Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORP | c92253exv31w1.htm |
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORP | c92253exv32w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORP | c92253exv31w2.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2009
o | Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Transition Period From _________ to _________.
Commission
File Numbers: 001-34465 and 001-31441
SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION
SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrants as specified in their charters)
Delaware Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
20-1764048 23-2872718 (I.R.S. employer identification number) |
4714 Gettysburg Road, P.O. Box 2034, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17055
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(717) 972-1100
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter periods as the Registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES o NO þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrants have submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the Registrants were required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrants are large accelerated filers, accelerated
filers, non-accelerated filers, or smaller reporting companies. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filers o | Accelerated filers o | Non-accelerated filers þ | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrants are shell companies (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES o NO þ
As of October 31, 2009, Select Medical Holdings Corporation had outstanding 159,714,865 shares
of common stock.
This Form 10-Q is a combined quarterly report being filed separately by two Registrants:
Select Medical Holdings Corporation and Select Medical Corporation. Unless the context indicates
otherwise, any reference in this report to Holdings refers to Select Medical Holdings Corporation
and any reference to Select refers to Select Medical Corporation, the wholly-owned operating
subsidiary of Holdings. References to the Company, we, us, and our refer collectively to
Select Medical Holdings Corporation and Select Medical Corporation.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
8 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
56 | ||||||||
56 | ||||||||
57 | ||||||||
57 | ||||||||
57 | ||||||||
57 | ||||||||
58 | ||||||||
58 | ||||||||
59 | ||||||||
59 | ||||||||
60 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.1 |
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Select Medical Holdings Corporation | Select Medical Corporation | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | September 30, | December 31, | September 30, | |||||||||||||
2008 (1) | 2009 | 2008 (1) | 2009 | |||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||
Current Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 64,260 | $ | 280,492 | $ | 64,260 | $ | 280,492 | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
of $57,052 and $47,343 in 2008 and 2009, respectively |
312,418 | 310,855 | 312,418 | 310,855 | ||||||||||||
Current deferred tax asset |
61,925 | 51,426 | 48,594 | 51,426 | ||||||||||||
Prepaid income taxes |
7,362 | 13,338 | 7,362 | 13,338 | ||||||||||||
Other current assets |
20,897 | 22,152 | 20,897 | 22,152 | ||||||||||||
Total Current Assets |
466,862 | 678,263 | 453,531 | 678,263 | ||||||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
471,065 | 458,897 | 471,065 | 458,897 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill |
1,506,661 | 1,507,223 | 1,506,661 | 1,507,223 | ||||||||||||
Other identifiable intangibles |
74,078 | 67,473 | 74,078 | 67,473 | ||||||||||||
Assets held for sale |
12,542 | 11,342 | 12,542 | 11,342 | ||||||||||||
Other assets |
48,261 | 41,544 | 44,548 | 38,355 | ||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 2,579,469 | $ | 2,764,742 | $ | 2,562,425 | $ | 2,761,553 | ||||||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||
Current Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Bank overdrafts |
$ | 21,130 | $ | | $ | 21,130 | $ | | ||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt and notes payable |
9,046 | 141,667 | 9,046 | 141,667 | ||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
72,496 | 64,103 | 72,496 | 64,103 | ||||||||||||
Accrued payroll |
66,380 | 64,991 | 66,380 | 64,991 | ||||||||||||
Accrued vacation |
37,109 | 38,082 | 37,109 | 38,082 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest |
37,032 | 15,293 | 25,444 | 12,345 | ||||||||||||
Accrued restructuring |
8,108 | 4,740 | 8,108 | 4,740 | ||||||||||||
Accrued other |
91,482 | 115,846 | 107,982 | 115,846 | ||||||||||||
Due to third party payors |
5,709 | 2,179 | 5,709 | 2,179 | ||||||||||||
Total Current Liabilities |
348,492 | 446,901 | 353,404 | 443,953 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
1,770,879 | 1,521,394 | 1,460,276 | 1,217,252 | ||||||||||||
Non-current deferred tax liability |
42,918 | 54,733 | 42,918 | 54,733 | ||||||||||||
Other non-current liabilities |
67,709 | 60,648 | 67,709 | 60,648 | ||||||||||||
Total Liabilities |
2,229,998 | 2,083,676 | 1,924,307 | 1,776,586 | ||||||||||||
Commitments and Contingencies |
||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock Authorized shares (liquidation preference is $515,872 in 2008) |
515,872 | | | | ||||||||||||
Stockholders Equity: |
||||||||||||||||
Common stock
of Holdings, $0.001 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 61,466,000
shares and
156,093,000 shares issued and outstanding in 2008 and 2009, respectively |
61 | 156 | | | ||||||||||||
Common stock
of Select, $0.01 par value, 100 shares issued and outstanding |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Capital in excess of par |
(289,238 | ) | 544,772 | 481,094 | 786,304 | |||||||||||
Retained earnings |
128,185 | 139,183 | 160,657 | 201,708 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(13,212 | ) | (10,680 | ) | (11,436 | ) | (10,680 | ) | ||||||||
Total Select Medical Holdings Corporation and Select Medical Corporation Stockholders Equity |
(174,204 | ) | 673,431 | 630,315 | 977,332 | |||||||||||
Non-controlling interest |
7,803 | 7,635 | 7,803 | 7,635 | ||||||||||||
Total Equity |
(166,401 | ) | 681,066 | 638,118 | 984,967 | |||||||||||
Total Liabilities and Equity |
$ | 2,579,469 | $ | 2,764,742 | $ | 2,562,425 | $ | 2,761,553 | ||||||||
(1) | Adjusted for the adoption of an amendment issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board in December 2007 to ASC topic 810, Consolidation. See Note 2, Accounting Policies Recent Accounting Pronouncements, for additional information. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.
3
Table of Contents
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Select Medical Holdings Corporation | Select Medical Corporation | |||||||||||||||
For the Quarter Ended September 30, | For the Quarter Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 (1) (2) | 2009 | 2008 (1) | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net operating revenues |
$ | 519,179 | $ | 545,621 | $ | 519,179 | $ | 545,621 | ||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of services |
441,395 | 448,702 | 441,395 | 448,702 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
11,538 | 34,618 | 11,538 | 34,618 | ||||||||||||
Bad debt expense |
12,240 | 11,720 | 12,240 | 11,720 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
17,848 | 17,676 | 17,848 | 17,676 | ||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
483,021 | 512,716 | 483,021 | 512,716 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
36,158 | 32,905 | 36,158 | 32,905 | ||||||||||||
Other income and expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Gain on early retirement of debt |
| 1,129 | | | ||||||||||||
Other income |
| | 1,322 | 2,215 | ||||||||||||
Interest income |
93 | 2 | 93 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(36,153 | ) | (33,451 | ) | (27,420 | ) | (25,114 | ) | ||||||||
Income from operations before income taxes |
98 | 585 | 10,153 | 10,008 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
(111 | ) | (804 | ) | 3,408 | 2,494 | ||||||||||
Net income |
209 | 1,389 | 6,745 | 7,514 | ||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests |
1,032 | 806 | 1,032 | 806 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Select Medical
Holdings Corporation
and Select Medical Corporation |
(823 | ) | 583 | $ | 5,713 | $ | 6,708 | |||||||||
Less: Preferred dividends |
6,290 | 6,667 | ||||||||||||||
Net loss available to common stockholders |
$ | (7,113 | ) | $ | (6,084 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||||||||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) |
(1) | Adjusted for the adoption of an amendment issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board in December 2007 to ASC topic 810, Consolidation. See Note 2, Accounting Policies Recent Accounting Pronouncements, for additional information. | |
(2) | Adjusted for the clarification by the Financial Accounting Standards Board that stated share based payment awards that have not vested meet the definition of a participating security provided the right to receive the dividend is non-forfeitable and non-contingent. See Note 11 for additional information. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.
4
Table of Contents
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Select Medical Holdings Corporation | Select Medical Corporation | |||||||||||||||
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 (1) (2) | 2009 | 2008 (1) | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net operating revenues |
$ | 1,606,263 | $ | 1,666,328 | $ | 1,606,263 | $ | 1,666,328 | ||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of services |
1,343,022 | 1,353,107 | 1,343,022 | 1,353,107 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
35,843 | 60,278 | 35,843 | 60,278 | ||||||||||||
Bad debt expense |
35,300 | 33,678 | 35,300 | 33,678 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
53,175 | 53,346 | 53,175 | 53,346 | ||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
1,467,340 | 1,500,409 | 1,467,340 | 1,500,409 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
138,923 | 165,919 | 138,923 | 165,919 | ||||||||||||
Other income and expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Gain on early retirement of debt |
| 16,445 | | 15,316 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
| | (1,180 | ) | 3,836 | |||||||||||
Interest income |
275 | 82 | 275 | 82 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(109,603 | ) | (101,781 | ) | (83,428 | ) | (75,936 | ) | ||||||||
Income from operations before income taxes |
29,595 | 80,665 | 54,590 | 109,217 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
13,862 | 33,076 | 22,610 | 43,069 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
15,733 | 47,589 | 31,980 | 66,148 | ||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests |
2,103 | 2,218 | 2,103 | 2,218 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Select Medical Holdings Corporation
and Select Medical Corporation |
13,630 | 45,371 | $ | 29,877 | $ | 63,930 | ||||||||||
Less: Preferred dividends |
18,569 | 19,537 | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders |
$ | (4,939 | ) | $ | 25,834 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.07 | ) | $ | 0.38 | |||||||||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.07 | ) | $ | 0.37 |
(1) | Adjusted for the adoption of an amendment issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board in December 2007 to ASC topic 810, Consolidation. See Note 2, Accounting Policies Recent Accounting Pronouncements, for additional information. | |
(2) | Adjusted for the clarification by the Financial Accounting Standards Board that stated share based payment awards that have not vested meet the definition of a participating security provided the right to receive the dividend is non-forfeitable and non-contingent. See Note 11 for additional information. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.
5
Table of Contents
Select Medical Holdings Corporation
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
Select Medical Holdings Corporation Stockholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Accumulated Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive | Common | Stock Par | Capital in | Retained | Comprehensive | Non-controlling | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Income | Stock Issued | Value | Excess of Par | Earnings | Income (Loss) | Interests | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008 (1) |
$ | (166,401 | ) | 61,466 | $ | 61 | $ | (289,238 | ) | $ | 128,185 | $ | (13,212 | ) | $ | 7,803 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
47,589 | $ | 47,589 | 45,371 | 2,218 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap, net of tax |
2,532 | 2,532 | 2,532 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ | 50,121 | $ | 50,121 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock in connection with initial public
offering, net of issuance costs |
279,124 | 30,000 | 30 | 279,094 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of preferred stock |
535,407 | 64,277 | 65 | 535,342 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deemed dividend on conversion of preferred stock |
| 14,836 | (14,836 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance and vesting of restricted stock |
4,697 | 364 | | 4,697 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
24 | 2 | | 24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option expense |
98 | 98 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common shares |
(81 | ) | (16 | ) | | (81 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to non-controlling interests |
(2,486 | ) | (2,486 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity contribution from non-controlling interests |
100 | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accretion of dividends on preferred stock |
(19,537 | ) | (19,537 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
$ | 681,066 | 156,093 | $ | 156 | $ | 544,772 | $ | 139,183 | $ | (10,680 | ) | $ | 7,635 | ||||||||||||||||||
Select Medical Corporation
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
Select Medical Corporation Stockholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Accumulated Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive | Common | Stock Par | Capital in | Retained | Comprehensive | Non-controlling | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Income | Stock Issued | Value | Excess of Par | Earnings | Income (Loss) | Interests | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008 (1) |
$ | 638,118 | | $ | | $ | 481,094 | $ | 160,657 | $ | (11,436 | ) | $ | 7,803 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
66,148 | $ | 66,148 | 63,930 | 2,218 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap, net of tax |
756 | 756 | 756 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ | 66,904 | $ | 66,904 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal tax benefit of losses contributed by Holdings |
21,267 | 21,267 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional investment by Holdings |
279,148 | 279,148 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Settlement of dividends paid to Holdings |
(22,879 | ) | (22,879 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to non-controlling interests |
(2,486 | ) | (2,486 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity contribution from non-controlling interests |
100 | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contribution related to restricted stock awards and stock option
issuances by Holdings |
4,795 | 4,795 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
$ | 984,967 | | $ | | $ | 786,304 | $ | 201,708 | $ | (10,680 | ) | $ | 7,635 | ||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Adjusted for the adoption of an amendment issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board in December 2007 to ASC topic 810, Consolidation. See Note 2, Accounting Policies Recent Accounting Pronouncements, for additional information. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.
6
Table of Contents
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
Select Medical Holdings Corporation | Select Medical Corporation | |||||||||||||||
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 (1) | 2009 | 2008 (1) | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 15,733 | $ | 47,589 | $ | 31,980 | $ | 66,148 | ||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
53,175 | 53,346 | 53,175 | 53,346 | ||||||||||||
Provision for bad debts |
35,300 | 33,678 | 35,300 | 33,678 | ||||||||||||
Gain on early retirement of debt |
| (16,445 | ) | | (15,316 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss (gain) from disposal of assets |
(316 | ) | 550 | (316 | ) | 550 | ||||||||||
Non-cash loss (gain) from interest rate swaps |
| | 1,180 | (3,836 | ) | |||||||||||
Non-cash stock compensation expense |
1,697 | 4,795 | 1,697 | 4,795 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of debt discount |
1,101 | 1,239 | | | ||||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of
effects from acquisition of businesses: |
||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(74,975 | ) | (32,033 | ) | (74,975 | ) | (32,033 | ) | ||||||||
Other current assets |
5,465 | (982 | ) | 5,465 | (982 | ) | ||||||||||
Other assets |
11,375 | 4,018 | 10,959 | 3,589 | ||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
(4,917 | ) | (8,366 | ) | (4,917 | ) | (8,366 | ) | ||||||||
Due to third-party payors |
(9,328 | ) | (3,530 | ) | (9,328 | ) | (3,530 | ) | ||||||||
Accrued expenses |
(9,541 | ) | (1,024 | ) | (1,391 | ) | 7,615 | |||||||||
Income and deferred taxes |
9,204 | 10,612 | 17,950 | 20,608 | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
33,973 | 93,447 | 66,779 | 126,266 | ||||||||||||
Investing activities |
||||||||||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(35,770 | ) | (35,250 | ) | (35,770 | ) | (35,250 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of business units |
1,851 | | 1,851 | | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of property |
743 | 1,341 | 743 | 1,341 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired |
(7,402 | ) | (381 | ) | (7,402 | ) | (381 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(40,578 | ) | (34,290 | ) | (40,578 | ) | (34,290 | ) | ||||||||
Financing activities |
||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from initial public offering, net of fees |
| 282,000 | | | ||||||||||||
Equity investment by Holdings |
| | 90 | 282,024 | ||||||||||||
Payment of initial public offering costs |
| (584 | ) | | (584 | ) | ||||||||||
Borrowings on revolving credit facility |
387,000 | 193,000 | 387,000 | 193,000 | ||||||||||||
Payments on revolving credit facility |
(357,000 | ) | (253,000 | ) | (357,000 | ) | (253,000 | ) | ||||||||
Payment on credit facility term loan |
(5,100 | ) | (5,033 | ) | (5,100 | ) | (5,033 | ) | ||||||||
Repurchase of 7 5/8% senior subordinated notes |
| (30,114 | ) | | (30,114 | ) | ||||||||||
Repurchase of senior floating rate notes |
| (6,468 | ) | | | |||||||||||
Borrowings of other debt |
| 5,184 | | 5,184 | ||||||||||||
Principal payments on seller and other debt |
(4,015 | ) | (5,738 | ) | (4,015 | ) | (5,738 | ) | ||||||||
Dividends paid to Holdings |
| | (33,418 | ) | (39,367 | ) | ||||||||||
Repurchase of common and preferred stock |
(612 | ) | (80 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
90 | 24 | | | ||||||||||||
Repayment of bank overdrafts |
(7,217 | ) | (21,130 | ) | (7,217 | ) | (21,130 | ) | ||||||||
Equity contribution and loans from non-controlling interests |
| 1,500 | | 1,500 | ||||||||||||
Distributions to non-controlling interests |
(1,703 | ) | (2,486 | ) | (1,703 | ) | (2,486 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
11,443 | 157,075 | (21,363 | ) | 124,256 | |||||||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
4,838 | 216,232 | 4,838 | 216,232 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
4,529 | 64,260 | 4,529 | 64,260 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 9,367 | $ | 280,492 | $ | 9,367 | $ | 280,492 | ||||||||
Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
||||||||||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 123,285 | $ | 115,901 | $ | 90,404 | $ | 83,082 | ||||||||
Cash paid for taxes |
$ | 4,704 | $ | 22,441 | $ | 4,704 | $ | 22,441 |
(1) | Adjusted for the adoption of an amendment issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board in December 2007 to ASC topic 810, Consolidation. See Note 2, Accounting Policies Recent Accounting Pronouncements, for additional information. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.
7
Table of Contents
SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATION
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. Basis of Presentation
Select Medical Corporation (Select) was formed in December 1996 and commenced operations
during February 1997 upon the completion of its first acquisition. Select Medical Holdings
Corporation (Holdings) was formed in October 2004 for the purpose of effecting a leveraged buyout
of Select, which was a publicly traded entity. Holdings was originally owned by an investor group
that includes Welsh, Carson, Anderson, & Stowe, IX, LP (Welsh Carson), Thoma Cressey Bravo
(Thoma Cressey) and members of the Companys senior management. On February 24, 2005, Select
Medical Corporation (Select) merged with a subsidiary of Select Medical Holdings Corporation
(Holdings), formerly known as EGL Holding Company, and became a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Holdings (Merger). On September 30, 2009 Holdings completed its initial public offering of
common stock at a price to the public of $10.00 per share. Refer to Note 8, Initial Public
Offering, for additional information. Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) require
that any amounts recorded or incurred (such as goodwill and compensation expense) by the parent as
a result of the Merger or for the benefit of the subsidiary be pushed down and recorded in
Selects consolidated financial statements. Holdings and Select and their subsidiaries are
collectively referred to as the Company. The consolidated financial statements of Holdings
include the accounts of its wholly-owned subsidiary Select. Holdings conducts substantially all of
its business through Select and its subsidiaries.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company as of September 30,
2009 and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 have been prepared
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. In the opinion of management, such
information contains all adjustments, which are normal and recurring in nature, necessary for a
fair statement of the financial position, results of operations and cash flow for such periods.
All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The results of
operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of
the results to be expected for the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2009.
Certain information and disclosures normally included in the notes to consolidated financial
statements have been condensed or omitted consistent with the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC), although the Company believes the disclosure is
adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2008 available on the Companys
website: www.selectmedicalcorp.com under the Investor Relations section of the website. Please
note that none of the information on the Companys website is incorporated by reference into this
report.
2. Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates, in some cases materially.
