Attached files

file filename
8-K - FORM 8-K - DFC GLOBAL CORP.w76019e8vk.htm
EX-99.3 - EX-99.3 - DFC GLOBAL CORP.w76019exv99w3.htm
EX-99.1 - EX-99.1 - DFC GLOBAL CORP.w76019exv99w1.htm
EX-99.4 - EX-99.4 - DFC GLOBAL CORP.w76019exv99w4.htm
EX-23.1 - EX-23.1 - DFC GLOBAL CORP.w76019exv23w1.htm
EX-99.2 - EX-99.2 - DFC GLOBAL CORP.w76019exv99w2.htm
Exhibit 99.5
Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Dollar Financial Corp.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Dollar Financial Corp. as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Dollar Financial Corp. at June 30, 2009 and 2008 and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Staff Position APB 14-1, Accounting for convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement) and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an Amendment of ARB No. 51, effective July 1, 2009, and restrospectively adjusted all periods presented in the consolidated financial statements referred to above for the changes.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Dollar Financial Corp.’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated September 3, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
September 3, 2009, except for the retrospective adoption of accounting principles described in Note 2 and the subsequent events disclosed in Note 23, as to which the date is November 20, 2009.

1


 

PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1.   Financial Statements
 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
 
 
                 
    June 30,  
    2008     2009  
 
ASSETS
Current Assets
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 209,714     $ 209,602  
Loans receivable, net:
               
Loans receivable
    123,683       126,826  
Less: Allowance for loan losses
    (7,853 )     (12,132 )
                 
Loans receivable, net
    115,830       114,694  
Loans in default, net of an allowance of $22,580 and $17,000
    11,317       6,436  
Other receivables
    11,031       7,299  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    18,938       22,794  
Current deferred tax asset, net of valuation allowance of $4,335 and $4,816
    471       39  
                 
Total current assets
    367,301       360,864  
Deferred tax asset, net of valuation allowance of $76,573 and $84,972
    11,720       27,062  
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $98,302 and $99,803
    68,033       58,614  
Goodwill and other intangibles
    470,731       454,347  
Debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization of $4,323 and $6,815
    13,597       9,869  
Other
    10,030       10,709  
                 
Total Assets
  $ 941,412     $ 921,465  
                 
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
               
Accounts payable
  $ 51,054     $ 36,298  
Income taxes payable
    12,194       14,834  
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
    32,189       70,588  
Debt due within one year
    9,187       5,880  
Current deferred tax liability
          71  
                 
Total current liabilities
    104,624       127,671  
Fair value of derivatives
    37,214       10,223  
Long-term deferred tax liability
    22,352       18,876  
Long-term debt
    526,399       530,425  
Other non-current liabilities
    11,391       25,192  
Stockholders’ equity:
               
Common stock, $.001 par value: 55,500,000 shares authorized; 24,229,178 shares and 24,102,985 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2009, respectively
    24       24  
Additional paid-in capital
    309,113       311,301  
Accumulated deficit
    (103,759 )     (110,581 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    34,054       8,018  
                 
Total Dollar Financial Corp. stockholders’ equity
    239,432       208,762  
                 
Non controlling interests
          316  
                 
Total stockholders’ equity
    239,432       209,078  
                 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
  $ 941,412     $ 921,465  
                 
 
See notes to interim unaudited consolidated financial statements


2


 

DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands except share and per share amounts)
 
 
                         
    Year Ended June 30,  
    2007     2008     2009  
 
Revenues:
                       
Check cashing
  $ 166,754     $ 196,580     $ 164,598  
Fees from consumer lending
    227,445       292,517       275,272  
Money transfer fees
    20,879       27,512       26,823  
Franchise fees and royalties
    6,958       4,998       4,211  
Other
    33,696       50,577       56,949  
                         
Total revenues
    455,732       572,184       527,853  
                         
Store and regional expenses:
                       
Salaries and benefits
    129,522       159,363       145,716  
Provision for loan losses
    45,799       58,458       52,136  
Occupancy
    32,270       43,018       41,812  
Depreciation
    9,455       13,663       13,075  
Returned checks, net and cash shortages
    15,295       20,360       16,021  
Telephone and communications
    6,425       7,185       7,504  
Advertising
    9,034       9,398       8,359  
Bank charges and armored carrier service
    10,619       13,494       13,357  
Other
    41,822       48,015       48,069  
                         
Total store and regional expenses
    300,241       372,954       346,049  
                         
Store and regional margin
    155,491       199,230       181,804  
                         
Corporate and other expenses:
                       
Corporate expenses
    53,327       70,859       68,217  
Other depreciation and amortization
    3,390       3,902       3,827  
Interest expense, net
    31,462       44,378       43,696  
Loss on extinguishment of debt
    31,784              
Goodwill impairment and other charges
    24,301              
Unrealized foreign exchange loss (gain)
    7,551             (5,499 )
(Proceeds from) provision for litigation settlements
    (3,256 )     345       57,920  
Loss on store closings
    964       993       10,340  
Other expense (income), net
    436       (626 )     (4,898 )
                         
Income before income taxes
    5,532       79,379       8,201  
Income tax provision
    37,735       36,015       15,023  
                         
Net (loss) income
  $ (32,203 )   $ 43,364     $ (6,822 )
                         
Net (loss) income per share:
                       
Basic
  $ (1.37 )   $ 1.80     $ (0.28 )
Diluted
  $ (1.37 )   $ 1.77     $ (0.28 )
Weighted average shares outstanding:
                       
Basic
    23,571,203       24,106,392       24,012,705  
Diluted
    23,571,203       24,563,229       24,012,705  
 
See accompanying notes.


3


 

DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands, except share data)
 
 
                                                         
                                Accumulated
       
                                Other
    Total
 
    Common Stock
    Additional
              Comprehensive
    Shareholders’
 
    Outstanding     Paid-in
    Accumulated
    Noncontrolling   (Loss)
    (Deficit)
 
    Shares     Amount     Capital     Deficit     Interest   Income     Equity  
 
Balance, June 30, 2006
    23,399,107     $ 23     $ 242,594     $ (114,920 )       $ 34,256     $ 161,953  
Comprehensive income
                                                     
Foreign currency translation
                                          2,940       2,940  
Cash Flow Hedges
                                          4,426       4,426  
Net loss
                            (32,203 )                 (32,203 )
                                                       
Total comprehensive loss
                                                  (24,837 )
Debt discount
                    53,916                             53,916  
Secondary stock offering
                    (41 )                           (41 )
Restricted stock grants
    25,793                                              
Restricted stock vested
                    393                             393  
Stock options exercised
    708,900       1       6,931                             6,932  
Other stock compensation
                    1,583                             1,583  
                                                       
Balance, June 30, 2007
    24,133,800       24       305,376       (147,123 )     0     41,622       199,899  
                                                       
Comprehensive income
                                                     
Foreign currency translation
                                          302       302  
Cash Flow Hedges
                                          (7,870 )     (7,870 )
Net income
                            43,364                   43,364  
                                                       
Total comprehensive income
                                                  35,796  
Restricted stock grants
    53,108                                              
Vested portion of granted restricted
                                                     
stock and restricted stock units
                    923                             923  
Stock options exercised
    79,544               1,055                             1,055  
Retirement of common stock
    (37,274 )                                            
Other stock compensation
                    1,759                             1,759  
                                                       
Balance, June 30, 2008
    24,229,178       24       309,113       (103,759 )     0     34,054       239,432  
                                                       
Comprehensive income
                                                     
Foreign currency translation
                                          (17,884 )     (17,884 )
Cash Flow Hedges
                                          (8,152 )     (8,152 )
Net income
                            (6,822                 (6,822
                                                       
Total comprehensive income
                                                  (32,858 )
Purchase shares of Optima, S.A.
                                  316             316    
Restricted stock grants
    180,655                                              
Stock options exercised
    260,545               3,317                             3,317  
Vested portion of granted restricted
                                                     
stock and restricted stock units
                    3,626                             3,626  
Purchase and retirement of treasury shares
    (535,799 )             (7,492 )                           (7,492 )
Retirement of common stock
    (31,594 )                                            
Other stock compensation
                    2,737                             2,737  
                                                       
Balance, June 30, 2009
    24,102,985     $ 24     $ 311,301     $ (110,581 )   $ 316   $ 8,018     $ 209,078  
                                                       
 
See accompanying notes.


4


 

DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
 
                         
    Year Ended June 30,  
    2007     2008     2009  
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
                       
Net income (loss)
  $ (32,203 )   $ 43,364     $ (6,822 )
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
                       
Depreciation and amortization
    14,538       20,624       19,912  
Non-cash interest cost on 2.875% Senior Convertible Notes
            8,142       8,933  
Loss on extinguishment of debt
    31,784       97        
Provision for loan losses
    45,799       58,458       52,136  
Non-cash stock compensation
    1,976       2,682       6,363  
Losses on store closings
    657       518       3,232  
Goodwill impairment
    28,482              
Foreign currency loss (gain) on revaluation of debt
    6,248             (5,499 )
Deferred tax provision (benefit)
    1,694       5,972       (10,549 )
Other, net
    (121 )     341        
Change in assets and liabilities (net of effect of acquisitions):
                       
Increase in loans and other receivables
    (59,395 )     (76,478 )     (44,342 )
Increase in prepaid expenses and other
    (4,870 )     (9,943 )     (5,563 )
Provision for litigation settlements
                49,219  
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
    (5,312 )     26,979       (7,816 )
                         
Net cash provided by operating activities
    29,277       80,756       59,204  
Cash flows from investing activities:
                       
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
    (151,216 )     (143,428 )     (26,219 )
Additions to property and equipment
    (19,435 )     (23,528 )     (15,735 )
                         
Net cash used in investing activities
    (170,651 )     (166,956 )     (41,954 )
Cash flows from financing activities:
                       
Decrease in restricted cash
    79,736       1,014        
Proceeds from term loans
    375,000              
Proceeds from 2.875% Senior Convertible Notes
    200,000              
Proceeds from termination of cross currency swaps
                14,353  
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
    6,932       1,055       3,317  
Purchase of company stock
                (7,492 )
Other debt payments
    (3,181 )     (4,391 )     (3,619 )
Repayment of 9.75% Senior Notes due 2011
    (292,424 )     (2,179 )      
Convertible debt refinancing
    (6,463 )            
Net (decrease) increase in revolving credit facilities
    (40,359 )     5,243       (3,762 )
Payment for secondary public stock offering costs
    (41 )            
Payment of debt issuance costs
    (11,842 )     (454 )     (128 )
                         
Net cash provided by financing activities
    307,358       288       2,669  
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
    6,308       4,681       (20,031 )
                         
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    172,292       (81,231 )     (112 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    118,653       290,945       209,714  
                         
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 290,945     $ 209,714     $ 209,602  
                         
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
                       
Interest paid
  $ 23,000     $ 37,843     $ 32,946  
Income taxes paid
  $ 35,766     $ 29,241     $ 25,788  
 
See accompanying notes.


5


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
1.   Organization and Business
 
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are those of Dollar Financial Corp. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). Dollar Financial Corp. is the parent company of Dollar Financial Group, Inc. (“OPCO”). The activities of Dollar Financial Corp. consist primarily of its investment in OPCO. Dollar Financial Corp. has no employees or operating activities.
 
Dollar Financial Corp. is a Delaware corporation incorporated in April 1990 as DFG Holdings, Inc. The Company operates a store network through OPCO. The Company, through its subsidiaries, provides retail financial services to the general public through a network of 1,206 locations (of which 1,031 are company owned) operating as Money Mart®, The Money Shop, Loan Mart®, Insta-Cheques®, The Check Cashing Store, American Payday Loans, American Check Casher, Check Casher, Payday Loans, Cash Advance, Cash Advance USA and We The People® in 22 states, Canada, the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. This network includes 1,157 locations (including 1,031 company-owned) in 15 states, Canada, the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland offering financial services including check cashing, single-payment consumer loans, sale of money orders, money transfer services, foreign currency exchange and various other related services. Also included in this network is the Company’s Poland operation acquired in June 2009 which provides financial services to the general public through in-home servicing.
 
On January 28, 2005, as a result of the Company’s initial public offering, its common shares began trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “DLLR”.
 
2.   Significant Accounting Policies
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, loss reserves, valuation allowance for income taxes and impairment assessment of goodwill and other intangible assets. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
 
Principles of Consolidation
 
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
Reclassification
 
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. These reclassifications have no effect on net income or stockholders’ equity.
 
Revenue Recognition
 
With respect to company-operated stores, revenues from the Company’s check cashing, money order sales, money transfer, bill payment services and other miscellaneous services reported in other revenues on its statement of operations are all recognized when the transactions are completed at the point-of-sale in the store.
 
With respect to the Company’s franchised locations, the Company recognizes initial franchise fees upon fulfillment of all significant obligations to the franchisee. Royalties from franchisees are recognized as earned. The standard franchise agreements grant to the franchisee the right to develop and operate a store and use the


6


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
2.   Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 

Revenue Recognition (continued)
 
associated trade names, trademarks, and service marks within the standards and guidelines established by the Company. As part of the franchise agreement, the Company provides certain pre-opening assistance including site selection and evaluation, design plans, operating manuals, software and training. After the franchised location has opened, the Company also provides updates to the software, samples of certain advertising and promotional materials and other post-opening assistance that the Company determines is necessary.
 
For single-payment consumer loans that the Company makes directly (company-funded loans), which have terms ranging from 1 to 45 days, revenues are recognized using the interest method. Loan origination fees are recognized as an adjustment to the yield on the related loan. The Company’s reserve policy regarding these loans is summarized below in “Company-Funded Consumer Loan Loss Reserves Policy.”
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
Cash includes cash in stores and demand deposits with financial institutions. Cash equivalents are defined as short-term, highly liquid investments both readily convertible to known amounts of cash and so near maturity that there is insignificant risk of changes in value because of changes in interest rates.
 
Loans Receivable, Net
 
Unsecured short-term and longer-term installment loans that the Company originates on its own behalf are reflected on the balance sheet in loans receivable, net. Loans receivable, net are reported net of a reserve related to consumer lending as described below in the company-funded consumer loan loss reserves policy.
 
