Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-23 - CONSENT - CelLynx Group, Inc. | cellynx_s1-ex23.htm |
As
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 9, 2010
Registration
Statement No. 333-____________
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
S-1
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC.
(Name of
small business issuer in its charter)
Nevada | 3663 | 95-4705831 |
(State of incorporation) | (Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
25910
ACERO, SUITE 370
MISSION
VIEJO, CALIFORNIA 92691
(949)
305-5290
(Address
and telephone number of registrant's principal executive offices
and
principal place of business)
DANIEL R.
ASH
25910
ACERO, SUITE 370
MISSION
VIEJO, CALIFORNIA 92691
(949)
305-5290
(Name,
Address and telephone number of agent for service)
It is
respectfully requested that the Securities and Exchange Commission send copies
of all notices, orders and communications to:
C.
PARKINSON LLOYD
DURHAM
JONES & PINEGAR, P.C.
111 EAST
BROADWAY, SUITE 900
SALT LAKE
CITY, UTAH 84111
(801)
415-3000
APPROXIMATE
DATE PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC:
From time
to time after this Registration Statement becomes effective.
If this
Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule
462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the
Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering. o
If this
Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the
Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this
Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the
Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If
delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, check
the following box. o
CALCULATION
OF REGISTRATION FEE
Title
of Class of Securities to be Registered
|
Amount
to be
Registered
(1)
|
Proposed
Maximum Aggregate Price
Per
Share
|
Proposed
Maximum Aggregate Offering Price (2)
|
Amount
of
Registration
Fee
|
||||||||||||
Common
Stock, $0.001 par value per share
|
40,033,794 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 6,005,070 | $ | 429 |
(1)
|
In
the event of a stock split, stock dividend or similar transaction
involving our common stock, the number of shares registered shall
automatically be increased to cover the additional shares of common stock
issuable pursuant to Rule 416 under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended.
|
(2)
|
The
fee was estimated pursuant to Rule 457(c) under the Act on the basis of
the average of the bid and asked price of the common stock of CelLynx
Group, Inc., as reported on the OTC Bulletin Board on March 5,
2010.
|
THE
REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR DATES AS
MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE A
FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT
SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(A) OF THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR UNTIL THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(A),
MAY DETERMINE.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. The Selling Shareholders may not distribute these securities
until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell
these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in
any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
SUBJECT
TO COMPLETION, DATED MARCH 9, 2010
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC.
a Nevada
corporation
40,033,794
Shares of Common Stock
$0.001
par value per share
This
prospectus covers the sale of up to 40,033,794 shares of our common stock (the
"Shares"). Thirteen of our shareholders (the "Selling
Shareholders"), are offering all of the Shares covered by this
prospectus. The Selling Shareholders will receive all of the proceeds
from the sale of the Shares and we will receive none of those
proceeds. The Selling Shareholders may be an underwriter with respect
to the sale of the Shares.
Investment
in the Shares involves a high degree of risk. You should consider
carefully the risk factors beginning on page 5 of this prospectus before
purchasing any of the Shares offered by this prospectus.
CelLynx
Group, Inc., common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board and trades under
the symbol “CYNX.” The last reported sale price of our common
stock on the OTC Bulletin Board on March 5, 2010, was $0.16 per share.
Nevertheless, the Selling Shareholders do not have to sell the Shares in
transactions reported on the OTC Bulletin Board, and may offer their Shares
through any type of public or private transactions.
Neither
the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has
approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the adequacy or
accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be amended. The Selling
Shareholders may not sell these securities until the Registration Statement
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus
is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to
buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
__________
__, 2010
THIS
PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL ANY SECURITIES OTHER THAN THE
SHARES. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL SECURITIES IN ANY
CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH SUCH AN OFFER IS UNLAWFUL.
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC., HAS NOT AUTHORIZED ANYONE, INCLUDING ANY SALESPERSON OR BROKER, TO
GIVE ORAL OR WRITTEN INFORMATION ABOUT THIS OFFERING, CELLYNX GROUP, INC., OR
THE SHARES THAT IS DIFFERENT FROM THE INFORMATION INCLUDED OR INCORPORATED BY
REFERENCE IN THIS PROSPECTUS. YOU SHOULD NOT ASSUME THAT THE
INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS, OR ANY SUPPLEMENT TO THIS PROSPECTUS, IS
ACCURATE AT ANY DATE OTHER THAN THE DATE INDICATED ON THE COVER PAGE OF THIS
PROSPECTUS OR ANY SUPPLEMENT TO IT. IN THIS PROSPECTUS, REFERENCES TO
"CELLYNX GROUP, INC., " "THE COMPANY," "WE," "US," AND "OUR," REFER TO CELLYNX
GROUP, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Summary
information about Cellynx Group, Inc., and this
offering
|
1 |
Risk
factors
|
5 |
Use
of proceeds
|
11 |
Determination
of offering price
|
11 |
Dilution
|
11 |
Selling
Shareholders
|
11 |
Plan
of Distribution
|
13 |
Description
of Securities
|
15 |
Interests
of Named Experts and Counsel
|
16 |
Information
about the Company
|
16 |
Properties
|
29 |
Legal
proceedings
|
29 |
Management's
discussion and analysis or plan of operation
|
29 |
Disagreements
with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures
|
36 |
Quantitative
and Qualitative disclosures about market risk
|
36 |
Directors,
Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
|
36 |
Executive
Compensation
|
40 |
Security
ownership of certain beneficial owners and management
|
44 |
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
46 |
Index
to financial statements
|
47 |
Experts
|
48 |
Legal
Matters
|
48 |
Summary
information about CelLynx Group, Inc., and this offering
This
summary highlights information included elsewhere in this prospectus. This
summary is not complete and does not contain all the information that may be
important to you. You should carefully read the entire prospectus, especially
the risks set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” and our financial
statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus, before
making an investment decision. Unless the context requires otherwise, references
in this prospectus to “CelLynx,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to CelLynx Group,
Inc., and its subsidiaries.
About
CelLynx
CelLynx
Group, Inc. (“CelLynx,” “we,” or the “Company”), develops and markets the next
generation of cell phone boosters (also known as repeaters or amplifiers) for
the small office, home office (“SOHO”) and vehicle. This next
generation product, CelLynx 5BARz™, is the first consumer-friendly, single-piece
unit that strengthens weak cellular signals to deliver higher quality signals
for voice, data and video reception on cell phones being used indoors or in
vehicles. CelLynx plans to develop its products for use in
North and South America, Europe, Australia, Africa, and Asia, including the
Middle East. The CelLynx product line is intended to be manufactured
by contract manufacturers located in South East Asia. These
manufacturers will allow CelLynx to capitalize on the full advantages of
multiple manufacturing locations with a trained and experienced technical work
force, state of the art facilities and knowledge of all aspects of supply chain
management, operational execution, global logistics and reverse logistics. The
marketing and sales functions will be handled in-house incorporating a
multi-channel strategy that includes distribution partners, wireless service
providers, retail outlets and international joint ventures.
We
believe that poor mobile phone reception and dropped calls are problems for many
mobile phone users, and the problem is magnified with video downloads, cellular
internet and 3G service offerings. CelLynx designs, manufactures and markets
affordable, indoor cellular coverage enhancement solutions for significantly
improving mobile phone coverage. CelLynxTM
offers the industry’s first reliable one-piece, plug ‘n play mobile
signal booster, 5BARz™. The CelLynx family of boosters significantly enhances
your mobile phone reception, reduces or eliminates dropped calls and improves 3G
and 4G services such as music and video downloads and cellular
internet.
We
believe that 5BARz™ is the most affordable and reliable mobile phone booster,
and unlike all other solutions it requires no installation. 5BARz
delivers:
● |
Easy
set-up -- just plug the unit in.
|
|
● |
Stronger
signals, better reception and faster internet (including 3G) in your car,
home, office or your travel destination.
|
|
● |
Works
for all nationally advertised cell phone coverage
plans.
|
The
CelLynx family of products also includes 5BARz™ @Home (available soon) our next
plug ‘n play booster that enhances cell coverage to a larger area. While 5BARz
is portable to your car, office and home office, it only covers one room. With
5BARz @Home you can increase cell phone coverage to potentially cover your
entire home or office suite (up to 2,500 feet per unit, multiple units can work
together for larger areas).
CelLynx’s
principal executive offices are located at 25910 Acero, Suite 370, Mission
Viejo, California 92691. CelLynx’s main telephone number is
(949) 305-5290, and our website address
is www.CelLynx.com. Information provided on our website,
however, is not part of this prospectus, or the registration statement of which
it is a part, and is not incorporated herein.
1
Summary
of Risk Factors
Our
business will involve certain risks, including, but not limited to:
● |
While
the majority of our anticipated revenue will be derived from the ultimate
consumer, decisions by our corporate and government customers about the
timing and scope of capital spending, particularly on major programs, can
have a significant effect on our net sales and
earnings.
|
|
● |
We
may encounter technical problems or contractual uncertainties, which can
cause delays, added costs, lost sales, and liability to
customers.
|
|
● |
Competing
technology could be superior to ours, and could cause customer orders and
net sales to decline.
|
|
● |
Our
competitors’ marketing and pricing strategies could make their products
more attractive than ours. This could cause reductions in customer orders
or company profits.
|
|
● |
Our
transitions to new product offerings can be costly and disruptive, and
could adversely affect our net sales or profitability.
|
|
● |
Our
products may inadvertently infringe third party patents, which could
create substantial liability to our customers or the third-party patent
owners.
|
|
● |
Changes
in regulations that limit the availability of radio frequency licenses or
otherwise result in increased expenses could cause our net sales or
earnings to decline.
|
|
● |
Economic
or political conditions in other countries could cause our net sales or
earnings to decline.
|
|
● |
We
are exposed to the credit risk of some of our customers and to credit
exposures in weakened markets, which could cause our earnings to
decline.
|
|
● |
Our
products typically carry warranties, and the costs to us to repair or
replace defective products could exceed the amounts we have experienced
historically.
|
|
● | We may not effectively manage possible future growth, which could result in reduced earnings. | |
● |
Our
quarterly results are volatile and difficult to predict. If our quarterly
performance results fall short of market expectations, the market value of
our shares is likely to decline.
|
|
● | Future sales of our common stock may cause our stock price to decline. |
See “Risk
Factors” beginning on page 5.
Summary
of this Offering
The
Selling Shareholders under this prospectus and the registration statement of
which it is a part received or will receive their shares in the following
transactions:
2
Unit
Offering
In
December 2009 and January 2010, the Company conducted a private placement of
units (the “Units”). Each Unit consisted of 16,667 shares of the
Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) and a
warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase up to an additional 16,667 shares of Common
Stock, with an exercise price of $0.20 per share. The thirteen
Selling Shareholders purchased Units in the Unit Offering.
This
Prospectus, and the Registration Statement of which is a part, covers the resale
by the selling shareholders of the shares of Common Stock, as well as shares
underlying the Warrants, purchased in the Unit Offering.
The Unit
Offering was made without registration under the 1933 Act in reliance on Section
4(2) of the 1933 Act and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder.
More
information relating to the shares and warrants held by the Selling Shareholders
can be found in the “Selling Shareholders” section below.
Summary
Financial Data
The
following table summarize consolidated financial data regarding the business of
the Company and should be read together with “Management Discussion and Analysis
or Plan of Operation” and the financial statements of the Company and the
related notes included with those financial statements. The summary
financial information as of September 30, 2009 and 2008 and for the year ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 have been derived from CelLynx’s financial
statements. All monetary amounts are expressed in U.S. dollars unless
otherwise indicated.
December
31,
|
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||||
2009
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 28,316 | $ | 6,776 | $ | 599,024 | ||||||
Inventory
|
43,554 | 16,316 | - | |||||||||
Other
current assets
|
114,713 | 15,750 | 6,862 | |||||||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
104,072 | 97,180 | 70,776 | |||||||||
Total
assets
|
323,047 | 163,571 | 697,846 | |||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
977,522 | 832,634 | 206,298 | |||||||||
Accrued
derivative liabilities
|
- | - | 5,677,156 | |||||||||
Convertible
stockholder notes, net
|
103,000 | 101,908 | 14,026 | |||||||||
Convertible
promissory notes, net
|
264,264 | 235,561 | 21,289 | |||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
1,391,111 | 1,198,437 | 5,931,276 | |||||||||
Series
A Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value
|
- | - | 45,516 | |||||||||
Common
stock, $0.001 par value
|
146,419 | 137,379 | 80,553 | |||||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
11,294,129 | 10,501,965 | 2,335,949 | |||||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(12,508,712 | ) | (11,674,210 | ) | (7,695,448 | ) | ||||||
Total
stockholders' deficit
|
$ | (1,068,164 | ) | $ | (1,034,866 | ) | $ | (5,233,430 | ) |
3
For
the Three Months Ended
December
31,
|
For
the Years Ended
December
31,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Net
Revenue
|
$ | 11,820 | $ | - | $ | 10,373 | $ | - | ||||||||
Cost of Revenue | 9,559 | - | 7,544 | - | ||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
2,261 | - | 2,819 | - | ||||||||||||
Research and development | 22,604 | 151,527 | 340,995 | 308,906 | ||||||||||||
General
and administrative
|
766,280 | 621,813 | 3,294,158 | 4,397,131 | ||||||||||||
Non-operating income (expense) | (47,879 | ) | (218,203 | ) | (346,428 | ) | (1,952,499 | ) | ||||||||
Net
loss
|
(834,502 | ) | (991,543 | ) | (3,978,762 | ) | (6,658,536 | ) | ||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
140,714,212 | 107,268,745 | 125,094,999 | 40,407,479 | ||||||||||||
Earnings
per share - Basic and Diluted:
|
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) |
4
Risk
Factors
Caution
Regarding Forward-looking Statements
The
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for
forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. We may from time to time
make written or oral statements that are forward-looking, including statements
contained in this registration statement and other filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and in reports to our shareholders. Such statements may,
for example, express expectations or projections about future actions that we
may take, including restructuring or strategic initiatives or about developments
beyond our control. The terms "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect,"
"objective," "plan," "might," "should," "may," "project," and similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties that
may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those contemplated
by the forward-looking statements. These statements are made on the basis of
management's views and assumptions as of the time the statements are made and we
expressly disclaim any intention or obligation to update these statements. There
can be no assurance that our expectations will necessarily come to pass. The
factors that could materially affect future developments and performance include
those set forth below. We expressly disclaim any obligation or
intention of updating any forward-looking statement for any reason.
You
should carefully consider the risks described below before buying common stock
offered in this Offering. The risks and uncertainties described below are not
the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known
to us or that we currently deem immaterial may impair our business operations.
If any of the adverse events described in this risk factors section actually
occur, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be
materially adversely affected, the trading price of our common stock could
decline and you might lose all or part of your investment. We have had operating
losses and cannot assure you that we will be profitable in the foreseeable
future.
Risk
Factors
Our
business is subject to certain risks, including the risks described below. These
risk factors do not describe all risks applicable to our business and is
intended only as a summary of the most significant factors that affect our
operations and the industries in which we operate. More detailed information
concerning these and other risks is contained in other sections of this
registration statement. The risks described below, as well as the other risks
that are generally set forth in this registration statement, and other risks and
uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently consider
immaterial, could materially and adversely affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition. Readers of this registration statement
should take such risks into account in evaluating any investment decision
involving our common stock. At any point, the trading price of our common stock
could decline, and investors could lose all or a portion of their
investment.
Risks
Related to Our Business
In
addition to general economic conditions, both domestic and foreign, which can
change unexpectedly and generally affect U.S. businesses with worldwide
operations, we are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that are
specific to us or the businesses we operate:
While
the majority of our products will be sold into the consumer market, decisions by
our corporate or government customers about the timing and scope of capital
spending, particularly on major programs, can have a significant effect on our
net sales and earnings.
To a
limited extent, each of our non-consumer businesses is dependent on our
customers’ capital spending decisions, which are affected by numerous factors,
such as general economic conditions, end-user demand for their particular
products, capital availability, and comparative anticipated returns on their
capital investments. Customer decisions as to the nature and timing
of their capital spending can have a significant effect on us. Our net sales and
earnings would decline in the event of general reductions in capital spending by
our customers, or delay in the implementation of, or significant reduction in
the scope of, any of the current or major anticipated programs in which we
participate.
5
We may encounter technical problems or contractual uncertainties, which can cause delays, added costs, lost sales, and liability to customers.
From time
to time, we expect to encounter technical difficulties that may cause delays and
additional costs in our technology development efforts. We are particularly
exposed to this risk in new product development efforts, and in fixed-price
contracts. In these cases, the additional costs that we incur
are not covered by revenue commitments from our customers, and therefore reduce
our earnings. In addition, technical difficulties can cause us to miss expected
delivery dates for new product offerings, which could cause customer orders to
fall short of expectations.
Due to
technological uncertainties in new or unproven applications of technology, our
contracts may be broadly defined in their early stages, with a structure to
accommodate future changes in the scope of work or contract value as technical
development progresses. In such cases, management must evaluate these contract
uncertainties and estimate the future expected levels of scope of work and
likely contract-value changes to determine the appropriate level of revenue
associated with costs incurred. Actual changes may vary from expected changes,
resulting in a reduction of net sales and earnings recognized in future
periods.
If
we cannot continue to rapidly develop, manufacture and market innovative
products and services that meet customer requirements for performance and
reliability, we may incur development costs that we cannot recover and our net
sales and earnings will suffer.
The
process of developing new wireless communications products is complex and
uncertain, and failure to anticipate customers’ changing needs and emerging
technological trends accurately or to develop or obtain appropriate intellectual
property could significantly harm our results of operations. In many instances
we must make long-term investments and commit significant resources before
knowing whether our investments will eventually result in products that the
market will accept. If our new products are not accepted by the market, our net
sales and earnings will decline.
Competing
technology could be superior to ours, and could cause customer orders and net
sales to decline.
The
markets in which we compete are very sensitive to technological advances. As a
result, technological developments by competitors can cause our products to be
less desirable to customers, or even to become obsolete. Those developments
could cause our customer orders and net sales to decline.
Our
competitors’ marketing and pricing strategies could make their products more
attractive than ours. This could cause reductions in customer orders or company
profits.
We
operate in highly competitive technology markets, and some of our competitors
have substantially greater resources and facilities than we do. As a result, our
competition may be able to pursue aggressive marketing strategies, such as
significant price discounting. These competitive activities could cause our
customers to purchase our competitors’ products rather than ours, or cause us to
increase marketing expenditures or reduce prices, in any such case, causing a
reduction of net sales and earnings below expected levels.
Our
transitions to new product offerings can be costly and disruptive, and could
adversely affect our net sales or profitability.
Because
our businesses involve constant efforts to improve existing technology, we
regularly introduce new generations of products. During these transitions,
customers may reduce purchases of older equipment more rapidly than we expect,
or may choose not to migrate to our new products, which could result in lower
net sales and excessive inventories. In addition, product transitions create
uncertainty about both production costs and customer acceptance. These potential
problems are generally more severe if our product introduction schedule is
delayed by technical development issues. These problems could cause our net
sales or profitability to be less than expected.
6
Our products may inadvertently infringe third party patents, which could create substantial liability to our customers or the third-party patent owners.
As we
regularly develop and introduce new technology, we face risks that our new
products or manufacturing techniques may infringe valid patents held or
currently being processed by others. The earliest that the U.S. Patent Office
publishes patents is 18 months after their initial filing, and exceptions exist
so that some applications are not published before they issue as patents. Thus,
we may be unaware of a pending patent until well after we have introduced an
infringing product. In addition, questions of whether a particular product
infringes a particular patent can involve significant uncertainty. As a result
of these factors, third-party patents may require us to redesign our products
and to incur both added expense and delays that interfere with marketing plans.
We may also be required to make significant expenditures from time to time to
defend or pay damages or royalties on infringement claims, or to respond to
customer indemnification claims relating to third-party patents. Such costs
could reduce our earnings.
We
may not be successful in protecting our intellectual property.
Our
unique intellectual property is a critical resource in our efforts to produce
and market technically advanced products. We primarily seek to protect our
intellectual property, including product designs and manufacturing processes,
through patents and as trade secrets. If we are unable to obtain enforceable
patents on certain technologies, or if information we protect as trade secrets
becomes known to our competitors, then competitors may be able to copy or
otherwise appropriate our technology, we would lose competitive advantages, and
our net sales and operating income could decline. In any event, litigation to
enforce our intellectual property rights could result in substantial costs and
diversion of resources that could have a material adverse effect on our
operations regardless of the outcome of the litigation. We may also enter into
transactions in countries where intellectual property laws are not well
developed and legal protection of our rights may be ineffective.
Our
success depends on our ability to attract and retain a highly skilled
workforce.
Because
our products and programs are technically sophisticated, we must attract and
retain employees with advanced technical and program-management skills. Many of
our senior management personnel also possess advanced knowledge of the business
in which we operate and are otherwise important to our success. Other employers
also often recruit persons with these skills, both generally and in focused
engineering fields. If we are unable to attract and retain skilled employees and
senior management, our performance obligations to our customers could be
affected and our net sales could decline.
We
depend on highly skilled suppliers, who may become unavailable or fail to
achieve desired levels of technical performance.
In
addition to our requirements for basic materials and electronic components, our
advanced technological products often require sophisticated subsystems supplied,
manufactured, or cooperatively developed by third parties. To meet
those requirements, our suppliers must have specialized expertise, production
skills and economies of scale, and in some cases there are only a limited number
of qualified potential suppliers. Our ability to perform according to contract
requirements, or to introduce new products on the desired schedule, can be
heavily dependent on our ability to identify and engage appropriate suppliers,
and on the effectiveness of those suppliers in meeting our development and
delivery objectives. If these highly skilled suppliers are unavailable when
needed, or fail to perform as expected, our ability to meet our performance
obligations to our customers could be affected and our net sales and earnings
could decline.
Changes
in regulations that limit the availability of radio frequency licenses or
otherwise result in increased expenses could cause our net sales or earnings to
decline.
7
Many of
our products are incorporated into wireless communications systems that are
regulated in the U.S. by the Federal Communications Commission and
internationally by other government agencies. Changes in government regulations
could reduce the growth potential of our markets by limiting either the access
to or availability of frequency spectrum. In addition, other changes in
government regulations could make the competitive environment more difficult by
increasing costs or inhibiting our customers’ efforts to develop or introduce
new technologies and products. Also, changes in government regulations could
substantially increase the difficulty and cost of compliance with government
regulations for both our customers and us. All of these factors could result in
reductions in our net sales and earnings.
While
the Company has not yet generated international revenue, several factors outside
of our control could effect anticipated earnings.
Unfavorable
currency exchange rate movements can adversely affect the marketability of our
products by increasing the local-currency cost. In addition to these economic
factors directly related to our markets, there are risks and uncertainties
inherent in doing business internationally that could have an adverse effect on
us, such as potential adverse effects of political instability or changes in
governments, changes in foreign income tax laws, and restrictions on funds
transfers by us or our customers, as well as of unfavorable changes in laws and
regulations governing a broad range of business concerns, including proprietary
rights, legal liability, and employee relations. All of these factors could
cause significant harm to our net sales or earnings.
Our
net sales in certain markets depend on the availability and performance of other
companies with which we have marketing relationships.
With
respect to all of our products and applications, we seek to develop marketing
relationships with other companies that have superior direct customer access
from advantages such as specialized software and established customer service
systems. In other markets, a major element of our distribution
channels is a network of value-added retailers and independent distributors. In
foreign markets for many of our products, we are often dependent on successful
working relationships with local distributors and other business personnel. If
we are unable to identify and structure effective relationships with other
companies that are able to market our products, our net sales could fail to grow
in the ways we expect.
Potential
customer orders in backlog may not result in sales.
Our
potential order backlog may represent firm orders for products and services.
However, our customers may cancel or defer orders for products and services, in
most cases without penalty. Cancellation or deferral of an order typically
involves penalties and termination charges for costs incurred to date, but these
termination penalties would still be considerably less than what we would have
expected to earn if the order could have been completed. We make management
decisions based on our backlog, including hiring of personnel, purchasing of
materials, and other matters that may increase our production capabilities and
costs whether or not the backlog is converted into revenue. Cancellations,
delays or reductions of orders could adversely affect our results of operations
and financial condition.
We
are exposed to the credit risk of some of our customers and to credit exposures
in weakened markets, which could cause our earnings to decline.
Most of
our sales are on an open credit basis, with typical payment terms of up to 60
days in the United States and, because of local customs or conditions, longer in
some markets outside the United States. Certain of our customers may experience
credit problems, up to and including bankruptcy. Future losses, if
incurred, could harm our business and have an adverse effect on our operating
results and financial condition. Additionally, to the degree that the recent
turmoil in the credit markets makes it more difficult for some customers to
obtain financing, our customers’ ability to pay could be adversely impacted,
which in turn could have an adverse impact on our business, operating results,
and financial condition.
Our
products typically carry warranties, and the costs to us to repair or replace
defective products could exceed the amounts we have experienced
historically.
8
Most of
our products carry warranties. However, we have some products with longer
warranty periods, and we depend on our reputation for reliability and customer
service in our competition for sales. If our products are returned for repair or
replacement under warranty or otherwise under circumstances in which we assume
responsibility, particularly if at a higher rate than we expect based on
historical experience, we can incur significant costs that may be in excess of
the allowances that we have established based on our historical warranty cost
levels, which would reduce our earnings.
Changes
in our consolidated effective income tax rate and the related effect on our
results can be difficult to predict.
We expect
to earn taxable income in various tax jurisdictions around the world. The rate
of income tax that we pay in each jurisdiction can vary significantly, due to
differing income tax rates and benefits that may be available in some
jurisdictions and not in others.
We
may not effectively manage possible future growth, which could result in reduced
earnings.
We have
recently launched our product, and demand for our product has been difficult to
predict. Growth patterns place significant demands on both our
management personnel and our management systems for information, planning and
control. If we are to achieve strong growth on a profitable basis, our
management must identify and exploit potential market opportunities for our
products and technologies, while continuing to manage our current businesses
effectively. Furthermore, our management systems must support the changes to our
operations resulting from our business growth. If our management and management
systems fail to meet these challenges, our business and prospects will be
adversely affected.
Risks
Related to our Common Stock
In
addition to risks and uncertainties related to our operations, there are
investment risks that could adversely affect the return to an investor in our
common stock and could adversely affect our ability to raise capital for
financing future operations.
Our
quarterly results are difficult to predict. If our quarterly performance results
fall short of market expectations, the market value of our shares is likely to
decline.
The
quarterly net sales and earnings contributions of some of our markets are
heavily dependent on customer orders or product shipments in the final weeks or
days of the quarter. Due to some of the risks related to our business discussed
above, it can be difficult for us to predict the timing of receipt of major
customer orders, and we are unable to control timing decisions made by our
customers. This can create volatility in quarterly results, and hinders our
ability to determine before the end of each quarter whether quarterly earnings
will meet prevailing expectations. The market price for our shares is likely to
be adversely affected by quarterly earnings results that are below analyst and
market expectations.
Our
share price may fluctuate significantly, and an investor may not be able to sell
our shares at a price that would yield a favorable return on
investment.
The
market price of our stock will fluctuate in the future, and such fluctuations
could be substantial. Price fluctuations may occur in response to a variety of
factors, including:
● |
actual
or anticipated operating results,
|
|
● |
the
limited average trading volume and public float for our stock, which means
that orders from a relatively few investors can significantly impact the
price of our stock, independently of our operating
results,
|
|
● |
announcements
of technological innovations, new products or new contracts by us, our
customers, our competitors or our customers’
competitors,
|
9
● |
government
regulatory action,
|
|
● |
developments
with respect to wireless and satellite communications,
and
|
|
● |
general
market conditions.
|
In addition, the stock market has from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have particularly affected the market prices for the stocks of technology companies, and that have been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies.
Future
sales of our common stock may cause our stock price to decline.
Forty-five
percent of our outstanding shares are freely tradable without restriction or
further registration, and shares reserved for issuance upon exercise of stock
options will also be freely tradable upon issuance and vesting, in each case
unless held by affiliates. Sales of substantial amounts of common stock by our
shareholders, including those who have acquired a significant number of shares
in connection with business acquisitions or private investments, or even the
potential for such sales, may depress the market price of our common stock and
could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of our equity
securities.
Provisions
in our governing documents and law could prevent or delay a change of control
not supported by our Board of Directors.
Our
shareholder rights plan and provisions of our amended and restated articles of
incorporation and amended bylaws could make it more difficult for a third party
to acquire us. These documents include provisions that:
● |
authorize
the issuance of up to 100,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock
by our Board of Directors without shareholder approval, which stock could
have terms that could discourage or thwart a takeover
attempt;
|
|
● |
limit
who may call a special meeting of shareholders; and
|
|
● |
establish
advance notice requirements for nominations for election to the Board of
Directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon at shareholder
meetings.
|
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some
discussions in this prospectus may contain forward-looking statements that
involve risks and uncertainties. These statements relate to future events or
future financial performance. A number of important factors could cause our
actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking
statements made by us in this prospectus. Forward-looking statements are often
identified by words like: "believe", "expect", "estimate", "anticipate",
"intend", "project" and similar expressions or words which, by their nature,
refer to future events. In some cases, you can also identify forward-looking
statements by terminology such as "may", "will", "should", "plans", "predicts",
"potential" or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other comparable
terminology. Moreover, statements regarding our projections,
anticipated business plans, potential revenues, business strategic plans, and
other related statements may contain or constitute forward-looking
statements. These statements are only predictions and involve known
and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the
section entitled Risk Factors beginning on page 5 that may cause our or our
industry's actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be
materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. In
addition, you are directed to factors discussed in the Information about the
Company section beginning on page 18, the Management's Discussion and Analysis
or Plan of Operation section beginning on page 31, and as well as those
discussed elsewhere in this prospectus.
