Attached files

file filename
EX-31 - CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) AND 15D-14(A) - MADISON GAS & ELECTRIC COex31_4u.htm
EX-23 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM - MADISON GAS & ELECTRIC COex23_2u.htm
EX-31 - CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) AND 15D-14(A) - MADISON GAS & ELECTRIC COex31_3u.htm
EX-32 - CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 - MADISON GAS & ELECTRIC COex32_3u.htm
10-K - FORM 10-K PDF - MADISON GAS & ELECTRIC COf10k_2009.pdf
EX-32 - CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 - MADISON GAS & ELECTRIC COex32_4u.htm
EX-12 - RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES - MADISON GAS & ELECTRIC COex12_2u.htm



United States

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K


[X] Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


For the fiscal year ended:

December 31, 2009


[ ] Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


For the transition period from _______________ to _______________




Commission

File No.

Name of Registrant, State of Incorporation, Address

of Principal Executive Offices, and Telephone No.

IRS Employer

Identification No.


000-49965


MGE Energy, Inc.

(a Wisconsin Corporation)

133 South Blair Street

Madison, Wisconsin 53703

(608) 252-7000

www.mgeenergy.com


39-2040501


000-1125


Madison Gas and Electric Company

(a Wisconsin Corporation)

133 South Blair Street

Madison, Wisconsin 53703

(608) 252-7000

www.mge.com


39-0444025




SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:


 


Title of Class

Name of Each Exchange on which Registered

MGE Energy, Inc.

Common Stock, $1 Par Value Per Share

The Nasdaq Stock Market




SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:


 

Title of Class

Madison Gas and Electric Company

Cumulative Preferred Stock, $25 Par Value Per Share




1




Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.


MGE Energy, Inc.

Yes [X] No [   ]

Madison Gas and Electric Company

Yes [   ] No [X]


Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.


MGE Energy, Inc.

Yes [  ] No [X]

Madison Gas and Electric Company

Yes [  ] No [X]


Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports) and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]


Indicate by check mark whether the registrants have submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files): Yes [ ] No [ ]


Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants' knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:


 

Large Accelerated Filer

Accelerated Filer

Non-accelerated Filer

Smaller Reporting Company

MGE Energy, Inc.

X

 

 

 

Madison Gas and Electric Company

 

 

X

 


Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).


MGE Energy, Inc.

Yes [  ] No [X]

Madison Gas and Electric Company

Yes [  ] No [X]


The aggregate market value of the voting and nonvoting common equity held by nonaffiliates of each registrant as of June 30, 2009, was as follows:


MGE Energy, Inc.

$772,862,396

Madison Gas and Electric Company

$0


The number of shares outstanding of each registrant's common stock as of February 1, 2010, were as follows:


MGE Energy, Inc.

23,113,638

Madison Gas and Electric Company

17,347,894



DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE


Portions of MGE Energy, Inc.'s definitive proxy statement to be filed on or before March 24, 2010, relating to its annual meeting of shareholders, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this annual report on Form 10-K.


Madison Gas and Electric Company meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction (I)(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore omitting (i.) the information otherwise required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K relating to a list of subsidiaries of the registrant as permitted by General Instruction (I)(2)(b), (ii.) the information otherwise required by Item 6 relating to Selected Financial Data as permitted by General Instruction (I)(2)(a), (iii.) the information otherwise required by Item 10 relating to Directors and Executive Officers as permitted by General Instruction (I)(2)(c), (iv.) the information otherwise required by Item 11 relating to executive compensation as permitted by General Instruction (I)(2)(c), (v.) the information otherwise required by Item 12 relating to Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management as permitted by General Instruction (I)(2)(c), and (vi.) the information otherwise required by Item 13 relating to Certain Relationships and Related Transactions as permitted by General Instruction (I)(2)(c).



2




Table of Contents



Filing Format

4

Forward-Looking Statements

4

Where to Find More Information

4

Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms Used in the Text and Notes of this Report

5

PART I.

7

Item 1. Business.

7

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

18

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

22

Item 2. Properties.

22

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

23

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

23

PART II.

24

Item 5. Market for Registrants' Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

27

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

28

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

54

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

57

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

117

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

117

Item 9B. Other Information.

117

PART III.

118

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance.

118

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

118

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

118

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

118

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

119

PART IV.

120

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

120

Signatures - MGE Energy, Inc.

129

Signatures - Madison Gas and Electric Company

130




3




Filing Format


This combined Form 10-K is being filed separately by MGE Energy, Inc. (MGE Energy) and Madison Gas and Electric Company (MGE). MGE is a wholly owned subsidiary of MGE Energy and represents a majority of its assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and operations. Thus, all information contained in this report relates to, and is filed by, MGE Energy. Information that is specifically identified in this report as relating solely to MGE Energy, such as its financial statements and information relating to its nonregulated business, does not relate to, and is not filed by, MGE. MGE makes no representation as to that information. The terms "we" and "our," as used in this report, refer to MGE Energy and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated.


Forward-Looking Statements


This report, and other documents filed by MGE Energy and MGE with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) from time to time, contain forward-looking statements that reflect management's current assumptions and estimates regarding future performance and economic conditions—especially as they relate to future load growth, revenues, expenses, capital expenditures, financial resources, regulatory matters, and the scope and expense associated with future environmental regulation. These forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "could," "should," "intend," and other similar words generally identified forward-looking statements. Both MGE Energy and MGE caution investors that these forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected, expressed, or implied.


The factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements made by a registrant (a) include those factors discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, and (b) other factors discussed in filings made by that registrant with the SEC.


Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this report. MGE Energy and MGE undertake no obligation to publicly release any revision to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report.


Where to Find More Information


The public may read and copy any reports or other information that MGE Energy and MGE file with the SEC at the SEC's public reference room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. These documents are also available to the public from commercial document retrieval services, the website maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov, MGE Energy's website at http://www.mgeenergy.com, and MGE's website at http://www.mge.com. Copies may be obtained from our websites free of charge. Information contained on MGE Energy's and MGE's websites shall not be deemed incorporated into, or to be a part of, this report.




4




Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms Used in the Text and Notes of this Report


Abbreviations, acronyms, and definitions used in the text and notes of this report are defined below.


ACESA

American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009

AFUDC

Allowance for Funds Used During Construction

Alliant

Alliant Energy Corporation

ANR

ANR Pipeline Company

ARO

Asset Retirement Obligation

ASM

Ancillary Services Market

ATC

American Transmission Company LLC

BACT

Best Available Control Technology

BART

Best Available Retrofit Technology

Bechtel

Bechtel Power Corporation

Blount

Blount Station

CAA

CAIR

Clean Air Act

Clean Air Interstate Rule

CAMR

Clean Air Mercury Rule

CAVR

Clean Air Visibility Rule

CO2

Carbon Dioxide

Codification

Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification

Columbia

Columbia Energy Center

cooling degree days

Measure of the extent to which the average daily temperature is above 65 degrees Fahrenheit, which is considered an indicator of possible increased demand for energy to provide cooling

CWDC

Central Wisconsin Development Corporation

DOE

Dth

U.S. Department of Energy

Dekatherms

EEI

Edison Electric Institute

Elm Road Units

Elm Road Generating Station

EPA

United States Environmental Protection Agency

ERISA

Employee Retirement Income Security Act

ERS

Elm Road Services, LLC

FASB

Financial Accounting Standards Board

FERC

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

FIP

Federal Implementation Plan

FTR

Financial Transmission Rights

GAAP

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

GCIM

Gas Cost Incentive Mechanism

GHG

Greenhouse Gas

HAPs

heating degree days (HDD)

Hazardous Air Pollutants

Measure of the extent to which the average daily temperature is below 65 degrees Fahrenheit, which is considered an indicator of possible increased demand for energy to provide heating

ICI Boilers

ICR

ICF

interconnection agreement

Industrial, Commercial, or Institutional Boilers

Information Collection Request

Insurance Continuance Fund

Generation-Transmission Interconnection Agreement

IRS

Internal Revenue Service

kV

Kilovolt

kVA

Kilovolt Ampere

kWh

Kilowatt-hour

LIBOR

London Inter Bank Offer Rate

LIFO

Last-in-first-out pricing

M34

MACT

West Marinette Combustion Turbine

Maximum Achievable Control Technology

MAGAEL

MAGAEL, LLC

MGE

Madison Gas and Electric Company

MGE Construct

MGE Construct LLC



5





MGE Energy

MGE Energy, Inc.

MGE Power

MGE Power LLC

MGE Power Elm Road

MGE Power Elm Road, LLC

MGE Power West Campus

MGE Power West Campus, LLC

MGE Transco

MGE Transco Investment LLC

MISO

Midwest Independent System Operator (a regional transmission organization)

Moody's

Moody's Investors Service, Inc.

MRO

Midwest Reliability Organization

MW

Megawatt

MWh

Megawatt-hour

NAAQS

National Ambient Air Quality Standards

Nasdaq

The Nasdaq Stock Market

NERC

National Electric Reliability Council

NNG

Northern Natural Gas Company

NO2

Nitrogen Oxide

NOV

NOx

Notice of Violation

Nitrogen Oxide

NR

Natural Resources

NSR

NSPS

New Source Review

New Source Performance Standards

NYMEX

New York Mercantile Exchange

NYSE

New York Stock Exchange

OPRB

PGA

Other Pension Related Benefits

Purchased Gas Adjustment clause

PJM

PJM Interconnection, LLC (a regional transmission organization)

PM

Particulate Matter

PPA

Purchased power agreement

PSCW

Public Service Commission of Wisconsin

PSD

Prevention of Significant Deterioration

RE

Regional Entities

REC

Renewable Energy Credit

RFC

Reliability First Corporation

RTO

Regional Transmission Organization

SEC

Securities and Exchange Commission

SIP

State Implementation Plan

SO2

Sulfur Dioxide

Standard & Poor's

Standard & Poor's Ratings Group, a division of McGraw-Hill Companies

the State

State of Wisconsin

Stock Plan

Direct Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan of MGE Energy

UW

University of Wisconsin at Madison

VIE

Variable Interest Entity

WCCF

West Campus Cogeneration Facility

WDNR

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

WEPCO

Wisconsin Electric Power Company

Working capital

Current assets less current liabilities

WPDES

Wisconsin Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

WPL

Wisconsin Power and Light Company

WPSC

Wisconsin Public Service Corporation

WRERA

Worker, Retiree and Employer Recovery Act of 2008

6




PART I.


Item 1. Business.


MGE Energy operates in the following business segments:


·

Electric utility operations – generating, purchasing, and distributing electricity through MGE.


·

Gas utility operations – purchasing and distributing natural gas through MGE.


·

Nonregulated energy operations – constructing, owning, and leasing new electric generating capacity that will assist MGE through MGE Energy's wholly owned subsidiaries MGE Power Elm Road and MGE Power West Campus.


·

Transmission Investments – investing in ATC, a company engaged in the business of providing electric transmission services.


·

All Other – investing in companies and property which relate to the regulated operations, financing the regulated operations, or providing construction services to the other subsidiaries through its wholly owned subsidiaries MGE Construct, MAGAEL and CWDC, and Corporate functions.


MGE's utility operations represent a majority of the assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and operations of MGE Energy. MGE Energy's nonregulated energy operations currently include an undivided interest in the assets of the West Campus Cogeneration Facility and an undivided 8.33% ownership interest in the Elm Road Units in Oak Creek, Wisconsin.


As a public utility, MGE is subject to regulation by the PSCW and the FERC. The PSCW has authority to regulate most aspects of MGE's business including rates, accounts, issuance of securities, and plant and transmission line siting. The PSCW also has authority over certain aspects of MGE Energy as a holding company of a public utility. FERC has jurisdiction, under the Federal Power Act, over certain accounting practices and certain other aspects of MGE's business.


MGE Energy's subsidiaries are also subject to regulation under local, state, and federal laws regarding air and water quality and solid waste disposal. See "Environmental" below.


MGE Energy was organized as a Wisconsin corporation in 2001. MGE was organized as a Wisconsin corporation in 1896. Their principal offices are located at 133 South Blair Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53703, and their telephone number is (608) 252-7000.


Electric Utility Operations


MGE distributes electricity in a service area covering a 316 square-mile area of Dane County, Wisconsin. The service area includes the city of Madison, Wisconsin. It owns or leases ownership interests in electric generation facilities located in Wisconsin and Iowa.


At December 31, 2009, MGE supplied electric service to approximately 138,000 customers, with approximately 89% located in the cities of Fitchburg, Madison, Middleton, and Monona and 11% in adjacent areas. Of the total number of customers, approximately 86% were residential and 14% were commercial or industrial. Electric revenues for 2009, 2008, and 2007 were comprised of the following:

 

Twelve Months Ended December 31,

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

Residential

33.0%

 

33.9%

 

33.8%

Commercial

53.0%

 

54.0%

 

51.9%

Industrial

5.1%

 

5.6%

 

5.4%

Public authorities (including the UW)

9.3%

 

9.2%

 

8.0%

Other utilities and other*

(0.4)%

 

(2.7)%

 

0.9%

Total

100.0%

 

100.0%

 

100.0%


*See Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Results of Operations, Electric Utility Operations, Electric sales and revenues, Other revenues section for additional information.



7




Electric operations accounted for approximately 63.3%, 58.8%, and 62.8% of MGE's total 2009, 2008, and 2007 regulated revenues, respectively.


See Item 2. Properties, for a description of MGE's electric utility plant.


MGE is registered with two Regional Entities (RE), The Midwest Reliability Organization (MRO) and Reliability First Corporation (RFC). The essential purposes of the RE are: (1) the development and implementation of regional and NERC reliability standards, and (2) determining compliance with those standards, including enforcement mechanisms.


Transmission


Reliability 2000 legislation enacted in Wisconsin mandated, among other things, the creation of a statewide transmission company to own the investor-owned utilities' transmission assets. Pursuant to these provisions, effective January 1, 2001, MGE transferred all of its electric utility transmission assets to ATC in exchange for an ownership interest in ATC. At December 31, 2009, MGE Transco held a 3.6% ownership interest in ATC.


ATC is owned by the utilities that contributed facilities or capital in accordance with Wisconsin law. ATC's purpose is to provide reliable, economic transmission service to all customers in a fair and equitable manner. ATC plans, constructs, operates, maintains, and expands transmission facilities that it owns to provide adequate and reliable transmission of power. ATC is regulated by FERC for all rate terms and conditions of service and is a transmission-owning member of the MISO.


Regional Transmission Organizations


MGE is a nontransmission owning member of the MISO. MISO is a nonprofit RTO approved by FERC. The MISO is responsible for monitoring the electric transmission system that delivers power from generating plants to wholesale power transmitters. MISO's role is to ensure equal access to the transmission system and to maintain or improve electric system reliability in the Midwest.


MISO maintains a bid-based energy market. MGE offers substantially all of its generation on the MISO market and purchases much of its load requirement from the MISO market in accordance with the MISO Tariff. In January 2009, MISO implemented and MGE began participating in the ancillary services market (ASM). The ASM is an extension of the existing energy market in which MISO assumes the responsibility of maintaining sufficient generation reserves. Previously, MGE was responsible for providing its own reserves. In the ASM, MISO will provide the reserves for MGE's load, and MGE may offer to sell reserves from its generating units. In addition to this market change, MISO took on various Balance Authority functions. In June 2009, MISO implemented and MGE began participating in the voluntary capacity auction. The voluntary capacity auction provides an optional monthly forum for buyers and sellers of aggregate planning resource credits to interact. Load serving entities may participate in the voluntary capacity auction to potentially obtain the necessary aggregate planning resource credits to meet their planning reserve margin requirement. Generator owners may participate to sell any excess aggregate planning resource credits that are not needed.


Additionally, MGE is a member of PJM. PJM is also an RTO. PJM is a neutral and independent party that coordinates and directs the operation of the region's transmission grid, administers a competitive wholesale electricity market, and plans regional transmission expansion improvements to maintain grid reliability and relieve congestion. MGE has one purchase power agreement, for a total of 50 MW, that is affected by this market.


Fuel supply and generation


MGE satisfies its customers' electric demand with internal generation and purchased power. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, MGE's electric energy delivery requirements were satisfied by the following sources:


 

Twelve Months Ended December 31,

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

Coal

41.5%

 

51.9%

 

51.3%

Natural gas

2.9%

 

6.1%

 

8.2%

Fuel oil

0.0%

 

0.1%

 

0.1%

Renewable sources

3.1%

 

2.7%

 

0.8%

Purchased power

52.5%

 

39.2%

 

39.6%

Total

100.0%

 

100.0%

 

100.0%




8




Sources used depend on market prices, generating unit availability, weather, and customer demand.


Coal

MGE and two other utilities jointly own Columbia, a coal-fired generating facility, which accounts for 29% (225 MW) of MGE's net summer rated capacity. Power from this facility is shared in proportion to each owner's ownership interest. MGE has a 22% ownership interest in Columbia. The other owners are WPL (a subsidiary of Alliant), which operates Columbia, and WPSC. The Columbia units burn low-sulfur coal obtained (pursuant to long-term contracts) from the Powder River Basin coal fields located in Wyoming and Montana.


MGE's share of the coal inventory supply for the units increased from approximately 13 days on December 31, 2008, to approximately 47 days on December 31, 2009. The co-owners' current goal is to maintain approximately a 35 day inventory.


MGE also owns the Blount Generating Facility located in Madison, Wisconsin, which is fueled by coal, gas, and other alternative renewable sources. On January 19, 2006, MGE announced a plan, subject to certain conditions, that includes discontinuing coal use at the end of 2011 at Blount. In March 2009, MGE received notification from MISO that in order to meet national electric system reliability standards, MGE will need to keep Blount available at full capacity until MISO declares that the 90 MW are no longer needed for system reliability. To comply with the MISO directive, MGE will delay plans for retiring 90 MW of generation equipment at Blount. The transition from burning coal to burning only natural gas will still occur by the end of 2011. After 2011, the entire plant will be operated exclusively on natural gas.


See discussion below under Nonregulated Operations for MGE's interest in coal-fired generation in Oak Creek, Wisconsin.


Natural gas and oil

MGE owns gas fired combustion turbines. These turbines are primarily located in Madison and Marinette, Wisconsin and have a total of 174 MW of net summer rated capacity.


See discussion above regarding gas-fired generation at Blount Generating Facility and see discussion below under Nonregulated Operations for MGE's interest in a natural gas-fired cogeneration facility on the UW campus.


Renewable generation sources

MGE owns 30 MW or 18 turbines in a wind-powered electric generating facility in Worth County, Iowa. The turbines were placed into service in February 2008. MGE also owns 11 MW or 17 turbines in a wind-powered electric generating facility in Kewaunee County, Wisconsin. The turbines were placed into service in 1999.


Purchased power

MGE enters into short and long-term purchase power commitments to meet a portion of its anticipated electric energy supply needs. The following table identifies purchase power commitments at December 31, 2009 with unaffiliated parties for the next five years.


Year

MWs Under Purchase Power Commitments

2010

227.1

2011

227.1

2012

227.1

2013

252.1

2014

152.1


Wind Development Rights

In June 2009, MGE Energy, through its subsidiary MAGAEL, LLC, entered into agreements to purchase land development rights, including land option agreements, electrical interconnection rights, wind data, engineering plans, licenses, permits, and governmental approvals for two wind development sites. These wind development rights may potentially be used to develop wind farms in three counties in Iowa up to approximately 175 MWs; however, neither MAGAEL nor MGE Energy has any obligation to build any wind generators at these sites.


Gas Utility Operations


MGE transports and distributes natural gas in a service area covering 1,631 square miles in seven south-central Wisconsin counties. The service area includes the city of Madison, Wisconsin.



9




On December 31, 2009, MGE supplied natural gas service to approximately 142,000 customers in the cities of Elroy, Fitchburg, Lodi, Madison, Middleton, Monona, Prairie du Chien, Verona, and Viroqua; 24 villages; and all or parts of 45 townships. Of the total number of customers, approximately 89% were residential and 11% were commercial or industrial. Gas revenues for 2009, 2008, and 2007 were comprised of the following:


 

Twelve Months Ended December 31,

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

Residential

54.9%

 

53.6%

 

55.6%

Commercial

34.5%

 

36.4%

 

38.3%

Industrial

7.8%

 

7.5%

 

4.0%

Transportation service and other

2.8%

 

2.5%

 

2.1%

Total

100.0%

 

100.0%

 

100.0%


Gas operations accounted for approximately 36.7%, 41.2%, and 37.2% of MGE's total 2009, 2008, and 2007 regulated revenues, respectively.


MGE can curtail gas deliveries to its interruptible customers. Approximately 15% of retail gas deliveries in 2009 and 12% in 2008 were to interruptible customers.


Gas supply


MGE has physical interconnections with ANR and NNG. MGE's primary service territory, which includes Madison and the surrounding area, receives deliveries at one NNG and four ANR gate stations. MGE also receives deliveries at NNG gate stations located in Elroy, Prairie du Chien, Viroqua, and Crawford County. Interconnections with two major pipelines provide competition in interstate pipeline service and a more reliable and economical gas supply mix, which includes gas from Canada and from the mid-continent and Gulf/offshore regions in the United States.


During the winter months, when customer demand is high, MGE is primarily concerned with meeting its obligation to firm customers. MGE meets customer demand by using firm supplies under contracts finalized before the heating season, supplies in storage (injected during the summer), and other firm supplies purchased during the winter period.


By contract, a total of 5,417,288 Dth can be injected into ANR's storage fields in Michigan from April 1 through October 31. These gas supplies are then available for withdrawal during the subsequent heating season, November 1 through March 31. Using storage allows MGE to buy gas supplies during the summer season, when prices are normally lower, and withdraw these supplies during the winter season, when prices are typically higher. Storage also gives MGE more flexibility in meeting daily load fluctuations.


MGE's contracts for firm transportation service include winter maximum daily quantities of:


166,150 Dth (including 96,078 Dth of storage withdrawals) on ANR.

60,108 Dth on NNG.


Nonregulated Energy Operations


MGE Energy, through its subsidiaries, seeks to develop generation sources that will assist MGE in meeting the electricity needs of its customers. Decisions on the type of energy source and its size, timing, ownership, and financing depend upon a number of factors including the growth of customer demand in MGE's service area and surrounding areas, the effectiveness of customer demand management efforts, the costs and availability of alternative power sources, mandates regarding renewable energy resources, the availability of transmission capacity, issues associated with siting power generation sources, available financing and ownership structures, regulatory treatment and recovery, construction lead times and risks, and other factors. The decisions tend to involve long-time horizons due to the lead time involved in siting and constructing new generation sources and the associated transmission infrastructure.




10




WCCF


MGE Power West Campus and the UW jointly own undivided interests in a natural gas-fired cogeneration facility on the UW campus. The facility has the capacity to produce 20,000 tons of chilled water, 500,000 pounds per hour of steam, and approximately 150 MW of electricity. The UW owns 45% of the facility, which represents its interest in the chilled-water and steam assets. These assets are used to meet the UW's growing need for air-conditioning and steam-heat capacity. MGE Power West Campus owns 55% of the facility, which represents its interest in the electric generating assets. These assets are used to provide electricity to MGE's customers. The UW's share of the plant and portion of the earnings from the WCCF are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements of MGE Energy or MGE. MGE Power West Campus' share of the cost of this project is reflected in property, plant, and equipment on MGE Energy's and MGE's consolidated balance sheets.


MGE leases the electric generating assets owned by MGE Power West Campus and is responsible for operating the entire facility. The financial terms of the facility lease include a capital structure of 53% equity and 47% long-term debt, return on equity of 12.1%, and a lease term of 30 years. At the end of the lease term in 2035, MGE may, at its option, renew the facility lease for an additional term, purchase the generating facility at fair market value or allow the lease contract to end.


Elm Road


MGE Power Elm Road and two other owners own undivided interests in the coal-fired Elm Road Units in Oak Creek, Wisconsin. Unit 1 entered commercial operation on February 2, 2010, and has the capacity to produce 615 MW of electricity. Unit 2 is under construction, is expected to have a capacity to produce 615 MW of electricity, and is expected to enter commercial operation in August 2010. Wisconsin Energy Corporation owns approximately 83% of the Elm Road Units and is the operator for those units. MGE Power Elm Road owns an 8.33% ownership interest in both units. Both units will be used to provide electricity to MGE's customers.


MGE leases MGE Power Elm Road's ownership interest in the Elm Road Units pursuant to two separate facility leases. The financial terms of each facility lease include a capital structure of 55% equity and 45% long-term debt, return on equity of 12.7%, and a lease term of 30 years. At the end of the respective lease terms, MGE may, at its option, renew the facility lease for an additional term, purchase the leased ownership interest at fair market value or allow the lease to end. The Unit 1 lease commenced with the commercial operation of that unit, and the Unit 2 lease will commence with the commercial operation of that unit.


MGE Power Elm Road's estimated share of capital costs for its ownership interest in the Elm Road Units is approximately $180 million (excluding capitalized interest). These costs have been financed primarily through funds received from MGE Energy, which came from the sale of common stock (via the Stock Plan), short-term debt, and operating cash flows. On February 4, 2010, MGE Power Elm Road issued $50 million of 5.04% senior secured notes due 2040 to reimburse MGE Energy for a portion of its funds. At December 31, 2009, MGE Power Elm Road had incurred $168.3 million (excluding capitalized interest) of costs on the project.


On November 1, 2005, MGE received approval from the PSCW to defer payments made to MGE Power Elm Road for carrying costs during construction of the facility, management fees, and community impact mitigation costs. MGE began collecting the carrying costs in rates in 2006. MGE estimates total carrying costs to be approximately $59.5 million. Of these costs, $17.6 million is estimated to relate to the capitalized interest on the debt portion of the facility. These costs will be recognized over the period in which the facility will be depreciated. The remaining $41.9 million is estimated to represent the equity portion and is being recognized over the period recovered in rates.


See Footnote 21 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for more information regarding the Elm Road Units and the settlement of a dispute with the general contractor, Bechtel Power Corporation, regarding construction of the units.

Environmental




11




MGE is subject to local, state, and federal regulations concerning air quality, water quality, and solid waste disposal. The EPA administers certain federal statutes relating to such matters. The WDNR administers certain state statutes as to such matters and has primary state jurisdiction over air and water quality and solid and hazardous waste matters. These regulations affect the manner in which MGE conducts its operations, the costs of those operations, as well as some capital and operating expenditures. They can also affect the siting, timing, and cost of new projects or other significant actions affecting the environment. MGE is not able to predict the direction of future regulations or if compliance with any such regulations will involve additional expenditures for pollution control equipment, plant modifications, or curtailment of operations. Such actions could reduce capacity or efficiency at existing plants or delay the construction and operation of future generating facilities.


Based upon current available information, compliance with various environmental requirements and initiatives is expected to result in significant additional operating and capital expenditures at Columbia and may affect those expenditures at other MGE generating facilities. In April 2009, the Columbia owners requested authorization from the PSCW for an emissions reduction project as a result of an environmental initiative. The operator's current estimates show that MGE's share of the capital expenditures required to comply with this project will be approximately $140 million. According to the current estimate, this project is expected to result in an increase to Columbia's ongoing operating expenses. MGE expects that the costs pertaining to this project will be fully recoverable through rates.


Air quality


Air quality regulations promulgated by the EPA and WDNR in accordance with the Federal Clean Air Act and the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 impose restrictions on emission of particulates, sulfur dioxide (SO2) nitrogen oxides (NOx) and other pollutants and require permits for operation of emission sources. These permits have been obtained by MGE and must be renewed periodically. Various initiatives, including the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards, new source performance standards (NSPS) and the Clean Air Visibility Rule (also known as the Regional Haze Rule), as well as state mercury emissions limits, are expected to result in additional operating and capital expenditure costs for electric generating units.


CAIR

The CAIR requires NOx and SO2 emission reductions in two phases and includes a regional cap-and-trade system. The first phase began in 2009 for NOx and the second phase begins in 2010 for SO2, and contemplates reductions from 2003 levels of 55% and 40%, respectively, increasing in the second phase (by 2015) to 65% and 70%, respectively from 2003 levels. MGE owns several generation units currently subject to CAIR: Blount Generating Station, Columbia, M34 (West Marinette Combustion Turbine) and Fitchburg Combustion Turbines. In future years, Elm Road will be, and WCCF may be, affected by the CAIR. MGE anticipates that it may need to purchase NOx and SO2 allowances and /or install equipment at Columbia to meet CAIR allocations for its generation fleet. The exact cost of the allowances and/or equipment installation is not known at this time.


The long-term design and implementation of the CAIR, however, is uncertain at this time. On December 23, 2008, the D.C. Circuit Court remanded the CAIR to the EPA. The court's remand to the EPA did not include a deadline. The CAIR remains in effect until modified by the EPA. Based on this remand it is likely that the current cap-and-trade system will be modified.


Wisconsin State Mercury Rule

Wisconsin has revised its state mercury rule (NR 446, effective December 1, 2008). The revised NR 446 requires large coal-fired electric generating units (larger than 150 MW) to reduce mercury emissions by 90% beginning in 2015, or choose a multi-pollutant reduction approach, which allows a stepped approach to mercury reduction while reducing NOX and SO2 emissions at prescribed rates. Smaller coal-fired electric generating units (between 25 – 150 MW in size) will need to apply Best Available Control Technology (BACT) to achieve mercury reductions.


Effective January 1, 2010, Wisconsin NR 446 also requires a 40% fleet-wide mercury reduction (as compared to an average of 2002, 2003, and 2004 baseline mercury emissions) for major Wisconsin utilities. Because the majority owner and operator of Columbia and the majority owner and operator at Elm Road are defined as major utilities under this rule, Columbia's and Elm Road's mercury emissions in 2010-2014 will be subject to this 40% fleet-wide reduction. Elm Road's majority owner has installed highly efficient mercury-reduction equipment on its units. Columbia's majority owner plans to meet this fleet-wide reduction in a number of ways, including utilizing mercury reduction equipment previously installed on one of Columbia's units. We do not anticipate any changes in dispatch at Columbia or Elm Road as a result of this fleet-wide reduction requirement. However any dispatch changes, if they were to become necessary to meet this requirement, could negatively affect our operating costs.




12




MACT Standards for Electric Utilities

On February 9, 2009, the Justice Department, on behalf of the EPA, asked the Supreme Court to dismiss EPA's petition for review of the D.C. Circuit Court's vacatur of the Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR). This withdrawal paves the way for the EPA to develop MACT standards for electric utilities (for mercury as well as other Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs)).


As part of the EPA's process for developing MACT standards for electric utilities, the EPA has sent out an Information Collection Request (ICR) to hundreds of utilities across the United States that have coal and oil-burning electric generating units. The EPA has indicated that they will use the information collected from this ICR to assist in the development of electric generating unit MACT standards. Under this ICR, Blount and Columbia received letters requesting information on pollution control equipment. Elm Road is required to perform testing in addition to responding to the information requests.


It is unclear at this time when electric generating unit MACT standards will be created for electric utilities and how they will affect MGE's operations. The implementation of the MACT standards may affect our facilities that burn coal and oil. However, we are uncertain of the exact cost or operational impact until the final MACT standards are known.


Boiler MACT

The EPA developed a MACT standard for industrial, commercial and institutional boilers (Boiler MACT) that was later vacated. The EPA has been under court-order to develop a new MACT standard to replace the one that had been vacated. The EPA has interpreted that this vacatur requires that case-by-case MACT under Section 112(j) of the Clean Air Act (the "MACT Hammer") be applied in the interim to all boilers that fit the definition of a industrial, commercial or institutional boiler (ICI boilers) regardless of whether or not they were exempt under the vacated rule. The WDNR, following the EPA's interpretation, has required that all facilities with ICI boilers submit initial MACT Hammer applications.


MGE has boilers at Blount and Columbia that are classified as ICI boilers and has sent in all necessary paperwork to the WDNR. Some boilers at Blount and Columbia have the potential of being subject to emission standards for HAPs for ICI boilers under either the MACT Hammer provisions, or the revised Boiler MACT. If subject to these rules, it will be necessary to submit permit applications to the WDNR. If any of our boilers are subject to Boiler MACT Hammer, it may require that we test or limit emissions and/or install additional pollution controls. Because of the uncertainty with this rule at this time, we cannot predict when or if we will need additional resources or capital to comply with either version of Boiler MACT.


BART/CAVR

Air modeling indicates that SO2 and NOX emission (and to a lesser extent particulate matter, or PM) from Columbia may impair visibility at certain Class I Scenic Areas and may therefore be subject to the Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) regulations, a subsection of the EPA's Clean Air Visibility Rule (CAVR).


Wisconsin has promulgated a BART implementation rule which clarifies that fossil fuel fired electric plants subject to the CAIR trading programs are not required to conduct a BART analysis for SO2 or NOX emissions, and the determination of BART shall be made for PM emissions only. However, a remanded CAIR has left open the potential for revisions to Wisconsin's rule. The WDNR is exploring potential revisions. The revisions have a potential to affect capital and operating expenses, but exact costs cannot be determined at this time.


Wisconsin was required to submit a CAVR State Implementation Plan (SIP) to the EPA by December 2007. The EPA found Wisconsin to be deficient in this submittal in January 2009. Wisconsin has two years from this finding of deficiency to submit a CAVR SIP. If no CAVR SIP is submitted within that two year period, then the EPA must promulgate a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) for the State of Wisconsin. Without a proposed CAVR implementation rule in place, it is unclear to what extent either a CAVR SIP or FIP will affect MGE generation plants.


National Ambient Air Quality Standards


Nitrogen Oxide Emission Budget

In 1998, the EPA issued a rule that imposed a NOx emission budget for emission sources in Wisconsin. In 2000, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia invalidated a portion of the rule concerning Wisconsin's alleged impacts on downwind, 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas. EPA has also stayed that portion of the rule concerning Wisconsin's alleged impacts on downwind 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas. If that portion of the rule concerning eight-hour ozone nonattainment areas is upheld, the resulting NOx emission budget for Wisconsin could potentially affect the level of permissible NOx emissions from Blount, Columbia, and WCCF.



13




Particulate Matter NAAQS

In 2006, the EPA lowered the acceptable 24-hour National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter, or PM2.5 – i.e., a particulate matter air pollutant that is 2.5 microns or smaller in size. States monitor and collect data on PM2.5 levels and recommend counties/areas within their state for attainment or nonattainment with the NAAQS. The EPA makes the final decision on attainment/nonattainment areas. In mid-December 2008, the EPA designated several areas of the State, including Dane County (where Blount and WCCF are located), a portion of Columbia County (where Columbia is located), and the Milwaukee/Racine area (where Elm Road is located) as nonattainment areas for the 24-hour PM2.5 standard. The EPA made these initial determinations based on monitoring data for the years 2005-2007 data. On October 8, 2009, EPA announced its final PM2.5 attainment designations for Wisconsin using the 2006 through 2008 data and only Milwaukee, Racine and Waukesha Counties were designated as nonattainment. The State of Wisconsin will need to develop a SIP by early 2012 for those counties that remain designated as nonattainment. Implementation of the fine particulate NAAQS could affect capital, operational and maintenance expenses at MGE generating facilities.


In February 2009, the PM2.5 standards were remanded to the EPA by the D.C. Circuit Court. The current primary hourly and annual standards will remain in place as the EPA reviews both the primary and secondary standard as per the D.C. Circuit Court decision. If the standards are made more stringent, more counties where our generation is located could become nonattainment; however, that cannot be known until the standards are finalized.


Ozone NAAQS

On March 12, 2008, the EPA announced a new 8-hour NAAQS for ozone that is more stringent than the current standard (standard lowered from 0.08 to 0.075 parts per million). States (including Wisconsin) must monitor and collect data on ozone levels in order to determine attainment or nonattainment status on a county and/or area basis. Currently available monitoring data for Dane, Columbia and Milwaukee counties (where our generation facilities are located) demonstrates attainment with the March 12, 2008 standard.


On January 6, 2010, EPA published a proposed rule reconsidering the March 12, 2008 8-hour ozone standard. In this proposed rule, EPA states their intent to revise both the primary (set for protection of public health) and secondary (set for protection of public welfare and environment) ozone standards and indicates that they will set an 8-hour ambient ozone standard between 0.060 – 0.070 parts per million (ppm). EPA further indicates that they will set a secondary standard of 7 – 15 ppm-hours measured on a weighted average over a three-month period during the ozone season.


We cannot determine at this time if Dane, Columbia and/or Milwaukee counties, will be in attainment with the potential revised standards (i.e., have ambient air quality that is at or below the attainment level ultimately selected by the EPA), but there is modeling to suggest the potential for nonattainment in any or all of these counties with the range currently under consideration by the EPA. A nonattainment designation for the 8-hour ozone standard in any of these counties has the potential to increase operating and capital expenditures at Columbia (located in Columbia County), Blount and WCCF (located in Dane County) and Elm Road (located in Milwaukee County).


Nitrogen Dioxide NAAQS

On January 22, 2010, the EPA revised its primary Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) NAAQS. The current annual primary NO2 standard remains, while a one-hour 100 parts per billion (ppb) standard has been added that focuses on near-roadway exposures to NO2. The EPA expects states to submit initial recommendations for nonattainment areas by January 2011 using 2008-2010 data. The EPA plans to make final attainment and nonattainment designations by January 2012. The EPA has not changed the secondary NAAQS for NO2, but intends to address potential changes as part of a secondary review. It is unclear at this time how MGE's power plants would be affected by this proposed revision.


Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS

On November 16, 2009, the EPA proposed to change the primary Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS from a 140 parts per billion (ppb) standard measured over a twenty-four hour period to an hourly standard. The EPA is proposing a range of 50 – 100 ppb hourly standard. The EPA has also indicated that a secondary NAAQS standard for SO2 will be proposed in 2010. In addition to the proposed changes to the SO2 NAAQS, the EPA is also proposing that SO2 monitoring sites be redesigned so that they monitor areas where short-term concentrations of SO2 are more likely. The EPA is currently proposing that roughly 345 monitoring locations be created based on high-level SO2 concentration areas and high population/high SO2 level areas. Based on the proposed rule, we anticipate that roadside monitors would be placed in Dane and Milwaukee counties, but the actual placement has not been determined. It is unclear at this time how MGE's power plants would be affected by this proposed revision.




14




Columbia Air Operating Permit

In September 2008, the Wisconsin DNR issued a Title V renewal operating permit to WPL (the operator and permit holder) for Columbia. A citizen group petitioned EPA to object to the issuance of the permit renewal. In October 2009, the EPA issued an order granting in part and denying in part the petition and sent the operating permit back to the Wisconsin DNR for further review based on the EPA order. The EPA order gave WDNR 90 days to address the objections and take action on the September 2008 operating permit. The Wisconsin DNR has been working with the EPA and has been in contact with WPL related to this matter. To date, no changes have been made to the previously issued permit for Columbia. MGE is unable to predict what actions the WDNR or EPA may take on the permit.


In October 2009, the Sierra Club provided notice of its intent to file a civil lawsuit against the owners and operator of Columbia for alleged violations of the Clean Air Act. WPL is the plant operator and permit holder, and owns 46.2% of Columbia. Wisconsin Public Service Corporation (WPSC) owns a 31.8% interest, and MGE owns a 22% interest in Columbia. Among other things, this notice alleges the failure to obtain necessary air permits and implement necessary emission controls associated with activities undertaken in approximately 2000 and 2005. If pursued and successful, this lawsuit could result in civil penalties, injunctive relief, as well as increased capital and operating/maintenance expenditures at Columbia. WPL, the operator and permit holder for Columbia, has informed MGE that it is reviewing the allegations and is currently unable to predict the impact of the allegations on Columbia's finances or operations at this time.


In December 2009, the EPA sent a Notice of Violation (NOV) to the owners and operator of Columbia. The NOV alleges that the owners and operator failed to comply with appropriate pre-construction review and permitting requirements of the New Source Review (NSR) program, and as a result violated the PSD program requirements, Title V Operating Permit requirements of the CAA and the SIP. WPL, the plant operator, as well as MGE and WPSC as owners of Columbia, have begun discussions with the EPA regarding the NOV.


If pursued and successful, these actions could result in civil penalties in amounts of up to $37,500 per day (for all joint owners) for each violation and/or injunctive relief to require installation of pollution control technology at Columbia, which would increase future capital and operating expenditures. WPL, the plant permit holder and operator, has also informed MGE that it is in the process of evaluating the allegations and is unable to predict the impact of the allegations on Columbia's finances or operations at this time, but believes that an adverse outcome could be significant. WPL has also informed MGE and WPSC that the current intent is to defend against these actions because WPL believes the projects in question did not violate the CAA. Nevertheless, the owners are exploring settlement options while simultaneously preparing to defend against the allegations. MGE has not recognized any related loss contingency amounts as of December 31, 2009.


Water quality


MGE is subject to water quality regulations issued by the WDNR. These regulations include discharge standards, which require the use of effluent-treatment processes equivalent to categorical "best practicable" or "best available" technologies under compliance schedules established under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. The WDNR has published categorical regulations for chemical and thermal discharges from electric-steam generating plants. The regulations limit discharges from MGE's plants into Lake Monona and other Wisconsin waters.


Proposed Thermal Discharge Rules in Wisconsin

The WDNR is promulgating revised rules to regulate thermal effluent discharges from point sources in Wisconsin. The current draft rules apply strict standards for thermal discharges into inland lakes, streams, rivers, and the Great Lakes. While dischargers can apply for variances, MGE may incur additional capital expenditures, such as equipment upgrades at Blount and Columbia, if the variances are not granted. Costs at Blount have not been fully determined, however, capital expenditures may include cooling towers, which in past analyses have been shown to be cost prohibitive. Potential costs at Columbia have not been determined at this time. Based on initial reviews of the current revised rules, we do not expect the Elm Road Units to be effected by these rules.

 

EPA Cooling Water Discharge Rules (Section 316(b))

In 2004, the EPA promulgated final rules under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act addressing cooling water intake structures for existing large power plants (Phase II rule). A challenge to this rule was upheld in a January 2007 court decision and significant parts of the rule were remanded to the EPA for further consideration. In July 2007, EPA suspended the Phase II rule in its entirety and directed states to use their "best professional judgment" in evaluating intake systems. The ruling, and EPA's actions in response, which may change the compliance requirements, may at some point affect the timing and costs associated with MGE's WPDES permit for Blount and possibly the WPDES permit for the Elm Road facility. At this time, MGE is unable to determine the timing or amount of that impact.



15




WPDES permit – Elm Road


On July 31, 2008, the WDNR issued the final modified WPDES permit for the Elm Road Facility with no substantive changes from the previously issued draft permit allowing for a once-through cooling system. The deadline for a legal challenge to the permit has expired without appeal.

