Attached files
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
[X] Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the
quarterly period ended January 2, 2010
or
[ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Commission File Number 033-75706-01
BERRY PLASTICS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
35-1814673
|
(State
or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
(IRS
employer
identification
number)
|
SEE
TABLE OF ADDITIONAL REGISTRANT GUARANTORS
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: (812) 424-2904
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrants: (1) have filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No
[ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
[ ] No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrants are large accelerated filers, accelerated
filers, or non-accelerated filers. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large
accelerated filer
[ ] Accelerated
filer [ ] Non-accelerated
filer [ X ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934). Yes [ ] No [X]
As of
February 16, 2010, all of the outstanding 100 shares of the Common Stock, $.01
par value, of Berry Plastics Corporation were held by Berry Plastics Group,
Inc.
Table
of Additional Registrant Guarantors
Exact
Name
|
Jurisdiction
of Organization
|
Primary
Standard Industrial Classification Code Number
|
I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.
|
Name,
Address and Telephone Number of Principal Executive
Offices
|
Aerocon,
LLC
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
1948748
|
(a)
|
Berry
Iowa, LLC
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
1382173
|
(a)
|
Berry
Plastics Design, LLC
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
1689708
|
(a)
|
Berry
Plastics Technical Services, Inc.
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
1029638
|
(a)
|
Berry
Sterling Corporation
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
1749681
|
(a)
|
CPI
Holding Corporation
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
1820303
|
(a)
|
Knight
Plastics, Inc.
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
2056610
|
(a)
|
Packerware
Corporation
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
0759852
|
(a)
|
Pescor,
Inc.
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
3002028
|
(a)
|
Poly-Seal,
LLC
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
0892112
|
(a)
|
Venture
Packaging, Inc.
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
0368479
|
(a)
|
Venture
Packaging Midwest, Inc.
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
1809003
|
(a)
|
Berry
Plastics Acquisition Corporation III
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
1445502
|
(a)
|
Berry
Plastics Opco, Inc.
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
0120989
|
(a)
|
Berry
Plastics Acquisition Corporation V
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
4509933
|
(a)
|
Berry
Plastics Acquisition Corporation VIII
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
0036809
|
(a)
|
Berry
Plastics Acquisition Corporation IX
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
2184302
|
(a)
|
Berry
Plastics Acquisition Corporation X
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
2184301
|
(a)
|
Berry
Plastics Acquisition Corporation XI
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
2184300
|
(a)
|
Berry
Plastics Acquisition Corporation XII
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
2184299
|
(a)
|
Berry
Plastics Acquisition Corporation XIII
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
2184298
|
(a)
|
Berry
Plastics Acquisition Corporation XV, LLC
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
2184293
|
(a)
|
Kerr
Group, LLC
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
0898810
|
(a)
|
Saffron
Acquisition, LLC
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
3293114
|
(a)
|
Setco,
LLC
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
2374074
|
(a)
|
Sun
Coast Industries, LLC
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
1952968
|
(a)
|
Cardinal
Packaging, Inc.
|
Ohio
|
3089
|
1396561
|
(a)
|
Covalence
Specialty Adhesives LLC
|
Delaware
|
2672
|
4104683
|
(a)
|
Covalence
Specialty Coatings LLC
|
Delaware
|
2672
|
4104683
|
(a)
|
Caplas
LLC
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
3888603
|
(a)
|
Caplas
Neptune, LLC
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
5557864
|
(a)
|
Captive
Holdings, Inc.
|
Delaware
|
3089
|
1290475
|
(a)
|
Captive
Plastics, Inc.
|
New
Jersey
|
3089
|
1890735
|
(a)
|
Grafco
Industries Limited Partnership
|
Maryland
|
3089
|
1729327
|
(a)
|
Rollpak
Acquisition Corporation
|
Indiana
|
3089
|
0512845
|
(a)
|
Rollpak
Corporation
|
Indiana
|
3089
|
1582626
|
(a)
|
Pliant
Corporation
|
Delaware
|
2673
|
2107725
|
(a)
|
Pliant
Corporation International
|
Utah
|
2673
|
0473075
|
(a)
|
Pliant
Film Products of Mexico, Inc.
|
Utah
|
2673
|
0500805
|
(a)
|
Pliant
Packaging of Canada, LLC
|
Utah
|
2673
|
0580929
|
(a)
|
Uniplast
Holdings Inc.
|
Delaware
|
2673
|
3999589
|
(a)
|
Uniplast
U.S., Inc.
|
Delaware
|
2673
|
3199066
|
(a)
|
Superfos
Packaging Inc.
|
Virginia
|
3089
|
1444795
|
(a)
|
(a) 101
Oakley Street, Evansville, IN 47710
-2-
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form
10-Q includes "forward-looking statements," within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the "Exchange Act"), with respect to our financial condition, results
of operations and business and our expectations or beliefs concerning future
events. The forward-looking statements include, in particular,
statements about our plans, strategies and prospects under the heading
"Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations". You can identify certain forward-looking statements by
our use of forward-looking terminology such as, but not limited to, "believes,"
"estimates," "intends," "plans," "likely," "will," "would," "could" and similar
expressions that identify forward-looking statements. All
forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Many
risks and uncertainties are inherent in our industry and markets. Others are
more specific to our operations. The occurrence of the events
described and the achievement of the expected results depend on many events,
some or all of which are not predictable or within our
control. Actual results may differ materially from the
forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q. Factors that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied
by the forward-looking statements include:
·
|
risks
associated with our substantial indebtedness and debt
service;
|
·
|
changes
in prices and availability of resin and other raw materials and our
ability to pass on changes in raw material prices on a timely
basis;
|
·
|
performance
of our business and future operating
results;
|
·
|
risks
related to our acquisition strategy and integration of acquired
businesses;
|
·
|
reliance
on unpatented know-how and trade
secrets;
|
·
|
increases
in the cost of compliance with laws and regulations, including
environmental laws and regulations;
|
·
|
risks
related to disruptions in the overall economy and the financial markets
may adversely impact our business;
|
·
|
catastrophic
loss of one of our key manufacturing
facilities;
|
·
|
risks
of competition, including foreign competition, in our existing and future
markets;
|
·
|
general
business and economic conditions, particularly an economic downturn;
and
|
·
|
the
other factors discussed in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 26, 2009 in the section titled “Risk
Factors.”
|
Readers
should carefully review the factors discussed in our Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended September 26, 2009 in the section titled “Risk Factors” and other
risk factors identified from time to time in our periodic filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and should not place undue reliance on our
forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update any
forward-looking statements to reflect changes in underlying assumptions or
factors, new information, future events or other changes.
-3-
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
We make
available, free of charge, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments, if any, to those reports
through our Internet website as soon as practicable after they have been
electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Our internet address is
www.berryplastics.com. The information contained on our website is
not being incorporated herein.
-4-
Berry
Plastics Corporation
Form
10-Q Index
For
Quarterly Period Ended January 2, 2010
-5-
Part 1. Financial Information
Item
1. Financial Statements
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(In
Millions of Dollars)
January
2, 2010
|
September
26, 2009
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 22.0 | $ | 10.0 | ||||
Accounts receivable (less
allowance for doubtful accounts of $12.1 at January 2, 2010 and $9.0 at
September 26, 2009)
|
412.7 | 333.2 | ||||||
Inventories, net:
|
||||||||
Finished goods
|
284.7 | 219.6 | ||||||
Raw materials and work in
process
|
199.0 | 154.4 | ||||||
483.7 | 374.0 | |||||||
Deferred income
taxes
|
52.5 | 44.0 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other
current assets
|
39.9 | 30.4 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
1,010.8 | 791.6 | ||||||
Property
and equipment:
|
||||||||
Land
|
50.5 | 38.9 | ||||||
Buildings and
improvements
|
222.3 | 173.2 | ||||||
Equipment and construction in
progress
|
1,379.5 | 1,126.2 | ||||||
1,652.3 | 1,338.3 | |||||||
Less accumulated
depreciation
|
502.6 | 462.7 | ||||||
1,149.7 | 875.6 | |||||||
Goodwill
|
1,705.1 | 1,431.2 | ||||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
1,163.1 | 1,062.5 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
282.6 | 240.1 | ||||||
3,150.8 | 2,733.8 | |||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 5,311.3 | $ | 4,401.0 |
-6-
Berry
Plastics Corporation
Consolidated
Balance Sheets (continued)
(In
Millions of Dollars)
January
2,
2010
|
September
26,
2009
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Liabilities
and stockholders' equity
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts payable
|
$ | 298.5 | $ | 229.8 | ||||
Accrued expenses and other
current liabilities
|
275.1 | 192.9 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term
debt
|
22.6 | 17.5 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
596.2 | 440.2 | ||||||
Long-term
debt, less current portion
|
4,040.3 | 3,342.2 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
252.6 | 194.9 | ||||||
Other
long-term liabilities
|
124.9 | 102.0 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
5,014.0 | 4,079.3 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
||||||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
||||||||
Parent company investment,
net
|
629.5 | 629.2 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(308.4 | ) | (279.2 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss
|
(23.8 | ) | (28.3 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
297.3 | 321.7 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 5,311.3 | $ | 4,401.0 |
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
-7-
Berry
Plastics Corporation
(Unaudited)
(In
Millions of Dollars)
Quarterly
Period Ended
|
||||||||
January
2, 2010
|
December
27, 2008
|
|||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 879.6 | $ | 865.0 | ||||
Cost
of goods sold
|
746.6 | 738.1 | ||||||
Gross
profit
|
133.0 | 126.9 | ||||||
Operating
expenses:
|
||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative
|
87.9 | 89.5 | ||||||
Restructuring and impairment
charges, net
|
6.6 | 0.6 | ||||||
Acquisition costs
|
19.2 | — | ||||||
Other operating
expenses
|
7.3 | 5.2 | ||||||
Operating
income
|
12.0 | 31.6 | ||||||
Other
expense (income)
|
(4.4 | ) | 6.6 | |||||
Interest
expense
|
70.5 | 70.7 | ||||||
Interest
income
|
(16.4 | ) | (0.5 | ) | ||||
Net
loss before income taxes
|
(37.7 | ) | (45.2 | ) | ||||
Income
tax benefit
|
(8.5 | ) | (15.8 | ) | ||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (29.2 | ) | $ | (29.4 | ) |
See notes to consolidated financial
statements.
