Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-32 - EX-32 - QLOGIC CORP | a55023exv32.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - QLOGIC CORP | a55023exv31w2.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - QLOGIC CORP | a55023exv31w1.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended December 27, 2009
Or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-23298
QLogic Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 33-0537669 | |
(State of incorporation) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
26650 Aliso Viejo Parkway
Aliso Viejo, California 92656
(Address of principal executive office and zip code)
(Address of principal executive office and zip code)
(949) 389-6000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of January 28, 2010, 113,905,000 shares of the Registrants common stock were outstanding.
Table of Contents
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
QLOGIC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 27, | March 29, | |||||||
2009 | 2009 | |||||||
(Unaudited; In thousands, | ||||||||
except share and per | ||||||||
share amounts) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 145,142 | $ | 203,722 | ||||
Short-term investment securities |
204,059 | 139,561 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,873 and $1,366 as of December
27, 2009 and March 29, 2009, respectively |
86,101 | 68,519 | ||||||
Inventories |
21,820 | 40,293 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
17,827 | 19,002 | ||||||
Other current assets |
13,892 | 10,854 | ||||||
Total current assets |
488,841 | 481,951 | ||||||
Long-term investment securities |
| 34,986 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
86,060 | 92,547 | ||||||
Goodwill |
119,748 | 118,859 | ||||||
Purchased intangible assets, net |
18,786 | 19,117 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
33,402 | 28,785 | ||||||
Other assets |
3,813 | 4,045 | ||||||
$ | 750,650 | $ | 780,290 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 35,459 | $ | 36,874 | ||||
Accrued compensation |
19,199 | 28,702 | ||||||
Accrued taxes |
3,586 | 13,499 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
9,177 | 7,470 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
5,821 | 6,728 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
73,242 | 93,273 | ||||||
Accrued taxes |
41,882 | 47,116 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
8,147 | 8,559 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
4,865 | 4,797 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
128,136 | 153,745 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 203,874,000 and 202,009,000
shares issued at December 27, 2009 and March 29, 2009, respectively |
204 | 202 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
756,401 | 712,064 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
1,253,501 | 1,193,727 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
1,163 | 634 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost; 89,523,000 and 82,478,000 shares at December 27, 2009 and March 29,
2009, respectively |
(1,388,755 | ) | (1,280,082 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
622,514 | 626,545 | ||||||
$ | 750,650 | $ | 780,290 | |||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
QLOGIC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 27, | December 28, | December 27, | December 28, | |||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited; In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenues |
$ | 149,122 | $ | 163,691 | $ | 403,354 | $ | 503,315 | ||||||||
Cost of revenues |
53,020 | 54,770 | 145,258 | 165,542 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
96,102 | 108,921 | 258,096 | 337,773 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Engineering and development |
33,978 | 33,117 | 102,294 | 100,565 | ||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
18,812 | 20,918 | 58,268 | 67,895 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
8,780 | 8,172 | 24,923 | 24,892 | ||||||||||||
Special charges |
| 1,407 | 848 | 1,407 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
61,570 | 63,614 | 186,333 | 194,759 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
34,532 | 45,307 | 71,763 | 143,014 | ||||||||||||
Interest and other income, net |
1,736 | 2,511 | 6,996 | 2,035 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
36,268 | 47,818 | 78,759 | 145,049 | ||||||||||||
Income taxes |
7,620 | 17,028 | 18,985 | 55,457 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 28,648 | $ | 30,790 | $ | 59,774 | $ | 89,592 | ||||||||
Net income per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.25 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.69 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.25 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.68 | ||||||||
Number of shares used in per share calculations: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
114,695 | 126,180 | 116,935 | 130,050 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
116,479 | 126,497 | 117,965 | 130,932 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
QLOGIC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
December 27, | December 28, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(Unaudited; In thousands) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 59,774 | $ | 89,592 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
23,912 | 24,579 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
27,022 | 22,144 | ||||||
Acquisition-related: |
||||||||
Amortization of purchased intangible assets |
6,719 | 12,319 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
403 | 787 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
4,554 | 15,632 | ||||||
Net gains on investment securities |
(2,639 | ) | (4,469 | ) | ||||
Impairment of investment securities |
| 12,002 | ||||||
Provision for losses on accounts receivable |
512 | 111 | ||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment |
657 | 137 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(17,378 | ) | (6,000 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
19,503 | (2,651 | ) | |||||
Other assets |
148 | (2,149 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable |
(2,446 | ) | (2,073 | ) | ||||
Accrued compensation |
(9,505 | ) | (5,376 | ) | ||||
Accrued taxes |
(19,359 | ) | 6,725 | |||||
Deferred revenue |
1,295 | 1,821 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
(695 | ) | (702 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
92,477 | 162,429 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
(213,704 | ) | (60,266 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities |
175,513 | 102,198 | ||||||
Proceeds from disposition of trading securities |
10,525 | 2,675 | ||||||
Reclassification of cash equivalents to other investment securities |
| (57,209 | ) | |||||
Distributions from other investment securities |
3,076 | 6,540 | ||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(17,605 | ) | (21,410 | ) | ||||
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired |
(14,931 | ) | | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(57,126 | ) | (27,472 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of stock under stock plans |
18,966 | 23,605 | ||||||
Minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees for restricted stock units |
(2,833 | ) | (1,981 | ) | ||||
Tax effect from issuance of stock under stock plans |
(154 | ) | 323 | |||||
Purchases of treasury stock |
(108,976 | ) | (165,232 | ) | ||||
Payoff of line of credit assumed in acquisition |
(934 | ) | | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(93,931 | ) | (143,285 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(58,580 | ) | (8,328 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
203,722 | 160,009 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 145,142 | $ | 151,681 | ||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
QLOGIC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
In the opinion of management of QLogic Corporation (QLogic or the Company), the accompanying
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all normal recurring accruals and
adjustments necessary to present fairly the Companys consolidated financial position, results of
operations and cash flows. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be
read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2009. The results of operations for the
three and nine months ended December 27, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that
may be expected for the entire fiscal year. The Company has evaluated subsequent events through
February 2, 2010, the date the financial statements were issued. The preparation of financial
statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates that affect the amounts reported in the Companys
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Among the significant estimates
affecting the consolidated financial statements are those related to revenue recognition,
stock-based compensation, income taxes, investment securities, inventories, goodwill and long-lived
assets.
The Company evaluates its estimates on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other
factors, including the current economic environment. The current volatility in the capital markets
and the economy has increased the uncertainty in the Companys estimates, including estimates
impacting investment securities and long-lived assets. Significant judgment is required in
determining the fair value of investment securities in inactive markets, as well as determining
when declines in fair value constitute an other-than-temporary impairment. In addition,
significant judgment is required in determining whether a potential indicator of impairment of the
Companys long-lived assets exists and in estimating future cash flows for any necessary impairment
tests. Significant judgment is also required in determining the fair value of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination, including the fair value of identifiable intangible
assets. As future events unfold and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual
results could differ significantly from managements estimates.
Note 2. Business Combination
On April 27, 2009, the Company acquired NetXen, Inc. (NetXen) in a merger transaction. Cash
consideration was $17.6 million for all outstanding NetXen capital stock. NetXen developed,
marketed and sold Ethernet adapter and controller products targeted at the enterprise server
market. The acquisition expanded the Companys product portfolio to include Ethernet networking
products that are complementary to existing products. The acquisition also expanded the Companys
expertise to better address a wider range of emerging customer requirements for converged networks.
The acquisition agreement provided for an adjustment to the purchase price based on the final
working capital as of the date of acquisition. The Company finalized the working capital adjustment
in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and paid an additional $0.4 million. The acquisition
agreement also required that $5.1 million of the consideration be placed into an escrow account in
connection with certain representations and warranties. The consideration placed in escrow is
scheduled to be released between 18 and 24 months after the date of the acquisition. The escrowed
amounts have been accounted for as cash consideration as of the date of the acquisition.
The consideration paid in excess of the fair value of the net assets acquired totaled $0.9
million, which has been recorded as goodwill in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of December 27, 2009. None of the goodwill resulting from the acquisition will be tax
deductible.
4
Table of Contents
QLOGIC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
(In thousands) | ||||
Cash |
$ | 2,659 | ||
Accounts receivable |
716 | |||
Inventories |
1,030 | |||
Property and equipment |
854 | |||
Goodwill |
889 | |||
Identifiable intangible assets |
6,410 | |||
Deferred tax assets |
8,302 | |||
Other assets |
352 | |||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
(1,751 | ) | ||
Accrued compensation |
(937 | ) | ||
Line of credit |
(934 | ) | ||
$ | 17,590 | |||
A summary of the purchased intangible assets acquired as part of the acquisition of NetXen and
their respective estimated useful lives are as follows:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Useful Lives | ||||||||
(Years) | Amount | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Intangible Assets: |
||||||||
Core technology |
7 | $ | 5,400 | |||||
Contractual licenses |
5 | 1,010 | ||||||
$ | 6,410 | |||||||
The results of operations for NetXen have been included in the condensed consolidated
financial statements from the date of acquisition. Pro forma results of operations have not been
presented as the results of operations for NetXen are not material in relation to the condensed
consolidated financial statements of the Company.
Note 3. Investment Securities
Components of investment securities are as follows:
December 27, | March 29, | |||||||
2009 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Available-for-sale securities |
$ | 179,102 | $ | 136,027 | ||||
Trading securities |
24,396 | 34,891 | ||||||
Other investment securities |
561 | 3,629 | ||||||
Total investment securities |
204,059 | 174,547 | ||||||
Less long-term investment securities |
| 34,986 | ||||||
Short-term investment securities |
$ | 204,059 | $ | 139,561 | ||||
5
Table of Contents
QLOGIC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Available-For-Sale Securities
The Companys portfolio of available-for-sale securities consists of the following:
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
December 27, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government and agency securities |
$ | 43,130 | $ | 315 | $ | (22 | ) | $ | 43,423 | |||||||
Corporate debt obligations |
76,629 | 1,471 | (40 | ) | 78,060 | |||||||||||
Asset and mortgage-backed securities |
20,573 | 472 | (9 | ) | 21,036 | |||||||||||
Municipal bonds |
5,707 | 1 | | 5,708 | ||||||||||||
Other governmental securities |
750 | | (3 | ) | 747 | |||||||||||
Total debt securities |
146,789 | 2,259 | (74 | ) | 148,974 | |||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
30,128 | | | 30,128 | ||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale securities |
$ | 176,917 | $ | 2,259 | $ | (74 | ) | $ | 179,102 | |||||||
March 29, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government and agency securities |
$ | 51,776 | $ | 868 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 52,640 | |||||||
Corporate debt obligations |
39,434 | 390 | (190 | ) | 39,634 | |||||||||||
Asset and mortgage-backed securities |
20,691 | 418 | (96 | ) | 21,013 | |||||||||||
Municipal bonds |
2,530 | 61 | | 2,591 | ||||||||||||
Total debt securities |
114,431 | 1,737 | (290 | ) | 115,878 | |||||||||||
Certificate of deposit |
20,054 | | | 20,054 | ||||||||||||
Auction rate preferred securities |
100 | | (5 | ) | 95 | |||||||||||
Total available-for-sale securities |
$ | 134,585 | $ | 1,737 | $ | (295 | ) | $ | 136,027 | |||||||
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities as of December 27, 2009, by
contractual maturity, are presented below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual
maturities because the issuers of securities may have the right to repay obligations without
prepayment penalties. Certain debt instruments, although possessing a contractual maturity greater
than one year, are classified as short-term investment securities based on their ability to be
traded on active markets and availability for current operations.
Amortized | Estimated | |||||||
Cost | Fair Value | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 8,927 | $ | 9,090 | ||||
Due after one year through three years |
93,941 | 95,254 | ||||||
Due after three years through five years |
19,047 | 19,302 | ||||||
Due after five years |
24,874 | 25,328 | ||||||
$ | 146,789 | $ | 148,974 | |||||
As of December 27, 2009 and December 28, 2008, the fair value of certain of the Companys
available-for-sale securities was less than their cost basis. Management reviewed various factors
in determining whether to recognize an impairment charge related to these unrealized losses,
including the current financial and credit market environment, the financial condition and
near-term prospects of the issuer of the investment security, the magnitude of the unrealized loss
compared to the cost of the investment, the length of time the investment had been in a loss
position and the Companys intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery of market value. As of December 27, 2009, the
Company determined that the unrealized losses are temporary in nature and recorded them as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Based on this analysis, the Company
determined that a portion of the unrealized losses associated with the Companys portfolio of
available-for-sale securities were other-than-temporary and recorded impairment charges of $4.3
million and $10.3 million, which are included in interest and other income, net, in the
accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended
December 28, 2008, respectively.
6
Table of Contents
QLOGIC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents the Companys investments with unrealized losses by investment
category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position at December 27, 2009 and March 29, 2009.
