Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
8-K - CUSTOM Q 8-K 1-12-2010 - CUSTOM Q INC | form8-k.htm |
EX-2.1 - EXHIBIT 2.1 - CUSTOM Q INC | ex2_1.htm |
EX-3.1 - EXHIBIT 3.1 - CUSTOM Q INC | ex3_1.htm |
EX-10.2 - EXHIBIT 10.2 - CUSTOM Q INC | ex10_2.htm |
EX-10.6 - EXHIBIT 10.6 - CUSTOM Q INC | ex10_6.htm |
EX-21.1 - EXHIBIT 21.1 - CUSTOM Q INC | ex21_1.htm |
EX-10.1 - EXHIBIT 10.1 - CUSTOM Q INC | ex10_1.htm |
EX-99.2 - EXHIBIT 99.2 - CUSTOM Q INC | ex99_2.htm |
EX-10.3 - EXHIBIT 10.3 - CUSTOM Q INC | ex10_3.htm |
EX-10.5 - EXHIBIT 10.5 - CUSTOM Q INC | ex10_5.htm |
EX-10.4 - EXHIBIT 10.4 - CUSTOM Q INC | ex10_4.htm |
Exhibit
99.1
R Squared
Contracting, Inc
December
31, 2008 and 2007
Index to
Financial Statements
Contents
|
Page(s)
|
||
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-2
|
||
Balance
Sheets
|
F-3
|
||
Statements
of Operations
|
F-4
|
||
Statement
of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
|
F-5
|
||
Statements
of Cash Flows
|
F-6
|
||
Notes
to the Financial Statements
|
F-7 to F-13 | ||
Interim
Financial Statements for the interim period ended September 30, 2009 and
2008 (Unaudited)
|
F-14
|
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
R Squared
Contracting, Inc.
San
Diego, California
We have
audited the accompanying balance sheets of R Squared Contracting, Inc. (the
“Company”) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the related statements of
operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then
ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The
Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its
internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of
internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2008
and 2007 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then
ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
/s/ Li & Company,
PC
Li &
Company, PC
Skillman,
New Jersey
January
3, 2010
F-2
R
Squared Contracting, Inc.
Balance
Sheets
December
31, 2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
Assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | - | $ | 76,845 | ||||
Accounts
receivable
|
109,399 | - | ||||||
Other
receivables
|
2,000 | - | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
111,399 | 76,845 | ||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
156,243 | 25,049 | ||||||
Security
deposit
|
6,000 | 600 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 273,642 | $ | 102,494 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
||||||||
Current
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 49,562 | $ | 28,458 | ||||
Accrued
expenses
|
22,482 | 45,242 | ||||||
Billings
in excess of cost and profit
|
124,177 | - | ||||||
Current
maturities of notes payable
|
118,224 | - | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
314,445 | 73,700 | ||||||
Notes
payable, net of current maturities
|
367,918 | 19,351 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
682,363 | 93,051 | ||||||
Stockholders'
Equity (Deficit):
|
||||||||
Common
stock: no par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; 800,000 and 100,000
shares issued and outstanding, respectively.
|
12,560 | 1,570 | ||||||
Retained
earnings (deficit)
|
(421,281 | ) | 7,873 | |||||
Total
stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
(408,721 | ) | 9,443 | |||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
$ | 273,642 | $ | 102,494 |
See
accompanying notes to the financial statements.
F-3
R
Squared Contracting, Inc.
Statements
of Operations
For
the Years Ended
|
For
the Years Ended
|
|||||||
December 31,
2008
|
December 31,
2007
|
|||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 357,546 | $ | 1,089,392 | ||||
Costs
of goods sold
|
252,988 | 893,156 | ||||||
Gross
profit
|
104,558 | 196,236 | ||||||
Operating
Expenses:
|
||||||||
Compensation
|
273,282 | 108,252 | ||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
260,430 | 80,111 | ||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
533,712 | 188,363 | ||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
(429,154 | ) | 7,873 | |||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
- | - | ||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (429,154 | ) | $ | 7,873 | |||
Net
income (loss) per common share - basic and diluted
|
$ | (4.21 | ) | $ | 0.08 | |||
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding – basic and
diluted
|
101,918 | 100,000 |
See
accompanying notes to the financial statements.
F-4
R
Squared Contracting, Inc.
Statement
of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
For the
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
Common
Shares
|
Amount
|
Retained
Earnings Deficit
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
January 1, 2007
|
- | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||
Common
stock issued for cash
|
100,000 | 1,570 | 1,570 | |||||||||||||
Net
income
|
7,873 | 7,873 | ||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2007
|
100,000 | 1,570 | 7,873 | 9,443 | ||||||||||||
Common
stock issued for services
|
476,000 | 7,473 | 7,473 | |||||||||||||
Common
stock issued for property and equipment
|
224,000 | 3,517 | 3,517 | |||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | (429,154 | ) | (429,154 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2008
|
800,000 | $ | 12,560 | $ | (421,281 | ) | $ | (408,721 | ) |
See
accompanying notes to the financial statements.
F-5
R Squared
Contracting, Inc.