-8-
Consolidated
Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
For
the Quarterly Period Ended January 2, 2010 and December 27, 2008
(Unaudited)
(In
Millions of Dollars)
Parent
Company Investment
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive
Loss
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
Total
|
Comprehensive
Loss
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
at September 27, 2008
|
$ | 617.2 | $ | (12.3 | ) | $ | (253.0 | ) | $ | 351.9 | ||||||||||
Stock
compensation expense
|
11.6 | — | — | 11.6 | ||||||||||||||||
Net
transfers to parent
|
(0.5 | ) | — | — | (0.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
— | — | (29.4 | ) | (29.4 | ) | $ | (29.4 | ) | |||||||||||
Currency
translation
|
— | (27.0 | ) | — | (27.0 | ) | (27.0 | ) | ||||||||||||
Derivative
valuation
|
— | (4.7 | ) | — | (4.7 | ) | (4.7 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balance
at December 27, 2008
|
$ | 628.3 | $ | (44.0 | ) | $ | (282.4 | ) | $ | 301.9 | $ | (61.1 | ) |
Parent
Company Investment
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive
Loss
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
Total
|
Comprehensive
Loss
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
at September 26, 2009
|
$ | 629.2 | $ | (28.3 | ) | $ | (279.2 | ) | $ | 321.7 | ||||||||||
Stock
compensation expense
|
0.3 | — | — | 0.3 | ||||||||||||||||
Derivative
amortization
|
— | 1.3 | — | 1.3 | ||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
— | — | (29.2 | ) | (29.2 | ) | $ | (29.2 | ) | |||||||||||
Currency
translation
|
— | 3.2 | — | 3.2 | 3.2 | |||||||||||||||
Balance
at January 2, 2010
|
$ | 629.5 | $ | (23.8 | ) | $ | (308.4 | ) | $ | 297.3 | $ | (26.0 | ) |
See notes to consolidated financial
statements.
-9-
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(In
Millions of Dollars)
Quarterly
Period Ended
|
||||||||
|
January
2, 2010
|
December
27, 2008
|
||||||
Operating
activities
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (29.2 | ) | $ | (29.4 | ) | ||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization
|
70.8 | 61.7 | ||||||
Non-cash interest
expense
|
5.8 | 5.2 | ||||||
Non-cash interest
income
|
(16.4 | ) | — | |||||
Non-cash
compensation
|
0.3 | 11.6 | ||||||
Other non-cash expense
(income)
|
(4.3 | ) | 6.6 | |||||
Deferred income tax
benefit
|
(9.8 | ) | (15.8 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts receivable,
net
|
35.3 | 67.9 | ||||||
Inventories
|
(12.7 | ) | 67.0 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other
assets
|
11.3 | 0.5 | ||||||
Accounts payable and other
liabilities
|
15.1 | (63.7 | ) | |||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
66.2 | 111.6 | ||||||
Investing
activities
|
||||||||
Additions
to property and equipment
|
(61.6 | ) | (43.2 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from disposal of assets
|
0.3 | 0.1 | ||||||
Investment
in Berry Plastics Group debt securities
|
(2.0 | ) | — | |||||
Acquisition
of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
(643.7 | ) | (4.3 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used for investing activities
|
(707.0 | ) | (47.4 | ) | ||||
Financing
activities
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from long-term borrowings
|
685.5 | — | ||||||
Repayments
on long-term borrowings
|
(7.8 | ) | (81.6 | ) | ||||
Debt
financing costs
|
(24.7 | ) | (0.3 | ) | ||||
Transfers
to parent, net
|
— | (0.5 | ) | |||||
Net
cash (used for) provided by financing activities
|
653.0 | (82.4 | ) | |||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
(0.2 | ) | (0.9 | ) | ||||
Net
increase in cash
|
12.0 | (19.1 | ) | |||||
Cash
at beginning of period
|
10.0 | 189.7 | ||||||
Cash
at end of period
|
$ | 22.0 | $ | 170.6 |
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
-10-
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In
millions of dollars, except as otherwise noted)
1.
|
Background
and Nature of Operations
|
Berry
Plastics Corporation (“Berry” or the “Company”) manufactures and markets plastic
packaging products, plastic film products, specialty adhesives and coated
products. At January 2, 2010 the Company had over 80 production and
manufacturing facilities, primarily located in the United
States. Berry is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Berry Plastics Group,
Inc. (“Berry Group”). Berry Group is primarily owned by affiliates of
Apollo Management, L.P. and Graham Partners. Berry, through its
wholly owned subsidiaries operates five reporting segments: Rigid
Open Top, Rigid Closed Top, Flexible Films, Tapes/Coatings and Specialty
Films. The Company’s customers are located principally throughout the
United States, without significant concentration in any one region or with any
one customer.
2.
|
Basis
of Presentation
|
The
accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of Berry have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the instructions
for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Act of
1934. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been
included. Operating results for the periods presented are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal
year. The accompanying financial statements include the results of
the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. For further
information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes
thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended September 26, 2009. All
intercompany transactions have been eliminated. The Company issued
financial statements by filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 16, 2010. The Company has evaluated subsequent events up to the time of
the filing.
Related
Party Transactions and Allocations
The
Company’s operating results for the quarterly periods ended January 2, 2010 and
December 27, 2008 represent the Consolidated Results of Operations of the
Company. The balance sheets as of January 2, 2010 and September 26,
2009 represent the Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Company as of the
respective dates. The Company has recorded expense in their financial
statements of $0.3 million and $11.6 million for the quarterly periods ended as
of January 2, 2010 and December 27, 2008, respectively, related to stock
compensation of Berry Group. The Company has recorded management fees
of $1.5 million and $1.4 million for the quarterly periods ended January 2, 2010
and December 27, 2008, respectively, charged by Apollo and other investors to
Berry Group and recorded income taxes to push down the respective amounts that
relate to the consolidated operations of the Company. Parent Company
Investment includes the equity from Berry Group that was invested in Berry by
Apollo and other shareholders. As part of the acquisition of Pliant
Corporation (“Pliant”) the Company paid to Apollo and Graham
$5.5
-11-
million
of transaction costs which has been recorded in Acquisition costs in our
consolidated statement of operations. In addition, as part of the
Pliant transaction, Apollo and Graham received a combined cash liquidation
settlement of approximately $22.0 million for their pre-bankruptcy investment
position in Pliant which was paid by the Company as part of the purchase price
of Pliant.
BP
Parallel LLC, a non-guarantor subsidiary of the Company invested $2.0 million
during the quarterly period ended January 2, 2010 to purchase assignments
totaling $3.7 million of Berry Group’s senior unsecured term loan (“Senior
Unsecured Term Loan”). The Senior Unsecured Term Loan matures on June
5, 2014. Interest on the loan is payable on a quarterly basis and
bears interest at Berry Group’s option based on (1) a fluctuating rate per annum
equal to the higher of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 1/2 of 1% and (b) the
rate of interest in effect for such day as publicly announced from time to time
by Credit Suisse as its “prime rate” plus 525 basis points or (2) LIBOR (0.25%
at January 2, 2010) plus 625 basis points. The Senior Unsecured Term
Loan contains a payment in kind (“PIK”) option which allows Berry Group to forgo
paying cash interest and to add the PIK interest to the outstanding balance of
the loan. This expires on the five year anniversary of the loan and
if elected increases the rate per annum by 75 basis points for the specific
interest period. Berry Group at its election may make the quarterly
interest payments in cash, may make the payments by paying 50% of the interest
in cash and 50% in PIK interest or 100% in PIK interest for the first five
years. The notes are unsecured
and there are no guarantees by Berry Plastics Corporation.
The
Company is accounting for its investments in the Senior Unsecured Term Loan as a
held-to-maturity investment in accordance with the investment accounting
standards of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). The
Company has the intent and ability to hold the security to
maturity. The investment is stated at amortized cost and the discount
is being accreted under the effective interest method to interest income until
the maturity of the debt. The Company has recorded their investment
in Other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and is recording the interest
income and the income from the discount on the purchase of Senior Unsecured Term
Loan in Interest income in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. As of January 2, 2010, BP Parallel LLC has invested
$167.9 million to purchase assignments of $518.3 million principal of the Senior
Unsecured Term Loan resulting in the Company recognizing $16.2 million of
interest and accretion income for the quarterly period
ended January 2, 2010. The outstanding balance of the Senior
Unsecured Term Loan was $77.6 million at January 2, 2010.
3. Acquisition
and Divestiture
Pliant
Corporation
On
December 3, 2009, the Company obtained control of 100% of the capital stock of
Pliant upon Pliant’s emergence from reorganization pursuant to a proceeding
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code for a purchase price of $602.7 million
($576.5 million, net of cash acquired). Pliant is a leading
manufacturer of value-added films and flexible packaging for food, personal
care, medical, agricultural and industrial applications. The acquired
business was operated as Berry’s newly formed Specialty Films reporting
segment. To finance the purchase, the Company used proceeds from
private placement offerings, consisting of $370.0 million aggregate principal
amount of 81/4% first priority
senior secured fixed rate notes (“First Priority Fixed Rate Notes”) due on
November 15, 2015 and $250.0 million additional principal amount of 87/8% second
-12-
priority
senior secured fixed rate notes (“Second Priority Fixed Rate Notes”) due on
September 15, 2014, as more fully described in footnote 6.
