 1
capital) is similar to that of tangible capital, but core capital also includes
certain qualifying supervisory goodwill and certain purchased credit card
relationships. Supplementary capital (or Tier 2 capital) includes
cumulative and other preferred stock, mandatory convertible debt securities,
subordinated debt and intermediate preferred stock and the allowance for loan
and lease losses. In addition, up to 45% of unrealized gains on
available-for-sale equity securities with a readily determinable fair value may
be included in Tier 2 capital. The allowance for loan and lease
losses includable in supplementary capital is limited to a maximum of 1.25% of
risk-weighted assets.
- 20
-
At December 31, 2009, the Bank met and
exceeded each of its capital requirements. The table below presents
the Bank’s regulatory capital as compared to the OTS regulatory capital
requirements at December 31, 2009:
Capital
|
||||||||||||
Bank Capital
|
Requirements
|
Excess Capital
|
||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Tangible
capital
|
$ | 44,450 | $ | 6,818 | $ | 37,632 | ||||||
Core
capital
|
44,450 | 13,636 | 30,814 | |||||||||
Risk-based
capital
|
48,429 | 26,080 | 22,349 |
Prompt Corrective Action
Regulations. Under the OTS “prompt corrective action”
regulations, the OTS is required to take certain, and is authorized to take
other, supervisory actions against undercapitalized savings
associations. For this purpose, a savings association is placed in
one of the following five categories based on the association’s
capital:
•
|
well
capitalized;
|
•
|
adequately
capitalized;
|
•
|
undercapitalized;
|
•
|
significantly
undercapitalized; or
|
•
|
critically
undercapitalized.
|
At December 31, 2009, the Bank met the
criteria for being considered “well capitalized.” When appropriate,
the OTS can require corrective action by a savings association holding company
under the “prompt corrective action” provision of federal law.
Limitation on Capital
Distributions. The OTS imposes various restrictions or
requirements on the Bank’s ability to make capital distributions, including the
payment of cash dividends. A savings association that is the
subsidiary of a savings and loan holding company must file a notice or
application with the OTS at least 30 days before making a capital
distribution. An application is required if the total amount of an
institution’s capital distributions, including the proposed distribution, for
the applicable calendar year would exceed an amount equal to the Bank’s net
income for that year plus the Bank’s retained net income for the previous two
years.
The OTS may disapprove a notice of
application if the:
•
|
Bank
would be undercapitalized following the
distribution;
|
•
|
proposed
capital distribution raises safety and soundness concerns;
or
|
•
|
capital
distribution would violate a prohibition contained in any statute,
regulation or agreement.
|
Liquidity. The
Bank is required to maintain a sufficient amount of liquid assets to ensure its
safe and sound operation.
Insurance of Deposit
Accounts. The FDIC merged the Bank Insurance Fund and the
Savings Association Insurance Fund to form the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) on
March 31, 2006. The Bank is a member of the DIF, which insures
customer deposit accounts as described below, and the institution pays deposit
insurance assessments to the FDIC to support the FDIC’s maintenance of the
DIF. Historically, the FDIC insured customer deposit accounts up to
$100,000; however, pursuant to the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act enacted
in October 2008, the DIF currently insures customer deposit accounts up to
$250,000. This expanded coverage was extended in May, 2009, to
continue until at least December 31, 2013, and may or may not be extended beyond
that date. In November 2008, in order to provide additional stability
to the financial system, the FDIC also expanded its deposit coverage to provide
a full guarantee to insured depository institutions that participate in the
Transaction Account Guarantee Program (“TAGP”) of its Temporary Liquidity
Guarantee Program (“TLGP”) for customers’ non-interest bearing transaction
accounts for all amounts in such accounts. At the same time the FDIC
also established the TLGP Debt Guarantee Program (“DGP”), which guarantees
certain senior unsecured debt issued by a depository institution and/or its
holding companies. The Bank participates in the both TAGP and DGP;
however, to date the Bank has not issued, nor does it have any plans to issue,
guaranteed debt under the DGP.
- 21
-
Effective January 1, 2007, the FDIC
established a risk-based assessment system for determining the deposit insurance
assessments to be paid by insured depository institutions to maintain the
reserve ratio of the DIF in a range between 1.15 to 1.50% of estimated insured
deposits held by insured depository institutions. The FDIC deposit
insurance assessment system sets deposit insurance premiums based upon the risks
a particular bank or savings association poses to the DIF. Under the
assessment system, the FDIC assigns an institution to one of four risk
categories, with the first category having two sub-categories based on the
institution’s most recent supervisory and capital evaluations, designed to
measure risk. Formerly, assessment rates ranged from 5 basis points
of assessable deposits for an institution in the least risky sub-category of the
lowest risk category to 43 basis points of assessable deposits for an
institution in the highest risk category.
The FDIC is authorized to raise the
assessment rates as necessary to maintain the DIF. In October 2008,
the FDIC proposed raising assessment rates to implement a Restoration Plan for
the DIF, which had fallen significantly below the minimum target level of 1.15%
as a result of recent bank failures. On February 27, 2009, the FDIC
voted to implement an amended Restoration Plan. Under the amended
Restoration Plan, the FDIC implemented an assessment rate schedule to raise the
DIF reserve ratio to 1.15% within seven years. Pursuant to the Plan,
the FDIC set assessment rates and made adjustments based on
risk. Banks in the lowest risk category pay initial base rates
ranging from 0.12% of deposits to 0.16% of assessable deposits on an annual
basis (applicable to assessments for the second quarter of 2009 and thereafter);
but this may be further adjusted to between 0.07% and 0.24% of assessable
deposits for banks’ holding unsecured debt, certain secured liabilities and
brokered deposits beyond a certain amount. Banks in the highest risk
category will pay an initial base rate of 0.45% of assessable deposits, which
may also be adjusted to between 0.40% of deposits and 0.775% of assessable
deposits for excess amounts of unsecured debt, certain secured liabilities and
brokered deposits. The FDIC also has the ability to adjust the
assessment rate schedule from quarter to quarter. A material increase
in insurance assessments could have an adverse effect on the earnings of the
Bank.
Subsequently,
in light of the increased stress on the DIF caused by these developments, and in
order to maintain a strong funding position and restore the reserve ratios of
the DIF, the FDIC required insured institutions to prepay the premiums that are
expected to become due over the next three years on December 30,
2009. Moreover, on January 12, 2010, the FDIC issued a proposed rule
that seeks to modify the FDIC’s risk-based deposit insurance assessment system
(risk-based assessment system) to account for the risks posed by certain
employee compensation programs offered by certain depository
institutions. The FDIC does not propose to limit the amount which
employees are compensated, but rather is considering adjusting risk-based
deposit insurance assessment rates to adequately compensate the DIF for the
risks inherent in the design of certain compensation programs. At
this time we do not believe our compensation programs will result in increased
risk-based assessments.
As a
participant in the TLGP, which was scheduled to end on December 31, 2009 but
which has been extended until June 30, 2010, the Bank is also assessed an annual
rate surcharge on its noninterest-bearing transaction deposit amounts over
$250,000. The former rate of 10 basis points has been raised for
duration of the extension period to 15 basis points for depository institutions
in risk category I, 20 basis points for depository institutions in risk category
II, and 25 basis points for depository institutions in risk categories III and
IV. However, it is not assessed on amounts that are otherwise
insured, for example, in a custodial account that has pass-through coverage for
each actual owner where each owner has an account balance of less than
$250,000. This surcharge is collected through the normal assessment
cycle.
In addition, all FDIC-insured
institutions are required to pay a pro rata portion of the
interest due on obligations issued by the Financing Corporation to fund the
closing and disposal of failed thrift institutions by the Resolution Trust
Corporation. At December 31, 2008, the FDIC assessed DIF-insured
deposits 1.14 basis points per $100 of deposits to cover those
obligations. The Financing Corporation rate is adjusted quarterly to
reflect changes in assessment bases of the DIF. This obligation will
continue until the Financing Corporation bonds mature in 2019.
- 22
-
Under the
Federal Deposit Insurance Act, the FDIC may terminate the insurance of an
institution’s deposits upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe
or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue
operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or
condition imposed by the FDIC. Management does not know of any
practice, condition or violation that might lead to termination of deposit
insurance.
Standards for Safety and
Soundness. Pursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, the
OTS has adopted a set of guidelines prescribing safety and soundness
standards. These guidelines establish general standards relating to
internal controls, information systems, internal audit systems, loan
documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate risk exposure, asset growth,
asset quality, earnings standards, compensation, fees and
benefits. In general, the guidelines require appropriate systems and
practices to identify and manage the risks and exposures specified in the
guidelines.
In addition, the OTS adopted
regulations that authorize, but do not require, the OTS to order a savings
association that has been given notice that it is not satisfying these safety
and soundness standards to submit a compliance plan. If, after being
notified, a savings association fails to submit an acceptable plan or fails in
any material respect to implement an accepted plan, the OTS must issue an order
directing action to correct the deficiency. Further, the OTS may
issue an order directing other actions of the types to which an undercapitalized
association is subject under the “prompt corrective action” provisions of
federal law. If a savings association fails to comply with such an
order, the OTS may seek to enforce the order in judicial proceedings and/or
impose civil money penalties.
Loans to One
Borrower. The Bank is generally subject to the same limits on
loans to one borrower as a national bank. With specified exceptions,
the Bank’s total loans or extensions of credit to a single borrower cannot
exceed 15% of the Bank’s unimpaired capital and surplus which does not include
accumulated other comprehensive income. The Bank may lend additional
amounts up to 10% of its unimpaired capital and surplus which does not include
accumulated other comprehensive income, if the loans or extensions of credit are
fully-secured by readily-marketable collateral. The Bank currently
complies with applicable loans-to-one borrower limitations.
Qualified Thrift Lender
Test. Under federal law, the Bank must comply with the
qualified thrift lender or “QTL” test. Under the QTL test, the Bank
is required to maintain at least 65% of its “portfolio assets” in certain
“qualified thrift investments” in at least nine months of the most recent
12-month period. “Portfolio assets” means, in general, the Bank’s
total assets less the sum of:
•
|
specified
liquid assets up to 20% of total
assets;
|
•
|
goodwill
and other intangible assets; and
|
•
|
the
value of property used to conduct the Bank’s
business.
|
The Bank may also satisfy the QTL test
by qualifying as a “domestic building and loan association” as defined in the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The Bank met the QTL test at December
31, 2009, and in each of the prior 12 months, and therefore is a “qualified
thrift lender.”
