Attached files

file filename
EX-32 - EXHIBIT 32 - AMERIGAS PARTNERS LPc95305exv32.htm
EX-10.1 - EXHIBIT 10.1 - AMERIGAS PARTNERS LPc95305exv10w1.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - AMERIGAS PARTNERS LPc95305exv31w1.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - AMERIGAS PARTNERS LPc95305exv31w2.htm
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2009
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission file number 1-13692
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charters)
     
Delaware   23-2787918
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)   Identification No.)
460 North Gulph Road, King of Prussia, PA 19406
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(610) 337-7000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer þ   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
At January 31, 2010, there were 57,054,888 Common Units of AmeriGas Partners, L.P. outstanding.
 
 

 

 


 

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
    PAGES  
Part I Financial Information
       
 
       
Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)
       
 
       
    1  
 
       
    2  
 
       
    3  
 
       
    4  
 
       
    5 - 15  
 
       
    16 - 22  
 
       
    22 - 23  
 
       
    24  
 
       
       
 
       
    25  
 
       
    25  
 
       
    26  
 
       
 Exhibit 10.1
 Exhibit 31.1
 Exhibit 31.2
 Exhibit 32

 

-i-


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars)
                         
    December 31,     September 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2009 (1)     2008 (1)  
ASSETS
                       
 
                       
Current assets:
                       
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 10,486     $ 59,213     $ 42,032  
Accounts receivable (less allowances for doubtful accounts of $12,936 $13,239 and $24,610, respectively)
    271,065       136,147       267,057  
Accounts receivable — related parties
    6,888       5,851       4,888  
Inventories
    119,850       87,940       105,646  
Derivative financial instruments
    43,757       14,970       600  
Collateral deposits
                131,784  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    11,357       12,386       15,856  
 
                 
Total current assets
    463,403       316,507       567,863  
 
                       
Property, plant and equipment (less accumulated depreciation and amortization of $821,470, $804,239 and $752,464, respectively)
    637,325       628,899       622,639  
Goodwill
    666,404       665,663       660,597  
Intangible assets (less accumulated amortization of $25,363, $23,970 and $21,350, respectively)
    32,894       32,611       31,433  
Other assets
    12,618       13,884       14,476  
 
                 
 
                       
Total assets
  $ 1,812,644     $ 1,657,564     $ 1,897,008  
 
                 
 
                       
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
                       
 
                       
Current liabilities:
                       
Current maturities of long-term debt
  $ 82,705     $ 82,225     $ 71,249  
Bank loans
    24,000             146,000  
Accounts payable — trade
    212,845       115,041       179,066  
Accounts payable — related parties
    4,393       2,252       1,830  
Customer deposits and advances
    68,293       87,760       83,148  
Derivative financial instruments
    15,633       19,284       158,369  
Other current liabilities
    88,452       114,043       86,486  
 
                 
Total current liabilities
    496,321       420,605       726,148  
 
                       
Long-term debt
    784,146       783,419       861,756  
Other noncurrent liabilities
    74,224       77,215       89,047  
 
                       
Commitments and contingencies (note 6)
                       
 
                       
Partners’ capital:
                       
AmeriGas Partners, L.P. partners’ capital:
                       
Common unitholders (units issued - 57,054,888, 57,046,388 and
    412,471       367,708       394,350  
57,013,951, respectively)
                       
General partner
    4,149       3,698       3,963  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
    28,799       (6,947 )     (188,481 )
 
                 
Total AmeriGas Partners, L.P. partners’ capital
    445,419       364,459       209,832  
Noncontrolling interests
    12,534       11,866       10,225  
 
                 
Total partners’ capital
    457,953       376,325       220,057  
 
                 
Total liabilities and partners’ capital
  $ 1,812,644     $ 1,657,564     $ 1,897,008  
 
                 
     
(1)  
As adjusted in accordance with the transition provisions for accounting for noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries (Note 3).
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

- 1 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except per unit amounts)
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    December 31,  
    2009     2008 (1)  
 
       
Revenues:
               
Propane
  $ 614,358     $ 678,628  
Other
    42,237       48,436  
 
           
 
    656,595       727,064  
 
           
Costs and expenses:
               
Cost of sales — propane (excluding depreciation shown below)
    375,449       428,469  
Cost of sales — other (excluding depreciation shown below)
    14,120       17,069  
Operating and administrative expenses
    146,814       159,985  
Depreciation
    19,983       19,420  
Amortization
    1,398       1,323  
Gain on sale of California storage facility
          (39,887 )
Other income, net
    (3,783 )     (4,081 )
 
           
 
    553,981       582,298  
 
           
Operating income
    102,614       144,766  
Interest expense
    (16,493 )     (18,725 )
 
           
Income before income taxes
    86,121       126,041  
Income taxes
    (1,167 )     (637 )
 
           
Net income
    84,954       125,404  
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    (995 )     (1,441 )
 
           
Net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners, L.P.
  $ 83,959     $ 123,963  
 
           
 
               
General partner’s interest in net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners, L.P.
  $ 1,407     $ 1,545  
 
           
Limited partners’ interest in net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners, L.P.
  $ 82,552     $ 122,418  
 
           
 
               
Income per limited partner unit — basic and diluted (note 2)
               
Basic
  $ 1.15     $ 1.50  
 
           
Diluted
  $ 1.15     $ 1.50  
 
           
Average limited partner units outstanding (thousands):
               
Basic
    57,055       57,014  
 
           
Diluted
    57,105       57,062  
 
           
     
(1)  
As adjusted in accordance with the transition provisions for accounting for noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries (Note 3).
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

- 2 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars)
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    December 31,  
    2009     2008 (1)  
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
               
Net income
  $ 84,954     $ 125,404  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    21,381       20,743  
Provision for uncollectible accounts
    3,236       8,589  
Gain on sale of California LPG storage facility
          (39,887 )
Net change in settled accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
    3,841       (11,408 )
Other, net
    (143 )     (1,590 )
Net change in:
               
Accounts receivable
    (138,657 )     (56,193 )
Inventories
    (31,725 )     39,663  
Accounts payable
    99,945       5,342  
Collateral deposits
          (113,954 )
Other current assets
    1,050       12,740  
Other current liabilities
    (47,302 )     (57,449 )
 
           
Net cash used by operating activities
    (3,420 )     (68,000 )
 
           
 
               
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
               
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment
    (26,726 )     (19,139 )
Proceeds from disposals of assets
    1,566       1,605  
Net proceeds from sale of California LPG storage facility
          42,426  
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired
    (4,386 )     (33,784 )
 
           
Net cash used by investing activities
    (29,546 )     (8,892 )
 
           
 
               
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
               
Distributions
    (39,186 )     (37,166 )
Noncontrolling interest activity
    (687 )     (667 )
Increase in bank loans
    24,000       146,000  
Repayment of long-term debt
    (201 )     (271 )
Proceeds from issuance of Common Units, net of tax withheld
    310       118  
Capital contributions from General Partner
    3       1  
 
