Attached files

file filename
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - TECHWELL INCa09-30998_1ex31d1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - TECHWELL INCa09-30998_1ex31d2.htm
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - TECHWELL INCa09-30998_1ex32d2.htm
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - TECHWELL INCa09-30998_1ex32d1.htm

Table of Contents

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-Q
 

(Mark One)

 

x

 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2009

 

OR

 

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Transition Period From                      To                 

 

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-52014

 


 

Techwell, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

 

77-0451738

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

408 E. Plumeria Drive

San Jose, CA  94134

(Address of principal executive offices, including Zip Code)

 

(408) 435-3888

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x  No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large Accelerated filer o

 

Accelerated filer x

 

 

 

Non-Accelerated filer o

 

Smaller Reporting Company o

(Do not check if smaller reporting company)

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act). Yes o No x

 

As of October 31, 2009, 21,659,281 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

TECHWELL, INC.

FORM 10-Q

September 30, 2009

 

 

Page

 

 

Part I. Financial Information

3

 

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

3

Condensed Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008

3

Condensed Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008

4

Condensed Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008

5

Notes to Condensed Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

6

 

 

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

15

 

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

25

 

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

25

 

 

Part II. Other Information

26

 

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

26

 

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

26

 

 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

38

 

 

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

38

 

 

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

38

 

 

Item 5. Other Information

38

 

 

Item 6. Exhibits

38

 

 

Signatures

39

 

2



Table of Contents

 

PART I. Financial Information

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

 

TECHWELL, INC.

CONDENSED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except par value amount)

 

 

 

September 30,
2009

 

December 31,
2008

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

16,027

 

$

44,485

 

Short-term investments

 

48,089

 

17,582

 

Accounts receivable

 

977

 

1,985

 

Inventory

 

6,706

 

4,780

 

Deferred income tax assets

 

1,322

 

1,353

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

1,972

 

1,200

 

Total current assets

 

75,093

 

71,385

 

Property and equipment, net

 

1,063

 

1,290

 

Long-term investments

 

26,053

 

19,350

 

Deferred income tax assets

 

3,873

 

4,031

 

Other assets

 

243

 

1,308

 

TOTAL ASSETS

 

$

106,325

 

$

97,364

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

4,450

 

$

2,221

 

Accrued liabilities

 

3,985

 

2,117

 

Total current liabilities

 

8,435

 

4,338

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred rent

 

81

 

122

 

Total liabilities

 

8,516

 

4,460

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingencies (see Note 9)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000 shares authorized and no shares issued and outstanding

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.001 par value; 250,000 shares authorized; 21,633 shares and 21,347 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively

 

22

 

21

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

84,985

 

80,240

 

Deferred stock-based compensation

 

 

(19

)

Retained earnings

 

12,439

 

12,493

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

363

 

169

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

97,809

 

92,904

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

$

106,325

 

$

97,364

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

3



Table of Contents

 

TECHWELL, INC.

CONDENSED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

18,015

 

$

18,520

 

$

40,392

 

$

51,133

 

Cost of revenues

 

7,035

 

6,859

 

15,977

 

19,423

 

Gross profit

 

10,980

 

11,661

 

24,415

 

31,710

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

5,274

 

4,442

 

13,907

 

12,199

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

3,835

 

3,576

 

11,090

 

11,033

 

Total operating expenses

 

9,109

 

8,018

 

24,997

 

23,232

 

Income (loss) from operations

 

1,871

 

3,643

 

(582

)

8,478

 

Interest income

 

357

 

507

 

1,055

 

1,802

 

Income before income taxes

 

2,228

 

4,150

 

473

 

10,280

 

Income tax provision

 

1,169

 

1,634

 

527

 

4,051

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

1,059

 

$

2,516

 

$

(54

)

$

6,229

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.05

 

$

0.12

 

$

0.00

 

$

0.30

 

Diluted

 

$

0.05

 

$

0.11

 

$

0.00

 

$

0.28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares used in computing net income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

21,560

 

21,169

 

21,471

 

21,054

 

Diluted

 

22,315

 

22,080

 

21,471

 

22,038

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

4



Table of Contents

 

TECHWELL, INC.

CONDENSED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(54

)

$

6,229

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

538

 

526

 

Stock-based compensation

 

5,429

 

5,433

 

Tax benefit from employee equity incentive plan

 

78

 

211

 

Realized gain on investments

 

 

(18

)

Put option loss

 

316

 

 

Gain from trading securities

 

(316

)

 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

1,008

 

(268

)

Inventory

 

(1,926

)

(1,261

)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

(772

)

(310

)

Other assets

 

749

 

(72

)

Deferred income tax assets

 

189

 

25

 

Accounts payable

 

2,187

 

360

 

Accrued liabilities

 

1,854

 

(135

)

Deferred rent

 

(41

)

(32

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

9,239

 

10,688

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of property and equipment

 

(255

)

(413

)

Purchase of investments

 

(56,619

)

(46,357

)

Proceeds from maturities of investments

 

19,919

 

54,149

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

(36,955

)

7,379

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

 

95

 

354

 

Repurchases of common stock upon release of stock awards

 

(837

)

(923

)

Net cash used in financing activities

 

(742

)

(569

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

(28,458

)

17,498

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

44,485

 

27,177

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

16,027

 

$

44,675

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activity:

 

 

 

 

 

Gross issuance of restricted stock awards

 

$

3,933

 

$

3,773

 

Accrued equipment purchase costs

 

56

 

$

19

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

5



Table of Contents

 

TECHWELL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 1—The Company and Basis of Presentation

 

The Company

 

Techwell, Inc. (“Techwell” or the “Company”) was incorporated in California in 1997 and reincorporated in Delaware in 2006. The Company is a fabless semiconductor company that designs, markets and sells mixed signal integrated circuits for two primary markets: security surveillance and automotive infotainment.

 

The Company’s headquarters is located in San Jose, California.  The Company’s international offices include branch offices in South Korea and Taiwan and subsidiaries in China and Japan. These offices provide marketing support to customers. The China and Japan offices are also involved in product development.

 

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date and time the financial statements were issued on November 6, 2009.

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared without audit in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year then ended. Certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted in accordance with these rules and regulations. The information in this report should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to summarize fairly the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2009 or for any other future period.

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company reports its financial results on a calendar fiscal year.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

 

Certain Significant Risks and Uncertainties

 

The Company operates in a dynamic high technology industry and changes in any of the following areas could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position and results of operations: unpredictable volume and timing of customer orders, which are not fixed by contract; loss of one or more of its customers; decrease in the overall average selling prices of its products; changes in the relative sales mix of its products; changes in its cost of finished goods; the quality and timely service of third-party vendors that manufacture, assemble and test the Company’s products; the Company’s customers’ sales outlook, purchasing patterns and inventory adjustments based on demand and general economic conditions; product obsolescence and the Company’s ability to manage product transitions; the Company’s ability to successfully develop, introduce and sell new or enhanced products in a timely manner; and the timing of new product announcements or introductions by the Company or by its competitors.

 

6



Table of Contents

 

TECHWELL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments. The change in unrealized gains on investments for the three and nine months ended September, 2009 was an increase of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. The change in unrealized losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 was an increase of $0.4 million and $0.8 million, respectively. Total comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $1.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively. Total comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $2.1 million and $5.4 million, respectively.

 

Note 2—Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company has equity incentive plans under which it may grant stock options, restricted stock awards, stock units and stock appreciation rights to employees, consultants and directors. Currently, the Company is granting stock options, restricted stock awards, stock units and stock appreciation rights under its 2006 stock incentive plan (“Plan”) which was adopted by the Board of Directors in November 2005. At September 30, 2009, the total number of shares available for issuance under the Plan was 2.4 million.  Stock options and awards granted under the Plans have a contractual term of up to ten years, generally vest over four years at the rate of 25 percent on the one-year anniversary of the vesting commencement date and ratably each month thereafter and are exercisable under conditions determined by the Board of Directors or committee thereof as permissible under the terms of the Plan. At September 30, 2009, 834 shares exercised prior to vesting are subject to repurchase by the Company.

 

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, stock-based compensation expense includes compensation cost related to estimated fair values of stock options and awards granted after January 1, 2006 and stock-based compensation costs based on intrinsic value related to unvested stock options at January 1, 2006.

 

The following table summarizes the distribution of stock-based compensation expense (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2009

 

2008

 

Cost of revenues

 

$

122

 

$

122

 

$

361

 

$

366

 

Research and development

 

881

 

901

 

2,626

 

2,453

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

816

 

825

 

2,442

 

2,614

 

Related tax-effect

 

(888

)

(616

)

(1,673

)

(1,957

)

Total costs and expenses

 

$

931

 

$

1,232

 

$

3,756

 

$

3,476

 

 

Total compensation cost attributable to activities capitalized into inventory was not significant in any period presented.

 

7



Table of Contents

 

TECHWELL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

Note 3—Net Income (Loss) Per Share

 

Basic net income (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period excluding shares subject to repurchase. Diluted net income (loss) per common share reflects the effects of potentially dilutive securities, which consist of common stock options (calculated using the treasury stock method) and restricted awards and shares subject to repurchase. A reconciliation of shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2009

 

2008

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

21,563

 

21,181

 

21,476

 

21,071

 

Weighted average shares subject to repurchase

 

(3

)

(12

)

(5

)

(17

)

Shares used to calculate basic net income (loss) per share

 

21,560

 

21,169

 

21,471

 

21,054

 

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock options and restricted awards and unvested common shares subject to repurchase or cancellations

 

755

 

911

 

 

984

 

Shares used to calculate diluted net income (loss) per share

 

22,315

 

22,080

 

21,471

 

22,038

 

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, 1.7 million and 1.5 million shares, respectively, associated with stock options and restricted awards outstanding and unvested shares subject to repurchase have been excluded from the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the diluted net income per share computation as they are anti-dilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, 3.0 million and 1.2 million shares, respectively, associated with stock options and restricted awards outstanding and unvested shares subject to repurchase have been excluded from the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the diluted net income (loss) per share computation as they are anti-dilutive.

 

Note 4—Income Taxes

 

In accounting for income taxes, the Company is required to estimate its current tax expense together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatments of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Significant management judgment is required to assess the likelihood that its deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. As of September 30, 2009, the Company’s total deferred tax assets were principally comprised of research and other credit carryforwards, stock-based compensation and expense accruals.

 

The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various states and foreign jurisdictions.  The Company is currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service for the tax years 2007 and 2008. The outcome of the examination is not known, and therefore, the Company is unable to estimate the effect of the audit to the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

The Company’s effective tax rate is based on the estimated annual effective tax rate. The effective tax rate was 52% and 39% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The effective tax rate was 112% and 39% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For the nine months ended September 2009, the Company had a significant discrete tax expense related to stock-based compensation of approximately $0.5 million that impacted the Company’s effective tax rate. In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 the effective tax rate differed from the statutory federal income tax rate primarily due to stock-based compensation, research and development credits and state income taxes.

