Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-31 - SOLITRON DEVICES INC | v171268_ex31.htm |
EX-32 - SOLITRON DEVICES INC | v171268_ex32.htm |
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
one)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
quarterly period ended November 30, 2009
or
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
transition period from _______ to _______
Commission
File No. 1-4978
SOLITRON DEVICES,
INC.
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
|
22-1684144
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
3301 Electronics Way, West Palm Beach,
Florida
|
33407
|
(Address
of Principal Executive
Offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(561)
848-4311
(Registrant’s
Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,”
and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one)
Large accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
Smaller reporting company x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
The
number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding
as of January 12, 2010 was 2,263,775.
SOLITRON
DEVICES, INC.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Page No.
|
|||
PART 1 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |||
Item
|
1.
|
Financial
Statements (unaudited)
|
|
Condensed
Balance Sheets
|
3
|
||
As
of November 30, 2009 and February 28, 2009
|
|||
Condensed
Statements of Income
|
4
|
||
For
the Three and Nine months ended November 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|||
Condensed
Statements of Cash Flows
|
5
|
||
For
the Nine months ended November 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|||
Notes
to Condensed Financial Statements
|
6-11
|
||
Item
|
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
|
|
Results
of Operations
|
12-15
|
||
Item
|
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
15-16
|
Item
|
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
17
|
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
|
|||
Item
|
6.
|
Exhibits
|
17
|
Signatures
|
18
|
2
PART I – FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
ITEM
1.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
SOLITRON DEVICES,
INC.
CONDENSED BALANCE
SHEETS
(Unaudited,
in thousands)
November
30, 2009
|
Feb 28,
2009
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS :
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 375 | $ | 440 | ||||
Treasury
bills
|
5,462 | 5,113 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
797 | 871 | ||||||
Inventories,
net
|
2,674 | 2,569 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
111 | 139 | ||||||
TOTAL
CURRENT ASSETS
|
9,419 | 9,132 | ||||||
PROPERTY,
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net
|
556 | 581 | ||||||
OTHER
ASSETS
|
52 | 52 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 10,027 | $ | 9,765 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable – Post-petition
|
$ | 345 | $ | 443 | ||||
Accounts
payable – Pre-petition, current portion
|
1,065 | 1,086 | ||||||
Customer
deposits
|
72 | 61 | ||||||
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
370 | 570 | ||||||
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
1,852 | 2,160 | ||||||
LONG
TERM LIABILITIES, net of current portion
|
||||||||
Accrual
for environmental claims
|
148 | 158 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
|
2,000 | 2,318 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS
& CONTINGENCIES
|
||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $.01 par value, authorized 500,000 shares, none
issued
|
-0- | -0- | ||||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value, authorized 10,000,000 shares,
2,263,775
|
||||||||
shares
issued and outstanding, net of 173,287 shares of treasury
stock
|
23 | 23 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
2,733 | 2,733 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
5,271 | 4,691 | ||||||
TOTAL
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
8,027 | 7,447 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
$ | 10,027 | $ | 9,765 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
3
SOLITRON DEVICES,
INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF
INCOME
THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED
NOVEMBER 30,
(Unaudited,
in thousands except for share and per share amounts)
Three months
|
Nine Months
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
NET
SALES
|
$ | 1,989 | $ | 2,104 | $ | 5,747 | $ | 6,344 | ||||||||
Cost
of Sales
|
1,563 | 1,638 | 4,428 | 4,910 | ||||||||||||
Gross
Profit
|
426 | 466 | 1,319 | 1,434 | ||||||||||||
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
|
251 | 357 | 763 | 874 | ||||||||||||
Operating
Income
|
175 | 109 | 556 | 560 | ||||||||||||
OTHER
INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
Other
Income, Net
|
- | - | 9 | - | ||||||||||||
Interest
Income
|
4 | 27 | 15 | 62 | ||||||||||||
Interest
Expense
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Other
Income, Net
|
4 | 27 | 24 | 62 | ||||||||||||
Net
Income
|
$ | 179 | $ | 136 | $ | 580 | $ | 622 | ||||||||
NET
INCOME PER SHARE :
Basic
|
$ | .08 | $ | .06 | $ | .26 | $ | .27 | ||||||||
: Diluted
|
$ | .07 | $ | .05 | $ | .24 | $ | .25 | ||||||||
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE NUMBER OF
|
||||||||||||||||
SHARES
OUTSTANDING : Basic
|
2,263,775 | 2,263,427 | 2,263,775 | 2,263,078 | ||||||||||||
:
Diluted
|
2,453,356 | 2,470,288 | 2,453,107 | 2,474,728 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
4
SOLITRON DEVICES,
INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS
NINE MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER
30,
(Unaudited,
in thousands)
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net
Income
|
$ | 580 | $ | 622 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
148 | 147 | ||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
(Increase)
Decrease in:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
74 | (71 | ) | |||||
Inventories
|
(105 | ) | 544 | |||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
28 | (10 | ) | |||||
Other
non-current assets
|
- | (6 | ) | |||||
Increase
(Decrease) in:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable – Post-petition
|
(98 | ) | (175 | ) | ||||
Accounts
payable – Pre-petition
|
(21 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||
Customer
deposits
|
11 | (221 | ) | |||||
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
(200 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
(10 | ) | - | |||||
NET
CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
407 | 759 | ||||||
CASH
FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Investment
in treasury bills
|
(349 | ) | (164 | ) | ||||
Purchases
of property, plant and equipment
|
(123 | ) | (602 | ) | ||||
NET
CASH (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
(472 | ) | (766 | ) | ||||
NET
INCREASE/(DECREASE) IN CASH
|
(65 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||
CASH
AT THE BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
440 | 75 | ||||||
CASH
AT THE END OF PERIOD
|
$ | 375 | $ | 68 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
5
SOLITRON
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1.
