Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-12.1 - EX-12.1 - LODGENET INTERACTIVE CORP | c56916exv12w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - LODGENET INTERACTIVE CORP | c56916exv31w2.htm |
EX-21.1 - EX-21.1 - LODGENET INTERACTIVE CORP | c56916exv21w1.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - LODGENET INTERACTIVE CORP | c56916exv31w1.htm |
EX-23.1 - EX-23.1 - LODGENET INTERACTIVE CORP | c56916exv23w1.htm |
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - LODGENET INTERACTIVE CORP | c56916exv32w1.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number: 0-22334
LodgeNet Interactive Corporation
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 46-0371161 | |
(State of Incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification Number) | |
3900 West Innovation Street, Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57107
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(605) 988 1000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: | Common Stock, $.01 par value. Registered on the NASDAQ Global Select Market |
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: | None. |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part
III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer o | Accelerated Filer þ | Non-accelerated Filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold,
or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the
registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter. $72,637,829
The number of shares of common stock of the Registrant outstanding as of March 8, 2010, was
22,541,164 shares.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the Registrants definitive proxy statement for
the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed within 120 days of the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009, are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.
Table of Contents
1 | ||||||||
1 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
9 | ||||||||
10 | ||||||||
13 | ||||||||
15 | ||||||||
16 | ||||||||
16 | ||||||||
17 | ||||||||
18 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
30 | ||||||||
32 | ||||||||
32 | ||||||||
33 | ||||||||
37 | ||||||||
38 | ||||||||
39 | ||||||||
43 | ||||||||
44 | ||||||||
45 | ||||||||
50 | ||||||||
52 | ||||||||
52 | ||||||||
53 | ||||||||
53 | ||||||||
54 | ||||||||
54 | ||||||||
54 | ||||||||
55 | ||||||||
55 | ||||||||
55 | ||||||||
55 | ||||||||
55 | ||||||||
56 | ||||||||
EX-12.1 | ||||||||
EX-21.1 | ||||||||
EX-23.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 |
As used herein (unless the context otherwise requires) LodgeNet and/or the Registrant, as well
as the terms we, us and our refer to LodgeNet Interactive Corporation (f/k/a LodgeNet
Entertainment Corporation) and its consolidated subsidiaries.
LodgeNet, LodgeNetRX, On Command, The Hotel Networks and the LodgeNet logo are trademarks
or registered trademarks of LodgeNet Interactive Corporation. All rights reserved. All other
trademarks or service marks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1 Business
Overview
We are the largest provider of interactive media and connectivity solutions to the hospitality
industry in the United States, Canada and Mexico. We also provide interactive television solutions
in select international markets, primarily through local or regional licensees. As of December 31,
2009, we provided interactive media and connectivity solutions to approximately 1.9 million hotel
rooms. In addition, we sell and maintain interactive television systems which provide on-demand
patient education, information and entertainment to healthcare facilities throughout the United
States. As of December 31, 2009, our systems were installed in 45 healthcare facilities,
representing approximately 9,200 beds.
The interactive media and connectivity solutions we offer the hospitality industry generally
include guest-paid entertainment content, cable television programming, broadband Internet access
systems, and professional technical and installation services. We provide a wide range of
guest-paid entertainment options, including movies, games, music and other interactive services
delivered through the television. We refer to these offerings as Guest Entertainment content,
which guests typically purchase on a per-view, hourly, or daily basis. We also provide services
for which hotels pay us a monthly service fee, which we refer to as Hotel Services. These
offerings include cable television programming and Internet access customer support services, as
well as video, Internet and technical support services. We also deliver advertising-supported
media into select segments of our interactive television room base, from which we earn revenue from
the sale of television commercials or other marketing-based programs. Lastly, we also sell Internet
access and interactive television systems and equipment to hotels, including related professional
design, project management and installation services. These services are reported under System
Sales and Related Services.
In the healthcare industry, we sell a variety of solutions, including the LodgeNetRXTM
Interactive Patient Television System, patient education solutions, clinical systems integration
applications, cable television hardware and programming and professional technical and installation
services. We generate revenue from the sale of the system hardware, software license and
installation services. Additionally, we earn recurring revenues from the sale of on-demand and
television entertainment content, patient education content, software maintenance and technical
support services.
During 2010, our business goal is to continue to proactively manage our business through the
evolving economic environment, with strategies which will drive long-term shareholder value and
maintain full compliance with the covenants of our Credit Facility. In furtherance of this goal,
we are focusing on (a) reinvigorating our interactive television through new high-definition
television (HDTV) offerings and innovative content, promotions and interactive applications; (b)
driving the continued growth of our diversified revenue initiatives from the sale of additional
services and systems to hotels, healthcare facilities and international licensees; (c) exploring
additional diversification opportunities; and (d) managing our level of capital investment activity
to our targeted level of free cash flow performance.
1
Table of Contents
The following table presents selected operations data for the period 2005 through 2009. In
2007, LodgeNet acquired the assets of StayOnline, Inc. and the stock of Ascent Entertainment Group,
Inc., which owned 100% of the capital stock of On Command Corporation. These acquisitions
substantially increased our Hospitality room base and affected the financial results for 2007.
Dollar amounts are in thousands, except for room data:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Financial Highlights: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 484,492 | $ | 533,879 | $ | 485,588 | $ | 288,213 | $ | 275,771 | ||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
21,692 | (5,071 | ) | (4,236 | ) | 26,932 | 22,693 | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization (1) |
100,309 | 124,060 | 116,378 | 66,311 | 69,862 | |||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation and restricted stock |
1,724 | 2,275 | 1,737 | 1,677 | 288 | |||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
(10,155 | ) | (48,418 | ) | (65,172 | ) | 1,841 | (6,959 | ) | |||||||||||
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders |
$ | (13,269 | ) | $ | (48,418 | ) | $ | (65,172 | ) | $ | 1,841 | $ | (6,959 | ) | ||||||
Selected Operations Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Hospitality |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total rooms served (2) (7) |
1,909,323 | 1,977,015 | 1,962,090 | 1,052,025 | 1,053,806 | |||||||||||||||
Total Guest Entertainment rooms (3) (7) (9) |
1,779,979 | 1,866,353 | 1,860,720 | 1,004,937 | 1,001,929 | |||||||||||||||
Total High Definition rooms (4) (9) |
231,588 | 191,491 | 84,327 | 23,502 | 259 | |||||||||||||||
Percentage of Total Guest Entertainment rooms |
13.0 | % | 10.3 | % | 4.5 | % | 2.3 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||
Total Television Programming (FTG) rooms (5) (9) |
1,087,860 | 1,105,754 | 1,068,256 | 535,777 | 536,984 | |||||||||||||||
Percentage of Total Guest Entertainment rooms |
61.1 | % | 59.2 | % | 57.4 | % | 53.3 | % | 53.6 | % | ||||||||||
Total Broadband Internet rooms (6) (9) |
201,936 | 229,003 | 218,860 | 37,686 | 33,175 | |||||||||||||||
Advertising |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total Advertising and Media Services rooms (8) (9) |
1,207,465 | 893,738 | 716,219 | | | |||||||||||||||
Healthcare |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total Hospitals installed |
45 | 28 | 20 | 11 | 3 |
(1) | Includes amortization of acquired intangibles. | |
(2) | Total rooms served include rooms receiving one or more of our services, including rooms served by international licensees. The increase from 2006 to 2007 is due primarily to the addition of the On Command room base of approximately 830,000 rooms. | |
(3) | Guest Entertainment rooms are equipped with our interactive television systems. | |
(4) | High Definition rooms are equipped with high-definition video-on-demand capabilities. | |
(5) | Television programming (which we refer to as free-to-guest or FTG) rooms receiving basic or premium television programming. | |
(6) | Represents rooms receiving high-speed Internet service. The increase from 2006 to 2007 is due to the addition of the StayOnline and On Command room bases of approximately 137,000 and 12,000 rooms, respectively. | |
(7) | Total room count was reduced as a result of Hurricane Katrina by 4,053 rooms in 2006 and 8,195 rooms in 2005. | |
(8) | Includes rooms receiving satellite-delivered and server-based channels. | |
(9) | Included in total rooms served. |
2
Table of Contents
Overview of Markets Served
HOSPITALITY
In the hospitality market, we provide our interactive media and connectivity solutions to hotel
customers and their guests throughout the United States, Canada and Mexico, and through licensing
arrangements with companies in other select countries. Our hospitality business is focused on:
Guest Entertainment services, which includes products guests purchase on a pay-per-view or similar
basis, Hotel Services and System Sales and Related Services, which include business-to-business
products and services sold directly to hotels and do not involve guest purchases. Our strategy is
to maximize and rationalize our traditional Guest Entertainment business, while we develop new
products and services to grow diversified, new revenue within our Hotel Services and System Sales
and Related Services over time. Most of the potential diversified revenue sources are focused on
products and services which require limited capital investment by us.
Markets and Customers
United States, Canadian and Mexican Market. The primary market for our interactive media solutions
is the mid-size and large hotel segments within the United States, Canada and Mexico. Based on
industry sources, we estimate these segments account for approximately 68%, or 3.9 million, of the
lodging industrys estimated 5.7 million rooms. We estimate the target demographic which meets our
required return on investment accounts for approximately 2.5 million video-on-demand and/or cable
programming rooms.
Diversified Customer Base. We believe our hotel base is well diversified in terms of (i) location;
(ii) demographics; and (iii) customer contracts. As of December 31, 2009, no single state or
province accounted for more than 11% of the hotel properties served by us. We provide our services
to various hotel chains, ownership groups and management companies representing some of the finest
hotels in the world, including Marriott International, Inc. (J.W. Marriott, Ritz-Carlton,
Renaissance, Courtyard by Marriott, Fairfield Inn & Suites, Residence Inn, Springhill Suites and
Towne Place Suites); Hilton Worldwide (Hilton, Doubletree, Embassy Suites, Hampton Inn & Suites,
Hilton Garden Inn, Homewood Suites, Conrad Hotels & Resorts and The Waldorf Astoria Collection);
Starwood Hotels & Resorts (aloft, Element, Westin, W Hotels, Sheraton, Four Points by Sheraton and
The Luxury Collection); Hyatt Hotels Corporation (Andaz, Hyatt, Hyatt Regency, Park Hyatt and Hyatt
Place); Four Seasons, Fairmont; Harrahs; Kimpton Hotels & Restaurants; Wyndham Hotels & Resorts
(Wyndham, Wyndham Garden, Wingate by Wyndham); Gaylord Hotels; Omni Hotels; Loews Hotels,
Outrigger; Grand Casino; Felcor; Interstate; John Q. Hammons, Davidson Hotels, Winegardner &
Hammons; Las Vegas Sands Corporation (Venetian Resort Hotel Casino, Four Seasons Hotel Macau, Sands
Macau Hotel, Venetian Macau Resort Hotel); and Sage Hospitality, as well as many independent
properties. During 2009, hotels covered by the master services agreements with Hilton Worldwide
and Marriott International represented approximately 18.8% and 17.8%, respectively, of our
consolidated revenue. As most of the hotels served under the Hilton agreement are owned by
independent franchisees, the number of Hilton-owned properties accounted for approximately 1.1% of
consolidated revenue. There were no Marriott-owned properties served under the Marriott agreement.
Each property is subject to an individual long-term property level agreement. No other master
service agreement accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated revenue. Additionally, our room
base is geographically diversified, which mitigates our reliance on any one geographic sector.
We also provide services in select international markets through licensing arrangements with
companies in these areas. Under these arrangements, we sell the equipment and license our
interactive television system and technologies to the licensee and receive a royalty based on gross
revenue.
Financial information related to our domestic and international operations is included in Note 17
of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Internationally, we intend to continue to expand in
selected countries in Asia, South America, Europe and other regions through the sale of our
equipment and long-term licensing agreements or other arrangements with entities in those areas
which do not require capital investment by us.
3
Table of Contents
Products and Services
Guest Entertainment
Our primary source of revenue within the hospitality market is the sale of on-demand entertainment
content, which the hotel guest buys on a per-view, hourly or daily basis. We design, develop and
operate interactive television systems installed at hotel properties, and it is through these
systems our Guest Entertainment revenues are generated.
Our interactive television systems provide a broad array of guest entertainment and other
interactive services, including:
Ø | on-demand movies; | ||
Ø | on-demand television programming; | ||
Ø | on-demand digital music programming; | ||
Ø | daily subscription sports programming; | ||
Ø | on-screen controls that allow the guest more viewing control and flexibility; and | ||
Ø | interactive guest marketing and merchandising capabilities. |
The vast majority of these systems are owned by us, although, in some cases, hotels purchase the
systems from us. The interactive system connects each individual hotel room to a server, referred
to as the headend, located within the hotel. Because of the flexible and modular design of the
system architecture, we can typically upgrade our software and hardware to support the introduction
of new interactive services and integrate new technologies as they become commercially available
and economically viable.
In 2005, we began deploying a high-definition (HD) configuration of our digital system, which
allows the delivery of a variety of high-definition programming services to guest rooms. The HD
configuration uses the same content management and satellite distribution network as our standard
digital system; however, in the HD system, the content is sent in a digital format from the headend
server to a commercial, in-room digital television. In our standard digital systems, the content
is sent to the in-room television using an analog transport technology. The HD system utilizes
the Pro:IdiomTM premium content copy protection technology to enable LodgeNet-served
hotels to display HD premium satellite and video-on-demand entertainment licensed by satellite
programmers and movie studios. While the rate of HD conversions has been reduced recently, as
hotels have deferred their purchase of high-definition televisions and we have reduced the amount
of capital allocated to installation activities, we expect the number of rooms served with our HD
system will expand significantly during the next several years, as all of our new installations and
system upgrades (associated with a long-term contract extension) will include HD capabilities.
The Guest Entertainment revenues generated from our interactive television services are dependent
upon a number of factors, including:
Ø | the number of rooms equipped with our interactive television system; | ||
Ø | the range of interactive and HD television content and services offered at each hotel; | ||
Ø | the popularity, amount and timeliness of content offered, as well as the popularity and availability of other entertainment alternatives; | ||
Ø | the profile of the guest at each property; | ||
Ø | the price of the service purchased by the hotel guest; | ||
Ø | the occupancy rate at the property; and | ||
Ø | general economic conditions and consumer sentiment. |
4
Table of Contents
Our ability to increase the number of rooms served by our interactive television system is
dependent on a number of factors, including the amount of capital we elect to allocate to
installation activities, the desirability of our technology, new hotel construction, and the number
of hotels which choose to purchase a system from us. Revenues vary with the number, availability
and popularity of major motion pictures and the guests other entertainment alternatives. The
price charged for each interactive programming option is established by us and is segmented
according to the guest mix profile at each property and overall economic conditions. Movie prices
are set on a title-by-title basis and may be higher in some locations and for more popular titles.
In addition, our content management systems allow us to refresh interactive menus, promote
different products and different titles to different demographics, and change pricing of our
products, selection and promotions based on time-of-day or day-of-week, among other marketing
efforts to the guest. Our systems allow us to measure guests entertainment selections and we
adjust our programming and the pricing of the programming to respond to viewing patterns.
Occupancy rates vary by property based on the propertys competitive position within its
marketplace, seasonality factors, and as a result of changes in general economic conditions.
Typically, occupancy rates are higher during the second and third quarters due to seasonal travel
patterns, and these quarters typically generate our strongest financial results.
Hotel Contracts. We provide our interactive television services under contracts with lodging
properties which generally are for a term of five to seven years. Our contracts typically require
that we will be the exclusive provider of in-room, on-demand television entertainment services to
the hotels, permit us to set prices for the interactive services, and allow us to terminate the
contract and remove our system if the results of operations do not meet our return on investment
criteria. Under these contracts, we generally install our interactive television network in the
hotel and retain ownership of all equipment utilized in providing our services (except for the
television sets and other in-room equipment, which are paid for by the hotels). The length of each
agreement is determined based on a number of factors, including the revenue potential of the hotel,
the amount of capital we are investing in the equipment, and other considerations. A term of five
to seven years is generally adequate to assure we receive the expected return on our invested
capital and to the extent this is not the case, we generally require the hotel to contribute a
portion of the capital required. In cases where the hotel customer contributes to the capital
costs of the system, the term and other provisions of the agreement may be modified from those set
forth above; however, the terms will be designed to meet our return on investment criteria. The
terms contained in the contracts with corporate-managed hotels are generally negotiated by that
hotels corporate management in a master agreement, and the hotels subscribe at the direction of
corporate management. In the case of franchised hotels, the contracts are generally negotiated
separately with each hotel. A master agreement typically gives us status as a preferred provider
to owned or franchised properties for a defined period of time, which can range from one to seven
years. While the exclusivity period of the master agreements may vary, any property level
agreements executed pursuant to a master agreement are determined in a manner similar to individual
properties, with terms of five to seven years, where we make the capital investment in the system.
When a property level agreement is for a period of less than five years, the individual property
generally must contribute most, if not all, of the required capital. We also offer, to certain
hotel customers who would not otherwise qualify for the installation of our systems using our
capital or who desire to exercise greater control over content and pricing, the opportunity to
purchase our systems combined with long-term service maintenance and content agreements with us.
For the on-demand programming which is purchased by the hotel guest, the hotel collects such
charges on our behalf, along with the collection of room and other charges made by the hotel guest,
and the hotel remits funds to us on a monthly basis. The hotel retains a commission for such
services, which varies depending on the size and profitability of the system and other factors. We
generally seek to extend and renew hotel contracts in advance of their expiration on substantially
similar or more advantageous terms. Over the last five years, we have de-installed an average of
approximately 3% of our installed base per year. During 2009, we de-installed approximately
102,000 rooms, or approximately 5% of our installed base. De-installations typically reflect
certain sites electing not to continue to provide on-demand programming to their guests or our
decision not to renew contracts at select properties, primarily limited service and extended stay
properties, as the revenue generated at these properties frequently does not meet our payback
criteria. We believe this is a sound business decision, as we intend to deploy our capital for
renewals and for new rooms where we believe we can generate the highest return on our investment.
Internationally, we intend to continue to expand in selected countries in Asia, South America,
Europe and other regions through the sale of our equipment and long-term licensing agreements or
other arrangements with entities in those areas which do not require capital investment by us.
5
Table of Contents
Hotel Services, System Sales and Other Diversified Revenue
One of our principal business goals is to diversify our sources of revenue by the following
products and services:
Television Programming. We also offer a wide variety of satellite-delivered television programming
paid for by the hotel and provided to guests at no charge. The television programming is delivered
via satellite through DIRECTV ®, pursuant to an agreement, and distributed to guest rooms over the
internal hotel network, and typically includes premium channels such as HBO and Showtime, which
broadcast major motion pictures and specialty programming, as well as non-premium channels, such as
CNN and ESPN. With the launch of the high-definition configuration of our interactive television
system, we also began offering high-definition television programming to the extent available from
broadcast sources and DIRECTV.
The television programming is generally provided under contracts with hotel properties which
generally run for the same period as the interactive television contract for a given property. The
hotel pays a fixed fee per room per month for this programming, which in turn is provided to the
guest without charge. We categorize this recurring revenue as Hotel Services revenue. We also
generate revenue through the sales of the system equipment necessary to provide this service to the
hotels. This revenue is categorized as revenue from System Sales and Related Services.
Broadband Internet Access System Sales, Service and Support. We also design, install and operate
wired and wireless broadband Internet access systems at hotel properties. These systems control
access to the Internet, allow hotels to charge or provide the access as a guest amenity and provide
bandwidth management tools. We generate revenue through the sale and installation of the equipment
and we provide ongoing maintenance, service and call center support services to hotel properties
installed by us and also to hotel properties installed by other providers. While this is a highly
competitive area, we believe we have important advantages as a result of our existing hotel
customer relationships, our expertise in integrating and customizing connectivity solutions for
hospitality, our nationwide field service network and a 24-hour call center to support calls from
hotel customers.
Contracts for broadband Internet access services to hotels generally have terms of three to four
years. Pursuant to these agreements, the hotel pays us a fixed fee per room per month for
providing 24-hour help desk services to their guests having questions about accessing the Internet.
In some cases, we also enter into technical service agreements, for which the hotel pays an
incremental fixed fee per room per month. We also provide technical service under an hourly
service charge arrangement. We categorize the recurring monthly revenue as Hotel Services revenue
and the revenue from equipment sales as revenue from System Sales and Related Services.
System Sales and Other Services. In addition to the sale of Internet connectivity systems and
satellite television reception equipment to our hotel customers, we also generate revenue from the
sale of interactive television systems to our international licensees. We also offer hotel
properties that do not meet our economic and/or demographic profile, or wish to accelerate the
installation of their system, the opportunity to purchase our interactive television system. We
then program, operate and maintain the system and receive a percentage of revenue generated from
Guest Entertainment purchases. We categorize the revenue generated from these sales as System
Sales and Related Services. Our Professional Solutions Group provides services to hotels such as
system planning, technical installations, project management and support services, primarily
focused on high-definition television and low voltage wiring installations, as well as managed
Internet connectivity services for conferences and meetings in hotels. Generally, the Professional
Solutions Group quotes and sells its services on a project-by-project basis.
Operations and Structure
Sales and Marketing. For the hospitality market, we focus our sales and marketing strategies on
acquiring new contracts from hotels, extending and retaining existing contracts, and marketing our
interactive services to hotel guests. Our sales and marketing organization includes national
account representatives, who develop relationships with national hotel franchise organizations and
management groups, and regional sales representatives, who maintain relationships primarily with
regional hotel management and ownership organizations. We market our services and products to
hotels by advertising in industry trade publications, attending industry trade shows and direct
marketing. Sales activities are coordinated from our headquarters. Given our long operating
history and reputation for service and innovation, we believe we are well recognized in the market
among our existing and potential customers.
6
Table of Contents
We market our services to hotel guests through a variety of means, including an interactive,
image-based menu and purchasing protocol using on-screen graphics, promotions and programming
information. Our system also generates a Welcome Channel, which appears on-screen when the
television is turned on and describes the programming and interactive services available through
our system. Our systems also generally have a promotion channel located within the television
lineup which presents movie trailers and other information about the services available on the
system.
Installation Operations. Once a contract has been signed with a hotel, our installation personnel
prepare engineering surveys for each site, install our systems, train the site staff to operate the
systems and perform quality control tests. Due to our geographically diversified customer base, we
have determined it is usually more cost effective to utilize subcontracted installation teams,
which are managed and coordinated by our in-house installation employees. We work closely with our
company-trained subcontractors and have a separate quality control department to regularly monitor
quality standards.
Service Operations. We believe high quality and consistent systems support and maintenance are
essential to our continued competitive success. We emphasize the use of company-employed service
personnel operating from locations throughout the United States, Canada and Mexico, but also use
company-trained subcontractors in areas where there is not a sufficient concentration of
company-served hotels to warrant a company-employed service representative. Service personnel are
responsible for all preventive and corrective systems maintenance. Our service organization is
also utilized to support our broadband Internet systems.
We maintain a toll-free customer support hot line, which is staffed 24 hours a day, 365 days a
year. The on-line diagnostic capability of our systems enables us to identify and resolve most of
reported system service issues from our service control center without visiting the hotel. When a
service visit is required, the modular design of our systems permits service personnel to replace
only those components which are defective at the site.
Component Suppliers. We contract directly with various electronics firms for the manufacturing and
assembly of certain system hardware, the design of which is controlled by us. We have found these
suppliers to be dependable and generally able to meet delivery schedules on time. We believe, in
the event of a termination of any of our sources, with proper notification from the supplier,
alternate suppliers could be located without incurring significant costs or delays. Certain
electronic component parts used within our products are available from a limited number of
suppliers and can be subject to temporary shortages because of general economic conditions and the
demand and supply for such component parts. If we were to experience a shortage of any given
electronic part, we believe alternative parts could be obtained or system design changes
implemented. In such event, we could experience a temporary reduction in the rate of new
installations or tape-to-digital conversions and/or an increase in the cost of such installations.
All other components of our systems are standard commercial products, such as computers, hard
drives, routers, modulators and amplifiers, which are available from multiple sources. We believe
our anticipated growth can be accommodated through existing suppliers.
7
Table of Contents
Programming. We obtain non-exclusive rights to show recently released major motion pictures from
motion picture studios pursuant to an agreement with each studio, which is typically two to three
years in length. The royalty rate for each movie is pre-determined, with the studio receiving a
percentage of the gross revenue from the movie. For recently released motion pictures, we
typically obtain rights to exhibit the picture while it is still in theatrical release but prior to
its release to the home video market or for exhibition on cable television. For our television
on-demand programming, we obtain the rights to exhibit television on-demand content for which we
pay a predetermined percentage of gross revenue or a one-time fixed fee. In addition, we
distribute satellite delivered cable television programming, including HD format programming,
through agreements with DIRECTV, with certain agreements having two year extension periods. We
also have agreements with certain other select television programming providers. We pay our
television programming providers a fixed, monthly fee for each room or subscriber receiving the
service. We believe our relationships with the television programming suppliers are good and
expect to renew these contracts as necessary on competitive terms. We obtain independent films,
most of which are non-rated and intended for mature audiences, for a one-time fixed fee. We also
obtain non-exclusive rights to digital music content, through an agreement with a recently acquired
subsidiary, whereby we pay a predetermined percentage of the gross revenue from the music service.
We obtain our selection of Nintendo ® video games pursuant to a non-exclusive license agreement
with Nintendo, which expires in May 2013. Under the terms of the agreement, we pay a monthly fee
equal to a percent of revenue generated from the sale of Nintendo video game services. For our
Hotel SportsNETSM programming, we obtained the rights to exhibit sporting event content
from the NFL, NHL, NBA, ESPN and College Sports TV (CSTV), for which we pay a predetermined
percentage of gross revenue.
Technology, Product Development, and Patents. We design and develop our own interactive
television systems. Because such systems utilize an open architecture design incorporating industry
standard interfaces, historically we have been able to upgrade system software to support the
introduction of new services or integrate new technologies as they become economically viable. Our
interactive television system incorporates commercially manufactured, off-the-shelf electronic and
computer components and hardware.
Our system architecture utilizes a proprietary, two-way digital communications design to process
and respond in real time to input commands from guests through the television in each guest room.
This capability, combined with our menus and guest interface screens, enables us to provide guests
with sophisticated interactive television services which include: on-demand movies with pause,
skip, forward, back and save functionality; network-based video games; music services; on-demand
television programming and a variety of other interactive services. Our system also interfaces
with the hotel systems, allowing guests to review room charges, check out, take guest surveys and
view interactive information about the hotel and its services.
Our interactive television systems consist of equipment located within the guest room and
associated equipment required for the generation, reception, storage, transmission, amplification
and modulation of signals located elsewhere in the hotel. Typical in-room equipment includes a
terminal unit and a hand-held television remote control. For those properties equipped with the
digital systems, in-room equipment may also include an infrared computer keyboard or a video game
controller. Video and music programming originates from the system headend and is transmitted to
individual rooms over the hotels coax-based (RF) or Internet Protocol (IP) Local Area Network.
Video game programs are downloaded into dedicated video game processors also located within the
headend. Keystrokes and other system commands and communications are transmitted from the room
using our proprietary communications infrastructure and the video and other signals are transmitted
to the guest room over the network. The system computer controls the delivery of the interactive
services to the guest room and also records purchase transactions and billing data to the hotels
accounting system, which posts the charge to the guests bill.
8
Table of Contents
In addition, we are continuing to develop and integrate technologies which enable us to deliver
high-definition television and other digital content to our hotels and their guests. These
developments extend our digital platform with new technology, including specially-equipped digital
televisions and set-top or set-back boxes which are able to receive RF signals or IP video data and
decrypt and decode this digital content and render menus in the guestroom. These HD systems are
contrasted with our traditional systems, which deliver an analog signal to the room from either a
digital storage device or analog tape-based storage. The digital content is encrypted to protect
the rights of content owners, who consider this protection when granting us distribution rights.
We have recently launched an IP-based solution which provides in-room interactivity and support for
properties with IP networks. Our IP solution leverages our current headend-based platform and our
industry-leading content management and distribution technology, providing scalability, reliability
and lower costs than many other models.
Our content management systems allow us to refresh interactive menus, by brand or even down to a
specific property level, if desired, promote different products and titles to different
demographics and change pricing of our products, selection and promotions based on time-of-day or
day-of-week, among other marketing efforts to the guest.
In support of our strategy of expanding networks and integrating solutions, we continue to innovate
and develop new technology solutions we believe will be relevant to our hospitality customers. To
that end, we are currently working on a new platform development program which will provide for a
broader selection of web-based services in the hotel guest room. This new platform will be
available in different configurations so we can both provide support for our currently deployed
digital platform as well as provide expanded features and capabilities for new installs and
upgrades.
At those properties where we have sold broadband Internet systems, we offer a selection of
technology systems which consist of commercial off-the-shelf networking equipment used to provide
wired and wireless connections to guests computers. To support these systems, we have our own
proprietary Visitor Based Network (VBN) software, which manages connections between the guest and
the Internet, and also offer solutions which use licensed VBN software. The connection to the
Internet is provided by either the hotel or an Internet Service Provider contracted by us.
Our policy is to apply for patents on those product designs which management believes may be of
significance to our business. We currently hold 26 United States and foreign patents, and have
other applications for patents pending, which pertain to various aspects of our interactive
systems. We also license industry-related technology from third parties.
ADVERTISING AND MEDIA SERVICES
The Hotel Networks (THN) business provides a platform to create and generate revenue for our
Company through paid advertising or sponsorships. THNs primary business is presenting advertisers
with the opportunity to target attractive demographic groups, such as business professionals,
affluent consumers and travelers. These mobile professionals represent a coveted demographic to
many marketers, and THN provides a set of programs to reach this audience. In 2009, THN had
advertisers from industries such as insurance, pharmaceutical, automotive, travel, financial
services, technology, consumer goods and telecommunications.
THN provides traditional television advertising, place-based digital advertising and promotional
marketing solutions focused on business-class and upscale hotels. We believe by approaching guests
with relevant messaging when they are in the comfort of a hotel room, free of distractions,
advertisers have a prime opportunity to capture the attention of and connect with these desired
consumers. This is accomplished through three primary program offerings:
1) | Traditional Television Advertising. The THN Superblock consists of a package of 10 cable networks broadcast through THNs private satellite network. Based on the agreement THN has with most of these networks, THN has 100% of the national and local commercials available across these networks, which is then sold to advertisers in a block format. |
9
Table of Contents
2) | Video-On-Demand/Interactive Advertising. THN offers two approaches to interactive advertising. Freeviews is an on-demand advertising program which enables guests to choose from a variety of advertiser-sponsored content within the interactive television menu, which they can view free of charge. Interactive Channels is a program which allows marketers to promote their products or brands on an interactive, linear channel located within the standard free television lineup, from which guests can then telescope into content stored on the interactive television server. Freeviews and Interactive Channel content categories include target areas such as golf, travel, technology, health, fitness, and music. These programs are also Nielsen rated, so we can demonstrate to advertisers their ad impressions are being delivered. | ||
3) | Programming Carriage Services. Network, cable and content companies value the branding and sampling hotel broadcast distribution provides to a large and important demographic. Both satellite and server channels can provide programming trial, which research shows leads to a significant viewership conversion when guests return home. |
Sales and Marketing. We focus our sales and marketing activities on selling advertising time and
sponsorship opportunities to consumer brands and their representative advertising agencies. Our
sales organization calls on clients and the full array of agencies, from promotional, out-of-home
(OOH) and interactive agencies to broadcast planners and buyers. Additionally, we market our
company and services through trade publications, various web sites and industry conferences.
