Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - World Energy Solutions, Inc. | c97117exv32w1.htm |
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - World Energy Solutions, Inc. | c97117exv32w2.htm |
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - World Energy Solutions, Inc. | c97117exv31w2.htm |
EX-23.1 - EXHIBIT 23.1 - World Energy Solutions, Inc. | c97117exv23w1.htm |
EX-21.1 - EXHIBIT 21.1 - World Energy Solutions, Inc. | c97117exv21w1.htm |
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - World Energy Solutions, Inc. | c97117exv31w1.htm |
EX-10.21 - EXHIBIT 10.21 - World Energy Solutions, Inc. | c97117exv10w21.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
þ | Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
or
o | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-34289
World Energy Solutions, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 04-3474959 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
446 Main Street
Worcester, Massachusetts 01608
Worcester, Massachusetts 01608
(Address of principal executive offices)
(508) 459-8100
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
Name of each exchange on which registered: | |
Common Stock, $.001 par value
|
NASDAQ Capital Market | |
Toronto Stock Exchange |
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
None
Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company þ |
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant based on
the last sale price of such stock as reported by the NASDAQ Capital Market on June 30, 2009 (the
last business day of the Registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was
$25,739,537.
As of February 19, 2010, the registrant had 9,076,970 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to be held on May 20, 2010, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.
World Energy Solutions, Inc.
Form 10-K
For the Year Ended December 31, 2009
Form 10-K
For the Year Ended December 31, 2009
Table of Contents
1 | ||||||||
11 | ||||||||
18 | ||||||||
18 | ||||||||
18 | ||||||||
18 | ||||||||
19 | ||||||||
20 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
33 | ||||||||
34 | ||||||||
34 | ||||||||
34 | ||||||||
34 | ||||||||
35 | ||||||||
35 | ||||||||
35 | ||||||||
35 | ||||||||
35 | ||||||||
35 | ||||||||
36 | ||||||||
37 | ||||||||
59 | ||||||||
Exhibit 10.21 | ||||||||
Exhibit 21.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 23.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.2 |
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, which statements involve risks and
uncertainties. These statements relate to our future plans, objectives, expectations and
intentions. These statements may be identified by the use of words such as may, could, would,
should, will, expects, anticipates, intends, plans, believes, estimates and similar
expressions. Our actual results and timing of certain events could differ materially from those
discussed in these statements. Factors that could contribute to these differences include but are
not limited to, those discussed under Risk Factors, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and elsewhere in this Report. The cautionary
statements made in this Report should be read as being applicable to all forward-looking statements
wherever they appear in this Report.
Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1. Business
Overview
World Energy Solutions, Inc. (World Energy or the Company) is an energy and environmental
commodities brokerage company that has developed two online auction platforms, the World Energy
Exchange and the World Green Exchange. On the World Energy Exchange, retail energy consumers
(commercial, industrial and government) and wholesale energy participants (utilities, electricity
retailers and intermediaries) in the United States (listers) are able to negotiate for the
purchase or sale of electricity and other energy resources from competing energy suppliers
(bidders) which have agreed to participate on the Companys auction platform. The World Energy
Exchange is supplemented with information about market rules, pricing trends, energy consumer usage
and load profiles. Our procurement staff uses this auction platform to conduct auctions, analyze
results, guide energy consumers through contracting, and track their contracts, sites, accounts and
usage history. Although our primary source of revenue is from brokering electricity and natural
gas, we adapted our World Energy Exchange auction platform to accommodate the brokering of green
power in 2003 (i.e., electricity generated by renewable resources), wholesale electricity in 2004
and certain other energy-related products in 2005. In 2007, we created the World Green Exchange
based on our World Energy Exchange technology and business process. On the World Green Exchange,
bidders and listers negotiate for the purchase or sale of environmental commodities such as
Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs), Verified Emissions Reductions (VERs), Certified Emissions
Reductions (CERs) and Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) allowances.
While the retail product line represents over 80% of our consolidated revenue, we have
continued to develop and build solutions to address the wholesale and environmental commodities
markets. We support the wholesale product line by utilizing the same technology and process that
we developed for the retail product line. Wholesale has evolved into a significant revenue
contributor for us with approximately 13% and 10% of our consolidated revenue in 2009 and 2008,
respectively. We developed the World Green Exchange to support the environmental commodity product
line. The World Green Exchange used our existing post and respond process and technology as the
basis for building out the World Green Exchange. We have had numerous successful auctions within
the environmental commodities market and have conducted auctions for every major type of
environmental commodity including U.S. VERs, Canadian and U.S. RECs and CERs for a European
lister. In August 2008, we were awarded a two-year contract with RGGI. RGGI, a consortium of 10
Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states, is the first mandatory market-based effort in the United States
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. RGGI selected our World Green Exchange to sell allowances for
the emitting of carbon dioxide emissions from the power sector. In accordance with this contract
we will conduct quarterly auctions for RGGI over the two-year period with an option to extend for
an additional two year period. We successfully completed six quarterly auctions for RGGI through
December 31, 2009.
We continue to apply process and technology to opaque and inefficient markets in the energy
and energy related markets. Subsequent to year end we launched the World DR Exchange to create an
efficient, transparent and liquid marketplace that benefits customers and suppliers alike in the
demand response (DR) industry. The World DR Exchange creates the industrys first online
marketplace for demand response, enabling customers to source DR more efficiently and effectively
bringing together curtailment service providers and energy consumers in highly-structured auction
events designed to yield price transparency, heighten competition, and maximize the enery
consumers share of demand response revenues.
On November 16, 2006, we completed our initial public offering of common stock for the sale of
2,300,000 shares of common stock (as adjusted for the one-for-ten reverse stock split described
below) resulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $17.5 million (net of offering
costs of approximately $3.6 million).
On June 1, 2007, we acquired substantially all of the assets of EG Partners, LLC, formerly
known as EnergyGateway LLC (EnergyGateway), for $4,951,758 in cash and 537,500 of common shares
of World Energy (as adjusted for the one-for-ten reverse stock split described below) plus the
assumption of certain liabilities. The EnergyGateway operations are included in these financial
statements from June 1, 2007.
On March 27, 2009, we filed a previously approved Certificate of Amendment to the Companys
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Delaware to (i)
effect a reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock at a ratio of one-for-ten; and (ii)
decrease the number of authorized shares of our common stock from 150,000,000 to 15,000,000. As a
result of the reverse stock split, the issued and outstanding shares of common stock were reduced
on a basis of one share for every ten shares outstanding. All of our stock related information
including issued and outstanding common stock, stock options and warrants to purchase common stock,
restricted stock and loss per share for all periods presented have been restated to reflect the
reverse stock split.
On October 30, 2009, we entered into an agreement with Bond Capital, Ltd. (Bond), a
strategic partner of ours, for the purchase of up to $2.5 million of our common stock. Pursuant to
the agreement, a purchasing entity, an affiliate of Bond, acquired $1.0 million of our common stock
at $2.97 per share on November 6, 2009. We agreed to offer an additional $1.5 million in common
stock on the same terms to Bond or its designee, with the price to be determined at the time of
investment, through
January 15, 2010. Subsequent to December 31, 2009, affiliates of Bond purchased an additional
$400,000 of our common stock at an average price of $2.63 per share bringing the net amount raised
under the financing agreement to $1.3 million.
1
Table of Contents
The Retail Energy Industry
Retail Electricity Deregulation
The electricity industry in the United States is governed by both federal and state laws and
regulations, with the federal government having jurisdiction over the sale and transmission of
electricity at the wholesale level in interstate commerce, and the states having jurisdiction over
the sale and distribution of electricity at the retail level.
The federal government regulates the electricity wholesale and transmission business through
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or FERC, which draws its jurisdiction from the Federal
Power Act, and from other legislation such as the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978,
the Energy Policy Act of 1992, and the Energy Policy Act of 2005, or EPA 2005. FERC has
comprehensive and plenary jurisdiction over the rates and terms for sales of power at wholesale,
and over the organization, governance and financing of the companies engaged in such sales. States
regulate the sale of electricity at the retail level within their respective jurisdictions, in
accordance with individual state laws which can vary widely in material respects. Restructuring of
the retail electricity industry in the United States began in the mid-1990s, when certain state
legislatures restructured their electricity markets to create competitive markets that enable
energy consumers to purchase electricity from competitive energy suppliers.
Prior to the restructuring of the retail electricity industry, the electricity market
structure in the United States consisted of vertically integrated utilities which had a near
monopoly over the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity to retail energy
consumers. In states that have embraced electricity restructuring, the generation component (i.e.,
the source of the electricity) has become more competitive while the energy delivery functions of
transmission and distribution remain as monopoly services provided by the incumbent local utility
and subject to comprehensive rate regulation. In other words, in these states, certain retail
energy consumers (specifically, those served by investor-owned utilities and not by municipal power
companies or rural power cooperatives) can choose their electricity supplier but must still rely
upon their local utility to deliver that electricity to their home or place of business.
The structure and, ultimately, the success level of industry restructuring has been determined
on a state by state basis. There have been three general models for electricity industry
restructuring: (i) delayed competition, (ii) phased-in competition, and (iii) full competition. The
delayed competition model consists of the state passing legislation authorizing competitive retail
electricity markets (i.e., customer choice of electric energy supplier), however, no action is
taken by the state regulatory authority charged with utility industry oversight within such state
to change the incumbent utility rates for electric energy to encourage competition. The phased-in
competition model consists of the state passing legislation authorizing competitive retail
electricity markets together with a gradual change of the incumbent utilitys retail electric rates
to encourage the competitive supply of electricity over time. The full competition model consists
of the state passing legislation authorizing competitive retail electricity markets together with
an immediate change to the incumbent local utilities retail electric rates that results in the
whole commercial, industrial and government, or CIG, electricity market in such state being
competitive immediately.
Energy consumers who choose to switch electricity suppliers can either do it themselves by
contacting competitive energy suppliers directly, or indirectly, by engaging aggregators, brokers
or consultants, collectively referred to as ABCs, to assist them with their electricity
procurement.
Competitive Energy Suppliers: These entities take title to power and resell it directly to
energy consumers. These are typically well-funded entities, which service both energy consumers
directly and also work with ABCs, to contract with energy consumers. Presently, we estimate there
are over 40 competitive suppliers, several of which operate on a national level and are registered
in nearly all of the 16 states and the District of Columbia that permit CIG energy consumers to
choose their electricity supplier and have deregulated pricing to create competitive markets. Of
the 16 deregulated states, 12 have viable competitive markets.
Aggregators, Brokers and Consultants: ABCs facilitate transactions by having competitive
energy suppliers compete against each other in an effort to get their energy customers the lowest
price. This group generally uses manual request for proposal, or RFP, processes that are labor
intensive, relying on phone, fax and email solicitations. We believe that the online RFP process is
superior to the traditional paper-based RFP process as it involves a larger number of energy
suppliers, can accommodate a larger number of bids within a shorter time span, and allows for a
larger amount of contract variations including various year terms, territories and energy usage
patterns.
Online Brokers: Online brokers are a subset of the ABCs. These entities use online platforms
to run electronic RFP processes in an effort to secure the lowest prices for their energy customers
by having competitors bid against one another. We believe that we are among the pioneering
companies brokering electricity online and we are not aware of any competitor that has brokered
more electricity online than we have.
2
Table of Contents
Retail Natural Gas
The natural gas industry in the United States is governed by both federal and state laws and
regulations, with the federal government having jurisdiction over the transmission of natural gas
in interstate commerce, and the states having jurisdiction over the sale and distribution at the
retail level.
The federal government regulates the natural gas transmission business through FERC which
draws its jurisdiction from the Natural Gas Act, and from other legislation such as the EPA 2005.
FERC has comprehensive and plenary jurisdiction over the rates and terms for transmission of gas in
interstate commerce, and over the organization, governance and financing of the companies engaged
in such transmission. States regulate the distribution and sale of gas at the retail level within
their respective jurisdictions, in accordance with individual state laws which can vary widely in
material respects.
The natural gas market in the United States is deregulated in most states and offers retail
energy consumers access to their choice of natural gas commodity supplier.
Following a period of heavy regulation, the gas industry was deregulated in three phases as a
result of legislation enacted in 1978 followed by multiple orders of FERC. The expected result of
this deregulation was to stimulate competition in the natural gas industry down the pipeline to the
distribution level.
At the retail level, reforms and restructuring have taken place on a state by state basis,
with varying nuances to the restructuring in different states. For example, state commissions have
allowed local distribution companies to offer unbundled transportation service to large customers;
occasionally to provide flexible pricing in competitive markets; and to engage in other competitive
activities.
Today, we estimate that utilities in over 40 states permit retail natural gas consumers to
choose their natural gas commodity suppliers. In most instances, the incumbent local distribution
utility still delivers the commodity to the consumers premises, even if a different supplier is
selected to provide the commodity. The level of competitive choice available to retail CIG energy
consumers has increased, with a wide range of products and a significant number of suppliers
participating in both retail and wholesale transactions.
Wholesale Energy
The wholesale electricity market is the competitive market that connects generators (sellers)
with utilities, electricity retailers and intermediaries (buyers) who purchase electricity to
re-sell on the retail market. We estimate that total wholesale purchases of electric power in 2009
were 4.6 billion MWh. Natural gas is an important input fuel for
generators, and U.S. consumption of natural gas in 2009 exceeded 22 trillion cubic feet.
The U.S. wholesale electricity market emerged in the late 1970s when independent power
producers, or IPPs, and other non-utilities entered the electricity generation market, although the
market was restricted until the early 1990s when competitive constraints were removed. These new
generation entities began to compete directly with traditional utilities and offered customers more
than one choice to obtain electricity. Today, participants in the wholesale market include IPPs,
traditional utilities, and intermediary power marketers. In addition, banks, traders, and brokers
participate in the wholesale market.
IPPs and traditional utilities comprise the generation portion of the wholesale market. Many
employ internal sales forces to assist in the sale and distribution of their power, enabling them
to participate as both buyers and sellers within the wholesale market. However, a growing number of
IPPs and utilities have found it easier and more cost effective to sell their generation through
power marketing services, which has contributed to the power marketers increased role within the
market. Power marketers utilize several different platforms to purchase power from generators for
distribution, which include paper RFPs, phone brokerage, electronic exchanges and auctions.
Our customers in the wholesale market can be either buyers or sellers and can include
utilities and municipal utilities that buy power to fill in gaps in their portfolios or natural gas
to consume in their generation facilities, and retail marketers who buy natural gas and power to
resell to retail customers. If the customer is a buyer, we will run a reverse (descending price)
auction to secure a lower price. If the customer is a seller, we will run a forward (ascending
price) auction to secure a higher price.
Environmental Commodities
Concerns about global warming have spawned a number of initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions. The most widely adopted of these initiatives is the Kyoto Protocol pursuant to which
many countries in Europe, Asia and elsewhere have created carbon cap and trade systems. In carbon
cap and trade programs, carbon dioxide emission caps are established and producers of these
emissions can buy or sell credits in order to meet their required allocations. While the United
States has not ratified the Kyoto Protocol at a federal level, there are a number of initiatives in
the U.S. at the regional, state and local levels aimed at limiting greenhouse gas emissions,
including RGGI, the Western Climate Initiative and the Midwestern Greenhouse Gas Reduction Accord,
initiatives adopted by over 25 states and the District of Columbia regarding the minimum
requirements
mandated to utilities to derive power from renewable sources.
3
Table of Contents
In August 2008, we were awarded a two-year contract with RGGI, which is the first mandatory,
market based effort in the United States to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. RGGI selected our
World Green Exchange to sell allowances for the emitting of carbon dioxide emissions from the power
sector. In accordance with this contract the Company will conduct quarterly auctions for RGGI over
the two-year period with an option to extend for an additional two year period. We successfully
completed six quarterly auctions for RGGI through December 31, 2009.
Additionally, carbon emissions reduction initiatives and mandates are spurring investments in
renewable energy, carbon efficiency and recovery processes to create credits that can be traded to
countries or companies seeking to meet mandated carbon emission limits. Thus far, these credits are
being traded privately or via exchanges (such as the European Climate Exchange, Evomarkets, and the
Chicago Climate Exchange) that have been formed to take advantage of these opportunities, although
we believe that a structured auction event may be a more efficient mechanism for transacting these
credits.
Our customers in the exchange of environmental commodities can be either buyers or sellers and
include U.S. CIG customers seeking to buy renewable energy to voluntarily green their energy
portfolio, utilities seeking to meet mandated renewable portfolio standards, independent power
producers looking to sell renewable energy, project developers interested in selling carbon
offsets, entities that must meet compliance requirements and need to purchase carbon offsets, and
environmental commodity brokers. If the customer is a buyer, we will run a reverse (descending
price) auction to secure a lower price. If the customer is a seller, we will run a forward
(ascending price) auction to secure a higher price.
Company Strategy and Operations
Overview
We are an energy and environmental commodities brokerage company that has developed online
auction platforms, the World Energy Exchange and the World Green Exchange. On the World Energy
Exchange energy consumers in the U.S. are able to negotiate for the purchase or sale of electricity
and other energy resources from competing energy suppliers which have agreed to participate on our
auction platform in a given auction. On the World Green Exchange, buyers and sellers negotiate for
the purchase or sale of environmental commodities such as Renewable Energy Certificates, Verified
Emissions Reductions and Certified Emissions Reductions.
We bring suppliers and consumers together in our virtual marketplaces, often with the
assistance of our channel partners, who identify and work with customers to consummate
transactions. Our exchanges are comprised of a series of software modules that automate our
comprehensive procurement process including:
| energy and environmental commodities sourcing management a database of suppliers and
contacts; |
||
| lead management a module to track prospective customers through the sales process; |
||
| deal and task management a module to list, assign and track steps to complete a
procurement successfully; |
||
| market intelligence databases of information related to market rules and pricing
trends for markets; |
||
| request for proposal, or RFP, development a module to create RFPs with a variety of
terms and parameters; |
||
| conducting auctions underlying software to manage the bidding and timing of an auction
and display the results; |
||
| portfolio management a database of contracts, sites, accounts and usage; |
||
| commission reporting a system to display forecasted and actual commissions due to
channel partners; and |
||
| receivables management a system to upload data received from suppliers and track
payment receipt. |
Our technology-based solution is attractive to channel partners as it provides them with a
business automation platform to enhance their growth, profitability and customer satisfaction.
Channel partners are important to our business because these entities offer our auction platforms
to enhance their service offerings to their customers. By accessing our market intelligence and
automated auction platform, channel partners significantly contribute to our transaction volume,
and in return we pay them a fixed percentage of the revenue we receive from winning bidders (i.e.,
energy suppliers and other buyers). This third party commission structure is negotiated in advance
within the channel partner agreement based on a number of factors, including expected volume,
effort required in the auction process and competitive factors.
4
Table of Contents
As a requirement to bid in an auction (which is described in greater detail below), bidders
must agree to an online agreement to pay our fee if they execute a contract as a result of the
auction. Following an auction event, our employees continue to work with
the energy consumer and other listers or collectively, the customer, and bidder through the
contract negotiation process and, accordingly, we are aware of whether a contract between the
customer and bidder is consummated. If a contract is entered into between a customer and bidder
using our auction platforms, we are compensated based upon a fixed fee, or commission, that is
built into the price of the commodity. This approach is attractive to both the customer and bidder
as there is no fee charged to either party if the brokering process does not result in a contract.
Our fees are based on the total amount of the commodity transacted between the customer and bidder
multiplied by our contractual commission rate. We have master agreements with our bidders, whereby
bidders are allowed to bid on customer requirements in exchange for agreeing to pay the fee that we
have negotiated with the customer. In order to participate in any specific auction bidders are
required to acknowledge and agree to our fee on our online platform prior to participating in any
specific auction.
Retail Electricity Transactions
For retail electricity transactions, monthly revenue is based on actual usage data obtained
from the energy supplier for a given month or, to the extent actual usage data is not available,
based on the estimated amount of electricity delivered to the energy consumer for that month. While
the number of contracts closed via the World Energy Exchange in any given period can fluctuate
widely due to a number of factors, this revenue recognition method provides for a relatively
predictable revenue stream, as revenue is based on energy consumers actual historical energy usage
profile. However, monthly revenue can still vary from our expectations because usage is affected by
a number of variables which cannot always be accurately predicted, such as the weather and the
general business conditions affecting our energy consumers.
Contracts between energy consumers and energy suppliers are signed for a variety of term
lengths, with a one-year contract term being typical for commercial and industrial energy
consumers, and government contracts typically having two to three year, and occasionally five-year
terms. The chart below displays our annualized backlog from year-end 2005 through 2009. Annualized
backlog represents the revenue that we would derive within the twelve months following the date on
which the backlog is calculated from contracts between energy consumers and energy suppliers that
are in force on such date, assuming such energy consumers use energy at their historical usage
levels. For any particular contract, annualized backlog is calculated by multiplying the energy
consumers historical usage by our fixed contractual commission rate. This metric is not intended
as an estimate of overall future revenues, since it does not purport to include revenues that may
be earned during the relevant 12-month backlog period from new contracts or renewals of contracts
that expire during such period. In addition, annualized backlog does not represent guaranteed
future revenues, and to the extent actual usage under a particular contract varies from historical
usage, our revenues under such contract will differ from the amount included in annualized backlog.
In addition to retail electricity contracts, we have ongoing contractual arrangements with
retail natural gas customers under which we deliver certain energy management auction
administration services for which we receive a monthly fee. Annualized backlog as at December 31,
2009 includes monthly management fees related to natural gas contracts of $1.0 million that have
expected revenue associated with them from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010. These
contracts may expire during the period and therefore the annualized backlog does not include any
revenue from expected contract renewals. Also included in our annualized backlog is revenue
expected to be derived in the following 12 months from administering quarterly auctions for RGGI.
Annualized Backlog
(in millions)
(in millions)
5
Table of Contents
Because the calculation of backlog is a calculation of a contracted commission rate multiplied
by a historical energy usage figure and our management contracts are cancelable by our natural gas
customers, our annualized backlog may not necessarily be indicative of future results. Annualized
backlog should not be viewed in isolation or as a substitute for our historical revenues presented
in the financial statements included in this Form 10-K. Events that may cause future revenues from
contracts in force to differ materially from our annualized backlog include the events that may
affect energy usage, such as overall business activity levels, changes in energy consumers
businesses, weather patterns and other factors described under Risk Factors.
Retail Natural Gas Transactions
There are two primary fee components to our retail natural gas services transaction fees and
management fees. Transaction fees are billed to and paid by the energy supplier awarded business on
the platform. Transaction fees for natural gas and electricity awards are established prior to
award and are the same for each supplier. For the majority of our natural gas transactions, we bill
the supplier upon the conclusion of the transaction based on the estimated energy volume transacted
for the entire award term multiplied by the transaction fee. Management fees are paid by our energy
consumers and are generally billed on a monthly basis for services rendered based on terms and
conditions included in contractual arrangements. While substantially all of our retail natural gas
transactions are accounted for in accordance with this policy, a certain percentage is accounted
for as the natural gas is consumed by the customer.
Wholesale Transactions
Wholesale transaction fees are invoiced upon the conclusion of the auction based on a fixed
fee. These revenues are not tied to future energy usage and are recognized upon the completion of
the online auction. For reverse auctions where our customers bid for a consumers business, the
fees are paid by the bidder. For forward auctions where a lister is selling energy, the fees are
typically paid by the lister. While substantially all wholesale transactions are accounted for in
this fashion, a small percentage of our wholesale revenue is accounted for as electricity or gas is
delivered.