If the Bank fails the QTL test it must
promptly come into compliance, operate under certain restrictions on its
activities or convert to a bank charter, which would cause the Company to be
regulated as a bank holding company, subject to the Bank Holding Company Act of
1956, as amended and the rules and regulations of the Federal
Reserve.
Transactions with
Affiliates. The Bank’s authority to engage in transactions
with its affiliates is limited by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve
Act and the Federal Reserve’s Regulation W, as made applicable to federal
savings associations by the HOLA and the OTS regulations. In general,
these transactions must be on terms which are as favorable to the Bank as
comparable transactions with non-affiliates. In addition, certain
types of these transactions, referred to as “covered transactions,” are subject
to quantitative limits based on a percentage of the Bank’s capital, thereby
restricting the total dollar amount of transactions the Bank may engage in with
each individual affiliate and with all affiliates in the
aggregate. Affiliates must pledge qualifying collateral in amounts
between 100% and 130% of the covered transaction in order to receive loans from
the Bank. In addition, applicable regulations prohibit a savings
association from lending to any of its affiliates that engage in activities that
are not permissible for bank holding companies and from purchasing low-quality
(i.e., non-performing) assets from an affiliate or purchasing the securities of
any affiliate, other than a subsidiary.
- 23
-
Loans to
Insiders. The Bank’s authority to extend credit to its
directors, executive officers and principal shareholders, as well as to entities
controlled by such persons, is currently governed by the requirements of
Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O of the
Federal Reserve, as made applicable to federal savings associations by the HOLA
and the OTS regulations. Among other things, these provisions require
that extensions of credit to insiders:
|
•
|
be
made on terms that are substantially the same as, and follow credit
underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than, those prevailing
for comparable transactions with third parties and that do not involve
more that the normal risk of repayment or present other features that are
unfavorable to the Bank; and
|
|
•
|
not
exceed certain limitations on the amount of credit extended to such
persons, individually and in the aggregate, which limits are based, in
part, on the amount of the Bank’s
capital.
|
In addition, extensions for credit in
excess of certain limits must be approved by the Bank’s board of
directors.
Community Reinvestment
Act. Under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), as
implemented by OTS regulations, the Bank has a continuing and affirmative
obligation consistent with its safe and sound operation to help meet the credit
needs of its entire community, including low and moderate income
neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending
requirements or programs for the Bank, nor does it limit the Bank’s discretion
to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited
to its particular community, consistent with the CRA. Rather, the CRA
requires the OTS, in connection with its examination of the Bank, to assess the
association’s record of meeting the credit needs of its community and to take
such record into account in its evaluation of certain applications by the
Bank. The CRA also requires all institutions to make public
disclosure of their CRA ratings. The Bank received the highest rating
of “Outstanding” in its most recent examination.
CRA regulations rate an institution
based on its actual performance in meeting community needs. In
particular, the assessment system focuses on three tests:
•
|
a
lending test, to evaluate the institution’s record of making loans in its
assessment areas;
|
|
•
|
an
investment test, to evaluate the institution’s record of investing in
community development projects, affordable housing, and programs
benefiting low or moderate income individuals and businesses in its
assessment area, or a broader area that includes its assessment areas;
and
|
|
•
|
a
service test, to evaluate the institution’s delivery of services through
its retail banking channels and the extent and innovativeness of its
community development services.
|
Consumer Protection and Other Laws
and Regulations. The Bank is subject to various laws and
regulations dealing generally with consumer protection matters. The Bank may be
subject to potential liability under these laws and regulations for material
violations. The Bank’s lending operations are also subject to federal laws
applicable to credit transactions, such as the:
|
•
|
Federal
Truth In Lending Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer
borrowers;
|
|
•
|
Home
Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975, requiring financial institutions to
provide information to enable the public and public officials to determine
whether a financial institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet
the housing needs of the community it
serves;
|
|
•
|
Equal
Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race,
creed or other prohibited factors in extending
credit;
|
|
•
|
Fair
Credit Reporting Act of 1978, as amended by the Fair and Accurate Credit
Transactions Act (“FACT Act”), governing the use and provision of
information to credit reporting agencies, certain identity theft
protections and certain credit and other
disclosures;
|
- 24
-
|
•
|
Fair
Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be
collected by collection agencies;
|
|
•
|
Servicemembers’
Civil Relief Act;
|
|
•
|
Credit
Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009”;
and
|
|
•
|
Rules
and regulations of the various federal agencies charged with the
responsibility of implementing these federal
laws.
|
The
Bank’s deposit operations are subject to federal laws applicable to deposit
transactions, such as the:
|
•
|
Truth
in Savings Act, which imposes disclosure obligations to enable consumers
to make informed decisions about accounts at depository
institutions;
|
|
•
|
Electronic
Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E, implemented thereunder by the Federal
Reserve, which govern automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit
accounts and customers’ rights and liabilities arising from the use of
automated teller machines and other electronic banking services;
and
|
|
•
|
Rules
and regulations of the various federal agencies charged with the
responsibility of implementing these federal
laws.
|
Subprime Mortgage
Lending. To address current issues in the subprime mortgage
market, the Federal Reserve approved a final rule for home mortgage loans to
better protect consumers and facilitate responsible lending. The
final rule amends the Federal Reserve’s regulations that implement the Truth in
Lending Act (“TILA”), and was adopted under the Home Ownership and Equity
Protection Act. The rule prohibits unfair, abusive or deceptive home mortgage
lending practices and restricts certain other mortgage practices. The
final rule also establishes advertising standards and requires certain mortgage
disclosures to be given to consumers earlier in the transaction. The
final rule adds four key protections for a newly defined category of
“higher-priced mortgage loans” secured by a consumer’s principal
dwelling. For loans in this category, the protections are aimed to
(a) prohibit a lender from making a loan without regard to borrowers’ ability to
repay the loan from income and assets other than the home’s value; (b) require
creditors to verify the income and assets they rely upon to determine repayment
ability; (c) ban any prepayment penalty if the payment can change in the initial
four years (for other higher-priced loans, a prepayment penalty period cannot
last for more than two years); and (d) require creditors to establish escrow
accounts for property taxes and homeowner’s insurance for all first-lien
mortgage loans. In addition to the rules governing higher-priced
loans, the rule also affords protections for loans secured by a consumer’s
principal dwelling, regardless of whether the loan is
higher-priced.
Prohibitions against Tying
Arrangements. As a federal savings association, the Bank is
subject to prohibitions on certain tying arrangements. The Bank is
prohibited, subject to certain exceptions, from extending credit to or offering
any other service, or fixing or varying the consideration for such extension of
credit or service, on the condition that the customer obtain some additional
product or service from the institution or its affiliates or not obtain services
of a competitor of the institution.
Privacy
Provisions. The Bank is required to disclose its privacy
policy, including identifying parties with whom it shares a customer’s
“non-public personal information,” to customers at the time of establishing the
customer relationship and annually thereafter. The Bank is required
to provide its customers with the ability to “opt-out” of having their personal
information shared with unaffiliated third parties except under limited
circumstances, such as the processing of transactions requested by the consumer
or when the financial institution is jointly sponsoring a product or service
with a nonaffiliated third party. Additionally, financial
institutions generally may not disclose consumer account numbers to any
nonaffiliated third party for use in telemarketing, direct mail marketing or
other marketing to consumers. The Bank currently has a privacy
protection policy in place and believes that such policy is in compliance with
regulations.
On November 17, 2009, OTS and each of
the federal banking regulatory agencies released a final model privacy notice
form designed to make it easier for consumers to understand how financial
institutions collect and share information about them. The model form can be
used by financial institutions to comply with these requirements. The final rule
issued by the regulators provides that a financial institution that chooses to
use the model form obtains a “safe harbor” and will satisfy the disclosure
requirements for notices.
- 25
-
Affiliate
Marketing. The federal banking agencies, including the OTS,
have finalized a joint rule implementing Section 214 of the FACT Act,
which provides consumers with the ability to restrict companies from using
certain information obtained from affiliates to make marketing
solicitations. In general, a person is prohibited from using
information received from an affiliate to make a solicitation for marketing
purposes to a consumer, unless the consumer is given notice and had a reasonable
opportunity to opt out of such solicitations. The rule permits
opt-out notices to be given by any affiliate that has a preexisting business
relationship with the consumer and permits a joint notice from two or more
affiliates. Moreover, such notice would not be applicable to the
company using the information if it has a pre-existing business relationship
with the consumer. The notice that is required under the FACT Act may
be combined with other required disclosures to be provided under other
provisions of law, including notices required under the privacy provisions of
the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
Identity Theft. The federal
banking agencies, including the OTS, finalized a joint rule implementing Section
315 of the FACT Act, requiring each financial institution or creditor to develop
and implement a written Identity Theft Prevention Program to detect, prevent,
and mitigate identity theft in connection with the opening of certain accounts
or certain existing accounts. The rule became effective on January 1,
2008 and mandatory compliance commenced on November 1, 2008.
Among the requirements under the rule,
the Bank is required to adopt “reasonable policies and procedures”
to:
|
·
|
identify
relevant Red Flags for covered accounts and incorporate those Red Flags
into the Program;
|
|
·
|
detect
Red Flags that have been incorporated into the
Program;
|
|
·
|
respond
appropriately to any Red Flags that are detected to prevent and mitigate
identity theft; and
|
|
·
|
ensure
the Program is updated periodically, to reflect changes in risks to
customers or to the safety and soundness of the financial institution or
creditor from identity theft.
|
The Bank has implemented a program to
meet the requirements of the regulation, and believes it is currently in
compliance with this regulation.
Anti-Money Laundering/Terrorist
Financing Requirements. The Company and the Bank are subject
to the Bank Secrecy Act, as amended by the Uniting and Strengthening America by
Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act
(“USA PATRIOT Act”), which gives the federal government powers to address money
laundering and terrorist threats through enhanced domestic security measures,
expanded surveillance powers, and mandatory transaction reporting
obligations. By way of example, the Bank Secrecy Act imposes an
affirmative obligation on the Bank to report currency transactions that exceed
certain thresholds and to report other transactions determined to be
suspicious.
Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act takes
measures intended to encourage information sharing among financial institutions,
bank regulatory agencies and law enforcement bodies. Further, certain
provisions of Title III impose affirmative obligations on a broad range of
financial institutions, including banks, thrifts, brokers, dealers, credit
unions, money transfer agents and parties registered under the Commodity
Exchange Act. Among other requirements, the USA PATRIOT Act imposes
the following obligations on financial institutions:
|
•
|
financial
institutions must establish anti-money laundering programs that include,
at minimum: (i) internal policies, procedures, and controls, (ii) specific
designation of an anti-money laundering compliance officer, (iii) ongoing
employee training programs, and (iv) an independent audit function to test
the anti-money laundering program;
|
|
•
|
financial
institutions must establish and meet minimum standards for customer due
diligence, identification and
verification;
|
- 26
-
|
•
|
financial
institutions that establish, maintain, administer, or manage private
banking accounts or correspondent accounts in the United States for
non-United States persons or their representatives (including foreign
individuals visiting the United States) must establish appropriate,
specific, and, where necessary, enhanced due diligence policies,
procedures, and controls to detect and report instances of
money laundering through those
accounts;
|
|
•
|
financial
institutions are prohibited from establishing, maintaining, administering
or managing correspondent accounts for foreign shell banks (foreign banks
that do not have a physical presence in any country) and are subject to
certain recordkeeping obligations with respect to correspondent accounts
of foreign banks; and
|
|
•
|
bank
regulators are directed to consider a bank’s or holding company’s
effectiveness in combating money laundering when ruling on Federal Reserve
Act and Bank Merger Act
applications.
|
The Office of Foreign Assets Control
(“OFAC”), which is a division of the U.S. Department of the Treasury
(“Treasury”), is responsible for helping to insure that United States entities
do not engage in transactions with “enemies” of the United States, as defined by
various Executive Orders and Acts of Congress. The Bank and the
Company, like all United States companies and individuals, are prohibited from
transacting business with the individuals and entities named on OFAC’s list of
Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons. If the Bank finds
a name on any transaction account or wire transfer that is on an OFAC list, the
Bank is required to investigate, and if the match is confirmed, the Bank must
take additional actions including freezing such account, filing a suspicious
activity report and notifying the FBI. Failure to comply may result
in fines and other penalties. The Office of Foreign Asset Control has
issued guidance directed at financial institutions in which it asserted that it
may, in its discretion, examine institutions determined to be high-risk or to be
lacking in their efforts to comply with these prohibitions.
Enforcement. The
OTS has primary enforcement responsibility over savings associations, including
the Bank. This enforcement authority includes, among other things,
the ability to assess civil money penalties, to issue cease and desist orders
and to remove directors and officers. In general, these enforcement
actions may be initiated in response to violations of laws and regulations, or
unsafe or unsound practices.
Federal Home Loan Bank
System. The Bank is a member of the FHLB of Des Moines, which
is one of the regional FHLBs composing the FHLB System. Each FHLB
serves as a central credit facility for its member institutions by extending
advances up to a maximum aggregate amount. The Bank, as a member of
the FHLB of Des Moines, is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock
in the FHLB of Des Moines in an amount at least equal to the greater of $10,000
or 0.12% of the total assets of the Bank. The Bank is also required
to own activity based stock, which is based on 4.45% of the Bank’s outstanding
advances. These percentages are subject to change by the
FHLB. The Bank was in compliance with this requirement with an
investment in FHLB of Des Moines stock at December 31, 2009 of $3.9
million.
The FHLBs are required to provide funds
for the resolution of insolvent thrifts and to contribute funds for affordable
housing programs. These requirements could reduce the amount of
earnings that the FHLBs can pay as dividends to their members and could also
result in the FHLBs imposing a higher rate of interest on advances to their
members. If dividends were reduced, or if interest on future FHLB
advances were increased, the Bank’s net interest income would be
affected.
Federal Reserve
System. Under the Federal Reserve Act and the Federal
Reserve’s regulations, the Bank is required to maintain reserves against its
transaction accounts (primarily NOW and regular checking
accounts). The regulations exempt $10.7 million of otherwise
reservable balances from the reserve requirements. A 3% reserve is
required for transaction account balances over $10.7 million and up to $44.5
million. Transaction account balances over $44.5 million are subject
to a reserve requirement of $1.34 million plus 10% of any amount over $44.5
million. The Bank is in compliance with the foregoing reserve
requirements. Because required reserves must be maintained in the
form of vault cash, a noninterest-bearing account at a Federal Reserve Bank, or
a pass-through account as defined by the Federal Reserve, the effect of this
reserve requirement is to reduce the Bank’s interest-earning
assets. The balances maintained to meet the reserve requirements
imposed by the Federal Reserve may be used to satisfy liquidity requirements
imposed by the OTS. The Federal Reserve is consolidating its check processing
operation so that all checks presented to depository institutions in the United
States, payable on depository institutions in the United States, are deemed to
be local checks.
- 27
-
Effect of Governmental Monetary
Polices. Our earnings will be affected by domestic economic
conditions and the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States government
and its agencies. The Federal Reserve has, and is likely to continue
to have, an important impact on the operating results of financial institutions
through its power to implement national monetary policy, among other things, in
order to curb inflation or combat a recession. The Federal Reserve
affects the levels of bank loans, investments and deposits through its control
over the issuance of United States government securities, its regulation of the
discount rate applicable to member banks and its influence over reserve
requirements to which member banks are subject. We cannot predict the
nature or impact of future changes in monetary and fiscal policies.
Federal Securities
Laws. The Company’s common stock is registered with the SEC
under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”). The Company is subject to information, proxy
solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements under the
Exchange Act.
Listing on
Nasdaq. The Company’s common stock is listed on the Nasdaq
Global Market. In order to maintain such listing, the Company is
subject to certain corporate governance requirements, including:
|
•
|
a
majority of its board must be composed of independent
directors;
|
|
•
|
it
is required to have an audit committee composed of at least three
directors, each of whom is an independent director, as such term is
defined by both the rules of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
and by Securities Exchange Act
regulations;
|
|
•
|
its
nominating committee and compensation committee must also be composed
entirely of independent directors;
and
|
|
•
|
each
of its audit committee and nominating committee must have a publicly
available written charter.
|
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act. As a public company, the Company is subject to the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which implements a broad range of corporate governance and
accounting measures for public companies designed to promote honesty and
transparency in corporate America and better protect investors from corporate
wrongdoing including:
|
•
|
auditor
independence provisions which restrict non-audit services that accountants
may provide to their audit clients;
|
|
•
|
additional
corporate governance and responsibility measures, including the
requirement that the chief executive officer and chief financial officer
certify financial statements;
|
|
•
|
a
requirement that companies establish and maintain a system of internal
control over financial reporting and that a company’s management provide
an annual report regarding its assessment of the effectiveness of such
internal control over financial reporting to the company’s regulator and
the FDIC. The Company’s assessment of internal control over
financial reports is included in Part III, Item 9A(T) of this
10-K.
|
|
•
|
The
Company’s independent accountants are also required to provide an
attestation report with respect to management’s assessment of the
effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
The Company, as a smaller reporting company, is not subject to attestation
provision until the year ending December 31,
2010;
|
|
•
|
an
increase in the oversight of, and enhancement of certain requirements
relating to audit committees of public companies, including how they
interact with the company’s independent auditors;
and
|
•
|
a
range of enhanced disclosure requirements as well as penalties for fraud
and other violations.
|
- 28
-
Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 prohibits the extension of personal loans to directors and executive
officers of issuers. The prohibition, however, does not apply to
mortgages advanced by an insured depository institution, such as the Bank, that
are subject to the insider lending restrictions of Section 22(h) of the Federal
Reserve Act.
Developments
in Regulation of the Financial Sector
Actions taken by
Congress and bank regulatory agencies in response to recent market
instability. In response to the widely-publicized
deteriorating conditions in the U.S. banking and financial system, Treasury and
federal banking agencies have taken various actions as part of a comprehensive
strategy to stabilize the financial system and housing markets, and to
strengthen U.S. financial institutions.
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act
of 2008. The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
(“EESA”), enacted on October 3, 2008, provided the Secretary of Treasury with
authority to, among other things, establish the Troubled Asset Relief Program
(“TARP”) to purchase from financial institutions up to $700 billion of troubled
assets, which include residential or commercial mortgages and any securities,
obligations, or other instruments that are based on or related to such
mortgages, that in each case was originated or issued on or before March 14,
2008. The term “troubled assets” also included any other financial
instrument that the Secretary, after consultation with the Chairman of the
Federal Reserve Board determines the purchase of which is necessary to promote
financial market stability, upon transmittal of such determination in writing,
to the appropriate committees of the U.S. Congress. TARP was
originally scheduled to expire in December, 2009, but has since been extended by
the Treasury and is now scheduled to expire on October 3, 2010. EESA
also provided for the temporary increase of federal deposit insurance coverage
levels under the DIF from $100,000 to $250,000 per deposit category, per
depositor, per institution, through December 31, 2009, which has since been
extended until December 31, 2013.
On October 14, 2008, the Treasury
announced the Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”) under EESA, pursuant to which
Treasury would purchase up to $250 billion of senior preferred shares from
qualifying financial institutions on standardized terms. The Company
is a participant of the program and as such, is required to comply with a number
of restrictions and provisions, including limits on executive compensation,
stock redemptions and declaration of dividends. In June of 2009, the
Treasury imposed limits on the amount of compensation institutions receiving
TARP funds were permitted to pay to their executives. Such restrictions apply to
any entity that has received or will receive financial assistance under TARP,
and shall generally continue to apply for as long as any obligation arising from
financial assistance provided under TARP, including preferred stock issued under
the CPP, remains outstanding.
On February 25, 2009, the Treasury
announced the Capital Assistance Program (“CAP”), which is a new capital program under the
Treasury Department’s Financial Stability Plan. The purpose of the
CAP is to restore confidence throughout the financial system by ensuring that
the nation's largest banking institutions have a sufficient capital cushion
against larger than expected future losses, should they occur due to a more
severe economic environment, and to support lending to creditworthy
borrowers. The CAP does not replace the CPP and is open to qualifying
institutions regardless of whether they participated in the CPP. The
deadline to apply for the CAP was May 25, 2009.