The
acquisition was accounted for as a business combination using the purchase
method of accounting. The Company has not yet
completed the purchase price allocation and is subject to change. The
Company is still finalizing their allocation of the purchase price to
intangible assets, the step-up to fair value on fixed assets, deferred income
taxes and reviewing all of the working capital acquired. The Company
has recognized goodwill on this transaction as a result of expected
synergies. Goodwill will not be deductible for tax
purposes. The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation
of purchase price and the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition:
Working
capital
|
$ | 145.8 | ||
Property
plant & equipment
|
238.2 | |||
Intangible
assets
|
124.8 | |||
Goodwill
|
215.0 | |||
Long-term
liabilities
|
(121.1 | ) | ||
Net
assets acquired
|
$ | 602.7 |
From the
date of acquisition the Company has recorded $70.9 million of net sales and
$25.1 million net loss in the consolidated statement of operations attributed to
the acquired business. The net loss is primarily attributed to $18.3
million of transaction costs which is recorded in Acquisition costs and $4.7
million of restructuring charges primarily related to severance costs in
Restructuring and impairment charges, net.
Pro forma
net sales were $1,041.4 million and $1,111.6 million for the quarterly periods
ended January 2, 2010 and December 27, 2008, respectively. Pro forma
net loss was $61.4 million and $199.6 million for the quarterly periods ended
January 2, 2010 and December 27, 2008, respectively. The pro forma
net sales and net loss assume that the Pliant acquisition had occurred as of the
beginning of the respective periods.
The
proforma information presented above is for informational purposes only and is
not necessarily indicative of the operating results that would have occurred had
the Pliant Acquisition been consummated at the beginning of the respective
period, nor is it necessarily indicative of future operating
results. Further, the information reflects only pro forma adjustments
for additional interest expense, amortization and closing expenses, net of the
applicable income tax effects.
Superfos
Packaging, Inc.
In
December 2009, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock of
Superfos Packaging, Inc., a manufacturer of injection molded plastic rigid open
top containers and other plastic packaging products primarily for food,
industrial and personal care end markets. Net sales for 2009 were
$41.0 million. The newly added business will be operated in Berry’s
Rigid Open Top reporting segment. The purchase price was
approximately $82.0 million ($79.9 million, net of cash
acquired) and was funded from cash on hand and the revolving line of
credit. Pro forma results have not been presented, as they do not
differ materially from reported historical results.
-13-
4. Restructuring
The table
below sets forth the Company’s estimate of the total cost of the 2007, 2008 and
2009 restructuring programs, the cumulative portion recognized through January
2, 2010 and the portion expected to be recognized in a future
period:
Expected
Total Costs
|
Recognized
through January 2, 2010
|
To
be Recognized in Future
|
||||||||||
Severance
and termination benefits
|
$ | 12.5 | $ | 12.5 | $ | — | ||||||
Facility
exit costs
|
24.5 | 24.5 | — | |||||||||
Asset
impairment
|
25.9 | 25.9 | — | |||||||||
Other
|
7.0 | 3.6 | 3.4 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 69.9 | $ | 66.5 | $ | 3.4 |
The
Company incurred restructuring costs related to severance, asset impairment and
facility exit costs of $6.6 million and $0.6 million for the quarterly periods
ended as of January 2, 2010 and December 27, 2008, respectively.
The table
below sets forth the activity with respect to the restructuring accrual at
September 26, 2009 and January 2, 2010:
Employee
Severance
and
Benefits
|
Facilities
Exit
Costs
|
Non-cash
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Balance
at fiscal year end 2008
|
$ | ― | $ | 4.1 | $ | ― | $ | 4.1 | ||||||||
Charges
|
0.6 | 2.9 | 7.8 | 8.8 | ||||||||||||
Non-cash
asset impairment
|
― | ― | (7.8 | ) | (7.8 | ) | ||||||||||
Cash
payments
|
(0.6 | ) | (4.2 | ) | ― | (1.7 | ) | |||||||||
Balance
at September 26, 2009
|
― | 2.8 | ― | 2.8 | ||||||||||||
Charges
|
4.1 | 2.5 | ― | 6.6 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition
liability assumed
|
0.8 | ― | ― | 0.8 | ||||||||||||
Cash
payments
|
(0.1 | ) | (2.7 | ) | ― | (2.8 | ) | |||||||||
Balance
at January 2, 2010
|
$ | 4.8 | $ | 2.6 | $ | ― | $ | 7.4 |
-14-
5. Accrued
Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
The
following table sets forth the totals included in Accrued expenses and other
current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
January
2, 2010
|
September
26, 2009
|
|||||||
Employee
compensation, payroll and other taxes
|
$ | 74.1 | $ | 80.1 | ||||
Interest
|
47.6 | 17.7 | ||||||
Restructuring
|
7.4 | 2.8 | ||||||
Rebates
|
56.1 | 43.9 | ||||||
Acquisition
related
|
17.5 | ― | ||||||
Other
|
72.4 | 48.4 | ||||||
$ | 275.1 | $ | 192.9 |
6. Long-Term
Debt
Long-term
debt consists of the following:
Maturity
Date
|
January
2,
2010
|
September
26, 2009
|
|||||||
Term
loan
|
April
3, 2015
|
$ | 1,167.0 | $ | 1,173.0 | ||||
Revolving
line of credit
|
April
3, 2013
|
156.0 | 69.0 | ||||||
First
Priority Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes
|
February
15, 2015
|
680.6 | 680.6 | ||||||
First
Priority Senior Secured Fixed Rate Notes
|
November
15, 2015
|
370.0 | ― | ||||||
Second
Priority Senior Secured Fixed Rate Notes
|
September
15, 2014
|
775.0 | 525.0 | ||||||
Second
Priority Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes
|
September
15, 2014
|
225.0 | 225.0 | ||||||
11%
Senior Subordinated Notes
|
September
15, 2016
|
454.6 | 454.6 | ||||||
10
¼% Senior Subordinated Notes
|
March
1, 2016
|
215.3 | 215.3 | ||||||
Debt
discount
|
(37.7 | ) | (15.1 | ) | |||||
Capital
leases and other
|
Various
|
57.1 | 32.3 | ||||||
4,062.9 | 3,359.7 | ||||||||
Less
current portion of long-term debt
|
(22.6 | ) | (17.5 | ) | |||||
$ | 4,040.3 | $ | 3,342.2 |
The
current portion of long-term debt consists of $12.0 million of principal
payments on the term loan and $10.6 million of principal payments related to
capital lease obligations. The Company was in compliance with its
covenants as of January 2, 2010.
In December 2009, the
Company increased the amount of lender commitments under the revolving credit
facility by $100 million which expands the capacity on our revolving credit
facility to $481.7 million, net of defaulting lenders. At
January 2, 2010, there was $156.0 million outstanding on the revolving line of
credit and $33.7 million in letters of credit outstanding. At January
2, 2010, the Company had unused borrowing capacity of $292.0 million (net of
defaulting
-15-
lenders)
under the revolving line of credit subject to the solvency of the Company’s
lenders to fund their obligations and the Company’s borrowing base
calculations.
In
November 2009, the Company completed private placement offerings, consisting of
$370.0 million aggregate principal amount of First Priority Fixed Rate Notes due
on November 15, 2015 and $250.0 million additional principal amount of Second
Priority Fixed Rate Notes due on September 15, 2014. The Company
received gross proceeds, before expenses and accrued interest, of $365.7 million
and $230.6 million from the First Priority Fixed Rate Notes and Second Priority
Fixed Rate Notes, respectively. The proceeds were placed into escrow
pending the fulfillment of certain conditions related to the Pliant
acquisition. On December 3, 2009 substantially simultaneously with
the Pliant acquisition, the Company assumed the obligations under the existing
notes and the proceeds of the existing notes were released from
escrow.
First
Priority Fixed Rate Notes
The Company’s $370.0
million in aggregate principal amount of 8 ¼% first priority senior secured
fixed rate notes mature in 2015. No principal payments are required
with respect to the First Priority Fixed Rate Notes prior to
maturity. Interest on the notes is due semi-annually on May 15 and
November 15. The First Priority Fixed Rate Notes are
guaranteed on a senior secured basis by all of the Company’s existing and future
guarantor subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions and will include all of
the Company’s subsidiaries that guarantee the Company’s obligations under its
term loan facility. The First Priority Fixed Rate Notes and the
guarantees are secured on a first-priority basis by a lien on the assets that
secure the Company’s obligations under its senior secured credit facilities,
subject to certain exceptions. The Company was in
compliance with all covenants at January 2, 2010.
Second
Priority Fixed Rate Notes
The
Company’s $250.0 million of additional principal amount of 87/8% second priority
senior secured fixed rate notes mature in 2014. No principal payments
are required with respect to the Second Priority Fixed Rate Notes prior to
maturity. Interest on the notes is due semi-annually on May 15 and
November 15. The Second Priority Fixed
Rate Notes are guaranteed on a second priority secured basis in substantially
all of the Company’s existing and future guarantor subsidiaries that secure its
obligations under its senior secured credit facilities, subject to certain
exceptions, and will rank equally in right of payment to all existing and future
senior indebtedness. The Company was in compliance with all
covenants at January 2, 2010.
7.
Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements
As part
of the overall risk management, the Company uses derivative instruments to
reduce exposure to changes in interest rates attributed to the Company’s
floating-rate borrowings. For those derivative instruments that are
designated and qualify as hedging instruments, the Company must designate the
hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as a fair value hedge,
cash flow hedge, or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign
operation. To the extent hedging relationships are found to be
effective, as determined by FASB guidance, changes in fair value of the
derivatives are offset by changes in the fair value of the related hedged item
are recorded to Accumulated other comprehensive loss. Management believes hedge
effectiveness is evaluated properly in preparation of the financial
statements.
-16-
Cash Flow Hedging
Strategy
For
derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the
effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported
as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss and reclassified into
earnings in the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction and in
the same line item associated with the transaction and in the same period or
periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The
Company’s forward derivative agreements related to resin contracts are currently
immaterial.
In August
2007, the Company entered into two separate interest rate swap transactions to
protect $600.0 million of the outstanding variable rate term loan debt from
future interest rate volatility. The swap agreements became effective
in November 2007. The first agreement had a notional amount of $300.0
million and became effective November 5, 2007 and swaps three month variable
LIBOR contracts for a fixed two year rate of 4.875% and expired on November 5,
2009. The second agreement had a notional amount of $300.0 million
and became effective November 5, 2007 and swaps three month variable LIBOR
contracts for a fixed three year rate of 4.920% and expires on November 5,
2010. The counterparty to these agreements is a global financial
institution.