Installation and Service Operations. We utilize both internal installation personnel and
subcontractors to install contracted equipment and services to hotels. We also utilize the
Hospitality field service operations and customer support services to provide high quality and
consistent system support and maintenance for the systems deployed in the hotels. The satellite
uplink and distribution of our networks is provided via contract with third party providers, with
ad insertion and trafficking provided by an in-house team based in New York City.
Programming. Additionally, we market customized content and programming to hotels in both a linear
channel and on-demand format. This includes packages of traditional cable programming, as well as
proprietary content we source or produce ourselves. In some cases, we are able collect
distribution fees from content partners due to the marketing exposure generated through our hotel
networks.
Technology and Product Development. We leverage the technology and product development of the other
LodgeNet divisions, as well as develop innovative, advertising-specific applications. THN also has
dedicated resources for promotional development, interactive programming and new media.
HEALTHCARE
In the healthcare industry, we sell a variety of solutions to acute care and specialty hospitals,
including the LodgeNetRX Interactive Patient Television System, patient education solutions,
clinical systems integration applications, cable television hardware and programming and
professional technical and installation services. We generate revenue from the sale of the system
hardware, software license and installation services. Additionally, we earn recurring revenues
from the sale of on-demand and television entertainment content, patient education content,
software maintenance and technical support services. The healthcare interactive television system
is based on our Hospitality system architecture, but has been customized for use in a healthcare
environment. In addition to entertainment offerings, these systems can be used for patient
education, to facilitate communications with hospital staff, for staff training and for interface
with hospital nutritional systems.
In the healthcare market, the healthcare facilities purchase the hardware system and implementation
services from us, and pay us an annual software license fee. We also charge annual fees for
services, support, content acquisition and encoding. Contract terms are typically for five years
and many sites implement services in phases, which provide future growth opportunities for us.
Systems are sold through both direct sales and sales agents who have relationships established with
healthcare facilities.
As of December 31, 2009, we had 45 facilities installed with our interactive television system.
10
Table of Contents
Healthcare Market and Customers
The healthcare market in the United States consists of approximately 900,000 hospital beds across
5,900 facilities. We believe most hospitals currently do not have any form of interactive
television services. Customers who have purchased interactive television systems from us represent
some of the most highly regarded hospitals and health systems in the United States, and include
facilities such as Brigham and Womens Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts; The University of Texas
MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas; Childrens Pittsburgh, part of UPMC Health System;
Baylor Plano/Baylor Heart in Texas; Kaiser Oakland/Sunnyside in California; and The University of
Chicago Northshore Hospital, among others. The main interests in interactive television services
include driving patient satisfaction, providing robust patient education with comprehensive
reporting and operation efficiencies and cost savings for automating processes such as integrated
food ordering.
Interactive television systems are most commonly purchased at the time of new hospital
construction, in conjunction with a renovation project or at the time the facility migrates to
flat-panel televisions. We believe hospitals are seeking to leverage their facility investments to
provide greater patient satisfaction and enhanced patient experiences.
Healthcare Market Services and Products
LodgeNet Healthcare offers care facilities a variety of solutions, including the following:
Ø | LodgeNetRX Interactive Patient Television system, including specialized applications and services; | ||
Ø | professional services including cable plant design, modification and installation, as well as television installation services; | ||
Ø | DIRECTV satellite equipment sales and programming; | ||
Ø | digital signage and messaging solutions; and | ||
Ø | service agreements covering cable plant, DIRECTV, television and interactive system support. |
A significant focus for hospitals and healthcare systems is the availability of on-demand patient
education, due to government requirements for enhancing patient comprehension of education
materials. Since the majority of hospitals are using printed content to educate patients, we
believe there is an opportunity for considerable improvement in this area by using an interactive
system which delivers on-demand video content. To address this concern, LodgeNet created an
integrated assigned education solution. With this solution, video content can be assigned for a
specific patient based on their diagnosis. The education solution also provides optional
interactive questions in order to measure comprehension. Lastly, the results of the viewing and
patient answers to the comprehension questions can be sent to the care facilitys electronic
medical record system.
11
Table of Contents
Additional applications delivered by our interactive television system include:
Ø | a custom welcome channel; | ||
Ø | safety videos; | ||
Ø | a hospital information channel; | ||
Ø | a relaxation channel; | ||
Ø | music channels; | ||
Ø | interactive games; | ||
Ø | interactive information about the hospital and its services; | ||
Ø | patient request application allows patients to submit common requests through the television, which are sent directly to the appropriate party, freeing the nursing staff to better focus on patient care; | ||
Ø | patient feedback surveys designed to capture and build in-service recovery so patient issues can be identified and addressed by the care staff while the patient is still in the hospital; | ||
Ø | other revenue-generating services promotion such as outpatient pharmacy, home medical equipment, health clubs, and other outreach/continuum of care services; and | ||
Ø | meal ordering application provides information on the diet types, and allows patients to order meals which are offered based on diagnosis and allergies. |
Sales and Marketing. For the healthcare market, we focus our sales and marketing activities on the
acquisition of new care facility contracts and on building market awareness of our LodgeNetRX
solution. Our sales organization consists of internal direct sales and third-party healthcare
sales/lead referral agents with care facility relationships. We market our solution and service
through industry trade publications, a healthcare web site (www.lodgenetrx.com), healthcare trade
shows and healthcare summits targeting facilities vice presidents and chief nursing officers
(CNOs).
Installation and Service Operations. We utilize both internal installation personnel and
subcontractors to install contracted equipment and services to individual healthcare facilities.
To manage the cost and quality of our installations, we assemble the systems at our corporate
headquarters and utilize the same group of subcontractors who install our Hospitality interactive
systems. We also utilize the Hospitality field service operations and customer support services to
provide high quality and consistent system support and maintenance for the systems deployed in
healthcare facilities.
Programming. We sell programming to healthcare facilities using various third-party distributors.
We obtain the rights to show major motion pictures, which are typically offered to patients at no
charge, as well as patient education content, pursuant to non-exclusive programming agreements.
These agreements are typically three to five years in length, with programming royalties based on
the number of beds at each healthcare facility receiving services. In addition, we also utilize
our existing relationships with DIRECTV for television programming and Nintendo for video game
services.
Technology and Product Development. We generally leverage the technology and product development
utilized in the hospitality market to provide solutions and services to healthcare facilities with
limited modifications and customizations.
12
Table of Contents
Competition
Hospitality
Based on the number of hotels and rooms served, we are the worlds largest provider of interactive
media and connectivity solutions to hotels. Competitors for media and connectivity services
include, but are not limited to:
Ø | other interactive television service providers such as Hospitality Networks, Inc. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cox Communications, Inc.), NXTV, Kool Connect, Guest-Tek, iBAHN, Roomlinx and international providers, such as Acentic, MagiNet and Quadriga; | ||
Ø | other providers of basic and premium television programming, such as Charter Communications, Comcast, Cox Cable, Dish Network, DIRECTV, Time Warner, BulkTV and World Cinema; | ||
Ø | television networks and programmers such as ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, HBO, and Showtime; | ||
Ø | other broadband Internet service providers, such as iBAHN, Guest-Tek, EthoStream, SuperClick, Comcast, Time Warner, Verizon, AT&T Wi-Fi Venue Services and T-Mobile; and | ||
Ø | companies which offer in-room computers with Internet access or other types of Internet access systems. |
Other indirect competition for guest attention and revenue include: television programming;
portable media devices such as MP3 players, iPods® and DVD players; other devices such as laptop
computers and cell phones; websites which offer on-demand videos and movies; and other forms of
entertainment and information such as newspapers, magazines and books, concerts, sporting events
and movie theaters. Given the high level of innovation in communications technology, we expect to
continue to confront new sources of competition.
A number of potential competitors, including those identified above, could use their existing
infrastructure to provide in-room entertainment services to the lodging industry. Some of these
potential competitors are already providing guest entertainment, television programming or
Internet-related services to the lodging industry. Some of these companies have substantially
greater financial and other resources than we do, and it is possible such competitors may develop a
technology which is more cost effective than ours. To respond to competition, we will need to
continue to enhance our interactive systems, expand our operations and meet the increasing demands
for competitive pricing, service quality and availability of value-added product offerings.
Competition with respect to hotel contracts centers on a variety of factors, depending upon the
features important to a particular hotel. Among the more important factors are:
Ø | the features and benefits of the service offering, and Internet or interactive system; | ||
Ø | the quality of the vendors technical support and maintenance services; | ||
Ø | the financial terms and conditions of the proposed contract, including commissions to the hotel or capital cost of the system; and | ||
Ø | the ability to complete system installation in a timely and efficient manner. |
In addition, with respect to hotel properties already receiving in-room entertainment or high-speed
Internet services, the incumbent provider may have certain informational and installation cost
advantages as compared to outside competitors. We believe our competitive advantages include:
Ø | the size of our existing customer base; | ||
Ø | our history of innovation; | ||
Ø | our diverse client base; | ||
Ø | our technically-innovative digital platform; | ||
Ø | our high definition platform; | ||
Ø | our flexible interactive television system; | ||
Ø | our content management system; and | ||
Ø | our field service group, which is, we believe, the largest technical services group focused on the hospitality industry. |
13
Table of Contents
We believe our past success in securing contracts reflects the strong competitive position of our
products and services. While we believe our system architecture is comparable or superior to the
systems currently being used by our competitors in the hospitality industry, our competitors may
develop cost effective systems comparable or superior to ours. Also, we may not be able to
continue our current level of success in obtaining new contracts from hotels currently served by
other providers or previously un-served, and we may not be able to retain contracts with hotels we
serve when our contracts expire.
In the basic and premium television programming market, the local franchised cable operator in a
hotels market may have a substantial market presence. Such operators generally offer the hotel
owner only standard packages of programming, typically developed for the residential market rather
than the lodging market, and at a fixed price per room based on all the channels provided. We
compete with the franchised cable operator for basic and premium programming contracts by
customizing packages of programming to provide only those channels desired by the hotel, typically
reducing the overall cost per room to the hotel operator.
Competitive pressures in the interactive television, basic and premium television programming and
broadband Internet access segments could result in reduced market share for us, higher hotel
commissions, lower margins and increased expenditures for marketing, product development and
systems installation, each of which could adversely affect our financial condition and operating
results.
Advertising and Media Services
The Hotel Networks occupies a unique niche in the advertising industry, providing commercial
branding and promotional programs targeted towards hotel guests based on our hotel relationships
and distribution network. This consumer group, which contains many affluent and business
travelers, represent an important, and at times, elusive, target for many companies and brands.
Advertisers do have other options when considering how to best reach and engage with these
potential consumers. Although there are but a few known in-hotel competitors which offer
programs such as sampling and public space digital advertising, there are many others which target
travelers and the business community in other ways. This includes:
Ø | Airport Advertising: Place-based OOH media found in airports, represented by companies such as Viacom, CBS Outdoor and JC Decaux; | ||
Ø | Airline Advertising: Television programming supported with commercials during flight, tray-top ads and ad-supported in-flight magazines and airline sampling programs, represented by companies such as IdeaCast and Brand Connections; and | ||
Ø | Office Advertising: Place-based digital media in office buildings, office elevators, etc., represented by companies such as Wall Street Journal, Captivate Media and others. |
More generally, we compete against the full array of media and marketing services companies. This
includes television broadcasters and cable companies such as FOX, CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, and ESPN. It
also includes magazine and web publishers, especially those focused on travelers, affluent and
business markets. These broader media companies offer superior reach but are generally not as
targeted as The Hotel Networks advertising programs.
We believe our competitive advantages include:
Ø | significant experience in the hotel space with well established hotel relationships; | ||
Ø | ability to leverage the LodgeNet field support and technical infrastructure; | ||
Ø | broad array of advertising options including hotel television media, VOD media and in-room promotion; | ||
Ø | hotel television media which is Nielsen monitored, rated and guaranteed for advertisers; | ||
Ø | ideal environmental factors for ad receptivity no DVRs, few distractions, comfortable setting; | ||
Ø | consumer engagement which is both long and of a high quality; | ||
Ø | ability to integrate our marketing programs combining media with promotion; | ||
Ø | sophisticated technology allowing telescoping, where consumers can click from a linear commercial to an interactive ad menu; and | ||
Ø | large size of our existing customer base. |
14
Table of Contents
Healthcare
Main competitors in the healthcare market include, but are not limited to:
Ø | other interactive patient care providers such as GetWell Network, Skylight, and Allen Technologies; | ||
Ø | companies which primarily sell or lease television sets and also offer some interactive services, which include TVRC and TeleHealth; and | ||
Ø | other providers of basic and premium television programming, such as Charter Communications, Comcast, Cox Cable, Dish Network, DIRECTV and Time Warner. |
We believe our competitive advantages include:
Ø | our significant experience from thirty years of service in the lodging sector; | ||
Ø | the technical reliability of our solution; | ||
Ø | our nationwide service and support organization; | ||
Ø | our ability to leverage features from our lodging systems to efficiently customize and deploy new solutions to healthcare facilities; | ||
Ø | our ability to provide our services over existing cable infrastructure; and | ||
Ø | our access to HD content with Pro:IdiomTM encryption technology. |
Business Strategy
During 2010, our business goal is to continue to proactively manage our business through the
evolving economic environment, with strategies which will drive long-term shareholder value and
maintain full compliance with the covenants of our Credit Facility. In furtherance of this goal,
we are focusing on (a) reinvigorating our interactive television through new high-definition
television (HDTV) offerings and innovative content, promotions and interactive applications; (b)
driving the continued growth of our diversified revenue initiatives from the sale of additional
services and systems to hotels, healthcare facilities and international licensees; (c) exploring
additional diversification opportunities; and (d) managing our level of capital investment activity
to our targeted level of free cash flow performance.
To mitigate the Guest Entertainment revenue decline within the Hospitality market, we believe
long-term opportunity exists to grow our revenue by increasing the number of rooms installed with
our HD interactive television system and by selling more high-definition satellite programming and
broadband Internet systems, equipment and professional services to our hotel customers. We offer a
wide variety of commercial systems and equipment hotels need as they upgrade their television
systems to the new high-definition technology and internal broadband Internet networks to
contemporary standards. We also offer hotel properties which do not meet our economic and/or
demographic profile the opportunity to purchase our interactive television system. We program,
operate and maintain the system and receive a percentage of revenue generated from Guest
Entertainment purchases. We also sell hotels a variety of connectivity, satellite television
receiving and video equipment. In addition, we offer consultation, technical installation, project
management and support services, primarily focused on high-definition television and low voltage
wiring installations, as well as managed Internet connectivity services for conferences and
meetings in hotels.
We believe there are long-term growth opportunities available to us to expand the revenue we
generate from advertising and media services. We deliver advertising-supported media into select
hotel segments from which we earn revenue from the sale of television commercials or other
marketing based programs. We believe the demographic and professional profile of the traveler
within our room base tends to have characteristics attractive to consumer marketing organizations.
Within the Healthcare market, we offer our professional services and interactive television systems
to healthcare facilities in the United States, primarily for patient education and entertainment.
In this market, we sell our services and interactive system and license our software, and earn
recurring revenues from the provision of hardware and software service and maintenance activities
and the sale of entertainment content. We believe opportunity exists to
continue to expand our
business within this underserved market by securing contracts from new customers and expanding the
scope of our services with our existing customers.
15
Table of Contents
Regulation
Hospitality
Cable Television Regulation. The Communications Act of 1934, as amended by the Cable
Communications Policy Act of 1984, the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of
1992, and the Telecommunications Act of 1996, (collectively, the Communications Act) governs the
regulation of cable systems. The law defines a cable system as a facility, consisting of a set
of closed transmission paths and associated signal generation, reception and control equipment,
which is designed to provide cable service, including video programming, and which is provided to
multiple subscribers within a community, but the law exempts from that definition, among other
facilities, a facility which serves subscribers without using any public rights-of-way. We
construct and operate separate headend systems at each hotel and those systems do not use public
rights-of-way. Consequently, we are not required to comply with many of the Federal Communication
Commissions (FCC) rules relating to cable systems, including, among other things, rate
regulation and the requirement to obtain a franchise from local government authorities in order to
provide video services.
The FCC rules define a multi-channel video programming distributor as a person such as, but not
limited to, a cable operator, a multi-channel multipoint distribution service, a direct broadcast
satellite service, or a television receive-only satellite program distributor, who make available
for purchase, multiple channels of video programming. We may be considered to be a multi-channel
multipoint distribution service. As such, we may be subject to various provisions of the
Communications Act. The Communications Act includes laws and regulations which would benefit our
operations, such as provisions which ensure our access to programming on fair, reasonable and
nondiscriminatory terms, as well as provisions which may subject us to additional requirements,
such as the requirement to obtain consent from broadcasters in order to retransmit their signal
over our systems.
Broadband Internet Access. The FCC has classified high-speed Internet access as an interstate
information service as defined by the Communications Act. To date, the FCC has not imposed any
regulations on information service providers, although it may do so in the future.
The foregoing does not purport to describe all present and proposed federal, state and local
regulations and legislation relating to our business. Other existing federal, state and local laws
and regulations currently are, or may be, the subject of a variety of judicial proceedings,
legislative hearings and administrative and legislative proposals which could change in varying
degrees the manner in which private cable operators, other video programming distributors and
Internet service providers operate. We cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings or their
impact upon our operations at this time.
Healthcare
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) addresses the security and
privacy of health data. The privacy and security rules promulgated under HIPAA apply only to
covered entities health plans, healthcare clearinghouses and healthcare providers. If
LodgeNet enters into a contract with a healthcare facility which makes it a business associate, or
a company which performs functions or activities involving the use or disclosure of protected
health information on behalf of a covered entity, LodgeNet must comply with the terms and
conditions of such contract, which will require LodgeNet to appropriately safeguard the
confidentiality, integrity and availability of the protected health information it receives or
transmits on behalf of the covered entity.
Employees
As of December 31, 2009, we had 1,091 employees in the United States, Canada and Mexico. We have
not experienced any significant labor problems and believe our relationships with our employees are
good.
16
Table of Contents
Corporate Information and Web Site Access to SEC Filings
We are a Delaware corporation with our principal executive offices located at 3900 West Innovation
Street, Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57107. Our telephone number is (605) 988-1000.
Our web site address is http://www.lodgenet.com. We make our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly
Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, including all amendments to those reports,
available free of charge on our web site as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is
electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
17
Table of Contents
Item 1A Risk Factors
We experienced net losses in 2009, 2008 and 2007. If we are not profitable in the long-term or do
not generate sustained levels of free cash flow, a non-GAAP measure which we define as cash
provided by operating activities less cash used for investing activities, it could have a harmful
effect on our results of operations, business and the value of our common stock. We generated net
losses of $10.2 million, $48.4 million and $65.2 million for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our financial results for the fiscal year 2010 will be
dependent to a significant degree on general economic conditions and the execution of our business
plan.
We have substantial debt and significant interest payment requirements. As of December 31, 2009,
we had $469.9 million of consolidated debt. Subject to restrictions in our Credit Facility and
instruments governing our current and future debt securities, we may also incur additional amounts
of debt for working capital, capital expenditures and other purposes. Our level of debt could have
significant consequences on our business, including the following:
Ø | we may have difficulty utilizing our credit revolver to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or for other purposes; | ||
Ø | we will need to use a large portion of our cash flow to repay higher levels of interest on borrowings, which will reduce the amount of cash flow available to fund operations, capital expenditures and other activities; | ||
Ø | some of our debt has a variable rate of interest, which exposes us to the risk of increased interest rates; | ||
Ø | we are more vulnerable to economic downturns and adverse development in our business; and | ||
Ø | we may not have the flexibility to respond to changing business and economic conditions, including increased competition and demand for new products and services. |
Covenant restrictions under our current Credit Facility may limit our ability to operate our
business. Our current Credit Facility contains covenants which may restrict our ability to finance
future operations or capital needs or to engage in other business activities. Future borrowing
instruments, such as credit facilities and indentures, if any, are also likely to contain
restrictive covenants and may require us to pledge assets as security under those future
arrangements. The terms of our current Credit Facility, including financial covenants, restrict,
among other things, our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to:
Ø | borrow money; | ||
Ø | pay dividends; | ||
Ø | purchase or redeem stock; | ||
Ø | repay subordinated indebtedness before its stated maturity date; | ||
Ø | make investments in third parties and extend credit outside the normal course of business; | ||
Ø | engage in transactions with affiliates; | ||
Ø | engage in sale-leaseback transactions; | ||
Ø | consummate certain asset sales; | ||
Ø | effect a consolidation or merger, or sell, transfer, lease or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets; and | ||
Ø | create liens on our assets. |
Events beyond our control, including changes in general economic and business conditions, as well
as our financial performance, may adversely affect our business. In addition, the Credit Facility
contains certain financial ratio and financial condition covenants. Such changes in general
economic and business conditions, or our financial performance, may affect our ability to meet
those financial ratios and financial conditions tests and to otherwise remain in compliance with
the requirements of our Credit Facility and other material agreements. A breach of any of these
covenants would result in a default under the applicable debt instrument or agreement. In that
event, the amounts under the applicable agreement could be declared immediately due and payable, or
require us to amend the Credit Facility resulting in significantly higher annual interest expense
and such a default may cause a default under some of our material agreements. As a result of these
covenants and restrictions, we are limited in how to conduct our business and we may be unable to
compete effectively, to meet our customer demands for installations or service or take advantage of
new business opportunities.
18
Table of Contents
In order to continue operating efficiently and expand our business, we must remain in compliance
with covenants outlined in our Credit Facility. Our ability to remain in compliance with those
covenants will depend on our ability to generate sufficient Adjusted Operating Cash Flow (a term
defined in our Credit Facility) and cash from operations, to manage our level of capital investment
and to continue to reduce our debt. We continue taking actions within our control to reduce our
debt and remain in compliance with our debt covenants. The actions within our control include our
prudent management of capital investment and operating costs and exploring other alternatives,
which may include seeking an amendment to our Credit Facility, raising additional capital, wage
reductions, reduced service hours or other reductions to the workforce. We believe we are
balancing the interest of our customers and our Company by reducing our capital investments,
reducing our operating cost structure and aggressively reducing the level of debt. We are
committed to reducing our debt and are taking actions to remain in compliance with our debt
covenants. Though we expect to comply with all debt covenants during 2010, our ability to comply
with these covenants depends on achieving our planned operating results and making further debt
reductions. Given the continuing softness in the economy and the uncertainties impacting travel
and lodging, in addition to the constraints in the credit markets, consumer conservatism and other
market dynamics, we cannot assure we will be able to meet our planned results and required
covenants. If we are not able to remain in compliance with the debt covenants, it will likely have
a significant, unfavorable impact on our business and financial condition and we may need to amend
the Credit Facility to seek a waiver of the covenants. An amendment to the Credit Facility may
significantly increase our interest costs, add upfront fees or modify other terms less favorable to
us than we currently have in our Credit Facility. In the event our lenders will not amend or waive
the covenants, the debt would be due and we would need to seek alternative financing. We cannot
provide assurance we would be able to obtain alternative financing. If we were not able to secure
alternative financing, this would have a substantial adverse impact on the Company.
Diversification activities may not be successful and may divert management attention from our
traditional business. We have sought to diversify our business and decrease reliance on revenue
from Guest Entertainment revenue. These activities have included sales of systems to healthcare
facilities and the sale of advertising within the Hospitality market and may include additional
markets in the future which we consider to be complementary to our other businesses. In addition,
we are also working to create new diversified revenue streams within the hospitality market.
However, the diversification into areas in which we do not have the same experience as our
traditional business involves a variety of risks, such as diversion of limited resources and
personnel from our traditional business as well as managements time and attention. In addition,
we may not be able to market these new businesses successfully, for any number of reasons.
Accordingly, we may not be successful in growing these new revenue streams.
Our revenue is affected by seasonality and dependent on other factors beyond our control, including
current negative economic climate and reduced business travel. Generally, our revenue is dependent
on the timely availability of content, including popular major motion pictures, the occupancy rate
of each hotel property served, the percentage of occupied rooms buying movies or other services at
the property and the price of the services. Occupancy rates vary based on the propertys location,
its competitive position within the marketplace, seasonal factors, economic conditions, the level
of business travel, changes in travel patterns due to public health concerns, the threat of
terrorism, wars and other international crises and other factors outside of our control. Occupancy
rates are usually higher during the summer and lower during winter. The percentage of occupied
rooms buying movies or other services at the property generally reflects the hotels guest mix
profile, the popularity and seasonality of movies, the availability of HD content, other services
available at the hotel and the guests other entertainment alternatives. The percentage of
occupied rooms buying movies and other services at the property also varies over time with general
economic conditions. Over the past year, and due to the negative economic conditions and reduced
business travel, our revenue has been negatively impacted by substantially lower hotel occupancy
rates and by materially lower purchases by consumers. Because many factors described above are out
of our control, we may not be able to control negative trends in our revenue.
Our revenue per room could be affected if hotel brands modify brand standards or decide to
eliminate certain services we provide. The size of our room base, our revenue, profitability and
free cash flow could be negatively impacted if Guest Entertainment or other services we provide are
no longer designated as brand standard by hotel franchising companies or if certain of our
products, such as independent films, most of which are non-rated and intended for mature audiences,
are not part of the product package contracted with hotels.
19
Table of Contents
We may not have adequate capital resources to support our business, which could have a harmful
effect on our business and prospects. We may have insufficient capital resources to support our
business if our cash from operations decreases or our capital expenditure or working capital
requirements increase, whether as a result of product development efforts, changes in technology or
otherwise, and we are unable to access financing on acceptable terms. This would have the
following adverse impacts on our business and prospects, among others:
Ø | we may modify our business plan and adjust or delay capital spending necessary to expand or maintain our customer base or to continue to deploy our digital systems and other technological advances throughout our installed room base; | ||
Ø | we may lose a substantial number of customers if we delay or limit our capital investments; | ||
Ø | we may have insufficient capital to make payments on our outstanding indebtedness as they become due; | ||
Ø | we may have to delay or limit our product development activities; and | ||
Ø | we may be required to seek additional capital through additional equity or debt financings, asset sales, collaborative arrangements or other sources, which may not be available to us on a timely basis, if at all, or may not be available on acceptable terms. |
Opportunities to expand our installed customer room base may be limited, so we may be unable to
grow our revenue. While new hotel construction and hotel expansions offer an opportunity to expand
our customer base, increases in un-served rooms due to the addition of new hotel rooms in any given
year are generally not substantial and are impacted by general economic conditions. Additionally,
we may be limited by certain financial constraints or choose not to make capital or other
expenditures, which would adversely affect growth if our cash management strategy calls for us to
conserve available resources. Even if we are willing to make such expenditures, we may not be
successful in our efforts to further expand our installed customer room base. These circumstances
may limit our ability to expand our installed room base, which in turn could limit our ability to
grow revenue.
We operate in a very competitive business environment and competition could reduce our revenue and
our cash flow. Our business is primarily reliant on the hotel in-room entertainment business,
which is highly competitive. If we are unable to compete effectively with large diversified
entertainment service providers and large technology service providers who have substantially
greater resources than we have, our operating margins and market share could be reduced and the
growth of our business inhibited. In particular, we compete directly for customers with a variety
of other interactive service providers, including other interactive television service providers,
cable television companies, direct broadcast satellite companies, television networks and
programmers, Internet service providers and portals, technology consulting and service firms,
companies offering web sites which provide on-demand movies, rental companies providing DVDs which
can be viewed in properly equipped hotel rooms or on other portable viewing devices, and hotels
which offer in-room laptops with Internet access or other types of Internet access systems. We
also compete, in varying degrees, with other leisure-time activities such as movie theaters, the
Internet, radio, print media, personal computers and other alternative sources of entertainment and
information. In addition, future technological developments may affect competition within this
business. A continuing trend toward business combinations and alliances in both the domestic and
foreign entertainment service industries may create significant new competitors for us. Many of
these combined entities could have resources greater than ours. These combined entities may
provide bundled packages of programming, delivery and other services which compete directly with
the products we offer. Our competitors may also offer services sooner and at more competitive
rates than we do. We may need to reduce our prices or license additional programming to remain
competitive, and we may be unable to sustain future price levels as competition increases. Our
failure to achieve or sustain market acceptance of our offered services at desired pricing levels
could impair our ability to generate free cash flow, which could harm our business.
Our business could be adversely impacted by conditions affecting the lodging industrys
performance. Our results are closely connected to the performance of the lodging industry, where
occupancy rates may fluctuate resulting from various factors. Reduction in hotel occupancy
resulting from business, economic or other events, such as generally weak economic conditions,
significant international crises, acts of terrorism, war or public health issues, could adversely
impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. The overall travel industry
can be, has been in the past and currently is, adversely affected by weaker general economic
climates, geopolitical instability and concerns about public health.
20
Table of Contents
New technologies, including the expansion of digital distribution of content in our markets, may
increase competition and result in a decrease in our revenue. Our success can depend on new
product development. The entertainment and communications industry is ever-changing as new
technologies are introduced. Advances in technology, such as new video formats, downloading or
alternative methods of product delivery and distribution channels such as the Internet or certain
changes in consumer behavior driven by these or other technologies and methods of delivery, could
have a negative effect on our business. While we mitigate risks by continually designing,
engineering and developing products and systems which can be upgraded to support new services or
integrated with new technologies as they become economically viable, there can be no assurance we
will continue to be successful in these efforts. The deployment of high-definition television
(HDTV) and the introduction of new technologies such as Internet Protocol television (IPTV) into
the hospitality market could accelerate the convergence of broadcast, telecommunications, Internet
and other media and could result in material changes in the economics, regulations, intellectual
property usage and technical platforms on which our business relies. Video-on-demand has been
introduced over the Internet, as high-speed broadband access has greatly increased the speed and
quality of viewing content, including feature-length movies, on personal computers or
Internet-connected television. These changes could lower cost barriers for our competitors
desiring to enter into, or expand their presence in, the television-based interactive services
business. Increased competition may adversely affect the scale, source and volatility of our
revenue streams, cost structures and cash flow, and may require us to significantly change our
operations. There is a risk our business and prospects will be harmed by these changes or we will
not identify or adapt to them as quickly as our competitors. In addition, we may experience
difficulties and delays in developing new products and systems or in integrating our system with
new technologies. We may have to incur significant capital expenditures in order to adapt to
technological changes. If other technologies become affordable and viable alternative methods of
content delivery which are widely supported by studios and adopted by consumers emerge, our
business could be adversely affected.
