Attached files
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
OR
o | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Transition period from to
Commission file number 000-32935
ARCADIA RESOURCES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
NEVADA | 88-0331369 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
|
9229 DELEGATES ROW, SUITE 260 | ||
INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA | 46240 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (317) 569-8234
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T during the preceding 12 months
(or for shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
Large Accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ | Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of November 12, 2009, 161,858,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, of the Registrant
were outstanding.
Table of Contents
1
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
ARCADIA RESOURCES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
September 30, | March 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2009 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | | $ | 1,522 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $3,609 and $3,386,
respectively |
14,454 | 15,679 | ||||||
Inventories, net |
575 | 863 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
1,154 | 1,764 | ||||||
Current assets of discontinued operations |
117 | 5,458 | ||||||
Total current assets |
16,300 | 25,286 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
1,822 | 2,308 | ||||||
Goodwill |
17,053 | 17,053 | ||||||
Acquired intangible assets, net |
7,987 | 8,305 | ||||||
Other assets |
626 | 590 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
500 | | ||||||
Assets of discontinued operations |
29 | 5,850 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 44,317 | $ | 59,392 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Lines of credit, current portion |
$ | | $ | 437 | ||||
Accounts payable |
2,101 | 2,765 | ||||||
Accrued expenses: |
||||||||
Compensation and related taxes |
2,904 | 2,986 | ||||||
Interest |
69 | 89 | ||||||
Health insurance |
511 | 545 | ||||||
Other |
1,112 | 917 | ||||||
Payable to affiliated agencies |
852 | 1,284 | ||||||
Long-term obligations, current portion |
3,434 | 596 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations, current portion |
67 | 59 | ||||||
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
590 | 2,037 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
11,640 | 11,715 | ||||||
Lines of credit, less current portion |
6,715 | 10,889 | ||||||
Long-term obligations, less current portion |
24,242 | 26,918 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations, less current portion |
55 | 37 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
42,652 | 49,559 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, none
outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $.001 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized;
161,858,403 shares and 161,249,529 shares issued, respectively |
162 | 161 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
136,470 | 135,920 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(134,967 | ) | (126,248 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
1,665 | 9,833 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 44,317 | $ | 59,392 | ||||
See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
ARCADIA RESOURCES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
Three Month Period Ended | Six Month Period Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Revenues, net |
$ | 25,616 | $ | 26,719 | $ | 52,025 | $ | 53,497 | ||||||||
Cost of revenues |
18,210 | 18,504 | 37,171 | 37,172 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
7,406 | 8,215 | 14,854 | 16,325 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
10,082 | 10,081 | 19,748 | 20,263 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
531 | 613 | 942 | 1,072 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
10,613 | 10,694 | 20,690 | 21,335 | ||||||||||||
Operating loss |
(3,207 | ) | (2,479 | ) | (5,836 | ) | (5,010 | ) | ||||||||
Other expenses (income): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
846 | 1,054 | 1,684 | 2,010 | ||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| | | 248 | ||||||||||||
Other |
(6 | ) | 44 | 30 | 54 | |||||||||||
Total other expenses (income) |
840 | 1,098 | 1,714 | 2,312 | ||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
(4,047 | ) | (3,577 | ) | (7,550 | ) | (7,322 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax expense |
7 | 198 | 100 | 394 | ||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(4,054 | ) | (3,775 | ) | (7,650 | ) | (7,716 | ) | ||||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Income / (loss) from discontinued operations |
(255 | ) | 540 | (1,448 | ) | 1,195 | ||||||||||
Net gain on disposal |
163 | | 379 | | ||||||||||||
(92 | ) | 540 | (1,069 | ) | 1,195 | |||||||||||
NET LOSS |
$ | (4,146 | ) | $ | (3,235 | ) | $ | (8,719 | ) | $ | (6,521 | ) | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
161,201,000 | 133,019,000 | 160,709,000 | 132,357,000 | ||||||||||||
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | ||||
Income from discontinued operations |
| 0.01 | | 0.01 | ||||||||||||
Net loss per share |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | ||||
See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
ARCADIA RESOURCES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
(Unaudited)
Additional | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Paid-In | Accumulated | Stockholders | |||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | Equity | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, April 1, 2009 |
161,249,529 | $ | 161 | $ | 135,920 | $ | (126,248 | ) | $ | 9,833 | ||||||||||
Stock-based compensation
expense |
120,625 | | 551 | | 551 | |||||||||||||||
Cashless exercise of warrants |
488,249 | 1 | (1 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
Net loss for the period |
| | | (8,719 | ) | (8,719 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2009 |
161,858,403 | $ | 162 | $ | 136,470 | $ | (134,967 | ) | $ | 1,665 | ||||||||||
See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
ARCADIA RESOURCES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||
Net loss for the period |
$ | (8,719 | ) | $ | (6,521 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
||||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
1,155 | 1,654 | ||||||
Depreciation of property and equipment |
912 | 2,297 | ||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
405 | 943 | ||||||
Gain on business disposals |
(379 | ) | | |||||
Non-cash interest expense |
1,224 | 1,102 | ||||||
Loss on sale of property and equipment |
| 55 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discounts |
121 | 492 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
551 | 741 | ||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| 248 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
2,440 | (2,952 | ) | |||||
Inventories |
904 | (611 | ) | |||||
Other assets |
821 | 689 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
(1,449 | ) | 908 | |||||
Accrued expenses |
(956 | ) | 781 | |||||
Due to affiliated agencies |
(277 | ) | 166 | |||||
Deferred revenue |
| (19 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(3,247 | ) | (27 | ) | ||||
Investing activities |
||||||||
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
(196 | ) | (429 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from business disposal |
9,320 | 356 | ||||||
Increase in restricted cash |
(500 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from disposals of property and equipment |
| 19 | ||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(96 | ) | (462 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
8,528 | (516 | ) | |||||
Financing activities |
||||||||
Net payments on lines of credit |
(4,610 | ) | (2,956 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from note payable, net of fees |
2,141 | | ||||||
Payments on notes payable and capital lease obligations |
(4,334 | ) | (558 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(6,803 | ) | (3,514 | ) | ||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
(1,522 | ) | (4,057 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
1,522 | 6,351 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | | $ | 2,294 | ||||
Supplementary information: |
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: |
||||||||
Interest |
$ | 322 | $ | 485 | ||||
Income taxes |
33 | 97 | ||||||
Non-cash investing / financing activities: |
||||||||
Capital lease |
70 | | ||||||
Accounts payable converted to notes payable |
750 | | ||||||
Warrants issued in conjunction with line of credit amendment |
| 248 | ||||||
Accrued interest converted to notes payable |
1,224 | |
See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
ARCADIA RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 1 Description of Company and Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Description of Company
Arcadia Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation, together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the
Company), is a national provider of home care, medical staffing, and pharmacy services operating
under the service mark Arcadia HealthCare. In May 2009, the Company disposed of its Home Health
Equipment (HHE), industrial staffing and retail pharmacy software businesses. Subsequent to
these divestitures, the Company operates in three reportable business segments: Home Care/Medical
Staffing Services (Services), Pharmacy and Catalog. The Companys corporate headquarters are
located in Indianapolis, Indiana. The Company conducts its business from approximately 65
facilities located in 20 states. The Company operates pharmacies in Indiana and Minnesota and has
customer service centers in Michigan and Indiana.
Unaudited Interim Financial Information
The accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009, the consolidated statements
of operations for the three-month and six-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the
consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
and the consolidated statement of stockholders equity for the six-month period ended September 30,
2009 are unaudited but include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) that
are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position at
such dates and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods then ended, in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). The consolidated
balance sheet as of March 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial
statements at that date but, in accordance with the rules and regulations of the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), does not include all of the information and notes
required by GAAP for complete financial statements. Operating results for the three-month period
and six-month period ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be
expected for the entire fiscal year. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the financial statements and notes for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 included in the
Companys Form 10-K filed with the SEC on July 14, 2009.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts presented in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current period
presentations including the reflection of discontinued operations separately from continuing
operations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
On July 1, 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification). The
Codification became the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP, superseding
existing accounting pronouncements issued by FASB, American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants (AICPA), and the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF). The Codification eliminates the
previous US GAAP hierarchy and establishes one level of authoritative GAAP. All other literature is
considered non-authoritative. The Codification is effective for interim and annual periods ending
after September 15, 2009. The Company adopted the Codification for the quarter ending
September 30, 2009. There was no impact to the consolidated financial results as this change is
disclosure-only in nature.
In May 2009, the FASB issued guidelines on subsequent event accounting which sets forth: 1) the
period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate
events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial
statements; 2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions
occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and 3) the disclosures that an
entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. These guidelines are effective for interim
and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, and the Company adopted them in the quarter ended
June 30, 2009. There was no impact on the consolidated financial results. We evaluated subsequent
events through the date the financial statements were issued, which was November 13, 2009.
6
Table of Contents
In April 2009, the FASB issued additional requirements regarding interim disclosures about the fair
value of financial instruments which were previously only disclosed on an annual basis. Entities
are now required to disclose the fair value of financial instruments which are not recorded at fair
value in the financial statements in both their interim and annual financial statements. The new
requirements were effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 on a
prospective basis. The Company adopted these requirements in the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The
recorded amounts of the Companys financial instruments at September 30, 2009 approximate fair
value.
On April 1, 2009, the Company adopted the revised FASB guidance regarding business combinations
which was required to be applied to business combinations on a prospective basis. The revised
guidance requires that the acquisition method of accounting be applied to a broader set of business
combinations, amends the definition of a business combination, provides a definition of a business,
requires an acquirer to recognize an acquired business at its fair value at the acquisition date
and requires the assets and liabilities assumed in a business combination to be measured and
recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date (with limited exceptions). There was no
impact upon adoption and the effects of this guidance will depend on the nature and significance of
business combinations occurring after the effective date.
Note 2 Managements Plan
Since fiscal 2008, the Company has been focused on the implementation of a board approved strategic
plan designed to focus on expanding certain core businesses; restructuring the Companys long-term
debt; closing or selling non-strategic businesses and assets; improving operating margins; reducing
selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses; and establishing a more disciplined approach
to cash management. To date, management has made progress in these areas as discussed below.
On March 25, 2009, the Company restructured $24 million of debt with its two largest equity holders
and received an additional $3 million in debt financing as part of the transaction. The debt
maturity was extended through April 1, 2012, and the Company will continue to have the option to
add the accrued interest to the principal balance on a quarterly basis. The debt agreements
include a formula for splitting the cash proceeds upon the sale of assets. (See Note 6
Long-Term Obligations for details).
On July 13, 2009, the Company executed an amendment to its line of credit agreement with Comerica
Bank. The amendment reduced the total availability from $19 million to $14 million; extended the
maturity from October 2009 to August 2011; and increased the interest rate from the prime rate plus
1% to the prime rate plus 2.75%.
In May and June 2009, the Company sold its HHE, industrial staffing and pharmacy software
businesses and received an aggregate of $9,157,000 in cash proceeds at the closings. The Company
used $5,921,000 of the proceeds to pay down debt balances due to JANA, Vicis and AmerisourceBergen
Drug Corporation. Cash proceeds from all divestitures received at the closings, net of fees, less
amounts used to pay down debt were $2,629,000. The transactions included holdback provisions for
an additional $1,475,000 in cash, which is to be released assuming certain criteria are met. The
Company plans to use the cash received from the release of the holdback amounts to further reduce
debt.
As of September 30, 2009, the Company had $3.4 million in cash and line of credit availability.
On November 6, 2009, the Company entered into definitive agreements with certain institutional
investors to sell an aggregate of 15,857,141 shares of common stock and 7,135,713 warrants to
purchase common stock. The Company will raise $10,154,000 in net proceeds from this transaction,
which is expected to be finalized on or before November 17, 2009. Consistent with the terms of the
debt agreement dated September 10, 2009, the Company will use $2,400,000 of the net proceeds to pay
off the outstanding balance. The remaining
$7,754,000 will be used to fund on-going operations (See Note 13 Subsequent Event).
The Company is now focused on improving the performance of its two remaining core business units:
Pharmacy and Services. Subsequent to the various divestitures during fiscal first quarter 2010,
management believes that its increased focus on the remaining businesses will enable it to realize
operational improvements. Within the Pharmacy segment, the Company has significantly expanded
revenue over the last 12 months and began to see improvements in the margins during the quarter
ended September 30, 2009. The success of the Pharmacy business depends heavily on the continued
increase in revenue, continued improvement in margins and the ability to reduce SG&A expenses as a
percentage of revenue. Management believes that the Companys relationships with certain large
payers and home care partners will provide the necessary revenue growth to allow the Company to
leverage its current SG&A structure, improve margins, and achieve profitability in this segment.
The timing and size of the revenue growth will be the primary driver impacting the Pharmacy
businesss financial performance over the next several quarters. However, it is expected that the
Pharmacy segment will not become profitable and will continue to be a net user of cash throughout
fiscal 2010.
7
Table of Contents
Within the Services segment, the Company has seen modest increase in Home Care revenue over the
last 12 months. Management continues to explore cost-effective ways to organically grow the Home
Care revenue. At the same time, the Company has seen a significant reduction in medical staffing
revenue consistent with overall staffing industry trends. The Company has reduced the SG&A in this
segment over the last 12 months and will continue to look for additional cost-saving opportunities.
Management expects these on-going initiatives to improve the Service segment results during the
second half of fiscal 2010 and beyond. At current levels of revenue, it is unlikely that the
profitability of the Services segment will be sufficient to offset the losses and cash usage in the
Pharmacy segment.
Management believes that the additional cash raised with the November 12, 2009 equity financing
will provide the Company with the capital necessary to support operating cash requirements.
Note 3 Discontinued Operations
Industrial Staffing Operations
On May 29, 2009, the Company finalized the sale of substantially all of the assets of its
industrial and non-medical staffing business for cash proceeds of $250,000, which were paid in five
equal installments through September 2009. Additionally, the Company will receive 50% of the
future earnings of the business until the total payments equal $1,600,000. Such payments, if any,
will be recorded as additional gains when earned. The Company retained all accounts receivable for
services provided prior to May 29, 2009.
HHE Operations
On January 5, 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Braden Partners, L.P.
to sell the assets of its HHE business in San Fernando, California. Total proceeds were originally
estimated to be $503,000, less fees of $24,000. This amount included $126,000 that was to be held
back by the buyer to cover certain contingent obligations of the Company. During the three-month
period ended September 30, 2009, the Company and the buyer resolved certain claims and the holdback
amount of $126,000 was forfeited by the Company. The Company retained all accounts receivables for
services provided prior to January 2009.
On May 18, 2009, the Company completed the sale of its ownership interest in Lovell Medical Supply,
Inc., Beacon Respiratory Services of Georgia, Inc., and Trinity Healthcare of Winston-Salem, Inc.
to Aerocare Holdings, Inc. for total proceeds of $4,750,000, less fees of $150,000. At the time of
closing, $475,000 of the purchase price was held by the buyer to cover the Companys contingent
obligations. In September 2009, the buyer released $160,000 of this amount, which was recognized
as an additional gain on the sale. The entities sold represented the Southeast region of the
Companys HHE business.
On May 19, 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Braden Partners, L.P. to sell the assets of its Midwest region of the Companys HHE business. Total proceeds were
$4,000,000, less fees of $150,000. $1,000,000 of the purchase price is being held by the buyer to
cover the Companys contingent obligations. The Company retained all accounts receivable for
services provided prior to May 2009.
As of May 2009, the Company had sold all of its HHE operations.
Retail Pharmacy Software Business
On June 11, 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with a leading pharmacy
management company to sell substantially all of the assets of JASCORP, LLC (JASCORP) for proceeds
of $2,200,000, less estimated fees of $100,000. $220,000 of the purchase price is being held back
by the buyer until December 2011 in order to cover the Companys contingent obligations. JASCORP
operated the retail pharmacy software business that the Company acquired in September 2007. As
part of the divestiture, the Company entered into a License and Services Agreement with the buyer
which provides the Company the right to continue to use the software for internal purposes.