Although
we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are
reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, or
achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the
securities laws of the United States, we disclaim any intention or obligation to
update any forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual
results.
10
Our financial statements are stated in United States Dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
Use
of Proceeds
All of
the shares of common stock issued in the various private transactions and in
connection with exercises of the warrants, if and when sold, are being offered
and sold by the Selling Shareholders or their pledgees, donnees,
transferees, or other successors in interest. We will not receive any proceeds
from those sales. Any proceeds we receive from exercise of the
options or warrants will be used for working capital and other general corporate
purposes.
DETERMINATION
OF OFFERING PRICE
The
Selling Shareholders may sell our common stock at prices then prevailing or
related to the then-current market price, or at negotiated
prices. The offering price may have no relationship to any
established criteria or value, such as book value or earnings per
share. Additionally, because we have not generated any profits for
several years, the price of our common stock is not based on past earnings, nor
is the price of the shares of our common stock indicative of current market
value for the assets we own. No valuation or appraisal has been
prepared for our business or possible business expansion.
DILUTION
Not
applicable. We are not offering any shares in this registration statement. All
shares are being registered on behalf of our selling shareholders.
SELLING
SHAREHOLDERS
Selling
Shareholders
The
Selling Shareholders under this prospectus and the registration statement of
which it is a part received or will receive their shares in the following
transactions:
Unit
Offering
In
December 2009 and January 2010, the Company conducted a private placement of
units (the “Units”). Each Unit consisted of 16,667 shares of the
Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) and a
warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase up to an additional 16,667 shares of Common
Stock, with an exercise price of $0.20 per share. The Common Stock
price per share was $0.06.
Eleven of
the Selling Shareholders represented and warranted that they were “accredited
investors” as that term is defined in Regulation D, promulgated pursuant to the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Two of the
Selling Shareholders represented that they each were not a “U.S. Person” as that
term is defined in Regulation S, promulgated pursuant to the Securities
Act.
The
Warrants issued in connection with the Unit Offering have expiration dates
ranging from April 1, 2012, to December 31, 2012. The Exercise Price
of the Warrants is $0.20 per share. The Warrants may be exercised in
whole or in part.
11
The
thirteen
Selling Shareholders are as follows:
Laverne
Assets Group Corp. - John Boschert, President
Maple
Rock Limited - Howard Johnson, President
Belfast
Financial SA - Richard Donaldson
Popix
Associated Corp. - Jose E. Silva, Dianeth M. De Ospino
Robert
Krahn
Michael
Lacoe
Homur
Investment Company LLC - Frits Hoebink
Thomas M.
Curry
Hyperlink
Media LLC - Guillermo Mendoza
Panamerican
Capital Group Inc. – Frederico Rodriguez
David J.
Morfey
Laura
Vekic
Gregory
L. Nelson
(Where
the Selling Shareholder is an entity, the individuals with authority to vote or
transfer the shares are named.)
As noted,
this Prospectus, and the Registration Statement of which is a part, covers the
resale by the selling shareholders of the shares of Common Stock, as well as
shares underlying the Warrants, purchased in the Unit Offering. The
Selling Shareholders will receive all proceeds of the sales of the Shares
covered by this Prospectus, and the Company will receive none of the
proceeds. The Company will, however, receive any payments of the
exercise price in connection with the exercises of any of the Warrants issued in
the Unit Offering.
The Unit
Offering was made without registration under the 1933 Act in reliance on Section
4(2) of the 1933 Act and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder.
This
prospectus and the registration statement of which it is a part covers the
resale of up to 40,033,794 shares of our common stock issued or issuable to the
Selling Shareholders as described above. The following information is not
determinative of the Selling Shareholder’s beneficial ownership of our common
stock pursuant to Rule 13d-3 or any other provision under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Name
of Selling Shareholder
|
Shares
of
Common
Stock Owned by
Selling
Shareholder
Prior
to
Offering
|
Shares
of
Common
Stock Issuable to
Selling
Shareholder
Upon
Exercise
of
Warrants
|
Total
Shares
Issued
or
Issuable
to
Selling
Shareholder
|
Percentage
of Common Stock Issuable to
Selling
Shareholder
(1)
|
Number
of Shares of
Common
Stock Registered Hereunder
|
Number
of
Shares
of
Common
Stock Owned After Offering (2)
|
Percentage
of Common Stock Beneficially
Owned
After the
Offering
(2)
|
Laverne
Assets Group Corp.
|
1,833,370
|
1,833,370
|
3,666,740
|
2.27%(3)
|
3,666,740
|
0
(2)
|
0%
(2)
|
Maple
Rock Limited
|
1,750,035
|
1,750,035
|
3,500,070
|
2.17%(3)
|
3,500,070
|
0
(2)
|
0%
(2)
|
Belfast
Financial SA
|
1,833,370
|
1,833,370
|
3,666,740
|
2.27%(3)
|
3,666,740
|
0
(2)
|
0%
(2)
|
Popix
Associated Corp.
|
916,685
|
916,685
|
1,833,370
|
1.14%(3)
|
1,833,370
|
0
(2)
|
0%
(2)
|
Robert
Krahn
|
300,006
|
300,006
|
600,012
|
0.38%(3)
|
600,012
|
0
(2)
|
0%
(2)
|
Michael
Lacoe
|
166,670
|
166,670
|
333,340
|
0.21%(3)
|
333,340
|
0
(2)
|
0%
(2)
|
Homur
Investment Company LLC
|
333,340
|
333,340
|
666,680
|
0.21%(3)
|
666,680
|
0
(2)
|
0%
(2)
|
Thomas
M. Curry
|
83,335
|
83,335
|
166,670
|
0.10%(3)
|
166,670
|
0
(2)
|
0%
(2)
|
Hyperlink
Media LLC
|
4,166,750
|
0
|
4,166,750
|
2.58%(3)
|
4,166,750
|
0
(2)
|
0%
(2)
|
Panamerican
Capital Group Inc.
|
0
|
4,166,750
|
4,166,750
|
2.51%(3)
|
4,166,750 | 0 (2) | 0% (2) |
David
J. Morfey
|
7,500,000
|
7,500,000
|
15,000,000
|
8.98%(3)
|
15,000,000
|
0
(2)
|
0%
(2)
|
Laura
Vekic
|
1,000,000
|
1,000,000
|
2,000,000
|
1.25%(3)
|
2,000,000
|
0
(2)
|
0%
(2)
|
Gregory
L. Nelson
|
133,336
|
133,336
|
266,672
|
0.17%(3)
|
266,672
|
0
(2)
|
0%
(2)
|
_____________________
12
(1)
|
The
percentages set forth are not determinative of the Selling Shareholder's
beneficial ownership of our Common Stock pursuant to Rule 13d-3 or any
other provision under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
|
(2)
|
Assumes
a hypothetical exercise of all of the Warrants acquired in the Unit
Offering by the Selling Shareholder and the sale by the Selling
Shareholder of the shares of Common Stock acquired in the Unit Offering
and upon exercise of the Warrants in connection with that hypothetical
exercise. There is no assurance that the Selling Shareholder
will sell any or all of the shares offered hereby. This number
and percentage may change based on the Selling Shareholder’s decision to
sell or hold the Shares.
|
(3)
|
The
percentage given assumes the full exercise of the warrants
listed. There can be no guarantee as to whether or when the
Selling Shareholder will exercise all or any of the warrants
listed.
|
PLAN
OF DISTRIBUTION
Plan of
Distribution
The
Selling Shareholders, their pledgees, donees, transferees or other successors in
interest, may from time to time sell the shares of our Common Stock directly to
purchasers or indirectly to or through underwriters, broker-dealers or agents.
The Selling Shareholders may sell all or part of their shares in one or more
transactions at fixed prices, varying prices, prices at or related to the
then-current market price or at negotiated prices. The Selling Shareholders will
determine the specific offering price of the Shares from time to time that, at
that time, may be higher or lower than the market price of our Common Stock
quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board.
The
Selling Shareholders and any underwriters, broker-dealers or agents
participating in the distribution of the Shares of our Common Stock may be
deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933,
and any profit from the sale of such shares by the Selling Shareholder and any
compensation received by any underwriter, broker-dealer or agent may be deemed
to be underwriting discounts under the Securities Act. The Selling Shareholders
may agree to indemnify any underwriter, broker-dealer or agent that participates
in transactions involving sales of shares against certain liabilities, including
liabilities arising under the Securities Act.
Because
the Selling Shareholders may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning
of the Securities Act, the Selling Shareholders will be subject to the
prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act. We have informed the
Selling Shareholders that the anti-manipulative provisions of Regulation M
promulgated under the Exchange Act may apply to their sales in the market. With
certain exceptions, Regulation M precludes the Selling Shareholders, any
affiliated purchasers, and any broker-dealer or other person who participates in
such distribution from bidding for or purchasing, or attempting to induce any
person to bid for or purchase any security which is the subject of the
distribution until the entire distribution is complete. Regulation M also
prohibits any bids or purchases made in order to stabilize the price of a
security in connection with the distribution of that security.
The
method by which the Selling Shareholders, or their pledgees, donees, transferees
or other successors in interest, may offer and sell their Shares may include,
but are not limited to, the following:
13
● |
sales
on the over-the-counter market, or other securities exchange on which the
Common Stock is listed at the time of sale, at prices and terms then
prevailing or at prices related to the then-current market
price;
|
|
● |
sales
in privately negotiated transactions;
|
|
● |
sales
for their own account pursuant to this
prospectus;
|
|
● |
through
the writing of options, whether such options are listed on an options
exchange or otherwise through the settlement of short
sales;
|
|
● |
cross
or block trades in which broker-dealers will attempt to sell the shares as
agent, but may position and resell a portion of the block as a principal
in order to facilitate the transaction;
|
|
● | purchases by broker-dealers who then resell the shares for their own account; | |
● | brokerage transactions in which a broker solicits purchasers; | |
● | any combination of these methods of sale; and | |
● | any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law. |
Any Shares of Common Stock covered by this prospectus that qualify for sale under Rule 144 or Rule 144A of the Securities Act may be sold under Rule 144 or Rule 144A rather than under this prospectus. The Shares of our Common Stock may be sold in some states only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In addition, in some states, the shares of our Common Stock may not be sold unless they have been registered or qualified for sale or the sale is entitled to an exemption from registration.
The
Selling Shareholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or
other financial institutions. In connection with such transactions,
broker-dealers or other financial institutions may engage in short sales of our
securities in the course of hedging the positions they assume with the Selling
Shareholder. The Selling Shareholders may also enter into options or other
transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions which require
the delivery to such broker-dealer or other financial institution of the
securities offered hereby, which shares such broker-dealer or other financial
institution may resell pursuant to this prospectus (as supplemented or amended
to reflect such transaction).
To our
knowledge, there are currently no plans, arrangements or understandings between
the Selling Shareholder and any underwriter, broker-dealer or agent regarding
the sale of Shares of our Common Stock by the Selling Shareholders.
The
Selling Shareholders will pay all fees, discounts and brokerage commissions in
connection with any sales, including any fees to finders. We will pay all
expenses of preparing and reproducing this prospectus, including expenses of
compliance with state securities laws and filing fees with the SEC.
Under
applicable rules and regulations under Regulation M under the Exchange Act, any
person engaged in the distribution of securities may not simultaneously engage
in market making activities, subject to certain exceptions, with respect to the
securities for a specified period set forth in Regulation M prior to the
commencement of such distribution and until its completion. In addition and with
limiting the foregoing, the Selling Shareholders will be subject to the
applicable provisions of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder, including, without limitation, Regulation M, which
provisions may limit the timing of purchases and sales of the securities by
Selling Shareholders. The foregoing may affect the marketability of the
securities offered hereby.
A Selling
Shareholder may be deemed to be an “underwriter” as such term is defined in the
Securities Act, and any commissions paid or discounts or concessions allowed to
any such person and any profits received on resale of the securities offered
hereby may be deemed to be underwriting compensation under the Securities
Act.
Our
Common Stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol
“CYNX.OB.”
14
DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES
Description
of Common Stock
The
Company has authorized 400,000,000 shares of common stock, no par value, and
100,000,000 preferred stock, no par value. Each holder of common stock has one
vote per share on all matters voted upon by the shareholders. Such voting rights
are non-cumulative so that shareholders holding more than 50% of the outstanding
shares of common stock are able to elect all members of the Board of Directors.
There are no preemptive rights or other rights of subscription.
Each
share of common stock is entitled to participate equally in dividends as and
when declared by the Board of Directors of the Company out of funds legally
available, and is entitled to participate equally in the distribution of assets
in the event of liquidation. All shares, when issued and fully paid, are
nonassessable and are not subject to redemption or conversion and have no
conversion rights.
Description
of Preferred Stock
We are authorized to issue 100,000,000
shares of “blank check” preferred stock, none of which is currently designated,
issued or outstanding. Our board of directors is vested with
authority to divide the shares of preferred stock into series and to fix and
determine the relative designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares
of any series and the qualifications, limitations, or restrictions or any
unissued series of preferred stock.
Market
Information
The
Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, is traded on the
Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board ("OTCBB") under the symbol "CYNX." The following
table sets forth, for each quarter within the last two fiscal years, the
reported high and low bid quotations for the Company’s common stock as reported
on the OTCBB. The bid prices reflect inter-dealer quotations, do not include
retail markups, markdowns or commissions and do not necessarily reflect actual
transactions.
QUARTER
|
HIGH
($)
|
LOW
($)
|
1st
Quarter 2008
|
$0.23
|
$0.12
|
2nd
Quarter 2008
|
$0.35
|
$0.18
|
3rd
Quarter 2008
|
$0.28
|
$0.18
|
4th
Quarter 2008
|
$0.26
|
$0.12
|
1st
Quarter 2009
|
$0.22
|
$0.15
|
2nd
Quarter 2009
|
$0.17
|
$0.09
|
3rd
Quarter 2009
|
$0.33
|
$0.09
|
4th
Quarter 2009
|
$0.27
|
$0.17
|
Holders
As of January 12, 2010, there were approximately 177 shareholders of record of our common stock based upon the shareholder list provided by our transfer agent. Our transfer agent is Signature Stock Transfer located at 2632 Coachlight Court, Plano, Texas 75093, and their telephone number is (972) 612-4120.
15
Dividends
We have not declared any dividends on our common stock since our inception. Our current policy is to retain any earnings in order to finance the expansion of our operations. Our board of directors will determine future declaration and payment of dividends, if any, in light of the then-current conditions they deem relevant and in accordance with applicable corporate law. There are no dividend restrictions that limit our ability to pay dividends on our common stock in our Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws. Chapter 78 of the Nevada Revised Statutes (the “NRS”), does provide certain limitations on our ability to declare dividends. Section 78.288 of Chapter 78 of the NRS prohibits us from declaring dividends where, after giving effect to the distribution of the dividend:
(a) | we would not be able to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business; or | |
(b) |
except
as may be allowed by our Articles of Incorporation, our total assets would
be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus the amount that would
be needed, if we were to be dissolved at the time of the distribution, to
satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of stockholders who may
have preferential rights and whose preferential rights are superior to
those receiving the distribution.
|
We have
not declared any dividends and we do not plan to declare any dividends in the
foreseeable future.
INTERESTS
OF NAMED EXPERTS AND COUNSEL
None.
INFORMATION
ABOUT THE COMPANY
Corporate
Background
CelLynx
Group, Inc. (“CelLynx” or the “Company”) was originally incorporated under the
laws of the State of Minnesota on April 1, 1998, under the name “Cool Can
Technologies, Inc.” Effective July 12, 2004, the Company merged (the “Merger”)
with NorPac Technologies, Inc., its wholly owned subsidiary (“Nevada Sub”), for
the purpose of reincorporating the Company in Nevada. The Merger was completed
effective July 12, 2004, with Nevada Sub as the surviving corporation. Upon
completion of the Merger, the Company’s name was changed to NorPac Technologies,
Inc. (“NorPac”).
The
Company had originally been in the business of developing and marketing a
proprietary technology for self-chilling beverage containers (the “Cool Can
Technology”). However, the Company’s patents for the Cool Can Technology
expired, and, as a result, the Company’s management decided to abandon the
development of the Cool Can Technology and seek alternative business
opportunities. To that end, as more fully explained below, on July 24, 2008, the
Company closed a transaction with shareholders of CelLynx, Inc., a California
corporation ("CelLynx-California"), by which it newly issued shares to the
CelLynx-California shareholders in exchange for all outstanding shares of
CelLynx-California. Through this transaction, the Company acquired a
cellular amplifier business as its wholly owned subsidiary. This
transaction has been considered a "reverse take-over" for accounting
purposes.
Effective
August 5, 2008, the Company changed its name to CelLynx Group, Inc. by merging
another wholly owned subsidiary, CelLynx Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation, into
the Company and assuming the subsidiary’s name. On October 27, 2008,
the CelLynx’s Board of Directors approved a change of the Company’s fiscal
year. CelLynx’s new fiscal year will begin on October 1 and end on
September 30 of each year, and the change was applicable with the year ending
September 30, 2008. The Company previously had a June 30 fiscal year
end. The September 30 fiscal year end is also the fiscal year end of
CelLynx-California.
16
The
Reverse Take-Over
On July
24, 2008, the Company closed a reverse take-over transaction by which it
acquired a cellular amplifier business pursuant to a Share Exchange Agreement,
as amended (the “Exchange Agreement”), by and among the Company,
CelLynx, Inc., a California corporation (“ CelLynx-California ”), and
twenty-three (23) CelLynx-California shareholders who, immediately prior to the
closing of the transactions contemplated by the Exchange Agreement, collectively
held 100% of CelLynx-California’s issued and outstanding shares of capital stock
(the “CelLynx Owners”).
Prior to
the closing, on July 23, 2008, the Company entered into a Regulation S
Subscription Agreement (the “Subscription Agreement”) pursuant to which the
Company agreed to issue and sell 10,500,000 shares of its common stock and
warrants to purchase 10,500,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$0.20 per share to non-U.S. persons (the “Investors”) for an aggregate purchase
price of $1,575,000 (the “Financing”).
Prior to
the closing, on July 22, 2008, CelLynx-California entered into a Master Global
Marketing and Distribution Agreement (the “Distribution Agreement”) with
Dollardex Group Corp., a company organized under the laws of
Panama (“Dollardex”), whereby Dollardex shall act as CelLynx-California’s
exclusive distributor of CelLynx-California’s products and related accessories
in the following regions: Canada, South America, Europe, Middle East, China,
India, Australia, Africa and South East Asia.
Immediately
following the closing, on July 24, 2008, two of the new officers and directors,
one of the new employees and one of the new non-officer directors of the Company
entered into a Lock-Up Agreement (the “Lock-Up Agreement”) whereby they agreed
not to transfer their Company shares for a period of 24 months following the
closing of the reverse take-over transaction.
As a
result of the closing of the reverse take-over transaction, the CelLynx Owners
became our controlling shareholders, CelLynx-California became our wholly-owned
subsidiary, and CelLynx-California’s business became our business.
The
following is a brief description of the terms and conditions of the Exchange
Agreement, Subscription Agreement and Distribution Agreement, and the
transactions contemplated thereunder that are material to the
Company.
Share
Exchange
Under the
Exchange Agreement, the Company was to acquire all of the equity interests of
CelLynx-California in exchange for issuing restricted common stock to the
CelLynx Owners in an aggregate amount equal to approximately 70% of the total
issued and outstanding shares of common stock immediately after the closing of
the reverse take-over, taking into account certain derivative shares held by
certain CelLynx Owners and a CelLynx-California noteholder, but exclusive of the
shares issued in the Financing and to certain CelLynx-California
investors. As a result, the CelLynx Owners were to receive
77,970,956 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for 100% of
CelLynx’s common stock. However, the Company had only
41,402,110 authorized, unissued and unreserved shares of common stock available,
after taking into account the shares of common stock issued and reserved in the
Financing described below. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, in the
event that there were an insufficient number of authorized but unissued and
unreserved common stock to complete the transaction, the Company was to issue
all of the available authorized but unissued and unreserved common stock to the
CelLynx Owners in a pro rata manner and then establish a class of Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) and issue that number
of shares of Series A Preferred Stock such that the common stock underlying the
Series A Preferred Stock plus the common stock actually issued to the CelLynx
Owners would equal the total number of shares of common stock due to the CelLynx
Owners under the Exchange Agreement. As a result, the Company issued
to the CelLynx Owners an aggregate of 32,454,922 shares of common stock and
45,516,034 shares of Series A Preferred Stock. The Series A Preferred
Stock automatically converts into common stock on a one-to-one ratio upon the
authorized capital stock of the Company being increased to include not less than
150,000,000 shares of common stock.
17
On
September 22, 2008, shareholders owning in the aggregate 26,441,554 shares of
the Company’s common stock and 40,411,544 shares of the Company’s Series A
Preferred Stock, outstanding as of September 10, 2008 (the “Record Date”),
consented in writing to amend the Company’s articles of incorporation to
increase the number of shares of the Company’s authorized common stock from
100,000,000 to 400,000,000. On October 8, 2008, the Company filed and
mailed a Definitive Information Statement notifying its shareholders of this
action and on November 7, 2008, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to
its Articles of Incorporation (the “Amendment”) with the Secretary of State of
the State of Nevada to increase the number of authorized shares common stock of
the Company from 100,000,000 to 400,000,000. As a result of filing
the Amendment, the 45,516,034 shares of Series A Preferred Stock were
automatically converted into 45,516,034 shares of common stock.
The
Exchange Agreement also provided that all options, warrants and convertible
notes to purchase or acquire shares of CelLynx-California be converted into
options, warrants or convertible notes to purchase or acquire shares of the
Company in the same proportion at which the CelLynx-California shares were
converted into Company shares (the “Conversion Ratio”) under the Exchange
Agreement. The exercise or conversion price for such options,
warrants or convertible notes shall be the exercise price or conversion price of
the CelLynx-California options, warrants or convertible notes divided by the
Conversion Ratio. As a result, 750,000 CelLynx-California options
with an exercise price of $0.018 per share were converted into 943,447 Company
options with an exercise price of $0.014 per share; 375,000 CelLynx-California
options with an exercise price of $0.02 per share were converted into 471,723
Company options with an exercise price of $0.016 per share; 23,394,133
CelLynx-California options with an exercise price of $0.09 per share were
converted into 29,428,166 Company options at an exercise price of approximately
$0.0715 per share; 18,330,544 CelLynx-California options with an exercise price
of $0.099 per share were converted into 23,058,527 Company options with an
exercise price of approximately $0.0787 per share, and, with the exception of
the Palomar Note described below, $40,000 of CelLynx-California convertible
notes with a conversion price of $0.01 per share were converted into $40,000 of
Company convertible notes with a conversion price of approximately $0.0079 per
share, and $20,000 of CelLynx-California convertible notes with a conversion
price of $0.10 per share were converted into $20,000 of Company convertible
notes with a conversion price of approximately $0.0795 per
share. There were no CelLynx-California warrants issued and
outstanding at the time of the closing of the Exchange Agreement.
In
connection with the reverse take-over transaction, Palomar Ventures III, L.P.
(“Palomar”), holder of a certain amended and restated convertible promissory
note dated November 10, 2007 (the “Palomar Note”) executed by CelLynx-California
in the principal amount of $262,356.16, is entitled to convert the Palomar Note
into that number of shares of common stock of CelLynx-California such that
immediately following the closing of the reverse take-over transaction, the
Palomar Note would be convertible into 4.8% of the issued and outstanding common
stock of the Company, exclusive of unvested options. As a result, the
Palomar Note is convertible into 6,340,029 shares of the Company's common
stock.
As a
condition to closing the Exchange Agreement, John P. Thornton resigned as the
Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary
and Treasurer, and the following officers were appointed:
● |
Daniel
R. Ash, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and
Secretary;
|
|
● |
Kevin
Pickard, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer,
and
|
|
● |
Tareq
Risheq, Chief Strategy
Officer.
|
In
addition, Mr. Thornton agreed to resign as a director of the Company and Mr.
Ash, Mr. Risheq, Norman W. Collins, and Robert J. Legendre were appointed
directors of the Company. Mr. Ash’s appointment was effective
immediately. The appointment of the other directors became effective
on August 14, 2008, upon the Company’s compliance with the provisions of Section
14(f) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 14(f)-1
thereunder.
18
On
November 17, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Mr. Legendre
Executive Chairman of the Board to assist the Company’s Chief Executive Officer
with strategy and execution of the Company’s manufacturing and supply chain
operations, corporate development, capital markets and investor
relations. Mr. Legendre subsequently resigned on May 4,
2009.
On
December 12, 2008, Mr. Risheq resigned as the Company’s Chief Strategy Officer
but remains a director.
$1,575,000 Financing
Under the
Subscription Agreement, the Company issued 10,500,000 shares of its common stock
and warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase 10,500,000 shares of common stock at
an exercise price of $0.20 per share to the Investors for an aggregate purchase
price of $1,575,000, or $0.15 per share, payable in cash and through the
cancellation of debt. The proceeds from the Financing were allocated
as follows: $100,000 to pay current obligations of NorPac, $225,000 as
cancellation of current debt of NorPac and the remaining $1,250,000 for working
capital. The Warrants expire on July 22, 2010 except in the event
that at any time CelLynx has manufactured 25 or more of its mobile or home
repeater units, then the Company may, at its option, accelerate the expiry of
the Warrants by giving notice (“Notice of Acceleration”) to the holder
thereof. If the holder does not exercise the Warrant within 30 days
of the giving of the Notice of Acceleration, the Warrants will expire and the
holder will have no further rights to acquire any shares of the Company under
the Warrants.
Dollardex
Distribution Agreement
Under the
Distribution Agreement, Dollardex shall act as CelLynx’s exclusive distributor
of the CelLynx’s 5BARz™ products and related accessories (the “Products”) in the
following nine regions: Canada, South America, Europe, Middle East, China,
India, Australia, Africa, and South East Asia (the “Territory”). The
Distribution Agreement supersedes a prior Joint Venture Agreement, as amended,
dated January 3, 2008 entered into between the parties.
In
accordance with the terms of the Distribution Agreement, Dollardex will sell and
distribute the Products directly to resellers (whether wholesales or retailers)
or end users of the Products in the Territory as well as sell and distribute the
Products to its agents in the Territory (the “Dealers”). The Dealers
will be located and appointed by Dollardex but their appointment will be subject
to CelLynx’s approval.
In
accordance with the terms of the Distribution Agreement, CelLynx also granted
Dollardex an exclusive non-transferrable license to use the tradenames,
trademark, logos, and designations in or associated with the Products during the
term of the Distribution Agreement in connection with the promotion and
distribution of the Products in the Territory. The Distribution Agreement is
otherwise subject to customary intellectual property protections, including,
without limitation, all of the processes, know-how, and related material
proprietary of CelLynx to manufacture the Products.
The term
of the Distribution Agreement is perpetual though the Distribution Agreement may
be terminated, in the event of, among other events, a material breach,
upon a change of control of Dollardex, or by mutual agreement of the
parties. The Distribution Agreement further provides that CelLynx
shall have the exclusive right of first refusal to acquire Dollardex in the
event that Dollardex considers such transaction. In addition, effective December
31, 2011, CelLynx shall have the option to acquire Dollardex in accordance with
a certain appraisal method as further described in the Distribution
Agreement.
In
accordance with the terms of the Distribution Agreement, CelLynx and Dollardex,
prior to Dollardex entering into a contractual relationship with a Dealer or
commencing distribution of the Product in a given Territory, will develop a
business plan for deployment of the distribution and marketing of the Products
in the specific Territory. CelLynx will have approval rights over the
business plan and Dollardex is obligated to conduct business and ensure that
Dealers conduct their business substantially in accordance with the terms of the
business plan.
19
As
consideration for the rights granted under the Distribution Agreement, Dollardex
will provide funding to the Company as follows: (i) $1,000,000 due and payable
after the pilot production run for the first commercial Product is completed
(the “Initial Roll Out”); (ii) $4,000,000 due and payable 90 days from the
commencement of the Initial Roll Out; and (iii) $5,000,000 due and payable 180
days from the commencement of the Initial Roll Out. In addition, the
parties agreed that the Company will sell products to Dollardex at 10% over cost
of goods sold and Dollardex will pay the Company 50.1% of its Net Earning (as
defined in the Distribution Agreement) on a quarterly basis with payments to be
made within 45 days following the end of each quarter. The Company
has not received any payment under the agreement and we are currently
re-negotiating the agreement with Dollardex.
Lock-Up
Agreement
Under the
Lock-Up Agreement, Robert J. Legendre, Executive Chairman of the Board of
Directors of the Company, Daniel R. Ash, Chief Executive Officer
and a director of the Company, Tareq Risheq, Chief Strategy Officer and a
director of the Company, and Anthony DeMarco, a senior employee of the Company,
agreed not to transfer, sell, assign, pledge, hypothecate, give, create a
security interest in or lien on, place in trust (voting trust or otherwise), or
in any other way encumber or dispose of, directly or indirectly and whether or
not voluntarily, without express prior written consent of the Company, any
common stock or options to purchase common stock of the Company for a period of
24 months.
FY
2009 Events
On
November 7, 2008, CelLynx filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Articles of
Incorporation (the “Amendment”) with the Secretary of State of the State of
Nevada after shareholders approved a proposal to increase the number of
authorized shares of common stock of the Company from 100,000,000 to 400,000,000
by written consent in lieu of a special meeting of shareholders. As a
result of filing the Amendment, 45,516,034 shares of the Company’s Series A
Preferred Stock automatically converted into 45,516,034 shares of the Company’s
common stock. The Company now has 126,068,846 shares of common stock
and no shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.