If we fail to develop new products, services and product enhancements, our business and prospects
could be harmed. We have a continuing product development program designed to develop new products
and services and to enhance and improve existing products and services. The successful development
of products, services and product enhancements is subject to numerous risks, both known and
unknown, including:
Ø | unanticipated delays; | ||
Ø | access to capital; | ||
Ø | budget overruns; and | ||
Ø | technical problems. |
These difficulties could result in the abandonment or substantial change in the design, development
and commercialization of these new products or product enhancements.
Given the uncertainties inherent with product development and introduction, we cannot assure any
given product development efforts will be successful on a timely basis, within budget or at all.
Our failure to develop new products, services and product enhancements on a timely basis or within
budget could harm our business and prospects. In addition, there is no assurance any new product,
service or product enhancement will be attractive to hotels and/or the hotel guests.
We may have to incur significant capital expenditures in order to adapt to technological change.
The television-based interactive service industry has been, and is likely to continue to be,
subject to:
Ø | rapid and significant technological change, including continuing developments in technology which do not presently have widely accepted standards; and | ||
Ø | frequent introductions of new services and alternative technologies, including new technologies for providing high-definition television and providing Internet content. |
21
Table of Contents
New technologies may emerge which may be superior to, or may not be compatible with, some of our
current technologies, which may require us to make significant capital expenditures to remain
competitive. In particular, we will have to incur capital expenditures for high-definition
television platforms in our hotel properties. Many of our competitors, including cable and
Internet service providers, may have greater financial and technical resources to adapt to and
capitalize on any such technological changes more effectively than we can. Our future success will
depend, in part, on our ability to anticipate and adapt to technological changes and to offer, on a
timely basis, services which meet customer demands and evolving industry standards. In part, we
rely on third parties for the development of, and access to, communications and network technology.
As a result, we may be unable to obtain access to new technology on a timely basis or on
satisfactory terms. If we fail to adapt successfully to any technological change or obsolescence,
or fail to obtain access to important technologies, our revenues and business could be harmed.
Our business could be harmed if we are unable to protect our proprietary technology. We rely
primarily on a combination of trade secrets, patents, copyright and trademark laws and
confidentiality procedures to protect our technology. Despite these precautions, unauthorized
third parties may infringe, copy, or reverse engineer portions of our technology. We do not know
if current or future patent applications will be issued within the scope of claims sought, if at
all, or whether any patent issued will be challenged or invalidated. In addition, we have applied,
or plan to apply for, corresponding patents and patent applications in several foreign countries
for some of our existing patents and patent applications. There is a risk these patent
applications will not provide significant protection for our products and technology. Our
competitors may independently develop similar technology our patents do not cover. In addition,
because patent applications in the United States can provide patent protection from the date of
filing but are not publicly disclosed until approximately 18 months after the patent application
has been filed, other patent applications may have been filed in those previous 18 months which
relate to our technology and of which we are unaware. Moreover, there is a risk foreign
intellectual property laws will not protect our intellectual rights to the same extent as United
States intellectual property laws. In the absence of significant patent protection, we may be
vulnerable to competitors who attempt to copy our products, processes or technology, which could
harm our business.
If our products or services employ technology which infringes the proprietary rights of others, we
may be subject to infringement claims, forced to pay certain fees to license technology or be
required to stop selling our products. We are currently subject to a number of lawsuits alleging
we have infringed a third partys patent rights. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements Legal Proceedings. Our business could be harmed if we infringe upon the intellectual
property rights of others. We have been notified in the past, and may be in the future, that we
may be infringing intellectual property rights possessed by third parties. If any such claims are
asserted, we may seek to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. There is a risk in these
situations no license will be available or a license will not be available on reasonable terms,
precluding our use of the applicable technology. Alternatively, we may decide to litigate such
claims or to design around the patented technology. These actions could be costly and would divert
the efforts and attention of our management and technical personnel. A successful claim of
infringement against us or our failure or inability to license infringed or similar technology
could damage our business to the extent we are required to pay substantial monetary damages or if,
as a result of a successful claim, we are unable to sell our products or services without
redeveloping them or are otherwise forced to incur significant additional expense. As a result,
any infringement claims by third parties or claims for indemnification by customers resulting from
infringement claims, whether or not proven to be true, may harm our business and prospects.
We are dependent on others for our programming content and increases in our costs or license fees
to obtain such programming could reduce our cash flow and profitability. Our guest room
programming content is provided primarily by movie studios, major television networks and other
providers, aggregators and distributors of entertainment content. We currently pay each of these
parties a fee for the right to distribute their programming in our installed guest rooms. In the
future, we may be exposed to volatile or increased programming costs which may adversely affect our
operating results. Our entertainment content providers may demand higher royalty rates or higher
minimum payments than we are currently paying or may defer making their content available to us.
We do not have a formal agreement with some of our content providers and, therefore, content from
these providers may not be available in the future on terms which are acceptable to us, or at all.
Increased licensing fees would also negatively impact our operating results.
22
Table of Contents
Our revenue may be adversely affected by a reduction or elimination of the time between our receipt
of movies and the movies being made available to the home market. We receive our movies directly
from movie studios and the timing is at the studios discretion. Historically, we have received
movies prior to their being more broadly distributed via movie rental or retail stores. The
window of release has yielded a competitive advantage, as hotel guests have been able to view
movies in the hotel rooms prior to being able to rent or purchase them for home viewing. Recently,
this advance window of release has been reduced and a further reduction or elimination of this
advance window of release could adversely affect our revenue. In addition, if a studio delays
release of a movie to us in a manner inconsistent with past practices, we may not be able to
generate as much revenue from such movie as we could have with an earlier release date.
The lack of quality programming or a change in available content could reduce our profitability and
cash flows. Our profitability and cash flow is dependent on our ability to provide quality and
popular programming to our hotel guests. We currently provide hotel guests major movies we obtain
from movie studios. The quality and popularity of major movies available at any given time and
from year to year can vary widely. Generally, the more popular titles at the box office will also
be more popular with hotel guests. We also provide hotel guests independent films, most of which
are non-rated and intended for mature audiences, music services and Nintendo video games. Our
ability to be profitable and generate positive cash flow depends upon our ability to provide
content for which hotel guests are willing to pay. However, we cannot predict the future
popularity or quality of the movies, music, games or other content we provide or may provide in the
future. If, for any reason, such content became less popular than it is currently, or is not made
available to us for distribution on a timely basis, our business could be adversely impacted. In
addition, if any significant portion of the content we provide to hotel guests were to become
unavailable, for reasons which could include licensing difficulties, governmental regulation or
issues of public standards, our business could be adversely impacted. In addition, any negative
publicity, lawsuit or boycotts by opponents of the mature-themed programming content could have a
negative impact on the willingness of the lodging industry to offer such content to guests, which
in turn, could have a detrimental effect on our revenues and ability to achieve stated business
goals.
Federal, state, local and foreign legislation and regulation may negatively impact our business and
growth. We may be classified as a multi-channel video programming distributor, and thus may be
subject to various provisions of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended by the Cable
Communications Policy Act of 1984, the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of
1992 and the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and the regulations promulgated under those acts. In
addition, the Internet-based services offered by us may be affected by various laws and
governmental regulations. While there are currently few laws or regulations directly applicable to
access to or commerce on commercial online services, new laws and regulations are under debate by
federal and local lawmakers and may be adopted. The adoption of such laws or regulations in the
future may slow the growth of commercial online services and the Internet, which may cause a
decline for our Internet-based services and products or have other adverse effects on our business.
In addition, any legislative or regulatory changes restricting content which may be delivered over
our systems, particularly mature content, could significantly reduce our revenue and operating
income. Federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations are, or may be, the subject of a
variety of judicial, administrative and legislative hearings and proceedings which could change, in
varying degrees, the regulatory classification applicable to us and the manner in which we are
regulated. We cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings or the impact on our operations at
this time.
If our hotel customers become dissatisfied with our service, they may elect not to renew or to
terminate service agreements with us and, in that event, our ability to maintain or grow our
revenue would be adversely affected. In the event our customers become dissatisfied with the scope
or capability of our products or services, or the level of funding we are willing or able to
allocate to hotel-based investments, they may elect not to renew our service agreements upon
expiration or, in certain instances, terminate their existing agreements with us for failure to
perform under the terms of their existing contracts. The loss of a hotel chain customer, any group
of customers, or the loss of a significant number of hotels could have a detrimental effect on our
operations and financial condition. However, we believe our interactive hotel base is well
diversified in terms of (i) location; (ii) demographics; and (iii) customer contracts. We rely on
our diverse hotel base and geographic diversity to mitigate these exposures, as well as the fact
our services are provided under long-term contracts. Nevertheless, our success depends on
maintaining good relationships with the clients and property owners we serve.
23
Table of Contents
Our data systems could fail or their security could be compromised. Our business operations depend
on the reliability of sophisticated data systems. Any failure of these systems, or any breach of
our systems security measures, could adversely affect our operations, at least until our data can
be restored and/or the breaches remediated.
The price of our common stock may be subject to volatility. As of December 31, 2009, a substantial
portion of our common stock was held by a limited number of institutional investors, and the amount
of capital stock held by non-institutional holders is believed to be limited. This concentration
of ownership may limit the amount of stock available for sale or purchase at any particular time,
and may result in significant increases or decreases in the price of our common stock due to
factors which may not reflect the market as a whole or our economic condition or results of
operations.
Item 1B Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2 Properties
Our headquarters, including our distribution center and principal executive offices, are located in
Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Our owned facility is used for executive, administrative and support
functions; assembly and distribution; and warehouse space. We believe our facility will be
sufficient to accommodate foreseeable local operational space requirements.
We lease 31 facilities, in various locations, from unaffiliated third parties. These facilities
include offices for our subsidiaries and combination warehouse/office facilities for our
installation and service operations, and are located throughout the United States, Canada and
Mexico.
Item 3 Legal Proceedings
We are subject to litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. As of the date hereof, we
believe the resolution of such litigation will not have a material adverse effect upon our
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
On July 11, 2008, LinkSmart Wireless Technology, LLC, a California limited liability company based
in Pasadena, California, filed several actions for patent infringement in the U.S. District Court
in Marshall, Texas. The suits allege the Company and numerous other defendants infringe a patent
issued on August 17, 2004, entitled User Specific Automatic Data Redirection System. All pending
cases have been consolidated. The complaint does not specify an amount in controversy. The
Company believes it does not infringe the patent in question, has filed responsive pleadings and is
vigorously defending the action. The defendants in the case have also entered into a joint defense
agreement to allow them to share information and certain costs related to the lawsuit. The suit is
in the initial discovery stage. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has undertaken a
re-examination of the patent which is the subject of this suit, and issued a preliminary finding
that the patent is invalid.
24
Table of Contents
On November 17, 2009, Nomadix, Inc., a Delaware corporation based in Newbury Park, California,
filed an action for patent infringement in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of
California in Los Angeles, California. The suit alleges the Company and its subsidiaries On
Command Corporation and LodgeNet StayOnline, Inc. infringe five patents: a patent issued October
10, 2000, entitled Nomadic Translator or Router, a patent issued on August 6, 2006 entitled
System and Method for Establishing Network Connection with Unknown User or Device, a patent
issued on June 30, 2009 entitled System and Method for Establishing Network Connection with
Unknown Network and/or User Device, a patent issued on October 21, 2003 entitled Systems and
Methods for Redirecting Users Having Transparent Computer Access to a Network Using a Gateway
Device Having Redirection Capability, and a patent issued on March 15, 2005 entitled Systems and
Methods for Integrating a Network Gateway Device with Management Systems. The complaint also
asserts claims under the above-mentioned patents and additional patents against a number of other
defendants, including Hewlett-Packard Company, Wayport, Inc., Ibahn Corporation, Guest-Tek
Interactive Entertainment Ltd. and Guest-Tek Entertainment Inc., Aruba Networks, Inc., Superclick,
Inc. and Superclick Networks, Inc. Nomadix, Inc. also filed a similar action in the same court
against SolutionInc. It is anticipated all pending cases will be consolidated. The complaint does
not specify an amount in controversy. The Company believes it does not infringe the patents in
question, has filed responsive pleadings and is vigorously defending the action.
25
Table of Contents
PART II
Item 5 Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
Our common stock currently trades on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (NASDAQ Exchange) under the
symbol LNET. Our common stock began trading on the NASDAQ Exchange on October 14, 1993 upon the
effectiveness of our initial public offering. As of March 8, 2010, there were outstanding
22,541,164 shares of common stock.
The following table sets forth, for the fiscal quarters indicated, the range of high and low sales
prices of our common stock as reported by NASDAQ:
Quarter Ended | High | Low | Quarter Ended | High | Low | |||||||||||||
March 31, 2009
|
1.73 | 0.50 | March 31, 2008 | 17.64 | 5.92 | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2009
|
5.99 | 1.50 | June 30, 2008 | 7.46 | 4.81 | |||||||||||||
September 30, 2009
|
7.75 | 3.11 | September 30, 2008 | 4.92 | 1.98 | |||||||||||||
December 31, 2009
|
7.77 | 4.26 | December 31, 2008 | 2.45 | 0.48 |
On March 8, 2010, the closing price of our common stock, as reported by NASDAQ Exchange, was $6.60.
Stockholders are urged to obtain current market quotations for our common stock. As of March 8,
2010, we have 109 stockholders of record with approximately 98.7% of the shares held in street
name. We estimate that as of March 8, 2010, we had more than 3,712 beneficial owners of our
common stock.
We have 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized at $0.01 par value per share, of which
57,500 10% Series B cumulative perpetual convertible shares were issued and outstanding as of
December 31, 2009, with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
During 2009, we did not repurchase any shares of our common stock.
Dividends
No dividends have been paid to date on our common stock. The terms and conditions of our bank
Credit Facility contain covenants, which restrict and limit payments or distributions in respect of
our common stock.
Subject to the declaration of dividends by our Board of Directors, cumulative dividends on the
preferred stock will be paid at a rate of 10% per annum of the $1,000 liquidation preference per
share, starting from the date of original issue, June 29, 2009. Dividends accumulate quarterly in
arrears on each January 15, April 15, July 15 and October 15, beginning on October 15, 2009.
However, payments must come from funds legally available for dividend payments. Dividends were
declared on the preferred stock by our Board of Directors. On October 14, 2009, we paid $1.7
million of dividends, and as of December 31, 2009, we had $1.4 million of unpaid dividends. These
dividends were paid on January 14, 2010. The dividends were recorded as a reduction to our
additional paid-in capital, due to our accumulated deficit balance.
Stockholder Rights Plan
In February 2008, we adopted a stockholder rights plan (the 2008 Rights Plan), which was approved
by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting on May 14, 2008. The rights plan is intended to maximize
stockholder value by providing flexibility to the Board of Directors in the event an offer for
LodgeNet is received which is either inadequate or not in the best interest of all stockholders.
26
Table of Contents
The following is a summary of the material terms of the 2008 Rights Plan. The statements below are
only a summary, and we refer you to the full text of the 2008 Rights Plan, which was filed as an
exhibit to Form 8-A filed with the SEC on March 3, 2008. Each statement in this summary is
qualified in its entirety by this reference.
General
Under the terms of the 2008 Rights Plan, each share of common stock outstanding has one Right
attached to it, so the purchase of a share of common stock is also a purchase of the attached
Right. Certificates representing the Companys common stock also represent the attached Rights.
The Rights are not currently exercisable or separately tradable.
After the Distribution Date, which is described below, each Right will become separately tradable
and initially will entitle the holder to purchase from the Company one one-thousandth of a share of
Series A Participating Preferred Stock (the Preferred Shares) at a price of $60.00 (the Purchase
Price), subject to adjustment. Each one one-thousandth of a Preferred Share has rights roughly
equivalent to one share of common stock. If certain circumstances occur as discussed below, the
Rights would instead entitle their holders to purchase common stock of the Company or an acquirer.
Assuming the Plan is approved by the stockholders every three years, the Rights will expire at the
close of business on February 28, 2017 (the Final Expiration Date).
Events Causing Exercisability and Separate Transferability
A Distribution Date will occur and the Rights will become exercisable and separately tradable
upon the earlier of:
(1) | the first public announcement a person or group (other than the Company, any subsidiary, or a benefit plan of the Company or its subsidiaries), has acquired, or obtained the right to acquire, except under limited circumstances, beneficial ownership of 20 percent or more of the outstanding common stock; or | ||
(2) | the close of business on the tenth business day (or such later date as the Companys Board of Directors may determine) after the commencement of, or a public announcement of, an intention to commence (which tender offer is not terminated within such ten business days), a tender or exchange offer the consummation of which would result in a person or group becoming an Acquiring Person (as defined in the following). |
Generally, a person or group whose acquisition of common stock causes a Distribution Date pursuant
to clause (1) above (including pursuant to the completion of a tender or exchange offer described
in (2)) is an Acquiring Person. As soon as practicable following the Distribution Date, separate
Right certificates will be mailed to holders of record of the common stock as of the close of
business on the Distribution Date.
Events Causing Adjustment of the Shares Acquirable Upon Exercise of the Purchase Price
Generally, if any person becomes an Acquiring Person, each holder of a Right, other than the
Acquiring Person (and any affiliates and certain transferees), will then have the right to receive,
upon exercise and payment to the Company of the Purchase Price, instead of one-one thousandth of a
Preferred Share, the number of shares of Company common stock having an average market value equal
to two times the Purchase Price. Any Rights beneficially owned by any Acquiring Person (or any
affiliate or certain transferees) will be null and void. In other words, the Rights holders, other
than the Acquiring Person and certain others, may at that time purchase Company common stock at a
50 percent discount.
27
Table of Contents
Alternatively, in the event that, after the first public announcement, a person or group has become
an Acquiring Person, the Company is a party to a merger, statutory share exchange or sale of more
than 50 percent of the Companys assets or earning power in a transaction with an Acquiring Person
or certain specified related parties or in which all holders of Company common stock are not
treated alike, then each holder of a Right (except Rights which have been voided as set forth
previously) shall have the right to receive, upon exercise and payment to the Company of the
Purchase Price, instead of one-one thousandth of a Preferred Share, common shares of the acquiring
or surviving company having an average market value equal to two times the Purchase Price. In
other words, the Rights holders, other than the Acquiring Person and certain others, may at that
time purchase the acquiring or surviving companys common shares at a 50 percent discount.
The Purchase Price payable and the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the Rights are
subject to adjustment, from time to time, to prevent dilution upon the occurrence of specified
events affecting the Preferred Shares. The number of outstanding Rights and the Purchase Price are
also subject to adjustment in the event of a stock dividend on the common stock payable in common
stock or subdivisions or combinations of the common stock occurring before the Distribution Date.
Redemption of the Rights
At any time before a person becomes an Acquiring Person, the Board may redeem the Rights in whole,
but not in part, at a price of $.01 per Right (the Redemption Price), payable in cash or common
stock. The Board may also redeem the Rights for a limited time after 60 days after the later of
the date a person or group becomes an Acquiring Person and the effective date of a registration
statement under the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to securities issuable upon exercise of the
Rights.
In addition, if the Company receives a Qualified Offer (as defined in the following paragraph),
the Rights may be redeemed by the stockholders if approved by the holders of at least a majority of
the outstanding common stock at a special meeting of stockholders called to vote on a resolution
accepting the Qualified Offer and to authorize the redemption of the Rights pursuant to the
provisions of the Agreement. The special meeting must be held within 90 business days after the
Company receives a request from stockholders to hold such a meeting. If a resolution to redeem the
Rights is approved at the special meeting (or if the special meeting is not held on or before the
90th business day after receipt of the request for a meeting), it will become effective
immediately prior to the consummation of any Qualified Offer consummated within 60 days after the
earlier of the special meeting or the 90th business day after receipt of a request for a
special meeting of shareholders.
A Qualified Offer is a tender offer for all outstanding common stock not already beneficially
owned by the person making the offer which meets all of the following conditions:
Ø | the same per share price is offered for all shares, and such price per share is greater than the highest closing price for the common stock during the 12 month period immediately preceding the date on which the offer is commenced, represents a reasonable premium above the average of the closing prices for the five trading days immediately preceding the date on which the offer is commenced, is at least 80 percent cash (with any non-cash consideration consisting of common stock of the offeror), and is to be paid upon consummation of the offer; | ||
Ø | if the consideration offered includes shares of common stock of the offeror, the offeror is a publicly owned United States corporation and its common stock is traded on either the New York Stock Exchange or The NASDAQ Stock Market (NASDAQ), no further stockholder approval is required to issue such common stock, no other class of voting stock of the offeror is outstanding, and the offeror shall permit the Companys investment banking firm and legal counsel to have access to such offerors books, records, management, accountants and other advisers for the purpose of permitting such investment banking firm and such legal counsel to conduct a due diligence review to permit such investment banking firm to be able to render a fairness opinion with respect to the consideration being offered; the offer is accompanied by written financing commitments and/or the offeror has on hand cash or cash equivalents, for the full amount of all financing necessary to consummate the offer and follow-on merger; |
28
Table of Contents
Ø | the offer is subject to a non-waivable condition that a minimum of 90 percent of the outstanding common stock (other than those owned by the offeror) will be tendered and not withdrawn as of the offers expiration date; | ||
Ø | the offer by its terms remains open for at least 60 business days and at least 10 business days after the date of any special meeting of shareholders called under the redemption provisions, plus 15 business days after any change in price or after any bona fide alternative offer for a higher consideration is made; | ||
Ø | the offer is accompanied by a written opinion of a nationally recognized investment banking firm stating the price to be paid to holders pursuant to the offer is fair and including any written presentation of such firm showing the analysis and range of values underlying such conclusion; | ||
Ø | on or before the date the offer is commenced, such person makes an irrevocable written commitment to the Company (1) to acquire, within five business days following completion of the offer, all shares of common stock not beneficially owned by such person at the same cash price per share as paid in the offer, (2) not to amend its offer to reduce the price or otherwise change the terms in a way which is adverse to tendering shareholders, and (3) if the offer is not consummated, such person will not make another offer for the common stock within one year if at least 85 percent of the common stock not owned by such person has not been tendered; and | ||
Ø | the offer is subject only to the conditions specified in the definition and usual and customary terms and conditions, and is not subject to any financing, funding or similar condition, nor to any condition relating to completion of or satisfaction with any due diligence or similar investigation. |
Amendments
The 2008 Rights Plan may be amended by the Board before the Distribution Date without the consent
of the Rights holders. After the Distribution Date, the Rights Plan may be amended by the Board to
cure any ambiguity, to correct or supplement any provision which may be defective or inconsistent
with any other provision, to make changes which do not adversely affect the interests of holders of
Rights (excluding the interests of any Acquiring Person), or, subject to certain limitations, to
shorten or lengthen any time period under the Rights Plan (other than a time period governing
redemption at a time when the Rights are not redeemable).
29
Table of Contents
Item 6 | - Selected Financial Data |
The following is a summary of the Statement of Operations and other data derived from the audited
financial statements. The data should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial
Statements, the notes thereto, and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations, all included elsewhere herein. Dollar amounts are in thousands, except
share data and per room amounts:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Select Financial Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Hospitality |
$ | 469,743 | $ | 519,922 | $ | 474,473 | $ | 285,770 | $ | 275,568 | ||||||||||
Other |
14,749 | 13,957 | 11,115 | 2,443 | 203 | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
484,492 | 533,879 | 485,588 | 288,213 | 275,771 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
21,692 | (5,071 | ) | (4,236 | ) | 26,932 | 22,693 | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
(10,155 | ) | (48,418 | ) | (65,172 | ) | 1,841 | (6,959 | ) | |||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(3,114 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders |
$ | (13,269 | ) | $ | (48,418 | ) | $ | (65,172 | ) | $ | 1,841 | $ | (6,959 | ) | ||||||
Net (loss) income per common share (basic and diluted) |
$ | (0.59 | ) | $ | (2.16 | ) | $ | (3.00 | ) | $ | 0.10 | $ | (0.39 | ) | ||||||
Other Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures (1) |
$ | 21,341 | $ | 64,407 | $ | 79,097 | $ | 48,268 | $ | 51,855 | ||||||||||
Average cost per room new installation |
$ | 345 | $ | 389 | $ | 399 | $ | 354 | $ | 340 | ||||||||||
Guest Entertainment revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Movie revenue |
$ | 277,670 | $ | 338,683 | $ | 327,353 | $ | 208,166 | $ | 201,996 | ||||||||||
Other interactive service revenue |
18,147 | 26,273 | 27,668 | 18,030 | 19,053 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 295,817 | $ | 364,956 | $ | 355,021 | $ | 226,196 | $ | 221,049 | ||||||||||
Average monthly revenue per Guest Entertainment room: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Movie revenue |
$ | 12.66 | $ | 15.20 | $ | 16.62 | $ | 17.27 | $ | 17.00 | ||||||||||
Other interactive service revenue |
0.83 | 1.18 | 1.42 | 1.50 | 1.60 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 13.49 | $ | 16.38 | $ | 18.04 | $ | 18.77 | $ | 18.60 | ||||||||||
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 17,011 | $ | 10,800 | $ | 25,569 | $ | 22,795 | $ | 20,742 | ||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 508,354 | $ | 589,786 | $ | 693,823 | $ | 263,209 | $ | 263,072 | ||||||||||
Total debt |
$ | 469,946 | $ | 588,520 | $ | 624,594 | $ | 270,169 | $ | 292,000 | ||||||||||
Total stockholders deficiency |
$ | (70,987 | ) | $ | (128,748 | ) | $ | (48,242 | ) | $ | (58,122 | ) | $ | (70,233 | ) |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Statement of Cash Flows Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 86,172 | $ | 89,853 | $ | 58,869 | $ | 72,301 | $ | 64,285 | ||||||||||
Property and equipment additions |
(21,341 | ) | (64,407 | ) | (79,097 | ) | (48,268 | ) | (51,855 | ) | ||||||||||
64,831 | 25,446 | (20,228 | ) | 24,033 | 12,430 | |||||||||||||||
Cash (used for) provided by acquisition and other activities, net |
| | (354,177 | ) | (2,336 | ) | 400 | |||||||||||||
$ | 64,831 | $ | 25,446 | $ | (374,405 | ) | $ | 21,697 | $ | 12,830 | ||||||||||
(1) | Presented as cash used for property and equipment additions as reported in the Statement of Cash Flows. |
30
Table of Contents
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this report or document incorporated herein by reference constitute
forward-looking statements. When used in this report, the words intends, expects,
anticipates, estimates, believes, goal, no assurance and similar expressions, and
statements which are made in the future tense or refer to future events or developments, including,
without limitation, those related to covenant compliance and impairment of goodwill, are intended
to identify such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks,
uncertainties, and other factors that could cause the actual results, performance or achievements
to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. In addition to the risks and uncertainties discussed in
Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, in any prospectus
supplement or any report or document incorporated herein by reference, such factors include, among
others, the following:
Ø | the effects of economic conditions, including general financial conditions (including those represented recently by liquidity crises, government bailouts and assistance plans, bank failures and recessionary threats and developments); | ||
Ø | the economic condition of the lodging industry, which can be particularly affected by the financial conditions referenced above, as well as by high gas prices, levels of unemployment, consumer confidence, acts or threats of terrorism and public health issues; | ||
Ø | decreases in hotel occupancy, whether related to economic conditions or other causes; | ||
Ø | competition from providers of similar services and from alternative sources; | ||
Ø | changes in demand for our products and services, programming costs, availability, timeliness, and quality; | ||
Ø | technological developments by competitors; | ||
Ø | developmental costs, difficulties, and delays; | ||
Ø | relationships with clients and property owners; | ||
Ø | the availability of capital to finance growth; | ||
Ø | the impact of covenants contained in our credit agreement, compliance with which could adversely affect capital available for other business purposes, and the violation of which would constitute an event of defaults; | ||
Ø | the impact of government regulations; | ||
Ø | potential effects of litigation; | ||
Ø | risks of expansion into new markets; | ||
Ø | risks related to the security of our data systems; and | ||
Ø | other factors detailed, from time to time, in our filings with the SEC. |
31
Table of Contents
Item 7 | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements,
including the notes thereto, appearing elsewhere herein.
Executive Overview
Despite the challenging economic conditions affecting the travel and lodging industry, during 2009
we proactively managed our business and operations, which resulted in improvements to our bottom
line and free cash flow performance. We define free cash flow, a non-GAAP measure, as cash
provided by operating activities less cash used for certain investing activities, including
growth-related capital, and consideration paid for acquisitions. Our diversified revenue
initiatives, which focus on non-Guest Entertainment revenue, increased $19.8 million or 11.7%, year
over year. Our system operations and selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses were
$87.1 million in 2009, a decrease of 20.7% or $22.8 million over 2008, and helped offset 65.8% of
total gross profit decline in 2009. Our income from operations increased $26.8 million, from an
operating loss of $(5.1) million in 2008 to an operating income of $21.7 million in 2009.
Additionally, we proactively reduced our capital investment activity in 2009 by 66.9%, down to
$21.3 million compared to $64.4 million in 2008, increasing our free cash flow by 154.8% during
2009 to $64.8 million.
These operational results, along with proceeds from our preferred stock offering, allowed us to
reduce our long-term debt by $118.6 million during 2009 and to be in compliance with the terms of
our Credit Facility. We plan to continue to utilize a majority of our free cash flow for further
debt reduction, and expect to remain in compliance with our Credit Facility during 2010. We remain
focused on improving our profitability and maximizing cash flow through ongoing operations.
As a result of the economic conditions, record low occupancy levels of the hotel industry and the
demand for our products and services during 2009, our total revenue was $484.5 million, a decrease
of $49.4 million or 9.3%, compared to 2008. The decrease in revenue was attributed to a decrease
in Guest Entertainment revenue, partially offset by increases in revenue from Hotel Services,
System Sales and Related Services and Healthcare.
Hospitality revenue, which includes Guest Entertainment, Hotel Services and System Sales and
Related Services, decreased $50.2 million or 9.7%, to $469.7 million for 2009 compared to $519.9
million for 2008. Due to softness in the travel economy, hotel occupancy declined 8.8% during 2009
compared to last year. The average monthly Hospitality revenue per room was $21.42 for 2009, a
decrease of 8.2% as compared to $23.33 for 2008.