Loans in Default
 
Loans in default consist of short-term consumer loans originated by the Company which are in default status. An allowance for the defaulted loans receivable is established and charged against revenue in the period that the loan is placed in default status. The reserve is reviewed monthly and any additional provision to the loan loss reserve as a result of historical loan performance, current and expected collection patterns and current economic trends is charged against revenues. If the loans remain in a defaulted status for an extended period of time, an allowance for the entire amount of the loan is recorded and the receivable is ultimately charged off.
 
Other receivables
 
Other receivables consist primarily of franchise and other third party receivables.
 
Property and Equipment
 
Property and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which vary from three to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term (including renewal options that are reasonably assured) or the estimated useful life of the related asset.
 
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
 
Goodwill is the excess of cost over the fair value of the net assets of the business acquired. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” goodwill is assigned to reporting units, which we have determined to be our reportable operating segments of the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. The Company also has a corporate reporting unit which consists of


7


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
2.   Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (continued)
 
costs related to corporate infrastructure, investor relations and other governance activities. Because of the limited activities of the corporate reporting unit, no goodwill has been assisgned. Goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit that benefit from the synergies arising from each particular business combination. The determination of the operating segments being equivalent to the reporting units for goodwill allocation purposes is based upon our overall approach to managing our business along operating segment lines, and the consistency of the operations within each operating segment. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis on June 30 or between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. To accomplish this, we are required to determine the carrying value of each reporting unit by assigning the assets and liabilities, including the existing goodwill and intangible assets, to those reporting units. We are then required to determine the fair value of each reporting unit and compare it to the carrying amount of the reporting unit. To the extent the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeded the fair value of the reporting unit, we would be required to perform a second step to the impairment test, as this is an indication that the reporting unit goodwill may be impaired. If the amount of implied goodwill (which is the excess of the fair value of the reporting unit determined in the first step over the fair value of the tangible and identifiable intangible assets of the reporting unit), is less than that recorded amount of goodwill, a goodwill impairment charge is recorded for the difference.
 
For the U.S. reporting unit, the amount of goodwill has increased significantly since June 30, 2007 primarily due to the acquisitions of APL and CCS during fiscal 2008. During 2009, the overall fair value of the U.S. reporting unit has declined based on the Company’s internal models; however, the performance of the two aforementioned acquisitions has continued to perform above initial expectations and the recent closure of unprofitable U.S. stores has improved store margins. Therefore, the fair value of the U.S. reporting unit, taken as a whole, continues to exceed its carrying value. The impact of the continued economic downturn, along with any federal or state regulatory restrictions on our short-term consumer lending product could reduce the fair value of the U.S. goodwill below its carrying value at which time we would be required to perform the second step of the transitional impairment test, as this is an indication that the reporting unit goodwill may be impaired.
 
Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of reacquired franchise rights, which are deemed to have an indefinite useful life and are not amortized. Non-amortizable intangibles with indefinite lives are tested for impairment annually as of December 31, or whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that an asset may be impaired. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying amount of the intangible assets with indefinite lives, then an impairment charge would be recognized to reduce the asset to its estimated fair value.
 
We consider this to be one of the critical accounting estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. We estimate the fair value of our reporting units using a discounted cash flow analysis. This analysis requires us to make various judgmental assumptions about revenues, operating margins, growth rates, and discount rates. These assumptions are based on our budgets, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows and marketplace data. Assumptions are also made for perpetual growth rates for periods beyond our long term business plan period. We perform our goodwill impairment test annually as of June 30, and our reacquired franchise rights impairment test annually as of December 31. At the date of our last evaluations, there was no impairment of goodwill or reacquired franchise rights. However, we may be required to evaluate the recoverability of goodwill and other intangible assets prior to the required annual assessment if we experience a significant disruption to our business, unexpected significant declines in our operating results, divestiture of a significant component of our business, a sustained decline in market capitalization, particularly if it falls below our book value, or a significant change to the regulatory


8


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
2.   Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (continued)
 
environment in which we operate. While we believe we have made reasonable estimates and assumptions to calculate the fair value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, it is possible a material change could occur, including if actual experience differs from the assumptions and considerations used in our analyses. These differences could have a material adverse impact on the consolidated results of operations, and cause us to perform the second step impairment test, which could result in a material impairment of our goodwill. We will continue to monitor our actual cash flows and other factors that may trigger a future impairment in the light of the current global recession.
 
Debt Issuance Costs
 
Debt issuance costs are amortized using the effective yield method over the remaining term of the related debt (see Note 7).
 
Store and Regional Expenses
 
The direct costs incurred in operating the Company’s stores have been classified as store expenses. Store expenses include salaries and benefits of store and regional employees, rent and other occupancy costs, depreciation of property and equipment, bank charges, armored carrier services, returned checks, net and cash shortages, advertising, telephone and telecommunication and other costs incurred by the stores. Excluded from store operations are the corporate expenses of the Company, which include salaries and benefits of corporate employees, professional fees and travel costs.
 
Company-Funded Consumer Loan Loss Reserves Policy
 
The Company maintains a loan loss reserve for anticipated losses for consumer loans the Company makes directly through its company-operated locations. To estimate the appropriate level of loan loss reserves, the Company considers known relevant internal and external factors that affect loan collectability, including the amount of outstanding loans owed to the Company, historical loans charged off, current collection patterns and current economic trends. The Company’s current loan loss reserve is based on its net charge-offs, typically expressed as a percentage of loan amounts originated for the last twelve months applied against the principal balance of outstanding loans that the Company makes directly. As these conditions change, the Company may need to make additional allowances in future periods.
 
When a loan is originated, the customer receives the cash proceeds in exchange for a post-dated check or a written authorization to initiate a charge to the customer’s bank account on the stated maturity date of the loan. If the check or the debit to the customer’s account is returned from the bank unpaid, the loan is placed in default status and an allowance for this defaulted loan receivable is established and charged against revenue in the period that the loan is placed in default status. This reserve is reviewed monthly and any additional provision to the loan loss reserve as a result of historical loan performance, current collection patterns and current economic trends is charged against revenues. If the loans remain in defaulted status for an extended period of time an allowance for the entire amount of the loan is recorded and the receivable is ultimately charged off.
 
Check Cashing Returned Item Policy
 
The Company charges operating expense for losses on returned checks during the period in which such checks are returned. Recoveries on returned checks are credited to operating expense in the period during which recovery is made. This direct method for recording returned check losses and recoveries eliminates the


9


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
2.   Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 
need for an allowance for returned checks. The net expense for bad checks included in returned checks, net and cash shortages in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations was $13.1 million, $16.4 million and $12.5 million for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, which represents 0.3%, 0.3% and 0.3% of the total face amount of checks cashed during each respective year.
 
Income Taxes
 
The Company uses the liability method to account for income taxes. Accordingly, deferred income taxes have been determined by applying current tax rates to temporary differences between the amount of assets and liabilities determined for income tax and financial reporting purposes.
 
The Company intends to reinvest its foreign earnings and as a result the Company has not provided a deferred tax liability on foreign earnings.
 
A valuation allowance is provided on deferred tax assets if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the asset will not be realized.
 
Advertising Costs
 
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising costs charged to expense were $10.0 million, $10.8 million and $8.8 million for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The fair value of the Term Loan Facilities is calculated as the sum of the present value of all contractual cash flows. The fair value of the Company’s 2.875% Senior Convertible Notes due 2027 (“Convertible Notes”) are based on broker quotations. The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, loan and other consumer lending receivables, which are short-term in nature and their fair value approximates their carrying value.
 
The total fair value of the Dollar Financial Corp. 2.875% Senior Convertible Notes due 2027 was approximately $135.5 million at June 30, 2008 and $138.5 million at June 30, 2009. The total fair value of the Canadian Term Facility was approximately $226.9 million at June 30, 2009. The total fair value of the U.K. Term Facility was $65.6 million at June 30, 2009.
 
The fair value of loans receivable approximates book value due to the short-term nature of the Company’s loans.
 
Derivatives
 
Put Options
 
Operations in the United Kingdom and Canada have exposed the Company to shifts in currency valuations. From time to time, the Company purchases put options in order to protect aspects of the Company’s operations in the United Kingdom and Canada against foreign currency fluctuations. Out of the money put options are generally used because they cost less than completely averting risk using at the money put options, and the maximum loss is limited to the purchase price of the contracts. The Company has designated the purchased put options as cash flow hedges of the foreign exchange risk associated with the forecasted purchases of foreign-currency-denominated investment securities. These cash flow hedges have maturities of less than twelve months. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portions of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument are initially recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of shareholders’ equity and are subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period during which the hedged transaction is recognized in earnings.


10


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
2.   Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 

Derivatives (continued)
 
Any ineffective portion of the gain or loss is reported in corporate expenses on the statement of operations. For options designated as hedges, hedge effectiveness is measured by comparing the cumulative change in the hedge contract with the cumulative change in the hedged forecasted transactions, both of which are based on forward rates.
 
Cross-Currency Interest Rate Swaps
 
The Company entered into cross-currency interest rate swaps to protect against changes in cash flows attributable to changes in both the benchmark interest rate and foreign exchange rates on its foreign denominated variable rate term loan borrowing under the Company’s credit agreement. Under the terms of these swaps, the Company pays a fixed rate and receives a variable rate.
 
Consistent with the debt payments, on a quarterly basis, all of the cross-currency interest rate swap agreements call for the exchange of 0.25% of the original notional amounts. Upon maturity, these cross-currency interest rate swap agreements call for the exchange of the remaining notional amounts. The Company has designated these derivative contracts as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. The Company records foreign exchange re-measurement gains and losses related to the term loans and also records the changes in fair value of the cross-currency swaps each period in corporate expenses in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. Because these derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges, the Company records the effective portion of the after-tax gain or loss in other comprehensive income, which is subsequently reclassified to earnings in the same period that the hedged transactions affect earnings.
 
On May 7, 2009, the Company executed an early settlement of its two cross-currency interest rate swaps hedging variable-rate borrowings at its foreign subsidiary in the United Kingdom. As a result, the Company discontinued prospectively hedge accounting on these cross-currency swaps. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 133, the Company will continue to report the net gain or loss related to the discontinued cash flow hedge in the other comprehensive income section of stockholders’ equity and will subsequently reclassify such amounts into earnings over the remaining original term of the derivative as the originally hedged forecasted transactions are recognized in earnings.
 
Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions
 
The Company operates check cashing and financial services outlets in Canada and the United Kingdom. The financial statements of these foreign businesses have been translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. All balance sheet accounts are translated at the current exchange rate at each period end and income statement items are translated at the average exchange rate for the period; resulting translation adjustments are made directly to a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions is included in other expense (income), net. Gains and losses resulting from the revaluation of non-functional denominated debt is included in unrealized foreign exchange loss (gain).
 
Earnings per Share
 
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, after adjusting for the dilutive effect of stock options. The


11


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
2.   Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 

Earnings per Share (continued)
 
following table presents the reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands):
 
                         
    Year Ended June 30,  
    2007     2008     2009  
 
Net income (loss)
  $ (32,203 )   $ 43,364     $ (6,822 )
Reconciliation of denominator:
                       
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — basic(1)
    23,571       24,106       24,013  
Effect of dilutive stock options(2)
          429        
Effect of unvested restricted stock and restricted stock unit grants(2)
          28        
                         
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — diluted
    23,571       24,563       24,013  
                         
 
 
(1) Excludes 111, 52 and 105 shares of unvested restricted stock, which are included in total outstanding common shares as of June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. The dilutive effect of restricted stock is included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share using the treasury stock method.
 
(2) The effect of dilutive stock options was determined under the treasury stock method. Due to the net loss during fiscal 2007, the effect of the dilutive options and unvested shares of restricted stock and restricted stock unit grants were considered to be anti-dilutive, and therefore were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share.
 
Stock Based Employee Compensation
 
Effective July 1, 2005 the Company adopted the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation arrangements in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payments” (“SFAS 123R”), using the modified prospective method of transition. Under the provisions of SFAS 123R, the estimated fair value of share based awards is recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period. The Company uses the Black-Scholes Model to estimate the fair value of each option on the date of grant. The Black-Scholes Model estimates the fair value of employee stock options using a pricing model which takes into consideration the exercise price of the option, the expected life of the options, the current market price and its expected volatility, the expected dividends on the stock and the current risk-free interest rate for the expected life of the option. Using the modified prospective method, compensation expense is recognized beginning with the effective date of adoption of SFAS 123R for all shares granted after the effective date of adoption and granted prior to the effective date of adoption and that remain unvested on the date of adoption. The Company grants stock options to employees with an exercise price equal to the fair value of the shares at the date of grant. The fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units are equivalent to the market value on the date of grant and are amortized over the requisite service period.
 
Compensation expense related to share-based compensation included in the statement of operations for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 was $1.5 million, $2.6 million and $4.1 million, respectively, net of related tax effects.