 

On July 31, 2008, the joint owners of the Oak Creek expansion reached an agreement with Clean Wisconsin, Inc. and Sierra Club, the groups opposing the WPDES permit. Under the settlement agreement, these groups agreed to withdraw their opposition to the modified WPDES permit. The joint owners committed to various environmental projects, including projects designed to address greenhouse gas emissions and water quality. MGE's share of those commitments involved a payment of $0.4 million for greenhouse gas reduction efforts. Additional payments of approximately $0.3 million, subject to regulatory approval, will be made annually over 24 years (2011-2034) to address water quality issues in Lake Michigan. In December 2009, the PSCW authorized recovery of the 2011 payment to address water quality issues.


Solid waste


MGE is listed as a potentially responsible party for a site the EPA has placed on the national priorities Superfund list. The Lenz Oil site in Lemont, Illinois, was used for storing and processing waste oil for several years. This site requires clean up under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act. A group of companies, including MGE, is currently working on cleaning up the site. Management believes that its share of the final cleanup costs for the Lenz Oil site will not result in any materially adverse effects on MGE's operations, cash flows, or financial position. Insurance may cover a portion of the cleanup costs. Management believes that the cleanup costs not covered by insurance will be recovered in current and future rates. As of December 31, 2009, the EPA has agreed on a remedy for the Lenz Oil site. The remedy included a five year $2.2 million implementation plan. The EPA has asked all potentially responsible parties to pay upfront for this five year implementation plan. MGE's portion is less than $0.1 million.


MGE has been reviewing legislative and regulatory initiatives associated with ash storage and disposal, including potential regulations or legislation that may require new or additional monitoring of storage sites, may re-classify ash waste, and may regulate ash storage site structural design. Given the uncertainty surrounding these initiatives, it is not possible to estimate the potential costs associated with the implementation of any of these initiatives at this time.


Global climate change


MGE is a producer of GHG emissions, primarily from the fossil fuel generating facilities it utilizes to meet customers' energy needs, as well as from its natural gas pipeline system and fleet vehicles. Climate change and the regulatory response to it could significantly affect our operations in a number of ways, including increased operating costs and capital expenditures, restrictions on energy supply options, permitting difficulties and emission limits. However, the financial consequences of this compliance cannot be determined until final legislation and/or regulations are passed. MGE management would expect to seek and receive rate recovery of such compliance costs, yet the probability and specific impact of such regulation cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. MGE will continue to monitor proposed climate change legislation and regulation.


MGE is already addressing GHG emissions through voluntary actions. In 2005, MGE announced its Energy 2015 Plan which commits to ensuring a balanced, economic energy supply with reduced environmental emissions. The Plan emphasizes increased renewable energy, energy efficiency and new cleaner generation – three strategies that reduce GHG emissions. Under MGE's Energy 2015 Plan and other actions, our CO2 emissions are currently projected to decline from 2005 to 2015 even though total system energy is estimated to increase. We are already well under way with implementing our Energy 2015 Plan strategies and are committed to achieving its goals. However, a number of factors, including but not limited to, changes in economic conditions, regulatory actions, customer response, energy supply issues and transmission delays, may require us to update and perhaps refine certain aspects of our Energy 2015 Plan accordingly. The cost of implementing our Energy 2015 Plan is not expected to result in any materially adverse effects on MGE's operations, cash flows, or financial position. Management believes that costs to implement the Energy 2015 Plan will be recoverable through rates.




16




EPA's Determination of Endangerment from Greenhouse Gases

On April 17, 2009, the EPA published a proposed finding that six greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the atmosphere endanger the public health and welfare of current and future generations. EPA further proposed finding that emission of these substances from new motor vehicles are contributing to this endangerment. On December15, 2009, the EPA finalized the endangerment finding for these six greenhouse gases and determined, through this finding, that these six GHGS, when emitted from new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines, contribute to the greenhouse gas air pollution and endangers public health and welfare under CAA Section 202(a). Although EPA states that finalizing these findings will not in and of itself impose requirements on electric generating utilities, this endangerment finding could be the first step toward regulating GHGs from electric generating facilities under the Clean Air Act. At this time we cannot predict the likelihood nor the effect of such regulation on our generating facilities. MGE is already addressing its GHGs through voluntary actions, and MGE will continue to monitor proposed GHG legislation and regulatory developments.


EPA Rule on Greenhouse Gas Reporting

On September 22, 2009, the EPA issued its final mandatory GHG reporting rule. Under the final rule MGE will need to report on GHG emissions from its natural gas distribution system, its electric generating units subject to the EPA's Acid Rain Program and certain of its stationary combustion and electric units during 2010. MGE is collecting the data needed to file the required report on 2010 emissions by March 31, 2011.


EPA's Proposed Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule

On September 30, 2009, the EPA proposed to set a significance level for GHGs under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V programs of the Clean Air Act. These programs apply to electric generating units. In the rule proposal, the EPA explains that setting these significance levels is necessary because the EPA anticipates promulgating regulations that will trigger PSD and Title V applicability requirements for GHGs for electric generating sources (among other sources). Based on the significance levels now proposed by EPA, MGE has several electric generating units and other stationary combustion units that would be covered. The potential affects or cost of these proposed regulations on MGE are uncertain at this time.


Proposed Climate Change Legislation

On June 26, 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (ACESA). The proposed legislation has several titles that would collectively impact virtually all aspects of the economy, including electric and natural gas utilities.


The proposed legislation includes: (1) a "clean energy" title that, among other things, creates a nationwide combined efficiency and renewable electricity standard that requires 6% efficiency/renewables by 2012 increasing to 20% by 2020 and calls for increased research and development; (2) an "energy efficiency" title that increases energy efficiency across all sectors of the economy, including buildings, appliances, transportation, and industry; (3) a "global warming" title that calls for a cap-and-trade program that would reduce U.S. emissions of GHGs economy-wide by 3% below 2005 levels in 2012, 20% below 2005 levels by 2020 and 83% below 2005 levels by 2050 and provides a methodology for distributing allowances to covered entities; and (4) a "transitioning" title that seeks to promote green jobs during the transition to a clean energy economy.


The U.S. Senate is also considering similar legislation. Any legislation passed by the Senate would need to be reconciled with the House legislation and signed by the President before it would become law.


The State of Wisconsin continues to consider GHG reductions through the implementation of recommendations made by Governor Doyle's Global Warming Task Force (July 2008 report). MGE participated as an active member of the Task Force. The report contained over 50 recommendations. Some specific recommendations of particular relevance to the utility industry include: (i) a significant increase in required energy efficiency efforts and funding; (ii) a State renewable portfolio standard that would require 10% renewables by 2013 and 25% by 2025; (iii) creation of a broad-based multi-sector carbon cap and trade program by 2012 at either the federal or regional level; (iv) investigation and possible adoption of new rate making approaches and innovative rate designs to promote state and utility energy efficiency programs and provide more information to customers; and (v) modification of Wisconsin's current restrictions on nuclear plant construction. Several PSCW proceedings have been commenced as a result of Task Force recommendations. Many of the recommendations made by the Global Warming Task Force have been included in legislation introduced in the Wisconsin Assembly and Senate on January 6, 2010 ("The Clean Energy Jobs Act", Senate Bill 450, Assembly Bill 649).


In addition, Wisconsin signed on to the Midwestern GHG Accord – an accord designed to develop a Midwestern GHG reduction program. While the reduction program has not been fully developed at this time, any actions taken by states within the Accord would require legislative action within that state.



17




Employees


As of December 31, 2009, MGE had 717 employees. MGE employs 238 employees who are covered by a collective bargaining agreement with Local Union 2304 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and 96 employees who are covered by a collective bargaining agreement with Local Union No. 39 of the Office and Professional Employees International Union. Both of these collective bargaining agreements expire on April 30, 2012. There are also 5 employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement with Local Union No. 2-111 of the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial, and Service Workers International Union. This collective bargaining agreement expires on October 31, 2012.


Financial Information About Segments


See Footnote 23 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for financial information relating to MGE Energy's and MGE's business segments.


Executive Officers of the Registrants

Executive

Title

Effective

Date

Service

Years as

an Officer

Gary J. Wolter(a)

Age: 55

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

02/01/2002

20

Lynn K. Hobbie(b)

Age: 51

Senior Vice President

02/01/2000

15

James G. Bidlingmaier(b)

Age: 63

Vice President - Admin. and Chief Information Officer

02/01/2000

9

Kristine A. Euclide(b)

Age: 57

Vice President and General Counsel

11/15/2001

8

Scott A. Neitzel(b)

Age: 49

Vice President – Energy Supply

Vice President – Energy Supply Policy

09/01/2006

07/01/2002

12

Jeffrey C. Newman(a)

Age: 47

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

Vice President and Treasurer

01/01/2009

01/01/2001

12

Peter J. Waldron(b)

Age: 52

Vice President and Operations Officer

Vice President – Energy Supply Operations

09/01/2006

07/01/2002

13


Note: Ages, years of service, and positions as of December 31, 2009.

(a) Executive officer of MGE Energy and MGE.

(b) Executive officer of MGE.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors.


MGE Energy and its subsidiaries, including MGE, operate in a market environment that involves significant risks, many of which are beyond their control. The following risk factors may adversely affect their results of operations, cash flows and market price for their publicly traded securities. While MGE Energy and MGE believe they have identified and discussed below the key risk factors affecting their business, there may be additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known or that are not currently believed to be significant that may adversely affect their performance or financial condition in the future.


Regulatory Risk


We are subject to extensive government regulation in our business, which affects our costs and responsiveness to changing events and circumstances.


Our business is subject to regulation at the State and Federal levels. We are subject to regulation as a holding company by the PSCW. MGE is regulated by the PSCW as to its rates, terms and conditions of service; various business practices and transactions; financing; and transactions between it and its affiliates, including MGE Energy. MGE is also subject to regulation by the FERC, which regulates certain aspects of its business. The regulations adopted by the State and Federal agencies affect the manner in which we do business, our ability to undertake specified actions since pre-approval or authorization may be required, the costs of operations, and the level of rates charged to recover such costs. Our ability to attract capital is also dependent in part, upon our ability to obtain a fair return from the PSCW.




18




We face risk for the recovery of fuel and purchased power costs when they exceed the base rate established in MGE's current rate structure.


MGE burns natural gas in several of its peak electric generation facilities, and in many cases, the cost of purchased power is tied to the cost of natural gas. MGE bears significant regulatory risk for the recovery from customers of such fuel and purchased power costs when they are higher than the base rate established in its current rate structure.


We are subject to environmental laws and regulations that affect our costs and business plans.


Our subsidiaries are subject to environmental laws and regulations that affect the manner in which they conduct business, including capital expenditures, operating costs and potential liabilities. Changes and developments in these laws and regulations may change or limit our business plans, make them more costly to implement, or expose us to liabilities for past or current operations.


Numerous environmental regulations govern many aspects of our present and future operations, including air emissions, water quality, wastewater discharges, solid waste, and hazardous waste; and continue to evolve in response to real or perceived concerns, regulatory initiatives, nongovernmental organizational initiatives and private parties and legal process. The development of these regulations can introduce uncertainty into the planning and implementation process for long-lead time projects, such as generating stations, and can introduce costly delays if previous decisions need to be revisited as a result of judicial mandate or regulatory change. These regulations generally require us to obtain and comply with a wide variety of environmental licenses, permits, inspections, and other approvals, and can result in increased capital, operating, and other costs, particularly with regard to enforcement efforts focused on power plant emissions obligations. These effects can be seen not only with respect to new construction, such as our participation in the Elm Road generating units, but could also require the installation of additional control equipment or the implementation of other compliance measures such as altered operating conditions.


In addition, we may be a responsible party for environmental clean-up at sites identified as containing hazardous materials. It is difficult to predict the costs potentially associated with a site clean-up due to the potential joint and several liability for all potentially responsible parties, the nature of the clean-up required and the availability of recovery from other potentially responsible parties.


We may incur material costs of compliance if federal and/or state legislation is adopted to address climate change.


Various persons, including legislators, regulators, litigants, and private parties, have increasingly expressed concern about the effects of global warming and the effects of greenhouse gases (GHG). These concerns have prompted active discussion on federal and state legislation, as well as regional initiatives, that would regulate or cap such emissions. There have been several proposed versions of legislation pending in the U.S. Congress and in the Wisconsin legislature to address global climate changes, including efforts to reduce and control and/or tax the emission of GHG, such as carbon dioxide, created in the combustion of fossil fuels, including coal, natural gas, and oil. Bills are also considering releases associated with natural gas pipelines and company fleets. These initiatives are sometime paired with efforts to mandate increasing percentages of electricity from renewable forms of energy, such as wind, or to reduce the demand for electricity. Such legislative and regulatory initiatives could have the potential for a significant financial impact on MGE, including the cost to install new emission control equipment, purchase allowances, or do fuel switching. However, the financial consequences of this compliance cannot be determined until final legislation is passed.


Operating Risk


We are affected by weather, which affects customer demand and can affect the operation of our facilities.


The demand for electricity and gas is affected by weather. Very warm and very cold temperatures, especially for prolonged periods, can dramatically increase the demand for electricity for cooling and heating, respectively, as opposed to the softening effect of more moderate temperatures. Our electric revenues are sensitive to the summer cooling season and, to a lesser extent, the winter heating season. Similarly, very cold temperatures can dramatically increase the demand for gas for heating. A significant portion of our gas system demand is driven by heating. Extreme summer conditions or storms may stress electric transmission and distribution systems, resulting in increased maintenance costs and limiting the ability to meet peak customer demand.




19




We are affected by economic activity within our service area.


Higher levels of development and business activity generally increase the numbers of customers and their use of electricity and gas. Likewise, periods of recessionary economic conditions generally adversely affect our results of operations.


Our ability to manage our purchased power costs is influenced by a number of uncontrollable factors.


We are exposed to additional purchased power costs to the extent that our power needs cannot be fully covered by the supplies available from our existing facilities and contractual arrangements. Those needs, and our costs, could be affected by:


·

Increased demand due to, for example, weather, customer growth, or customer obligations,


·

The inability to transmit our contracted power from its generation source to our customers due to transmission line constraints, outages, or equipment failures,


·

Reductions in the availability of power from our owned or contracted generation sources due to equipment failures, shortages of fuel or environmental limitations on operations, and


·

Failure to perform on the part of any party from which we purchase capacity or energy.


An unexpected change in demand or the availability of generation or transmission facilities can expose us to increased costs of sourcing electricity in the short-term market where pricing may be more volatile.


Our financial performance depends on the equipment and facilities in our distribution system being operational.


Weather conditions, accidents, catastrophic events, and failures of equipment or facilities can disrupt or limit our ability to deliver electricity and gas. Efforts to repair or replace equipment and facilities may not be successful, or we may be unable to make the necessary improvements to our distribution system, causing service interruptions. The resulting interruption of services could result in lost revenues and additional costs.


We face construction risk in connection with the completion of generating units.


We have assumed risks under the agreements related to our ownership interest in two 615 MW coal-fired generating units in Oak Creek, Wisconsin. The first unit has entered commercial operation; however, the second unit is subject to construction risks over which we will have limited or no control and which might adversely affect project costs and completion time. These risks include but are not limited to the failure of the general contractor or subcontractors to perform under their contracts; strikes; adverse weather conditions; the inability to obtain necessary permits in a timely manner, legal challenges and appeals to granted permits, changes in applicable laws or regulations; governmental actions; and events in the global economy. In addition, if the units' final construction costs exceed the fixed costs allowed in the PSCW order, this excess will not be recoverable from MGE or its customers unless specifically allowed by the PSCW. Any Oak Creek project costs above the authorized amount, but below a 5% cap, will be subject to a prudence determination made by the PSCW.


Financial Risk


We are exposed to commodity price risk relating to our purchases of natural gas, electricity, coal and oil.


We face commodity price risk exposure with respect to our purchases of natural gas, electricity, coal and oil, SO2 allowances and risk through our use of derivatives, such as futures, forwards and swaps, to manage that commodity price risk. We could experience increased costs as a result of volatility in the market values of those commodities. We could also experience losses on our derivative contracts as a result of that market value volatility or if a counterparty fails to perform under a contract. In the absence of actively quoted market prices and pricing information from external sources, the valuation of these derivative contracts involves our exercise of judgment and use of estimates. As a result, changes in the underlying assumptions or use of alternative valuation methods could affect the reported fair value of these contracts.




20




We are exposed to interest rate risk.


We are exposed to interest rate risk on our variable rate financing. MGE Energy had $114.5 million of variable-rate debt outstanding at December 31, 2009, including $33.5 million for MGE. Borrowing levels under commercial paper arrangements vary from period to period depending upon capital investments and other factors. Such interest rate risk means that we are exposed to increased financing costs and associated cash payments as a result of changes in the short-term interest rates. Also, interest rates affect discount rates which are a key assumption for our defined benefit pension plans and may impact the amount of expense and timing of contributions to the plan.


Market performance affects our employee benefit plan asset values.


The performance of the capital markets affects the values of the assets that are held in trust to satisfy the future obligations under our pension and postretirement benefit plans. We have significant obligations in these areas and hold significant assets in these trusts. A decline in the market value of those assets may increase our current and longer-term funding requirements for these obligations. Changes in the value of trust fund assets may affect the level of required contributions to these trusts to meet benefit obligations. Reduced benefit plan assets could result in increased benefit costs in future years and may increase the amount and accelerate the timing of required future funding contributions.


We are exposed to credit risk primarily through our regulated energy business.


Credit risk is the loss that may result from counterparty nonperformance. We face credit risk primarily through MGE's regulated energy business. Failure of contractual counterparties to perform their obligations under purchase power agreements, commodity supply arrangements or other agreements may result in increased expenses for MGE as a result of being forced to cover the shortfall in the spot or short-term market, where prices may be more volatile.


As a holding company, we are dependent on upstream cash flows from our subsidiaries for the payment of dividends on our common stock.


As a holding company, we have no operations of our own, our ability to pay dividends on our common stock is dependent on the earnings and cash flows of our operating subsidiaries and their ability to pay upstream dividends or to repay funds to us. Prior to funding us, our subsidiaries have financial obligations that must be satisfied, including among others, debt service and obligations to trade creditors, and are subject to contractual and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends.


Disruptions in the financial markets may affect our ability to finance at a reasonable cost and in accordance with our planned schedule.


The credit markets have experienced some disruption and uncertainty during the past year. To the extent that such issues affect the ability or willingness of credit providers or investors to participate in the credit markets or particular types of investments, or affect their perception of the risk associated with particular types of investments, our cost of borrowing could be affected.


General economic conditions may affect our operating revenues, our capital costs and our counterparty risks.


Operational

MGE Energy's and MGE's operations are affected by local, national and worldwide economic conditions. The consequences of a prolonged period of reduced economic activity may include lower demand for energy, uncertainty regarding energy prices and the capital and commodity markets, and increased credit risk. A decline in energy consumption may adversely affect our revenues and future growth. Increased credit risk reflects the risk that our retail customers will not pay their bills in a timely manner or at all, which may lead to a reduction in liquidity and an eventual increase in bad debt expense.


Liquidity

Long-term instability in the financial markets, as a result of recession or otherwise, also may affect the cost of capital and our ability to raise capital. Although MGE Energy and MGE believe they have sufficient liquidity despite the disruption of capital and credit markets, the costs of such funds may increase.




21




Counterparty creditworthiness

Credit risk also includes the risk that trading counterparties that owe us money or product will breach their obligations. MGE's risk management policy is to limit transactions to a group of high quality counterparties. Should the counterparties to these arrangements fail to perform, we may be forced to enter into alternative arrangements. In that event, our financial results could be adversely affected and we could incur losses.


Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.


MGE Energy and MGE


None.


Item 2. Properties.


Electric Generation


Net summer rated capacity in service at December 31, 2009, was as follows:


Plants

 

Location

 

Commercial

Operation Date

 

Fuel

 

Net Summer Rated Capacity (1)

(MW)

 

No. of

Units

Steam plants:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Columbia

 

Portage, WI

 

1975 & 1978

 

Low-sulfur coal

 

225(2,3)

 

2

Blount

 

Madison, WI

 

1957 & 1961

 

Coal/gas

 

97(4,9)

 

2

 

 

 

 

1938 & 1943

 

Gas

 

39(9)

 

2

 

 

 

 

1949

 

Coal/gas

 

22(4,9)

 

1

 

 

 

 

1964-1968

 

Gas

 

29(9)

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WCCF

 

Madison, WI

 

2005

 

Gas/oil

 

130(5,6)

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Combustion turbines

 

Madison, WI

Marinette, WI

 

1964-2000

 

Gas/oil

 

174(10)

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Portable generators

 

Madison, WI

 

1998-2001

 

Diesel

 

50(9)

 

54

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wind turbines

 

Townships of Lincoln and Red River, WI

 

1999

 

Wind

 

2(7,9)

 

17

 

 

Township of Brookfield, IA

 

2008

 

Wind

 

4(8,9)

 

18

Total

772

 

 


(1) Net summer rated capacity is determined by annual testing and may vary from year to year due to, among other things, the operating and physical conditions of the units.


(2) Baseload generation.


(3) MGE's 22% share of two 512-MW units. The other owners are WPL (a subsidiary of Alliant), which operates Columbia, and WPSC.


(4) On January 19, 2006, MGE announced that it would cease coal-fired generation at Blount in 2011, subject to certain conditions, including regulatory approvals.


(5) Facility is jointly owned. MGE Power West Campus owns a controlling interest in the electric generation plant and the UW owns a controlling interest in the chilled-water and steam plants. MGE leases the electric generating assets owned by MGE Power West Campus and is responsible for operating the facility. Amounts shown represent MGE's share of the net summer rated capacity.


(6) Based on the terms of the joint plant agreement between MGE and the UW, the UW has the ability to reduce net capability of these units by approximately 17 MW in the summer. The net summer rated capacity shown reflects this decrease.




22




(7) Nameplate capacity rating is 11 MW.


(8) Nameplate capacity rating is 30 MW.


(9) These facilities are owned by MGE.


(10) Three facilities are owned by MGE and three facilities are leased.


Electric and Gas Distribution Facilities


Major electric distribution lines and substations in service at December 31, 2009, which are owned by MGE, are as follows:


 

Miles

Distribution lines:

Overhead

 

Underground

13.8 kV and under

911

 

1,071

 

 

 

 

Distribution:

Substations

 

Installed Capacity (kVA)

69-13.8 kV

27

 

1,019,000

13.8-4 kV

29

 

282,967


Gas facilities include 2,449 miles of distribution mains, which are owned by MGE.


A significant portion of MGE's electric and gas distribution facilities is located above or underneath highways, streets, other public places or property that others own. MGE believes that it has satisfactory rights to use those places or property in the form of permits, grants, easements and licenses; however, it has not necessarily undertaken to examine the underlying title to the land upon which the rights rest.


Encumbrances


The principal plants and properties of MGE are subject to the lien of its Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust dated as of January 1, 1946, as amended and supplemented, under which MGE's first mortgage bonds are issued. As of December 31, 2009, there were $1.2 million of first mortgage bonds outstanding. See Footnote 9 for additional information regarding MGE's first mortgage bonds.


MGE Power West Campus has collaterally assigned its right to lease payments from MGE for the WCCF in order to secure the repayment of $50 million of senior secured notes issued by MGE Power West Campus. See Footnote 9 for additional information regarding these senior notes.


Item 3. Legal Proceedings.


MGE Energy and MGE


MGE Energy and its subsidiaries, including MGE, from time to time are involved in various legal proceedings that are handled and defended in the ordinary course of business. While MGE Energy and MGE are unable to predict the outcome of these matters, management does not believe, based upon currently available facts, that the ultimate resolution of any of such proceedings would have a material adverse effect on their overall financial condition or results of operations.


Also see "Environmental" under Item 1, Business, and Footnote 18d for a description of several environmental proceedings involving MGE. See Footnote 18i for a description of other legal matters.


Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.


MGE Energy and MGE


None.




23




PART II.


Item 5. Market for Registrants' Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.


Market for Common Equity


MGE Energy


MGE Energy common stock is traded on Nasdaq under the symbol MGEE. On February 1, 2010, there were approximately 18,409 shareholders of record, including registered and beneficial shareholders. The following table shows high and low sale prices for the common stock on Nasdaq for each quarter over the past two years.


 

Common stock price range

2009

 

Common stock price range

2008

 

High

 

Low

 

High

 

Low

Fourth quarter

$36.97

 

$33.41

 

$36.50

 

$27.87

Third quarter

$38.23

 

$33.40

 

$36.40

 

$31.64

Second quarter

$34.00

 

$29.42

 

$36.35

 

$32.60

First quarter

$33.49

 

$27.27

 

$36.00

 

$29.85


MGE


As of February 1, 2010, there were 17,347,894 outstanding shares of common stock, all of which were held by MGE Energy. There is no market for shares of common stock of MGE.


Dividends


MGE Energy


The following table sets forth MGE Energy's quarterly cash dividends per share declared during 2009 and 2008:


(Per share)

2009

 

2008

Fourth quarter

$0.368

 

$0.362

Third quarter

$0.368

 

$0.362

Second quarter

$0.362

 

$0.355

First quarter

$0.362

 

$0.355


MGE


The following table sets forth MGE's quarterly cash dividends declared during 2009 and 2008:


(In thousands)

2009

 

2008

Fourth quarter

$ 6,478

 

$ -

Third quarter

$ 6,478

 

$ -

Second quarter

$ 6,361

 

$ -

First quarter

$ -

 

$ -


See discussion below as well as the "Liquidity and Capital Resources - Financing Activities" under Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for a description of restrictions applicable to dividend payments by MGE.




24




Dividend Restrictions


Dividend payments by MGE to MGE Energy are subject to restrictions arising under a PSCW rate order and, to a lesser degree, MGE's first mortgage bonds. The PSCW order limits the amount of dividends that MGE may pay MGE Energy when its common equity ratio, calculated in the manner used in the rate proceeding, is less than 55%. Under those circumstances, MGE may not pay dividends in excess of $31.4 million plus dividends on shares issued in excess of the shares issued in the rate proceeding forecast if the proceeds are invested in MGE. MGE's thirteen month rolling average common equity ratio at December 31, 2009, is estimated to be 57.5% as determined under the calculation used in the rate proceeding. MGE paid cash dividends of $19.3 million to MGE Energy in 2009.The rate proceeding calculation includes as indebtedness imputed amounts for MGE's outstanding purchase power capacity payments and other PSCW adjustments, but does not include the indebtedness associated with MGE Power West Campus, which is consolidated into MGE's financial statements and will not include the indebtedness associated with MGE Power Elm Road, which will be consolidated into MGE's financial Statements.


MGE has covenanted with the holders of its first mortgage bonds not to declare or pay any dividend or make any other distribution on or purchase any shares of its common stock unless, after giving effect thereto, the aggregate amount of all such dividends and distributions and all amounts applied to such purchases, after December 31, 1945, shall not exceed the earned surplus (retained earnings) accumulated subsequent to December 31, 1945. As of December 31, 2009, approximately $229.0 million was available for the payment of dividends under this covenant.


Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities


MGE Energy


Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Period

Total Number

of

Shares Purchased

Average Price Paid

per Share

Total Number of Shares

Purchased as Part of

Publicly Announced

Plans or Programs*

Maximum Number (or

Approximate Dollar

Value) of Shares That

May Yet Be Purchased

Under the Plans or

Programs*

October 1-31, 2009

72,435

$35.82

-

-

November 1-30, 2009

36,990

35.70

-

-

December 1-31, 2009

21,500

36.30

-

-

Total

130,925

$35.87

-

-


* Under the Stock Plan, common stock shares deliverable to plan participants may be either newly issued shares or shares purchased on the open market, as determined from time to time by MGE Energy. In June 2009, MGE Energy switched to using open market purchases to provide shares to meet obligations to participants in the Stock Plan. The shares are purchased on the open market through a securities broker-dealer and then are reissued under the Stock Plan as needed to meet share delivery requirements. The volume and timing of share repurchases in the open market depends upon the level of dividend reinvestment and optional share purchases being made from time to time by plan participants. As a result, there is no specified maximum number of shares to be repurchased and no specified termination date for the repurchases. All shares issued through the Stock Plan, whether newly issued or reissued following open market purchases, are issued and sold pursuant to a registration statement that was filed with the SEC and is currently effective.


MGE


None.




25

26




Item 6. Selected Financial Data.


MGE Energy

(In thousands, except per-share amounts)


 

For the years ended December 31,

Summary of Operations

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

Operating revenues:


 


 


 


 


Regulated electric

$332,324

 

$345,962

 

$334,488

 

$318,912

 

$310,984

Regulated gas

192,334

 

242,598

 

197,925

 

185,226

 

200,533

Nonregulated

9,161

 

7,433

 

5,181

 

3,408

 

1,853

Total

533,819

 

595,993

 

537,594

 

507,546

 

513,370

Operating expenses

431,296

 

491,418

 

438,156

 

413,150

 

439,629

Other general taxes

17,858

 

16,793

 

15,771

 

15,402

 

13,269

Operating income

84,665

 

87,782

 

83,667

 

78,994

 

60,472

Other income, net

8,096

 

8,044

 

6,069

 

4,329

 

4,938

Interest expense, net

(13,594)

 

(14,002)

 

(13,056)

 

(15,001)

 

(13,448)

Income before taxes

79,167

 

81,824

 

76,680

 

68,322

 

51,962

Income tax (provision) benefit

(28,170)

 

(29,056)

 

(27,855)

 

(25,899)

 

(19,871)

Net income

$50,997

 

$52,768

 

$48,825

 

$42,423

 

$32,091

Average shares outstanding

23,070

 

22,197

 

21,520

 

20,564

 

20,436

Basic and diluted earnings per share

$2.21

 

$2.38

 

$2.27

 

$2.06

 

$1.57

Dividends declared per share

$1.46

 

$1.43

 

$1.41

 

$1.39

 

$1.37

 


 


 


 

 

 


Assets


 


 


 

 

 


Electric

$695,897

 

$677,540

 

$614,949

 

$547,150

 

$533,896

Gas

249,610

 

284,211

 

234,002

 

228,639

 

233,841

Assets not allocated

22,342

 

14,642

 

14,876

 

10,472

 

19,868

Nonregulated energy operations

292,101

 

271,568

 

227,415

 

177,234

 

143,101

Transmission investments

51,728

 

46,292

 

40,808

 

38,470

 

35,239

All others

389,744

 

381,433

 

342,491

 

298,261

 

276,565

Eliminations

(419,537)

 

(407,411)

 

(362,954)

 

(319,792)

 

(326,046)

Total

$1,281,885

 

$1,268,275

 

$1,111,587

 

$980,434

 

$916,464

 


 


 


 

 

 


Capitalization including Short-Term Debt


 


 


 

 

 


Common shareholders' equity

$501,795

 

$478,202

 

$427,726

 

$375,348

 

$343,883

Long-term debt*

322,470

 

272,408

 

262,346

 

252,284

 

222,312

Short-term debt

64,500

 

124,500

 

103,500

 

57,000

 

82,500

 Total Capitalization and Short-term

 Debt

$888,765

 

$875,110

 

$793,572

 

$684,632

 

$648,695

27




Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.


General


MGE Energy is an investor-owned public utility holding company operating through subsidiaries in five business segments:


·

Electric utility operations, conducted through MGE,

·

Gas utility operations, conducted through MGE,

·

Nonregulated energy operations, conducted through MGE Power and its subsidiaries,

·

Transmission investments, representing our equity investment in ATC, and

·

All other, which includes corporate operations and services as well as certain construction services.


Our principal subsidiary is MGE, which generates and distributes electric energy, distributes natural gas, and represents a majority portion of our assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. MGE generates and distributes electricity to approximately 138,000 customers in Dane County, Wisconsin, including the city of Madison, and purchases and distributes natural gas to approximately 142,000 customers in the Wisconsin counties of Columbia, Crawford, Dane, Iowa, Juneau, Monroe, and Vernon.


Our nonregulated energy operations own interests in new electric generating capacity that is leased to MGE. The ownership/leasing structure was adopted under applicable state regulatory guidelines for MGE's participation in these generation facilities, consisting principally of a stable return on the equity investment in the new generation facilities over the term of the related leases. The nonregulated energy operations include partial ownership of a cogeneration project on the UW-Madison campus and an undivided 8.33% ownership interest in two 615 MW coal-fired generating units in Oak Creek, Wisconsin, one of which entered commercial operation on February 2, 2010 and the other of which is expected to enter commercial operation in August 2010. MGE operates the cogeneration project, and a third party operates the units in Oak Creek. Due to the nature of MGE's participation in these facilities, the results of our nonregulated operations are also consolidated into MGE's consolidated financial position and results of operations under applicable accounting standards.


Our primary focus today and for the foreseeable future is our core utility customers at MGE as well as creating long-term value for shareholders. MGE continues to face the challenge of providing its customers with reliable power at competitive prices. MGE plans to meet this challenge by investing in more efficient generation projects, including renewable energy sources. In the future, MGE will continue to focus on growing earnings while controlling operating and fuel costs. MGE will continue to maintain safe and efficient operations in addition to providing customer value. We believe it is critical to maintain a strong credit standing consistent with financial strength in MGE as well as the parent company in order to accomplish these goals.


Overview


We earn our revenue and generate cash from operations by providing electric and natural gas utility services, including electric power generation and electric power and gas distribution. The earnings and cash flows from the utility business are sensitive to various external factors, including:


·

Weather, and its impact on customer sales of electricity and gas,

·

Economic conditions, including current business activity and employment and their impact on customer demand,

·

Regulation and regulatory issues,

·

Energy commodity prices,

·

Equity price risk pertaining to pension related assets,

·

Credit market conditions, including interest rates and our debt credit rating,

·

Environmental laws and regulations, including pending environmental rule changes,

·

Construction risk in connection with the remaining Elm Road generating unit,


and other factors listed in "Item 1A. Risk Factors."


For the year ended December 31, 2009, MGE Energy's earnings were $51.0 million or $2.21 per share compared to $52.8 million or $2.38 per share for the same period in the prior year. MGE's earnings for the year ended December 31, 2009, were $35.9 million compared to $37.6 million for the same period in the prior year.




28




MGE Energy's income was derived from our business segments as follows:


(In millions)

Year Ended December 31,

Business Segment:

2009

 

2008

 

2007

Electric Utility

$23.9

 

$25.7

 

$29.5

Gas Utility

9.9

 

9.8

 

5.9

Nonregulated Energy

11.1

 

10.1

 

8.8

Transmission Investments

4.9

 

4.3

 

3.6

All Other

1.2

 

2.9

 

1.0

Net Income

$51.0

 

$52.8

 

$48.8


Our net income during 2009 primarily reflects the effects of the following factors:


·

A 3.9% decrease in electric revenue, reflecting lower customer demand primarily as a result of cooler-than-normal weather. According to the National Weather Service, July 2009 was the coolest on record in Madison, where MGE's primary service territory resides. Cooling degree days (a measure for determining the impact of weather during the cooling season) for 2009 decreased by 32% compared to 2008. Reduced economic activity also contributed to the reduced demand for service.


·

Retail gas sales were relatively flat compared to last year. In 2008, the gas utility had expensed a $1.3 million settlement (excludes premium) associated with a weather hedge (heating degree collar) as a result of colder-than-normal weather. The gas utility had no weather hedges during 2009.


·

Higher nonregulated energy revenues primarily attributable to higher carrying costs being recognized for the Elm Road Units. Carrying costs during construction of the nonregulated energy projects, related to the equity portion, are recognized over the period of time the costs are recovered in rates.


·

A $0.6 million increase in earnings from our interest in ATC.


·

A decline in the All Other segment is primarily attributable to gains on sales of investments recognized in the year ended December 31, 2008.


Our net income during 2008 primarily reflects the effects of the following factors:


·

A 3.4% increase in electric revenues, reflecting a 4.8% rate increase approved by the PSCW, effective January 1, 2008, offset by lower demand due to cooler summer weather and lower sales for resale due to decreased sales opportunities.


·

Higher gas revenues, reflecting a 14.8% increase in delivered retail gas volumes due to colder winter weather and a 2.8% rate increase approved by the PSCW, effective January 1, 2008, partially offset by a $1.3 million expense (excludes premium) in 2008 on a settlement of a weather hedge (heating degree day collar) as a result of the colder weather. The weather hedge obligated MGE to pay additional costs if the weather was colder than a prescribed ceiling or would have compensated MGE if weather was warmer than a prescribed floor.


·

Higher nonregulated energy revenues primarily attributable to higher carrying costs, due to the greater capital investment, recognized for the Elm Road Units. Carrying costs during construction of the nonregulated energy projects, related to the equity portion, are recognized over the period of time the costs are recovered in rates.


·

A $0.7 million increase in earnings from our interest in ATC.


·

$2.9 million in earnings due to interdepartmental interest income recognized as a result of capitalized interest on the Elm Road Units and gains on sales of certain investments.


During 2009, the following events occurred:


ATC: MGE Transco contributed $3.6 million for voluntary capital contributions to ATC for the year ended December 31, 2009. An additional voluntary capital contribution of $0.5 million was made in January 2010.




29




WCCF: The State of Wisconsin did not exercise its option under the WCCF Joint Ownership Agreement to acquire from us a 45 MW interest in WCCF or to enter into a purchase power agreement for 45 MW of capacity. This option expired in the second quarter of 2009.


Elm Road Construction Claim: As described in Footnote 21, in December 2009, the project contractor for the Elm Road Units settled the claims initially made in December 2008. MGE Energy additional project costs decreased from the original claim of $39 million to $5.4 million. In addition, the project contractor will receive 120 days of schedule relief for Unit 1 and 60 days for Unit 2. Therefore, the guaranteed contract date of September 29, 2009, for Unit 1 was extended to January 27, 2010, and the guaranteed contract date of September 29, 2010, for Unit 2 was extended to November 28, 2010.


Wind Development Rights: In June 2009, MGE Energy, through its subsidiary MAGAEL, LLC, entered into agreements to purchase land development rights, including land option agreements, electrical interconnection rights, wind data, engineering plans, licenses, permits, and governmental approvals for two wind development sites. These wind development rights may potentially be used to develop wind farms in three counties in Iowa with a capacity up to approximately 175 MWs; however, neither MAGAEL nor MGE Energy has any obligation to build any wind generators at these sites.


2009 Fuel Credit: In May 2009, the PSCW approved an interim order authorizing MGE to implement an electric fuel credit, subject to refund with interest at 10.8%. In the year ended December 31, 2009, this fuel credit resulted in a $4.1 million reduction to electric revenues.


2008 Fuel Refund: As a result of lower-than-expected fuel and purchased power costs in 2008, a fuel refund was approved by the PSCW. The PSCW completed their audit and issued a final order in March 2009, which applied a $5.7 million (includes interest) refund to customers' accounts.


2010 Rate Filing: In December 2009, the PSCW authorized MGE to increase 2010 rates for retail electric customers by 3.3% and decrease rates for gas customers by 0.74%. The increase in retail electric rates was primarily driven by costs for MGE's share of the Elm Road Units and transmission reliability enhancements.


During 2010, several items may affect us, including:


·

General economic conditions: Economic conditions both inside and outside our service area are expected to continue to affect the level of demand for our utility services and may affect the collection of our accounts receivable and the creditworthiness of counterparties with whom we do business.


·

Credit Agreements: We have in place lines of credit aggregating $195 million for MGE Energy (including MGE) and $75 million for MGE to address our liquidity needs. Of the lines for MGE, $20 million expires in March 2010 and $55 million expires in December 2010. We do not expect any difficulties in replacing these lines of credit. Of the lines for MGE Energy, $40 million expires in August 2010 and $80 million expires in December 2010. MGE Energy's lines of credit have been used to help finance the Elm Road Units. Since a majority of Elm Road has been financed, the levels of credit needed in 2010 are expected to be lower. However, we expect that the borrowing costs will be higher under the replacement facilities than under the lines that expire in December 2010.


·

Elm Road Units: On February 2, 2010, Elm Road Unit 1 entered commercial operation, and Elm Road Unit 2 is expected to enter commercial operation in August 2010. On February 4, 2010, our subsidiary, MGE Power Elm Road, which owns an ownership interest in those Units, issued $50 million of its 5.04% senior secured notes. The proceeds of those notes were used to repay borrowings under our credit facilities. As a result, our outstanding borrowings and our borrowing needs are expected to be lower during 2010.


·

Smart Grid Investment Grant: MGE has been awarded a $5.5 million grant for smart grid technology from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under the federal stimulus program. The DOE grant requires MGE to match 50% bringing the total cost to more than $11 million. The projects are expected to begin in early 2010.


·

Environmental Initiatives: There is proposed legislation, rules and initiatives involving matters related to air emissions, water effluent and greenhouse gases, all of which affect generation plant capital expenditures and operating costs as well as future operational planning. Such legislation could significantly affect the costs of owning and operating fossil-fueled generating plants, such as Columbia and Elm Road, from which we derive approximately 29% of our electricity generating capacity. We would expect to seek recovery on any such costs in rates; however, it is difficult to estimate the amount of such costs due to the uncertainty as to the timing and form of the legislation and regulations, and the scope and time of the recovery of costs in rates.



30




The following discussion is based on the business segments as discussed in Footnote 23.


Results of Operations


Year Ended December 31, 2009, Versus the Year Ended December 31, 2008


Electric sales and revenues


The following table compares MGE's electric revenues and electric kWh sales by customer class for each of the periods indicated:


 

Revenues

 

Sales

(In thousands, except cooling degree days)

2009

2008

% Change

 

2009

2008

% Change

Residential

$109,788

$117,241

(6.4)%


772,724

810,414

(4.7)%

Commercial

176,231

186,910

(5.7)%


1,765,831

1,838,080

(3.9)%

Industrial

16,906

19,463

(13.1)%


253,590

273,657

(7.3)%

Other - retail/municipal

31,010

31,685

(2.1)%


402,994

405,008

(0.5)%

Total retail

333,935

355,299

(6.0)%


3,195,139

3,327,159

(4.0)%

Sales for resale

2,086

5,303

(60.7)%


14,993

53,733

(72.1)%

Other revenues

(3,697)

(14,640)

74.7%


-

-

-

Total

$332,324

$345,962

(3.9)%


3,210,132

3,380,892

(5.1)%

 








Cooling degree days (normal 626)





368

538

(31.6)%


Electric operating revenues decreased $13.6 million or 3.9% for the year ended December 31, 2009, due to the following:

(In millions)

 

Volume

$(13.8)

Rate changes

(7.6)

Sales for resale

(3.2)

Other revenues

11.0

Total

$(13.6)


·

Volume. During the year ended December 31, 2009, there was a 4% decrease in total retail sales volumes when compared to the same period in the prior year, as a result of cooler-than-normal weather. The demand for electricity is affected by weather conditions. According to the National Weather Service, July 2009 was the coolest on record in Madison, where MGE's primary service territory resides. Cooling degree days for 2009 decreased by 32% compared to 2008. Reduced economic activity also contributed to the reduced demand for service.


·

Rates changes. Rates charged to retail customers for the year ended December 31, 2009, were 2.1% or $7.6 million lower than those charged during the same period in the prior year.