Statements
of Cash Flows
For the
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
For
the Years Ended
|
For
the Years Ended
|
|||||||
December 31,
2008
|
December 31,
2007
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (429,154 | ) | $ | 7,873 | |||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
15,971 | 9,285 | ||||||
Common
stock issued for services
|
7,473 | - | ||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivables
|
(109,399 | ) | - | |||||
Other
receivables
|
(2,000 | ) | - | |||||
Security
deposit
|
(5,400 | ) | (600 | ) | ||||
Accounts
payable
|
21,104 | 28,458 | ||||||
Accrued
expenses
|
(22,760 | ) | 45,242 | |||||
Billings
in excess of cost and profit
|
124,177 | - | ||||||
Net
Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities
|
(399,988 | ) | 90,258 | |||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(143,648 | ) | (34,334 | ) | ||||
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
(143,648 | ) | (34,334 | ) | ||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from notes payable
|
466,791 | 19,351 | ||||||
Sale
of common stock
|
- | 1,570 | ||||||
Net
Cash Provided by Financing Activities
|
466,791 | 20,921 | ||||||
NET
CHANGE IN CASH
|
(76,845 | ) | 76,845 | |||||
CASH
AT BEGINNING OF YEAR
|
76,845 | - | ||||||
CASH
AT END OF YEAR
|
$ | - | $ | 76,845 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
SCHEDULE OF CASH FLOW ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Cash
Paid For:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
NON-CASH
FINANCING AND INVESTING
|
||||||||
Common
stock issued for property and equipment
|
$ | 3,517 | $ | - |
See
accompanying notes to the financial statements.
F-6
R
Squared Contracting, Inc.
December
31, 2008 and 2007
Notes to
the Financial Statements
NOTE 1 –
ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS
R Squared
Contracting, Inc. (“R Squared” or the “Company”) was incorporated in the State
of California on January 2, 2007. R Squared Contracting, Inc. is
based in San Diego, California and is a provider of energy efficiency products
and technologies to the residential, commercial and industrial building markets.
The Company is also a provider of Ethanol fuel and Ethanol production
technologies to residential, corporate and government customers.
NOTE 2 -
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of
presentation
The
Company’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S.
GAAP”).
Use of
estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reporting amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reported period. Significant estimates include the
estimated useful lives of property and equipment. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Cash
equivalents
The
Company considers highly liquid, temporary cash investments with an original
maturity period of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Accounts
receivable
Accounts
receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of an allowance for doubtful
accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best
estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing
accounts receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on historical
write-off experience, customer specific facts and economic conditions. Bad debt
expense is included in general and administrative expenses, if any.
Outstanding
account balances are reviewed individually for
collectability. Account balances are charged off against the
allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential
for recovery is considered remote.
The
Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its
customers.
Property and
equipment
Property
and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions
and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged
to operations as incurred. Depreciation of property and equipment is
computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective
estimated residual values) over the assets estimated useful lives ranging from
three (3) years to five (5) years. Upon sale or retirement of
property and equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are
removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the statements of
operations. Leasehold improvements, if any, are amortized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the lease or the estimated useful lives,
whichever is shorter. Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost
and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.
F-7
Impairment of long-lived
assets
The
Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS No. 144”) for its long-lived
assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include property and equipment,
are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
The
Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the
projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived
asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives
against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the
excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those
assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected
future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily
determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable,
but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than
originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are
depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful
lives. The Company determined that there were no impairments of
long-lived assets as of December 31, 2008 or 2007.
Fair value of financial
instruments
The
Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107 “Disclosures about fair value of
Financial Instruments” (“SFAS No. 107”) for disclosures about fair value
of its financial instruments and has adopted Financial Accounting Standards
Board (“FASB”) No. 157 “Fair
Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”) to measure the fair value of its
financial instruments. SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and
comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, SFAS No. 157
establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation
techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad
levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted
prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and
the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of
fair value hierarchy defined by SFAS No. 157 are described below:
Level
1
|
Quoted
market prices available in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities as of the reporting
date.
|
Level
2
|
Pricing
inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1,
which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting
date.
|
Level
3
|
Pricing
inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market
data.
|
The
carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash
and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short
maturity of these instruments. The Company’s notes payable approximate the fair
value of such instruments based upon management’s best estimate of interest
rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangements
at December 31, 2008 and 2007.
The
Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring or a non-recurring basis, consequently, the Company did not have any
fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value at
December 31, 2008 or 2007, nor gains or losses are reported in the statement of
operations that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses
relating to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date for
the interim period ended December 31, 2008 or 2007.
Revenue
recognition
In
accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 — “Revenue Recognition in
Financial Statements” (“SAB”), which was superseded by SAB 104, contract
revenues are recognized using the percentage of completion method. The
percentage of completion is calculated by dividing the direct labor and other
direct costs incurred by the total estimated direct costs of the project.
Contract value is defined as the total value of the contract, plus the value of
approved change orders. Estimates of costs to complete are reviewed periodically
and modified as required.
F-8
Revenue
from the sale of materials is recognized when delivery occurs and risk of
ownership passes to the customer.
