Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-4.3 - EX-4.3 - WASTE SERVICES, INC. | g20929exv4w3.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - WASTE SERVICES, INC. | g20929exv31w1.htm |
EX-10.2 - EX-10.2 - WASTE SERVICES, INC. | g20929exv10w2.htm |
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - WASTE SERVICES, INC. | g20929exv32w1.htm |
EX-10.1 - EX-10.1 - WASTE SERVICES, INC. | g20929exv10w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - WASTE SERVICES, INC. | g20929exv31w2.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2009
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-25955
Waste Services, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 01-0780204 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1122 International Blvd., Suite 601, Burlington, Ontario, Canada L7L 6Z8
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(905) 319-1237
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value, of the registrant outstanding at
October 26, 2009 was 46,253,107.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||||||
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
||||||||
2 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
46 | ||||||||
47 | ||||||||
PART II OTHER INFORMATION |
||||||||
47 | ||||||||
47 | ||||||||
47 | ||||||||
47 | ||||||||
47 | ||||||||
47 | ||||||||
48 | ||||||||
49 | ||||||||
EX-4.3 | ||||||||
EX-10.1 | ||||||||
EX-10.2 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 |
1
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash |
$ | 3,209 | $ | 7,227 | ||||
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $639
and $631 as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively) |
57,585 | 52,062 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
9,754 | 13,672 | ||||||
Total current
assets |
70,548 | 72,961 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
199,540 | 188,800 | ||||||
Landfill sites, net |
196,349 | 196,632 | ||||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net |
393,514 | 372,886 | ||||||
Other assets |
10,841 | 9,648 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 870,792 | $ | 840,927 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 24,100 | $ | 19,341 | ||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
57,220 | 62,802 | ||||||
Short-term financing and current portion of long-term debt |
17,750 | 11,102 | ||||||
Total current
liabilities |
99,070 | 93,245 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
355,529 | 360,967 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
38,100 | 32,298 | ||||||
Accrued closure, post-closure and other obligations |
21,361 | 19,399 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
514,060 | 505,909 | ||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock $0.01 par value: 166,666,666 shares authorized, 46,253,107
and 43,985,436 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively |
462 | 439 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
501,200 | 512,942 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
46,102 | 38,221 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(191,032 | ) | (216,584 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders equity |
356,732 | 335,018 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 870,792 | $ | 840,927 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 112,461 | $ | 125,745 | $ | 315,738 | $ | 370,635 | ||||||||
Operating and other expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of operations (exclusive of depreciation, depletion
and amortization) |
71,204 | 82,512 | 203,896 | 242,661 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense (exclusive of
depreciation, depletion and amortization) |
13,085 | 15,074 | 39,034 | 47,943 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
10,940 | 11,503 | 32,016 | 34,826 | ||||||||||||
Loss (gain) on sale of property and equipment, foreign exchange and
other |
(7 | ) | 135 | (2,533 | ) | (322 | ) | |||||||||
Income from operations |
17,239 | 16,521 | 43,325 | 45,527 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
7,528 | 7,730 | 22,418 | 25,770 | ||||||||||||
Change in fair value of warrants |
(688 | ) | | (2,103 | ) | | ||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
10,399 | 8,791 | 23,010 | 19,757 | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
3,682 | 5,322 | 8,837 | 6,927 | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
6,717 | 3,469 | 14,173 | 12,830 | ||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of income tax
provision of $266 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
| | | 409 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of income tax
provision of $4,485 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
| | | 6,869 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 6,717 | $ | 3,469 | $ | 14,173 | $ | 20,108 | ||||||||
Basic and diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Earnings per share continuing operations |
$ | 0.15 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.28 | ||||||||
Earnings per share discontinued operations |
| | | 0.16 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per share basic and diluted |
$ | 0.15 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.44 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
46,253 | 46,079 | 46,206 | 46,076 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
46,302 | 46,088 | 46,231 | 46,085 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
(In thousands)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Waste Services, Inc. | Additional | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Paid-in | Comprehensive | Accumulated | Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Income | Deficit | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2008, as previously
reported |
43,985 | $ | 439 | $ | 512,942 | $ | 38,221 | $ | (216,584 | ) | $ | 335,018 | ||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of reclassification of warrants |
| | (13,774 | ) | | 11,379 | (2,395 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 1, 2009, as adjusted |
43,985 | 439 | 499,168 | 38,221 | (205,205 | ) | 332,623 | |||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
172 | 2 | 2,053 | | | 2,055 | ||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of exchangeable shares |
2,096 | 21 | (21 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
| | | 7,881 | | 7,881 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | 14,173 | 14,173 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2009 |
46,253 | $ | 462 | $ | 501,200 | $ | 46,102 | $ | (191,032 | ) | $ | 356,732 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 14,173 | $ | 20,108 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows
from operating activities: |
||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of income tax |
| (7,278 | ) | |||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
32,016 | 34,826 | ||||||
Amortization of debt issue costs and discounts |
2,593 | 2,008 | ||||||
Deferred income tax provision (benefit) |
3,862 | (1,724 | ) | |||||
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense |
2,055 | 2,785 | ||||||
Change in fair value of warrants |
(2,103 | ) | | |||||
Loss (gain) on sale of property and equipment and other non-cash items
|
(1,834 | ) | 229 | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities (excluding
the effects of acquisitions and dispositions): |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(731 | ) | 2,461 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
5,826 | 2,851 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
3,074 | (3,537 | ) | |||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
(11,777 | ) | (3,806 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by continuing operations |
47,154 | 48,923 | ||||||
Net cash provided by discontinued operations |
| 1,163 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
47,154 | 50,086 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Cash used in business combinations |
(16,681 | ) | | |||||
Capital expenditures |
(24,413 | ) | (39,220 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from asset sales and business divestitures |
6,862 | 57,715 | ||||||
Deposits for business acquisitions and other |
(529 | ) | (3,876 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations |
(34,761 | ) | 14,619 | |||||
Net cash used in discontinued operations |
| (43 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
(34,761 | ) | 14,576 | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from Senior Subordinated Notes |
51,563 | | ||||||
Draws on revolving credit facility |
34,419 | | ||||||
Proceeds from the exercise of options and warrants |
| 60 | ||||||
Principal repayments of debt and capital lease obligations |
(102,681 | ) | (43,597 | ) | ||||
Fees paid for financing transactions |
(1,204 | ) | | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities continuing operations |
(17,903 | ) | (43,537 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
1,492 | (836 | ) | |||||
Increase (decrease) in cash |
(4,018 | ) | 20,289 | |||||
Cash at the beginning of the period |
7,227 | 20,706 | ||||||
Cash at the end of the period |
$ | 3,209 | $ | 40,995 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Organization of Business and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of
Waste Services, Inc. (Waste Services) and its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, we,
us, or our). We are a multi-regional, integrated solid waste services company, providing
collection, transfer, landfill disposal and recycling services for commercial, industrial and
residential customers. Our operating strategy is disposal-based, whereby we enter geographic
markets with attractive growth or positive competitive characteristics by acquiring and developing
landfill disposal capacity, then acquiring and developing waste collection and transfer operations.
Our operations are located in the United States and Canada. Our U.S. operations are located in
Florida and our Canadian operations are located in Eastern Canada (Ontario) and Western Canada
(Alberta, Saskatchewan and British Columbia). We divested our Jacksonville, Florida operations in
March 2008 and as a result, these operations are presented as discontinued for all periods
presented.
These Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared pursuant to the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). All significant
intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated. All figures are presented in thousands
of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data, or except where expressly stated as being in
Canadian dollars (C$) or in millions. Certain information related to our organization,
significant accounting policies and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP)
has been condensed or omitted. The accounting policies followed in the preparation of these
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are consistent with those followed in our
annual consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed on Form
10-K. In the opinion of management, these Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
contain all material adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to
fairly state our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented
and the presentations and disclosures herein are adequate when read in conjunction with our Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Income taxes during these interim periods have been
provided based on our anticipated annual effective income tax rate for each respective tax
jurisdiction. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period financial statement
amounts to conform to the current presentation. We evaluated subsequent events through the date the
accompanying financial statements were issued, which was October 29, 2009. Due to the seasonal
nature of our business, operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the
results for full years.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. Significant estimates include the allowance for doubtful accounts, depletion of landfill
development costs, carrying amounts of goodwill and other intangible assets, liabilities for
landfill capping, closure and post-closure obligations, insurance reserves, restructuring reserves,
revenue recognition, liabilities for potential litigation, valuation assumptions for share-based
payments and warrants, carrying amounts of long-lived assets and deferred taxes.
A portion of our operations is domiciled in Canada. For each reporting period we translate the
results of operations and financial condition of our Canadian operations into U.S. dollars.
Therefore, the reported results of our operations and financial condition are subject to changes in
the exchange relationship between the two currencies. For example, as the Canadian dollar
strengthens against the U.S. dollar, revenue is favorably affected and conversely expenses are
unfavorably affected. Assets and liabilities of our Canadian operations are translated from
Canadian dollars into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the relevant balance sheet
dates, and revenue and expenses of our Canadian operations are translated from Canadian dollars
into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rates prevailing during the period. Unrealized gains and
losses on translation of our Canadian operations into U.S. dollars are reported as a separate
component of shareholders equity and are included in comprehensive income or loss. Monetary assets
and liabilities are re-measured from U.S. dollars into Canadian dollars and then translated into
U.S. dollars. The effects of re-measurement are reported currently as a component of net income.
Currently, we do not hedge our exposure to changes in foreign exchange rates.
6
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding for the period, including exchangeable shares of Waste Services (CA)
Inc. not owned by us. Diluted earnings per share is calculated based on the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding for the period, including the exchangeable shares, plus the
dilutive effect of common stock purchase warrants, stock options and restricted stock units using
the treasury stock method. Contingently issuable shares will be included in the calculation of
basic earnings per share when all contingencies surrounding the issuance of the shares are met and
the shares are issued or issuable. Contingently issuable shares are included in the calculation of
dilutive earnings per share as of the beginning of the reporting period if, at the end of the
reporting period, all contingencies surrounding the issuance of the shares are satisfied or would
be satisfied if the end of the reporting period were the end of the contingency period.
For purposes of computing net income per common share, the basic and diluted weighted average
number of common shares outstanding for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 includes the
effect of 2,414,932 exchangeable shares of Waste Services (CA) Inc. (exchangeable for 804,977
shares of our common stock), as if they were shares of our outstanding common stock, and for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 includes the effect of 6,288,637 and 6,299,102
exchangeable shares of Waste Services (CA) Inc., respectively (exchangeable for 2,096,212 and
2,099,700 shares of our common stock, respectively), as if they were shares of our outstanding
common stock. During the second quarter of 2009, all remaining exchangeable shares of Waste
Services (CA) Inc. not owned by affiliates were exchanged for shares of our common stock and
accordingly, no exchangeable shares of Waste Services (CA) Inc. were included in basic and diluted
weighted average common shares outstanding for the three months ended September 30, 2009.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, stock options and common stock
purchase warrants for the purchase of 3,659,011 common shares were antidilutive as the exercise
price of such options and warrants was in excess of the average market price for our common stock
for such periods. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, stock options and common
stock purchase warrants for the purchase of 6,040,490 common shares were antidilutive as the
exercise price of such options and warrants was in excess of the average market price for our
common stock for such periods.
2. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements and Adopted Accounting
In August 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update No. 2009-5, Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value (ASU 2009-05). ASU 2009-05 amends
Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. Specifically, ASU 2009-5
provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the
identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using
one or more of the following methods: (i) a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the
identical liability when traded as an asset or quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar
liabilities when traded as assets and/or (ii) a valuation technique that is consistent with the
principles of Topic 820 of the Accounting Standards Codification (e.g. an income approach or market
approach). ASU 2009-05 also clarifies that (i) when estimating the fair value of a liability, a
reporting entity is not required to adjust to include inputs relating to the existence of transfer
restrictions on that liability and (ii) that both a quoted price in an active market for an
identical liability at the measurement date and a quoted price for the identical liability when
traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are
required are level one fair value measurements. ASU 2009-05 is effective for financial statements
issued for interim and annual periods beginning after August 28, 2009. We do not anticipate that
the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our financial position and results of
operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance for determining whether an entity is a variable
interest entity (VIE). This guidance requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine
whether the enterprises variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in
a VIE. Under this guidance, an enterprise has a controlling financial interest when it has (i) the
power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entitys economic
performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits
from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Enterprises are also required to
assess whether they have an implicit financial responsibility to ensure that a VIE operates as
designed when determining whether it has power to direct the activities of the VIE that most
significantly impact the entitys economic performance. This guidance also requires ongoing
assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, requires enhanced
disclosures and eliminates the scope exclusion for qualifying special-purpose entities. This
guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009. We do not
anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our financial position
and results of operations.
7
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance that seeks to improve the relevance and comparability
of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of
financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows; and a transferors continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets.
Specifically, this guidance eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, creates
more stringent conditions for reporting a transfer of a portion of a financial asset as a sale,
clarifies other sale-accounting criteria, and changes the initial measurement of a transferors
interest in transferred financial assets. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods
beginning after November 15, 2009. We do not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will
have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations.
Effective January 1, 2009 we adopted guidance related to determining whether an instrument or
embedded feature is indexed to an entitys own stock. This guidance applies to any freestanding
financial instruments or embedded features that have the characteristics of a derivative and to any
freestanding financial instruments that are potentially settled in an entitys own common stock.
As a result of adopting this accounting guidance, outstanding common stock purchase warrants to
purchase 2,383,333 common shares that were previously treated as equity pursuant to the derivative
treatment exemption, were no longer afforded equity treatment. These warrants have an exercise
price of $9.00 per share and expire in May 2010. As such, effective January 1, 2009 we
reclassified the fair value of these common stock purchase warrants, which have exercise price
reset features, from equity to liability status as if these warrants were treated as a derivative
liability since their date of issue in May 2003. On January 1, 2009, we reclassified from
additional paid-in capital to beginning accumulated deficit $11.4 million, as a cumulative effect
adjustment, and $2.4 million to a long-term warrant liability to recognize the fair value of these
warrants on such date. The fair value of these common stock purchase warrants declined to $0.3
million as of September 30, 2009. We recognized a gain of $0.7 million and $2.1 million from the
change in the fair value of these warrants for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively.
These common stock purchase warrants were initially issued in connection with our May 2003
issuance of 55,000 shares of redeemable preferred stock, which were subsequently exchanged and/or
redeemed in December 2006. The common stock purchase warrants were not issued with the intent of
effectively hedging any future cash flow, fair value of any asset, liability or any net investment
in a foreign operation. The warrants do not qualify for hedge accounting, and as such, all future
changes in the fair value of these warrants will be recognized currently in earnings until such
time as the warrants are exercised or expire.
These common stock purchase warrants do not trade in an active securities market, and as such,
we estimate the fair value of these warrants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the
following assumptions:
September 30, | January 1, | |||||||
2009 | 2009 | |||||||
Annual dividend
yield |
| | ||||||
Expected life (years) |
0.6 | 1.4 | ||||||
Risk-free interest
rate |
0.4 | % | 0.4 | % | ||||
Expected
volatility |
63 | % | 56 | % |
Expected volatility is based primarily on historical volatility. Historical volatility was
computed using daily pricing observations for recent periods that correspond to the last twelve
months. We believe this method produces an estimate that is representative of our expectations of
future volatility over the expected term of these warrants. We currently have no reason to believe
future volatility over the expected remaining life of these warrants is likely to differ materially
from historical volatility. The expected life is based on the remaining term of the warrants. The
risk-free interest rate is based on one-year U.S. Treasury securities.
8
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In December 2007, the FASB issued revised guidance for accounting for business combinations,
which established the principles and requirements for how an acquirer (i) recognizes and measures
in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; (ii) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the
business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and (iii) determines what information to
disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects
of the business combination. Previously, any changes in valuation allowances as a result of income
from acquisitions for certain deferred tax assets would serve to reduce goodwill. Under this
revised guidance, any changes in the valuation allowance related to income from acquisitions
currently or in prior periods now serves to reduce income taxes in the period in which the reserve
is reversed. Additionally, transaction related expenses that were previously capitalized are now
expensed as incurred. As of December 31, 2008, we had no deferred transaction related expenses for
business combination transactions in negotiation. The provisions of this revised guidance apply
prospectively to business combinations consummated on or after January 1, 2009 and we had no
transition adjustments on January 1, 2009.