8
Table of Contents
The assets and liabilities associated with these discontinued business operations have been
classified as assets and liabilities of discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets. The results of the above are reported in discontinued operations in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations, and the prior period consolidated statement of
operations have been recast to conform to this presentation. The segment results in Note 12 also
reflect the reclassification of the discontinued operations. The discontinued operations do not
reflect the costs of certain services provided to these operations by the Company. Such costs,
which were not allocated by the Company to the various operations, included internal employee costs
associated with administrative functions, including accounting, information technology, human
resources, compliance and contracting as well as external costs for legal fees, insurance, audit
fees, payroll processing, and various public-company expenses. The Company uses a centralized
approach to cash management and financing of its operations, and, accordingly, debt and the related
interest expense were also not allocated specifically to these operations. The consolidated
statements of cash flows do not separately report the cash flows of the discontinued operations.
The components of the assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations are presented below (in
thousands):
September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Services - | ||||||||||||||||
Industrial | Pharmacy - | |||||||||||||||
Staffing | HHE | Software | Total | |||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $516 |
$ | | $ | | $ | 9 | $ | 9 | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
| 30 | 78 | 108 | ||||||||||||
Total current assets of discontinued operations |
| 30 | 87 | 117 | ||||||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
| 29 | | 29 | ||||||||||||
Total assets of discontinued operations |
$ | | $ | 59 | $ | 87 | $ | 146 | ||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | | $ | 163 | $ | 33 | 196 | |||||||||
Accrued compensation and related taxes |
| 84 | 129 | 213 | ||||||||||||
Accrued other |
59 | 122 | | 181 | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities of discontinued operations |
$ | 59 | $ | 369 | $ | 162 | $ | 590 | ||||||||
9
Table of Contents
March 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Services - | ||||||||||||||||
Industrial | Pharmacy - | |||||||||||||||
Staffing | HHE | Software | Total | |||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $968 |
$ | 972 | $ | 3,199 | $ | 138 | $ | 4,309 | ||||||||
Inventory, net |
| 829 | 20 | 849 | ||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
35 | 175 | 90 | 300 | ||||||||||||
Total current assets of discontinued operations |
1,007 | 4,203 | 248 | 5,458 | ||||||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
17 | 1,716 | 132 | 1,865 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill |
| 507 | 923 | 1,430 | ||||||||||||
Acquired intangibles assets, net |
| 1,822 | 733 | 2,555 | ||||||||||||
Total non-current assets of discontinued operations |
17 | 4,045 | 1,788 | 5,850 | ||||||||||||
Total assets of discontinued operations |
$ | 1,024 | $ | 8,248 | $ | 2,036 | $ | 11,308 | ||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 4 | $ | 986 | $ | 74 | $ | 1,064 | ||||||||
Accrued compensation and related taxes |
228 | 350 | 93 | 671 | ||||||||||||
Accrued other |
84 | 64 | 60 | 208 | ||||||||||||
Long-term obligations, current portion |
| 94 | | 94 | ||||||||||||
Total current liabilities of discontinued operations |
$ | 316 | $ | 1,494 | $ | 227 | $ | 2,037 | ||||||||
The components of the earnings/(loss) from discontinued operations are presented below (in
thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Revenues, net: |
||||||||||||||||
Services Industrial Staffing |
$ | | $ | 4,821 | $ | 1,223 | $ | 10,039 | ||||||||
Home Health Equipment |
| 4,855 | 1,423 | 9,687 | ||||||||||||
Pharmacy Software |
| 528 | 348 | 1,085 | ||||||||||||
$ | | 10,204 | $ | 2,994 | 20,811 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Services Industrial Staffing |
$ | (8 | ) | $ | 425 | $ | (44 | ) | $ | 837 | ||||||
Home Health Equipment |
(189 | ) | 124 | (1,230 | ) | 315 | ||||||||||
Pharmacy Software |
(58 | ) | (9 | ) | (174 | ) | 43 | |||||||||
$ | (255 | ) | $ | 540 | $ | (1,448 | ) | $ | 1,195 | |||||||
Gain / (loss) on disposal: |
||||||||||||||||
Services Industrial Staffing |
$ | 3 | $ | | $ | 129 | $ | | ||||||||
Home Health Equipment |
160 | | 280 | | ||||||||||||
Pharmacy Software |
| | (30 | ) | | |||||||||||
$ | 163 | $ | | $ | 379 | $ | | |||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Services Industrial Staffing |
$ | (5 | ) | $ | 425 | $ | 85 | $ | 837 | |||||||
Home Health Equipment |
(29 | ) | 124 | (950 | ) | 315 | ||||||||||
Pharmacy Software |
(58 | ) | (9 | ) | (204 | ) | 43 | |||||||||
$ | (92 | ) | $ | 540 | $ | (1,069 | ) | $ | 1,195 | |||||||
10
Table of Contents
Note 4 Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets
Goodwill by segment as of September 30 and March 31, 2009 was as follows (in thousands):
Services | Pharmacy | Catalog | Total | |||||||||||||
Balance |
$ | 14,553 | $ | 2,500 | $ | | $ | 17,053 | ||||||||
The Companys policy is to perform its annual impairment analysis during the fourth quarter of the
fiscal year end. If actual performance in any reporting unit falls short of expected results, a
non-cash impairment charge may be required.
For tax purposes, goodwill of approximately $24.0 million is amortizable over 15 years. The
difference between the book and tax balance of goodwill is due to certain impairment charges
incurred for book purposes in previous periods.
Acquired intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):
September 30, 2009 | March 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Accumulated | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||
Cost | Amortization | Cost | Amortization | |||||||||||||
Trade name |
$ | 6,664 | $ | 765 | $ | 6,664 | $ | 682 | ||||||||
Customer relationships |
4,720 | 2,632 | 4,720 | 2,397 | ||||||||||||
11,384 | $ | 3,397 | 11,384 | $ | 3,079 | |||||||||||
Less accumulated amortization |
(3,397 | ) | (3,079 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net acquired intangible assets |
$ | 7,987 | $ | 8,305 | ||||||||||||
Amortization expense for acquired intangible assets included in continuing operations was $158,000
and $306,000 for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and
$318,000 and $607,000 for the six-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The estimated amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets in existence as of
September 30, 2009 was as follows (in thousands):
Remainder of fiscal 2010 |
$ | 316 | ||
Fiscal 2011 |
571 | |||
Fiscal 2012 |
518 | |||
Fiscal 2013 |
476 | |||
Fiscal 2014 |
382 | |||
Thereafter |
5,724 | |||
Total |
$ | 7,987 | ||
11
Table of Contents
Note 5 Lines of Credit
The following table summarizes the lines of credit for the Company (in thousands):
At September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Maximum | ||||||||||||||||||||
Available | March 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
Lending Institution | Maturity date | Borrowing | Balance | 2009 | Interest rate | |||||||||||||||
Comerica Bank |
August 1, 2011 | $ | 10,157 | $ | 6,715 | $ | 9,126 | Prime plus 2.75 | % | |||||||||||
AmerisourceBergen
Drug Corporation |
September 30, 2010 | | | 2,200 | 10 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total lines of
credit obligations |
$ | 10,157 | 6,715 | 11,326 | ||||||||||||||||
Less current portion |
| (437 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Long-term portion |
$ | 6,715 | $ | 10,889 | ||||||||||||||||
Comerica Bank
Arcadia Services, Inc. (ASI), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and three of ASIs
wholly-owned subsidiaries have an outstanding line of credit agreement with Comerica Bank.
Advances under the line of credit agreement cannot exceed the revolving credit commitment amount or
the aggregate principal amount of indebtedness permitted under the advance formula amount at any
one time. On July 13, 2009, ASI executed an amendment to this line of credit agreement, which
reduced the total available advances from $19 million to $14 million. The advance formula base is
85% of the eligible accounts receivable, plus the lesser of 85% of eligible unbilled accounts or
$3,000,000. The line of credit agreement contains a subjective acceleration clause and requires the
Company to maintain a lockbox. However, the Company has the ability to control the funds in the deposit account and to determine the amount used to pay
down the line of credit balance. As such, the line of credit is not automatically classified as a
current obligation in the consolidated balance sheets. Arcadia Services, Inc. agreed to various
financial covenant ratios (as described below), to have any person who acquires Arcadia Services,
Inc.s capital stock to pledge such stock to Comerica Bank, and to customary negative covenants.
The amendment to the line of credit agreement also requires the Company to maintain a deposit
account with a minimum balance of $500,000, and this amount is classified as restricted cash on the
Companys balance sheet. If an event of default occurs, Comerica Bank may, at its option,
accelerate the maturity of the debt and exercise its right to foreclose on the issued and
outstanding capital stock of Arcadia Services, Inc. and on all of the assets of Arcadia Services,
Inc. and its subsidiaries. On September 30, 2009, the interest rate on this line of credit
agreement was the banks prime rate plus 2.75% (6.0%), and the availability under the line was
$3,442,000.
RKDA, Inc. (RKDA), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and the holding company of Arcadia
Services, Inc. and Arcadia Products, Inc., granted Comerica Bank a first priority security interest
in all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Arcadia Services, Inc. Arcadia Services,
Inc. granted Comerica Bank a first priority security interest in all of its assets. The
subsidiaries of Arcadia Services, Inc. granted the bank security interests in all of their assets.
RDKA is restricted from paying dividends to the Company. RKDA executed a guaranty to Comerica Bank
for all indebtedness of Arcadia Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Any such default and
resulting foreclosure would have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition. As
of September 30, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all financial covenants.
The July 2009 amendment to the line of credit agreement includes the following financial covenants:
tangible effective net worth of $2 million as of September 30, 2009 and gradually increasing on a
quarterly basis to $2.8 million by September 2011; minimum quarterly net income of $400,000; and,
minimum subordination of indebtedness to Arcadia Resources, Inc. of $15.5 million. As of September
30, 2009, the Company was in compliance with the loan covenants.
12
Table of Contents
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation
In connection with the acquisition of PrairieStone in February 2007, PrairieStone entered into a
line of credit agreement with AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation (ABDC), which previously
maintained an ownership interest in PrairieStone. The line of credit was secured by a security
interest in all of the assets of PrairieStone and SSAC, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company, and is guaranteed by the Company.
On June 10, 2009, the Company entered into an amendment to the line of credit agreement, which
converted the line of credit to a term loan. The amendment included terms whereby if the Company
paid down the remaining balance outstanding on the line of credit, ABDC would defer the payment of
certain inventory purchases up to $750,000 until April 1, 2010, and the deferred balance would
accrue interest at 8.0%. Additionally, ABDC agreed to negotiate in good faith the extension of an
existing Prime Vendor Agreement relating to the Pharmacy segment which expires in September 2010
and a new credit agreement. On June 11, 2009 and simultaneous with the divestiture of JASCORP, the
Company paid ABDC a total of $2,125,000 in order to pay off the line of credit balance. During
June 2009, the Company deferred $750,000 in inventory purchasing payments. To date, the Company
and ABDC have not yet negotiated the new credit agreement relating to the $750,000 or the Prime
Vendor Agreement. The $750,000 is included in current long-term obligation as of September 30,
2009 on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
13
Table of Contents
Note 6 Long-Term Obligations
Long-term obligations consist of the following (in thousands):
September 30, | March 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2009 | |||||||
Note payable to JANA in the amount of
$18.0 million, dated March 25, 2009 bearing
an effective interest rate of 10% with
unpaid accrued interest and principal due in
full on April 1, 2012. Cash interest that
would otherwise be payable on such quarterly
interest payment dates may be added to the
principal balance of the note payable at the
Companys option. The note payable is
unsecured. |
$ | 16,997 | $ | 18,035 | ||||
Note payable to Vicis Capital Master Fund
(Vicis) in the amount of $7.8 million,
dated March 25, 2009 bearing an effective
interest rate of 10% with unpaid accrued
interest and principal due in full on April
1, 2012. Cash interest that would otherwise
be payable on such quarterly interest
payment dates may be added to the principal
balance of the note payable at the Companys
option. The note payable is unsecured. |
6,193 | 7,882 | ||||||
Notes payable in the aggregate amount of
$2.4 million, dated September 10, 2009 with
principal due in full on April 1, 2010. The
notes payable are unsecured. The amounts
reported are net of unamortized original
issue discounts of $90,000 on September 30,
2009. The notes include a mandatory
repayment provision whereby if the Company
raises in excess of $5 million in a debt or
equity transaction, the notes would be paid
in full. |
2,310 | | ||||||
Note payable to LSP Partners, LP
(LSP) in the amount of $1.0 million, dated
March 25, 2009 bearing an effective interest
rate of 10% with unpaid accrued interest and
principal due in full on April 1, 2012. Cash
interest that would otherwise be payable on
such quarterly interest payment dates may be
added to the principal balance of the note
payable at the Companys option. The note
payable is unsecured. |
1,052 | 1,000 | ||||||
Payable due to AmerisourceBergen Drug
Corporation consistent with the terms of an
amendment to a line of credit agreement
dated June 10, 2009 bearing an effective
interest rate of 8.0% with unpaid accrued
interest and principal due in full on April
1, 2010. The debt is secured by the assets
of the Pharmacy segment. |
750 | | ||||||
Post-closing risk share obligation
relating to the PrairieStone acquisition due
to Lunds, bearing an effective interest rate
of 10%, maturing on February 17, 2010 with
monthly principal payments of $37,000. The
balance is unsecured. |
185 | 408 | ||||||
Other |
189 | 189 | ||||||
Total long-term obligations |
27,676 | 27,514 | ||||||
Less current portion of long-term obligations |
(3,434 | ) | (596 | ) | ||||
Long-term obligations, less current portion |
$ | 24,242 | $ | 26,918 | ||||
On March 25, 2009, the Company entered into a Master Exchange Agreement with JANA (related entity),
Vicis (related entity) and LSP. Pursuant to the agreement, Vicis purchased $2,000,000 of the
principal balance of promissory note held by JANA. Additionally, JANA and LSP advanced the Company
$2,000,000 and $1,000,000 of cash, respectively. JANA and Vicis then exchanged their previously
outstanding promissory notes for new notes with terms as described above. The new promissory notes
due to JANA, Vicis, and LSP include covenants relating to, among other items, limitations of
additional indebtedness, issuance of new equity securities and the application of proceeds from
future asset sales. Specifically, the notes provide that the first $2,000,000 in proceeds would be
retained by the Company. Additional proceeds are then paid to JANA, Vicis and LSP as provided in
the promissory notes. After these promissory note prepayments are made, proceeds up to $20,000,000
are split 50% to the Company and 50% to be paid pro-rata to these three lenders. Thereafter,
proceeds are split 25% to the Company and 75% to the lenders. As of September 30, 2009, the
Company owes these lenders $1,200,000 before additional proceeds are split between the Company and
the lenders.
14
Table of Contents
As of September 30, 2009 future maturities of long-term obligations are as follows (in thousands):
Remainder of fiscal 2010 |
$ | 284 | ||
Fiscal 2011 |
3,240 | |||
Fiscal 2012 |
| |||
Fiscal 2013 |
24,242 | |||
27,766 | ||||
Less unamortized debt discount |
(90 | ) | ||
Total |
$ | 27,676 | ||
The weighted average interest rate of outstanding long-term obligations as of September 30, 2009
and March 31, 2009 and 2008 was 10.0%.
Note 7 Stockholders Equity
General
On October 14, 2009, the Companys shareholders approved an amendment to the Companys Articles of
Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the Companys common stock to
300,000,000, $0.001 par value per share from 200,000,000, $0.001 par value per share.
Warrants
The following represents warrants outstanding:
September 30, | March 31, | |||||||||||||||
Exercise Price | Granted | Expiration | 2009 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
$ | 0.001 | September 2005 | September 2010 | | 444,444 | |||||||||||
$ | 0.41 | April 2009 | April 2014 | 52,800 | | |||||||||||
$ | 0.50 | May 2004 | May 2011 | 2,299,696 | 2,436,307 | |||||||||||
$ | 0.50 | May 2004 | March 2014 | 1,104,729 | 1,104,729 | |||||||||||
$ | 0.75 | June 2008 | June 2015 | 490,000 | 490,000 | |||||||||||
$ | 2.25 | September 2005 | May 2014 | 44,444 | 44,444 | |||||||||||
3,991,669 | 4,519,924 | |||||||||||||||
The outstanding warrants have no voting rights and provide the holder with the right to convert one
warrant for one share of the Companys common stock at the stated exercise price. The majority of
the outstanding warrants have a cashless exercise feature.