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009. On February 17, 2009, the President signed the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 into law as a $787 billion dollar
economic stimulus. The stimulus includes discretionary spending for
among other things, infrastructure projects, increased unemployment benefits and
food stamps, as well as tax relief for individuals and businesses.
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee
Program. The FDIC established the Temporary Liquidity
Guarantee Program (“TLGP”) on October 14, 2008 (i) guaranteeing certain debt
issued by FDIC-insured institutions and certain holding companies on or after
October 14, 2008 through June 30, 2009; and (ii) providing unlimited insurance
coverage for non-interest bearing transaction accounts. On March 17,
2009, the Board of Directors of the FDIC voted to extend the debt guarantee
portion of the TLGP from June 30, 2009 through October 31, 2009, and to impose a
surcharge on debt issued with a maturity of one-year or more beginning in the
second quarter to gradually phase-out the program.
The Debt Guarantee Program (“DGP”)
component of the TLGP provides liquidity to the inter-bank lending market and
promotes stability in the unsecured funding market. Under the DGP,
the FDIC temporarily guarantees all newly-issued senior unsecured debt up to
prescribed limits. In general, the maximum amount of outstanding debt
that is guaranteed under the DGP for each participating entity at any time is
limited to 125 percent of the par value of the participating entity’s senior
unsecured debt. The DGP ensures that such debt would be fully
protected in the event the issuing institution subsequently fails or its holding
company files for bankruptcy. Entities that did not wish to
participate in the DGP had to opt out by December 5, 2008. As a
participant of the DGP, the Company is bound by the program’s requirements,
which include the payment of assessments that are determined by multiplying the
amount of FDIC-guaranteed debt times the term of the debt (expressed in years)
times an annualized assessment rate. To date, neither the Company nor
the Bank has issued, nor do either have any plans to issue, guaranteed debt
under the DGP.
- 29
-
Under the Transaction Account Guarantee
Program (“TAGP”) component of the TLGP, non-interest bearing transaction
accounts are fully insured through June 30, 2010. Non-interest
bearing transaction accounts are any deposit accounts with respect to which
interest is neither accrued nor paid and on which the insured depository
institution does not reserve the right to require advance notice of an intended
withdrawal, including traditional demand deposit checking accounts that allow
for an unlimited number of deposits and withdrawals at any
time. Generally, transactions accounts do not include
interest-bearing money market deposit accounts or sweep arrangements that result
in funds being placed in an interest-bearing account as the result of the
sweep. The unlimited guarantee under the TAGP is in addition to, and
separate from, the general deposit insurance coverage provided for under the
DIF, currently at $250,000 per depositor, per institution until December 31,
2013. As a participant of the TAGP, the Bank is bound by the
requirements of the program, including the quarterly payment of an annualized
assessment of 15, 20, or 25 basis points, depending on our risk category, on any
deposit amounts exceeding the existing deposit insurance limit of
$250,000. (See the above discussion at “Insurance of Deposit
Accounts.”)
Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan
Facility. Under the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (“TALF”),
the Federal Reserve Bank of New York will lend up to $200 billion to eligible
owners of certain AAA-rated ABS backed by newly and recently originated auto
loans, credit card loans, student loans, and SBA-guaranteed small business
loans. The TALF has the potential to generate up to $1 trillion of
lending for businesses and households. Any U.S. company that owns
eligible collateral may borrow from the TALF provided the company maintains an
account relationship with a primary dealer. The facility is expected
to cease making new loans collateralized by newly issued commercial mortgage
backed securities on June 30, 2010, and loans collateralized by all other types
of TALF-eligible newly issued and legacy ABS on March 31, 2010, unless the
Federal Reserve extends the facility.
Unfair and Deceptive
Practices. On January 29, 2009, the OTS, along with other
federal banking agencies (“the Agencies”) issued a joint, final rule under
Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”) that provides
clarification to the body of law surrounding unfair or deceptive acts or
practices. In adopting the rule, the Agencies drew on the statutory
definition of what constitutes an “unfair” act or practice under the FTC Act,
and also drew on the definition of what constitutes a “deceptive” act or
practice under applicable FTC guidance. The Agencies identified five
credit card practices that they conclusively determined to be unfair, and
therefore unlawful under the FTC Act. Furthermore, the Agencies
reserved the right to regulate all other unfair or deceptive acts or practices
of banks on a case-by-case basis. The effective date of the final
rule is July 1, 2010.
Truth in Lending Act regulatory
amendments. In conjunction with issuing the joint, final rule
regarding unfair or deceptive acts or practices, the Federal Reserve also
adopted a final rule amending regulations that implement the Truth in Lending
Act to revise the disclosures that consumers receive in connection with credit
card accounts and other revolving credit plans. The final rule
imposes new format, timing, and content requirements for credit card
applications and solicitations, as well as for the disclosures that consumers
receive with regard to open-end accounts. The effective date of the final rule
is July 1, 2010.
The Credit Card Accountability
Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009. In 2009, Congress
enacted the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act of
2009 (“CARD Act”), which brings significant changes to rules dealing with
consumer credit card accounts. The Federal Reserve has promulgated
certain rules implementing the CARD Act. The CARD Act makes numerous
changes to the Truth in Lending Act, affecting the marketing, underwriting,
pricing, billing and other aspects of the consumer credit card
business. Several provisions of the CARD Act became effective in
August 2009; others became effective in February 2010; and others will become
effective in August 2010. Legislation has been proposed to accelerate
the effective date of all of the CARD Act provisions effective as soon as the
legislation is enacted, but prospects for enactment are uncertain. In
sum, the CARD Act, and its implementing regulations, demands greater
transparency within the industry. It requires that
credit card agreements be made publicly accessible, imposes notice requirements,
and imposes, among other things, restrictions on interest rate changes, billing,
fees, and the extension of credit to college students. The new law
could reduce credit availability, or increase the cost of credit to cardholders,
possibly affecting our transaction volume and revenues.
- 30
-
The CARD Act also includes provisions
that impose limits and restrictions on certain prepaid (or “pay before”) card
products, including on fees. The Federal Reserve has proposed
implementing regulations with respect to these provisions. The
statutory provisions and implementing regulations may diminish the
attractiveness of these products to our customers and may consequently adversely
affect transaction volumes and revenues.
Truth in Savings Act regulatory
amendments. In conjunction with issuing the joint, final rule regarding
unfair or deceptive acts or practices, the Federal Reserve also adopted a final
rule amending its regulations that implement the Truth in Savings
Act. The final rule addresses depository institutions’ disclosure
practices related to overdrafts. The final rule extends to all
institutions the requirement to disclose on periodic statements the total
amounts charged for overdraft fees and returned items fees, for both the
statement period as well as the year-to-date. The final rule also
requires institutions that provide account balance information through an
automated system to provide a balance that excludes additional funds that may be
made available to cover overdrafts. The effective date of the final
rule was January 1, 2010.
Electronic Fund Transfer Act
regulatory amendments. The Federal Reserve has proposed a rule
addressing certain consumer protection proposals relating to the assessment of
overdraft fees by banks. One proposal involved a choice between
allowing consumers to either opt out or opt in to an institution’s overdraft
service for the payment of ATM and one-time debit card overdrafts before the
institution may charge a fee for the service. Another proposal
prohibited institutions from assessing a fee or charge for paying an overdraft
if the overdraft would not have occurred but for a debit hold placed on the
consumer’s account, provided that the amount of the hold exceeds the actual
transaction amount. The scope of this proposal was limited to debit card
transactions in which the actual transaction amount could generally be
determined by the merchant or other payee within a short period of time after an
institution authorizes the transaction. Until the rule is adopted in
a final form, we cannot assess whether it will materially affect our
operations.
Consumer Overdraft Consent
regulatory amendment. The Federal Reserve has promulgated a
final rule under Regulation E that requires financial institution to obtain an
accountholder’s consent prior to assessing any fees or charges in connection
with the payment of any consumer overdraft for any ATM or one-time debit
transaction. The rule requires financial institutions to 1) provide
the consumer with a notice explaining the overdraft service, 2) provide a
reasonable opportunity for the consumer to affirmatively consent to the service,
3) obtain the consumer’s affirmative consent to the institution’s payment of ATM
withdrawals or one-time debit card transactions pursuant to the institution’s
overdraft service, and 4) provide the consumer with written confirmation of the
consumer’s consent. Financial institutions must implement the rule no
later than July 1, 2010.
Federal Securities
Laws. The Company’s common stock is registered with the SEC
under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”). The Company is subject to information, proxy
solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements under the
Exchange Act.
Legislative and Regulatory
Activities. In 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives passed
the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009, which, among other
things, calls for the absorption of our primary federal regulator, OTS, into the
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. In addition, the reform
legislation provides for the establishment of a Consumer Financial Protection
Agency having broad authority to regulate providers of credit, savings, payment
and other consumer financial products and services; creates a new structure for
resolving troubled or failed financial institutions; requires certain
over-the-counter derivative transactions to be cleared in a central
clearinghouse and/or effected on the exchange; revises the assessment base for
the calculation of the FDIC assessments; and creates a structure to regulate
systemically important financial companies, including providing regulators with
the power to require such companies to sell or transfer assets and terminate
activities if they determine that the size or scope of activities of the company
pose a threat to the safety and soundness of the company or the financial
stability of the United States. Other proposals have been made both
domestically and internationally, including additional capital and liquidity
requirements and limitations on size or types of activity in which banks may
engage. The U.S. Senate is expected to consider its own version of
the legislation, addressing similar, but not identical issues.
New
statutes, regulations and guidance are regularly proposed and promulgated that
potentially contain wide-ranging changes to the statutes, regulations and
guidance impacting the competitive relationships of financial institutions
operating and doing business in the United States. We cannot predict
whether or in what form any proposed statute, regulation or other guidance will
be adopted or promulgated, or the extent to which the business of either the
Company or the Bank may be affected. These include potential changes
to the bankruptcy laws that could force modifications of mortgage loans
currently held by the Bank, issues involving the existing regulatory structure
in place to oversee the operations of the Bank and the Company, potential
mortgage reforms that could adversely affect the operations and current business
model of the Bank and/or the Company, as well as additional programs or changes
to existing government programs that the Bank and Company participate in and/or
really on for their current operations.