On
November 17, 2008, CelLynx’s Board of Directors appointed Robert J. Legendre
Executive Chairman of the Board to assist the Company’s Chief Executive Officer
with strategy and execution of the Company’s manufacturing and supply chain
operations, corporate development, capital markets and investor
relations.
On
November 24, 2008, CelLynx announced that it had successfully reached a key
commercialization milestone with its manufacturing of the newly enhanced 5BARz™
Universal Unit. Initially envisioned as a plug-and-play mobile unit
to be used in vehicles, this product has also proven highly effective for
single-room coverage in a home or office. Accordingly, CelLynx plans
to introduce the Universal Unit with a 110 volt power cord for indoor use, as
well as with an accessory portable battery pack that can be used virtually
anywhere a weak cellular signal exists. The Universal Unit contrasts
with CelLynx’s 5BARz™ SOHO stationary table top unit which is designed to cover
a 2,000 square foot home or office space.
On
December 12, 2008, Tareq Risheq resigned as CelLynx’s Chief Strategy
Officer.
There
were no disagreements between Mr. Risheq and CelLynx regarding any matter
relating to CelLynx’s operations, policies, practices or
otherwise. Mr. Risheq remains a director of CelLynx.
20
Recent
Events
Ingram
Micro Agreement
In
November 2009, we signed an agreement with Ingram Micro Inc. to distribute the
line of mobile phone boosters. This agreement accelerates CelLynx
Group’s go-to-market channel strategy and expands the reach of its product
distribution to include all 50 states, D.C., U.S. Territories & Possessions,
as well as Military Bases and U.S. embassies abroad. Ingram Micro
Inc. is the world’s largest technology distributor and a leading technology
sales, marketing and logistics company. It offers a broad array of
solutions and services to more than 170,000 resellers by distributing and
marketing hundreds of thousands of IT products worldwide from more than 1,500
vendors. We expect to distribute our product through online
distributors and traditional retailers.
Changes
in Directors
On May 4,
2009, Robert Legendre, the Company’s Executive Chairman of the Board resigned as
a member of our board of directors to devote his full time to other career
responsibilities. There were no disagreements between Mr. Legendre
and any of our officers or directors.
Effective
May 8, 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors appointed Donald A. Wright, as
Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company. Additionally,
effective December 19, 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors appointed Dwayne
Yaretz as a Director of the Company. More information is provided
about Messrs. Wright and Yaretz below in the section “Directors, Executive
Officers, and Corporate Governance.”
Securities
Issuance Agreement
On May 4,
2009, the Company entered into a Securities Issuance Agreement, dated as of
April 23, 2009 (the "Agreement"), with Dollardex Group Corp., a Panamian
corporation (the "Purchaser") and Robert Legendre (“Mr. Legendre”) and Tareq
Risheq (“Mr. Risheq”). Pursuant to the Agreement, the Purchaser agreed to invest
$278,500 in the Company and would receive 2,785,000 shares of its common stock
(“Shares”) and warrants to purchase 2,785,000 Shares at an exercise price of
$0.10 per share. The warrants have a term of 36 months after the
issue date of May 5, 2009.
Under the
Agreement, we accepted the resignation of Mr. Legendre as Executive Chairman of
the Board of Directors of the Company (discussed above). The Company
agreed that all of Mr. Legendre’s options would be immediately
cancelled. As full compensation for his services to the Company to
date, he would receive 2,000,000 Shares of common stock. The Company
agreed that all of Mr. Risheq’s options would be immediately
cancelled. As full compensation for his services to the Company to
date, he would receive 1,500,000 Shares of common stock. As discussed
above, on December 12, 2008, Mr. Risheq had resigned as the Company’s Chief
Strategy Officer but remains a Director of the Company.
Convertible
Promissory Note Issued February 19, 2009
On
February 19, 2009, the Company issued to an unrelated third party, (1) an
unsecured convertible promissory note for an aggregate principal balance of
$75,000 with a conversion price of $0.20 per share, and (2) 37,500 shares of the
Company’s restricted common stock. The interest rate on the note is
4.0% per annum and had an original maturity date of March 31, 2009, which was
subsequently amended to May 31, 2009. The Company determined the
relative fair value of the convertible promissory note and the stock on the date
of issuance. The fair value of the stock was $4,246 which was
recorded as a debt discount and was amortized over the original maturity date
and included in financing expenses in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements. As of December 31, 2009, the promissory note was in
default for non-payment; however on January 12, 2010, the Company and the note
holder agreed to a settlement. The interest rate was adjusted to 15%
retroactive to the issuance date, and the principal and accrued interest for one
year would be settled for a cash payment of $25,000 and 765,625 shares of the
Company’s common stock.
21
Convertible
Promissory Note Issued March 3, 2009
On March
3, 2009, the Company issued an unsecured convertible promissory note to an
unrelated third party for an aggregate principal balance of $25,000 with a
conversion price of $0.20. The convertible promissory note was due on
April 30, 2009, and is non-interest bearing. However, the note was
subsequently amended to extend the due date to May 31, 2009. As of
December 31, 2009, the promissory note was in default for
non-payment. However, on January 12, 2010, the Company and the note
holder agreed to settle the principal balance for a cash payment of $12,500 and
156,250 shares of the Company’s common stock.
Stockholder
Note Issued February 4, 2009
On
February 4, 2009, the Company issued an unsecured convertible promissory note to
a related party for an aggregate principal amount of $43,000. The
convertible promissory note has a conversion price of $0.20. The
convertible promissory note was due on March 31, 2009, and was non-interest
bearing. However, the note was subsequently amended to extend the due
date to May 31, 2009, and to accrue interest from the inception of the note at a
rate of 4.0%. As of December 31, 2009, the promissory note was in
default for non-payment; however on January 5, 2010, the Company and the note
holder agreed to a settlement. The interest rate was adjusted to 15%
retroactive to the issuance date, and the principal and accrued interest for one
year would be settled for a cash payment of $25,000 and 305,625 shares of the
Company’s common stock.
Overview
of CelLynx
CelLynx
develops and markets the next generation of cell phone boosters (also known as
repeaters or amplifiers) for the small office, home office (“SOHO”) and
vehicle. This next generation product, CelLynx 5BARz™, is the first
consumer-friendly, single-piece unit that strengthens weak cellular signals to
deliver higher quality signals for voice, data and video reception on cell
phones being used indoors or in vehicles. CelLynx plans to
develop its products for use in North America, Europe and Asia. The
CelLynx product line is intended to be manufactured by contract manufacturers
located in South East Asia. These manufacturers will allow
CelLynx to capitalize on the full advantages of multiple manufacturing locations
with a trained and experienced technical work force, state of the art
facilities and knowledge of all aspects of supply chain management, operational
execution, global logistics and reverse logistics. The marketing and sales
functions will be handled in-house incorporating a multi-channel strategy that
includes distribution partners, wireless service providers, retail outlets and
international joint ventures.
The
CelLynx Solution
Most SOHO
cellular amplifiers currently on the market require a receiving tower or
antenna, usually placed in an attic or on a rooftop, and a transmitting tower or
antenna to be placed at least 35 feet from the other antenna with each connected
to the amplifier by cable. CelLynx’s patent pending technology
eliminates the need to distance the receiving and transmitting towers, allowing
the two towers to be placed directly inside the booster, resulting in a more
affordable, one piece unit sometimes referred to as ‘plug ‘n play’, i.e.
requiring no installation other than plugging the unit into a power
source.
CelLynx has
recently completed a prototype of the 5BARz SOHO Unit which delivers 45
decibel (dB) of gain in a Single Band PCS environment providing up to
1,500 square feet of indoor coverage. This unit measures 6.5 X
7.5 X 2.5 inches, weighs approximately one pound and does not require the
installation of antennas or cables in order to function. In
order to optimize marketability, CelLynx is developing an improved model
which it expects to operate in a dual band, PCS and Cellular, environment
delivering 65 dB of gain thereby allowing for coverage of 2,000 to 3,000
square feet. This dual band unit would work with all current
wireless carriers in the U.S. and Canada except Nextel, which
operates on its own frequency. The PCS network is generally used by the
older carriers such as AT&T at 850MHz while the newer carriers such as
T-Mobile operate on the Cellular network at 1900 MHz. Management is
confident that all of the critical functions required for this dual band
unit have been identified and that their engineering team has the
capability to accomplish development leading to
commercialization.
|
22
We
believe the CelLynx 5BARz product line, when commercialized, will also offer an
advantage over other amplifiers such as the Femtocell architecture being
developed by wireless service providers such as AT&T and
Verizon. This Femtocell technology requires a small cellular base
station which connects to the service provider’s network via a broadband such as
DSL or cable. As such, Femtocell will be carrier specific and subject
to a monthly subscription fee. CelLynx products, on the other hand,
will be compatible with all wireless carriers in the U.S. and
Canada (except Nextel), and will not require a broadband internet
connection and will not entail a monthly service fee.
CelLynx
has also developed a mobile 5BARz Universal Unit designed primarily for use in
vehicles, or for single-room coverage in the home or office. In
November, 2008, the Company announced it had manufactured 25 5BARz Universal
Unit production samples, reaching a key commercialization milestone. The 5BARz
Universal Unit is an adaptation of the 5BARz SOHO Unit described
above. The unit will produce up to 45 dB of gain offering higher
performance than the competition within the interior of a vehicle cabin or
single room, while minimizing the signal degrading effects of
cabling.
Initially
envisioned as a plug ‘n play mobile unit to be used in vehicles with a 12 volt
cigarette lighter power adapter, the 5BARz Universal Unit has also proven highly
effective for single-room coverage in a home or office. Accordingly, the Company
plans to introduce the 5BARz Universal Unit with a 110 volt power cord for
indoor single-room use, as well as with an accessory portable battery pack that
can be used virtually anywhere a weak signal exists. Using the 5BARz Universal
Unit with Bluetooth® extends the effective coverage range to that of the
Bluetooth® signal.
Our first
product, The Road Warrior, has passed FCC Certification and in July 2009, we
ordered 220 units from our manufacturer in the Philippines. We used
some of the units as demo units and started selling the
remainder. Due to cash flow issues, we recently placed an order for
an additional 1,000 units and have received the first 250 units in November
2009.
History
and Development of CelLynx
CelLynx
assembled a veteran engineering team with extensive cellular radio
frequency (RF) experience headquartered in Sacramento,
California. Within eight months, this team, with more than 80 years
of combined experience in building RF products, developed working prototypes of
an affordable consumer friendly single piece plug ‘n play booster with a minimum
of 45dB of gain in both up and down paths. By late 2007, a pre-production
prototype had been developed. At that time, CelLynx entered into a merger
agreement with NorPac Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation trading on the
Over The Counter Bulletin Board (OTC BB).
Since the
closing of the reverse take-over July 24, 2008, CelLynx has continued the
development of the 5BARz product line with both the 5BARz Universal Unit and
5BARz SOHO Unit on similar but separate development tracks. Concurrently,
management is focusing on the manufacturing process and implementation of a
sales and marketing plan to ensure the delivery of a quality low-cost product
into the market place. In 2008, the Company has raised $2 million in equity
capital, added executives to its board of directors and management team, and
opened a new corporate headquarters in Mission Viejo, California while
maintaining its R&D facility in El Dorado Hills, California.
23
The CelLynx 5BARz™ Product Line
5BARz
SOHO Unit
The 5BARz
SOHO Unit (small office, home office) is designed to eliminate
cell phone weak spots in an area similar to the size of a single family home
(2,000 to 3,000 square feet). Expected to retail at a competitive
price of about $299, the 5BARz SOHO Unit is lightweight, aesthetically pleasing
and designed to sit on a table near a window in the direction of the nearest
cell tower. There is an indicator light to determine the best
placement. This product requires no assembly: simply place the unit
on a table and plug in the power chord. Product introduction
has occured in July 2009 for the North American model. The
European and Asian models are expected to be introduced in mid
2010.
5BARz
Universal Unit
The 5BARz
Universal Unit is designed to eliminate cell phone weak spots primarily while in
a vehicle --moving or stationary -- as well as for single-room coverage in home,
office or hotel.
For
vehicles, simply place the unit on the dashboard and plug in the cigarette
lighter power adapter/cradle for handheld cell phone use, or place the cell
phone into the cradle for hands-free or Bluetooth® operation. This unit includes
a Bluetooth® speaker phone with caller ID. CelLynx technology is
designed to be superior to current vehicle solutions that require complex
installation including roof top mounting of the antenna and, in some cases, a
direct connection between the cell phone and the roof top antenna.
For
single-room home, office, or hotel room coverage, simply place the unit near a
window in the building, plug in the powerline and extend the antenna line for
handheld cell phone operation. Place the cell phone in the cradle for best
hands-free or Bluetooth® performance; use of a Bluetooth® device extends the
effective coverage to that of the Bluetooth® range.
The
Bluetooth® speaker phone with caller ID will offer the user the convenience of
hands free phone conversation while driving, which is mandated by law in many
areas including California, the nation’s largest automobile
market. This product is also expected to retail at a competitive
price of about $299 and to be introduced in North American in the first half of
2010. The European and Asian models are expected to be introduced
mid-year 2010.
5BARz
Product Launch
The 5BARz
product launch schedule is coordinated with the marketing plan to first
introduce the 5BARz SOHO Unit and 5BARz Universal Unit in the United States and
Canada, operating at the Cellular and PCS frequencies
(800/1900MHz). To allow for the marketing of the 5BARz products in
Europe and Asia, new models will be subsequently launched that are designed to
operate at the ETSI defined frequencies for GSM (900/1800MHz). The
development requirement for the new models is primarily limited to the tuning of
the U.S. based units for the change of frequency assignments, including
replacement of frequency sensitive components such as band pass filters and
antennas.
Industry
Overview
Given the
nature of the CelLynx product line, CelLynx is within the overall cellular
telephone market as well as two sub-segments of that market, i.e. the
in-building wireless systems marketplace and the vehicle amplifier
marketplace.
24
The
overall cellular telephone marketplace
Statistics
from the 3GSM World Congress in Barcelona, Spain this year indicate that the
number of worldwide mobile subscribers has surpassed the two billion mark and is
predicted to reach three billion by the end of this year and four billion by
2011. Demand for cellular applications beyond voice, such as video,
SMS, email and internet access have created a multi-billion dollar market for
accessorial cellular network products such as CelLynx amplifiers. “Certain user
segments have an almost insatiable appetite for connectivity and enhanced access
to critical productivity applications while at work, at home and on the move,”
according to Cliff Raskind, Strategy Analytics’ director of Wireless
Strategies. These early adopters are already driving the market for
products that will improve connectivity. Business users are twice as likely to
carry a mobile phone as a notebook when away from their desk and are keenly
interested in expanding email and internet access to the phone. This
increase in bandwidth demand on the cellular network decreases signal strength
and increases the need for CelLynx’s 5BARzo products.
In spite
of the overall proliferation of cell phones, the carriers themselves are
suffering from a high rate of customer defections sometimes referred to as
churn. According to CITA, The Wireless Association, 40% of those
customers switching networks are searching for a better signal. Considering that
it costs the average carrier almost $400 to acquire a new subscriber, this
global churn rate is the most serious problem affecting the cellular industry
and CelLynx is directly addressing this problem through improving indoor and
vehicle coverage while diminishing interference. It is also noteworthy that
according to First Research, a D & B Company providing Industry
Intelligence, 85% of the U.S. Wireless industry revenues are generated by the
four major wireless companies, AT&T, Verizon, Sprint and T-Mobile. In the
U.S. market, CelLynx will concentrate on adapting its products to the
frequencies being used by those carriers, in particular the Dual Band
850/1900MHz. In the International market, CelLynx will focus on the
Dual Band 900/1800MHz being used in Europe, Africa, Asia, Australia, New Zealand
and most of South America.
CelLynx
believes that all of the above market conditions indicate the potential for the
success of the CelLynx 5BARz product line within the general cell phone
market. The CelLynx products will seek to attract virtually all cell
phone users including those who will come by the product through their cellular
and Wi-MAX carriers, enterprise employers, government agencies or military
service organizations.
The
‘In Building’ wireless systems marketplace
According
to ABI Research, ‘In-building wireless systems, forecasted to exceed $15 billion
in revenues in 2013, are a key enabler for delivering on the potential of
cellular mobile services.’ Total Telecom,,a leading communications
periodical, reports that the role of the traditional office is no longer
essential for day-to-day productivity as people increasingly work wherever the
technology is available, generally at home if not in the
office. The U.S. Department of Labor reports that over 20 million
workers work at home and this does not include those who work out of a home
office to conduct personal business or those who work at home to finish
uncompleted tasks from their regular employment or use their home office for
outside or after hours employment. More and more workers are adopting
the trend toward work-life balance that results in them spending more time at
home. These factors reinforce the need for improved signal in the Small Office
Home Office. That need is expected to be met by the CelLynx 5BARz
SOHO Unit.
The
‘In-Vehicle’ wireless systems marketplace
Three
trends are noteworthy when discussing this sub sector: the growth of
the number of motor vehicles on the road, the trend indicating the increased
number of mobile workers and the trend toward legislation requiring hands free
cell phone operation while driving.
According
to Plunkett Research, Ltd. there were 806 million automobiles and light trucks
on the roads of the world in 2007. That number is expected to
increase to one billion by the year 2020. Not so surprisingly, predictions by
Analyst House IDC indicate that the number of mobile workers is set to reach
one billion by 2011. It is reasonable to assume that as the number of
vehicles increase and the number of cell phones increase that the number of
drivers using cell phones will also increase.
25
The
National Council of Legislators estimate that 73 % of drivers use their cell
phones in the car. That being the case, twenty states and dozens of
municipalities have passed legislation requiring hands free cell phone
usage while driving. Anticipating the continuation of this legislative trend,
the CelLynx vehicular 5BARz Universal Unit is equipped with Bluetooth® for hands
free, safe driving.
All of
the above trends suggest the need for quality voice, data and media solutions in
the mobile environment, and that the market for user friendly boosters such as
the CelLynx 5BARz Universal Unit will follow these trends in both growth and
application.
Sales
and Marketing Strategy
In the
US, CelLynx will deploy a multi-channel sales strategy seeking to
include: Distribution Partners such as Celluphone, QDI or Advantage; Stocking
Partners such as Tesco, Hutton & Brightstar; Cellular
Carriers such as AT&T & Verizon; Corporate Accounts such as Accenture,
IBM, Remax, Roadway & Hertz; Retail Outlets such as Radio Shack,
Comp USA & Best Buy and Web based direct sales.
CelLynx
will address the international market place through a Master Global Marketing,
Distribution and Service Agreement between CelLynx and Dollardex Group Corp.
(“DGC”). DGC intends to build an international marketing and
distribution dealer network through its existing relationships in its licensed
territories.
In
November 2009, we signed an agreement with Ingram Micro Inc. to distribute the
line of mobile phone boosters. This agreement accelerates CelLynx
Group’s go-to-market channel strategy and expands the reach of its product
distribution to include all 50 states, the District of Columbia, U.S.
Territories and Possessions, as well as Military Bases and U.S. embassies
abroad. Ingram Micro Inc. is the world’s largest technology
distributor and a leading technology sales, marketing and logistics
company. It offers a broad array of solutions and services to more
than 170,000 resellers by distributing and marketing hundreds of thousands of IT
products worldwide from more than 1,500 vendors. We expect to
distribute our product through online distributors and traditional
retailers.
Operating
and Manufacturing Strategy
CelLynx’s management
and engineering teams have extensive experience working with top-tier off shore
manufacturers. In fact, this collective team has successfully
launched over 150 complex RF products in the past seven years using off shore
manufacturers.
Given
their expertise in this area they have become acutely aware of the advantages of
partnering with a reputable contract manufacturer (CM). In this case,
CelLynx will immediately leverage manufacturing practices at minimal cost. In
fact, the team has identified several CM candidates in Southeast Asia. Once a CM
is selected, CelLynx will immediately benefit from multiple manufacturing
locations with a trained and experienced technical work force, state of the art
facilities and knowledge of all aspects of supply chain management, operational
execution, global logistics and reverse logistics.
CelLynx
has selected a CM in the Phillippines which produced the first 220 units in
coordination with the Company’s engineering team. The first initial
mass production units were used for UL testing, product
demonstrations, and remaining FCC approved units were sold as initial
sales..
Competition
by Market Segment
The SOHO
or residential wireless amplifier competitors; Most of the companies in
this industry do not offer plug ‘n play single-unit solutions such as
CelLynx. In fact, companies such as Wilson, Wi-Ex and CellAntenna,
offer two-piece, ‘cable connected amplifier-to-antenna’ solutions requiring
complex installation enabled only by tech savvy users or professional installers
and at considerably higher prices than CelLynx.
26
The
mobile vehicle market competitors; A few companies such as Digital Antenna and
Richardson (Call Capture) are focused on the vehicle market and others such as
Wilson are entering that market. Again, however, these vehicle
solutions require complex installation including roof top mounting of antenna
and, in some cases, a direct connection between the cell phone and the roof top
antenna.
The
Wireless enterprise solution providers as competitors; While the equipment
manufacturers in the enterprise market such as Wilson, EMS Wireless and
Radioframe Networks are attempting to enter the SOHO/residential market, their
products are engineered for commercial enterprises requiring complex
installation and as a result are expensive as compared to the CelLynx
solution.
While
each of the above competitors has solutions for certain market segments such as
large buildings and warehouses, there is no dominant market leader in the SOHO
and Vehicle segments of the Market. CelLynx believes that the total indoor and
vehicle cell signal amplification market, now exceeding $300 million annually,
could experience continued growth through the commercialization of products such
as those being offered by CelLynx. As compared to the current products in the
marketplace, CelLynx’s key sustainable competitive advantage is in its patent
pending technology providing for compact, plug ‘n play, consumer friendly and
affordable product lines. An overview of the competition is shown
below.
Competitive
Matrix
|
Wi-Ex
|
CellAntenna
|
JD
TECK
|
Wilson
|
CelLynx
|
YX500-PCS
|
CAE50PCS
|
JD
55-PR
|
PCS
60dB
|
||
Claimed
Coverage
|
2,500
sq. ft
|
3,000
sq ft
|
1,200
sq ft
|
2,500
sq ft
|
2,500
sq ft
|
Open
area
|
Open
area
|
||||
Adaptive/AGC
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Freq./Carrier
Specific
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Maximum
System Gain
|
55dB
|
50dB
|
55dB
|
60dB
|
70dB
|
Cable
Length/Type
|
35’
RG6
|
33’
RG6
|
33’
RG6
|
Buy
separately
|
None
Required
|
Market
|
Consumer
|
Industrial
|
Industrial
|
Industrial
|
Consumer
|
Distribution
|
Direct
|
Direct
|
Direct
|
Distributors
|
Direct
|
Master
VAR
|
(Online
(3rd
Party)
|
Master
VAR
|
Master
VAR
|
Distributors
|
|
Retail
|
Online
(3rd
Party)
|
Online
|
|||
Online
(3rd
Party)
|
|||||
Price
(MSRP)
|
$299.99
|
$499.99
|
$395.00
|
$699.95
|
$299.00
|
Installation:
|
Recommended
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
None
Required
|
Price
|
$150.00
|
>$300
|
$250
|
>$300
|
|
External
Antennae
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
Intellectual
Property
CelLynx
has trademark protection for the brand name “5BARz” and has applied for
trademark protection for its sales slogan, “Turning Weak Spots into Sweet
Spots.” CelLynx has the following patent applications
pending:
27
Matter
ID
|
Title
|
Matter
Type
|
Serial
Number
|
Status
|
101710.0001
P CT
|
Cell
Phone Signal Booster
|
Patent
– P CT
|
P
CT/US07/060827
|
Pending
|
101710.0001
US
|
Cell
Phone Signal Booster
|
Patent
– US
|
11/625331
|
Pending
|
101710.0001
US2
|
Dual
Cancellation Loop Wireless Repeater
|
Patent
– US
|
12/106468
|
Pending
|
101710.0002
PRO
|
Method
to Remotely Enable and Disable the Operation of a Wireless
Repeater
|
Patent
– Provisional
|
61/018765
|
Pending
|
101710.0003
PRO
|
Method
to Integrate a Wireless Repeater into the Wireless System for Control and
Monitoring
|
Patent
– Provisional
|
61/018892
|
Pending
|
101710.0004
PRO
|
Method
for a Wireless System Home Base Station
|
Patent
– Provisional
|
61/019097
|
Pending
|
101710.0005
PRO
|
Dual
Loop Active and Passive Repeater Antenna Isolation
Improvement
|
Patent
– Provisional
|
61/045662
|
Pending
|
The
CelLynx Technology
The plug
‘n play aspects of the CelLynx cellular booster demanded complex algorithms and
intuitive interfaces. Further complicating the challenge, the booster required a
full duplex linear amplifier providing up to 45db of gain in both RX and TX
paths and directional antennae with one inch of separation and 70db of isolation
between them. It further required an active feed-forward cancellation in both
the RX and TX links with real time correction and an active Automatic Gain
Control for both links running in sync with the active feed-forward
cancellation. Typically, a repeater simply boosts off the air cell
phone signals so operating performance of a repeater can be related to the
amount of boost reliability delivered by the repeater.
System
gain is the measure of boost in decibels or dB. The major obstacles
to reliable gain in a repeater are isolation and linearity. Linearity
is a function of the amplification in the active portion of the repeater.
Generally, the amplifiers in a repeater are designed to operate class A and the
usable output power is de-rated from the maximum output power by 10dB or 90%
below the saturated output of the amplifier. Isolation is the measure of
separation of the input from the output of the repeater. If the
separation is less than the system gain, the result will be similar to the
feedback screech heard when a microphone is placed too close to a loud
speaker. In practice, isolation has proven to be the Achilles heel of
repeaters because unlike linearity, improvements in isolation have proven to be
costly and unmanageable.
Traditionally
the low tech approaches to achieving the isolation necessary for adequate
repeater performance includes vertical and horizontal spacing of the two
antennae, as with a speaker and microphone. In most cases this
horizontal spacing requires approximately ten times the distance of vertical
spacing. CelLynx has used a high tech approach to deal with the
real world environment resulting in a superior product delivering high
performance. Not only did the team meet the challenge, but in the process they
developed a user friendly, affordable unit that is protected by five
pending patents.
Government
Regulation and Probability of Affecting Business
Our
products are subject to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Underwriter
Laboratories (UL) certifications. We will submit samples of our
products to both agencies according to our product development
process. We do not anticipate any difficulty in obtaining these
certifications for our products. The Company has already received FCC approval
for the Road Warrior.
In
addition, because we plan to market and sell our products in other countries,
importation and exportation regulations may impact our activities. A breach of
these laws or regulations may result in the imposition of penalties or fines,
suspension or revocation of licenses. We are not currently involved in any such
judicial or administrative proceedings and believe that we are in compliance
with all applicable regulations. Although it is impossible to predict
with certainty the effect that additional importation and exportation
requirements and other regulations may have on future earnings and operations,
we are presently unaware of any future regulations that may have a material
effect on our financial position, but cannot rule out the
possibility.
28
Compliance
with Environmental Laws
CelLynx
is not required to comply with any environmental laws that are particular to the
cellular amplifier industry. However, it is Company policy to be
environmentally conscience in every aspect of our operations.
Employees
CelLynx
has approximately six (6) full-time employees. In addition, we have
hired several consultants to assist with development of our cellular amplifier
units. CelLynx is not affiliated with any union or collective
bargaining agreement. There have been no adverse labor incidents or
work stoppages in the history of CelLynx. Management believes that its
relationship with its employees is good.
PROPERTIES
We lease
office space in Mission Viejo, California at 25910 Acero, Suite 370, Mission
Viejo, California 92691. The facility is our primary operating
offices and headquarters. The facility is approximately 2,120 square
feet. On August 26, 2008, the Company entered into an eighteen-month
lease for office space for its Mission Viejo, California, office beginning on
October 1, 2008. The lease requires monthly payments of
$4,664. The Mission Viejo lease term was amended and extended to
April 30, 2012 with monthly payments of $3,710 commencing on May 1, 2010,
thereafter increasing to $3,816 on May 1, 2011.
We also
lease office space in El Dorado Hills, California at 5047 Robert J Mathews
Parkway, Suite 400, El Dorado Hills, California 95762. This facility is used for
research, development and engineering. The facility is approximately
1,570 square feet. The lease has a one-year term that expires March 31, 2010 and
the monthly base rent is $2,198.
We
believe that the foregoing facilities are sufficient for our operational
needs.
We do not
anticipate investing in real estate or interests in real estate, real estate
mortgages, or securities of or interests in persons primarily engaged in real
estate activities. We currently have no formal investment policy, and we do not
intend to undertake investments in real estate as a part of our normal
operations.
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
We are
not currently involved in any material legal proceedings, nor have we been
involved in any such proceedings that have had or may have a significant effect
on the Company. We are not aware of any other material legal proceedings pending
against us.
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation.
FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS
The
following discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial
condition for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and subsequent
interim periods, should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and
the notes to those financial statements that are included in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009. Our discussion includes
forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks
and uncertainties, such as our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions.
Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of
factors. We use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,”
“continuing,” “ongoing,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “may,” “will,” “should,”
“could,” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. Readers
are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements,
which speak only as of the date hereof. Except as required by law, we do not
undertake any obligation to update or keep current either (i) any
forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances arising after the
date of such statement, or (ii) the important factors that could cause our
future results to differ materially from historical results or trends, results
anticipated or planned by us, or which are reflected from time to time in any
forward-looking statement.