 

Note 5—Financial Instruments

 

The Company’s investments consist of corporate bonds, US government agency securities, commercial paper and auction rate securities (“ARS”). Investments, with the exception of ARS which are currently classified as trading, are considered available-for-sale. With the exception of ARS, they are all carried at fair market value based on market quotes. The Company’s investment in ARS was intended to provide liquidity via an auction process that resets the applicable interest rate at predetermined calendar intervals, allowing investors to either roll over their holdings or gain immediate liquidity by selling such interests at par. During 2008, uncertainties in the credit markets affected all of the Company’s holdings in ARS investments and auctions for the Company’s investments in these securities failed to settle on their respective settlement dates. Consequently, the investments are not currently liquid and the Company will not be able to access these funds until a future auction of these investments is successful or a buyer is found outside of the auction process. All of the ARS investments were investment grade quality and were in compliance with the Company’s investment policy at the time of acquisition.

 

8



Table of Contents

 

TECHWELL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with one of its investment providers, which currently holds its ARS and from whom it had purchased the ARS, to sell, at the Company’s discretion, at par value all of the ARS the Company currently holds back to the investment provider at anytime starting in June 2010. The rights granted under the agreement represent a firm agreement, which is as an agreement with an unrelated party, binding on both parties and legally enforceable, with the following characteristics: a) the agreement specifies all significant terms, including the quantity to be exchanged, the fixed price and the time of transaction and b) the agreement includes a disincentive for nonperformance that is sufficiently large to make performance probable. The enforceability of the agreement results in a put option and should be recognized as a free standing asset separate from the ARS. The put option does not meet the definition of a derivative instrument. Therefore, the Company has elected to measure the put option at fair value, based on authoritative guidance which permits an entity to elect the fair value option for recognized financial assets. As a result, realized gains and losses will be included in earnings in the period in which they arise.

 

In connection with the acceptance of the offer, the Company recorded $1.0 million as the fair value of the put option asset with a corresponding gain to interest income. Additionally, the Company transferred its ARS from investments classified as available-for-sale to trading. The transfer to trading reflects the Company’s intent to exercise the put option, whereas, prior to the agreement, the Company’s intent was to hold the ARS until the market recovered. Upon transfer to trading, the Company recognized a loss of $1.0 million, included in interest income, for the amount of unrealized loss not previously recognized in earnings. As a result of this transfer unrealized gains or losses will be included in earnings in future periods, and the Company anticipates future changes in fair value of the put option will approximate the fair value movement of the related ARS. The net impact of the change in fair value of the ARS and related put option to the Company’s operating results was nil for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.

 

As of September 30, 2009, the entire ARS investment balance of $6.3 million is classified as short-term investments on the condensed unaudited consolidated balance sheet because the sale of the ARS back to the investment provider is expected to occur in June 2010.

 

Typically the fair value of ARS investments approximates par value due to the frequent resets through the auction process. While the Company continues to earn interest on its ARS investments at the maximum contractual rate, these investments are not currently trading and therefore do not currently have a readily determinable market value. Accordingly, the estimated fair value of ARS no longer approximates par value.

 

The Company has used a discounted cash flow model to determine the estimated fair value of its investment in ARS as of September 30, 2009. The assumptions used in preparing the discounted cash flow model include estimates for interest rates, estimates for discount rates using yields of comparable traded instruments adjusted for illiquidity and other risk factors, amount of cash flows and expected holding periods of the ARS. These inputs reflect the Company’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the ARS, including assumptions about risk, developed based on the best information available in the circumstances.

 

The put option is a free standing asset separate from the ARS, and represents the Company’s contractual right to require its investment provider to purchase the ARS at par at anytime starting in June 2010. The Company values the put option based on amount of cash flows and expected holding periods of the related ARS, time value of money and the Company’s assessment of the credit worthiness of its investment provider.

 

9



Table of Contents

 

TECHWELL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

The following is a summary of the Company’s available-for-sale securities as of September 30, 2009 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less than
12 Months

 

12 Months
or Longer

 

 

 

 

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Unrealized
Gains

 

Unrealized
Losses

 

Unrealized
Losses

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds

 

$

 9,555

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 9,555

 

Corporate bonds

 

34,342

 

276

 

(9

)

 

34,609

 

Municipal bonds

 

1,500

 

7

 

 

 

1,507

 

Treasuries and federal agencies

 

28,631

 

91

 

(2

)

 

28,720

 

Commercial paper

 

2,991

 

 

 

 

2,991

 

Total

 

$

 77,019

 

$

 374

 

$

 (11

)

$

 —

 

$

 77,382

 

 

The following is a summary of the Company’s available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2008 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less than
12 Months

 

12 Months
or Longer

 

 

 

 

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Unrealized
Gains

 

Unrealized
Losses

 

Unrealized
Losses

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds

 

$

 33,998

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

 

$

 33,998

 

Corporate bonds

 

19,710

 

97

 

(57

)

 

19,750

 

Treasuries and federal agencies

 

5,023

 

103

 

 

 

5,126

 

Commercial paper

 

12,061

 

26

 

 

 

12,087

 

Total

 

$

 70,792

 

$

 226

 

$

 (57

)

$

 —

 

$

 70,961

 

 

As of September 30, 2009, the unrealized losses on our available-for-sale securities were insignificant in relation to our total available-for-sale securities. Substantially all of our unrealized losses on our available-for-sale investments can be attributed to fair value fluctuations in an unstable credit environment. The Company considers the declines in market value of its available-for-sale securities to be temporary in nature. When evaluating the investments for other-than-temporary impairment, the Company reviews factors such as the length of time and extent to which fair value has been below cost basis, the financial condition of the issuer and any changes thereto, and the Company’s intent to sell, or whether it is more likely than not it will be required to sell, the investment before recovery of the investment’s amortized cost basis. The Company believes that the unrealized losses are temporary and do not require an other-than-temporary impairment. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company did not recognize any other-than-temporary impairment charges on outstanding available-for-sale securities.

 

10



Table of Contents

 

TECHWELL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements and the fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities. The table below represents the fair value hierarchy of the Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value as of September 30, 2009 (in thousands):

 

 

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Money market funds

 

$

 9,555

 

$

 9,555

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Corporate bonds

 

34,609

 

34,609

 

 

 

Municipal bonds

 

1,507

 

1,507

 

 

 

 

 

Treasuries and federal agencies

 

28,720

 

28,720

 

 

 

Commercial paper

 

2,991

 

2,991

 

 

 

Put option

 

785

 

 

 

785

 

Auction rate securities

 

6,315

 

 

 

6,315

 

Total

 

$

 84,482

 

$

 77,382

 

$

 —

 

$

 7,100

 

Amount included in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

 9,555

 

$

 9,555

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Short-term investments

 

48,089

 

41,774

 

 

6,315

 

Long-term investments

 

26,053

 

26,053

 

 

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

785

 

 

 

785

 

Total

 

$

 84,482

 

$

 77,382

 

$

 —

 

$

 7,100

 

 

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the assets measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) (in thousands):

 

 

 

Put Option

 

Auction Rate
Securities

 

Balances as of December 31, 2008

 

$

 1,101

 

$

 5,999

 

Unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings

 

(304

)

304

 

Balances as of March 31, 2009

 

797

 

6,303

 

Unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings

 

(46

)

46

 

Balances as of June 30, 2009

 

751

 

6,349

 

Unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings

 

34

 

(34

)

Balances as of September 30, 2009

 

$

 785

 

$

 6,315

 

 

Note 6—Details of Certain Balance Sheet Components

 

 

 

September 30,
2009

 

December 31,
2008

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Inventory:

 

 

 

 

 

Finished goods

 

$

 4,501

 

$

 2,750

 

Work-in-process

 

2,205

 

2,030

 

 

 

$

 6,706

 

$

 4,780

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net:

 

 

 

 

 

Equipment

 

$

 2,034

 

$

 1,888

 

Software

 

820

 

779

 

Furniture and fixtures

 

320

 

308

 

Leasehold improvements

 

414

 

454

 

 

 

3,588

 

3,429

 

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

(2,525

)

(2,139

)

 

 

$

 1,063

 

$

 1,290

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued compensation

 

$

 1,150

 

$

 1,168

 

Accrued inventory purchases

 

100

 

104

 

Customer advance

 

1,624

 

 

Legal and professional service fees

 

170

 

320

 

Other

 

941

 

525

 

 

 

$

 3,985

 

$

 2,117

 

 

11



Table of Contents

 

TECHWELL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

Note 7—Segment Information

 

The Company currently operates in one reportable segment, the designing, marketing and selling of mixed signal integrated circuits for multiple video applications primarily for the security surveillance and automotive infotainment markets. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is the Chief Executive Officer.

 

The percentage of total revenues by geographic location is as follows:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2009

 

2008

 

China

 

53

%

41

%

51

%

35

%

South Korea

 

20

 

25

 

22

 

28

 

Taiwan

 

20

 

29

 

18

 

31

 

Japan

 

5

 

3

 

6

 

4

 

United States

 

1

 

1

 

1

 

1

 

Other

 

1

 

1

 

2

 

1

 

Total revenues

 

100

%

100

%

100

%

100

%

 

Revenues by product line are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2009

 

2008

 

Security surveillance

 

$

13,287

 

$

14,409

 

$

29,129

 

$

38,873

 

Automotive infotainment

 

3,172

 

1,995

 

7,204

 

5,655

 

Consumer

 

1,543

 

2,100

 

4,034

 

6,356

 

Other (1)

 

13

 

16

 

25

 

249

 

Total revenues

 

$

18,015

 

$

18,520

 

$

40,392

 

$

51,133

 

 


(1) Consists of contract development projects, early generation mixed signal semiconductors for digital video applications and PCI video decoder products.

 

The revenues and accounts receivable from customers representing 10% or more of total revenues and accounts receivable are as follows:

 

 

 

Accounts Receivable at

 

Revenues

 

 

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

Three Months ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months ended
September 30,

 

Customer

 

2009

 

2008

 

2009

 

2008

 

2009

 

2008

 

A

 

*

%

21

%

38

%

37

%

37

%

32

%

B

 

*

 

11

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

C

 

14

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

D

 

11

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

E

 

*

 

20

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

F

 

18

 

*

 

*

 

11

 

*

 

11

 

G

 

13

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

 


* less than 10%

 

12



Table of Contents

 

TECHWELL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

The following is a summary of long-lived assets by geographic region (in thousands):

 

 

 

September 30,
2009

 

December 31,
2008

 

United States

 

$

873

 

$

1,069

 

China

 

63

 

73

 

Taiwan

 

56

 

79

 

Japan

 

36

 

60

 

South Korea

 

35

 

9

 

Total

 

$

1,063

 

$

1,290

 

 

Note 8—Related Party Transactions

 

One of the Company’s Board members is a partner in a law firm that provides services to the Company. The Company incurred fees of nil and $8,000 from this law firm for legal services in the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company incurred fees of $7,000 and $21,000 from this law firm for legal services in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The amount payable to this law firm was nil and $8,000 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

 

Note 9—Contingencies

 

Indemnification Obligations

 

Subject to certain limitations, the Company is obligated to indemnify its current and former directors, officers and employees in connection with government inquiries and litigation.  These obligations arise under the terms of the Company’s certificate of incorporation, its bylaws, applicable contracts, and Delaware and California law.  The obligation to indemnify generally means that the Company is required to pay or reimburse the individuals’ reasonable legal expenses and possibly damages and other liabilities incurred in connection with these matters.  Additionally, the Company has certain indemnification obligations to customers under its contract development projects with respect to any infringement of third-party patents and intellectual property rights by its products.