Guest Entertainment revenue, which includes on-demand entertainment such as movies, games, music
and other interactive services delivered through the television, decreased $69.2 million or 18.9%,
to $295.8 million. On a per-room basis, monthly Guest Entertainment revenue for 2009 declined
17.6%, to $13.49 compared to $16.38 in 2008. Average monthly movie revenue per room was $12.66 for
2009, a 16.7% reduction as compared to $15.20 per room in the prior year. These decreases were the
result of the decline in occupancy and a cautious consumer buying pattern. Partially offsetting
the decline in Guest Entertainment revenue was an increase to Hotel Services revenue, which
includes revenue paid by hotels for television programming and broadband Internet service and
support. Hotel Services revenue increased $10.0 million or 8.3%, to $131.2 million for 2009 versus
$121.2 million for 2008. On a per-room basis, monthly Hotel Services revenue for 2009 increased
9.9%, to $5.98 compared to $5.44 in 2008. Monthly television programming revenue per room was
$5.47 for 2009, an 11.4% increase as compared to $4.91 per room in the prior year. These increases
resulted primarily from the continued installation of high definition television systems and
related television programming services. Recurring broadband Internet revenue per room was $0.51
for 2009 compared to $0.53 for the prior year. System Sales and Related Services, which includes
the sale of television programming reception equipment, broadband Internet equipment and other HDTV
equipment and installation services to hotels, increased $8.9 million or 26.4%, to $42.7 million
for 2009 as compared to $33.8 million for 2008. During the year, we completed a large HDTV
equipment conversion contract, which contributed to approximately $4.3 million of the increase.
The remainder of the growth was derived from sales of equipment and professional services to
hotels, offset by a decline in broadband equipment sales.
32
Table of Contents
Other revenue, including the sale of interactive systems and services to healthcare facilities as
well as revenue from Advertising and Media Services, increased $0.7 million or 5.7%, to $14.7
million for 2009 compared to $14.0 million in 2008. For 2009, Healthcare revenue increased by $1.7
million, while Advertising and Media Services revenue decreased by $1.0 million, due to softness in
the economy and the general advertising market.
Total direct costs (exclusive of operating expenses and depreciation and amortization discussed
separately below) were $274.9 million in 2009, a decrease of $14.8 million or 5.1%, as compared to
$289.7 million in 2008. The decrease was primarily due to decreased commissions and royalties of
$21.4 million, which vary with revenue, and a reduction in recurring connectivity and other
Internet support costs of $5.1 million, as a result of our cost reduction initiatives. Partially
offsetting the reductions were increases to television programming costs of $6.3 million, which
varies with related revenue and the number of rooms served, along with the type of services
provided. System and equipment cost of sales was up $5.4 million, and also varies with increased
revenue. Total direct costs as a percentage of revenue were 56.7% in 2009 as compared to 54.3% for
2008. The increase in direct costs as a percentage of revenue was driven by a change in the mix of
products or services sold year over year, primarily driven by an increase in revenue generated by
television programming and system sales, which generally have a lower margin than Guest
Entertainment revenues.
System operations expenses and selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses were $87.1
million in 2009 compared to $109.9 million in 2008. Per average installed room, system operations
expenses also decreased, to $1.94 per room per month for 2009 compared to $2.60 for 2008. SG&A
expenses per average installed room were $2.03 in 2009 compared to $2.34 per average installed room
in 2008. These decreases resulted from the synergies derived from the consolidation of duplicative
service operations, general and administrative functions from the On Command and StayOnline
acquisitions, our labor expense reduction initiatives implemented during 2008 and 2009, and certain
lower operating expenses, including system repair, property taxes, due to a lower taxable asset
base and fuel costs.
Despite the revenue decline, we generated $86.2 million of cash from operating activities during
2009, as compared to $89.9 million in 2008. Cash used for property and equipment additions,
including growth related capital, was $21.3 million. During the year, we also used the cash
generated from operations to pay the required Term B principal repayments of $5.8 million and made
$85.3 million of additional payments against the Term B portion of the Credit Facility.
Hospitality Business
Guest Entertainment (includes purchases for on-demand movies, network-based video games, music and
music videos and television on-demand programming). Our primary source of revenue is providing
in-room, interactive guest entertainment, for which the hotel guest pays on a per-view, hourly or
daily basis.
Our total guest generated revenue depends on a number of factors, including:
Ø | The number of rooms on our network. We can increase revenue over time by increasing the number of rooms served by our interactive television systems. Our ability to expand our room base is dependent on a number of factors, including newly constructed hotel properties and the attractiveness of our technology, service and support to hotels currently operating without an interactive television system. | ||
Ø | The occupancy rate at the property. Our revenue also varies depending on hotel occupancy rates, which are subject to a number of factors, including seasonality, general economic conditions and world events, such as terrorist threats or public health issues. Occupancy rates for the properties we serve are typically higher during the second and third quarters due to seasonal travel patterns. We target higher occupancy properties in diverse demographic and geographic locations in an effort to mitigate occupancy-related risks. | ||
Ø | The popularity, timeliness and amount of content offered at the hotel. Our revenues vary, to a certain degree, with the number, timeliness and popularity of movie content available for viewing, and whether the content is presented in digital or analog format. Historically, a decrease in the availability of popular movie content has adversely impacted revenue, and the availability of high definition content has increased revenue. Although not completely within our control, we seek to program and promote the most popular available movie content and other content to maximize revenue and profitability. |
33
Table of Contents
Ø | The price of the service purchased by the hotel guest. Generally, we control the prices charged for our products and services and manage pricing in an effort to maximize revenue and overall profitability. We establish pricing based on such things as the demographics of the property served, the popularity of the content and overall general economic conditions. Our technology enables us to measure the popularity of our content and make decisions to best position such content and optimize revenue from such content. | ||
Ø | The availability of alternative programming. We compete directly for customers with a variety of other interactive service providers, including other interactive television service providers, cable television companies, direct broadcast satellite companies, television networks and programmers, Internet service providers and portals, technology consulting and service firms, companies offering web sites which provide on-demand movies, rental companies providing DVDs which can be viewed in properly equipped hotel rooms or on other portable viewing devices and hotels which offer in-room laptops with Internet access or other types of Internet access systems. We also compete, in varying degrees, with other leisure-time activities such as movie theaters, the Internet, radio, print media, personal computers and other alternative sources of entertainment and information. | ||
Ø | Consumer Sentiment. The willingness of guests to purchase our entertainment services is also impacted by the general economic environment and its impact on consumer sentiment. Historically, such impacts were not generally material to our revenue results; however, during 2009 and the last half of 2008, the deteriorating economic conditions did have a significant, negative impact on our revenue levels. As economic conditions improve in the future, guest purchase activity may or may not increase to the same levels previously experienced by the Company. |
The primary direct costs of providing Guest Entertainment are:
Ø | license fees paid to major motion picture studios, which are variable and based on a percent of guest-generated revenue, for non-exclusive distribution rights of recently released major motion pictures; | ||
Ø | commissions paid to our hotel customers, which are also variable and based on a percent of guest-generated revenue; | ||
Ø | license fees, which are based on a percent of guest-generated revenue, for television on-demand, music, music videos, video games and sports programming; and | ||
Ø | one-time license fees paid for independent films, most of which are non-rated and intended for mature audiences. |
Hotel Services (includes revenue from hotels for services such as television channels and recurring
broadband Internet service and support to the hotels). Another major source of our revenue is
providing cable television programming and Internet services to the lodging industry, for which the
hotel pays a fixed monthly fee.
Ø | Television Programming. We offer a wide variety of satellite-delivered television programming paid for by the hotel and provided to guests at no charge. The television programming is delivered via satellite, pursuant to an agreement with DIRECTV, and is distributed over the internal hotel network, and typically includes premium channels such as HBO and Showtime, which broadcast major motion pictures and specialty programming, as well as non-premium channels, such as CNN and ESPN. With the launch of the high-definition configuration of our interactive television system, we also began offering high-definition television programming to the extent available from broadcast sources and DIRECTV. | ||
Ø | Broadband Internet Access, Service and Support. We also design, install and operate wired and wireless broadband Internet access systems at hotel properties. These systems control access to the Internet, provide bandwidth management tools and allow hotels to charge or provide the access as a guest amenity. Post-installation, we generate recurring revenue through the ongoing maintenance, service and call center support services to hotel properties installed by us and also to hotel properties installed by other providers. While this is a highly competitive area, we believe we have important advantages as a result of our pro-active monitoring interface with hotel systems to improve up time, existing hotel customer relationships and our nationwide field service network. |
34
Table of Contents
System Sales and Related Services. We also generate revenue from other products and services within
the hotel and lodging industry, including sales of Internet access equipment, other interactive
television systems and equipment, television programming reception equipment, Internet conference
services and professional services, such as design, project management and installation services.
Key Metrics:
Rooms Served
One of the metrics we monitor within our Hospitality business is the number of rooms we serve for
our various services. As of December 31, we had the following number of rooms installed with the
designated service:
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Total rooms served (1) |
1,909,323 | 1,977,015 | 1,962,090 | |||||||||
Total Guest Entertainment rooms (2) |
1,779,979 | 1,866,353 | 1,860,720 | |||||||||
Total HD rooms (3) |
231,588 | 191,491 | 84,327 | |||||||||
Percent of Total Guest Entertainment rooms |
13.0 | % | 10.3 | % | 4.5 | % | ||||||
Total Television Programming (FTG) rooms (4) |
1,087,860 | 1,105,754 | 1,068,256 | |||||||||
Percent of Total Guest Entertainment rooms |
61.1 | % | 59.2 | % | 57.4 | % | ||||||
Total Broadband Internet rooms (5) |
201,936 | 229,003 | 218,860 | |||||||||
Percent of Total rooms served |
10.6 | % | 11.6 | % | 11.2 | % |
(1) | Total rooms served include rooms receiving one or more of our services, including rooms served by international licensees. | |
(2) | Guest Entertainment rooms, of which 85.5% are digital, receive one or more Guest Entertainment services, such as movies, video games, music or other interactive services. | |
(3) | HD rooms are equipped with high-definition capabilities. | |
(4) | Television programming (FTG) rooms receive basic or premium television programming. | |
(5) | Represents rooms receiving high-speed Internet service. |
High Definition Room Growth
We also track the increasing penetration of our high-definition television (HDTV) system, since
rooms equipped with HDTV services typically generate higher revenue, in a stable economic
environment, from Guest Entertainment and Hotel Services than rooms equipped with our other VOD
systems. HDTV room growth is occurring as we install our HDTV system in newly contracted rooms and
convert select rooms to the HDTV system in exchange for long-term contract extensions. We
installed our systems in the following number of net new rooms and had the following total rooms
installed as of December 31:
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Net new HDTV rooms |
40,097 | 105,099 | 60,825 | |||||||||
Total HDTV rooms installed |
231,588 | 191,491 | 84,327 | |||||||||
HDTV rooms as a percent of total Guest Entertainment rooms |
13.0 | % | 10.3 | % | 4.5 | % |
HDTV rooms, including new installations and major upgrades, are equipped with high-definition
capabilities.
35
Table of Contents
Capital Investment Per Installed Room
The average investment per room associated with an installation can fluctuate due to the type of
interactive television system installed, engineering efforts, component costs, product
segmentation, cost of assembly and installation, average property size, certain fixed costs and
hotel capital contributions. The following table sets forth our average installation and
conversion investment cost per room on a comparable room base during the years ended December 31:
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Average cost per room new installation |
$ | 345 | $ | 389 | $ | 399 | ||||||
Average cost per room conversion |
$ | 235 | $ | 295 | $ | 309 | ||||||
Average cost per HD room new installation |
$ | 339 | $ | 398 | $ | 460 | ||||||
Average cost per HD room conversion |
$ | 241 | $ | 320 | $ | 329 |
The decrease in the average cost per new and converted HD rooms from 2007 to 2009 was
primarily driven by larger average room sizes for properties installed, lower component and
overhead costs, engineering efforts and hotels contributing a greater share of total installation
costs through purchases of systems and equipment.
Average Revenue Per Room
We monitor the revenue we generate per average Hospitality room. Guest Entertainment revenue can
fluctuate based on several factors, including occupancy, consumer sentiment, mix of travelers, the
availability of high definition and alternative programming, the popularity of movie content, the
mix of services purchased and the overall economic environment. During 2009, occupancy rates were
8.8% lower than 2008 levels. Hotel Services revenue can fluctuate based on the percentage of our
hotels purchasing cable television programming services from us, the type of services provided at
each site, as well as the number of hotels purchasing broadband service and support from us.
System Sales and Related Services revenue can fluctuate based on the number of system and equipment
sales, including broadband systems sales. The following table sets forth the components of our
Hospitality revenue per room for the years ended December 31:
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Average monthly revenue per room: |
||||||||||||
Hospitality |
||||||||||||
Guest Entertainment |
$ | 13.49 | $ | 16.38 | $ | 18.04 | ||||||
Hotel Services |
5.98 | 5.44 | 4.68 | |||||||||
System Sales and Related Services |
1.95 | 1.51 | 1.22 | |||||||||
Total Hospitality revenue per room |
$ | 21.42 | $ | 23.33 | $ | 23.94 | ||||||
Certain contracts within our acquired On Command customer base included substantial discounts
for satellite-delivered basic and premium television programming, which negatively impacted Hotel
Services revenue. We expect to eliminate these discounts as we continue to upgrade with
high-definition television capabilities.
36
Table of Contents
Direct Costs
Guest Entertainment direct costs vary based on content license fees, the mix of Guest Entertainment
products purchased and the commission earned by the hotel. Hotel Services direct costs include the
cost of cable television programming and the cost of broadband Internet support services. The cost
of System Sales and Related Services primarily includes the cost of the systems and equipment sold
to hotels. The overall direct cost margin primarily varies based on the composition of revenue.
The following table sets forth our Hospitality direct expenses per room and as a percentage of
related revenue during the years ended December 31:
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Percent | Percent | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||||||
of Related | of Related | of Related | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Revenue | Amount | Revenue | Amount | Revenue | |||||||||||||||||||
Direct costs per room: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hospitality |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guest Entertainment |
$ | 5.41 | 40.1 | % | $ | 6.40 | 39.0 | % | $ | 7.10 | 39.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Hotel Services |
5.23 | 87.4 | % | 4.99 | 91.7 | % | 4.49 | 93.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
System Sales and Related Services |
1.40 | 71.8 | % | 1.12 | 74.6 | % | 0.89 | 74.1 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total Hospitality direct costs per room |
$ | 12.04 | 56.2 | % | $ | 12.51 | 53.6 | % | $ | 12.48 | 51.8 | % | ||||||||||||
The decrease in the average direct cost per Guest Entertainment room varies with revenue and
was driven by lower commissions earned by the hotels and offset by a change in the mix of movie
products purchased.
Other Businesses
Other revenue is a combination of our Advertising and Healthcare businesses.
We deliver advertising-supported media into select hotel segments, from which we earn revenue from
the sale of television commercials or other marketing based programs. The demographic and
professional profile of the traveler within our room base tends to have characteristics we believe
may be attractive to consumer marketing organizations. By approaching guests with relevant
messaging when they are in the comfort of a hotel room, free of distractions, advertisers have a
prime opportunity to capture the attention of and connect with these desired consumers. In
addition to market demands, our revenue is also dependent on rooms available to promote customer
products and services. As of December 31, 2009, we provide advertising media services to over 1.2
million hotel rooms compared to 0.9 million rooms in 2008. We also deliver targeted advertising to
more than 364,000 hotel rooms on 10 popular satellite-delivered channels.
The healthcare market in the United States consists of approximately 900,000 hospital beds across
5,900 facilities. We believe most hospitals currently do not have any form of interactive
television services. The main interests in interactive television services include driving patient
satisfaction, providing robust patient education with comprehensive reporting and operation
efficiencies and cost savings for automating processes such as integrated food ordering. Our
Healthcare revenue is generated through a variety of services and solutions provided to care
facilities, including:
Ø | revenue generated from the sale of the interactive system hardware, software license and installation services; | ||
Ø | revenue from the sale and installation of DIRECTV satellite equipment and related programming; | ||
Ø | revenue from recurring support agreements for interactive content, software maintenance and technical field service support, including service agreements covering cable plant, DIRECTV satellite equipment and interactive systems; and | ||
Ø | revenue generated from cable plant design, modification and installation, as well as television installation services. |
As of December 31, 2009, we have equipped 45 healthcare facilities, or 9,200 beds, with these
services and solutions to improve the overall patient experience, as compared to 28 properties or
6,500 rooms as of December 31, 2008.
37
Table of Contents
General Operations
Total Operating Expenses
We monitor and manage the operating expenses per room. System operations expenses consist of costs
directly related to the operation and maintenance of systems at hotel sites. Selling, general and
administrative expenses (SG&A) primarily include payroll costs, stock based compensation,
engineering development costs and legal, marketing, professional and compliance costs. The
following table sets forth the components of our operating expenses per room for the years ended
December 31:
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
System operations expenses (1) |
$ | 1.94 | $ | 2.60 | $ | 2.71 | ||||||
SG&A expenses (1) |
2.03 | 2.34 | 2.77 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization (D&A) |
4.16 | 5.05 | 5.56 | |||||||||
Amortization of acquired intangibles |
0.42 | 0.52 | 0.51 | |||||||||
Goodwill impairment charge |
| 0.50 | | |||||||||
Restructuring charge |
0.02 | 0.23 | 0.64 | |||||||||
Other operating income (2) |
| (0.05 | ) | (0.05 | ) | |||||||
$ | 8.57 | $ | 11.19 | $ | 12.14 | |||||||
System operations as a percent of total revenue |
8.8 | % | 10.8 | % | 11.1 | % | ||||||
SG&A as a percent of total revenue |
9.2 | % | 9.7 | % | 11.5 | % | ||||||
D&A as a percent of total revenue |
18.8 | % | 21.1 | % | 22.2 | % | ||||||
Amortization of acquired intangibles as a percent of
total revenue |
1.9 | % | 2.2 | % | 1.8 | % | ||||||
Total operating expenses as a percent of total revenue |
38.8 | % | 46.7 | % | 48.7 | % |
(1) | System operations and SG&A expense decreases resulted primarily from integration synergies from the StayOnline and On Command acquisitions. | |
(2) | Other operating income for 2008 includes net proceeds received from insurance related to business interruption and property damage claims associated with Hurricane Katrina. Other operating income for 2007 includes recoveries related to early contract terminations. |
Special Note Regarding the Use of Non-GAAP Financial Information
To supplement our consolidated financial statements presented in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP), we use free cash flow, a non-GAAP
measure derived from results based on GAAP. The presentation of this additional information is not
meant to be considered superior to, in isolation of, or as a substitute for, results prepared in
accordance with GAAP.
We define free cash flow, a non-GAAP measure, as cash provided by operating activities less cash
used for certain investing activities, including growth-related capital, and consideration paid for
acquisitions. Free cash flow is a key liquidity measure but should not be construed as an
alternative to cash flows from operating activities or as a measure of our profitability or
performance. We provide information about free cash flow because we believe it is a useful way for
us, and our investors, to measure our ability to satisfy cash needs, including interest payments on
our debt, taxes and capital expenditures. GAAP requires us to provide information about cash flow
generated from operations. Our definition of free cash flow does not take into account our debt
service requirements or other commitments. Accordingly, free cash flow is not necessarily
indicative of amounts of cash which may be available to us for discretionary purposes. Our method
of computing free cash flow may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other
companies.
38
Table of Contents
Free Cash Flow
One of our goals is to increase the level of free cash flow we generate. We manage our free cash
flow by seeking to maximize the amount of cash we generate from our operations and managing the
level of our investment activity. During 2009, we allocated a substantial portion of our cash flow
from operations to the repayment of debt and used the balance of the cash flow for capital
expenditures. We can manage capital expenditures by reducing the per-room installation cost of a
room and by varying the number of rooms we install in any given period.
Levels of free cash flow are set forth in the following table (dollar amounts in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Cash provided by operating activities (1) |
$ | 86,172 | $ | 89,853 | $ | 58,869 | ||||||
Property and equipment additions |
(21,341 | ) | (64,407 | ) | (79,097 | ) | ||||||
64,831 | 25,446 | (20,228 | ) | |||||||||
Cash used for acquisitions and other activities |
| | (354,177 | ) | ||||||||
$ | 64,831 | $ | 25,446 | $ | (374,405 | ) | ||||||
(1) | Cash provided by operating activities include acquisitions and integration of On Command, THN and StayOnline. |
Capital investment, including expansion capital, which we define as capital used for new room
installations, is set forth in the following table (dollar amounts in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Expansion capital investment (1) |
$ | 5,774 | $ | 22,896 | $ | 24,668 | ||||||
Renewal investment (2) |
5,499 | 18,919 | 25,772 | |||||||||
Corporate capital and minor extensions (3) |
10,068 | 22,592 | 28,657 | |||||||||
$ | 21,341 | $ | 64,407 | $ | 79,097 | |||||||
(1) | Capital investment to install newly contracted rooms with our digital or HDTV system. | |
(2) | Capital investment to convert rooms to our digital or HDTV system in exchange for long-term contract extensions. | |
(3) | Capital investment for corporate infrastructure, including computers, equipment, software development, minor system upgrades and system components. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We ended the year with cash of $17.0 million and were in compliance with all of the Credit Facility
covenants. For the year, cash provided by operating activities was $86.2 million, which was
reduced by $2.3 million of cash used primarily for restructuring and reorganization related
activities. In 2009, we used $21.3 million of the cash we generated for property and equipment
additions, including growth related capital. During 2009, we made additional payments of $85.3
million against the Term B portion of our Credit Facility, including the required $27.7 million
from our preferred stock offering, in addition to the scheduled quarterly payments of $5.8 million.
We also utilized $23.7 million for the acquisition of debt and $1.7 million for preferred stock
dividends. During 2008, cash provided by operating activities was $89.9 million, which was reduced
by $9.5 million of cash used primarily for restructuring, integration and severance related
activities. During 2008, we used $64.4 million for property and equipment additions and made
additional payments of $27.5 million against the Term B portion of our Credit Facility, in addition
to the scheduled quarterly payments of $6.3 million.
39
Table of Contents
In June 2009, we entered into a purchase agreement to sell 50,000 shares of our 10% Series B
Cumulative Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share, with a liquidation
preference of $1,000 per share. The initial purchaser was also granted a 30-day option to purchase
up to an additional 7,500 shares of the preferred stock to cover overallotments. We completed our
offering of 57,500 shares (inclusive of the initial purchasers option to purchase the additional
7,500 shares), bringing the total aggregate liquidation preference of the preferred stock sold to
$57.5 million. Net proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock were $53.7 million, with offering
and related costs totaling $3.8 million. We were required to use 50% of the proceeds, or $27.7
million, to pay down our Credit Facility.
Our principal sources of liquidity are our cash from operations, our cash on hand and the $50.0
million revolver portion of our Credit Facility, which matures in 2013. We believe our cash on
hand, operating cash flow and borrowing available under the Credit Facility will be sufficient to
fund our business and comply with our financing obligations. During 2010, we plan to continue to
allocate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the repayment of debt and use
the balance of the cash flow for capital expenditures. As of December 31, 2009, working capital
was $(4.9) million, compared to $(10.8) million at December 31, 2008.
The collectability of our receivables is reasonably assured, as supported by our broad customer
base. Our interactive hotel base is well diversified in terms of (i) location; (ii) demographics;
and (iii) customer contracts. We provide our services to various hotel chains, ownership groups
and management companies. In accordance with our hotel contracts, monies collected by the hotel
for interactive television services are held in trust on our behalf, thereby limiting our risk from
hotel bankruptcies.
In order to fund our acquisitions of On Command and StayOnline, in April 2007 we entered into a
$675.0 million bank Credit Facility, comprised of a $625.0 million term loan, which matures in
April 2014, and a $50.0 million revolving Credit Facility, which matures in April 2013. The term
loan originally required quarterly repayments of $1.6 million, which began September 30, 2007. The
required quarterly payments have been adjusted for the reduction in principal as a result of our
early repayments against the loan. For the fourth quarter of 2009, the adjusted quarterly payment
requirement was $1.3 million. The term loan bears interest at our option of (1) the banks base
rate plus a margin of 1.00% or (2) LIBOR plus a margin of 2.00%. The agreement provides that when
our consolidated leverage ratio is below 3.25 times, the term loan bears interest at our option of
(1) the banks base rate plus a margin of 0.75% or (2) LIBOR plus a margin of 1.75%. The term loan
is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of the Company. The Credit Facility includes
terms and conditions which require compliance with leverage and interest coverage covenants. The
Credit Facility also stipulates we enter into hedge agreements to provide at least 50% of the
outstanding term loan into a fixed interest rate for a period not less than two years. We have
entered into fixed rate swap agreements for $437.5 million or 88% of the outstanding term loan,
with fixed interest rates ranging from 4.97% to 5.09% (see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements). The term loan interest rate as of December 31, 2009 was 2.26%. The aggregate
weighted average interest rate as of December 31, 2009 was 7.15%, which includes the term loan and
lease interest rates and the difference in the swaps fixed interest rate versus LIBOR. As of
December 31, 2009, we were in compliance with all financial covenants required of our bank Credit
Facility.
40
Table of Contents
Our leverage and interest coverage ratios were as follows for the years ended December 31:
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Actual consolidated leverage ratio (1) (3) |
3.82 | 4.30 | 4.39 | |||||||||
Maximum per covenant |
4.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | |||||||||
Actual consolidated interest coverage ratio (2) (3) |
3.23 | 3.22 | 3.47 | |||||||||
Minimum per covenant |
2.75 | 2.50 | 2.25 |
(1) | Our maximum consolidated leverage ratio is the total amount of all indebtedness of the Company, determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP, divided by operating income exclusive of depreciation and amortization and adjusted (plus or minus) for certain other miscellaneous cash items, non-cash items and non-recurring items, as defined by the terms of the bank Credit Facility. | |
(2) | Our minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio is a function of operating income exclusive of depreciation and amortization and adjusted (plus or minus) for certain other miscellaneous cash items, non-cash items and non-recurring items divided by interest expense, as defined by the terms of the bank Credit Facility. | |
(3) | Maximum consolidated leverage ratio and minimum consolidated interest coverage ratios are defined terms of the bank Credit Facility and are presented here to demonstrate compliance with the covenants in our Credit Facility, as noncompliance with such covenants could have a material adverse effect on us. |
We do not utilize special purpose entities or off balance sheet financial arrangements.
Our debt covenant ratios will change in future periods as follows:
Q3 2010 | ||||||||
Q1 2010 | to maturity (2014) | |||||||
Maximum consolidated leverage ratio |
3.75 | 3.50 | ||||||
Minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio |
3.00 | 3.00 |
41
Table of Contents
In order to continue operating efficiently and expand our business, we must remain in compliance
with covenants outlined in our Credit Facility. Our ability to remain in compliance with those
covenants will depend on our ability to generate sufficient Adjusted Operating Cash Flow (as
defined in the Credit Facility) and cash from operations, to manage our level of capital investment
and to continue to reduce our debt. We continue taking actions within our control to reduce our
debt and remain in compliance with our debt covenants. The actions within our control include our
prudent management of capital investment and operating costs and exploring other alternatives,
which may include seeking an amendment to our Credit Facility, raising additional capital, wage
reductions, reduced service hours or other reductions to the workforce. In June 2009, we completed
a preferred stock offering, with net proceeds of $53.7 million (see Note 12 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements). We believe we are balancing the interest of our customers and our Company
by reducing our capital investments, reducing our operating cost structure and aggressively
reducing the level of debt. We achieved a consolidated leverage ratio of 3.82 compared to the
maximum allowable of 4.00 for the fourth quarter of 2009. Our ability to continue to comply with
these covenants is subject to the general economic climate and business conditions beyond our
control. During 2009, as part of our debt reduction initiative, we acquired, through a
wholly-owned subsidiary as a permitted investment under our Credit Facility, $31.5 million of
outstanding debt at 70.5% of par value and recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of $9.3
million. Under our Credit Facility, we can make permitted investments, as defined by the Credit
Facility, of up to $25.0 million. We are committed to reducing our debt and are taking actions to
remain in compliance with our debt covenants. Though we expect to comply with all debt covenants
during 2010, our ability to comply with these covenants depends on achieving our planned operating
results and making further debt reductions. Given the continuing softness in the economy and the
uncertainties impacting travel and lodging, in addition to the constraints in the credit markets,
consumer conservatism and other market dynamics, we cannot assure we will be able to meet our
planned results and required covenants. If we are not able to remain in compliance with the debt
covenants, it will likely have a significant, unfavorable impact on our business and financial
condition and we may need to amend the Credit Facility to seek a waiver of the covenants. An
amendment to the Credit Facility may significantly increase our interest costs, add upfront fees or
modify other terms less favorable to us than we currently have in our Credit Facility. In the
event our lenders will not amend or waive the covenants, the debt would be due and we would need to
seek alternative financing. We cannot provide assurance we would be able to obtain alternative
financing. If we were not able to secure alternative financing, this would have a substantial
adverse impact on the Company.
The Credit Facility also requires we notify the agent upon the occurrence of a Material Adverse
Effect prior to any draw on the Companys revolving Credit Facility, as such terms are defined and
used within our bank Credit Facility. However, under the Credit Facility, the provision of such a
notice is not an event of default, but if such an event occurred, it could restrict the Companys
ability to obtain additional financing under the revolving Credit Facility. As of December 31,
2009, we are not aware of any events which would qualify as a Material Adverse Effect under the
Credit Facility. The total amount of long-term debt outstanding, including the current portion, as
of December 31, 2009 was $469.9 million versus $588.5 million as of December 31, 2008.
In April 2007, we entered into interest rate swap agreements with notional values of $312.5
million, at a fixed rate of 5.09%, and $125.0 million, at a fixed rate of 4.97%, both of which
expire in June 2011. These swap arrangements effectively change the underlying debt from a
variable interest rate to a fixed interest rate for the term of the swap agreements. The swap
agreements were designated as, and met the criteria for, cash flow hedges and are not considered
speculative in nature. All of the swap agreements have been issued by Credit Suisse International.
The Credit Facility provides for the issuance of letters of credit up to $15.0 million, subject to
customary terms and conditions. As of December 31, 2009, we had outstanding letters of credit
totaling $427,000.
42
Table of Contents
Obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2009 were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
Payments due by period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less than | 2 3 | 4 5 | Over | |||||||||||||||||
Total | 1 year | years | years | 5 years | ||||||||||||||||
Contractual obligations: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt(s) |
$ | 469,946 | $ | 6,101 | $ | 11,124 | $ | 452,721 | $ | | ||||||||||
Interest on bank term loan (1) |
47,264 | 11,335 | 22,239 | 13,690 | | |||||||||||||||
Interest on derivative instruments |
31,809 | 21,264 | 10,545 | | | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease payments |
4,339 | 2,255 | 1,475 | 548 | 61 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations (2) |
8,003 | 5,407 | 1,780 | 816 | | |||||||||||||||
Minimum royalties and commissions
(3) |
2,681 | 2,309 | 372 | | | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations |
$ | 564,042 | $ | 48,671 | $ | 47,535 | $ | 467,775 | $ | 61 | ||||||||||
Amount of commitment expiration per period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less than | 2 3 | 4 5 | Over | |||||||||||||||||
Total | 1 year | years | years | 5 years | ||||||||||||||||
Other commercial commitments: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Standby letters of credit |
$ | 427 | $ | 427 | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
(1) | Interest payments are estimates based on current LIBOR and scheduled debt amortization. | |
(2) | Consists of open purchase orders and commitments, primarily for the procurement of system components. | |
(3) | In connection with our programming related agreements, we may guarantee minimum royalties for specific periods or by individual programming content. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
During the second quarter of 2009, an amendment was made to our non-exclusive license agreement
with Nintendo, which expires in May 2013. Under the original terms of the agreement, we paid a
monthly royalty equal to a percent of revenue generated from the sale of Nintendo video game
services, subject to a monthly minimum. Under the amended terms, effective April 1, 2009, the
royalty amount is strictly a percent of revenue and the monthly minimum royalty obligation has been
eliminated.
