Attached files
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 25, 2009
OR
¨ | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number: 000-31715
Jagged Peak, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Nevada | 91-2007478 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
3000 Bayport Drive, Suite 250, Tampa, FL 33607
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(813) 637-6900
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x YES ¨ NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ¨ Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer | ¨ | Accelerated Filer | ¨ | |||
Non-Accelerated Filer | ¨ | Smaller Reporting Company | x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x
The Registrant has 14,677,594 shares of common stock outstanding as of November 5, 2009.
Table of Contents
Jagged Peak, Inc.
Contents
Table of Contents
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION
1
Table of Contents
Consolidated Balance Sheets
September 25, 2009 (Unaudited) |
December 26, 2008 (Audited) |
|||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash |
$ | 149,200 | $ | 126,500 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $240,000 and $230,000 at September 25, 2009 and December 26, 2008, respectively |
1,671,000 | 1,923,800 | ||||||
Other receivables |
123,000 | 135,000 | ||||||
Work in process, net of allowance of $30,000 at September 25, 2009 and December 26, 2008 |
109,100 | 149,700 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset |
192,200 | 268,600 | ||||||
Other current assets |
150,100 | 443,800 | ||||||
Total current assets |
2,394,600 | 3,047,400 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $2,041,700 and $1,885,700 at September 25, 2009 and December 26, 2008, respectively |
243,900 | 327,400 | ||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||
EDGE and other applications, net of accumulated amortization of $1,370,200 and $1,318,100 at September 25, 2009 and December 26, 2008, respectively |
353,100 | 79,400 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset |
1,422,800 | 1,138,700 | ||||||
Total long-term assets |
2,019,800 | 1,545,500 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 4,414,400 | $ | 4,592,900 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable, trade |
$ | 1,551,000 | $ | 1,641,500 | ||||
Accrued payroll and bonuses |
374,800 | 407,800 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses |
77,200 | 61,900 | ||||||
Revolving Note, $80,900 and $1,000,000 was available at September 25, 2009 and December 26, 2008, respectively |
393,700 | 0 | ||||||
Deferred rent |
34,900 | 34,900 | ||||||
Notes payable |
1,010,000 | 1,415,000 | ||||||
Deferred revenue and customer deposits |
937,800 | 600,200 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
4,379,400 | 4,161,300 | ||||||
Long-term liabilities: |
||||||||
Deferred rent, long term |
29,200 | 57,200 | ||||||
Total long-term liabilities |
29,200 | 57,200 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding at September 25, 2009 and December 26, 2008 |
||||||||
Common stock, $.001 par value; 70,000,000 shares authorized; 14,677,594 shares issued and outstanding at September 25, 2009 and December 26, 2008 |
14,800 | 14,800 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
3,391,400 | 3,388,400 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(3,400,400 | ) | (3,028,800 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
5,800 | 374,400 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 4,414,400 | $ | 4,592,900 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
Thirteen Week Period Ended | Thirty-Nine Week Period Ended | ||||||||||||||
September 25, 2009 |
September 26, 2008 |
September 25, 2009 |
September 26, 2008 |
||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 4,097,400 | $ | 4,225,500 | $ | 11,700,900 | $ | 12,029,800 | |||||||
Cost of revenues |
3,103,700 | 2,991,200 | 8,741,600 | 8,755,100 | |||||||||||
Gross profit |
993,700 | 1,234,300 | 2,959,300 | 3,274,700 | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
1,026,700 | 1,081,700 | 3,190,000 | 3,076,700 | |||||||||||
Operating (loss) income |
(33,000 | ) | 152,600 | (230,700 | ) | 198,000 | |||||||||
Other expenses, net |
1,200 | 1,200 | |||||||||||||
Interest expense |
115,500 | 129,200 | 347,400 | 394,600 | |||||||||||
Profit (loss) before tax (benefit) expense |
(149,700 | ) | 23,400 | (579,300 | ) | (196,600 | ) | ||||||||
Provision for income tax (benefit) expense |
(58,100 | ) | 14,300 | (207,700 | ) | (52,100 | ) | ||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (91,600 | ) | $ | 9,100 | $ | (371,600 | ) | $ | (144,500 | ) | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding basic |
14,677,594 | 14,659,261 | 14,677,594 | 14,639,354 | |||||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding fully diluted |
14,677,594 | 14,975,555 | 14,677,594 | 14,639,354 | |||||||||||
Net loss per share basic & fully diluted |
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity
39 Week Period Ended September 25, 2009 (Unaudited)
Common Stock | Additional Paid in Capital |
Accumulated Deficit |
Total | |||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||
Balance, December 26, 2008 |
14,677,594 | $ | 14,800 | $ | 3,388,400 | $ | (3,028,800 | ) | $ | 374,400 | ||||||
Amortization of officer, director, consultant and employee equity compensation |
3,000 | 3,000 | ||||||||||||||
Net loss for the period |
(371,600 | ) | (371,600 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balance, September 25, 2009 |
14,677,594 | $ | 14,800 | $ | 3,391,400 | $ | (3,400,400 | ) | $ | 5,800 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
39 Week Period Ended | ||||||||
September 25, 2009 |
September 26, 2008 |
|||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (371,600 | ) | $ | (144,500 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
208,100 | 209,800 | ||||||
Non-cash consulting expense |
8,800 | |||||||
Non-cash amortization of officers, director and employees equity compensation |
3,000 | 40,600 | ||||||
Amortization of warrants related to long term debt |
241,000 | 241,000 | ||||||
Adjustment to allowance for bad debt expense |
134,100 | 84,300 | ||||||
Changes in: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
118,700 | 688,600 | ||||||
Work-in-process |
40,600 | (81,600 | ) | |||||
Other receivables |
12,000 | 13,000 | ||||||
Other current assets |
52,700 | (28,400 | ) | |||||
Deferred tax asset and liability, net |
(207,700 | ) | (52,100 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable |
(90,500 | ) | (252,000 | ) | ||||
Accrued payroll |
(33,000 | ) | 9,500 | |||||
Accrued expenses |
15,300 | (11,500 | ) | |||||
Deferred rent |
(28,000 | ) | (20,600 | ) | ||||
Other liabilities |
337,600 | 152,000 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
432,300 | 856,900 | ||||||
Investing activities |
||||||||
Acquisition of property and equipment |
(72,500 | ) | (114,700 | ) | ||||
Acquisition/development of software/ Edge platform |
(325,800 | ) | (20,700 | ) | ||||
Cash flows used by investing activities |
(398,300 | ) | (135,400 | ) | ||||
Financing activities |
||||||||
Net proceeds and payments on the revolving note |
393,700 | (165,300 | ) | |||||
Payments on notes payable |
(405,000 | ) | (405,000 | ) | ||||
Cash flows used by financing activities |
(11,300 | ) | (570,300 | ) | ||||
Net increase in cash |
22,700 | 151,200 | ||||||
Cash, beginning of period |
126,500 | 74,000 | ||||||
Cash, end of period |
$ | 149,200 | $ | 225,200 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for taxes |
$ | $ | ||||||
Cash paid during the period for interest |
$ | 106,400 | $ | 155,600 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
For the 13 and 39-Week Periods Ended September 25, 2009 and the 13 and
39-Week Periods Ended September 26, 2008
1. | General Background Information |
Jagged Peak, Inc. (the Company or Jagged Peak) is an e-business software and services company headquartered in Tampa, Florida, providing Demand and Supply Chain management, CRM execution and e-Fulfillment solutions and services. The Companys flagship product, EDGE (E-Business Dynamic Global Engine), is a web-based software application that enables companies to control and coordinate multi-channel orders, catalogs, multi-warehouse inventories, and fulfillment across multiple customers, suppliers, employees, and partners in real-time. The Companys clients are able to build and operate custom branded portals such as e-commerce, incentive and rebate programs, customer service, repair and reverse logistics and automate other business processes through the use of the EDGE application and its related tools. The EDGE platform has been deployed in multiple vertical markets such as consumer goods, financial services, distribution, travel and tourism and manufacturing.