29
Overview
On July
24, 2008, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of CelLynx-California in
exchange for the issuance by us of 32,454,922 restricted shares of our common
stock to the CelLynx Owners, which represented approximately 40.3% of our-issued
and outstanding common stock (including the shares issued in the Financing), and
45,516,034 restricted shares of our Preferred Stock, which automatically convert
into 45,516,034 shares of our common stock upon the filing of a Certificate of
Amendment to the our Articles of Incorporation increasing the number of
authorized common stock to at least 150,000,000 shares. As a result of this
reverse merger transaction, CelLynx-California became our wholly owned
subsidiary, and then we acquired the business and operations of
CelLynx-California.
Just
prior to the closing of the share exchange transaction, on July 23, 2008, we
raised $1,575,000 in a private placement by issuing 10,500,000 shares of our
common stock and warrants to purchase 10,500,000 shares of our common stock at
an exercise price of $0.20 per share to investors. See Item
1.01 of our Form 8-K filed on July 30, 2008 for additional details regarding
this equity financing.
We are a
producer of the next generation of cell phone boosters (also known as repeaters
or amplifiers) for the small office, home office (SOHO) and
vehicle. This next generation product line, CelLynx 5BARz™ , uses our
patent pending technology to create a single-piece plug ‘n play unit that
strengthens weak cellular signals to deliver higher quality signals for voice,
data and video reception on cell phones and other cellular devices being used
indoors or in vehicles.
Our first
product, The Road Warrior, has passed FCC Certification and in July 2009, we
ordered 220 units from our manufacturer in the Philippines. We used
66 of the units as demo units and started selling the remainder. Due
to cash flow issues, we just recently placed an order for an additional 1,000
units and have received the first 250 units in November 2009.
We have
recently completed a prototype SOHO Unit which delivers 70 decibel (dB) of gain
in a Single Band PCS environment providing up to 2,500 square feet of indoor
coverage. We plan to commercialize this technology, with production
and distribution scheduled to begin, in the fourth quarter of 2010. This unit
measures 6.5 X 7.5 X 2.5 inches, weighs approximately one pound and does not
require the installation of antennas or cables in order to
function. Most SOHO cellular amplifiers currently on the market
require a receiving tower or antenna, usually placed in an attic or on a
rooftop, and a transmitting tower or antenna to be placed at least 35 feet from
the other antenna with each connected to the amplifier by cable. Our
patent pending technology is designed to eliminate the need to distance the
receiving and transmitting towers, allowing the two towers to be placed directly
inside the amplifier, resulting in a more affordable, one piece unit sometimes
referred to as ‘plug ‘n play’, i.e., requiring no installation other than
plugging the unit into a power source. In order to optimize marketability, we
are developing an improved model which is expected to operate in a dual band,
PCS and Cellular, environment delivering 65 dB of gain thereby allowing for
coverage of 2,500 to 3,000 square feet. This dual-band unit would work
with all current wireless carriers except Nextel which operates on its own
frequency. The PCS network is generally used by the older carriers such as
AT&T at 850MHz, while the newer carriers such as T-Mobile operate on the
Cellular network at 1900 MHz. Management is confident that all of the
critical functions required for this dual-band unit have been identified and
that their engineering team has the capability to complete development leading
to commercialization.
Our
product line is being manufactured by contract manufacturers located in the
Philippines, with whom CelLynx has established manufacturing and supply chain
relationships. These manufacturers allow us to capitalize on
the full advantages of multiple manufacturing locations with a trained and
experienced technical work force, state-of-the-art facilities and knowledge
of all aspects of supply chain management, operational execution, global
logistics and reverse logistics. The marketing and sales functions will be
handled in house incorporating a multi-channel strategy that includes
distribution partners, wireless service providers, retail outlets and
international joint ventures.
30
In November 2009, we signed an agreement with Ingram Micro Inc. to distribute the line of mobile phone boosters. This agreement accelerates CelLynx Group’s go-to-market channel strategy and expands the reach of its product distribution to include all 50 states, D.C., U.S. Territories & Possessions, as well as Military Bases and U.S. embassies abroad. Ingram Micro Inc. is the world’s largest technology distributor and a leading technology sales, marketing and logistics company. It offers a broad array of solutions and services to more than 170,000 resellers by distributing and marketing hundreds of thousands of IT products worldwide from more than 1,500 vendors. We expect to distribute our product through online distributors and traditional retailers.
Results
of Operations
Comparison
of the Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Year
ended September 30
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
|||||||||||||
REVENUE
|
$ | 10,373 | $ | - | 10,373 | 100.0% | ||||||||||
COST
OF REVENUE
|
7,554 | - | 7,554 | 100.0% | ||||||||||||
GROSS
PROFIT
|
2,819 | - | 2,819 | 100.0% | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
3,635,153 | 4,706,037 | (1,070,884 | ) | -22.8% | |||||||||||
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
(346,428 | ) | (1,952,499 | ) | 1,606,071 | -82.3% | ||||||||||
NET
LOSS
|
$ | (3,978,762 | ) | $ | (6,658,536 | ) | $ | 2,679,774 | -40.2% |
Revenue
and Cost of Revenue
During
the year ended September 30, 2009, we generated $10,373 in revenue that arose
from the initial sale of our 5Barz units which became sellable in July
2009. Cost of revenues were $7,554 resulting in a gross profit of
$2,819. During the same period of 2008, we were in development
stage and did not recognize any revenues, cost of revenues, and gross
profit.
Operating
Expenses
Total
operating expenses incurred for the year ended September 30, 2009 was $3,635,153
compared to $4,706,037 for the year ended September 30, 2008, which decreased by
$1,070,884. The significant decrease was due to a significant
decrease in share based compensation. During the year ended September
30, 2008, we recognized $2,625,106 of share based compensation expense compared
to $690,353 for the year ended September 30, 2009, for a decrease of $1,934,753
or 73.7%. The decrease is due to the cancellation of 35,734,111
options during the year and only granted 9,546,081 options. We also
had an increase in consulting fees of $411,715 from $563,151 for the year ended
September 30, 2008 to $974,866 for the year ended September 30, 2009, for a
73.1% increase. We incurred additional operating expenses as we
continued to build our infrastructure.
Non
Operating Income and Expenses
Total
non-operating income expenses incurred for the year ended September 30, 2009 was
$346,428 compared to $1,952,499 for the year ended September 30, 2008 which was
a decrease of $1,606,071. The difference was due to a beneficial
conversion liability which was expensed in the year ended September 30, 2008
offset by increased fair value of warrants for the year ended September 30, 2009
which were issued in 2008.
31
Comparison of the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
Three
months ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
|||||||||||||
REVENUE
|
$ | 11,820 | $ | - | 11,820 | 100.0% | ||||||||||
COST
OF REVENUE
|
9,559 | - | 9,559 | 100.0% | ||||||||||||
GROSS
PROFIT
|
2,261 | - | 2,261 | 100.0% | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
788,884 | 773,340 | 15,544 | 2.0% | ||||||||||||
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
(47,879 | ) | (218,203 | ) | 170,324 | -78.1% | ||||||||||
NET
LOSS
|
$ | (834,502 | ) | $ | (991,543 | ) | $ | 157,041 | -15.8% |
Revenue
and Cost of Revenue
During
the three months ended December 31, 2009, we generated net $11,820 in revenue
that arose from the initial sale of our 5Barz units which became sellable in
July 2009. Cost of revenues was $9,559 resulting in a gross profit of
$2,261. During the same period of 2008, we were in development stage
and did not recognize any revenues, cost of revenues, or gross
profit.
Operating
Expenses
Total
operating expenses incurred for the three months ended December 31, 2009, was
$788,884 compared to $773,340 for the three months ended December 31, 2008,
which increased by $15,544. The increase was due to an increase in
professional fees of $160,000, offset by a decrease in research and development
expenses and payroll related expenses, as we continued to build our
infrastructure.
Non
Operating Income and Expenses
Total
non-operating expenses incurred for the three months ended December 31, 2009,
was $47,879 compared to $218,203 for the three months ended December 31, 2008,
for a decrease of $170,324. The decrease was due to the change in
fair value of the accrued beneficial conversion liability and the change in fair
value of the accrued warrant liability. During the three months ended
December 31, 2008, we recognized a gain of $251,410 related to the accrued
beneficial conversion liability and we recognized a loss of $419,571 related to
the accrued warrant liability. During the three months ended December
31, 2009, we did not have any accrued warrant or beneficial conversion
liabilities. Interest and financing costs were $47,879 and $50,042
for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Financial
Condition
As of
December 31, 2009, we had cash of $28,316 and we had a working capital deficit
of $1,198,457, compared to cash of $6,776 and a working capital deficit of
$1,024,034 as of September 30, 2009. The increase in working capital
deficit is due an increase in accrued expense as we continue to build our
infrastructure.
32
During
the three months ended December 31, 2009, cash used in operating activities was
$584,085. Cash used in operating activities consisted of a net loss
of $834,502 offset by non cash expenses of $10,000 for stock issued for
services, $13,822 for warrants issued for services, $170,182 for stock based
compensation, $29,895 for the amortization of debt discount, and an increase of
$45,021 for change in accounts payable and accrued expenses. These
were offset by an increase in accounts receivable and inventory of $6,171 and
$27,238, respectively.
We used
$1,575 for the purchase of intangible assets for the three months ended December
31, 2009 compared to $12,018 purchase of equipment and intangible assets for the
three months ended December 31, 2008.
Cash
provided by financing activities was $607,200 for the three months ended
December 31, 2009 compared to $0 for the three months ended December 31,
2008. We received $618,200, less offering costs of $10,800 associated
with the common stock, for the three months ended December 31,
2009. We have financed our operations primarily through proceeds from
the issuance of common stock.
We
anticipate raising an additional $1 million during the next four to six months
through private equity offerings. We believe that our current
cash, anticipated cash flow from operations, and net proceeds from the private
placement financing will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs,
including our cash needs for working capital and capital
expenditures.
Contractual
Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Contractual
Obligations
We have
certain fixed contractual obligations and commitments that include future
estimated payments. Changes in our business needs, cancellation provisions,
changing interest rates, and other factors may result in actual payments
differing from the estimates. We cannot provide certainty regarding the timing
and amounts of payments. We have presented below a summary of the most
significant assumptions used in our determination of amounts presented in the
tables, in order to assist in the review of this information within the context
of our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
The
following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31 2009,
and the effect these obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash
flows in future periods.
Contractual
obligations
|
Total
|
Less
than 1
year
|
1-3
years
|
|||||||||
Note
Payable
|
$ | 264,364 | $ | 264,364 | $ | - | ||||||
Stockholder
notes
|
103,000 | 103,000 | - | |||||||||
Operating
lease
|
110,898 | 53,098 | 57,800 | |||||||||
$ | 478,262 | $ | 420,462 | $ | 57,800 |
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We have
not entered into any other financial guarantees or other commitments to
guarantee the payment obligations of any third parties. We have not entered into
any derivative contracts that are indexed to our shares and classified as
stockholder’s equity or that are not reflected in our financial
statements. Furthermore, we do not have any retained or contingent
interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity that serves as
credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity. We do not have any
variable interest in any unconsolidated entity that provides financing,
liquidity, market risk or credit support to us or engages in leasing, hedging or
research and development services with us.
33
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our
management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires
us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements as well as the reported net sales and expenses
during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and
assumptions. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other
factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
While our
significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 to our
financial statements, we believe that the following accounting policies are the
most critical to aid you in fully understanding and evaluating this management
discussion and analysis.
Intangible
Assets
Acquired
patents, licensing rights and trademarks are capitalized at their acquisition
cost or fair value. The legal costs, patent registration fees, and models and
drawings required for filing patent applications are capitalized if they relate
to commercially viable technologies. Commercially viable technologies are those
technologies that are projected to generate future positive cash flows in the
near term. Legal costs associated with applications that are not determined to
be commercially viable are expensed as incurred. All research and development
costs incurred in developing the patentable idea are expensed as incurred. Legal
fees from the costs incurred in successful defense to the extent of an evident
increase in the value of the patents are capitalized.
Capitalized
costs for patents are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining
twenty-year legal life of each patent after the costs have been incurred. Once
each patent or trademark is issued, capitalized costs are amortized on a
straight-line basis over a period not to exceed 20 years and 10 years,
respectively. The licensing right is amortized on a straight-line
over a period of 10 years.
Impairment
or Disposal of Long-lived Assets
The
Company applies the provisions of ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant, and
Equipment,” which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the
impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. ASC 360 requires impairment losses
to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of
impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated
by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amounts. In that event, a
loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the
fair value of the long-lived assets. Loss on long-lived assets to be disposed of
is determined in a similar manner, except that fair values are reduced for the
cost of disposal. Based on its review, the Company believes that as of December
31, 2009, and September 30, 2009, there was no significant impairment of its
long-lived assets.
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company's revenue recognition policies are in compliance with ASC Topic 605,
“Revenue Recognition.” Revenue is recognized at the date of shipment
to customers, and when the price is fixed or determinable, the delivery is
completed, no other significant obligations of the Company exist and
collectability is reasonably assured.
Income
Taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income
Taxes.” ASC 740 requires a company to use the asset and liability method of
accounting for income taxes, whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for
deductible temporary differences, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized
for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences
between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases.
Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of
management, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of, the
deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on
the date of enactment.
34
Under ASC
740, a tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than
not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax
examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount
of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination.
For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is
recorded. The adoption had no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
Stock
Based Compensation
The
Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718,
“Compensation – Stock Compensation.” ASC 718 requires companies to
measure compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation at fair value at
the grant date and recognize the expense over the employee’s requisite service
period. Under ASC 718, the Company’s volatility is based on the historical
volatility of the Company’s stock or the expected volatility of similar
companies. The expected life assumption is primarily based on historical
exercise patterns and employee post-vesting termination behavior. The risk-free
interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury
yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
In June
2008, FASB issued ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging,” which provides a
two-step model to determine whether a financial instrument or an embedded
feature is indexed to an issuer’s own stock and thus able to qualify for the
scope exception in ASC 815-10-15-74. This standard is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. This standard triggers liability accounting on all instruments
and embedded features exercisable at strike prices denominated in any currency
other than the functional currency of the operating entity. The
adoption of this pronouncement did not have an impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
In
October 2009, the FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) regarding
accounting for own-share lending arrangements in contemplation of convertible
debt issuance or other financing. This ASU requires that at the date
of issuance of the shares in a share-lending arrangement entered into in
contemplation of a convertible debt offering or other financing, the shares
issued shall be measured at fair value and be recognized as an issuance cost,
with an offset to additional paid-in capital. Further, loaned shares are
excluded from basic and diluted earnings per share unless default of the
share-lending arrangement occurs, at which time the loaned shares would be
included in the basic and diluted earnings-per-share
calculation. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning on or
after December 15, 2009, and interim periods within those fiscal years for
arrangements outstanding as of the beginning of those fiscal years. The Company
is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial
statements.
On December 15, 2009, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2010-06 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic 820 “Improving
Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.” This ASU requires some
new disclosures and clarifies some existing disclosure requirements about fair
value measurement as set forth in Codification Subtopic 820-10. The FASB’s
objective is to improve these disclosures and, thus, increase the transparency
in financial reporting. The adoption of this ASU will not have a
material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
35
DISAGREEMENTS
WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
As
previously reported by the Company in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
January 7, 2010, On January 4, 2010, the Company was notified that, effective
January 1, 2010, certain partners of Moore Stephens Wurth Frazer and Torbet, LLP
(“MSWFT”) and Frost, PLLC (“Frost”) formed Frazer Frost, LLP (“Frazer Frost”), a
new partnership. Pursuant to the terms of a combination agreement by and among
MSWFT, Frazer Frost and Frost (the “Combination Agreement”), each of MSWFT and
Frost contributed all of their assets and certain of their liabilities to Frazer
Frost, resulting in Frazer Frost assuming MSWFT’s engagement letter with the
Company and becoming the Company’s new independent accounting
firm. Frazer Frost is registered with the Public Company Accounting
and Oversight Board (PCAOB).
The Company had engaged MSWFT on
October 29, 2008. The audit report of MSWFT on the Company’s
financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, did not
contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, other than for a going
concern, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or
accounting principles.
Since the engagement of MSWFT on
October 29, 2008, and through January 1, 2010, the Company did not consult with
Frazer Frost on (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified
transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that may
be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, and Frazer Frost did not
provide either a written report or oral advice to the Company that was an
important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any
accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue; or (ii) the subject of any
disagreement, as defined in Item 304 (a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the
related instructions, or a reportable event within the meaning set forth in Item
304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
Since the engagement of MSWFT on
October 29, 2008, and through January 1, 2010, there were: (i) no disagreements
between the Company and MSWFT on any matters of accounting principles or
practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures,
which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of MSWFT, would have
caused MSWFT to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in
their reports on the Company’s financial statements for such years, and (ii) no
reportable events within the meaning set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of
Regulation S-K.
The Company’s Board of Directors
approved the engagement of Frazer Frost as the Company’s independent
auditor.
The Company provided MSWFT a copy of
the disclosures in the Form 8-K and requested that MSWFT furnish it with a
letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether or
not MSWFT agrees with the Company’s statements. A copy of the letter dated
January 7, 2010, furnished by MSWFT in response to that request was filed as
Exhibit 16.1 to the January 7, 2010, Form 8-K.
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not
applicable.
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Executive
Officers and Directors
Our
current directors and executive officers, their ages, their respective offices
and positions, and their respective dates of election or appointment are as
follows:
36
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
Date
of Appointment
|
|||
Daniel
R. Ash
|
48
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Secretary and
Director
|
July
24, 2008
|
|||
Kevin
Pickard
|
46
|
Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer (2)
|
July
24, 2008
|
|||
Tareq
Risheq (1)
|
45
|
Director
|
July
24, 2008
|
|||
Norman
W. Collins
|
69
|
Director
|
July
24, 2008
|
|||
Don
Wright
|
58
|
Chairman
of the Board
|
May
8, 2009
|
|||
Dwayne
Yaretz
|
49
|
Director
|
December
19, 2009
|
(1)
|
Tareq
Risheq resigned as Chief Strategy Officer on December 12,
2008. Mr. Risheq remains a director of the
Company.
|
(2)
|
Mr.
Pickard is an outside consultant providing services commonly provided by a
Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer.
|
Daniel
R. Ash – President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Secretary
and Director
Daniel R.
Ash currently serves as a Director, President and Chief Executive
Officer. Since July of 2006 he has devoted his full time efforts to
the development of CelLynx and its products. Mr. Ash has more than 20 years
experience in the wireless industry with senior management roles in new product
development, engineering, off-shore manufacturing and global
operations.
From 1999
to 2006 Mr. Ash held senior positions at Powerwave Technologies, a manufacturer
of RF amplifiers and antennae, and was instrumental in its growth from $200M to
more than $800M annual revenues. From 1991 to 1999, Mr. Ash held senior
positions with Hewlett Packard and was responsible for the transfer of RF cell
phone amplifier modules to high volume production in Malaysia ramping production
to over one million amplifiers per month.
Early in
his career, Mr. Ash worked in the electronic defense industry for Teledyne
Microwave and Narda Microwave. He worked on several missile projects and was
considered by many to be one of the industry experts in millimeter wave
electronics.
Tareq
Risheq – Director
Tareq
Risheq currently serves as a Director and formerly served as the Company’s Chief
Strategy Officer. He has over 20 years experience in the Consumer
Electronics and Information Technology industries. Mr. Risheq founded
Simpliciti Corporation, where, from 2002 to 2004, he took a PDA product from
concept to volume manufacturing and nationwide distribution to major
retailers. Simpliciti was featured in the Wall Street Journal as well
as most of the other national media outlets. Mr. Risheq also established a
direct sales organization in Saudi Arabia and grew that firm to $30M in revenues
within three years. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in
Business/Management from Bradley University. Mr. Risheq resigned as
Chief Strategy Officer on December 12, 2008. Mr. Risheq remains a
director.
37
Kevin
Pickard – Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Outside Consultant)
Since 1998,
Mr. Pickard has been a principal officer and owner of Pickard & Green
CPAs (formerly Pickard & Company, CPAs, P.C.), an accounting firm formed by
Mr. Pickard that specializes in providing SEC accounting and other
management consulting services for small to medium sized companies, including
preparing required SEC filings for public companies, due diligence on potential
acquisitions, preparing projections and business plans, assisting with
restructuring of companies, and positioning companies for initial public
offerings. Mr. Pickard was a Partner with Singer Lewak Greenbaum
& Goldstein, LLP, from 1996 to 1998, where he co-managed the
firm’s securities practice group. Mr. Pickard also spent over nine years
with Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P. (currently PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP),
where he focused on the auditing companies in the insurance, high-tech and
manufacturing industries. Mr. Pickard holds Bachelors of Science
and Masters degrees in Accounting from Brigham Young University.
Norman
W. Collins – Director
Norman W.
Collins, Sr. is an independent Director who was appointed upon the completion of
the merger between CelLynx, Inc. and NorPac. Since June of 2003, Mr.
Collins has been Director and President of Collins & Associates, a Delaware
corporation providing consulting services to corporations as well as legal
services in the form of Mediation and Arbitration of corporate
disputes. He is admitted to the Tennessee Bar and is a Certified
Mediator and Arbitrator in Georgia and a Certified Mediator in North Carolina
and the District of Columbia. Between 2003 and 2007 Mr. Collins also
served as the Executive Director of the Living Memorial Tree Foundation, a New
York non-profit organization dedicated to the creation of a memorial to the
victims of 9/11. Since May of 2006, Mr. Collins has also served as Director and
CEO of Upgrade International, a Washington technology
corporation. Prior positions include Director and CEO of several
non-reporting companies either in the development stage or with revenues
exceeding $30 Million.
Mr.
Collins holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Trine
University and a Juris Doctor degree from Michigan State University, College of
Law.
Don
Wright – Chairman of the Board
Mr.
Wright is currently the CEO of Confluence Capital Group, a firm that provides
business consulting services to institutional investors and companies including:
raising capital, capital restructuring, business and marketing plans, reporting
systems and metrics for stakeholders and management. He also serves on the board
of International Stem Cell Corporation (OTCBB: ISCO). Mr. Wright was Chief
Executive Officer and President of Pacific Aerospace & Electronics, Inc., an
engineering and manufacturing company that he helped to found and that designs,
manufactures and sells components primarily for the aerospace, defense and
transportation industries, from 1995 until 2006.
Dwayne
Yaretz – Director
Mr.
Yaretz been involved with numerous privately held companies in various industry
sectors to capitalize, manage growth strategies and operate as going concerns in
North America over the past 26 years. Internationally, Mr. Yaretz has acted as
Vice-President for Asia Power Engineering and China Power Corporation, both Hong
Kong based companies specializing in design, construction and operations in the
energy co-generation sector in the Peoples’ Republic of China. Since
1996 Mr. Yaretz has acted for several public companies in various capacities.
Mr. Yaretz has served as a Director, Corporate Secretary, CFO as well a
President and CEO of several private and public companies, including two Capital
Pool Companies that have successfully completed Qualifying Transactions by way
of an IPO. Currently, Mr. Yaretz in President of Griffin Corporate
Concepts, a consulting firm focused on partnering with companies that are
positioned for high growth potential in international markets. Mr.
Yaretz is currently a Director of Cantronic Systems Inc., a Tier 1 TSX.V listed
company and Benzai Capital Ltd., a Capital Pool Company listed on the
TSX.V. In addition, Mr. Yaretz is also a Director of PAKIT Inc., a
technology company and leading designer, developer and supplier of cellulose
fiber moulding equipment to the packaging industry.
38
Family
Relationships
There are
no family relationships among our directors and executive
officers.
Involvement
in Certain Legal Proceedings
Except as
provided below, none of our directors or executive officers has, during the past
five years:
(a) Has had a
petition under the federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law filed by
or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a
court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which
he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing,
or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer
at or within two years before the time of such filing;
(b) Been
convicted in a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a pending criminal
proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);
(c) Been the
subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended
or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily
enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following
activities:
● |
Acting
as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading
advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction
merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an
investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an
affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank,
savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or
continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such
activity;
|
||
● |
Engaging
in any type of business practice; or
|
||
● |
Engaging
in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or
commodity or in connection with any violation of federal or state
securities laws or federal commodities
laws;
|
(d) Been the
subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended
or vacated, of any federal or state authority barring, suspending or otherwise
limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any
activity described in paragraph I(i) above, or to be associated with persons
engaged in any such activity;
(e) Been found by
a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commission to have
violated any federal or state securities law, and the judgment in such civil
action or finding by the Commission has not been subsequently reversed,
suspended, or vacated; and
(f) Been found by
a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission to have violated any federal commodities law, and the
judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or
vacated.
In
January 2008, Mr. Pickard became interim President of Universal Guardian
Holding, Inc. (“UGH”) to assist the Board of Directors in disposing of UGH’s
assets to repay UGH’s bondholders. UGH was not successful in selling
its assets and on June 23, 2008, the Board of Directors elected to voluntarily
file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection.
39
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Based
solely upon a review of the copies of such forms furnished to the Company, or
written representations that no reports were required, we believe that for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, beneficial owners complied with
Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them.
Code
of Ethics
We have
not adopted a code of ethics, but we plan on adopting a code of ethics that
applies to all directors, officers, and employees, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and members of the board of directors in
the near future.
Material
Changes to the Procedures by which Security Holders May Recommend Nominees to
the Board of Directors
There
have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may
recommend nominees to the Board of Directors.
Board
Committees; Director Independence
In
November 2008, our board of directors appointed Norman W. Collins to serve as a
member of our audit committee, although he does not qualify as an “audit
committee financial expert.” Our board of directors has yet to
appoint a compensation committee. The functions ordinarily handled by
a compensation committee are currently handled by our entire board of directors.
Our board of directors intends, however, to review our governance structure and
institute board committees as necessary and advisable in the future to
facilitate the management of our business.
Our board
of directors consists of one independent director, Mr. Norman W. Collins, and
four non-independent directors. We have determined independence in accordance
with definitions and criteria applicable under the NASDAQ rules.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No
interlocking relationship exists between our board of directors and the board of
directors or compensation committee of any other company, nor has any
interlocking relationship existed in the past.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Summary
of Compensation
Executive
Compensation
The
following summary compensation table reflects all compensation for fiscal years
2007 and 2008 received by our predecessor’s principal executive officer and two
most highly compensated executive officers whose salary exceeded
$100,000.
40
Summary
Compensation Table – Predecessor
Name
and
Principal
Position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
|
Nonquali-fied
Deferred
Compen-sation
Earnings
($)
|
All
Other
Compen-sation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
||||||||||
John
P. Thornton, Former President,
CEO, CFO, Secretary and Treasurer
|
2009
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
||||||||||
2008
|
12,000
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
12,000
|
The
following summary compensation table reflects all compensation for fiscal years
2007 and 2008 received by CelLynx’s principal executive officer and two most
highly compensated executive officers whose salary exceeded
$100,000.
Summary
Compensation Table – CelLynx
Name
and Principal Position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Stock
Awards
(
$)
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compens-ation
($)
|
Non-quali-fied
Deferred
Compen-sation
Earnings
($)
|
All
Other
Comp
-ensation
(
$)
|
Total
($)
|
|||||||||
Daniel
R. Ash, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer
Secretary and Director
|
2009
|
170,000
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
170,000
|
|||||||||
2008
|
170,000
|
--
|
--
|
217,671
|
(2)
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
387,671
|
|||||||||
Tareq
Risheq, Chief Strategy Officer and Director (3)
|
2009
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
|||||||||
2008
|
108,000
|
--
|
--
|
159,330
|
(2)
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
267,330
|
41
(1) | The value of the stock award was determined based on the fair market value of the services performed. |
(2) |
The
Company used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value the
options. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of
options granted are as follows:
|
Expected
life (years): 2.5 – 3.5
Risk-free
interest rate: 2.37% -- 4.05%
Expected
volatility: 100%
Expected
dividend yield: 0%
(3) | Mr. Risheq resigned as Chief Strategy Officer on December 12, 2008. |
Outstanding
Equity Awards
The
following table sets forth certain information concerning stock and granted to
our named executive officers.
OUTSTANDING
EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
|
|||||||||||||||||||
OPTION
AWARDS
|
STOCK
AWARDS
|
||||||||||||||||||
Name
|
Number
of securities underlying unexercised options (#)
Exercisable
|
Number
of securities underlying unexercised options (#)
Unexercisable
|
Equity
Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities underlying unexercised
unearned options (#)
|
Option
exercise price ($)
|
Option
expiration date
|
Number
of shares or units of stock that have not vested (#)
|
Market
value of shares or units of stock that have not vested ($)
|
Equity
incentive plan awards: number of unearned shares, units or other rights
that have not vested (#)
|
Equity
incentive plan awards: Market or payout value of unearned shares, units or
other rights that have not vested ($)
|
||||||||||
Daniel
R. Ash (1)
|
2,920,469
|
1,667,510
|
—
|
$
|
0.0787
|
10/01/2012
|
|||||||||||||
Daniel
R. Ash (2)
|
349,426
|
—
|
—
|
$
|
0.0787
|
04/21/2013
|
|||||||||||||
Daniel
R. Ash (1)
|
3,598,027
|
4,877,206
|
—
|
$
|
0.0787
|
05/20/2013
|
_______________________
(1) |
Option
vests 33.3% after one year, with the remaining 66.7% to vest evenly over
the remaining months.
|
(2) |
Option
fully vested after 90 days of the grant date of April 21,
2008.
|
Retirement
Plans
We
currently have no plans that provide for the payment of retirement benefits, or
benefits that will be paid primarily following retirement, including but not
limited to tax-qualified defined benefit plans, supplemental executive
retirement plans, tax-qualified defined contribution plans and nonqualified
defined contribution plans.