3. Fair Value Measurements
The book values of cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their respective
fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The fair value of the term loan
facilities under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities and our 91/2% Senior Subordinated Notes at
September 30, 2009 is estimated at $145.1 million and $209.0 million, respectively, based on quoted
market prices. The fair value hierarchy under GAAP distinguishes between assumptions based on
market data (observable inputs) and an entitys own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The
hierarchy consists of three levels:
| Level one Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; | ||
| Level two Inputs other than level one inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable; and | ||
| Level three Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions, which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions that a market participant would use. |
Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires
significant judgment. We evaluate our hierarchy disclosures each quarter. Liabilities measured at
fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows as of September 30, 2009 (unaudited):
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Accrued closure and post-closure obligations |
$ | | $ | | $ | 19,856 | $ | 19,856 | ||||||||
Accrued rent relative to October 2008 restructuring |
| | 625 | 625 | ||||||||||||
Fair value of warrants |
| 293 | | 293 | ||||||||||||
$ | | $ | 293 | $ | 20,481 | $ | 20,774 | |||||||||
A discussion of the valuation techniques used to measure fair value for the liabilities listed
above and activity for these liabilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is provided
elsewhere in Notes 2, 9 and 14. We have no assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring
basis. There were no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 other than those acquired in business combinations, which
are discussed in Note 5.
4. Share-Based Payments
We have one active share-based stock award plan that provides for the grant of stock options
and stock awards, such as restricted stock units, to our employees and members of our Board of
Directors, as approved by our Board of Directors. Under this plan, the maximum number of shares
that will be available for award will not exceed 4,500,000 shares of our common stock. As of
September 30, 2009, there were 2,767,417 shares available for grant under the plan.
9
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock-based compensation expense was $0.3 million and $0.8 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $2.1 million and $2.8 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. During 2008, we granted 742,500 restricted stock
units (RSUs) to certain employees and directors, which are eligible to vest in three equal
tranches over each of the next three years following the grant, and are contingent on the
achievement of specific annual performance criteria. During 2008, 55,000 of these RSUs were
forfeited. The aggregate fair value of the first tranche of restricted stock units is
approximately $2.2 million, or $9.02 per unit, of which a total of $1.6 million has been expensed
based on the achievement of specific performance criteria for 2008. We recognized $0.7 million of
this expense in the first quarter of 2009. A total of 171,875 shares with an aggregate fair value
of $0.7 million vested in the first quarter of 2009. Performance criteria for the second tranche
of the 2008 grant were set in the first quarter of 2009 and resulted in an aggregate fair value for
the second tranche of $1.1 million, or $4.76 per unit, which is being expensed based on our
estimate of achieving the specific performance criteria for 2009 on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period. We expect performance criteria for the third tranche of this grant to be
specified in the first quarter of 2010.
In the first quarter of 2009, we granted 628,500 RSUs to certain employees and directors,
which are eligible to vest in three equal tranches over each of the next three years following the
grant, and are also contingent on the achievement of specific annual performance criteria. The fair
value of the first tranche of RSUs of approximately $0.9 million, or $4.33 per unit, is being
expensed based on our estimate of achieving the specific performance criteria for 2009 on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period. We expect performance criteria for the
second and third tranches of this grant to be specified during the year in which they are eligible
to vest.
Activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 for our RSUs for which performance
based vesting criteria have been specified is as follows (aggregate intrinsic value in thousands):
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | |||||||||||||||
Average | Remaining | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Number | Grant | Contractual | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||
of Shares | Value | Term (Years) | Value | |||||||||||||
Nonvested restricted stock units - |
||||||||||||||||
Beginning of the period |
229,158 | $ | 9.02 | 0.3 | $ | 1,508 | ||||||||||
Granted |
438,669 | 4.55 | ||||||||||||||
Vested |
(171,875 | ) | 9.02 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited |
(3,751 | ) | 5.04 | |||||||||||||
End of the period |
492,201 | 5.07 | 0.5 | $ | 2,274 | |||||||||||
As of September 30, 2009, 643,161 RSUs have been excluded from the above table as the
performance based vesting criteria for these RSUs had not yet been set at that time.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we granted options to purchase 282,500 shares
of our common stock to certain employees. These options have an exercise price of $4.33 per share,
a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $2.40 per share and vest one-third over each of the
next three years following the grant. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we granted
options to purchase 233,500 shares of our common stock to certain employees. These options have an
exercise price of $9.50 per share, a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $5.55 per share and
vest one-third over each of next three years following the grant. The fair value of options granted
is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions:
Three Months | ||||||||||||
Ended | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||
September 30, 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Annual dividend
yield |
| | | |||||||||
Weighted average expected life
(years) |
6.7 | 7.0 | 7.0 | |||||||||
Risk-free interest
rate |
3.8 | % | 2.6 | % | 3.2 | % | ||||||
Expected
volatility |
53 | % | 52 | % | 61 | % |
10
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expected volatility is based primarily on historical volatility. Historical volatility was
computed using daily pricing observations for recent periods that correspond to the expected life
of the grant. We believe this method produces an estimate that is representative of our
expectations of future volatility over the expected term of our options. We currently have no
reason to believe future volatility over the expected life of these options is likely to differ
materially from historical volatility. The weighted-average expected life is based on share option
exercises, pre and post vesting terminations and share option term expiration. The risk-free
interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury security rate for the expected life of the options at
the date of grant.
We estimate forfeitures when recognizing compensation expense and adjust this estimate over
the requisite service period should actual forfeitures differ from such estimates. Changes in
estimated forfeitures are recognized through a cumulative adjustment, which is recognized in the
period of change and which impacts the amount of unamortized compensation expense to be recognized
in future periods.
Stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 for employee options
covered by our stock option plans is as follows (unaudited):
Number of | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |||||||||||
Shares Issuable | US$ Options | C$ Options (C$) | ||||||||||
Options outstanding at the beginning of the period |
2,218,965 | $ | 12.29 | $ | 20.41 | |||||||
Granted |
282,500 | 4.33 | | |||||||||
Forfeited |
(45,667 | ) | 8.45 | | ||||||||
Expired |
(1,328,982 | ) | 14.19 | 20.41 | ||||||||
Options outstanding at the end of the period |
1,126,816 | 8.59 | | |||||||||
Options vested or expected to vest at the end of the period |
1,029,351 | 8.85 | | |||||||||
Options exercisable at the end of the period |
752,947 | 10.00 | | |||||||||
The intrinsic value of options outstanding at September 30, 2009 was $0.1 million. As of
September 30, 2009, $0.8 million and $0.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to employee stock options and RSUs is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
approximately 2.0 years and 0.5 years, respectively.
5. Business Combinations
We believe the primary value of an acquisition is the opportunity made available to vertically
integrate operations or increase market presence within a geographic market. We expect goodwill
generated from the acquisitions described below to be deductible for income tax purposes.
In September 2009, we acquired the Miami-Dade County, Florida hauling operations of DisposAll
of South Florida, Inc. (DisposAll) for approximately $15.6 million, of which $1.3 million was
paid by way of a disposal credit for future fees charged to DisposAll for waste disposed at certain
of our transfer station and landfill facilities. We intend to internalize the waste flow from this
acquisition into our existing transfer station and landfill facilities.
During the first nine months of 2009, we also acquired four separate tuck-in hauling
operations in southwest Florida for an aggregate purchase price of $2.6 million. We are
internalizing construction and demolition waste volumes associated with these acquisitions into
certain of our existing transfer station and landfill facilities.
11
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Details of the net assets acquired and the purchase price paid for acquisitions that occurred
during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 are as follows:
DisposAll | All Others | Total | ||||||||||
Purchase price: |
||||||||||||
Cash paid |
$ | 14,313 | $ | 2,368 | $ | 16,681 | ||||||
Deferred purchase price |
| 168 | 168 | |||||||||
Other consideration |
1,250 | 54 | 1,304 | |||||||||
Total purchase price |
$ | 15,563 | $ | 2,590 | $ | 18,153 | ||||||
Allocated as follows: |
||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
$ | 629 | $ | 21 | $ | 650 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
(677 | ) | | (677 | ) | |||||||
Property and equipment |
3,634 | 1,332 | 4,966 | |||||||||
Other intangible assets |
4,163 | 673 | 4,836 | |||||||||
Fair value of assets acquired |
$ | 7,749 | $ | 2,026 | $ | 9,775 | ||||||
Goodwill allocation |
$ | 7,814 | $ | 564 | $ | 8,378 | ||||||
The amounts allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the above table were
determined using level three inputs and are complete with the exception of certain property and
equipment acquired and liabilities assumed in the DisposAll transaction, for which we have made a
preliminary estimate of fair value. Fair value for property and equipment was based on other
observable transactions for similar property and equipment. Accounts receivable in the above table
primarily relates to the DisposAll acquisition and represents our best estimate of balances that
will ultimately be collected, which is based in part on our allowance for doubtful accounts reserve
criteria and an evaluation of the specific receivable balances. These receivables have a gross
contractual balance due of $0.8 million. The weighted-average amortization period for other
intangible assets in the above table is as follows:
Weighted - | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Amortization | ||||||||
Amount | Period | |||||||
Allocated | (Years) | |||||||
Customer relationships and
contracts |
$ | 3,706 | 3.0 | |||||
Non-competition agreements |
1,130 | 5.0 | ||||||
Total other intangible assets
acquired |
$ | 4,836 | 3.4 | |||||
Fair value for customer relationships and contracts is based on a discounted cash flow model
that discounts the earnings attributable to acquired customers and considers attrition factors
based on historically observed attrition rates in a particular market. Fair value for
non-competition agreements is based on a discounted cash flow model that compares the present value
of cash flows with and without the non-competition agreement in place, with the fair value of the
agreement equal to the difference between the two scenarios.
Acquisitions completed during 2009 primarily relate to hauling operations that have been
integrated into our Florida reporting unit. We have internalized the majority of waste volumes
associated with these acquisitions into our existing transfer station and landfill facilities.
Accordingly, we believe it to be impracticable to determine the amount of earnings related to these
acquisitions that are included in our consolidated income statement. Revenue from these
acquisitions, included in our consolidated revenue, was $1.1 million and $2.3 million for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
In December 2008, we acquired RIP, Inc., the owner of a construction and demolition waste
landfill in Citrus Country, Florida, for an aggregate purchase price of $7.7 million. Should the
site be permitted as a Class I landfill, Class III landfill, transfer station or a construction and
demolition operation, the sellers are entitled to future royalties at varied rates per ton based on
the volume and type of waste deposited at the site.
12
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In December 2008, we acquired the assets of Commercial Clean-up Enterprises, Inc. and We Haul
of South Florida, Inc., collectively a construction and demolition hauling operation in Fort Myers
and Naples, Florida, for a total purchase price of $6.1 million, of which $1.6 million is deferred
and is being paid as we collect waste volumes from within the counties of Charlotte, Lee and
Collier, Florida. We are internalizing the waste volumes associated with this acquisition to our
SLD Landfill in southwest Florida.
The following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of our operations for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 as if acquisitions completed prior to September 30,
2009 had occurred as of January 1, 2009 (in thousands except per share amounts):
Three Months | Nine Months | |||||||
Ended | Ended | |||||||
September 30, 2009 | September 30, 2009 | |||||||
Revenue |
$ | 113,699 | $ | 321,615 | ||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 6,451 | $ | 13,036 | ||||
Basic and diluted earnings per share continuing operations |
$ | 0.14 | $ | 0.28 | ||||
Pro forma weighted average number of common shares outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
46,253 | 46,206 | ||||||
Diluted |
46,302 | 46,231 | ||||||
The following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of our operations for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 as if acquisitions completed prior to September 30,
2009 and in 2008 had occurred as of January 1, 2008 (in thousands except per share amounts):
Three Months | Nine Months | |||||||
Ended | Ended | |||||||
September 30, 2008 | September 30, 2008 | |||||||
Revenue |
$ | 129,481 | $ | 381,843 | ||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 2,504 | $ | 9,740 | ||||
Basic and diluted earnings per share continuing operations |
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.21 | ||||
Pro forma weighted average number of common shares outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
46,079 | 46,076 | ||||||
Diluted |
46,088 | 46,085 | ||||||
These unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated results have been prepared for comparative
purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations had the
acquisitions taken place as of the beginning of 2009 or 2008, or of the results of our future
operations. Furthermore, the pro forma results do not give effect to all cost savings or
incremental costs that may occur as a result of the integration and consolidation of these
acquisitions.
In October 2009, we acquired Republic Services operations in Miami-Dade County, Florida for
$32.0 million in cash plus an adjustment for working capital. We intend to internalize the waste
flow from this acquisition into our existing transfer station and
landfill facilities. In October 2009, we also acquired a tuck-in hauling operation in the
Tampa, Florida area for an aggregate purchase price of $1.1 million. As of the date of this filing,
the purchase price allocation for these two acquisitions has not yet been completed.
13
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
6. Discontinued Operations
In March 2008, we sold our hauling and material recovery operations and a construction and
demolition landfill site in the Jacksonville, Florida market to an independent third party. The
proceeds from this sale approximated $56.7 million in cash, including working capital. At the time
of close, we were actively pursuing an expansion at the landfill. If the construction and
demolition landfill site did not obtain certain permits relating to an expansion, we would have
been required to refund $10.0 million of the purchase price and receive title to the expansion
property. Accordingly, at the time of closing we deferred this portion of the proceeds, net of our
$3.0 million cost basis. During December 2008, the permits relating to the expansion were secured
and the deferred gain was recognized. Simultaneously with the closing of the sale transaction we
entered into an operating lease with the buyer for certain land and buildings used in the
Jacksonville, Florida operations, for a term of five years at $0.5 million per year. The lessee had
the option to purchase the leased assets for a purchase price of $6.0 million, which it exercised
in March 2009 resulting in a gain on sale of $3.3 million, which is reflected in Gain on sale of
property and equipment, foreign exchange and other on the accompanying Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The proceeds
from the sale of the leased assets were utilized to repay amounts under the revolver portion of our
Credit Facilities. At the time of close in March 2008, we utilized $42.5 million of the proceeds
to make a prepayment of the term loan under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities. Accordingly, we
expensed approximately $0.5 million of unamortized debt issue costs relating to this retirement.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, we recognized a pre-tax gain on disposal of $18.4 million
($11.1 million net of tax) relative to the sale of the Jacksonville, Florida operations, of which
$11.4 million ($6.9 million net of tax) was realized during the first nine months of 2008. Included
in the calculation of the gain on disposal for the Jacksonville, Florida operations was
approximately $23.6 million of goodwill. Subsequent to the disposal of the Jacksonville, Florida
operations, we adjusted the pre-tax gain on disposal for the settlement of working capital of
approximately $0.2 million.
We have presented the net assets and operations of our Jacksonville, Florida operations, as
discontinued operations for all periods presented. Revenue from discontinued operations was nil and
$4.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and pre-tax
income from discontinued operations was nil and $0.7 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively. The transaction to dispose of the Jacksonville, Florida
operations was completed in 2008 and accordingly, these operations do not impact our 2009 results.
7. Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses |
$ | 4,659 | $ | 9,793 | ||||
Parts and supplies |
1,928 | 1,733 | ||||||
Income taxes
receivable |
1,040 | 563 | ||||||
Other current assets |
2,127 | 1,583 | ||||||
$ | 9,754 | $ | 13,672 | |||||
14
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
8. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Land and buildings |
$ | 82,005 | $ | 74,497 | ||||
Vehicles |
155,518 | 141,650 | ||||||
Containers, compactors and landfill and recycling equipment |
104,472 | 89,568 | ||||||
Furniture, fixtures, other office equipment and leasehold improvements |
13,025 | 11,060 | ||||||
Total property and equipment |
355,020 | 316,775 | ||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
(155,480 | ) | (127,975 | ) | ||||
Property and equipment, net |
$ | 199,540 | $ | 188,800 | ||||
9. Landfill Sites, Accrued Closure, Post-Closure and Other Obligations
Landfill Sites
Landfill sites consist of the following:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Landfill sites |
$ | 273,565 | $ | 262,732 | ||||
Less: Accumulated depletion |
(77,216 | ) | (66,100 | ) | ||||
Landfill sites, net |
$ | 196,349 | $ | 196,632 | ||||
The changes in landfill sites for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as
follows (unaudited):
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Balance at the beginning of the period |
$ | 196,632 | $ | 190,451 | ||||
Landfill site construction costs |
3,545 | 7,289 | ||||||
Additional asset retirement obligations |
1,023 | 1,284 | ||||||
Depletion |
(6,934 | ) | (7,784 | ) | ||||
Purchase price adjustments for prior acquisitions |
9 | 49 | ||||||
Effect of foreign exchange rate fluctuations |
2,074 | (1,181 | ) | |||||
Balance at the end of the period |
$ | 196,349 | $ | 190,108 | ||||
15
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accrued Closure, Post-Closure and Other Obligations
Accrued closure, post-closure and other obligations consist of the following:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Accrued closure and post-closure obligations |
$ | 16,050 | $ | 12,749 | ||||
Accrued restructuring and severance costs |
2,068 | 3,624 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations |
3 | 568 | ||||||
Other obligations |
3,240 | 2,458 | ||||||
$ | 21,361 | $ | 19,399 | |||||
Accrued closure and post-closure obligations include costs associated with obligations for
closure and post-closure of our landfills. Landfill closure and post-closure liabilities are
calculated by estimating the total obligation of capping and closure events in current dollars,
inflating the obligation based on the expected date of the expenditure using an inflation rate of
approximately 2.5% and discounting the inflated total to its present value using a credit-adjusted
risk-free discount rate of approximately 6.5%. The anticipated timeframe for paying these costs
varies based on the remaining useful life of each landfill as well as the duration of the
post-closure monitoring period. Accretion of discounted cash flows associated with the closure and
post closure obligations is accrued over the life of the landfill, as a charge to cost of
operations.
The changes in accrued closure and post-closure obligations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows (unaudited):
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Current portion at the beginning of the period |
$ | 7,589 | $ | 4,153 | ||||
Long-term portion at the beginning of the period |
12,749 | 14,678 | ||||||
Balance at the beginning of the period |
20,338 | 18,831 | ||||||
Additional asset retirement obligations |
1,023 | 1,284 | ||||||
Accretion |
477 | 589 | ||||||
Payments |
(3,452 | ) | (304 | ) | ||||
Acquisitions |
250 | | ||||||
Other additions |
150 | | ||||||
Effect of foreign exchange rate fluctuations |
1,070 | (627 | ) | |||||
Balance at the end of the period |
19,856 | 19,773 | ||||||
Less: Current portion |
(3,806 | ) | (5,902 | ) | ||||
Long-term portion |
$ | 16,050 | $ | 13,871 | ||||
16
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
10. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and other intangible assets consist of the following:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Other intangible assets subject to amortization: |
||||||||
Customer relationships and contracts |
$ | 52,725 | $ | 48,997 | ||||
Non-competition agreements and other |
6,845 | 5,629 | ||||||
59,570 | 54,626 | |||||||
Less: Accumulated amortization: |
||||||||
Customer relationships and contracts |
(29,735 | ) | (26,536 | ) | ||||
Non-competition agreements and other |
(3,122 | ) | (2,133 | ) | ||||
Other intangible assets subject to amortization, net |
26,713 | 25,957 | ||||||
Goodwill |
366,801 | 346,929 | ||||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net |
$ | 393,514 | $ | 372,886 | ||||
The changes in goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows
(unaudited):
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||
Florida | Canada | Total | ||||||||||
Balance at the beginning of the period |
$ | 263,428 | $ | 83,501 | $ | 346,929 | ||||||
Acquisitions |
8,378 | | 8,378 | |||||||||
Effect of foreign exchange rate fluctuations |
| 11,494 | 11,494 | |||||||||
Balance at the end of the period |
$ | 271,806 | $ | 94,995 | $ | 366,801 | ||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||
Florida | Canada | Total | ||||||||||
Balance at the beginning of the period |
$ | 262,338 | $ | 102,603 | $ | 364,941 | ||||||
Purchase price allocation adjustments for prior acquisitions |
(104 | ) | | (104 | ) | |||||||
Effect of foreign exchange rate fluctuations |
| (7,029 | ) | (7,029 | ) | |||||||
Balance at the end of the period |
$ | 262,234 | $ | 95,574 | $ | 357,808 | ||||||
11. Other Assets
Other assets consist of the following:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Debt issue costs, net of accumulated amortization of $4,485 and $3,035
as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively |
$ | 9,188 | $ | 8,538 | ||||
Acquisition deposits |
1,129 | 561 | ||||||
Other assets |
524 | 549 | ||||||
$ | 10,841 | $ | 9,648 | |||||
17
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
12. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Deferred revenue |
$ | 11,900 | $ | 10,980 | ||||
Accrued interest |
9,873 | 3,702 | ||||||
Accrued compensation, benefits and subcontractor costs |
6,635 | 7,893 | ||||||
Insurance reserves |
6,443 | 6,505 | ||||||
Accrued waste disposal costs |
5,930 | 7,964 | ||||||
Accrued closure and post-closure obligations |
3,806 | 7,589 | ||||||
Accrued restructuring and severance costs |
2,042 | 3,183 | ||||||
Accrued royalties and franchise fees |
1,795 | 2,137 | ||||||
Accrued capital expenditures |
1,306 | 2,204 | ||||||
Accrued insurance premiums |
987 | 6,123 | ||||||
Accrued professional fees |
798 | 794 | ||||||
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
693 | 315 | ||||||
Accrued acquisition costs |
366 | 631 | ||||||
Fair value of warrants |
293 | | ||||||
Other accrued expenses and current liabilities |
4,353 | 2,782 | ||||||
$ | 57,220 | $ | 62,802 | |||||
13. Debt
Debt consists of the following:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Credit Facilities: |
||||||||
U.S. dollar denominated revolving credit facility, floating interest rate at
4.5% as of December 31, 2008 |
$ | | $ | 34,600 | ||||
Canadian dollar denominated revolving credit facility, floating interest rate at 4.8%
and 5.3%, net of discount of nil and $56, as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively |
5,604 | 27,699 | ||||||
U.S. dollar denominated term loan facility, floating interest rate at 3.8%
and 4.5%, net of discount of $993 and $1,268, as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively |
36,902 | 38,125 | ||||||
Canadian dollar denominated term loan facility, floating interest rate at 4.0%
and 5.3%, net of discount of $3,330 and $3,668, as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively |
113,962 | 103,505 | ||||||
Senior Subordinated Notes, fixed interest rate at 9.5%, due 2014, net of discount
of $1,480 and $1,146 as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively |
208,520 | 158,854 | ||||||
Other secured notes payable, interest at 4.5% to 7.8%, due through
2025, net of discount of $1,190 and $1,563 as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively |
6,058 | 6,891 | ||||||
Other subordinated notes payable, interest at 6.7%, due through 2017 |
2,233 | 2,395 | ||||||
373,279 | 372,069 | |||||||
Less: Current portion |
(17,750 | ) | (11,102 | ) | ||||
Long-term portion |
$ | 355,529 | $ | 360,967 | ||||
18
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Senior Secured Credit Facilities
On October 8, 2008 we refinanced our Senior Secured Credit Facilities with new Senior Secured
Credit Facilities (the Credit Facilities) with a consortium of new lenders. The Credit Facilities
provide for a revolving credit facility of $124.8 million, which is available to either Waste
Services, Inc. and our U.S. operations or our Canadian operations, in U.S. or Canadian dollars, and
C$16.3 million, which is available to our Canadian operations. The new Credit Facilities also
provide for term loans with initial principal balances of $39.9 million to Waste Services, Inc. and
C$132.2 million to Waste Services (CA) Inc. The revolver commitments terminate on October 8, 2013
and the term loans mature in specified quarterly installments through October 8, 2013. The Credit
Facilities are available to us as base rate loans, Eurodollar loans or Bankers Acceptance loans,
plus an applicable margin, as defined, at our option in the respective lending jurisdiction. The
Credit Facilities are secured by all of our assets, including those of our domestic and foreign
subsidiaries, and are guaranteed by all of our domestic and foreign subsidiaries. As of September
30, 2009, there was C$6.0 million outstanding on the Canadian dollar denominated revolving credit
facility and $11.6 million and C$14.0 million of revolver capacity was used to support outstanding
letters of credit in the U.S. and Canada, respectively. As of September 30, 2009, no amounts were
drawn on our U.S. dollar denominated revolving credit facility and we had unused availability of
$109.8 million under our revolving credit facilities, subject to certain conditions.
Our Credit Facilities contain certain financial and other covenants that restrict our ability
to, among other things, make capital expenditures, incur indebtedness, incur liens, dispose of
property, repay debt, pay dividends, repurchase shares and make certain acquisitions. Our financial
covenants include: (i) maximum total leverage; (ii) maximum senior secured leverage; and (iii)
minimum interest coverage. The covenants and restrictions limit the manner in which we conduct our
operations and could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital. As of September 30,
2009, we were in compliance with the financial covenants.
Other Secured Notes Payable
Included in our other secured notes payable is a $10.5 million non-interest bearing promissory
note with payments of $125,000 per month until June 2014. The net present value of the remaining
payments due under the note as of September 30, 2009 approximates $5.9 million and accretes at
7.8%. The note is secured by a transfer station and related permit.
Senior Subordinated Notes
On April 30, 2004, we completed a private offering of 91/2% Senior Subordinated Notes (Senior
Subordinated Notes) due 2014 for gross proceeds of $160.0 million. On September 21, 2009 we
completed an additional private placement of $50.0 million aggregate principal of our Senior
Subordinated Notes, with terms identical to the initial offering. This additional private placement
resulted in gross proceeds of $49.5 million with an additional $2.1 million received from the
purchasers for accrued interest. The Senior Subordinated Notes mature on April 15, 2014. Interest
on the Senior Subordinated Notes is payable semiannually on October 15 and April 15. The Senior
Subordinated Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at our option, on or after April 15, 2009,
at a redemption price of 104.75% of the principal amount, declining ratably in annual increments to
par on or after April 15, 2012, together with accrued interest to the redemption date. Upon a
change of control, as such term is defined in the Indenture, we are required to offer to repurchase
all the Senior Subordinated Notes at 101.0% of the principal amount, together with accrued interest
and liquidated damages, if any, and obtain the consent of our senior lenders to such payment or
repay indebtedness under our Credit Facilities.
The Senior Subordinated Notes are unsecured and are subordinate to our existing and future
senior secured indebtedness, including our Credit Facilities, rank equally with any unsecured
senior subordinated indebtedness and senior to our existing and future subordinated indebtedness.
Our obligations with respect to the Senior Subordinated Notes, including principal, interest,
premium, if any, and liquidated damages, if any, are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an
unsecured, senior subordinated basis by all of our existing and future domestic and foreign
restricted subsidiaries.
The Senior Subordinated Notes contain certain covenants that, in certain circumstances and
subject to certain limitations and qualifications, restrict, among other things: (i) the incurrence
of additional debt; (ii) the payment of dividends and repurchases of stock; (iii) the issuance of
preferred stock and the issuance of stock of our subsidiaries; (iv) certain investments; (v)
transactions with affiliates; and (vi) certain sales of assets.
19
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The indenture relating to our Senior Subordinated Notes contains cross default provisions (i)
should we fail to pay the principal amount of other indebtedness when due (after applicable grace
periods) or the maturity date of that indebtedness is accelerated and the amount in question is
$10.0 million or more or (ii) should we fail to pay judgments in excess of $10.0 million in the
aggregate for more than 60 days.
14. Commitments and Contingencies
Environmental Risks
We are subject to liability for environmental damage that our solid waste facilities may
cause, including damage to neighboring landowners or residents, particularly as a result of the
contamination of soil, groundwater or surface water, including damage resulting from conditions
existing prior to the acquisition of such facilities. Pollutants or hazardous substances whose
transportation, treatment or disposal was arranged by us or our predecessors, may also subject us
to liability for any off-site environmental contamination caused by these pollutants or hazardous
substances.
Any substantial liability for environmental damage incurred by us could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. As of the date of
these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, we estimate the range of reasonably possible
losses related to environmental matters to be insignificant, and we are not aware of any such
environmental liabilities that would be material to our operations or financial condition.
Legal Proceedings
In the normal course of our business and as a result of the extensive governmental regulation
of the solid waste industry, we may periodically become subject to various judicial and
administrative proceedings involving federal, provincial, state or local agencies. In these
proceedings, an agency may seek to impose fines on us or revoke or deny renewal of an operating
permit or license that is required for our operations. From time to time, we may also be subject to
actions brought by citizens groups, adjacent landowners or residents in connection with the
permitting and licensing of transfer stations and landfills or allegations related to environmental
damage or violations of the permits and licenses pursuant to which we operate. In addition, we may
become party to various claims and suits for alleged damages to persons and property, alleged
violations of certain laws and alleged liabilities arising out of matters occurring during the
normal operation of a waste management business.
No provision has been made in these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the above
matters. We do not currently believe that the possible losses in respect of outstanding litigation
matters would have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
Surety Bonds, Letters of Credit and Insurance
Municipal solid waste service and other service contracts, permits and licenses to operate
transfer stations, landfills and recycling facilities may require performance or surety bonds,
letters of credit or other means of financial assurance to secure contractual performance. To
collateralize our obligations we have provided customers, various regulatory authorities and our
insurer with such bonds and letters of credit amounting to approximately $83.2 million and $83.8
million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The majority of these
obligations expire each year and will need to be renewed.
Our domestic based workers compensation, automobile and general liability insurance coverage
is subject to certain deductible limits. We retain up to $0.5 million and $0.25 million of risk per
claim, plus claims handling expense under our workers compensation and our auto and general
liability insurance programs, respectively. Claims in excess of such deductible levels are fully
insured subject to our policy limits. However, we have a limited claims history for our U.S.
operations and it is reasonably possible that recorded reserves may not be adequate to cover future
payments of claims. Adjustments, if any, to our reserves will be reflected in the period in which
the adjustments are known. As of September 30, 2009, and included in the $83.2 million of bonds and
letters of credit previously discussed, we have posted a letter of credit with our U.S. insurer of
approximately $10.9 million to secure the liability for losses within the deductible limit.
Provisions for retained claims are made by charges to expense based on periodic evaluations by
management of the estimated ultimate liabilities on both reported and incurred but not reported
claims. Adjustments, if any, to the estimated reserves resulting from ultimate claim payments will
be reflected in operations in the periods in which such adjustments become known.
20
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The changes in insurance reserves for our U.S. operations for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows (unaudited):
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Balance at the beginning of the period |
$ | 6,505 | $ | 6,055 | ||||
Provisions |
2,801 | 3,975 | ||||||
Payments |
(2,542 | ) | (3,408 | ) | ||||
Unfavorable (favovable) claim development for prior periods |
(321 | ) | 823 | |||||
Balance at the end of the period |
$ | 6,443 | $ | 7,445 | ||||
Disposal Agreement
On November 22, 2002, we entered into a Put or Pay Disposal Agreement (the Disposal
Agreement) with RCI Environment Inc., Centres de Transbordement et de Valorisation Nord Sud Inc.,
RCM Environnement Inc., collectively the RCI Companies, and Intersan Inc. (Intersan), a
subsidiary of Waste Management of Canada Corporation (formerly Canadian Waste Services, Inc.),
pursuant to which we, together with the RCI Companies, agreed to deliver to certain of Intersans
landfill sites and transfer stations in Quebec, Canada, over the five year period from the date of
the Disposal Agreement, 850,000 metric tonnes of waste per year, and for the next two years after
the expiration of the first five year term, 710,000 metric tonnes of waste per year at a fixed
disposal rate set out in the Disposal Agreement. If we and the RCI Companies fail to deliver the
required tonnage, we are jointly and severally required to pay to Intersan, C$23.67 per metric
tonne for every tonne below the required tonnage. If a portion of the annual tonnage commitment is
not delivered to a specific site we are also required to pay C$8.00 per metric tonne for every
tonne below the site specific allocation. Our obligations to Intersan are secured by a letter of
credit for C$4.0 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we were not required to
make any payments to Intersan under the Disposal Agreement. The Disposal Agreement will expire on
November 22, 2009, at which time our letter of credit also expires. The annual cost to us of
maintaining the letter of credit is approximately $0.1 million. The companies within the RCI Group
are controlled by a director of ours and/or individuals related to that director.