During the six-month period ended September 30, 2009, 581,055 warrants were exercised on a cashless
basis resulting in the issuance of 510,738 shares of common stock. Additionally, the Company
accounted for 22,489 shares of common stock forfeited to the Company as part of the cashless
exercise of 8,545,833 certain warrants in March 2009. No warrants were exercised during the
six-month period ended September 30, 2008.
15
Table of Contents
Note 8 Stock-Based Compensation
On August 18, 2006, the Board of Directors unanimously approved the Arcadia Resources, Inc. 2006
Equity Incentive Plan (the 2006 Plan), which was subsequently approved by the stockholders on
September 26, 2006. The 2006 Plan provides for grants of incentive stock options, non-qualified
stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted shares (collectively Awards). The 2006
Plan will terminate and no more Awards will be granted after August 2, 2016, unless terminated by
the Board of Directors sooner. The termination of the 2006 Plan will not affect previously granted
Awards. All non-employee directors, executive officers and employees of the Company and its
subsidiaries are eligible to receive Awards under the 2006 Plan. As of September 30, 2009,
approximately 200,000 shares were available for grant under the 2006 Plan.
On January 27, 2009, the Board of Directors approved and adopted the Second Amendment (the
Amendment) to the 2006 Plan, and the Amendment was approved by the stockholders on October 14,
2009. The Amendment increased the number of shares available to be issued under the Plan to 5% of
the Companys authorized shares of common stock or 15 million shares.
Stock Options
Prior to the adoption of the 2006 Plan, stock options were granted to certain members of management
and the Board of Directors. The terms of these options varied depending on the nature and timing
of the grant. The maximum contractual term for the options granted to date is seven years.
The fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of the grant using a
Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. The
Company estimated the volatility of its common stock by using historical stock price volatility.
The Company based the risk-free interest rate that it uses in the option pricing model on U.S.
Treasury constant maturity issues having remaining terms similar to the expected terms of the
options. The Company does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future and
therefore used an expected dividend yield of zero in the option pricing model. The expected life of
employee stock options represents the calculation using the simplified method for plain vanilla
options applied consistently to all plain vanilla options. Due to a lack of adequate historical
experience to provide a reasonable estimate, the Company will continue to use the simplified method
until it has the historical data necessary to provide a reasonable estimate of expected life. For
the expected option life, the Company has plain-vanilla stock options, and therefore uses a
simple average of the vesting period and the contractual term for options. All share-based payment
awards are amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods, which is
generally the vesting period.
Following are the specific valuation assumptions used for each respective period:
Three-Month Period Ended | Six-Month Period Ended | |||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||
Weighted-average | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Expected volatility |
85 | % | N/A | 78 | % | 74 | % | |||||||
Expected dividend yields |
0 | % | N/A | 0 | % | 0 | % | |||||||
Expected terms (in years) |
4 | N/A | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
2.59 | % | N/A | 2.64 | % | 3.23 | % |
16
Table of Contents
Stock option activity for the six-month period ended September 30, 2009 is summarized below:
Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted- | Average | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Average | Remaining | Intrinsic | ||||||||||||||
Exercise | Contractual | Value | ||||||||||||||
Options | Shares | Price | Term (Years) | (thousands) | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at April 1, 2009 |
3,771,225 | $ | 0.76 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
35,000 | 0.67 | ||||||||||||||
Forfeited or expired |
(332,250 | ) | 1.12 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2009 |
3,473,975 | $ | 0.72 | 5.1 | $ | 1,668 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at September 30, 2009 |
3,129,400 | $ | 0.75 | 4.9 | $ | 1,435 | ||||||||||
In fiscal 2009, the Board determined that certain members of executive management would be granted
a number of options which would vest over three years. On April 3, 2008, the Board authorized the
issuance of one-third of these total option grants for executive management (such portion which
vested quarterly over fiscal 2009) and determined that the remaining two-thirds were to be issued
as soon as the Company has option shares available to do so. Following approval of the Amendment
of the Plan as describe above, on January 27, 2009, the Board of Directors granted the remaining
two-thirds of these options to the executives (an aggregate of 2,253,334 options), such options (i)
having an exercise price of $0.72 per share (the closing share price on April 2, 2008), (ii)
vesting in equal installments on March 31, 2010 and 2011, and (iii) expiring on January 26, 2016.
At the annual meeting on October 14, 2009, the shareholders approved the Amendment to the Plan.
Therefore, the 2,253,334 options were granted in third quarter of fiscal 2010 and are not included
in the above table, which presents activity through September 30, 2009.
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at September 30, 2009:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||
Remaining | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||
Number | Contractual | Exercise | Number | Exercise | ||||||||||||||||
Range of Exercise Prices | Outstanding | Life | Price | Exercisable | Price | |||||||||||||||
$0.18 $0.25 |
516,000 | 4.1 | $ | 0.25 | 508,000 | $ | 0.25 | |||||||||||||
$0.26 $1.00 |
2,389,395 | 4.8 | $ | 0.61 | 2,052,820 | $ | 0.64 | |||||||||||||
$1.01 $1.50 |
450,967 | 3.3 | $ | 1.34 | 450,967 | $ | 1.34 | |||||||||||||
$1.51 $2.25 |
43,000 | 3.6 | $ | 2.22 | 43,000 | $ | 2.22 | |||||||||||||
$2.92 |
74,613 | 3.8 | $ | 2.92 | 74,613 | $ | 2.92 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at September
30, 2009 |
3,473,975 | $ | 0.72 | 3,129,400 | $ | 0.75 | ||||||||||||||
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the six-month period ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $0.43 and $0.85, respectively.
No stock options were exercised during either the six-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and
2008.
The Company recognized $178,000 and $222,000 in stock-based compensation expense from all
operations relating to stock options during the three-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively, and $363,000 and $428,000 during the six-month periods ended September 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively.
As of September 30, 2009, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to stock
options was $$873,000, which is expected to be expensed through 2011.
17
Table of Contents
Restricted Stock
Restricted stock is measured at fair value on the date of the grant, based on the number of shares
granted and the quoted price of the Companys common stock. The value is recognized as compensation
expense ratably over the corresponding employees specified service period. Restricted stock vests
upon the employees fulfillment of specified performance and service-based conditions.
The following table summarizes the activity for restricted stock awards during the three-month
period ended September 30, 2009:
Weighted- | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Grant Date | ||||||||
Fair Value | ||||||||
Shares | per Share | |||||||
Unvested at April 1, 2009 |
476,092 | $ | 1.45 | |||||
Vested |
(120,625 | ) | 1.40 | |||||
Forfeited |
(10,000 | ) | 1.48 | |||||
Unvested at September 30, 2009 |
345,467 | $ | 1.42 | |||||
During the three-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company recognized $88,000
and $117,000, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense from all operations related to
restricted stock. During the six-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company
recognized $187,000 and $245,000, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense from all
operations related to restricted stock.
During the six-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the total fair value of restricted
stock vested was $422,000 and $318,000, respectively.
As of September 30, 2009, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested
restricted stock awards was $481,000, which is expected to be expensed over a weighted-average
period of 1.62 years.
Note 9 Contingencies
As a health care provider, the Company is subject to extensive federal and state government
regulation, including numerous laws directed at preventing fraud and abuse and laws regulating
reimbursement under various government programs. The marketing, billing, documenting and other
practices of health care companies are all subject to government scrutiny. To ensure compliance
with Medicare and other regulations, audits may be conducted, with requests for patient records and
other documents to support claims submitted for payment of services rendered to customers,
beneficiaries of the government programs. Violations of federal and state regulations can result in
severe criminal, civil and administrative penalties and sanctions, including disqualification from
Medicare and other reimbursement programs.
The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course
of business. The Company does not believe that the resolution of such actions will materially
affect the Companys business.
Note 10 Income Taxes
The Company incurred state and local tax expense of $7,000 and $198,000 during the three-month
periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $100,000 and $394,000 during the
six-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
A valuation allowance is required to be established when it is more likely than not that all or a
portion of deferred income tax assets will not be realized. A review of all available positive and
negative evidence needs to be considered, including a companys performance, the market environment
in which the company operates, the length of carryback and carryforward periods, and expectation of
future profits. Forming a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed is difficult when
there is negative evidence such as the cumulative losses in recent years. Therefore, cumulative
losses weigh heavily in the overall assessment. The Company will provide a full valuation allowance
on future tax benefits until it can sustain a level of profitability that demonstrates its ability
to utilize the assets, or other significant positive evidence arises that suggests the Companys
ability to utilize such assets.
18
Table of Contents
Note 11 Related Party Transactions
On September 30, 2009, the Company had an outstanding balance of $17.0 million related to a note
payable with JANA dated March 25, 2009. JANA held greater than 15% of the outstanding shares of
the Companys common stock on September 30, 2009. The Company incurred interest expense relating to
the debt due to JANA in the amounts of $418,000 and $423,000 during the three-month periods ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $862,000 and $831,000 during the six-month periods
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. See Note 6 Long-term Obligations for
additional information pertaining to this debt instrument.
On September 30, 2009, the Company had an outstanding balance of $6.2 million related to a note
payable with Vicis Capital Master Fund dated March 25, 2009. Vicis held greater than 15% of the
outstanding shares of the Companys common stock on September 30, 2009. The Company incurred
interest expense, relating to debt due to Vicis in the amounts of $152,000 and $133,000 during the
three-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $310,000 and $265,000
during the six-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. See Note 6
Long-term Obligations for additional information pertaining to this debt instrument.
One of the members of the Board of Directors of the Company, who resigned effective November 4,
2009, has minority ownership interests in each of Lunds, Inc. and LFHI Rx, LLC and serves as the
Chairman and CEO of Lunds, Inc. These two entities held an ownership interest in PrairieStone prior
to its acquisition by the Company and held approximately 2% of the outstanding shares of the
Companys common stock on September 30, 2009. Immediately prior to Companys acquisition of
PrairieStone, PrairieStone closed on the sale of the assets of fifteen retail pharmacies located
within grocery stores owned and operated by Lunds, Inc. and Byerlys, Inc. to Lunds, Inc., which
transaction included execution of a five-year Management Services Agreement and a five-year
Licensed Services Agreement between Lunds, Inc. and PrairieStone. Under the terms of the Management
Services Agreement, PrairieStone provided such services that were appropriate for the day-to-day
management of the pharmacies. In conjunction with these two agreements, the Company recognized
$25,000 and $62,000 in revenue during the three-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and $52,000 and $126,000 during the six-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The Asset Purchase Agreement with Lunds also included a post-closing
risk-share clause whereby PrairieStone was to pay Lunds 50% of the first two years losses, if
any, up to a cumulative total loss of $914,000. $457,000 was accrued during the fiscal 2007. In
March 2009, the Company entered into an Override Agreement with Lunds whereby the Company agreed to
pay the post-closing risk-share balance of $457,000 with an initial payment of $50,000 and then
eleven monthly equal installments plus interest through February 2010. As of September 30, 2009,
the remaining principal balance of $185,000 is included in the current portion of long-term
obligations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Override Agreement also
terminated the Management Services Agreement and provided for the granting of 100,000 shares of the
Companys common stock to Lunds.
The Companys Chief Operating Officer has a beneficial ownership interest in an affiliated agency
and thereby has an interest in the affiliates transactions with the Company, including the
payments of commissions to the affiliate based on a specified percentage of gross margin. The
affiliate is responsible to pay its selling, general and administrative expenses. Commissions
totaled $200,000 and $348,000 for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and $411,000 and $722,000 for the six-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. In addition, the Company has an agreement with this affiliate, which is
terminable under certain circumstances, to purchase the business under certain events, but in no
event later than 2011.
19
Table of Contents
Note 12 Segment Information
The Company reports net revenue from continuing operations and operating income/(loss) from
continuing operations by reportable segment. Reportable segments are components of the Company for
which separate financial information is available that is evaluated on a regular basis by the chief
operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.
The Companys continuing operations include three segments: Services, Pharmacy and Catalog.
Segments include operations engaged in similar lines of business and in some cases, may utilize
common back office support services. Prior period segment information has been reclassified in
order to conform to the current year presentation.
The Services segment is a national provider of home care services, including skilled and personal
care, and medical staffing services (per diem and travel nursing) to numerous types of acute care
and sub-acute care medical facilities. In May 2009, the Company sold its industrial staffing
business, which was previously included in the Services segment and is included in discontinued
operations as of September 30, 2009.
The Pharmacy segment includes the Companys proprietary medication management system called
DailyMed. The Companys pharmacies in Indiana and Minnesota dispense patients prescriptions,
over-the-counter medications and vitamins, and organize them into pre-sorted packets clearly marked
with the date and time they should be taken. The DailyMed approach is designed to improve the
safety and efficacy of the medications being dispensed. In June 2009, the Company sold its
pharmacy dispensing and billing software business, which was previously included in the Pharmacy
segment and is included in discontinued operations as of September 30, 2009.
The Catalog segment operates a home-health oriented mail-order catalog and related website. In May
2009, the Company sold its HHE business, which sold respiratory and medical equipment throughout
the United States. The Catalog and HHE businesses were previously combined as one segment. The
HHE business is included in discontinued operations as of September 30, 2009.
20
Table of Contents
Management evaluates performance based on profit or loss from operations, excluding corporate,
general and administrative expenses, as follows (in thousands):
Three Month Period Ended | Six Month Period Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Revenue, net: |
||||||||||||||||
Services |
$ | 21,709 | $ | 24,824 | $ | 44,389 | $ | 49,831 | ||||||||
Pharmacy |
3,409 | 1,214 | 6,627 | 2,319 | ||||||||||||
Catalog |
498 | 681 | 1,009 | 1,347 | ||||||||||||
Total revenue |
25,616 | 26,719 | 52,025 | 53,497 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
Services |
$ | 1,036 | $ | 1,103 | $ | 2,243 | $ | 2,269 | ||||||||
Pharmacy |
(1,564 | ) | (1,024 | ) | (2,877 | ) | (1,875 | ) | ||||||||
Catalog |
7 | (9 | ) | (31 | ) | 1 | ||||||||||
Unallocated corporate overhead |
(2,686 | ) | (2,549 | ) | (5,171 | ) | (5,405 | ) | ||||||||
Total operating income (loss) |
(3,207 | ) | (2,479 | ) | (5,836 | ) | (5,010 | ) | ||||||||
Other expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
846 | 1,054 | 1,684 | 2,010 | ||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| | | 248 | ||||||||||||
Other |
(6 | ) | 44 | 30 | 54 | |||||||||||
Net loss before income tax
expense |
(4,047 | ) | (3,577 | ) | (7,550 | ) | (7,322 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax expense |
7 | 198 | 100 | 394 | ||||||||||||
Net loss from continuing
operations |
$ | (4,054 | ) | $ | (3,775 | ) | $ | (7,650 | ) | $ | (7,716 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization: |
||||||||||||||||
Services |
$ | 191 | $ | 277 | $ | 385 | $ | 559 | ||||||||
Pharmacy |
206 | 239 | 293 | 370 | ||||||||||||
Catalog |
| 13 | | 26 | ||||||||||||
Corporate |
134 | 84 | 264 | 117 | ||||||||||||
Total depreciation and
amortization |
$ | 531 | $ | 613 | $ | 942 | $ | 1,072 | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Capital expenditures: |
||||||||
Services |
$ | 26 | $ | 66 | ||||
Pharmacy |
61 | 82 | ||||||
Corporate |
7 | 115 | ||||||
Discontinued operations |
2 | 199 | ||||||
Total capital expenditures |
$ | 96 | $ | 462 | ||||
September 30, 2009 | March 31, 2009 | |||||||
Assets: |
||||||||
Services |
$ | 37,526 | $ | 39,183 | ||||
Pharmacy |
5,024 | 5,514 | ||||||
Catalog |
189 | 221 | ||||||
Unallocated corporate assets |
1,432 | 3,166 | ||||||
Assets of discontinued operations |
146 | 11,308 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 44,317 | $ | 59,392 | ||||
21
Table of Contents
Note 13 Subsequent Event
On November 6, 2009, the Company entered into definitive agreements with certain institutional
investors to sell 15,857,141 units for $0.70 per unit. Each unit consists of one share of common
stock and a warrant to purchase 0.45 shares of common stock. The Company will issue 15,857,141
shares of common stock and 7,135,713 warrants to purchase common stock. The transaction is
expected to be finalized on or before November 17, 2009.