           
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities
    (15,761 )     108,015  
 
           
 
       
Cash and cash equivalents (decrease) increase
  $ (48,727 )   $ 31,123  
 
           
 
               
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
               
End of period
  $ 10,486     $ 42,032  
Beginning of period
    59,213       10,909  
 
           
(Decrease) increase
  $ (48,727 )   $ 31,123  
 
           
     
(1)  
As adjusted in accordance with the transition provisions for accounting for noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries (Note 3).
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

- 3 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except unit data)
                                                         
                            Accumulated     Total                
                            other     AmeriGas             Total  
    Number of     Common     General     comprehensive     Partners, L.P.     Noncontrolling     partners’  
    Common Units     unitholders     partner     income (loss)     partners’ capital     interests     capital  
 
                               
For the three months ended December 31, 2009:
                                                       
Balance September 30, 2009
    57,046,388     $ 367,708     $ 3,698     $ (6,947 )   $ 364,459     $ 11,866     $ 376,325  
Net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners, L.P
            82,552       1,407               83,959       995       84,954  
Net gains on derivative instruments
                            44,188       44,188       448       44,636  
Reclassification of net gains on derivative instruments
                            (8,442 )     (8,442 )     (87 )     (8,529 )
 
                                           
Comprehensive income
            82,552       1,407       35,746       119,705       1,356       121,061  
Distributions
            (38,227 )     (959 )             (39,186 )     (687 )     (39,873 )
Unit-based compensation expense
            128                     128             128  
Common Units issued in connection with incentive compensation plans, net of tax withheld
    8,500       310       3               313               313  
 
                                         
Balance December 31, 2009
    57,054,888     $ 412,471     $ 4,149     $ 28,799     $ 445,419     $ 12,535     $ 457,954  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
For the three months ended December 31, 2008 (1):
                                                       
Balance September 30, 2008
    57,009,951     $ 308,186     $ 3,094     $ (63,905 )   $ 247,375     $ 10,723     $ 258,098  
Net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners, L.P
            122,418       1,545               123,963       1,441       125,404  
Net losses on derivative instruments
                            (179,913 )     (179,913 )     (1,835 )     (181,748 )
Reclassification of net losses on derivative instruments
                            55,337       55,337       563       55,900  
 
                                           
Comprehensive loss
            122,418       1,545       (124,576 )     (613 )     169       (444 )
Distributions
            (36,489 )     (677 )             (37,166 )     (667 )     (37,833 )
Unit-based compensation expense
            117                     117             117  
Common Units issued in connection with incentive compensation plans, net of tax withheld
    4,000       118       1               119               119  
 
                                         
Balance December 31, 2008
    57,013,951     $ 394,350     $ 3,963     $ (188,481 )   $ 209,832     $ 10,225     $ 220,057  
 
                                         
     
(1)  
As adjusted in accordance with the transition provisions for accounting for noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries (Note 3).
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

- 4 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except per unit)
1.  
Nature of Operations
 
   
AmeriGas Partners, L.P. (“AmeriGas Partners”) is a publicly traded limited partnership that conducts a national propane distribution business through its principal operating subsidiaries AmeriGas Propane, L.P. (“AmeriGas OLP”) and AmeriGas OLP’s subsidiary, AmeriGas Eagle Propane, L.P. (“Eagle OLP”). AmeriGas Partners, AmeriGas OLP and Eagle OLP are Delaware limited partnerships. AmeriGas OLP and Eagle OLP are collectively referred to herein as “the Operating Partnerships,” and AmeriGas Partners, the Operating Partnerships and all of their subsidiaries are collectively referred to herein as “the Partnership” or “we.”
 
   
The Operating Partnerships are engaged in the distribution of propane and related equipment and supplies. The Operating Partnerships comprise the largest retail propane distribution business in the United States serving residential, commercial, industrial, motor fuel and agricultural customers from locations in 50 states.
 
   
At December 31, 2009, AmeriGas Propane, Inc. (the “General Partner”), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of UGI Corporation (“UGI”), held a 1% general partner interest in AmeriGas Partners and a 1.01% general partner interest in AmeriGas OLP. The General Partner and its wholly owned subsidiary Petrolane Incorporated (“Petrolane,” a predecessor company of the Partnership) also owned 24,691,209 Common Units of AmeriGas Partners. The remaining 32,363,679 Common Units are publicly held. The Common Units represent limited partner interests in AmeriGas Partners.
 
   
AmeriGas Partners holds a 99% limited partner interest in AmeriGas OLP. AmeriGas OLP, indirectly through subsidiaries, owns an effective 0.1% general partner interest and a direct 99.9% limited partner interest in Eagle OLP.
 
   
AmeriGas Partners and the Operating Partnerships have no employees. Employees of the General Partner conduct, direct and manage our operations. The General Partner provides management and administrative services to AmeriGas Eagle Holdings, Inc. (“AEH”), the general partner of Eagle OLP, under a management services agreement. The General Partner is reimbursed monthly for all direct and indirect expenses it incurs on our behalf (see Note 5).
2.  
Significant Accounting Policies
   
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of AmeriGas Partners and its majority owned subsidiaries principally comprising AmeriGas OLP and Eagle OLP. We eliminate all significant intercompany accounts and transactions when we consolidate. We account for the General Partner’s 1.01% interest in AmeriGas OLP and an unrelated third party’s approximate 0.1% limited partner interest in Eagle OLP (prior to its redemption in July 2009) as noncontrolling interests in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
   
AmeriGas Finance Corp., AmeriGas Eagle Finance Corp. and AP Eagle Finance Corp. are wholly owned finance subsidiaries of AmeriGas Partners. Their sole purpose is to serve as co-obligors for debt securities issued by AmeriGas Partners.

 

- 5 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except per unit)
   
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). They include all adjustments which we consider necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Such adjustments consisted only of normal recurring items unless otherwise disclosed. The September 30, 2009 condensed consolidated balance sheet data were derived from audited financial statements, but do not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009. Weather significantly impacts demand for propane and profitability because many customers use propane for heating purposes. Due to the seasonal nature of the Partnership’s propane business, the results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for a full year.
 
   
As discussed below, certain prior-period amounts have been adjusted to comply with recently adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) accounting guidance for the presentation of noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements.
 
   
Allocation of Net Income Attributable to AmeriGas Partners. Net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners, L.P for partners’ capital and statement of operations presentation purposes is allocated to the General Partner and the limited partners in accordance with their respective ownership percentages after giving effect to amounts distributed to the General Partner in excess of its 1% general partner interest in AmeriGas Partners based on its incentive distributions rights (“IDRs”) under the Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AmeriGas Partners (“Partnership Agreement”).
 
   
Net Income Per Unit. On October 1, 2009, we adopted new accounting guidance regarding the application of the two-class method for determining income per unit. This new guidance addresses the application of the two-class method for master limited partnerships (“MLPs”) when IDRs are present and entitle the holder of such rights to a portion of distributions from the MLP. The new guidance addresses how current period earnings of the MLP should be allocated to the general partner, limited partners and, when applicable, holders of IDRs.
 
