Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
8-K - FORM 8-K - BLACK BOX CORP | l38720e8vk.htm |
EX-99.5 - EX-99.5 - BLACK BOX CORP | l38720exv99w5.htm |
EX-99.3 - EX-99.3 - BLACK BOX CORP | l38720exv99w3.htm |
EX-99.2 - EX-99.2 - BLACK BOX CORP | l38720exv99w2.htm |
EX-99.4 - EX-99.4 - BLACK BOX CORP | l38720exv99w4.htm |
Exhibit 99.1
Case 2:06-cv-01531-JFC Document 105 Filed 01/22/10 Page 1 of 12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
In re BLACK BOX CORPORATION |
) | |||
DERIVATIVE LITIGATION |
) | No. 2:06-CV-01531 JFC | ||
) | ||||
This Document Relates to: All Actions |
) | |||
) | ||||
) | ||||
JOINT MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY AND FINAL APPROVAL
OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
The Parties1 hereby move the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23.1 for an
order preliminarily approving the proposed settlement reached in the above-captioned action (the
Action) brought derivatively for and on behalf of Nominal Defendant Black Box Corporation (Black
Box or the Company) against the Defendants and, after notice and hearing, for final approval of
the Settlement.
1. The Parties have agreed on the Settlement, including the settlement of all claims that John
L. Anderson and Steve Leisy (collectively, the Plaintiffs) have brought derivatively against the
Defendants.
2. Black Box and its former chief executive officer, Defendant Frederick C. Young (Young),
also have agreed to settle claims between them. The Young claims are the basis of a lawsuit Young
filed against Black Box in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania (the CCP
Action). Black Boxs claims against Young and the Young
1 Except as otherwise expressly provided below or
as the context otherwise requires, all capitalized terms used in this Joint
Motion for Preliminary and Final Approval of Proposed Settlement (the Joint
Motion) shall have the meanings and/or definitions given in the Stipulation of
Compromise and Settlement dated January 22, 2010 (the Stipulation) entered
into by and among the Parties and the Insurers, which is attached to this Joint
Motion as Exhibit A. |
Case 2:06-cv-01531-JFC Document 105 Filed 01/22/10 Page 2 of 12
claims against Black Box would have been asserted in this Action if it had proceeded to and
beyond the responsive pleading or motion stage.
3. All terms, definitions, provisions, reservations, and conditions of such Settlement are
more particularly set forth in the Stipulation which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. To the
extent that there may be any conflict between the terms, definitions, provisions, reservations, and
conditions set forth in this Joint Motion and those set forth in the Stipulation, the terms,
definitions, provisions, reservations, and conditions of the Stipulation shall govern.
4. The purposes and intent of all parties to this Joint Motion are that, subject to the final
approval of the Court, (i) the Action, the CCP Action, and the Released Claims shall be finally and
fully compromised, settled, and released; and (ii) the Action and the CCP Action shall be dismissed
with prejudice, as to all Parties, upon and subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation.
The Released Claims include all claims in the Action, all claims in the CCP Action, all claims
between the Company and Frederick C. Young, all claims between or among any of the Defendants, and
all claims between any of the Parties and the Insurers.
5. In accordance with the provisions of the Stipulation, the Parties hereby move the Court to
confirm the Settlement Hearing scheduled for March 19, 2010, at which time (a) the Parties will
seek final approval of the terms of the Settlement as fair, reasonable, and adequate, and in the
best interests of, Black Box and Current Black Box Stockholders; and (b) Plaintiffs Counsel will
seek an award of attorneys fees and expenses in the amount of $1,600,000 (the Fee Award), to be
paid by Black Box and which is unopposed by Defendants, to be awarded to Plaintiffs Counsel as
fair and reasonable in light of the substantial benefits conferred on Black Box and Current Black
Box Stockholders by the Settlement.
2
Case
2:06-cv-01531-JFC Document 105 Filed 01/22/10 Page 3 of 12
6. The Mediating Parties agree and represent that the Stipulation, the Settlement, and the Fee
Award were extensively negotiated at arms-length in good faith by the Mediating Parties with the
assistance of a very experienced mediator of complex issues, and reflect an agreement that was
reached voluntarily among all the Parties after consultation with experienced, sophisticated legal
counsel.
