1ST SOURCE CORP - FORM 10-K - February 19, 2010

Attached files

file	filename
EX-23 - EXHIBIT 23 - 1ST SOURCE CORP	ex23.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - 1ST SOURCE CORP	ex31_1.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - 1ST SOURCE CORP	ex31_2.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - 1ST SOURCE CORP	ex32_1.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - 1ST SOURCE CORP	ex32_2.htm
EX-99.2 - EXHIBIT 99.2 - 1ST SOURCE CORP	ex99_2.htm
EX-99.1 - EXHIBIT 99.1 - 1ST SOURCE CORP	ex99_1.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition from____________to____________

Commission file number 0-6233

1ST SOURCE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indiana		35-1068133
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

100 North Michigan Street
South Bend, Indiana		46601
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (574) 235-2000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Class	Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock — without par value	The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the proceeding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x

The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2009 was $235,847,079

The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of stock as of February 15, 2010:

Common Stock, without par value –– 24,283,209 shares

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the annual proxy statement for the 2010 annual meeting of shareholders to be held April 22, 2010, are incorporated by reference into Part III.

- 1 -

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I

Item 1.	Business	3
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	7
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	10
Item 2.	Properties	10
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	10
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	10


Part II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	11
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	12
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	12
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	26
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	27
	Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	27
	Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition	29
	Consolidated Statements of Income	30
	Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity	31
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow	32
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	33
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	55
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	55
Item 9B.	Other Information	56


Part III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	56
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	56
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneﬁcial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	56
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	56
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	56


Part IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	57
Signatures		58
Exhibit 23
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.2
Exhibit 99.1
Exhibit 99.2

- 2 -

Table of Contents

Part I

Item 1. Business.

1st Source Corporation

1st Source Corporation, an Indiana corporation incorporated in 1971, is a bank holding company headquartered in South Bend, Indiana that provides, through our subsidiaries (collectively referred to as "1st Source"), a broad array of financial products and services. 1st Source Bank ("Bank"), our banking subsidiary, offers commercial and consumer banking services, trust and investment management services, and insurance to individual and business clients through most of our 76 banking center locations in 17 counties in Indiana and Michigan. 1st Source Bank's Specialty Finance Group, with 23 locations nationwide, offers specialized financing services for new and used private and cargo aircraft, automobiles and light trucks for leasing and rental agencies, medium and heavy duty trucks, construction equipment, and environmental equipment. While concentrated in certain equipment types, we serve a diverse client base. We are not dependent upon any single industry or client. At December 31, 2009, we had consolidated total assets of $4.54 billion, loans and leases of $3.09 billion, deposits of $3.65 billion, and total shareholders’ equity of $570.32 million.

Our principal executive office is located at 100 North Michigan Street, South Bend, Indiana 46601 and our telephone number is 574 235-2000. Access to our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports is available, free of charge, at www.1stsource.com soon after the material is electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

1st Source Bank

1st Source Bank is a wholly owned subsidiary of 1st Source Corporation that offers a broad range of consumer and commercial banking services through its lending operations, retail branches, and fee based businesses.

Commercial, Agricultural, and Real Estate Loans — 1st Source Bank provides commercial, small business, agricultural, and real estate loans to primarily privately owned business clients mainly located within our regional market area. Loans are made for a wide variety of general corporate purposes, including financing for industrial and commercial properties, financing for equipment, inventories and accounts receivable, and acquisition financing. Other services include commercial leasing and cash management services.

Consumer Services — 1st Source Bank provides a full range of consumer banking services, including checking accounts, on-line banking including bill payment, telephone banking, savings programs, installment and real estate loans, home equity loans and lines of credit, drive-through and night deposit services, safe deposit facilities, automated teller machines, overdraft facilities, debit and credit card services, financial literacy seminars and brokerage services.

Trust Services — 1st Source Bank provides a wide range of trust, investment, agency, and custodial services for individual, corporate, and not-for-profit clients. These services include the administration of estates and personal trusts, as well as the management of investment accounts for individuals, employee benefit plans, and charitable foundations.

Specialty Finance Group Services — 1st Source Bank, through its Specialty Finance Group, provides a broad range of comprehensive equipment loan and lease finance products addressing the financing needs of a broad array of companies. This group can be broken down into five areas: auto and light trucks; environmental equipment; medium and heavy duty trucks; new and used aircraft; and construction equipment.

The auto and light truck division consists of financings to automobile rental and leasing companies, light truck rental and leasing companies, and special purpose vehicles. The auto and light truck finance receivables generally range from $100,000 to $14 million with fixed or variable interest rates and terms of one to five years.

Environmental equipment financing handles trash and recycling equipment for municipalities and private businesses as well as equipment for landfills. Receivables generally range from $50,000 to $4 million with fixed or variable interest rates and terms of one to seven years.

The medium and heavy duty truck division provides financing for highway tractors and trailers and delivery trucks to the commercial trucking industry. Medium and heavy duty truck finance receivables generally range from $500,000 to $9 million with fixed or variable interest rates and terms of three to seven years.

Aircraft financing consists of financings for new and used general aviation aircraft for private and corporate aircraft users, aircraft distributors and dealers, air charter operators, air cargo carriers, and other aircraft operators. We have selectively entered the business aircraft markets of Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Luxembourg, Mexico and Uruguay on a limited basis where desirable aircraft financing opportunities exist. Aircraft finance receivables generally range from $500,000 to $14 million with fixed or variable interest rates and terms of one to ten years.

Construction equipment financing includes financing of equipment (i.e., asphalt and concrete plants, bulldozers, excavators, cranes, and loaders, etc.) to the construction industry. Construction equipment finance receivables generally range from $100,000 to $14 million with fixed or variable interest rates and terms of three to seven years.

We also generate equipment rental income through the leasing of construction equipment, various trucks, and other equipment to clients through operating leases.

Specialty Finance Group Subsidiaries

The Specialty Finance Group also consists of separate wholly owned subsidiaries of 1st Source Bank which include: Michigan Transportation Finance Corporation, 1st Source Specialty Finance, Inc., SFG Aircraft, Inc., 1st Source Intermediate Holding, LLC, 1st Source Commercial Aircraft Leasing, Inc., and SFG Equipment Leasing Corporation I.

First National Bank, Valparaiso

First National Bank, Valparaiso (First National) was a wholly owned subsidiary of 1st Source Corporation that was acquired on May 31, 2007 for $134.19 million. On June 6, 2008, First National was merged with 1st Source Bank.

Trustcorp Mortgage Company

Trustcorp Mortgage Company (Trustcorp) is a mortgage banking company and is a wholly owned subsidiary of 1st Source Corporation. During 2007, its mortgage activity was merged with 1st Source Bank and the company is now inactive.

- 3 -

Table of Contents

1st Source Insurance, Inc.

1st Source Insurance, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of 1st Source Bank that provides insurance products and services to individuals and businesses covering corporate and personal property, casualty insurance, and individual and group health and life insurance. 1st Source Insurance, Inc. has seven offices.

1st Source Corporation Investment Advisors, Inc.

1st Source Corporation Investment Advisors, Inc. (Investment Advisors) is a wholly owned subsidiary of 1st Source Bank that provides investment advisory services to trust and investment clients of 1st Source Bank. Investment Advisorsis registered as an investment advisor with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisors Act of 1940. Investment Advisors serves strictly in an advisory capacity and, as such, does not hold any client securities.

Other Consolidated Subsidiaries

We have other subsidiaries that are not significant to the consolidated entity.

1st Source Capital Trust IV and 1st Source Master Trust

Our unconsolidated subsidiaries include 1st Source Capital Trust IV and 1st Source Master Trust. These subsidiaries were created for the purposes of issuing $30.00 million and $57.00 million of trust preferred securities, respectively, and lending the proceeds to 1st Source. We guarantee, on a limited basis, payments of distributions on the trust preferred securities and payments on redemption of the trust preferred securities. 1st Source Capital Trust II and 1st Source Capital Trust III were dissolved during 2008.

Competition

The activities in which we and the Bank engage in are highly competitive. Our businesses and the geographic markets we serve require us to compete with other banks, some of which are affiliated with large bank holding companies headquartered outside of our principal market. We generally compete on the basis of client service and responsiveness to client needs, available loan and deposit products, the rates of interest charged on loans and leases, the rates of interest paid for funds, other credit and service charges, the quality of services rendered, the convenience of banking facilities, and in the case of loans and leases to large commercial borrowers, relative lending limits.

In addition to competing with other banks within our primary service areas, the Bank also competes with other financial service companies, such as credit unions, industrial loan associations, securities firms, insurance companies, small loan companies, finance companies, mortgage companies, real estate investment trusts, certain governmental agencies, credit organizations, and other enterprises.

Additional competition for depositors’ funds comes from United States Government securities, private issuers of debt obligations, and suppliers of other investment alternatives for depositors. Many of our non-bank competitors are not subject to the same extensive Federal regulations that govern bank holding companies and banks. Such non-bank competitors may, as a result, have certain advantages over us in providing some services.

We compete against these financial institutions by being convenient to do business with, and by taking the time to listen and understand our clients' needs. We deliver personalized, one on one banking through knowledgeable local members of the community, offering a full array of products and highly personalized services. We rely on our history and our reputation in northern Indiana dating back to 1863.

Employees

At December 31, 2009, we had approximately 1,170 employees on a full-time equivalent basis. We provide a wide range of employee benefits and consider employee relations to be good.

Regulation and Supervision

General — 1st Source and the Bank are extensively regulated under Federal and State law. To the extent that the following information describes statutory or regulatory provisions, it is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory and regulatory provisions. Any change in applicable laws or regulations may have a material effect on our business and our prospective business. Our operations may be affected by legislative changes and by the policies of various regulatory authorities. We are unable to predict the nature or the extent of the effects on our business and earnings that fiscal or monetary policies, economic controls, or new Federal or State legislation may have in the future.

We are a registered bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (BHCA) and, as such, we are subject to regulation, supervision, and examination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve). We are required to file annual reports with the Federal Reserve and to provide the Federal Reserve such additional information as it may require.

1st Source Bank, as an Indiana state bank and member of the Federal Reserve System, is supervised by the Indiana Department of Financial Institutions (DFI) and the Federal Reserve. As such, 1st Source Bank is regularly examined by and subject to regulations promulgated by the DFI and the Federal Reserve. Because the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) provides deposit insurance to 1st Source Bank, we are also subject to supervision and regulation by the FDIC (even though the FDIC is not our primary Federal regulator).

Bank Holding Company Act — Under the BHCA, as amended, our activities are limited to business so closely related to banking, managing, or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. We are also subject to capital requirements applied on a consolidated basis in a form substantially similar to those required of the Bank. The BHCA also requires a bank holding company to obtain approval from the Federal Reserve before (i) acquiring, or holding more than 5% voting interest in any bank or bank holding company, (ii) acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of another bank or bank holding company, or (iii) merging or consolidating with another bank holding company.

The BHCA also restricts non-bank activities to those which, by statute or by Federal Reserve regulation or order, have been identified as activities closely related to the business of banking or of managing or controlling banks. As discussed below, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which was enacted in 1999, established a new type of bank holding company known as a "financial holding company" that has powers that are not otherwise available to bank holding companies.

Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 — The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA) reorganized and reformed the regulatory structure applicable to financial institutions generally.

- 4 -

Table of Contents

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 — The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA) was adopted to supervise and regulate a wide variety of banking issues. In general, FDICIA provides for the recapitalization of the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF), deposit insurance reform, including the implementation of risk-based deposit insurance premiums, the establishment of five capital levels for financial institutions ("well capitalized," "adequately capitalized," "undercapitalized," "significantly undercapitalized," and "critically undercapitalized") that would impose more scrutiny and restrictions on less capitalized institutions, along with a number of other supervisory and regulatory issues. At December 31, 2009, the Bank was categorized as "well capitalized," meaning that our total risk-based capital ratio exceeded 10.00%, our Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio exceeded 6.00%, our leverage ratio exceeded 5.00%, and we are not subject to a regulatory order, agreement, or directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure.

Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act — On February 1, 2006, Congress approved the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 (FDIRA). Among other things, the FDIRA provides for the merger of the Bank Insurance Fund with the Savings Association Insurance Fund and for an immediate increase in Federal deposit insurance for certain retirement accounts up to $250,000. The statute further provides for the indexing of the maximum deposit insurance coverage for all types of deposit accounts in the future to account for inflation. The FDIRA also requires the FDIC to provide certain banks and thrifts that were in existence prior to December 31, 1996 with one-time credits against future premiums based on the amount of their payments to the Bank Insurance Fund or Savings Association Insurance Fund prior to that date.

FDIC Deposit Insurance Assessments — On October 16, 2008, in response to the problems facing the financial markets and the economy, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation published a restoration plan (Restoration Plan) designed to replenish the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) such that the reserve ratio would return to 1.15 percent within five years. On December 16, 2008, the FDIC adopted a final rule increasing risk-based assessment rates uniformly by seven basis points, on an annual basis, for the first quarter 2009.

On February 27, 2009, the FDIC concluded that the problems facing the financial services sector and the economy at large constituted extraordinary circumstances and amended the Restoration Plan and extended the time within which the reserve ratio would return to 1.15 percent from five to seven years (Amended Restoration Plan). In May 2009, Congress amended the statutory provision governing establishment and implementation of a Restoration Plan to allow the FDIC eight years to bring the reserve ratio back to 1.15 percent, absent extraordinary circumstances.

On May 22, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule imposing a five basis point special assessment on each insured depository institution's assets minus Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009. The special assessment was collected on September 30, 2009.

In a final rule issued on September 29, 2009, the FDIC amended the Amended Restoration Plan as follows:

·	The period of the Amended Restoration Plan was extended from seven to eight years.

·	The FDIC announced that it will not impose any further special assessments under the final rule it adopted in May 2009.

The FDIC announced plans to maintain assessment rates at their current levels through the end of 2010. The FDIC also immediately adopted a uniform three basis point increase in assessment rates effective January 1, 2011 to ensure that the DIF returns to 1.15 percent within the Amended Restoration Plan period of eight years.

The FDIC announced that, at least semi-annually following the adoption of the Amended Restoration Plan, it will update its loss and income projections for the DIF. The FDIC also announced that it may, if necessary, adopt a new rule prior to the end of the eight-year period to increase assessment rates in order to return the reserve ratio to 1.15 percent.

On November 12, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule to require insured institutions to prepay their quarterly risk-based deposit insurance assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009, and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012, on December 30, 2009. Our payment was $20.26 million.

Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program — On November 21, 2008, the FDIC Board of Directors adopted a final rule implementing the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP). The TLGP consists of two basic components: a guarantee of newly issued senior unsecured debt of banks, thrifts, and certain holding companies (the debt guarantee program) and full guarantee of non-interest bearing deposit transaction accounts, such as business payroll accounts, regardless of dollar amount (the transaction account guarantee program). The purpose of the guarantee of transaction accounts and the debt guarantee is to reduce funding costs and allow banks and thrifts to increase lending to consumers and businesses. All insured depository institutions were automatically enrolled in both programs unless they elected to opt out by a specified date. 1st Source did not elect to opt out and thus participates in both programs. On March 17, 2009, the FDIC extended the debt guarantee portion of the TLGP from June 30, 2009 to October 31, 2009 and imposed a surcharge on debt issued with a maturity of one year or more beginning in the second quarter to gradually phase out the program. The transaction account guarantee program is in effect until June 30, 2010.

Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 — On October 3, 2008, President George W. Bush signed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA). This Act temporarily raises the basic limit on federal deposit insurance coverage from $100,000 to $250,000 per depositor effective immediately. This temporary increase in the deposit insurance limit expires on December 31, 2013.

Under the Troubled Asset Relief Program established by EESA, the U.S. Treasury Department announced a Capital Purchase Program (CPP). CPP is designed to encourage U.S. financial institutions to build capital to increase the flow of financing to U.S. businesses and consumers and support the U.S. economy. Under the program, Treasury will purchase up to $250 billion of senior preferred shares on standardized terms as described in the program's term sheet. The program is available to qualifying U.S. controlled banks, savings associations, and certain bank and savings and loan holding companies engaged only in financial activities that elect submitted applications to Treasury by November 14, 2008. EESA provides for Treasury to determine an applicant’s eligibility to participate in the CPP after consulting with the appropriate federal banking agency.

1st Source submitted an application to participate in the CPP and obtained Treasury approval on December 11, 2008. On January 23, 2009, 1st Source issued preferred stock valued at $111.00 million and a warrant to acquire 837,947 shares of its common stock to Treasury pursuant to the CPP. The warrant is exercisable at any time during the ten-year period following issuance at an exercise price of $19.87.

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and The Nasdaq Stock Market (Nasdaq) — We are under the jurisdiction of the SEC and certain state securities commissions for matters relating to the offering and sale of our securities and our investment advisory services. We are subject to the disclosure and regulatory requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as administered by the SEC. We are listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the trading symbol "SRCE," and we are subject to the rules of Nasdaq for listed companies.

- 5 -

Table of Contents

Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 — Congress enacted the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (Interstate Act) in September 1994. Beginning in September 1995, bank holding companies have the right to expand, by acquiring existing banks, into all states, even those which had theretofore restricted entry. The legislation also provides that, subject to future action by individual states, a holding company has the right to convert the banks which it owns in different states to branches of a single bank. The states of Indiana and Michigan have adopted the interstate branching provisions of the Interstate Act.

Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996 — The Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996 (EGRPRA) was signed into law on September 30, 1996. Among other things, EGRPRA streamlined the non-banking activities application process for well-capitalized and well-managed bank holding companies.

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 — The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA) is intended to modernize the banking industry by removing barriers to affiliation among banks, insurance companies, the securities industry, and other financial service providers. It provides financial organizations with the flexibility of structuring such affiliations through a holding company structure or through a financial subsidiary of a bank, subject to certain limitations. The GLBA establishes a new type of bank holding company, known as a financial holding company, which may engage in an expanded list of activities that are "financial in nature," which include securities and insurance brokerage, securities underwriting, insurance underwriting, and merchant banking. The GLBA also sets forth a system of functional regulation that makes the Federal Reserve the "umbrella supervisor" for holding companies, while providing for the supervision of the holding company’s subsidiaries by other Federal and state agencies. A bank holding company may not become a financial holding company if any of its subsidiary financial institutions are not well-capitalized or well-managed. Further, each bank subsidiary of the holding company must have received at least a satisfactory Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) rating. The GLBA also expands the types of financial activities a national bank may conduct through a financial subsidiary, addresses state regulation of insurance, generally prohibits unitary thrift holding companies organized after May 4, 1999 from participating in new activities that are not financial in nature, provides privacy protection for nonpublic customer information of financial institutions, modernizes the Federal Home Loan Bank system, and makes miscellaneous regulatory improvements. The Federal Reserve and the Secretary of the Treasury must coordinate their supervision regarding approval of new financial activities to be conducted through a financial holding company or through a financial subsidiary of a bank. While the provisions of the GLBA regarding activities that may be conducted through a financial subsidiary directly apply only to national banks, those provisions indirectly apply to state-chartered banks. In addition, the Bank is subject to other provisions of the GLBA, including those relating to CRA and privacy, regardless of whether we elect to become a financial holding company or to conduct activities through a financial subsidiary. We do not, however, currently intend to file notice with the Board to become a financial holding company or to engage in expanded financial activities through a financial subsidiary.

Financial Privacy — In accordance with the GLBA, Federal banking regulators adopted rules that limit the ability of banks and other financial institutions to disclose non-public information about customers to nonaffiliated third parties. These limitations require disclosure of privacy policies to consumers and, in some circumstances, allow consumers to prevent disclosure of certain personal information to a nonaffiliated third party. The privacy provisions of the GLBA affect how consumer information is transmitted through diversified financial companies and conveyed to outside vendors.

USA Patriot Act of 2001 — The USA Patriot Act of 2001 (USA Patriot Act) was signed into law following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The USA Patriot Act is comprehensive anti-terrorism legislation that, among other things, substantially broadened the scope of anti-money laundering laws and regulations by imposing significant new compliance and due diligence obligations on financial institutions.

The regulations adopted by the United States Treasury Department under the USA Patriot Act impose new obligations on financial institutions to maintain appropriate policies, procedures and controls to detect, prevent and report money laundering, and terrorist financing. Additionally, the regulations require that we, upon request from the appropriate Federal regulatory agency, provide records related to anti-money laundering, perform due diligence of private banking and correspondent accounts, establish standards for verifying customer identity, and perform other related duties.

Failure of a financial institution to comply with the USA Patriot Act's requirements could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution.

Regulations Governing Capital Adequacy — The Federal bank regulatory agencies use capital adequacy guidelines in their examination and regulation of bank holding companies and banks. If capital falls below the minimum levels established by these guidelines, a bank holding company or bank will be required to submit an acceptable plan for achieving compliance with the capital guidelines and will be subject to denial of applications and appropriate supervisory enforcement actions. The various regulatory capital requirements that we are subject to are disclosed in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Our management believes that the risk-weighting of assets and the risk-based capital guidelines do not have a material adverse impact on our operations or on the operations of the Bank.

Community Reinvestment Act — The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 requires that, in connection with examinations of financial institutions within their jurisdiction, the Federal banking regulators must evaluate the record of the financial institutions in meeting the credit needs of their local communities, including low and moderate income neighborhoods, consistent with the safe and sound operation of those banks. Federal banking regulators are required to consider a financial institution's performance in these areas as they review applications filed by the institution to engage in mergers or acquisitions or to open a branch or facility.

Regulations Governing Extensions of Credit — 1st Source Bank is subject to certain restrictions imposed by the Federal Reserve Act on extensions of credit to 1st Source or our subsidiaries, or investments in our securities and on the use of our securities as collateral for loans to any borrowers. These regulations and restrictions may limit our ability to obtain funds from the Bank for our cash needs, including funds for acquisitions and for payment of dividends, interest and operating expenses. Further, the BHCA, certain regulations of the Federal Reserve, state laws and many other Federal laws govern the extensions of credit and generally prohibit a bank from extending credit, engaging in a lease or sale of property, or furnishing services to a customer on the condition that the customer obtain additional services from the bank’s holding company or from one of its subsidiaries.

1st Source Bank is also subject to certain restrictions imposed by the Federal Reserve Act on extensions of credit to executive officers, directors, principal shareholders, or any related interest of such persons. Extensions of credit (i) must be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, and subject to credit underwriting procedures that are at least as stringent as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non affiliates, and (ii) must not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features. The Bank is also subject to certain lending limits and restrictions on overdrafts to such persons.

- 6 -

Table of Contents

Reserve Requirements — The Federal Reserve requires all depository institutions to maintain reserves against their transaction account deposits. The Bank must maintain reserves of 3.00% against net transaction accounts greater than $10.70 million and up to $44.50 million (subject to adjustment by the Federal Reserve) and reserves of 10.00% must be maintained against that portion of net transaction accounts in excess of $44.50 million.

Dividends — The ability of the Bank to pay dividends is limited by state and Federal Regulations that require 1st Source Bank to obtain the prior approval of the DFI before paying a dividend that, together with other dividends it has paid during a calendar year, would exceed the sum of its retained net income for the year to date combined with its retained net income for the previous two years. The amount of dividends the Bank may pay may also be limited by certain covenant agreements and by the principles of prudent bank management. See Part II, Item 5, Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities for further discussion of dividend limitations.

Monetary Policy and Economic Control — The commercial banking business in which we engage is affected not only by general economic conditions, but also by the monetary policies of the Federal Reserve. Changes in the discount rate on member bank borrowing, availability of borrowing at the "discount window," open market operations, the imposition of changes in reserve requirements against member banks deposits and assets of foreign branches, and the imposition of, and changes in, reserve requirements against certain borrowings by banks and their affiliates are some of the instruments of monetary policy available to the Federal Reserve. These monetary policies are used in varying combinations to influence overall growth and distributions of bank loans, investments, and deposits, and such use may affect interest rates charged on loans and leases or paid on deposits. The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks and are expected to do so in the future. The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve are influenced by various factors, including inflation, unemployment, short-term and long-term changes in the international trade balance, and in the fiscal policies of the U.S. Government. Future monetary policies and the effect of such policies on our future business and earnings, and the effect on the future business and earnings of the Bank cannot be predicted.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 — On July 30, 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOA) was signed into law. The SOA's stated goals include enhancing corporate responsibility, increasing penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies and protecting investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures pursuant to the securities laws. The SOA generally applies to all companies that file or are required to file periodic reports with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act.)

Among other things, the SOA creates the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board as an independent body subject to SEC supervision with responsibility for setting auditing, quality control, and ethical standards for auditors of public companies. The SOA also requires public companies to make faster and more-extensive financial disclosures, requires the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer of public companies to provide signed certifications as to the accuracy and completeness of financial information filed with the SEC, and provides enhanced criminal and civil penalties for violations of the Federal securities laws.

The SOA also addresses functions and responsibilities of audit committees of public companies. The statute, by mandating certain stock exchange listing rules, makes the audit committee directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the work of the company's outside auditor, and requires the auditor to report directly to the audit committee. The SOA authorizes each audit committee to engage independent counsel and other advisors, and requires a public company to provide the appropriate funding, as determined by its audit committee, to pay the company's auditors and any advisors that its audit committee retains. The SOA also requires public companies to prepare an internal control report and assessment by management, along with an attestation to this report prepared by the company's registered public accounting firm, in their annual reports to stockholders.