- 31
-
ITEM
1A.
|
RISK
FACTORS
|
RISK
FACTORS
Our business may
be adversely affected by conditions in the financial services industry and U.S.
and global credit markets. Beginning in the latter half of 2007 and
continuing into 2010, negative developments in the capital markets and the
economic recession have resulted in uncertainty in the financial markets in
general. Although there are some indicators of improving economic conditions,
there can be no assurance that such conditions will continue to improve and it
is also possible that conditions will again deteriorate. Factors such
as consumer spending, business investment, government spending and inflation all
affect the business and economic environment and, ultimately, the amount and
profitability of our business. Loan portfolio performances have
deteriorated at many institutions resulting from, among other factors, a weak
economy and a decline in the value of the collateral supporting their loans. The
competition for deposits has increased significantly due to liquidity concerns
at many of these same institutions. In an economic environment characterized by
higher unemployment, lower family income, lower corporate earnings, lower
business investment and lower consumer spending, stock prices of bank holding
companies, like ours, have been negatively affected by the current condition of
the financial markets, as has our ability, if needed, to raise capital or borrow
in the debt markets.
Dramatic
declines in the housing market over the past two years, with falling home prices
and increasing foreclosures, unemployment and under-employment, have negatively
impacted the credit performance of real estate related loans and resulted in
significant write-downs of asset values by financial
institutions. These write-downs have caused many financial
institutions to seek additional capital, to reduce or eliminate dividends, to
merge with larger and stronger institutions and, in some cases, to
fail. This market turmoil and tightening of credit have led to an
increased level of commercial and consumer delinquencies, lack of consumer
confidence, increased market volatility and widespread reduction of business
activity generally. The resulting economic pressure on consumers and
lack of confidence in the financial markets may cause adverse changes in payment
patterns, causing increases in delinquencies and default rates, which may impact
our charge-offs and provision for loan losses.
As a
result, there is a potential for new federal or state laws and regulations
regarding lending and funding practices and liquidity standards, and financial
institution regulatory agencies are expected to be very aggressive in responding
to concerns and trends identified in examinations. Negative developments in the
financial services industry and the impact of new legislation in response to
those developments could adversely impact our operations, including our ability
to originate or sell loans, and adversely impact our financial
performance.
There can be no
assurance that recently enacted legislation will help stabilize the U.S.
financial system. Since October 2008,
numerous legislative actions have been taken in response to the financial crisis
affecting the banking system and financial markets, including the
following:
|
·
|
EESA
was signed into law on October 3, 2008 in response to the financial crises
affecting the banking system and financial markets and going concern
threats to investment banks and other financial institutions. Pursuant to
EESA, the Treasury has the authority to, among other things, purchase up
to $700 billion of mortgages, mortgage-backed securities and certain other
financial instruments from financial institutions for the purpose of
stabilizing and providing liquidity to the U.S. financial
markets.
|
|
·
|
On
October 14, 2008, the Treasury announced the CPP under EESA, pursuant to
which it would purchase senior preferred stock and warrants to purchase
common stock from participating financial institutions. On
January 9, 2009, we entered into the Agreement with the Treasury providing
for our issuance of our Series A Preferred Stock and a Warrant to purchase
shares of our common stock to the Treasury in connection with the TARP
CPP.
|
|
·
|
On
September 9, 2009, the FDIC extended the increased deposit insurance
amount of $250,000 through December 31, 2013. In addition, on
August 26, 2009, the FDIC extended the TLGP, under which it would
temporarily guarantee certain new debt issued by insured banks and
qualifying bank holding companies and expand its insurance to cover all
non-interest bearing transaction accounts through June 30,
2010. The Company did not opt out of the TLGP so its
non-interest bearing transaction accounts are covered and it does not
expect to issue unsecured debt before the termination of that component of
the TLGP. Our participation in the TLGP will require the
payment of additional insurance premiums to the
FDIC. Additionally, we may be required to pay significantly
higher FDIC premiums in the future because market developments have
significantly depleted the Deposit Insurance Fund and reduced the ratio of
reserves to insured deposits. On February 27, 2009, the FDIC adopted
an interim rule to impose a 20 basis point emergency special assessment on
insured institutions. The assessment was based on deposits as
of June 30, 2009 and was collected on September 30, 2009. On
December 30, 2009, the FDIC required depository institutions to prepay the
deposit premiums that they expected to have to pay over the next three
years.
|
- 32
-
|
·
|
On
February 10, 2009, the Treasury announced the Financial Stability Plan
under the EESA, which is intended to further stabilize financial
institutions and stimulate lending across a broad range of economic
sectors.
|
|
·
|
On
February 17, 2009, President Obama signed the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009, or ARRA, a broad economic stimulus package that
included additional restrictions on, and potential additional regulation
of, financial institutions.
|
Each of
these programs was implemented to help stabilize and provide liquidity to the
financial system. There can be no assurance, however, as to the
actual impact that the EESA and its implementing regulations, the CPP, the
Financial Stability Plan, the ARRA, the FDIC programs, or any other governmental
program will have on the financial markets. The failure of the EESA,
ARRA, the FDIC or the U.S. government to stabilize the financial markets, and
the continuation or worsening of the current financial market conditions, could
have a material adverse affect on our business, our financial condition, the
results of our operations, our access to credit or the trading price of our
common stock as well as the financial condition of our customers. It
could also result in declines in our investment portfolio which could be
“other-than-temporary impairments.”
The FDIC has
imposed a special assessment on all FDIC-insured institutions, which decreased
our earnings in 2009, and future special assessment could adversely affect our
earnings in future periods. On February 27, 2009, the FDIC
adopted an interim rule to impose a 20 basis point emergency special assessment
on insured institutions. The assessment was based on deposits as of
June 30, 2009 and was collected on September 30, 2009. This
additional charge of $209,196 increased operating expenses during the year ended
December 31, 2009. The FDIC has indicated that future special
assessments are possible, although it has not determined the magnitude or timing
of any future assessment. Any such future assessments will decrease
our earnings.
The soundness of
other financial institutions could adversely affect us. Our
ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by
the actions and commercial soundness of other financial
institutions. Financial services institutions are interrelated as a
result of trading, clearing, counterparty or other relationships. As
a result, defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, one or more financial
services institutions, or the financial services industry generally, have led to
market-wide liquidity problems and could lead to losses or defaults by us or by
other institutions. Many of these transactions expose us to credit
risk in the event of default of our counterparty or client. In
addition, our credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by us
cannot be relied upon or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the
full amount of the financial instrument exposure. There is no
assurance that any such losses would not materially and adversely affect our
results of operations.
Our local economy
may affect our future growth possibilities. We are in
uncertain economic times, including uncertainty with respect to financial
markets that have been volatile as a result of sub-prime mortgage related and
other matters. Unlike many larger institutions, we are not able to
spread the risks of unfavorable local economic conditions across a large number
of diversified economies and geographic locations. Our success
significantly depends upon the growth in population, income levels, deposits and
housing starts in our current market area, which is primarily located in
Webster, Story, Des Moines, Dallas, Polk, and Henry Counties,
Iowa. The financial crisis and recession has negatively impacted our
local economy and any further downturn in our local economy may further limit
funds available for deposits and may negatively affect our borrowers’ ability to
repay their loans on a timely basis. If the communities in which we
operate do not grow, or if prevailing economic conditions locally or nationally
are unfavorable or worsen, our business may not be successful. A continued
economic downturn would likely lead to a deterioration of the credit quality of
our loan portfolio and reduce our level of customer deposits, which in turn
would hurt our business. If the current economic conditions as a whole, or in
our geographic market areas, do not improve, borrowers may be less likely to
repay their loans as scheduled or at all. Moreover, the value of real
estate or other collateral that may secure our loans could be adversely
affected.
Our loan
portfolio includes loans with a higher risk of loss. We originate
commercial mortgage loans, including multifamily residential loans, commercial
business loans, consumer loans, and residential mortgage loans primarily within
our market area. We also purchase commercial mortgage loans, including
multifamily residential loans, and residential mortgage loans, primarily secured
by out of state properties, which entail certain risks not necessarily
associated with loans the Company originates. Commercial mortgage, commercial
business, and consumer loans may expose a lender to greater credit risk than
loans secured by residential real estate because the collateral securing these
loans may not be sold as easily as residential real estate. In addition,
commercial real estate and commercial business loans may also involve relatively
large loan balances to individual borrowers or groups of borrowers. These loans
also have greater credit risk than residential real estate for the following
reasons:
- 33
-
|
·
|
Commercial Mortgage
Loans. Repayment is dependent upon income being generated in
amounts sufficient to cover operating expenses and debt
service.
|
|
·
|
Commercial Loans. Repayment is
generally dependent upon the successful operation of the borrower’s
business.
|
|
·
|
Consumer
Loans. Consumer
loans (such as personal lines of credit) may or may not be collateralized
with assets that provide an adequate source of payment of the loan due to
depreciation, damage, or
loss.
|
Any
further downturn in the real estate market or local economy could adversely
affect the value of the properties securing the loans or revenues from the
borrower’s business thereby increasing the risk of non-performing
loans.
If our allowance
for loan losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, our earnings
could decrease. Given the high percentage of our assets
represented, directly or indirectly, by loans and the importance of lending to
our overall business, continued recessionary conditions are likely to have a
negative impact on our business, our ability to serve our customers and our
results of operations. If the current recessionary environment
continues or worsens, our loan customers may not repay their loans according to
their terms and the collateral securing the payment of these loans may be
insufficient to pay any remaining loan balance. We therefore may experience
significant loan losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our
operating results. Any further downturn in the real estate market or
local economy could exacerbate this risk.
Material
additions to our allowance for loan losses to reflect the risk of additional
unpaid loans also would materially decrease our net income, and the charge-off
of loans may cause us to increase the allowance. We make various assumptions and
judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the
creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate and other
assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans. We rely on
our loan quality reviews, our experience and our evaluation of economic
conditions, among other factors, in determining the amount of the allowance for
loan losses. If our assumptions prove to be incorrect, our allowance for loan
losses may not be sufficient to cover losses inherent in our loan portfolio,
resulting in additions to our allowance.