8
Table of Contents
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update 2009-05, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) Measuring Liabilities at
Fair Value (Update 2009-05). Update 2009-05 provides clarification that in circumstances in which
a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity
is required to measure fair value of such liability using one or more of the techniques prescribed
by the update. Update 2009-05 is effective for the first annual or interim period beginning after
the issuance of this update. The adoption of Update 2009-05 is not anticipated to have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) topic
105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The amendment stipulates the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification is the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be
applied by nongovernmental entities. The amendment was effective for financial statements issued
for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of this amendment did
not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, FASB issued an amendment to ASC topic 810, Consolidation. The amendment
changes how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is
not controlled through voting or similar rights should be consolidated. The amendment will require
a reporting entity to provide additional disclosures about its involvement with variable interest
entities and any significant changes in risk exposure related to that involvement. The amendment
is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The
adoption of the amendment is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC topic 860, Transfers and Servicing. The
amendment will require additional disclosure about the transfers of financial assets, including
securitization transactions, and additional disclosure in cases where entities have continuing
exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. The amendment eliminates the
concept of qualifying special-purpose entity and changes the requirements for derecognizing
financial assets. The amendment is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning
after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a material impact
on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC topic 855, Subsequent Events. The amendment
provides general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance
sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The amendment
sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity
should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in
the financial statements. The amendment also sets forth the circumstances under which an entity
should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial
statements. Furthermore, this amendment identifies the disclosures that an entity should make
about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The Company adopted this
amendment during the second quarter of 2009 and evaluated subsequent
events through November 13, 2009, the issuance date of this report.
In April 2009, FASB issued an amendment to ASC topic 805, Business Combinations. This
amendment changes the provisions for the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent
measurement and accounting and disclosures for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in
business combinations. The amendment eliminates the distinction between contractual and
non-contractual contingencies, including the initial recognition and measurement criteria. The
amendment is effective for contingent assets and contingent
liabilities acquired in business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after
the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The
adoption of this amendment did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
9
Table of Contents
In April 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures. This amendment provides additional guidance for estimating fair value when the volume
and level of activity for the asset or liability have decreased significantly. The amendment also
provides guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. The
amendment was effective for the Companys interim period ending on June 30, 2009. The adoption of
this amendment did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted an amendment issued by the FASB in December 2007 to
ASC topic 810, Consolidation. Upon adoption of this amendment, minority interest is now referred
to as non-controlling interest and has been reclassified from the mezzanine section of the balance
sheet to the equity section. The balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 has been revised to show
this change in presentation. In addition, non-controlling interest is now deducted from net income
to obtain net income attributable to each of Holdings and Select.
3. Intangible Assets
The Companys intangible assets consist of the following:
As of September 30, 2009 | ||||||||
Gross Carrying | Accumulated | |||||||
Amount | Amortization | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Amortized intangible assets |
||||||||
Contract therapy relationships |
$ | 20,456 | $ | (18,751 | ) | |||
Non-compete agreements |
25,909 | (19,513 | ) | |||||
Total |
$ | 46,365 | $ | (38,264 | ) | |||
Indefinite-lived intangible assets |
||||||||
Goodwill |
$ | 1,507,223 | ||||||
Trademarks |
47,858 | |||||||
Certificates of need |
10,175 | |||||||
Accreditations |
1,339 | |||||||
Total |
$ | 1,566,595 | ||||||
The Companys accreditations and trademarks have renewal terms. The costs to renew these
intangibles are expensed as incurred. At September 30, 2009, the accreditations and trademarks
have a weighted average time until the next renewal of 1.5 years and 5.0 years, respectively.
10
Table of Contents
Amortization expense for the Companys intangible assets with finite lives follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization expense |
$ | 2,208 | $ | 2,207 | $ | 6,623 | $ | 6,623 |
Amortization expense for the Companys intangible assets primarily relates to the amortization
of the value associated with the non-compete agreements entered into in connection with the
acquisitions of the outpatient rehabilitation division of HealthSouth Corporation (the Division),
Kessler Rehabilitation Corporation and SemperCare Inc. and the value assigned to the Companys
contract therapy relationships. The useful lives of the Divisions non-compete, Kessler
non-compete, SemperCare non-compete and the Companys contract therapy relationships are
approximately five, six, seven and five years, respectively.
Amortization expense related to these intangible assets for each of the next five years
commencing January 1, 2009 is approximately as follows (in thousands):
2009 |
$ | 8,831 | ||
2010 |
4,247 | |||
2011 |
1,306 | |||
2012 |
340 | |||
2013 |
0 |
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the Companys reportable segments for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 are as follows:
Specialty | Outpatient | |||||||||||
Hospitals | Rehabilitation | Total | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
$ | 1,227,848 | $ | 278,813 | $ | 1,506,661 | ||||||
Goodwill acquired during year |
| 562 | 562 | |||||||||
Balance as of September 30,
2009 |
$ | 1,227,848 | $ | 279,375 | $ | 1,507,223 | ||||||
4. Restructuring Reserves
In connection with the acquisition of the outpatient rehabilitation division of HealthSouth
Corporation, the Company recorded a liability of $18.7 million in 2007 for business restructuring
which was accounted for as additional purchase price. This reserve primarily included costs
associated with workforce reductions and lease termination costs in accordance with the Companys
restructuring plan.
11
Table of Contents
The following summarizes the Companys restructuring activity:
Lease | ||||||||||||||||
Termination | ||||||||||||||||
Costs | Severance | Other | Total | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2008 |
$ | 7,047 | $ | 992 | $ | 69 | $ | 8,108 | ||||||||
Amounts paid in 2009 |
(2,925 | ) | (443 | ) | | (3,368 | ) | |||||||||
Revision of estimate |
565 | (496 | ) | (69 | ) | | ||||||||||
September 30, 2009 |
$ | 4,687 | $ | 53 | $ | | $ | 4,740 | ||||||||
The Company expects to pay out the remaining lease termination costs through 2016 and
severance costs in 2009.
5. Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Facility
On August 5, 2009 Select entered into an Amendment No. 3 (Amendment No. 3) to its senior
secured credit facility. Amendment No. 3 extended the maturity of $384.5 million principal amount
of Tranche B term loans from February 24, 2012 to August 22, 2014, and made related technical
changes to the senior secured credit facility. Holders of Tranche B term loans that extended the
maturity of their Tranche B term loans now hold Tranche B-1 term loans that mature on August 22,
2014, and holders of Tranche B term loans that did not extend the maturity of their Tranche B term
loans continue to hold Tranche B term loans that mature on February 24, 2012. The applicable
margin percentage for the Tranche B-1 term loans under the senior secured credit facility is 3.75%
for adjusted LIBOR loans and 2.75% for alternate base rate loans. Under the terms of Amendment No.
3, if, prior to August 5, 2011, the senior secured credit facility is amended to reduce the
applicable margin percentage for the Tranche B-1 term loans, then Select will be required to pay a
fee in an amount equal to 1% of the outstanding Tranche B-1 term loans held by those holders of
Tranche B-1 term loans that agree to amend the senior secured credit facility to reduce the
applicable margin percentage. In addition, if, prior to August 5, 2011, Select makes any prepayment
of Tranche B-1 term loans with proceeds of any term loan indebtedness, then Select will be required
to pay a fee to holders of Tranche B-1 term loans in an amount equal to 1% of the outstanding
Tranche B-1 term loans that are being prepaid.
6. Fair Value
Fair Value Measurements
The Company measures its interest rate swaps at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company
determines the fair value of its interest rate swaps based on financial models that consider
current and future market interest rates and adjustments for non-performance risk. The Company
considers those inputs utilized in the valuation process to be Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy is defined as inputs other than quoted prices that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices
for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar
assets or liabilities in markets that are not active. The fair value of the Companys interest
rate swaps was a liability of $18.5 million at September 30, 2009 of which $17.8 million was
reported as a current liability in accrued other and $0.7 million was reported in other long-term
liabilities.
12
Table of Contents
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value because of the
short-term maturity of these instruments. The carrying amount of Selects senior secured credit
facility was $741.5 million at September 30, 2009 and the estimated fair value of the senior
secured credit facility was $721.8 million at September 30, 2009. At September 30, 2009 the
carrying value of the 7 5/8% senior subordinated notes was $611.5 million and the estimated fair value
was $574.8 million. At September 30, 2009 the carrying value of the senior floating rate notes
was $167.3 million and the estimated fair value was $156.0 million. The Company based the
estimated the fair value for its senior secured credit facility, 7 5/8% senior subordinated notes and
senior floating rate notes on quotes from financial institutions.
Interest Rate Swaps
The Company is exposed to the impact of interest rate changes. The Companys objective is to
manage the impact of the interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows. On June 13, 2005,
Select entered into two interest rate swap agreements to hedge Selects interest rate risk for a
portion of its term loans under its senior secured credit facility. The effective date of the swap
transactions was August 22, 2005. The swaps are designated as cash flow hedges of forecasted LIBOR
based variable rate interest payments. The notional amount of the interest rate swaps is $200.0
million, and the underlying variable rate debt is associated with Selects senior secured credit
facility. The variable interest rate of the debt was 3.4% and the fixed rate of the swap was 7.3%
at September 30, 2009. The swaps are for a period of five years, with quarterly resets on February
22, May 22, August 22 and November 22 of each year.
On March 8, 2007, Select entered into an additional interest rate swap agreement to hedge
Selects interest rate risk for a portion of its term loans under its senior secured credit
facility. The effective date of the swap transaction was May 22, 2007. The swap is designated as
a cash flow hedge of forecasted LIBOR based variable rate interest payments. The notional amount
of the interest rate swap is $200.0 million, and the underlying variable rate debt is associated
with Selects senior secured credit facility. The variable interest rate of the debt was 3.4% and
the fixed rate of the swap was 7.9% at September 30, 2009. The swap is for a period of three
years, with quarterly resets on February 22, May 22, August 22 and November 22 of each year.
On November 16, 2007, Select entered into an additional interest rate swap agreement to hedge
Selects interest rate risk for a portion of its term loans under its senior secured credit
facility. The effective date of the swap transaction was November 23, 2007. The swap is
designated as a cash flow hedge of forecasted LIBOR based variable rate interest payments. The
notional amount of the interest rate swap is $100.0 million, and the underlying variable rate debt
is associated with Selects senior secured credit facility. The variable interest rate of the debt
was 3.4% and the fixed rate of the swap was 7.3% at September 30, 2009. The swap is for a period
of three years, with quarterly resets on February 22, May 22, August 22 and November 22 of each
year.
The interest rate swaps have been designated as hedges and qualify as effective hedges, except
for the swap that was associated with Holdings $175.0 million senior floating rate notes due 2015
as it relates to Selects financial statements. This interest rate swap, which matured in
September 2009, did not qualify as an effective hedge as the cash flow stream being hedged related
to the amount of dividend payments to Holdings necessary to fund interest payments on Holdings
$175.0 million senior floating rate notes. This resulted in a gain of $1.3 million and $2.2
million being recognized in the other income and expense section of Selects consolidated statement
of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively, and a loss of
$1.2 million and a gain of $3.8 million being recognized for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 and 2009, respectively. On the consolidated statements of Holdings, this interest rate swap
qualified as an effective hedge. See also Note 7, Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.
13
Table of Contents
7. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Holdings
Included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009
were cumulative losses of $13.2 million (net of tax) and $10.7 million (net of tax), respectively,
on interest rate swaps accounted for as cash flow hedges.
Select
Included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009
were cumulative losses of $11.4 million (net of tax) and $10.7 million (net of tax), respectively,
on interest rate swaps accounted for as cash flow hedges.
8. Initial Public Offering
On September 30, 2009, Holdings completed its initial public offering of common stock at a
price to the public of $10.00 per share. Holdings sold 30,000,000 shares in the offering. The
total net proceeds to Holdings from the offering after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions and offering expenses were approximately $279.1 million. The Company used the net
proceeds from the offering to repay indebtedness and to make payments to its executive officers
under our Long Term Cash Incentive Plan, and will use the remaining net proceeds from the offering
to repay additional indebtedness or for general corporate purposes. The initial public offering of
common stock triggered the mandatory prepayment obligation under the senior secured credit facility
in the amount of 50% of the net proceeds received in the offering. The closing and receipt of cash
occurred on September 30, 2009, however, the repayments of indebtedness and payment under the Long
Term Cash Incentive Plan did not occur until October. As a result, the Company has reported a
significant amount of cash on its September 30, 2009 balance sheet and has reflected the mandatory
repayment under the credit facility as a current portion of long term debt.
On October 28, 2009, the underwriters purchased an additional 3,602,700 shares pursuant to
their over-allotment option at a price to the public of $10.00 per share. The total net proceeds
to Holdings from the exercise of the over-allotment option were approximately $33.9 million. A
portion of the net proceeds from the exercise of the over-allotment option were used to repay
indebtedness, including a mandatory prepayment obligation under the senior secured
credit facility in the amount of 50% of the net proceeds, and any remaining proceeds will be used
to repay additional indebtedness or for general corporate purposes.
9. Stockholders Equity
Participating Preferred Stock
Upon completion of Holdings initial public offering, Holdings participating preferred stock
converted into a total of 64,276,974 common shares. Each share of preferred stock converted into a
number of shares of common stock determined by:
| dividing the original cost of a share of the preferred stock ($26.90 per share of preferred stock) plus all accrued and unpaid dividends through September 30, 2009 thereon less the amount of any previously declared and paid special dividends, or the accreted value of such preferred stock, by the initial public offering price per share net of any expenses incurred and underwriting commissions or concessions paid or allowed in connection with the offering; plus | |
| .30 shares of common stock for each share of preferred stock owned. |
14
Table of Contents
Common Stock
On September 25, 2009 Holdings effected a 1 for .30 reverse stock split of its common stock.
Accordingly all common issued and outstanding share and per share information in this report has
been retroactively restated to reflect the effects of this reverse stock split.
10. Segment Information
The Companys segments consist of (i) specialty hospitals and (ii) outpatient rehabilitation.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of
significant accounting policies. All other primarily includes the Companys general and
administrative services. The Company evaluates performance of the segments based on Adjusted
EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income before interest, income taxes, depreciation and
amortization, gain on early retirement of debt, other income (expense), stock compensation expense,
long term incentive compensation and non-controlling interest.
The following tables summarize selected financial data for the Companys reportable segments
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009. The segment results of Holdings
are identical to those of Select with the exception of total assets:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Specialty | Outpatient | |||||||||||||||
Hospitals | Rehabilitation | All Other | Total | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net operating revenue |
$ | 358,838 | $ | 160,303 | $ | 38 | $ | 519,179 | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
49,137 | 16,405 | (11,031 | ) | 54,511 | |||||||||||
Total assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Select Medical Corporation |
1,900,485 | 502,943 | 105,881 | 2,509,309 | ||||||||||||
Select Medical Holdings Corporation |
1,900,485 | 502,943 | 109,733 | 2,513,161 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
5,997 | 3,235 | 431 | 9,663 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Specialty | Outpatient | |||||||||||||||
Hospitals | Rehabilitation | All Other | Total | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net operating revenue |
$ | 376,859 | $ | 168,751 | $ | 11 | $ | 545,621 | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
64,381 | 20,898 | (12,236 | ) | 73,043 | |||||||||||
Total assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Select Medical Corporation |
1,898,494 | 484,703 | 378,356 | 2,761,553 | ||||||||||||
Select Medical Holdings
Corporation |
1,898,494 | 484,703 | 381,545 | 2,764,742 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
12,371 | 1,566 | 332 | 14,269 |
15
Table of Contents
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Specialty | Outpatient | |||||||||||||||
Hospitals | Rehabilitation | All Other | Total | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net operating revenue |
$ | 1,104,731 | $ | 501,375 | $ | 157 | $ | 1,606,263 | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
167,617 | 60,248 | (34,070 | ) | 193,795 | |||||||||||
Total assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Select Medical Corporation |
1,900,485 | 502,943 | 105,881 | 2,509,309 | ||||||||||||
Select Medical Holdings
Corporation |
1,900,485 | 502,943 | 109,733 | 2,513,161 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
23,385 | 10,048 | 2,337 | 35,770 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Specialty | Outpatient | |||||||||||||||
Hospitals | Rehabilitation | All Other | Total | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net operating revenue |
$ | 1,156,422 | $ | 509,760 | $ | 146 | $ | 1,666,328 | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
212,122 | 67,476 | (37,277 | ) | 242,321 | |||||||||||
Total assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Select Medical Corporation |
1,898,494 | 484,703 | 378,356 | 2,761,553 | ||||||||||||
Select Medical Holdings Corporation |
1,898,494 | 484,703 | 381,545 | 2,764,742 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
27,748 | 6,575 | 927 | 35,250 |
A reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to income from operations before income taxes is as
follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Specialty | Outpatient | |||||||||||||||||||
Hospitals | Rehabilitation | All Other | ||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 49,137 | $ | 16,405 | $ | (11,031 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(10,756 | ) | (6,193 | ) | (899 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Stock compensation expense |
| | (505 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Select Medical | ||||||||||||||||||||
Holdings | Select Medical | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporation | Corporation | |||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
$ | 38,381 | $ | 10,212 | $ | (12,435 | ) | $ | 36,158 | $ | 36,158 | |||||||||
Other income |
| 1,322 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(36,060 | ) | (27,327 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income from operations before
income taxes |
$ | 98 | $ | 10,153 | ||||||||||||||||
16
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Specialty | Outpatient | |||||||||||||||||||
Hospitals | Rehabilitation | All Other | ||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 64,381 | $ | 20,898 | $ | (12,236 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(10,485 | ) | (6,282 | ) | (909 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Long term incentive compensation |
| | (18,261 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock compensation expense |
| | (4,201 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Select Medical | ||||||||||||||||||||
Holdings |
Select Medical | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporation | Corporation | |||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
$ | 53,896 | $ | 14,616 | $ | (35,607 | ) | $ | 32,905 | $ | 32,905 | |||||||||
Gain on early retirement of debt |
1,129 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
| 2,215 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(33,449 | ) | (25,112 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income from operations before
income taxes |
$ | 585 | $ | 10,008 | ||||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Specialty | Outpatient | |||||||||||||||||||
Hospitals | Rehabilitation | All Other | ||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 167,617 | $ | 60,248 | $ | (34,070 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(32,632 | ) | (17,894 | ) | (2,649 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Stock compensation expense |
| | (1,697 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Select Medical | ||||||||||||||||||||
Holdings |
Select Medical | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporation | Corporation | |||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
$ | 134,985 | $ | 42,354 | $ | (38,416 | ) | $ | 138,923 | $ | 138,923 | |||||||||
Other expense |
| (1,180 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(109,328 | ) | (83,153 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income from operations before
income taxes |
$ | 29,595 | $ | 54,590 | ||||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Specialty | Outpatient | |||||||||||||||||||
Hospitals | Rehabilitation | All Other | ||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 212,122 | $ | 67,476 | $ | (37,277 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(32,022 | ) | (18,679 | ) | (2,645 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Long term incentive compensation |
| | (18,261 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock compensation expense |
| | (4,795 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Select Medical | ||||||||||||||||||||
Holdings | Select Medical | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporation | Corporation | |||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
$ | 180,100 | $ | 48,797 | $ | (62,978 | ) | $ | 165,919 | $ | 165,919 | |||||||||
Gain on early retirement of debt |
16,445 | 15,316 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
| 3,836 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(101,699 | ) | (75,854 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income from operations before
income taxes |
$ | 80,665 | $ | 109,217 | ||||||||||||||||
17
Table of Contents
11. Net Income (Loss) per Share
The Company applies the two-class method for calculating and presenting income (loss) per
common share. The two-class method is an earnings (loss) allocation formula that determines
earnings (loss) per share for each class of stock participation rights in undistributed earnings
(losses). Participating securities are defined as securities that participate in dividends with
common stock according to a predetermined formula. In addition
effective January 1, 2009, FASB clarified that share based payment awards that have not vested
meet the definition of a participating security provided the right to receive the dividend is
non-forfeitable and non-contingent. In applying the two-class method, the Company determined that
undistributed earnings should be allocated equally on a per share basis between common stock,
unvested restricted stock and participating preferred stock due to the equal participation rights
of the common stock, unvested restricted stock and participating preferred stock (i.e., the voting
conversion rights) and losses should be allocated equally on a per share basis between common stock
and participating preferred stock. The calculations of earnings (loss) per share for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008 have been revised to reflect the inclusion of the Companys
unvested restricted stock as a participating security under the two-class method.