Environmental Commodity Transactions
Environmental commodity transaction fees are accounted for utilizing two primary methods. For
regulated allowance programs like RGGI, fees are paid by the lister and are recognized as revenue
quarterly as auctions are completed and approved. For all other environmental commodity
transactions both the lister and the bidder pay a transaction fee and revenue is recognized upon
the consummation of the underlying transaction as credits are delivered by the lister and payment
is made by the bidder.
The Brokerage Process
Our brokerage process is supported by a variety of software modules designed with the goal to
find the best possible price while providing step-by-step process management and detailed
documentation prior to, during and following the auction. Our process includes data collection and
analysis, establishing the benchmark price, conducting multiple auction events to enable testing of
various term and price combinations and assisting in contract completion. We create an audit trail
of all the steps taken in a given transaction. Specific web pages track all information provided to
energy suppliers including energy supplier calls, supplier invitations, usage profiles and desired
contract parameters.
At the commencement of the process, non-government energy consumers will enter into a
procurement services agreement with us pursuant to which we are appointed as the brokerage service
provider to solicit and obtain bids for the supply of energy or environmental commodities and to
assist in the procurement of these commodities. Government energy consumers will send out a
solicitation at the commencement of the brokerage process which sets out the contract terms. Only
bidders that are qualified under the solicitation may participate in the auction. Bidders who wish
to bid on the provision of energy or environmental commodities to such customers must partake in
our brokerage process and cannot contract with customers outside of our brokerage process.
For retail energy, the procurement services agreement authorizes us to retrieve the energy
consumers energy usage history from the utility serving its accounts. We utilize the usage history
to identify and analyze the energy consumers energy needs and to run a rate and tariff model which
calculates the utility rate for that energy consumers facilities. This price is used as a
benchmark price to beat for the auction event. For other customers or commodities, the benchmark
price may be negotiated or calculated in another manner.
Prior to conducting the auction, the auction parameters, including target price, supplier
preferences, contract terms, payment terms and product mix, as applicable, are discussed with the
customer and agreed upon. Approximately two to five days prior to the auction, we will post RFPs
with these auction parameters on our World Energy Exchange or World Green Exchange and alert the
potential bidders. Additionally, bidders are provided with information about the customer,
historical energy usage information relating to the energy consumers facilities (if retail
customers), and the desired contract parameters, several days in advance of the auction as part of
the RFP. This advanced notice gives the bidders the opportunity to analyze the value of a potential
deal and the creditworthiness of the customer. We believe that, using this information along with
the auction parameters described in the RFP, the bidders develop a bidding strategy for the
auction.
6
Table of Contents
The auction is run on the World Energy Exchange or the World Green Exchange, depending on the
commodity auctioned. The auction creates a competitive bidding environment that is designed to
cause bidders to deliver better prices in response to other competitive bids. Specifically, bidders
enter an auction by submitting an opening bid at or better than the suggested opening bid posted on
the RFP. After they enter the auction and assess the bidding activity, bidders may begin testing
the competition by submitting a bid better than the then-leading bid. They do this presumably to
test their pricing and to gauge the relative level of competition for the deal. There is typically
a modest level of bidding and counter-bidding activity among bidders until the final 30 seconds of
the auction when bidding activity tends to increase. In the final seconds, all bidders see the
then-leading bid and must make a judgment as to how aggressively to submit their last bid in order
to win the deal. At this point in the auction, bidders make their final bid without knowledge of
what any other bidders are bidding. We call this a final blind bid.
Typically, a number of auctions tailored to the customers specific needs will be held. Our
exchanges provide rapid results and can accommodate a multitude of permutations for offers,
including various year terms, quantities, load factors and green power requirements. For commercial
and industrial customers or project owners, we typically run two to six auction events per
procurement and for large government aggregations that generally are more complex, we typically run
20 to 40 auction events. Each auction event usually lasts 15 minutes or less. Included as part of
any auction transaction are date and time stamping of bids, comparison of each bid with benchmark
prices, as well as automated stop times, which ensure the integrity of auction events. The
exchanges are also periodically synchronized to the atomic clock which is intended to ensure that
auction start and stop times are precise.
Following an auction, the auction results are analyzed and if the auction has been successful,
we assist the customer with the contracting process with the winning bidder which is typically
finalized within one hour of the closing of the last auction event. In the case of a commercial
energy consumer, we facilitate any remaining discussion between the leading energy supplier and the
energy consumer relating to the energy suppliers contract terms that were not addressed in
establishing the auction parameters. In the case of government energy consumers, the energy
suppliers have seen and, in general, have agreed to the form of supply contract being required by
the government energy consumer. Accordingly, the time period between the end of the auction and the
execution of a contract is usually shorter than in the case of non-government energy consumers. Not
all auctions result in awarded contracts.
For retail energy transactions, the incumbent local utility serving a given location is
typically obligated to deliver the commodity to the customers premises from the location where the
supplier delivers electricity energy into that local utilitys delivery system. However, the energy
supplier is responsible for enrolling the energy consumers account with the applicable local
utility and the energy supplier remains liable for any costs resulting from the physical loss of
energy during transmission and delivery to the customers premises. We never buy, sell or take
title to the energy products or environmental commodities on our auction platform.
We typically interface directly with the customer through the brokerage process. However, if a
channel partner is involved, the channel partner will often perform one or more of the following
functions: working with a customer to sign a procurement services agreement, interacting with the
customer relating to World Energy analyses, supporting the decision-making, and interfacing with
the customer during the contracting process. However, even if a channel partner is involved, we are
still primarily responsible for tasks such as interacting with utilities to obtain an energy
consumers usage history, performing analyses, creating RFPs, interfacing with bidders, and
scheduling, conducting and monitoring auctions and collecting the commission earned from the
bidder.
Growth Strategy
Our overall objective is to achieve a preeminent position as the exchange of choice for
executing transactions in energy, energy related services and environmental commodities. We seek to
achieve our objective by expanding our community of channel partners, customers and bidders on our
exchange, strengthening and expanding long-term relationships with government agencies, broadening
our product offerings, making strategic acquisitions, and growing our sales force. Key elements of
our strategy are as follows:
Continuing to Develop Channel Partner Relationships. A significant majority of the customers
using our auction platforms have been introduced to us through our channel partners. Our primary
growth strategy is to focus on developing and increasing our number of channel partner
relationships in an effort to expand the base of customers using our auction platforms. As
illustrated by the diagram below, we have consistently increased the number of channel partners
since 2005 from 16 to 94, and have recently made investments to focus on recruitment and training
in an effort to accelerate the addition of channel partners. We will also consider future
opportunities to work with channel partners who have succeeded in establishing a significant
customer base. The following table sets out the growth in our channel partner relationships over
the last five fiscal years and data is presented at December 31, 2009.
7
Table of Contents
Number of Channel Partners
Strengthening and Expanding Long-term Relationships with Government Agencies. We intend to
build on the relationships we have established with federal, state and local government agencies.
We expect that our expertise in brokering cost-saving energy contracts for government agencies will
continue to be in demand as contract terms expire and governments look to contract for low energy
prices in a competitive market. We also have seen government agencies leading the way in seeking
energy supply from renewable sources and in purchasing Renewable Energy Certificates. We intend to
leverage our government presence into the environmental commodities markets and to secure business
relationships with other state and local governments.
Expand our Share in the Natural Gas Market. While our core competence has traditionally been
in electricity brokerage for retail energy consumers, we significantly expanded our current natural
gas market share with our acquisition of EnergyGateway. This acquisition provided us with
additional staff, natural gas expertise and a post-and-respond software solution to add to our
auction capability. We expect this combination to strengthen our natural gas offering and present
cross-selling opportunities.
Leverage Early Wins in the Wholesale Market. An important rationale for our initial public
offering was to enter the wholesale market where we had initial success in 2006. In 2007, we built
a six-person team specifically focused on the opportunities within the wholesale market. Our
initial successes have been validated as we have now fifty-four wholesale customers of which
thirty-three have contributed to revenue to date. We will continue our push into this market in
order to expand our presence and market share.
Brokering Environmental Commodities. We have expanded our operations by entering into the
environmental commodities market by creating the World Green Exchange. We have successfully
transacted VERs, RECs, and CERs representing substantially all of the currently available
environmental commodity types. In August 2008 we were awarded a two-year contract with RGGI to run
quarterly auctions to sell regulated allowances as established by RGGI, the only regulated
cap-and-trade carbon dioxide allowance program in the United States. We successfully completed the
first six quarterly auctions for RGGI through December 31, 2009 under this two-year program. As
countries attempt to reduce their environmental emissions in order to achieve compliance under the
Kyoto Protocol and U.S.-based initiatives, we believe that the creation and trading of
environmental commodities will accelerate. We also believe that the characteristics of this market
and these commodities, namely lack of liquidity, lack of transparency and product complexity and
differentiation, make our auction process an excellent approach to transacting these commodities.
We are pursuing several sub-markets both domestically and internationally, including serving
utilities seeking to meet their renewable portfolio standards, working with project owners to
maximize the value of their carbon offsets, and facilitating trades between brokers in the
secondary market.
Making Strategic Acquisitions. From time to time, we also pursue strategic acquisitions to
help us expand geographically, add expertise and product depth, provide accretive revenue and
profit streams or a combination of two or more of the above.
Growing our Direct Sales Force. In certain retail markets and in the emerging wholesale
energy and environmental commodities markets, we believe a direct sales presence will be a benefit
to us. A key growth strategy for us has been to open regional offices (in addition to our
Worcester headquarters and Washington, DC sales offices), and staff them with direct sales people.
Our direct, inside sales and account management group numbers twenty-one today, compared to two at
the time of our initial public offering. These professionals are allocated to each of our primary
markets: retail, wholesale and environmental commodities.
8
Table of Contents
Bidders, Listers and Channel Partners
Bidders. Our success is heavily dependent on our bidder relationships, the credibility of our
bidders and the integrity of the auction process. Bidders include over 200 competitive electricity
and natural gas suppliers and over 100 wholesale electricity suppliers registered on the World
Energy Exchange, representing a majority of all suppliers in the deregulated electricity and
natural gas markets. To date, there are over 100 registered bidders on the World Green Exchange. Of
the registered energy suppliers, approximately 100 had active contracts with energy consumers that
were brokered through our World Energy Exchange as of December 31, 2009. One of these bidders
accounted for 15% and 22% in the aggregate of our revenue for the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively. In order to participate in an auction event, bidders must register with us by
either entering into a standard-form agreement pursuant to which the bidder is granted a license to
access our auction platform and bid at auction events or by qualifying to participate in an auction
pursuant to a government solicitation. Our national standard form agreement is typically for an
indefinite term, may be terminated by either party upon 30 days prior written notice, is
non-exclusive, non-transferable and cannot be sublicensed. Under our standard-form agreement or the
government solicitation, the bidder agrees to pay us a commission, which varies from contract to
contract and which is based on a set rate per energy unit consumed by the lister.
Listers. Listers using our auction platform to procure energy and environmental commodities
include government agencies, commercial and industrial energy consumers, utilities, municipal
utilities, environmental commodity project owners, financial institutions and brokers. Government
energy consumers have complex energy needs in terms of both scope and scale, which we believe can
best be met with a technology-based solution such as the World Energy Exchange. Additionally, the
automated nature of our World Energy Exchange auction platform is designed to support protest free
auctions. We have brokered energy for the General Services Administration (GSA) and over 25
federal agencies, Montgomery County, Maryland, the State of Maryland, the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the State of Delaware, the State of New Jersey,
the State of Connecticut and the State of Rhode Island and the 10 Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states
participating in RGGI including New York and the New England states.
Our contracts for the online energy procurements with these governmental entities are
typically for multiple years ranging from two to five years. During this contractual period, the
governmental entity may run various auctions for different locations or agencies that fall under
their purview. As a result, revenue from these customers could extend beyond the actual
contractual term. We have contracts with 7 of the 12 currently deregulated states that are
competitive. As additional states open their electricity markets to competition and suppliers
enter those markets creating a competitive landscape, we plan to actively market our services to
them. These contracts do not require that the government energy consumer use our services and, as
is typical in government procurements, contain termination for convenience clauses. If a contract
was terminated for convenience, it would typically not have any bearing on energy delivered through
the termination date.
One of the energy consumers using our auction platform accounted for approximately 10% in the
aggregate of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009, and two of these energy consumers
accounted for over 10% individually and approximately 23% in the aggregate of our revenue for the
year ended December 31, 2008.
Direct Sales. We also maintain a direct sales arm of our business. Retail targets of direct
sales efforts are typically large companies with facilities in many geographic locations including
hotel chains, property management firms, big box retailers, supermarkets, department stores, drug
stores, convenience stores, restaurant chains, financial services firms and manufacturers across
various industries. We also are pursuing utilities, municipal utilities, and retail energy
providers in the wholesale market, and project owners, customers seeking to meet compliance
obligations, and brokers in the environmental commodities markets.
Channel Partners. We also target customers through our channel partner model. These are firms
with existing client relationships with certain customers that would benefit from the addition of
an online procurement solution. Channel partners consist of a diverse array of companies including
energy service companies, demand side consultants and manufacturers, ABCs and strategic sourcing
companies, but in the most general terms they are resellers or distributors. As of December 31,
2009, we had entered into agreements with 94 channel partners that are currently engaged in efforts
to source potential transactions to our exchanges, although not all have sourced a transaction for
which an auction has been completed. Upon identifying opportunities with new channel partners, we
enter into a channel partner agreement that grants the channel partner a non-exclusive right to
sell our procurement process typically for a term of one year, which renews automatically unless
terminated upon 30 days written notice. The channel partner receives a commission based generally
on the amount of involvement of the channel partner in the procurement process.
Competition
Customers have a broad array of options when purchasing energy or environmental commodities.
Retail energy consumers can either purchase energy directly from the utility at the utilitys rate
or purchase energy in the deregulated market through one of the following types of entities:
competitive energy suppliers, ABCs and online brokers. We compete with competitive energy
suppliers, ABCs and other online brokers for energy consumers that are seeking an alternative to
purchasing directly from the
utility. Wholesale customers typically buy from generators, traders, traditional brokers who
use phone-based methods, or bid-ask exchanges. Environmental commodity customers typically buy or
sell directly through bilateral transactions, brokers, traders or bid-ask exchanges such as the
Chicago Climate Exchange.
9
Table of Contents
Technology
The auction platform, which powers the World Energy and World Green Exchanges, is comprised of
a scalable transaction processing architecture and web-based user interface. The auction platform
is primarily based on internally developed proprietary software, but also includes third party
components for user interface elements and reporting. The auction platform supports the selling and
buying processes including bid placements, bidder registration and management, channel partner
management, deal process management, contract management, site management, collection and
commission management, and reporting. The auction platform maintains current and historical data
online for all of these components.
Our technology systems are monitored and upgraded as necessary to accommodate increasing
levels of traffic and transaction volume on the website. However, future upgrades or additional
technology licensing may be required to ensure optimal performance of our auction platform
services. See Risk Factors at Item 1A. To provide maximum uptime and system availability, our
auction platform is hosted in a multi-tiered, secure, and reliable fault tolerant environment which
includes backup power supply to computer equipment, climate control, as well as physical security
to the building and data center. In the event of a major system component failure, such as a system
motherboard, spare servers are available.
We strive to offer a high level of data security in order to build the confidence in our
services among customers and to protect the participants private information. Our security
infrastructure has been designed to protect data from unauthorized access, both physically and over
the Internet. The most sensitive data and hardware of the exchanges reside at the data centers.
Seasonality
Our revenue is subject to seasonality and fluctuations during the year primarily as a result
of weather conditions and its impact on the demand for energy. Our revenue is generated from the
commissions we receive under any given energy contract, which is tied to the energy consumers
consumption of energy. Therefore, revenue from natural gas consumption tends to be strongest during
the winter months due to the increase in heating usage, and revenue from electricity consumption
tends to be strongest during the summer months due to the increase in air conditioning usage. Our
revenue is also subject to fluctuations within any given season, depending on the severity of
weather conditions during a particularly cold winter or an unseasonably warm summer, energy
consumption will rise.
Intellectual Property
We enter into confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements with third parties with whom we
conduct business in order to limit access to and disclosure of our proprietary information.
We operate our platform under the trade names World Energy Exchange and World Green
Exchange. We own the following registered trademarks in the United States: World Energy Solutions,
World Green Exchange, and World Energy Exchange. We also own the following domain names:
worldenergy.com, wesplatform.com, wexch.com, worldenergyexchange.com, echoicenet.com,
e-choicenet.com, worldenergysolutions.com, worldenergysolutions.net, worldenergy.biz,
worldgreenexchange.com, worldgreenexchange.biz, worldgreenexchange.info, worldgreenexchange.us,
worldpowerexchange.com, and worldenergysolutionsinc.com. To protect our intellectual property, we
rely on a combination of copyright and trade secret laws and the domain name dispute resolution
system.
Our corporate name and certain of our trade names may not be eligible for protection if, for
example, they are generic or in use by another party. We may be unable to prevent competitors from
using trade names or corporate names that are confusingly similar or identical to ours. Until
recently, a company organized under the laws of the State of Florida and whose shares are publicly
traded under the symbol WEGY also operated under the name World Energy Solutions, Inc.
According to its filings with the SEC, this other company changed its name to World Energy
Solutions in November 2005, and is in the business of energy conservation technologies and
environmental sustainability. This appears to be a different business than ours. On January 26,
2009, we entered into a settlement agreement with WEGY pursuant to which WEGY changed its legal
name, ceased use of the phrase World Energy Solutions, and transferred the domain name
worldenergysolutionsinc.com to us.
We do not have any patents and if we are unable to protect our copyrights, trade secrets or
domain names, our business could be adversely affected. Others may claim in the future that we have
infringed their intellectual property rights.
Personnel
As of December 31, 2009, we had fifty-four employees consisting of three members of senior
management, twenty-two sales and marketing employees, two information technology employees,
twenty-one trading desk employees and six administrative employees. In addition, we rely on a
number of consultants and other advisors. The extent and timing of any increase in staffing
will depend on the availability of qualified personnel and other developments in our business.
None of the employees are represented by a labor union, and we believe that we have good
relationships with our employees.
10
Table of Contents
Company Information
We commenced operations through an entity named Oceanside Energy, Inc., or Oceanside, which
was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on September 3, 1996. We incorporated
World Energy Solutions, Inc. under the laws of the State of Delaware under the name World Energy
Exchange, Inc. on June 22, 1999, and on October 31, 1999, Oceanside became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of World Energy Solutions, Inc. through a share exchange whereby Oceanside stockholders
were given shares of common stock of World Energy in exchange for their Oceanside shares. Oceanside
was subsequently dissolved on May 18, 2006. On December 21, 2006, we incorporated a 100% owned
subsidiary, World Energy Securities Corp., under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
On December 5, 2006 we concluded our initial public offering for the sale of 2,300,000 shares
of common stock (as adjusted for our one-for-ten reverse stock split on March 27, 2009) resulting
in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $17.5 million (net of offering costs of
approximately $3.6 million). In connection with the closing of this offering all of the
outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock and non-voting common stock converted into
1,941,631 shares of voting common stock (as adjusted for our one-for-ten reverse stock split on
March 27, 2009).
Our registered and principal office is located at 446 Main Street, Worcester, Massachusetts,
01608, United States of America, and our telephone number is (508) 459-8100. Our website is located
at www.worldenergy.com.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below before deciding to
invest in shares of our common stock. If any of the following risks or uncertainties actually
occurs, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results would likely suffer,
possibly materially. In that event, the market price of our common stock could decline and you
could lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Related to Our Business
We have limited operating experience and a history of operating losses, and we may be subject to
risks inherent in early stage companies, which may make it difficult for you to evaluate our
business and prospects.
We have a limited operating history upon which you can evaluate our business and prospects. We
began assisting in energy transactions in 2001 and introduced our current auction model in April of
that same year. Further, we have a history of losses and, at December 31, 2009, we had an
accumulated deficit of approximately $22.0 million. We cannot provide any assurance that we will
be profitable in any given period or at all. You must consider our business, financial history and
prospects in light of the risks and difficulties we face as an early stage company with a limited
operating history.
A prolonged recession, instability in the financial markets, and insufficient financial sector
liquidity, could negatively impact our business.
The consequences of a prolonged recession could include a lower level of economic activity and
uncertainty regarding energy prices and the capital and commodity markets. A lower level of
economic activity could result in a decline in energy consumption, which could adversely affect our
revenues and future growth. Economic downturns or periods of high energy supply costs typically
lead to reductions in energy consumption and increased conservation measures. During 2009 we
experienced a gradual decline in electricity usage which had a negative impact on our revenue. A
lag in a subsequent recovery could continue to have an adverse effect on our results of operations,
cash flows or financial position. Instability in the financial markets as a result of recession or
otherwise, as well as insufficient financial sector liquidity, also could affect the cost of
capital and both bidders and our ability to raise capital.
Our business is heavily influenced by how much regulated utility prices for energy are above or
below competitive market prices for energy and, accordingly, any changes in regulated prices or
cyclicality or volatility in competitive market prices heavily impacts our business.
When energy prices increase in competitive markets above the price levels of the regulated
utilities, energy consumers are less likely to lock-in to higher fixed price contracts in the
competitive markets and so they are less likely to use our auction platform. Accordingly,
reductions in regulated energy prices can negatively impact our business. Any such reductions in
regulated energy prices over a large geographic area or over a long period of time would have a
material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
Similarly, cyclicality or volatility in competitive market prices that have the effect of driving
those prices above the regulated utility prices will make our auction platform less useful to
energy consumers and will negatively impact our business.
11
Table of Contents
We currently derive a substantial amount of our revenue from the brokerage of electricity, and as
a result our business is highly susceptible to factors affecting the electricity market over which
we have no control.
We derived approximately 56% of our revenue during 2009 from the brokerage of electricity.
Although our reliance on the brokerage of electricity has diminished as we implemented our strategy
to expand brokerage into other markets, we believe that our revenue will continue to be highly
dependent on the level of activity in the electricity market for the near future. Transaction
volume in the electricity market is subject to a number of variables, such as consumption levels,
pricing trends, availability of supply and other variables. We have no control over these
variables, which are affected by geopolitical events such as war, threat of war, terrorism, civil
unrest, political instability, environmental or climatic factors and general economic conditions.
We are particularly vulnerable during periods when energy consumers perceive that electricity
prices are at elevated levels since transaction volume is typically lower when prices are high
relative to regulated utility prices. Accordingly, if electricity transaction volume declines
sharply, our results will suffer.
The online brokerage of energy and environmental commodities is a relatively new and emerging
market and it is uncertain whether our auction model will gain widespread acceptance.
The emergence of competition in the energy and environmental commodities markets is a
relatively recent development, and industry participants have not yet achieved consensus on how to
most efficiently take advantage of the competitive environment. We believe that as the online
energy brokerage industry matures, it is likely to become dominated by a relatively small number of
competitors that can offer access to the largest number of competitive suppliers and consumers.
Brokerage exchanges with the highest levels of transaction volume will likely be able to offer
bidders lower transaction costs and offer listers better prices, which we believe will increasingly
create competitive barriers for smaller online brokerage exchanges. For us to capitalize on our
position as an early entrant into this line of business, we will need to generate widespread
support for our auction platform and continue to rapidly expand the scale of our operations. Other
online auction or non-auction strategies may prove to be more attractive to the industry than our
auction model. If an alternative brokerage exchange model becomes widely accepted in the
electricity industry and/or the environmental commodities brokerage industry we participate in, our
business will be adversely affected.