7. The Parties suggest that the factors favoring the Settlement on the terms proposed in the
Stipulation include the following:
a. the uncertainty of the legal issues underlying the allegations
in the Action;
b. the assurance that Black Box and Current Black Box Stockholders
obtained benefits regardless of the outcome of further litigation;
c. the economy of costs/exposure reduction for the benefit of the
Parties;
d. the costs of continued litigation; and
e. the prevailing consideration in all compromises and settlements
that the Parties weighed the advantages and benefits of settlement against the
risks of loss.
8. The Parties further represent to the Court that while the Defendants have denied, and
continue to deny, the allegations in the Action, and Young and Black Box deny and continue to deny
their claims against each other, the Stipulation, the Settlement, and the consideration therefor
are fair, reasonable, and adequate, and in the best interests of, Black Box and Current Black Box
Stockholders, considering:
a. the complexity, expense, and likely duration of the litigation
with respect to the further participation of the Parties;
b. the state of the proceedings and the amount of discovery
completed;
c. the immediate benefits to Black Box and Current Black Box
Stockholders arising out of the Settlement; and
d. the concurrences of counsel for the Parties and the Insurers as
reflected in their respective signatures to this Joint Motion.
3
Case
2:06-cv-01531-JFC Document 105 Filed 01/22/10 Page 4 of 12
9. Plaintiffs Counsel represent to the Court that, in their opinion, the Settlement as
proposed is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and in the best interests of, Black Box and Current
Black Box Stockholders, especially in view of the uncertainties and vagaries of further litigation,
the substantial and immediate benefits obtained for the Company and for Current Black Box
Stockholders, and the nature of the relief sought.
10. In accordance with the provisions of the Stipulation, Counsel present for the approval of
the Court the following proposed plan:
a. Following the Courts determination that the Settlement is
preliminarily approved and entry of the Preliminary Approval order, in
substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit B, Notice to all Current
Black Box Stockholders, substantially in the form attached to this Joint Motion
as Exhibit C, shall be disseminated by release one time on the national edition
of Business Wire and the Notice and the Stipulation will be exhibits to a
Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed by Black Box, informing Current Black
Box Stockholders of their right to object to the terms of the proposed
Settlement and to be heard on their objections at the Settlement Hearing to be
conducted at a prescribed time and place and in a prescribed manner.
b. The Settlement Hearing shall be conducted in such manner as to
assure full compliance with applicable considerations of due process of law and
the provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
11. To assure that Current Black Box Stockholders are fully informed of (a) the proposed
Settlement, (b) their rights to review the proposed Settlement documents, (c) their right to object
to the proposed Settlement, and (d) the means whereby they may make their objections and be heard
thereon at the Settlement Hearing to be held by the Court at a designated time and place, the
Parties respectfully request that the Notice be approved by the Court and published, as provided in
the Stipulation, in accordance with due process and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Black
Box shall be responsible for publishing the Notice and all costs associated therewith in accordance
with the terms of the Stipulation.
4
Case
2:06-cv-01531-JFC Document 105 Filed 01/22/10 Page 5 of 12
12. To facilitate the proposed Settlement and in the interests of judicial economy, the
Parties request that the commencement and/or prosecution of any and all related actions and
proceedings asserting any Released Claims against any Released Parties (including discovery) by, on
behalf of, or through any Current Black Box Stockholders in their capacity as such (excluding,
however, those proceedings within the Action necessary to obtain final approval of the Settlement
embodied in the Stipulation), should be enjoined and stayed during the pendency of these Settlement
proceedings and until further ordered by this Court.
13. As described in the Stipulation, the Parties agree that, in the event of termination of
the Stipulation, the Action shall revert to its status before the filing of the Stipulation as if
related orders and papers and the efforts leading to the Stipulation had not been entered,
prepared, or taken.
14. The Parties agree that the Court shall retain jurisdiction with respect to the
implementation and enforcement of the terms of the Stipulation and Settlement, and all Parties
submit to the jurisdiction of the Court for the sole purpose of implementing and enforcing the
Settlement embodied in the Stipulation. By submitting to the jurisdiction of the Court for the
limited purpose of this Settlement, the Defendants do not waive, and shall not be deemed to have
waived, any jurisdictional defenses that were otherwise available prior to the execution of the
Stipulation.