Jagged Peaks multi-channel, enterprise EDGE application provides a comprehensive, integrated platform for e-business management that supports a broad range of business and operational applications. Clients can use EDGE as an enterprise application or as an integrator and consolidator for multiple businesses, processes and applications. EDGE has built in tools to extend the application which enables clients to create complex and robust e-commerce, CRM related customer services and repair and reverse logistics solutions. The EDGE application permits users to manage order capturing, processing, tracking, fulfillment, settlement, creating and managing dynamic catalogs, customer relation management, marketing and reporting, all in real-time application. The EDGE application is built to industry-standard best practices. The application has been integrated seamlessly with legacy and back-office management systems as well as industry leading ERP, WMS, TMS and CRM software systems. In addition to the traditional software license sales model, Jagged Peak offers its software with a flexible managed services transaction based pricing model.
Jagged Peak provides outsourced e-commerce and supply chain solutions that enable manufacturers, distributors, and consumer brand companies the ability to quickly and cost effectively establish and operate a direct to customer online business that is fully integrated with their offline sales channels. Jagged Peaks proven solutions provide companies the tools, expertise, infrastructure and scalability they need to create and maximize their direct to customer sales channel potential without the risk and burden of managing it themselves. The Company uniquely provides companies the benefit of maintaining complete control of the channel, ownership of the customer relationship and retention of the gross product margin normally lost to distributors, resellers and other trading partners.
Jagged Peak recently announced the launch of TotalCommerce, a solution that includes everything a company needs to quickly and cost effectively launch a fully operational, best practices direct to consumer sales channel in less than 60 days. TotalCommerce is an outsourced managed services solution that leverages Jagged Peaks extensive technology and supply chain infrastructure and provides manufacturers with a turnkey, rapidly deployable solution including e-commerce webstore(s); order, inventory and transportation management software; a nationwide network of fulfillment centers; back office program management; and a range of online marketing services.
Jagged Peak has a network of independently owned fulfillment warehouses throughout North America that enables its clients to provide better service to their customers, while lowering their overall delivery costs. The EDGE application is able to automatically route the orders to the optimal warehouse based on an established set of factors such as service, cost and priority. This enables our clients to achieve their customer service goals while reducing cost and internal infrastructure.
6
Table of Contents
In July 2009, Jagged Peak began operations in Canada through its wholly owned subsidiary, Jagged Peak Canada, Inc. The operations provide similar services as in the United States through a network of independently owned fulfillment warehouses, which are managed through technology provided by Jagged Peak, Inc.
Effective January 1, 2003, the Company elected to change its fiscal year end to correspond to accounting periods based on a 52/53 week reporting year. Therefore, the periods ended September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008 both consist of 13 and 39 weeks.
2. | Significant Accounting Policies |
Basis of Presentation
In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of (a) the consolidated financial position at September 25, 2009, (b) the consolidated results of operations for the 13 and 39 weeks ended September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008, (c) the consolidated statement of changes in stockholders equity for the 39 week period ended September 25, 2009, and (d) the consolidated cash flows for the 39 weeks ended September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008, have been made.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes are presented as permitted by Form 10-Q. Accordingly, certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted. The accompanying statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes of the Company for the 52-week period ended December 26, 2008.
Use of Estimates
The Company prepares its financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company reviews its estimates, including but not limited to, capitalization of software, work in process, recoverability of long-lived assets, recoverability of prepaid expenses, valuation on deferred tax assets and allowance for doubtful accounts, on a regular basis and makes adjustments based on historical experiences and existing and expected future conditions. These evaluations are performed and adjustments are made as information is available. Management believes that these estimates are reasonable and have been discussed with the audit committee; however, actual results could differ from these estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from software license agreements is recognized when an agreement exists, delivery of the software has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability is probable. In software arrangements that include more than one element, the Company allocates the total arrangement fee among the elements based on the relative fair value of each of the elements. Maintenance and support agreement revenues are amortized over the contract period, which is usually one year.
Additional technology revenues are derived from software development services, managed services, transaction fees, and consulting and customized technology assignments. Revenue from technology service arrangements and software development services is
7
Table of Contents
recognized as services are provided or on the percentage of completion method for those arrangements with specified milestones. The percentage of completion is based on labor hours incurred to total labor hours expected to be incurred.
Revenue is also derived from fulfillment service arrangements. Services included under fulfillment arrangements include account services, shipping and handling, order processing, packaging, storage and reporting. These services are based on established monthly charges as well as handling fees based on volume. Work in process represents unbilled costs and services. Shipping and handling costs are classified as cost of revenue.