12


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
2.   Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement) (“FSP APB 14-1”). FSP APB 14-1, requires the initial proceeds from convertible debt that may be settled in cash to be bifurcated between a liability component and an equity component. The objective of the guidance is to require the liability and equity components of convertible debt to be separately accounted for in a manner such that the interest expense recorded on the convertible debt would not equal the contractual rate of interest on the convertible debt but instead would be recorded at a rate that would reflect the issuer’s conventional debt borrowing rate. This is accomplished through the creation of a discount on the debt that would be accreted using the effective interest method as additional non-cash interest expense over the period the debt is expected to remain outstanding. The provisions of FSP APB 14-1 are effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2009 and are required to be applied retroactively to all periods presented. FSP APB 14-1, impacts the accounting for the 2.875% Senior Convertible Notes due 2027 and results in additional interest expense of approximately $7.8 million and $8.6 million in fiscal years 2008 and 2009, respectively. Also, the Company reduced, its debt balance by recording a debt discount of approximately $55.8 million, with an offsetting increase to additional paid in capital as of June 30, 2007. Such amount will be amortized over the remaining expected life of the debt.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS 160”). This Statement amends ARB No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. Additionally, this Statement requires that consolidated net income include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. SFAS 160 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2009. With purchase of 76% of Optima S.A. in June 2009 this statement impacts the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
The Company adopted FSP APB 14-1 and SFAS 160 on July 1, 2009. The consolidated financial statements presented herein have been adjusted to reflect the retrospective application of FSP APB 14-1 and SFAS 160. With the adoption of FSP APB 14-1 and SFAS 160, the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Operations were retrospectively adjusted as follows:
Consolidated Balance Sheets
                         
    June 30, 2008
    As Previously        
    Reported   Adjustment   As Adjusted
Debt issuance costs, net
    15,108       (1,511 )     13,597  
Long-term debt
    574,017       (47,618 )     526,399  
Additional paid-in capital
    255,197       53,916       309,113  
Accumulated deficit
    (95,950 )     (7,809 )     (103,759 )
                         
    June 30, 2009
    As Previously        
    Reported   Adjustment   As Adjusted
Debt issuance costs, net
    11,044       (1,175 )     9,869  
Long-term debt
    569,110       (38,685 )     530,425  
Other non-current liabilities
    25,508       (316 )     25,192  
Additional paid-in capital
    257,385       53,916       311,301  
Accumulated deficit
    (94,175 )     (16,406 )     (110,581 )
Non controlling interests
          316       316  
 


13


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
2.   Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations
                         
    Year Ended June 30, 2008
    As Previously        
    Reported   Adjustment   As Adjusted
Interest expense, net
  $ 36,569     $ 7,809     $ 44,378  
Net income
    51,173       (7,809 )     43,364  
Net income per share:
                       
Basic
    2.12       (0.32 )     1.80  
Diluted
    2.08       (0.31 )     1.77  
                         
    Year Ended June 30, 2009
    As Previously        
    Reported   Adjustment   As Adjusted
    (in thousands, except per share amounts)
Interest expense, net
  $ 35,099     $ 8,597     $ 43,696  
Net income (loss)
    1,775       (8,597 )     (6,822 )
Net income (loss) per share:
                       
Basic
    0.07       (0.35 )     (0.28 )
Diluted
    0.07       (0.35 )     (0.28 )
The restated debt and equity components recognized for the Company’s convertible notes as of June 30, 2009 were as follows:
         
Principal amount of convertible notes
  $ 200,000  
Unamortized discount (1)
    38,685  
Net carrying amount
    161,315  
 
(1)   Remaining recognition period of 3.5 years as of June 30, 2009
 
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”), which addresses how companies should measure fair value when they are required to use a fair value measurement for recognition or disclosure purposes under generally accepted accounting principles. As a result of SFAS 157, there is now a common definition of fair value to be used throughout U.S. GAAP. This new standard makes the measurement for fair value more consistent and comparable and improves disclosures about those measures. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 on July 1, 2008.
 
On February 15, 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (“SFAS 159”). This standard permits an entity to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Most of the provisions in SFAS 159 are elective; however, the amendment to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, applies to all entities with available-for-sale and trading securities. The fair value option established by SFAS 159 permits all entities to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. A business entity reports unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The fair value option: (a) may be applied instrument by instrument, with a few exceptions, such as investments otherwise accounted for by the equity method; (b) is irrevocable (unless a new election date occurs); and (c) is applied only to entire instruments and not to portions of instruments. The provisions of SFAS 159 became effective for the Company on July 1, 2008. The Company did not elect the fair value measurement option under SFAS 159 for any of its financial assets or liabilities and, as a result, there was no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141R, Business Combinations (a revision of Statement No. 141), (“SFAS 141R”). This Statement applies to all transactions or other events in which an entity obtains control of one or more businesses, including those combinations achieved without the transfer of consideration. This Statement retains the fundamental requirements in Statement No. 141 that the acquisition method of accounting be used for all business combinations. This Statement expands the scope to include all business combinations and requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at their fair values as of the acquisition date. Additionally, SFAS 141R changes the way entities account for business combinations achieved in stages by requiring the identifiable assets and liabilities to be measured at their full fair values. This Statement is effective on a prospective basis for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, which is July 1, 2009 for the Company. However, the provisions of this Statement


14


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
2.   Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
that amend FASB Statement No. 109 and Interpretation No. 48, will be applied prospectively as of the adoption date and will apply to business combinations with acquisition dates before the effective date of SFAS 141R.
 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
 
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 applies to all derivative instruments and related hedged items accounted for under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133. SFAS 161 requires (1) qualitative disclosures about objectives for using derivatives by primary underlying risk exposure and by purpose or strategy, (2) information about the volume of derivative activity in a flexible format that the preparer believes is the most relevant and practicable, (3) tabular disclosures about balance sheet location and gross fair value amounts of derivative instruments, income statement and other comprehensive income location and amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments by type of contract and (4) disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 161 on January 1, 2009.
 
 
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position SFAS 107-b, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FSP SFAS 107-b”). The FSP amends FASB Statement No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Values of Financial Instruments,” to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial statements as well as in annual financial statements. FSP SFAS 107-b is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009, but early adoption is permitted for interim periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company plans to adopt FSP SFAS 107-b and provide the additional disclosure requirements for its first quarter 2010.
 
In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (SFAS 165). Under SFAS 165, requires companies to evaluate events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the date the financial statements are issued, or available to be issued in the case of non-public entities. SFAS 165 requires entities to recognize in the financial statements the effect of all events or transactions that provide additional evidence of conditions that existed at the balance sheet date, including the estimates inherent in the financial preparation process. Entities shall not recognize the impact of events or transactions that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the balance sheet date but arose after that date. SFAS 165, also requires entities to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. SFAS 165 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 165 for the year ended June 30, 2009, as required, the adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. The Company has evaluated


15


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
2.   Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
 
subsequent events from the balance sheet date through September 3, 2009, and determined there are no material transactions to disclose.
 
In June, 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168 (SFAS 168) “Accounting Standards Codificationtm and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162. SFAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codificationtm as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP. FAS 168 will be effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, for most entities. On the effective date, all non-SEC accounting and reporting standards will be superseded. The Company will adopt SFAS 168 for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, as required, and adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
3.   Supplementary Cash Flow Information
 
Non-Cash Transactions
 
On July 21, 2006, the Company wrote-off $1.5 million of unamortized deferred issuance costs related to the $70.0 million principal repayment of OPCO’s 9.75% Senior Notes due 2011 (“Notes”). On October 30, 2006, the Company wrote-off $7.2 million of unamortized deferred issuance costs related to the $198.0 million principal redemption of the Notes. In fiscal 2007, the Company wrote-off $28.5 million of goodwill and other intangibles related to the reorganization of WTP. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company accrued $57.4 million in relation to the pending Ontario settlement and for the potential settlement of certain of the similar class action proceedings pending in other Canadian provinces.
 
4.   Stock Based Compensation Plan
 
The Company’s 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1999 Plan”) states that 784,392 shares of its common stock may be awarded to directors, employees or consultants of the Company. The awards, at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors, may be issued as nonqualified stock options or incentive stock options. Stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) may also be granted in tandem with the non-qualified stock options or the incentive stock options. Exercise of the SARs cancels the option for an equal number of shares and exercise of the non-qualified stock options or incentive stock options cancels the SARs for an equal number of shares. The number of shares issued under the 1999 Plan is subject to adjustment as specified in the 1999 Plan provisions. No options may be granted after February 15, 2009. All options granted under the 1999 Plan became 100% exercisable in conjunction with the Company’s Initial Public Offering on January 28, 2005.
 
The Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”) states that 1,718,695 shares of its common stock may be awarded to employees or consultants of the Company. The awards, at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors, may be issued as nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options or restricted stock awards. The number of shares issued under the 2005 Plan is subject to adjustment as specified in the 2005 Plan provisions. No options may be granted after January 24, 2015.
 
On November 15, 2007, at the Company’s 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the stockholders adopted the Company’s 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, restricted stock unit awards and performance awards (collectively, the “Awards”) to officers, employees, non-employee members of the Board, independent consultants and contractors of the Company and any parent or subsidiary of the Company. The maximum


16


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
4.   Stock Based Compensation Plan (continued)
 
aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued pursuant to Awards granted under the 2007 Plan is 2,500,000; provided, however, that no more than 1,250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock may be awarded as restricted stock or restricted stock unit Awards. The shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued under the 2007 Plan may be authorized, but unissued, or reacquired shares of common stock. No grantee may receive an Award relating to more than 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in the aggregate per fiscal year under the 2007 Plan.
 
Stock options and stock appreciation rights granted under the aforementioned plans have an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. To date no stock appreciation rights have been granted.
 
The following table presents information on stock options:
 
                                 
                Weighted
       
          Weighted
    Average
       
          Average
    Contractual
    Aggregate
 
          Exercise
    Term
    Intrinsic
 
          Price     (years)     Value  
                      ($ in millions)  
 
Options outstanding at June 30, 2006
                               
(1,622,642 shares exercisable)
    1,715,142     $ 12.07                  
Granted
    310,375     $ 21.96                  
Exercised
    (708,900 )   $ 9.78                  
Forfeited
    (19,017 )   $ 19.30                  
                                 
Options outstanding at June 30, 2007
                               
(1,020,716 shares exercisable)
    1,297,600     $ 15.58                  
Granted
    383,680     $ 18.12                  
Exercised
    (79,544 )   $ 13.25                  
Forfeited
    (59,373 )   $ 17.68                  
                                 
Options outstanding at June 30, 2008
                               
(1,028,778 shares exercisable)
    1,542,363     $ 16.25                  
Granted
    457,723     $ 8.49                  
Exercised
    (260,545 )   $ 12.73                  
Forfeited
    (164,357 )   $ 16.42                  
                                 
Options outstanding at June 30, 2009
    1,575,184     $ 14.56       7.8     $ 3.0  
                                 
Exercisable at June 30, 2009
    911,623     $ 16.37       6.8     $ 0.7  
                                 
 
The aggregate intrinsic value in the above table reflects the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the period and the exercise price of the options, multiplied by the number of in-the-money stock options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on June 30, 2009. The intrinsic value of the Company’s stock options changes based on the closing price of the Company’s stock. The total intrinsic value of options exercised for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 was $13.2 million, $1.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2009 the total unrecognized compensation to be recognized over an estimated weighted-average period of 1.9 years related to stock options is expected to be $2.2 million. Cash received from stock options exercised for the twelve months ended June 30, 2008 and 2009 was $1.1 million and $3.3 million, respectively.


17


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
4.   Stock Based Compensation Plan (continued)
 
The weighted average fair value of each employee option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants during the fiscal years ended 2007, 2008 and 2009:
 
                         
    Year Ended June 30,  
    2007     2008     2009  
 
Expected volatility
    48.3 %     51.0 %     49.6 %
Expected life (years)
    6.0       6.0       5.8  
Risk-free interest rate
    4.68 %     3.68 %     2.51 %
Expected dividends
    None       None       None  
Weighted average fair value
  $ 11.47     $ 9.50     $ 4.12  
 
Restricted stock awards granted under the 2005 Plan become vested (i) upon the Company attaining certain annual pre-tax earnings targets (“performance-based”) and, (ii) after a designated period of time (“time-based”), which is generally three years. Compensation expense is recorded ratably over the requisite service period based upon an estimate of the likelihood of achieving the performance goals. Compensation expense related to restricted stock awards is measured based on the fair value using the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant.
 
Information concerning restricted stock awards is as follows:
 
                 
    Restricted
    Weighted
 
    Stock
    Average
 
    Awards     Price  
 
Outstanding at June 30, 2006
    107,841     $ 18.36  
Granted
    36,924     $ 24.36  
Vested
    (22,483 )   $ 20.25  
Forfeited
    (11,131 )   $ 18.36  
                 
Outstanding at June 30, 2007
    111,151     $ 19.97  
Granted
    12,481     $ 29.42  
Vested
    (50,028 )   $ 19.72  
Forfeited
    (21,299 )   $ 21.36  
                 
Outstanding at June 30, 2008
    52,305     $ 21.90  
Granted
    96,752     $ 9.38  
Vested
    (40,553 )   $ 20.57  
Forfeited
    (3,046 )   $ 18.49  
                 
Outstanding at June 30, 2009
    105,458     $ 11.03  
                 
 
Restricted Stock Unit awards (RSUs) granted under the 2005 Plan and 2007 Plan become vested after a designated period of time (“time-based”), which is generally on a quarterly basis over three years. Compensation expense is recorded ratably over the requisite service period. Compensation expense related to RSUs is measured based on the fair value using the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant.


18


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
4.   Stock Based Compensation Plan (continued)
 
Information concerning restricted stock unit awards is as follows:
 
                 
    Restricted
    Weighted
 
    Stock Unit
    Average
 
    Awards     Grant  
 
Outstanding at June 30, 2006
        $  
Granted
    124,438     $ 28.53  
Vested
        $  
Forfeited
        $  
                 
Outstanding at June 30, 2007
    124,438     $ 28.53  
Granted
    163,595     $ 18.49  
Vested
    (39,818 )   $ 28.35  
Forfeited
    (21,413 )   $ 28.53  
                 
Outstanding at June 30, 2008
    226,802     $ 21.32  
Granted
    306,336     $ 7.88  
Vested
    (102,883 )   $ 21.81  
Forfeited
    (16,329 )   $ 21.12  
                 
Outstanding at June 30, 2009
    413,926     $ 11.25  
                 
 
As of June 30, 2009, there was $4.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted share-based compensation arrangements granted under the plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.3 years. The total fair value of shares vested during twelve months ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 was $0.5 million $2.1 million and $3.1 million, respectively.
 
5.   Employee Retirement Plans
 
Retirement benefits are provided to substantially all U.S. full-time employees who have completed 1,000 hours of service through a defined contribution retirement plan. The Company will match 50% of each employee’s contribution, up to 8% of the employee’s compensation. In addition, a discretionary contribution may be made if the Company meets its financial objectives. The Company’s foreign subsidiaries offer similar plans, the terms of which vary based on statutory requirements.
 