|
GENERAL AND
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES:
|
GENERAL:
The
financial information included herein is unaudited; however, such information
reflects all adjustments (consisting primarily of normal recurring adjustments),
which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the
results for the interim period.
The
accompanying unaudited interim condensed financial statements have been prepared
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
for reporting on Form 10-Q. Pursuant to such rules and regulations,
certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States have been condensed or omitted.
The
information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in
conjunction with the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
appearing in the Solitron Devices, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended February 28, 2009.
The
results of operations for the three-month period ended November 30, 2009 are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year ending
February 28, 2010.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES:
Cash
Cash
includes demand deposits and money market accounts. The Company has
$375,000 in cash deposits which is $125,000 over the $250,000 limit for FDIC
insurance.
Investment in Treasury
Bills
During
the first quarter of last fiscal year, the Company’s management decided to
reclassify its investment in treasury bills from cash and cash equivalents and
report it separately as “Investment in Treasury Bills”. Investment in Treasury
Bills includes treasury bills with maturities of one year or less and is stated
at market value.
Accounts
Receivable
The
Company extends unsecured credit to its customers in the ordinary course of
business. The Company’s standard credit terms are net 15 days. The
associated credit risk is mitigated by performing credit checks and actively
pursuing past due accounts. An allowance for doubtful accounts has
been established. The allowance amount was $2,000 as of November 30,
2009 and $7,000 as of February 28, 2009. The Company has not had a
bad debt in the past three years.
Shipping and
Handling
Shipping
and handling costs billed to customers are recorded in net
sales. Shipping costs incurred by the Company are recorded in cost of
sales.
Inventories
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using
the “first-in, first-out” (FIFO) method. The Company buys raw
material only to fill customer orders. Excess raw material is created
only when a vendor imposes a minimum buy in excess of actual
requirements. Such excess material will usually be utilized to meet
the requirements of the customer’s subsequent orders. If excess
material is not utilized after two fiscal years it is fully
reserved. Any inventory item once designated as reserved is carried
at zero value in all subsequent valuation activities.
The
Company’s inventory valuation policy is as follows:
Raw
material /Work in process:
|
All
material purchased, processed and/or used in the last two fiscal years is
valued at the lower of its acquisition cost or market. All
material not purchased/used in the last two fiscal years is fully reserved
for.
|
6
SOLITRON
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Finished
goods:
|
All
finished goods with firm orders for later delivery are valued (material
and overhead) at the lower of cost or market. All finished
goods with no orders are fully reserved.
|
Direct
labor costs:
|
Direct
labor costs are allocated to finished goods and work in process inventory
based on engineering estimates of the amount of man hours required from
the different direct labor departments to bring each device to its
particular level of
completion.
|
Stock Based
Compensation
In
December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No.
148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, and
amendment of FASB Statement No. 123”. This statement amends SFAS No.
123, to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the
fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation. This statement also amends the disclosure requirements
of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim
financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation and the effect of the method used on reported
results. The Company has prepared its interim financial statements
for the quarters ended November 30, 2009 and November 30, 2008 in accordance
with SFAS No. 148.
During
the quarters ended November 30, 2009 and November 30, 2008, the Company did not
issue any stock-based compensation to its employees or directors.
2.
|
ENVIRONMENTAL
REGULATION:
|
While the
Company believes that it has the environmental permits necessary to conduct its
business and that its operations conform to present environmental regulations,
increased public attention has been focused on the environmental impact of
semiconductor manufacturing operations. The Company, in the conduct
of its manufacturing operations, has handled and does handle materials that are
considered hazardous, toxic or volatile under federal, state and local laws and,
therefore, is subject to regulations related to their use, storage, discharge
and disposal. No assurance can be made that the risk of accidental
release of such materials can be completely eliminated. In the event
of a violation of environmental laws, the Company could be held liable for
damages and the costs of remediation. In addition, the Company, along with the
rest of the semiconductor industry, is subject to variable interpretations and
governmental priorities concerning environmental laws and
regulations. Environmental statutes have been interpreted to provide
for joint and several liability and strict liability regardless of actual
fault. There can be no assurance that the Company will not be
required to incur costs to comply with, or that the operations, business or
financial condition of the Company will not be materially adversely affected by
current or future environmental laws or regulations.