Seasonality
Our quarterly operating results are subject to fluctuation, depending upon hotel occupancy rates
and other factors, including travel patterns and the economy. Our hotel customers typically
experience higher occupancy rates during the second and third quarters, due to seasonal travel
patterns and, accordingly, we historically have higher revenue and cash flow in those quarters.
However, quarterly revenue can be affected by the availability of popular content during those
quarters and by consumer purchasing behavior. We have no control over when new content is released
or how popular it will be, or the effect of economic conditions on consumer behavior.
43
Table of Contents
Market Conditions
Due to current economic conditions, our business could be adversely impacted by conditions
affecting the lodging industrys performance. Our results are closely linked to the performance of
the lodging industry, where occupancy rates may fluctuate resulting from various factors. The
percentage of occupied rooms that buy movies and other services at the property also varies over
time with general economic conditions, including, but not limited to, consumer sentiment, and other
factors. Reduction in hotel occupancy, resulting from the general economic environment or other
changes in market conditions, such as a recession or significant slow-down in economic activity, or
significant international crises, could adversely impact our business, financial condition and
results of operations. The overall travel industry can be, and has been in the past, adversely
affected by weaker general economic climates, geopolitical instability and concerns about public
health. Factors such as the cost of fuel, airline fares, and other economic conditions which
result in a decrease in business or leisure travel can affect hotel occupancy and the demand for
some of our products and services. Also, our goodwill and intangible assets may be impaired if
market conditions deteriorate.
Other market risk factors are included in Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors.
44
Table of Contents
Results of Operations Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
Revenue Analysis. Total revenue for 2009 was $484.5 million, a decrease of $49.4 million or 9.3%,
compared to 2008. The decrease in revenue was primarily from a decrease in Guest Entertainment
revenue, partially offset by increases in Hotel Services, System Sales and Related Services and
Healthcare revenue. The following table sets forth the components of our revenue (dollar amounts
in thousands) for the years ended December 31:
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Percent | Percent | |||||||||||||||
of Total | of Total | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Revenues | Amount | Revenues | |||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Hospitality |
||||||||||||||||
Guest Entertainment |
$ | 295,817 | 61.1 | % | $ | 364,956 | 68.4 | % | ||||||||
Hotel Services |
131,222 | 27.1 | % | 121,177 | 22.7 | % | ||||||||||
System Sales and Related Services |
42,704 | 8.8 | % | 33,789 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||
Total Hospitality |
469,743 | 97.0 | % | 519,922 | 97.4 | % | ||||||||||
Other |
14,749 | 3.0 | % | 13,957 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||
$ | 484,492 | 100.0 | % | $ | 533,879 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
Hospitality
Hospitality revenue, which includes Guest Entertainment, Hotel Services and System Sales and
Related Services, decreased $50.2 million or 9.7%, to $469.7 million in 2009 compared to $519.9
million in 2008. Due to softness in the travel economy, hotel occupancy declined by 8.8% during
2009 compared to last year. Average monthly Hospitality revenue per room was $21.42 for 2009, a
decrease of 8.2% as compared to $23.33 per room in the prior year.
Guest Entertainment revenue, which includes on-demand entertainment such as movies, games, music
and other interactive services delivered through the television, decreased $69.2 million or 18.9%,
to $295.8 million in 2009 as compared to $365.0 million in 2008. The following table sets forth
information with respect to revenue per Guest Entertainment room for the years ended December 31:
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Average monthly revenue per room: |
||||||||
Movie revenue |
$ | 12.66 | $ | 15.20 | ||||
Other interactive service revenue |
0.83 | 1.18 | ||||||
Total Guest Entertainment per room |
$ | 13.49 | $ | 16.38 | ||||
On a per-room basis, monthly Guest Entertainment revenue for 2009 declined 17.6%, to $13.49
compared to $16.38 for 2008. This change in revenue was impacted by the decline in occupancy, as
well as a cautious consumer buying pattern. Average monthly movie revenue per room was $12.66 for
2009, a 16.7% reduction as compared to $15.20 per room in the prior year. Non-movie Guest
Entertainment revenue per room decreased 29.7%, to $0.83 for 2009, driven by reductions in
on-demand television purchases, games and television Internet purchases.
45
Table of Contents
Hotel Services revenue, which includes revenue paid by hotels for cable television programming and
broadband Internet service and support, increased $10.0 million or 8.3%, to $131.2 million during
2009 versus $121.2 million in 2008. The following table sets forth information with respect to
Hotel Services revenue per room for the years ending December 31:
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Average monthly revenue per room: |
||||||||
Cable television programming |
$ | 5.47 | $ | 4.91 | ||||
Broadband |
0.51 | 0.53 | ||||||
Total Hotel Services per room |
$ | 5.98 | $ | 5.44 | ||||
On a per-room basis, monthly Hotel Services revenue for 2009 increased 9.9%, to $5.98 compared to
$5.44 for 2008. Monthly cable television programming revenue per room increased 11.4%, to $5.47
for 2009 as compared to $4.91 for 2008. These increases resulted primarily from the continued
installation of high definition television systems and related television programming services.
Recurring broadband Internet revenue per room for 2009 was $0.51 versus $0.53 for 2008.
System Sales and Related Services revenue includes the sale of television programming reception
equipment, broadband Internet equipment and other HDTV equipment and installation services to
hotels. For 2009, revenue increased $8.9 million or 26.4%, to $42.7 million as compared to $33.8
million for 2008. During the current year, we completed a large HDTV equipment conversion
contract, which contributed to approximately $4.3 million of the increase. The remainder of the
growth was derived from sales of equipment and professional services to hotels, partially offset by
a decline in broadband equipment sales.
Other
Other revenue includes the sale of interactive systems and services to healthcare facilities, as
well as revenue from Advertising and Media Services. Advertising and Media Services revenue was
generated primarily by The Hotel Networks, a subsidiary acquired as part of the On Command
acquisition. Other revenue increased $0.7 million or 5.7%, to $14.7 million during 2009 as
compared to $14.0 million for 2008. Healthcare revenue increased by $1.7 million compared to 2008,
while Advertising and Media Services revenue decreased $1.0 million versus the prior year, due to
softness in the economy and the general advertising market.
Direct Costs (exclusive of operating expenses and depreciation and amortization discussed
separately below). Total direct costs were $274.9 million in 2009, a decrease of $14.8 million or
5.1%, as compared to $289.7 million in 2008. Total direct costs were 56.7% of revenue for 2009 as
compared to 54.3% for 2008. The percentage increase resulted from a change in the mix of products
or services sold year over year, driven by the increased percentage of revenue generated by
television programming and system sales, which generally have lower margins than Guest
Entertainment revenues. Direct costs related to the Hospitality business, which includes Guest
Entertainment, Hotel Services and System Sales and Related Services, were $264.1 million for 2009
compared to $278.8 in 2008. The decrease in total direct costs was primarily related to decreases
in hotel commissions and royalties, which vary with revenue, and recurring connectivity and other
Internet support costs, a result of our cost reduction initiatives. These decreases were partially
offset by increases in television programming costs, which vary with related revenue and the number
of rooms served, along with the type of services provided, and system and equipment cost of sales,
which vary with increased revenue.
46
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the primary change drivers of total direct costs for the years ended
December 31:
2009 | 2008 | Change | ||||||||||
Direct costs as a percent of revenue
(exclusive of operating expenses and depreciation
and amortization discussed separately below): |
56.7 | % | 54.3 | % | 2.4 | % | ||||||
Change drivers: |
||||||||||||
Hospitality |
||||||||||||
Guest Entertainment |
(2.2 | )% | ||||||||||
Hotel Services |
2.9 | % | ||||||||||
System Sales and Related Services |
1.6 | % | ||||||||||
Other |
0.1 | % | ||||||||||
2.4 | % | |||||||||||
On a weighted average basis, Hospitality direct costs increased 230 basis points, primarily from a
290 basis point increase related to lower margin cable television programming and a 160 basis point
increase related to the sale of professional services and equipment to hotels. These increases
were partially offset by a 220 basis point decrease in direct costs related to movie-based Guest
Entertainment revenue. Other direct costs, primarily associated with the sale of systems and
equipment to healthcare facilities, which requires no capital contribution but generate a lower
profit margin than our traditional Guest Entertainment products, increased 10 basis points.
Operating Expenses. The following table sets forth information in regard to operating expenses for
the years ended December 31 (dollar amounts in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Percent | Percent | |||||||||||||||
of Total | of Total | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Revenues | Amount | Revenues | |||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
System operations |
$ | 42,605 | 8.8 | % | $ | 57,853 | 10.8 | % | ||||||||
Selling, general and administrative (1) |
44,538 | 9.2 | % | 52,042 | 9.7 | % | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
91,135 | 18.8 | % | 112,511 | 21.1 | % | ||||||||||
Amortization of acquired intangibles |
9,174 | 1.9 | % | 11,549 | 2.2 | % | ||||||||||
Goodwill impairment charge |
| | 11,212 | 2.1 | % | |||||||||||
Restructuring charge (2) |
603 | 0.1 | % | 5,047 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||
Other operating income (3) |
(126 | ) | (0.0 | )% | (964 | ) | (0.2 | )% | ||||||||
Total operating expenses |
$ | 187,929 | 38.8 | % | $ | 249,250 | 46.7 | % | ||||||||
(1) | SG&A expenses include $0 and $1.0 million for 2009 and 2008, respectively, directly related to integration activities from the StayOnline and On Command acquisitions. | |
(2) | Restructuring costs are defined as costs associated with the closing, disposal or exit of certain duplicate facilities or operations including termination benefits and costs to consolidate facilities or relocate employees. The Company will not realize future benefits from these costs. Includes $0.6 million and $1.9 million for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of severance costs related to the 2008 cost reorganization and cost reduction initiative. | |
(3) | Other operating income for 2008 includes net proceeds received from insurance related to business interruption and property damage claims associated with Hurricane Katrina. |
47
Table of Contents
System operations expenses decreased $15.3 million or 26.4%, to $42.6 million in 2009 as compared
to $57.9 million in 2008. As a percentage of total revenue, system operations expenses decreased
to 8.8% this year as compared to 10.8% in the prior year. Per average installed room, system
operations expenses also decreased, to $1.94 per room per month for 2009 compared to $2.60 for
2008, due to the synergies derived from the consolidation of the acquired On Command operations,
our labor expense reduction initiatives implemented during 2008 and 2009 and lower system repair
costs, property taxes, due to a lower taxable asset base and fuel costs.
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses decreased $7.5 million, as a result of the
synergies derived from the consolidation of duplicative SG&A functions from our acquisitions and
our expense reduction initiatives implemented during 2008 and 2009, from $52.0 million in 2008 to
$44.5 million in the current year. There were no integration costs for acquisitions included
within this years SG&A expenses, compared to $1.0 million in the prior year related to the
acquisition of StayOnline and On Command. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A expenses were 9.2% in
the current year compared to 9.7% in 2008. SG&A expenses per average installed room were $2.03 in
2009 compared to $2.34 per average installed room in 2008.
Depreciation and amortization expenses were $91.1 million in 2009 as compared to $112.5 million in
2008. Amortization of acquired intangibles, related to the acquisitions of StayOnline and On
Command, was $9.2 million in 2009 compared to $11.5 million in the prior year. The declines were
due to the reduction in capital investments over the past two years and certain assets becoming
fully depreciated. As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and amortization expenses were 18.8%
in 2009 compared to 21.1% in 2008, while amortization of acquired intangibles was 1.9% of revenue
in 2009 compared to 2.2% in 2008.
In 2008, we incurred goodwill and purchased intangibles impairment charge of $11.2 million, related
to Advertising and Media Services, and we recorded a write down of $0.6 million related to On
Command purchased intangibles. The goodwill impairment charge was primarily driven by the erosion
of the capital markets, the general economy and the resulting decrease in our stock price during
the fourth quarter of 2008. The general economic conditions had a significant impact on the
overall advertising market. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
During 2009, we incurred restructuring costs of approximately $680,000 related to facility
consolidation, partially offset by unused severance benefits of approximately $77,000. During
2008, we incurred costs of $5.0 million related to post acquisition restructuring activities.
Other operating income for 2008 included insurance proceeds of $815,000 related to property damage
and business interruption due to Hurricane Katrina.
Operating Income (Loss). As a result of the factors described above, operating income was $21.7
million in 2009 as compared to an operating loss of $(5.1) million in the prior year.
Interest Expense. Interest expense was $38.1 million in the current year versus $42.6 million in
2008. The decrease resulted from the change in weighted average long-term debt, to $532.9 million
at December 31, 2009 from $616.8 million at December 31, 2008. The weighted average interest rate
increased to 7.15% for the current year versus 6.90% for 2008. This increase was due to the higher
fixed interest rates of our swaps compared to the lower variable rate of our term loan and the
effect of fixed Credit Facility fees.
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt. During 2009, we acquired $31.5 million of outstanding debt as part
of our debt reduction initiative, at 70.5% of par value, and recorded a gain on extinguishment of
the debt of $9.3 million. The acquisition was made through a wholly-owned subsidiary, a permitted
investment under our Credit Facility. In 2008, we acquired $2.9 million of outstanding debt at 50%
of par value and recorded a gain on the extinguishment of $1.4 million.
Loss on Early Retirement of Debt. During 2009, we made additional payments of $85.3 million on our
term loan, including $27.7 million of payments made using proceeds from the sale of convertible
preferred stock, and we wrote off $1.5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs associated with
the early retirement of our debt. During 2008, we made additional payments of $27.5 million on our
term loan and wrote off $0.4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the early
retirement of our debt.
48
Table of Contents
Other Expense. In 2009, we recorded a total of $0.7 million of other expense. In 2009, due to
continued softness in certain markets, we recorded an investment loss of $1.4 million related to
our 2007 investment of $5.0 million in a high-speed Internet service provider. We also recorded
$0.7 million of other income, including interest income. In 2008, we recorded a total of $0.9
million of other expense. We recorded an investment loss of $0.6 million related to the same
investment, and recorded $0.3 million of other expense, net of interest income.
Taxes. During 2009, we incurred state franchise taxes of $0.8 million. For 2008, we also incurred
state franchise taxes of $0.8 million.
Net Loss. As a result of the factors described above, net loss was $(10.2) million for 2009
compared to a net loss of $(48.4) million in the prior year.
49
Table of Contents
Results of Operations Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
Revenue Analysis. Total revenue for 2008 was $533.9 million, an increase of $48.3 million or 9.9%,
compared to 2007. The growth was driven by increases in Guest Entertainment and Hotel Services
revenue, primarily related to the 2007 acquisitions of On Command and StayOnline, and an increase
in System Sales and Related Services revenue, offset by decreases in hotel room occupancy and
related guest purchases.
Hospitality revenue, which includes Guest Entertainment, Hotel Services and System Sales and
Related Services, increased $45.4 million or 9.6%, to $519.9 million in 2008 compared to $474.5
million in 2007. Average monthly Hospitality revenue per room was $23.33 for 2008, a decrease of
2.5% as compared to $23.94 in the prior year. Guest Entertainment revenue, which includes
on-demand entertainment such as movies, games, music and other interactive services delivered
through the television, increased $10.0 million or 2.8%, to $365.0 million in 2008 as compared to
$355.0 million in 2007. Hotel Services revenue, which includes revenue paid by hotels for
television programming and broadband Internet service and support, increased $27.3 million or
29.0%, to $121.2 million during 2008 versus $93.9 million in 2007. System Sales and Related
Services revenue, which includes the sale of television programming reception equipment, broadband
Internet equipment and other HDTV equipment and installation services to hotels, increased $8.3
million or 32.5%, to $33.8 million for 2008 as compared to $25.5 million for 2007.
Other revenue, which includes the sale of interactive systems and services to healthcare
facilities, as well as revenue from Advertising and Media Services (primarily generated by The
Hotel Networks, a subsidiary acquired as part of the On Command acquisitions), increased $2.9
million or 25.6%, to $14.0 million during 2008 as compared to $11.1 million for 2007. Healthcare
revenue increased by $1.6 million compared to 2007, while Advertising and Media Services revenue
increased by $1.3 million compared to 2007.
Direct costs (exclusive of operating expenses and depreciation and amortization discussed
separately below). Total direct costs were $289.7 million in 2008, an increase of $36.5 million as
compared to $253.2 million in 2007. Total direct costs were 54.3% of revenue in 2008 as compared
to 52.1% in 2007, due mainly to lower margin cable television programming.
Operating Expenses. System operations expenses increased $3.8 million or 6.9%, to $57.9 million in
2008 as compared to $54.1 million in 2007. Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses
decreased $3.9 million or 6.9%, to $52.0 million in 2008 as compared to $55.9 million in 2007, due
to the expected synergies from our post-merger consolidation of certain duplicative general and
administrative expenses. Depreciation and amortization expenses were $112.5 million in 2008 as
compared to $107.8 million in 2007. Amortization of acquired intangibles, related to the
acquisitions of StayOnline and On Command, was $11.5 million in 2008 compared to $8.5 million in
2007. As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and amortization expenses were 21.1% in 2008
compared to 22.2% in 2007, while amortization of acquired intangibles was 2.2% of revenue in 2008
compared to 1.8% in the prior year.
Due to the erosion of the capital markets and the economy in general, we incurred a goodwill and
purchased intangibles impairment charge of $11.2 million in 2008, related to Advertising and Media
Services, and recorded a write down of $0.6 million related to On Command purchased intangibles.
See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
As a result of our post acquisition activities, we incurred restructuring costs of $3.2 million
during 2008. During 2007, we incurred restructuring costs of $11.2 million.
We implemented an expense reduction program in the fourth quarter of 2008, which included a
reduction in our general workforce and the closing of our Atlanta call center location. The
reduction in force resulted in a decrease in our employee base by approximately 20%. As a result
of the reduction in force and call center closure, we incurred approximately $1.9 million of
severance related restructuring costs in 2008. The closure of the Atlanta call center was
completed in the first quarter of 2009.
50
Table of Contents
Other operating income for 2008 included net proceeds from insurance related to business
interruption and property damage claims associated with Hurricane Katrina. Other operating income
for 2007 included recoveries related to early contract terminations.
Operating Loss. As a result of the factors described above, operating loss was $(5.1) million in
2008 as compared to $(4.2) million in the prior year.
Interest Expense. Interest expense was $42.6 million in 2008 versus $41.0 million in 2007. The
increase resulted from the change in weighted average long-term debt, which increased as a result
of the On Command acquisition, to $616.8 million at December 31, 2008 from $517.0 million at
December 31, 2007. The weighted average interest rate decreased to 6.90% for 2008 versus 7.92% for
2007.
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt. During 2008, as part of our debt reduction initiative, we
acquired, through a wholly-owned subsidiary as a permitted investment under our Credit Facility,
$2.9 million of outstanding debt at 50.0% of par value and recorded a gain on the extinguishment of
debt of $1.4 million.
Loss on Early Retirement of Debt. During 2008, we made additional payments of $27.5 million on our
term loan, and wrote off $0.4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs. During 2007, we incurred
a $22.2 million charge as a result of the early retirement of $200.0 million related to our 9.50%
Notes and $67.8 million of our Term B notes.
Other (Expense) Income. During 2008, we recorded a total of $0.9 million of other expense. We
recorded an investment loss of $0.6 million for an investment in an Internet service provider,
related to our 2007 acquisitions, and $0.3 million of other expense, net of interest income.
During 2007, we recorded a total of $1.5 million of other income, including interest income,
primarily related to the reversal of a tax provision.
Taxes. For 2008, we incurred state franchise taxes of $0.8 million. During 2007, we incurred
federal income, state franchise, and foreign taxes of $0.7 million and reversed a $1.4 million tax
provision. The reversal was made as the statute of limitations expired.
Net Loss. As a result of the factors described above, net loss was $(48.4) million for 2008
compared to $(65.2) million in the prior year.
51
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based
upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Our primary cost drivers are predetermined
rates, such as hotel commissions, license fees paid for major motion pictures and other content or
one-time fixed fees for independent films and television programming costs. However, the
preparation of financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions which affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions we believe to be reasonable based upon the available information. The critical
policies related to the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the
financial statements are further discussed within the Notes of the financial statements as follows:
Ø | Revenue Recognition footnote #2 | ||
Ø | Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets footnote #7 | ||
Ø | Restructuring footnote #15 |
Recent Accounting Developments
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Accounting Standard
Update (ASU) No. 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, which is now codified
under FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 605, Revenue Recognition. This ASU
establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable;
eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires arrangement consideration be allocated at
the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method; and
requires a vendor determine its best estimate of selling price in a manner consistent with that
used to determine the selling price of the deliverable on a standalone basis. The ASU also
significantly expands the required disclosures related to a vendors multiple-deliverable revenue
arrangements. FASB ASU No. 2009-13 is effective on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements
entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early
adoption permitted. We are evaluating the effect from the adoption of this ASU on our current and
future business models. Depending on how we sell and deliver future systems and services, this ASU
could have an effect on the timing of revenue recognition and our consolidated results of
operations or cash flows.
In October 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASU No. 2009-14, Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include
Software Elements, which is now codified under FASB ASC Topic 985, Software. This ASU changes
the accounting model for revenue arrangements which include both tangible products and software
elements, providing guidance on how to determine which software, if any, relating to the tangible
product would be excluded from the scope of the software revenue guidance. FASB ASU No. 2009-14 is
effective on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in
fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. We are evaluating
the effect from the adoption of this ASU on our current and future business models. Depending on
how we sell and deliver future systems and services, this ASU could have an effect on the timing of
revenue recognition and our consolidated results of operations or cash flows.
In January 2010, the FASB issued FASB ASU No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements, which is now codified under FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures. This ASU will require additional disclosures regarding transfers in and out of
Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy, as well as a reconciliation of activity in Level 3 on a
gross basis (rather than as one net number). The ASU also provides clarification on disclosures
about the level of disaggregation for each class of assets and liabilities and on disclosures about
the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring
fair value measurements. FASB ASU No. 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures requiring a reconciliation of
activity in Level 3. Those disclosures will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning
after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this ASU will not have a material effect on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
52
Table of Contents
Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to various market risks, including potential losses resulting from adverse changes
in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We do not enter into derivatives or other
financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Interest. At December 31, 2009, we had debt totaling $469.9 million, with a weighted average
interest rate as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
Carrying | Fair | Weighted Average | ||||||||||
Amount | Value | Interest Rate | ||||||||||
Bank Credit Facility: |
||||||||||||
Bank term loan |
$ | 467,998 | $ | 420,028 | 2.26 | % | ||||||
Capital leases |
1,948 | 1,948 | 6.79 | % | ||||||||
$ | 469,946 | $ | 421,976 | 2.28 | % | |||||||
The fair value of our long-term debt is estimated based on current interest rates for similar debt
of the same remaining maturities and quoted market prices, except for capital leases, which are
reported at carrying value. For our capital leases, the carrying value approximates the fair
value. In addition, the fair value of our long-term debt is strictly hypothetical and not
indicative of what we are required to pay under the terms of our debt instruments.
We have two interest rate swap agreements, with notional values of $312.5 million, at a fixed rate
of 5.09%, and $125.0 million, at a fixed rate of 4.97%, both of which expire in June 2011. Our
aggregate weighted average interest rate, which includes the term loan and lease interest rates and
the difference in the swaps fixed interest rate versus LIBOR, for the year ended December 31,
2009, was 7.15%, compared to 6.90% for the year ended December 31, 2008. After giving effect to
the interest rate swap arrangements, we had fixed rate debt of $439.4 million and variable rate
debt of $30.5 million at December 31, 2009. For fixed rate debt, interest rate fluctuations affect
the fair market value but do not impact earnings or cash flows, if effective. Conversely, for
variable rate debt, interest rate fluctuations generally do not affect the fair market value but do
impact future earnings and cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant. The impact on
earnings and cash flow for the next year resulting from a one percentage point increase to interest
rates would be approximately $305,000, assuming other variables remain constant.
Economic Condition. Our results are closely connected to the performance of the lodging industry,
where occupancy rates may fluctuate resulting from various factors. Reduction in hotel occupancy
resulting from business, general economic, or other events, such as a recession in the United
States, significant international crises, acts of terrorism, war or public health issues, could
adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. The overall travel
industry can be, and has been in the past, adversely affected by weaker general economic climates,
geopolitical instability and concerns about public health.
Foreign Currency Transactions. A portion of our revenue is derived from the sale of Guest
Entertainment services in Canada and Mexico. The results of operations and financial position of
our operations in Canada and Mexico are measured in their local currencies and translated into U.S.
dollars. The effects of foreign currency fluctuations in Canada and Mexico are somewhat mitigated
by the fact expenses and liabilities are generally incurred in the local currency. The reported
income of our Canadian and Mexican subsidiaries will be higher or lower depending on a weakening or
strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the local currency. Additionally, a portion of our assets
are based in Canada and Mexico and are translated into U.S. dollars at foreign currency exchange
rates in effect as of the end of each period. Accordingly, our consolidated assets will fluctuate
depending on the weakening or strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the local currency.
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
See Item 15 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules for LodgeNets Consolidated Financial
Statements, the Notes thereto and Schedules filed as a part of this report.
53
Table of Contents
Item 9 Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Based on their evaluation as of the end of the
period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer have concluded the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective to ensure information required to
be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and
Exchange Commission rules and forms. Additionally, our disclosure controls and procedures were
also effective in ensuring information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Managements report on internal control over financial reporting. Our management is responsible
for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial
reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures which (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets; (ii)
provide reasonable assurance transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and our receipts
and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and
directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets which could have a material effect on
the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management has assessed our internal control over financial reporting in relation to criteria
described in Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, using those criteria, we
concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, our internal control over financial reporting was
effective.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, as stated in their
report appearing on page F-2 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There was no change in our internal control
over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2009 which has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B Other Information
None.
54
Table of Contents
PART III
Item 10 Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information concerning our directors and executive officers is incorporated by reference from
the sections entitled Executive Officers, Election of Directors Board of Directors and
Nominees and Compliance with Reporting Requirements of Section 16 of the Exchange Act of our
definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of
the last fiscal year.
Information concerning Audit Committee membership and the Audit Committees designated financial
expert is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled Election of Directors Corporate
Governance and Committees of the Board of DirectorsCommittees and Audit Committee Report of
our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end
of the last fiscal year.
We have adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics, which applies to all employees,
including the principal executive officer, principal financial officer and accounting officer,
controller or persons performing similar functions and all members of the Board of Directors. The
policies are found on our web site, which is http://www.lodgenet.com.
The charters of our Audit Committee, Governance and Nominating Committee, and Compensation
Committee may also be found on our website.
Item 11 Executive Compensation
Information concerning executive remuneration and transactions is incorporated by reference from
the sections entitled Election of Directors Director Compensation, Election of Directors
Executive Compensation, Report of the Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation and
Performance Graph of our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within
120 days after the end of the last fiscal year.
Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Information concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is
incorporated by reference from the section entitled About the Annual Meeting Who are the
largest owners of LodgeNets stock and how much stock do our directors and executive officers own?
of our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the
end of the last fiscal year. Information concerning securities authorized for issuance under
equity compensation plans is incorporated by reference from the section entitled Equity
Compensation Plan Information of our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation
14A within 120 days after the end of the last fiscal year. We do not know of any arrangement which
could, at a subsequent date, result in a change of control.
Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Information concerning certain relationships and related transactions with management is
incorporated by reference from the section entitled Certain Transactions with Management and
Others of our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days
after the end of the fiscal year.
Item 14 Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information concerning principal accountant fees and services is incorporated by reference from
the section entitled Audit Committee Report of our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed
pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the last fiscal year.
55
Table of Contents
PART IV
Item 15 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules Reference is made to the Index to
Consolidated Financial Statements of LodgeNet Interactive Corporation, located at page F 1 of
this PART IV, for a list of the financial statements and schedules for the year ended December 31,
2009, included herein.
Exhibits Following is a list of Exhibits filed with this report. Exhibits 10.17 through
10.23 constitute management contracts. Exhibits 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, 10.7, 10.8, 10.9, 10.10, and
10.11 constitute compensatory plans.
If you would like a copy of any of the Exhibits listed herein, please submit a written request to
LodgeNet Interactive Corporation, Attention: Corporate Secretary, 3900 West Innovation Street,
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57107-7002, telephone (605) 988-1000, and we will provide you with such
Exhibit(s) upon the payment of a nominal fee, such fee being limited to the expenses incurred by us
in providing you with the requested Exhibit(s).