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Description of Securities | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 27, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government and agency securities |
$ | 3,597 | $ | (22 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 3,597 | $ | (22 | ) | ||||||||||
Corporate debt obligations |
11,469 | (40 | ) | | | 11,469 | (40 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Asset and mortgage-backed securities |
3,318 | (9 | ) | | | 3,318 | (9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other governmental securities |
747 | (3 | ) | | | 747 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 19,131 | $ | (74 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 19,131 | $ | (74 | ) | ||||||||||
March 29, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government and agency securities |
$ | 2,002 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,002 | $ | (4 | ) | ||||||||||
Corporate debt obligations |
10,605 | (190 | ) | | | 10,605 | (190 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Asset and mortgage-backed securities |
2,842 | (96 | ) | | | 2,842 | (96 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Auction rate preferred securities |
95 | (5 | ) | | | 95 | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 15,544 | $ | (295 | ) | $ | | $ | | 15,544 | $ | (295 | ) | |||||||||||
The accompanying condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine months ended
December 28, 2008 has been adjusted to reflect net gains from the sale of available-for-sale
securities as an investing activity. This adjustment resulted in a $0.9 million decrease in cash
flow from operating activities and a corresponding increase in cash flow from investing activities.
The Company has evaluated the materiality of this adjustment from a qualitative and quantitative
perspective and concluded it is not material.
Trading Securities
The Companys portfolio of trading securities consists of the following:
December 27, | March 29, | |||||||
2009 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Auction rate debt securities |
$ | 17,081 | $ | 20,741 | ||||
Auction rate preferred securities |
4,334 | 4,869 | ||||||
Put options related to auction rate securities |
2,981 | 9,281 | ||||||
Total trading securities |
$ | 24,396 | $ | 34,891 | ||||
The Companys trading securities include investments in auction rate securities (ARS), the
majority of which are rated AA or higher. During late fiscal 2008, the market auctions of many ARS
began to fail, including auctions for the Companys ARS. The underlying assets for the auction
rate debt securities in the Companys portfolio are student loans, substantially all of which are
backed by the federal government under the Federal Family Education Loan Program. The underlying
assets of the Companys auction rate preferred securities are the respective funds investment
portfolios.
In November 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with the broker for all of the ARS
currently held by the Company, which provides the Company with certain rights (ARS Rights), in
exchange for the release of potential claims and damages against the broker. The ARS Rights
entitle the Company to sell the related ARS back to the broker for a price equal to the liquidation
preference of the ARS plus accrued but unpaid dividends or interest, if any, which price is
referred to as par. The ARS Rights may be exercised by the Company at any time between June 30,
2010 and July 2, 2012, if the securities are not earlier redeemed or sold. Under the ARS Rights,
the broker may, at its discretion, purchase the ARS at any time through July 2, 2012 without prior
notice to the Company and must pay the Company par value for the ARS within one day of the sale transaction
settlement.
The ARS Rights agreement, a legally enforceable contract, resulted in put options that were
recognized as free standing assets separate from the ARS. The Company elected to measure the put
options at fair value. In connection with the election to measure the put options at fair value,
the Company classified these financial instruments as trading securities and recorded the initial
fair value of $8.1 million in investment securities. The associated gains are recognized in
interest and other income, net, in the accompanying
7
Table of Contents
QLOGIC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2008. The ARS associated with the ARS Rights,
previously classified as available-for-sale securities, were reclassified to trading securities
during the three months ended December 28, 2008. As a result, the Company recognized a loss of
$3.4 million, which had previously been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and $1.1
million related to changes in the fair market value of the trading securities subsequent to the
reclassification. The loss related to the ARS is included in interest and other income, net, in
the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended
December 28, 2008.
As the ARS Rights may be exercised beginning June 30, 2010, the Company has classified its
auction rate debt and preferred securities, as well as the related put options, as short-term
investment securities as of December 27, 2009.
Other Investment Securities
The Companys other investment securities are comprised of a money market fund and an enhanced
cash fund sponsored by The Reserve (an asset management company), which suspended trading and
redemptions in September 2008. These funds are in the process of being liquidated and the Company
expects the liquidation to occur in stages with proceeds distributed as the underlying securities
mature or are sold. These funds do not have readily determinable fair values and thus have been
accounted for under the cost method.
During fiscal 2009, the Company reclassified $57.2 million of investments in the funds
sponsored by The Reserve from cash equivalents to short-term investments. This reclassification
has been presented separately as an investing activity in the accompanying condensed consolidated
statement of cash flows for the nine months ended December 28, 2008, to conform to the presentation
in the fiscal 2009 annual consolidated financial statements. The Company received net proceeds
from the partial liquidation of these funds totaling $3.1 million and $6.5 million for the nine
months ended December 27, 2009 and December 28, 2008, respectively, which are presented separately
as an investing activity in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. Also
during the nine months ended December 28, 2008, the Company recorded a $1.7 million impairment
charge related to these investments.
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to
transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation
techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the
use of unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is based on three levels of inputs, of which
the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair
value. A description of the three levels of inputs is as follows:
| Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. | ||
| Level 2 Inputs other than Level 1 inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. | ||
| Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
8
Table of Contents
QLOGIC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 27, 2009 and March 29, 2009
are as follows:
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
December 27, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government and agency securities |
$ | 43,423 | $ | | $ | | $ | 43,423 | ||||||||
Corporate debt obligations |
| 78,060 | | 78,060 | ||||||||||||
Asset and mortgage-backed securities |
| 21,036 | | 21,036 | ||||||||||||
Municipal bonds |
| 5,708 | | 5,708 | ||||||||||||
Other governmental securities |
| 747 | | 747 | ||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
30,128 | | | 30,128 | ||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale securities |
73,551 | 105,551 | | 179,102 | ||||||||||||
Auction rate debt securities |
| | 17,081 | 17,081 | ||||||||||||
Auction rate preferred securities |
| | 4,334 | 4,334 | ||||||||||||
Put options related to auction rate securities |
| | 2,981 | 2,981 | ||||||||||||
Total trading securities |
| | 24,396 | 24,396 | ||||||||||||
Balance as of December 27, 2009 |
$ | 73,551 | $ | 105,551 | $ | 24,396 | $ | 203,498 | ||||||||
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
March 29, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government and agency securities |
$ | 52,640 | $ | | $ | $ | 52,640 | |||||||||
Corporate debt obligations |
36,586 | 3,048 | | 39,634 | ||||||||||||
Asset and mortgage-backed securities |
3,621 | 17,392 | | 21,013 | ||||||||||||
Municipal bonds |
2,591 | | | 2,591 | ||||||||||||
Certificate of deposit |
20,054 | | | 20,054 | ||||||||||||
Auction rate preferred securities |
| | 95 | 95 | ||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale securities |
115,492 | 20,440 | 95 | 136,027 | ||||||||||||
Auction rate debt securities |
| | 20,741 | 20,741 | ||||||||||||
Auction rate preferred securities |
| | 4,869 | 4,869 | ||||||||||||
Put options related to auction rate securities |
| | 9,281 | 9,281 | ||||||||||||
Total trading securities |
| | 34,891 | 34,891 | ||||||||||||
Balance as of March 29, 2009 |
$ | 115,492 | $ | 20,440 | $ | 34,986 | $ | 170,918 | ||||||||
The Companys investments in auction rate securities and the related put options are
classified within Level 3 because there are currently no active markets for these securities and
the Company is unable to obtain independent valuations from market sources. Therefore, the auction
rate securities and the related put options were primarily valued based on an income approach using
estimates of future cash flows. The assumptions used in preparing these discounted cash flow
models included estimates for the amount and timing of future interest and principal payments, the
collateralization of underlying security investments, the creditworthiness of the issuer and the
rate of return required by investors to own these securities in the current environment, including
call and liquidity premiums. The total amount of assets measured using Level 3 valuation
methodologies represented 3% of total assets as of December 27, 2009.
A summary of the changes in Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the
three and nine months ended December 27, 2009 is as follows:
Balance | Total Realized | Total Unrealized | Sales and Other | Balance | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended December 27, 2009 | September 27, 2009 | Gains and Losses | Gains and Losses | Settlements | December 27, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Auction rate debt securities |
$ | 18,574 | $ | 269 | $ | | $ | (1,762 | ) | $ | 17,081 | |||||||||
Auction rate preferred securities |
4,334 | | | | 4,334 | |||||||||||||||
Put options related to auction rate securities |
3,230 | (249 | ) | | | 2,981 | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 26,138 | $ | 20 | $ | | $ | (1,762 | ) | $ | 24,396 | |||||||||
9
Table of Contents
QLOGIC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Balance | Total Realized | Total Unrealized | Sales and Other | Balance | ||||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended December 27, 2009 | March 29, 2009 | Gains and Losses | Gains and Losses | Settlements | December 27, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Auction rate debt securities |
$ | 20,741 | $ | 644 | $ | | $ | (4,304 | ) | $ | 17,081 | |||||||||
Auction rate preferred securities |
4,964 | 5,802 | 5 | (6,437 | ) | 4,334 | ||||||||||||||
Put options related to auction rate securities |
9,281 | (6,300 | ) | | | 2,981 | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 34,986 | $ | 146 | $ | 5 | $ | (10,741 | ) | $ | 24,396 | |||||||||
Realized gains and losses are included in interest and other income, net, in the accompanying
condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended December 27, 2009.
Note 4. Inventories
Components of inventories are as follows:
December 27, | March 29, | |||||||
2009 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 8,401 | $ | 15,780 | ||||
Finished goods |
13,419 | 24,513 | ||||||
$ | 21,820 | $ | 40,293 | |||||
Note 5. Purchased Intangible Assets
Purchased intangible assets consist of the following:
December 27, 2009 | March 29, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Net | Gross | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Amortization | Value | Value | Amortization | Value | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition-related intangibles: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Core/developed technology |
$ | 49,100 | $ | 31,897 | $ | 17,203 | $ | 43,700 | $ | 27,277 | $ | 16,423 | ||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
9,700 | 9,700 | | 9,700 | 7,814 | 1,886 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
1,785 | 910 | 875 | 775 | 697 | 78 | ||||||||||||||||||
60,585 | 42,507 | 18,078 | 54,175 | 35,788 | 18,387 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other purchased intangibles: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technology-related |
3,432 | 2,724 | 708 | 2,911 | 2,181 | 730 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 64,017 | $ | 45,231 | $ | 18,786 | $ | 57,086 | $ | 37,969 | $ | 19,117 | |||||||||||||
A summary of the amortization expense, by classification, included in the accompanying
condensed consolidated statements of income is as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 27, | December 28, | December 27, | December 28, | |||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues |
$ | 1,815 | $ | 2,082 | $ | 5,376 | $ | 10,421 | ||||||||
Engineering and development |
| 32 | | 94 | ||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
269 | 808 | 1,886 | 2,425 | ||||||||||||
$ | 2,084 | $ | 2,922 | $ | 7,262 | $ | 12,940 | |||||||||
The following table presents the estimated future amortization expense of purchased intangible
assets as of December 27, 2009:
Fiscal | (In thousands) | |||
2010 (remaining three months) |
$ | 1,676 | ||
2011 |
6,718 | |||
2012 |
6,653 | |||
2013 |
1,088 | |||
2014 |
1,023 | |||
2015 and thereafter |
1,628 | |||
$ | 18,786 | |||
10
Table of Contents
QLOGIC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 6. Treasury Stock
Since fiscal 2003, the Company has had various stock repurchase programs that authorized the
purchase of up to $1.55 billion of the Companys outstanding common stock. During the nine months
ended December 27, 2009, the Company purchased 7.0 million shares of its common stock for an
aggregate purchase price of $108.7 million. As of December 27, 2009, the Company had purchased a
total of 89.5 million shares of common stock under these repurchase programs for an aggregate
purchase price of $1.39 billion.
Repurchased shares have been recorded as treasury shares and will be held until the Companys
Board of Directors designates that these shares be retired or used for other purposes.
Note 7. Stock-Based Compensation
During the nine months ended December 27, 2009, the Company granted options to purchase 3.8
million shares of common stock and 1.5 million restricted stock units with weighted average grant
date fair values of $5.30 and $13.84 per share, respectively.
A summary of stock-based compensation expense, excluding stock-based compensation related to
acquisitions, recorded by functional line item in the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of income is as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 27, | December 28, | December 27, | December 28, | |||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues |
$ | 650 | $ | 569 | $ | 2,039 | $ | 1,577 | ||||||||
Engineering and development |
4,222 | 3,748 | 13,719 | 11,600 | ||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
1,629 | 1,288 | 5,230 | 4,303 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
1,955 | 1,400 | 6,034 | 4,664 | ||||||||||||
$ | 8,456 | $ | 7,005 | $ | 27,022 | $ | 22,144 | |||||||||
Note 8. Special Charges
The Company recorded special charges of $0.9 million during the three months ended September
27, 2009 related to its acquisition of NetXen. The special charges consisted of exit costs related
to the former NetXen leased facility that the Company vacated and severance benefits for
involuntarily terminated employees. As of December 27, 2009, all severance benefits had been paid.
The unpaid exit costs associated with the leased facility are expected to be paid over the next
nine months.
During the three months ended December 28, 2008, the Company implemented a workforce reduction
initiative, primarily in response to the macroeconomic environment, and recorded special charges
totaling $1.4 million associated with the cost of severance benefits for the affected employees,
all of which had been paid as of December 27, 2009.