Total contributions charged to expense were $1.1 million, $1.3 million and $1.2 million for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
 
Effective December 31, 2004, the Company established the Dollar Financial Corp. Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan’s primary purpose is to provide tax-advantageous asset accumulation for a select group of management and highly compensated employees. Eligible employees may elect to defer up to fifty percent of base salary and/or one hundred percent of bonus earned. The Administrator, persons appointed by the Company’s Board of Directors, may further limit the minimum or maximum amount deferred by any Participants, for any reason.
 
During fiscal 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved discretionary contributions to the Plan in the amount of $1.8 million. Contributions to the plan become vested (i) upon the Company attaining annual pre-tax earnings targets and, (ii) after a designated period of time, which is between 24 and 36 months. Compensation expense is recorded ratably over the service period based upon an estimate of the likelihood of achieving the performance goals.


19


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
5.   Employee Retirement Plans (continued)
 
During fiscal 2007, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved discretionary contributions to the Plan in the amount of $1.1 million. Each such award was granted July 1, 2007 and vests ratably on an annual basis over a three-year period if, and only if, the Company attains certain strategic objectives as established by the Board of Directors for each fiscal year during the three-year period. The Company attained those strategic objectives for fiscal years 2008 and 2009.
 
There were no discretionary contributions to the Plan approved by the Board of Directors during fiscal years 2008 and 2009.
 
Compensation expense related to discretionary contributions was $0.6, $0.8 million and $0.7 million for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
 
6.   Property and Equipment
 
Property and equipment at June 30, 2008 and 2009 consist of (in thousands):
 
                 
    June 30,  
    2008     2009  
 
Land
  $ 189     $ 156  
Leasehold improvements
    67,308       61,986  
Equipment and furniture
    98,838       96,275  
                 
      166,335       158,417  
Less: accumulated depreciation
    (98,302 )     (99,803 )
                 
Property and equipment, net
  $ 68,033     $ 58,614  
                 
 
Depreciation expense amounted to $12.8 million, $17.6 million and $16.9 million for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
 
7.   Debt
 
The Company had debt obligations at June 30, 2008 and 2009 as follows (in thousands):
 
                 
    June 30,  
    2008     2009  
 
Revolving credit facility
  $ 5,341     $  
Dollar Financial Corp. 2.875% Senior Convertible Notes due 2027
    152,382       161,315  
Term loans due October 2012
    377,863       368,722  
Other
          6,268  
                 
Total debt
    535,586       536,305  
Less: current portion of debt
    (9,187 )     (5,880 )
                 
Long-term debt
  $ 526,399     $ 530,425  
                 
 
On July 21, 2006, the Company used the $80.8 million net proceeds from its follow-on offering of common stock to redeem $70.0 million principal amount of its outstanding 9.75% senior notes due 2011 (“Notes”), pay $6.8 million in redemption premium, pay $1.3 million in accrued interest and use the remaining $2.6 million for working capital purposes.
 
On September 14, 2006, OPCO commenced a cash tender offer for any and all of its outstanding $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Company’s 9.75% senior notes due 2011 on the terms and


20


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
7.   Debt (continued)
 
subject to the conditions set forth in its Offer to Purchase and Consent Solicitation Statement dated September 14, 2006 and the related Consent and Letter of Transmittal. In connection with the tender offer and consent solicitation, OPCO received the requisite consents from holders of the Notes to approve certain amendments to the indenture (“Amendments”) under which the Notes were issued. The Amendments eliminated substantially all of the restrictive covenants and certain events of default. The Amendments to the indenture governing the Notes are set forth in a Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 27, 2006 among OPCO, certain of OPCO’s direct and indirect subsidiaries, as guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, (“Supplemental Indenture”), and became operative and binding on the holders of the Notes as of October 30, 2006, in connection with the closing of the credit facilities, explained below, and the acceptance of the Notes tendered pursuant to the tender offer.
 
The total consideration for the Notes tendered and accepted for purchase pursuant to the tender offer was determined as specified in the tender offer documents, on the basis of a yield to the first redemption date for the Notes equal to the sum of (i) the yield (based on the bid side price) of the 3.00% U.S. Treasury Security due November 15, 2007, as calculated by Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC in accordance with standard market practice on the price determination date, as described in the tender offer documents, plus (ii) a fixed spread of 50 basis points. OPCO paid accrued and unpaid interest up to, but not including, the applicable payment date, October 30, 2006. Each holder who validly tendered its Notes and delivered consents on or prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on September 27, 2006 was entitled to a consent payment, which was included in the total consideration set forth above, of $30 for each $1,000 principal amount of Notes tendered by such holder to the extent such Notes were accepted for purchase pursuant to the terms of the tender offer and consent solicitation. Holders who tendered Notes were required to consent to the Amendments. The total principal amount of the Notes tendered was $198.0 million.
 
On November 15, 2007, the Company redeemed the remaining $2.0 million principal of the Notes at a redemption price of 104.875%, plus accrued and unpaid interest in the amount of $0.1 million.
 
Refinancing of Existing Credit Facility
 
On October 30, 2006, the Company completed the refinancing of its existing credit facilities and entered into a new $475.0 million credit facility (“New Credit Agreement”). The New Credit Agreement is comprised of the following: (i) a senior secured revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount of USD 75.0 million (the “U.S. Revolving Facility”) with OPCO as the borrower; (ii) a senior secured term loan facility with an aggregate amount of USD 295.0 million (the “Canadian Term Facility”) with National Money Mart Company, a wholly-owned Canadian indirect subsidiary of OPCO, as the borrower; (iii) a senior secured term loan facility with Dollar Financial U.K. Limited, a wholly-owned U.K. indirect subsidiary of OPCO, as the borrower, in an aggregate amount of USD 80.0 million (consisting of a USD 40.0 million tranche of term loans and another tranche of term loans equivalent to USD 40.0 million denominated in Euros) (the “UK Term Facility”) and (iv) a senior secured revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount of C$28.5 million (the “Canadian Revolving Facility”) with National Money Mart Company as the borrower.
 
On October 30, 2006, National Money Mart Company borrowed USD 170.0 million under the Canadian Term Facility, Dollar Financial U.K. borrowed USD 80.0 million under the U.K. Term Facility and OPCO borrowed USD 14.6 million under the US Revolving Facility. These funds were used to repurchase USD 198.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the outstanding Notes issued by OPCO pursuant to the previously discussed cash tender offer and consent solicitation for all outstanding Notes, to repay the outstanding principal amounts, accrued interest and expenses under OPCO’s existing credit facility and to pay related transaction costs. On October 31, 2006, National Money Mart Company borrowed an additional USD 125.0 million under the Canadian Term Facility to fund the Canadian Acquisition, as further described below, and to pay related transaction costs.


21


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
7.   Debt (continued)
 
The U.S. Revolving Facility and the Canadian Revolving Facility have an interest rate of LIBOR plus 300 basis points and CDOR plus 300 basis points, respectively, subject to reduction as the Company reduces its leverage. The Canadian Term Facility consisted of USD 295.0 million at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 275 basis points. The U.K. Term Facility consisted of a USD 40.0 million tranche at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 300 basis points and a tranche denominated in Euros equivalent to USD 40.0 million at an interest rate of Euribor plus 300 basis points.
 
In the third quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company’s United Kingdom subsidiary entered into an overdraft facility (“U.K. Revolving Facility”) which provides for a commitment of up to GBP 5.0 million. Amounts outstanding under the U.K. Revolver Facility bear interest at a rate of the Bank base Rate (currently 0.5%) plus 0.5%.
 
At June 30, 2009 there were no amounts outstanding under the U.S. Revolving Facility, the Canadian Revolving Facility nor the U.K. Revolving Facility. At June 30, 2009, the outstanding amount of the Canadian Term Facility was USD 286.9 million and the outstanding amount of the U.K. Term Facility consisted of USD 38.9 million and EUR 30.6 million. Each term loan will mature on October 30, 2012, and will amortize in equal quarterly installments in an amount equal to 0.25% of the original principal amount of the applicable term loan for the first twenty-three (23) quarters following funding, with the outstanding principal balance payable in full on the maturity date of such term loan. Each revolving facility will mature and the commitments there under will terminate on October 30, 2011.
 
The obligations under the U.S. Revolving Facility are guaranteed by the Company and certain direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries of the Company. The obligations under the Canadian Term Facility, the Canadian Revolving Facility and the U.K. Term Facility are guaranteed by the Company and substantially all of its domestic and foreign direct and indirect subsidiaries. The obligations of the respective borrowers and guarantors under the facilities are secured by substantially all of the assets of such borrowers and guarantors.
 
The New Credit Agreement contains certain financial and other restrictive covenants, which, among other things, requires the Company to achieve certain financial ratios, limit capital expenditures, restrict payment of dividends and obtain certain approvals if the Company wants to increase borrowings. As of June 30, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all covenants.
 
2.875% Senior Convertible Notes due 2027
 
On June 27, 2007, the Company issued $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of Dollar Financial Corp. 2.875% Senior Convertible Notes due 2027 (the “Convertible Notes”) in a private offering for resale to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”). The Company received proceeds of approximately $193.5 million from the issuance, net of underwriting fees of approximately $6.4 million. Underwriting fees are included in issuance costs on the Company’s balance sheet and are amortized to interest expense using the effective interest rate method over 5.5 years. The Convertible Notes are general unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of the Company’s other existing and future obligations that are unsecured and unsubordinated. The Convertible Notes bear interest at the rate of 2.875% per year, payable every June 30 and December 31 beginning December 31, 2007. The Convertible Notes mature on June 30, 2027, unless earlier converted, redeemed or repurchased by the Company. Holders of the Convertible Notes may require the Company to repurchase in cash some or all of the Convertible Notes at any time before the Convertible Notes’ maturity following a fundamental change as defined in the Indenture dated June 27, 2007 (the “Indenture”).
 
The Indenture includes a “net share settlement” provision that allows the Company, upon redemption or conversion, to settle the principal amount of the notes in cash and the additional conversion value, if any, in shares of the Company’s common stock. Holders of the Convertible Notes may convert their Convertible Notes


22


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
7.   Debt (continued)
 
based at an initial conversion rate of 25.7759 shares per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes, subject to adjustment, prior to stated maturity under the following circumstances:
 
  •  during any calendar quarter commencing after September 30, 2007, if the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock is greater than or equal to 130% of the applicable conversion price for at least 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last day of the preceding calendar quarter;
 
  •  during the five day period following any five consecutive trading day period in which the trading price of the Convertible Notes for each day of such period was less than 98.0% of the product of the closing sale price per share of the Company’s common stock on such day and the conversion rate in effect for the Convertible Notes on each such day;
 
  •  if such notes have been called for redemption; at any time on or after December 31, 2026; or
 
  •  upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions as described in the Indenture.
 
If a fundamental change, as defined in the Indenture, occurs prior to December 31, 2014 and a holder elects to convert its Convertible Notes in connection with such transaction, the Company will pay a make whole provision, as defined in the Indenture.
 
On or after December 31, 2012, but prior to December 31, 2014, the Company may redeem for cash all or part of the Convertible Notes, if during any period of 30 consecutive trading days ending not later than December 31, 2014, the closing sale price of a share of the Company’s common stock is for at least 120 trading days within such period of 30 consecutive trading days greater than or equal to 120% of the conversion price on each such day. On or after December 31, 2014, the Company may redeem for cash all or part of the Convertible Notes, upon at least 30 but not more than 60 days notice before the redemption date by mail to the trustee, the paying agent and each holder of Convertible Notes. The amount of cash paid in connection with each such redemption will be 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, including any additional amounts, up to but excluding the redemption date.
 
Holders have the right to require the Company to purchase all or a portion of the Notes on December 31, 2012, December 31, 2014, June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2022 (each of which are referred to as the purchase date). The purchase price payable will be equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be purchase plus any accrued and unpaid interest, including any additional amounts, up to but excluding the purchase date.
 
If the Company undergoes a fundamental change, as defined in the Indenture, before maturity of the Convertible Notes, holders will have the right, subject to certain conditions, to require the Company to repurchase for cash all or a portion of the Convertible Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Convertible Notes being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, including any additional amounts, up to but excluding the date of repurchase.
 
The Company has considered the guidance in Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Abstract No. 98-5, “Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratio” (“EITF 98-5”), and has determined that the Convertible Notes do not contain a beneficial conversion feature, as the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance was less than the initial conversion price.
 
Upon conversion, the Company will have the option to either deliver:
 
  1.  cash equal to the lesser of the aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes to be converted ($1,000 per note) or the total conversion value; and shares of the Company’s common stock in respect


23


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
7.   Debt (continued)
 
  of the remainder, if any, of the conversion value over the principal amount of the Convertible Notes; or
 
  2.  shares of the Company’s common stock to the holders, calculated at the initial conversion price which is subject to any of the conversion price adjustments discussed above at any time before December 31, 2006.
 
The Company has made a policy election to settle the principal amount of the Convertible Notes in cash. As such, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 128, Earnings per Share (“FAS 128”), the Notes will be excluded from the Company’s calculation of diluted earnings per share.
 
Interest expense, net was $31.5 million, $44.4 million and $43.7 million for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. Included interest expense is $7.8 million and $8.6 million, of non-cash interest related to the Convertible Notes, for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
 
8.   Income Taxes
 
U.S. income taxes have not been provided on the undistributed earnings of international subsidiaries. The Company’s intention is to reinvest these earnings indefinitely. The Company believes that any U.S. tax on repatriated earnings would be substantially offset by U.S. foreign tax credits and or by use of available net operating loss carry forwards subject to the limitations under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. As of June 30, 2009, there are $129.2 million of undistributed foreign earnings.
 
