UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-K

 

þ  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

 

Commission File Number 1-6003

 

FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of the Company as specified in its charter)

 

The Company’s telephone number, including area code

(630) 954-2000

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes o     No þ

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  Yes o     No þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Company (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Company was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceeding 12 months (or shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Company’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a shell company, in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  Yes o     No þ

 

State the aggregate market value of voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the Company as of June 30, 2009: Common stock, $1.00 par value — $368,510,675

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Company’s classes of common stock, as of January 31, 2010: Common stock, $1.00 par value — 48,713,962 shares

 

Documents Incorporated By Reference

 

Portions of the definitive proxy statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III.

 

 

FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION
Index to Form 10-K

 

This Form 10-K and other reports filed by Federal Signal Corporation and subsidiaries (“the Company”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission and comments made by management may contain the words such as “may,” “will,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “estimate” and “objective” or the negative thereof or similar terminology concerning the Company’s future financial performance, business strategy, plans, goals and objectives. These expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include information concerning the Company’s possible or assumed future performance or results of operations and are not guarantees of future events or results. While these statements are based on assumptions and judgments that management has made in light of industry experience as well as perceptions of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors believed to be appropriate under the circumstances, they are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different.

 

These risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond the Company’s control, include the cyclical nature of the Company’s industrial, municipal, government and commercial markets; availability of credit and third-party financing for customers; volatility in securities trading markets; economic downturns; risks associated with suppliers, dealer and other partner alliances; changes in cost competitiveness including those resulting from foreign currency movements; technological advances by competitors; increased warranty and product liability expenses; compliance with environmental and safety regulations; restrictive debt covenants; disruptions in the supply of parts or components from sole source suppliers and subcontractors; retention of key employees and general changes in the competitive environment. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the risk factors described under Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in this Form 10-K. These factors may not constitute all factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in any forward-looking statement. The Company operates in a continually changing business environment and new factors emerge from time to time. The Company cannot predict such factors nor can it assess the impact, if any, of such factors on its financial position or results of operations. Accordingly, forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a predictor of actual results. The Company disclaims any responsibility to update any forward-looking statement provided in this Form 10-K.

 

 

Federal Signal Corporation, founded in 1901, was reincorporated as a Delaware corporation in 1969. The Company designs and manufactures a suite of products and integrated solutions for municipal, governmental, industrial and commercial customers. Federal Signal’s portfolio of products includes safety and security systems, vacuum loader vehicles, street sweepers, truck mounted aerial platforms and waterblasters. Federal Signal Corporation and its subsidiaries (referred to collectively as “the Company” or “Company” herein, unless context otherwise indicates) operate 19 manufacturing facilities in 7 countries around the world serving customers in approximately 100 countries in all regions of the world.

 

Narrative Description of Business

 

Products manufactured and services rendered by the Company are divided into three major operating segments: Safety and Security Systems, Fire Rescue and Environmental Solutions. The individual operating companies are organized as such because they share certain characteristics, including technology, marketing, distribution and product application, which create long-term synergies.

 

Financial information (net sales, operating income (loss), depreciation and amortization, capital expenditures and identifiable assets) concerning the Company’s three operating segments as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and for each of the three years in the period ended, December 31, 2009 are included in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K, and incorporated herein by reference. Information regarding the Company’s discontinued operations is included in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K, and incorporated herein by reference.

 

Safety and Security Systems Group

 

Federal Signal Corporation’s Safety and Security Systems Group designs, manufactures and deploys comprehensive safety and security systems and products that help law enforcement, fire/rescue and Emergency Medical Services, emergency operations and industrial plant/facility first responders protect people, property and the environment.

 

Offerings include systems for automated license plate recognition, campus and community alerting, emergency vehicles, first responder interoperable communications, industrial communications and command, municipal networked security, vehicle classification and parking revenue and access control for municipal, governmental and industrial applications. Specific products include access control devices, lightbars and sirens, public warning sirens, public safety software and automated license plate recognition cameras.

 

Products are sold under the Federal Signal, Federal Signal VAMA, Federal APD, PIPS, Idris, Target Tech and Victor brand names. The group operates manufacturing facilities in North America, Europe and South Africa. Many of the group’s products are designed in accordance with various regulatory codes and standards and meet agency approvals such as Underwriters Laboratory (UL), International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and American Bureau of Shipping (ABS).

 

In 2009, the Company acquired Diamond Consulting Services Ltd. (“DCS”) which specializes in vehicle classification systems for tolling and other Intelligent Transportation Systems (“ITS”).

 

Segment results have been restated for all periods presented to exclude the operations of the group’s Pauluhn business which were reclassified as discontinued operations and sold in 2009.

 

Fire Rescue Group

 

The Fire Rescue Group is the world leader in designing and manufacturing sophisticated, vehicle-mounted, aerial platforms for fire fighting, rescue, electric utility and industrial uses. End customers include fire departments, industrial fire services, electric utilities, maintenance rental companies for applications such as fire fighting and rescue, transmission line maintenance, and installation and maintenance of wind turbines. The group’s telescopic/

articulated aerial platforms are designed in accordance with various regulatory codes and standards, such as European Norms (EN), National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and American National Standards Institute (ANSI). In addition to equipment sales, the group sells parts, service and training as part of a complete offering to its customer base. The group manufactures in Finland and sells globally under the Bronto Skylift brand name.

 

Segment results have been restated for all periods presented to exclude the operations of the group’s E-ONE business which were reclassified as discontinued operations and sold in 2008.

 

Environmental Solutions Group

 

The Environmental Solutions Group manufactures and markets worldwide a full range of street cleaning and vacuum loader vehicles and high-performance water blasting equipment. Products are also manufactured for the newer markets of hydro-excavation, glycol recovery and surface cleaning. Products are sold under the Elgin, Vactor, Guzzler and Jetstream brand names. The group primarily manufactures its vehicles and equipment in the United States.

 

Under the Elgin brand name, the Company sells the leading U.S. brand of street sweepers primarily designed for large-scale cleaning of curbed streets, parking lots and other paved surfaces utilizing mechanical sweeping, vacuum and recirculating air technology for cleaning. Vactor is a leading manufacturer of municipal combination catch basin/sewer cleaning vacuum trucks. Guzzler is a leader in industrial vacuum loaders that clean up industrial waste or recover and recycle valuable raw materials. Jetstream manufactures high pressure water blast equipment and accessories for commercial and industrial cleaning and maintenance operations. In addition to equipment sales, the group is increasingly engaged in the sale of parts and tooling, service and repair, equipment rentals and training as part of a complete offering to its customer base.

 

Segment results have been restated for all periods presented to exclude the operation of the group’s Ravo business which was reclassified as discontinued operations and sold in 2009.

 

Tool Group

 

In 2008, the Company sold the remaining businesses within the Tool Group, referred to collectively as “Die and Mold Operations”. The results of the Die and Mold Operations are reported within discontinued operations for all periods presented.

 

Financial Services

 

The Company ceased entering into new financial services activities in 2008 and sold 92% of its municipal lease portfolio during 2008. The operating results and gain recorded upon sale are reported within discontinued operations. At December 31, 2009, the remaining leases and floor plan receivable balances, net of reserves, of $2.6 million were included on the balance sheet as Assets of Discontinued Operations.

 

Marketing and Distribution

 

The Safety and Security Systems Group companies sell to industrial customers through approximately 2,000 wholesalers/distributors who are supported by Company sales personnel and/or independent manufacturers’ representatives. Products are also sold to municipal and governmental customers through more than 900 active independent distributors as well as through original equipment manufacturers and direct sales. International sales are made through the group’s independent foreign distributors or on a direct basis. The Company also sells comprehensive integrated warning, interoperable communications and parking systems through a combination of a direct sales force and distributors.