Exhibit No. | ||
3.1
|
Certificate of Incorporation of LodgeNet (1) | |
3.2
|
Restated By-Laws of the Registrant (2) | |
3.3
|
Amendment No. 1 to Restated Certificate of Incorporation of LodgeNet (3) | |
3.4
|
Certificate of Ownership and Merger merging LodgeNet Interactive Corporation into LodgeNet Entertainment Corporation (4) | |
4.1
|
Rights Agreement dated as of February 28, 2008 between LodgeNet Interactive Corporation and Computershare Investor Services, LLC (5) | |
4.2
|
Certificate of Designations for 10% Series B Cumulative Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock (6) | |
10.1
|
LodgeNet Interactive Corporation Stock Option Plan (as amended and restated effective May 9, 2001) (7) | |
10.2
|
1993 Plan Form of Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee Directors (8) | |
10.3
|
1993 Plan Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for Key Employees (8) | |
10.4
|
Master Services Agreement between Hilton Worldwide and LodgeNet Interactive Corporation dated October 9, 2000 (9) | |
10.5
|
Amendment To Master Services Agreement dated August 2, 2002 by and between Hilton Worldwide and LodgeNet Interactive Corporation (10) | |
10.6
|
Hilton LodgeNet Agreement dated August 2, 2002 by and between Hilton Worldwide and LodgeNet Interactive Corporation (11) | |
10.7
|
LodgeNet Interactive Corporation 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (12) | |
10.8
|
2003 Plan Form of Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee Directors (13) | |
10.9
|
2003 Plan Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for Key Employees (14) | |
10.10
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Time-Based Vesting (15) |
56
Table of Contents
Exhibit No. | ||
10.11
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Performance-Based Vesting (16) | |
10.16
|
$675,000,000 Credit Agreement dated as of April 4, 2007 among LodgeNet Entertainment Corporation, as Borrower, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC as Syndication Agent, U.S. Bank National Association as Documentation Agent, and Bear Stearns Corporate Lending Inc. as Administrative Agent (17) | |
10.17
|
Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of January 29, 2008 between LodgeNet Interactive Corporation and Scott C. Petersen (18) | |
10.18
|
Executive Employment Agreement dated as of January 29, 2008 between LodgeNet Interactive Corporation and David M. Bankers (19) | |
10.19
|
Executive Employment Agreement dated as of January 29, 2008 between LodgeNet Interactive Corporation and James G. Naro (20) | |
10.20
|
Executive Employment Agreement dated as of January 29, 2008 between LodgeNet Interactive Corporation and Steven R. Pofahl (21) | |
10.21
|
Executive Employment Agreement dated as of January 29, 2008 between LodgeNet Interactive Corporation and Gary H. Ritondaro (22) | |
10.22
|
Executive Employment Agreement dated as of February 4, 2008 between LodgeNet Interactive Corporation and Derek S. White (23) | |
10.23
|
Executive Employment Agreement dated as of August 27, 2008 between LodgeNet Interactive Corporation and Scott E. Young (24) | |
12.1
|
Statement Regarding Computation of Ratios | |
21.1
|
Subsidiaries of the Company | |
23.1
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
31.1
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of Chief Financial Officer | |
31.2
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of Chief Executive Officer | |
32.1
|
Section 1350 Certifications |
| Confidential Treatment has been requested with respect to certain portions of this agreement. | |
(1) | Incorporated by Reference to LodgeNets Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, September 24, 1993. (File No. 033-67676). | |
(2) | Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 3.2 to LodgeNets Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 17, 2008. | |
(3) | Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.37 to LodgeNets Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001. | |
(4) | Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 3.1 to LodgeNets Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 15, 2008. |
57
Table of Contents
(5) | Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 4.6 to LodgeNets Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2008. | |
(6) | Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 3.1 to LodgeNets Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2009. | |
(7) | Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 99.1 to LodgeNets Registration Statement on Form S-8 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2002. | |
(8) | Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.13 and 10.14 to LodgeNets Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993. | |
(9) | Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.32 to LodgeNets Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000. | |
(10) | Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.2 to LodgeNets Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 15, 2002. | |
(11) | Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.1 to LodgeNets Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 15, 2002. | |
(12) | Incorporated by Reference to Annex 2 of LodgeNets Definitive Proxy Statement dated March 30, 2006. | |
(13) | Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.26 to LodgeNets Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. | |
(14) | Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.27 to LodgeNets Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. | |
(15) | Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.25 to LodgeNets Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. | |
(16) | Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.26 to LodgeNets Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. | |
(17) | Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.1 to LodgeNets Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 4, 2007. | |
(18) | Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.17 to LodgeNets Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. | |
(19) | Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.18 to LodgeNets Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. | |
(20) | Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.19 to LodgeNets Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. | |
(21) | Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.20 to LodgeNets Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. | |
(22) | Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.21 to LodgeNets Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. | |
(23) | Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.22 to LodgeNets Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. | |
(24) | Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.1 to LodgeNets Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 2, 2008. |
58
Table of Contents
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
LodgeNet has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized in the City of Sioux Falls, State of South Dakota, on March 12, 2010.
LodgeNet Interactive Corporation |
||||
By: | /s/ Scott C. Petersen | |||
Scott C. Petersen, | ||||
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors | ||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, LodgeNet has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, and in the capacities indicated, on March 12,
2010.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ Scott C. Petersen
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors | March 12, 2010 | ||
Scott C. Petersen
|
(Principal Executive Officer) | |||
/s/ Gary H. Ritondaro
|
Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer |
March 12, 2010 | ||
Gary H. Ritondaro
|
(Principal Financial & Accounting Officer) | |||
/s/ Martin L. Abbott
|
Director | March 12, 2010 | ||
Martin L. Abbott |
||||
/s/ R. Douglas Bradbury
|
Director | March 12, 2010 | ||
R. Douglas Bradbury |
||||
/s/ John E. Haire
|
Director | March 12, 2010 | ||
John E. Haire |
||||
/s/ J. Scott Kirby
|
Director | March 12, 2010 | ||
J. Scott Kirby |
||||
/s/ R. F. Leyendecker
|
Director | March 12, 2010 | ||
R. F. Leyendecker |
||||
/s/ Vikki I. Pachera
|
Director | March 12, 2010 | ||
Vikki I. Pachera |
||||
/s/ Scott H. Shlecter
|
Director | March 12, 2010 | ||
Scott H. Shlecter |
59
Table of Contents
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
LodgeNet Interactive Corporation and Subsidiaries
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Page | ||
F 2 | ||
F 3 | ||
F 4 | ||
F 5 | ||
F 6 | ||
F 7 | ||
Index to Financial Schedules |
||
F 34 |
F - 1
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
LodgeNet Interactive Corporation
LodgeNet Interactive Corporation
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated
statements of operations, of stockholders equity and of cash flows present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of LodgeNet Interactive Corporation and its subsidiaries at
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the
financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index presents fairly, in all materials
respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated
financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible for these
financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control
over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, which is stated in Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting within the 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders. Our responsibility is to express opinions
on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Companys internal
control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the
financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our
audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed
risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that
(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect
the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance
that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the
company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material
effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 12, 2010
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 12, 2010
F - 2
Table of Contents
LodgeNet
Interactive Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash |
$ | 17,011 | $ | 10,800 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net |
51,706 | 63,620 | ||||||
Other current assets |
9,189 | 9,107 | ||||||
Total current assets |
77,906 | 83,527 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
206,663 | 273,830 | ||||||
Debt issuance costs, net |
6,005 | 9,117 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
106,041 | 115,134 | ||||||
Goodwill |
100,081 | 100,081 | ||||||
Other assets |
11,658 | 8,097 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 508,354 | $ | 589,786 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Deficiency |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 40,040 | $ | 44,291 | ||||
Other current liability |
| 1,446 | ||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
6,101 | 7,597 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
19,137 | 23,870 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
17,531 | 17,168 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
82,809 | 94,372 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
463,845 | 580,923 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
32,687 | 43,239 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
579,341 | 718,534 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders deficiency: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized;
Series B cumulative perpetual convertible, 10%, 57,500 issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2009 (liquidation preference of $1,000 per
share or $57,500,000 total); none issued or outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
1 | | ||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized;
22,537,664 and 22,664,164 shares outstanding at December 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively |
225 | 227 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost: 0 and 180,000 shares at December 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively |
| (2,825 | ) | |||||
Additional paid-in capital |
379,223 | 329,740 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(426,211 | ) | (416,056 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(24,225 | ) | (39,834 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders deficiency |
(70,987 | ) | (128,748 | ) | ||||
Total liabilities and stockholders deficiency |
$ | 508,354 | $ | 589,786 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F - 3
Table of Contents
LodgeNet
Interactive Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||
Hospitality |
$ | 469,743 | $ | 519,922 | $ | 474,473 | ||||||
Other |
14,749 | 13,957 | 11,115 | |||||||||
Total revenues |
484,492 | 533,879 | 485,588 | |||||||||
Direct costs and operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
Direct costs (exclusive of operating expenses and
depreciation and amortization shown separately below): |
||||||||||||
Hospitality |
264,081 | 278,776 | 245,609 | |||||||||
Other |
10,790 | 10,924 | 7,554 | |||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
System operations |
42,605 | 57,853 | 54,114 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
44,538 | 52,042 | 55,878 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
100,309 | 124,060 | 116,378 | |||||||||
Goodwill impairment charge |
| 11,212 | | |||||||||
Restructuring charge |
603 | 5,047 | 11,158 | |||||||||
Other operating income |
(126 | ) | (964 | ) | (867 | ) | ||||||
Total direct costs and operating expenses |
462,800 | 538,950 | 489,824 | |||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
21,692 | (5,071 | ) | (4,236 | ) | |||||||
Other income and (expenses): |
||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(38,092 | ) | (42,551 | ) | (40,950 | ) | ||||||
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
9,292 | 1,446 | | |||||||||
Loss on early retirement of debt |
(1,537 | ) | (448 | ) | (22,195 | ) | ||||||
Other (expense) income |
(747 | ) | (945 | ) | 1,526 | |||||||
Loss before income taxes |
(9,392 | ) | (47,569 | ) | (65,855 | ) | ||||||
(Provision) benefit for income taxes |
(763 | ) | (849 | ) | 683 | |||||||
Net loss |
(10,155 | ) | (48,418 | ) | (65,172 | ) | ||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(3,114 | ) | | | ||||||||
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
$ | (13,269 | ) | $ | (48,418 | ) | $ | (65,172 | ) | |||
Net loss per common share (basic and diluted) |
$ | (0.59 | ) | $ | (2.16 | ) | $ | (3.00 | ) | |||
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic and diluted) |
22,439,325 | 22,372,475 | 21,758,066 | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F - 4
Table of Contents
LodgeNet
Interactive Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Deficiency and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock | Common Stock | Treasury Stock | Paid-in | Accumulated | Comprehensive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | (Loss)/Income | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2006 |
| $ | | 19,084,734 | $ | 191 | | $ | | $ | 242,383 | $ | (302,466 | ) | $ | 1,770 | $ | (58,122 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock option exercises |
| | 818,454 | 8 | | | 12,949 | | | 12,957 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issuance |
| | 3,050,000 | 31 | | | 73,382 | | | 73,413 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
| | | | 60,000 | (1,075 | ) | | | | (1,075 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation |
| | | | | | 506 | | | 506 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock |
| | 16,587 | | | | 1,185 | | | 1,185 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | | | (65,172 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
| | | | | | | | 4,963 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on
interest rate swap agreements |
| | | | | | | | (16,897 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss |
| | | | | | | | | (77,106 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
| $ | | 22,969,775 | $ | 230 | 60,000 | $ | (1,075 | ) | $ | 330,405 | $ | (367,638 | ) | $ | (10,164 | ) | $ | (48,242 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Common stock option exercises |
| | 100 | | | | 1 | | | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
| | | | 470,000 | (4,662 | ) | | | | (4,662 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement of treasury stock |
| | (350,000 | ) | (3 | ) | (350,000 | ) | 2,912 | (2,909 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation |
| | | | | | 1,185 | | | 1,185 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock |
| | 44,289 | | | | 1,090 | | | 1,090 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| | | | | | (32 | ) | | | (32 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | | | (48,418 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
| | | | | | | | (6,196 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on
interest rate swap agreements |
| | | | | | | | (23,474 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss |
| | | | | | | | | (78,088 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
| $ | | 22,664,164 | $ | 227 | 180,000 | $ | (2,825 | ) | $ | 329,740 | $ | (416,056 | ) | $ | (39,834 | ) | $ | (128,748 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Common stock option exercises |
| | 3,000 | | | | 1 | | | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement of treasury stock |
| | (180,000 | ) | (2 | ) | (180,000 | ) | 2,825 | (2,823 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock issuance |
57,500 | 1 | | | | | 53,695 | | | 53,696 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
| | | | | | (3,114 | ) | | | (3,114 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation |
| | | | | | 1,057 | | | 1,057 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock |
| | 50,500 | | | | 667 | | | 667 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | | | (10,155 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
| | | | | | | | 1,861 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on
interest rate swap agreements |
| | | | | | | | 13,748 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
| | | | | | | | | 5,454 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
57,500 | $ | 1 | 22,537,664 | $ | 225 | | $ | | $ | 379,223 | $ | (426,211 | ) | $ | (24,225 | ) | $ | (70,987 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F - 5
Table of Contents
LodgeNet
Interactive Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (10,155 | ) | $ | (48,418 | ) | $ | (65,172 | ) | |||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
100,309 | 124,060 | 116,378 | |||||||||
Gain on extinguishment of debt (non-cash) |
(9,292 | ) | (1,446 | ) | | |||||||
Goodwill impairment charge |
| 11,212 | | |||||||||
Loss on early retirement of debt |
1,537 | 448 | 3,583 | |||||||||
Share-based compensation and restricted stock |
1,724 | 2,275 | 1,737 | |||||||||
Gain due to insurance proceeds |
| (815 | ) | | ||||||||
Insurance proceeds related to business interruption |
| 815 | | |||||||||
Other, net |
588 | 576 | 188 | |||||||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
12,385 | 9,030 | (7,861 | ) | ||||||||
Other current assets |
1,173 | 2,030 | (2,496 | ) | ||||||||
Accounts payable |
(5,713 | ) | (5,454 | ) | 6,052 | |||||||
Accrued expenses and deferred revenue |
(4,981 | ) | (5,720 | ) | 8,332 | |||||||
Other |
(1,403 | ) | 1,260 | (1,872 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
86,172 | 89,853 | 58,869 | |||||||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Property and equipment additions |
(21,341 | ) | (64,407 | ) | (79,097 | ) | ||||||
Acquisition of StayOnline, Inc. |
| | (14,311 | ) | ||||||||
Acquisition of THN (20% minority interest) |
| | (5,000 | ) | ||||||||
Acquisition of On Command Corporation, net of cash
acquired |
| | (335,517 | ) | ||||||||
Other investing activities |
| | 651 | |||||||||
Net cash used for investing activities |
(21,341 | ) | (64,407 | ) | (433,274 | ) | ||||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt |
| | 625,000 | |||||||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
(91,109 | ) | (33,760 | ) | (271,241 | ) | ||||||
Payment of capital lease obligations |
(1,437 | ) | (1,365 | ) | (1,712 | ) | ||||||
Borrowings on revolving credit facility |
| 30,000 | | |||||||||
Repayments of revolving credit facility |
| (30,000 | ) | | ||||||||
Debt issuance costs |
| | (12,738 | ) | ||||||||
Purchase of long-term debt |
(23,685 | ) | | | ||||||||
Proceeds from investment in long-term debt |
5,410 | | | |||||||||
Contribution from minority interest holder to subsidiary |
| | 300 | |||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
| (4,662 | ) | (1,075 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of offering
costs |
| | 23,290 | |||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net of
offering costs |
53,696 | | | |||||||||
Payment of dividends to preferred shareholders |
(1,677 | ) | | | ||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
2 | | 17,120 | |||||||||
Change in other long-term liability |
| | (2,225 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities |
(58,800 | ) | (39,787 | ) | 376,719 | |||||||
Effect of exchange rates on cash |
180 | (428 | ) | 460 | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash |
6,211 | (14,769 | ) | 2,774 | ||||||||
Cash at beginning of period |
10,800 | 25,569 | 22,795 | |||||||||
Cash at end of period |
$ | 17,011 | $ | 10,800 | $ | 25,569 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F - 6
Table of Contents
LodgeNet
Interactive Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 The Company
We are the largest provider of interactive media and connectivity solutions to the hospitality
industry in the United States, Canada and Mexico. We also provide interactive television solutions
in select international markets, primarily through local or regional licensees. As of December 31,
2009, we provided interactive media and connectivity solutions to approximately 1.9 million hotel
rooms. In addition, we sell and maintain interactive television systems which provide on-demand
patient education, information and entertainment to healthcare facilities throughout the United
States. As of December 31, 2009, our system was installed in 45 healthcare facilities,
representing approximately 9,200 beds.
Our operating performance and outlook are strongly influenced by such factors as hotel occupancy
levels, general economic conditions in the lodging industry, the number of hotel rooms equipped
with our interactive systems, hotel guest demographics, the number and type of product offerings,
the popularity and availability of programming, and competitive factors, as well as the effect of
general economic conditions on consumer spending practices.
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Revenue Recognition We recognize revenue from various sources as follows:
Ø | Guest Entertainment Services. Our primary source of revenue is from providing in-room, interactive television services to the lodging industry, which the hotel guest typically purchases on a per-view, hourly or daily basis. These services include on-demand movies, on-demand games, music and music videos, Internet on television and television on-demand. We recognize revenue from the sale of these guest entertainment services in the period in which such services are sold to the hotel guest and when collection is reasonably assured. Persuasive evidence of a purchase exists through a guest buy transaction recorded on our system. No future performance obligations exist with respect to these types of services once they have been provided to the hotel guest. The prices related to our products or services are fixed or determinable prior to delivery of the products or services. | ||
Ø | Television Programming Services. We generate revenue from the sale of basic and premium television programming to individual hotels. In contrast to Guest Entertainment services, where the hotel guest is charged directly for the service, we charge the hotel for our television programming services. We recognize revenue from the sale of television programming services in the period in which such services are sold and when collection is reasonably assured. We establish the prices charged to each hotel and no future performance obligations exist on programming which has been provided to the hotel. Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists through our long-term contract with each hotel. We also have advance billings from one month to three months for certain basic and premium programming services where the revenue is deferred and recognized in the periods which services are provided. | ||
Ø | Broadband Service and Support. We provide ongoing maintenance, service and call center support services to hotel properties installed by us and also to hotel properties installed by other providers. In addition, we provide, in some cases, the hotel property with the portal to access the Internet. We receive monthly service fees from such hotel properties for our maintenance services and Internet access. We recognize the service fee ratably over the term of the contract. The prices for these services are fixed and determinable prior to delivery of the service. The fair value of these services is known due to objective and reliable evidence from contracts and stand-alone sales. Under the service agreement, which includes maintenance and Internet access, we recognize revenue ratably over the term of the maintenance and service contract, typically three years. |
F - 7
Table of Contents
Ø | Broadband System Sales. We provide broadband through the sale and installation of equipment. Revenue from the sale and installation of this equipment is recognized when the equipment is installed. The delivery and installation of the equipment are concurrent. In addition, this equipment, which can be acquired from other manufacturers or retailers, has stand-alone value to the customer. The software used within these systems can also be supplied by other vendors unrelated to us. Equipment prices are fixed and determinable prior to delivery and are based on objective and reliable sales evidence from a stand-alone basis. | ||
Ø | Hotel System Sales and Support. We also market and sell our guest entertainment interactive systems to hotels, along with recurring support for interactive content, software maintenance and technical field service, for a fixed fee. Revenue from the sale and installation of the interactive system, including the operating software, is deferred and recognized over the term of the contract, generally five years, due to inseparable proprietary software elements. The multiple elements are not separable because the proprietary software is required to operate the system and we do not license or sell the software separately under this business model. The interactive system prices are fixed and determinable prior to delivery. Revenue from this arrangement, which includes equipment, operating software, interactive content and maintenance services, is recognized ratably over the term of the related contract. | ||
Ø | Other Television Programming Systems and Equipment Sales and Services. We generate revenues from the sale and installation of television programming systems (i.e. DIRECTV satellite systems); from the installation of master antenna (MATV) equipment, including wiring, at the hotel; and from the sale of miscellaneous system equipment or services, such as in-room terminals, television remotes or other media devices, along with service parts and labor. Prices for the equipment or services are fixed and determinable prior to delivery. The equipment is not proprietary and can be supplied by other vendors. These sales are not made under multiple element arrangements and we recognize the revenue when the equipment is delivered or service (repair or installation) has been performed. No future performance obligation exists on an equipment sale or on a repair service which has been provided. | ||
Ø | Healthcare System Sales and Support. We provide our interactive television infrastructure and content to the healthcare industry. We generate revenue from two sources: 1) the sale and installation of system equipment and 2) support agreements with the facility to provide software maintenance, programming and system maintenance for one year. Historically, revenue from the sale and installation of our interactive system was recognized ratably over the one-year maintenance period after the equipment is installed. The contracted system hardware, installation and maintenance elements were not separable during this start-up phase due to insufficient vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value. The package price of the interactive system and related maintenance is fixed and determinable prior to delivery. Upon completion of the initial year, the support arrangement, which includes interactive content, software maintenance and system services, is renewable and is recognized ratably over the term of the related contract. The hospital is under no obligation to contract with us for the support arrangement. They may contract with other providers and utilize the equipment and software installed by us. In the fourth quarter of 2007, we attained 100% renewal activity for maintenance services, therefore establishing VSOE of the fair value of maintenance services. Effective in the fourth quarter of 2007, the entire selling price of the interactive system is recognized upon installation using the residual method. | ||
Ø | Advertising and Media Services. We generate revenue from the sale of advertising-based media services within our hospitality media and connectivity businesses through our wholly-owned subsidiary, The Hotel Networks, and server based channels within our interactive room base. The Hotel Networks delivers targeted advertising to hotel rooms on 10 satellite-delivered channels, known as the SuperBlock, which include MSNBC, CNBC, FOX News and The Weather Channel. In addition to the satellite platform, we generate revenue from server based channels and other interactive and location-based applications which can be delivered by our interactive television platform. Advertising revenue is recognized, net of agency commissions, when advertisements are broadcast or ratably over a contracted advertising period and when collection is reasonably assured. We establish the prices charged to each advertiser and no future performance obligations exist on advertising which has been broadcast. Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists through our contracts with each advertiser. |
F - 8
Table of Contents
Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
LodgeNet Interactive Corporation and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Foreign Currency Translation The assets and liabilities of our Canadian and Mexican subsidiaries
were translated at year-end exchange rates. Statement of operations items were translated at
average exchange rates during the periods. The translation adjustments are reported as a component
of other comprehensive income. The gains or losses on the intercompany accounts between LodgeNet
and its foreign subsidiaries, resulting from transactions occurring in foreign currencies, are
included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The gains or losses on intercompany
accounts of a long-term investment nature are reported as a component of other comprehensive
income.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and
assumptions which affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts
of revenues, expenses and costs during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Long-Lived Assets We review the carrying value of long-lived assets, such as property and
equipment and intangible assets, whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying value of an
asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use
and eventual disposition. In cases where undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the
carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized to reduce the carrying value of the asset to its
estimated fair value.
Property and Equipment Our property and equipment is stated at cost, net of accumulated
depreciation and amortization. Installed Guest Entertainment and free-to-guest systems consist of
equipment and related costs of installation, including certain payroll costs, sales commissions and
customer acquisition costs. Maintenance costs, which do not significantly extend the useful lives
of the respective assets, and repair costs are charged to Guest Entertainment operations as
incurred. We begin depreciating Guest Entertainment and free-to-guest systems when such systems
are installed and activated. Depreciation of other equipment begins when such equipment is placed
in service. We attribute no salvage value to equipment, and depreciation and amortization are
computed using the straight-line method over the following useful lives:
Years | ||||
Buildings |
30 | |||
Hotel systems: |
||||
Installed system costs |
2 7 | |||
Customer acquisition costs |
4 7 | |||
System components |
5 7 | |||
Software costs |
1 1/2 5 | |||
Other equipment |
3 10 |
Allowance for System Removal We de-install properties through the course of normal operations due
to a number of factors, including: poor revenue performance, hotel bankruptcy or collection issues,
hotel closings and change in service provider. We regularly evaluate our backlog of properties
scheduled for de-installation and record a provision for estimated system removal costs. The costs
incurred as a result of de-installation include the labor to de-install the system, as well as
unamortized installation costs. Over the last five years, de-installation activity averaged
approximately 3% of our installed room base.
Allowance for Excess or Obsolete System Components We regularly evaluate component levels to
ascertain build requirements based on our backlog and service requirements based on our current
installed base. When a certain system component becomes obsolete due to technological changes and
it is determined the component cannot be utilized within our current installed base, we record a
provision through depreciation for excess and obsolete components based on estimated forecasts of
product demand and service requirements. Additionally, we have components held primarily for
resale, and if the component is not an active item for our assembly or service inventory, we record
a provision through cost of sales related to that product. We make every effort to ensure the
accuracy of our forecasts of service requirements and future production; however, any significant
unanticipated
changes in demand or technological advances could have an impact on the value of system components
and reported operating results.
F - 9
Table of Contents
Goodwill Impairment We account for goodwill and other intangible assets under FASB ASC Topic 350,
Intangibles Goodwill and Other. Under FASB ASC Topic 350, purchased goodwill is not amortized;
rather, it is tested for impairment at least annually. We perform our goodwill impairment test for
each reporting unit annually during the fourth quarter. Impairment testing could occur more
frequently if there is a triggering event or change in circumstances which indicate the carrying
value may not be recoverable, such as a significant deterioration in market conditions. We did not
encounter such triggering events during 2009.
We have three reporting units, Hospitality, Healthcare and Advertising, for which only the
Hospitality and Advertising units have goodwill. FASB ASC Topic 350 requires a two-step impairment
test for goodwill. The first step is to compare the carrying amount of the reporting units net
assets to the fair value of the reporting unit. We estimate fair value by utilizing a discounted
cash flow analysis based on key assumptions and estimates. We then reconcile the aggregate
reporting units fair values to our indicated market capitalization. Key assumptions used to
determine fair value include projections of revenue and cost data, capital spending, growth and
operating earnings, factored for the economic deterioration and expected timing of a recovery from
the business downturn. Certain costs within the reporting units are fixed in nature; therefore,
incremental revenue which exceeds the fixed cost threshold would significantly improve cash flow
and recoverability of goodwill.
If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value, no further evaluation is
required and no impairment loss is recognized. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, then
the second step must be completed, which involves allocating the fair value of the reporting unit
to each asset and liability, with the excess being implied goodwill. An impairment loss occurs if
the amount of the recorded goodwill exceeds the implied goodwill. We are required to record such
impairment losses as a component of income from continuing operations.
As of December 31, 2009, our Hospitality segments fair value was significantly in excess of its
carrying value. The fair value was $130.1 million versus our negative carrying value of $(70.1)
million. Our Advertising units fair value of $29.3 million also exceeded its negative carrying
value of $(0.9) million as of December 31, 2009.
The determination of fair value requires us to make significant estimates and assumptions. These
estimates may differ from actual results due to inherent uncertainty, such as deterioration in
market conditions, prohibiting expected revenue recovery levels. Due to the economic conditions,
the Advertising unit could again be adversely impacted by conditions affecting businesses which
normally could be expected to promote within the lodging space. Advertising revenue is closely
linked to the performance of products and services sold to business and leisure travelers. If
hotel occupancy rates continue to decline as a result of reduced travel, advertisers may be less
inclined to promote their products within the lodging space. A significant slow-down in economic
activities could adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows. Consequently, our goodwill may be impaired if the market conditions deteriorate or the
capital market erodes.
Intangible Assets In accordance with FASB ASC Topics 350, Intangibles Goodwill and Other, and
360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, we evaluate the remaining useful lives of our intangible
assets with finite lives, and review for impairment when triggering events occur or change in
circumstances warrant modifications to the carrying amount of the assets. These triggering events
or circumstances include a significant deterioration in market conditions. We periodically
evaluate the reasonableness of the useful lives of the intangible assets:
Years | ||||
Hotel contracts and relationships |
10 20 | |||
Tradenames |
7 | |||
Acquired technologies and patents |
5 | |||
Content agreements and relationships |
4 |
F - 10
Table of Contents
Software Developed for Internal Use We have capitalized certain costs of developing internal use
software for our Guest Entertainment systems in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 350, Intangibles
Goodwill and Other. This requires capitalization of qualifying costs incurred during the
softwares application development stage and to expense as incurred costs incurred during the
preliminary project and post implementation/operation stages. Capitalized costs are reported at
the lower of unamortized cost or net realizable value, and are amortized over the systems
estimated useful life, not to exceed five years. We capitalized internal system development costs
of $1.5 million, $2.5 million and $2.2 million during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively. Amortization of such costs was $3.7 million, $4.8 million and $3.8 million
during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Software Developed for Sale We have capitalized certain costs of developing software for sale for
our free-to-guest, Broadband and Healthcare systems in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 985,
Software. This requires capitalization of qualifying costs incurred after the establishment of
technological feasibility and to expense costs incurred prior to that point as research and
development. Capitalized costs are reported at the lower of unamortized cost or net realizable
value, and are amortized to direct costs based on current and future revenue, with an annual
minimum equal to the straight-line amortization over the remaining estimated economic life. We
capitalized system development for sale costs of approximately $893,000, $840,000 and $0 during the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Amortization of such costs was
approximately $181,000, $0 and $0 during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Research and Development Costs Research and development costs related to our software development
activities are expensed as incurred. We charged research and development activities of $512,000,
$630,000 and $937,000 to operating expense during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Concentration of Credit Risks and Customer Data We derive most of our revenue from entities in
the lodging industry. During 2009, hotels owned, managed or franchised by Hilton Worldwide
(Hilton) and by Marriott International, Inc. (Marriott) represented approximately 18.8% and
17.8%, respectively, of our consolidated revenue. The Hilton owned properties account for less
than 6% of total properties operating under the Hilton brand within our room base. In 2000, we
signed a master services agreement with Hilton to install, on an exclusive basis, our interactive
television system in all Hilton owned properties and to be the exclusive recommended provider of
choice for its managed and franchised properties. In 2008, the Hilton master services agreement
was extended through December 31, 2009, and is currently on month-to-month terms as we negotiate a
new agreement with current management. We also have a master agreement with Marriott which allows
us to distribute our services to hotel rooms owned or managed by Marriott. In addition, we have
the opportunity to enter into agreements to provide our services to additional hotel rooms
franchised by Marriott. The master agreement with Marriott expires on the date when the last
contract that is entered into under the master agreement with a hotel owned or managed by Marriott
expires. The loss of any of these hotel chain customers, or the loss of a significant number of
other hotel chain customers, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations,
cash flows and financial condition. No other customers account for more than 10% of our total
revenue.
Significant Vendors We obtain most of our basic and premium television programming pursuant to
agreements with DIRECTV, with certain agreements having two year extension periods. We are not
obligated to have any minimum number of hotel rooms under the agreements, nor are we obligated to
make any minimum payments under the agreements. We pay only for the selected programming provided
to a hotel. The loss of this vendor could limit our ability to provide such programming to our
customers and impact our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts We determine the estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts
considering several factors, including historical experience, aging of the accounts receivable, bad
debt recoveries and contract terms between the hotel and us. In accordance with our hotel
contracts, monies collected by the hotel for interactive television services are held in trust on
our behalf. Collectability is reasonably assured as supported by our credit check process, nominal
write-off history and broad customer base. Our interactive hotel base is well diversified in terms
of (i) location; (ii) demographics; and (iii) customer contracts. If the financial condition of a
hotel chain or group of hotels were to deteriorate and reduce the ability to remit our monies, we
may be required to increase our allowance by recording additional bad debt expense. The allowance
for doubtful accounts was $652,000, $553,000 and $432,000 at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
F - 11
Table of Contents
Derivative Financial Instruments We follow FASB ASC Topic 815, Derivative and Hedging
Activities, which establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring every derivative
instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) be recorded in
the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. The statement
requires changes in the derivatives fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific
hedge accounting criteria are met. Accounting for qualifying hedges allows a derivatives gains
and losses to offset related results on the hedged item and requires we must formally document,
designate and assess the effectiveness of transactions receiving hedge accounting. See Note 10.
Income Taxes We account for income taxes under the liability method, in accordance with the
requirements of FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are
computed annually for differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and
liabilities. Measurement is based on enacted tax rates applicable to the periods in which such
differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce
deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted additional provisions now codified under FASB ASC Topic 740,
which clarified the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a companys financial
statements and prescribed a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return. In instances where a company has taken or expects to take a tax position in its tax
return, and the company believes it is more likely than not such tax position will be upheld by the
relevant taxing authority, the company may record a benefit for such tax position in its
consolidated financial statements.