 

Other Legal Matters

 

The Company is currently not a party to any material legal proceedings. The Company may be named from time to time as a party to lawsuits in the normal course of its business. Litigation in general and intellectual property and securities litigation in particular, can be expensive and disruptive to normal business operations.  Moreover, the results of legal proceedings are difficult to predict.

 

Note 10—Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued authoritative guidance for fair value measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about assets and liabilities measured at fair value in the financial statements. In February 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance, which allows for the delay of the effective date of the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements for one year for all non-financial assets and liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. The Company adopted the provisions of the guidance for financial assets and liabilities effective January 1, 2008 and the provisions of the guidance for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities effective January 1, 2009. The application of the guidance to non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities did not have an impact on the condensed unaudited consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

In December 2007, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for business combinations, which establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its consolidated financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, contractual contingencies and contingent consideration at their fair value on the acquisition date, any controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. The guidance also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business combination. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company will apply the provisions of the guidance to any acquisitions occurring subsequent to January 1, 2009.

 

13



Table of Contents

 

TECHWELL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on accounting for assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies, which amends the guidance for the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosures for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations. The guidance eliminates the distinction between contractual and non-contractual contingencies, including the initial recognition and measurement criteria. The guidance is effective for contingent assets and contingent liabilities acquired in business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company will assess the impact of this guidance at the time of any such acquisition.

 

In April 2009, the FASB issued three related authoritative guidance for determining fair value when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased and identifying transactions that are not orderly, recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments and interim disclosures about fair value of financial instruments, which are effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. These authoritative guidance provides guidance on how to determine the fair value of assets and liabilities in the current economic environment and reemphasizes that the objective of a fair value measurement remains an exit price, modifies the requirements for recognizing other-than-temporarily impaired debt securities and revises the existing impairment model for such securities, by modifying the current intent and ability indicator in determining whether an investment in debt security is other-than-temporarily impaired, and enhances the disclosure of instruments for both interim and annual periods. Effective April 1, 2009, the Company adopted the provisions of the guidance. The adoption of the three guidance did not have an impact on the condensed unaudited consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Note 11—Subsequent Events

 

On October 9, 2009, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of a development stage company based in China. The purchase price for the acquisition was $4.2 million, less assumed liabilities of approximately $0.8 million.. The Company paid the purchase price in cash and agreed to make restricted stock awards, which will vest over four years, to employees in connection with their new employment with the Company. The acquired company is focused on developing video solutions for the security surveillance market. As part of the purchase agreement, the Company extended employment offers to approximately 40 employees.

 

14



Table of Contents

 

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes to those statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements relate to future periods, future events or our future operating or financial plans or performance. These statements can often be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “expects,” “believes,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “plans,” “may,” or “will,” or the negative of these terms, and other similar expressions. These forward-looking statements include statements as to the source of our revenues, our ability to generate revenues, our ability to sustain our growth rate and return to profitability, expected growth in our target markets and application-specific products, our expectation regarding the increase in certain expenses, our cash needs, our capital requirements, our market risk sensitivity, our business and product strategies, our anticipated tax rate, industry trends and our anticipation that developments in our technologies and new products will increase our target market share.

 

These forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events, are based on assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected and include, but are not limited to, fluctuations in our revenue and operating results, our ability to return to profitability, the demand for our products in our target markets, our ability to compete, our dependence on key and highly skilled personnel, the ability to develop new products and to enhance our existing products, the continued seasonality of our business due to our target markets and location of our customers, our ability to integrate businesses that we may acquire, our ability to estimate and predict customer demand, economic volatility in either domestic or foreign markets, the impact of any change in United States federal income tax laws and the loss of any beneficial tax treatment that we currently enjoy, our reliance on independent foundries and subcontractors for the manufacture, assembly and testing of our products, the length of our sales cycle and reliance on distributors, our ability to protect our intellectual property, the cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry, our ability to raise capital, the potential volatility of our stock, the outcome of future litigation and the other risks set forth under PART II — OTHER INFORMATION,  Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” Given these risks and uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Except as required by federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future.

 

In this report all references to “Techwell,” “we,” “us” or “our” mean Techwell, Inc.

 

Techwell is our registered trademark. We also refer to trademarks of other corporations and organizations in this Form 10-Q.

 

Overview

 

We are a fabless semiconductor company that designs, markets and sells mixed signal integrated circuits for two primary markets: security surveillance and automotive infotainment. We design application-specific products for our two primary markets that enable the conversion of analog video signals to digital form and perform advanced digital video processing to facilitate the display, storage and transport of video content. We believe this application specific product strategy allows us to better address varying customer requirements, fully leverage our technology capabilities and achieve greater share within our two core markets. To a lesser extent, we market and sell video decoders to the consumer market. Our semiconductors are based on our proprietary architecture and mixed signal technologies that we believe provide high video quality under a wide range of signal conditions, enable high levels of integration and are cost-effective.

 

Our business has experienced significant growth primarily as a result of our ability to develop new products, obtain design wins and convert these design wins into revenues. We generated revenues from the sale of over 25 different products in the quarter ended September 30, 2009.

 

15



Table of Contents

 

We have three principal semiconductor product lines: security surveillance products, automotive infotainment products and consumer products. Our security surveillance products integrate important functions required to display, store and transport analog video signals from security surveillance cameras. For example, we integrate multiple video decoders into a single semiconductor. As a result, this semiconductor is able to receive and decode analog video signals from multiple cameras into a standard digital format. In addition, we integrate a multiplexor, a key technology required to combine multiple video signals into a single video signal, and a display processor, a key technology required to display multiple video channels. In 2007, we introduced our first integrated security surveillance product, which integrated four video decoders and a system controller and a multiplexor on a single semiconductor. In December 2008, we introduced a new security surveillance product which includes a 16 channel multiplexer and supports the display of multiple standard definition and high definition video sources. We currently sell our security surveillance products to customers for the following applications: embedded digital video recorders, or DVRs, PC-based DVRs, networked video recorders, or NVRs, and multiplexors.

 

Our automotive infotainment products integrate important functions required to display popular analog video, high definition video and PC graphics signals on a LCD display. These key functions include a video decoder, deinterlacer and scaler. In addition, our newer generation automotive infotainment products integrate a timing controller to interface directly with certain types of LCD displays and image enhancement functionality to improve overall video quality. In January 2008, we announced the introduction of five new LCD display processors designed for the automotive end market. These new products are designed to provide advanced image processing, an integrated programmable timing controller and multiple analog and digital video inputs.

 

Our consumer products are high performance mixed signal semiconductors that decode analog TV broadcast signals, including NTSC, PAL and SECAM, and popular analog video signals, including composite, S-Video, component and SCART, into a standard digital format. Our consumer products integrate proprietary sync processing, color demodulating and digital 2D and 3D comb filtering, which are the key technologies required for high performance video decoding. We offer a broad range of consumer products at various price points and with varying features. We have developed our video decoder products for applications within the consumer markets such as advanced TV, multifunction LCD monitor, DVD recorder and camcorders. In the future, however, we intend to focus our development efforts specifically on applications for the security surveillance and automotive infotainment markets and as a result, we anticipate our consumer revenues will decline over the next several quarters.

 

Our other products include early generation mixed signal semiconductors for digital video applications and PCI video decoder products, which are video decoders that utilize peripheral component interconnect, or PCI, technology for personal computer applications.

 

Although our revenues have grown rapidly since 2004, we do not expect to achieve similar growth rates in the future. We currently expect to increase our expense levels in the future to support increased research and development efforts in order to bring new products to our primary markets. These expenditures may not result in increased revenue or profitability in the future. In addition, our ability to increase our revenues will depend on increased demand for digital video applications in the security surveillance and automotive infotainment markets. Although we believe our two primary markets will experience growth in the next few years, actual growth of these markets is uncertain. In addition, the timing of orders by and shipments to our customers, as well as general trends in our two primary markets, can cause our revenue growth to be inconsistent.

 

We undertake significant product development efforts well in advance of a product’s release, and in advance of receiving purchase orders from our customers. Our product development efforts, which are focused on developing new designs with broad demand and potential for future derivative products, typically take from six to 24 months until production begins, depending on the product’s complexity. If we secure a design win, the system designer is likely to continue to use the same or enhanced versions of our product across a number of their models, which tends to extend the life cycles of our products. Conversely, if a competitor secures the design win, it may be difficult for us to sell into the customer’s application for an extended period. Our sales cycle typically ranges from six to 24 months. Due to the length of our product development and sales cycle, the majority of our revenues for any period is generally weighted toward products introduced for sale, meaning products for which we commenced placing orders with our manufacturing subcontractors, in the prior one or two years. As a result, our present revenues are not necessarily representative of future sales because our future sales are likely to be comprised of a different mix of products, some of which are now in the development stage.

 

16



Table of Contents

 

As a fabless semiconductor company, we outsource all of our manufacturing, assembly and test functions to third-party vendors primarily located in Taiwan. This business model enables us to reduce our capital expenditures and fixed costs, while focusing our engineering and design resources on our core strength, the design of mixed signal semiconductors for digital video applications.

 

We sell our products to distributors that fulfill third-party orders for our products. We also sell directly, using independent sales representatives, to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, and to original design manufacturers, or ODMs. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we derived 76% of our revenues from products sold to distributors and 24% from products sold to OEMs or ODMs. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we derived 79% of our revenues from products sold to distributors and 21% from products sold to OEMs or ODMs.  Our gross margins have not historically been significantly different between sales to distributors and sales to OEMs or ODMs through orders procured by independent sales representatives. However, our operating profit on sales through orders procured by independent sales representatives can be less due to the payment of commissions to sales representatives which we record as sales and marketing expense.

 

We received an aggregate of 75% and 80% of our revenues from our ten largest customers for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, Lacewood International Corporation, or Lacewood, a distributor, accounted for 38% of our revenues. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, Lacewood and AV Tech Corporation, or AV Tech, accounted for 37% and 11% of our revenues, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, Lacewood accounted for 37% of our revenues. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, Lacewood and AV Tech accounted for 32% and 11% of our revenues, respectively.

 

We derive substantially all of our revenues from sales to foreign customers, particularly in Asia, which sales accounted for 97% and 98% of our revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The table below indicates the percentage of total revenues by geographic location for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2009

 

2008

 

China

 

53

%

41

%

51

%

35

%

South Korea

 

20

 

25

 

22

 

28

 

Taiwan

 

20

 

29

 

18

 

31

 

Japan

 

5

 

3

 

6

 

4

 

United States

 

1

 

1

 

1

 

1

 

Other

 

1

 

1

 

2

 

1

 

Total revenues

 

100

%

100

%

100

%

100

%

 

We received 51% and 35% of our revenues from China in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.  The percentage increase between 2009 and 2008 was primarily due to an increase in revenue from our security surveillance customers in China who are benefitting from the relative strength in the Chinese domestic economy. We received 18% and 31% of our revenues from Taiwan in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.  The decrease was primarily due to a decline in revenues from consumer markets, whose products were primarily sold to customers in Taiwan.