Software and Development Enhancements
Software development costs, including costs to develop software products or the software component of products to be marketed to external users, as well as software programs to be used solely to meet our internal needs, are accounted for in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Software and development enhancements expenses include costs such as payroll and employee benefit costs associated with product development. The EDGE product platform, including the order management, the warehouse management and the transportation management systems are continually being enhanced with new features and functions. Once technological feasibility of new features and functions is established, the cost incurred until release to production is capitalized and once in production the enhancements are amortized over a three-year useful life.
There was approximately $69,100 capitalized during the 13 week period ended September 25, 2009 and approximately $325,800 capitalized during the 39 week period ended September 25, 2009 and there was no amount capitalized during the 13 week period ended September 26, 2008 and approximately $20,700 capitalized during the 39 week period ended September 26, 2008. Amortization expense related to capitalized software and charged to operations for the 13 week and 39 week periods ended September 25, 2009 was approximately $29,800 and $52,100, respectively. Amortization expense related to capitalized software and charged to operations for the 13 week and 39 week periods ended September 26, 2008 was approximately $8,500 and $58,000, respectively.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, money in the process of being swept from the lockbox and investments in money market funds with high quality financial institutions. The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with a remaining maturity of less than three months at the time of purchase as cash equivalents.
Concentration of Risk
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, are cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivables.
The majority of cash is maintained with a major financial institution in the United States. Deposits with this bank may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand, and, therefore, bear minimal risk.
During the 39-week periods ended September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008, sales to one customer amounted to approximately $8,897,300 and $7,565,900, respectively, or 76% and 63% of total revenues, respectively. Accounts receivable from the same customer at September 25, 2009 amounted to approximately $1,111,000 or approximately 58% of the balance. Accounts receivable from two customers at September 26, 2008 amounted to approximately $772,000 or approximately 41% of the balance. This customer is a large international company with more than one hundred brands and we continue to expand services to additional brands. The Company classifies all business done for all of this customers brands as one single customer for the concentration of risk calculation.
8
Table of Contents
The Company extends credit to its various customers based on evaluation of the customers financial condition and ability to pay the Company in accordance with the payment terms. The Company provides for estimated losses on accounts receivable considering a number of factors, including the overall aging of accounts receivables, customers payment history and the customers current ability to pay its obligation. Based on managements review of accounts receivable and other receivables, an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $240,000 and $230,000 is considered necessary as of September 25, 2009 and December 26, 2008, respectively. Although management believes that accounts receivable are recorded at their net realizable value, a 10% decline in historical collection rate would increase the current bad debt expense for the period ended September 25, 2009 by approximately $10,000. We do not accrue interest on past due receivables.
Identified Intangible Assets
The Company reviews long-lived assets to be held and used for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. If the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows over the remaining useful life of a long-lived asset is less than its carrying amount, the asset is considered to be impaired. Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. When fair values are not available, the Company estimates fair value using the expected future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risks associated with the recovery of the asset. For the 39-week period ended September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008, there was no impairment of long-lived or intangible assets.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, principally three to ten years. Accelerated methods are used for tax depreciation. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations when incurred. Betterments and renewals are capitalized. When property and equipment are sold or otherwise disposed of, the asset account and related accumulated depreciation account are relieved, and any gain or loss is included in operations. Equipment held under capital leases is stated at the present value of the minimum lease payments and amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset.
Depreciation is calculated by the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives of the related assets:
Years | ||
Furniture and equipment |
3-7 | |
Computer equipment and software |
1-4 | |
Warehouse equipment |
3-10 | |
Leasehold improvements |
Lease term |
Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The aggregated net fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values. These financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, receivables, payables, accrued expenses and short-term borrowings. Fair values were assumed to approximate carrying values for these financial instruments since they are short-term in nature and their carrying amounts approximate fair values or they are receivable or payable on demand. The fair value of the Companys debt is estimated based on the current rates offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities.
9
Table of Contents
Income Taxes
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been reflected in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the book values and the tax bases of particular assets and liabilities and the tax effects of net operating loss and capital loss carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in the tax rate is recognized as income or expense in the period that included the enactment date. Through its reverse acquisition of Absolute Glass, the Company acquired net operating losses for tax purposes of approximately $2.4 million or a deferred tax asset of approximately $900,000. Internal Revenue Code Sec. 382 places limitations on the utilization of the acquired net operating losses. Due to the possible limitation on taking advantage of these acquired net operating losses, the Company has placed a full valuation allowance against that asset of approximately $900,000
Stock-Based Compensation
Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States require all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. The Company is required to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for stock options and similar awards based on the grant-date fair value of the award and recognize this cost in the statement of operations over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award.
Companies must choose among alternative valuation models and amortization assumptions. After assessing alternative valuation models and amortization assumptions, the Company uses the Black-Scholes valuation model and has elected to use the ratable method to amortize compensation expense over the vesting period of the grant.
The value of each grant is estimated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option model with the following weighted average assumptions for options granted in 2008: the historical dividend rate of 0%; the risk-free interest rate of approximately 4%, for periods within the contractual life of the option, based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant; the expected term of 5 years, which was calculated based on the Companys historical pattern of options granted and expected to be outstanding; and expected volatility of 175%, which was calculated by review of the Companys historical activity as well as comparable peer companies; and an option exercise experience rate for employees of 50% based on the Companys historical rate of employee options being forfeited prior to expiration or termination.
The value of each grant is estimated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option model with the following weighted average assumptions for options granted in 2009: the historical dividend rate of 0%; the risk-free interest rate of between approximately 2.4% and 3.8%, for periods within the contractual life of the option, based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant; the expected term of 5 years, which was calculated based on the Companys historical pattern of options granted and expected to be outstanding; and expected volatility of between 195% and 160%, which was calculated by review of the Companys historical activity as well as comparable peer companies; and an option exercise experience rate for employees of 50% based on the Companys historical rate of employee options being forfeited prior to expiration or termination.
10
Table of Contents
There were 200,000 options granted during the 39-week period ended September 25, 2009 and 125,000 options granted during the 39-week period ended September 26, 2008. As of September 25, 2009, there was approximately $9,000 of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to nonvested stock options.