Comprehensive Income (Loss) We follow FASB ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income, which requires
companies to report all changes in equity during a period, except those resulting from investments
by owners and distributions to owners, in a financial statement for the period in which they are
recognized. Total comprehensive income (loss) is disclosed in the Consolidated Statements of
Stockholders Deficiency and Comprehensive Income (Loss) and includes net income (loss) and other
comprehensive income (loss), which is comprised of unrealized gains (losses) on interest rate swap
agreements and foreign currency translation adjustments. Comprehensive income (loss) was as
follows for the years ended December 31 (dollar amounts in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (10,155 | ) | $ | (48,418 | ) | $ | (65,172 | ) | |||
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
1,861 | (6,196 | ) | 4,963 | ||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on
interest rate swap
agreements |
13,748 | (23,474 | ) | (16,897 | ) | |||||||
Comprehensive income
(loss) |
$ | 5,454 | $ | (78,088 | ) | $ | (77,106 | ) | ||||
Components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as shown on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
Unrealized | ||||||||||||
(Loss) Gain on | Foreign | Accumulated | ||||||||||
Interest Rate | Currency | Other | ||||||||||
Swap | Translation | Comprehensive | ||||||||||
Agreements | Adjustment | Loss | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31,
2006 |
$ | | $ | 1,770 | $ | 1,770 | ||||||
Change during period |
(16,897 | ) | 4,963 | (11,934 | ) | |||||||
Balance, December 31,
2007 |
(16,897 | ) | 6,733 | (10,164 | ) | |||||||
Change during period |
(23,474 | ) | (6,196 | ) | (29,670 | ) | ||||||
Balance, December 31,
2008 |
(40,371 | ) | 537 | (39,834 | ) | |||||||
Change during period |
13,748 | 1,861 | 15,609 | |||||||||
Balance, December 31,
2009 |
$ | (26,623 | ) | $ | 2,398 | $ | (24,225 | ) | ||||
F - 12
Table of Contents
Treasury Stock We account for treasury stock under the cost method and include it as a component
of stockholders deficiency within our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Accordingly, we include the
cash payment to acquire the treasury stock as a component of financing activities within our
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Effective in the fourth quarter of 2007, we began to
repurchase shares of common stock as treasury stock. A total of 530,000 shares were repurchased.
In March 2008, we retired 350,000 shares, with the remaining 180,000 shares retired in March 2009.
There is no treasury stock at December 31, 2009.
Earnings Per Share Computation We calculate earnings per share (EPS) in accordance with FASB ASC
Topic 260, Earnings Per Share (EPS), which requires the computation and disclosure of two EPS
amounts, basic and diluted. Basic EPS is computed based on the weighted average number of common
shares actually outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed based on the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding plus all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding
during the period. Potential common shares which have an anti-dilutive effect are excluded from
diluted earnings per share.
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted additional provisions of FASB ASC Topic 260, which provide
that unvested share-based payment awards which contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in
the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. We determined our
outstanding shares of non-vested restricted stock are participating securities. All earnings per
common share data for periods prior to January 1, 2009 have been retrospectively adjusted to
conform to the new computation method.
F - 13
Table of Contents
The following table reflects the calculation of weighted average basic and fully diluted shares for
the periods ended December 31. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, participating
securities were not included in the calculations of earnings per share, as we were in a loss
position and their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. For the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007, potential dilutive common shares, which include stock options, unvested restricted
stock and the conversion of preferred stock, were not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share, as we were in a loss position and their inclusion would have been
anti-dilutive. Dollar amounts are in thousands, except share data:
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Basic EPS: |
||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (10,155 | ) | $ | (48,418 | ) | $ | (65,172 | ) | |||
Preferred stock dividends |
(3,114 | ) | | | ||||||||
$ | (13,269 | ) | $ | (48,418 | ) | $ | (65,172 | ) | ||||
Loss allocated to participating securities |
| | | |||||||||
Net loss available to common stockholders |
$ | (13,269 | ) | $ | (48,418 | ) | $ | (65,172 | ) | |||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
22,439,325 | 22,372,475 | 21,758,066 | |||||||||
Less participating securities included in
weighted
average shares outstanding (1) |
N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic
earnings per common share |
22,439,325 | 22,372,475 | 21,758,066 | |||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | (0.59 | ) | $ | (2.16 | ) | $ | (3.00 | ) | |||
Diluted EPS: |
||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (10,155 | ) | $ | (48,418 | ) | $ | (65,172 | ) | |||
Preferred stock dividends |
(3,114 | ) | | | ||||||||
$ | (13,269 | ) | $ | (48,418 | ) | $ | (65,172 | ) | ||||
Loss allocated to participating securities |
| | | |||||||||
Net loss available to common stockholders |
$ | (13,269 | ) | $ | (48,418 | ) | $ | (65,172 | ) | |||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
22,439,325 | 22,372,475 | 21,758,066 | |||||||||
Less participating securities included in
weighted
average shares outstanding (1) |
N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic
earnings per common share |
22,439,325 | 22,372,475 | 21,758,066 | |||||||||
Dilutive effect of potential shares (2) |
N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted
earnings per common share |
22,439,325 | 22,372,475 | 21,758,066 | |||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | (0.59 | ) | $ | (2.16 | ) | $ | (3.00 | ) |
(1) | Participating securities were not included in the calculations of earnings per share, as we were in a loss position and their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. | |
(2) | Potential dilutive shares were not included in the calculations of earnings per share, as we were in a loss position and their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. This includes 17,029,401, 1,710,718 and 1,355,631 shares as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
F -14
Table of Contents
Share-based Compensation We account for our stock option and incentive plans under the
recognition and measurement provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation Stock Compensation,
which require the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based awards
based on estimated fair values, net of estimated forfeitures. We adopted the guidance now codified
under FASB ASC Topic 718, effective January 1, 2006, using the modified prospective transition
method. We have also applied the supplemental implementation guidance of SEC Staff Accounting
Bulletin (SAB) No. 110 in our adoption of these provisions. Share-based compensation expense
recognized in the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 includes: (a) compensation cost for
all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested, as of January 1, 2006 and (b)
compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the
grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of this Topic.
Statements of Cash Flows Cash is comprised of demand deposits. Cash paid for interest was $38.1
million, $42.4 million and $41.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Cash paid for taxes, primarily state franchise tax, was $929,000, $759,000 and
$500,000 during the years ended December, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Effect of Recently Issued Accounting Standards In October 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASU No.
2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, which is now codified under FASB ASC Topic
605, Revenue Recognition. This ASU establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the
selling price of a deliverable; eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires
arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables
using the relative selling price method; and requires a vendor determine its best estimate of
selling price in a manner consistent with that used to determine the selling price of the
deliverable on a standalone basis. The ASU also significantly expands the required disclosures
related to a vendors multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. FASB ASU No. 2009-13 is effective
on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years
beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. We are evaluating the effect
from the adoption of this ASU on our current and future business models. Depending on how we sell
and deliver future systems and services, this ASU could have an effect on the timing of revenue
recognition and our consolidated results of operations or cash flows.
In October 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASU No. 2009-14, Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include
Software Elements, which is now codified under FASB ASC Topic 985, Software. This ASU changes
the accounting model for revenue arrangements which include both tangible products and software
elements, providing guidance on how to determine which software, if any, relating to the tangible
product would be excluded from the scope of the software revenue guidance. FASB ASU No. 2009-14 is
effective on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in
fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. We are evaluating
the effect from the adoption of this ASU on our current and future business models. Depending on
how we sell and deliver future systems and services, this ASU could have an effect on the timing of
revenue recognition and our consolidated results of operations or cash flows.
In January 2010, the FASB issued FASB ASU No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements, which is now codified under FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures. This ASU will require additional disclosures regarding transfers in and out of
Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy, as well as a reconciliation of activity in Level 3 on a
gross basis (rather than as one net number). The ASU also provides clarification on disclosures
about the level of disaggregation for each class of assets and liabilities and on disclosures about
the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring
fair value measurements. FASB ASU No. 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures requiring a reconciliation of
activity in Level 3. Those disclosures will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning
after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this ASU will not have a material effect on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Note 3 Investments and Business Combinations
In February 2007, we, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, LodgeNet StayOnline, Inc., acquired
substantially all of the operating assets of StayOnline, Inc. (StayOnline), for approximately
$15.5 million in cash. Our financial statements have included the results of StayOnline since
February 1, 2007.
F - 15
Table of Contents
In April 2007, we completed the acquisition of Ascent Entertainment Group, Inc. (Ascent) for
approximately $387.9 million, including transaction costs. Ascent owned 100% of the capital stock
of On Command Corporation (On Command). On Command is now a subsidiary of LodgeNet and has been
included in our results of operations since April 4, 2007. Included in the acquisition was an
investment accounted for under the cost method of approximately $5.0 million in a high-speed
Internet service provider. As a result of the general economy and reduced profitability of the
provider, we recorded a $0.6 million write-down on the investment in 2008 and a $1.4 million
write-down in 2009 from our evaluation of fair value.
In July 2007, we acquired the 20% minority interest in Hotelevision, Inc. dba The Hotel Networks
(THN) for $5.0 million. We had acquired 80% ownership as part of the On Command acquisition on
April 4, 2007.
The following table presents LodgeNets unaudited pro forma condensed Statement of Operations,
inclusive of StayOnline and On Command, for the year ended December 31, 2007, as if the
acquisitions were completed as of January 1, 2007 (dollar amounts in thousands, except share data):
December 31, | ||||
2007 | ||||
Pro Forma | ||||
Total revenue |
$ | 547,707 | ||
Net loss |
$ | (77,062 | ) | |
Net loss per share |
$ | (3.42 | ) |
The unaudited pro forma results include adjustments for incremental interest expense and
amortization of acquired intangibles related to the acquisitions. The results are presented for
comparative purposes only and are not indicative of operating results which would have been
recorded if the acquisition had been consummated at the beginning of the period, nor is it
indicative of future operating results.
Note 4 Fair Value Measurements
We adopted the fair value measurement and disclosure provisions of FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures, relating to financial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2008 and
nonfinancial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2009. The fair value of an asset or liability is
the price that would be received to sell that asset or paid to transfer that liability in an
orderly transaction occurring in the principal market (or most advantageous market in the absence
of a principal market) for such asset or liability. FASB ASC Topic 820 includes a fair value
hierarchy, which is intended to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements
and related disclosures. The fair value hierarchy is based on inputs to valuation techniques,
which are used to measure fair value and which are either observable or unobservable. Observable
inputs reflect assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on
market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect a reporting
entitys pricing based upon their own market assumptions. The fair value hierarchy consists of the
following three levels:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. | ||
Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data. | ||
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. | ||
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities The estimated carrying and fair values of our financial instruments in the financial statements are as follows at December 31 (dollar amounts in thousands): |
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | |||||||||||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | |||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps
liability position |
$ | 26,623 | $ | 26,623 | $ | 40,371 | $ | 40,371 | ||||||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 469,946 | $ | 421,976 | $ | 588,520 | $ | 295,858 |
F -16
Table of Contents
The fair value of our long-term debt is estimated based on current interest rates for similar
debt of the same remaining maturities and quoted market prices, except for capital leases, which
are reported at carrying value. For our capital leases, the carrying value approximates the fair
value. The fair value of the interest rate swaps (used for purposes other than trading) is the
estimated amount we would have to pay to terminate the swap agreement at the reporting date.
The fair value of our long-term debt is strictly hypothetical and not indicative of what we are
required to pay under the terms of our debt instruments. The fair value of the swap agreements is
recognized in other long-term liabilities. Changes in fair value are recognized in other
comprehensive income (loss) if the hedge is effective. We plan to hold the swap agreements to
maturity.
The following table summarizes the valuation of our financial instruments by the fair value
hierarchy described above as of the valuation date listed (dollar amounts in thousands):
Quoted Prices | Significant | |||||||||||||||
in Active | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Total | Markets for | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||||||
Fair Value | Identical Asset | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
Measurement | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2008: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps liability position |
$ | 40,371 | $ | | $ | 40,371 | $ | | ||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps liability position |
$ | 26,623 | $ | | $ | 26,623 | $ | |
We estimated the fair value of the interest rate swaps based on mid-market data from a third party
provider. We periodically review and validate this data on an independent basis. The fair value
determination also included consideration of nonperformance risk, which did not have a material
impact on the fair value at December 31, 2009.
Nonfinancial Assets and Nonfinancial Liabilities Certain assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a non-recurring basis could include nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities
measured at fair value in the goodwill impairment tests and intangible assets and other
nonfinancial long-lived assets measured at fair value for impairment assessment.
Our cost method investment with a carrying amount of $4.4 million was written down to its Level 3
fair value of $3.0 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $1.4 million, which was included
in our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Note 5 Property and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment was comprised as follows at December 31 (dollar amounts in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Land, building and equipment |
$ | 111,777 | $ | 111,870 | ||||
Hotel systems: |
||||||||
Installed system costs |
630,651 | 636,986 | ||||||
Customer acquisition costs |
55,889 | 58,995 | ||||||
System components |
31,832 | 31,409 | ||||||
Software costs |
36,497 | 35,522 | ||||||
Total |
866,646 | 874,782 | ||||||
Less depreciation and amortization |
(659,983 | ) | (600,952 | ) | ||||
Property and equipment, net |
$ | 206,663 | $ | 273,830 | ||||
We recorded depreciation and amortization expense for property, plant and equipment of $89.5
million, $110.7 million and $105.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
F - 17
Table of Contents
Note 6 Debt Issuance Costs
Costs associated with the issuance of debt securities and with obtaining credit facilities are
capitalized and amortized over the term of the related borrowing or facility. We capitalized $12.7
million of debt issuance costs during the year ended December 31, 2007. No costs were capitalized
during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. Unamortized debt issuance costs of $1.5
million, $0.4 million and $5.3 million were written off in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively (see
Note 9). Amortization of the debt issuance costs was $1.6 million in 2009, $1.8 million in 2008
and $1.7 million in 2007. Debt issuance costs recorded in the balance sheets are as follows at
December 31 (dollar amounts in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Debt issuance costs |
$ | 10,754 | $ | 12,291 | ||||
Accumulated amortization |
(4,749 | ) | (3,174 | ) | ||||
$ | 6,005 | $ | 9,117 | |||||
Note 7 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We have three reporting units, Hospitality, Healthcare and Advertising, for which only the
Hospitality and Advertising units have goodwill.
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired. In 2007, we
recorded goodwill in connection with the acquisitions of StayOnline, On Command, and minority
interest of The Hotel Networks. The product lines of both StayOnline and On Command shared the
same operating and economic characteristics as our pre-acquisition product lines and were
integrated into the Hospitality operating segment. The Hospitality operating segment is one
reporting unit due to the fact its components are similar and share similar characteristics.
Our goodwill is not amortized; rather, it is tested for impairment at least annually. We perform
our goodwill impairment test for each reporting unit annually during the fourth quarter.
Additional impairment testing is not required for our finite life intangibles unless there is a
triggering event or change in circumstances which indicate the carrying value may not be
recoverable, such as a significant deterioration in market conditions.
In our 2008 test, we determined goodwill within our Advertising reporting unit was impaired,
resulting in a goodwill impairment charge of $11.2 million, which was recognized in the fourth
quarter of 2008. This charge reduced goodwill recorded in connection with acquisitions made in
2007 but did not impact our cash flow or debt covenants.
In our 2009 test, we determined there was no impairment. As of December 31, 2009, our Hospitality
segments fair value was significantly in excess of carrying value. The fair value was $130.1
million versus our negative carrying value of $(70.1) million. Our Advertising units fair value
of $29.3 million also exceeded its negative carrying value $(0.9) million as of December 31, 2009.
Key assumptions used to determine the reporting units fair values include projections of revenue
and cost data, capital spending, growth and operating earnings, factored for the economic
deterioration and expected timing of a recovery from the business downturn. Certain costs within
the reporting units are fixed in nature; therefore, incremental revenue which exceeds the fixed
cost threshold would significantly improve cash flow and recoverability of goodwill. The
Advertising unit could again be adversely impacted by conditions affecting businesses which
normally could be expected to promote within the lodging space and impairment may occur if those
market conditions deteriorate in future periods. Advertising revenue is closely linked to the
performance of products and services sold to business and leisure travelers. If hotel occupancy
rates continue to decline as a result of reduced travel, advertisers may be less inclined to
promote their products within the lodging space.
F - 18
Table of Contents
The carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008
and 2007 was as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
Hospitality | Other | Total | ||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2007 |
||||||||||||
Goodwill |
$ | 92,614 | $ | 18,679 | $ | 111,293 | ||||||
Accumulated impairment losses |
| | | |||||||||
92,614 | 18,679 | 111,293 | ||||||||||
Activity during the period impairment loss |
| (11,212 | ) | (11,212 | ) | |||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
||||||||||||
Goodwill |
92,614 | 18,679 | 111,293 | |||||||||
Accumulated impairment losses |
| (11,212 | ) | (11,212 | ) | |||||||
92,614 | 7,467 | 100,081 | ||||||||||
Activity during the period |
| | | |||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||||
Goodwill |
92,614 | 18,679 | 111,293 | |||||||||
Accumulated impairment losses |
| (11,212 | ) | (11,212 | ) | |||||||
$ | 92,614 | $ | 7,467 | $ | 100,081 | |||||||
We have intangible assets consisting of certain acquired technology, patents, trademarks, hotel
contracts, customer relationships, studio agreements and licensee fees. These intangible assets
have been deemed to have finite useful lives and are amortized over their current estimated useful
lives, ranging from three to twenty years. We review the intangible assets for impairment when
triggering events occur or change in circumstances, such as a significant deterioration in market
conditions, warrant modifications to the carrying amount of the assets.
In the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded a write-down of $0.6 million related to the On Command
studio programming agreements. The impairment charge was primarily driven by the erosion of the
general economy and capital markets and their impact on our Hospitality business.
We have the following intangible assets at December 31 (dollar amounts in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | Accumulated | |||||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Amount | Amortization | |||||||||||||
Assets subject to amortization: |
||||||||||||||||
Acquired contracts and
relationships |
$ | 120,315 | $ | (17,629 | ) | $ | 120,315 | $ | (11,274 | ) | ||||||
Other acquired intangibles |
12,884 | (12,130 | ) | 12,984 | (11,079 | ) | ||||||||||
Tradenames |
3,094 | (1,626 | ) | 3,042 | (1,079 | ) | ||||||||||
Acquired patents |
5,142 | (4,009 | ) | 5,100 | (2,875 | ) | ||||||||||
$ | 141,435 | $ | (35,394 | ) | $ | 141,441 | $ | (26,307 | ) | |||||||
We recorded consolidated amortization expense of $9.2 million, $11.6 million and $9.2 million,
respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007. We estimate total amortization
expense for the years ending December 31, as follows (dollar amounts in millions): 2010 $8.1;
2011 $7.1; 2012 $6.6; 2013 $6.4 and 2014 $6.3. Actual amounts may change from such
estimated amounts due to additional intangible asset acquisitions, potential impairment,
accelerated amortization or other events.
F - 19
Table of Contents
Note 8 Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses were comprised as follows at December 31 (dollar amounts in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Property, sales and other taxes |
$ | 6,933 | $ | 8,876 | ||||
Compensation |
4,360 | 7,406 | ||||||
Interest |
92 | 109 | ||||||
Programming related |
2,510 | 1,751 | ||||||
Restructuring and reorganization |
758 | 2,436 | ||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
1,438 | | ||||||
Other |
3,046 | 3,292 | ||||||
$ | 19,137 | $ | 23,870 | |||||
Note 9 Long-term Debt and Credit Facilities
Long-term debt was comprised as follows at December 31 (dollar amounts in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Bank Credit Facility: |
||||||||
Bank term loan |
$ | 467,998 | $ | 585,323 | ||||
Revolving credit facility |
| | ||||||
Capital leases |
1,948 | 3,197 | ||||||
469,946 | 588,520 | |||||||
Less current maturities |
(6,101 | ) | (7,597 | ) | ||||
$ | 463,845 | $ | 580,923 | |||||
Bank Credit Facility In April 2007, we entered into a $675.0 million bank Credit Facility,
comprised of a $625.0 million term loan, which matures in April 2014, and a $50.0 million revolving
Credit Facility, which matures in April 2013. The term loan originally required quarterly
repayments of $1,562,500, which began September 30, 2007. The required quarterly payments have
been adjusted for the reduction in principal as a result of our early repayments against the loan,
resulting in a quarterly payment requirement of $1,274,399. The term loan bears interest at our
option of (1) the banks base rate plus a margin of 1.00% or (2) LIBOR plus a margin of 2.00%. The
agreement provides that when our consolidated leverage ratio is below 3.25 times, the term loan
bears interest at our option of (1) the banks base rate plus a margin of 0.75% or (2) LIBOR plus a
margin of 1.75%. The term loan is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of the
Company. The Credit Facility includes terms and conditions which require compliance with the
leverage and interest coverage covenants. As of December 31, 2009, our consolidated leverage ratio
was 3.82 compared to the maximum allowable of 4.00 and our consolidated interest coverage ratio was
3.23 compared to the minimum allowable of 2.75. Our maximum consolidated leverage ratio will be
3.75 starting in the first quarter of 2010 and 3.50 from the third quarter of 2010 to maturity in
2014. Our minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio will be 3.00 starting in the first quarter
of 2010, continuing to maturity in 2014. The Credit Facility also requires we notify the agent
upon the occurrence of a Material Adverse Effect prior to any draw on the Companys revolving
Credit Facility, as such terms are defined and used within our bank Credit Facility. However,
under the Credit Facility, the provision of such a notice is not an event of default, but if such
an event occurred, it could restrict the Companys ability to obtain additional financing under the
revolving Credit Facility. The Credit Facility also stipulates we enter into, and thereafter
maintain, hedge agreements to provide at least 50% of the outstanding term loan into a fixed
interest rate for a period not less than two years. We have entered into fixed rate swap
agreements for $437.5 million or 88% of the outstanding term loan, with fixed interest rates
ranging from 4.97% to 5.09% (see Note 10). The term loan interest rate as of December 31, 2009 was
2.26%. The aggregate weighted average interest rate for the year ended December 31, 2009 was
7.15%, which includes the term loan and
lease interest rates and the difference in the swaps fixed interest rate versus LIBOR. As of
December 31, 2009, we were in compliance with all financial covenants required of our bank Credit
Facility.
F - 20
Table of Contents
Our ability to remain in compliance with those covenants will depend on our ability to generate
sufficient Adjusted Operating Cash Flow (a term defined in our Credit Facility) and cash from
operations, to manage our level of capital investment and to continue to reduce our debt. We
continue taking actions within our control to reduce our debt and remain in compliance with our
debt covenants. The actions within our control include our prudent management of capital
investment and operating costs and exploring other alternatives, which may include seeking an
amendment to our Credit Facility, raising additional capital, wage reductions, reduced service
hours or other reductions to the workforce. In June 2009, we completed a preferred stock offering,
with net proceeds of $53.7 million (see Note 12). We believe we are balancing the interest of our
customers and our Company by reducing our capital investments, reducing our operating cost
structure and aggressively reducing the level of debt. Our ability to continue to comply with
these covenants is subject to the general economic climate and business conditions beyond our
control. Given the continuing softness in the economy and the uncertainties impacting travel and
lodging, in addition to the constraints in the credit markets, consumer conservatism and other
market dynamics, we cannot assure we will be able to meet our planned results and required
covenants. If we are not able to remain in compliance with the debt covenants, it will likely have
a significant, unfavorable impact on our business and financial condition and we may need to amend
the Credit Facility to seek a waiver of the covenants. An amendment to the Credit Facility may
significantly increase our interest costs, add upfront fees or modify other terms less favorable to
us than we currently have in our Credit Facility. In the event our lenders will not amend or waive
the covenants, the debt would be due and we would need to seek alternative financing. We cannot
provide assurance we would be able to obtain alternative financing. If we were not able to secure
alternative financing, this would have a substantial adverse impact on the Company.
During 2009, as part of our debt reduction initiative, we acquired, through a wholly-owned
subsidiary as a permitted investment under our Credit Facility, $31.5 million of outstanding debt
at 70.5% of par value and recorded a gain on the extinguishment of debt of $9.3 million. Under our
Credit Facility, we can make permitted investments, as defined by the Credit Facility, of up to
$25.0 million. Though we expect to comply with all debt covenants during 2010, our ability to
comply with these covenants depends on achieving our planned operating results and making further
debt reductions.
During 2009, we made additional payments totaling $85.3 million on the term loan, including the
required $27.7 million from our preferred stock offering, in addition to the required payments of
$5.8 million, and we wrote off $1.5 million of related debt issuance costs. As a result of our
previous repayments, our required quarterly payments have been reduced.
During 2008, we acquired $2.9 million of our outstanding debt at 50.0% of par value and made
prepayments of $27.5 million on the term loan, resulting in write-offs of $0.4 million of related
debt issuance costs.
The Credit Facility provides for the issuance of letters of credit up to $15.0 million, subject to
customary terms and conditions. As of December 31, 2009, we had outstanding letters of credit
totaling $427,000, which reduce amounts available under the revolving credit facility. We made no
borrowings against this facility during 2009.
Capital Leases As of December 31, 2009, we have total capital lease obligations of $1.9 million.
Equipment acquired under capital lease arrangements totaled $0.2 million, $1.9 million and $1.8
million during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Long-term debt has the following scheduled annual maturities for the years ended December 31
(dollar amounts in thousands):
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 5,098 | $ | 5,098 | $ | 5,098 | $ | 5,098 | $ | 447,606 | ||||||||||
Capital leases |
1,106 | 701 | 288 | 16 | | |||||||||||||||
6,204 | 5,799 | 5,386 | 5,114 | 447,606 | ||||||||||||||||
Less amount representing
interest on capital leases |
(103 | ) | (46 | ) | (13 | ) | (1 | ) | | |||||||||||
$ | 6,101 | $ | 5,753 | $ | 5,373 | $ | 5,113 | $ | 447,606 | |||||||||||
We do not utilize special purpose entities or off-balance sheet financial arrangements.
F - 21
Table of Contents
Note 10 Derivative Information
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted provisions of FASB ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging
Activities. This guidance requires additional disclosures regarding a companys derivative
instruments and hedging activities by requiring disclosure of the fair values of derivative
instruments and gains and losses in a tabular format. It also requires disclosure of derivative
features which are credit risk-related, as well as cross-referencing within the notes to the
financial statements to enable financial statement users to locate important information about
derivative instruments, financial performance and cash flows.
We are required by our Credit Facility to convert 50% of the outstanding term loan into a fixed
interest rate for a period not less than two years. Our objective of entering into hedge
transactions (or interest rate swaps) using derivative financial instruments is to reduce the
variability of cash flows associated with variable-rate loans and comply with the terms of our
Credit Facility. As changes in interest rates impact future interest payments, the hedges provide
an offset to the rate changes. As of December 31, 2009, we had entered into fixed rate swap
agreements for $437.5 million or 88% of the outstanding term loan at an average interest rate of
5.05%.
In April 2007, we entered into interest rate swap agreements with notional values of $312.5
million, at a fixed rate of 5.09%, and $125.0 million, at a fixed rate of 4.97%, both of which
expire in June 2011. In addition, we entered into a $100.0 million notional amount swap in
November 2007, at a fixed rate of 3.97%, which expired in December 2009. These swap arrangements
effectively change the underlying debt from a variable interest rate to a fixed interest rate for
the term of the swap agreements. All of the swap agreements have been issued by Credit Suisse
International. The swap agreements were designated as, and met the criteria for, cash flow hedges
and are not considered speculative in nature.
A summary of the aggregate contractual or notional amounts, balance sheet location and estimated
fair values of our derivative financial instruments as of December 31, 2009 is as follows (dollar
amounts in thousands):
Contractual/ | Estimated Fair | |||||||||||||
Notional | Balance Sheet | Value | ||||||||||||
Amount | Location | Asset | (Liability) | |||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
$ | 437,500 | Other long-term liabilities | $ | | $ | (26,623 | ) |
The unrecognized loss for all cash flow hedges included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $26.6 million and $40.4 million, respectively.
A summary of the effect of cash flow hedges on our financial statements for the years ended
December 31 is as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
Effective Portion | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income Statement | ||||||||||||||||||||
Location of | Hedge | |||||||||||||||||||
Amount of | Gain (Loss) | Gain (Loss) | Ineffective Portion | |||||||||||||||||
Gain (Loss) | Reclassified From | Reclassified From | Income | |||||||||||||||||
Recognized | Accumulated | Accumulated | Statement | |||||||||||||||||
in Other | Other | Other | Location of | Hedge | ||||||||||||||||
Type of Cash | Comprehensive | Comprehensive | Comprehensive | Gain (Loss) | Gain (Loss) | |||||||||||||||
Flow Hedge | Income | Income | Income | Recognized | Recognized | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2008: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
$ | (16,198 | ) | Interest expense | $ | (7,276 | ) | Interest expense | $ | | ||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
$ | 35,423 | Interest expense | $ | (21,675 | ) | Interest expense | $ | |
F - 22
Table of Contents
Note 11 Commitments and Contingencies
Programming Agreements We obtain non-exclusive rights to show recently released major motion
pictures from motion picture studios pursuant to an agreement with each studio, which is typically
two to five years in length. The royalty rate for each movie is pre-determined, with the studio
receiving a percentage of the gross revenue from the movie. For our television on-demand
programming, we obtain rights to release television on-demand content, for which we pay a
predetermined percentage of gross revenue or a one-time fixed fee. In addition, we obtain
non-exclusive rights to cable or premium television programming through an agreement with a third
party provider, whereby we pay a fixed monthly fee. We obtain independent films, most of which are
non-rated and intended for mature audiences, for a one-time fixed fee. We also have rights to
digital music content through our wholly-owned subsidiary. We obtain our selection of Nintendo
video games pursuant to a non-exclusive license agreement with Nintendo. Under the terms of the
agreement, we pay a monthly fee based on revenue generated from Nintendo video game services. For
our Hotel SportsNETSM programming, we obtain the rights to exhibit on-demand sporting
event content for which we pay a predetermined percentage of gross revenue, subject to a minimum
guarantee. These agreements contain various restrictions, including default and termination
procedures.
Minimum Guarantees In connection with our programming related agreements, we may guarantee
minimum royalties for specific periods or by individual programming content. Generally, our
programming contracts are two to five years in length. The unpaid balance of programming related
minimum guarantees, reflected as a liability in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31,
2009, was approximately $1.4 million.
At December 31, 2009, our obligations for programming related guarantees and purchase commitments
aggregated to approximately $6.5 million, including the amount noted above.