42
Potential
Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control
Except as
described below under “Employment Agreements,” we currently have no contract,
agreement, plan or arrangement, whether written or unwritten, that provides for
payments to a named executive officer at, following, or in connection with any
termination, including without limitation resignation, severance, retirement or
a constructive termination of a named executive officer, or a change in control
of the registrant or a change in the named executive officer’s responsibilities,
with respect to each named executive officer.
Employment
Agreements
On
October 1, 2007, the Board of
Directors of CelLynx-California approved the following compensation packages for
Daniel R. Ash and Tareq Risheq:
Annual
Base Salary:
|
$200,000
|
|
Bonus
Plan:
|
Participation
in the CelLynx Bonus Plan can amount up to 30% of the annual base salary,
but is conditioned upon achievement of the goals and objectives of the
then current plan, including those related to overall company
performance.
|
|
Fringe
Benefits:
|
Fifteen
paid vacation days per year. Ten paid holidays per
year. Health insurance with hospital
coverage.
|
|
Stock
Options:
|
3%
of the current outstanding common stock based the fair market value on the
date of hire of $0.10 per share. The options vest over three
years with 33.3% vesting after the first year and monthly vesting
thereafter of 1/24 th of the remaining
66.6%.
|
|
Severance:
|
If
employment is terminated without cause, Mr. Ash will receive six months
pay.
|
|
Acquisition:
|
If
CelLynx-California is acquired, all outstanding stock options will become
fully vested.
|
The Board
of Directors of CelLynx-California amended this compensation package on May 20,
2008, to provide for an annual salary of $170,000 for Mr. Ash and $108,000 for
Mr. Risheq. Mr. Risheq resigned as Chief Strategy Officer on December
12, 2008, and as of that date was no longer entitled to this
compensation.
On July
22, 2008, CelLynx-California entered into a consulting agreement (the
“Consulting Agreement”) with Kevin Pickard whereby Mr. Pickard agreed to serve
as the Company’s interim Chief Financial Officer for a period beginning on the
date of the Consulting Agreement and ending on the earlier of (i) the date that
the Company retains a permanent Chief Financial Officer, (ii) the
90th day after the closing of the reverse take-over transaction
contemplated by the Exchange Agreement, or (iii) the date which the Company
notifies Mr. Pickard that he has been terminated in writing, and which
notification may occur at any time for any reason. As an inducement
to enter into the Consulting Agreement, CelLynx-California granted Mr. Pickard
100,000 shares of CelLynx-California common stock and $5,000 in
cash. The CelLynx-California common shares were converted into 62,896
shares of the Company's common stock and 62,897 shares of the Company's Series A
Preferred Stock upon the closing of the reverse take-over
transaction. The Series A Preferred Stock automatically converted
into 62,897 shares of the Company’s common stock upon the filing of a
Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation increasing
the number of authorized common stock from 100,000,000 to 400,000,000 on
November 7, 2008. On November 1, 2008, the Company entered into an
updated agreement with Mr. Pickard’s accounting firm that provides for monthly
cash compensation of $5,000 per month and the issuance of 350,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock.
43
Director
Compensation
On July
15, 2008, CelLynx-California entered into an agreement with Mr. Norman W.
Collins that granted Mr. Collins a stock option to purchase 610,000 shares of
CelLynx-California’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.09 per share that
vests 25% per year so long as Mr. Collins remains a director of
CelLynx. Upon the closing of the Exchange Agreement, this option was
exchanged for an option to purchase 767,337 shares of the Company's common stock
at an exercise price of $0.0715 per share.
Other
than as described above, we do not pay any compensation to members of our board
of directors for their service on the board. However, we intend to review and
consider future proposals regarding board compensation.
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
Securities
Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
Set forth
in the table below is information regarding awards made through compensation
plans or arrangements through September 30, 2008, the most recently completed
fiscal year.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
|
||||||
Plan
category
|
Number
of securities
to
be issued
upon
exercise
of
outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights
(a)
|
Weighted-average
exercise
price
of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and
rights
(b)
|
Number
of securities
remaining
available
for
future issuance
under
equity
compensation
plans
(excluding
securities
reflected
in
column (a))
(c)
|
|||
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders
|
--
|
$
|
--
|
--
|
||
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
27,713,833
|
$
|
0.102
|
47,286,167
|
||
Total
|
27,713,833
|
47,286,167
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Beneficial
ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Unless otherwise indicated in the table, the persons and
entities named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with
respect to the shares set forth opposite the shareholder’s name. Unless
otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner listed below is 25910
Acero, Suite 370, Mission Viejo, California 92691. The percentage of
class beneficially owned set forth below is based on 146,418,791 shares
outstanding as of December 31, 2009.
44
Name
and Position
|
Number
of Shares
of
Common
Stock
Beneficially
Owned
(1)
|
Percent
of Shares
of
Common
Stock
Beneficially
Owned
(2)
|
||||||
Daniel
R. Ash, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer,
Secretary and Director (3)
|
37,855,024
|
24.3
|
%
|
|||||
Kevin
Pickard, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (4)
|
382,970
|
*
|
||||||
Tareq
Risheq, Director (5)
|
32,487,103
|
21.8
|
%
|
|||||
Don
Wright, Chairman of the Board (6)
|
878,101
|
*
|
||||||
Norman
W. Collins, Director (7)
|
704,176
|
*
|
||||||
Dwayne
Yaretz, Director
|
-
|
*
|
||||||
All
Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (6 persons)
|
71,816,581
|
44.0
|
%
|
________________
* Less
than 1%
(1)
|
Under
Rule 13d-3, a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who,
directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding,
relationship, or otherwise has or shares: (i) voting power, which includes
the power to vote, or to direct the voting of shares; and (ii) investment
power, which includes the power to dispose or direct the disposition of
shares. Certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by more than
one person (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the power
to dispose of the shares). In addition, shares are deemed to be
beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to acquire the
shares (for example, upon exercise of an option) within 60 days of the
date as of which the information is provided. In computing the percentage
ownership of any person, the amount of shares outstanding is deemed to
include the amount of shares beneficially owned by such person (and only
such person) by reason of these acquisition rights. As a result, the
percentage of outstanding shares of any person as shown in this table does
not necessarily reflect the person’s actual ownership or voting power with
respect to the number of shares of common stock actually
outstanding.
|
(2)
|
Percentage
based upon 146,418,791 issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s
capital stock.
|
(3)
|
Includes
28,345,452 shares of common stock, options to purchase 6,867,921 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $0.0787 per share, a $20,000 note
convertible into 2,515,858 shares of common stock at a conversion price of
$0.0079 per share and a $10,000 note convertible into 125,793 shares of
common stock at a conversion price of $0.0795 per
share.
|
(4)
|
Mr.
Pickard is an outside consultant providing services commonly provided by a
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. This figure does not
include 400,000 shares owned of record by Pickard & Green, CPAs, an
entity in which Mr. Pickard is a partner. Mr. Pickard disclaims
beneficial ownership of such 400,000
shares.
|
(5)
|
Includes
29,845,452 shares of common stock, a $20,000 note convertible into
2,515,858 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.0079 per
share and a $10,000 note convertible into 125,793 shares of common stock
at a conversion price of $0.0795 per share. Mr. Risheq resigned
as Chief Strategy Officer on December 12, 2008 but remains a director of
the Company.
|
(6)
|
Consisting
of options to purchase 878,101 shares of the Company’s common
stock.
|
(7)
|
Includes
options to purchase 213,383 shares of the Company’s common
stock.
|
45
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Share
Exchange Agreement
On July
24, 2008, in a reverse take-over transaction, we acquired a cellular amplifier
business based in California by executing the Exchange Agreement by and among
the Company, CelLynx-California, and the CelLynx Owners.
Under the
Exchange Agreement, on the Closing Date, we acquired all of the issued and
outstanding shares of CelLynx-California through the issuance of 32,454,922
restricted shares of our common stock and 45,516,034 restricted shares of our
Series A Preferred Stock to the CelLynx Owners. Immediately prior to the
exchange transaction, we had 37,597,890 shares of common stock issued and
outstanding and no shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.
Immediately after the issuance of the shares to the CelLynx Owners, we had
80,552,812 shares of common stock issued and outstanding (including the shares
issued in the Financing) and 45,516,034 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
issued and outstanding. The Series A Preferred Stock automatically converted
into common stock upon the filing of a Certificate of Amendment to our Articles
of Incorporation increasing the number of authorized common stock from
100,000,000 to 400,000,000. As a result of this exchange transaction,
the CelLynx Owners became our controlling shareholders and CelLynx-California
became our wholly owned subsidiary. In connection with CelLynx-California
becoming our wholly owned subsidiary, we acquired the business and operations of
CelLynx-California, which has become our principal business.
Related
Party Transactions of CelLynx
On
October 1, 2007, CelLynx-California granted to Robert J. Legendre, the Company’s
former Executive Chairman of the Board, options to purchase 9,725,991 shares of
CelLynx-California’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.09 per share in
exchange for executive management services rendered as a
consultant. Upon the closing of the Exchange Agreement, this option
was exchanged for an option to purchase 12,234,608 shares of the Company’s
common stock at an exercise price of $0.0715 per share. Mr. Legendre
resigned from the Company on May 4, 2009.
On March
27, 2007, CelLynx-California entered into a two-year convertible promissory note
with Daniel R. Ash, the Company’s current Chief Executive Officer and a
director, and Tareq Risheq, currently a director of the Company, in the amount
of $20,000 each in exchange for cash leant to CelLynx-California. The
unpaid principal balance accrues interest at a rate of 4% per annum, computed on
the basis of the actual number of days elapsed and a year of 365
days. The note and accrued interest is convertible into
CelLynx-California common stock at a conversion rate of $0.01 per
share. Upon the closing of the Exchange Agreement, these notes were
exchanged for notes of the Company at a conversion rate $0.0079 per
share.
On
October 25, 2007, CelLynx-California entered into a two-year convertible
promissory note with Mssrs. Ash and Risheq in the amount of $10,000 each in
exchange for cash leant to CelLynx-California. The unpaid principal
balance accrues interest at a rate of 4% per annum, computed on the basis of the
actual number of days elapsed and a year of 365 days. The note and
accrued interest is convertible into CelLynx-California common stock at a
conversion rate of $0.10 per share. Upon the closing of the Exchange
Agreement, these notes were exchanged for notes of the Company at a conversion
rate $0.0795 per share.
46
On
February 12, 2008, CelLynx-California entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement
with Norman Collins, currently a director of the Company, under which
CelLynx-California issued an aggregate of 1,111,111 shares of common stock in
exchange for an investment of $100,000. Pursuant to the Stock
Purchase Agreement, 100,000 shares were delivered to Mr. Collins and 1,011,111
shares were held in escrow and automatically cancelled upon the closing of the
Exchange Agreement. The remaining 100,000 shares were converted into
125,793 shares of the Company.
On July
15, 2008, CelLynx-California entered into an agreement with Mr. Collins that
granted Mr. Collins a stock option to purchase 610,000 shares of
CelLynx-California’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.09 per share that
vests 25% per year so long as Mr. Collins remains a director of
CelLynx. Upon the closing of the Exchange Agreement, this option was
exchanged for an option to purchase 767,337 shares of the Company’s common stock
at an exercise price of $0.0715 per share.
Other
than the transactions described above, there were no transactions or proposed
transactions since the beginning of CelLynx’s last fiscal year in which CelLynx
was or is to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds the lesser of
$120,000 or one percent of the average of CelLynx’s total assets at year-end for
the last three completed fiscal years, and in which any related person had or
will have a direct or indirect material interest.
Director
Independence
One of
our directors – Norman W. Collins – is an independent director as that term
is defined under NASDAQ Rules and Regulations.
Index to Financial Statements | Page |
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-2 |
Consolidated
Financial Statements:
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
F-3 |
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended September
30, 2009 and 2008
|
F-4 |
Consolidated
Statements Of Stockholders’ Deficit for the Years Ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
F-5 |
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended September
30, 2009 and 2008
|
F-6 |
Notes
To Financial Statements
|
F-7 |
Consolidated
Balance Sheets – As of December 31, 2009, and September 30,
2009
|
Q-2 |
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended December
31, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)
|
Q-3 |
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended December
31, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)
|
Q-4 |
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
Q-5 |
47
Experts
Our
consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows,
for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, included in this prospectus
have been audited by Frazer Frost, LLP, independent registered public accounting
firm, as indicated in their report with respect thereto, and are included herein
in reliance upon the authority of Frazer Frost, LLP, as experts in auditing and
accounting.
Legal
matters
The
validity of the Shares offered hereby will be passed upon for us by Durham Jones
& Pinegar, P.C., 111 East Broadway, Suite 900, Salt Lake City, Utah
84111.
48
CelLynx
Group, Inc.
Consolidated
Financial Statements
Contents
Page
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-2
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
F-3
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
F-4
|
Consolidated
Statements Of Stockholders’ Deficit for the Years Ended September 30, 2009
and 2008
|
F-5
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
F-6
|
Notes
To Financial Statements
|
F-7
|
F-1
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the
Board of Directors and Stockholders
CelLynx
Group, Inc.
Mission
Viejo, California
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CelLynx Group, Inc.
(formerly Norpac Technologies, Inc.) as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit and cash
flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audit.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
consolidated financial statements are free of material
misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we
engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.
Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as
a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of CelLynx Group, Inc as of
September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the results of operations and cash flows for
the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that
the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1
to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has net operating cash
flow deficits and a deficit accumulated during the development
stage. These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those
matters also are described in Note1. The consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
this uncertainty.
/s/
Frazer Frost, LLP
(Successor
entity of Moore Stephens Wurth Frazer and Torbet, LLP, see Form 8-K filed on
January 7, 2010)
Brea,
California
January
13, 2010
F-2
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC.
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
||||||||
AS
OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 6,776 | $ | 599,024 | ||||
Inventory
|
16,316 | - | ||||||
Other
current assets
|
15,750 | 6,862 | ||||||
TOTAL
CURRENT ASSETS
|
38,842 | 605,886 | ||||||
EQUIPMENT,
net
|
11,359 | 9,658 | ||||||
INTANGIBLE
ASSETS, net
|
97,180 | 70,776 | ||||||
OTHER
ASSETS
|
16,190 | 11,526 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 163,571 | $ | 697,846 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$ | 832,634 | $ | 206,298 | ||||
Accrued
interest
|
28,334 | 12,507 | ||||||
Accrued
derivative liabilities
|
- | 5,677,156 | ||||||
Convertible
stockholder notes, net of debt discount of $1,092 and
$28,943
|
||||||||
as
of September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively
|
101,908 | 11,057 | ||||||
Convertible
promissory notes, current portion
|
100,000 | - | ||||||
TOTAL
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
1,062,876 | 5,907,018 | ||||||
LONG
TERM LIABILITIES:
|
||||||||
Convertible
promissory note, net of debt discount of $126,795 and
$241,067
|
||||||||
as
of September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively
|
135,561 | 21,289 | ||||||
Convertible
stockholder notes, net of debt discount of $0 and
$17,031
|
- | 2,969 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
|
$ | 1,198,437 | $ | 5,931,276 | ||||
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS'
DEFICIT:
|
||||||||
Series
A Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value;100,000,000 shares
authorized;
|
||||||||
nil
and 45,516,034 shares issued and outstanding
|
||||||||
as
of September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively
|
- | 45,516 | ||||||
Common
stock, $0.001 par value, 400,000,000 authorized; 137,379,397
and
|
||||||||
80,552,812
shares issued and outstanding as of
|
||||||||
September
30, 2009 and 2008, respectively
|
137,379 | 80,553 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
10,501,965 | 2,335,949 | ||||||
Accumulateed
deficit
|
(11,674,210 | ) | (7,695,448 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders' deficit
|
(1,034,866 | ) | (5,233,430 | ) | ||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
$ | 163,571 | $ | 697,846 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-3
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC.
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
||||||||
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
|
||||||||
For
the Years Ended September 30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Net
Revenue
|
$ | 10,373 | $ | - | ||||
Cost
of Revenue
|
7,554 | - | ||||||
Gross
profit
|
2,819 | - | ||||||
Operating
expenses
|
||||||||
Research
and development
|
340,995 | 308,906 | ||||||
General
and administrative
|
3,294,158 | 4,397,131 | ||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
3,635,153 | 4,706,037 | ||||||
Loss
from operations
|
$ | (3,632,334 | ) | $ | (4,706,037 | ) | ||
Non-operating
income (expense):
|
||||||||
Interest
income
|
961 | 4,198 | ||||||
Interest
and financing costs
|
(179,228 | ) | (932,393 | ) | ||||
Change
in fair value of accrued beneficial conversion liability
|
251,410 | (1,151,992 | ) | |||||
Change
in fair value of accrued warrant liability
|
(419,571 | ) | 127,688 | |||||
Total
non-operating expense
|
(346,428 | ) | (1,952,499 | ) | ||||
Loss
before provision for income taxes
|
(3,978,762 | ) | (6,658,536 | ) | ||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
- | - | ||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (3,978,762 | ) | $ | (6,658,536 | ) | ||
Weighted
average shares outstanding - Basic and Diluted:
|
125,094,999 | 40,407,479 | ||||||
Earnings
per share - Basic and Diluted:
|
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-4
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
Stock
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-in
|
Accumulated
|
Total Stockholders' |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Deficit
|
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
September 30, 2007
|
41,107,396 | $ | 41,107 | 27,153,988 | $ | 27,154 | $ | 648,022 | $ | (1,036,912 | ) | $ | (320,629 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Shares
issued for cash
|
- | - | 938,897 | 939 | 745,345 | - | 746,284 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
issued for services
|
4,408,638 | 4,409 | 4,362,037 | 4,362 | 563,231 | - | 572,002 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fair
value of stock options reclassified to share-based compensation
liability
|
- | - | - | - | (89,618 | ) | - | (89,618 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Shares
issued in merger with Norpac Technologies, Inc.
|
- | - | 48,097,890 | 48,098 | 1,200,650 | 1,248,748 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair
value of warrants transferred to liability
|
- | - | - | - | (731,681 | ) | - | (731,681 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | - | - | (6,658,536 | ) | (6,658,536 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
September 30, 2008
|
45,516,034 | $ | 45,516 | 80,552,812 | $ | 80,553 | $ | 2,335,949 | $ | (7,695,448 | ) | $ | (5,233,430 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Conversion
of preferred stock to common stock upon the increase of authorized
shares
|
(45,516,034 | ) | (45,516 | ) | 45,516,034 | 45,516 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
of share based compensation liability to equity
|
- | - | - | - | 2,701,572 | - | 2,701,572 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fair
value of share based compensation for employees and
consultants
|
- | - | - | - | 690,353 | - | 690,353 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
of beneficial conversion liability to equity
|
- | - | - | - | 2,120,181 | - | 2,120,181 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
of warrant liability to equity
|
- | - | - | - | 1,023,564 | - | 1,023,564 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock for the purchase of licensing rights
|
- | - | 57,143 | 57 | 7,372 | - | 7,429 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock for promissory note
|
- | - | 37,500 | 38 | 4,208 | - | 4,246 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of warrants for consulting services
|
- | - | - | - | 118,382 | - | 118,382 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock for accounting services
|
- | - | 400,000 | 400 | 71,600 | - | 72,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock for consulting services
|
- | - | 3,970,908 | 3,971 | 722,628 | - | 726,599 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock for cash
|
- | - | 6,845,000 | 6,844 | 706,156 | - | 713,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | - | - | (3,978,762 | ) | (3,978,762 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
September 30, 2009
|
- | $ | - | 137,379,397 | $ | 137,379 | $ | 10,501,965 | $ | (11,674,210 | ) | $ | (1,034,866 | ) |
Effective
July 24, 2008, the Company effected a 1.2579 for 1 forward stock split of the
authorized, issued and outstanding common stock, without change to par value.
All share amounts
have been retroactively adjusted for all periods presented.
Effective
July 24, 2008, the Company issued Series A Preferred Stock on a pro rata basis
to the shareholders of CelLynx, Inc. All share amounts have been
retroactively adjusted
for all periods presented.
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-5
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC.
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
|
||||||||
For
the Years Ended September 30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (3,978,762 | ) | $ | (6,658,536 | ) | ||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
6,813 | 2,278 | ||||||
Warrants
issued for services
|
118,382 | - | ||||||
Stock
issued for services
|
798,599 | 572,002 | ||||||
Stock
compensation expense for options issued to employees and
consultants
|
690,353 | 2,625,106 | ||||||
Change
in fair value of accrued beneficial conversion liability
|
(251,410 | ) | 1,151,992 | |||||
Change
in fair value of accrued warrant liability
|
419,571 | (127,688 | ) | |||||
Non
cash financing costs
|
- | 833,321 | ||||||
Amortization
of debt discount
|
163,400 | 86,085 | ||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Change
in inventory
|
(16,316 | ) | - | |||||
Change
in other assets
|
(13,552 | ) | (18,388 | ) | ||||
Change
in accounts payable, accrued expenses and accrued interest
|
641,163 | 180,034 | ||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
$ | (1,421,759 | ) | $ | (1,353,794 | ) | ||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Purchase
of equipment
|
(6,663 | ) | (10,572 | ) | ||||
Purchase
of intangible assets
|
(19,826 | ) | (42,979 | ) | ||||
Net
cash acquired in merger with Norpac Technologies, Inc.
|
- | 1,250,114 | ||||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
$ | (26,489 | ) | $ | 1,196,563 | |||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from convertible promissory notes
|
75,000 | - | ||||||
Proceeds
from related parties
|
68,000 | - | ||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
713,000 | 746,284 | ||||||
Proceeds
from stockholders notes
|
- | 7,600 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
$ | 856,000 | $ | 753,884 | ||||
NET
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH
|
(592,248 | ) | 596,653 | |||||
CASH,
BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
599,024 | 2,371 | ||||||
CASH,
END OF PERIOD
|
$ | 6,776 | $ | 599,024 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING:
|
||||||||
Issuance
of stock for licensing agreement
|
$ | 7,429 | $ | - | ||||
Increase
in convertible promissory note for interest payable
|
$ | - | $ | 12,356 | ||||
Reclassification
of share-based compensation liability to additional paid-in
capital
|
$ | 2,701,572 | $ | - | ||||
Reclassification
of accrued beneficial conversion liability to additional paid-in
capital
|
$ | 2,120,181 | $ | - | ||||
Reclassification
of accrued warrant liability to additional paid-in capital
|
$ | 1,023,564 | $ | - |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-6
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Note
1 - Organization and Basis of Presentation
Organization and Line of
Business
CelLynx Group, Inc., formerly known as
NorPac Technologies, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “CelLynx” or the
“Company”), was originally incorporated under the laws of the State of Minnesota
on April 1, 1998.
On July
23, 2008, prior to the closing of the Share Exchange Agreement (described
below), the Company entered into a Regulation S Subscription Agreement pursuant
to which the Company issued 10,500,000 shares of its common stock and warrants
to purchase 10,500,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.20 per
share to non-U.S. persons for an aggregate purchase price of
$1,575,000.
On July
24, 2008, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement, as amended, with
CelLynx, Inc., a California corporation ("CelLynx-California") and twenty-three
(23) CelLynx-California shareholders who, immediately prior to the closing of
the transaction collectively held 100% of CelLynx-California’s issued and
outstanding shares of capital stock. As a result, the
CelLynx-California shareholders were to receive 77,970,956 shares of the
Company’s common stock in exchange for 100%, or 61,983,580 shares, of capital
stock of CelLynx-California’s common stock. However, the Company had
only 41,402,110 authorized, unissued and unreserved shares of common stock
available, after taking into account the shares of common stock issued in the
July 23, 2008, financing described above. Pursuant to the Share
Exchange Agreement, in the event that there were an insufficient number of
authorized but unissued and unreserved common stock to complete the transaction,
the Company was to issue all of the available authorized but unissued and
unreserved common stock to the CelLynx-California shareholders in a pro rata
manner and then establish a class of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
(“Series A Preferred Stock”) and issue that number of shares of Series A
Preferred Stock such that the common stock underlying the Series A Preferred
Stock plus the common stock actually issued to the CelLynx-California
shareholders would equal the total number of shares of common stock due to the
CelLynx-California shareholders under the Share Exchange
Agreement. As a result, the Company issued to the CelLynx-California
shareholders an aggregate of 32,454,922 shares of common stock and 45,516,034
shares of Series A Preferred Stock. The Series A Preferred Stock
automatically converts into common stock on a one-to-one ratio upon the
authorized capital stock of the Company being increased to include not less than
150,000,000 shares of common stock.
On
November 7, 2008, the Company amended the Articles of Incorporation to increase
the number of authorized shares to 400,000,000 and converted the 45,516,034
shares of Series A Preferred Stock into 45,516,034 shares of the Company’s
common stock.
The
exchange of shares with CelLynx-California was accounted for as a reverse
acquisition under the purchase method of accounting since the shareholders of
CelLynx-California obtained control of the Company. On August 5, 2008, NorPac
Technologies, Inc. changed its name to CelLynx Group,
Inc. Accordingly, the merger of CelLynx-California into the Company
was recorded as a recapitalization of CelLynx-California, with
CelLynx-California being treated as the continuing entity. The historical
financial statements presented are the financial statements of
CelLynx-California. The Share Exchange Agreement has been treated as a
recapitalization and not as a business combination; therefore, no pro forma
information is disclosed. At the date of this transaction, the net assets of the
legal acquirer CelLynx Group, Inc., were $1,248,748.
F-7
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
As a
result of the reverse merger transactions described above, the historical
financial statements presented are those of CelLynx-California, the operating
entities. The CelLynx-California shareholder received 1.2579292
shares of stock in the Company for each share of CelLynx-California capital
stock. The consolidated statement of
stockholders’ deficit and all shares and per-share information have been
retroactively restated for all periods presented to reflect the reverse merger
transaction.
On
October 27, 2008, the Board of Directors approved a change of the Company’s
fiscal year end from June 30 to September 30 to agree with the fiscal year of
CelLynx-California. The fiscal year end change was effective for the
year ended September 30, 2008.
The
Company develops and manufactures a cell phone signal amplifier.
Development Stage Company
and Going Concern
The
Company was in the development stage through June 30, 2009. In July
2009, the Company received the first 220 units from its
manufacturer. The Company used 66 of the units as demo units and
began selling the remainder. The Company is fully operational and as
such is no longer considered a development stage company. During the
period that the Company was considered a development stage company, the Company
incurred accumulated losses of approximately $10,948,625.
These
consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis,
which implies the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its
liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company is unlikely to pay
dividends or generate significant earnings in the immediate or foreseeable
future. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the
continued financial support from its stockholders, the ability of the Company to
obtain necessary equity and debt financing to continue operations and to
generate sustainable revenue. There is no guarantee that the Company will be
able to raise adequate equity or debt financing or generate profitable
operations. For the year ended September 30, 2009, the Company incurred a net
loss of $3,978,762. As of September 30, 2009, the Company has an
accumulated deficit of $11,674,210 These consolidated financial statements do
not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded
asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should
the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. Management
intends to raise additional funds through equity or debt financing and to
generate cash from the sale of its product.
F-8
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Note
2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of
Presentation
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
and have been consistently applied. The accompanying consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of CelLynx Group, Inc., and its 100%
owned subsidiary, CelLynx, Inc. All intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of
Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could materially differ from those
estimates, upon which the carrying values were based.
Concentration of Credit
Risk
Cash
includes deposits in accounts maintained in the United States. Certain financial
instruments, which subject the Company to concentration of credit risk, consist
of cash. The Company maintains balances at financial institutions which, from
time to time, may exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured
limits. As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company had deposits
in excess of federally-insured limits totaling $0 and $399,204. The
Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
Cash and
cash equivalents include cash in hand and cash in time deposits, certificates of
deposit and all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three
months or less.
Inventory
Inventory
consists of finished goods ready for sale and is valued at the lower of cost
(determined on a first-in, first-out basis) or market.
Equipment
Equipment
is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Major renewals are
charged directly to the equipment accounts, while replacements, maintenance, and
repairs which do not improve or extend the respective lives of the assets are
expensed currently. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are reviewed
periodically to ensure that the depreciation method and period are consistent
with the anticipated pattern of future economic benefits. Gains and losses on
disposals are included in the results of operations. The useful life of the
equipment being depreciated is between three and five years.
F-9
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Intangible
Assets
Acquired
patents, licensing rights and trademarks are capitalized at their acquisition
cost or fair value. The legal costs, patent registration fees, and models and
drawings required for filing patent applications are capitalized if they relate
to commercially viable technologies. Commercially viable technologies are those
technologies that are projected to generate future positive cash flows in the
near term. Legal costs associated with applications that are not determined to
be commercially viable are expensed as incurred. All research and development
costs incurred in developing the patentable idea are expensed as incurred. Legal
fees from the costs incurred in successful defense to the extent of an evident
increase in the value of the patents are capitalized.
Capitalized
costs for patents are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining
twenty-year legal life of each patent after the costs have been incurred. Once
each patent or trademark is issued, capitalized costs are amortized on a
straight-line basis over a period not to exceed 20 years and 10 years,
respectively. Licensing right is amortized on a straight-line over a period of
10 years.
Impairment or Disposal of
Long-lived Assets
The
Company applies the provisions of ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant, and
Equipment,” which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the
impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. ASC 360 requires impairment losses
to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of
impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated
by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amounts. In that event, a
loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the
fair value of the long-lived assets. Loss on long-lived assets to be disposed of
is determined in a similar manner, except that fair values are reduced for the
cost of disposal. Based on its review, the Company believes that as of September
30, 2009 and 2008, there was no significant impairment of its long-lived
assets.