Our success depends on the widespread adoption of purchasing electricity from competitive sources.
Our success will depend, in large part, on the willingness of CIG energy consumers to embrace
competitive sources of supply, and on the ability of our energy suppliers to consistently source
electricity at competitive rates. In most regions of North America, energy consumers have either no
or relatively little experience purchasing electricity in a competitive environment. Although
electricity consumers in deregulated regions have been switching from incumbent utilities to
competitive sources, there can be no assurance that the trend will continue. In a majority of
states and municipalities, including some areas which are technically deregulated, electricity is
still provided by the incumbent local utility at subsidized rates or at rates that are too low to
stimulate meaningful competition by other providers. In addition, extreme price volatility could
delay or impede the widespread adoption of competitive markets. To the extent that competitive
markets do not continue to develop rapidly our prospects for growth will be constrained. Also,
there can be no assurance that trends in government deregulation of energy will continue or will
not be reversed. Increased regulation of energy would significantly damage our business.
Even if our auction brokerage model achieves widespread acceptance as the preferred means to
transact energy and environmental products, we may be unsuccessful in competing against current
and future competitors.
We expect that competition for online brokerage of energy and environmental products will
intensify in the near future in response to expanding restructured energy markets that permit
consumer choice of energy sources and as technological advances create incentives to develop more
efficient and less costly energy procurement in regional and global markets. The barriers to entry
into the online brokerage marketplace are relatively low, and we expect to face increased
competition from traditional off-line energy brokers, other established participants in the energy
industry, online services companies that can launch online auction services that are similar to
ours and demand response providers.
Many of our competitors and potential competitors have longer operating histories, better
brand recognition and significantly greater financial resources than we do. The management of some
of these competitors may have more experience in implementing their business plan and strategy and
they may have pre-existing commercial or other relationships with large listers and/or bidders
which would give them a competitive advantage. We expect that as competition in the online
marketplace increases, brokerage commissions for the energy and environmental commodities
industries will decline, which could have a negative impact on the level of brokerage fees we can
charge per transaction and may reduce the relative attractiveness of our exchange services. We
expect that our costs relating to marketing and human resources may increase as our competitors
undertake marketing campaigns to enhance their brand names and to increase the volume of business
conducted through their exchanges. We also expect many of our competitors to expend financial and
other resources to improve their network and system infrastructure to compete more aggressively.
Our inability to adequately address these and other competitive pressures would have a material
adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
12
Table of Contents
If we are unable to rapidly implement some or all of our major strategic initiatives, our ability
to improve our competitive position may be negatively impacted.
Our strategy is to improve our competitive position by implementing certain key strategic
initiatives in advance of competitors, including the following:
| continue to develop channel partner relationships; |
| strengthen and expand long-term relationships with government agencies; |
| target other energy-related markets; |
| target utilities in order to broker energy-related products for them; |
| further develop a green credits auction platform; |
| make strategic acquisitions; and |
| grow our direct sales force. |
While we have made significant progress in pursuing these initiatives, we cannot assure you
that we will be successful in executing against any of these key strategic initiatives, or that our
time to market will be sooner than that of competitors. Some of these initiatives relate to new
services or products for which there are no established markets, or in which we lack experience and
expertise. If we are unable to continue to implement some or all of our key strategic initiatives
in an effective and timely manner, our ability to improve our competitive position may be
negatively impacted, which would have a material and adverse effect on our business and prospects.
Our costs will continue to increase as we expand our business and in the event that our revenue
does not increase proportionately, we will generate significant operating losses in the future.
We have significantly increased our operating expenses as we expanded our brokerage
capabilities to offer additional energy-related products, increased our sales and marketing efforts
and developed our administrative organization. We also are incurring increased costs as a result of
being a publicly held company with shares listed on both the NASDAQ Capital Market and the Toronto
Stock Exchange (TSX). As we continue to expand our business, we may incur additional operating
losses. For the year ended December 31, 2009 we incurred a net loss of approximately $2.3 million,
which was a direct result of these increased costs. In addition, our budgeted expense levels are
based, in significant part, on our expectations as to future revenue and are largely fixed in the
short term. As a result, we may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for
any unexpected shortfall in revenue which could compound those losses in any given fiscal period.
We depend on the services of our senior executives and other key personnel, the loss of whom could
negatively affect our business.
Our future performance will depend substantially on the continued services of our senior
management and other key personnel, including our chief information officer, senior vice president
of operations and our market directors. If any one or more of such persons leave their positions
and we are unable to find suitable replacement personnel in a timely and cost efficient manner, our
business may be disrupted and we may not be able to achieve our business objectives, including our
ability to manage our growth and successfully implement our strategic initiatives. We do not have
long-term employment agreements with any of our senior management or other key personnel and we do
not have a non-competition agreement with our current chief executive officer.
We must also continue to seek ways to retain and motivate all of our employees through various
means, including through enhanced compensation packages. In addition, we will need to hire more
employees as we continue to implement our key strategy of building on our market position and
expanding our business. Competition for qualified personnel in the areas in which we compete
remains intense and the pool of qualified candidates is limited. Our failure to attract, hire and
retain qualified staff on a cost efficient basis would have a material adverse effect on our
business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and ability to successfully
implement our growth strategies.
We do not have contracts for fixed volumes with the bidders who use our auction platform and we
depend on a small number of key bidders, and the partial or complete loss of one or more of these
bidders as a participant on our auction platform could undermine our ability to execute effective
auctions.
We do not have contracts for fixed volumes with any of the bidders who use our auction
platform. One of these bidders represented 15% and 22% of our revenue for the years ended December
31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The loss of this or other significant bidders will negatively
impact our operations, particularly in the absence of our ability to locate additional national
bidders. We do not have agreements with any of these bidders preventing them from directly
competing with us or utilizing competing services.
13
Table of Contents
We depend on a small number of key listers for a significant portion of our revenue, many of which
are government entities that have no obligation to use our auction platform or continue their
relationship with us, and the partial or complete loss of business of one or more of these
consumers could negatively affect our business.
Our listers are comprised primarily of large businesses and government organizations. One of
these listers represented 10% of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009, and two of these
listers accounted for over 10% individually and 23% in the aggregate of our revenue for the year
ended December 31, 2008. Our government contracts are typically for multiple years but are subject
to government funding contingencies and cancellation for convenience clauses. Although our
non-government contracts create a short-term exclusive relationship with the lister, typically this
exclusivity relates only to the specific auction event and expires during the term of the energy
contract. Accordingly, we do not have ongoing commitments from these listers to purchase any of
their incremental energy or environmental commodity requirements utilizing our auction platform,
and they are not prohibited from using competing brokerage services. The loss of any of these key
listers will negatively impact our revenue, particularly in the absence of our ability to attract
additional listers to use our service.
We depend on our channel partners to establish and develop certain of our relationships with
listers and the loss of certain channel partners could result in the loss of certain key listers.
We rely on our channel partners to establish certain of our relationships with listers. Our
ability to maintain our relationships with our channel partners will impact our operations and
revenue. We depend on the financial viability of our channel partners and their success in
procuring listers on our behalf. One of our channel partners was involved with identifying and
qualifying listers which entered into contracts that accounted for 24% and 32% of our revenue for
the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Channel partners may be involved in
various aspects of a deal including but not limited to lead identification, the selling process,
project management, data gathering, contract negotiation, deal closing and post-auction account
management. To the extent that a channel partner ceases to do business with us, or goes bankrupt,
dissolves, or otherwise ceases to carry on business, we may lose access to that channel partners
existing client base, in which case the volume of energy traded through the World Energy Exchange
will be adversely affected and our revenue will decline.
Our business depends heavily on information technology systems the interruption or
unavailability of which could materially damage our operations.
The satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of our exchange, processing systems
and network infrastructure are critical to our reputation and our ability to attract and retain
listers and bidders to our exchanges. Our efforts to mitigate systems risks may not be adequate and
the risk of a system failure or interruption cannot be eliminated. Although we have never
experienced an unscheduled interruption of service, any such interruption in our services may
result in an immediate, and possibly substantial, loss of revenue and damage to our reputation.
Our
business also depends upon the use of the Internet as a transactions medium. Therefore, we
must remain current with Internet use and technology developments. Our current technological
architecture may not effectively or efficiently support our changing business requirements.
Any substantial increase in service activities or transaction volume on our exchanges may
require us to expand and upgrade our technology, transaction processing systems and network
infrastructure. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully do so, and any
failure could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Breaches of online security could damage or disrupt our reputation and our ability to do business.
To succeed, online communications must provide a secure transmission of confidential
information over public networks. Security measures that are implemented may not always prevent
security breaches that could harm our business. Although to our knowledge we have never experienced
a breach of online security, compromise of our security could harm our reputation, cause users to
lose confidence in our security systems and to not source their energy and environmental
commodities using our auction platform and also subject us to lawsuits, sanctions, fines and other
penalties. In addition, a party who is able to circumvent our security measures could
misappropriate proprietary information, cause interruptions in our operations, damage our computers
or those of our users, or otherwise damage our reputation and business. Our insurance policies may
not be adequate to reimburse us for losses caused by security breaches.
We may need to expend significant resources to protect against security breaches or to address
problems caused by breaches. These issues are likely to become more difficult and costly as our
business expands.
We depend on third-party service and technology providers and any loss or break-down in those
relationships could damage our operations significantly if we are unable to find alternative
providers.
We depend on a number of third-party providers for web hosting, elements of our online auction
system, data management and other systems, as well as communications and networking equipment,
computer hardware and software and related support and maintenance. There can be no assurance that
any of these providers will be able to continue to provide these services without interruption and
in an efficient, cost-effective manner or that they will be able to adequately meet our needs as
our transaction volume increases. An interruption in or the cessation of such third-party services
and our inability to make alternative arrangements in a timely manner, or at all, could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating
results. There is also no assurance that any agreements that we have in place with such
third-party providers will be renewed, or if renewed, renewed on favorable terms.
14
Table of Contents
To the extent that we expand our operations into foreign markets, additional costs and risks
associated with doing business internationally will apply.
It is possible that we will have international operations in the future. These operations may
include the brokering of green credits in countries signatory to the Kyoto Protocol and the
brokering of energy in other geographic markets where we believe the demand for our services may be
strong. To the extent we enter geographic markets outside of the United States, our international
operations will be subject to a number of risks and potential costs, including:
| different regulatory requirements governing the energy marketplace; |
| difficulty in establishing, staffing and managing international operations; |
| regulatory regimes governing the Internet and auctioneering that may limit or
prevent our operations in some jurisdictions; |
| different and more stringent data privacy laws; |
| differing intellectual property laws; |
| differing contract laws that prevent the enforceability of agreements between energy
suppliers and energy consumers; |
| the imposition of special taxes, including local taxation of our fees or of
transactions through our exchange; |
| strong local competitors; |
| currency fluctuations; and |
| political and economic instability. |
Our failure to manage the risks associated with international operations could limit the
future growth of our business and adversely affect our operating results. We may be required to
make a substantial financial investment and expend significant management efforts in connection
with any international expansion.
The application of taxes including sales taxes and other taxes could negatively affect our
business.
The application of indirect taxes (such as sales and use tax, value added tax, goods and
services tax, business tax, and gross receipt tax) to e-commerce businesses and our users is a
complex and evolving issue. Many of the fundamental statutes and regulations that impose these
taxes were established before the growth of the Internet and e-commerce. In many cases, it is not
clear how existing statutes apply to the Internet or e-commerce. In addition, some jurisdictions
have implemented or may implement laws specifically addressing the Internet or some aspect of
e-commerce. The application of existing or future laws could have adverse effects on our business.
Several proposals have been made at the United States state and local level that would impose
additional taxes on the sale of goods and services through the Internet. These proposals, if
adopted, could substantially impair the growth of e-commerce, and could diminish our opportunity to
derive financial benefit from our activities. The United States federal governments moratorium on
states and other local authorities imposing access or discriminatory taxes on the Internet, which
was scheduled to expire on November 1, 2007, has been extended by seven years. This moratorium,
however, does not prohibit federal, state, or local authorities from collecting taxes on our income
or generally from collecting taxes that are due under existing tax rules.
In conjunction with the Streamlined Sales Tax Project an ongoing, multi-year effort by
certain state and local governments to require collection and remittance of distant sales tax by
out-of-state sellers bills have been introduced in the U.S. Congress to overturn the Supreme
Courts Quill decision, which limits the ability of state governments to require sellers outside of
their own state to collect and remit sales taxes on goods purchased by in-state residents. An
overturning of the Quill decision would harm our users and our business.
The passage of new legislation and the imposition of additional tax requirements could
increase the costs to bidders and listers using our auction platform and, accordingly, could harm
our business. There have been, and will continue to be, ongoing costs associated with complying
with the various indirect tax requirements in the numerous states, localities or countries in which
we currently conduct or will conduct business.
U.S. federal or state legislative or regulatory reform of the current systems governing
commodities or energy may affect our ability to conduct our business profitably.
We are currently not regulated as an energy provider, broker or commodities dealer. Changes to
the laws or regulations governing activities related to commodities trading or energy procurement,
supply, distribution or sale, or transacting in energy-related products or securities could
adversely affect the profitability of our brokerage operations or even our ability to conduct
auctions. Changes to the current regulatory framework could result in additional costs and expenses
or prohibit certain of our
current business activities or future business plans. We cannot predict the form any such
legislation or rule making may take, the probability of passage, and the ultimate effect on us.
15
Table of Contents
We may expand our business through the acquisition of other businesses and technologies which will
present special risks.
We may expand our business in certain areas through the acquisition of businesses,
technologies, products and services from other businesses. Acquisitions involve a number of special
problems, including:
| the need to incur additional indebtedness, issue stock or use cash in order to
complete the acquisition; |
| difficulty integrating acquired technologies, operations and personnel with the
existing business; |
| diversion of management attention in connection with both negotiating the
acquisitions and integrating the assets; |
| strain on managerial and operational resources as management tries to oversee larger
operations; |
| the funding requirements for acquired companies may be significant; |
| exposure to unforeseen liabilities of acquired companies; |
| increased risk of costly and time-consuming litigation, including stockholder
lawsuits; and |
| potential issuance of securities in connection with an acquisition with rights that
are superior to the rights of our common stockholders, or which may have a dilutive
effect on our common stockholders. |
We may not be able to successfully address these problems. Our future operating results will
depend to a significant degree on our ability to successfully integrate acquisitions and manage
operations while also controlling expenses and cash burn.
Risks Relating to Intellectual Property
We may be unable to adequately protect our intellectual property, which could harm us and affect
our ability to compete effectively.
We have developed proprietary software, logos, brands, service names and web sites, including
our proprietary auction platform. Although we have taken certain limited steps to protect our
proprietary intellectual property (including consulting with outside patent and trademark counsel
regarding protection of our intellectual property and implementing a program to protect our trade
secrets), we have not applied for any patents with respect to our auction platform. We have
registered the following trademarks in the United States and certain other countries: World Energy
Solutions, World Green Exchange, and World Energy Exchange, and we filed applications for these
trademarks in additional countries. The steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property
may be inadequate to deter misappropriation of our proprietary information or deter independent
development of similar technologies by others. We may not be able to prevent the unauthorized
disclosure or use of our technical knowledge or trade secrets by consultants, vendors, former
employees and current employees, despite the existence of confidentiality agreements and other
contractual restrictions. If our intellectual property rights are not adequately protected, we may
not be able to continue to commercialize our services. We may be unable to detect the unauthorized
use of, or take adequate steps to enforce, our intellectual property rights. In addition, certain
of our trade names may not be eligible for protection if, for example, they are generic or in use
by another party. Accordingly, we may be unable to prevent competitors from using trade names that
are confusingly similar or identical to ours.
Our auction platform, services, technologies or usage of trade names could infringe the
intellectual property rights of others, which may lead to litigation that could itself be costly,
could result in the payment of substantial damages or royalties, and/or prevent us from using
technology that is essential to our business.
Although no third party has threatened or alleged that our auction platform, services,
technologies or usage of trade names infringe their patents or other intellectual property rights,
we cannot assure you that we do not infringe the patents or other intellectual property rights of
third parties.
Infringement and other intellectual property claims and proceedings brought against us,
whether successful or not, could result in substantial costs and harm to our reputation. Defending
our intellectual property rights could result in the expenditure of significant financial and
managerial resources, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operating
results. If our business is successful, the possibility may increase that others will assert
infringement claims against us.
We use intellectual property licensed from third parties in our operations. There is a risk
that such licenses may be terminated, which could significantly disrupt our business. In such an
event, we may be required to spend significant time and money to develop a non-infringing system or
process or license intellectual property that does not infringe upon the rights of that other party
or to obtain a license for the intellectual property from the owner. We may not be successful in
that development or any such license may not be available on commercially acceptable terms, if at
all. In addition, any litigation could be lengthy and costly and could adversely affect us even if
we are successful in such litigation.
Our corporate name and certain of our trade names may not be eligible for protection if, for
example, they are generic or in use by another party. We may be unable to prevent competitors from
using trade names or corporate names that are confusingly similar or identical to ours. Until
recently, a company organized under the laws of the State of Florida and whose shares are
publicly traded under the symbol WEGY also operated under the name World Energy Solutions,
Inc. According to its filings with the SEC, this other company changed its name to World Energy
Solutions in November 2005, and is in the business of energy conservation technologies and
environmental sustainability. This appears to be a different business than ours. On January 26,
2009, we entered into a settlement agreement with WEGY pursuant to which WEGY changed its legal
name, ceased use of the phrase World Energy Solutions, and transferred the domain name
worldenergysolutionsinc.com to us.
16
Table of Contents
Risks Relating to Ownership of Our Common Stock
Because there is a limited trading history for our common stock and our stock price may be
volatile, you may not be able to resell your shares at or above your purchase price.
We cannot predict the extent to which investors interests will provide an active trading
market for our common stock or whether the market price of our common stock will be volatile. The
market for early stage Internet and technology stocks has been extremely volatile. The following
factors, many of which are outside of our control, could cause the market price of our common stock
to decrease significantly from recent prices:
| loss of any of the major listers or bidders using our auction platform; |
| departure of key personnel; |
| variations in our quarterly operating results; |
| announcements by our competitors of significant contracts, new transaction
capabilities, enhancements, lower fees, acquisitions, distribution partnerships, joint
ventures or capital commitments; |
| changes in governmental regulations and standards affecting the energy industry and
our products, including implementation of additional regulations relating to consumer
data privacy; |
| decreases in financial estimates by equity research analysts; |
| sales of common stock or other securities by us in the future; and |
| fluctuations in stock market prices and volumes. |
In the past, securities class action litigation often has been initiated against a company
following a period of volatility in the market price of the companys securities. If class action
litigation is initiated against us, we will incur substantial costs and our managements attention
will be diverted from our operations. All of these factors could cause the market price of our
stock to decline, and you may lose some or all of your investment. Also due to the size of the
market capitalization of our shares, the market for our common stock may be volatile and may not
afford a high level of liquidity.
Future sales of our common stock by persons who were stockholders prior to our initial public
offering or who required restricted securities that became available for public resale could cause
our stock price to decline.
A substantial portion of our stockholders prior to our initial public offering were subject to
lock-up agreements with the underwriters that restricted their ability to transfer their stock for
at least 365 days after the date of the offering. On November 30, 2007, these lock-up provisions
expired and an additional 433,687 shares of our common stock became eligible for sale in the public
market. In addition, in January 2007 we filed a registration statement with the SEC covering all of
the shares subject to options outstanding, but not exercised, and all of the shares available for
future issuance under our stock incentive plans. In November 2007, we filed a registration
statement with the SEC covering all of the shares issued to the former owner of the EnergyGateway
shares. The perception in the public market that our stockholders might sell shares of common
stock could also depress the market price of our common stock. A decline in the price of shares of
our common stock might impede our ability to raise capital through the issuance of additional
shares of our common stock or other equity securities, and may cause you to lose part or all of
your investment in our shares of common stock.
Our directors and executive officers have substantial control over us and could limit your ability
to influence the outcome of key transactions, including changes of control.
As of December 31, 2009 our executive officers and directors and entities affiliated with
them, beneficially own, in the aggregate, approximately 27% of our outstanding common stock. In
particular, Richard Domaleski, our chief executive officer, beneficially owns approximately 22% of
our outstanding common stock. Our executive officers, directors and affiliated entities, if acting
together, would be able to control or influence significantly all matters requiring approval by our
stockholders, including the election of directors and the approval of mergers or other significant
corporate transactions. These stockholders may have interests that differ from yours, and they may
vote in a way with which you disagree and that may be adverse to your interests. The concentration
of ownership of our common stock may have the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change
of control of our company, could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium
for their common stock as part of a sale of our company, and may affect the market price of our
common stock.
17
Table of Contents
Our corporate documents and Delaware law make a takeover of our company more difficult, we have a
classified board of directors and certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and
by-laws require a super-majority vote to amend, all of which may prevent certain changes in
control and limit the market price of our common stock.
Our charter and by-laws contain provisions that might enable our management to resist a
takeover of our company. Our certificate of incorporation and by-laws establish a classified board
of directors such that our directors serve staggered three-year terms and do not all stand for
re-election every year. In addition, any action required or permitted to be taken by our
stockholders at an annual meeting or special meeting of stockholders may only be taken if it is
properly brought before the meeting and may not be taken by written action in lieu of a meeting,
and special meetings of the stockholders may only be called by the chairman of the Board, the Chief
Executive Officer or our Board. Further, our certificate of incorporation provides that directors
may be removed only for cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of 75% of our shares of
capital stock entitled to vote, and any vacancy on our Board, including a vacancy resulting from an
enlargement of our Board, may only be filled by vote of a majority of our directors then in office.
In addition, our by-laws establish an advance notice procedure for stockholder proposals to be
brought before an annual meeting of stockholders, including proposed nominations of persons for
election to the Board. These provisions of our certificate of incorporation and by-laws, including
those setting forth the classified board, require a super-majority vote of stockholders to amend.
These provisions might discourage, delay or prevent a change in the control of our company or a
change in our management. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more
difficult for you and other stockholders to elect directors and take other corporate actions. The
existence of these provisions could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the
future for shares of our common stock.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
We do not own any real property. We lease the business premises in the following locations for
the stated principal uses:
Approx. Floor | ||||||
Location | Space (Sq. Ft.) | Principal Use | ||||
446 Main Street, Worcester, MA (1) |
7,458 | Executive office and general administration | ||||
1215 19th Street NW, Washington, DC (2) |
400 | Branch office | ||||
10001 Woodloch Forest Drive, The Woodlands, TX (3) |
2,027 | Branch office | ||||
770 East Market Street, West Chester, PA (4) |
575 | Branch office | ||||
4495 Bradenton Avenue, Dublin OH (5) |
4,500 | Branch office |
Note: |
||
(1) | Pursuant to a five year lease agreement with Sovereign Bank, as
amended, expiring December 31, 2010, at a monthly rate of $12,430 plus
operating expenses and taxes. |
|
(2) | Pursuant to a five-year lease agreement with Roosevelt Land, LP
expiring July 16, 2011, at a monthly rate of $5,000, plus operating
expenses and taxes. |
|
(3) | Pursuant to a five-year lease agreement with NNN Waterway Plaza,
expiring March 31, 2012, at a monthly rate escalating to $5,574, plus
operating expenses and taxes. |
|
(4) | Pursuant to a two-year lease agreement, as amended, with High
Associates LTD expiring March 31, 2010, at a monthly rate escalating
to $970, plus certain operating expenses. |
|
(5) | Pursuant to a 62-month lease agreement with Rickert Property
Management, expiring July 31, 2012, at a monthly rate escalating to
$3,750, plus operating expenses and taxes. |
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
From time to time we may be a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary
course of our business. Our management is not aware of any litigation outstanding, threatened or
pending as of the date hereof by or against us or our properties which we believe would be material
to our financial condition or results of operations.