Note 9. Interest and Other Income, Net
Components of interest and other income, net, are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 27, | December 28, | December 27, | December 28, | |||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 1,203 | $ | 2,850 | $ | 4,216 | $ | 9,435 | ||||||||
Gain on sales of available-for-sale securities |
798 | 559 | 4,200 | 993 | ||||||||||||
Loss on sales of available-for-sale securities |
(282 | ) | (87 | ) | (1,715 | ) | (129 | ) | ||||||||
Gain on recognition of put options (see Note 3) |
| 8,147 | | 8,147 | ||||||||||||
Loss on trading securities |
| (4,542 | ) | | (4,542 | ) | ||||||||||
Impairment of investment securities |
| (4,259 | ) | | (12,002 | ) | ||||||||||
Other |
17 | (157 | ) | 295 | 133 | |||||||||||
$ | 1,736 | $ | 2,511 | $ | 6,996 | $ | 2,035 | |||||||||
11
Table of Contents
QLOGIC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 10. Income Taxes
The Companys provision for income taxes was $19.0 million and $55.5 million for the nine
months ended December 27, 2009 and December 28, 2008, respectively. The effective income tax rate
was 24% and 38% for the nine months ended December 27, 2009 and December 28, 2008, respectively.
The effective income tax rate is based upon the estimated income for the year, the composition of
the estimated income in different tax jurisdictions, and adjustments, if any, in the applicable
quarterly periods for the potential tax consequences, benefits or resolutions of tax audits or
other tax contingencies. The allocation of taxable income to domestic and foreign tax
jurisdictions impacts the effective tax rate as the Companys income tax rate in foreign
jurisdictions is lower than its income tax rate in the U.S.
Note 11. Net Income Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 27, | December 28, | December 27, | December 28, | |||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 28,648 | $ | 30,790 | $ | 59,774 | $ | 89,592 | ||||||||
Shares: |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding basic |
114,695 | 126,180 | 116,935 | 130,050 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive potential common shares, using treasury stock method |
1,784 | 317 | 1,030 | 882 | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding diluted |
116,479 | 126,497 | 117,965 | 130,932 | ||||||||||||
Net income per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.25 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.69 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.25 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.68 | ||||||||
Stock-based awards, including stock options and restricted stock units, representing 18.1
million and 23.7 million shares of common stock have been excluded from the diluted net income per
share calculations for the three and nine months ended December 27, 2009, respectively, and 27.5
million and 25.2 million shares of common stock have been excluded from the diluted net income per
share calculations for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2008, respectively. These
stock-based awards have been excluded from the diluted net income per share calculations because
their effect would have been antidilutive.
Note 12. Comprehensive Income
Components of comprehensive income are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 27, | December 28, | December 27, | December 28, | |||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 28,648 | $ | 30,790 | $ | 59,774 | $ | 89,592 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||
Changes in unrealized gains on investment securities, net of tax |
16 | 4,173 | 529 | 2,821 | ||||||||||||
$ | 28,664 | $ | 34,963 | $ | 60,303 | $ | 92,413 | |||||||||
12
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and
related notes. In this discussion and elsewhere in this report, we make forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are made in reliance upon safe harbor provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements include, without
limitation, descriptions of our expectations regarding future trends affecting our business and
other statements regarding future events or our objectives, goals, strategies, beliefs and
underlying assumptions that are other than statements of historical fact. When used in this report,
the words anticipates, believes, can, continue, could, estimates, expects, intends,
may, plans, potential, predicts, should, will and similar expressions, or the negative
of such expressions, are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. Statements
concerning current conditions may also be forward-looking if they imply a continuation of current
conditions. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements as a result of several factors, including, but not limited to those
factors set forth and discussed in Part II, Item 1A Risk Factors and elsewhere in this report. In
light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking information included in this
report, the inclusion of this information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any
other person that our objectives or plans will be achieved. You are cautioned, therefore, not to
place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are made only as of the date of
this report. We undertake no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Overview
We are a designer and supplier of high performance storage networking, server networking, data
networking and converged networking infrastructure solutions. Our solutions are sold worldwide,
primarily to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, and distributors. We sell Fibre Channel and
Internet Small Computer Systems Interface, or iSCSI, host bus adapters; InfiniBand® host channel
adapters; Fibre Channel over Ethernet, or FCoE, converged network adapters; and Ethernet adapters,
which we collectively refer to as Host Products. We sell Fibre Channel switches, including
stackable edge, blade and virtualized pass-through switches; InfiniBand switches, including
high-end multi-protocol directors, edge and blade switches; Enhanced Ethernet pass-through modules;
and storage routers for bridging Fibre Channel and iSCSI networks, which we collectively refer to
as Network Products. We also sell Fibre Channel controllers, iSCSI controllers, converged network
controllers and Ethernet controllers, all for select embedded and target applications, which we
collectively refer to as Silicon Products.
Our products are incorporated in solutions from a number of OEM customers, including Cisco
Systems, Inc., Dell Inc., EMC Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Company, International Business Machines
Corporation, NetApp, Inc., Sun Microsystems, Inc. and many others.
Business Combination
On April 27, 2009, we acquired NetXen, Inc. (NetXen) in a merger transaction. Cash
consideration was $17.6 million for all outstanding NetXen capital stock. NetXen developed,
marketed and sold Ethernet adapter and controller products targeted at the enterprise server
market. The acquisition expanded our product portfolio to include Ethernet networking products that
are complementary to our existing products. The acquisition also expanded our expertise to better
address a wider range of emerging customer requirements for converged networks. The acquisition
agreement required that $5.1 million of the consideration be placed into an escrow account in
connection with certain representations and warranties. The consideration placed in escrow is
scheduled to be released between 18 and 24 months after the date of the acquisition. The escrowed
amounts have been accounted for as cash consideration as of the date of the acquisition.
Third Quarter Financial Highlights and Other Information
A summary of the key factors and significant events which impacted our financial performance
during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 are as follows:
| Net revenues of $149.1 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 increased sequentially by $17.6 million, or 13%, from $131.5 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Revenues from Host Products of $110.4 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 increased sequentially by $16.4 million, or 17%, from $94.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. | ||
| Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues increased to 64.4% for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 from 63.7% in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. |
13
Table of Contents
| Operating income as a percentage of net revenues increased to 23.2% for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 from 15.8% in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. | ||
| Net income increased to $28.6 million, or $0.25 per diluted share, in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 from $16.2 million, or $0.14 per diluted share, in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. | ||
| Cash, cash equivalents and investment securities increased to $349.2 million at December 27, 2009 from $340.4 million at September 27, 2009. | ||
| Accounts receivable was $86.1 million as of December 27, 2009, compared to $75.2 million as of September 27, 2009. Days sales outstanding (DSO) in receivables was 53 days as of December 27, 2009 compared to 52 days as of September 27, 2009. | ||
| Inventories were $21.8 million as of December 27, 2009, compared to $23.3 million as of September 27, 2009. Our annualized inventory turns in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 increased to 9.7 turns from 8.2 turns in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. |
As a result of worldwide economic uncertainty, it is extremely difficult for us and our
customers to forecast future sales levels based on historical information and trends. Portions of
our expenses are fixed and others are tied to expected levels of sales activities. To the extent
that we do not achieve our anticipated level of sales, our gross profit and net income could be
adversely affected until such expenses are reduced to an appropriate level.
Results of Operations
Net Revenues
A summary of the components of our net revenues is as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 27, | December 28, | December 27, | December 28, | |||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Host Products |
$ | 110.4 | $ | 112.2 | $ | 292.8 | $ | 352.5 | ||||||||
Network Products |
27.4 | 32.8 | 76.9 | 92.5 | ||||||||||||
Silicon Products |
8.7 | 16.5 | 25.7 | 47.7 | ||||||||||||
Royalty and Service |
2.6 | 2.2 | 8.0 | 10.6 | ||||||||||||
Total net revenues |
$ | 149.1 | $ | 163.7 | $ | 403.4 | $ | 503.3 | ||||||||
Percentage of net revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Host Products |
74 | % | 69 | % | 73 | % | 70 | % | ||||||||
Network Products |
18 | 20 | 19 | 18 | ||||||||||||
Silicon Products |
6 | 10 | 6 | 10 | ||||||||||||
Royalty and Service |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Total net revenues |
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||
Historically, the global marketplace for network infrastructure solutions has expanded in
response to the information storage requirements of enterprise business environments, as well as
the market for solutions in high performance computing environments. These markets have been
characterized by rapid advances in technology and related product performance, which has generally
resulted in declining average selling prices over time. In general, our revenues have been
favorably affected by increases in units sold as a result of market expansion and the release of
new products. The favorable effect on our revenues as a result of increases in volume has been
partially offset by the impact of declining average selling prices.
The United States and other countries around the world have been experiencing deteriorating
economic conditions. This economic decline has resulted in a global downturn in information
technology spending rates, which has negatively impacted our revenue and operating results.
Accordingly, it is extremely difficult for us to forecast future sales levels and historical
information may not be indicative of future trends.
Our net revenues are derived primarily from the sale of Host Products, Network Products and
Silicon Products. Net revenues decreased 9% to $149.1 million for the three months ended December
27, 2009 from $163.7 million for the three months ended
14
Table of Contents
December 28, 2008. This decrease was primarily the result of a $1.8 million, or 2%, decrease
in revenue from Host Products; a $5.4 million, or 16%, decrease in revenue from Network Products;
and a $7.8 million, or 47%, decrease in revenue from Silicon Products. The decrease in revenue
from Host Products was primarily due to a 6% decrease in the average selling prices of host bus
adapters on a consistent unit volume, partially offset by an over 400% increase in revenue from the
early market acceptance of FCoE adapters and the addition of Ethernet adapters as a result of the
NetXen acquisition. The decrease in revenue from Network Products was primarily due to a 61%
decrease in the number of Infiniband switches sold, partially offset by a 48% increase in the
average selling prices of these products, primarily due to a change in mix to higher capacity
switches. Revenue from Network Products was also impacted by a 10% decrease in the number of Fibre
Channel switches sold and a 2% decrease in the average selling prices of these products. The
decrease in revenue from Silicon Products was due primarily to a 42% decrease in the units of
protocol chips sold and a 10% decrease in the average selling prices of these products. Net
revenues for the three months ended December 27, 2009 included $2.6 million of royalty and service
revenue compared with $2.2 million of royalty and service revenue for the three months ended
December 28, 2008. Royalty and service revenues are unpredictable and we do not expect them to be
significant to our overall revenues.
Net revenues decreased 20% to $403.4 million for the nine months ended December 27, 2009 from
$503.3 million for the nine months ended December 28, 2008. This decrease was primarily the result
of a $59.7 million, or 17%, decrease in revenue from Host Products; a $15.6 million, or 17%,
decrease in revenue from Network Products; and a $22.0 million, or 46%, decrease in revenue from
Silicon Products. The decrease in revenue from Host Products was primarily due to a 14% decrease
in the quantity of host bus adapters sold and a 6% decrease in the average selling prices of these
products, partially offset by an over 500% increase in revenue from the early market acceptance of
FCoE adapters and the addition of Ethernet adapters as a result of the NetXen acquisition. The
decrease in revenue from Network Products was primarily due to a 15% decrease in the number of
Fibre Channel switches sold and a 10% decrease in the average selling prices of these products.
The decrease in revenue from Silicon Products was due primarily to a 34% decrease in the units of
protocol chips sold, an 11% decrease in the average selling prices of these products and a $3.8
million decrease in revenue from management controller chips, as these products reached end-of-life
in fiscal 2009. Net revenues for the nine months ended December 27, 2009 included $8.0 million of
royalty and service revenue compared with $10.6 million of royalty and service revenue for the nine
months ended December 28, 2008.
A small number of our customers account for a substantial portion of our net revenues, and we
expect that a small number of customers will continue to represent a substantial portion of our net
revenues for the foreseeable future. Our top ten customers accounted for 88% and 83% of net
revenues during the nine months ended December 27, 2009 and December, 28, 2008, respectively.
We believe that our major customers continually evaluate whether or not to purchase products
from alternative or additional sources. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that a major
customer will not reduce, delay or eliminate its purchases from us. Any such reduction, delay or
loss of purchases could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or
results of operations.
Net revenues by geographic area are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 27, | December 28, | December 27, | December 28, | |||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 66.5 | $ | 75.8 | $ | 185.9 | $ | 240.1 | ||||||||
Asia-Pacific and Japan |
37.6 | 39.0 | 100.4 | 111.4 | ||||||||||||
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
35.5 | 40.4 | 91.7 | 123.4 | ||||||||||||
Rest of the world |
9.5 | 8.5 | 25.4 | 28.4 | ||||||||||||
Total net revenues |
$ | 149.1 | $ | 163.7 | $ | 403.4 | $ | 503.3 | ||||||||
Revenues by geographic area are presented based upon the country of destination, which is not
necessarily indicative of the location of the ultimate end-user of our products.
15
Table of Contents
Gross Profit
Gross profit represents net revenues less cost of revenues. Cost of revenues consists
primarily of the cost of purchased products, assembly and test services; costs associated with
product procurement, inventory management, logistics and product quality; and the amortization of
purchased intangible assets. A summary of our gross profit and related percentage of net revenues
is as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 27, | December 28, | December 27, | December 28, | |||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 96.1 | $ | 108.9 | $ | 258.1 | $ | 337.8 | ||||||||
Percentage of net revenues |
64.4 | % | 66.5 | % | 64.0 | % | 67.1 | % |
Gross profit for the three months ended December 27, 2009 decreased $12.8 million, or 12%,
from gross profit for the three months ended December 28, 2008. The gross profit percentage for
the three months ended December 27, 2009 was 64.4% and decreased from 66.5% for the corresponding
period in the prior year. The decrease in gross profit percentage was primarily due to lower
volumes to absorb manufacturing costs and a change in product mix.