Stock-based
compensation
The
Company accounted for its stock based compensation under the recognition and
measurement principles of the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004) “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS
No. 123R”) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board Emerging Issues Task
Force Issue No. 96-18
“Accounting For Equity Instruments That Are Issued To Other Than Employees For
Acquiring, Or In Conjunction With Selling Goods Or Services” (“EITF No.
96-18”) using the modified prospective method. All transactions in
which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of
equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the
consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued,
whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to
determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the
date on which the third-party performance is complete or the date on which it is
probable that performance will occur.
Income
taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes under Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. Under Statement No.
109, the asset and liability method is used in accounting for income
taxes. Deferred taxes are recognized for temporary differences
between the bases of assets and liabilities for financial statement and income
tax purposes. The temporary differences relate primarily to net
operating loss carryforwards. A valuation allowance is recorded for
deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some or all of the
deferred tax assets will not be realized through future operations.
In
addition, the Company follows the provisions of FASB Interpretation No.
48,"Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes," an interpretation of FASB
Statement No.109 ("FIN 48"). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of
a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. A company must
determine whether it is "more-likely-than-not" that a tax position will be
sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or
litigation procedures, based on the technical merits of the
position. Once it is determined that a position meets the
more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the position is measured to
determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. Review
of the Company’s possible tax for 2008 and 2007 did not result in any positions
requiring disclosure. Should the Company need to record interest
and/or penalties related to uncertain tax positions, or other tax authority
assessments, it would classify such expenses as part of the income tax
provision.
Net income (loss) per common
share
Basic net
income (loss) per common share has been calculated by dividing the net loss for
the period by the basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding.
Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted
average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of
common stock during the period. There were no potentially dilutive shares
outstanding as of December 31, 2008 or 2007.
Recently issued accounting
pronouncements
In June
2003, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted final
rules under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 404”), as
amended by SEC Release No. 33-9072 on October 13, 2009. Under the
provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, public companies and their
independent auditors are each required to report to the public on the
effectiveness of a company’s internal controls. The smallest public
companies with a public float below $75 million have been given extra time to
design, implement and document these internal controls before their auditors are
required to attest to the effectiveness of these controls. This
extension of time will expire beginning with the annual reports of companies
with fiscal years ending on or after June 15, 2010. . Commencing with
the Company’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company
will be required to include a report of management on its internal control over
financial reporting. The internal control report must include a
statement
F-9
·
|
Of
management’s responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over its financial
reporting;
|
·
|
Of
management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over
financial reporting as of fiscal year end;
and
|
·
|
Of
the framework used by management to evaluate the effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
|
Furthermore,
it is required to file the auditor’s attestation report separately on the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting on whether it believes that
the Company has maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting.
In June
2009, the FASB approved the “FASB Accounting Standards Codification” (the
“Codification”) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP
to be launched on July 1, 2009. The Codification does not change
current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative
U.S. GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular
topic in one place. All existing accounting standard documents will
be superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the
Codification will be considered non-authoritative. The Codification is effective
for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.
In August
2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-04 “Accounting for Redeemable Equity
Instruments - Amendment to Section 480-10-S99” which represents an update
to section 480-10-S99, distinguishing liabilities from equity, per EITF Topic
D-98, Classification and
Measurement of Redeemable Securities. The Company does not
expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In August
2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05 “Fair Value Measurement and
Disclosures Topic 820 – Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value”, which
provides amendments to subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
– Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities. This update
provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an
active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity
is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques:
1. A valuation technique that uses: a. The quoted price of the identical
liability when traded as an asset b. Quoted prices for similar liabilities or
similar liabilities when traded as assets. 2. Another valuation technique that
is consistent with the principles of topic 820; two examples would be an income
approach, such as a present value technique, or a market approach, such as a
technique that is based on the amount at the measurement date that the reporting
entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or would receive to enter
into the identical liability. The amendments in this update also clarify that
when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not
required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to
the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The
amendments in this update also clarify that both a quoted price in an active
market for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market
when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1
fair value measurements. The Company does not expect the adoption of
this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
In
September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-08
“Earnings Per Share –
Amendments to Section 260-10-S99”,which represents technical corrections
to topic 260-10-S99, Earnings per share, based on EITF Topic D-53, Computation of Earnings Per Share
for a Period that includes a Redemption or an Induced Conversion of a Portion of
a Class of Preferred Stock and EITF Topic D-42, The Effect of the Calculation of
Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred
Stock. The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a
material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
In
September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-09
“Accounting for
Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures and Accounting for Equity-Based
Payments to Non-Employees”. This update represents a
correction to Section 323-10-S99-4, Accounting by an Investor for
Stock-Based Compensation Granted to Employees of an Equity Method
Investee. Additionally, it adds observer comment Accounting Recognition for Certain
Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees
to the Codification. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material
impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
F-10
In
September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-12
“Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures Topic 820 – Investment in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Assets
Value Per Share (or Its Equivalent)”, which provides amendments to
Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall, for the fair
value measurement of investments in certain entities that calculate net asset
value per share (or its equivalent). The amendments in this update permit, as a
practical expedient, a reporting entity to measure the fair value of an
investment that is within the scope of the amendments in this update on the
basis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent) if
the net asset value of the investment (or its equivalent) is calculated in a
manner consistent with the measurement principles of Topic 946 as of the
reporting entity’s measurement date, including measurement of all or
substantially all of the underlying investments of the investee in accordance
with Topic 820. The amendments in this update also require disclosures by major
category of investment about the attributes of investments within the scope of
the amendments in this update, such as the nature of any restrictions on the
investor’s ability to redeem its investments a the measurement date, any
unfunded commitments (for example, a contractual commitment by the investor to
invest a specified amount of additional capital at a future date to fund
investments that will be make by the investee), and the investment strategies of
the investees. The major category of investment is required to be determined on
the basis of the nature and risks of the investment in a manner consistent with
the guidance for major security types in U.S. GAAP on investments in debt and
equity securities in paragraph 320-10-50-1B. The disclosures are required for
all investments within the scope of the amendments in this update regardless of
whether the fair value of the investment is measured using the practical
expedient. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on
its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
Management
does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective
accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the
accompanying financial statements.