On December 18, 2008, under a limited reopener, the PSCW authorized MGE to decrease 2009 rates for retail electric customers by 0.74% or $2.7 million from 2008. The decrease in retail electric rates is driven by a decrease in fuel and purchased power costs, a decrease in costs associated with the Elm Road Units and a decrease in ATC transmission costs. The PSCW also approved deferred accounting for incremental pension and other postretirement benefit costs above the levels currently included in rates.


As a result of lower than expected fuel and purchased power costs in 2008, a fuel refund was approved by the PSCW. In March 2009, the PSCW completed their audit of 2008 electric fuel costs and issued a final order approving the amount to be refunded to customers. A refund of $5.7 million (includes interest) was applied to customers' accounts in March 2009. See "Other revenues" discussion below for more information on this refund.


In May 2009, the PSCW approved an interim order authorizing MGE to implement a credit of $0.00204 per kWh, due to a decrease in actual electric fuel costs, when compared to those fuel costs projected in MGE's most recent rate order. During the year ended December 31, 2009, $4.1 million had been credited to electric customers. See "Other revenues" discussion below for more information on this interim order.


In 2008, the PSCW approved a $0.00239 per kWh interim fuel surcharge subject to refund, with interest, on MGE's electric rates to cover increased fuel and purchased power expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2008, this interim surcharge resulted in a $5.1 million increase to electric rates. See "Other revenues" below for additional information on this interim fuel surcharge.



31




·

Sales for resale. Sales for resale represent wholesale sales made to third parties who are not ultimate users of the electricity. These sales may include spot market transactions on the markets operated by MISO or PJM. These sales may also include bilateral sales to other utilities or power marketers. Generating units are dispatched by MISO based on cost considerations as well as reliability of the system. Sales for resale typically occur when MGE has more generation and purchases online than is needed for its own system demand. The excess electricity is then sold to others in the market. For the year ended December 31, 2009, sales for resale decreased $3.2 million when compared to the same period in the prior year, reflecting decreased opportunities for sales.


·

Other revenues. Other electric revenues increased $11.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the same period in the prior year.


As a result of the refund provision in the May 2008 interim fuel surcharge order, MGE recognized an estimated refund to customers totaling $5.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2008, and reflected this reduction in other electric revenues. During the year ended December 31, 2009, MGE recorded $5.5 million in other electric revenues to offset the impact of the 2008 fuel refund.


Also included in other revenues for the year ended December 31, 2009, is a $0.3 million projected refund which was accrued related to the May 2009 interim order.


Other electric revenues reflect the elimination of WCCF and Elm Road carrying costs that were collected in electric rates, which are recognized as nonregulated energy operating revenues in our Nonregulated Energy Operations segment. The amount eliminated was $10.7 million and $11.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.


Electric fuel and purchased power


As a result of more favorable prices for purchased power as compared to internal generation, power purchases were increased, and internal generation reduced, causing fuel for electric generation to decrease and purchased power expense to increase.


The expense for fuel for electric generation decreased $17.9 million or 32.6% during the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the same period in the prior year. This decrease in expense reflects a $12.8 million decrease related to the lower electric generation and a $5.1 million decrease related to fuel cost.


Purchased power expense increased by $10.4 million or 14.0% during the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase in expense reflects an $18.2 million or 27.3% increase in the volume of power purchased offset by a $7.8 million or 10.5% decrease in the per-unit cost of purchased power.


Electric operating and maintenance expenses


Electric operating and maintenance expenses decreased $4.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008. The following changes contributed to the net change:


(In millions)

 

Decreased production costs

$(2.8)

Decreased maintenance expenses

(2.2)

Decreased customer accounts costs

(0.6)

Decreased distribution costs

(0.3)

Decreased general and administrative costs

(0.2)

Increased transmission costs

1.5

Total

$(4.6)


For the year ended December 31, 2009, production costs and maintenance costs decreased due to lower internal generation, compared to the same period in the prior year. In addition, customer accounts costs decreased due to lower uncollectible accounts expense. Transmission costs increased primarily due to network service fees pertaining to ATC.


Electric depreciation expense


Electric depreciation expense increased $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the same period in the prior year as a result of additional electric plant assets.



32




Gas Utility Operations - MGE Energy and MGE


Gas deliveries and revenues


The following table compares MGE's gas revenues and gas therms delivered by customer class during each of the periods indicated:


(In thousands, except HDD and average rate per therm of retail customer)

Revenues

 

Therms Delivered

2009

2008

%

Change

 

2009

2008

% Change

Residential

$105,624

$130,012

(18.8)%


95,718

100,014

(4.3)%

Commercial/industrial

81,335

106,582

(23.7)%


111,276

107,329

3.7%

Total retail

186,959

236,594

(21.0)%


206,994

207,343

(0.2)%

Gas transportation

2,903

2,903

0.0%


37,611

37,053

1.5%

Other revenues

2,472

3,101

(20.3)%


-

-

-

Total

 $192,334

 $242,598

(20.7)%


244,605

244,396

0.1%

Heating degree days (normal 7,107)


 


 

7,357

7,716

(4.7)%

Average rate per therm of retail customer

$0.903

$1.141

(20.9)%

 

 

 



Gas revenues decreased $50.3 million or 20.7% for the year ended December 31, 2009. These changes are related to the following factors:


(In millions)

 

Gas costs/rates

$(49.3)

Transportation and other effects

(0.7)

Gas deliveries

(0.3)

Total

$(50.3)


·

Gas costs/rates. The average retail rate per therm for the year ended December 31, 2009, decreased 20.9% compared to the same period in 2008. The primary contributor to this decrease is significantly lower natural gas costs.


·

Transportation and other revenues. Transportation and other revenues decreased a total of $0.7 million primarily due to a decrease in income realized under the GCIM.


Under MGE's GCIM, if actual gas commodity savings and capacity release revenues are above or below a benchmark set by the PSCW, then MGE's gas sales service customers and shareholders share in any increased costs or savings per percentages set by the PSCW. For the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, shareholders received the benefit of $1.9 million and $2.4 million, respectively, from capacity release revenues and commodity savings under the GCIM.


Cost of gas sold


For the year ended December 31, 2009, cost of gas sold decreased by $48.5 million, compared to the same period in the prior year. The cost per therm of natural gas decreased 27.6% which resulted in $46.9 million of reduced expense. In addition, a 0.9% decrease in the volume of gas purchased resulted in $1.6 million less expense.


Gas operating and maintenance expenses


Gas operating and maintenance expenses decreased $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the same period a year ago. The following changes contributed to the net change.


(In millions)

2009

Decreased customer accounts costs

$(0.7)

Decreased distribution costs

(0.3)

Decreased maintenance costs

(0.3)

Decreased general and administrative costs

(0.2)

Decreased production costs

(0.1)

Decreased customer service costs

(0.1)

Total

$(1.7)




33




Customer accounts costs decreased due to lower uncollectible accounts expense.


Gas depreciation expense


Gas depreciation expense increased $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the same period in the prior year as a result of additional gas plant assets.


Other Income (deductions), Net


Other income, net for the gas and electric segments increased $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the same period in the prior year. In 2008, the gas utility had expensed a $1.5 million settlement (includes premium) associated with a weather hedge (heating degree collar) as a result of colder-than-normal weather. The gas utility had no weather hedges during 2009. In addition, charitable contributions decreased by $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the prior year. Offsetting this change is a $0.8 million pretax gain on investments recognized in 2008 and a $0.4 million reduction in AFUDC-equity for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the prior year.


Nonregulated Energy Operations - MGE Energy and MGE


Nonregulated energy operating revenues


Operating revenues from nonregulated energy operations increased $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, when compared to the same period in the prior year. Operating revenues from nonregulated energy operations for both the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, include $14.9 million in interdepartmental revenues related to a leasing arrangement between MGE and MGE Power West Campus. Upon consolidation, these interdepartmental revenues are eliminated.


MGE also received approval from the PSCW to collect carrying costs expected to be incurred by MGE Power Elm Road during construction of the Elm Road Units. MGE estimates that the total carrying costs on the Elm Road Units will be approximately $59.5 million. A portion of this amount is being recognized over the period recovered in rates and a portion is being deferred and will be recognized over the period in which the Units are depreciated. See Footnote 21 for additional information regarding these carrying charges. For the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, MGE Power Elm Road recognized $8.1 million and $6.4 million, respectively, related to carrying costs on the Elm Road Units.


Nonregulated energy interest expense, net


For the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, interest expense, net at the nonregulated energy operations segment was $2.7 million and $2.6 million, respectively. Interest expense at the nonregulated energy segment for both the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, includes $2.8 million in interest expense incurred on $50 million of long-term, fixed-rate borrowings at MGE Power West Campus.


Also included in the nonregulated interest expense is interdepartmental interest expense and capitalized interest at MGE Power Elm Road. During the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, MGE Power Elm Road was charged $3.4 million and $4.8 million, respectively, in interest expense by Corporate on funds borrowed for the Elm Road Units. This expense is eliminated upon consolidation for MGE Energy only. The interest expense at MGE Power Elm Road is offset by $3.4 million and $4.8 million, respectively, in capitalized interest.


During the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, MGE Power Elm Road recorded $0.1 million in interest income on cash advanced to ERS for construction of transmission equipment and work done by ATC related to the Elm Road Units.


Transmission Investment Operations - MGE Energy and MGE


Transmission investment other income


For the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, other income at the transmission investment segment was $8.2 million and $7.2 million, respectively. The transmission investment segment holds our interest in ATC, and its income reflects our equity in the earnings of ATC. See Footnote 4.b for additional information concerning ATC and summarized financial information regarding ATC.



34




All Other - MGE Energy


All other - other income


Other income in the all other segment decreased $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to a $2.5 million pretax gain on investments recognized in the prior year.


All other interest income, net


All other interest income, net for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, was $2.8 million. Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009, represents $3.4 million in interdepartmental interest income from MGE Power Elm Road, partially offset by $0.6 million in interest expense on short-term debt. Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2008, represents $4.8 million in interdepartmental interest income from MGE Power Elm Road, partially offset by $2.0 million in interest expense on short-term debt. The interdepartmental interest income is eliminated upon consolidation.


Consolidated Other General Taxes


MGE Energy's and MGE's other general taxes increased $1.1 million or 6.3% for the year ended December 31, 2009, when compared to the same period in 2008, due to increased Wisconsin license fee tax. The annual license fee tax expense is based on the prior year's adjusted operating revenues. Tax rates have not increased.


Consolidated Income Taxes


MGE Energy's effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2009, is 35.6% compared to 35.5% for the same period in 2008. MGE's effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2009, is 35.4% compared to 35.2% for the same period in the prior year. The effective income tax rate differences for both MGE Energy and MGE for 2009 compared to 2008 are insignificant, as the effective income tax rate components are substantially equivalent.


Under 2009 Wisconsin Act 2, effective for years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, Wisconsin requires corporations to use combined reporting to compute their Wisconsin income for income tax purposes. Formerly, Wisconsin law required each corporation in a combined group to file separate returns. The combined reporting statute in Wisconsin did not have a significant impact on the effective income tax rates of MGE Energy and MGE.


For 2009 tax return purposes, MGE Energy and MGE will change its income tax methods of accounting for repairs based on current Treasury Regulations and case law. The change in income tax methods of accounting involves, among other things, identification of appropriate units of property for repair work and computation of a cumulative one-time tax deduction able to be claimed in 2009. The effect on the 2009 financial statements of the cumulative adjustment is an increase to deferred tax expense and a corresponding decrease in the current tax provision in the amount of about $9.2 million. The tax method change did not have an impact on income before income tax expense in the income statements of MGE Energy and MGE.


Noncontrolling Interest, Net of Tax


The noncontrolling interest, net of tax, reflects the accounting required for MGE Energy's interest in the WCCF and Elm Road Units. MGE Energy owns 100% of MGE Power West Campus and MGE Power Elm Road; however, due to the leasing arrangements for these projects with MGE, the entities are considered VIEs and their results are consolidated with those of MGE, the primary beneficiary of the VIEs. Also included in noncontrolling interest, net of tax, is MGE Energy's interest in MGE Transco.


For the year ended December 31, 2009, MGE Energy (through its wholly owned subsidiary MGE Power) earned $7.6 million and $4.9 million, net of tax, for its interest in MGE Power West Campus and MGE Power Elm Road, respectively. Additionally, MGE Energy earned $1.5 million, net of tax, for its interest in MGE Transco. These amounts are recorded as noncontrolling interest expense, net of tax, on MGE's consolidated statement of income.


For the year ended December 31, 2008, MGE Energy (through its wholly owned subsidiary MGE Power) had earned $7.6 million and $3.9 million, net of tax, for its interest in MGE Power West Campus and MGE Power Elm Road, respectively. Additionally, MGE Energy had earned $0.8 million, net of tax, for its interest in MGE Transco. These amounts are recorded as noncontrolling interest expense, net of tax, on MGE's consolidated statement of income.




35




Year Ended December 31, 2008, Versus the Year Ended December 31, 2007


Electric Utility Operations - MGE Energy and MGE


Electric sales and revenues


The following table compares MGE's electric revenues and electric kWh sales by customer class for each of the periods indicated:


 

Revenues

 

kWh Sales

(In thousands, except cooling degree days)

2008

2007

% Change

 

2008

2007

% Change

Residential

$117,241

$113,161

3.6%

 

810,414

833,549

(2.8)%

Commercial

186,910

173,500

7.7%

 

1,838,080

1,846,335

(0.4)%

Industrial

19,463

17,905

8.7%

 

273,657

284,637

(3.9)%

Other - retail/municipal

31,685

26,859

18.0%

 

405,008

379,785

6.6%

Total retail

355,299

331,425

7.2%

 

3,327,159

3,344,306

(0.5)%

Sales for resale

5,303

7,076

(25.1)%

 

53,733

87,203

(38.4)%

Other revenues

(14,640)

(4,013)

(264.8)%

 

-

-

-

Total

$345,962

$334,488

3.4%

 

3,380,892

3,431,509

(1.5)%

 



 

 




Cooling degree days (normal 641)



 

 

538

781

(31.1)%


Electric operating revenues increased $11.5 million or 3.4% for the year ended December 31, 2008, due to the following:


(In millions)

 

 

 2008

Rate changes

$25.7

Volume

(1.8)

Sales for resale

(1.8)

Other revenues

(10.6)

Total

$11.5


Rates changes. Rates charged to retail customers for the year ended December 31, 2008, were 7.8% or $25.7 million higher than those charged during the same period in the prior year. This increase includes a 4.8% rate increase authorized by the PSCW as well as the surcharge described below.


On December 14, 2007, the PSCW authorized MGE to increase 2008 electric revenue by $16.2 million to cover costs for MGE's new wind energy projects, statewide energy efficiency and renewable energy programs, transmission improvements by ATC, and accelerated costs to discontinue coal use at the Blount Station.


On May 5, 2008, the PSCW approved a $0.00239 per kWh interim fuel surcharge on MGE's electric rates to cover increased fuel and purchased power expenses. During the year ended December 31, 2008, this surcharge resulted in a $5.1 million increase to electric rates. A stipulation between MGE and the intervenors allowed the interim surcharge to remain in effect until the end of the year, but required MGE to review its 2008 monitored fuel costs at year-end and to refund to customers, with interest at 10.8%, any amount by which its actual fuel costs fell short of the monitored fuel costs collected in rates. See "Other revenues" below.


On April 24, 2007, when the PSCW completed their audit of 2006 electric fuel costs and issued a final order on the 2006 fuel credit, $2.4 million (related to 2006 fuel costs and including interest) was applied to customers' accounts.


Electric rates from April 26, 2007 to August 31, 2007, were subject to a $0.00339 per kWh interim fuel surcharge and subject to refund. On August 31, 2007, MGE received a final decision from the PSCW that reduced the fuel surcharge to $0.00242 per kWh effective the date of the order. This fuel surcharge resulted in a $5.6 million increase to electric rates charged to customers during the twelve months ended December 31, 2007.


On December 18, 2008, under a limited reopener, the PSCW authorized MGE to decrease 2009 rates for retail electric customers by 0.74% or $2.7 million from 2008. The decrease in retail electric rates is driven by a decrease in fuel and purchased power costs, decrease in costs associated with the Elm Road Units and a decrease in ATC transmission costs. The PCSW also approved deferred accounting for incremental pension and other postretirement benefit costs above the levels currently included in rates.



36




Volume. During the year ended December 31, 2008, total retail sales volumes were comparable to the same period in the prior year. Higher usage by other-retail/municipal customers was offset by a decline in residential, commercial and industrial usage.


Sales for resale. Sales for resale represent wholesale sales made to third parties who are not ultimate users of the electricity. These sales may include spot market transactions on the markets operated by MISO or PJM. These sales may also include bilateral sales to other utilities or power marketers. Generating units are dispatched by MISO based on cost considerations as well as reliability of the system. Sales for resale typically occur when MGE has more generation and purchases online than is needed for its own system demand. The excess electricity is then sold to others in the market. For the year ended December 31, 2008, sales for resale decreased $1.8 million when compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease is primarily due to increased natural gas costs. During 2008, natural gas prices increased fairly rapidly until July before returning to previous levels. Electric prices on the MISO market did not experience the same price movement. MGE's sales for resale into the MISO market were lower as a result of the higher cost of gas fired generation relative to the market prices of electricity.

Other revenues. Other electric revenues decreased $10.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the same period in the prior year.


During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, MGE recovered in electric rates carrying costs and other fees related to WCCF and Elm Road. During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, MGE recorded a $11.0 million and $8.2 million reduction, respectively, to other electric revenues to transfer the revenues from the electric segment to the nonregulated energy operations segment. See discussion of these revenues in the "nonregulated energy operating revenues" section.


As a result of the refund provisions in the interim fuel surcharge order, MGE has recognized an estimated refund to customers totaling $5.5 million (includes interest) during the year ended December 31, 2008 and has reflected this reduction in other electric revenues.


During the year ended December 31, 2007, other electric revenues included a $2.3 million (excludes interest) upward adjustment to offset the impact on overall electric revenues for the 2006 fuel refund provided to customers in April 2007. Note that this refund was accrued in revenues during 2006, and was returned to customers via a reduction in rates in April 2007. See "Rate changes" above for more information on this refund.


Electric fuel and purchased power


The expense for fuel used for electric generation decreased $1.9 million or 3.4% during the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the same period in the prior year. Lower fuel costs between the two periods resulted in a $1.5 million decrease of this expense and a decline in internal generation resulted in a $0.4 million decrease of this expense.


Purchased power expense decreased by $2.9 million or 3.8% during the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the same period in the prior year. This decrease in expense reflects a $1.1 million or 1.5% decrease in the per-unit cost of purchased power and a $1.8 million or 2.3% decrease in the volume of power purchased.


Electric operating and maintenance expenses


Electric operating and maintenance expenses increased $14.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007. The following changes contributed to the net change:


(In millions)

 2008

Increased production costs

$1.9

Increased transmission costs

4.3

Increased distribution expenses

0.3

Increased customer service costs

4.4

Increased customer accounts costs

0.5

Increased other general and administrative expenses

1.7

Increased maintenance expenses

1.7

Total

$14.8




37




As a result of the 2005 Wisconsin Act 141, each Wisconsin utility is required to pay 1.2% of its annual operating revenues to the statewide energy efficiency and renewable resource programs. MGE is allowed to recover these costs in rates through its conservation escrow. For the year ended December 31, 2008, costs associated with funding these programs increased customer service expense by $5.1 million. Transmission costs increased primarily due to network service fees pertaining to ATC.


Electric depreciation expense


Depreciation expense at the electric segment increased by $6.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, when compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase is related to higher levels of electric assets, including the Top of Iowa III wind-powered electric generating facility, which was placed in service in the first quarter of 2008. Also contributing to the increase is the accelerated depreciation of certain Blount assets. For additional information on the Blount accelerated depreciation, see Footnote 19.


Gas Utility Operations - MGE Energy and MGE


Gas deliveries and revenues


The following table compares MGE's gas revenues and gas therms delivered by customer class during each of the periods indicated:


 

Revenues

 

Therms Delivered

(In thousands, except HDD and average rate per therm)

2008

2007

% Change

 

2008

2007

% Change

Residential

$130,012

$110,046

18.1%

 

100,014

92,218

8.5%

Commercial/industrial

106,582

83,799

27.2%

 

107,329

88,330

21.5%

Total retail

236,594

193,845

22.1%

 

207,343

180,548

14.8%

Gas transportation

2,903

2,623

10.7%

 

37,053

34,645

7.0%

Other revenues

3,101

1,457

112.8%

 

-

-

-

Total

$242,598

$197,925

22.6%

 

244,396

215,193

13.6%

Heating degree days (normal 7,119)

 

 

 

 

7,716

6,935

11.3%

Average rate per therm of retail customer

 

 

 

 

$1.141

$1.074

6.2%


Gas revenues increased $44.7 million or 22.6% for the year ended December 31, 2008. These changes are related to the following factors:


(In millions)

 2008

Gas costs/rates

$12.2

Gas deliveries

30.6

Transportation and other effects

1.9

Total

$44.7


Gas costs/rates. The average retail rate per therm for the year ended December 31, 2008, increased 6.2% compared to the same period in 2007. The PSCW authorized a 2.8% increase in MGE's gas distribution rates effective January 1, 2008, to cover increased system demands and funding statewide energy programs. Also contributing to this increase is higher natural gas costs.


Retail gas deliveries. The 14.8% increase in retail gas deliveries for the year ended December 31, 2008, was attributable to cooler than normal weather, reflected in an 11.3% increase in the heating degree days between the periods, and increased use by a large commercial/industrial customer.


Transportation and other revenues. Transportation and other revenues increased a total of $1.9 million primarily due to an increase in income realized under the GCIM.


Under MGE's GCIM, if actual gas commodity savings and capacity release revenues are above or below a benchmark set by the PSCW, then MGE's gas sales service customers and shareholders share in any increased costs or savings per percentages set by the PSCW. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, shareholders received the benefit of $2.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively, from capacity release revenues and commodity savings under the GCIM.




38




Cost of Gas Sold


For the year ended December 31, 2008, cost of gas sold increased by $30.7 million, compared to the same period in the prior year. The volume of gas purchased increased 13.4% which resulted in $18.9 million of additional expense. In addition, the cost per therm of natural gas increased 7.4% which resulted in $11.8 million of additional expense.


Gas operating and maintenance expenses


Gas operating and maintenance expenses increased $5.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the same period a year ago. The following changes contributed to the net change:


(In millions)

2008

Increased distribution costs

$0.4

Increased customer accounts costs

0.8

Increased customer service costs

3.1

Increased general and administrative costs

0.6

Increased maintenance costs

0.6

Total

$5.5


As a result of the 2005 Wisconsin Act 141, each Wisconsin utility is required to pay 1.2% of its annual operating revenues to the statewide energy efficiency and renewable resource programs. MGE is allowed to recover these costs in rates through its conservation escrow. For the year ended December 31, 2008, costs associated with funding these programs increased customer service expense by $3.6 million.


Gas depreciation expense


Gas depreciation expense increased $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the same period in the prior year.


Other Income (Deductions), Net


During the year ended December 31, 2008, the gas and electric segments incurred $1.7 million in other deductions. The other deductions included a $1.5 million expense for a heating degree day collar, $1.8 million in charitable contributions, a $0.3 million loss related to an equity investment and $0.1 million of net miscellaneous expenses. See Footnote 16 for further discussion of the HDD collar. These deductions were partially offset by income of $0.9 million in AFUDC-equity, a $0.3 million gain on the sale of property, and a $0.8 million gain on investments.


For the year ended December 31, 2007, the gas and electric segments recognized a total of $1.9 million in AFUDC-equity, $0.2 million in equity earnings from miscellaneous investments, and a $0.8 million gain on the sale of investments. This income was offset by $0.3 million in premium expense for a HDD collar, $2.1 million in charitable contributions, and $0.4 million in net miscellaneous expenses.


Interest Expense, Net


For the year ended December 31, 2008, total interest expense for the electric and gas segments increased $1.4 million when compared to the same period in the prior year. For the year ended December 31, 2008, there was a $0.5 million decrease in AFUDC-debt (which is an increase to interest expense), a $0.5 million increase in interest expense on long-term debt, and a $0.6 million increase in net miscellaneous interest expense. These increases in interest expense were offset by a $0.2 million decrease in interest expense on short-term debt.


Nonregulated Energy Operations - MGE Energy and MGE


Nonregulated energy operating revenues


Operating revenues from nonregulated energy operations increased $2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, when compared to the same period in the prior year. Operating revenues from nonregulated energy operations for both the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 include $14.9 million in interdepartmental revenues related to a leasing arrangement between MGE and MGE Power West Campus, which commenced on April 26, 2005. Upon consolidation, these interdepartmental revenues are eliminated.




39




MGE also received approval from the PSCW to collect carrying costs expected to be incurred by MGE Power Elm Road during construction of the Elm Road Units. MGE estimates that the total carrying costs on the Elm Road Units will be $61.3 million. A portion of this amount is being recognized over the period recovered in rates and a portion is being deferred and will be recognized over the period in which the Units are depreciated. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, MGE Power Elm Road recognized $6.4 million and $4.1 million, respectively, related to carrying costs on the Elm Road Units.


Nonregulated energy interest expense, net


For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, interest expense, net at the nonregulated energy operations segment was $2.6 million and $2.5 million, respectively. Interest expense at the nonregulated energy segment for both the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, includes $2.8 million in interest expense incurred on $50 million of long-term, fixed-rate borrowings at MGE Power West Campus.


Also included in the nonregulated interest expense is interdepartmental interest expense and capitalized interest at MGE Power Elm Road. During the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, MGE Power Elm Road was charged $4.8 million and $3.9 million, respectively, in interest expense by Corporate on funds borrowed for the Elm Road Units. This expense is eliminated upon consolidation for MGE Energy only. The interest expense at MGE Power Elm Road is offset by $4.8 million and $3.9 million, respectively, in capitalized interest. MGE Power Elm Road is capitalizing interest on the Elm Road Units.


During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, MGE Power Elm Road recorded $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, in interest income on cash advanced to Elm Road Services, LLC for construction of transmission equipment and work done by ATC related to the Elm Road project.


Transmission Investment Operations - MGE Energy and MGE


For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, other income at the transmission investment segment was $7.2 million and $6.0 million, respectively. The transmission investment segment holds our interest in ATC, and its income reflects our equity in the earnings of ATC. See Footnote 4.b for additional information concerning ATC and summarized financial information regarding ATC.


All Other - MGE Energy


All other - other income, net


The all other segment recorded $2.5 million in other income for the year ended December 31, 2008, primarily due to gains on sales of certain investments.


All other interest income, net


All other interest income, net for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, was $2.8 million and $2.3 million, respectively. Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2008, represents $4.8 million in interdepartmental interest income from MGE Power Elm Road, partially offset by $2.0 million in interest expense on short-term debt. Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2007, represents $3.9 million in interdepartmental interest income from MGE Power Elm Road and $0.2 million in miscellaneous interest income, partially offset by $1.8 million in interest expense on short-term debt. The interdepartmental interest income is eliminated upon consolidation.


Consolidated Other General Taxes


MGE Energy's and MGE's other general taxes increased $1.0 million or 6.5% in 2008. This increase is primarily attributable to an increase in MGE's license fee tax. The annual license fee tax expense is based on adjusted operating revenues of the prior year.


Consolidated Income Taxes


MGE Energy's effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2008, is 35.5% compared to 36.3% for the same period in 2007. This decrease is primarily attributable to the increased federal wind energy tax credit from the Top of Iowa III wind farm which was placed in service in 2008.




40




MGE's effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2008, is 35.2% compared to 36.2% for the same period in the prior year. The decrease is also primarily attributable to the increased wind energy tax credit.


Noncontrolling Interest, Net of Tax


For the year ended December 31, 2008, MGE Energy (through its wholly owned subsidiary MGE Power) earned $7.6 million and $3.9 million, net of tax, for its interest in MGE Power West Campus and MGE Power Elm Road, respectively. Additionally, MGE Energy earned $0.8 million, net of tax for its interest in MGE Transco. These amounts are recorded as noncontrolling interest expense, net of tax, on MGE's consolidated statement of income.


For the year ended December 31, 2007, MGE Energy (through its wholly owned subsidiary MGE Power) had earned $7.7 million and $2.6 million, net of tax, for its interest in MGE Power West Campus and MGE Power Elm Road, respectively. Additionally, MGE Energy had earned $0.5 million, net of tax, for its interest in MGE Transco. These amounts are recorded as noncontrolling interest expense, net of tax, on MGE's consolidated statement of income.


Liquidity and Capital Resources


Cash Flows


The following summarizes cash flows for MGE Energy and MGE during the twelve months ended 2009, 2008, and 2007:


 

MGE Energy

 

MGE

(In thousands)

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

Cash provided by/(used for):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating activities

$117,909

 

$74,712

 

$76,586

 

$121,264

 

$74,307

 

$78,542

Investing activities

(79,975)

 

(104,282)

 

(134,791)

 

(78,344)

 

(106,849)

 

(134,137)

Financing activities

(37,336)

 

29,887

 

58,991

 

(41,764)

 

32,001

 

56,208


Cash Provided by Operating Activities


MGE Energy


MGE Energy's consolidated net cash provided by operating activities is derived mainly from the electric and gas operations of its principal subsidiary, MGE.


2009 vs. 2008


Cash provided by operating activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, was $117.9 million, an increase of $43.2 million when compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to working capital changes.


Working capital accounts resulted in $12.6 million in cash provided by operating activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, compared to $32.2 million in cash used for operating activities during the same period in the prior year. The increase in cash provided by working capital accounts is primarily attributable to decreased inventory (due to lower natural gas costs), lower accounts receivable (due to lower sales and commodity costs), and reduced collateral postings in the derivative portfolio.


MGE Energy's net income decreased $1.8 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, when compared to the same period in the prior year.


Cash flows related to tax effects increased $9.1 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, primarily due to tax depreciation differences associated with bonus depreciation and the income tax methodology change for accounting of repairs.


Pension contribution resulted in an additional $7.6 million in cash used by operating activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, when compared to the same period in the prior year. These contributions were made to comply with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the Pension Protection Act of 2006, and additional contributions were at management's discretion. See Footnote 13 for further discussion of MGE Energy's Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits.




41




2008 vs. 2007


Cash provided by operating activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, was $74.7 million, a decrease of $1.9 million when compared to the same period in the prior year primarily as a result of changes in working capital.


Working capital accounts resulted in $32.2 million in cash used by operating activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, compared to $9.2 million in cash used by operating activities during the same period in the prior year. Contributing to this change is a higher receivable – margin account balance as a result of additional margin calls associated with MGE Energy's financial and hedging instruments and a higher balance of stored natural gas.


MGE Energy's net income increased $3.9 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, when compared to the same period in the prior year.


Depreciation for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, was $39.3 million compared to $32.2 million in the same period in the prior year. This increase is primarily attributable to higher levels of assets, including the Top of Iowa III wind-powered electric generating facility, which was placed in service in the first quarter of 2008 as well as accelerated depreciation of certain Blount assets. For additional information on the Blount accelerated depreciation, see Footnote 19. Depreciation expense associated with Top of Iowa III and the Blount accelerated depreciation is being recovered in rates.


Deferred taxes increased $7.8 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, primarily due to bonus tax depreciation as a result of the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008.


During the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, MGE Energy received $2.5 million in cash proceeds as a result of a Congestion Cost and Line Loss Allocation Services Agreement. In 2007, MGE, along with several other load serving entities in Wisconsin and Upper Michigan, signed a five year agreement in which the parties agreed to aggregate and equitably allocate specified costs that have not been perfectly allocated by the MISO Day 2 electricity market. Amounts collected in 2007 related to this agreement were returned to customers in 2008.


During the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, MGE Energy made $7.7 million and $6.3 million, respectively, in discretionary contributions to the pension and other postretirement plans.


During the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, MGE Energy's other noncurrent items, net contributed to $6.0 million of operating inflows compared to $1.8 million of operating outflows for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007. Factors contributing to this change include regulatory assets for the conservation costs, debt related costs and Elm Road Units related costs, which are recovered through rates.


MGE


2009 vs. 2008


Cash provided by operating activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, was $121.3 million, an increase of $47.0 million when compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to working capital changes.


Working capital accounts resulted in $17.8 million in cash provided by operating activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, compared to $33.7 million in cash used for operating activities during the same period in the prior year. The increase in cash provided by working capital accounts is primarily attributable to decreased inventory (due to lower natural gas costs), lower accounts receivable (due to lower sales and commodity costs), and reduced collateral postings in the derivative portfolio.


Net income decreased $1.7 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, when compared to the same period in the prior year.


Cash flows related to tax effects increased $8.1 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, primarily due to tax depreciation differences associated with bonus depreciation and the income tax methodology change for accounting of repairs.




42




Pension contribution resulted in an additional $7.6 million in cash used by operating activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, when compared to the same period in the prior year. These contributions were made to comply with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the Pension Protection Act of 2006, and additional contributions were at management's discretion. See Footnote 13 for further discussion of MGE Energy's Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits.


2008 vs. 2007


Cash provided by operating activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, was $74.3 million, a decrease of $4.2 million when compared to the same period in the prior year primarily as a result of changes in working capital.


Working capital accounts resulted in $33.7 million in cash used by operating activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, compared to $7.6 million in cash used by operating activities during the same period in the prior year. Contributing to this change is a higher receivable – margin account balance as a result of additional margin calls associated with MGE's financial and hedging instruments and a higher balance of stored natural gas.


MGE's net income increased $0.5 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, when compared to the same period in the prior year.


Depreciation for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, was $39.3 million compared to $32.2 million in the same period in the prior year. This increase is primarily attributable to higher levels of assets, including the Top of Iowa III wind-powered electric generating facility, which was placed in service in the first quarter of 2008 as well as accelerated depreciation of certain Blount assets. For additional information on the Blount accelerated depreciation, see Footnote 19. Depreciation expense associated with Top of Iowa III and the Blount accelerated depreciation is being recovered in rates.


Deferred taxes increased $7.7 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, primarily due to bonus tax depreciation as a result of the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008.


During the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, MGE received $2.5 million in cash proceeds as a result of a Congestion Cost and Line Loss Allocation Services Agreement. In 2007, MGE, along with several other load serving entities in Wisconsin and Upper Michigan, signed a five year agreement in which the parties agreed to aggregate and equitably allocate specified costs that have not been perfectly allocated by the MISO Day 2 electricity market. Amounts collected in 2007 related to this agreement were returned to customers in 2008.


During the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, MGE made $7.7 million and $6.3 million, respectively in discretionary contributions to the pension and other postretirement plans.


During the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, MGE's other noncurrent items, net contributed to $6.0 million of operating inflows compared to $2.0 million of operating outflows for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007. Factors contributing to this change include regulatory assets for the conservation costs, debt related costs and Elm Road Units related costs.


Capital Requirements and Investing Activities


MGE Energy


2009 vs. 2008


MGE Energy's cash used for investing activities decreased $24.3 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, when compared to the same period in the prior year.


Capital expenditures for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, were $77.9 million. This amount represents a $27.8 million decrease from the expenditures made in the same period in the prior year. This decrease is related to lower construction activity of $22.8 million related to the Elm Road Units and a $7.8 million decrease of capital expenditures due to the completion in February 2008 of the Top of Iowa III wind generation project. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $3.1 million in other utility capital expenditures.


During the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, MGE Energy received cash proceeds from the sale of equity investments of $0.1 million compared to the $3.6 million received for the same period in the prior year.



43




2008 vs. 2007


MGE Energy's cash used for investing activities decreased $30.5 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, when compared to the same period in the prior year.


Capital expenditures for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, were $105.8 million. This amount represents a $30.5 million decrease from the expenditures made in the same period in the prior year. This decrease is related to decreased construction activity for the Top of Iowa III wind generation project of $28.5 million and a decrease of $3.1 million for capital expenditures related to the Elm Road Units. These decreases were partially offset by increased construction activity in other utility capital expenditures of $1.2 million.


During the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, MGE Energy made a cash capital contribution of $3.4 million to ATC. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, MGE Energy did not make any cash capital contributions to ATC. However, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, MGE (through MGE Transco) transferred $1.4 million in certain transmission assets to ATC. In exchange for this transfer, MGE Transco received $0.7 million in cash proceeds and $0.7 million in an additional investment in ATC.


During the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, proceeds from the sale of property were $0.3 million. These proceeds primarily relate to the sale of nonutility property.


During the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, MGE Energy received $3.6 million in cash proceeds from the sale of equity investments compared to $0.9 million received during the twelve months ended December 31, 2007.


MGE


2009 vs. 2008


MGE's cash used for investing activities decreased $28.5 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, when compared to the same period in the prior year.


Capital expenditures for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, were $77.9 million. This amount represents a $27.8 million decrease from the expenditures made in the same period in the prior year. This decrease is related to lower construction activity of $22.8 million related to the Elm Road Units and a $7.8 million decrease of capital expenditures due to the completion in February 2008 of the Top of Iowa III wind generation project. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $3.1 million in other utility capital expenditures.


During the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, MGE did not receive cash proceeds from the sale of equity investments compared to the $1.1 million received for the same period in the prior year.


2008 vs. 2007


MGE's cash used for investing activities decreased $27.3 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, when compared to the same period in the prior year.


Capital expenditures for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, were $105.8 million. This amount represents a $30.5 million decrease from the expenditures made in the same period in the prior year. This decrease is related to decreased construction activity for the Top of Iowa III wind generation project of $28.5 million and a decrease of $3.1 million for capital expenditures related to the Elm Road Units. These decreases were partially offset by increased construction activity for other utility capital expenditures of $1.2 million.


During the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, MGE (through MGE Transco) made a cash capital contribution of $3.4 million to ATC. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, MGE did not make any cash capital contributions to ATC. However, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, MGE (through MGE Transco) transferred $1.4 million in certain transmission assets to ATC. In exchange for this transfer, MGE Transco received $0.7 million in cash proceeds and $0.7 million in an additional investment in ATC.


During the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, proceeds from the sale of property were $0.3 million. These proceeds primarily relate to the sale of nonutility property.




44




Capital expenditures


The following table shows MGE Energy's budgeted capital expenditures for 2010 and actual capital expenditures for both 2009 and 2008:


(In thousands)

For the years ended December 31,


2010

 


2009

 


2008

 

(Budget)

(Actual)

(Actual)

Electric

$46,240

 

$37,014

 

$47,033

Gas

17,560

 

13,734

 

8,441

Utility plant total

63,800

 

50,748

 

55,474

Nonregulated

12,777

 

27,181

 

50,303

MGE Energy total

$76,577

 

$77,929

 

$105,777


MGE Energy intends to fund any remaining capital commitments for the Elm Road Units with funds generated from normal operations, the issuance of long-term debt, and short-term debt. MGE Energy's and MGE's liquidity is primarily affected by their construction requirements. On February 4, 2010, MGE Power Elm Road issued $50 million of its 5.04% senior secured notes due 2040, the proceeds of which were used to repay short-term debt. MGE Energy's major 2009 capital projects include Elm Road. During 2009, $27.2 million in capital expenditures were incurred for the construction of the Elm Road Units. Included in this amount is $3.4 million of interest capitalized.


As of December 31, 2009, MGE Power Elm Road's remaining capital commitments for the Elm Road Units are estimated to be $12.0 million. Based on current forecasts, capital expenditures for this project are expected to be $11.7 million in 2010 and $0.3 million in 2011. These amounts may change as a result of modifications to the project cost estimate or timing differences. See Footnote 21a for additional information.


MGE Energy used funds received as dividend payments from MGE Power West Campus as well as short and long-term external financing to meet its 2009 capital requirements and cash obligations, including dividend payments. External financing included short-term financing under existing lines of credit and proceeds from equity issued under the Stock Plan.


Financing Activities


MGE Energy


2009 vs. 2008


Cash used for MGE Energy's financing activities was $37.3 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, compared to $29.9 million of cash provided by MGE Energy's financing activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008.


MGE Energy received $6.3 million and $31.0 million in cash proceeds as the result of stock issued pursuant to the Stock Plan during the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.


As of June 1, 2009, MGE Energy is purchasing stock in the open market for its Stock Plan rather than issuing new shares. All MGE Energy common stock shares under the Stock Plan are sold pursuant to a registration statement that has been filed with the SEC and is currently effective.


For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, dividends paid were $33.7 million compared to $31.8 million for same period in the prior year. This increase was a result of higher dividend per share ($1.46 vs. $1.43) and an increase in the number of shares outstanding.


For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, net short-term debt repayments were $10.0 million compared to net short-term borrowings of $21.0 million for the same period in the prior year. An additional $50.0 million of short-term debt was reclassified as long-term debt for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009.


In the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, MGE Energy repaid $30.0 million of long-term debt and issued $40.0 million of long-term debt.




45




2008 vs. 2007


Cash provided by MGE Energy's financing activities was $29.9 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, compared to $59.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007. MGE Energy's major capital expenditures (Top of Iowa III wind project and Elm Road Units) were primarily funded with short-term debt, the issuance of common stock and additional long-term debt.


MGE Energy received $31.0 million and $32.8 million in cash proceeds as the result of stock issued during the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.


For the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, dividends paid were $31.8 million compared to $30.3 million for same period in the prior year. This increase was a result of a higher dividend per share ($1.43 vs. $1.41) and an increase in the number of shares outstanding.


MGE Energy repaid $30.0 million of long-term debt in the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, compared to $15.0 million in the twelve months ended December 31, 2007. MGE Energy issued $40.0 million of long-term debt in the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, compared to $25.0 million in the twelve months ended December, 2007.


For the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, net short-term debt borrowings were $21.0 million compared to $46.5 million for the same period in the prior year.


MGE


2009 vs. 2008


During the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, cash used for MGE's financing activities was $41.8 million compared to $32.0 million of cash provided by MGE's financing activities in the same period in the prior year.


For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, net short-term debt repayments were $17.5 million compared to $10.0 million for the same period in the prior year.


Dividends paid from MGE to MGE Energy were $19.3 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009. No cash dividends were paid from MGE to MGE Energy for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008.


Equity contributions received by noncontrolling interest decreased $34.0 million as a result of MGE Power Elm Road requiring less funding for construction of property, plant and equipment. This decrease is slightly offset by $4.2 million of affiliate financing on the Elm Road Units received in the twelve months ended December 31, 2009.


In the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, MGE repaid $30.0 million of long-term debt and issued $40.0 million of long-term debt.


2008 vs. 2007


During the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, cash provided by MGE's financing activities was $32.0 million compared to of $56.2 million in the same period in the prior year.


No cash dividends were paid from MGE to MGE Energy for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, cash dividends made from MGE to MGE Energy were $15.6 million.


MGE repaid $30.0 million of long-term debt in the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, compared to $15.0 million in the twelve months ended December 31, 2007.


MGE issued $40.0 million of long-term debt in the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, compared to $25.0 million in the twelve months ended December 31, 2007.