Pending Legislation — Because of concerns relating to competitiveness and the safety and soundness of the banking industry, Congress often considers a number of wide-ranging proposals for altering the structure, regulation, and competitive relationships of the nation’s financial institutions. On December 11, 2009, the House of Representatives passed the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009 (H.R. 3996) that, among other things, would create a Consumer Financial Protection Agency, a new federal banking agency with the sole mission of protecting consumers when they borrow money, make deposits, or obtain other financial products and services. The bill also specifically targets systemic risk within the financial system, focusing primarily on the potential harm that regulatory gaps involving large, interconnected companies can pose to the economy. We cannot predict whether or in what form Congress may adopt final legislation incorporating the provisions of H.R. 3996, or whether it may adopt other legislation, or the extent to which our business may be affected thereby.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

An investment in our common stock is subject to risks inherent to our business. The material risks and uncertainties that we believe affect us are described below. See “Forward Looking Statements” under Item 7 of this report for a discussion of other important factors that can affect our business.

Fluctuations in interest rates could reduce our profitability and affect the value of our assets — Like other financial institutions, we are subject to interest rate risk. Our primary source of income is net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on loans and leases and investments, and interest paid on deposits and borrowings. We expect that we will periodically experience imbalances in the interest rate sensitivities of our assets and liabilities and the relationships of various interest rates to each other. Over any defined period of time, our interest-earning assets may be more sensitive to changes in market interest rates than our interest-bearing liabilities, or vice-versa. In addition, the individual market interest rates underlying our loan and lease and deposit products may not change to the same degree over a given time period. In any event, if market interest rates should move contrary to our position, earnings may be negatively affected. In addition, loan and lease volume and quality and deposit volume and mix can be affected by market interest rates as can the businesses of our clients. Changes in levels of market interest rates could have a material adverse affect on our net interest spread, asset quality, origination volume, and overall profitability.

Market interest rates are beyond our control, and they fluctuate in response to general economic conditions and the policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies, in particular, the Federal Reserve Board. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, may negatively affect our ability to originate loans and leases, the value of our assets and our ability to realize gains from the sale of our assets, all of which ultimately could affect our earnings.

- 7 -

Table of Contents

Future expansion involves risks — In the future, we may acquire all or part of other financial institutions and we may establish de novo branch offices. There could be considerable costs involved in executing our growth strategy. For instance, new branches generally require a period of time to generate sufficient revenues to offset their costs, especially in areas in which we do not have an established presence. Accordingly, any new branch expansion could be expected to negatively impact earnings for some period of time until the branch reaches certain economies of scale. Acquisitions and mergers involve a number of risks, including the risk that:

·	We may incur substantial costs identifying and evaluating potential acquisitions and merger partners, or in evaluating new markets, hiring experienced local managers, and opening new offices;

·	Our estimates and judgments used to evaluate credit, operations, management, and market risks relating to target institutions may not be accurate;

·	There may be substantial lag-time between completing an acquisition or opening a new office and generating sufficient assets and deposits to support costs of the expansion;

·	We may not be able to finance an acquisition, or the financing we obtain may have an adverse effect on our operating results or dilution of our existing shareholders;

·	The attention of our management in negotiating a transaction and integrating the operations and personnel of the combining businesses may be diverted from our existing business;

·	Acquisitions typically involve the payment of a premium over book and market values and; therefore, some dilution of our tangible book value and net income per common share may occur in connection with any future transaction;

·	We may enter new markets where we lack local experience;

·	We may incur goodwill in connection with an acquisition, or the goodwill we incur may become impaired, which results in adverse short-term effects on our operating results; or

·	We may lose key employees and clients.

Competition from other financial services providers could adversely impact our results of operations — The banking and financial services business is highly competitive. We face competition in making loans and leases, attracting deposits and providing insurance, investment, trust, and other financial services. Increased competition in the banking and financial services businesses may reduce our market share, impair our growth or cause the prices we charge for our services to decline. Our results of operations may be adversely impacted in future periods depending upon the level and nature of competition we encounter in our various market areas.

We are dependent upon the services of our management team — Our future success and profitability is substantially dependent upon our management and the banking abilities of our senior executives. We believe that our future results will also depend in part upon our ability to attract and retain highly skilled and qualified management. We are especially dependent on a limited number of key management personnel, many of whom do not have employment agreements with us. The loss of the chief executive officer and other senior management and key personnel could have a material adverse impact on our operations because other officers may not have the experience and expertise to readily replace these individuals. Many of these senior officers have primary contact with our clients and are important in maintaining personalized relationships with our client base. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of these key employees could have a material adverse effect on our operations and possibly result in reduced revenues if we were unable to find suitable replacements promptly. Competition for senior personnel is intense, and we may not be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel. Changes in key personnel and their responsibilities may be disruptive to our businesses and could have a material adverse effect on our businesses, financial condition, and results of operations.

Technology security breaches and constant technological change — Any compromise of our security also could deter our clients from using our internet banking services that involve the transmission of confidential information. We rely on standard internet security systems to provide the security and authentication necessary to effect secure transmission of data. These precautions may not protect our systems from compromises or breaches of our security measures that could result in damage to our reputation and business.

The financial services industry is constantly undergoing rapid technological change with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to better service clients and reduce costs. Our future success depends, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our clients by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy client demands, as well as create additional efficiencies within our operations. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to our clients. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological change affecting the financial services industry could have a material adverse impact on our business and, in turn, our financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to credit risks relating to our loan and lease portfolios — We have certain lending policies and procedures in place that are designed to optimize loan and lease income within an acceptable level of risk. Our management reviews and approves these policies and procedures on a regular basis. A reporting system supplements the review process by providing our management with frequent reports related to loan and lease production, loan quality, concentrations of credit, loan and lease delinquencies, and nonperforming and potential problem loans and leases. Diversification in the loan and lease portfolios is a means of managing risk associated with fluctuations and economic conditions.

We maintain an independent loan review department that reviews and validates the credit risk program on a periodic basis. Results of these reviews are presented to our management. The loan and lease review process complements and reinforces the risk identification and assessment decisions made by lenders and credit personnel, as well as our policies and procedures.

In the financial services industry, there is always a risk that certain borrowers may not repay borrowings. Our reserve for loan and lease losses may not be sufficient to cover the loan and lease losses that we may actually incur. If we experience defaults by borrowers in any of our businesses, our earnings could be negatively affected. Changes in local economic conditions could adversely affect credit quality, particularly in our local business loan and lease portfolio. Changes in national economic conditions could also adversely affect the quality of our loan and lease portfolio and negate, to some extent, the benefits of national diversification through our Specialty Finance Group’s portfolio.

- 8 -

Table of Contents

Commercial and commercial real estate loans generally involve higher credit risks than residential real estate and consumer loans. Because payments on loans secured by commercial real estate or equipment are often dependent upon the successful operation and management of the underlying assets, repayment of such loans may be influenced to a great extent by conditions in the market or the economy. We seek to minimize these risks through our underwriting standards. We obtain financial information and perform credit risk analysis on our customers. Credit criteria may include, but are not limited to, assessments of income, cash flows, and net worth; asset ownership; bank and trade credit reference; credit bureau report; and operational history.

Commercial real estate or equipment loans are underwritten after evaluating and understanding the borrower's ability to operate profitably and generate positive cash flows. Our management examines current and projected cash flows of the borrower to determine the ability of the borrower to repay their obligations as agreed. Underwriting standards are designed to promote relationship banking rather than transactional banking. Most commercial and industrial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets; however, some loans may be made on an unsecured basis. Our credit policy sets different maximum exposure limits both by business sector and our current and historical relationship and previous experience with each customer.

We offer both fixed-rate and adjustable-rate consumer mortgage loans secured by properties, substantially all of which are located in our primary market area. Adjustable-rate mortgage loans help reduce our exposure to changes in interest rates; however, during periods of rising interest rates, the risk of default on adjustable-rate mortgage loans may increase as a result of repricing and the increased payments required from the borrower. Additionally, most residential mortgages are sold into the secondary market and serviced by our principal banking subsidiary, 1st Source Bank.

Consumer loans are primarily all other non-real estate loans to individuals in our regional market area. Consumer loans can entail risk, particularly in the case of loans that are unsecured or secured by rapidly depreciating assets. In these cases, any repossessed collateral may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance. The remaining deficiency often does not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower beyond obtaining a deficiency judgment. In addition, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness, or personal bankruptcy.

The 1st Source Specialty Finance Group loan and lease portfolio consists of commercial loans and leases secured by construction and transportation equipment, including aircraft, autos, trucks, and vans. Finance receivables for this Group generally provide for monthly payments and may include prepayment penalty provisions.

Our construction and transportation related businesses could be adversely affected by slow downs in the economy. Clients who rely on the use of assets financed through the Specialty Finance Group to produce income could be negatively affected, and we could experience substantial loan and lease losses. By the nature of the businesses these clients operate in, we could be adversely affected by rapid increases of fuel costs. Since some of the relationships in these industries are large (up to $25 million), a slow down could have a significant adverse impact on our performance.

Our construction and transportation related businesses could be adversely impacted by the negative effects caused by high fuel costs, terrorist and other potential attacks, and other destabilizing events. These factors could contribute to the deterioration of the quality of our loan and lease portfolio, as they could have a negative impact on the travel sensitive businesses for which our specialty finance businesses provide financing.

In addition, our leasing and equipment financing activity is subject to the risk of cyclical downturns, industry concentration and clumping, and other adverse economic developments affecting these industries and markets. This area of lending, with transportation in particular, is dependent upon general economic conditions and the strength of the travel, construction, and transportation industries.

The soundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect us — Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, or other relationships. We have exposure to many different industries and counterparties, and we routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including commercial banks, brokers and dealers, investment banks, and other institutional clients. Many of these transactions expose us to credit risk in the event of a default by our counterparty or client. In addition, our credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by us cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the credit or derivative exposure due us. Any such losses could have a material adverse affect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Adverse changes in economic conditions could impair our financial condition and results of operations — We are impacted by general business and economic conditions in the United States and abroad. These conditions include short-term and long-term interest rates, inflation, money supply, political issues, legislative and regulatory changes, fluctuations in both debt and equity capital markets, broad trends in industry and finance, unemployment, and the strength of the U.S. economy and the local economies in which we operate, all of which are beyond our control. A deterioration in economic conditions could result in an increase in loan delinquencies and non-performing assets, decreases in loan collateral values and a decrease in demand for our products and services.

We are subject to extensive government regulation and supervision — Our operations are subject to extensive federal and state regulation and supervision. Banking regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors' funds, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole, not security holders. These regulations affect our lending practices, capital structure, investment practices, dividend policy and growth, among other things. Congress and federal regulatory agencies continually review banking laws, regulations and policies for possible change. Changes to statutes, regulations or regulatory policies, including changes in interpretation or implementation of statutes, regulation or policies, could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways. Such changes could subject us to additional costs and limit the types of financial services and products we may offer. Failure to comply with laws, regulations or policies could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies, civil money penalties and/or reputation damage, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. While we have policies and procedures designed to prevent any such violations, there can be no assurance that such violations will not occur.

We rely on dividends from our subsidiaries — Our parent company, 1st Source Corporation, receives substantially all of its revenue from dividends from our subsidiaries. These dividends are the principal source of funds to pay dividends on our common stock and interest and principal on our debt. Various federal and/or state laws and regulations limit the amount of dividends that our subsidiaries may pay to our parent company. In the event our subsidiaries are unable to pay dividends to our parent company, we may not be able to service debt, pay obligations or pay dividends on our common stock. The inability to receive dividends from our subsidiaries could have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

- 9 -

Table of Contents

Changes in accounting standards could impact reported earnings — Current accounting and tax rules, standards, policies and interpretations influence the methods by which financial institutions conduct business, implement strategic initiatives and tax compliance, and govern financial reporting and disclosures. These laws, regulations, rules, standards, policies and interpretations are constantly evolving and may change significantly over time. Events that may not have a direct impact on us, such as bankruptcy of major U.S. companies, have resulted in legislators, regulators, and authoritative bodies, such as the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and various taxing authorities, responding by adopting and/or proposing substantive revision to laws, regulations, rules, standards, policies and interpretations. New accounting pronouncements and varying interpretations of accounting pronouncements have occurred and may occur in the future. A change in accounting standards may adversely affect reported financial condition and results of operations.

New economic stabilization legislation and our participation in the programs could affect us adversely— The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the "EESA") is intended to stabilize and provide liquidity to the U.S. financial markets. There can be no assurance, however, as to the long term impact that the EESA and its regulations and other governmental programs will have on the financial markets. The failure of the financial markets to stabilize and a worsening of current financial market conditions could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The programs established or to be established under the EESA and Troubled Asset Relief Program may have adverse effects on us. We may face increased regulation of our industry. Compliance with such regulation may increase our costs and limit our ability to pursue business opportunities.

Our participation in the Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program may adversely affect the value of our common stock and the rights of our common shareholders — The terms of the preferred stock we issued under the Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program could reduce investment returns to our common shareholders by restricting dividends, diluting existing shareholders’ ownership interests, and restricting capital management practices. Without the prior consent of the Treasury, we will be prohibited from increasing our common stock dividends for the first three years while the Treasury holds the preferred stock.

Also, the preferred stock requires quarterly dividends to be paid at the rate of 5% per annum for the first five years and 9% per annum thereafter until the stock is redeemed by us. The payments of these dividends will decrease the excess cash we otherwise have available to pay dividends on our common stock and to use for general corporate purposes, including working capital.

Finally, we will be prohibited from continuing to pay dividends on our common stock unless we have fully paid all required dividends on the preferred stock issued to the Treasury. Although we fully expect to be able to pay all required dividends on the preferred stock (and to continue to pay dividends on its common stock at current levels), there is no guarantee that we will be able to do so in the future.

Our deposit insurance premiums could be substantially higher in the future which will have an adverse effect on our future earnings —Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, the FDIC, absent extraordinary circumstances, must establish and implement a plan to restore the deposit insurance reserve ratio to 1.15% of insured deposits, over an eight-year period, at any time that the reserve ratio falls below 1.15%. The FDIC expects a higher rate of insured institution failures in the next few years, which may result in a continued decline in the reserve ratio.

As a member institution of the FDIC, we are required to pay semi-annual deposit insurance premium assessments to the FDIC. Due to the continued failures of FDIC insured depository institutions, FDIC insurance premiums have increased. We anticipate that our FDIC deposit insurance premiums may increase in the future, perhaps significantly, which will adversely impact our future earnings.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None

Item 2. Properties.

Our headquarters building is located in downtown South Bend. In 1982, the land was leased from the City of South Bend on a 49-year lease, with a 50-year renewal option. The building is part of a larger complex, including a 300-room hotel and a 500-car parking garage. Also, in 1982, we sold the building and entered into a leaseback agreement with the purchaser for a term of 30 years. The building is a structure of approximately 160,000 square feet, with 1st Source and our subsidiaries occupying approximately 65% of the available office space and approximately 35% subleased to unrelated tenants.

At December 31, 2009, we also owned property and/or buildings on which 55 of the 1st Source Bank's 76 banking centers were located, including the facilities in Allen, Elkhart, Fulton, Huntington, Kosciusko, LaPorte, Marshall, Porter, St. Joseph, Starke, and Wells Counties in the State of Indiana and Berrien and Cass Counties in the State of Michigan, as well as an operations center, warehouse, and our former headquarters building, which is utilized for additional business operations. The Bank leases additional property and/or buildings to and from third parties under lease agreements negotiated at arms-length.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

1st Source and our subsidiaries are involved in various legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of our businesses. Our management does not expect that the outcome of any such proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None

- 10 -

Table of Contents

Part II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol "SRCE." The following table sets forth for each quarter the high and low sales prices for our common stock, as reported by Nasdaq, and the cash dividends paid per share for each quarter.

	2009 Sales Price				Cash Dividends		2008 Sales Price				Cash Dividends
Common Stock Prices (quarter ended)	High		Low		Paid		High		Low		Paid
March 31	$	23.92	$	14.16	$	.14	$	21.81	$	15.13	$	.14
June 30		21.98		15.36		.14		22.62		16.10		.14
September 30		17.94		14.52		.15		30.00		14.54		.14
December 31		16.60		13.84		.16		25.56		12.61		.16
As of December 31, 2009, there were 967 holders of record of 1st Source common stock

Comparison of Five Year Cumulative Total Return*

Among 1st Source, Morningstar Market Weighted NASDAQ Index** and Peer Group Index***

* Assumes $100 invested on December 31, 2004, in 1st Source Corporation common stock, NASDAQ market index, and peer group index.

** The Morningstar Weighted NASDAQ Index Return is calculated using all companies which trade as NASD Capital Markets, NASD Global Markets or NASD Global Select. It includes both domestic and foreign companies. The index is weighted by the then current shares outstanding and assumes dividends reinvested. The return is calculated on a monthly basis.

*** The peer group is a market-capitalization-weighted stock index of 124 banking companies in Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin.

NOTE: Total return assumes reinvestment of dividends.

- 11 -

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes our share repurchase activity during the three months ended December 31, 2009.

			Total Number of	Maximum Number (or Approximate
			Shares Purchased as	Dollar Value) of Shares that
	Total Number of	Average Price	Part of Publicly Announced	may yet be Purchased Under
Period	Shares Purchased	Paid Per Share	Plans or Programs*	the Plans or Programs
October 01 - 31, 2009	4,000	$14.79	4,000	1,390,572
November 01 - 30, 2009	21,533	14.29	21,533	1,369,039
December 01 - 31, 2009	4,900	14.39	4,900	1,364,139
*1st Source maintains a stock repurchase plan that was authorized by the Board of Directors on April 26, 2007. Under the terms of the plan, 1st Source may repurchase up to
2,000,000 shares of its common stock when favorable conditions exist on the open market or through private transactions at various prices from time to time. Since the inception
of the plan, 1st Source has repurchased a total of 635,861 shares.

Federal laws and regulations contain restrictions on the ability of 1st Source and the Bank to pay dividends. For information regarding restrictions on dividends, see Part I, Item 1, Business - Regulation and Supervision - Dividends and Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, as a result of our participation in the TARP Capital Purchase Program, we may not increase the quarterly dividends we pay on our common stock above $0.16 per share during the three-year period ending January 23, 2012, without the consent of the U.S. Treasury Department, unless the Treasury Department no longer holds shares of the Series A Preferred Stock we issued in the TARP Capital Purchase Program.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes presented elsewhere herein.

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	2009			2008			2007 (2)			2006			2005
Interest income	$	200,412		$	235,308		$	253,587		$	208,994		$	168,532
Interest expense		72,200			103,148			134,677			102,561			70,104
Net interest income		128,212			132,160			118,910			106,433			98,428
Provision for (recovery of) loan and lease losses		31,101			16,648			7,534			(2,736	)		(5,855	)
Net interest income after provision for (recovery of)
loan and lease losses		97,111			115,512			111,376			109,169			104,283
Noninterest income		85,530			84,003			70,619			76,585			68,533
Noninterest expense		151,123			153,114			140,312			126,211			123,439
Income before income taxes		31,518			46,401			41,683			59,543			49,377
Income taxes		6,028			13,015			11,144			20,246			15,626
Net income		25,490			33,386			30,539			39,297			33,751
Net income available to common shareholders	$	19,074		$	33,386		$	30,539		$	39,297		$	33,751
Assets at year-end	$	4,542,100		$	4,464,174		$	4,447,104		$	3,807,315		$	3,511,277
Long-term debt and mandatorily redeemable
securities at year-end		19,761			29,832			34,702			43,761			23,237
Shareholders’ equity at year-end (3)		570,320			453,664			430,504			368,904			345,576
Basic net income per common share (1)		0.79			1.38			1.30			1.74			1.48
Diluted net income per common share (1)		0.79			1.37			1.28			1.72			1.46
Cash dividends per common share (1)		.590			.580			.560			.534			.445
Dividend payout ratio		74.68	%		42.34	%		43.75	%		31.05	%		30.48	%
Return on average assets		0.57	%		0.76	%		0.74	%		1.11	%		1.00	%
Return on average common equity		4.07	%		7.52	%		7.47	%		10.98	%		10.12	%
Average common equity to average assets		10.40	%		10.09	%		9.85	%		10.07	%		9.89	%

(1) The computation of per common share data gives retroactive recognition to a 10% stock dividend declared July 27, 2006.
(2) Results for 2007 and later include the acquisition of FINA Bancorp, Inc.
(3) Results for 2009 include the issuance of Preferred Stock under TARP. Refer to Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The purpose of this analysis is to provide the reader with information relevant to understanding and assessing our results of operations for each of the past three years and financial condition for each of the past two years. In order to fully appreciate this analysis the reader is encouraged to review the consolidated financial statements and statistical data presented in this document.

- 12 -

Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements

This report, including Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, assumptions, estimates, intentions, and future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may be beyond our control, and which may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be forward-looking statements. Words such as “believe”, “contemplate”, “seek”, “estimate”, “plan”, “project”, “anticipate”, “possible”, “assume”, “expect”, “intend”, “targeted”, “continue”, “remain”, “will”, “should”, “indicate”, “would”, “may” and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. Forward-looking statements provide current expectations or forecasts of future events and are not guarantees of future performance, nor should they be relied upon as representing management’s views as of any subsequent date.

All written or oral forward-looking statements that are made by or attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary notice. We have no obligation and do not undertake to update, revise, or correct any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report, or after the respective dates on which such statements otherwise are made. We have expressed our expectations, beliefs, and projections in good faith and we believe they have a reasonable basis. However, we make no assurances that our expectations, beliefs, or projections will be achieved or accomplished. These forward-looking statements may not be realized due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation, the following:

·	Local, regional, national, and international economic conditions and the impact they may have on us and our clients and our assessment of that impact.

·	Changes in the level of nonperforming assets and charge-offs.

·	Changes in estimates of future cash reserve requirements based upon the periodic review thereof under relevant regulatory and accounting requirements.

·	The effects of and changes in trade and monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including the interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve Board.

·	Inflation, interest rate, securities market, and monetary fluctuations.

·	Political instability.

·	Acts of war or terrorism.

·	Substantial increases in the cost of fuel.

·	The timely development and acceptance of new products and services and perceived overall value of these products and services by others.

·	Changes in consumer spending, borrowings, and savings habits.

·	Changes in the financial performance and/or condition of our borrowers.

·	Technological changes.

·	Acquisitions and integration of acquired businesses.

·	The ability to increase market share and control expenses.

·	Changes in the competitive environment among bank holding companies.

·	The effect of changes in laws and regulations (including laws and regulations concerning taxes, banking, securities, and insurance) with which we and our subsidiaries must comply.

·	The effect of changes in accounting policies and practices and auditing requirements, as may be adopted by the regulatory agencies, as well as the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, and other accounting standard setters.

·	Changes in our organization, compensation, and benefit plans.

·	The costs and effects of legal and regulatory developments including the resolution of legal proceedings or regulatory or other governmental inquires and the results of regulatory examinations or reviews.

·	Greater than expected costs or difficulties related to the integration of new products and lines of business.

·	Our success at managing the risks described in Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and follow general practices within the industries in which we operate. Application of these principles requires our management to make estimates or judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates or judgments reflect our management’s view of the most appropriate manner in which to record and report our overall financial performance. Because these estimates or judgments are based on current circumstances, they may change over time or prove to be inaccurate based on actual experience. As such, changes in these estimates, judgments, and/or assumptions may have a significant impact on our financial statements. All accounting policies are important, and all policies described in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 1 (Note 1), should be reviewed for a greater understanding of how our financial performance is recorded and reported.

We have identified three policies as being critical because they require our management to make particularly difficult, subjective, and/or complex estimates or judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because of the likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. These policies relate to the determination of the reserve for loan and lease losses, the valuation of mortgage servicing rights, and fair value measurements. Our management has used the best information available to make the estimations or judgments necessary to value the related assets and liabilities. Actual performance that differs from estimates or judgments and future changes in the key variables could change future valuations and impact net income. Our management has reviewed the application of these policies with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Following is a discussion of the areas we view as our most critical accounting policies.

- 13 -

Table of Contents

Reserve for Loan and Lease Losses — The reserve for loan and lease losses represents our management’s estimate of probable losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio and the establishment of a reserve that is sufficient to absorb those losses. In determining an adequate reserve, our management makes numerous judgments, assumptions, and estimates based on continuous review of the loan and lease portfolio, estimates of client performance, collateral values, and disposition, as well as historical loss rates and expected cash flows. In assessing these factors, our management benefits from a lengthy organizational history and experience with credit decisions and related outcomes. Nonetheless, if our management’s underlying assumptions prove to be inaccurate, the reserve for loan and lease losses would have to be adjusted. Our accounting policy related to the reserve is disclosed in Note 1 under the heading "Reserve for Loan and Lease Losses."

Fair Value Measurements — We use fair value measurements to record certain financial instruments and to determine fair value disclosures. Available-for-sale securities, mortgage loans held for sale, and interest rate swap agreements are financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, we may be required to record at fair value other financial assets on a nonrecurring basis. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve write-downs of, or specific reserves against, individual assets. GAAP establishes a three-level hierarchy for disclosure of assets and liabilities recorded at fair value. The classification of assets and liabilities within the hierarchy is based on whether the inputs to the valuation methodology used in the measurement are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market-driven or market-based information obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our estimates about market data.

The degree of management judgment involved in determining the fair value of a financial instrument is dependent upon the availability of quoted market prices or observable market data. For financial instruments that trade actively and have quoted market prices or observable market data, there is minimal subjectivity involved in measuring fair value. When observable market prices and data are not fully available, management judgment is necessary to estimate fair value. In addition, changes in the market conditions may reduce the availability of quoted prices or observable data. For example, reduced liquidity in the capital markets or changes in secondary market activities could result in observable market inputs becoming unavailable. Therefore, when market data is not available, we use valuation techniques that require more management judgment to estimate the appropriate fair value measurement. Fair value is discussed further in Note 1 under the heading "Fair Value Measurements" and in Note 21, "Fair Values of Financial Instruments."