 

Fire Rescue and Environmental Solutions use dealer networks and direct sales to service customers generally depending on the type and location of the customer. The Environmental Solutions direct sales channel concentrates on the industrial, utility and construction market segments while the dealer networks focus primarily on the municipal markets. The Company believes its national and global dealer networks for vehicles distinguish it from its competitors. Dealer representatives demonstrate the vehicles’ functionality and capability to customers and service the vehicles on a timely basis.

Customers and Backlog

 

Approximately 37%, 21% and 42% of the Company’s total 2009 orders were to U.S. municipal and government customers, U.S. commercial and industrial customers, and non-U.S. customers, respectively. No single customer accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s business.

 

The Company’s U.S. municipal and government customers depend on tax revenues to support spending. A sluggish industrial economy, therefore, will eventually impact a municipality’s revenue base as tax receipts decline due to higher levels of unemployment and declining profits. Additionally, a decline in housing prices may yield lower property tax receipts. During 2009, the Company’s U.S. municipal and government orders declined 14% from 2008, compared to a 12% decrease in these orders in 2008 compared to 2007.

 

Orders to the U.S. commercial and industrial segment relate to the energy industries, principally oil and gas production and coal mining, to industrial contractors and rental companies and to parking operators.

 

Approximately 80% of orders to non-U.S. customers flow to municipalities and governments while approximately 20% flow to industrial and commercial customers. The municipal and government segment is essentially similar to the U.S. in that it is largely dependent on tax revenues to support spending. Of the non-U.S. orders, the Company typically sells approximately 47% of its products in Europe, 16% in the Middle East and Africa, 14% in Canada and less than 10% in any other particular region.

 

The Company’s backlog totaled $171 million at December 31, 2009, which averages to nearly three months of shipments overall. Backlogs vary by group due to the nature of the Company’s products and buying patterns of its customers. Safety and Security Systems typically maintains an average backlog of two months of shipments, Environmental Solutions three to four months of shipments and Fire Rescue normally six months of shipments.

 

Suppliers

 

The Company purchases a wide variety of raw materials from around the world for use in the manufacture of its products, although the majority of current purchases are from North American sources. To minimize availability, price and quality risk, the Company is party to numerous strategic supplier arrangements. Although certain materials are obtained from either a single-source supplier or a limited number of suppliers, the Company has identified alternative sources to minimize the interruption to its business in the event of supply problems.

 

Components critical to the production of the Company’s vehicles, such as engines and hydraulic systems, are purchased from a select number of suppliers. The Company also purchases raw and fabricated steel as well as commercial chassis with certain specifications from a few sources.

 

The Company believes it has adequate supplies or sources of availability of the raw materials and components necessary to meet its needs. However, there are risks and uncertainties with respect to the supply of certain of these raw materials that could impact their price, quality and availability in sufficient quantities.

 

Competition

 

Within specific product categories and domestic markets, the Safety and Security Systems Group companies are among the leaders with three to four strong competitors and several additional ancillary market participants. The group’s international market position varies from leader to ancillary participant depending on the geographic region and product line. Generally, competition is intense with all of the group’s products, and purchase decisions are made based on competitive bidding, price, reputation, performance and servicing.

 

Within the Fire Rescue Group, Bronto Skylift is established as the global leader for aerial platforms used in fire fighting, rescue and industrial markets. Competitor offerings can include trailer mounted articulated aerials and traditional fire trucks with ladders. Bronto competes on product performance where it holds technological advantages in its designs, materials and production processes.

 

Within the Environmental Solutions Group, Elgin is recognized as the market leader among several domestic sweeper competitors and differentiates itself primarily on product performance. Vactor and Guzzler both maintain the leading domestic position in their respective marketplaces by enhancing product performance with leading

technology and application flexibility. Jetstream is a market leader in the in-plant cleaning segment of the U.S. waterblast industry competing on product performance and rapid delivery.

 

Research and Development

 

The information concerning the Company’s research and development activities included in Note 16 of the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Patents and Trademarks

 

The Company owns a number of patents and possesses rights under others to which it attaches importance, but does not believe that its business as a whole is materially dependent upon any such patents or rights. The Company also owns a number of trademarks that it believes are important in connection with the identification of its products and associated goodwill with customers, but no material part of the Company’s business is dependent on such trademarks.

 

Employees

 

The Company employed approximately 2,600 people in ongoing businesses at the close of 2009. Approximately 32% of the Company’s domestic hourly workers were represented by unions at December 31, 2009. The Company believes relations with its employees to be good.

 

Governmental Regulation of the Environment

 

The Company believes it substantially complies with federal, state and local provisions that have been enacted or adopted regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment. Capital expenditures in 2009 attributable to compliance with such laws were not material. The Company believes that the overall impact of compliance with environmental regulations will not have a material adverse effect on its future operations.

 

Seasonality

 

Certain of the Company’s businesses are susceptible to the influences of seasonal buying or delivery patterns causing lower sales typically in both the first and third calendar quarters compared to other quarters. The Company’s businesses which tend to experience this seasonality include aerial platforms and European light bars and sirens.

 

Additional Information

 

The Company makes its Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, other reports and information filed with the SEC and amendments to those reports available, free of charge, through its Internet website (http://www.federalsignal.com) as soon as reasonably practical after it electronically files or furnishes such materials to the SEC. Additionally, the Company makes its proxy statement and its Annual Report to stockholders available at the same internet website (http://www.federalsignal.com), free of charge, when sent to stockholders prior to the meeting date. All of the Company’s filings may be read or copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F. Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.

 

 

We may occasionally make forward-looking statements and estimates such as forecasts and projections of our future performance or statements of our plans and objectives. These forward-looking statements may be contained in, among other things, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including this Annual Report on

Form 10-K, press releases made by us and in oral statements made by our officers. Actual results could differ materially from those contained in such forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ from those contained in such forward-looking statements include, among other things, the risks described below.

 

The execution of our growth strategy is dependent upon the continued availability of credit and third-party financing arrangements for our customers.

 

The recent economic downturn has resulted in tighter credit markets, which could adversely affect our customers’ ability to secure the financing necessary to proceed or continue with purchases of our products and services. Our customers’ or potential customers’ inability to secure financing for projects could result in the delay, cancellation or down-sizing of new purchases or the suspension of purchases already under contract, which could cause a decline in the demand for our products and services and negatively impact our revenues and earnings.

 

We rely on access to financial markets to finance a portion of our working capital requirements and support our liquidity needs. Access to these markets may be adversely affected by factors beyond our control, including turmoil in the financial services industry, volatility in securities trading markets and general economic downturns.

 

We draw upon our revolving credit facility and our operating cash flow to fund working capital needs, capital expenditures, strategic acquisitions, pension contributions, debt repayments, share repurchases and dividends. Market disruptions such as those recently experienced in the United States and abroad have materially impacted liquidity in the credit and debt markets, making financing terms for borrowers less attractive and in certain cases have resulted in the unavailability of certain types of financing. Continued uncertainty in the financial markets may negatively impact our ability to access additional financing or to refinance our existing credit facility or existing debt arrangements on favorable terms or at all, which could negatively affect our ability to fund current and future operations as well as future acquisitions and development. These disruptions may include turmoil in the financial services industry, unprecedented volatility in the markets where our outstanding securities trade, and general economic downturns in the areas where we do business. If we are unable to access monies at competitive rates, or if our short-term or long-term borrowings costs dramatically increase, our ability to finance our operations, meet our short-term obligations and implement our operating strategy could be adversely affected.

 

Our financial results are subject to considerable cyclicality.

 

Our ability to be profitable depends heavily on varying conditions in the United States government and municipal markets and the overall United States economy. The industrial markets in which we compete are subject to considerable cyclicality, and move in response to cycles in the overall business environment. Many of our customers are municipal governmental agencies, and as such, we are dependent on municipal government spending. Spending by our municipal customers can be affected by local political circumstances, budgetary constraints, and other factors. The United States government and municipalities depend heavily on tax revenues as a source of their spending and, accordingly, there is a historical correlation, of a one or two year lag between the overall strength of the United States economy and our sales to the United States government and municipalities. Therefore, downturns in the United States economy are likely to result in decreases in demand for our products. During previous economic downturns, we experienced decreases in sales and profitability, and we expect our business to remain subject to similar economic fluctuations in the future.