The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the calculation of net income (loss)
per share in the Companys consolidated statement of operations and the differences between basic
weighted average shares outstanding and diluted weighted average shares outstanding used to compute
basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share, respectively:
For the Quarter Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to
Select Medical Holdings
Corporation |
$ | (823 | ) | $ | 583 | $ | 13,630 | $ | 45,371 | |||||||
Less: Preferred stock dividends |
6,290 | 6,667 | 18,569 | 19,537 | ||||||||||||
Less: Earnings (loss) allocated
to preferred stockholders |
(712 | ) | (582 | ) | (497 | ) | 2,497 | |||||||||
Less: Earnings allocated to
unvested restricted stockholders |
| | | 315 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) available to common
and preferred stockholders
basic and diluted |
$ | (6,401 | ) | $ | (5,502 | ) | $ | (4,442 | ) | $ | 23,022 | |||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares basic |
59,769 | 62,078 | 59,378 | 61,030 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Stock options |
| | | 470 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average shares diluted |
59,769 | 62,078 | 59,378 | 61,500 | ||||||||||||
Basic income (loss) per common
share |
$ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | 0.38 | |||||
Diluted income (loss) per common
share |
$ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | 0.37 |
18
Table of Contents
The following share amounts are shown here for informational and comparative purposes only
since their inclusion would be anti-dilutive:
For the Quarter Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock options |
55 | 469 | 852 | | ||||||||||||
Restricted stock |
1,518 | | 1,674 | |
12. Early Retirement of Debt
During the first and second quarter of 2009, the Company paid approximately $30.1 million to
repurchase and retire a portion of its 7 5/8% senior subordinated notes. These notes had a carrying
value of $46.5 million. A gain on early retirement of debt in the amount of $15.3 million was
recognized, which was net of the write-off of $1.0 million in unamortized deferred financing costs
related to the debt. In the third quarter of 2009, the Company paid approximately $6.5 million to
repurchase and retire a portion of Holdings senior floating rate notes with a carrying value of
$7.7 million. A gain on the early retirement of debt in the amount of $1.1 million was recognized
in the third quarter of 2009 which was net of the write off of $0.1 million in unamortized deferred
financing costs related to the debt.
13. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
To cover claims arising out of the operations of the Companys specialty hospitals and
outpatient rehabilitation facilities, the Company maintains professional malpractice liability
insurance and general liability insurance. The Company also maintains umbrella liability insurance
covering claims which, due to their nature or amount, are not covered by or not fully covered by
the Companys other insurance policies. These insurance policies also do not generally cover
punitive damages and are subject to various deductibles and policy limits. Significant legal
actions as well as the cost and possible lack of available insurance could subject the Company to
substantial uninsured liabilities.
The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of
business, which include malpractice claims covered under insurance policies, subject to
self-insured retention of $2.0 million per medical incident for professional liability claims and
$2.0 million per occurrence for general liability claims. In the Companys opinion, the outcome of
these actions will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of
operations.
Health care providers are subject to lawsuits under the qui tam provisions of the federal
False Claims Act. Qui tam lawsuits typically remain under seal (hence, usually unknown to the
defendant) for some time while the government decides whether or not to intervene on behalf of a
private qui tam plaintiff (known as a relator) and take the lead in the litigation. These lawsuits
can involve significant monetary damages and penalties and award bounties to private plaintiffs who
successfully bring the suits. The Company has been a defendant in these cases in the past, and may
be named as a defendant in similar cases from time to time in the future.
During July 2009, the Company received a subpoena from the Office of Inspector General of the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services seeking various documents concerning the Companys
financial relationships with certain physicians practicing at its hospitals in Columbus, Ohio. The
Company does not
know whether the subpoena has been issued in connection with a qui tam lawsuit or in connection
with possible civil, criminal or administrative proceedings by the government. The Company has
produced documents in response to the subpoena and intends to fully cooperate with this
investigation. At this time, the Company is unable to predict the timing and outcome of this
matter.
19
Table of Contents
Construction Commitments
At September 30, 2009, the Company has outstanding commitments under construction contracts
related to new construction, improvements and renovations at the Companys long term acute care
properties and inpatient rehabilitation facilities totaling approximately $23.3 million.
14. Financial Information for Subsidiary Guarantors and Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries under
Selects 7 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes
Selects 7 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior
subordinated basis by all of Selects wholly-owned subsidiaries (the Subsidiary Guarantors).
Certain of Selects subsidiaries did not guarantee the 7 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes (the
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries).
Select conducts a significant portion of its business through its subsidiaries. Presented
below is condensed consolidating financial information for Select, the Subsidiary Guarantors and
the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries at September 30, 2009 and for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2009.
The equity method has been used by Select with respect to investments in subsidiaries. The
equity method has been used by Subsidiary Guarantors with respect to investments in Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries. Separate financial statements for Subsidiary Guarantors are not presented.
The following table sets forth the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries at September 30, 2009:
Caritas Rehab Services, LLC
Elizabethtown Physical Therapy, P.S.C.
Great Lakes Specialty Hospital Hackley, LLC
Great Lakes Specialty Hospital Oak, LLC
Jeff Ayres, PT Therapy Center, Inc.
Jeffersontown Physical Therapy, LLC
Kentucky Orthopedic Rehabilitation, LLC
Kessler Core PT, OT and Speech Therapy at New York, LLC
Louisville Physical Therapy, P.S.C.
Metropolitan West Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine Services, Inc.
MKJ Physical Therapy, Inc.
New York Physician Services, P.C.
North Andover Physical Therapy, P.C.
Ohio Occupational Health, P.C., Inc.
Partners in Physical Therapy, PLLC
Penn State Hershey Rehabilitation, LLC
Philadelphia Occupational Health, P.C.
Rehabilitation Physician Services, P.C.
Select LifeCare Western Michigan, LLC
Select Physical Therapy of Las Vegas Limited Partnership
Select Specialty Downriver, LLC
Select Specialty Hospital Akron, LLC
Select Specialty Hospital Evansville, LLC
Select Specialty Hospital Central Pennsylvania, L.P.
Select Specialty Hospital Houston, L.P.
Select Specialty Hospital Gulf Coast, Inc.
Therex, P.C.
TJ Corporation I, LLC
U.S. Regional Occupational Health II, P.C.
U.S. Regional Occupational Health II of New Jersey, P.C.
Elizabethtown Physical Therapy, P.S.C.
Great Lakes Specialty Hospital Hackley, LLC
Great Lakes Specialty Hospital Oak, LLC
Jeff Ayres, PT Therapy Center, Inc.
Jeffersontown Physical Therapy, LLC
Kentucky Orthopedic Rehabilitation, LLC
Kessler Core PT, OT and Speech Therapy at New York, LLC
Louisville Physical Therapy, P.S.C.
Metropolitan West Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine Services, Inc.
MKJ Physical Therapy, Inc.
New York Physician Services, P.C.
North Andover Physical Therapy, P.C.
Ohio Occupational Health, P.C., Inc.
Partners in Physical Therapy, PLLC
Penn State Hershey Rehabilitation, LLC
Philadelphia Occupational Health, P.C.
Rehabilitation Physician Services, P.C.
Select LifeCare Western Michigan, LLC
Select Physical Therapy of Las Vegas Limited Partnership
Select Specialty Downriver, LLC
Select Specialty Hospital Akron, LLC
Select Specialty Hospital Evansville, LLC
Select Specialty Hospital Central Pennsylvania, L.P.
Select Specialty Hospital Houston, L.P.
Select Specialty Hospital Gulf Coast, Inc.
Therex, P.C.
TJ Corporation I, LLC
U.S. Regional Occupational Health II, P.C.
U.S. Regional Occupational Health II of New Jersey, P.C.
20
Table of Contents
Select Medical Corporation | ||||||||||||||||||||
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Select Medical | ||||||||||||||||||||
Corporation | Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
(Parent Company | Subsidiary | Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
Only) | Guarantors | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 277,458 | $ | 2,612 | $ | 422 | $ | | $ | 280,492 | ||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
118 | 291,971 | 18,766 | | 310,855 | |||||||||||||||
Current deferred tax asset |
28,645 | 20,564 | 2,217 | | 51,426 | |||||||||||||||
Prepaid income taxes |
13,338 | | | | 13,338 | |||||||||||||||
Other current assets |
3,459 | 15,800 | 2,893 | | 22,152 | |||||||||||||||
Total Current Assets |
323,018 | 330,947 | 24,298 | | 678,263 | |||||||||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
6,936 | 405,743 | 46,218 | | 458,897 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in affiliates |
2,109,416 | 45,574 | | (2,154,990 | )(a) (b) | | ||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
| 1,507,223 | | | 1,507,223 | |||||||||||||||
Other identifiable intangibles |
| 67,473 | | | 67,473 | |||||||||||||||
Assets held for sale |
11,342 | | | | 11,342 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets |
26,896 | 9,218 | 2,241 | | 38,355 | |||||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 2,477,608 | $ | 2,366,178 | $ | 72,757 | $ | (2,154,990 | ) | $ | 2,761,553 | |||||||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt
and notes payable |
$ | 140,902 | $ | 759 | $ | 6 | $ | | $ | 141,667 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable |
1,548 | 55,556 | 6,999 | | 64,103 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany accounts |
474,737 | (441,705 | ) | (33,032 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Accrued payroll |
1,658 | 63,165 | 168 | | 64,991 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued vacation |
2,782 | 32,153 | 3,147 | | 38,082 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued interest |
12,308 | 37 | | | 12,345 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued restructuring |
| 4,740 | | | 4,740 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued other |
72,660 | 40,407 | 2,779 | | 115,846 | |||||||||||||||
Due to third party payors |
| 12,842 | (10,663 | ) | | 2,179 | ||||||||||||||
Total Current Liabilities |
706,595 | (232,046 | ) | (30,596 | ) | | 443,953 | |||||||||||||
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
733,810 | 439,417 | 44,025 | | 1,217,252 | |||||||||||||||
Non-current deferred tax liability |
(777 | ) | 49,409 | 6,101 | | 54,733 | ||||||||||||||
Other non-current liabilities |
60,648 | | | | 60,648 | |||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities |
1,500,276 | 256,780 | 19,530 | | 1,776,586 | |||||||||||||||
Stockholders Equity: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Capital in excess of par |
786,304 | | | | 786,304 | |||||||||||||||
Retained earnings |
201,708 | 374,733 | 17,116 | (391,849 | )(b) | 201,708 | ||||||||||||||
Subsidiary investment |
| 1,734,665 | 28,476 | (1,763,141 | )(a) | | ||||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(10,680 | ) | | | | (10,680 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total Select Medical Corporation
Stockholders Equity |
977,332 | 2,109,398 | 45,592 | (2,154,990 | ) | 977,332 | ||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interest |
| | 7,635 | | 7,635 | |||||||||||||||
Total Equity |
977,332 | 2,109,398 | 53,227 | (2,154,990 | ) | 984,967 | ||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities and Equity |
$ | 2,477,608 | $ | 2,366,178 | $ | 72,757 | $ | (2,154,990 | ) | $ | 2,761,553 | |||||||||
(a) | Elimination of investments in subsidiaries. | |
(b) | Elimination of investments in subsidiaries earnings. |
21
Table of Contents
Select Medical Corporation | ||||||||||||||||||||
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations | ||||||||||||||||||||
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Select Medical | ||||||||||||||||||||
Corporation | Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
(Parent Company | Subsidiary | Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
Only) | Guarantors | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating revenues |
$ | 11 | $ | 486,958 | $ | 58,652 | $ | | $ | 545,621 | ||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of services |
90 | 399,316 | 49,296 | | 448,702 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
34,594 | 24 | | | 34,618 | |||||||||||||||
Bad debt expense |
| 8,440 | 3,280 | | 11,720 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
831 | 15,297 | 1,548 | | 17,676 | |||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
35,515 | 423,077 | 54,124 | | 512,716 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
(35,504 | ) | 63,881 | 4,528 | | 32,905 | ||||||||||||||
Other income and expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany interest and royalty fees |
(1,141 | ) | 1,138 | 3 | | | ||||||||||||||
Intercompany management fees |
31,929 | (29,286 | ) | (2,643 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Other income |
2,215 | | | | 2,215 | |||||||||||||||
Interest income |
2 | | | | 2 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(15,513 | ) | (8,726 | ) | (875 | ) | | (25,114 | ) | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes |
(18,012 | ) | 27,007 | 1,013 | | 10,008 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
(3,768 | ) | 5,318 | 944 | | 2,494 | ||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
20,952 | (429 | ) | | (20,523 | )(a) | | |||||||||||||
Net income |
6,708 | 21,260 | 69 | (20,523 | ) | 7,514 | ||||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests |
| | 806 | | 806 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Select Medical
Corporation |
$ | 6,708 | $ | 21,260 | $ | (737 | ) | $ | (20,523 | ) | $ | 6,708 | ||||||||
(a) | Elimination of equity in net income from consolidated subsidiaries. |
22
Table of Contents
Select Medical Corporation | ||||||||||||||||||||
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations | ||||||||||||||||||||
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Select Medical | Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporation (Parent | Subsidiary | Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
Company Only) | Guarantors | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating revenues |
$ | 146 | $ | 1,487,899 | $ | 178,283 | $ | | $ | 1,666,328 | ||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of services |
201 | 1,202,007 | 150,899 | | 1,353,107 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
60,210 | 68 | | | 60,278 | |||||||||||||||
Bad debt expense |
| 27,862 | 5,816 | | 33,678 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
2,408 | 46,315 | 4,623 | | 53,346 | |||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
62,819 | 1,276,252 | 161,338 | | 1,500,409 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
(62,673 | ) | 211,647 | 16,945 | | 165,919 | ||||||||||||||
Other income and expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany interest and royalty fees |
(6,292 | ) | 6,252 | 40 | | | ||||||||||||||
Intercompany management fees |
95,063 | (87,810 | ) | (7,253 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Gain on early retirement of debt |
15,316 | | | | 15,316 | |||||||||||||||
Other income |
3,836 | | | | 3,836 | |||||||||||||||
Interest income |
65 | 16 | 1 | | 82 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(47,914 | ) | (25,670 | ) | (2,352 | ) | | (75,936 | ) | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes |
(2,599 | ) | 104,435 | 7,381 | | 109,217 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
3,420 | 38,833 | 816 | | 43,069 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
69,949 | 4,767 | | (74,716 | )(a) | | ||||||||||||||
Net income |
63,930 | 70,369 | 6,565 | (74,716 | ) | 66,148 | ||||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests |
| | 2,218 | | 2,218 | |||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Select Medical Corporation |
$ | 63,930 | $ | 70,369 | $ | 4,347 | $ | (74,716 | ) | $ | 63,930 | |||||||||
(a) | Elimination of equity in net income from consolidated subsidiaries. |
23
Table of Contents
Select Medical Corporation | ||||||||||||||||||||
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows | ||||||||||||||||||||
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Select Medical | ||||||||||||||||||||
Corporation | Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
(Parent Company | Subsidiary | Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
Only) | Guarantors | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 63,930 | $ | 70,369 | $ | 6,565 | $ | (74,716 | )(a) | $ | 66,148 | |||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
2,408 | 46,315 | 4,623 | | 53,346 | |||||||||||||||
Provision for bad debts |
| 27,862 | 5,816 | | 33,678 | |||||||||||||||
Gain on early retirement of debt |
(15,316 | ) | | | | (15,316 | ) | |||||||||||||
Loss from disposal of assets and sale of business units |
15 | 506 | 29 | | 550 | |||||||||||||||
Non-cash gain from interest rate swaps |
(3,836 | ) | | | | (3,836 | ) | |||||||||||||
Non-cash stock compensation expense |
4,795 | | | | 4,795 | |||||||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of
effects from acquisition of businesses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
(69,949 | ) | (4,767 | ) | | 74,716 | (a) | | ||||||||||||
Intercompany |
132,270 | (125,875 | ) | (6,395 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(111 | ) | (26,654 | ) | (5,268 | ) | | (32,033 | ) | |||||||||||
Other current assets |
(765 | ) | 1,681 | (1,898 | ) | | (982 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other assets |
5,724 | (2,235 | ) | 100 | | 3,589 | ||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
(3,105 | ) | (4,253 | ) | (1,008 | ) | | (8,366 | ) | |||||||||||
Due to third-party payors |
| (8,118 | ) | 4,588 | | (3,530 | ) | |||||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
8,002 | (1,211 | ) | 824 | | 7,615 | ||||||||||||||
Income and deferred taxes |
20,608 | | | | 20,608 | |||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
144,670 | (26,380 | ) | 7,976 | | 126,266 | ||||||||||||||
Investing activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(1,117 | ) | (23,644 | ) | (10,489 | ) | | (35,250 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of property |
| 1,341 | | | 1,341 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired |
| (381 | ) | | | (381 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(1,117 | ) | (22,684 | ) | (10,489 | ) | | (34,290 | ) | |||||||||||
Financing activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings on revolving credit facility |
193,000 | | | | 193,000 | |||||||||||||||
Payments on revolving credit facility |
(253,000 | ) | | | | (253,000 | ) | |||||||||||||
Payments on credit facility term loan |
(5,033 | ) | | | | (5,033 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repurchase of 7 5/8% senior subordianted notes |
(30,114 | ) | | | | (30,114 | ) | |||||||||||||
Borrowings of other debt |
5,184 | | | | 5,184 | |||||||||||||||
Principal payments on seller and other debt |
(4,892 | ) | (837 | ) | (9 | ) | | (5,738 | ) | |||||||||||
Dividends paid to Holdings |
(39,367 | ) | | | | (39,367 | ) | |||||||||||||
Payment of initial public offering costs |
(584 | ) | | | | (584 | ) | |||||||||||||
Equity investment by Holdings |
282,024 | | | | 282,024 | |||||||||||||||
Repayment of bank overdrafts |
(21,130 | ) | | | | (21,130 | ) | |||||||||||||
Intercompany debt reallocation |
(50,515 | ) | 47,405 | 3,110 | | | ||||||||||||||
Equity contribution and loans from non-controlling interests |
| | 1,500 | | 1,500 | |||||||||||||||
Distributions to non-controlling interests |
| | (2,486 | ) | | (2,486 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
75,573 | 46,568 | 2,115 | | 124,256 | |||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
219,126 | (2,496 | ) | (398 | ) | | 216,232 | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
58,332 | 5,108 | 820 | | 64,260 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 277,458 | $ | 2,612 | $ | 422 | $ | | $ | 280,492 | ||||||||||
(a) | Elimination of equity in earnings of subsidiary. |
24
Table of Contents
Select Medical Corporation | ||||||||||||||||||||
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Select Medical | ||||||||||||||||||||
Corporation | Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
(Parent Company | Subsidiary | Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
Only) | Guarantors | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 58,332 | $ | 5,108 | $ | 820 | $ | | $ | 64,260 | ||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
7 | 293,097 | 19,314 | | 312,418 | |||||||||||||||
Current deferred tax asset |
18,653 | 27,930 | 2,011 | | 48,594 | |||||||||||||||
Prepaid income taxes |
7,362 | | | | 7,362 | |||||||||||||||
Other current assets |
2,694 | 17,208 | 995 | | 20,897 | |||||||||||||||
Total Current Assets |
87,048 | 343,343 | 23,140 | | 453,531 | |||||||||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
8,431 | 422,067 | 40,567 | | 471,065 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in affiliates |
2,035,591 | 47,911 | | (2,083,502 | )(a)(b) | | ||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
| 1,506,661 | | | 1,506,661 | |||||||||||||||
Other identifiable intangibles |
| 74,078 | | | 74,078 | |||||||||||||||
Assets held for sale |
12,542 | | | | 12,542 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets |
32,620 | 9,587 | 2,341 | | 44,548 | |||||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 2,176,232 | $ | 2,403,647 | $ | 66,048 | $ | (2,083,502 | ) | $ | 2,562,425 | |||||||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Bank overdrafts |
$ | 21,130 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 21,130 | ||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt
and notes payable |
8,063 | 971 | 12 | | 9,046 | |||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