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company's revenue recognition policies are in compliance with SEC Staff
Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 104. Revenue is recognized at the date of
shipment to customers, the price is fixed or determinable, the delivery is
completed, no other significant obligations of the Company exist and
collectability is reasonably assured.
Accrued Warrant Liability
and Accrued Beneficial Conversion Liability
Pursuant
to ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging,” the Company recorded the fair value
of all outstanding options, warrants, and beneficial conversion features as
accrued liabilities at September 30, 2008, since the Company did not have enough
authorized shares to satisfy the exercise of its outstanding, options, warrants,
and the conversion of the convertible promissory notes. The Company
reclassified the liabilities into additional paid-in capital on November 7,
2008, when the Company increased the number of authorized shares to
400,000,000.
F-10
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Fair Value of Financial
Instruments
For
certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and
short-term debt, the carrying amounts approximate their fair values due to their
short maturities. In addition, the Company has long-term debt with financial
institutions. The carrying amounts of the line of credit and other long-term
liabilities approximate their fair values based on current rates of interest for
instruments with similar characteristics.
ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements
and Disclosures,” requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments
held by the Company. ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” defines fair value,
and establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value
measurement that enhances disclosure requirements for fair value
measures. The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance
sheets for receivables and current liabilities each qualify as financial
instruments and are a reasonable estimate of their fair values because of the
short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their
expected realization and their current market rate of interest. The three levels
of valuation hierarchy are defined as follows:
Level 1
inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices for identical assets or
liabilities in active markets.
Level 2
inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and
liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or
liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the
financial instrument.
Level 3
inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair
value measurement.
As of
September 30, 2009, the Company did not identify any assets and liabilities that
are required to be presented on the balance sheet at fair value.
Income
Taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income
Taxes.” ASC 740 requires a company to use the asset and liability method of
accounting for income taxes, whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for
deductible temporary differences, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized
for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences
between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases.
Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of
management, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of, the
deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on
the date of enactment.
F-11
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Under ASC
740, a tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than
not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax
examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount
of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination.
For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is
recorded. The adoption had no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
Earnings Per
Share
Earnings
per share is calculated in accordance with the ASC Topic 260, “Earnings Per
Share.” Basic earnings per share is based upon the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is
based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock warrants
were converted or exercised. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing
the net loss for the period by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period, plus the potential dilutive effect of common
shares issuable upon exercise or conversion of outstanding stock options and
warrants during the period. Due to the net loss, none of the
potential dilutive securities have been included in the calculation of dilutive
earning per share since their effect would be anti-dilutive.
Stock-Based
Compensation
The
Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718,
“Compensation – Stock Compensation.” ASC 718 requires companies to
measure compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation at fair value at
the grant date and recognize the expense over the employee’s requisite service
period. Under ASC 718, the Company’s volatility is based on the historical
volatility of the Company’s stock or the expected volatility of similar
companies. The expected life assumption is primarily based on historical
exercise patterns and employee post-vesting termination behavior. The risk-free
interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury
yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
The
Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model which was developed for use
in estimating the fair value of options. Option-pricing models require the input
of highly complex and subjective variables including the expected life of
options granted and the Company’s expected stock price volatility over a period
equal to or greater than the expected life of the options. Because changes in
the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimated value of the
Company’s employee stock options, it is management’s opinion that the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model may not provide an accurate measure of the
fair value of the Company’s employee stock options. Although the fair value of
employee stock options is determined in accordance with ASC 718 using an
option-pricing model, that value may not be indicative of the fair value
observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction.
The
Company recognizes in the statement of operations the grant-date fair value of
stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees and
non-employees.
F-12
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
In June
2008, FASB issued ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging,” which provides a
two-step model to determine whether a financial instrument or an embedded
feature is indexed to an issuer’s own stock and thus able to qualify for the
scope exception in ASC 815-10-15-74. This standard is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. This standard triggers liability accounting on all instruments
and embedded features exercisable at strike prices denominated in any currency
other than the functional currency of the operating entity. The
Company does not believe that the adoption of this pronouncement will have an
impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
On
January 1, 2009, the Company adopted ASC sub-topic 810-10 (formerly SFAS
No. 160, “Accounting and Reporting on Non-controlling Interest in
Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB 51”). ASC 810-10 states
that accounting and reporting for minority interests are to be recharacterized
as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. The
calculation of earnings per share continues to be based on income amounts
attributable to the parent. ASC 810-10 applies to all entities that prepare
consolidated financial statements, except not-for-profit organizations, but
affects only those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in
one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. The
adoption of ASC 810-10 did not have a material impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
During
the second quarter of 2009, the Company adopted guidance issued by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) in April 2009 that is intended to
provide additional application guidance and enhance disclosures about fair value
measurements and impairments of securities and guidance that expanded the fair
value disclosures required for all financial instruments within the scope of ASC
Topic 825 “Financial Instruments” to interim periods. The adoption of this
guidance did not materially impact the consolidated financial
statements.
In April
2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard to make the other-than-temporary
impairments guidance more operational and to improve the presentation of
other-than-temporary impairments in the financial statements. This standard will
replace the existing requirement that the entity’s management assert it has both
the intent and ability to hold an impaired debt security until recovery with a
requirement that management assert it does not have the intent to sell the
security, and it is more likely than not it will not have to sell the security
before recovery of its cost basis. This standard provides increased disclosure
about the credit and noncredit components of impaired debt securities that are
not expected to be sold and also requires increased and more frequent
disclosures regarding expected cash flows, credit losses, and an aging of
securities with unrealized losses. Although this standard does not result in a
change in the carrying amount of debt securities, it does require that the
portion of an other-than-temporary impairment not related to a credit loss for a
held-to-maturity security be recognized in a new category of other comprehensive
income and be amortized over the remaining life of the debt security as an
increase in the carrying value of the security. This standard became effective
for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of
this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
In April
2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard that requires disclosures about
fair value of financial instruments not measured on the balance sheet at fair
value in interim financial statements as well as in annual financial statements.
Prior to this accounting standard, fair values for these assets and liabilities
were only disclosed annually. This standard applies to all financial instruments
within its scope and requires all entities to disclose the method(s) and
significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial
instruments. This standard does not require disclosures for earlier periods
presented for comparative purposes at initial adoption, but in periods after the
initial adoption, this standard requires comparative disclosures only for
periods ending after initial adoption. The adoption of this standard did not
have a material impact on the disclosures related to its consolidated financial
statements.
F-13
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
In June
2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard amending the accounting and
disclosure requirements for transfers of financial assets. This accounting
standard requires greater transparency and additional disclosures for transfers
of financial assets and the entity’s continuing involvement with them and
changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets. In addition, it
eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity (“QSPE”). This
accounting standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company has not completed the
assessment of the impact this new standard will have on the Company’s
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
In
June 2009, the FASB issued guidance which amends certain ASC concepts
related to consolidation of variable interest entities (formerly SFAS
No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)”). This guidance
is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will
have on the consolidated financial statements.
In August
2009, the FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) regarding measuring
liabilities at fair value. This ASU provides additional guidance clarifying the
measurement of liabilities at fair value in circumstances in which a quoted
price in an active market for the identical liability is not available; under
those circumstances, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using
one or more of the valuation techniques, as defined. This ASU is effective for
the first reporting period, including interim periods, beginning after the
issuance of this ASU. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on
the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In
October 2009, the FASB issued an ASU regarding accounting for own-share lending
arrangements in contemplation of convertible debt issuance or other
financing. This ASU requires that at the date of issuance of the
shares in a share-lending arrangement entered into in contemplation of a
convertible debt offering or other financing, the shares issued shall be
measured at fair value and be recognized as an issuance cost, with an offset to
additional paid-in capital. Further, loaned shares are excluded from basic and
diluted earnings per share unless default of the share-lending arrangement
occurs, at which time the loaned shares would be included in the basic and
diluted earnings-per-share calculation. This ASU is effective for
fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2009, and interim periods within
those fiscal years for arrangements outstanding as of the beginning of those
fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on its
consolidated financial statements.
F-14
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Note 3 - Equipment
Equipment
consists of the following:
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Office
furniture & equipment
|
$ | 9,879 | $ | 4,211 | ||||
Computer
equipment
|
8,930 | 7,935 | ||||||
18,809 | 12,146 | |||||||
Less:
accumulated depreciation
|
(7,450 | ) | (2,488 | ) | ||||
Equipment,
net
|
$ | 11,359 | $ | 9,658 |
The
Company recorded depreciation expense of $ 4,962, and $1,669 for the years ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Note
4 - Intangible Assets
The
Company incurred legal costs in acquiring patent and trademark rights. These
costs are projected to generate future positive cash flows and have been
capitalized to intangible assets in the period incurred. Once each patent or
trademark is issued, capitalized costs are amortized on a straight-line basis
over a period not to exceed 20 years and 10 years, respectively.
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Patents
|
$ | 78,724 | $ | 59,198 | ||||
Trademarks
|
12,487 | 12,187 | ||||||
License
rights
|
8,429 | - | ||||||
99,640 | 71,385 | |||||||
Less:
accumulated amortization
|
(2,460 | ) | (609 | ) | ||||
Intangibles,
net
|
$ | 97,180 | $ | 70,776 |
The
Company recorded amortization expense related to trademarks of $1,851 and $609
for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. No
amortization has been recorded for the patents as of September 30, 2009, as the
patents have not been issued to the Company.
F-15
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
The
following table summarizes the amortization over the next 5
years:
Years
ended September 30,
|
Amount
|
||||
2010
|
$ | 4,209 | |||
2011
|
4,209 | ||||
2012
|
4,209 | ||||
2013
|
4,209 | ||||
2014
|
4,209 |
Note
5 - Convertible Promissory Notes
Convertible Promissory Note
Issued August 15, 2006
On August
15, 2006, the Company issued a secured promissory note (the “August 2006 Note”)
for $250,000 to an unrelated entity (the “Holder”). On November 10,
2007, the August 2006 Note was amended (the “Amended Note”). At the
date of the amendment, the Company was obligated to pay to the Holder $262,356
which represented the principal and accrued interest, and the Holder was
entitled to purchase shares of the Company’s securities pursuant to a Warrant to
Purchase Common Stock dated August 15, 2006 (“August 2006
Warrant”). In contemplation of the completion of the reverse merger,
the Company and the Holder reached an agreement whereby this Amended Note
superseded the August 2006 Note and canceled the August 2006
Warrant. The principal amount of the Amended Note is $262,356, is
unsecured and is convertible into 6,340,029 shares of common stock of the
Company and bears interest at 4% per annum, computed on the basis of the actual
number of days elapsed and a year of 365 days. All unpaid principal,
together with the accrued but unpaid interest, shall be due and payable upon the
earlier of (i) November 9, 2010, at the written request of the holder to the
Company, or (ii) the occurrence of an event of default. At the date
of conversion, the Company determined that the Amended note had a beneficial
conversion feature with a fair value of $767,047. The Company recorded a debt
discount of $262,356 and expensed as financing costs the $504,691 of the
beneficial conversion feature that exceeded the principal balance.
Convertible Promissory Note
Issued February 19, 2009
On
February 18, 2009, the Company issued to an unrelated third party, (1) an
unsecured convertible promissory note for an aggregate principal balance of
$75,000 with a conversion price of $0.20 per share, and (2) 37,500 shares of the
Company’s restricted common stock. The interest rate on the note is
4.0% per annum and had an original maturity date of March 31, 2009, which was
subsequently amended to May 31, 2009. The Company determined the
relative fair value of the convertible promissory note and the stock on the date
of issuance. The fair value of the stock was $4,246 which was
recorded as a debt discount and was amortized over the original maturity date
and included in financing expenses in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements. As of September 30, 2009, the promissory note was in
default for non-payment; however on January 12, 2010, the Company and the note
holder agreed to settle the principal and accrued interest due for a cash
payment of $25,000 and 765,625 shares of the Company’s common
stock.
F-16
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Convertible Promissory Note
Issued March 3, 2009
On March
3, 2009, the Company issued an unsecured convertible promissory note to an
unrelated third party for an aggregate principal balance of $25,000 with a
conversion price of $0.20. The convertible promissory note was due on
April 30, 2009 and is non-interest bearing. However, the note was
subsequently amended to extend the due date to May 31, 2009. As of
September 30, 2009, the promissory note was in default for non-payment; however,
the Company and the note holder have verbally agreed to settle the principal and
accrued interest due for a cash payment of $12,500 and 156,250 shares of the
Company’s common stock.
The
Company recorded interest expense relating to the convertible promissory notes
of $12,327 and $10,056 for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
The
Company amortized $114,272 and $21,289 of the debt discount for the years ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The unamortized discount
as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, was $126,795 and $241,067,
respectively.
The
following table summarizes the convertible promissory notes:
Description
|
Balance
|
||||
Balance,
September 30, 2008, net
|
$ | 21,289 | |||
Issue
convertible note, February 19, 2009
|
75,000 | ||||
Issue
convertible note, March 3, 2009
|
25,000 | ||||
Additional
debt discounts
|
(4,245 | ) | |||
Amortization
of debt discounts
|
118,517 | ||||
Balance,
September 30, 2009, net
|
235,561 | ||||
Less,
current portion
|
(100,000 | ) | |||
Convertible
note, long term
|
$ | 135,561 |
Note
6 - Convertible Stockholder Notes
Stockholder Notes Issued
March 27, 2007
On March
27, 2007, the Company issued convertible promissory notes to two stockholders of
the Company. The principal amount of each convertible promissory note
was $20,000 for a combined total of $40,000. The convertible
promissory notes bear interest at 4% per annum, computed on the basis of the
actual number of days elapsed and a year of 365 days, and were scheduled to
mature on March 27, 2009; however, the maturity dates were extended to July 31,
2009. As of September 30, 2009, the convertible notes were in default for
non-payment; however on December 3, 2009, the note holder agreed to convert the
notes into shares of the Company’s common stock in accordance with the
conversion option provided for by the notes. All or a portion of the
outstanding principal amount and accrued interest was originally convertible at
the option of the note holder at $0.01 per share (adjusted to reflect subsequent
stock dividends, stock splits into common stock of the Company, combinations or
recapitalizations). All unpaid principal, together with any then unpaid and
accrued interest and any other amounts payable hereunder, is due and payable on
the earlier of (i) that date which is two years after the issue date listed
above, or (ii) when, upon or after the occurrence of an Event of Default as
defined in the promissory note.
F-17
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Subsequent
to issuing this convertible promissory note and prior to September 30, 2007, the
two stockholders advanced the Company an additional $6,200 each for a combined
total of $12,400. The amount due under all notes to these
stockholders at September 30, 2007, was $52,400.
On
October 25, 2007, the Company issued convertible promissory notes to the above
stockholders. Each note was for $10,000 which included the $6,200
that was previously advanced and an additional $3,800. The combined
total for the two convertible promissory notes was $20,000. The
promissory notes bear interest at 4% per annum, computed on the basis of the
actual number of days elapsed and a year of 365 days, and mature on October 25,
2009. On December 3, 2009, the note holder agreed to extend the
maturity date until such time as the Company has sufficient cash to repay these
notes.
Pursuant
to the reverse merger transaction, $40,000 (see above) of CelLynx-California
convertible notes with a conversion price of $0.01 per share were converted into
$40,000 of the Company’s convertible notes with a conversion price of
approximately $0.0079 per share, and $20,000 (see above) of CelLynx-California
convertible notes with a conversion price of $0.10 per share were converted into
$20,000 of the Company’s convertible notes with a conversion price of
approximately $0.0795 per share. With the conversion of the notes,
the Company expensed the unamortized debt discount at July 24,
2008. The fair value of the conversion liability at July 24, 2008 was
$743,163. The change in value of the convertible promissory notes
before the merger and at the merger date was $397,177, which was allocated
$60,000 to discount on notes and $337,177 as change in the conversion
liability.
Stockholder Note Issued
February 4, 2009
On
February 4, 2009, the Company issued an unsecured convertible promissory note to
a related party for an aggregate principal amount of $43,000. The
convertible promissory note has a conversion price of $0.20. The
convertible promissory note was due on March 31, 2009, and was non-interest
bearing. However, the note was subsequently amended to extend the due
date to May 31, 2009, and to accrue interest from the inception of the note at a
rate of 4.0%. As of September 30, 2009, the promissory note was in
default for non-payment; however on January 5, 2010, the Company and the note
holder agreed to settle the principal and accrued interest due for a cash
payment of $25,000 and 305,625 shares of the Company’s common
stock.
The
Company recorded interest expense related to the notes of $3,502 for the year
ended September 30, 2009.
The
Company amortized $44,882 and $64,796 of the debt discount for the years ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The unamortized discount
as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, was $1,092 and $45,974,
respectively.
F-18
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
The
following table summarizes the stockholder convertible promissory
notes:
Description
|
Balance
|
|||
Balance,
September 30, 2008, net
|
$ | 14,026 | ||
Issue
convertible note, February 4, 2009
|
43,000 | |||
Amortization
of debt discounts
|
44,882 | |||
Balance,
September 30, 2009, net
|
$ | 101,908 |
Note 7 - License Agreement
On
January 12, 2009, the Company entered into a License Agreement with an unrelated
party. The License Agreement gives the Company the right to
manufacture, have manufactured, use, import, and offer to sell, lease,
distribute or otherwise exploit the technology rights and intellectual
rights. The License Agreement has a term of ten years. As
consideration for the License Agreement, the Company issued 57,143 shares of its
common stock and paid $1,000 in cash. The Company determined the fair
value of the License Agreement to be $7,429 based on the market value of its
common stock on the date of the agreement plus the $1,000, for a total
acquisition cost of $8,429, which is included in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets and is being amortized over ten years.
The
Company recorded amortization expense related to the licensing agreement of $633
and $0 for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Note
8 - Consulting Agreement
On March
31, 2009, the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement with an outside third
party. In connection with this Consulting Agreement, the Company
issued warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of its Common Stock. The
exercise price for the warrants is as follows:
Number
of
|
|||
warrants
issued
|
Exercise
Price
|
||
300,000 |
$0.10
per share
|
||
500,000 |
$0.15
per share
|
||
600,000 |
$0.20
per share
|
||
600,000 |
$0.25
per share
|
||
2,000,000 |
F-19
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
The
vesting schedule is as follows:
Number
of
|
|||||
warrants
issued
|
Exercise
Price
|
Vesting
dates
|
|||
300,000 |
$0.10
per share
|
Immediately
|
|||
500,000 |
$0.15
per share
|
Immediately
|
|||
50,000 |
$0.20
per share
|
Immediately
|
|||
550,000 |
$0.20
per share
|
At
time of extension
|
|||
600,000 |
$0.25
per share
|
12
months after the execution of consulting agreement
|
|||
2,000,000 |
On March 31, 2009, the date of issuance, the fair value of the 850,000 vested warrants was $88,037. The fair value was computed using the Black-Scholes option pricing model under the following assumptions: (1) expected life of 3 years; (2) volatility of 110%; (3) risk free interest of 2.22% and (4) dividend rate of 0%. The Company recorded $88,037 as consulting expense on the consolidated financial statements.
At
September 30, 2009, the Company determined the fair value of the 600,000
warrants to be $60,690. The fair value was computed using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model under the following assumptions: (1) expected
life of 2.50 years; (2) volatility of 110%; (3) risk free interest of 2.22% and
(4) dividend rate of 0%. The shares vest at 12 months after the
execution of the consulting agreement; therefore, the Company will amortize the
expense over the vesting period of one year. The Company recorded
$30,345 as consulting expense for the year ended September 30, 2009 which
represents 50% of the fair value at September 30, 2009. Each quarter,
the Company will determine the fair value of the warrants and record the expense
related to the vested warrants.
Note
9 - Stockholders’ Equity
On
January 13, 2009, the Company issued 57,143 to obtain a licensing right from an
un-related party.
On
February 18, 2009, the Company issued 37,500 shares of common stock to an
unrelated third party in connection to an issuance of a convertible promissory
note agreement.
On March
16, 2009, the Company entered into a six-month consulting agreement with an
unrelated party. As compensation for the consulting services, the
Company will issue 50,000 shares per month. On May 28, 2009, the
consulting agreement was amended to obtain additional work for six
months. The Company will pay $5,000 and issue an additional 22,727
shares per month for six months. The Company can terminate the
consulting agreement upon a thirty-day written notice to the unrelated
party.
The
Company issued an additional 3,530,000 common stock for consulting services
during the third and fourth quarters of 2009.
F-20
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
On April
23, 2009, the Company entered into a Securities Issuance Agreement (“Securities
Agreement”) with four related parties (the “Investors”). Pursuant to
the Securities Agreement, the Company agreed to sell and issue to the Investors
2,785,000 shares of its common stock and warrants to purchase 2,785,000 shares
of common stock at $0.10 per share for an aggregate purchase price of
$278,500. In addition, the company agreed to sell additional common
stock and warrants at $0.10 per share up to 2 million shares. As of
September 30, 2009 the Company sold 3,785,000 shares of common stock and
warrants. The Company determined the fair value of the 3,785,000
warrants to be $512,920. The fair value was computed using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model under the following assumptions: (1) expected
life of 3 years; (2) volatility of 110%; (3) risk free interest of 1.16% - 1.97%
and (4) dividend rate of 0%. The warrants are exercisable immediately
and have an exercise price based on the share price at the date of
grant.
On May 1,
2009, as part of the Securities Agreement, the Company accepted the resignations
of Mr. Legendre as Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company,
and of Mr. Risheq as an officer of the Company. The Company agreed
that all of Mr. Legendre’s 12,234,608 options would be immediately
canceled. As full compensation for his services to the Company
to date, he would receive 2,000,000 shares of common stock. In
addition, the Company agreed that all of Mr. Risheq’s 9,645,889 options would be
immediately canceled. As full compensation for his services to the
Company to date, he would receive 1,500,000 shares of common stock.
On May 6,
2009, the Company entered into a one year agreement with its new Executive
Chairman that provides for monthly payments of $10,000 and the issuance of
100,000 options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for $0.16 per
share.
As of
September 30, 2009 the Company issued 400,000 shares of common stock for
accounting services.
During
the fourth quarter, the Company entered into stock subscription agreements and
issued a total of 3,060,000 shares of common stock for $334,500.
Stock
Options
On
December 3, 2007, the Board of Directors adopted the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan
(the “Plan”) of CelLynx, Inc. All of the Company’s employees,
officers, directors, consultants and advisors are eligible to be granted
options, restricted stock awards, or other stock-based awards under the
Plan. The Plan is administered by the Board. The Board
shall have authority to grant awards and to adopt, amend and repeal such
administrative rules, guidelines and practices relating to the Plan as it shall
deem advisable. Subject to certain adjustments, awards may be made
under the Plan for up to 25,000,000 shares of common stock of the
Company. The Board shall establish the exercise price at the time
each option is granted. In July 2008, the Company amended to increase
the number of awards from 25,000,000 to 75,000,000.
F-21
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
The
following table summarizes information with respect to options issuable under
the Plan and outside the Plan.
Number of
Shares
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Aggregate
Intrinisic
Value
|
|||||||||
Outstanding, October 11, 2005 (date of inception) | - | ||||||||||
Granted | 5,660,682 | $ | 0.015 | ||||||||
Forfeited | (4,245,512 | ) | |||||||||
Exercised | - | ||||||||||
Outstanding, September 30, 2006 | 1,415,170 | $ | 0.015 | ||||||||
Granted | - | ||||||||||
Canceled | - | ||||||||||
Exercised | - | ||||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2007 | 1,415,170 | $ | 0.015 | ||||||||
Granted | 52,486,693 | $ | 0.075 | ||||||||
Canceled | - | ||||||||||
Exercised | - | ||||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2008 | 53,901,863 | $ | 0.072 | ||||||||
Granted | 9,546,081 | $ | 0.158 | ||||||||
Canceled | (35,734,111 | ) | $ | 0.074 | |||||||
Exercised | - | ||||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2009 | 27,713,833 | $ | 0.102 | $ | 2,227,543 | ||||||
Exercisable at September 30, 2009 | 10,502,335 | $ | 0.075 | $ | 1,109,850 |
F-22
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
The
number and weighted average exercise prices of all options outstanding as of
September 30, 2009, are as follows:
Options outstanding | ||||||||||||||
Range of
Exercise
Price
|
Number
Outstanding
September
30, 2009
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
(Years)
|
|||||||||||
$ | 0.014 | 943,447 | $ | 0.014 | 6.08 | |||||||||
$ | 0.016 | 471,723 | $ | 0.016 | 6.25 | |||||||||
$ | 0.072 | 3,339,944 | $ | 0.072 | 3.71 | |||||||||
$ | 0.079 | 13,412,638 | $ | 0.079 | 3.42 | |||||||||
$ | 0.110 | 1,414,960 | $ | 0.110 | 4.35 | |||||||||
$ | 0.120 | 2,032,520 | $ | 0.120 | 4.29 | |||||||||
$ | 0.160 | 1,408,961 | $ | 0.160 | 4.60 | |||||||||
$ | 0.170 | 2,900,000 | $ | 0.170 | 4.98 | |||||||||
$ | 0.180 | 48,000 | $ | 0.180 | 4.20 | |||||||||
$ | 0.210 | 1,500,000 | $ | 0.210 | 4.85 | |||||||||
$ | 0.260 | 241,640 | $ | 0.260 | 4.68 | |||||||||
27,713,833 |
F-23
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
The
number and weighted average exercise prices of all options exercisable as of
September 30, 2009, are as follows:
Options outstanding | ||||||||||||||
Range of
Exercise
Price
|
Options
exercisable
September
30, 2009
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
(Years)
|
|||||||||||
$ | 0.014 | 943,447 | $ | 0.014 | 6.08 | |||||||||
$ | 0.016 | 471,723 | $ | 0.016 | 6.25 | |||||||||
$ | 0.072 | 1,451,490 | $ | 0.072 | 3.68 | |||||||||
$ | 0.079 | 6,867,921 | $ | 0.079 | 3.36 | |||||||||
$ | 0.110 | 267,540 | $ | 0.110 | 4.40 | |||||||||
$ | 0.120 | 20,054 | $ | 0.120 | 4.43 | |||||||||
$ | 0.160 | 276,161 | $ | 0.160 | 4.60 | |||||||||
$ | 0.180 | 48,000 | $ | 0.180 | 4.20 | |||||||||
$ | 0.210 | 28,295 | $ | 0.210 | 4.85 | |||||||||
$ | 0.260 | 127,704 | $ | 0.260 | 4.68 | |||||||||
10,502,335 |
The
assumptions used in calculating the fair values of options granted using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model are as follows:
September
30, 2009
|
September
30, 2008
|
|||||
Expected
life (years)
|
2.63
to 6.16
|
2.6
to 4.0
|
||||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
.56%
to 4.57%
|
1.9%
to 4.1%
|
||||
Expected
volatility
|
110% | 100% | ||||
Expected
dividend yield
|
0% | 0% |
The weighted average grant-date fair value for the options granted during the year ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, was $0.076 and $0.06, respectively.
The
compensation expense related to the unvested options as of September 30, 2009,
was $1,359,254, which will be recognized over the weighted average period of
2.26 years. Stock-based compensation expense to employees and non employees for
the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, was $690,353 and $2,625,106,
respectively.
F-24
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Warrants
On July
23, 2008, the Company issued warrants to purchase 10,500,000 shares of its
common stock at an exercise price of $0.20. The Warrants expire on
July 22, 2010, except in the event that at any time the Company has manufactured
25 or more of its mobile or home repeater units, then the Company may, at its
option, accelerate the expiration of the warrants by giving notice to the
holder. If the holder does not exercise the warrant within 30 days of
the giving of the notice of acceleration, the warrants will expire and the
holder will have no further rights to acquire any shares of the company under
the warrants. The Company gave notice of acceleration on February 27,
2009. The Company canceled the 10,500,000 warrants as none of them
had been exercised within the required 30 days.
The
following table summarizes the warrant activity for the year ended September 30,
2009:
Number
of
warrants
issued
|
|||||
Outstanding,
September 30, 2008
|
10,500,000 | ||||
Granted
|
5,785,000 | ||||
Cancelled
|
(10,500,000 | ) | |||
Exercised
|
- | ||||
Outstanding,
September 30,2009
|
5,785,000 |
Note 10 - Commitments and Contingencies
Operating
Leases
On
February 21, 2008, the Company entered into a one-year lease for office space
for its El Dorado Hills, California, office, which was subsequently amended to
extend the lease term to March 31, 2010. The lease requires monthly
payments of $2,198. On August 26, 2008, the Company entered into an
eighteen-month lease for office space for its Mission Viejo, California, office
beginning on October 1, 2008 and expiring on March 31, 2010. The
lease requires monthly payments of $4,664.
The
Company recorded rent expense of $77,780 and $13,188 for years ended September
30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The
Company expects to pay approximately $41,200 during the year ended September 30,
2010 for the two leases.
Litigation
The
Company is subject to various legal matters in the ordinary course of
business. After taking into consideration the Company’s legal
counsels’ evaluation of these matters, the Company has determined that the
resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
F-25
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Note
11 - Taxes
We have
provided no current income taxes due to the losses incurred from October 11,
2005 (date of inception), through September 30, 2009. Net operating
losses of approximately $3,877,145 at September 30, 2009, are
available for carryover. The net operating losses will expire
from 2022 through 2024. We have provided a 100%
valuation allowance for the deferred tax benefit resulting from the net
operating loss carryover due to our limited operating history. In
addressing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers
whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax
assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax
assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the
periods in which those temporary differences are deductible. When we
demonstrate a history of profitable operation, we will reduce our valuation
allowance at that time.