The
Company’s term loan gives the option to elect different interest rate reset
options. On November 5, 2008, the Company began to utilize 1-month
LIBOR contracts for the underlying senior secured credit
facility. The Company’s change in interest rate selection caused the
Company to lose hedge accounting on both of the interest rate swaps entered into
in August 2007. The Company records changes in fair value from
November 5, 2008 in the statement of operations and is amortizing the previously
recorded unrealized loss in Accumulated other comprehensive loss to Interest
expense through the end of the respective swap agreement.
Liability
Derivatives
|
|||||||||
Derivatives
not designated as hedging instruments under FASB guidance
|
Balance
Sheet Location
|
January
2, 2010
|
September
26, 2009
|
||||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
Other
LT liabilities
|
$ | ― | $ | 13.5 | ||||
Accrued
exp and other current liabilities
|
10.8 | 1.4 | |||||||
$ | 10.8 | $ | 14.9 |
The
effect of the derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Operations
for the quarterly period ended January 2, 2010, are as follows:
Quarterly
Period Ended
|
|||||||||
Statement
of Operations Location
|
January
2, 2010
|
December
27, 2008
|
|||||||
Derivatives
not designated as hedging instruments under FASB guidance
|
|||||||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
Other
(income) expense
|
$ | (4.1 | ) | $ | 3.7 | |||
Interest
expense
|
$ | 2.3 | $ | 2.3 |
-17-
Effective
September 28, 2008, the Company adopted the fair value disclosure of financial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair
value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis. The
Financial Instruments section of the Accounting Standards Codification
(“Codification” or “ASC”) permits an entity to measure certain financial assets
and financial liabilities at fair value that were not previously required to be
measured at fair value. We have not elected to measure any financial
assets or financial liabilities at fair value that were not previously required
to be measured at fair value.
The Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures section of the Codification defines fair
value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date, and establishes a framework for measuring fair
value. This section also establishes a three-level hierarchy (Level
1, 2 or 3) for fair value measurements based upon the observability of inputs to
the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement
date. This section also requires the consideration of the
counterparty’s or the Company’s nonperformance risk when assessing fair
value.
The
Company’s interest rate swap liabilities fair value was determined using Level 2
inputs as other significant observable inputs were not available.
The
Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash, investments,
long-term debt, interest rate swap agreements and capital lease
obligations. The fair value of our investments exceeded book value at
January 2, 2010, by $226.9 million. The following table summarized
our long-term indebtedness for which the book value was in excess of the fair
value based on quoted market prices:
January
2,
2010
|
||||
First
Priority Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes
|
61.3 | |||
Second
Priority Senior Secured Fixed Rate Notes
|
27.1 | |||
Second
Priority Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes
|
45.0 | |||
11%
Senior Subordinated Notes
|
55.7 | |||
10
¼% Senior Subordinated Notes
|
26.4 |
8. Stockholders’
Equity and Stock Option Plans
In
connection with the merger of Berry Group and Covalence Specialty Materials
Holding Corp. in April of 2007, Berry Group modified its outstanding stock
options to provide for (i) the vesting of an additional twenty percent (20%) of
the total number of shares underlying such outstanding options; (ii) the
conversion of options with escalating exercise prices to a fixed priced option,
with no increase in the exercise price as of the date of grant of such
escalating priced option; and (iii) with respect to each outstanding option, the
vesting of which was contingent upon the achievement of performance goals, the
deemed achievement of all such performance goals. On June 7, 2007,
Berry Group’s Board of Directors declared a special one-time dividend of $77 per
common share and option to shareholders of record as of June 6,
2007. This dividend reduced Berry Group’s shareholders equity for
owned shares by $530.2 million. In connection with this dividend
payment, $34.5 million related to unvested stock options was placed in escrow
and was
-18-
subject
to time based vesting through June 7, 2009. In December 2008, the
Executive Committee of Berry Group modified the vesting provisions related to
the remaining $33.0 million being held in escrow. This resulted in
the immediate vesting and accelerating the recognition of the remaining
unrecorded stock compensation expense of $11.4 million in selling, general and
administrative expenses recorded in the first fiscal quarter of
2009.
9.
Income Taxes
The
effective tax rate from continuing operations was 22.5% and 34.9% for the
quarterly periods ended January 2, 2010 and December 27, 2008,
respectively. A reconciliation of income tax benefit, computed at the
federal statutory rate, to income tax benefit, as provided for in the financial
statements, is as follows:
Quarterly
Period Ended
|
||||||||
January
2,
2010
|
December
27,
2008
|
|||||||
Income
tax benefit computed at statutory rate
|
$ | (13.2 | ) | $ | (15.9 | ) | ||
State
income tax benefit, net of federal taxes
|
(0.6 | ) | (1.0 | ) | ||||
Expenses
not deductible for income tax purposes
|
0.1 | 0.2 | ||||||
Change
in valuation allowance
|
0.9 | 0.2 | ||||||
Non-deductible
ASC 805 Costs
|
3.9 | ― | ||||||
Other
|
0.4 | 0.7 | ||||||
Income
tax benefit
|
$ | (8.5 | ) | $ | (15.8 | ) |
-19-
10.
Operating Segments
Berry’s
operations are organized into five reporting segments: Rigid Open Top, Rigid
Closed Top, Flexible Films, Tapes/Coatings, and Specialty Films. The
Company has manufacturing and distribution centers in the United States, Canada,
Mexico, Belgium, Australia, Germany and India. The Company evaluates
the performance of and allocates resources to these segments based on revenue
and other segment profit measures. The North American operation
represents 93% of the Company’s net sales and 95% of the total
assets. Selected information by reportable segment is presented in
the following table:
Quarterly
Period Ended
|
||||||||
January
2, 2010
|
December
27, 2008
|
|||||||
Net
sales:
|
||||||||
Rigid Open Top
|
$ | 261.6 | $ | 277.0 | ||||
Rigid Closed
Top
|
229.7 | 230.6 | ||||||
Flexible Films
|
206.3 | 237.9 | ||||||
Tapes/Coatings
|
111.1 | 119.5 | ||||||
Specialty Films
|
70.9 | — | ||||||
Total net sales
|
$ | 879.6 | $ | 865.0 | ||||
Operating
income (loss):
|
||||||||
Rigid Open Top
|
$ | 21.5 | $ | 20.0 | ||||
Rigid Closed
Top
|
16.6 | 11.5 | ||||||
Flexible Films
|
(3.0 | ) | 0.3 | |||||
Tapes/Coatings
|
1.7 | (0.2 | ) | |||||
Specialty Films
|
(24.8 | ) | — | |||||
Total operating
income
|
$ | 12.0 | $ | 31.6 | ||||
Depreciation
and amortization:
|
||||||||
Rigid Open Top
|
$ | 22.5 | $ | 19.9 | ||||
Rigid Closed
Top
|
23.0 | 22.1 | ||||||
Flexible Films
|
11.4 | 11.4 | ||||||
Tapes/Coatings
|
8.3 | 8.3 | ||||||
Specialty Films
|
5.6 | — | ||||||
Total depreciation and
amortization
|
$ | 70.8 | $ | 61.7 |
January
2, 2010
|
September
26, 2009
|
|||||||
Total
assets:
|
||||||||
Rigid Open Top
|
$ | 1,936.4 | $ | 1,822.7 | ||||
Rigid Closed
Top
|
1,609.6 | 1,523.0 | ||||||
Flexible Films
|
568.1 | 703.2 | ||||||
Tapes/Coatings
|
392.6 | 352.1 | ||||||
Specialty Films
|
804.6 | — | ||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 5,311.3 | $ | 4,401.0 |
-20-
11. Condensed
Consolidating Financial Information
The
Company has First Priority Senior Secured Fixed and Floating Rate
Notes, Second Priority Senior Secured Fixed and Floating Rate Notes
and 10 ¼% Senior Subordinated Notes outstanding which are fully, jointly,
severally, and unconditionally guaranteed by substantially all of Berry’s
domestic subsidiaries. Separate narrative information or financial
statements of the guarantor subsidiaries have not been included because they are
100% wholly owned by the parent company and the guarantor subsidiaries
unconditionally guarantee such debt on a joint and several
basis. Presented below is condensed consolidating financial
information for the parent company, guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor
subsidiaries. The equity method has been used with respect to
investments in subsidiaries. The principal elimination entries
eliminate investments in subsidiaries and intercompany balances and
transactions.