Mortgage Servicing Rights Valuation — We recognize as assets the rights to service mortgage loans for others, known as mortgage servicing rights, whether the servicing rights are acquired through purchases or through originated loans. Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active open market with readily observable market prices. Although sales of mortgage servicing rights do occur, the precise terms and conditions may not be readily available. As such, the value of mortgage servicing assets are established and valued using discounted cash flow modeling techniques which require management to make estimates regarding estimated future net servicing cash flows, taking into consideration actual and expected mortgage loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs, and other economic factors. The expected rates of mortgage loan prepayments are the most significant factors driving the value of mortgage servicing assets. Increases in mortgage loan prepayments reduce estimated future net servicing cash flows because the life of the underlying loan is reduced. In determining the fair value of the mortgage servicing assets, mortgage interest rates (which are used to determine prepayment rates), and discount rates are held constant over the estimated life of the portfolio. Expected mortgage loan prepayment rates are derived from a third-party model and adjusted to reflect our actual prepayment experience. Mortgage servicing assets are carried at the lower of amortized cost or fair value. The values of these assets are sensitive to changes in the assumptions used and readily available market pricing does not exist. The valuation of mortgage servicing assets is discussed further in Note 21, "Fair Values of Financial Instruments."

Earnings Summary

Net income in 2009 was $25.49 million, down from $33.39 million in 2008 and down from $30.54 million in 2007. Diluted net income per common share was $0.79 in 2009, $1.37 in 2008, and $1.28 in 2007. Return on average total assets was 0.57% in 2009 compared to 0.76% in 2008, and 0.74% in 2007. Return on average common shareholders' equity was 4.07% in 2009 versus 7.52% in 2008, and 7.47% in 2007.

Net income in 2009 was negatively impacted by a $14.45 million or 86.82% increase in provision for loan and lease losses over 2008 and a reduction of $11.49 million gain due to sale of certain assets of Investment Advisors in 2008, which was offset by an improvement of $11.68 million or 116.88% in investment securities due to impairment recorded in 2008 that was not present in 2009. Net income in 2008, as compared to 2007, was favorably affected by a $13.25 million or 11.14% increase in net interest income, the $11.49 million gain on the sale of certain assets of Investment Advisors and increased noninterest income. However, these increases were offset by increased provision for loan and lease losses, investment securities impairment and increased noninterest expenses.

Dividends paid on common stock in 2009 amounted to $0.59 per share, compared to $0.58 per share in 2008, and $0.56 per share in 2007. The level of earnings reinvested and dividend payouts are based on management’s assessment of future growth opportunities and the level of capital necessary to support them.

Acquisition of First National Bank, Valparaiso — On May 31, 2007, we acquired FINA Bancorp (FINA), the parent company of First National Bank, Valparaiso for $134.19 million. First National was a full service bank with 16 banking facilities, as of December 31, 2007, located in Porter and LaPorte Counties of Indiana. Pursuant to the definitive agreement, FINA shareholders were able to choose whether to receive 1st Source common stock and/or cash pursuant to the election procedures described in the definitive agreement. Under the terms of the transaction, FINA was acquired in exchange for 2,124,974 shares of 1st Source common stock valued at $53.68 million and $80.51 million in cash. The value of the common stock was $25.26 per share. We believe that the purchase of FINA is a natural extension of our service area and is consistent with our growth and market expansion initiatives. On June 6, 2008, First National was merged with 1st Source Bank.

Net Interest Income — Our primary source of earnings is net interest income, the difference between income on earning assets and the cost of funds supporting those assets. Significant categories of earning assets are loans and securities while deposits and borrowings represent the major portion of interest-bearing liabilities. For purposes of the following discussion, comparison of net interest income is done on a tax equivalent basis, which provides a common basis for comparing yields on earning assets exempt from federal income taxes to those which are fully taxable.

Net interest margin (the ratio of net interest income to average earning assets) is affected by movements in interest rates and changes in the mix of earning assets and the liabilities that fund those assets. Net interest margin on a fully taxable equivalent basis was 3.14% in 2009 compared to 3.34% in 2008, and 3.18% in 2007. The lower margin in 2009 reflects the decline in yields on earning assets which was partially offset by lower funding costs. Net interest income was $128.21 million for 2009, compared to $132.16 million for 2008. Tax-equivalent net interest income totaled $132.00 million for 2009, a decrease of $3.75 million from the $135.75 million reported for 2008. The $3.75 million decrease is mainly due to changes in rates.

- 14 -

Table of Contents

During 2009, average earning assets increased $130.90 million while average interest-bearing liabilities decreased $67.19 million over the comparable period in 2008. The yield on average earning assets decreased 101 basis points to 4.86% for 2009 from 5.87% for 2008. The rate earned on assets was negatively impacted by decreases in market rates. Total cost of average interest-bearing liabilities decreased 84 basis points during 2009 as liabilities were also impacted by decreases in market rates. The result was a decrease of 20 basis points to net interest spread, or the difference between interest income on earning assets and expense on interest-bearing liabilities.

The largest contributor to the decrease in the yield on average earning assets in 2009 was the 77 basis point decrease in the loan and lease portfolio yield. The decrease in the loan and lease portfolio yield was further impacted by a decrease in net loan and lease outstandings. Average net loans and leases decreased $108.46 million or 3.32% in 2009 from 2008.

During 2009, the tax-equivalent yield on securities available for sale decreased 132 basis points to 3.28% while the average balance increased $121.21 million.

Average mortgages held for sale increased $40.25 million during 2009; however the yield decreased 83 basis points.

Average interest-bearing deposits increased $149.31 million during 2009 while the effective rate paid on those deposits decreased 88 basis points. Average non interest-bearing demand deposits increased $50.07 million during 2009.

Average short-term borrowings decreased $201.20 million during 2009 while the effective rate paid decreased 137 basis points. Average subordinated notes which represent our trust preferred borrowings decreased $1.27 million during 2009, while the effective rate decreased three basis points. Average long-term debt decreased $14.02 million during 2009 as the effective rate decreased 76 basis points.

The following table provides an analysis of net interest income and illustrates interest income earned and interest expense charged for each major component of interest earning assets and the interest bearing liabilities. Yields/rates are computed on a tax-equivalent basis, using a 35% rate. Nonaccrual loans and leases are included in the average loan and lease balance outstanding.

			2009					2008					2007
			Interest					Interest					Interest
	Average		Income/	Yield/		Average		Income/	Yield/		Average		Income/	Yield/
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		Expense	Rate		Balance		Expense	Rate		Balance		Expense	Rate
ASSETS
Investment securities:
Taxable	$ 629,229		$ 17,594	2.80	%	$ 491,061		$ 22,170	4.51	%	$ 510,949		$ 25,136	4.92	%
Tax-exempt	205,796		9,801	4.76		222,751		10,692	4.80		225,849		10,800	4.78
Mortgages held for sale	74,173		3,907	5.27		33,925		2,069	6.10		28,913		1,892	6.54
Net loans and leases	3,154,820		171,669	5.44		3,263,276		202,539	6.21		2,992,540		214,725	7.18
Other investments	135,494		1,228	0.91		57,601		1,425	2.47		94,478		4,657	4.93
Total earning assets	4,199,512		204,199	4.86		4,068,614		238,895	5.87		3,852,729		257,210	6.68
Cash and due from banks	59,626					83,270					81,714
Reserve for loan and
lease losses	(85,095	)				(71,358	)				(61,555	)
Other assets	331,809					319,997					278,421
Total assets	$ 4,505,852					$ 4,400,523					$ 4,151,309
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest bearing deposits	$ 3,146,135		$ 63,521	2.02	%	$ 2,996,830		$ 86,903	2.90	%	$ 2,918,756		$ 115,113	3.94	%
Short-term borrowings	185,647		1,115	0.60		386,850		7,626	1.97		271,377		10,935	4.03
Subordinated notes	89,692		6,589	7.35		90,960		6,714	7.38		82,414		6,051	7.34
Long-term debt and
mandatorily redeemable
securities	20,448		975	4.77		34,472		1,905	5.53		42,265		2,578	6.10
Total interest bearing liabilities	3,441,922		72,200	2.10		3,509,112		103,148	2.94		3,314,812		134,677	4.06
Noninterest bearing deposits	427,513					377,440					351,050
Other liabilities	69,953					69,823					76,472
Shareholders' equity	566,464					444,148					408,975
Total liabilities and
shareholders’ equity	$ 4,505,852					$ 4,400,523					$ 4,151,309
Net interest income			$ 131,999					$ 135,747					$ 122,533
Net interest margin on a tax
equivalent basis				3.14	%				3.34	%				3.18	%

- 15 -

Table of Contents

The change in interest due to both rate and volume has been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each. The following table shows changes in tax equivalent interest earned and interest paid, resulting from changes in volume and changes in rates:

	Increase (Decrease) due to
(Dollars in thousands)	Volume			Rate			Net
2009 compared to 2008
Interest earned on:
Investment securities:
Taxable	$	12,787		$	(17,363	)	$	(4,576	)
Tax-exempt		(803	)		(88	)		(891	)
Mortgages held for sale		2,077			(239	)		1,838
Net loans and leases		(6,405	)		(24,465	)		(30,870	)
Other investments		(371	)		174			(197	)
Total earning assets	$	7,285		$	(41,981	)	$	(34,696	)
Interest paid on:
Interest bearing deposits	$	4,560		$	(27,942	)	$	(23,382	)
Short-term borrowings		(2,787	)		(3,724	)		(6,511	)
Subordinated notes		(98	)		(27	)		(125	)
Long-term debt and mandatorily redeemable securities		(695	)		(235	)		(930	)
Total interest bearing liabilities	$	980		$	(31,928	)	$	(30,948	)
Net interest income	$	6,305		$	(10,053	)	$	(3,748	)
2008 compared to 2007
Interest earned on:
Investment securities:
Taxable	$	(927	)	$	(2,039	)	$	(2,966	)
Tax-exempt		(153	)		45			(108	)
Mortgages held for sale		290			(113	)		177
Net loans and leases		24,816			(37,002	)		(12,186	)
Other investments		(1,417	)		(1,815	)		(3,232	)
Total earning assets	$	22,609		$	(40,924	)	$	(18,315	)
Interest paid on:
Interest bearing deposits	$	3,045		$	(31,255	)	$	(28,210	)
Short-term borrowings		16,581			(19,890	)		(3,309	)
Subordinated notes		630			33			663
Long-term debt and mandatorily redeemable securities		(447	)		(226	)		(673	)
Total interest bearing liabilities	$	19,809		$	(51,338	)	$	(31,529	)
Net interest income	$	2,800		$	10,414		$	13,214

Noninterest Income — Noninterest income increased $1.53 million or 1.82% in 2009 from 2008 following a $13.38 million or 18.95% increase in 2008 over 2007. Noninterest income for the most recent three years ended December 31 was as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	2009		2008			2007
Noninterest income:
Trust fees	$	15,036	$	18,599		$	15,567
Service charges on deposit accounts		20,645		22,035			20,470
Mortgage banking income		8,251		2,994			2,868
Insurance commissions		4,930		5,363			4,666
Equipment rental income		25,757		24,224			21,312
Other income		9,224		9,293			8,864
Gain on sale of certain Investment Advisor assets		-		11,492			-
Investment securities and other investment gains (losses)		1,687		(9,997	)		(3,128	)
Total noninterest income	$	85,530	$	84,003		$	70,619

- 16 -

Table of Contents

Trust fees (which include investment management fees, estate administration fees, mutual fund fees, annuity fees, and fiduciary fees) decreased by $3.56 million or 19.16% in 2009 from 2008 compared to an increase of $3.03 million or 19.48% in 2008 over 2007. Trust fees are largely based on the size of client relationships and the market value of assets under management. The market value of trust assets under management at December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $2.80 billion and $2.65 billion, respectively. At December 31, 2009, these trust assets were comprised of $1.65 billion of personal and agency trusts, $0.77 billion of employee benefit plan assets, $294.90 million of estate administration assets and individual retirement accounts, and $81.82 million of custody assets. The decline in trust fees in 2009 was primarily due to a reduction in our investment advisory management fees received from the 1st Source Monogram Funds due to the sale of assets related to the management of such funds in December 2008. The reduction in investment advisory management fees is partially offset by earnout fees on the sale of $2.10 million which are reflected in other income.

Service charges on deposit accounts decreased $1.39 million or 6.31% in 2009 from 2008 compared to an increase of $1.57 million or 7.65% in 2008 from 2007. The decline in service charges on deposit accounts in 2009 reflects a lower volume of overdraft and nonsufficient fund transactions. The growth in service charges on deposit accounts in 2008 from 2007 reflects growth in the number of deposit accounts due to the May 2007 acquisition of First National and a higher volume of fee generating transactions, primarily overdrafts, debit card and nonsufficient funds transactions.

Mortgage banking income increased $5.26 million or 175.58% in 2009 over 2008, compared to an increase of $0.13 million or 4.39% in 2008 over 2007. In 2009, we had $2.07 million in recoveries of mortgage servicing rights impairment and increased gain on sale of loans. The increase in 2008 was primarily due to gains on mortgage loan sales which were offset by $1.91 million in mortgage servicing rights impairment. During 2009, 2008 and 2007, we determined that no permanent write-down was necessary for previously recorded impairment on mortgage servicing assets.

Insurance commissions were down $0.43 million or 8.07% in 2009 from 2008 compared to an increase of $0.70 million or 14.94% in 2008 from 2007. The lower commission income in 2009 was mainly due to lower premiums as a result of market conditions and a reduction in customer accounts. The increase for 2008 was mainly attributed to an acquisition of an insurance agency in the Fort Wayne area.

Equipment rental income generated from operating leases grew by $1.53 million or 6.33% during 2009 from 2008 compared to an increase of $2.91 million or 13.66% during 2008 from 2007. Revenues from operating leases for transportation equipment, aircraft and special purpose vehicles increased as clients responded positively to our strong marketing efforts and entered into new lease agreements.

On August 25, 2008, Investment Advisors entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with WA Holdings, Inc. ("Buyer") whereby Investment Advisors agreed to sell certain assets to Buyer and to enter into a long-term strategic partnership with Buyer. Pursuant to the Purchase and Sale Agreement, in December 2008, Buyer and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Wasatch Advisors, Inc., investment advisor of the Wasatch Funds, Inc., acquired assets of Investment Advisors related to the management of the 1st Source Monogram Mutual Funds - the Income Equity Fund, the Long/Short Fund and the Income Fund. The 1st Source Monogram Mutual Funds were reorganized into the Wasatch - 1st Source Income Equity Fund, the Wasatch - 1st Source Long/Short Fund, and the Wasatch - 1st Source Income Fund. Investment Advisors recorded a net gain of $11.49 million at closing, which was net of $1.51 million of legal and compensation expense.

Investment securities and other investment gains totaled $1.69 million for the year ended 2009 compared to losses of $10.00 million for the year ended 2008 and losses of $3.13 million for the year ended 2007. In 2008 and 2007, we took $10.82 million and $4.11 million, respectively, in impairment charges on investments in the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) preferred stock and other preferred equities as a result of the deterioration in the residential mortgage business and government intervention at the FNMA and the FHLMC. Due to the uncertainty of future market conditions and how they might impact the financial performance of the FNMA and the FHLMC, we sold our remaining shares of the FHLMC and FNMA preferred stock in 2009 realizing gains of $390 thousand. Also due to market uncertainty, we sold our remaining shares of corporate preferred stocks, realizing losses of $688 thousand.

Other income remained relatively stable in 2009 from 2008 and in 2008 from 2007.

Noninterest Expense — Noninterest expense decreased $1.99 million or 1.30% in 2009 over 2008 following a $12.80 million or 9.12% increase in 2008 from 2007. Noninterest expense for the recent three years ended December 31 was as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	2009		2008		2007
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits	$	72,483	$	76,965	$	73,944
Net occupancy expense		9,185		9,698		9,030
Furniture and equipment expense		13,980		15,095		15,145
Depreciation — leased equipment		20,515		19,450		17,085
Professional fees		4,399		8,446		4,575
Supplies and communications		5,916		6,782		5,987
Business development and marketing expense		3,488		3,749		4,788
Loan and lease collection and repossession expense		4,283		1,162		1,123
FDIC and other insurance		8,362		2,601		1,190
Intangible asset amortization		1,352		1,393		874
Other expense		7,160		7,773		6,571
Total noninterest expense	$	151,123	$	153,114	$	140,312

Total salaries and employee benefits decreased $4.48 million or 5.82% in 2009 from 2008, following a $3.02 million or 4.09% increase in 2008 from 2007.

Employee salaries decreased $0.63 million or 1.02% in 2009 from 2008 compared to an increase of $2.20 million or 3.69% in 2008 from 2007. The decline in 2009 was the result of a lower work force offset by a decline in salaries deferred relating to the origination of loans. The increase in 2008 was due to a full year of First National staff and a decline in salaries deferred relating to the origination of loans.

- 17 -

Table of Contents

Employee benefits decreased $3.85 million or 25.56% in 2009 from 2008, compared to an increase of $0.82 million or 5.74% in 2008 from 2007. The decrease in 2009 was primarily due to lower group insurance costs and a reversal of post retirement benefit obligations due to the termination of the post retirement benefit plan for new retirees. The increase in 2008 was primarily due to increased group insurance costs.

Occupancy expense decreased $0.51 million or 5.29% in 2009 from 2008, compared to an increase of $0.67 million or 7.40% in 2008 from 2007. The decrease in 2009 was mainly a result of lower repair costs on our premises. The increase in 2008 was primarily due to the increase in number of locations following the acquisition of First National.

Furniture and equipment expense, including depreciation, declined $1.12 million or 7.39% in 2009 from 2008 compared to a slight decline in 2008 from 2007. The decrease in 2009 was caused by lower depreciation expense and lower computer processing charges. During 2008 increased computer processing charges offset declines in repairs and depreciation.

Depreciation on equipment owned under operating leases increased $1.07 million or 5.48% in 2009 from 2008, following a $2.37 million or 13.84% increase in 2008 from 2007. In 2009 and 2008, depreciation on equipment owned under operating leases increased in conjunction with the increase in equipment rental income as some of our clients opted to enter into new lease arrangements rather than purchase equipment.

Professional fees decreased $4.05 million or 47.92% in 2009 from 2008, compared to a $3.87 million or 84.61% increase in 2008 from 2007. In 2008, professional fees were higher due to expenses recorded for a systems security breach that occurred in May 2008 and other consulting expenses. In 2009, professional fees returned to the 2007 level.

Supplies and communications expense decreased $0.87 million or 12.77% in 2009 from 2008 after a $0.80 million or 13.28% increase in 2008 as compared to 2007. The decrease in 2009 was primarily a result of lower postage expense and printing and supplies expense. The increase in 2008 was due to increased printing cost, freight expense and data line expense.

Business development and marketing expense decreased $0.26 million or 6.96% in 2009 from 2008 compared to a $1.04 million or 21.70% decrease in 2008 from 2007. The decrease in 2009 and 2008 was related to lower retail marketing and institutional marketing expenses.

Loan and lease collection and repossession expenses increased $3.12 million or 268.59% in 2009 from 2008 compared to remaining stable in 2008 from 2007. The increase in 2009 was due to increased collection and repossession activity as our nonperforming assets increased.

FDIC and other insurance expense increased $5.76 million or 221.49% in 2009 over 2008 versus a $1.41 million or 118.57% increase in 2008 over 2007. The increase in 2009 was due to higher Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insurance premiums as insurance rates increased and a $1.98 million special FDIC insurance assessment which was calculated at 5 basis points of assets minus tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009. The increase in 2008 was due to higher FDIC insurance premiums.

Intangible asset amortization decreased $0.04 million or 2.94% in 2009 from 2008 compared to a $0.52 million or 59.38% increase in 2008 from 2007. The decrease in 2009 was due to carrying value adjustments relating to a prior acquisition. The increase in intangible asset amortization for 2008 was due to the amortization of intangibles related to the First National acquisition.

Other expenses decreased $0.61 million or 7.89% in 2009 as compared to 2008 following an increase of $1.20 million or 18.29% in 2008 from 2007. The decrease in 2009 was due to higher deferred costs on originated loans, lower convention costs, lower trust preferred amortization expense and lower filing expenses offset by higher mortgage loan payoff expense and lower gain on sale of operating equipment. Increased correspondent bank fees and write-downs of former bank premises held for sale contributed to the 2008 increase.

Income Taxes — 1st Source recognized income tax expense in 2009 of $6.03 million, compared to $13.02 million in 2008, and $11.14 million in 2007. The effective tax rate in 2009 was 19.13% compared to 28.05% in 2008, and 26.74% in 2007. The effective tax rate decreased in 2009 compared to 2008 due to a one time benefit of $2.60 million and an increase in tax-exempt interest in relation to income before taxes. The 2009 benefit was the result of a reduction in our tax contingency reserve due to the resolution of tax audits. The effective tax rate increased in 2008 compared to 2007 due to a decrease in tax-exempt interest in relation to income before taxes as well as an increase in state tax expense. For detailed analysis of 1st Source’s income taxes see Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Financial Condition

Loan and Lease Portfolio — The following table shows 1st Source’s loan and lease distribution at the end of each of the last five years as of December 31:

(Dollars in thousands)	2009		2008		2007		2006		2005
Commercial and agricultural loans	$	546,222	$	643,440	$	593,806	$	478,310	$	453,197
Auto, light truck and environmental equipment		349,741		353,838		305,238		317,604		310,786
Medium and heavy duty truck		204,545		243,375		300,469		341,744		302,137
Aircraft financing		617,384		632,121		587,022		498,914		459,645
Construction equipment financing		313,300		375,983		377,785		305,976		224,230
Loans secured by real estate		952,223		918,749		881,646		632,283		601,077
Consumer loans		109,735		130,706		145,475		127,706		112,359
Total loans and leases	$	3,093,150	$	3,298,212	$	3,191,441	$	2,702,537	$	2,463,431

At December 31, 2009, 11.6% of total loans and leases were concentrated with construction end users.

Average loans and leases, net of unearned discount, decreased $108.46 million or 3.32% and increased $270.74 million or 9.05% in 2009 and 2008, respectively. Loans and leases, net of unearned discount, at December 31, 2009, were $3.09 billion and were 68.10% of total assets, compared to $3.30 billion and 73.88% of total assets at December 31, 2008.

Commercial and agricultural lending, excluding those loans secured by real estate, decreased $97.22 million or 15.11% in 2009 over 2008. Commercial and agricultural lending outstandings were $546.22 million and $643.44 million at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. This decrease was

- 18 -

Table of Contents

mainly due to the weak economy in our geographic markets. Businesses reduced their working capital line of credit borrowings given lower accounts receivable and inventory levels caused by a decline in their sales. The weak economy also accounted for a reduction in term loan financing attributed to less equipment purchases by companies in our market.

Loans secured by real estate increased $33.47 million or 3.64% during 2009 over 2008. Loans secured by real estate outstanding at December 31, 2009 were $952.22 million and $918.75 million at December 31, 2008. Loans on commercial real estate, the majority of which is owner occupied, were $580.71 million at December 31, 2009 and $574.39 million at December 31, 2008. Residential mortgage lending was $371.51 million at December 31, 2009 and $344.36 million at December 31, 2008. The increase in residential mortgage lending was primarily due to a higher volume of refinance activity as a result of lower market interest rates and our decision to retain more loans in our portfolio.

Auto, light truck, and environmental equipment financing decreased $4.10 million or 1.16% in 2009 over 2008. At December 31, 2009, auto, light truck, and environmental equipment financing had outstandings of $349.74 million and $353.84 million at December 31, 2008.

Medium and heavy duty truck loans and leases decreased $38.83 million or 15.95%, in 2009. Medium and heavy duty truck financing at December 31, 2009 and 2008 had outstandings of $204.55 million and $243.38 million, respectively. Most of the decrease at December 31, 2009 from December 31, 2008 can be attributed to a reduced need for funding as over-capacity issues caused our customer base to downsize their fleets.

Aircraft financing at year-end 2009 decreased $14.74 million or 2.33% from year-end 2008. Aircraft financing at December 31, 2009 and 2008 had outstandings of $617.38 million and $632.12 million, respectively. The demand for aircraft financing in the United States declined while international demand increased.

Construction equipment financing decreased $62.68 million or 16.67% in 2009 compared to 2008. Construction equipment financing at December 31, 2009 had outstandings of $313.30 million, compared to outstandings of $375.98 million at December 31, 2008. The decrease in this category was primarily due to a national decrease in construction related activity and a substantial decrease in sales of both new and used construction equipment.

Consumer loans decreased $20.97 million or 16.04% in 2009 over 2008. Consumer loans outstanding at December 31, 2009, were $109.74 million and $130.71 million at December 31, 2008. The decrease during 2009 was due to the economic slow down which caused an increase in the unemployment rates in our primary markets, thereby decreasing the demand for consumer loans.

The following table shows the maturities of loans and leases in the categories of commercial and agriculture, auto, light truck and environmental equipment, medium and heavy duty truck, aircraft and construction equipment outstanding as of December 31, 2009. The amounts due after one year are also classified according to the sensitivity to changes in interest rates.