A
reconciliation of the statutory Federal income tax rate and the effective income
tax rate for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
follows:
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Statutory
federal income tax rate
|
(0.34 | ) | (0.34 | ) | ||||
State
income taxes (benefit), net of federal taxes
|
(0.06 | ) | (0.06 | ) | ||||
Equity
instruments issued for compensation/services
|
0.15 | 0.19 | ||||||
Change
in derivative liabilities
|
0.02 | 0.06 | ||||||
Non-cash
financing costs
|
- | 0.05 | ||||||
Valuation
allowance
|
0.23 | 0.10 | ||||||
Effective
income tax rate
|
- | - |
The significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Deferred tax assets: | ||||||||
Net operating loss carryforwards | $ | 1,694,205 | $ | 836,646 | ||||
Valuation allowance | (1,694,205 | ) | (836,646 | ) | ||||
Net deferred tax assets | $ | - | $ | - |
Note
12 - Subsequent Events
On
October 13, 2009, the Company received $50,000 from an unrelated party for a
subscription agreement at $0.10 per share for a total of 500,000
shares.
On
October 22, 2009, the Company received $140,000 from an unrelated party for a
subscription agreement at $0.10 per share for a total of 1,400,000
shares.
F-26
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
On
November 12, 2009, the Company received $10,000 from an unrelated party for a
subscription agreement at $0.10 per share for a total of 100,000
shares.
On
December 4, 2009, the Company received $110,000 from an unrelated party for a
subscription agreement at $0.06 per share for a total of 1,833,333
shares. The Company also issued warrants to purchase up to an
additional 1,833,333 shares.
On
December 7, 2009, the Company received $105,000 from an unrelated party for a
subscription agreement at $0.06 per share for a total of 1,750,000
shares. The Company also issued warrants to purchase up to an
additional 1,750,000 shares.
On
December 9, 2009, the Company received $110,000 from an unrelated party for a
subscription agreement at $0.06 per share for a total of 1,833,333
shares. The Company also issued warrants to purchase up to an
additional 1,833,333 shares.
On
December 9, 2009, the Company received $55,000 from an unrelated party for a
subscription agreement at $0.06 per share for a total of 916,667
shares. The Company also issued warrants to purchase up to an
additional 966,667 shares.
On
December 15, 2009, the Company received $18,000 from an unrelated party for a
subscription agreement at $0.06 per share for a total of 300,000
shares. The Company also issued warrants to purchase up to an
additional 300,000 shares.
On
December 15, 2009, the Company received $10,000 from an unrelated party for a
subscription agreement at $0.06 per share for a total of 166,667
shares. The Company also issued warrants to purchase up to an
additional 166,667 shares.
On
December 28, 2009, the Company received $10,000 from an unrelated party for a
subscription agreement at $0.06 per share for a total of 166,667
shares. The Company also issued warrants to purchase up to an
additional 166,667 shares.
On
January 7, 2010, the Company received $5,000 from an unrelated party for a
subscription agreement at $0.06 per share for a total of 83,335
shares. The Company also issued warrants to purchase up to an
additional 83,335 shares.
On
January 8, 2010, the Company received $250,000 from an unrelated party for a
subscription agreement at $0.06 per share for a total of 4,166,667
shares. The Company also issued warrants to purchase up to an
additional 4,166,667 shares.
F-27
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
On
January 12, 2010, the Company received $450,000 from an unrelated party for a
subscription agreement at $0.06 per share for a total of 7,500,000
shares. The Company also issued warrants to purchase up to an
additional 7,500,000 shares.
On
January 12, 2010, the Company received $60,000 from an unrelated party for a
subscription agreement at $0.06 per share for a total of 1,000,000
shares. The Company also issued warrants to purchase up to an
additional 1,000,000 shares.
The
Company has performed an evaluation of subsequent events through January 13,
2010, which is the date the consolidated financial statements were issued and no
additional significant subsequent events warrant disclosure.
F-28
CelLynx
Group, Inc.
Consolidated
Financial Statements
Contents
Page
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and September 30,
2009
|
Q-2
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended December
30, 2009 and 2008
|
Q-3
|
Consolidated
Statements Of Stockholders’ Deficit for the three
months Ended December 30, 2009
|
Q-4
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended December
30, 2009 and 2008
|
Q-5
|
Notes
To Financial Statements
|
Q-6
|
Q-1
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
December
31,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2009
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 28,316 | $ | 6,776 | ||||
Accounts
receivable
|
6,171 | - | ||||||
Inventory
|
43,554 | 16,316 | ||||||
Prepaids
and the other current assets
|
114,713 | 15,750 | ||||||
TOTAL
CURRENT ASSETS
|
192,754 | 38,842 | ||||||
EQUIPMENT,
net
|
10,031 | 11,359 | ||||||
INTANGIBLE
ASSETS, net
|
104,072 | 97,180 | ||||||
OTHER
ASSETS
|
16,190 | 16,190 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 323,047 | $ | 163,571 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$ | 977,522 | $ | 832,634 | ||||
Accrued
interest
|
46,325 | 28,334 | ||||||
Convertible
stockholder notes, net of debt discount of $0 and $1,092
|
||||||||
as
of December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, respectively
|
103,000 | 101,908 | ||||||
Convertible
promissory notes, net of debt discount of $97,992 and $0
|
||||||||
as
of December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, respectively
|
264,364 | 100,000 | ||||||
TOTAL
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
1,391,211 | 1,062,876 | ||||||
LONG
TERM LIABILITIES:
|
||||||||
Convertible
promissory note, net of debt discount
of $126,795
|
||||||||
as
of September 30, 2009
|
- | 135,561 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
|
1,391,211 | 1,198,437 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS'
DEFICIT:
|
||||||||
Series
A preferred stock, $0.001 par value;100,000,000 shares
authorized;
|
||||||||
nil
shares issued and outstanding
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
stock, $0.001 par value, 400,000,000 shares authorized; 146,418,790
and
|
||||||||
137,379,397
shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2009 and
|
||||||||
September
30, 2009, respectively
|
146,419 | 137,379 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
11,294,129 | 10,501,965 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(12,508,712 | ) | (11,674,210 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders' deficit
|
(1,068,164 | ) | (1,034,866 | ) | ||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
$ | 323,047 | $ | 163,571 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
Q-2
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three
Months Ended
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|||||||
December
31, 2009
|
December
31,2008
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
(unaudited)
|
|||||||
Net
Revenue
|
$ | 11,820 | $ | - | ||||
Cost
of Revenue
|
9,559 | - | ||||||
Gross
profit
|
2,261 | - | ||||||
Operating
expenses
|
||||||||
Research
and development
|
22,604 | 151,527 | ||||||
General
and administrative
|
766,280 | 621,813 | ||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
788,884 | 773,340 | ||||||
Loss
from operations
|
(786,623 | ) | (773,340 | ) | ||||
Non-operating
income (expense):
|
||||||||
Interest
and financing costs, net
|
(47,879 | ) | (50,042 | ) | ||||
Change
in fair value of accrued beneficial conversion liability
|
- | 251,410 | ||||||
Change
in fair value of accrued warrant liability
|
- | (419,571 | ) | |||||
Total
non-operating expense, net
|
(47,879 | ) | (218,203 | ) | ||||
Loss
before provision for income taxes
|
(834,502 | ) | (991,543 | ) | ||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
- | - | ||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (834,502 | ) | $ | (991,543 | ) | ||
Weighted
average shares outstanding - Basic and Diluted:
|
140,714,212 | 107,268,745 | ||||||
Earnings
per share - Basic and Diluted:
|
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Q-3
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
Stock
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-in
|
Accumulated
|
Total Stockholders' |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Deficit
|
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
September 30, 2007
|
41,107,396 | $ | 41,107 | 27,153,988 | $ | 27,154 | $ | 648,022 | $ | (1,036,912 | ) | $ | (320,629 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Shares
issued for cash
|
- | - | 938,897 | 939 | 745,345 | - | 746,284 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
issued for services
|
4,408,638 | 4,409 | 4,362,037 | 4,362 | 563,231 | - | 572,002 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fair
value of stock options reclassified to share-based compensation
liability
|
- | - | - | - | (89,618 | ) | - | (89,618 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Shares
issued in merger with Norpac Technologies, Inc.
|
- | - | 48,097,890 | 48,098 | 1,200,650 | 1,248,748 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair
value of warrants transferred to liability
|
- | - | - | - | (731,681 | ) | - | (731,681 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | - | - | (6,658,536 | ) | (6,658,536 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
September 30, 2008
|
45,516,034 | $ | 45,516 | 80,552,812 | $ | 80,553 | $ | 2,335,949 | $ | (7,695,448 | ) | $ | (5,233,430 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Conversion
of preferred stock to common stock upon the increase of authorized
shares
|
(45,516,034 | ) | (45,516 | ) | 45,516,034 | 45,516 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
of share based compensation liability to equity
|
- | - | - | - | 2,701,572 | - | 2,701,572 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fair
value of share based compensation for employees and
consultants
|
- | - | - | - | 690,353 | - | 690,353 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
of beneficial conversion liability to equity
|
- | - | - | - | 2,120,181 | - | 2,120,181 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
of warrant liability to equity
|
- | - | - | - | 1,023,564 | - | 1,023,564 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock for the purchase of licensing rights
|
- | - | 57,143 | 57 | 7,372 | - | 7,429 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock for promissory note
|
- | - | 37,500 | 38 | 4,208 | - | 4,246 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of warrants for consulting services
|
- | - | - | - | 118,382 | - | 118,382 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock for accounting services
|
- | - | 400,000 | 400 | 71,600 | - | 72,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock for consulting services
|
- | - | 3,970,908 | 3,971 | 722,628 | - | 726,599 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock for cash
|
- | - | 6,845,000 | 6,844 | 706,156 | - | 713,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | - | - | (3,978,762 | ) | (3,978,762 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
September 30, 2009
|
- | $ | - | 137,379,397 | $ | 137,379 | $ | 10,501,965 | $ | (11,674,210 | ) | $ | (1,034,866 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Fair value of share based compensation for employees and consultants | - | - | - | - | 170,182 | - | 170,182 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of warrants for consulting services | - | - | - | - | 13,822 | - | 13,822 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock for consulting services | - | - | 72,727 | 73 | 9,927 | - | 10,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock for cash | - | - | 8,966,666 | 8,967 | 598,233 | - | 607,200 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | - | - | - | - | - | (834,502 | ) | (834,502 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2009 (unaudited) | - | $ | - | 146,418,790 | $ | 146,419 | $ | 11,294,129 | $ | (12,508,712 | ) | $ | (1,068,164 | ) |
Effective
July 24, 2008, the Company effected a 1.2579 for 1 forward stock split of the
authorized, issued and outstanding common stock, without change to par value.
All share amounts
have been retroactively adjusted for all periods presented.
Effective
July 24, 2008, the Company issued Series A Preferred Stock on a pro rata basis
to the shareholders of CelLynx, Inc. All share amounts have been
retroactively adjusted
for all periods presented.
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
Q-4
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Three
Months Ended
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|||||||
December
31, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
(unaudited)
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (834,502 | ) | $ | (991,543 | ) | ||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
1,844 | 1,159 | ||||||
Warrants
issued for services
|
13,822 | - | ||||||
Stock
issued for services
|
10,000 | - | ||||||
Stock
compensation expense for options issued to employees and
consultants
|
170,182 | 122,867 | ||||||
Change
in fair value of accrued beneficial conversion liability
|
- | (251,410 | ) | |||||
Change
in fair value of accrued warrant liability
|
- | 419,571 | ||||||
Amortization
of debt discount
|
29,895 | 47,779 | ||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Change
in accounts receivable
|
(6,171 | ) | - | |||||
Change
in inventory
|
(27,238 | ) | - | |||||
Change
in other assets
|
13,062 | (4,664 | ) | |||||
Change
in accounts payable, accrued expenses and accrued interest
|
45,021 | 96,951 | ||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(584,085 | ) | (559,290 | ) | ||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Purchase
of equipment
|
- | (4,263 | ) | |||||
Purchase
of intangible assets
|
(1,575 | ) | (7,755 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(1,575 | ) | (12,018 | ) | ||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
618,000 | - | ||||||
Payment
of offering costs associated with the sale of common
stock
|
(10,800 | ) | - | |||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
607,200 | - | ||||||
NET
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
|
21,540 | (571,308 | ) | |||||
CASH,
BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
6,776 | 599,024 | ||||||
CASH,
END OF PERIOD
|
$ | 28,316 | $ | 27,716 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING:
|
||||||||
Reclassification
of share-based compensation liability to additional paid-in
capital
|
$ | - | $ | 2,701,572 | ||||
Reclassification
of accrued beneficial conversion liability to additional paid-in
capital
|
$ | - | $ | 2,120,181 | ||||
Reclassification
of accrued warrant liability to additional paid-in capital
|
$ | - | $ | 1,023,564 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Q-5
Note
1 - Organization
The
unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared by CelLynx Group,
Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities
and Exchange Commission. The information furnished herein reflects all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments) which are,
in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly present the operating results
for the respective periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures
normally present in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K. The results for the three months ended December 31, 2009,
are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year
ending September 30, 2010.
Organization and Line of
Business
CelLynx
Group, Inc., formerly known as NorPac Technologies, Inc. (hereinafter referred
to as “CelLynx” or the “Company”), was originally incorporated under the laws of
the State of Minnesota on April 1, 1998.
On July
23, 2008, prior to the closing of the Share Exchange Agreement (described
below), the Company entered into a Regulation S Subscription Agreement pursuant
to which the Company issued 10,500,000 shares of its common stock and warrants
to purchase 10,500,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.20 per
share to non-U.S. persons for an aggregate purchase price of
$1,575,000.
On July
24, 2008, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement, as amended, with
CelLynx, Inc. a California corporation ("CelLynx-California") and twenty-three
(23) CelLynx-California shareholders who, immediately prior to the closing of
the transaction collectively held 100% of CelLynx-California’s issued and
outstanding shares of capital stock. As a result, the
CelLynx-California shareholders were to receive 77,970,956 shares of the
Company’s common stock in exchange for 100%, or 61,983,580 shares, of capital
stock of CelLynx-California’s common stock. However, the Company had
only 41,402,110 authorized, unissued and unreserved shares of common stock
available, after taking into account the shares of common stock issued in the
July 23, 2008, financing described above. Pursuant to the Share
Exchange Agreement, in the event that there was an insufficient number of
authorized but unissued and unreserved common stock to complete the transaction,
the Company was to issue all of the available authorized but unissued and
unreserved common stock to the CelLynx-California shareholders in a pro rata
manner and then establish a class of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
(“Series A Preferred Stock”) and issue that number of shares of Series A
Preferred Stock such that the common stock underlying the Series A Preferred
Stock plus the common stock actually issued to the CelLynx-California
shareholders would equal the total number of shares of common stock due to the
CelLynx-California shareholders under the Share Exchange
Agreement. As a result, the Company issued to the CelLynx-California
shareholders an aggregate of 32,454,922 shares of common stock and 45,516,034
shares of Series A Preferred Stock. The Series A Preferred Stock
automatically would convert into common stock on a one-to-one ratio upon the
authorized capital stock of the Company being increased to include not less than
150,000,000 shares of common stock.
On
November 7, 2008, the Company amended the Articles of Incorporation to increase
the number of authorized shares to 400,000,000 and converted the 45,516,034
shares of Series A Preferred Stock into 45,516,034 shares of the Company’s
common stock.
The
exchange of shares with CelLynx-California was accounted for as a reverse
acquisition under the purchase method of accounting because the shareholders of
CelLynx-California obtained control of the Company. On August 5, 2008, NorPac
Technologies, Inc., changed its name to CelLynx Group,
Inc. Accordingly, the merger of CelLynx-California into the Company
was recorded as a recapitalization of CelLynx-California, with
CelLynx-California being treated as the continuing entity. The historical
financial statements presented are the financial statements of
CelLynx-California. The Share Exchange Agreement has been treated as a
recapitalization and not as a business combination; therefore, no pro forma
information is disclosed. At the date of this transaction, the net assets of the
legal acquirer CelLynx Group, Inc., were $1,248,748.
As a
result of the reverse merger transactions described above, the historical
financial statements presented are those of CelLynx-California, the operating
entity. Each CelLynx-California shareholder received 1.2579292 shares
of stock in the Company for each share of CelLynx-California capital
stock. All shares and per-share information have been retroactively
restated for all periods presented to reflect the reverse merger
transaction.
On
October 27, 2008, the Board of Directors approved a change of the Company’s
fiscal year end from June 30 to September 30 to agree with the fiscal year of
CelLynx-California. The fiscal year end change was effective for the
year ended September 30, 2008.
The
Company develops and manufactures a cell phone signal amplifier.
Q-6
Going Concern and Exiting Development Stage
These
consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis,
which implies the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its
liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company is unlikely to pay
dividends or generate significant earnings in the immediate or foreseeable
future. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the
continued financial support from its stockholders, the ability of the Company to
obtain necessary equity and debt financing to continue operations and to
generate sustainable revenue. There is no guarantee that the Company will be
able to raise adequate equity or debt financing or generate profitable
operations. For the three months ended December 31, 2009, the Company incurred a
net loss of $834,502. As of December 31, 2009, the Company has an
accumulated deficit of $12,508,712. These consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and
classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that
might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going
concern. During the three months ended December 31, 2009, the Company
raised $618,000 through the issuance of common stock, and management intends to
raise additional funds through equity or debt financing and to generate cash
from the sale of the Company’s product.
The
Company was in the development stage through June 30, 2009. In July
2009, the Company received the first 220 units from its
manufacturer. As of July 2009, the Company was fully operational and
as such was no longer considered a development stage company. During
the period that the Company was considered a development stage company, the
Company incurred accumulated losses of approximately $10,948,625.
Q-7
Note
2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of
Presentation
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of CelLynx Group, Inc., and its 100% wholly owned subsidiary,
CelLynx, Inc. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated within the consolidation.
Cash
Cash and
cash equivalents include cash in hand and cash in time deposits, certificates of
deposit and all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three
months or less.
Inventory
Inventory
consists of finished goods ready for sale and is valued at the lower of cost
(determined on a first-in, first-out basis) or market.
Accounts
Receivable
The
Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses for accounts receivable.
Management reviews the composition of accounts receivable and analyzes
historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit worthiness,
current economic trends and changes in customer payment patterns to evaluate the
adequacy of these reserves. Reserves are recorded based on the Company’s
historical collection history. Receivables are written off when they
are determined to be uncollectible. As of December 31, 2009, the
Company did not record an allowance for bad debt.
Use of
Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Concentration of Credit
Risk
Cash
includes deposits in accounts maintained in the United States. Certain financial
instruments, which subject the Company to concentration of credit risk, consist
of cash. The Company maintains balances at financial institutions which, from
time to time, may exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limits
for the banks located in the United States. As of December 31, 2009, and
September 30, 2009, the Company did not have any deposits in excess of federally
insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and
believes it is not exposed to any significant risks on its cash in bank
accounts.
Equipment
Equipment
is recorded at historical cost and is depreciated using the straight-line method
over their estimated useful lives. The useful life and depreciation
method are reviewed periodically to ensure that the depreciation method and
period are consistent with the anticipated pattern of future economic benefits.
Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred
while renewals and betterments are capitalized. Gains and losses on disposals
are included in the results of operations. The useful life of the equipment is
being depreciated over three years.
Q-8
Intangible Assets
Acquired
patents, licensing rights and trademarks are capitalized at their acquisition
cost or fair value. The legal costs, patent registration fees, and models and
drawings required for filing patent applications are capitalized if they relate
to commercially viable technologies. Commercially viable technologies are those
technologies that are projected to generate future positive cash flows in the
near term. Legal costs associated with applications that are not determined to
be commercially viable are expensed as incurred. All research and development
costs incurred in developing the patentable idea are expensed as incurred. Legal
fees from the costs incurred in successful defense to the extent of an evident
increase in the value of the patents are capitalized.
Capitalized
costs for patents are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining
twenty-year legal life of each patent after the costs have been incurred. Once
each patent or trademark is issued, capitalized costs are amortized on a
straight-line basis over a period not to exceed 20 years and 10 years,
respectively. The licensing right is amortized on a straight-line over a period
of 10 years.
Impairment or Disposal of
Long-lived Assets
The
Company applies the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)
Topic 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment,” which addresses financial
accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets.
ASC 360 requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in
operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash
flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’
carrying amounts. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by
which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the long-lived assets. Loss
on long-lived assets to be disposed of is determined in a similar manner, except
that fair values are reduced for the cost of disposal. Based on its review, the
Company believes that as of December 31, 2009, and September 30, 2009, there was
no significant impairment of its long-lived assets.
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company's revenue recognition policies are in compliance with ASC Topic 605,
“Revenue Recognition.” Revenue is recognized at the date of shipment
to customers, and when the price is fixed or determinable, the delivery is
completed, no other significant obligations of the Company exist and
collectability is reasonably assured.
Fair Value of Financial
Instruments
For
certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash, accounts
receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and convertible debt, the
carrying amounts approximate their fair values due to their short maturities. In
addition, the Company has long-term debt with financial institutions. The
carrying amounts of the long-term liabilities approximate their fair values
based on current rates of interest for instruments with similar
characteristics.
ASC Topic
820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” requires disclosure of the fair
value of financial instruments held by the Company. ASC Topic 825,
“Financial Instruments,” defines fair value, and establishes a three-level
valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement that enhances
disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The carrying amounts
reported in the consolidated balance sheets for receivables and current
liabilities each qualify as financial instruments and are a reasonable estimate
of their fair values because of the short period of time between the origination
of such instruments and their expected realization and their current market rate
of interest. The three levels of the valuation hierarchy are defined as
follows:
● |
Level
1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices for identical
assets or liabilities in active markets.
|
|
● |
Level
2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar
assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for
substantially the full term of the financial
instrument.
|
|
● |
Level
3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to
the fair value
measurement.
|
Q-9
As of
December 31, 2009, the Company did not identify any assets and liabilities that
are required to be presented on the balance sheet at fair value.
Income
Taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income
Taxes.” ASC 740 requires a company to use the asset and liability method of
accounting for income taxes, whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for
deductible temporary differences, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized
for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences
between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases.
Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of
management, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of, the
deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on
the date of enactment.
Under ASC
740, a tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than
not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax
examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount
of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination.
For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is
recorded. The adoption had no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
Net Loss Per
Share
The
Company reports loss per share in accordance with the ASC Topic 260, “Earnings
Per Share.” Basic earnings per share is based upon the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per
share is based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock
warrants were converted or exercised. Diluted net loss per share is
computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding during the period, plus the potential dilutive
effect of common shares issuable upon exercise or conversion of outstanding
stock options and warrants during the period. Due to the net loss for
the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, none of the potential
dilutive securities have been included in the calculation of dilutive earning
per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive.
Stock-Based
Compensation
The
Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718,
“Compensation – Stock Compensation.” ASC 718 requires companies to
measure compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation at fair value at
the grant date and recognize the expense over the employee’s requisite service
period. Under ASC 718, the Company’s volatility is based on the historical
volatility of the Company’s stock or the expected volatility of similar
companies. The expected life assumption is primarily based on historical
exercise
patterns and employee post-vesting termination behavior. The risk-free interest
rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield
curve in effect at the time of grant.
The
Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model which was developed for use
in estimating the fair value of options. Option-pricing models require the input
of highly complex and subjective variables including the expected life of
options granted and the Company’s expected stock price volatility over a period
equal to or greater than the expected life of the options. Because changes in
the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimated value of the
Company’s employee stock options, it is management’s opinion that the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model may not provide an accurate measure of the
fair value of the Company’s employee stock options. Although the fair value of
employee stock options is determined in accordance with ASC 718 using an
option-pricing model, that value may not be indicative of the fair value
observed in a willing buyer/seller market transaction.
The
Company recognizes in the statement of operations the grant-date fair value of
stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees and
non-employees.
Q-10
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June
2008, FASB issued ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging,” which provides a
two-step model to determine whether a financial instrument or an embedded
feature is indexed to an issuer’s own stock and thus able to qualify for the
scope exception in ASC 815-10-15-74. This standard is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. This standard triggers liability accounting on all instruments
and embedded features exercisable at strike prices denominated in any currency
other than the functional currency of the operating entity. The
adoption of this pronouncement did not have an impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
In
October 2009, the FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) regarding
accounting for own-share lending arrangements in contemplation of convertible
debt issuance or other financing. This ASU requires that at the date
of issuance of the shares in a share-lending arrangement entered into in
contemplation of a convertible debt offering or other financing, the shares
issued shall be measured at fair value and be recognized as an issuance cost,
with an offset to additional paid-in capital. Further, loaned shares are
excluded from basic and diluted earnings per share unless default of the
share-lending arrangement occurs, at which time the loaned shares would be
included in the basic and diluted earnings-per-share
calculation. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning on or
after December 15, 2009, and interim periods within those fiscal years for
arrangements outstanding as of the beginning of those fiscal years. The Company
is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial
statements.
On
December 15, 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures Topic 820 “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements.” This ASU requires some new disclosures and clarifies
some existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement as set forth
in Codification Subtopic 820-10. The FASB’s objective is to improve these
disclosures and, thus, increase the transparency in financial
reporting. The adoption of this ASU will not have a material impact
on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Q-11
Note
3 - Equipment
Equipment
consisted of the following at December 31, 2009, and September 30,
2009:
December
31,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2009
|
||||||||
(unaudited)
|
|||||||||
Office
furniture and equipment
|
$ | 9,879 | $ | 9,879 | |||||
Computer
equipment
|
8,930 | 8,930 | |||||||
18,809 | 18,809 | ||||||||
Accumulated
depreciation
|
(8,778 | ) | (7,450 | ) | |||||
Equipment,
net
|
$ | 10,031 | $ | 11,359 |
The
Company recorded depreciation expense of $1,328 and $854, for the three months
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Note
4 - Intangible Assets
The
Company incurred legal costs in acquiring patent and trademark rights. These
costs are projected to generate future positive cash flows in the near term and
have been capitalized to intangible assets in the period incurred. Once each
patent or trademark is issued, capitalized costs are amortized on a
straight-line basis over a period not to exceed 20 years and 10 years,
respectively.
Intangible
assets consist of the following:
December
31,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2009
|
||||||||
(unaudited)
|
|||||||||
Patents
|
$ | 86,132 | $ | 78,724 | |||||
Trademarks
|
12,487 | 12,487 | |||||||
Licensing
right
|
8,429 | 8,429 | |||||||
107,048 | 99,640 | ||||||||
Accumulated
Amortization
|
(2,976 | ) | (2,460 | ) | |||||
Intangibles,
net
|
$ | 104,072 | $ | 97,180 |
The
Company recorded amortization expense related to the trademarks of $516 and
$305, for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
No
amortization has been recorded for the patents as of December 31, 2009, as the
patents have not been issued to the Company.
Q-12
The
following table summarizes the amortization over the next 5 years:
Years
ended September 30,
|
Amount
|
|||||
2010
|
$ | 1,249 | ||||
2011
|
1,249 | |||||
2012
|
1,249 | |||||
2013
|
1,249 | |||||
2014
|
1,249 | |||||
Thereafter | 4,369 |
Note 5 - Convertible Promissory Note
Convertible Promissory Note
Issued August 15, 2006
On August
15, 2006, the Company issued a secured promissory note (the “August 2006 Note”)
for $250,000 to an unrelated entity (the “Holder”). On November 10,
2007, the August 2006 Note was amended (the “Amended Note”). At the
date of the amendment, the Company was obligated to pay to the Holder $262,356
which represented the principal and accrued interest, and the Holder was
entitled to purchase shares of the Company’s securities pursuant to a Warrant to
Purchase Common Stock dated August 15, 2006 (“August 2006
Warrant”). In contemplation of the completion of the reverse merger,
the Company and the Holder reached an agreement whereby this Amended Note
superseded the August 2006 Note and canceled the August 2006
Warrant. The principal amount of the Amended Note is $262,356, is
unsecured and is convertible into 6,340,029 shares of common stock of the
Company and bears interest at 4% per annum, computed on the basis of the actual
number of days elapsed and a year of 365 days. All unpaid principal,
together with the accrued but unpaid interest, shall be due and payable upon the
earlier of (i) November 9, 2010, at the written request of the holder to the
Company, or (ii) the occurrence of an event of default. At the date
of conversion, the Company determined that the Amended note had a beneficial
conversion feature with a fair value of $767,047. The Company recorded a debt
discount of $262,356 and expensed as financing costs the $504,691 of the
beneficial conversion feature that exceeded the principal balance.
Convertible Promissory Note
Issued February 19, 2009
On
February 19, 2009, the Company issued to an unrelated third party, (1) an
unsecured convertible promissory note for an aggregate principal balance of
$75,000 with a conversion price of $0.20 per share, and (2) 37,500 shares of the
Company’s restricted common stock. The interest rate on the note is
4.0% per annum and had an original maturity date of March 31, 2009, which was
subsequently amended to May 31, 2009. The Company determined the
relative fair value of the convertible promissory note and the stock on the date
of issuance. The fair value of the stock was $4,246 which was
recorded as a debt discount and was amortized over the original maturity date
and included in financing expenses in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements. As of December 31, 2009, the promissory note was in
default for non-payment; however on January 12, 2010, the Company and the note
holder agreed to a settlement. The interest rate was adjusted to 15%
retroactive to the issuance date, and the principal and accrued interest for one
year would be settled for a cash payment of $25,000 and 765,625 shares of the
Company’s common stock.
Convertible Promissory Note
Issued March 3, 2009
On March
3, 2009, the Company issued an unsecured convertible promissory note to an
unrelated third party for an aggregate principal balance of $25,000 with a
conversion price of $0.20. The convertible promissory note was due on
April 30, 2009, and is non-interest bearing. However, the note was
subsequently amended to extend the due date to May 31, 2009. As of
December 31, 2009, the promissory note was in default for
non-payment.