For the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, net short-term debt repayments were $10.0 million compared to net short-term issuance of $31.5 million for the same period in the prior year.




46




Dividend Restrictions


Dividend payments by MGE to MGE Energy are subject to restrictions arising under a PSCW rate order and, to a lesser degree, MGE's first mortgage bonds. The PSCW order limits the amount of dividends that MGE may pay MGE Energy when its common equity ratio, calculated in the manner used in the rate proceeding, is less than 55%. Under those circumstances, MGE may not pay dividends in excess of $31.4 million and $26.8 million for 2009 and 2008, respectively, plus dividends on shares issued in excess of the shares issued in the rate proceeding forecast if the proceeds are invested in MGE. MGE's thirteen month rolling average common equity ratio at December 31, 2009 and 2008, is estimated to be 57.5% and 50.4%, respectively, as determined under the calculation used in the rate proceeding. MGE was not restricted from paying cash dividends in 2009. Cash dividends paid to MGE Energy were reduced in 2009 and 2008 in order to build additional common stock equity in MGE. In 2009, $19.3 million cash dividends were paid to MGE Energy. MGE paid no cash dividends to MGE Energy in 2008. The rate proceeding calculation includes as indebtedness imputed amounts for MGE's outstanding purchase power capacity payments and other PSCW adjustments, but does not include the indebtedness associated with MGE Power West Campus, which is consolidated into MGE's financial statements and will not include the indebtedness associated with MGE Power Elm Road, which will be consolidated into MGE's financial statements.


MGE has covenanted with the holders of its first mortgage bonds not to declare or pay any dividend or make any other distribution on or purchase any shares of its common stock unless, after giving effect thereto, the aggregate amount of all such dividends and distributions and all amounts applied to such purchases, after December 31, 1945, shall not exceed the earned surplus (retained earnings) accumulated subsequent to December 31, 1945. As of December 31, 2009, approximately $229.0 million was available for the payment of dividends under this covenant.


Credit Facilities


At December 31, 2009, MGE Energy and MGE had the following aggregate bank commitments and available capacity under the credit agreements and the indicated amounts of outstanding commercial paper:



Borrower

Aggregate Bank Commitments

Outstanding Commercial Paper

Outstanding Borrowings

Available Capacity


Expiration Date

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

MGE Energy

$80.0

$ --

$80.0

$ --

December 21, 2010

 

$40.0

$ --

$1.0

$39.0

August 27, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

MGE

$55.0

$33.5

$ --

$21.5

December 21, 2010

 

$20.0

$ --

$ --

$20.0

March 30, 2010


Borrowings under each credit agreement may bear interest at a rate that floats daily based upon a prime rate or at a rate fixed for a specified interest period based upon a LIBOR-based index, plus an adder. In the case of the LIBOR-based rates, the adder is based upon the senior unsecured credit rating for MGE and does not exceed 0.075% for the agreements expiring in December 2010, the adder is a flat 1% for the agreement expiring in March 2010, and the adder is a flat 1.5% for the agreement expiring in August 2010. For the agreements expiring in March 2010 and August 2010, the daily floating rate is, in effect, subject to a floor of a LIBOR-based rate plus 1%.


Our current credit agreements expire during 2010. We do not expect any difficulties in renewing or replacing these lines of credit. MGE Energy's lines of credit have been used to help finance the Elm Road Units. Since a majority of Elm Road has been financed, the levels of credit needed in 2010 are expected to be lower. However, we expect that the borrowing costs will be higher under the replacement facilities than under the lines that expire in December 2010.


The agreements require the borrower to maintain a ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated total capitalization not to exceed a maximum of 65%. The ratio calculation excludes assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses included in MGE's financial statements as a result of the consolidation of VIEs, such as MGE Power West Campus and MGE Power Elm Road. At December 31, 2009, the ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated total capitalization for each of MGE Energy and MGE were 43.5% and 39.6%, respectively. See Footnote 10, for additional information regarding the credit facilities.




47




Capitalization Ratios


MGE Energy's capitalization ratios were as follows:


 

MGE Energy

 

2009

 

2008

Common shareholders' equity

56.4%

 

54.7%

Long-term debt*

36.3%

 

31.1%

Short-term debt

7.3%

 

14.2%

*Includes the current portion of long-term debt.


Credit Ratings


The following table shows MGE's current credit ratings. The ratings presented reflect the current views of these rating agencies and are subject to change. MGE Energy is not rated because it has not issued any debt securities.


 

Standard & Poor's

 

Moody's

First Mortgage Bonds

AA-

 

Aa2

Unsecured debt

AA-

 

Aa3

Commercial paper

A1+

 

P1


On November 12, 2009, Standard and Poor's reaffirmed MGE's corporate credit rating of AA- and indicated that the rating outlook was stable. In its release, S&P noted that MGE's creditworthiness reflects an excellent business risk profile and an intermediate financial profile that will remain under pressure over the next couple of years due to a heavy capital spending cycle, including construction expenditures and expenditures on environmental initiatives associated with its joint ownership interest in the Columbia coal-fired generating station.


On December 18, 2009, Moody's announced that it had placed MGE's unsecured credit rating (Aa3) under review for possible downgrade. Moody's release indicated that the review will assess the specifics of MGE's recent rate case, its implications for MGE's future performance, and future capital spending requirements. Moody's stated its belief that the outcome of the rating review is likely to be limited to no more than a one notch change in MGE's senior unsecured ratings. Moody's expects the secured rating to remain unchanged at Aa2.


A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold securities and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency. MGE's access to the capital markets, including the commercial paper market, and its financing costs in those markets are dependent on its securities' ratings. None of MGE's borrowing is subject to default or prepayment due to downgrading of securities' ratings, although such a down grading could increase fees and interest charges under MGE Energy's and MGE's credit facilities.


Capital and Credit Markets


The uncertainty in the capital and credit markets has adversely affected the United States and global economies during the past year. These events have the potential to create additional risks for businesses, including MGE Energy and MGE, during 2010. MGE Energy and MGE have performed additional analyses to determine the potential impact, if any, of recent market conditions on its financial statements. These analyses and assessments include counterparty creditworthiness, value of our investments, access to liquidity in the capital and credit markets, and exposure to operational risk.


Operational

MGE Energy's and MGE's operations are affected by local, national and worldwide economic conditions. The consequences of a prolonged recession may include a lower level of economic activity, uncertainty regarding energy prices and the capital and commodity markets, and increased credit risk. A lower level of economic activity might result in a decline in energy consumption, which may adversely affect our revenues and future growth. Increased credit risk reflects the risk that our retail customers will not pay their bills in a timely manner or at all, which may lead to a reduction in liquidity and an eventual increase in bad debt expense. 




48




Liquidity

The capital markets have recovered from last year's instability and access to capital is not as much of an issue as it was a year ago. MGE Energy and MGE continue to maintain adequate liquidity for its short term needs. MGE Energy's and MGE's liquidity position improved due to the lower natural gas costs. In February 2010, MGE Energy issued $50 million in long term debt and may issue additional long term debt for Elm Road Unit 2 later in 2010. The proceeds from the additional long term debt will be used to pay down MGE Energy's line of credit.


Counterparty creditworthiness

Credit risk also includes the risk that trading counterparties that owe us money or product will breach their obligations. MGE's risk management policy is to limit transactions to a group of high quality counterparties. Should the counterparties to these arrangements fail to perform, we may be forced to enter into alternative arrangements. In that event, our financial results could be adversely affected and we could incur losses.


Pension

MGE sponsors defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefits plans for our employees. The oversight on the investments held in the plans is substantial, and we followed established investment policies and practices. Substantial changes in the value of trust fund assets may affect the level of required contributions to these trusts to meet benefit obligations.


Insurance

MGE Energy has reviewed its exposure to insurance risk and has concluded that there are no material changes related to the cost or availability of liability, property and other forms of insurance. Management continues to monitor closely events and the ratings for insurance companies associated with insurance programs.


Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments for MGE Energy and MGE


MGE Energy's and MGE's contractual obligations as of December 31, 2009, representing cash obligations that are considered to be firm commitments, are as follows:


(In thousands)

 

 

Payment due within:

 

Due after

5 Years

 

Total

 

1 Year

 

2-3 Years

 

4-5 Years

 

MGE Energy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt (a)

$323,500

 

$1,528


$37,634 (k)


$ 5,116

 

$ 279,222

Short-term debt (b)

64,500

 

64,500


-


-

 

-

Interest expense (c)

287,973

 

18,148


36,467


34,402

 

198,956

Operating leases (d)

18,795

 

2,339


3,785


2,562

 

10,109

Purchase obligations (e)

608,248

 

98,284


100,870


93,415

 

315,679

Other obligations (f)

6,691

 

2,300


1,470


854

 

2,067

Purchase obligations - Elm Road (g)

12,011

 

11,689


322


-

 

-

Purchase obligations - Environmental (i)

8,526

 

530


666


666

 

6,664

Total MGE Energy contractual obligations

$1,330,244

 

$199,318


$181,214


$137,015

 

$812,697

 


 






 


MGE


 






 


Long-term debt (h)

$273,500

 

$-


$34,300 (k)


$1,782

 

$237,418

Short-term debt (j)

33,500

 

33,500


-


-

 

-

Interest expense (c)

250,066

 

15,870


31,741


30,012

 

172,443

Operating leases (d)

18,795

 

2,339


3,785


2,562

 

10,109

Purchase obligations (e)

608,248

 

98,284


100,870


93,415

 

315,679

Other obligations (f)

5,846

 

1,455


1,470


854

 

2,067

Purchase obligations - Elm Road (g)

12,011

 

11,689


322


-

 

-

Purchase obligations - Environmental (i)

8,526

 

530


666


666

 

6,664

Total MGE contractual obligations

$1,210,492

 

$163,667


$173,154


$129,291

 

$744,380


For additional information about:


(a) Long-term debt consisting of secured first mortgage bonds, unsecured medium-term notes, Industrial Development Revenue Bonds issued by MGE, and private placement debt issued by MGE and MGE Power West Campus. Also included are the $50 million of MGE Power Elm Road notes issued on February 4, 2010, the proceeds of which were used to repay short-term debt. See Footnote 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


(b) Short-term debt consisting of commercial paper for MGE and borrowings under MGE Energy lines of credit, see Footnote 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



49




(c) Amount represents interest expense on long-term facilities. See Footnote 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the long term debt outstanding at December 31, 2009.


(d) Operating leases. See Footnote 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


(e) Purchase obligations for MGE consist primarily of the purchase of electricity and natural gas, electric transmission, natural gas storage capacity, natural gas pipeline transportation, and the purchase and transport of coal. See Footnote 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion.


(f) Other obligations are primarily related to investment commitments, easements, maintenance and service agreements, and fuel credits.


(g) Purchase obligations for MGE Energy and MGE related to contracts for equipment and services related to the construction of Elm Road. See Footnotes 18 and 21 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


(h) Long-term debt consisting of secured first mortgage bonds, unsecured medium-term notes, Industrial Development Revenue Bonds issued by MGE, and private placement debt issued by MGE and MGE Power West Campus. See Footnote 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


(i) Contractual commitments for certain services and capital at the jointly owned Columbia plant that will be acquired to ensure compliance with certain environmental initiatives. Also included is a commitment related to greenhouse gas reduction efforts as a result of a settlement agreement with Clean Wisconsin, Inc. and Sierra Club over the Elm Road Units WPDES permit.


(j) Short-term debt consisting of commercial paper. See Footnote 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


(k) On April 1, 2012, MGE's $19.3 million, 4.875%, Series B, Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, have a mandatory repurchase date. The actual maturity date for these IRB's is October 1, 2027.


The above amounts do not include any contributions for MGE's pension and postretirement plans. Contributions to the plans for 2010 through 2014 are expected to be between $11.0 million to $13.0 million each year. The contributions for years after 2014 are currently not yet estimated. MGE has adopted the asset smoothing as permitted in accordance with the Pension Protection Act of 2006, including modifications made by WRERA. Due to uncertainties in the future economic performance of plan assets, discount rates, and other key assumptions, estimated contributions are subject to change. MGE may also elect to make additional discretionary contributions.


The above amounts, also, do not include future voluntary capital calls to ATC. On January 29, 2010, MGE Transco made a voluntary $0.5 million capital contribution to ATC. The amount and timing of future voluntary capital calls is uncertain and primarily dependent on the operations and expansion of ATC.


MGE Energy's and MGE's commercial commitments as of December 31, 2009, representing commitments triggered by future events and including financing arrangements to secure obligations of MGE Energy and MGE, and guarantees by MGE, are as follows:


 

 

 

Expiration within:

 

Due after

5 Years

(In thousands)

Total

 

1 Year

 

2-3 Years

 

4-5 Years

 

MGE Energy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available lines of credit (a)

$195,000

 

$195,000

 

$-

 

$-

 

$-

Guarantees (b)

3,712

 

915

 

1,017

 

691

 

1,089

 


 


 


 


 


MGE


 


 


 


 


Available lines of credit (c)

$ 75,000

 

$75,000

 

$-

 

$-

 

$-

Guarantees (b)

3,712

 

915

 

1,017

 

691

 

1,089


For additional information about:


(a) Amount includes those facilities discussed in (c) plus two additional line of credits. MGE Energy has available at any time an $80.0 million committed revolving credit agreement, expiring in December 2010, and a $40.0 million revolving credit facility, expiring at August 27, 2010. At December 31, 2009, MGE Energy had borrowed $81.0 million under these credit facilities. Accordingly, MGE Energy's available credit under these credit facilities was $39.0 million at December 31, 2009.



50




(b) MGE has guaranteed repayment of certain receivables it sold to a financial institution under a chattel paper agreement. See Footnote 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


(c) Amounts include a $55.0 million committed revolving credit agreement expiring in December 2010, and an additional $20.0 million line of credit that matures on March 30, 2010. Each credit facility is used to support commercial paper issuances. At December 31, 2009, there were no borrowings under either credit facility. At December 31, 2009, there was $33.5 million of commercial paper outstanding.


Blount Station


On January 19, 2006, MGE announced a plan, subject to certain conditions, that includes discontinuing coal use by the end of 2011 at Blount. The plant will continue to run on natural gas but will be reduced from its current approximate 190 MW capacity to 100 MW when coal burning is discontinued. MGE determined that certain employee positions will be eliminated as a result of this exit plan.


In March 2009, MGE received notification from MISO that in order to meet national electric system reliability standards, MGE will need to keep Blount available at full capacity until MISO declares that the 90 MW are no longer needed for system reliability. To comply with the MISO directive, MGE will delay plans for retiring 90 MW of generation equipment at Blount. The transition from burning coal to burning only natural gas will still occur by the end of 2011. After 2011, the entire plant will be operated exclusively on natural gas. MGE is working with MISO to develop a detailed agreement for this continued operation, which among other things will include a mechanism for cost recovery. MGE management also began working on an implementation plan.


MGE has entered into agreements providing severance benefits to employees affected by the exit plan. In May 2009, renegotiated union agreements were ratified and resulted in changes to the involuntary and voluntary severance benefits. Estimated benefits expected to be paid are as follows: $0.1 million in 2010, $0.8 million in 2011, and $0.3 million in 2013.


MGE will recover in rates the costs associated with the discontinuance of coal at Blount. As such, the severance charges for these employees have been deferred and recognized on the consolidated balance sheet of MGE Energy and MGE as a regulatory asset.


In January 2010, MGE announced it will change its primary fuel at Blount from coal to natural gas. Coal will become the secondary fuel at Blount. This switch to natural gas as a primary fuel will occur in March 2010. As a result of this change, certain employee positions will be eliminated and severance benefits will be paid in 2010 totaling $0.4 million. These severance benefits were accelerated into 2010 from 2011, but are expected to be offset by lower payroll charges in 2010.


Critical Accounting Policies - MGE Energy and MGE


The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to unbilled revenues, pension obligations, income taxes, derivatives, and regulatory assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.


Unbilled Revenues


Revenues from the sale of electricity and gas to customers are recorded when electricity/gas is delivered to those customers. The quantity of those sales is measured by customers' meters. Due to the large volume of those meters, it is impractical to read all of them at month end. Meters are read on a systematic basis throughout the month based on established meter-reading schedules. Consequently, at the end of any month, there exists a quantity of electricity and gas that has been delivered to customers but has not been captured by the meter readings. As a result, management must estimate revenue related to electricity and gas delivered to customers between their meter-read dates and the end of the period. These estimates include:



51





·

The amount of electricity expected to be lost in the process of its transmission and distribution to customers (line loss) and the amount of electricity actually delivered to customers.


·

The amount of gas expected to be lost in the process of its distribution to customers and the amount of gas actually delivered to customers.


·

The mix of sales between customer rate classes, which is based upon historical utilization assumptions.


MGE monitors the reasonableness of the unbilled revenue estimate through the review of ratios such as unbilled electric consumption compared to billed electric sales. In the case of unbilled gas, the estimated unbilled consumption is compared to various other statistics, including percent of gas available for sale, change in unbilled month to month and change in unbilled compared to the prior year in order to confirm its reasonableness.


Allowance for Doubtful Accounts


MGE maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. It determines the allowance based on historical write-off experience, regional economic data, and review of the accounts receivable aging. MGE reviews its allowance for doubtful accounts monthly. Although management believes that the allowance for doubtful accounts is MGE's best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses, if the financial condition of MGE's customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.


Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans


MGE provides employees with certain retirement (pension) and postretirement (health care and life insurance) benefits. In order to measure the expense and obligations associated with these benefits, management must make a variety of estimates, including discount rates used to value certain liabilities, the expected return on plan assets set aside to fund these costs, the rate of compensation increase, employee turnover rates, retirement rates, health care trends, mortality rates, and other factors. These accounting estimates bear the risk of change due to the uncertainty attached to the estimate as well as the fact that these estimates are difficult to measure. Different estimates used by us could result in recognizing different amounts of expense over different periods of time.


We use third-party specialists to assist us in evaluating our assumptions as well as appropriately measure the costs and obligations associated with these retirement benefits. The discount rate and expected return on plan assets are based primarily on investment yields available and the historical performance of our plan assets. They are critical accounting estimates because they are subject to management's judgment and can materially affect net income.


·

Assumed return on assets. This assumption represents the rate of return on plan assets reflecting the average rate of earnings expected on the funds invested (or to be invested) to provide for the benefits included in the projected benefit obligation. For 2009, MGE used an assumed return on assets of 8.5% for pension and 7.39% for other postretirement benefits. The 8.5% annual expected rate of return is based on projected long-term equity and bond returns, maturities and asset allocations. Holding other assumptions constant, for every 1% reduction in the expected rate of return on plan assets, annual pension and other postretirement cost would increase by approximately $1.1 million, before taxes.


·

Discount rate. The discount rate represents the rate at which pension obligations could effectively be settled on a present-value basis. MGE uses high-grade bond yields as a benchmark for determining the appropriate discount rate.


·

Medical trend assumptions. The health care cost trend rate is the assumed rate of increase in per-capita health care charges.


See Footnote 13 for additional discussion of these plans.


Income Tax Provision


MGE Energy's and MGE's income tax provisions, including both current and deferred components, are based on estimates, assumptions, calculations, and interpretation of tax statutes for the current and future years. Determination of current-year federal and state income tax will not be settled for years.



52




Management regularly makes assessments of tax return outcomes relative to financial statement tax provisions and adjusts the tax provisions in the period when facts become final.


Additionally, in determining our current income tax provision we assess temporary differences resulting from differing treatments of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are recorded in our balance sheets. When we maintain deferred tax assets, we assess the likelihood that these assets will be recovered through adjustments to future taxable income. To the extent we believe recovery is not more likely than not, we establish a valuation allowance. We record an allowance reducing the asset to a value we believe will be recoverable based on our expectation of future taxable income. We believe the accounting estimate related to the valuation allowance is a critical accounting estimate because it is highly susceptible to change from period to period as it requires management to make assumptions about our future income over the lives of the deferred tax assets, and the impact of increasing or decreasing the valuation allowance is potentially material to our results of operations.


Accounting for uncertainty in income taxes applies to all tax positions and requires a recognition threshold and measurement standard for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken, or expected to be taken, in an income tax return. The threshold is defined for recognizing tax return positions in the financial statements as "more likely than not" that the position is sustainable, based on its merits. Subsequent recognition, derecognition, and measurement is based on management's best judgment given the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date.


Accounting for Derivative Instruments


MGE accounts for derivative financial instruments, except those qualifying for the normal purchase normal sale exception, at their fair value on the balance sheet. Fair value is determined using current quoted market prices, except for the ten-year PPA which is valued utilizing an internally-developed pricing model. This model includes observable and unobservable inputs.


MGE received approval from the PSCW to establish a regulatory asset or liability for the deferral of the effects of mark-to-market accounting on contracts related to MGE's regulated operations.


Regulatory Assets/Liabilities


Regulatory assets represent costs that have been deferred to future periods when it is probable that the regulator will allow future recovery of those costs through rates. MGE bases its assessment of recovery on precedents established by the regulatory body. Regulatory liabilities represent previous collections from customers that are expected to be refunded to customers in future periods. Regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities typically include deferral of energy costs, the normalization of income taxes, the deferral of certain operating expenses, and non-ARO removal cost. The accounting for these regulatory assets and liabilities is in accordance with regulatory accounting standards.


MGE continually assesses whether the regulatory assets and liabilities meet the criteria for probability of future recovery. This assessment considers factors such as changes in the regulatory environment, recent rate orders to other regulated entities under the same jurisdiction, and the status of any pending or potential deregulation legislation. If future recovery of costs becomes no longer probable, the assets and liabilities would be recognized as current-period revenues or expenses.


Amortization of regulatory assets and liabilities is provided over the recovery period as allowed in the related regulatory agreement.


Asset Retirement Obligation


The ability to reasonably estimate an Asset Retirement Obligation (ARO) is a matter of management judgment, based upon management's ability to estimate a settlement date or range of settlement dates and a method or potential method of settlement of its AROs. In determining whether our AROs could be reasonably estimated, management considers past practices, industry practices, management's intent, and the estimated economic life of the assets. The fair value of the AROs is then estimated using an expected present value technique. Changes in management's assumptions regarding settlement dates, settlement methods, or assigned probabilities could have a material effect on the liability recorded at December 31, 2009, as well as the regulatory asset recorded. The liabilities associated with AROs will be adjusted on an ongoing basis due to the passage of time and revisions to either the timing or the amount of the original estimates of undiscounted cash flows. These adjustments could have a significant impact on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Footnote 20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding AROs.



53




Inflation


The current financial statements report operating results in terms of historical cost, but they do not evaluate the impact of inflation. Because utilities can depreciate only the original cost of utility plant, there may not be adequate cash flows from existing plant to replace this investment. Under PSCW rate treatment, projected operating costs, including the impacts of inflation, are recovered in revenues.


Adoption of Accounting Principles and Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements - MGE Energy and MGE


See footnote 22 for discussion of new accounting pronouncements.


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


MGE Energy and MGE are potentially exposed to market risk associated with interest rates, commodity prices, weather, and equity returns. MGE currently has no exposure to foreign currency risk. MGE manages some risk exposure through risk management policies and the use of derivative instruments. MGE's risk management policy prohibits speculative trading transactions.


Weather Risk


MGE's sales forecasts, used to establish rates, are set by the PSCW based upon estimated temperatures, which approximate 20-year historical averages. MGE's electric revenues are sensitive to the summer cooling season and, to some extent, to the winter heating season. A significant portion of MGE's gas system demand is driven by heating. MGE's gas revenues are collected under a combination of fixed and volumetric rates set by the PSCW based on "normal weather." As a result of weather-sensitive demand and volumetric rates, a portion of MGE's gas revenue is at risk for warmer-than-normal weather. MGE may use weather derivatives, pursuant to its risk management program, to reduce the impact of weather volatility on its gas revenues.


MGE may also be impacted by extreme weather conditions. Such conditions may restrict the operation of, or may damage, operating assets or may negatively impact the price of commodity and other costs.


A summary of actual weather information in the utility segment's service territory during 2009, 2008, and 2007, as measured by degree days, may be found in Results of Operations in this report.


Commodity Price Risk


MGE has commodity price risk exposure with respect to the price of natural gas, electricity, coal, emission credits, and oil. MGE employs established policies and procedures to reduce the market risks associated with changing commodity prices. MGE's commodity risks are somewhat mitigated by the current ratemaking process in place for recovering electric fuel cost, purchased energy costs, and the cost of natural gas. MGE's electric fuel costs are subject to fuel rules established by the PSCW.


MGE's electric operations burn natural gas in several of its peaking power plants or as a supplemental fuel at several coal-fired plants and, in many cases, the cost of purchased power is tied to the cost of natural gas. MGE bears significant regulatory risk for the recovery of such fuel and purchased power costs when they are higher than the base rate established in its current rate structure.


Under the electric fuel rules, MGE would be required to make a refund to customers if the fuel rules costs fall outside the lower end of the range and would be allowed to request a surcharge if the fuel rules costs exceeded the upper end of the range. The range is defined by the PSCW and has been modified throughout the years based on market conditions and other relevant factors. Currently, MGE is subject to a plus or minus 2% range. MGE assumes the risks and benefits of variances that are within the 2% bandwidth. For 2009, fuel and purchased power costs included in MGE's base fuel rates are $123.2 million. See Footnote 17 for additional information. MGE's gas segment is governed by the purchased gas adjustment clause (PGA). Under the PGA, MGE is able to pass through to customers the cost of gas, subject to certain limited incentives.


MGE also reduces price risk caused by market fluctuations via physical contracts and financial derivative contracts, including futures, swaps, options, forwards, and other contractual commitments. The maximum length of time over which cash flows related to energy commodities can be hedged is two years.




54




MGE has financial gas and electric commodity contracts to hedge commodity price risk in the gas and electric segments. These contracts are primarily comprised of exchange-traded option and future contracts. MGE also holds FTRs which are used to hedge the risk of increased congestion charges. At December 31, 2009, the fair value of the FTR instruments exceeded the cost basis by $0.3 million. Under the PGA clause and electric fuel rules, MGE may include in the costs of fuel (natural gas or power) the costs and benefits of the aforementioned fuel price risk management tools. Because these costs/benefits are recoverable, the related unrealized loss/gain has been deferred on the balance sheet as a regulatory asset/liability.


MGE has also entered into futures and basis swaps to take advantage of physical and financial arbitrage opportunities between supply basins and pricing spreads between future months' gas supply. Until thresholds have been achieved, ratepayers receive 100% of the benefits or loss from these deals. If certain thresholds are achieved, MGE shareholders have the ability to receive 40% of the benefits or loss from these deals whereas ratepayers have the ability to receive 60% of the benefits or loss from these deals. At December 31, 2009, the cost basis of these instruments exceeded their fair value by less than $0.1 million.


MGE has also entered into a ten-year purchased power agreement which provides MGE with firm capacity and energy beginning June 1, 2012, and ending on May 31, 2022 (the "base term"). The agreement also allows MGE the option to purchase power during a period of time preceding the base term as well as an option to extend the contract after the base term. The agreement is a derivative contract and is recognized at its fair value on the balance sheet. The fair value of the contract at December 31, 2009, reflects a loss position of $12.8 million.


MGE's energy contracts are valued using readily available NYMEX pricing data.


Interest Rate Risk


Both MGE Energy and MGE have short term borrowings at varying interest rates. MGE issues commercial paper for its short-term borrowings, while MGE Energy draws from its current credit facility to meet its short-term borrowing needs (see Footnote 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). Borrowing levels vary from period to period depending upon capital investments and other factors. Future short-term interest expense and payments will reflect both future short-term interest rates and borrowing levels. MGE Energy and MGE manage interest rate risk by limiting their variable rate exposure and continually monitoring the effects of market changes on interest rates. MGE is not exposed to changes in interest rates on a substantial portion of its long-term debt until that debt matures and is refinanced at market rates. Assuming the current level of variable rate borrowings and assuming a 1% change in the 2009 average interest rate under these borrowings, it is estimated that our 2009 interest expense and net income would have changed by $1.1 million for MGE Energy and $0.3 million for MGE.


Equity Price Risk - Pension-Related Assets


MGE currently funds its liabilities related to employee benefits through trust funds. These funds, which include investments in debt and equity securities, are managed by various investment managers. Changes in market value of these investments can have an impact on the future expenses related to these liabilities. Holding other assumptions constant, for every 1% reduction in the expected rate of return on plan assets, annual pension and other postretirement cost would increase by approximately $1.1 million, before taxes. MGE's risk of expense and annuity payments, as a result of changes in the market value of the trust funds, is mitigated in part through future rate actions by the PSCW. The value of employee benefit plans trusts' assets have increased in value by approximately 23.9% during the twelve months ended December 31, 2009. During the twelve months ending December 31, 2008, the value of our employee benefit plans trusts' assets, declined in value by approximately 27.5%.


Regulatory Recovery Risk


MGE's electric operations burn natural gas in several of its peak power plants or as a supplemental fuel at several coal-fired plants and, in many cases, the cost of purchased power is tied to the cost of natural gas. MGE bears significant regulatory risk for the recovery of such fuel and purchased power costs when costs are higher than the base rate established in its current rate structure.




55




As noted above in Commodity Price Risk, the electric operations of MGE operate under a "fuel rules" adjustment clause for fuel and purchased power costs associated with the generation and delivery of electricity. This clause establishes a base rate for fuel and purchased power. MGE is subject to a fuel rules bandwidth of -2% to +2%. MGE may be required to refund to customers if the fuel rules costs fall outside the lower end of the range (-2%), and would be allowed to request a surcharge if the fuel rules costs exceeded the upper end of the range (+2%). MGE assumes the risks and benefits of variances that are within the 2% bandwidth. For 2010, fuel and purchased power costs included in MGE's base fuel rates are $102.0 million.


Credit Risk - Counterparty


Credit risk is the loss that may result from counterparty nonperformance. MGE is exposed to credit risk primarily through its merchant energy business. MGE uses credit policies to manage its credit risk, which includes utilizing an established credit approval process, monitoring counterparty limits, employing credit mitigation measures such as collateral or prepayment arrangements, and using netting agreements.


Due to the possibility of extreme volatility in the prices of energy commodities and derivatives, the market value of contractual positions with individual counterparties could exceed established credit limits or collateral provided by those counterparties. If such a counterparty were then to fail to perform its obligations under its contract (for example, fail to deliver the electricity MGE originally contracted for), MGE could sustain a loss that could have a material impact on its financial results.


Additionally, if a counterparty were to default and MGE were to liquidate all contracts with that entity, MGE's credit loss would include the loss in value of mark-to-market contracts; the amount owed for settled transactions; and additional payments, if any, to settle unrealized losses on accrual contracts. As of December 31, 2009, no counterparties have defaulted.


MGE is obligated to provide service to all electric and gas customers within its respective franchised territories. MGE's franchised electric territory includes a 316 square-mile area in Dane County, Wisconsin, and MGE's franchised gas territory includes a service area covering 1,631 square miles in Wisconsin. Based on results for the year ended December 31, 2009, no one customer constituted more than 9% of total operating revenues for MGE Energy and MGE. Credit risk for electric and gas is managed by MGE's credit and collection policies, which are consistent with state regulatory requirements.


Cash, cash equivalents, and customer accounts receivable are the financial instruments that potentially subject MGE Energy and MGE to concentrations of credit risk. MGE Energy and MGE place their cash and cash equivalents with high credit-quality financial institutions. MGE has limited concentrations of credit risk from customer accounts receivable because of the large number of customers and relatively strong economy in its service territory.




56




Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.


MGE Energy


Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15f. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our assessment under the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2009.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


The effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.


February 25, 2010


MGE


Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15f. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our assessment under the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2009.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


February 25, 2010




57




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of MGE Energy, Inc.:


In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MGE Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedules listed in the accompanying index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.


A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

February 25, 2010




58




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of Madison Gas and Electric Company:


In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Madison Gas and Electric Company and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

February 25, 2010




59




MGE Energy, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Income

(In thousands, except per-share amounts)


 

For the years ended December 31,

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

Operating Revenues:


 


 


Regulated revenues

$524,658

 

$588,560

 

$532,413

Nonregulated revenues

9,161

 

7,433

 

5,181

Total Operating Revenues

533,819

 

595,993

 

537,594

 


 


 


Operating Expenses:


 


 


Fuel for electric generation

36,879

 

54,748

 

56,694

Purchased power

85,098

 

74,676

 

77,594

Cost of gas sold

123,062

 

171,545

 

140,838

Other operations and maintenance

145,177

 

151,176

 

130,831

Depreciation and amortization

41,080

 

39,273

 

32,199

Other general taxes

17,858

 

16,793

 

15,771

Total Operating Expenses

449,154

 

508,211

 

453,927

Operating Income

84,665

 

87,782

 

83,667

 


 


 


Other income, net

8,096

 

8,044

 

6,069

Interest expense, net

(13,594)

 

(14,002)

 

(13,056)

Income before income taxes

79,167

 

81,824

 

76,680

Income tax provision

(28,170)

 

(29,056)

 

(27,855)

Net Income

$ 50,997

 

$ 52,768

 

$48,825

 


 


 


Earnings Per Share of Common Stock

(basic and diluted):

$ 2.21

 

$ 2.38

 

$2.27

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends per share of common stock

$1.46

 

$1.43

 

$1.41

 


 


 


Average Shares Outstanding

(basic and diluted)

23,070

 

22,197

 

21,520


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the above consolidated financial statements.



60




MGE Energy, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)


 

For the years ended December 31,

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

Operating Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

$50,997

 

$52,768

 

$48,825

Items not affecting cash:


 


 


Depreciation and amortization

41,080

 

39,273

 

32,199

Deferred income taxes

17,710

 

8,583

 

750

Provision for doubtful receivables

3,409

 

4,273

 

3,080

AFUDC-equity funds

(473)

 

(858)

 

(1,927)

Employee benefit plan expenses

7,167

 

7,891

 

8,101

Equity earnings in ATC

(8,173)

 

(7,241)

 

(6,047)

Gain on sale of investments

(115)

 

(3,113)

 

(778)

Other items

2,105

 

1,562

 

2,083

Changes in working capital items:


 


 


Receivable – margin account

11,256

 

(12,478)

 

694

Trade and other receivables, net

11,188

 

(6,912)

 

(12,499)

Inventories

9,972

 

(12,538)

 

4,099

Unbilled revenues

5,522

 

(4,331)

 

(4,332)

Prepaid Taxes

(14,365)

 

(975)

 

(948)

Other current assets

2,407

 

(1,968)

 

674

Accounts payable

(9,037)

 

1,202

 

3,608

Reserve for fuel refund

269

 

5,506

 

-

Other current liabilities

(4,573)

 

308

 

(457)

Proceeds from Congestion Cost and Line Loss

Allocation Agreement

-

 

-

 

2,545

Dividend income from ATC

6,285

 

5,272

 

4,441

Cash contributions to pension and other postretirement plans

(15,278)

 

(7,665)

 

(6,346)

Other noncurrent items, net

556

 

6,153

 

(1,179)

Cash Provided by Operating Activities

117,909

 

74,712

 

76,586

Investing Activities:


 


 


Capital expenditures

(77,929)

 

(105,777)

 

(136,258)

Capital contributions to ATC and other investments

(3,701)

 

(3,678)

 

(255)

Repayment (Advance) to WEPCO for ATC Elm Road Work

3,300

 

(330)

 

(138)

Proceeds from sale of investments

114

 

3,612

 

910

Other

(1,759)

 

1,891

 

950

Cash Used for Investing Activities

(79,975)

 

(104,282)

 

(134,791)

Financing Activities:


 


 


Issuance of common stock, net

6,275

 

30,997

 

32,786

Cash dividends paid on common stock

(33,693)

 

(31,780)

 

(30,295)

Repayment of long-term debt

-

 

(30,000)

 

(15,000)

Issuance of long-term debt

-

 

40,000

 

25,000

Increase in long-term debt used to repay short-term debt

50,000

 

-

 

-

Increase (decrease) in short-term debt

(60,000)

 

21,000

 

46,500

Other

82

 

(330)

 

-

Cash Provided by (Used for) Financing Activities

(37,336)

 

29,887

 

58,991

Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents:

598

 

317

 

786

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

4,106

 

3,789

 

3,003

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

4,704

 

$4,106

 

$3,789

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:


 


 


Interest paid

$16,577

 

$18,709

 

$13,736

Income taxes paid

$24,172

 

$21,129

 

$27,902

Income taxes received

$(1)

 

$(185)

 

$(333)


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the above consolidated financial statements.



61




MGE Energy, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands)


 

At December 31,

ASSETS

2009

 

2008

Current Assets:

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$4,704

 

$4,106

Receivable – margin account

3,495

 

4,805

Accounts receivable, less reserves of $3,701 and $4,076, respectively

35,309

 

45,266

Other accounts receivable, less reserves of $541 and $200, respectively

3,041

 

7,659

Unbilled revenues

29,179

 

34,701

Materials and supplies, at average cost

15,931

 

15,592

Fossil fuel

7,870

 

3,228

Stored natural gas, at average cost

27,193

 

42,146

Prepaid taxes

30,036

 

15,671

Regulatory assets - current

-

 

9,876

Other current assets

8,323

 

10,828

Total Current Assets

165,081

 

193,878

Other long-term receivables

2,928

 

3,005

Special billing projects

821

 

464

Regulatory assets

113,375

 

116,165

Other deferred assets and other

6,461

 

5,620

 


 


Property, Plant, and Equipment:


 


Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net

719,797

 

702,549

Construction work in progress

219,967

 

198,694

Total Property, Plant, and Equipment

939,764

 

901,243

 


 


Investments

53,455

 

47,900

 


 


Total Assets

$1,281,885

 

$1,268,275

 


 


LIABILITIES AND CAPITALIZATION


 


Current Liabilities:


 


Long-term debt due within one year

$1,528

 

$-

Short-term debt

64,500

 

124,500

Accounts payable

35,839

 

47,229

Accrued interest and taxes

4,028

 

4,070

Deferred income taxes

2

 

3,306

Regulatory liabilities - current

551

 

5,974

Pension liability - current

798

 

813

Other current liabilities

19,892

 

19,349

Total Current Liabilities

127,138

 

205,241

 


 


Other Credits:


 


Deferred income taxes

139,850

 

117,505

Investment tax credit - deferred

2,394

 

2,736

Regulatory liabilities

18,477

 

18,814

Accrued pension and other postretirement benefits

122,946

 

137,286

Other deferred liabilities and other

48,343

 

36,083

Total Other Credits

332,010

 

312,424

 


 


Capitalization:


 


Common shareholders' equity

501,795

 

478,202

Long-term debt

320,942

 

272,408

Total Capitalization

822,737

 

750,610

Commitments and contingencies (see Footnote 18)

-

 

-

 


 


Total Liabilities and Capitalization

$1,281,885

 

$1,268,275


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the above consolidated financial statements



62




MGE Energy, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Capitalization

(In thousands)


 

At December 31,

 

2009

 

2008

Common Shareholders' Equity:

 

 

 

Common stock - par value $1 per share:


 

 

Authorized 50,000,000 shares


 


Issued 23,113,638 and 22,904,573 shares, respectively

$ 23,114

 

$22,905

Additional paid-in capital

316,268

 

310,202

Retained earnings

162,208

 

144,904

Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax

205

 

191

Total Common Shareholders' Equity

501,795

 

478,202

 


 


Redeemable Preferred Stock,


 


Cumulative, $25 par value, 1,175,000 authorized, but unissued

-

-

 


 


First Mortgage Bonds:


 


7.70%, 2028 Series

1,200

 

1,200

 


 


Other Long-Term Debt:


 


4.875% 2012 Series, Industrial Development Revenue Bonds

19,300

 

19,300

5.875% 2034 Series, Industrial Development Revenue Bonds

28,000

 

28,000

6.58%, due 2012

15,000

 

15,000

5.26%, due 2017

20,000

 

20,000

5.25%, due 2017

30,000

 

30,000

5.59%, due 2018

40,000

 

40,000

7.12%, due 2032

25,000

 

25,000

6.12%, due 2028

20,000

 

20,000

5.68%, due 2033

30,000

 

30,000

5.19%, due 2033

20,000

 

20,000

6.247%, due 2037

25,000

 

25,000

5.04%, due 2040

50,000

 

-

Total Other Long-Term Debt

322,300

 

272,300

Long-term debt due within one year

(1,528)

 

-

Unamortized discount

(1,030)

 

(1,092)

Total Long-Term Debt

320,942

 

272,408

 


 


Total Capitalization

$822,737

 

$750,610


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the above consolidated financial statements.



63




MGE Energy, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Common Equity and Comprehensive Income

(In thousands, except per-share amounts)


 

 

 

 


Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss)/Income

 

 

 


Additional

 

 

 

Common Stock

Paid-in

Retained

Comprehensive

 

Shares

Value

Capital

Earnings

Income

Total

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance – Dec. 31, 2006

20,975

$20,975

$248,406

$105,386

$581


$375,348

Net income




48,825


$48,825

48,825

Other comprehensive income/(loss):







 

Net unrealized gain on investments, net of $782 tax





1,167

1,167

1,167

Net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges, net of $71 tax





(105)

(105)

(105)

Total comprehensive income






$49,887

 

Common stock dividends declared ($1.41 per share)




(30,295)



(30,295)

Common stock issued, net

975

975

31,811




32,786

Ending Balance – Dec. 31, 2007

21,950

$21,950

$280,217

$123,916

$1,643


$427,726

 







 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income




52,768


$52,768

52,768

Other comprehensive income/(loss):







 

Net unrealized loss on investments, net of $189 tax

 






(282)

(282)

(282)

Reclassification of realized gain due to sale of investments, net of $751 tax





(1,120)

(1,120)

(1,120)

Net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges, net of $34 tax





(50)

(50)

(50)

Total comprehensive income






$51,316

 

Common stock dividends declared ($1.43 per share)




(31,780)



(31,780)

Common stock issued, net

955

955

29,985




30,940

Ending Balance – Dec. 31, 2008

22,905

$22,905

$310,202

$144,904

$191


$478,202

 







 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income




50,997


$50,997

50,997

Other comprehensive income/(loss):







 

Net unrealized gain on investments, net of $10 tax





14

14

14

Total comprehensive income






$51,011

 

Common stock dividends declared ($1.46 per share)




(33,693)



(33,693)

Common stock issued, net

209

209

6,066




6,275

Ending Balance – Dec. 31, 2009

23,114

$23,114

$316,268

$162,208

$205


$501,795

 







 


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the above consolidated financial statements.