WHEREFORE, THE PARTIES REQUEST:
A. | That the Court review the proposed Stipulation and that the Stipulation and the
Settlement contained therein be preliminarily approved by the Court as fair,
reasonable, and adequate, and in the best interests of, Black Box and Current Black Box
Stockholders, and entered into in good faith after consultation with experienced,
sophisticated legal counsel by the form of order attached to this Joint Motion as
Exhibit B; |
||
B. | That the Court approve the form of Notice to Current Black Box Stockholders
attached to this Joint Motion as Exhibit C, and order its dissemination to Current |
5
Case
2:06-cv-01531-JFC Document 105 Filed 01/22/10 Page 6 of 12
Black Box Stockholders by the release one time on the national edition of Business
Wire and by filing the Notice and the Stipulation as exhibits to a Current Report on
Form 8-K to be filed by Black Box with the SEC, so that the Court may obtain and
consider comments and objections of Current Black Box Stockholders, if any,
regarding the Stipulation and the Settlement set forth therein and consider their
fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy, and whether they are in the best interests
of Black Box and Current Black Box Stockholders; |
|||
C. | That the Court confirm the Settlement Hearing scheduled for March 19, 2010, at
which time (a) the Parties will seek final approval of the terms of the Settlement, as
defined in the Stipulation, and the Court will consider comments/objections regarding
the Stipulation and the proposed Settlement set forth therein, and will consider their
fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy, and whether they are in the best interests of,
Black Box and Current Black Box Stockholders, under the provisions of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure, and (b) Plaintiffs Counsel will seek approval of the Fee Award to
be paid by Black Box, which is unopposed by Defendants, as fair and reasonable in light
of the substantial benefits conferred on the Company and Current Black Box
Stockholders. Prior to the scheduled Settlement Hearing, Plaintiffs Counsel and Black
Box counsel will file memoranda of law supporting the approval of the terms of the
Settlement and approval of the Fee Award; |
||
D. | That the Court enjoin and stay the commencement and/or prosecution of any and
all actions and proceedings relating to the Action (including discovery) by, on behalf
of, or through any Current Black Box Stockholder against any of the Defendants
(excluding, however, those proceedings within the Action necessary to obtain final
approval of the Settlement embodied in the Stipulation), during the pendency of this
Settlement proceeding and until further ordered by this Court; |
||
E. | Should the Stipulation and the Settlement set forth therein not receive this
Courts final approval, should final approval be reversed on appeal, or should the
Stipulation and the Settlement set forth therein otherwise fail to become effective,
the Parties shall be returned for all purposes to the status that existed just prior to
the execution and filing of the Stipulation with the Court, and all claims and
defenses, including the right to assert jurisdictional defenses, shall not be deemed to
be waived, and the Stipulation, as well as any negotiations, proceedings, documents
prepared and statements made in connection therewith, shall have no further force and
effect with respect to the Parties and shall not be used in the Action or in any other
proceeding for any purpose, and any judgment or order entered by the Court in
accordance with the terms of the Stipulation shall be treated as vacated, nunc pro
tunc; |
||
F. | That any Current Black Box Stockholder who timely and properly files the
appropriate documentation or an objection to the Stipulation and the proposed
Settlement set forth therein, as provided in the Notice, may appear at the Settlement
Hearing and articulate why the Stipulation and the proposed Settlement set forth
therein should not be approved as fair, reasonable, and |
6
Case
2:06-cv-01531-JFC Document 105 Filed 01/22/10 Page 7 of 12
adequate, and in the best interests of, Black Box and Current Black Box
Stockholders; |
|||
G. | That, in due course, and after appropriate notice and hearing(s), the Court
enter the Order of Dismissal and Judgment, approving the Settlement, and all terms
thereof as provided in the Stipulation, and dismissing with prejudice the Action as set
forth in the Stipulation, under the terms and conditions of the Stipulation, against
the Defendants, in the form of order attached to this Joint Motion as Exhibit D; |
||
H. | That the Court maintain continuing jurisdiction solely for purposes of the
Settlement proceedings to assure the effectuation thereof for the benefit of the
Settlement; and |
||
I. | For such other relief that this Court deems appropriate. |
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused the Joint Motion to be
submitted, by their
duly authorized attorneys.