(Dollars in thousands)	0-1 Year		1-5 Years		Over 5 Years		Total
Commercial and agricultural loans	$	320,731	$	203,362	$	22,129	$	546,222
Auto, light truck and environmental equipment		182,983		163,220		3,538		349,741
Medium and heavy duty truck		88,320		114,946		1,279		204,545
Aircraft financing		205,095		353,945		58,344		617,384
Construction equipment financing		129,965		182,006		1,329		313,300
Total	$	927,094	$	1,017,479	$	86,619	$	2,031,192

Rate Sensitivity (Dollars in thousands)	Fixed Rate		Variable Rate		Total
1 – 5 Years	$	613,928	$	403,551	$	1,017,479
Over 5 Years		7,031		79,588		86,619
Total	$	620,959	$	483,139	$	1,104,098

Most of the Bank's residential mortgages are sold into the secondary market. Mortgage loans held for sale were $26.65 million at December 31, 2009 and were $46.69 million at December 31, 2008. Although 1st Source Bank is participating in the U.S. Treasury Making Home Affordable programs, we do not feel it has a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

A loan is considered a restructured loan in cases where a borrower experiences financial difficulties and we make certain concessionary modifications to contractual terms. Loans restructured at a rate equal to or greater than that of a new loan with comparable risk at the time the contract is modified may be excluded from restructured loan disclosures after a period of six months if they are in compliance with the modified terms. Restructured loans that are accruing interest total $18.31 million at December 31, 2009 and $6.74 million at December 31, 2008.

Credit Experience

Reserve for Loan and Lease Losses — Our reserve for loan and lease losses is provided for by direct charges to operations. Losses on loans and leases are charged against the reserve and likewise, recoveries during the period for prior losses are credited to the reserve. Our management evaluates the adequacy of the reserve quarterly, reviewing all loans and leases over a fixed-dollar amount ($100,000) where the internal credit rating is at or below a predetermined classification, actual and anticipated loss experience, current economic events in specific industries, and other pertinent factors including general economic conditions. Determination of the reserve is inherently subjective as it requires significant estimates, including the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows or fair value of collateral on collateral-dependent impaired loans and leases, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans and leases based on historical loss experience, and consideration of economic trends, all of which may be susceptible to significant and unforeseen changes. We review the status of the loan and lease portfolio to identify borrowers that might develop financial problems in order to aid borrowers in the handling of their accounts and to mitigate losses. See Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the reserve for loan and lease losses.

- 19 -

Table of Contents

The reserve for loan and lease losses at December 31, 2009, totaled $88.24 million and was 2.85% of loans and leases, compared to $79.78 million or 2.42% of loans and leases at December 31, 2008 and $66.60 million or 2.09% of loans and leases at December 31, 2007. It is our opinion that the reserve for loan and lease losses was adequate to absorb losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio as of December 31, 2009.

Charge-offs for loan and lease losses were $28.22 million for 2009, compared to $8.39 million for 2008 and $7.37 million for 2007. Charge-offs increased in 2009 and 2008 as a result of an increase in nonperforming loans and leases related to weaker economic conditions.

The provision for loan and lease losses was $31.10 million for 2009, compared to the provision for loan and lease losses of $16.65 million for 2008 and the provision for loan and lease losses of $7.53 million for 2007. The increased provision for loan and lease losses in 2009 and 2008 was due to the deterioration in the loan portfolio mainly due to the deterioration in the economy.

The following table summarizes our loan and lease loss experience for each of the last five years ended December 31:

(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2007			2006			2005
Amounts of loans and leases outstanding
at end of period	$	3,093,150		$	3,298,212		$	3,191,441		$	2,702,537		$	2,463,431
Average amount of net loans and leases outstanding
during period	$	3,154,820		$	3,263,276		$	2,992,540		$	2,566,217		$	2,348,690
Balance of reserve for loan and lease losses
at beginning of period	$	79,776		$	66,602		$	58,802		$	58,697		$	63,672
Charge-offs:
Commercial and agricultural loans		8,809			1,580			1,841			1,038			1,478
Auto, light truck and environmental equipment		2,750			234			1,770			340			630
Medium and heavy duty truck		2,071			924			569			-			15
Aircraft financing		7,812			462			378			1,126			2,424
Construction equipment financing		1,476			1,695			799			118			-
Loans secured by real estate		2,753			879			356			129			167
Consumer loans		2,544			2,619			1,654			1,203			858
Total charge-offs		28,215			8,393			7,367			3,954			5,572
Recoveries:
Commercial and agricultural loans		3,193			1,177			2,356			1,594			1,308
Auto, light truck and environmental equipment		310			330			446			430			1,140
Medium and heavy duty truck		5			248			64			59			174
Aircraft financing		983			2,230			1,779			3,612			2,255
Construction equipment financing		444			139			19			753			1,065
Loans secured by real estate		36			171			169			31			89
Consumer loans		603			624			421			316			421
Total recoveries		5,574			4,919			5,254			6,795			6,452
Net charge-offs (recoveries)		22,641			3,474			2,113			(2,841	)		(880	)
Provision for (recovery of provision for) loan and lease losses		31,101			16,648			7,534			(2,736	)		(5,855	)
Reserves acquired in acquisitions		-			-			2,379			-			-
Balance at end of period	$	88,236		$	79,776		$	66,602		$	58,802		$	58,697
Ratio of net charge-offs (recoveries) to average net
loans and leases outstanding		0.72	%		0.11	%		0.07	%		(0.11	)%		(0.04	)%
Ratio of reserve for loan and lease losses to net loans
and leases outstanding end of period		2.85	%		2.42	%		2.09	%		2.18	%		2.38	%
Coverage ratio of reserve for loan and lease losses to
non-performing loans and leases		104.84	%		212.30	%		592.49	%		374.75	%		349.45	%

- 20 -

Table of Contents

Net charge-offs (recoveries) as a percentage of average loans and leases by portfolio type follow:

	2009	2008	2007	2006	2005
Commercial and agricultural loans	0.95%	0.06%	(0.09)%	(0.12)%	0.04%
Auto, light truck and environmental equipment	0.73	(0.03)	0.40	(0.03)	(0.17)
Medium and heavy duty truck	0.93	0.25	0.16	(0.02)	(0.06)
Aircraft financing	1.09	(0.30)	(0.26)	(0.54)	0.04
Construction equipment financing	0.30	0.41	0.22	(0.24)	(0.51)
Loans secured by real estate	0.30	0.08	0.02	0.02	0.01
Consumer loans	1.63	1.44	0.88	0.74	0.41
Total net charge-offs (recoveries) to average portfolio loans and leases	0.72%	0.11%	0.07%	(0.11)%	(0.04)%

The reserve for loan and lease losses has been allocated according to the amount deemed necessary to provide for the estimated probable losses that have been incurred within the categories of loans and leases set forth in the table below. The amount of such components of the reserve at December 31 and the ratio of such loan and lease categories to total outstanding loan and lease balances, are as follows:

	2009					2008					2007					2006					2005
			Percent of					Percent of					Percent of					Percent of					Percent of
			Loans and					Loans and					Loans and					Loans and					Loans and
			Leases					Leases					Leases					Leases					Leases
			in Each					in Each					in Each					in Each					in Each
			Category					Category					Category					Category					Category
			to Total					to Total					to Total					to Total					to Total
	Reserve		Loans and			Reserve		Loans and			Reserve		Loans and			Reserve		Loan and			Reserve		Loans and
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Leases			Amount		Leases			Amount		Leases			Amount		Leases			Amount		Leases
Commercial and agricultural loans	$	23,852		17.66	%	$	23,025		19.51	%	$	17,393		18.61	%	$	14,547		17.70	%	$	15,472		18.40	%
Auto, light truck, and environmental equipment		10,334		11.31			9,852		10.73			7,242		9.57			7,022		11.75			6,877		12.62
Medium and heavy duty truck		6,095		6.61			8,915		7.38			8,775		9.41			6,337		12.65			6,131		12.26
Aircraft financing		24,594		19.96			19,163		19.17			17,761		18.39			18,621		18.46			19,583		18.66
Construction equipment financing		8,839		10.13			10,672		11.40			6,171		11.84			5,030		11.32			4,235		9.10
Loans secured by real estate		11,162		30.78			4,602		27.85			6,320		27.62			4,672		23.40			4,058		24.40
Consumer loans		3,360		3.55			3,547		3.96			2,940		4.56			2,573		4.72			2,341		4.56
Total	$	88,236		100.00	%	$	79,776		100.00	%	$	66,602		100.00	%	$	58,802		100.00	%	$	58,697		100.00	%

Nonperforming Assets — Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, restructured loans not performing in accordance with modified terms, other real estate, former bank premises held for sale, repossessions and other nonperforming assets we own. Our policy is to discontinue the accrual of interest on loans and leases where principal or interest is past due and remains unpaid for 90 days or more, or when an individual analysis of a borrower's credit worthiness indicates a credit should be placed on nonperforming status, except for residential mortgage loans, which are placed on nonaccrual at the time the loan is placed in foreclosure and consumer loans that are both well secured and in the process of collection. Nonperforming assets amounted to $101.01 million at December 31, 2009, compared to $44.17 million at December 31, 2008, and $18.48 million at December 31, 2007. Included in nonperforming loans were restructured loans that are not accruing interest of $2.63 million at December 31, 2009 and none at December 31, 2008. During 2009, interest income on nonaccrual loans and leases would have increased by approximately $5.17 million compared to $1.54 million in 2008 if these loans and leases had earned interest at their full contract rate.

Nonperforming assets at December 31, 2009 increased from December 31, 2008, mainly due to increases in nonaccrual loans and leases. The increase in nonaccrual loans and leases was spread among the various loan portfolios. The largest dollar increases during the most recent year occurred in the commercial and aircraft portfolios. As of December 31, 2009, the industry with the largest dollar exposure was with borrowers whose primary source of income was derived from commercial real estate. These loans totaled approximately $25.74 million which were comprised of $20.77 million secured by commercial real estate and included in loans secured by real estate and $4.98 million secured by aircraft and included in aircraft financing. We have limited exposure to commercial real estate. However, our borrowers with commercial real estate exposure, whether they be local real estate developers in our commercial portfolio or customers in our niche portfolios such as aircraft whose underlying business is dependent on developing, marketing and managing real estate properties, have suffered as a result of declining real estate values and minimal sales activity. Furthermore, aircraft values declined during 2009, increasing the risk in aircraft secured transactions. Medium and heavy duty trucks are also a large exposure area for us. Medium and heavy duty trucks non-accrual loans and leases increased to $11.62 million as of December 31, 2009, up from $7.80 million as of December 31, 2008. The trucking industry has suffered from overcapacity, underutilization, aging fleets and declining collateral values which are expected to remain weak through 2011.

As of December 31, 2008, we had $0.29 million of loans classified as troubled debt restructuring. There were no loans classified as troubled debt restructurings at December 31, 2009.

- 21 -

Table of Contents

Nonperforming assets at December 31 (Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2007			2006			2005
Loans past due over 90 days	$	628		$	1,022		$	1,105		$	116		$	245
Nonaccrual loans and leases and restructured loans:
Commercial and agricultural loans		7,953			5,399			1,597			1,768			3,701
Auto, light truck and environmental equipment		9,200			709			507			481			812
Medium and heavy duty truck		11,624			7,801			277			1,755			17
Aircraft financing		6,024			9,975			1,846			8,219			7,641
Construction equipment financing		7,218			1,934			1,196			853			2,513
Loans secured by real estate		41,387			9,147			3,581			2,214			1,475
Consumer loans		131			1,590			1,132			285			393
Total nonaccrual loans and leases and restructured loans		83,537			36,555			10,136			15,575			16,552
Total nonperforming loans and leases		84,165			37,577			11,241			15,691			16,797
Other real estate		4,039			1,381			783			800			960
Former bank premises held for sale		2,490			3,356			4,038			-			-
Repossessions:
Commercial and agricultural loans		164			53			45			2			-
Auto, light truck and environmental equipment		336			226			183			178			128
Medium and heavy duty truck		-			1,248			54			-			-
Aircraft financing		9,391			16			1,850			300			4,073
Construction equipment financing		238			67			92			400			-
Consumer loans		36			59			67			95			83
Total repossessions		10,165			1,669			2,291			975			4,284
Operating leases		154			185			126			201			-
Total nonperforming assets	$	101,013		$	44,168		$	18,479		$	17,667		$	22,041
Nonperforming loans and leases to loans and leases,
net of unearned discount		2.72	%		1.14	%		0.35	%		0.58	%		0.68	%
Nonperforming assets to loans and leases and operating leases,
net of unearned discount		3.15	%		1.30	%		0.56	%		0.64	%		0.87	%

Potential Problem Loans — Potential problem loans consist of loans that are performing but for which management has concerns about the ability of a borrower to continue to comply with repayment terms because of the borrower’s potential operating or financial difficulties. Management monitors these loans closely and reviews their performance on a regular basis. As of December 31, 2009, we had $12.08 million in loans of this type which are not included in either of the non-accrual or 90 days past due loan categories. At December 31, 2009, potential problem loans consisted of seven credit relationships. Weakness in these companies' operating performance has caused us to heighten attention given to these credits.

Foreign Outstandings — Our foreign loan and lease outstandings denominated in U.S. dollars were $131.18 million and $88.03 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Foreign loans and leases are in aircraft financing. Loan and lease outstandings to borrowers in Brazil were $87.66 million and $54.52 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Outstanding balances to borrowers in other countries were insignificant.

Investment Portfolio

The amortized cost of securities at year-end 2009 increased 24.89% from 2008, following a 7.80% decrease from year-end 2007 to year-end 2008. The amortized cost of securities at December 31, 2009 was $893.44 million or 19.67% of total assets, compared to $715.38 million or 16.02% of total assets at December 31, 2008. The increase in the investment portfolio in 2009 was due to the investment of excess funds as deposit outstandings increased and loan outstandings decreased.

The amortized cost of securities available-for-sale as of December 31 is summarized as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	2009		2008		2007
U.S. Treasury and Federal agencies securities	$	390,189	$	293,461	$	284,214
U.S. States and political subdivisions securities		188,706		198,640		258,260
Mortgage-backed securities - Federal agencies		286,415		207,954		199,382
Corporate debt securities		26,166		10,494		6,631
Foreign government securities		675		435		665
Marketable equity securities		1,288		4,396		26,770
Total investment securities available-for-sale	$	893,439	$	715,380	$	775,922

- 22 -

Table of Contents

Yields on tax-exempt obligations are calculated on a fully tax equivalent basis assuming a 35% tax rate. The following table shows the maturities of securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2009, at the amortized costs and weighted average yields of such securities:

(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Yield
U.S. Treasury and Federal agencies securities
Under 1 year	$	20,004		0.92	%
1 – 5 years		228,239		2.60
5 – 10 years		141,946		3.45
Over 10 years		-		-
Total U.S. Treasury and Federal agencies securities		390,189		2.83
U.S. States and political subdivisions securities
Under 1 year		35,466		4.49
1 – 5 years		78,590		5.48
5 – 10 years		58,817		5.64
Over 10 years		15,833		1.26
Total U.S. States and political subdivisions securities		188,706		4.99
Corporate debt securities
Under 1 year		10,996		1.28
1 – 5 years		15,170		1.82
5 – 10 years		-		-
Over 10 years		-		-
Total Corporate debt securities		26,166		1.59
Foreign government securities
Under 1 year		100		4.05
1 – 5 years		575		3.77
5 – 10 years		-		-
Over 10 years		-		-
Total Foreign government securities		675		3.81
Mortgage-backed securities - Federal agencies		286,415		3.97
Marketable equity securities		1,288		9.45
Total investment securities available-for-sale	$	893,439		3.62	%

Deposits

The average daily amounts of deposits and rates paid on such deposits are summarized as follows:

	2009					2008					2007
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate
Noninterest bearing demand deposits	$	427,513		-	%	$	377,440		-	%	$	351,050		-	%
Interest bearing demand deposits		1,209,800		0.62			1,137,491		1.82			988,308		3.10
Savings deposits		325,801		0.29			285,538		0.63			250,927		1.21
Other time deposits		1,610,534		3.42			1,573,801		4.09			1,679,521		4.85
Total deposits	$	3,573,648				$	3,374,270				$	3,269,806

See Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on deposits.

- 23 -

Table of Contents

Short-Term Borrowings

The following table shows the distribution of our short-term borrowings and the weighted average interest rates thereon at the end of each of the last three years. Also provided are the maximum amount of borrowings and the average amount of borrowings, as well as weighted average interest rates for the last three years.

	Federal Funds
	Purchased and
	Security						Other
	Repurchase			Commercial			Short-Term			Total
(Dollars in thousands)	Agreements			Paper			Borrowings			Borrowings
2009
Balance at December 31, 2009	$	123,787		$	4,726		$	21,597		$	150,110
Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end		275,407			5,392			23,863			304,662
Average amount outstanding		161,529			4,048			20,070			185,647
Weighted average interest rate during the year		0.40	%		0.34	%		2.30	%		0.60	%
Weighted average interest rate for outstanding amounts at
December 31, 2009		0.25	%		0.43	%		1.80	%		0.48	%
2008
Balance at December 31, 2008	$	272,529		$	4,461		$	19,185		$	296,175
Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end		359,452			9,875			247,828			617,155
Average amount outstanding		270,503			7,694			108,653			386,850
Weighted average interest rate during the year		1.97	%		2.35	%		1.95	%		1.97	%
Weighted average interest rate for outstanding amounts at
December 31, 2008		0.49	%		0.29	%		2.92	%		0.65	%
2007
Balance at December 31, 2007	$	303,429		$	10,783		$	23,620		$	337,832
Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end		327,623			15,478			42,784			385,885
Average amount outstanding		246,792			12,598			11,987			271,377
Weighted average interest rate during the year		3.92	%		4.84	%		5.49	%		4.03	%
Weighted average interest rate for outstanding amounts at
December 31, 2007		2.98	%		4.04	%		2.60	%		2.99	%

Liquidity

Core Deposits — Our major source of investable funds is provided by stable core deposits consisting of all interest bearing and noninterest bearing deposits, excluding brokered certificates of deposit and certain certificates of deposit of $100,000 and over. In 2009, average core deposits equaled 68.13% of average total assets, compared to 66.31% in 2008 and 67.12% in 2007. The effective cost rate of core deposits in 2009 was 1.54%, compared to 2.36% in 2008 and 3.25% in 2007.

Average demand deposits (noninterest bearing core deposits) increased 13.27% in 2009 compared to an increase of 7.52% in 2008. These represented 13.93% of total core deposits in 2009, compared to 12.93% in 2008, and 12.60% in 2007.

Purchased Funds — We use purchased funds to supplement core deposits, which include certain certificates of deposit of $100,000 and over, brokered certificates of deposit, over-night borrowings, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, commercial paper, and other short-term borrowings. Purchased funds are raised from customers seeking short-term investments and are used to manage the Bank’s interest rate sensitivity. During 2009, our reliance on purchased funds decreased to 15.30% of average total assets from 19.16% in 2008.

Shareholders’ Equity — Average shareholders’ equity equated to 12.57% of average total assets in 2009 compared to 10.09% in 2008. Shareholders’ equity was 12.56% of total assets at year-end 2009, compared to 10.16% at year-end 2008. We include unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of income taxes, in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) which is a component of shareholders’ equity. While regulatory capital adequacy ratios exclude unrealized gains (losses), it does impact our equity as reported in the audited financial statements. The unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of income taxes, were $5.09 million and $5.82 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Our sale of preferred shares under the TARP Capital Purchase Program in January 2009 increased our shareholders' equity by $111.00 million. Our company plans to repay the TARP funding when the national economic conditions and their impact on our markets stabilize. The company maintains the cash and the capital necessary to pay the TARP back once we are sure there is a sustainable recovery and a low likelihood of another downward trend in the economy.

Liquidity Risk Management — The Bank's liquidity is monitored and closely managed by the Asset/Liability Management Committee (ALCO), whose members are comprised of the Bank's senior management. Asset and liability management includes the management of interest rate sensitivity and the maintenance of an adequate liquidity position. The purpose of interest rate sensitivity management is to stabilize net interest income during periods of changing interest rates.

Liquidity management is the process by which the Bank ensures that adequate liquid funds are available to meet financial commitments on a timely basis. Financial institutions must maintain liquidity to meet day-to-day requirements of depositors and borrowers, take advantage of market opportunities and provide a cushion against unforeseen needs.

- 24 -

Table of Contents

Liquidity of the Bank is derived primarily from core deposits, principal payments received on loans, the sale and maturity of investment securities, net cash provided by operating activities, and access to other funding sources. The most stable source of liability-funded liquidity is deposit growth and retention of the core deposit base. The principal source of asset-funded liquidity is available-for-sale investment securities, cash and due from banks, overnight investments, securities purchased under agreements to resell, and loans and interest bearing deposits with other banks maturing within one year. Additionally, liquidity is provided by repurchase agreements, and the ability to borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank.

Interest Rate Risk Management — ALCO monitors and manages the relationship of earning assets to interest bearing liabilities and the responsiveness of asset yields, interest expense, and interest margins to changes in market interest rates. In the normal course of business, we face ongoing interest rate risks and uncertainties. We occasionally utilize interest rate swaps to partially manage the primary market exposures associated with the interest rate risk related to underlying assets, liabilities, and anticipated transactions.

A hypothetical change in earnings was modeled by calculating an immediate 100 basis point (1.00%) change in interest rates across all maturities. At December 31, 2009, the aggregate hypothetical increase in pre-tax earnings was estimated to be $3.38 million on an annualized basis on all rate-sensitive financial instruments, based on a hypothetical increase of a 100 basis point change in interest rates and the aggregate hypothetical decrease in pre-tax earnings was estimated to be $6.67 million on an annualized basis on all rate-sensitive financial instruments based on a hypothetical decrease of a 100 basis point change in interest rates. At December 31, 2008, the aggregate hypothetical increase in pre-tax earnings was estimated to be $2.95 million on an annualized basis on all rate-sensitive financial instruments, based on a hypothetical increase of a 100 basis point change in interest rates and the aggregate hypothetical decrease in pre-tax earnings was estimated to be $9.94 million on an annualized basis on all rate-sensitive financial instruments based on a hypothetical decrease of a 100 basis point change in interest rates. The earnings simulation model excludes the earnings dynamics related to how fee income and noninterest expense may be affected by changes in interest rates. Actual results may differ materially from those projected. The use of this methodology to quantify the market risk of the balance sheet should not be construed as an endorsement of its accuracy or the accuracy of the related assumptions. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the impact of these hypothetical fluctuations in interest rates on our derivative holdings was not significant, and, as such, separate disclosure is not presented.

We manage the interest rate risk related to loan commitments by entering into contracts for future delivery of loans with outside parties. See Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

In the ordinary course of operations, we enter into certain contractual obligations. Such obligations include the funding of operations through debt issuances as well as leases for premises and equipment. The following table summarizes our significant fixed, determinable, and estimated contractual obligations, by payment date, at December 31, 2009, except for obligations associated with short-term borrowing arrangements. Payments for borrowings do not include interest. Further discussion of the nature of each obligation is included in the referenced note to the consolidated financial statements.

Contractual obligation payments by period follows:

											Indeterminate
(Dollars in thousands)	Note		0 – 1 Year		1 – 3 Years		3 – 5 Years		Over 5 Years		maturity		Total
Deposits without stated maturity		-	$	2,167,087	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	2,167,087
Certificates of deposit		-		1,006,850		362,101		102,175		14,251		-		1,485,377
Long-term debt		11		10,317		265		105		873		8,201		19,761
Subordinated notes		12		-		-		-		89,692		-		89,692
Operating leases		18		2,597		3,504		1,055		1,144		-		8,300
Purchase obligations		-		16,562		2,817		11		-		-		19,390
Total contractual obligations			$	3,203,413	$	368,687	$	103,346	$	105,960	$	8,201	$	3,789,607

We routinely enter into contracts for services. These contracts may require payment for services to be provided in the future and may also contain penalty clauses for early termination of the contract. We have made a diligent effort to estimate such payments and penalties, where applicable. Additionally, where necessary, we have made reasonable estimates as to certain purchase obligations as of December 31, 2009. Our management has used the best information available to make the estimations necessary to value the related purchase obligations. Our management is not aware of any additional commitments or contingent liabilities which may have a material adverse impact on our liquidity or capital resources at year-end 2009. In 2009, we incurred new long-term obligations under our preferred shares issued under the TARP Capital Purchase Program. See Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data —Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

We also enter into derivative contracts under which we are required to either receive cash from, or pay cash to, counterparties depending on changes in interest rates. Derivative contracts are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet with the fair value representing the net present value of expected future cash receipts or payments based on market interest rates as of the balance sheet date. The fair value of the contracts change daily as market interest rates change. Because the derivative assets and liabilities recorded on the balance sheet at December 31, 2009 do not necessarily represent the amounts that may ultimately be paid under these contracts, these assets and liabilities are not included in the table of contractual obligations presented above.

In addition, due to the uncertainty with respect to the timing of future cash flows associated the with our unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2009, we are unable to make reasonably reliable estimates of the period of cash settlement with the respective taxing authority. Therefore, $1.85 million of unrecognized tax benefits have been excluded from the contractual obligations table above. See Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion on income taxes.

Assets under management and assets under custody are held in fiduciary or custodial capacity for our clients. In accordance with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles, these assets are not included on our balance sheet.