 

We believe that a substantial majority of our revenues will continue to come from customers located in Asia, where most of the electronic devices that use our semiconductors are manufactured. As a result of this regional customer concentration, we may be subject to environmental, economic, cultural and political events as well as other developments that impact our customers in Asia. All of our sales currently are denominated in U.S. dollars. Therefore, an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies could make our products less competitive in international markets. Substantially all of our cost of revenues and a majority of our operating expenses are also denominated in U.S. dollars. As a result, we believe that our overall exposure to foreign exchange risk is low.

 

17



Table of Contents

 

At September 30, 2009, we had two international subsidiaries, one in Japan and one in China. We also have two international branches, one in South Korea and one in Taiwan. At September 30, 2009, 64 of our 165 employees were located in our international subsidiaries and branch offices. Our China and Japan subsidiaries are involved in both product development and technical marketing support. Our Taiwan and Korea branches primarily provide technical marketing support.

 

It is difficult for us to forecast the demand for our products, in part because of the highly complex supply chain between us and the end markets that incorporate our products. Demand for new features changes rapidly. Distributors and ODMs add an additional layer of complexity. We must, therefore, forecast demand not only from our direct customers, but also from other participants in this multi-level distribution channel. Because of our lengthy product development cycle, it is critical for us to anticipate changes in demand for our various product features and the applications they serve, to allow sufficient time for product design. Our failure to accurately forecast demand can lead to product shortages that can impede production by our customers and harm our relationship with these customers. Conversely, our failure to forecast declining demand or shifts in product mix can result in excess or obsolete inventory.

 

Generally, the average selling price of our products will decline over the life of the product. Our experience to date is that the decline has not had a material effect on our gross margins, as price reductions have been mitigated by lower per unit costs associated with both high unit volume and the transition of our products to smaller process geometries.

 

We expect our revenues to be lower in the first calendar quarter of each year. The most significant factor for this decline is because most of our semiconductors are sold to customers located in Asia, primarily to customers located in regions who observe the Lunar New Year holiday. Typically, our customers’ offices are closed for a week or more during the extended holiday period, which negatively impacts our business during the first calendar quarter of the year. As a result of seasonality associated with our customer concentration in Asia, we expect our revenues to be lower in the first calendar quarter of each year.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates on an on-going basis, including those related to inventory valuations, valuation of investments, income taxes and stock-based compensation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making the judgments we make about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Because these estimates can vary depending on the situation, actual results may differ from the estimates.

 

We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments used in the preparation of our condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

Revenue Recognition.   Revenues from product sales are recognized upon shipment, provided that title and risk of loss has passed to the customer, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is probable. We do not allow for price protection or stock rotation rights with any of our distributors. If we change our practice and allow stock rotation or price protection in the future, we would have to evaluate the consequences on the timing of our revenue recognition, which could lead to the deferral of the revenues subject to such uncertainties unless reasonable estimates of returns or price reductions can be made at the time of shipment.

 

18



Table of Contents

 

Fair Value Measurements.  Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements and the fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities. The guidance defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements required under other accounting guidance.  The guidance clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants and also requires that a fair value measurement reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on the best information available. Assumptions include the risks inherent in a particular valuation technique (such as a pricing model) and/or the risks inherent in the inputs to the model. These assumptions are volatile and subject to change as the underlying sources of these assumptions and market conditions change.  Refer to Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for the fair value hierarchy, and Note 5 to our condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for inputs to valuation techniques and fair value measurements of financial assets carried at fair value.

 

Inventory Valuation.   Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market, computed on a first-in, first-out basis. We evaluate inventory for excess and obsolescence and write-down units that are unlikely to be sold based upon a six month demand forecast. This evaluation may take into account matters including expected demand, anticipated sales price, product obsolescence and other factors. If actual future demand for our products is less than currently forecasted, additional inventory write-downs may be required. Once inventory costs are written down, such revised costs are maintained until the product is sold or scrapped. If a unit that has been written down is subsequently sold, the cost associated with the revenue from this unit is reduced to the extent of the write-down, resulting in an increase in gross profit.

 

Accounting for Income Taxes.   In accounting for income taxes, we are required to estimate our current tax expense together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatments of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities. We must assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. Significant management judgment is required to assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. At September 30, 2009, our total deferred tax assets were principally comprised of research and other credit carryforwards, stock-based compensation and expense accruals.

 

We assess the recoverability of our deferred tax assets. To assess the likelihood that the deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income, we considered both positive evidence that indicates a valuation allowance is not needed and negative evidence that indicates a valuation allowance is needed. As of September 30, 2009, we believe that our predictable strong earnings provide ample evidence that no valuation allowance is required at this time as it is more likely than not the deferred tax assets will be realized in the future.

 

Management believes it is more likely than not that forecasted income, including income that may be generated as a result of certain tax planning strategies, together with the tax effects of the deferred tax liabilities, will be sufficient to fully recover the remaining deferred tax assets. In the event that we determine all or part of the net deferred tax assets are not realizable in the future, we will make an adjustment to the valuation allowance that would be charged to earnings in the period such determination is made. In addition, the calculation of tax liabilities involves significant judgment in estimating the impact of uncertainties. Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner inconsistent with management’s expectations could have a material impact on our financial condition and operating results.

 

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various states and foreign jurisdictions. We are currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service for the tax years 2007 and 2008. The outcome of the examination is not known, and therefore, we are unable to estimate the effect of the audit to our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Stock-Based Compensation.   For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, stock-based compensation expense includes compensation costs related to estimated fair values of stock options and awards granted after January 1, 2006 and compensation costs related to unvested stock options at January 1, 2006 based on the intrinsic values.

 

19



Table of Contents

 

For options granted after January 1, 2006, we use the straight-line method for expense attribution. For options granted prior to January 1, 2006, we use the multiple grant approach for expense attribution, which results in substantially higher amounts of amortization in earlier years as opposed to the straight-line method, which results in equal amortization over the vesting period of the options.

 

The fair value of options granted after January 1, 2006 is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The expected term assumption calculation was based on historical data as adjusted for any changes in future expectations. We relied exclusively on historical volatility in the expected volatility assumption calculation since we do not have any publicly traded options. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods corresponding with the expected term of the option and the estimated forfeiture rate is based on our historical forfeiture experience.

 

The following assumptions are used to value stock options granted in the periods presented:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2009

 

2008

 

Expected term (years)

 

4.34

 

4.28

 

4.34

 

4.28

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

2.01

%

2.79

%

1.52 – 2.01

%

2.57 – 2.86

%

Expected volatility

 

53.00

%

51.00

%

53.00 – 54.00

%

51.00 – 64.00

%

Expected dividend

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation expense for restricted stock awards is determined using the fair value of our stock on the date of the grant and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period.

 

Stock-based compensation expense is allocated among cost of revenues, research and development expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses, respectively, based upon the employee’s job function. We expect to continue to recognize substantial amounts of stock-based compensation expense relating to our employee stock options and awards in future periods.

 

Results of Operations

 

The following table is derived from our selected financial data and sets forth our historical operating results as a percentage of revenues:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2009

 

2008

 

Revenues

 

100.0

%

100.0

%

100.0

%

100.0

%

Cost of revenues*

 

39.1

 

37.0

 

39.6

 

38.0

 

Gross profit

 

60.9

 

63.0

 

60.4

 

62.0

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development*

 

29.3

 

24.0

 

34.4

 

23.9

 

Selling, general and administrative*

 

21.3

 

19.3

 

27.4

 

21.5

 

Total operating expenses

 

50.6

 

43.3

 

61.8

 

45.4

 

Income (loss) from operations

 

10.3

 

19.7

 

(1.4

)

16.6

 

Interest income

 

2.0

 

2.7

 

2.6

 

3.5

 

Income before income taxes

 

12.3

 

22.4

 

1.2

 

20.1

 

Income tax provision

 

6.4

 

8.8

 

1.3

 

7.9

 

Net income (loss)

 

5.9

%

13.6

%

(0.1

)%

12.2

%

 


* Percentages include stock-based compensation

 

20



Table of Contents

 

The following table indicates the percentage of stock-based compensation attributed to each item as a percentage of revenues:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2009

 

2008

 

Cost of revenues

 

0.7

%

0.7

%

0.9

%

0.7

%

Research and development

 

4.9

 

4.9

 

6.5

 

4.8

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

4.5

 

4.5

 

6.0

 

5.1

 

 

Revenues by product line are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2009

 

2008

 

Security surveillance

 

$

13,287

 

$

14,409

 

$

29,129

 

$

38,873

 

Automotive infotainment

 

3,172

 

1,995

 

7,204

 

5,655

 

Consumer

 

1,543

 

2,100

 

4,034

 

6,356

 

Other (1)

 

13

 

16

 

25

 

249

 

Total revenues

 

$

18,015

 

$

18,520

 

$

40,392

 

$

51,133

 

 


(1) Consists of contract development projects, early generation mixed signal semiconductors for digital video applications and PCI video decoder products.

 

Comparisons of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008

 

Revenues.   Our revenues consist of sales of our mixed signal integrated circuits for digital video applications. We have three principal product lines: security surveillance, automotive infotainment and consumer. All of our sales are denominated in U.S. dollars.

 

Revenues were $18.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and $18.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of 3% due to a general decrease in demand for our security surveillance and consumer products primarily as a result of current economic conditions, partially offset by an increase in demand for our automotive infotainment products.  Revenues from our security surveillance products decreased $1.1 million, or 8%, in the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008. Revenues from of our automotive infotainment products increased $1.2 million, or 59%, in the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008 due primarily to previously awarded design wins with customers increasingly moving into volume production. Revenues from consumer products decreased $0.6 million, or 27%, in the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008.

 

Gross Profit and Gross Margin.  Gross profit is the difference between revenues and cost of revenues, and gross margin represents gross profit as a percentage of revenues. Costs of revenues, also known as costs of goods sold, consists primarily of cost of processed silicon wafers, costs associated with assembly, test and shipping of our production semiconductors, cost of personnel and related expenses associated with supporting our outsourced manufacturing activities and write-downs for excess and obsolete inventory.

 

Gross profit was $11.0 million and $11.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, a decrease of 6%. Gross margin was 61% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 decreasing from 63% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 due to production variances and changes in product mix.

 

We incurred stock-based compensation included in cost of revenues associated with outsourced manufacturing support and quality assurance personnel of $0.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.

 

Research and Development Expenses.  Research and development expenses consist primarily of compensation and associated costs of employees engaged in research and development, contractor costs, tape-out costs, development testing and evaluation costs, occupancy costs and depreciation expense. Before releasing new products, we incur charges for mask sets, prototype wafers and mask set revisions, which we refer to as tape-out costs. Tape-out costs cause our research and development expenses to fluctuate because they are not incurred uniformly every quarter. We expect our research and development costs to increase in absolute dollars in the future as we increase our investment in developing new products and headcount to support our development efforts.

 

21



Table of Contents

 

Research and development expenses were $5.3 million, or 29% of revenues, for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and $4.4 million, or 24% of revenues, for the three months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of 19%. The increase in research and development expenses was primarily attributable to increased tape-out expenses of $0.8 million as a result of our development of new products and our migration to smaller geometry process technologies.