64




Madison Gas and Electric Company

Consolidated Statements of Income

(In thousands)


 

For years ended December 31,

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

Operating Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

Regulated electric revenues

$332,324

 

$345,962

 

$334,488

Regulated gas revenues

192,334

 

242,598

 

197,925

Nonregulated revenues

9,161

 

7,433

 

5,181

Total Operating Revenues

533,819

 

595,993

 

537,594

 


 


 


Operating Expenses:


 


 


Fuel for electric generation

36,879

 

54,748

 

56,694

Purchased power

85,098

 

74,676

 

77,594

Cost of gas sold

123,062

 

171,545

 

140,838

Other operations and maintenance

144,429

 

150,677

 

130,390

Depreciation and amortization

41,080

 

39,273

 

32,199

Other general taxes

17,858

 

16,793

 

15,771

Income tax provision

23,973

 

24,837

 

24,932

Total Operating Expenses

472,379

 

532,549

 

478,418

Operating Income

61,440

 

63,444

 

59,176

 


 


 


Other Income and Deductions:


 


 


AFUDC - equity funds

473

 

858

 

1,927

Equity in earnings in ATC

8,173

 

7,241

 

6,047

Income tax provision

(3,338)

 

(2,289)

 

(2,153)

Other (deductions) income, net

(615)

 

(2,556)

 

(1,874)

Total Other Income and Deductions

4,693

 

3,254

 

3,947

Income before interest expense

66,133

 

66,698

 

63,123

 


 


 


Interest Expense:


 


 


Interest on long-term debt

16,417

 

16,133

 

15,664

Other interest, net

158

 

1,044

 

485

AFUDC – borrowed funds

(194)

 

(356)

 

(818)

Net Interest Expense

16,381

 

16,821

 

15,331

Net Income

$49,752

 

$49,877

 

$47,792

Less Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest, net of tax

(13,883)

 

(12,304)

 

(10,721)

Net Income Attributable to MGE

$35,869

 

$37,573

 

$37,071


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the above consolidated financial statements.



65




Madison Gas and Electric Company

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)


 

For the years ended December 31,

Operating Activities:

2009

 

2008

 

2007

Net income

$49,752

 

$49,877

 

$47,792

Items not affecting cash:


 


 


Depreciation and amortization

41,080

 

39,273

 

32,199

Deferred income taxes

16,508

 

8,454

 

714

Provision for doubtful receivables

3,409

 

4,273

 

3,080

AFUDC - equity funds

(473)

 

(858)

 

(1,927)

Employee benefit plan expenses

7,167

 

7,891

 

8,101

Equity earnings in ATC

(8,173)

 

(7,241)

 

(6,047)

Gain on sale of investments

-

 

(765)

 

(778)

Other items

2,564

 

3,469

 

4,330

Changes in working capital items:


 


 


Receivable - margin account

11,256

 

(12,478)

 

694

Trade and other receivables, net

11,112

 

(6,973)

 

(12,511)

Inventories

9,972

 

(12,538)

 

4,099

Unbilled revenues

5,522

 

(4,331)

 

(4,332)

Prepaid Taxes

(4,820)

 

(764)

 

(948)

Other current assets

2,411

 

(1,970)

 

1,125

Accounts payable

(9,004)

 

(658)

 

3,968

Accrued interest and taxes

(4,182)

 

159

 

698

Reserve for fuel refund

269

 

5,506

 

-

Other current liabilities

(4,746)

 

362

 

(401)

Proceeds from Congestion Cost and Line Loss Allocation Agreement

-

 

-

 

2,545

Dividend income from ATC

6,285

 

5,272

 

4,441

Cash contributions to pension and other postretirement plans

(15,278)

 

(7,665)

 

(6,346)

Other noncurrent items, net

633

 

6,012

 

(1,954)

Cash Provided by Operating Activities

121,264

 

74,307

 

78,542

Investing Activities:


 


 


Capital expenditures

(77,929)

 

(105,777)

 

(136,258)

Capital contributions to ATC and other investments

(3,551)

 

(3,518)

 

(55)

Repayment (Advance) to WEPCO for ATC Elm Road Work

3,300

 

(330)

 

(138)

Proceeds from sale of investments

-

 

1,070

 

910

Other

(164)

 

1,706

 

1,404

Cash Used for Investing Activities

(78,344)

 

(106,849)

 

(134,137)

Financing Activities:


 


 


Cash dividends paid to parent by MGE

(19,318)

 

-

 

(15,621)

Cash dividends paid to parent from Power West Campus and Transco

(12,648)

 

(12,702)

 

(13,044)

Capital contribution from parent

-

 

7,500

 

-

Equity contribution received by Transco, Power Elm Road,

and Power West Campus

3,551

 

37,527

 

43,373

Affiliate Financing of Elm Road

4,151

 

-

 

-

Repayment of long-term debt

-

 

(30,000)

 

(15,000)

Issuance of long-term debt

-

 

40,000

 

25,000

(Decrease) increase in short-term debt

(17,500)

 

(10,000)

 

31,500

Other

-

 

(324)

 

-

Cash Provided by (Used for) Financing Activities

(41,764)

 

32,001

 

56,208

Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents

1,156

 

(541)

 

613

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

1,318

 

1,859

 

1,246

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$2,474

 

$1,318

 

$1,859

 


 


 


Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:


 


 


Interest paid

$15,960

 

$16,660

 

$15,673

Income taxes paid

$25

 

$4,514

 

$4,901

Income taxes received

$(1)

 

$(185)

 

$(33)


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the above consolidated financial statements.



66




Madison Gas and Electric Company

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands)

 

At December 31,

ASSETS

2009

 

2008

Utility Plant (At Original Cost, In Service):

 

 

 

Electric

$806,083

 

$773,605

Gas

293,666

 

279,483

Nonregulated

110,022

 

110,317

Gross plant in service

1,209,771

 

1,163,405

Less accumulated provision for depreciation

(490,354)

 

(461,037)

Net plant in service

719,417

 

702,368

Construction work in progress

219,967

 

198,694

Total Utility Plant

939,384

 

901,062

Investment in ATC

51,656

 

46,217

Other investments

897

 

965

Total Investments

52,553

 

47,182

Current Assets:


 


Cash and cash equivalents

2,474

 

1,318

Receivable – margin account

3,495

 

4,805

Accounts receivable, less reserves of $3,701 and $4,076, respectively

35,279

 

45,266

Affiliate receivables

2,572

 

2,547

Other accounts receivable, less reserves of $541 and $200, respectively

3,038

 

7,575

Unbilled revenues

29,179

 

34,701

Materials and supplies, at average cost

15,931

 

15,592

Fossil fuel

7,870

 

3,228

Stored natural gas, at average cost

27,193

 

42,146

Prepaid taxes

18,833

 

14,013

Regulatory assets - current

-

 

9,876

Other current assets

8,295

 

10,804

Total Current Assets

154,159

 

191,871

Other long-term receivables

2,149

 

2,390

Special billing projects

821

 

464

Affiliate receivable long-term

5,972

 

6,433

Regulatory assets

113,375

 

116,165

Other deferred assets and other

5,142

 

5,555

Total Assets

$1,273,555

 

$1,271,122

CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES


 


Equity:


 


Common stockholder equity

$390,782

 

$374,253

Noncontrolling interest

178,943

 

174,157

Total Equity

569,725

 

548,410

Long-term debt

272,470

 

272,408

Total Capitalization

842,195

 

820,818

Current Liabilities:


 


Short-term debt - commercial paper

33,500

 

51,000

Accounts payable

35,826

 

47,186

Affiliate payables

4,217

 

63

Accrued interest and taxes

6,125

 

10,307

Accrued payroll related items

7,870

 

7,380

Deferred income taxes

2

 

3,305

Regulatory liabilities - current

551

 

5,974

Pension liability - current

798

 

813

Other current liabilities

11,825

 

11,987

Total Current Liabilities

100,714

 

138,015

Other Credits:


 


Deferred income taxes

138,486

 

117,369

Investment tax credit - deferred

2,394

 

2,736

Regulatory liabilities

18,477

 

18,814

Accrued pension and other postretirement benefits

122,946

 

137,286

Other deferred liabilities and other

48,343

 

36,084

Total Other Credits

330,646

 

312,289

Commitments and contingencies (see Footnote 18)

-

 

-

Total Capitalization and Liabilities

$1,273,555

 

$1,271,122


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the above consolidated financial statements.



67




Madison Gas and Electric Company

Consolidated Capitalization Statement

(In thousands)


 

At December 31,

 

2009

 

2008

Common Stockholder Equity:

 

 

 

Common stock - par value $1 per share:

 

 

 

Authorized 50,000,000 shares

 

 

 

Outstanding 17,347,894

$17,348

 

$17,348

Additional paid-in capital

192,417

 

192,417

Retained earnings

180,905

 

164,354

Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax

112

 

134

Total Common Stockholder Equity

390,782

 

374,253

 


 


Noncontrolling Interest

178,943

 

174,157

Total Equity

569,725

 

548,410

 


 


Redeemable Preferred Stock,


 


Cumulative, $25 par value, 1,175,000 authorized, but unissued

-

-

 


 


First Mortgage Bonds:


 


7.70%, 2028 Series

1,200

 

1,200

 


 


Other Long-Term Debt:


 


4.875% 2012 Series, Industrial Development Revenue Bonds

19,300

 

19,300

5.875% 2034 Series, Industrial Development Revenue Bonds

28,000

 

28,000

6.58%, due 2012

15,000

 

15,000

5.26%, due 2017

20,000

 

20,000

5.25%, due 2017

30,000

 

30,000

5.59%, due 2018

40,000

 

40,000

7.12%, due 2032

25,000

 

25,000

6.12%, due 2028

20,000

 

20,000

5.68%, due 2033

30,000

 

30,000

5.19%, due 2033

20,000

 

20,000

6.247%, due 2037

25,000

 

25,000

Total Other Long-Term Debt

272,300

 

272,300

Unamortized discount

(1,030)

 

(1,092)

Total Long-Term Debt

272,470

 

272,408

 


 


Total Capitalization

$842,195

 

$820,818


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the above consolidated financial statements.



68




Madison Gas and Electric Company

Consolidated Statements of Common Equity and Comprehensive Income

(In thousands)


815

(105)

2008

(425)

(50)

 

 

Additional

Paid-in

Capital

Retained

Earnings

Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss)/Income

 

Comprehensive

Income

Total

 

Non-

Common Stock

Controlling

Shares

Value

Interest

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance – Dec. 31, 2006

17,348

$17,348

$184,917

$105,331

$188

$95,978


$403,762

Net income




37,071


10,721

$47,792

47,792

Other comprehensive income/(loss):









Net unrealized gain on investments, net of $546 tax









 


815

815

Net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges, net of $71 tax









 


(105)

(105)

Total comprehensive income







$48,502


Common stock dividends declared

 




(15,621)




(15,621)

Equity Contribution received by noncontrolling interest






43,373

 

43,373

Distributions to parent from noncontrolling interest






(13,044)

 

(13,044)

Ending balance – Dec. 31, 2007

17,348

$17,348

$184,917

$126,781

$898

$137,028

 

$ 466,972

 

 

 

 

 

 





 

 









Net income




37,573


12,304

$49,877

49,877

Other comprehensive income/(loss):









Net unrealized loss on investments, net of $285 tax









 


(425)

(425)

Reclassification of realized gain due to sale of investments, net of $194 tax





(289)


(289)

(289)

Net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges, net of $34 tax









 


(50)

(50)

Total comprehensive income







$49,113


Capital Contribution from parent



7,500



 

 

7,500

Equity Contribution received by noncontrolling interest






37,527

 

37,527

Distributions to parent from noncontrolling interest






(12,702)

 

(12,702)

Ending balance – Dec. 31, 2008

17,348

$17,348

$192,417

$164,354

$134

$174,157

 

$548,410

 









2009









Net income




35,869


13,883

$49,752

49,752

Other comprehensive income/(loss):









Net unrealized loss on investments, net of $15 tax





(22)


(22)

(22)

Total comprehensive income







$49,730


Common stock dividends declared




(19,318)


 

 

(19,318)

Equity Contribution received by noncontrolling interest






3,551

 

3,551

Distributions to parent from noncontrolling interest






(12,648)

 

(12,648)

Ending balance – Dec. 31, 2009

17,348

$17,348

$192,417

$180,905

$112

$178,943

 

$569,725


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the above consolidated financial statements.



69




Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007


This report is a combined report of MGE Energy and MGE. The notes to the consolidated financial statements that follow include consolidated MGE Energy footnotes and certain footnotes related to MGE as signified below.


1.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.


a.

Regulation and System of Accounts - MGE Energy and MGE.


Accounting policies for regulated operations are in accordance with those policies prescribed by the regulatory authorities having jurisdiction, principally the PSCW and FERC. MGE's accounting records conform to the FERC uniform system of accounts.


b.

Principles of Consolidation - MGE Energy and MGE.


MGE, a wholly owned subsidiary of MGE Energy, is a regulated electric and gas utility headquartered in Madison, Wisconsin. MGE is the majority owner of MGE Transco. MGE Transco is a nonregulated entity formed to manage the investment in ATC.


Wholly owned subsidiaries of MGE Energy include CWDC, MAGAEL, MGE Construct, and MGE Power. MGE Power owns 100% of MGE Power West Campus and MGE Power Elm Road. MGE Power and its subsidiaries are part MGE Energy's nonregulated energy operations, which were formed to own and lease new electric generation projects to assist MGE.


MGE consolidates the financial statements of entities in which it has a controlling financial interest. MGE has consolidated MGE Power West Campus and MGE Power Elm Road. Both entities are variable interest entities (VIEs) under applicable accounting requirements. See Footnotes 2 and 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more discussion of these entities.


The consolidated financial statements reflect the application of certain accounting policies described in this note. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.


c.

Use of Estimates - MGE Energy and MGE.


In order to prepare consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management must make estimates and assumptions. These estimates could affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from management's estimates.


d.

Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash - MGE Energy and MGE.


MGE Energy and MGE consider all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.


MGE has certain cash accounts that are restricted to uses other than current operations and designated for a specific purpose. MGE's restricted cash accounts include cash held by trustees for certain employee benefits. These are included in other current assets.


e.

Receivable – margin account - MGE Energy and MGE.


Cash amounts held by counterparties as margin for certain financial transactions are recorded as Receivable – margin account. The balance is shown net of any collateral posted against derivatives positions. As of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the balance is shown net of $0.6 million and $10.5 million, respectively. Changes in this cash account are considered cash flows from operating activities to match with the costs being hedged. The costs being hedged are fuel for electric generation, purchased power, and cost of gas sold.




70




f.

Trade Receivables, Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, and Concentration Risk - MGE Energy and MGE.


Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. However, a 1% late payment charge is recorded on all receivables unpaid after the due date. The allowance for doubtful accounts associated with these receivables represents our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our existing accounts receivable. We determine our allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical write-off experience, regional economic data, and review of the accounts receivable aging.


MGE is obligated to provide service to all electric and gas customers within its franchised territories. MGE's franchised electric territory includes a 316 square-mile area in Dane County, Wisconsin, and MGE's franchised gas territory includes a service area covering 1,631 square miles in Wisconsin. MGE manages this concentration and the related credit risk through its credit and collection policies, which are consistent with state regulatory requirements.


g.

Inventories - MGE Energy and MGE.


Inventories consist of natural gas in storage, fossil fuels, materials and supplies, SO2 allowances and renewable energy credits (RECs). MGE values natural gas in storage, coal at the Columbia facility, and materials and supplies using average cost. MGE values coal at Blount using last-in-first-out pricing (LIFO).


At December 31, 2009 and 2008, $0.2 million and $0.8 million, respectively, of the fossil fuel inventory at Blount was valued using LIFO. This inventory at current cost exceeds the LIFO stated value by $0.6 million and $0.7 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Additionally, during 2009 and 2008, liquidation of LIFO layers, carried at costs that were lower than current purchases, resulted in a decrease to costs of goods sold of $0.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively.


SO2 emission allowances are included in inventory and are recorded at weighted average cost. These allowances are charged to fuel expense as they are used in operations. MGE's emission allowance balances as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, were $0.6 million and $0.8 million, respectively.


REC allowances are included in inventory and are recorded based on specific identification. MGE's REC allowance balances as of December 31, 2009, were $1.3 million.


h.

Regulatory Assets and Liabilities - MGE Energy and MGE.


Consistent with regulatory treatment, MGE capitalizes as regulatory assets incurred costs that are expected to be recovered in future electric and natural gas rates. MGE also records as regulatory liabilities obligations to customers to refund previously collected revenue or to spend revenue collected from customers on future costs.


i.

Debt Issuance Costs - MGE Energy and MGE.


Premiums, discounts, and expenses incurred with the issuance of outstanding long-term debt are amortized over the life of the debt issue. Any call premiums or unamortized expenses associated with refinancing higher-cost debt obligations used to finance utility-regulated assets and operations are amortized consistent with regulatory treatment of those items.


j.

Property, Plant, and Equipment - MGE Energy and MGE.


Property, plant, and equipment is recorded at original cost. Cost includes indirect costs consisting of payroll taxes, pensions, postretirement benefits, other fringe benefits, and administrative and general costs. Also, included in the cost is AFUDC for utility property and capitalized interest for nonregulated property. Additions for significant replacements of property are charged to property, plant, and equipment at cost; minor items are charged to maintenance expense. The cost of removal of utility property less salvage value is charged to accumulated depreciation when property is retired. Depreciation rates on utility property are approved by the PSCW, are based on the estimated economic lives of property, and include estimates for salvage value and removal costs. Depreciation rates on nonregulated property are based on the estimated economic lives of the property.




71




Provisions at composite straight-line depreciation rates approximate the following percentages for the cost of depreciable property:


 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

Electric

3.6%

 

3.7%

 

3.1%

Gas

3.3%

 

3.3%

 

3.3%

Nonregulated

2.5%

 

2.5%

 

2.5%


k.

Repairs and Maintenance Expense - MGE Energy and MGE.


MGE utilizes the direct expensing method for planned major maintenance projects. Under this method, MGE expenses all costs associated with major planned maintenance activities as incurred.


l.

Purchased Gas Adjustment Clause - MGE Energy and MGE.


MGE's natural gas rates are subject to a fuel adjustment clause designed to recover or refund the difference between the actual cost of purchased gas and the amount included in rates. Differences between the amounts billed to customers and the actual costs recoverable are deferred and recovered or refunded in future periods by means of prospective monthly adjustments to rates. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, MGE had over collected $7.6 million and $6.1 million, respectively. These amounts were recorded in other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.


m.

Revenue Recognition - MGE Energy and MGE.


Operating revenues are recorded as service is rendered or energy is delivered to customers. At the end of the month, MGE accrues an estimate for the unbilled amount of energy delivered to customers. See Footnote 1w for further discussion of unbilled revenues.


MGE's rates include a provision for fuel costs. MGE records an adjustment to revenues for a fuel credit at the time MGE's actual fuel costs fall below the bandwidth prescribed by the PSCW and MGE concludes that it is probable that the credit will be approved by the PSCW staff. MGE will also record an adjustment to revenue when the PSCW institutes a "subject to refund" provision in an order. See Footnote 17 for further discussion of the fuel rules.


n.

Capitalized Interest - MGE Energy and MGE.


MGE Energy, through its subsidiary MGE Power Elm Road, calculates capitalized interest on construction projects for periods where financing is provided by MGE Energy through interim debt.


o.

Allowance for Funds Used During Construction - MGE Energy and MGE.


Allowance for funds used during construction is included in utility plant accounts and represents the cost of borrowed funds used during plant construction and a return on shareholders' capital used for construction purposes. In the Consolidated Income Statements, the cost of borrowed funds (AFUDC-debt) is presented as an offset to interest expense and the return on shareholders' capital (AFUDC-equity funds) is shown as an item within other income. As approved by the PSCW, MGE capitalized AFUDC-debt and equity on 50% of applicable average construction work in progress during 2009 at 8.77%. Also, MGE received specific approval to recover 100% AFUDC on certain environmental costs for Columbia. Although the allowance does not represent current cash income, it is recovered under the ratemaking process over the service lives of the related properties.


p.

Investments - MGE Energy and MGE.


Investments in the common stock of companies in which MGE Energy or MGE's ownership interest is 50% or less and in which MGE Energy or MGE exercises significant influence over operating and financial policies are accounted for using the equity method. All other investments are carried at fair value or at cost, as appropriate.




72




q.

Capitalized Software Costs - MGE Energy and MGE.


Property, plant and equipment includes the capitalized costs of internal use software totaling $9.5 million at December 31, 2009, and $8.5 million at December 31, 2008. During 2009 and 2008, MGE recorded $1.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively, of amortization expense related to these costs. These costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. For internal use software, the useful lives range from five to ten years.


r.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets - MGE Energy and MGE.


MGE reviews plant and equipment and other property for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. MGE's policy for determining when long-lived assets are impaired is to recognize an impairment loss if the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) from an asset are less than the carrying amount of that asset. If an impairment loss is recognized, the amount that will be recorded will be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. MGE believes there is no impairment of long-lived assets at December 31, 2009.


s.

Income Taxes and Excise Taxes - MGE Energy and MGE.


Income taxes

Under the liability method, income taxes are deferred for all temporary differences between pretax financial and taxable income and between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities using the tax rates scheduled by law to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. Future tax benefits are recognized to the extent that realization of such benefits is more likely than not. A valuation allowance is recorded for those benefits that do not meet this criterion.


Accounting for uncertainty in income taxes applies to all tax positions and requires a recognition threshold and measurement standard for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken, or expected to be taken, in an income tax return. The threshold is defined for recognizing tax return positions in the financial statements as "more likely than not" that the position is sustainable, based on its merits. Subsequent recognition, derecognition, and measurement is based on management's best judgment given the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date.


Regulation and accounting principles have resulted in a regulatory liability related to income taxes. Excess deferred income taxes result from past taxes provided at rates higher than current rates. The income tax regulatory liability and deferred investment tax credit reflect the revenue requirement associated with the return of these tax benefits to customers.


Investment tax credits from regulated operations are amortized over related property service lives.


The 2009, 2008, and 2007 tax credits for the generation of electricity from wind are based on kWh produced and sold during the years at the statutory tax credit rate of 2.1 cents per kWh or $2.0 million for 2009, 2.1 cents per kWh or $2.0 million for 2008 and 2.0 cents per kWh or $0.5 million for 2007.


For 2009 tax return purposes, MGE Energy and MGE will change its income tax methods of accounting for repairs based on current Treasury Regulations and case law. The change in income tax methods of accounting involves, among other things, identification of appropriate units of property for repair work and computation of cumulative one-time tax deduction able to be claimed in 2009. The effect on the 2009 financial statements of the cumulative adjustment is an increase to deferred tax expense and a corresponding decrease in the current tax provision in the amount of about $9.2 million. The tax method change did not have an impact on income before income tax expense in the income statements of MGE Energy and MGE.


Excise taxes

MGE Energy, through its utility operations, pays a state license fee tax in lieu of property taxes on property used in utility operations. License fee tax is calculated as a percentage of adjusted operating revenues of the prior year. The electric tax rate is 3.19% for retail sales and 1.59% for sales of electricity for resale by the purchaser. The tax rate on sales of natural gas is 0.97%. The tax is required to be estimated and prepaid in the year prior to its computation and expensing. License fee tax expense, included in other general taxes, was $13.7 million, $12.7 million, and $11.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.



73




Operating income taxes, including tax credits, and license fee tax are included in rates for utility related items.


t.

Share-Based Compensation - MGE Energy and MGE.


The MGE Energy Board approved a Performance Unit Plan on December 15, 2006. Under the plan, eligible participants may receive performance units that entitle the holder to receive a cash payment equal to the value of a designated number of shares of MGE Energy's common stock, plus dividend equivalent payments thereon, at the end of the set vesting period. Per the plan's provisions, these awards are subject to a prescribed vesting schedule and must be settled in cash. Accordingly, no new shares of common stock will be issued in connection with the plan.


MGE Energy and MGE will initially measure the cost of the employee services received in exchange for the award based on current market value of MGE Energy common stock. The fair value of the award will be subsequently re-measured at each reporting date through the settlement date. Changes in fair value during the requisite period will be recognized as compensation cost over that period.


u.

Treasury Stock - MGE Energy.


Treasury shares are recorded at cost. Any shares of common stock repurchased are held as treasury shares unless cancelled or reissued.


v.

Comprehensive Income - MGE Energy and MGE.


Total Comprehensive income includes all changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investments by and distributions to shareholders. Comprehensive income is reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Common Equity and Comprehensive Income.


w.

Unbilled Revenues - MGE Energy and MGE.


Revenues from the sale of electricity and gas to customers are recorded when electricity/gas is delivered to those customers. The quantity of those sales is measured by customers' meters, and customers' bills are based on readings of those meters. However, due to the large number of those meters, it is impractical to read all of the meters at month-end. Meters are therefore read on a systematic basis throughout the month based on established meter-reading schedules. At the end of any month, there exists a quantity of electric and gas service that has been delivered but not metered or billed. Management must estimate this usage and related revenue. This estimate represents electricity and gas delivered to customers between their meter-read date and the end of the period.


In order to estimate unbilled revenues as of the end of a particular period, MGE performs a series of calculations based upon actual and estimated numbers and assumptions. MGE begins by calculating the amount of electricity and gas available for sale within its system during that period based upon known inputs (i.e., electricity purchases from third parties, gas pipeline reads, and MGE-generated electricity). These amounts are then adjusted to deduct the amounts actually included in customers' bills for that period.


In the case of electricity, the amount is further reduced by estimating the quantity of electricity lost in the process of transmitting and distributing it to customers. The resulting unbilled quantities are then allocated to various customer classes based upon historical utilization patterns for those customers. MGE applies published tariffs to determine the associated revenues. Utilization patterns are based upon assumptions regarding weather, economic conditions, and consistency of use over the period in question. Actual use can be affected by variations in those items. The resulting estimate is then compared to other available statistics, including billed sales for the particular period, in order to confirm its reasonableness. MGE monitors the reasonableness of the unbilled revenue estimate through the review of ratios such as unbilled electric consumption compared to billed electric sales.




74




In the case of gas, the gross amount available for sale is adjusted by the estimated gas loss factor, which reflects an estimate of distribution system losses and heat content differentials between pipeline and distribution delivered volumes. The resulting available for sale to consumers amount, which is derived from daily pipeline reads, is then compared against the sales billed for the month, with the remainder equaling the estimated amount unbilled for the month. The estimated unbilled consumption for the month is then allocated across the applicable customer categories where an average per unit rate is applied to calculate the unbilled gas revenue. The estimated unbilled consumption is compared to various statistics, including unbilled as a percent of available for sale, change in unbilled month to month and change in unbilled compared to the prior year in order to confirm its reasonableness. Additionally on an annual basis the estimated gas loss factor is reviewed to determine if it is reasonable or whether a change in estimate should be made.


x.

Derivative and Hedging Instruments - MGE Energy and MGE.


As part of regular operations, MGE enters into contracts including options, swaps, futures, forwards, and other contractual commitments to manage its exposure to interest rates, commodity prices, and gas margin. MGE recognizes all derivatives in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value, with changes in the fair value of derivative instruments to be recorded in current earnings or deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), depending on whether a derivative is designated as, and is effective as, a hedge and on the type of hedge transaction. Derivative activities are in accordance with the company's risk management policy.


If the derivative qualifies for regulatory deferral, the derivatives are marked to fair value and any resulting loss or gain is offset with a corresponding regulatory asset or liability. Cash flows from such derivative instruments are classified on a basis consistent with the nature of the underlying hedged item.


2.

Variable Interest Entities - MGE Energy and MGE.


a.

MGE Power West Campus.


MGE Power West Campus is not a subsidiary of MGE; however, it has been consolidated in the financial statements of MGE. MGE Power West Campus was created for the purpose of owning new generating assets. MGE Power West Campus' sole principal asset is the WCCF, which it leases to MGE pursuant to a long-term lease. MGE is responsible for operation of the plant during the term of the lease. Based on the nature and terms of these contractual relationships, MGE absorbs a majority of the expected losses, residual value, or both, associated with the ownership and operation of the WCCF. MGE is also the party most closely associated with MGE Power West Campus. As a result, MGE is the primary beneficiary and MGE Power West Campus is a VIE. At December 31, 2009, MGE has included the following significant accounts on its balance sheet related to its interest in the VIE:


(In thousands)

 

Net plant in service, nonregulated

$96,294

Affiliate receivables

$8,501

Accrued interest and taxes

$6,959

Deferred income taxes

$19,180

Long-term debt

$50,000

Noncontrolling interest

$28,996


Long-term debt consists of $50.0 million of senior secured notes that require that MGE Power West Campus maintain a projected debt service coverage ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1.00, and debt to total capitalization ratio of not more than .65 to 1.00. The debt is secured by a collateral assignment of lease payments that MGE is making to MGE Power West Campus for use of the cogeneration facility pursuant to the long-term lease.


MGE has been and will continue to recover lease payments made to MGE Power West Campus in rates. Also, MGE received approval from the PSCW to collect approximately $12.1 million in carrying costs incurred by MGE Power West Campus during construction of the facility. The carrying costs are being recovered in rates over a 10 year period that started in 2005.




75




b.

MGE Power Elm Road.


MGE Power Elm Road is not a subsidiary of MGE; however, it has been consolidated in the financial statements of MGE. MGE Power Elm Road was created for the purpose of owning new generating assets. MGE Power Elm Road's sole principal assets are an 8.33% undivided ownership interest in two 615 MW coal-fired generating plants being constructed in Oak Creek, Wisconsin, which it leases to MGE pursuant to long-term leases. Based on the nature and terms of this contractual relationship, MGE is expected to absorb a majority of the expected losses, residual value, or both, associated with MGE Power Elm Road's ownership interest in these plants. MGE is also the party most closely associated with MGE Power Elm Road. As a result, MGE is the primary beneficiary and MGE Power Elm Road is a VIE. At December 31, 2009, MGE has included the following significant accounts on its balance sheet related to its interest in the VIE:


(In thousands)

 

Construction work in progress

$182,535

Deferred income taxes

$8,334

Noncontrolling interest

$140,152


Once the units become operational, MGE will recover in rates the lease payments made to MGE Power Elm Road. Also, MGE received approval from the PSCW to collect in rates the carrying costs incurred by MGE Power Elm Road. See footnote 21 for additional discussion.


c.

Shared Savings Program.


MGE assesses whether the participants within its Shared Savings program constitute VIEs in which MGE might be considered to be the consolidating entity. MGE has reviewed 95.2% of the total current Shared Savings program balance and has determined that under applicable accounting guidance, these are not applicable via the "business scope exception." For the remaining 4.8% of the total current Shared Savings program balance, these entities are not legally obligated to provide the financial information to MGE that is necessary to determine whether MGE must consolidate these entities. MGE will continue to attempt to obtain information from these customers in order to determine whether they should be consolidated by MGE.


3.

Property, Plant, and Equipment - MGE Energy and MGE.


Property, plant, and equipment consisted of the following at December 31:


 

MGE Energy

 

MGE

(In thousands)

2009

2008

 

2009

2008

Utility:

 

 

 

 

 

Electric

$806,066

$773,588


$806,083

$773,605

Gas

293,654

279,472


293,666

279,483

Total utility plant

1,099,720

1,053,060


1,099,749

1,053,088

Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization

477,210

450,334


477,210

450,334

In-service utility plant, net

622,510

602,726


622,539

602,754

Nonregulated:






Nonregulated

110,431

110,526


110,022

110,317

Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization

13,144

10,703


13,144

10,703

In service nonregulated plant, net

97,287

99,823


96,878

99,614

Construction work in progress:






Utility construction work in progress

37,431

41,817


37,431

41,817

Nonregulated construction work in progress

182,536

156,877


182,536

156,877

Total property, plant, and equipment

$939,764

$901,243


$939,384

$901,062


MGE's utility plant is subject to the lien of its Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust. As of December 31, 2009, there was $1.2 million of bonds outstanding under that indenture. See Footnote 9 for further discussion of the mortgage indenture.




76




4.

Investments - MGE Energy and MGE.


a.

Equity Method Investments and Available for Sale Securities.


(In thousands)

2009

 

2008

 

MGE Energy

 

MGE

 

MGE Energy

 

MGE

Available for sale securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost basis

$1,363

 

$616

 

$1,254

 

$632

Gross unrealized gains

346

 

191

 

332

 

236

Gross unrealized losses

(4)

 

(4)

 

(13)

 

(13)

Fair Value

$1,705

 

$803

 

$1,573

 

$855

 


 


 


 


Equity method investments:


 


 


 


ATC

$ 51,656

 

$51,656

 

$ 46,217

 

$46,217

Other

94

 

94

 

110

 

110

Total equity method investments

$ 51,750

 

$51,750

 

$ 46,327

 

$46,327

 


 


 


 


Total

$53,455

 

$52,553

 

$ 47,900

 

$47,182


MGE Energy's and MGE's available for sale securities represent publicly traded securities and private equity investments in common stock of companies in various industries.


During the year ended December 31, 2009, certain investments were liquidated. As a result of these liquidations, MGE received $0.1 million in cash proceeds and recorded a $0.1 million gain on the sale of investments.


During the year ended December 31, 2008, certain investments were liquidated. As a result of these liquidations, MGE Energy and MGE received $3.6 million and $1.1 million, respectively, in cash proceeds and recorded a $3.1 million and $0.8 million, respectively, gain on the sale of investments.


b.

ATC.


ATC owns and operates electric transmission facilities primarily in Wisconsin. MGE received an interest in ATC when it, like other Wisconsin electric utilities, contributed its electric transmission facilities to ATC. That interest is presently held by MGE Transco, which is jointly owned by MGE Energy and MGE.


MGE Transco, through MGE, has a seat on the Board of Directors of ATC and has a 20% voting ownership interest in ATC Management, Inc. Due to MGE Transco's ability to exercise significant control over management activities, MGE Transco has accounted for its investment in ATC under the equity method of accounting. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, MGE Transco recorded equity earnings from the investment in ATC of $8.2 million, $7.2 million, and $6.0 million, respectively. Dividend income received from ATC was $6.3 million, $5.3 million, and $4.4 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, MGE Transco made $3.6 million and $3.4 million, respectively, in cash contributions to ATC. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, MGE Transco made no cash contributions to ATC.


At December 31, 2009, MGE Transco held a 3.6% ownership interest in ATC. MGE Transco's investment balance is different from the amount of the underlying equity in the net assets of ATC. This difference is attributable to the allocation of certain tax impacts related to the initial asset transfer.


At December 31, 2009, MGE is the majority owner, and MGE Energy, the holding company, is the minority owner of MGE Transco. MGE Energy's proportionate share of the equity and net income of MGE Transco is classified within the MGE financial statements as noncontrolling interest.




77




ATC's summarized financial data for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 is as follows:


(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Income statement data for the twelve

months ended December 31,

2009

 

2008

 

2007

Operating revenues

$521,525

 

$466,571


$408,019

Operating expenses

(230,316)

 

(208,960)


(198,179)

Other (expense) income

(621)

 

(514)


78

Interest expense, net

(77,223)

 

(69,052)


(55,829)

Earnings before members' income taxes

$213,365

 

$188,045


$154,089

 


 




MGE Energy's and MGE's equity earnings in ATC

$8,173

 

$7,241


$6,047

 


 




Balance sheet data as of December 31,

2009

 

2008

 

2007

Current assets

$51,121

 

$50,791


$48,329

Noncurrent assets

2,767,249

 

2,480,034


2,188,970

Total assets

$2,818,370

 

$2,530,825


$2,237,299

 


 




Current liabilities

$285,494

 

$252,035


$317,105

Long-term debt

1,259,643

 

1,109,397


899,127

Other noncurrent liabilities

76,837

 

120,171


108,494

Members' equity

1,196,396

 

1,049,222


912,573

Total members' equity and liabilities

$2,818,370

 

$2,530,825


$2,237,299


5.

Joint Plant Ownership - MGE Energy and MGE.


a.

Columbia.


MGE and two other utilities jointly own Columbia, a coal-fired generating facility, which accounts for 29% (225 MW) of MGE's net summer rated capacity. Power from this facility is shared in proportion to each company's ownership interest. MGE has a 22% ownership interest in Columbia. The other owners are WPL (a subsidiary of Alliant), which operates Columbia, and WPSC. MGE's share of fuel, operating, and maintenance expenses for Columbia were $30.1 million, $32.6 million, and $31.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. See Footnote 18 for discussion of MGE's future capital commitments as a result of this ownership interest.


Each owner provides its own financing and reflects its respective portion of facilities and operating costs in its financial statements. MGE's interest in Columbia, included in its gross utility plant in service, and the related accumulated depreciation reserves at December 31 were as follows:


(In thousands)

2009

 

2008

Utility plant

$112,879

 

$113,592

Accumulated depreciation

(72,399)

 

(71,173)

Net plant

$40,480

 

$42,419


b.

WCCF.


MGE Power West Campus and the UW jointly own the West Campus Cogeneration Facility located on the UW campus. MGE Power West Campus owns 55% of the facility and UW owns 45% of the facility. The UW owns a controlling interest in the chilled-water and steam plants, which are used to meet the growing needs for air-conditioning and steam-heat capacity for the UW campus. MGE Power West Campus owns a controlling interest in the electric generation plant, which is leased and operated by MGE.



78




Each owner provides its own financing and reflects its respective portion of the facility and operating costs in its financial statements. MGE Power West Campus' interest in WCCF and the related accumulated depreciation reserves at December 31 were as follows:


(In thousands)

2009

 

2008

Nonregulated plant

$109,071

 

$109,111

Accumulated depreciation

(12,777)

 

(10,033)

Net plant

$96,294

 

$99,078


Operating charges are allocated to the UW based on formulas contained in the operating agreement. Under the provisions of this arrangement, the UW is required to reimburse MGE for their allocated portion of fuel and operating expenses. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, the UW allocated share of fuel and operating costs were $2.6 million, $4.8 million, and $3.0 million, respectively.


c.

Elm Road.


See Footnote 21 for a discussion of MGE Power Elm Road's joint ownership interest in the Elm Road Units.


6.

Regulatory Assets and Liabilities - MGE Energy and MGE.


The following regulatory assets and liabilities are reflected in MGE's consolidated balance sheet as of December 31:


(In thousands)

2009

 

2008

Regulatory Assets

 

 

 

Environmental costs

$823

 

$1,097

Regulatory asset – Derivatives

12,823

 

14,007

Tax recovery related to AFUDC equity

4,465

 

4,443

Asset retirement obligation

5,002

 

4,389

Unfunded pension and other postretirement liability

76,823

 

95,231

Debt related costs

4,144

 

4,323

Regulatory assets - Elm Road

456

 

213

Blount restructuring costs

899

 

718

 


 


Pension and OPRB costs

7,713

 

-

Conservation costs

-

 

1,124

Other

227

 

496

Total regulatory assets

$113,375

 

$126,041

Regulatory Liabilities


 


Regulatory liability - Derivatives

$282

 

$-

Conservation costs

314

 

-

Regulatory liability – Income Taxes

3,914

 

4,680

Regulatory liability - Medicare subsidy

557

 

1,090

Non-ARO removal cost

12,216

 

12,799

Regulatory liability - customer fuel credit

269

 

5,506

Deferred charges related to ATC

-

 

468

Renewable energy credits

1,318

 

-

Other

158

 

245

Total regulatory liabilities

$19,028

 

$24,788


MGE expects to recover its regulatory assets and return its regulatory liabilities through rates charged to customers based on PSCW decisions made during the ratemaking process or based on PSCW long-standing policies and guidelines. The adjustments to rates for these regulatory assets and liabilities will occur over the periods either specified by the PSCW or over the corresponding period related to the asset or liability. We believe it is probable that MGE will continue to recover from customers the regulatory assets described above based on prior and current ratemaking treatment for such costs. MGE is earning a return on all regulatory assets net of any related liabilities, except for amounts expended for environmental costs.




79




Environmental Costs

MGE has received regulatory treatment on environmental costs including clean up of two landfill sites and a substation site and certain environmental costs at Columbia. As it relates to the landfills and substation, the regulators have only allowed MGE to recover actual environmental expenditures incurred excluding any carrying cost. As of December 31, 2009, MGE has recorded $0.1 million in regulatory assets for these environmental costs.


In addition, MGE has been allowed to defer actual costs plus carrying costs on certain Columbia environmental expenditures. As of December 31, 2009, MGE has recorded $0.7 million in regulatory assets related to these costs. The pre-construction portion of the costs will be transferred to construction work in progress once a Certificate of Authority is received from the PSCW. MGE expects recovery of these costs over the life of the installed equipment.


Regulatory Asset (Liability) - Derivatives

MGE has physical and financial contracts that are defined as derivatives. The amounts recorded for the net mark-to-market value of the commodity based contracts is offset with a corresponding regulatory asset or liability because these transactions are part of the PGA or fuel rules clause authorized by the PSCW.


Tax Recovery Related to AFUDC Equity

AFUDC equity represents the after-tax equity cost associated with utility plant construction and results in a temporary difference between the book and tax basis of such plant. It is probable under PSCW regulation that MGE will recover in future rates the future increase in taxes payable represented by the deferred income tax liability. The amounts will be recovered in rates over the depreciable life of the asset for which AFUDC was applied. Tax recovery related to AFUDC equity represents the revenue requirement related to recovery of these future taxes payable, calculated at current statutory tax rates.


Asset Retirement Obligation

See Footnote 20 for further discussion.


Unfunded Pension and Other Postretirement Liability

MGE is required to recognize the unfunded status of defined benefit pension and other postretirement pension plans as a net liability or asset on the balance sheet with an offset to other comprehensive income. The amount normally charged to other comprehensive income for the unfunded status represents future expenses that are expected to be recovered in rates. Accordingly, MGE has recorded such adjustments as a regulatory asset.


Debt Related Costs

This balance includes debt issuance costs of extinguished debt and other debt related expenses. The PSCW has allowed rate recovery on unamortized issuance costs for extinguished debt facilities. When the facility replacing the old facility is deemed by the PSCW to be more favorable for the ratepayers, the PSCW will allow rate recovery of any unamortized issuance costs related to the old facility. These amounts are recovered over the term of the new facility and are classified as regulatory assets within the consolidated financial statements.


Other debt related expenses include deferred charges related to the 2027A Series debt. That incremental difference between interest earned and interest expensed during construction is currently being amortized over the remaining life of the bonds as part of the rate recovery allowed by the PSCW.


Regulatory Assets - Elm Road

MGE has deferred payments made to MGE Power Elm Road for carrying costs during construction of the facility, management fees, community impact mitigation, and transition costs. MGE is collecting carrying costs in rates over a six year period beginning in 2010. All other costs are collected in rates over a one to two year period.




80




Blount Restructuring Costs

On January 19, 2006, MGE announced a plan, subject to certain conditions, that includes discontinuing coal use at Blount. The plan also included reducing the capacity at Blount from 190 MW to 100 MW. MGE will need to keep Blount available at full capacity until MISO declares that the 90 MW are no longer needed for system reliability which is currently anticipated in June 2013. MGE has determined certain employee positions will be eliminated as a result of this exit plan. Accordingly, this plan has resulted in certain involuntary and voluntary severance benefits and retention bonus payments. Recovery of these amounts began in 2008 and will continue through 2013. Costs will be recovered in rates in the year cash payments are expected to be made. In January 2010, MGE announced it will change its primary fuel at Blount from coal to natural gas. Coal will become the secondary fuel at Blount. This switch to natural gas as a primary fuel will occur in March 2010. See footnote 19 for further discussion related to this plan.