The warrants, which have an exercise price of $0.95, cannot be exercised until six months and one
day after the original issuance date and expire five years after they first become exercisable.
Expenses associated with the transaction, which include a 6.5% placement agent fee, are expected to
be approximately $946,000 resulting in anticipated net proceeds of $10,154,000. Consistent with
the terms of the debt agreement entered into on September 10, 2009, the Company will use $2,400,000
of the net proceeds to pay off certain outstanding debt.
22
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations
The following discussion and analysis provides information we believe is relevant to an assessment
and understanding of our results of operations and financial condition for the three and six month
periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the
condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included herein, the consolidated
financial statements and notes and the related Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31,
2009 and Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 filed with the SEC on July 14, 2009 and
August 13, 2009, respectively, which are incorporated herein by this reference.
Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
The MD&A should be read in conjunction with the other sections of this report on Form 10-Q,
including the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto beginning on page 2 of this
Report. Historical results set forth in the financial statements beginning on page 2 and this
section should not be taken as indicative of our future operations.
We caution you that statements contained in this report (including our documents incorporated
herein by reference) include forward-looking statements. The Company claims all safe harbor and
other legal protections provided to it by law for all of its forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, assumptions, uncertainties and other
factors about our Company, which could cause actual financial or operating results, performances or
achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements not to occur or be realized.
Such forward-looking statements generally are based on our reasonable estimates of future results,
performances or achievements, predicated upon current conditions and the most recent results of the
companies involved and their respective industries. Forward-looking statements are also based on
economic and market factors and the industry in which we do business, among other things.
Forward-looking statements are not guaranties of future performance. Forward-looking statements may
be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as may, can, will, could,
should, project, expect, plan, predict, believe, estimate, aim, anticipate,
intend, continue, potential, opportunity or similar terms, variations of those terms or the
negative of those terms or other variations of those terms or comparable words or expressions.
Unless otherwise provided, Arcadia, we, us, our, and the Company refer to Arcadia
Resources, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Actual events and results may differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in
forward-looking statements due to a number of factors. Important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially include, but are not limited to (1) our ability to compete with our
competitors; (2) our ability to obtain additional debt or equity financing, if necessary, and/or to
restructure existing indebtedness, which may be difficult due to our history of operating losses
and negative cash flows; (3) the ability of our affiliated agencies to effectively market and sell
our services and products; (4) our ability to procure product inventory for resale; (5) our ability
to recruit and retain temporary workers for placement with our customers; (6) the timely collection
of our accounts receivable; (7) our ability to attract and retain key management employees; (8) our
ability to timely develop new services and products and enhance existing services and products; (9)
our ability to execute and implement our growth strategy; (10) the impact of governmental
regulations; (11) marketing risks; (12) our ability to adapt to economic, political and regulatory
conditions affecting the health care industry; (13) our ability to successfully integrate
acquisitions; (14) the ability of our management team to successfully pursue our business plan;
(15) other unforeseen events that may impact our business; and (16) the risks, uncertainties and
other factors described in Part II, Item 1A of this Report which are incorporated herein by this
reference.
Overview
Arcadia Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation, together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the
Company), is a national provider of home care, medical staffing, and pharmacy services operating
under the service mark Arcadia HealthCare. In May 2009, the Company disposed of its Home Health
Equipment (HHE), industrial staffing and retail pharmacy software businesses. Subsequent to
these divestitures, the Company operates in three reportable business segments: Home Care/Medical
Staffing Services (Services), Pharmacy and Catalog. The Companys corporate headquarters are
located in Indianapolis, Indiana. The Company conducts its business from approximately 65
facilities located in 20 states. The
Company operates pharmacies in Indiana and Minnesota and has customer service centers in Michigan
and Indiana.
23
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies
See Part II, Item 7 Critical Accounting Policies, our consolidated financial statements and
related notes in Part IV, Item 15 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31,
2009 filed with the SEC on July 14, 2009 for accounting policies and related estimates we believe
are the most critical to understanding our condensed consolidated financial statements, financial
condition and results of operations and which require complex management judgment and assumptions,
or involve uncertainties.
Three-Month Period Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to the Three-Month Period Ended September 30,
2008
Results of Continuing Operations, (in thousands, except share amounts)
Three-Month Period | ||||||||
Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Revenues, net |
$ | 25,616 | $ | 26,719 | ||||
Cost of revenues |
18,210 | 18,504 | ||||||
Gross profit |
7,406 | 8,215 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
10,082 | 10,081 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
531 | 613 | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
10,613 | 10,694 | ||||||
Operating loss |
(3,207 | ) | (2,479 | ) | ||||
Other expenses |
840 | 1,098 | ||||||
Net loss before income tax expense |
(4,047 | ) | (3,577 | ) | ||||
Income tax expense |
7 | 198 | ||||||
Net loss from continuing operations |
$ | (4,054 | ) | $ | (3,775 | ) | ||
Weighted average number of shares basic and diluted |
161,201,000 | 133,019,000 | ||||||
Net loss from continuing operations per share
basic and diluted |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | ||
24
Table of Contents
Revenues, Cost of Revenues and Gross Profits
The following summarizes revenues, cost of revenues and gross profits by segment for the
three-month periods ended September 30, (in thousands):
% of Total | % of Total | $ Increase/ | % Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | Revenue | 2008 | Revenue | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenues, net: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Services |
$ | 21,709 | 84.7 | % | $ | 24,824 | 92.9 | % | $ | (3,115 | ) | -12.5 | % | |||||||||||
Pharmacy |
3,409 | 13.3 | % | 1,214 | 4.5 | % | 2,195 | 180.8 | % | |||||||||||||||
Catalog |
498 | 2.0 | % | 681 | 2.6 | % | (183 | ) | -26.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
25,616 | 100.0 | % | 26,719 | 100.0 | % | (1,103 | ) | -4.1 | % | |||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Services |
$ | 15,028 | $ | 17,113 | $ | (2,085 | ) | -12.2 | % | |||||||||||||||
Pharmacy |
2,895 | 1,012 | 1,883 | 186.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Catalog |
287 | 379 | (92 | ) | -24.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
18,210 | 18,504 | (294 | ) | -1.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Margin % | Margin % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross margins: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Services |
6,681 | 30.8 | % | 7,711 | 31.1 | % | (1,030 | ) | -13.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Pharmacy |
514 | 15.1 | % | 202 | 16.6 | % | 312 | 154.5 | % | |||||||||||||||
Catalog |
211 | 42.4 | % | 302 | 44.3 | % | (91 | ) | -30.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
$ | 7,406 | 28.9 | % | $ | 8,215 | 30.7 | % | $ | (809 | ) | -9.8 | % | ||||||||||||
The following table summarizes the components of the Services segment revenues for the three-month
periods ended September 30, (in thousands):
% of Total | % of Total | $ Increase/ | % Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | Revenue | 2008 | Revenue | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||
Home care |
$ | 17,255 | 79.5 | % | $ | 17,451 | 70.3 | % | $ | (196 | ) | -1.1 | % | |||||||||||
Medical staffing |
3,127 | 14.4 | % | 4,985 | 20.1 | % | (1,858 | ) | -37.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Travel staffing |
1,327 | 6.1 | % | 2,388 | 9.6 | % | (1,061 | ) | -44.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total Services |
$ | 21,709 | 100.0 | % | $ | 24,824 | 100.0 | % | $ | (3,115 | ) | -12.5 | % | |||||||||||
Services Segment
The Services segment remains the largest source of revenue for the Company. Home care revenue as a
percentage of Services revenue continues to increase, reaching 79.5% of revenue during the second
quarter of fiscal 2010. Home care revenues fell by $196,000, or 1.1%, from $17.451,000 to
$17,255,000 over the
same period a year ago. The modest decline was principally caused by reductions in reimbursement
per billable hour in some state-sponsored home care programs and by a revenue decline in Michigan,
one of the Companys largest home care markets, due largely to economic conditions reducing the
number of billable hours during the period.
25
Table of Contents
The negative trends in the medical staffing and travel staffing markets continued in the fiscal
second quarter 2010. Medical staffing and travel staffing declined by 37.3% and 44.4%,
respectively, as compared with the prior year quarter. Demand for the Companys per diem and travel
medical staffing services declined as compared with the same period a year ago. Several factors
have contributed to the lower level of overall demand. Market conditions for temporary medical
staffing are currently not favorable, driven by lower patient censuses in facilities; constraints
on facility staffing budgets; the return of part-time staff to full-time status and increases in
overtime accepted by permanent staff of our potential customers, largely in response to overall
economic conditions; and delays in the construction and opening of new facilities that often drives
short-term staffing requirements. In addition to these market conditions, travel staffing revenues
have been adversely affected by state budget constraints with a major correctional institution
customer.
Gross margin in the Home Care and Medical Staffing business of 30.8% was essentially flat compared
with the 31.0% gross margin in same quarter a year ago. While the overall mix of higher margin
home care business increased as a percentage of total revenues, this gross margin benefit was
offset by several factors. These factors included a reduction in margins on several
state-sponsored home care programs, such as Arizona and California; a reduction in the percentage
of business generated in some of the companys higher margin offices and markets, including the
state of Michigan; and an overall decline in the margins in the medical staffing business due to
changes in staffing business mix.
Pharmacy Segment
The revenue in the Pharmacy segment increased by $2,195,000, or 180.8%, to $3,409,000 during the
second quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to the same period last year. This growth was driven by the
Companys DailyMed program. During the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2009, revenue generated
from the DailyMed medication management program began to increase at a more rapid pace than in
previous quarters, and the Company continues to pursue additional opportunities with government
entities, managed care organizations, assisted living and group home facilities, existing home care
customers and in direct-to-consumer initiatives. The Company expects these growth trends to
continue during fiscal 2010 and beyond. The revenue growth over the last several quarters was
primarily driven by the Companys relationship with Indiana Medicaid. The Company continues to
work with the Indiana Medicaid program and its managed care providers to identify and enroll those
patients who will benefit most from participation in the DailyMed. Additionally, in June 2009, the
Company announced the signing of an agreement with WellPoint. Under this agreement, the Company
will initiate the DailyMed medication management program to WellPoints high-risk Medicaid members
in five states where WellPoint companies provide Medicaid managed care benefits. The five states
are: California, Virginia, New York, Kansas and South Carolina. The program was launched to
WellPoints high risk members in Virginia in August, and the Company began recognizing revenue from
these patients in September. The program is expected to be rolled out to WellPoints California
patients during fiscal third quarter 2010 with revenue beginning to be recognized in fiscal fourth
quarter 2010. The Company anticipates the majority of its Pharmacy revenue growth over the next
several quarters to be attributable to the WellPoint arrangement.
The costs of revenue in the Pharmacy segment include the cost of medications and other products
sold to clients and packaging costs for the DailyMed proprietary dispensing system. Gross margins
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 were 15.1% compared to 16.6% for the prior year quarter.
Part of this decline reflects the different payer/patient mix in the Indianapolis, Indiana pharmacy
compared to the payer/patient mix serviced when the pharmacy was located in Paducah, Kentucky. In
addition, there is a different brand/generic product mix for the patients being serviced, which
impacts margins quarter over quarter. Margins improved during the most recent quarter to 15.1%
from 11.0% in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Several factors contributed to this improvement,
including changes in adjudication/billing procedures, utilization of group purchasing organization
(GPO) contracts resulting in lower drug acquisition costs, and a reduction in inventory
adjustments.
26
Table of Contents
Effective September 26, 2009, a federal court required the two industry publishers of average
wholesale prices (AWP) to reduce AWPs on some 1,400 brand drugs. This was the result of a
settlement of litigation by third parties against these publishers challenging the establishment of
AWPs on these products. AWPs are regularly used as a basis for establishing the reimbursement
received by pharmacies for products
dispensed. Some of the Companys contracts for reimbursement, and some of the reimbursement
policies of other payers, are based on discounts off of the published AWP. The industry publishers
of AWPs have also decided to extend the reduction of AWPs to a much broader group of drugs than the
list covered by the litigation settlement. Most commercial payers are adjusting their
reimbursement formulas to compensate for the reduction in AWPs and the Company is in the process of
amending agreements with these payers to reflect the new reimbursement formulas. In addition, some
state-sponsored programs are adopting modifications to their reimbursement formulas to ensure a
similar level of reimbursement to pharmacies after the change in AWPs as before the change. For
payers adopting these adjustments, no material impact on the Companys reimbursement is expected.
However, some payers, including the Indiana Medicaid program, have not adjusted their reimbursement
formulas to account for the lower AWPs and, consequently, the Company is receiving a reduced level
of reimbursement on some products effective September 26, 2009. The Company is evaluating the
impact of these reimbursement changes on its business but it is likely that the net impact will be
to reduce revenue and decrease gross margins on some portion of the Pharmacy segment business. In
addition, various proposals in the national health care reform efforts propose modifications to the
manner in which various federally-funded and state-sponsored programs reimburse pharmacies for
dispensing product. Certain of these proposals could have the effect of negatively impacting net
revenue and gross margins in future periods.
Catalog Segment
Revenue from the Companys catalog and internet-based home health products business decreased 26.7%
to $498,000 during the three-month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period last
year. The decrease in revenue is due in part to the reduction in catalog mailing to a more
targeted audience, and in part due to economic conditions as virtually all of this business is cash
and/or credit business.
The gross margin decreased to 42.3% for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to
44.3% for the same period last year primarily due to change in the mix of the products being sold.
27
Table of Contents
Selling, General and Administrative
The following summarizes selling, general and administrative expenses by segment for the
three-month periods ended September 30, (in thousands):
% of Total | % of Total | $ Increase/ | % Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | SG&A | 2008 | SG&A | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||
Services |
$ | 5,454 | 54.1 | % | $ | 6,330 | 62.8 | % | $ | (876 | ) | -13.8 | % | |||||||||||
Pharmacy |
1,873 | 18.6 | % | 988 | 9.8 | % | 885 | 89.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
Catalog |
204 | 2.0 | % | 298 | 3.0 | % | (94 | ) | -31.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Corporate |
2,551 | 25.3 | % | 2,465 | 24.4 | % | 86 | 3.5 | % | |||||||||||||||
$ | 10,082 | 100.0 | % | $ | 10,081 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||
SG&A as a % of net
revenue |
39.4 | % | 37.7 | % |
Services Segment
The Services segment selling, general and administrative expense decreased to $5,454,000 for the
three-month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to $6,330,000 for the same period in the prior
year. This $876,000, or 13.8%, decrease was primarily due to a $388,000 decrease in commissions
paid to the affiliates and a $384,000 decrease in employee costs. Affiliate commissions are based
on the gross margins of the individual affiliates, and the decrease reflects a decrease in revenues
and gross margins generated from the affiliate owned locations. The decrease in employee costs was
a direct result of the Companys efforts to reduce headcount in certain areas.
Pharmacy Segment
The Pharmacy segment selling, general and administrative expense increased by $885,000, or 89.6%,
to $1,873,000 during the second quarter of fiscal 2010. In general, the increase in Pharmacy
expenses was due to the recent growth in revenue in this segment, as well as the continued
investment in infrastructure in advance of the anticipated revenue growth during the next several
quarters, primarily resulting from the WellPoint arrangement. Specifically, total employee costs
increased by $463,000 during the three-month period ended September 30, 2009 as the Company hired
additional pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, and customer service representatives in order to
process the increased volume. Additionally, the Company used more contract and temporary labor as
well as consultants during this high growth period, and this contributed an additional $104,000 in
expense. The remaining increase during the current year quarter was due to various other variable
administrative expenses, such as bad debt and shipping, that increased with the growth in revenue.