 

We incurred stock-based compensation expense associated with research and development personnel of $0.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.  Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation and associated costs for marketing, selling and administrative personnel, sales commissions to independent sales representatives, public relations, promotional and other marketing expenses, insurance and fees paid for professional services, travel, depreciation expenses and occupancy costs. Costs associated with audit and tax services, corporate governance and compliance and financial reporting are also included in selling, general and administrative expenses. We expect selling, general and administrative expenses to remain relatively constant in absolute dollars throughout the rest of fiscal 2009.

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $3.8 million, or 21% of revenues, for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and $3.6 million, or 19% of revenues, for the three months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of 7%. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily due to increased professional service expenses of $0.5 million, primarily for legal and accounting services, partially offset by a decrease in compensation-related expenses of $0.1 million.

 

We incurred stock-based compensation expense associated with selling, general and administrative personnel of $0.8 million in the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.

 

Interest Income.  Interest income was $0.4 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, a decrease of 30%. The decrease was primarily due to lower rates of returns on our cash equivalents and investments partially offset by higher cash equivalents and investment balances.

 

Provision for Income Taxes.  Our provision for income taxes was $1.2 million and $1.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Our effective tax rate was 52% and 39% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 differed from the statutory federal income tax rate primarily due to stock-based compensation, research and development credits and state income taxes.

 

Comparisons of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008

 

Revenues.   Revenues were $40.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and $51.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of 21% due to a general decrease in demand for our security surveillance and consumer products primarily as a result of current economic conditions, partially offset by an increase in demand for our automotive infotainment products.  Revenues from our security surveillance products decreased $9.7 million, or 25%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Revenues from of our automotive infotainment products increased $1.5 million, or 27%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to previously awarded design wins with customers increasingly moving into volume production. Revenues from consumer products decreased $2.3 million, or 37%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Other revenues decreased by $0.2 million, or 90%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2008.

 

22



Table of Contents

 

Gross Profit and Gross Margin.  Gross profit was $24.4 million and $31.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, a decrease of 23%. Gross margin was 60% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 decreasing from 62% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 due to production variances and changes in product mix.

 

We incurred stock-based compensation included in cost of revenues associated with outsourced manufacturing support and quality assurance personnel of $0.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.

 

Research and Development Expenses.  Research and development expenses were $13.9 million, or 34% of revenues, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and $12.2 million, or 24% of revenues, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of 14%. The increase in research and development expenses was primarily attributable to an increase of $1.0 million of tape-out expenses as a result of our development of new products and our migration to smaller geometry process technologies and increased compensation-related expenses of $0.8 million, reflecting both increases in stock-based compensation and in headcount to support the development of new products and technologies.

 

We incurred stock-based compensation expense associated with research and development personnel of $2.6 million and $2.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.   Selling, general and administrative expenses were $11.1 million, or 27% of revenues, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and $11.0 million, or 22% of revenues, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of 1%.

 

We incurred stock-based compensation expense associated with selling, general and administrative personnel of $2.4 million and $2.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

Interest Income.  Interest income was $1.1 million and $1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, a decrease of 41%. The decrease was primarily due to lower rates of returns on our cash equivalents and investments partially offset by higher cash equivalents and investment balances.

 

Provision for Income Taxes.  Our provision for income taxes was $0.5 million and $4.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Our effective tax rate was 112% and 39% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For the nine months ended September 2009, we had a significant discrete tax expense related to stock-based compensation of approximately $0.5 million that impacted our effective tax rate. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 differed from the statutory federal income tax rate primarily due to stock-based compensation, research and development credits and state income taxes.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources
 

Since our inception, we have financed our growth primarily with proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock and common stock and cash flow generated by our operations. Our cash and cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments were $90.2 million as of September 30, 2009.

 

Net cash from operating activities

 

Net cash provided by operating activities was $9.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The net cash provided by operating activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was primarily due to non-cash charges for stock-based compensation of $5.4 million, an increase in accounts payable of $2.2 million due to timing of purchases, an increase in accrued liabilities of $1.9 million due to increases in customer advances and a decrease in accounts receivable of $1.0 million due to timing of customer collections. These were partially offset by an increase in inventory of $1.9 million due to increased purchases.

 

Net cash provided by operating activities was $10.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The net cash provided by our operating activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily due to our net income of $6.2 million and non-cash charges for stock-based compensation of $5.4 million. These were partially offset by an increase in inventory of $1.3 million attributable to the growth in our revenue during this period.

 

23



Table of Contents

 

Net cash from investing activities

 

Net cash used in investing activities was $37.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 due to the purchases of our investments of $56.6 million partially offset by maturities of our investments of $19.9 million.

 

Net cash provided by our investing activities was $7.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 due to the maturities of our investments of $54.1 million partially offset by purchases of short and long-term investments of $46.4 million and capital expenditures of $0.4 million.

 

Net cash from financing activities

 

Net cash used in financing activities was $0.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 due to repurchases of common stock upon release of restricted stock awards.

 

Net cash used in financing activities was $0.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 due to repurchases of common stock upon release of restricted stock awards partially offset by proceeds from the exercise of stock options.

 

At September 30, 2009, we held $6.3 million of investments with an auction reset feature, which are referred to as auction rate securities, or ARS, whose underlying assets are generally student loans which are substantially backed by the federal government. In February and March of 2008, auctions failed for our ARS, and there is no assurance that successful auctions of any ARS in our investment portfolio will occur in the future. An auction failure means that the parties wishing to sell securities could not. All of our ARS were rated AAA at the time of purchase, and continue to be rated AAA, the highest rating, by a rating agency.

 

During the fourth quarter of 2008, we entered into an agreement with one of our investment providers, which currently holds all of our ARS and from whom we had purchased the ARS, to sell, at our discretion, at par value all of the ARS we currently hold back to the investment provider at anytime starting in June 2010. Our ability to liquidate our ARS investment and fully recover the carrying value of our investment in the near term may be limited or not-existent. We have classified these ARS investments as short-term investments because our sale of the ARS back to the investment provider is expected to occur in June 2010. We are continuing to evaluate the credit quality, classification and valuation of our ARS, but based on our expected operating cash flows, and our other sources of cash, we do not anticipate the potential near term lack of liquidity on these investments will affect our ability to execute our current business plan.

 

We believe our existing cash and cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments, as well as cash expected to be generated from operating activities will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for at least the next 12 months. Our long-term future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our level of revenues, the timing and extent of spending to support our product development efforts, the expansion of sales and marketing activities, the timing of our introductions of new products, the costs to ensure access to adequate manufacturing capacity and the continuing market acceptance of our products. We could be required, or could elect, to seek additional funding through public or private equity or debt financing and additional funds may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

As of September 30, 2009, we have no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation S-K.

 

24



Table of Contents

 

Contractual Obligations

 

The following table identifies our commitments to settle contractual obligations as of September 30, 2009 (in thousands):

 

 

 

Payments Due by Period

 

 

 

Total

 

Less than
1 Year

 

1-3
Years

 

4-5
Years

 

Minimum lease commitments

 

$

1,656

 

$

683

 

$

909

 

$

64

 

Purchase commitments

 

2,880

 

2,880

 

 

 

Total commitments

 

$

4,536

 

$

3,563

 

$

909

 

$

64

 

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

For a description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects, if any, on our condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements, refer to Note 10 to our condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

The primary objectives of our investment activities are to preserve principal, provide liquidity and maximize income without significantly increasing the risk. Some of the securities we invest in are subject to market risk. This means that a change in prevailing interest rates may cause the principal amount of the investment to fluctuate. To minimize this risk, we maintain our portfolio of cash equivalents, short and long-term investments in demand accounts, money market funds, commercial paper, corporate bonds, U.S. government agency securities and ARS which are investment grade securities with a maximum dollar weighted maturity of two years or less. The risk associated with fluctuating interest rates is limited to our investment portfolio, and we believe that a 10% change in interest rates would not have a significant impact on our interest income.

 

At September 30, 2009, we held $6.3 million of investments with an auction reset feature (ARS), whose underlying assets are generally student loans which are substantially backed by the federal government. In February and March of 2008, auctions failed for our ARS. An auction failure means that the parties wishing to sell securities could not. All of our ARS were rated AAA at the time of purchase and are still rated AAA as of September 30, 2009, the highest rating, by a rating agency. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we entered into an agreement with one of our investment providers, which currently holds all of our ARS and from whom we had purchased the ARS, to sell, at our discretion, at par value the ARS we currently hold back to the investment provider at anytime starting in June 2010. We have classified our ARS investment as a short-term investment on the condensed unaudited consolidated balance sheet because the sale of the ARS back to our investment provider is expected to occur in June 2010.  Refer to Note 5 to our condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements for additional discussions regarding our ARS and related put option.

 

To date, our international customer agreements have been denominated solely in U.S. dollars, and accordingly, we have not been exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations from customer agreements, and do not currently engage in foreign currency hedging transactions. However, the functional currency of our foreign operations is the U.S. dollar and our local accounts are maintained in the local currency, and thus we are subject to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations associated with remeasurement to U.S. dollars. Such fluctuations have not been significant historically, and we believe that a 10% change in exchange rates would not have a significant impact on our operating expenses.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and

 

25



Table of Contents

 

forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Our disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to meet the reasonable assurance standards. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under potential future conditions.

 

Based on the evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

 

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

Part II. Other Information

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

 

We are currently not a party to any material legal proceedings. We may from time to time become involved in litigation relating to claims arising from our ordinary course of business. These claims, even if not meritorious, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 

If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, results of operations and financial condition could suffer significantly.

 

Risks Related to Our Business

 

Fluctuations in our revenue and operating results on a quarterly basis could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

 

Our revenue and operating results are difficult to predict, have in the past fluctuated, and may in the future fluctuate from quarter to quarter. It is possible that our operating results in some quarters will be below market expectations. This would likely cause the market price of our common stock to decline. Our quarterly operating results are affected by a number of factors, including:

 

·                     unpredictable volume and timing of customer orders, which are not fixed by contract and vary on a purchase order basis;

·                     uncertain demand in our two primary end markets for our products;

·                     the loss of one or more of our customers, causing a significant reduction or postponement of orders from these customers;

·                     decreases in the overall average selling prices of our products;

·                     changes in the relative sales mix of our products;

·                     changes in our cost of finished goods;

·                     the availability, pricing and timeliness of delivery of other components used in our customers’ products;

·                     our customers’ sales outlook, purchasing patterns and inventory adjustments based on demands and general economic conditions;

·                     product obsolescence and our ability to manage product transitions;

 

26



Table of Contents

 

·                     our ability to successfully develop, introduce and sell new or enhanced products in a timely manner;

·                     the timing of new product announcements or introductions by us or by our competitors; and

·                     fluctuations in our effective tax rate.

 

We base our planned operating expenses in part on our expectations of future revenue, and a significant portion of our expenses is relatively fixed in the short-term. We have limited historical financial data from which to predict future sales for our products. As a result, it is difficult for us to forecast our future revenue and budget our operating expenses accordingly. If revenue for a particular quarter is lower than we expect, we likely will be unable to proportionately reduce our operating expenses for that quarter, which would harm our operating results for that quarter.