The results of
our operations may be adversely affected if asset valuations cause
other-than-temporary impairment charges. We may
be required to record future impairment charges on our
investment securities if they suffer declines in value that are considered
other-than-temporary. Numerous factors, including lack of liquidity for re-sales
of certain investment securities, absence of reliable pricing information for
investment securities, adverse changes in business climate, adverse actions by
regulators, or unanticipated changes in the competitive environment could have a
negative effect on the Company’s investment portfolio in future periods. If an
impairment charge is significant enough it could affect the ability of the Bank
to upstream dividends to the Company, which could have a material adverse effect
on the Company’s liquidity and its ability to pay dividends to shareholders and
could also negatively impact its regulatory capital ratios and result in the
Bank not being classified as “well capitalized” for regulatory
purposes.
Changes in
interest rates could adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition. Our profitability, like that of most financial institutions,
depends substantially on our net interest income, which is the difference
between the interest income earned on our interest-earning assets and the
interest expense paid on our interest-bearing liabilities. Increases in interest
rates may decrease loan demand and make it more difficult for borrowers to repay
adjustable rate loans. In addition, as market interest rates rise, we will have
competitive pressures to increase the rates we pay on deposits, which could
result in a decrease of our net interest income.
We also
are subject to reinvestment risk associated with changes in interest rates.
Changes in interest rates may affect the average life of loans and
mortgage-related securities. Decreases in interest rates can result in increased
prepayments of loans and mortgage-related securities as borrowers refinance to
reduce borrowing costs. Under these circumstances, we are subject to
reinvestment risk to the extent that we are unable to reinvest the cash received
from such prepayments at rates that are comparable to the rates on existing
loans and securities.
Our
earnings may be adversely impacted by an increase in interest rates because a
significant portion of our interest-earning assets are long-term, fixed rate
mortgage-related assets that will not reprice as long-term interest rates
increase while a majority of our interest-bearing liabilities are expected to
reprice as interest rates increase. Therefore, in an increasing interest rate
environment, our cost of funds could increase more rapidly than the yields
earned on our loan portfolio and securities portfolio. An increasing rate
environment could cause a narrowing of our net interest rate spread and a
decrease in our net interest income.
- 34
-
We depend on our
executive officers and key personnel to continue the implementation of our
long-term business strategy and could be harmed by the loss of their
services. We believe that our continued growth and future success will
depend in large part upon the skills of our management team. The competition for
qualified personnel in the financial services industry is intense, and the loss
of our key personnel or an inability to continue to attract, retain and motivate
key personnel could adversely affect our business. We cannot assure you that we
will be able to retain our existing key personnel or attract additional
qualified personnel. Although we have employment agreements with our president
and chief executive officer and our executive vice president that each contain a
non-compete provision, the loss of the services of one or more of our executive
officers and key personnel could impair our ability to continue to develop our
business strategy.
In
addition, because of our participation in the CPP, we are subject to standards
on compensation paid to our executives imposed by the Treasury. The
standards include (1) limits on compensation that exclude incentives for
the Company’s Senior Executive Officers to take unnecessary and excessive risks
that threaten the value of the Company; (2) a provision for the recovery of any
bonus, retention award, or incentive compensation paid to the Company’s Senior
Executive Officers or to any of the Company’s next twenty most highly
compensated employees based on certain financial statements or other criteria
that are later found to be materially inaccurate; (3) a prohibition on the
Company from making any payments to the Senior Executive Officers or to any of
the next five most highly compensated employees for departure from the Company
for any reason, except for payments for services performed or benefits accrued;
(4) a prohibition on the Company’s ability to pay bonuses and certain other
compensation to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, except with respect to
certain restricted stock awards or to the extent that a bonus is required by a
valid employment contract; (5) a prohibition on any compensation plan that would
encourage manipulation of the Company’s reported earnings for the purposes of
enhancing employee compensation; (6) a requirement for the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide certain certifications
regarding the foregoing; (7) certain requirements with respect to the Company’s
Personnel and Compensation Committee; (8) a requirement to adopt a company-wide
policy regarding excessive or luxury expenditures; (9) a requirement to permit a
nonbinding “say on pay” shareholder vote to be included in the Company’s proxy
statement with respect to an annual meeting of stockholders; and (10)
authorizing the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury to review certain compensation
paid to the Company’s Senior Executive Officers and the next 20 most
highly-compensated employees to determine whether any such payments were
inconsistent with the purposes of the foregoing. Since these restrictions
apply until the Treasury no longer holds any of the Series A Preferred Stock or
Warrant, we could potentially be subject to these restrictions
indefinitely. These restrictions could limit our ability to attract
and retain key managerial talent.
We operate in a
highly regulated environment, and changes in laws and regulations to which we
are subject may adversely affect our results of operations. We are
subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by the OTS, as the
Bank’s chartering authority, and by the FDIC as the insurer of our deposits up
to certain limits. In addition, the OTS regulates and oversees the Company as a
savings and loan holding company. We also belong to the
Federal Home Loan Bank System and, as a member of such system; we are subject to
certain limited regulations promulgated by the FHLB of Des Moines. This
regulation and supervision limits the activities in which we may engage. The
purpose of regulation and supervision is primarily to protect our depositors and
borrowers and, in the case of FDIC regulation, the FDIC’s insurance fund.
Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in the exercise of their
supervisory and enforcement powers. They may, among other things, impose
restrictions on the operation of a banking institution, the classification of
assets by such institution and such institution’s allowance for loan losses.
Regulatory and law enforcement authorities also have wide discretion and
extensive enforcement powers under various consumer protection and civil rights
laws, including the Truth-in-Lending Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the
Fair Housing Act, and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. It is possible
that the new administration could make significant changes to the regulatory
framework applicable to banks and bank holding companies. Any change
in the laws or regulations applicable to us, or in banking regulators’
supervisory policies or examination procedures, whether by the OTS, the FDIC,
other state or federal regulators, the United States Congress or the Iowa
legislature could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Competition in
our primary market area may reduce our ability to attract and retain deposits
and originate loans. We operate in a competitive market for both
attracting deposits, which is our primary source of funds, and originating
loans. Historically, our most direct competition for savings deposits has come
from credit unions, community banks, large commercial banks and thrift
institutions in our primary market area. Particularly in times of extremely low
or extremely high interest rates, we have faced additional significant
competition for investors’ funds from brokerage firms and other firms’
short-term money market securities and corporate and government securities. Our
competition for loans comes principally from mortgage brokers, commercial banks,
other thrift institutions, and insurance companies. Such competition for the
origination of loans may limit our future growth and earnings prospects.
Competition for loan originations and deposits may limit our future growth and
earnings prospects.
- 35
-
If external funds
were not available, this could adversely impact our growth and
prospects. We rely on retail deposits, brokered deposits, the
amortization and prepayment of loans, the maturity and calls of investment
securities, our operations and advances from the FHLB of Des Moines to fund our
operations. Although we have historically been able to replace maturing deposits
and advances as necessary, we might not be able to replace such funds in the
future if, among other things, our results of operations or financial condition
or the results of operations or financial condition of the FHLB of Des Moines or
market conditions were to change. In addition, if we fall below the FDIC’s
thresholds to be considered “well capitalized” we will be unable to continue
with uninterrupted access to the brokered funds markets. In addition, certain
Federal Home Loan Banks have experienced lower earnings from time to time and
paid out lower dividends to its members. Future problems at the Federal Home
Loan Banks may impact the collateral necessary to secure borrowings and limit
the borrowings extended to its member banks, require additional capital
contributions by its member banks, and reduce or eliminate the dividend paid by
the FHLB of Des Moines. Should this occur, we could have difficulty meeting our
short term liquidity needs and the Bank’s net interest income could be
affected. In addition, future problems at the Federal Home Loan Banks
could also cause the value of the equity investment we have in the stock of FHLB
of Des Moines to decline or become impaired. As of December 31, 2009,
we held approximately $3.9 million in FHLB of Des Moines stock, representing
approximately 0.86 percent of our total assets.
We may not be
able to raise capital in the future on acceptable terms or at
all. We are required by federal and state regulatory
authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. We
anticipate our capital resources, in part as a result of the sale of the Series
A Preferred Stock to the Treasury, will satisfy our capital requirements for the
foreseeable future. We may at some point, however, need to raise additional
capital to support our continued growth.
Our
ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on conditions in the
capital markets at that time, which are outside our control, and on our
financial performance. Accordingly, we cannot assure you of our ability to raise
additional capital if needed on terms acceptable to us. If we cannot raise
additional capital when needed, our ability to satisfy regulatory capital
requirements or expand our operations through internal growth and acquisitions
could be materially impaired.
Our prior branch
expansion may reduce our short-term profitability due to one-time fixed expenses
coupled with low levels of income earned by the branch until its customer base
is built. We opened a new branch in West Des Moines, Iowa in
2006 and may open additional new branches in the future. The expense
associated with building and staffing new branches will significantly increase
our noninterest expense, with compensation and occupancy costs constituting the
largest amount of increased costs. Losses are expected from new branches for
some time as the expenses associated with them are largely fixed and typically
greater than the income earned as a branch builds up its customer base. There
can be no assurance that our branch expansion strategy will result in increased
earnings, or that it will result in increased earnings within a reasonable
period of time. We expect that the success of our branching strategy will depend
largely on the ability of our staff to market the deposit and loan products
offered by us.
If we fail to
maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we
may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud,
and, as a result, investors and depositors could lose confidence in our
financial reporting, which could adversely affect our business, the trading
price of our stock and our ability to attract additional
deposits. Beginning with our annual report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, we had to include a report of our
management regarding internal control over financial reporting. If we
fail to identify and correct any significant deficiencies in the design or
operating effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting or fail
to prevent fraud, current and potential stockholders and depositors could lose
confidence in our financial reporting, which could adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations, the trading price of
our stock and our ability to attract additional deposits.
Our Articles of
Incorporation and bylaws may prevent a transaction you may favor or limit our
growth opportunities, which could cause the market price of our common stock to
decline. Certain provisions of our articles of incorporation, including
the certificate of designations with respect to the Series A Preferred Stock,
(the “Articles of Incorporation”) and bylaws and applicable provisions of Iowa
and federal law and regulations may delay, inhibit or prevent an organization or
person from gaining control of the Company through a tender offer, business
combination, proxy contest or some other method, even though you might be in
favor of the transaction.