However,
on January 12, 2010, the Company and the note holder have agreed to settle the
principal balance for a cash payment of $12,500 and 156,250 shares of the
Company’s common stock.
The
Company recorded interest expense relating to the convertible promissory notes
of $12,062 and $2,616 for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Q-13
The Company amortized $28,803 and $28,803 of the debt discount for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The unamortized discount as of December 31, 2009, was $97,992.
The
following table summarizes the convertible promissory notes:
Description
|
|||||||||
Issued
convertible note, August 2006, amended November 10, 2007
|
$ | 262,356 | |||||||
Less
debt discount at December 31, 2009
|
(97,992 | ) | |||||||
Net
balance at December 31, 2009
|
$ | 164,364 | |||||||
Issued
convertible note, February 19, 2009
|
75,000 | ||||||||
Issued
convertible note, March 3, 2009
|
25,000 | ||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2009, net
|
$ | 264,364 |
Note 6 - Convertible Promissory Note - Related Party
Stockholder Notes Issued
March 27, 2007
On March
27, 2007, the Company issued convertible promissory notes to two stockholders of
the Company. The principal amount of each convertible promissory note
was $20,000 for a combined total of $40,000. The convertible
promissory notes bear interest at 4% per annum, computed on the basis of the
actual number of days elapsed and a year of 365 days, and were scheduled to
mature on March 27, 2009; however, the maturity dates were extended to July 31,
2009. The convertible notes were in default for non-payment; however
on December 3, 2009, the note holders agreed to convert the notes into shares of
the Company’s common stock at $0.0079 in accordance with the conversion option
provided for by the notes.
On
October 25, 2007, the Company issued convertible promissory notes in the amount
of $10,000 with a conversion price of $0.0795 to each of the
stockholders. The combined total for the two convertible promissory
notes was $20,000. The promissory notes bear interest at 4% per
annum, computed on the basis of the actual number of days elapsed and a year of
365 days, and mature on October 25, 2009. On December 3, 2009, the
note holders agreed to extend the maturity date until such time as the Company
has sufficient cash to repay these notes.
Stockholder Note Issued
February 4, 2009
On
February 4, 2009, the Company issued an unsecured convertible promissory note to
a related party for an aggregate principal amount of $43,000. The
convertible promissory note has a conversion price of $0.20. The
convertible promissory note was due on March 31, 2009, and was non-interest
bearing. However, the note was subsequently amended to extend the due
date to May 31, 2009, and to accrue interest from the inception of the note at a
rate of 4.0%. As of December 31, 2009, the promissory note was in
default for non-payment; however on January 5, 2010, the Company and the note
holder agreed to a settlement. The interest rate was adjusted to 15%
retroactive to the issuance date, and the principal and accrued interest for one
year would be settled for a cash payment of $25,000 and 305,625 shares of the
Company’s common stock.
The
Company recorded interest expense related to the notes of $5,929 and $608 for
the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
The
Company amortized $1,092 and $18,976 of the debt discount for the three months
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The unamortized
discount as of December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, was $0, and $1,092,
respectively.
Q-14
The
following table summarizes the stockholder convertible promissory
notes:
Description
|
|||||
Issued
convertible note, March 27, 2007
|
$ | 20,000 | |||
Issued
convertible note, March 27, 2007
|
20,000 | ||||
Issued
convertible note, October 25, 2007
|
10,000 | ||||
Issued
convertible note, October 25, 2007
|
10,000 | ||||
Issued
convertible note, February 4, 2009
|
43,000 | ||||
Balance
at December 31, 2009
|
$ | 103,000 |
Note 7 - License Agreement
On
January 12, 2009, the Company entered into a Licensing Agreement with an
unrelated party. The Licensing Agreement gives the Company the right
to manufacture, have manufactured, use, import, and offer to sell, lease,
distribute or otherwise exploit the technology rights and intellectual
rights. The License Agreement has a term of ten years. As
consideration for the License Agreement, the Company issued 57,143 shares of its
common stock and paid $1,000 in cash. The Company determined the fair
value of the License Agreement to be $7,429 based on the market value of its
common stock on the date of the agreement plus the $1,000, for a total
acquisition cost of $8,429, which is included in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet.
The
Company recorded amortization expense related to the licensing agreement of $211
and $0 for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Note
8 - Consulting Agreement
On March
31, 2009, the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement with an outside third
party. In connection with this Consulting Agreement, the Company
issued warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of its Common Stock. The
exercise price for the warrants is as follows:
Number
of
|
|||||
warrants
issued
|
Exercise
Price
|
||||
300,000
|
$0.10
per share
|
||||
500,000
|
$0.15
per share
|
||||
600,000
|
$0.20
per share
|
||||
600,000
|
$0.25
per share
|
||||
2,000,000
|
Q-15
The vesting schedule is as follows:
Number
of
|
||||||
warrants
issued
|
Exercise
Price
|
Vesting
dates
|
||||
300,000
|
$0.10
per share
|
Immediately
|
||||
500,000
|
$0.15
per share
|
Immediately
|
||||
50,000
|
$0.20
per share
|
Immediately
|
||||
550,000
|
$0.20
per share
|
At
time of extension
|
||||
600,000
|
$0.25
per share
|
March
31, 2010
|
||||
2,000,000
|
On March
31, 2009, the date of issuance, the fair value of the 850,000 vested warrants
was $88,037. The fair value was computed using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model under the following assumptions: (1) expected life of 3
years; (2) volatility of 110%; (3) risk free interest of 2.22% and (4) dividend
rate of 0%. The Company recorded $88,037 as consulting expense on the
consolidated financial statements.
At
December 31, 2009, the Company determined the fair value of the 600,000 warrants
to be $60,092. The fair value was computed using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model under the following assumptions: (1) expected life of 2.50
years; (2) volatility of 110%; (3) risk free interest of 2.22% and (4) dividend
rate of 0%. The shares vest at 12 months after the execution of the
consulting agreement; therefore, the Company will amortize the expense over the
vesting period of one year. The Company recorded $13,822 as
consulting expense for the three months ended December 31, 2009 which represents
75% of the fair value at December 31, 2009. Each quarter, the Company
will determine the fair value of the warrants and record the expense related to
the vested warrants.
The
remaining 550,000 warrants will vest at the time of extension. The
Company will compute the fair value of these warrants at that time.
Note
9 - Stockholder’s Equity
On June
30, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with non related parties to
provide the Company capital introduction services. The Company agrees
to pay 3.33 shares of common stock for every dollar raised. As of
December 31, 2009, the non-related parties had raised $57,000.
During
the three months ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued 72,727 for
consulting services. The services were valued at $10,000 based on the agreement
which was determined to be a more reliable measurement of the fair
value.
On
November 9, 2009, the Company issued 108,000 warrants valued at $13,770 for
consulting services.
During
the three months ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of
$0.001 par value common stock for $0.10 per share with 2,000,000 detachable
warrants. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.10 and expire on
April 1, 2012.
During
the three months ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued 6,966,666 shares of
$0.001 par value common stock for $0.06 per share with 6,966,666 detachable
warrants. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.20 and expire on
December 1, 2012.
Stock
Options
On
December 3, 2007, the Board of Directors adopted the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan
(the “Plan”) of CelLynx, Inc. All of the Company’s employees,
officers, directors, consultants and advisors are eligible to be granted
options, restricted stock awards, or other stock-based awards under the
Plan. The Plan is administered by the Board. The Board has
authority to grant awards and to adopt, amend and repeal such administrative
rules, guidelines and practices relating to the Plan as it shall deem
advisable. Subject to certain adjustments, awards may be made under
the Plan for up to 25,000,000 shares of common stock of the
Company. The Board shall establish the exercise price at the time
each option is granted. In July 2008, the Company amended the Plan to
increase the number of awards available under the Plan from 25,000,000 to
75,000,000.
Q-16
The following table summarizes information with respect to options outstanding under the Plan and outside the Plan.
Number
of
|
Weighted
Average
|
Aggregate
|
|||||||||
Shares
|
Exercise
Price
|
Intrinsic
Value
|
|||||||||
Outstanding
at September 30, 2008
|
53,901,863 | $ | 0.072 | ||||||||
Granted
|
9,546,081 | $ | 0.158 | ||||||||
Canceled
|
(35,734,111 | ) | $ | 0.074 | |||||||
Exercised
|
- | ||||||||||
Outstanding
at September 30, 2009
|
27,713,833 | $ | 0.102 | ||||||||
Granted
|
- | ||||||||||
Canceled
|
- | ||||||||||
Exercised
|
- | ||||||||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2009
|
27,713,833 | $ | 0.102 | ||||||||
Exercisable
at December 31, 2009
|
12,532,497 | $ | 0.078 | $ |
2,746,987
|
The
number and weighted average exercise prices of all options outstanding as of
December 31, 2009 are as follows:
Options
outstanding
|
||||||||||||||||
Weighted
|
||||||||||||||||
Weighted
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||||
Number
|
Average
|
Remaining
|
||||||||||||||
Range
of
|
Outsanding
as of
|
Exercise
|
Contractual
Life
|
|||||||||||||
Exercise
Price
|
December
31, 2009
|
Price
|
(Years)
|
|||||||||||||
$ | 0.014 - 0.100 | 18,167,752 | 0.07 | 3.43 | ||||||||||||
$ | 0.110 - 0.150 | 3,447,480 | 0.12 | 4.06 | ||||||||||||
$ | 0.160 - 0.200 | 4,356,961 | 0.17 | 4.60 | ||||||||||||
$ | 0.210 - 0.260 | 1,741,640 | 0.22 | 4.57 | ||||||||||||
27,713,833 |
Q-17
The
number and weighted average exercise prices of all options exercisable as of
December 31, 2009, are as follows:
Options
Exercisable
|
||||||||||||||||
Weighted
|
||||||||||||||||
Weighted
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||||
Number
|
Average
|
Remaining
|
||||||||||||||
Range
of
|
Outstanding
As of
|
Exercise
|
Contractual
Life
|
|||||||||||||
Exercise
Price
|
December
31, 2009
|
Price
|
(Years)
|
|||||||||||||
$ | 0.014 - 0.100 | 11,413,314 | 0.07 | 3.51 | ||||||||||||
$ | 0.110 - 0.150 | 287,594 | 0.11 | 4.15 | ||||||||||||
$ | 0.160 - 0.200 | 703,885 | 0.16 | 4.34 | ||||||||||||
$ | 0.210 - 0.260 | 127,704 | 0.26 | 4.43 | ||||||||||||
12,532,497 |
December
31, 2009
|
September
30, 2009
|
||||||||
Expected
life (years)
|
2.63
to 6.09
|
2.63
to 6.16
|
|||||||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
1.49%
to 4.57%
|
.56%
to 4.57%
|
|||||||
Expected
volatility
|
110% | 110% | |||||||
Expected
dividend yield
|
0% | 0% |
The
weighted average grant-date fair value for the options granted during the year
ended September 30, 2009, was $0.76.
The
compensation expense related to the unvested options as of December 31, 2009, is
$1,221,948, which will be recognized over the weighted average period of 2.37
years. Stock-based compensation expense to employees and non employees for the
three months ended December 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008, was $170,182 and
$122,867, respectively.
On
November 7, 2008, the Company increased the authorized number of common shares
to 400,000,000. The fair value of the stock option compensation
liability on November 7, 2008 was $2,701,572. The fair value was
computed using the Black-Scholes model under the following assumptions: (1)
expected life ranging between 2.08 and 4.2 years; (2) volatility of 100%; (3)
risk free interest ranging between 1.3% and 2.6% and (4) dividend rate of
0%. The Company reclassified this amount into additional paid-in
capital.
Warrants
On
November 9, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with Seahawk Capital
Partners, Inc. (“Seahawk”), to provide the Company capital introduction
services, as well as strategic alliance services. The Company agrees
to pay 8% in cash fees for capital introduced by Seahawk and a number of
warrants based on the cash fee amount at $0.10. As of December 31,
2009, the Company paid a cash fee of $10,800 and issued 108,000
warrants.
The
Company determined the fair value of the 108,000 warrants to be
$13,770. The fair value was computed using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model under the following assumptions: (1) expected life of 3 years; (2)
volatility of 110%; (3) risk free interest of 1.40% and (4) dividend rate of
0%. The shares vest immediately and have an exercise price of
$0.10.
During
the three months ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of
$0.001 par value common stock for $0.10 per share with 2,000,000 detachable
warrants. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.10 and expire on
April 1, 2012.
Q-18
During
the three months ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued 6,966,666 shares of
$0.001 par value common stock for $0.06 per share with 6,966,666 detachable
warrants. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.20 and expire on
December 1, 2012.
The
following table summarizes the warrant activity:
Number
of
warrants
issued
|
|||||
Outstanding,
September 30, 2008
|
10,500,000 | ||||
Granted
|
8,060,000 | ||||
Cancelled
|
(10,500,000 | ) | |||
Exercised
|
- | ||||
Outstanding,
September 30, 2009
|
8,060,000 | ||||
Granted
|
9,074,666 | ||||
Cancelled
|
- | ||||
Exercised
|
- | ||||
Outstanding,
December 31, 2009 (unaudited)
|
17,134,666 |
Note
10 - Commitments and Contingencies
Operating
Leases
On
February 21, 2008, the Company entered into a one-year lease for office space
for its El Dorado Hills, California, office, which was subsequently amended to
extend the lease term to March 31, 2010. The lease requires monthly
payments of $2,198. On August 26, 2008, the Company entered into an
eighteen-month lease for office space for its Mission Viejo, California, office
beginning on October 1, 2008. The lease requires monthly payments of
$4,664. The Mission Viejo lease term was amended and extended to
April 30, 2012 with monthly payments of $3,710 commencing on May 1, 2010,
thereafter increasing to $3,816 on May 1, 2011.
The
Company recorded rent expense of $20,586 and $20,686 for three months ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Future
minimum rent expense for the remaining years are as follow
Years
ended September 30,
|
Amount
|
||||
2010
|
$ | 42,261 | |||
2011
|
43,350 | ||||
2012
|
25,287 |
Litigation
The
Company is subject to various legal matters in the ordinary course of
business. After taking into consideration the Company’s legal
counsels’ evaluation of these matters, the Company has determined that the
resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Note
11 - Taxes
We have
provided no current income taxes due to the losses incurred from October 11,
2005 (date of inception), through December 31, 2009. Net operating
losses of approximately $4,433,771 at December 31, 2009, are available
for carryover. The net operating losses will expire from 2022
through 2024. The Company has provided a 100% valuation
allowance for the deferred tax benefit resulting from the net operating loss
carryover due to their limited operating history. In addressing the
realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is
dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in
which those temporary differences are deductible.
Q-19
A
reconciliation of the statutory Federal income tax rate and the effective income
tax rate for the three months ended December 31, 2009, and the year ended
December 31, 2008, follows:
December
31,
|
December
31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||
Statutory
federal income tax rate
|
(0.34 | ) | (0.34 | ) | |||||
State
income taxes (benefit), net of federal taxes
|
(0.06 | ) | (0.06 | ) | |||||
Equity
instruments issued for compensation/services
|
0.09 | 0.05 | |||||||
Change
in derivative liabilities
|
- | 0.08 | |||||||
Valuation
allowance
|
0.31 | 0.27 | |||||||
Effective
income tax rate
|
- | - |
Significant
components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
December
31,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2009
|
||||||||
(unaudited)
|
|||||||||
Deferred
tax assets:
|
|||||||||
Net
operating loss carryforwards
|
$ | 1,937,435 | $ | 1,694,205 | |||||
Valuation
allowance
|
(1,937,435 | ) | (1,694,205 | ) | |||||
Net
deferred tax assets
|
$ | - | $ | - |
The
Company adopted ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes,” on January 1,
2007. There were no unrecognized tax benefits as of the date of
adoption and there are no unrecognized tax benefits included in the balance
sheet at December 31, 2009, that would, if recognized, affect the effective tax
rate.
Q-20
Note
12 - Subsequent Events
The
Company has entered into agreements after December 31, 2009 on those convertible
notes that were in default to settle outstanding principal and accrued interest
balances (See Notes 5 and 6).
On
January 8, 2010, the Company issued 280,112 shares of common stock for legal
services valued at $67,227.
During
January 2010, the Company entered into subscription agreements and issued
4,250,085 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for $0.20 per share with
4,250,085 detachable warrants in the amount of $255,000. The warrants
have an exercise price of $0.06 and expire on December 1, 2012.
During
January 2010, the Company entered into subscription agreements and issued
8,633,333 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for $0.06 per share with
8,633,333 detachable warrants in the amount of $518,000. The warrants
have an exercise price of $0.20 and expire on December 31, 2012.
On
January 15, 2010, the Company entered into a one year agreement with Seahawk
Capital Partners, Inc. for consulting services. The Company, will
issue 1 million shares of Company restricted stock and 2 million warrants upon
signing of agreement. The Company agreed to issue an additional
50,000 shares of restricted Company stock per month until January 15,
2011.
The
Company has performed an evaluation of subsequent events through February 19,
2010, which is the date the consolidated financial statements were issued, and
no additional significant subsequent events warrant disclosure.
Q-21
Table of Contents | ||
Summary
information about Cellynx Group, Inc., and
this offering
|
1 | |
Risk
factors
|
5 | |
Use
of proceeds
|
11 | |
Determination
of offering price
|
11 | |
Dilution
|
11 | |
Selling
Shareholders
|
11 | |
Plan
of Distribution
|
13 | CELLYNX GROUP, INC. |
Description
of Securities
|
15 | |
Interests
of Named Experts and Counsel
|
16 | _____________ |
Information
about the Company
|
16 | 40,033,794 SHARES |
Properties
|
29 | |
Legal
proceedings
|
29 | COMMON STOCK |
Management's
discussion and analysis or plan
of operation
|
29 | |
Disagreements
with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosures
|
36 | _____________ |
Quantitative
and Qualitative disclosures about market
risk
|
36 | |
Directors,
Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
|
36 | PROSPECTUS |
Executive
Compensation
|
40 | _____________ |
Security
ownership of certain beneficial owners
and management
|
44 | |
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and
Director Independence
|
46 | March __, 2010 |
Index
to financial statements
|
47 | |
Experts
|
48 | |
Legal
Matters
|
48 | |
____________________
Dealer Prospectus Delivery
Obligation. Until [a date which is 90 days from the
effective date of this prospectus], all dealers that effect transactions
in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be
required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the
dealers' obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters
and with respect to their unsold allotments or
subscriptions.
|
PART
II. Information Not
Required in the Prospectus
Item
24. Indemnification of
Directors and Officers
Our
Bylaws authorize us to indemnify our officers and directors under certain
circumstances. We anticipate we will enter into indemnification
agreements with each of our executive officers and directors pursuant to which
we will agree to indemnify each such person for all expenses and liabilities
incurred by such person in connection with any civil or criminal action brought
against such person by reason of their being an officer or director of the
Company . In order to be entitled to such indemnification, such
person must have acted in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be
in or not opposed to our best interests and, with respect to criminal actions,
such person must have had no reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was
unlawful.
Insofar
as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may
be permitted to our directors, officers or controlling persons pursuant to the
foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of
the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore,
unenforceable.
Item
25. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution
We will
pay all expenses in connection with the registration and sale of the common
stock by the selling shareholder. The estimated expenses of issuance
and distribution are set forth below.
Registration Fees | $ | 429 | ||
Transfer Agent Fees | 2,000 | |||
Costs of Printing and Engraving | 3,000 | |||
Legal Fees | 15,000 | |||
Accounting Fees | 15,000 | |||
Total Estimated Costs of Offering | $ | 35,429 |
Item
26. Recent Sales of
Unregistered Securities
Recent Sales of Unregistered
Securities
The
following information summarizes certain information for all securities we have
sold during the past two fiscal years without registration under the Securities
Act.
During
the three months ended September 30, 2009, the Company issued 3,060,000 shares
of the Company’s common stock for proceeds of $334,500. The Company
also issued 298,181 shares for services rendered to the Company valued at
$45,599.
In
December 2009 and January 2010, the Company conducted a private placement of
units (the “Units”). Each Unit consisted of 16,667 shares of the
Company’s common stock, par value $0.9001 per share (the “Common Stock”) and a
warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase up to an additional 16,667 shares of Common
Stock, with an exercise price of $0.20 per share. The thirteen
Selling Shareholders purchased Units in the Unit Offering.
This
Prospectus, and the Registration Statement of which is a part, covers the resale
by the selling shareholders of the shares of Common Stock, as well as shares
underlying the Warrants, purchased in the Unit Offering.
The Unit
Offering was made without registration under the 1933 Act in reliance on Section
4(2) of the 1933 Act and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder.
II-1
On
January 8, 2010, the Company issued 280,112 shares of common stock for legal
services valued at $67,227.
On
January 15, 2010, the Company entered into a one year agreement with Seahawk
Capital Partners, Inc. for consulting services. The Company, will
issue 1 million shares of Company restricted stock and 2 million warrants upon
signing of agreement. The Company agreed to issue an additional
50,000 shares of restricted Company stock per month until January 15,
2011.
Each of
the issuances listed above were made without registration under the 1933 Act in
reliance on Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder.
Item
27. Exhibits
Copies of
the following documents are filed with this registration statement as
exhibits:
INDEX
TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
|
2.1
|
Share
Exchange Agreement by and among the Company, CelLynx-California and the
CelLynx Owners dated January 3, 2008 (1)
|
|
2.2
|
Amendment
Agreement to Share Exchange Agreement between the Company and
CelLynx-California dated May 20, 2008 (2)
|
|
2.3
|
Waiver
of Conditions Precedent (7)
|
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation of CelLynx Group, Inc. (3)
|
|
3.2
|
Articles
of Merger of CelLynx Group, Inc. (4)
|
|
3.3
|
Bylaws
of CelLynx Group, Inc. (4)
|
|
3.4
|
Certificate
of Designation of CelLynx Group, Inc. (5)
|
|
3.5
|
Articles
of Merger of CelLynx Group, Inc. (8)
|
|
3.6
|
Certificate
of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of CelLynx Group, Inc.
(9)
|
|
5
|
Opinion
of Durham Jones & Pinegar, P.C. +
|
|
10.1
|
Form
of Subscription Agreement dated July 23, 2008 (6)
|
|
10.2
|
Form
of Warrant dated July 23, 2008 (6)
|
II-2
10.3
|
Master
Global Marketing and Distribution Agreement between CelLynx and Dollardex
Group Corp. dated July 22, 2008 (7)
|
|
10.4
|
Palomar
Ventures III, LP Amended and Restated Subordinated Convertible Promissory
Note dated November 10, 2007 (7)
|
|
10.5
|
Lease
Agreement between CelLynx-California and CSS Properties, LLC dated
February 21, 2008 (7)
|
|
10.6
|
CelLynx-California
2007 Stock Incentive Plan (7)
|
|
10.7
|
Amendment
No. 1 to CelLynx-California 2007 Stock Incentive Plan
(7)
|
|
10.8
|
Form
of Lock-Up Agreement dated July 22, 2008 (7)
|
|
10.9
|
Norman
W. Collins Offer Letter dated July 15, 2008 (7)
|
|
10.10
|
Kevin
Pickard Consulting Agreement dated July 22, 2008 (7)
|
|
10.11
|
Convertible
Promissory Note between CelLynx-California and Daniel Ash dated March 27,
2007 (7)
|
|
10.12
|
Convertible
Promissory Note between CelLynx-California and Tareq Risheq dated March
27, 2007 (7)
|
|
10.13
|
Convertible
Promissory Note between CelLynx-California and Daniel Ash dated October
25, 2007 (7)
|
|
10.14
|
Convertible
Promissory Note between CelLynx-California and Tareq Risheq dated October
25, 2007 (7)
|
|
10.15
|
Incentive
Stock Option Agreement between CelLynx-California and Daniel Ash dated
October 1, 2007 (7)
|
|
10.16
|
Incentive
Stock Option Agreement between CelLynx-California and Tareq Risheq dated
October 1, 2007 (7)
|
|
10.17
|
Incentive
Stock Option Agreement between CelLynx-California and Robert Legendre
dated October 1, 2007 (7)
|
|
10.18
|
Non-Qualified
Stock Option Agreement between CelLynx-California and Daniel Ash dated
October 1, 2007 (7)
|
II-3
10.19
|
Non-Qualified
Option Agreement between CelLynx-California and Tareq Risheq dated October
1, 2007 (7)
|
|
10.20
|
Non-Qualified
Stock Option Agreement between CelLynx-California and Robert Legendre
dated October 1, 2007 (7)
|
|
10.21
|
Non-Qualified
Stock Option Agreement between CelLynx-California and Daniel Ash dated
April 21, 2008 (7)
|
|
10.22
|
Non-Qualified
Option Agreement between CelLynx-California and Tareq Risheq dated April
21, 2008 (7)
|
|
10.23
|
Non-Qualified
Stock Option Agreement between CelLynx-California and Daniel Ash dated May
20, 2008 (7)
|
|
10.24
|
Non-Qualified
Option Agreement between CelLynx-California and Tareq Risheq dated May 20,
2008 (7)
|
|
10.25
|
Non-Qualified
Option Agreement between CelLynx-California and Norman Collins dated July
20, 2008 (7)
|
|
10.26
|
Stock
Purchase Agreement between CelLynx-California and Norman Collins dated
February 12, 2008 (7)
|
|
10.27
|
Lease
Agreement between CelLynx and Dolphinshire, L.P. dated August 26, 2008
(11)
|
|
10.28
|
Securities
Issuance Agreement executed on May 4, 2009 by and among the Registrant,
Dollardex Group Corp. and the other parties listed therein
(10)
|
|
16
|
Letter
from Moore Stephens dated January 7, 2010 (12)
|
|
17.1
|
Letter
of Resignation from John P. Thornton to the Board of Directors
(7)
|
|
21.1
|
List
of Subsidiaries (7)
|
|
23
|
Consent
of Frazer Frost, LLP*
|
|
24
|
Power
of Attorney (signature page)
|
|
__________________
*
Filed Herewith.
+ To be filed by amendment.
|
II-4
(1)
|
Filed
on January 9, 2008 as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
(2)
|
Filed
on May 27, 2008 as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
(3)
|
Filed
as an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form 10SB originally filed
on August 26, 1999, as amended, an incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(4)
|
Filed
as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal period
ended September 30, 2003, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(5)
|
Filed
on July 15, 2008 as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
(6)
|
Filed
on July 23, 2008 as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
(7)
|
Filed
on July 30, 2008 as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
(8)
|
Filed
on August 8, 2008 as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
(9)
|
Filed
on November 21, 2008 as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
(10)
|
Filed
on May 8, 2009, as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
(11)
|
Filed
on October 14, 2008, as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
(12)
|
Filed
on January 7, 2010, as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
Item
28. Undertakings
Insofar
as indemnification for liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933 may be
permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons pursuant to the
provisions described above, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the
opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is,
therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for
indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by us of
expenses incurred or paid by our director, officer or controlling person in the
successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered, we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel the matter has been
settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction
the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as
expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.
We hereby
undertake:
(1) To
file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a
post-effective amendment to this registration statement:
(i) To
include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of
1933;
II-5
(ii) To specify in
the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the
registration statement (or most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which,
individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the
information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the
total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was
registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum
offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) (Section 230.4242(b)
of Regulation S-B) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price
represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set
forth in the "Calculation of Registration Fee" table in the effective
registration statement; and
(iii) To include
any additional or changed material information with respect to the plan of
distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any
material change to such information in the registration statement.
(2) That, for the
purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such
post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities
at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering
thereof.
(3) To remove
from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities
being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the
offering.
II-6
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, we
certify that we have reasonable grounds to believe that we meet all of the
requirements of filing on Form S-1 and authorized this registration statement to
be signed on our behalf by the undersigned, on March 9, 2010.
CELLYNX
GROUP, INC.
|
||
Dated:
March 9, 2010
|
By:
|
/s/
Daniel R. Ash
Daniel
R. Ash
President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating
Officer
|
POWER OF
ATTORNEY
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement
has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the
dates indicated. Each person whose signature appears below hereby authorizes
Daniel R. Ash, with full power of substitution, to execute in the name and on
behalf of such person any amendment (including any post-effective amendment) to
this Registration Statement (or any other registration statement for the same
offering that is to be effective upon filing pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the
Securities Act) and to file the same, with exhibits thereto, and other documents
in connection therewith, making such changes in this Registration Statement as
the person(s) so acting deems appropriate, and appoints each of such persons,
each with full power of substitution, attorney-in-fact to sign any amendment
(including any post-effective amendment) to this Registration Statement (or any
other registration statement for the same offering that is to be effective upon
filing pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act) and to file the same,
with exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therein.
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has
been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name
|
Position
|
Date
|
||
/s/
Daniel R. Ash
|
Director
and Principal Executive Officer
|
March
9, 2010
|
||
Daniel R. Ash | ||||
/s/
Kevin Pickard
|
Consultant
providing services commonly
|
March
9, 2010
|
||
Kevin
Pickard
|
provided
by a Chief Financial Officer,
Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer
|
|||
/s/
Tareq Risheq
|
Director
|
March
9, 2010
|
||
Tareq Risheq | ||||
/s/
Donald A Wright
|
Chairman
of the Board
|
March
9, 2010
|
||
Donald A Wright | ||||
/s/
Norman W. Collins
|
Director
|
March
9, 2010
|
||
Norman W. Collins | ||||
/s/
Dwayne Yaretz
|
Director
|
March
9, 2010
|
||
Dwayne Yaretz |
II-7