Gross profit for the nine months ended December 27, 2009 decreased $79.7 million, or 24%, from
gross profit for the nine months ended December 28, 2008. The gross profit percentage for the nine
months ended December 27, 2009 was 64.0% and decreased from 67.1% for the corresponding period in
the prior year. The decrease in gross profit percentage was primarily due to lower volumes to
absorb manufacturing costs, a change in product mix and a $3.5 million one-time royalty in fiscal
2009, partially offset by a $5.0 million decrease in amortization of purchased intangible assets.
Our ability to maintain our current gross profit percentage can be significantly affected by
factors such as manufacturing volumes over which fixed costs are absorbed, sales discounts and
customer incentives, component costs, the mix of products shipped, the transition to new products,
competitive price pressures, the timeliness of volume shipments of new products, the level of
royalties received, our ability to achieve manufacturing cost reductions, and amortization and
impairments of purchased intangible assets. We anticipate that it will be increasingly difficult
to reduce manufacturing costs. As a result of these and other factors, it may be difficult to
maintain our gross profit percentage consistent with historical periods and it may decline in the
future.
Operating Expenses
Our operating expenses are summarized in the following table:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 27, | December 28, | December 27, | December 28, | |||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Engineering and development |
$ | 34.0 | $ | 33.1 | $ | 102.3 | $ | 100.6 | ||||||||
Sales and marketing |
18.8 | 20.9 | 58.2 | 67.9 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
8.8 | 8.2 | 24.9 | 24.9 | ||||||||||||
Special charges |
| 1.4 | 0.9 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
$ | 61.6 | $ | 63.6 | $ | 186.3 | $ | 194.8 | ||||||||
Percentage of net revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Engineering and development |
22.8 | % | 20.2 | % | 25.4 | % | 20.0 | % | ||||||||
Sales and marketing |
12.6 | 12.8 | 14.4 | 13.5 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
5.9 | 5.0 | 6.2 | 4.9 | ||||||||||||
Special charges |
| 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
41.3 | % | 38.9 | % | 46.2 | % | 38.7 | % | ||||||||
Engineering and Development. Engineering and development expenses consist primarily of
compensation and related employee benefit costs, service and material costs, occupancy costs and
related computer support costs. During the three months ended December 27, 2009, engineering and
development expenses increased to $34.0 million from $33.1 million for the three months ended
December 28, 2008. The increase in engineering and development expenses was primarily due to a $0.5
million increase in stock-based compensation and a $0.4 million increase in new product
development.
16
Table of Contents
During the nine months ended December 27, 2009, engineering and development expenses increased
to $102.3 million from $100.6 million for the nine months ended December 28, 2008. The increase in
engineering and development expenses was primarily due to a $1.8 million increase in stock-based
compensation.
We believe continued investments in engineering and development activities are critical to
achieving future design wins, expansion of our customer base and revenue growth opportunities.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of compensation and
related employee benefit costs, sales commissions, promotional activities and travel for sales and
marketing personnel. Sales and marketing expenses decreased to $18.8 million for the three months
ended December 27, 2009 from $20.9 million for the three months ended December 28, 2008. The
decrease in sales and marketing expenses was due primarily to a $1.3 million decrease in
promotional costs, including the costs for certain sales and marketing programs, and a $0.5 million
decrease in amortization of purchased intangible assets. The decrease in amortization expense is
due to an intangible asset becoming fully amortized during the three months ended December 27,
2009.
Sales and marketing expenses decreased to $58.2 million for the nine months ended December 27,
2009 from $67.9 million for the nine months ended December 28, 2008. The decrease in sales and
marketing expenses was due primarily to a $4.5 million decrease in promotional costs, including the
costs for certain sales and marketing programs, and a $1.3 million decrease in travel costs, both
related to our cost-cutting measures implemented in the second half of fiscal 2009. In addition,
cash compensation and related employee benefit costs decreased by $2.0 million primarily due to
decreased commissions as a result of lower revenues. Also, amortization of purchased intangible
assets decreased by $0.5 million, as discussed above.
We believe continued investments in our sales and marketing organizational infrastructure and
related marketing programs are critical to the success of our strategy of expanding our customer
base and enhancing relationships with our existing customers.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of
compensation and related employee benefit costs for executive, finance, accounting, human
resources, legal and information technology personnel. Non-compensation components of general and
administrative expenses include accounting, legal and other professional fees, facilities expenses
and other corporate expenses. General and administrative expenses increased to $8.8 million for
the three months ended December 27, 2009 from $8.2 million for the three months ended December 28,
2008. The increase in general and administrative expenses was due primarily to a $0.6 million
increase in stock-based compensation.
General and administrative expenses were consistent at $24.9 million for the nine months ended
December 27, 2009 and December 28, 2008, respectively. During the nine months ended December 27,
2009, stock-based compensation increased by $1.4 million, which was partially offset by a $1.2
million decrease in cash compensation and related employee benefit costs compared to the nine
months ended December 28, 2008.
Special Charges. We recorded special charges of $0.9 million during the three months ended
September 27, 2009, related to our acquisition of NetXen. The special charges consisted of exit
costs related to the former NetXen leased facility that we vacated and severance benefits for
involuntarily terminated employees. As of December 27, 2009, all severance benefits had been paid.
The unpaid exit costs associated with the leased facility are expected to be paid over the next
nine months.
During the three months ended December 28, 2008, we implemented a workforce reduction
initiative, primarily in response to the macroeconomic environment, and recorded special charges
totaling $1.4 million associated with the cost of severance benefits for the affected employees,
all of which had been paid as of December 27, 2009.
17
Table of Contents
Interest and Other Income, Net
Components of our interest and other income, net, are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 27, | December 28, | December 27, | December 28, | |||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 1.2 | $ | 2.9 | $ | 4.2 | $ | 9.4 | ||||||||
Gain on sales of available-for-sale securities |
0.8 | 0.6 | 4.2 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||
Loss on sales of available-for-sale securities |
(0.3 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (1.7 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||
Gain on recognition of put options |
| 8.1 | | 8.1 | ||||||||||||
Loss on trading securities |
| (4.5 | ) | | (4.5 | ) | ||||||||||
Impairment of investment securities |
| (4.3 | ) | | (12.0 | ) | ||||||||||
Other |
| (0.2 | ) | 0.3 | 0.1 | |||||||||||
$ | 1.7 | $ | 2.5 | $ | 7.0 | $ | 2.0 | |||||||||
Interest income is earned on our portfolio of investment securities and cash equivalents. The
decrease in interest income for the three and nine months ended December 27, 2009, from the
corresponding periods in the prior year, was primarily due to a decline in interest rates, as well
as, a decrease in the average balance of our investment securities and cash equivalents.
The gain on recognition of put options, during the three and nine months ended December 28,
2008, resulted from an agreement that we entered into with the broker for substantially all of our
auction rate securities (ARS) that entitles us to sell the related ARS back to the broker for a
price equal to the liquidation preference of the ARS plus accrued but unpaid dividends or interest,
if any, at any time between June 30, 2010 and July 2, 2012, if the securities are not earlier
redeemed or sold.
The loss on trading securities, during the three and nine months ended December 28, 2008, was
due to the realization of $3.4 million of previously unrealized losses that were transferred from
accumulated other comprehensive income as a result of the reclassification of the ARS from
available-for-sale to trading securities and $1.1 million related to changes in the fair market
value of the trading securities subsequent to the reclassification.
We reviewed various factors in determining whether to recognize an impairment charge related
to our unrealized losses in available-for-sale securities, including the current financial and
credit market environment, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer of the
security, the magnitude of the loss compared to the cost of the investment, the length of time the
investment has been in a loss position and our intent and ability to hold the investment for a
period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery of market value. Based on this
analysis, we determined that a portion of the unrealized losses were other-than-temporary and
recorded impairment charges of $4.3 million and $10.3 million related to our portfolio of
available-for-sale securities during the three and nine months ended December 28, 2008,
respectively. In addition, during the nine months ended December 28, 2008, we recorded a $1.7
million impairment charge related to our cost basis investments in a money market fund and an
enhanced cash fund sponsored by The Reserve (an asset management company).
Income Taxes
Our effective income tax rate was 24% and 38% for the nine months ended December 27, 2009 and
December 28, 2008, respectively. We expect the annual effective income tax rate for fiscal 2010 to
approximate 25% as compared to our actual annual effective tax rate of 36% for fiscal 2009. Our
estimated effective tax rate for fiscal 2010 is favorably impacted by additional payments made in
fiscal 2009 in connection with an intercompany technology license related to our intellectual
property. These additional license payments resulted in a larger portion of income taxed at U.S.
rates in fiscal 2009 compared to our estimates for fiscal 2010. In addition, the effective income
tax rate for the nine months ended December 27, 2009 was favorably impacted by (i) higher income
generated from our foreign operations, which are taxed at more favorable rates, (ii) the resolution
of various federal, state and foreign tax matters, (iii) additional benefits related to research
tax credits and (iv) an increase in tax benefits related to stock-based awards. Our effective
income tax rate for the nine months ended December 28, 2008, was adversely impacted by a valuation
allowance against deferred tax assets related to impairment charges on certain investment
securities. Given the increased global scope of our operations, and the complexity of global tax
and transfer pricing rules and regulations, it has become increasingly difficult to estimate
earnings within each tax jurisdiction. If actual earnings within each tax jurisdiction differ
materially from our estimates, we may not achieve our expected effective tax rate. Additionally,
our effective tax rate may be impacted by other items including the tax effects of acquisitions,
newly enacted tax legislation, stock-based compensation and uncertain tax positions.
18
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our combined balances of cash, cash equivalents and investment securities decreased to $349.2
million at December 27, 2009 from $378.3 million at March 29, 2009. The decrease in cash, cash
equivalents and investment securities was due primarily to the purchase of our common stock
pursuant to our stock repurchase program, purchases of property and equipment and the acquisition
of NetXen, partially offset by cash generated from operations and net proceeds from the issuance of
stock under our stock plans. We believe that existing cash, cash equivalents, investment
securities and expected cash flow from operations will provide sufficient funds to finance our
operations for at least the next twelve months. However, it is possible that we may need to
supplement our existing sources of liquidity to finance our activities beyond the next twelve
months or for the future acquisition of businesses, products or technologies and there can be no
assurance that sources of liquidity will be available to us at that time.
Cash provided by operating activities was $92.5 million for the nine months ended December 27,
2009 and $162.4 million for the nine months ended December 28, 2008. Operating cash flow for the
nine months ended December 27, 2009 reflects our net income of $59.8 million and net non-cash
charges of $61.1 million, partially offset by a net increase in the non-cash components of working
capital of $28.4 million. The increase in the non-cash components of working capital was primarily
due to a $19.4 million decrease in accrued taxes, a $17.4 million increase in accounts receivable
and a $9.5 million decrease in accrued compensation, partially offset by a $19.5 million decrease
in inventories. The decrease in accrued taxes and accrued compensation were primarily due to the
timing of payment obligations. The increase in accounts receivable was primarily due to an increase
in net revenues. The decrease in inventories was primarily associated with the completion of a
planned contract manufacturer transition and higher product shipments.
Cash used in investing activities was $57.1 million for the nine months ended December 27,
2009 and consisted of $38.2 million of net purchases of available-for-sale securities, $17.6
million of purchases of property and equipment and $14.9 million for the acquisition of NetXen (net
of cash acquired), partially offset by $10.5 million of proceeds from redemptions of auction rate
securities at par value and distributions totaling $3.1 million from our investments in a money
market fund and enhanced cash fund sponsored by The Reserve (an asset management company). During
the nine months ended December 28, 2008, cash used in investing activities was $27.5 million and
consisted of a $57.2 million reclassification of certain cash equivalents to investment securities
related to our investments in the funds sponsored by The Reserve and purchases of property and
equipment of $21.4 million, partially offset by net sales and maturities of available-for-sale
securities of $41.9 million, distributions totaling $6.5 million from our investments in the funds
sponsored by The Reserve and $2.7 million of proceeds from redemptions of auction rate securities
at par value.
As our business grows, we expect capital expenditures to increase in the future as we continue
to invest in machinery and equipment, more costly engineering and production tools for new
technologies, and enhancements to our corporate information technology infrastructure.
Cash used in financing activities of $93.9 million for the nine months ended December 27, 2009
consisted of our purchase of $109.0 million of common stock under our stock repurchase program,
$2.8 million for minimum tax withholdings paid on behalf of employees for restricted stock units
that vested during the period and the repayment of a $0.9 million line of credit assumed in the
NetXen acquisition, partially offset by $18.8 million of net proceeds from the issuance of common
stock under our stock plans and the related tax effect. During the nine months ended December 28,
2008, cash used in financing activities of $143.3 million consisted of our purchase of $165.2
million of common stock under our stock repurchase program and $2.0 million for minimum tax
withholdings paid on behalf of employees for restricted stock units that vested during the period,
partially offset by $23.9 million of net proceeds from the issuance of common stock under our stock
plans and the related tax effect.