Pension and OPRB Costs

The PSCW has allowed MGE to defer the 2009 incremental pension and OPRB costs above the amounts recovered in rates. Recovery of the costs began in 2010. The costs are being recovered in rates over a four year period for electric portion and a two year period for gas portion.


Conservation Costs

MGE has received regulatory treatment for certain conservation expenditures. The expenditures are used for demand-side management programs to promote energy efficiency on the customer's premises. Costs for demand-side management programs are estimated in MGE's rates utilizing escrow accounting. The escrow accounting allows the utility to true-up its actual costs incurred and reflect the amount of the true-up in its next rate case filing and amortize the amount over the rate case period.


Regulatory Liability – Income Taxes

Excess deferred income taxes result from past taxes provided at rates higher than current rates. The regulatory liability and deferred investment tax credit reflects the revenue requirement associated with the return of these tax benefits to customers.


Regulatory Liability - Medicare Subsidy

This amount relates to the difference in treatment of the Medicare Part D Subsidy for tax and book purposes. For income tax purposes, the benefit of this subsidy is excluded from the computation of the unfunded liability. However, for financial statement purposes, the unfunded liability includes (or is reduced by) the benefit of the Medicare Part D Subsidy. Such tax benefits will be returned to customers in rates in future periods.


Non-ARO Removal Costs

In connection with accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, companies are required to reclassify cumulative collections for non-ARO removal costs as a regulatory liability, with an offsetting entry to accumulated depreciation. Under the current rate structure, these removal costs are being recovered as a component of depreciation expense.


Regulatory Liability - Customer Fuel Credit

See Footnote 17 for further discussion.


Renewable Energy Credits

MGE receives renewable energy credits from certain purchase power agreements and from its own renewable generation. The value of the credits are recorded as inventory and expensed when the credit is redeemed or expired. A regulatory liability has been established for the value of its renewable energy credits included in inventory. In Wisconsin, renewable energy credits expire four years after the year of acquisition. This benefit will be returned to customers in the year the credit is redeemed or expired.


7.

Common Equity.


a.

Common Stock - MGE Energy and MGE.


MGE Energy sells shares of its common stock through its Stock Plan. Those shares may be newly issued shares or shares that MGE Energy has purchased in the open market for resale to participants in the Stock Plan. All sales are covered by a shelf registration statement that MGE Energy filed with the SEC. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, MGE Energy issued 209,065 and 954,238 new shares of common stock under the Stock Plan for net proceeds of $6.3 million and $31.0 million, respectively.



81




In June 2009, MGE Energy switched from issuing new shares of common stock under the Stock Plan to purchasing shares on the open market to provide shares to meet obligations to participants in the Stock Plan. The shares are purchased on the open market through a securities broker-dealer and then are reissued under the Stock Plan as needed to meet share delivery requirements. The volume and timing of share repurchases in the open market depends upon the level of dividend reinvestment and optional share purchases being made from time to time by plan participants. As a result, there is no specific maximum number of shares to be repurchased and no specified termination date for the repurchases.


During the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, MGE Energy paid $33.7 million (or $1.46 per share) and $31.8 million (or $1.43 per share), respectively, in cash dividends on its common stock. Dividends on common stock at MGE are subject to restrictions imposed by the PSCW and the covenants of MGE's outstanding first mortgage bonds. See Footnote 9 for further discussion of these covenants. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, MGE paid $19.3 million in cash dividends to MGE Energy. No cash dividends were paid from MGE to MGE Energy for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008.


b.

Preferred Stock - MGE Energy and MGE.


MGE has 1,175,000 shares of $25 par value redeemable preferred stock (cumulative) that is authorized but unissued at December 31, 2009 and 2008.


c.

Dilutive Shares Calculation - MGE Energy.


MGE Energy does not hold any dilutive securities.


8.

Noncontrolling Interest - MGE.


a.

MGE Power West Campus.


MGE Power West Campus is not a subsidiary of MGE; however, it has been consolidated in the consolidated financial statements of MGE (see Footnote 2). MGE Power West Campus is 100% owned by MGE Power and MGE Power is 100% owned by MGE Energy. MGE Energy's proportionate share of the equity and net income (through its wholly owned subsidiary MGE Power) of MGE Power West Campus is classified within the MGE financial statements as noncontrolling interest. Noncontrolling interest on the balance sheet related to MGE Power West Campus at December 31, 2009 and 2008, is $29.0 million and $32.3 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, MGE Power had earned $7.6 million, $7.6 million, and $7.7 million, net of tax, from its interest in MGE Power West Campus, respectively. This amount is recorded as noncontrolling interest expense, net of tax, on MGE's consolidated statement of income.


b.

MGE Transco.


At December 31, 2009, MGE is the majority owner, and MGE Energy is the minority owner, of MGE Transco. MGE Energy's proportionate share of the equity and net income of MGE Transco is classified within the MGE financial statements as noncontrolling interest. Noncontrolling interest on the balance sheet related to MGE Transco at December 31, 2009 and 2008, is $9.8 million and $6.6 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, MGE Energy had earned $1.5 million, $0.8 million, and $0.5 million, net of tax, from its interest in MGE Transco, respectively. These amounts are recorded as noncontrolling interest expense, net of tax, on MGE's consolidated statement of income.


c.

MGE Power Elm Road.


Similar to MGE Power West Campus, MGE Power Elm Road is not a subsidiary of MGE; however, it has been consolidated in the consolidated financial statements of MGE (see Footnote 2). MGE Power Elm Road is 100% owned by MGE Power and MGE Power is 100% owned by MGE Energy. MGE Energy's proportionate share of the equity and net income (through its wholly owned subsidiary MGE Power) of MGE Power Elm Road is classified within the MGE financial statements as noncontrolling interest. Noncontrolling interest on the balance sheet related to MGE Power Elm Road at December 31, 2009 and 2008, is $140.2 million and $135.3 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, MGE Power recognized earnings of $4.9 million, $3.9 million, and $2.6 million, net of tax, from its interest in MGE Power Elm Road, respectively. These amounts are recorded as noncontrolling interest expense, net of tax, on MGE's consolidated statement of income.



82




9.

Long-Term Debt.


a.

First Mortgage Bonds - MGE Energy and MGE.


MGE's utility plant is subject to the lien of its Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust, under which its first mortgage bonds are issued.


The Mortgage Indenture restricts the payment by MGE of dividends or any other distribution or purchase of shares to the existing earned surplus (retained earnings) on MGE common stock. MGE's earned surplus exceeded all such payments for all years covered under this report.


b.

Medium-Term Notes – MGE Energy and MGE.


The indenture under which MGE's medium-term notes are issued provides that those notes will be entitled to be equally and ratably secured in the event that MGE issues any additional first mortgage bonds.


c.

Other Senior Notes - MGE Energy and MGE.


On September 11, 2008, MGE issued $40 million of unsecured 5.59% senior notes due September 11, 2018, pursuant to a Note Purchase Agreement. Under that Note Purchase Agreement: (i) note holders have the right to require MGE to repurchase their notes at par in the event of an acquisition of beneficial ownership of 30% or more of the outstanding voting stock of MGE Energy, (ii) MGE must maintain a ratio of its consolidated indebtedness to consolidated total capitalization not to exceed a maximum of 65% and (iii) MGE cannot issue "Priority Debt" in an amount exceeding 20% of its consolidated assets. Priority Debt is defined as any indebtedness of MGE secured by liens other than specified liens permitted by the Note Purchase Agreement and certain unsecured indebtedness of certain subsidiaries.


On September 30, 2003 and October 27, 2005, MGE Power West Campus issued $30 million of 5.68% senior secured notes and $20 million of 5.19% senior secured notes, respectively, that require it to maintain a projected debt service coverage ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1.00, and debt to total capitalization ratio of not more than .65 to 1.00. The notes are secured by a collateral assignment of lease payments that MGE is making to MGE Power West Campus for use of its ownership interest in a cogeneration facility pursuant to a long-term lease.


d.

Long-Term Debt Maturities - MGE Energy and MGE.


Below is MGE Energy's and MGE's aggregate maturities for all long-term debt for years following the December 31, 2009, balance sheet.


(In thousands)

MGE Energy**

 

MGE

2010

$ 1,528


$-

2011

1,667


-

2012

35,967


34,300

2013

2,014


347

2014

3,102


1,435

Future years*

279,222


237,418

Total*

$323,500


$273,500


*Includes $30 million and $20 million maturity for MGE Power West Campus, which is consolidated with MGE's debt (see Footnote 2).


**Includes $50 million of MGE Power Elm Road 5.04% senior secured notes, due 2040, issued on February 4, 2010. The proceeds of this issuance were used to repay short-term debt.


MGE has $15 million of 6.58% medium-term notes due in 2012 and $19.3 million of 4.875% Industrial Development Revenue Bonds which have a mandatory repurchase on April 1, 2012 but have a maturity date of October 1, 2027.




83




10.

Notes Payable to Banks, Commercial Paper, and Lines of Credit - MGE Energy and MGE.


a.

MGE Energy.


At December 31, 2009, MGE Energy had two unsecured, committed revolving lines of credit, one for $80 million expiring December 21, 2010 and the second for $40 million expiring August 27, 2010. At December 31, 2009, $80 million and $1.0 million in borrowings, respectively, were outstanding under these facilities.


The agreements require MGE Energy to maintain a ratio of its consolidated indebtedness to consolidated total capitalization not to exceed a maximum of 65%. A change in control constitutes a default under the agreements. Change in control events are defined as (i) a failure by MGE Energy to hold 100% of the outstanding voting equity interest in MGE or (ii) the acquisition of beneficial ownership of 30% or more of the outstanding voting stock of MGE Energy by one person or two or more persons acting in concert.


b.

MGE.


For short-term borrowings, MGE generally issues commercial paper (issued at the prevailing discount rate at the time of issuance), which is supported by unused committed bank lines of credit. At December 31, 2009, MGE had two unsecured, committed revolving lines of credit, one for $55 million expiring December 21, 2010 and one for $20 million expiring March 30, 2010. At December 31, 2009, no borrowings were outstanding on either facility; however, there was $33.5 million in commercial paper outstanding.


The agreements require MGE to maintain a ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated total capitalization not to exceed a maximum of 65%. The ratio calculation excludes assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses included in MGE's financial statements as the result of the consolidation of VIEs, such as MGE Power West Campus and MGE Power Elm Road. A change in control constitutes a default under the agreements. Change in control events are defined as (i) a failure by MGE Energy to hold 100% of the outstanding voting equity interest in MGE or (ii) the acquisition of beneficial ownership of 30% or more of the outstanding voting stock of MGE Energy by one person or two or more persons acting in concert.


c.

MGE Energy and MGE.


Information concerning short-term borrowings for the past three years is shown below:


 

As of December 31,

(In thousands)

2009

 

2008

 

2007

MGE Energy

 

 

 

 

 

Available lines of credit

$195,000

 

$195,000

 

$155,000

Short-term debt outstanding

$64,500

 

$124,500

 

$103,500

Weighted-average interest rate

0.53%*

 

1.31%

 

4.71%

During the year:


 


 


Maximum short-term borrowings

$134,000

 

$139,000

 

$108,500

Average short-term borrowings

$105,015*

 

$110,803

 

$59,113

Weighted-average interest rate

0.63%*

 

2.88%

 

5.39%

 


 


 


MGE


 


 


Available lines of credit

$ 75,000

 

$75,000

 

$75,000

Commercial paper outstanding

 

$33,500

 

$51,000

 

$61,000

Weighted-average interest rate

0.20%

 

0.91%

 

4.47%

During the year:


 


 


Maximum short-term borrowings

$60,500

 

$64,000

 

$64,000

Average short-term borrowings

$26,900

 

$46,210

 

$27,954

Weighted-average interest rate

0.31%

 

2.44%

 

5.08%


*Includes $50 million of short term debt classified as long term debt due to the MGE Power Elm Road 5.04% senior secured notes, issued on February 4, 2010, the proceeds of which were used to repay short-term debt.




84




11.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments - MGE Energy and MGE.


a.

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities Recorded at the Carrying Amount.


At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the carrying amount of cash, cash equivalents, and outstanding commercial paper approximates fair market value due to the short maturity of those investments and obligations. The estimated fair market value of MGE Energy's and MGE long-term debt is based on quoted market prices at December 31. The estimated fair market value of MGE Energy's and MGE's financial instruments are as follows:


 

2009

 

2008

(In thousands)

Carrying

Amount

 

Fair

Value

 

Carrying

Amount

 

Fair

Value

MGE Energy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$4,704

 

$4,704

 

$4,106

 

$4,106

Liabilities:


 


 


 


Short-term debt - bank loans

31,000

 

31,000

 

73,500

 

73,500

Short-term debt - commercial paper

33,500

 

33,500

 

51,000

 

51,000

Long-term debt*

323,500

 

339,557

 

273,500

 

261,315

 


 


 


 


MGE


 


 


 


Assets:


 


 


 


Cash and cash equivalents

2,474

 

2,474

 

1,318

 

1,318

Liabilities:


 


 


 


Short-term debt - commercial paper

33,500

 

33,500

 

51,000

 

51,000

Long-term debt*

273,500

 

289,557

 

273,500

 

261,315


*Includes long-term debt due within one year.


b.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements.


Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The standard clarifies that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability including assumptions about risk. The standard also establishes a three level fair value hierarchy based upon the observability of the assumptions used and requires the use of observable market data when available. The levels are:


Level 1 - Pricing inputs are quoted prices within active markets for identical assets or liabilities.


Level 2 - Pricing inputs are quoted prices within active markets for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations that are correlated with or otherwise verifiable by observable market data.


Level 3 - Pricing inputs are unobservable and reflect management's best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.




85




The following table presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for MGE Energy and MGE.


(In thousands)

Fair Value as of December 31, 2009

 

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

MGE Energy





Assets:





Exchange-traded investments

$535

$535

$-

$-

Total Assets

$535

$535

$-

$-

Liabilities:





Derivatives, net (a)

$12,541

$(506)

$-

$13,047

Deferred compensation

1,342

1,342

-

-

Total Liabilities

$13,883

$836

$-

$13,047

 

 

 



MGE

 

 



Assets:





Exchange-traded investments

$327

$327

$-

$-

Total Assets

$327

$327

$-

$-

Liabilities:





Derivatives, net (a)

$12,541

$(506)

$-

$13,047

Deferred compensation

1,342

1,342

-

-

Total Liabilities

$13,883

$836

$-

$13,047


(a)

These amounts are shown gross and exclude $0.4 million of collateral that was posted against derivative positions with counterparties.


(In thousands)

Fair Value as of December 31, 2008

 

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

MGE Energy





Assets:





Exchange-traded investments

$511

$511

$-

$-

Total Assets

$511

$511

$-

$-

Liabilities:





Derivatives, net (b)

$14,007

$4,788

$-

$9,219

Deferred compensation

1,171

1,171

-

-

Total Liabilities

$ 15,178

$5,959

$-

$9,219

 

 

 



MGE

 

 



Assets:





Exchange-traded investments

$364

$364

$-

$-

Total Assets

$364

$364

$-

$-

Liabilities:





Derivatives, net (b)

$14,007

$4,788

$-

$9,219

Deferred compensation

1,171

1,171

-

-

Total Liabilities

$15,178

$5,959

$-

$9,219


(b)

These amounts are shown gross and exclude $9.9 million of collateral that was posted against derivative positions with counterparties.


Investments include exchange-traded investment securities valued using quoted prices on active exchanges and are therefore classified as Level 1.



86





Derivatives include exchange-traded derivative contracts, over-the-counter party transactions, a ten-year purchased power agreement, and FTRs. Most exchange-traded derivative contracts are valued based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets and are therefore classified as Level 1. A small number of exchange-traded derivative contracts are valued using quoted market pricing in markets with insufficient volumes and are therefore classified as Level 3. Transactions done with an over-the-counter party are on inactive markets and are therefore classified as Level 3. These transactions are valued based on quoted prices with markets with similar exchange traded transactions. The ten-year purchased power agreement (see Footnote 16) was valued using an internally-developed pricing model and therefore classified as Level 3. The model includes both observable and unobservable inputs. Inputs to the model require significant management judgment and estimation. The model uses a forward power pricing curve based on exchange-traded contracts in the electric futures market. As described above, the market prices from this source have insufficient volumes and are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. To project future prices beyond the period in which these quoted market prices are available, MGE calculates the price based on forward gas prices and an implied heat rate. MGE considers the assumptions that market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability. This consideration includes assumptions about market risk such as liquidity, volatility and contract duration. The fair value model incorporates discounting, credit, and model risks. FTRs are priced based upon monthly auction results for identical or similar instruments in a closed market with limited data available and are therefore classified as Level 3.


Cash and cash equivalents include investments with maturities of less than three months that are traded in active markets and deposit accounts, and are therefore classified as Level 1.


The deferred compensation plan allows participants to defer certain cash compensation into a notional investment account. These amounts are included within other deferred liabilities in the balance sheets of MGE Energy and MGE. The notional investments earn interest based upon the semiannual rate of U.S. Treasury Bills having a 26 week maturity increased by 1% compounded monthly, with a minimum annual rate of 7%, compounded monthly, and are therefore based upon observable market data and classified as Level 1.


The following table summarizes the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for both MGE Energy and MGE.


(In thousands)

 

 

Twelve Months Ended December 31,

2009

2008

Balance as of January 1,

$(9,219)

$(444)

Realized and unrealized gains (losses):



Included in regulatory liabilities (assets)

(3,829)

(8,801)

Included in other comprehensive income

-

26

Included in earnings

(14,489)

21

Included in current assets

(24)

-

Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements, net

14,514

(21)

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3

-

-

Balance as of December 31,

$(13,047)

$(9,219)

Total gains (losses) included in earnings attributed to the change in unrealized gains (losses) related to assets and liabilities held at December 31, (c)  

$-



$-




87




The following table presents total realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in income for Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, for both MGE Energy and MGE. (c).


(In thousands)

Purchased

Power Expense

Cost of Gas Sold

Expense

Regulated Gas

Revenues

Total gains (losses) included in earnings for the

twelve months ended December 31, 2009

$(14,642)

$82

$71

Total gains (losses) included in earnings for the

twelve months ended December 31, 2008

$139

$(59)

$(59)


(c) MGE's exchange-traded derivative contracts, over-the-counter party transactions, ten-year purchased power agreement, and FTRs are subject to regulatory deferral. These derivatives are therefore marked to fair value and are offset with a corresponding regulatory asset or liability. A portion of MGE's derivative contracts fall under the incentive mechanism within the PGA clause and shareholders have the ability to receive a set percentage of the benefit or loss from these deals if certain thresholds are achieved. Under these derivatives, only the gains or losses associated with customers are subject to regulatory deferral. The remaining shareholder portion is reflected in other comprehensive income. As a result of the above described treatment, there are no unrealized gains or losses that flow through earnings.


12.

Income Taxes.


a.

MGE Energy Income Taxes.


MGE Energy files a consolidated federal income tax return that includes the operations of all subsidiary companies. The consolidated income tax provision consists of the following provision (benefit) components for the years ended December 31:


(In thousands)

2009

 

2008

 

2007

Current payable:

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

$8,008

 

$15,764

 

$22,482

State

2,796

 

5,060

 

5,033

Net-deferred:


 


 


Federal

14,408

 

7,361

 

37

State

3,300

 

1,222

 

713

Amortized investment tax credits

(342)

 

(351)

 

(410)

Total income tax provision

$28,170

 

$29,056

 

$27,855


MGE Energy's consolidated income tax provision differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before income taxes, as follows:


 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

Statutory federal income tax rate

35.0%

 

35.0%

 

35.0%

State income taxes, net of federal benefit

5.1%

 

5.0%

 

4.8%

Amortized investment tax credits

(0.4)%

 

(0.4)%

 

(0.5)%

Credit for electricity from wind energy

(2.5)%

 

(2.4)%

 

(0.6)%

Domestic manufacturing deduction

(0.5)%

 

(0.5)%

 

(0.6)%

Other, net, individually insignificant

(1.1)%

 

(1.2)%

 

(1.8)%

Effective income tax rate

35.6%

 

35.5%

 

36.3%


Under 2009 Wisconsin Act 2, effective for years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, Wisconsin requires corporations to use combined reporting to compute their Wisconsin income for income tax purposes. Formerly, Wisconsin law required each corporation in a combined group to file separate returns. The combined reporting statute in Wisconsin did not have a significant impact on the effective income tax rates of MGE Energy and MGE.




88




The significant components of deferred tax liabilities (assets) that appear on MGE Energy's consolidated balance sheets as of December 31 are as follows:


(In thousands)

2009

 

2008

Property-related

$134,216

 

$116,492

Investment in ATC

20,216

 

16,003

Bond transactions

1,991

 

2,133

Pension expense

1,856

 

3,339

Unfunded pension and other postretirement liability

37,422

 

38,547

Derivatives

5,188

 

5,702

Tax deductible prepayments

7,235

 

6,743

Other

14,828

 

9,031

Gross deferred income tax liabilities

222,952

 

197,990

Accrued expenses

(23,697)

 

(18,242)

Retirement benefits, other than pension

(10,642)

 

(9,478)

Deferred tax regulatory account

(2,858)

 

(3,220)

Unfunded pension and other postretirement liability

(37,652)

 

(39,393)

Derivatives

(5,188)

 

(5,702)

Other

(3,428)

 

(1,510)

Gross deferred income tax assets

(83,465)

 

(77,545)

Less valuation allowance

365

 

366

Net deferred income tax assets

(83,100)

 

(77,179)

Deferred income taxes

$139,852

 

$120,811


The valuation allowance reduces MGE Energy's deferred tax assets for state carryforward losses to estimated realizable value due to the uncertainty of future income estimates in various state tax jurisdictions.


For tax purposes, as of December 31, 2009, MGE Energy had approximately $7.5 million of state tax net operating loss deductions that expire between 2011 to 2019 if unused.


b.

MGE Income Taxes.


MGE Energy files a consolidated federal income tax return. The subsidiaries calculate their respective federal income tax provisions as if they were separate taxable entities.


On a separate company basis, the components of MGE's income tax provision are as follows for the years ended December 31:


(In thousands)

2009

 

2008

 

2007

Current payable:

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

$8,292

 

$14,313

 

$21,899

State

2,855

 

4,710

 

4,882

Net-deferred:


 


 


Federal

13,441

 

7,255

 

11

State

3,065

 

1,199

 

703

Amortized investment tax credits

(342)

 

(351)

 

(410)

Total income tax provision

$27,311

 

$27,126

 

$27,085


MGE's income tax provision on a separate company basis differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before noncontrolling interest and income tax provision as follows:

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

Statutory federal income tax rate

35.0%

 

35.0%

 

35.0%

State income taxes, net of federal benefit

5.1%

 

5.0%

 

4.7%

Amortized investment tax credits

(0.4)%

 

(0.5)%

 

(0.5)%

Credit for electricity from wind energy

(2.6)%

 

(2.5)%

 

(0.6)%

Domestic manufacturing deduction

(0.5)%

 

(0.5)%

 

(0.6)%

Other, net, individually insignificant

(1.2)%

 

(1.3)%

 

(1.8)%

Net Effective income tax rate

35.4%

 

35.2%

 

36.2%




89




The significant components of deferred tax liabilities (assets) that appear on MGE's consolidated balance sheets as of December 31 are as follows:


(In thousands)

2009

 

2008

Property-related

$134,216

 

$116,492

Investment in ATC

20,216

 

16,003

Bond transactions

1,991

 

2,133

Pension expense

1,856

 

3,339

Unfunded pension and other postretirement liability

37,422

 

38,547

Derivatives

5,188

 

5,702

Tax deductible prepayments

7,235

 

6,743

Other

12,995

 

8,780

Gross deferred income tax liabilities

221,119

 

197,739

Accrued expenses

(23,229)

 

(18,116)

Retirement benefits, other than pension

(10,642)

 

(9,478)

Deferred tax regulatory account

(2,858)

 

(3,220)

Unfunded pension and other postretirement liability

(37,652)

 

(39,393)

Derivatives

(5,188)

 

(5,702)

Other

(3,427)

 

(1,522)

Gross deferred income tax assets

(82,996)

 

(77,431)

Less valuation allowance

365

 

366

Net deferred income tax assets

(82,631)

 

(77,065)

Deferred income taxes

$138,488

 

$120,674


The valuation allowance reduces MGE's deferred tax assets for state carryforward losses to estimated realizable value due to the uncertainty of future income estimates in various state tax jurisdictions.


For tax purposes, as of December 31, 2009, MGE had approximately $7.5 million of state tax net operating loss deductions that expire between 2011 to 2019 if unused.


c.

Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - MGE Energy and MGE.


MGE Energy and MGE account for the difference between the tax benefit amount taken on prior year tax returns, or expected to be taken on a current year tax return, and the tax benefit amount recognized in the financial statements as an unrecognized tax benefit.


A tabular reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits and interest from January 1, 2007 (date of adoption) to December 31, 2009, is as follows:


(In thousands)

Tax

 

Interest

Amounts of unrecognized tax benefits, January 1, 2007, upon adoption (Amounts are for years prior to 2007)

$277

 

$99

Settlements with taxing authorities paid in 2007

(186)

 

(24)

Reductions to beginning balance of unrecognized tax benefits as a result of settlements with taxing authorities

(91)

 

(75)

Additions based on tax positions related to 2007

99

 

-

Unrecognized tax benefits and accrued interest,

December 31, 2007

99

 

-

Additions based on tax positions related to 2008

77

 

-

Accrued interest on unrecognized tax benefits

 

-

 

9

Unrecognized tax benefits and accrued interest,

December 31, 2008

176

 

9

Additions based on tax positions related to 2009

 

-

 

-

Accrued interest on unrecognized tax benefits

 

-

 

12

Unrecognized tax benefits and accrued interest, December 31, 2009

 

$176

 

$21


Unrecognized tax benefits are liabilities shown with Other Deferred Liabilities on the December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, balance sheets.



90




Unrecognized tax benefits included in the December 31, 2009 and 2008 balance sheets relate mainly to federal permanent differences and tax credits, the realization of which would not significantly impact the effective tax rate. The unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2009, are not expected to significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months.


Prior to 2009, Wisconsin required each corporation within a consolidation group to file a separate tax return. Effective for tax years ending on or after January 1, 2009, Wisconsin mandates the use of combined reporting for unitary businesses. MGE Energy is a unitary business.


The following table shows tax years that remain subject to examination by major jurisdiction:


Taxpayer

Open Years

MGE Energy and consolidated subsidiaries in federal return

2006 through 2009

MGE Energy Wisconsin separate corporation return

2005 through 2008

MGE Wisconsin separate corporation return

2005 through 2008

MGE Energy Wisconsin combined reporting corporation return

2009


13.

Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits - MGE Energy and MGE.


MGE maintains qualified and nonqualified pension plans, health care and life insurance benefits, and two defined contribution 401(k) benefit plans for its employees and retirees. MGE's costs for the 401(k) plans were $1.3 million, $1.2 million, and $1.0 million in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. A measurement date of December 31 is utilized for all pension and postretirement benefit plans.


All employees hired after December 31, 2006, have been enrolled in the defined contribution pension plan, rather than the defined benefit pension plan previously in place.


a.

Benefit Obligations.


(In thousands)

Pension Benefits

 

Other

Postretirement

Benefits

Change in benefit obligation:

2009

 

2008

 

2009

 

2008

Net benefit obligation at beginning of year

$191,798

 

$176,938

 

$62,786

 

$59,331

Service cost

5,235

 

5,022

 

1,783

 

1,724

Interest cost

11,430

 

11,305

 

3,801

 

3,743

Plan participants' contributions

-

 

-

 

483

 

442

Plan amendments

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

Actuarial (gain) loss

6,864

 

4,904

 

(480)

 

(354)

Special termination benefits

-

 

11

 

-

 

-

Gross benefits paid

(6,547)

 

(6,382)

 

(2,376)

 

(2,233)

Less: federal subsidy on benefits paid

-

 

-

 

141

 

133

Benefit obligation at end of year

$208,780

 

$191,798

 

$66,138

 

$62,786


The accumulated benefit obligation for the defined benefit pension plans at the end of 2009 and 2008 was $180.1 million and $166.2 million, respectively.


 

Pension Benefits

 

Other

Post-retirement Benefits

Weighted-average assumptions used to

determine end of year benefit obligations:

2009

 

2008

 

2009

 

2008

Discount rate

5.87%

 

6.11%

 

5.92%

 

6.11%

Rate of compensation increase

4.58%

 

4.56%

 

N/A

 

N/A




91




The following table shows assumed health care cost trend rates at December 31:


 

2009

 

2008

Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year

7.5%

 

8%

Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline

(the ultimate trend rate)

5%

 

5%

Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate

2015

 

2015


The assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans.


The following table shows how an assumed 1% increase or 1% decrease in health care cost trends could impact postretirement benefits in 2009 dollars:


(In thousands)

1% Increase

 

1% Decrease

Effect on other postretirement benefit obligation

$9,076

 

$(7,447)


In 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 was signed into law authorizing Medicare to provide prescription drug benefits to retirees. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the subsidy due to MGE was $0.1 million.


b.

Plan Assets.


(In thousands)

Pension Benefits

 

Other

Postretirement

Benefits

Change in plan assets:

2009

 

2008

 

2009

 

2008

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

$103,086

 

$145,118

 

$13,406

 

$16,542

Actual return on plan assets

25,866

 

(40,774)

 

2,462

 

(3,931)

Employer contributions

11,466

 

5,124

 

3,363

 

2,586

Plan participants' contributions

-

 

-

 

483

 

442

Gross benefits paid

(6,547)

 

(6,382)

 

(2,376)

 

(2,233)

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

$133,871

 

$103,086

 

$17,338

 

$13,406


The expected long-term rate of return on the pension plan assets reduced to 8.5% for 2009 and beyond from 9.0% in 2008.


c.

Explanation of Long-Term Rate of Return.


MGE employs a building-block approach in determining the expected long-term rate of return for asset classes. Historical markets are studied and long-term historical relationships among asset classes are analyzed, consistent with the widely accepted capital market principle that assets with higher volatility generate a greater return over the long run. Current market factors such as interest rates and dividend yields are evaluated before long-term capital market assumptions are determined.


The expected long-term nominal rate of return for plan assets is primarily a function of expected long-term real rates of return for component asset classes and the plan's target asset allocation in conjunction with an inflation assumption. Peer data and historical returns are reviewed to check for appropriateness.


The asset allocation for MGE's pension plans at the end of 2009 and 2008, and the target allocation for 2010, by asset category, follows:


 

Target

Allocation

 

Percentage of Plan Assets at Year End

 

 

2009

 

2008

Equity securities

63.0%

 

66.0%

 

72.0%

Debt securities

30.0%

 

27.0%

 

14.7%

Real estate

7.0%

 

7.0%

 

13.3%

Total

100.0%

 

100.0%

 

100.0%




92




d.

Investment Strategy.


MGE employs a total return investment approach whereby a mix of equities, fixed income, and real estate investments are used to maximize the expected long-term return of plan assets for a prudent level of risk. Risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of plan liabilities, plan-funded status, and corporate financial condition. The investment portfolio contains a diversified blend of equity, fixed income, and real estate investments. Target asset allocations are as follows: 45.5% United States equity, 17.5% non-United States equity, 30% fixed income, and 7% real estate. Investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through periodic investment portfolio reviews and liability measurements.


e.

Concentrations of Credit Risk.


MGE evaluated its pension and other postretirement benefit plans' asset portfolios for the existence of significant concentrations of credit risk as of December 31, 2009. Types of concentrations that were evaluated include, but are not limited to, investment concentrations in a single entity, type of industry, and foreign country. As of December 31, 2009, there were no significant concentrations (defined as greater than 10 percent of plan assets) of risk in MGE pension and postretirement benefit plan assets.


f.

Fair Value Measurements of Plan Assets.


Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The standard clarifies that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability including assumptions about risk. The standard also establishes a three level fair value hierarchy based upon the observability of the assumptions used and requires the use of observable market data when available. The levels are:


Level 1 - Pricing inputs are quoted prices within active markets for identical assets or liabilities.


Level 2 - Pricing inputs are quoted prices within active markets for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations that are correlated with or otherwise verifiable by observable market data.


Level 3 - Pricing inputs are unobservable and reflect management's best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.


The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value as of December 31, 2009:


Cash and Cash Equivalents – This includes highly liquid investments with maturities of less than 3 months which are traded in active markets.


Equity Securities – These U.S. Stock Funds are primarily invested in domestic equities. Securities in these funds are typically priced using the closing price from the applicable exchange, NYSE, NASDAQ, etc. The International Funds are composed of international equities. Securities are priced using the closing price from the appropriate local stock exchange.


Fixed Income Securities – These securities consist of U.S. Bond Funds and Short-Term Funds. U.S. Bond Funds are priced by Interactive Data (a pricing agent) using inputs such as benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, and issuer spreads. The Short-Term Funds are valued initially at cost and adjusted for amortization of any discount or premium.


Real Estate – The fair value of real estate properties is determined through an external appraisal process.


Insurance Continuance Fund (ICF) – The fair value of the ICF is based on largely unobservable inputs which are based on a commingled interest.




93




The Fair Value of MGE's plan assets at December 31, 2009, by asset category are as follows:


(In thousands)

Fair Value as of December 31, 2009

 

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

MGE Energy





Cash and Cash Equivalents

$2,036

$2,036

$-

$-

Equity Securities:





U.S. Large Cap

44,633

-

44,633

-

U.S. Mid Cap

11,051

-

11,051

-

U.S. Small Cap

14,424

-

14,424

-

International Blend

27,810

-

27,810

-

Fixed Income Securities:





Short-Term Fund

1,169

-

1,169

-

High Yield Bond

7,557

-

7,557

-

Long Duration Bond

31,311

-

31,311

-

Real Estate

10,210

-

-

10,210

Insurance Continuance Fund

1,008

-

-

1,008

Total

$151,209

$2,036

$137,955

$11,218

 

 

 




The following table summarizes the changes in the fair value of the Level 3 plan assets for the year ended December 31, 2009.


(In thousands)

Level 3 Assets

 

Real Estate

Insurance Continuance Fund

MGE Energy



Balances, January 1, 2009

$15,098

$1,078

Realized gains/(losses)

(9)

-

Unrealized gains/(losses) relating to instruments still

held at December 31, 2009

(5,153)

-

Other Income

335

52

Purchases, sales, issuance and settlements, net

(61)

(122)

Balance, December 31, 2009

$10,210

$1,008


g.

Other Postretirement Benefits.


The fair value of plan assets for these postretirement benefit plans is $17.3 million and $13.4 million at the end of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The expected long-term rate of return on these plan assets was 7.39% and 7.11% in 2009 and 2008.


Of the above amounts, $13.4 million and $10.3 million at the end of 2009 and 2008, respectively, were held in the master pension trust and are allocable to postretirement health expenses. The target asset allocation and investment strategy for the portion of assets held in the master pension trust are the same as that explained for MGE's pension plans.


The remainder of postretirement benefit assets are held either in an insurance continuance fund for the payment of retiree life benefits or a health benefit trust for payment of retiree health claims. There is no formal target asset allocation for these assets, but the intent is to seek interest income and maintain stability of principal.




94




h.

Funded Status.


The funded status at the end of the year, and the related amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheet are as follows:


(In thousands)

Pension Benefits

 

Other

Postretirement

Benefits

Funded status, end of year

2009

 

2008

 

2009

 

2008

Fair value of plan assets

$133,871

 

$103,086

 

$17,338

 

$13,406

Benefit obligations

208,780

 

191,798

 

66,138

 

62,786

Funded status

$(74,909)

 

$(88,712)

 

$(48,800)

 

$(49,380)


At December 31, 2009, MGE Energy and MGE included a $0.8 million current liability, a $122.9 million long-term liability, and a $76.8 million regulatory asset in the balance sheet to properly reflect the unfunded status of the plans.


At December 31, 2008, MGE Energy and MGE included a $0.8 million current liability, a $137.3 million long-term liability, and a $95.2 million regulatory asset in the balance sheet to properly reflect the unfunded status of the plans.


(In thousands)

Pension

Benefits

 

Other

Postretirement

Benefits

Amounts recognized as regulatory asset

2009

 

2009

Net actuarial loss

$60,739

 

$11,605

Prior service cost

2,317

 

860

Transition obligation

-

 

1,317

Total

$63,056

 

$13,782


The projected benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with a projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets at December 31, 2009 and 2008, were as follows:


(In thousands)

Pension Benefits

Projected Benefit Obligation in Excess of Plan Assets

2009

 

2008

Projected benefit obligation, end of year

$208,780

 

$191,798

Fair value of plan assets, end of year

$133,871

 

$103,086


The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets at December 31, 2009 and 2008, were as follows:


(In thousands)

Pension Benefits

Accumulated Benefit Obligation in Excess of Plan Assets

2009

 

2008

Projected benefit obligation, end of year

$ 208,780

 

$191,798

Accumulated benefit obligation, end of year

180,058

 

166,232

Fair value of plan assets, end of year

133,871

 

103,086


i.

Expected Cash Flows.


Contributions to the plans for 2010 through 2014 are expected to be between 11.0 million to $13.0 million each year. The contributions for years after 2014 are currently not yet estimated. MGE has adopted the asset smoothing as permitted in accordance with the Pension Protection Act of 2006, including modifications made by WRERA.


Due to uncertainties in the future economic performance of plan assets, discount rates, and other key assumptions, estimated contributions are subject to change. MGE may also elect to make additional discretionary contributions.




95




In 2009, MGE made $15.3 million in employer contributions to its pension and postretirement plans related to the 2008 and 2009 plan years.


j.

Benefit Payments.


The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid as follows:


 

Pension

 

Other Postretirement



(In thousands)

Pension

Benefits

 

Gross

Postretirement

Benefits

 

Expected

Medicare Part D

Subsidy

 

Net

Postretirement

Benefits

2010

$8,134

 

$2,568

 

$(185)

 

$2,383

2011

8,805

 

2,865

 

(206)

 

2,659

2012

9,601

 

3,018

 

(241)

 

2,777

2013

10,392

 

3,391

 

(269)

 

3,122

2014

11,164

 

3,706

 

(296)

 

3,410

2015-2019

69,332

 

23,298

 

(2,023)

 

21,275


k.

Net Periodic Cost.


MGE has elected to recognize the cost of its transition obligation (the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation as of January 1, 1993) by amortizing it on a straight-line basis over 20 years.


(In thousands)

Pension Benefits

 

Other Postretirement Benefits

Components of net periodic benefit cost:

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

Service cost

$5,235

 

$5,022

 

$5,165

 

$1,783

 

$1,724

 

$1,618

Interest cost

11,430

 

11,305

 

10,421

 

3,801

 

3,743

 

3,101

Expected return on assets

(9,016)

 

(13,189)

 

(12,248)

 

(1,005)

 

(1,280)

 

(1,148)

Amortization of:


 


 


 


 


 


Transition obligation

143

 

143

 

143

 

427

 

427

 

427

Prior service cost

440

 

440

 

440

 

130

 

287

 

208

Actuarial loss

4,748

 

572

 

804

 

581

 

295

 

232

Net periodic benefit cost

$12,980

 

$4,293

 

$4,725

 

$5,717

 

$5,196

 

$4,438

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average assumptions used to

determine net periodic cost:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

6.11%

 

6.24%

 

5.90%

 

6.11%

 

6.29%

 

5.97%

Expected return on plan assets

8.50%

 

9.00%

 

9.00%

 

7.11%

 

7.85%

 

7.78%

Rate of compensation increase

4.58%

 

4.55%

 

4.55%

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

N/A


Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A 1% change in the assumed health care cost trend rates would have had the following effect:


(In thousands)

1% Increase

 

1% Decrease

Effect on total service and interest cost components

$859

 

$(696)


The PSCW has allowed MGE to defer the 2009 incremental pension and OPRB costs above the amounts recovered in rates. As of December 31, 2009 there were $7.7 million in total pension and OPRB costs deferred.


14.

Share-Based Compensation - MGE Energy and MGE.


The MGE Energy Board approved a Performance Unit Plan on December 15, 2006. Under that plan, eligible participants may receive performance units that entitle the holder to receive a cash payment equal to the value of a designated number of shares of MGE Energy's common stock, plus dividend equivalent payments thereon, at the end of the set vesting period. Per the plan's provisions, these awards are subject to a prescribed vesting schedule and must be settled in cash. Accordingly, no new shares of common stock will be issued in connection with the plan.




96




On the grant date, MGE Energy and MGE measured the cost of the employee services received in exchange for the award based on current market value of MGE Energy common stock. The fair value of the awards has been subsequently re-measured at December 31, 2009, as required by applicable accounting standards. Changes in fair value as well as the original grant have been recognized as compensation cost. Since this amount will be re-measured throughout the vesting period, the compensation cost is subject to variability. These units are subject to either a four or five year graded vesting schedule.


Grant Date

MGE Energy

Units Granted

January 1, 2007

22,479

January 18, 2008

18,538

January 16, 2009

18,604

January 15, 2010

17,310


For nonretirement eligible employees, stock based compensation costs are accrued and recognized using the graded vesting method. Compensation cost for retirement eligible employees or employees that will become retirement eligible during the vesting schedule are recognized on an abridged horizon also using the graded vesting method.


During the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 and, 2008, 2007, MGE recorded $0.8 million, $0.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively, in compensation expense as a result of this plan. No forfeitures occurred during 2009. A forfeiture of less than $0.1 million, but no cash settlements, occurred during the twelve months ended December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2009, $0.9 million of these awards were vested.


15.

Regional Transmission Organizations - MGE Energy and MGE.


MISO is a FERC approved RTO that is required to provide real-time energy services and a market based mechanism for transmission congestion management. MISO maintains a bid-based energy market. MGE offers substantially all of its generation on the MISO market and purchases much of its load requirement from the MISO market in accordance with the MISO Tariff. In January 2009, MISO implemented and MGE began participating in the ancillary services market (ASM). The ASM is an extension of the existing energy market in which MISO assumes the responsibility of maintaining sufficient generation reserves. Previously, MGE was responsible for providing its own reserves. In the ASM, MISO will provide the reserves for MGE's load, and MGE may offer to sell reserves from its generating units. In addition to this market change, MISO took on various balance authority functions. In June 2009, MISO implemented and MGE began participating in the voluntary capacity auction. The voluntary capacity auction provides an optional monthly forum for buyers and sellers of aggregate planning resource credits to interact. Load serving entities may participate in the voluntary capacity auction to potentially obtain the necessary aggregate planning resource credits to meet their planning reserve margin requirement. Generator owners may participate to sell any excess aggregate planning resource credits that are not needed.