   
The new guidance regarding the two-class method requires that income per limited partner unit be calculated as if all earnings for the period were distributed and requires a separate calculation for each quarter and year-to-date period. In periods when our net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners exceeds our Available Cash, as defined in the Partnership Agreement, and is above certain levels, the calculation according to the two-class method results in an increased allocation of undistributed earnings to the General Partner. In periods when our Available Cash in respect of the quarter or year-to-date periods exceeds our net income (loss) attributable to AmeriGas Partners, the calculation according to the two-class method results in an allocation of earnings to the General Partner greater than its relative ownership interest in the Partnership (or in the case of a net loss attributable to AmeriGas Partners, an allocation of such net loss to the Common Unitholders greater than their relative ownership interest in the Partnership). The new guidance requires retrospective application of the guidance to all periods presented. The retrospective impact of the new guidance did not impact the three months ended December 31, 2008.

 

- 6 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except per unit)
   
The following table sets forth the allocation of net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners to the limited partners in accordance with the two-class method and the terms of our Partnership Agreement:
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    December 31,  
    2009     2008  
Common Unitholders’ interest in net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners
  $ 65,408     $ 85,598  
 
               
Weighted average Common Units outstanding — basic (thousands)
    57,055       57,014  
Potentially dilutive Common Units (thousands)
    50       48  
 
           
Weighted average Common Units outstanding — diluted (thousands)
    57,105       57,062  
 
           
   
Theoretical distributions of net income in accordance with the two-class method for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 resulted in an increased allocation of net income to the General Partner in the computation of income per limited partner unit which had the effect of decreasing earnings per limited partner unit by $0.30 and $0.65, respectively.
 
   
Potentially dilutive Common Units included in the diluted limited partner units outstanding computation reflect the effects of restricted Common Unit awards granted under the General Partner’s incentive compensation plans.
 
   
Comprehensive Income. Other comprehensive income (loss) is principally the result of changes in the fair value of propane commodity derivative instruments and interest rate protection agreements qualifying as cash flow hedges, net of reclassifications of net gains and losses to net income.
 
   
Reclassifications. In addition to the previously mentioned prior-period adjustments resulting from the adoption of accounting guidance relating to the presentation of noncontrolling interests, we have reclassified certain other prior-period balances to conform to the current-period presentation.
 
   
Use of Estimates. We make estimates and assumptions when preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
 
   
Subsequent Events. Management has evaluated the impact of subsequent events through February 5, 2010, the date the financial statements were filed with the SEC, and the effects of such evaluation have been reflected in the financial statements and related disclosures.

 

- 7 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except per unit)
3.  
Accounting Changes
 
   
Adoption of New Accounting Standards
 
   
Noncontrolling Interests. Effective October 1, 2009, we adopted new guidance regarding the accounting for and presentation of noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements. The new guidance significantly changed the accounting and reporting relating to noncontrolling interests in a consolidated subsidiary. Noncontrolling interests are now classified within partners’ capital, a change from their prior classification between liabilities and partners’ capital. Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests are now included in net income and deducted from net income to determine net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners. In addition, changes in a parent’s ownership interest while retaining control are accounted for as equity transactions and any retained noncontrolling equity investments in a former subsidiary are initially measured at fair value. In accordance with the new guidance, prior periods have been adjusted to conform to the new presentation.
 
   
Earnings Per Unit. As previously mentioned, on October 1, 2009, we adopted new accounting guidance regarding the application of the two-class method for determining income per unit as it relates to MLPs. This new guidance addresses the application of the two-class method for MLPs when incentive distribution rights are present and entitle the holder of such rights to a portion of the distributions. See Net Income Per Unit above for additional information.
 
   
Business Combinations. On October 1, 2009, we adopted new guidance on the accounting for business combinations. The new guidance applies to all transactions or other events in which an entity obtains control of one or more businesses. The new guidance establishes, among other things, principles and requirements for how the acquirer (1) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; (2) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in a business combination or gain from a bargain purchase; and (3) determines what information with respect to a business combination should be disclosed. The new guidance applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the date of adoption. Among the more significant changes in accounting for acquisitions are (1) transaction costs will generally be expensed (rather than being included as costs of the acquisition); (2) contingencies, including contingent consideration, will generally be recorded at fair value with subsequent adjustments recognized in operations (rather than as adjustments to the purchase price); and (3) decreases in valuation allowances on acquired deferred tax assets will be recognized in operations (rather than decreases in goodwill). The new guidance did not have a material effect on the three months ended December 31, 2009.
 
   
Intangible Asset Useful Lives. On October 1, 2009, we adopted new accounting guidance which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under GAAP. The intent of the new guidance is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under GAAP relating to intangible asset accounting and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under GAAP relating to business combinations and other applicable accounting literature. The new guidance must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. The adoption of the new guidance did not impact our financial statements.

 

- 8 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except per unit)
4.  
Intangible Assets
 
   
The Partnership’s intangible assets comprise the following:
                         
    December 31,     September 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2009     2008  
Subject to amortization:
                       
Customer relationships and noncompete agreements
  $ 58,257     $ 56,581     $ 52,783  
Accumulated amortization
    (25,363 )     (23,970 )     (21,350 )
 
                 
 
  $ 32,894     $ 32,611     $ 31,433  
 
                 
Not subject to amortization:
                       
Goodwill
  $ 666,404     $ 665,663     $ 660,597  
 
                 
   
The increase in goodwill and other intangible assets during the three months ended December 31, 2009 principally reflects the effects of acquisitions. Amortization expense of intangible assets was $1,393 and $1,317 for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. No amortization is included in cost of sales in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Our expected aggregate amortization expense of intangible assets for the next five fiscal years is as follows: Fiscal 2010 — $5,456; Fiscal 2011 — $5,366; Fiscal 2012 — $5,297; Fiscal 2013 — $4,742; Fiscal 2014 — $3,789.
5.  
Related Party Transactions
   
Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement and a Management Services Agreement among AEH, the general partner of Eagle OLP, and the General Partner, the General Partner is entitled to reimbursement for all direct and indirect expenses incurred or payments it makes on behalf of the Partnership. These costs which totaled $90,495 and $90,750 for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, include employee compensation and benefit expenses of employees of the General Partner and general and administrative expenses.
 