The following table represents our nonvested stock option activity for the 39-week period ended September 25, 2009:
Number of Options |
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | ||||
Nonvested options December 26, 2008 |
50,000 | $ | 0.19 | ||
Granted |
200,000 | $ | 0.13 | ||
Vested |
|||||
Expired |
50,000 | $ | 0.19 | ||
Nonvested options September 25, 2009 |
200,000 | $ | 0.13 | ||
There was no aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding at September 25, 2009, based on the Companys closing stock price of $0.14 as of the last business day of the period ended September 25, 2009, which would have been received by the optionees had all options been exercised on that date. There was no aggregate intrinsic value of options exercisable at September 25, 2009, based on the Companys closing stock price of $0.14 as of the last business day of the period ended September 25, 2009, which would have been received by the optionees had all options exercisable been exercised on that date. There were no options exercised during the 39-weeks ended September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008.
Foreign Currency
Generally, the functional currency of our international subsidiary is the local currency. The financial statements are translated to U.S. dollars using month-end rates of exchange for assets and liabilities, and average rates of exchange for revenues, costs and expenses. Translation gains and losses are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as a component of stockholders equity. There was no recorded translation gains for the 13 and 39 week periods ended September 25, 2009. Net gains and losses resulting from foreign exchange transactions are recorded as a component of interest income and other, net. We recorded $1,200 of net losses for the 13 and 39 week periods ended September 25, 2009 from assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than the local currency.
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the related period. Diluted earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding and dilutive options outstanding during the year. The weighted average number of shares was approximately 14,677,594 and 14,639,354 for the 39-week periods ended September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008, respectively. The diluted weighted average number of shares was approximately 14,990,647 and 14,958,084 for the 39-week periods ended September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008, respectively.
11
Table of Contents
The weighted average number of shares was approximately 14,677,594 and 14,659,261 for the 13-week periods ended September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008, respectively. The diluted weighted average number of shares was approximately 14,990,887 and 14,975,555 for the 13-week periods ended September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008, respectively.
Common stock equivalents for the 39-week periods ended September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008 were anti-dilutive due to the net losses sustained by the Company during these periods. Therefore, the diluted weighted average common shares outstanding for the dilutive weighted average share calculation in the 39-week periods ended September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008 excludes approximately 313,053 and 318,730 shares that could dilute earnings per share in future periods, respectively.
Common stock equivalents for the 13-week period ended September 25, 2009 was anti-dilutive due to the net losses sustained by the Company during that period. Therefore, the diluted weighted average common shares outstanding for the dilutive weighted average share calculation in the 13-week period ended September 25, 2009 excludes approximately 313,293 shares that could dilute earnings per share in future periods, respectively.
Recently Issued Financial Accounting Standards
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued, Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, which modifies accounting for multiple element arrangements by requiring that the separation of the arrangements be based on estimated selling prices based on entity specific assumptions rather than fair value, eliminating the residual method of allocation and requiring additional disclosures related to such arrangements. The standard is effective prospectively for arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company has not yet evaluated the impact the adoption of the standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued, Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements, which amends software revenue recognition guidance to eliminate from its scope tangible products containing software components that function together to deliver the tangible products essential functionality and to provide guidance on how to allocate arrangement consideration to deliverables in an arrangement that contain both tangible products and software. The standard is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company has not yet evaluated the impact the adoption of the standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2009, the FASB issued changes to fair value accounting for liabilities. These changes clarify existing guidance that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, an entity is required to measure fair value using either a valuation technique that uses a quoted price of either a similar liability or a quoted price of an identical or similar liability when traded as an asset, or another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurements, such as an income approach (e.g., present value technique). This guidance also states that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability and a quoted price for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements. Management has determined that the adoption of these changes will not have an impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative
12
Table of Contents
GAAP for SEC registrants. The FASB will no longer issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts; instead the FASB will issue Accounting Standards Updates. Accounting Standards Updates will not be authoritative in their own right as they will only serve to update the Codification. Management has determined that the adoption of these changes will not have an impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Amendments to Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities to require an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprises variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity; to require ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity; to eliminate the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity; to add an additional reconsideration event for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity when any changes in facts and circumstances occur such that holders of the equity investment are at risk, as a group, lose the power from voting rights or similar rights of those investments to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance; and to require enhanced disclosures that will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprises involvement in a variable interest entity. Management has determined that the adoption of these changes will not have an impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued Subsequent Events, which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date, but before the financial statements are issued or available to be issued (subsequent events). This requires disclosure of the date through which the entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date. For public entities, this is the date the financial statements are issued. This does not apply to subsequent events or transactions that are within the scope of other GAAP and will not result in significant changes in the subsequent events reported by the Company. The Company evaluated subsequent events through November 5, 2009, the issuance date of the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by FASB (including EITF), the AICPA and the SEC did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Companys present or future financial statements.
3. | Other Assets |
Other assets consist of:
September 25, 2009 | December 26, 2008 | |||||
Capitalized debt cost |
$ | 67,000 | $ | $308,400 | ||
Current portion classified as other current asset |
67,000 | 308,400 | ||||
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | |||
4. | Equity |
Common Stock
Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote. The holders of common stock are also entitled to receive dividends whenever funds are legally available and when declared by the Board of Directors (the Board), subject to the prior rights of the holders of all classes of stock outstanding. The Company records stock as issued when the consideration is received or the obligation is incurred.
13
Table of Contents
The Companys 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended in July 2008, (the Plan) grants the Board of Directors the authority to grant up to 5,000,000 options to key employees, officers, directors, and consultants. The aggregate fair market value of grants to one individual shall not exceed $100,000 during any one calendar year for grants of both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options. Options granted under the Plan must be exercised within ten years of the date of grant. The Option Price payable for the shares of Common Stock covered by any Option shall be determined by the Board of Directors, but with regards to Incentive Stock Options, shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of one share of Common Stock on the Date of Grant. The Option Price for Nonstatutory Options may be less than the Fair Market Value of Common Stock on the Date of Grant only if the Board determines that special circumstances warrant a lower exercise price.
The Companys 2000 Stock Incentive Plan authorizes up to 100,000 shares of common stock to any employee or Consultant during any one calendar year for grants of both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options to key employees, officers, directors, and consultants. Options granted under the Plan must be exercised within ten years of the date of grant. The Option Price payable for the shares of Common Stock covered by any Option shall be determined by the Board of Directors, but shall in no event be less than the par value of Common Stock. The Option Price for Incentive Stock Options shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of one share of Common Stock on the Date of Grant. The Option Price for Nonstatutory Options may be less than the Fair Market Value of Common Stock on the Date of Grant only if the Board determines that special circumstances warrant a lower exercise price.