Respectfully Submitted, |
||||
DATED: January 22, 2010 | /s/ Michael J. Hynes | |||
BARROWAY TOPAZ KESSLER | ||||
MELTZER & CHECK LLP Eric L. Zagar Michael J. Hynes Ligaya T. Hernandez 280 King of Prussia Road Radnor, PA 19087 Telephone: (610) 667-7706 |
||||
DATED: January 22, 2010 | /s/ Robert B. Weiser | |||
THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C | ||||
Robert B. Weiser Brett D. Stecker Jeffrey J. Ciarlanto 121 N. Wayne Avenue, Suite 100 Wayne, PA 19107 Telephone: (610) 225-2677 Alfred G. Yates, Jr. 519 Allegheny Building |
7
Case
2:06-cv-01531-JFC Document 105 Filed 01/22/10 Page 8 of 12
429 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Telephone: (412) 3915164 Attorneys for Plaintiffs |
||||
DATED: January 22, 2010 | /s/ Thomas R. Johnson | |||
K&L GATES LLP | ||||
David A. Brownlee Thomas R. Johnson Patrick J. McElhinny Henry W. Oliver Building 535 Smithfield Street Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Telephone: (412) 3556500 Attorneys for Nominal Defendant Black Box Corporation |
||||
DATED: January 22, 2010 | /s/ Jeffrey T. Gilbert | |||
REED SMITH LLP | ||||
Jeffrey T. Gilbert 10 South Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 606067507 Telephone: (312) 2076489 W. Thomas McGough, Jr. Jason E. Hazlewood 435 Sixth Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Telephone: (412) 2883088 Attorneys for Defendant Frederick C. Young |
||||
DATED: January 22, 2010 | /s/ Arthur H. Stroyd, Jr. | |||
DEL SOLE CAVANAUGH STROYD LLC | ||||
Arthur H. Stroyd, Jr. The Waterfront Building Suite 300 200 First Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Telephone: (412) 2612172 Attorneys for Defendant Ronald D. Fisher |
8
Case
2:06-cv-01531-JFC Document 105 Filed 01/22/10 Page 9 of 12
DATED: January 22, 2010 | /s/ Robert M. Linn | |||
COHEN & GRIGSBY, P.C. | ||||
Richard R. Nelson II Robert M. Linn 625 Liberty Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 152223152 Telephone: (412) 2974900 Attorneys for Defendants William F. Andrews and Thomas G. Greig |
||||
DATED: January 22, 2010 | /s/ Thomas S. Jones | |||
JONES DAY | ||||
Paul M. Pohl Thomas S. Jones One Mellon Center 500 Grant Street, 31st Floor Pittsburgh, PA 152192502 Telephone: (412) 3947900 Attorneys for Defendant Jeffery M. Boetticher |
||||
DATED: January 22, 2010 | /s/ Jay D. Marinstein | |||
FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP | ||||
Jay D. Marinstein Carl J. Rychcik Dominion Tower 625 Liberty Avenue29th Floor Pittsburgh, PA 12223115 Telephone: (412) 3945526 Attorneys for Defendant Kathleen Bullions |
9
Case
2:06-cv-01531-JFC Document 105 Filed 01/22/10 Page 10 of 12
DATED: January 22, 2010 | /s/ James C. Dugan | |||
WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP | ||||
Martin J. Weinstein James C. Dugan 1875 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 200061238 BLUMLING & GUSKY, LLP Rochelle R. Koerbel 1200 Koppers Building Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Telephone: (412) 2272500 Attorneys for Defendant Anna M. Baird |
||||
DATED: January 22, 2010 | /s/ William M. Wycoff | |||
THORP REED & ARMSTRONG | ||||
William M. Wycoff One Oxford Centre 301 Grant Street 14th Floor Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Telephone: (412) 3947782 Attorneys for Defendants Francis Wertheimber and Roger E. M. Croft |
10
Case
2:06-cv-01531-JFC Document 105 Filed 01/22/10 Page 11 of 12
DATED: January 22, 2010 | /s/ Anthony J. Basinski | |||
PIETRAGALLO GORDON ALFANO BOSICK & | ||||
RASPANTI, LLP William Pietragallo, II Anthony J. Basinski One Oxford Centre 38th Floor Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Telephone: (412) 2631818 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP Bruce Baird David B. H. Martin Virginia M. Rosado Desilets Alexia DePottere Smith 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 200042401 Telephone: (202) 6625122 Attorneys for Defendant William R. Newlin |
11
Case
2:06-cv-01531-JFC Document 105 Filed 01/22/10 Page 12 of 12
DATED: January 22, 2010 | /s/ George J. Skelly | |||
NIXON PEABODY LLP | ||||
George J. Skelly 100 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110 Telephone: (617) 345-1220 ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC Daniel B. McLane U.S. Steel Tower 600 Grant Street, 44th Floor Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Telephone: (412) 566-1984 Attorneys for Defendant Brian D. Young |
||||
DATED: January 22, 2010 | /s/ William F. Ward | |||
WARD McGOUGH, LLC | ||||
William F. Ward Koppers Building 436 Seventh Avenue - Suite 2312 Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Telephone: (412) 395-1245 Attorneys for Defendant Michael McAndrew |
||||
12