We may not be
able to pay dividends in the future in accordance with past practice and our
ability to increase future dividends is subject to the Treasury’s
consent. Our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders is
primarily dependent on the Bank’s earnings. The payment of dividends
also is subject to legal and regulatory restrictions. Any payment of dividends
in the future will depend, in large part, on the Bank’s earnings, capital
requirements, financial condition and other factors considered relevant by North
Central’s board of directors. In addition, the agreements governing
the issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock and the Warrant in connection with
the TARP CPP restrict our ability to pay dividends in certain circumstances and
to increase our dividend without the Treasury’s consent. As long as there is
Series A Preferred Stock outstanding, no dividends may be paid on our common
stock unless all dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock have been paid in
full.
- 36
-
The Series A
Preferred Stock and Warrant issued to the Treasury in connection with the TARP
CPP will impact net income available to our common stockholders and our earnings
per share. The dividends declared on our Series A Preferred
Stock will reduce the net income available to common stockholders and our
earnings per common share. Additionally, the Warrant to purchase our
common stock issued to the Treasury in conjunction with the Series A Preferred
Stock may be dilutive to our earnings per share. The Series A
Preferred Stock will also receive preferential treatment in the event of
liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our business.
The Series A
Preferred Stock is equity and is subordinate to all of our existing and future
indebtedness. Regulatory and contractual restrictions may limit or prevent us
from paying dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock and our common stock, and
the Series A Preferred Stock places no limitations on the amount of indebtedness
we and our subsidiaries may incur in the future. Shares of the
Series A Preferred Stock are equity interests in North Central and do not
constitute indebtedness. As such, the Series A Preferred Stock, like our common
stock, ranks junior to all indebtedness and other non-equity claims on North
Central with respect to assets available to satisfy claims on North Central,
including in a liquidation of North Central. Additionally, unlike indebtedness,
where principal and interest would customarily be payable on specified due
dates, in the case of preferred stock like the Series A Preferred Stock, as with
our common stock, (1) dividends are payable only when, as and if authorized
and declared by, our Board and depend on, among other things, our results of
operations, financial condition, debt service requirements, other cash needs and
any other factors our Board deems relevant, and (2) as an Iowa corporation,
under Iowa law we are subject to restrictions on payments of dividends out of
lawfully available funds.
In
addition, the Series A Preferred Stock does not limit the amount of debt or
other obligations we or our subsidiaries may incur in the future. Accordingly,
we and our subsidiaries may incur substantial amounts of additional debt and
other obligations that will rank senior to the Series A Preferred Stock or to
which the Series A Preferred Stock will be structurally
subordinated.
There may be
future sales of additional common stock or preferred stock or other dilution of
our equity, which may adversely affect the market price of our common stock or
the Series A Preferred Stock. We are not restricted from
issuing additional common stock or preferred stock, including any securities
that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to
receive, common stock or preferred stock or any substantially similar
securities. The per share value of our common stock or the Series A Preferred
Stock could decline as a result of sales by us of a large number of shares of
common stock or preferred stock or similar securities in the market or the
perception that such sales could occur.
Holders of the
Series A Preferred Stock have limited voting rights. Until and
unless we are in arrears on our dividend payments on the Series A Preferred
Stock for six dividend periods, whether or not consecutive, the holders of the
Series A Preferred Stock will have no voting rights except with respect to
certain fundamental changes in the terms of the Series A Preferred Stock and
certain other matters and except as may be required by Iowa law. If dividends on
the Series A Preferred Stock are not paid in full for six dividend periods,
whether or not consecutive, the total number of positions on the North Central
Board will automatically increase by two and the holders of the Series A
Preferred Stock, acting as a class with any other parity securities having
similar voting rights, will have the right to elect two individuals to serve in
the new director positions. This right and the terms of such directors will end
when we have paid in full all accrued and unpaid dividends for all past dividend
periods.
If we are unable
to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock after five years, we will be required to
make higher dividend payments on this stock, thereby substantially increasing
our cost of capital. If we are unable to redeem the Series A
Preferred Stock prior to February 15, 2014, the dividend rate will increase
substantially on that date, from 5.0% per annum to 9.0% per annum. Depending on
our financial condition at the time, this increase in the annual dividend rate
on the Series A Preferred Stock could have a material negative effect on our
liquidity, our net income available to common shareholders, and our earnings per
share.
ITEM
1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
Not
applicable.
- 37
-
ITEM
2.
|
PROPERTIES
|
The
Company conducts its business through its main office located in Fort Dodge,
Iowa and ten full-service offices located in Fort Dodge (2), Nevada, Ames,
Perry, Ankeny, Clive, West Des Moines, Burlington (2) and Mount Pleasant, Iowa.
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the main office
and each branch office of the Company and the offices of First Iowa Title
Services at December 31, 2009. In addition to the properties listed
below, First Federal Investments owned land and an office building in Fort
Dodge, Iowa, Northridge Partnership owned a multifamily apartment building in
Fort Dodge, Iowa and Northridge Partnership II owned a multifamily apartment
building in Fort Dodge, Iowa at December 31, 2009.
Location
|
Opening
Date
|
Own/Lease
Expiration
Date
|
||
Main
Office:
|
||||
825
Central Avenue
|
1973
|
Own
|
||
Fort
Dodge, Iowa
|
||||
Branch
Offices:
|
||||
201
South 25th Street
|
1977
|
Own
|
||
Fort
Dodge, Iowa
|
||||
404
Lincolnway
|
1977
|
Own
|
||
Nevada,
Iowa
|
||||
316
South Duff
|
1995
|
Own
|
||
Ames,
Iowa
|
||||
1111-141st
Street
|
1999
|
Own
|
||
Perry,
Iowa
|
||||
321
North Third Street
|
1953
|
Own
|
||
Burlington,
Iowa
|
||||
1010
North Roosevelt
|
1975
|
Own
|
||
Burlington,
Iowa
|
||||
102
South Main
|
1991
|
Own
|
||
Mount
Pleasant, Iowa
|
||||
2110
SE Delaware
|
2002
|
Own
|
||
Ankeny,
Iowa
|
||||
13150
Hickman Road
|
2003
|
Own
|
||
Clive,
Iowa
|
||||
120
South 68th
Street
|
2006
|
Own
|
||
West
Des Moines, Iowa
|
||||
First
Iowa Title Offices:
|
||||
628
Central Avenue
|
1982
|
Own
|
||
Fort
Dodge, Iowa
|
||||
814
8th Street
|
1994
|
2010
|
||
Boone,
Iowa
|
|
|
- 38
-
ITEM
3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
The
Company is not involved in any pending legal proceedings other than routine
legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business. Such
routine legal proceedings, in the aggregate, are believed by management to be
immaterial to the Company’s financial condition and results of
operations.
ITEM
4.
|
RESERVED
|
PART
II
ITEM
5.
|
MARKET
FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Information
required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to pages 19 through 21
of the Company’s 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders under the heading
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources” and page 32 “Shareholder
Information,” incorporated by reference to Exhibit 13.1 to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. See Part II, Item 12, for the equity compensation plan
information required by this Item.
There
were no purchases made by or on behalf of the Company or any “affiliated
purchases” (as defined in rule 10b-18(a) (3) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934), of the Company’s common stock during the three months ended December
31, 2009. As of December 31, 2009, there were 64,250 shares of common
stock that may yet be purchased as part of the Company’s previously publicly
announced repurchase plan. However, as a result of participating in
the TARP CPP, the Company is currently restricted from repurchasing its common
stock without prior consent of the Treasury.
ITEM
6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
The
information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to page 4
of the Company’s 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders under the heading “Selected
Financial Data,” incorporated by reference to Exhibit 13.1 to this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
ITEM
7.
|
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The
information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to pages 7
through 21 of the Company’s 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders under the heading
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations,” incorporated by reference to Exhibit 13.1 to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
ITEM
7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
|
The
information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to pages
22 through 29 of the Company’s 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders under the
heading “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk,”
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 13.1 to this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
ITEM
8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
The
information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to pages
36 through 81 of the Company’s 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders under the
headings “Independent Auditor’s Report,” “Consolidated Financial Statements” and
“Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,” incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 13.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM
9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
|
None.
- 39
-
ITEM
9A(T).
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management
is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting for the Company. Internal control over the
Company’s financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the
Chief Executive Officer and Interim Principal Accounting Officer to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation
of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management
has made a comprehensive review, evaluation, and assessment of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. In
making its assessment of internal control over financial reporting, management
used the criteria issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based
on that assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, the
internal control over financial reporting was effective.
This
Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of the
Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over
financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to
attestation by the registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules
of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide
only management’s report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management
conducted an evaluation, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer
and Interim Principal Accounting Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) as of December 31, 2009. The disclosure controls and
procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
the Company in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported on a timely
basis.
Based
upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Interim Principal
Accounting Officer concluded, as of December 31, 2009, that the Company’s
disclosure controls and procedures were effective in recording, processing,
summarizing, and reporting information required to be disclosed by the Company,
within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and such
information is accumulated and communicated to management to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosures.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has
been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
identified in connection with the evaluation that occurred during the Company’s
last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or that is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
ITEM
9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
None.
- 40
-
PART
III
ITEM
10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
|
Information
regarding directors and executive officers of the Registrant is included under
the headings “Information with Respect to Nominees and Continuing Directors,”
“Nominees for Election as Directors,” “Continuing Directors,” “Executive
Officers Who Are Not Directors or Nominees,” “Board and Committee Meetings,” and
“Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Company’s Proxy
Statement for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 23, 2010,
which has been filed with the SEC and is incorporated herein by
reference.
The
Company and the Bank have adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics which applies to
all employees, officers and directors of the Company. The Company has
also adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers of North Central
Bancshares, Inc., which applies to the Company’s principal executive officer,
principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or
person performing similar functions for the Company. The Code of
Ethics for Senior Financial Officers of the Company meets the requirements of a
“code of ethics” as defined by Item 406 of Regulation S-K.