3.
|
ENVIRONMENTAL
LIABILITIES:
|
The Company entered into an Ability to
Pay Multi-Site Settlement Agreement with the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (“USEPA”), effective February 24, 2006 (“Settlement
Agreement”), to resolve the Company’s alleged liability to USEPA at the
following sites: Solitron Microwave Superfund Site, Port Salerno,
Florida (“Port Salerno Site”); Petroleum Products Corporation Superfund Site,
Pembroke Park, Florida; Casmalia Resources Superfund Site, Santa Barbara,
California (“Casmalia Site”); Solitron Devices Site, Riviera Beach, Florida (the
“Riviera Beach Site”); and City Industries Superfund Site, Orlando, Florida
(collectively, the “Sites”). The Settlement Agreement required the
Company to pay to USEPA the sum of $74,000 by February 24, 2008; the Company
paid the entire sum of $74,000 to USEPA on February 27, 2006. In addition, the
Company is required to pay to USEPA the sum of $10,000 or 5% of Solitron’s net
after-tax income over the first $500,000, if any, whichever is greater, for each
year from fiscal years 2009-2013. For payment to USEPA to be above
$10,000 for any of these five years, the Company’s net income must exceed
$700,000 for such year, which has happened in fiscal year 2001, fiscal year
2006, fiscal year 2008 and fiscal year 2009. In February 2009, the
Company paid $10,000 to USEPA for fiscal year 2009 based on preliminary
net income projections. In June 2009, the Company paid an additional $15,000
pursuant to its obligations under the Settlement Agreement. The Company accrued
$40,000 for its remaining minimum obligations under the Settlement
Agreement. This amount is reflected in “Accrual for environmental
claims” on the Company’s balance sheets at November 30, 2009, net
of the $10,000 current portion.
7
SOLITRON
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
In
consideration of the payments made by the Company under the Settlement
Agreement, USEPA agreed not to sue or take any administrative action against the
Company with regard to any of the Sites. The Company has also been
notified by a group of alleged responsible parties formed at the Casmalia Site
(“Casmalia PRP Group”) that, based on their review and lack of objection to the
Settlement Agreement, the Casmalia PRP Group does not anticipate pursuing the
Company for cost recovery at the Casmalia site.
On
October 21, 1993, a Consent Final Judgment was entered into between the Company
and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (“FDEP”) in the Circuit
Court of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida in and for Martin County,
Florida, in Case No. 91-1232 CA (the “Consent Final Judgment”). The
Consent Final Judgment required the Company to remediate the Port Salerno and
Riviera Beach Sites, make monthly payments to escrow accounts for each Site
until the sale of the Sites to fund the remediation work, take all reasonable
steps to sell the two Sites and, upon the sale of the Sites, apply the net
proceeds from the sales to fund the remediation work. Both Sites have
been sold pursuant to purchase agreements approved by FDEP.
Prior to
the sale of the Port Salerno Site and Riviera Beach Site, USEPA took over from
FDEP as the lead regulatory agency for the remediation of the
Sites. At the closing of the sale of each Site, the net
proceeds of sale were distributed to USEPA and/or FDEP or other parties, as
directed by the agencies. In addition, upon the sale of the Riviera
Beach Site, the Riviera Beach Escrow Account was transferred to USEPA, as
directed by the agencies. The current balance in the Port Salerno
Escrow Account is approximately $58,000. At present, work at the Port
Salerno Site is being performed by USEPA. Work at the Riviera Beach
Site is being performed by Honeywell, Inc. (“Honeywell”), pursuant to an
Administrative Order on Consent entered into between Honeywell and
USEPA. The Company has been notified by FDEP that the successful
performance of remediation work in accordance with the Consent Final Judgment
standards by USEPA at the Port Salerno Site and by Honeywell at the Riviera
Beach Site will be construed by FDEP as discharging the Company’s remediation
obligations under the Consent Final Judgment.
There
remains a possibility that FDEP will determine at some time in the future that
the final remedy approved by USEPA and implemented at either, or both of, the
Port Salerno Site and Riviera Beach Site does not meet the State cleanup
requirements imposed by the Consent Final Judgment. If such a final
determination is made by FDEP, there is a possibility that FDEP will require the
Company to implement additional remedial action at either, or both of, the Port
Salerno Site and Riviera Beach Site.
By letter
dated November 16, 2006, FDEP notified the Company that FDEP has unreimbursed
expenses associated with the Port Salerno Site and Riviera Beach Site of
$214,800. FDEP further notified the Company that FDEP required the
Company to resume payments under the Consent Final Judgment to ensure that there
are adequate funds to cover FDEP’s unreimbursed expenses and the Company’s
residual liability under the Consent Final Judgment. During a follow
up telephone conversation with the Company’s attorney, FDEP advised the Company
that FDEP will prepare a justification for the asserted unreimbursed
expenses. Upon receipt of the cost reimbursement package, the Company
is required to transfer $55,000.00 from the Port Salerno Escrow Account to FDEP
as partial payment for FDEP’s unreimbursed expenses that are otherwise
recoverable under the Consent Final Judgment. FDEP further stated,
during the telephone conversation, that FDEP will work with the Company to
establish a reduced payment schedule for the Company to resume under the Consent
Final Judgment based on an appropriate showing by the Company of financial
hardship. The Company is currently awaiting receipt of FDEP’s cost
reimbursement package. Upon receipt of that documentation, the
Company will be required to provide a recommendation to FDEP for resumption of
payments to FDEP under the Consent Final Judgment based on the Company’s present
ability to pay.