Item 4. Reserved
18
Table of Contents
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Our common stock began trading on the TSX (Symbol XWE) on November 16, 2006, and on the
NASDAQ (Symbol XWES) on April 6, 2009. Prior to trading on the TSX, there was no established
public trading market for our common stock.
On March 27, 2009, we filed a previously approved Certificate of Amendment to the Companys
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Delaware to (i)
effect a reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock at a ratio of one-for-ten; and (ii)
decrease the number of authorized shares of our common stock from 150,000,000 to 15,000,000. As a
result of the reverse stock split, the issued and outstanding shares of common stock were reduced
on a basis of one share for every ten shares outstanding. All of our stock related information
including issued and outstanding common stock, stock options and warrants to purchase common stock,
restricted stock and loss per share for all periods presented have been restated to reflect the
reverse stock split.
The following table sets forth the high and low closing prices per share reported on the
NASDAQ for April 6, 2009 and periods subsequent to that date, and on the TSX for periods prior to
April 6, 2009 (in U.S. $s):
High | Low | |||||||
2009: |
||||||||
First quarter |
$ | 3.85 | $ | 2.10 | ||||
Second quarter |
$ | 7.86 | $ | 3.16 | ||||
Third quarter |
$ | 5.20 | $ | 3.00 | ||||
Fourth quarter |
$ | 3.87 | $ | 2.72 | ||||
2008: |
||||||||
First quarter |
$ | 9.57 | $ | 7.01 | ||||
Second quarter |
$ | 14.19 | $ | 8.76 | ||||
Third quarter |
$ | 11.35 | $ | 3.73 | ||||
Fourth quarter |
$ | 4.43 | $ | 1.37 |
On February 19, 2010, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the NASDAQ was $2.90
per share and there were 116 holders of record of our common stock.
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to
retain our future earnings, if any, to finance the expansion of our business and do not expect to
pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.
Information regarding our equity compensation plans required by this item is incorporated by
reference to the information appearing under the caption Equity Compensation Plan Information in
our definitive Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
We issued shares of common stock pursuant to common stock purchase agreements entered into
with The Pressberg Living Trust U/A/D March 10, 2006 (for the purchase of 336,700 shares of common
stock on November 5, 2009), The Wolf Family Limited Partnership (for the purchase of 94,482 shares
of common stock on January 4, 2010), Feiler Trust Dtd 2/2/01 (for the purchase of 19,305 shares of
common stock on January 21, 2010) and Marc J. Warren (for the purchase of 38,610 shares of common
stock on January 22, 2010). Proceeds from the transaction will be used for general corporate
purposes, including supporting our growth initiatives. The sales were unregistered and were
conducted pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506 of
Regulation D promulgated thereunder.
Repurchase of Equity Securities
In connection with the vesting of restricted stock granted to employees, we withheld shares
with value equivalent to employees minimum statutory obligations for the applicable income and
other employment taxes. A summary of the shares withheld to satisfy employee tax withholding
obligations for the three months ended December 31, 2009 is as follows:
Total Number of | Maximum | |||||||||||||||
Total | Shares Purchased | Number of Shares | ||||||||||||||
Number of | Average | As Part of Publicly | That May Yet Be | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price Paid | Announced Plans | Purchased Under | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased | Per Share | Or Programs | The Plan | ||||||||||||
10/01/09 10/31/09 |
201 | $ | 3.01 | | | |||||||||||
11/01/09 11/30/09 |
60 | $ | 3.01 | | | |||||||||||
12/01/09 12/31/09 |
1,329 | $ | 3.17 | | | |||||||||||
Total |
1,590 | $ | 3.14 | | | |||||||||||
19
Table of Contents
Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data
The following table summarizes our consolidated financial data for the periods presented. You
should read the following financial information together with the information under Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated
financial statements and the notes to those consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere
in this annual report. The selected consolidated statements of operations data for the fiscal years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008 are derived from the audited consolidated financial statements, which
are included elsewhere in this document. The selected consolidated statements of operations data
for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidated balance sheet data at December
31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included
in this document. The financial data reflects the Companys acquisition of EnergyGateway as of
June 1, 2007. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in
future periods.
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Statement of Operations
Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 14,618,275 | $ | 12,444,692 | $ | 9,188,265 | $ | 5,763,098 | $ | 4,673,987 | ||||||||||
Cost of revenue |
3,709,957 | 4,552,215 | 2,874,678 | 1,166,426 | 648,410 | |||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
10,908,318 | 7,892,477 | 6,313,587 | 4,596,672 | 4,025,577 | |||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
9,714,900 | 10,057,361 | 8,598,256 | 3,227,263 | 2,649,786 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
3,520,886 | 4,669,807 | 5,858,810 | 1,862,450 | 995,703 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
13,235,786 | 14,727,168 | 14,457,066 | 5,089,713 | 3,645,489 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(2,327,468 | ) | (6,834,691 | ) | (8,143,479 | ) | (493,041 | ) | 380,088 | |||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
(6,051 | ) | 39,531 | 563,294 | (312,280 | ) | (86,838 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(2,333,519 | ) | (6,795,160 | ) | (7,580,185 | ) | (805,321 | ) | 293,250 | |||||||||||
Income tax (expense) benefit |
| | (1,061,720 | ) | 304,228 | 754,000 | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
(2,333,519 | ) | (6,795,160 | ) | (8,641,905 | ) | (501,093 | ) | 1,047,250 | |||||||||||
Accretion of preferred stock issuance
costs |
| | | (6,299 | ) | (7,199 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to
common stockholders |
$ | (2,333,519 | ) | $ | (6,795,160 | ) | $ | (8,641,905 | ) | $ | (507,392 | ) | $ | 1,040,051 | ||||||
Net income (loss) available to
common stockholders per share: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic Voting |
$ | (0.27 | ) | $ | (0.82 | ) | $ | (1.08 | ) | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | 0.21 | ||||||
Basic Non-Voting |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 0.21 | ||||||||||
Diluted Voting and Non-Voting |
$ | (0.27 | ) | $ | (0.82 | ) | $ | (1.08 | ) | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | 0.15 | ||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Voting Common Stock |
8,512,060 | 8,310,315 | 7,979,359 | 4,557,648 | 3,304,947 | |||||||||||||||
Non-Voting Common Stock |
| | | | 677,833 | |||||||||||||||
Total Common Stock-Basic |
8,512,060 | 8,310,315 | 7,979,359 | 4,557,648 | 3,982,780 | |||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding
Diluted: |
8,512,060 | 8,310,315 | 7,979,359 | 4,557,648 | 5,450,656 | |||||||||||||||
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 2,046,909 | $ | 1,731,411 | $ | 7,001,884 | $ | 17,483,886 | $ | 1,584,066 | ||||||||||
Working capital |
1,548,986 | 742,478 | 5,323,622 | 16,639,898 | 1,372,542 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
13,894,125 | 14,776,640 | 20,800,565 | 20,791,381 | 3,787,842 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term liabilities |
16,003 | 3,737 | 46,222 | 87,844 | 1,879,745 | |||||||||||||||
Series A redeemable convertible
preferred stock |
| | | | 1,501,698 | |||||||||||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(21,981,951 | ) | (19,648,432 | ) | (12,853,272 | ) | (4,211,367 | ) | (3,710,274 | ) | ||||||||||
Total stockholders equity (deficit) |
$ | 10,258,142 | $ | 11,009,131 | $ | 16,859,799 | $ | 17,945,002 | $ | (938,883 | ) |
20
Table of Contents
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results
of operations together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing
elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Some of the information contained in this discussion
and analysis includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should
review the Risk Factors section of this Annual Report for a discussion of important factors that
could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the
forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.
Overview
World Energy is an energy and environmental commodities brokerage company that has developed
two online auction platforms, the World Energy Exchange and the World Green Exchange. On the World
Energy Exchange, retail energy consumers (commercial, industrial and governmental) and wholesale
energy participants (utilities, electricity retailers, and intermediaries) in the United States
(listers) are able to negotiate for the purchase or sale of electricity and other energy
resources from competing energy suppliers (bidders) which have agreed to participate on our
auction platform. The World Energy Exchange is supplemented with information about market rules,
pricing trends, energy consumer usage and load profiles. Our procurement staff uses this auction
platform to conduct auctions, analyze results, guide energy consumers through contracting, and
track their contracts, sites, accounts and usage history. Although our primary source of revenue is
from brokering electricity and natural gas, we adapted our World Energy Exchange auction platform
to accommodate the brokering of green power in 2003 (i.e. electricity generated by renewable
resources), wholesale electricity in 2004 and certain other energy-related products in 2005. In
2007, we created the World Green Exchange based on the World Energy Exchange technology and
business process. On the World Green Exchange, bidders and listers negotiate for the purchase or
sale of environmental commodities such as Renewable Energy Certificates, Verified Emissions
Reductions, Certified Emissions Reductions and Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI)
allowances.
On November 16, 2006, we completed our initial public offering of common stock for the sale of
2,300,000 shares of common stock (IPO) (as adjusted for the one-for-ten reverse stock split
described below), resulting in net proceeds to us of approximately $17.5 million (net of offering
costs of approximately $3.6 million).
On June 1, 2007, we acquired substantially all of the assets of EG Partners, LLC, formerly
known as EnergyGateway LLC (EnergyGateway), for $4,951,758 in cash and 537,500 common shares of
World Energy (as adjusted for the one-for-ten reverse stock split described below) plus the
assumption of certain liabilities. The EnergyGateway operations are included in these financial
statements from June 1, 2007.
On March 27, 2009, we filed a previously approved Certificate of Amendment to the Companys
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Delaware to (i)
effect a reverse stock split of its outstanding common stock at a ratio of one-for-ten; and (ii)
decrease the number of authorized shares of its common stock from 150,000,000 to 15,000,000. As a
result of the reverse stock split, the issued and outstanding shares of common stock were reduced
on a basis of one share for every ten shares outstanding. All of our stock related information
including issued and outstanding common stock, stock options and warrants to purchase common stock,
restricted stock and loss per share for all periods presented have been restated to reflect the
reverse stock split.
On October 30, 2009, we entered into an agreement with Bond Capital, Ltd. (Bond), a
strategic partner of ours, for the purchase of up to $2.5 million of World Energys common stock.
Pursuant to the agreement, a purchasing entity, an affiliate of Bond, acquired $1.0 million of our
common stock at $2.97 per share on November 6, 2009. We agreed to offer an additional $1.5 million
in World Energy shares on the same terms to Bond or its designee, with the price to be determined
at the time of investment, through January 15, 2010. Subsequent to December 31, 2009, affiliates of
Bond purchased an additional $400,000 of our common stock at an average price of $2.63 per share
bringing the net amount raised under the financing agreement to $1.3 million.
Since our IPO we significantly grew our employee base from 20 at December 31, 2006 to a high
of 66 during the second quarter of 2008. This planned investment allowed us to pursue our strategic
initiatives as outlined in our IPO resulting in revenue growth of over 250% since the fourth
quarter of 2006. We aggressively invested in all of our product lines in 2007 including building
out a direct sales force, expanding our channel partner network and acquiring our largest
competitor in our retail product line and building our wholesale and green teams to pursue the
opportunities within both of those emerging markets. As our infrastructure investment continued
during the first nine months of 2007 in advance of revenue growth, our operating losses increased
significantly. These investments began to generate incremental revenue in the fourth quarter of
2007 and we were able to regain the scalability of our business model and reduce our fixed
operating costs in the latter half of 2008 and into 2009. The reductions in operating costs
resulted from operating efficiencies created by the integration of the EnergyGateway operation and
adjustments to our organizational structure as we realigned our staffing and cost structure to
match the revenue opportunities as they developed. Our gross margins have increased steadily during
2009 and our operating loss has declined significantly. During the fourth quarter of 2009, our
operating loss was approximately $0.2 million and cash provided by operating activities was
approximately $0.5 million. The $0.5 million from cash provided by operating activities was
attributable to $0.3 million from
operating activities as non-cash expense items exceeded the net loss during the fourth quarter
and $0.2 million from changes in operating assets and liabilities. We believe that our fixed
operating cost structure will remain at current levels in the short-term. However, a portion of our
operating costs, including channel partner and internal commission structures, are variable in
nature and will increase as revenue levels increase.
21
Table of Contents
Calendar year 2008 saw dramatic swings in commodity prices as well as a sharp contraction in
the general economy in the third quarter. Beginning in the latter half of the first quarter of 2008
and continuing into the early part of the third quarter of 2008, there was a sharp rise in
electricity and natural gas prices, and the third and fourth quarters saw a reversal of this trend
as commodity prices fell as sharply as they rose. For our business, we saw some customers in our
wholesale and retail product lines delay their energy procurement decisions when prices rose, and
then saw them return to the market when prices fell. We believe this pricing environment
contributed to an increase in procurement activity in our retail and wholesale product lines during
the second half of 2008 and the first six months of 2009 as compared to the same period in the
prior year.
U.S. and global economic conditions worsened significantly in the fourth quarter of 2008. The
stress on international credit markets due to the sharp contraction of the general economy led to a
dramatic tightening in liquidity. The U.S. government responded with several initiatives to
alleviate the strain on the financial markets. While these programs have had some positive effects
on financial systems, credit remains tight and economic conditions in the U.S. and globally remain
uncertain. As a result of the decline in economic output, energy demand in many regions was lower,
which led to reduced sales and lower margins. While we did experience a decline in reported usage
during the first six months of 2009, energy demand was still within our long-term historical norms.
During the last 6-months of 2009, however, we experienced an approximate 4.5% decline in
electricity usage, which resulted in a 2.4% reduction in expected revenue. While we believe that
electricity usage will return to long-term historical trends as economic conditions improve, we do
expect that energy demand will continue to be affected in the near term as companies cut back
production, close plants and delay hiring and purchasing decisions.
Operations
Revenue
Retail Electricity Transactions
We earn a monthly commission on energy sales contracted through our online auction platform
from each bidder or energy supplier based on the energy usage transacted between the energy
supplier and lister or energy consumer. Our commissions are not based on the retail price for
electricity; rather on the amount of energy consumed. Commissions are based on the energy usage
transacted between the energy supplier and energy consumer multiplied by our contractual commission
rate. Our contractual commission rate is negotiated with the energy consumer on a
procurement-by-procurement basis based on energy consumer specific circumstances, including the
size of auction, the effort required to organize and run the respective auction and competitive
factors, among others. Once the contractual commission is agreed to with the energy consumer, all
energy suppliers participating in the auction agree to that rate. That commission rate remains
fixed for the duration of the contractual term regardless of energy usage. Energy consumers provide
us with a letter of authorization to request their usage history from the local utility. We then
use this data to compile a usage profile for that energy consumer that will become the basis for
the auction. This data may also be used to estimate revenue on a going forward basis, as noted
below.
Historically, our revenue and operating results have varied from quarter-to-quarter and are
expected to continue to fluctuate in the future. These fluctuations are primarily due to energy
usage, particularly electricity, having higher demand in our second and third quarters and lower
demand during our fourth and first quarters. In addition, the activity levels on the World Energy
Exchange can fluctuate due to a number of factors, including market prices, weather conditions,
energy consumers credit ratings, the ability of suppliers to obtain financing in credit markets,
and economic and geopolitical events. To the extent these factors affect the purchasing decisions
of energy consumers our future results of operations may be affected.
Contracts between energy suppliers and energy consumers are signed for a variety of term
lengths, with a one year contract term being typical for commercial and industrial energy
consumers, and government contracts typically having two to three year terms. As a result of recent
commodity price fluctuations, where prices increased sharply in the first half of 2008 and then
fell dramatically in the second half of 2008 and into 2009, we have seen our customers take
advantage of what they perceive as low prices and contract for multiple year terms. During this
period we saw customers in some cases contract for four, five and even six year terms. Our revenue
has grown over the last three years through new participants utilizing our World Energy Exchange as
well as energy consumers increasing the size or frequency of their transactions on our exchange
platform.
We do not invoice our energy suppliers for monthly commissions earned and, therefore, we
report a substantial portion of our receivables as unbilled. Unbilled accounts receivable
represents managements best estimate of energy provided by the energy suppliers to the energy
consumers for a specific completed time period at contracted commission rates and is made up of two
components. The first component represents energy usage for which we have received actual data from
the supplier and/or the utility, but for which payment has not been received at the balance sheet
date. The majority of our contractual relationships with energy suppliers require them to supply
actual usage data to us on a monthly basis and remit payment to us based on that usage. The second
component represents energy usage for which we have not received actual data, but for which we have
estimated
usage. Commissions paid in advance by certain energy suppliers are recorded as deferred
revenue and amortized to commission revenue on a monthly basis on the energy exchanged that month.
22
Table of Contents
Retail Natural Gas Transactions
There are two primary fee components to our retail natural gas services transaction fees and
management fees. Transaction fees are billed to and paid by the energy supplier awarded business
on the platform. These fees are established prior to award and are the same for each supplier. For
the majority of our natural gas transactions, we bill the supplier upon the conclusion of the
transaction based on the estimated energy volume transacted for the entire award term multiplied by
the transaction fee. As with electricity transactions described above, the favorable pricing
environment saw certain gas customers also purchase for multiple year terms. Management fees are
paid by our energy consumers and are generally billed on a monthly basis for services rendered
based on terms and conditions included in contractual arrangements. While substantially all of our
retail natural gas transactions are accounted for in accordance with this policy, a certain
percentage is accounted for as the natural gas is consumed by the customer and recognized as
revenue in accordance with the retail electricity transaction revenue recognition methodology
described above.
Wholesale Transactions
Wholesale transaction fees are invoiced upon the conclusion of the auction based on a fixed
fee. These revenues are not tied to future energy usage and are recognized upon the completion of
the online auction. For reverse auctions where our customers bid for a consumers business, the
fees are paid by the bidder. For forward auctions where a lister is selling energy, the fees are
typically paid by the lister. While substantially all wholesale transactions are accounted for in
this fashion, a small percentage of our wholesale revenue is accounted for as electricity or gas is
delivered similar to the retail electricity transaction methodology described above.
Environmental Commodity Transactions
Environmental commodity transaction fees are accounted for utilizing two primary methods. For
regulated allowance programs like RGGI, fees are paid by the lister and are recognized as revenue
quarterly as auctions are completed and approved. For all other environmental commodity
transactions both the lister and the bidder pay the transaction fee and revenue is recognized upon
the consummation of the underlying transaction as credits are delivered by the lister and payment
is made by the bidder.
Cost of revenue
Cost of revenue consists primarily of:
| salaries, employee benefits and stock-based compensation associated with our auction
management services, which are directly related to the development and production of the
online auction and maintenance of market-related data on our auction platform and monthly
management fees (our supply desk function); |
| amortization of capitalized costs associated with our auction platform and acquired
developed technology; and |
| rent, depreciation and other related overhead and facility-related costs. |
Sales and marketing
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of:
| salaries, employee benefits and stock-based compensation related to sales and marketing
personnel; |
| third party commission expenses to our channel partners; |
| travel and related expenses; |
| amortization related to customer relationships and contracts; |
| rent, depreciation and other related overhead and facility-related costs; and |
| general marketing costs such as trade shows, marketing materials and outsourced services. |
23
Table of Contents
General and administrative
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of:
| salaries, employee benefits and stock-based compensation related to general and
administrative personnel; |
| accounting, legal, and other professional fees; and |
| rent, depreciation and other related overhead and facility-related costs. |
Interest income (expense), net
Interest income (expense), net consists primarily of:
| interest income earned on cash held in the bank; and |
| interest expense related to capital leases. |
Income tax expense
We did not record an income tax benefit for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 as we
provided a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets due to uncertainty regarding
the realization of those deferred tax assets, primarily net operating loss carryforwards, in the
future.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain items as a percent of revenue for the periods
presented:
For the Years Ended | ||||||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Revenue |
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
Cost of revenue |
25 | 37 | 31 | |||||||||
Gross profit |
75 | 63 | 69 | |||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
67 | 81 | 94 | |||||||||
General and administrative |
24 | 38 | 64 | |||||||||
Operating loss |
(16 | ) | (56 | ) | (89 | ) | ||||||
Interest income (expense) |
| | 7 | |||||||||
Income tax expense |
| | (12 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss |
(16 | )% | (56 | )% | (94 | )% | ||||||
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
Revenue
For the Years Ended | ||||||||||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | Increase | ||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 14,618,275 | $ | 12,444,692 | $ | 2,173,583 | 17 | % |
Revenue increased 17% due to increased auction activity in all of our product lines. The
retail product line increase reflects new customer wins with a concentration in the Ohio
electricity market as price caps expired during the year opening up the territory to competitive
supply. Revenue from our wholesale product line increased over 50% as we grew our customer base 38%
to 54 at December 31, 2009 and both new and existing customers became revenue contributors. Our
environmental commodities product line nearly doubled reflecting a full year of RGGI auctions in
2009. Partially offsetting the retail and green product line increases was a 15% decrease in
management fee revenue resulting from the transitioning of the former EnergyGateway customer base
to a performance-based, transaction fee model.
Cost of revenue
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | % of Revenue | $ | % of Revenue | Decrease | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue |
$ | 3,709,957 | 25 | % | $ | 4,552,215 | 37 | % | $ | (842,258 | ) | (19 | %) |
The 19% decrease in cost of revenue related to the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to
the same period in 2008 was substantially due to decreases in employee costs and, to a lesser
extent, travel costs. At December 31, 2009, we had 21 supply desk employees versus 25 in the same
period last year as we realized operating efficiencies from the integration of the
EnergyGateway operation and aligned our cost structure as business and economic conditions
evolved. Cost of revenue as a percent of revenue decreased 12% due to the cost decreases noted
above and the 17% increase in revenue.
24
Table of Contents
Operating expenses
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | % of Revenue | $ | % of Revenue | Decrease | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
$ | 9,714,900 | 67 | % | $ | 10,057,361 | 81 | % | $ | (342,461 | ) | (3 | %) | |||||||||||
General and administrative |
3,520,886 | 24 | 4,669,807 | 38 | (1,148,921 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
$ | 13,235,786 | 91 | % | $ | 14,727,168 | 119 | % | $ | (1,491,382 | ) | (10 | %) | |||||||||||
The 3% decrease in sales and marketing expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 as
compared to the same period in 2008 primarily reflects general
decreases in compensation, promotional and travel costs substantially offset by increases in third party commission costs.
Compensation and travel decreased primarily due to the operating efficiencies created by the
integration of the EnergyGateway operation and adjustments to our organizational structure as we
realigned our staffing as business and economic conditions evolved in the latter half of 2008.
Promotional costs decreased as a result of transferring certain functions in-house. Third party
commission costs increased 12% substantially due to the 17% increase in revenue. Sales and
marketing expense as a percentage of revenue decreased 14% primarily due to the 17% increase in
revenue and, to a lesser extent, the cost decreases noted above.
The 25% decrease in general and administrative expenses related to the year ended December 31,
2009 as compared to the same period in 2008 was primarily due to decreases in compliance and legal
costs, a gain related to a settlement from early termination of a
customer contract in 2007 and, to a lesser extent, a decrease in
software expense. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in consulting costs. General
and administrative expenses as a percent of revenue decreased 14% due to the cost decreases noted
above and the 17% increase in revenue.