   
UGI provides certain financial and administrative services to the General Partner. UGI bills the General Partner monthly for all direct and indirect corporate expenses incurred in connection with providing these services and the General Partner is reimbursed by the Partnership for these expenses. The allocation of indirect UGI corporate expenses to the Partnership utilizes a weighted, three-component formula based on the relative percentage of the Partnership’s revenues, operating expenses and net assets employed to the total of such items for UGI’s other operating subsidiaries for which general and administrative services are provided. The General Partner believes that this allocation method is reasonable and equitable to the Partnership. Such corporate expenses totaled $1,203 and $2,249 during the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In addition, UGI and certain of its subsidiaries provide office space, stop loss medical coverage and automobile liability insurance to the Partnership. These expenses, net of any recoveries, totaled $88 and $813 during the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

- 9 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except per unit)
   
AmeriGas OLP purchases propane from UGI Energy Services, Inc. and subsidiaries (“Energy Services”), which is owned by an affiliate of UGI, pursuant to a Product Sales Agreement whereby Energy Services has agreed to sell and AmeriGas OLP has agreed to purchase a specified amount of propane annually at a terminal located in Chesapeake, Virginia. The Product Sales Agreement took effect on May 1, 2005 and will continue until April 30, 2010. The price to be paid for product purchased under the agreement is determined annually using a contractual formula that takes into account published index prices and the locational value of deliveries at the terminal. Purchases of propane by AmeriGas OLP from Energy Services totaled $9,784 and $5,874 during the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Amounts due to Energy Services at December 31, 2009, September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 totaled $3,982, $1,451 and $1,081, respectively, which are included in accounts payable — related parties in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 
   
The Partnership also sells propane to other affiliates of UGI. Such amounts were not material during the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
6.  
Commitments and Contingencies
   
Environmental Matters
 
   
By letter dated March 6, 2008, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (“DEC”) notified AmeriGas OLP that DEC had placed property owned by the Partnership in Saranac Lake, New York on its Registry of Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites. A site characterization study performed by DEC disclosed contamination related to former manufactured gas plant (“MGP”) operations on the site. DEC has classified the site as a significant threat to public health or environment with further action required. The Partner has researched the history of the site and its ownership interest in the site. The Partnership has reviewed the preliminary site characterization study prepared by the DEC, the extent of the contamination, and the possible existence of other potentially responsible parties. The Partnership has communicated the results of its research to DEC and is awaiting a response before doing any additional investigation. Because of the preliminary nature of available environmental information, the ultimate amount of expected clean up costs cannot be reasonably estimated.
 
   
Other Matters
 
   
On May 27, 2009, the General Partner was named as a defendant in a purported class action lawsuit in the Superior Court of the State of California in which plaintiffs are challenging AmeriGas OLP’s weight disclosure with regard to its portable propane grill cylinders. The complaint purports to be brought on behalf of a class of all consumers in the state of California during the four years prior to the date of the California complaint, who exchanged an empty cylinder and were provided with what is alleged to be only a partially-filled cylinder. The plaintiffs seek restitution, injunctive relief, interest, costs, attorneys’ fees and other appropriate relief.

 

- 10 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except per unit)
   
Since that initial suit, various AmeriGas entities have been named in more than a dozen similar suits that have been filed in various courts throughout the United States. These complaints purport to be brought on behalf of nationwide classes, which are loosely defined as to include all purchasers of liquefied propane gas cylinders marketed or sold by AmeriGas OLP and another unaffiliated entity nationwide in 2008 and 2009. The complaints claim that defendants’ conduct constituted unfair and deceptive practices that injured consumers and violated the consumer protection statutes of at least thirty-seven states and the District of Columbia, thereby entitling the class to damages, restitution, disgorgement, injunctive relief, costs and attorneys fees. Some of the complaints also allege violation of state “slack filling” laws. Additionally the complaints allege that defendants were unjustly enriched by their conduct and they seek restitution of any unjust benefits received, punitive or treble damages, and pre-judgment and post-judgment interest. A motion to consolidate the purported class action lawsuits was heard by the Multidistrict Litigation Panel (“MDL Panel”) on September 24, 2009 in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. By Order, dated October 6, 2009, the MDL Panel transferred the pending cases to the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.
 
   
On or about October 21, 2009, the General Partner received a notice that the Offices of the District Attorneys of Santa Clara, Sonoma, Ventura, San Joaquin and Fresno Counties and the City Attorney of San Diego have commenced an investigation into AmeriGas OLP’s cylinder labeling and filling practices in California and issued an administrative subpoena seeking documents and information relating to those practices. We are cooperating with these California governmental investigations and we are vigorously defending the lawsuits.
 
   
Samuel and Brenda Swiger and their son (the “Swigers”) sustained personal injuries and property damage as a result of a fire that occurred when propane that leaked from an underground line ignited. In July 1998, the Swigers filed a class action lawsuit against AmeriGas Propane, L.P. (named incorrectly as “UGI/AmeriGas, Inc.”), in the Circuit Court of Monongalia County, West Virginia, in which they sought to recover an unspecified amount of compensatory and punitive damages and attorney’s fees, for themselves and on behalf of persons in West Virginia for whom the defendants had installed propane gas lines, resulting from the defendants’ alleged failure to install underground propane lines at depths required by applicable safety standards. In 2003, AmeriGas OLP settled the individual personal injury and property damage claims of the Swigers. In 2004, the court granted the plaintiffs’ motion to include customers acquired from Columbia Propane Corporation in August 2001 as additional potential class members and the plaintiffs amended their complaint to name additional parties pursuant to such ruling. Subsequently, in March 2005, AmeriGas OLP filed a crossclaim against Columbia Energy Group, former owner of Columbia Propane Corporation, seeking indemnification for conduct undertaken by Columbia Propane Corporation prior to AmeriGas OLP’s acquisition. Class counsel has indicated that the class is seeking compensatory damages in excess of $12,000 plus punitive damages, civil penalties and attorneys’ fees.
 
   
In 2005, the Swigers filed what purports to be a class action in the Circuit Court of Harrison County, West Virginia against UGI, an insurance subsidiary of UGI, certain officers of UGI and the General Partner, and their insurance carriers and insurance adjusters. In the Harrison County lawsuit, the Swigers are seeking compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of the putative class for violations of the West Virginia Insurance Unfair Trade Practice Act, negligence, intentional misconduct, and civil conspiracy. The Swigers have also requested that the Court rule that insurance coverage exists under the policies issued by the defendant insurance companies for damages sustained by the members of the class in the Monongalia County lawsuit. The Circuit Court of Harrison County has not certified the class in the Harrison County lawsuit at this time and, in October 2008, stayed that lawsuit pending resolution of the class action lawsuit in Monongalia County. We believe we have good defenses to the claims in both actions.