 

The inability to obtain raw materials, component parts, and/or finished goods in a timely and cost-effective manner from suppliers would adversely affect our ability to manufacture and market our products.

 

We purchase raw materials and component parts from suppliers to be used in the manufacturing of our products. In addition, we purchase certain finished goods from suppliers. Changes in our relationships with suppliers or increases in the costs of purchased raw materials, component parts or finished goods could result in manufacturing interruptions, delays, inefficiencies or our inability to market products. In addition, our profit margins would decrease if prices of purchased raw materials, component parts or finished goods increase and we are unable to pass on those increases to our customers.

We operate in highly competitive markets.

 

The markets in which we operate are highly competitive. The intensity of this competition, which is expected to continue, can result in price discounting and margin pressures throughout the industry and adversely affects our ability to increase or maintain prices for our products. In addition, certain of our competitors may have lower overall labor or material costs.

 

We have international operations that are subject to foreign economic and political uncertainties.

 

Our business is subject to fluctuations in demand and changing international economic and political conditions which are beyond our control. During 2009, approximately 44% of our sales were to customers outside the United States; with approximately 31% of sales being supplied from our overseas operations. We expect a significant and increasing portion of our revenues and profits to come from international sales for the foreseeable future. Operating in the international marketplace exposes us to a number of risks, including abrupt changes in foreign government policies and regulations and, in some cases, international hostilities. To the extent that our international operations are affected by unexpected and adverse foreign economic and political conditions, we may experience project disruptions and losses which could significantly reduce our revenues and profits.

 

Some of our contracts are denominated in foreign currencies, which result in additional risk of fluctuating currency values and exchange rates, hard currency shortages and controls on currency exchange. Although currency exposure is hedged in the short term, over the longer term changes in the value of foreign currencies could increase our U.S. dollar costs for, or reduce our U.S. dollar revenues from, our foreign operations. Any increased costs or reduced revenues as a result of foreign currency fluctuations could affect our profits.

 

Failure to keep pace with technological developments may adversely affect our operations.

 

We are engaged in an industry which will be affected by future technological developments. The introduction of products or processes utilizing new technologies could render our existing products or processes obsolete or unmarketable. Our success will depend upon our ability to develop and introduce on a timely and cost-effective basis new products, processes and applications that keep pace with technological developments and address increasingly sophisticated customer requirements. We may not be successful in identifying, developing and marketing new products, applications and processes and product or process enhancements. We may experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the successful development, introduction and marketing of product or process enhancements or new products, applications or processes. Our products, applications or processes may not adequately meet the requirements of the marketplace and achieve market acceptance. Our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected if we were to incur delays in developing new products, applications or processes or product or process enhancements or if our products do not gain market acceptance.

 

Our ability to operate effectively could be impaired if we fail to attract and retain key personnel.

 

Our ability to operate our businesses and implement our strategies depends, in part, on the efforts of our executive officers and other key employees. In addition, our future success will depend on, among other factors, our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, including finance personnel, research professionals, technical sales professionals and engineers. The loss of the services of any key employee or the failure to attract or retain other qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business or business prospects.

 

We may incur material losses and costs as a result of product liability, warranty, recall claims or other lawsuits or claims that may be brought against us.

 

We are exposed to product liability and warranty claims in the normal course of business in the event that our products actually or allegedly fail to perform as expected or the use of our products results, or is alleged to result, in bodily injury and/or property damage. Accordingly, we could experience material warranty or product liability costs in the future and incur significant costs to defend against these claims. We carry insurance and maintain reserves for product liability claims. However, we cannot be assured that our insurance coverage will be adequate if such claims do arise, and any liability not covered by insurance could have a material adverse impact on our results

of operations and financial position. A future claim could involve the imposition of punitive damages, the award of which, pursuant to state laws, may not be covered by insurance. In addition, warranty or other claims are not typically covered by insurance coverage. Any product liability or warranty issues may adversely impact our reputation as a manufacturer of high quality, safe products and may have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

The costs associated with complying with environmental and safety regulations could lower our margins.

 

We, like other manufacturers, continue to face heavy governmental regulation of our products, especially in the areas of the environment and employee health and safety. Complying with environmental and safety requirements has added and will continue to add to the cost of our products, and could increase the capital required. While we believe that we are in compliance in all material respects with these laws and regulations, we may be adversely impacted by costs, liabilities or claims with respect to our operations under existing laws or those that may be adopted. These requirements are complex, change frequently and have tended to become more stringent over time. Therefore, we could incur substantial costs, including cleanup costs, fines and civil or criminal sanctions as a result of violations, or liabilities under, environmental laws and safety regulations.

 

We may be required to recognize impairment charges for our goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets.

 

In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, we periodically assess our goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets to determine if they are impaired. Significant negative industry or economic trends, disruptions to our business, unexpected significant changes or planned changes in use of the assets and market capitalization declines may result in impairments to goodwill and other long lived assets. Future impairment charges could significantly affect our results of operations in the periods recognized. Impairment charges would also reduce our consolidated shareholders’ equity and increase our debt-to-total-capitalization ratio, which may result in an event of default on our credit facility and other debt facilities. Upon an event of default, if not waived by our lenders, our lenders may declare all amounts outstanding as due and payable.

 

We are subject to a number of restrictive debt covenants.

 

Our credit facility and other debt instruments contain certain restrictive debt covenants and other customary events of default that may hinder our ability to continue operating or to take advantage of attractive business opportunities. These restrictive covenants include, among other things, an interest coverage ratio of 3.00:1 in all quarters and a maximum debt-to-total-capitalization ratio of 0.5:1.0. Our ability to comply with these restrictive covenants may be affected by the other factors described in this “Risk Factors” section and other factors outside our control. Failure to comply with one or more of these restrictive covenants may result in an event of default. Upon an event of default, if not waived by our lenders, our lenders may declare all amounts outstanding as due and payable. If we are unable to comply with the restrictive covenants in the future, we would be required to obtain further modifications from our lenders or secure another source of financing. If our current lenders accelerate the maturity of our indebtedness, we may not have sufficient capital available at that time to pay the amounts due to our lenders on a timely basis. In addition, these restrictive covenants may prevent us from engaging in transactions that benefit us, including responding to changing business and economic conditions and taking advantage of attractive business opportunities.

 

Our strategy to pursue growth through selective acquisitions may not be successful.

 

Our long-term strategy includes expanding into adjacent markets through selective acquisitions of companies, complementary technologies and organic growth. This strategy may involve the acquisition of companies that enable us to build on our existing strength in a market or that give us access to proprietary technologies that are strategically valuable or allows us to leverage our distribution channels. In connection with this strategy, we could face certain risks and uncertainties in addition to those we face in the day-to-day operations of our business. The acquisitions that we may consider may not be successfully consummated. Our acquisition activities can be disrupted by overtures from competitors for the targeted candidates, governmental regulation and rapid developments in our industry. We may face additional risks and uncertainties following an acquisition including: (i) the difficulty in integrating the newly-acquired business and operations in an efficient and effective manner; (ii) the

inability to achieve strategic objectives, cost savings, expected levels of profitability and other benefits from the acquisition; (iii) the lack of success by the acquired business in its markets; (iv) the loss of key employees of the acquired business; (v) the diversion of the attention of senior management from our operations; and (vi) the liabilities that were not known at the time of the acquisition or the need to address tax or accounting issues. If we fail to timely recognize or address these matters or to devote adequate resources to them, we may fail to achieve our growth strategy or otherwise realize the intended benefits of the acquisition. Even if we are unable to integrate our business operations successfully, the integration may not result in the realization of the full benefits of synergies, cost savings, profitability, innovation and operational efficiencies that may be possible from the integration or that the benefits will be achieved within the forcasted period of time. In addition, our acquisition activities could require us to secure additional debt or equity financing, which we may not be able to secure on favorable terms or at all.