The DailyMed program includes a significant level of patient care and value-added services designed
to improve compliance, adherence and safety of a patients medication regimen. These pharmacy
services include consolidation, synchronization and transfer of prescriptions and medication
therapy management (MTM) services. The Company makes a significant investment in these services as
they are a key part to achieving the patient benefits and health care cost reductions associated
with DailyMed. The Companys business model contemplates that payers will be willing to share some
of these cost savings as they are realized. The Company has elected to provide these services to
Indiana Medicaid customers without a cost-sharing arrangement as Indiana Medicaid has entered into
a research agreement with the Purdue University School of Pharmacy to study DailyMeds ability to
reduce total health care costs. The Company currently has a cost-sharing arrangement with
WellPoint, which has specific target savings and trigger dates. This revenue will not be realized
until certain points in time in the future. As cost sharing agreements become a more significant
part of the Companys revenue, management anticipates overall profitability will improve.
28
Table of Contents
Catalog Segment
The Catalog segment selling, general and administrative expense decreased by $94,000, or 31.5%,
during the three-month period ended September 30, 2009. The decrease was primarily due to a
$88,000 decrease in the costs to produce and mail catalogs.
Corporate
Corporate selling, general and administrative expense increased to $2,551,000 for the three-month
period ended September 30, 2009 compared to $2,465,000 for the same period in the prior year. This
$86,000, or 3.5%, increase was due to a $230,000 increase in legal fees and $117,000 increase in
other professional fees. The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims which
arise in the ordinary course of business. The timing and cost of these issues are often erratic,
and the increase in legal fees reflects a period of higher activity. The increase in professional
fees was due to certain audit-related costs and fees for investment bank advisor services incurred
during the current year quarter. These increases were partially offset by a $113,000 decrease in
employee costs, which reflects reductions in headcount.
The Company divested of its home health equipment, industrial staffing and retail pharmacy software
businesses during the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Subsequent to these divestitures, the Company
began to reduce Corporate expenses in order to reduce overhead for the remaining business lines.
These expense reduction initiatives will continue over the next several quarters and will primarily
focus on employee costs and professional fees.
Depreciation and Amortization
The following summarizes depreciation and amortization expense for the three-month periods ended
September 30, (in thousands):
$ Increase/ | % Increase/ | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property
and equipment |
$ | 372 | $ | 307 | $ | 65 | 21.2 | % | ||||||||
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
159 | 306 | (147 | ) | -48.0 | % | ||||||||||
$ | 531 | $ | 613 | $ | (82 | ) | -13.4 | % | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment increased by approximately $65,000, or
21.2%, during the three-month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period last
year. The increase reflects the increase in depreciation associated with various software and
Pharmacy equipment acquired during the last year.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets decreased by $147,000, or 48.0%, during the fiscal
second quarter 2010 compared to fiscal 2009. The decrease reflects the fact that as of March 31,
2009, the Company recognized certain impairment charges relating to amortizable intangible assets
associated with the Pharmacy and Catalog segments, which ultimately reduced future amortization
expense.
Other Expenses
The following summarizes net interest expense for the three-month periods ended September 30, (in
thousands):
$ Increase/ | % Increase/ | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 850 | $ | 1,068 | $ | (218 | ) | -20.4 | % | |||||||
Interest income |
(4 | ) | (14 | ) | 10 | -71.4 | % | |||||||||
$ | 846 | $ | 1,054 | $ | (208 | ) | -19.7 | % | ||||||||
29
Table of Contents
Interest expense for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009 decreased by $218,000, or
20.4%, to $850,000 as compared to the same period last year. The average interest bearing
liabilities balance (balance of the beginning of the period plus the end of the period divided by
two) for fiscal 2010 was $33.6 million compared to $36.9 million for fiscal 2009, which represents
a reduction of 8.9%. The overall reduction of debt combined with the timing of the reductions
resulted in the decrease in interest expense.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $7,000 for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to
$198,000 for the three-month period ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $191,000. The income
tax expense is primarily the result of state income tax liabilities of the subsidiary operating
companies. The majority of the prior period expense related to the estimated tax liability in
Michigan associated with the industrial staffing business, which was divested of by the Company in
May 2009.
Due to the Companys losses in recent years, it has paid nominal federal income taxes. For federal
income tax purposes, the Company had significant permanent and timing differences between book
income and taxable income resulting in combined net deferred tax assets of $32 million to be
utilized by the Company for which an offsetting valuation allowance has been established for the
entire amount. The Company has a net operating loss carryforward for tax purposes totaling $59.2
million that expires at various dates through 2029. Internal Revenue Code Section 382 rules limit
the utilization of certain of these net operating loss carryforwards upon a change of control of
the Company. It has been determined that a change in control took place at the time of the reverse
merger in 2004, and as such, the utilization of $700,000 of the net operating loss carryforwards
will be subject to severe limitations in future periods.
Loss from Discontinued Operations
Industrial Staffing Operations
On May 29, 2009, the Company finalized the sale of substantially all of the assets of its
industrial and non-medical staffing business for cash proceeds of $250,000, which were paid in five
equal installments through September 2009. Additionally, the Company will receive 50% of the
future earnings of the business until the total payments equal $1.6 million. Such payments, if
any, will be recorded as additional gains when earned. The Company retained all accounts
receivable for services provided prior to May 29, 2009.
For the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, the net loss for the Industrial Staffing
discontinued operations was $8,000, and the Company recognized an additional $3,000 gain on the
disposal of discontinued operations.
HHE Operations
On January 5, 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Braden Partners, L.P.
to sell the assets of its HHE business in San Fernando, California. Total proceeds were originally
estimated to be $503,000, less fees of $24,000. This amount included $126,000 that was to be held
back by the buyer to cover certain contingent obligations of the Company. During the three-month
period ended September 30, 2009, the Company and the buyer resolved certain claims and the holdback
amount of $126,000 was forfeited by the Company. The Company retained all accounts receivables for
services provided prior to January 2009.
On May 18, 2009, the Company completed the sale of its ownership interest in Lovell Medical Supply,
Inc., Beacon Respiratory Services of Georgia, Inc., and Trinity Healthcare of Winston-Salem, Inc.
to Aerocare Holdings, Inc. for total proceeds of $4,750,000, less fees of $150,000. At the time of
closing, $475,000 of the purchase price was held by the buyer to cover the Companys contingent
obligations. In September 2009, the buyer released $160,000 of this amount, which was recognized
as an additional gain on the sale. The entities sold represented the Southeast region of the
Companys HHE business.
On May 19, 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Braden Partners, L.P. to
sell the assets of its Midwest region of the Companys HHE business. Total proceeds were
$4,000,000, less fees of $150,000. $1,000,000 of the purchase price is being held by the buyer to
cover the Companys contingent obligations. The Company retained all accounts receivable for
services provided prior to May 2009.
30
Table of Contents
As of May 2009, the Company had sold all of its HHE operations.
For the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, the net loss for the HHE discontinued
operations was $189,000 and the Company recognized an additional $160,000 gain on the disposal of
discontinued operations. The gain represents the release of the first holdback payment received in
September 2009.
Pharmacy Operations
On June 11, 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with a leading pharmacy
management company to sell substantially all of the assets of JASCORP, LLC (JASCORP) for proceeds
of $2,200,000, less estimated fees of $100,000. $220,000 of the purchase price is being held back
by the buyer until December 2011 in order to cover the Companys contingent obligations. JASCORP
operated the retail pharmacy software business that the Company acquired in September 2007. As
part of the divestiture, the Company entered into a License and Services Agreement with the buyer
that provides the Company the right to continue to use the software for internal purposes.
For the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, the net loss for the Pharmacy discontinued
operations was $58,000.
Six-Month Period Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to the Six-Month Period Ended September 30, 2008
Results of Continuing Operations, (in thousands, except share amounts)
Six-Month Period | ||||||||
Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Revenues, net |
$ | 52,025 | $ | 53,497 | ||||
Cost of revenues |
37,171 | 37,172 | ||||||
Gross profit |
14,854 | 16,325 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
19,748 | 20,263 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
942 | 1,072 | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
20,690 | 21,335 | ||||||
Operating loss |
(5,836 | ) | (5,010 | ) | ||||
Other expenses |
1,714 | 2,312 | ||||||
Net loss before income tax expense |
(7,550 | ) | (7,322 | ) | ||||
Income tax expense |
100 | 394 | ||||||
Net loss from continuing operations |
$ | (7,650 | ) | $ | (7,716 | ) | ||
Weighted average number of shares basic and diluted |
160,709,000 | 132,357,000 | ||||||
Net loss from continuing operations per share
basic and diluted |
$ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | ||
31
Table of Contents
Revenues, Cost of Revenues and Gross Profits
The following summarizes revenues, cost of revenues and gross profits by segment for the six-month
periods ended September 30, (in thousands):
% of Total | % of Total | $ Increase/ | % Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | Revenue | 2008 | Revenue | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenues, net: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Services |
$ | 44,389 | 85.3 | % | $ | 49,831 | 93.1 | % | $ | (5,442 | ) | -10.9 | % | |||||||||||
Pharmacy |
6,626 | 12.7 | % | 2,319 | 4.3 | % | 4,307 | 185.7 | % | |||||||||||||||
Catalog |
1,010 | 2.0 | % | 1,347 | 2.6 | % | (337 | ) | -25.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
52,025 | 100.0 | % | 53,497 | 100.0 | % | (1,472 | ) | -2.8 | % | |||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Services |
$ | 30,792 | $ | 34,513 | $ | (3,721 | ) | -10.8 | % | |||||||||||||||
Pharmacy |
5,757 | 1,925 | 3,832 | 199.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Catalog |
622 | 734 | (112 | ) | -15.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
37,171 | 37,172 | (1 | ) | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Margin % | Margin % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross margins: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Services |
13,597 | 30.6 | % | 15,318 | 30.7 | % | (1,721 | ) | -11.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
Pharmacy |
869 | 13.1 | % | 394 | 17.0 | % | 475 | 120.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
Catalog |
388 | 38.4 | % | 613 | 45.5 | % | (225 | ) | -36.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
$ | 14,854 | 28.6 | % | $ | 16,325 | 30.5 | % | $ | (1,471 | ) | -9.0 | % | ||||||||||||
The following table summarizes the components of the Services segment revenues for the six-month
periods ended September 30, (in thousands):
% of Total | % of Total | $ Increase/ | % Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | Revenue | 2008 | Revenue | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||
Home care |
$ | 34,943 | 78.7 | % | $ | 34,349 | 68.9 | % | $ | 594 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Medical staffing |
6,702 | 15.1 | % | 10,495 | 21.1 | % | (3,793 | ) | -36.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
Travel staffing |
2,744 | 6.1 | % | 4,987 | 10.0 | % | (2,243 | ) | -45.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total Services |
$ | 44,389 | 100.0 | % | $ | 49,831 | 100.0 | % | $ | (5,442 | ) | -10.9 | % | |||||||||||
Services Segment
The Services segment remains the largest source of revenue for the Company. Home care revenue as a
percentage of Services revenue continues to increase, reaching 78.7% of revenue during the
six-month period ended September 30, 2009. Home care revenues increased by $594,000, or 1.7%, from
$34,349,000 to $34,943,000 over the same period a year ago.
The increases in home care revenue were more than offset by the declines in revenue in the medical
staffing and travel staffing markets, which declined by 36.1% and 45.0%, respectively, as compared
with the prior year period. Demand for the Companys per diem and travel medical staffing services
declined as compared with the same period a year ago. Several factors have contributed to the
lower level of overall demand. Market conditions for temporary medical staffing are currently not
favorable, driven by lower patient censuses in facilities; constraints on facility staffing
budgets; the return of part-time staff to full-time status and increases in overtime accepted by
permanent staff of our potential customers, largely in response to overall economic conditions; and
delays in the construction and opening of new facilities that often drives short-term staffing
requirements. In addition to these market conditions, travel staffing revenues have been adversely
affected by state budget constraints with a major correctional institution customer.
32
Table of Contents
Gross margins in the Services segment remained approximately flat at 30.6% during the six-month
period ended September 30, 2009 compared to 30.7% for the prior year period. The cost of revenues
in this segment consists primarily of employee costs, including wages, taxes, fringe benefits and
workers compensation expense.
Pharmacy Segment
The revenue in the Pharmacy segment increased by $4,307,000, or 186%, to $6,626,000 during the
six-month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period last year. This growth was
driven by the Companys DailyMed program. During the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2009,
revenue generated from the DailyMed medication management program began to increase at a more rapid
pace than in previous quarters, and the Company continues to pursue additional opportunities with
government entities, managed care organizations, assisted living and group home facilities,
existing home care customers and in direct-to-consumer initiatives. The Company expects these
growth trends to continue during fiscal 2010 and beyond. The revenue growth over the last several
quarters was primarily driven by the Companys relationship with Indiana Medicaid. The Company
continues to work with the Indiana Medicaid program and its managed care providers to identify and
enroll those patients who will benefit most from participation in the DailyMed. Additionally, in
June 2009, the Company announced the signing of an agreement with WellPoint. Under this agreement,
the Company will initiate the DailyMed medication management program to WellPoints high-risk
Medicaid members in five states where WellPoint companies provide Medicaid managed care benefits.
The five states are: California, Virginia, New York, Kansas and South Carolina. The program was
launched to WellPoints high risk members in Virginia in August, and the Company began recognizing
revenue from these patients in September. The program is expected to be rolled out to WellPoints
California patients during fiscal third quarter 2010 with revenue beginning to be recognized in
fiscal fourth quarter 2010.
The costs of revenue in the Pharmacy segment include the cost of medications and other products
sold to clients and packaging costs for the DailyMed proprietary dispensing system. Gross margins
for the six-month period ended September 30, 2009 were 13.1% compared to 17.0% for the prior year
period. Part of this decline reflects the different payer/patient mix in the Indianapolis, Indiana
pharmacy compared to the payer/patient mix serviced when the pharmacy was located in Paducah,
Kentucky. In addition, there is a different brand/generic product mix for the patients being
serviced, which impacts margins quarter over quarter. Margins improved during the most recent
quarter to 15.1% from 11.0% in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Several factors contributed to
this improvement, including changes in adjudication/billing procedures, utilization of group
purchasing organization (GPO) contracts resulting in lower drug acquisition costs, and a reduction
in inventory adjustments.
33
Table of Contents
Effective September 26, 2009, a federal court required the two industry publishers of average
wholesale prices (AWP) to reduce AWPs on some 1,400 brand drugs. This was the result of a
settlement of litigation by third parties against these publishers challenging the establishment of
AWPs on these products. AWPs
are regularly used as a basis for establishing the reimbursement received by pharmacies for
products dispensed. Some of the Companys contracts for reimbursement, and some of the
reimbursement policies of other payers, are based on discounts off of the published AWP. The
industry publishers of AWPs have also decided to extend the reduction of AWPs to a much broader
group of drugs than the list covered by the litigation settlement. Most commercial payers are
adjusting their reimbursement formulas to compensate for the reduction in AWPs and the Company is
in the process of amending agreements with these payers to reflect the new reimbursement formulas.
In addition, some state-sponsored programs are adopting modifications to their reimbursement
formulas to ensure a similar level of reimbursement to pharmacies after the change in AWPs as
before the change. For payers adopting these adjustments, no material impact on the Companys
reimbursement is expected. However, some payers, including the Indiana Medicaid program, have not
adjusted their reimbursement formulas to account for the lower AWPs and, consequently, the Company
is receiving a reduced level of reimbursement on some products effective September 26, 2009. The
Company is evaluating the impact of these reimbursement changes on its business but it is likely
that the net impact will be to reduce revenue and decrease gross margins on some portion of the
Pharmacy segment business. In addition, various proposals in the national health care reform
efforts propose modifications to the manner in which various federally-funded and state-sponsored
programs reimburse pharmacies for dispensing product. Certain of these proposals could have the
effect of negatively impacting net revenue and gross margins in future periods.