 

- 11 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except per unit)
   
We cannot predict with certainty the final results of any of the environmental or other pending claims or legal actions described above. However, it is reasonably possible that some of them could be resolved unfavorably to us and result in losses in excess of recorded amounts. We are unable to estimate any possible losses in excess of recorded amounts. Although we currently believe, after consultation with counsel, that damages or settlements, if any, recovered by the plaintiffs in such claims or actions will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, damages or settlements could be material to our operating results or cash flows in future periods depending on the nature and timing of future developments with respect to these matters and the amounts of future operating results and cash flows. In addition to the matters described above, there are other pending claims and legal actions arising in the normal course of our businesses. While the results of these other pending claims and legal actions cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe, after consultation with counsel, the final outcome of such other matters will not have a significant effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
7.  
Fair Value Measurement
 
   
The following table presents our financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, including both current and noncurrent portions, as of December 31, 2009 and 2008:
                                 
    Quoted Prices in                    
    Active Markets     Significant              
    for Identical     Other              
    Assets and     Observable     Unobservable        
    Liabilities     Inputs     Inputs        
    (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     Total  
Derivative financial instruments:
                               
December 31, 2009:
                               
Assets
  $     $ 43,864     $     $ 43,864  
Liabilities
  $     $ (15,633 )   $     $ (15,633 )
December 31, 2008:
                               
Assets
  $     $ 623     $     $ 623  
Liabilities
  $     $ (174,860 )   $     $ (174,860 )

 

- 12 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except per unit)
8.  
Disclosures About Derivative Instruments, Hedging Activities and Financial Instruments
 
   
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
 
   
The Partnership is exposed to certain market risks related to its ongoing business operations. Management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments, among other things, to manage these risks. The primary risks managed by derivative instruments are commodity price risk and interest rate risk. Although we use derivative financial and commodity instruments to reduce market risk associated with forecasted transactions, we do not use derivative financial and commodity instruments for speculative or trading purposes. The use of derivative instruments is controlled by our risk management and credit policies which govern, among other things, the derivative instruments the Partnership can use, counterparty credit limits and contract authorization limits. Because our derivative instruments generally qualify as hedges under GAAP, we expect that changes in the fair value of derivative instruments used to manage commodity or interest rate market risk would be substantially offset by gains or losses on the associated anticipated transactions.
 
   
Commodity Price Risk
 
   
In order to manage market risk associated with the Partnership’s fixed-price programs which permit customers to lock in the prices they pay for propane principally during the months of October through March, the Partnership uses over-the-counter derivative commodity instruments, principally price swap contracts. At December 31, 2009, there were 93.8 million gallons of propane hedged with over-the-counter price swap and option contracts. The maximum period over which we are currently hedging propane market price risk is 15 months with a weighted average of 3 months. We account for substantially all of our commodity price risk contracts as cash flow hedges. Changes in the fair values of contracts qualifying for cash flow hedge accounting are recorded in AOCI and noncontrolling interests, to the extent effective in offsetting changes in the underlying commodity price risk, until earnings are affected by the hedged item. At December 31, 2009, the amount of net gains associated with commodity price risk hedges expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months based upon current fair values is $40,615.
 
   
Interest Rate Risk
 
   
Our long-term debt is typically issued at fixed rates of interest. As these long-term debt issues mature, we typically refinance such debt with new debt having interest rates reflecting then-current market conditions. In order to reduce market rate risk on the underlying benchmark rate of interest associated with near- to medium-term forecasted issuances of fixed-rate debt, from time to time we may enter into interest rate protection agreements (“IRPAs”). At December 31, 2009, the total notional amount of the Partnership’s unsettled IRPAs was $150,000. Our current unsettled IRPA contracts hedge forecasted interest payments associated with the issuance of debt expected to occur in June 2010. We account for IRPAs as cash flow hedges. Changes in the fair values of IRPAs are recorded in AOCI and noncontrolling interests, to the extent effective in offsetting changes in the underlying interest rate risk, until earnings are affected by the hedged interest expense. At December 31, 2009, the amount of net losses associated with IRPAs expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months based upon current fair values is $1,048.

 

- 13 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except per unit)
   
Derivative Financial Instruments Credit Risk
 
   
The Partnership is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to derivative financial and commodity instruments. Our counterparties principally consist of major energy companies and major U.S. financial institutions. We maintain credit policies with regard to our counterparties that we believe reduce overall credit risk. These policies include evaluating and monitoring our counterparties’ financial condition, including their credit ratings, and entering into agreements with counterparties that govern credit limits. Certain of these agreements call for the posting of collateral by the counterparty or by the Partnership in the form of letters of credit, parental guarantees or cash. Although we have concentrations of credit risk associated with derivative financial instruments held by certain derivative financial instrument counterparties, the maximum amount of loss due to credit risk that, based upon the gross fair values of the derivative financial instruments, we would incur if these counterparties that make up the concentration failed to perform according to the terms of their contracts was not material at December 31, 2009. We generally do not have credit-risk-related contingent features in our derivative contracts.
 
   
The following table provides information regarding the balance sheet location and fair value of derivative assets and liabilities existing as of December 31, 2009:
                                 
    Derivative Assets     Derivative Liabilities  
    Balance Sheet     Fair     Balance Sheet     Fair  
As of December 31, 2009   Location     Value     Location     Value  
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments:
                               
Propane contracts
  Derivative financial instruments and Other assets     $ 38,366     Derivative financial instruments     $  
Interest rate contracts
  Derivative financial instruments       3,856     Derivative financial instruments       (14,049 )
 
                           
 
                               
Total Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
          $ 42,222             $ (14,049 )
 
                           
 
                               
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments:
                               
 
                               
Propane contracts
  Derivative financial instruments   $ 1,642     Derivative financial instruments   $ (1,584 )
 
                           
 
                               
Total Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
          $ 1,642             $ (1,584 )
 
                           
 
                               
Total Derivatives
          $ 43,864             $ (15,633 )
 
                           

 

- 14 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except per unit)
   
The following table provides information on the effects of derivative instruments on the consolidated statement of operations and changes in AOCI and noncontrolling interest for the three months ended December 31, 2009:
Three Months Ended December 31, 2009
                         
            Location of        
    Gain     Gain (Loss)     Gain (Loss)  
    Recognized in     Reclassified from     Reclassified from  
    AOCI and Noncontrolling     AOCI and Noncontrolling     AOCI and Noncontrolling  
    Interest     Interest into Income     Interest into Income  
 
               
Cash Flow
                       
Hedges:
                       
Propane contracts
  $ 38,947     Cost of sales   $ 8,664  
Interest rate contracts
    5,689     Interest expense /other income     (135 )
 
                   
Total
  $ 44,636             $ 8,529  
 
                   
   
The amounts of derivative gains or losses representing ineffectiveness and the amounts of gains or losses recognized in income as a result of excluding from ineffectiveness testing were not material. The amount of net gains or losses associated with propane contracts not designated as hedging instruments was not material during the three months ended December 31, 2009.
 
   
Financial Instruments
 
   
The carrying amounts of financial instruments included in current assets and current liabilities (excluding unsettled derivative instruments and current maturities of long-term debt) approximate their fair values because of their short-term nature. The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our remaining financial instrument assets and (liabilities) at December 31, 2009 (including unsettled derivative instruments) are as follows:
                 
    Asset (Liability)  
    Carrying     Estimated  
    Amount     Fair Value  
Derivative instruments
  $ 28,231     $ 28,231  
Long-term debt
  $ (866,851)     $ (867,392)  
   
We estimate the fair value of long-term debt by using current market prices and by discounting future cash flows using rates available for similar type debt.