Additionally, MGE is a member of PJM. PJM is also an RTO. PJM is a neutral and independent party that coordinates and directs the operation of the region's transmission grid, administers a competitive wholesale electricity market, and plans regional transmission expansion improvements to maintain grid reliability and relieve congestion. MGE has one purchase power agreement, for a total of 50 MW, that is affected by this market.


MGE reports on a net basis transactions on the MISO and PJM markets in which it buys and sells power within the same hour to meet electric energy delivery requirements. This treatment resulted in a $74.4 million, $163.8 million, and $157.3 million reduction to sales for resale and purchased power expense for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.




97




16.

Derivative and Hedging Instruments - MGE Energy and MGE.


As part of its regular operations, MGE enters into contracts, including options, swaps, futures, forwards, and other contractual commitments, to manage its exposure to commodity prices and gas revenues. To the extent that these contracts are derivatives, MGE assesses whether or not the normal purchases or normal sales exclusion applies. For contracts to which this exclusion cannot be applied, MGE Energy and MGE recognize such derivatives in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value, with changes in the fair value of derivative instruments to be recorded in current earnings or deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), depending on whether a derivative is designated as, and is effective as, a hedge. The majority of MGE's derivative activities are conducted in accordance with its electric and gas risk management program, which is approved by the PSCW and limits the volume MGE can hedge with specific risk management strategies. The maximum length of time over which cash flows related to energy commodities can be hedged is two years. If the derivative qualifies for regulatory deferral, the derivatives are marked to fair value and are offset with a corresponding regulatory asset or liability. The deferred gain or loss is recognized in earnings in the delivery month applicable to the instrument. Gains and losses related to hedges qualifying for regulatory treatment are recoverable in gas rates through the PGA or in electric rates as a component of the fuel rules mechanism.


As of December 31, 2009, the gross notional volume of open derivatives is as follows:

 

Commodity derivative contracts

647,560 MWh

Commodity derivative contracts

6,530,000 Dth

FTRs

3,003 MW


MGE Energy and MGE offset fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim collateral (a receivable) or the obligation to return collateral (a payable) against fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under a master netting agreement. At December 31, 2009, MGE Energy and MGE had $0.4 million in collateral that was posted against the derivative positions with counterparties.


MGE purchases and sells exchange-traded and over-the-counter options, swaps, and future contracts. These arrangements are primarily entered into to help stabilize the price risk associated with gas or power purchases. These transactions are employed by both MGE's gas and electric segments. Additionally, as a result of the firm transmission agreements that MGE holds on transmission paths in the MISO and PJM markets, MGE holds FTRs. An FTR is a financial instrument that entitles the holder to a stream of revenues or charges based on the differences in hourly day-ahead energy prices between two points on the transmission grid. The fair values of these instruments are reflected as a regulatory asset/liability depending on whether they are in a net loss/gain position. Depending on the nature of the instrument, the gain or loss associated with these transactions will be reflected as cost of gas sold, fuel for electric generation, or purchased power expense in the delivery month applicable to the instrument. At December 31, 2009, the fair value of these financial instruments exceeded their cost basis by $0.3 million.


MGE enters into futures and basis swaps to take advantage of physical and financial arbitrage opportunities between supply basins and pricing spreads between future months' gas supply. Under the incentive mechanism within the PGA clause, MGE shareholders have the ability to receive a set percentage of the benefits or loss from these deals if certain thresholds are achieved. The portion related to the shareholders is reflected in other comprehensive income and the portion related to customers is reflected as a regulatory asset/liability depending on whether they are in a net loss/gain position. At December 31, 2009, the cost basis of these financial instruments exceeded their fair value by less than $0.1 million.


MGE has also entered into a ten-year purchased power agreement which provides MGE with firm capacity and energy during a base term from June 1, 2012, through May 31, 2022. The agreement also allows MGE the option to purchase power during a period of time preceding that base term as well as an option to extend the contract after the base term. The agreement is a derivative contract and is recognized at its fair value on the balance sheet. However, the derivative qualifies for regulatory deferral and is recognized with a corresponding regulatory asset or liability depending on whether the fair value is in a loss or gain position. The fair value of the contract at December 31, 2009, reflects a loss position of $12.8 million. The actual fuel cost will be recognized in purchased power expense in the month of purchase.




98




The following table summarizes the fair value of the derivative instruments on the balance sheet at December 31, 2009. All derivative instruments in this table are presented on a gross basis and are calculated prior to the netting of instruments with the same counterparty under a master netting agreement as well as the netting of collateral. For financial statement purposes, MGE Energy and MGE have netted instruments with the same counterparty under a master netting agreement as well as the netting of collateral.


 

Asset Derivatives

Liability Derivatives

(In thousands)

Balance Sheet Location

Fair Value

Balance Sheet Location

Fair Value

Commodity derivative contracts

Other current assets

$1,357

Other current liabilities

$1,728

Commodity derivative contracts

Other deferred charges

89

Other deferred liabilities

94

FTRs

Other current assets

649

Other current liabilities

-

Ten-year PPA

N/A

N/A

Other deferred liabilities

12,815


The following table summarizes the unrealized and realized losses related to the derivative instruments on the balance sheet at December 31, 2009, and the income statement for the year ended December 31, 2009 (a).

(In thousands)

Current and long-term regulatory asset

Other current assets

Year Ended December 31, 2009:

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2008

$14,007

$4,466

Change in unrealized loss

26,611

-

Realized loss reclassified to a deferred account

(13,581)

13,581

Realized loss reclassified to income statement

(14,495)

(16,713)

Balance at December 31, 2009

$12,542

$1,334


(In thousands)

Regulated

gas revenues

Fuel for electric

generation/

purchased power

Cost of

gas sold

Realized losses (gains):




Year Ended December 31, 2009:




Commodity derivative contracts

$84

$22,515

$8,609

FTRs

-

(24)

-

Ten-year PPA

-

-

-

 

(a)

MGE's commodity derivative contracts, FTRs, and ten-year PPA are subject to regulatory deferral. These derivatives are marked to fair value and are offset with a corresponding regulatory asset or liability. Realized gains and losses are deferred on the balance sheet and are recognized in earnings in the delivery month applicable to the instrument. As a result of the above described treatment, there are no unrealized gains or losses that flow through earnings.


The ten-year PPA has a provision that may require MGE to post collateral if MGE's debt rating falls below investment grade (i.e., below BBB-) once MGE begins purchasing energy under the contract in 2012. The amount of collateral that it may be required to post varies from $20.0 million to $40.0 million, depending on MGE's nominated capacity amount. Certain counterparties extend MGE a credit limit. If MGE exceeds these limits, the counterparties may require collateral to be posted. At December 31, 2009, certain counterparties are in a net liability of less than $0.1 million.


On September 26, 2007, MGE entered into a non-exchange traded HDD collar. This agreement extended from January 2008 until March 2008 and had a premium of $0.2 million. Actual heating degree days during the aforementioned period were 3,971 which exceeded the ceiling; therefore, MGE recorded a $1.5 million expense (includes the $0.2 million premium) on the collar in the first quarter of 2008.


Nonperformance of counterparties to the non-exchange traded derivatives could expose MGE to credit loss. However, MGE enters into transactions only with companies that meet or exceed strict credit guidelines, and it monitors these counterparties on an ongoing basis to mitigate nonperformance risk in its portfolio. As of December 31, 2009, no counterparties have defaulted.




99




17.

Rate Matters - MGE Energy and MGE.


a.

Rate proceedings.


In December 2009, the PSCW authorized MGE to increase 2010 rates for retail electric customers by 3.3% or $11.9 million, while gas rates decrease 0.74% or $1.5 million. The increase in retail electric rates is driven by costs for MGE's share of the Elm Road Units and transmission reliability enhancements. Pursuant to the provisions of this rate order, the fuel rules bandwidth effective January 1, 2010, will be plus or minus 2%. See below for further description of fuel rules. Authorized return on common stock equity was set at 10.4% based on a 55.3% utility common equity.


On December 18, 2008, under a limited reopener, the PSCW authorized MGE to decrease 2009 rates for retail electric customers by 0.74% or $2.7 million, while gas rates remain unchanged from 2008. The decrease in retail electric rates was driven by a decrease in fuel and purchased power costs, decrease in costs associated with the Elm Road Units costs and a decrease in ATC transmission costs. The PSCW also approved deferred accounting for incremental pension and other postretirement benefit costs above the levels currently included in rates.


On December 14, 2007, the PSCW authorized MGE to increase 2008 electric rates by 4.8% or $16.2 million and increase gas distribution rates by 2.8% or $7.8 million. The electric increase covered costs for MGE's new wind energy projects, statewide energy efficiency and renewable energy programs, transmission improvements by ATC, and accelerated costs to discontinue coal use at the Blount Station. In addition to funding the statewide energy programs, the natural gas rate increase covered costs for area gas construction projects needed to accommodate customer growth. Authorized return on common stock equity was set at 10.8% based on 57.4% utility common equity.


On December 22, 2006, the PSCW approved a limited scope rate case reopener related to MGE's 2007 electric rates. This order approved an update to MGE's electric fuel costs monitored under the fuel rules, an updated estimate of the 2007 Elm Road Units carrying costs, and a request for recovery of increased ATC-related transmission costs through December 31, 2007. This order resulted in a net 0.15% decrease, on average, in retail electric rates for 2007. The PSCW also approved the recovery of 100% AFUDC on the Top of Iowa III wind project beginning in November 2006 and continuing until construction on the project ceased.


b.

Fuel rules.


Actual electric fuel costs are subject to reconciliation to the amount approved by the PSCW in MGE's rate order covering the applicable period. Known as "fuel rules," the process can produce a fuel surcharge for MGE or require MGE to make a refund in the form of a credit, to the extent that the actual fuel costs are outside a range higher or lower than the level authorized by the PSCW in that rate order.


Under fuel rules, MGE could apply for a fuel surcharge if its actual electric fuel costs exceeded 102% of the electric fuel costs allowed in its latest rate order. Conversely, MGE could be required to provide a fuel credit to its customers if actual electric fuel costs were less than 98% of the electric fuel costs allowed in that order.


The PSCW authorized an interim fuel credit in May 2009 as a result of decreased actual electric fuel costs. The interim fuel credit order required a credit on customer bills that was based on actual costs from January through March and forecasted costs for the remainder of the year. The order was subject to refund with interest at 10.8%. The interim fuel credit resulted in $4.6 million reduction in customer revenues. As of December 31, 2009, MGE accrued and expects to refund $0.3 million, including interest, to customers.




100




The PSCW approved a $0.00239 per kWh interim fuel surcharge on MGE's electric rates effective May 6, 2008, to cover increased fuel and purchased power expenses. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, this interim surcharge resulted in a $5.1 million increase to electric rates. Pursuant to a stipulation agreement among MGE and intervenors in the proceeding, which was approved by the PSCW on October 24, 2008, the interim surcharge remained in effect until the end of the year. The stipulation agreement however, required MGE to review its 2008 monitored fuel costs at year-end and to refund to customers, with interest at 10.8%, any amount by which its actual fuel costs fall short of the monitored fuel costs collected in rates. To account for this refund, MGE recorded a $5.5 million reduction to other electric revenues in the twelve months ended December 31, 2008. In March 2009, the PSCW completed their audit of the 2008 electric fuel costs and issued a final order, which applied this refund to customers' accounts in March 2009.


On April 26, 2007, the PSCW approved a $0.00339 per kWh interim fuel surcharge on MGE's electric rates to cover increased fuel and purchased power expenses. Pursuant to the provisions of the fuel surcharge, MGE's electric revenues resulting from this surcharge were subject to refund and interest at 11%. On August 31, 2007, MGE received a final decision which reduced the fuel surcharge from $0.00339 per kWh to $0.00242 per kWh. These surcharges resulted in a gross increase to electric rates of $6.9 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007. For the interim period April 26, 2007, through August 31, 2007, the difference between the interim surcharge and the final surcharge was required to be refunded to customers. Accordingly, in October 2007, a refund of $1.3 million was applied to customers' accounts.


As a result of a decrease in electric fuel costs during the twelve months ended December 31, 2006, as compared to those in the order, an interim fuel credit was approved by the PSCW. To account for this credit, MGE recorded a $19.1 million reduction to other electric revenues. This reduction to other electric revenues reflected MGE's estimated obligation under the interim fuel credit and subject to refund provision implemented by the PSCW during 2006. During the year ended December 31, 2006, $16.8 million had been credited to electric customers. An additional $2.4 million (includes interest) was applied to customers' accounts in April 2007.


18.

Commitments.


a.

Coal Contracts - MGE Energy and MGE.


MGE has coal supply contracts related to the Blount plant. As of December 31, 2009, total coal commitments related to the Blount plant are estimated to be $0.8 million for 2010. Fuel procurement for MGE's jointly owned Columbia and Elm Road plants are handled by Alliant and Wisconsin Energy Corporation, respectively, the operating companies. If any minimum purchase obligations must be paid under these contracts, management believes these obligations would be considered costs of service and recoverable in rates. As of December 31, 2009, MGE's share of the total coal commitments for the Columbia and Elm Road plants are estimated to be $26.7 million in 2010, $16.8 million in 2011, $6.9 million in 2012, $3.4 million in 2013, and $3.4 million in 2014.


b.

Purchased Power Contracts - MGE Energy and MGE.


MGE has several purchase power agreements to help meet future electric supply requirements. As of December 31, 2009, MGE's total commitments for energy and purchase power agreements for capacity and wind purchase power agreements are estimated to be $27.5 million in 2010, $27.9 million in 2011, $35.8 million in 2012, $43.7 million in 2013, and $41.5 million in 2014. Management expects to recover these costs in future customer rates. Included in these numbers is the estimated commitment related to a purchase power agreement that is considered a lease. See Footnote 18h for additional information.


In October 2008, MGE entered into a ten-year purchase power agreement to help meet future electric supply requirements. Under this agreement, MGE has agreed to purchase 50 MW of wind power from Osceola Windpower II, LLC, which is located in Iowa. This facility became operational in October 2008. MGE does not have any capacity payment commitments under this agreement. However, MGE is obligated to purchase its ratable share of the energy produced by the project. MGE's commitment related to its ratable share of energy produced by the project has been estimated and is included in the above numbers.




101




c.

Natural Gas Transportation and Storage Contracts - MGE Energy and MGE.


MGE's natural gas transportation and storage contracts require fixed monthly payments for firm supply pipeline transportation and storage capacity. The pricing components of the fixed monthly payments for the transportation and storage contracts are established by FERC but may be subject to change. As of December 31, 2009, these payments are estimated to be $15.1 million in 2010, $10.0 million in 2011, $1.1 million in 2012, $1.0 million in 2013, and $0.4 million in 2014. MGE also has natural gas supply commitments. These commitments include market-based pricing. As of December 31, 2009, total natural gas supply commitments are estimated to be $27.5 million in 2010 and $0.7 million in 2011. Management expects to recover these costs in future customer rates.


d.

Environmental - MGE Energy and MGE.


Solid Waste

MGE is listed as a potentially responsible party for a site the EPA has placed on the national priorities Superfund list. The Lenz Oil site in Lemont, Illinois, was used for storing and processing waste oil for several years. This site requires clean up under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act. A group of companies, including MGE, is currently working on cleaning up the site. Management believes that its share of the final cleanup costs for the Lenz Oil site will not result in any materially adverse effects on MGE's operations, cash flows, or financial position. Insurance may cover a portion of the cleanup costs. Management believes that the cleanup costs not covered by insurance will be recovered in current and future rates. As of December 31, 2009, the EPA has agreed on a remedy for the Lenz Oil site. The remedy included a five year $2.2 million implementation plan. The EPA has asked all potentially responsible parties to pay upfront for this five year implementation plan. MGE's portion is less than $0.1 million.


Water Quality

MGE is subject to water quality regulations issued by the WDNR. These regulations include discharge standards, which require the use of effluent-treatment processes equivalent to categorical "best practicable" or "best available" technologies under compliance schedules established under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. The WDNR has published categorical regulations for chemical and thermal discharges from electric-steam generating plants. The regulations limit discharges from MGE's plants into Lake Monona and other Wisconsin waters.


The WDNR is promulgating revised rules to regulate thermal effluent discharges from point sources in Wisconsin. The current draft rules apply strict standards for thermal discharges into inland lakes, streams, rivers, and the Great Lakes. While dischargers can apply for variances, MGE may incur additional capital expenditures, such as equipment upgrades at Blount and Columbia, if the variances are not granted. Costs at Blount have not been fully determined, however, capital expenditures may include cooling towers, which in past analyses have been shown to be cost prohibitive. Potential costs at Columbia have not been determined at this time. Based on initial reviews of the current revised rules, we do not expect the Elm Road Units to be effected by these rules.


Energy Efficiency and Renewables

Effective March 31, 2006, Wisconsin adopted the Energy Efficiency and Renewables Act that focuses on three areas: increasing the use of renewable energy in Wisconsin, promoting the development of renewable energy technologies, and strengthening the state's energy efficiency programs. This legislation requires that by 2015, 10% of the state's electricity be generated from renewable resources. MGE expects the cost to comply with the Act and its accompanying regulations will be recoverable through current and future rates.


Air Quality

Air quality regulations promulgated by the EPA and WDNR in accordance with the Federal Clean Air Act and the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 impose restrictions on emission of particulates, sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and other pollutants and require permits for operation of emission sources. These permits have been obtained by MGE and must be renewed periodically.


Various initiatives, including the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards, new source performance standards (NSPS) and the Clean Air Visibility Rule (also known as the Regional Haze Rule), as well as state mercury emissions limits, are expected to result in additional operating and capital expenditure costs for electric generating units.



102




Ozone NAAQS

On March 12, 2008, the EPA announced a new 8-hour NAAQS for ozone that is more stringent than the current standard (standard lowered from 0.08 to 0.075 parts per million). States (including Wisconsin) must monitor and collect data on ozone levels in order to determine attainment or nonattainment status on a county and/or area basis. Currently available monitoring data for Dane, Columbia and Milwaukee counties (where our generation facilities are located) demonstrates attainment with the March 12, 2008 standard.


On January 6, 2010, EPA published a proposed rule reconsidering the March 12, 2008 8-hour ozone standard. In this proposed rule, EPA states their intent to revise both the primary (set for protection of public health) and secondary (set for protection of public welfare and environment) ozone standards and indicates that they will set an 8-hour ambient ozone standard between 0.060 – 0.070 parts per million (ppm). EPA further indicates that they will set a secondary standard of 7 – 15 ppm-hours measured on a weighted average over a three-month period during the ozone season.


We cannot determine at this time if Dane, Columbia and/or Milwaukee counties, will be in attainment with the potential revised standards (i.e., have ambient air quality that is at or below the attainment level ultimately selected by the EPA), but there is modeling to suggest the potential for nonattainment in any or all of these counties with the range currently under consideration by the EPA. A nonattainment designation for the 8-hour ozone standard in any of these counties has the potential to increase operating and capital expenditures at Columbia (located in Columbia County), Blount and WCCF (located in Dane County) and Elm Road (located in Milwaukee County).


Particulate Matter NAAQS

In 2006, the EPA lowered the acceptable 24-hour National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter, or PM2.5 – i.e., a particulate matter air pollutant that is 2.5 microns or smaller in size. States monitor and collect data on PM2.5 levels and recommend counties/areas within their state for attainment or nonattainment with the NAAQS. The EPA makes the final decision on attainment/nonattainment areas. In mid-December 2008, the EPA designated several areas of the State, including Dane County (where Blount and WCCF are located), a portion of Columbia County (where Columbia is located), and the Milwaukee/Racine area (where Elm Road is located) as nonattainment areas for the 24-hour PM2.5 standard. The EPA made these initial determinations based on monitoring data for the years 2005-2007 data. On October 8, 2009, EPA announced its final PM2.5 attainment designations for Wisconsin using the 2006 through 2008 data and only Milwaukee, Racine and Waukesha Counties were designated as nonattainment. The State of Wisconsin will need to develop a SIP by early 2012 for those counties that remain designated as nonattainment. Implementation of the fine particulate NAAQS could affect capital, operational and maintenance expenses at MGE generating facilities.


In February 2009, the PM2.5 standards were remanded to the EPA by the D.C. Circuit Court. The current primary hourly and annual standards will remain in place as the EPA reviews both the primary and secondary standard as per the D.C. Circuit Court decision. If the standards are made more stringent, more counties where our generation is located could become nonattainment; however, that cannot be known until the standards are finalized.


Nitrogen Dioxide NAAQS

On January 22, 2010, the EPA revised its primary Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) NAAQS. The current annual primary NO2 standard remains, while a one-hour 100 parts per billion (ppb) standard has been added that focuses on near-roadway exposures to NO2. The EPA expects states to submit initial recommendations for nonattainment areas by January 2011 using 2008-2010 data. The EPA plans to make final attainment and nonattainment designations by January 2012. The EPA has not changed the secondary NAAQS for NO2, but intends to address potential changes as part of a secondary review. It is unclear at this time how MGE's power plants would be affected by this proposed revision.


Nitrogen Oxide Emission Budget

In 1998, the EPA issued a rule that imposed a NOx emission budget for emission sources in Wisconsin. In 2000, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia invalidated a portion of the rule as applied to Wisconsin; however, the Court stayed that portion of the challenge concerning Wisconsin's alleged impacts on downwind, 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas. EPA has also stayed that portion of the rule concerning Wisconsin's alleged impacts on downwind 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas. If that portion of the rule concerning 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas is upheld, the resulting NOx emission budget for Wisconsin could potentially affect the level of permissible NOx emissions from Blount, Columbia, and WCCF.



103




Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS

On November 16, 2009, the EPA proposed to change the primary Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS from a 140 parts per billion (ppb) standard measured over a twenty-four hour period to an hourly standard. The EPA is proposing a range of 50 – 100 ppb hourly standard. The EPA has also indicated that a secondary NAAQS standard for SO2 will be proposed in 2010. In addition to the proposed changes to the SO2 NAAQS, the EPA is also proposing that SO2 monitoring sites be redesigned so that they monitor areas where short-term concentrations of SO2 are more likely. The EPA is currently proposing that roughly 345 monitoring locations be created based on high-level SO2 concentration areas and high population/high SO2 level areas. Based on the proposed rule, we anticipate that roadside monitors would be placed in Dane and Milwaukee counties, but the actual placement has not been determined. It is unclear at this time how MGE's power plants would be affected by this proposed revision.


MACT Standards for Electric Utilities

On February 9, 2009, the Justice Department, on behalf of the EPA, asked the Supreme Court to dismiss EPA's petition for review of the D.C. Circuit Court's vacatur of the Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR). This withdrawal paves the way for the EPA to develop MACT standards for electric utilities (for mercury as well as other Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs)).


As part of the EPA's process for developing MACT standards for electric utilities, the EPA has sent out an Information Collection Request (ICR) to hundreds of utilities across the United States that have coal and oil-burning electric generating units. The EPA has indicated that they will use the information collected from this ICR to assist in the development of electric generating unit MACT standards. Under this ICR Blount and Columbia received letters requesting information on pollution control equipment. Elm Road is required to perform testing in addition to responding to the information requests.


It is unclear at this time when electric generating unit MACT standards will be created for electric utilities and how they will affect MGE's operations. The implementation of the MACT standards may affect our facilities that burn coal and oil. However, we are uncertain of the exact cost or operational impact until the final MACT standards are known.


Columbia


In September 2008, the Wisconsin DNR issued a Title V renewal operating permit to WPL (the operator and permit holder) for Columbia. A citizen group petitioned EPA to object to the issuance of the permit renewal. In October 2009, the EPA issued an order granting in part and denying in part the petition and sent the operating permit back to the Wisconsin DNR for further review based on the EPA order. The EPA order gave WDNR 90 days to address the objections and take action on the September 2008 operating permit. The Wisconsin DNR has been working with the EPA and has been in contact with WPL related to this matter. To date, no changes have been made to the previously issued permit for Columbia. MGE is unable to predict what actions the WDNR or EPA may take on the permit.


In October 2009, the Sierra Club provided notice of its intent to file a civil lawsuit against the owners and operator of Columbia for alleged violations of the Clean Air Act. WPL is the plant operator and permit holder, and owns 46.2% of Columbia. Wisconsin Public Service Corporation (WPSC) owns a 31.8% interest, and MGE owns a 22% interest in Columbia. Among other things, this notice alleges the failure to obtain necessary air permits and implement necessary emission controls associated with activities undertaken in approximately 2000 and 2005. If pursued and successful, this lawsuit could result in civil penalties, injunctive relief, as well as increased capital and operating/maintenance expenditures at Columbia. WPL, the operator and permit holder for Columbia, has informed MGE that it is reviewing the allegations and is currently unable to predict the impact of the allegations on Columbia's finances or operations at this time.


In December 2009, the EPA sent a Notice of Violation (NOV) to the owners and operator of Columbia. The NOV alleges that the owners and operator failed to comply with appropriate pre-construction review and permitting requirements of the New Source Review (NSR) program, and as a result violated the PSD program requirements, Title V Operating Permit requirements of the CAA and the SIP. The owners of Columbia have begun discussions with the EPA regarding the NOV.




104




If pursued and successful, these actions could result in civil penalties in amounts of up to $37,500 per day (for all joint owners) for each violation and/or injunctive relief to require installation of pollution control technology at Columbia, which would increase future capital and operating expenditures. WPL, the plant operator and permit holder, has informed MGE that it is in the process of evaluating the allegations and is unable to predict the impact of the allegations on Columbia's finances or operations at this time, but believes that an adverse outcome could be significant. WPL has also informed MGE and WPSC that the current intent is to defend against these actions because WPL believes the projects in question did not violate the CAA. Nevertheless, the owners are exploring settlement options while simultaneously preparing to defend against the allegations. MGE has not recognized any related loss contingency amounts as of December 31, 2009.


 In April 2009, the Columbia owners filed a Certificate of Authority with the PSCW requesting authorization of an emissions reduction project as a result of an environmental initiative. A decision is currently expected in the first quarter of 2010. The operator's current estimates show that MGE's share of the capital expenditures required to comply with this project will be approximately $140 million. According to the current estimate, this project is expected to result in an increase to Columbia's ongoing operating expenses. MGE expects that the costs pertaining to this project will be fully recoverable through rates. The PSCW is permitting MGE to defer pre-certification and pre-construction costs related to compliance with environmental regulations at Columbia. Additionally, MGE is entitled to a carrying cost on the related pre-construction costs at a 100% AFUDC rate. As of December 31, 2009, MGE had incurred $0.9 million (excluding carrying costs) in deferred pre-certification and pre-construction expenditures at Columbia related to this environmental initiative.


As of December 31, 2009, Columbia entered into various contractual commitments with vendors for a small portion of the aforementioned expenditures as well as other Columbia environmental projects. MGE is indirectly a party to these agreements as a result of its joint ownership of Columbia and is also contractually obligated, under the applicable ownership and operating agreements, with respect to any commitments made. MGE has a 22% ownership interest in Columbia. MGE's share of these commitments is $0.3 million for 2010. These costs are expected to be capitalized and included in the consolidated balance sheets of MGE Energy and MGE.


See Footnote 21 for additional environmental commitments related to the Elm Road, including the WPDES permit agreement with Clean Wisconsin, Inc. and Sierra Club.


e.

Chattel Paper Agreement and Other Guarantees - MGE Energy and MGE.


MGE makes available to qualifying customers a financing program for the purchase and installation of energy-related equipment that will provide more efficient use of utility service at the customer's property. MGE is party to a chattel paper purchase agreement with a financial institution under which it can sell or finance an undivided interest with recourse, in up to $10.0 million of the financing program receivables, until August 31, 2010. At December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively, MGE had sold a $3.7 million, $3.8 million, and $3.8 million interest in these receivables. MGE retains the servicing responsibility for these receivables.


MGE accounts for servicing rights under the amortization method. Initial determination of the servicing asset fair value is based on the present value of the estimated future cash flows. The discount rate is based on the PSCW authorized weighted cost of capital.


MGE maintains responsibility for collecting and remitting loan payments from customers to the financial institution and does not retain any interest in the assets sold to the financial institution. At each of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, MGE had recorded a servicing asset of $0.1 million. MGE recognized gains of less than $0.1 million in each of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, in connection with the sale of loan assets. The servicing asset recognized and the amount amortized in 2009 was less than $0.1 million. The loan assets are sold to the financial institution at cost, which approximates fair value in view of their market rates of interest. During 2009, 2008, and 2007, MGE received approximately $0.6 million, $0.8 million, and $0.5 million, respectively, from the financial institution for the sale of loan assets. During those same years, payments of $0.8 million, $0.9 million, and $1.9 million, respectively, were made by MGE to the financial institution.




105




MGE would be required to perform under its guarantee if a customer defaulted on its loan. The energy-related equipment installed at the customer sites is used to secure the customer loans. The loan balances outstanding at December 31, 2009, approximate the fair value of the energy-related equipment acting as collateral. The length of the MGE guarantee to the financial institution varies from one to ten years depending on the term of the customer loan. Principal payments for the next five years on the loans are $0.9 million in 2010, $0.6 million in 2011, $0.4 million in 2012, $0.4 million in 2013, and $0.3 million in 2014.


f.

Elm Road Purchase Commitments - MGE Energy and MGE.


Based on current forecasts, the remaining capital costs for the Elm Road Units are estimated to be $11.7 million in 2010, and $0.3 million in 2011. See Footnote 21a for additional information regarding construction costs associated with the Elm Road Units.


g.

Top of Iowa III Wind Project Commitments - MGE Energy and MGE.


MGE has a service and maintenance agreement related to the Top of Iowa III wind project which results in an estimated commitment of $0.8 million in each year for 2010, 2011, and 2012.


h.

Leases - MGE Energy and MGE.


MGE has noncancelable operating leases, primarily for combustion turbines, railcars, and computer equipment. The operating leases generally do not contain renewal options, with the exception of certain railcar operating leases. These leases have a renewal option of one year or less. MGE is required to pay all executory costs such as maintenance and insurance for its leases. MGE also has a purchase power agreement that is considered a lease. There are no minimum future lease payments related to this purchase power agreement. However, the estimated commitment for this purchase power agreement has been included in the purchase power contracts commitments. See Footnote 18b for additional information.


Future minimum rental payments at December 31, 2009, under agreements classified as operating leases with noncancelable terms in excess of one year are as follows:


(In thousands)

 

2010

$2,339

2011

2,093

2012

1,692

2013

1,502

2014

1,059

Thereafter

10,110

Total minimum future

lease payments

$18,795


Rental expense under operating leases (excluding the purchase power agreement) totaled $3.1 million for 2009, $3.1 million for 2008, and $3.0 million for 2007. Rental expense related to the purchase power agreement for 2009 and 2008 were $7.6 million and $2.0 million, respectively.


i.

Other Legal Matters.


MGE is involved in various other legal matters that are being defended and handled in the normal course of business. MGE maintains accruals for such costs that are probable of being incurred and subject to reasonable estimation. As of December 31, 2009, MGE has a total of $1.5 million accrued in the financial statements for such matters. The ultimate outcomes of such matters are uncertain and may have an adverse effect on MGE Energy's and MGE's results of operations or cash flows.




106




j.

Wind Development Rights - MGE Energy.


In June 2009, MGE Energy, through its subsidiary MAGAEL, LLC, entered into agreements to purchase land development rights, including land option agreements, electrical interconnection rights, wind data, engineering plans, licenses, permits, and governmental approvals for two wind development sites. A payment of $1.2 million was made related to these agreements in 2009. Future payments related to these agreements are estimated to be $1.2 million in 2010, $0.8 million in 2011, $3.2 million in 2012, $0.4 million in 2013, $0.1 million in 2014, $1.7 million in 2015, and $0.4 million in 2016. These wind development rights may potentially be used to develop wind farms in three counties in Iowa up to approximately 175 MWs; however, neither MAGAEL nor MGE Energy has any obligation to build any wind generators at these sites.


k.

Other Commitments.


MGE Energy holds an investment in a nonpublic entity. From time to time, this entity requires additional capital infusions from their investors. MGE Energy has committed to contribute $0.5 million in capital for such infusions. The timing of these infusions is dependent on the needs of the investee and is therefore uncertain at this time.


In addition, MGE Energy has a three year agreement with a venture debt fund expiring in December 2010. MGE Energy has committed to invest up to a total of $1.0 million into this fund. As of December 31, 2009, MGE Energy has $0.4 million remaining in commitments. The timing of infusions is dependent on the needs of the fund and is therefore uncertain at this time.


MGE has a commitment to the City of Madison for certain "green energy" projects. These funds will primarily be used to construct or purchase assets that will be owned by MGE and will be included in the property, plant and equipment balance on the MGE Energy's and MGE's financial statements once the costs are incurred. The timing of the capital expenditures is dependent on the feasibility of the individual projects. MGE paid $0.2 million in 2009, and expects $0.2 million in both 2010 and 2011, and $0.3 million in 2012.


MGE has entered into easements related to wind projects. Estimated payments for these easements are $0.1 million in each of the years 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013.


19.

Blount Station - MGE Energy and MGE.


In 2006, MGE announced a plan to reduce capacity at Blount from 190 MW to 100 MW by the end of 2011. As part of the plan, coal use at Blount will be discontinued. MGE has determined that certain employee positions will be eliminated as a result of this plan.


In March 2009, MGE received notification from MISO that in order to meet national electric system reliability standards, MGE will need to keep Blount available at full capacity until MISO declares that the 90 MW are no longer needed for system reliability. Currently, MGE estimates the reduction in capacity will occur in 2013. The transition from burning coal to burning only natural gas will still occur by the end of 2011. After the transition, the entire plant will be operated exclusively on natural gas. MGE is working with MISO to develop a detailed agreement for this continued operation, which among other things will include a mechanism for cost recovery.


MGE has entered into agreements providing severance benefits to employees affected by the exit plan. These benefits are being recognized ratably over the expected future service period of the employees. Total benefits expected to be paid are as follows: $0.1 million in 2010, $0.8 million in 2011, and $0.3 million in 2013. Total benefits paid as of December 31, 2009, were $0.2 million.


MGE continues to recover in rates the costs associated with the severance benefits at Blount in the year of expected cash payment. The severance charges to be recovered in rates have been deferred and recognized on the consolidated balance sheet of MGE Energy and MGE as a regulatory asset.




107




The following table presents the activity in the restructuring accrual from December 31, 2008, through December 31, 2009:

(In thousands)

 

Balance at December 31, 2008

$671

Additional expense, net (deferred)

98

Cash payments during the period

-

Balance at December 31, 2009

$769


The exit plan has also resulted in accelerated depreciation for the Blount assets expected to be retired in 2011 and 2013. The majority of these assets are being recovered in rates over a four-year period that began in 2008, with the remaining balance recovered by the end of 2013. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, $3.4 million of accelerated depreciation expense had been recognized and recovered in rates each year.


In January 2010, MGE announced it will change its primary fuel at Blount from coal to natural gas. Coal will become the secondary fuel at Blount. This switch to natural gas as a primary fuel will occur in March 2010. As a result of this change, certain employee positions will be eliminated and severance benefits will be paid in 2010 totaling $0.4 million. These severance benefits were accelerated into 2010 from 2011, but are expected to be offset by lower payroll charges in 2010.


20.

Asset Retirement Obligations - MGE Energy and MGE.


Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations


Effective January 1, 2003, MGE recorded an obligation for the fair value of its legal liability for asset retirement obligations associated with removing an electric substation, a combustion turbine generating unit, wind generating facilities, and photovoltaic generating facilities, all of which are located on property not owned by MGE Energy and MGE and would be removed upon the ultimate end of the lease. The significant conditional AROs identified by MGE included the costs of abandoning in place gas services and mains, the abatement and disposal of equipment and buildings contaminated with asbestos and polychlorinated biphenyls, and the proper disposal and removal of tanks. Changes in management's assumptions regarding settlement dates, settlement methods, or assigned probabilities could have had a material effect on the liabilities recorded by MGE at December 31, 2009, as well as the regulatory asset recorded.


MGE also may have asset retirement obligations relating to the removal of various assets, such as certain electric and gas distribution facilities. These facilities are generally located on property owned by third parties, on which MGE is permitted to operate by lease, permit, easement, license, or service agreement. The asset retirement obligations associated with these facilities cannot be reasonably determined due to the indeterminate life of the related agreements.


The following table shows costs as of December 31, 2007 and 2008, and changes to the asset retirement obligations and accumulated depreciation through December 31, 2009. Amounts include conditional AROs.


(In thousands)

(a)

Original Asset

Retirement

Obligation

 

(b)

Accumulated

Accretion

 

(c)

(a + b)

Asset

Retirement

Obligation

 

(d)

Accumulated

Depreciation-

Related Asset

Balance, December 31, 2007

$5,365

 

$8,945

 

$14,310

 

$1,837

Changes through December 31, 2008

(20)

 

704

 

684

 

130

Balance, December 31, 2008

$5,345

 

$9,649

 

$14,994

 

$1,967

Changes through December 31, 2009

707

 

812

 

1,519

 

198

Balance, December 31, 2009

$6,052

 

$10,461

 

$16,513

 

$2,165


In 2009 and 2008, MGE reduced accumulated accretion by $0.1 million due to the removal and retirement of assets.


Non-ARO Costs


Accumulated costs of removal that are non-ARO obligations are classified within the financial statements as regulatory liabilities. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, there were $12.2 million and $12.8 million of these costs recorded as regulatory liabilities within the financial statements, respectively.



108




21.

Elm Road - MGE Energy and MGE.


a.

Construction.


MGE Power Elm Road owns an 8.33% ownership interest in each of two 615 MW coal-fired generating units in Oak Creek, Wisconsin. Unit 1 entered commercial operation on February 2, 2010. Unit 2 is under construction, but is expected to enter commercial operation in August 2010. MGE Power Elm Road's sole principal asset is that ownership interest in those generating units. Each owner provides its own financing and reflects its respective portion of the facility and costs in its financial statements. MGE Power Elm Road has leased the Elm Road units to MGE pursuant to separate facility lease agreements for each unit. These leases were authorized by order of the PSCW in accordance with applicable provisions of Wisconsin law that authorized financing of new generation through facility leases. The PSCW order establishes a cap on the construction costs that may be passed through the lease agreements to MGE and its customers, through rates. Additional costs attributable to force majeure events, as defined in the leases, do not count against this cap, but are subject to PSCW review and determination that the costs were prudently incurred.


The estimated share of capital costs for that ownership interest in both units is approximately $180 million which includes the Bechtel settlement described below (excluding capitalized interest). At December 31, 2009, $168.3 million (excluding capitalized interest) related to this project is reflected in the construction work in progress balance on MGE Energy's and MGE's consolidated balance sheets. MGE Power Elm Road calculates capitalized interest on the Elm Road project. At December 31, 2009, MGE Power Elm Road recorded a total of $14.2 million in capitalized interest related to the Elm Road project which is reflected in the construction work in progress balance on MGE Energy's and MGE's consolidated balance sheets.


On December 23, 2008, we received notice from Elm Road Services, LLC (ERS) that it had received a letter from Bechtel containing Bechtel's formal claim for schedule and cost relief on the construction of the Elm Road units. On November 2, 2009, we received notice from ERS that Bechtel amended its claim to increase its request for cost relief to approximately $32.5 million and for schedule relief by approximately one month for both Unit 1 and Unit 2. Bechtel is constructing the Elm Road units under a turnkey engineering, procurement and construction contract with ERS, which is the project manager for the Elm Road units.


MGE Energy received notice from Elm Road Services, LLC (ERS) that, effective December 16, 2009, ERS and Bechtel entered into a Settlement Agreement and Release (the Agreement) that settles all claims between them regarding the Elm Road Units. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, ERS will pay to Bechtel $72 million to settle these claims, of which $10 million was paid in 2009 and the remaining $62 million will be paid in six additional installments in 2010 upon the achievement of specific project milestones. MGE Energy's share will be $5.4 million (after adjustments for common site costs). In addition, Bechtel will receive 120 days of schedule relief for Unit 1 and 60 days for Unit 2. Therefore, the guaranteed contract date of September 29, 2009, for Unit 1 was extended to January 27, 2010, and the guaranteed contract date of September 29, 2010, for Unit 2 will be extended to November 28, 2010. On February 2, 2010, Unit 1 became operational and Bechtel is currently targeting turnover of Unit 2 in the August 2010. The Agreement also provides for Bechtel's release of ERS from all matters related to Bechtel's claims, and for ERS' release of Bechtel from all matters related to ERS' claims currently subject to arbitration, among other things.


b.

Consolidation.


In connection with this project, MGE Energy and its subsidiaries entered into various agreements, including facility lease agreements between MGE Power Elm Road (a nonregulated subsidiary of MGE Energy) and MGE with respect to each of the generating units. The financial terms of the facility leases include a capital structure of 55% equity and 45% long-term debt, return on equity of 12.7%, a lease term of 30 years, and a 5% lease payment reduction in the first five years.


Based on the nature and terms of the leasing agreements and the relationship they establish, MGE absorbs a majority of the expected losses, residual value, or both, associated with the ownership of MGE Power Elm Road. MGE also is the party most closely associated with MGE Power Elm Road. As a result, MGE is the primary beneficiary and MGE Power Elm Road is a VIE under applicable accounting requirements. Accordingly, MGE Power Elm Road has been consolidated in the financial statements of MGE.


MGE Energy's share of the equity and net income (through its wholly owned subsidiary MGE Power) of MGE Power Elm Road is classified within the MGE financial statements as noncontrolling interest.



109




c.

Nonregulated Revenues.


MGE has approval from the PSCW to defer the recovery of the payments made to MGE Power Elm Road for carrying costs during construction of the generating units, management fees, and community impact mitigation costs. MGE estimates that the total carrying costs on the Elm Road project will be $59.5 million. This estimate is subject to change based on changes in interest rates, timing of capital expenditures, and the total project cost.


MGE began collecting the carrying costs in rates in 2006. These amounts are being collected over multiple years. Of these costs, MGE estimates that $17.6 million relates to the capitalized interest and the debt portion of the facility. These costs will be recognized over the period in which the generating units will be depreciated. The remaining $41.9 million represents the equity portion and is being recognized over the period allowed for recovery in rates.


During 2009, MGE recovered $9.5 million related to carrying costs in electric rates for its investment in MGE Power Elm Road. Of this amount, $1.5 million relates to the debt portion of the facility and was deferred on the consolidated financial statements of MGE Energy and MGE. The remaining $8.0 million represents the equity portion and was recognized as nonregulated revenues in the consolidated financial statements of MGE Energy and MGE. In addition, MGE recovered $1.6 million related to management fees, community impact mitigation costs, and other related costs.


d.

WPDES Permit.


On July 31, 2008, the WDNR issued the final modified WPDES permit for the Elm Road Facility with no substantive changes from the previously issued draft permit allowing for a once-through cooling system. The deadline for a legal challenge to the permit has expired without appeal.