4,653 | 59,836 | 8,007 | | 72,496 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany accounts |
335,903 | (301,905 | ) | (33,998 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Accrued payroll |
1,193 | 65,118 | 69 | | 66,380 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued vacation |
2,781 | 31,134 | 3,194 | | 37,109 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued interest |
25,410 | 34 | | | 25,444 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued restructuring |
| 8,108 | | | 8,108 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued other |
52,022 | 53,953 | 2,007 | | 107,982 | |||||||||||||||
Due to third party payors |
| 20,960 | (15,251 | ) | | 5,709 | ||||||||||||||
Total Current Liabilities |
451,155 | (61,791 | ) | (35,960 | ) | | 353,404 | |||||||||||||
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
1,035,208 | 385,549 | 39,519 | | 1,460,276 | |||||||||||||||
Non-current deferred tax liability |
(8,155 | ) | 45,769 | 5,304 | | 42,918 | ||||||||||||||
Other non-current liabilities |
67,709 | | | | 67,709 | |||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities |
1,545,917 | 369,527 | 8,863 | | 1,924,307 | |||||||||||||||
Stockholders Equity: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Capital in excess of par |
481,094 | | | | 481,094 | |||||||||||||||
Retained earnings |
160,657 | 304,364 | 21,269 | (325,633 | )(b) | 160,657 | ||||||||||||||
Subsidiary investment |
| 1,729,756 | 28,113 | (1,757,869 | )(a) | | ||||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(11,436 | ) | | | | (11,436 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total Select Medical Corporation
Stockholders Equity |
630,315 | 2,034,120 | 49,382 | (2,083,502 | ) | 630,315 | ||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interest |
| | 7,803 | | 7,803 | |||||||||||||||
Total Equity |
630,315 | 2,034,120 | 57,185 | (2,083,502 | ) | 638,118 | ||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities and Equity |
$ | 2,176,232 | $ | 2,403,647 | $ | 66,048 | $ | (2,083,502 | ) | $ | 2,562,425 | |||||||||
(a) | Elimination of investments in subsidiaries. | |
(b) | Elimination of investments in subsidiaries earnings. |
25
Table of Contents
Select Medical Corporation | ||||||||||||||||||||
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations | ||||||||||||||||||||
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Select Medical | ||||||||||||||||||||
Corporation | Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
(Parent Company | Subsidiary | Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
Only) | Guarantors | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating revenues |
$ | 39 | $ | 468,232 | $ | 50,908 | $ | | $ | 519,179 | ||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of services |
36 | 399,202 | 42,157 | | 441,395 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
11,387 | 151 | | | 11,538 | |||||||||||||||
Bad debt expense |
| 10,883 | 1,357 | | 12,240 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
821 | 15,752 | 1,275 | | 17,848 | |||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
12,244 | 425,988 | 44,789 | | 483,021 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
(12,205 | ) | 42,244 | 6,119 | | 36,158 | ||||||||||||||
Other income and expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany interest and royalty fees |
(8,289 | ) | 8,219 | 70 | | | ||||||||||||||
Intercompany management fees |
35,102 | (33,228 | ) | (1,874 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Other income |
1,322 | | | | 1,322 | |||||||||||||||
Interest income |
48 | 40 | 5 | | 93 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(18,830 | ) | (7,865 | ) | (725 | ) | | (27,420 | ) | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes |
(2,852 | ) | 9,410 | 3,595 | | 10,153 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
(487 | ) | 3,893 | 2 | | 3,408 | ||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
8,078 | 2,493 | | (10,571 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net income |
5,713 | 8,010 | 3,593 | (10,571 | ) | 6,745 | ||||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interest |
| | 1,032 | | 1,032 | |||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Select Medical Corporation |
$ | 5,713 | $ | 8,010 | $ | 2,561 | $ | (10,571 | ) | $ | 5,713 | |||||||||
(a) | Elimination of equity in net income from consolidated subsidiaries. |
26
Table of Contents
Select Medical Corporation | ||||||||||||||||||||
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations | ||||||||||||||||||||
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Select Medical | ||||||||||||||||||||
Corporation | Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
(Parent Company | Subsidiary | Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
Only) | Guarantors | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating revenues |
$ | 158 | $ | 1,457,422 | $ | 148,683 | $ | | $ | 1,606,263 | ||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of services |
81 | 1,216,488 | 126,453 | | 1,343,022 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
35,636 | 207 | | | 35,843 | |||||||||||||||
Bad debt expense |
| 32,066 | 3,234 | | 35,300 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
2,407 | 47,040 | 3,728 | | 53,175 | |||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
38,124 | 1,295,801 | 133,415 | | 1,467,340 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
(37,966 | ) | 161,621 | 15,268 | | 138,923 | ||||||||||||||
Other income and expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany interest and royalty fees |
(29,766 | ) | 29,489 | 277 | | | ||||||||||||||
Intercompany management fees |
129,767 | (124,412 | ) | (5,355 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Other expense |
(1,180 | ) | | | | (1,180 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest income |
154 | 116 | 5 | | 275 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(58,512 | ) | (22,875 | ) | (2,041 | ) | | (83,428 | ) | |||||||||||
Income from operations before income taxes |
2,497 | 43,939 | 8,154 | | 54,590 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
2,605 | 19,155 | 850 | | 22,610 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
29,985 | 5,712 | | (35,697 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net income |
29,877 | 30,496 | 7,304 | (35,697 | ) | 31,980 | ||||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests |
| | 2,103 | | 2,103 | |||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Select Medical Corporation |
$ | 29,877 | $ | 30,496 | $ | 5,201 | $ | (35,697 | ) | $ | 29,877 | |||||||||
(a) | Elimination of equity in net income from consolidated subsidiaries. |
27
Table of Contents
Select Medical Corporation | ||||||||||||||||||||
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows | ||||||||||||||||||||
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Select Medical | ||||||||||||||||||||
Corporation | Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
(Parent Company | Subsidiary | Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
Only) | Guarantors | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 29,877 | $ | 30,496 | $ | 7,304 | $ | (35,697 | )(a) | $ | 31,980 | |||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
2,407 | 47,040 | 3,728 | | 53,175 | |||||||||||||||
Provision for bad debts |
| 32,066 | 3,234 | | 35,300 | |||||||||||||||
Loss (gain) from disposal of assets and sale of business units |
19 | (336 | ) | 1 | | (316 | ) | |||||||||||||
Non-cash loss from interest rate swaps |
1,180 | | | | 1,180 | |||||||||||||||
Non-cash stock compensation expense |
1,697 | | | | 1,697 | |||||||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of
effects from acquisition of businesses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
(29,985 | ) | (5,712 | ) | | 35,697 | (a) | | ||||||||||||
Intercompany |
48,454 | (40,859 | ) | (7,595 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
32 | (70,196 | ) | (4,811 | ) | | (74,975 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other current assets |
(110 | ) | 5,975 | (400 | ) | | 5,465 | |||||||||||||
Other assets |
(16,364 | ) | 27,461 | (138 | ) | | 10,959 | |||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
380 | (5,367 | ) | 70 | | (4,917 | ) | |||||||||||||
Due to third-party payors |
| (4,622 | ) | (4,706 | ) | | (9,328 | ) | ||||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
(9,096 | ) | 7,675 | 30 | | (1,391 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income and deferred taxes |
17,950 | | | | 17,950 | |||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
46,441 | 23,621 | (3,283 | ) | | 66,779 | ||||||||||||||
Investing activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(2,338 | ) | (31,710 | ) | (1,722 | ) | | (35,770 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of business units |
| 1,851 | | | 1,851 | |||||||||||||||
Sale of real property |
| 743 | | | 743 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired |
| (4,687 | ) | (2,715 | ) | | (7,402 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(2,338 | ) | (33,803 | ) | (4,437 | ) | | (40,578 | ) | |||||||||||
Financing activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings on revolving credit facility |
387,000 | | | | 387,000 | |||||||||||||||
Payments on revolving credit facility |
(357,000 | ) | | | | (357,000 | ) | |||||||||||||
Payments on credit facility term loan |
(5,100 | ) | | | | (5,100 | ) | |||||||||||||
Principal payments on seller and other debt |
(3,818 | ) | (194 | ) | (3 | ) | | (4,015 | ) | |||||||||||
Repayment of bank overdrafts |
(7,217 | ) | | | | (7,217 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividends paid to Holdings |
(33,418 | ) | | | | (33,418 | ) | |||||||||||||
Intercompany debt reallocation |
(19,325 | ) | 10,111 | 9,214 | | | ||||||||||||||
Equity investment by Holdings |
90 | | | | 90 | |||||||||||||||
Distributions to non-controlling interests |
| | (1,703 | ) | | (1,703 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(38,788 | ) | 9,917 | 7,508 | | (21,363 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
5,315 | (265 | ) | (212 | ) | | 4,838 | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
161 | 3,102 | 1,266 | | 4,529 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 5,476 | $ | 2,837 | $ | 1,054 | $ | | $ | 9,367 | ||||||||||
(a) | Elimination of equity in earnings of subsidiary. |
28
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read this discussion together with our unaudited consolidated financial statements
and accompanying notes. Unless indicated otherwise, any reference in this report to Holdings
refers to Select Medical Holdings Corporation and any reference to Select refers to Select
Medical Corporation, the wholly-owned operating subsidiary of Holdings. References to the
Company, we, us, and our refer collectively to Select Medical Holdings Corporation and
Select Medical Corporation.
Forward Looking Statements
This discussion contains forward-looking statements relating to the financial condition,
results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of Select Medical
Corporation and Select Medical Holdings Corporation. These statements include, without limitation,
statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words believes, expects, anticipates,
estimates or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking
statements due to factors including the following:
| additional changes in government reimbursement for our services may result in a reduction in net operating revenues, an increase in costs and a reduction in profitability; |
| the failure of our long term acute care hospitals to maintain their status as such may cause our net operating revenues and profitability to decline; |
| the failure of our facilities operated as hospitals within hospitals to qualify as hospitals separate from their host hospitals may cause our net operating revenues and profitability to decline; |
| implementation of modifications to the admissions policies for our inpatient rehabilitation facilities, as required to achieve compliance with Medicare guidelines, may result in a loss of patient volume at these hospitals and, as a result, may reduce our future net operating revenues and profitability; |
| a government investigation or assertion that we have violated applicable regulations may result in sanctions or reputational harm and increased costs; |
| future acquisitions or joint ventures may prove difficult or unsuccessful, use significant resources or expose us to unforeseen liabilities; |
| private third-party payors for our services may undertake future cost containment initiatives that limit our future net operating revenues and profitability; |
| the failure to maintain established relationships with the physicians in the areas we serve could reduce our net operating revenues and profitability; |
| shortages in qualified nurses or therapists could increase our operating costs significantly; |
| competition may limit our ability to grow and result in a decrease in our net operating revenues and profitability; |
| the loss of key members of our management team could significantly disrupt our operations; |
| the effect of claims asserted against us or lack of adequate available insurance could subject us to substantial uninsured liabilities; |
| the ability to obtain any necessary or desired waiver or amendment from our lenders may be difficult due to the current uncertainty in the credit markets; and |
| the inability to draw funds under our senior secured credit facility because of lender defaults. |
29
Table of Contents
Overview
We believe that we are one of the largest operators of both specialty hospitals and outpatient
rehabilitation clinics in the United States based on number of facilities. As of September 30,
2009, we operated 89 long term acute care hospitals and five inpatient rehabilitation facilities in
25 states, and 947 outpatient rehabilitation clinics in 37 states and the District of Columbia. We
also provide medical rehabilitation services on a contract basis at nursing homes, hospitals,
assisted living and senior care centers, schools and worksites. We began operations in 1997 under
the leadership of our current management team.
We manage our company through two business segments, our specialty hospital segment and our
outpatient rehabilitation segment. We had net operating revenues of $1,666.3 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009. Of this total, we earned approximately 69% of our net operating
revenues from our specialty hospitals and approximately 31% from our outpatient rehabilitation
business. Our specialty hospital segment consists of hospitals designed to serve the needs of long
term stay acute patients and hospitals designed to serve patients who require intensive inpatient
medical rehabilitation care. Patients are typically admitted to our specialty hospitals from
general acute care hospitals. These patients have specialized needs, and serious and often complex
medical conditions such as respiratory failure, neuromuscular disorders, traumatic brain and spinal
cord injuries, strokes, non-healing wounds, cardiac disorders, renal disorders and cancer. Our
outpatient rehabilitation segment consists of clinics and contract services that provide physical,
occupational and speech rehabilitation services. Our outpatient rehabilitation patients are
typically diagnosed with musculoskeletal impairments that restrict their ability to perform normal
activities of daily living.
Recent Trends and Events
Initial Public Offering of Common Stock
On September 30, 2009, Holdings completed its initial public offering of common stock at a
price to the public of $10.00 per share. Holdings sold 30,000,000 shares in the offering. The
total net proceeds to Holdings from the offering after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions and offering expenses were approximately $279.1 million. We used the net proceeds from
the offering to repay indebtedness and to make payments to our executive officers under our Long
Term Cash Incentive Plan, and will use the remaining net proceeds from the offering to repay
additional indebtedness or for general corporate purposes. The closing and receipt of cash
occurred on September 30, 2009, however, the repayments of indebtedness and payment under our Long
Term Cash Incentive Plan were not made until October. As a result, we have reported a significant
amount of cash on our September 30, 2009 balance sheet and we have reflected the mandatory
repayment under our credit facility as a current portion of long term debt.
On October 28, 2009, the underwriters purchased an additional 3,602,700 shares pursuant to
their over-allotment option at a price to the public of $10.00 per share. The total net proceeds
to Holdings from the exercise of the over-allotment option were approximately $33.9 million. A
portion of the net proceeds from the exercise of the over-allotment option were used to repay
indebtedness, including a mandatory prepayment obligation under the senior secured
credit facility in the amount of 50% of the net proceeds, and any remaining proceeds will be used
to repay additional indebtedness or for general corporate purposes.
30
Table of Contents
Third Quarter Ended September 30, 2009
For the three months ended September 30, 2009, our net operating revenues increased 5.1% to
$545.6 million compared to $519.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. This
increase in net
operating revenues resulted from a 5.0% increase in our specialty hospital net operating
revenue and a 5.3% increase in our outpatient rehabilitation net operating revenue. The increase
in our specialty hospital net operating revenue is principally due to the hospitals we opened in
2008 and the increase in our outpatient rehabilitation net operating revenue is principally related
to an increase in contracted services based revenues. We realized income from operations for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 of $32.9 million compared to $36.2 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease in income from operations is due to the compensation
costs of $22.0 million we incurred associated with our initial public offering of common stock,
which included an $18.3 million payment under our Long Term Cash Incentive Plan and $3.7 million in
stock compensation expense related to the grant of restricted stock that vested in connection with
our initial public offering of common stock. The decrease in income from operations caused by the increase in compensation costs was offset by increases in
income from operations in the hospitals opened as of January 1, 2008 and operated by us throughout
both periods, the hospitals we opened in 2008 and our outpatient clinics. Holdings interest
expense for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was $33.5 million compared to $36.2 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2008. Selects interest expense for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 was $25.1 million compared to $27.4 million for the three months ended September
30, 2008. The decrease in interest expense for both Holdings and Select is attributable to a
reduction in outstanding debt balances and a decline in interest rates.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, our net operating revenues increased 3.7% to
$1,666.3 million compared to $1,606.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This
increase in net operating revenues primarily resulted from a 4.7% increase in our specialty
hospital net operating revenue. The increase in specialty hospital net operating revenue is
principally due to the hospitals we opened in 2008. We had income from operations for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 of $165.9 million compared to $138.9 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. The increase in income from operations is principally related to an
increase in the profitability of our specialty hospitals opened as of January 1, 2008 and operated
throughout both periods and an improvement in the operating results of the hospitals opened in
2008, offset by the compensation costs of $22.0 million we incurred associated with our initial
public offering of common stock. Holdings interest expense for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 was $101.8 million compared to $109.6 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. Selects interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $75.9 million
compared to $83.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease in interest
expense for both Holdings and Select is attributable to a reduction in outstanding debt balances
and a decline in interest rates.
Cash flow from operations provided $93.4 million of cash for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 for Holdings and cash flow from operations provided $126.3 million of cash for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 for Select. The difference primarily relates to interest payments
on Holdings senior subordinated notes and senior floating rate notes.
Regulatory Changes
Medicare Reimbursement of Long Term Acute Care Hospital Services
In the last few years, there have been significant regulatory changes affecting long term
acute care hospitals, or LTCHs, that have affected our net operating revenues and, in some cases,
caused us to change our operating models and strategies. The following is a summary of some of the
more significant healthcare regulatory changes that have affected our financial performance in the
past or are likely to affect our financial performance in the future.
31
Table of Contents
We have been subject to regulatory changes that occur through the rulemaking procedures of the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS. Historically, rule updates occurred twice each
year. All Medicare
payments to our long term acute care hospitals are made in accordance with a prospective
payment system specifically applicable to long term acute care hospitals, referred to as
LTCH-PPS. Proposed rules specifically related to LTCHs were generally published in January,
finalized in May and effective on July 1st of each year. Additionally, LTCHs are subject to annual
updates to the rules related to the inpatient prospective payment system, or IPPS, that are
typically proposed in May, finalized in August and effective on October 1st of each year. In the
annual payment rate update for the 2009 fiscal year, CMS consolidated the two historical annual
updates into one annual update. The final rule adopted a 15-month rate update for fiscal year 2009
and moves the LTCH-PPS from a July-June update cycle to an October-September cycle. Beginning
fiscal year 2010 the LTCH rate year will begin October 1, coinciding with the start of the federal
fiscal year.
August 2004 Final Rule. On August 11, 2004, CMS published final regulations applicable to
LTCHs that are operated as hospital within hospitals or as satellites. We collectively refer to
hospital within hospitals and satellites as HIHs, and we refer to the CMS final regulations as
the final regulations. HIHs are separate hospitals located in space leased from, and located in
or on the same campus of, another hospital. We refer to such other hospitals as host hospitals.