We are also party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our clients. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Further discussion of these commitments is included in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Note 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 25 -

Table of Contents

Quarterly Results of Operations

The following table sets forth unaudited consolidated selected quarterly statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

Three Months Ended (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	March 31			June 30			September 30			December 31
2009
Interest income	$	50,676		$	50,630		$	49,741		$	49,365
Interest expense		19,954			18,717			17,695			15,834
Net interest income		30,722			31,913			32,046			33,531
Provision for loan and lease losses		7,785			8,487			6,469			8,360
Investment securities and other investment (losses) gains		(469	)		426			716			1,014
Income before income taxes		4,846			8,782			9,263			8,627
Net income		6,251			6,283			6,733			6,223
Net income available to common shareholders		4,938			4,587			5,032			4,517
Diluted net income per common share		0.20			0.19			0.21			0.19
2008
Interest income	$	62,124		$	58,579		$	58,065		$	56,540
Interest expense		29,827			25,455			24,668			23,198
Net interest income		32,297			33,124			33,397			33,342
Provision for loan and lease losses		1,539			4,493			3,571			7,045
Investment securities and other investment gains (losses)		623			(1,066	)		(8,816	)		(738	)
Income before income taxes		13,884			10,603			3,889			18,025
Net income		9,354			7,245			4,472			12,315
Net income available to common shareholders		9,354			7,245			4,472			12,315
Diluted net income per common share		0.38			0.30			0.18			0.50

Net income was $6.22 million for the fourth quarter of 2009, compared to the $12.32 million of net income reported for the fourth quarter of 2008. The 2008 fourth quarter net income was positively impacted by the sale of certain assets of 1st Source Corporation Investment Advisors to Wasatch Advisors, Inc. which resulted in an $11.49 million pre-tax (after-tax $7.14 million) gain. Diluted net income per common share for the fourth quarter of 2009 amounted to $0.19, compared to $0.50 per common share reported in the fourth quarter of 2008.

The net interest margin was 3.27% for the fourth quarter of 2009 versus 3.30% for the same period in 2008. Tax-equivalent net interest income was $34.49 million for the fourth quarter of 2009, up slightly from 2008’s fourth quarter.

Our provision for loan and lease losses was $8.36 million in the fourth quarter of 2009 compared to provision for loan and lease losses of $7.05 million in the fourth quarter of 2008. Net charge-offs were $5.63 million for the fourth quarter 2009, compared to net charge-offs of $2.88 million a year ago.

Noninterest income for the fourth quarter of 2009 was $22.02 million, compared to $30.23 million for the fourth quarter of 2008. The predominate factor causing the decrease was the sale of certain assets of Investment Advisors for a gain of $11.49 million in the fourth quarter 2008. This decrease was offset by an increase in investment securities and other investment gains and mortgage banking income. Noninterest expense for the fourth quarter of 2009 was $38.56 million and was relatively unchanged compared to the fourth quarter of 2008.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

For information regarding Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, see Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Interest Rate Risk Management.

- 26 -

Table of Contents

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of 1st Source Corporation

We have audited 1st Source Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). 1st Source Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, 1st Source Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of financial condition of 1st Source Corporation as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009 and our report dated February 19, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago, Illinois

February 19, 2010

- 27 -

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of 1st Source Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of 1st Source Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of 1st Source Corporation and subsidiaries at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), 1st Source Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 19, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago, Illinois

February 19, 2010

- 28 -

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

December 31 (Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008

ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	72,872		$	119,771
Federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits with other banks		141,166			6,951
Investment securities available-for-sale
(amortized cost of $893,439 and $715,380 at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)		901,638			724,754
Other investments		21,012			18,612
Trading account securities		125			100
Mortgages held for sale		26,649			46,686
Loans and leases, net of unearned discount:
Commercial and agricultural loans		546,222			643,440
Auto, light truck and environmental equipment		349,741			353,838
Medium and heavy duty truck		204,545			243,375
Aircraft financing		617,384			632,121
Construction equipment financing		313,300			375,983
Loans secured by real estate		952,223			918,749
Consumer loans		109,735			130,706
Total loans and leases		3,093,150			3,298,212
Reserve for loan and lease losses		(88,236	)		(79,776	)
Net loans and leases		3,004,914			3,218,436
Equipment owned under operating leases, net		97,004			83,062
Net premises and equipment		37,907			40,491
Goodwill and intangible assets		90,222			91,691
Accrued income and other assets		148,591			113,620
Total assets	$	4,542,100		$	4,464,174
LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Noninterest bearing	$	450,608		$	416,960
Interest bearing		3,201,856			3,097,582
Total deposits		3,652,464			3,514,542
Short-term borrowings:
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase		123,787			272,529
Other short-term borrowings		26,323			23,646
Total short-term borrowings		150,110			296,175
Long-term debt and mandatorily redeemable securities		19,761			29,832
Subordinated notes		89,692			89,692
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		59,753			80,269
Total liabilities		3,971,780			4,010,510
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock; no par value
Authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued 111,000 shares in 2009 and none in 2008		104,930			-
Common stock; no par value
Authorized 40,000,000 shares; issued 25,643,506 shares in 2009 and 2008		350,269			342,982
Retained earnings		142,407			136,877
Cost of common stock in treasury (1,532,483 shares in 2009 and 1,532,576 shares in 2008)		(32,380	)		(32,019	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		5,094			5,824
Total shareholders' equity		570,320			453,664
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	4,542,100		$	4,464,174

The accompanying notes are a part of the consolidated financial statements.

- 29 -

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2009			2008			2007
Interest income:
Loans and leases	$	174,885		$	204,006		$	216,186
Investment securities, taxable		17,594			22,170			25,136
Investment securities, tax-exempt		6,705			7,707			7,608
Other		1,228			1,425			4,657
Total interest income		200,412			235,308			253,587
Interest expense:
Deposits		63,521			86,903			115,113
Short-term borrowings		1,115			7,626			10,935
Subordinated notes		6,589			6,714			6,051
Long-term debt and mandatorily redeemable securities		975			1,905			2,578
Total interest expense		72,200			103,148			134,677
Net interest income		128,212			132,160			118,910
Provision for loan and lease losses		31,101			16,648			7,534
Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses		97,111			115,512			111,376
Noninterest income:
Trust fees		15,036			18,599			15,567
Service charges on deposit accounts		20,645			22,035			20,470
Mortgage banking income		8,251			2,994			2,868
Insurance commissions		4,930			5,363			4,666
Equipment rental income		25,757			24,224			21,312
Other income		9,224			9,293			8,864
Gain on sale of certain Investment Advisor assets		-			11,492			-
Investment securities and other investment gains (losses)		1,687			(9,997	)		(3,128	)
Total noninterest income		85,530			84,003			70,619
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		72,483			76,965			73,944
Net occupancy expense		9,185			9,698			9,030
Furniture and equipment expense		13,980			15,095			15,145
Depreciation - leased equipment		20,515			19,450			17,085
Professional fees		4,399			8,446			4,575
Supplies and communications		5,916			6,782			5,987
Business development and marketing expense		3,488			3,749			4,788
Loan and lease collection and repossession expense		4,283			1,162			1,123
FDIC and other insurance		8,362			2,601			1,190
Other expense		8,512			9,166			7,445
Total noninterest expense		151,123			153,114			140,312
Income before income taxes		31,518			46,401			41,683
Income taxes		6,028			13,015			11,144
Net income		25,490			33,386			30,539
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion		(6,416	)		-			-
Net income available to common shareholders	$	19,074		$	33,386		$	30,539
Basic net income per common share	$	0.79		$	1.38		$	1.30
Diluted net income per common share	$	0.79		$	1.37		$	1.28

The accompanying notes are a part of the consolidated financial statements.

- 30 -

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
											Cost of			Accumulated
											Common			Other
				Preferred		Common		Retained			Stock			Comprehensive
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	Total			Stock		Stock		Earnings			in Treasury			Income (Loss), Net
Balance at January 1, 2007	$	368,904		$	-	$	289,163	$	99,572		$	(19,571	)	$	(260	)
Comprehensive income, net of tax:
Net income		30,539			-		-		30,539			-			-
Change in unrealized appreciation of
available-for-sale securities, net of tax		2,782			-		-		-			-			2,782
Total comprehensive income		33,321			-		-		-			-			-
Issuance of 40,349 common shares per
stock based compensation awards, including
related tax effects		545			-		-		384			161			-
Cost of 569,310 shares of common
stock acquired for treasury		(12,821	)		-		-		-			(12,821	)		-
Common stock dividend ($.560 per share)		(13,122	)		-		-		(13,122	)		-			-
Issuance of 2,124,974 shares of common
stock for FINA Bancorp purchase		53,677			-		53,677		-			-			-
Balance at December 31, 2007	$	430,504		$	-	$	342,840	$	117,373		$	(32,231	)	$	2,522
Comprehensive income, net of tax:
Net income		33,386			-		-		33,386			-			-
Change in unrealized appreciation of
available-for-sale securities, net of tax		3,302			-		-		-			-			3,302
Total comprehensive income		36,688			-		-		-			-			-
Issuance of 18,820 common shares per
stock based compensation awards, including
related tax effects		341			-		-		129			212			-
Stock based compensation		142			-		142		-			-			-
Common stock dividend ($.580 per share)		(14,011	)		-		-		(14,011	)		-			-
Balance at December 31, 2008	$	453,664		$	-	$	342,982	$	136,877		$	(32,019	)	$	5,824
Comprehensive income, net of tax:
Net income		25,490			-		-		25,490			-			-
Change in unrealized appreciation of
available-for-sale securities, net of tax		(730	)		-		-		-			-			(730	)
Total comprehensive income		24,760			-		-		-			-			-
Issuance of 83,402 common shares per
stock based compensation awards, including
related tax effects		1,663			-		-		725			938			-
Cost of 83,309 shares of common
stock acquired for treasury		(1,299	)		-		-		-			(1,299	)		-
Issuance of preferred stock		103,725			103,725		-		-			-			-
Preferred stock discount accretion		-			1,205		-		(1,205	)		-			-
Issuance of warrants to purchase common stock		7,275			-		7,275		-			-			-
Preferred stock dividend (accrued and/or paid)		(5,211	)		-		-		(5,211	)		-			-
Stock based compensation		12			-		12		-			-			-
Common stock dividend ($.590 per share)		(14,269	)		-		-		(14,269	)		-			-
Balance at December 31, 2009	$	570,320		$	104,930	$	350,269	$	142,407		$	(32,380	)	$	5,094

The accompanying notes are a part of the consolidated financial statements.

- 31 -

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW

Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2007
Operating activities:
Net income	$	25,490		$	33,386		$	30,539
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan and lease losses		31,101			16,648			7,534
Depreciation of premises and equipment		4,605			5,312			5,364
Depreciation of equipment owned and leased to others		20,515			19,450			17,085
Amortization of investment security premiums and accretion of discounts, net		5,304			2,232			(356	)
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights		3,331			2,838			2,403
Mortgage servicing asset (recoveries)/impairment		(2,072	)		1,913			143
Deferred income taxes		5,687			(10,779	)		(4,558	)
Realized investment securities (gains) losses		(1,687	)		9,997			3,128
Originations/purchases of loans held for sale, net of principal collected		(577,949	)		(380,920	)		(327,679	)
Proceeds from the sales of loans held for sale		602,126			362,444			352,114
Net gain on sale of loans held for sale		(4,140	)		(2,289	)		(197	)
Change in trading account securities		(25	)		(100	)		-
Change in interest receivable		1,723			1,383			(1,296	)
Change in interest payable		(3,944	)		(6,710	)		(380	)
Change in other assets		(37,069	)		(15,980	)		(8,587	)
Change in other liabilities		(21,937	)		21,345			4,003
Other		794			4,070			5,101
Net change in operating activities		51,853			64,240			84,361
Investing activities:
Cash paid for acquisition, net		-			-			(55,977	)
Proceeds from sales of investment securities		240,325			8,548			121,671
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities		515,216			519,847			496,324
Purchases of investment securities		(937,217	)		(480,082	)		(518,041	)
Net change in short-term and other investments		(136,615	)		15,191			195,337
Loans sold or participated to others		17,805			-			-
Net change in loans and leases		164,616			(110,246	)		(252,929	)
Net change in equipment owned under operating leases		(34,457	)		(20,552	)		(22,734	)
Purchases of premises and equipment		(2,256	)		(3,726	)		(14,467	)
Net change in investing activities		(172,583	)		(71,020	)		(50,816	)
Financing activities:
Net change in demand deposits, NOW accounts and savings accounts		317,699			(72,780	)		(14,260	)
Net change in certificates of deposit		(179,777	)		117,659			(86,502	)
Net change in short-term borrowings		(146,065	)		(41,656	)		96,930
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		1,014			10,826			1,159
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated notes		-			-			58,764
Payments on subordinated notes		-			(10,310	)		(17,784	)
Payments on long-term debt		(11,382	)		(16,413	)		(11,225	)
Net proceeds from issuance of treasury stock		1,663			341			545
Acquisition of treasury stock		(1,299	)		-			(12,821	)
Net proceeds from issuance of preferred stock & common stock warrants		111,000			-			-
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock		(4,502	)		-			-
Cash dividends paid on common stock		(14,520	)		(14,253	)		(13,345	)
Net change in financing activities		73,831			(26,586	)		1,461
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(46,899	)		(33,366	)		35,006
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		119,771			153,137			118,131
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	72,872		$	119,771		$	153,137
Supplemental Information:
Cash paid for:
Interest	$	76,145		$	109,858		$	137,397
Income taxes		8,903			19,187			13,314
The accompanying notes are a part of the consolidated financial statements.

- 32 -

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 — Accounting Policies

1st Source Corporation is a bank holding company headquartered in South Bend, Indiana that provides, through our subsidiaries (collectively referred to as "1st Source"), a broad array of financial products and services. 1st Source Bank ("Bank"), our banking subsidiary, offers commercial and consumer banking services, trust and investment management services, and insurance to individual and business clients in Indiana and Michigan. The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

Basis of Presentation — The financial statements consolidate 1st Source and our subsidiaries (principally the Bank). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. For purposes of the parent company only financial information presented in Note 22, investments in subsidiaries are carried at equity in our underlying net assets.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements — Financial statements prepared in accordance with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles require our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Business Combinations — Business combinations are accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Under the purchase method, assets and liabilities of the business acquired are recorded at their estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition with any excess of the cost of the acquisition over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired recorded as goodwill. Results of operations of the acquired business are included in the income statement from the date of acquisition.

Cash Flow — For purposes of the consolidated and parent company only statements of cash flows, we consider cash and due from banks as cash and cash equivalents.

Securities — Securities that we have the ability and positive intent to hold to maturity are classified as investment securities held-to-maturity. Held-to-maturity investment securities, when present, are carried at amortized cost. As of December 31, 2009, we hold no securities classified as held-to-maturity. Securities that may be sold in response to, or in anticipation of, changes in interest rates and resulting prepayment risk, or for other factors, are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on these securities are reported, net of applicable taxes, as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in shareholders’ equity.

The initial indication of other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) for both debt and equity securities is a decline in fair value below amortized cost. Quarterly, the impaired securities are analyzed on a qualitative and quantitative basis in determining OTTI. Declines in the fair value of available-for-sale debt securities below their cost that are deemed to be other-than-temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses to the extent the impairment is related to credit losses. The amount of impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. In estimating OTTI impairment losses, we consider among other things, (i) the length of time and the extent to which fair value has been less than cost, (ii) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (iii) whether it is more likely than not that we will not have to sell any such securities before an anticipated recovery of cost.

Debt and equity securities that are purchased and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term are classified as trading account securities and are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported in earnings. Realized gains and losses on the sales of all securities are reported in earnings and computed using the specific identification cost basis.

Other investments consist solely of shares of Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock. These investments are carried at cost and reviewed for impairment at least annually or sooner if events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be reasonable. When evaluating the stocks for impairment, the value is determined based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. Both cash and stock dividends received on the stocks are reported as income.

Loans and Leases — Loans are stated at the principal amount outstanding, net of unamortized deferred loan origination fees and costs and net of unearned income. Interest income is accrued as earned based on unpaid principal balances. Origination fees and direct loan and lease origination costs are deferred and the net amount amortized to interest income over the estimated life of the related loan or lease. Loan commitment fees are deferred and amortized into other income over the commitment period.

Direct financing leases are carried at the aggregate of lease payments plus estimated residual value of the leased property, less unearned income. Interest income on direct financing leases is recognized over the term of the lease to achieve a constant periodic rate of return on the outstanding investment.

The accrual of interest on loans and leases is discontinued when a loan or lease becomes contractually delinquent for 90 days, or when an individual analysis of a borrower's credit worthiness indicates a credit should be placed on nonperforming status, except for residential mortgage loans and consumer loans that are well secured and in the process of collection. Residential mortgage loans are placed in nonaccrual at the time the loan is placed in foreclosure. When interest accruals are discontinued, interest credited to income in the current year is reversed and interest accrued in the prior year is charged to the reserve for loan and lease losses. However, in some cases, management may elect to continue the accrual of interest when the net realizable value of collateral is sufficient to cover the principal and accrued interest. When a loan or lease is classified as nonaccrual and the future collectibility of the recorded loan or lease balance is doubtful, collections on interest and principal are applied as a reduction to principal outstanding. Loans are returned to accrual status when all principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

A loan or lease is considered impaired, based on current information and events, if it is probable that we will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan or lease agreement. Interest on impaired loans and leases, which are not classified as nonaccrual, is recognized on the accrual basis. We evaluate loans and leases exceeding $100,000 for impairment and establish an allowance as a component of the reserve for loan and lease losses when it is probable all amounts due will not be collected pursuant to the contractual terms of the loan and lease and the recorded investment in the loan or lease exceeds its fair value.

- 33 -

Table of Contents

1st Source Bank sells mortgage loans to the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) in the normal course of business and retains the servicing rights. The GNMA programs under which the loans are sold allow us to repurchase individual delinquent loans that meet certain criteria from the securitized loan pool. At our option, and without GNMA's prior authorization, we may repurchase a delinquent loan for an amount equal to 100% of the remaining principal balance on the loan. Once we have the unconditional ability to repurchase a delinquent loan, we are deemed to have regained effective control over the loan and we are required to recognize the loan on our balance sheet and record an offsetting liability, regardless of our intent to repurchase the loan. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, residential real estate portfolio loans included $8.70 million and $5.72 million, respectively, of loans available for repurchase under the GNMA optional repurchase programs with the offsetting liability recorded within other short-term borrowings.

Mortgage Banking Activities — Loans held for sale are primarily composed of performing one-to-four family residential mortgage loans originated for resale. Prior to January 1, 2008, all loans held for sale were carried at the lower of cost or fair value as determined on an aggregate basis. Effective January 1, 2008, management has elected to carry mortgage loans originated with the intent to sell at fair value.

We recognize the rights to service mortgage loans for others as separate assets, whether the servicing rights are acquired through a separate purchase or through the sale of originated loans with servicing rights retained. We allocate a portion of the total cost of a mortgage loan to servicing rights based on the fair value. These assets are amortized as reductions of mortgage servicing fee income over the estimated servicing period in proportion to the estimated servicing income to be received. Gains and losses on the sale of mortgage servicing rights are recognized as noninterest income in the period in which such rights are sold.

Mortgage servicing assets are evaluated for impairment. For purposes of impairment measurement, mortgage servicing assets are stratified based on the predominant risk characteristics of the underlying servicing, principally by loan type and interest rate. If temporary impairment exists within a tranche, a valuation allowance is established through a charge to income equal to the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value. If it is later determined all or a portion of the temporary impairment no longer exists for a particular tranche, the valuation allowance is reduced through a recovery of income.

Mortgage servicing assets are also reviewed for other-than-temporary impairment. Other-than-temporary impairment exists when recoverability of a recorded valuation allowance is determined to be remote considering historical and projected interest rates, prepayments, and loan pay-off activity. When this situation occurs, the unrecoverable portion of the valuation allowance is applied as a direct write-down to the carrying value of the mortgage servicing asset. Unlike a valuation allowance, a direct write-down permanently reduces the carrying value of the mortgage servicing asset and the valuation allowance, precluding subsequent recoveries.

As part of mortgage banking operations, we enter into commitments to purchase or originate loans whereby the interest rate on these loans is determined prior to funding ("rate lock commitments"). Similar to loans held for sale, the fair value of rate lock commitments is subject to change primarily due to changes in interest rates. Under our risk management policy, these fair values are hedged primarily by selling forward contracts on agency securities. The rate lock commitments on mortgage loans intended to be sold and the related hedging instruments are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in current earnings.

Reserve for Loan and Lease Losses — The reserve for loan and lease losses is maintained at a level believed to be adequate by management to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. The determination of the reserve requires significant judgment reflecting management’s best estimate of probable loan and lease losses related to specifically identified impaired loans and leases as well as probable losses in the remainder of the various loan and lease portfolios. The methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the reserve consists of several key elements, which include: specific reserves for impaired loans, percentage allocations for special attention loans and leases (classified loans and leases and internal watch list credits) without specific reserves, formula reserves for each business lending division portfolio, and reserves for pooled homogenous loans and leases. Management’s evaluation is based upon a continuing review of these portfolios, estimates of customer performance, collateral values and dispositions, and assessments of economic and geopolitical events, all of which are subject to judgment and will change.

Specific reserves are established for certain business and specialty finance credits based on a regular analysis of special attention loans and leases. This analysis is performed by the Credit Policy Committee, the Loan Review Department, Credit Administration, and the Loan Workout Departments. The specific reserves are based on an analysis of underlying collateral values, cash flow considerations and, if applicable, guarantor capacity.

The formula reserves determined for each business lending division portfolio are calculated quarterly by applying loss factors to outstanding loans and leases and certain unfunded commitments based upon a review of historical loss experience and qualitative factors, which include but are not limited to, economic trends, current market risk assessment by industry, recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolios, movement in equipment values collateralizing specialized industry portfolios, concentrations of credit, delinquencies, trends in volume, experience and depth of relationship managers and division management, and the effects of changes in lending policies and practices, including changes in quality of the loan and lease origination, servicing and risk management processes. Special attention loans and leases without specific reserves receive a higher percentage allocation ratio than credits not considered special attention.

Pooled loans and leases are smaller credits and are homogenous in nature, such as consumer credits and residential mortgages. Pooled loan and lease loss reserves are based on historical net charge-offs, adjusted for delinquencies, the effects of lending practices and programs and current economic conditions, and current trends in the geographic markets which we serve.

A comprehensive analysis of the reserve is performed by management on a quarterly basis. Although management determines the amount of each element of the reserve separately and relies on this process as an important credit management tool, the entire reserve is available for the entire loan and lease portfolio. The actual amount of losses incurred can vary significantly from the estimated amounts both positively and negatively. Management’s methodology includes several factors intended to minimize the difference between estimated and actual losses. These factors allow management to adjust our estimate of losses based on the most recent information available.

Loans and leases, which are deemed uncollectible or have a low likelihood of collection, are charged off and deducted from the reserve, while recoveries of amounts previously charged off are credited to the reserve. A (recovery of) provision for loan and lease losses is credited or charged to operations based on management’s periodic evaluation of the factors previously mentioned, as well as other pertinent factors.

Equipment Owned Under Operating Leases — We finance various types of construction equipment, medium and heavy duty trucks, and automobiles under leases classified as operating leases. Revenue consists of the contractual lease payments and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Lease terms range from three to seven years. Leased assets are being depreciated on a straight-line method over the lease term to the estimate of the equipment’s fair market value at lease termination, also referred to as "residual" value. For automobile leases, fair value was based upon published industry market guides. For other equipment leases, fair value may be based upon observable market prices, third-party valuations, or prices received on sales of similar assets at the end of the lease term. These residual values are reviewed periodically to ensure the recorded amount does not exceed the fair market value at the lease termination.

- 34 -

Table of Contents

Other Real Estate — Other real estate acquired through partial or total satisfaction of nonperforming loans is included in other assets and recorded at the estimated fair value less anticipated selling costs based upon the property’s appraised value at the date of transfer, with any difference between the fair value of the property less cost to sell, and the carrying value of the loan charged to the reserve for loan losses. Other real estate also includes bank premises qualifying as held for sale. Bank premises are transferred at the lower of carrying value or estimated fair value less anticipated selling costs. Fair value write-downs, property maintenance costs, and gains or losses recognized upon the sale of foreclosed assets are recognized in noninterest expense on the income statement. Gains or losses not previously recognized resulting from the sale of other real estate are recognized on the date of sale. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, other real estate had carrying values of $6.53 million and $4.74 million, respectively, and is included in Other Assets in the Statements of Financial Condition.

Repossessed Assets — Repossessed assets may include fixtures and equipment, inventory and receivables, aircraft, construction equipment, and vehicles acquired through foreclosure or in lieu of foreclosure from our business banking activities and our specialty finance activities. Repossessed assets are included in other assets at the lower of cost or fair value of the equipment or vehicle. At the time of foreclosure, the recorded amount of the loan or lease is written down, if necessary, to the fair value of the equipment or vehicle by a charge to the reserve for loan and lease losses. Subsequent write-downs are included in noninterest expense. Gains or losses not previously recognized resulting from the sale of repossessed assets are recognized on the date of sale. Repossessed assets totaled $10.17 million and $1.67 million, as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and is included in Other Assets in the Statements of Financial Condition.

Premises and Equipment — Premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. The provision for depreciation is computed by the straight-line method, primarily with useful lives ranging from three to 31.5 years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred, while improvements, which extend the useful life, are capitalized and depreciated over the estimated remaining life.

Goodwill and Intangibles — Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of businesses acquired over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Other intangible assets represent purchased assets that also lack physical substance but can be distinguished from goodwill because of contractual or other legal rights or because the asset is capable of being sold or exchanged either on its own or in combination with a related contract, asset, or liability. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment at least annually or on an interim basis if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the carrying amount. Intangible assets that have finite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives and are subject to impairment testing. All of our other intangible assets have finite lives and are amortized on a straight-line basis over varying periods not exceeding eight years. We performed the required annual impairment test of goodwill during the first quarter of 2009 and determined that no impairment exists.

Venture Capital Investment — We account for our investments in venture capital partnerships for which we own three percent or more of the partnership on the equity method. The venture capital partnerships which we have investments in account for their investments at fair value pursuant to the guidance in the AICPA Investment Company Guide. As a result, our investments in these venture capital partnerships reflect the underlying fair value of the partnerships’ investments. We account for our investments in venture capital partnerships of which we own less than three percent at the lower of cost or fair value. Venture capital investments in partnerships are included in Other Assets in the Statements of Financial Condition. The balances as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $1.77 million and $1.86 million, respectively.