 

- 15 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
ITEM 2.  
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Information contained in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations may contain forward-looking statements. Such statements use forward-looking words such as “believe,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “may,” “will,” or other similar words. These statements discuss plans, strategies, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future.
A forward-looking statement may include a statement of the assumptions or bases underlying the forward-looking statement. We believe that we have chosen these assumptions or bases in good faith and that they are reasonable. However, we caution you that actual results almost always vary from assumed facts or bases, and the differences between actual results and assumed facts or bases can be material, depending on the circumstances. When considering forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the following important factors which could affect our future results and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements: (1) adverse weather conditions resulting in reduced demand; (2) cost volatility and availability of propane, and the capacity to transport propane to our market areas; (3) the availability of, and our ability to consummate, acquisition or combination opportunities; (4) successful integration and future performance of acquired assets or businesses; (5) changes in laws and regulations, including safety, tax and accounting matters; (6) competitive pressures from the same and alternative energy sources; (7) failure to acquire new customers thereby reducing or limiting any increase in revenues; (8) liability for environmental claims; (9) increased customer conservation measures due to high energy prices and improvements in energy efficiency and technology resulting in reduced demand; (10) adverse labor relations; (11) large customer, counter-party or supplier defaults; (12) liability in excess of insurance coverage for personal injury and property damage arising from explosions and other catastrophic events, including acts of terrorism, resulting from operating hazards and risks incidental to transporting, storing and distributing propane, butane and ammonia; (13) political, regulatory and economic conditions in the United States and foreign countries; (14) capital market conditions, including, reduced access to capital markets and interest rate fluctuations; (15) changes in commodity market prices resulting in significantly higher cash collateral requirements; (16) the impact of pending and future legal proceedings; and (17) the timing and success of our acquisitions and investments to grow our business.
These factors are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. Other unknown or unpredictable factors could also have material adverse effects on future results. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statement whether as a result of new information or future events except as required by the federal securities laws.

 

- 16 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following analyses compare the Partnership’s results of operations for (1) the three months ended December 31, 2009 (“2009 three-month period”) with the three months ended December 31, 2008 (“2008 three-month period”).
Executive Overview
Net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners for the 2009 three-month period was $84.0 million compared with net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners for the 2008 three-month period of $124.0 million. The 2008 three-month period net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners includes a $39.5 million gain on the sale of our California storage facility in November 2008. LPG wholesale prices increased approximately 40% during the 2009 three-month period compared with wholesale propane prices that decreased more than 50% from the beginning to the end of the 2008 three-month period. Average temperatures in the Partnership’s service territories were slightly colder in the 2009 three-month period compared with the prior-year period. Notwithstanding the colder weather, retail volumes were 4% lower reflecting the continuing impact of the recession and customer conservation. Total margin declined in the 2009 three-month period primarily due to the lower retail volumes sold. The decline in total margin was substantially offset by lower operating and administrative expenses.
As further described in Note 3 to condensed consolidated financial statements, effective October 1, 2009, we adopted guidance regarding the accounting for and presentation of noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements. The new guidance changed the accounting and reporting relating to noncontrolling interests in a consolidated subsidiary. Noncontrolling interests are now classified as a component of partners’ capital on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, a change from its prior classification between liabilities and partners’ capital. Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests are now included in net income and deducted from net income to determine net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners. In accordance with the new guidance, prior-year periods have been adjusted. The new guidance had no effect on basic or diluted earnings per unit.

 

- 17 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
2009 three-month period compared with 2008 three-month period
                                 
                    Increase  
Three Months Ended December 31,   2009     2008     (Decrease)  
(millions of dollars)                                
 
                               
Gallons sold (millions):
                               
Retail
    267.4       278.2       (10.8 )     (3.9 )%
Wholesale
    44.6       41.4       3.2       7.7 %
 
                         
 
    312.0       319.6       (7.6 )     (2.4 )%
 
                         
Revenues:
                               
Retail propane
  $ 560.9     $ 634.9     $ (74.0 )     (11.7 )%
Wholesale propane
    53.5       43.7       9.8       22.4 %
Other
    42.2       48.5       (6.3 )     (13.0 )%
 
                         
 
  $ 656.6     $ 727.1     $ (70.5 )     (9.7 )%
 
                         
 
                               
Total margin (a)
  $ 267.0     $ 281.5     $ (14.5 )     (5.2 )%
EBITDA (b)
  $ 123.0     $ 164.1     $ (41.1 )     (25.0 )%
Operating income
  $ 102.6     $ 144.8     $ (42.2 )     (29.1 )%
Net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners
  $ 84.0     $ 124.0     $ (40.0 )     (32.3 )%
Heating degree days — % colder (warmer) than normal (c)
    1.3 %     (0.8 )%            
     
(a)  
Total margin represents total revenues less cost of sales — propane and cost of sales — other.
 
(b)  
Earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) should not be considered as an alternative to net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners (as an indicator of operating performance) and is not a measure of performance or financial condition under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Management believes EBITDA is a meaningful non-GAAP financial measure used by investors to (1) compare the Partnership’s operating performance with other companies within the propane industry and (2) assess its ability to meet loan covenants. The Partnership’s definition of EBITDA may be different from that used by other companies. Management uses EBITDA to compare year-over-year profitability of the business without regard to capital structure as well as to compare the relative performance of the Partnership to that of other master limited partnerships without regard to their financing methods, capital structure, income taxes or historical cost basis. In view of the omission of interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization from EBITDA, management also assesses the profitability of the business by comparing net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners for the relevant years. Management also uses EBITDA to assess the Partnership’s profitability because its parent, UGI Corporation, uses the Partnership’s EBITDA to assess the profitability of the Partnership. UGI Corporation discloses the Partnership’s EBITDA as the profitability measure to comply with the GAAP requirement to provide profitability information about its domestic propane segment. EBITDA in the three months ended December 31, 2008 includes a pre-tax gain of $39.9 million from the sale of a California LPG storage facility.

 

- 18 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
The following table includes reconciliations of net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners to EBITDA for the periods presented:
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    December 31,  
    2009     2008  
 
               
Net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners
  $ 84.0     $ 124.0  
Income tax expense
    1.1       0.7  
Interest expense
    16.5       18.7  
Depreciation
    20.0       19.4  
Amortization
    1.4       1.3  
 
           
EBITDA
  $ 123.0     $ 164.1  
 
           
     