As of December 27, 2009, our investment securities included $21.4 million of investments in
ARS, the majority of which are rated AA or higher. During late fiscal 2008, the market auctions of
many ARS began to fail, including auctions for our ARS. The underlying assets for auction rate
debt securities in our portfolio are student loans, substantially all of which are backed by the
federal government under the Federal Family Education Loan Program. The underlying assets of our
auction rate preferred securities are the respective funds investment portfolios.
In November 2008, we entered into an agreement with the broker for all of the ARS we currently
hold, which provides us with certain rights (ARS Rights), in exchange for the release of potential
claims and damages against the broker. The ARS Rights entitle us to sell the related ARS back to
the broker for a price equal to the liquidation preference of the ARS plus accrued but unpaid
dividends or interest, if any, which price is referred to as par. The ARS Rights may be exercised
by us at any time between June 30, 2010 and July 2, 2012, if the securities are not earlier
redeemed or sold. Under the ARS Rights, the broker may, at its discretion, purchase the ARS at any
time through July 2, 2012 without prior notice to us and must pay us par value for the ARS within
one day of the sale transaction settlement. While we expect to ultimately recover our investments
in the ARS at par, we may be unable to liquidate some
19
Table of Contents
or all of our ARS should we need or desire to access the funds invested in those securities
prior to redemption by the issuer or the exercise of the ARS Rights. There is also a risk that our
broker will default on its obligation to purchase the ARS in the event that we exercise the ARS
Rights.
Our investment securities are valued based on quoted market prices or other observable market
inputs, except for the ARS, the put options related to ARS, and investments accounted for under the
cost method. As of December 27, 2009, the entire $21.4 million portfolio of ARS and the related put
options valued at $3.0 million (collectively, 12% of our investment securities portfolio) were
measured at fair value based primarily on an income approach using estimates of future cash flows.
The assumptions used in preparing the discounted cash flow models included estimates for the amount
and timing of future interest and principal payments, the collateralization of underlying security
investments, the creditworthiness of the issuer and the rate of return required by investors to own
these securities in the current environment, including call and liquidity premiums.
Since fiscal 2003, we have had various stock repurchase programs that authorized the purchase
of up to $1.55 billion of our outstanding common stock. As of December 27, 2009, we had
repurchased a total of 89.5 million shares of our common stock under our stock repurchase programs
for an aggregate purchase price of $1.39 billion. During the nine months ended December 27, 2009,
we repurchased 7.0 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $108.7
million. Pursuant to the existing stock repurchase program, we are authorized to repurchase shares
with an aggregate cost of up to $161.2 million as of December 27, 2009.
We have certain contractual obligations and commitments to make future payments in the form of
non-cancelable purchase orders to our suppliers and commitments under operating lease arrangements.
A summary of our contractual obligations as of December 27, 2009, and their impact on our cash
flows in future fiscal years, is as follows:
2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Remaining | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
three months) | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | Thereafter | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases |
$ | 2.3 | $ | 7.5 | $ | 5.3 | $ | 3.7 | $ | 3.5 | $ | 9.0 | $ | 31.3 | ||||||||||||||
Non-cancelable purchase obligations |
53.8 | 3.1 | | | | | 56.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 56.1 | $ | 10.6 | $ | 5.3 | $ | 3.7 | $ | 3.5 | $ | 9.0 | $ | 88.2 | ||||||||||||||
The amount of unrecognized tax benefits, including related accrued interest and penalties, was
$41.9 million at December 27, 2009. We are not able to provide a reasonable estimate of the timing
of future tax payments related to these obligations.
20
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of net revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We base our estimates on historical
experience and on various other factors, including the current economic environment, which we
believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. We believe the accounting policies
described below to be our most critical accounting policies. These accounting policies are affected
significantly by judgments, assumptions and estimates used in the preparation of the financial
statements and actual results could differ materially from the amounts reported based on these
policies.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue from product sales when the following fundamental criteria are met: (i)
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) the price to the
customer is fixed or determinable and (iv) collection of the resulting accounts receivable is
reasonably assured.
For all sales, we use a binding purchase order or a signed agreement as evidence of an
arrangement. Delivery occurs when goods are shipped and title and risk of loss transfer to the
customer, in accordance with the terms specified in the arrangement with the customer. The
customers obligation to pay and the payment terms are set at the time of delivery and are not
dependent on the subsequent resale of our product. However, certain of our sales are made to
distributors under agreements which contain a limited right to return unsold product and price
protection provisions. We recognize revenue from these distributors based on the sell-through
method using inventory information provided by the distributor. At times, we provide standard
incentive programs to our customers. We account for our competitive pricing incentives, which
generally reflect front-end price adjustments, as a reduction of revenue at the time of sale, and
rebates as a reduction of revenue in the period the related revenue is recorded based on the
specific program criteria and historical experience. In addition, we record provisions against
revenue and cost of revenue for estimated product returns in the same period that revenue is
recognized. These provisions are based on historical experience as well as specifically identified
product returns. Royalty and service revenue is recognized when earned and receipt is reasonably
assured.
For those sales that include multiple deliverables, we allocate revenue based on the relative
fair values of the individual components. When more than one element, such as hardware and
services, are contained in a single arrangement, we allocate revenue between the elements based on
each elements relative fair value, provided that each element meets the criteria for treatment as
a separate unit of accounting. An item is considered a separate unit of accounting if it has value
to the customer on a standalone basis and there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair
value of the undelivered items. Fair value is generally determined based upon the price charged
when the element is sold separately. In the absence of fair value for a delivered element, we
allocate revenue first to the fair value of the undelivered elements and allocate the residual
revenue to the delivered elements. In the absence of fair value for an undelivered element, the
arrangement is accounted for as a single unit of accounting, resulting in a deferral of revenue
recognition for the delivered elements. Such deferred revenue is recognized over the service period
or when all elements have been delivered.
We sell certain software products and related post-contract customer support (PCS). We
recognize revenue from software products when the following fundamental criteria are met: (i)
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) the price to the
customer is fixed or determinable and (iv) collection of the resulting accounts receivable is
probable. Revenue is allocated to undelivered elements based upon vendor-specific objective
evidence (VSOE) of the fair value of the element. VSOE of the fair value is based upon the price
charged when the element is sold separately. Revenue allocated to each element is then recognized
when the basic revenue recognition criteria are met for each element. If we are unable to
determine VSOE of fair value for an undelivered element, the entire amount of revenue from the
arrangement is deferred and recognized over the service period or when all elements have been
delivered.
An allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained for estimated losses resulting from the
inability of our customers to make required payments. This reserve is determined by analyzing
specific customer accounts, applying estimated loss rates to the aging of remaining accounts
receivable balances, and considering the impact of the current economic environment where
appropriate. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in their
inability to pay their accounts when due, additional reserves might be required.
21
Table of Contents
Stock-Based Compensation
We recognize compensation expense for all stock-based payment awards made to employees and
non-employee directors, including stock options, restricted stock units and stock purchases under
our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the ESPP), based on estimated fair values on the date of grant.
The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense
over the requisite service period in our consolidated financial statements. Forfeitures are
estimated at the time of grant based on historical trends and revised, if necessary, in subsequent
periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. We recognize stock-based compensation
expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period for
stock options and restricted stock units, and the offering period for the ESPP. The determination
of fair value of stock-based awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model is affected
by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective
variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, our expected stock price volatility
over the term of the awards and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. In
estimating expected stock price volatility, we use a combination of both historical volatility,
calculated based on the daily closing prices of our common stock over a period equal to the
expected term of the option, and implied volatility, utilizing market data of actively traded
options on our common stock. We believe that the historical volatility of the price of our common
stock over the expected term of the option is a strong indicator of the expected future volatility.
We also believe that implied volatility takes into consideration market expectations of how future
volatility will differ from historical volatility. Accordingly, we believe a combination of both
historical and implied volatility provides the best estimate of the future volatility of the market
price of our common stock. Changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the
estimated fair value of stock-based awards.
Income Taxes
We utilize the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Income tax
positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return should be recognized in the first reporting
period that it is more likely than not the tax position will be sustained upon examination. A tax
position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is initially and subsequently
measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being
realized upon settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant
information. Previously recognized income tax positions that fail to meet the recognition threshold
in a subsequent period are derecognized in that period. We recognize potential accrued interest and
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.
Deferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax consequences of temporary differences
using enacted statutory tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Temporary differences include the
difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets
and liabilities and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. The effect on deferred taxes of a
change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period that includes the enactment date.
A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some of the deferred
tax assets will not be realized. An adjustment to earnings would occur if we determine that we are
able to realize a different amount of our deferred tax assets than currently expected.
As a multinational corporation, we are subject to complex tax laws and regulations in various
jurisdictions. The application of tax laws and regulations is subject to legal and factual
interpretation, judgment and uncertainty. Tax laws themselves are subject to change as a result of
changes in fiscal policy, changes in legislation, evolution of regulations and court rulings.
Therefore, the actual liability for U.S. or foreign taxes may be materially different from our
estimates, which could result in the need to record additional liabilities or potentially to
reverse previously recorded tax liabilities. Differences between actual results and our
assumptions, or changes in our assumptions in future periods, are recorded in the period they
become known.
Investment Securities
Our investment securities include available-for-sale securities, trading securities and other
investment securities and are classified in the consolidated balance sheets based on the nature of
the security and the availability for use in current operations.
Our available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value, based on quoted market prices or
other observable inputs. Unrealized gains and losses, net of related income taxes, on our portfolio
of available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of
accumulated other comprehensive income until realized.
22
Table of Contents
Our trading securities are recorded at fair value with unrealized holding gains and losses
included in earnings and reported in interest and other income, net. In the absence of quoted
market prices for trading securities, we value these securities based on an income approach using
an estimate of future cash flows.
Our other investment securities are accounted for under the cost method and recorded at the
lower of fair value or cost.
We recognize an impairment charge on our available-for-sale and cost method investments when
the decline in the fair value of an investment below its cost basis is judged to be
other-than-temporary. If we intend to sell the security or it is more likely than not that we will
be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any
current-period credit loss, we would recognize the entire impairment in earnings. If we do not
intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the
security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss, the
other-than-temporary impairment shall be separated into (a) the amount representing the credit loss
and (b) the amount related to all other factors. The amount of the other-than-temporary impairment
related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of the other-than-temporary
impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable
taxes. Significant judgment is required in determining the fair value of investment securities in
inactive markets as well as determining when declines in fair value constitute an
other-than-temporary impairment. We consider various factors in determining whether to recognize
an impairment charge, including the current financial and credit market environment, the financial
condition and near-term prospects of the issuer of the security, the magnitude of the loss compared
to the cost of the investment, the length of time the investment has been in a loss position and
our intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any
anticipated recovery of market value.
Realized gains or losses are determined on a specific identification basis and reported in
interest and other income, net, as incurred.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. We write down the
carrying value of our inventory to estimated net realizable value for estimated excess and obsolete
inventory based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. These assumptions are
based on economic conditions and trends (both current and projected), anticipated customer demand
and acceptance of our current products, expected future products and other assumptions. If actual
market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional write-downs may
be required. Once we write down the carrying value of inventory, a new cost basis is established.
Subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in an increase in the newly established
cost basis.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill is recorded as the difference, if any, between the aggregate consideration paid for
an acquisition and the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired. The amounts
and useful lives assigned to intangible assets acquired, other than goodwill, impact the amount and
timing of future amortization. The amount assigned to in-process research and development is
capitalized and accounted for as an indefinite-lived intangible asset until the underlying projects
are completed or abandoned.
Goodwill is not amortized but instead is tested at least annually for impairment, or more
frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate a potential impairment, by comparing
the carrying value to the fair value of the reporting unit to which the goodwill is assigned. A
two-step test is used to identify the potential impairment and to measure the amount of impairment,
if any. The first step is to compare the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount,
including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount,
goodwill is considered impaired and the loss is measured by performing step two. Under step two,
the impairment loss is measured by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit with the
carrying amount of goodwill. We perform the annual test for impairment as of the first day of our
fiscal fourth quarter.
The initial recording and subsequent evaluation for impairment of goodwill and purchased
intangible assets requires the use of significant management judgment regarding the forecasts of
future operating results. It is possible that our business plans may change and our estimates used
may prove to be inaccurate. If our actual results, or the plans and estimates used in future
impairment analyses, are lower than current estimates used, we could incur impairment charges.
23
Table of Contents
Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets, including property and equipment and purchased intangible assets, are
reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. Significant judgment is required in
determining whether a potential indicator of impairment of our long-lived assets exists and in
estimating future cash flows for any necessary impairment tests. Recoverability of assets to be
held and used is measured by the comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future
undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such an asset is considered
to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at
the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. Estimating future net cash
flows and determining proper asset groupings for the purpose of this impairment test requires the
use of significant management judgment. If our actual results, or estimates used in future
impairment analyses, are lower than our current estimates, we could incur impairment charges.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) No. 2009-5, which provides amendments to The FASB Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ASU No. 2009-5 provides clarification
for measuring fair value when a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not
available. ASU No. 2009-5 also clarifies that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a
reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating
to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. ASU No. 2009-5 was
effective for fiscal periods beginning after August 27, 2009. We adopted ASU No. 2009-5 effective
September 28, 2009 and it did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations
or financial position.