 

Our efforts to develop new products and services or enhance existing products and services involve substantial research, development and marketing expenses, and the resulting new or enhanced products or services may not generate sufficient revenues to justify the expense.

 

We place a high priority on developing new products and services, as well as enhancing our existing products and services. As a result of these efforts, we may be required to expend substantial research, development and marketing resources, and the time and expense required to develop a new product or service or enhance an existing product or service are difficult to predict. We may not succeed in developing, introducing or marketing new products or services or product or service enhancements. In addition, we cannot be certain that any new or enhanced product or service will generate sufficient revenue to justify the expense and resources devoted to this product diversification effort.

 

 

None.

 

 

As of December 31, 2009, the Company utilized 8 principal manufacturing plants located throughout North America, as well as 9 in Europe, 1 in South Africa and 1 in the Far East.

 

In total, the Company devoted approximately 1.1 million square feet to manufacturing and 0.7 million square feet to service, warehousing and office space as of December 31, 2009. Of the total square footage, approximately 43% is devoted to the Safety and Security Systems Group, 9% to the Fire Rescue Group and 48% to the Environmental Solutions Group. Approximately 18% of the total square footage is owned by the Company with the remaining 82% being leased.

 

All of the Company’s properties, as well as the related machinery and equipment, are considered to be well-maintained, suitable and adequate for their intended purposes. In the aggregate, these facilities are of sufficient capacity for the Company’s current business needs.

 

 

The information concerning the Company’s legal proceedings included in Note 15 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained under Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise during the three months ended December 31, 2009.

 

The following is a list of the Company’s executive officers, their ages, business experience and positions and offices as of February 1, 2010:

 

William H. Osborne, age 49, was appointed Chief Executive Officer and President in September 2008 and elected to the Board of Directors in April 2009. Mr. Osborne was President and Chief Executive Officer of Ford of Australia in 2008. From 2005 to 2008 Mr. Osborne was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Ford of Canada and from 2003 to 2005 he was the Executive Director, Pickup Truck and Commercial Vehicles, North American Truck Business of Ford Motor Company.

 

William G. Barker, III, age 51, was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in December 2008. Mr. Barker was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sun-Times Media Group from 2007 to 2008. He was Vice President, Finance and Strategy, Gatorade of PepsiCo, Inc. from 2001 to 2007.

 

David E. Janek, age 46, was appointed Vice President and Controller in August 2008. Mr. Janek was Vice President and Treasurer from 2006 to 2008 and was Vice President Finance, Safety and Security Systems Group from 2002 to 2006.

 

Fred H. Lietz, age 54, was appointed Vice President and Chief Procurement Officer in May 2007. Mr. Lietz was Vice President of Global Procurement and Logistics at Andrew Corporation from 2001 to 2006.

 

Esa Peltola, age 58, was appointed President of Bronto Skylift Oy Ab in July 2007. Mr. Peltola was Managing Director of Bronto Skylift from 1998 to 2007.

 

Jennifer L. Sherman, age 45, was appointed Senior Vice President, Human Resources, General Counsel and Secretary in April 2008. Ms. Sherman was Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from 2004 to 2007 and was Deputy General Counsel and Assistant Secretary from 1998 to 2004.

 

Mark D. Weber, age 52, was appointed President of the Environmental Solutions Group in April 2003. Mr. Weber was Vice President Sweeper Products for the Environmental Solutions Group from 2002 to 2003 and General Manager of Elgin Sweeper Company from 2001 to 2002.

 

These officers hold office until the next annual meeting of the Board of Directors following their election and until their successors have been elected and qualified.

 

There are no family relationships among any of the foregoing executive officers.

 

 

 

The Company’s common stock is listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol FSS. At December 31, 2009, there were no material restrictions on the Company’s ability to pay dividends. The information concerning the Company’s market price range data included in Note 19 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained under Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.

 

As of January 31, 2010, there were 2,556 holders of record of the Company’s common stock.

The graph below matches Federal Signal Corporation’s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the Russell 2000 index, the S&P Industrials index, and the S&P Midcap 400 index. The graph tracks the performance of a $100 investment in our common stock and in each index (with the reinvestment of all dividends) from December 31, 2004 to December 31, 2009.

 

Comparison of 5 Year Cumulative Total Return*

 

Among Federal Signal Corporation. The Russell 2000 Index,

The S&P Midcap 400 Index and the S&P Industrials Index

 

 

*$100 invested on 12/31/04 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending December 31.

 

Copyright ^© 2010 S&P, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.

 

 

The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. Notwithstanding anything set forth in any of our previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, which might be incorporated into future filings in whole or part, including this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the preceding performance graph shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any such findings.

 

The information concerning the Company’s quarterly dividend per share data included in Note 19 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained under Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference. The payment of future dividends is at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors and will depend, among other things, upon future earnings and cash flows, capital requirements, the Company’s general financial condition, general business conditions and other factors. Accordingly, the Company’s Board of Directors may at any time reduce or eliminate the Company’s quarterly dividend based on these factors.

 

The following table presents the selected financial information of the Company as of, and for each of the five years in the period ended, December 31:

 

 

 

 

The 2009 and 2008 income before income taxes includes restructuring costs of $1.5 million and $2.7 million, respectively. The 2008 income before income taxes was impacted by a $6.9 million loss incurred to settle a dispute and write off assets associated with a large parking systems contract and a $13.0 million loss associated with the Company’s decision to terminate funding of a joint venture in China (“China Joint Venture”). 2009 operating income benefitted from $5.8 million in lower legal and trial costs associated with the Company’s ongoing firefighter hearing loss litigation. The 2005 loss before income taxes was impacted by a $6.7 million gain on the sale of two industrial lighting product lines.

 

The selected financial data set forth above should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, including the notes thereto, contained under Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K and Item 7 of Part II of this Form 10-K.

 

The information concerning the Company’s selected quarterly data included in Note 19 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained under Item 8 of this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

The Company designs and manufactures a suite of products and integrated solutions for municipal, governmental, industrial and commercial customers. Federal Signal’s products include safety and security systems, vacuum loader vehicles, street sweepers, truck mounted aerial platforms and waterblasters. Due to technology, marketing, distribution and product application synergies, the Company’s business units are organized and managed in three operating segments: Safety and Security Systems, Fire Rescue and Environmental Solutions. The information concerning the Company’s manufacturing businesses included in Item 1 of this Form 10-K and Note 16 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained under Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K are incorporated herein by reference.

 

Results of Operations

 

Operating results have been restated to exclude the following operations discontinued during 2009: all RAVO businesses formerly reported within the Environmental Solutions Group segment, and all Pauluhn businesses formerly reported within the Safety and Security Systems Group segment. Information relating to each of these discontinued operations is presented in Note 13 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained under Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

 

Orders and backlog

 

 

Orders in 2009 fell 26% compared to 2008 reflecting weakness across all segments and most markets due to the global economic recession. U.S. municipal and government orders decreased 14% in 2009 primarily as a result of decreased orders of sewer cleaners of $16.8 million, first responder products of $9.5 million, sweepers of $5.2 million, and a $5.5 million decline in outdoor warning systems. U.S. industrial and commercial orders decreased 38% driven by a $51.5 million reduction in orders for vacuum trucks and a $12.8 million reduction in orders for Safety and Security Systems products. Non-U.S. orders decreased 28% as compared to prior year primarily due to a decrease in Bronto aerial platforms of approximately $63.1 million and a $26.0 million decline in Safety and Security Systems products. Non-U.S. orders declined 26% when excluding the effect of unfavorable foreign currency translation.