 

On July 31, 2008, the joint owners of the Oak Creek expansion reached an agreement with Clean Wisconsin, Inc. and Sierra Club, the groups opposing the WPDES permit. Under the settlement agreement, these groups agreed to withdraw their opposition to the modified WPDES permit. The joint owners committed to various environmental projects, including projects designed to address greenhouse gas emissions and water quality. MGE's share of those commitments involved a payment of $0.4 million for greenhouse gas reduction efforts. Additional payments of approximately $0.3 million, subject to regulatory approval, will be made annually over 24 years (2011-2034) to address water quality issues in Lake Michigan. In December 2009, the PSCW authorized recovery of the 2011 payment to address water quality issues.


22.

Adoption of Accounting Principles and Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements - MGE Energy and MGE.


a.

Consolidation and Business Combinations.


In December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance within the Codification's Consolidation and Business Combinations topics that changed the accounting and reporting for business acquisitions and noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary as well as the accounting and reporting for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This authoritative guidance became effective for MGE Energy and MGE as of January 1, 2009, and affected the presentation of the noncontrolling interest on MGE's financial statements.


b.

Derivative and Hedging.


In March 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance within the Codification's Derivative and Hedging topic which intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity's financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. It is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. MGE Energy and MGE adopted this authoritative guidance as of January 1, 2009. See Footnote 16 for additional information.




110




c.

Compensation-Retirement Benefits.


In December 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance within the Codification's Compensation-Retirement Benefits topic that provides guidance on employer's disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The adoption of this authoritative guidance is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. This authoritative guidance did not have any financial impact, but required additional disclosures. See footnote 13 for additional information.


d.

Financial Instruments.


In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance within the Codification's Financial Instruments topic that required disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. This authoritative guidance became effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. MGE Energy and MGE did not elect to early adopt this authoritative guidance. This authoritative guidance did not have any financial impact, but required additional disclosures. See Footnote 11 for additional information.


e.

Subsequent Events.


In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance within the Codification's Subsequent Events topic which established general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the issuance of financial statements. Furthermore, this authoritative guidance required entities to disclose the date through which subsequent events were evaluated. This authoritative guidance became effective for interim or annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. This authoritative guidance did not have any financial impact, but required additional disclosures. See Footnote 26 for additional information.


f.

Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets.


In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance within the Codification's Transfers and Servicing topic with accounting for transfers of financial assets. This statement removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity from authoritative guidance on accounting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities. This statement also removes the exception for qualifying special-purpose entities from authoritative guidance on consolidation of variable interest entities. MGE Energy and MGE will adopt this authoritative guidance as of January 1, 2010. This authoritative guidance will not have a material financial impact, but requires additional disclosures.


g.

Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.


In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance within the Codification's Consolidation topic with improvements involved with variable-interest entities. These amendments include the elimination of the exemption for qualifying special purpose entities, a new approach for determining consolidation of a variable-interest entity and changes to when it is necessary to reassess consolidation of a variable interest entity. MGE Energy and MGE will adopt this authoritative guidance as of January 1, 2010. This authoritative guidance will not have any financial impact, but requires additional disclosures.


h.

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.


In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance within the Codification's Generally Accepted Accounting Principles topic which established the Codification as the single source of authoritative GAAP recognized by FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities except for guidance issued by the SEC. MGE Energy and MGE adopted this authoritative guidance as of September 30, 2009. The Codification superseded all reporting standards but did not change GAAP. This authoritative guidance did not have any financial impact; however references to accounting principles were updated to reflect the Codification.




111




23.

Segment Information - MGE Energy and MGE.


The electric utility business purchases, generates and distributes electricity, and contracts for transmission service. The gas utility business purchases and distributes natural gas and contracts for the transportation of natural gas. Both the electric and gas segments operate through MGE Energy's principal subsidiary, MGE.


The nonregulated energy operations are conducted through MGE Energy's subsidiaries: MGE Power, MGE Power West Campus, and MGE Power Elm Road. These subsidiaries have been formed to construct, own and lease new electric generating capacity to assist MGE. MGE Power West Campus owns a controlling interest in the electric generation plant of the natural gas-fired cogeneration facility on the UW campus, which is leased to MGE, and MGE Power Elm Road has an undivided 8.33% ownership interest in each of two 615 MW generating units being constructed in Oak Creek, Wisconsin. MGE Power Elm Road's portion is also being leased to MGE.


The transmission investment segment invests, through MGE Transco, in ATC, a company that provides electric transmission services primarily in Wisconsin. See Footnote 4 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of MGE Transco and the investment in ATC.


The "All other" segment includes: corporate, CWDC, MAGAEL, and MGE Construct. These entities' operations consist of investing in companies and property which relate to the regulated operations, financing the regulated operations, or providing construction services to the other subsidiaries.


General corporate expenses include the cost of executive management, corporate accounting and finance, information technology, risk management, human resources and legal functions, and employee benefits that are allocated to electric and gas segments based on formulas prescribed by the PSCW. Identifiable assets are those used in MGE's operations in each segment. Assets not allocated consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, investments, other accounts receivable, and prepaid assets.


Sales between our electric and gas segments are based on PSCW approved tariffed rates. Additionally, intersegment operations related to the leasing arrangement between our electric segment and MGE Power West Campus/MGE Power Elm Road are based on terms previously approved by the PSCW. Consistent with internal reporting, management has presented the direct financing capital lease between MGE and MGE Power West Campus as an operating lease for purposes of segment reporting. Lease payments made by MGE to MGE Power West Campus are shown as operating expenses. The lease payments received by MGE Power West Campus from MGE are shown as lease income in interdepartmental revenues. The depreciation expense associated with the WCCF is reflected in the nonregulated energy segment.




112




All prior year segment data has been re-presented to conform with the current year presentation and segment break out. The following table shows segment information for MGE Energy's and MGE's operations:


Operating revenues

Operating revenues

(In thousands)

MGE Energy

Electric

Gas

Non-

Regulated

Energy

Transmission

Investment

All

Others

Consolidation/

Elimination

Entries

Consolidated

Total

Year ended December 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating revenues

$332,324

$192,334

$ 9,161

$-

$ -

$-

$533,819

Interdepartmental revenues

524

7,681

14,899

-

-

(23,104)

-

Total operating revenues (loss)

332,848

200,015

24,060

-

-

(23,104)

533,819

Depreciation and amortization

(28,779)

(9,557)

(2,744)

-

-

-

(41,080)

Other operating expenses

(258,988)

(171,313)

(129)

(1)

(747)

23,104

(408,074)

Operating income (loss)

45,081

19,145

21,187

(1)

(747)

-

84,665

Other (deductions) income, net

(110)

(31)

-

8,172

65

-

8,096

Interest (expense) income, net

(10,678)

(3,012)

(2,690)

(1)

2,787

-

(13,594)

Income (loss) before taxes

34,293

16,102

18,497

8,170

2,105

-

79,167

Income tax (provision) benefit

(10,373)

(6,234)

(7,424)

(3,280)

(859)

-

(28,170)

Net income (loss)

$23,920

$9,868

$11,073

$4,890

$1,246

$-

$50,997

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2008

 

$345,962

$242,598

$7,433

$-

$-

$-

$595,993

Interdepartmental revenues

541

21,511

14,878

-

-

(36,930)

-

Total operating revenues (loss)

346,503

264,109

22,311

-

-

(36,930)

595,993

Depreciation and amortization

(27,354)

(9,175)

(2,744)

-

-

-

(39,273)

Other operating expenses

(270,671)

(234,593)

(105)

(1)

(498)

36,930

(468,938)

Operating income (loss)

48,478

20,341

19,462

(1)

(498)

-

87,782

Other (deductions) income, net

(38)

(1,660)

-

7,241

2,501

-

8,044

Interest (expense) income, net

(11,026)

(3,156)

(2,639)

-

2,819

-

(14,002)

Income (loss) before taxes

37,414

15,525

16,823

7,240

4,822

-

81,824

Income tax (provision) benefit

(11,718)

(5,741)

(6,752)

(2,914)

(1,931)

-

(29,056)

Net income (loss)

$25,696

$9,784

$10,071

$4,326

$2,891

$-

$52,768

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2007

 

$334,488

$197,925

$5,181

$-

$-

$-

$537,594

Interdepartmental revenues

506

21,134

14,858

-

-

(36,498)

-

Total operating revenues (loss)

334,994

219,059

20,039

-

-

(36,498)

537,594

Depreciation and amortization

(20,994)

(8,527)

(2,678)

-

-

-

(32,199)

Other operating expenses

(260,184)

(197,491)

(108)

(2)

(441)

36,498

(421,728)

Operating income (loss)

53,816

13,041

17,253

(2)

(441)

-

83,667

Other (deductions) income, net

642

(589)

-

6,047

(31)

-

6,069

Interest (expense) income, net

(9,860)

(2,962)

(2,509)

-

2,275

-

(13,056)

Income (loss) before taxes

44,598

9,490

14,744

6,045

1,803

-

76,680

Income tax (provision) benefit

(15,147)

(3,594)

(5,917)

(2,427)

(770)

-

(27,855)

Net income (loss)

$29,451

$5,896

$8,827

$3,618

$1,033

$-

$48,825




113





Operating revenues

Operating revenues

(In thousands)

MGE

Electric

Gas

Non-

Regulated

Energy

Transmission

Investment

Consolidation/

Elimination

Entries

Consolidated

Total

Year ended December 31, 2009







Operating revenues

$332,324

$192,334

$9,161

$-

$-

$533,819

Interdepartmental revenues

524

7,681

14,899

-

(23,104)

-

Total operating revenues (loss)

332,848

200,015

24,060

-

(23,104)

533,819

Depreciation and amortization

(28,779)

(9,557)

(2,744)

-

-

(41,080)

Other operating expenses*

(269,316)

(177,534)

(7,552)

(1)

23,104

(431,299)

Operating income (loss)*

34,753

12,924

13,764

(1)

-

61,440

Other (deductions) income, net *

(155)

(44)

-

4,892

-

4,693

Interest expense, net

(10,678)

(3,012)

(2,690)

(1)

-

(16,381)

Net income(loss)

23,920

9,868

11,074

4,890

-

49,752

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax

-

-

-

-

(13,883)

(13,883)

Net income (loss) attributable to MGE

$23,920

$9,868

$ 11,074

$4,890

$(13,883)

$35,869

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2008

 

$345,962

$242,598

$7,433

$-

$-

$595,993

Interdepartmental revenues

541

21,511

14,878

-

(36,930)

-

Total operating revenues (loss)

346,503

264,109

22,311

-

(36,930)

595,993

Depreciation and amortization

(27,354)

(9,175)

(2,744)

-

-

(39,273)

Other operating expenses*

(282,395)

(240,953)

(6,857)

(1)

36,930

(493,276)

Operating income (loss)*

36,754

13,981

12,710

(1)

-

63,444

Other (deductions) income, net*

(32)

(1,041)

-

4,327

-

3,254

Interest expense, net

(11,026)

(3,156)

(2,639)

-

-

(16,821)

Net income (loss)

25,696

9,784

10,071

4,326

-

49,877

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax

-

-

-

-

(12,304)

(12,304)

Net income (loss) attributable to MGE

$25,696

$9,784

$ 10,071

$4,326

$(12,304)

$37,573

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2007

 

$334,488

$197,925

$5,181

$-

$-

$537,594

Interdepartmental revenues

506

21,134

14,858

-

(36,498)

-

Total operating revenues (loss)

334,994

219,059

20,039

-

(36,498)

537,594

Depreciation and amortization

(20,994)

(8,527)

(2,678)

-

-

(32,199)

Other operating expenses*

(275,652)

(201,038)

(6,025)

(2)

36,498

(446,219)

Operating income (loss)*

38,348

9,494

11,336

(2)

-

59,176

Other (deductions) income, net *

963

(636)

-

3,620

-

3,947

Interest expense, net

(9,860)

(2,962)

(2,509)

-

-

(15,331)

Net income (loss)

29,451

5,896

8,827

3,618

-

47,792

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax

-

-

-

-

(10,721)

(10,721)

Net income (loss) attributable to MGE

$29,451

$5,896

$8,827

$3,618

$(10,721)

$37,071


*Amounts are shown net of the related tax expense, consistent with the presentation on the consolidated MGE Income Statement.




114




The following table shows segment information for MGE Energy's and MGE's assets and capital expenditures:


 

 

Utility

 

Consolidated

(In thousands)

MGE Energy

Electric

Gas

Assets not

Allocated

 

Nonregulated

Energy

Transmission

Investment

All

Others

Consolidation/

Elimination

Entries

Total

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2009

$695,897

$249,610

$22,342

 

$292,101

$51,728

$389,744

$(419,537)

$1,281,885

December 31, 2008

677,540

284,211

14,642

 

271,568

46,292

381,433

(407,411)

1,268,275

December 31, 2007

614,949

234,002

14,876

 

227,415

40,808

342,491

(362,954)

1,111,587

Capital Expenditures:




 






Year ended Dec. 31, 2009

$37,014

$13,734

$-

 

$27,181

$-

$-

$-

$77,929

Year ended Dec. 31, 2008

47,033

8,441

 -

 

50,303

 -

 -

 -

105,777

Year ended Dec. 31, 2007

70,687

12,091

-

 

53,480

-

-

-

136,258


 

Utility

 

Consolidated

(In thousands)

MGE

Electric

Gas

Assets not

Allocated

 

Nonregulated

Energy

Transmission

Investment

Consolidation/

Elimination

Entries

Total

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2009

$695,897

$249,610

$22,342

 

$291,856

$51,728

$(37,878)

$1,273,555

December 31, 2008

677,540

284,211

14,642

 

271,318

46,292

(22,881)

1,271,122

December 31, 2007

614,949

234,002

14,876

 

227,165

40,808

(15,908)

1,115,892

Capital Expenditures:




 





Year ended Dec. 31, 2009

$37,014

$13,734

$-

 

$27,181

$-

$-

$77,929

Year ended Dec. 31, 2008

47,033

8,441

 -

 

50,303

 -

 -

105,777

Year ended Dec. 31, 2007

70,687

12,091

-

 

53,480

-

-

136,258


24.

Quarterly Summary of Operations - MGE Energy (unaudited).


(In thousands, except per-share amounts)


Quarters Ended

2009

March 31

 

June 30

 

September 30

 

December 31

Operating revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regulated electric revenues

$80,127

 

$ 81,198

 

$91,734

 

$79,265

Regulated gas revenues

98,820

 

24,033

 

15,144

 

54,337

Nonregulated revenues

2,197

 

2,325

 

2,419

 

2,220

Total

181,144

 

107,556

 

109,297

 

135,822

Operating expenses

156,808

 

90,882

 

88,188

 

113,276

Operating income

24,336

 

16,674

 

21,109

 

22,546

Interest and other income, net

(1,410)

 

(1,332)

 

(1,413)

 

(1,343)

Income tax provision

(7,974)

 

(5,449)

 

(6,974)

 

(7,773)

Earnings on common stock

$14,952

 

$9,893

 

$ 12,722

 

$13,430

Earnings per common share

$0.65

 

$0.43

 

$0.55

 

$0.58

Dividends per share

$0.362

 

$0.362

 

$0.368

 

$0.368

2008


 


 


 


Operating revenues:


 


 


 


Regulated electric revenues

$82,439

 

$84,031

 

$99,177

 

$80,315

Regulated gas revenues

105,484

 

38,920

 

24,843

 

73,351

Nonregulated revenues

2,073

 

1,786

 

1,787

 

1,787

Total

189,996

 

124,737

 

125,807

 

155,453

Operating expenses

165,688

 

106,495

 

100,556

 

135,472

Operating income

24,308

 

18,242

 

25,251

 

19,981

Interest and other income, net

(2,857)

 

(1,745)

 

1,781

 

(3,137)

Income tax provision

(7,614)

 

(5,940)

 

(9,722)

 

(5,780)

Earnings on common stock

$13,837

 

$10,557

 

$17,310

 

$11,064

Earnings per common share

$0.63

 

$0.48

 

$0.78

 

$0.49

Dividends per share

$0.355

 

$0.355

 

$0.362

 

$0.362


Notes:


·

The quarterly results of operations within a year may not be comparable because of seasonal and other factors.


·

The sum of earnings per share of common stock for any four quarters may vary slightly from the earnings per share of common stock for the equivalent twelve-month period due to rounding.


·

MGE Energy's operations are based primarily on its utility subsidiary MGE.




115




25.

Related Party Transactions - MGE Energy and MGE.


ATC


During 2009, 2008, and 2007, MGE recorded $22.7 million, $21.9 million, and $18.7 million, respectively for transmission services received from ATC. MGE also provides a variety of operational, maintenance, and project management work for ATC, which is reimbursed by ATC. For each of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, MGE had a receivable due from ATC of $0.1 million, $0.2 million, and $0.1 million, respectively.


WEPCO and ATC entered into an interconnection agreement related to transmission system upgrades for the Elm Road project, in which MGE Power Elm Road has an undivided 8.33% ownership interest. At December 31, 2008, MGE Power Elm Road had a receivable from ATC totaling $3.2 million, related to the work done by ATC on the Elm Road interconnection project. The full $3.2 million receivable was satisfied during 2009. No outstanding balance from ATC was due at December 31, 2009.


For additional discussion on MGE's relationship with ATC, see Footnote 4.


26.

Subsequent Events- MGE Energy and MGE.


The Company has evaluated subsequent events, including all events on or before February 25, 2010, which corresponds to the financial statement issuance date.


a.

 Elm Road Financing.


On February 4, 2010, MGE Power Elm Road, a wholly-owned subsidiary of MGE Energy, issued $50 million in principal amount of its 5.04% senior secured notes, due February 3, 2040.


b.

ATC Capital Contribution.


On January 29, 2010, MGE Transco made a voluntary $0.5 million capital contribution to ATC.



116





Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.


MGE Energy and MGE


None.


Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.


MGE Energy and MGE


Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures


During the fourth quarter of 2009, each registrant's management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated its disclosure controls and procedures related to the recording, processing, summarization, and reporting of information in its periodic reports that it files with the SEC. These disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to ensure that material information relating to that registrant, including its subsidiaries, is accumulated and made known to that registrant's management, including its principal executive officer and its principal executive financial officer, by other employees of that registrant and its subsidiaries as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and that this information is recorded, processed, summarized, evaluated, and reported, as applicable, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Due to the inherent limitations of control systems, not all misstatements may be detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty and breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. Also, the registrants do not control or manage certain of their unconsolidated entities, and thus, their access and ability to apply their procedures to those entities is more limited than is the case for their consolidated subsidiaries.


As of December 31, 2009, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of each registrant concluded that such registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) were effective to accomplish their objectives. Each registrant intends to continually strive to improve its disclosure controls and procedures to enhance the quality of its financial reporting.


During the quarter ended December 31, 2009, there were no changes in MGE Energy or MGE's internal controls over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, MGE Energy or MGE's internal control over financial reporting.


MGE Energy and MGE


Management of MGE Energy and MGE are required to assess and report on the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. As a result of that assessment, management determined that there were no material weaknesses as of December 31, 2009 and, therefore, concluded that MGE Energy and MGE's internal control over financial reporting was effective. Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting is included in Item 8. - Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.


Item 9B. Other Information.


MGE Energy


None.




117




PART III.


Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance.


MGE Energy


The information required by Item 10 relating to directors and nominees for election as directors at MGE Energy's annual meeting of shareholders is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the heading "ELECTION OF DIRECTORS" in MGE Energy's definitive proxy statement (2010 Proxy Statement) to be filed with the SEC on or before March 24, 2010. Information relating to compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the heading "BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP - Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in the 2010 Proxy Statement.


The information required by Item 10 relating to executive officers is set forth above in Item 1. Business - Executive Officers of the Registrants.


Code of Ethics


MGE Energy has adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to its directors and all of its employees, including its chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and principal accounting officer. The Code of Ethics is available on MGE Energy's website at www.mgeenergy.com.


Item 11. Executive Compensation.


See Item 12.


Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.


MGE Energy


The required information for Items 11 and 12 is included in the 2010 Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC on or before March 24, 2010, under the section "EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION," not including "Compensation Committee Report," and "Company Performance," and under the section "BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP," which is incorporated herein by reference.


MGE Energy does not have or maintain any equity compensation plans.


Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.


MGE Energy


The information required by Item 13 is incorporated by reference herein from the "BOARD OF DIRECTORS INFORMATION" section in the 2010 Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC on or before March 24, 2010.




118




Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.


MGE Energy


The information required by Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the heading "RATIFICATION OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM" in the 2010 Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC on or before March 24, 2010.


MGE


Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees Disclosure


 

2009

 

2008

Audit Fees:

 

 

 

Audit of financial statements and internal controls

$649,771

 

$659,554

Review of SEC filings and comfort letters

3,195

 

-

Total Audit Fees

$652,966

 

$659,554

 


 


Audit-Related Fees:


 


Services rendered for utility commission-mandated obligations


$10,500

 


$12,387

Total Audit-Related Fees

$10,500

 

$12,387

 


 


Tax Fees:


 


Services rendered to change tax method of

accounting for repairs


$96,641

 


$-

Review of federal and state income tax returns

29,730

 

28,246

Total Tax Fees

$126,371

 

$28,246

 


 


All Other Fees:


 


Fee to access online accounting standards library

$3,000

 

$3,000

Financial analysis for generation projects

-

 

93,400

Total All Other Fees

$3,000

 

$96,400


MGE is a wholly owned subsidiary of MGE Energy and does not have a separate audit committee. Instead, that function is fulfilled for MGE by the MGE Energy Audit Committee. The Audit Committee approves each engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm to render any audit or nonaudit services before the firm is engaged to render those services. The Chair of the Audit Committee or other designated Audit Committee member may represent the entire Audit Committee for purposes of this approval. Any services approved by the Chair or other designated Audit Committee member are reported to the full Audit Committee at the next scheduled Audit Committee meeting. No de minimis exceptions to this approval process are allowed under the Audit Committee Charter; and thus, none of the services described in the preceding table were approved pursuant to Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X.




119




PART IV.


Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.


(a) 1. Financial Statements.


 

 

MGE Energy

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

58

Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007

60

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007

61

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008

62

Consolidated Statements of Capitalization as of December 31, 2009 and 2008

63

Consolidated Statements of Common Equity and Comprehensive Income as of December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007

64

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

70

 

 

MGE

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

59

Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007

65

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007

66

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008

67

Consolidated Capitalization Statement as of December 31, 2009 and 2008

68

Consolidated Statements of Common Equity and Comprehensive Income as of December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007

69

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

70


2.

Financial Statement Schedule.


Schedule I – Condensed Parent Company Financial Statements.

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for MGE Energy, Inc. and Madison Gas and Electric Company.


All other schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or not required, or because the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.


3.

All Exhibits Including Those Incorporated by Reference.


Exhibits. Certain of the following exhibits are incorporated herein by reference under Rule 12b-32 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as indicated by the parenthetical reference. Certain other instruments which would otherwise be required to be listed below have not been so listed because such instruments do not authorize securities in an amount which exceeds 10% of the total assets of the applicable registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis and the relevant registrant agrees to furnish a copy of any such instrument to the Commission upon request. An asterisk (*) indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.


3.1

Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of MGE Energy, Inc. (Exhibit 3.1 to MGE Energy's Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration No. 333-72694.)


3.2

Amended and Restated Bylaws of MGE Energy, Inc. (Exhibit 3.2 to MGE Energy's Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration No. 333-72694.)


3.3

Restated Articles of Incorporation of Madison Gas and Electric Company as in effect at May 6, 1996. (Exhibit 3.(i) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1996, File No. 0-1125.)


3.4

Amended Bylaws of Madison Gas and Electric Company as in effect at August 16, 2002. (Exhibit 3.4 to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2002, File No. 0-1125.)


4.1

Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust between Madison Gas and Electric Company and Firstar Trust Company (successor to First Wisconsin Trust Company), as Trustee, dated as of January 1, 1946. (Exhibit 7-D to Registration Statement, Registration No. 2-6059.)




120




4.2

Supplemental Indenture to aforementioned indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust.


Supplemental Indenture

 

Dated as of

 

Exhibit No.

 

SEC File No.

Seventeenth

 

February 1, 1993

 

4F

 

Form 10-K for year ended

December 31, 1992,

File No. 0-1125


4.3

Indenture between MGE and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (as successor to Bank One, N.A.), as Trustee, dated as of September 1, 1998. (Exhibit 4B to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1999, File No. 0-1125.)


10.1

Credit Agreement dated as of December 21, 2005, among MGE Energy, the Lenders party thereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. (Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, File No. 0-49965.)


10.2

First Amendment dated as of April 25, 2006, to Credit Agreement dated as of December 21, 2005, among MGE Energy, the Lenders party thereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, File No. 0-49965.)


10.3

Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 21, 2005, among Madison Gas and Electric Company, the Lenders party thereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. (Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, File No. 0-1125.)


10.4

Credit Agreement dated as of August 29, 2008 among MGE Energy, Inc., as Borrower, the lenders named therein, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K dated August 29, 2008, File No. 0-49965.)


10.5

First Amendment dated as of August 28, 2009, to Credit Agreement dated as of December 30, 2008, among MGE Energy, Inc., as Borrower, the lenders named therein, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated August 28, 2009, File No. 0-49965.)


10.6

Agreement dated August 29, 2008, between Madison Gas and Electric Company, as Borrower, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Lender. (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated August 29, 2008, File No. 0-1125.)


10.7

First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of March 31, 2009, between Madison Gas and Electric Company, as Borrower, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Lender. (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated March 31, 2009, File No. 0-1125.)


10.8

Copy of Joint Power Supply Agreement with Wisconsin Power and Light Company and Wisconsin Public Service Corporation dated February 2, 1967. (Exhibit 4.09 to Registration Statement, Registration No. 2-27308.)


10.9

Copy of Joint Power Supply Agreement (Exclusive of Exhibits) with Wisconsin Power and Light Company and Wisconsin Public Service Corporation dated July 26, 1973, amending Exhibit 5.04. (Exhibit 5.04A to Registration Statement, Registration No. 2-48781.)


10.10

Copy of Amended and Restated Agreement for Construction and Operation of Columbia Generating Plant dated January 17, 2007. (Exhibit 10.9 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, File No. 0-1125.)


10.11

West Campus Cogeneration Facility Joint Ownership Agreement, dated as of October 13, 2003, among MGE Power West Campus, LLC, The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, and the State of Wisconsin, as Joint Owners. (Exhibit 10.19 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, File No. 0-1125.)


10.12

West Campus Cogeneration Facility Operation and Maintenance Agreement, dated as of October 13, 2003, among Madison Gas and Electric Company, as Operator, and the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, as Joint Owner. (Exhibit 10.20 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, File No. 0-1125.)




121




10.13

West Campus Cogeneration Facility Lease Agreement, dated as of March 18, 2004, among MGE Power West Campus, LLC, as Lessor, and Madison Gas and Electric Company, as Lessee. (Exhibit 10.21 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, File No. 0-1125.)


10.14

West Campus Cogeneration Facility Ground Lease, dated as of July 15, 2002, among MGE Power LLC, as Lessee, and the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, as Lessor. (Exhibit 10.22 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, File No. 0-1125.)


10.15

West Campus Cogeneration Facility Amendment of Ground Lease, dated as of March 18, 2004, among MGE Power West Campus, LLC as Lessee, and the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, as Lessor. (Exhibit 10.23 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, File No. 0-1125.)


10.16

West Campus Cogeneration Facility MGE Ground Sublease, dated as of March 18, 2004, among MGE Power West Campus, LLC as Lessee, and Madison Gas and Electric Company, as Lessor. (Exhibit 10.24 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, File No. 0-1125.)


10.17

Elm Road Generating Station Common Facilities Operating and Maintenance Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2004, among Madison Gas and Electric Company, Wisconsin Electric Power Company, and Wisconsin Public Power Inc., as Lessee/Owner Parties, and Wisconsin Electric Power Company, as Operating Agent. (Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, File No. 0-1125.)


10.18

Elm Road Generating Station New Common Facilities Ownership Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2004, among MGE Power Elm Road, LLC, Elm Road Generating Station Supercritical, LLC, and Wisconsin Public Power Inc., as Joint Owners. (Exhibit 10.8 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, File No. 0-1125.)


10.19

Elm Road Generating Station I Ownership Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2004, among MGE Power Elm Road, LLC, Elm Road Generating Station Supercritical, LLC, and Wisconsin Public Power Inc., as Joint Owners, Elm Road Services, LLC, as Project Manager, and W.E. Power LLC. (Exhibit 10.9 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, File No. 0-1125.)


10.20

Elm Road Generating Station I Facility Lease Agreement, dated as of November 4, 2005, among MGE Power Elm Road, LLC, as Lessor, and Madison Gas and Electric Company, as Lessee. (Exhibit 10.10 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, File No. 0-1125.)


10.21

Elm Road Generating Station I Operating and Maintenance Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2004, among Madison Gas and Electric Company, Wisconsin Electric Power Company, and Wisconsin Public Power Inc., as Lessee/ Owners, and Wisconsin Electric Power Company, as Operating Agent. (Exhibit 10.11 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, File No. 0-1125.)


10.22

Elm Road Generating Station I Easement and Indemnification Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2004, among MGE Power Elm Road, LLC and Wisconsin Public Power Inc., as Grantees, and Wisconsin Electric Power Company, as Grantor. (Exhibit 10.12 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, File No. 0-1125.)


10.23

Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of November 4, 2005 between MGE Power Elm Road, LLC and Madison Gas and Electric Company relating to Elm Road Generating Station I Easement and Indemnification Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2004, among MGE Power Elm Road, LLC and Wisconsin Public Power Inc., as Grantees, and Wisconsin Electric Power Company, as Grantor. (Exhibit 10.16 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, File No. 0-1125.)


10.24

Elm Road Generating Station II Ownership Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2004, among MGE Power Elm Road, LLC, Elm Road Generating Station Supercritical, LLC, and Wisconsin Public Power Inc., as Joint Owners, Elm Road Services, LLC, as Project Manager, and W.E. Power LLC. (Exhibit 10.13 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, File No. 0-1125.)




122




10.25

Elm Road Generating Station II Facility Lease Agreement, dated as of November 4, 2005, among MGE Power Elm Road, LLC, as Lessor, and Madison Gas and Electric Company, as Lessee. (Exhibit 10.14 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, File No. 0-1125.)


10.26

Elm Road Generating Station II Operating and Maintenance Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2004, among Madison Gas and Electric Company, Wisconsin Electric Power Company, and Wisconsin Public Power Inc., as Lessee/ Owners, and Wisconsin Electric Power Company, as Operating Agent. (Exhibit 10.15 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, File No. 0-1125.)


10.27

Elm Road Generating Station II Easement and Indemnification Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2004, among MGE Power Elm Road, LLC and Wisconsin Public Power Inc., as Grantees, and Wisconsin Electric Power Company, as Grantor. (Exhibit 10.16 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, File No. 0-1125.)


10.28

Operating Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2005, among MGE Energy LLC, Madison Gas and Electric Company, and MGE Transco Investment LLC. (Exhibit 10.17 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, File No. 0-1125.)


10.29

Warranty Agreement to the Wind Turbine Supply Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2006, among Madison Gas and Electric Company as Buyer and Vestas-American Wind Technology, Inc. As Supplier. (Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, File No. 0-1125.)


10.30

Service and Maintenance Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2006, among Madison Gas and Electric Company as Buyer and Vestas-American Wind Technology, Inc. As Supplier. (Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, File No. 0-1125.)


10.31

Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2006, among Madison Gas and Electric Company as Buyer and Northern Iowa Windpower II LLC and Northern Iowa Windpower III LLC as Seller. (Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, File No. 0-1125.)


10.32

Substation and Transformer Shared Use Agreement and Easement Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2006, among Madison Gas and Electric Company and Northern Iowa Windpower II LLC as Joint Owners. (Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, File No. 0-1125.)


10.33

Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2009, among MAGAEL, LLC as Buyer, Bethel Wind Energy LLC as seller and Renewable Power Markets Access, Inc. as RPMA.


10.34

Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2009, among MAGAEL, LLC as Buyer, Wellsburg Wind Energy LLC as seller and Renewable Power Markets Access, Inc. as RPMA.


10.35

Management and Administration Agreement, dated as of October 13, 2006, among Madison Gas and Electric Company as Owner and Midwest Renewable Energy Resources, LLC as Manager. (Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, File No. 0-1125.)


10.36*

Form of Severance Agreement. (Exhibit 10.37 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, File No. 0-49965.)


10.37*

Form of Deferred Compensation Agreement. (Exhibit 10.38 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, File No. 0-49965.)


10.38*

Form of Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Agreement. (Exhibit 10.39 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, File No. 0-49965.)


10.39*

Form of Income Continuation Agreement. (Exhibit 10.40 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, File No. 0-49965.)


10.40*

MGE Energy, Inc., 2006 Performance Unit Plan. (Exhibit 10.41 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, File No. 0-49965.)




123




10.41*

Form of Performance Unit Award Agreement. (Exhibit 10.42 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, File No. 0-49965.)


12

Statements regarding computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges:

12.1

MGE Energy, Inc.

12.2

Madison Gas and Electric Company


21

Subsidiaries of MGE Energy, Inc.


23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

23.1

MGE Energy, Inc.

23.2

Madison Gas and Electric Company.


31

Certifications Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed by the following officers for the following companies:


31.1

Filed by Gary J. Wolter for MGE Energy, Inc.

31.2

Filed by Jeffrey C. Newman for MGE Energy, Inc.

31.3

Filed by Gary J. Wolter for Madison Gas and Electric Company

31.4

Filed by Jeffrey C. Newman for Madison Gas and Electric Company


32

Certifications Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code (Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) as to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed by the following officers for the following companies:


32.1

Filed by Gary J. Wolter for MGE Energy, Inc.

32.2

Filed by Jeffrey C. Newman for MGE Energy, Inc.

32.3

Filed by Gary J. Wolter for Madison Gas and Electric Company

32.4

Filed by Jeffrey C. Newman for Madison Gas and Electric Company




124




Schedule I

Condensed Parent Company Financial Statements



MGE Energy, Inc.

Statement of Income

(Parent Company Only)

(In thousands)


 

For the years ended December 31,

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

Operating Expenses:


 


 


Other operations and maintenance

$654

 

$416

 

$381

Total Operating Expenses

654

 

416

 

381

Operating Loss

(654)

 

(416)

 

(381)

 


 


 


Equity in earnings of investments

50,742

 

51,929

 

48,120

Other Income/(Loss), net

(56)

 

(25)

 

(39)

Interest on long-term debt

2,766

 

(2,058)

 

(1,772)

Other Interest

-

 

4,841

 

4,000

Income before income taxes

52,798

 

54,271

 

49,928

Income tax provision

(1,801)

 

(1,503)

 

(1,103)

Net Income

$ 50,997

 

$ 52,768

 

$48,825


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the above consolidated financial statements.


MGE Energy, Inc.

Statements of Cash Flows

(Parent Company Only)

(In thousands)

 

For the years ended December 31,

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

Net Cash Flows Provided by/(Used for) Operating Activities

$16,469

 

$(30,476)

 

$(17,444)

 


 


 


Investing Activities


 


 


 Return of investments - affiliates

3,297

 

617

 

-

 Other investing

(150)

 

(150)

 

(200)

Cash Provided by/(Used for) Investing Activities

3,147

 

467

 

(200)

 


 


 


Financing Activities:


 


 


Issuance of common stock, net

6,275

 

30,997

 

32,786

Cash dividends paid on common stock

(33,693)

 

(31,780)

 

(30,295)

Increase in long-term debt used to repay short-term debt

50,000

 

-

 

-

Change in short-term debt

(42,500)

 

31,000

 

15,000

Cash Provided by (Used for) Financing Activities

(19,918)

 

30,217

 

17,491

 


 


 


Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents:

(302)

 

208

 

(153)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

870

 

662

 

815

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$568

 

$870

 

$662


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the above consolidated financial statements.




125




Schedule I

Condensed Parent Company Financial Statements (continued)



MGE Energy, Inc.

Balance Sheets

(Parent Company Only)

(In thousands)


 

At December 31,

ASSETS

2009

 

2008

Current Assets:

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$568

 

$870

Accounts receivable, net:


 


Accounts receivable from affiliates

4,215

 

64

Prepaid taxes and other

11,408

 

6,978

Total Current Assets

16,191

 

7,912

Other deferred assets and other

88

 

66

 


 


Investments:


 


Investments in affiliates

576,165

 

552,570

 


 


Other

449

 

325

Total Investments

576,614

 

552,895

Total Assets

$592,893

 

$560,873

 


 


LIABILITIES AND CAPITALIZATION


 


Current Liabilities:


 


Long-term debt – due within one year

1,528

 

-

Short-term debt

31,000

 

73,500

Accounts payable to affiliates

2,551

 

2,542

Other current liabilities

210

 

32

Total Current Liabilities

35,289

 

76,074

 


 


Other Credits:


 


Deferred income taxes

1,365

 

164

Accounts payable to affiliates

5,972

 

6,433

Total Other Credits

7,337

 

6,597

 


 


Capitalization:


 


Common shareholders' equity

339,382

 

333,107

Retained Income

162,208

 

144,904

Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)

205

 

191

Long-term debt

48,472

 

-

Total Capitalization

550,267

 

478,202

Commitments and contingencies (see Footnote 18)

-

 

-

 


 


Total Liabilities and Capitalization

$592,893

 

$560,873


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the above consolidated financial statements.




126




Schedule I

Condensed Parent Company Financial Statements (continued)



Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

(Parent Company Only)


1.

Basis of Presentation.


MGE Energy is a holding company and conducts substantially all of its business operations through its subsidiaries. For Parent Company only presentation, investment in subsidiaries are accounted for using the equity method. These condensed Parent Company financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with Rule 12-04, Schedule I of Regulation S-X. These statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes of the 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.


2.

Credit Agreements.


Credit Agreements

As of December 31, 2009, MGE Energy had access to unsecured credit facilities with aggregate bank commitments of $120 million and available capacity under those commitments of $39 million.


See Footnote 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding MGE Energy's debt and credit agreements.


3.

Commitments and Contingencies.


See Footnote 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for commitments and contingencies.


4.

Dividend from Affiliates.

 

(In thousands)

Dividend from Affiliates

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

CWDC

$-

 

$953


$-

MGE

19,318

 

-


15,621

MGE Construct

4,915

 

-


-

MGE Power West Campus

9,150

 

12,000


12,000

MGE Transco

1,795

 

917


657

Total

$35,178

 

$13,870


$28,278


Dividend Restrictions

Dividend payments by MGE to MGE Energy are subject to restrictions arising under a PSCW rate order and, to a lesser degree, MGE's first mortgage bonds. The PSCW order limits the amount of dividends that MGE may pay MGE Energy when its common equity ratio, calculated in the manner used in the rate proceeding, is less than 55%. Under those circumstances, MGE may not pay dividends in excess of $31.4 million and $26.8 million for 2009 and 2008, respectively, plus dividends on shares issued in excess of the shares issued in the rate proceeding forecast if the proceeds are invested in MGE. MGE's thirteen month rolling average common equity ratio at December 31, 2009 and 2008, is estimated to be 57.5% and 50.4%, respectively, as determined under the calculation used in the rate proceeding. While MGE was not restricted from paying cash dividends in 2009, in order to build additional common stock equity in MGE, $19.3 million cash dividends were paid to MGE Energy and no cash dividends were paid to MGE Energy in 2008. The rate proceeding calculation includes as indebtedness imputed amounts for MGE's outstanding purchase power capacity payments and other PSCW adjustments, but does not include the indebtedness associated with MGE Power West Campus, which is consolidated into MGE's financial statements and will not include the indebtedness associated with MGE Power Elm Road, which will be consolidated into MGE's financial Statements and will not include the indebtedness associated with MGE Power Elm Road, which will be consolidated into MGE's financial statements.




127




Schedule I

Condensed Parent Company Financial Statements (continued)



MGE has covenanted with the holders of its first mortgage bonds not to declare or pay any dividend or make any other distribution on or purchase any shares of its common stock unless, after giving effect thereto, the aggregate amount of all such dividends and distributions and all amounts applied to such purchases, after December 31, 1945, shall not exceed the earned surplus (retained earnings) accumulated subsequent to December 31, 1945. As of December 31, 2009, approximately $229.0 million was available for the payment of dividends under this covenant.




Schedule II

MGE Energy, Inc., and Madison Gas and Electric Company

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts


 

 

 

Additions

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at

beginning of

period

 

(1)

Charged to

costs and

expenses

(2)

Charged

to other

accounts

 

Net

Accounts

written

off

 

Balance at

end of

period

Fiscal Year 2007:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated provision for uncollectibles

$(3,596,527)

(3,122,611)

-

2,895,957

$(3,823,181)

 


 



 


 


Fiscal Year 2008:


 



 


 


Accumulated provision for uncollectibles

$(3,823,181)

(4,273,313)

(83,457)

3,904,052

$(4,275,899)

 


 



 


 


Fiscal Year 2009:


 



 


 


Accumulated provision for uncollectibles

$(4,275,899)

(3,409,313)

(48,946)

3,491,823

$(4,242,335)




128




Signatures - MGE Energy, Inc.



Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.


 

MGE Energy, Inc.

(Registrant)

 

 

Date: February 25, 2010

/s/ Gary J. Wolter

 

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on February 25, 2010.


/s/ Gary J. Wolter

Gary J. Wolter

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

/s/ Jeffrey C. Newman

Jeffrey C. Newman

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

/s/ Londa J. Dewey

Londa J. Dewey, Director

 

 

/s/ F. Curtis Hastings

F. Curtis Hastings, Director

 

 

/s/ Regina M. Millner

Regina M. Millner, Director

 

 

/s/ Frederic E. Mohs

Frederic E. Mohs, Director

 

 

/s/ John R. Nevin

John R. Nevin, Director

 

 

/s/ James L. Possin

James L. Possin, Director




/s/ Thomas R. Stolper

Thomas R. Stolper, Director

 

 

/s/ H. Lee Swanson

H. Lee Swanson, Director




129




Signatures - Madison Gas and Electric Company



Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.


 

Madison Gas and Electric Company

(Registrant)

 

 

Date: February 25, 2010

/s/ Gary J. Wolter

 

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on February 25, 2010.


/s/ Gary J. Wolter

Gary J. Wolter

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

/s/ Jeffrey C. Newman

Jeffrey C. Newman

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

/s/ Londa J. Dewey

Londa J. Dewey, Director

 

 

/s/ F. Curtis Hastings

F. Curtis Hastings, Director

 

 

/s/ Regina M. Millner

Regina M. Millner, Director

 

 

/s/ Frederic E. Mohs

Frederic E. Mohs, Director

 

 

/s/ John R. Nevin

John R. Nevin, Director

 

 

/s/ James L. Possin

James L. Possin, Director



/s/ Thomas R. Stolper

Thomas R. Stolper, Director

 

 

/s/ H. Lee Swanson

H. Lee Swanson, Director





130