In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, which provides amendments to ASC Topic 605
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements. ASU No. 2009-13 replaces and significantly changes
certain guidance in ASC Topic 605. ASU No. 2009-13 modifies the separation criteria of ASC Subtopic
605-25 by eliminating the criterion for objective and reliable evidence of fair value for the
undelivered products or services. Instead, revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables should
be divided into separate units of accounting provided the deliverables meet certain criteria. ASU
No. 2009-13 eliminates the use of the residual method of allocation and requires that arrangement
consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables based on their
relative selling price. ASU No. 2009-13 provides a hierarchy for estimating the selling price for
each of the deliverables. ASU No. 2009-13 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements
entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early
adoption is permitted. We are currently assessing the impact ASU No. 2009-13 will have on our
consolidated results of operations or financial position.
In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-14, Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include
Software Elements. Pursuant to ASU No. 2009-14, all tangible products containing both software and
non-software components that function together to deliver the products essential functionality
will no longer be within the scope of ASC Subtopic 985-605 and will be required to be accounted for
under the guidance in ASU No. 2009-13. ASU No. 2009-14 provides a list of items to consider when
determining whether the software and non-software components function together to deliver a
products essential functionality. ASU No. 2009-14 is effective prospectively for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15,
2010. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently assessing the impact ASU No. 2009-14 will have
on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, which provides amendments to ASC Topic 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ASU No. 2010-06 requires new fair value disclosures and
clarifies certain existing disclosure requirements. ASU No. 2010-06 is effective for fiscal
periods beginning after December 15, 2010 for the requirement to provide information on purchases,
sales, issuances and settlements in the Level 3 rollforward on a gross basis. All other disclosure
requirements under ASU No. 2010-06 are effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15,
2009. We are currently assessing the impact ASU No. 2010-06 will have on our consolidated
financial statements.
24
Table of Contents
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Our cash and cash equivalents are not subject to significant interest rate risk due to the
short maturities of these instruments. As of December 27, 2009, the carrying value of our cash and
cash equivalents approximates fair value.
We maintain a portfolio of investment securities consisting primarily of debt securities,
including government and agency securities, corporate debt obligations, asset and mortgage-backed
securities, and municipal bonds, the majority of which have remaining terms of three years or less.
We are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates as movements in interest rates can result in
changes in the market value of our investments in debt securities. However, due to the short-term
nature of our investment portfolio we do not believe that we are subject to material interest rate
risk.
In accordance with our investment guidelines, we only invest in instruments with high credit
quality ratings and we limit our exposure to any one issuer or type of investment. Our portfolio
of investment securities as of December 27, 2009 includes $179.1 million of securities that are
classified as available for sale. As of December 27, 2009, we had gross unrealized losses
associated with our available-for-sale securities of $0.1 million that were determined by
management to be temporary in nature.
Our portfolio of investment securities as of December 27, 2009 also includes $17.1 million of
auction rate debt securities and $4.3 million of auction rate preferred securities (collectively,
ARS), the majority of which are rated AA or higher, and related put options valued at $3.0 million.
These investment securities are accounted for as trading securities. During late fiscal 2008, the
market auctions of many ARS began to fail, including auctions for our ARS. The underlying assets
for auction rate debt securities in our portfolio are student loans, substantially all of which are
backed by the federal government under the Federal Family Education Loan Program. The underlying
assets of our auction rate preferred securities are the respective funds investment portfolios.
In November 2008, we entered into an agreement with the broker for all of the ARS we currently
hold, which provides us with certain rights (ARS Rights), in exchange for the release of potential
claims and damages against the broker. The ARS Rights entitle us to sell the related ARS back to
the broker for a price equal to the liquidation preference of the ARS plus accrued but unpaid
dividends or interest, if any, which price is referred to as par. The ARS Rights may be exercised
by us at any time between June 30, 2010 and July 2, 2012, if the securities are not earlier
redeemed or sold. Under the ARS Rights, the broker may, at its discretion, purchase the ARS at any
time through July 2, 2012 without prior notice to us and must pay us par value for the ARS within
one day of the sale transaction settlement. While we expect to ultimately recover our investments
in the ARS at par, we may be unable to liquidate some or all of our ARS should we need or desire to
access the funds invested in those securities prior to redemption by the issuer or the exercise of
the ARS Rights. There is also a risk that our broker will default on its obligation to purchase the
ARS in the event that we exercise the ARS Rights.
Based on our existing cash, cash equivalents and investment securities, as well as our
expected cash flows from operating activities, we do not anticipate that the potential lack of
liquidity of our ARS in the near-term will affect our ability to execute our current business plan.
We do not use derivative financial instruments.
25
Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information we are required to
disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
(i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities
and Exchange Commission rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. Our management evaluated, with the participation of our chief
executive officer and chief financial officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures, as such term is defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer
and chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of December 27, 2009. There was no change in our internal control over financial
reporting during our quarter ended December 27, 2009 that materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
26
Table of Contents
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors
We have updated the risk factors discussed in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended March 29, 2009, as set forth below. We do not believe any of the updates constitute
material changes from the risk factors previously discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended March 29, 2009.
Economic weakness and uncertainty has resulted in a decrease in IT spending levels and could result
in further deterioration of our revenues and operating results.
The United States and other countries around the world have been experiencing economic
weakness and uncertainty. There has been an erosion of global consumer confidence amidst concerns
over declining asset values, inflation, energy costs, geopolitical issues, the availability and
cost of credit, rising unemployment, and the stability and solvency of financial institutions,
financial markets, businesses and sovereign nations. We are unable to predict the likely duration
and severity of the disruption in financial markets and adverse economic conditions in the U.S. and
other countries. The economic decline has resulted in a global downturn in information technology,
or IT, spending rates, which has negatively impacted our revenue and operating results. Further
reductions in IT spending rates could result in longer sales cycles, increased inventory
provisions, increased production costs, lower prices for our products and reduced sales volumes.
Even if IT spending rates were to increase, we cannot be certain that the market for storage and
server networking infrastructure solutions would be positively impacted. If economic conditions
worsen, there are future reductions in either domestic or international IT spending rates, or IT
spending rates do not increase, our revenues, operating results and financial condition could
deteriorate further.
As a result of worldwide economic uncertainty, it is extremely difficult for us and our
customers to forecast future revenue levels based on historical information and trends. Portions
of our expenses are fixed and other expenses are tied to expected levels of revenue. To the extent
that we do not achieve our anticipated level of revenue, our operating results could be adversely
affected until such expenses are reduced to an appropriate level. In addition, we have implemented
various cost-cutting measures in order to better align our revenues and cost structure. We may not
be able to identify and implement appropriate further cost savings in a timely manner.
Additionally, we may determine that the costs of implementing reductions outweigh the commensurate
benefits. Should we implement certain cost reductions, there could be adverse consequences on our
business which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial
condition.
We are also subject to various counterparty risks as a result of the economic slowdown,
including the potential insolvency of key suppliers resulting in product delays, inability of
customers to obtain credit to finance purchases of our products and/or potential customer
insolvencies, increased risk that customers may delay payments or fail to pay, and counterparty
failures, particularly financial institutions, negatively impacting our treasury operations. Any
of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial
condition.
Our operating results may fluctuate in future periods, which could cause our stock price to
decline.
We have experienced, and expect to experience in future periods, fluctuations in sales and
operating results from quarter to quarter. In addition, there can be no assurance that we will
maintain our current gross margins or profitability in the future. A significant portion of our net
revenues in each fiscal quarter results from orders booked in that quarter. Orders placed by major
customers are typically based on their forecasted sales and inventory levels for our products.
Fluctuations in our quarterly operating results may also be the result of:
| the timing, size and mix of orders from customers; | |
| gain or loss of significant customers; | |
| customer policies pertaining to desired inventory levels of our products; | |
| negotiated rebates and extended payment terms; | |
| changes in our ability to anticipate in advance the mix of customer orders; |
27
Table of Contents
| levels of inventory our customers require us to maintain in our inventory hub locations; | |
| the availability and sale of new products; | |
| shifts or changes in technology; | |
| changes in the mix or average selling prices of our products; | |
| variations in manufacturing capacities, efficiencies and costs; | |
| the availability and cost of components, including silicon chips; | |
| variations in product development costs, especially related to advanced technologies; | |
| variations in operating expenses; | |
| changes in effective income tax rates, including those resulting from changes in tax laws; | |
| our ability to timely produce products that comply with new environmental restrictions or related requirements of our original equipment manufacturer, or OEM, customers; | |
| actual events, circumstances, outcomes and amounts differing from judgments, assumptions and estimates used in determining the value of certain assets (including the amounts of related valuation allowances), liabilities and other items reflected in our consolidated financial statements; | |
| the timing of revenue recognition and revenue deferrals; | |
| gains or losses related to our investment securities; | |
| changes in accounting rules; | |
| changes in our accounting policies; | |
| general economic and other conditions affecting the timing of customer orders and capital spending; or | |
| changes in the global economy that impact IT spending. |
In addition, our quarterly results of operations are influenced by competitive factors,
including the pricing and availability of our products and our competitors products. Furthermore,
communications regarding new products and technologies could cause our customers to defer or cancel
purchases of our products. Order deferrals by our customers, delays in our introduction of new
products, and longer than anticipated design-in cycles for our products have in the past adversely
affected our quarterly results of operations. Due to these factors, as well as other unanticipated
factors, it is likely that in some future quarter or quarters our operating results will be below
the expectations of public market analysts or investors, and as a result, the price of our common
stock could significantly decrease.
We expect gross margin to vary over time, and our recent level of gross margin may not be sustainable.
Our recent level of gross margin may not be sustainable and may be adversely affected by
numerous factors, including:
| changes in product mix; | |
| changes in manufacturing volumes over which fixed costs are absorbed; | |
| increased price competition; | |
| introduction of new products by us or our competitors, including products with advantages in price, performance or features; | |
| our inability to reduce manufacturing-related or component costs; |
28
Table of Contents
| entry into new markets or the acquisition of new businesses; | |
| amortization and impairments of purchased intangible assets; | |
| sales discounts and customer incentives; | |
| increases in material, labor or overhead costs; | |
| excess inventory and inventory holding charges; | |
| changes in distribution channels; | |
| increased warranty costs; and | |
| how well we execute our business strategy and operating plans. |
Our stock price may be volatile.
The market price of our common stock has fluctuated substantially, and there can be no
assurance that such volatility will not continue. Several factors could impact our stock price
including, but not limited to:
| differences between our actual revenues and operating results and the published expectations of analysts; | |
| quarterly fluctuations in our revenues and operating results; | |
| introduction of new products or changes in product pricing policies by our competitors or us; | |
| conditions in the markets in which we operate; | |
| changes in market projections by industry forecasters; | |
| changes in estimates of our earnings by industry analysts; | |
| operating results or forecasts of our major customers or competitors; | |
| overall market conditions for high technology equities; | |
| rumors or dissemination of false information; and | |
| general economic and geopolitical conditions. |
In addition, stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume volatility in recent
years and stock prices of technology companies have been especially volatile. This volatility has
had a substantial effect on the market prices of securities of many public companies for reasons
frequently unrelated to the operating performance of the specific companies. These broad market
fluctuations could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Our business is dependent, in large part, on the continued growth of the networking markets that we
serve and if these markets do not continue to develop, our business will suffer.
A significant number of our products are used in storage area networks, or SANs, and server
networks. Therefore, our business is dependent on the SAN and server network infrastructure
markets. Our success in generating revenue in these markets will depend on, among other things, our
ability to:
| educate potential OEM customers, distributors, resellers, system integrators, storage system providers and end-user organizations about the benefits of our products; |
29
Table of Contents
| maintain and enhance our relationships with OEM customers, distributors, resellers, system integrators and storage system providers; | |
| predict and base our products on standards which ultimately become industry standards; and | |
| achieve interoperability between our products and other components from diverse vendors. |
Our business could be adversely affected by the broad adoption of server virtualization technology.
Server virtualization technologies, which allow a single server to handle the function that
was previously performed by many individual servers, are gaining momentum in the industry. The
broad implementation of server virtualization could result in a decrease in the demand for servers,
which could result in a lower demand for our products. This could have a material adverse effect
on our business or results of operations.
Our business could be adversely affected by a significant increase in the market acceptance of blade servers.
Blade server products have gained acceptance in the market over the past few years. Blade
servers use custom SAN infrastructure products, including blade switches and mezzanine cards, which
have lower average selling prices than the SAN infrastructure products used in a non-blade server
environment. If blade servers gain an increased percentage of the overall server market, our
business could be adversely affected by the transition to blade server products. This could have a
material adverse effect on our business or results of operations.
Our financial condition will be materially harmed if we do not maintain and gain market acceptance of our products.