(c)  
Deviation from average heating degree days for the 30-year period 1971-2000 based upon national weather statistics provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”) for 335 airports in the United States, excluding Alaska. Prior year data has been adjusted to correct a NOAA error.
Based upon heating degree-day data, average temperatures in our service territories were 1.3% colder than normal during the 2009 three-month period compared with temperatures in the prior-year period that were 0.8% warmer than normal. Notwithstanding the slightly colder 2009 three-month period weather, retail gallons sold were lower than in the prior-year period reflecting, among other things, the continuing adverse effects of the economic recession on commercial and motor fuel customers and continued customer conservation.
Retail propane revenues declined $74.0 million during the 2009 three-month period reflecting a $49.4 million decrease due to lower average selling prices and a $24.6 million decrease as a result of the lower retail volumes sold. Wholesale propane revenues increased $9.7 million principally reflecting higher year-over-year wholesale selling prices and higher wholesale volumes sold. Average wholesale propane commodity prices at Mont Belvieu, Texas, one of the major supply points in the U.S., were approximately 36% higher in the 2009 three-month period compared to such prices in the 2008 three-month period. The higher average wholesale propane commodity prices in the current year reflect the effects of an increase in wholesale propane commodity prices during the current-year period and a precipitous decline in such prices during the 2008 three-month period. At December 31, 2009, wholesale propane commodity prices at Mont Belvieu were $1.32 a gallon compared with $0.62 a gallon at December 31, 2008. Other non-propane revenues were lower in the 2009 three-month period due in large part to lower fee, hauling and terminal revenues. Total cost of sales decreased $55.9 million to $389.6 million principally reflecting the effects of the lower propane product costs and lower volume sales.
Total margin was $14.5 million lower in the 2009 three-month period primarily due to the lower retail volumes sold.
The $41.1 million decrease in EBITDA during the 2009 three-month period reflects the absence of a $39.9 million pre-tax gain recorded in the prior-year period associated with the November 2008 sale of the Partnership’s California LPG storage facility and the previously mentioned lower 2009 three-month period total margin. The reduction in total margin was substantially offset by lower operating and administrative expenses, principally lower uncollectible accounts expense and lower general insurance and uninsured litigation expenses.

 

- 19 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Operating income in the 2009 three-month period decreased $42.2 million reflecting the $41.1 million decrease in EBITDA, principally due to the previously mentioned absence of the gain from the sale of the Partnership’s California storage facility, and slightly higher depreciation and amortization expense associated with acquisitions and plant and equipment expenditures made since the prior year. Net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners decreased $40.0 million during the 2009 three-month period largely reflecting the decrease in operating income and higher income tax expense partially offset by lower interest expense on bank loan borrowings and lower interest on long-term debt. Bank loan borrowings were significantly greater in the prior-year three-month period as a result of the need to fund counterparty collateral deposits associated with derivative financial instruments used by the Partnership to manage market price risk associated with fixed sales price commitments.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Financial Condition
The Partnership’s debt outstanding at December 31, 2009 totaled $890.9 million (including current maturities of long-term debt of $82.7 million) compared with total debt outstanding of $865.6 million (including current maturities of long-term debt of $82.2 million) at September 30, 2009. Total debt outstanding at December 31, 2009 includes long-term debt comprising $779.7 million of AmeriGas Partners’ Senior Notes, $80.0 million of AmeriGas OLP First Mortgage Notes and $7.2 million of other long-term debt. At December 31, 2009, there was $24 million of borrowings outstanding under AmeriGas OLP’s credit agreements (as further described below). There were no such borrowings at September 30, 2009 and $146 million of credit agreement borrowings at December 31, 2008. The significantly higher credit agreement borrowings at December 31, 2008 reflect higher borrowings needed in the prior year to fund counterparty collateral deposits associated with derivative financial instruments used by the Partnership to manage market price risk associated with fixed sales price commitments.
AmeriGas OLP’s short-term borrowing needs are seasonal and are typically greatest during the fall and winter heating-season months due to the need to fund higher levels of working capital. In order to meet its short-term cash needs, AmeriGas OLP has a $200 million credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”) which expires on October 15, 2011. AmeriGas OLP also has a $75 million unsecured revolving credit facility (“2009 Supplemental Credit Agreement”) with three banks. AmeriGas OLP’s Credit Agreement consists of (1) a $125 million Revolving Credit Facility and (2) a $75 million Acquisition Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility may be used for working capital and general purposes of AmeriGas OLP. The Acquisition Facility provides AmeriGas OLP with the ability to borrow up to $75 million to finance the purchase of propane businesses or propane business assets or, to the extent it is not so used, for working capital and general purposes. The 2009 Supplemental Credit Agreement expires on July 1, 2010 and permits AmeriGas OLP to borrow up to $75 million for working capital and general purposes.

 

- 20 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
At December 31, 2009, there were $24 million of borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreements and no amounts outstanding under the 2009 Supplement Credit Agreement which are classified as bank loans on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Issued and outstanding letters of credit under the Revolving Credit Facility, which reduce the amount available for borrowings, totaled $36.1 million at December 31, 2009. The average daily and peak bank loan borrowings outstanding under the credit agreements during the 2009 three-month period were $13.2 million and $48.0 million, respectively. The average daily and peak bank loan borrowings outstanding under the credit agreements during the 2008 three-month period were $131.8 million and $184.5 million, respectively. As previously mentioned, the higher average and peak bank loan borrowings in the prior year three-month period resulted from the need to fund counterparty cash collateral obligations associated with derivative financial instruments used by the Partnership to manage price risk associated with fixed sales price commitments to customers. These collateral obligations resulted from the precipitous decline in propane commodity prices that occurred early in Fiscal 2009. At December 31, 2009, the Partnership’s available borrowing capacity under the credit agreements was $214.9 million.
AmeriGas Partners expects to issue $150 million of long-term debt during the summer of 2010. The proceeds from the issuance of such long-term debt is expected to be used to repay $80 million of maturing AmeriGas OLP Series E First Mortgage Notes and for general Partnership purposes.
Based on existing cash balances, cash expected to be generated from operations, borrowings available under AmeriGas OLP’s credit agreements and the previously mentioned issuance of AmeriGas Partners’ long-term debt, the Partnership’s management believes that the Partnership will be able to meet its anticipated contractual commitments and projected cash needs during Fiscal 2010.
During the three months ended December 31, 2009, the Partnership declared and paid quarterly distributions on all limited partner units at a rate of $0.67 per Common Unit for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. The quarterly distribution of $0.67 per limited partner unit for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 will be paid on February 18, 2010 to holders of record on February 10, 2010. The ability of the Partnership to declare and pay the quarterly distribution on its Common Units in the future depends upon a number of factors. These factors include (1) the level of Partnership earnings; (2) the cash needs of the Partnership’s operations (including cash needed for maintaining and increasing operating capacity); (3) changes in operating working capital; and (4) the Partnership’s ability to borrow under its credit agreements, refinance maturing debt, and increase its long-term debt. Some of these factors are affected by conditions beyond the Partnership’s control including weather, competition in markets we serve, the cost of propane and changes in capital market conditions.
Cash Flows
Operating activities. Due to the seasonal nature of the Partnership’s business, cash flows from operating activities are generally strongest during the second and third fiscal quarters when customers pay for propane consumed during the heating season months. Conversely, operating cash flows are generally at their lowest levels during the first and fourth fiscal quarters when the Partnership’s investment in working capital, principally accounts receivable and inventories, is generally greatest. The Partnership may use its credit agreements to satisfy its seasonal operating cash flow needs.