Interest income (expense), net
Interest expense was approximately $7,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and $6,000 for
the year ended December 31, 2008. Interest income was approximately $1,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and $45,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in interest
income was primarily due to a lower average cash balance in 2009 as compared to 2008, as we
utilized the proceeds from our initial public offering to pursue our strategic initiatives.
Income tax expense
We did not record an income tax benefit for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 as we
provided a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets due to uncertainty regarding
the realization of those deferred tax assets, primarily net operating loss carryforwards, in the
future.
Net loss
We reported a net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 of approximately $2.3 million as
compared to a net loss of approximately $6.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The 66%
decrease in net loss is primarily due to decreased operating expenses and the 17% increase in
revenue.
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
Revenue
For the Years Ended | ||||||||||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | Increase | ||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 12,444,692 | $ | 9,188,265 | $ | 3,256,427 | 35 | % |
Revenue increased 35% primarily due to increased auction activity in all of our product lines,
new customer wins and the inclusion of the EnergyGateway operation for a full twelve months during
the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to seven months during the year ended December 31,
2007. The revenue increase reflects increased activity in our retail business including the large
state government procurements run during 2007, record bookings generated by our retail sales force
and an increase to 59 channel partners as of December 31, 2008 from 42 as of December 31, 2007. Of
those channel partners, 35 had contributed to our revenue by brokering transactions over the
exchange during 2008 as compared to 25 during 2007. In addition, our wholesale customer base grew
to 39 in 2008 from 12 in 2007 and 2008 reflected our success in the environmental commodities
product line including the successful completion of the first two quarterly auctions for RGGI.
25
Table of Contents
Cost of revenue
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | % of Revenue | $ | % of Revenue | Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue |
$ | 4,552,215 | 37 | % | $ | 2,874,678 | 31 | % | $ | 1,677,537 | 58 | % |
The 58% increase in cost of revenue related to the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to
the same period in 2007 was substantially due to an increase in salary and benefit costs primarily
from the inclusion of the former EnergyGateway employees for a full twelve months during the year
ended December 31, 2008 as compared to seven months during the year ended December 31, 2007 and, to
a lesser extent, increased travel costs and amortization related to developed technology and
intangible assets acquired. Cost of revenue as a percent of revenue increased 6% due to the cost
increases noted above partially offset by the 35% increase in revenue.
Operating expenses
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | % of Revenue | $ | % of Revenue | Increase / (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
$ | 10,057,361 | 81 | % | $ | 8,598,256 | 94 | % | $ | 1,459,105 | 17 | % | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
4,669,807 | 38 | 5,858,810 | 64 | (1,189,003 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
$ | 14,727,168 | 119 | % | $ | 14,457,066 | 158 | % | $ | 270,102 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||
The 17% increase in sales and marketing expense for the year ended December 31, 2008 as
compared to the same period in 2007 primarily reflects general salary increases and the inclusion
of the former EnergyGateway employees for a full twelve months during the year ended December 31,
2008 as compared to seven months during the year ended December 31, 2007. In addition, the
increased costs include amortization related to customer relationships and contracts, partially
offset by decreases in consulting and marketing expenses. Sales and marketing expense as a
percentage of revenue decreased 13% due to the 35% increase in revenue, partially offset by the
cost increases noted above.
The 20% decrease in general and administrative expenses related to the year ended December 31,
2008 as compared to the same period in 2007 was primarily due to decreases in compliance related
costs, and, to a lesser extent, recruiting costs. General and administrative expenses as a percent
of revenue decreased 26% substantially due to the 35% increase in revenue and the cost decreases
noted above.
Interest income (expense), net
Interest income, net was approximately $40,000 and $563,000 for the years ended December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in interest income was primarily due to a lower average
cash balance in 2008 as compared to 2007, as we utilized the proceeds from our initial public
offering to pursue our strategic initiatives.
Income tax expense
We did not record an income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2008 as we provided a
full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets due to uncertainty regarding the
realization of those deferred tax assets, primarily net operating loss carryforwards, in the
future. Income tax expense of approximately $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007
resulted from the application of a full valuation allowance provided against deferred tax assets
generated in prior years.
Net loss
We reported a net loss for the year ended December 31, 2008 of approximately $6.8 million as
compared to a net loss of approximately $8.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The
decrease in net loss is primarily due to an increase in revenue and decrease in income tax expense,
partially offset by a decrease in interest income and, to a lesser extent, increased operating
expenses.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At December 31, 2009, we had no commitments for material capital expenditures. We have
identified and executed against a number of strategic initiatives that we believe are key
components of our future growth, including: expanding our community of listers, bidders and
channel partners on our exchanges; strengthening and extending our long-term relationships with
government agencies; entering into other energy-related markets including wholesale transactions
with utilities and the emerging environmental commodities markets; making strategic acquisitions and
growing our sales force. As of December 31, 2009, our workforce numbered 54 reflecting a net
decrease of one from the 55 we employed at December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2009, we had 23
professionals in our sales and marketing and account management groups, 21 in our supply desk group
and 10 in our general and administrative group. While we will continue to adjust our workforce as
the need and/or opportunity arises, we believe that our
operating costs will remain at current levels in the short-term.
26
Table of Contents
Comparison of December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2008
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | Increase/(Decrease) | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 2,046,909 | $ | 1,731,411 | $ | 315,498 | 18 | % | ||||||||
Trade accounts receivable |
2,909,024 | 2,343,593 | 565,431 | 24 | ||||||||||||
Days sales outstanding |
76 | 62 | 14 | 23 | ||||||||||||
Working capital |
1,548,986 | 742,478 | 806,508 | 109 | ||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
10,258,142 | 11,009,131 | (750,989 | ) | (7 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents increased 18%, primarily due to approximately $935,000 in net
proceeds from the sale of common stock in the fourth quarter of 2009 and an increase in accrued
compensation. These increases were partially offset by an increase in trade accounts receivable,
costs incurred in software development and purchases of treasury stock. Net loss of $2.3 million
was substantially offset by non-cash expense items including depreciation, amortization and
share-based compensation of $2.3 million. Trade accounts receivable increased 24% due to the 17%
increase in revenue and as a result of days sales outstanding increasing 23%. Days sales
outstanding (representing accounts receivable outstanding at December 31, 2009 divided by the
average sales per day during the current quarter) increased 23% due to the timing of revenue
recognized within the fourth quarter of 2009 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2008. Revenue
from bidders representing greater than 10% of our revenue decreased to 15% from one bidder during
the year ended December 31, 2009, from 22% from the same bidder during the same period in 2008.
Working capital (consisting of current assets less current liabilities) increased 109%,
primarily due to an approximately $0.6 million increase in trade accounts receivable and a $0.3
million increase in cash and cash equivalents discussed above. Stockholders equity decreased 7%
primarily due to the $2.3 million net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009, substantially
offset by net proceeds of $0.9 million from the sale of common stock and share-based compensation
of $0.6 million.
Cash used in operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was
approximately $0.4 million and $4.7 million, respectively, due primarily to the pre-tax losses in
each respective period, partially offset by depreciation and amortization, share-based
compensation, and increases in trade accounts receivable. Cash provided by investing and financing
activities for the year ended December 31, 2009 was approximately $0.7 million, primarily due to
approximately $0.9 million in net proceeds from the sale of common stock, partially offset by
repurchases of our common stock in connection with the vesting of restricted stock granted to
employees and costs incurred in software development. Cash used in investing and financing
activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 was approximately $0.5 million due primarily to
costs incurred in software development.
To date we have not experienced any significant liquidity effects from the current economic
crisis. Energy suppliers are active participants in the financial markets and have been able to
obtain financing when required. Our energy supplier base has been consolidating over the last
several years. We have had several energy consumers file for bankruptcy and liquidate operations as
a result of the current economic environment but the effect on our operations has not been
significant to date. During the last six months of 2009, however, we noted an approximate 4.5%
decline in U.S. electricity usage, which resulted in a 2.4% reduction in expected revenue. While we
believe that electricity usage will return to long-term historical trends, we do expect that energy
demand will continue to be affected in the near term as companies cut back production, close plants
and delay or reduce purchasing decisions.
We have incurred approximately $22.0 million of cumulative operating losses to date. For the
year ended December 31, 2009, we incurred a net loss of approximately $2.3 million and net cash
used in operating activities was approximately $0.4 million. On September 30, 2009, we entered into
a First Loan Modification Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) extending the availability of
our $3,000,000 Credit Facility through March 7, 2011. No advances have been taken under the
facility and we have no bank debt as of December 31, 2009. Cash and cash equivalents were
approximately $2.0 million as of December 31, 2009 representing an increase of approximately $1.4
million during the three months ended December 31, 2009. The $1.4 million increase in cash and cash
equivalents was primarily due to cash flow from operations of $0.5 million and $0.9 million from
the sale of common stock. The $0.5 million from cash provided by operating activities was
attributable to $0.3 million from operating activities as non-cash expense items exceeded the net
loss for the fourth quarter and $0.2 million from changes in operating assets and liabilities. We
expect to continue to fund our operations from existing cash resources, operating cash flow and,
when required, the issuance of various debt and equity instruments. Management believes that the
Companys current financial resources are adequate to fund its ongoing operations in the near term
and pursue its strategic initiatives.
27
Table of Contents
Comparison of December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2007
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | Increase/(Decrease) | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1,731,411 | $ | 7,001,884 | $ | (5,270,473 | ) | (75 | %) | |||||||
Trade accounts receivable |
2,343,593 | 1,878,233 | 465,360 | 25 | ||||||||||||
Days sales outstanding |
62 | 56 | 6 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Working capital |
742,478 | 5,323,622 | (4,581,144 | ) | (86 | ) | ||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
11,009,131 | 16,859,799 | (5,850,668 | ) | (35 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents decreased 75%, primarily due to the pre-tax loss for the year ended
December 31, 2008, an increase in trade accounts receivable, decreases in accounts payable and
accrued expenses and costs incurred in software development all partially offset by an increase in
deferred revenue. Trade accounts receivable increased 25% primarily due to an increase in revenue
and in days sales outstanding within our accounts receivable balance. Days sales outstanding
(representing account receivable outstanding at December 31, 2008 divided by the average sales per
day during the most recent quarter, adjusted for deferred revenue of approximately $116,000)
increased 11% due to a higher concentration of retail energy sales as compared to wholesale energy
sales during the three months ended December 31, 2008 versus the same period in the prior year.
Wholesale revenue was 20% of fourth quarter revenue in 2007 versus only 10% in 2008. Revenue from
our energy suppliers representing greater than 10% of our revenue decreased to 22% from one energy
supplier during the year ended December 31, 2008 from 32% from two energy suppliers for the same
period in 2007. This decrease was directly related to the addition of the EnergyGateway customers
and an increase in wholesale transactions.
Working capital (consisting of current assets less current liabilities) decreased 86%,
primarily due to the decrease in cash and cash equivalents resulting from the funding of the
pre-tax loss for the year ended December 31, 2008 and a $0.5 million increase in deferred revenue
both partially offset by a $0.5 million increase in accounts receivable and a $0.6 million decrease
in accounts payable and accrued expenses. Stockholders equity decreased 35% due to the net loss
for the year, partially offset by share-based compensation and the exercise of stock options and
warrants.
Cash used in operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was
approximately $4.7 million and $4.6 million, respectively, due primarily to the pre-tax losses in
each respective period. Cash used in investing and financing activities for the year ended December
31, 2008 was approximately $547,000 primarily due to costs incurred in software development. Cash
used in investing and financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2007 was approximately
$5.9 million primarily due to the acquisition of EnergyGateway in June 2007.
Contractual Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments
The table below summarizes our gross contractual obligations and other commercial commitments
as of December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2009, we did not have any purchase obligations other
than our capital and operating leases.
Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
2015 and | ||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | 2010 | 2011 and 2012 | 2013 and 2014 | Thereafter | Total | |||||||||||||||
Capital leases |
$ | 17,721 | $ | 16,538 | $ | | $ | | $ | 34,259 | ||||||||||
Operating leases |
316,345 | 185,038 | | | 501,383 | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations |
$ | 334,066 | $ | 201,576 | $ | | $ | | $ | 535,642 | ||||||||||
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue
and expenses during the reporting period.
The most judgmental estimates affecting our consolidated financial statements are those
relating to revenue recognition and the estimate of actual energy purchased from the energy
supplier and end user, or energy consumer, of such energy; software development costs; share-based
compensation; the valuation of intangible assets and goodwill; impairment of long-lived assets; and
estimates of future taxable income as it relates to the realization of our net deferred tax assets.
We regularly evaluate our estimates and assumptions based upon historical experience and various
other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form
the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not
readily apparent from other sources. To the extent actual results differ from those estimates; our
future results of operations may be affected. We believe the following critical accounting policies
affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated
financial statements. Refer to Note 2 of our consolidated financial statements filed herewith for a
description of our accounting policies.
28
Table of Contents
Revenue Recognition
Retail Electricity Transactions
We earn a monthly commission on energy sales contracted through our online auction platform
from each bidder or energy supplier based on the energy usage transacted between the bidder or
energy supplier and lister or energy consumer. Our commissions are not based on the retail price
for electricity; rather on the amount of energy consumed. Commissions are based on the energy usage
transacted between the energy supplier and energy consumer multiplied by our contractual commission
rate. Revenue from commissions is recognized as earned on a monthly basis over the life of each
contract as energy is consumed, provided there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the sales
price is fixed or determinable, collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured, and
customer acceptance criteria, if any, has been successfully demonstrated.
We record brokerage commissions based on actual usage data obtained from the energy supplier
for that accounting period, or to the extent actual usage data is not available, based on the
estimated amount of electricity and gas delivered to the energy consumers for that accounting
period. We develop our estimates on a quarterly basis based on the following criteria:
| Payments received prior to the issuance of the financial statements; |
| Usage updates from energy suppliers; |
| Usage data from utilities; |
| Comparable historical usage data; and |
| Historical variances to previous estimates. |
To the extent usage data cannot be obtained, we estimate revenue as follows:
| Historical usage data obtained from the energy consumer in conjunction with the execution
of the auction; |
| Geographic/utility usage patterns based on actual data received; |
| Analysis of prior year usage patterns; and |
| Specific review of individual energy supplier/location accounts. |
In addition, we analyze this estimated data based on overall industry trends including
prevailing weather and usage data. Once the actual data is received, we adjust the estimated
accounts receivable and revenue to the actual total amount in the period during which the payment
is received. Based on managements current capacity to obtain actual energy usage, we currently
estimate four to six weeks of revenue at the end of our accounting period. Differences between
estimated and actual revenue have been within managements expectations and have not been material
to date.
We do not invoice our electricity energy suppliers for monthly commissions earned and,
therefore, we report a substantial portion of our receivables as unbilled. Unbilled accounts
receivable represents managements best estimate of energy provided by the energy suppliers to the
energy consumers for a specific completed time period at contracted commission rates and is made up
of two components. The first component represents energy usage for which we have received actual
data from the supplier and/or the utility but for which payment has not been received at the
balance sheet date. The majority of our contractual relationships with energy suppliers require
them to supply actual usage data to us on a monthly basis and remit payment to us based on that
usage. The second component represents energy usage for which we have not received actual data, but
for which we have estimated usage. Commissions paid in advance by certain energy suppliers are
recorded as deferred revenue and amortized to commission revenue on a monthly basis on the energy
exchanged that month.
Retail Natural Gas Transactions
There are two primary fee components to our retail natural gas services, transaction fees and
management fees. Transaction fees are billed to and paid by the energy supplier awarded business
on the platform. These fees are established prior to award and are the same for each supplier. For
the majority of our natural gas transactions, we bill the supplier upon the conclusion of the
transaction based on the estimated energy volume transacted for the entire award term multiplied by
the transaction fee. Management fees are paid by our energy consumers and are generally billed on
a monthly basis for services rendered based on terms and conditions included in contractual
arrangements. While substantially all of our retail natural gas transactions are accounted in
accordance with this policy, a certain percentage are accounted for as the natural gas is consumed
by the customer and recognized as revenue in accordance with the retail electricity transaction
revenue recognition methodology described above.
Wholesale Transactions
Wholesale transaction fees are invoiced upon the conclusion of the auction based on a fixed
fee. These revenues are not tied to future energy usage and are recognized upon the completion of
the online auction. For reverse auctions where our customers bid for a consumers business, the
fees are paid by the bidder. For forward auctions where a lister is selling energy, the fees are
typically paid by the lister. While substantially all wholesale transactions are accounted for in
this fashion, a small percentage of our wholesale revenue is accounted for as electricity or gas is
delivered similar to the retail electricity transaction methodology described above.
29
Table of Contents
Environmental Commodity Transactions
Environmental commodity transaction fees are accounted for utilizing two primary methods. For
regulated allowance programs like RGGI, fees are paid by the lister and are recognized as revenue
quarterly as auctions are completed and approved. For all other environmental commodity
transactions both the lister and the bidder pay the transaction fee and revenue is recognized upon
the consummation of the underlying transaction as credits are delivered by the lister and payment
is made by the bidder.
Channel Partner Commissions
We pay commissions to our channel partners at contractual rates based on monthly energy
transactions between energy suppliers and energy consumers. The commission is accrued monthly and
charged to sales and marketing expense as revenue is recognized. We pay commissions to our
salespeople at contractual commission rates based upon cash collections from our customers.
Revenue Estimation
Our estimates in relation to revenue recognition affect revenue and sales and marketing
expense as reflected on our statements of operations, and trade accounts receivable and accrued
commissions accounts as reflected on our balance sheets. For any quarterly reporting period, we may
not have actual usage data for certain energy suppliers and will need to estimate revenue. We
record revenue based on the energy consumers historical usage profile. At the end of each
reporting period, we adjust historical revenue to reflect actual usage for the period and estimate
usage where actual usage is not available. For the year ended December 31, 2009, we estimated usage
for approximately 8% of our revenue resulting in a negative 0.6%, or approximately a $93,000
adjustment to reduce revenue. This decrease in revenue resulted in an approximate $30,000 decrease
in sales and marketing expense related to third party commission expense associated with those
revenues. Corresponding adjustments were made to trade accounts receivable and accrued commissions,
respectively. A 1% difference between this estimate and actual usage would have an approximate
$12,000 effect on our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts when estimating losses resulting from the
inability of our bidders and listers to pay amounts due us. A considerable amount of judgment is
required in assessing the realization of receivables and estimates for collectability. These
estimates are based on factors such as past experience in collecting receivables, information about
the ability of individual bidders and listers to pay, current economic conditions and the aging of
accounts receivable, if necessary.
Software Development
Certain acquired software and significant enhancements to our software are capitalized in
accordance with guidance from the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). Accordingly,
internally developed software costs of approximately $82,000, $403,000 and $469,000 related to
implementation, coding and configuration have been capitalized in 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. We amortize internally developed and purchased software over the estimated useful
life of the software (generally three years). During 2009, 2008 and 2007, approximately $310,000,
$239,000 and $111,000 were amortized to cost of revenues, respectively. Accumulated amortization
was approximately $822,000 and $512,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Our estimates for capitalization of software development costs affect cost of revenue and
capitalized software as reflected on our consolidated statements of operations and on our
consolidated balance sheets. During the year ended December 31, 2009, capitalized software costs
were 0.6% of our total assets and amortization expense was approximately 8.4% of cost of revenue.
To the extent the carrying amount of the capitalized software costs may not be fully recoverable or
that the useful lives of those assets are no longer appropriate, we may need to record an
impairment (non-cash) charge and write-off a portion or all of the capitalized software balance on
the balance sheet.
Goodwill
We use assumptions in establishing the carrying value and fair value of our goodwill.
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets
of acquired businesses. We account for goodwill that results from acquired businesses in
accordance with guidance of the FASB, under which goodwill and intangible assets having indefinite
lives are not amortized but instead are assigned to reporting units and tested for impairment
annually or more frequently if changes in circumstances or the occurrence of events indicate
possible impairment.
We perform an annual impairment review during the fourth fiscal quarter of each year, or
earlier, if indicators of potential impairment exist. The impairment test for goodwill is a
two-step process. Step one consists of a comparison of the fair value of a reporting unit with its
carrying amount, including the goodwill allocated to each reporting unit. If the carrying amount
is in excess of the fair value, step two requires the comparison of the implied fair value of the
reporting unit whereby the carrying amount of the reporting units goodwill over the implied fair
value of the reporting units goodwill will be recorded as an impairment loss.
We performed our annual impairment analysis in December 2009 and determined that no impairment
of our goodwill or intangible assets existed.
30
Table of Contents
Intangible Assets
We use assumptions in establishing the carrying value, fair value and estimated lives of our
intangible assets. The criteria used for these assumptions include managements estimate of the
assets continuing ability to generate positive income from operations and positive cash flow in
future periods compared to the carrying value of the asset, as well as the strategic significance
of any identifiable intangible asset in our business objectives. If assets are considered
impaired, the impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds
the fair value of the assets. Useful lives and related amortization expense are based on our
estimate of the period that the assets will generate revenues or otherwise be used by us. Factors
that would influence the likelihood of a material change in our reported results include
significant changes in the assets ability to generate positive cash flow, a significant decline in
the economic and competitive environment on which the asset depends and significant changes in our
strategic business objectives.
Intangible assets consist of customer relationships and contracts, purchased technology and
other intangibles, and are stated at cost less accumulated amortization. Intangible assets with a
definite life are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which
range from one to ten years.
Impairment of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets
In accordance with guidance from the FASB, we periodically review long-lived assets and
intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable or that the useful lives of those assets are
no longer appropriate. Recoverability of these assets is determined by comparing the forecasted
undiscounted net cash flows of the operation to which the assets relate to the carrying amount.
During 2009, no impairment test was performed of our long-lived assets as there was no change in
circumstances that indicated that the carrying value of the assets was not recoverable.
Income Taxes
In accordance with guidance from the FASB, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined
at the end of each period based on the future tax consequences that can be attributed to net
operating loss carryforwards, as well as differences between the financial statement carrying
amounts of the existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred income tax
expense or credits are based on changes in the asset or liability from period to period. Valuation
allowances are provided if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not
that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The realization of deferred tax
assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income. In determining the valuation
allowance, we consider past performance, expected future taxable income, and qualitative factors
which we consider to be appropriate in estimating future taxable income. Our forecast of expected
future taxable income is for future periods that can be reasonably estimated. Results that differ
materially from current expectations may cause us to change its judgment on future taxable income
and adjust our existing tax valuation allowance.
Our estimates in relation to income taxes affect income tax benefit and deferred tax assets as
reflected on our statements of operations and balance sheets, respectively. The deferred tax assets
are reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that the tax benefits will not
be realized in the near term. As of December 31, 2009, we had net deferred tax assets of
approximately $7.9 million against which a full valuation allowance has been established. To the
extent we determine that it is more likely than not that we will recover all of our deferred tax
assets, it could result in an approximate $7.9 million non-cash tax benefit.
Share-Based Compensation
In accordance with guidance from the FASB, we recognize the compensation cost of share-based
awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. From 2007 through
2009, share-based awards consisted of grants of restricted stock and stock options. The
restrictions on the restricted stock lapse over the vesting period. The vesting period of
restricted stock is determined by our board of directors, and is generally four years for
employees.