8
SOLITRON
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
On August
7, 2002, the Company received a Request for Information from the State of New
York Department of Environmental Conservation (“NYDEC”), seeking information on
whether the Company had disposed of certain wastes at the Clarkstown Landfill
Site located in the Town of Clarkstown, Rockland County, New York (The
Clarkstown Landfill Site”). By letter dated August 29, 2002, the
Company responded to the Request for Information and advised NYDEC that the
Company’s former Tappan, New York facility had closed in the mid-1980’s, prior
to the initiation of the Company’s bankruptcy proceedings described
below. The Company contends that, to the extent that NYDEC has a
claim against the Company as a result of the Company’s alleged disposal of
wastes at the Clarkstown Landfill Site prior to the closing of the Company’s
former Tappan facility in the mid-1980’s, the claim was discharged in bankruptcy
as a result of the Bankruptcy Court’s August 1993 Order. At NYDEC’s
request, the Company entered into a revised Tolling Agreement with NYDEC on
December 28, 2009, which provides for the tolling of applicable statutes of
limitation through the earlier of November 19, 2010, or the date the State
institutes a suit against the Company for any claims associated with the
Clarkstown Landfill Site. It is not known at this time whether NYDEC
will pursue a claim against the Company in connection with the Clarkstown
Landfill Site. As of the date of this filing, no such claim has been
made.
4. EARNINGS PER
SHARE:
The
shares used in the computation of the Company’s basic and diluted earnings per
common share were as follows:
For the three months ended
November 30,
|
For the nine months ended
November 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
2,263,775 | 2,263,427 | 2,263,775 | 2,263,078 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive
effect of employee stock options
|
189,581 | 206,861 | 189,332 | 211,650 | ||||||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding, assuming dilution
|
2,453,356 | 2,470,288 | 2,453,107 | 2,474,728 |
Weighted
average common shares outstanding, assuming dilution, include the incremental
shares that would be issued upon the assumed exercise of stock
options. For the three month periods ended November 30, 2009 and
November 30, 2008 respectively, 13,500 and 13,800 shares underlying the
Company's stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earning
per share because the exercise prices of the stock options were greater than or
equal to the average price of the common shares, and therefore their inclusion
would have been anti-dilutive.
5. INVENTORIES:
As of
November 30, 2009, inventories consist of the following:
Gross
|
Reserve
|
Net
|
||||||||||
Raw
Materials
|
$ | 1,423,000 | $ | (319,000 | ) | $ | 1,104,000 | |||||
Work-In-Process
|
2,279,000 | (717,000 | ) | 1,562,000 | ||||||||
Finished
Goods
|
458,000 | (450,000 | ) | 8,000 | ||||||||
Totals
|
$ | 4,160,000 | $ | (1,486,000 | ) | $ | 2,674,000 |
As of
February 28, 2009, inventories consist of the following:
Gross
|
Reserve
|
Net
|
||||||||||
Raw
Materials
|
$ | 1,462,000 | $ | (319,000 | ) | $ | 1,143,000 | |||||
Work-In-Process
|
1,963,000 | (614,000 | ) | 1,349,000 | ||||||||
Finished
Goods
|
509,000 | (432,000 | ) | 77,000 | ||||||||
Totals
|
$ | 3,934,000 | $ | (1,365,000 | ) | $ | 2,569,000 |
For more
information regarding the Company’s inventory valuation policies, see
“Significant Accounting Policies—Inventories” in Note 1 to these financial
statements.
9
SOLITRON
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
6. INCOME
TAXES:
At
November 30, 2009, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $16,582,000 that expire through 2023. Such net
operating losses are available to offset future taxable income, if
any. As the utilization of such net operating losses for tax purposes
is not assured, the deferred tax asset has been mostly reserved through the
recording of a 100% valuation allowance. Should a cumulative change
in the ownership of more than 50% occur within a three-year period, there could
be an annual limitation on the use of the net operating loss
carryforward.
Total net
deferred taxes are comprised of the following at November 30, 2009:
Deferred
tax assets:
|
||||
Loss
carryforwards
|
$ | 6,240,000 | ||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
1,000 | |||
Inventory
allowance
|
550,000 | |||
Depreciation
|
84,000 | |||
Section
263A capitalized costs
|
112,000 | |||
Total
deferred tax assets
|
6,987,000 | |||
Valuation
allowance
|
(6,987,000 | ) | ||
Total
net deferred taxes
|
$ | 0 |
The
change in the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets is due principally to
the utilization of the net operating loss for the quarter ended November 30,
2009.
A
reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory tax rate to the Company’s effective
tax rate for the quarter ended November 30, 2009 is as follows:
U.S.
federal statutory rate
|
34.0 | % | ||
Change
in valuation allowance
|
(34.0 | ) | ||
Effective
income tax rate
|
0.0 | % |
7. OTHER
INCOME:
The
$4,000 of other income reflected in the condensed statements of income for the
quarter ended November 30, 2009 consists entirely of interest income on
investment in treasury bills net of changes in market value. The $27,000 of
other income reflected in the condensed statements of income for the quarter
ended November 30, 2008 consists entirely of interest income on investment in
treasury bills net of changes in market value.