The Company’s U.S. and foreign income before income taxes for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 is set forth below ( in thousands):
 
                         
    June 30,  
    2007     2008     2009  
 
U.S
  $ (70,032 )   $ (11,987 )   $ (33,963 )
Foreign
    75,564       91,366       42,164  
                         
Total
  $ 5,532     $ 79,379     $ 8,201  
                         
 
The details of the Company’s income tax provision for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 are set forth below (in thousands):
 
                         
    June 30,  
    2007     2008     2009  
 
Current:
                       
U.S. Federal
  $     $ (174 )   $  
Foreign
    36,223       30,297       25,133  
State
          2       183  
                         
Total
  $ 36,223     $ 30,125     $ 25,316  
Deferred:
                       
U.S. Federal
  $ 589     $ 3,314     $ 4,865  
Foreign
    923       2,576       (15,158 )
                         
Total
  $ 1,512     $ 5,890     $ (10,293 )
                         
Total income tax provision
  $ 37,735     $ 36,015     $ 15,023  
                         


24


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
8.   Income Taxes (continued)
 
Below is the reconcilation of income tax expense from the U.S. federal statutory rate to the Company’s effective tax rate for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (in thousands):
 
                         
    June 30,  
    2007     2008     2009  
 
Tax provision at federal statutory rate
  $ 1,936     $ 27,783     $ 2,870  
Add(deduct)
                       
State tax provision
          1       183  
Canadian withholding
    521       349       245  
Effect of foreign operations
    (9,648 )     2,024       (2,769 )
Change in uncertain tax position related to transfer pricing
                (2,853 )
Foreign exchange gain
                3,367  
Other permanent differences
    (5,158 )     (770 )     3,275  
Convertible debt discount
        2,850     3,126  
UK goodwill amortization
                536  
Valuation allowance
    50,084       3,778       7,043  
                         
Tax provision at effective tax rate
  $ 37,735     $ 36,015     $ 15,023  
                         
 
Prior to the global debt restructuring completed in the Company’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, interest expense in the U.S. resulted in U.S. tax losses, thus generating deferred tax assets. The Company provided a valuation allowance against all of its U.S. deferred tax assets at June 30, 2009 and 2008 which amounted to $88.5 million and $79.6 million, respectively. Because realization is not assured, the Company has not recorded the benefit of the deferred tax assets. As of June 30, 2009, the Company has approximately $106.3 million of federal net operating loss carry forwards available to offset future taxable income. The federal net operating loss carry forwards will begin to expire in 2024, if not utilized. The Company has foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately $45.6 million, which will begin to expire in 2017 if not utilized. Additionally, in fiscal 2007 the Company recorded a valuation allowance of $1.3 million against a Canadian foreign currency loss. The loss is capital in nature and at this time the Company has not identified any potential capital gains against which to offset the loss.
 
Additionally, as a result of the adoption of FASB Staff Position APB 14-1 (FSP 14-1), the Company has recorded a reduction to deferred tax assets of $19.5 million on July 1, 2007. Since realization of this reduction to deferred tax assets is not assured, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against this deferred tax liability which resulted in a reduction to the Company’s valuation allowance at June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2009 of $16.7 million and $13.5 million respectively.


25


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
8.   Income Taxes (continued)
 
The details of the Company’s 2007-2009 deferred tax assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2008 and 2009 are set forth below (in thousands):
 
                         
    June 30,  
    2007     2008     2009  
 
Deferred tax assets
                       
Loss reserves
  $ 5,372     $ 5,952     $ 3,817  
Depreciation and amortization
    10,616       10,234       10,752  
Accrued compensation
    1,531       2,446       2,949  
Other accrued expenses
    3,154       1,998       18,660  
Net operating loss carryforwards
    34,718       30,070       36,964  
Foreign tax credit carryforwards
    38,569       45,705       45,590  
Foreign capital loss carryforwards
    1,411       1,473       1,290  
Foreign currency swaps
    3,009       11,128       9,891  
Other
    183       758       516  
                         
Total deferred tax assets
    98,563       109,764       130,429  
Valuation Allowance
    (74,502 )     (80,907 )     (89,788 )
                         
Net deferred tax asset
  $ 24,061     $ 28,857     $ 40,641  
                         
Deferred tax liabilities
                       
Amortization and other temporary differences
  $ (7,679 )   $ (13,267 )   $ (18,876 )
Convertible debt discount
  (19,516 )   (16,666 )   (13,540 )
Foreign currency transactions
    (5,034 )     (9,085 )     (71 )
                         
Total deferred tax liability
    (32,229 )     (39,018 )     (32,487 )
                         
Net deferred tax (liability) asset
  $ (8,168 )   $ (10,161 )   $ 8,154  
                         
 
For purposes of balance sheet presentation, the deferred tax liability related to the convertible debt discount has been netted against the Company’s deferred tax asset.
 
The analysis of the change in the Company’s valuation allowance for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 is set forth below (in thousands):
 
                         
    June 30,  
    2007     2008     2009  
 
Balance at beginning of year
  $ (47,517 )   $ (74,502 )   $ (80,907 )
(Provision)/benefit
    (50,084 )     (3,778 )     (7,042 )
Other additions/(deductions)
    23,099       (2,627 )       (1,839 )  
                         
Balance at end of year
  $ (74,502 )   $ (80,907 )   $ (89,788 )
                         
 
Foreign, federal and state income taxes of approximately $35.8 million, $29.2 million and $25.8 million were paid during the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
 
The Company believes that its ability to utilize pre-2007 net operating losses in a given year will be limited to $9.0 million under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, which the Company refers to as the Code, because of changes of ownership resulting from the June 2006 follow-on equity offering. In addition, any future debt or equity transactions may reduce the Company’s net operating losses or further limit its ability to utilize the net operating losses under the Code. The deferred tax asset related to excess foreign tax credits is also fully offset by a valuation allowance of $45.6 million.


26


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
8.   Income Taxes (continued)
 
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on July 1, 2007. The implementation of FIN 48 did not result in any adjustment in its liability for unrecognized income tax benefits. At the adoption date of July 1, 2007, the Company had unrecognized tax benefit reserves related to uncertain tax positions of $7.6 million. At June 30, 2008 and 2009 the Company had $9.9 million and $7.8 million, respectively of unrecognized tax benefits, primarily related to transfer pricing matters, which if recognized, would reduce the effective tax rate. It is not anticipated that any portion of this reserve will reverse in the next 12 months. The reduction of $2.1 million in the reserve related to uncertain tax positions was principally caused by the impact of a favorable Competent Authority settlement.
 
The tax years ending June 30, 2005 through 2008 remain open to examination by the taxing authorities in the United States, United Kingdom and Canada. The Company just recently settled its Federal audit with the Internal Revenue Service for fiscal 2007 with only an adjustment to its foreign tax credit carryforward but no impact on the Company’s effective tax rate.
 
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had approximately $0.5 million of accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions which remained materially unchanged from the prior year. The provision for unrecognized tax benefits, including accrued interest, is included in income taxes payable.
 
A reconciliation of the liability for uncertain tax position for fiscal 2009 follows:
 
         
Balance at July 1, 2008
  $ 9,919  
Net decreases due to current year tax positions
    (2,146 )
         
Balance at June 30, 2009
  $ 7,773  
         
 
9.   Loss on Extinguishment of Debt
 
On June 16, 2006, the Company announced the pricing of an underwritten follow-on offering of 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $16.65 per share. On June 21, 2006, the Company received $80.8 million in net proceeds in connection with this follow-on offering, which on July 21, 2006 were used to redeem $70.0 million principal amount of the Notes. On October 30, 2006, the Company completed the refinancing of $198.0 million principal amount of the Notes and entered into the New Credit Agreement. On November 15, 2007 the Company redeemed the remaining $2.0 million principal amount outstanding of the Notes.
 
In connection with the redemptions of the aforementioned outstanding principal amounts of the Company’s Notes, the Company incurred related losses on the extinguishment of debt. For the periods presented, the loss incurred on the extinguishment of debt is as follows (in millions):
 
                         
    2007     2008     2009  
 
Call Premium
  $ 6.8     $ 0.1     $  
Write-off of original issue discount, net
    (1.4 )            
Tender premium
    17.6              
Write-off of previously capitalized deferred issuance costs, net
    8.8              
                         
    $ 31.8     $ 0.1     $  
                         


27


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
10.   Commitments
 
The Company has various non-cancelable operating leases for office and retail space and certain equipment with terms ranging from one to five years, most of which contain standard optional renewal clauses. Total rent expense under operating leases amounted to $27.8 million, $37.0 million and $36.0 million for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
 
At June 30, 2009, future minimum lease payments for operating leases are as follows (in thousands):
 
         
Year
  Amount  
 
2010
  $ 33,532  
2011
    27,006  
2012
    20,991  
2013
    15,795  
2014
    11,857  
Thereafter
    25,897  
         
    $ 135,078  
         
 
11.   Acquisitions
 
The following acquisitions have been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting.
 
On August 30, 2007, the Company entered into a purchase agreement to acquire substantially all of the assets of 45 retail stores, operating as Check Casher, American Check Casher, Cash Advance, American Payday Loans, Cash Advance USA and Payday Loans (collectively, “American Payday Loans” or “APL Acquisition”). The purchase price was $29.3 million in cash including $2.0 million in cash that will be held in escrow for 24 months to secure certain indemnification claims. The Company anticipates a full return of the $2.0 million escrow balance. In addition, the agreement included a maximum revenue-based earn-out of up to $3.0 million which would have been payable in February 2009, however the provisions of the earn-out were not met. Between August 2007 and March 2008, we consummated a series of acquisitions of the 45 stores, which were located in Kansas, Missouri, Hawaii, Oklahoma, Arizona, Iowa, South Carolina and Nebraska. The Company allocated a portion of the purchase price to loans receivable for $4.7 million and other assets for $2.6 million. A portion of the proceeds from the $200.0 million senior convertible note offering on June 27, 2007 were utilized to pay for the APL Acquisition. The excess purchase price over the preliminary fair value of identifiable assets acquired was $22.0 million and was recorded to goodwill.
 
On December 15, 2007, the Company consummated the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of 81 financial services stores and one corporate office in southeast Florida (the “CCS Acquisition”) from CCS Financial Services, Inc. d/b/a/ The Check Cashing Store (“CCS”). The acquisition was effected pursuant to the terms of an asset purchase agreement dated October 11, 2007. The aggregate purchase price for the acquisition was $102.1 million cash, including $6.0 million in cash to be held in escrow for 24 months to secure certain indemnification claims. The Company allocated a portion of the purchase price to loans receivable for $7.6 million, cash in stores for $2.1 million, fixed assets for $3.9 million and other assets for $0.5 million. A portion of the proceeds from the $200 million senior convertible note offering on June 27, 2007 was utilized to pay for the CCS Acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired was $88.0 million and was recorded as goodwill.
 
On December 19, 2007, the Company entered into a share purchase agreement to acquire all of the shares of Cash Your Cheque, Ltd, a U.K. entity, which operates seven check cashing and single-payment consumer lending stores. The aggregate purchase price for the acquisition was approximately $4.2 million in cash. The Company used excess cash to fund the acquisition. The Company allocated approximately $0.6 million to net


28


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
11.   Acquisitions (continued)
 
assets acquired. The excess purchase price over the preliminary fair value of the identifiable assets acquired was $3.6 million and was recorded as goodwill.
 
On February 26, 2008, the Company entered into a purchase agreement to acquire substantially all of the assets of 10 financial stores in Ontario, Canada operating under the name Unicash. The aggregate purchase price for the acquisition was $1.4 million cash. The Company used excess cash to fund the acquisition. The Company allocated approximately $0.2 million to the net assets acquired. The excess purchase price over the preliminary fair value of the identifiable assets acquired was $1.2 million and was recorded as goodwill.
 
During fiscal 2008, the Company completed various smaller acquisitions in Canada and the United Kingdom for an approximate purchase price of approximately $8.5 million that resulted in an aggregate increase in goodwill of $4.7 million.
 
On October 17, 2008, the Company entered in a series of purchase agreements to acquire substantially all of the assets of six franchised stores from a franchisee of the Company’s wholly owned United Kingdom subsidiary. The aggregate purchase price for the acquisitions was approximately $3.3 million in cash. The Company used excess cash to fund the acquisition. The company allocated a portion of the purchase price to identifiable intangible assets, reacquired franchise rights, in the amount of $2.6 million and other assets in the amount of $0.7 million. There was no excess purchase price over the preliminary fair value of identifiable assets acquired.
 
On April 21, 2009, the Company entered into a purchase agreement to acquire all of the shares of Express Finance Limited, a U.K. Internet-based consumer lending business. The aggregate purchase price for the acquisition was approximately $6.8 million in cash. In addition, the agreement provides for an earnings-related contingent consideration amount based on the results for the two years following the date of acquisition. No amounts have been recorded for this contingent consideration. The Company used excess cash to fund the acquisition. The Company allocated approximately $0.8 million to net assets acquired including $2.8 million in net loans receivable. The excess purchase price over the preliminary fair value of the identifiable assets acquired was $6.0 million and was recorded as goodwill.
 
On June 29, 2009, the Company entered into a purchase agreement to acquire substantially all of the assets of 2 pawn shops located n Scotland from Robert Biggar Limited. The aggregate purchase price for the acquisition was approximately $8.0 million in cash. The Company used excess cash to fund the acquisition. The Company allocated approximately $3.7 million to net assets acquired. The excess purchase price over the preliminary fair value of the identifiable assets acquired was $4.3 million and was recorded as goodwill.
 
On June 30, 2009, the Company entered into a purchase agreement to acquire 76% of the shares of Optima, S.A., a consumer lending business in Poland. The aggregate purchase price for the acquisition was approximately $5.6 million in cash and the assumption of approximately $6.3 million in debt. The holders of the assumed debt are current shareholders of Optima. In addition, the agreement provides for an earnings-related contingent consideration amount based on the cumulative three year period following the date of acquisition. No amounts have been recorded for this contingent consideration. The Company used excess cash to fund the acquisition. The Company allocated approximately $1.3 million to net assets acquired including $7.4 million in net loans receivable. The excess purchase price over the preliminary fair value of the identifiable assets acquired was $4.6 million and was recorded as goodwill.
 
During fiscal 2009, the Company completed various smaller acquisitions in the United States and the United Kingdom for a purchase price of approximately $2.1 million that resulted in an aggregate increase in goodwill of $1.5 million, calculated as the excess purchase price over the preliminary fair value of the identifiable assets acquired.