Concurrent with the Disposal Agreement, we entered into a three-year agreement with Canadian
Waste Services, Inc. to allow us to deliver up to 75,000 tons in year one and up to 100,000 tons in
years two and three of non-hazardous solid waste to their landfill in Michigan at negotiated fixed
rates per ton, which has since expired.
Purchase Agreement
During July 2009, we entered into an agreement to acquire 875 acres of agricultural land in
Hardee County, Florida, subject to the land being permitted for the operation of a Class I
landfill. The purchase price, at the sellers option, will be either (i) a lump sum payment of
$10.0 million to $11.6 million depending on the timing of the closing of the transaction and
payable on closing or (ii) a portion of the lump sum payment at closing, ranging from $1.0 million
to $7.0 million, plus a future stream of annual payments calculated as the greater of a specified
annual minimum, ranging from $0.2 million to $0.5 million, or a percentage of revenues from the
operation of the landfill, until the property ceases to be used for landfill related operations,
but not less than twenty years.
Office Lease
We lease office premises in an office tower in Burlington, Ontario owned by Westbury
International (1991) Corporation, a property development company controlled by Michael H. DeGroote,
one of our directors, the son of Michael G. DeGroote, our Chairman and brother of Gary W. DeGroote,
one of our directors. The leased premises consist of approximately 9,255 square feet. The term of
the lease is 101/2 years commencing in 2004, with a right to extend for a further five years. Rent
expense recognized under the terms of this lease was less than $0.1 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008.
21
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other Contractual Arrangements
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we completed a restructuring of corporate overhead and
other administrative and operational functions. The plan included the closing of our U.S. corporate
office and the consolidation of corporate administrative functions to our headquarters in
Burlington, Ontario, reductions in staffing levels in both overhead and operational positions and
the termination of certain consulting arrangements. In connection with the execution of the plan,
in the fourth quarter of 2008 we recognized a charge of $6.9 million for selling, general and
administrative expense, which consists of (i) $3.6 million for severance and related costs, (ii)
$0.9 million for rent, net of estimated sub-let income of $0.7 million, due to the closure of our
U.S. corporate office and (iii) $2.4 million for the termination of certain consulting
arrangements, the majority of which relate to agreements we had entered into with previous owners
of businesses that were acquired. As of September 30, 2009, $2.9 million remains accrued relative
to this plan.
The following table summarizes the activity for these accrued restructuring costs for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 (unaudited):
Severance | ||||||||||||||||
and Related | ||||||||||||||||
Costs | Rent | Consulting | Total | |||||||||||||
Balance at the beginning of the period |
$ | 3,238 | $ | 984 | $ | 812 | $ | 5,034 | ||||||||
Changes in estimates and other provisions |
(86 | ) | (106 | ) | | (192 | ) | |||||||||
Payments |
(1,689 | ) | (253 | ) | (187 | ) | (2,129 | ) | ||||||||
Foreign exchange and other |
171 | | | 171 | ||||||||||||
Balance at the end of the period |
$ | 1,634 | $ | 625 | $ | 625 | $ | 2,884 | ||||||||
During October 2009 we entered into a sub-lease of our former U.S. corporate office. This
sublease is for an initial term of three years commencing November 1, 2009 and includes a three
year extension term at the discretion of the tenant, which we have assumed will occur. Our original
estimates have been revised to reflect these circumstances and other changes based on revised
information. Should our assumptions require future revision as additional information becomes
available, we may have additional charges in future periods.
In connection with the additional private placement of Senior Subordinated Notes completed on
September 21, 2009, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with the initial purchasers of
these notes in which we agreed to (i) file a registration statement with respect to the Senior
Subordinated Notes within 120 days of the closing date of the issuance of the notes, or the
issuance date, pursuant to which we will exchange the Senior Subordinated Notes for registered
notes with terms identical to the Senior Subordinated Notes; (ii) have such registration statement
declared effective within 210 days of the closing date;
(iii) maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement for minimum periods specified
in the agreement; and (iv) file a shelf registration statement in the circumstances and within the
time periods specified in the agreement. If we do not comply with these obligations, we will be
required to pay liquidated damages, in cash, in an amount equal to $0.05 per week per $1,000 in
principal amount of the unregistered Senior Subordinated Notes for each week that the default
continues, for the first 90-days following default. Thereafter, the amount of liquidated damages
will increase by an additional $0.05 per week per $1,000 in principal amount of unregistered Senior
Subordinated Notes for each subsequent 90-day period until all defaults have been cured, to a
maximum of $0.50 per week per $1,000 in principal amount of unregistered Senior Subordinated Notes
outstanding. Liquidated damages, if any, are payable at the same time as interest payments due
under the Senior Subordinated Notes. We do not believe it is probable that penalty payments will be
made for this Registration Rights Agreement, and accordingly we have not accrued for such potential
penalties as of September 30, 2009.
From time to time and in the ordinary course of business we may enter into certain
acquisitions whereby we will also enter into a royalty agreement. Royalty agreements are usually
based on the amount of waste deposited at our landfill sites or in certain instances our transfer
stations. Royalties are expensed as incurred and recognized as a cost of operations.
22
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
15. Authorized Capital Stock and Migration Transaction
Total Shares
As of September 30, 2009, we were authorized to issue a total of 171,666,666 shares of capital
stock consisting of:
| 166,666,666 shares of common stock, par value 0.01 per share; and | ||
| 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value 0.01 per share, of which 100,000 shares have been designated as Series A Preferred Stock. |
Preferred Stock
The Series A Preferred Stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share and a liquidation preference
of $1,000.00 per share, have the powers, preferences and other special rights and the
qualifications, limitations and restrictions that are set forth in the Certificate of Designations
of Series A Preferred Stock as amended. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, no shares
of Series A Preferred Stock were outstanding. The Special Voting Preferred Stock has the rights,
preference, and limitations set forth in the Amended Certificate of Designation of Special Voting
Preferred Stock. Upon the completion of the exchange of all the exchangeable shares of Waste
Services (CA) Inc.in the second quarter of 2009, the one share that was designated as Special
Voting Preferred Stock was automatically redeemed for $1.00 and is now deemed retired and
cancelled, and may not be reissued.
Migration Transaction
Effective July 31, 2004, we entered into a migration transaction by which our corporate
structure was reorganized so that Waste Services became the ultimate parent company of our
corporate group. Prior to the migration transaction, we were a subsidiary of Waste Services (CA)
Inc. After the migration transaction, Waste Services (CA) Inc. became our subsidiary.
The migration transaction occurred by way of a plan of arrangement under the Business
Corporations Act (Ontario) and consisted primarily of: (i) the exchange of 29,219,011 common shares
of Waste Services (CA) Inc. for 29,219,011 shares of our common stock; and (ii) the conversion of
the remaining 3,076,558 common shares of Waste Services (CA) Inc. held by non-U.S. residents and
who elected to receive exchangeable shares into 9,229,676 exchangeable shares of Waste Services
(CA) Inc., which are exchangeable into 3,076,558 shares of our common stock. The transaction was
approved by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on July 30, 2004 and by our shareholders at a
special meeting held on July 27, 2004.
The terms of the exchangeable shares of Waste Services (CA) Inc. were the economic and
functional equivalent of our common stock. Holders of exchangeable shares (i) were entitled to
receive the same dividends as holders of shares of our common stock and (ii) were entitled to vote
on the same matters as holders of shares of our common stock. Such voting was accomplished through
the one share of Special Voting Preferred Stock held by Computershare Trust Company of Canada as
trustee, who voted on the instructions of the holders of the exchangeable shares (one-third of one
vote for each exchangeable share). Holders of exchangeable shares also had the right to exchange
their exchangeable shares for shares of our common stock on the basis of one-third of a share of
our common stock for each one exchangeable share. Upon the occurrence of certain events, such as
the liquidation of Waste Services (CA) Inc., or after the redemption date, our Canadian holding
company, Capital Environmental Holdings Company had the right to purchase each exchangeable share
for one-third of one share of our common stock, plus all declared and unpaid dividends on the
exchangeable share and payment for any fractional shares.
During the second quarter of 2009, all remaining exchangeable shares of Waste Services (CA)
Inc. not owned by affiliates were exchanged for shares of our common stock.
23
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Warrants
We have outstanding warrants to purchase shares of our common stock. As of September 30, 2009,
all of these warrants were exercisable. Activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 for
shares issuable upon exercise of these warrants, which expire at various dates through September
2011, is summarized as follows (unaudited):
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | |||||||||||||||
Number | Average | Remaining | Aggregate | |||||||||||||
of Shares | Exercise | Contractual | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||
Issuable | Price | Term (Years) | Value | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at the beginning of the period |
3,317,695 | $ | 9.47 | 1.3 | $ | | ||||||||||
Expired during the period |
(513,000 | ) | 12.68 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at the end of the period |
2,804,695 | $ | 8.88 | 0.8 | $ | | ||||||||||
16. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) includes the effects of foreign currency translation.
Comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is as
follows (unaudited):
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 6,717 | $ | 3,469 | $ | 14,173 | $ | 20,108 | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
5,261 | (9,275 | ) | 7,881 | (15,306 | ) | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 11,978 | $ | (5,806 | ) | $ | 22,054 | $ | 4,802 | |||||||
17. Segment Information
In making the determination of our operating and reporting segments, we consider our
organization and reporting structure and the information used by our chief operating decision maker
to make decisions about resource allocation and performance assessment. We are organized along
geographic locations or regions within the U.S. and Canada. Our Canadian operations are organized
between two regions, Eastern and Western Canada, while in the U.S. we operate exclusively in
Florida. For segment reporting, we define Corporate as overhead expenses, not specifically
attributable to our Florida or Canadian operations, incurred both domestically and in Canada. As
previously discussed, we have divested of our Jacksonville, Florida operations and as such, the
results of these operations are presented as discontinued operations and are not included in the
segment data presented.
We believe our Canadian operating segments may be aggregated for segment reporting purposes
for the following reasons: (i) these segments are economically similar; (ii) the nature of the
service, waste collection and disposal, is the same and transferable across locations; (iii) the
type and class of customer is consistent among our regions and districts; (iv) the methods used to
deliver services are essentially the same (e.g. containers collect waste at market locations and
trucks collect and transfer waste to landfills); and (v) the regulatory environment is consistent
within Canada.
We do not have significant (in volume or dollars) inter-segment operation-related
transactions. Summarized financial information concerning our reportable segments for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows (unaudited):
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Florida | Canada | Corporate | Total | |||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 50,821 | $ | 61,640 | $ | | $ | 112,461 | ||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
6,293 | 4,424 | 223 | 10,940 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
9,972 | 12,504 | (5,237 | ) | 17,239 | |||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
2,901 | 5,051 | 114 | 8,066 |
24
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Florida | Canada | Corporate | Total | |||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 58,468 | $ | 67,277 | $ | | $ | 125,745 | ||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
6,482 | 4,714 | 307 | 11,503 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
9,347 | 13,035 | (5,861 | ) | 16,521 | |||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
8,971 | 9,688 | 162 | 18,821 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Florida | Canada | Corporate | Total | |||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 151,801 | $ | 163,937 | $ | | $ | 315,738 | ||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
18,973 | 12,362 | 681 | 32,016 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
29,053 | 29,700 | (15,428 | ) | 43,325 | |||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
11,132 | 12,915 | 366 | 24,413 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Florida | Canada | Corporate | Total | |||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 179,331 | $ | 191,304 | $ | | $ | 370,635 | ||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
19,828 | 13,995 | 1,003 | 34,826 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
29,651 | 35,885 | (20,009 | ) | 45,527 | |||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
16,472 | 22,180 | 568 | 39,220 |
18. Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, Waste Services is the primary obligor under
the Senior Subordinated Notes. Waste Services has no independent operating assets or operations,
and the guarantees of our domestic and Canadian subsidiaries, which are all wholly owned
subsidiaries, are full and unconditional and joint and several with respect to the Senior
Subordinated Notes, including principal, interest, premium, if any, and liquidated damages, if any.
In October 2008 and pursuant to certain amendments to the Indenture to the Senior Subordinated
Notes, our Canadian subsidiaries became guarantors under the Senior Subordinated Notes. Prior to
these amendments, our Canadian subsidiaries did not guarantee the Senior Subordinated Notes.
25
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Presented below are our Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and the Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Statement
of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 of Waste Services, Inc. (the Parent),
our U.S. guarantor subsidiaries (Guarantors) and the then non-guarantor Canadian subsidiaries
(Non-guarantors):
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non- | ||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | | $ | 58,468 | $ | 67,277 | $ | | $ | 125,745 | ||||||||||
Operating and other expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of operations (exclusive of depreciation,
depletion and amortization) |
| 38,114 | 44,398 | | 82,512 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense (exclusive
of depreciation, depletion and amortization) |
3,142 | 4,505 | 7,427 | | 15,074 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
27 | 6,482 | 4,994 | | 11,503 | |||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange gain and other |
| 20 | 115 | | 135 | |||||||||||||||
Equity earnings in investees, net of tax |
(14,297 | ) | | | 14,297 | | ||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
11,128 | 9,347 | 10,343 | (14,297 | ) | 16,521 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
7,659 | 42 | 29 | | 7,730 | |||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
3,469 | 9,305 | 10,314 | (14,297 | ) | 8,791 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
| 1,739 | 3,583 | | 5,322 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,469 | $ | 7,566 | $ | 6,731 | $ | (14,297 | ) | $ | 3,469 | |||||||||
26
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non- | ||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | | $ | 179,331 | $ | 191,304 | $ | | $ | 370,635 | ||||||||||
Operating and other expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of operations (exclusive of depreciation,
depletion and amortization) |
| 116,497 | 126,164 | | 242,661 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense (exclusive
of depreciation, depletion and amortization) |
10,236 | 13,819 | 23,888 | | 47,943 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
75 | 19,828 | 14,923 | | 34,826 | |||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange loss (gain) and other |
1 | (464 | ) | 141 | | (322 | ) | |||||||||||||
Equity earnings in investees, net of tax |
(55,902 | ) | | | 55,902 | | ||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
45,590 | 29,651 | 26,188 | (55,902 | ) | 45,527 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
25,482 | 134 | 154 | | 25,770 | |||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
20,108 | 29,517 | 26,034 | (55,902 | ) | 19,757 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
| (1,944 | ) | 8,871 | | 6,927 | ||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
20,108 | 31,461 | 17,163 | (55,902 | ) | 12,830 | ||||||||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations,
net of income tax provision of $266 |
| 409 | | | 409 | |||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations,
net of income tax provision of $4,485 |
| 6,869 | | | 6,869 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 20,108 | $ | 38,739 | $ | 17,163 | $ | (55,902 | ) | $ | 20,108 | |||||||||
27
Table of Contents
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non- | ||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
$ | (17,164 | ) | $ | 43,426 | $ | 23,824 | $ | | $ | 50,086 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(61 | ) | (16,472 | ) | (22,687 | ) | | (39,220 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from asset sales and business divestitures |
10 | 57,576 | 129 | | 57,715 | |||||||||||||||
Deposits for business acquisitions and other |
(3,827 | ) | | (49 | ) | | (3,876 | ) | ||||||||||||
Intercompany |
83,640 | | | (83,640 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations |
79,762 | 41,104 | (22,607 | ) | (83,640 | ) | 14,619 | |||||||||||||
Net cash used in discontinued operations |
| (43 | ) | | | (43 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
79,762 | 41,061 | (22,607 | ) | (83,640 | ) | 14,576 | |||||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Principal repayments of debt and capital lease obligations |
(43,447 | ) | (150 | ) | | | (43,597 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from the exercise of options and warrants |
60 | | | | 60 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany |
| (84,523 | ) | 883 | 83,640 | | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities continuing operations |
(43,387 | ) | (84,673 | ) | 883 | 83,640 | (43,537 | ) | ||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes
on cash and cash equivalents |
| | (836 | ) | | (836 | ) | |||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash |
19,211 | (186 | ) | 1,264 | | 20,289 | ||||||||||||||
Cash at the beginning of the period |
9,080 | 239 | 11,387 | | 20,706 | |||||||||||||||
Cash at the end of the period |
$ | 28,291 | $ | 53 | $ | 12,651 | $ | | $ | 40,995 | ||||||||||
28
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this report as well as
our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, including the factors set forth in the section titled Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and factors affecting future results as well as our
other filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Overview
We are a multi-regional, integrated solid waste services company, providing collection,
transfer, landfill disposal and recycling services for commercial, industrial and residential
customers. Our operating strategy is disposal-based, whereby we enter geographic markets with
attractive growth or positive competitive characteristics by acquiring and developing landfill
disposal capacity, then acquiring and developing waste collection and transfer operations. Our
operations are located in the United States and Canada. Our U.S. operations are located in Florida
and our Canadian operations are located in Eastern Canada (Ontario) and Western Canada (Alberta,
Saskatchewan and British Columbia). We divested our Jacksonville, Florida operations in March
2008, and as a result, these operations are presented as discontinued for all periods presented.