8. ACCRUED
EXPENSES:
As of
November 30, 2009, accrued expenses and other liabilities consisted of the
following:
Payroll
and related employee benefits
|
$ | 363,000 | ||
Other
liabilities
|
7,000 | |||
|
$ |
370,000
|
10
SOLITRON
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
9. EXPORT SALES AND MAJOR
CUSTOMERS:
Revenues
from domestic and export sales to unaffiliated customers for the three months
ended November 30, 2009 are as follows:
Power
|
Field
Effect
|
Power
|
||||||||||||||||||
Geographic
Region
|
Transistors
|
Hybrids
|
Transistors
|
MOSFETS
|
Totals
|
|||||||||||||||
Europe
and Australia
|
$ | 0 | $ | 237,000 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 237,000 | ||||||||||
Canada
and Latin America
|
8,000 | 0 | 4,000 | 0 | 12,000 | |||||||||||||||
Far
East and Middle East
|
2,000 | 0 | 0 | 22,000 | 24,000 | |||||||||||||||
United
States
|
164,000 | 1,113,000 | 152,000 | 287,000 | 1,716,000 | |||||||||||||||
Totals
|
$ | 174,000 | $ | 1,350,000 | $ | 156,000 | $ | 309,000 | $ | 1,989,000 |
Revenues
from domestic and export sales to unaffiliated customers for the three months
ended November 30, 2008 are as follows:
Power
|
Field
Effect
|
Power
|
||||||||||||||||||
Geographic
Region
|
Transistors
|
Hybrids
|
Transistors
|
MOSFETS
|
Totals
|
|||||||||||||||
Europe
and Australia
|
$ | 0 | $ | 339,000 | $ | 22,000 | $ | 0 | $ | 361,000 | ||||||||||
Canada
and Latin America
|
9,000 | 0 | 0 | 7,000 | 16,000 | |||||||||||||||
Far
East and Middle East
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 9,000 | 9,000 | |||||||||||||||
260,000 | 840,000 | 159,000 | 459,000 | 1,718,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Totals
|
$ | 269,000 | $ | 1,179,000 | $ | 181,000 | $ | 475,000 | $ | 2,104,000 |
Revenues
from domestic and export sales are attributed to global geographic region
according to the location of the customer’s primary manufacturing or operating
facilities.
Sales to
the Company's top two customers, Raytheon Company and BAE Systems, Inc.,
accounted for approximately 60% of net sales for the quarter ended November 30,
2009 as compared with 53% of the Company's net sales for the quarter ended
November 30, 2008. Sales to Raytheon Company accounted for approximately
48% of net sales for the quarter ended November 30, 2009 and 36% for the quarter
ended November 30, 2008. Sales to BAE Systems, Inc. accounted for
approximately 12% of net sales for the quarter ended November 30, 2009 and 17%
for the quarter ended November 30, 2008.
10. MAJOR
SUPPLIERS
Purchases
from the Company’s two top suppliers, Platronics Seals and Streamtek, accounted
for approximately 31% of total purchases of production materials for the quarter
ended November 30, 2009. For the quarter ended November 30, 2008,
purchases from the Company’s two top suppliers, Platronics Seals and Stellar
Industries, Inc., accounted for approximately 20% of the Company's total
purchases of production materials.
11. SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
On
December 28, 2009, at the request of the State of New York Department of
Environmental Conservation (“NYDEC”), the Company entered into a revised Tolling
Agreement with NYDEC which provides for the tolling of applicable statutes of
limitation through the earlier of December 3, 2010 or the date the State
institutes a suit against the Company for any claims associated with the
Clarkstown Landfill Site. For additional details, please see note 3 in the Notes
to Financial Statements.
11
Item 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
|
Overview:
Solitron
Devices, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company” or “Solitron”), designs,
develops, manufactures and markets solid-state semiconductor components and
related devices primarily for the military and aerospace markets. The
Company manufactures a large variety of bipolar and metal oxide semiconductor
(“MOS”) power transistors, power and control hybrids, junction and power MOS
field effect transistors and other related products. Most of the
Company’s products are custom made pursuant to contracts with customers whose
end products are sold to the U.S. Government. Other products, such as
Joint Army/Navy transistors, diodes and Standard Military Drawings voltage
regulators, are sold as standard or catalog items.
The
following discussion and analysis of factors which have affected the Company's
financial position and operating results during the periods included in the
accompanying condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the Financial Statements and the related Notes to Financial Statements and
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended February 28, 2009 and the Condensed Financial Statements and the related
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements included in Item 1 of this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q.
Recent
Developments:
On
September 22, 2009, the Company received AS9100 Rev B certification as well as
re-certification for the ISO 9001:2000 quality management standard
certification. Companies in the aerospace industry are increasingly
selecting suppliers on the basis of AS9100 certification. Achieving certified
status means that the Company may now obtain new business that may have been out
of reach in the past and expects to maintain ongoing relationships with its
existing aerospace customers long into the future.
Significant Accounting
Policies:
The
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are
based upon the condensed financial statements included elsewhere in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q which are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. Preparing financial
statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. These estimates
and assumptions are affected by management’s application of accounting policies.