29


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
11.   Acquisitions (continued)
 
One of the core strategies of the Company is to capitalize on its competitive strengths and enhance our leading marketing positions. One of the key elements in that strategy is the intention to grow our network through acquisitions. All of the Company’s acquisitions during fiscal year 2009 provide us with increased market penetration or in some cases the opportunity to enter new platforms and geographies. The purchase price of each acquisition is primarily based on a multiple of historical earnings. Our standard business model, and that of the industry’s, is one that does not rely heavily on tangible assets and therefore, it is common to have a majority of the purchase price allocated to goodwill, or in some cases, intangibles.
 
The following reflects the change in goodwill during the periods presented (in millions):
 
         
Balance at June 30, 2008
  $ 419.4  
Acquisitions:
       
Express Finance Limited
    6.0  
Robert Biggar Limited
    4.3  
Optima, S.A. 
    4.6  
Various small acquisitions
    1.5  
Foreign currency adjustment
    (29.3 )
         
Balance at June 30, 2009
  $ 406.5  
         
 
The following unaudited pro forma information for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2009 presents the results of operations as if the acquisitions had occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented. The pro forma operating results include the results of these acquisitions for the indicated periods and reflect the increased interest expense on acquisition debt and the income tax impact as of the respective purchase dates of the APL, the CCS, Express Finance, Robert Biggar and Optima acquisitions. Pro forma results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred had the purchase been made on the date above or the results which may occur in the future.
 
                 
    Fiscal Year Ended June 30,  
    2008     2009  
    (Unaudited — in
 
    thousands except per
 
    share amounts)  
 
Revenues
  $ 614,805     $ 543,711  
Net income/(loss)
  $ 50,597     $ (1,618 )
Net income per common share — basic
  $ 2.10     $ (0.07 )
Net income per common share — diluted
  $ 2.06     $ (0.07 )
 
12.   We The People Restructuring Plan
 
In December 2006, due to the inability to integrate the WTP business with the Company’s existing check cashing and short term consumer lending store network along with the litigation surrounding the WTP business, the Company approved and implemented a restructuring plan for the WTP business, which had previously been included in the Company’s U.S. reporting unit. The restructuring plan includes the closing of all of the company-owned WTP locations and a focus on improving the performance and profitability of the document processing segment of the business by consolidating satellite processing centers and eliminating low volume products and related costs, while concentrating its sales effort, with respect to new WTP franchises, in a select group of targeted states.


30


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
12.   We The People Restructuring Plan (continued)
 
As a result of the restructuring initiatives, in fiscal 2007, the Company incurred $1.2 million for cash expenses related to the closure of the company-operated stores and other initiatives. In addition, the Company incurred $23.2 million in one-time non-cash charges including the write-off of $22.5 million of goodwill and $0.7 million in other tangible and intangible assets, net of deferred fees, which is included in goodwill impairment and other charges on the statement of operations. There were no charges related to the WTP restructuring plan during the fiscal years 2008 and 2009. See Note 13 for further discussion.
 
13.   Goodwill and Other Intangibles
 
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 and the June 30, 2009 are as follows (in thousands):
 
                                 
    United States     Canada     United Kingdom     Total  
 
Balance at June 30, 2007
  $ 94,163     $ 134,081     $ 65,218     $ 293,462  
Acquisition
    111,047       1,870       7,722       120,639  
Foreign currency translation adjustments
          5,892       (642 )     5,250  
                                 
Balance at June 30, 2008
  $ 205,210     $ 141,843     $ 72,298     $ 419,351  
Acquisition
    5,125       51       11,287       16,463  
Foreign currency translation adjustments
          (17,441 )     (11,819 )     (29,260 )
                                 
Balance at June 30, 2009
  $ 210,335     $ 124,453     $ 71,766     $ 406,554  
                                 
 
The following table reflects the components of intangible assets (in thousands):
 
                 
    June 30, 2008     June 30, 2009  
    Gross Carrying
    Gross Carrying
 
    Amount     Amount  
 
Non-amortized intangible assets:
               
Goodwill
  $ 419,351     $ 406,554  
Reacquired franchise rights
    51,380       47,793  
                 
    $ 470,731     $ 454,347  
                 
 
The Company accounts for goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS 142”). Goodwill is the excess of cost over the fair value of the net assets of the business acquired. Intangible assets consist of reacquired franchise rights, which are deemed to have an indefinite useful life and are not amortized.
 
Goodwill is tested for impairment annually as of June 30, or whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that an asset might be impaired. As of June 30, 2009, there is no impairment of goodwill. However, if market conditions continue to worsen or there is significant regulatory action that negatively affects our business, there can be no assurance that future goodwill impairment tests will not result in a charge to earnings.
 
Identified intangibles with indefinite lives are tested for impairment annually as of December 31, or whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that an asset may be impaired. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying amount of the intangible assets with indefinite lives, then an impairment charge would be recognized to reduce the asset to its estimated fair value. As of December 31, 2008, there


31


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
13.   Goodwill and Other Intangibles (continued)
 
was no impairment of reacquired franchise rights. There can be no assurance that future impairment tests will not result in a charge to earnings.
 
The fair value of the Company’s goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are estimated based upon a present value technique using discounted future cash flows. The Company uses management business plans and projections as the basis for expected future cash flows. Assumptions in estimating future cash flows are subject to a high degree of judgment. The Company makes every effort to forecast its future cash flows as accurately as possible at the time the forecast is developed. However, changes in assumptions and estimates may affect the implied fair value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets and could result in an additional impairment charge in future periods.
 
14.   Contingent Liabilities
 
Due to the uncertainty surrounding the litigation process, except for those matters where an accrual has been provided for, the Company is unable to reasonably estimate the range of loss, if any, at this time in connection with the legal proceedings discussed below. While the outcome of many of these matters is currently not determinable, the Company believes it has meritorious defenses and that the ultimate cost to resolve these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In addition to the legal proceedings discussed below, the Company is involved in routine litigation and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business.
 
We assess the materiality of litigation by reviewing a range of qualitative and quantitative factors. These factors include the size of the potential claims, the merits of the Company’s defenses and the likelihood of plaintiffs’ success on the merits, the regulatory environment that could impact such claims and the potential impact of the litigation on our business. The Company evaluates the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome of the legal or regulatory proceedings to which it is a party in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” This assessment is subjective based on the status of the legal proceedings and is based on consultation with in-house and external legal counsel. The actual outcomes of these proceedings may differ from the Company’s assessments.
 
Canadian Legal Proceedings
 
On August 19, 2003, a former customer in Ontario, Canada, Margaret Smith commenced an action against OPCO and the Company’s Canadian subsidiary, Money Mart, on behalf of a purported class of Ontario borrowers who, Smith claims, were subjected to usurious charges in payday-loan transactions. The action, which is pending in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, alleges violations of a Canadian federal law proscribing usury, seeks restitution and damages, including punitive damages, and seeks injunctive relief prohibiting further alleged usurious charges. The plaintiff’s motion for class certification was granted on January 5, 2007. The trial of the common issues commenced on April 27, 2009 but was suspended when the parties reached a settlement. During the fiscal quarter and fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, our Canadian subsidiary, Money Mart, recorded a charge of US$57.4 million in relation to the pending Ontario settlement and for the potential settlement of certain of the similar class action proceedings pending in other Canadian provinces described below. There is no assurance that the Ontario settlement of a class action proceeding in the provinces of Canada will receive final Court approval or that any of the other class action proceedings will be settled. Although we believe that we have meritorious defenses to the claims in the proceedings and intend to vigorously defend against such claims, the ultimate cost of resolution of such claims, either through settlements or pursuant to litigation, may substantially exceed the amount accrued at June 30, 2009, and additional accruals may be required in the future. Of the amount recorded, $6.5 million was paid during the


32


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
14.   Contingent Liabilities (continued)
 

Canadian Legal Proceedings (continued)
 
fourth quarter, and the remaining provision of approximately $50.9 million is included in the Company’s accrued expenses.
 
On November 6, 2003, Gareth Young, a former customer, commenced a purported class action in the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Canada on behalf of a class of consumers who obtained short-term loans from Money Mart in Alberta, alleging, among other things, that the charge to borrowers in connection with such loans is usurious. The action seeks restitution and damages, including punitive damages. On December 9, 2005, Money Mart settled this action, subject to court approval. On March 3, 2006, just prior to the date scheduled for final court approval of the settlement, the plaintiff’s lawyers advised that they would not proceed with the settlement and indicated their intention to join a purported national class action. No steps have been taken in the action since March 2006. Subsequently, Money Mart commenced an action against the plaintiff and the plaintiff’s lawyer for breach of contract. This latter action has since been resolved.
 
On March 5, 2007, a former customer, H. Craig Day, commenced an action against OPCO, Money Mart and several of the Company’s franchisees in the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Canada on behalf of a putative class of consumers who obtained short-term loans from Money Mart in Alberta. The allegations, putative class and relief sought in the Day action are substantially the same as those in the Young action but relate to a claim period that commences before and ends after the claim period in the Young action and excludes the claim period described in that action.
 
On January 29, 2003, a former customer, Kurt MacKinnon, commenced an action against Money Mart and 26 other Canadian lenders on behalf of a purported class of British Columbia residents who, MacKinnon claims were overcharged in payday-loan transactions. The action, which is pending in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, alleges violations of laws proscribing usury and unconscionable trade practices and seeks restitution and damages, including punitive damages, in an unknown amount. Following initial denial, MacKinnon obtained an order permitting him to re-apply for class certification of the action against Money Mart alone, which was appealed. The Court of Appeal granted MacKinnon the right to apply to the original judge to have her amend her order denying class certification. On June 14, 2006, the original judge granted the requested order and Money Mart’s request for leave to appeal the order was dismissed. The certification motion in this action proceeded in conjunction with the certification motion in the Parsons action described below.
 
On April 15, 2005, the solicitor acting for MacKinnon commenced a proposed class action against Money Mart on behalf of another former customer, Louise Parsons. Class certification of the consolidated MacKinnon and Parsons actions was granted on March 14, 2007. In December 2007 the plaintiffs filed a motion to add OPCO as a defendant in this action and in March 2008 an order was granted adding OPCO as a defendant. On July 25, 2008, the plaintiffs’ motion to certify the action against OPCO was granted. The action against Money Mart and OPCO is presently in the discovery phase and a summary trial is scheduled to commence in March 2010.
 
Similar purported class actions have been commenced against Money Mart in Manitoba, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland. OPCO is named as a defendant in the actions commenced in Nova Scotia and Newfoundland. The claims in these additional actions are substantially similar to those of the Ontario action referred to above.
 
On April 26, and August 3, 2006, two former employees, Peggy White and Kelly Arseneau, commenced companion actions against Money Mart and OPCO. The actions, which are pending in the Superior Court of Ontario, allege negligence on the part of the defendants in security training procedures and breach of fiduciary duty to employees in violation of applicable statutes. The companion lawsuits seek combined damages of


33


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
14.   Contingent Liabilities (continued)
 

Canadian Legal Proceedings (continued)
 
C$5.0 million plus interest and costs. These claims have been submitted to the respective insurance carriers. The Company intends to defend these actions vigorously.
 
At this time, it is too early to determine the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or the ultimate liability, if any, resulting from these matters.
 
California Legal Proceedings
 
On September 11, 2006, Caren Bufil commenced a lawsuit against OPCO; the claims in Bufil are substantially similar to the claims in a previously dismissed case. Bufil seeks class certification of the action alleging that OPCO failed to provide non-management employees with meal and rest breaks required under California law. The suit seeks an unspecified amount of damages and other relief. OPCO filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that the Bufil case is duplicative of the previous case and should be dismissed. Plaintiff filed her motion for class certification. OPCO’s motion was granted and Bufil’s motion was denied. Bufil appealed both rulings. In April 2008, the Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s ruling. OPCO filed a petition for review of that decision with the California Supreme Court, but in July 2008 the Court denied the petition. The case was then returned to the trial court level and was assigned to the complex division. The trial court ordered briefing and a hearing on the issue of what discretion the trial court had on plaintiff’s motion for class certification. After the hearing, the trial court ruled that it had to follow the Court of Appeal’s decision on class certification issues and ordered that the plaintiff’s proposed class and sub-classes be certified. At this time, it is too early to determine the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or the ultimate liability, if any, resulting from the Bufil case.
 
On April 26, 2007, the San Francisco City Attorney (“City Attorney”) filed a complaint in the name of the People of the State of California alleging that OPCO’s subsidiaries engaged in unlawful and deceptive business practices in violation of California Business and Professions Code Section 17200 by either themselves making installment loans under the guise of marketing and servicing for co-defendant First Bank of Delaware (the “Bank”) or by brokering installment loans made by the Bank in California in violation of the prohibition on usury contained in the California Constitution and the California Finance Lenders Law and that they have otherwise violated the California Finance Lenders Law and the California Deferred Deposit Transaction Law. The complaint seeks broad injunctive relief as well as civil penalties. On January 5, 2009, the City Attorney filed a First Amended Complaint, restating the claims in the original complaint, adding OPCO as a defendant and adding a claim that short-term deferred deposit loans made by the Bank, which were marketed and serviced by OPCO and/or its subsidiaries violated the California Deferred Deposit Transaction law. OPCO and its subsidiaries have denied the allegations of the First Amended Complaint. Discovery is proceeding in state court and no trial date has been set. At this time, it is too early to determine the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or the ultimate liability, if any, resulting from this case.
 
We The People Legal Proceedings
 
The Company’s business model for its legal document processing services business is being challenged in certain courts, as described below, which could result in the Company’s discontinuation of these services in any one or more jurisdictions. The company from which the Company bought the assets of its WTP business, We The People Forms and Service Centers USA, Inc. (the “Former WTP”), certain of its franchisees and/or WTP are defendants in various lawsuits. The principal litigation for the WTP business unit is as follows:
 
In May 2007, WTP met with the New York State Attorney General’s Office, Consumer Affairs Division, which had been investigating WTP operation in the New York City area for over three years. The Attorney


34


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
14.   Contingent Liabilities (continued)
 

We The People Legal Proceedings (continued)
 
General’s Office alleged that WTP engaged in unfair business practices, including deceptive advertising that harmed New York consumers. The Attorney General’s Office demanded that WTP enter into an Agreed Order of Discontinuance (“AOD”) and demanded WTP pay a fine of approximately $0.3 million, plus investigation costs. WTP denied the allegations and requested that the Attorney General’s Office hold the former New York City WTP owners liable for the alleged misconduct. The terms of the AOD are in negotiation.
 