The following summarizes the Companys stock option and warrant activity and related information:
Shares | Range of Exercise Prices |
Weighted Average Exercise Price | |||||||
Outstanding at December 28, 2007 |
4,389,898 | $ | 0.01 - 2.50 | $ | 0.84 | ||||
Warrants, Convertible Debt and options granted |
125,000 | $ | 0.30 - 0.50 | $ | 0.38 | ||||
Warrants and options cancelled or expired |
(615,000 | ) | $ | 0.55 - 1.00 | $ | 0.98 | |||
Outstanding at December 26, 2008 |
3,899,898 | $ | 0.01 - 2.50 | $ | 0.80 | ||||
Warrants, Convertible Debt and options granted |
200,000 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.25 | ||||
Warrants and options cancelled or expired |
(502,058 | ) | $ | 0.50 - 1.28 | $ | 0.98 | |||
Outstanding at September 25, 2009 |
3,597,840 | $ | 0.01 - 2.50 | $ | 0.74 | ||||
Exercisable at September 25, 2009 |
3,397,840 | $ | 0.01 - 2.50 | $ | 0.77 | ||||
Exercisable at December 26, 2008 |
3,849,898 | $ | 0.01 - 2.50 | $ | 0.80 |
14
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes information about options and warrants outstanding and exercisable as of September 25, 2009:
Range of Exercise Price |
Outstanding Warrants and Options | Exercisable Warrants and Options | ||||||||||||
Number Outstanding |
Weighted |
Weighted Average Price |
Weighted Average Remaining Life |
Number Exercisable |
Weighted Average Price | |||||||||
$0.01 |
334,899 | 1.6 years | $ | 0.01 | 1.6 years | 334,899 | $ | 0.01 | ||||||
$0.25-0.77 |
1,718,529 | 2.0 years | $ | 0.59 | 1.9 years | 1,518,529 | $ | 0.61 | ||||||
$1.00-2.50 |
1,544,412 | 0.6 years | $ | 1.10 | 0.6 years | 1,544,412 | $ | 1.10 |
As of September 25, 2009 and December 26, 2008, there were 3,397,840 and 3,849,898 options exercisable at a weighted average exercise price of $0.77 and $0.80, respectively. The weighted average fair value of options at the date of grant of the options was $0.27 and $0.27 for 2009 and 2008, respectively.
5. | Related Party Transaction |
The Company contracted with Norco Accounting and Consulting Inc. (Norco) to provide accounting and consulting services. The Company spent approximately $12,900 and $24,500 during the 39-week periods ended September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008, respectively. Norco is 50% owned by Andrew J. Norstrud, who joined the Company in October of 2005, as the Companys Chief Financial Officer. The Company continues to occasionally use Norco for temporary accounting staffing needs under the contract signed prior to Andrew J. Norstrud joining the Company.
The above related party transactions are not necessarily indicative of the amounts and terms that would have been incurred had comparable transactions been entered into with independent parties.
15
Table of Contents
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
THIS FILING CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THE WORDS ANTICIPATED, BELIEVE, EXPECT, PLAN, INTEND, SEEK, ESTIMATE, PROJECT, WILL, COULD, MAY, AND SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS ARE INTENDED TO IDENTIFY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THESE STATEMENTS INCLUDE, AMONG OTHERS, INFORMATION REGARDING FUTURE OPERATIONS, FUTURE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES, AND FUTURE NET CASH FLOW. SUCH STATEMENTS REFLECT THE COMPANYS CURRENT VIEWS WITH RESPECT TO FUTURE EVENTS AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE AND INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, GENERAL ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS CONDITIONS, CHANGES IN FOREIGN, POLITICAL, SOCIAL, AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS, REGULATORY INITIATIVES AND COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS, THE ABILITY TO ACHIEVE FURTHER MARKET PENETRATION AND ADDITIONAL CUSTOMERS, AND VARIOUS OTHER MATTERS, MANY OF WHICH ARE BEYOND THE COMPANYS CONTROL. SHOULD ONE OR MORE OF THESE RISKS OR UNCERTAINTIES OCCUR, OR SHOULD UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS PROVE TO BE INCORRECT, ACTUAL RESULTS MAY VARY MATERIALLY AND ADVERSELY FROM THOSE ANTICIPATED, BELIEVED, ESTIMATED, OR OTHERWISE INDICATED. CONSEQUENTLY, ALL OF THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS FILING ARE QUALIFIED BY THESE CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS AND THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE OF THE ACTUAL RESULTS OR DEVELOPMENTS.
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and plan of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere herein. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements including information about possible or assumed results of our financial conditions, operations, plans, objectives and performance that involve risk, uncertainties and assumptions. The actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements. For example, when we indicate that we expect to increase our product sales and potentially establish additional license relationships, these are forward-looking statements. The words expect, anticipate, estimate or similar expressions are also used to indicate forward-looking statements. The following discussions should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes thereto presented in Item 1 Financial Statements and our audited financial statements and the related Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 26, 2008.
Background of our Company
Jagged Peak, Inc. (the Company or Jagged Peak) is an e-business software and services company headquartered in Tampa, Florida, providing Demand and Supply Chain management, CRM execution and e-Fulfillment solutions and services. The Companys flagship product, EDGE (E-Business Dynamic Global Engine), is a web-based software application that enables companies to control and coordinate multi-channel orders, catalogs, multi-warehouse inventories, and fulfillment across multiple customers, suppliers, employees, and partners in real-time. The Companys clients are able to build and operate custom branded portals such as e-commerce, incentive and rebate programs, customer service, repair and reverse logistics and automate other business processes through the use of the EDGE application and its related tools. The EDGE platform has been deployed in multiple vertical markets such as consumer goods, financial services, distribution, travel and tourism and manufacturing.
Jagged Peaks multi-channel, enterprise EDGE application provides a comprehensive, integrated platform for e-business management that supports a broad range of business and operational applications. Clients can use EDGE as an enterprise application or as an integrator and consolidator for multiple businesses, processes and applications. EDGE has built in tools to extend the application which enables clients to create complex and robust e-commerce, CRM related customer services and repair and reverse logistics solutions. The EDGE application permits users to manage order capturing, processing, tracking, fulfillment, settlement, creating and managing dynamic catalogs, customer relation management, marketing and reporting, all in real-time application. The EDGE application is built to industry-standard best practices. The application has been integrated seamlessly with legacy and back-office management systems as well as industry leading ERP, WMS, TMS and CRM software systems. In addition to the traditional software license sales model, Jagged Peak offers its software with a flexible managed services transaction based pricing model.