31
Table of Contents
The per-share weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $2.68, $1.21 and $5.78, respectively, on the date of grant,
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions and
estimated forfeiture rates of 11%, 15% and 13% in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively:
Expected | Risk | Expected | Expected | |||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, | Dividend Yield | Interest Rate | Option Life | Volatility | ||||||||||||
2009 |
| 2.28 | % | 4.75 years | 113 | % | ||||||||||
2008 |
| 1.67 | % | 4.75 years | 87 | % | ||||||||||
2007 |
| 4.66 | % | 4.61 years | 54 | % |
We have two stock incentive plans: the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, or the 2003 Plan, and the
2006 Stock Incentive Plan, or the 2006 Plan. There was a total of 1,003,503 shares of common
stock reserved for issuance under these plans at December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2009,
304,731 shares of common stock were reserved under the 2003 Plan. No further grants are allowed
under the 2003 Plan. In addition, 698,772 shares of common stock were reserved under the 2006 Plan
at December 31, 2009 representing 355,157 outstanding stock options, 34,301 shares of restricted
stock outstanding and 309,314 shares available for grant.
A summary of stock option activity under both plans for the year ended December 31, 2009, is
as follows:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Shares | Exercise Price | |||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
626,456 | $ | 5.08 | |||||
Granted |
242,700 | $ | 3.47 | |||||
Canceled |
(156,248 | ) | $ | 9.85 | ||||
Exercised |
(53,020 | ) | $ | 0.55 | ||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
659,888 | $ | 3.73 | |||||
A summary of common stock options outstanding and common stock options exercisable as of
December 31, 2009 is as follows:
Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining | Aggregate | Number | Remaining | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||||||||
Range of | Contractual | Intrinsic | of Shares | Contractual | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||||||||
Exercise Prices | Options | Life | Value | Exercisable | Life | Value | ||||||||||||||||||
$0.20 $1.99 |
162,530 | 0.86 years | $ | 433,955 | 162,530 | 0.86 years | $ | 433,955 | ||||||||||||||||
$2.00 $3.80 |
360,480 | 5.85 years | 84,974 | 85,005 | 3.32 years | 34,880 | ||||||||||||||||||
$3.81 $11.29 |
97,001 | 4.27 years | | 59,477 | 3.58 years | | ||||||||||||||||||
$11.30 $13.40 |
39,877 | 4.31 years | | 26,381 | 4.31 years | | ||||||||||||||||||
659,888 | 4.30 years | $ | 518,929 | 333,393 | 2.24 years | $ | 468,835 | |||||||||||||||||
The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2009 was
approximately $161,000. At December 31, 2009, the weighted average exercise price of options
outstanding and exercisable was $3.73 and $3.57, respectively.
Restricted Stock
A summary of restricted stock activity for the year ended December 31, 2009 is as follows:
Weighted Average | ||||||||
Shares | Grant Price | |||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
118,603 | $ | 9.76 | |||||
Granted |
38,559 | $ | 3.45 | |||||
Canceled |
(33,943 | ) | $ | 9.45 | ||||
Vested |
(88,918 | ) | $ | 6.90 | ||||
Unvested at December 31, 2009 |
34,301 | $ | 10.38 | |||||
There were 1,003,503 shares reserved for issuance under these plans at December 31, 2009.
32
Table of Contents
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) Topic 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, as the single source of
authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP. FASB ASC Topic 105 does not change current U.S. GAAP, but
is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all
authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. All existing accounting
standard documents will be superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the FASB
Codification will be considered non-authoritative. These provisions of FASB ASC Topic 105 are
effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009 and, accordingly, are
effective for the Company for the current fiscal reporting period. The adoption of this
pronouncement did not have an impact on our financial condition or results of operations, but will
impact our financial reporting process by eliminating all references to pre-codification standards.
On its effective date, the ASC superseded all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting
standards, and all other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the ASC
became non-authoritative.
In December 2007, the FASB issued revised authoritative guidance that requires an acquiring
entity in a business combination to recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement
objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; and requires the acquirer to disclose to
investors and other users all of the information they need to evaluate and understand the nature
and financial effect of the business combination. This guidance is set forth in Topic 805 in the
ASC (ASC 805), and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption
of ASC 805 on January 1, 2009 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In March 2008, the FASB amended U.S. GAAP with respect to derivative instruments and hedging
activities. This guidance is set forth in Topic 815-10 in the ASC (ASC 815-10). ASC 815-10 is
intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by
requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an
entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. Entities are required to
provide enhanced disclosures about: (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; (b) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for; and (c) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance,
and cash flows. ASC 815-10 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and
interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of ASC 815-10 on January 1, 2009
did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance set forth in Topic 820 in the ASC (ASC 820), to
require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial statements. Our
financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and
accrued expenses. At December 31, 2009 and 2008 the carrying value of the Companys financial
instruments approximated fair value, due to their short-term nature.
In May 2009, the FASB issued guidance set forth in Topic 855 in the ASC (ASC 855), which
requires an entity to recognize in the financial statements the effects of all subsequent events
that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet.
For nonrecognized subsequent events that must be disclosed to keep the financial statements from
being misleading, an entity will be required to disclose the nature of the event as well as an
estimate of its financial effect, or a statement that an estimate cannot be made. We have evaluated
subsequent events through the issuance of our consolidated financial statements.
Seasonality
Our revenue is subject to seasonality and fluctuations during the year primarily as a result
of weather conditions and its impact on the demand for energy. Our revenue is generated from the
commissions we receive under any given energy contract, which is tied to the energy consumers
consumption of energy. Therefore, revenue from natural gas consumption tends to be strongest during
the winter months due to the increase in heating usage, and revenue from electricity consumption
tends to be strongest during the summer months due to the increase in air conditioning usage. Our
revenue is also subject to fluctuations within any given season, depending on the severity of
weather conditions during a particularly cold winter or an unseasonably warm summer, energy
consumption will rise.
Cyclicality
We believe that our business will continue to be cyclical in nature and is tied, in part, to
market energy prices which impact transaction volume. When energy prices increase in competitive
markets above the price levels of the regulated utilities, energy consumers are less likely to
lock-in to higher fixed price contracts in the competitive markets and so they are less likely to
use our auction platform. Conversely, when energy prices decrease in competitive markets below the
price levels of the regulated utilities, energy consumers are more likely to lock-in to lower fixed
price contracts in the competitive markets and so they are more likely to use our auction platform.
Although our short term revenue is impacted by usage trends, these cyclical effects will also have
longer term implications on our business because we derive future revenue from current auctions.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market Risk
Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices,
such as foreign currency rates, interest rates, and other relevant market rates or price changes.
In the ordinary course of business, we are exposed to market risk resulting from changes in
foreign currency exchange rates, and we regularly evaluate our exposure to such changes. Our
overall
risk management strategy seeks to balance the magnitude of the exposure and the costs and
availability of appropriate financial instruments.
33
Table of Contents
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
Historically, our business has not been materially impacted by inflation. We provide our
service at the inception of the service contract between the bidder and lister. Our fee for retail
energy auction services is set as a fixed dollar amount per unit of measure and fluctuates with
changes in energy demand over the contract period.
Foreign Currency Fluctuation
Our commission revenue is primarily denominated in U.S. dollars. Therefore, we are not
directly affected by foreign exchange fluctuations on our current orders. However, fluctuations
in foreign exchange rates do have an effect on listers access to U.S. dollars and on pricing
competition. We have entered into non-U.S. dollar contracts but they have not had a material
impact on our operations. We do not believe that foreign exchange fluctuations will materially
affect our results of operations in the near term.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The consolidated financial statements listed in Item 15(a) are incorporated herein by
reference and are filed as a part of this report and follow the signature pages to this Annual
Report on Form 10-K on page 37.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Not applicable.
Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act), the Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the
participation of the Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of
December 31, 2009. In designing and evaluating the Companys disclosure controls and procedures,
the Company and its management recognize that there are inherent limitations to the effectiveness
of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and
the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective
disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their desired
control objectives. Additionally, in evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures,
the Companys management was required to apply its reasonable judgment. Based upon the required
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of
December 31, 2009, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the
reasonable assurance level to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in
the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported, and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it
files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to its management,
including the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate, to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
a) Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting for the Company, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange
Act. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or
that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Our management
assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2009. In making this assessment, the Companys management used the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework.
Based on this assessment, our management concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, our internal
control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
34
Table of Contents
b) Attestation Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Companys registered public
accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not
subject to attestation by the Companys registered public accounting firm, pursuant to temporary
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only managements report
in this annual report.
c) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the
three-months ended December 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate
Governance
The information required to be disclosed by this item 10 is hereby incorporated by reference
to the Companys definitive proxy statement to be filed by the Company within 120 days of the close
of its fiscal year.
We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics applicable to all of our directors,
officers and employees, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer. The
code of business conduct and ethics is available on the corporate governance section of Investor
Relations of our website www.worldenergy.com.
Any waiver of the code of business conduct and ethics for directors or executive officers, or
any amendment to the code that applies to directors or executive officers, may only be made by the
board of directors. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05(c) of Form 8-K
regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of this code of ethics by posting such
information on our website, at the address and location specified above. To date, no such waivers
have been requested or granted.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required to be disclosed by this item 11 is hereby incorporated by reference
to the Companys definitive proxy statement to be filed by the Company within 120 days after the
close of its fiscal year.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
The information required to be disclosed by this item 12 is hereby incorporated by reference
to the Companys definitive proxy statement to be filed by the Company within 120 days after the
close of its fiscal year.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required to be disclosed by this item 13 is hereby incorporated by reference
to the Companys definitive proxy statement to be filed by the Company within 120 days after the
close of its fiscal year.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required to be disclosed by this item 14 is hereby incorporated by
reference to the Companys definitive proxy statement to be filed by the Company within 120 days
after the close of its fiscal year.
35
Table of Contents
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)(1) Financial Statements
For a list of the financial information included herein, see Index to Consolidated Financial
Statements on page 38 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(a)(2) Financial Statements Schedules
All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is
included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
(a)(3) Exhibits
The list of exhibits filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is set forth on the
Exhibit Index immediately preceding the exhibits hereto and is incorporated herein by reference.
36
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
WORLD ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC. |
||||
By: | /s/ Richard Domaleski | March 4, 2010 | ||
Richard Domaleski | ||||
Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ Richard Domaleski
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director | March 4, 2010 | ||
/s/ James Parslow
|
Chief Financial Officer | March 4, 2010 | ||
/s/ Edward Libbey
|
Chairman of the Board and Director | March 4, 2010 | ||
/s/ Patrick Bischoff
|
Director | March 4, 2010 | ||
/s/ John Wellard
|
Director | March 4, 2010 | ||
/s/ Thad Wolfe
|
Director | March 4, 2010 |
37
Table of Contents
WORLD ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page | ||||
39 | ||||
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: |
||||
40 | ||||
41 | ||||
42 | ||||
43 | ||||
44 |
38
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
World Energy Solutions, Inc.
Worcester, Massachusetts
World Energy Solutions, Inc.
Worcester, Massachusetts
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of World Energy Solutions, Inc.
(the Company) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its
internal control over financial reporting. An audit includes consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of World Energy Solutions, Inc. as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ UHY LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 4, 2010
March 4, 2010
39
Table of Contents
WORLD ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 2,046,909 | $ | 1,731,411 | ||||
Trade accounts receivable, net |
2,909,024 | 2,343,593 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
213,033 | 431,246 | ||||||
Total current assets |
5,168,966 | 4,506,250 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
371,033 | 487,211 | ||||||
Capitalized software, net |
398,884 | 627,275 | ||||||
Intangibles, net |
4,750,497 | 5,949,609 | ||||||
Goodwill |
3,178,701 | 3,178,701 | ||||||
Other assets |
26,044 | 27,594 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 13,894,125 | $ | 14,776,640 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 285,212 | $ | 593,553 | ||||
Accrued commissions |
835,342 | 777,784 | ||||||
Accrued compensation |
1,280,683 | 1,118,168 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
328,816 | 355,511 | ||||||
Deferred revenue and customer advances |
873,752 | 876,271 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations |
16,175 | 42,485 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
3,619,980 | 3,763,772 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion |
16,003 | 3,737 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
3,635,983 | 3,767,509 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued
or outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 15,000,000 shares authorized; 8,889,357
shares issued and 8,850,474 shares outstanding at December 31, 2009, and
8,410,727 shares issued and 8,397,684 shares outstanding at December 31,
2008 |
885 | 840 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
32,431,240 | 30,755,596 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(21,981,951 | ) | (19,648,432 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock, at cost; 38,883 shares at December 31, 2009 and 13,043 shares
at December 31, 2008 |
(192,032 | ) | (98,873 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
10,258,142 | 11,009,131 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 13,894,125 | $ | 14,776,640 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
40
Table of Contents
WORLD ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||
Brokerage commissions and transaction fees |
$ | 13,524,578 | $ | 11,156,215 | $ | 8,401,791 | ||||||
Management fees |
1,093,697 | 1,288,477 | 786,474 | |||||||||
Total revenue |
14,618,275 | 12,444,692 | 9,188,265 | |||||||||
Cost of revenue |
3,709,957 | 4,552,215 | 2,874,678 | |||||||||
Gross profit |
10,908,318 | 7,892,477 | 6,313,587 | |||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
9,714,900 | 10,057,361 | 8,598,256 | |||||||||
General and administrative |
3,520,886 | 4,669,807 | 5,858,810 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses |
13,235,786 | 14,727,168 | 14,457,066 | |||||||||
Operating loss |
(2,327,468 | ) | (6,834,691 | ) | (8,143,479 | ) | ||||||
Interest income (expense): |
||||||||||||
Interest income |
611 | 45,132 | 573,395 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
(6,662 | ) | (5,601 | ) | (10,101 | ) | ||||||
Total interest income (expense), net |
(6,051 | ) | 39,531 | 563,294 | ||||||||
Loss before income taxes |
(2,333,519 | ) | (6,795,160 | ) | (7,580,185 | ) | ||||||
Income tax expense |
| | (1,061,720 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (2,333,519 | ) | $ | (6,795,160 | ) | $ | (8,641,905 | ) | |||
Net loss per common share basic and diluted |
$ | (0.27 | ) | $ | (0.82 | ) | $ | (1.08 | ) | |||
Weighted average shares outstanding basic and diluted |
8,512,060 | 8,310,315 | 7,979,359 | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
41
Table of Contents
WORLD ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
Common Stock | Treasury Stock | Additional | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | $0.0001 | Number of | Stated at | Paid-in | Accumulated | Stockholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Par Value | Shares | Cost | Capital | Deficit | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2006 |
7,651,174 | $ | 765 | | $ | | $ | 22,155,604 | $ | (4,211,367 | ) | $ | 17,945,002 | |||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation |
| | | | 982,190 | | 982,190 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock
in connection with
acquisition of
EnergyGateway |
537,500 | 54 | | | 6,523,178 | | 6,523,232 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock
in connection with
restricted stock grant |
40,000 | 4 | | | (4 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reversal of issuance
costs related to initial
public offering of common
stock |
| | | | 48,468 | | 48,468 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
11,250 | 1 | | | 2,811 | | 2,812 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | (8,641,905 | ) | (8,641,905 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
8,239,924 | 824 | | | 29,712,247 | (12,853,272 | ) | 16,859,799 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation |
| | | | 1,006,560 | | 1,006,560 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock
in connection with
restricted stock grants |
32,564 | 3 | 13,043 | (98,873 | ) | (3 | ) | | (98,873 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock warrants |
67,123 | 7 | | | 20,130 | | 20,137 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
58,073 | 6 | | | 16,662 | | 16,668 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | (6,795,160 | ) | (6,795,160 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
8,397,684 | 840 | 13,043 | (98,873 | ) | 30,755,596 | (19,648,432 | ) | 11,009,131 | |||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation |
| | | | 633,285 | | 633,285 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock
in connection with
restricted stock grants |
63,070 | 6 | 25,840 | (93,159 | ) | 77,707 | | (15,446 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock
in connection with
private placement, net |
336,700 | 34 | | | 935,442 | | 935,476 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
53,020 | 5 | | | 29,210 | | 29,215 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | (2,333,519 | ) | (2,333,519 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
8,850,474 | $ | 885 | 38,883 | $ | (192,032 | ) | $ | 32,431,240 | $ | (21,981,951 | ) | $ | 10,258,142 | ||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
42
Table of Contents
WORLD ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (2,333,519 | ) | $ | (6,795,160 | ) | $ | (8,641,905 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,655,895 | 1,756,068 | 1,028,497 | |||||||||
Deferred taxes |
| | 1,061,720 | |||||||||
Share-based compensation |
633,285 | 1,006,560 | 982,190 | |||||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment |
1,604 | | | |||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of the effects of
acquisition: |
||||||||||||
Trade accounts receivable |
(565,431 | ) | (465,360 | ) | 17,590 | |||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
219,763 | (93,847 | ) | (133,377 | ) | |||||||
Accounts payable |
(308,341 | ) | (386,935 | ) | 80,491 | |||||||
Accrued commissions |
57,558 | 64,865 | (308,514 | ) | ||||||||
Accrued compensation |
240,228 | (398,250 | ) | 1,212,088 | ||||||||
Accrued expenses |
(26,695 | ) | 76,349 | 33,762 | ||||||||
Deferred revenue and customer advances |
(2,519 | ) | 512,338 | 68,525 | ||||||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(428,172 | ) | (4,723,372 | ) | (4,598,933 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Costs incurred in software development |
(82,070 | ) | (402,705 | ) | (469,171 | ) | ||||||
Net cash paid in acquisition of EnergyGateway, net of cash
acquired |
| | (4,904,358 | ) | ||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(1,432 | ) | (40,704 | ) | (456,095 | ) | ||||||
Cash received in sale of property and equipment |
500 | | | |||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(83,002 | ) | (443,409 | ) | (5,829,624 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
29,215 | 16,668 | 2,812 | |||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock warrants |
| 20,137 | | |||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of common stock, net |
935,476 | | | |||||||||
Principal payments on capital lease obligations |
(44,860 | ) | (41,624 | ) | (56,257 | ) | ||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
(93,159 | ) | (98,873 | ) | | |||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
826,672 | (103,692 | ) | (53,445 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
315,498 | (5,270,473 | ) | (10,482,002 | ) | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
1,731,411 | 7,001,884 | 17,483,886 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
$ | 2,046,909 | $ | 1,731,411 | $ | 7,001,884 | ||||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
||||||||||||
Net cash received (paid) for interest |
$ | (5,494 | ) | $ | 45,419 | $ | 612,303 | |||||
Non-cash activities: |
||||||||||||
Fair value of common stock issued in acquisition of EnergyGateway |
$ | | $ | | $ | 6,536,000 | ||||||
Fair value of restricted common stock granted to employees |
$ | 77,713 | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Net capital lease obligations |
$ | 30,816 | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Reversal of accrued expenses related to initial public offering
of common stock |
$ | | $ | | $ | 48,468 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
43
Table of Contents
WORLD ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 NATURE OF BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION
World Energy Solutions, Inc. (World Energy or the Company) is an energy and environmental
commodities brokerage company that has developed two online auction platforms, the World Energy
Exchange and the World Green Exchange. On the World Energy Exchange, retail energy consumers
(commercial, industrial and government) and wholesale energy participants (utilities, electricity
retailers and intermediaries) in the United States (listers) are able to negotiate for the
purchase or sale of electricity and other energy resources from competing energy suppliers
(bidders) which have agreed to participate on the Companys auction platform. Although the
Companys primary source of revenue is from brokering electricity and natural gas, the Company
adapted its World Energy Exchange auction platform to accommodate the brokering of green power in
2003 (i.e., electricity generated by renewable resources), wholesale electricity in 2004 and
certain other energy-related products in 2005. In 2007, the Company created the World Green
Exchange based on the World Energy Exchange technology and business process. On the World Green
Exchange, bidders and listers negotiate for the purchase or sale of environmental commodities such
as Renewable Energy Certificates, Verified Emissions Reductions, Certified Emissions Reductions and
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) allowances.
On November 16, 2006, the Company completed its initial public offering of common stock for
the sale of 2,300,000 shares of common stock (as adjusted for the one-for-ten reverse stock split
described below) resulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $17.5 million (net of
offering costs of approximately $3.6 million).
On June 1, 2007, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of EG Partners, LLC,
formerly known as EnergyGateway LLC (EnergyGateway), for $4,951,758 in cash and 537,500 common
shares of World Energy (as adjusted for the one-for-ten reverse stock split described below) plus
the assumption of certain liabilities. The EnergyGateway operations are included in these
financial statements from June 1, 2007. See Note 11 for further discussion of this acquisition.
On March 27, 2009, the Company filed a previously approved Certificate of Amendment to the
Companys Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Delaware
to (i) effect a reverse stock split of its outstanding common stock at a ratio of one-for-ten; and
(ii) decrease the number of authorized shares of its common stock from 150,000,000 to 15,000,000.
As a result of the reverse stock split, the issued and outstanding shares of common stock were
reduced on a basis of one share for every ten shares outstanding. All of the Companys stock
related information including issued and outstanding common stock, stock options and warrants to
purchase common stock, restricted stock and loss per share for all periods presented have been
restated to reflect the reverse stock split.
On October 30, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with Bond Capital, Ltd. (Bond), a
strategic partner of the Company, for the purchase of up to $2.5 million of the Companys common
stock. Pursuant to the agreement, a purchasing entity, an affiliate of Bond, acquired $1.0 million
of World Energys common stock at $2.97 per share on November 6, 2009. The Company agreed to offer
an additional $1.5 million in Company shares on the same terms to Bond or its designee, with the
price to be determined at the time of investment, through January 15, 2010. Subsequent to December
31, 2009, affiliates of Bond purchased an additional $400,000 of Company common stock at an average
price of $2.63 per share bringing the net amount raised under the financing agreement to $1.3
million.
The Company has incurred approximately $22 million of cumulative operating losses to date. For
the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company incurred a net loss of approximately $2.3 million and
net cash used in operating activities was approximately $0.4 million. On September 30, 2009, the
Company entered into a First Loan Modification Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) extending
the availability of the Companys $3,000,000 Credit Facility through March 7, 2011. No advances
have been taken under the facility and the Company has no bank debt as of December 31, 2009. Cash
and cash equivalents were approximately $2.0 million as of December 31, 2009 representing an
increase of approximately $1.4 million during the three months ended December 31, 2009. The $1.4
million increase in cash and cash equivalents was primarily due to cash flow from operations of
$0.5 million and $0.9 million from the sale of common stock. The $0.5 million from cash provided by
operating activities was attributable to $0.3 million from operating activities as non-cash expense
items exceeded the net loss during the fourth quarter and $0.2 million from changes in operating
assets and liabilities. The Company expects to continue to fund its operations from existing cash
resources, operating cash flow and, when required, the issuance of various debt and equity
instruments. Management believes that the Companys current financial resources are adequate to
fund its ongoing operations in the near term.
44
Table of Contents
NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
The Companys consolidated financial statements include its wholly-owned subsidiary World
Energy Securities Corp. All intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The Companys most judgmental estimates affecting its consolidated financial statements are
those relating to revenue recognition and the estimate of actual energy delivered from the bidder
by the lister of such energy; software development costs; share-based compensation; the valuation
of intangible assets and goodwill; impairment of long-lived assets; and estimates of future taxable
income as it relates to the realization of net deferred tax assets. The Company regularly evaluates
its estimates and assumptions based upon historical experience and various other factors that the
Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. To the extent actual results differ from those estimates, future results of
operations may be affected. The Company believes the following critical accounting policies affect
its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial
statements.