In May 2007, WTP franchisee Roseann Pennisi and her company, We The People of Westchester Square, New York, Inc., sued the Company, Ira and Linda Distenfield, IDLD, and WTP in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Bronx County. The complaint alleges breach of franchise agreement, tortious interference with franchise agreement, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unfair competition against defendants and breach of contract and deception and misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, fraudulent concealment of material facts against the Distenfields and IDLD, Inc. and seeks over $9.0 million in damages. Following a successful motion by WTP to compel arbitration of the plaintiffs’ claims, in October 2008, the plaintiff filed a request to arbitrate with relief requested in the amount of $0.4 million. In August 2009, plaintiff amended her petition to arbitrate and increased it to $650,000. The Company believes the material allegations in the complaint with respect to the Company and WTP are without merit and intends to defend the matter vigorously.
 
In September 2007, Jacqueline Fitzgibbons, who claims to be a former customer of a WTP store, commenced a lawsuit against the Company and others in California Superior Court for Alameda County. The suit alleges on behalf of a putative class of consumers and senior citizens that, from 2003 to 2007, We The People violated California law by advertising and selling living trusts and wills to certain California residents. Fitzgibbons claims, among other things, that the Company and others improperly conspired to provide her with legal advice, misled her as to what, if any, legitimate service We The People provided in preparing documents, and misled her regarding the supervising attorneys’ role in preparing documents. The plaintiff is seeking class certification, prohibition of the Company’s alleged unlawful business practices, and damages on behalf of the class in the form of disgorgement of all monies and profits obtained from unlawful business practices, general and special damages, attorneys’ fees and costs of the suit, statutory and tremble damages pursuant to various California business, elder abuse, and consumer protection codes. The complaint has been amended several times to add new parties and additional claims. The Court granted, in part, the Company’s motion to dismiss certain claims alleged by the plaintiffs. In January 2009, an individual named Robert Blau replaced Fitzgibbons as lead plaintiff. The plaintiffs have moved for class certification and the motion is scheduled to be heard October 19, 2009. The Company is defending these allegations vigorously and believes that the claims and the assertion of class status are without merit.
 
In August 2008, a group of six former We The People customers commenced a lawsuit in St. Louis County, Missouri against the Company, its subsidiary, We The People USA, Inc. and WTP franchisees offering services to Missouri consumers. The plaintiffs allege, on behalf of a putative class of over 1,000 consumers that, from 2002 to the present, defendants violated Missouri law by engaging in: (i) an unauthorized law business, (ii) the unauthorized practice of law, and (iii) unlawful merchandising practices in the sale of its legal documents. The plaintiffs are seeking class certification, prohibition of the defendants’ unlawful business practices, and damages on behalf of the class in the form of disgorgement of all monies and profits obtained from unlawful business practices, attorney’s fees, statutory and treble damages pursuant to various Missouri consumer protection codes. In November 2008, the original six plaintiffs were dismissed by plaintiffs’ counsel and the initial complaint was also later dismissed. In January 2009, former WTP customers, Philip Jones and Carol Martin, on behalf of a punitive class of Missouri customers, filed a lawsuit in St. Louis County against the Company and its subsidiary, We The People USA, Inc., and a St. Louis franchisee entity alleging claims similar to the initial August 2008


35


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
14.   Contingent Liabilities (continued)
 

We The People Legal Proceedings (continued)
 
suit. These new plaintiffs also seek class certification. The Company intends to defend these allegations and believes that the plaintiffs’ claims and allegations of class status are without merit.
 
On January 14, 2009, a demand for arbitration was made on behalf of Thomas Greene and Rebecca M. Greene, We The People franchisees, against We The People USA, Inc., We The People LLC and the Company. The demand alleged violations by We The People of certain state and federal franchise laws relating to (1) failure to register the franchise as a business opportunity with the Utah Division of Consumer Protection; (2) earnings claims representations and (3) failure to provide a disclosure document meeting the substantive and timing requirements mandated by the Utah Business Opportunity Act. The Greenes are demanding $425,000 for losses relating to the violations. WTP and the Company believe the allegations are without merit and intend to defend the matter vigorously.
 
In June 2009, a demand for arbitration was filed by a current We The People franchisee, Frank Murphy, Jr., against the Company’s subsidiaries, We The People USA, Inc., and We The People LLC. The demand alleges violations by We The People of certain obligations under the Franchise Agreement and seeks $1 million for losses relating to these violations. WTP believes the allegations are without merit and intends to defend the matter vigorously.
 
In January 2009, the Company learned that Ira and Linda Distenfield had filed a joint voluntary petition under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In addition to delaying the ultimate resolution of many of the foregoing matters, the economic effect of this filing and, in particular, its effect on the Company’s ability to seek contribution from its co-defendants in connection with any of the foregoing matters, cannot presently be estimated.
 
It is the Company’s opinion that many of the WTP related litigation matters relate to actions undertaken by the Distenfields, IDLD, Inc. and the Former WTP during the period of time when they owned or managed We The People Forms and Service Centers USA, Inc.; this period of time was prior to the acquisition of the assets of the Former WTP by the Company. However, in many of these actions, the Company and WTP have been included as defendants in these cases as well. At this time, it is too early to determine the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or the ultimate liability, if any, of any of the aforementioned matters against WTP or the Company or any other Company litigation as well.
 
In addition to the matters described above, the Company continues to respond to inquiries it receives from state bar associations and state regulatory authorities from time to time as a routine part of its business regarding its legal document processing services business and its WTP franchisees.
 
15.   Credit Risk
 
At June 30, 2008 and 2009, OPCO had 22 and 37, respectively, bank accounts in major U.S. financial institutions in the aggregate amount of $11.9 million and $4.6 million, respectively, which exceeded Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation deposit protection limits. The Canadian Federal Banking system provides customers with similar deposit insurance through the Canadian Deposit Insurance Corporation (“CDIC”). At June 30, 2008 and 2009, the Company’s Canadian subsidiary had 32 and 42 bank accounts, respectively, totaling $116.8 million and $100.1 million, respectively, which exceeded CDIC limits. At June 30, 2008 and 2009 the Company’s United Kingdom operations had 47 and 49 bank accounts, respectively, totaling $5.2 million and $13.6 million, respectively. These financial institutions have strong credit ratings and management believes credit risk relating to these deposits is minimal.


36


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
15.   Credit Risk (continued)
 
In December 2006, the Company entered into cross-currency interest rate swap transactions to hedge against the change in value of the Company’s U.K. Term Facility and Canadian Term Facility denominated in a currency other than OPCO’s foreign subsidiaries’ respective functional currency. Under these cross-currency interest rate swap agreements with the Company’s two swap counter-parties, the Company hedged $375 million of its debt. These financial institutions have strong credit ratings and management believes the credit risk related to these swaps is minimal. On May 7, 2009, the Company terminated its two cross-currency interest rate swaps hedging variable-rate borrowings at its foreign subsidiary in the United Kingdom. As a result, the Company discontinued prospectively hedge accounting on these cross-currency swaps. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 133, the Company will continue to report the net gain or loss related to the discontinued cash flow hedge in other comprehensive income included in shareholders’ equity and will subsequently reclassify such amounts into earnings over the remaining original term of the derivative when the hedged forecasted transactions are recognized in earnings. The aggregate unamortized notional amount of the swaps was $409.3 million and $339.9 at June 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
 
The Company had approximately $114.7 million of net consumer loans on its balance sheet at June 30, 2009 and approximately $115.8 million at June 30, 2008. These amounts are reflected in loans receivable, net. Loans receivable, net at June 30, 2009 and 2008 are reported net of a reserve of $12.1 million and $7.9 million, respectively, related to consumer lending. Loans in default at June 30, 2009 were $6.4 million, net of a $17.0 million allowance, and were $11.3 million, net of a $22.6 million allowance at June 30, 2008.
 
Activity in the allowance for loan losses during the fiscal years ended 2007, 2008 and 2009 was as follows (in thousands):
 
Allowances for Loan Losses
 
                                                 
    Balance at
    Provision for
    Foreign
                   
    Beginning of
    Company-Funded
    Currency
          Net Charge-
    Balance at
 
Description
  Period     Loan Losses     Translation     Acquisitions     Offs     End of Period  
 
June 30, 2009
                                               
Loan loss allowance
  $ 7,853     $ 5,526     $ (1,307 )   $ 5,605     $ (5,545 )   $ 12,132  
Defaulted loan allowance
    22,580       45,529       (1,691 )           (49,418 )     17,000  
June 30, 2008
                                               
Loan loss allowance
    8,623       6,498       (129 )           (7,139 )     7,853  
Defaulted loan allowance
    18,045       50,784       368             (46,617 )     22,580  
June 30, 2007
                                               
Loan loss allowance
    5,365       6,126       464             (3,332 )     8,623  
Defaulted loan allowance
  $ 11,694     $ 32,884     $ 638     $     $ (27,171 )   $ 18,045  
 
16.  Capital Stock
 
On July 21, 2008, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved a stock repurchase plan, authorizing the Company to repurchase in the aggregate up to $7.5 million of its outstanding common stock, which is the maximum amount of common stock the Company can repurchase pursuant to the terms of its credit facility.
 
Under the plan authorized by its Board of Directors, the Company was permitted to repurchase shares in open market purchases or through privately negotiated transactions as permitted under Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 10b-18. The extent to which the Company repurchased its shares and the timing of such repurchases depended upon market conditions and other corporate considerations, as determined by the Company’s management. The purchases were funded from existing cash balances.


37


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
16.   Capital Stock (continued)
 
By October 13, 2008, the Company had repurchased 535,799 shares of its common stock at a cost of approximately $7.5 million, thus completing its stock repurchase plan.
 
17.   Fair Value Measurements
 
SFAS 157 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
 
Currently, the Company uses foreign currency options and cross currency interest rate swaps to manage its interest rate and foreign currency risk. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, foreign exchange rates and implied volatilities. To comply with the provisions of SFAS No. 157, the Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees. Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of June 30, 2009, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
 
The table below presents the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.
 
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis at June 30, 2009
( in thousands)
 
                                 
    Quoted Prices in
                   
    Active Markets
    Significant
             
    for Identical
    Other
    Significant
    Balance at
 
    Assets and
    Observable
    Unobservable
    June 30,
 
    Liabilities (Level 1)     Inputs (Level 2)     Inputs (Level 3)     2009  
 
Assets
                               
Derivative financial instruments
  $     $ 564     $     $ 564  
Liabilities
                               
Derivative financial instruments
  $     $ 10,223     $     $ 10,223  


38


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
17.   Fair Value Measurements (continued)
 
The Company does not have any fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as of June 30, 2009.
 
18.   Loss on Store Closing and Other Restructuring
 
On June 30, 2008 the Company, as part of a process to rationalize its United States markets, made a determination to close 24 of its unprofitable stores in various United States markets. For all but one of these stores, the cease-use date was July 11, 2008 while one other store had a cease-use date of July 25, 2008. Customers from these stores have been transitioned to other Company stores in close proximity to the stores affected.
 
In August 2008, the Company identified an additional 29 stores in the United States and 17 stores in Canada that were underperforming or overlapping and which were closed or merged into a geographically proximate store. The cease-use date for 44 of these stores was in September 2008 with the cease-use date of the final two U.S. stores completed in the month of October. Customers from these stores were transitioned to other Company stores in close proximity to the stores affected.
 
The Company recorded costs for severance and other retention benefits of $0.6 million and store closure costs of $5.8 million consisting primarily of lease obligations and leasehold improvement write-offs related to the June 2008 and August 2008 store closings. These charges were expensed within loss on store closings on the statements of operations. Of the $6.4 million charge, $3.3 million related to the United States segment and $3.1 million for the Canadian segment.
 
During the fourth quarter of the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company announced the closure of an additional 60 U.S. under-performing stores located in states with uncertain or less favorable regulation, or are located in states where the Company only has a few locations resulting in an inefficient and more costly infrastructure. For all of these locations, the cease-use date was prior to June 30, 2009. The Company recorded costs for severance and other retention benefits of $0.4 million and store closure costs of $2.9 million consisting primarily of lease obligations and leasehold improvement write-offs related to this program. Most of these locations were either at or near their lease-end term. The remaining liability accrued for all of the store closures during fiscal 2009 is approximately $1.2 million as of June 30, 2009.
 
19.   Segment Information
 
The Company categorizes its operations into three operating segments that have been identified giving consideration to geographic area, product mix and regulatory environment. The primary service offerings in all operating segments are check cashing, single-payment consumer loans, money orders, money transfers and other ancillary services. As a result of the mix of service offerings and diversity in the respective regulatory environments, there are differences in each operating segment’s profit margins. Additionally, the United States operating segment includes all corporate headquarters expenses that have not been charged out to the operating segments in the United States, Canada and United Kingdom. This factor also contributes to the lower pre-tax results reported in this segment. Those unallocated corporate headquarters expenses are $3.8 million for fiscal year 2007, $2.7 million for fiscal year 2008 and $6.6 million for fiscal year 2009.