16
Table of Contents
Jagged Peak provides outsourced e-commerce and supply chain solutions that enable manufacturers, distributors, and consumer brand companies the ability to quickly and cost effectively establish and operate a direct to customer online business that is fully integrated with their offline sales channels. Jagged Peaks proven solutions provide companies the tools, expertise, infrastructure and scalability they need to create and maximize their direct to customer sales channel potential without the risk and burden of managing it themselves. The Company uniquely provides companies the benefit of maintaining complete control of the channel, ownership of the customer relationship and retention of the gross product margin normally lost to distributors, resellers and other trading partners.
Jagged Peak recently announced the launch of TotalCommerce, a solution that includes everything a company needs to quickly and cost effectively launch a fully operational, best practices direct to consumer sales channel in less than 60 days. TotalCommerce is an outsourced managed services solution that leverages Jagged Peaks extensive technology and supply chain infrastructure and provides manufacturers with a turnkey, rapidly deployable solution including e-commerce webstore(s); order, inventory and transportation management software; a nationwide network of fulfillment centers; back office program management; and a range of online marketing services.
Jagged Peak has a network of independently owned fulfillment warehouses throughout North America that enables its clients to provide better service to their customers, while lowering their overall delivery costs. The EDGE application is able to automatically route the orders to the optimal warehouse based on an established set of factors such as service, cost and priority. This enables our clients to achieve their customer service goals while reducing cost and internal infrastructure.
In July 2009, Jagged Peak began operations in Canada through its wholly owned subsidiary, Jagged Peak Canada, Inc. The operations provide similar services as in the United States through a network of independently owned fulfillment warehouses, which are managed through technology provided by Jagged Peak, Inc.
There are a variety of risks associated with the Companys ability to achieve strategic objectives, including the ability to increase market penetration, acquire and profitably manage additional businesses, current reliance on key customers, the risks inherent in expanding, and the intense competition in the industry. For a more detailed discussion of these risks, see the section of our December 26, 2008 annual report filed with the SEC under Item 1A entitled Risks Particular to The Companys Business.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For the 13-week period ended September 25, 2009 compared to the 13-week period ended September 26, 2008
Revenues decreased approximately $128,100, or 3%, to approximately $4,097,400 for the 13-week period ended September 25, 2009, as compared to approximately $4,225,500 for the 13-week period ended September 26, 2008. The decrease in revenue primarily related to (i) the decline in the overall economy, (ii) distribution of transactions to network warehouses which lowers overall amounts charged to customers, and (iii) lower revenue from technology services. The newly operating Canadian operation had approximately $348,400 of revenue for the 13-week period ended September 25, 2009.
Costs of revenue, which consist primarily of labor, software amortization, technology, facilities, postage, freight, and packing supplies, increased by approximately $112,500, or 4%, to approximately $3,103,700 for the 13-week period ended September 25, 2009, as compared to approximately $2,991,200 for the 13-week period ended September 26, 2008. As a percentage of revenues, cost of revenue amounted to approximately 76% of related revenues for the 13-week period ended September 25, 2009, as compared with
17
Table of Contents
approximately 71% for the 13-week period ended September 26, 2008. The increase in cost of revenue and the increase as a percentage of revenue resulted primarily from (i) the decrease in revenue due to the decline in the overall economy, (ii) lower technology revenue, (iii) inefficiencies in the initial launch of the Canadian operations, and (iv) the costs related to the establishment of a new network warehouse. The newly operating Canadian operation had approximately $333,700 of cost of revenues for the 13-week period ended September 25, 2009. Management expects the Canadian operation to operate with similar cost of revenue margins as other network locations in 2010.
Selling, general and administrative expense decreased by approximately $55,000, or 5%, to approximately $1,026,700 for the 13-week period ended September 25, 2009 as compared to approximately $1,081,700 for the 13-week period ended September 26, 2008. The decrease was primarily related to (i) elimination of certain administrative costs, (ii) focusing marketing efforts on the core business, and (iii) adjustments in spending budgets to reflect the current revenue pattern. Management will continue to adjust administrative resources to focus on sales and marketing activities to enable the Company to grow without significant increases in general and administrative expenses. The newly operating Canadian operation had approximately $65,300 of administrative costs for the 13-week period ended September 25, 2009. The Canadian operation expensed approximately $61,000 of direct start-up related costs during the period ended September 25, 2009. Management expects administrative costs of the Canadian operation to be significantly less.
The Company realized a loss from continuing operations before provisions for income taxes of approximately $33,000 for the 13-week period ended September 25, 2009, compared with a profit from continuing operations before provisions for income taxes of approximately $152,600 for the 13-week period ended September 26, 2008. The loss from continuing operations primarily resulted from the decreased revenue and the significant start-up costs recognized during the period associated with the Canadian operation.
The income tax benefit was approximately $58,100 for the 13-week period ended September 25, 2009 compared to an income tax expense of approximately $14,300 for the 13-week period ended September 26, 2008. Differences between the effective tax rate used for 2009 and 2008, as compared to the U.S. federal statutory rate and the Canadian statutory rate are primarily due to permanent differences. As of September 25, 2009, the Company had federal and state net operating loss carry-forwards totaling approximately $4,089,600, which begin to expire in 2021.
Basic loss per share from continuing operations for the 13-week period ended September 25, 2009 was $0.01 per weighted average share, compared with basic loss of $0.00 per weighted average share for the 13-week period ended September 26, 2008.
For the 39-week period ended September 25, 2009 compared to the 39-week period ended September 26, 2008
Net revenues decreased approximately $328,900, or 3%, to approximately $11,700,900 for the 39-week period ended September 25, 2009, as compared to approximately $12,029,800 for the 39-week period ended September 26, 2008. The decrease in revenue primarily related to (i) the decline in the overall economy, (ii) distribution of transactions to network warehouses which lowers overall amounts charged to customers, and (iii) lower revenue from technology services. The newly operating Canadian operation had approximately $348,400 of revenue for the 39-week period ended September 25, 2009.