 

We incurred a net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and may not return to profitability in the future, which may cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

 

We first became profitable in the second quarter of 2005. We incurred significant net losses prior to that quarter and incurred a net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. To return to profitability, we will need to generate and sustain substantially higher revenue while maintaining reasonable cost and expense levels. We currently expect to increase expense levels in each of the next several quarters to support increased research and development efforts. These expenditures may not result in increased revenue or customer growth. Because many of our expenses are fixed in the short-term, or are incurred in advance of anticipated sales, we may not be able to decrease our expenses in a timely manner to offset any shortfall of sales. We also believe our future effective tax rate will be at or near the current statutory tax rate, which is higher than our average historical annual effective tax rate, which has been less than 10% of our pre-tax income since our inception. This will harm our future financial results and negatively impact our profitability. We may not be able to return to profitability on a quarterly or an annual basis. This may, in turn, cause the price of our common stock to decline.

 

The demand for our products is affected by general economic conditions, which could impact our business.

 

The United States and international economies are currently experiencing a period of economic downturn. The timing of sustained economic recovery, if any, is uncertain. In addition, terrorist acts and similar events, turmoil in the Middle East or war in general, could contribute to a slowdown of the market demand for our products. If the economy continues to slow down as a result of the recent economic, political and social turmoil, or if there are further terrorist attacks in the United States or elsewhere, we may experience decreases in the demand for our products, which may harm our operating results. Our business has been adversely affected by the current economic downturn. Demand for our products has suffered as customers delay purchasing decisions or change or reduce their discretionary spending.

 

Fluctuations in demand for our products may harm our financial results and are difficult to forecast.

 

Current uncertainty in global economic conditions pose a risk to the overall economy as consumers and businesses may delay or postpone purchases in response to tighter credit and negative financial news, which could negatively affect demand for our products. Consequently, demand could be different from our expectations due to many factors including:

 

·                     changes in business and economic conditions, including conditions in the credit market that could affect consumer confidence;

·                     customer acceptance of our products;

·                     changes in customer order patterns including order cancellations; and

·                     changes in the level of inventory at customers.

 

27



Table of Contents

 

If the growth of demand for digital video applications for the security surveillance and automotive infotainment markets does not continue, our ability to increase our revenue could suffer.

 

Our ability to increase our revenue will depend on increased demand for digital video applications in the security surveillance and automotive infotainment markets. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, 74% and 72% of our revenues, respectively, was derived from the sale of our products designed for the security surveillance market. If our products sold into this market decline or do not increase, or if demand slows in this market generally, our operating results would suffer. In addition, we have increased our focus on the automotive infotainment market and devoted substantial resources to the development of products for digital video applications that address this market. If we are not successful in selling our products into this market, or if the automotive infotainment industry in general continues to experience weak demand, we may not recover the costs associated with our efforts in this area and our operating results could suffer.

 

The growth of our target markets is uncertain and will depend in particular upon:

 

·                     the pace at which new digital video applications are adopted;

·                     a continued reduction in the costs of products in these markets;

·                     the availability, at a reasonable price, of components required by such products, such as LCD panels; and

·                     consumer confidence and the continued increase of consumer spending levels.

 

Our success depends on our ability to develop and introduce new products, which we may not be able to do in a timely manner, as product development in smaller wafer fabrication geometries becomes more complex and costly.

 

The development of new products is highly complex, and we have experienced some delays in bringing new products to the market in the past. As our products integrate new, more advanced functions, they become more complex and increasingly difficult to design. In addition, in our effort to decrease cost, we intend to design new products in smaller fabrication geometries, some of which we may have no prior experience of success. In the past, we have experienced some difficulties in shifting to smaller geometry process technologies.

 

Completing these projects is extremely challenging, time-consuming and expensive, and we can give no assurance that we will succeed or succeed in a timely and cost-effective manner. Product development delays may result from unanticipated engineering complexities, changing market or competitive product requirements or specifications, difficulties in overcoming resource limitations, the inability to license third-party technology or other factors. If we are unable to develop products successfully, in a timely and cost-effective manner, our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer.

 

The average selling prices of our semiconductor products may be subject to rapid price declines, which could harm our revenue and gross profits.

 

The semiconductor products we develop and sell may be subject to rapid declines in average selling prices. From time to time, we have had to reduce our prices significantly to meet customer requirements, and we may be required to reduce our prices in the future. This would cause our gross margins to decline which in turn may negatively impact our operating results. Our financial results will suffer if we are unable to offset any reductions in our average selling prices by increasing our sales volumes, reducing our costs or developing new or enhanced products on a timely basis with higher selling prices or gross margins.

 

We face intense competition and may not be able to compete effectively, which could reduce our market share and decrease our revenue and profitability.

 

The markets in which we operate are extremely competitive and are characterized by rapid technological change, continuous evolving customer requirements and declining average selling prices. We may not be able to compete successfully against current or potential competitors. If we do not compete successfully, our market share and revenue may decline. We compete with large semiconductor manufacturers and designers, and our current and

 

28



Table of Contents

 

potential competitors have longer operating histories, significantly greater resources and name recognition and a larger base of customers than we do. This may allow them to respond more quickly than we can to new or emerging technologies or changes in customer requirements. In addition, these competitors may have greater credibility with our existing and potential customers. Many of our current and potential customers have their own internally developed semiconductor solutions and may choose not to purchase products from third-party suppliers like us.

 

We depend on key and highly skilled personnel to operate our business, and if we are unable to retain our current personnel and hire additional personnel, our ability to develop and market our products could be harmed.

 

We believe our future success will depend in large part upon our ability to attract and retain highly skilled managerial, engineering and sales and marketing personnel. The loss of any key employees or the inability to attract or retain qualified personnel could delay the development and introduction of, and harm our ability to sell, our products and harm the market’s perception of us. We believe that our future success is highly dependent on the contributions of Fumihiro Kozato, our president and chief executive officer, and Dr. Feng Kuo, our chief technical officer. We do not have long-term employment contracts with these or any other key personnel, and their knowledge of our business and industry would be extremely difficult to replace.

 

If we fail to develop new products and enhance our existing products in order to react to rapid technological change and market demands, our business will suffer.

 

We must develop new products and enhance our existing products with improved technologies to meet rapidly evolving customer requirements. We need to design products for customers who continually require higher performance and functionality at lower costs. We must, therefore, continue to cost-effectively add features that enhance performance and functionality to our products. The development process for these advancements is lengthy and requires us to accurately anticipate market trends. Our failure to accurately anticipate market trends in a timely manner will harm the market acceptance of our products and the sales of our products.

 

Developing and enhancing these products is uncertain and can be time-consuming, costly and complex. There is a risk that these developments and enhancements will be late, fail to meet customer or market specifications or not be competitive with products from our competitors that offer comparable or superior performance and functionality. Any new products or product enhancements may not be accepted in new or existing markets. Our business will suffer if we fail to develop and introduce new products or product enhancements on a cost-effective basis.

 

If we fail to achieve initial design wins for our products, we may lose the opportunity for sales for a significant period of time to customers and be unable to recoup our investments in our products.

 

We expend considerable resources in order to achieve design wins for our products, especially our new products and product enhancements. Once a customer designs a semiconductor into a product, it is likely to continue to use the same semiconductor or enhanced versions of that semiconductor from the same supplier across a number of similar and successor products for a lengthy period of time due to the significant costs associated with qualifying a new supplier and potentially redesigning the product to incorporate a different semiconductor. If we fail to achieve an initial design win in a customer’s qualification process, we may lose the opportunity for significant sales to that customer for a number of its products and for a lengthy period of time. This may cause us to be unable to recoup our investments in our products, which would harm our business.

 

If we fail to develop, in a timely manner, or at all, technologies that address the demands of a shift from analog video signals to digital video signals our operating results could suffer.

 

Our semiconductors are principally designed to decode analog video signals into digital images. On June 12, 2009, transmission of broadcast TV signals were no longer permitted in analog and all broadcast signals must be in a digital format. Current forecasts project that many other electronic products and applications will similarly transition to digital transmission.  We are developing mixed signal and digital technologies to decode digital signals. However, transmission of digital video involves a combination of emerging technologies. The complexities of these technologies and the variability in implementations between manufacturers may cause our development of semiconductors to be costly and time-consuming. We may never obtain the benefits of our investment in developing

 

29



Table of Contents

 

these technologies. The complexities of digital broadcast technologies may also cause some of the semiconductors we are developing to ultimately work incorrectly for reasons that may be either related or unrelated to our products, or not be interoperable with other key products. Delays or difficulties in integrating our semiconductors into digital broadcast products or the failure of products incorporating digital video to achieve broad market acceptance could have an adverse effect on our business.

 

Our business is subject to seasonality, which is likely to cause our revenues to fluctuate.

 

Our business is subject to seasonality as a result of our target markets and the location of our customers. We sell a significant number of our semiconductors to customers located in Asia, primarily to customers located in regions who observe the Lunar New Year holiday, also referred to as Chinese New Year. Typically, our foreign offices and those of our customers are closed for a week or more during the extended holiday period. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, 93% and 91% of our revenues, respectively, was attributable to customers located in regions that observe the Lunar New Year holiday. As a result, we typically experience fluctuations in our first calendar quarter due in part to a slowing of business activity around the period of the Lunar New Year holiday.

 

We manufacture our products based on our estimates of customer demand, and if our estimates are incorrect our financial results could be negatively impacted.

 

Our sales are made on the basis of purchase orders rather than long-term purchase commitments. In addition, our customers may cancel purchase orders or defer the shipments of our products. We manufacture our products according to our estimates of customer demand. This process requires us to make multiple demand forecast assumptions, each of which may introduce error into our estimates. If we overestimate customer demand, we may manufacture products that we may not be able to sell. As a result, we would have excess inventory, which would increase our losses. Conversely, if we underestimate customer demand or if sufficient manufacturing capacity were unavailable, we would forego revenue opportunities, lose market share and damage our customer relationships.

 

We do not expect to sustain the growth rate of our recent revenues.

 

Our revenues increased 109% in 2005 from 2004 and 49% in 2006 from 2005. We do not expect to achieve similar growth rates in future periods. For example, our revenues increased 11% in 2007 from 2006 and 13% in 2008 compared to 2007 and decreased 21% in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008. You should not rely on the results of any prior quarterly or annual periods as an indication of our future operating performance. If we are unable to maintain adequate revenue growth, our stock price may decline and we may not have adequate financial resources to execute our business objectives.

 

We may pursue acquisitions or investments in complementary technologies and businesses, which could harm our operating results and may disrupt our business.

 

We have pursued and may continue to pursue acquisitions of, or investments in, complementary technologies and businesses. Acquisitions present a number of potential risks and challenges that could, if not successfully addressed, disrupt our business operations, increase our operating costs and reduce the value to us of the acquired company. Even if we are successful, we may not be able to integrate the acquired businesses, products or technologies into our existing business and products. Furthermore, potential acquisitions and investments, whether or not consummated, may divert management’s attention and require considerable cash outlays at the expense of existing operations. In addition, to complete future acquisitions, we may issue equity securities, incur debt, assume contingent liabilities or have amortization expenses and write-downs of acquired assets, which could adversely affect our profitability.