 

U.S. municipal and government orders decreased 12% in 2008 primarily as a result of decreased orders of sweepers of $22.3 million, sewer cleaners of $13.1 million and a $12.3 million decline in police products offset by

an increase in automated license plate recognition (“ALPR”) cameras of $6.1 million. U.S. industrial and commercial orders decreased 8% driven by lower orders for sweepers and vacuum trucks of $21.2 million and a reduction in parking system orders of $6.1 million, offset by an increase in Bronto aerial platforms of $4.7 million. Non-U.S. orders remained relatively flat as compared to prior year with increases in ALPR cameras of $15.1 million and European sweeper orders and water blasters of $1.3 million, offset by a decrease in Bronto aerial platforms of $16.6 million.

 

Consolidated results of operations

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s results of operations and selected operating metrics for each of the three years in the period ended December 31 ($ in millions, except per share amounts):

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2009 vs. December 31, 2008

 

Net sales decreased 14% or $126.5 million over 2008 as a direct result of a decrease in volume as the global economic recession reduced demand for the Company’s products across most market segments. Unfavorable foreign currency movement, most notably a stronger U.S. dollar versus European currencies in the comparable prior year periods reduced sales by 1%. Gross profit margins fell in 2009 to 25.7% from 26.7%. Operating income decreased by 34% in 2009 due to lower sales volumes offset in part by lower spending in both fixed manufacturing and SG&A of $29.6 million. Included in operating expenses in 2009 is a $0.7 million charge related to an environmental remediation issue at the Company’s Pearland, Texas site. Operating income also benefitted from the absence of $6.9 million in charges to settle a dispute and write off assets associated with a parking systems contract and $5.8 million in lower legal and trial costs associated with the Company’s ongoing firefighter hearing loss litigation.

 

Interest expense decreased 25% from 2008, primarily due to lower interest rates and lower average borrowings in 2009 from a reduction in net debt of $65.0 million. The Company paid down debt using net proceeds of $11.9 million from the sale of RAVO and $34.0 million from the sale of its Pauluhn business. For further discussion of the discontinued operations, see Note 13 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained under Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K.

 

In 2009, the Company recorded a gain of $1.2 million associated with the shutdown of the China Joint Venture which is related to the sale of the remaining assets of the business. In 2008, losses on the Company’s investment in

the China Joint Venture totaled $13.0 million. The Company’s share of operating losses was $0 in 2009 and $2.6 million in 2008. A charge of $10.4 million was taken in 2008 to reflect the Company’s contingent obligations to guarantee the debt of the joint venture and to guarantee the investment of one of its joint venture partners. A review of the market and forecasts of the joint venture’s cash flows indicated its bank debt was unlikely to be repaid and it was unlikely to provide a return to the joint venture partners. In 2009, the partners agreed to voluntarily liquidate the China Joint Venture.

 

Other expenses of $0.5 million include realized losses from foreign currency transactions and on derivatives contracts.

 

The 2009 effective tax rate on income from continuing operations increased to 20.6% from (31.4)% in the prior year. The 2008 rate benefited from a capital loss utilization tax strategy on a sale/leaseback of real estate properties, the China Joint Venture shutdown tax benefits, and a higher mix of profits in lower taxed countries.

 

The Company’s 2009 effective rate of 20.6% reflects a benefit for the reduction in FIN 48 reserves primarily due to the completion of an audit of the Company’s 2006 U.S. tax return in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 740, “Income Taxes” (FIN 48). The Company’s effective rate also reflects benefits for the R&D tax credit and foreign tax rate effects.

 

Income from continuing operations decreased 35% from 2008 due to lower operating income as described above and a higher effective tax rate, offset by the benefits of lower interest expense of $3.9 million and other expense of $0.3 million.

 

Net income was $23.1 million in 2009 versus a net loss of $95.0 million in 2008. In 2009, there was an after-tax gain from discontinued operations of $5.4 million relating to the sale of the Company’s RAVO and Pauluhn businesses. Net losses from discontinued operations totaled $122.2 million in 2008 relating primarily to the impairment of assets and sale of the Company’s Die and Mold Operations and E-ONE. The Company also discontinued its financial services activities during 2008 which generated income of $0.3 million. For further discussion of the discontinued operations, see Note 13 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained under Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K.

 

Year Ended December 31, 2008 vs. December 31, 2007

 

Net sales in 2008 increased 3% over 2007, or 2% after removing the favorable effects of currency translation from a weaker U.S. dollar. Sales volume increases at Fire Rescue were largely offset by reductions at Environmental Solutions, Safety and Security Systems were relatively flat (see segment discussions below). Gross profit margins fell slightly in 2008 to 26.7% from 27.0% due largely to the absence of a favorable $1.8 million excise tax settlement which occurred in 2007. Operating income decreased by 28% in 2008 as the gross profit increase of $4.4 million was more than offset by an increase of $20.6 million of operating expenses due to $9.9 million of higher legal costs associated with the Company’s ongoing firefighter hearing loss litigation, $6.2 million of increased charges to settle a dispute and write off assets associated with a parking systems contract and $2.7 million of restructuring costs largely due to severance associated with streamlining the management structure.

 

Interest expense decreased 17% from 2007 primarily due to lower average borrowings in 2008 from a reduction in net debt of $30.7 million. The Company paid down debt mostly by using net proceeds of $59.9 million from the sale of its Tool Group businesses and $35.8 million from the sale-leaseback of its Elgin and University Park, Illinois plants. For further discussion of the discontinued operations, see Note 13 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained under Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K.

 

Losses on the Company’s China Joint Venture totaled $13.0 million in 2008. The Company’s share of operating losses was $2.6 million in 2008 versus $3.3 million in 2007. A charge of $10.4 million was taken in 2008 to reflect the Company’s contingent obligations to guaranty the debt of the joint venture and to guaranty the investment of one of its joint venture partners.

 

Other expenses of $0.8 million include realized losses from foreign currency transactions and on derivatives contracts.

The 2008 effective tax rate on income from continuing operations decreased to (31.4)% from 25.4% in the prior year. The 2008 rate benefited from a capital loss utilization tax strategy on a sale/leaseback of real estate properties, the China Joint Venture shutdown tax benefits, and a higher mix of profits in lower taxed countries.

 

Income from continuing operations decreased 23% from 2007 primarily as a result of the aforementioned changes in operating expenses, loss on joint venture and offsetting tax benefits.

 

Net loss was $95.0 million in 2008 versus net income of $54.7 million in 2007. Net losses from discontinued operations totaled $122.2 million in 2008 relating primarily to the impairment of assets and sale of the Company’s Die and Mold Operations and E-ONE. The Company also discontinued its financial services activities during 2008 which generated income of $0.3 million. A net gain of $19.6 million on discontinued operations in 2007 resulted primarily from the sale of the Cutting Tool Operations in that year. For further discussion of the discontinued operations, see Note 13 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained under Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K.

 

Safety and Security Systems Operations

 

The following table presents the Safety and Security Systems Group’s results of operations for each of the three years in the period ended December 31 ($ in millions):

 

 

Orders declined 19% as compared to the prior year period with declines in most market segments with the exception of automated license plate recognition (“ALPR”) cameras in the U.S., primarily as a result of the economic recession. U.S. orders decreased 15% due to softness in oil and gas markets and decline in municipal spending due to the global economic recession. 2009 orders in the U.S. decreased $10.5 million for warning systems, $8.6 million for police products, $8.3 million for industrial signal and communication systems, and $4.5 million for parking systems, offset by an increase of $5.4 million in ALPR cameras. Non-U.S. orders decreased 23% compared to 2008 primarily due to a decline in vehicular lighting and siren sales of $21.0 million.

 

Net sales decreased 15% as compared to 2008 with decreases across all businesses except warning systems, which increased $1.6 million driven by international and military segments, and ALPR cameras in the U.S. Operating income in 2009 declined 22% as a result of lower sales volumes and a charge of $0.7 million related to an environmental remediation issue at the Company’s Pearland, Texas site. Operating expenses were lower than the prior year by $15.3 million driven by cost management initiatives implemented in 2009 and the absence of $5.3 million in charges in 2008 to settle a dispute and write-off assets associated with a parking system contract. Operating margins declined 8% compared to the prior year as a result of the lower sales volumes.