Sources of Revenue
Our revenue consists primarily of fees charged to customers for solid waste collection,
landfill disposal, transfer and recycling services.
We derive our collection revenue from services provided to commercial, industrial and
residential customers. Collection services are generally performed under service agreements or
pursuant to contracts with municipalities. We recognize revenue when services are rendered. Amounts
billed to customers prior to providing the related services are reflected as deferred revenue and
reported as revenue in the periods in which the services are rendered.
We provide collection services for commercial and industrial customers generally under one to
five year service agreements. We determine the fees we charge our customers based on a variety of
factors, including collection frequency, level of service, route density, the type, volume and
weight of the waste collected, type of equipment and containers furnished, the distance to the
disposal or processing facility, the cost of disposal or processing and prices charged by
competitors for similar services. Our contracts with commercial and industrial customers typically
allow us to pass on increased costs resulting from variable items such as disposal and fuel costs
and surcharges. Our ability to pass on cost increases is however, sometimes limited by the terms of
our contracts.
We provide residential waste collection services through a variety of contractual
arrangements, including contracts with municipalities, owners and operators of large residential
complexes, mobile home parks and homeowner associations or through subscription arrangements with
individual homeowners. Our contracts with municipalities are typically for a term of three to ten
years and contain a formula, generally based on a predetermined published price index, for
adjustments to fees to cover increases in some, but not all, of our operating costs. Certain of our
contracts with municipalities contain renewal provisions. The fees we charge for residential solid
waste collection services provided on a subscription basis are based primarily on route density,
the frequency and level of service, the distance to the disposal or processing facility, the cost
of disposal or processing and prices we charge in the market for similar services.
We charge our landfill and transfer station customers a tipping fee on a per ton or per cubic
yard basis for disposing of their solid waste at our transfer stations and landfills. We generally
base our landfill tipping fees on market factors and the type and weight of, or volume of the waste
deposited. We generally base our transfer station tipping fees on market factors and the cost of
processing the waste deposited at the transfer station, the cost of transporting the waste to a
disposal facility and the cost of disposal.
Material recovery facilities generate revenue from the sale of recyclable commodities. In an
effort to reduce our exposure to commodity price fluctuations on recycled materials, where
competitive pressures permit, we charge collection or processing fees for recycling volume
collected from our customers. However, sustained declines in the price of recycled commodities,
including but not limited to, aluminum, used corrugated cardboard or news print would lower our
revenue from such commodities and adversely affect our margins and profitability.
29
Table of Contents
Expense Structure
Our cost of operations primarily includes tipping fees and related disposal costs, labor and
related benefit costs, equipment maintenance, fuel, vehicle, liability and workers compensation
insurance and landfill capping, closure and post-closure costs. Our strategy is to create
vertically integrated operations where possible, using transfer stations to link collection
operations with our landfills to increase internalization of our waste volume. Internalization
lowers our disposal costs by allowing us to eliminate tipping fees otherwise paid to third party
landfill or transfer station operators. We believe that internalization provides us with a
competitive advantage by allowing us to be a low cost provider in our markets. We expect that our
internalization will gradually increase over time as we develop our network of transfer stations
and maximize delivery of collection volumes to our landfill sites.
In markets where we do not have our own landfills, we seek to secure disposal arrangements
with municipalities or private owners of landfills or transfer stations. In these markets, our
ability to maintain competitive prices for our collection services is generally dependent upon our
ability to secure competitive disposal pricing. If owners of third party disposal sites discontinue
our arrangements, we would have to seek alternative disposal sites, which could impact our
profitability and cash flow. In addition, if third party disposal sites increase their tipping fees
and we are unable to pass these increases on to our collection customers, our profitability and
cash flow would be negatively impacted.
We believe that the age and condition of our vehicle fleet has a significant impact on
operating costs, including, but not limited to, repairs and maintenance, insurance and driver
training and retention costs. Through capital investment, we seek to maintain an average fleet age
of approximately six to seven years. We believe that this enables us to best control our repair and
maintenance costs, safety and insurance costs and employee turnover related costs.
Selling, general and administrative expenses include managerial costs, information systems,
sales force, administrative expenses and professional fees.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization includes depreciation of fixed assets over their
estimated useful lives using the straight-line method, depletion of landfill costs, including
capping, closure and post-closure obligations using the units-of-consumption method, and
amortization of intangible assets including customer relationships and contracts and covenants
not-to-compete, which are amortized over the expected life of the benefit to be received from such
intangibles.
Costs associated with acquisitions are expensed as they are incurred. These costs may include
transaction related costs and internal costs, including executive salaries, overhead and travel
costs. Prior to January 1, 2009, we capitalized certain third-party costs related to pending
acquisitions that are no longer capitalizable.
Recent Developments
Acquisitions and Dispositions
In October 2009, we acquired Republic Services operations in Miami-Dade County, Florida for
$32.0 million in cash plus an adjustment for working capital. We intend to internalize the waste
flow from this acquisition into our existing transfer station and landfill facilities. In October
2009, we also acquired a tuck-in hauling operation in the Tampa, Florida area for an aggregate
purchase price of $1.1 million.
In September 2009, we acquired the Miami-Dade County, Florida hauling operations of DisposAll
of South Florida, Inc. (DisposAll) for approximately $15.6 million, of which $1.3 million was
paid by way of a disposal credit for future fees charged to DisposAll for waste disposed at certain
of our transfer station and landfill facilities. We intend to internalize the waste flow from this
acquisition into our existing transfer station and landfill facilities.
During the first nine months of 2009, we also acquired four separate tuck-in hauling
operations in southwest Florida for an aggregate purchase price of $2.6 million. We are
internalizing construction and demolition waste volumes associated with these acquisitions into
certain of our existing transfer station and landfill facilities.
30
Table of Contents
During July 2009, we entered into an agreement to acquire 875 acres of agricultural land in
Hardee County, Florida, subject to the land being permitted for the operation of a Class I
landfill. The purchase price, at the sellers option, will be either (i) a lump sum payment of
$10.0 million to $11.6 million depending on the timing of the closing of the transaction and
payable on closing or (ii) a portion of the lump sum payment at closing, ranging from $1.0 million
to $7.0 million, plus a future stream of annual payments calculated as the greater of a specified
annual minimum, ranging from $0.2 million to $0.5 million, or a percentage of revenues from the
operation of the landfill, until the property ceases to be used for landfill related operations,
but not less than twenty years.
In December 2008, we acquired RIP, Inc., the owner of a construction and demolition waste
landfill in Citrus Country, Florida, for an aggregate purchase price of $7.7 million. Should the
site be permitted as a Class I landfill, Class III landfill, transfer station or a construction and
demolition operation, the sellers are entitled to future royalties at varied rates per ton based on
the volume and type of waste deposited at the site.
In December 2008, we acquired the assets of Commercial Clean-up Enterprises, Inc. and We Haul
of South Florida, Inc., collectively a construction and demolition hauling operation in Fort Myers
and Naples, Florida, for a total purchase price of $6.1 million, of which $1.6 million is deferred
and is being paid as we collect waste volumes from within the counties of Charlotte, Lee and
Collier, Florida. We are internalizing the waste volumes associated with this acquisition to our
SLD Landfill in southwest Florida.
In March 2008, we sold our hauling and material recovery operations and a construction and
demolition landfill site in the Jacksonville, Florida market to an independent third party. The
proceeds from this sale approximated $56.7 million in cash, including working capital. At the time
of close, we were actively pursuing an expansion at the landfill. If the construction and
demolition landfill site did not obtain certain permits relating to an expansion, we would have
been required to refund $10.0 million of the purchase price and receive title to the expansion
property. Accordingly, at the time of closing we deferred this portion of the proceeds, net of our
$3.0 million cost basis. During December 2008, the permits relating to the expansion were secured
and the deferred gain was recognized. Simultaneously with the closing of the sale transaction we
entered into an operating lease with the buyer for certain land and buildings used in the
Jacksonville, Florida operations, for a term of five years at $0.5 million per year. The lessee had
the option to purchase the leased assets for a purchase price of $6.0 million, which it exercised
in March 2009 resulting in a gain on sale of $3.3 million in the quarter. The proceeds from the
sale of the leased assets were utilized to repay amounts under the revolver portion of our Credit
Facilities. At the time of close in March 2008, we utilized $42.5 million of the proceeds to make
a prepayment of the term loan under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities. Accordingly, we expensed
approximately $0.5 million of unamortized debt issue costs relating to this retirement. For the
year ended December 31, 2008, we recognized a pre-tax gain on disposal of $18.4 million ($11.1
million net of tax) relative to the sale of the Jacksonville, Florida operations, of which $11.4
million ($6.9 million net of tax) was realized during the first nine months of 2008. Included in
the calculation of the gain on disposal for the Jacksonville, Florida operations was approximately
$23.6 million of goodwill. Subsequent to the disposal of the Jacksonville, Florida operations, we
adjusted the pre-tax gain on disposal for the settlement of working capital of approximately $0.2
million.
We have presented the net assets and operations of our Jacksonville, Florida operations, as
discontinued operations for all periods presented. Revenue from discontinued operations was nil and
$4.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and pre-tax
income from discontinued operations was nil and $0.7 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively. The transaction to dispose of the Jacksonville, Florida
operations was completed in 2008 and accordingly, these operations do not impact our 2009 results.
In April 2007, we completed the acquisition of a roll-off collection and transfer operation, a
transfer station development project and a landfill development project in southwest Florida
operated by USA Recycling Holdings, LLC, USA Recycling, LLC and Freedom Recycling Holdings, LLC for
a total purchase price of $51.2 million. The existing transfer station is permitted to accept
construction and demolition waste volume, and we are internalizing this additional volume to our
SLD Landfill in southwest Florida. Under the terms of the purchase agreement, $7.5 million is
contingent upon the receipt of certain landfill operating permits, $2.5 million is contingent on
the receipt of certain operating permits for the transfer station and $18.5 million is due and
payable at the earlier of the receipt of all operating permits for the landfill site, or January,
2009, and delivery of title to the property. Through the third quarter of 2008, we had advanced
$9.5 million towards the purchase of the landfill development project and incurred design and other
third party costs relative to this project totaling $0.8 million. In the fourth quarter of 2008 we
determined that the landfill development project was no longer economically viable, and as such we
ceased pursuing any further investment in this project. Accordingly, we recognized a charge for the
previous advances and capitalized costs of $10.3 million in December 2008. We will have no further
obligation relative to the $18.5 million payment or the $7.5 million contingent fee associated with
obtaining certain landfill operating permits.
31
Table of Contents
Goodwill
We test for impairment of goodwill annually on December 31 and whenever events or
circumstances change between annual tests that would indicate a possible impairment. Examples of
such events may include: (i) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business
climate; (ii) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; (iii) a more likely than not
expectation that a reporting unit or a significant portion thereof will be sold; (iv) continued or
sustained losses at a reporting unit; (v) a significant decline in our market capitalization as
compared to our book value or (vi) the testing for recoverability of a significant asset group
within the reporting unit. We test for impairment using a two-step process. The first step is a
screen for potential impairment, while the second step measures the amount of the impairment, if
any. The first step of the goodwill impairment test compares the fair value of a reporting unit
with its carrying amount, including goodwill.
During the first three quarters of 2009, our market capitalization declined from that of the
fourth quarter of 2008. We considered these declines to be indicators of possible impairment of
goodwill. As of March 31, 2009, June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2009, we performed interim step
one screens for impairment, which we passed and accordingly, we did not proceed to the second step,
and we concluded that our goodwill was not impaired. Consistent with our annual goodwill tests
performed in prior years, for these interim impairment tests we defined our reporting units to be
consistent with our operating segments: Eastern Canada, Western Canada and Florida. In determining
fair value, we have utilized discounted future cash flows. We may compare the results of fair value
calculated using discounted cash flows to other fair value techniques including: (i) operating
results based on a comparative multiple of earnings or revenues; (ii) offers from interested
investors, if any; or (iii) appraisals. There may be instances where these alternative methods
provide a more accurate measure or indication of fair value. Significant estimates used in the fair
value calculation utilizing discounted future cash flows include, but are not limited to: (i)
estimates of future revenue and expense growth by reporting unit (revenue has been projected to
grow by approximately 3% to 13% with corresponding operating margins ranging from approximately 20%
to 35% over the forecast period); (ii) future estimated effective tax rates, which we estimate to
range between 32% and 40%; (iii) future estimated capital expenditures as well as future required
investments in working capital; (iv) estimated discount rate, which we estimate to range between
11% and 12%; (v) the ability to utilize certain domestic tax attributes and (vi) the future
terminal value of the reporting unit, which is based on its ability to exist into perpetuity and in
part on the estimated rate of inflation, which was approximately 2.5%. There were no substantial
changes in the methodologies employed, significant assumptions used, or calculations applied in the
first step of these interim impairment tests compared to our annual test for 2008.
In preparing our interim tests for impairment, we determined that the sum of our reporting
unit fair values exceeded our market capitalization. We determined market capitalization as the
fair value of our common shares outstanding using the twenty day weighted average to the end of the
interim period. We believe one of the primary reconciling differences between fair value and our
market capitalization relates to control premium. Control premium is the savings and / or synergies
a market participant could realize by obtaining control and eliminating duplicative overhead costs
and realizing operating efficiencies from the consolidation of routes and internalization of waste
streams. Additionally, we believe there are qualitative factors that externally influence our
market capitalization including, but not limited to:
| The fact that, to a significant extent, our shares are held by insiders and affiliates, reducing market liquidity. | ||
| One of our larger shareholders, due to circumstances unrelated to us, is liquidating their position putting pressure on the market price of our shares. | ||
| We believe that in general, the market continues to discount the value of common equity, believing that current leverage ratios are not sustainable and companies will be required to refinance debt at higher rates and / or issue additional equity thereby diluting current shareholders. However, as a result of the October 2008 refinancing of our Senior Secured Credit Facilities and September 2009 additional private placement of $50.0 million aggregate principal of our Senior Subordinated Notes, we believe our capital structure to be stable, but such stability is not reflected in our share price. |
We will continue to monitor market trends in our business, the related expected cash flows and
our calculation of market capitalization for purposes of identifying possible indicators of
impairment. Should our book value per share continue to exceed our market price per share, or we
have other indicators of impairment, as previously discussed, we will be required to perform
additional interim goodwill impairment analyses, which may lead to the recognition of a goodwill
impairment. Additionally, we would then be required to review our remaining long-lived assets for
potential impairment.