Costs of revenue, which consist primarily of labor, software amortization, technology, facilities, postage, freight, and packing supplies, decreased by approximately $13,500, or less than 1%, to approximately $8,741,600 for the 39-week period ended September 25, 2009, as compared to approximately $8,755,100 for the 39-week period ended September 26, 2008. As a percentage of revenues, cost of sales amounted to approximately 75% of related revenues for the 39-week period ended September 25, 2009, as
18
Table of Contents
compared with approximately 73% for the 39-week period ended September 26, 2008. The decrease in cost of revenue resulted primarily from (i) the decrease in overall revenue, and (ii) the decrease in technology revenue. The newly operating Canadian operation had approximately $333,700 of cost of revenue for the 39-week period ended September 25, 2009. Management expects the Canadian operation to operate with similar cost of revenue margins as other network locations in 2010.
Selling, general and administrative expense increased by approximately $113,300, or 4%, to approximately $3,190,000 for the 39-week period ended September 25, 2009 as compared to approximately $3,076,700 for the 39-week period ended September 26, 2008. The increase was primarily related to (i) increased staffing during the first quarter to support the expected continued growth in revenue, and (ii) increased marketing efforts. Management will continue to adjust administrative resources to focus on sales and marketing activities to enable the Company to grow without significant increases in general and administrative expenses.
The Company realized a loss from continuing operations before provisions for income taxes of approximately $230,700 for the 39-week period ended September 25, 2009, compared with a profit from continuing operations before provisions for income taxes of approximately $198,000 for the 39-week period ended September 26, 2008.
The income tax benefit was approximately $207,700 for the 39-week period ended September 25, 2009 compared to an income tax benefit of approximately $52,100 for the 39-week period ended September 26, 2008. Differences between the effective tax rate used for 2009, and 2008, as compared to the U.S. federal statutory rate and Canadian statutory rate are primarily due to permanent differences. As of September 25, 2009 the Company had federal and state net operating loss carry-forwards totaling approximately $4,089,600, which begin to expire in 2021.
Basic loss per share from continuing operations for the 39-week period ended September 25, 2009 was $0.03 per weighted average share, compared with basic loss of $0.01 per weighted average share for the 39-week period ended September 26, 2008.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Use of Estimates
The Company prepares its financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company reviews its estimates, including but not limited to, capitalization of software, work in process, recoverability of long-lived assets, recoverability of prepaid expenses, valuation on deferred tax assets and allowance for doubtful accounts, on a regular basis and makes adjustments based on historical experiences and existing and expected future conditions. These evaluations are performed and adjustments are made, as information is available. Management believes that these estimates are reasonable and have been discussed with the audit committee; however, actual results could differ from these estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from software license agreements is recognized when an agreement exists, delivery of the software has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability is probable. In software arrangements that include more than one element, the Company allocates the total arrangement fee among the elements based on the relative fair value of each of the elements. Maintenance and support agreement revenues are amortized over the contract period, which is usually one year.
19
Table of Contents
Additional technology revenues are derived from software development services, managed services, transaction fees, and consulting and customized technology assignments. Revenue from technology service arrangements and software development services is recognized as services are provided or on the percentage of completion method for those arrangements with specified milestones. The percentage of completion is based on labor hours incurred to total labor hours expected to be incurred.
Revenue is also derived from fulfillment service arrangements. Services included under fulfillment arrangements include account services, shipping and handling, order processing, packaging, storage and reporting. These services are based on established monthly charges as well as handling fees based on volume. Work in process represents unbilled costs and services. Shipping and handling costs are classified as cost of revenue.
Concentration of Risk
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, are cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivables.
The majority of cash is maintained with a major financial institution in the United States. Deposits with this bank may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand, and, therefore, bear minimal risk.
During the 39-week periods ended September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008, sales to one customer amounted to approximately $8,897,300 and $7,565,900, respectively, or 76% and 63% of total revenues, respectively. Accounts receivable from the same customer at September 25, 2009 amounted to approximately $1,111,000, or approximately 58% of the balance. Accounts receivable from two customers at September 26, 2008 amounted to approximately $772,000 or approximately 41% of the balance. This customer is a large international company with more than one hundred brands and we continue to expand services to additional brands. The Company classifies all business done for all of this customers brands as one single customer for the concentration of risk calculation.
The Company extends credit to its various customers based on evaluation of the customers financial condition and ability to pay the Company in accordance with the payment terms. The Company provides for estimated losses on accounts receivable considering a number of factors, including the overall aging of accounts receivables, customers payment history and the customers current ability to pay its obligation. Based on managements review of accounts receivable and other receivables, an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $240,000 and $230,000 is considered necessary as of September 25, 2009 and December 26, 2008, respectively. Although management believes that accounts receivable are recorded at their net realizable value, a 10% decline in historical collection rate would have increased the current bad debt expense for the period ended September 25, 2009 by approximately $10,000. We do not accrue interest on past due receivables.
Income Taxes
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been reflected in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the book values and the tax bases of particular assets and liabilities and the tax effects of net operating loss and capital loss carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in the tax rate is recognized as income or expense in the period that included the enactment date. Through its reverse acquisition of Absolute Glass, the
20
Table of Contents
Company acquired net operating losses for tax purposes of approximately $2.4 million or a deferred tax asset of approximately $900,000. Internal Revenue Code Sec. 382 places limitations on the utilization of the acquired net operating losses. Due to the possible limitation on taking advantage of these acquired net operating losses, the Company has placed a full valuation allowance against that asset of approximately $900,000.
EBITDA
EBITDA for the 39-week period ended September 25, 2009 was negative by approximately $23,800 compared to positive EBITDA of approximately $407,800 in the comparable period of the prior year. The decrease in the EBITDA directly relates to the increase of selling, general and administrative expenses and decreased revenue. The Company defines EBITDA as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization costs. The Company also excludes the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, discontinued operations, and the impact of restructuring and other charges from the computation, when applicable. The Company believes EBITDA is a useful measure of operating performance before the impact of investing and financing transactions, making comparisons between companies earnings power more meaningful and providing consistent comparisons of the Companys performance. In order to provide consistent comparisons of year-over-year EBITDA, the following reconciliation is provided.