 

Orders remained relatively flat in 2008 as compared to 2007. U.S. orders decreased 6% due to weak municipal spending and a relative softening in the industrial economy compared to 2007. For 2008, orders in the U.S. fell $12.3 million for police products, $6.1 million for parking systems, and $0.7 million for hazardous area lighting products. Partly offsetting these declines was an increase in orders of $6.1 million for ALPR cameras made by PIPS Technologies, which was acquired in the third quarter of 2007. Non-U.S. orders in 2008 increased 9% over the prior year or 6% when excluding the favorable effects of currency translation due to strength in outdoor warning systems and the addition of PIPS Technologies acquired in 2007.

 

Net sales increased 2% in 2008. An increase in shipments of ALPR cameras during 2008 of $19.2 million and industrial communications systems of $2.4 million was offset by a $17.7 million decrease in global vehicular lighting and siren sales. Operating income in 2008 declined 20% and operating margins fell, primarily due to $6.2 million of increased charges to settle a dispute and write off assets associated with a parking system contract, $1.8 million of employee severance costs associated with restructuring initiatives, and $0.8 million associated with other cost reduction initiatives.

Fire Rescue Operations

 

The following table presents the Fire Rescue Group’s results of operations for each of the three years in the period ended December 31 ($ in millions):

 

 

Orders in 2009 decreased 40% from the prior year as the global economic recession reduced demand for the Company’s products in both fire-lift and industrial markets was weak in all regions.

 

Net sales in 2009 increased 10% and 14% excluding currency translation, compared to the prior year. Unusually high backlog at the end of 2008 and the recent plant expansion enabled strong shipment levels especially during the fourth quarter despite the reduction in orders. Operating income and margin increased 85% and 70% respectively, due to the increase in sales volumes and also due to margin improvements related to the plant expansion and process improvements.

 

Orders in 2008 decreased 7% compared to 2007 or 15% when excluding the favorable effects of currency translation. Bronto’s entire order decline existed within its industrial markets, primarily with weakness in Europe.

 

Net sales in 2008 increased 23% from 2007 or 19% when excluding the favorable effects of currency translation. Bronto’s large backlog, which exceeded 12 months of shipments at the end of 2007, allowed for strong shipments in 2008 despite a reduction in orders during the year.

 

Operating income rose 32% in 2008 and operating margins improved as a result of the increased sales volumes. Higher product costs for steel and other components and inefficiencies caused by the plant expansion offset some of the sales volume impact.

 

Environmental Solutions Operations

 

The following table presents the Environmental Solutions Group’s results of operations for each of the three years in the period ended December 31 ($ in millions):

 

 

Orders of $265.4 million in 2009 were 26% below the prior year due to the global economic recession and reduced municipal and industrial spending. U.S. orders decreased 30% in 2009 from the prior year driven by a $71.3 million reduction in sewer cleaning and industrial vacuum trucks, a $9.0 million reduction in water blasters and an $8.4 million reduction in sweepers. Non-U.S. orders decreased 5% due to a weaker market environment for sweepers.

 

Net sales decreased 23% compared to the prior year period on lower sales volume in sewer cleaning and industrial vacuum trucks of $61.3 million, street sweepers of $16.4 million and waterblasters of $9.7 million. The flow through of the decline in sales volume resulted in a $20.0 million reduction in operating income and a lower operating margin.

 

In 2008, orders decreased 12% from 2007 as weak municipal and industrial markets drove a $25.6 million reduction in sweepers and a $26.7 million reduction in sewer cleaning and industrial vacuum trucks offset by an increase of $5.8 million in waterblasters. Net sales in 2008 compared to 2007 decreased 2% as a decline in U.S sweeper shipments of $23.6 million more than offset a $13.6 million increase in global shipments of sewer cleaning and industrial vacuum trucks.

Operating income decreased 8% in 2008 due to lower sales volumes and the absence of a favorable $1.8 million excise tax settlement which occurred in 2007.

 

Corporate Expense

 

Corporate expenses totaled $28.6 million in 2009, $30.7 million in 2008 and $21.1 million in 2007. The 7% decrease in 2009 is due to $5.8 million in lower legal and trial costs associated with the Company’s ongoing firefighter hearing loss litigation offset by $2.6 million associated with the costs for a proxy contest initiated by an activist shareholder. Other offsetting amounts include higher bonus costs of approximately $1.2 million.

 

The 45% increase in 2008 expense is primarily due to $9.9 million of higher legal costs associated with the Company’s ongoing firefighter hearing loss litigation and $1.5 million of costs associated with the hiring of a new chief executive officer and chief financial officer, reduced by lower bonus and stock-based compensation costs of $1.8 million.

 

The hearing loss litigation has historically been managed by the Company’s legal staff resident at the corporate office and not by management at any reporting segment. In accordance with ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting” (SFAS No. 131), which provides that segment reporting should follow the management of the item and that some expenses can be corporate expenses, these legal expenses (which are unusual and not part of the normal operating activities of any of our operating segments), are reported and managed as corporate expenses. Only the Company, and no current or divested subsidiaries is a named party to these lawsuits.

 

Legal Matters

 

The Company has been sued by over 2,500 firefighters in numerous separate cases alleging that exposure to the Company’s sirens impaired their hearing. The Company contests the allegations. Over 100 cases have been dismissed in Cook County including 27 by way of verdict. The Company continues to aggressively defend the matter. For further details regarding this and other legal matters, refer to Note 15 in the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K.

 

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

During each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, the Company used its cash flows from operations to pay cash dividends to shareholders, to fund growth, and to make capital investments that both sustain and reduce the cost of its operations. Beyond these uses, remaining cash was used to fund acquisitions, pay down debt, repurchase shares of common stock and make voluntary pension contributions.

 

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents totaled $21.1 million, $23.4 million and $12.5 million as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The following table summarizes the Company’s cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31 ($ in millions):

 

Operating cash flow decreased $61.3 million in 2009 compared to 2008. The decrease in 2009 was driven by a $127.0 million decrease in cash from discontinued operating activities offset by an increase of $65.7 million in cash provided by continuing operating activities. In 2009 the Company discontinued its RAVO and Pauluhn businesses and in 2008, the Company discontinued its Die and Mold Operations, E-ONE business and Financial Services activities which generated cash of $126.2 million during the year. In 2008, approximately 92% of the Company’s municipal leases were sold for net cash proceeds of approximately $94.0 million. The increase in cash provided by continuing operations of $65.7 million in 2009 was caused primarily by a decrease in accounts receivable and inventories, lower pension contributions and a gain on the China Joint Venture due to the liquidation of assets.

 

Proceeds from the sale of properties, plant and equipment in 2008 are primarily the result of net cash proceeds of $35.8 million received from a sale-leaseback of the Company’s Elgin and University Park, Illinois plants.

 

Capital expenditures decreased $13.4 million in 2009 compared to 2008 due primarily to the expansion of the Company’s plants in Pori, Finland and in Streator, Illinois that occurred in 2008. Capital expenditures rose $8.5 million in 2008 from 2007 again largely due to these plant expansions.

 

In 2009, the Company acquired Diamond Consulting Services Ltd. for $13.5 million in cash. See Note 11 of the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the acquisition. The Company funded the acquisition through cash provided by operations, and from proceeds received from the sale of RAVO and Pauluhn businesses, included in discontinued operations in 2009, and sold for net proceeds of $45.1 million in cash. See Note 13 of the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the sale of RAVO and Pauluhn busineses.

 

In 2008, the Company divested its Die and Mold Operations and E-ONE business for net cash proceeds of $59.9 million and a payment of $0.6 million, respectively. Gross proceeds from the sale of E-ONE were $3.4 million, of which $0.5 million had been received at December 31, 2008.