32
Table of Contents
For the third quarter of 2009, we performed a sensitivity analysis for our interim impairment
test. For the September 30, 2009 test, we noted that a 10% decrease in projected operating margins
over the forecast period would result in the requirement to perform a step two analysis for the
Florida and Western Canada reporting units, but would not require a step two analysis for the
Eastern Canada reporting unit. We also performed a sensitivity analysis on the market weighted
average cost of capital and noted that for the September 30, 2009 test, a 10% increase in the
market weighted average cost of capital would result in the requirement to perform a step two
analysis for the Florida reporting unit, but would not require a step two analysis for the Western
Canada or Eastern Canada reporting units.
The estimated fair values of our reporting units, as calculated for the September 30, 2009
impairment test, exceeded the carrying values of the reporting units by 4% to 54%. The Florida
reporting unit represented the low end of this range due in part to the severity of the recent
economic downturn experienced in the Florida market.
Future events, including but not limited to continued declines in economic activity, loss of
contracts or a significant number of customers or a rapid increase in costs or capital
expenditures, could cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that goodwill
associated with the affected reporting units is impaired. Any resulting goodwill impairment loss
could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Results of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
A portion of our operations is domiciled in Canada. For each reporting period we translate the
results of operations and financial condition of our Canadian operations into U.S. dollars.
Therefore, the reported results of our operations and financial condition are subject to changes in
the exchange relationship between the two currencies. For example, as the Canadian dollar
strengthens against the U.S. dollar, revenue is favorably affected and conversely expenses are
unfavorably affected. Assets and liabilities of our Canadian operations are translated from
Canadian dollars into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the relevant balance sheet
dates, and revenue and expenses of our Canadian operations are translated from Canadian dollars
into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rates prevailing during the period. Unrealized gains and
losses on translation of our Canadian operations into U.S. dollars are reported as a separate
component of shareholders equity and are included in comprehensive income or loss. Monetary assets
and liabilities are re-measured from U.S. dollars into Canadian dollars and then translated into
U.S. dollars. The effects of re-measurement are reported currently as a component of net income.
Currently, we do not hedge our exposure to changes in foreign exchange rates.
Exchange rates for the Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar that are applicable for the periods
covered by the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are summarized as
follows:
As of: |
||||
September 30,
2009 |
$ | 0.9340 | ||
December 31,
2008 |
0.8210 | |||
For the three months ended: |
||||
September 30,
2009 |
$ | 0.9107 | ||
September 30,
2008 |
0.9606 | |||
For the nine months ended: |
||||
September 30,
2009 |
$ | 0.8548 | ||
September 30,
2008 |
0.9818 |
33
Table of Contents
Our consolidated results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008 are as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Florida | Canada | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 50,821 | 100.0 | % | $ | 61,640 | 100.0 | % | $ | 112,461 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of
operations |
30,833 | 60.7 | % | 40,371 | 65.5 | % | 71,204 | 63.3 | % | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative
expense |
6,155 | 12.1 | % | 6,930 | 11.2 | % | 13,085 | 11.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization |
6,317 | 12.4 | % | 4,623 | 7.5 | % | 10,940 | 9.8 | % | |||||||||||||||
Loss (gain) on sale of property and equipment,
foreign exchange and
other |
(76 | ) | -0.1 | % | 69 | 0.1 | % | (7 | ) | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Income from
operations |
$ | 7,592 | 14.9 | % | $ | 9,647 | 15.7 | % | $ | 17,239 | 15.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Florida | Canada | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 58,468 | 100.0 | % | $ | 67,277 | 100.0 | % | $ | 125,745 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of
operations |
38,114 | 65.2 | % | 44,398 | 66.0 | % | 82,512 | 65.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative
expense |
7,647 | 13.1 | % | 7,427 | 11.0 | % | 15,074 | 12.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization |
6,509 | 11.1 | % | 4,994 | 7.4 | % | 11,503 | 9.1 | % | |||||||||||||||
Loss on sale of property and equipment,
foreign exchange and
other |
20 | 0.0 | % | 115 | 0.2 | % | 135 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||||||||
Income from
operations |
$ | 6,178 | 10.6 | % | $ | 10,343 | 15.4 | % | $ | 16,521 | 13.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Florida | Canada | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 151,801 | 100.0 | % | $ | 163,937 | 100.0 | % | $ | 315,738 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of
operations |
94,348 | 62.2 | % | 109,548 | 66.8 | % | 203,896 | 64.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative
expense |
18,922 | 12.5 | % | 20,112 | 12.3 | % | 39,034 | 12.4 | % | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization |
19,039 | 12.5 | % | 12,977 | 7.9 | % | 32,016 | 10.1 | % | |||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of property and equipment,
foreign exchange and
other |
(2,273 | ) | -1.5 | % | (260 | ) | -0.2 | % | (2,533 | ) | -0.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Income from
operations |
$ | 21,765 | 14.3 | % | $ | 21,560 | 13.2 | % | $ | 43,325 | 13.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Florida | Canada | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 179,331 | 100.0 | % | $ | 191,304 | 100.0 | % | $ | 370,635 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of
operations |
116,497 | 65.0 | % | 126,164 | 65.9 | % | 242,661 | 65.5 | % | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative
expense |
24,055 | 13.4 | % | 23,888 | 12.5 | % | 47,943 | 12.9 | % | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization |
19,903 | 11.1 | % | 14,923 | 7.8 | % | 34,826 | 9.4 | % | |||||||||||||||
Loss (gain) on sale of property and equipment,
foreign exchange and
other |
(463 | ) | -0.3 | % | 141 | 0.1 | % | (322 | ) | -0.1 | % | |||||||||||||
Income from
operations |
$ | 19,339 | 10.8 | % | $ | 26,188 | 13.7 | % | $ | 45,527 | 12.3 | % | ||||||||||||
34
Table of Contents
Revenue
A summary of our revenue is as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collection |
$ | 93,566 | 74.3 | % | $ | 102,284 | 73.7 | % | $ | 266,297 | 75.6 | % | $ | 303,654 | 74.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Landfill
disposal |
11,205 | 8.9 | % | 12,818 | 9.2 | % | 31,691 | 9.0 | % | 37,404 | 9.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Transfer station |
17,718 | 14.1 | % | 17,676 | 12.7 | % | 46,496 | 13.2 | % | 50,243 | 12.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Material recovery
facilities |
3,067 | 2.4 | % | 5,302 | 3.8 | % | 6,709 | 1.9 | % | 16,695 | 4.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other specialized
services |
457 | 0.3 | % | 651 | 0.6 | % | 903 | 0.3 | % | 1,475 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
126,013 | 100.0 | % | 138,731 | 100.0 | % | 352,096 | 100.0 | % | 409,471 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany
elimination |
(13,552 | ) | (12,986 | ) | (36,358 | ) | (38,836 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 112,461 | $ | 125,745 | $ | 315,738 | $ | 370,635 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue was $112.5 million and $125.7 million for the three months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively, a decrease of $13.2 million or 10.6%. The decrease in revenue from our
Florida operations for the three months ended September 30, 2009 of $7.6 million or 13.1% was
driven by decreased collection volumes, primarily in our industrial and commercial lines of
business of $2.9 million, coupled with lower third-party transfer station, recycling and landfill
volumes of $1.6 million. Declining fuel costs resulted in lower surcharges of $3.0 million and
other net decreases of $3.1 million, primarily related to the expiration or divestiture of certain
residential collection contracts. Offsetting these decreases were net price increases of $2.8
million, which were adversely affected by commodity pricing declines of $0.4 million, and net
increases from acquisitions of $0.2 million.
The decrease in revenue from our Canadian operations for the three months ended September 30,
2009 of $5.6 million or 8.4% was primarily due to the unfavorable effect of foreign exchange
movements of $4.2 million. After considering foreign exchange rate changes, revenue from our
Canadian operations declined $1.4 million or 2.1% as a result of decreased overall waste volumes of
$2.6 million and decreases in fuel surcharges of $2.3 million. Offsetting these decreases were net
price increases of $3.2 million and other increases of $0.3 million.
Revenue was $315.7 million and $370.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively, a decrease of $54.9 million or 14.8%. The decrease in revenue from our Florida
operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 of $27.5 million or 15.4% was driven by
decreased collection volumes, primarily in our industrial and commercial lines of business of $8.7
million, coupled with lower third-party transfer station, recycling and landfill volumes of $6.1
million. Declining fuel costs resulted in lower surcharges of $9.3 million and other net decreases
of $10.6 million, primarily related to the expiration or divestiture of certain residential
collection contracts. Offsetting these decreases were net price increases of $6.0 million, which
were adversely affected by commodity pricing declines of $1.9 million, and net increases from
acquisitions of $1.2 million.
The decrease in revenue from our Canadian operations for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 of $27.4 million or 14.3% was primarily due to the unfavorable effect of foreign exchange
movements of $24.4 million. After considering foreign exchange rate changes, revenue from our
Canadian operations declined $3.0 million or 1.6% as a result of decreases in fuel surcharges of
$5.5 million, decreased overall waste volumes of $4.4 million and other decreases of $0.7 million,
primarily related to the loss of certain contracts. Offsetting these decreases were net price
increases of $7.6 million, which were adversely affected by net commodity pricing declines of $0.5
million.
35
Table of Contents
Cost of Operations
Cost of operations was $71.2 million and $82.5 million for the three months ended September
30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, a decrease of $11.3 million or 13.7%. As a percentage of revenue,
cost of operations was 63.3% and 65.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
The decrease in cost of operations from our Florida operations for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 of $7.3 million or 19.1% was due to lower labor costs of $2.4 million resulting
from route reductions and consolidations, decreased fuel costs of $2.0 million, lower costs for
third-party disposal due to overall lower collection volumes of $1.6 million and decreases in other
operating costs of $1.3 million. As a percentage of revenue, cost of operations for our Florida
operations was 60.7% and 65.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The improvement in our domestic gross margin is primarily due to cost controls
implemented in the fourth quarter of 2008, which continued into 2009.
The decrease in cost of operations from our Canadian operations for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 of $4.0 million or 9.1% was primarily due to the favorable effect of foreign
exchange movements of $2.7 million. After considering foreign exchange rate changes, cost of
operations from our Canadian operations decreased $1.3 million or 3.0%, which primarily relates to
decreased fuel costs of $1.7 million and decreased disposal costs of $1.3 million resulting from
increased internalization in Western Canada, offset by increased labor costs of $0.7 million and
increased repair, maintenance and other cost increases of $1.0 million. As a percentage of
revenue, cost of operations for our Canadian operations was 65.5% and 66.0% for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Cost of operations was $203.9 million and $242.7 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, a decrease of $38.8 million or 16.0%. As a percentage of revenue,
cost of operations was 64.6% and 65.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
The decrease in cost of operations from our Florida operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 of $22.2 million or 19.0% was due to lower labor costs of $6.8 million resulting
from route reductions and consolidations, lower costs for third-party disposal due to overall lower
collection volumes of $6.0 million, decreased fuel costs of $5.9 million and decreases in other
operating costs of $3.5 million. As a percentage of revenue, cost of operations for our Florida
operations was 62.2% and 65.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The improvement in our domestic gross margin is primarily due to cost controls implemented in the
fourth quarter of 2008, which continued into 2009.
The decrease in cost of operations from our Canadian operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 of $16.6 million or 13.2% was primarily due to the favorable effect of foreign
exchange movements of $16.3 million. After considering foreign exchange rate changes, cost of
operations from our Canadian operations was relatively flat as decreased fuel costs of $4.6 million
were offset by increased labor costs of $2.1 million and repair, maintenance and other cost
increases of $2.2 million. As a percentage of revenue, cost of operations for our Canadian
operations was 66.8% and 65.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The decline in our Canadian gross margin is primarily due to lower margin waste streams disposed
of at our facilities and higher operating costs, as previously discussed.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense was $13.1 million and $15.1 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, a decrease of $2.0 million or 13.2%. As a
percentage of revenue, selling, general and administrative expense was 11.6% and 12.0% for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The overall decrease in selling,
general and administrative expense was affected by a restructuring of corporate overhead and other
administrative and operational functions that we completed during the fourth quarter of 2008, which
is more fully described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
These restructuring efforts are the primary driver of the overall decrease in selling, general and
administrative costs. Salaries and related benefits declined $1.1 million as a result of these
restructuring efforts as well as reduced expense relative to our employee bonus program.
Stock-based compensation expense also decreased $0.5 million as we had incurred higher costs
relative to certain option grants in the third quarter of 2008 that did not recur in 2009. The
favorable effect of foreign exchange movements was $0.4 million.
36
Table of Contents
Selling, general and administrative expense was $39.0 million and $47.9 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, a decrease of $8.9 million or 18.6%. As a
percentage of revenue, selling, general and administrative expense was 12.4% and 12.9% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The overall decrease in selling, general
and administrative expense was affected by the restructuring of corporate overhead and other
administrative and operational functions, which is discussed above and more fully described in our
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. These restructuring efforts are
the primary driver of the overall decrease in selling, general and administrative costs. Salaries
and related benefits declined $5.0 million as a result of these restructuring efforts as well as
reduced expense relative to our employee bonus program. Stock-based compensation expense also
decreased $0.5 million as we had incurred higher costs relative to certain option grants in the
second and third quarters of 2008 that did not recur in 2009. The favorable effect of foreign
exchange movements was $3.0 million.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
Depreciation, depletion and amortization was $10.9 million and $11.5 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, a decrease of $0.6 million or 4.9%. As a
percentage of revenue, depreciation, depletion and amortization was 9.8% and 9.1% for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Amortization of intangible assets decreased
$0.3 million primarily due to lower amortization associated with our customer relationship
intangible assets. Foreign exchange rate movements had a favorable effect of $0.3 million.
Landfill depletion rates for our U.S. landfills ranged from $5.66 to $6.09 per ton and $4.02 to
$6.16 per ton during the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Landfill
depletion rates for our Canadian landfills ranged from C$0.66 to C$8.01 per tonne and C$2.99 to
C$7.28 per tonne during the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization was $32.0 million and $34.8 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, a decrease of $2.8 million or 8.1%. As a
percentage of revenue, depreciation, depletion and amortization was 10.1% and 9.4% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Foreign exchange rate movements had a
favorable effect of $1.9 million. Amortization of intangible assets decreased $1.0 million
primarily due to lower amortization associated with our customer relationship intangible assets.
The decreased expense also relates to decreased landfill depletion of $0.6 million, which is
primarily due to decreased disposal volumes at our domestic landfills. Landfill depletion rates for
our U.S. landfills ranged from $5.66 to $6.09 per ton and $4.02 to $6.16 per ton during the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Landfill depletion rates for our Canadian
landfills ranged from C$0.66 to C$8.01 per tonne and C$2.99 to C$7.28 per tonne during the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Loss (Gain) on Sale of Property and Equipment, Foreign Exchange and Other
Loss (gain) on sale of property and equipment, foreign exchange and other was less than $(0.1)
million and $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and
$(2.5) million and $(0.3) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Foreign exchange loss or gain relates to the re-measuring of U.S. dollar denominated
monetary accounts held by our Canadian operations into Canadian dollars.
During the first quarter of 2009, we sold certain land and buildings under the terms of a
lease purchase option entered into with the purchaser of our Jacksonville, Florida operations. The
purchase price for the land and buildings was $6.0 million with an associated gain on sale of $3.3
million, which is the primary driver of the increase in gain on sale of property and equipment,
foreign exchange and other for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period
in the previous year.
37
Table of Contents
Interest Expense
The components of interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008 are as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Senior Secured Credit
Facilities |
$ | 2,116 | $ | 2,990 | $ | 6,528 | $ | 10,925 | ||||||||
Senior Subordinated
Notes |
3,932 | 3,800 | 11,532 | 11,400 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of debt issue costs and
discounts |
896 | 492 | 2,593 | 2,008 | ||||||||||||
Other interest expense |
584 | 448 | 1,765 | 1,437 | ||||||||||||
$ | 7,528 | $ | 7,730 | $ | 22,418 | $ | 25,770 | |||||||||
Interest expense was $7.5 million and $7.7 million for the three months ended September
30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, a decrease of $0.2 million or 2.6%. Interest expense on the Senior
Secured Credit Facilities decreased $0.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 due
primarily to lower average interest rates and lower overall balances outstanding during the period.