Revenue Recognition
Retail Electricity Transactions
The Company earns a monthly commission on energy sales contracted through its online auction
platform from each bidder or energy supplier based on the energy usage transacted between the
energy supplier and lister or energy consumer. The Companys commissions are not based on the
retail price for electricity; rather on the amount of energy consumed. Commissions are based on the
energy usage transacted between the energy supplier and energy consumer multiplied by the
contractual commission rate. Revenue from commissions is recognized as earned on a monthly basis
over the life of each contract as energy is consumed, provided there is persuasive evidence of an
arrangement, the sales price is fixed or determinable, collection of the related receivable is
reasonably assured, and customer acceptance criteria, if any, has been successfully demonstrated.
The Company records brokerage commissions based on actual usage data obtained from the energy
supplier for that accounting period, or to the extent actual usage data is not available, based on
the estimated amount of electricity and gas delivered to the energy consumers for that accounting
period. The Company develops its estimates on a quarterly basis based on the following criteria:
| Payments received prior to the issuance of the financial statements; |
||
| Usage updates from energy suppliers; |
||
| Usage data from utilities; |
||
| Comparable historical usage data; and |
||
| Historical variances to previous estimates. |
To the extent usage data cannot be obtained, the Company estimates revenue as follows:
| Historical usage data obtained from the energy consumer in conjunction with the execution of
the auction; |
||
| Geographic/utility usage patterns based on actual data received; |
||
| Analysis of prior year usage patterns; and |
||
| Specific review of individual energy supplier/location accounts. |
In addition, the Company analyzes this estimated data based on overall industry trends
including prevailing weather and usage data. Once the actual data is received, the Company adjusts
the estimated accounts receivable and revenue to the actual total amount in the period during which
the payment is received. Based on managements current capacity to obtain actual energy usage, the
Company currently estimates four to six weeks of revenue at the end of its accounting period.
Differences between estimated and actual revenue have been within managements expectations and
have not been material to date.
The Company does not invoice energy suppliers for monthly commissions earned and, therefore,
reports a substantial portion of its receivables as unbilled. Unbilled accounts receivable
represents managements best estimate of energy provided by the energy suppliers to the energy
consumers for a specific completed time period at contracted commission rates and is made up of two
components. The first component represents energy usage for which the Company has received actual
data from the supplier and/or the utility but for which payment has not been received at the
balance sheet date. The majority of the Companys contractual relationships with energy suppliers
require them to supply actual usage data to the Company on a monthly basis and remit payment to the
Company based on that usage. The second component represents energy usage for which the Company has
not received actual data, but for which it has estimated usage. Commissions paid in advance by
certain energy suppliers are recorded as deferred revenue and amortized to commission revenue on a
monthly basis on the energy exchanged that month.
45
Table of Contents
Retail Natural Gas Transactions
There are two primary fee components to the Companys retail natural gas services, transaction
fees and management fees. Transaction fees are billed to and paid by the energy supplier awarded
business on the platform. Transaction fees for natural gas awards are established prior to award
and are the same for each supplier. For the majority of the Companys natural gas transactions, the
supplier is billed upon the conclusion of the transaction based on the estimated energy volume
transacted for the entire award term multiplied by the transaction fee. Management fees are paid by
the Companys energy consumers and are generally billed on a monthly basis for services rendered
based on terms and conditions included in contractual arrangements. While substantially all of the
Companys retail natural gas transactions are accounted in accordance with this policy, a certain
percentage are accounted for as the natural gas is consumed by the customer and recognized as
revenue in accordance with the retail electricity transaction revenue recognition methodology
described above.
Wholesale Transactions
Wholesale transaction fees are invoiced upon the conclusion of the auction based on a fixed
fee. These revenues are not tied to future energy usage and are recognized upon the completion of
the online auction. For reverse auctions where the Companys customers bid for a consumers
business, the fees are paid by the bidder. For forward auctions where a lister is selling energy,
the fees are typically paid by the lister. While substantially all wholesale transactions are
accounted for in this fashion, a small percentage of the Companys wholesale revenue is accounted
for as electricity or gas is delivered similar to the retail electricity transaction methodology
described above.
Environmental Commodity Transactions
Environmental commodity transaction fees are accounted for utilizing two primary methods. For
regulated allowance programs like RGGI, fees are paid by the lister and are recognized as revenue
quarterly as auctions are completed and approved. For all other environmental commodity
transactions both the lister and the bidder pay the transaction fee and revenue is recognized upon
the consummation of the underlying transaction as credits are delivered by the lister and payment
is made by the bidder.
Channel Partner Commissions
The Company pays commissions to its channel partners at contractual rates based on monthly
energy transactions between bidder and lister. The commission is accrued monthly and charged to
sales and marketing expense as revenue is recognized. The Company pays commissions to its
salespeople at contractual commission rates based upon cash collections from its customers.
Revenue Estimation
The Companys estimates in relation to revenue recognition affect revenue and sales and
marketing expense as reflected on its statements of operations, and trade accounts receivable and
accrued commissions accounts as reflected on its balance sheets. For any quarterly reporting
period, the Company may not have actual usage data for certain energy suppliers and will need to
estimate revenue. The Company records revenue based on the energy consumers historical usage
profile. At the end of each reporting period, historical revenue is adjusted to reflect actual
usage for the period and estimate usage where actual usage is not available. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, the Company estimated usage for approximately 8% of its revenue resulting in a
negative 0.6%, or approximately a $93,000 adjustment to reduce revenue. This decrease in revenue
resulted in an approximate $30,000 decrease in sales and marketing expense related to third party
commission expense associated with those revenues. Corresponding adjustments were made to trade
accounts receivable and accrued commissions, respectively. A 1% difference between this estimate
and actual usage would have an approximate $12,000 effect on the Companys revenue for the year
ended December 31, 2009.
Software Development
Certain acquired software and significant enhancements to the Companys software are
capitalized in accordance with guidance from the FASB. Accordingly, internally developed software
costs of approximately $82,000, $403,000, and $469,000 related to implementation, coding and
configuration have been capitalized in 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. The Company amortizes
internally developed and purchased software over the estimated useful life of the software
(generally three years). During 2009, 2008, and 2007, approximately $310,000, $239,000, and
$111,000, respectively, were amortized to cost of revenues resulting in accumulated amortization of
approximately $822,000 and $512,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. At December 31,
2009, future amortization expense for capitalized internally developed software is as follows:
2010 |
$ | 268,000 | ||
2011 |
113,000 | |||
2012 and thereafter |
18,000 | |||
$ | 399,000 | |||
46
Table of Contents
Pre- and post- software implementation and configuration costs have historically been
immaterial and charged to cost of revenue as incurred.
Goodwill
The Company uses assumptions in establishing the carrying value and fair value of its
goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable
net assets of acquired businesses. The Company accounts for goodwill that results from acquired
businesses in accordance with guidance from the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB),
under which goodwill and intangible assets having indefinite lives are not amortized but instead
are assigned to reporting units and tested for impairment annually or more frequently if changes in
circumstances or the occurrence of events indicate possible impairment.
The Company performs an annual impairment review during the fourth quarter of each year or
earlier if indicators of potential impairment exist. The impairment test for goodwill is a two-step
process. Step one consists of a comparison of the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying
amount, including the goodwill allocated to each reporting unit. If the carrying amount is in
excess of the fair value, step two requires the comparison of the implied fair value of the
reporting unit whereby the carrying amount of the reporting units goodwill over the implied fair
value of the reporting units goodwill will be recorded as an impairment loss. The Company
performed its annual impairment analysis in December 2009 and determined that no impairment of
goodwill or intangible assets existed.
Intangible Assets
The Company uses assumptions in establishing the carrying value, fair value and estimated
lives of its intangible assets. The criteria used for these assumptions include managements
estimate of the assets continuing ability to generate positive income from operations and positive
cash flow in future periods compared to the carrying value of the asset, as well as the strategic
significance of any identifiable intangible asset in the Companys business objectives. If assets
are considered impaired, the impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying value of the
assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Useful lives and related amortization expense are
based on an estimate of the period that the assets will generate revenues or otherwise be used by
the Company. Factors that would influence the likelihood of a material change in the Companys
reported results include significant changes in the assets ability to generate positive cash flow,
a significant decline in the economic and competitive environment on which the asset depends and
significant changes in the Companys strategic business objectives.
Intangible assets consist of customer relationships and contracts, purchased technology and
other intangibles, and are stated at cost less accumulated amortization. Intangible assets with a
definite life are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which
range from one to ten years. Amortization expense was approximately $1,200,000, $1,367,000 and
$813,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Accumulated
amortization of intangible assets amounted to approximately $3,380,000 and $2,180,000 at December
31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The approximate future amortization expense of intangible assets
is as follows:
2010 |
$ | 1,027,000 | ||
2011 |
957,000 | |||
2012 |
675,000 | |||
2013 |
473,000 | |||
2014 and thereafter |
1,618,000 | |||
$ | 4,750,000 | |||
Impairment of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets
In accordance with guidance from the FASB, the Company periodically reviews long-lived assets
and intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable or that the useful lives of those assets are
no longer appropriate. Recoverability of these assets is determined by comparing the forecasted
undiscounted net cash flows of the operation to which the assets relate to the carrying amount.
During 2009, no impairment test was performed of the Companys long-lived assets as there were no
changes in circumstances that indicated that the carrying value of assets was non-recoverable.
Income Taxes
In accordance with guidance from the FASB, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined
at the end of each period based on the future tax consequences that can be attributed to net
operating loss carryforwards, as well as differences between the financial statement carrying
amounts of the existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred income tax
expense or credits are based on changes in the asset or liability from period to period. Valuation
allowances are provided if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not
that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The realization of deferred tax
assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income. In determining the valuation
allowance, the Company considers past performance, expected future taxable income, and
qualitative factors which are considered to be appropriate in estimating future taxable
income.
47
Table of Contents
The Company has reviewed the tax positions taken, or to be taken, in its tax returns for all
tax years currently open to examination by the taxing authority in accordance with the FASBs
recognition and measurement standards. At December 31, 2009, there are no expected material,
aggregate tax effect of differences between tax return positions and the benefits recognized in the
Companys financial statements.
Share-Based Compensation
The Company recognizes the compensation from share-based awards on a straight-line basis over
the requisite service period of the award. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
share-based awards consisted of grants of restricted stock and stock options. The restrictions on
the restricted stock lapse over the vesting period. The vesting period of share-based awards is
determined by the board of directors, and is generally four years for employees. The per-share
weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007 was $2.68, $1.21 and $5.78, respectively, on the date of grant, using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions and estimated
forfeiture rates of 11%, 15% and 13% in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively:
Year ended | Expected | Risk | Expected | Expected | ||||||||||||
December 31, | Dividend Yield | Interest Rate | Option Life | Volatility | ||||||||||||
2009 |
| 2.28 | % | 4.75 years | 113 | % | ||||||||||
2008 |
| 1.67 | % | 4.75 years | 87 | % | ||||||||||
2007 |
| 4.66 | % | 4.61 years | 54 | % |
The Company elected to use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the weighted
average fair value of options granted. As the Companys stock has a limited trading history, prior
to the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company determined the volatility for stock options based on a
weighted combination of per share reported closing prices and historical and reported data for a
peer group of companies that issued options with substantially similar terms. During the fourth
quarter of 2009, the Company determined the volatility for stock options based on the reported
closing prices of the Companys stock since its initial public offering in November 2006 as
management had determined that this weighting was more indicative of the volatility to be in effect
during the expected term of the awards. The expected life of options has been determined utilizing
the simplified method as prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commissions Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based Payment. The risk-free interest rate is based on a treasury
instrument whose term is consistent with the expected life of the stock options. The Company has
not paid and does not anticipate paying cash dividends on its common stock; therefore, the expected
dividend yield is assumed to be zero. In addition, guidance from the FASB requires companies to
utilize an estimated forfeiture rate when calculating the expense for the period. As a result, the
Company applied an estimated forfeiture rate of 11% in 2009 and estimated forfeiture rates of
between 11% and 15%, during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 in determining the expense
recorded in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The effect on compensation
expense for the year ended December 31, 2008 from changes in the forfeiture rate in 2007 of
previous years stock option grants, resulted in an increase in compensation expense approximately
$11,000.
The approximate total share-based compensation expense for the periods presented is included
in the following expense categories:
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Cost of revenue |
$ | 93,000 | $ | 197,000 | $ | 103,000 | ||||||
Sales and marketing |
350,000 | 670,000 | 753,000 | |||||||||
General and administrative |
190,000 | 140,000 | 126,000 | |||||||||
Total share-based compensation |
$ | 633,000 | $ | 1,007,000 | $ | 982,000 | ||||||
As of December 31, 2009, there was approximately $1,138,000 of unrecognized compensation
expense related to share-based awards, including approximately $799,000 related to non-vested stock
option awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.67 years, and
approximately $339,000 related to non-vested restricted stock awards that is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 1.81 years. See Note 5 to the consolidated financial
statements for a summary of the share-based activity under the Companys stock-based employee
compensation plans for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
The Company accounts for transactions in which services are received from non-employees in
exchange for equity instruments based on the fair value of such services received or of the equity
instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measured. There were no share-based awards to
non-employees in 2009 or 2008. The Company granted 45,500 shares of restricted common stock during
2007 to non-employees in consideration for services performed. At the time of the grants, these
shares of restricted stock had a fair value of approximately $523,000, based on the fair value of
the Companys common stock at the grant date. The Company recognized a charge of approximately
$35,000 and
$488,000 to sales and marketing expense in the statements of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, related to these grants.
48
Table of Contents
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity
of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents. The Company invests excess cash in a US Treasury money
market fund that is Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis
over the estimated useful lives of the related assets or the life of the related lease, whichever
is shorter, which range from 3 to 7 years.
Advertising Expense
Advertising expense primarily includes promotional expenditures and is expensed as incurred,
as such efforts have not met the direct-response criteria required for capitalization. Amounts
incurred for advertising expense were not material for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and
2007.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Guidance from the FASB establishes standards for reporting and displaying comprehensive income
(loss) and its components in financial statements. Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the
change in stockholders equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other
events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The comprehensive income (loss) for all periods
presented does not differ from the reported net income (loss).
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Guidance from the FASB requires management to disclose the estimated fair value of certain
assets and liabilities defined as financial instruments. Financial instruments are generally
defined as cash, evidence of ownership interest in an entity, or a contractual obligation that both
conveys to one entity a right to receive cash or other financial instruments from another entity
and imposes on the other entity the obligation to deliver cash or other financial instruments to
the first entity. At December 31, 2009, management believes that the carrying value of cash and
cash equivalents, receivables and payables approximated fair value because of the short maturity of
these financial instruments.
Segment Reporting
Guidance from the FASB establishes standards for reporting information about operating
segments in financial statements. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise
about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief
decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Companys
chief decision maker is the president and chief operating officer. The Companys chief decision
maker reviews the results of operations based on one industry segment: the brokering of energy and
environmental commodities by conducting structured events utilizing online exchanges. The Company
delivers these services to three distinctive markets: retail energy, wholesale energy and
environmental commodity. The brokerage process is substantially the same regardless of the market
being serviced and are supported by the same operations personnel utilizing the same basic
technology and back office support. There is no discrete financial information for these product
lines nor are there segment managers who have operating responsibility for each product line.
Concentration of Credit Risk and Off-Balance Sheet Risk
Financial instruments that potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk
consist principally of cash and trade accounts receivable. The Company has no significant
off-balance sheet risk such as foreign exchange contracts, option contracts, or other foreign
hedging arrangements. The Company places its cash with primarily one institution, which management
believes is of high credit quality. As of December 31, 2009, approximately $800,000 of the
Companys cash and cash equivalents was invested in a highly liquid, U.S. Treasury money market
fund.
The Company earns commission payments from bidders based on transactions completed between
listers and bidders. The Company provides credit in the form of invoiced and unbilled accounts
receivable to bidders in the normal course of business. Collateral is not required for trade
accounts receivable, but ongoing credit evaluations of bidders are performed. While the majority
of the Companys revenue is generated from reverse auctions where the winning bidder pays a
commission to the Company, commission payments for forward auctions can be paid by the lister,
bidder or a combination of both. Management provides for an allowance for doubtful accounts on a
specifically
identified basis, as well as through historical experience applied to an aging of accounts,
if necessary. Trade accounts receivable are written off when deemed uncollectible. To date
write-offs have not been material.
49
Table of Contents
The following represents revenue and trade accounts receivable from bidders or listers
exceeding 10% of the total in each category:
Trade accounts receivable as of | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue for the year ended December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
Bidder / Lister | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
A |
15 | % | 22 | % | 21 | % | 23 | % | 33 | % | ||||||||||
B |
7 | % | 8 | % | 7 | % | 7 | % | 16 | % | ||||||||||
C |
9 | % | 7 | % | 11 | % | 15 | % | 18 | % |
In addition to its direct relationship with bidders, the Company also has direct contractual
relationships with listers for the online procurement of certain of their energy or environmental
needs. These listers are primarily large businesses and government organizations and do not have a
direct creditor relationship with the Company. For the year ended December 31, 2009, one of these
listers accounted for transactions resulting in 10% of the Companys aggregate revenue. For the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, two of these listers accounted for transactions resulting
at least 10% individually, respectively, and 23% and 30% in the aggregate of the Companys revenue,
respectively.
Loss Per Share
As of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company only had one issued and outstanding class
of stock common stock. As a result, the basic loss per share for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007 is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
The computed loss per share does not assume conversion, exercise, or contingent exercise of
securities that would have an anti-dilutive effect on loss per share. As the Company was in a net
loss position for the reported periods, all common stock equivalents were anti-dilutive.
Therefore, the weighted average of basic and diluted voting shares of common stock outstanding for
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were 8,512,060, 8,310,315 and 7,979,359,
respectively.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, 224,490, 10,373 and 922 weighted average shares issuable
relative to common stock options, common stock warrants and restricted stock, respectively, were
excluded from net loss per share since the inclusion of such shares would be anti-dilutive due to
the Companys net loss position. For the year ended December 31, 2008, 266,647, 82,724 and 24,583
weighted average shares issuable relative to common stock options, common stock warrants and
restricted stock, respectively, were excluded from net loss per share since the inclusion of such
shares would be anti-dilutive due to the Companys net loss position. For the year ended December
31, 2007, 182,638, 104,858 and 49,372 weighted average shares issuable relative to common stock
options, common stock warrants and restricted stock, respectively, were excluded from net loss per
share since the inclusion of such shares would be anti-dilutive due to the Companys net loss
position.
At December 31, 2009, 389,778 and 32,676 shares issuable relative to common stock options and
restricted stock, respectively, had exercise prices that exceeded the average market price of the
Companys common stock during the year ended December 31, 2009 and were excluded from the
calculation of diluted shares since the inclusion of such shares would be anti-dilutive. At
December 31, 2008, 221,825, 115,000 and 65,843 shares issuable relative to common stock options,
common stock warrants and restricted stock, respectively, had exercise prices that exceeded the
average market price of the Companys common stock during the year ended December 31, 2008 and were
excluded from the calculation of diluted shares since the inclusion of such shares would be
anti-dilutive. At December 31, 2007, 232,000 shares issuable relative to common stock options had
exercise prices that exceeded the average market price of the Companys common stock during the
year ended December 31, 2007 and were excluded from the calculation of diluted shares since the
inclusion of such shares would be anti-dilutive.
The Company did not declare or pay any dividends in 2009, 2008 and 2007.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) Topic 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, as the single source of
authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP. FASB ASC Topic 105 does not change current U.S. GAAP, but
is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all authoritative
literature related to a particular topic in one place. All existing accounting standard documents
will be superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the FASB Codification will
be considered non-authoritative. These provisions of FASB ASC Topic 105 are effective for interim
and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009 and, accordingly, are effective for the Company
for the current fiscal reporting period. The adoption
of this pronouncement did not have an impact on the Companys financial condition or results
of operations, but will impact its financial reporting process by eliminating all references to
pre-codification standards. On its effective date, the ASC superseded all then-existing non-SEC
accounting and reporting standards, and all other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature
not included in the ASC became non-authoritative.
50
Table of Contents
In December 2007, the FASB issued revised authoritative guidance that requires an acquiring
entity in a business combination to recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement
objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; and requires the acquirer to disclose to
investors and other users all of the information they need to evaluate and understand the nature
and financial effect of the business combination. This guidance is set forth in Topic 805 in the
ASC (ASC 805), and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption
of ASC 805 on January 1, 2009 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB amended U.S. GAAP with respect to derivative instruments and hedging
activities. This guidance is set forth in Topic 815-10 in the ASC (ASC 815-10). ASC 815-10 is
intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by
requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an
entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. Entities are required to
provide enhanced disclosures about: (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; (b) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for; and (c) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance,
and cash flows. ASC 815-10 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and
interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of ASC 815-10 on January 1, 2009
did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance set forth in Topic 820 in the ASC (ASC 820), to
require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial statements. The
Companys financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts
payable and accrued expenses. At December 31, 2009 and 2008 the carrying value of the Companys
financial instruments approximated fair value, due to their short-term nature.
In May 2009, the FASB issued guidance set forth in Topic 855 in the ASC (ASC 855), which
requires an entity to recognize in the financial statements the effects of all subsequent events
that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet.
For nonrecognized subsequent events that must be disclosed to keep the financial statements from
being misleading, an entity will be required to disclose the nature of the event as well as an
estimate of its financial effect, or a statement that an estimate cannot be made. The Company has
evaluated subsequent events through the issuance of its consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 3 TRADE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET
The Company does not invoice bidders for the monthly commissions earned on retail electricity
transactions and, therefore, reports a significant portion of its receivables as unbilled.
Unbilled accounts receivable represents managements best estimate of energy provided by the energy
suppliers to the energy consumers for a specific completed time period at contracted commission
rates.
The Company generally invoices bidders for commissions earned on retail natural gas and
wholesale transactions, which are reflected as billed accounts receivable. The total commission
earned on these transactions is recognized upon completion of the procurement event and is due
within 30 days of invoice. In addition, the Company invoices the bidder, lister or combination of
both for forward auctions performed for environmental commodity product transactions. These
transactions are earned and invoiced either upon lister acceptance of the auction results or, in
some cases, upon delivery of the credits or cash settlement of the transaction.
Trade accounts receivable, net consists of the following:
December 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Unbilled accounts receivable |
$ | 2,631,792 | $ | 1,901,892 | ||||
Billed accounts receivable |
314,527 | 487,089 | ||||||
2,946,319 | 2,388,981 | |||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
(37,295 | ) | (45,388 | ) | ||||
Trade accounts receivable, net |
$ | 2,909,024 | $ | 2,343,593 | ||||
51
Table of Contents
NOTE 4 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Property and equipment, net consists of the following:
December 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Leasehold improvements |
$ | 65,451 | $ | 65,451 | ||||
Equipment |
443,137 | 452,312 | ||||||
Furniture and fixtures |
435,579 | 434,147 | ||||||
944,167 | 951,910 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(573,134 | ) | (464,699 | ) | ||||
Property and equipment, net |
$ | 371,033 | $ | 487,211 | ||||
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $146,322,
$149,443 and $104,834, respectively. Property and equipment purchased under capital lease
obligations at December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $183,132 and $189,524, respectively. Accumulated
depreciation for property and equipment purchased under capital lease was $127,783 and $133,466 at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
NOTE 5 COMMON AND PREFERRED STOCK
Preferred Stock
The Companys Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation authorizes 5,000,000 shares of
$0.0001 par value undesignated preferred stock for issuance by the Companys board of directors.