 

In 2009, net borrowings decreased $77.7 million, largely upon paydowns upon the receipt of cash from the RAVO and Pauluhn businesses included in discontinued operations in 2009. In 2008, net borrowings decreased $20.1 million, largely upon receipt of cash from the aforementioned sale of its municipal leasing portfolio which was included in discontinued operations in 2008 and the aforementioned sale leaseback transactions. In 2007, net borrowings increased $59.6 million due to the acquisition of PIPS Technologies in the second half of the year.

 

Payments for discontinued financing activities of $129.3 million in 2008 reflect the repayment of financial service borrowings as a result of the Company’s decision to exit the municipal lease financing business.

 

On April 27, 2009, the Company executed the Global Amendment to Note Purchase Agreements (the “Global Amendment”) with the holders of its private placement debt notes (the “Notes”). The Global Amendment included a provision allowing the Company to prepay $50.0 million of principal of the $173.4 million Notes outstanding at par with no prepayment penalty. The prepayment was executed on April 28, 2009, and included principal, related accrued interest and a fee of $0.2 million totaling $51.1 million. The prepayment was funded by the Company’s available capacity under its revolving credit facility.

 

The Global Amendment included changes to the Notes’ coupon interest rates. The coupon interest rates on the Notes were increased by 100 basis points upon execution of the Global Amendment. On January 1, 2010, the outstanding Notes’ coupon interest rates will increase by an additional 100 basis points. On April 1, 2010, the outstanding Notes’ coupon interest rates will increase an additional 200 basis points if the Company’s private placement debt rating does not improve by one rating level on or before this date.

 

The Global Amendment also included changes and additions to various covenants within the Note Agreements. Financial covenants were modified to more closely align with those included in the Company’s revolving credit facility agreement, which allows for the exclusion of various charges when computing covenants for minimum net worth and maximum debt to capitalization.

 

Aggregate maturities of total borrowings amount to approximately $41.9 million in 2010, $10.5 million in 2011, $144.6 million in 2012 and $7.1 million in 2013. The fair values of these borrowings aggregated $204.9 million and $286.3 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Included in 2010 maturities is $2.5 million of other foreign lines of credit and $39.4 million of private placement debt.

In March 2008, the Company executed an amendment (the “Second Credit Amendment”) to the Revolving Credit Facility. The Second Credit Amendment modified the definitions of Consolidated Net Worth and EBIT, reduced the Total Indebtedness to Capital ratio maximum to 0.50, reduced the minimum Interest Coverage Ratio requirement and reduced the required minimum percentage of consolidated assets directly owned by the Credit Agreement’s borrower and guarantors to 50%. The amendment also allowed for the unencumbered sale of the E-One business.

 

In April, 2007, the Company amended its Revolving Credit Agreement. This Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“Credit Agreement”) provides for borrowings of $250.0 million and matures April, 2012. It also allows the Company to borrow up to $35 million in an alternative currency under the swing line provision. As of December 31, 2009, $16.2 million was drawn on the Alternative Currency Facility and $85.0 million was drawn on the Second Credit Amendment for a total of $101.2 million drawn under the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement leaving available borrowings of $148.8 million.

 

Cash dividends paid to shareholders in 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $11.7 million, $11.5 million and $11.5 million respectively. The Company declared dividends of $0.24 per share in 2009, 2008 and 2007.

 

During 2008, the Company completed repurchases totaling $6.0 million of stock under share repurchase programs approved by the Board of Directors to offset the dilutive effects of stock-based compensation.

 

Total debt net of cash and short-term investments included in continuing operations was $180.5 million representing 35% of total capitalization at December 31, 2009 versus $245.5 million or 46% of total capitalization at December 31, 2008. The decrease in the percentage of debt to total capitalization in 2009 was due to a reduction in debt of $77.7 million and an increase in equity of $41.6 million. The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants throughout 2009 and 2008.

 

The Company anticipates that capital expenditures for 2010 will approximate $16 million and that its financial resources and major sources of liquidity, including cash flow from operations and borrowing capacity, will be adequate to meet its operating and capital needs in addition to its financial commitments.

 

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

 

The following table presents a summary of the Company’s contractual obligations and payments due by period as of December 31, 2009 ($ in millions):

 

 

 

 

The Company is party to various interest rate swap agreements in conjunction with the management of borrowing costs. As of December 31, 2009, the fair value of the Company’s net position would result in cash payments of $0.5 million. Future changes in the U.S. interest rate environment would correspondingly affect the fair value and ultimate settlement of the contracts.

 

The Company also enters into foreign currency forward contracts to protect against the variability in exchange rates on cash flows and intercompany transactions with its foreign subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2009, there is $0.1 million unrealized losses on the Company’s foreign exchange contracts. Volatility in the future exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and Euro, Canadian dollar and British pound will impact the final settlement of any of these contracts.

The following table presents a summary of the Company’s commercial commitments and the notional amount by expiration period as of December 31, 2009 ($ in millions):

 

 

Financial standby letters of credit largely relate to casualty insurance policies for the Company’s workers’ compensation, automobile, general liability and product liability policies. Performance standby letters of credit represent guarantees of performance by foreign subsidiaries that engage in cross-border transactions with foreign customers.

 

Purchase obligations relate to commercial chassis.

 

As of December 31, 2009, the Company has a liability of approximately $5.8 million for unrecognized tax benefits (refer to Note 6). Due to the uncertainties related to these tax matters, the Company cannot make a reasonably reliable estimate of the period of cash settlement for this liability.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company considers the following policies to be the most critical in understanding the judgments that are involved in the preparation of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and the uncertainties that could impact the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

Allowances for Doubtful Accounts

 

The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers. The Company’s policy is to establish, on a quarterly basis, allowances for doubtful accounts based on factors such as historical loss trends, credit quality of the present portfolio, collateral value and general economic conditions. If the historical loss trend increased or decreased 10% in 2009, the Company’s operating income would have decreased or increased by $0.1 million, respectively. Though management considers the valuation of the allowances proper and adequate, changes in the economy and/or deterioration of the financial condition of the Company’s customers could affect the reserve balances required.

 

Inventory Reserve

 

The Company performs ongoing evaluations to ensure that reserves for excess and obsolete inventory are properly identified and recorded. The reserve balance includes both specific and general reserves. Specific reserves at 100% are established for identifiable obsolete products and materials. General reserves for materials and finished goods are established based upon formulas which reference, among other things, the level of current inventory relative to recent usage, estimated scrap value and the level of estimated future usage. Historically, this reserve policy has given a close approximation of the Company’s experience with excess and obsolete inventory. The Company does not foresee a need to revise its reserve policy in the future. However, from time to time unusual buying patterns or shifts in demand may cause large movements in the reserve balance.

Warranty Reserve

 

The Company’s products generally carry express warranties that provide repairs at no cost to the customer. The length of the warranty term depends on the product sold, but generally extends from six months to five years based on terms that are generally accepted in the Company’s marketplaces. Certain components necessary to manufacture the Company’s vehicles (including chassis, engines and transmissions) are covered under an original manufacturers’ warranty. Such manufacturers’ warranties are extended directly to end customers.

 

The Company accrues its estimated exposure to warranty claims at the time of sale based upon historical warranty claim costs as a percentage of sales. Management reviews these estimates on a quarterly basis and adjusts the warranty provisions as actual experience differs from historical estimates. Infrequently, a material warranty issue can arise which is outside the norm of the Company’s historical experience; costs related to such issues, if any, are provided for when they become probable and estimable.

 

The Company’s warranty costs as a percentage of net sales totaled 1.2% in 2009, 0.9% in 2008 and 0.8% in 2007. The increase in the rate in 2009 is primarily due to increased costs in the Environmental Solutions Group. Management believes the reserve recorded at December 31, 2009 is appropriate. A 10% increase or decrease in the estimated warranty costs in 2009 would have decreased or increased operating income by $0.9 million, respectively.