 

Changes in our tax rates will affect our future results.

 

Our future effective tax rates will be favorably or unfavorably affected by the absolute amount and future geographic distribution of our pre-tax income, our ability to take advantage of the available tax planning strategies and the availability of tax credits. In addition, we are subject to the examination of our income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. The outcomes of these examinations, when and if they occur, could harm our financial condition.

 

30



Table of Contents

 

We may not be able to manage our future growth effectively, and we may need to incur significant expenditures to address the additional operational and control requirements of our growth.

 

We have experienced a period of significant growth and expansion, which has placed, and any future expansion will continue to place, a significant strain on management, personnel, systems and financial resources. We have hired additional employees to support an increase in research and development as well as increase our sales and marketing efforts, which resulted in increasing our headcount from 96 employees at the end of 2006 to 165 employees at September 30, 2009. As a result of a recent acquisition, we added approximately 40 employees in October 2009. To manage our growth successfully, we believe we must effectively:

 

·                     train, integrate and manage additional qualified engineers for research and development activities, sales and marketing personnel and financial and information technology personnel;

·                     continue to enhance our customer resource management and manufacturing management systems;

·                     implement additional and improve existing administrative, financial and operations systems, procedures and controls, including the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;

·                     expand and upgrade our technological capabilities; and

·                     manage multiple relationships with our customers, distributors, suppliers and other third-parties.

 

Our efforts may require substantial managerial and financial resources and may increase our operating costs even though these efforts may not be successful. If we are unable to manage our growth effectively, we may not be able to take advantage of market opportunities, develop new products, satisfy customer requirements, execute our business plan or respond to competitive pressures.

 

We may experience unforeseen delays, expenses or lower than expected product yields for our semiconductors manufactured by our third-party vendors, which could increase our costs and prevent us from recognizing the benefits of new technologies we develop.

 

We occasionally have experienced delays in completing the development and introduction of new products and product enhancements, and we could experience delays in the future that may render our new or enhanced products, when introduced, obsolete and unmarketable. In addition, it is often difficult for semiconductor foundries to achieve satisfactory product yields. Product yields depend on both our product design and the manufacturing process technology unique to the semiconductor foundry. Since low yields may result from either design or process difficulties, identifying yield problems can only occur well into the production cycle after a product that can be physically analyzed and tested exists. Poor yields from our foundry could cause us to sell our products at lower gross margins and therefore harm our financial results.

 

Defects in our products could increase our costs, cause customer claims and delay our product shipments.

 

Although we test our products, they are complex and may contain defects and errors. In the past, we have encountered defects and errors in our products. For example, in the past, we were unable to sell certain products to a customer for whom these products were specifically designed as a result of our failure to produce a product that met this customer’s specifications. We believe this customer secured the product from another vendor. Delivery of products with defects or reliability, quality or compatibility problems may damage our reputation and our ability to retain existing customers and attract new customers. In addition, product defects and errors could result in additional development costs, diversion of technical resources, delayed product shipments, increased product returns and product liability claims against us, which may not be fully covered by insurance. Any of these could harm our business.

 

31



Table of Contents

 

We rely on a limited number of independent subcontractors for the manufacture, assembly and testing of our semiconductors, and the failure of any of these third-party vendors to deliver products or otherwise perform as requested could damage our relationships with our customers, decrease our sales and limit our growth.

 

We do not have our own manufacturing or assembly facilities and have very limited in-house testing facilities. Therefore, we must rely on third-party vendors to manufacture, assemble and test the products we design. We currently rely on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, or TSMC, to produce the majority of our semiconductors. We rely on Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc., or ASE, to assemble, package and test many of our products. If these vendors do not provide us with high-quality products, services and production and test capacity in a timely manner, or if one or more of these vendors terminates its relationship with us, we may be unable to obtain satisfactory replacements to fulfill customer orders on a timely basis, our relationships with our customers could suffer and our sales could decrease. Other significant risks associated with relying on these third-party vendors include:

 

·                     reduced control over product cost, delivery schedules and product quality;

·                     potential price increases;

·                     inability to achieve required production or test capacity and achieve acceptable yields on a timely basis;

·                     longer delivery times;

·                     increased exposure to potential misappropriation of our intellectual property;

·                     shortages of materials that foundries use to manufacture products;

·                     labor shortages or labor strikes; and

·                     quarantines or closures of manufacturing facilities due to the outbreak of viruses, such as SARS, the avian flu or any similar future outbreaks in Asia.

 

We currently do not have long-term supply contracts with any of our third-party vendors. Therefore, they are not obligated to perform services or supply products to us for any specific period, in any specific quantities or at any specific price, except as may be provided in a particular purchase order. Neither TSMC nor ASE has provided contractual assurances to us that adequate capacity will be available for us to meet future demand for our products. These third-party vendors may allocate capacity to the production of other companies’ products while reducing deliveries to us on short notice. In particular, other customers that are larger and better financed than we are or that have long-term agreements with TSMC or ASE may cause either or both of them to reallocate capacity to those customers, decreasing the capacity available to us.

 

We plan to retain additional foundries to manufacture our semiconductors, which could disrupt our current manufacturing process and negatively impact our sales volumes and revenue.

 

We are a fabless semiconductor company which relies on third-party manufacturers or foundries to manufacture our semiconductors. We are reliant on these foundries for the manufacture of our products as well as providing services to assist us in getting our products into production. As a result of the complexity in manufacturing our semiconductors, it is difficult to determine if a new foundry will be able to successfully produce our products. We may not be able to enter into a relationship with a new foundry that produces satisfactory yields on a cost-effective basis. If we need another foundry because of increased demand, or the inability to obtain timely and adequate deliveries from our current provider, we might not be able to cost-effectively and quickly retain other vendors to satisfy our requirements. Any failure to successfully integrate a new foundry could negatively impact our sales volumes and revenue.

 

Our business depends on customers, suppliers and operations in Asia, and as a result we are subject to regulatory, operational, financial and political risks, which could adversely affect our financial results.

 

The percentage of our revenues attributable to sales to customers in Asia was 97% and 98% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. We expect that revenues from customers in Asia will continue to account for substantially all of our revenues. All our sales currently are denominated in U.S. dollars. As a result, an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies could make our products less competitive in international markets.

 

32



Table of Contents

 

Currently, we maintain international sales offices in Asia, and we rely on a network of third-party sales representatives to sell our products internationally. We have offices in China, Japan, Taiwan and South Korea, which serve various aspects of our business. Moreover, we have in the past relied on, and expect to continue to rely on, suppliers, manufacturers and subcontractors primarily located in Taiwan. Accordingly, we are subject to several risks and challenges, any of which could harm our business and financial results. These risks and challenges include:

 

·                     difficulties and costs of staffing and managing international operations across different geographic areas and cultures;

·                     compliance with a wide variety of domestic and foreign laws and regulations, including those relating to the import or export of semiconductor products;

·                     legal uncertainties regarding taxes, tariffs, quotas, export controls, export licenses and other trade barriers;

·                     foreign currency exchange fluctuations relating to our international operating activities;

·                     our ability to receive timely payment and collect our accounts receivable;

·                     political, legal and economic instability, foreign conflicts and the impact of regional and global infectious illnesses, such as the SARS outbreak or avian flu in the countries in which we and our customers, suppliers, manufacturers and subcontractors are located;

·                     legal uncertainties regarding protection for intellectual property rights in some countries; and

·                     fluctuations in freight rates and transportation disruptions.

 

Our sales cycle can be lengthy, which could result in uncertainty and delays in generating revenue.

 

Because our products are based on constantly evolving technologies, we have experienced a lengthy sales cycle for some of our semiconductors, particularly those designed for digital video applications in the automotive infotainment market. Our sales cycle typically ranges from six to 24 months. We may experience a delay between the time we increase expenditures for research and development, sales and marketing efforts and inventory to the time we generate revenue, if any, from these expenditures. In addition, because we do not have long-term commitments from our customers, we must repeat our sales process on a continual basis even for current customers looking to purchase a new product. As a result, our business could be harmed if a customer reduces or delays its orders, chooses not to release products incorporating our semiconductors or elects not to purchase a new product or product enhancements from us.

 

We primarily sell our products through a limited number of distributors, and if our relationships with one or more of those distributors were to terminate, our operating results may be harmed.

 

We market and distribute our products primarily through a limited number of distributors, most of which are located in Asia. This distribution channel has been characterized by rapid change and consolidations. Distributors have accounted for a significant portion of our revenues in the past. Sales to our distributors represented 76% and 77% of our revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, Lacewood International Corporation accounted for 37% of our revenues.

 

Our operating results and financial condition could be significantly disrupted by the loss of one or more of our current distributors and sales representatives, volume pricing discounts, order cancellations, delays in shipment by one of our major distributors or sales representatives or the failure of our distributors or sales representatives to successfully sell our products.

 

We rely primarily upon copyright and trade secret laws and contractual restrictions to protect our proprietary rights and if these rights are not sufficiently protected, our ability to compete and generate revenue could suffer.

 

We seek to protect our proprietary design processes, documentation and other written materials primarily under trade secret and copyright laws. We also typically require employees and consultants with access to our proprietary information to execute confidentiality agreements. The steps taken by us to protect our proprietary information may not be adequate to prevent misappropriation of our technology. In addition, our proprietary rights may not be adequately protected because:

 

·                     the laws of other countries in which we market our semiconductors, such as some countries in the Asia/Pacific region, may offer little or no protection for our proprietary technologies;

·                     people may not be deterred from misappropriating our technologies despite the existence of laws or contracts prohibiting these actions; and

·                     policing unauthorized use of our intellectual property may be difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and we may be unable to determine the extent of any unauthorized use.

 

33



Table of Contents

 

Reverse engineering, unauthorized copying or other misappropriation of our proprietary technologies could enable third-parties to benefit from our technologies without compensating us for doing so. For example, if the foundry that manufactures our semiconductors loses control of our intellectual property, it would be more difficult for us to take remedial measures since it is located in Taiwan, which does not have the same protection for intellectual property as is provided in the United States. Any inability to adequately protect our proprietary rights could harm our ability to compete, generate revenue and grow our business.

 

We may not obtain sufficient patent protection on the technology embodied in the semiconductors we currently manufacture and market, which could harm our competitive position and increase our expenses.

 

Although we rely primarily on trade secret laws and contractual restrictions to protect the technology in the semiconductors we currently manufacture and market, our success and ability to compete in the future may also depend to a significant degree upon obtaining patent protection for our proprietary technology. As of December 31, 2008, we had two issued patents in the United States and five patent applications pending in the United States and two applications pending in foreign jurisdictions. These patents and patent applications cover aspects of the technology in the semiconductors we currently manufacture and market, including a patent for our video decoding architecture. Patents that we currently own do not cover all of the semiconductors that we presently manufacture and market. Our patent applications may not result in issued patents, and even if they result in issued patents, the patents may not have claims of the scope we seek. In addition, any issued patents may be challenged, invalidated or declared unenforceable. The term of any issued patents would be 20 years from its filing date and if our applications are pending for a long time period, we may have a correspondingly shorter term for any patent that may issue. Our issued patents have expiration dates ranging from September 2, 2019 to March 27, 2020. Our present and future patents may provide only limited protection for our technology and may not be sufficient to provide us with competitive advantages. For example, competitors could be successful in challenging any issued patents or, alternatively, could develop similar or more advantageous technologies on their own or design around our patents. Also, patent protection in certain foreign countries may not be available or may be limited in scope and any patents obtained may not be as readily enforceable as in the United States, making it difficult for us to effectively protect our intellectual property from misuse or infringement by anyone in these countries. Our inability to obtain and enforce our intellectual property rights in some countries may harm our business. In addition, given the costs of obtaining patent protection, we may choose not to protect certain innovations that later turn out to be important to our business or our competitive position.