For the 39-weeks ended | ||||||||
September 25, 2009 | September 26, 2008 | |||||||
Net loss as reported |
$ | (371,600 | ) | $ | (144,500 | ) | ||
Income tax benefit |
(207,700 | ) | (52,100 | ) | ||||
Interest expense |
347,400 | 394,600 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
208,100 | 209,800 | ||||||
EBITDA |
$ | (23,800 | ) | $ | 407,800 | |||
USE OF GAAP AND NON-GAAP MEASURES
In addition to results presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), the Company has included in this report earnings EBITDA, with EBITDA being defined by the Company as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The Company also excludes the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, discontinued operations, and the impact of restructuring and other charges from the computation of EBITDA, when applicable. For each non-GAAP financial measure, the Company has presented the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure and has reconciled the non-GAAP financial measure with such comparable GAAP financial measure.
These non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to investors to assist in understanding the underlying operational performance of the Company. Specifically, EBITDA is a useful measure of operating performance before the impact of investing and financing transactions, making comparisons between companies earnings power more meaningful and providing consistent period-over-period comparisons of the Companys performance. In addition, the Company uses these non-GAAP financial measures internally to measure its on-going business performance and in reports to bankers to permit monitoring of the Companys ability to pay outstanding liabilities.
21
Table of Contents
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of September 25, 2009, the Company had approximately $1,984,800 of negative working capital and had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $149,200, compared with approximately $126,500 of cash and cash equivalents at December 26, 2008. The primary reason for the negative working capital is the classification of the note payable as short term, the significant losses in the first and second quarter and the normal seasonality of our sales cycle. In addition, there was significant cash used in the set up of the Canadian operations, which management expects to be able to recover in the fourth quarter. The final payment of the note is due in December of 2009 and management expects to refinance this debt, however because of the pre-payment penalty, management does not believe it is in the best interest of the Company to complete this refinancing early. If management is unable to refinance this debt, the Company will be in default of the loan, however as the Company continues to be cash flow positive from operations, management believes it will be able to structure an arrangement to repay the debt.
During the 39-week period ended September 25, 2009, cash increased by approximately $22,700. This increase in cash was primarily the result of cash generated from operations of approximately $432,300 offset by cash used in investing activities of approximately $398,300 related to investment in new computer equipment and enhancements to the Companys core applications as noted below. In addition, the Company used approximately $70,000 in the set up of the Canadian operations during the third quarter. Management expects to continue to have positive cash flow from operations going forward, except in periods when the accounts receivable and work in process balances significantly increase based on revenue growth. Management has approximately $80,900 on the line of credit available at September 25, 2009 for any short term cash needs.
The Company used approximately $398,300 in cash for investing activities during the 39-week period ended, September 25, 2009. The Company purchased approximately $72,500 of computer and warehouse equipment and invested approximately $325,800 in the development and enhancement of the Companys core applications during the 39-week period ended September 25, 2009. In addition, the Company used approximately $11,300 in financing activities during the 39-week period ended, September 25, 2009.
Management expects that positive cash flow from operations will allow the Company to continue to make the regular monthly payments on the note payable according to the terms of the loan agreement. The Company will need to obtain additional financing to make the final balloon payment of $920,000, due in December of 2009. Management has initiated several meetings with potential investors with some positive results. Based on the cash flow from operations and the Companys past history, management believes the Company will be able to obtain a term sheet for financing with reasonable terms. Management did not start the process of obtaining the additional debt until the fourth quarter, primarily due to the significant prepayment penalty of the current note payable. If the Company is unable to obtain the necessary financing from a conventional bank or other debt investor, it is highly likely that the current shareholders would be significantly diluted if the Company was required to refinance the debt with additional convertible debt at the current market price of the stock. In addition, if the Company is unable to secure the necessary financing, the Company might be required to seek protection under bankruptcy protection laws, which could have a significant impact to current shareholders; however if this occurs management believes that the Company could quickly emerge from bankruptcy, since the business fundamentals are strong and the Company continues to have positive cash flow from operations. Despite the Companys positive cash flow, there can be no assurance that the Company could emerge from bankruptcy given the uncertainties in the financial markets and the world economy.
Our strategy is to continue to expand primarily through internal development, which will depend on a number of factors that are beyond our control. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in implementing our growth strategy or in obtaining adequate financing on favorable terms for these strategies.
22
Table of Contents
From time to time the Company may become a defendant in legal proceedings in the normal course of business. Since the Company has not established a reserve in connection with such claims or any general reserve for legal expenses or claims, any such liability, if at all, would be recorded as an expense in the period incurred or estimated. This amount, even if not material to the Companys overall financial condition, could adversely affect the Companys results of operations in the period recorded.
SEASONALITY
Historically, the Companys revenues and profitability have been subject to moderate quarterly seasonal trends. The first quarter has traditionally been the weakest and the fourth quarter has traditionally been the strongest. Typically, this pattern has been the result of factors such as, national holidays, customer demand and economic conditions. Additionally, significant portions of the Companys revenues are from clients whose business levels are impacted by seasonality and the economy.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
Not Applicable
Item 4(T). Controls and Procedures
(a) | Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the CEO and CFO, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as of September 25, 2009. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective for timely gathering, analyzing, and disclosing the information we are required to disclose in our reports filed under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended. |
(b) | Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There has been no significant change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended September 25, 2009 that materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect the Companys internal control over financial reporting. |
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
As of the date of this Quarterly Report, there are no material pending legal proceedings other than ordinary routine litigation to which the Company is a party or of which any of its property is subject.
Not Applicable.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
There are no unregistered sales of equity securities that have not been previously filed or included in an 8-K report.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
23
Table of Contents
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
During the 39-week period ended September 25, 2009, the Company did not submit any matters to a vote of its security holders.
None.
(a) | Exhibits included herewith are: |
31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer dated November 5, 2009 | |
31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer dated November 5, 2009 | |
32.1 | Written Statements of the Chief Executive Officer dated November 5, 2009 | |
32.2 | Written Statements of the Chief Financial Officer dated November 5, 2009 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
Jagged Peak, Inc. |
||||||
Registrant | ||||||
/s/ Paul B. Demirdjian |
November 5, 2009 |
|||||
Paul B. Demirdjian | Date | |||||
Chief Executive Officer | ||||||
/s/ Andrew J. Norstrud |
November 5, 2009 |
|||||
Andrew J. Norstrud | Date | |||||
Chief Financial Officer |
24