NOTE 3 –
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property
and equipment at December 31, 2008 and 2007 consisted of:
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Vehicles
|
$ | 76,190 | $ | 31,311 | ||||
Leasehold
Improvements
|
94,436 | - | ||||||
Furniture
and Equipment
|
10,873 | 3,023 | ||||||
181,499 | 34,334 | |||||||
Less:
Accumulated Depreciation
|
(25,256 | ) | (9,285 | ) | ||||
Property
and Equipment, net
|
$ | 156,243 | $ | 25,049 |
On
December 31, 2008, the Company issued 224,000 shares for furniture and equipment
valued at $3,517.
Depreciation
and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was
$15,971 and $9,285 respectively.
NOTE 4 –
NOTES PAYABLE
Notes
payable at December 31, 2008 and 2007 consisted of:
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Vehicle
loans
|
$ | 42,072 | $ | - | ||||
Related
party promissory notes
|
444,070 | 19,351 | ||||||
486,142 | 19,351 | |||||||
Less:
current maturities
|
(118,224 | ) | - | |||||
$ | 367,918 | $ | 19,351 |
Vehicle
Loans
In 2008,
the Company purchased two vehicles that were financed through GMAC. Interest on
the GMAC loans is 9.75% and monthly payments approximate $950. Final
payments for both loans are due in July 2013.
F-11
Related Party Promissory
Notes
On
October 8, 2008, the Company issued a promissory note (the “Note”) to Pacific
Consortium Investments (“Pacific”) in the amount of $300,000. Interest accrues
on the note at the rate of 5% per annum. Under the term of the Note, the Company
shall make 36 monthly payments of $9,180 beginning on March 15,
2009. Subsequent to execution of the Note, Pacific advanced the
Company additional amounts totaling $100,000 which are treated as additional
borrowings under the Note. The controlling party of Pacific is a shareholder of
the Company.
In 2008,
the Company borrowed $15,000 from a related party. The amount was paid in full
in July 2009. There was no interest on the note.
In 2007,
the Company issued a note payable to a related party in the amount of
$19,351.During 2008 the Company received additional funds from the same party in
the amount of $9,719. The notes bear no interest and are payable on
demand.
NOTE 5 -
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
On
January 2, 2007, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to its
founder and Chief Executive Officer for cash of $1,570.
On
December 31, 2008, the Company issued 224,000 shares for furniture and equipment
valued at $3,517, the value of the equipment.
On
December 31, 2008, the Company issued 476,000 shares for consulting
services. The Company recorded consulting fee expense of $7,473
related to the issue of the shares, the fair value of the common stock on the
date of issuance.
NOTE 6 –
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The
Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date of
September 30, 2009 through January 3, 2010, the date when the financial
statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The
Management of the Company determined that there were certain reportable
subsequent events to be disclosed as follows:
Distribution
Agreement
Pursuant
to an Agreement dated January 14, 2009 between the Company and E-Fuel
Corporation (“E-Fuel”), (the “Distribution Agreement”), the Company acquired
exclusive rights to distribute E-Fuel equipment, parts and accessories used in
the production of ethanol for San Diego, Orange and Los Angeles counties in the
state of California. The term of the Distribution Agreement is for
three years and may be extended for additional one year term(s) by the mutual
written consent of the Company and E-Fuel. Under the term of the Agreement, the
Company is required to minimum order quantities. The Company paid E-Fuel a
$500,000 distribution fee to acquire the limited exclusive distribution rights.
The distribution fee will be amortized over the initial three year term of the
Agreement; beginning when the Company completes its beta testing of the E-Fuel
equipment.
Convertible
Notes
During
the nine months ended September 2009, the Company issued $625,000 of convertible
notes payable (the “Notes”) to investors. The Notes are due and payable on the
earlier of (1) twenty-four (24) months from the date of issuance or (2) upon
receipt of financing by the Company, whether by debt or equity, of gross
proceeds of at least $3 million. The Notes accrue interest at the rate of 8% per
annum.