January
2, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Parent
Company
|
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
Non-guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
Eliminations
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||||||
Consolidating
Balance Sheet
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Current
assets
|
$ | 240.9 | $ | 658.8 | $ | 111.1 | $ | — | $ | 1,010.8 | ||||||||||
Net
property and equipment
|
183.9 | 904.9 | 60.9 | — | 1,149.7 | |||||||||||||||
Other
noncurrent assets
|
4,394.9 | 2,679.0 | 287.6 | (4,210.7 | ) | 3,150.8 | ||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 4,819.7 | $ | 4,242.7 | $ | 459.6 | $ | (4,210.7 | ) | $ | 5,311.3 | |||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
$ | 212.8 | $ | 345.2 | $ | 39.9 | $ | (1.7 | ) | $ | 596.2 | |||||||||
Noncurrent
liabilities
|
4,309.6 | 141.6 | 16.3 | (49.7 | ) | 4,417.8 | ||||||||||||||
Equity
(deficit)
|
297.3 | 3,755.9 | 403.4 | (4,159.3 | ) | 297.3 | ||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and equity (deficit)
|
$ | 4,819.7 | $ | 4,242.7 | $ | 459.6 | $ | (4,210.7 | ) | $ | 5,311.3 |
September
26, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Parent
Company
|
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
Non-guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
Eliminations
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||||||
Consolidating
Balance Sheet
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Current
assets
|
$ | 160.0 | $ | 572.2 | $ | 59.4 | $ | — | $ | 791.6 | ||||||||||
Net
property and equipment
|
183.5 | 657.0 | 35.1 | — | 875.6 | |||||||||||||||
Other
noncurrent assets
|
3,485.6 | 2,299.9 | 269.0 | (3,320.7 | ) | 2,733.8 | ||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 3,829.1 | $ | 3,529.1 | $ | 363.5 | $ | (3,320.7 | ) | $ | 4,401.0 | |||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
$ | 106.2 | $ | 315.7 | $ | 18.7 | $ | (0.4 | ) | $ | 440.2 | |||||||||
Noncurrent
liabilities
|
3,401.2 | 283.5 | 4.0 | (49.6 | ) | 3,639.1 | ||||||||||||||
Equity
(deficit)
|
321.7 | 2,929.9 | 340.8 | (3,270.7 | ) | 321.7 | ||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and equity (deficit)
|
$ | 3,829.1 | $ | 3,529.1 | $ | 363.5 | $ | (3,320.7 | ) | $ | 4,401.0 |
-21-
Quarterly
Period Ended January 2, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Parent
Company
|
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
Eliminations
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 195.6 | $ | 625.1 | $ | 58.9 | $ | — | $ | 879.6 | ||||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
182.2 | 515.7 | 48.7 | — | 746.6 | |||||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
13.4 | 109.4 | 10.2 | — | 133.0 | |||||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
16.2 | 64.8 | 6.9 | — | 87.9 | |||||||||||||||
Restructuring
and impairment charges, net
|
0.4 | 4.7 | 1.5 | — | 6.6 | |||||||||||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
1.5 | 22.7 | 2.3 | — | 26.5 | |||||||||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
(4.7 | ) | 17.2 | (0.5 | ) | — | 12.0 | |||||||||||||
Other
(income) expense
|
(4.2 | ) | (0.2 | ) | — | — | (4.4 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
82.6 | (15.4 | ) | (13.1 | ) | — | 54.1 | |||||||||||||
Equity
in net income of subsidiaries
|
(54.0 | ) | — | — | 54.0 | — | ||||||||||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
(29.1 | ) | 32.8 | 12.6 | (54.0 | ) | (37.7 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
0.1 | (9.4 | ) | 0.8 | — | (8.5 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (29.2 | ) | $ | 42.2 | $ | 11.8 | $ | (54.0 | ) | $ | (29.2 | ) |
Consolidating
Statement of Cash Flows
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net
cash flow from operating activities
|
$ | 1.7 | $ | 57.6 | $ | 6.9 | $ | — | $ | 66.2 | ||||||||||
Investing
activities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase
of property, plant, and equipment
|
(6.7 | ) | (54.3 | ) | (0.6 | ) | — | (61.6 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds
from disposal of assets
|
— | 0.3 | — | — | 0.3 | |||||||||||||||
Investment
in Berry Group, Inc.
|
— | — | (2.0 | ) | — | (2.0 | ) | |||||||||||||
Acquisition
of business net of cash acquired
|
(643.7 | ) | — | — | — | (643.7 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
cash flow from investing activities
|
(650.4 | ) | (54.0 | ) | (2.6 | ) | — | (707.0 | ) | |||||||||||
Financing
activities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds
from long-term borrowings
|
683.3 | — | 2.2 | — | 685.5 | |||||||||||||||
Payments
on long-term borrowings
|
(7.8 | ) | — | — | — | (7.8 | ) | |||||||||||||
Debt
financing costs
|
(24.7 | ) | — | — | — | (24.7 | ) | |||||||||||||
Equity
contributions (distributions), net
|
(2.0 | ) | — | 2.0 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Net
cash flow from financing activities
|
648.8 | — | 4.2 | — | 653.0 | |||||||||||||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
— | — | (0.2 | ) | — | (0.2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash
|
0.1 | 3.6 | 8.3 | — | 12.0 | |||||||||||||||
Cash
at beginning of period
|
6.6 | 0.1 | 3.3 | — | 10.0 | |||||||||||||||
Cash
at end of period
|
$ | 6.7 | $ | 3.7 | $ | 11.6 | $ | — | $ | 22.0 |
-22-
Quarterly
Period Ended December 27, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Parent
Company
|
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
Eliminations
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 214.4 | $ | 595.6 | $ | 55.0 | $ | — | $ | 865.0 | ||||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
195.3 | 495.1 | 47.7 | — | 738.1 | |||||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
19.1 | 100.5 | 7.3 | — | 126.9 | |||||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
28.3 | 55.3 | 5.9 | — | 89.5 | |||||||||||||||
Restructuring
and impairment charges, net
|
0.5 | 0.1 | — | — | 0.6 | |||||||||||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
0.7 | 4.1 | 0.4 | — | 5.2 | |||||||||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
(10.4 | ) | 41.0 | 1.0 | — | 31.6 | ||||||||||||||
Other
(income) expense
|
6.6 | — | — | — | 6.6 | |||||||||||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
81.4 | (13.8 | ) | 2.6 | — | 70.2 | ||||||||||||||
Equity
in net income of subsidiaries
|
(69.0 | ) | — | — | 69.0 | — | ||||||||||||||
Gain
(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
(29.4 | ) | 54.8 | (1.6 | ) | (69.0 | ) | (45.2 | ) | |||||||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
— | (16.0 | ) | 0.2 | — | (15.8 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (29.4 | ) | $ | 70.8 | $ | (1.8 | ) | $ | (69.0 | ) | $ | (29.4 | ) |
Consolidating
Statement of Cash Flows
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net
cash flow from operating activities
|
$ | 87.2 | $ | 23.1 | $ | 1.3 | $ | — | $ | 111.6 | ||||||||||
Investing
activities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Additions
to property and equipment
|
(10.6 | ) | (31.7 | ) | (0.9 | ) | — | (43.2 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds
from disposal of assets
|
— | 0.1 | — | — | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition
of business net of cash acquired
|
(4.3 | ) | — | — | — | (4.3 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
cash flow from investing activities
|
(14.9 | ) | (31.6 | ) | (0.9 | ) | — | (47.4 | ) | |||||||||||
Financing
activities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Payments
on long-term borrowings
|
(81.3 | ) | — | (0.3 | ) | — | (81.6 | ) | ||||||||||||
Equity
contributions (distributions), net
|
(0.5 | ) | — | — | — | (0.5 | ) | |||||||||||||
Debt
financing costs
|
(0.3 | ) | — | — | — | (0.3 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
cash flow from financing activities
|
(82.1 | ) | — | (0.3 | ) | — | (82.4 | ) | ||||||||||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
— | — | (0.9 | ) | — | (0.9 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash
|
(9.8 | ) | (8.5 | ) | (0.8 | ) | — | (19.1 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash
at beginning of period
|
172.6 | 8.7 | 8.4 | — | 189.7 | |||||||||||||||
Cash
at end of period
|
$ | 162.8 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 7.6 | $ | — | $ | 170.6 |
-23-
12. Contingencies
and Commitments
The
Company is party to various legal proceedings involving routine claims which are
incidental to the business. Although the legal and financial
liability with respect to such proceedings cannot be estimated with certainty,
the Company believes that any ultimate liability would not be material to the
business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the
Company.
13. Recent
Financial Accounting Standards
In
June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that establishes the FASB
Codification as the single source of authoritative United States accounting and
reporting standards applicable for all non-government entities, with the
exception of guidance promulgated by the SEC and its staff. The Codification,
which changes the referencing of financial standards, became effective for
interim or annual financial periods ending after September 15, 2009. The
Company implemented the guidance effective in fiscal 2009.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that establishes the
principles and requirements for how an acquirer (i) recognizes and measures
in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities
assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; (ii) recognizes
and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a
bargain purchase; and (iii) determines what information to disclose to
enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial
effects of the business combination. This guidance makes significant changes to
existing accounting practices for acquisitions, including the requirement to
expense transaction costs and to reflect the fair value of contingent purchase
price adjustments at the date of acquisition. In April 2009, the FASB
issued an amendment to amend and clarify the guidance on business combinations
to require that an acquirer recognize at fair value, at the acquisition date, an
asset acquired or a liability assumed in a business combination that arises from
a contingency if the acquisition-date fair value of that asset or liability can
be determined during the measurement period. If the acquisition-date fair value
of such an asset acquired or liability assumed cannot be determined, the
acquirer should apply the provisions of the guidance on business combinations to
determine whether the contingency should be recognized at the acquisition date
or after it. The guidance is effective for business combinations for which the
acquisition date is after the beginning of the first annual reporting period
beginning after December 15, 2008, which is effective for us in fiscal
2010. For any acquisitions completed after fiscal 2009. The Company
accounted for the Pliant and Superfos acquisitions under this new authoritative
guidance.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that establishes
accounting and reporting standards that require (i) noncontrolling
interests to be reported as a component of equity; (ii) changes in a
parent's ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling interest to
be accounted for as equity transactions; and (iii) any retained
noncontrolling equity investment upon the deconsolidation of a subsidiary to be
initially measured at fair value. The guidance is to be applied
prospectively at the beginning of the first annual reporting period on or after
December 15, 2008. The adoption of this guidance did not have a
material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position in
this current Form 10Q.
-24-
14.
Subsequent Events
In
January 2010, BP
Parallel LLC invested $16.2 million to purchase assignments of $20.2 million principal of
Senior Unsecured Term Loan.
In
January 2010, the
Company elected to realign its five reporting segments into four, the Rigid Open
Top, Rigid Closed Top, Specialty Films and Tapes, Bags and
Coating. The realignment was completed in order to better service
customers, accelerate synergy realization and enhance product-line cross
selling.
-25-
Item
2.