The weighted average interest rate on borrowings under the U.S. dollar denominated Senior Secured
Credit Facilities was 4.1% and 5.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively and 4.1% for our Canadian dollar denominated Senior Secured Credit Facilities, which
were first established in October 2008, for the three months ended September 30, 2009. Partially
offsetting the lower amounts of interest expense incurred on our Senior Secured Credit Facilities
was increased amortization of debt issue costs and discounts, which relates to the refinancing of
our Senior Secured Credit Facilities in October 2008, which is discussed in further detail below.
Interest expense was $22.4 million and $25.8 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively, a decrease of $3.4 million or 13.0%. Interest expense on the Senior
Secured Credit Facilities decreased $4.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 due
primarily to lower average interest rates and lower overall balances outstanding during the period.
The weighted average interest rate on borrowings under the U.S. dollar denominated Senior Secured
Credit Facilities was 4.1% and 6.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively and 4.3% for our Canadian dollar denominated Senior Secured Credit Facilities for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Interest expense on the Senior Subordinated Notes increased $0.1 million for both the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2009 due to interest on an additional $50.0 million aggregate
principal of Senior Subordinated Notes that were issued on September 21, 2009, which is described
in further detail elsewhere in this report. We expect to incur additional annual interest expense
of $4.8 million relative to these additional notes.
In March 2008, we used $42.5 million of proceeds from the sale of our Jacksonville, Florida
operations to make a prepayment of the term notes under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities. As
such, we expensed $0.5 million of unamortized debt issue cost related to the retirement.
Change in Fair Value of Warrants
Effective January 1, 2009 we adopted guidance related to determining whether an instrument or
embedded feature is indexed to an entitys own stock. This guidance applies to any freestanding
financial instruments or embedded features that have the characteristics of a derivative and to any
freestanding financial instruments that are potentially settled in an entitys own common stock.
As a result of adopting this accounting guidance, outstanding common stock purchase warrants to
purchase 2,383,333 common shares that were previously treated as equity pursuant to the derivative
treatment exemption, were no longer afforded equity treatment. These warrants have a strike price
of $9.00 per share and expire in May 2010. As such, effective January 1, 2009 we reclassified the
fair value of these common stock purchase warrants, which have exercise price reset features, from
equity to liability status as if these warrants were treated as a derivative liability since their
date of issue in May 2003. On January 1, 2009, we reclassified from additional paid-in capital to
beginning accumulated deficit $11.4 million, as a cumulative effect adjustment, and $2.4 million to
a long-term warrant
liability to recognize the fair value of these warrants on such date. The fair value of these
common stock purchase warrants declined to $0.3 million as of September 30, 2009. We recognized a
gain of $0.7 million and $2.1 million from the change in fair value of these warrants for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
38
Table of Contents
Income Tax Provision (Benefit)
The provision for income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was $3.7 million,
which was comprised of a $1.8 million provision for our U.S. operations and parent company and a
$1.9 million provision for our Canadian operations. The provision for income taxes for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 was $8.8 million, which was comprised of a $5.3 million provision
for our U.S. operations and parent company and a $3.5 million provision for our Canadian
operations. We provide a 100% valuation allowance for our net operating loss carry-forwards
generated in the United States. In recording the valuation allowance, we considered our historical
operating results, a five year forecast of future operations and future reversals of our existing
temporary differences. As of the date of this filing, there are no material tax planning
strategies being considered that would trigger realization of the U.S. net operating losses. Given
the history of operating losses in the U.S., the future reversals of temporary differences and the
magnitude of the net operating loss carry-forward, we concluded as of September 30, 2009 that it is
more likely than not that the U.S. deferred tax assets would not be recovered from future U.S.
taxable income and accordingly, we believe a full valuation allowance against these deferred tax
assets continues to be necessary. As of September 30, 2009, our valuation allowance totaled $58.7
million, of which $51.6 million relates to our U.S. operations.
In addition to the valuation allowance recorded for our net operating loss carry-forwards
generated in the U.S., we also provide deferred tax liabilities generated by our tax deductible
goodwill. The effect of not benefiting our domestic net operating loss carry-forwards and
separately providing deferred tax liabilities for our tax deductible goodwill is to increase our
domestic effective tax rate above the statutory amount that would otherwise be expected. Should we
generate taxable income domestically, we expect our deferred tax liabilities generated from
goodwill will offset other deferred tax assets and we will not provide for them separately.
However, we currently do not foresee a decrease in our domestic effective tax rate for the
remainder of 2009. We have not paid any domestic cash income taxes during the periods presented
nor do we expect to pay any during the remainder of 2009.
We recognize a provision for foreign taxes on our Canadian income including taxes for
stock-based compensation, which is a non-deductible item for income tax reporting in Canada. Since
stock-based compensation is a non-deductible expense and a permanent difference, our future
effective tax rate in Canada is affected by the level of stock-based compensation incurred in a
particular period. We expect that during the remainder of 2009, our Canadian statutory rate will
approximate 32.0%. However, as a result of stock-based compensation, our effective rate is expected
to approximate 32.0% to 34.0%. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we paid
C$1.3 million and C$5.2 million, respectively, relative to both our actual 2008 and estimated 2009
tax liabilities in Canada. We expect our estimated tax payments to approximate C$1.0 million for
the fourth quarter of 2009. Included in our provision for income taxes for our Canadian
operations for the second quarter of 2009 is a C$1.2 million benefit, which relates to the release
of the valuation allowance on the non-capital loss carryforwards of our subsidiary, Capital
Environmental Holdings Company (Holdings), that can now be utilized as a result of the
amalgamation of Holdings and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Waste Services (CA) Inc., which was
planned during the second quarter of 2009 following the exchange of all remaining exchangeable
shares of Waste Services (CA) Inc., not owned by affiliates and was completed during the third
quarter of 2009.
The provision for income taxes from continuing operations for the three months ended September
30, 2008 was $5.3 million, which was comprised of a $1.7 million provision for our U.S. operations
and parent company and a $3.6 million provision for our Canadian operations. The provision for
income taxes from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $6.9
million, which was comprised of a $2.0 million benefit for our U.S. operations and parent company
and an $8.9 million provision for our Canadian operations. The benefit for income taxes from
continuing operations for our US operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was
primarily the result of the gain on sale of our Jacksonville, Florida operations as we benefited
$4.8 million of our previously fully reserved net operating loss carry-forwards and reversed $2.6
million of excess deferred tax liabilities related to goodwill.
39
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal capital requirements are to fund capital expenditures, and to fund debt service
and asset acquisitions. Significant sources of liquidity are cash on hand, working capital,
borrowings from our Senior Secured Credit Facilities and proceeds from debt and/or equity
issuances. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
Senior Secured Credit Facilities
On October 8, 2008 we refinanced our Senior Secured Credit Facilities with new Senior Secured
Credit Facilities (the Credit Facilities) with a consortium of new lenders. The Credit Facilities
provide for a revolving credit facility of $124.8 million, which is available to either Waste
Services, Inc. and our U.S. operations or our Canadian operations, in U.S. or Canadian dollars, and
C$16.3 million, which is available to our Canadian operations. The new Credit Facilities also
provide for term loans with initial principal balances of $39.9 million to Waste Services, Inc. and
C$132.2 million to Waste Services (CA) Inc. The revolver commitments terminate on October 8, 2013
and the term loans mature in specified quarterly installments through October 8, 2013. The Credit
Facilities are available to us as base rate loans, Eurodollar loans or Bankers Acceptance loans,
plus an applicable margin, as defined, at our option in the respective lending jurisdiction. The
Credit Facilities are secured by all of our assets, including those of our domestic and foreign
subsidiaries, and are guaranteed by all of our domestic and foreign subsidiaries. As of September
30, 2009, there was C$6.0 million outstanding on the Canadian dollar denominated revolving credit
facility and $11.6 million and C$14.0 million of revolver capacity was used to support outstanding
letters of credit in the U.S. and Canada, respectively. As of September 30, 2009, no amounts were
drawn on our U.S. dollar denominated revolving credit facility and we had unused availability of
$109.8 million under our revolving credit facilities, subject to certain conditions. As of October
26, 2009, there was $39.0 million and C$10.0 million drawn on the revolving credit facility and
$11.6 million and C$13.9 million of revolver capacity was used to support outstanding letters of
credit in the U.S. and Canada, respectively and we had unused availability of $67.2 million under
our revolving credit facilities, subject to certain conditions.
Our Credit Facilities contain certain financial and other covenants that restrict our ability
to, among other things, make capital expenditures, incur indebtedness, incur liens, dispose of
property, repay debt, pay dividends, repurchase shares and make certain acquisitions. Our financial
covenants include: (i) maximum total leverage; (ii) maximum senior secured leverage; and (iii)
minimum interest coverage. The covenants and restrictions limit the manner in which we conduct our
operations and could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital. The following table
sets forth our financial covenant levels for the current and each of the following four quarters:
Maximum | Maximum | Minimum | ||||||||||
Consolidated | Consolidated | Consolidated | ||||||||||
Leverage | Senior Secured | Interest | ||||||||||
Ratio | Leverage Ratio | Coverage Ratio | ||||||||||
Third quarter -
2009 |
4.25 : 1.00 | 2.75 : 1.00 | 2.75 : 1.00 | |||||||||
Fourth quarter -
2009 |
4.25 : 1.00 | 2.75 : 1.00 | 2.75 : 1.00 | |||||||||
First quarter -
2010 |
4.25 : 1.00 | 2.75 : 1.00 | 2.75 : 1.00 | |||||||||
Second quarter -
2010 |
4.25 : 1.00 | 2.75 : 1.00 | 2.75 : 1.00 | |||||||||
Third quarter -
2010 |
4.00 : 1.00 | 2.75 : 1.00 | 2.75 : 1.00 |
As of September 30, 2009, the actual ratios achieved for the financial covenants in the
above table are as follows: Maximum Consolidated Leverage Ratio 3.86 to 1.00; Maximum
Consolidated Senior Secured Leverage Ratio 1.73 to 1.00; and Minimum
Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio 3.45 to 1.00. As of September 30, 2009, we were in
compliance with the financial covenants of our Credit Facilities and we expect to be in compliance
with the financial covenants of our Credit Facilities in future periods.
Other Secured Notes Payable
Included in our other secured notes payable is a $10.5 million non-interest bearing promissory
note with payments of $125,000 per month until June 2014. The net present value of the remaining
payments due under the note as of September 30, 2009 approximates $5.9 million and accretes
interest at 7.8%. The note is secured by a transfer station and related permit.
40
Table of Contents
Senior Subordinated Notes
On April 30, 2004, we completed a private offering of 91/2% Senior Subordinated Notes (Senior
Subordinated Notes) due 2014 for gross proceeds of $160.0 million. On September 21, 2009 we
completed an additional private placement of $50.0 million aggregate principal of our Senior
Subordinated Notes, with terms identical to the initial offering. This additional private placement
resulted in gross proceeds of $49.5 million with an additional $2.1 million received from the
purchasers for accrued interest. The Senior Subordinated Notes mature on April 15, 2014. Interest
on the Senior Subordinated Notes is payable semiannually on October 15 and April 15. The Senior
Subordinated Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at our option, on or after April 15, 2009,
at a redemption price of 104.75% of the principal amount, declining ratably in annual increments to
par on or after April 15, 2012, together with accrued interest to the redemption date. Upon a
change of control, as such term is defined in the Indenture, we are required to offer to repurchase
all the Senior Subordinated Notes at 101.0% of the principal amount, together with accrued interest
and liquidated damages, if any, and obtain the consent of our senior lenders to such payment or
repay indebtedness under our Credit Facilities.
The Senior Subordinated Notes are unsecured and are subordinate to our existing and future
senior secured indebtedness, including our Credit Facilities, rank equally with any unsecured
senior subordinated indebtedness and are senior to our existing and future subordinated
indebtedness. Our obligations with respect to the Senior Subordinated Notes, including principal,
interest, premium, if any, and liquidated damages, if any, are fully and unconditionally guaranteed
on an unsecured, senior subordinated basis by all of our existing domestic and foreign
subsidiaries.
The Senior Subordinated Notes contain certain covenants that, in certain circumstances and
subject to certain limitations and qualifications, restrict, among other things: (i) the incurrence
of additional debt; (ii) the payment of dividends and repurchases of stock; (iii) the issuance of
preferred stock and the issuance of stock of our subsidiaries; (iv) certain investments; (v)
transactions with affiliates; and (vi) certain sales of assets.
The indenture relating to our Senior Subordinated Notes contains cross default provisions (i)
should we fail to pay the principal amount of other indebtedness when due (after applicable grace
periods) or the maturity date of that indebtedness is accelerated and the amount in question is
$10.0 million or more or (ii) should we fail to pay judgments in excess of $10.0 million in the
aggregate for more than 60 days.
Surety Bonds, Letters of Credit and Insurance
Municipal solid waste services contracts and permits and licenses to operate transfer
stations, landfills and recycling facilities may require performance or surety bonds, letters of
credit or other means of financial assurance to secure contractual performance. As of September 30,
2009, we provided customers, various regulatory authorities and our insurer with such bonds and
letters of credit amounting to approximately $83.2 million to collateralize our obligations, which
is comprised of $46.1 million and C$13.4 million of performance and surety bonds or other means of
financial assurance and $11.6 million and C$14.0 million of letters of credit. The majority of
these obligations are renewed on an annual basis.
Our domestic based workers compensation, automobile and general liability insurance coverage
is subject to certain deductible limits. We retain up to $0.5 million and $0.25 million of risk per
claim, plus claims handling expense under our workers compensation and our auto and general
liability insurance programs, respectively. Claims in excess of such deductible levels are fully
insured subject to our policy limits. However, we have a limited claims history for our U.S.
operations and it is reasonably possible that recorded reserves may not be adequate to cover future
payments of claims. Adjustments, if any, to our reserves will be reflected in the period in which
the adjustments are known. As of September 30, 2009 and included in the $83.2 million of bonds and
letters of credit discussed previously, we have posted a letter of credit with our U.S. insurer of
approximately $10.9 million to secure the liability for losses within the deductible limit.
Provisions for retained claims are made by charges to expense based on periodic evaluations by
management of the estimated ultimate liabilities on both reported and incurred but not reported
claims. Adjustments, if any, to the estimated reserves resulting from ultimate claim payments will
be reflected in operations in the periods in which such adjustments become known.
41
Table of Contents
Cash Flows
The following discussion relates to the major components of the changes in cash flows for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities of our continuing operations was $47.2 million and $48.9
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in cash
provided by operating activities is primarily due to increased levels of cash used for working
capital of $1.6 million. During the first nine months of 2009, we used $3.6 million of cash for
working capital changes, which primarily relates to payments made relative to certain accrued
expenses, including closure and post closure accruals, restructuring and severance accruals and
disposal accruals. During the first nine months of 2008, we used $2.0 million of cash for working
capital changes, which primarily relates to taxes paid for our Canadian operations. Cash from
operations before working capital changes decreased $0.2 million, primarily as a result of our
overall lower revenues during the first nine months of 2009 compared to the prior year, which are
discussed elsewhere in this report.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities of our continuing operations was $(34.8)
million and $14.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, cash used in investing activities relates to capital
expenditures of $24.4 million and cash used in business combinations of $16.7 million, offset by
proceeds from the sale of property and equipment, primarily from the sale of the Jacksonville real
property, of $6.9 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, cash provided by investing
activities relates to the disposal of our Jacksonville, Florida operations, which provided proceeds
of $56.7 million, offset by capital expenditures and deposits for business acquisitions. We expect
our capital expenditures to range between $30.0 million and $40.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities of our continuing operations was $17.9 million and $43.5
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Cash used in
financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 primarily relates to principal
repayments of our Credit Facilities, offset by an additional private placement of $50.0 million
aggregate principal of our Senior Subordinated Notes, which we completed on September 21, 2009 and
resulted in gross proceeds of $49.5 million with an additional $2.1 million received from the
purchasers for accrued interest. Cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 primarily relates to a $42.5 million prepayment of our prior Senior Secured
Credit Facilities from a portion of the proceeds from the sale of our Jacksonville, Florida
operations.