 

Intellectual property litigation, which is common in our industry, could be costly, harm our reputation, limit our ability to sell our products and divert the attention of management and technical personnel.

 

Our industry is characterized by frequent litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. For example, during 2005 and 2006, we were a party to an administrative proceeding in front of the intellectual property tribunal in South Korea in which another party unsuccessfully sought a determination that our TW2824 and TW2834 products infringed a South Korean patent allegedly held by that party. We have certain indemnification obligations to customers under our contract development projects with respect to any infringement of third-party patents and intellectual property rights by our products. If a lawsuit were to be filed against us in connection with claims of infringement, our business would be harmed.

 

Questions of infringement in the digital video applications market involve highly technical and subjective analyses. Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce any patents we may receive and other intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others or to defend against claims of infringement or invalidity, and we may not prevail in any future litigation. Litigation, whether or not determined in our favor or settled, could be costly, could harm our reputation, could cause our customers to use our competitors’ products and could divert the efforts and attention of management and technical personnel from normal business operations. In addition, adverse determinations in litigation could result in the loss of our proprietary rights, subject us to significant liabilities, require us to seek licenses from third-parties or prevent us from licensing our technology or selling our products, any of which could seriously harm our business.

 

34



Table of Contents

 

Our headquarters are located in the State of California and our third-party manufacturing, assembly and testing vendors have facilities in the State of Washington and in Taiwan, areas subject to significant earthquake risks. Any disruption to our or their operations resulting from earthquakes or other natural disasters could cause significant delays in the production or shipment of our product.

 

TSMC, which manufactures substantially all of our semiconductors, has facilities in the State of Washington and in Taiwan. Our assembly and testing vendors’ facilities are primarily located in Taiwan. In addition, our headquarters are located in Northern California. The risk of an earthquake or extreme weather in the Pacific Rim region or an earthquake in Northern California or Washington State is significant due to the proximity of major earthquake fault lines. In September 1999, a major earthquake in Taiwan affected the facilities of TSMC and ASE, our primary assembly vendor, as well as other providers of foundry, packaging and test services. In March 2002 and June 2003, additional earthquakes occurred in Taiwan. In 2005, several typhoons also disrupted the operations of TSMC and ASE. As a result of these natural disasters, these contractors suffered power outages and disruptions that impaired their production capacity. The occurrence of earthquakes or other natural disasters could result in the disruption of our foundry or assembly and test capacity. We may not be able to obtain alternate capacity on favorable terms, if at all, which could harm our operating results.

 

Management may apply our cash, cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments to uses that do not increase our market value or improve our operating results.

 

We intend to use our cash, cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments for general corporate purposes, including working capital and capital expenditures. We may also use a portion of our cash, cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments to acquire or invest in complementary technologies, businesses or other assets. We have not reserved or allocated our cash, cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments for any specific purpose, and we cannot state with certainty how management will use our cash, cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments. Accordingly, management has considerable discretion in applying our cash, cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments and may use our cash, cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments for purposes that do not result in any increase in our results of operations or market value. Until the cash, cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments are used, they may be placed in investments that do not produce income or lose value.

 

Risks Related to Our Industry

 

Due to the cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry, our operating results may fluctuate significantly, which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

 

The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and subject to rapid change and evolving industry standards and, from time to time, has experienced significant downturns. These downturns are characterized by decreases in product demand, excess customer inventory and accelerated erosion of prices. These factors have caused and could cause substantial fluctuations in our revenue and in our operating results. Any downturns in the semiconductor industry may be severe and prolonged, and any failure of this industry to fully recover from downturns could harm our business. The semiconductor industry also periodically experiences increased demand and production capacity constraints, which may affect our ability to ship products. Accordingly, our operating results have varied and may vary significantly as a result of the general conditions in the semiconductor industry, which could cause our stock price to decline.

 

The recent financial crisis could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

The recent financial crises affecting the banking system and financial markets and the going concern threats to investment banks and other financial institutions have resulted in a tightening in the credit markets, a low level of liquidity in many financial markets and extreme volatility in credit and equity markets. There could be a number of follow on effects from the credit crisis on our business, including insolvency of key suppliers resulting in product delays, inability of customers to obtain credit to finance purchases of our products and customer insolvencies.

 

35



Table of Contents

 

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

 

Our stock price has been volatile and you may not be able to resell shares of our common stock at or above the price you paid, or at all.

 

The trading price of our common stock has experienced wide fluctuations due to the factors discussed in this risk factors section and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. For example, in the three months ended September 30, 2009, the closing price of our stock ranged from a low of $8.03 on July 7, 2009 to a high of $11.09 on September 28, 2009. In addition, the stock market in general has, and The NASDAQ Global Market and technology companies in particular have, experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. These trading prices and valuations may not be sustainable. These broad market and industry factors may decrease the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. In addition, in the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies that experienced such volatility. This litigation, if instituted against us, regardless of its outcome, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.

 

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they change their recommendations regarding our stock adversely, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

 

The trading market for our common stock is influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our stock, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

 

Our ability to raise capital in the future may be limited and our failure to raise capital when needed could prevent us from executing our growth strategy.

 

We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for at least the next 12 months. The timing and amount of our working capital and capital expenditure requirements may vary significantly depending on numerous factors, including:

 

·                     market acceptance of our products;

·                     the need to adapt to changing technologies and technical requirements;

·                     the existence of opportunities for expansion; and

·                     access to and availability of sufficient management, technical, marketing and financial personnel.

 

If our capital resources are insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, we may seek to sell additional equity securities or debt securities or obtain debt financing. The sale of additional equity securities or convertible debt securities would result in additional dilution to our stockholders. Additional debt would result in increased expenses and could result in covenants that would restrict our operations. We have not made arrangements to obtain additional financing and there is no assurance that financing, if required, will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

 

Substantial future sales of our common stock in the public market could cause our stock price to fall.

 

Additional sales of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. At September 30, 2009, we had 21.6 million shares of common stock outstanding. A substantial portion of these shares of common stock are entitled to rights to cause us to register the sale of those shares under the Securities Act. Registration of these shares under the Securities Act would result in these shares, other than shares purchased by our affiliates, becoming freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act immediately upon the effectiveness of the registration.

 

36



Table of Contents

 

Our corporate actions are substantially controlled by officers, directors, principal stockholders and affiliated entities.

 

Our directors, executive officers and affiliated entities beneficially own a significant percentage of our outstanding common stock. These stockholders, if they acted together, could exert substantial control over matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including electing directors and approving mergers or other business combination transactions. This concentration of ownership may also discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company, which could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their stock as part of a sale of our company and might reduce our stock price. These actions may be taken even if they are opposed by our other stockholders.

 

Certain provisions of Delaware law, our corporate charter and bylaws and our shareholder rights plan contain anti-takeover provisions that could delay or discourage takeover attempts that stockholders may consider favorable.

 

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation, as amended and restated, may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or changes in our management. These provisions include the following:

 

·                     the right of the board of directors to elect a director to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the board of directors;

·                     the prohibition of cumulative voting in the election of directors, which would otherwise allow less than a majority of stockholders to elect director candidates;

·                     the requirement for advance notice for nominations for election to the board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon at a stockholders’ meeting;

·                     the ability of the board of directors to alter our bylaws without obtaining stockholder approval;

·                     the ability of the board of directors to issue, without stockholder approval, up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock with terms set by the board of directors, which rights could be senior to those of common stock;

·                     the required approval of holders of at least two-thirds of the shares entitled to vote at an election of directors to adopt, amend or repeal our bylaws or amend or repeal the provisions of our certificate of incorporation regarding the indemnification of directors and officers and the ability of stockholders to take action;

·                     the required approval of holders of at least a majority of the shares entitled to vote at an election of directors to remove directors for cause; and

·                     the elimination of the right of stockholders to call a special meeting of stockholders and to take action by written consent.

 

In addition, our stockholder rights plan would cause substantial dilution to any person or group who attempts to acquire a significant interest in us without advance approval from our board of directors.

 

While these provisions and our stockholder rights plan have the effect of encouraging persons seeking to acquire control of our company to negotiate with our board of directors, the provisions could enable the board of directors to hinder or frustrate a transaction that some, or a majority, of the stockholders might believe to be in their best interests and, in that case, may prevent or discourage attempts to remove and replace incumbent directors.

 

Because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. These provisions may prohibit or restrict large stockholders, in particular those owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock, from merging or combining with us.

 

These provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, stockholder rights plan and under Delaware law could discourage potential takeover attempts and could reduce the price that investors might be willing to pay for shares of our common stock in the future and result in our market price being lower than it would without these provisions.

 

37



Table of Contents

 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

Not applicable

 

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

Not applicable

 

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

Not applicable

 

Item 5. Other Information

 

Not applicable

 

Item 6. Exhibits

 

a.     Exhibits

 

Exhibit
Number

 

Description

3.1

 

Certificate of Designation of Techwell, Inc. classifying and designating the Series A Participating Preferred Stock, as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on August 4, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K which was filed on August 5, 2009).

4.1

 

Rights Agreement, dated as of August 4, 2009, between Techwell, Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as Rights Agent (which includes as Exhibit A the Certificate of Designation of Series A Participating Stock, as Exhibit B the form of Rights Certificate, and as Exhibit C the Summary of Rights) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A relating to the Series A Participating Preferred Stock Purchase Rights which was filed on August 5, 2009).

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act rules 13a-15(e), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act rules 13a-15(e), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1 (1)

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2 (1)

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 


(1)          The material contained in Exhibit 32.1 and Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

38



Table of Contents

 

Signatures

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

Date: November 6, 2009

/s/ Fumihiro Kozato

 

Fumihiro Kozato

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

Date: November 6, 2009

/s/ Mark Voll

 

Mark Voll

 

Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer

 

39



Table of Contents

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit
Number

 

Description

3.1

 

Certificate of Designation of Techwell, Inc. classifying and designating the Series A Participating Preferred Stock, as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on August 4, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K which was filed on August 5, 2009).

4.1

 

Rights Agreement, dated as of August 4, 2009, between Techwell, Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as Rights Agent (which includes as Exhibit A the Certificate of Designation of Series A Participating Stock, as Exhibit B the form of Rights Certificate, and as Exhibit C the Summary of Rights) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A relating to the Series A Participating Preferred Stock Purchase Rights which was filed on August 5, 2009).

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act rules 13a-15(e), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act rules 13a-15(e), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1 (1)

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2 (1)

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 


(1)          The material contained in Exhibit 32.1 and Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

40