Short-Term Borrowings — Short-term borrowings consist of Federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, commercial paper, U.S. Treasury demand notes, Federal Home Loan Bank notes, and borrowings from non-affiliated banks. Federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and other short-term borrowings mature within one to 365 days of the transaction date. Commercial paper matures within seven to 270 days. Other short-term borrowings in the Statements of Financial Condition include our liability related to mortgage loans available for repurchase under GNMA optional repurchase programs.

Securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under agreements to repurchase are treated as collateralized financing transactions and are recorded at the amounts at which the securities were acquired or sold plus accrued interest. The fair value of collateral either received from or provided to a third party is continually monitored and additional collateral obtained or requested to be returned to us as deemed appropriate.

Trust Fees — Trust fees are recognized on the accrual basis.

Income Taxes — 1st Source and our subsidiaries file a consolidated Federal income tax return. The provision for incomes taxes is based upon income in the consolidated financial statements, rather than amounts reported on our income tax return. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized as income or expense in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the expected amount most likely to be realized. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of a sufficient level of future taxable income and recoverable taxes paid in prior years. Although realization is not assured, we believe it is more likely than not that all of the deferred tax assets will be realized.

Positions taken in our tax returns may be subject to challenge by the taxing authorities upon examination. Uncertain tax positions are initially recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Such tax positions are both initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement with the tax authority, assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. We provide for interest and, in some cases, penalties on tax positions that may be challenged by the taxing authorities. Interest expense is recognized beginning in the first period that such interest would begin accruing. Penalties are recognized in the period that we claim the position in the tax return. Interest and penalties on income tax uncertainties are classified within income tax expense in the Statements of Income.

Net Income Per Common Share — Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding, plus the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and nonvested stock-based compensation awards.

Stock-Based Employee Compensation — We recognize stock-based compensation as compensation cost in the Statements of Income based on their fair values on the measurement date, which, for our purposes, is the date of grant. We transitioned to fair-value based accounting for stock-based compensation using the modified prospective application and, therefore, have not restated results for prior periods. This transition method applies to new awards for service periods beginning on or after January 1, 2006, and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after January 1, 2006. Additionally, compensation cost for the portion of stock option awards for which the requisite service has not been rendered (generally referring to non-vested award) which were granted prior to January 1, 2006 will be recognized as the remaining requisite service is rendered.

- 35 -

Table of Contents

Segment Information — In our management's opinion, 1st Source has one principal business segment, commercial banking. While our chief decision makers monitor the revenue streams of various products and services, the identifiable segments' operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a company-wide basis. Accordingly, all of our financial service operations are considered by management to be aggregated in one reportable operating segment.

Derivative Financial Instruments — We occasionally enter into derivative financial instruments as part of our interest rate risk management strategies. These derivative financial instruments consist primarily of interest rate swaps. All derivative instruments are recorded on the Statements of Financial Condition, as either an asset or liability, at their fair value. The accounting for the gain or loss resulting from the change in fair value depends on the intended use of the derivative. For a derivative used to hedge changes in fair value of a recognized asset or liability, or an unrecognized firm commitment, the gain or loss on the derivative will be recognized in earnings together with the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item. This results in an earnings impact only to the extent that the hedge is ineffective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value. If it is determined that the derivative instrument is not highly effective as a hedge, hedge accounting is discontinued and the adjustment to fair value of the derivative instrument is recorded in earnings. For a derivative used to hedge changes in cash flows associated with forecasted transactions, the gain or loss on the effective portion of the derivative will be deferred, and reported as accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of shareholders’ equity, until such time the hedged transaction affects earnings. For derivative instruments not accounted for as hedges, changes in fair value are recognized in noninterest income/expense. Deferred gains and losses from derivatives that are terminated and were in a cash flow hedge are amortized over the shorter of the original remaining term of the derivative or the remaining life of the underlying asset or liability.

Fair Value Measurements — We record certain assets and liabilities at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Securities available for sale, trading securities, mortgage loans held for sale, and derivative instruments are carried at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurements are also utilized to determine the initial value of certain assets and liabilities, to perform impairment assessments, and for disclosure purposes. We use quoted market prices and observable inputs to the maximum extent possible when measuring fair value. In the absence of quoted market prices, various valuation techniques are utilized to measure fair value. When possible, observable market data for identical or similar financial instruments are used in the valuation. When market data is not available, fair value is determined using valuation models that incorporate management’s estimates of the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Fair value measurements are classified within one of three levels based on the observability of the inputs used to determine fair value, as follows:

Level 1 — The valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments.

Level 2 — The valuation is based on observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.

Level 3 — The valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by minimal or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the instrument. Level 3 valuations are typically performed using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques that incorporate management’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instrument, or valuations that require significant management judgment or estimation.

Reclassifications — Certain amounts in the prior period consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on total assets, shareholders’ equity or net income as previously reported.

Note 2 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Consolidations: In December 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-17 (formerly Statement No. 167), “Consolidations (Topic 810) – Improvements to Financial Reporting for Enterprises involved with Variable Interest Entities”. ASU 2009-17 amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities. The amendments to the consolidation guidance affect all entities, as well as qualifying special-purpose entities (QSPEs) that are currently excluded from previous consolidation guidance. ASU 2009-17 is effective as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009. ASU 2009-17 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, or disclosures.

Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets: In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-16 (formerly Statement No. 166), “Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) – Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets”. ASU 2009-16 amends the derecognition accounting and disclosure guidance. ASU 2009-16 eliminates the exemption from consolidation for QSPEs and also requires a transferor to evaluate all existing QSPEs to determine whether they must be consolidated. ASU 2009-16 is effective as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009. ASU 2009-16 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, or disclosures.

Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share: In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-12, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) – Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or its Equivalent)”. This ASU permits, as a practical expedient, a reporting entity to measure the fair value of an investment that is within the scope of the amendments in this ASU on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent) if the net asset value of the investment (or its equivalent) is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of Financial Services – Investment Companies (Topic 946) as of the reporting entity’s measurement date. The ASU also requires disclosures by major category of investment about the attributes of investments within the scope of the Update. ASU 2009-12 was effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. ASU 2009-05 did not have an impact on our financial condition, results of operations, or disclosures.

Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value: In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-05, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) – Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value”. This ASU provides amendments for fair value measurements of liabilities. It provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more techniques. ASU 2009-05 also clarifies that when estimating a fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. ASU 2009-05 was effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after issuance or fourth quarter 2009. ASU 2009-05 did not have an impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (ASC or Codification): In June 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-01 (formerly Statement No. 168), “Topic 105 - Generally Accepted Accounting Principles - FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” The Codification is the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The Codification does not change current GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. All existing accounting standard documents are superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the Codification is considered nonauthoritative.

- 36 -

Table of Contents

The Codification was effective for interim or annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. We have made the appropriate changes to GAAP references in our financial statements.

Subsequent Events: In May 2009, the FASB issued ASC 855 (formerly Statement No. 165), “Subsequent Events”. ASC 855 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the Statement of Financial Condition date but before financial statements are issued or available to be issued. We adopted the provisions of ASC 855 and this change is reflected in Note 23 - Subsequent Events.

FASB Amends Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments: In April 2009, the FASB issued ASC 825 (formerly FASB Staff Position (FSP) 107-1 and APB 28-1), “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” ASC 825 requires a public entity to provide disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial information. We adopted the provisions of ASC 825 on April 1, 2009 and included the appropriate disclosures in our quarterly reports.

FASB Clarifies Other-Than-Temporary Impairment: In April 2009, the FASB issued ASC 320 (formerly FSP FAS 115-2, FAS124-2 and EITF 99-20-2), “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary-Impairment.” ASC 320 (i) changes existing guidance for determining whether an impairment is other than temporary to debt securities and (ii) replaces the existing requirement that the entity’s management assert it has both the intent and ability to hold an impaired security until recovery with a requirement that management assert: (a) it does not have the intent to sell the security; and (b) it is more likely than not it will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis. Under ASC 320, declines in the fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses to the extent the impairment is related to credit losses. The amount of impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. We adopted the provisions of ASC 320 on April 1, 2009. Details related to the adoption of ASC 320 and the impact on our disclosures are more fully discussed in Note 3 – Investment Securities. The provisions of ASC 320 did not have an impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

FASB Clarifies Application of Fair Value Accounting: In April 2009, the FASB issued ASC 820 (formerly FSP FAS 157-4), “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly.” ASC 820 affirms the objective of fair value when a market is not active, clarifies and includes additional factors for determining whether there has been a significant decrease in market activity, eliminates the presumption that all transactions are not distressed unless proven otherwise, and requires an entity to disclose a change in valuation technique. We adopted the provisions of ASC 820 on April 1, 2009. The provisions of ASC 820 did not have an impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

Earnings Per Share (EPS): In June 2008, the FASB issued ASC 260 (formerly FSP EITF 03-6-1), “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Shared-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities.” ASC 260 clarifies that unvested share-based payment awards with a right to receive nonforfeitable dividends are participating securities. ASC 260 also provides guidance on how to allocate earnings to participating securities and compute EPS using the two-class method. ASC 260 was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. All prior-period EPS data presented shall be adjusted retrospectively (including interim financial statements, summaries of earnings, and selected financial data) to conform with the provisions of ASC 260. The provisions of ASC 260 did not have a material impact on our EPS calculation.

Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities: In March 2008, the FASB issued ASC 815 (formerly Statement No. 161), “Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”. ASC 815 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. We adopted the provisions of ASC 815 on January 1, 2009. The required disclosures are included in Note 19– Derivative Financial Instruments.

Note 3 — Investment Securities

Investment securities available-for-sale were as follows:

	Amortized		Gross		Gross
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
December 31, 2009
U.S. Treasury and Federal agencies securities	$	390,189	$	760	$	(1,780	)	$	389,169
U.S. States and political subdivisions securities		188,706		5,450		(2,337	)		191,819
Mortgage-backed securities - Federal agencies		286,415		5,996		(1,434	)		290,977
Corporate debt securities		26,166		194		(38	)		26,322
Foreign government securities		675		-		-			675
Total debt securities		892,151		12,400		(5,589	)		898,962
Marketable equity securities		1,288		1,417		(29	)		2,676
Total investment securities available-for-sale	$	893,439	$	13,817	$	(5,618	)	$	901,638
December 31, 2008
U.S. Treasury and Federal agencies securities	$	293,461	$	2,892	$	(2	)	$	296,351
U.S. States and political subdivisions securities		198,640		3,995		(1,686	)		200,949
Mortgage-backed securities - Federal agencies		207,954		3,553		(1,499	)		210,008
Corporate debt securities		10,494		51		(1	)		10,544
Foreign government securities		435		-		-			435
Total debt securities		710,984		10,491		(3,188	)		718,287
Marketable equity securities		4,396		2,091		(20	)		6,467
Total investment securities available-for-sale	$	715,380	$	12,582	$	(3,208	)	$	724,754

- 37 -

Table of Contents

At December 31, 2009, the residential mortgage-backed securities we held consisted primarily of GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC pass-through certificates which are guaranteed by those respective agencies of the United States government (or Government Sponsored Enterprise, GSEs).

At December 31, 2009, we held no preferred equity securities. At December 31, 2009, we held $3.11 million (amortized cost) in preferred equity securities which were included in marketable equity securities of which only $159 thousand were GSEs.

The contractual maturities of investments in securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2009, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities, because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	Amortized
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	66,566	$	66,962
Due after one year through five years		322,574		326,082
Due after five years through ten years		200,763		201,095
Due after ten years		15,833		13,846
Mortgage-backed securities		286,415		290,977
Total debt securities available for sale	$	892,151	$	898,962

The following table shows the gross realized gains and losses on sale of securities from the securities available-for-sale portfolio, including marketable equity securities.

(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2007
Gross realized gains	$	2,108		$	830		$	1,057
Gross realized losses		(707	)		(11,050	)		(4,119	)
Net realized gains (losses)	$	1,401		$	(10,220	)	$	(3,062	)

The gross losses in 2008 and 2007 reflect OTTI writedowns of $10.82 million and $4.11 million, respectively, on FNMA, FHLMC, Farmer Mac common stock and other corporate preferred stock. There have been no OTTI writedowns in 2009.

There were net gains of $25 thousand and $0 recorded on $0.13 million and $0.10 million in trading securities outstanding at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

The following tables summarize our gross unrealized losses and fair value by investment category and age:

	Less than 12 Months					12 months or Longer					Total
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
December 31, 2009
U.S. Treasury and Federal agencies securities	$	245,921	$	(1,780	)	$	-	$	-		$	245,921	$	(1,780	)
U.S. States and political subdivisions securities		9,501		(178	)		16,718		(2,159	)		26,219		(2,337	)
Mortgage-backed securities - Federal agencies		90,592		(1,137	)		22,330		(297	)		112,922		(1,434	)
Corporate debt securities		7,149		(38	)		-		-			7,149		(38	)
Total debt securities		353,163		(3,133	)		39,048		(2,456	)		392,211		(5,589	)
Marketable equity securities		2		(2	)		4		(27	)		6		(29	)
Total temporarily impaired available-for-sale securities	$	353,165	$	(3,135	)	$	39,052	$	(2,483	)	$	392,217	$	(5,618	)

December 31, 2008
U.S. Treasury and Federal agencies securities	$	19,998	$	(2	)	$	-	$	-		$	19,998	$	(2	)
U.S. States and political subdivisions securities		29,594		(1,686	)		-		-			29,594		(1,686	)
Mortgage-backed securities - Federal agencies		14,840		(229	)		34,721		(1,270	)		49,561		(1,499	)
Corporate debt securities		493		(1	)		-		-			493		(1	)
Total debt securities		64,925		(1,918	)		34,721		(1,270	)		99,646		(3,188	)
Marketable equity securities		11		(18	)		2		(2	)		13		(20	)
Total temporarily impaired available-for-sale securities	$	64,936	$	(1,936	)	$	34,723	$	(1,272	)	$	99,659	$	(3,208	)

At December 31, 2009, we do not have the intent to sell any of the available-for-sale securities in the table above and believe that it is more likely than not that we will not have to sell any such securities before an anticipated recovery of cost. The unrealized losses are due to increases in market interest rates over the yields available at the time the underlying securities were purchased and market illiquidity on adjustable rate coupon securities which are reflected in U.S. States and Political subdivisions. The fair value is expected to recover on all debt securities as they approach their maturity date or repricing date or if market yields for such investments decline. We do not believe any of the securities are impaired due to reasons of credit quality. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2009, we believe the impairments detailed in the table above are temporary and no impairment loss has been realized in our consolidated statements of income.

- 38 -

Table of Contents

At December 31, 2009 and 2008, investment securities with carrying values of $351.84 million and $434.12 million, respectively, were pledged as collateral to secure government deposits, security repurchase agreements, and for other purposes.

Note 4 — Loans and Lease Financings

Total loans and leases outstanding were recorded net of unearned income and deferred loan fees and costs at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and totaled $3.09 billion and $3.30 billion, respectively. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, net deferred loan and lease costs were $3.18 million and $4.58 million, respectively.

The loan and lease portfolio includes direct financing leases, which are included in auto, light truck and environmental equipment, medium and heavy duty truck, aircraft financing, and construction equipment financing on the consolidated balance sheet.

A summary of the gross investment in lease financing and the components of the investment in lease financing at December 31, 2009 and 2008, follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008
Direct finance leases:
Rentals receivable	$	207,666		$	183,818
Estimated residual value of leased assets		29,696			33,711
Gross investment in lease financing		237,362			217,529
Unearned income		(34,753	)		(31,630	)
Net investment in lease financing	$	202,609		$	185,899

At December 31, 2009, the minimum future lease payments receivable for each of the years 2010 through 2014 were $46.13 million, $37.49 million, $27.99 million, $21.13 million, and $16.72 million, respectively.

In the ordinary course of business, we have extended loans to certain directors, executive officers, and principal shareholders of equity securities of 1st Source and to their affiliates. In the opinion of management, these loans are made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other parties and are consistent with sound banking practices and within applicable regulatory and lending limitations. The aggregate dollar amounts of these loans were $9.58 million and $9.16 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. During 2009, $3.92 million of new loans and other additions were made and repayments and other reductions totaled $3.50 million.

Note 5 — Reserve for Loan and Lease Losses

Changes in the reserve for loan and lease losses for each of the three years ended December 31 are shown below.

(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2007
Balance, beginning of year	$	79,776		$	66,602		$	58,802
Provision for loan and lease losses		31,101			16,648			7,534
Charge-offs		(28,215	)		(8,393	)		(7,367	)
Recoveries		5,574			4,919			5,254
Reserves acquired in acquisitions		-			-			2,379
Balance, end of year	$	88,236		$	79,776		$	66,602

At December 31, 2009 and 2008, nonaccrual loans and leases, restructured loans and leases not in compliance with their modified terms and troubled debt restructured loans and leases, substantially all of which are collateralized, were $83.54 million and $36.55 million, respectively. Interest income for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, would have increased by approximately $5.17 million, $1.54 million, and $0.72 million, respectively, if these loans and leases had earned interest at their full contract rate.

As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, impaired loans and leases totaled $80.54 million and $30.94 million respectively, of which $39.67 million and $21.36 million had corresponding specific reserves for loan and lease losses totaling $8.92 million and $4.54 million, respectively. The remaining balances of impaired loans and leases had no specific reserves for loan and lease losses associated with them. As of December 31, 2009, a total of $74.18 million of the impaired loans and leases were nonaccrual loans and leases. For 2009, 2008, and 2007 the average recorded investment in impaired loans and leases was $65.87 million, $15.25 million and $8.35 million, respectively, and interest income recognized on impaired loans and leases totaled $1.93 million, $1.68 million, and $0.04 million, respectively.

Note 6 — Operating Leases

We finance various types of construction equipment, medium and heavy duty trucks, automobiles, and miscellaneous production equipment under leases principally classified as operating leases. The equipment underlying the operating leases is reported at cost, net of accumulated depreciation, in the Statements of Financial Condition. These operating lease arrangements require the lessee to make a fixed monthly rental payment over a specified lease term, typically from three to seven years. Rental income is earned on the operating lease assets and reported as noninterest income. These operating lease assets are depreciated over the term of the lease to the estimated fair value of the asset at the end of the lease. The depreciation of these operating lease assets is reported as a component of noninterest expense. At the end of the lease, the operating lease asset is either purchased by the lessee or returned to us.

Operating lease equipment at December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $97.00 million and $83.06 million, respectively, net of accumulated depreciation of $48.48 million and $39.65 million, respectively. Depreciable lives for operating lease equipment generally range from three to seven years.

- 39 -

Table of Contents

The minimum future lease rental payments due from clients on operating lease equipment at December 31, 2009, totaled $64.06 million, of which $25.47 million is due in 2010, $20.01 million in 2011, $12.96 million in 2012, $4.51 million in 2013, $1.06 million in 2014, and $0.05 million in 2015. Depreciation expense related to operating lease equipment for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $20.52 million.

Note 7 — Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment as of December 31 consisted of the following:

(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008
Land	$	11,052		$	10,788
Buildings and improvements		47,771			47,832
Furniture and equipment		36,261			35,861
Total premises and equipment		95,084			94,481
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(57,177	)		(53,990	)
Net premises and equipment	$	37,907		$	40,491

Depreciation and amortization of properties and equipment totaled $4.61 million in 2009, $5.31 million in 2008, and $5.36 million in 2007.

Note 8 — Mortgage Servicing Assets

The unpaid principal balance of residential mortgage loans serviced for third parties was $1.03 billion at December 31, 2009, compared to $0.78 billion at December 31, 2008, and $0.76 billion at December 31, 2007.

Changes in the carrying value of mortgage servicing assets and the associated valuation allowance follow:

(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008
Mortgage servicing assets:
Balance at beginning of year	$	6,708		$	7,440
Additions		7,143			5,488
Amortization		(3,331	)		(2,838	)
Sales		(1,771	)		(3,382	)
Carrying value before valuation allowance at end of year		8,749			6,708
Valuation allowance:
Balance at beginning of year		(2,073	)		(161	)
Impairment recoveries (charges)		2,072			(1,912	)
Balance at end of year	$	(1	)	$	(2,073	)
Net carrying value of mortgage servicing assets at end of year	$	8,748		$	4,635
Fair value of mortgage servicing assets at end of year	$	10,180		$	4,715

During 2009, management determined that it was not necessary to permanently write-down any previously established valuation allowance. At December 31, 2009, the fair value of mortgage servicing assets exceeded the carrying value reported in the consolidated balance sheet by $1.43 million. This difference represents increases in the fair value of certain mortgage servicing assets that could not be recorded above cost basis.

The key economic assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights as of December 31 follow:

	2009			2008
Expected weighted-average life (in years)		2.95			3.02
Weighted-average constant prepayment rate (CPR)		18.73	%		40.40	%
Weighted-average discount rate		8.96	%		8.45	%

Funds held in trust at 1st Source for the payment of principal, interest, taxes and insurance premiums applicable to mortgage loans being serviced for others, were approximately $16.78 million and $13.21 million at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Mortgage loan contractual servicing fees, including late fees and ancillary income, were $3.74 million, $3.05 million, and $2.85 million for 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. Mortgage loan contractual servicing fees are included in Mortgage banking income on the consolidated statement of income.

Note 9 — Intangible Assets and Goodwill

At December 31, 2009, intangible assets consisted of goodwill of $83.33 million and other intangible assets of $6.89 million, which is net of accumulated amortization of $3.78 million. At December 31, 2008, intangible assets consisted of goodwill of $83.33 million and other intangible assets of $8.36 million, which is net of accumulated amortization of $2.43 million. Intangible asset amortization was $1.35 million, $1.39 million, and $0.87 million for 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. Amortization on other intangible assets is expected to total $1.32 million, $1.29 million, $1.19 million, $1.02 million, and $0.83 million in 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014, respectively.

- 40 -

Table of Contents

A summary of core deposit intangible and other intangible assets as of December 31 follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008
Core deposit intangibles:
Gross carrying amount	$	10,421		$	10,537
Less: accumulated amortization		(3,699	)		(2,378	)
Net carrying amount	$	6,722		$	8,159
Other intangibles:
Gross carrying amount	$	254		$	254
Less: accumulated amortization		(82	)		(50	)
Net carrying amount	$	172		$	204

Note 10 — Deposits

The amount of certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more and other time deposits of $100,000 or more outstanding at December 31, 2009, by time remaining until maturity is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)
Under 3 months	$	103,958
4 – 6 months		70,820
7 – 12 months		169,341
Over 12 months		165,961
Total	$	510,080

Scheduled maturities of time deposits, including both private and public funds, at December 31, 2009 were as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)
2010	$	1,006,850
2011		289,050
2012		73,051
2013		51,888
2014		50,287
Thereafter		14,251
Total	$	1,485,377

Note 11 — Borrowed Funds and Mandatorily Redeemable Securities

Details of long-term debt and mandatorily redeemable securities as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	2009		2008
Term loan	$	10,000	$	10,000
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings (4.77%–6.54%)		955		10,981
Mandatorily redeemable securities		8,201		7,905
Other long-term debt		605		946
Total long-term debt and mandatorily redeemable securities	$	19,761	$	29,832

Annual maturities of long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2009, for the next five years beginning in 2010, are as follows (in thousands): $10,317; $216; $49; $51; and $54.

During 2007, we entered into a line of credit agreement whereby 1st Source may borrow up to $30.00 million. During 2008, $10.00 million was drawn on this line and converted to a term loan bearing a fixed interest rate of 4.28%. Interest is payable quarterly with principal due at the October 30, 2010 maturity. The Loan Agreement contains, among other provisions, certain covenants relating to capital structure financial requirements. $20.00 million remains available on the line of credit at December 31, 2009. The line of credit matures on October 30, 2010.

At December 31, 2009, the Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings represented a source of funding for certain residential mortgage activities and consisted of five fixed rate notes with maturities ranging from 2016 to 2022. These notes were collateralized by $1.19 million of certain real estate loans.

- 41 -

Table of Contents

Short-term borrowings include federal funds purchased, security repurchase agreements, commercial paper and other short-term borrowings. Federal funds purchased were $0.00 million and $105.50 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. Securities sold under agreement to repurchase were $123.79 million and $167.03 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. Commercial paper was $4.73 million and $4.46 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. Other short-term borrowings were $21.60 million and $19.19 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. Weighted average interest rates on short term borrowings as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 were 0.25% and 0.49% for federal funds purchased and security repurchase agreements, 0.43% and 0.29% for commercial paper and 1.80% and 2.92% for other short-term borrowings, respectively.

Mandatorily redeemable securities as of December 31, 2009, of $8.20 million reflected the "book value" shares under the 1st Source Executive Incentive Plan. See Note 16 - Employee Stock Benefit Plans for additional information. Dividends paid on these shares and changes in book value per share are recorded as other interest expense. Total interest expense recorded for 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $0.45 million, $0.66 million, and $0.80 million, respectively.

Note 12 — Subordinated Notes

As of December 31, 2009, we sponsored two trusts, 1st Source Capital Trust IV and 1st Source Master Trust (Capital Trusts) of which 100% of the common equity is owned by 1st Source. The Capital Trusts were formed for the purpose of issuing corporation-obligated mandatorily redeemable capital securities (the capital securities) to third-party investors and investing the proceeds from the sale of the capital securities solely in junior subordinated debenture securities of 1st Source (the subordinated notes). The subordinated notes held by each Capital Trust are the sole assets of that Capital Trust. The Capital Trusts are reported in the financial statements as unconsolidated subsidiaries. The junior subordinated debentures are reflected as subordinated notes in the Statements of Financial Condition.