Results
of Operations
Unless
the context requires otherwise, references in this Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations to “Company” refer to
Berry Plastics Corporation, references to “we,” “our” or “us” refer to Berry
Plastics Corporation together with its consolidated subsidiaries, after giving
effect to the transactions described in the next paragraph. You
should read the following discussion in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries and the accompanying
notes thereto, which information is included elsewhere herein. The
Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Berry Plastics Group,
Inc. This discussion contains forward-looking statements and involves
numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described
in our Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the fiscal year ended September 26, 2009
section titled “Risk Factors” and other risk factors identified from time to
time in our periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Our actual results may differ materially from those
contained in any forward-looking statements. You should read the
explanation of the qualifications and limitations on these forward-looking
statements starting on page 3 of this report.
Acquisitions
We
maintain a selective and disciplined acquisition strategy, which is focused on
improving our long term financial performance, enhancing our market positions
and expanding our product lines or, in some cases, providing us with a new or
complementary product line. Most businesses we have acquired had
profit margins that are lower than that of our existing business, which resulted
in a temporary decrease in our margins. We have historically achieved
significant reductions in manufacturing and overhead costs of acquired companies
by introducing advanced manufacturing processes, exiting low-margin businesses
or product lines, reducing headcount, rationalizing facilities and machinery,
applying best practices and capitalizing on economies of scale. In
connection with our acquisitions, we have in the past and may in the future
incur charges related to these reductions and rationalizations.
The
Company has a long history of acquiring and integrating
companies. The Company has been able to achieve these synergies by
eliminating duplicative costs, rationalizing facilities and integrating
production into the most efficient operating facility. While the
expected benefits on earnings are estimated at the commencement of each
transaction, once the execution of the plan and integration occur, we are
generally unable to accurately estimate or track what the ultimate effects on
future earnings have been due to systems integrations and movement of activities
to multiple facilities. The historical business combinations have not
allowed the Company to accurately separate realized synergies compared to what
was initially identified during the due diligence phase of each
acquisition.
The
Company has included the expected impact of restructuring plans within our
unrealized synergies which are in turn recognized in earnings after the
restructuring plans are completed. While the expected benefits on
earnings is estimated at the commencement of each plan, due to the nature of the
matters we are generally unable to accurately estimate or track what the
ultimate
-26-
effects
have been. The Company intends to fund these restructuring plans with
cash available on hand.
Recent
Developments
Pliant
Corporation.
On
December 3, 2009, the Company obtained control of 100% of the capital stock of
Pliant upon Pliant’s emergence from reorganization pursuant to a proceeding
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code for a purchase price of $602.7 million
($576.5 million, net of cash acquired). Pliant is a leading
manufacturer of value-added films and flexible packaging for food, personal
care, medical, agricultural and industrial applications. The acquired
business was operated as Berry’s newly formed Specialty Films reporting
segment. The purchase price was funded utilizing the proceeds from
private placement offerings, consisting of $370.0 million aggregate principal
amount of 81/4% first
priority senior secured fixed rate notes (“First Priority Fixed Rate Notes”) and
$250.0 million additional principal amount of 87/8% second
priority senior secured fixed rate notes (“Second Priority Fixed Rate Notes”)
discussed in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements section of this
Form 10-Q.
Superfos
Packaging, Inc.
In
December 2009, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock of
Superfos Packaging, Inc., a manufacturer of injection molded plastic rigid open
top containers and other plastic packaging products primarily for food,
industrial and personal care end markets. The newly added business
will be operated in Berry’s Rigid Open Top Division.
Executive
Summary
Business. During
the quarter, the Company operated five operating segments: Rigid Open Top, Rigid
Closed Top, Flexible Films, Tapes/Coatings, and Specialty Films. The
Rigid Open Top division sells products in three categories including containers,
foodservice items and home and party. The Rigid Closed Top division
sells products in three categories including closures and overcaps, bottles and
prescription containers and tubes. The Flexible Films division sells
primarily plastic trash bags, stretch film and plastic sheeting to the
agricultural, horticultural institutional, foodservice and retail
markets. Our Tapes/Coatings division sells specialty adhesive
products and flexible packaging and building materials to a variety of different
industries including building and construction, retail, automotive, industrial
and medical markets. Our Specialty Films division sells value-added
film and flexible packaging products for personal care, medical, food,
industrial and agricultural markets to a variety of flexible packaging
markets.
-27-
Raw Material
Trends. Polypropylene and
polyethylene account for more than 80% of our plastic resin pound
purchases. The average industry prices, as published in industry
sources, per pound by fiscal quarter were as follows:
Polyethylene
Butene Film
|
Polypropylene
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||
1st
quarter
|
$ | .71 | $ | .67 | $ | .82 | $ | .70 | $ | .56 | $ | .85 | ||||||||||||
2nd
quarter
|
— | .59 | .84 | — | .46 | .80 | ||||||||||||||||||
3rd
quarter
|
— | .64 | .91 | — | .53 | .89 | ||||||||||||||||||
4th
quarter
|
— | .68 | 1.00 | — | .67 | .99 |
Plastic
resins are subject to price fluctuations, including those arising from supply
shortages and changes in the prices of natural gas, crude oil and other
petrochemical intermediates from which resins are produced.
Outlook. The Company is impacted
by general economic and industrial growth, housing starts, plastic resin
availability and affordability, and general industrial production. Our business
has both geographic and end market diversity which reduces the impact of any one
of these factors on our overall performance. We are impacted by our ability to
maintain selling prices, manage fluctuations in raw material pricing and adapt
to volume changes of our customers. We expect continued strength
in our thermoforming product lines, which would have a positive impact on
volumes in our Rigid Open Top segment. We expect our bottle business
to continue to grow as a result of recent increased quoting activity and strong
new product pipeline, which would have a positive impact in or Rigid Closed Top
segment. We anticipate continued softness in U.S. housing starts in
2010 that will impact both our Tapes, Bags and Coatings and Specialty Films
segments. In order to manage the continual pressure from customers to
reduce selling prices we are constantly focused on improving our overall
profitability by implementing cost reduction programs for our manufacturing,
selling, general and administrative expenses.
Results
of Operations
Comparison
of the Quarterly Period Ended January 2, 2010 (the “Quarter”) and the Quarterly
Period Ended December 27, 2008 (the “Prior Quarter”)
Net Sales. Net
sales increased by 2% to $879.6 million for the Quarter from $865.0 million for
the Prior Quarter. This $14.6 million increase includes acquisition
volume increase of 8% and a base volume increase of 14% partially offset by net
selling price decreases of 20%. The following discussion in this
section provides a comparison of net sales by business segment.
Quarterly
Period Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
January
2, 2010
|
December
27, 2008
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
|||||||||||||
Net
sales:
|
||||||||||||||||
Rigid Open Top
|
$ | 261.6 | $ | 277.0 | $ | (15.4 | ) | (5.6 | %) | |||||||
Rigid Closed
Top
|
229.7 | 230.6 | (0.9 | ) | (0.4 | %) | ||||||||||
Flexible Films
|
206.3 | 237.9 | (31.6 | ) | (13.3 | %) | ||||||||||
Tapes/Coatings
|
111.1 | 119.5 | (8.4 | ) | (7.0 | %) | ||||||||||
Specialty Films
|
70.9 | — | 70.9 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
Total net sales
|
$ | 879.6 | $ | 865.0 | $ | 14.6 | 1.7 | % |
Net sales
in the Rigid Open Top segment decreased from $277.0 million in the Prior Quarter
to $261.6 million in the Quarter as a result of net selling price decreases of
27% offset by base
-28-
volume
growth of 21%. The base volume growth is primarily attributed to
increased sales in various container product lines, thermoformed drink cups and
houseware product lines. Net sales in the Rigid Closed Top business
decreased from $230.6 million in the Prior Quarter to $229.7 million in the
Quarter as a result of net selling price decreases of 20% offset by base volume
growth of 20%. The base volume growth is primarily attributed to
increased sales in our overcaps, closures, bottles and prescription vial product
lines. The Flexible Films business net sales decreased from $237.9
million in the Prior Quarter to $206.3 million in the Quarter as a result of a
result of net selling price decreases of 23% offset by base volume growth of
10%. The base volume growth is primarily attributed to increased
sales in our institutional can liners and stretch film product
lines. Net sales in the Tapes/Coatings business decreased from $119.5
million in the Prior Quarter to $111.1 million in the Quarter primarily as a
result of base volume decline of 7% primarily attributed to softness in the new
home construction and corrosion protection markets. Net sales in the
Specialty Films business increased to $70.9 million for the Quarter as a result
of acquisition volume growth attributed to the Pliant transaction.
Gross
Profit. Gross profit increased by $6.1 million to $133.0
million (15% of net sales) for the Quarter from $126.9 million (15% of net
sales) for the Prior Quarter. This increase is primarily attributed
to higher sales volumes, realization of synergies and cost reduction efforts
partially offset by a timing lag of passing through raw material costs to our
customers.
Operating
Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
decreased by $1.6 million to $87.9 million for the Quarter from $89.5 million
for the Prior Quarter primarily as a result of a decrease in stock compensation
expense offset by increased amortization of intangibles due to the Pliant
acquisition. Restructuring and impairment charges increased by $6.0
million to $6.6 million in the Quarter compared to $0.6 million in the Prior
Quarter primarily as a result of $4.0 million of severance charges related to
Pliant during the Quarter. Acquisition costs of $19.2 million in the
Quarter are attributed to the Pliant and Superfos acquisitions.
Operating
Income. Operating income decreased $19.6 million from $31.6 million
in the Prior Quarter to $12.0 million in the Quarter. The following
discussion in this section provides a comparison of operating income by business
segment.