39


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
19.   Segment Information (continued)
 
All amounts in thousands
 
                                 
    United
          United
       
    States     Canada     Kingdom     Total  
 
2007
                               
Total assets
  $ 268,690     $ 405,581     $ 157,504     $ 831,775  
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
    94,459       179,665       67,557       341,681  
Sales to unaffiliated customers:
                               
Check cashing
    48,435       66,646       51,673       166,754  
Fees from consumer lending
    73,611       110,010       43,824       227,445  
Money transfers
    4,325       11,678       4,876       20,879  
Franchise fees and royalties
    3,877       3,081             6,958  
Other
    5,757       21,121       6,818       33,696  
                                 
Total sales to unaffiliated customers
    136,005       212,536       107,191       455,732  
Provision for loan losses
    22,299       13,692       9,808       45,799  
Interest expense, net
    13,723       11,634       6,105       31,462  
Depreciation and amortization
    4,295       4,545       4,005       12,845  
Loss on extinguishment of debt
    31,784                   31,784  
Goodwill impairment and other charges
    24,301                   24,301  
Unrealized foreign exchange loss (gain)
          8,362       (811 )     7,551  
Proceeds from litigation settlements
    (3,256 )                 (3,256 )
Loss on store closings
    772       46       146       964  
Other expense (income), net
    301       (323 )     458       436  
(Loss) income before income taxes
    (70,032 )     57,757       17,807       5,532  
Income tax provision
    7,062       25,303       5,370       37,735  
 


40


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
19.   Segment Information (continued)
 
                                 
    United
          United
       
    States     Canada     Kingdom     Total  
 
2008
                               
Total assets
  $ 281,139     $ 473,469     $ 186,804     $ 941,412  
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
    205,506       189,429       75,796       470,731  
Sales to unaffiliated customers:
                               
Check cashing
    57,438       81,806       57,336       196,580  
Fees from consumer lending
    79,838       147,313       65,366       292,517  
Money transfers
    5,744       16,124       5,644       27,512  
Franchise fees and royalties
    2,589       2,409             4,998  
Other
    8,122       31,839       10,616       50,577  
                                 
Total sales to unaffiliated customers
    153,731       279,491       138,962       572,184  
Provision for loan loss
    24,889       27,115       6,454       58,458  
Interest expense, net
    15,168       21,611       7,599       44,378  
Depreciation and amortization
    5,443       7,017       5,105       17,565  
Provision for litigation settlements
    345                   345  
Loss on store closings
    869       119       5       993  
Other expense (income), net
    106       (627 )     (105 )     (626 )
(Loss) income before income taxes
    (11,987 )     68,706       22,660       79,379  
Income tax provision
    3,491       25,721       6,803       36,015  
 
                                 
    United
          United
       
    States     Canada     Kingdom     Total  
 
2009
                               
Total assets
  $ 288,131     $ 446,198     $ 187,136     $ 921,465  
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
    210,631       166,149       77,567       454,347  
Sales to unaffiliated customers:
                               
Check cashing
    56,378       67,830       40,390       164,598  
Fees from consumer lending
    79,612       121,518       74,142       275,272  
Money transfers
    5,926       15,092       5,805       26,823  
Franchise fees and royalties
    1,872       2,339             4,211  
Other
    11,070       29,488       16,391       56,949  
                                 
Total sales to unaffiliated customers
    154,858       236,267       136,728       527,853  
Provision for loan loss
    20,821       23,201       8,114       52,136  
Interest expense, net
    20,594       16,499       6,603       43,696  
Depreciation and amortization
    5,553       5,980       5,369       16,902  
Unrealized foreign exchange gain
                (5,499 )     (5,499 )
Provision for litigation settlements
    444       57,476             57,920  
Loss on store closings
    7,170       2,967       203       10,340  
Other expense (income), net
    353       (3,361 )     (1,890 )     (4,898 )
(Loss) income before income taxes(1)
    (28,983 )     769       36,415       8,201  
Income tax provision
    5,106       (44 )     9,961       15,023  
 
 
(1) (Loss) income before income taxes for the United States and Canada have been adjusted by $4,980. This adjustment is related to the disallowed portion that was repaid by the United States to its Canadian subsidiary associated with the settlement granted in the competent authority tax proceeding.

41


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
20.   Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
 
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
 
The Company is exposed to certain risk arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its debt funding and by the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, certain of the Company’s foreign operations in the United Kingdom and Canada expose the Company to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. These fluctuations may impact the value of the Company’s cash receipts and payments in terms of the Company’s functional currency. The Company enters into derivative financial instruments to protect the value or fix the amount of certain obligations in terms of its functional currency, the U.S. Dollar.
 
Cash Flow Hedges of Foreign Exchange Risk
 
Operations in the United Kingdom and Canada have exposed the Company to changes in the CAD-USD and GBP-USD foreign exchange rates. From time to time, the Company’s U.K and Canadian subsidiaries purchase investment securities denominated in a currency other than their functional currency. The subsidiaries hedge the related foreign exchange risk typically with the use of out of the money put options because they cost less than completely averting risk using at the money put options, and the maximum loss is limited to the purchase price of the contracts.
 
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges of foreign exchange risk is recorded in other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative, as well as amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness, is recognized directly in earnings. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had the following outstanding foreign currency derivatives that were used to hedge its foreign exchange risks for the month of July:
 
                 
    Notional
    Notional
 
Foreign Currency Derivates
  Sold     Purchased  
 
CAD Put/USD Call Options
  C$ 12,000,000     $ 10,810,811  
GBP Put/USD Call Options
    GBP 3,600,000     $ 5,760,000  
 
During August 2009 the Company purchased additional foreign currency derivatives to hedge its foreign exchange risks for the months of October, November and December 2009.
 
Cash Flow Hedges of Multiple Risks
 
The Company has foreign subsidiaries in the United Kingdom and Canada with variable-rate borrowings denominated in currencies other than the foreign subsidiaries’ functional currencies. The foreign subsidiaries are exposed to fluctuations in both the underlying variable borrowing rate and the foreign currency of the borrowing against its functional currency. The foreign subsidiaries use foreign currency derivatives including cross-currency interest rate swaps to manage its exposure to fluctuations in the variable borrowing rate and the foreign exchange rate. Cross-currency interest rate swaps involve both periodically (1) exchanging fixed rate interest payments for floating rate interest receipts and (2) exchanging notional amounts which will occur at the forward exchange rates in effect upon entering into the instrument. The derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges of both interest rate and foreign exchange risks.
 
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges of both interest rate risk and foreign exchange risk is recorded in other comprehensive income and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings.


42


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
20.   Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (continued)
 

Cash Flow Hedges of Multiple Risks (continued)
 
The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative is recognized directly in earnings. The Company reclassifies from other comprehensive income to corporate expenses an amount that will offset the related re-measurement gains and losses on the foreign-currency denominated variable-rate borrowings also recorded in corporate expenses.
 
On May 7, 2009, the Company executed an early settlement of its two cross-currency interest rate swaps hedging variable-rate borrowings at its foreign subsidiary in the United Kingdom. As a result, the Company discontinued prospectively hedge accounting on these cross-currency swaps. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 133, the Company will continue to report the net gain or loss related to the discontinued cash flow hedge in other comprehensive income included in shareholders’ equity and will subsequently reclassify such amounts into earnings over the remaining original term of the derivative when the hedged forecasted transactions are recognized in earnings.
 
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had the following outstanding derivatives that were used to hedge both interest rate risk and foreign exchange risk:
 
                             
    Pay Fixed
    Pay Fixed Strike
    Receive Floating
    Receive Floating
Foreign Currency Derivates
  Notional     Rate     Notional     Index
 
USD-CAD Cross Currency Swap
    CAD184,503,955       7.135 %   $ 160,462,500     3 mo. LIBOR +
2.75% per annum
USD-CAD Cross Currency Swap
    CAD61,773,249       7.130 %   $ 53,487,500     3 mo. LIBOR +
2.75% per annum
USD-CAD Cross Currency Swap
    CAD84,271,988       7.070 %   $ 72,937,500     3 mo. LIBOR +
2.75% per annum
 
Tabular Disclosures
 
The table below presents the fair values of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2009 (in thousands).
 
                         
Tabular Disclosure of Fair Values of Derivative Instruments(1)  
    Asset Derivatives
    Liability Derivatives
 
    As of June 30, 2009     As of June 30, 2009  
    Balance Sheet
  Fair
    Balance Sheet
  Fair
 
    Location   Value     Location   Value  
 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133
                       
Foreign Exchange Contracts
  Prepaid Expenses   $ 564     Other Liabilities   $  
Cross Currency Swaps
  Derivatives           Derivatives     10,223  
                         
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133
      $ 564         $ 10,223  
                         
 
 
(1) The fair values of derivative instruments are presented in the above table on a gross basis. Certain of the above derivative instruments are subject to master netting arrangements and qualify for net presentation in the Consolidated Balance Sheet in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts.
 
The tables below present the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ending June 30, 2009 (in thousands).
 


43


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
20.   Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (continued)
 

Tabular Disclosures (continued)
 
                                 
Tabular Disclosure of the Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Year Ending June 30, 2009  
                    Location of
     
                    Gain or (Loss)
  Amount of Gain or
 
                    Recognized
  (Loss) Recognized
 
    Amount of Gain or
              in Income on
  in Income on
 
    (Loss) Recognized
    Location of
        Derivative
  Derivative
 
    in OCI on
    Gain or (Loss)
  Amount of Gain or
    (Ineffective
  (Ineffective
 
    Derivative
    Reclassified
  (Loss) Reclassified
    Portion and Amount
  Portion and Amount
 
Derivatives in SFAS 133
  (Effective
    from Accumulated
  from Accumulated
    Excluded from
  Excluded from
 
Cash Flow Hedging
  Portion), net of
    OCI into Income
  OCI into Income
    Effectiveness
  Effectiveness
 
Relationships
  tax     (Effective Portion)   (Effective Portion)     Testing)   Testing)  
 
Foreign Exchange Contracts
  $ 214     Foreign currency
gain/(loss)
  $     Other income/ (expense)   $  
Cross Currency Swaps
          Interest Expense     (132 )   Other income/ (expense)     45  
      20,660     Corporate
Expenses
    37              
                                 
Total
  $ 20,874         $ (95 )       $ 45  
                                 
 
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
 
The Company has agreements with each of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations
 
The Company’s agreements with its derivative counterparties also contain provisions requiring it to maintain certain minimum financial covenant ratios related to its indebtedness. Failure to comply with the covenant provisions would result in the Company being in default on any derivative instrument obligations covered by the agreement.
 
As of June 30, 2009, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $21.3 million. As of June 30, 2009, the Company has not posted any collateral related to these agreements. If the Company breached any of these provisions it would be required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their termination value of $21.3 million.
 
21.   Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
Comprehensive income (loss) is the change in equity from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources, which includes foreign currency translation and fair value adjustments for cash flow hedges. The following shows the comprehensive income (loss) for the periods stated (in thousands):
 
                         
    June 30,  
    2007     2008     2009  
 
Net income (loss)
  $ (32,203 )   $ 43,364     $ (6,822 )
Foreign currency translation adjustment(1)
    2,940       302       (17,884 )
Fair value adjustments for cash flow hedges, net(2),(3)
    4,426       (7,870 )     (8,152 )
                         
Total comprehensive income (loss)
  $ (24,837 )   $ 35,796     $ (32,858 )
                         

44


 

 
DOLLAR FINANCIAL CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
21.   Comprehensive Income (Loss) (continued)
 
 
(1) The ending balance of the foreign currency translation adjustments included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the balance sheet were gains of $37.6 million, $37.9 million and $20.2 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
 
(2) Net of $2.2 million, $3.8 million and $7.7 million of tax for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
 
(3) Net of $0.8 million, $1.2 million and $2.0 million which were reclassified into earnings for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of related tax, consisted of net unrealized gains on put options designated as cash flow hedges of $37 thousand, $8.7 million of net unrealized losses on cross-currency interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedging transactions and unrealized losses on terminated cross-currency interest rate swaps of $3.5 million at June 30, 2009, compared to net unrealized losses on put options designated as cash flow hedges of $0.2 million and net unrealized losses on cross-currency interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedging transactions of $3.6 million at June 30, 2008.
 
22.   Unaudited Quarterly Operating Results
 
Summarized quarterly financial data for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows (restated for the impact of the adoption of FSP APB 14-1 and SFAS 160 - see Note 2.):
 
                                         
                            Year
 
    Three Months Ended     Ended
 
    September 30     December 31     March 31     June 30     June 30  
    (Unaudited)
 
    (In thousands except per share data)  
 
Fiscal 2009:
                                       
Revenues
  $ 153,076     $ 132,173     $ 118,164     $ 124,440     $ 527,853  
Income before income taxes
    16,513       19,931       14,074       (42,317 )     8,201
Net income
    11,287       9,548       5,713       (33,370 )     (6,822 )
Basic earnings per share
    0.47       0.40       0.24       1.39     (0.28 )
Diluted earnings per share
    0.46       0.40       0.24       1.39     (0.28 )
Fiscal 2008:
                                       
Revenues
  $ 130,856     $ 141,721     $ 149,313     $ 150,294     $ 572,184  
Income before income taxes
    18,605       19,995       20,643       20,136       79,379  
Net income
    10,149       11,059       11,841       10,315       43,364  
Basic earnings per share
    0.42       0.46       0.49       0.43       1.80  
Diluted earnings per share
    0.41       0.45       0.48       0.42       1.77  
23.   Subsequent Events
In connection with the reissuance of the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 to give retrospective application of FSP APB 14-1 and SFAS 160, the Company has updated its procedures related to disclosure of subsequent events through November 20, 2009. The following items are being disclosed in connection with this update.
On October 2, 2009 the Company entered into an agreement to acquire a merchant cash advance business in the United Kingdom. The acquired company primarily provides working capital needs to small retail businesses by providing cash advances against a percentage of future credit card sales. The purchase price for the acquired company, which currently manages a receivable portfolio of approximately $3.0 million, was $4.9 million.
On October 28, 2009 the Company entered into an agreement to acquire Military Financial Services, LLC (“MFS”). MFS is an established business that provides services to active military personnel to obtain auto loans in the United States made by a third-party national bank. The third-party national bank approves the loan application, funds and services the loans and bears the credit risks. The purchase price payable by the Company is approximately $118 million, as adjusted to reflect the working capital of MFS and its subsidiaries as of the closing date as provided in the purchase agreement. The consummation of the acquisition is subject to the consent of the Company’s lenders under its current senior credit facility, the procurement by the Company and its subsidiaries of sufficient financing and the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. The Company expects to complete the acquisition in December 2009, however there is no assurance that the acquisition will be consummated at that time or thereafter. The purchase agreement may be terminated by the Company or the sellers at any time after December 31, 2009 due to a failure to satisfy any of the closing conditions.


45