Our critical accounting policies include inventories, valuation of plant,
equipment, revenue recognition and accounting for income taxes. A discussion of
all of these critical accounting policies can be found in Note 1 of the “Notes
To Financial Statements” in Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009.
Trends and
Uncertainties:
During
the three months ended November 30, 2009, the Company’s book-to-bill ratio was
approximately 1.12 as compared to approximately 1.43 for the three months ended
November 30, 2008, reflecting a decrease in the volume of orders
booked. Generally, the intake of orders over the last twenty four
months has varied greatly as a result of the fluctuations in the general
economy, variations in defense spending on programs the Company supports, and
the timing of contract awards by the Department of Defense and subsequently by
its prime contractors, which is expected to continue over the next twelve to
thirty six months. The Company continues to identify means intended to reduce
its variable manufacturing costs to offset the potential impact of low volume of
orders to be shipped. However, should order intake continue to fall
drastically below the level experienced in the last twenty four months, the
Company might be required to implement further cost cutting or other downsizing
measures to continue its business operations.
Inventories
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using
the “first-in, first-out” (FIFO) method. The Company buys raw
material only to fill customer orders. Excess raw material is created
only when a vendor imposes a minimum buy in excess of actual
requirements. Such excess material will usually be utilized to meet
the requirements of the customer’s subsequent orders. If excess
material is not utilized after two fiscal years it is fully
reserved. Any inventory item once designated as reserved is carried
at zero value in all subsequent valuation activities.
12
The
Company’s inventory valuation policy is as follows:
Raw material /Work in process: | All material purchased, processed and/or used in the last two fiscal years is valued at the lower of its acquisition cost or market. All material not purchased/used in the last two fiscal years is fully reserved for. |
Finished
goods:
|
All
finished goods with firm orders for later delivery are valued (material
and overhead) at the lower of cost or market. All finished
goods with no orders are fully
reserved.
|
Direct
labor costs:
|
Direct
labor costs are allocated to finished goods and work in process inventory
based on engineering estimates of the amount of man hours required from
the different direct labor departments to bring each device to its
particular level of completion.
|
Results of Operations-Three
months Ended November 30, 2009 Compared to Three months Ended November 30,
2008:
Net sales
for the three months ended November 30, 2009 decreased 5% to $1,989,000 as
compared to $2,104,000 for the three months ended November 30,
2008. This decrease was primarily attributable to a lower level of
orders that were shipped in accordance with customer requirements.
Cost of
sales for the three months ended November 30, 2009 decreased to $1,563,000 from
$1,638,000 for the comparable period in 2008. Expressed as a
percentage of sales, cost of sale increased to 79% from 78% for the same period
in 2008. This change was due primarily to an increase in direct and
indirect labor costs.
Gross
profit for the three months ended November 30, 2009 decreased to $426,000 from
$466,000 for the three months ended November 30, 2008. Gross margins
on the Company’s sales decreased to 21% for the three months ended November 30,
2009 in comparison to 22% for the three months ended November 30,
2008. This change was due mainly to an increase in direct and
indirect labor costs.
For the
three months ended November 30, 2009, the Company shipped 46,687 units as
compared to 56,580 units shipped during the same period of the prior
year. It should be noted that since the Company manufactures a wide
variety of products with an average sales price ranging from less than one
dollar to several hundred dollars, such periodic variations in the Company’s
volume of units shipped should not be regarded as a reliable indicator of the
Company’s performance.
The
Company’s backlog of open orders increased 4% to $5,556,000 for the three months
ended November 30, 2009 as compared to an increase of 14% for the three months
ended November 30, 2008 as compared to the backlog as of November 30, 2007.
Changes in backlog reflect changes in the intake of orders and in the delivery
requirements of customers.
The
Company has experienced a decrease of 26% to $2,223,000 in the level of bookings
during the three months ended November 30, 2009 when compared with the three
months ended November 30, 2008. The decline in bookings for the current quarter
is principally a result of a decline in defense spending, resulting in a
decrease in the monetary value of, and timing differences in the placement of
contracts by the Department of Defense and its prime contractors.
Selling,
general, and administrative expenses decreased to $251,000 for the three
months ended November 30, 2009 from $357,000 for the comparable period in
2008. During the three months ended November 30, 2009, selling,
general, and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales fell to 13% as
compared with 17% for the three months ended November 30, 2008. The
percentage decrease was due primarily to decreases in sales wages, sales travel,
and sales commissions.
Operating
income for the three months ended November 30, 2009 increased to
$175,000 as compared to $109,000 for the three months ended November 30,
2008. This increase is due primarily to lower selling, general and
administrative expenses as discussed above.
13
The
Company recorded net other income of $4,000 for the three months ended November
30, 2009 as compared to $27,000 for the three months ended November 30,
2008. Net other income for the three months ended November 30, 2009
consisted entirely of interest income on investment in treasury bills net of
changes in market. For the three months ended November 30, 2008, the Company
recorded $27,000 of interest income on investment in treasury bills net of
changes in market value. The decrease in interest income is due
primarily to lower rates of return on invested funds.
Net
income for the three months November 30, 2009 increased to $179,000 as
compared to $136,000 for the same period in 2008. This increase is
due to lower selling, general, and administrative expenses as discussed
above.