Operating Leases We have entered into certain operating leases, which at December 31, 2009,
require future minimum lease payments, as follows: 2010 $2.3 million; 2011 $0.9 million; 2012
$0.5 million; 2013 $0.4 million, and 2014 $0.1 million. The leases, which relate to
combination warehouse/office facilities for installation and service operations, expire at dates
ranging from 2010 to 2015. Rental expense under all operating leases was $2.0 million, $2.6
million and $2.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Legal Proceedings We are subject to litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We
believe the resolution of such litigation will not have a material adverse effect upon our
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
On November 17, 2009, Nomadix, Inc., a Delaware corporation based in Newbury Park, California,
filed an action for patent infringement in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of
California in Los Angeles, California. The suit alleges the Company and its subsidiaries On
Command Corporation and LodgeNet StayOnline, Inc. infringe five patents: a patent issued October
10, 2000, entitled Nomadic Translator or Router, a patent issued on August 6, 2006 entitled
System and Method for Establishing Network Connection with Unknown User or Device, a patent
issued on June 30, 2009 entitled System and Method for Establishing Network Connection with
Unknown Network and/or User Device, a patent issued on October 21, 2003 entitled Systems and
Methods for Redirecting Users Having Transparent Computer Access to a Network Using a Gateway
Device Having Redirection Capability, and a patent issued on March 15, 2005 entitled Systems and
Methods for Integrating a Network Gateway Device with Management Systems. The complaint also
asserts claims under the above-mentioned patents and additional patents against a number of other
defendants, including Hewlett-Packard Company, Wayport, Inc., Ibahn Corporation, Guest-Tek
Interactive Entertainment Ltd. and Guest-Tek Entertainment Inc., Aruba Networks, Inc., Superclick,
Inc. and Superclick Networks, Inc. Nomadix, Inc. also filed a similar action in the same court
against SolutionInc. It is anticipated all pending cases will be consolidated. The complaint does
not specify an amount in controversy. The Company believes it does not infringe the patents in
question, has filed responsive pleadings and is vigorously defending the action.
F - 23
Table of Contents
Note 12 Stockholders Equity
Perpetual Preferred Stock The Board of Directors may authorize the issuance of preferred stock,
$.01 par value, in one or more series and with rights and privileges for each issue as determined
by the Board of Directors. In June 2009, we entered into a purchase agreement with Merrill Lynch,
Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, initial purchaser, to sell 50,000 shares of our 10% Series B
Cumulative Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share, with a liquidation
preference of $1,000 per share. The initial purchaser was also granted a 30-day option to purchase
up to an additional 7,500 shares of the preferred stock to cover overallotments. We completed our
offering of 57,500 shares (inclusive of the initial purchasers option to purchase the additional
7,500 shares), bringing the total aggregate liquidation preference of the preferred stock sold to
$57.5 million. Net proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock were $53.7 million, with offering
and related costs totaling $3.8 million.
Subject to the declaration of dividends by our Board of Directors, cumulative dividends on the
preferred stock will be paid at a rate of 10% per annum of the $1,000 liquidation preference per
share, starting from the date of original issue, June 29, 2009. Dividends accumulate quarterly in
arrears on each January 15, April 15, July 15 and October 15, beginning on October 15, 2009.
However, payments must come from funds legally available for dividend payments.
Dividends were declared on the preferred stock by our Board of Directors. On October 14, 2009, we
paid $1.7 million of dividends, and as of December 31, 2009, we had $1.4 million of unpaid
dividends. These dividends were paid on January 14, 2010. The dividends were recorded as a
reduction to our additional paid-in capital, due to our accumulated deficit balance.
The preferred stock is convertible at any time, at the option of the holder, at an initial
conversion rate of 264.5503 shares of common stock per share of preferred stock, equal to an
initial conversion price of $3.78 per share. This represents a conversion premium of approximately
10%, based on the closing bid price of $3.43 per share of common stock on June 23, 2009.
On or prior to July 15, 2014, we may elect to convert some or all of the preferred stock into
shares of common stock, if the closing price of our common stock has exceeded 150% of the
conversion price for at least 20 of the 30 consecutive trading days ending the trading day before
our notice of the conversion. If we elect to convert any preferred stock on or prior to July 15,
2014, we will also make a payment on the preferred stock, in cash or shares of common stock, equal
to the aggregate amount of dividends which would have accumulated and become payable through and
including July 15, 2014, less any dividends already paid on the preferred stock.
After July 15, 2014, we may elect to convert some or all of the preferred stock into shares of
common stock, if the closing price of our common stock has exceeded 125% of the conversion price
for at least 20 of the 30 consecutive trading days ending the trading day before our notice of the
conversion. If we elect to convert any preferred stock after July 15, 2014, we will make an
additional payment on the preferred stock, in cash or shares of common stock, for all accumulated
and unpaid dividends to and including the conversion date.
If the holder elects to convert their shares of preferred stock in connection with a fundamental
change, as defined, (such as a merger or acquisition) which occurs on or prior to July 14, 2014, we
will increase the conversion rate of the preferred stock surrendered for conversion. In addition,
upon a fundamental change when the stock price of the common stock is less than $3.43 per share
(the closing bid price as of June 23, 2009), the holder may require us to convert some or all of
the preferred stock at a conversion rate equal to the liquidation preference, plus all accumulated
and unpaid dividends, divided by 97.5% of the market price of our common stock, subject to a cap on
the aggregate number of shares of common stock to be issued.
Common Stock In April 2007, we issued 2.05 million shares of common stock as part of the
purchase price of On Command (see Note 3). The fair value of the common stock issued was $50.1
million. In connection with the acquisition of On Command in April 2007, we completed the sale of
1 million shares of our common stock to PAR Investment Partners, L.P. in exchange for $23.4 million
in cash. The proceeds from this transaction were used to fund a portion of the On Command purchase
price.
F - 24
Table of Contents
Share Repurchase Program In December 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a stock
repurchase program of up to $15.0 million, the full amount currently permitted under our Credit
Facility. During 2007, we repurchased 60,000 shares at a cost of $1.0 million (an average price of
$17.91 per share). During 2008, we repurchased 470,000 shares at a cost of $4.7 million (an
average price of $9.92 per share) and $9.3 million remained available under the plan for share
repurchases. We retired 350,000 of the repurchased shares in March 2008 and the remaining 180,000
repurchased shares in March 2009.
Stockholder Rights Plan In February 2008, we adopted a stockholder rights plan, which was
approved by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting on May 14, 2008. The rights plan is intended to
maximize stockholder value by providing flexibility to the Board of Directors in the event an offer
for LodgeNet is received which is either inadequate or not in the best interest of all
stockholders.
Note 13 Stock Option Plans
The LodgeNet Interactive Corporation 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the 2003 Plan)
provides for the award of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock,
stock appreciation rights and phantom stock units. The stockholders approved and adopted this plan
at the 2003 Annual Meeting and approved an amendment to the plan at the Annual Meeting in May of
2006. As of December 31, 2009, there were 2,600,000 shares authorized under this plan and 947,012
shares available for grant. In addition to the stock option and restricted stock awards currently
outstanding under the 2003 Plan, we have stock options outstanding under previously approved plans,
which are inactive.
Certain officers, directors and key employees have been awarded restricted stock and options to
purchase common stock of LodgeNet under the 2003 Plan and other prior plans. Stock options issued
under the plans have an exercise price equal to the fair market value, as defined by the terms of
the plan, on the date of grant. The stock options become exercisable in accordance with vesting
schedules determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, and expire ten years
after the date of grant. Restrictions applicable to restricted stock lapse based either on
performance or service conditions as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors.
We measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based awards based on estimated fair
values, net of estimated forfeitures. Share-based compensation expense recognized in 2009, 2008
and 2007 includes: (a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet
vested, as of January 1, 2006 and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted
subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the
provisions of this topic.
The following amounts were recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for share-based
compensation plans for the years ended December 31 (dollar amounts in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Compensation Cost: |
||||||||||||
Stock options |
$ | 1,057 | $ | 1,185 | $ | 506 | ||||||
Restricted stock |
667 | 1,090 | 1,231 | |||||||||
Total share-based compensation expense |
$ | 1,724 | $ | 2,275 | $ | 1,737 | ||||||
For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the cash received from stock option exercises
was nominal. Cash received from stock option exercises for the year ended December 31, 2007, was
$17.1 million. Due to our net operating loss tax position, we did not recognize a tax benefit from
options exercised under the share-based payment arrangements.
F - 25
Table of Contents
Stock Options
For the year ended December 31, 2009, we granted 35,000 stock options to non-employee directors of
the Company and granted 256,500 stock options to certain officers and employees. The valuation
methodology used to determine the fair value of the options issued during the year was the
Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes-Merton model requires the use of
exercise behavior data and the use of a number of assumptions, including volatility of the stock
price, the weighted average risk-free interest rate and the weighted average expected life of the
options. We do not pay dividends; therefore, the dividend rate variable in the
Black-Scholes-Merton model is zero.
The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates on zero coupon U.S.
Treasury bonds whose maturity period is appropriate for the term of our stock options and is
calculated by using the average monthly yield equivalent to the options expected term.
The volatility assumption is measured as the fluctuation or movement of the Companys stock price
over a time period corresponding to the expected life of the option. We calculate volatility as
the annualized standard deviation of the natural logarithms of relative stock prices over the
options expected term and is based on monthly historical stock prices through the month preceding
the grant date.
The expected life of stock options granted to employees and non-employee directors represents the
weighted average period those options are expected to remain outstanding and is based on analysis
of historical behavior of employees and non-employee director option holders. Prior to 2008, the
expected life of stock options granted to employees represents the weighted average of the result
of the simplified method applied to plain vanilla options granted during the period, as
provided within SAB No. 110.
Share-based compensation expense recognized in our results for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008, and 2007 is based on awards ultimately expected to vest and has been reduced for estimated
forfeitures. Our forfeiture rates were estimated based on our historical experience.
The weighted average fair value of options granted and the assumptions used in the
Black-Scholes-Merton model during the years ended December 31 are set forth in the table below:
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Weighted average fair value of options granted |
$ | 1.61 | $ | 5.32 | $ | 16.40 | ||||||
Dividend yield |
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||
Weighted average risk-free interest |
4.3 | % | 4.4 | % | 4.5 | % | ||||||
Weighted average expected volatility |
72.0 | % | 45.4 | % | 49.6 | % | ||||||
Weighted average expected life employee |
5.25 years | 5.25 years | 6.25 years | |||||||||
Weighted average expected life officers |
5.75 years | 5.75 years | 6.25 years | |||||||||
Weighted average expected life non-employee director |
8.00 years | 8.00 years | N/A |
F - 26
Table of Contents
The following is a summary of the stock option activity for the years ended December 31:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | |||||||||||||||
Average | Remaining | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Exercise | Term | Intrinsic | ||||||||||||||
Options | Price | in Years | Value | |||||||||||||
Outstanding, December 31, 2006 |
1,872,954 | $ | 16.85 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
127,500 | 30.51 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(818,454 | ) | 15.96 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited/canceled |
(16,550 | ) | 17.78 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding, December 31, 2007 |
1,165,450 | 18.96 | ||||||||||||||
Granted |
371,500 | 11.32 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(100 | ) | 10.24 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited/canceled |
(124,500 | ) | 17.27 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding, December 31, 2008 |
1,412,350 | 17.10 | ||||||||||||||
Granted |
291,500 | 2.23 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(3,000 | ) | 0.70 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited/canceled |
(18,550 | ) | 19.28 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding, December 31, 2009 |
1,682,300 | $ | 14.48 | 5.3 | $ | 1,069,705 | ||||||||||
Options exercisable, December 31, 2009 |
1,114,468 | $ | 17.20 | 3.6 | $ | 56,100 | ||||||||||
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the difference between the closing
stock price on December 31, 2009 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money
options which would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their
options on December 31, 2009. The total intrinsic value of options exercised for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 was nominal. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the total intrinsic
value of options exercised was approximately $12.3 million.
The fair value of options vested during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 was
approximately $1,105,000, $783,000, and $190,000, respectively.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, 17,050 vested options to purchase shares with a weighted
average exercise price of $18.76 expired. The remaining outstanding share options expire in 2010
through 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2008, 31,000 vested option to purchases shares with
a weighted average exercise price of $11.35 expired, and for the year ended December 31, 2007,
3,550 vested options to purchase shares with a weighted average exercise price of $21.68 expired.
Restricted Stock
For the year ended December 31, 2009, no time-based restricted stock awards were granted, while for
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we awarded 26,000 and 16,323 shares of time-based
restricted stock, respectively, to certain officers pursuant to our 2003 Stock Option and Incentive
Plan. The shares vest over four years from the date of grant, with 50% vested at the end of year
three and 50% at the end of year four. However, in 2007, 3,823 shares were awarded with 50%
vesting in the first quarter of 2008, and 50% vesting in the first quarter of 2009. The fair value
of the restricted stock is equal to the fair market value, as defined by the terms of the 2003
Plan, on the date of grant and is amortized ratably over the vesting period.
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, we awarded 87,500, 35,000 and 12,000 shares
of time-based restricted stock, respectively, to our non-employee directors pursuant to our 2003
Stock Option and Incentive Plan. The shares vested 50% at the date of grant and 50% on the
one-year anniversary of the date of grant. The fair value of the restricted stock is equal to the
fair market value, as defined by the terms of the 2003 Plan, on the date of grant and is amortized
50% at the date of grant and 50% ratably over the one year vesting period.
F - 27
Table of Contents
We recorded the following amounts in our Consolidated Statements of Operations related to
restricted stock for the years ended December 31 (dollar amounts in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Compensation cost restricted stock: |
||||||||||||
Time-based vesting |
$ | 667 | $ | 595 | $ | 753 | ||||||
Performance-based vesting |
| 495 | 478 | |||||||||
Total share-based compensation expense restricted stock |
$ | 667 | $ | 1,090 | $ | 1,231 | ||||||
A summary of the status of restricted stock and changes as of December 31, 2009 is set forth
below:
Time Based | Performance Based | |||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||
Average | Average | |||||||||||||||
Restricted | Grant-date | Restricted | Grant-date | |||||||||||||
Stock | Fair Value | Stock | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Outstanding, beginning of period |
92,084 | $ | 16.08 | 99,034 | $ | 14.68 | ||||||||||
Granted |
87,500 | 4.63 | | | ||||||||||||
Vested |
(85,709 | ) | 8.21 | (97,950 | ) | 14.50 | ||||||||||
Forfeited/canceled |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Outstanding, end of period |
93,875 | $ | 12.60 | 1,084 | $ | 31.10 | ||||||||||
Unrecognized Compensation Expense
As of December 31, 2009, unrecorded compensation costs related to awards issued under our various
share-based compensation plans are as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
Weighted average | ||||||||
December 31, | recognition period | |||||||
2009 | (months) | |||||||
Unrecognized compensation cost: |
||||||||
Stock options, net of expected forfeitures |
$ | 1,711 | 28.1 | |||||
Restricted stock time based vesting |
329 | 10.8 | ||||||
Restricted stock performance based vesting |
| | ||||||
Total unrecognized compensation cost |
$ | 2,040 | ||||||
Note 14 Employee Benefit Plans
We sponsor defined contribution plans covering eligible employees. The plans provide for employer
contributions based on the level of employee participation. In response to the current and
anticipated economic uncertainties, in November 2008 we implemented an expense reduction program,
which included, among other things, the suspension of the 401(k) corporate matching contribution.
Therefore, our contribution expense for 2009 was $0 and our contribution expense for 2008, prior to
the suspension, was $1.3 million. Our contribution expense was $1.0 million in 2007. The 401(k)
corporate matching contribution is currently suspended for 2010.
F - 28
Table of Contents
Note 15 Restructuring
As a result of our post acquisition activities, we incurred nominal restructuring costs during the
year ended December 31, 2009, while we incurred restructuring costs of approximately $3.2 million
during the year ended December 31, 2008. Restructuring expenses for 2009 consisted of
approximately $0.4 million related to the consolidation or closure of acquired facilities and a
reduction of approximately $0.4 million in employee severance costs, due to unused outplacement
services and insurance benefits. Restructuring expenses for 2008 consisted of approximately $1.4
million in employee severance, $1.6 million in redundant acquired facility consolidation and $0.2
million of other restructuring costs. All restructuring costs are included in operating expenses
on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Employee severance costs relate to the phase out of
duplicate general and administrative functions. Redundant facility expenses related to the
consolidation of certain leased offices and corporate systems infrastructure, including the early
termination of a support agreement.
In the fourth quarter of 2008, we implemented an expense reduction program in response to the
economic uncertainties, which included a reduction in our general workforce and the closing of our
Atlanta call center location and two ancillary offices. The reduction in force resulted in a
decrease in our employee base by approximately 20%. As a result of the reduction in force and the
facilities closure, we incurred $0.3 million of severance related costs and $0.3 million of
consolidation or closure of facilities costs during the year ended December 31, 2009. Reduction in
force costs for 2008 consisted of $1.9 million of severance related costs. All reduction in force
costs are included in operating expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
We estimate additional expenses charged to restructuring over the next twelve to eighteen months,
primarily recurring facilities expenses related to the post acquisition restructuring and reduction
in force initiatives noted above, will be less than $0.1 million. Additional accruals and cash
payments related to the restructuring activities are dependent upon execution of additional
subleasing arrangements or reduction in force, which could change our expense estimates.
The above restructuring activities primarily occurred within our Hospitality business. Liabilities
associated with our restructuring activities to date, along with charges to expense and cash
payments, were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
Cost of closing | ||||||||||||||||
Severance and | redundant | |||||||||||||||
other benefit | acquired | |||||||||||||||
related costs | facilities | Other | Total | |||||||||||||
December 31, 2007 balance |
$ | 5,289 | $ | 485 | $ | | $ | 5,774 | ||||||||
Charges to expense |
3,277 | 1,587 | 183 | 5,047 | ||||||||||||
Cash payments |
(6,570 | ) | (1,632 | ) | (183 | ) | (8,385 | ) | ||||||||
December 31, 2008 balance |
$ | 1,996 | $ | 440 | $ | | $ | 2,436 | ||||||||
Charges to expense |
(77 | ) | 680 | | 603 | |||||||||||
Cash payments |
(1,583 | ) | (698 | ) | | (2,281 | ) | |||||||||
December 31, 2009 balance |
$ | 336 | $ | 422 | $ | | $ | 758 | ||||||||
Note 16 Income Taxes
Loss before income taxes was as follows for the years ended December 31 (dollar amounts in
thousands):
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Domestic |
$ | (11,401 | ) | $ | (48,578 | ) | $ | (67,692 | ) | |||
Foreign |
2,009 | 1,009 | 1,837 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | (9,392 | ) | $ | (47,569 | ) | $ | (65,855 | ) | |||
F - 29
Table of Contents
The provision (benefit) for income taxes varies from the federal statutory rate applied to
total income as follows for the years ended December 31 (dollar amounts in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Federal income tax (benefit) computed at
statutory rate (35%) |
$ | (3,287 | ) | $ | (16,652 | ) | $ | (23,049 | ) | |||
State income taxes, net of federal benefit |
353 | 466 | 403 | |||||||||
Impairment charge |
479 | 3,924 | | |||||||||
Other non-deductible items |
60 | 124 | 345 | |||||||||
Other |
| | (58 | ) | ||||||||
Net change to valuation allowance, excluding
change due to acquisitions |
3,158 | 12,987 | 21,676 | |||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
$ | 763 | $ | 849 | $ | (683 | ) | |||||
The provision (benefit) for income taxes was as follows for the years ended December 31
(dollar amounts in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Current: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
State |
543 | 642 | 622 | |||||||||
Foreign |
220 | 207 | (1,305 | ) | ||||||||
763 | 849 | (683 | ) | |||||||||
Deferred: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
State |
| | | |||||||||
Foreign |
| | | |||||||||
| | | ||||||||||
Total income tax expense (benefit) |
$ | 763 | $ | 849 | $ | (683 | ) | |||||
Deferred income taxes, which result from the net tax effects of temporary differences between the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used
for income tax purposes, consist of the following at December 31 (dollar amounts in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||||||
Tax net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards |
$ | 197,142 | $ | 204,466 | $ | 216,134 | ||||||
Capital loss carryforwards |
| | 1,469 | |||||||||
Reserves and accruals |
2,320 | 2,854 | 1,579 | |||||||||
Net deferred revenue |
5,766 | 5,753 | 4,636 | |||||||||
Book over tax depreciation/amortization |
| | | |||||||||
Other tax assets |
10,690 | 9,457 | 8,292 | |||||||||
Valuation allowance |
(194,576 | ) | (201,104 | ) | (197,232 | ) | ||||||
Total deferred tax assets |
21,342 | 21,426 | 34,878 | |||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Reserves and accruals |
(3,252 | ) | | | ||||||||
Tax over book depreciation/amortization |
(18,090 | ) | (21,426 | ) | (34,878 | ) | ||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities |
(21,342 | ) | (21,426 | ) | (34,878 | ) | ||||||
Net deferred tax liability |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
F - 30
Table of Contents
We evaluated the realization of deferred tax assets and reduced the carrying amount of these
deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance. We considered various factors when assessing the
future realization of our deferred tax assets, including our recent cumulative earnings experience
by taxing jurisdiction, expectations of future taxable income, the carryforward periods available
to us for tax reporting purposes and other relevant factors. Significant judgment is required in
making this assessment.
Our valuation allowance decreased $6.5 million in 2009. This decrease was primarily due to the
expiration of federal and state net operating losses and other tax attributes.
In 2008, we reported an acquired valuation allowance of $51.8 million for the deductible temporary
differences, operating loss or tax credit carryforwards as a result of a 2007 acquisition. If this
valuation allowance is recognized in the future by elimination of the acquired valuation allowance
of $51.8 million, it shall reduce income tax expense.
At December 31, 2009, we had net operating loss carryforwards for United States federal income tax
purposes aggregating approximately $495.5 million and $490.3 million for United States state and
local income tax purposes. There were also approximately $9.2 million of Canadian federal net
operating loss carryforwards. At December 31, 2009, combined federal alternative minimum tax
credit carryforwards and foreign tax credits totaled $0.5 million, available to offset future
regular tax liabilities. A portion of these loss carryforwards expire each year unless utilized.
Tax loss carryforwards expiring in the next five years are as follows (dollar amounts in
thousands): 2010 $13,187; 2011 $16,526; 2012 $15,968; 2013 $0; and 2014 $0.
Current federal and state tax laws include substantial restrictions on the utilization of net
operating losses and tax credits in the event of an ownership change of a corporation.
Accordingly, our ability to utilize net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards generated
prior to the 2007 acquisition may be limited as a result of such ownership change, as defined.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted additional provisions now codified under FASB ASC
Topic 740, Income Taxes, which clarified the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in a companys financial statements and prescribed a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position
taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. In instances where a company has taken or expects
to take a tax position in its tax return, and the company believes it is more likely than not such
tax position will be upheld by the relevant taxing authority, the company may record a benefit for
such tax position in its consolidated financial statements. We are not currently under audit in
any income tax jurisdiction and have not signed any extensions to extend the statute of limitations
to complete an audit. The Companys tax returns remain open for all tax years after 2005, and
therefore may be subject to audit in future periods.
The impact increase (decrease) on our balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 due to the adoption
of the additional provisions of FASB ASC Topic 740 is as follows (dollars amounts in thousands):
Beginning | Ending | |||||||||||||||
Balance | Additions | Deductions | Balance | |||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2008: |
||||||||||||||||
Uncertain Tax Benefit |
$ | 677 | $ | | $ | (96 | ) | $ | 581 | |||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||
Uncertain Tax Benefit |
$ | 581 | $ | | $ | (19 | ) | $ | 562 |
Due to our net operating loss position, the unrecognized tax benefit has the effect of
reducing our deferred tax asset and related valuation allowance. The total amount of unrecognized
tax benefits, which, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate at December 31, 2009, is
$562,000. Unrecognized tax benefits were reduced in 2008 and 2009 by $96,000 and $19,000,
respectively, as a result of a tax position taken and the expiration of statutory periods of
assessment. We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax
expense.
F - 31
Table of Contents
Note 17 Segment Information
As a result of changes in our organization and internal financial reporting completed in the fourth
quarter of 2008, we operate in two reportable segments, Hospitality and Other. We identify our
segments using the management approach, which designates the internal organization used by
management for making operating decisions and assessing performance as the source of our reportable
segments. The Hospitality business distributes entertainment, media and connectivity services to
the hospitality industry. Based on relative size, our Healthcare and Advertising businesses have
been aggregated and are reported within the Other segment. Certain amounts reported in periods
prior to 2008 have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation of revenue and related
direct costs.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of
significant accounting policies, except certain expenses are not allocated to the segments. These
unallocated expenses are corporate overhead, depreciation and amortization expenses, impairment and
restructuring charges, other operating income (expense), interest expense, gains and losses on the
extinguishment and early retirement of debt, other income (expense) and income tax expense. We
evaluate segment performance based upon operating profit and loss before the aforementioned
expenses.
Financial information related to our reportable segments for the years ended December 31 is as
follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Total revenue: |
||||||||||||
Hospitality |
$ | 469,743 | $ | 519,922 | $ | 474,473 | ||||||
Other |
14,749 | 13,957 | 11,115 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 484,492 | $ | 533,879 | $ | 485,588 | ||||||
Loss before income taxes: |
||||||||||||
Hospitality |
$ | 146,714 | $ | 167,104 | $ | 155,464 | ||||||
Other |
(991 | ) | (2,455 | ) | (1,412 | ) | ||||||
Operating profit |
145,723 | 164,649 | 154,052 | |||||||||
Corporate |
(23,245 | ) | (30,365 | ) | (31,619 | ) | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(100,309 | ) | (124,060 | ) | (116,378 | ) | ||||||
Goodwill impairment charge |
| (11,212 | ) | | ||||||||
Restructuring charge |
(603 | ) | (5,047 | ) | (11,158 | ) | ||||||
Other operating income |
126 | 964 | 867 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
(38,092 | ) | (42,551 | ) | (40,950 | ) | ||||||
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
9,292 | 1,446 | | |||||||||
Loss on early retirement of debt |
(1,537 | ) | (448 | ) | (22,195 | ) | ||||||
Other (expense) income |
(747 | ) | (945 | ) | 1,526 | |||||||
Loss before income taxes |
$ | (9,392 | ) | $ | (47,569 | ) | $ | (65,855 | ) | |||
Capital expenditures: |
||||||||||||
Hospitality |
$ | 17,433 | $ | 53,422 | $ | 70,142 | ||||||
Other |
463 | 376 | 85 | |||||||||
Corporate |
3,445 | 10,609 | 8,870 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 21,341 | $ | 64,407 | $ | 79,097 | ||||||
Total assets: |
||||||||||||
Hospitality |
$ | 468,609 | $ | 542,862 | $ | 656,521 | ||||||
Other |
12,344 | 12,508 | 6,458 | |||||||||
Corporate |
27,401 | 34,416 | 30,844 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 508,354 | $ | 589,786 | $ | 693,823 | ||||||
F -32
Table of Contents
The following table presents revenues by country based on the location of the customer for the
years ended December 31 (dollar amounts in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
United States |
$ | 456,167 | $ | 497,860 | $ | 454,063 | ||||||
Canada |
24,992 | 31,327 | 27,794 | |||||||||
Mexico |
1,952 | 2,973 | 2,472 | |||||||||
Other |
1,381 | 1,719 | 1,259 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 484,492 | $ | 533,879 | $ | 485,588 | ||||||
Property and equipment by country based on the location of the assets were as follows at December
31 (dollar amounts in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
United States |
$ | 188,805 | $ | 254,077 | $ | 293,048 | ||||||
Canada |
13,218 | 14,791 | 24,093 | |||||||||
Mexico |
4,640 | 4,962 | 6,822 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 206,663 | $ | 273,830 | $ | 323,963 | ||||||
Note 18 Market Conditions
Due to current economic conditions, our business could be adversely impacted by conditions
affecting the lodging industrys performance. Our results are closely linked to the performance of
the lodging industry, where occupancy rates may fluctuate resulting from various factors. The
percentage of occupied rooms that buy movies and other services at the property also varies over
time with general economic conditions, including but not limited to, consumer sentiment, and other
factors. Reduction in hotel occupancy resulting from the general economic environment or other
changes in market conditions, such as a recession or significant slow-down in economic activity, or
significant international crises, could adversely impact our business, financial condition and
results of operations. The overall travel industry can be, and has been in the past, adversely
affected by weaker general economic climates, geopolitical instability and concerns about public
health. Factors such as the cost of fuel, airline fares, and other economic conditions which
result in a decrease in business or leisure travel can affect hotel occupancy and the demand for
some of our products and services. Also, our goodwill and intangible assets may be impaired if
market conditions deteriorate.
Note 19 Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
The following selected quarterly financial data are in thousands of dollars, except share data:
Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | |||||||||||||
Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | |||||||||||||
March 31, | June 30, | September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
2008 |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 139,787 | $ | 137,347 | $ | 135,320 | $ | 121,425 | ||||||||
Net loss |
(13,011 | ) | (7,461 | ) | (6,278 | ) | (21,668 | ) | ||||||||
Per common share (basic and diluted) |
$ | (0.58 | ) | $ | (0.33 | ) | $ | (0.28 | ) | $ | (0.97 | ) | ||||
2009 |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 128,092 | $ | 121,982 | $ | 121,122 | $ | 113,296 | ||||||||
Net income (loss) |
5,958 | (5,213 | ) | (4,982 | ) | (5,918 | ) | |||||||||
Net income
(loss) attributable to common stockholders |
5,958 | (5,245 | ) | (6,627 | ) | (7,355 | ) | |||||||||
Per common share (basic) |
0.27 | (0.23 | ) | (0.30 | ) | (0.33 | ) | |||||||||
Per common share (diluted) |
$ | 0.26 | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.30 | ) | $ | (0.33 | ) |
F -33
Table of Contents
LodgeNet
Interactive Corporation and Subsidiaries
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Balance | Additions Charged to |
Additions | Additions Related to |
Balance | ||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Costs and | Related to | Other | End of | ||||||||||||||||||||
Description | of Period | Expenses | Acquisition | Accounts | Deductions | Period | ||||||||||||||||||
Allowances
deducted from related balance sheet accounts: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2007: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for Excess or
Obsolete System Components |
$ | 460 | $ | 1,405 | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,190 | $ | 675 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
175 | 392 | | | 135 | 432 | ||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for System Removal |
820 | 2,115 | | | 2,513 | 422 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred Tax
Valuation Allowance |
92,178 | | 64,755 | 40,637 | 338 | 197,232 | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2008: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for Excess or
Obsolete System Components |
$ | 675 | $ | 513 | $ | | $ | | $ | 620 | $ | 568 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
432 | 844 | | | 723 | 553 | ||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for System Removal |
422 | 3,157 | | | 2,314 | 1,265 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred Tax
Valuation Allowance |
197,232 | | | 18,308 | 14,436 | 201,104 | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for Excess or
Obsolete System Components |
$ | 568 | $ | 776 | $ | | $ | | $ | 499 | $ | 845 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
553 | 536 | | | 437 | 652 | ||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for System Removal |
1,265 | 2,641 | | | 3,010 | 896 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred Tax
Valuation Allowance |
201,104 | | | | 6,528 | 194,576 |
F -35