 

- 21 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Cash flow used by operating activities was $3.4 million in the 2009 three-month period compared to $68.0 million in the 2008 three-month period. Cash flow from operating activities before changes in operating working capital was $113.3 million in the 2009 three-month period compared with $101.9 million in the prior-year period principally reflects the amount and timing of recognition of gains (losses) on settled derivative commodity contracts. Cash required to fund changes in operating working capital totaled $116.7 million in the 2009 three-month period compared with $169.9 million in the prior-year period. The decrease in cash required to fund operating working capital in the current-year period principally reflects the absence of $114.0 million of cash required to fund counterparty collateral requirements in the prior-year period and the timing and amount of cash payments for purchases of propane partially offset by greater cash required to fund accounts receivable and inventories.
Investing activities. Investing activity cash flow is principally affected by investments in property, plant and equipment, cash paid for acquisitions of businesses and proceeds from sales of assets. Cash flow used in investing activities was $29.5 million in the 2009 three-month period compared with $8.9 million in the prior-year period. We spent $26.7 million for property, plant and equipment (comprising $10.4 million of maintenance capital expenditures and $16.3 million of growth capital expenditures) in the 2009 three-month period compared with $19.1 million (comprising $8.6 million of maintenance capital expenditures and $10.5 million of growth capital expenditures) in the 2008 three-month period. The greater capital expenditures in the 2009 three-month period include expenditures associated with an ongoing system software replacement and accelerated opportunistic purchases of cylinders for our AmeriGas Cylinder Exchange program. In November 2008, the Partnership sold its California LPG storage facility for net cash proceeds of $42.4 million.
Financing activities. The Partnership’s financing activities cash flows are typically the result of repayments and issuances of long-term debt, borrowings under AmeriGas OLP’s credit agreements, issuances of Common Units and distributions on partnership interests. Cash used by financing activities was $15.8 million in the 2009 three-month period compared with cash provided by financing activities of $108.0 million in the prior-year period. Distributions in the 2009 three-month period totaled $39.2 million compared with $37.2 million in the prior-year period principally reflecting a higher quarterly per-unit distribution rate. There were $24 million of borrowings under the credit agreements during the 2009 three-month period compared to $146 million during the 2008 three-month period. The higher amount of borrowings in the prior-year period reflects in large part greater borrowings to fund counterparty collateral deposits.
ITEM 3.  
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our primary financial market risks include commodity prices for propane and interest rates on borrowings.
Commodity Price Risk
The risk associated with fluctuations in the prices the Partnership pays for propane is principally a result of market forces reflecting changes in supply and demand for propane and other energy commodities. The Partnership’s profitability is sensitive to changes in propane supply costs and the Partnership generally passes on increases in such costs to customers. The Partnership may not, however, always be able to pass through product cost increases fully or on a timely basis, particularly when product costs rise rapidly. In order to reduce the volatility of the Partnership’s propane market price risk, we use contracts for the forward purchase or sale of propane, propane fixed-price supply agreements, and over-the-counter derivative commodity instruments including price swap and option contracts. Over-the-counter derivative commodity instruments utilized by the Partnership to hedge forecasted purchases of propane are generally settled at expiration of the contract. These derivative financial instruments contain collateral provisions. In order to minimize our credit risk associated with derivative commodity contracts, we monitor established credit limits with our contract counterparties. Although we use derivative financial and commodity instruments to reduce market price risk associated with forecasted transactions, we do not use derivative financial and commodity instruments for speculative or trading purposes.

 

- 22 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Interest Rate Risk
The Partnership has both fixed-rate and variable-rate debt. Changes in interest rates impact the cash flows of variable-rate debt but generally do not impact their fair value. Conversely, changes in interest rates impact the fair value of fixed-rate debt but do not impact their cash flows.
Our variable-rate debt includes borrowings under AmeriGas OLP’s credit agreements. These agreements have interest rates that are generally indexed to short-term market interest rates. The remainder of our debt outstanding is subject to fixed rates of interest. Our long-term debt is typically issued at fixed rates of interest based upon market rates for debt having similar terms and credit ratings. As these long-term debt issues mature, we may refinance such debt with new debt having interest rates reflecting then-current market conditions. This debt may have an interest rate that is more or less than the refinanced debt. In order to reduce interest rate risk associated with forecasted issuances of fixed-rate debt, from time to time we enter into interest rate protection agreements.
The following table summarizes the fair values of unsettled market risk sensitive derivative instruments held at December 31, 2009. It also includes the changes in fair value that would result if there were a ten percent adverse change in (1) the market price of propane and (2) the three-month LIBOR:
                 
    Fair Value -        
    Asset     Change in  
(Millions of dollars)   (Liability)     Fair Value  
December 31, 2009:
               
Propane swap and option contracts
  $ 38.4     $ (12.1 )
Interest rate protection agreements
  $ (10.2 )   $ (5.3 )
Because the Partnership’s derivative instruments generally qualify as hedges under GAAP, we expect that changes in the fair value of derivative instruments used to manage propane price or interest rate risk would be substantially offset by gains or losses on the associated anticipated transactions.

 

- 23 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
ITEM 4.  
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a)  
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
   
The Partnership’s management, with the participation of the Partnership’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were designed and functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Partnership in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.
(b)  
Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
   
No change in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

- 24 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A.  
RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information presented in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Partnership. Other unknown or unpredictable factors could also have material adverse effects on future results.
ITEM 6.  
EXHIBITS
The exhibits filed as part of this report are as follows (exhibits incorporated by reference are set forth with the name of the registrant, the type of report and last date of the period for which it was filed, and the exhibit number in such filing):
Incorporation by Reference
                         
Exhibit                
No.   Exhibit   Registrant   Filing   Exhibit
  10.1    
AmeriGas Propane, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan as Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009
               
       
 
               
  10.2    
Amendment 2009-1 to the UGI Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and Supplemental Savings Plan as Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2009
  UGI   Form 10-Q (12/31/09)     10.1  
       
 
               
  10.3    
UGI Corporation 2009 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan For New Employees
  UGI   Form 10-Q (12/31/09)     10.2  
       
 
               
  31.1    
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer relating to the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
               
       
 
               
  31.2    
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer relating to the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
               
       
 
               
  32    
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer relating to the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
               

 

- 25 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  AmeriGas Partners, L.P.
(Registrant)
 
 
  By:   AmeriGas Propane, Inc.,    
    as General Partner   
     
Date: February 5, 2010  By:   /s/ Jerry E. Sheridan    
    Jerry E. Sheridan   
    Vice President — Finance and
Chief Financial Officer 
 
     
Date: February 5, 2010  By:   /s/ William J. Stanczak    
    William J. Stanczak   
    Controller and Chief Accounting Officer   

 

- 26 -


Table of Contents

AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
EXHIBIT INDEX
         
10.1      
AmeriGas Propane, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan as Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009.
       
 
31.1      
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer relating to the Registrant’s Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
31.2      
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer relating to the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
32      
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer relating to the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.