Should
the Company complete any financings, debt or equity, which include any equity
component or provide for a right to convert into equity, and if the entire
principal of the loan remains outstanding, the investors shall have the option
to convert, on an all-or-none basis, the entire principal and outstanding
interest of the Notes into said financing at a price equal to eighty-five
percent (85%) of the purchase price of said financing.
F-12
Legal
Proceedings
The
Company is subject to one legal proceeding that is discussed
below. The Company does not believe it has a potential liability
related to the current legal proceedings that could have a material adverse
effect on its financial condition, liquidity or results of operations. However,
the result of the legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. Should
the Company fail to prevail in this legal matters, then the operating results
could be materially adversely affected.
On
September 3, 2009, the Company was served with a complaint filed by a former
employee/ shareholder, Keith Miles, in the San Diego Superior Court (Keith Miles
v. R Squared Contracting, Inc., dba Greenhouse Builders; Robert Russell
Earnshaw; John Galt; Galt Corp.; and Does 1 through 25, San Diego Superior Court
case number 37-2009-00097598-CU-BC-CTL). In this complaint, Miles
asserts that the manner and procedures used to terminate Mr. Miles were not in
accordance with the Management Agreement and Shareholder Agreement executed
among the relevant parties. In connection therewith, Miles seeks: Declaratory
Relief, Breach of Contract, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Constructive Trust,
Accounting and Claim and Delivery.
The
Company intends to vigorously defend against this allegation.
F-13
R
Squared Contracting, Inc.
Balance
Sheets
|
|
|||||||
September 30,
2009
|
December 31,
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
Assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 121,142 | $ | - | ||||
Accounts
receivable
|
1,239,173 | 109,399 | ||||||
Other
receivables
|
93,292 | 2,000 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
127,622 | - | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
1,581,229 | 111,399 | ||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
144,545 | 156,243 | ||||||
Security
deposit
|
6,000 | 6,000 | ||||||
Distribution
rights
|
500,000 | - | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 2,231,774 | $ | 273,642 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
||||||||
Current
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 569,495 | $ | 49,562 | ||||
Accrued
expenses
|
66,846 | 22,482 | ||||||
Billings
in excess of cost and profit
|
1,248,784 | 124,177 | ||||||
Current
maturities of notes payable
|
101,575 | 118,224 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
1,986,700 | 314,445 | ||||||
Notes
payable, net of current maturities
|
1,672,587 | 367,918 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
3,659,287 | 682,363 | ||||||
Stockholders'
Deficit:
|
||||||||
Common
stock: no par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; 800,000 shares issued
and outstanding
|
12,560 | 12,560 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(1,440,073 | ) | (421,281 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders’ deficit
|
(1,427,513 | ) | (408,721 | ) | ||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
$ | 2,231,774 | $ | 273,642 |
See
accompanying notes to the financial statements.
F-14
R
Squared Contracting, Inc.
Statements
of Operations
(Unaudited)
For
the Nine Months Ended
|
For
the Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||
September 30,
2009
|
September 30,
2008
|
|||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 3,486,217 | $ | 238,609 | ||||
Costs
of goods sold
|
2,201,725 | 76,812 | ||||||
Gross
profit
|
1,284,492 | 161,797 | ||||||
Operating
Expenses:
|
||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
2,267,377 | 389,077 | ||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
2,267,377 | 389,077 | ||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
(982,885 | ) | (227,280 | ) | ||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
35,907 | - | ||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (1,018,792 | ) | $ | (227,280 | ) | ||
Net
income (loss) per common share - basic and diluted
|
$ | (1.27 | ) | $ | (2.27 | ) | ||
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding – basic and
diluted
|
800,000 | 100,000 |
See
accompanying notes to the financial statements.
F-15
R Squared
Contracting, Inc.
Statements
of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
For
the Nine Months Ended
|
For
the Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||
September 30,
2009
|
September 30,
2008
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (1,018,792 | ) | $ | (227,280 | ) | ||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
37,985 | 14,145 | ||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivables
|
(1,129,774 | ) | (77,407 | ) | ||||
Other
receivables
|
(91,292 | ) | (2,000 | ) | ||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
(127,622 | ) | - | |||||
Security
deposit
|
- | (5,400 | ) | |||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
564,297 | (55,114 | ) | |||||
Billings
in excess of cost and profit
|
1,124,607 | - | ||||||
Net
Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities
|
(640,591 | ) | (353,056 | ) | ||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(26,287 | ) | (49,210 | ) | ||||
Payment
for distribution rights
|
(500,000 | ) | - | |||||
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
(526,287 | ) | (49,210 | ) | ||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from notes payable
|
1,308,667 | 330,073 | ||||||
Payments
of notes payable
|
(20,647 | ) | - | |||||
Net
Cash Provided by Financing Activities
|
1,288,020 | 330,073 | ||||||
NET
CHANGE IN CASH
|
121,142 | (72,193 | ) | |||||
CASH
AT BEGINNING OF YEAR
|
- | 76,845 | ||||||
CASH
AT END OF YEAR
|
$ | 121,142 | $ | 4,652 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
SCHEDULE OF CASH FLOW ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Cash
Paid For:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | - | $ | - |
See
accompanying notes to the financial statements.
F-16
R
Squared Contracting, Inc.
September
30, 2009 and 2008
Notes to
the Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 –
ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS
R Squared
Contracting, Inc. (“R Squared” or the “Company”) was incorporated in the State
of California on January 2, 2007. R Squared Contracting, Inc. is
based in San Diego, California and is a provider of energy efficiency products
and technologies to the residential, commercial and industrial building markets.
The Company is also a provider of Ethanol fuel and Ethanol production
technologies to residential, corporate and government customers.
NOTE 2 –
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis
of presentation
The
accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and
with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10 and Article 8 of Regulation
S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals)
considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of
operations realized during an interim period are not necessarily indicative of
results to be expected for a full year. These financial statements should be
read in conjunction with the information filed as part of the Company’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1, of which this Prospectus is a
part.
Use
of estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements as well as the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Cash
equivalents
The
Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months
or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Accounts
receivable
Accounts
receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of an allowance for doubtful
accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best
estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing
accounts receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on historical
write-off experience, customer specific facts and economic conditions. Bad debt
expense is included in general and administrative expenses, if any.
Outstanding
account balances are reviewed individually for
collectability. Account balances are charged off against the
allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential
for recovery is considered remote. The Company does not have any
off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its customers.
Property
and equipment
F-17
Property
and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions
and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged
to operations as incurred. Depreciation of property, plant and
equipment is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account
their respective estimated residual values) over the assets estimated useful
lives ranging from five (5) years to seven (7) years. Upon sale or
retirement of property, plant and equipment, the related cost and accumulated
depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in
the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive
Income. Leasehold improvements, if any, are amortized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the lease or the estimated useful lives,
whichever is shorter. Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost
and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.
Impairment
of long-lived assets
The
Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived
assets, which include property and equipment, are reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
the asset may not be recoverable.
The
Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the
projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived
asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives
against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is
based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those
assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected
future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily
determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable,
but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than
originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are
depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful
lives. The Company determined that there were no impairments of
long-lived assets as of September 30, 2009 or 2008.
Customer
deposits
Customer
deposits primarily represent amounts received from customers for future delivery
of products, all of which were fully or partially refundable depending upon the
terms and conditions of the sales agreements.
Fair
value of financial instruments
The
Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and
paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph
820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial
instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value
measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair
value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to
measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value
hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to
unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy
defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:
Level
1
|
Quoted
market prices available in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities as of the reporting
date.
|
Level
2
|
Pricing
inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1,
which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting
date.
|
Level
3
|
Pricing
inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market
data.
|
The
carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as
cash, accounts payable, accrued expenses and customer deposits, approximate
their fair values because of the short maturity of these
instruments.
F-18
The
Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring or a non-recurring basis, consequently, the Company did not have any
fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value at
September 30, 2009 or 2008, nor gains or losses are reported in the statement of
operations that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses
relating to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date for
the interim period ended September 30, 2009 or 2008.
Revenue
recognition
In
accordance with paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification for revenue contract revenues are recognized using the percentage
of completion method. The percentage of completion is calculated by dividing the
direct labor and other direct costs incurred by the total estimated direct costs
of the project. Contract value is defined as the total value of the contract,
plus the value of approved change orders. Estimates of costs to complete are
reviewed periodically and modified as required.
Income
taxes
The
Company follows Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification,
which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the
expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the
financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax
assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial
statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in
effect for the year in which the differences are expected to
reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to
the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will
not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured
using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in
which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a
change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Operations in the period
that includes the enactment date.
The
Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification
(“Section 740-10-25”). Section 740-10-25.addresses the determination of whether
tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be
recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the
Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it
is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination
by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the
position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial
statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit
that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon
ultimate settlement.
Section
740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and
penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased
disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its
liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of
Section 740-10-25.
Net loss per common
share
Net loss
per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net loss per share is
computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common
stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is
computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common
stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during each
period. There were no potentially dilutive shares outstanding as of
September 30, 2009 or 2008.
Recently issued accounting
standards
In June
2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted final rules under
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 404”), as amended by SEC
Release No. 33-9072 on October 13, 2009. Under the provisions of Section 404 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, public companies and their independent auditors are each
required to report to the public on the effectiveness of a company’s internal
controls. The smallest public companies with a public float below $75
million have been given extra time to design, implement and document these
internal controls before their auditors are required to attest to the
effectiveness of these controls. This extension of time will expire
beginning with the annual reports of companies with fiscal years ending on or
after June 15, 2010. Commencing with its annual report for the year
ending December 31, 2010, the Company will be required to include a report of
management on its internal control over financial reporting. The internal
control report must include a statement
F-19
o
|
of
management’s responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over its financial
reporting;
|
o
|
of
management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over
financial reporting as of year end;
and
|
o
|
of
the framework used by management to evaluate the effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
|
Furthermore,
it is required to file the auditor’s attestation report separately on the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting on whether it believes that
the Company has maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting.
In June
2009, the FASB approved the “FASB Accounting Standards Codification” (the
“Codification”) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP
to be launched on July 1, 2009. The Codification does not change
current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative
U.S. GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular
topic in one place. All existing accounting standard documents will
be superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the
Codification will be considered non-authoritative. The Codification is effective
for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.
In August
2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-04 “Accounting for Redeemable Equity
Instruments - Amendment to Section 480-10-S99” which represents an update
to section 480-10-S99, distinguishing liabilities from equity, per EITF Topic
D-98, Classification and
Measurement of Redeemable Securities. The Company does not
expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In August
2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05 “Fair Value Measurement and
Disclosures Topic 820 – Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value”, which
provides amendments to subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
– Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities. This update
provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an
active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity
is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques:
1. A valuation technique that uses: a. The quoted price of the identical
liability when traded as an asset b. Quoted prices for similar liabilities or
similar liabilities when traded as assets. 2. Another valuation technique that
is consistent with the principles of topic 820; two examples would be an income
approach, such as a present value technique, or a market approach, such as a
technique that is based on the amount at the measurement date that the reporting
entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or would receive to enter
into the identical liability. The amendments in this update also clarify that
when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not
required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to
the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The
amendments in this update also clarify that both a quoted price in an active
market for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market
when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1
fair value measurements. The Company does not expect the adoption of
this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
In
September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-08
“Earnings Per Share –
Amendments to Section 260-10-S99”,which represents technical corrections
to topic 260-10-S99, Earnings per share, based on EITF Topic D-53, Computation of Earnings Per Share
for a Period that includes a Redemption or an Induced Conversion of a Portion of
a Class of Preferred Stock and EITF Topic D-42, The Effect of the Calculation of
Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred
Stock. The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a
material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
In
September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-09
“Accounting for
Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures and Accounting for Equity-Based
Payments to Non-Employees”. This update represents a
correction to Section 323-10-S99-4, Accounting by an Investor for
Stock-Based Compensation Granted to Employees of an Equity Method
Investee. Additionally, it adds observer comment Accounting Recognition for Certain
Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees
to the Codification. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material
impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
F-20
In
September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-12
“Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures Topic 820 – Investment in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Assets
Value Per Share (or Its Equivalent)”, which provides amendments to
Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall, for the fair
value measurement of investments in certain entities that calculate net asset
value per share (or its equivalent). The amendments in this update permit, as a
practical expedient, a reporting entity to measure the fair value of an
investment that is within the scope of the amendments in this update on the
basis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent) if
the net asset value of the investment (or its equivalent) is calculated in a
manner consistent with the measurement principles of Topic 946 as of the
reporting entity’s measurement date, including measurement of all or
substantially all of the underlying investments of the investee in accordance
with Topic 820. The amendments in this update also require disclosures by major
category of investment about the attributes of investments within the scope of
the amendments in this update, such as the nature of any restrictions on the
investor’s ability to redeem its investments a the measurement date, any
unfunded commitments (for example, a contractual commitment by the investor to
invest a specified amount of additional capital at a future date to fund
investments that will be make by the investee), and the investment strategies of
the investees. The major category of investment is required to be determined on
the basis of the nature and risks of the investment in a manner consistent with
the guidance for major security types in U.S. GAAP on investments in debt and
equity securities in paragraph 320-10-50-1B. The disclosures are required for
all investments within the scope of the amendments in this update regardless of
whether the fair value of the investment is measured using the practical
expedient. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on
its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
Management
does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective
accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the
accompanying financial statements.
NOTE 3 -
FINANCIAL CONDITION
As
reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had an
accumulated deficit of $1,440,083 at September 30, 2009, a net loss and net cash
used in operations of $1,018,792 and $640,591 for the interim period ended
September 30, 2009, respectively.
While the
Company is attempting to produce sufficient revenues, the Company’s cash
position may not be sufficient to support the Company’s daily operations. While
the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to produce sales volume
and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that
effect. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be
necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. Management
believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its
business plan and generate revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to
continue as a going concern.
NOTE 4 –
DISTRIBUTION RIGHTS
Pursuant
to an Agreement dated January 14, 2009 between the Company and E-Fuel
Corporation (“E-Fuel”), (the “Distribution Agreement”), the Company acquired
exclusive rights to distribute E-Fuel equipment, parts and accessories used in
the production of ethanol for San Diego, Orange and Los Angeles counties in the
state of California. The term of the Distribution Agreement is for
three years and maybe extended for an additional one year term(s) by the mutual
written consent of the Company and E-Fuel. Under the term of the Agreement, the
Company is required to minimum order quantities. The Company paid E-Fuel a
$500,000 distribution fee to acquire the limited exclusive distribution rights.
The distribution fee will be amortized over the initial three year term of the
Agreement; beginning when the Company completes its beta testing of the E-Fuel
equipment.
NOTE 5 –
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
F-21
Property
and equipment at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consisted
of:
September 30,
2009
|
December 31,
2008
|
|||||||
Vehicles
|
$ | 102,478 | $ | 76,190 | ||||
Leasehold
Improvements
|
94,436 | 94,436 | ||||||
Furniture
and Equipment
|
10,873 | 10,873 | ||||||
207,785 | 181,499 | |||||||
Less:
Accumulated Depreciation
|
(63,240 | ) | (25,256 | ) | ||||
Property
and Equipment, net
|
$ | 144,545 | $ | 156,243 |
On
December 31, 2008, the Company issued 224,000 shares for furniture and equipment
valued at $3,517.
Depreciation
and amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
was $37,985 and $14,145 respectively.
NOTE 6 –
NOTES PAYABLE
Notes
payable at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consisted of:
September 30,
2009
|
December 31,
2008
|
|||||||
Vehicle
loans
|
$ | 60,420 | $ | 42,072 | ||||
Convertible
notes
|
625,000 | - | ||||||
Related
party promissory notes
|
1,088,742 | 444,070 | ||||||
1,774,162 | 486,142 | |||||||
Less:
current maturities
|
(101,575 | ) | (118,224 | ) | ||||
$ | 1,672,587 | $ | 367,918 |
Convertible
Notes
During
the nine months ended September 2009, the Company issued $625,000 of convertible
notes payable (the “Notes”) to investors. The Notes are due and payable on the
earlier of (1) twenty-four (24) months from the date of issuance or (2) upon
receipt of financing by the Company, whether by debt or equity, of gross
proceeds of at least $3 million. The Notes accrue interest at the rate of 8% per
annum. Should the Company complete any financings, debt or equity, which include
any equity component or provide for a right to convert into equity, and if the
entire principal of the loan remains outstanding, the investors shall have the
option to convert, on an all-or-none basis, the entire principal and outstanding
interest of the Notes into said financing at a price equal to eighty-five
percent (85%) of the purchase price of said financing.
Vehicle
Loans
In 2008,
the Company purchased to two vehicles that were financed through GMAC. Interest
on the GMAC loans is 9.75% and monthly payments approximate
$950. Final payments for both loans are due in July
2013.
Related Party Promissory
Notes
On
October 8, 2008, the Company issued a promissory note (the “Note”) to Pacific
Consortium Investments (“Pacific”) in the amount of $300,000. Interest accrues
on the note at the rate of 5% per annum. Under the term of the Note, the Company
shall make 36 monthly payments of $9,180 beginning on March 15,
2009. Subsequent to execution of the Note, Pacific advanced the
Company additional amounts totaling $100,000 through December 31, 2008 and
$100,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 which is treated as
additional borrowings under the Note. The controlling party of Pacific is a
shareholder of the Company.
F-22
In 2008,
the Company borrowed $15,000 from a related party. The amount was paid in full
in July 2009. There was no interest on the note.
In 2007,
the Company issued a note payable to a related party in the amount of
$19,351.During 2008 the Company received additional funds from the same party in
the amount of $9,719. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the
Company received additional funds from the same party in the amount of
$18,518.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company issued a note payable in
the amount of $300,000 and received a loan in the amount of $41,153 from its
principal shareholder and Chief Executive Officer. The Company also issued two
promissory notes of $100,000 each to related parties.
NOTE 7 –
CONTINGENCIES
Legal
Proceedings
The
Company is subject to one legal proceeding that is discussed
below. The Company does not believe it has a potential liability
related to the current legal proceedings that could have a material adverse
effect on its financial condition, liquidity or results of operations. However,
the result of the legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. Should
the Company fail to prevail in this legal matters, then the operating results
could be materially adversely affected.
On
September 3, 2009, the Company was served with a complaint filed by a former
employee/ shareholder, Keith Miles, in the San Diego Superior Court (Keith Miles
v. R Squared Contracting, Inc., dba Greenhouse Builders; Robert Russell
Earnshaw; John Galt; Galt Corp.; and Does 1 through 25, San Diego Superior Court
case number 37-2009-00097598-CU-BC-CTL). In this complaint, Miles
asserts that the manner and procedures used to terminate Mr. Miles were not in
accordance with the Management Agreement and Shareholder Agreement executed
among the relevant parties. In connection therewith, Miles seeks: Declaratory
Relief, Breach of Contract, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Constructive Trust,
Accounting and Claim and Delivery.
The
Company intends to vigorously defend against this allegation.
NOTE 8 –
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The
Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date of
September 30, 2009 through January 3, 2010, the date when the financial
statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The
Management of the Company determined that there was a reportable subsequent
events to be disclosed as follows:
From
October through December 2009, the Company issued an additional $125,000 of
convertible notes (the “Notes”) payable to investors. The Notes are due and
payable on the earlier of (1) twenty-four (24) months from the date of issuance
or (2) upon receipt of financing by the Company, whether by debt or equity, of
gross proceeds of at least $3 million. The Notes accrue interest at the rate of
8% per annum. Should the Company complete any financings, debt or equity, which
include any equity component or provide for a right to convert into equity, and
if the entire principal of the loan remains outstanding, the investors shall
have the option to convert, on an all-or-none basis, the entire principal and
outstanding interest of the Notes into said financing at a price equal to
eighty-five percent (85%) of the purchase price of said
financing.
F-23