Effective for hospital cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2004, subject to
certain exceptions, the final regulations provide lower rates of reimbursement to HIHs for those
Medicare patients admitted from their host hospitals that are in excess of a specified percentage
threshold. For HIHs opened after October 1, 2004, the Medicare admissions threshold has been
established at 25% except for HIHs located in rural areas or co-located with MSA dominant
hospitals or single urban hospitals where the percentage is no more than 50%, nor less than 25%.
For HIHs that met specified criteria and were in existence as of October 1, 2004, including all but
two of our then existing HIHs, the Medicare admissions thresholds were to have been phased in over
a four year period starting with hospital cost reporting periods that began on or after October 1,
2004. However, as described below, many of these changes have been postponed for a three year
period by the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007, or SCHIP Extension Act, and
further clarified in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, or ARRA.
May 2007 Final Rule. On May 11, 2007, CMS published its annual payment rate update for the
2008 LTCH-PPS rate year, or RY 2008 (affecting discharges and cost reporting periods beginning on
or after July 1, 2007 and before July 1, 2008). The May 2007 final rule made several changes to
LTCH-PPS payment methodologies and amounts during RY 2008 although, as described below, many of
these changes have been postponed for a three year period by the SCHIP Extension Act.
For cost reporting periods beginning on or after July 1, 2007, the May 2007 final rule
expanded the Medicare HIH admissions threshold to apply to Medicare patients admitted from any
individual hospital. Previously, the admissions threshold was applicable only to Medicare HIH
admissions from hospitals co-located with an LTCH or satellite of an LTCH. Under the May 2007 final
rule, free-standing LTCHs and grandfathered HIHs would be subject to the Medicare admission
thresholds, as well as HIHs and satellites that admit Medicare patients from non-co-located
hospitals. To the extent that any LTCHs or LTCH satellite facilitys discharges that are admitted
from an individual hospital (regardless of whether the referring hospital is co-located with the
LTCH or LTCH satellite) exceed the applicable percentage threshold during a particular cost
reporting period, the payment rate for those discharges would be subject to a downward payment
adjustment. Cases admitted in excess of the applicable threshold would be reimbursed at a rate
comparable to that under general acute care IPPS, which is generally lower than LTCH-PPS rates.
Cases that reach outlier status in the discharging hospital would not count toward the limit and
would be paid under LTCH-PPS. CMS estimated the impact of the expansion of the Medicare admission
thresholds would result in a reduction of 2.2% of the aggregate payments to all LTCHs in RY 2008.
32
Table of Contents
The applicable percentage threshold is generally 25% after the completion of the phase-in
period described below. The percentage threshold for LTCH discharges from a referring hospital that
is an MSA dominant
hospital or a single urban hospital is the percentage of total Medicare discharges in the MSA
that are from the referring hospital, but no less than 25% nor more than 50%. For Medicare
discharges from LTCHs or LTCH satellites located in rural areas, as defined by the Office of
Management and Budget, the percentage threshold is 50% from any individual referring hospital. The
expanded 25% rule is being phased in over a three year period. The three year transition period
starts with cost reporting periods beginning on or after July 1, 2007 and before July 1, 2008, when
the threshold is the lesser of 75% or the percentage of the LTCHs or LTCH satellites admissions
discharged from the referring hospital during its cost reporting period beginning on or after July
1, 2004 and before July 1, 2005, or RY 2005. For cost reporting periods beginning on or after
July 1, 2008 and before July 1, 2009, the threshold is the lesser of 50% or the percentage of
the LTCHs or LTCH satellites admissions from the referring hospital, during its RY 2005 cost
reporting period. For cost reporting periods beginning on or after July 1, 2009, all LTCHs will be
subject to the 25% threshold (or applicable threshold for rural, urban-single, or MSA dominant
hospitals). The SCHIP Extension Act, as amended by the ARRA, postponed the application of the
percentage threshold to all free-standing and grandfathered HIHs for a three year period commencing
on an LTCHs first cost reporting period on or after July 1, 2007. However, the SCHIP Extension Act
did not postpone the application of the percentage threshold, or the transition period stated
above, to those Medicare patients discharged from an LTCH HIH or HIH satellite that were admitted
from a non-co-located hospital. The SCHIP Extension Act only postpones the expansion of the
admission threshold in the May 2007 final rule to free-standing LTCHs and grandfathered HIHs.
The May 2007 final rule further revised the payment adjustment formula for short stay outlier,
or SSO cases. Beginning with discharges on or after July 1, 2007, for cases with a length of stay
that is less than the average length of stay plus one standard deviation for the same DRG under
IPPS, referred to as the so-called IPPS comparable threshold, the rule effectively lowers the
LTCH payment to a rate based on the general acute care hospital IPPS. SSO cases with covered
lengths of stay that exceed the IPPS comparable threshold would continue to be paid under the SSO
payment policy described above under the May 2006 final rule. Cases with a covered length of stay
less than or equal to the IPPS comparable threshold and less than five-sixths of the geometric
average length of stay for that LTC-DRG would be paid at an amount comparable to the IPPS per diem.
The SCHIP Extension Act also postponed, for the three year period beginning on December 29, 2007,
the SSO policy changes made in the May 2007 final rule.
The May 2007 final rule increased the standard federal rate by 0.71% for RY 2008. As a result,
the federal rate for RY 2008 is equal to $38,356.45, compared to $38,086.04 for RY 2007.
Subsequently, the SCHIP Extension Act eliminated the update to the standard federal rate that
occurred for RY 2008 effective April 1, 2008. This adjustment to the standard federal rate was
applied prospectively on April 1, 2008 and reduced the federal rate back to $38,086.04. In a
technical correction to the May 2007 final rule, CMS increased the fixed-loss amount for high cost
outlier in RY 2008 to $20,738, compared to $14,887 in RY 2007. CMS projected an estimated 0.4%
decrease in LTCH payments in RY 2008 due to this change in the fixed-loss amount and the overall
impact of the May 2007 final rule to be a 1.2% decrease in total estimated LTCH-PPS payments for RY
2008.
The May 2007 final rule provided that beginning with the annual payment rate updates to the
LTC-DRG classifications and relative weights for the fiscal year 2008, or FY 2008 (affecting
discharges beginning on or after October 1, 2007 and before September 30, 2008), annual updates to
the LTC-DRG classification and relative weights are to have a budget neutral impact. Under the May
2007 final rule, future LTC-DRG reclassification and recalibrations, by themselves, should neither
increase nor decrease the estimated aggregated LTCH-PPS payments.
33
Table of Contents
The May 2007 final rule is complex and the SCHIP Extension Act postponed the implementation of
certain portions of the May 2007 final rule. While we cannot predict the ultimate long-term impact
of LTCH-PPS
because the payment system remains subject to significant change, if the May 2007 final rule
becomes effective as currently written, after the expiration of the applicable provisions of the
SCHIP Extension Act, our future net operating revenues and profitability will be adversely
affected.
August 2007 Final Rule. On August 22, 2007, CMS published the IPPS final rule for FY 2008,
which created a new patient classification system with categories referred to as MS-DRGs and
MS-LTC-DRGs, respectively, for hospitals reimbursed under IPPS and LTCH-PPS. Beginning with
discharges on or after October 1, 2007, the new classification categories take into account the
severity of the patients condition. CMS assigned proposed relative weights to each MS-DRG and
MS-LTC-DRG to reflect their relative use of medical care resources.
The August 2007 final rule published a budget neutral update to the MS-LTC-DRG classification
and relative weights. In the preamble to the IPPS final rule for FY 2008 CMS restated that it
intends to continue to update the LTC-DRG weights annually in the IPPS rulemaking and those weights
would be modified by a budget neutrality adjustment factor to ensure that estimated aggregate LTCH
payments after reweighting are equal to estimated aggregate LTCH payments before reweighting.
Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007. On December 29, 2007, President Bush
signed into law the SCHIP Extension Act. Among other changes in the federal health care programs,
the SCHIP Extension Act makes significant changes to Medicare policy for LTCHs including a new
statutory definition of an LTCH, a report to Congress on new LTCH patient criteria, relief from
certain LTCH-PPS payment policies for three years, a three year moratorium on the establishment and
classification of new LTCHs and LTCH beds, elimination of the payment update for the last quarter
of RY 2008 and new medical necessity reviews by Medicare contractors through at least October 1,
2010.
The SCHIP Extension Act precludes the Secretary from implementing, during the three year
moratorium period, the provisions added by the May 2007 final rule that extended the 25% rule to
free-standing LTCHs and grandfathered HIHs. The SCHIP Extension Act also modifies, during the
moratorium, the effect of the 25% rule for non-grandfathered LTCH HIHs, non-grandfathered
satellites and grandfathered LTCH HIHs, as it applies to admissions from co-located hospitals. For
HIHs and satellite facilities, the applicable percentage threshold is set at 50% and not phased in
to the 25% level. For those HIHs and satellite facilities located in rural areas and those which
receive referrals from MSA dominant hospitals or single urban hospitals, the percentage threshold
is set at no more than 75%. The ARRA, as
discussed below further revises the SCHIP Extension Act to postpone the percentage limitations
established in the SCHIP Extension Act to the three cost reporting periods beginning on or after
July 1, 2007 for freestanding LTCHs, grandfathered HIHs and grandfathered satellites and on or
after October 1, 2007 for non-grandfathered LTCH HIHs and non-grandfathered satellites.
The SCHIP Extension Act also precludes the Secretary from implementing, for the three year
period beginning on December 29, 2007, a one-time adjustment to the LTCH standard federal rate.
This rule, established in the original LTCH-PPS regulations, permits CMS to restate the standard
federal rate to reflect the effect of changes in coding since the LTCH-PPS base year. In the
preamble to the May 2007 final rule, CMS discussed making a one-time prospective adjustment to the
LTCH-PPS rates for the 2009 rate year. In addition, the SCHIP Extension Act reduced the Medicare
payment update for the portion of RY 2008 from April 1, 2008 to June 30, 2008 to the same base rate
applied to LTCH discharges during RY 2007.
34
Table of Contents
For the three calendar years following December 29, 2007, the Secretary must impose a
moratorium on the establishment and classification of new LTCHs, LTCH satellite facilities, and
LTCH beds in existing LTCH or satellite facilities. This moratorium does not apply to LTCHs that,
before the date of enactment, (1) began the
qualifying period for payment under the LTCH-PPS, (2) have a written agreement with an
unrelated party for the construction, renovation, lease or demolition for a LTCH and have expended
at least 10% of the estimated cost of the project or $2,500,000, or (3) have obtained an approved
certificate of need. As a result of the SCHIP Extension Acts three calendar year moratorium on the
development of new LTCHs, we have stopped all new LTCH development.
May 6, 2008 Interim Final Rule. On May 6, 2008, CMS published an interim final rule with
comment period, which implemented portions of the SCHIP Extension Act. The May 6, 2008 interim
final rule addressed: (1) the payment adjustment for very short-stay outliers, (2) the standard
federal rate for the last three months of RY 2008, (3) adjustment of the high cost outlier
fixed-loss amount for the last three months of RY 2008, and (4) made references to the SCHIP
Extension Act in the discussion of the basis and scope of the LTCH-PPS rules.
May 9, 2008 Final Rule. On May 9, 2008, CMS published its annual payment rate update for the
2009 LTCH-PPS rate year, or RY 2009 (affecting discharges and cost reporting periods beginning on
or after July 1, 2008). The final rule adopts a 15-month rate update, from July 1, 2008 through
September 30, 2009 and moves LTCH-PPS from a July-June update cycle to the same update cycle as the
general acute care hospital inpatient rule (October September). For RY 2009, the rule
establishes a 2.7% update to the standard federal rate. The rule increases the fixed-loss amount
for high cost outlier cases to $22,960, which is $2,222 higher than the 2008 LTCH-PPS rate year.
The final rule provides that CMS may make a one-time reduction in the LTCH-PPS rates to reflect a
budget neutrality adjustment no earlier than December 29, 2010 and no later than October 1, 2012.
CMS estimated this reduction will be approximately 3.75%.
May 22, 2008 Interim Final Rule. On May 22, 2008, CMS published an interim final rule with
comment period, which implements portions of the SCHIP Extension Act not addressed in the May 6,
2008 interim final rule. Among other things, the May 22, 2008 interim final rule establishes a
definition for free-standing LTCHs as a hospital that: (1) has a Medicare provider agreement, (2)
has an average length of stay of greater than 25 days, (3) does not occupy space in a building used
by another hospital, (4) does not occupy space in one or more separate or entire buildings located
on the same campus as buildings used by another hospital and (5) is not part of a hospital that
provides inpatient services in a building also used by another hospital.
August 2008 Final Rule. On August 19, 2008, CMS published the IPPS final rule for FY 2009
(affecting discharges and cost reports beginning on or after October 1, 2008 and before October 1,
2009), which made limited revisions to the classifications of cases in MS-LTC-DRGs. The final rule
also includes a number of hospital ownership and physician referral provisions, including expansion
of a hospitals disclosure obligations by requiring physician-owned hospitals to disclose ownership
or investment interests held by immediate family members of a referring physician. The final rule
requires physician-owned hospitals to furnish to patients, on request, a list of physicians or
immediate family members who own or invest in the hospital. Moreover, a physician-owned hospital
must require all physician owners or investors who are also active members of the hospitals
medical staff to disclose in writing their ownership or investment interests in the hospital to all
patients they refer to the hospital. CMS can terminate the Medicare provider agreement of a
physician-owned hospital if it fails to comply with these disclosure provisions or with the
requirement that a hospital disclose in writing to all patients whether there is a physician
on-site at the hospital 24 hours per day, 7 days per week.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. On February 17, 2009, President Obama
signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the ARRA. The ARRA makes
several technical corrections to the SCHIP Extension Act, including a clarification that, during
the moratorium period established by the SCHIP Extension Act, the percentage threshold for
grandfathered satellites is set at 50% and not phased in to the 25% level for admissions from a
co-located hospital. In addition, the ARRA clarifies that the application of the percentage
threshold is postponed for a LTCH HIH or satellite that was co-located with a
provider-based, off-campus location of an IPPS hospital that did not deliver services payable
under IPPS. The ARRA also provides that the postponement of the percentage threshold established
in the SCHIP Extension Act will be effective for cost reporting periods beginning on or after July
1, 2007 for freestanding LTCHs and grandfathered HIHs and satellites and on or after October 1,
2007 for other LTCH HIHs and satellites.
35
Table of Contents
June 3, 2009 Interim Final Rule. On June 3, 2009, CMS published an interim final rule in
which CMS adopted a new table of MS-LTC-DRG relative weights that will apply to the remainder of
fiscal year 2009 (through September 30, 2009). This interim final rule revises the MS-LTC-DRG
relative weights for payment under the LTCH-PPS for FY 2009 due to CMSs misapplication of its
established methodology in the calculation of the budget neutrality factor. This error resulted in
relative weights that are higher, by approximately 3.9 percent for all of FY 2009 (October 1, 2008
through September 30, 2009) which has the effect of reducing reimbursement by approximately 3.9%.
However, CMS is only applying the corrected weights to the remainder of fiscal year 2009 (that is,
from June 3, 2009 through September 30, 2009).
July 31, 2009 Final Rule. On July 31, 2009, CMS released its annual payment rate update for
the LTCH PPS for FY 2010 (affecting discharges and cost reporting periods beginning on or after
October 1, 2009 and before September 30, 2010). For FY 2010 CMS adopted a 2.5% increase in
payments under the LTCH PPS. As a result, the standard federal rate for FY 2010 is set at
$39,896.65, an increase from $39,114.36 in FY 2009. The increase in the standard federal rate uses
a 2.0% update factor based on the market basket update of 2.5% less an adjustment of 0.5% to account
for changes in documentation and coding practices. The fixed loss amount for high cost outlier
cases is set at $18,425. This is a decrease from the fixed loss amount in the 2009 rate year of
$22,960.
The July 31, 2009 annual payment rate update also included an interim final rule with comment
period implementing provisions of the ARRA discussed above, including amendments to provisions of
the SCHIP Extension Act relating to payments to LTCHs and LTCH satellite facilities and increases
in beds in existing LTCHs and LTCH satellite facilities under the LTCH PPS.
In the same federal register, CMS finalized three interim final rules with comment period that
it previously published but had yet to respond to public comment. First, CMS finalized the June 3,
2009 interim final rule that adopted a new table of MS-LTC-DRG relative weights for the period
between June 3, 2009 and September 30, 2009. Second, CMS finalized the May 6, 2008 interim final
rule that implemented changes to LTCH PPS mandated by the SCHIP Extension Act addressing: (1)
payment adjustments for certain short-stay outliers, (2) the federal standard rate for the last
three months of rate year 2008, and (3) adjustment of the high cost outlier fixed-loss amount.
Finally, CMS finalized the May 22, 2008 interim final rule that implemented changes to LTCH PPS
mandated by the SCHIP Extension Act modifying the percentage threshold policy for certain LTCHs and
addressing the three-year moratorium on the establishment of new LTCHs and bed increases at
existing LTCHs and LTCH satellites.
Medicare Reimbursement of Outpatient Rehabilitation Services
CMS released the final rule for the 2009 Medicare physician fee schedule on October 30, 2008.
The final rule increased the annual per beneficiary cap on outpatient therapy services for 2009 to
$1,840 for combined physical therapy and speech language pathology services and $1,840 for
occupational therapy services. The per beneficiary cap was $1,810 for calendar year 2008. The
final rule also extended the therapy cap exceptions process through December 31, 2009 as authorized
by Congress.
36
Table of Contents
Medicare Reimbursement of Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Services
The following is a summary of significant changes to the Medicare prospective payment system
for inpatient rehabilitation facilities or IRF-PPS during 2008 and 2009.
August 2008 Final Rule. On August 8, 2008, CMS published the final rule for the inpatient
rehabilitation facility prospective payment system (IRF-PPS) for FY 2009. The final rule
included changes to the IRF-PPS regulations designed to implement portions of the SCHIP Extension
Act. In particular, the patient classification criteria compliance threshold was established at 60
percent (with comorbidities counting toward this threshold). In addition to updating the various
values that compose the IRF-PPS, the final rule updated the outlier threshold amount to $10,250
from $7,362 for fiscal year 2008.
July 31, 2009 Final Rule. On July 31, 2009, CMS released its final rule establishing the
annual payment rate update for the IRF-PPS for FY 2010 (affecting discharges and cost reporting
periods beginning on October 1, 2009 through September 30, 2010). The standard federal rate is
established at $13,661 for FY 2010, an increase from $12,958 in FY 2009. The proposed outlier
threshold amount is set at $10,652, an increase from $10,250 in FY 2009.
In the same final rule, CMS adopted new coverage criteria, including requirements for
preadmission screening, post-admission evaluations, and individualized treatment planning that
emphasize the role of physicians in ordering and overseeing beneficiaries IRF care. Among other
things, the rule requires IRF services to be ordered by a rehabilitation physician with specialized
training and experience in rehabilitation services and be coordinated by an interdisciplinary team
meeting the rules specifications. The interdisciplinary team must meet weekly to review the
patients progress and make any needed adjustments to the individualized plan of care. IRFs must
use qualified personnel to provide required rehabilitation nursing, physical therapy, occupational
therapy, speech-language pathology, social services, psychological services, and prosthetic and
orthotic services (CMS notes that it also is considering adopting specific standards on the use of
group therapies at a future date). The rule also includes new documentation requirements,
including a requirement that IRFs submit patient assessment data on Medicare Advantage patients.