No shares have been issued as of December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Common Stock
On June 1, 2007, the Company issued 537,500 common shares of World Energy in connection with
the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of EnergyGateway. The shares were valued at
approximately $6,536,000 based on the average closing price on the Toronto Stock Exchange for the
two days before and after the announcement date of $12.22 per share, as adjusted for the
one-for-ten reverse stock split noted below.
On March 27, 2009, the Company filed a previously approved Certificate of Amendment to the
Companys Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Delaware
to (i) effect a reverse stock split of its outstanding common stock at a ratio of one-for-ten; and
(ii) decrease the number of authorized shares of its common stock from 150,000,000 to 15,000,000.
As a result of the reverse stock split, the issued and outstanding shares of common stock were
reduced on a basis of one share for every ten shares outstanding. All of the Companys stock
related information including issued and outstanding common stock, stock options and warrants to
purchase common stock, restricted stock and loss per share for all periods presented have been
restated to reflect the reverse stock split.
On October 30, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with Bond Capital, Ltd. (Bond), a
strategic partner of the Company, for the purchase of up to $2.5 million of the Companys common
stock. Pursuant to the agreement, a purchasing entity, an affiliate of Bond, acquired $1.0 million
of World Energys common stock at $2.97 per share on November 6, 2009. The Company agreed to offer
an additional $1.5 million in Company shares on the same terms to Bond or its designee, with the
price to be determined at the time of investment, through January 15, 2010. Subsequent to December
31, 2009, affiliates of Bond purchased an additional $400,000 of Company stock at an average price
of $2.63 per share bringing the net amount raised under the financing agreement to $1.3 million.
Proceeds from the transactions will be used for general corporate purposes, including supporting
the Companys growth initiatives.
As of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, 8,850,474, 8,397,684 and 8,239,924 shares of common
stock were outstanding, respectively.
Treasury Stock
In connection with the vesting of restricted stock granted to employees the Company withheld
shares with value equivalent to employees minimum statutory obligation for the applicable income
and other employment taxes, and remitted the cash to the appropriate taxing authorities. The
total shares withheld of 25,840 and 13,043 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, were based on the value of the restricted stock on their vesting date as determined
by the Companys closing stock price. Total payment for employees tax obligations was
approximately $93,000 and $99,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. These net-share
settlements had the effect of share repurchases by the Company as they reduced the number of
shares that would have otherwise been issued as a result of the vesting and did not represent an
expense to the Company.
52
Table of Contents
Common Stock Warrants
At December 31, 2009, the Company had outstanding warrants to purchase 4,260 shares of common stock
at a weighted average exercise price of $0.30. On November 16, 2006 and December 5, 2006, the
Company granted the underwriters of the initial public offering warrants to purchase up to 100,000
and 15,000 shares of common stock, respectively at the initial public offering price. The warrants
were exercisable at the one-year anniversary of the warrants issuance and expired on May 15, 2009
and June 4, 2009, respectively. The following table summarizes the Companys warrant activity:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Shares | Exercise Price | |||||||
Warrants outstanding, December 31, 2006 and 2007 |
200,081 | $ | 5.42 | |||||
Granted |
| $ | | |||||
Exercised |
(67,123 | ) | $ | 0.30 | ||||
Canceled/expired |
| $ | | |||||
Warrants outstanding, December 31, 2008 |
132,958 | $ | 8.00 | |||||
Granted |
| $ | | |||||
Exercised |
| $ | | |||||
Canceled/expired |
(128,698 | ) | $ | 8.27 | ||||
Warrants outstanding, December 31, 2009 |
4,260 | $ | 0.30 | |||||
The weighed average remaining contractual life of warrants outstanding is 0.50 years as of
December 31, 2009.
NOTE 6 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Stock Options
The Company has two stock incentive plans: the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, or the 2003 Plan,
and the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, or the 2006 Plan. As of December 31, 2009, 304,731 shares of
common stock representing option grants still outstanding were reserved under the 2003 Plan. No
further grants are allowed under the 2003 Plan. On November 16, 2006, the Company adopted the
2006 Plan and authorized 473,816 shares of common stock for grant thereunder. During the second
quarter of 2008, stockholders amended the 2006 Plan to increase the number of shares of common
stock covered by the plan by 400,000 shares. As of December 31, 2009, 698,772 shares of common
stock were reserved under the 2006 Plan representing 355,157 outstanding stock options, 34,301
shares of restricted stock outstanding and 309,314 shares available for grant. A summary of stock
option activity under both plans for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 are as
follows:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Shares | Exercise Price | |||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
448,303 | $ | 2.55 | |||||
Granted |
302,000 | $ | 12.45 | |||||
Canceled |
(68,750 | ) | $ | 8.24 | ||||
Exercised |
(11,250 | ) | $ | 0.25 | ||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 |
670,303 | $ | 6.47 | |||||
Granted |
120,600 | $ | 2.00 | |||||
Canceled |
(106,374 | ) | $ | 12.93 | ||||
Exercised |
(58,073 | ) | $ | 0.29 | ||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
626,456 | $ | 5.08 | |||||
Granted |
242,700 | $ | 3.47 | |||||
Canceled |
(156,248 | ) | $ | 9.85 | ||||
Exercised |
(53,020 | ) | $ | 0.55 | ||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
659,888 | $ | 3.73 | |||||
53
Table of Contents
A summary of common stock options outstanding and common stock options exercisable as of
December 31, 2009 is as follows:
Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining | Aggregate | Number | Remaining | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||||||||
Range of | Contractual | Intrinsic | of Shares | Contractual | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||||||||
Exercise Prices | Options | Life | Value | Exercisable | Life | Value | ||||||||||||||||||
$0.20 $1.99 |
162,530 | 0.86 Years | $ | 433,955 | 162,530 | 0.86 Years | $ | 433,955 | ||||||||||||||||
$2.00 $3.80 |
360,480 | 5.85 Years | 84,974 | 85,005 | 3.32 Years | 34,880 | ||||||||||||||||||
$3.81 $11.29 |
97,001 | 4.27 Years | | 59,477 | 3.58 Years | | ||||||||||||||||||
$11.30 $13.40 |
39,877 | 4.31 Years | | 26,381 | 4.31 Years | | ||||||||||||||||||
659,888 | 4.30 Years | $ | 518,929 | 333,393 | 2.24 Years | $ | 468,835 | |||||||||||||||||
The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2009 was
approximately $161,000. At December 31, 2009, the weighted average exercise price of options
outstanding and exercisable was $3.73 and $3.57, respectively. The weighted average fair value of
option grants for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $2.68 and $1.21, respectively.
Restricted Stock
A summary of restricted stock activity for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
are as follows:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Shares | Grant Price | |||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
| $ | | |||||
Granted |
192,850 | $ | 11.28 | |||||
Canceled |
(8,000 | ) | $ | 12.11 | ||||
Vested |
(40,000 | ) | $ | 12.11 | ||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 |
144,850 | $ | 11.00 | |||||
Granted |
79,300 | $ | 8.65 | |||||
Canceled |
(59,940 | ) | $ | 10.22 | ||||
Vested |
(45,607 | ) | $ | 11.18 | ||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
118,603 | $ | 9.76 | |||||
Granted |
38,559 | $ | 3.45 | |||||
Canceled |
(33,943 | ) | $ | 9.45 | ||||
Vested |
(88,918 | ) | $ | 6.90 | ||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
34,301 | $ | 10.38 | |||||
There were
1,003,503 shares reserved for issuance under these plans at December 31, 2009.
401(k) Plan
The Companys 401(k) savings plan covers the majority of the Companys eligible employees.
Employees of the Company may participate in the 401(k) Plan after reaching the age of 21. The
Company may make discretionary matching contributions as determined from time to time. Employee
contributions vest immediately, while Company matching contributions begin to vest after one year
service and continue to vest at 20% per year over the next five years. To date, the Company has
not made any discretionary contributions to the 401(k) Plan.
NOTE 7 RELATED PARTIES
In 2006, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a member of the Board to assist
the Company with strategic planning. Costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2007 were
approximately $209,000 and were charged to general and administrative expense. The agreement
expired in 2007 and no amounts were charged to expense during the years ended December 31, 2008.
During 2009, the Company incurred approximately $20,000 of consulting fees for advisory services
performed by this Board member. Approximately $2,000 was outstanding at December 31, 2009.
54
Table of Contents
NOTE 8 INCOME TAXES
The components of the net deferred tax asset are as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
$ | 468,643 | $ | 481,668 | ||||
Commission income |
| (623,358 | ) | |||||
Accruals and reserves |
9,469 | 774,629 | ||||||
Prepaids |
| (53,594 | ) | |||||
Net operating loss carryforwards |
7,470,335 | 6,756,612 | ||||||
7,948,447 | 7,335,957 | |||||||
Valuation allowance |
(7,948,447 | ) | (7,335,957 | ) | ||||
$ | | $ | | |||||
The provision for income taxes is comprised of the following:
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Current income tax expense: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
State |
| | | |||||||||
| | | ||||||||||
Deferred income tax expense: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
| | 823,703 | |||||||||
State |
| | 238,017 | |||||||||
| | 1,061,720 | ||||||||||
Total income tax expense: |
$ | | $ | | $ | 1,061,720 | ||||||
A reconciliation of the Companys federal statutory tax rate to its effective rate is as
follows:
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Income tax at federal statutory rate |
(34.0 | )% | (34.0 | )% | (34.0 | )% | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in tax resulting from: |
||||||||||||
State taxes, net of federal benefit |
(6.3 | )% | (6.3 | )% | (6.3 | )% | ||||||
Permanent differences |
6.0 | % | 0.7 | % | 0.7 | % | ||||||
Change in valuation allowance |
34.3 | % | 39.6 | % | 53.6 | % | ||||||
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 14.0 | % | |||||||
As of December 31, 2009, the Company has federal net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $18,800,000 which begin to expire in 2022, and state net operating loss carryforwards
of approximately $15,700,000, which begin to expire in 2010. A valuation allowance is established,
if it is more likely than not, that all or a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be
realized.
In accordance with guidance from the FASB, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined
at the end of each period based on the future tax consequences that can be attributed to net
operating loss carryforwards, as well as differences between the financial statement carrying
amounts of the existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred income tax
expense or credits are based on changes in the asset or liability from period to period. Valuation
allowances are provided if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not
that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The realization of deferred tax
assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income. In determining the valuation
allowance, the Company considers past performance, expected future taxable income, and qualitative
factors which are considered to be appropriate in estimating future taxable income. The Companys
forecast of expected future taxable income is for future periods that can be reasonably estimated.
The Company has historically utilized a three year forecasting window to determine its expected
future taxable income. As of December 31, 2006, the Company had cumulative net income for the three
years then ended and the expected future taxable income anticipated from 2007 through 2009 was
deemed adequate on a present value basis to benefit the majority of the Companys deferred tax
assets (primarily net operating loss carryforwards). During 2007, the Company accelerated its
growth in excess of its initial expectations to address the strategic initiatives outlined at the
time of its initial public offering. The Company grew from 20 employees as of December 31, 2006 to
63 as of December 31, 2007, acquired one of its main competitors in the retail energy market, and
developed its wholesale and environmental commodity product lines. These initiatives increased the
Companys loss for 2007 resulting in a three-year cumulative loss as of December 31, 2007 and
increased its near term operating expenses. A three-year cumulative loss is significant negative
evidence in considering whether the deferred tax assets are realizable and generally precludes
relying on projections of future taxable income to support the recovery of deferred tax assets.
While the Company expects its future income will be adequate on a
present value basis to benefit substantially all of its current deferred tax assets, the
recent three-year cumulative loss is given more weight than projected future income when
determining the need for a valuation. Therefore, during the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company
recorded a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets of approximately $4.1 million,
and maintains a cumulative valuation allowance of approximately $7.9 million at December 31, 2009.
55
Table of Contents
The amount of the net deferred tax asset considered realizable at December 31, 2009 could be
reduced or increased in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward
period change.
The Company files income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction and various
states. The Company has reviewed the tax positions taken, or to be taken, in its tax returns for
all tax years currently open to examination by the taxing authorities. With few exceptions, the
Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax examination by tax
authorities for years before 2006. At December 31, 2009, there are no expected material, aggregate
tax effect of differences between tax return positions and the benefits recognized in the financial
statements.
Under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, certain substantial changes in the
Companys ownership may have limited or may limit in the future the amount of net operating loss
carryforwards which could be utilized annually to offset future taxable income and income tax
liabilities. The amount of any annual limitation is determined based upon the Companys value prior
to an ownership change.
NOTE 9 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Leases
The Company leases certain equipment under capital leases that expire through May 2011 and are
collateralized by the related equipment. The Company has accounted for these leases using
incremental borrowing rates ranging from 5.8% to 8.0%. The Company maintains operating leases for
office space in five locations in the United States, paid in installments due the beginning of each
month and that expire through July 2012. Future aggregate minimum payments under capital and
operating leases as of December 31, 2009 were as follows:
Capital | Operating | |||||||
Leases | Leases | |||||||
2010 |
$ | 17,721 | $ | 316,345 | ||||
2011 |
15,327 | 142,065 | ||||||
2012 |
1,211 | 42,973 | ||||||
2013 |
| | ||||||
2014 |
| | ||||||
Total future minimum lease payments |
34,259 | $ | 501,383 | |||||
Less: amounts representing interest |
(2,081 | ) | ||||||
Present value of future minimum lease payments |
32,178 | |||||||
Less: current portion |
16,175 | |||||||
Capital lease obligation, net of current portion |
$ | 16,003 | ||||||
The accompanying statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
includes $387,712, $369,215 and $242,813 of rent expense, respectively.
Service Agreement
In 2007, the Company entered into a service agreement with an unrelated party for a hosting
environment and dedicated server for the Companys online energy procurement software. The terms of
the agreement requires quarterly payments amounting to approximately $8,400. The agreement expires
in May 2010 with an automatic one year renewal clause.
NOTE 10 CREDIT ARRANGEMENT
On September 30, 2009, the Company entered into a First Loan Modification Agreement (the
Modification Agreement) with SVB. The Modification Agreement amends and extends the Loan and
Security Agreement with SVB dated September 8, 2008. Under the Modification Agreement, SVB has
committed to make advances to the Company in an aggregate amount of up to $3,000,000, subject to
availability against certain eligible accounts receivable and eligible retail backlog through March
7, 2011. The credit facility now bears interest at a floating rate per annum based on the prime
rate plus 1.25% on advances made against eligible accounts receivable and prime rate plus 2.00% on
advances made against eligible retail backlog, with the prime rate being subject to a 4.00% floor.
These interest rates are subject to change based on the Companys maintenance of an adjusted quick
ratio of one-to-one.
56
Table of Contents
The Company has not taken advances under the facility and there were no outstanding borrowings
at December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2009, the Company was in compliance with its covenants
under the facility.
NOTE 11 ACQUISITION
On June 1, 2007, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of EnergyGateway for
$4,951,758 in cash and 537,500 common shares of World Energy plus the assumption of certain
liabilities. The shares were valued at approximately $6,536,000 based on the average closing price
on the Toronto Stock Exchange for the two days before and after the announcement date of $12.22 per
share, as adjusted for the one-for-ten reverse stock split. Approximately 217,500 of the shares
that the Company delivered to EnergyGateway in connection with this transaction, or their cash
value, if liquidated, were being held in escrow for 18 months following the closing of the sale to
secure various indemnification obligations of EnergyGateway and its members. The indemnification
period was for 18 months and the shares were released from escrow at the end of the indemnification
period on November 1, 2008. EnergyGateway, located near Columbus, Ohio, provided online energy
procurement and value-added energy services to customers in many major industries in the United
States and Canada, from large multi-site Fortune 500 industrials to middle market manufacturing and
small commercial operations.
The total purchase price was $11,440,358, net of cash acquired, and includes related
acquisition costs of $229,500, plus the assumption of certain liabilities in the amount of
$138,128. The EnergyGateway operations have been included within the Companys consolidated results
from June 1, 2007. The cost of the acquisition was allocated to the assets and liabilities assumed
based on estimates of their respective fair values at the date of acquisition resulting in net
assets of $8,261,657. The excess purchase price of $3,178,701 has been recorded as goodwill which
is fully deductible for tax purposes. Management is responsible for the valuation of net assets
acquired and considered a number of factors, including valuations and appraisals, when estimating
the fair values and estimated useful lives of acquired assets and liabilities.
The Company allocated the purchase price for the acquisition as follows:
Current assets |
$ | 247,938 | ||
Fixed assets |
18,755 | |||
Other assets |
3,092 | |||
Intangible assets: |
||||
Non-compete agreements |
680,000 | |||
Customer relationships |
4,740,000 | |||
Customer contracts |
500,000 | |||
Supplier agreements |
380,000 | |||
Developed technology |
1,830,000 | |||
Goodwill |
3,178,701 | |||
Current liabilities |
(138,128 | ) | ||
Net assets acquired |
$ | 11,440,358 | ||
The intangible assets, excluding goodwill, are being amortized on a straight-line basis over
their weighted average lives as follows: non-compete agreements 1 to 5 years; customer
relationships 10 years; customer contracts 3 years; supplier agreements 5 years; and
developed technology 5 years. The Company performs an annual impairment test for goodwill, with
any excess of the carrying value of a reporting units goodwill over the implied fair value of the
goodwill recorded as an impairment loss.
57
Table of Contents
NOTE 12 SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents selected unaudited consolidated financial results for each of the
eight quarters in the two-year period ended December 31, 2009. In the Companys opinion, this
unaudited information has been prepared on the same basis as the audited information and includes
all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the financial information for the periods
presented.
For The Quarters Ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, | June 30, | September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
2009 |
||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 3,977,779 | $ | 3,682,476 | $ | 3,458,262 | $ | 3,499,758 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
2,887,827 | 2,697,580 | 2,564,594 | 2,758,317 | ||||||||||||
Operating loss |
(663,957 | ) | (793,060 | ) | (635,209 | ) | (235,242 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss |
(665,074 | ) | (795,104 | ) | (636,702 | ) | (236,639 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss per common share basic and diluted |
$ | (0.08 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | (0.08 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
and diluted |
8,419,721 | 8,446,999 | 8,468,500 | 8,710,305 | ||||||||||||
2008 |
||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 3,114,517 | $ | 2,760,695 | $ | 3,289,515 | $ | 3,279,965 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
1,878,464 | 1,483,836 | 2,176,190 | 2,353,987 | ||||||||||||
Operating loss |
(2,186,255 | ) | (2,387,730 | ) | (1,221,038 | ) | (1,039,668 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss |
(2,159,942 | ) | (2,380,317 | ) | (1,215,820 | ) | (1,039,081 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss per common share basic and diluted |
$ | (0.26 | ) | $ | (0.29 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.12 | ) | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
and diluted |
8,251,948 | 8,288,673 | 8,321,595 | 8,378,173 |
58
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | Description | |||
2.1 | Asset Purchase Agreement by and among World Energy Solutions, Inc., EnergyGateway, LLC and the Members of EnergyGateway, LLC dated May
23, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to our report on Form 8-K filed May 24, 2007). |
|||
3.1 | Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of World Energy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to our Registration
Statement of Form S-1 (File No. 333-136528)). |
|||
3.2 | Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of World Energy Solutions, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our report on Form 8-K filed March 30, 2009). |
|||
3.3 | Form of Amended and Restated By-laws of World Energy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to our Registration Statement of Form
S-1(File No. 333-136528)). |
|||
4.1 | Specimen Certificate evidencing shares of common stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Registration Statement of Form
S-1 (File No. 333-136528)). |
|||
10.1 | + | 2003 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Registration Statement of Form S-1 (File No. 333-136528)). |
||
10.2 | + | 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Registration Statement of Form S-1 (File No. 333-136528)). |
||
10.3 | Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated November 7, 2005, between World Energy and Massachusetts Capital Resource Company
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Registration Statement of Form S-1 (File No. 333-136528)). |
|||
10.4 | Subordinated Note due 2013, dated November 7, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Registration Statement of Form S-1
(File No. 333-136528)). |
|||
10.5 | Voting Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated November 7, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Registration Statement
of Form S-1 (File No. 333-136528)). |
|||
10.6 | Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrants (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Registration Statement of Form S-1 (File No.
333-136528)). |
|||
10.7 | Solicitation/Contract/Order for Commercial Items, dated September 28, 2005, between U.S. General Services Administration and World
Energy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to our Registration Statement of Form S-1 (File No. 333-136528)). |
|||
10.8 | Agreement to Provide Software and Support for a Reverse Energy Auction Procurement to the Maryland Department of General Services,
dated March 16, 2006, by and between World Energy and the State of Maryland (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to our
Registration Statement of Form S-1 (File No. 333-136528)). |
|||
10.9 | ++ | Contract, dated January 9, 2006, by and between Montgomery County, Maryland and World Energy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9
to our Registration Statement of Form S-1 (File No. 333-136528)). |
||
10.10 | Emergency Purchase/Interim Agreement, dated March 28, 2006, by and between the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of General
Services and World Energy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to our Registration Statement of Form S-1 (File No. 333-136528)). |
|||
10.11 | Professional Services Agreement, dated June 1, 2005, between World Energy and Science Applications International Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to our Registration Statement of Form S-1 (File No. 333-136528)). |
|||
10.12 | Escrow Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to our Registration Statement of Form S-1 (File No. 333-136528)). |
|||
10.13 | + | Offer letter agreement, dated October 1, 2003, between World Energy and Philip V. Adams (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to
our Registration Statement of Form S-1(File No. 333-136528)). |
||
10.14 | + | Offer letter agreement, dated April 5, 2006, between World Energy and James Parslow (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to our
Registration Statement of Form S-1 (File No. 333-136528)). |
||
10.15 | Lease, dated September 8, 2004, between Sovereign Bank and World Energy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to our Registration
Statement of Form S-1(File No. 333-136528)). |
|||
10.16 | Lease, dated June 21, 2006, between Roosevelt Land, LP and World Energy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to our Registration
Statement of Form S-1 (File No. 333-136528)). |
|||
10.17 | Form of Warrant being issued to Underwriters (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to our Registration Statement of Form S-1
(File No. 333-136528)). |
|||
10.18 | Form of Registration Rights Agreement with Underwriters (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to our Registration Statement of
Form S-1 (File No. 333-136528)). |
|||
10.19 | Loan and Security Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank dated September 8, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our report
on Form 8-K filed September 8, 2008). |
|||
10.20 | First Loan Modification, dated September 30, 2009 to Loan and Security Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to our report on Form 8-K filed
October 6, 2009). |
|||
10.21 | * | Form of Securities Purchase Agreement executed
with respect to $1.4 million in common stock purchases made by
certain investors. |
||
21.1 | * | List of Subsidiaries. |
||
23.1 | * | Consent of UHY LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
||
31.1 | * | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act. |
||
31.2 | * | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act. |
59
Table of Contents
Exhibit | Description | |||
32.1 | * | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act. |
||
32.2 | * | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act. |
||
99.1 | + | Third Amendment of Consulting Agreement dated October 9, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to our report on Form 8-K
filed October 12, 2007). |
||
99.2 | + | Second Amendment of Consulting Agreement dated July 5, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to our report on Form 8-K filed
July 5, 2007). |
||
99.3 | + | Amended Consulting Agreement dated April 5, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to our report on Form 8-K filed April 9,
2007). |
||
99.4 | + | Consulting Agreement dated January 10, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to our report on Form 8-K filed January 11, 2007). |
* | Filed herewith |
|
+ | Indicates a management contract or any compensatory plan, contract or arrangement |
|
++ | Confidential treatment requested as to certain portions, which portions have been filed separately with the Securities and
Exchange Commission |
60