Results of Operations-Nine
months ended November 30, 2009 Compared to Nine months ended November 30,
2008:
Net sales
for the nine months ended November 30, 2009 decreased 9% to $5,747,000 as
compared to $6,344,000 for the nine months ended November 30,
2008. This decrease was primarily attributable to a lower level of
orders that were shipped in accordance with customer requirements.
Cost of
sales for the nine months ended November 30, 2009 decreased to
$4,428,000 from $4,910,000 for the comparable period in
2008. Expressed as a percentage of sales, cost of sales remained at
77%, equal to the same period in 2008.
Gross
profit for the nine months ended November 30, 2009 decreased to
$1,319,000 from $1,434,000 for the nine months ended November 30, 2008.
Gross margins on the Company’s sales remained at 23%, equal to the same period
in 2008. The change in dollar amount was primarily due to a decrease in net
sales.
For the
nine months ended November 30, 2009, the Company shipped 127,367 units as
compared to 244,689 units shipped during the same period of the prior
year. It should be noted that since the Company manufactures a wide
variety of products with an average sales price ranging from less than one
dollar to several hundred dollars, such periodic variations in the Company’s
volume of units shipped should not be regarded as a reliable indicator of the
Company’s performance.
The
Company’s backlog of open orders decreased 12% to $5,556,000 for the nine months
ended November 30, 2009 as compared to an increase of 15% for the nine months
ended November 30, 2008 as compared to the backlog on November 30, 2007. Changes
in backlog resulted from changes in the intake of orders and in the delivery
dates required by customers.
The
Company has experienced a decrease of 31% in the level of bookings during the
nine months ended November 30, 2009 when compared with the amount of bookings
for the nine months ended November 30, 2008. The decrease over the current nine
month period occurred principally as a result of a decline in defense spending,
resulting in a decrease in the monetary value of contracts issued by the
Department of Defense and its prime contractors.
Selling,
general, and administrative expenses decreased to $763,000 for the nine months
ended November 30, 2009 from $874,000 for the comparable period in
2008. During the nine months ended November 30, 2009, selling,
general, and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased to
13% as compared to 14% for the nine months ended November 30,
2008. For the nine months ended November 30, 2009, the Company has
experienced higher professional and legal fees offset by lower selling, general
and administrative labor costs.
Operating
income for the nine months ended November 30, 2009 decreased to
$556,000 from $560,000 for the nine months ended November 30, 2008.
This decrease is due primarily to a decrease in net sales.
The
Company recorded net other income of $24,000 for the nine months ended November
30, 2009 as compared to net other income of $62,000 for the nine months ended
November 30, 2008. Included in net other income was interest income
of $15,000 for the nine months ended November 30, 2009 as compared to $62,000
for the nine months ended November 30, 2008. The decrease in interest
income is due primarily to lower interest rates on treasury bills. Also included
in net other income for the nine months ended November 30, 2009 was $16,000 of
income tax benefit offset by $7,000 of other expense due to the return of a
customer overpayment.
14
Net
income for the nine months ended November 30, 2009 decreased to $580,000 from
$622,000 for the same period in 2008. This decrease was due primarily
to a lower net sales volume.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources:
Subject
to the following discussion, the Company expects its sole source of liquidity
over the next twelve months to be cash from operations. However, due
to the level of current backlog and level of new order intake, the Company might
operate at a loss during the balance of the current fiscal year. The
Company anticipates that its capital expenditures required to sustain operations
will be approximately $200,000 during the balance of the current fiscal year and
will be funded from operations.
Based
upon (i) management’s best information as to current national defense
priorities, future defense programs, as well as management’s expectations as to
future defense spending, (ii) the market trends signaling a decline in the level
of future order intake, and an increase in the cost of raw materials and
operations that will result in the potential erosion of profit levels and
continued price pressures due to more intense competition, and (iii) the
continued competition in the defense and aerospace market, the Company believes
that it will have sufficient cash (generated from operations) on hand to satisfy
its operating needs during the balance of the current fiscal
year. However, due to the level of current backlog and new order
intake (due to the status of the general economy and the shift to Commercial
Off–The-Shelf (COTS) by the defense industry), the Company might operate at a
loss during the next twelve to eighteen months. Thus, based on these
factors and at the
current level of bookings, costs of raw materials and services, profit margins
and sales levels, the Company may not generate sufficient cash to satisfy its
operating needs and will need to utilize its cash reserve. Should the trend of
declining order intake continue, the Company has a contingency plan to further
reduce its size and thereby reduce its cost of operations within certain
limitations. Over the long-term, the Company believes that if the
volume and prices of product sales remain as presently experienced, the Company
will generate sufficient cash from operations to sustain
operations. In the event that bookings in the long-term continue to
decline significantly below the level experienced during the previous fiscal
year, the Company may be required to implement further cost-cutting or other
downsizing measures to continue its business operations. Such
cost-cutting measures could inhibit future growth prospects. In appropriate
situations, the Company may seek strategic alliances, joint ventures with others
or acquisitions in order to maximize marketing potential and utilization of
existing resources and provide further opportunities for growth.
The
Company continues to pay its former unsecured creditors at a rate of
approximately $7,000 per quarter. This stream of payments will continue until
the Company pays the remaining balance of approximately $1,065,000 in
full.