ITEM
11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
Information
relating to executive compensation is included under the heading “Executive
Compensation” in the Company’s Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on April 23, 2010, which has been filed with the SEC and
is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM
12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
Information
relating to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is
included under the headings “Principal Shareholders of the Company” and
“Security Ownership of Management” in the Company’s Proxy Statement for its
Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 23, 2010, which has been
filed with the SEC and is incorporated herein by reference.
The
following table sets forth the aggregate information of our equity compensation
plans in effect as of December 31, 2009.
Number of securities
|
||||||||||||
remaining available for future
|
||||||||||||
Number of securities
|
issuance under equity
|
|||||||||||
to be issued upon
|
Weighted-average
|
compensation plans
|
||||||||||
Plan category
|
exercise of outstanding
|
exercise price of
|
(excluding securities reflected
|
|||||||||
options
|
outstanding options
|
in column (a))
|
||||||||||
a
|
b
|
c
|
||||||||||
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders
|
48,200 | 29.10 | 110,605 | |||||||||
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders (1)
|
17,000 | 38.38 | - | |||||||||
Total
|
65,200 | 31.52 | 110,605 |
(1)
|
The
equity compensation plan not approved by shareholders is that portion of
the 1996 Stock Option Plan which granted nonqualified options to directors
and officers out of a pool of 40,000 shares reserved to the plan without
shareholder approval.
|
(2)
|
Shares
remaining from North Central Bancshares, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan
approved by shareholders on April 28, 2006. See Note 11
included with the financial statements of the annual report to the
shareholders.
|
ITEM
13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
Information
regarding certain relationships and related transactions is included under the
heading “Transactions with Certain Related Persons” and “Board of Directors and
Management” in the Company’s Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on April 23, 2010, which has been filed with the SEC and
is incorporated herein by reference.
- 41
-
ITEM
14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
Information regarding the aggregate
fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years by the Company’s principal
accountant is included under the heading “Principal Accountant Fees and
Services” and “Audit Committee Preapproval Policy” in the Company’s Proxy
Statement for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 23, 2010,
which has been filed with the SEC and is incorporated herein by
reference.
- 42
-
PART
IV
ITEM
15.
|
EXHIBITS,
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(a)
|
Financial
Statements, Schedules and Exhibits
|
|
1.
|
The
consolidated statements of financial condition of North Central
Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and
the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and
cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, together
with the related notes and the report of the independent registered public
accounting firm of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP are incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 13.1 to this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
|
|
2.
|
Financial
Statement Schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or
the required information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements
or Notes thereto.
|
|
3.
|
See
Exhibit Index on following
page.
|
- 43
-
(b)
|
Exhibits
|
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
Reference No.
|
||
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation of North Central Bancshares, Inc.
|
(1)
|
||
3.2
|
Bylaws
of North Central Bancshares, Inc., as amended
|
(3)
|
||
3.3
|
Articles
of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation establishing Series A
Preferred Stock
|
(4)
|
||
4.1
|
Federal
Stock Charter of First Federal Savings Bank of Iowa (formerly known as
First Federal Savings Bank of Fort Dodge)
|
(2)
|
||
4.3
|
Specimen
Stock Certificate of North Central Bancshares, Inc.
|
(2)
|
||
4.4
|
Bylaws
of First Federal Savings Bank of Iowa, as amended
|
(3)
|
||
4.5
|
Specimen
of stock certificate representing Series A Preferred
Stock.
|
(5)
|
||
4.6
|
Warrant
to Purchase up to 99,157 shares of Common Stock.
|
(5)
|
||
10.1
|
Tax
Allocation Agreement between North Central Bancshares, Inc. and
Subsidiaries
|
(3)
|
||
10.2+
|
North
Central Bancshares, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan
|
(6)
|
||
10.3+
|
Amendment
No. 1 to the North Central Bancshares, Inc. 1996 Stock Option
Plan
|
(7)
|
||
10.4+
|
Form
of Stock Option Agreement
|
(8)
|
||
10.5+
|
Employee
Stock Ownership Plan of First Federal Savings Bank of Iowa (formerly known
as First Federal Savings Bank of Fort Dodge) and ESOP Trust
Agreement
|
(2)
|
||
10.5A+
|
Amendment
#1 to Employee Stock Ownership Plan of First Federal Savings Bank of Iowa
(formerly known as First Federal Savings Bank of Fort Dodge) and ESOP
Trust Agreement
|
(9)
|
||
10.5B+
|
Amendment
#2 to Employee Stock Ownership Plan of First Federal Savings Bank of Iowa
(formerly known as First Federal Savings Bank of Fort Dodge) and ESOP
Trust Agreement
|
(9)
|
||
10.6+
|
ESOP
Loan Documents, dated September 3, 1996
|
(10)
|
||
10.7+
|
Employment
Agreement between First Federal Savings Bank of Iowa (formerly known as
First Federal Savings Bank of Fort Dodge) and David M. Bradley, amended
and restated as of December 14, 2007
|
(11)
|
||
10.8+
|
Form
of Employment Agreement between North Central Bancshares, Inc. and David
M. Bradley, amended and restated as of December 14, 2007
|
(11)
|
||
10.9+
|
Employment
Agreement between First Federal Savings Bank of Iowa and C. Thomas
Chalstrom, amended and restated as of December 14, 2007
|
(11)
|
||
10.10+
|
Employment
Agreement North Central Bancshares, Inc. and C. Thomas Chalstrom, amended
and restated as of December 14, 2007
|
(11)
|
||
10.11+
|
Employment
Agreement between First Federal Savings Bank of Iowa and Kyle C.
Cook
|
(11)
|
||
10.12+
|
Employment
Agreement between North Central Bancshares, Inc. and Kyle C.
Cook
|
(11)
|
||
10.13+
|
Amended
and Restated Retention Agreement between First Federal Savings Bank of
Iowa and Kirk A. Yung
|
(11)
|
||
10.14+
|
North
Central Bancshares, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan
|
(12)
|
||
10.15+
|
North
Central Bancshares, Inc. 2006 Incentive Award Plan
|
(13)
|
||
10.16+
|
Form
of Restricted Stock Award Notice
|
(14)
|
||
10.17+
|
Novation
of Employment Agreements
|
(15)
|
- 44
-
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
Reference No.
|
||
10.18
|
Letter
Agreement, dated January 9, 2009, including the Securities Purchase
Agreement – Standard Terms incorporated by reference therein, between the
Company and the United States Department of the Treasury.
|
(5)
|
||
10.19
|
Form
of Waiver, executed by each of David M. Bradley, Kyle C. Cook, C. Thomas
Chalstrom, and Kirk A. Yung.
|
(5)
|
||
10.20+
|
Form
of Omnibus Amendment Agreement, executed by each of David M. Bradley, Kyle
C. Cook, C. Thomas Chalstrom, and Kirk A. Yung.
|
(5)
|
||
10.21+
|
First
Federal Savings Bank of Iowa Supplemental Retirement and Deferred
Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1,
2005.
|
(16)
|
||
10.22+
|
Resignation,
Settlement, and Release Agreement dated as of December 31, 2009 between
First Federal Savings Bank of Iowa and Kyle C. Cook.
|
*
|
||
10.22+
|
Consulting
Services Agreement dated as of December 31, 2009 between First Federal
Savings Bank of Iowa and Kyle C. Cook.
|
*
|
||
13.1
|
North
Central Bancshares, Inc. 2009 Annual Report to
Shareholders
|
(17)
|
||
14.1
|
Code
of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers of North Central Bancshares,
Inc.
|
(3)
|
||
21.1
|
Subsidiaries
of the Registrant
|
*
|
||
23.1
|
Consent
of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
|
*
|
||
31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive
Officer
|
*
|
||
31.2
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Interim Principal Accounting
Officer
|
*
|
||
32.1
|
Section
1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
*
|
||
32.2
|
Section
1350 Certification of Interim Principal Accounting Officer
|
*
|
||
99.1
|
|
Section
30.15 Certification
|
|
*
|
+
|
Indicates
a management contract or compensatory plan or
arrangement.
|
*
|
Filed
herewith.
|
(1)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
SEC on August 12, 2009.
|
(2)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Registration Statement No. 33-80493 on Form S-1
filed with the SEC on December 18, 1995, as
amended.
|
(3)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC
on March 29, 2004.
|
(4)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC
on January 7, 2009.
|
(5)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC
on January 15, 2009.
|
(6)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Registration Statement No. 333-33089 on form S-8
filed with the SEC on August 7,
1997.
|
(7)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC
on March 31, 1998.
|
(8)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC
on July 3, 2007.
|
(9)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC
on March 29, 2002.
|
- 45
-
(10)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC
on March 31, 1997.
|
(11)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC
on December 20, 2007.
|
(12)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Registration Statement No. 333-133810 on form S-8
filed with the SEC on May 4, 2006.
|
(13)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
SEC on August 11, 2006.
|
(14)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC
on May 3, 2007.
|
(15)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
SEC on November 13, 2007.
|
(16)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC
on February 27, 2009.
|
(17)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to the Annual Report on Form ARS filed with the SEC on
March 12, 2010.
|
- 46
-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
North
Central Bancshares, Inc.
|
|
Date: March
12, 2010
|
/s/ David M. Bradley |
By: David M. Bradley | |
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name
|
Title
|
Date
|
||
/s/ David M. Bradley
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer, Director,
|
03/12/10
|
||
David
M. Bradley
|
and
Chairman of the Board
|
|||
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
||||
/s/ Craig A. Steen
|
Interim
Principal Accounting Officer
|
03/12/10
|
||
Craig
A. Steen
|
||||
|
||||
/s/ Robert H. Singer, Jr.
|
Director
|
03/12/10
|
||
Robert
H. Singer, Jr.
|
||||
/s/ Melvin R. Schroeder
|
Director
|
03/12/10
|
||
Melvin
R. Schroeder
|
||||
/s/ Mark M. Thompson
|
Director
|
03/12/10
|
||
Mark
M. Thompson
|
||||
/s/ Randall L. Minear
|
Director
|
03/12/10
|
||
Randall
L. Minear
|
||||
/s/ Paul F. Bognanno
|
Director
|
03/12/10
|
||
Paul
F. Bognanno
|
||||
/s/ C. Thomas Chalstrom
|
Director
|
03/12/10
|
||
C.
Thomas Chalstrom
|
- 47
-