Catalog Segment
Revenue from the Companys catalog and internet-based home health products business decreased 25.1%
to $1,010,000 during the six-month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period last
year. The decrease in revenue is due in part to the reduction in catalog mailing to a more
targeted audience, and in part due to economic conditions as virtually all of this business is cash
and/or credit business.
The gross margin decreased to 38.5% for the six-month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to
45.5% for the same period last year primarily due to change in the mix of the products being sold.
34
Table of Contents
Selling, General and Administrative
The following summarizes selling, general and administrative expenses by segment for the six-month
periods ended September 30, (in thousands):
% of Total | % of Total | $ Increase/ | % Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | SG&A | 2008 | SG&A | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||
Services |
$ | 10,968 | 55.5 | % | $ | 12,489 | 61.6 | % | $ | (1,521 | ) | -12.2 | % | |||||||||||
Pharmacy |
3,454 | 17.5 | % | 1,900 | 9.4 | % | 1,554 | 81.8 | % | |||||||||||||||
Catalog |
419 | 2.1 | % | 587 | 2.9 | % | (168 | ) | -28.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
Corporate |
4,907 | 24.9 | % | 5,287 | 26.1 | % | (380 | ) | -7.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
$ | 19,748 | 100.0 | % | $ | 20,263 | 100.0 | % | $ | (515 | ) | -2.5 | % | ||||||||||||
SG&A as a % of net
revenue |
38.0 | % | 37.9 | % |
Services Segment
The Services segment selling, general and administrative expense decreased to $10,968,000 for the
six-month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to $12,489,000 for the same period in the prior
year. This $1,521,000, or 12.2%, decrease was primarily due to a $757,000 decrease in commissions
paid to the affiliates and a $654,000 decrease in employee costs. Affiliate commissions are based
on the gross margins of the individual affiliates, and the decrease reflects a decrease in revenues
and gross margins generated from the affiliate owned locations. The decrease in employee costs was
a direct result of the Companys efforts to reduce headcount in certain areas.
Pharmacy Segment
The Pharmacy segment selling, general and administrative expense increased by $1,554,000, or 81.8%,
to $3,454,000 during the six-month period ended September 30, 2009. In general, the increase in
Pharmacy expenses was due to the recent growth in revenue in this segment, as well as the continued
investment in infrastructure in advance of the anticipated revenue growth during the next several
quarters, primarily resulting from the WellPoint arrangement. Specifically, total employee costs
increased by $790,000 during the six-month period ended September 30, 2009 as the Company hired
additional pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, and customer service representatives in order to
process the increased volume. Additionally, the Company used more contract and temporary labor as
well as consultants during the current year quarter, and this contributed an additional $229,000 in
expense. Shipping costs and bad debt expense also increased during the quarter by $148,000 and
$109,000, respectively, which was consistent with the revenue growth. The remaining increase
during the current year quarter was due to various other administrative expenses that increased
with the growth in revenue and headcount that has occurred over the last three quarters.
The DailyMed program includes a significant level of patient care and value-added services designed
to improve compliance, adherence and safety of a patients medication regimen. These pharmacy
services include consolidation, synchronization and transfer of prescriptions and medication
therapy management (MTM) services. The Company makes a significant investment in these services as
they are a key part to achieving the patient benefits and health care cost reductions associated
with DailyMed. The Companys business model contemplates that payers will be willing to share some
of these cost savings as they are realized. The Company has elected to provide these services to
Indiana Medicaid customers without a cost-sharing arrangement as Indiana Medicaid has entered into
a research agreement with the Purdue University School of Pharmacy to study DailyMeds ability to
reduce total health care costs. The Company currently has a cost-sharing arrangement with
WellPoint, which has specific target savings and trigger dates. This revenue will not be realized
until certain points in time in the future. As cost sharing agreements become a more significant
part of the Companys revenue, management anticipates overall profitability will improve.
35
Table of Contents
Catalog Segment
The Catalog segment selling, general and administrative expense decreased by $168,000, or 28.6%,
during the six-month period ended September 30, 2009. These decreases were primarily due to a
$143,000 decrease in the costs to produce and mail catalogs.
Corporate
Corporate selling, general and administrative expense decreased to $4,907,000 for the six-month
period ended September 30, 2009 compared to $5,287,000 for the same period in the prior year. This
$380,000, or 7.2%, decrease was primarily due to decreases in most expense categories subsequent to
the divestitures of the home health equipment, industrial staffing and retail pharmacy software
businesses during the fiscal first quarter 2010. The largest such decrease was employee costs,
which decreased by $389,000. These decreases were partially offset by a $303,000 increase in legal
fees.
Over the next several quarters, the Company will continue to reduce Corporate expenses in an effort
to reduce Corporate overhead for the remaining business lines and will primarily focus on employee
costs and professional fees.
Depreciation and Amortization
The following summarizes depreciation and amortization expense for the six-month periods ended
September 30, (in thousands):
$ Increase/ | % Increase/ | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property
and equipment |
$ | 625 | $ | 465 | $ | 160 | 34.4 | % | ||||||||
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
317 | 607 | (290 | ) | -47.8 | % | ||||||||||
$ | 942 | $ | 1,072 | $ | (130 | ) | -12.1 | % | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment increased by $160,000, or 34.4%, during the
six-month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period last year. The increase
reflects the increase in depreciation associated with various software and Pharmacy equipment
acquired during the last year.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets decreased by $290,000, or 47.8%, during the six-month
period ended September 30, 2009 compared to prior year period. The decrease reflects the fact that
as of March 31, 2009, the Company recognized certain impairment charges relating to amortizable
intangible assets associated with the Pharmacy and Catalog segments, which ultimately reduced
future amortization expense.
Other Expenses
The following summarizes net interest expense for the six-month periods ended September 30, (in
thousands):
$ Increase/ | % Increase/ | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 1,695 | $ | 2,042 | $ | (347 | ) | -17.0 | % | |||||||
Interest income |
(11 | ) | (32 | ) | 21 | -65.6 | % | |||||||||
$ | 1,684 | $ | 2,010 | $ | (326 | ) | -16.2 | % | ||||||||
Interest expense for the six-month period ended September 30, 2009 decreased by $347,000, or 17.0%,
to $1,695,000 as compared to the same period last year. The average interest bearing liabilities
balance (balance of the beginning of the period plus the end of the period divided by two) for
fiscal 2010 was $36.7 million compared to $38.4 million for fiscal 2009, which represents a
reduction of 4.5%. The overall reduction of debt combined with the timing of the reductions
resulted in the decrease in interest expense.
36
Table of Contents
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt
On June 5, 2008, the Company issued AmerisourceBergen 490,000 warrants to purchase common stock at
an exercise price of $0.75 per share. The warrants were issued in conjunction with obtaining a
waiver for a financial covenant violation relating to the AmerisourcBergen line of credit, which
was paid in full in June 2009. The fair value of the warrants was determined to be $248,000 and
was recorded as a loss on extinguishment of debt during the six-month period ended September 30,
2008. No similar expense was recognized during the six-month period ended September 30, 2009.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $100,000 for the six-month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to
$394,000 for the six-month period ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $294,000. The income tax
expense is primarily the result of state income tax liabilities of the subsidiary operating
companies. The majority of the prior period expense related to the estimated tax liability in
Michigan associated with the industrial staffing business, which was divested of by the Company in
May 2009. The Company uses a centralized approach for income tax purposes, and, accordingly,
income tax expenses were not specifically allocated to discontinued operations.
Due to the Companys losses in recent years, it has paid nominal federal income taxes. For federal
income tax purposes, the Company had significant permanent and timing differences between book
income and taxable income resulting in combined net deferred tax assets of $32 million to be
utilized by the Company for which an offsetting valuation allowance has been established for the
entire amount. The Company has a net operating loss carryforward for tax purposes totaling $59.2
million that expires at various dates through 2029. Internal Revenue Code Section 382 rules limit
the utilization of certain of these net operating loss carryforwards upon a change of control of
the Company. It has been determined that a change in control took place at the time of the reverse
merger in 2004, and as such, the utilization of $700,000 of the net operating loss carryforwards
will be subject to severe limitations in future periods.
Industrial Staffing Operations
On May 29, 2009, the Company finalized the sale of substantially all of the assets of its
industrial and non-medical staffing business for cash proceeds of $250,000, which were paid in five
equal installments through September 2009. Additionally, the Company will receive 50% of the
future earnings of the business until the total payments equal $1.6 million. Such payments, if
any, will be recorded as additional gains when earned. The Company retained all accounts
receivable for services provided prior to May 29, 2009.
Through the six-month period ended September 30, 2009, the net loss for the Industrial Staffing
discontinued operations was $44,000, and the Company recognized a $129,000 gain on the disposal of
discontinued operations.
HHE Operations
On January 5, 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Braden Partners, L.P.
to sell the assets of its HHE business in San Fernando, California. Total proceeds were originally
estimated to be $503,000, less fees of $24,000. This amount included $126,000 that was to be held
back by the buyer to cover certain contingent obligations of the Company. During the three-month
period ended September 30, 2009, the Company and the buyer resolved certain claims and the holdback
amount of $126,000 was forfeited by the Company. The Company retained all accounts receivables for
services provided prior to January 2009.
37
Table of Contents
On May 18, 2009, the Company completed the sale of its ownership interest in Lovell Medical Supply,
Inc., Beacon Respiratory Services of Georgia, Inc., and Trinity Healthcare of Winston-Salem, Inc.
to
Aerocare Holdings, Inc. for total proceeds of $4,750,000, less fees of $150,000. At the time of
closing, $475,000 of the purchase price was held by the buyer to cover the Companys contingent
obligations. In September 2009, the buyer released $160,000 of this amount, which was recognized
as an additional gain on the sale. The entities sold represented the Southeast region of the
Companys HHE business.
On May 19, 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Braden Partners, L.P. to
sell the assets of its Midwest region of the Companys HHE business. Total proceeds were
$4,000,000, less fees of $150,000. $1,000,000 of the purchase price is being held by the buyer to
cover the Companys contingent obligations. The Company retained all accounts receivable for
services provided prior to May 2009.
As of May 2009, the Company had sold all of its HHE operations.
Through the six-month period ended September 30, 2009, the net loss for the HHE discontinued
operations was $1,230,000 and the Company recognized a $280,000 gain on the disposal of
discontinued operations.
Pharmacy Operations
On June 11, 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with a leading pharmacy
management company to sell substantially all of the assets of JASCORP, LLC (JASCORP) for proceeds
of $2,200,000, less estimated fees of $100,000. $220,000 of the purchase price is being held back
by the buyer until December 2011 in order to cover the Companys contingent obligations. JASCORP
operated the retail pharmacy software business that the Company acquired in September 2007. As
part of the divestiture, the Company entered into a License and Services Agreement with the buyer
that provides the Company the right to continue to use the software for internal purposes.
Through the six-month period ended September 30, 2009, the net loss for the Pharmacy discontinued
operations was $174,000, and the Company recognized a $204,000 loss on the disposal of discontinued
operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since fiscal 2008, the Company has been focused on the implementation of a board approved strategic
plan designed to focus on expanding certain core businesses; restructuring the Companys long-term
debt; closing or selling non-strategic businesses and assets; improving operating margins; reducing
selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses; and establishing a more disciplined approach
to cash management. To date, management has made progress in these areas as discussed below.
On March 25, 2009, the Company restructured $24 million of debt with its two largest equity holders
and received an additional $3 million in debt financing as part of the transaction. The debt
maturity was extended through April 1, 2012, and the Company will continue to have the option to
add the accrued interest to the principal balance on a quarterly basis. The debt agreements
include a formula for splitting the cash proceeds upon the sale of assets. (See Note 6
Long-Term Obligations for details).
On July 13, 2009, the Company executed an amendment to its line of credit agreement with Comerica
Bank. The amendment reduced the total availability from $19 million to $14 million; extended the
maturity from October 2009 to August 2011; and increased the interest rate from the prime rate plus
1% to the prime rate plus 2.75%.
In May and June 2009, the Company sold its HHE, industrial staffing and pharmacy software
businesses and received an aggregate of $9,157,000 in cash proceeds at the closings. The Company
used $5,921,000 of the proceeds to pay down debt balances due to JANA, Vicis and AmerisourceBergen
Drug Corporation. Cash proceeds from all divestitures received at the closings, net of fees, less
amounts used to pay down debt were $2,629,000. The transactions included holdback provisions for
an additional $1,475,000 in cash, which is to be released assuming certain criteria. The Company
plans to use the cash received from the release of the holdback amounts to further reduce debt.
As of September 30, 2009, the Company had $3.4 million in cash and line of credit availability.
38
Table of Contents
On November 6, 2009, the Company entered into definitive agreements with certain institutional
investors to sell an aggregate of 15,857,141 shares of common stock and 7,135,713 warrants to
purchase common stock. The Company will raise $10,154,000 in net proceeds from this transaction,
which is expected to be finalized on or before November 17, 2009. Consistent with the terms of the
debt agreement dated September 10, 2009, the Company will use $2,400,000 of the net proceeds to pay
off the outstanding balance. The remaining $7,754,000
will be used to fund on-going operations (See Note 13 Subsequent Event).
The Company is now focused on improving the performance of its two remaining core business units:
Pharmacy and Services. Subsequent to the various divestitures during fiscal first quarter 2010,
management believes that its increased focus on the remaining businesses will enable it to realize
operational improvements. Within the Pharmacy segment, the Company has significantly expanded
revenue over the last 12 months and began to see improvements in the margins during the quarter
ended September 30, 2009. The success of the Pharmacy business depends heavily on the continued
increase in revenue, continued improvement in margins and the ability to reduce SG&A expenses as a
percentage of revenue. Management believes that the Companys relationships with certain large
payers and home care partners will provide the necessary revenue growth to allow the Company to
leverage its current SG&A structure, improve margins, and achieve profitability in this segment.
The timing and size of the revenue growth will be the primary driver impacting the Pharmacy
businesss financial performance over the next several quarters. However, it is expected that the
Pharmacy segment will not become profitable and will continue to be a net user of cash throughout
fiscal 2010.
Within the Services segment, the Company has seen modest increase in Home Care revenue over the
last 12 months. Management continues to explore cost-effective ways to organically grow the Home
Care revenue. At the same time, the Company has seen a significant reduction in medical staffing
revenue consistent with overall staffing industry trends. The Company has reduced the SG&A in this
segment over the last 12 months and will continue to look for additional cost-saving opportunities.
Management expects these on-going initiatives to improve the Service segment results during the
second half of fiscal 2010 and beyond. At current levels of revenue, it is unlikely that the
profitability of the Services segment will be sufficient to offset the losses and cash usage in the
Pharmacy segment.
Management believes that the additional cash raised with the November 13, 2009 equity financing
will provide the Company with the capital necessary to support operating cash requirements.
The following summarizes the Companys cash flows for the six-month periods ended September 30, (in
thousands):
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
$ | (3,247 | ) | $ | (27 | ) | ||
Net cash provided (used in) investing activities |
8,528 | (516 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(6,803 | ) | (3,514 | ) | ||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | (1,522 | ) | $ | (4,057 | ) | ||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
| 2,294 | ||||||
Availability under line of credit agreements |
$ | 3,442 | $ | 1,818 |
At September 30, 2009, the Company had $3,442,000 in cash and line of credit availability compared
to $4,467,000 at March 31, 2009, a decrease of $1,025,000. The line of credit balance fluctuates
based on working capital needs. The line of credit availability is based on the eligible accounts
receivable within the Services segment. Subsequent to the divestiture of the industrial staffing
business in May 2009 and the amendment to the Comerica Bank line of credit agreement in July 2009,
the Services receivables and borrowing base decreased. Near the end of the quarter, the Company
typically uses its available cash to reduce the outstanding line of credit balance.
Net cash used in operating activities was $3,247,000 for the six-month period ended September 30,
2009 compared to $27,000 for the same period of the prior year. The loss from discontinued
operations during the six-month period ended September 30, 2009 accounted for $1,448,000 of the
total $8,719,000 net loss during the period. Discontinued operations contributed $1,195,000 in
income during the prior year period.