While the final rules payment rate updates are effective for IRF discharges on or after
October 1, 2009, CMS has adopted a January 1, 2010 effective date for the new coverage requirements
to provide facilities more time to comply with the new framework. If we fail to implement the new
coverage criteria, claims for our services may be denied in whole or part.
Professional Licensure and Corporate Practice
Healthcare professionals at our hospitals and outpatient rehabilitation clinics are required
to be individually licensed or certified under applicable state law. We take steps to ensure that
our employees and agents possess all necessary licenses and certifications.
Some states prohibit the corporate practice of therapy so that business corporations such as
ours are restricted from practicing therapy through the direct employment of therapists. The laws
relating to corporate practice vary from state to state, and are not fully developed in each state
in which we have clinics. We believe that each of our outpatient therapy clinics complies with any
current corporate practice prohibition of the state in which it is located. For example, in those
states that apply the corporate practice prohibition, we either contract to obtain therapy services
from an entity permitted to employ therapists or we manage the physical therapy practice owned by
licensed therapists through which the therapy services are provided. However, in
those states where we furnish our services through business corporations, future
interpretations of the corporate practice prohibition, enactment of new legislation or adoption of
new regulations could have a material adverse effect on the business and operations of our
outpatient therapy clinics. If new legislation, regulations or interpretations establish that our
clinics do not comply with state corporate practice prohibition, we could be subject to civil, and
perhaps criminal, penalties, and may be required to restructure our business operations or close
our clinics in any such state.
37
Table of Contents
Facility Licensure, Certification and Accreditation
Our hospitals and outpatient rehabilitation clinics are subject to extensive and changing
federal, state and local regulations and private accreditation standards. Hospitals are required
to comply with state hospital standards setting requirements related to patient rights, composition
and responsibilities of the hospital governing body, medical staff, quality improvement, infection
control, nursing services, food and nutrition, medical records, drug distribution, diagnostic and
treatment services, surgical services, emergency services and social work. Our hospitals are also
required to meet conditions of participation under Medicare programs in order to qualify to receive
reimbursement under these programs. In addition, many of our hospitals and outpatient
rehabilitation clinics are accredited by The Joint Commission by voluntarily complying with a
specific set of accreditation standards.
Our hospitals and outpatient rehabilitation clinics are subject to inspections, surveys and
other reviews by governmental and private regulatory authorities, not only at scheduled intervals
but also in response to complaints from patients and others. While our hospitals and outpatient
rehabilitation clinics intend to comply with existing licensing, Medicare certification
requirements and accreditation standards, there can be no assurance that regulatory authorities
will determine that all applicable requirements are fully met at any given time. A determination
by an applicable regulatory authority that a facility is not in compliance with these requirements
could lead to the imposition of requirements that the facility takes corrective action, assessment
of fines and penalties or loss of licensure, Medicare certification or accreditation. These
consequences could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Federal Health Care Reform Proposals
Additional changes in federal health care policy have been proposed by President Obama and are
expected to be considered by Congress this year. Specifically, on February 26, 2009, the Obama
Administration released its proposed federal budget for fiscal year 2010, which would establish a
reserve fund of $633.8 billion over 10 years to finance comprehensive health reform. The reserve
fund would be paid for by tax increases and health system savings. Among other things, the plan
calls for bundled payments to hospitals that would cover not just the hospitalization, but care
from certain post-acute providers for the 30 days after the hospitalization. A significant portion
of the services furnished by our specialty hospitals and outpatient rehabilitation clinics are to
patients discharged from acute care hospitals. Therefore, the proposal to bundle payments to
hospitals could have a material impact on volume of referrals to our facilities by acute care
hospitals and the payment rates that we receive for our services.
On June 15, 2009, the Obama Administration released new proposals to cut an additional $313
billion from Medicare and Medicaid over 10 years, in addition to the provisions included in the
Administrations proposed fiscal year 2010 budget. Among other things, the Administration endorses
adopting the Medicare Payment Advisory Commissions recommendations for reducing payments in 2010
to inpatient rehabilitation facilities and long term care hospitals, including a proposal to reduce
payments to long term acute care hospitals by 1.8 percent. In addition, the Administration
endorses implementing additional prepayment reviews in order to cut waste, fraud, and abuse in the
federal health care programs.
38
Table of Contents
Operating Statistics
The following table sets forth operating statistics for our specialty hospitals and our
outpatient rehabilitation clinics for each of the periods presented. The data in the table reflect
the changes in the number of specialty hospitals and outpatient rehabilitation clinics we operate
that resulted from acquisitions, start-up activities and closures. The operating statistics reflect
data for the period of time these operations were managed by us.
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Specialty hospital data(1): |
||||||||||||||||
Hospitals start of period |
92 | 92 | 87 | 93 | ||||||||||||
Hospital start-ups |
| 1 | 5 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Hospitals acquired |
2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Hospitals consolidated |
(1 | ) | | (1 | ) | | ||||||||||
Hospitals closed |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||
Hospitals owned end of period |
92 | 93 | 92 | 93 | ||||||||||||
Hospitals managed end of period |
| 1 | | 1 | ||||||||||||
Total hospitals (all) end of period |
92 | 94 | 92 | 94 | ||||||||||||
Available licensed beds |
4,144 | 4,173 | 4,144 | 4,173 | ||||||||||||
Admissions |
9,977 | 10,466 | 30,891 | 31,775 | ||||||||||||
Patient days |
243,807 | 248,504 | 756,093 | 757,487 | ||||||||||||
Average length of stay (days) |
25 | 24 | 25 | 24 | ||||||||||||
Net revenue per patient day(2) |
$ | 1,446 | $ | 1,489 | $ | 1,434 | $ | 1,500 | ||||||||
Occupancy rate |
64 | % | 65 | % | 68 | % | 66 | % | ||||||||
Percent patient days Medicare |
65 | % | 65 | % | 66 | % | 65 | % | ||||||||
Outpatient rehabilitation data: |
||||||||||||||||
Clinics owned start of period |
894 | 875 | 918 | 880 | ||||||||||||
Clinics acquired |
3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Clinic start-ups |
3 | 2 | 12 | 9 | ||||||||||||
Clinics closed/sold |
(13 | ) | (6 | ) | (46 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||||
Clinics owned end of period |
887 | 873 | 887 | 873 | ||||||||||||
Clinics managed end of period |
78 | 74 | 78 | 74 | ||||||||||||
Total clinics (all) end of period |
965 | 947 | 965 | 947 | ||||||||||||
Visits |
1,106,529 | 1,126,096 | 3,430,138 | 3,385,733 | ||||||||||||
Net revenue per visit(3) |
$ | 101 | $ | 101 | $ | 102 | $ | 102 |
(1) | Specialty hospitals consist of long term acute care hospitals and inpatient rehabilitation facilities. | |
(2) | Net revenue per patient day is calculated by dividing specialty hospital inpatient service revenues by the total number of patient days. | |
(3) | Net revenue per visit is calculated by dividing outpatient rehabilitation clinic revenue by the total number of visits. For purposes of this computation, outpatient rehabilitation clinic revenue does not include contract services revenue. |
39
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following table outlines, for the periods indicated, selected operating data as a
percentage of net operating revenues:
Select Medical Holdings Corporation | Select Medical Corporation | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net operating revenues |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of services(1) |
85.0 | 82.3 | 85.0 | 82.3 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative(2) |
2.2 | 6.3 | 2.2 | 6.3 | ||||||||||||
Bad debt expense |
2.4 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 2.2 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
3.4 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
7.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | ||||||||||||
Gain on early retirement of debt |
| 0.2 | | | ||||||||||||
Other income |
| | 0.3 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(6.9 | ) | (6.1 | ) | (5.3 | ) | (4.6 | ) | ||||||||
Income from operations before income taxes |
0.1 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 1.8 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
0.0 | (0.2 | ) | 0.7 | 0.4 | |||||||||||
Net income |
0.1 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest |
0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Holdings and Select |
(0.1 | )% | 0.1 | % | 1.1 | % | 1.2 | % | ||||||||
Select Medical Holdings Corporation | Select Medical Corporation | |||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net operating revenues |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of services(1) |
83.6 | 81.2 | 83.6 | 81.2 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative(2) |
2.2 | 3.6 | 2.2 | 3.6 | ||||||||||||
Bad debt expense |
2.2 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
3.3 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
8.7 | 10.0 | 8.7 | 10.0 | ||||||||||||
Gain on early retirement of debt |
| 1.0 | | 0.9 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
| | (0.1 | ) | 0.2 | |||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(6.8 | ) | (6.1 | ) | (5.2 | ) | (4.5 | ) | ||||||||
Income from operations before
income taxes |
1.9 | 4.9 | 3.4 | 6.6 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
0.9 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
1.0 | 2.9 | 2.0 | 4.0 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to
non-controlling interest |
0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to
Holdings and Select |
0.9 | % | 2.8 | % | 1.9 | % | 3.9 | % | ||||||||
40
Table of Contents
The following tables summarize selected financial data by business segment, for the periods
indicated:
Select Medical Holdings Corporation | Select Medical Corporation | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | % Change | 2008 | 2009 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specialty hospitals |
$ | 358,838 | $ | 376,859 | 5.0 | % | $ | 358,838 | $ | 376,859 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Outpatient rehabilitation |
160,303 | 168,751 | 5.3 | 160,303 | 168,751 | 5.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
38 | 11 | (71.1 | ) | 38 | 11 | (71.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total company |
$ | 519,179 | $ | 545,621 | 5.1 | % | $ | 519,179 | $ | 545,621 | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specialty hospitals |
$ | 38,381 | $ | 53,896 | 40.4 | % | $ | 38,381 | $ | 53,896 | 40.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Outpatient rehabilitation |
10,212 | 14,616 | 43.1 | 10,212 | 14,616 | 43.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other (2) |
(12,435 | ) | (35,607 | ) | N/M | (12,435 | ) | (35,607 | ) | N/M | ||||||||||||||
Total company |
$ | 36,158 | $ | 32,905 | (9.0 | )% | $ | 36,158 | $ | 32,905 | (9.0 | )% | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA:(3) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specialty hospitals |
$ | 49,137 | $ | 64,381 | 31.0 | % | $ | 49,137 | $ | 64,381 | 31.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Outpatient rehabilitation |
16,405 | 20,898 | 27.4 | 16,405 | 20,898 | 27.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
(11,031 | ) | (12,236 | ) | (10.9 | ) | (11,031 | ) | (12,236 | ) | (10.9 | ) | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA margins:(3) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specialty hospitals |
13.7 | % | 17.1 | % | 24.8 | % | 13.7 | % | 17.1 | % | 24.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Outpatient rehabilitation |
10.2 | 12.4 | 21.6 | 10.2 | 12.4 | 21.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
N/M | N/M | N/M | N/M | N/M | N/M | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specialty hospitals |
$ | 1,900,485 | $ | 1,898,494 | $ | 1,900,485 | $ | 1,898,494 | ||||||||||||||||
Outpatient rehabilitation |
502,943 | 484,703 | 502,943 | 484,703 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
109,733 | 381,545 | 105,881 | 378,356 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total company |
$ | 2,513,161 | $ | 2,764,742 | $ | 2,509,309 | $ | 2,761,553 | ||||||||||||||||
Purchases of property and
equipment, net: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specialty hospitals |
$ | 5,997 | $ | 12,371 | $ | 5,997 | $ | 12,371 | ||||||||||||||||
Outpatient rehabilitation |
3,235 | 1,566 | 3,235 | 1,566 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
431 | 332 | 431 | 332 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total company |
$ | 9,663 | $ | 14,269 | $ | 9,663 | $ | 14,269 | ||||||||||||||||
41
Table of Contents
Select Medical Holdings Corporation | Select Medical Corporation | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | % Change | 2008 | 2009 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specialty hospitals |
$ | 1,104,731 | $ | 1,156,422 | 4.7 | % | $ | 1,104,731 | $ | 1,156,422 | 4.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Outpatient rehabilitation |
501,375 | 509,760 | 1.7 | 501,375 | 509,760 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
157 | 146 | (7.0 | ) | 157 | 146 | (7.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total company |
$ | 1,606,263 | $ | 1,666,328 | 3.7 | % | $ | 1,606,263 | $ | 1,666,328 | 3.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specialty hospitals |
$ | 134,985 | $ | 180,100 | 33.4 | % | $ | 134,985 | $ | 180,100 | 33.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Outpatient rehabilitation |
42,354 | 48,797 | 15.2 | 42,354 | 48,797 | 15.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other (2) |
(38,416 | ) | (62,978 | ) | (63.9 | ) | (38,416 | ) | (62,978 | ) | (63.9 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total company |
$ | 138,923 | $ | 165,919 | 19.4 | % | $ | 138,923 | $ | 165,919 | 19.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA:(3) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specialty hospitals |
$ | 167,617 | $ | 212,122 | 26.6 | % | $ | 167,617 | $ | 212,122 | 26.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Outpatient rehabilitation |
60,248 | 67,476 | 12.0 | 60,248 | 67,476 | 12.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
(34,070 | ) | (37,277 | ) | (9.4 | ) | (34,070 | ) | (37,277 | ) | (9.4 | ) | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA margins:(3) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specialty hospitals |
15.2 | % | 18.3 | % | 20.4 | % | 15.2 | % | 18.3 | % | 20.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Outpatient rehabilitation |
12.0 | 13.2 | 10.0 | 12.0 | 13.2 | 10.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
N/M | N/M | N/M | N/M | N/M | N/M | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specialty hospitals |
$ | 1,900,485 | $ | 1,898,494 | $ | 1,900,485 | $ | 1,898,494 | ||||||||||||||||
Outpatient rehabilitation |
502,943 | 484,703 | 502,943 | 484,703 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
109,733 | 381,545 | 105,881 | 378,356 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total company |
$ | 2,513,161 | $ | 2,764,742 | $ | 2,509,309 | $ | 2,761,553 | ||||||||||||||||
Purchases of property and
equipment, net: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specialty hospitals |
$ | 23,385 | $ | 27,748 | $ | 23,385 | $ | 27,748 | ||||||||||||||||
Outpatient rehabilitation |
10,048 | 6,575 | 10,048 | 6,575 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
2,337 | 927 | 2,337 | 927 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total company |
$ | 35,770 | $ | 35,250 | $ | 35,770 | $ | 35,250 | ||||||||||||||||
42
Table of Contents
The following tables reconcile same hospitals information:
Select Medical Holdings Corporation | Select Medical Corporation | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Net operating revenue |
||||||||||||||||
Specialty hospitals net operating revenue |
$ | 358,838 | $ | 376,859 | $ | 358,838 | $ | 376,859 | ||||||||
Less: Specialty hospitals in
development, opened or closed after
1/1/08 |
13,386 | 27,995 | 13,386 | 27,995 | ||||||||||||
Specialty hospitals same store net
operating revenue |
$ | 345,452 | $ | 348,864 | $ | 345,452 | $ | 348,864 | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA(3) |
||||||||||||||||
Specialty hospitals Adjusted EBITDA(3) |
$ | 49,137 | $ | 64,381 | $ | 49,137 | $ | 64,381 | ||||||||
Less: Specialty hospitals in
development, opened or closed after
1/1/08 |
(6,161 | ) | 1,265 | (6,161 | ) | 1,265 | ||||||||||
Specialty hospitals same store Adjusted EBITDA(3) |
$ | 55,298 | $ | 63,116 | $ | 55,298 | $ | 63,116 | ||||||||
All specialty hospitals Adjusted EBITDA margin(3) |
13.7 | % | 17.1 | % | 13.7 | % | 17.1 | % | ||||||||
Specialty hospitals same store Adjusted
EBITDA margin(3) |
16.0 | % | 18.1 | % | 16.0 | % | 18.1 | % |
Select Medical Holdings Corporation | Select Medical Corporation | |||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Net operating revenue |
||||||||||||||||
Specialty hospitals net operating revenue |
$ | 1,104,731 | $ | 1,156,422 | $ | 1,104,731 | $ | 1,156,422 | ||||||||
Less: Specialty hospitals in
development, opened or closed after
1/1/08 |
36,456 | 79,885 | 36,456 | 79,885 | ||||||||||||
Specialty hospitals same store net
operating revenue |
$ | 1,068,275 | $ | 1,076,537 | $ | 1,068,275 | $ | 1,076,537 | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA(3) |
||||||||||||||||
Specialty hospitals Adjusted EBITDA(3) |
$ | 167,617 | $ | 212,122 | $ | 167,617 | $ | 212,122 | ||||||||
Less: Specialty hospitals in
development, opened or closed after
1/1/08 |
(17,587 | ) | (992 | ) | (17,587 | ) | (992 | ) | ||||||||
Specialty hospitals same store Adjusted EBITDA(3) |
$ | 185,204 | $ | 213,114 | $ | 185,204 | $ | 213,114 | ||||||||
All specialty hospitals Adjusted EBITDA margin(3) |
15.2 | % | 18.3 | % | 15.2 | % | 18.3 | % | ||||||||
Specialty hospitals same store Adjusted
EBITDA margin(3) |
17.3 | % | 19.8 | % | 17.3 | % | 19.8 | % |
N/M | Not Meaningful. | |
(1) | Cost of services include salaries, wages and benefits, operating supplies, lease and rent expense and other operating costs. |
43
Table of Contents
(2) | Includes non-recurring charges related to Holdings initial public offering of $18.3 million in long term incentive compensation and $3.7 million in stock compensation expense related to the grant of restricted stock that vested in connection with our initial public offering. | |
(3) | We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, gain on early retirement of debt, other income (expense), stock compensation expense, long term incentive compensation and non-controlling interest. We believe that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA is important to investors because Adjusted EBITDA is used by management to evaluate financial performance and determine resource allocation for each of our operating units. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles. Items excluded from Adjusted EBITDA are significant components in understanding and assessing financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to, or substitute for, net income, cash flows generated by operations, investing or financing activities, or other financial statement data presented in the consolidated financial statements as indicators of financial performance or liquidity. Because Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and is thus susceptible to varying calculations, Adjusted EBITDA as presented may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. See footnote 10 to our interim unaudited consolidated financial statements for the period ended September 30, 2009 for a reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA as utilized by us in reporting our segment performance. |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
In the following discussion, we address the results of operations of Select and Holdings.
With the exception of incremental interest expense, gain on early
retirement of debt and income taxes, the results of operations of
Holdings are identical to those of Select. Therefore, discussion related to net operating revenue,
operating expenses, Adjusted EBITDA, income from operations and
non-controlling interest is identical for Holdings and Select.