Quarterly
Periods Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
January
2, 2010
|
December
27, 2008
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
|||||||||||||
Operating
income (loss):
|
||||||||||||||||
Rigid Open Top
|
$ | 21.5 | $ | 20.0 | $ | 1.5 | 7.5 | % | ||||||||
Rigid Closed
Top
|
16.6 | 11.5 | 5.1 | 44.3 | % | |||||||||||
Flexible Films
|
(3.0 | ) | 0.3 | (3.3 | ) | (1,100 | )% | |||||||||
Tapes/Coatings
|
1.7 | (0.2 | ) | 1.9 | 950 | % | ||||||||||
Specialty Films
|
(24.8 | ) | — | (24.8 | ) | N/A | % | |||||||||
Total operating
income
|
$ | 12.0 | $ | 31.6 | $ | (19.6 | ) | 0.0 | % |
Operating
income for the Rigid Open Top business increased from $20.0 million for the
Prior Quarter to $21.5 million in the Quarter. The increase of $1.5
million is attributable to base volume growth offset by a timing lag of passing
through increases in raw material costs to our customers. Operating
income for the Rigid Closed Top business increased from $11.5 million
for
-29-
the Prior
Quarter to $16.6 million in the Quarter. The increase of $5.1 million
is primarily attributable to base volume growth. Operating income for
the Flexible Film business decreased from $0.3 million for the Prior Quarter to
an operating loss of $3.0 million in the Quarter. The decrease of
$3.3 million is primarily attributable to a negative selling price to raw
material relationship offset by base volume growth and various cost reduction
efforts. Operating income for the Tapes/Coatings business increased
from an operating loss of $0.2 million for the Prior Quarter to an operating
income of $1.7 million in the Quarter. The increase of $1.9 million
is primarily attributable to improved operating performance and increased
selling prices. The operating loss for the Specialty Films business
is primarily related to transaction costs attributed to the acquisition of
Pliant.
Other Income. Other income
recorded in the Quarter is primarily attributed to the fair value adjustment for
our interest rate swaps.
Interest
Expense. Interest expense decreased by $0.2 million in the
Quarter primarily as a result of a decline in borrowing rates on variable rate
debt offset by increased borrowings to finance the Pliant
acquisition.
Interest
Income. Interest income increased $15.9 million to $16.4
million for the Quarter from $0.5 million in Prior Quarter. The
increase in primarily attributed to interest and accretion income from our
investments in Berry Group’s senior unsecured term loan.
Income Tax Expense
(Benefit). For the Quarter, we recorded an income tax benefit
of $8.5 million as compared to an income tax benefit of $15.8 million in the
Prior Quarter. The effective tax rate is less then the statutory rate
for the Quarter, primarily due to the non-deductibility of acquisition
costs.
Net Loss. Net loss
was $29.2 million for the Quarter compared to a net loss of $29.4 million for
the Prior Quarter for the reasons discussed above.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Senior
Secured Credit Facility
The
Company’s senior secured credit facilities consist of $1,200.0 million term loan
and $481.7 million asset based revolving line of credit, net of defaulting
lenders. The availability under the revolving line of credit is the
lesser of $500.0 million or based on a defined borrowing base which is
calculated based on available accounts receivable and inventory. The
term loan matures on April 3, 2015 and the revolving line of credit matures on
April 3, 2013. The LIBOR rate on the term loan and the line of credit
were 0.25% and 0.24% at January 2, 2010, respectively, determined by reference
to the costs of funds for eurodollar deposits in dollars in the LIBOR for the
interest period relevant to such borrowing plus the applicable
margin. The applicable margin for LIBOR rate borrowings under the
revolving credit facility ranges from 1.25% to 1.75% and for the term loan is
2.00%. The line of credit is also subject to an unused commitment fee
for unused borrowings ranging from 0.25% to 0.35% per annum and a letter of
credit fee of 0.125% per annum for each letter of credit that is
issued. The revolving line of credit allows up to
$100.0
-30-
million
of letters of credit to be issued instead of borrowings under the revolving line
of credit. At January 2, 2010, the Company had $22.0 million of cash
and $156.0 million outstanding on the revolving credit facility providing unused
borrowing capacity of $292.0 million under the revolving line of credit subject
to the solvency of our lenders to fund their obligations and our borrowing base
calculations. The Company was in compliance with all covenants at
January 2, 2010.
Our fixed
charge coverage ratio, as defined in the revolving credit facility, is
calculated based on a numerator consisting of Adjusted EBITDA less pro forma
adjustments, income taxes paid in cash and capital expenditures, and a
denominator consisting of scheduled principal payments in respect of
indebtedness for borrowed money, interest expense and certain
distributions. We are obligated to sustain a minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 under the revolving credit facility at any time
when the aggregate unused capacity under the revolving credit facility is less
than 10% of the lesser of the revolving credit facility commitments and the
borrowing base (and for 10 business days following the date upon which
availability exceeds such threshold) or during the continuation of an event of
default. At January 2, 2010, the Company had unused borrowing
capacity of $292.0 million under the revolving credit facility subject to a
borrowing base and thus was not subject to the minimum fixed charge coverage
ratio covenant. Our fixed charge ratio as of January 2, 2010 was 1.0
to 1.0.
Despite
not having financial maintenance covenants, our debt agreements contain certain
negative covenants. The failure to comply with these negative
covenants could restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness, effect
acquisitions, enter into certain significant business combinations, make
distributions or redeem indebtedness. The term loan facility contains
a negative covenant first lien secured leverage ratio covenant of 4.0 to 1.0 on
a pro forma basis for a proposed transaction, such as an acquisition or
incurrence of additional first lien debt. Our first lien secured
leverage ratio was 3.5 to 1.0 as of January 2, 2010.
-31-
A key
financial metric utilized in the calculation of the first lien leverage ratio is
Adjusted EBITDA. The following table reconciles our Adjusted EBITDA
for the twelve months ended January 2, 2010 to net loss.
Four
Quarters ended
January
2, 2010
|
||||
Adjusted EBITDA (a)
|
$ | 666.4 | ||
Net interest
expense
|
(228.4 | ) | ||
Depreciation and
amortization
|
(262.6 | ) | ||
Income tax
benefit
|
(1.0 | ) | ||
Business optimization expense
(b)
|
(40.4 | ) | ||
Restructuring and impairment
(c)
|
(17.3 | ) | ||
Management fees
|
(6.5 | ) | ||
Other non-cash
income
|
34.5 | |||
Pro
forma acquisitions
|
(97.9 | ) | ||
Pro forma cost
reductions
|
(11.7 | ) | ||
Pro forma synergies (d)
|
(61.1 | ) | ||
Net loss
|
$ | 26.0 |
Cash flow from operating
activities
|
$ | 369.0 | ||
Cash flow from investing
activities
|
$ | (1,023.8 | ) | |
Cash flow from financing
activities
|
$ | 505.7 |
|
(a)
|
Includes
$3.8 million of Pliant adjusted EBITDA from the date of
acquisition
|
|
(b)
|
Includes
$19.2 million of transaction costs attributed to the Pliant and
Superfos acquisitions
|
|
(c)
|
Includes
$7.8 of non-cash asset impairments
|
|
(d)
|
Represents
synergies related to the following: Pliant ($50.0 million), Superfos ($1.6
million), Covalence ($2.2 million), Captive ($5.0 million) and Erie ($2.3
million)
|
-32-
For
comparison purposes, the following table reconciles our Adjusted EBITDA for the
quarterly period ended January 2, 2010 and December 27, 2008.
Quarterly
Period Ended
|
||||||||
January
2, 2010
|
December
27, 2008
|
|||||||
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$ | 148.1 | $ | 148.7 | ||||
Net interest
expense
|
(54.1 | ) | (70.2 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and
amortization
|
(70.8 | ) | (61.7 | ) | ||||
Income tax
benefit
|
8.5 | 15.8 | ||||||
Business optimization
expense
|
(25.0 | ) | (3.8 | ) | ||||
Restructuring and impairment
(a)
|
(6.6 | ) | (0.6 | ) | ||||
Stock based
compensation
|
(0.3 | ) | (11.6 | ) | ||||
Management fees
|
(1.5 | ) | (1.4 | ) | ||||
Other non-cash income
(expense)
|
4.1 | (6.6 | ) | |||||
Pro
forma acquisitions
|
(15.4 | ) | (13.9 | ) | ||||
Pro forma cost
reductions
|
(1.5 | ) | (6.0 | ) | ||||
Pro forma
synergies
|
(14.7 | ) | (18.1 | ) | ||||
Net income
(loss)
|
$ | (29.2 | ) | $ | (29.4 | ) |
Cash flow from operating
activities
|
$ | 66.2 | $ | 111.6 | ||||
Cash flow from investing
activities
|
$ | (707.0 | ) | $ | (47.4 | ) | ||
Cash flow from financing
activities
|
$ | 653.0 | $ | (82.4 | ) |
While the
determination of appropriate adjustments in the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA
is subject to interpretation under the terms of the our senior secured credit
facilities, management believes the adjustments described above are in
accordance with the covenants in the senior secured credit
facilities. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or
construed as an alternative to our net loss, operating cash flows or other
measures as determined in accordance with GAAP. In addition, other
companies in our industry or across different industries may calculate bank
covenants and related definitions differently than we do, limiting the
usefulness of our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA as a comparative
measure.
Cash
Flows
Net cash
provided by operating activities was $66.2 million for the Quarter compared to
$111.6 million for the Prior Quarter. This decrease of $45.4 million
is primarily the result of a $22.7 million change in working capital and
acquisition costs incurred in the Quarter of $19.2 million.
Net cash
used for investing activities increased from $47.4 million for the Prior Quarter
to $707.0 million for the Quarter primarily as a result of the Pliant and
Superfos acquisitions and increased capital spending. Our capital
expenditures are forecasted to be approximately $220 million for fiscal 2010 and
will be funded from cash flows from operating activities and availability under
our revolving credit facilities.
-33-
Net cash
provided by financing activities was $653.0 million for the Quarter compared to
net cash used for $82.4 million for the Prior Quarter. This change of
$735.4 million is primarily attributed to the borrowing of the First and Second
Priority Fixed Rate Notes to fund the Pliant acquisition in the
Quarter.
Based on
our current level of operations, we believe that cash flow from operations and
available cash, together with available borrowings under our senior secured
credit facilities, will be adequate to meet our short-term liquidity needs over
the next twelve months. We base such belief on historical experience
and the funds available under the senior secured credit
facility. However, we cannot predict our future results of operations
and our ability to meet our obligations involves numerous risks and
uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described in the “Risk
Factors” section of our Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission for the fiscal year ended September 26, 2009. In
particular, increases in the cost of resin which we are unable to pass through
to our customers on a timely basis or significant acquisitions could severely
impact our liquidity. At January 2, 2010, our cash balance was $22.0
million, and we had unused borrowing capacity of $292.0 million under our
revolving line of credit, net of defaulting lenders.