The markets in which we compete involve rapidly changing technology, evolving industry
standards and continuing improvements in products and services. Our future success depends, in
part, on our ability to:
| enhance our current products and develop and introduce in a timely manner new products that keep pace with technological developments and industry standards; | |
| compete effectively on the basis of price and performance; and | |
| adequately address OEM and end-user customer requirements and achieve market acceptance. |
We believe that to remain competitive, we will need to continue to develop new products, which
will require a significant investment. Our competitors may be developing alternative technologies,
which may adversely affect the market acceptance of our products. Although we continue to explore
and develop products based on new technologies, a substantial portion of our revenues is generated
today from Fibre Channel technology. If alternative technologies are adopted by the industry, we
may not be able to develop products for new technologies in a timely manner. Further, even if
alternative technologies do augment Fibre Channel revenues, our products may not be fully developed
in time to be accepted by our customers. Even if our new products are developed on time, we may not
be able to manufacture them at competitive prices or in sufficient volumes.
We recently began shipping products based on the Fibre Channel over Ethernet, or FCoE,
protocol. FCoE is a developing converged networking technology that provides a unified storage and
data network over enhanced Ethernet, while preserving the investment in existing Fibre Channel
infrastructure and storage. As with most emerging technologies, it is expected that the market for
FCoE will take a number of years to develop and mature. We expect products based on the FCoE
protocol to supplement, and perhaps replace, certain products based on the Fibre Channel protocol.
As a result, an inability to maintain our market share in the Fibre Channel market and build upon
our market share in the FCoE market could have a material adverse effect on our business or results
of operations.
We depend on a small number of customers, and any decrease in revenues or cash flows from any one
of our major customers could adversely affect our results of operations and cause our stock price
to decline.
A small number of customers account for a substantial portion of our net revenues, and we
expect that a small number of customers will continue to represent a substantial portion of our net
revenues in the foreseeable future. Our top ten customers accounted for 88% and 83% of net revenues for the nine months ended December 27, 2009 and
December 28, 2008, respectively. We
30
Table of Contents
are also subject to credit risk associated with the
concentration of our accounts receivable. In addition, the worldwide economic slowdown and
tightening of credit in financial markets may impact the businesses of our customers, which could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our customers generally order products through written purchase orders as opposed to long-term
supply contracts and, therefore, are generally not obligated to purchase products from us for any
extended period. Major customers also have significant leverage over us and may attempt to change
the terms, including pricing and payment terms, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition or results of operations. This risk is increased due to the potential
for some of these customers to merge with or acquire one or more of our other customers. As our OEM
customers are pressured to reduce prices as a result of competitive factors, we may be required to
contractually commit to price reductions for our products before we know how, or if, cost
reductions can be obtained. If we are unable to achieve such cost reductions, our gross margins
could decline and such decline could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition or results of operations.
Our business may be subject to seasonal fluctuations and uneven sales patterns in the future.
A large percentage of our products are sold to customers who experience seasonality and uneven
sales patterns in their businesses. As a result, we may experience similar seasonality and uneven
sales patterns. We believe this uneven sales pattern is a result of many factors including:
| the tendency of our customers to close a disproportionate percentage of their sales transactions in the last month, weeks and days of each quarter; | |
| spikes in sales during the fourth quarter of each calendar year that some of our customers experience; and | |
| differences between our quarterly fiscal periods and the fiscal periods of our customers. |
In addition, as our customers increasingly require us to maintain products at hub locations
near their facilities, it becomes increasingly difficult for us to predict sales trends. Our uneven
sales pattern also makes it extremely difficult to predict the demand of our customers and adjust
manufacturing capacity accordingly. If we predict demand that is substantially greater than actual
customer orders, we will have excess inventory. Alternatively, if customer orders substantially
exceed predicted demand, the ability to assemble, test and ship orders received in the last weeks
and days of each quarter may be limited, or at an increased cost, which could have a material
adverse effect on quarterly revenues and earnings.
Competition within the markets for our products is intense and includes various established competitors.
The markets for our products are highly competitive and are characterized by short product
life cycles, price erosion, rapidly changing technology, frequent product improvements and evolving
industry standards. In the traditional Fibre Channel adapter market, we compete primarily with
Emulex Corporation, followed by Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. In the iSCSI adapter market,
we compete primarily with Chelsio Communications, Inc. and we also compete with companies offering
software initiator solutions. In the FCoE adapter market, we compete with traditional Fibre Channel
players like Emulex Corporation and Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., as well as Ethernet
adapter suppliers such as Broadcom Corporation and Intel Corporation. In the Intelligent Ethernet
adapter market, we compete with Intel Corporation, Broadcom Corporation and Emulex Corporation. In
the Fibre Channel switch and storage router markets, we compete primarily with Brocade
Communications Systems, Inc. and Cisco Systems, Inc. Our competition in the Fibre Channel switch
market includes well-established participants who have significantly more sales and marketing
resources to develop and penetrate this market. In the InfiniBand adapter and switch markets, we
compete primarily with Voltaire Ltd. and Mellanox Technologies, Ltd. We may also compete with some
of our server and storage systems customers, some of which have the capability to develop products
comparable to those we offer.
We need to continue to develop products appropriate to our markets to remain competitive as
our competitors continue to introduce products with improved features. While we continue to devote
significant resources to engineering and development, these efforts may not be successful or
competitive products may not be developed and introduced in a timely manner. In addition, while
relatively few competitors offer a full range of storage and server networking infrastructure
products, additional domestic and foreign manufacturers may increase their presence in these
markets. We may not be able to compete successfully against these or other competitors. If we are
unable to design, develop or introduce competitive new products on a timely basis, our future
operating results may be materially and adversely affected.
31
Table of Contents
We expect the pricing of our products to continue to decline, which could reduce our revenues, gross margins and profitability.
We expect the average unit prices of our products (on a like-for-like product comparison
basis) to decline in the future as a result of competitive pricing pressures, increased sales
discounts and customer incentives, new product introductions by us or our competitors, or other
factors. In addition, there is a general market trend of customers migrating away from the
distribution channel for product purchases to OEMs, where products have a lower average unit price.
If we are unable to offset these factors by increasing sales volumes, or reducing product
manufacturing costs, our total revenues and gross margins may decline. In addition, we must develop
and introduce new products and product enhancements. Moreover, most of our expenses are fixed in
the short-term or incurred in advance of receipt of corresponding revenues. As a result, we may not
be able to decrease our spending to offset any unexpected shortfall in revenues. If this occurs,
our operating results and gross margins may be below our expectations and the expectations of
investors and public market analysts, and our stock price could be negatively affected.
Our distributors may not adequately stock and sell our products and their reseller customers may
purchase products from our competitors, which could negatively affect our results of operations.
Our distributors generally offer a diverse array of products from several different
manufacturers and suppliers. Accordingly, we are at risk that these distributors may give higher
priority to stocking and selling products from other suppliers, thus reducing their efforts and
ability to sell our products. A reduction in sales efforts by our current distributors could
materially and adversely impact our business or results of operations. In addition, if we decrease
our distributor-incentive programs (i.e., competitive pricing and rebates), our distributors may
decrease the amount of product purchased from us. This could result in a change of business
behavior, and distributors may decide to decrease the amount of product held and reduce their
inventory levels, which could impact availability of our products to their customers.
As a result of these factors regarding our distributors or other unrelated factors, the
reseller customers of our distributors could decide to purchase products developed and manufactured
by our competitors. Any loss of demand for our products by value-added resellers and system
integrators could have a material adverse effect on our business or results of operations.
We are dependent on sole source and limited source suppliers for certain key components.
We purchase certain key components used in the manufacture of our products from single or
limited sources. We purchase application-specific integrated circuits, or ASICs, from single
sources and we purchase microprocessors, certain connectors, logic chips, power supplies and
programmable logic devices from limited sources. If one of these suppliers experiences an
interruption in its ability to supply our needs, or chooses to sever their relationship with us, we
may be unable to produce certain of our products, which could result in the loss of customers and
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. The global economic downturn and
tightening of credit in financial markets may adversely impact our suppliers by limiting their
ability to finance their business operations and as a result limit their ability to supply products
to us.
We are dependent on worldwide third-party subcontractors and contract manufacturers.
Third-party subcontractors located outside the United States assemble and test certain
products for us. To the extent that we rely upon third-party subcontractors to perform these
functions, we will not be able to directly control product delivery schedules and quality
assurance. This lack of control may result in product shortages or quality assurance problems that
could delay shipments of products or increase manufacturing, assembly, testing or other costs. If
any of these subcontractors experience capacity constraints or financial difficulties, suffer
damage to their facilities, experience power outages or any other disruption of assembly or testing
capacity, we may not be able to obtain alternative assembly and testing services in a timely
manner.
In addition, the loss of any of our major third-party contract manufacturers could
significantly impact our ability to produce products for an indefinite period of time. Qualifying a
new contract manufacturer and commencing volume production is a lengthy and expensive process. Some
customers will not purchase any products, other than a limited number of evaluation units, until
they qualify the manufacturing line for the product, and we may not always be able to satisfy the
qualification requirements of these customers. If we are required to change a contract manufacturer
or if a contract manufacturer experiences delays, disruptions, capacity constraints, component
parts shortages or quality control problems in its manufacturing operations, shipment of our
products to our customers could be delayed, resulting in loss or postponement of revenues and
potential harm to our competitive position and relationship with customers. In addition, the global
economic downturn and tightening of credit markets could adversely affect our
32
Table of Contents
third-party subcontractors or contract manufacturers and increase the potential for one
or more of them to experience financial distress or bankruptcy.
Our investment securities portfolio could experience a decline in market value which could
materially and adversely affect our financial results.
As of December 27, 2009, we held short-term investment securities totaling $204.1 million. We
invest primarily in debt securities, the majority of which are high investment grade, and we limit
the exposure to credit risk through diversification and investment in highly-rated securities.
However, investing in highly-rated securities does not entirely mitigate the risk of potential
declines in market value. During fiscal 2009, we recorded impairment charges related to investment
securities, including securities issued by companies in the financial services sector that had
previously been rated AA or higher. A further deterioration in the economy, including further
tightening of credit markets or significant volatility in interest rates, could cause additional
declines in value of our investment securities or could impact the liquidity of the portfolio. If
market conditions deteriorate significantly, our results of operations or financial condition could
be materially and adversely affected.
Our investment securities include $21.4 million of investments in auction rate debt and
preferred securities (ARS), the majority of which are rated AA or higher. During late fiscal 2008,
the market auctions of many ARS began to fail, including auctions for our ARS. The underlying
assets for auction rate debt securities in our portfolio are student loans, substantially all of
which are backed by the federal government under the Federal Family Education Loan Program. The
underlying assets of our auction rate preferred securities are the respective funds investment
portfolios.
In November 2008, we entered into an agreement with the broker for all of the ARS we currently
hold, which provides us with certain rights (ARS Rights), in exchange for the release of potential
claims and damages against the broker. The ARS Rights entitle us to sell the related ARS back to
the broker for a price equal to the liquidation preference of the ARS plus accrued but unpaid
dividends or interest, if any, which price is referred to as par. The ARS Rights may be
exercised by us at any time between June 30, 2010 and July 2, 2012, if the securities are not
earlier redeemed or sold. Under the ARS Rights, the broker may, at its discretion, purchase the
ARS at any time through July 2, 2012 without prior notice to us and must pay us par value for the
ARS within one day of the sale transaction settlement. While we expect to ultimately recover our
investments in the ARS at par, we may be unable to liquidate some or all of our ARS should we need
or desire to access the funds invested in those securities prior to redemption by the issuer or the
exercise of the ARS Rights. There is also a risk that our broker will default on its obligation to
purchase the ARS in the event that we exercise the ARS Rights.
Our products are complex and may contain undetected software or hardware errors that could lead to
an increase in our costs, reduce our net revenues or damage our reputation.
Our products are complex and may contain undetected software or hardware errors when first
introduced or as newer versions are released. We are also exposed to risks associated with latent
defects in existing products. From time to time, we have found errors in existing, new or enhanced
products. In addition, our products are frequently combined with other products, including
software, from other vendors, and these products often need to interface with existing networks,
each of which have different specifications and utilize multiple protocol standards and products
from other vendors. As a result, when problems occur, it may be difficult to identify the source of
the problem. The occurrence of hardware or software errors could adversely affect the sales of our
products, cause us to incur significant warranty and repair costs, divert the attention of our
engineering personnel from our product development efforts and cause significant customer relations
problems.
The migration of our customers toward new products could adversely affect our results of
operations.
As new or enhanced products are introduced, we must successfully manage the transition from
older products in order to minimize the effects of product inventories that may become excess and
obsolete, as well as ensure that sufficient supplies of new products can be delivered to meet
customer demand. Our failure to manage the transition to newer products in the future or to develop
and successfully introduce new products and product enhancements could adversely affect our
business or results of operations. When we introduce new products and product enhancements, we face
risks relating to product transitions, including risks relating to forecasting demand. Any such
adverse event could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results
of operations.
33
Table of Contents
Historically, the technology industry has developed higher performance ASICs, which create
chip-level solutions that replace selected board-level or box-level solutions at a significantly
lower average selling price. We have previously offered ASICs to customers for certain applications
that have effectively resulted in a lower-priced solution when compared to an adapter solution.
This transition to ASICs may also occur with respect to other current and future products. The
result of this transition may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or
results of operations. In the future, a similar adverse effect to our business could occur if there
were rapid shifts in customer purchases from our midrange server and storage solutions to products
for the small and medium-sized business market or if our customers shifted to lower-cost products
that could replace our adapter solutions.
Unanticipated changes in our tax provisions or adverse outcomes resulting from examination of our
income tax returns could adversely affect our results of operations.