 

Workers’ Compensation and Product Liability Reserves

 

Due to the nature of the products manufactured, the Company is subject to product liability claims in the ordinary course of business. The Company is partially self-funded for workers’ compensation and product liability claims with various retention and excess coverage thresholds. After the claim is filed, an initial liability is estimated, if any is expected, to resolve the claim. This liability is periodically updated as more claim facts become known. The establishment and update of liabilities for unpaid claims, including claims incurred but not reported, is based on the assessment by the Company’s claim administrator of each claim, an independent actuarial valuation of the nature and severity of total claims and management’s estimate. The Company utilizes a third-party claims administrator to pay claims, track and evaluate actual claims experience and ensure consistency in the data used in the actuarial valuation. Management believes that the reserve established at December 31, 2009 appropriately reflects the Company’s risk exposure. The Company has not established a reserve for potential losses resulting from hearing loss litigation (see Note 15 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K). If the Company is not successful in its defense after exhausting all appellate options, it will record a charge for such claims, to the extent they exceed insurance recoveries, at the appropriate time.

 

Goodwill

 

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired business over the amounts assigned to the net assets. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment at a reporting unit level on an annual basis or if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.

 

Goodwill is tested for impairment based on a two-step test. The first step, used to identify potential impairment, compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired, thus the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test shall be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

 

Significant judgment is applied when goodwill is assessed for impairment. This judgment includes developing cash flow projections, selecting appropriate discount rates, identifying relevant market comparables, incorporating general economic and market conditions and selecting an appropriate control premium. The income approach is based on discounted cash flows which are derived from internal forecasts and economic expectations for each respective reporting unit. The Company had no goodwill impairments in 2009, 2008 or 2007. The fair values of the

reporting units exceeded their respective carrying amounts by 10% or more, except at the Environmental Solutions Group reporting unit. The fair value of the Environmental Solutions Group reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by 4%. The Environmental Solutions Group reporting unit’s goodwill is $120.4 million. Adverse changes to the Company’s business environment and future cash flows could cause us to record impairment charges in future periods which could be material. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this form 10-K for a summary of the Company’s goodwill.

 

Indefinite lived Intangible Assets

 

An intangible asset determined to have an indefinite useful life is not amortized until its useful life is determined to be no longer indefinite. Indefinite lived intangible assets are evaluated each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life. These assets are tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The impairment test consists of a comparison of the fair value of the indefinite lived intangible asset with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of an intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

 

Significant judgment is applied when evaluating if an intangible asset has a finite useful life. In addition, for indefinite lived intangible assets, significant judgment is applied in testing for impairment. This judgment includes developing cash flow projections, selecting appropriate discount rates, identifying relevant market comparables, and incorporating general economic and market conditions. The Company had no impairments of indefinite lived intangible assets in 2009, 2008 or 2007. Adverse changes to the Company’s business environment and future cash flows could cause us to record impairment charges in future periods which could be material. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this form 10-K for a summary of the Company’s indefinite lived intangible assets.

 

Postretirement Benefits

 

The Company sponsors domestic and foreign defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. Major assumptions used in the accounting for these employee benefit plans include the discount rate, expected return on plan assets and rate of increase in employee compensation levels. A change in any of these assumptions would have an effect on net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs.

 

The following table summarizes the impact that a change in these assumptions would have on the Company’s operating income ($ in millions):

 

 

The weighted-average discount rate used to measure pension liabilities and costs is set by reference to published high-quality bond indices. However, these indices give only an indication of the appropriate discount rate because the cash flows of the bonds comprising the indices do not match the projected benefit payment stream of the plan precisely. For this reason, we also consider the individual characteristics of the plan, such as projected cash flow patterns and payment durations, when setting the discount rate. The weighted-average discount rate used to measure U.S. pension liabilities decreased from 6.5% in 2008 to 6.0% in 2009. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

 

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

 

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Compensation — Stock Compensation” (SFAS No. 123(R)), which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options and restricted stock, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their respective

grant date fair values. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of the stock option awards. The Black-Scholes model requires the use of highly subjective and complex assumptions, including the Company’s stock price, expected volatility, expected term, risk-free interest rate and expected dividend yield. For expected volatility, we base the assumption on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The expected term of the awards is based on historical data regarding employees’ option exercise behaviors. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based on observed interest rates appropriate for the terms of the awards. The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s history and expectation of dividend payouts. In addition to the requirement for fair value estimates, ASC Topic 718 (SFAS No. 123(R)) also requires the recording of expense that is net of an anticipated forfeiture rate. Therefore, only expenses associated with awards that are ultimately expected to vest are included in our financial statements. Our forfeiture rate is determined based on our historical option cancellation experience.

 

We evaluate the Black-Scholes assumptions that we use to value our awards on a quarterly basis. With respect to the forfeiture rate, we revise the rate if actual forfeitures differ from our estimates. If factors change and we employ different assumptions, stock-based compensation expense related to future stock-based payments may differ significantly from estimates recorded in prior periods.

 

Financial Market Risk Management

 

The Company is subject to market risk associated with changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. To mitigate this risk, the Company utilizes interest rate swaps and foreign currency forward contracts. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes and is not party to leveraged derivatives contracts.

 

Interest Rate Risk

 

The Company manages its exposure to interest rate movements by targeting a proportionate relationship between fixed-rate debt to total debt generally within percentages between 40% and 60%. The Company uses funded fixed-rate borrowings as well as interest rate swap agreements to balance its overall fixed/floating interest rate mix.

 

The following table presents the principal cash flows and weighted average interest rates by year of maturity for the Company’s total debt obligations held at December 31, 2009 ($ in millions):

 

 

The following table presents notional amounts and weighted average interest rates by expected (contractual) maturity date for the Company’s interest rate swap contracts held at December 31, 2009 ($ in millions). Notional amounts are used to calculate the contractual payments to be exchanged under the contract. Weighted average variable rates are based on implied forward rates in the yield curve at the reporting date.

 

 

See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K for a description of these agreements. A 100 basis point increase or decrease in variable interest rates in 2009 would have increased or decreased interest expense by $0.9 million, respectively.

Foreign Exchange Rate Risk

 

Although the majority of sales, expenses and cash flows are transacted in U.S. dollars, the Company has exposure to changes in foreign exchange rates, primarily the Euro and British pound. If average annual foreign exchange rates collectively weakened against the U.S. dollar by 10%, pre-tax earnings in 2009 would have decreased by $1.2 million from foreign currency translation.

 

The Company has foreign currency exposures related to buying and selling in currencies other than the local currency in which it operates. The Company utilizes foreign currency options and forward contracts to manage these risks.

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s foreign currency derivative instruments as of December 31, 2009. All are expected to settle in 2010 ($ in millions):

 

 

See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K for a description of these agreements.

 

Forward exchange contracts are recorded as a natural hedge when the hedged item is a recorded asset or liability that is revalued each accounting period, in accordance with ASC Topic 830, “Foreign Currency Matters” (SFAS No. 52). For derivatives designated as natural hedges, changes in fair values are reported in the “Other income (expense)” line of the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

Other Matters

 

The Company has a business conduct policy applicable to all employees and regularly monitors compliance with that policy. The Company has determined that it had no significant related party transactions in each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009.

 

 

The information contained under the caption Financial Market Risk Management included in Item 7 of this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.

 

FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION

 

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Federal Signal Corporation

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Federal Signal Corporation as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Federal Signal Corporation at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

 

As discussed in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, on January 1, 2007, Federal Signal Corporation changed its method of accounting for uncertain tax positions to conform with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.”

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Federal Signal Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 26, 2010, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

Ernst & Young LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

February 26, 2010

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

of Federal Signal Corporation

 

We have audited Federal Signal Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Federal Signal Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, Federal Signal Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the COSO criteria.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009 of Federal Signal Corporation and our report dated February 26, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

Ernst & Young LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

February 26, 2010

 

 

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS