Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
8-K - FORM 8-K - DFC GLOBAL CORP. | w76019e8vk.htm |
EX-99.3 - EX-99.3 - DFC GLOBAL CORP. | w76019exv99w3.htm |
EX-99.1 - EX-99.1 - DFC GLOBAL CORP. | w76019exv99w1.htm |
EX-99.4 - EX-99.4 - DFC GLOBAL CORP. | w76019exv99w4.htm |
EX-23.1 - EX-23.1 - DFC GLOBAL CORP. | w76019exv23w1.htm |
EX-99.2 - EX-99.2 - DFC GLOBAL CORP. | w76019exv99w2.htm |
Exhibit
99.5
Item 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Dollar Financial Corp.
Dollar Financial Corp.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Dollar Financial Corp. as of June
30, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity, and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2009. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Dollar Financial Corp. at June 30, 2009 and 2008
and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended June 30, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the provisions
of FASB Staff Position APB 14-1, Accounting for convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled
Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement) and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statementsan Amendment of ARB No. 51,
effective July 1, 2009, and restrospectively adjusted all periods presented in the consolidated
financial statements referred to above for the changes.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the effectiveness of Dollar Financial Corp.s internal control over
financial reporting as of June 30, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
and our report dated September 3, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/
Ernst & Young LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
September 3, 2009, except for the retrospective adoption of accounting principles described in Note
2 and the subsequent events disclosed in Note 23, as to which the date is November 20, 2009.
1
PART 1.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
June 30, | ||||||||
2008 | 2009 | |||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current Assets
|
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 209,714 | $ | 209,602 | ||||
Loans receivable, net:
|
||||||||
Loans receivable
|
123,683 | 126,826 | ||||||
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
(7,853 | ) | (12,132 | ) | ||||
Loans receivable, net
|
115,830 | 114,694 | ||||||
Loans in default, net of an allowance of $22,580 and $17,000
|
11,317 | 6,436 | ||||||
Other receivables
|
11,031 | 7,299 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
18,938 | 22,794 | ||||||
Current deferred tax asset, net of valuation allowance of $4,335
and $4,816
|
471 | 39 | ||||||
Total current assets
|
367,301 | 360,864 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset, net of valuation allowance of $76,573 and
$84,972
|
11,720 | 27,062 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$98,302 and $99,803
|
68,033 | 58,614 | ||||||
Goodwill and other intangibles
|
470,731 | 454,347 | ||||||
Debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization of $4,323
and $6,815
|
13,597 | 9,869 | ||||||
Other
|
10,030 | 10,709 | ||||||
Total Assets
|
$ | 941,412 | $ | 921,465 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
Current Liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts payable
|
$ | 51,054 | $ | 36,298 | ||||
Income taxes payable
|
12,194 | 14,834 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
32,189 | 70,588 | ||||||
Debt due within one year
|
9,187 | 5,880 | ||||||
Current deferred tax liability
|
| 71 | ||||||
Total current liabilities
|
104,624 | 127,671 | ||||||
Fair value of derivatives
|
37,214 | 10,223 | ||||||
Long-term deferred tax liability
|
22,352 | 18,876 | ||||||
Long-term debt
|
526,399 | 530,425 | ||||||
Other non-current liabilities
|
11,391 | 25,192 | ||||||
Stockholders equity:
|
||||||||
Common stock, $.001 par value: 55,500,000 shares
authorized; 24,229,178 shares and 24,102,985 shares
issued and outstanding at June 30, 2008 and June 30,
2009, respectively
|
24 | 24 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
309,113 | 311,301 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit
|
(103,759 | ) | (110,581 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
34,054 | 8,018 | ||||||
Total Dollar Financial Corp. stockholders equity
|
239,432 | 208,762 | ||||||
Non controlling interests
|
| 316 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity
|
239,432 | 209,078 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
$ | 941,412 | $ | 921,465 | ||||
See notes to interim unaudited consolidated financial statements
2
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands except share and per share amounts)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands except share and per share amounts)
Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||
Check cashing
|
$ | 166,754 | $ | 196,580 | $ | 164,598 | ||||||
Fees from consumer lending
|
227,445 | 292,517 | 275,272 | |||||||||
Money transfer fees
|
20,879 | 27,512 | 26,823 | |||||||||
Franchise fees and royalties
|
6,958 | 4,998 | 4,211 | |||||||||
Other
|
33,696 | 50,577 | 56,949 | |||||||||
Total revenues
|
455,732 | 572,184 | 527,853 | |||||||||
Store and regional expenses:
|
||||||||||||
Salaries and benefits
|
129,522 | 159,363 | 145,716 | |||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
45,799 | 58,458 | 52,136 | |||||||||
Occupancy
|
32,270 | 43,018 | 41,812 | |||||||||
Depreciation
|
9,455 | 13,663 | 13,075 | |||||||||
Returned checks, net and cash shortages
|
15,295 | 20,360 | 16,021 | |||||||||
Telephone and communications
|
6,425 | 7,185 | 7,504 | |||||||||
Advertising
|
9,034 | 9,398 | 8,359 | |||||||||
Bank charges and armored carrier service
|
10,619 | 13,494 | 13,357 | |||||||||
Other
|
41,822 | 48,015 | 48,069 | |||||||||
Total store and regional expenses
|
300,241 | 372,954 | 346,049 | |||||||||
Store and regional margin
|
155,491 | 199,230 | 181,804 | |||||||||
Corporate and other expenses:
|
||||||||||||
Corporate expenses
|
53,327 | 70,859 | 68,217 | |||||||||
Other depreciation and amortization
|
3,390 | 3,902 | 3,827 | |||||||||
Interest expense, net
|
31,462 | 44,378 | 43,696 | |||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
31,784 | | | |||||||||
Goodwill impairment and other charges
|
24,301 | | | |||||||||
Unrealized foreign exchange loss (gain)
|
7,551 | | (5,499 | ) | ||||||||
(Proceeds from) provision for litigation settlements
|
(3,256 | ) | 345 | 57,920 | ||||||||
Loss on store closings
|
964 | 993 | 10,340 | |||||||||
Other expense (income), net
|
436 | (626 | ) | (4,898 | ) | |||||||
Income before income taxes
|
5,532 | 79,379 | 8,201 | |||||||||
Income tax provision
|
37,735 | 36,015 | 15,023 | |||||||||
Net (loss) income
|
$ | (32,203 | ) | $ | 43,364 | $ | (6,822 | ) | ||||
Net (loss) income per share:
|
||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | (1.37 | ) | $ | 1.80 | $ | (0.28 | ) | ||||
Diluted
|
$ | (1.37 | ) | $ | 1.77 | $ | (0.28 | ) | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||
Basic
|
23,571,203 | 24,106,392 | 24,012,705 | |||||||||
Diluted
|
23,571,203 | 24,563,229 | 24,012,705 |
See accompanying notes.
3
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
(In thousands, except share data)
(In thousands, except share data)
Accumulated |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
Additional |
Comprehensive |
Shareholders |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding |
Paid-in |
Accumulated |
Noncontrolling |
(Loss) |
(Deficit) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | Interest | Income | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2006
|
23,399,107 | $ | 23 | $ | 242,594 | $ | (114,920 | ) | $ | 34,256 | $ | 161,953 | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation
|
2,940 | 2,940 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Flow Hedges
|
4,426 | 4,426 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss
|
(32,203 | ) | (32,203 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss
|
(24,837 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt discount
|
53,916 | 53,916 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secondary stock offering
|
(41 | ) | (41 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock grants
|
25,793 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock vested
|
393 | 393 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised
|
708,900 | 1 | 6,931 | 6,932 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other stock compensation
|
1,583 | 1,583 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2007
|
24,133,800 | 24 | 305,376 | (147,123 | ) | 0 | 41,622 | 199,899 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation
|
302 | 302 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Flow Hedges
|
(7,870 | ) | (7,870 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
43,364 | 43,364 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income
|
35,796 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock grants
|
53,108 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vested portion of granted restricted
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
stock and restricted stock units
|
923 | 923 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised
|
79,544 | 1,055 | 1,055 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement of common stock
|
(37,274 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other stock compensation
|
1,759 | 1,759 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2008
|
24,229,178 | 24 | 309,113 | (103,759 | ) | 0 | 34,054 | 239,432 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation
|
(17,884 | ) | (17,884 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Flow Hedges
|
(8,152 | ) | (8,152 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
(6,822 | ) | (6,822 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income
|
(32,858 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase shares of Optima, S.A.
|
316 | 316 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock grants
|
180,655 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised
|
260,545 | 3,317 | 3,317 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vested portion of granted restricted
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
stock and restricted stock units
|
3,626 | 3,626 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase and retirement of treasury shares
|
(535,799 | ) | (7,492 | ) | (7,492 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement of common stock
|
(31,594 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other stock compensation
|
2,737 | 2,737 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2009
|
24,102,985 | $ | 24 | $ | 311,301 | $ | (110,581 | ) | $ | 316 | $ | 8,018 | $ | 209,078 | ||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes.
4
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | (32,203 | ) | $ | 43,364 | $ | (6,822 | ) | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
14,538 | 20,624 | 19,912 | |||||||||
Non-cash interest cost on 2.875% Senior Convertible Notes
|
8,142 | 8,933 | ||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
31,784 | 97 | | |||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
45,799 | 58,458 | 52,136 | |||||||||
Non-cash stock compensation
|
1,976 | 2,682 | 6,363 | |||||||||
Losses on store closings
|
657 | 518 | 3,232 | |||||||||
Goodwill impairment
|
28,482 | | | |||||||||
Foreign currency loss (gain) on revaluation of debt
|
6,248 | | (5,499 | ) | ||||||||
Deferred tax provision (benefit)
|
1,694 | 5,972 | (10,549 | ) | ||||||||
Other, net
|
(121 | ) | 341 | | ||||||||
Change in assets and liabilities (net of effect of acquisitions):
|
||||||||||||
Increase in loans and other receivables
|
(59,395 | ) | (76,478 | ) | (44,342 | ) | ||||||
Increase in prepaid expenses and other
|
(4,870 | ) | (9,943 | ) | (5,563 | ) | ||||||
Provision for litigation settlements
|
| | 49,219 | |||||||||
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and
other liabilities
|
(5,312 | ) | 26,979 | (7,816 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
29,277 | 80,756 | 59,204 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
(151,216 | ) | (143,428 | ) | (26,219 | ) | ||||||
Additions to property and equipment
|
(19,435 | ) | (23,528 | ) | (15,735 | ) | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(170,651 | ) | (166,956 | ) | (41,954 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Decrease in restricted cash
|
79,736 | 1,014 | | |||||||||
Proceeds from term loans
|
375,000 | | | |||||||||
Proceeds from 2.875% Senior Convertible Notes
|
200,000 | | | |||||||||
Proceeds from termination of cross currency swaps
|
| | 14,353 | |||||||||
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
6,932 | 1,055 | 3,317 | |||||||||
Purchase of company stock
|
| | (7,492 | ) | ||||||||
Other debt payments
|
(3,181 | ) | (4,391 | ) | (3,619 | ) | ||||||
Repayment of 9.75% Senior Notes due 2011
|
(292,424 | ) | (2,179 | ) | | |||||||
Convertible debt refinancing
|
(6,463 | ) | | | ||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in revolving credit facilities
|
(40,359 | ) | 5,243 | (3,762 | ) | |||||||
Payment for secondary public stock offering costs
|
(41 | ) | | | ||||||||
Payment of debt issuance costs
|
(11,842 | ) | (454 | ) | (128 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
307,358 | 288 | 2,669 | |||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
6,308 | 4,681 | (20,031 | ) | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
172,292 | (81,231 | ) | (112 | ) | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
118,653 | 290,945 | 209,714 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 290,945 | $ | 209,714 | $ | 209,602 | ||||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||||||
Interest paid
|
$ | 23,000 | $ | 37,843 | $ | 32,946 | ||||||
Income taxes paid
|
$ | 35,766 | $ | 29,241 | $ | 25,788 |
See accompanying notes.
5
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. | Organization and Business |
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are those of
Dollar Financial Corp. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries
(collectively, the Company). Dollar Financial Corp.
is the parent company of Dollar Financial Group, Inc.
(OPCO). The activities of Dollar Financial Corp.
consist primarily of its investment in OPCO. Dollar Financial
Corp. has no employees or operating activities.
Dollar Financial Corp. is a Delaware corporation incorporated in
April 1990 as DFG Holdings, Inc. The Company operates a store
network through OPCO. The Company, through its subsidiaries,
provides retail financial services to the general public through
a network of 1,206 locations (of which 1,031 are company owned)
operating as Money
Mart®,
The Money Shop, Loan
Mart®,
Insta-Cheques®,
The Check Cashing Store, American Payday Loans, American Check
Casher, Check Casher, Payday Loans, Cash Advance, Cash Advance
USA and We The
People®
in 22 states, Canada, the United Kingdom and the Republic
of Ireland. This network includes 1,157 locations (including
1,031 company-owned) in 15 states, Canada, the United
Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland offering financial services
including check cashing, single-payment consumer loans, sale of
money orders, money transfer services, foreign currency exchange
and various other related services. Also included in this
network is the Companys Poland operation acquired in June
2009 which provides financial services to the general public
through in-home servicing.
On January 28, 2005, as a result of the Companys
initial public offering, its common shares began trading on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol DLLR.
2. | Significant Accounting Policies |
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates
its estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue
recognition, loss reserves, valuation allowance for income taxes
and impairment assessment of goodwill and other intangible
assets. Management bases its estimates on historical experience
and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and
liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Principles
of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Company. All significant intercompany accounts
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Reclassification
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to
current year presentation. These reclassifications have no
effect on net income or stockholders equity.
Revenue
Recognition
With respect to company-operated stores, revenues from the
Companys check cashing, money order sales, money transfer,
bill payment services and other miscellaneous services reported
in other revenues on its statement of operations are all
recognized when the transactions are completed at the
point-of-sale
in the store.
With respect to the Companys franchised locations, the
Company recognizes initial franchise fees upon fulfillment of
all significant obligations to the franchisee. Royalties from
franchisees are recognized as earned. The standard franchise
agreements grant to the franchisee the right to develop and
operate a store and use the
6
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. | Significant Accounting Policies (continued) |
Revenue
Recognition (continued)
associated trade names, trademarks, and service marks within the
standards and guidelines established by the Company. As part of
the franchise agreement, the Company provides certain
pre-opening assistance including site selection and evaluation,
design plans, operating manuals, software and training. After
the franchised location has opened, the Company also provides
updates to the software, samples of certain advertising and
promotional materials and other post-opening assistance that the
Company determines is necessary.
For single-payment consumer loans that the Company makes
directly (company-funded loans), which have terms ranging from 1
to 45 days, revenues are recognized using the interest
method. Loan origination fees are recognized as an adjustment to
the yield on the related loan. The Companys reserve policy
regarding these loans is summarized below in
Company-Funded Consumer Loan Loss Reserves Policy.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash includes cash in stores and demand deposits with financial
institutions. Cash equivalents are defined as short-term, highly
liquid investments both readily convertible to known amounts of
cash and so near maturity that there is insignificant risk of
changes in value because of changes in interest rates.
Loans
Receivable, Net
Unsecured short-term and longer-term installment loans that the
Company originates on its own behalf are reflected on the
balance sheet in loans receivable, net. Loans receivable, net
are reported net of a reserve related to consumer lending as
described below in the company-funded consumer loan loss
reserves policy.
Loans
in Default
Loans in default consist of short-term consumer loans originated
by the Company which are in default status. An allowance for the
defaulted loans receivable is established and charged against
revenue in the period that the loan is placed in default status.
The reserve is reviewed monthly and any additional provision to
the loan loss reserve as a result of historical loan
performance, current and expected collection patterns and
current economic trends is charged against revenues. If the
loans remain in a defaulted status for an extended period of
time, an allowance for the entire amount of the loan is recorded
and the receivable is ultimately charged off.
Other
receivables
Other receivables consist primarily of franchise and other third
party receivables.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which vary
from three to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized
using the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease
term (including renewal options that are reasonably assured) or
the estimated useful life of the related asset.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill is the excess of cost over the fair value of the net
assets of the business acquired. In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is assigned to
reporting units, which we have determined to be our reportable
operating segments of the United States, Canada and the United
Kingdom. The Company also has a corporate reporting unit which
consists of
7
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. | Significant Accounting Policies (continued) |
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets (continued)
costs related to corporate infrastructure, investor relations
and other governance activities. Because of the limited
activities of the corporate reporting unit, no goodwill has been
assisgned. Goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit that
benefit from the synergies arising from each particular business
combination. The determination of the operating segments being
equivalent to the reporting units for goodwill allocation
purposes is based upon our overall approach to managing our
business along operating segment lines, and the consistency of
the operations within each operating segment. Goodwill is
evaluated for impairment on an annual basis on June 30 or
between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change
that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a
reporting unit below its carrying amount. To accomplish this, we
are required to determine the carrying value of each reporting
unit by assigning the assets and liabilities, including the
existing goodwill and intangible assets, to those reporting
units. We are then required to determine the fair value of each
reporting unit and compare it to the carrying amount of the
reporting unit. To the extent the carrying amount of a reporting
unit exceeded the fair value of the reporting unit, we would be
required to perform a second step to the impairment test, as
this is an indication that the reporting unit goodwill may be
impaired. If the amount of implied goodwill (which is the excess
of the fair value of the reporting unit determined in the first
step over the fair value of the tangible and identifiable
intangible assets of the reporting unit), is less than that
recorded amount of goodwill, a goodwill impairment charge is
recorded for the difference.
For the U.S. reporting unit, the amount of goodwill has
increased significantly since June 30, 2007 primarily due
to the acquisitions of APL and CCS during fiscal 2008. During
2009, the overall fair value of the U.S. reporting unit has
declined based on the Companys internal models; however,
the performance of the two aforementioned acquisitions has
continued to perform above initial expectations and the recent
closure of unprofitable U.S. stores has improved store
margins. Therefore, the fair value of the U.S. reporting
unit, taken as a whole, continues to exceed its carrying value.
The impact of the continued economic downturn, along with any
federal or state regulatory restrictions on our short-term
consumer lending product could reduce the fair value of the
U.S. goodwill below its carrying value at which time we
would be required to perform the second step of the transitional
impairment test, as this is an indication that the reporting
unit goodwill may be impaired.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of reacquired
franchise rights, which are deemed to have an indefinite useful
life and are not amortized.
Non-amortizable
intangibles with indefinite lives are tested for impairment
annually as of December 31, or whenever events or changes
in business circumstances indicate that an asset may be
impaired. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying
amount of the intangible assets with indefinite lives, then an
impairment charge would be recognized to reduce the asset to its
estimated fair value.
We consider this to be one of the critical accounting estimates
used in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements. We estimate the fair value of our reporting units
using a discounted cash flow analysis. This analysis requires us
to make various judgmental assumptions about revenues, operating
margins, growth rates, and discount rates. These assumptions are
based on our budgets, business plans, economic projections,
anticipated future cash flows and marketplace data. Assumptions
are also made for perpetual growth rates for periods beyond our
long term business plan period. We perform our goodwill
impairment test annually as of June 30, and our reacquired
franchise rights impairment test annually as of
December 31. At the date of our last evaluations, there was
no impairment of goodwill or reacquired franchise rights.
However, we may be required to evaluate the recoverability of
goodwill and other intangible assets prior to the required
annual assessment if we experience a significant disruption to
our business, unexpected significant declines in our operating
results, divestiture of a significant component of our business,
a sustained decline in market capitalization, particularly if it
falls below our book value, or a significant change to the
regulatory
8
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. | Significant Accounting Policies (continued) |
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets (continued)
environment in which we operate. While we believe we have made
reasonable estimates and assumptions to calculate the fair value
of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, it is
possible a material change could occur, including if actual
experience differs from the assumptions and considerations used
in our analyses. These differences could have a material adverse
impact on the consolidated results of operations, and cause us
to perform the second step impairment test, which could result
in a material impairment of our goodwill. We will continue to
monitor our actual cash flows and other factors that may trigger
a future impairment in the light of the current global recession.
Debt
Issuance Costs
Debt issuance costs are amortized using the effective yield
method over the remaining term of the related debt (see
Note 7).
Store
and Regional Expenses
The direct costs incurred in operating the Companys stores
have been classified as store expenses. Store expenses include
salaries and benefits of store and regional employees, rent and
other occupancy costs, depreciation of property and equipment,
bank charges, armored carrier services, returned checks, net and
cash shortages, advertising, telephone and telecommunication and
other costs incurred by the stores. Excluded from store
operations are the corporate expenses of the Company, which
include salaries and benefits of corporate employees,
professional fees and travel costs.
Company-Funded
Consumer Loan Loss Reserves Policy
The Company maintains a loan loss reserve for anticipated losses
for consumer loans the Company makes directly through its
company-operated locations. To estimate the appropriate level of
loan loss reserves, the Company considers known relevant
internal and external factors that affect loan collectability,
including the amount of outstanding loans owed to the Company,
historical loans charged off, current collection patterns and
current economic trends. The Companys current loan loss
reserve is based on its net charge-offs, typically expressed as
a percentage of loan amounts originated for the last twelve
months applied against the principal balance of outstanding
loans that the Company makes directly. As these conditions
change, the Company may need to make additional allowances in
future periods.
When a loan is originated, the customer receives the cash
proceeds in exchange for a post-dated check or a written
authorization to initiate a charge to the customers bank
account on the stated maturity date of the loan. If the check or
the debit to the customers account is returned from the
bank unpaid, the loan is placed in default status and an
allowance for this defaulted loan receivable is established and
charged against revenue in the period that the loan is placed in
default status. This reserve is reviewed monthly and any
additional provision to the loan loss reserve as a result of
historical loan performance, current collection patterns and
current economic trends is charged against revenues. If the
loans remain in defaulted status for an extended period of time
an allowance for the entire amount of the loan is recorded and
the receivable is ultimately charged off.
Check
Cashing Returned Item Policy
The Company charges operating expense for losses on returned
checks during the period in which such checks are returned.
Recoveries on returned checks are credited to operating expense
in the period during which recovery is made. This direct method
for recording returned check losses and recoveries eliminates
the
9
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. | Significant Accounting Policies (continued) |
need for an allowance for returned checks. The net expense for
bad checks included in returned checks, net and cash shortages
in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations was
$13.1 million, $16.4 million and $12.5 million
for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, which represents 0.3%, 0.3% and 0.3% of the total
face amount of checks cashed during each respective year.
Income
Taxes
The Company uses the liability method to account for income
taxes. Accordingly, deferred income taxes have been determined
by applying current tax rates to temporary differences between
the amount of assets and liabilities determined for income tax
and financial reporting purposes.
The Company intends to reinvest its foreign earnings and as a
result the Company has not provided a deferred tax liability on
foreign earnings.
A valuation allowance is provided on deferred tax assets if it
is determined that it is more likely than not that the asset
will not be realized.
Advertising
Costs
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising
costs charged to expense were $10.0 million,
$10.8 million and $8.8 million for the years ended
June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of the Term Loan Facilities is calculated as the
sum of the present value of all contractual cash flows. The fair
value of the Companys 2.875% Senior Convertible Notes
due 2027 (Convertible Notes) are based on broker
quotations. The Companys financial instruments consist of
cash and cash equivalents, loan and other consumer lending
receivables, which are short-term in nature and their fair value
approximates their carrying value.
The total fair value of the Dollar Financial Corp.
2.875% Senior Convertible Notes due 2027 was approximately
$135.5 million at June 30, 2008 and
$138.5 million at June 30, 2009. The total fair value
of the Canadian Term Facility was approximately
$226.9 million at June 30, 2009. The total fair value
of the U.K. Term Facility was $65.6 million at
June 30, 2009.
The fair value of loans receivable approximates book value due
to the short-term nature of the Companys loans.
Derivatives
Put
Options
Operations in the United Kingdom and Canada have exposed the
Company to shifts in currency valuations. From time to time, the
Company purchases put options in order to protect aspects of the
Companys operations in the United Kingdom and Canada
against foreign currency fluctuations. Out of the money put
options are generally used because they cost less than
completely averting risk using at the money put options, and the
maximum loss is limited to the purchase price of the contracts.
The Company has designated the purchased put options as cash
flow hedges of the foreign exchange risk associated with the
forecasted purchases of foreign-currency-denominated investment
securities. These cash flow hedges have maturities of less than
twelve months. For derivative instruments that are designated
and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portions of the
gain or loss on the derivative instrument are initially recorded
in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate
component of shareholders equity and are subsequently
reclassified into earnings in the period during which the hedged
transaction is recognized in earnings.
10
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. | Significant Accounting Policies (continued) |
Derivatives
(continued)
Any ineffective portion of the gain or loss is reported in
corporate expenses on the statement of operations. For options
designated as hedges, hedge effectiveness is measured by
comparing the cumulative change in the hedge contract with the
cumulative change in the hedged forecasted transactions, both of
which are based on forward rates.
Cross-Currency
Interest Rate Swaps
The Company entered into cross-currency interest rate swaps to
protect against changes in cash flows attributable to changes in
both the benchmark interest rate and foreign exchange rates on
its foreign denominated variable rate term loan borrowing under
the Companys credit agreement. Under the terms of these
swaps, the Company pays a fixed rate and receives a variable
rate.
Consistent with the debt payments, on a quarterly basis, all of
the cross-currency interest rate swap agreements call for the
exchange of 0.25% of the original notional amounts. Upon
maturity, these cross-currency interest rate swap agreements
call for the exchange of the remaining notional amounts. The
Company has designated these derivative contracts as cash flow
hedges for accounting purposes. The Company records foreign
exchange re-measurement gains and losses related to the term
loans and also records the changes in fair value of the
cross-currency swaps each period in corporate expenses in the
Companys consolidated statements of operations. Because
these derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges, the
Company records the effective portion of the after-tax gain or
loss in other comprehensive income, which is subsequently
reclassified to earnings in the same period that the hedged
transactions affect earnings.
On May 7, 2009, the Company executed an early settlement of
its two cross-currency interest rate swaps hedging variable-rate
borrowings at its foreign subsidiary in the United Kingdom. As a
result, the Company discontinued prospectively hedge accounting
on these cross-currency swaps. In accordance with the provisions
of SFAS 133, the Company will continue to report the net
gain or loss related to the discontinued cash flow hedge in the
other comprehensive income section of stockholders equity
and will subsequently reclassify such amounts into earnings over
the remaining original term of the derivative as the originally
hedged forecasted transactions are recognized in earnings.
Foreign
Currency Translation and Transactions
The Company operates check cashing and financial services
outlets in Canada and the United Kingdom. The financial
statements of these foreign businesses have been translated into
U.S. dollars in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. All balance sheet accounts are
translated at the current exchange rate at each period end and
income statement items are translated at the average exchange
rate for the period; resulting translation adjustments are made
directly to a separate component of shareholders equity.
Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions is
included in other expense (income), net. Gains and losses
resulting from the revaluation of non-functional denominated
debt is included in unrealized foreign exchange loss (gain).
Earnings
per Share
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.
Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing net income
by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding,
after adjusting for the dilutive effect of stock options. The
11
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. | Significant Accounting Policies (continued) |
Earnings
per Share (continued)
following table presents the reconciliation of the numerator and
denominator used in the calculation of basic and diluted
earnings per share (in thousands):
Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | (32,203 | ) | $ | 43,364 | $ | (6,822 | ) | ||||
Reconciliation of denominator:
|
||||||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
basic(1)
|
23,571 | 24,106 | 24,013 | |||||||||
Effect of dilutive stock options(2)
|
| 429 | | |||||||||
Effect of unvested restricted stock and restricted stock unit
grants(2)
|
| 28 | | |||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
diluted
|
23,571 | 24,563 | 24,013 | |||||||||
(1) | Excludes 111, 52 and 105 shares of unvested restricted stock, which are included in total outstanding common shares as of June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. The dilutive effect of restricted stock is included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share using the treasury stock method. | |
(2) | The effect of dilutive stock options was determined under the treasury stock method. Due to the net loss during fiscal 2007, the effect of the dilutive options and unvested shares of restricted stock and restricted stock unit grants were considered to be anti-dilutive, and therefore were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share. |
Stock
Based Employee Compensation
Effective July 1, 2005 the Company adopted the fair value
method of accounting for stock-based compensation arrangements
in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payments (SFAS 123R), using the modified
prospective method of transition. Under the provisions of
SFAS 123R, the estimated fair value of share based awards
is recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes Model to estimate the fair
value of each option on the date of grant. The Black-Scholes
Model estimates the fair value of employee stock options using a
pricing model which takes into consideration the exercise price
of the option, the expected life of the options, the current
market price and its expected volatility, the expected dividends
on the stock and the current risk-free interest rate for the
expected life of the option. Using the modified prospective
method, compensation expense is recognized beginning with the
effective date of adoption of SFAS 123R for all shares
granted after the effective date of adoption and granted prior
to the effective date of adoption and that remain unvested on
the date of adoption. The Company grants stock options to
employees with an exercise price equal to the fair value of the
shares at the date of grant. The fair value of restricted stock
and restricted stock units are equivalent to the market value on
the date of grant and are amortized over the requisite service
period.
Compensation expense related to share-based compensation
included in the statement of operations for the years ended
June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 was $1.5 million,
$2.6 million and $4.1 million, respectively, net of
related tax effects.
12
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. | Significant Accounting Policies (continued) |
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position APB
14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be
Settled Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)
(FSP APB
14-1).
FSP APB
14-1,
requires the initial proceeds from convertible debt that may be
settled in cash to be bifurcated between a liability component
and an equity component. The objective of the guidance is to
require the liability and equity components of convertible debt
to be separately accounted for in a manner such that the
interest expense recorded on the convertible debt would not
equal the contractual rate of interest on the convertible debt
but instead would be recorded at a rate that would reflect the
issuers conventional debt borrowing rate. This is
accomplished through the creation of a discount on the debt that
would be accreted using the effective interest method as
additional non-cash interest expense over the period the debt is
expected to remain outstanding. The provisions of FSP APB
14-1 are
effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2009 and
are required to be applied retroactively to all periods
presented. FSP APB
14-1,
impacts the accounting for the 2.875% Senior Convertible
Notes due 2027 and results in additional interest expense of
approximately $7.8 million and $8.6 million in fiscal
years 2008 and 2009, respectively. Also, the Company
reduced, its debt balance by recording a debt discount of
approximately $55.8 million, with an offsetting increase to
additional paid in capital as of June 30, 2007. Such amount will be amortized over
the remaining expected life of the debt.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS 160). This Statement amends ARB
No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for
the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest
in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in
the consolidated financial statements. Additionally, this
Statement requires that consolidated net income include the
amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling
interest. SFAS 160 is effective for the Company beginning
July 1, 2009. With purchase of 76% of Optima S.A. in June
2009 this statement impacts the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
The Company adopted FSP APB 14-1 and SFAS 160 on July 1, 2009. The consolidated financial statements presented herein
have been adjusted to reflect the retrospective application of FSP APB 14-1 and SFAS 160. With the adoption of FSP APB 14-1
and SFAS 160, the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Operations were retrospectively
adjusted as follows:
Consolidated Balance Sheets
June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||
As Previously | ||||||||||||
Reported | Adjustment | As Adjusted | ||||||||||
Debt issuance costs, net |
15,108 | (1,511 | ) | 13,597 | ||||||||
Long-term debt |
574,017 | (47,618 | ) | 526,399 | ||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
255,197 | 53,916 | 309,113 | |||||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(95,950 | ) | (7,809 | ) | (103,759 | ) |
June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||
As Previously | ||||||||||||
Reported | Adjustment | As Adjusted | ||||||||||
Debt issuance costs, net |
11,044 | (1,175 | ) | 9,869 | ||||||||
Long-term debt |
569,110 | (38,685 | ) | 530,425 | ||||||||
Other non-current liabilities |
25,508 | (316 | ) | 25,192 | ||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
257,385 | 53,916 | 311,301 | |||||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(94,175 | ) | (16,406 | ) | (110,581 | ) | ||||||
Non controlling interests |
| 316 | 316 |
13
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. | Significant Accounting Policies (continued) |
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Year Ended June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||
As Previously | ||||||||||||
Reported | Adjustment | As Adjusted | ||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
$ | 36,569 | $ | 7,809 | $ | 44,378 | ||||||
Net income |
51,173 | (7,809 | ) | 43,364 | ||||||||
Net income per share: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
2.12 | (0.32 | ) | 1.80 | ||||||||
Diluted |
2.08 | (0.31 | ) | 1.77 |
Year Ended June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||
As Previously | ||||||||||||
Reported | Adjustment | As Adjusted | ||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
$ | 35,099 | $ | 8,597 | $ | 43,696 | ||||||
Net income (loss) |
1,775 | (8,597 | ) | (6,822 | ) | |||||||
Net income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
0.07 | (0.35 | ) | (0.28 | ) | |||||||
Diluted |
0.07 | (0.35 | ) | (0.28 | ) |
The restated debt and equity components recognized for the Companys convertible notes as of June 30, 2009 were as
follows:
Principal amount of convertible notes |
$ | 200,000 | ||
Unamortized discount (1) |
38,685 | |||
Net carrying amount |
161,315 |
(1) | Remaining recognition period of 3.5 years as of June 30, 2009 |
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157), which addresses how companies
should measure fair value when they are required to use a fair
value measurement for recognition or disclosure purposes under
generally accepted accounting principles. As a result of
SFAS 157, there is now a common definition of fair value to
be used throughout U.S. GAAP. This new standard makes the
measurement for fair value more consistent and comparable and
improves disclosures about those measures. The Company adopted
the provisions of SFAS 157 on July 1, 2008.
On February 15, 2007, the FASB issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value
Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115 (SFAS 159). This standard
permits an entity to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. Most of the
provisions in SFAS 159 are elective; however, the amendment
to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities, applies to all entities with
available-for-sale
and trading securities. The fair value option established by
SFAS 159 permits all entities to choose to measure eligible
items at fair value at specified election dates. A business
entity reports unrealized gains and losses on items for which
the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each
subsequent reporting date. The fair value option: (a) may
be applied instrument by instrument, with a few exceptions, such
as investments otherwise accounted for by the equity method;
(b) is irrevocable (unless a new election date occurs); and
(c) is applied only to entire instruments and not to
portions of instruments. The provisions of SFAS 159 became
effective for the Company on July 1, 2008. The Company did
not elect the fair value measurement option under SFAS 159
for any of its financial assets or liabilities and, as a result,
there was no impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 141R, Business Combinations (a
revision of Statement No. 141),
(SFAS 141R). This Statement applies to all
transactions or other events in which an entity obtains control
of one or more businesses, including those combinations achieved
without the transfer of consideration. This Statement retains
the fundamental requirements in Statement No. 141 that the
acquisition method of accounting be used for all business
combinations. This Statement expands the scope to include all
business combinations and requires an acquirer to recognize the
assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree at their fair values as of the
acquisition date. Additionally, SFAS 141R changes the way
entities account for business combinations achieved in stages by
requiring the identifiable assets and liabilities to be measured
at their full fair values. This Statement is effective on a
prospective basis for business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first
annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15,
2008, which is July 1, 2009 for the Company. However, the
provisions of this Statement
14
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. | Significant Accounting Policies (continued) |
that amend FASB Statement
No. 109 and Interpretation No. 48, will be applied
prospectively as of the adoption date and will apply to business
combinations with acquisition dates before the effective date of
SFAS 141R.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161).
SFAS 161 applies to all derivative instruments and related
hedged items accounted for under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 133. SFAS 161 requires
(1) qualitative disclosures about objectives for using
derivatives by primary underlying risk exposure and by purpose
or strategy, (2) information about the volume of derivative
activity in a flexible format that the preparer believes is the
most relevant and practicable, (3) tabular disclosures
about balance sheet location and gross fair value amounts of
derivative instruments, income statement and other comprehensive
income location and amounts of gains and losses on derivative
instruments by type of contract and (4) disclosures about
credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative
agreements. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 161
on January 1, 2009.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
SFAS 107-b,
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments (FSP
SFAS 107-b).
The FSP amends FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures
about Fair Values of Financial Instruments, to require
disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim
financial statements as well as in annual financial statements.
FSP
SFAS 107-b
is effective for interim periods ending after June 15,
2009, but early adoption is permitted for interim periods ending
after March 15, 2009. The Company plans to adopt FSP
SFAS 107-b
and provide the additional disclosure requirements for its first
quarter 2010.
In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 165, Subsequent Events
(SFAS 165). Under SFAS 165, requires companies to
evaluate events and transactions that occur after the balance
sheet date but before the date the financial statements are
issued, or available to be issued in the case of non-public
entities. SFAS 165 requires entities to recognize in the
financial statements the effect of all events or transactions
that provide additional evidence of conditions that existed at
the balance sheet date, including the estimates inherent in the
financial preparation process. Entities shall not recognize the
impact of events or transactions that provide evidence about
conditions that did not exist at the balance sheet date but
arose after that date. SFAS 165, also requires entities to
disclose the date through which subsequent events have been
evaluated. SFAS 165 is effective for interim and annual
reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company
adopted the provisions of SFAS 165 for the year ended
June 30, 2009, as required, the adoption did not have a
material impact on the Companys financial statements. The
Company has evaluated
15
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. | Significant Accounting Policies (continued) |
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
subsequent events from the balance sheet date through
September 3, 2009, and determined there are no material
transactions to disclose.
In June, 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 168 (SFAS 168) Accounting
Standards
Codificationtm
and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles a replacement of FASB Statement
No. 162. SFAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting
Standards
Codificationtm
as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized
by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the
preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP.
FAS 168 will be effective for financial statements issued
for interim and annual periods ending after September 15,
2009, for most entities. On the effective date, all non-SEC
accounting and reporting standards will be superseded. The
Company will adopt SFAS 168 for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2009, as required, and adoption is not
expected to have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
3. | Supplementary Cash Flow Information |
Non-Cash
Transactions
On July 21, 2006, the Company wrote-off $1.5 million
of unamortized deferred issuance costs related to the
$70.0 million principal repayment of OPCOs
9.75% Senior Notes due 2011 (Notes). On
October 30, 2006, the Company wrote-off $7.2 million
of unamortized deferred issuance costs related to the
$198.0 million principal redemption of the Notes. In fiscal
2007, the Company wrote-off $28.5 million of goodwill and
other intangibles related to the reorganization of WTP. During
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company accrued
$57.4 million in relation to the pending Ontario settlement
and for the potential settlement of certain of the similar class
action proceedings pending in other Canadian provinces.
4. | Stock Based Compensation Plan |
The Companys 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the 1999
Plan) states that 784,392 shares of its common stock
may be awarded to directors, employees or consultants of the
Company. The awards, at the discretion of the Companys
Board of Directors, may be issued as nonqualified stock options
or incentive stock options. Stock appreciation rights
(SARs) may also be granted in tandem with the
non-qualified stock options or the incentive stock options.
Exercise of the SARs cancels the option for an equal number of
shares and exercise of the non-qualified stock options or
incentive stock options cancels the SARs for an equal number of
shares. The number of shares issued under the 1999 Plan is
subject to adjustment as specified in the 1999 Plan provisions.
No options may be granted after February 15, 2009. All
options granted under the 1999 Plan became 100% exercisable in
conjunction with the Companys Initial Public Offering on
January 28, 2005.
The Companys 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2005
Plan) states that 1,718,695 shares of its common
stock may be awarded to employees or consultants of the Company.
The awards, at the discretion of the Companys Board of
Directors, may be issued as nonqualified stock options,
incentive stock options or restricted stock awards. The number
of shares issued under the 2005 Plan is subject to adjustment as
specified in the 2005 Plan provisions. No options may be granted
after January 24, 2015.
On November 15, 2007, at the Companys 2007 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, the stockholders adopted the
Companys 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2007
Plan). The 2007 Plan provides for the grant of stock
options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, restricted
stock unit awards and performance awards (collectively, the
Awards) to officers, employees, non-employee members
of the Board, independent consultants and contractors of the
Company and any parent or subsidiary of the Company. The maximum
16
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
4. | Stock Based Compensation Plan (continued) |
aggregate number of shares of the Companys common stock
that may be issued pursuant to Awards granted under the 2007
Plan is 2,500,000; provided, however, that no more than
1,250,000 shares of the Companys common stock may be
awarded as restricted stock or restricted stock unit Awards. The
shares of the Companys common stock that may be issued
under the 2007 Plan may be authorized, but unissued, or
reacquired shares of common stock. No grantee may receive an
Award relating to more than 500,000 shares of the
Companys common stock in the aggregate per fiscal year
under the 2007 Plan.
Stock options and stock appreciation rights granted under the
aforementioned plans have an exercise price equal to the closing
price of the Companys common stock on the date of grant.
To date no stock appreciation rights have been granted.
The following table presents information on stock options:
Weighted |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted |
Average |
|||||||||||||||
Average |
Contractual |
Aggregate |
||||||||||||||
Exercise |
Term |
Intrinsic |
||||||||||||||
Price | (years) | Value | ||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Options outstanding at June 30, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||
(1,622,642 shares exercisable)
|
1,715,142 | $ | 12.07 | |||||||||||||
Granted
|
310,375 | $ | 21.96 | |||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(708,900 | ) | $ | 9.78 | ||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(19,017 | ) | $ | 19.30 | ||||||||||||
Options outstanding at June 30, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||
(1,020,716 shares exercisable)
|
1,297,600 | $ | 15.58 | |||||||||||||
Granted
|
383,680 | $ | 18.12 | |||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(79,544 | ) | $ | 13.25 | ||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(59,373 | ) | $ | 17.68 | ||||||||||||
Options outstanding at June 30, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(1,028,778 shares exercisable)
|
1,542,363 | $ | 16.25 | |||||||||||||
Granted
|
457,723 | $ | 8.49 | |||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(260,545 | ) | $ | 12.73 | ||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(164,357 | ) | $ | 16.42 | ||||||||||||
Options outstanding at June 30, 2009
|
1,575,184 | $ | 14.56 | 7.8 | $ | 3.0 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at June 30, 2009
|
911,623 | $ | 16.37 | 6.8 | $ | 0.7 | ||||||||||
The aggregate intrinsic value in the above table reflects the
total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the
Companys closing stock price on the last trading day of
the period and the exercise price of the options, multiplied by
the number of
in-the-money
stock options) that would have been received by the option
holders had all option holders exercised their options on
June 30, 2009. The intrinsic value of the Companys
stock options changes based on the closing price of the
Companys stock. The total intrinsic value of options
exercised for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009
was $13.2 million, $1.1 million and $1.5 million,
respectively. As of June 30, 2009 the total unrecognized
compensation to be recognized over an estimated weighted-average
period of 1.9 years related to stock options is expected to
be $2.2 million. Cash received from stock options exercised
for the twelve months ended June 30, 2008 and 2009 was
$1.1 million and $3.3 million, respectively.
17
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
4. | Stock Based Compensation Plan (continued) |
The weighted average fair value of each employee option grant
was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions used for grants during the fiscal years ended 2007,
2008 and 2009:
Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Expected volatility
|
48.3 | % | 51.0 | % | 49.6 | % | ||||||
Expected life (years)
|
6.0 | 6.0 | 5.8 | |||||||||
Risk-free interest rate
|
4.68 | % | 3.68 | % | 2.51 | % | ||||||
Expected dividends
|
None | None | None | |||||||||
Weighted average fair value
|
$ | 11.47 | $ | 9.50 | $ | 4.12 |
Restricted stock awards granted under the 2005 Plan become
vested (i) upon the Company attaining certain annual
pre-tax earnings targets (performance-based) and,
(ii) after a designated period of time
(time-based), which is generally three years.
Compensation expense is recorded ratably over the requisite
service period based upon an estimate of the likelihood of
achieving the performance goals. Compensation expense related to
restricted stock awards is measured based on the fair value
using the closing market price of the Companys common
stock on the date of the grant.
Information concerning restricted stock awards is as follows:
Restricted |
Weighted |
|||||||
Stock |
Average |
|||||||
Awards | Price | |||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2006
|
107,841 | $ | 18.36 | |||||
Granted
|
36,924 | $ | 24.36 | |||||
Vested
|
(22,483 | ) | $ | 20.25 | ||||
Forfeited
|
(11,131 | ) | $ | 18.36 | ||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2007
|
111,151 | $ | 19.97 | |||||
Granted
|
12,481 | $ | 29.42 | |||||
Vested
|
(50,028 | ) | $ | 19.72 | ||||
Forfeited
|
(21,299 | ) | $ | 21.36 | ||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2008
|
52,305 | $ | 21.90 | |||||
Granted
|
96,752 | $ | 9.38 | |||||
Vested
|
(40,553 | ) | $ | 20.57 | ||||
Forfeited
|
(3,046 | ) | $ | 18.49 | ||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2009
|
105,458 | $ | 11.03 | |||||
Restricted Stock Unit awards (RSUs) granted under the 2005 Plan
and 2007 Plan become vested after a designated period of time
(time-based), which is generally on a quarterly
basis over three years. Compensation expense is recorded ratably
over the requisite service period. Compensation expense related
to RSUs is measured based on the fair value using the closing
market price of the Companys common stock on the date of
the grant.
18
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
4. | Stock Based Compensation Plan (continued) |
Information concerning restricted stock unit awards is as
follows:
Restricted |
Weighted |
|||||||
Stock Unit |
Average |
|||||||
Awards | Grant | |||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2006
|
| $ | | |||||
Granted
|
124,438 | $ | 28.53 | |||||
Vested
|
| $ | | |||||
Forfeited
|
| $ | | |||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2007
|
124,438 | $ | 28.53 | |||||
Granted
|
163,595 | $ | 18.49 | |||||
Vested
|
(39,818 | ) | $ | 28.35 | ||||
Forfeited
|
(21,413 | ) | $ | 28.53 | ||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2008
|
226,802 | $ | 21.32 | |||||
Granted
|
306,336 | $ | 7.88 | |||||
Vested
|
(102,883 | ) | $ | 21.81 | ||||
Forfeited
|
(16,329 | ) | $ | 21.12 | ||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2009
|
413,926 | $ | 11.25 | |||||
As of June 30, 2009, there was $4.9 million of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted
share-based compensation arrangements granted under the plans.
That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average
period of 1.3 years. The total fair value of shares vested
during twelve months ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 was
$0.5 million $2.1 million and $3.1 million,
respectively.
5. | Employee Retirement Plans |
Retirement benefits are provided to substantially all
U.S. full-time employees who have completed
1,000 hours of service through a defined contribution
retirement plan. The Company will match 50% of each
employees contribution, up to 8% of the employees
compensation. In addition, a discretionary contribution may be
made if the Company meets its financial objectives. The
Companys foreign subsidiaries offer similar plans, the
terms of which vary based on statutory requirements.
Total contributions charged to expense were $1.1 million,
$1.3 million and $1.2 million for the years ended
June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Effective December 31, 2004, the Company established the
Dollar Financial Corp. Deferred Compensation Plan (the
Plan). The Plans primary purpose is to provide
tax-advantageous asset accumulation for a select group of
management and highly compensated employees. Eligible employees
may elect to defer up to fifty percent of base salary
and/or one
hundred percent of bonus earned. The Administrator, persons
appointed by the Companys Board of Directors, may further
limit the minimum or maximum amount deferred by any
Participants, for any reason.
During fiscal 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors approved discretionary contributions to the Plan in
the amount of $1.8 million. Contributions to the plan
become vested (i) upon the Company attaining annual pre-tax
earnings targets and, (ii) after a designated period of
time, which is between 24 and 36 months. Compensation
expense is recorded ratably over the service period based upon
an estimate of the likelihood of achieving the performance goals.
19
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
5. | Employee Retirement Plans (continued) |
During fiscal 2007, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors approved discretionary contributions to the Plan in
the amount of $1.1 million. Each such award was granted
July 1, 2007 and vests ratably on an annual basis over a
three-year period if, and only if, the Company attains certain
strategic objectives as established by the Board of Directors
for each fiscal year during the three-year period. The Company
attained those strategic objectives for fiscal years 2008 and
2009.
There were no discretionary contributions to the Plan approved
by the Board of Directors during fiscal years 2008 and 2009.
Compensation expense related to discretionary contributions was
$0.6, $0.8 million and $0.7 million for the years
ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
6. | Property and Equipment |
Property and equipment at June 30, 2008 and 2009 consist of
(in thousands):
June 30, | ||||||||
2008 | 2009 | |||||||
Land
|
$ | 189 | $ | 156 | ||||
Leasehold improvements
|
67,308 | 61,986 | ||||||
Equipment and furniture
|
98,838 | 96,275 | ||||||
166,335 | 158,417 | |||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
(98,302 | ) | (99,803 | ) | ||||
Property and equipment, net
|
$ | 68,033 | $ | 58,614 | ||||
Depreciation expense amounted to $12.8 million,
$17.6 million and $16.9 million for the years ended
June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
7. | Debt |
The Company had debt obligations at June 30, 2008 and 2009
as follows (in thousands):
June 30, | ||||||||
2008 | 2009 | |||||||
Revolving credit facility
|
$ | 5,341 | $ | | ||||
Dollar Financial Corp. 2.875% Senior Convertible Notes due
2027
|
152,382 | 161,315 | ||||||
Term loans due October 2012
|
377,863 | 368,722 | ||||||
Other
|
| 6,268 | ||||||
Total debt
|
535,586 | 536,305 | ||||||
Less: current portion of debt
|
(9,187 | ) | (5,880 | ) | ||||
Long-term debt
|
$ | 526,399 | $ | 530,425 | ||||
On July 21, 2006, the Company used the $80.8 million
net proceeds from its follow-on offering of common stock to
redeem $70.0 million principal amount of its outstanding
9.75% senior notes due 2011 (Notes), pay
$6.8 million in redemption premium, pay $1.3 million
in accrued interest and use the remaining $2.6 million for
working capital purposes.
On September 14, 2006, OPCO commenced a cash tender offer
for any and all of its outstanding $200.0 million aggregate
principal amount of the Companys 9.75% senior notes
due 2011 on the terms and
20
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
7. | Debt (continued) |
subject to the conditions set forth in its Offer to Purchase and
Consent Solicitation Statement dated September 14, 2006 and
the related Consent and Letter of Transmittal. In connection
with the tender offer and consent solicitation, OPCO received
the requisite consents from holders of the Notes to approve
certain amendments to the indenture (Amendments)
under which the Notes were issued. The Amendments eliminated
substantially all of the restrictive covenants and certain
events of default. The Amendments to the indenture governing the
Notes are set forth in a Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as
of October 27, 2006 among OPCO, certain of OPCOs
direct and indirect subsidiaries, as guarantors, and
U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee,
(Supplemental Indenture), and became operative and
binding on the holders of the Notes as of October 30, 2006,
in connection with the closing of the credit facilities,
explained below, and the acceptance of the Notes tendered
pursuant to the tender offer.
The total consideration for the Notes tendered and accepted for
purchase pursuant to the tender offer was determined as
specified in the tender offer documents, on the basis of a yield
to the first redemption date for the Notes equal to the sum of
(i) the yield (based on the bid side price) of the 3.00%
U.S. Treasury Security due November 15, 2007, as
calculated by Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC in accordance
with standard market practice on the price determination date,
as described in the tender offer documents, plus (ii) a
fixed spread of 50 basis points. OPCO paid accrued and
unpaid interest up to, but not including, the applicable payment
date, October 30, 2006. Each holder who validly tendered
its Notes and delivered consents on or prior to 5:00 p.m.,
New York City time, on September 27, 2006 was entitled to a
consent payment, which was included in the total consideration
set forth above, of $30 for each $1,000 principal amount of
Notes tendered by such holder to the extent such Notes were
accepted for purchase pursuant to the terms of the tender offer
and consent solicitation. Holders who tendered Notes were
required to consent to the Amendments. The total principal
amount of the Notes tendered was $198.0 million.
On November 15, 2007, the Company redeemed the remaining
$2.0 million principal of the Notes at a redemption price
of 104.875%, plus accrued and unpaid interest in the amount of
$0.1 million.
Refinancing
of Existing Credit Facility
On October 30, 2006, the Company completed the refinancing
of its existing credit facilities and entered into a new
$475.0 million credit facility (New Credit
Agreement). The New Credit Agreement is comprised of the
following: (i) a senior secured revolving credit facility
in an aggregate amount of USD 75.0 million (the
U.S. Revolving Facility) with OPCO as the
borrower; (ii) a senior secured term loan facility with an
aggregate amount of USD 295.0 million (the
Canadian Term Facility) with National Money Mart
Company, a wholly-owned Canadian indirect subsidiary of OPCO, as
the borrower; (iii) a senior secured term loan facility
with Dollar Financial U.K. Limited, a wholly-owned U.K. indirect
subsidiary of OPCO, as the borrower, in an aggregate amount of
USD 80.0 million (consisting of a
USD 40.0 million tranche of term loans and another
tranche of term loans equivalent to USD 40.0 million
denominated in Euros) (the UK Term Facility) and
(iv) a senior secured revolving credit facility in an
aggregate amount of C$28.5 million (the Canadian
Revolving Facility) with National Money Mart Company as
the borrower.
On October 30, 2006, National Money Mart Company borrowed
USD 170.0 million under the Canadian Term Facility,
Dollar Financial U.K. borrowed USD 80.0 million under
the U.K. Term Facility and OPCO borrowed
USD 14.6 million under the US Revolving Facility.
These funds were used to repurchase USD 198.0 million
in aggregate principal amount of the outstanding Notes issued by
OPCO pursuant to the previously discussed cash tender offer and
consent solicitation for all outstanding Notes, to repay the
outstanding principal amounts, accrued interest and expenses
under OPCOs existing credit facility and to pay related
transaction costs. On October 31, 2006, National Money Mart
Company borrowed an additional USD 125.0 million under
the Canadian Term Facility to fund the Canadian Acquisition, as
further described below, and to pay related transaction costs.
21
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
7. | Debt (continued) |
The U.S. Revolving Facility and the Canadian Revolving
Facility have an interest rate of LIBOR plus 300 basis
points and CDOR plus 300 basis points, respectively,
subject to reduction as the Company reduces its leverage. The
Canadian Term Facility consisted of USD 295.0 million
at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 275 basis points. The
U.K. Term Facility consisted of a USD 40.0 million
tranche at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 300 basis points
and a tranche denominated in Euros equivalent to
USD 40.0 million at an interest rate of Euribor plus
300 basis points.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2008, the Companys United
Kingdom subsidiary entered into an overdraft facility
(U.K. Revolving Facility) which provides for a
commitment of up to GBP 5.0 million. Amounts outstanding
under the U.K. Revolver Facility bear interest at a rate of the
Bank base Rate (currently 0.5%) plus 0.5%.
At June 30, 2009 there were no amounts outstanding under
the U.S. Revolving Facility, the Canadian Revolving
Facility nor the U.K. Revolving Facility. At June 30, 2009,
the outstanding amount of the Canadian Term Facility was
USD 286.9 million and the outstanding amount of the
U.K. Term Facility consisted of USD 38.9 million and
EUR 30.6 million. Each term loan will mature on
October 30, 2012, and will amortize in equal quarterly
installments in an amount equal to 0.25% of the original
principal amount of the applicable term loan for the first
twenty-three (23) quarters following funding, with the
outstanding principal balance payable in full on the maturity
date of such term loan. Each revolving facility will mature and
the commitments there under will terminate on October 30,
2011.
The obligations under the U.S. Revolving Facility are
guaranteed by the Company and certain direct and indirect
domestic subsidiaries of the Company. The obligations under the
Canadian Term Facility, the Canadian Revolving Facility and the
U.K. Term Facility are guaranteed by the Company and
substantially all of its domestic and foreign direct and
indirect subsidiaries. The obligations of the respective
borrowers and guarantors under the facilities are secured by
substantially all of the assets of such borrowers and guarantors.
The New Credit Agreement contains certain financial and other
restrictive covenants, which, among other things, requires the
Company to achieve certain financial ratios, limit capital
expenditures, restrict payment of dividends and obtain certain
approvals if the Company wants to increase borrowings. As of
June 30, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all
covenants.
2.875% Senior
Convertible Notes due 2027
On June 27, 2007, the Company issued $200.0 million
aggregate principal amount of Dollar Financial Corp.
2.875% Senior Convertible Notes due 2027 (the
Convertible Notes) in a private offering for resale
to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities
Act). The Company received proceeds of approximately
$193.5 million from the issuance, net of underwriting fees
of approximately $6.4 million. Underwriting fees are
included in issuance costs on the Companys balance sheet
and are amortized to interest expense using the effective
interest rate method over 5.5 years. The Convertible Notes
are general unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of
payment with all of the Companys other existing and future
obligations that are unsecured and unsubordinated. The
Convertible Notes bear interest at the rate of 2.875% per year,
payable every June 30 and December 31 beginning
December 31, 2007. The Convertible Notes mature on
June 30, 2027, unless earlier converted, redeemed or
repurchased by the Company. Holders of the Convertible Notes may
require the Company to repurchase in cash some or all of the
Convertible Notes at any time before the Convertible Notes
maturity following a fundamental change as defined in the
Indenture dated June 27, 2007 (the Indenture).
The Indenture includes a net share settlement
provision that allows the Company, upon redemption or
conversion, to settle the principal amount of the notes in cash
and the additional conversion value, if any, in shares of the
Companys common stock. Holders of the Convertible Notes
may convert their Convertible Notes
22
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
7. | Debt (continued) |
based at an initial conversion rate of 25.7759 shares per
$1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes, subject to
adjustment, prior to stated maturity under the following
circumstances:
| during any calendar quarter commencing after September 30, 2007, if the closing sale price of the Companys common stock is greater than or equal to 130% of the applicable conversion price for at least 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last day of the preceding calendar quarter; | |
| during the five day period following any five consecutive trading day period in which the trading price of the Convertible Notes for each day of such period was less than 98.0% of the product of the closing sale price per share of the Companys common stock on such day and the conversion rate in effect for the Convertible Notes on each such day; | |
| if such notes have been called for redemption; at any time on or after December 31, 2026; or | |
| upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions as described in the Indenture. |
If a fundamental change, as defined in the Indenture, occurs
prior to December 31, 2014 and a holder elects to convert
its Convertible Notes in connection with such transaction, the
Company will pay a make whole provision, as defined in the
Indenture.
On or after December 31, 2012, but prior to
December 31, 2014, the Company may redeem for cash all or
part of the Convertible Notes, if during any period of 30
consecutive trading days ending not later than December 31,
2014, the closing sale price of a share of the Companys
common stock is for at least 120 trading days within such period
of 30 consecutive trading days greater than or equal to 120% of
the conversion price on each such day. On or after
December 31, 2014, the Company may redeem for cash all or
part of the Convertible Notes, upon at least 30 but not more
than 60 days notice before the redemption date by mail to
the trustee, the paying agent and each holder of Convertible
Notes. The amount of cash paid in connection with each such
redemption will be 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to
be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, including any
additional amounts, up to but excluding the redemption date.
Holders have the right to require the Company to purchase all or
a portion of the Notes on December 31, 2012,
December 31, 2014, June 30, 2017 and June 30,
2022 (each of which are referred to as the purchase date). The
purchase price payable will be equal to 100% of the principal
amount of the notes to be purchase plus any accrued and unpaid
interest, including any additional amounts, up to but excluding
the purchase date.
If the Company undergoes a fundamental change, as defined in the
Indenture, before maturity of the Convertible Notes, holders
will have the right, subject to certain conditions, to require
the Company to repurchase for cash all or a portion of the
Convertible Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the
principal amount of the Convertible Notes being repurchased,
plus accrued and unpaid interest, including any additional
amounts, up to but excluding the date of repurchase.
The Company has considered the guidance in Emerging Issues Task
Force (EITF) Abstract
No. 98-5,
Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial
Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion
Ratio
(EITF 98-5),
and has determined that the Convertible Notes do not contain a
beneficial conversion feature, as the fair value of the
Companys common stock on the date of issuance was less
than the initial conversion price.
Upon conversion, the Company will have the option to either
deliver:
1. | cash equal to the lesser of the aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes to be converted ($1,000 per note) or the total conversion value; and shares of the Companys common stock in respect |
23
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
7. | Debt (continued) |
of the remainder, if any, of the conversion value over the principal amount of the Convertible Notes; or |
2. | shares of the Companys common stock to the holders, calculated at the initial conversion price which is subject to any of the conversion price adjustments discussed above at any time before December 31, 2006. |
The Company has made a policy election to settle the principal
amount of the Convertible Notes in cash. As such, in accordance
with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement
No. 128, Earnings per Share
(FAS 128), the Notes will be excluded from
the Companys calculation of diluted earnings per share.
Interest expense, net was $31.5 million, $44.4 million
and $43.7 million for the years ended June 30, 2007,
2008 and 2009, respectively. Included interest expense is $7.8
million and $8.6 million, of non-cash interest related to the
Convertible Notes, for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2009,
respectively.
8. | Income Taxes |
U.S. income taxes have not been provided on the
undistributed earnings of international subsidiaries. The
Companys intention is to reinvest these earnings
indefinitely. The Company believes that any U.S. tax on
repatriated earnings would be substantially offset by
U.S. foreign tax credits and or by use of available net
operating loss carry forwards subject to the limitations under
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. As of
June 30, 2009, there are $129.2 million of
undistributed foreign earnings.
The Companys U.S. and foreign income before income
taxes for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 is
set forth below ( in thousands):
June 30, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | ||||||||||
U.S
|
$ | (70,032 | ) | $ | (11,987 | ) | $ | (33,963 | ) | |||
Foreign
|
75,564 | 91,366 | 42,164 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 5,532 | $ | 79,379 | $ | 8,201 | ||||||
The details of the Companys income tax provision for the
years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 are set forth
below (in thousands):
June 30, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Current:
|
||||||||||||
U.S. Federal
|
$ | | $ | (174 | ) | $ | | |||||
Foreign
|
36,223 | 30,297 | 25,133 | |||||||||
State
|
| 2 | 183 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 36,223 | $ | 30,125 | $ | 25,316 | ||||||
Deferred:
|
||||||||||||
U.S. Federal
|
$ | 589 | $ | 3,314 | $ | 4,865 | ||||||
Foreign
|
923 | 2,576 | (15,158 | ) | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,512 | $ | 5,890 | $ | (10,293 | ) | |||||
Total income tax provision
|
$ | 37,735 | $ | 36,015 | $ | 15,023 | ||||||
24
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
8. | Income Taxes (continued) |
Below is the reconcilation of income tax expense from the
U.S. federal statutory rate to the Companys effective
tax rate for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009
(in thousands):
June 30, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Tax provision at federal statutory rate
|
$ | 1,936 | $ | 27,783 | $ | 2,870 | ||||||
Add(deduct)
|
||||||||||||
State tax provision
|
| 1 | 183 | |||||||||
Canadian withholding
|
521 | 349 | 245 | |||||||||
Effect of foreign operations
|
(9,648 | ) | 2,024 | (2,769 | ) | |||||||
Change in uncertain tax position related to transfer pricing
|
| | (2,853 | ) | ||||||||
Foreign exchange gain
|
| | 3,367 | |||||||||
Other permanent differences
|
(5,158 | ) | (770 | ) | 3,275 | |||||||
Convertible debt discount
|
| 2,850 | 3,126 | |||||||||
UK goodwill amortization
|
| | 536 | |||||||||
Valuation allowance
|
50,084 | 3,778 | 7,043 | |||||||||
Tax provision at effective tax rate
|
$ | 37,735 | $ | 36,015 | $ | 15,023 | ||||||
Prior to the global debt restructuring completed in the
Companys fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, interest
expense in the U.S. resulted in U.S. tax losses, thus
generating deferred tax assets. The Company provided a valuation
allowance against all of its U.S. deferred tax assets at
June 30, 2009 and 2008 which amounted to
$88.5 million and $79.6 million, respectively.
Because realization is not assured, the Company has not recorded
the benefit of the deferred tax assets. As of June 30,
2009, the Company has approximately $106.3 million of
federal net operating loss carry forwards available to offset
future taxable income. The federal net operating loss carry
forwards will begin to expire in 2024, if not utilized. The
Company has foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately
$45.6 million, which will begin to expire in 2017 if not
utilized. Additionally, in fiscal 2007 the Company recorded a
valuation allowance of $1.3 million against a Canadian
foreign currency loss. The loss is capital in nature and at this
time the Company has not identified any potential capital gains
against which to offset the loss.
Additionally, as a result of the adoption of FASB Staff Position APB
14-1 (FSP 14-1), the Company has recorded
a reduction to deferred tax assets of $19.5 million on July 1, 2007.
Since realization of this reduction to deferred tax assets is not assured,
the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against this
deferred tax liability which resulted in a reduction to the
Companys valuation allowance at June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2009
of $16.7 million and $13.5 million respectively.
25
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
8. | Income Taxes (continued) |
The details of the Companys
2007-2009
deferred tax assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2008 and
2009 are set forth below (in thousands):
June 30, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Deferred tax assets
|
||||||||||||
Loss reserves
|
$ | 5,372 | $ | 5,952 | $ | 3,817 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
10,616 | 10,234 | 10,752 | |||||||||
Accrued compensation
|
1,531 | 2,446 | 2,949 | |||||||||
Other accrued expenses
|
3,154 | 1,998 | 18,660 | |||||||||
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
34,718 | 30,070 | 36,964 | |||||||||
Foreign tax credit carryforwards
|
38,569 | 45,705 | 45,590 | |||||||||
Foreign capital loss carryforwards
|
1,411 | 1,473 | 1,290 | |||||||||
Foreign currency swaps
|
3,009 | 11,128 | 9,891 | |||||||||
Other
|
183 | 758 | 516 | |||||||||
Total deferred tax assets
|
98,563 | 109,764 | 130,429 | |||||||||
Valuation Allowance
|
(74,502 | ) | (80,907 | ) | (89,788 | ) | ||||||
Net deferred tax asset
|
$ | 24,061 | $ | 28,857 | $ | 40,641 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities
|
||||||||||||
Amortization and other temporary differences
|
$ | (7,679 | ) | $ | (13,267 | ) | $ | (18,876 | ) | |||
Convertible debt discount
|
(19,516 | ) | (16,666 | ) | (13,540 | ) | ||||||
Foreign currency transactions
|
(5,034 | ) | (9,085 | ) | (71 | ) | ||||||
Total deferred tax liability
|
(32,229 | ) | (39,018 | ) | (32,487 | ) | ||||||
Net deferred tax (liability) asset
|
$ | (8,168 | ) | $ | (10,161 | ) | $ | 8,154 | ||||
For purposes of balance sheet presentation, the deferred tax
liability related to the convertible debt discount has been netted
against the Companys deferred tax asset.
The analysis of the change in the Companys valuation
allowance for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009
is set forth below (in thousands):
June 30, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year
|
$ | (47,517 | ) | $ | (74,502 | ) | $ | (80,907 | ) | |||
(Provision)/benefit
|
(50,084 | ) | (3,778 | ) | (7,042 | ) | ||||||
Other additions/(deductions)
|
23,099 | (2,627 | ) | (1,839 | ) | |||||||
Balance at end of year
|
$ | (74,502 | ) | $ | (80,907 | ) | $ | (89,788 | ) | |||
Foreign, federal and state income taxes of approximately
$35.8 million, $29.2 million and $25.8 million
were paid during the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and
2009, respectively.
The Company believes that its ability to utilize
pre-2007 net operating losses in a given year will be
limited to $9.0 million under Section 382 of the
Internal Revenue Code, which the Company refers to as the Code,
because of changes of ownership resulting from the June 2006
follow-on equity offering. In addition, any future debt or
equity transactions may reduce the Companys net operating
losses or further limit its ability to utilize the net operating
losses under the Code. The deferred tax asset related to excess
foreign tax credits is also fully offset by a valuation
allowance of $45.6 million.
26
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
8. | Income Taxes (continued) |
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on
July 1, 2007. The implementation of FIN 48 did not
result in any adjustment in its liability for unrecognized
income tax benefits. At the adoption date of July 1, 2007,
the Company had unrecognized tax benefit reserves related to
uncertain tax positions of $7.6 million. At June 30,
2008 and 2009 the Company had $9.9 million and
$7.8 million, respectively of unrecognized tax benefits,
primarily related to transfer pricing matters, which if
recognized, would reduce the effective tax rate. It is not
anticipated that any portion of this reserve will reverse in the
next 12 months. The reduction of $2.1 million in the
reserve related to uncertain tax positions was principally
caused by the impact of a favorable Competent Authority
settlement.
The tax years ending June 30, 2005 through 2008 remain open
to examination by the taxing authorities in the United States,
United Kingdom and Canada. The Company just recently settled its
Federal audit with the Internal Revenue Service for fiscal 2007
with only an adjustment to its foreign tax credit carryforward
but no impact on the Companys effective tax rate.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to
uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of
June 30, 2009, the Company had approximately
$0.5 million of accrued interest related to uncertain tax
positions which remained materially unchanged from the prior
year. The provision for unrecognized tax benefits, including
accrued interest, is included in income taxes payable.
A reconciliation of the liability for uncertain tax position for
fiscal 2009 follows:
Balance at July 1, 2008
|
$ | 9,919 | ||
Net decreases due to current year tax positions
|
(2,146 | ) | ||
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
$ | 7,773 | ||
9. | Loss on Extinguishment of Debt |
On June 16, 2006, the Company announced the pricing of an
underwritten follow-on offering of 5,000,000 shares of the
Companys common stock at $16.65 per share. On
June 21, 2006, the Company received $80.8 million in
net proceeds in connection with this follow-on offering, which
on July 21, 2006 were used to redeem $70.0 million
principal amount of the Notes. On October 30, 2006, the
Company completed the refinancing of $198.0 million
principal amount of the Notes and entered into the New Credit
Agreement. On November 15, 2007 the Company redeemed the
remaining $2.0 million principal amount outstanding of the
Notes.
In connection with the redemptions of the aforementioned
outstanding principal amounts of the Companys Notes, the
Company incurred related losses on the extinguishment of debt.
For the periods presented, the loss incurred on the
extinguishment of debt is as follows (in millions):
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Call Premium
|
$ | 6.8 | $ | 0.1 | $ | | ||||||
Write-off of original issue discount, net
|
(1.4 | ) | | | ||||||||
Tender premium
|
17.6 | | | |||||||||
Write-off of previously capitalized deferred issuance costs, net
|
8.8 | | | |||||||||
$ | 31.8 | $ | 0.1 | $ | | |||||||
27
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
10. | Commitments |
The Company has various non-cancelable operating leases for
office and retail space and certain equipment with terms ranging
from one to five years, most of which contain standard optional
renewal clauses. Total rent expense under operating leases
amounted to $27.8 million, $37.0 million and
$36.0 million for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008
and 2009, respectively.
At June 30, 2009, future minimum lease payments for
operating leases are as follows (in thousands):
Year
|
Amount | |||
2010
|
$ | 33,532 | ||
2011
|
27,006 | |||
2012
|
20,991 | |||
2013
|
15,795 | |||
2014
|
11,857 | |||
Thereafter
|
25,897 | |||
$ | 135,078 | |||
11. | Acquisitions |
The following acquisitions have been accounted for under the
purchase method of accounting.
On August 30, 2007, the Company entered into a purchase
agreement to acquire substantially all of the assets of 45
retail stores, operating as Check Casher, American Check Casher,
Cash Advance, American Payday Loans, Cash Advance USA and Payday
Loans (collectively, American Payday Loans or
APL Acquisition). The purchase price was
$29.3 million in cash including $2.0 million in cash
that will be held in escrow for 24 months to secure certain
indemnification claims. The Company anticipates a full return of
the $2.0 million escrow balance. In addition, the agreement
included a maximum revenue-based earn-out of up to
$3.0 million which would have been payable in February
2009, however the provisions of the earn-out were not met.
Between August 2007 and March 2008, we consummated a series of
acquisitions of the 45 stores, which were located in Kansas,
Missouri, Hawaii, Oklahoma, Arizona, Iowa, South Carolina and
Nebraska. The Company allocated a portion of the purchase price
to loans receivable for $4.7 million and other assets for
$2.6 million. A portion of the proceeds from the
$200.0 million senior convertible note offering on
June 27, 2007 were utilized to pay for the APL Acquisition.
The excess purchase price over the preliminary fair value of
identifiable assets acquired was $22.0 million and was
recorded to goodwill.
On December 15, 2007, the Company consummated the
acquisition of substantially all of the assets of 81 financial
services stores and one corporate office in southeast Florida
(the CCS Acquisition) from CCS Financial Services,
Inc. d/b/a/ The Check Cashing Store (CCS). The
acquisition was effected pursuant to the terms of an asset
purchase agreement dated October 11, 2007. The aggregate
purchase price for the acquisition was $102.1 million cash,
including $6.0 million in cash to be held in escrow for
24 months to secure certain indemnification claims. The
Company allocated a portion of the purchase price to loans
receivable for $7.6 million, cash in stores for
$2.1 million, fixed assets for $3.9 million and other
assets for $0.5 million. A portion of the proceeds from the
$200 million senior convertible note offering on
June 27, 2007 was utilized to pay for the CCS Acquisition.
The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the
identifiable assets acquired was $88.0 million and was
recorded as goodwill.
On December 19, 2007, the Company entered into a share
purchase agreement to acquire all of the shares of Cash Your
Cheque, Ltd, a U.K. entity, which operates seven check cashing
and single-payment consumer lending stores. The aggregate
purchase price for the acquisition was approximately
$4.2 million in cash. The Company used excess cash to fund
the acquisition. The Company allocated approximately
$0.6 million to net
28
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
11. | Acquisitions (continued) |
assets acquired. The excess purchase price over the preliminary
fair value of the identifiable assets acquired was
$3.6 million and was recorded as goodwill.
On February 26, 2008, the Company entered into a purchase
agreement to acquire substantially all of the assets of 10
financial stores in Ontario, Canada operating under the name
Unicash. The aggregate purchase price for the acquisition was
$1.4 million cash. The Company used excess cash to fund the
acquisition. The Company allocated approximately
$0.2 million to the net assets acquired. The excess
purchase price over the preliminary fair value of the
identifiable assets acquired was $1.2 million and was
recorded as goodwill.
During fiscal 2008, the Company completed various smaller
acquisitions in Canada and the United Kingdom for an approximate
purchase price of approximately $8.5 million that resulted
in an aggregate increase in goodwill of $4.7 million.
On October 17, 2008, the Company entered in a series of
purchase agreements to acquire substantially all of the assets
of six franchised stores from a franchisee of the Companys
wholly owned United Kingdom subsidiary. The aggregate purchase
price for the acquisitions was approximately $3.3 million
in cash. The Company used excess cash to fund the acquisition.
The company allocated a portion of the purchase price to
identifiable intangible assets, reacquired franchise rights, in
the amount of $2.6 million and other assets in the amount
of $0.7 million. There was no excess purchase price over
the preliminary fair value of identifiable assets acquired.
On April 21, 2009, the Company entered into a purchase
agreement to acquire all of the shares of Express Finance
Limited, a U.K. Internet-based consumer lending business. The
aggregate purchase price for the acquisition was approximately
$6.8 million in cash. In addition, the agreement provides
for an earnings-related contingent consideration amount based on
the results for the two years following the date of acquisition.
No amounts have been recorded for this contingent consideration.
The Company used excess cash to fund the acquisition. The
Company allocated approximately $0.8 million to net assets
acquired including $2.8 million in net loans receivable.
The excess purchase price over the preliminary fair value of the
identifiable assets acquired was $6.0 million and was
recorded as goodwill.
On June 29, 2009, the Company entered into a purchase
agreement to acquire substantially all of the assets of 2 pawn
shops located n Scotland from Robert Biggar Limited. The
aggregate purchase price for the acquisition was approximately
$8.0 million in cash. The Company used excess cash to fund
the acquisition. The Company allocated approximately
$3.7 million to net assets acquired. The excess purchase
price over the preliminary fair value of the identifiable assets
acquired was $4.3 million and was recorded as goodwill.
On June 30, 2009, the Company entered into a purchase
agreement to acquire 76% of the shares of Optima, S.A., a
consumer lending business in Poland. The aggregate purchase
price for the acquisition was approximately $5.6 million in
cash and the assumption of approximately $6.3 million in
debt. The holders of the assumed debt are current shareholders
of Optima. In addition, the agreement provides for an
earnings-related contingent consideration amount based on the
cumulative three year period following the date of acquisition.
No amounts have been recorded for this contingent consideration.
The Company used excess cash to fund the acquisition. The
Company allocated approximately $1.3 million to net assets
acquired including $7.4 million in net loans receivable.
The excess purchase price over the preliminary fair value of the
identifiable assets acquired was $4.6 million and was
recorded as goodwill.
During fiscal 2009, the Company completed various smaller
acquisitions in the United States and the United Kingdom for a
purchase price of approximately $2.1 million that resulted
in an aggregate increase in goodwill of $1.5 million,
calculated as the excess purchase price over the preliminary
fair value of the identifiable assets acquired.
29
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
11. | Acquisitions (continued) |
One of the core strategies of the Company is to capitalize on
its competitive strengths and enhance our leading marketing
positions. One of the key elements in that strategy is the
intention to grow our network through acquisitions. All of the
Companys acquisitions during fiscal year 2009 provide us
with increased market penetration or in some cases the
opportunity to enter new platforms and geographies. The purchase
price of each acquisition is primarily based on a multiple of
historical earnings. Our standard business model, and that of
the industrys, is one that does not rely heavily on
tangible assets and therefore, it is common to have a majority
of the purchase price allocated to goodwill, or in some cases,
intangibles.
The following reflects the change in goodwill during the periods
presented (in millions):
Balance at June 30, 2008
|
$ | 419.4 | ||
Acquisitions:
|
||||
Express Finance Limited
|
6.0 | |||
Robert Biggar Limited
|
4.3 | |||
Optima, S.A.
|
4.6 | |||
Various small acquisitions
|
1.5 | |||
Foreign currency adjustment
|
(29.3 | ) | ||
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
$ | 406.5 | ||
The following unaudited pro forma information for the years
ended June 30, 2008 and 2009 presents the results of
operations as if the acquisitions had occurred as of the
beginning of the periods presented. The pro forma operating
results include the results of these acquisitions for the
indicated periods and reflect the increased interest expense on
acquisition debt and the income tax impact as of the respective
purchase dates of the APL, the CCS, Express Finance, Robert
Biggar and Optima acquisitions. Pro forma results of operations
are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that
would have occurred had the purchase been made on the date above
or the results which may occur in the future.
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2008 | 2009 | |||||||
(Unaudited in |
||||||||
thousands except per |
||||||||
share amounts) | ||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 614,805 | $ | 543,711 | ||||
Net income/(loss)
|
$ | 50,597 | $ | (1,618 | ) | |||
Net income per common share basic
|
$ | 2.10 | $ | (0.07 | ) | |||
Net income per common share diluted
|
$ | 2.06 | $ | (0.07 | ) |
12. | We The People Restructuring Plan |
In December 2006, due to the inability to integrate the WTP
business with the Companys existing check cashing and
short term consumer lending store network along with the
litigation surrounding the WTP business, the Company approved
and implemented a restructuring plan for the WTP business, which
had previously been included in the Companys
U.S. reporting unit. The restructuring plan includes the
closing of all of the company-owned WTP locations and a focus on
improving the performance and profitability of the document
processing segment of the business by consolidating satellite
processing centers and eliminating low volume products and
related costs, while concentrating its sales effort, with
respect to new WTP franchises, in a select group of targeted
states.
30
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
12. | We The People Restructuring Plan (continued) |
As a result of the restructuring initiatives, in fiscal 2007,
the Company incurred $1.2 million for cash expenses related
to the closure of the company-operated stores and other
initiatives. In addition, the Company incurred
$23.2 million in one-time non-cash charges including the
write-off of $22.5 million of goodwill and
$0.7 million in other tangible and intangible assets, net
of deferred fees, which is included in goodwill impairment and
other charges on the statement of operations. There were no
charges related to the WTP restructuring plan during the fiscal
years 2008 and 2009. See Note 13 for further discussion.
13. | Goodwill and Other Intangibles |
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable
segment for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 and the
June 30, 2009 are as follows (in thousands):
United States | Canada | United Kingdom | Total | |||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2007
|
$ | 94,163 | $ | 134,081 | $ | 65,218 | $ | 293,462 | ||||||||
Acquisition
|
111,047 | 1,870 | 7,722 | 120,639 | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
| 5,892 | (642 | ) | 5,250 | |||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2008
|
$ | 205,210 | $ | 141,843 | $ | 72,298 | $ | 419,351 | ||||||||
Acquisition
|
5,125 | 51 | 11,287 | 16,463 | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
| (17,441 | ) | (11,819 | ) | (29,260 | ) | |||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
$ | 210,335 | $ | 124,453 | $ | 71,766 | $ | 406,554 | ||||||||
The following table reflects the components of intangible assets
(in thousands):
June 30, 2008 | June 30, 2009 | |||||||
Gross Carrying |
Gross Carrying |
|||||||
Amount | Amount | |||||||
Non-amortized
intangible assets:
|
||||||||
Goodwill
|
$ | 419,351 | $ | 406,554 | ||||
Reacquired franchise rights
|
51,380 | 47,793 | ||||||
$ | 470,731 | $ | 454,347 | |||||
The Company accounts for goodwill and other intangible assets in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS 142). Goodwill is the excess of cost
over the fair value of the net assets of the business acquired.
Intangible assets consist of reacquired franchise rights, which
are deemed to have an indefinite useful life and are not
amortized.
Goodwill is tested for impairment annually as of June 30,
or whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate
that an asset might be impaired. As of June 30, 2009, there
is no impairment of goodwill. However, if market conditions
continue to worsen or there is significant regulatory action
that negatively affects our business, there can be no assurance
that future goodwill impairment tests will not result in a
charge to earnings.
Identified intangibles with indefinite lives are tested for
impairment annually as of December 31, or whenever events
or changes in business circumstances indicate that an asset may
be impaired. If the estimated fair value is less than the
carrying amount of the intangible assets with indefinite lives,
then an impairment charge would be recognized to reduce the
asset to its estimated fair value. As of December 31, 2008,
there
31
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
13. | Goodwill and Other Intangibles (continued) |
was no impairment of reacquired franchise rights. There can be
no assurance that future impairment tests will not result in a
charge to earnings.
The fair value of the Companys goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets are estimated based upon a
present value technique using discounted future cash flows. The
Company uses management business plans and projections as the
basis for expected future cash flows. Assumptions in estimating
future cash flows are subject to a high degree of judgment. The
Company makes every effort to forecast its future cash flows as
accurately as possible at the time the forecast is developed.
However, changes in assumptions and estimates may affect the
implied fair value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible
assets and could result in an additional impairment charge in
future periods.
14. | Contingent Liabilities |
Due to the uncertainty surrounding the litigation process,
except for those matters where an accrual has been provided for,
the Company is unable to reasonably estimate the range of loss,
if any, at this time in connection with the legal proceedings
discussed below. While the outcome of many of these matters is
currently not determinable, the Company believes it has
meritorious defenses and that the ultimate cost to resolve these
matters will not have a material adverse effect on the
Companys consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows. In addition to the legal proceedings
discussed below, the Company is involved in routine litigation
and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business.
We assess the materiality of litigation by reviewing a range of
qualitative and quantitative factors. These factors include the
size of the potential claims, the merits of the Companys
defenses and the likelihood of plaintiffs success on the
merits, the regulatory environment that could impact such claims
and the potential impact of the litigation on our business. The
Company evaluates the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome of
the legal or regulatory proceedings to which it is a party in
accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies. This assessment is subjective based on the
status of the legal proceedings and is based on consultation
with in-house and external legal counsel. The actual outcomes of
these proceedings may differ from the Companys assessments.
Canadian
Legal Proceedings
On August 19, 2003, a former customer in Ontario, Canada,
Margaret Smith commenced an action against OPCO and the
Companys Canadian subsidiary, Money Mart, on behalf of a
purported class of Ontario borrowers who, Smith claims, were
subjected to usurious charges in payday-loan transactions. The
action, which is pending in the Ontario Superior Court of
Justice, alleges violations of a Canadian federal law
proscribing usury, seeks restitution and damages, including
punitive damages, and seeks injunctive relief prohibiting
further alleged usurious charges. The plaintiffs motion
for class certification was granted on January 5, 2007. The
trial of the common issues commenced on April 27, 2009 but
was suspended when the parties reached a settlement. During the
fiscal quarter and fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, our
Canadian subsidiary, Money Mart, recorded a charge of
US$57.4 million in relation to the pending Ontario
settlement and for the potential settlement of certain of the
similar class action proceedings pending in other Canadian
provinces described below. There is no assurance that the
Ontario settlement of a class action proceeding in the provinces
of Canada will receive final Court approval or that any of the
other class action proceedings will be settled. Although we
believe that we have meritorious defenses to the claims in the
proceedings and intend to vigorously defend against such claims,
the ultimate cost of resolution of such claims, either through
settlements or pursuant to litigation, may substantially exceed
the amount accrued at June 30, 2009, and additional
accruals may be required in the future. Of the amount recorded,
$6.5 million was paid during the
32
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
14. | Contingent Liabilities (continued) |
Canadian
Legal Proceedings (continued)
fourth quarter, and the remaining provision of approximately
$50.9 million is included in the Companys accrued
expenses.
On November 6, 2003, Gareth Young, a former customer,
commenced a purported class action in the Court of Queens
Bench of Alberta, Canada on behalf of a class of consumers who
obtained short-term loans from Money Mart in Alberta, alleging,
among other things, that the charge to borrowers in connection
with such loans is usurious. The action seeks restitution and
damages, including punitive damages. On December 9, 2005,
Money Mart settled this action, subject to court approval. On
March 3, 2006, just prior to the date scheduled for final
court approval of the settlement, the plaintiffs lawyers
advised that they would not proceed with the settlement and
indicated their intention to join a purported national class
action. No steps have been taken in the action since March 2006.
Subsequently, Money Mart commenced an action against the
plaintiff and the plaintiffs lawyer for breach of
contract. This latter action has since been resolved.
On March 5, 2007, a former customer, H. Craig Day,
commenced an action against OPCO, Money Mart and several of the
Companys franchisees in the Court of Queens Bench of
Alberta, Canada on behalf of a putative class of consumers who
obtained short-term loans from Money Mart in Alberta. The
allegations, putative class and relief sought in the Day
action are substantially the same as those in the Young
action but relate to a claim period that commences before
and ends after the claim period in the Young action and
excludes the claim period described in that action.
On January 29, 2003, a former customer, Kurt MacKinnon,
commenced an action against Money Mart and 26 other Canadian
lenders on behalf of a purported class of British Columbia
residents who, MacKinnon claims were overcharged in payday-loan
transactions. The action, which is pending in the Supreme Court
of British Columbia, alleges violations of laws proscribing
usury and unconscionable trade practices and seeks restitution
and damages, including punitive damages, in an unknown amount.
Following initial denial, MacKinnon obtained an order permitting
him to re-apply for class certification of the action against
Money Mart alone, which was appealed. The Court of Appeal
granted MacKinnon the right to apply to the original judge to
have her amend her order denying class certification. On
June 14, 2006, the original judge granted the requested
order and Money Marts request for leave to appeal the
order was dismissed. The certification motion in this action
proceeded in conjunction with the certification motion in the
Parsons action described below.
On April 15, 2005, the solicitor acting for MacKinnon
commenced a proposed class action against Money Mart on behalf
of another former customer, Louise Parsons. Class certification
of the consolidated MacKinnon and Parsons actions was granted on
March 14, 2007. In December 2007 the plaintiffs filed a
motion to add OPCO as a defendant in this action and in March
2008 an order was granted adding OPCO as a defendant. On
July 25, 2008, the plaintiffs motion to certify the
action against OPCO was granted. The action against Money Mart
and OPCO is presently in the discovery phase and a summary trial
is scheduled to commence in March 2010.
Similar purported class actions have been commenced against
Money Mart in Manitoba, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and
Newfoundland. OPCO is named as a defendant in the actions
commenced in Nova Scotia and Newfoundland. The claims in these
additional actions are substantially similar to those of the
Ontario action referred to above.
On April 26, and August 3, 2006, two former employees,
Peggy White and Kelly Arseneau, commenced companion actions
against Money Mart and OPCO. The actions, which are pending in
the Superior Court of Ontario, allege negligence on the part of
the defendants in security training procedures and breach of
fiduciary duty to employees in violation of applicable statutes.
The companion lawsuits seek combined damages of
33
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
14. | Contingent Liabilities (continued) |
Canadian
Legal Proceedings (continued)
C$5.0 million plus interest and costs. These claims have
been submitted to the respective insurance carriers. The Company
intends to defend these actions vigorously.
At this time, it is too early to determine the likelihood of an
unfavorable outcome or the ultimate liability, if any, resulting
from these matters.
California
Legal Proceedings
On September 11, 2006, Caren Bufil commenced a lawsuit
against OPCO; the claims in Bufil are substantially
similar to the claims in a previously dismissed case. Bufil
seeks class certification of the action alleging that OPCO
failed to provide non-management employees with meal and rest
breaks required under California law. The suit seeks an
unspecified amount of damages and other relief. OPCO filed a
motion for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that the Bufil
case is duplicative of the previous case and should be
dismissed. Plaintiff filed her motion for class certification.
OPCOs motion was granted and Bufils motion was
denied. Bufil appealed both rulings. In April 2008, the Court of
Appeal reversed the trial courts ruling. OPCO filed a
petition for review of that decision with the California Supreme
Court, but in July 2008 the Court denied the petition. The case
was then returned to the trial court level and was assigned to
the complex division. The trial court ordered briefing and a
hearing on the issue of what discretion the trial court had on
plaintiffs motion for class certification. After the
hearing, the trial court ruled that it had to follow the Court
of Appeals decision on class certification issues and
ordered that the plaintiffs proposed class and
sub-classes
be certified. At this time, it is too early to determine the
likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or the ultimate liability,
if any, resulting from the Bufil case.
On April 26, 2007, the San Francisco City Attorney
(City Attorney) filed a complaint in the name of the
People of the State of California alleging that OPCOs
subsidiaries engaged in unlawful and deceptive business
practices in violation of California Business and Professions
Code Section 17200 by either themselves making installment
loans under the guise of marketing and servicing for
co-defendant First Bank of Delaware (the Bank) or by
brokering installment loans made by the Bank in California in
violation of the prohibition on usury contained in the
California Constitution and the California Finance Lenders Law
and that they have otherwise violated the California Finance
Lenders Law and the California Deferred Deposit Transaction Law.
The complaint seeks broad injunctive relief as well as civil
penalties. On January 5, 2009, the City Attorney filed a
First Amended Complaint, restating the claims in the original
complaint, adding OPCO as a defendant and adding a claim that
short-term deferred deposit loans made by the Bank, which were
marketed and serviced by OPCO
and/or its
subsidiaries violated the California Deferred Deposit
Transaction law. OPCO and its subsidiaries have denied the
allegations of the First Amended Complaint. Discovery is
proceeding in state court and no trial date has been set. At
this time, it is too early to determine the likelihood of an
unfavorable outcome or the ultimate liability, if any, resulting
from this case.
We The
People Legal Proceedings
The Companys business model for its legal document
processing services business is being challenged in certain
courts, as described below, which could result in the
Companys discontinuation of these services in any one or
more jurisdictions. The company from which the Company bought
the assets of its WTP business, We The People Forms and Service
Centers USA, Inc. (the Former WTP), certain of its
franchisees
and/or WTP
are defendants in various lawsuits. The principal litigation for
the WTP business unit is as follows:
In May 2007, WTP met with the New York State Attorney
Generals Office, Consumer Affairs Division, which had been
investigating WTP operation in the New York City area for over
three years. The Attorney
34
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
14. | Contingent Liabilities (continued) |
We The
People Legal Proceedings (continued)
Generals Office alleged that WTP engaged in unfair
business practices, including deceptive advertising that harmed
New York consumers. The Attorney Generals Office demanded
that WTP enter into an Agreed Order of Discontinuance
(AOD) and demanded WTP pay a fine of approximately
$0.3 million, plus investigation costs. WTP denied the
allegations and requested that the Attorney Generals
Office hold the former New York City WTP owners liable for the
alleged misconduct. The terms of the AOD are in negotiation.
In May 2007, WTP franchisee Roseann Pennisi and her company, We
The People of Westchester Square, New York, Inc., sued the
Company, Ira and Linda Distenfield, IDLD, and WTP in the Supreme
Court of the State of New York, Bronx County. The complaint
alleges breach of franchise agreement, tortious interference
with franchise agreement, breach of the covenant of good faith
and fair dealing, unfair competition against defendants and
breach of contract and deception and misrepresentation, unjust
enrichment, fraudulent concealment of material facts against the
Distenfields and IDLD, Inc. and seeks over $9.0 million in
damages. Following a successful motion by WTP to compel
arbitration of the plaintiffs claims, in October 2008, the
plaintiff filed a request to arbitrate with relief requested in
the amount of $0.4 million. In August 2009, plaintiff
amended her petition to arbitrate and increased it to $650,000.
The Company believes the material allegations in the complaint
with respect to the Company and WTP are without merit and
intends to defend the matter vigorously.
In September 2007, Jacqueline Fitzgibbons, who claims to be a
former customer of a WTP store, commenced a lawsuit against the
Company and others in California Superior Court for Alameda
County. The suit alleges on behalf of a putative class of
consumers and senior citizens that, from 2003 to 2007, We The
People violated California law by advertising and selling living
trusts and wills to certain California residents. Fitzgibbons
claims, among other things, that the Company and others
improperly conspired to provide her with legal advice, misled
her as to what, if any, legitimate service We The People
provided in preparing documents, and misled her regarding the
supervising attorneys role in preparing documents. The
plaintiff is seeking class certification, prohibition of the
Companys alleged unlawful business practices, and damages
on behalf of the class in the form of disgorgement of all monies
and profits obtained from unlawful business practices, general
and special damages, attorneys fees and costs of the suit,
statutory and tremble damages pursuant to various California
business, elder abuse, and consumer protection codes. The
complaint has been amended several times to add new parties and
additional claims. The Court granted, in part, the
Companys motion to dismiss certain claims alleged by the
plaintiffs. In January 2009, an individual named Robert Blau
replaced Fitzgibbons as lead plaintiff. The plaintiffs have
moved for class certification and the motion is scheduled to be
heard October 19, 2009. The Company is defending these
allegations vigorously and believes that the claims and the
assertion of class status are without merit.
In August 2008, a group of six former We The People customers
commenced a lawsuit in St. Louis County, Missouri against
the Company, its subsidiary, We The People USA, Inc. and WTP
franchisees offering services to Missouri consumers. The
plaintiffs allege, on behalf of a putative class of over 1,000
consumers that, from 2002 to the present, defendants violated
Missouri law by engaging in: (i) an unauthorized law
business, (ii) the unauthorized practice of law, and
(iii) unlawful merchandising practices in the sale of its
legal documents. The plaintiffs are seeking class certification,
prohibition of the defendants unlawful business practices,
and damages on behalf of the class in the form of disgorgement
of all monies and profits obtained from unlawful business
practices, attorneys fees, statutory and treble damages
pursuant to various Missouri consumer protection codes. In
November 2008, the original six plaintiffs were dismissed by
plaintiffs counsel and the initial complaint was also
later dismissed. In January 2009, former WTP customers, Philip
Jones and Carol Martin, on behalf of a punitive class of
Missouri customers, filed a lawsuit in St. Louis County
against the Company and its subsidiary, We The People USA, Inc.,
and a St. Louis franchisee entity alleging claims similar
to the initial August 2008
35
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
14. | Contingent Liabilities (continued) |
We The
People Legal Proceedings (continued)
suit. These new plaintiffs also seek class certification. The
Company intends to defend these allegations and believes that
the plaintiffs claims and allegations of class status are
without merit.
On January 14, 2009, a demand for arbitration was made on
behalf of Thomas Greene and Rebecca M. Greene, We The People
franchisees, against We The People USA, Inc., We The People LLC
and the Company. The demand alleged violations by We The People
of certain state and federal franchise laws relating to
(1) failure to register the franchise as a business
opportunity with the Utah Division of Consumer Protection;
(2) earnings claims representations and (3) failure to
provide a disclosure document meeting the substantive and timing
requirements mandated by the Utah Business Opportunity Act. The
Greenes are demanding $425,000 for losses relating to the
violations. WTP and the Company believe the allegations are
without merit and intend to defend the matter vigorously.
In June 2009, a demand for arbitration was filed by a current We
The People franchisee, Frank Murphy, Jr., against the
Companys subsidiaries, We The People USA, Inc., and We The
People LLC. The demand alleges violations by We The People of
certain obligations under the Franchise Agreement and seeks
$1 million for losses relating to these violations. WTP
believes the allegations are without merit and intends to defend
the matter vigorously.
In January 2009, the Company learned that Ira and Linda
Distenfield had filed a joint voluntary petition under
Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In addition to
delaying the ultimate resolution of many of the foregoing
matters, the economic effect of this filing and, in particular,
its effect on the Companys ability to seek contribution
from its co-defendants in connection with any of the foregoing
matters, cannot presently be estimated.
It is the Companys opinion that many of the WTP related
litigation matters relate to actions undertaken by the
Distenfields, IDLD, Inc. and the Former WTP during the period of
time when they owned or managed We The People Forms and Service
Centers USA, Inc.; this period of time was prior to the
acquisition of the assets of the Former WTP by the Company.
However, in many of these actions, the Company and WTP have been
included as defendants in these cases as well. At this time, it
is too early to determine the likelihood of an unfavorable
outcome or the ultimate liability, if any, of any of the
aforementioned matters against WTP or the Company or any other
Company litigation as well.
In addition to the matters described above, the Company
continues to respond to inquiries it receives from state bar
associations and state regulatory authorities from time to time
as a routine part of its business regarding its legal document
processing services business and its WTP franchisees.
15. | Credit Risk |
At June 30, 2008 and 2009, OPCO had 22 and 37,
respectively, bank accounts in major U.S. financial
institutions in the aggregate amount of $11.9 million and
$4.6 million, respectively, which exceeded Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation deposit protection limits. The Canadian
Federal Banking system provides customers with similar deposit
insurance through the Canadian Deposit Insurance Corporation
(CDIC). At June 30, 2008 and 2009, the
Companys Canadian subsidiary had 32 and 42 bank accounts,
respectively, totaling $116.8 million and
$100.1 million, respectively, which exceeded CDIC limits.
At June 30, 2008 and 2009 the Companys United Kingdom
operations had 47 and 49 bank accounts, respectively, totaling
$5.2 million and $13.6 million, respectively. These
financial institutions have strong credit ratings and management
believes credit risk relating to these deposits is minimal.
36
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
15. | Credit Risk (continued) |
In December 2006, the Company entered into cross-currency
interest rate swap transactions to hedge against the change in
value of the Companys U.K. Term Facility and Canadian Term
Facility denominated in a currency other than OPCOs
foreign subsidiaries respective functional currency. Under
these cross-currency interest rate swap agreements with the
Companys two swap counter-parties, the Company hedged
$375 million of its debt. These financial institutions have
strong credit ratings and management believes the credit risk
related to these swaps is minimal. On May 7, 2009, the
Company terminated its two cross-currency interest rate swaps
hedging variable-rate borrowings at its foreign subsidiary in
the United Kingdom. As a result, the Company discontinued
prospectively hedge accounting on these cross-currency swaps. In
accordance with the provisions of SFAS 133, the Company
will continue to report the net gain or loss related to the
discontinued cash flow hedge in other comprehensive income
included in shareholders equity and will subsequently
reclassify such amounts into earnings over the remaining
original term of the derivative when the hedged forecasted
transactions are recognized in earnings. The aggregate
unamortized notional amount of the swaps was $409.3 million
and $339.9 at June 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
The Company had approximately $114.7 million of net
consumer loans on its balance sheet at June 30, 2009 and
approximately $115.8 million at June 30, 2008. These
amounts are reflected in loans receivable, net. Loans
receivable, net at June 30, 2009 and 2008 are reported net
of a reserve of $12.1 million and $7.9 million,
respectively, related to consumer lending. Loans in default at
June 30, 2009 were $6.4 million, net of a
$17.0 million allowance, and were $11.3 million, net
of a $22.6 million allowance at June 30, 2008.
Activity in the allowance for loan losses during the fiscal
years ended 2007, 2008 and 2009 was as follows (in thousands):
Allowances
for Loan Losses
Balance at |
Provision for |
Foreign |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of |
Company-Funded |
Currency |
Net Charge- |
Balance at |
||||||||||||||||||||
Description
|
Period | Loan Losses | Translation | Acquisitions | Offs | End of Period | ||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan loss allowance
|
$ | 7,853 | $ | 5,526 | $ | (1,307 | ) | $ | 5,605 | $ | (5,545 | ) | $ | 12,132 | ||||||||||
Defaulted loan allowance
|
22,580 | 45,529 | (1,691 | ) | | (49,418 | ) | 17,000 | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan loss allowance
|
8,623 | 6,498 | (129 | ) | | (7,139 | ) | 7,853 | ||||||||||||||||
Defaulted loan allowance
|
18,045 | 50,784 | 368 | | (46,617 | ) | 22,580 | |||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan loss allowance
|
5,365 | 6,126 | 464 | | (3,332 | ) | 8,623 | |||||||||||||||||
Defaulted loan allowance
|
$ | 11,694 | $ | 32,884 | $ | 638 | $ | | $ | (27,171 | ) | $ | 18,045 |
16. Capital
Stock
On July 21, 2008, the Company announced that its Board of
Directors had approved a stock repurchase plan, authorizing the
Company to repurchase in the aggregate up to $7.5 million
of its outstanding common stock, which is the maximum amount of
common stock the Company can repurchase pursuant to the terms of
its credit facility.
Under the plan authorized by its Board of Directors, the Company
was permitted to repurchase shares in open market purchases or
through privately negotiated transactions as permitted under
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Rule 10b-18.
The extent to which the Company repurchased its shares and the
timing of such repurchases depended upon market conditions and
other corporate considerations, as determined by the
Companys management. The purchases were funded from
existing cash balances.
37
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
16. | Capital Stock (continued) |
By October 13, 2008, the Company had repurchased
535,799 shares of its common stock at a cost of
approximately $7.5 million, thus completing its stock
repurchase plan.
17. | Fair Value Measurements |
SFAS 157 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques
based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are
observable or unobservable. In general, fair values determined
by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the
Company has the ability to access. Level 2 inputs include
quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active
markets and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable
for the asset or liability. Level 3 inputs are unobservable
inputs for the asset or liability and include situations where
there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or
liability. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair
value may fall into different levels of the fair value
hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy
is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the
fair value measurement in its entirety. The Companys
assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair
value in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors
specific to the asset or liability.
Currently, the Company uses foreign currency options and cross
currency interest rate swaps to manage its interest rate and
foreign currency risk. The valuation of these instruments is
determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including
discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each
derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the
derivatives, including the period to maturity and uses
observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves,
foreign exchange rates and implied volatilities. To comply with
the provisions of SFAS No. 157, the Company
incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately
reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective
counterpartys nonperformance risk in the fair value
measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative
contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has
considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit
enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual
puts, and guarantees. Although the Company has determined that
the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall
within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit
valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize
Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads
to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its
counterparties. However, as of June 30, 2009, the Company
has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit
valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative
positions and has determined that the credit valuation
adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its
derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined that its
derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in
Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The table below presents the Companys assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
June 30, 2009, aggregated by the level in the fair value
hierarchy within which those measurements fall.
Assets
and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis at
June 30, 2009
( in thousands)
( in thousands)
Quoted Prices in |
||||||||||||||||
Active Markets |
Significant |
|||||||||||||||
for Identical |
Other |
Significant |
Balance at |
|||||||||||||
Assets and |
Observable |
Unobservable |
June 30, |
|||||||||||||
Liabilities (Level 1) | Inputs (Level 2) | Inputs (Level 3) | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments
|
$ | | $ | 564 | $ | | $ | 564 | ||||||||
Liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments
|
$ | | $ | 10,223 | $ | | $ | 10,223 |
38
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
17. | Fair Value Measurements (continued) |
The Company does not have any fair value measurements using
significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as of
June 30, 2009.
18. | Loss on Store Closing and Other Restructuring |
On June 30, 2008 the Company, as part of a process to
rationalize its United States markets, made a determination to
close 24 of its unprofitable stores in various United States
markets. For all but one of these stores, the cease-use date was
July 11, 2008 while one other store had a cease-use date of
July 25, 2008. Customers from these stores have been
transitioned to other Company stores in close proximity to the
stores affected.
In August 2008, the Company identified an additional 29 stores
in the United States and 17 stores in Canada that were
underperforming or overlapping and which were closed or merged
into a geographically proximate store. The cease-use date for 44
of these stores was in September 2008 with the cease-use date of
the final two U.S. stores completed in the month of
October. Customers from these stores were transitioned to other
Company stores in close proximity to the stores affected.
The Company recorded costs for severance and other retention
benefits of $0.6 million and store closure costs of
$5.8 million consisting primarily of lease obligations and
leasehold improvement write-offs related to the June 2008 and
August 2008 store closings. These charges were expensed within
loss on store closings on the statements of operations. Of the
$6.4 million charge, $3.3 million related to the
United States segment and $3.1 million for the Canadian
segment.
During the fourth quarter of the year ended June 30, 2009,
the Company announced the closure of an additional 60
U.S. under-performing stores located in states with
uncertain or less favorable regulation, or are located in states
where the Company only has a few locations resulting in an
inefficient and more costly infrastructure. For all of these
locations, the cease-use date was prior to June 30, 2009.
The Company recorded costs for severance and other retention
benefits of $0.4 million and store closure costs of
$2.9 million consisting primarily of lease obligations and
leasehold improvement write-offs related to this program. Most
of these locations were either at or near their lease-end term.
The remaining liability accrued for all of the store closures
during fiscal 2009 is approximately $1.2 million as of
June 30, 2009.
19. | Segment Information |
The Company categorizes its operations into three operating
segments that have been identified giving consideration to
geographic area, product mix and regulatory environment. The
primary service offerings in all operating segments are check
cashing, single-payment consumer loans, money orders, money
transfers and other ancillary services. As a result of the mix
of service offerings and diversity in the respective regulatory
environments, there are differences in each operating
segments profit margins. Additionally, the United States
operating segment includes all corporate headquarters expenses
that have not been charged out to the operating segments in the
United States, Canada and United Kingdom. This factor also
contributes to the lower pre-tax results reported in this
segment. Those unallocated corporate headquarters expenses are
$3.8 million for fiscal year 2007, $2.7 million for
fiscal year 2008 and $6.6 million for fiscal year 2009.
39
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
19. | Segment Information (continued) |
All amounts
in thousands
United |
United |
|||||||||||||||
States | Canada | Kingdom | Total | |||||||||||||
2007
|
||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 268,690 | $ | 405,581 | $ | 157,504 | $ | 831,775 | ||||||||
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
|
94,459 | 179,665 | 67,557 | 341,681 | ||||||||||||
Sales to unaffiliated customers:
|
||||||||||||||||
Check cashing
|
48,435 | 66,646 | 51,673 | 166,754 | ||||||||||||
Fees from consumer lending
|
73,611 | 110,010 | 43,824 | 227,445 | ||||||||||||
Money transfers
|
4,325 | 11,678 | 4,876 | 20,879 | ||||||||||||
Franchise fees and royalties
|
3,877 | 3,081 | | 6,958 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
5,757 | 21,121 | 6,818 | 33,696 | ||||||||||||
Total sales to unaffiliated customers
|
136,005 | 212,536 | 107,191 | 455,732 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
22,299 | 13,692 | 9,808 | 45,799 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net
|
13,723 | 11,634 | 6,105 | 31,462 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
4,295 | 4,545 | 4,005 | 12,845 | ||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
31,784 | | | 31,784 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment and other charges
|
24,301 | | | 24,301 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized foreign exchange loss (gain)
|
| 8,362 | (811 | ) | 7,551 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from litigation settlements
|
(3,256 | ) | | | (3,256 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss on store closings
|
772 | 46 | 146 | 964 | ||||||||||||
Other expense (income), net
|
301 | (323 | ) | 458 | 436 | |||||||||||
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
(70,032 | ) | 57,757 | 17,807 | 5,532 | |||||||||||
Income tax provision
|
7,062 | 25,303 | 5,370 | 37,735 |
40
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
19. | Segment Information (continued) |
United |
United |
|||||||||||||||
States | Canada | Kingdom | Total | |||||||||||||
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 281,139 | $ | 473,469 | $ | 186,804 | $ | 941,412 | ||||||||
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
|
205,506 | 189,429 | 75,796 | 470,731 | ||||||||||||
Sales to unaffiliated customers:
|
||||||||||||||||
Check cashing
|
57,438 | 81,806 | 57,336 | 196,580 | ||||||||||||
Fees from consumer lending
|
79,838 | 147,313 | 65,366 | 292,517 | ||||||||||||
Money transfers
|
5,744 | 16,124 | 5,644 | 27,512 | ||||||||||||
Franchise fees and royalties
|
2,589 | 2,409 | | 4,998 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
8,122 | 31,839 | 10,616 | 50,577 | ||||||||||||
Total sales to unaffiliated customers
|
153,731 | 279,491 | 138,962 | 572,184 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan loss
|
24,889 | 27,115 | 6,454 | 58,458 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net
|
15,168 | 21,611 | 7,599 | 44,378 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
5,443 | 7,017 | 5,105 | 17,565 | ||||||||||||
Provision for litigation settlements
|
345 | | | 345 | ||||||||||||
Loss on store closings
|
869 | 119 | 5 | 993 | ||||||||||||
Other expense (income), net
|
106 | (627 | ) | (105 | ) | (626 | ) | |||||||||
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
(11,987 | ) | 68,706 | 22,660 | 79,379 | |||||||||||
Income tax provision
|
3,491 | 25,721 | 6,803 | 36,015 |
United |
United |
|||||||||||||||
States | Canada | Kingdom | Total | |||||||||||||
2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 288,131 | $ | 446,198 | $ | 187,136 | $ | 921,465 | ||||||||
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
|
210,631 | 166,149 | 77,567 | 454,347 | ||||||||||||
Sales to unaffiliated customers:
|
||||||||||||||||
Check cashing
|
56,378 | 67,830 | 40,390 | 164,598 | ||||||||||||
Fees from consumer lending
|
79,612 | 121,518 | 74,142 | 275,272 | ||||||||||||
Money transfers
|
5,926 | 15,092 | 5,805 | 26,823 | ||||||||||||
Franchise fees and royalties
|
1,872 | 2,339 | | 4,211 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
11,070 | 29,488 | 16,391 | 56,949 | ||||||||||||
Total sales to unaffiliated customers
|
154,858 | 236,267 | 136,728 | 527,853 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan loss
|
20,821 | 23,201 | 8,114 | 52,136 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net
|
20,594 | 16,499 | 6,603 | 43,696 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
5,553 | 5,980 | 5,369 | 16,902 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized foreign exchange gain
|
| | (5,499 | ) | (5,499 | ) | ||||||||||
Provision for litigation settlements
|
444 | 57,476 | | 57,920 | ||||||||||||
Loss on store closings
|
7,170 | 2,967 | 203 | 10,340 | ||||||||||||
Other expense (income), net
|
353 | (3,361 | ) | (1,890 | ) | (4,898 | ) | |||||||||
(Loss) income before income taxes(1)
|
(28,983 | ) | 769 | 36,415 | 8,201 | |||||||||||
Income tax provision
|
5,106 | (44 | ) | 9,961 | 15,023 |
(1) | (Loss) income before income taxes for the United States and Canada have been adjusted by $4,980. This adjustment is related to the disallowed portion that was repaid by the United States to its Canadian subsidiary associated with the settlement granted in the competent authority tax proceeding. |
41
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
20. | Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities |
Risk
Management Objective of Using Derivatives
The Company is exposed to certain risk arising from both its
business operations and economic conditions. The Company
principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business
and operational risks through management of its core business
activities. The Company manages economic risks, including
interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing
the amount, sources, and duration of its debt funding and by the
use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, certain
of the Companys foreign operations in the United Kingdom
and Canada expose the Company to fluctuations in interest rates
and foreign exchange rates. These fluctuations may impact the
value of the Companys cash receipts and payments in terms
of the Companys functional currency. The Company enters
into derivative financial instruments to protect the value or
fix the amount of certain obligations in terms of its functional
currency, the U.S. Dollar.
Cash Flow
Hedges of Foreign Exchange Risk
Operations in the United Kingdom and Canada have exposed the
Company to changes in the CAD-USD and GBP-USD foreign exchange
rates. From time to time, the Companys U.K and Canadian
subsidiaries purchase investment securities denominated in a
currency other than their functional currency. The subsidiaries
hedge the related foreign exchange risk typically with the use
of out of the money put options because they cost less than
completely averting risk using at the money put options, and the
maximum loss is limited to the purchase price of the contracts.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of
derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges of
foreign exchange risk is recorded in other comprehensive income
and subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that
the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The
ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the
derivative, as well as amounts excluded from the assessment of
hedge effectiveness, is recognized directly in earnings. As of
June 30, 2009, the Company had the following outstanding
foreign currency derivatives that were used to hedge its foreign
exchange risks for the month of July:
Notional |
Notional |
|||||||
Foreign Currency Derivates
|
Sold | Purchased | ||||||
CAD Put/USD Call Options
|
C$ | 12,000,000 | $ | 10,810,811 | ||||
GBP Put/USD Call Options
|
GBP 3,600,000 | $ | 5,760,000 |
During August 2009 the Company purchased additional foreign
currency derivatives to hedge its foreign exchange risks for the
months of October, November and December 2009.
Cash Flow
Hedges of Multiple Risks
The Company has foreign subsidiaries in the United Kingdom and
Canada with variable-rate borrowings denominated in currencies
other than the foreign subsidiaries functional currencies.
The foreign subsidiaries are exposed to fluctuations in both the
underlying variable borrowing rate and the foreign currency of
the borrowing against its functional currency. The foreign
subsidiaries use foreign currency derivatives including
cross-currency interest rate swaps to manage its exposure to
fluctuations in the variable borrowing rate and the foreign
exchange rate. Cross-currency interest rate swaps involve both
periodically (1) exchanging fixed rate interest payments
for floating rate interest receipts and (2) exchanging
notional amounts which will occur at the forward exchange rates
in effect upon entering into the instrument. The derivatives are
designated as cash flow hedges of both interest rate and foreign
exchange risks.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of
derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges of
both interest rate risk and foreign exchange risk is recorded in
other comprehensive income and is subsequently reclassified into
earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction
affects earnings.
42
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
20. | Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (continued) |
Cash Flow
Hedges of Multiple Risks (continued)
The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the
derivative is recognized directly in earnings. The Company
reclassifies from other comprehensive income to corporate
expenses an amount that will offset the related re-measurement
gains and losses on the foreign-currency denominated
variable-rate borrowings also recorded in corporate expenses.
On May 7, 2009, the Company executed an early settlement of
its two cross-currency interest rate swaps hedging variable-rate
borrowings at its foreign subsidiary in the United Kingdom. As a
result, the Company discontinued prospectively hedge accounting
on these cross-currency swaps. In accordance with the provisions
of SFAS 133, the Company will continue to report the net
gain or loss related to the discontinued cash flow hedge in
other comprehensive income included in shareholders equity
and will subsequently reclassify such amounts into earnings over
the remaining original term of the derivative when the hedged
forecasted transactions are recognized in earnings.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had the following
outstanding derivatives that were used to hedge both interest
rate risk and foreign exchange risk:
Pay Fixed |
Pay Fixed Strike |
Receive Floating |
Receive Floating |
|||||||||||
Foreign Currency Derivates
|
Notional | Rate | Notional | Index | ||||||||||
USD-CAD Cross Currency Swap
|
CAD184,503,955 | 7.135 | % | $ | 160,462,500 |
3 mo. LIBOR + 2.75% per annum |
||||||||
USD-CAD Cross Currency Swap
|
CAD61,773,249 | 7.130 | % | $ | 53,487,500 |
3 mo. LIBOR + 2.75% per annum |
||||||||
USD-CAD Cross Currency Swap
|
CAD84,271,988 | 7.070 | % | $ | 72,937,500 |
3 mo. LIBOR + 2.75% per annum |
Tabular
Disclosures
The table below presents the fair values of the Companys
derivative financial instruments on the Consolidated Balance
Sheet as of June 30, 2009 (in thousands).
Tabular Disclosure of Fair Values of Derivative Instruments(1) | ||||||||||||
Asset Derivatives |
Liability Derivatives |
|||||||||||
As of June 30, 2009 | As of June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||
Balance Sheet |
Fair |
Balance Sheet |
Fair |
|||||||||
Location | Value | Location | Value | |||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133
|
||||||||||||
Foreign Exchange Contracts
|
Prepaid Expenses | $ | 564 | Other Liabilities | $ | | ||||||
Cross Currency Swaps
|
Derivatives | Derivatives | 10,223 | |||||||||
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under
SFAS 133
|
$ | 564 | $ | 10,223 | ||||||||
(1) | The fair values of derivative instruments are presented in the above table on a gross basis. Certain of the above derivative instruments are subject to master netting arrangements and qualify for net presentation in the Consolidated Balance Sheet in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts. |
The tables below present the effect of the Companys
derivative financial instruments on the Consolidated Statement
of Operations for the year ending June 30, 2009 (in
thousands).
43
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
20. | Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (continued) |
Tabular
Disclosures (continued)
Tabular Disclosure of the Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Year Ending June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Location of |
||||||||||||||||
Gain or (Loss) |
Amount of Gain or |
|||||||||||||||
Recognized |
(Loss) Recognized |
|||||||||||||||
Amount of Gain or |
in Income on |
in Income on |
||||||||||||||
(Loss) Recognized |
Location of |
Derivative |
Derivative |
|||||||||||||
in OCI on |
Gain or (Loss) |
Amount of Gain or |
(Ineffective |
(Ineffective |
||||||||||||
Derivative |
Reclassified |
(Loss) Reclassified |
Portion and Amount |
Portion and Amount |
||||||||||||
Derivatives in SFAS 133 |
(Effective |
from Accumulated |
from Accumulated |
Excluded from |
Excluded from |
|||||||||||
Cash Flow Hedging |
Portion), net of |
OCI into Income |
OCI into Income |
Effectiveness |
Effectiveness |
|||||||||||
Relationships
|
tax | (Effective Portion) | (Effective Portion) | Testing) | Testing) | |||||||||||
Foreign Exchange Contracts
|
$ | 214 |
Foreign currency gain/(loss) |
$ | | Other income/ (expense) | $ | | ||||||||
Cross Currency Swaps
|
Interest Expense | (132 | ) | Other income/ (expense) | 45 | |||||||||||
20,660 |
Corporate Expenses |
37 | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 20,874 | $ | (95 | ) | $ | 45 | |||||||||
Credit-risk-related
Contingent Features
The Company has agreements with each of its derivative
counterparties that contain a provision where if the Company
defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where
repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the
lender, then the Company could also be declared in default on
its derivative obligations
The Companys agreements with its derivative counterparties
also contain provisions requiring it to maintain certain minimum
financial covenant ratios related to its indebtedness. Failure
to comply with the covenant provisions would result in the
Company being in default on any derivative instrument
obligations covered by the agreement.
As of June 30, 2009, the fair value of derivatives in a net
liability position, which includes accrued interest but excludes
any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these
agreements was $21.3 million. As of June 30, 2009, the
Company has not posted any collateral related to these
agreements. If the Company breached any of these provisions it
would be required to settle its obligations under the agreements
at their termination value of $21.3 million.
21. | Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Comprehensive income (loss) is the change in equity from
transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner
sources, which includes foreign currency translation and fair
value adjustments for cash flow hedges. The following shows the
comprehensive income (loss) for the periods stated (in
thousands):
June 30, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | (32,203 | ) | $ | 43,364 | $ | (6,822 | ) | ||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment(1)
|
2,940 | 302 | (17,884 | ) | ||||||||
Fair value adjustments for cash flow hedges, net(2),(3)
|
4,426 | (7,870 | ) | (8,152 | ) | |||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
$ | (24,837 | ) | $ | 35,796 | $ | (32,858 | ) | ||||
44
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
21. | Comprehensive Income (Loss) (continued) |
(1) | The ending balance of the foreign currency translation adjustments included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the balance sheet were gains of $37.6 million, $37.9 million and $20.2 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009. | |
(2) | Net of $2.2 million, $3.8 million and $7.7 million of tax for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. | |
(3) | Net of $0.8 million, $1.2 million and $2.0 million which were reclassified into earnings for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. |
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of related tax,
consisted of net unrealized gains on put options designated as
cash flow hedges of $37 thousand, $8.7 million of net
unrealized losses on cross-currency interest rate swaps
designated as cash flow hedging transactions and unrealized
losses on terminated cross-currency interest rate swaps of
$3.5 million at June 30, 2009, compared to net
unrealized losses on put options designated as cash flow hedges
of $0.2 million and net unrealized losses on cross-currency
interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedging transactions
of $3.6 million at June 30, 2008.
22. | Unaudited Quarterly Operating Results |
Summarized quarterly financial data for the fiscal years ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows (restated for the
impact of the adoption of FSP APB 14-1 and SFAS 160 - see Note 2.):
Year |
||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended |
Ended |
|||||||||||||||||||
September 30 | December 31 | March 31 | June 30 | June 30 | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) |
||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2009:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 153,076 | $ | 132,173 | $ | 118,164 | $ | 124,440 | $ | 527,853 | ||||||||||
Income before income taxes
|
16,513 | 19,931 | 14,074 | (42,317 | ) | 8,201 | ||||||||||||||
Net income
|
11,287 | 9,548 | 5,713 | (33,370 | ) | (6,822 | ) | |||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share
|
0.47 | 0.40 | 0.24 | 1.39 | (0.28 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share
|
0.46 | 0.40 | 0.24 | 1.39 | (0.28 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2008:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 130,856 | $ | 141,721 | $ | 149,313 | $ | 150,294 | $ | 572,184 | ||||||||||
Income before income taxes
|
18,605 | 19,995 | 20,643 | 20,136 | 79,379 | |||||||||||||||
Net income
|
10,149 | 11,059 | 11,841 | 10,315 | 43,364 | |||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share
|
0.42 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.43 | 1.80 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share
|
0.41 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.42 | 1.77 |
23. | Subsequent Events |
In
connection with the reissuance of the consolidated financial statements included in the Companys Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 to give retrospective application of FSP APB 14-1 and SFAS
160, the Company has updated its procedures related to disclosure of subsequent events through
November 20, 2009. The following items are being disclosed in connection with this update.
On October 2, 2009 the Company entered into an agreement to acquire a merchant cash advance
business in the United Kingdom. The acquired company primarily provides working capital needs to
small retail businesses by providing cash advances against a percentage of future credit card
sales. The purchase price for the acquired company, which currently manages a receivable portfolio
of approximately $3.0 million, was $4.9 million.
On October 28, 2009 the Company entered into an agreement to acquire Military Financial Services,
LLC (MFS). MFS is an established business that provides services to active military personnel to
obtain auto loans in the United States made by a third-party national bank. The third-party
national bank approves the loan application, funds and services the loans and bears the credit
risks. The purchase price payable by the Company is approximately $118 million, as adjusted to
reflect the working capital of MFS and its subsidiaries as of the closing date as provided in the
purchase agreement. The consummation of the acquisition is subject to the consent of the Companys
lenders under its current senior credit facility, the procurement by the Company and its
subsidiaries of sufficient financing and the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions.
The Company expects to complete the acquisition in December 2009, however there is no assurance
that the acquisition will be consummated at that time or thereafter. The purchase agreement may be
terminated by the Company or the sellers at any time after December 31, 2009 due to a failure to
satisfy any of the closing conditions.
45