Cash provided by investing activities of $8,528,000 for the six-month period ended September 30,
2009 included $9,320,000 of cash received for the divestitures of the HHE, industrial staffing and
retail pharmacy software businesses. This amount was offset by $196,000 in cash payments relating
to prior year business acquisitions as well as $96,000 in capital expenditures. Additionally, in
conjunction with the Comerica Bank line of credit extension in July 2009, the Company invested
$500,000 of restricted cash in
order to collateralize the liability. During the six-month period ended September 30, 2008, the
Company used $429,000 of cash for business acquisitions and an additional $462,000 for capital
expenditures. These amounts were offset by $356,000 of cash proceeds from business disposals.
39
Table of Contents
Cash used in financing activities was $6,803,000 for the six-month period end September 30, 2009.
In September 2009, the Company received $2,141,0000 in additional debt financing, net of fees.
During the first two quarters of fiscal 2010, the Company made $4,334,000 in debt and capital lease
payments and reduced its outstanding balance on its lines of credit by $4,610,000. The reduction
in the line of credit balance primarily reflects the reduction in the borrowing base subsequent to
the divestiture of the industrial staffing business as the receivables of this business were
included in the borrowing base calculation. Cash used in financing activities of $3,514,000 for
the six-month period ended September 30, 2008 represents reductions in outstanding debt, including
lines of credit.
On July 13, 2009, the Company executed an amendment to its line of credit agreement with Comerica
Bank. The amendment reduced the total availability from $19,000,000 to $14,000,000; extended the
maturity from October 2009 to August 2011; and increased the interest rate from the prime rate plus
1% to the prime rate plus 2.75%. The amendment also required the Company to establish a restricted
cash at account at Comerica Bank in the amount of $500,000.
On September 10, 2009, the Company entered into three unsecured notes payable for an aggregate of
$2,400,000. The notes include an original issue discount of $100,000 and mature on April 1, 2010.
The notes include a mandatory repayment provision whereby if the Company raises in excess of
$5,000,000 in a debt or equity transaction, the notes would be paid in full.
On November 6, 2009, the Company entered into definitive agreements with certain institutional
investors to sell an aggregate of 15,857,141 shares of common stock and 7,135,713 warrants to
purchase common stock. The Company will raise $10,154,000 in net proceeds from this transaction,
which is expected to be finalized on or before November 17, 2009. Consistent with the terms of the
debt agreement dated September 10, 2009, the Company will use $2,400,000 of the net proceeds to pay
off the outstanding balance. The remaining
$7,754,000 will be used to fund on-going operations (See Note 13 Subsequent Event).
As of September 30, 2009, the Company had total debt obligations of $34,513,000, of which
$16,997,000 was payable to JANA and $6,193,000 was payable to Vicis. Both JANA and Vicis own
greater than 15% of the Companys outstanding common stock. Additionally, the Company had an
outstanding balances of $6,715,000 due to Comerica Bank under its working capital line of credit
agreement and an additional $4,608,000 due to various other lenders.
As of September 30, 2009, total debt obligations due within the next 12 months totaled $3,501,000,
of which $3,245,000 matures on or before April 1, 2010. The Companys ability to pay these amounts
will depend on its ability to raise additional capital either through additional debt or equity
financing or the sale of assets. Alternatively, management will need to renegotiate terms with
these lenders.
Net accounts receivable were $14,454,000 and $15,679,000 at September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009,
respectively. The Services segment accounted for 94% and 95% of total account receivables at
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
The Company has a limited number of customers with individually large amounts due at any given
balance sheet date. The Companys payer mix for the six-month period ended September 30, 2009 was
as follows:
Medicare |
0 | % | ||
Medicaid/other government |
28 | % | ||
Commercial insurance |
15 | % | ||
Institution/facilities |
35 | % | ||
Private pay |
22 | % |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Please see Note 1 Description of Company and Recent Accounting Pronouncements of this Report for
recent accounting pronouncements that may have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The majority of our cash balances are held primarily in highly liquid commercial bank accounts. The
Company utilizes lines of credit to fund operational cash needs. The risk associated with
fluctuating interest rates is primarily limited to our borrowings. We do not believe that a 10%
change in interest rates would have a significant effect on our results of operations or cash
flows. All our revenues since inception have been in the U.S. and in U.S. Dollars; therefore, we
have not yet adopted a strategy for the future currency rate exposure as it is not anticipated that
foreign revenues are likely to occur in the near future.
40
Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
The Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures which are designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits to the
Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), including this report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely
basis. These disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to
the Companys management on a timely basis to allow decisions regarding required disclosure.
At March 31, 2009, we reported that we had one material weakness relating to the interpretation and
application of certain technical accounting standards. This material weakness specifically related
to the accounting for certain non-routine transactions that occurred near the end of the fiscal
year and subsequent to year end, including restructuring of our debt, accounting for discontinued
operations, and changes to projections associated with our goodwill impairment valuation.
Since the prior fiscal year end, we have implemented a remediation plan to address the specific
material weakness described above. The Company has taken the following actions to improve internal
control over financial reporting: (1) we required all significant or non-routine transactions to be
thoroughly researched, analyzed, approved at the appropriate level, and documented by qualified
accounting personnel; (2) in addition, all major or non-routine transactions will require the
additional review and approval of the Chief Financial Officer; (3) we have also implemented an
additional review by subject matter experts for complex accounting estimates and accounting
treatment, where appropriate. While all non-routine transactions are unique in nature, we believe
that this plan will improve the effectiveness of our internal controls. In addition to the
specific actions described above relating to non-routine transaction, management has improved the
speed of the financial reporting closing process in order to provide management more time to
analyze non-routine transactions before internal and external deadlines.
As of September 30, 2009, the Companys management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer
(CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Other than as described above, there has been no change in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the
quarter ended September 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
We are a defendant from time to time in lawsuits incidental to our business in the ordinary course
of business. We are not currently subject to, and none of our subsidiaries are subject to, any
material legal proceedings.
41
Table of Contents
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
We have a history of operating losses and negative cash flow that may continue into the foreseeable
future.
We have a history of operating losses and negative cash flow. While we have achieved positive cash
flow from operations in some recent quarters, which was partially due to deferring certain interest
amounts, net cash flow has been negative, we continue to follow a very disciplined approach to cash
management. If we fail to execute our strategy to achieve and maintain profitability in the
future, investors could lose confidence in the value of our common stock, which could cause our
stock price to decline, adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital, and adversely
affect our ability to meet the financial covenants contained in our credit agreement. Further, if
we continue to incur operating losses and negative cash flow, we may have to implement further
significant cost cutting measures, which could include a substantial reduction in work force,
location closures, and/or the sale or disposition of certain subsidiaries. We cannot assure that
any of the cost cutting measures we implement will be effective or result in profitability or
positive cash flow. To achieve profitability, we will also need to, among other things, increase
our revenue base, reduce our cost structure and realize economies of scale. If we are unable to
achieve and maintain profitability, our stock price could be materially adversely affected.
Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and operations and prevent us from
fulfilling our debt service obligations and our ability to operate our business.
Our indebtedness could have important consequences, including, but not limited to:
| We may be unable to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital
expenditures, acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes. |
| We may be unable to plan for, or react to, changes in our business and general market
conditions. We may be more vulnerable in a volatile market and at a competitive
disadvantage to less leveraged competitors. |
| Our operating flexibility is more limited due to financial and other restrictive
covenants, including restrictions on incurring additional debt, creating liens on our
properties, making acquisitions and paying dividends. |
| We are subject to the risks that interest rates and our interest expense will
increase. |
| Our ability to use operating cash flow in other areas of our business may be limited
because we must dedicate a substantial portion of these funds to make principal and
interest payments on our indebtedness. |
| Our ability to make investments or take other actions or borrow additional funds may
be limited based on the financial and other restrictive covenants in our indebtedness. |
| The amount we are permitted to draw on our revolving credit facilities may be limited
and we may be unable to fund our early-stage pharmacy product and patient care services
and home care staffing business strategies. |
| We may be forced to implement cost reductions, which could impact our product and
service offerings. |
| We may be unable to successfully implement our growth strategy to establish home care
staffing business and spread our cost structure over a rapidly growing and larger revenue
base and ultimately become profitable. |
Due to our debt level, our history of operating losses and negative cash flows, and the current
conditions in the credit markets, we may not be able to increase the amount we can draw on our
revolving credit facility with Comerica Bank, or to obtain credit from other sources, to fund our
future needs for working capital, funding early-stage strategies and ongoing business operations,
or acquisitions.
Due to our debt level and the current conditions in the credit market, there is the risk that
Comerica Bank or other sources of credit may decline to increase the amount we are permitted to
draw on the revolving credit
facilities or to lend additional funds for working capital, funding our early-stage pharmacy
product and patient care services and home care staffing business strategies, making acquisitions
and for other purposes. This development could result in various consequences to the Company,
ranging from implementation of cost reductions, which could impact our product and service
offerings, to the need to revise managements business plan for fiscal 2010 that depends on
improvements in profitability and a disciplined approach to cash management, to the modification or
abandonment of these strategies.
42
Table of Contents
We may not be able to meet the financial covenants contained in our credit facilities, and we may
not be able to obtain waivers for any violations of those covenants should they occur.
Under certain of our existing credit facilities, we are required to adhere to certain financial
covenants. We were not in compliance with certain financial covenants under our lines of credit as
of March 31, 2008, but we received waivers of those non-compliances from our lenders. If there are
future covenant violations, our lenders could declare a default under the applicable credit
facility and, among other actions, refuse to make additional advances, increase our borrowing
costs, further restrict our operations, take possession or control of any asset (including our
cash) and demand the immediate repayment of all amounts outstanding under the credit facility. Any
of these actions could have a material adverse affect on our financial condition and liquidity.
Based on our history of operating losses, we cannot guarantee that we would be able to refinance or
obtain alternative financing.
In addition to the financial covenants, our existing credit facility with Comerica Bank includes a
subjective acceleration clause and requires the Company to maintain a lockbox. Currently, the
Company has the ability to control the funds in the deposit account and determine the amount issued
to pay down the line of credit balance. The bank reserves the right under the security agreement to
request that the indebtedness be on a remittance basis in the future, whether or not an event of
default has occurred. If the bank exercises this right, then the Company would be forced to use its
cash to pay down this indebtedness rather than for other needs, including day-to-day operations,
expansion initiatives or the pay down of debt which accrues interest at a higher rate.
The terms of our credit agreements with various lenders subject us to the risk of foreclosure on
certain property.
Our wholly-owned subsidiary RKDA, Inc. granted Comerica Bank a first priority security interest in
all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of its wholly-owned subsidiary Arcadia Services,
Inc. Arcadia Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries granted Comerica Bank security interests in all of
their assets. Consistent with the terms of the financing agreements with JANA, Vicis and LSP,
PrairieStone Pharmacy, LLC will work to provide these lenders a subordinated security interest in
its assets. If an event of default occurs under the applicable credit agreements, each lender may,
at its option, accelerate the maturity of the debt and exercise its respective right to foreclose
on the issued and outstanding capital stock and/or on all of the assets of Arcadia Services, Inc.
and its subsidiaries, and/or PrairieStone Pharmacy, LLC and its subsidiaries. Any such default and
resulting foreclosure would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and our
ability to continue operations.
In order to fund operations, repay our debt obligations, or pursue our growth strategies, we may
seek additional equity financing, which could result in dilution to our security holders.
On November 6, 2009, the Company entered into definitive agreements with certain institutional
investors to sell an aggregate of 15,857,141 shares of common stock and 7,135,713 warrants to
purchase common stock. The Company expects to raise $10.2 million in net proceeds from this
transaction. We may
continue to raise additional financing through the equity markets to repay debt obligations and to
fund operations. Further, because of the capital requirements needed to pursue our early-stage
pharmacy growth strategies, we may access the public or private equity markets whenever conditions
appear to us to be favorable, even if we do not have an immediate need for additional capital at
that time. We also plan to continue to expand product and service offerings. To the extent we
access the equity markets, the price at which we sell shares may be lower than the current market
prices for our common stock. If we obtain financing through the sale of additional equity or
convertible debt securities, this could result in dilution to our security holders by increasing
the number of shares of outstanding stock. We cannot predict the effect this dilution may have on
the price of our common stock.
To the extent we are unable to generate sufficient cash from operations or raise adequate funds
from the equity or debt markets, we would need to sell assets or modify or abandon our growth
strategy.
We
expect to finalize an equity transaction on or before November 17,
2009 and raise net proceeds of $10.2 million. $2.4 million of the proceeds
will be used to pay off the debt financing received in September 2009. The net proceeds from this
financing
combined with our cash on hand and line of credit availability($3.4 million at September 30, 2009),
may not be adequate to satisfy our cash needs over the long-term. To the extent that we are
unable to generate sufficient cash from operations, or to raise additional funds from the equity or
debt markets, we may be required to sell assets or modify or abandon our growth strategy. Asset
sales and modification or abandonment of our growth strategy could negatively impact our
profitability and financial position, which in turn could negatively impact the price of our common
stock.
43
Table of Contents
Due to our operating losses during recent fiscal years, our stock could be at risk of being
delisted by the NYSE Amex Equities Exchange.
Our stock currently trades on the NYSE Amex Equities Exchange (Amex). The Amex, as a matter of
policy, will consider the suspension of trading in, or removal from listing of any stock when, in
the opinion of the Amex (i) the financial condition and/or operating results of an issuer of stock
listed on the Amex appear to be unsatisfactory, (ii) it appears that the extent of public
distribution or the aggregate market value of the stock has become so reduced as to make further
dealings on the Amex inadvisable, (iii) the issuer has sold or otherwise disposed of its principal
operating assets, or (iv) the issuer has sustained losses which are so substantial in relation to
its overall operations or its existing financial condition has become so impaired that it appears
questionable, in the opinion of the Amex, whether the issuer will be able to continue operations
and/or meet its obligations as they mature. We have sustained net losses and our stock has been
trading at relatively low prices. Delisting of our common stock would adversely affect the price
and liquidity of our common stock.
Changes in federal and state laws that govern our financial relationships with physicians and other
health care providers may impact potential or current referral sources.
We offer certain healthcare-related products and services that are subject to federal and state
laws restricting our relationship with physicians and other healthcare providers. Generally
referred to as anti-kickback laws, these laws prohibit certain direct and indirect payments or
other financial arrangements that are designed to encourage the referral of patients to a
particular medical services provider. In addition, certain financial relationships, including
ownership interests and compensation arrangements, between physicians and providers of designated
health services, such as our Company, to whom those physicians refer patients, are prohibited by
the federal physician self-referral prohibition, known as the Stark Law, and similar state laws.
Violations of these laws could lead to fines or sanctions that could have a material adverse effect
on our business. In addition, changes in healthcare law or new interpretations of existing laws
may have a material impact on our business and results of operations.
We are required to comply with laws governing the transmission of privacy of health information.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, requires us to comply
with standards for the exchange of health information within our Company and with third parties,
such as payors, business associates and consumers. These include standards for common health care
transactions, such as claims information, plan eligibility, payment information, the use of
electronic signatures, unique identifiers for providers, employers, health plans and individuals
and security, privacy and enforcement. New standards and regulations may be adopted governing the
use, disclosure and transmission of health information with which we may be required to comply. We
could be subject to criminal penalties and civil sanctions if we fail to comply with these
standards.
Because we depend on key management, the loss of the services or advice of any of these persons
could have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects.
Our success is dependent on our ability to attract and retain qualified and experienced management
and personnel. We do not presently maintain key person life insurance for any of our personnel.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to attract and retain key personnel in the future,
and our inability to do so could have a material adverse effect on us. Our management team will
need to work together effectively to successfully develop and implement our business strategies and
financial operations. In addition, management will need to devote significant attention and
resources to preserve and strengthen relationships with employees, customers and the investor
community. If our management team is unable to achieve these goals, our ability to grow our
business and successfully meet operational challenges could be impaired.