Net Operating Revenues
Our net operating revenues increased by 5.1% to $545.6 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to $519.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Specialty Hospitals. Our specialty hospital net operating revenues increased by 5.0% to
$376.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $358.8 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2008. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, the hospitals
opened in 2008 increased net operating revenues by $15.7 million, and the hospitals acquired in
2008 and 2009 increased net operating revenues by $2.8 million. These increases were offset
partially by the loss of revenues from hospitals that closed during 2008 and 2009, which accounted
for $3.8 million of the difference in net operating revenues between the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2009. Net operating revenues for the specialty hospitals
opened as of January 1, 2008 and operated by us throughout both periods increased by $3.4 million
to $348.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, compared to $345.5 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2008. Our patient days for these same store hospitals decreased
1.1% which consisted of a decline in both our Medicare and non-Medicare patient days. The
occupancy percentage in our same store hospitals decreased to 67% for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 from 68% for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The effect on net
operating revenues from the decrease in patient days was offset by an increase in our average net
revenue per patient day. Our average net revenue per patient day in our same
store hospitals increased 1.9% to $1,477 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from
$1,450 for the three months ended September 30, 2008. This increase in net revenue per patient day
was primarily the result of an increase in the severity of the Medicare cases we treated.
44
Table of Contents
Outpatient Rehabilitation. Our outpatient rehabilitation net operating revenues increased
5.3% to $168.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $160.3 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2008. The increase is principally related to an increase in
contracted services based revenue. The number of patient visits in our outpatient rehabilitation
clinics increased 1.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to 1,126,096 visits compared
to 1,106,529 visits for the three months ended September 30, 2008. Net revenue per visit in our
clinics was $101 for both the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
Operating Expenses
Our
operating expenses increased by $29.8 million to $495.0 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to $465.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The
principal cause of this increase were compensation costs of
$22.0 million that we incurred associated with our initial
public offering of common stock. Our operating expenses include our cost of services, general and
administrative expense and bad debt expense. As a percentage of our net operating revenues, our
operating expenses were 90.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 89.6% for
the three months ended September 30, 2008. Our cost of services increased by 1.7% to $448.7
million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $441.4 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2008. A major component of these costs is our labor expense. This increase
was the result of an increase in the cost of services in both our specialty hospital and outpatient
rehabilitation segments. The increase in cost of services we experienced in the specialty hospital
segment was due to an increase in patient volume in the hospitals we opened or acquired in 2008.
The increase in cost of services we experienced in the outpatient rehabilitation segment was due to
the increase in contracted services based business. Another component of cost of services is
facility rent expense, which was $29.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009
compared to $27.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. General and
administrative expenses were $34.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared
to $11.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The increase in general and
administrative expenses is principally related to an $18.3 million payment under our Long Term Cash
Incentive Plan and $3.7 million in stock compensation expense related to the grant of restricted
stock that vested in connection with our initial public offering of common stock. Our bad debt
expense as a percentage of net operating revenues was 2.2% for the three months ended September 30,
2009 compared to 2.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Adjusted EBITDA
Specialty Hospitals. Adjusted EBITDA increased by 31.0% to $64.4 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $49.1 million for the three months ended September 30,
2008. Our Adjusted EBITDA margins increased to 17.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2009
from 13.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The hospitals opened as of January 1,
2008 and operated by us throughout both periods had Adjusted EBITDA of $63.1 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $7.8 million or 14.1% over the Adjusted EBITDA of
$55.3 million for these hospitals for the three months ended September 30, 2008. Our Adjusted
EBITDA margin in these same store hospitals increased to 18.1% for the three months ended September
30, 2009 from 16.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The principal reason for the
growth in our Adjusted EBITDA margin for these same store hospitals is an increase in our net
revenue per patient day due to an increase in the severity of our Medicare cases while we
controlled our costs related to these cases, and a reduction in bad debt expense. We also reduced
the Adjusted
EBITDA losses in our recently opened hospitals. Our hospitals opened during 2008 had Adjusted
EBITDA of $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to Adjusted EBITDA
losses of $5.7 million incurred for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
45
Table of Contents
Outpatient Rehabilitation. Adjusted EBITDA increased by 27.4% to $20.9 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $16.4 million for the three months ended September 30,
2008. Our Adjusted EBITDA margins increased to 12.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2009
from 10.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Other. The Adjusted EBITDA loss was $12.2 million for the three months ended September 30,
2009 compared to an Adjusted EBITDA loss of $11.0 million for the three months ended September 30,
2008 and is due to our general and administrative expenses. The increase of $1.2 million is
related to increases in non-salary related costs.
Income from Operations
For the three months ended September 30, 2009 we experienced income from operations of $32.9
million compared to $36.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease in
income from operations is due to the compensation costs of $22.0 million we incurred associated
with our initial public offering of common stock. This increase in costs was offset by increases
in income from operations in the hospitals opened as of January 1, 2008 and operated by us
throughout both periods, the hospitals we opened in 2008 and our outpatient rehabilitation segment.
Gain on Early Retirement of Debt
Select
Medical Holdings Corporation. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, we paid
approximately $6.5 million to repurchase and retire a portion of Holdings senior floating rate
notes. These notes had a carrying value of $7.7 million. A gain on early retirement of debt in the
amount of $1.1 million was recognized on the transaction, which was net of the write-off of
unamortized deferred financing costs related to the repurchased debt.
Interest Expense
Select Medical Corporation. Interest expense was $25.1 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to $27.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The
decrease in interest expense is related to lower average outstanding debt balances in 2009 and a
decline in interest rates.
Select Medical Holdings Corporation. Interest expense was $33.5 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 compared to $36.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
The decrease in interest expense is related to lower average outstanding debt balances in 2009 and
a decline in interest rates.
Income Taxes
Select Medical Corporation. We recorded income tax expense of $2.5 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009. The expense represented an effective tax rate of 24.9%. We
recorded income tax expense of $3.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The
expense represented an effective tax rate of 33.6%. In the three months ended September 30, 2009,
we resolved with the Internal Revenue Service additional deductions related to our 2005 tax return
that resulted in interest being paid to us by the Internal
Revenue Service. The total effect of this benefit is reflected in our effective tax rate for
this period. Had this settlement not occurred, our effective tax rate would have been
approximately 41.0% for the period.
46
Table of Contents
Select Medical Holdings Corporation. We recorded income tax benefit of $0.8 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2009. We recorded income tax benefit of $0.1 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2008. In both periods we had minimal income from operations before
income taxes. Because income taxes are estimated on an annualized basis, any changes in the
estimates are adjusted through the current period. The significant reduction in taxable income in
both periods resulted in adjustments that yield small tax benefits in the periods. Additionally
during the three months ended September 30, 2009 we resolved with the Internal Revenue Service
additional deductions related to our 2005 tax return that resulted in interest being paid to us by
the Internal Revenue Service. The total effect of this interest benefit is reflected in our
effective tax rate for this period.
Non-Controlling Interests
Non-controlling interests in consolidated earnings were $0.8 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and $1.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
In the following discussion, we address the results of operations of Select and Holdings.
With the exception of incremental interest expense, gain on early
retirement of debt and income taxes, the results of operations of
Holdings are identical to those of Select. Therefore, discussion related to net operating revenue,
operating expenses, Adjusted EBITDA, income from operations and
non-controlling interest is identical for Holdings and Select.
Net Operating Revenues
Our net operating revenues increased by 3.7% to $1,666.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to $1,606.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Specialty Hospitals. Our specialty hospital net operating revenues increased by 4.7% to
$1,156.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $1,104.7 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the hospitals
opened in 2008 increased net operating revenues by $50.0 million and the hospitals acquired in 2008
and 2009 increased net operating revenues by $9.6 million. These increases were offset partially
by the loss of revenues from hospitals that closed during 2008 and 2009, which accounted for $16.2
million of the difference in net operating revenues between the nine months ended September 30,
2008 and September 30, 2009. Net operating revenues for the specialty hospitals opened as of
January 1, 2008 and operated by us throughout both periods
increased by $8.3 million to $1,076.5
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to $1,068.3 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008. Our patient days for these same store hospitals decreased 3.2%
and was attributable to a decline in our Medicare patient days. The occupancy percentage in our
same store hospitals decreased to 69% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from 71% for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008. The effect on net operating revenues from the decrease in
patient days was offset by an increase in our average net revenue per patient day. Our average net
revenue per patient day in our same store hospitals increased 4.0% to $1,497 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 from $1,439 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This increase
in net revenue per patient day was primarily the result of an increase in the severity of the
Medicare cases we treated.
47
Table of Contents
Outpatient Rehabilitation. Our outpatient rehabilitation net operating revenues was $509.8
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $501.4 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. The increase in our outpatient rehabilitation net operating revenues is
due to an increase in contracted services based revenue resulting from new business offset by a
reduction in the net operating revenues generated by our outpatient rehabilitation clinics. The
number of patient visits in our outpatient rehabilitation clinics decreased 1.3% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 to 3,385,733 visits compared to 3,430,138 visits for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008. The decline in visits, which principally occurred during the
first quarter of 2009, was the result of various factors in numerous locations where we operate,
including staffing shortages and increased competition. Net revenue per visit in our clinics was
$102 for both the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
Operating Expenses
Our operating expenses increased by $32.9 million to $1,447.1 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 compared to $1,414.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
The principal cause of this increase were compensation costs of
$22.0 million that we incurred associated with
our initial public offering of common stock. Our operating expenses include our cost of services,
general and administrative expense and bad debt expense. As a percentage of our net operating
revenues, our operating expenses were 86.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared
to 88.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Our cost of services were $1,353.1 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $1,343.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. A major component of these costs is our labor expense. This increase was
principally the result of an increase in the cost of services in our specialty hospital segment.
The increase in cost of services we experienced in the specialty hospital segment was due to an
increase in patient volume in the hospitals we opened or acquired in 2008. Another component of
cost of services is facility rent expense, which was $87.4 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to $82.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. General
and administrative expenses were $60.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
compared to $35.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The increase of $24.4
million in general and administrative expense is primarily related to an $18.3 million payment
under our Long Term Cash Incentive Plan and $3.7 million in stock compensation expense related to
the grant of restricted stock that vested in connection with our initial public offering of common
stock. The remaining increase occurred in non-salary related operating expenses. Our bad debt
expense as a percentage of net operating revenues was 2.0% for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 compared to 2.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Adjusted EBITDA
Specialty Hospitals. Adjusted EBITDA increased by 26.6% to $212.1 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $167.6 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. Our Adjusted EBITDA margins increased to 18.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
from 15.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The hospitals opened as of January 1,
2008 and operated by us throughout both periods had Adjusted EBITDA of $213.1 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $27.9 million or 15.1% over the Adjusted EBITDA of
$185.2 million for these hospitals for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Our Adjusted
EBITDA margin in these same store hospitals increased to 19.8% for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 from 17.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The principal reason for the
growth in our Adjusted EBITDA margin for these same store hospitals is an increase in our net
revenue per patient day due to an increase in the severity of our Medicare cases while we
controlled our costs related to these cases. We also reduced the Adjusted EBITDA losses in our
recently
opened hospitals. Our hospitals opened during 2008 incurred Adjusted EBITDA losses of $1.6
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to Adjusted EBITDA losses of $17.9
million incurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
48
Table of Contents
Outpatient Rehabilitation. Adjusted EBITDA increased by 12.0% to $67.5 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $60.2 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. Our Adjusted EBITDA margins increased to 13.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
from 12.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA was
primarily the result of the growth in our contracted services outpatient business.
Other. The Adjusted EBITDA loss was $37.3 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 compared to an Adjusted EBITDA loss of $34.1 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 and is primarily related to our general and administrative expenses. The increase of $3.2
million is related to increases in non-salary related costs.
Income from Operations
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 we experienced income from operations of $165.9
million compared to $138.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The increase in
income from operations resulted primarily from the improved operating performance we experienced in
both the specialty hospitals opened in 2008 and the specialty hospitals opened as of January 1,
2008 and operated by us throughout both periods, and was offset by the compensation costs of $22.0
million we incurred associated with our initial public offering of common stock.
Gain on Early Retirement of Debt
Select
Medical Corporation. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we paid
approximately $30.1 million to repurchase and retire a portion of our 7 5/8% senior subordinated
notes. These notes had a carrying value of $46.5 million. A gain on early retirement of debt in
the amount of $15.3 million was recognized on the transactions which was net of the write-off of
unamortized deferred financing costs related to the repurchased debt.
Select
Medical Holdings Corporation. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we paid
approximately $30.1 million to repurchase and retire a portion of our 7 5/8% senior subordinated
notes. These notes had a carrying value of $46.5 million. A gain on early retirement of debt in
the amount of $15.3 million was recognized on the transactions which was net of the write-off of
unamortized deferred financing costs related to the debt. In addition for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, we paid approximately $6.5 million to repurchase and retire a portion of
Holdings senior floating rate notes. These notes have a carrying value of $7.7 million. A gain
on early retirement of debt in the amount of $1.1 million was recognized on the transaction which
was net of the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs
related to the repurchased debt.
Interest Expense
Select Medical Corporation. Interest expense was $75.9 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to $83.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The
decrease in interest expense is related to lower average outstanding debt balances in 2009 and a
decline in interest rates.
Select Medical Holdings Corporation. Interest expense was $101.8 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 compared to $109.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
The decrease in interest expense is related to lower average outstanding debt balances in 2009 and
a decline in interest rates.
49
Table of Contents
Income Taxes
Select Medical Corporation. We recorded income tax expense of $43.1 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009. The expense represented an effective tax rate of 39.4%. We
recorded income tax expense of $22.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The
expense represented an effective tax rate of 41.4%. The reduction in the effective tax rate for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is principally due to a reduction in the reserve for
uncertain tax positions, a reduction in the accrued interest and penalties associated with these
uncertain tax positions, a reduction in valuation reserves recorded related to estimated unusable
state net operating losses, estimated interest to be received on additional deductions being
allowed by the Internal Revenue Service on our 2005 tax return and the smaller relative effect that
permanent items have on the effective tax rate due to the increase in our taxable income.
Select Medical Holdings Corporation. We recorded income tax expense of $33.1 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009. The expense represented an effective tax rate of 41.0%. We
recorded income tax expense of $13.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The
expense represented an effective tax rate of 46.8%. The reduction in the effective tax rate for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is principally due to a reduction in the reserve for
uncertain tax positions, a reduction in the accrued interest and penalties associated with these
uncertain tax positions, a reduction in valuation reserves recorded related to estimated unusable
state net operating losses, estimated interest to be received on additional deductions being
allowed by the Internal Revenue Service on our 2005 tax return and the smaller relative effect that
permanent items have on the effective tax rate due to the increase in our taxable income.
Non-Controlling Interests
Non-controlling interests in consolidated earnings were $2.2 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and $2.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table summarizes the statement of cash flows of Holdings and Select for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009:
Select Medical Holdings Corporation | Select Medical Corporation | |||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Cash flows provided by operating activities |
$ | 33,973 | $ | 93,447 | $ | 66,779 | $ | 126,266 | ||||||||
Cash flows used in investing activities |
(40,578 | ) | (34,290 | ) | (40,578 | ) | (34,290 | ) | ||||||||
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing
activities |
11,443 | 157,075 | (21,363 | ) | 124,256 | |||||||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
4,838 | 216,232 | 4,838 | 216,232 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
4,529 | 64,260 | 4,529 | 64,260 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 9,367 | $ | 280,492 | $ | 9,367 | $ | 280,492 | ||||||||
Operating activities for Select provided $126.3 million and $66.8 million of cash flow for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, respectively. The principal reason for
the increase in our operating cash flow was the increase in our net income, a smaller increase in
our accounts receivable and the
use of federal net operating losses to minimize our tax payments during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. Our days sales outstanding were 52 days at September 30, 2009 compared to 53
days at December 31, 2008. Our days sales outstanding were 55 days at September 30, 2008 compared
to 48 days at December 31, 2007.
50
Table of Contents
The operating cash flow of Select exceeds the operating cash flow of Holdings by $32.8 million
for both the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
The difference relates to interest payments on Holdings senior subordinated notes and senior
floating rate notes.
Investing activities used $34.3 million of cash flow for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. The use of cash was $35.3 million related to the purchase of property and equipment and $0.4
million in acquisition related payments, offset by $1.3 million of proceeds from the sale of
property. Investing activities used $40.6 million of cash flow for the nine months ended September
30, 2008. The primary use of cash in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $35.8 million
related to the purchase of property and equipment and $7.4 million related to the acquisition of
businesses and the final settlement of the purchase price for the acquisition of the outpatient
rehabilitation division of HealthSouth Corporation. These cash outflows were offset by proceeds of
$2.6 million related to the sale of a minority interest in a specialty hospital and sale of real
property.
Financing activities for Select provided $124.3 million of cash flow for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. The primary source of cash related to $282.0
in net proceeds from Holdings initial
public offering of common stock offset by the repurchase of a portion
of Selects 7 5/8% senior
subordinated notes for $30.1 million, repayment of bank overdrafts of $21.1 million, net payments
on our senior secured credit facility of $65.0 million, dividends paid to Holdings to fund interest
payments of $39.4 million, $2.5 million in distributions to non-controlling interests and net
payments related to seller and other debt of $0.6 million. Financing activities used $21.4 million
of cash flow for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The primary usage of cash related to
dividends paid to Holdings to fund interest payments of $33.4 million, repayment of bank overdrafts
of $7.2 million, principal payments on seller and other debt of $4.0 million and distributions to
minority interests of $1.7 million offset by borrowings, net of repayments, on our senior secured
credit facility of $24.9 million. The net borrowings on our senior secured credit facility were
used to fund the slow-down we experienced in our collection of accounts receivable and our purchase
of property and equipment.
The difference in cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities of Holdings compared
to Select of $32.8 million for both the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 relates to dividends paid by Select to Holdings to service Holdings
interest obligations related to its senior subordinated notes and its senior floating rate notes
and to fund repurchases of common and preferred stock.
Capital Resources
Select Medical Corporation. Select had net working capital of $234.3 million at September 30,
2009 compared to net working capital of $100.1 million at December 31, 2008. The principal reason
for the increase is due to the cash received upon the closing of
Holdings initial public offering of
common stock on September 30, 2009 offset by the increase in the current portion of long term debt
that resulted from the mandatory repayment obligation that was triggered under our senior secured
credit facility upon the consummation of the initial public offering.
Select Medical Holdings Corporation. Holdings had net working capital of $231.4 million at
September 30, 2009 compared to net working capital of $118.4 million at December 31, 2008. The
principal reason for the
increase is due to the cash received upon the closing of our initial public offering of common
stock on September 30, 2009 offset by the increase in the current portion of long term debt that
resulted from the mandatory repayment obligation that was triggered under our senior secured credit
facility upon the consummation of the initial public offering.
51
Table of Contents
After giving effect to Amendment No. 3 to our senior secured credit facility (as described
below), our senior secured credit facility provides for senior secured financing of up to $980.0
million, consisting of:
| a $300.0 million revolving loan facility that will terminate on February 24, 2011, including both a letter of credit sub-facility and a swingline loan sub-facility, and |
| $268.6 million in term loans that mature on February 24, 2012 (the Tranche B Term Loans), and |
| $384.5 million in term loans that mature on August 22, 2014 (the Tranche B-1 Term Loans). |
The interest rates per annum applicable to loans, other than swingline loans and Tranche B-1
Term Loans, under our senior secured credit facility are, at our option, equal to either an
alternate base rate or an adjusted LIBOR rate for a one, two, three or six month interest period,
or a nine or twelve month period if available, in each case, plus an applicable margin percentage.