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and various foreign jurisdictions. Our
effective income tax rates have recently been and could in the future be adversely affected by
changes in tax laws or interpretations of those tax laws, by changes in the mix of earnings in
countries with differing statutory tax rates, by discovery of new information in the course of our
tax return preparation process, or by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and
liabilities. Our effective income tax rates are also affected by intercompany transactions for
licenses, services, funding and other items. Given the increased global scope of our operations,
and the complexity of global tax and transfer pricing rules and regulations, it has become
increasingly difficult to estimate earnings within each tax jurisdiction. If actual earnings
within a tax jurisdiction differ materially from our estimates, we may not achieve our expected
effective tax rate. Additionally, our effective tax rate may be impacted by the tax effects of
acquisitions, newly enacted tax legislation, stock-based compensation and uncertain tax positions.
Finally, we are subject to the continuous examination of our income tax returns by the Internal
Revenue Service and other tax authorities which may result in the assessment of additional income
taxes. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to
determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. However, unanticipated outcomes from
these continuous examinations could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or
results of operations.
Environmental compliance costs could adversely affect our results of operations.
We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws concerning environmental
protection, including laws addressing the discharge of pollutants into the environment, the
management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the cleanup of contaminated sites, the
content of our products and the recycling, treatment and disposal of our products. In particular,
we face increasing complexity in our product design and procurement operations as we adjust to new
and future requirements relating to the chemical and material composition of our products, their
safe use, the energy consumption associated with those products and product take-back legislation
(i.e., legislation that makes producers of electrical goods financially responsible for specified
collection, recycling, treatment and disposal of past and future covered products). We could incur
substantial costs, our products could be restricted from entering certain jurisdictions, and we
could face other sanctions, if we were to violate or become liable under environmental laws or if
our products become non-compliant with environmental laws. Our potential exposure includes fines
and civil or criminal sanctions, third-party property damage or personal injury claims, and clean
up costs. Further, liability under some environmental laws relating to contaminated sites can be
imposed retroactively, on a joint and several basis, and without any finding of noncompliance or
fault. The amount and timing of costs under environmental laws are difficult to predict.
Because we have operations in foreign countries and depend on foreign customers and suppliers, we
are subject to international economic, currency, regulatory, political and other risks that could
harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
International revenues accounted for 54% and 52% of our net revenues for the nine months ended
December 27, 2009 and December 28, 2008, respectively. We expect that international revenues will
continue to account for a significant percentage of our net revenues for the foreseeable future. In
addition, we maintain operations in foreign countries and a significant portion of our inventory
purchases are from suppliers that are located outside the United States. As a result, we are
subject to several risks, which include:
| a greater difficulty of administering and managing our business globally; | ||
| compliance with multiple and potentially conflicting regulatory requirements, such as import or export requirements, tariffs and other barriers; | ||
| less effective intellectual property protections; |
34
Table of Contents
| potentially longer accounts receivable collection cycles; | ||
| currency fluctuations; | ||
| overlapping or differing tax structures; | ||
| potential restrictions on transferring funds between countries and difficulties associated with repatriating cash generated or held outside of the U.S. in a tax-efficient manner; | ||
| political and economic instability, including terrorism and war; and | ||
| general trade restrictions. |
Our international sales are invoiced in U.S. dollars and, accordingly, if the relative value
of the U.S. dollar in comparison to the currency of our foreign customers should increase, the
resulting effective price increase of our products to such foreign customers could result in
decreased sales. Any of the foregoing factors could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition or results of operations.
In addition, we and our customers are subject to various import and export regulations of the
United States government and other countries. Certain government export regulations apply to the
encryption or other features contained in some of our products. Changes in or violations of any
such import or export regulations could materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition or results of operations.
Moreover, in many foreign countries, particularly in those with developing economies, it is
common to engage in business practices that are prohibited by regulations applicable to us, such as
the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Although we implement policies and procedures designed to ensure
compliance with these laws, our employees, contractors and agents, as well as those companies to
which we outsource certain of our business operations, may take actions in violation of our
policies. Any such violation, even if prohibited by our policies, could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We may engage in mergers, acquisitions and strategic investments and these activities may adversely
affect our results of operations and stock price.
Our future growth may depend in part on our ability to identify and acquire complementary
businesses, technologies or product lines that are compatible with our existing business. Mergers
and acquisitions involve numerous risks, including:
| the failure of markets for the products of acquired companies to develop as expected; | ||
| uncertainties in identifying and pursuing target companies; | ||
| difficulties in the assimilation of the operations, technologies and products of the acquired companies; | ||
| the existence of unknown defects in acquired companies products or assets that may not be identified due to the inherent limitations involved in the due diligence process of an acquisition; | ||
| the diversion of managements attention from other business concerns; | ||
| risks associated with entering markets or conducting operations with which we have no or limited direct prior experience; | ||
| risks associated with assuming the legal obligations of acquired companies; | ||
| risks related to the effect that acquired companies internal control processes might have on our financial reporting and managements report on our internal control over financial reporting; | ||
| the potential loss of, or impairment of our relationships with, current customers or failure to retain the acquired companies customers; |
35
Table of Contents
| the potential loss of key employees of acquired companies; and | ||
| the incurrence of significant exit charges if products or technologies acquired in business combinations are unsuccessful. |
Further, we may never realize the perceived benefits of a business combination. Acquisitions
by us could negatively impact gross margins or dilute stockholders investment and cause us to
incur debt, contingent liabilities and amortization/impairment charges related to intangible
assets, all of which could materially and adversely affect our financial position or results of
operations. In addition, our effective tax rate for future periods could be negatively impacted by
mergers and acquisitions.
If we are unable to attract and retain key personnel, we may not be able to sustain or grow our
business.
Our future success largely depends on our key engineering, sales, marketing and executive
personnel, including highly skilled semiconductor design personnel and software developers, and in
particular, our Chief Executive Officer, H.K. Desai. If we lose the services of Mr. Desai or other
key personnel or fail to hire personnel for key positions, our business could be adversely
affected. We believe that the market for key personnel in the industries in which we compete is
highly competitive. In particular, periodically we have experienced difficulty in attracting and
retaining qualified engineers and other technical personnel and anticipate that competition for
such personnel will increase in the future. Our recent implementation of various cost saving
measures, as well as past reductions in force, could negatively impact employee morale and
potentially make attracting and retaining qualified employees more difficult in the future. As a
result, we may not be able to attract and retain key personnel with the skills and expertise
necessary to develop new products in the future or to manage our business, both in the United
States and abroad.
We have historically used stock options and other forms of stock-based compensation as key
components of our total employee compensation program in order to align employees interests with
the interests of our stockholders, encourage retention of key personnel, and provide competitive
compensation packages. Moreover, applicable stock exchange listing standards relating to obtaining
stockholder approval of equity compensation plans could make it more difficult or expensive for us
to grant stock-based awards to employees in the future, which may result in changes in our
stock-based compensation strategy. These and other developments relating to the provision of
stock-based compensation to employees could make it more difficult to attract, retain and motivate
key personnel.
We may experience difficulties in transitioning to smaller geometry process technologies.
We expect to continue to transition our semiconductor products to increasingly smaller line
width geometries. This transition requires us to modify the manufacturing processes for our
products and to redesign some products as well as standard cells and other integrated circuit
designs that we may use in multiple products. We periodically evaluate the benefits, on a
product-by-product basis, of migrating to smaller geometry process technologies. Currently, most of
our products include ASICs which are manufactured in 180, 130, 90 and 65 nanometer geometry
processes. In addition, we continually evaluate smaller geometries. In the past, we have
experienced some difficulties in shifting to smaller geometry process technologies or new
manufacturing processes, which resulted in reduced manufacturing yields, delays in product
deliveries and increased expenses. We may face similar difficulties, delays and expenses as we
continue to transition our products to smaller geometry processes.
Our proprietary rights may be inadequately protected and difficult to enforce.
In some jurisdictions, we have patent protection on certain aspects of our technology.
However, we rely primarily on trade secrets, trademarks, copyrights and contractual provisions to
protect our proprietary rights. There can be no assurance that these protections will be adequate
to protect our proprietary rights, that others will not independently develop or otherwise acquire
equivalent or superior technology, or that we can maintain such technology as trade secrets. There
also can be no assurance that any patents we possess will not be invalidated, circumvented or
challenged. We have taken steps in several jurisdictions to enforce our trademarks against third
parties. No assurances can be given that we will ultimately be successful in protecting our
trademarks. The laws of certain countries in which our products are or may be developed,
manufactured or sold, including various countries in Asia, may not protect our products and
intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States, or at all. If we
fail to protect our intellectual property rights, our business could be negatively impacted.
Disputes relating to claimed infringement of intellectual property rights may adversely affect our
business.
We have received notices of claimed infringement of intellectual property rights in the past
and have been involved in intellectual property litigation in the past. There can be no assurance
that third parties will not assert future claims of infringement of intellectual
36
Table of Contents
property rights
against us, or against customers who we are contractually obligated to indemnify, with respect to
existing and future products. In addition, individuals and groups are purchasing intellectual
property assets for the sole purpose of making claims of infringement and attempting to extract
settlements from companies such as ours. Although patent and intellectual property disputes may be
settled through licensing or similar arrangements, costs associated with these arrangements may be
substantial and the necessary licenses or similar arrangements may not be available to us on
satisfactory terms, or at all. As a result, we could be prevented from manufacturing and selling
some of our products. In addition, if we litigate these kinds of claims, the litigation could be
expensive, time consuming and could divert managements attention from other matters and there is
no guarantee we would prevail. Our business could suffer regardless of the outcome of the
litigation. Our supply of silicon chips and other components can also be interrupted by
intellectual property infringement claims against our suppliers.
If we fail to carefully manage the use of open source software in our products, we may be
required to license key portions of our products on a royalty-free basis or expose key parts of
source code.
Certain of our software may be derived from open source software that is generally made
available to the public by its authors and/or other third parties. Such open source software is
often made available to us under licenses, such as the GNU General Public License (GPL) which
impose certain obligations on us in the event we were to distribute derivative works of the open
source software. These obligations may require us to make source code for the derivative works
available to the public, and/or license such derivative works under a particular type of license,
rather than the forms of licenses customarily used to protect our intellectual property. In the
event the copyright holder of any open source software were to successfully establish in court that
we had not complied with the terms of a license for a particular work, we could be required to
release the source code of that work to the public and/or stop distribution of that work.
Our business could be materially adversely affected by changes in regulations or standards
regarding energy use of our products.
We continually seek ways to increase the energy efficiency of our products. Recent analyses
have estimated the amount of global carbon emissions that are due to information technology
products. As a result, governmental and non-governmental organizations have turned their attention
to development of regulations and standards to drive technological improvements and reduce such
amount of carbon emissions. There is a risk that the rush to development of these standards will
not fully address the complexity of the technology developed by the IT industry or will favor
certain technological approaches. Depending on the regulations or standards that are ultimately
adopted, compliance could adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial
condition.
Computer viruses and other forms of tampering with our computer systems or servers may disrupt our
operations and adversely affect our results of operations.
Despite our implementation of network security measures and anti-virus defenses, our servers
are vulnerable to computer viruses, break-ins and similar disruptions from unauthorized tampering
with our computer systems. Any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations or financial condition.
Our facilities and the facilities of our suppliers and customers are located in regions that are
subject to natural disasters.
Our California facilities, including our principal executive offices, our principal design
facilities and our critical business operations, are located near major earthquake faults. We are
not specifically insured for earthquakes or other natural disasters. Any personal injury or damage
to the facilities as a result of such occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations or financial condition. Additionally, we have operations, suppliers
and customers in regions which have historically experienced natural disasters. Any earthquake or
other natural disaster, including a hurricane, tsunami or fire, affecting any of these regions
could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
37
Table of Contents
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
In November 2008, our Board of Directors approved a new program to repurchase up to an
additional $300 million of our common stock over a two-year period. Set forth below is information
regarding our stock repurchases made during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 under this program.
Total Number of | Approximate Dollar | |||||||||||||||
Shares Purchased | Value of Shares that | |||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Average Price | as Part of Publicly | May Yet be Purchased | |||||||||||||
Period | Shares Purchased | Paid per Share | Announced Plans | Under the Plan | ||||||||||||
September 28, 2009 October 25, 2009 |
1,111,600 | $ | 17.99 | 1,111,600 | $ | 180,999,000 | ||||||||||
October 26, 2009 November 22, 2009 |
573,700 | $ | 18.44 | 573,700 | $ | 170,419,000 | ||||||||||
November 23, 2009 December 27, 2009 |
494,500 | $ | 18.55 | 494,500 | $ | 161,245,000 | ||||||||||
Total |
2,179,800 | $ | 18.24 | 2,179,800 | $ | 161,245,000 | ||||||||||
We previously purchased 7.6 million shares under the November 2008 program for an aggregate
purchase price of $99.0 million.
38
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits
Exhibit No. | ||
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
39
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
QLOGIC CORPORATION |
||||
By: | /s/ H.K. DESAI | |||
H.K. Desai | ||||
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
||||
By: | /s/ Simon Biddiscombe | |||
Simon Biddiscombe | ||||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
||||
Date: February 2, 2010
40
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | ||
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
41