We do not have long-term agreements or exclusive guaranteed order contracts with our home care,
hospital and healthcare facility clients.
The success of our business depends upon our ability to continually secure new orders from home
care clients, hospitals and other healthcare facilities and to fill those orders with our temporary
healthcare professionals. We do not have long-term agreements or exclusive guaranteed order
contracts with our home care, hospital and healthcare facility clients. We rely on our agencies to
establish and maintain positive relationships with these clients. If we, or our agents, fail to
maintain positive relationships with our home care, hospital and healthcare facility clients, we
may be unable to generate new temporary healthcare professional orders and our business may be
adversely affected. In addition, many of these clients may have devised strategies to reduce the
expenditures on temporary healthcare workers and to limit overall agency utilization. If current
pressures to control agency usage continue and escalate, we will have fewer business opportunities,
which could harm our business.
44
Table of Contents
Sales and profitability in our Pharmacy segment depends on continued demonstration of the
effectiveness of our DailyMed business model, which is in its early stages of broad market
roll-out.
The success of our Pharmacy segment is dependent on the viability and continued demonstration of
the effectiveness of the DailyMed business model, which is in the early stages of market roll-out.
As an innovative, first to market pharmacy care model, DailyMed is challenging the approach of
traditional community based retail pharmacies and others to providing pharmacy products and
services. It is providing a unique opportunity for at risk payers to substantially reduce health
care costs. Market adoption and customer acceptance are key to continued growth in revenues as is
payer adoption of DailyMed as part of efforts to reduce overall health care spend. To date,
competitive responses to DailyMed have yet to evolve. Our ability to grow revenue and receive
compensation for the value-added services we provide are keys to the long-term financial viability
of the DailyMed business model.
Our operations subject us to risk of litigation.
Operating in the homecare industry exposes us to an inherent risk of wrongful death, personal
injury, professional malpractice and other potential claims or litigation brought by our consumers
and employees. These claims may include allegations that we did not properly treat or care for a
consumer or that we failed to follow internal or external procedures that resulted in death or harm
to a consumer.
In addition, regulatory agencies may initiate administrative proceedings alleging violations of
statutes and regulations arising from our services and seek to impose monetary penalties on us. We
could be required to pay substantial amounts to respond to regulatory investigations or, if we do
not prevail, damages or penalties arising from these legal proceedings. We also are subject to
potential lawsuits under the False Claims Act or other federal and state whistleblower statutes
designed to combat fraud and abuse in our industry. These lawsuits can involve significant monetary
awards or penalties which may not be covered by our insurance. If our third-party insurance
coverage and self-insurance reserves are not adequate to cover these claims, it could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Even if we
are successful in our defense, civil lawsuits or regulatory proceedings could distract management
from running our business or irreparably damage our reputation.
A significant decline in sales in our home care and staffing businesses would adversely impact our
revenue, operating income and cash flow and our ability to repay indebtedness and invest in new
products and services.
Our home care and staffing businesses have traditionally accounted for the majority of our revenue,
operating profit and cash flow. Our business strategy is premised upon continued growth in these
segments consistent with underlying market trends. While we believe we are well-positioned to
increase sales in these segments, there can be no assurance that we will do so. Failure to achieve
our sales targets in these market segments would adversely impact our revenue. While operating
expense reductions and other actions would be taken in response to a decline in projected sales,
there is a risk that such a reduction would adversely affect our projected operating income and
cash flow. If this were to occur, we would have less cash available to repay short-term and
long-term indebtedness. We may also have to reduce our investment in other segments of the
business and modify our business strategy.
Sales of certain of our services and products are largely dependent upon payments from governmental
programs and private insurance, and cost containment initiatives by these payers may reduce our
revenues, thereby harming our performance.
In the U.S., healthcare providers and consumers who purchase home care services, prescription drug
products and related products and services generally rely on third party payers, such as Medicare
and Medicaid, to reimburse all or part of the cost of the healthcare product or service. Our
sales and profitability are affected by the efforts of healthcare payors to contain or reduce the
cost of healthcare by lowering reimbursement rates, limiting the scope of covered services, and
negotiating reduced or capitated pricing arrangements. Any changes which lower reimbursement levels
under Medicare, Medicaid or private pay programs, including managed care contracts, could reduce
our future revenue. Furthermore, other changes in these reimbursement programs or in related
regulations could reduce our future revenue. These changes may include modifications in the timing
or processing of payments and other changes intended to limit or decrease the growth of Medicare,
Medicaid or third party expenditures. In addition, our profitability may be adversely affected by
any efforts of our suppliers to shift healthcare costs by increasing the net prices on the products
we obtain from them.
45
Table of Contents
The markets in which we operate are highly competitive and we may be unable to compete successfully
against competitors with greater resources.
We compete in markets that are constantly changing, intensely competitive (given low barriers to
entry), highly fragmented and subject to dynamic economic conditions. Increased competition is
likely to result in price reductions, reduced gross margins, loss of customers, and loss of market
share, any of which could harm our net revenue and results of operations. Many of our competitors
and potential competitors have more capital and marketing and technical resources than we do. These
competitors and potential competitors include large drugstore chains, pharmacy benefits managers,
on-line marketers, national wholesalers, and national and regional distributors. Further, the
Company may face a significant competitive challenge from alliances entered into between and among
its competitors, major HMOs or chain drugstores, as well as from larger competitors created
through industry consolidation. These potential competitors may be able to respond more quickly
than we can to emerging market changes or changes in customer needs. To the extent competitors seek
to gain or retain market share by reducing prices or increasing marketing expenditures, we could
lose revenues or clients. In addition, relatively few barriers to entry exist in local healthcare
markets. As a result, we could encounter increased competition in the future that may increase
pricing pressure and limit our ability to maintain or increase our market share for our mail order
pharmacy and related businesses.
We cannot predict the impact that registration of shares may have on the price of the Companys
shares of common stock.
We cannot predict the impact, if any, that sales of, or the availability for sale of, shares of our
common stock by selling security holders pursuant to a prospectus or otherwise will have on the
market price of our securities prevailing from time to time. The possibility that substantial
amounts of our common stock might enter the public market could adversely affect the prevailing
market price of our common stock and could impair our ability to fund acquisitions or to raise
capital in the future through the sales of securities. Sales of substantial amounts of our
securities, including shares issued upon the exercise of options or warrants, or the perception
that such sales could occur, could adversely effect prevailing market prices for our securities.
The price of our common stock has been, and will likely continue to be, volatile, which could
diminish the ability to recoup an investment, or to earn a return on an investment, in our common
stock.
The market price of our common stock has fluctuated over a wide range, and it is likely that it
will continue to do so in the future. Limited demand for our common stock has resulted in limited
liquidity, and it may be difficult to dispose of our securities. Due to the volatility of the price
of our common stock, an investor may be unable to resell shares of our common stock at or above the
price paid for them, thereby exposing an investor to the risk that he may not recoup an investment
in our common stock or earn a return on such an investment. In the past, securities class action
litigation has been brought against companies following periods of volatility in the market price
of their securities. If we are the target of similar litigation in the future, we would be exposed
to incurring significant litigation costs. This would also divert managements attention and
resources, all of which could substantially harm our business and results of operations.
Resale of our securities by any holder may be limited and affected by state blue-sky laws, which
could adversely affect the price of our securities and the holders investment in our Company.
Under the securities laws of some states, shares of common stock and warrants can be sold in such
states only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In addition, in some states,
warrants and shares of common stock may not be sold unless these shares have been registered or
qualified for sale in the state or an exemption from registration or qualification is available and
is complied with. The requirement of a seller to comply with the requirements of state blue sky
laws may lead to delay or inability of a holder of our securities to dispose of such securities,
thereby causing an adverse effect on the resale price of our securities.
46
Table of Contents
The issuance of our preferred stock could materially impact the market price of our common stock
and the rights of holders of our common stock.
We are authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of serial preferred stock, par value $0.001. Shares of
preferred stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series as may be determined by our
Board of Directors. Except as otherwise provided in our Restated Articles of Incorporation, the
Board of Directors has the authority to fix by resolution adopted before the issuance of any shares
of each particular series of preferred stock, the designation, powers, preferences, and relative
participating, optional and other rights, and the qualifications, limitations, and restrictions of
that series. The issuance of our preferred stock could materially impact the price of our common
stock and the rights of holders of our common stock, including voting rights. The issuance of
preferred stock could decrease the amount of earnings and assets available for distribution to
holders of common stock, and may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in
control of our company, despite such change of control being in the best interest of the holders of
our common stock. The existence of authorized but unissued preferred stock may enable the Board of
Directors to render more difficult or to discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by means of
a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise.
The exercise of common stock warrants and stock options may depress our stock price and may result
in dilution to our common security holders.
Warrants to purchase approximately 4.0 million shares of our common stock were issued and
outstanding as of September 30, 2009, and we expect to issue an
additional 7.1 million warrants in November
2009 upon finalizing a pending equity transaction. Options to purchase approximately 3.5 million shares of our common stock were issued and
outstanding as of September 30, 2009 and another 2.3 million options were granted in October 2009.
The Arcadia Resources, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the Plan), as amended on October 14,
2009, allows for the granting of additional incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options,
stock appreciation rights and restricted shares up to 15 million shares (5.0% of our authorized
shares of common stock as of the date the Plan was approved).
If the market price of our common stock is above the exercise price of some of the outstanding
warrants or options; the holders of those warrants or options may exercise their warrants or
options and sell the common stock acquired upon exercise of such derivative security in the public
market. Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market may
depress the prevailing market price for our common stock and could impair our ability to raise
capital through the future sale of our equity securities. Additionally, if the holders of
outstanding warrants exercise those warrants, our common security holders will suffer dilution. The
exercise price and the number of shares subject to the warrant or option is subject to adjustment
upon stock dividends, splits and combinations, as well as certain anti-dilution adjustments as set
forth in the respective common stock warrants.
We depend on our affiliated agencies and our internal sales force to sell our services and
products, the loss of which could adversely affect our business.
We rely upon our affiliated agencies and our internal sales force to sell our staffing and home
care services and our internal sales force to sell our pharmacy products and services. Arcadia
Services affiliated agencies are owner-operated businesses. The primary responsibilities of
Arcadia Services affiliated agencies include the recruitment and training of field staff employed
by Arcadia Services and generating and maintaining sales to Arcadia Services customers. The
arrangements with affiliated agencies are formalized through a standard contractual agreement,
which state performance requirements of the affiliated agencies. Our employees provide the services
to our customers and the affiliated agents and internal sales force are restricted by
non-competition agreements. In the event of loss of our affiliated agents or internal sales force
personnel, we would recruit new sales and marketing personnel and/or affiliated agents, which could
cause our operating costs to increase and our sales to fall in the interim.
Declines in prescription volumes may negatively affect our net revenues and profitability.
We dispense significant volumes of brand-name and generic drugs as part of our Pharmacy business,
which we expect to be a significant source of our net revenues and profitability. Demand for
prescription drugs can be negatively affected by a number of factors, including increased safety
risk problems, manufacturing issues, regulatory action, and negative press or media coverage.
Certain prescriptions may also be withdrawn by their manufacturer or transition to
over-the-counter products. A reduction in the use of prescription drugs may negatively affect our
volumes, net revenues, profitability and cash flows.
47
Table of Contents
The success of our business depends on maintaining a well-secured pharmacy operation and technology
infrastructure and failure to execute could adversely impact our business.
We depend on our infrastructure, including our information systems, for many aspects of our
business operations, particularly our pharmacy operations. A fundamental requirement for our
business is the secure storage and transmission of personal health information and other
confidential data and we must maintain our business processes and information systems, and the
integrity of our confidential information. Although we have developed systems and processes that
are designed to protect information against security breaches, failure to protect such information
or mitigate any such breaches may adversely affect our operations. Malfunctions in our business
processes, breaches of our information systems or the failure to maintain effective and up-to-date
information systems could disrupt our business operations, result in customer and member disputes,
damage our reputation, expose us to risk of loss or litigation, result in regulatory violations,
increase administrative expenses or lead to other adverse consequences.
Any impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets could negatively impact our results of
operations.
Our goodwill is subject to an impairment test on an annual basis and is also tested whenever events
and circumstances indicate that goodwill may be impaired. Any excess goodwill resulting from the
impairment test must be written off in the period of determination. Intangible assets (other than
goodwill) are generally amortized over the useful life of such assets. In addition, from time to
time, we may acquire or make an investment in a business which will require us to record goodwill
based on the purchase price and the value of the acquired assets. We may subsequently experience
unforeseen issues with such business which adversely affect the anticipated returns of the business
or value of the intangible assets and trigger an evaluation of the recoverability of the recorded
goodwill and intangible assets for such business. Future determinations of significant write-offs
of goodwill or intangible assets as a result of an impairment test or any accelerated amortization
of other intangible assets could have a negative impact on our results of operations and financial
condition. We will complete our annual impairment analysis for goodwill in accordance with the
applicable accounting guidance during our fiscal fourth quarter.
Negative publicity or changes in public perception of our services may adversely affect our ability
to receive referrals, obtain new agreements and renew existing agreements.
Our success in receiving referrals, obtaining new agreements and renewing our existing agreements
depends upon maintaining our reputation as a quality service provider among governmental
authorities, physicians, hospitals, discharge planning departments, case managers, nursing homes,
rehabilitation centers, advocacy groups, consumers and their families, other referral sources and
the public. Negative publicity, changes in public perceptions of our services or government
investigations of our operations could damage our reputation and hinder our ability to receive
referrals, retain agreements or obtain new agreements. Increased government scrutiny may also
contribute to an increase in compliance costs and could discourage consumers from using our
services. Any of these events could have a negative effect on our business, financial condition and
operating results.
Several anti-takeover measures under Nevada law could delay or prevent a change of control, despite
such change of control being in the best interest of the holders of our common stock.
Several anti-takeover measures under Nevada law could delay or prevent a change of control, despite
such change of control being in the best interest of the holders of our common stock. This could
make it more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by means of a merger,
tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise. This could negatively impact the value of an investment
in our common stock, by discouraging a potential suitor who may otherwise be willing to offer a
premium for shares of our common stock.
48
Table of Contents
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the following matters were submitted by us to a vote
of our security holders at the Companys 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on October 14,
2009.
1. | Two Class A Directors were proposed by us and were elected to serve for a three
(3) year term: |
Percentage of | ||||||||||||
Votes Cast in | ||||||||||||
For | Withheld | Favor of: | ||||||||||
Marvin R. Richardson |
150,879,650 | 525,652 | 93.29 | % | ||||||||
John T. Thornton |
150,082,359 | 1,322,943 | 92.79 | % |
2. | An Amendment to our Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of
authorized shares of our common stock was submitted and approved: |
Percentage of | ||||||||||||
Votes Cast in | ||||||||||||
For | Against | Abstain | Favor of: | |||||||||
134,811,067
|
16,278,142 | 316,089 | 93.29 | % |
3. | An Amendment of our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares
available for awards under the Plan was submitted and approved: |
Percentage of | ||||||||||||||||
Broker | Shares Voted in | |||||||||||||||
For | Against | Abstain | Non-Votes | Favor of: | ||||||||||||
88,638,283
|
12,920,927 | 146,786 | 49,699,306 | 54.80 | % |
Item 6. Exhibits.
The Exhibits included as part of this report are listed in the attached Exhibit Index, which is
incorporated herein by this reference.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
November 16, 2009 | By: | /s/ Marvin R. Richardson | ||
Marvin R. Richardson | ||||
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Director |
||||
November 16, 2009 | By: | /s/ Matthew R. Middendorf | ||
Matthew R. Middendorf | ||||
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
49
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
The following documents are filed as part of this report. Exhibits not required for this report
have been omitted. The Companys Commission file number is 000-32935.
Exhibit | ||||
No. | Exhibit Description | |||
31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer required by rule 13a 14(a) or rule 15d
14(a). |
|||
31.2 | Certification of the Principal Accounting and Financial Officer required by rule 13a
14(a) or rule 15d 14(a). |
|||
32.1 | Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
|||
32.2 | Principal Accounting and Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
50