Distributions on the capital securities issued by the Capital Trusts are payable quarterly at a rate per annum equal to the interest rate being earned by the Capital Trust on the subordinated notes held by that Capital Trust. The capital securities are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole or in part, upon repayment of the subordinated notes. We have entered into agreements which, taken collectively, fully and unconditionally guarantee the capital securities subject to the terms of each of the guarantees. The capital securities held by the Capital Trusts qualify as Tier 1 capital under Federal Reserve Board guidelines.

The subordinated notes are summarized as follows, at December 31, 2009:

	Amount of
	Subordinated		Interest			Maturity
(Dollars in thousands)	Notes		Rate			Date
September 2004 issuance-fixed rate	$	30,928		7.66	%	12/15/34
June 2007 issuance-fixed rate		41,238		7.22	%	06/15/37
August 2007 issuance-fixed rate		17,526		7.10	%	09/15/37
Total	$	89,692

Note 13 — Preferred Stock

On January 23, 2009, we entered into a Letter Agreement with the United States Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”), pursuant to which we issued and sold (i) 111,000 shares of our Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) and (ii) a warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase 837,947 shares of our common stock, without par value (the “Common Stock”), for an aggregate purchase price of $111,000,000 in cash.

The $111.00 million proceeds were allocated to the Series A Preferred Stock and the Warrant based on the relative fair value of the instruments. The fair value of the warrants was estimated using the binomial method. The expected volatility was based on the historical volatility for the ten year estimated life of the warrants. The following assumptions were used to value the warrants: a risk-free interest rate of 3.49%; an expected dividend yield of 3.21%; an expected volatility factor of 40.48%; and an expected warrant life of ten years. The fair value of the preferred stock was estimated using a discounted cash flow approach assuming a preferred stock life of five years and a 13.00% discount rate. The difference between the initial carrying value of $103.73 million that was allocated to the Series A Preferred Stock and its redemption value of $111.00 million will be charged to retained earnings (with a corresponding increase in the carrying value of the Series A Preferred Stock) over the first five years of the contract as an adjustment to the dividend yield using the effective yield method.

The Series A Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital and pays cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and 9% per annum thereafter. The Series A Preferred Stock is non-voting except with respect to certain matters affecting the rights of the holders thereof, and may be redeemed by us after notice to the Treasury and our primary federal regulator, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve Bank”) and subject to consultation between the Treasury and Federal Reserve Bank. At the time of redemption, if we do not choose to exercise our option to repurchase the warrants, the Secretary of Treasury intends to sell the warrants through an auction process.

The Warrant has a 10-year term and is immediately exercisable upon its issuance, with an exercise price, subject to anti-dilution adjustments, equal to $19.87 per share of the Common Stock.

In addition, we may not increase the quarterly dividend we pay on our common stock above $0.16 per share during the three-year period ending January 23, 2012, without consent of the Treasury, unless the Treasury no longer holds shares of the Series A Preferred Stock.

Note 14 — Earnings Per Share

Earnings per common share is computed using the two-class method. Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the applicable period, excluding outstanding participating securities. Participating securities include non-vested restricted stock awards. Non-vested restricted stock awards are considered participating securities to the extent the holders of these securities receive non-forfeitable dividends at the same rate as holders of common stock. Diluted earnings per common share is computed using the weighted-average number of shares determined for the basic earnings per common share computation plus the dilutive effect of stock compensation using the treasury stock method.

- 42 -

Table of Contents

The following table presents a reconciliation of the number of shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three years end December 31.

(Dollars in thousands - except per share amounts)	2009		2008		2007
Distributed earnings allocated to common stock	$	14,247	$	13,980	$	13,102
Undistributed earnings allocated to common stock		4,735		19,035		17,094
Net earnings allocated to common stock		18,982		33,015		30,196
Net earnings allocated to participating securities		92		371		343
Net income allocated to common stock and participating securities	$	19,074	$	33,386	$	30,539

Weighted average shares outstanding for basic earnings per common share		24,157,179		24,105,753		23,516,342
Dilutive effect of stock compensation		6,510		281,979		293,525
Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted earnings per common share		24,163,689		24,387,732		23,809,867

Basic earnings per common share	$	0.79	$	1.38	$	1.30
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.79	$	1.37	$	1.28

Note 15 — Employee Benefit Plans

The 1st Source Corporation Employee Stock Ownership and Profit Sharing Plan (as amended, the “Plan”) includes an employee stock ownership component, which is designed to invest in and hold 1st Source common stock, and a 401(k) plan component, which holds all Plan assets not invested in 1st Source common stock. The Plan also includes a number of features that encourage diversification of investments with more opportunities to change investment elections and contribution levels.

Employees are eligible to participate in the Plan the first of the month following 90 days of employment. We match dollar for dollar on the first 4% of deferred compensation, plus 50 cents on the dollar of the next 2% deferrals. We will also contribute to the Plan an amount designated as a fixed 2% employer contribution. The amount of fixed contribution is equal to two percent of compensation. Additionally, each year we may, in our sole discretion, make a discretionary profit sharing contribution. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, there were 1,262,509 and 1,191,749 shares, respectively, of 1st Source Corporation common stock held in relation to employee benefit plans.

Our contribution is allocated among the participants on the basis of compensation. Each participant’s account is credited with cash and/or shares of 1st Source common stock based on that participant’s compensation earned during the year. After completing five years of service in which they worked at least 1,000 hours per year, a participant will be completely vested in their employer’s contribution. An employee is always 100% vested in their deferral. Plan participants are entitled to receive distributions from their Plan accounts upon termination of service, which includes retirement or death.

Contribution expense for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, amounted to $2.83 million, $2.90 million, and $2.74 million, respectively.

The fixed 2% component of the Plan is based on 2% of participants’ eligible compensation. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, total pension expense for this plan amounted to $1.10 million, $1.37 million, and $1.06 million, respectively.

In addition to the 1st Source Corporation Employee Stock Ownership and Profit Sharing Plan, we provide certain health care and life insurance benefits for substantially all of our retired employees. Effective March 31, 2009, we amended the plan so that no new retirees will be covered by the plan. The amendment will have no effect on the coverage for retirees covered at the time of the amendment. Prior to amendment, all of our full-time employees became eligible for these retiree benefits upon reaching age 55 with 20 years of credited service. The medical plan pays a stated percentage of eligible medical expenses reduced for any deductibles and payments made by government programs and other group coverage. The lifetime maximum benefit payable under the medical plan is $15,000 and for life insurance is $3,000.

Our net periodic post retirement benefit (recovery) cost recognized in the consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 amounted to $(1.43) million, $0.13 million, and $(0.01) million, respectively. Our accrued postretirement benefit cost was not material at December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007.

Note 16 — Employee Stock Benefit Plans

As of December 31, 2009, we had five stock-based employee compensation plans. These plans include two stock option plans, namely, the 1992 Stock Option Plan, and the 2001 Stock Option Plan; two executive stock award plans, namely, the Executive Incentive Plan, and the Restricted Stock Award Plan; and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. These stock-based employee compensation plans were established to help retain and motivate key employees. All of the plans have been approved by the shareholders of 1st Source Corporation. The Executive Compensation and Human Resources Committee (the "Committee") of the 1st Source Corporation Board of Directors has sole authority to select the employees, establish the awards to be issued, and approve the terms and conditions of each award under the stock-based compensation plans.

- 43 -

Table of Contents

A combined summary of activity regarding our active stock option plans and stock award plans is presented in the following table.

				Non-Vested Stock					Stock Options
				Awards Outstanding					Outstanding
							Weighted-					Weighted-
	Shares			Number of			Average					Average
	Available			Shares			Grant-Date		Number of			Exercise
	for Grant						Fair Value		Shares			Price
Balance, January 1, 2007		2,407,659			410,148		$	13.90		489,475		$	26.04
Shares authorized --2007 EIP		97,250			-			-		-			-
Granted		(131,796	)		129,100			18.90		2,696			28.40
Stock options exercised		-			-			-		(20,654	)		15.63
Stock awards vested		-			(48,530	)		15.43		-			-
Forfeited		555			(20,516	)		12.33		-			-
Canceled		-			-			-		-			-
Balance, December 31, 2007		2,373,668			470,202			15.18		471,517			26.51
Shares authorized --2008 EIP		64,847			-			-		-			-
Granted		(66,847	)		66,847			17.96		-			-
Stock options exercised		-			-			-		-			-
Stock awards vested		-			(37,070	)		16.92		-			-
Forfeited		15,902			(64,508	)		15.10		(390,569	)		28.17
Canceled		-			-			-		-			-
Balance, December 31, 2008		2,387,570			435,471			15.47		80,948			18.51
Shares authorized --2009 EIP		46,261			-			-		-			-
Granted		(87,761	)		87,761			17.75		-			-
Stock options exercised		-			-			-		-			-
Stock awards vested		-			(34,395	)		16.99		-			-
Forfeited		2,047			(66,930	)		11.85		(9,185	)		21.03
Canceled		-			-			-		-			-
Balance, December 31, 2009		2,348,117			421,907		$	16.40		71,763		$	18.19

Stock Option Plans — Our incentive stock option plans include the 1992 Stock Option Plan (the "1992 Plan") and the 2001 Stock Option Plan (the "2001 Plan"). As of December 31, 2009, there were 7,508 stock options remaining exercisable under the 1992 Plan, all of which will expire no later than January 2011. We have not issued any awards from the 1992 Plan since 2001, as the 1992 Plan was terminated, except for outstanding options, after the 2001 Plan was approved by the shareholders. Options under the 2001 Plan vest in one to eight years from date of grant. As of December 31, 2009, there were 64,255 shares available for issuance upon exercise and 2,119,922 shares available for issuance under the 2001 Plan.

Each award from all plans is evidenced by an award agreement that specifies the option price, the duration of the option, the number of shares to which the option pertains, and such other provisions as the Committee determines. The option price is equal to the fair market value of a share of 1st Source Corporation's common stock on the date of grant. Options granted expire at such time as the Committee determines at the date of grant and in no event does the exercise period exceed a maximum of ten years. Upon merger, consolidation, or other corporate consolidation in which 1st Source Corporation is not the surviving corporation, as defined in the plans, all outstanding options immediately vest.

Proceeds from stock option exercises totaled $0.32 million in 2007. There were no stock option exercises during 2008 or 2009. All shares issued in connection with stock option exercises and non-vested stock awards are issued from available treasury stock.

The total intrinsic value of outstanding stock options and outstanding exercisable stock options was $0.09 million and $0.07 million at December 31, 2009. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $0.27 million in 2007. The total fair value of share awards vested was $0.72 million during 2009, $0.66 million in 2008, and $0.98 million in 2007.

Other information regarding stock options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2009, is as follows:

	Options Outstanding			Options Exercisable
		Weighted-Average
	Number of	Remaining Contractual	Weighted-Average	Number of	Weighted-Average
Range of Exercise Prices	Shares	Life (Years)	Exercise Price	Shares	Exercise Price
$12.04 to $17.99	29,508	2.73	$13.38	24,008	$13.69
$18.00 to $26.99	36,700	1.58	20.43	36,700	20.43
$27.00 to $29.46	5,555	1.81	28.95	5,555	28.95

As stated in Note 1 - Accounting Policies, effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions which require that stock-based compensation to employees be recognized as compensation cost in the income statement based on their fair values on the measurement date, which, for

- 44 -

Table of Contents

1st Source, is the date of grant. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized ratably over the requisite service period for all awards. We recognized additional stock-based compensation expense related to stock options of $12,362 for 2009, $15,364 for 2008 and $65,174 for 2007 (not subject to tax).

The fair value of each option on the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility estimated over a period equal to the expected life of the options. In estimating the fair value of stock options under the Black-Scholes valuation model, separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately. The expected life of the options granted is derived based on past experience and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The following weighted-average assumptions were used in the option pricing model for options granted in 2007 (no options were granted in 2008 or 2009): a risk-free interest rate of 4.10%; an expected dividend yield of 1.94%; an expected volatility factor of 30.46%; and an expected option life of 4.67 years. The weighted-average grant date per share fair value of options granted was $7.67 for 2007.

Stock Award Plans — Our incentive stock award plans include the Executive Incentive Plan (EIP) and the Restricted Stock Award Plan (RSAP). The EIP is also administered by the Committee. Awards under the EIP include "book value" shares and "market value" shares of common stock. These shares are awarded annually based on weighted performance criteria and generally vest over a period of five years. The EIP book value shares may only be sold to 1st Source and such sale is mandatory in the event of death, retirement, disability, or termination of employment. The RSAP is designed for key employees. Awards under the RSAP are made to employees recommended by the Chief Executive Officer and approved by the Committee. Shares granted under the RSAP vest over a two to ten year period and vesting is based upon meeting certain various criteria, including continued employment with 1st Source.

Stock-based compensation expense relating to the EIP and RSAP totaled $1.03 million in 2009, $0.32 million in 2008, and $0.16 million in 2007. The total income tax benefit recognized in the accompanying consolidated statements of income related to stock-based compensation was $0.85 million in 2009, $0.93 million in 2008, and $0.69 million in 2007. Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to stock options (2001 Plan) totaled $16,121 at December 31, 2009. At such date, the weighted-average period over which this unrecognized expense was expected to be recognized was 1.3 years. Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock awards (EIP/RSAP) was $2.71 million at December 31, 2009. At such date, the weighted-average period over which this unrecognized expense was expected to be recognized was 3.77 years.

The fair value of non-vested stock awards for the purposes of recognizing stock-based compensation expense is market price of the stock on the measurement date, which, for our purposes is the date of the award.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan — We offer an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) for substantially all employees with at least two years of service on the effective date of an offering under the plan. Eligible employees may elect to purchase any dollar amount of stock, so long as such amount does not exceed 25% of their base rate of pay and the aggregate stock accrual rate for all offerings does not exceed $25,000 in any calendar year. The purchase price for shares offered is the lower of the closing market bid price for the offering date or the average market bid price for the five business days preceding the offering date. The purchase price and discount to the actual market closing price on the offering date for the 2009, 2008, and 2007 offerings were $17.63 (0.05%), $20.70 (0.05%), and $25.58 (1.69%), respectively. Payment for the stock is made through payroll deductions over the offering period, and employees may discontinue the deductions at any time and exercise the option or take the funds out of the program. The most recent offering began June 1, 2009 and runs through May 31, 2011, with $216,390 in stock value to be purchased at $17.63 per share.

Note 17 — Income Taxes

Income tax expense was comprised of the following:

Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2007
Current:
Federal	$	(983	)	$	21,112		$	14,630
State		1,324			2,682			1,072
Total current		341			23,794			15,702
Deferred:
Federal		6,172			(9,446	)		(4,191	)
State		(485	)		(1,333	)		(367	)
Total deferred		5,687			(10,779	)		(4,558	)
Total provision	$	6,028		$	13,015		$	11,144

The reasons for the difference between income tax expense and the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate (35%) to income before income taxes are as follows:

	2009						2008						2007
				Percent of						Percent of						Percent of
				Pretax						Pretax						Pretax
Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in thousands)	Amount			Income			Amount			Income			Amount			Income
Statutory federal income tax	$	11,031			35.0	%	$	16,240			35.0	%	$	14,589			35.0	%
(Decrease) increase in income taxes resulting from:
Tax-exempt interest income		(2,539	)		(8.1	)		(2,412	)		(5.2	)		(2,380	)		(5.7	)
Settlements with taxing authorities		(2,170	)		(6.9	)		-			-			-			-
State taxes, net of federal income tax benefit		545			1.7			877			1.9			458			1.1
Dividends received deduction		(76	)		(0.2	)		(171	)		(0.4	)		(343	)		(0.8	)
Other		(763	)		(2.4	)		(1,519	)		(3.2	)		(1,180	)		(2.9	)
Total	$	6,028			19.1	%	$	13,015			28.1	%	$	11,144			26.7	%
The tax expense (benefit) applicable to securities gains for the years 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $639,000 , $(3,786,000), and $(1,185,000), respectively.

- 45 -

Table of Contents

Deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 consisted of the following:

(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008
Deferred tax assets:
Reserve for loan and lease losses	$	33,809		$	30,583
Accruals for employee benefits		2,785			3,323
Alternative minimum tax		1,678			-
Capital loss carryover		459			-
Securities valuation reserve		82			6,368
Other		1,770			521
Total deferred tax assets		40,583			40,795
Deferred tax liabilities:
Differing depreciable bases in premises and leased equipment		31,884			29,782
Differing bases in assets related to acquisitions		3,242			2,783
Net unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale		3,105			3,550
Mortgage servicing		3,018			1,206
Capitalized loan costs		1,306			1,879
Other		1,472			1,010
Total deferred tax liabilities		44,027			40,210
Net deferred tax (liability)/asset	$	(3,444	)	$	585

No valuation allowance for deferred tax assets was recorded at December 31, 2009 and 2008 as we believe it is more likely than not that all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. As of December 31, 2009, we have $1.7 million of Alternative Minimum Tax Credits which have an indefinite life. We expect to fully utilize the amounts carried forward.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2007
Balance, beginning of year	$	7,601		$	7,063		$	5,795
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year		409			1,271			1,268
Additions for tax positions of prior years		771			693			-
Reductions for tax positions of prior years		(52	)		(136	)		-
Reductions due to lapse in statute of limitations		(837	)		(1,290	)		-
Settlements		(4,849	)		-			-
Balance, end of year	$	3,043		$	7,601		$	7,063

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would affect the effective tax rate if recognized was $1.30 million at December 31, 2009, $4.19 million at December 31, 2008 and $4.25 million at December 31, 2007. Interest and penalties are recognized through the income tax provision. For the years 2009, 2008 and 2007, we recognized approximately $(0.73) million, $0.14 million and $0.26 million in interest, net of tax effect, and penalties, respectively. Interest and penalties of approximately $0.55 million, $1.27 million and $1.13 million were accrued at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Tax years that remain open and subject to audit include the federal 2006–2009 years and the Indiana 2006–2009 years. During the first quarter 2009, we reached a resolution of audit examinations for the 2002-2007 years and as a result recorded a reduction of unrecognized tax benefits in the amount of $4.85 million that affected the effective tax rate and increased earnings in the amount of $2.60 million. We do not anticipate a significant change in the amount of uncertain tax positions within the next 12 months.

Note 18 — Contingent Liabilities, Commitments, and Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk

Contingent Liabilities —1st Source and our subsidiaries are defendants in various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, based upon present information including the advice of legal counsel, the ultimate resolution of these proceedings will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Commitments — 1st Source and our subsidiaries are obligated under operating leases for certain office premises and equipment. In 1982, we sold the headquarters building and entered into a leaseback agreement with the purchaser. At December 31, 2009, the remaining term of the lease was three years with options to renew for up to 15 additional years. Approximately 35% of the facility is subleased to other tenants.

Future minimum rental commitments for all noncancellable operating leases total approximately, $2.60 million in 2010, $2.28 million in 2011, $1.22 million in 2012, $0.58 million in 2013, $0.47 million in 2014, and $1.14 million, thereafter. As of December 31, 2009, future minimum rentals to be received under noncancellable subleases totaled $2.82 million.

- 46 -

Table of Contents

Rental expense of office premises and equipment and related sublease income were as follows:

Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2007
Gross rental expense	$	3,016		$	3,116		$	3,255
Sublease rental income		(1,516	)		(1,523	)		(1,640	)
Net rental expense	$	1,500		$	1,593		$	1,615

Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk —To meet the financing needs of our clients, 1st Source and our subsidiaries are parties to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business. These off-balance-sheet financial instruments include commitments to originate, purchase and sell loans, and standby letters of credit. The instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for loan commitments and standby letters of credit is represented by the dollar amount of those instruments. We use the same credit policies and collateral requirements in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for on-balance-sheet instruments.

Loan commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Bank grants mortgage loan commitments to borrowers, subject to normal loan underwriting standards. The interest rate risk associated with these loan commitments is managed by entering into contracts for future deliveries of loans.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a client to a third party. The credit risk involved in and collateral obtained when issuing standby letters of credit are essentially the same as those involved in extending loan commitments to clients. Standby letters of credit totaled $19.02 million and $82.18 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Standby letters of credit generally have terms ranging from six months to one year.

Note 19 — Derivative Financial Instruments

Commitments to originate or purchase residential mortgage loans held for sale and forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans are considered derivative instruments. See Note 18 for further information.

We have certain interest rate derivative positions that are not designated as hedging instruments. These derivative positions relate to transactions in which we enter into an interest rate swap with a client while at the same time entering into an offsetting interest rate swap with another financial institution. In connection with each transaction, we agree to pay interest to the client on a notional amount at a variable interest rate and receive interest from the client on the same notional amount at a fixed interest rate. At the same time, we agree to pay another financial institution the same fixed interest rate on the same notional amount and receive the same variable interest rate on the same notional amount. The transaction allows our client to effectively convert a variable rate loan to a fixed rate. Because the terms of the swaps with our customers and the other financial institution offset each other, with the only difference being counterparty credit risk, changes in the fair value of the underlying derivative contracts are not materially different and do not significantly impact our results of operations.

At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the amounts of non-hedging derivative financial instruments are shown in the chart below:

(Dollars in thousands)			Asset derivatives			Liability derivatives
	Notional or		Statement of			Statement of
	contractual		Financial Condition	Fair		Financial Condition	Fair
	amount		location	value		location	value

Interest rate swap contracts	$	412,717	Other assets	$	13,516	Other liabilities	$	13,988
Loan commitments		48,821	Mortgages held for sale		77	N/A		-
Forward contracts		38,940	Mortgages held for sale		411	N/A		-
Total - December 31, 2009				$	14,004		$	13,988

Interest rate swap contracts	$	421,283	Other assets	$	22,663	Other liabilities	$	23,003
Loan commitments		93,317	Mortgages held for sale		1,582	N/A		-
Forward contracts		97,555	N/A		-	Mortgages held for sale		1,385
Total - December 31, 2008				$	24,245		$	24,388

- 47 -

Table of Contents

At December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the amounts included in the consolidated statements of income for non-hedging derivative financial instruments are shown in the chart below:


	Statement of	Gain (loss)
(Dollars in thousands)	Income location	2009			2008			2007

Interest rate swap contracts	Other expense	$	(431	)	$	(271	)	$	(69	)
Loan commitments	Mortgage banking income		(1,505	)		1,595			193
Forward contracts	Mortgage banking income		1,796			(1,131	)		(513	)
Total		$	(140	)	$	193		$	(389	)

Note 20 — Regulatory Matters

We are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a material effect on our financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, we must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of our assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Our capital amounts and classification are subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require us to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total capital and Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets and of Tier I capital to average assets. We believe that we meet all capital adequacy requirements to which we are subject.

The most recent notification from the Federal bank regulators categorized 1st Source Bank, the largest of our subsidiaries, as "well capitalized" under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as "well capitalized" we must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table below. There are no conditions or events since that notification that we believe will have changed the institution’s category.

As discussed in Note 12, the capital securities held by the Capital Trusts qualify as Tier 1 capital under Federal Reserve Board guidelines. As discussed in Note 13, preferred stock issued under the TARP program qualifies as Tier 1 capital as well.

The actual and required capital amounts and ratios for 1st Source Corporation and 1st Source Bank as of December 31, 2009, are presented in the table below:

											To Be Well
											Capitalized Under
						Minimum Capital					Prompt Corrective
	Actual					Adequacy					Action Provisions
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):
1st Source Corporation	$	605,793		17.72	%	$	273,568		8.00	%	$	341,961		10.00	%
1st Source Bank		571,328		16.78	%		272,404		8.00	%		340,505		10.00	%
Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):
1st Source Corporation		561,862		16.43	%		136,784		4.00	%		205,176		6.00	%
1st Source Bank		528,184		15.51	%		136,202		4.00	%		204,303		6.00	%
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets):
1st Source Corporation		561,862		12.74	%		176,346		4.00	%		220,433		5.00	%
1st Source Bank		528,184		12.03	%		175,577		4.00	%		219,471		5.00	%

The Bank is required to maintain noninterest bearing cash balances with the Federal Reserve Bank. The average balance of these deposits for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, was approximately $3.00 million and $3.33 million, respectively.

Dividends that may be paid by a subsidiary bank to the parent company are subject to certain legal and regulatory limitations and also may be affected by capital needs, as well as other factors. Without regulatory approval, the Bank can pay dividends in 2010 of up to $27.97 million, plus an additional amount equal to its net profits for 2010, as defined by statute, up to the date of any such dividend declaration.

Due to our mortgage activities, 1st Source Bank is required to maintain minimum net worth capital requirements established by various governmental agencies. 1st Source Bank's net worth requirements are governed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development and GNMA. As of December 31, 2009, 1st Source Bank met its minimum net worth capital requirements.

- 48 -

Table of Contents

Note 21 — Fair Values of Financial Instruments

We elected fair value accounting for new mortgages held for sale originations starting on January 1, 2008. We believe the election for mortgages held for sale (which are hedged with free-standing derivatives (economic hedges)) will reduce certain timing differences and better match changes in the value of these assets with changes in the value of derivatives used as economic hedges for these assets. There was no transition adjustment required for mortgages held for sale because we continued to account for mortgages held for sale originated prior to January 1, 2008 at the lower of cost or fair value. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, all mortgages held for sale are carried at fair value.