Cash Flow from Discontinued Operations
Cash flows from our discontinued operations are disclosed separately on the Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows included elsewhere in this report. Having
consummated the sale of our Jacksonville, Florida operations in March 2008, we are no longer
impacted by these cash flows, and we do not anticipate any subsequent adverse affect on our future
liquidity or financial covenants.
42
Table of Contents
Off-Balance Sheet Financing
We have no off-balance sheet debt or similar obligations, other than our letters of credit and
performance and surety bonds discussed previously, which are not debt. We have no transactions or
obligations with related parties that are not disclosed, consolidated into or reflected in our
reported results of operations or financial position. We do not guarantee any third-party debt. We
have entered into a put or pay disposal agreement with RCI Environment Inc., Centres de
Transbordement et de Valorisation Nord Sud Inc., RCM Environnement Inc. (collectively the RCI
Companies) and Intersan Inc. pursuant to which we have posted a letter of credit for C$4.0 million
to secure our obligations and those of the RCI Companies to Intersan Inc. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, we were not required to make any payments to Intersan under the Disposal
Agreement. The Disposal Agreement will expire on November 22, 2009, at which time our letter of
credit also expires. The annual cost to us of maintaining the letter of credit is approximately
$0.1 million. Concurrently with the put or pay disposal agreement with the RCI Companies, we
entered into a three year agreement with Waste Management of Canada Corporation (formerly Canadian
Waste Services Inc.) to allow us to deliver non-hazardous solid waste to their landfill in
Michigan, which has expired. Details of these agreements are further described in the notes to our
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and in our annual financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed on Form 10-K. The companies within the RCI group are
controlled by a director of ours and/or individuals related to that director.
Landfill Sites
The following table reflects landfill capacity activity for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 for permitted landfills owned by us, which are part of our continuing operations (in
thousands of cubic yards):
Balance, | Changes in | Balance, | ||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Landfills | Engineering | Airspace | End | ||||||||||||||||
of Period | Expanded | Estimates | Consumed | of Period | ||||||||||||||||
United States |
||||||||||||||||||||
Permitted
capacity |
80,025 | | | (1,456 | ) | 78,569 | ||||||||||||||
Probable expansion
capacity |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total available
airspace |
80,025 | | | (1,456 | ) | 78,569 | ||||||||||||||
Number of
sites |
4 | | | | 4 | |||||||||||||||
Canada |
||||||||||||||||||||
Permitted
capacity |
11,018 | 4,709 | | (353 | ) | 15,374 | ||||||||||||||
Probable expansion
capacity |
4,852 | (4,709 | ) | (143 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Total available
airspace |
15,870 | | (143 | ) | (353 | ) | 15,374 | |||||||||||||
Number of
sites |
3 | | | | 3 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||
Permitted
capacity |
91,043 | 4,709 | | (1,809 | ) | 93,943 | ||||||||||||||
Probable expansion
capacity |
4,852 | (4,709 | ) | (143 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Total available
airspace |
95,895 | | (143 | ) | (1,809 | ) | 93,943 | |||||||||||||
Number of
sites |
7 | | | | 7 |
As of January 1, 2009, we had deemed 4.9 million cubic yards of expansion capacity at one
of our Canadian landfills. During the nine month period ended September 30, 2009, 4.7 million
cubic yards of that capacity was formally permitted and as such was reclassified to permitted
capacity.
43
Table of Contents
Trend Information
Seasonality
We expect the results of our Canadian operations to vary seasonally, with revenue typically
lowest in the first quarter of the year, higher in the second and third quarters, and lower in the
fourth quarter than in the third quarter. The seasonality is attributable to a number of factors
including:
| Less solid waste is generated during the late fall, winter and early spring because of decreased construction and demolition activity. | ||
| Certain operating costs are higher in the winter months because winter weather conditions slow waste collection activities, resulting in higher labor costs, and rain and snow increase the weight of collected waste, resulting in higher disposal costs, which are calculated on a per ton basis. | ||
| During the summer months, there are more tourists and part-time residents in some of our service areas, resulting in more residential and commercial collection. |
Consequently, we expect operating income to be generally lower during the winter. The effect
of seasonality on our results of operations from our U.S. operations, which are located in warmer
climates than our Canadian operations, is less significant than that of our Canadian operations.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update No. 2009-5, Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value (ASU 2009-05). ASU 2009-05 amends
Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. Specifically, ASU 2009-5
provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the
identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using
one or more of the following methods: (i) a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the
identical liability when traded as an asset or quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar
liabilities when traded as assets and/or (ii) a valuation technique that is consistent with the
principles of Topic 820 of the Accounting Standards Codification (e.g. an income approach or market
approach). ASU 2009-05 also clarifies that (i) when estimating the fair value of a liability, a
reporting entity is not required to adjust to include inputs relating to the existence of transfer
restrictions on that liability and (ii) that both a quoted price in an active market for an
identical liability at the measurement date and a quoted price for the identical liability when
traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are
required are Level 1 fair value measurements. ASU 2009-05 is effective for financial statements
issued for interim and annual periods beginning after August 28, 2009. We do not anticipate that
the adoption of this statement will have a material impact on our financial position and results of
operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance for determining whether an entity is a variable
interest entity (VIE). This guidance requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine
whether the enterprises variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in
a VIE. Under this guidance, an enterprise has a controlling financial interest when it has (i) the
power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entitys economic
performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits
from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Enterprises are also required to
assess whether they have an implicit financial responsibility to ensure that a VIE operates as
designed when determining whether it has power to direct the activities of the VIE that most
significantly impact the entitys economic performance. This guidance also requires ongoing
assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, requires enhanced
disclosures and eliminates the scope exclusion for qualifying special-purpose entities. This
guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009. We do not
anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our financial position
and results of operations.
44
Table of Contents
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance that seeks to improve the relevance and comparability
of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of
financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows; and a transferors continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets.
Specifically, this guidance eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, creates
more stringent conditions for reporting a transfer of a portion of a financial asset as a sale,
clarifies other sale-accounting criteria, and changes the initial measurement of a transferors
interest in transferred financial assets. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods
beginning after November 15, 2009. We do not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will
have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations.
Effective January 1, 2009 we adopted a new accounting standard that provides guidance for
determining whether an instrument or embedded feature is indexed to an entitys own stock. Details
related to our adoption of this standard and its impact on our financial position and results of
operations are discussed in more detail elsewhere in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued revised guidance for accounting for business combinations,
which established the principles and requirements for how an acquirer (i) recognizes and measures
in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; (ii) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the
business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and (iii) determines what information to
disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects
of the business combination. Previously any changes in valuation allowances as a result of income
from acquisitions for certain deferred tax assets would serve to reduce goodwill. Under this
revised guidance, any changes in the valuation allowance related to income from acquisitions
currently or in prior periods now serves to reduce income taxes in the period in which the reserve
is reversed. Additionally, transaction related expenses that were previously capitalized are now
expensed as incurred. As of December 31, 2008, we had no deferred transaction related expenses for
business combination transactions in negotiation. The provisions of this revised guidance apply
prospectively to business combinations consummated on or after January 1, 2009 and we had no
transition adjustments on January 1, 2009.
Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Factors Affecting Future Results
This Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act. Some of these forward-looking
statements include forward-looking phrases such as anticipates, believes, could, estimates,
expects, foresees, intends, may, should or will continue, or similar expressions or the
negatives thereof or other variations on these expressions, or similar terminology, or discussions
of strategy, plans or intentions.
Such statements reflect our current views regarding future events and are subject to certain
risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Many factors could cause our actual results, performance or
achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements that
forward-looking statements may express or imply, including, among others:
| our substantial indebtedness and the significant restrictive covenants in our various credit facilities and our ability to finance acquisitions and / or capital expenditures with cash on hand, debt or equity offerings; | ||
| our ability to pay principal debt amounts due at maturity; | ||
| our business is capital intensive and may consume cash in excess of cash flow from operations and borrowings; | ||
| our ability to vertically integrate our operations; | ||
| our ability to maintain and perform our financial assurance obligations; | ||
| changes in regulations affecting our business and costs of compliance; | ||
| revocation of existing permits and licenses or the refusal to renew or grant new permits and licenses, which are required to enable us to operate our business or implement our growth strategy; | ||
| our domestic operations are concentrated in Florida, which may be subject to specific economic conditions that vary from those nationally as well as weather related events that may impact our operations; | ||
| construction, equipment delivery or permitting delays for our transfer stations or landfills; |
45
Table of Contents
| our ability to successfully implement our corporate strategy and integrate any acquisitions we undertake; | ||
| our ability to negotiate renewals of existing service agreements at favorable rates; | ||
| our ability to enhance profitability of certain aspects of our operations in markets where we are not internalized through either divestiture or asset swaps; | ||
| costs and risks associated with litigation; and | ||
| changes in general business and economic conditions, commodity pricing, exchange rates, the financial markets and accounting standards or pronouncements. |
Some of these factors are discussed in more detail in our annual report on Form 10-K, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2008, included under
Item 1A. of the annual report, Risk Factors. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties
affects future events and circumstances, or if underlying assumptions do not materialize, actual
results may vary materially from those described in this Form 10-Q and our annual report as
anticipated, believed, estimated or expected, and this could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and the results of our operations. Further, any forward-looking
statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and except as required by law, we
undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances
after the date on which it is made or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated
events or circumstances.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
A portion of our operations is domiciled in Canada. For each reporting period we translate
the results of operations and financial condition of our Canadian operations into U.S. dollars.
Therefore, the reported results of our operations and financial condition are subject to changes in
the exchange relationship between the two currencies. For example, as the Canadian dollar
strengthens against the U.S. dollar, revenue is favorably affected and conversely expenses are
unfavorably affected. Assets and liabilities of our Canadian operations are translated from
Canadian dollars into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the relevant balance sheet
dates, and revenue and expenses of our Canadian operations are translated from Canadian dollars
into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rates prevailing during the period. Unrealized gains and
losses on translation of our Canadian operations into U.S. dollars are reported as a separate
component of shareholders equity and are included in comprehensive income or loss. Monetary assets
and liabilities are re-measured from U.S. dollars into Canadian dollars and then translated into
U.S. dollars. The effects of re-measurement are reported currently as a component of net income.
Currently, we do not hedge our exposure to changes in foreign exchange rates. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, we estimate that a 10.0% increase or decrease in the relationship of the
Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar would increase or decrease operating profit from our Canadian
operations by approximately $2.2 million.
On October 8, 2008, we refinanced our Senior Secured Credit Facilities with new Senior Secured
Credit Facilities (the Credit Facilities) with a consortium of new lenders. A portion of the
Credit Facilities is denominated and payable in Canadian dollars, which totaled $119.6 million as
of September 30, 2009. We estimate that a 10.0% increase or decrease in the relationship of the
Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar as of September 30, 2009 would increase or decrease the reported
amount due under the Credit Facilities by approximately $12.0 million. We estimate that a 10.0%
increase or decrease in the relationship of the Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar would increase
or decrease interest expense by approximately $0.5 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009.
We are exposed to variable interest rates under our Credit Facilities, which are available to
us as base rate loans, Eurodollar loans or Bankers Acceptance loans, plus an applicable margin, as
defined, at our option in the respective lending jurisdiction. A hypothetical 10.0% change in
interest rates relative to our Credit Facilities would increase cash interest expense by
approximately $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. We determined this impact
by applying the hypothetical change to the weighted average variable interest rate at September 30,
2009 and then assessing this notional rate against the borrowings outstanding as of September 30,
2009.
46
Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to
be disclosed in our filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported accurately within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms. As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was
performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures (pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15). Based on this
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures are effective. The conclusions of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer from this evaluation were communicated to the Audit Committee.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Information regarding our legal proceedings may be found under the Legal Proceedings section
of Note 14, Commitments and Contingencies to our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements contained elsewhere in this report.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in risk factors previously disclosed in our Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5. Other Information
None
47
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit 4.1
|
Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 5, 2007 to the Notes Indenture among SLD Landfill, Inc., Pro Disposal, Inc., Waste Services, Inc., the other guarantors and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.16 to Form 10-K (000-29555) filed March 5, 2007). | |
Exhibit 4.2
|
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 12, 2007, among Freedom Recycling Holdings, U.S.A. Recycling Holdings L.L.C., U.S.A. Recycling L.L.C., Waste Services, Inc., the other guarantors and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-Q (000-29555) filed July 26, 2007). | |
Exhibit 4.3
|
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 30, 2008, among RIP, Inc., Waste Services, Inc., the other guarantors and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee. | |
Exhibit 10.1
|
Separation Agreement with Charles Wilcox. | |
Exhibit 10.2
|
Credit Agreement dated as of October 8, 2008 among Waste Services, Inc., Waste Services (CA) Inc., the several lenders from time to time party hereto, Barclays Capital and Banc of America Securities, LLC as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Lead Bookrunners, Bank of America, NA as Syndication Agent, Bosic Inc., Suntrust Bank and The Bank of Nova Scotia as Co-documentation Agents and The Bank of Nova Scotia as Canadian Agent and Canadian Collateral Agent. | |
Exhibit 10.3
|
First Amendment to Credit Agreement and First Amendment to Guarantee and US Collateral Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2009, among Waste Services (CA), Inc., Waste Services, Inc., the Subsidiaries of the Borrowers, and Barclays Banks Plc, as administrative agent for the Lenders (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 20.1 to Form 8-K (000-29555) filed September 16, 2009). | |
Exhibit 31.1
|
Section 302 Certification of David Sutherland-Yoest, Chief Executive Officer. | |
Exhibit 31.2
|
Section 302 Certification of Edwin D. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer. | |
Exhibit 32.1
|
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. |
48
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: October 29, 2009 |
WASTE SERVICES, INC.
|
|||
By: | /s/ DAVID SUTHERLAND-YOEST | |||
David Sutherland-Yoest | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
By: | /s/ EDWIN D. JOHNSON | |||
Edwin D. Johnson | ||||
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
49
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No | Description | |
Exhibit 4.1
|
Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 5, 2007 to the Notes Indenture among SLD Landfill, Inc., Pro Disposal, Inc., Waste Services, Inc., the other guarantors and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.16 to Form 10-K (000-29555) filed March 5, 2007). | |
Exhibit 4.2
|
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 12, 2007, among Freedom Recycling Holdings, U.S.A. Recycling Holdings L.L.C., U.S.A. Recycling L.L.C., Waste Services, Inc., the other guarantors and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-Q (000-29555) filed July 26, 2007). | |
Exhibit 4.3
|
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 30, 2008, among RIP, Inc., Waste Services, Inc., the other guarantors and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee. | |
Exhibit 10.1
|
Separation Agreement with Charles Wilcox. | |
Exhibit 10.2
|
Credit Agreement dated as of October 8, 2008 among Waste Services, Inc., Waste Services (CA) Inc., the several lenders from time to time party hereto, Barclays Capital and Banc of America Securities, LLC as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Lead Bookrunners, Bank of America, NA as Syndication Agent, Bosic Inc., Suntrust Bank and The Bank of Nova Scotia as Co-documentation Agents and The Bank of Nova Scotia as Canadian Agent and Canadian Collateral Agent. | |
Exhibit 10.3
|
First Amendment to Credit Agreement and First Amendment to Guarantee and US Collateral Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2009, among Waste Services (CA), Inc., Waste Services, Inc., the Subsidiaries of the Borrowers, and Barclays Banks Plc, as administrative agent for the Lenders (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 20.1 to Form 8-K (000-29555) filed September 16, 2009). | |
Exhibit 31.1
|
Section 302 Certification of David Sutherland-Yoest, Chief Executive Officer. | |
Exhibit 31.2
|
Section 302 Certification of Edwin D. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer. | |
Exhibit 32.1
|
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. |
50