The interest rates per annum applicable to the Tranche B-1 Term Loans under our senior credit
facility are, at our option, equal to either an alternate base rate or an adjusted LIBOR rate for a
three or six month interest period, or a nine or twelve month period if available, in each case,
plus an applicable margin percentage. The alternate base rate is the greater of (1) JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A.s prime rate and (2) one-half of 1% over the weighted average of rates on overnight
Federal funds as published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The adjusted LIBOR rate is
determined by reference to settlement rates established for deposits in dollars in the London
interbank market for a period equal to the interest period of the loan and the maximum reserve
percentages established by the Board of Governors of the United States Federal Reserve to which our
lenders are subject. The applicable margin percentage for borrowings under our revolving loans is
subject to change based upon the ratio of Selects total indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA (as
defined in the credit agreement). The applicable margin percentage for revolving loans is
currently (1) 1.50% for alternate base rate loans and (2) 2.50% for adjusted LIBOR loans. The
applicable margin percentages for the Tranche B Term Loans are (1) 1.00% for alternate base rate
loans and (2) 2.00% for adjusted LIBOR loans. The applicable margin percentages for the Tranche B-1
Term Loans are (1) 2.75% for alternate base rate loans and (2) 3.75% for adjusted LIBOR loans.
Our senior secured credit facility requires Select to maintain certain interest expense
coverage ratios and leverage ratios which become more restrictive over time. For the four
consecutive fiscal quarters ended September 30, 2009, Select was required to maintain an interest
expense coverage ratio (its ratio of consolidated EBITDA (as defined in our senior secured credit
facility) to cash interest expense) for the prior four consecutive fiscal quarters of at least 2.00
to 1.00. Selects interest expense coverage ratio was 2.47 to 1.00 for such period. As of
September 30, 2009, Select was required to maintain its leverage ratio (its ratio of total
indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA for the prior four consecutive fiscal quarters) at less than
5.00 to 1.00. Selects leverage ratio was 3.89 to 1.00 as of September 30, 2009.
Also, as of September 30, 2009, we had $179.1 million of availability under our revolving loan
facility (after giving effect to $30.9 million of outstanding letters of credit).
Our initial public offering of common stock triggered the mandatory prepayment obligation
under our senior secured credit facility in the amount of 50% of the net proceeds we received in
the offering. On October 5, 2009 we repaid to the lenders under the senior secured credit facility
$139.4 million, of which $57.3 million
was applied to Tranche B term loans and $82.1 million was applied to Tranche B-1 term loans.
On October 16, 2009, we made an additional $12.1 million voluntary prepayment of Tranche B Term
Loans with a portion of the initial public offering proceeds.
52
Table of Contents
On October 28, 2009, the underwriters purchased an additional 3,602,700 shares pursuant to
their over-allotment option. We received $33.9 million of net proceeds from the exercise of the
over-allotment option. On November 3, 2009 we repaid $16.9 million of debt under our senior
secured credit facility, of which $6.7 million was applied to Tranche B term loans and $10.2
million was applied to Tranche B-1 term loans.
On June 13, 2005, Select entered into a five year interest rate swap transaction with an
effective date of August 22, 2005. On March 8, 2007 and November 23, 2007, Select entered into two
additional interest rate swap transactions for three years with effective dates of May 22, 2007 and
November 23, 2007, respectively. The swaps are designated as a cash flow hedge of forecasted
LIBOR-based variable rate interest payments. The underlying variable rate debt is $500.0 million.
On August 5, 2009 we entered into Amendment No. 3 to our senior secured credit facility with a
group of holders of Tranche B term loans and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent.
Amendment No. 3 extended the maturity of $384.5 million principal amount of Tranche B term loans
from February 24, 2012 to August 22, 2014, and made related technical changes to our senior secured
credit facility. Holders of Tranche B term loans that extended the maturity of their Tranche B
term loans now hold Tranche B-1 term loans that mature on August 22, 2014, and holders of Tranche B
term loans that did not extend the maturity of their Tranche B term loans continue to hold Tranche
B term loans that mature on February 24, 2012. The applicable margin percentage for the Tranche
B-1 term loans under our senior secured credit facility is 3.75% for adjusted LIBOR loans and 2.75%
for alternate base rate loans. Under the terms of Amendment No. 3, if, prior to August 5, 2011, our
senior secured credit facility is amended to reduce the applicable margin percentage for the
Tranche B-1 term loans, then we will be required to pay a fee in an amount equal to 1% of the
outstanding Tranche B-1 term loans held by those holders of Tranche B-1 term loans that agree to
amend our senior secured credit facility to reduce the applicable margin percentage. In addition,
if, prior to August 5, 2011, we make any prepayment of Tranche B-1 term loans with proceeds of any
term loan indebtedness, we will be required to pay a fee to holders of Tranche B-1 term loans in an
amount equal to 1% of the outstanding Tranche B-1 term loans that are being prepaid.
On February 24, 2005, EGL Acquisition Corp. issued and sold $660.0 million in aggregate
principal amount of 75/8% senior subordinated notes due 2015, which Select
assumed in connection with the Merger. The net proceeds of the offering were used to finance a
portion of the funds needed to consummate the Merger with EGL Acquisition Corp. The notes were
issued under an indenture between EGL Acquisition Corp. and U.S. Bank Trust National Association,
as trustee. Interest on the notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on February 1 and August 1 of
each year. The notes are guaranteed by all of Selects wholly-owned subsidiaries, subject to
certain exceptions. On or after February 1, 2010, the notes may be redeemed at Selects option, in
whole or in part, at redemption prices that decline annually to 100% on and after February 1, 2013,
plus accrued and unpaid interest. Upon a change of control of Holdings, each holder of notes may
require us to repurchase all or any portion of the holders notes at a purchase price equal to 101%
of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase.
During the first and second quarter of 2009, we paid approximately $30.1 million to repurchase
and retire additional 7 5/8% senior subordinated notes. These notes had a carrying value of $46.5
million. A gain on early retirement of debt in the amount of $15.3 million was recognized, which
was net of the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs related to the debt.
53
Table of Contents
On September 29, 2005, Holdings sold $175.0 million of senior floating rate notes due 2015,
which bear interest at a rate per annum, reset semi-annually, equal to the 6-month LIBOR plus
5.75%. Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15 of each year, with
the principal due in full on September 15, 2015. The senior floating rate notes are general
unsecured obligations of Holdings and are not guaranteed by Select or any of its subsidiaries. The
net proceeds of the issuance of the senior floating rate notes, together with cash was used to
reduce the amount of our preferred stock, to make a payment to participants in our long-term
incentive plan and to pay related fees and expenses.
During the third quarter of 2009, we paid approximately $6.5 million to repurchase and retire
a portion of Holdings senior floating rate notes. These notes had a carrying value of $7.7
million. A gain on early retirement of debt in the amount of $1.1 million was recognized, which
was net of the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs related to the debt.
We may from time to time seek to retire or purchase our outstanding debt through cash
purchases and/or exchanges for equity securities, in open market purchases, privately negotiated
transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, may be funded from operating
cash flows or other sources and will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity
requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.
We believe our internally generated cash flows and borrowing capacity under our senior secured
credit facility will be sufficient to finance operations for the foreseeable future. Our lenders,
including the lenders participating in our senior secured credit facility, may have suffered losses
related to their lending and other financial relationships, especially because of the general
weakening of the national economy, increased financial instability of many borrowers and the
declining value of their assets. As a result, lenders may become insolvent or tighten their
lending standards, which could make it more difficult for us to borrow under our revolving credit
facility, refinance our existing indebtedness or to obtain other financing on favorable terms or at
all. Our access to funds under the senior secured credit facility is dependent upon the ability of
our lenders to meet their funding commitments. Our financial condition and results of operations
would be adversely affected if we were unable to draw funds under our senior secured credit
facility because of a lender default or to obtain other cost-effective financing.
Longer term disruptions in the capital and credit markets as a result of uncertainty, changing
or increased regulation, reduced alternatives or failures of significant financial institutions
could adversely affect our access to liquidity needed for our business. Any disruption could
require us to take measures to conserve cash until the markets stabilize or until alternative
credit arrangements or other funding for our business can be arranged. Such measures could include
deferring capital expenditures and reducing or eliminating other discretionary uses of cash.
As a result of the SCHIP Extension Act, which prohibits the establishment and classification
of new LTCHs or satellites during the three calendar years commencing on December 29, 2007, we have
stopped all new LTCH development. However, we continue to evaluate opportunities to develop
rehabilitation hospitals. We also intend to open new outpatient rehabilitation clinics in local
areas that we currently serve where we can benefit from existing referral relationships and brand
awareness to produce incremental growth.
Inflation
The healthcare industry is labor intensive. Wages and other expenses increase during periods
of inflation and when labor shortages occur in the marketplace. In addition, suppliers pass along
rising costs to us in the form of higher prices. We have implemented cost control measures,
including our case and resource management
program, to curtail increases in operating costs and expenses. We cannot predict our ability
to cover or offset future cost increases.
54
Table of Contents
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update 2009-05, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) Measuring Liabilities at
Fair Value (Update 2009-05). Update 2009-05 provides clarification that in circumstances in which
a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity
is required to measure fair value of such liability using one or more of the techniques prescribed
by the update. Update 2009-05 is effective for the first annual or interim period beginning after
the issuance of this update. The adoption of Update 2009-05 is not anticipated to have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) topic
105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The amendment stipulates the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification is the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be
applied by nongovernmental entities. The amendment was effective for financial statements issued
for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of this amendment did
not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, FASB issued an amendment to ASC topic 810, Consolidation. The amendment
changes how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is
not controlled through voting or similar rights should be consolidated. The amendment will require
a reporting entity to provide additional disclosures about its involvement with variable interest
entities and any significant changes in risk exposure related to that involvement. The amendment
is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The
adoption of the amendment is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC topic 860, Transfers and Servicing. The
amendment will require additional disclosure about the transfers of financial assets, including
securitization transactions, and additional disclosure in cases where entities have continuing
exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. The amendment eliminates the
concept of qualifying special-purpose entity and changes the requirements for derecognizing
financial assets. The amendment is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning
after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a material impact
on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC topic 855, Subsequent Events. The amendment
provides general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance
sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The amendment
sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity
should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in
the financial statements. The amendment also sets forth the circumstances under which an entity
should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial
statements. Furthermore, this amendment identifies the disclosures that an entity should make
about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. We adopted this amendment
during the second quarter of 2009 and evaluated subsequent events
through November 13, 2009, the
issuance date of this report.
55
Table of Contents
In April 2009, FASB issued an amendment to ASC topic 805, Business Combinations. This
amendment changes the provisions for the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent
measurement and accounting
and disclosures for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in business
combinations. The amendment eliminates the distinction between contractual and non-contractual
contingencies, including the initial recognition and measurement criteria. The amendment is
effective for contingent assets and contingent liabilities acquired in business combinations for
which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures. This amendment provides additional guidance for estimating fair value when the volume
and level of activity for the asset or liability have decreased significantly. The amendment also
provides guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. The
amendment was effective for our interim period ending on June 30, 2009. The adoption of this
amendment did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2009, we adopted an amendment issued by the FASB in December 2007 to ASC topic
810, Consolidation. Upon adoption of this amendment, minority interest is now referred to as
non-controlling interest and has been reclassified from the mezzanine section of the balance sheet
to the equity section. The balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 has been revised to show this
change in presentation. In addition, non-controlling interest is now deducted from net income to
obtain net income attributable to each of Holdings and Select.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with our long-term indebtedness. Our
principal interest rate exposure relates to the loans outstanding under Selects senior secured
credit facility and Holdings senior floating rate notes. As of September 30, 2009, Select had
$741.5 million in term and revolving loans outstanding under its senior secured credit facility and
$167.3 million in senior floating rate notes outstanding, which bear interest at variable rates. On
June 13, 2005, Select entered into a five year interest rate swap transaction with an effective
date of August 22, 2005. On March 8, 2007 and November 16, 2007, Select entered into two additional
interest rate swap transactions for three years with effective dates of May 22, 2007 and November
23, 2007, respectively. Select entered into the swap transactions to mitigate the risks of future
variable rate interest payments. The notional amount of the interest rate swaps are $500.0 million
and the underlying variable rate debt is associated with the senior secured credit facility. Each
eighth point change in interest rates on the variable rate portion of our long-term indebtedness
would result in a $0.5 million annual change in interest expense on our term loans.
ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered in this report. Based on this
evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures, including the accumulation and communication of disclosure to
our principal executive officer and principal financial officer as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding disclosure, are effective to provide reasonable assurance that material
information required to be included in our periodic SEC reports is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the relevant SEC rules and forms.
56
Table of Contents
During the period covered by this report, there has been no change to our internal control
over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
To cover claims arising out of the operations of the Companys specialty hospitals and
outpatient rehabilitation facilities, the Company maintains professional malpractice liability
insurance and general liability insurance. The Company also maintains umbrella liability insurance
covering claims which, due to their nature or amount, are not covered by or not fully covered by
the Companys other insurance policies. These insurance policies also do not generally cover
punitive damages and are subject to various deductibles and policy limits. Significant legal
actions as well as the cost and possible lack of available insurance could subject the Company to
substantial uninsured liabilities.
The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of
business, which include malpractice claims covered under insurance policies, subject to
self-insured retention of $2.0 million per medical incident for professional liability claims and
$2.0 million per occurrence for general liability claims. In the Companys opinion, the outcome of
these actions will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of
operations.
Health care providers are subject to lawsuits under the qui tam provisions of the federal
False Claims Act. Qui tam lawsuits typically remain under seal (hence, usually unknown to the
defendant) for some time while the government decides whether or not to intervene on behalf of a
private qui tam plaintiff (known as a relator) and take the lead in the litigation. These lawsuits
can involve significant monetary damages and penalties and award bounties to private plaintiffs who
successfully bring the suits. The Company has been a defendant in these cases in the past, and may
be named as a defendant in similar cases from time to time in the future.
During July 2009, the Company received a subpoena from the Office of Inspector General of the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services seeking various documents concerning the Companys
financial relationships with certain physicians practicing at its hospitals in Columbus, Ohio. The
Company does not know whether the subpoena has been issued in connection with a qui tam lawsuit or
in connection with possible civil, criminal or administrative proceedings by the government. The
Company has produced documents in response to the subpoena and intends to fully cooperate with this
investigation. At this time, the Company is unable to predict the timing and outcome of this
matter.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
There have been no material changes from our risk factors as previously reported in our
Registration Statement on Form S-1 originally filed on July 24, 2008, as amended (Registration No.
333-152514).
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
On August 12, 2009, we awarded to certain of our employees an aggregate of 363,608 shares of
our restricted common stock under the Select Medical Holdings Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive
Plan, as amended and restated. These shares vested upon the consummation of our initial public
offering.
57
Table of Contents
Use of Proceeds from Initial Public Offering
On September 24, 2009, our registration statement on Form S-1 originally filed on July 24,
2008 (File No. 333-152514) was declared effective, pursuant to which Holdings issued and sold (1)
30,000,000 shares of common stock for aggregate gross offering proceeds of $300.0 million at a
price to the public of $10.00 per share, which closed on September 30, 2009, and (2) an additional
3,602,700 shares of common stock to the underwriters pursuant to their over-allotment option for
aggregate gross offering proceeds of approximately $36.0 million at a price to the public of $10.00
per share, which closed on October 28, 2009. The managing underwriters were Goldman, Sachs & Co.,
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and J.P.
Morgan Securities Inc.
We paid to the underwriters underwriting discounts and commissions totaling approximately
$20.1 million in connection with the offering. In addition, through November 3, 2009, we incurred
additional costs of approximately $2.9 million in connection with the offering which, when added to
the underwriting discounts and commissions paid by Holdings, resulted in total expenses of
approximately $23.0 million related to the offering. Accordingly, the net proceeds to Holdings from
the offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses, were
approximately $313.0 million. Except for the payments to executive officers under our Long Term
Cash Incentive Plan described below, no amounts, including offering expenses, were paid directly or
indirectly to any of our directors or officers (or their associates) or persons owning ten percent
or more of any class of Holdings equity securities or to any other affiliates from the proceeds of
the offering.
Holdings used the net proceeds from the offering to repay $258.4 million of indebtedness and
to make payments of $18.3 million to its executive officers under our Long Term Cash Incentive
Plan, and will use the remaining net proceeds from the offering to repay additional indebtedness or
for general corporate purposes. There has been no material change in the planned use of proceeds
from our initial public offering from that described in the Prospectus filed on September 25, 2009
with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Effective as of August 12, 2009, our stockholders approved the following matters by written
consent in connection with our initial public offering of common stock: (1) the restatement of the
certificate of incorporation of Holdings to become effective upon the consummation of our initial
public offering of common stock, (2) the amendment and restatement of the bylaws of Holdings to
become effective upon the consummation of our initial public offering of common stock, (3) the
amendment and restatement of the Select Medical Holdings Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, as
amended, to become effective immediately prior to the consummation of our initial public offering
of common stock, (4) the amendment and restatement of the Select Medical Holdings Corporation 2005
Equity Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended, to become effective immediately prior
to the consummation of our initial public offering of common stock, and (5) the waiver of the
rights of the preferred stockholders under the certificate of incorporation of Holdings to approve
the filing of any registration statement filed by Holdings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission in connection with our initial public offering of common stock. These matters were
approved by the written consent of a majority of the stockholders of Holdings on August 12, 2009.
The stockholders of Holdings that
did not approve these matters received notice of the action taken by written consent of a
majority of the stockholders of Holdings as required by the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.
58
Table of Contents
Effective as of September 17, 2009, our stockholders approved the following matters by written
consent in connection with our initial public offering of common stock: (1) a plan of
recapitalization, pursuant to which the holders of Holdings common stock exchanged each share of
common stock then outstanding for 0.30 of a share of Holdings common stock, effective immediately
upon the filing of the certificate of amendment to the amended and restated certificate of
incorporation of Holdings (referenced below) with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware,
and (2) the filing of the certificate of amendment to the amended and restated certificate of
incorporation of Holdings with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware permitting the plan
of recapitalization referenced above and the conversion of the preferred stock into common stock at
the time of the consummation of our initial public offering of common stock without the cash
payment of accrued dividends or the subsequent redemption of common stock. These matters were
approved by the written consent of a majority of the stockholders of Holdings on September 17,
2009. The stockholders of Holdings that did not approve these matters received notice of the
action taken by written consent of a majority of the stockholders of Holdings as required by the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
The
exhibits to this report are listed in the Exhibit Index appearing on page 61 hereof.
59
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATION | ||||||
By: | /s/ Martin F. Jackson | |||||
Martin F. Jackson |
||||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||||
(Duly Authorized Officer) | ||||||
By: | /s/ Scott A. Romberger | |||||
Scott A. Romberger | ||||||
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller | ||||||
(Principal Accounting Officer) | ||||||
Dated:
November 13, 2009 |
||||||
SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION | ||||||
By: | /s/ Martin F. Jackson | |||||
Martin F. Jackson |
||||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||||
(Duly Authorized Officer) | ||||||
By: | /s/ Scott A. Romberger | |||||
Scott A. Romberger | ||||||
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and
Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |
||||||
Dated:
November 13, 2009 |
60
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | Description | |||
1.1 | Underwriting Agreement, dated September 25, 2009, by and among
Select Medical Holdings Corporation and Goldman, Sachs & Co.,
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner &
Smith Incorporated and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as
representatives of the several underwriters named therein,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of Select Medical
Holdings Corporation and Select Medical Corporations Current
Report on Form 8-K filed October 1, 2009. |
|||
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|||
31.2 | Certification of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|||
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
61