The following table reflects the differences between fair value carrying amount of mortgages held for sale measured at fair value and the aggregate unpaid principal amount we are contractually entitled to receive at maturity on December 31, 2009 and 2008:

(Dollars in thousands)	Fair value carrying amount		Aggregate unpaid principal		Excess of fair value carrying amount over (under) unpaid principal
December 31, 2009
Mortgages held for sale reported at fair value:
Total Loans	$	26,649	$	25,758	$	891	(1	)
Nonaccrual Loans		-		-		-
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing		-		-		-
December 31, 2008
Mortgages held for sale reported at fair value:
Total Loans	$	46,686	$	45,141	$	1,545	(1	)
Nonaccrual Loans		-		-		-
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing		-		-		-

(1) The excess of fair value carrying amount over unpaid principal is included in mortgage banking income and includes changes in fair value at and subsequent to funding, gains and losses on the related loan commitment prior to funding, and premiums on acquired loans.

We also deferred until January 1, 2009 the application of Fair Value Measurements to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities not recognized or disclosed at least annually at fair value. Items affected by this deferral included goodwill, repossessions and other real estate, all for which any necessary impairment analyses are performed using fair value measurements.

We determine the fair values of our financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of quoted price and observable inputs and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

Investment securities available for sale are valued primarily by a third party pricing agent and both the market and income valuation approaches are implemented using the following types of inputs:

·	U.S. treasuries are priced using the market approach and utilizing live data feeds from active market exchanges for identical securities.

·	Government-sponsored agency debt securities and corporate bonds are primarily priced using available market information through processes such as benchmark curves, market valuations of like securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing.

·	Other government-sponsored agency securities, mortgage-backed securities and some of the actively traded REMICs and CMOs, are primarily priced using available market information including benchmark yields, prepayment speeds, spreads and volatility of similar securities.

·	Other inactive government-sponsored agency securities are primarily priced using consensus pricing and dealer quotes.

State and political subdivisions are largely grouped by characteristics, i.e., geographical data and source of revenue in trade dissemination systems. Since some securities are not traded daily and due to other grouping limitations, active market quotes are often obtained using benchmarking for like securities. Local tax anticipation warrants, with very little market activity, are priced using an appropriate market yield curve.

·	Marketable equity (common) securities are primarily priced using the market approach and utilizing live data feeds from active market exchanges for identical securities.

·	Marketable equity (preferred) securities are primarily priced using available market information through processes such as benchmark curves, benchmarking of like securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing.

Trading account securities are priced using the market approach and utilizing live data feeds from active market exchanges for identical securities.

Mortgages held for sale and the related loan commitments and forward contracts (hedges) are valued using a market value approach and utilizing an appropriate current market yield and a loan commitment closing rate based on historical analysis.

- 49 -

Table of Contents

Interest rate swap positions, both assets and liabilities, are valued by a third-party pricing agent using an income approach and utilizing models that use as their basis readily observable market parameters. This valuation process considers various factors including interest rate yield curves, time value and volatility factors.

The table below presents the balance of assets and liabilities at December 31, 2009 and 2008, measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

(Dollars in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Investment securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury and Federal agencies securities	$	20,052	$	369,117	$	-	$	389,169
U.S. States and political subdivisions securities		-		173,509		18,310		191,819
Mortgage-backed securities - Federal agencies		-		290,977		-		290,977
Corporate debt securities		-		26,322		-		26,322
Foreign government securities		-		-		675		675
Total debt securities		20,052		859,925		18,985		898,962
Marketable equity securities		2,667		-		9		2,676
Total investment securities available for sale		22,719		859,925		18,994		901,638
Trading account securities		125		-		-		125
Mortgages held for sale		-		26,649		-		26,649
Accrued income and other liabilities (interest rate swap agreements)		-		13,516		-		13,516
Total - December 31, 2009	$	22,844	$	900,090	$	18,994	$	941,928

Liabilities:
Accrued expenses and other liabilities (interest rate swap agreements)	$	-	$	13,988	$	-	$	13,988
Total - December 31, 2009	$	-	$	13,988	$	-	$	13,988

Assets:
Investment securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury and Federal agencies securities	$	81,621	$	214,730	$	-	$	296,351
U.S. States and political subdivisions securities		-		181,977		18,972		200,949
Mortgage-backed securities - Federal agencies		-		210,008		-		210,008
Corporate debt securities		-		10,544		-		10,544
Foreign government securities		-		-		435		435
Total debt securities		81,621		617,259		19,407		718,287
Marketable equity securities		3,249		3,209		9		6,467
Total investment securities available for sale		84,870		620,468		19,416		724,754
Trading account securities		100		-		-		100
Mortgages held for sale		-		46,686		-		46,686
Accrued income and other liabilities (interest rate swap agreements)		-		22,663		-		22,663
Total - December 31, 2008	$	84,970	$	689,817	$	19,416	$	794,203

Liabilities:
Accrued expenses and other liabilities (interest rate swap agreements)	$	-	$	23,003	$	-	$	23,003
Total - December 31, 2008	$	-	$	23,003	$	-	$	23,003

- 50 -

Table of Contents

The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities at December 31, 2009 and 2008, measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	U.S. States and political subdivisions securities			Foreign government securities			Marketable equity securities			Other investments			Investment securities available-for-sale
Beginning balance January 1, 2009	$	18,972		$	435		$	9		$	-		$	19,416
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings		-			-			-			-			-
Included in other comprehensive income		362			-			-			-			362
Purchases and issuances		20,116			400			-			-			20,516
Settlements		-			-			-			-			-
Expirations		(21,140	)		(160	)		-			-			(21,300	)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		-			-			-			-			-
Ending balance December 31, 2009	$	18,310		$	675		$	9		$	-		$	18,994

Beginning balance January 1, 2008	$	37,342		$	665		$	2,562		$	1,643		$	42,212
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings		(42	)		-			789			-			747
Included in other comprehensive income		(589	)		-			(773	)		-			(1,362	)
Purchases and issuances		24,714			-			-			-			24,714
Settlements		-			-			-			-			-
Expirations		(47,199	)		(230	)		(2,569	)		-			(49,998	)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		4,746			-			-			(1,643	)		3,103
Ending balance December 31, 2008	$	18,972		$	435		$	9		$	-		$	19,416

There were no gains or losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets and liabilities still held at December 31, 2009.

We may be required, from time to time, to measure certain other financial assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These other financial assets include loans measured for impairment, venture capital partnership investments, mortgage servicing rights, goodwill, repossessions and other real estate.

Impaired loans and related write-downs are based on the fair value of the underlying collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Collateral values are estimated using customized discounting criteria, appraisals and dealer and trade magazine quotes which are used in a market valuation approach. Repossessions are similarly valued.

Venture capital partnership investments and the adjustments to fair value primarily result from application of lower-of-cost-or-fair value accounting. The partnership investments are priced using financial statements provided by the partnerships.

Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) and related adjustments to fair value result from application of lower-of-cost-or-fair value accounting. For purposes of impairment, MSRs are stratified based on the predominant risk characteristics of the underlying servicing, principally by loan type and interest rate. The fair value of each tranche of the servicing portfolio is estimated by calculating the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows, taking into consideration actual and expected mortgage loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs, and other economic factors. A fair value analysis is also obtained from an independent third party agent. MSRs do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices and though sales of MSRs do occur, precise terms and conditions typically are not readily available and the characteristics of our servicing portfolio may differ from those of any servicing portfolios that do trade.

Goodwill is reviewed for impairment at least annually, or on an interim basis if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the carrying amount. Goodwill is allocated into two reporting units. Fair value for each reporting unit is estimated using stock price multiples or revenue multiples. We do not believe there is a reasonable possibility that either of our reporting units are at risk of failing a future Step 1 impairment test.

Other real estate is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral less expected selling costs. Collateral values are estimated primarily using appraisals and reflect a market value approach.

For assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis the following represents impairment charges (recoveries) recognized on these assets during the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively: impaired loans - $16.06 million and $2.54 million; venture capital partnership investments - $(0.45) million and $0.13 million; mortgage servicing rights - $(2.07) million and $1.91 million; goodwill - $0.00 million and $0.00 million; repossessions - $0.30 million and $0.22 million, and other real estate - $0.16 million and $0.07 million.

- 51 -

Table of Contents

For assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at December 31, 2009 and 2008, the following table provides the level of valuation assumptions used to determine each valuation and the carrying value of the related assets.

(Dollars in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
December 31, 2009
Loans	$	-	$	-	$	80,537	$	80,537
Accrued income and other assets (venture capital partnership investments)		-		-		2,662		2,662
Accrued income and other assets (mortgage servicing rights)		-		-		8,748		8,748
Goodwill and intangible assets (goodwill)		-		83,329		-		83,329
Accrued income and other assets (repossessions)		-		-		10,165		10,165
Accrued income and other assets (other real estate)		-		-		6,529		6,529
Total	$	-	$	83,329	$	108,641	$	191,970
December 31, 2008
Loans	$	-	$	-	$	30,941	$	30,941
Accrued income and other assets (venture capital partnership investments)		-		-		2,253		2,253
Accrued income and other assets (mortgage servicing rights)		-		-		4,715		4,715
Total	$	-	$	-	$	37,909	$	37,909

The fair values of our financial instruments as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 are summarized in the table below.

	2009				2008
	Carrying or				Carrying or
(Dollars in thousands)	Contract Value		Fair Value		Contract Value		Fair Value
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	72,872	$	72,872	$	119,771	$	119,771
Federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits with other banks		141,166		141,166		6,951		6,951
Investment securities, available-for-sale		901,638		901,638		724,754		724,754
Other investments and trading account securities		21,137		21,137		18,712		18,712
Mortgages held for sale		26,649		26,649		46,686		46,686
Loans and leases, net of reserve for loan and lease losses		3,004,914		3,042,251		3,218,436		3,239,567
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies		51,342		51,342		38,837		38,837
Mortgage servicing rights		8,748		10,180		4,635		4,715
Interest rate swaps		13,516		13,516		22,663		22,663
Liabilities:
Deposits	$	3,652,464	$	3,692,203	$	3,514,542	$	3,486,609
Short-term borrowings		150,110		150,110		296,175		296,175
Long-term debt and mandatorily redeemable securities		19,761		19,831		29,832		29,674
Subordinated notes		89,692		81,118		89,692		73,972
Interest rate swaps		13,988		13,988		23,003		23,003
Off-balance-sheet instruments *		-		150		-		297
* Represents estimated cash outflows required to currently settle the obligations at current market rates.

GAAP requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis. The methodologies for estimating fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis are discussed above. The estimated fair value approximates carrying value for cash and cash equivalents and cash surrender value of life insurance policies. The methodologies for other financial assets and financial liabilities are discussed below:

Loans and Leases — For variable rate loans and leases that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair values of loans and leases are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses which use interest rates currently being offered for loans and leases with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality (except as noted in the following sentence). The fair values for certain real estate loans (e.g., one-to-four family residential mortgage loans) are based on quoted market prices of similar loans sold in conjunction with securitization transactions, adjusted for differences in loan characteristics.

- 52 -

Table of Contents

Deposits — The fair values for all deposits other than time deposits are equal to the amounts payable on demand (the carrying value). Fair values of variable rate time deposits are equal to their carrying values. Fair values for fixed rate time deposits are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses using interest rates currently being offered for deposits with similar remaining maturities.

Short-Term Borrowings — The carrying values of Federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements, and other short-term borrowings, including our liability related to mortgage loans available for repurchase under GNMA optional repurchase programs, approximate their fair values.

Long-Term Debt and Mandatorily Redeemable Securities — The fair values of long-term debt are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on our current estimated incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The carrying values of mandatorily redeemable securities are based on approximate fair values.

Subordinated Notes — Fair values are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are estimated based on calculated market prices of comparable securities.

Off-Balance-Sheet Instruments — Contract and fair values for certain of our off-balance-sheet financial instruments (guarantees) are estimated based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing.

Limitations — Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information and information about the financial instruments. Because no market exists for a significant portion of our financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other such factors.

These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time our entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. These estimates are subjective in nature and require considerable judgment to interpret market data. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts we could realize in a current market exchange, nor are they intended to represent the fair value of 1st Source as a whole. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of the respective balance sheet date. Although management is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the estimated fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued since the presentation dates, and therefore, estimates of fair value after the balance sheet date may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.

Other significant assets, such as premises and equipment, other assets, and liabilities not defined as financial instruments, are not included in the above disclosures. Also, the fair value estimates for deposits do not include the benefit that results from the low-cost funding provided by the deposit liabilities compared to the cost of borrowing funds in the market.

Note 22 — 1st Source Corporation (Parent Company Only) Financial Information

STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

December 31 (Dollars in thousands)	2009		2008
ASSETS
Cash	$	1	$	2
Short-term investments with bank subsidiary		45,695		15,368
Investment securities, available-for-sale
(amortized cost of $6,175 and $4,742 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively)		7,581		6,811
Trading account securities		125		100
Investments in:
Bank subsidiaries		621,265		534,586
Non-bank subsidiaries		2,396		3,091
Premises and equipment, net		2,240		2,264
Other assets		7,124		6,803
Total assets	$	686,427	$	569,025
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Commercial paper borrowings	$	5,113	$	5,344
Other liabilities		2,518		1,739
Long-term debt and mandatorily redeemable securities		108,476		108,278
Total liabilities		116,107		115,361
Shareholders’ equity		570,320		453,664
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	686,427	$	569,025

- 53 -

Table of Contents

STATEMENTS OF INCOME

Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2007
Income:
Dividends from bank and non-bank subsidiaries	$	23,104		$	17,468		$	58,051
Rental income from subsidiaries		2,391			2,412			2,442
Other		507			994			2,077
Investment securities and other investment (losses) gains		(426	)		(1,053	)		3
Total income		25,576			19,821			62,573
Expenses:
Interest on long-term debt and mandatorily redeemable securities		7,477			7,773			7,294
Interest on commercial paper and other short-term borrowings		16			209			639
Rent expense		1,090			1,060			1,057
Other		1,339			1,850			1,572
Total expenses		9,922			10,892			10,562
Income before income tax benefit and equity in undistributed (distributed in excess of) income of subsidiaries		15,654			8,929			52,011
Income tax benefit		2,899			3,308			2,380
Income before equity in undistributed (distributed in excess of) income of subsidiaries		18,553			12,237			54,391
Equity in undistributed (distributed in excess of) income of subsidiaries:
Bank subsidiaries		6,996			21,235			(23,028	)
Non-bank subsidiaries		(59	)		(86	)		(824	)
Net income	$	25,490		$	33,386		$	30,539

- 54 -

Table of Contents

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW

Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2007
Operating activities:
Net income	$	25,490		$	33,386		$	30,539
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Equity (undistributed) distributed in excess of income of subsidiaries		(6,937	)		(21,149	)		23,852
Depreciation of premises and equipment		428			377			316
Realized and unrealized investment securities losses (gains)		426			1,053			(3	)
Change in trading account securities		(25	)		(100	)		-
Other		919			2,732			(629	)
Net change in operating activities		20,301			16,299			54,075
Investing activities:
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investment securities		46,294			2,879			18,752
Purchases of investment securities		(48,513	)		-			(10,499	)
Net change in premises and equipment		(404	)		(405	)		(410	)
Change in short-term investments with bank subsidiary		(30,327	)		(4,148	)		3,222
Change in loans made to subsidiaries, net		-			-			3,030
Capital contributions to subsidiaries		(80,000	)		-			-
Return of capital from subsidiaries		636			5,950			5,106
Cash paid for acquisition, net		-			-			(78,348	)
Net change in investing activities		(112,314	)		4,276			(59,147	)
Financing activities:
Net change in commercial paper		(231	)		(6,131	)		3
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated notes		-			-			58,764
Payments on subordinated notes		-			(10,310	)		(17,784	)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		153			10,000			-
Payments on long-term debt		(252	)		(252	)		(10,259	)
Net proceeds from issuance of treasury stock		1,663			341			545
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock and common stock warrants		111,000			-			-
Acquisition of treasury stock		(1,299	)		-			(12,821	)
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock		(4,502	)
Cash dividends paid on common stock		(14,520	)		(14,253	)		(13,345	)
Net change in financing activities		92,012			(20,605	)		5,103
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(1	)		(30	)		31
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		2			32			1
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	1		$	2		$	32

Note 23 — Subsequent Events

We have evaluated subsequent events through the date our financial statements were issued, or February 19, 2010. We do not believe any subsequent events have occurred that would require further disclosure or adjustment to our financial statements.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

1st Source carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, at December 31, 2009, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by 1st Source in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in those reports is accumulated and communicated to management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In addition, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) during the fourth fiscal quarter of 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

- 55 -

Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management of 1st Source Corporation ("1st Source") is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. 1st Source’s internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures pertaining to 1st Source’s ability to record, process, and report reliable information. Actions are taken to correct any deficiencies as they are identified through internal and external audits, regular examinations by bank regulatory agencies, 1st Source’s formal risk management process, and other means. 1st Source’s internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to 1st Source’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of 1st Source’s published financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control may vary over time.

1st Source’s management assessed the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Based on management’s assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2009, 1st Source’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of 1st Source’s internal control over financial reporting. This report appears on page 27.

By /s/ CHRISTOPHER J. MURPHY III

Christopher J. Murphy III, Chief Executive Officer

By /s/ LARRY E. LENTYCH

Larry E. Lentych, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

South Bend, Indiana

Item 9B. Other Information.

None

Part III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The information under the caption "Proposal Number 1: Election of Directors," "Board Committees and Other Corporate Governance Matters," and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" of the 2010 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The information under the caption "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" of the 2010 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The information under the caption "Voting Securities and Principal Holders Thereof" and "Proposal Number 1: Election of Directors" of the 2010 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Equity Compensation Plan Information:

				Number of Securities
				Remaining Available
				for Future Issuance
	Number of Securities to be	Weighted-average		Under Equity
	Issued upon Exercise of	Exercise Price of		Compensation Plans
	Outstanding Options,	Outstanding Options,		[excluding securities
	Warrants and Rights	Warrants and Rights		reflected in column (a)]
Equity compensation plans
approved by shareholders
1992 stock option plan	7,508		$17.31		-
2001 stock option plan	64,255		18.29		2,119,922
1997 employee stock purchase plan	27,639		19.34		150,160
1982 executive incentive plan	-		-		96,230	(1	)(2)
1982 restricted stock award plan	-		-		131,965	(1	)
Total plans approved by shareholders	99,402		$18.51		2,498,277
Equity compensation plans
not approved by shareholders	-		-		-
Total equity compensation plans	99,402		$18.51		2,498,277
(1)Amount is to be awarded by grants administered by the Executive Compensation Committee of the 1st Source Board of Directors.
(2)Amount includes market value stock only. Book value shares used for annual awards may only be sold to 1st Source

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The information under the caption "Proposal Number 1: Election of Directors" of the 2010 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

The information under the caption "Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" of the 2010 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

- 56 -

Table of Contents

Part IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) Financial Statements and Schedules:

The following Financial Statements and Supplementary Data are filed as part of this annual report:

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated statements of financial condition — December 31, 2009 and 2008

Consolidated statements of income — Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007

Consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity — Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007

Consolidated statements of cash flows — Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007

Notes to consolidated financial statements — December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007

Financial statement schedules required by Article 9 of Regulation S-X are not required under the related instructions, or are inapplicable and, therefore, have been omitted.

(b) Exhibits (numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K):

3(a)	Articles of Incorporation of Registrant, as amended April 30, 1996, and filed as exhibit to Form 10-K, dated December 31, 1996, and incorporated herein by reference.
3(b)	By-Laws of Registrant, as amended July 30, 2009, filed as exhibit to Form 8-K, dated July 30, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
3(c)	Certificate of Designations for Series A Preferred Stock, dated January 23, 2009, filed as exhibit to Form 8-K, dated January 23, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
4(a)	Form of Common Stock Certificates of Registrant filed as exhibit to Registration Statement 2-40481 and incorporated herein by reference.
4(b)	1st Source agrees to furnish to the Commission, upon request, a copy of each instrument defining the rights of holders of Senior and Subordinated debt of 1st Source.
4(c)	Form of Certificate for Series A Preferred Stock, dated January 23, 2009, filed as exhibit to Form 8-K, dated January 23, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
4(d)	Warrant for Purchase of Shares of Common Stock, dated January 23, 2009, filed as exhibit to Form 8-K, dated January 23, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
10(a)(1)	Employment Agreement of Christopher J. Murphy III, dated January 1, 2008, filed as exhibit to Form 8-K, dated March 17, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
10(a)(2)	Employment Agreement of Wellington D. Jones III, dated January 1, 2008, filed as exhibit to Form 8-K, dated March 17, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
10(a)(4)	Employment Agreement of Larry E. Lentych, dated January 1, 2008, filed as exhibit to Form 8-K, dated March 17, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
10(a)(6)	Employment Agreement of John B. Griffith, dated January 1, 2008, filed as exhibit to Form 8-K, dated March 17, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
10(b)	1st Source Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan dated April 17, 1997, filed as exhibit to Form 10-K, dated December 31, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference.
10(c)	1st Source Corporation 1982 Executive Incentive Plan, amended January 17, 2003, and filed as exhibit to Form 10-K, dated December 31, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference.
10(d)	1st Source Corporation 1982 Restricted Stock Award Plan, amended January 17, 2003, and filed as exhibit to Form 10-K, dated December 31, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference.
10(e)	1st Source Corporation 2001 Stock Option Plan, amended July 27, 2006, and filed as an exhibit to 1st Source Corporation Proxy Statement dated March 7, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
10(g)(1)	1st Source Corporation 1992 Stock Option Plan, amended July 27, 2006, and dated April 23, 1992, as amended December 11, 1997, filed as exhibit to Form 10-K, dated December 31, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference.
10(g)(2)	An amendment to 1st Source Corporation 1992 Stock Option Plan, dated July 18, 2000, and filed as exhibit to Form 10-K, dated December 31, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference.
10(h)	1st Source Corporation 1998 Performance Compensation Plan, dated February 19, 1998, filed as exhibit to Form 10-K, dated December 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference.
10(j)	Contract with Fiserv Solutions, Inc. dated November 23, 2005, filed as exhibit to Form 10-K, dated, December 31, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.
10(k)	Letter Agreement dated January 23, 2009 by and between 1st Source Corporation and the United States Department of the Treasury, including the Securites Purchase Agreement – Standard Terms, filed as exhibit to Form 8-K, dated January 23, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
10(l)	Form of CPP Compensation Limitation Agreement, dated January 23, 2009, filed as exhibit to Form 8-K, dated January 23, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.

- 57 -

Table of Contents

21	Subsidiaries of Registrant (unless otherwise indicated, each subsidiary does business under its own name):
	Name	Jurisdiction
	1st Source Bank	Indiana
	SFG Aircraft, Inc. * (formerly known as SFG Equipment Leasing, Inc.)	Indiana
	1st Source Insurance, Inc. *	Indiana
	1st Source Specialty Finance, Inc. *	Indiana
	FBT Capital Corporation (Inactive)	Indiana
	1st Source Leasing, Inc.	Indiana
	1st Source Capital Corporation *	Indiana
	Trustcorp Mortgage Company (Inactive)	Indiana
	1st Source Capital Trust IV	Delaware
	1st Source Master Trust	Delaware
	Michigan Transportation Finance Corporation *	Michigan
	1st Source Intermediate Holding, LLC	Delaware
	1st Source Funding, LLC	Delaware
	1st Source Corporation Investment Advisors, Inc. *	Indiana
	SFG Commercial Aircraft Leasing, Inc. *	Indiana
	SFG Equipment Leasing Corporation I*	Indiana
	Washington and Michigan Insurance, Inc.*	Arizona
	*Wholly-owned subsidiaries of 1st Source Bank
23	Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
31.1	Certification of Christopher J. Murphy III, Chief Executive Officer (Rule 13a-14(a)).
31.2	Certification of Larry E. Lentych, Chief Financial Officer (Rule 13a-14(a)).
32.1	Certification of Christopher J. Murphy III, Chief Executive Officer.
32.2	Certification of Larry E. Lentych, Chief Financial Officer.
99.1	First fiscal year certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 111(b) of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
99.2	First fiscal year certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 111(b) of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

1st SOURCE CORPORATION

By /s/ CHRISTOPHER J. MURPHY III

Christopher J. Murphy III, Chairman of the Board,

President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 19, 2010

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date

/s/ CHRISTOPHER J. MURPHY III	Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer	February 19, 2010
Christopher J. Murphy III

/s/ WELLINGTON D. JONES III	Executive Vice President and Director	February 19, 2010
Wellington D. Jones III

/s/ LARRY E. LENTYCH	Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principle Accounting Officer	February 19, 2010
Larry E. Lentych

/s/ JOHN B. GRIFFITH	Secretary and General Counsel	February 19, 2010
John B. Griffith

/s/ DANIEL B. FITZPATRICK	Director	February 19, 2010
Daniel B. Fitzpatrick

/s/ TERRY L. GERBER	Director	February 19, 2010
Terry L. Gerber

/s/ LAWRENCE E. HILER	Director	February 19, 2010
Lawrence E. Hiler

/s/ WILLIAM P. JOHNSON	Director	February 19, 2010
William P. Johnson

- 58 -

Table of Contents


/s/ CRAIG A. KAPSON	Director	February 19, 2010
Craig A. Kapson


/s/ REX MARTIN	Director	February 19, 2010
Rex Martin

/s/ DANE A. MILLER	Director	February 19, 2010
Dane A. Miller

/s/ TIMOTHY K. OZARK	Director	February 19, 2010
Timothy K. Ozark

/s/ JOHN T. PHAIR	Director	February 19, 2010
John T. Phair

/s/ MARK D. SCHWABERO	Director	February 19, 2010
Mark D. Schwabero

- 59 -

Attached files

Stock widget

Investing forum

1ST SOURCE CORP Reports

Also read