Accounts
Receivable and Inventory
January
2, 2010
|
September
26, 2009
|
|||||||
Net
Sales (last 12 months)
|
$ | 3,201.7 | $ | 3,187.1 | ||||
Average
Accounts Receivable
|
381.6 | 377.9 | ||||||
AR
Turnover Rate (a)
|
8.4 | 8.4 | ||||||
Cost
of Goods Sold (last 12 months)
|
$ | 2,649.5 | $ | 2,641.0 | ||||
Average
Inventory
|
457.3 | 437.2 | ||||||
Inventory
Turnover Rate (b)
|
5.8 | 6.0 |
(a) Accounts Receivable
Turnover Rate = Revenue for the last twelve months divided by average accounts
receivable.
(b) Inventory Turnover Rate =
Cost of goods sold for the last twelve months divided by average ending
inventory.
-34-
We
disclosed those accounting policies that we consider to be significant in
determining the amounts to be utilized for communicating our consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows in the Form 10-K filed
with the SEC for the fiscal year ended September 26, 2009. Our
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are
based on our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
these principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying
notes. Actual results are likely to differ from these estimates, but
management does not believe such differences will materially affect our
financial position or results of operations, although no assurance can be given
as to such affect. The following critical accounting policies have
been updated for the period ended January 2, 2010.
Goodwill and Other Indefinite Lived
Intangible Assets. We are required to perform
a review for impairment of goodwill and other indefinite lived intangibles to
evaluate whether events and circumstances have occurred that may indicate a
potential impairment. Goodwill is considered to be impaired if we determine that
the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair
value. Other indefinite lived intangibles are considered to be
impaired if the carrying value excess the fair value. In addition to
the annual review, an interim review is required if an event occurs or
circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a
reporting unit below its carrying amount. Examples of such events or
circumstances could include, but are not limited to: a significant decline in
our earnings, a significant decline in the total value of our Company,
unanticipated competition or a loss of key personnel.
The
following table presents carrying value as of our most recent evaluation for
impairment of goodwill compared to Goodwill by reportable segment:
Carrying
Value as of
|
Goodwill
as of
|
|||||||||||
July
1, 2009
|
January
2, 2010
|
September
26, 2009
|
||||||||||
Rigid Open Top
|
$ | 1,572.6 | $ | 703.6 | $ | 646.3 | ||||||
Rigid Closed
Top
|
1,364.1 | 769.7 | 768.1 | |||||||||
Flexible Films
|
427.1 | 16.8 | 16.8 |
In
accordance with our policy, we completed our most recent annual evaluation for
impairment of goodwill as of the first day of the fourth fiscal quarter of 2009.
Based on this evaluation we determined that no impairment existed. Our
evaluation method included management estimates of cash flow projections based
on an internal strategic review and comparable EBITDA multiples of our market
peer companies to derive our fair values. A decline of greater than
10% in the fair value of our Rigid Open Top and Rigid Closed Top segments could
result in a potential impairment of goodwill or trademarks depending on revenue
or earnings growth, the cost of capital and other factors we utilize to
determine our segment and trademark fair values. Our Flexible Films
Segment would need to decline more than 20% to result in a potential
impairment. For purposes of this test, we held our EBITDA as a
percentage of revenue consistent with our
-35-
margins
as of the testing date. Growth by reporting unit varies from
year-to-year between segments. For purposes of this test, the Rigid
Open Top forecasted overall growth ranges between 4.0% and 5.0% in the following
five years and 3.0% in the terminal year. The Rigid Closed Top
forecasted overall growth ranges between 3.0% and 4.3% in the following five
years and 3.0% in the terminal year. We assumed that the Company
would maintain capital spending of approximately $175 million to continue to
increase efficiencies in production and have assumed that these efficiencies
would be offset by other rising costs in selling, general and administrative
expenses. Given the uncertainty in economic trends, there can be no
assurance that when we complete our future annual or other periodic reviews for
impairment of goodwill that a material impairment charge will not be
recorded. There was not indicators of impairment in the first fiscal
quarter of 2010. Goodwill and indefinite lived trademarks totaled
$1.7 billion and $220.2 million at January 2, 2010, respectively, and includes
goodwill from the Pliant and Superfos acquisitions which occurred in the first
fiscal quarter of 2010.
Based on
a critical assessment of our accounting policies and the underlying judgments
and uncertainties affecting the application of those policies, we believe that
our Consolidated Financial Statements provide a meaningful and fair perspective
of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. This is not to
suggest that other risk factors such as changes in economic conditions, changes
in material costs, our ability to pass through changes in material costs, and
others could not materially adversely impact our consolidated financial
position, results of operations and cash flows in future periods.
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
We are
exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates primarily through our
senior secured credit facilities, senior secured first priority notes and second
priority senior secured notes. Our senior secured credit facilities
are comprised of (i) a $1,200.0 million term loan and (ii) a $500.0
million revolving credit facility. At January 2, 2010, $156.0 million
was outstanding on the revolving credit facility. The net outstanding
balance of the term loan was $1,167.0 million at January 2,
2010. Borrowings under our senior secured credit facilities bear
interest, at our option, at either an alternate base rate or an adjusted
LIBOR rate for a one-, two-, three- or six month interest period, or a nine- or
twelve-month period, if available to all relevant lenders, in each case, plus an
applicable margin. The alternate base rate is the mean
the greater of (i) Credit Suisse’s prime rate and (ii) one-half
of 1.0% over the weighted average of rates on overnight Federal Funds as
published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Our $680.6 million
of senior secured first priority notes accrue interest at a rate per annum,
reset quarterly, equal to LIBOR plus 4.75%. Our second priority senior secured
notes are comprised of (i) $525.0 million fixed rate notes and (ii) $225.0
million floating rate notes. The floating rate notes bear interest at
a rate of LIBOR plus 3.875% per annum, which resets quarterly.
At
January 2, 2010, the LIBOR rate of 0.25% was applicable to the term loan, senior
secured first priority notes and second priority floating rate
notes. If the LIBOR rate increases 0.25% and
-36-
0.50%, we
estimate an annual increase in our interest expense of $4.8 million and $9.6
million, respectively.
In August
2007, Berry entered into two separate interest rate swap transactions to protect
$600.0 million of the outstanding variable rate term loan debt from future
interest rate volatility. The swap agreements became effective in
November 2007. The first agreement had a notional amount of $300.0
million and became effective November 5, 2007 and swaps three month variable
LIBOR contracts for a fixed two year rate of 4.875% and expired on November 5,
2009. The second agreement had a notional amount of $300.0 million
and became effective November 5, 2007 and swaps three month variable LIBOR
contracts for a fixed three year rate of 4.920% and expires on November 5,
2010. The Company’s term loan gives it the option to elect different
interest rate reset options. On November 5, 2008, the Company began
to utilize 1-month LIBOR contracts for the underlying senior term
loan. The Company’s change in interest rate selection caused the
Company to lose hedge accounting. The Company has recorded all
subsequent changes in fair value from November 5, 2008 to January 2, 2010 in the
statement of operations and is amortizing the interest rate swap balance in
Accumulated other comprehensive income to Interest expense through the end of
the respective swap agreement. The Company estimates the fair value
of the interest rate swap transactions identified above to be a liability of
$10.8 million and $14.9 million as of January 2, 2010 and September 26, 2009,
respectively. The fair value of these interest rate swaps is subject
to movements in LIBOR and may fluctuate in future periods. A .25%
change in LIBOR would not have a material impact on the fair value of the
interest rate swaps.
Resin
Cost Sensitivity
We are
exposed to market risk from changes in plastic resin prices that could impact
our results of operations and financial condition. Our plastic resin
purchasing strategy is to deal with only high-quality, dependable suppliers,
such as Chevron, DAK Americas, Dow, Dupont, Eastman Chemical, Exxon Mobil, Flint
Hills Resources, Georgia Gulf, Lyondell/Bassell, Nova, PolyOne Corp., Sunoco,
Total, and Westlake. We believe that we have maintained strong
relationships with these key suppliers and expect that such relationships will
continue into the foreseeable future. The resin market is a global
market and, based on our experience, we believe that adequate quantities of
plastic resins will be available at market prices, but we can give you no
assurances as to such availability or the prices thereof. If the
price of resin increased or decreased by 5% this would result in a material
change to our cost of goods sold.
|
(a)
|
Evaluation
of disclosure controls and
procedures.
|
Under
applicable SEC regulations, management of a reporting company, with the
participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, must periodically evaluate the company’s “disclosure controls and
procedures,” which are defined generally as controls and other procedures of a
reporting company designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
by the reporting company in its periodic
-37-
reports
filed with the commission (such as this Form 10-Q) is recorded, processed,
summarized, and reported on a timely basis.
The
Company's management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and
the Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of
the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures as of January
2, 2010. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of January 2, 2010, the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the
reasonable assurance level.
|
(b)
|
Changes
in internal controls.
|
There was
no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the quarter ended January 2, 2010, that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
Part
II. Other Information
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
There has
been no material changes in legal proceedings from the items disclosed in our
Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year
ended September 26, 2009.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
You
should carefully consider the risks described in our Form 10-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended September 26, 2009,
including those under the heading “Risk Factors” and other information
contained in this Quarterly Report before investing in our securities.
Realization of any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, cash flows and results of
operations. There were no material changes in the Company’s risk
factors since described in our Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission for the fiscal year ended September 26, 2009.
Not Applicable
Item
3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not
Applicable
-38-
Not Applicable
Item
5. Other Information
Not Applicable
Item
6. Exhibits
|
31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
31.2
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
32.1
|
Section
1350 Certification of the Chief Executive
Officer
|
32.2 Section 1350
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
-39-
SIGNATURE
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
Berry Plastics
Corporation
February
16, 2010
By: /s/ James M.
Kratochvil
James M. Kratochvil
Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
-40-