The
Company reported net income of $580,000 and operating income of $556,000 for the
nine months ended November 30, 2009.
At
November 30, 2009, February 28, 2009 and November 30, 2008, the Company had cash
of approximately $375,000, $440,000 and $68,000, respectively. The
increase in cash due to net income over the nine month period ended November 30,
2009 was offset by decreases to accounts payable, accrued expenses and by an
increase in the Company’s investment in treasury bills.
At
November 30, 2009, February 28, 2009 and November 30, 2008, the Company had
investments in treasury bills of approximately $5,462,000, $5,113,000 and
$5,012,000, respectively.
At
November 30, 2009, the Company had working capital of $7,567,000 as compared
with a working capital at November 30, 2008 of $6,615,000. At
February 28, 2009, the Company had a working capital of
$6,972,000. The $595,000 increase for the nine months ended November
30, 2009 was due mainly to a $308,000 decrease in current
liabilities.
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements:
The
Company has not engaged in any off-balance sheet arrangements.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not
applicable
15
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Some of
the statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are "forward-looking
statements," as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding our
business, financial condition, results of operations, strategies or
prospects. You can identify forward-looking statements by the fact that these
statements do not relate strictly to historical or current matters. Rather,
forward-looking statements relate to anticipated or expected events, activities,
trends or results. Because forward-looking statements relate to matters that
have not yet occurred, these statements are inherently subject to risks and
uncertainties. Many factors could cause our actual activities or results to
differ materially from the activities and results anticipated in forward-looking
statements. These factors include those described under the caption "Risk
Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2009,
including those identified below. We do not undertake any obligation to update
forward-looking statements.
Some of
the factors that may impact our business, financial condition, results of
operations, strategies or prospects include:
|
·
|
Our
complex manufacturing processes may lower yields and reduce our
revenues.
|
|
·
|
Our
business could be materially and adversely affected if we are unable to
obtain qualified supplies of raw materials, parts and finished components
on a timely basis and at a cost-effective
price.
|
|
·
|
We
are dependent on government contracts, which are subject to termination,
price renegotiations and regulatory compliance, which can increase the
cost of doing business and negatively impact our
revenues.
|
|
·
|
Changes
in government policy or economic conditions could negatively impact our
results.
|
|
·
|
Our
inventories may become obsolete and other assets may be subject to
risks.
|
|
·
|
Environmental
regulations could require us to incur significant
costs.
|
|
·
|
Our
business is highly competitive, and increased competition could reduce
gross profit margins and the value of an investment in our
Company.
|
|
·
|
Downturns
in the business cycle could reduce the revenues and profitability of our
business.
|
|
·
|
Our
operating results may decrease due to the decline of profitability in the
semiconductor industry.
|
|
·
|
Uncertainty
of current economic conditions, domestically and globally, could continue
to affect demand for our products and negatively impact our
business.
|
|
·
|
Cost
reduction efforts may be unsuccessful or insufficient to improve our
profitability and may adversely impact
productivity.
|
|
·
|
We
may not achieve the intended effects of our new business strategy, which
could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
|
|
·
|
Our
inability to introduce new products could result in decreased revenues and
loss of market share to competitors; new technologies could also reduce
the demand for our products.
|
|
·
|
Loss
of, or reduction of business from, substantial clients could hurt our
business by reducing our revenues, profitability and cash
flow.
|
|
·
|
A
shortage of three-inch silicon wafers could result in lost revenues due to
an inability to build our products.
|
|
·
|
The
nature of our products exposes us to potentially significant product
liability risk.
|
|
·
|
We
depend on the recruitment and retention of qualified personnel, and our
failure to attract and retain such personnel could seriously harm our
business.
|
|
·
|
Provisions
in our charter documents and rights agreement could make it more difficult
to acquire our Company and may reduce the market price of our
stock.
|
|
·
|
Natural
disasters, like hurricanes, or occurrences of other natural disasters
whether in the United States or internationally may affect the markets in
which our common stock trades, the markets in which we operate and our
profitability.
|
|
·
|
Natural
disasters, like hurricanes, or occurrences of other natural disasters
whether in the United States or internationally may affect the
availability of raw materials which may adversely affect our
profitability.
|
|
·
|
Failure
to protect our proprietary technologies or maintain the right to use
certain technologies may negatively affect our ability to
compete.
|
|
·
|
The
price of our common stock has fluctuated widely in the past and may
fluctuate widely in the future.
|
16
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
Our
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The
Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of its management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e), and 15d-15(e)) as of the
end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report. Based upon that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the
period covered by this Quarterly Report.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Based on
an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during
our last fiscal quarter identified in connection with that evaluation, that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
PART II– OTHER
INFORMATION
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS:
Exhibits
31
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
32
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
17
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
SOLITRON
DEVICES, INC.
|
||
Date:
January 12, 2010
|
||
/s/ Shevach Saraf
|
||
Shevach
Saraf
|
||
Chairman,
President,
|
||
Chief
Executive Officer,
|
||
Treasurer
and
|
||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
18
EXHIBIT
INDEX
EXHIBIT NUMBER
|
DESCRIPTION
|
|
31
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
19